alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 11965F013 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11965F013

**TREATY ESTABLISHING A SINGLE COUNCIL AND A SINGLE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, CHAPTER II: THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, ARTICLE 13 **

*
Official Journal L 152 , 13/07/1967 P. 0006 *

++++

ARTICLE 13

IF ANY MEMBER OF THE COMMISSION NO LONGER FULFILS THE CONDITIONS REQUIRED FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF HIS DUTIES OR IF HE HAS BEEN GUILTY OF SERIOUS MISCONDUCT , THE COURT OF JUSTICE MAY , OR APPLICATION BY THE COUNCIL OR THE COMMISSION , COMPULSORILY RETIRE HIM .
#### § 25.51 General provisions.

Reasonable charges and fees may be established for public recreational use of and, except in Alaska, entrance onto national wildlife refuges. Regulations regarding recreational use fees are contained in 36 CFR part 71. Regulations regarding entrance fees are contained in this subpart E.
# EUR-Lex - 11957A153 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957A153

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY ( E.A.E.C. - EURATOM ), TITLE THREE - PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INSTITUTIONS, CHAPTER I: THE INSTITUTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY, SECTION IV: THE COURT OF JUSTICE, ARTICLE 153 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 153

THE COURT OF JUSTICE SHALL HAVE JURISDICTION TO GIVE JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO ANY ARBITRATION CLAUSE CONTAINED IN A CONTRACT CONCLUDED BY OR ON BEHALF OF THE COMMUNITY , WHETHER THAT CONTRACT BE GOVERNED BY PUBLIC OR PRIVATE LAW .
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Office of the Chief Counsel Enforcement Division

May 4, 2015 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl000 Federal Aviation Admiuistration 600 Independence Avenue SW Washington, DC 20591 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE RE: Inthe Matter ofSky West Airlines, Inc., FAA Case No. 2011NM060005, DMS No. FAA-2012-0777 800 Independence Ave., SW. Washington, DC 20591



# RECEIVED MAY 042015 

## HEARING DOCKET

Please be advised that, henceforth, I am the attorney ofrecord for the Complainant in the abovereferenced matter. Accordingly, copies ofall documents to be served should be sent to me at the following address: Enforcement Division, AGC-300 Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Federal Aviation Admiuistration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 Fax: (202) 267-5106 Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely,

-;

__..**--~·--,** ;\ ( \ I j \\ 

# "· lh**··~!i/1** 

### \ Ji) ,IJ_JA 

## /.tfti\J**~~** 

# v**\~/} L.,J~**  .. v \

- ... 11 J v Casey E.

### G~rd~k Attorney Enforcement Division, AGC-300 Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Federal Aviation Administration Telephone: (202) 267-5964CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this date I have sent the foregoing entry ofappearance by facsimile and by U.S. certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, to: Todd Emerson, Esq. SkyWest Airlines, Inc. 444 South River Road St. George, UT 84790 Fax: 435-634-3505 In addition, I certify that I have on this date personally delivered the original and one copy ofthe foregoing document to: Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl000 Federal Aviation Administration 600 Independence Avenue SW Washington, DC 20591

Dated: May 4, 2015 2
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT M ELINDA GAB R IELLA VALENZUELA, FKA Enrique M e nde z , Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. C OUNTY OF M AR IC OPA; e t a l., De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 14-17115 D.C . No. 2:14-c v-01153-NVW M HB M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ariz o na Ne il V. W ake , Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

Nove m b e r 18, 2015 ** B e fore : TASHIM A , OW ENS, a nd FRIEDLAND, C irc uit Judge s. M e linda Ga brie lla Va le nz ue la , a

n Ariz ona sta te prisone r, a

ppe a ls pro se from the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt dismissing her 42 U.S.C . § 1983 a c tion a lle ging Eighth Am e ndm e nt viola tions in c o nne c tion with her m e dic a l c are . W e have



# FIL ED N OV 27 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie w de novo thedistric t c ourt’ s

inte rpre tation a

nd a pplic ation of 28 U.S.C . § 1915(g). Andre w s v . C e rv ante s , 493 F.3d 1047, 1052 (9th C ir. 2007). W e a ffirm . Dism issa l of Va le n z ue l a ’ s a c t ion wa s prope r be c a use at le a st thre e of Va le nz ue la ’ s prior § 1983 ac tions we re dism i sse d a s frivolous or for failure to sta te a c la im , a nd Va le n zue la

did not pla

usibly a lle ge that

she wa s “ unde r im

m ine nt da nge r of se rious phy sic a l injury ” at the tim e she lodge d the c om p la int. 28 U.S.C . § 1915(g); Andre w

s , 493 F.3d a

t 1055 (a n e xc e ption to the

thre e -strike s rule s e xists only whe re “ the c om

p la int m ake s a

pla usiblea lle gation tha

t the prisone r fa c e d

‘ i m m ine nt da nge r of se rious phy sic a l injury ’ at the tim e of filing” ). Va le nz ue la ’ s re que st for a n orde r stating tha

t doc um e nts m

ust be m a ile d to the c ourt, file d on April 24, 2015, is de n i e d. AFFIRM E D.

