alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5152

To require States to report certain information to the Federal Bureau of

Investigation for certain crimes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 30, 1994

Mr. REED introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

To require States to report certain information to the

Federal Bureau of Investigation for certain crimes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPORT INFORMATION.

4 (a) RECORDS.—

5 (1) SUBMISSION OF RECORDS.—A State that

6 receives funds under title I of the Omnibus Crime

7 Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 shall submit

8 to the Federal Bureau of Investigation juvenile de9 linquency proceeding, photographic, and fingerprint

10 records of a juvenile found guilty of committing an
2

•HR 5152 IH

1 act which if committed by an adult would be an of2 fense of murder, attempted murder, or rape.

3 (2) USE OF RECORDS.—The records referred to

4 in paragraph (1) may be used by a State only for

5 criminal justice purposes for use in the manner ap6 plicable to adult defendants, including the following:

7 (A) Notification of a licensed firearm deal8 er whether the individual is or is not prohibited

9 from receiving a firearm under State or Federal

10 law.

11 (B) A criminal history background check

12 under the National Child Protection Act of

13 1993.

14 (b) REGULATIONS.—The Attorney General may by

15 regulation prescribe other measures as may be required

16 to carry out the purposes of this Act, including measures

17 relating to the security, confidentiality, accuracy, use, mis18 use, and dissemination of information, and audits and

19 record keeping.

20 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—

21 (1) COMPLIANCE.—A State shall comply with

22 the requirements of subsection (a) not later than the

23 first fiscal year that begins after the end of the first

24 regular session of the State legislature which begins

25 after the date of the enactment of this Act.
3

•HR 5152 IH

1 (2) DATA COLLECTION.—The submission of in2 formation required under subsection (a) shall apply

3 to any individual released from a juvenile facility or

4 from the jurisdiction of a juvenile court on or after

5 June 1, 1994 (including an individual who is an

6 adult upon release).

Æ
# EUR-Lex - 12004V/AFI/DCL/15 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V/AFI/DCL/15

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - FINAL ACT - A.Declarations concerning provisions of the Constitution - 15.Declaration on Articles III-160 and III-322 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0460 - 0460 *

15. Declaration on Articles III-160 and III-322

The Conference recalls that the respect for fundamental rights and freedoms implies, in particular, that proper attention is given to the protection and observance of the due process rights of the individuals or entities concerned. For this purpose and in order to guarantee a thorough judicial review of European decisions subjecting an individual or entity to restrictive measures, such decisions must be based on clear and distinct criteria. These criteria should be tailored to the specifics of each restrictive measure.

--------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.3

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Luigino's, Inc.
(the "Company") for the period ended April 20, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on June 2, 2003 (the "Periodic Report"), I,
Thomas W. Knuesel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of sections
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
          or 78o(d)); and

     2.   The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.



By: /s/ Thomas W. Knuesel
    ---------------------


Thomas W. Knuesel
Chief Financial Officer
Luigino's, Inc.
June 2, 2003
# EUR-Lex - 11965F015 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11965F015

**TREATY ESTABLISHING A SINGLE COUNCIL AND A SINGLE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, CHAPTER II: THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, ARTICLE 15 **

*
Official Journal L 152 , 13/07/1967 P. 0006 *

++++

ARTICLE 15

THE COUNCIL AND THE COMMISSION SHALL CONSULT EACH OTHER AND SHALL SETTLE BY COMMON ACCORD THEIR METHODS OF COOPERATION .
#### § 218.32 Permissible methods of taking.

Under LOAs issued pursuant to §§ 216.106 of this chapter and 218.36, the Holder of the LOA (hereinafter “Navy”) may incidentally, but not intentionally, take marine mammals within the area described in § 218.30(b) by Level B harassment associated with construction activities, provided the activity is in compliance with all terms, conditions, and requirements of the regulations in this subpart and the appropriate LOA.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Maritime Commission
 Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation Intermediary licenses have been reissued by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984, (46 U.S.C. app. 1718) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515. License No.
Name/address
Date reissued017198F
OMJ International Freight Inc., 8423 NW., 68th Street, Miami, FL 33166
June 23, 2006.016012F
Samari Global Trade, Inc., 1310 Beach Avenue, Bronx, NY 10472
June 4, 2006.
 Peter J. King, Deputy Director,  Bureau of Certification, and Licensing.


[FR Doc. 06-7806 Filed 9-19-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
Exhibit 32.2

SATELLITE SECURITY CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Satellite
Security Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Zirk Engelbrecht, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |     |  |                        
|------------------ |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 21, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Zirk Engelbrecht   
|                   |  |     |  | Zirk Engelbrecht       
|                   |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.1

        

        

          CERTAIN IDENTIFIED INFORMATION HAS BEEN EXCLUDED FROM THE EXHIBIT BECAUSE IT IS BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED.  SUCH EXCLUDED INFORMATION HAS BEEN MARKED WITH “[***]”.

         

          

        June 11, 2020

        

        

        Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2855 Gazelle Court

        Carlsbad, CA 92010 Attention: Brett Monia

         

        Re: [***]

        

        

        Dear Dr. Monia:

         

        Reference is hereby made to that certain Second Amended and Restated Strategic Neurology Drug Discovery and Development Collaboration, Option and License Agreement by and between Ionis
          Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Ionis”) and Biogen MA Inc. (“Biogen”) dated October 17, 2018 (the “Neurology II Agreement”), as supplemented and/or amended to date. Biogen and Ionis each may be referred to herein as a “Party” or collectively as the
          “Parties”. Any capitalized terms not defined herein will have the meaning set forth in the Neurology II Agreement, as applicable.

        

        

        The Parties acknowledge and agree that, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Neurology II Agreement:

         

        	

              	(i)	
                Milestones for [***]. For purposes of the [***] Collaboration Program only, the ALS Pre-Licensing Milestone Event set forth in the
                    last row of Table 2 of Section 6.5 of the Neurology II Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

              


          

        

        [***]

         

        	

              	(ii)	
                Except as expressly amended herein, all other provisions of the Neurology II Agreement will remain in full force and effect.

              


         

        If you accept the terms and conditions set forth in this letter agreement, please so indicate by executing a copy of this letter agreement and returning
          it to Biogen. This letter agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original, notwithstanding variations in format or file designation which may result from electronic transmission, store and printing of copies of
          this letter agreement from separate computers or printers. Facsimile signatures and signatures transmitted via electronic mail in PDF format will be treated as original signatures.

        

        

        

        

         

        [The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.]

         

        

        
          
            


        

        Sincerely,

         

          /s/Dale Morris

        Dale Morris, Head Preclinical Safety

        11-Jun-2020

        

        

        

        

        AGREED AND CONFIRMED ON BEHALF OF IONIS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.:

         

        By: /s/Brett Monia

         

        Name: Brett Monia

         

        Title: CEO

         

        Date: June 17, 2020
§ 221.58 When will the hearing record close? ( a ) The hearing record will close when the ALJ closes the hearing, unless he or she directs otherwise.
( b ) Evidence may not be added after the hearing record is closed, but the transcript may be corrected under § 221.56(b).
# EUR-Lex - 11979HN01/13 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11979HN01/13

**DOCUMENTS CONCERNING THE ACCESSION OF THE HELLENIC REPUBLIC TO THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, ACT CONCERNING THE CONDITIONS OF ACCESSION OF THE HELLENIC REPUBLIC AND THE ADJUSTMENTS TO THE TREATIES, ANNEX I LIST REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 21 OF THE ACT OF ACCESSION, XIII. ENVIRONMENT AND CONSUMER PROTECTION **

*
Official Journal L 291 , 19/11/1979 P. 0111 *

+++++

1 . IN THE FOLLOWING ARTICLES OF THE FOLLOWING ACTS , " 41 " AND " FORTY-ONE " ARE REPLACED BY " FORTY-FIVE " .

( A ) COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 76/160/EEC OF 8 DECEMBER 1975 ( OJ NO L 31 , 5 . 2 . 1976 , P . 1 ) :

ARTICLE 11 ( 2 ) .

( B ) COUNCIL DECISION 77/795/EEC OF 12 DECEMBER 1977 ( OJ NO L 334 , 24 . 12 . 1977 , P . 29 ) :

ARTICLE 8 ( 2 ) .

( C ) COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 78/319/EEC OF 20 MARCH 1978 ( OJ NO L 84 , 31 . 3 . 1978 , P . 43 ) :

ARTICLE 19 ( 2 ) .

( D ) COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 78/659/EEC OF 18 JULY 1978 ( OJ NO L 222 , 14 . 8 . 1978 , P . 1 ) :

ARTICLE 14 ( 2 ) .

( E ) THE COUNCIL RESOLUTION OF 15 JULY 1975 ( OJ NO C 168 , 25 . 7 . 1975 , P . 5 ) :

POINT 2 .

( F ) COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 79/409/EEC OF 2 APRIL 1979 ( OJ NO L 103 , 25 . 4 . 1979 , P . 1 ) :

ARTICLE 17 ( 2 ) .

2 . COUNCIL REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 1365/75 OF 26 MAY 1975 ( OJ NO L 139 , 30 . 5 . 1975 , P . 1 ) .

IN ARTICLE 6 ( 1 ) :

- " THIRTY " IS REPLACED BY " THIRTY-THREE " ,

- IN SUBPARAGRAPHS ( A ) , ( B ) AND ( C ) , " NINE " IS REPLACED BY " TEN " .

3 . COMMISSION DECISION 76/431/EEC OF 21 APRIL 1976 ( OJ NO L 115 , 1 . 5 . 1976 , P . 73 ) .

IN ARTICLE 3 ( 1 ) , " TWENTY " IS REPLACED BY " TWENTY-TWO " .

4 . COMMISSION DECISION 78/618/EEC OF 28 JUNE 1978 ( OJ NO L 198 , 22 . 7 . 1978 , P . 17 ) .

IN ARTICLE 3 , " 22 " IS REPLACED BY " 24 " AND " 18 " BY " 20 " .
# EUR-Lex - 12002E195 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E195

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Five: Institutions of the Community - Title I: Provisions governing the institutions - Chapter 1: The institutions - Section 1: The European Parliament - Article 195 - Article 138e - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0115 - 0116 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0262 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0056 - Consolidated version *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Five: Institutions of the Community

Title I: Provisions governing the institutions

Chapter 1: The institutions

Section 1: The European Parliament

Article 195

Article 138e - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 195

1. The European Parliament shall appoint an Ombudsman empowered to receive complaints from any citizen of the Union or any natural or legal person residing or having its registered office in a Member State concerning instances of maladministration in the activities of the Community institutions or bodies, with the exception of the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance acting in their judicial role.

In accordance with his duties, the Ombudsman shall conduct inquiries for which he finds grounds, either on his own initiative or on the basis of complaints submitted to him direct or through a Member of the European Parliament, except where the alleged facts are or have been the subject of legal proceedings. Where the Ombudsman establishes an instance of maladministration, he shall refer the matter to the institution concerned, which shall have a period of three months in which to inform him of its views. The Ombudsman shall then forward a report to the European Parliament and the institution concerned. The person lodging the complaint shall be informed of the outcome of such inquiries.

The Ombudsman shall submit an annual report to the European Parliament on the outcome of his inquiries.

2. The Ombudsman shall be appointed after each election of the European Parliament for the duration of its term of office. The Ombudsman shall be eligible for reappointment.

The Ombudsman may be dismissed by the Court of Justice at the request of the European Parliament if he no longer fulfils the conditions required for the performance of his duties or if he is guilty of serious misconduct.

3. The Ombudsman shall be completely independent in the performance of his duties. In the performance of those duties he shall neither seek nor take instructions from any body. The Ombudsman may not, during his term of office, engage in any other occupation, whether gainful or not.

4. The European Parliament shall, after seeking an opinion from the Commission and with the approval of the Council acting by a qualified majority, lay down the regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman's duties.
#### § 80.551 Applicability.

This subpart contains rules applicable to operational fixed stations.
Editorial Note on Part 300
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 300 appear at 64 FR 44431, Aug. 16, 1999, and at 76 FR 59305, Sept. 26, 2011.

§ 300.131 Conch harvest limitations. ( a ) *Size limit.* The minimum size limit for possession of conch in or from treaty waters is 7.94 oz (225 g) for an uncleaned meat and 3.53 oz (100 g) for a cleaned meat.
( b ) *Closed area.* The treaty waters of Quita Sueno are closed to the harvest or possession of conch.
( c ) *Closed season.* During the period July 1 through September 30 of each year, the treaty waters of Serrana and Roncador are closed to the harvest or possession of conch.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 2046** 

In R e: CLOREY EUGENE FRANCE , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

. (1:13

- cv - 00250

- JAB

- LPA)

Submitted : April 10, 2015 Decided: April 16, 2015

Before MOTZ and GREGORY , Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
Clorey Eugene France, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Clorey Eugene France petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012). He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find
the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis
and deny the mandamus petition. We deny France’s motion for release pending appeal and emergency relief, and dispense with oral argument b ecause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would n ot aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 31

RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS

I, Richard G. Hunter, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Food Technology
Service, Inc. (the "Company").

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statement made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects,
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The Company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15d-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

     (a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
consolidates subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures, and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's fourth
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The Company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

      (b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date:  March 31, 2008

By:  /s/ Richard G. Hunter, Ph.D.
Chief Executive and Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6340

STEPHEN TSE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

J. E. GUNJA, Warden, United States Bureau of

Prisons; M. ALBRIGHT; PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED

STATES,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA99-3639-DKC)

Submitted: May 25, 2000 Decided: June 6, 2000

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen Tse, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on

January 10, 2000, the district court’s records show that it was

entered on the docket sheet on January 11, 2000. Pursuant to Rules

58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the

date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as

the effective date of the district court’s decision. Wilson v.

Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Stephen Tse appeals the district court’s orders denying relief

on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition and denying his Motion for

Relief from Judgment. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Tse

v. Gunja, No. CA-99-3639-DKC (D. Md. Dec. 21, 1999 & Jan. 11,

2000*). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED