alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P456Unresolved Cases: A Review of Protocols and Resources for Supporting Investigations Involving American Indians and Alaska NativesThe Missing or Murdered Indigenous Persons movement has brought new attention to the rate of unresolved crime in Indian Country or involving American Indians and Alaska Natives. Tribal law enforcement agencies often face challenges finding the resources - in money, time, and expertise - to investigate these cases. Unresolved Cases: A Review of Protocols and Resources for Supporting Investigations Involving American Indians and Alaska Natives compiles best practices and resource guides to assist tribal, state, and local law enforcement agencies in reviewing and investigating unresolved (or "cold") cases. Protocols for communications, record-keeping, and trauma-informed victim services; databases of personal and ballistic information; and physical evidence including DNA, fingerprints, and forensic dentistry are all detailed.By Bruce Budowle, Jeffrey Lindsey, B.J. SpamerCategories: TribalLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p456Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFBook • Apr 2022Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 00:38 (UTC-5) in 0.95 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
Lockheed Martin Mis siles and Fire Control

5600 Sand Lake Road Orlando, Florida 32819 - 8907 

### Exemption Letter for § 91.203 : Civil Ai rcraft, Certifications Required

June 15 , 2011

Mr. Richard Posey Federal Aviation Administration, AIR- 200 Inspector, Production and Airworthiness Division 950 L’Enfant Plaza SW Wa shington, DC 20024 Mr. Posey: Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control ( LMMFC ) opera te various Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) in the United States for missions related to research and development, crew training and market surveys. This new technology developed for the Department of Defense, and other public agencies will contribute to overall public safety. These operations support military and public agencies, homeland defense, border protection, law enforcement and local disaster relief. LMMFC operations shall meet or exceed equ ivalent levels of safety by use of proven engineering processes and superb quality control. LMMFC requests an exemption from 14 CFR 91 .203 to carry and display the certification and registration documents onboard the UA. Carrying the airworthiness certifi cate and aircraft registration in the UA is not practical since there is no pilot onboard the aircraft. An equivalent level of safety will be maintained by keeping these documents in or near the Ground Control Station where it will be available to the pilo t and crew at all times. Please contact me if you require additional information:



### Jacob A. Senior Orlando Aviation Consultants (OAC)

P.O. Box 621295 Orlando, FL 32862 - 1295 Phone: 321 - 794 - 4831 Fax: 407 - 350 - 3275
# EUR-Lex - 11985IN01/14/I - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11985IN01/14/I

**DOCUMENTS CONCERNING THE ACCESSION OF THE KINGDOM OF SPAIN AND THE PORTUGUESE REPUBLIC TO THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, ACT CONCERNING THE CONDITIONS OF ACCESSION OF THE KINGDOM OF SPAIN AND THE PORTUGUESE REPUBLIC AND THE ADJUSTMENTS TO THE TREATIES, ANNEX I: LIST PROVIDED FOR IN ARTICLE 26 OF THE ACT OF ACCESSION **

*
Official Journal L 302 , 15/11/1985 P. 0235 *

++++

( i ) Network for the collection of accountancy data on agricultural holdings

Council Regulation ( EEC ) No 79/65/EEC of 15 June 1965 ( OJ No 109 , 23 . 6 . 1965 , p . 1859/65 ) , as last amended by Regulation ( EEC ) No 2143/81 of 27 July 1981 ( OJ No L 210 , 30 . 7 . 1981 , p . 1 ) .

Article 4 ( 3 ) is replaced by the following :

" 3 . The maximum number of returning holdings shall be 75 000 for the Community .

On 1 March 1986 , the number of returning holidays shall be :

- 12 000 for Spain ; this number shall be gradually increased during the ensuing five years to reach finally 15 000 ,

- 1 800 for Portugal ; this number shall be gradually increased during the ensuing five years to reach finally 3 000 . "
U.S. Department of Justice

Office of Community Oriented Policing Services

 Fact Sheet cops.usdoj.gov

2021 COPS Office Preparing for Active Shooter 

Situations (PASS) Training Program Awards

The Office of Community Oriented Policing Services 

(COPS Office) Preparing for Active Shooter Situations 

(PASS) Training Program is designed to increase public 

safety by providing funds for scenario-based training that 

prepares officers and other first responders to safely and 

effectively handle active-shooter and other violent threats.

