alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 184 (Friday, September 22, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 55441]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8039]



[[Page 55441]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


HQ USAF Scientific Advisory Board; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Department of the Air Force, HQ USAF Scientific Advisory Board, 
DOD.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of the 
forthcoming meeting of the Air Force Scientific Advisory Board. The 
purpose of the meeting is to kickoff the fiscal year 2007 study session 
and welcome new members to the board. Due to restrictions on entering 
the building, anyone planning to attend must contact the POC below by 
October 2, 2006. Attendees will be escorted for the entire portion of 
the meeting.

DATES: 11-12 October 2006.

ADDRESSES: SAF/AQ Conference and Innovation Center, 1560 Wilson Blvd., 
4th Floor, Arlington, VA 22209.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maj Deven Lowman, Air Force Scientific 
Advisory Board Secretariat, 1180 Air Force Pentagon, Rm. 5D982, 
Washington, DC 20330-1180, (703) 697-4811.

Bao-Anh Trinh,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 06-8039 Filed 9-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-05-P
Argued and submitted February 25,

remanded for entry of amended judgment of conviction and for resentencing March 23,

petition for review denied May 24, 1994 (319 Or 150)

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*JEFF LAWRENCE McCLELLAN, *Appellant.*

(91-CR2751FE; CA A76937)

870 P2d 271

Mary M. Reese, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.

Thomas H. Denney, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Leeson, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*129PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted of two counts of criminal mistreatment in the first degree, ORS 163.205, and two counts of assault in the fourth degree, ORS 163.160.

We write only to address defendant’s second assignment of error, in which he argues that the assault convictions should have merged into the convictions for criminal mistreatment. The state concedes error, and we accept the concession.

Remanded for entry of amended judgment of conviction and for resentencing.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of WebMediaBrands Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alan M. Meckler, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Alan M. Meckler


Alan M. Meckler


Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


November 4, 2010
```

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 173 (Thursday, September 7, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 52796]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7528]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Notices

Date and Time: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 at 10 a.m.

Place: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

Status: This meeting will be closed to the public.

 Items to be Discussed:
Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.
Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, 
U.S.C.
Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.
Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a 
particular employee.

Date and Time: Thursday, September 14, 2006 at 10 a.m. Place: 999 E 
Street, NW., Washington, DC (ninth floor).

Status: This meeting will be open to the public.

Items to be Discussed: Correction and Approval of Minutes.
    Advisory Opinion 2006-22: Wallace for Congress by counsel, Andrius 
R. Knotrimas.
Routine Administrative Matters.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 06-7528 Filed 9-5-06; 2:58 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
```
#### § 13.43 Alteration of permits.

Permits shall not be altered, erased, or mutilated, and any permit which has been altered, erased, or mutilated shall immediately become invalid. Unless specifically permitted on the face thereof, no permit shall be copied, nor shall any copy of a permit issued pursuant to this subchapter B be displayed, offered for inspection, or otherwise used for any official purpose for which the permit was issued.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4947

To amend title 28, United States Code, to establish additional requirements

regarding appointment of an independent counsel.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 12, 1994

Mr. BRYANT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 28, United States Code, to establish additional requirements regarding appointment of an independent counsel.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONFLICT OF INTEREST; COMMUNICATION

4 Section 593(b)(2) of title 28, United States Code, is

5 amended—

6 (1) by inserting after the second sentence the

7 following: ‘‘In keeping with the purposes of this

8 chapter, the division of the court shall appoint as

9 independent counsel an individual who is without
2

•HR 4947 IH

1 any real or apparent personal, financial, or political

2 conflict of interest.’’;

3 (2) by adding at the end the following: ‘‘Any

4 communication with the division of the court or any

5 member of such division regarding the qualifications

6 or suitability of an individual to serve as independ7 ent counsel shall be made in writing. No member of

8 such division shall engage in oral communication re9 garding such matters with any individual other than

10 an individual who is a member, or on the staff, of

11 such division or who is being considered for appoint12 ment as an independent counsel. The division of the

13 court shall make any such written communication a

14 part of the proceedings and available for review by

15 the public.

Æ
Exhibit 10.25


On February 1,
2007, Alliance Imaging, Inc. (the “Company”) appointed Eli H. Glovinsky as
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. Mr. Glovinsky’s
base compensation is $275,000 per year and he will be entitled to receive an annual
cash bonus based upon our achievement of certain operating and financial goals,
with an annual target bonus amount equal to 65% of his base salary. The
Compensation Committee of the Company has also granted Mr. Glovinsky stock
options under our 1999 Equity Plan for 235,000 shares of Company common stock
on February 1, 2007.  Such options are non-qualified stock options with an
exercise price of $7.05 (the closing price for our stock on such date). 
Of the 235,000 options granted, 117,500 are time options which vest over a five
year period in equal increments of 20% per year on each February 1st of 2008 through 2012. Of the 235,000 options
granted, 117,500 are performance options which vest on the eighth anniversary
of the grant date if the option holder is still an employee, but the vesting
accelerates if the Company meets the operating performance targets specified in
the option agreements.  If Mr.
Glovinsky’s employment is terminated by the Company without cause or for any
reason that is not solely based on his actions or omissions resulting in a
termination for cause, Mr. Glovinsky will be provided with a severance package
that is equivalent to twelve months of his base salary, his full annual
incentive bonus calculated at 100% of target and continuation of his health and
welfare benefits for twelve months.
Case 16-27442 Doc 9 Filed 08/30/16 Entered 08/31/16 09:47:20 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
#### § 20.104 Seasons, limits, and shooting hours for rails, woodcock, and common (Wilson's) snipe.

This section provides for the annual hunting of certain rails, woodcock, and snipe in the 48 contiguous United States.

[44 FR 7148, Feb. 6, 1979]

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations affecting annual regulatory schedules for this section, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*
§ 501.8 Appeal of initial denial of a request for amendment or correction. ( a ) The initial denial of a request for amendment or correction may be appealed by submitting to the Director the following appeal papers: ( 1 ) A copy of the original request for amendment or correction;
( 2 ) A copy of the initial denial; and
( 3 ) A precise statement of the reasons for the individual's belief that the denial is in error, referring specifically to the criteria contained in § 501.7(c)(1) through (8). The appeal must be signed by the individual. While these papers normally will constitute the entire Record on Appeal, the Director may add additional information, from sources other than the individual, where necessary to facilitate a final determination. Any such additional information added to the record shall promptly be disclosed to the individual to the greatest extent possible, and an opportunity for comment thereon shall be afforded prior to the final determination. Appeals should be submitted to the Director within 90 days after the date of the initial denial.
( b ) The Director shall issue a final determination on appeal within thirty days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal public holidays) from the date on which a completed Record on Appeal (including any additional information deemed necessary) is received. Review, and final determination by the Director, shall be based upon the criteria specified in § 501.7(c)(1) through (8).
( c ) If the appeal is resolved favorably to the individual, the final determination shall specify the amendments or corrections to be made. Copies of the final determination shall be transmitted promptly to the individual and to the Privacy Officer. The Privacy Officer shall make the requested amendment or correction and advise the individual in writing of such action.
( d ) If the appeal is denied, the final determination shall state, with particularity, the reasons for denial, including a citation to an appropriate section of the Act and of these Rules. The final determination shall be forwarded promptly to the individual, together with a notice which shall inform the individual of his or her right to submit to the Privacy Officer, for inclusion in the record, a concise statement of grounds for disagreement with the final determination. Receipt of any such statement shall be acknowledged by the Privacy Officer, and all subsequent and prior users of the record shall be provided copies of the statement. The notice shall also inform the individual of his or her right, under 5 U.S.C. 552a(g)(1), to obtain judicial review of the final determination.
[40 FR 49276, Oct. 21, 1975, as amended at 41 FR 5, Jan. 2, 1976]
#### §§ 550.161-550.169 [Reserved]
Exhibit 32.1











SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION





In connection with the Quarterly Report of EnXnet, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the undersigned Ryan Corley, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Stephen Hoelscher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge that:





(a) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(b) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.








Date: February 15, 2011
By:
/s/ Ryan CorleyRyan CorleyChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)





Date: February 15, 2011
By:
/s/ Stephen HoelscherStephen HoelscherChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
When to Issue a Blue Alert

Blue Alerts may be issued when1

■ a request has been made by a law enforcement 

agency having primary jurisdiction over the 

incident in question, and 

■ one of the following three sets of threshold criteria 

have been met:

1. Death or serious injury of a law enforcement 

officer in the line of duty

■ The agency confirms that a law enforcement 

officer has been

h killed;

h seriously injured; or

h attacked and with indications of death 

or serious injury.

■ Any suspect involved has not been 

apprehended.

■ There is sufficient descriptive information 

of the suspect, including any vehicle 

and license tag information.

2. Threat to cause death or serious injury 

to a law enforcement officer

■ The agency confirms that the threat 

is imminent and credible.

■ At the time of receipt of the threat, any suspect 

involved is wanted by a law enforcement agency.

■ Any suspect involved has not been apprehended.

■ There is sufficient descriptive information of 

the suspect, including any vehicle and license 

tag information.

3. Law enforcement officer missing 

in connection with official duties

■ The agency concludes that the law enforcement 

officer is missing in connection with the officer’s 

official duties.

■ There is an indication of serious injury to

or death of the law enforcement officer.

■ Any suspect involved has not 

been apprehended.

■ There is sufficient descriptive information of 

the suspect, including any relevant vehicle and 

license tag information. 1. The voluntary guidelines for issuing a Blue Alert are established 

by statute at 42 U.S.C. §§ 14165b(b)(2)(D)-(E).

For more information, go to www.cops.usdoj.gov/bluealert 

or email BlueAlert@usdoj.gov.
- 
      - ** Home
      - ** About Us
      - ** Archives
      - ** Events
      - ** Publications

### Contact Us

To provide feedback on the Community Policing Dispatch, e-mail the editorial board at CPDispatch@usdoj.gov.

To obtain details on COPS Office programs, publications, and resources, contact the COPS Office Response Center at 800-421-6770 or AskCopsRC@usdoj.gov

**U.S. Department of Justice**        Office of Community Oriented Policing Services 
www.cops.usdoj.gov

            - Home
            - About Us
            - Archives
            - Events
            - Publications
            - Contact Us

### **New COPS Office Resources on Women in Policing**

March 2021 | Volume 14 | Issue 3

It has been more than 100 years since Alice Stebbin Wells became the first woman to be known as a “police woman” when she joined the Los Angeles Police (California) Department in 1910. In 1985, Penny Harrington of the Portland (Oregon) Police Department became the first female Chief of Police, and today it is estimated that roughly 12.7 percent of officers are women. In recognition of Women’s History Month, the COPS Office is pleased to share perspectives from two of the most influential female law enforcements executives of our era.

**Kathleen O’Toole** has served as Chief of the Seattle (Washington) Police Department; the first female Commissioner of the Boston (Massachusetts) Police Department; Lieutenant Colonel of the Massachusetts State Police; Secretary of the Executive Office of Public Safety and Security for the State of Massachusetts; and Chief Inspector of the Garda Inspectorate, which oversees the efficient operation of Ireland’s National Police Service. Chief O’Toole (ret.) joins *The Beat* podcast series to share her experiences and insight.

**Valerie Cunningham** is the Deputy Chief of the Indianapolis (Indiana) Police Department and is a Past President of the National Association of Women in Law Enforcement. Deputy Chief Cunningham is featured in a newly released episode of the COPS Office’s video series, *What’s New In Blue*, and offers a view into the world of female officers that is both interesting and informative.

Tweet

**Subscribe to Email Updates**
To sign up for monthly updates or to access your subscriber preferences, please enter your email address in the Subscribe box.

The Community Policing Dispatch is the e-newsletter of the COPS Office. 

The Community Policing Dispatch is the e-newsletter of the COPS Office. 

**Explore**
            - Home
            - About Us
            - Archives
            - Events
            - Publications
            - Contact Us

**
Connect With Us 
**
Want to stay connected with the COPS office?             Follow us on social media!
            - 
            - 
            - 
- 
- 
- 

             FOIA 

             No FEAR Act 

             Open Government 

             Plain Writing 

             USA.gov 

             Legal Policies and Disclaimers 

             Language Access Plan 

             DOJ Privacy Policy
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FILES
AS PART OF THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      13,259,000
<SECURITIES>                                 1,431,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,992,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            25,557,000
<PP&E>                                      16,895,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (10,797,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              58,684,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       39,657,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,715,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   (134,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,081,000
<SALES>                                    105,588,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           124,324,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             6,825,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,796,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (27,357,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (4,442,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (22,915,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                             (2,581,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (25,496,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.88)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.88)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED BY SECTION
         906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John "JT"  Thatch,  as Chief  Executive  Officer and acting  Chief  Financial
Officer of Dtomi, Inc. (the "Company")  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to my
knowledge:

(1) the  accompanying  Form 10-Q report for the period  ending March 31, 2003 as
filed with the U.S.  Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report")  fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 20, 2003              /s/ John "JT" Thatch
                                    ----------------------------------
                                    John "JT" Thatch, CEO/acting CFO
# EUR-Lex - 11979HN08/01 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11979HN08/01

**DOCUMENTS CONCERNING THE ACCESSION OF THE HELLENIC REPUBLIC TO THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, ACT CONCERNING THE CONDITIONS OF ACCESSION OF THE HELLENIC REPUBLIC AND THE ADJUSTMENTS TO THE TREATIES, ANNEX VIII LIST REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 128 OF THE ACT OF ACCESSION, I. TRANSPORT **

*
Official Journal L 291 , 19/11/1979 P. 0163 *

+++++

1 . COUNCIL REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 1017/68 OF 19 JULY 1968 ( OJ NO L 175 , 23 . 7 . 1968 , P . 1 ) ,

AS AMENDED BY THE ACT OF ACCESSION 1972 ( OJ NO L 73 , 27 . 3 . 1972 , P . 14 ) .

IN THE CASE OF GREECE , THE PROHIBITION LAID DOWN IN ARTICLE 2 OF THIS REGULATION WILL APPLY AS FROM 1 JULY 1981 TO THE AGREEMENTS , DECISIONS AND CONCERTED PRACTICES EXISTING AT THE TIME OF ACCESSION AND WHICH , AS A RESULT OF ACCESSION , FALL WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE PROHIBITION .

2 . COUNCIL REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 543/69 OF 25 MARCH 1969 ( OJ NO L 77 , 29 . 3 . 1969 , P . 49 ) ,

AS AMENDED BY :

- REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 514/72 OF 28 FEBRUARY 1972 ( OJ NO L 67 , 20 . 3 . 1972 , P . 1 ) ,

- REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 515/72 OF 28 FEBRUARY 1972 ( OJ NO L 67 , 20 . 3 . 1972 , P . 11 ) ,

- REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 2827/77 OF 12 DECEMBER 1977 ( OJ NO L 334 , 24 . 12 . 1977 , P . 1 ) ,

- REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 2829/77 OF 12 DECEMBER 1977 ( OJ NO L 334 , 24 . 12 . 1977 , P . 11 ) .

APPLICATION OF THIS REGULATION TO NATIONAL TRANSPORT OPERATIONS IN GREECE IS DEFERRED UNTIL 1 JANUARY 1984 .

3 . COUNCIL REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 1191/69 OF 26 JUNE 1969 ( OJ NO L 156 , 28 . 6 . 1969 , P . 1 ) ,

AS AMENDED BY THE ACT OF ACCESSION 1972 ( OJ NO L 73 , 27 . 3 . 1972 , P . 14 )

THE RIGHT TO COMPENSATION REFERRED TO IN THE SECOND SUBPARAGRAPH OF ARTICLE 6 ( 3 ) AND IN THE FIRST SUBPARAGRAPH OF ARTICLE 9 ( 2 ) SHALL TAKE EFFECT IN GREECE FROM 1 JULY 1982 .

4 . COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 76/914/EEC OF 16 DECEMBER 1976 ( OJ NO L 357 , 29 . 12 . 1976 , P . 36 ) .

THE HELLENIC REPUBLIC MAY DEFER IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS DIRECTIVE FOR NATIONAL TRANSPORT OPERATIONS IN GREECE UNTIL 1 JANUARY 1984 .

5 . COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 77/143/EEC OF 29 DECEMBER 1976 ( OJ NO L 47 , 18 . 2 . 1977 , P . 47 ) .

THE HELLENIC REPUBLIC MAY DEFER IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS DIRECTIVE UNTIL 1 JANUARY 1983 IN THE CASE OF INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORT BETWEEN GREECE AND THE PRESENT MEMBER STATES OF THE COMMUNITY AND UNTIL 1 JANUARY 1985 IN THE CASE OF NATIONAL TRANSPORT OPERATIONS IN GREECE .

ONCE THE DIRECTIVE IS IMPLEMENTED IN RESPECT OF INTRA-COMMUNITY TRAFFIC , THE HELLENIC REPUBLIC WILL PROVIDE EVERY GUARANTEE THAT THE MOTOR VEHICLES AND THEIR TRAILERS REFERRED TO IN THAT DIRECTIVE WHICH ARE REGISTERED IN GREECE AND WHICH ARE ENGAGED IN THE SAME FORM OF TRAFFIC HAVE IN FACT UNDERGONE THE ROADWORTHINESS TEST .