alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Request of House of Representatives,

No. 4600.

#### Opinion of the Justices.

Submitted July 6, 1957.

Answer returned July 9, 1957.

The following answer was returned:

*To the House of Representatives:*

*545The undersigned Justices of the Supreme Court submit the following reply to your request for advice upon the question of whether the proposed amendment to RSA 39:2 as contained in Senate Bill No. 149 appears to be in conflict with the Constitution.

The specific issue upon which advice is sought, as we understand it, can be stated as follows: If RSA 39:2 were amended as proposed, when an article in a town warrant called for the appropriation of a specific sum of money for a specific purpose and the voters acting thereunder voted to raise and appropriate a larger sum than that called for in the article would the statute permitting such action violate the constitutional rights of taxpayers? The question assumes that in those towns where the Municipal Budget Law (RSA ch. 32) is in force the total amount appropriated at the meeting would not exceed the limitations therein provided. RSA 32:8, 9.

The answer to this inquiry is in the negative, that is, a town could be authorized to so vote without violating the Constitution or the constitutional rights of any taxpayer.

Towns have only such powers as are granted to them by the State. *Leavitt*v. *North Hampton,*98 N. H. 193, 197. They are bound by the limits imposed upon them by the Legislature from whom they derive their powers. *Moulton*v. *Beals,*98 N. H. 461, 466; *State v. Goffstown, 100*N. H. 131, 133.

RSA 31:4 provides that “Towns may at any legal meeting grant and vote such sums of money as they judge necessary for the following purposes.” We are assuming in our answer that the object of the proposed appropriation is one that is duly authorized and that other applicable statutory provisions have been complied with.

RSA 39:2 provides that “The subject matter of all business to be acted upon at the town meeting shall be distinctly stated in the warrant, and nothing done at any meeting . . . shall be valid unless the subject thereof is so stated.” It has long been the law of this state that the purpose of this requirement “is to inform the inhabitants of the business upon which they are called to act in the meeting, — ‘to bring before the town substantially and intelligently the subject with which it has to deal.’ ” *Sawyer*v. *Railroad,*62 N. H. 135, 158; *Tucker*v. *Aiken,*7 N. H. 113, 125, 126. If the proposed bill were enacted the amendment itself would inform interested persons that the meeting might lawfully appropriate a sum larger than that specified by the warrant. It is our *546opinion that it may be provided by statute that the specific sum of money called for by the warrant can be increased-by the vote of the town without violating the Constitution or the constitutional rights of taxpayers.

Frank R. Kenison,

Laurence I. Duncan,

Amos N. Blandin, Jr.,

Edward J. Lampron,

Stephen M. 'Wheeler.

July 9, 1957.

*State Tax Commission*furnished a memorandum.

*Edward J. Bennett,*Senator, Fifth District, also furnished a memorandum.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Patientoutcomes research [electronic resource]: examining the effectiveness of nursingpractice.**
 
 
Welcome: Patient Outcomes Research Conference
 
OutcomesResearch: Implications for the Effectiveness of Nursing Practice
 
Outcomes Research:Integrating Nursing Practice into the World View
 
 
*Panel 1 - Clinical Conditions andInterventions: Their Relationship to Outcomes
 
Outcomes That Reflect ClinicalPractice
 
Measuring the Quality ofNursing Surveillance Activities for Five Diseases Before and AfterImplementation of the DRG-based Prospective Payment System
 
A Research Agenda for Outcomes Research
 
Defining and ClassifyingNursing Interventions
 
Conditions, Interventions, andOutcomes: A Quantitative Analysis of Nursing Research
 
 
*Panel 2 - Patient and Contextual FactorsInfluencing Patient Outcomes
 
Family Outcomes:Family-Practitioner Interface
 
Family Outcomes:Conceptual and Methodological Issues
 
Nursing Practice Models: Research on PatientOutcomes
 
Individual/Group/Environmental:Interactions and Clinical Practice Interface
 
 
*Panel 3 - Methods and Measurement inPatient Outcomes Research
 
Measures and Instruments
 
Methods and Measurementin Patient Outcomes Research: Universal Issues
 
Knowledge,Decisions, and the Timing of Policy � Development: Creating a StrategicFramework for Science Policy
 
Analysis Issues in OutcomesResearch
 
 
*Panel 4 - Data Sources and Data Basesfor Examining the Influence of Nursing Practice on Patient Outcomes
 
National and RegionalData Bases: The Big Picture
 
Patient-Linked DataBases: Implications for a Nursing Outcomes Research Agenda
 
NursingEffectiveness Research Using Existing Data Bases
 
Strategies forBuilding Nursing Data Bases for Effectiveness Research
 
 
SuDoc Number:HE 20.3002: OU 8/2
Item Number:0507 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000880619
 
June 29, 2018****
#### § 260.22 Order of inspection service.

Inspection service shall be performed, insofar as practicable, in the order in which applications therefor are made except that precedence may be given to any such applications which are made by the United States (including, but not being limited to, any instrumentality or agency thereof) and to any application for an appeal inspection.
Editorial Note on Part 622
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 622 appear at 79 FR 57837, Sept. 26, 2014 and at 81 FR 32253, May 23, 2016.

§ 622.273 Conservation measures for protected species. ( a ) *Atlantic dolphin and wahoo pelagic longliners.* The owner or operator of a vessel for which a commercial permit for Atlantic dolphin and wahoo has been issued, as required under § 622.270(a)(1), and that has on board a pelagic longline must post inside the wheelhouse the sea turtle handling and release guidelines provided by NMFS. Such owner or operator must also comply with the sea turtle bycatch mitigation measures, including gear requirements and sea turtle handling requirements, as specified in § 635.21(c)(5)(i) and (ii) of this chapter, respectively. For the purpose of this paragraph, a vessel is considered to have pelagic longline gear on board when a power-operated longline hauler, a mainline, floats capable of supporting the mainline, and leaders (gangions) with hooks are on board. Removal of any one of these elements constitutes removal of pelagic longline gear.
( b ) [Reserved]
#### § 600.525 Applicability of subpart F to Canadian Albacore Fishing Vessels off the West Coast.

Fishing by vessels of Canada under the 1981 Treaty Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Canada on Pacific Coast Albacore Tuna Vessels and Port Privileges is regulated only under this section and § 600.530 of this subpart F, and is exempt from any other requirements of this subpart F. Regulations governing fishing by U.S. vessels in waters under the fisheries jurisdiction of the Canada more than 12 nautical miles from the baseline from which the territorial sea is measured are found at §§ 300.170-300.176 of chapter II of this title.

[69 FR 31535, June 4, 2004]
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000866878
<NAME>                        ICON Cash Flow Partners, L.P., Series C


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         2,186,149
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,310,140
<ALLOWANCES>                                     182,936
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS> *                                     0
<PP&E>                                                 0
<DEPRECIATION>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,316,353
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> **                               0
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,861,494
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,316,353
<SALES>                                          532,398
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 631,332
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (352,089)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 4,888
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        0
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     978,533
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       4.88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       4.88
<FN>
*    The  Partnership  has  an  unclassified  balance  sheet  in  its  financial
     statements due to the nature of its industry.  A value of "0" was used for
     current assets and liabilities.

**   The  Partnership  has  an  unclassified  balance  sheet  in  its  financial
     statements due to the nature of its industry.  A value of "0" was used for
     current assets and liabilities.
</FN>




</TABLE>
U.S. Department of Justice

Office of Community Oriented Policing Services

 Fact Sheet cops.usdoj.gov

 

2023 COPS Office Preparing for Active Shooter 

Situations (PASS) Training Program Awards

The Office of Community Oriented Policing Services 

(COPS Office) Preparing for Active Shooter Situations 

(PASS) Training Program is designed to increase public 

and law enforcement safety nationwide by training first 

responders—including law enforcement, fire, emergency 

medical services (EMS), dispatchers, medical personnel, 

facility security, emergency management, and any other 

professionals who may reasonably be key to a successful 

integrated response—to handle an active shooter or other 

violent threat. Training provided under the 2023 PASS 

program will advance the goal of the 2016 Protecting 

Our Lives by Initiating COPS Expansion (POLICE) Act 

in offering “scenario-based, integrated response courses 

designed to counter active shooter threats or acts of terrorism 

against individuals or facilities.”1

1. 34 U.S.C. § 10381(b)(17).

The awarded project is located on the COPS Office website 

at https://cops.usdoj.gov/programdocuments.

Funding Provisions

In FY 2023, the COPS Office awarded $10.9 million under 

the PASS Training Program. Funding was awarded with the 

following provisions:

	PASS provides funds to training providers who can offer 

integrated, scenario-based response courses as described 

in the 2016 POLICE Act.

	The PASS-funded provider has substantial experience 

with providing and tailoring cross-disciplinary active 

shooter training to law enforcement and other first 

responders nationally.

	PASS funding may be used to provide supplemental 

resources to help officers maintain these vital but 

perishable skills—including scenario libraries and 

e-learning modules—and to enhance agency skills in 

tactical medicine and managing exposure to trauma.

 Contact the COPS Office

For more information about the COPS Office Preparing for Active Shooter Situations program, please contact the COPS Office 

Response Center at AskCOPSRC@usdoj.gov or 800-421-6770 or visit the COPS Office website at https://cops.usdoj.gov.

September 2023
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Communication Disorders Review Committee.                    

*Date:*                         October 11-12, 2006.                    

*Time:*                         October 11, 2006, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Wyndham Washington, DC, 1400 M Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005.                    

*Time:*                         October 12, 2006, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Wyndham Washington, DC, 1400 M Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Sheo Singh, Scientific Review Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, Executive Plaza South, Room 400C, 6120 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-8683.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.173, Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communicative Disorders, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 24, 2006.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 06-7339 Filed 8-30-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### § 87.239 Supplemental eligibility.

Each applicant for a multicom may be required to demonstrate why such a station is necessary, based on the scope of service defined above.

[63 FR 68957, Dec. 14, 1998]
#### § 600.605 General policy.

It is the policy of the Secretary that preemption proceedings will be conducted expeditiously. The administrative law judge and counsel or other representative for each party are encouraged to make every effort at each stage of the proceedings to avoid delay.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5074 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5074

To grant authority to Guam to give a preference, in awarding contracts, 
to persons employing citizens, nationals, or permanent resident aliens 
                         of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 22, 1994

Mr. Underwood introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To grant authority to Guam to give a preference, in awarding contracts, 
to persons employing citizens, nationals, or permanent resident aliens 
                         of the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Guam Labor Preference Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY FOR CONTRACT PREFERENCE FOR PERSONS EMPLOYING 
              CITIZENS, NATIONALS, OR PERMANENT RESIDENT ALIENS OF THE 
              UNITED STATES.

    The Organic Act of Guam (48 U.S.C. 1421 et seq.) is amended by 
adding at the end the following new section:
    ``Sec. 36. As the laws of Guam may direct, the government of Guam 
may give a preference, in the award of a contract, to persons that 
demonstrate that not less than a specified percentage of the 
individuals employed in Guam by the persons are citizens or nationals 
of the United States or are aliens lawfully admitted to the United 
States for permanent residence.''.

                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 27, 2020 s0520

Order 

Clerk

May 27, 2020

160562

RAYSHAWN PACE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

and

GET WELL MEDICAL TRANSPORT

COMPANY,

Intervening Plaintiff-Appellant,

and

AFFILIATED DIAGNOSTICS OF OAKLAND,

LLC,

Intervening Plaintiff,

v SC: 160562

COA: 339777

Wayne CC: 15-006548-NI

JOHN DOE, ANGELA NOEL, and HOME- OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendants,

and

AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 8, 2019 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

CAVANAGH, J., did not participate due to her prior relationship with Garan Lucow 

Miller, P.C.
#### § 261.101 Standard description.

A U.S. Standard for Grades authorized under this part is a standard for a fish or fishery product that has been developed and adopted by the voluntary seafood inspection program pursuant to the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1621 *et seq.*) and other authorities delegated to the U.S. Department of Commerce.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1615/2005

of 30 September 2005         

fixing the minimum selling price for skimmed-milk powder for the 26th individual invitation to tender issued under the standing invitation to tender referred to in Regulation (EC) No 214/2001

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular Article 10(c) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 26th individual invitation to tender pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 214/2001, in respect of which the time limit for the submission of tenders expired on 27 September 2005, the minimum selling price for skimmed milk is fixed at 188,00 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 October 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 September 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

(2)OJ L 37, 7.2.2001, p. 100. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2250/2004 (OJ L 381, 28.12.2004, p. 25).

----
EXHIBIT 32.1


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Chandler (U.S.A.), Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
W. Brent LaGere, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Mark C. Hart,
as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                          /s/ W. Brent LaGere
                                          ------------------------------------
                                          W. Brent LaGere
                                          Chief Executive Officer
                                          November 8, 2005



                                          /s/ Mark C. Hart
                                          ------------------------------------
                                          Mark C. Hart
                                          Chief Financial Officer
                                          November 8, 2005


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Chandler (U.S.A.), Inc. and will be retained by Chandler (U.S.A.),
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.