PASS Award

The 2021 PASS Training Program funded a project that will 

provide training to meet the goal of the 2016 Protecting 

Our Lives by Initiating COPS Expansion (POLICE) Act 

in offering “scenario-based, integrated response courses 

designed to counter active shooter threats or acts of terrorism 

against individuals or facilities.”1 

The awarded project is located on the COPS Office website 

at https://cops.usdoj.gov/programdocuments.

1. 42 U.S.C. § 3796dd(b)(17).

Funding Provisions

In FY 2021, the COPS Office awarded more than $9 million 

under the PASS Training Program. Funding was awarded 

with the following provisions:

PASS provides funds to training providers who can offer 

integrated, scenario-based response courses as described 

in the 2016 POLICE Act.

The PASS-funded provider has substantial experience 

with providing and tailoring cross-disciplinary active 

shooter training to law enforcement and other first 

responders nationally.

PASS funding may be used to provide supplemental 

resources to help officers maintain these vital but 

perishable skills—including scenario libraries and 

e-learning modules—and to enhance agency skills in 

tactical medicine and managing exposure to trauma.

 Contact the COPS Office

For more information about the COPS Office Preparing for Active Shooter Situations program, please call the COPS Office Response 

Center at 800-421-6770 or visit the COPS Office website at https://cops.usdoj.gov.

October 2021
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 29, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 136295 Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 136295 

 COA: 270900 

Wayne CC: 05-010650-01

BENNIE LEE BRYANT, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 6, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0721 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 29, 2008 

 Clerk
#### § 24.2 Scope of regulations.

The provisions in this part are in addition to, and do not supersede, other regulations in this chapter. Also, the U.S. Department of Agriculture administers the Plant Quarantine Act, as amended (7 U.S.C. 151 *et seq.*), the Federal Plant Pest Act, as amended (7 U.S.C. 150aa *et seq.*), and the Federal Noxious Weed Act of 1974 (7 U.S.C. 2801 *et seq.*), which contain authority for additional prohibitions and restrictions, including additional port of entry requirements, for the importation or exportation of plants (See 7 CFR chapter III for regulations containing prohibitions and restrictions under these authorities).
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Arnold Brown d/b/a Arnold Brown Construction Company v. Monica 

Hankins

Appellate case number: 01-15-00898-CV

Trial court case number: 2011-49521

Trial court: 189th District Court of Harris County

Appellant’s notice of appeal states he is appealing from an August 21, 2015 order 

denying appellant’s motion to set aside a previous interlocutory order, signed September 27, 

2015. We have jurisdiction to hear an interlocutory appeal only if authorized by statute. 

See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014 (West Supp. 2015); Stary v. DeBord, 

967 S.W.2d 352, 352–53 (Tex. 1998). 

On December 1, 2015, appellee filed a motion to dismiss, claiming the order is 

interlocutory and appellant has not paid for the clerk’s record in this case. We held this 

motion for a response, but none was filed. 

Unless appellant causes a supplemental clerk’s record containing documents 

showing the trial court has entered a final judgment or files a response demonstrating by 

citation to the law that this Court has jurisdiction of the appeal, this appeal will be 

dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f). Appellant’s 

response, if any, is due in this Court within 10 days of the date of this notice.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: December 17, 2015
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section
                     906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I, Colin Baird, Chief Financial Officer of Australian Forest Industries (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
March 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: June 21, 2006

/s/ Colin Baird
---------------------------
Colin Baird
Chief Financial Officer


                                       13
Case 16-24978 Doc 1 Filed 08/03/16 Entered 08/03/16 14:57:53 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 9
Case 16-24978 Doc 1 Filed 08/03/16 Entered 08/03/16 14:57:53 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 9
Case 16-24978 Doc 1 Filed 08/03/16 Entered 08/03/16 14:57:53 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 9
Case 16-24978 Doc 1 Filed 08/03/16 Entered 08/03/16 14:57:53 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 9
Case 16-24978 Doc 1 Filed 08/03/16 Entered 08/03/16 14:57:53 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 9
Case 16-24978 Doc 1 Filed 08/03/16 Entered 08/03/16 14:57:53 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 9
Case 16-24978 Doc 1 Filed 08/03/16 Entered 08/03/16 14:57:53 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 9
Case 16-24978 Doc 1 Filed 08/03/16 Entered 08/03/16 14:57:53 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 9
Case 16-24978 Doc 1 Filed 08/03/16 Entered 08/03/16 14:57:53 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 9
Argued March 17,

decided April 12, 1910.

