alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Protocols and Controls

Aerial Neighborhood and Property/Real Estate Videos and Photography Safety for public on the ground as well as manned aircraft above is an essential and utmost consideration for aerial videos and photography. As such, safety protocols and controls must be implemented through pre-flight preparation and during flight. PRE-FLIGHT CHECK • Check batteries with voltage meter to insure fully charged and ready to use. • Inspect batteries for damage or leakage that may affect operaton. • Inspect propellers for cracks, chips or damage that may cause sudden loss of propulsion or unmanageable/uncontrolled flight. • Check weather forecast for wind advisory or other conditions that might impact flight. • Consult a 5 mile radius map for airport vicinity.

– Contact respective airport to advise of estimated flight time, estimated duration of flight, estimated altitude of flight and other pertinent information. • Inspect flight area for:

– Vicinity of public safety helipads/heliports

– Vicinity of medical helipads/heliports

– Vicinity of light poles

– Vicinity of trees

– Flocks of birds that may cause interference and potential flight impact

– Vicinity of any elevated obstructions that may pose potential flight hazard

– Vicinity of roadways with moderate to heave traffic flow that can be distracted

– Public gatherings that may attract viewers

– Optional point of control for best visual site of UAS while in flight • Takeoff and Landing

– Inspect area for best and safest point for takeoff and landing

– If in a subdivision or area within 150 feet of a residential street, post a warning sign/stand “Attention! Aerial Photography In Progress – Remain back 150 Feet” FLIGHT PROTOCOL • Take off and land at the same location • Remain alert to birds, aircraft, public and approaching vehicles. • Do not allow anyone to engage in conversation or distract the remote control pilot. • Restrict flight to minimal elevation sufficient to acquire desired results. • Remain prepared for emergency landing at all times. • Pay attention to flight time and if possible, set a timer as a safety alert. • Land UAS and shut down propellers immediately following landing.POST FLIGHT

• Disconnect battery to prevent accidental activation of propulsion system. • Secure UAS in lockable carry case. • Remove all warning signs from area. EMERGENCY OR HAZARD • Immediately land UAS at safest and closest ground location in the event; • Manned aircraft is seen or heard in vicinity of flight • There is a public gathering within established safety boundary, wanting to observe flight. • Pilot is distracted from focusing on the flight and safety. • Sudden change in weather. • Sudden increase in vehicular traffic in vicinity of flight. • Birds in proximity of flight. • Any sudden or unsafe event that can cause collision, distraction, interruption to control of flight or inability to keep UAS in line of sight.
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0725Mediating Citizen Complaints Against Police Officers: A Guide for Police and Community LeadersThis guide addresses the implementation, expectations, and evaluation of police/citizen mediation programs. It addresses how to overcome obstacles to mediation such as police and citizen resistance. Key issues discussed include eligibility, cultural barriers, and creating a level playing field. The guide presents examples of successful mediation processes for communities thinking about developing a mediation program.By Samuel Walker, Carol Archold, Leigh HebstCategories: Ethics and IntegrityLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0725Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Aug 2002Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 02:14 (UTC-5) in 0.19 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
# EUR-Lex - 12002E128 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E128

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Three: Community policies - Title VIII: Employment - Article 128 **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0089 - 0089 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0235 - Consolidated version *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Three: Community policies

Title VIII: Employment

Article 128

Article 128

1. The European Council shall each year consider the employment situation in the Community and adopt conclusions thereon, on the basis of a joint annual report by the Council and the Commission.

2. On the basis of the conclusions of the European Council, the Council, acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the Employment Committee referred to in Article 130, shall each year draw up guidelines which the Member States shall take into account in their employment policies. These guidelines shall be consistent with the broad guidelines adopted pursuant to Article 99(2).

3. Each Member State shall provide the Council and the Commission with an annual report on the principal measures taken to implement its employment policy in the light of the guidelines for employment as referred to in paragraph 2.

4. The Council, on the basis of the reports referred to in paragraph 3 and having received the views of the Employment Committee, shall each year carry out an examination of the implementation of the employment policies of the Member States in the light of the guidelines for employment. The Council, acting by a qualified majority on a recommendation from the Commission, may, if it considers it appropriate in the light of that examination, make recommendations to Member States.

