alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4184 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
Argued and submitted December 15, 1993,

remanded for entry of modified judgment and for reconsideration in part; otherwise affirmed February 2, 1994

#### In the Matter of the Marriage of Jeff Scott INSLEY, *Appellant, and*Shelley Rae INSLEY, *Respondent.*

(92DM0994; CA A80101)

868 P2d 17

Appeal from Circuit Court, Coos County.

Robert E. Jones, Judge.

Robert E. Brasch argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Brasch & Bauder.

No appearance by respondent.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Landau, Judges.

WARREN, P. J.

*193WARREN, P. J.

In this dissolution action, father appeals, assigning error to the award of custody of the parties’ children to mother. On *de novo*review, we conclude that father should be awarded custody.

The parties were married in 1984 and have two children, ages 7 and 5. Both parties work full time. Father brought this action to dissolve their marriage in 1993. At trial, several witnesses testified that mother was emotionally unstable, had a violent temper and had repeatedly attempted suicide. They testified that father was a very good parent and was primarily responsible for the children’s care. All of those witnesses had observed and interacted with mother, father and the children on numerous occasions over a period of several years. Two of the witnesses testified that mother was verbally abusive to the children.

On the other hand, mother’s co-workers and the children’s babysitters testified that mother appeared to be a good parent. However, they had far less extensive contact with the parties and their children than did the other witnesses. Finally, a counselor testified that she had seen mother professionally on nine occasions. She acknowledged that mother had emotional problems, but said that, in her opinion, mother was making progress in dealing with them.

The trial court awarded sole custody of the children to mother, finding that it was in their best interest to do so. On *de novo*review, we disagree. The testimony provided by persons with extensive first-hand knowledge of the parties and their relationship with their children convinces us that father will provide a more secure and stable environment for the children and that awarding him sole custody of the children is clearly in their best interest. *See*ORS 107.131(1).

Remanded for entry of modified judgment awarding custody of the children to father and for reconsideration of child support; otherwise affirmed. No costs to either party.
The USDA News is published by the Office of Communications, the
      U.S. Department of Agriculture. This employee news publication, which is
      prepared by, for, and about this Department's employees, is distributed to
      USDA's 107,000 federal employees--full-time, part-time, and temporary--by
      order of the Secretary of Agriculture. Mailing address is Rm. 440-A
      Whitten Bldg., OC, USDA, 1400 Independence Ave., SW, Washington, D.C.
      20250-1350.

To update your mailing address or change the quantity of USDA News
      copies received in your USDA office, please contact your agency's
      mailing/distribution specialist.

---

Ron Hall, Editor
      [email protected]

George Avalos, Art Director

Cedric Drake, Printing and Distribution Coordinator

Charles Hobbs, Home Page Coordinator
      [email protected]

---

The USDA News is also available on USDA's Home Page within the
      Internet. Use the World Wide Web to access that Home Page version. Simply
      type the Home Page address--or Universal Resource Locator (URL)--of the
      USDA News, which is http://www.usda.gov/news/pubs/newslett/cover.htm

USDA prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the
      basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability,
      political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or familial status (Not
      all prohibited bases apply to all programs). Persons with disabilities who
      require alternative means for communication of program information
      (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET
      Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD).

To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of
      Civil Rights, Room 326-W Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Ave. SW,
      Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA
      is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

The USDA News is printed on paper containing a minimum of 50
      percent waste paper. The USDA News is recyclable.

---

### Return to:

The USDA NewsCover Page
Editorial Note on Part 622
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 622 appear at 79 FR 57837, Sept. 26, 2014 and at 81 FR 32253, May 23, 2016.

§ 622.186 Landing fish intact. ( a ) South Atlantic snapper-grouper in or from the South Atlantic EEZ must be maintained with head and fins intact, except as specified in paragraph (b) of this section. Such fish may be eviscerated, gilled, and scaled, but must otherwise be maintained in a whole condition. The operator of a vessel that fishes in the EEZ is responsible for ensuring that fish on that vessel in the EEZ are maintained intact and, if taken from the EEZ, are maintained intact through offloading ashore, as specified in this section.
( b ) In the South Atlantic EEZ, snapper-grouper lawfully harvested in Bahamian waters are exempt from the requirement that they be maintained with head and fins intact, provided that the skin remains intact on the entire fillet of any snapper-grouper carcasses, valid Bahamian fishing and cruising permits are on board the vessel, each person on the vessel has a valid government passport with current stamps and dates from The Bahamas, and the vessel is in transit through the South Atlantic EEZ with fishing gear appropriately stowed. For the purpose of this paragraph, a vessel is in transit through the South Atlantic EEZ when it is on a direct and continuous course through the South Atlantic EEZ and no one aboard the vessel fishes in the EEZ. For the purpose of this paragraph, fishing gear appropriately stowed means that terminal gear (*i.e.,* hook, leader, sinker, flasher, or bait) used with an automatic reel, bandit gear, buoy gear, handline, or rod and reel must be disconnected and stowed separately from such fishing gear. Sinkers must be disconnected from the down rigger and stowed separately. See § 622.187(a)(3) for the limit of snapper-grouper fillets lawfully harvested from Bahamian waters that may transit through the South Atlantic EEZ.
[78 FR 22952, Apr. 17, 2013, as amended at 80 FR 80688, Dec. 28, 2015]
Exhibit











Exhibit 10.1








April 10, 2020


Raymond E. Scott
intentionally omitted
intentionally omitted


Dear Ray:


This letter agreement (this “Amendment”) shall supplement and amend the Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and between you and Lear Corporation (the “Corporation”), dated as of February 14, 2018 (as may have been previously amended, the “Employment Agreement”).  All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Employment Agreement. This Amendment confirms certain adjustments to your annual base salary in connection with the Corporation’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic.  Specifically, your annual base salary will be reduced by ten percent during the period beginning April 16, 2020 and ending on December 31, 2020 (such period, the “Waiver Period”).  In addition, twenty percent of your annual base salary otherwise payable during the Waiver Period will be deferred and paid to you during the period commencing on April 30, 2022 and ending on July 31, 2022, subject to accelerated payment if certain conditions are met; provided, that you remain continuously employed with the Corporation through the applicable payment date. 


The foregoing adjustments to your base salary shall be disregarded solely for purposes of calculating any Severance Payment that may become payable to you under the Employment Agreement in the event that you incur a qualifying termination of employment with the Corporation during the Waiver Period. In such event, the Severance Payment will be calculated based on your annual base salary as in effect immediately prior to the Waiver Period.


You hereby consent to the terms set forth in this Amendment and acknowledge and agree that the terms set forth herein do not constitute, and you hereby waive any right you may have to resign for, Good Reason pursuant to your Employment Agreement. Except as modified by this Amendment, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect; provided, that in the event that any provision in this Amendment conflicts with the Employment Agreement or any other agreement, policy, plan or arrangement between the Company and you, the terms of this Amendment shall govern.  Please sign on the following page where indicated.


Sincerely, 


LEAR CORPORATION


By: /s/ Harry Kemp
Name:    Harry Kemp
Title: SVP, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary




Acknowledged and agreed as of the 10th day of April 2020:




/s/ Raymond E. Scott____________________________
Name: Raymond E. Scott
[Crim. No. 2016.

Third Dist.

June 10, 1947.]

#### In re TRANQUILINO DEL ROSARIO ANCHETA, on Behalf of HAZEL VIRGINIA FLETCHER ANCHETA, on Habeas Corpus.

Gordon A. Fleury and Richard J. Lawrence for Petitioner.

THE COURT.

By means of habeas corpus the petitioner Tranquilino del Rosario Ancheta seeks to obtain release from the alleged restraint of the liberty of Hazel Virginia Fletcher Ancheta, his wife, by her parents. An answer to the petition denies the material allegations thereof. From the undisputed evidence adduced at the hearing by this court, it appears that Hazel, the wife, is not restrained of her liberty. There is no merit in the petition.

The petition alleges that Tranquilino del Rosario Ancheta and Hazel Fletcher were lawfully married in the State of Washington on March 17, 1947. That fact-is conceded by the answer. Hazel is fifteen years of age. After the marriage was consummated, and the spouses returned to California, Hazel was returned to her parents and is now living with them at their home in Yolo County. Hazel was sworn and testified positively, at the hearing of this writ, that she was not restrained of her liberty by either of her parents, and *256that she did not wish to return to her husband. Mr. R. V. Fletcher, the father of Hazel, testified that neither he nor his wife had forbade her returning to her husband, or had done anything to prevent her from doing so; that they had not restrained her of her liberty in any particular, but that, on the contrary, she was perfectly free to return to her husband whenever she desired to do so. There was absolutely no evidence to the contrary. Mr. Ancheta failed to take the witness stand in his own behalf. From the uncontradicted evidence it appears without conflict that the parents of Hazel are not restraining their daughter’s liberty, as alleged in the petition, or at all.

Ordinarily, the burden of proof is on the petitioner to show by a preponderance of evidence the alleged illegal detention. (13 Cal.Jur. 275, § 53.)  The asserted restraint of liberty must be shown to have been actual, illegal and involuntary. (13 Cal.Jur. 221, § 5.) No such showing appears in this case.

The writ is discharged.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

as adopted pursuant to

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      I,  Ronald  D. Sloan, the chief executive  officer  and  chief  financial
officer of Can-Cal  Resources  Ltd.,  certify  that (i) the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September  30,  2007, as filed by the Company
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, to which  this Certification is an
Exhibit,  fully  complies  with  the  requirements  of  Section  13(a)  of  the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (ii) the information contained
in  the  Form  10-QSB  financial statements fairly presents,  in  all  material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  Can-Cal
Resources Ltd.



                                           /s/  Ronald D. Sloan
					   --------------------
                                           Ronald D. Sloan,
                                           President, Chief Executive Officer
                                           and Chief Financial Officer

                                           Date:  November 14, 2007


This certification  accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Can-Cal Resources Ltd. and will be retained  by  Can-Cal  Resources
Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff  upon
request.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1171/2005

of 19 July 2005         

on import licences in respect of beef and veal products originating in Botswana, Kenya, Madagascar, Swaziland, Zimbabwe and Namibia

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal (1),

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2286/2002 of 10 December 2002 on the arrangements applicable to agricultural products and goods resulting from the processing of agricultural products originating in the African, Caribbean and Pacific States (ACP States) and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1706/98 (2),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2247/2003 of 19 December 2003 laying down detailed rules for the application in the beef and veal sector of Council Regulation (EC) No 2286/2002 on the arrangements applicable to agricultural products and certain goods resulting from the processing of agricultural products originating in the African, Caribbean and Pacific States (ACP States) (3), and in particular Article 5 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The following Member States shall issue on 21 July 2005 import licences for beef and veal products, expressed as boned meat, originating in certain African, Caribbean and Pacific States, in respect of the following quantities and countries of origin:

Article 2

Licence applications may be submitted, pursuant to Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2247/2003, during the first 10 days of August 2005 for the following quantities of boned beef and veal:

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on 21 July 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 July 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1899/2004 (OJ L 328, 30.10.2004, p. 67).

(2)OJ L 348, 21.12.2002, p. 5.

(3)OJ L 333, 20.12.2003, p. 37. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1118/2004 (OJ L 217, 17.6.2004, p. 10).

(4)OJ L 302, 31.12.1972, p. 28. Directive as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 807/2003 (OJ L 122, 16.5.2003, p. 36).

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


          <ARTICLE> 5

                    <LEGEND>  
                    THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
                    EXTRACTED FROM  AMERICAN ECO CORPORATION'S FORM 10-K
                    FOR THE YEAR ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED
                    IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
                    STATEMENTS. 
                    </LEGEND>        
                            
                    <S>                                  <C>
                    <MULTIPLIER>                       1000
                    <PERIOD-TYPE>     YEAR
                    <FISCAL-YEAR-END>           NOV-30-1997
                    <PERIOD-END>                NOV-30-1997
                    <CASH>                            1,259
                    <SECURITIES>                          0
                    <RECEIVABLES>                    52,474
                    <ALLOWANCES>                     (2,078)
                    <INVENTORY>                      18,079
                    <CURRENT-ASSETS>                108,642
                    <PP&E>                           46,801
                    <DEPRECIATION>                   (9,772)
                    <TOTAL-ASSETS>                  215,792
                    <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            48,735
                    <BONDS>                               0
                    <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
                    <PREFERRED>                           0
                    <COMMON>                         75,577
                    <OTHER-SE>                       29,522
                    <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    215,792
                    <SALES>                         220,478
                    <TOTAL-REVENUES>                220,478
                    <CGS>                           162,882
                    <TOTAL-COSTS>                   162,882
                    <OTHER-EXPENSES>                 33,386
                    <LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
                    <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                4,946
                    <INCOME-PRETAX>                  19,264
                    <INCOME-TAX>                      1,829
                    <INCOME-CONTINUING>              17,435
                    <DISCONTINUED>                        0
                    <EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
                    <CHANGES>                             0
                    <NET-INCOME>                     17,435
                    <EPS-PRIMARY>                      1.08
                    <EPS-DILUTED>                       .90
                             


</TABLE>
§ 95.2369 WMTS field strength limits. Each WMTS transmitter type must satisfy the field strength limits in this section. ( a ) For WMTS transmitter types operating in the 608-614 MHz band, the field strength of the transmitted signal must not exceed 200 mV/m, measured at a distance of 3 meters, using instrumentation with a CISPR quasi-peak detector.
( b ) For WMTS transmitter types operating in the 1395-1400 MHz and 1427-1432 MHz bands, the field strength of the transmitted signal must not exceed 740 mV/m, measured at 3 meters, using instrumentation with an averaging detector and a 1 MHz reference bandwidth.
N. Y. SUPERIOR COURT.

#### Edward Moore, plaintiff, agt. Patrick Devoy, defendant.

• In an action for assault and false imprisonment, an *ansiuer*of the defendant, after .denying all the facts set forth in the complaint, alleges, as a distinct defense “ by way of justification and mitigation, that whatsoever acts he committed in relation to the plaintiff, at the times and places specified in the complaint, were done without malice and in due discharge of his office, as deputy sheriff, and not otherwise,” is impertinent and irrelevant, and constitutes no defense whatever.

*Heard, Special Term, January,*1869.

*Decided, January*26, 1869.

Demurrer to answer. This is an action for an assault and false.imprisonment. The defendant denies each and every allegation of the complaint, and, *secondly,*avers, as a separate and distinct offence, *“*by way of j ustification and mitigation, that whatsoever acts he committed in relation to the plaintiff at the times and places specified in the complaint were done without malice and in due discharge of his office as deputy sheriff, and not otherwise.” The plaintiff demurs to this second defense so set up in the answer.

A. H. Reavy, *for plaintiff.*

W. F. Howe, *for defendant.*

Barbour, J.

The defendant had a right to confess the assault and imprisonment charged in the complaint, and avoid liability therefor, by an averment of sufficient facts to constitute a legal justification. But an answer,which, after denying all the facts set forth in the. complaint, alleges that whatever was done by the defendant was done by him as a deputy sheriff, is not only duplex, but the latter allegations are wholly impertinent and irrelevant, and constitute no defense whatever.

*19Besides, the facts, stated in the answer, that the defendant was a deputy sheriff and that what he did was done in the performance of his duty as such, do not amount to a justification for the alleged assault and imprisonment, in the absence of an averment that he acted under and in pursuance of process duly issued by a proper court or officer or for the purpose of preventing or suppressing a breach of the peace, or of arresting a person whom he had reason to believe tobe a felon in a case where a felony had actually been committeed. Indeed, I am not aware of any instance where a sheriff or other officer can legally arrest, imprison, or assault a man, without due process of law, in which any other citizen may not lawfully do the same thing.

The demurrer must be sustained, with costs to the plaintiff.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         526,005
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   74,823
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 965,564
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          274,313
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     691,251
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   965,564
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               215,834
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  371,566
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,092
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (118,640)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (118,640)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (118,640)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (10.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (10.46)


</TABLE>