alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

May 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
130364 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STAT E OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 130364 COA: 265874 Oakland CC: 2004-194544-FC; 2004-196653-FC DORIAN LORENZY ROBERTSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 28, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0522 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 30, 2006

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1996 AND THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997,
1996 AND 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM
10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS          
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996  
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996  
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996 
<CASH>                                           8,087     
<SECURITIES>                                    57,242
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,621 
<ALLOWANCES>                                       622  
<INVENTORY>                                          0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                77,516  
<PP&E>                                          15,212  
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,790
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  86,095  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,540 
<BONDS>                                              0  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0  
<PREFERRED>                                          0 
<COMMON>                                       177,469 
<OTHER-SE>                                           0  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    86,095  
<SALES>                                         41,712 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,894
<CGS>                                            2,166 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   43,570  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,948
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,288 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,660 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0  
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,660  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.27 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25  
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jupitermedia Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alan M. Meckler, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|                                                    
|/s/    Alan M. Meckler                              
|                                                    
|Alan M. Meckler Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



August 9, 2005



This certification is made solely for the purpose
of 18 U.S.C. § 1350, subject to the knowledge standard therein, and not for any other purpose.
An official website of the United States government "Here is how you know"


Official websites use.gov  .gov
 Secure .gov websites use HTTPS 
	A lock https:


Menu
        ABOUTDirector's Corner
Contact COPS
Community Policing in Action: Photo Contest
The L. Anthony Sutin Award for Innovative Law Enforcement and Community Partnerships
Photo Galleries
Subscribe
NEWSPress Releases
Executive Order on Advancing Effective, Accountable Policing and Criminal Justice Practices to Enhance Public Trust and Public Safety
GRANTSSolicitation Finder
Funding Opportunities
How To Apply
Grants Deadlines and Announcement Dates
Compliance and Reporting
Program Documents
Grantee Success Stories
Award Announcement Map
RESOURCESCritical Incident Review: Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, TX
National Blue Alert Network
Resource Center/Publications
E-Newsletter: Community Policing Dispatch
Podcast Series: The Beat
Video Series: What’s New in Blue
Tribal Community Policing Resources
Community Policing Topics
Community Violence Intervention
Addressing Human TraffickingLabor Trafficking
Recruitment, Hiring & Retention
Filing a Civil Rights Complaint
TRAINING & TECHNICAL ASSISTANCECollaborative Reform InitiativeCRI-TAC
Critical Response
Organizational Assessments
COPS Training Portal
Training
ACCOUNT ACCESS
 Search form
    Search




Map of CRI-TAC Activity


**Primary Requestor** – an agency that initially contacts CRI-TAC and requests assistance

**Peer Agency Addition** – an agency that did not initially contact CRI-TAC but participated in the technical assistance by invitation of the primary requestor, CRI-TAC staff, or other law enforcement partners such as U.S. Attorney’s Offices


SPOTLIGHT


SUBSCRIBE TO EMAIL UPDATES
 
 SUBSCRIBE TO CP DISPATCH


ABOUT Contact COPS
	Community Policing in Action: Photo Contest
	The L. Anthony Sutin Award for Innovative Law Enforcement and Community Partnerships
	Photo Galleries
	Subscribe NEWS Press Releases
	Executive Order on Safe Policing for Safer Communities
 GRANTS Compliance & Reporting
	Program Documents
	Grantees
	Grantee Success Stories
	Agency Portal Video Tutorials
	Award Announcement Map RESOURCES National Blue Alert Network
	Recent Releases
	Resource Center/Publications
	E-Newsletter: Community Policing Dispatch
	Podcast Series: The Beat
	Video Series: What’s New in Blue
	Tribal Community Policing Resources
	Addressing Human Trafficking
	Community Policing Topics
	Recruitment, Hiring & Retention
 TRAINING & TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Collaborative Reform Initiative for Technical Assistance Center
	COPS Training Portal
	Training ACCOUNT ACCESS ACCESSIBILITY INFORMATION


FOIA Language Access Plan Legal Policies and Disclaimers No Fear Act Open Government Plain Writing Privacy Policy USA.gov Whistleblower Protection Social Media Department of Justice Accessibility
#### PEOPLE’S BANK *v.*ALBERT A. LETENDRE ET AL.

(AC 19816)

Schaller, Hennessy and Shea, Js.

Argued February 24

officially released May 9, 2000

*Robert J. Piscitelli,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

*Denise C. McCarthy,*with whom, on the brief, was *Atherton B. Ryan,*for the appellee (defendant town of Ellington).

*Opinion*

PER CURIAM.

In this mortgage foreclosure action, the plaintiff, People’s Bank, appeals following the trial court’s denial of its motion to reopen the judgment. The plaintiff claims that the trial court abused its discretion when it refused to reopen the judgment so that it could amend its complaint to convert this action into an action on the note. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The record discloses that the plaintiff commenced a foreclosure action against the defendants on March 4, 1998, with respect to property in Ellington. Upon motion of the plaintiff, the trial court rendered a judgment of strict foreclosure on February 1, 1999, with law days commencing on May 10, 1999. After the judgment was *646opened on May 10, 1999, new law days were set to commence on July 12,1999. The plaintiff filed a motion to reopen the judgment on July 1, 1999. The sole basis for the motion was that the plaintiff did not want to take title to the property and wanted to convert the matter to an action on the note. The court denied the motion to reopen the judgment, stating that “to now allow the plaintiff to change remedies when judgment has entered would be unfair and inequitable.”

“[A] foreclosure action constitutes an equitable proceeding. . . . In an equitable proceeding, the trial court may examine all relevant factors to ensure that complete justice is done. . . . The determination of what equity requires in a particular case, the balancing of the equities, is a matter for the discretion of the trial court.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) *Federal National Mortgage Assn.*v. *Dicioccio,*51 Conn. App. 343, 344-45, 721 A.2d 569 (1998). This court must make every reasonable presumption in favor of the trial court’s decision when reviewing a claim of abuse of discretion. *Yanow*v. *Teal Industries, Inc.,*196 Conn. 579, 583, 494 A.2d 573 (1985). Our review of the trial court’s exercise of legal discretion is limited to the question of whether the trial court correctly applied the law and could reasonably have reached the conclusion that it did. *Connecticut National Bank*v. *Zuckerman,*29 Conn. App. 541, 545, 616 A.2d 814 (1992). In this appeal, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion.

The judgment is affirmed and the case is remanded for the purpose of setting new law days.
#### § 16.32 Importation by Federal agencies.

Nothing in this part shall restrict the importation and transportation, without a permit, of any live wildlife by Federal agencies solely for their own use, upon the filing of a written declaration with the District Director of Customs at the port of entry as required under § 14.61: *Provided,* That the provisions of this section shall not apply to bald and golden eagles or their eggs, or to migratory birds or their eggs, the importations of which are governed by regulations under parts 22 and 21 of this chapter, respectively.
# EUR-Lex - 11997E025 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11997E025

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Amsterdam consolidated version) - Part Three: Community policies - Title I: Free movement of goods - Chapter 1: The customs union - Article 25 - Article 12 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - Article 12 - EEC Treaty **

*
Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0188 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0012 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Amsterdam consolidated version)

Article 25

Customs duties on imports and exports and charges having equivalent effect shall be prohibited between Member States. This prohibition shall also apply to customs duties of a fiscal nature.
§ 14.53 Detention and refusal of clearance. ( a ) *Detention.* Any Service officer, or Customs officer acting under § 14.54, may detain imported or exported wildlife and any associated property. As soon as practicable following the importation or exportation and decision to detain, the Service will mail a notice of detention by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, to the importer or consignee, or exporter, if known or easily ascertainable. Such notice must describe the detained wildlife or other property, indicate the reason for the detention, describe the general nature of the tests or inquiries to be conducted, and indicate that if the releasability of the wildlife has not been determined within 30 days after the date of the notice, or a longer period if specifically stated, that the Service will deem the wildlife to be seized and will issue no further notification of seizure.
( b ) *Refusal of clearance.* Any Service officer may refuse clearance of imported or exported wildlife and any Customs officer acting under § 14.54 may refuse clearance of imported wildlife when there are responsible grounds to believe that: ( 1 ) A Federal law or regulation has been violated;
( 2 ) The correct identity and country of origin of the wildlife has not been established (in such cases, the burden is upon the owner, importer, exporter, consignor, or consignee to establish such identity by scientific name to the species level or, if any subspecies is protected by the laws of this country or the country of origin to the subspecies level);
( 3 ) Any permit, license, or other documentation required for clearance of such wildlife is not available, is not currently valid, has been suspended or revoked, or is not authentic;
( 4 ) The importer, exporter, or the importer's or exporter's agent has filed an incorrect or incomplete declaration for importation or exportation as provided in § 14.61 or § 14.63; or
( 5 ) The importer, exporter, or the importer's or exporter's agent has not paid any fee or portion of balance due for inspection fees required by § 14.93 or § 14.94, or penalties assessed against the importer or exporter under 50 CFR part 11. This paragraph does not apply to penalty assessments on appeal in accordance with the provisions of part 11.
[61 FR 31869, June 21, 1996]
#### § 68.608 Publication of technical criteria.

