### 25456 Federal**~~r Vol** **~N~ ~t4.r/**  

### . J;,h

. .**~**



### ...

. s . .**~llY· .luJl~** **1989'/ Rules**  

### and Regulations**.> .;** **~~~~ ~~~~~~** **~~~ ~~** **~~ ~~~**  

### - .- ; :. · 

# . ..**~** 

# . .. --:- 

## ... . ; . . 

## . .. '• 

## . . .

### ~ ., -the 

### · de inini'mis SCi- erilisaion

### e~ption . • · -- froin proflibited ·dispersion techniques. 

### stack height

### rules for aew 

### soorcn ou September23. 1987l52 fR 357ot}). · · · · Source:;**we~e** exempted**{ro~** 

### further review 

### if they 

# ren under tfu! .. . - . . 

# r ,..- 

# \t:(:·:. grandfatbering clause**(i.e~** in existence before December 31, W70), 

### iftheir 

### atacit height was less than 

### de minimis stack hefght (65 m

### J, or 

### iftheir 

### actual height waa less 

# than the calculated Good · Engineering Practice 

### (CEPJ stack height. The remaining sources were 

### then subjected to detailed review for ; confonnance with the revised rqulatfons. State submissions were to contain an evaluation of each stack and**source~** the inventory. Mississippi bas indicated that the documentation is available for review at the State 

### Office (listed above}.- - - 

### FinalAction. EPA approves 

### the declaration by Mississippi that recent revisions to EPA·s stack 

### heigflt · regulations do not necessitate 

### SIP revisions for specific sources in 

### this

· state. The declaration does not apply tu. Mississippi Power-Daniel: South Mississippi Electric Power. HattiesburgMorrow; 

### E.L Dupont. Delisle-Boilers 

### 1 

## a 2: and International Paper. Vicksburg.

. ··-**~** . , Op January 30, 1987, Mississippi

· ·: ·. :**sub~tted** for EPA's approval

·**do ~ntation**  for 

### Good Engineering Practice (CEP) Stack 

## tfei8bL EPA piioposed 

### tO approve the declaration on February 18.1989 (54 PR 7069). At 

### that Under section 307(b}{ll of the 

### Act. petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by August 14, : 1989. This- action - may not be challenged later in proceedings to enfQrce its reqwremeuta. (See 307(b}{2.}.)

· . · , . time. 

### the public was invited to submit written comments on 

### the proposed · action. However, no comments were · · received. EPA is therefore approving the

State's declaration that 

### no e:nisaion · limitations were affected by stacJc height credit above 

### GEP or any other · dispersion technique, except as the declaration applies to four sources identified 

### below. . 

# C

- · :. : .· On january 

### 22. 

### 1988. the 

### U.S. 

# Court of 

# i · ·appeals for the DistriCt of Columbia 

### issued it• deciSion in 

### NRDC v. 

### ThomO$, The Office of Management and Budget bas exempted this rule from 

### the requirements of Section 3 o( Executive Order 12291. 

### List of Subjects 

### in CO CFR Part 52

· Air pollution controL Intergovernmental relations, Particulate matter, Sulfur 

### oxides.

Dsted: May 28. 1989. Joe R. Fraumll!thes, Acting &gfonal:idmiiWtrowr . Part SZ of Chapter 

### L Title . 40. Code of Federal Regulatiorts. is amended as follows: · ·**~38** F.2d 1224 

### (D.C. Dir . 

### 1988]. regarding

.the Eovfronmental Protection Agency's PART 52--[AMENDEDJ ' (EPA's} stack_ height regulations (50 PR 21892. July 8,

_ 1985); the 

### court upheld Subpart**Z-Mfs~fs'slpPf** ·

. . •. _ mos

_ t**0~** 

### the _ rules,



### _ but certain provisions

. , · . were remanded to the EPA 

### for 

### further
-- l. The authority citation for Part 52 -..- · : ·' · condderation: 'A.a:ordingly, EPA 

### is not " continues to read as follows:



### . acting oir fotir sources : Mississippi ' . . P n • 

### 1: 5 th**1.1:~-** • l El . Authority: 42 U. S .C. 7401-7642. ·. · _. . . ower'Liante •**~ ~aastpp**  . ectric . . . · . · Power,**Hafti~,btirg·¥cmow:** E.L Dupont, . 2. Section 52.1.278 i• added 

