alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
G. BRAD BECKSTEAD
---------------------------
Certified Public Accountant

                                                  330 E. Warm Springs
                                                 Las Vegas, NV  89119
                                                         702.528.1984
                                                  425.928.2877 (efax)



May 15, 2001


To Whom It May Concern:

The firm of G. Brad Beckstead, CPA, consents to the inclusion of my report
of May 15, 2001, on the Financial Statements of Emporia Systems for the
three months ending March 31, 2001, in any filings which are necessary now
or in the near future to be filed with the US Securities and Exchange
Commission.

Signed,

/s/  G. Brad Beckstead
----------------------
G. Brad Beckstead, CPA


<PAGE>
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0447Building a 311 System: A Case Study of the Orange County, Florida, Government Service CenterLaw enforcement executives and agencies and public safety communications organizations interested in learning about what is involved when establishing a multijurisdictional, nonemergency 311 telephone system will find Building a 311 System informative. This Internet-only publication documents the experiences of Orange County, Florida, in organizing and establishing such a system. Topics discussed in this case study include the political, financial, and technological challenges involved in intergovernmental partnerships and interagency coordination, along with developing call routing and tracking mechanisms, staffing a 311 call center, and the role that the Orange County 311 system plays in hurricane emergency preparedness.By Stephen T. HolmesCategories: TechnologyLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0447Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • May 2007Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 02:31 (UTC-5) in 0.19 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Donald Sharpe, President of E-Com Technologies Corporation, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of E-Com Technologies Corporation;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 17, 2004

/s/ Donald SharpeDonald Sharpe, President
(Principal Executive Officer)
§ 221.42 When must a party supplement or amend information it has previously provided? ( a ) *Discovery.* A party must promptly supplement or amend any prior response to a discovery request if it learns that the response: ( 1 ) Was incomplete or incorrect when made; or
( 2 ) Though complete and correct when made, is now incomplete or incorrect in any material respect.
( b ) *Witnesses and exhibits.* ( 1 ) Within 10 days after the date set for completion of discovery, each party must file an updated version of the list of witnesses and exhibits required under §§ 221.21(c), 221.22(c), or 221.25(c).
( 2 ) If a party wishes to include any new witness or exhibit on its updated list, it must provide an explanation of why it was not feasible for the party to include the witness or exhibit on its list under §§ 221.21(c), 221.22(c), or 221.25(c).
( c ) *Failure to disclose.* ( 1 ) A party will not be permitted to introduce as evidence at the hearing testimony from a witness or other information that it failed to disclose under §§ 221.21(c), 221.22(c), or 221.25(c), or paragraphs (a) or (b) of this section.
( 2 ) Paragraph (c)(1) of this section does not apply if the failure to disclose was substantially justified or is harmless.
( 3 ) A party may object to the admission of evidence under paragraph (c)(1) of this section before or during the hearing.
( 4 ) The ALJ will consider the following in determining whether to exclude evidence under paragraphs (c)(1) through (3) of this section: ( i ) The prejudice to the objecting party;
( ii ) The ability of the objecting party to cure any prejudice;
( iii ) The extent to which presentation of the evidence would disrupt the orderly and efficient hearing of the case;
( iv ) The importance of the evidence; and
( v ) The reason for the failure to disclose, including any bad faith or willfulness regarding the failure.
# EUR-Lex - 11957E235 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957E235

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY, PART SIX - GENERAL AND FINAL PROVISIONS, ARTICLE 235 **

*

*

++++

Article 235

If action by the Community should prove necessary to attain , in the course of the operation of the common market , one of the objectives of the Community and this Treaty has not provided the necessary powers , the Council shall , acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the Assembly , take the appropriate measures .
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P308A Prosecutor's Stand: A Guide for Law EnforcementThis guide is designed to help law enforcement representatives facilitate discussions and training sessions in conjunction with screenings of the 24-minute Not In Our Town film A Prosecutor's Stand. Produced in collaboration with the COPS Office, the film examines recent hate crimes in San Francisco, California, and explores the nature of these crimes, trauma faced by victims, and common challenges in investigating and prosecuting these cases. Interviews with prosecutors, the district attorney, victims, victim liaisons, and others demonstrate the important interplay between hate crime victims, law enforcement, and the greater community. The guide provides discussion questions for use in internal agency trainings and community screenings, as well as a hate crimes fact sheet and a list of supplemental resources. Used together, the film and guide can help agencies work to prevent hate crimes, improve hate crime reporting, enhance investigations and prosecutions, and support victims.By Paul Sheridan, Michele Dahee Kloss, Libby McInernyCategories: Community PartnershipsLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p308Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFBook • Sep 2015Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 02:21 (UTC-5) in 0.19 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) 

Grant Payment Request System (GPRS) 

Q: 

A: 

What is the Grant Payment Request System (GPRS)? 

GPRS is a web-based payment request system that allows grantees to perform draw 

down request using the internet. 

Q: 

A: 

What is the website for GPRS? 

https://grants.ojp.usdoj.gov/gprs/login 

Q: 

A: 

Is there a user guide for GPRS? 

Yes. The user guide can be found at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/about/offices/ocfogprs.htm 

Q: 

A: 

How will I register for access to GPRS? 

Financial Points of Contact (FPOCs) can request access through a self registration 

process in GPRS. 

All of the COPS Office grantees with accounts in GPRS have the role of Drawdown 

Specialist. The COPS Office grantee may request to be a GPRS Drawdown Specialist by 

accessing the GPRS website and selecting the option to self-register. After requesting to 

register, the COPS Office Response Center will approve the request. After the request is 

approved, a confirmation email is sent to the FPOC with notification that the FPOC has 

been granted access to GPRS as a Drawdown Specialist. The confirmation email may 

take a couple of days due to the nature of the approval process. Once the 

confirmation email is sent, the Drawdown Specialist will be granted access to GPRS. 

Once access is granted, the FPOC will use the User ID entered during the self-registration 

process and a temporary password (sent in the confirmation email) to log into GPRS. 

Q: 

A: 

If I am a GMS (OJP/OVW) user, can I use my GMS User ID to register for the COPS 

Office grants in GPRS? 

No. You will have two separate accounts in GPRS, a GMS account and the COPS Office 

account. All GMS users will register in GPRS with their GMS User ID. All CMS users will 

register in GPRS using a unique User ID that cannot be the same as a GMS User ID. 

Please note that the User ID entered during registration must be unique and not the 

same as a GMS User ID. 

Q: 

A: 

If I already have a GPRS username, and have received a new award, how do I gain 

access to my new award in GPRS? 

Those Drawdown Specialists that have already been approved will need to request the 

new award addition. Please email the GPRS Registrar 

(COPSGPRSRegistration@usdoj.gov) with your username, first & last name, vendor 

number and the new award number. Please note that you will not be able to draw down 

from the new award until the signed award document has been received by the COPS 

Office. 

Q: 

A: 

What do I do if the Points of Contact for my grant have changed? 

If you need to change your POC for your grant, please contact the Response Center at 

800-421-6770 or provide the Response Center with the Change of Information Form, 

which can be found on the COPS Office website under Grants & Funding. 

August 2011
<PAGE>



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John "JT"  Thatch,  as Chief  Executive  Officer and acting  Chief  Financial
Officer of Dtomi, Inc. (the "Company")  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to my
knowledge:

(1) the  accompanying  Form 10-Q report for the period  ending March 31, 2003 as
filed with the U.S.  Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report")  fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 19, 2003             /s/ John "JT" Thatch
                                    ---------------------------------
                                    John "JT" Thatch, CEO/acting CFO
<PAGE>
PUBLIC LAW 112–193—OCT. 5, 2012 126 STAT. 1443 

Public Law 112–193 

112th Congress 

An Act 

To make corrections with respect to Food and Drug Administration user fees. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘FDA User Fee Corrections Act 

of 2012’’. 

SEC. 2. CORRECTIONS TO FDA USER FEES. 

(a) Section 502(aa) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 

Act (21 U.S.C. 352(aa)) is amended by striking ‘‘744A(a)(4)’’ and 

inserting ‘‘744B(a)(4)’’. 

(b) Subchapter C of title VII of the Federal Food, Drug, and 

Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 379f et seq.) is amended— 

(1) in section 738(i)(2)(A)(ii), by striking ‘‘shall only be 

available’’ and inserting ‘‘shall be available’’; 

(2) in sections 744B(a)(2)(E)(ii)(II), 744B(a)(3)(C)(ii)(III), 

744B(a)(4)(D)(i)(II), and 744B(a)(4)(D)(ii)(II), by inserting ‘‘for 

such year’’ after ‘‘obligation of fees’’ each place it appears; 

and 

(3) in section 744B(i)(2)(C)— 

(A) by inserting a comma after ‘‘September 30, 2013’’; 

and 

(B) by striking the comma after ‘‘for fiscal year 2013’’. 

(c)(1) Notwithstanding section 744B(a)(2)(E)(ii) of the Federal 

Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 379j–42(a)(2)(E)(ii)), the 

fee authorized under section 744B(a)(2) of such Act for fiscal year 

2013 shall be due 30 calendar days after publication of the notice 

provided for in section 744B(a)(2)(C)(i) of such Act. 

(2) Notwithstanding section 744B(a)(3)(C)(ii) of such Act, the 

fee authorized under section 744B(a)(3) of such Act for fiscal year 

2013 shall be due on the later of— 

(A) the date of submission of the abbreviated new drug 

application or prior approval supplement for which such fee 

applies; or 

(B) 30 calendar days after publication of the notice referred 

to in section 744B(a)(3)(B)(i) of such Act. 

(3) Notwithstanding section 744B(a)(4)(D)(i) of such Act, the 

fee authorized under section 744B(a)(4) of such Act for fiscal year 

Deadline. 

21 USC 379j–42 

note. 

21 USC 379j–42. 

21 USC 379j. 

FDA User Fee 

Corrections Act 

of 2012. 

21 USC 301 note. 

Oct. 5, 2012 

[H.R. 6433] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
126 STAT. 1444 PUBLIC LAW 112–193—OCT. 5, 2012 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 6433: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 158 (2012): 

Sept. 19, considered and passed House. 

Sept. 21, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

2013 shall be due not later than 45 days after the publication 

of the notice under section 744B(a)(4)(C)(i) of such Act. 

Approved October 5, 2012. 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P164Standards and Guidelines for Internal Affairs: Recommendations from a Community of PracticeThrough a grant from the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) convened the National Internal Affairs Community of Practice group comprising the LAPD and 11 major city and county law enforcement agencies. The purpose was to share and develop standards, recommendations, and best practices in Internal Affairs work, discuss differences and similarities in practice, and look at various approaches to improving individual and collective agenciesCategories: Ethics and IntegrityLanguage: EnglishLow stockPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p164Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFBook • Aug 2009Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 04:32 (UTC-5) in 0.88 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive