alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 The HONORABLE RICHARD G. KOPF, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 99-3797

___________ Theresa L. Hermes, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. State of Nebraska, acting through the * Department of Public Institutions, * [UNPUBLISHED] Western Nebraska Veterans & Home, * * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: July 31, 2000 Filed: August 3, 2000

___________ Before BEAM, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.
Theresa L. Hermes commenced this action alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12112, et seq ., by the State of Nebraska Department of Public Institutions. The district court 1 dismissed the action, and denied Hermes’s motion for a new trial, based upon this court’s decision that the States and their instrumentalities are entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity from actions under-2-

Title II of the ADA. See Alsbrook v. City of Maumelle , 184 F.3d 999, 1010 (8th Cir. 1999) (en banc), cert. dismissed , 120 S. Ct. 1265 (2000)

. Hermes appeals. Concluding the district court properly applied our controlling decision in Alsbrook , and did not abuse its discretion in denying Hermes’s motion for a new trial, we affirm. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### § 18.109 General technical requirements.

ISM equipment shall be designed and constructed in accordance with good engineering practice with sufficient shielding and filtering to provide adequate suppression of emissions on frequencies outside the frequency bands specified in § 18.301.
Case 16-27435 Doc 1 Filed 08/26/16 Entered 08/26/16 12:07:12 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 10
Case 16-27435 Doc 1 Filed 08/26/16 Entered 08/26/16 12:07:12 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 10
Case 16-27435 Doc 1 Filed 08/26/16 Entered 08/26/16 12:07:12 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 10
Case 16-27435 Doc 1 Filed 08/26/16 Entered 08/26/16 12:07:12 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 10
Case 16-27435 Doc 1 Filed 08/26/16 Entered 08/26/16 12:07:12 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 10
Case 16-27435 Doc 1 Filed 08/26/16 Entered 08/26/16 12:07:12 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 10
Case 16-27435 Doc 1 Filed 08/26/16 Entered 08/26/16 12:07:12 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 10
Case 16-27435 Doc 1 Filed 08/26/16 Entered 08/26/16 12:07:12 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 10
Case 16-27435 Doc 1 Filed 08/26/16 Entered 08/26/16 12:07:12 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 10
Case 16-27435 Doc 1 Filed 08/26/16 Entered 08/26/16 12:07:12 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 10
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0951The Evolution and Growth of Civilian Oversight: Key Principles and Practices for Effectiveness and SustainabilityThe wave of high-profile incidents in 2020 between police and community members has prompted widespread calls for greater community oversight of law enforcement agencies. This is an executive summary of Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement: Report on the State of the Field and Effective Oversight Practices, a white paper by the National Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement (NACOLE) that combines survey data, case studies of oversight bodies nationwide, and a literature review to outline the history of civilian oversight and its spread; define three standard oversight models and discuss their implementation; propose 13 principles for effective oversight; and provide recommendations for each within an effective practices framework.By Michael Vitoroulis, Cameron McEllhiney, Liana PerezCategories: Data and AnalysisLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0951Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFBook • Jul 2021Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 01:57 (UTC-5) in 0.89 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
2

cc: Hon. Connie J. Steinheimer, District Judge John Steven Olausen Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0900Ten Essential Actions to Improve School Safety Quick Reference GuideThe COPS Office School Safety Working Group, which is composed of representatives from eight national law enforcement organizations, has identified 10 essential actions that can be taken by schools, school districts, and law enforcement agencies to help prevent critical incidents involving the loss of life or injuries in our nation's schools and to respond rapidly and effectively when incidents do occur. These actions are applicable to school shootings as well as to other areas of school safety, including natural disasters and traumatic events such as student suicide. Adopting policies and practices based on these essential actions (condensed from the recommendations in the accompanying publication) can help make school communities safer and save lives. The full publication can be found at https://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=COPS-W0891.By School Safety Working GroupCategories: School and Campus SafetyLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0900Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Aug 2020Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 02:37 (UTC-5) in 0.23 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
null

2014-10-10

70.16701

eng - Argued: 2014-10-10. Docket number: 14-5053
EXHIBIT 31.1

             CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRESIDENT

I, Michael Timms, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Australian Forest
Industries;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
      being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
      quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
      evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

      a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
      controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      controls; and


                                       8
<PAGE>

6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: June 21, 2006

/s/ Michael Timms
----------------------------------
Name: Michael Timms
Title: Chief Executive Officer and President


                                       9
# EUR-Lex - 11992M/PRO/SEBC/28 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11992M/PRO/SEBC/28

**Treaty on European Union - Protocol on the statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank - Chapter VI: Financial provisions of the ESCB - Article 28: Capital of the ECB **

*
Official Journal C 191 , 29/07/1992 P. 0074 *

Article 28

Capital of the ECB

28.1. The capital of the ECB, which shall become operational upon its establishment, shall be ECU 5 000 million. The capital may be increased by such amounts as may be decided by the Governing Council acting by the qualified majority provided for in Article 10.3, within the limits and under the conditions set by the Council under the procedure laid down in Article 42.

28.2. The national central banks shall be the sole subscribers to and holders of the capital of the ECB. The subscription of capital shall be according to the key established in accordance with Article 29.

28.3. The Governing Council, acting by the qualified majority provided for in Article 10.3, shall determine the extent to which and the form in which the capital shall be paid up.

28.4. Subject to Article 28.5, the shares of the national central banks in the subscribed capital of the ECB may not be transferred, pledged or attached.

28.5. If the key referred to in Article 29 is adjusted, the national central banks shall transfer among themselves capital shares to the extent necessary to ensure that the distribution of capital shares corresponds to the adjusted key. The Governing Council shall determine the terms and conditions of such transfers.
§ 600.1106 Longline catcher processor subsector Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands (BSAI) non-pollock groundfish species fee payment and collection system. ( a ) *Purpose.* As authorized by Public Law 108 447, this section's purpose is to: ( 1 ) In accordance with § 600.1012, establish: ( i ) The borrower's obligation to repay a reduction loan, and
( ii ) The loan's principal amount, interest rate, and repayment term; and
( 2 ) In accordance with §§ 600.1013 through 600.1016, implement an industry fee system for the reduction fishery.
( b ) *Definitions.* Unless otherwise defined in this section, the terms defined in § 600.1000 and § 600.1105 expressly apply to this section. In addition, the following definition applies to this section: *Reduction fishery* means the longline catcher processor subsector of the BSAI non-pollock groundfish fishery that § 679.2 of this chapter defined as groundfish area/species endorsements.
( c ) *Reduction loan amount.* The reduction loan's original principal amount is $35,000,000.
( d ) *Interest accrual from inception.* Interest began accruing on the reduction loan from May 29, 2007, the date on which NMFS disbursed such loan.
( e ) *Interest rate.* The reduction loan's interest rate shall be the applicable rate which the U.S. Treasury determines at the end of fiscal year 2007 plus 2 percent.
( f ) *Repayment term.* For the purpose of determining fee rates, the reduction loan's repayment term is 30 years from May 29, 2007, but fees shall continue indefinitely for as long as necessary to fully repay the loan.
( g ) *Reduction loan repayment.* ( 1 ) The borrower shall, in accordance with § 600.1012, repay the reduction loan;
( 2 ) For the purpose of the fee collection, deposit, disbursement, and accounting requirements of this subpart, subsector members are deemed to be both the fish buyer and fish seller. In this case, all requirements and penalties of § 600.1013 that are applicable to both a fish seller and a fish buyer shall equally apply to parties performing both functions;
( 3 ) Subsector members in the reduction fishery shall pay and collect the fee amount in accordance with § 600.1105;
( 4 ) Subsector members in the reduction fishery shall, in accordance with § 600.1014, deposit and disburse, as well as keep records for and submit reports about, the fees applicable to such fishery; except the requirements specified under paragraph (c) of this section concerning the deposit principal disbursement shall be made to NMFS no later than fifteen (15) calendar days following the end of each calendar month; and the requirements specified under paragraph (e) of this section concerning annual reports which shall be submitted to NMFS by February 1 of each calendar year; and
( 5 ) The reduction loan is, in all other respects, subject to the provisions of §§ 600.1012 through 600.1017.
[72 FR 54222, Sept. 24, 2007]
Your logoHERE

Title here

Your logoHERE

This project was supported by cooperative agreement XXXX-XX-XX-XXXX awarded by the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions contained herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. References to specific agencies, companies, products, or services should not be considered an endorsement by the author(s) or the U.S. Department of Justice. Rather, the references are illustrations to supplement discussion of the issues. The Internet references cited in this publication were valid as of the date of publication. Given that URLs and websites are in constant flux, neither the author(s) nor the COPS Office can vouch for their current validity.  Published [YEAR] 

Your logoHERE

Thank You

# image2.jpg

# image1.png
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Yarek Bartosz, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Parallax Entertaiment Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated this 12th day of August, 2003.



| | /s/ Yarek Bartosz
Yarek Bartosz
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
§ 29.21-8 Electric power transmission line rights-of-way. By accepting a right-of-way for a power transmission line, the applicant thereby agrees and consents to comply with and be bound by the following terms and conditions, except those which the Secretary may waive in a particular case, in addition to those specified in § 29.21-4(b). ( a ) To protect in a workmanlike manner, at crossings and at places in proximity to his transmission lines on the right-of-way authorized, in accordance with the rules prescribed in the National Electric Safety Code, all Government and other telephone, telegraph and power transmission lines from contact and all highways and railroads from obstruction and to maintain his transmission lines in such manner as not to menace life or property.
( b ) Neither the privilege nor the right to occupy or use the lands for the purpose authorized shall relieve him of any legal liability for causing inductive or conductive interference between any project transmission line or other project works constructed, operated, or maintained by him on the servient lands, and any radio installation, telephone line, or other communication facilities now or hereafter constructed and operated by the United States or any agency thereof.
[42 FR 43919, Aug. 31, 1977, as amended at 48 FR 31655, July 11, 1983]
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-3013

JAIME ROSADO,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE,

Respondent.

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in

DA0432890528-P-1.

ON MOTION

Before MAYER, SCHALL, and MOORE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

Jaime Rosado submits a Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment

Rights Act (USERRA) notification form, moves to reinstate his petition for review, and

requests a status update on his case.

Rosado's petition was dismissed on November 10, 2008 because he had not

paid the filing fee or submitted a Fed. Cir. R. 15(c) statement concerning discrimination.

On January 12, 2009, Rosado submitted a USERRA notification form claiming that his

case before the Merit Systems Protection Board involved USERRA claims and thus was

exempt from paying the filing fee. On January 21, 2009, Rosado submitted the Rule

15(c) form and filed a motion seeking reinstatement of his case.
In his motion to reinstate, Rosado requests that the court proceed with his case

only if his case "qualiffies] under the USERRA" for a waiver of the filing fee. Rosado

states that he does not want to pay the docketing fee and that if his case does not meet

these requirements, it can be dismissed.

The court notes that the Board decision under review does not indicate that

Rosado raised any USERRA claims. Thus, because Rosado does not qualify for a

waiver of the filing fee pursuant to USERRA and has not paid the filing fee, the motion

to reinstate is denied.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion to reinstate is denied.

Each side shall bear its own costs.

FOR THE COURT

APR 3 2009

/s/ Jan Horbalv

Jan Horbaly

Clerk	 Rua

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

cc:	Jaime Rosado

Robert C. Bigler, Esq.

s17

APR 0 3 2009

Mu iiükistiLY

CLERK

Date

2009-3013	 2