The Administrative Council for Terminal Attachments shall place technical criteria proposed for publication on public notice for 30 days. At the end of the 30 day public notice period, if there are no oppositions, the Administrative Council for Terminal Attachments shall publish the technical criteria.
#### § 35.11 Scientific uses.

Recognizing the scientific value of wilderness, research data gathering and similar scientific uses will be encouraged providing that wilderness values are not impaired. The person or agency involved in scientific investigation must be willing to accept reasonable limitations on activities and location and size of the area to be used for research purposes. A special use permit authorizing scientific uses shall be required.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

I, John Haddock,  as Chief Executive Officer and Principal  Financial Officer of
Dtomi,  Inc. (the  "Company")  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the  accompanying  Form 10-QSB report for the period ending June 30, 2004 as
filed with the U.S.  Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report")  fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  September 1, 2004                        /s/ John Haddock
                                                 ----------------------------
                                                 John Haddock
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jupitermedia Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alan M. Meckler, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ Alan M. Meckler                 
|Alan M. Meckler                     
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|November 9, 2006
# EUR-Lex - 12002E042 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E042

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Three: Community policies - Title III: Free movement of persons, services and capital - Chapter 1: Workers - Article 42 - Article 51 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - Article 51 - EEC Treaty **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0052 - 0052 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0194 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0021 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Three: Community policies

Title III: Free movement of persons, services and capital

Chapter 1: Workers

Article 42

Article 51 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 51 - EEC Treaty

Article 42

The Council shall, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251, adopt such measures in the field of social security as are necessary to provide freedom of movement for workers; to this end, it shall make arrangements to secure for migrant workers and their dependants:

(a) aggregation, for the purpose of acquiring and retaining the right to benefit and of calculating the amount of benefit, of all periods taken into account under the laws of the several countries;

(b) payment of benefits to persons resident in the territories of Member States.

The Council shall act unanimously throughout the procedure referred to in Article 251.
Exhibit 23

G. BRAD BECKSTEAD
---------------------------
Certified Public Accountant

                                                  330 E. Warm Springs
                                                 Las Vegas, NV  89119
                                                         702.528.1984
                                                  425.928.2877 (efax)

July 30, 2001


To Whom It May Concern:

The firm of G. Brad Beckstead, CPA, consents to the inclusion of my report
of July 30, 2001, on the Financial Statements of Emporia Systems for the
six months ending June 30, 2001, in any filings which are necessary now or
in the near future to be filed with the US Securities and Exchange
Commission.

Signed,


/s/ G. Brad Beckstead
---------------------------
    G. Brad Beckstead, CPA


<PAGE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Earned Income Tax Credit Issue Committee will be conducted (via teleconference). The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, October 10, 2006. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Audrey Y. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 (toll-free), or 718-488-2085 (non toll-free). 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Earned Income Tax Credit Issue Committee will be held Tuesday, October 10, 2006 from 12 p.m. to 1 p.m. ET via a telephone conference call. The public is invited to make oral comments. Individual comments will be limited to 5 minutes. For information or to confirm attendance, notification of intent to attend the meeting must be made with Audrey Y. Jenkins. Ms. Jenkins may be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or (718) 488-2085, send written comments to Audrey Y. Jenkins, TAP                           ( print page 55278)                        Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201 or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org*. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate in the telephone conference call meeting must be made in advance.                 

The agenda will include various IRS issues. 

Dated: September 12, 2006. 

John Fay, 

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel. 

[FR Doc. 06-7854 Filed 9-20-06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
# EUR-Lex - 11965F/PRO/PRI/19 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11965F/PRO/PRI/19

**TREATY ESTABLISHING A SINGLE COUNCIL AND A SINGLE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, PROTOCOL ON THE PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, CHAPTER VII: GENERAL PROVISIONS, ARTICLE 19 **

*
Official Journal 152 , 13/07/1967 P. 0016 *

++++

ARTICLE 19

THE INSTITUTIONS OF THE COMMUNITIES SHALL , FOR THE PURPOSE OF APPLYING THIS PROTOCOL , COOPERATE WITH THE RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITIES OF THE MEMBER STATES CONCERNED .