alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ORRi N G . HATC H UTA H JAC EJOHNSO N CHIE FO FSTAF F 10 4 Ha n Senat e ORice Buifdin o nuFHONi : (202 1 224-525 1 TO O 1202 ) 224-2S4 9 FAX : (202 ) 224-633 1 Websiie : hnp://www.senate.g(rv/-h8tc h 

# PitttB ^ ^tat^ s Senat e WASHINGTON , DC 20510-440 2 Septembers , 201 0 Th e Honorabl e Ra y LaHoo d Secretary o f

Transportatio n Washington , D.C . 2059 0 Dea rMr . Secretary : I woul dlik e t o brin g t o you r attentio n th e importanc e o f regularl y schedule dcommercia l passenge r ai r servic e at

Prov o Municipa l Airpor t locate din Prov o City , Utah . Prov o Cit y ha s submitted agran t applicatio n unde r

th e Smal l Communit y Ai r Servic e Developmen t

Program , seekin g $800,00 0 t o fundtw o phase s tha t will resul t

in ai r servic e at

Prov o Municipa l Airport . Prov o Cit y ha s indicate daloca l matc hwil l b e provide dfo r thi s grant . Prov o Cit y recentl y complete dastud y tha t show s th e nee dfo r

ai r servic e t o Denver , Lo s Angeles , Sa

n Francisco , an dLa s Vegas , indicatin g that Prov o Municipa l Airpor t coul deventuall y provid e servic e t o approximatel y 500,00 0 passenger s pe r annum . Th e existin g ai r

servic e shortfall s in th e regio n hav e bee n identified , an dstrategi c plannin g effort s betwee n loca l communitie s an dexistin g businesse s hav e specifie dth e solution s t o thes e shortfalls . Potentia l ai r

servic e provider s an dloca l communitie s alik e hav e indicate dsuppor t for thi s venture . Specifically , I amawar e amajo r commercia l airlin e ha s committe dt o openin g flight s i f thi s gran t i s awarded . I believ e Prov o City' s applicatio n demonstrate s th e substantia l benefit s communitie s in th e Utah Count y are aan dth e surroundin g countie s ma y deriv e fro mparticipatio n in thi s program . Therefore , i respectfull y reques t

th e Departmen t

o f Transportatio n t o giv e full consideratio n t o thei r gran t application . Prov o Cit y Mayo r

Joh n Curti s woul db e happ y t o provid e furthe r detai l an danswe r

an y question s yo u may have . Mayo r

Curti s ca n b e reache dat (801 ) 852-6100 . r o CZ 2 c = C D

— 1 r o > C D

_ o 

# ^^^ M ^

FINANC E JUDICIARY HEALTH . EDUCATION . LABOR , AN D PENSION S INTELLIGENC E

. . AGIN G

--* ^

3 • • SJOINT-GOMMITTE E 'rjMi-TAXATIO N r-n--M m —1- > J-^r C O

Than k yo u for you r consideratio n in thi s matter . p\y ,

Orri n G . Hatc h Unite dState s Senato r OGH:kt t

PfllNTE O O N RECYCLE D P»\PE R
# EUR-Lex - 11992E040 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11992E040

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY - PART THREE: COMMUNITY POLICIES - TITLE II: AGRICULTURE - ARTICLE 40 /* CODIFIED VERSION OF THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY */ **

*
Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0018 *

Article 40

1. Member States shall develop the common agricultural policy by degrees during the transitional period and shall bring it into force by the end of that period at the latest.

2. In order to attain the objectives set out in Article 39a common organization of agricultural markets shall be established.

This organization shall take one of the following forms, depending on the product concerned:

(a) common rules on competition;

(b) compulsory coordination of the various national market organizations;

(c) a European market organization.

3. The common organization established in accordance with paragraph 2 may include all measures required to attain the objectives set out in Article 39, in particular regulation of prices, aids for the production and marketing of the various products, storage and carryover arrangements and common machinery for stabilizing imports or exports.

The common organization shall be limited to pursuit of the objectives set out in Article 39 and shall exclude any discrimination between producers or consumers withing the Community.

Any common price policy shall be based on common criteria and uniform methods of calculation.

4. In order to enable the common organization referred to in paragraph 2 to attain its objectives, one or more agricultural guidance and guarantee funds may be set up.
Editorial Note on Part 300
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 300 appear at 64 FR 44431, Aug. 16, 1999, and at 76 FR 59305, Sept. 26, 2011.

