alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUPREME COURT.

#### William S. Toole and Benjamin D. Lefevre agt. Domingo de Goicouria.

An order of *arrest*cannot be maintained *in an action on*contract, upon allegations that defendant is about removing from the state with intent to defraud his creditors, and that he fraudulently withholds and conceals his property with a like intent.

A motion to vacate an order of arrest may be made after an iuquest has been taken against defendant, and is in conformity with the requirement of the *Code,—that the motion be made at any time before*judgment—fo*r*the judgment is not perfect until entered in the judgment book.” *{Per*Ingraham, J"., *at special term*)*

*General*Term, *First*District, January, 1868.

*Before*Barnard, Ingraham *and*Sutherland, *Justices.*

Motion to vocate an order of arrest.

John B. Stevens *and*A. R. Dyett, *for respondents.*

F. R. Coudert, *for appellant.*

*[Cited Brodsky*agt. *Ihms, 25 How.*471.)

This was an action brought to recover the sum of $2,613.07 of the defendant, as acceptor of a bill of exchange for that amount.

After the action had been at issue for some time, the plaintiff obtained an order of arrest against the defendant on the ground that he was about to leave the country, and that he had concealed his property with intent to defraud his creditors ; and subsequently took an inquest because an affidavit of merits had not been filed and served.

After the- inquest had been taken and while further proceedings on the part of plaintiff were stayed pending a motion to open the same—the defendant moved to vacate the order of arrest upon the plaintiff’s affidavits.

The motion was argued before Judge Ingraham, on the 20th November, 1867, and the plaintiff urged the preliminary *128objection that the motion was made *after judgment,*an inquest having been taken;—:the justice decided the objection insufficient—but denied the motion in the following language:

*Per*Ingraham, *J.*

“The judgment is not perfect until “ entered in the judgment book.”

“ Upon the merits, I think the sufficiency of the affidavits “ is to be doubted, but as there are some decisions holding “them to be sufficient, I shall deny this motion, leaving the “ defendant to his appeal to the general term.”

An order was entered denying the motion; the defendant appealed to the general term; the appeal was argued at the January term, 1868,' before Barnard, Ingraham and Sutherland, Justices, and the order of Judge Ingraham, at special term reversed, no opinions being written as the judges did not reserve their decision.
# EUR-Lex - 11965F030 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11965F030

**TREATY ESTABLISHING A SINGLE COUNCIL AND A SINGLE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, CHAPTER V: GENERAL AND FINAL PROVISIONS, ARTICLE 30 **

*
Official Journal L 152 , 13/07/1967 P. 0010 *

++++

ARTICLE 30

THE PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY AND THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY RELATING TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE AND THE EXERCISE OF THIS JURISDICTION SHALL BE APPLICABLE TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS TREATY AND OF THE PROTOCOL ANNEXED THERETO , WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THOSE WHICH REPRESENT AMENDMENTS TO ARTICLES OF THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN COAL AND STEEL COMMUNITY , IN RESPECT OF WHICH THE PROVISIONS OF THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN COAL AND STEEL COMMUNITY SHALL REMAIN APPLICABLE .
Editorial Note on Part 300
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 300 appear at 64 FR 44431, Aug. 16, 1999, and at 76 FR 59305, Sept. 26, 2011.

§ 300.109 Initiating a new fishery. ( a ) A new fishery, for purposes of this section, is a fishery that uses bottom trawls on the high seas of the Convention Area or a fishery for a species, using a particular method, in a statistical subarea or division for which: ( 1 ) Information on distribution, abundance, demography, potential yield and stock identity from comprehensive research/surveys or exploratory fishing has not been submitted to CCAMLR;
( 2 ) Catch and effort data have never been submitted to CCAMLR; or
( 3 ) Catch and effort data from the two most recent seasons in which fishing occurred have not been submitted to CCAMLR.
( b ) Persons intending to develop a new fishery shall notify the Assistant Administrator no later than April 1 for the fishing season that will commence on or after December 1 and shall not initiate the fishery pending NMFS and CCAMLR review or until a vessel permit has been used under this subpart.
( c ) The notification shall be accompanied by a complete vessel permit application required under § 300.107 and information on: ( 1 ) The nature of the proposed fishery, including target species, methods of fishing, proposed region and maximum catch levels proposed for the forthcoming season;
( 2 ) Biological information on the target species from comprehensive research/survey cruises, such as distribution, abundance, demographic data and information on stock identity;
( 3 ) Details of dependent and related species and the likelihood of them being affected by the proposed fishery;
( 4 ) Information from other fisheries in the region or similar fisheries elsewhere that may assist in the evaluation of potential yield; and
( 5 ) If the proposed fishery will be undertaken using bottom trawl gear, the known and anticipated impacts of this gear on vulnerable marine ecosystems, including benthos and benthic communities.
[No. 2080.]

#### Ed. Harwell *alias*Frank Newsom *v.*The State.

Plea op Guilty—Evidence.—With respect to proceedings in the trial court subsequent to the entry of the plea of guilty by the accused, it is provided by statute that, “if the punishment of the offense is not absolutely fixed by law, and beyond the discretion of the jury to graduate in any manner, a jury shall be impaneled to assess the punishment, and evidence submitted to enable them to decide thereon.” This provision of the statute is mandatory, and, instead of being merely for the benefit of the defendant, it is more especially designed to protect the interests of the State, by preventing aggravated cases of crime being compromised by the assessment of the minimum punishment fixed by law. Failure to comply with this provision of the statute in cases to which it applies is fundamental error, and it is advisable that the judgment entry should show compliance with it.

Appeal from the District Court of Burnet County. Tried below before the Hon. W. A. Blackburn.

The conviction in this case was for the theft of a horse, the property of David Stricklin, in Burnet county, Texas, on the 30th day *424of June, 1885. A term of five years in the penitentiary was the penalty assessed upon the appellant’s plea of guilty.

*Fisher, Townes*c6 *Martin, R. H. Ward*and *T. E.*Hammond, for the appellant.

*J. H.*Burts, Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

"Willson, Judge.

This conviction is for the theft of a horse, and was had upon a plea of guilty made by the defendant in open court, in due form of law. (Willson’s Cr. Forms, 688, and authorities cited in note.) But it affirmatively appears from the judgment entry in the case that *no evidence was*introduced upon said plea of guilty.

It is provided by statute that “ If the punishment of the offense is not absolutely fixed by law, and beyond the discretion of the jury to graduate in any manner, a jury shall be impaneled to assess the punishment, and evidence submitted to enable them to decide thereon.” (Code Crim. Proc., arts. 519-534.) We regard this provision as mandatory, and in our opinion it is fundamental error to disregard it. It is not a provision, in so far as it requires evidence to be submitted, which is intended solely for the benefit of the defendant. It is intended, also, and more especially, to protect the interests of the State, by preventing aggravated cases of crime to be covered up by the plea of guilty, so as to allow the criminal to escape with the minimum punishment fixed by law. *(Paul*v. *The State,*17 Texas Ct. App., 583.) In all such cases this provision of the statute should be fully observed and administered, and the better practice would be to have the judgment entry show affirmatively that evidence was adduced upon the plea of guilty. (Willson’s Cr. Forms, 760.)

Because the court erred in not causing evidence to be submitted to enable the jury to decide upon the punishment, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

*Reversed and remanded.*

[Opinion delivered November 25, 1885.]
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

IN RE:

Theodore M Richardson

Marilyn F Richardson

DEBTORS

CASE NO. 16 B 26484

CHAPTER 13

JUDGE DEBORAH L. THORNE

NOTICE OF FINAL CURE PAYMENT

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 3002.1(f), the Chapter 13 Trustee, Marilyn O Marshall 

files this Notice of Final Cure Payment. The amount required to cure the default in the claim listed below 

has been paid in full.

Name of Creditor: Finance of America Reverse LLC

Final Cure Amount

Court

Claim #

Claim

Asserted

Claim

Allowed

Amount

Paid

4 $10,206.21 $10,206.21 $10,206.21

Total Amount Paid by Trustee $10,206.21

Account

Number

XXXXXXXX9250

Monthly Ongoing Mortgage Payment

Mortgage is Paid:

 Through the Chapter 13 Conduit X Direct by the Debtors

Within 21 days of the service of the Notice of Final Cure Payment, the creditor MUST file and serve a 

Statement as a supplement to the holder’s proof of claim on the Debtors, Debtors' Counsel and the 

Chapter 13 Trustee, pursuant to Fed.R.Bank.P.3002.1(g), indicating 1) whether it agrees that the Debtors 

have paid in full the amount required to cure the default on the claim; and 2) whether the Debtors are 

otherwise current on all payments consistent with 11 U.S.C. § 1322(b)(5). 