### to read 

### as

.Delisle-Boilers 1 

## a 2:' and Intemational follows; . , ·**~** . · ,. .-: :, -; ·

. ·**~per, 'Vichbut8** **becii~ thef**  _. · · . ·

. currentfY.. receive credit under one ·or the 

### f 52.1271 · 

# Controi stT.tegf: Sulfur 

## oxides · provisions remanded to the EPA. .. • and partlcufate 

### matter .' . ' ·. Mississippi and EPA will review these In a letter dated

### Ja~~ary 30,1987; the sources**~or** campUance with any revised Mississippi Department ofNatural

.requirements when EPA completes . .**Reao:.~rces** certified that DO 

### emasion**rulemaki~g** to respond to the 

### NR:JC limits 

### in the State's 

### plan are bued 

### on remand. · · · · · dispersion**techn!qu~** not permitted by

EPl'. 

### &milw. EPA has**re~ie~ed** . . .. EPA's aleck height rules. 

### This Mississippi 

### a submittal and 

## COnCurS With . certification does not appJy**:** the conclu3ion that no revisions to ..**Miss :~aippi**  Power-Daniel; South Mississipp1s existing sonree

### emisaio~**Miuisaipp~** Electric Power. Hatt i r.sburglimitationa are necesaary as a result of Morrow; E.I. Dupont. Deli::!e Boilers 1 

### tt

. · EPA'• reviaed stack height regulations. 2; and**ln~e:national P~per.**  Vicksburg. : :

· Mississippi has therefore met its [FR Doc. 119-t4Zl 9 ·

Filed 

### a- 1 4-89: 

## a ; 45 amJ

. · . ._: obligationsundersectlon406ofPub.L - .. .- .. .. .,...._, .. . , .· .**-',! i;~'a~**  

### · 9s-:95 for Uisting source ' emission 8II..Lrt**~** m•--1,0:& ,**$'**

### 10**~{-: H~~uons;** **~EPA** approved Miss1siippi'5 · · -· ._ ,,'

## &.g**·~· ··** **~:~ !.** **:>** 

# '· · ·.
_

.**~** • • ! ' . • :. -.**f·** .. : 40 CFR Part 52 · lFRL**3572-~** [TN-G4SJ Approv&:L 

## and Promulgation of**~** Implementation Plana, T

### efV\esaee; Revisions to 

### the Memphis and Shelby County Portion of the State hnplementation Plan**AGENCY:)~nvirorunenlal** Pro tection Agency 

### (EPA) . AC'nON' 

### rma! rule. SUMMARY: On Juiy 7, 1986. 

### the State of Tennessee submitted the Memphis and Shelby County regulatforu (Board Order 17-86) as a revision to the Slate Implementation Plan (SIP} . The . regulations tor Memphis and She!by 

### County were originally approved by EPA in 1972 as an appendix fo the SIP. Since that time the regulations have been revised HVeral 

### times and today EPA 

### is approving the regulations that are approvabht and disapproving the regulations that 

### are unapprovable and taking no action on those regulations that w_ere never approved or disapproved for the State. DATES: This action will be effective on August 14. 1989 unless no!ice is received by July 17, 1989 that someoae wishes to submit adverse or citical comments. 

### II the effective date 

### is delayed, timely notice will be published 

### in the Federal Register. · ADDRESSD: Copies ofmaterials submitted by the State may be**~fned** 

### during normal business hours

· at the following locations: Public Information.**R8fere~** Unit.

_ Librar}t §ystems 

## BraDCb.. . ·

. Environmental Protection Agency. 401 

### ·M. Street . SW ..**Wasbingto~** DC · 20480 ' .. . . .. .

## Enviro~ntal**Prot~~ii** Agency. · Resfon 

### IV. ' Air Programs Branch. 345 Courtland Street. 

### NE.. Atlanta, 

### GA


## . 30385. . . . . Division of Air Pollution ControL

Tennessee Department ofHealth and Environment, Customs House 4th Floor, 701 Broadway. Nashvii!e. Tennessee 37219 . . Memphis and Shelby County**H~lth**

Department. 

### Air PoUution 

### Cootrol. 814 Jefferson Avenue.**~emphis.** Tennessee 38105 . · FOR FURTHER**INFO~MATlON** CCNTACT: Ms. Rosaly:1 D . Hughi! s, Air Programs Branch,**EP~** Region IV, at the.above address nnd telephone number (404) 347-2.864 or FTS 25i-21!1H .**SUPPU.~ENTAAY IN~RllllATION:**  In 19€7, the Memphis and Shelby**CoWlty H~talth**  Department developed regulations for lhc r.ontrol of air poll u!i o:t. In lt'7Z. the.. . . . . .. **li/~. ~~;.~**  **(:t"** 

### .. .. . .· . :. • • .. . . • .. .. . .... . _,, ,.

_ ____ _ ... . .. .... . **·'~· ~....;!'**  c... ; · . ; 

### Federal Register/ VoL



## ~.:..NCi. **l14 '.f**  **ThUrSdil~~ J,ine~:J989Ll:.BuleS.~([Rtijiil8~~**  **~i2SID** 

## , State of Tennessee. submitted its Stale Section

**1&-47-Abbrt~Yiation8,** Acronyms IT 

### Implementation Plan (SIP) for the · Symbols .

**conlro~** 

### of air .·pollutlon. On May 31, 1972 Section 18-48--Worda. Phrose8 -Substitutecl 

### {37 FR t0842 . at 10894) EPA approved the , in Slate Rllaulatio,. Adopted by 

### SIP for Tennessee. The 

### SIP contained a



### &fert~na ·
**~on1~penBwmmg** 

### section that recognized the Air 

### Pollution Section 18-51-&VIIrabi/ity of Parts of 

### Control Section of the Memphis "8nd · Articles · . · · 

### Shelby

**Co~ty** 

### Health

**Depa~ent** 

### ai 5\ction

**1e-s&-Noti~:** Citation: Injunctive . 

### the local agency for air pollution control &lief 

### and included a control strategy . . Section 18-57-Pena/tiu. Misdemeanor. 

### demonstration along with 

### the Health Civil. NoncomplianCII 

### Department regulations. Since thai time. Section 1e-s&-Varicurc:e. 

### the Memphis and Shelby County Air Section 18-59-EmelJIIncy Powers of Health 

### Pollution Control Section (Memphis) has



## Sect~'f!f.::.



# 11 **-ef'tl0ted**

**: Membersh~o:**  Term 

### revised the regulations. Memphis • of Office: Jurisdiction: Hearings: ApptJaiJ 

### adopted certain portions of the Stale Section

**1&-~onp1'0CIIs8** Emiuion 

### regulations, revised their old reguiations • Standards 

### (State

**rqula !fo**  **~ 1.~)**  

### and recodified· the-air pollutfon control --

**SeCtion 1~Volatile**  Oijanic . 

### section·. of the Memphis and Shelby Compound' . · 

### (State

**a~on** 1200-3-



### . County Code accordingly. . 18) · .

**.:~-** 

### ·

. The new regulations were submitted Section

**~6-84-Partrculate ~otter**  from 

### to EPA by the State of Tennessee as a lncrneraton . - ·· · - · : · 

### SIP . . Section 16-85-Requtf'tldSamp!Jng, 

### revtsto!' (Board

**O~der** 

### 17-86) on July Recordlfll and &porting 

### (State 7. 1986 _. 

### This

**s~** 

### reviston

**~as** 

### not ' rqulatlon 1200-3-10) ·.· - processed earlier because tt w..s unclear Section

**t~lllhods** of Sampling and 

### which Memphis/Shelby County Analysis 

### (State regulation 1200-3-tZ) regulations had already been approved Section 1&-81-Limits on Emis•ion•

**du~** to 

### as part of the Tennessee SIP. 

### Abo, EPA Malfunctions. Startup8 and Shutdowns 

### had to determine 

### if the previous control ... (State regulation l.ZO()-.}-ZO) strategy demonstrati ons were ade quate '.

**Sec~on** 1&-39-FugitiVII Dust . . . 

### in protecting the National Ambient Air · 

### Section 16-flO--GeneralAlternative Emissron 

### Q 

### 1. 

# s d 

### d

**~** Standards 

### (State rqulation 1200-3-Zl)

**~** 

### ua tty tan ar s

**(NAAQ~}.** 

### Once the Section 16-81-LeadEmiuion Standard$ 

### t federally approved Memphis/Shelby (State regulation 12(1()..3-22) .

**County** 

### portion of the Tennessee 

### S . . · · · ·

**~**

**~**

### . ... i was compiled and the previous control Sec. tions 16-?6



### ~d **1~1 ar~**  the 

### New 

### i s t rategy .demor.strations were deeme . **So~e Pe:fo~O!I:~~**  Sla_IJiiaras 

### and 

### adequate, 

### EPA decided to approve the

**~** 

### Hazardous 

### Air Contamznants, . . . . Memphis/Shelby regulations 

### as a

**-~** 

### respectively. These standards, which



### transf **~r .**  **~f** enforcement authority from ·



### ~ are ilot part of the



### ~IP. **a~** subdelegated the State to the .locaL The following . to Memphis by

**~eState.** 

### . conditions i.nd conclusions were used to 

### In Section 16-77, 

### Construction and aqive· at 

### this deCision: . . 

### Operating Permits (State regulation .

: 1 . **~e:J;o ~l·~**  **tion5** 

### must be · equal

**~}** 

### all

**po~ons are**  **app~vable** 

### to the CC?rrespondlJ:lg

**fe~er!lllY** 

### approved except the folloYI1D8 rules which are not State regulations. ·· . · approvable because they.a

_ re . · 2. .

The loc;at regulations cannot be . inconsistent with EPA regulations and treated

**al separable**  **trom** 

### the SIP, which policies: . the

**Stat~ ~~~piits**  

### and

**i~plements,** 

### but

**~.01(3)** 

### must be consu;lered part of iL

**1~.01{4)(o)(2)** 

### · 3.



### Te~~!~ee **~~~law ~uires**  that No ·· action will be taken on the the local



### ~lations be equtvalent to ?r following because they are not part of not less stringent than the correspondmg . the federally approved regulations for State regulation: therefore, Tennessee th Stat . must certify to EPA that each regulation e .



### ~· has been reviewed by the State and .. **~.ot(4)(b}(6)** 

### the last phrase found to" meet this requiremenL ' · · 4. 

### Tennessee inust retain overall authority and responsibility for developing and implementing. including enfon:ing, the SIP. ·.:' ·.

· EPA compared the federally approved State regulations and the federally approved Memphis regulations to determine the approvability of the Memphis regulations. A summary of the review ·foUows. · · · · , .., . ·. .. . .· · · ·These seetions are approvable in their entirely: • Note: EPA Rqion IV notln.d both the Tennesate and MemphU 

# .,end•• of the SIP deviations that have been Identified within the Volatile OJ1tnic Compounds Rqulation (Seeticin 1&-410) and the need for their conectlon In a letter dated November 8. 1981 . The devlatioM. however, do not affect the approvabillty

**of~·** Volatile Orpnlc Compounda Replatlon few Mempbia becaun appiovabillty of the local replatlona is baled on a transfer of enforcement authority of federally approved resU!ilttoM. which Include the Volatile 011anic Compolinda Rtplatlon. from the State lo the local Ooce TenniPet baa c:Orrected thon deviations identifled by EPA. Memphis will adopt the corncted f'el\lltUon by reference . **~.OZ(1H3),** 

### (6Ht0) and· . the tilst section of(S) - · : · · · ... 1zoo..3-9..:.03(2) the last sentence , ( -:; 1200-3-&-.00(5)' . . .. '



### In Section 16-82, 

### Sulfur Oxide · · 

### i::;-;: Emissions (State

**~ation** 1200:-3-141 , 

### these rules are approvable because they are identical to

**th~** 

### federally approved State regulation: . 1200-.3-14-.01

**~14- 03(1HS)**  

### and (8H9)

No action will be taken on the following rules because they are not part of the federally approved State regulations: ·

**1~14-.02** 

### 1.200-3-!'4-.03{5) and (6)

Section 16-M. 

### Nuisance Abtlteme .'!t, was:originally approved as part 

# of the . SIP

**~** 

### 1972. Since that time Memphis J 

### has added a

**p~ragraph** 

### (b) dealiDg with . odor j,ollulion which EPA 

### will not take action on 

### at 

### this tilDe. Paragraph

**(a~** 

### was approved and 

### fa reapprovable . · -·



### . In Section 16-83, 

### Visible Emissions (State regulation 120G-3-5), 

### these are approvable because they are part of the federally

**app~ved** 

### State regulation:

**01** 

### (l) ·and (4)

**1~ 03{1)**  1200-3-5-.04



### No actfon will be taken on the following rules because they are · not

# c part of the federally approved State

**:~** 

### regulations: · · ·

**~** 1200-3-5-.01 {2) 

### and {3) 1200-3-5-.D% . ..

**12~.03(2)**

**12~.05** 

### ' ·· · .. ·

### . .



### In Section 

### 1&-:-78, Pl'()Qss Emissions Standalds (Stataregulation

**~7),** 

### these rules are approvable 

### beCause they are federally approved rules for the State: · · · · · ·· :: · ·

**1~7-.01** 

### 1zoo.4-7-..o2 . UQ0-3-7-.00(1) : ... ' . . . . 1.201).:.3.-7-.cM 

### {1) arid . (2) except the last

**sentan~** 

### . · · . . ·.. .

**1~7-.05**

**1~7-.06**

**~7-.D7{1)** 

### 1200-3-7-.08 .



### 1200-3-7 **10** .. · _ . . . . .. . . ..

**1200-3-7~.11** 

### ' - ' . ·... ·.. ... .·: ·.. -

**1zoo.3:-7~.1~** . I • . ••: • . ,.



### No action will be taken on the following rules because they aie not federally approved for the Stale: 1200-3-7-.0S{%) . . . . . 

### 1zoo.:.3-7-.D4{2) the last sentence 1200-3-7-.o7(2HSl

**1200-3-7-.~** 

### . . . . . .. . 

# e-,..

Section 16-49, 

### Ambient Air Quality,

**;:;:~·** 

### Standards (Stale fegulalion 1200-3-3' · approvable in 

### Its entirety, except for · .,

### /_ **~** 

# .

**;~** 

### 25458

**~~eral** 

### . Jtesist:e. r / V o l.

**No.** 

### .U4 

## J . 1'luusdaY\ · ·Juna 

### -15. 1989 /

**R~Ies** 

### · and Regu)ations 

# .. last sentence in

**-OS.** on which no action will be taken.



### In Sec:tion 

### 16-48. 

### Definitions, all the definitions 

### are identical to the federally approved State regulatiol)a except for the dafiDillona ofmodification. new source 

## aDd new ' sulluric acid planL These definitions. however. were found to be equivalent to the State's definitions and are federally approvable . F"maiAdion

Since the Memphis regulation• (Board Order 

### 17-88)

**a~** corai1tent with 

### EPA policy and requirements, they 

### are hereby approved except for the followina rules 

### that are daapproved:

**1.~,01(3)** 1200-3-9-.o1(4)( 0 )(2)

**Th~** public should be advised that this action 

### wiU be effective 110 day• 

### from the date of thi1 Federal 

### Repstu notice . However . 

### Ifnotice 

### is received within 30 · days that someone wishes 

### to submit

advel'M or critical comments, this action will be withdrawn and two subsequent notices will be published before the effective date . One notice 

### will withdraw the final action and another will begin a new rulemaking by announcing a proposal of the action and establishing a conunentperioCL ·

Under 

### section 307(b}(1) of the Act. petitions for judicial 

### review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate · circuit by 

### [60 days from date of

**publication~**

**.** This action may not be challenged ater 

### in proceedings 

### to enforce ita requirements . 

### (See 307(b}(2) .)

**R~Proces.**

. 

### U~r the Regulatory Flexibility Act ' 

### (5 U. S.C. 

### 605(b)), EPA must assess tha . impact of proposed rules on 

### small entities. Theae rules are**~quivalent** to · the federally approved State regulations and

**ma~nta~**

**.** the status quo. Sourcea . have not bem jdverse!y affected by the State regulations; therefore the . conclusion can be drawn that small sources 

### in Memphis and Shelby County will not be adversely affected by 

### this decision .

The Office of Management and Budget has waived review of 

### this action. normally required under ExecUtive Order 12291 . List of Subjects 

### i.n 40 CFR. Pad 5Z

Air pollution control. 

## earlxm Monoxide. Hydrocarboaa.lncorporation 

### by reference, lntergovemmental relations, Lead. Nitrogen dioxide, 

### Ozone. Partieuhate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Sulfur oxldes. Note: **lnc:orpon~tion** by reference of the · Slate Implementation Plan for the State o fT

### wu epprond by the Dinldor of the Fedaal ....._. CJD }11ly 1. 1911%.

Dated : Ap ril 24. 1989. Lee A. Oeffilm.. 

## m. Acting ll6aionalAdmini1trotor . 

### Part 52 of Chapter 

### L Title 40 . Code 

### of Federal Regulations, is amended as follows: PART 52 ·-{AMEHDEDJ Subpart RR-

### Tennessee

1 . The authority citation for Part U continues to read 

### as follows;

Autbodty: 

### u

**u~ 7401~**  2. Section 52.2220 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(89) to read 

### aa follows : 

### f 52.2220 ldendfk:aUon of plan. 

## • • • 

## •

(c) " • • (89) Revised Memphia 

### and Shelby County regulationa (Board 

### Order

**17~6)** submitted on 

### July 7. 198&.

(i) lncorporation by reference. (A)

**M~mphis** and Shelby County regula tiona. Board Order

**17~** which became State-effective 

## June 18. 1988 . The regulationa that are approved are as follows : Section• 18-48 Sections 1&-17 Sections 18-48 Sections 1&-48 except for lal• 1zoo...3..3-.0S (the lut

**~tntmce}** Sectioaa 18-50 Sections 1W1 Sectiooa 1&-86 Sectioa.a 1&-57 Sections 

### is-sa ·. Sectiom 1&-SV Sectioml&-71 Sections 18-n except for Rulaa

**1~** V.01(3): 12ro-3-9-.D1(4}(bJ(eJ(Ihe pm.se.

. • .ucept the activitiet ofaay v-L ")

. 120()-3..t-.D1(4)(o)(2) ; 1200.3-9- .02(1)- (3) ,( 1H10) and the raet

**~tnrence** or (5): · 120()-3..t-.o3(2)(tblut sentmar). ·



### .G3(2K•J. and .03(2J{b) Sectiom 18-711 except lor Rules

**1~7-**

**JJ3(~** 1.20().4-7-.ot(2)(the lut Mntence):

. **t~7-.07(2H5):** 1200-3-7-.09 Sectlon1 18-7V Sections 18-10 Sections 1a.:az uapt for lala 1200-3-H- .OZ: l2110-3-14-.o3(5) and (8) Sectiocu 15-83

**c.~ept** for Rulu
**1~** .01(2)

**~tnd** (3} : 1200-3-5-.03(.:) Section• 18-84 Sections t&-a;; Sectionst&-as Sections 18-87 Sect ions ta-te axcept para.,aph(bJ Section• 18-ISI Seetiona 1&-00 Sectiona 16-9\ (B) Letter or July 7. 1988. from the Tennessee Department or Health and Environment.

(ii) Other material-none . 3. A ne\¥ § 52..2229 

### is added to read aa foDows : · 

### I 52..2229 Rules and
**r~ulrions.**

(a) The following portions of the revised Memphis and · Shelby County regulations submitted on July 7, 1986. are disapproved because they are inconsistent with 

### EPA policy and requirements: 16-77, Rules **~.D1(3); t~**  .ot(4)(o}(2) (b) (Reserved} (FR Doc. 89-14154 Filed 6-14-8: 8:45 ami I&JJNG coot ........ 

### 40 CfR Part 60

**(FAL-3602~1** Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources; Surface Coating of Plastic Parts for Business t.lachlnes; Clarification AGENcr. Environmental Protection Agency 

### (EPA} . ACTIOIC Final rule. clarification. . SUMMARY: This notice clarifies a final rule od standards of performance for new stationary soarces 

### for surface coating of plastic 

### parts for business . machines which appeared at page 2876 

### in the

**Faden~)** Rep.ter ofFriday, Janury 29, 1988 (53 FR 2678).



### This action Ia necessary 

### in order to


### · clarify that electromagnetic interference and radio fr

_ equency interference 

## (F:Ml/ RFI) shielding coatings that are applied to the surface of plastic bus iness machine parts to attenuate 

### EMI/Rfl signals weT1! intended to be exempt from the regulation . EFFECTtVE DATE: January

**~** 1988. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug 

### Bell or Laura Butler. Standa. rds Development Branch. ESO (MD-13}. U.S. Environmental Protectioa 

### A,mcy. Research Triangle Park. North Carolina 27711. tel!!phone (919} 541-5568 or (919} 541-5Z67. IUPPUIIEHTARY INFORUAllON: The EMii RFl shielding coatings were exempted because none of the options studied provided volatile organic compound emission control 

### ala reasonable coal 

### 1.-.a dennition of prime coat specifially e."<cluded 

### EMI/RFl coatings to avoid erroneoua consideration of 

### E.\.li/RFl coatings as prime coatings .