§ 300.42 Findings leading to removal from fishing area. ( a ) Following an investigation conducted under section 10(b) of the Act, the Secretary, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, and upon the request of the Pacific Island Party concerned, may order a fishing vessel that has not submitted to the jurisdiction of that Pacific Island Party to leave immediately the Licensing Area, all Limited Areas, and all Closed Areas upon making a finding that: ( 1 ) The fishing vessel— ( i ) While fishing in the Licensing Area did not have a license issued under § 300.32 to fish in the Licensing Area, and that under the terms of the Treaty the fishing is not authorized to be conducted in the Licensing Area without such a license.
( ii ) Was involved in any incident in which an authorized officer, authorized party officer, or observer was allegedly assaulted with resultant bodily harm, physically threatened, forcibly resisted, refused boarding or subjected to physical intimidation or physical interference in the performance of duties as authorized by the Act or the Treaty;
( iii ) Has not made full payment within 60 days of any amount due as a result of a final judgement or other final determination deriving from a violation in waters within the Treaty Area of a Pacific Island Party; or
( iv ) Was not represented by an agent for service of process in accordance with the Treaty; or
( 2 ) There is probable cause to believe that the fishing vessel— ( i ) Was used in violation of section 5(a)(4), (a)(5), (b)(2), or (b)(3) of the Act;
( ii ) Used an aircraft in violation of section 5(b)(7) of the Act; or
( iii ) Was involved in an incident in which section 5(a)(7) of the Act was violated.
( b ) Upon being advised by the Secretary of State that proper notification to Parties has been made by a Pacific Island Party that such Pacific Island Party is investigating an alleged infringement of the Treaty by a vessel in waters under the jurisdiction of that Pacific Island Party, the Secretary shall order the vessel to leave those waters until the Secretary of State notifies the Secretary that the order is no longer necessary.
( c ) The Secretary shall rescind any order issued on the basis of a finding under paragraphs (a)(1) (iii) or (iv) of this section (subsections 11(a)(1) (C) or (D) of the Act) as soon as the Secretary determines that the facts underlying the finding do not apply.
( d ) An order issued in accordance with this section is not subject to judicial review.
[61 FR 35550, July 5, 1996, as amended at 72 FR 6154, Feb. 9, 2007]
#### § 253.54 Administrative requirements.

Federal assistance awards made as a result of this Act are subject to all Federal laws, Executive Orders, Office of Management and Budget Circulars as incorporated by the award; Department of Commerce and NOAA regulations; policies and procedures applicable to Federal financial assistance awards; and terms and conditions of the awards.
#### LOUIS G. BATTAGLIA *v.*JANET A. BATTAGLIA

(AC 19887)

Landau, Schaller and Hennessy, Js.

Submitted on briefs March 22

officially released April 25, 2000

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### Maynard N. Clement, as State Commissioner of Excise, Plaintiff, *v.*Four Barrels of Beer, and other liquors; Arnold Hunzicker, Answering Defendant.

(Supreme Court, Oneida Trial Term,

January, 1910.)

Constitutional law — Deprivation of life, liberty or property without due process of law — Authorizing confiscation and destruction of property.

The seizure and confiscation of liquors, pursuant to section 33 of the Liquor Tax Law, constitute a taking by due process of law; and the provisions of said section are a legitimate exercise by the Legislature of the police power inherent in a sovereign State.

Proceeding brought under section 33 of the Liquor Tax Law.

Robert J. Fish, for plaintiff.

A. 0. Woodruff, for defendant.

Rogers, J.

After a careful study of the elaborate and learned briefs of the respective counsel, and the authorities therein cited and bearing in mind the rules,

. (a) That every presumption is to be indulged in favor of a statute, and

(b) That a trial court should hesitate to pronounce a statute unconstitutional, 1 have, for the purpose of this trial, concluded:

*2(1) That section 33 of the Liquor Tax Law (Laws 1909, chap. 39) makes provision for due trial’of the right to seize liquors, and that seizure and confiscation,'as and pursuant to the provisions therein prescribed, are takings by “ due process of law.”

(2) That said statute is a legitimate exercise by the Legislature of the police power inherent in a- sovereign State.

(3) That the statute is not in contravention of the provisions of the Constitution, and

(4) That the plaintiff is entitled to judgment according to the prayer of the complaint.

Judgment for plaintiff.
Editorial Note on Part 300
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 300 appear at 64 FR 44431, Aug. 16, 1999, and at 76 FR 59305, Sept. 26, 2011.

§ 300.143 Facilitation of enforcement. ( a ) *General.* Persons aboard fishing vessels subject to this subpart must immediately comply with instructions and/or signals issued by an authorized officer of the United States or Canada, or by an enforcement vessel or aircraft, to stop the vessel, and with instructions to facilitate safe boarding and inspection for the purpose of enforcing any applicable Canadian fisheries law, the Agreement, or this subpart. All of the provisions of § 300.5 regarding communications, boarding, and signals apply to this subpart. For purposes of this subpart, authorized officer in § 305 means an authorized officer of the United States or Canada. (See paragraph (b) of this section for specific requirements for complying with signals and instructions issued by an authorized officer of Canada.)
( b ) *Canadian signals.* In addition to signals set forth in § 300.5, persons aboard fishing vessels subject to this subpart must immediately comply with the following signals by an authorized officer of Canada. ( 1 ) Authorized officers of Canada use the following signals to require fishing vessels to stop or heave to: ( i ) The hoisting of a rectangular flag, known as the International Code Flag “L”, which is divided vertically and horizontally into quarters and colored so that: ( A ) The upper quarter next to the staff and the lower quarter next to the fly are yellow; and
( B ) The lower quarter next to the staff and the upper quarter next to the fly are black;
( ii ) The flashing of a light to indicate the International Morse Code letter “L”, consisting of one short flash, followed by one long flash, followed by two short flashes (. — . .); or
( iii ) The sounding of a horn or whistle to indicate the International Morse Code letter “L”, consisting of one short blast, followed by one long blast, followed by two short blasts (. — . .).
( 2 ) Authorized officers of Canada use the following signals to require a fishing vessel to prepare to be boarded: ( i ) The hoisting of flags representing the International Code Flag “SQ3”; or
( ii ) The flashing of a light, or the sounding of a horn or whistle, to indicate the International Morse Code Signal “SQ3” (. . . — — . — . . . — —).
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 16-1888

___________________________

Joseph Anthony Favors

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Michelle Hoover; Emily Johnson Piper; Daniel Storkamp; Dennis Benson; Jeanine

Herbert; Lori Swanson; Ralph Schmidt; Mandy Torgerson; Rob Rose; Dianna

Magaard; Deb James; Juli Rose; Beth Virden; Joann Fabian; Jeffrey L. Peterson;

Deborah J. Schadegg; Christopher Boreland; Mark Mehl; John King; Ann Linkert

(Zimmerman); Jean Seykora; Thomas Lundquist; Chad Mesojedec; Todd White;

(O.D.) Guillickson; Terry Kniesel; Jamie Kozisch; Tracy Gebhart; Craig Berg;

Steve Youngst; Jon Hibber; Kevin Schlerer; Jena Jones; Rick O’Conner; Eyvette

Anderson; Office of Health Facility Complaints; DHS Office of Maltreatment

Complaints; Office of Licensing for the Security Hospital; The State of

Minnesota; Rebecca Ranem

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis

____________

 Submitted: November 4, 2016

Filed: November 8, 2016

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, ARNOLD, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. 

____________
PER CURIAM.

Joseph Anthony Favors appeals, following the entry of final judgment, a

district court order granting certain defendants’ motions to dismiss his 42 U.S.C.

1

§ 1983 action. Upon de novo review, see Topchian v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.,

760 F.3d 843, 848-49 (8th Cir. 2014), we find no error in the district court’s analysis

of Mr. Favors’s claims. We grant the motion to supplement the record filed by

Appellees Christopher Boreland and Mark Mehl, and we affirm the judgment of the

district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

The Honorable JohnR. Tunheim, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

1

the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations ofthe Honorable

Leo I. Brisbois, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

-2-
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant



PLASMA & MATERIALS TECHNOLOGIES (KOREA) CO., LTD., a Korean corporation

PLASMA & MATERIALS TECHNOLOGIES, JAPAN KK, a Japanese corporation

ELECTROTECH LIMITED, an English corporation

ELECTROTECH EQUIPMENTS LIMITED, an English corporation

ELECTROTECH (ASIA) LIMITED, an English corporation

ELECTROTECH INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, an English corporation

E.T. FABRICATIONS LIMITED, an English corporation

E.T. ELECTROTECH RESEARCH LIMITED, an English corporation

E.T. EQUIPMENTS LIMITED, an English corporation

VACUUM CONTROL SYSTEMS LTD, an English corporation

ELECTROTECH EQUIPMENTS, GmbH, a German limited liability company

ELECTROTECH EQUIPMENTS, SARL, a French limited liability company
#### § 217.311 Effective dates.

