alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"New Petitions and Appeals - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ockXD4flkl\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/case-information\/case-filings\/new-petitions-and-appeals\/\">New Petitions and Appeals<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/case-information\/case-filings\/new-petitions-and-appeals\/embed\/#?secret=ockXD4flkl\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“New Petitions and Appeals” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"ockXD4flkl\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Where to File Appeals from a U.S. District Court, the U.S. Court of International Trade, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims (excluding vaccine compensation cases), and the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims are initiated by filing a notice of appeal and paying the docketing and filing fee with these courts\u2019 respective clerk\u2019s offices. […]"}
Editorial Note on Part 97
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 97 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 97.115 Third party communications. ( a ) An amateur station may transmit messages for a third party to: ( 1 ) Any station within the jurisdiction of the United States.
( 2 ) Any station within the jurisdiction of any foreign government when transmitting emergency or disaster relief communications and any station within the jurisdiction of any foreign government whose administration has made arrangements with the United States to allow amateur stations to be used for transmitting international communications on behalf of third parties. No station shall transmit messages for a third party to any station within the jurisdiction of any foreign government whose administration has not made such an arrangement. This prohibition does not apply to a message for any third party who is eligible to be a control operator of the station.
( b ) The third party may participate in stating the message where: ( 1 ) The control operator is present at the control point and is continuously monitoring and supervising the third party's participation; and
( 2 ) The third party is not a prior amateur service licensee whose license was revoked or not renewed after hearing and re-licensing has not taken place; suspended for less than the balance of the license term and the suspension is still in effect; suspended for the balance of the license term and re-licensing has not taken place; or surrendered for cancellation following notice of revocation, suspension or monetary forfeiture proceedings. The third party may not be the subject of a cease and desist order which relates to amateur service operation and which is still in effect.
( c ) No station may transmit third party communications while being automatically controlled except a station transmitting a RTTY or data emission.
( d ) At the end of an exchange of international third party communications, the station must also transmit in the station identification procedure the call sign of the station with which a third party message was exchanged.
[54 FR 25857, June 20, 1989; 54 FR 39535, Sept. 27, 1989, as amended at 71 FR 25982, May 3, 2006; 71 FR 66462, Nov. 15, 2006]
#### §§ 218.38-218.39 [Reserved]
# EUR-Lex - 11957E109H - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957E109H

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY - PART THREE : COMMUNITY POLICIES - TITLE VI : ECONOMIC AND MONETARY POLICY - CHAPTER 3 : INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS - ARTICLE 109H **

*
Official Journal C 191 , 29/07/1992 P. 0019 *

Article 109h

1. Where a Member State is in difficulties or is seriously threatened with difficulties as regards its balance of payments either as a result of an overall disequilibrium in its balance of payments, or as a result of the type of currency at its disposal, and where such difficulties are liable in particular to jeopardize the functioning of the common market or the progressive implementation of the common commercial policy, the Commission shall immediately investigate the position of the State in question and the action which, making use of all the means at its disposal, that State has taken or may take in accordance with the provisions of this Treaty. The Commission shall state what measures it recommends the State concerned to take.

If the action taken by a Member State and the measures suggested by the Commission do not prove sufficient to overcome the difficulties which have arisen or which threaten, the Commission shall, after consulting the Committee referred to in Article 109c, recommend to the Council the granting of mutual assistance and appropriate methods therefor.

The Commission shall keep the Council regularly informed of the situation and of how it is developing.

2. The Council, acting by a qualified majority, shall grant such mutual assistance; it shall adopt directives or decisions laying down the conditions and details of such assistance, which may take such forms as:

(a) a concerted approach to or within any other international organizations to which Member States may have recourse;

(b) measures needed to avoid deflection of trade where the State which is in difficulties maintains or reintroduces quantitative restrictions against third countries;

(c) the granting of limited credits by other Member States, subject to their agreement.

3. If the mutual assistance recommended by the Commission is not granted by the Council or if the mutual assistance granted and the measures taken are insufficient, the Commission shall authorize the State which is in difficulties to take protective measures, the conditions and details of which the Commission shall determine.

Such authorization may be revoked and such conditions and details may be changed by the Council acting by a qualified majority.