The statement shall itemize the required cure or post-petition amounts, if any, that the holder contends 

remain unpaid as of the date of the statement. The statement shall be filed as a supplement to the 

holder’s proof of claim and is not subject to Rule 3001(f). Failure to notify may result in sanctions.

Case 16-26484 Doc 36 Filed 09/27/18 Entered 09/27/18 16:46:00 Desc Page 1

 of 2
CASE NO. 16 B 26484

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Notice of Final Cure Payment was served on the parties 

listed below by ordinary U.S. Mail or served electronically through the Court’s ECF System at the e-mail 

address registered with the Court on this 27th day of September, 2018.

Theodore M Richardson, Marilyn F Richardson, 11215 S Longwood, Chicago, IL 60643

ELECTRONIC SERVICE - Daniel M Moulton, 10150 S Western Ave Rear Office, Chicago, IL 60643

Finance of America Reverse LLC, 14405 Walters Rd Ste 200, Houston, TX 77014

ELECTRONIC SERVICE - United States Trustee

Date: September 27, 2018

Marilyn O Marshall

Chapter 13 Trustee

224 S Michigan Ave

Ste 800

Chicago, IL 60604

/s/ Marilyn O Marshall

Case 16-26484 Doc 36 Filed 09/27/18 Entered 09/27/18 16:46:00 Desc Page 2

 of 2
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 11.1


                             AMERICAN BIOMED, INC.

                     COMPUTATION OF (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                             Year Ended         Year Ended         Year Ended
                                             December 31,       December 31,       December 31,
                                               1997                1996                1995
                                            -------------      -------------      -------------
<S>                                         <C>                <C>                <C>
Computation of basic (loss)
  per common share:

  Net (loss)                                $  (2,774,203)     $  (2,625,116)     $  (1,404,384)
  Less Preferred stock dividends                       --         (1,183,413)                --
                                            -------------      -------------      -------------
  Net loss available to common
   Shareholders                           $    (2,774,203)     $  (3,808,529)     $  (1,404,384)
                                            =============      =============      =============
  Weighted average number of common
     Shares outstanding                        15,528,231         11,310,592          9,362,198
                                            =============      =============      =============

Basic (loss) per common share               $       (0.18)     $       (0.34)     $       ( .15)
                                            =============      =============      =============

Computation of (loss) per common
  share assuming full dilution:

  Weighted average number
  of shares outstanding                        15,528,231         11,310,592          9,362,187
                                            =============      =============      =============

(Loss) per common share
assuming full dilution                      $       (0.18)     $       (0.34)     $       ( .15)
                                            =============      =============      =============
</TABLE>
Case 16-28245 Doc 11 Filed 09/07/16 Entered 09/08/16 09:13:27 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
Editorial Note on Part 300
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 300 appear at 64 FR 44431, Aug. 16, 1999, and at 76 FR 59305, Sept. 26, 2011.

