alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Leisse v. The St. Louis & Iron Mountain Railroad Company, *Appellant.*

1. Eminent Domain. The right of eminent domain resides in the State, and may be enforced, not only in behalf of the State, but of any artificial person clothed with a franchise, the enjoyment of which promotes a public use. The basis of the enforcement is the necessity for the public use of the property the taking of which is sought.

2. -: ABANDONMENT OF PROCEEDINGS : DAMAGES. If proceedings *562are instituted to condemn for public use the property of an individual, and after the value of the property is ascertained by inquest, the proceedings are abandoned because the price assessed is unsatisfactory, the corporation instituting such proceedings will be answerable to the owner for all damages occasioned by them.

3. -:-: remedy op joint owners. Where property, against which proceedings to condemn for public use have been instituted and afterward abandoned, belonged to A & B, co-tenants, who in resisting the proceedings employed different counsel, who severally attended to the management of the case; *Held,*that it was error to permit them to sue jointly to recover damages for counsel fees.

4. -: -: damages. In an action to recover damages for the institution of proceedings to condemn private property for public use, money need not have been actually paid out to entitle plaintiff to recover; but if a debt has been created by reason of such proceedings, a damage has been incurred for which an action will lie.*

*Appeal from, St. Louis Court of Appeals.*

Affirmed.

*Thoroughman & Pike*for appellant.

*E. T. Farish*and *Louis Gottschalk*for respondent.

*

These syllabi are taken from 2 Mo. App. p. 105.

Hough, J.

This was an action to recover damages resulting from the institution and discontinuance by the defendant of certain proceedings for the condemnation of a parcel of ground in the city of St. Louis, belonging to the plaintiff. The plaintiff recovered judgment in the circuit court, which was affirmed by the court of appeals, and the defendant has appealed to this court. This case was twice before the court of appeals. The first decision of the court is to be found in 2 Mo. App. Rep. p. 105, where all the questions involved in this litigation are discussed in a most exhaustive and satisfactory manner. The opinion of the court of appeals when the case was before it the second time, is not reported at length, but a statement of the point decided therein is to be found in 5 Mo. App. Rep. p. 585. Being satisfied after a careful examina*563tion of the record before us, that this cause was tried and the judgment therein rendered in strict conformity to the views expressed by the court of appeals when it was first before that tribunal, in which views we fully concur, the judgment of the court of appeals will be affirmed.

The other judges concur, except Sherwood, C. J., dissenting.
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Drew Bonnell, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Eden Energy Corp.
      for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Eden Energy Corp.                                                                     

Dated: November 13, 2008

/s/ Drew Bonnell Drew
BonnellSecretary, Treasurer and CFO(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer) Eden Energy Corp.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Eden Energy
Corp. and will be retained by Eden Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
§ 29.21-5 Construction. ( a ) If construction is not commenced within two (2) years after date of right-of-way grant, the right-of-way may be canceled by the Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service at his discretion.
( b ) Proof of construction: Upon completion of construction, the applicant shall file a certification of completion with the Regional Director.
[42 FR 43919, Aug. 31, 1977]
Exhibit











Exhibit 10.5














Exhibit 10.5








April 10, 2020


Frank C. Orsini 
intentionally omitted
intentionally omitted


Dear Frank:


This letter agreement (this “Amendment”) shall supplement and amend the Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and between you and Lear Corporation (the “Corporation”), dated as of March 1, 2018 (as may have been previously amended, the “Employment Agreement”).  All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Employment Agreement. This Amendment confirms certain adjustments to your annual base salary in connection with the Corporation’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic.  Specifically, your annual base salary will be reduced by five percent during the period beginning April 16, 2020 and ending on December 31, 2020 (such period, the “Waiver Period”).  In addition, twenty percent of your annual base salary otherwise payable during the Waiver Period will be deferred and paid to you during the period commencing on April 30, 2022 and ending on July 31, 2022, subject to accelerated payment if certain conditions are met; provided, that you remain continuously employed with the Corporation through the applicable payment date. 


The foregoing adjustments to your base salary shall be disregarded solely for purposes of calculating any Severance Payment that may become payable to you under the Employment Agreement in the event that you incur a qualifying termination of employment with the Corporation during the Waiver Period. In such event, the Severance Payment will be calculated based on your annual base salary as in effect immediately prior to the Waiver Period.


You hereby consent to the terms set forth in this Amendment and acknowledge and agree that the terms set forth herein do not constitute, and you hereby waive any right you may have to resign for, Good Reason pursuant to your Employment Agreement. Except as modified by this Amendment, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect; provided, that in the event that any provision in this Amendment conflicts with the Employment Agreement or any other agreement, policy, plan or arrangement between the Company and you, the terms of this Amendment shall govern.  Please sign on the following page where indicated.


Sincerely, 


LEAR CORPORATION


By:  /s/ Harry Kemp
Name:    Harry Kemp
Title: SVP, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary




Acknowledged and agreed as of the 10th day of April 2020:




/s/ Frank C. Orsini_____________________________
Name: Frank C. Orsini
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5292

AN ACT

To amend the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act

of 1990 to extend the deadline for the submission of

nominations for the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUBMISSION OF NOMINATIONS FOR DEFENSE

4 BASE CLOSURE AND REALIGNMENT COMMIS5 SION.

6 Section 2902(c)(1)(B)(iii) of the Defense Base Clo7 sure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX
2

•HR 5292 EH

1 of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) is amended

2 by striking out ‘‘January 3, 1995’’ and inserting in lieu

3 thereof ‘‘January 4, 1995’’.

Passed the House of Representatives November 29,

1994.

Attest:

Clerk.

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5292

AN ACT

To amend the Defense Base Closure and RealignClosure and Realignment Commission. submission of nominations for the Defense Base ment Act of 1990 to extend the deadline for the
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 4.12


                               SECOND AMENDMENT TO
                                CREDIT AGREEMENT
                                ----------------

                This Second Amendment to Credit Agreement is made and entered
into this 30 day of December, 1996, by and between EVERFLOW EASTERN, INC., an
Ohio corporation (the "Company"), EVERFLOW EASTERN PARTNERS, L.P., a Delaware
limited partnership (the "Partnerships") (the Company and the Partnership being
referred to collectively as the "Borrower"), and BANK ONE, TEXAS, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, a national banking association (the "Lender").

                  RECITALS:
                  ---------

                Borrower and Lender have entered into a Credit Agreement dated
January 19, 1995, pursuant to which Lender has agreed to make loans to
Borrower upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Credit Agreement.
Borrower and Lender have agreed, and by this Amendment, do hereby agree to
further amend the Credit Agreement so as to extend the terms of this Agreement
and the loans made thereunder.

                  NOW, THEREFORE, the Credit Agreement is amended in the
following respects:

                  1. The definition of "Commitment Termination Date" in
Section 1.2 is amended to read as follows:

                    "Commitment Termination Date" shall mean November 1, 1998."

                  2.  In all other respects, the terms and provisions of the 
Credit Agreement are hereby confirmed.



                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Second Amendment has been executed by
the parties on the date first above written, but effective for all purposes, as
of December 31, 1996.


BANK ONE, TEXAS, NATIONAL                  EVERFLOW EASTERN, INC.
ASSOCIATION


By: /s/ James S. Bolinger                  By:  /s/ William A. Siskovic
   -----------------------------              -----------------------------
   James S. Bolinger, Vice President       Its:  Vice President


                                           EVERFLOW EASTERN PARTNERS, L.P.

                                           By:  Everflow Management Company,
                                                  its general partner


                                           By:  Everflow Management Corporation

                                           By: /s/ William A. Siskovic
                                              -------------------------------
                                           Its:  Vice President
Document

FIRST AMENDMENT TO
ZAGG INC
AMENDED AND RESTATED 2013 EQUITY INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN 
 
This Amendment (“Amendment”) to the ZAGG Inc Amended and Restated 2013 Equity Incentive Award Plan (the “Plan”), is adopted by the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of ZAGG Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), as of April 15, 2020. Capitalized terms used in this Amendment and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Plan. 


RECITALS


A.The Company currently maintains the Plan;


B.Pursuant to Section 14.1 of the Plan, the Committee has the authority to amend the Plan in any respect from time to time, subject to certain restrictions; and


C.The Committee desires to amend the Plan as set forth herein.


AMENDMENT


Effective as of the date set forth above, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:


1.Section 10.10.  Section 10.10 of the Plan is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following:


“10.10 Minimum Vesting.  Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein, at the time of grant, no Award will be granted that vests (or, if applicable, is exercisable) until at least twelve (12) months following the date of grant of the Award; provided, however, that shares subject to the following Awards must not meet the foregoing vesting (and, if applicable, exercisability) requirements: (i) up to five percent (5%) of the shares of Stock authorized for issuance under this Plan, and (ii) Awards granted to an Independent Director, including in lieu of or in exchange for cash compensation otherwise payable to such Independent Director.


2.This Amendment shall be and is hereby incorporated in and forms a part of the Plan.


3.Except as expressly provided herein, all terms and conditions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.




[Signature Page Follows]


















        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereby certify that the foregoing Amendment was duly adopted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of ZAGG Inc on the date and year above first written.




ZAGG INC
           
By: /s/ ABBY BARRACLOUGH
Abby Barraclough
Board Secretary


Date: April 15, 2020


|
#### § 453.01 Purpose.

This part prescribes the procedures to be used by the Endangered Species Committee when examining applications for exemption from section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended.
N. Y. SUPERIOR COURT.

#### William H. Ball and others agt. Milton A. Goodenough and others.

An application for the appointment of a *receiver in supplementary*proceedings, must be made to the judge who granted the order of reference, and appointed the referee.

The order should be a chamber order and filed with the clerk of the city and county of New York; and it is only from the time the receiver receives a copy of the order, certified by the county clerk that he has any power to act at all.

The judge in such an order has no authority to direct an assignment of personal property, and can only forbid the transfer of debts owning to the judgment debt» • or, until the receiver can sue.

*Special Term, August,*1869.

The plaintiff in this case instituted supplementary proceedings against the defendants to collect a judgment recovered by them against the defendants, and for that purpose procured an order from his Honor Judge Monell, requiring the defendants to appear and be examined concerning their property, it appears that afterwards the' plaintiffs procured an order from his Honor Judge Freedman, appointing a I’eceiver of the property of the judgment debtor.

Mr. H. C. Denison, *counsel for the judgment*debtor,

moved to vacate the order on the ground, that under the Code, Judge Freedman had no power to make the order, and that Judge Monell, who granted the original order for the examination of the judgment debtor, was the proper judge to appoint the receivér.

McCunn, J.

The rule is now settled that an application for the appointment of a receiver must be made to the judge who granted the order of reference,and who appointed *480the referee to examine as to the property of the judgment debtor. No other judge out of court has the power. Such was *(Code*398) the practice as held in the case of *Smith and another*agt. *Johnson,*(7 *How. R.,*39). Again, the Code requires that the order should be a chamber order, and that the same must be filed with the clerk-of the city and county of New York ; and it is only from the time the receiver receives a copy of the order, certified by the county clerk that he has any power to act at all. The judge in an order appointing a receiver has no authority to direct an assignment.of personal property; and in respect to debts owing to the judgment debtor, can only forbid any transfer or other disposition of them until an opportunity be given the receiver to sue. *(People*agt. *Hurlbert,*5 *How. Pr. R.,*446; 9 *N.Y. Leg. Observer,*245.) Motion granted.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5100 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5100

 To amend the Commodity Exchange Act to prohibit political election or 
        contest agreements, contracts, transactions, and swaps.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 18, 2024

     Mr. Merkley (for himself, Mr. Van Hollen, and Mr. Whitehouse) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
           Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Commodity Exchange Act to prohibit political election or 
        contest agreements, contracts, transactions, and swaps.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ban Gambling on Elections Act of 
2024''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON POLITICAL ELECTION OR CONTEST AGREEMENTS, 
              CONTRACTS, TRANSACTIONS, AND SWAPS.

    Section 5c(c)(5) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 7a-
2(c)(5)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(D) Prohibition relating to political elections 
                or contests.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
                this section, no agreement, contract, transaction, or 
                swap involving any political election or contest (or 
                any index, measure, value, or data related thereto, or 
                occurrence, extent of an occurrence, or contingency 
                based thereon) may be listed or made available for 
                clearing or trading on or through a registered 
                entity.''.
                                 <all>
```
# EUR-Lex - 12003T051 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12003T051

**Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded - Part five : Provisions relating to the implementation of this Act - Title I : Setting up of the Institutions and Bodies - Article 51 **

*
Official Journal L 236 , 23/09/2003 P. 0048 - 0048 *

Article 51

Adaptations to the rules of the Committees established by the original Treaties and to their rules of procedure, necessitated by the accession, shall be made as soon as possible after accession.

--------------------------------------------------
§ 452.03 Threshold review and determinations. ( a ) *Threshold determinations.* Within 20 days after receiving an exemption application, or a longer time agreed upon between the exemption applicant and the Secretary, the Secretary shall conclude his review and determine: ( 1 ) Whether any required biological assessment was conducted;
( 2 ) To the extent determinable within the time period provided, whether the Federal agency and permit or license applicant, if any, have refrained from making any irreversible or irretrievable commitment of resources; and
( 3 ) Whether the Federal agency and permit or license applicant, if any, have carried out consultation responsibilities in good faith and have made a reasonable and responsible effort to develop and fairly consider modifications or reasonable and prudent alternatives to the proposed action which would not violate section 7(a)(2) of the Act.
( b ) *Burden of proof.* The exemption applicant has the burden of proving that the requirements of § 452.03(a) have been met.
( c ) *Negative finding.* If the Secretary makes a negative finding on any threshold determination, the Secretary shall deny the application and notify the exemption applicant in writing of his finding and grounds therefor. The exemption process shall terminate when the applicant receives such written notice. The Secretary's denial shall constitute final agency action for purposes of judicial review under chapter 7 of title 5 of the United States Code.
( d ) *Positive finding.* If the Secretary makes a positive finding on each of the threshold determinations, he shall notify the exemption applicant in writing that the application qualifies for consideration by the Endangered Species Committee.
( e ) *Secretary of State opinion.* The Secretary shall terminate the exemption process immediately if the Secretary of State, pursuant to his obligations under section 7(i) of the Act, certifies in writing to the Committee that granting an exemption and carrying out the proposed action would violate an international treaty obligation or other international obligation of the United States.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10** 
**- 1611** 

HENRY LEWIS ASTROP ,
Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

ECKERD CORPORATION; RITE AID CORPORATION ,
Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Cour t for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. ( 3:09

- cv
- 00681

- RLW )

Submitted : October 6, 2010 Decided: October 14, 2010

Before WILKINSON, KING, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Henry Lewis Astrop, Appellant Pro Se. Dannel Charles Duddy, William Tiller, TILLER LAW GROUP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Henry Lewis Astrop app eals the district court ’ s order
dismissing his complaint . We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Astrop v. Eckerd Corp. , No.

3:09

- cv
- 00681

- RLW (E.D. Va. Apr. 29 & 30 , 2010) . We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5177

To authorize the Secretary of State to deny passports to noncustodial parents

subject to State arrest warrants in cases of nonpayment of child support.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 5, 1994

Ms. SNOWE (for herself and Mr. ANDREWS of New Jersey) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of State to deny passports to

noncustodial parents subject to State arrest warrants

in cases of nonpayment of child support.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DENIAL OF PASSPORTS TO NONCUSTODIAL

4 PARENTS SUBJECT TO STATE ARREST WAR5 RANTS IN CASES OF NONPAYMENT OF CHILD

6 SUPPORT.

7 The Secretary of State is authorized to refuse a pass8 port or revoke, restrict, or limit a passport in any case

9 in which the Secretary of State determines or is informed

10 by competent authority that the applicant or passport
2

•HR 5177 IH

1 holder is a noncustodial parent who is the subject of an

2 outstanding State warrant of arrest for nonpayment of

3 child support, where the amount in controversy is not less

4 than $10,000.

Æ
#### § 12.52 Can I file a petition for remission for my abandoned property?

You may file a petition for remission of abandoned property with the Service and seek the return of property you had voluntarily abandoned, within the time period described in § 12.33. If you have agreed to abandon property, your right to seek relief is limited to whatever process expressly was reserved in the abandonment document you signed.