4. Subject to Article 109k(6), this Article shall cease to apply from the beginning of the third stage.
§ 221.72 May I file a revised proposed alternative? ( a ) Within 20 days after issuance of the ALJ's decision under § 221.60, you may file with the Office of Habitat Conservation, at the address set forth in § 221.2, a revised proposed alternative condition or prescription if: ( 1 ) You previously filed a proposed alternative that met the requirements of § 221.71; and
( 2 ) Your revised proposed alternative is designed to respond to one or more findings of fact by the ALJ.
( b ) Your revised proposed alternative must: ( 1 ) Satisfy the content requirements for a proposed alternative under § 221.71(b); and
( 2 ) Identify the specific ALJ finding(s) to which the revised proposed alternative is designed to respond and how the revised proposed alternative differs from the original alternative.
( c ) Filing a revised proposed alternative will constitute a withdrawal of the previously filed proposed alternative.
# EUR-Lex - 11992E025 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11992E025

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY - PART THREE: COMMUNITY POLICIES - TITLE I: FREE MOVEMENT OF GOODS - CHAPTER I: THE CUSTOMS UNION - SECTION 2: SETTING UP OF THE COMMON CUSTOMS TARIFF - ARTICLE 25 /* CODIFIED VERSION OF THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY */ **

*
Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0014 *

Article 25

1. If the Commission finds that the production in Member States of particular products contained in Lists B, C and D is insufficient to supply the demands of one of the Member States, and that such supply traditionally depends to a considerable extent on imports from third countries, the Council shall, acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission, grant the Member State concerned tariff quotas at a reduced rate of duty or duty free.

Such quotas may not exceed the limits beyond which the risk might arise of activities being transferred to the detriment of other Member States.

2. In the case of the products in List E, and of those in List G for which the rates of duty have been determined in accordance with the procedure provided for in the third paragraph of Article 20, the Commission shall, where a change in sources of supply or shortage of supplies within the Community is such as to entail harmful consequences for the processing industries of a Member State, at the request of that Member State, grant it tariff quotas at a reduced rate of duty or duty free.

Such quotas may not exceed the limits beyond which the risk might arise of activities being transferred to the detriment of other Member States.

3. In the case of the products listed in Annex II to this Treaty, the Commission may authorize any Member State to suspend, in whole or in part, collection of the duties applicable or may grant such Member State tariff quotas at a reduced rate of duty or duty free, provided that no serious disturbance of the market of the products concerned results therefrom.

4. The Commission shall periodically examine tariff quotas granted pursuant to this Article.
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5156 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5156

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
          Technical correction to the Food Stamp Act of 1977.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTION RELATING TO UNIFORM REIMBURSEMENT RATES 
              UNDER FOOD STAMP PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 16(g) of the Food Stamp Act of 1977 (7 
U.S.C. 2025(g)) is amended by striking ``an amount'' and all that 
follows through ``October 1, 1991, of'' and inserting ``the amount 
provided under subsection (a)(6) for''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall be 
effective as if included in section 13961 of the Omnibus Budget 
Reconciliation Act of 1993 (Public Law 103-66; 107 Stat. 679).

            Passed the House of Representatives October 4, 1994.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.
                                     







103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5156

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

          Technical correction to the Food Stamp Act of 1977.`
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jupitermedia Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alan M. Meckler, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ Alan M. Meckler                 
|Alan M. Meckler                     
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|November 9, 2005                    



This certification is made solely
for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. § 1350, subject to the knowledge standard therein, and not for any other purpose.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10(b)  
 
Amendment to Wells Fargo & Company Supplemental 401(k) Plan


The first sentence of Section 24 of the Wells Fargo & Company Supplemental 401(k) Plan is amended effective January 1, 2020 to read in full as follows:


For purposes of Section 3(16)(A) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), as amended, the Plan Administrator shall be the Director of Human Resources and the Director of Compensation and Benefits of the Company, each of whom, acting individually, may take action as the Plan Administrator.
# EUR-Lex - 11994N149 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11994N149

**ACT concerning the conditions of accession of the Kingdom of Norway, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded - PART FOUR : TRANSITIONAL MEASURES - TITLE VI : AGRICULTURE - CHAPTER 2 : Other provisions - Article 149 **

*
Official Journal C 241 , 29/08/1994 P. 0047 *

Article 149

1. If transitional measures are necessary to facilitate the transition from the existing regime in the new Member States to that resulting from application of the common organization of the markets under the conditions set out in this Title, such measures shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 38 of Regulation No 136/66/EEC or, as appropriate, in the corresponding Articles of the other Regulations on the common organization of agricultural markets. These measures may be taken during a period expiring on 31 December 1997 and their application shall be limited to that date.

2. The Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament, may extend the period referred to in paragraph 1.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       8,394,607
<SECURITIES>                                 9,013,522
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,513,577
<ALLOWANCES>                                    50,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,191,283
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            20,197,183
<PP&E>                                       4,744,582
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,432,257
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,887,740
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,335,764
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    24,648,913
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,887,740
<SALES>                                      5,540,408
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,540,408
<CGS>                                        3,788,584
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,644,917
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           (1,893,093)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (285,166)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,359,872)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.35)
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

       I, Thomas L. Gruber, certify that:

       1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of I/OMagic
Corporation;

       2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

       3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

       4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [language omitted pursuant to SEC
Release 34-47986] for the registrant and have:

              (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

              (b) [Omitted pursuant to SEC Release 34-47986];

              (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

              (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over the financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter
in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.

       5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

              (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

              (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 13, 2007

/s/ THOMAS L. GRUBER
------------------------------------
Thomas L. Gruber,
Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)
Page I of2

RE: NRG facilities

T,^ f å1"*, 

Kathrvn (S.Portland,ME-US)

Bill Maxwell

ßD4njll03:2ó PM

Cc:

"Kopacz, Richard (Windsor,CT-US)'

Hide Delails

From: "Brown, Kathryn (S.Portlan{ME-US)" <KBrown@trcsolutions.com>

To: Bill MaxwelVRTPruSEPAruS@EPA

Cc: "Kopacz, Richard (Windso¡CT-US)" <RKopacz@trcsolutions.com>

History: This message has been replied to.

4 Attachments

T rgì...I

inageool.gif 5ó2-Unit-2-EmisTmMethods_update0324l l.xls 546_Unit_S_EmisTesMethods_update0324l l.xls 548_UnitJ_Em¡sTestMethods_updat4324l Lxls

[,!r N¡awell,

wæ recently broughl to my atttrhon that thse is an eror ¡n how the [¡ethod 308 lblMN¡Btu il¡ssion rate was calculaled for the following NRG fscititis:

NRG t\4iddleloM (EPA-HO-OAR-2009-0234-0765)

NRG Noealk (EPA-HO-OAR-2009-0234-0767)

NRG N.lonlville (EPA-HO-OAR-2009-0234-2530)

We wuld like to update the approprìate dockels wlh the corrected e¡nisslon rats æ attached to this snell ed summarized below in bold rad fonl.

EIA Facillty

MqqtetoM rowq

562 Slatim 2

Run

Number Tost Start Detê

Test

Stút

T¡me

Têst End

Date

Tæt

End

Tlmo

lotal VÐt Phæe Mêrcurv Emlßabn T6l R6uhÊ

Measu16d

Value

(ug/dscm)

86ls

(Wot or

Dry)

TeBt

Mêthod

Us€d

Data

Flag

(ADL,

BDtDDLI

Tost Method

Cmmerits (lbrmmBtu)

412212010 06:38 u2212010 OA'34 olì4l ntu

U.S. EPA

f\rethod

3lìFt ADL 3.e9E{r8

u))12Mî fìn íì 4t2U2010 10 50 0.045 Dry

U.S. EPA

f\,lethod

MR ADI Àí'FÆ

3 4122120'lo l1 :00 412212010 13:00 0 057 Dry

U.ù. tsPA

t\rethod

..¡B ADL 5.15E.{¡8

file://C:\Documents and Settings\bmaxwell\Local Settings\Temp\notes87944B\-web4028.... 3l30l20Il
Page2 of2

EIA Faclllty Bollor Cods Facllltv Nme lD ffi

Run

Number Test Start Dato

Test

Strt

Tlms

TeBt End

Dâto

Tost End

Tlme

Total VaDor Phase Morcury Emissþn Test Rosults

Moasuaed

Valus

(ugy'dBGm)

Ba3iB

(Wet a

Drvl

Tæt

Method

UBêd

uqa

Flag

(ADL,

BDL,

hñt ì

Tæt ilethod

Colnments (lb/mmBhr)

6J412010 1Ot52 â1412010 2:52 0 056 Drv

lì,lethod

SR ADL 6.02E{t8

2 Êt¿trõ1õ la )t âJ¿l)õ1n 15 22 o tì¿5 Dry

U.ù. ETA

ftrethod

ADL ¿-75E{t8

d412010 15:50 61412010 17:50 0.048 Dru

Method

?tìFt Ân Á qnF¡n

file://C:\Documents and Settings\bmaxwell\Local Settings\Ternp\notes87944B\-web4028.... 3/3012011
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Rochester Medical Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
David A. Jonas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | 
| |  | 

| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ David A. Jonas

David A. JonasChief Financial OfficerDecember 17, 2003
Case 16-24642 Doc 15 Filed 08/17/16 Entered 08/18/16 11:40:04 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
Case 16-28942 Doc 13 Filed 09/28/16 Entered 09/29/16 07:34:11 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1