#### STATE *v.*RICHIE. STATE *v.*LELAND. STATE *v.*DOWNING.

[108 Pac. 134.]

From Marion: George H. Burnett, Judge.

The defendants, Bollie Richie, Rose Leland and Julia Downing, were each tried and convicted of the crime of keeping a house of ill fame, and from the judgment and

sentence that followed, each appeals.

AFFIRMED.

For appellants there was a brief over the names of *Mr. John A. Carson, Mr. Thomas Brown,*$#. *William M. Kaiser*and *Mr. Myron E. Pogue,*with oral arguments by *Mr. Carson*and *Mr. Kaiser.*

For the State there was a brief over the names of *Mr. Andrew M. Crawford,*Attorney General; *Mr. John II. McNary,*"District Attorney, and *Mr. Walter C. Winslow,*Deputy District Attorney, with an oral argument by *Mr. Winslow.*

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Moore.

. The defendants, Dollie Richie, Rose Leland, and Julia Downing, were separately indicted, tried, and convicted of the crime of keeping and setting up, for the purposes of prostitution, fornication, and lewdness, houses of ill fame, to the possession of which, it is alleged, the defendants were severally entitled, and each appeals from the sentence pronounced against her.

These causes were by stipulation of the parties, tried in this court upon the same brief as in the case of *State*v. *McGinnis,*56 Or. 162 (108 Pac. 132). As these causes involve the same legal principles as stated in the opinion in the case mentioned, the conclusion there reached is decisive herein; and hence each judgment referred to is affirmed. Affirmed.
#### § 23.18 What CITES documents are required to export Appendix-I wildlife?

Answer the questions in the following decision tree to find the section in this part that applies to the type of CITES document you need to export Appendix-I wildlife. See [§ 23.20(d)](/on/2024-09-20/title-50/section-23.20#p-23.20(d)) for CITES exemption documents or [§ 23.92](/on/2024-09-20/title-50/section-23.92) for specimens that are exempt from the requirements of CITES and do not need CITES documents.

[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER27MY14.000/ER27MY14.000_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER27MY14.000/ER27MY14.000_original_size.png)

[[72 FR 48448](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/72-FR-48448), Aug. 23, 2007, as amended at [79 FR 30420](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/79-FR-30420), May 27, 2014]
Merrimack,

No. 4867.

#### Louis C. Wyman, *Attorney General v.*Hugo DeGregory.

Argued July 14, 1960.

Decided July 19, 1960.

*Louis C. Wyman,*Attorney General (by brief and orally), *pro se.*

*James C. Cleveland*(by brief and orally), for DeGregory.

Per curiam.

Petition for stay of an order of committal and for bail pending appeal from the order of committal to jail for contempt of court for failure to answer a question relating to the defendant’s membership in the Communist Party. The proceedings resulting in defendant’s committal were instituted under the provisions of RSA 588:8-a (Laws 1957, c. 178). It appears upon hearing and argument by counsel that an appeal questioning the constitutionality of this statute will be in order for argument at the next session of this court. Since this proceeding is the first one under the provisions of RSA ch. 588, inserted by Laws 1957, c. 178, and since it has been generally customary in this jurisdiction to grant bail pending appeal in such circumstances as here exist *(State*v. *Chaplinsky,*91 N. H. 527; *Wyman*v. *DeGregory,*100 N. H. 513), it is ordered in this case that the order of committal be stayed pending appeal and determination thereof upon such bail as may be fixed by the Superior Court.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 184 (Friday, September 22, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 55476]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8070]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology; American Health Information Community Biosurveillance Data 
Steering Group Meeting

ACTION: Announcement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the seventh meeting of the American 
Health Information Community Biosurveillance Data Steering Group in 
accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 
U.S.C., App.).

DATES: October 3, 2006 from 2 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20201), Conference Room 4090 (you will need a photo ID to enter a 
Federal building).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: During the meeting, the Workgroup will 
continue their discussion on the feasibility of filtering a Minimum 
Data Set.
    The meeting will be available via Internet access. Go to http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic.html for additional information on the 
meeting.

