alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 530.3 Typical classes of action. Section 1507.3(b)(2), in conjunction with § 1508.4, requires agencies to identify typical classes of action that warrant similar treatment under NEPA with respect to the preparation of EIS's or environmental assessments. As a general matter, the Commission's activities do not include actions for which EIS's or environmental assessments are required. Its activities involve: ( a ) Consultation with and recommendations to other Federal agencies for actions relating to marine mammal protection and conservation for which an EIS or environmental assessment is either not required by the NEPA regulations or for which an EIS or environmental assessment is prepared by another Federal agency; and
( b ) Research contracts relating to policy issues, biological-ecological data needed to make sound management decisions, and better methods for collecting and analyzing data. These activities are not, by themselves, major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment and the Commission's activities are therefore categorically excluded from the requirement to prepare an EIS or environmental assessment except for proposals for legislation which are initiated by the Commission, for which the Commission shall develop environmental assessments or EIS's, as appropriate, in accordance with the NEPA regulations. The Commission shall independently determine whether an EIS or an environmental assessment is required where: ( 1 ) A proposal for agency action is not covered by one of the typical classes of action above; or
( 2 ) For actions which are covered, the presence of extraordinary circumstances indicates that some other level of environmental review may be appropriate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1996 AND THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997,
1996 AND 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM
10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>   
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997 
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997  
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997 
<CASH>                                          23,065 
<SECURITIES>                                    45,383 
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,079  
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,141 
<INVENTORY>                                          0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                97,930 
<PP&E>                                          19,450
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,123
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 106,944 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,181 
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0 
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                       181,556   
<OTHER-SE>                                           0 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   106,944
<SALES>                                         43,687 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                54,544 
<CGS>                                            1,677 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,743 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,471 
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,736  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,735 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0 
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,735 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.12  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.12 
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6512

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DOUGLAS ALAN JARVIS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CR-91-70-N, CA-97-524-2) Submitted: July 30, 1998 Decided: August 26, 1998 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Douglas Alan Jarvis, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) and the court’s subsequent denial of his motion for reconsideration of his § 2255 motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we denya certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Jarvis , Nos. CR-91- 70-N; CA-97-524-2 (E.D. Va. Dec. 9, 1997 and Feb. 18, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit



Exhibit 4.1



SCHOLASTIC CORPORATION
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES


As of May 31, 2020, Scholastic Corporation had one class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended - the Common Stock.


I. DESCRIPTION OF OUR COMMON STOCK


The following is a description of the material terms of our Common Stock as described in the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation and any amendments thereto and our amended and restated by-laws, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated by-laws. We have filed copies of these documents as exhibits to our periodic reports filed with the SEC each of which are incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of which this Exhibit is a part.


Our authorized capital stock presently consists of: 4,000,000 shares of Class A Stock par value $.01 per share, 2,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $1.00 per share and 70,000,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $.01 per share. As of June 30, 2020, 32,530,986 shares of Common Stock were outstanding, 1,656,200 shares of Class A were outstanding and zero shares of Preferred Stock were outstanding.


Voting Rights


The holders of the Class A Stock and the holders of Common Stock are entitled to one vote per share on matters on which they are entitled to vote. The only voting rights vested in the holders of Common Stock, except as required by law, are the election of such number of directors as shall equal at least one-fifth of the members of the Board. The Class A Stock are entitled to elect all other directors and to vote on all other matters.


Dividends


The Class A and Common stock are entitled to receive dividends on an equal basis, as the board of directors may, from time to time, declare from of funds legally available.


Liquidation 


In the event of the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our Company, the holders of the Class A Stock and the Common Stock are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining after payment of liabilities 


Other Rights


The Class A Stock can be converted to Common Stock at any time at the option of the holder. The Common Stock does not have any conversion rights. Neither of the Class A Stock or the Common Stock has preemptive or other subscription rights. There are no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to the Class A Stock or Common Stock. All outstanding shares of Class A and the Common Stock are fully paid and non-assessable.