5. On the basis of the results of that examination, the Council and the Commission shall make a joint annual report to the European Council on the employment situation in the Community and on the implementation of the guidelines for employment.
§ 217.173 Prohibitions. ( a ) Except for the takings contemplated in § 217.172 and authorized by a LOA issued under §§ 216.106 of this chapter and 217.176, it is unlawful for any person to do any of the following in connection with the activities described in § 217.170: ( 1 ) Violate, or fail to comply with, the terms, conditions, and requirements of this subpart or a LOA issued under §§ 216.106 of this chapter and 217.176;
( 2 ) Take any marine mammal not specified in such LOA;
( 3 ) Take any marine mammal specified in such LOA in any manner other than as specified;
( 4 ) Take a marine mammal specified in such LOA if NMFS determines such taking results in more than a negligible impact on the species or stocks of such marine mammal; or
( b ) [Reserved]
Jaffrey Municipal Court,

No. 4773.

#### State *v.*Leo N. Beauvais.

Submitted October 7, 1959.

Decided November 3, 1959.

*277
      *Louis C. Wyman,*Attorney General, *Irma A. Matthews,*Law Assistant, and *Arthur Olson, Jr.,*county attorney, for the State.

*William D. Tribble*for the defendant, furnished no brief.

Duncan, J.

The motion presents the issue of whether there was evidence from which the defendant could be found guilty of violation of RSA 262:lo-a (supp.), which makes it a misdemeanor to operate a motor vehicle “in a grossly careless or grossly negligent manner,” not constituting reckless operation and which does not result in death. The section defines grossly careless or negligent operation as “that manner of operation of a motor vehicle which, although short of wilful and intentional wrong, is marked by more want of care than simple inadvertence and is carelessness substantially and appreciably higher in magnitude than ordinary negligence or carelessness, or a high degree of indifference to the operator’s duty.” *Id.*

The complaint alleged in detail the course of conduct later disclosed by the evidence at the trial, and characterized it in the language of the statutory definition quoted above. See *State*v. *Turgeon,*101 N. H. 300.

The carelessness with which this defendant is charged consisted of the operation of his automobile under circumstances which would lead a reasonable man to appreciate the existence of a greater than ordinary risk that sleep would overtake him. The defendant had gone without sleep for a long period of time during which he had done a full day’s work, had later done other physical labor, had hunted for six hours in the late evening and early morning of the next day, and had then consumed “two drinks” of intoxicating liquor at a time when any relaxation was likely to produce drowsiness. Under the conditions disclosed the possibility that the defendant would fall asleep at the wheel was a foreseeable risk, of which it could be found that he knew or should have known.

The evidence reported by the transferred case warrants, although it does not necessarily compel, a finding that the defendant in *278fact fell asleep while driving, and that his indifference to the risk that he might do so brought his conduct within the purview of the statute. See *Steele*v. *Lackey,*107 Vt. 192; *Ryan*v. *Scanlon,*117 Conn. 428. See also, anno. 28 A. L. R. (2d) 12, 62-69. The defendant’s motion should be granted or denied according to the findings of fact which the trial court makes upon the evidence.

*Remanded.*

All concurred.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

In re: 

Robert P Flynn

Debtor(s)

Case No. 16 B 24643

CHAPTER 13 STANDING TRUSTEE’S FINAL REPORT AND ACCOUNT

Marilyn O. Marshall, chapter 13 trustee, submits the following Final Report and Account 

of the administration of the estate pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1302(b)(1). The trustee declares as 

follows:

1) The case was filed on 08/01/2016.

2) The plan was confirmed on NA .

3) The plan was modified by order after confirmation pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1329 on

NA .

4) The trustee filed action to remedy default by the debtor in performance under the plan 

on NA .

5) The case was Dismissed on 09/15/2016.

6) Number of months from filing to last payment: 0.

7) Number of months case was pending: 3.

8) Total value of assets abandoned by court order: NA .

9) Total value of assets exempted: NA .

10) Amount of unsecured claims discharged without payment: $0.00.

11) All checks distributed by the trustee relating to this case have cleared the bank.

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (9/1/2009)

Case 16-24643 Doc 13 Filed 11/15/16 Entered 11/15/16 15:23:25 Desc Page 1

 of 3
Receipts:

Total paid by or on behalf of the debtor $0.00

Less amount refunded to debtor $0.00

NET RECEIPTS: $0.00

Expenses of Administration:

Attorney’s Fees Paid Through the Plan $0.00

Court Costs $0.00

Trustee Expenses & Compensation $0.00

Other $0.00

TOTAL EXPENSES OF ADMINISTRATION: $0.00

Attorney fees paid and disclosed by debtor: $0.00

Scheduled Creditors:

Creditor

Name Class

Claim

Scheduled

Claim

Asserted

Claim

Allowed

Int.

Paid

Principal

Paid

Summary of Disbursements to Creditors:

Secured Payments:

Mortgage Ongoing

Mortgage Arrearage

Debt Secured by Vehicle

All Other Secured

TOTAL SECURED:

Priority Unsecured Payments:

Domestic Support Arrearage

Domestic Support Ongoing

All Other Priority

TOTAL PRIORITY:

GENERAL UNSECURED PAYMENTS:

Claim

Allowed

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Principal

Paid

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Interest

Paid

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (9/1/2009)

Case 16-24643 Doc 13 Filed 11/15/16 Entered 11/15/16 15:23:25 Desc Page 2

 of 3
Disbursements:

Expenses of Administration $0.00

Disbursements to Creditors $0.00

TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS : $0.00

12) The trustee certifies that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 5009, 

the estate has been fully administered, the foregoing summary is true and complete, and all 

administrative matters for which the trustee is responsible have been completed. The trustee 

requests a final decree be entered that discharges the trustee and grants such other relief as may 

be just and proper.

Dated: 11/15/2016

STATEMENT: This Unified Form is associated with an open bankruptcy case, therefore, Paperwork Reduction 

Act exemption 5 C.F.R. § 1320.4(a)(2) applies.

By:/s/ Marilyn O. Marshall

Trustee

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (9/1/2009)

Case 16-24643 Doc 13 Filed 11/15/16 Entered 11/15/16 15:23:25 Desc Page 3

 of 3
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of WebMediaBrands Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donald J. O’Neill, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Donald J. O’NeillDonald J. O’NeillVice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer)May 13, 2011
§ 90.691 Emission mask requirements for EA-based systems. ( a ) Out-of-band emission requirement shall apply only to the “outer” channels included in an EA license and to spectrum adjacent to interior channels used by incumbent licensees. The emission limits are as follows: ( 1 ) For any frequency removed from the EA licensee's frequency block by up to and including 37.5 kHz, the power of any emission shall be attenuated below the transmitter power (P) in watts by at least 116 Log10(f/6.1) decibels or 50 + 10 Log10(P) decibels or 80 decibels, whichever is the lesser attenuation, where f is the frequency removed from the center of the outer channel in the block in kilohertz and where f is greater than 12.5 kHz.
( 2 ) For any frequency removed from the EA licensee's frequency block greater than 37.5 kHz, the power of any emission shall be attenuated below the transmitter power (P) in watts by at least 43 + 10Log10(P) decibels or 80 decibels, whichever is the lesser attenuation, where f is the frequency removed from the center of the outer channel in the block in kilohertz and where f is greater than 37.5 kHz.
( b ) When an emission outside of the authorized bandwidth causes harmful interference, the Commission may, at its discretion, require greater attenuation than specified in this section.
#### § 402.30 Definitions.

The definitions in § 402.02 are applicable to this subpart. In addition, the following definitions are applicable only to this subpart.

*Action Agency* refers to the Department of Agriculture Forest Service (FS) or the Department of the Interior Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), or National Park Service (NPS).

*Alternative Consultation Agreement* (ACA) is the agreement described in § 402.33 of this subpart.

*Fire Plan Project* is an action determined by the Action Agency to be within the scope of the NFP as defined in this section.

*National Fire Plan* (NFP) is the September 8, 2000, report to the President from the Departments of the Interior and Agriculture entitled “Managing the Impact of Wildfire on Communities and the Environment” outlining a new approach to managing fires, together with the accompanying budget requests, strategies, plans, and direction, or any amendments thereto.

*Service Director* refers to the FWS Director or the Assistant Administrator for Fisheries for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
# EUR-Lex - 12002E085 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E085

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Three: Community policies - Title VI: Common rules on competition, taxation and approximation of laws - Chapter 1: Rules on competition - Section 1: Rules applying to undertakings - Article 85 - Article 89 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - Article 89 - EEC Treaty **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0066 - 0066 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0210 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0029 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Three: Community policies

Title VI: Common rules on competition, taxation and approximation of laws

Chapter 1: Rules on competition

Section 1: Rules applying to undertakings

Article 85

Article 89 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 89 - EEC Treaty

Article 85

1. Without prejudice to Article 84, the Commission shall ensure the application of the principles laid down in Articles 81 and 82. On application by a Member State or on its own initiative, and in cooperation with the competent authorities in the Member States, which shall give it their assistance, the Commission shall investigate cases of suspected infringement of these principles. If it finds that there has been an infringement, it shall propose appropriate measures to bring it to an end.

2. If the infringement is not brought to an end, the Commission shall record such infringement of the principles in a reasoned decision. The Commission may publish its decision and authorise Member States to take the measures, the conditions and details of which it shall determine, needed to remedy the situation.
§ 228.17 Direct testimony. ( a ) Only direct testimony submitted by affidavit as provided in these regulations and introduced at the hearing by a witness shall be considered part of the record. Such direct testimony shall not be read into evidence but shall become a part of the record subject to exclusion of irrelevant and immaterial parts thereof;
( b ) The witness introducing direct testimony shall: ( 1 ) State his or her name, address and occupation;
( 2 ) State qualifications for introducing the direct testimony. If an expert, the witness shall briefly state the scientific or technical training which qualifies the witness as an expert;
( 3 ) Identify the direct testimony previously submitted in accordance with these regulations; and
( 4 ) Submit to appropriate cross and direct examination. Cross-examination shall be by a party whose interests are adverse on the issue presented, to the witness', if the witness is a party, or to the interests of the party who presented the witness.
( c ) A party shall be deemed to have waived the right to introduce direct testimony if such party fails to present a witness to introduce the direct testimony.
( d ) Official notice may be taken of such matters as are judicially noticed by the courts of the United States: Provided, that parties shall be given adequate notice, by the presiding officer, at the hearing, of matters so noticed and shall be given adequate opportunity to show that such facts are inaccurate or are erroneously noticed.
Case 16-24758    Doc 21    Filed 08/22/16    Entered 08/22/16 12:43:51    Desc Main Document      Page 1 of 6

Case 16-24758    Doc 21    Filed 08/22/16    Entered 08/22/16 12:43:51    Desc Main Document      Page 2 of 6

Case 16-24758    Doc 21    Filed 08/22/16    Entered 08/22/16 12:43:51    Desc Main Document      Page 3 of 6

Case 16-24758    Doc 21    Filed 08/22/16    Entered 08/22/16 12:43:51    Desc Main Document      Page 4 of 6

Case 16-24758    Doc 21    Filed 08/22/16    Entered 08/22/16 12:43:51    Desc Main Document      Page 5 of 6

Case 16-24758    Doc 21    Filed 08/22/16    Entered 08/22/16 12:43:51    Desc Main Document      Page 6 of 6
# EUR-Lex - 11965F006 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11965F006

**TREATY ESTABLISHING A SINGLE COUNCIL AND A SINGLE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, CHAPTER I: THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, ARTICLE 6 **

*
Official Journal L 152 , 13/07/1967 P. 0004 *

++++

ARTICLE 6

THE COUNCIL SHALL , ACTING BY A QUALIFIED MAJORITY , DETERMINE THE SALARIES , ALLOWANCES AND PENSIONS OF THE PRESIDENT AND MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION , AND OF THE PRESIDENT , JUDGES , ADVOCATES-GENERAL AND REGISTRAR OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE . IT SHALL ALSO , AGAIN BY A QUALIFIED MAJORITY , DETERMINE ANY PAYMENT TO BE MADE INSTEAD OF REMUNERATION .
Exhibit 32.1
 
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 I, William S. Rosenstadt, Chief Executive Officer, President and Acting Principal Accounting Officer of Lone Pine Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
 
 (1)           the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended  June 30, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date: August 18, 2009
 
 /s/  William S. Rosenstadt
 Name: William S. Rosenstadt
 Title: CEO, President and Principal Accounting Officer
Case 16-29065 Doc 4 Filed 09/12/16 Entered 09/12/16 16:49:10 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-29065 Doc 4 Filed 09/12/16 Entered 09/12/16 16:49:10 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2