    Dated: September 18, 2006.
Judith Sparrow,
Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and 
Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology.
[FR Doc. 06-8070 Filed 9-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
# iCollege Looking to Hire Asst/Assoc/Prof of Systems Management - apply by June 6

/ Published May 6, 2016

JOB OPENING...

The National Defense University, Information Resources Management College invites interested persons to apply for the position of Assistant/ Associate/Professor of Systems Management (Information Assurance and Cybersecurity), AD-301-02/03/04 posted at USAJobs.gov.  The position is open from May 4, 2016 through June 6, 2016.   

If you are interested or know of anyone qualified who may be interested, please see below link for additional information and provide widest dissemination. 

https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/PrintPreview/437310700
#### § 90.687 Special provisions regarding assignments and transfers of authorizations for incumbent SMR licensees in the 809-824/854-869 MHz band.

An SMR license initially authorized on any of the channels listed in Tables 4 and 5 of § 90.617 may transfer or assign its channel(s) to another entity subject to the provisions of § 1.948 of this chapter and § 90.609(b). If the proposed transferee or assignee is the EA licensee for the spectrum block to which the channel is allocated, such transfer or assignment presumptively will be deemed to be in the public interest. However, such presumption will be rebuttable.

[69 FR 67852, Nov. 22, 2004]
#### § 20.109 Extended seasons, limits, and hours for taking migratory game birds by falconry.

This section provides annual regulations by which falconers may take permitted migratory game birds.

[44 FR 7148, Feb. 6, 1979]

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations affecting annual regulatory schedules for this section, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    In connection with the Annual Report of Reddi Brake Supply Corporation (the ACompany@) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Zwebner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  Date: October 10, 2006                                            By: /s/ Michael Zwebner Michael Zwebner Chief Executive Officer
§ 600.150 Disposition of records. ( a ) Council records must be handled in accordance with NOAA records management office procedures. All records and documents created or received by Council employees while in active duty status belong to the Federal Government. When employees leave the Council, they may not take the original or file copies of records with them.
( b ) Each Council is required to maintain documents generally available to the public on its Internet site. Documents for posting must include: fishery management plans and their amendments for the fisheries for which the Council is responsible, drafts of fishery management plans and plan amendments under consideration, analysis of actions the Council has under review, minutes or official reports of past meetings of the Council and its committees, materials provided by the Council staff to Council members in preparation for meetings, and other Council documents of interest to the public. For documents too large to maintain on the Web site, not available electronically, or seldom requested, the Council must provide copies of the documents for viewing at the Council office during regular business hours or may provide the documents through the mail.
[66 FR 57887, Nov. 19, 2001, as amended at 75 FR 59151, Sept. 27, 2010]
#### Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company v. Harmon’s Administrator.

(Decided March 23, 1917.)

Petition for rehearing, modification and extension of opinion.

HARKINS & HARKINS, WORTHINGTON, COCHRAN & BROWNING and F. T. D. WALLACE for appellant.

MAY & MAY for appellee.

Response to Petition for Rehearing, Modification and Extension of Opinion by

Judge Hurt

Overruling.

For original opinion, see 173 Ky. 1.

The question before this court in this case was, whether the appellee’s intestate, at the time of his death, was an employee of appellant and engaged in interstate commerce, so as to make appellant liable for damages on account of his death, in an action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act. The conclusion arrived at was, that he was not. The recovery was sought solely under the provisions of that statute. Hence the conclusion that the motion for a directed verdict should have been sustained. Whether, under the facts stated, there was a cause of action for any reason under the common law of the state, was not before us then nor now and was not considered. It was not necessary for this court, in order for appellee to take advantage of his common law remedies, if any he has, upon the return of the case to the trial court, for this court, in advance, to determine such rights and their nature and to give any direction in regard to same, as such questions were in no way before us upon the record. The result of the decision does not pre*851elude the appellee from seeking his remedy under the state law, if any he has, in accordance with the principles announced by this court in I. C. R. R. Co. v. Kelly, 167 Ky. 745; C., N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. Tucker, 168 Ky. 149; and C., N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. Hansford, 173 Ky. 126, upon the return of the case to the trial court..

Hence, the petition for rehearing, modification and extension of the opinion is overruled.