Subject to the rules and regulations of NASDAQ, the authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock will be available for future issuance without additional stockholder approval.


The rights, preferences and privileges of holders of Common Stock are subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of the Class A Stock, and any shares of any series of Preferred Stock which we may designate and issue in the future.




Exhibit 4.1











NASDAQ Listing


Our common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC under the symbol “SCHL”.
# EUR-Lex - 11992M/PRO/CC/03 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11992M/PRO/CC/03

**Treaty on European Union - Protocol on the convergence criteria referred to in Article 109 J.of the Treaty establishing the European Community - Article 3 **

*
Official Journal C 191 , 29/07/1992 P. 0085 *

Article 3

The criterion on participation in the Exchange Rate Mechanism of the European Monetary System referred to in the third indent of Article 109j(1) of this Treaty shall mean that a Member State has respected the normal fluctuation margins provided for by the Exchange Rate Mechanism of the European Monetary System without severe tensions for at least the last two years before the examination. In particular, the Member State shall not have devalued its currency's bilateral central rate against any other Member State's currency on its own initiative for the same period.
§ 17.52 Permits—similarity of appearance. Upon receipt of a complete application and unless otherwise indicated in a rule found at §§ 17.40 through 17.48, §§ 17.73 through 17.78, or §§ 17.84 through 17.86, the Director may issue permits for any activity otherwise prohibited with a species designated as endangered or threatened due to its similarity of appearance. Such a permit may authorize a single transaction, a series of transactions, or a number of activities over a specified period of time. ( a ) *Application requirements.* An application for a permit under this section must be submitted to the Director by the person who wishes to engage in the prohibited activity. The permit for activities involving interstate commerce of plants must be obtained by the seller; in the case of wildlife, the permit must be obtained by the buyer. The application must be submitted on an official application form (Form 3-200) provided by the Service, or must contain the general information and certification required by § 13.12(a) of this subchapter. It must include, as an attachment, all of the following information: Documentary evidence, sworn affidavits, or other information to show species identification and the origin of the wildlife or plant in question. This information may be in the form of hunting licenses, hide seals, official stamps, export documents, bills of sales, certification, expert opinion, or other appropriate information.
( b ) *Issuance criteria.* Upon receiving an application completed in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section, the Director will decide whether or not a permit should be issued. In making his decision, the Director shall consider, in addition to the general criteria, in § 13.21(b) of this subchapter, the following factors: ( 1 ) Whether the information submitted by the applicant appears reliable;
( 2 ) Whether the information submitted by the applicant adequately identifies the wildlife or plant in question so as to distinguish it from any Endangered or Threatened wildlife or plant.
( c ) *Permit conditions.* In addition to the general conditions set forth in part 13 of this subchapter, every permit issued under this section shall be subject to the following special conditions: ( 1 ) If indicated in the permit, a special mark, to be specified in the permit, must be applied to the wildlife or plant, and remain for the time designated in the permit;
( 2 ) A copy of the permit or an identification label, which includes the scientific name and the permit number, must accompany the wildlife or plant or its container during the course of any activity subject to these regulations.
( d ) *Duration of permits.* The duration of a permit issued under this section shall be designated on the face of the permit.
[42 FR 32377, June 24, 1977, as amended at 81 FR 51605, Aug. 4, 2016]
Order filed January 26, 2017

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 16

- 00921

- CV

____________ IN THE INTEREST OF C.M.

- L.G. AKA K.M.G, K.D. D. AND K.D.D., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 313th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2015

- 05863J



### ORDER
This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment in a suit in which the termination of the parent

- child relationship is at issue. Both the father, E.D., and the mother, M.D.Y., filed notices of appeal. Appellants’ briefs were due on January 9, 2017. Appellant E.D., represented by appointed counsel, Donald M. Crane, filed his brief on January 9, 2017. Appellant M.D.Y., represented by appointed counsel, William M. Thursland, filed a second request for an extension of time on January 9, 2017, but no brief.On January 11, 2017 , this court denied the motion and ordered appellant

M.D.Y.’s appointed counsel, William M. Thursland, to file a b rief on or before January 23, 2017 . No brief was filed. Accordingly, we issue the following order.
We ORDER the judge of the 313 th District Court to immediately conduct a hearing to determine (1) the reason for the failure to file a brief; (2) whether appe llant
M.D.Y. desires to continue this appeal; and (3) if appellant desires to continue the appeal, a date certain when appellant’s brief will be filed

. The judge shall appoint

new appellate couns el for appellant M.D.Y. if necessary. The judge shall see tha t a record of the hearing is made, shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law, and shall order the trial clerk to forward a record of the hearing and a supplemental
clerk ’ s record containing the findings and conclusions. The transcribed record of t he hearing, and supplemental clerk’s record shall be filed with the cler k of this court on
or before February 10, 2017

.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jamison, and Donovan.
# EUR-Lex - 11957A148 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957A148

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY ( E.A.E.C. - EURATOM ), TITLE THREE - PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INSTITUTIONS, CHAPTER I: THE INSTITUTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY, SECTION IV: THE COURT OF JUSTICE, ARTICLE 148 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 148

SHOULD THE COUNCIL OR THE COMMISSION , IN INFRINGEMENT OF THIS TREATY , FAIL TO ACT , THE MEMBER STATES AND THE OTHER INSTITUTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY MAY BRING AN ACTION BEFORE THE COURT OF JUSTICE TO HAVE THE INFRINGEMENT ESTABLISHED .

THE ACTION SHALL BE ADMISSIBLE ONLY IF THE INSTITUTION CONCERNED HAS FIRST BEEN CALLED UPON TO ACT . IF , WITHIN TWO MONTHS OF BEING SO CALLED UPON , THE INSTITUTION CONCERNED HAS NOT DEFINED ITS POSITION , THE ACTION MAY BE BROUGHT WITHIN A FURTHER PERIOD OF TWO MONTHS .

ANY NATURAL OR LEGAL PERSON MAY , UNDER THE CONDITIONS LAID DOWN IN THE PRECEDING PARAGRAPHS , COMPLAIN TO THE COURT OF JUSTICE THAT AN INSTITUTION OF THE COMMUNITY HAS FAILED TO ADDRESS TO THAT PERSON ANY ACT OTHER THAN A RECOMMENDATION OR AN OPINION .
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection 

Secretary 

Mr. Shawn M. Garvin 

Regional Administrator 

Rachel Carson State Office Building 

P.O. Box 2063 

Harrisburg, PA 17105-2063 

January 4, 2011 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III 

1650 Arch Street (Mail Code: 3RAOO) 

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029 

Dear Mr. Garvin: 

717-787-2814 

Enclosed for your approval is a revision to Pennsylvania's State Implementation Plan 

(SIP) concerning amendments to 25 Pa. Code Chapters 121 and 129 (relating to general 

provisions; and standards for sources). The submittal includes two paper copies and one 

compact disk of a final rulemaking that amends the existing regulation at § 129.51 (relating to 

general) and adds new § 129.52c (relating to control ofVOC emissions from flat wood paneling 

surface coating processes) for control of volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from flat 

wood paneling surface coating processes. 

The requirements of § 129.52c supersede the requirements ofa Reasonably Available 

Control Technology (RACT) permit issued to the owner or operator of a source subject to 

§ 129.52c(a) prior to January 1,2012, under §§ 129.91 -129.95 (relating to st!ltionary sources of 

NOx and VOCs) to control, reduce, or minimize VOC emissions from a flat wood paneling 

surface coating process, except to the extent the RACT permit contains more stringent 

requirements. The final ru1emaking also amends § 121.1 (relating to definitions) to add new 

terms and definitions, and revise existing terms and definitions. 

This SIP revision submission includes the final rulemaking notice published in the 

Pennsylvania Bulletin on December 18, 2010 (40 Pa.B. 7224), documentation of the public 

participation process including proof of public notice, and the Department of Environmental 

Protection's public comment and response document. Should you have questions regarding this 

SIP revision, please contact Joyce E. Epps, Director, Bureau of Air Quality, bye-mail at 

jeepps@state.pa.us or by telephone at 717-787-9702. 

Enclosures 

An Equal Opportunity Employer www.dep.state.pa.us 

Sincerely, 

~V\~ John Hanger 

Secretary 

Printed on Recycled paper@
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Everflow Eastern Partners, L.P. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William A. Siskovic, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ William A. Siskovic
------------------------

William A. Siskovic
Chief Financial Officer
March 26, 2004
H. R. 5161

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four

An Act

To amend the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 to permit the prompt

sharing of timber sale receipts of the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land

Management.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTION REGARDING SHARING OF TIMBER SALE RECEIPTS.

(a) FOREST SERVICE.—Section 13982(b)(1) of the Omnibus

Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (Public Law 103–66; 107 Stat.

681; 16 U.S.C. 500 note) is amended by inserting ‘‘out of any

money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated,’’ before ‘‘for

the benefit of counties’’.

(b) BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT.—Section 13983(b)(1) of

the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (Public Law 103–

66; 107 Stat. 682; 43 U.S.C. 1181f note) is amended by inserting

‘‘, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated,’’

after ‘‘shall make payments’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
**EXHIBIT 99**

 

**LETTER PURSUANT TO TEMPORARY NOTE 3T**

 

Securities and Exchange Commission  450 Fifth Street, N.W.  Washington, DC  20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In accordance with the requirements  of the Securities and Exchange Commission, National Vision, Inc. has received  the following written representation from Arthur Andersen LLP, dated as of  March 21, 2002:

> 
We have audited the consolidated  financial statements of National Vision, Inc. as of and for the year ended  December 29, 2001 and have issued our report thereon dated February 25,  2002.  We represent that this audit was subject to our quality control  system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable  assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance with professional  standards, that there was appropriate continuity of Arthur Andersen personnel  working on the audit, availability of national office consultation, and  availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Arthur Andersen to conduct  the relevant portions of the audit.

NATIONAL VISION, INC.

By:                           /s/   Angus  Morrison                                                     Angus Morrison                                   Chief Financial Officer

Date:                        March 22, 2002
§ 90.815 Records maintenance and definitions. ( a ) *Records maintenance.* All winning bidders qualifying as small businesses, shall maintain at their principal place of business an updated file of ownership, revenue and asset information, including any documents necessary to establish eligibility as a small business, pursuant to § 90.814, and/or a consortium of small businesses. Licensees (and their successors in interest) shall maintain such files for the term of the license.
( b ) *Definitions.* The term *small business* used in this section is defined in § 90.814.
[68 FR 43001, July 21, 2003]
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

COLLINS RAY RUSSELL,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 20

- 30192

D.C. No. 1:09

- cr

- 00068

- SPW

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 17, 2021 * *

Before: FERNANDEZ , BYBEE, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Collins Ray Russell appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 30

- month sentence imposed upon revocation of his supervised

release

. Pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Russell ’s counsel

has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

FEB 24 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 20

- 30192

withdraw as counsel of rec ord. Russell has filed a p ro se supplemental brief . No

answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursu ant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Contrary

to Russell’s argument in his pro se supplemental brief, the 30

- month sentence was

authorized by the applicable statute and the Guidelines. In addition, the sentence is

substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 35 83 ( e ) factors and the totality

of the circumstances, including Russell’s breach of the court’s trust, the need to

protect the public, and the similarity between the original offense and the conduct

underlying the revocation. See Gall v. United States , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007);

United States v. Simtob , 485 F.3d 1058, 1062

- 63 (9th Cir. 2007)

. The record does

not support Russell’s remaining pro se arguments.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED

.