Regulations in this subpart are effective from June 21, 2024, through June 20, 2029.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          14,168
<SECURITIES>                                    18,068
<RECEIVABLES>                                  150,567
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,843
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 206,594
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         56,079
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        666
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,918
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   206,594
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,966
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,321
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,799
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,778
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,068
<INCOME-TAX>                                       544
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,524
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,524
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   202.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   202.55
        

</TABLE>
# EUR-Lex - 12002E225A - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E225A

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Five: Institutions of the Community - Title I: Provisions governing the institutions - Chapter 1: The institutions - Section 4: The Court of Justice - Article 225 a - **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0124 - 0125 *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Five: Institutions of the Community

Title I: Provisions governing the institutions

Chapter 1: The institutions

Section 4: The Court of Justice

Article 225 a

Article 225a

The Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament and the Court of Justice or at the request of the Court of Justice and after consulting the European Parliament and the Commission, may create judicial panels to hear and determine at first instance certain classes of action or proceeding brought in specific areas.

The decision establishing a judicial panel shall lay down the rules on the organisation of the panel and the extent of the jurisdiction conferred upon it.

Decisions given by judicial panels may be subject to a right of appeal on points of law only or, when provided for in the decision establishing the panel, a right of appeal also on matters of fact, before the Court of First Instance.

The members of the judicial panels shall be chosen from persons whose independence is beyond doubt and who possess the ability required for appointment to judicial office. They shall be appointed by the Council, acting unanimously.

The judicial panels shall establish their Rules of Procedure in agreement with the Court of Justice. Those Rules shall require the approval of the Council, acting by a qualified majority.

Unless the decision establishing the judicial panel provides otherwise, the provisions of this Treaty relating to the Court of Justice and the provisions of the Statute of the Court of Justice shall apply to the judicial panels.
eqr-ex101_104.htm



 

Exhibit 10.1

 

AMENDMENT TO THE
EQUITY RESIDENTIAL
SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN

Premises

a.Equity Residential (the “Company”) maintains the Equity Residential Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “Plan”).

b.Section 10 of the Plan provides that the Company may amend the Plan at any time.

 

c.The Company wishes to amend the Plan to eliminate certain entry dates.  

 

Amendments

NOW, THEREFORE, the Company hereby amends Section 2.11 of the Plan to read as follows effective June 1, 2020:

Entry Date  means (i) the January 1 and April 1 (or such other date as is determined by the Plan Administrator with respect to a Participant) after an individual first becomes an Eligible Employee or an Eligible Trustee (the "Initial Entry Date"); or (ii) the beginning of any Plan Year after the Participant's Initial Entry Date.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Initial Entry Date of an employee who becomes an Eligible Employee based on such employee’s status as a highly compensated employee with respect to the Equity Residential Advantage Retirement Savings Plan shall be April 1 of the Plan Year during which the employee is first considered a highly compensated employee.

 

Dated this  18th  day of  May , 2020.

 

/s/ Catherine M. Carroway

Catherine Carroway

Senior Vice President, Human Resources

 

 

 

 



QB\62860023.1
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P369Below Ten: Combating Drugs, Guns, and Human Trafficking at the U.S. Southwest BorderThe Below Ten project focused on three cities located on or below Interstate 10 - (1) Nogales, Arizona; (2) Pharr, Texas; and (3) San Diego, California - and their efforts to respond to a wide range of problems related to guns, drugs, and human trafficking. A key component of the project was the series of summits held to develop stakeholder-led plans to respond to the wide range of humanitarian, commercial, and enforcement issues. This publication describes the outcomes of these summits, which brought community members together with local, state, federal, and tribal law enforcement; public health providers; social services; and other groups to identify problems, challenges, and solutions. It also provides detailed information on the approach adopted by each community and the activities that have been sustained since the project ended.By Strategic Applications International (SAI)Categories: Community Partnerships • Data and AnalysisLanguage: EnglishLow stockPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p369Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFBook • Sep 2018Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 05:12 (UTC-5) in 0.89 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive