alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Biomasse International Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Yves C. Renaud, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Yves C. Renaud

________________________________________________

Yves C. Renaud, Chief Financial Officer





Date: June 10, 2003
2016 COPS Anti-Methamphetamine Program Awards

State and Agency Name Estimated Award Amount

California

California Department of Justice $1,447,880 

Indiana

Indiana State Police $600,000 

Iowa 

Iowa Division of Narcotics Enforcement $282,561 

Michigan

Michigan Department of State Police $920,880 

New York

New York State Police $794,345 

Pennsylvania 

Pennsylvania State Police $186,793 

Tennessee

Tennessee Bureau of Investigation $446,802 

Wisconsin 

Wisconsin Department of Justice $1,500,000 

Total: $6,179,261
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2012-1087 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2009-SW-32-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
Home
About
2020 Federal View Point Survey Results
	About DTIC
	Administrator
	Announcements
	Contact Us
	DTIC’s Past and Future
	DTIC Strategic Plan
	Employment
	Sitemap
Products & Services
DTIC’s Products & Services
	DTIC Registration Benefits
	DTIC Combatant Command (CCMD) Classified Reading Room
	Training
Submit Documents
Sign In
Operating Status
 Defense Technical Information Center
				*Search this site, DoD S&T Reports, and more..*

**Internet Explorer Users:** It is recommended that you use the Google Chrome or Microsoft Edge browser for an optimal experience with this application as Microsoft’s support for Internet Explorer is ending.
	DISMISS 03 - Astronomy and Astrophysics
Return to Subject Categories
01
Astronomy
Observations of celestial bodies, their distances and positions. Includes all observation equipment and techniques. For spectroscopic and radio observations and their related data analysis of celestial bodies and interstellar space, See 03/02, Astrophysics. For chemical aspects of celestial bodies, See 03/02, Astrophysics.02
Astrophysics
Physical and chemical aspects of celestial bodies, their origin and evolution. Includes astronomical spectroscopy, radio astronomy, planetary atmospheres and luminosity. For earth atmosphere, See Field 04, Atmospheric Sciences.03
Celestial
The motions of celestial bodies under the Mechanics influence of gravity; Ephemerides; Eclip.
 **DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER**
8725 John J. Kingman Road
Fort Belvoir, Virginia 22060-6218
(800) 225-3842https://Discover.DTIC.mil
			AdministratorContact UsDoD Privacy ProgramEEOEmploymentFOIAInformation Analysis Centers
			Information QualityLegalMission StatementNo FEAR ActOpen GovernmentPlain Language
			Policy MemorandaPrivacy PolicySAPRStrategic PlanSubmit DocumentsUSA.govUSD(R&E)
			LinkedIn

NOTICE:  The appearance of hyperlinks does not constitute endorsement by the DTIC of non-U.S. Government sites or the information, products, or services contained therein.  Although the DTIC may or may not use these sites as additional distribution channels for Department of Defense information, it does not exercise editorial control over all of the information that you may find at these locations.  Such hyperlinks are provided consistent with the stated purpose of this website. The DTIC bears no responsibility for the accuracy, legality or content of the external website or for that of subsequent links. Contact the external website for answers to questions regarding its content. Please let us know about existing external links which you believe are inappropriate.
**Exhibit
      32**





**CERTIFICATION**





By
      signing below, each of the undersigned officers hereby certifies pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. § 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
      his
      or her knowledge, (i)


this
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and
      (ii) the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial


condition
      and results of operations of Home Federal Bancorp.





Signed
      this 15 th
      day of
      March 2006 .





/s/
                  Mark T. Gorski
              /s/
                  John K. Keach, Jr.(Signature
                  of Authorized Officer)
              (Signature
                  of Authorized Officer)Mark
                  T. Gorski
              John
                  K. Keach, Jr.(Typed
                  Name)
              (Typed
                  Name)Chief
                  Financial Officer
              President
                  and Chief Executive Officer(Title)
              (Title)






A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      and is being retained by Home Federal Bancorp and will be forwarded to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
Dover Municipal Court,

No. 4640.

#### State *v.*Chalmers H. Day.

Argued April 1, 1958.

Decided April 24, 1958.

*Louis C. Wyman,*Attorney General, *John J. Zimmerman,*Assistant Attorney General, and *T. Casey Moher,*city solicitor *{Mr. Zimmerman*orally), for the State,

*290
      *Philip C. Keefe*(by brief and orally), for the respondent.

Duncan, J.

The resolution of the city council which purported to amend the ordinances of the city and to restrict portions of Main Street to one-way travel was not in the form prescribed by the city charter (Laws 1949, c. 430, s. 2, Pt. I, *subs.*13, as amended by Laws 1953, c. 358, s. 5); nor was it shown to have been published as required by the compiled ordinances of the city. Compiled Ordinances of Dover (1939) c. I, s. 3. As the respondent’s argument is understood, it is his contention that a public highway is one which is open to the public at large for travel, without restriction except by validly adopted police regulation (25 Am. Jur., Highways, *p.*339, s. 2); that the purported regulation relating to Main Street was not legally adopted; and that Main Street, by virtue of the invalid regulation and consequent abandonment of full use of the highway, ceased to be a public highway, and will not again become one until it has been used as such for a period of twenty years. RSA 230:1. From this conclusion it is argued that the State failed to establish that the alleged offense occurred upon a public highway.

The action taken by the city council is in issue only as it bears upon the status of Main Street as a public highway. If it be assumed, arguendo, that the resolution adopted by the council was invalid for want of compliance with requirements of the charter (but see, *Town of Walkerton*v. *N.Y.C. & St. L. R.R. Co.,*215 Ind. 206, 211, 212), we are of the opinion that the result for which the respondent contends does not follow. An invalid restriction would have no legal effect. It is not contended that Main Street was not a public highway prior to adoption of the resolution by the council. It follows that its status as a public highway was unchanged by reason of any invalid restriction.

If travel upon the highway was in fact restricted in mistaken reliance upon invalid action by the council, this would not constitute such an abandonment of rights by the public as to change the status of the highway as a public way. *State*v. *Morse,*50 N. H. 9, 20; *Thompson*v. *Major,*58 N. H. 242, 244. We therefore find it unnecessary to determine the validity of the action taken by the city council.

There was no error in the use of judicial notice in determining that the State had sustained its burden of proving the offense charged, and the respondent’s motion to dismiss was properly *291denied. *State*v. *Duranleau,*99 N. H. 30; *State*v. *Deane,*101 N. H. 127, 131.

*Exception overruled.*

All concurred.
§ 600.509 Prohibited species. ( a ) The owner or operator of each FFV must minimize its catch or receipt of prohibited species.
( b ) After allowing for sampling by an observer (if any), the owner or operator of each FFV must sort its catch of fish received as soon as possible and return all prohibited species and species parts to the sea immediately with a minimum of injury, regardless of condition, unless a different procedure is specified by the regulations for the fishery in which the FFV is engaged. All prohibited species must be recorded in the daily fishing log and other fishing logs as specified by the regulations for the fishery in which the FFV is engaged.
( c ) All species of fish that an FFV has not been specifically allocated or authorized under this subpart to retain, including fish caught or received in excess of any allocation or authorization, are prohibited species.
( d ) It is a rebuttable presumption that any prohibited species or species part found on board an FFV was caught and retained in violation of this section.
| Magnetotelluric Data Release for Locating the Archean/Proterozoic Suture Zone, East-Central Tooele County, Utah |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

*By* Jackie M. Williams *and* Brian D. Rodriguez 
 
**U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 03-495****Version 1.0**
 
Many sediment-hosted gold deposits occur along linear trends in the Great      Basin.       The distribution and genesis of these deposits in the Great Basin is not      fully       understood. In general, most models agree that regional structures played      an       important role in the spatial distribution of these deposits (e.g. Arehart      and       others, 1993; Ilchik and Barton, 1997; Radtke, 1985; Shawe, 1991; Sillitoe      and       Bonham, 1990; Tosdal, 1998). To investigate crustal structures that may      be       related to the genesis of gold deposits in the Great Basin, a regional      south-north profile of magnetotelluric (MT) soundings was acquired in 2003.      Resistivity modeling of the MT data can be used to investigate buried structures      or sutures that may have influenced subsequent tectonism, sedimentation,      and       regional fluid flow. The goal of this survey is to infer the location of      the       Archean/Proterozoic suture zone in east-central Tooele County, Utah. The      purpose of this report is to release the MT sounding data; no interpretation      of     the data is included.
Readme TXT file (2 KB)
 OFR-03-495 PDF file (3.2 MB) Text Only PDF file (350 KB)(This version of the report is accessible as defined in Section 508.)AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices
U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey      URL: https://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/of/2003/ofr-03-495/Questions or Assistance: USGS Web ContactPage Last Modified: Sat Jan 12 23:39 EDT 2013
Exhibit 32.2

           Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted
                 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
                                  Act of 2002


I, Colin Baird, Chief Financial Officer of Australian Forest Industries (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
September 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: November 17, 2006

/s/ Colin Baird
---------------------------
Colin Baird
Chief Financial Officer
```

                                                                   EXHIBIT  32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  ss.1350),
the  undersigned,  Guy J. Quigley,  the Chief  Executive  Officer of The Quigley
Corporation,  a Nevada corporation (the "Company"),  does hereby certify, to his
knowledge, that:

The  Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the year  ended  December  31,  2004 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information  contained in
the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                                                        /s/  Guy J. Quigley
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Guy J. Quigley
                                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                                        March 31, 2005
```
EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT








<PAGE>




                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                          Percent        State of
                                                                            of         Incorporation
                   Parent                           Subsidiary           Ownership    or Organization
                   ------                           ----------           ---------    ---------------
<S>                                 <C>                                    <C>        <C>        
Magna Bancorp, Inc.                 Magnolia Federal Bank for Savings      100%           Federal

                                    Magna Insurance Company                 79%       South Carolina

                                    Magna Financial Services., Inc.        100%         Mississippi

                                    Realty Services, Inc.                  100%         Mississippi

                                    Comserv, Inc.                          100%         Mississippi

Magnolia Federal Bank for Savings   Magna Mortgage Company                 100%         Mississippi
</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 622
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 622 appear at 79 FR 57837, Sept. 26, 2014 and at 81 FR 32253, May 23, 2016.

§ 622.76 Restrictions on sale/purchase. ( a ) *Gulf wild live rock.* Wild live rock in or from the Gulf EEZ may not be sold or purchased. The prohibition on sale or purchase does not apply to wild live rock from the Gulf EEZ that was harvested and landed prior to January 1, 1997.
( b ) [Reserved]
#### The State *ex rel.*Brebaugh, Appellant, v. Bolte.

Guardian and Ward: guardian’s liability discharged by settlement with his successor. Where a female guardian of her minor son, instead of investing her ward’s money in real estate, takes perfectly good notes therefor, and marries one who thereupon becomes curator of the minor, and flies his inventory in which he charges himself with these notes as so much cash, and takes them from the guardian in full discharge of her liability to the ward, and the curator wastes the estate by neglecting to collect the notes at maturity, he and his sureties are liable, and the guardian is discharged.*

*Appeal from St Louis^ Court of Appeals.*

Aeeirmed.

This is an action brought by Christian Koerner, as guardian of Francis L. Brebaugh, a minor, against Bolte and Perschbacher, sureties on the bond of Catherine, the mother and fi'rát guardian of said minor.

*Christian Koerner*for appellant.

*Hitchcock, Lubke*& *Player*for respondents.

*

This syllabus is taken from 4 Mo. App. 599.

*273Sherwood, C. J.

At the conclusion of the trial of this ■cause in the circuit court, before his Honor, Judge Wick-ham, the defendant asked the following declaration of law, which was given: “If from the evidence the court finds that previous to December, 1867, one Herman Eggeman intermarried with Catherine Brebaugh, and that there.after and in the month of December, 1867, the said Eggeman was appointed by the St. Louis probate court as curator of "the estate of Erancis L. Brebaugh, to succeed the said ■Catherine Brebaugh in her guardianship of the estate of :said minor; that thereafter, and previous to March 3rd, 1868, the said Catherine Brebaugh accounted with and ■paid over to said Eggeman the said balance in her hands .as such guardian shown by her last settlement; and' that •on March 3rd, 1868, the said Eggeman filed in the St. Louis probate court an inventory and receipt over his signature and under his corporal oath acknowledging that he had received from her such balance; and if the court .also finds that thereafter said Eggeman, in his annual settlement charged himself with the amount of money thus .acknowledged by him to have been received from said 'Catherine, and allowed interest thereon to the estate of ■said minor at six per cent per annum, then the plaintiff cannot recover in this action.” The evidence fully justified the circuit court in thus declaring the law, and it would ■.seem that there could be but one opinion on the facts proven. The court of appeals, his Honor, Judge Bake-well, delivering the opinion, after a careful examination of the testimony, affirmed the judgment of the court below. The opinion referred to is so satisfactory that we cannot do better than adopt it as our own, this we do, and affirm the judgment.

All concur.
EXHIBIT 32.02





Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of Sage Fund Limited Partnership (“Fund”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“Report”), I, Carl A. Serger, Chief Financial Officer of Steben & Company, Inc., the General Partner of the Fund, certify, pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.








Date:
May 13, 2011





By:
/s/ Carl A. SergerCarl A. SergerChief Financial Officer of the General Partner




E-4
§ 90.383 RSU sites near the U.S./Canada or U.S./Mexico border. Until such time as agreements between the United States and Canada or the United States and Mexico, as applicable, become effective governing border area use of the 5895-5925 MHz band, authorizations to operate Roadside Units (RSUs) are granted subject to the following conditions: ( a ) RSUs must not cause harmful interference to stations in Canada or Mexico that are licensed in accordance with the international table of frequency allocations for Region 2 (see § 2.106 of this chapter) and must accept any interference that may be caused by such stations.
( b ) Authority to operate RSUs is subject to modifications and future agreements between the United States and Canada or the United States and Mexico, as applicable.
[69 FR 46445, Aug. 3, 2004, as amended at 86 FR 23298, May 3, 2021]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.47

                             [NEODATA LETTERHEAD]

June 17, 1996



Francie Anhut



Dear Francie:

To confirm our recent conversations, we have revised our agreement on severance
with you. Our agreement is as follows:

o    In the event your employment is terminated for any of the reasons set
     forth in Neodata's Severance Policy, you will be paid a minimum of six (6)
     months of salary continuation payable bi-weekly and calculated based upon
     your annual base salary in effect at that time less any taxes to be
     withheld as required by law. If you do not find suitable alternative
     employment within that six (6) month period, severance payments will
     continue for an additional period equal to the lesser of six (6) months or
     until suitable alternative employment commences.

Should we eventually sever you, we will provide you with an agreement which
will specify more fully non-compete and confidentiality arrangements.



Sincerely,



/s/  SUSAN L. MORSE
----------------------
Susan  L. Morse
Senior Vice President
Human Resources

cc: Larry Jones
#### § 95.2325 WMTS interference.

Authorized health care providers, in conjunction with the equipment manufacturers, must cooperate in the selection and use of frequencies in order to reduce the potential for interference with other wireless medical telemetry devices, or other co-primary users. However, WMTS operations in the 608-614 MHz band are not entitled to protection from adjacent band interference from broadcast television stations transmitting on TV Channels 36 and 38.