1 4 - 1 7 1 1 5 2
Case 16-25993 Doc 4 Filed 08/12/16 Entered 08/12/16 16:16:49 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-25993 Doc 4 Filed 08/12/16 Entered 08/12/16 16:16:49 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

06/19

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 19 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL
#### § 20.40 Gift of migratory game birds.

No person may receive, possess, or give to another, any freshly killed migratory game birds as a gift, except at the personal abodes of the donor or donee, unless such birds have a tag attached, signed by the hunter who took the birds, stating such hunter's address, the total number and species of birds and the date such birds were taken.

[42 FR 39668, Aug. 5, 1977]
Case 16-27675 Doc 24 Filed 10/07/16 Entered 10/11/16 09:04:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
#### § 87.27 License term.

Licenses for stations in the aviation services will normally be issued for a term of ten years from the date of original issuance, or renewal.

[78 FR 25175, Apr. 29, 2013]
# National Farm Safety and Health Week, 2006

Generations of farmers and ranchers have strengthened our Nation and enriched our communities by providing us with food, raw materials, and energy. National Farm Safety and Health Week is an opportunity to celebrate their contributions to America and raise awareness about potential hazards these workers and their families face. This year's theme, “Prepare to Prevent,” underscores the importance of injury prevention, preparedness, and safety on farms and ranches. 

Farming and ranching are challenging occupations. Agricultural workers often work long hours and are exposed to many dangers associated with heavy machinery, tools, livestock, chemicals, and extreme weather conditions. By identifying hazards and taking preventive measures, farmers and ranchers can create a safer environment for themselves and their employees. Wearing protective gear can help prevent injuries, and farm machinery can be equipped with safety devices to decrease accidents. Agricultural workers can also take steps to make their workplace safer by training family members and staff in first aid and other emergency response techniques. 

Our country depends on farmers and ranchers to help provide an abundant and safe food supply for our citizens and for the world, and we are grateful to them for their significant contributions to the economic prosperity of our great Nation. By raising awareness about injury prevention and safety in the workplace, farmers and ranchers can protect their employees, families, and themselves, and continue their good work to help America stay productive and prosperous. 

                    NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim September 17 through September 23, 2006, as National Farm Safety and Health Week. I call upon the agencies, organizations, and businesses that serve America's agricultural workers to continue to strengthen their commitment to promoting farm safety and health programs. I also urge all Americans to honor our agricultural heritage and to recognize our farmers and ranchers for their remarkable contributions to our Nation's prosperity and strength.                          ( print page 54890)    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fifteenth day of September, in the year of our Lord two thousand six, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first. 

[FR Doc. 06-7952

Billing code 3195-01-P
[No. 2027.]

#### Neil McIntyre *et als. v.*The State.

1. Scire Facias.— Judgment Nisi is fatally defective unless it states that the same will be made final unless good cause be shown at the next term of the court why the principal did not appear.

*2.*Same — Bail Bond — Case Stated.— Neil McIntyre is the principal named in the body of the bond. The bond is not signed by the principal, unless Neil McIntyre and C. A. McIntyre be one and the same person. For aught that appears to the contrary, “O. A. McIntyre *”*may be the signature of a surety on the bond, and if so, the judgment *nisi*and final should, as they do not, show what disposition of the case was made as to him.

. Error from the County Court of Kaufman. Tried below before the Hon. J. E. Dillard, County Judge.

The writ of error in this case was prosecuted from a final judgment on the forfeiture of the bond of ¡Neil McIntyre, bailed upon a charge of misdemeanor theft. The amount of the bond and judgment was $100.

*J. & Woods,*for the plaintiffs in error.

*J. RL. Burts,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State. „

Hurt, Judge.

The judgment *nisi*is fatally defective in this: it fails to state that the judgment *nisi will he made final*unless good cause be shown at the next term of the court why the principal did not appear. This is demanded by the statute (art. 441, Code Crim. Proc.), and has been held to be absolutely necessary by a number of decisions of this court. *(Lindley*v. *The State,*17 Texas Ct. App., 120; *Burnett*v. *The State,*18 Texas Ct. App., 283, and cases there cited.)

It appears from the body of the bond that ¡Neil McIntyre is the principal. The bond is not signed by ¡Neil Mein tyre, unless C. A. *444McIntyre is the same person. Upon this subject the record leaves us in doubt. Now, it is not necessary that the principal sign the bond, but, as the record fails to solve this doubt, and as C. A. McIntyre may in fact be a surety, the record must show what disposition was made as to him. There is no judgment *nisi*or judgment final against him, nor, as above stated, are we informed that he is the principal.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

*Reversed and remanded.*

[Opinion delivered November 25, 1885.]
§ 296.12 Payment of costs. ( a ) *By person denying responsibility for damage.* Any person who is notified by the Interior Department and fails to respond or denies responsibility for the damages claimed will pay the costs of the proceedings if such person is subsequently found to be responsible for the damage claimed.
( b ) *By the claimant.* Any claimant who files a claim will pay the cost of the proceedings if such person is subsequently found to be responsible for the damage claimed.
( c ) *By person denying responsibility for damage and the claimant.* If more than one party is found to have responsibility for the damage claimed, then the cost of the proceedings will be apportioned between them.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"18-2221: BEBLEY v. AIR FORCE [OPINION], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"3OFrg5Uumr\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/8-02-2019-18-2221-bebley-v-air-force-opinion-nonprecedential-18-2221-opinion-8-2-2019\/\">18-2221: BEBLEY v. AIR FORCE [OPINION], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/8-02-2019-18-2221-bebley-v-air-force-opinion-nonprecedential-18-2221-opinion-8-2-2019\/embed\/#?secret=3OFrg5Uumr\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“18-2221: BEBLEY v. AIR FORCE [OPINION], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"3OFrg5Uumr\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Opinions\/Orders posted: BEBLEY v. AIR FORCE [OPINION](pdf) Appeal Number: 18-2221 Origin: MSPB Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
No. 11M92.

#### John Mezzalingua Associates, Inc. *v.*International Trade Commission.

Renewed motion for leave to file petition for writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record granted.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The Honorable John W. Sedwick, United States District Judge for the **

District of Alaska, sitting by designation.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision ***

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID TORREZ,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF

AMERICA, named as Corrections Corp.

Of America in original complaint, (CCA),

a corporation incorporated under the laws

of the State of Tennesee and licensed to do

business in Arizona; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 12-15541

D.C. No. 2:10-cv-00116-JWS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

John W. Sedwick, District Judge, Presiding**

Submitted September 24, 2013*** 

Before: RAWLINSON, N.R. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

FILED

OCT 04 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-15541

Former California state prisoner David Torrez appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action

for failure to exhaust administrative remedies as required by the Prison Litigation

Reform Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. 

We review de novo the district court’s dismissal for failure to exhaust and for clear

error any underlying factual findings. Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1117 (9th

Cir. 2003). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed the action because Torrez did not

exhaust prison grievance procedures and failed to demonstrate that prison officials’

tardy responses rendered exhaustion effectively unavailable. See Woodford v. Ngo,

548 U.S. 81, 85, 93-95 (2006) (holding that “proper exhaustion” is mandatory and

requires adherence to administrative procedural rules); Sapp v. Kimbrell, 623 F.3d

813, 822 (9th Cir. 2010) (exhaustion is not required where administrative remedies

are “effectively unavailable”). Moreover, contrary to his contentions, Torrez did

not show that he received favorable grievance responses rendering further appeals

unnecessary. See Akhtar v. Mesa, 698 F.3d 1202, 1210 (9th Cir. 2012) (no

exhaustion where pertinent relief remains available). 

Torrez’s contention that the district court erred by treating the issue of 
3 12-15541

exhaustion as a matter in abatement is unpersuasive. See id. at 1209-10.

AFFIRMED.
§ 32.3 What are the procedures for publication of refuge-specific hunting regulations? ( a ) Refuge-specific hunting regulations are issued only at the time of or after the determination and publication of the opening of a wildlife refuge area to migratory game bird, upland game or big game hunting.
( b ) Refuge-specific hunting regulations may contain the following items: ( 1 ) Wildlife species that may be hunted;
( 2 ) Seasons;
( 3 ) Bag limits;
( 4 ) Methods of hunting;
( 5 ) Description of areas open to hunting; or
( 6 ) Other provisions as required.
( c ) Refuge-specific hunting regulations will not liberalize existing State laws or regulations.
( d ) Refuge-specific hunting regulations are subject to change and the public is invited to submit suggestions and comments for consideration at any time.
( e ) We initially publish refuge-specific hunting regulations in the daily issue of the Federal Register, and subsequently they appear in §§ 32.20 through 32.72, except that the refuge manager may adopt and issue relevant refuge-specific season dates and times after the State establishes its hunting seasons by publication through one or more of the methods identified in § 25.31 of this subchapter C.
( f ) Refuge-specific hunting regulations may be amended or new conditions imposed at any time during the hunting season when unpredictable changes occur in wildlife populations, habitat conditions or in other factors affecting a refuge's wildlife resources. Changes in refuge-specific hunting regulations made under the conditions noted in this paragraph (f) can be in force only for the one season to which the changes apply.
[58 FR 5064, Jan. 19, 1993, as amended at 67 FR 58943, Sept. 18, 2002]
# EUR-Lex - 11957A164 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957A164

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY ( E.A.E.C. - EURATOM ), TITLE THREE - PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INSTITUTIONS, CHAPTER II: PROVISIONS COMMON TO SEVERAL INSTITUTIONS, ARTICLE 164 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 164

ENFORCEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY THE RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE IN FORCE IN THE STATE IN THE TERRITORY OF WHICH IT IS CARRIED OUT . THE ORDER FOR ITS ENFORCEMENT SHALL BE APPENDED TO THE DECISION , WITHOUT OTHER FORMALITY THAN VERIFICATION OF THE AUTHENTICITY OF THE DECISION , BY THE NATIONAL AUTHORITY WHICH THE GOVERNMENT OF EACH MEMBER STATE SHALL DESIGNATE FOR THIS PURPOSE AND SHALL MAKE KNOWN TO THE COMMISSION , TO THE COURT OF JUSTICE AND TO THE ARBITRATION COMMITTEE SET UP BY ARTICLE 18 .

WHEN THESE FORMALITIES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED ON APPLICATION BY THE PARTY CONCERNED , THE LATTER MAY PROCEED TO ENFORCEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL LAW , BY BRINGING THE MATTER DIRECTLY BEFORE THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY .

ENFORCEMENT MAY BE SUSPENDED ONLY BY A DECISION OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE . HOWEVER , THE COURTS OF THE COUNTRY CONCERNED SHALL HAVE JURISDICTION OVER COMPLAINTS THAT ENFORCEMENT IS BEING CARRIED OUT IN AN IRREGULAR MANNER .
# EUR-Lex - 11957A191 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957A191

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY ( E.A.E.C. - EURATOM ), TITLE FIVE - GENERAL PROVISIONS, ARTICLE 191 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 191

THE COMMUNITY SHALL ENJOY IN THE TERRITORIES OF THE MEMBER STATES SUCH PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES AS ARE NECESSARY FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF ITS TASKS , UNDER THE CONDITIONS LAID DOWN IN A SEPARATE PROTOCOL .
# Corporate Source

*Last Processed: Mon Jun 14 08:39:07 2021*
#### § 424.10 General.

The Secretary may add a species to the lists or designate critical habitat, delete a species or critical habitat, change the listed status of a species, revise the boundary of an area designated as critical habitat, or adopt or modify special rules (see 50 CFR 17.40-17.48 and parts 222 and 227) applied to a threatened species only in accordance with the procedures of this part.
§ 600.513 Recreational fishing. ( a ) Foreign vessels conducting recreational fishing must comply only with this section, and §§ 600.10, 600.504(a)(1), and 600.505 (as applicable). Such vessels may conduct recreational fishing within the EEZ and within the boundaries of a state. Any fish caught may not be sold, bartered, or traded.
( b ) The owners or operator and any other person aboard any foreign vessel conducting recreational fishing must comply with any Federal laws or regulations applicable to the domestic fishery while in the EEZ, and any state laws or regulations applicable while in state waters.
# EUR-Lex - 12002M027B - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002M027B

**Treaty on European Union (Nice consolidated version) - Title V: Provisions on a common foreign and security policy - Article 27 b **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0020 - 0020 *

Treaty on European Union (Nice consolidated version)

Title V: Provisions on a common foreign and security policy

Article 27

Article 27b

Enhanced cooperation pursuant to this title shall relate to implementation of a joint action or a common position. It shall not relate to matters having military or defence implications.
# EUR-Lex - 11994NN15/07/A1 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11994NN15/07/A1

**ACT concerning the conditions of accession of the Kingdom of Norway, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded, ANNEX XV - List provided for in Article 151 of the Act of Accession - VII. AGRICULTURE - A. GENERAL PROVISIONS - I. FADN **

*
Official Journal C 241 , 29/08/1994 P. 0326 *

VII. AGRICULTURE

A. GENERAL PROVISIONS

I. FADN

365 R 0079: Council Regulation No 79/65/EEC of 15 June 1965 setting up a network for the collection of accountancy data on the incomes and business operation of agricultural holdings in the European Economic Community (OJ No 109, 23.6.1965, p. 1859), as last amended by:

- 390 R 3577: Council Regulation (EEC) No 3577/90 of 4 December 1990 (OJ No L 353, 17.12.1990, p. 23).

Norway, Finland and Sweden shall comply with the nature of accounting data and the types of holdings required pursuant to Regulation (EEC) No 79/65/EEC by 31 December 1997 at the latest.