§ 300.126 Prohibitions. In addition to the general prohibitions specified in § 600.725 of this title and the prohibited acts specified in § 300.4, it is unlawful for any person to do any of the following: ( a ) Fish in treaty waters without the certificate and permit aboard, or fail to display the certificate and permit, as specified in § 300.123(a) and (f).
( b ) Fail to notify the Regional Administrator of a change in application information, as specified in § 300.123(j).
( c ) Fail to report a vessel's arrival in and departure from treaty waters, as required by § 300.124(a).
( d ) Falsify or fail to display and maintain vessel identification, as required by § 300.125.
( e ) Fail to comply immediately with instructions and signals issued by an enforcement officer of the Republic of Colombia, as specified in § 300.127.
( f ) Operate a factory vessel in treaty waters, as specified in § 300.130(a).
( g ) Use a monofilament gillnet in treaty waters, as specified in § 300.130(b).
( h ) Use autonomous or semi-autonomous diving equipment in treaty waters, as specified in § 300.130(c).
( i ) Use or possess in treaty waters a lobster trap or fish trap without a degradable panel, as specified in § 300.130(d).
( j ) Possess conch smaller than the minimum size limit, as specified in § 300.131(a).
( k ) Fish for or possess conch in the closed area or during the closed season, as specified in § 300.131(b) and (c).
( l ) Retain on board a berried lobster or strip eggs from or otherwise molest a berried lobster, as specified in § 300.132(a).
( m ) Possess a lobster smaller than the minimum size, as specified in § 300.132(b).
( n ) Fail to return immediately to the water unharmed a berried or undersized lobster, as specified in § 300.132(a) and (b).
§ 29.170 What are my responsibilities if I transfer my right to operate? ( a ) If your operations are being conducted under § 29.44, you must notify the Service in writing within 30 calendar days from the date the new operator acquires the rights to conduct operations. Your written notification must include: ( 1 ) The names and addresses of the person or entity conveying the right and of the person or entity acquiring the right;
( 2 ) The effective date of transfer;
( 3 ) The description of the rights, assets, and liabilities being transferred and which ones, if any, are being reserved by the previous operator; and
( 4 ) A written acknowledgement from the new operator that the contents of the notification are true and correct.
( b ) If your operations are being conducted under § 29.43 or an operations permit: ( 1 ) You must provide notice under paragraph (a) of this section.
( 2 ) You remain responsible for compliance with your operations permit, and we will retain your financial assurance until the new operator: ( i ) Adopts and agrees in writing to conduct operations in accordance with all terms and conditions of your operations permit;
( ii ) Provides financial assurance with us that is acceptable to the Service and made payable to the Service; and
( iii ) Receives written notification from the Service that transfer of the operations permit has been approved.
# EUR-Lex - 11992M/PRO/SEBC/01 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11992M/PRO/SEBC/01

**Treaty on European Union - Protocol on the statute of the european system of central banks and of the European Central Bank - Chapter I: Constitution of the ESCB - Article 1: the European system of central banks **

*
Official Journal C 191 , 29/07/1992 P. 0069 *

Article 1

The European System of Central Banks

1.1. The European System of Central Banks (ESCB) and the European Central Bank (ECB) shall be established in accordance with Article 4a of this Treaty; they shall perform their tasks and carry on their activities in accordance with the provisions of this Treaty and of this Statute.

1.2. In accordance with Article 106(1) of this Treaty, the ESCB shall be composed of the ECB and of the central banks of the Member States ('national central banks'). The Institut monétaire luxembourgeois will be the central bank of Luxembourg.

CHAPTER II

OBJECTIVES AND TASKS OF THE ESCB
# EUR-Lex - 11957A/PRO/CJ/09 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957A/PRO/CJ/09

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY ( E.A.E.C. - EURATOM ), PROTOCOL ON THE STATUTE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY, TITLE II - ORGANISATION, ARTICLE 9 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 9

THE REGISTRAR SHALL TAKE AN OATH BEFORE THE COURT TO PERFORM HIS DUTIES IMPARTIALLY AND CONSCIENTIOUSLY AND TO PRESERVE THE SECRECY OF THE DELIBERATIONS OF THE COURT .
###### Editorial Note on Part 300

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 300 appear at 64 FR 44431, Aug. 16, 1999, and at 76 FR 59305, Sept. 26, 2011.

#### § 300.93 Reporting requirements.

Any person fishing for sockeye or pink salmon within the Fraser River Panel Area (U.S.) and any person receiving or purchasing fish caught by such persons are subject to State of Washington reporting requirements at Washington Administrative Code, Chapter 220-69. Treaty Indian fishermen are subject also to tribal reporting requirements. No separate Federal reports are required.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

IN RE:

RAUL A HOARE

DEBTOR

CASE NO. 16 B 25461

CHAPTER 13

JUDGE JACQUELINE P COX

NOTICE OF FINAL CURE PAYMENT

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 3002.1(f), the Chapter 13 Trustee, TOM VAUGHN 

files this Notice of Final Cure Payment. The amount required to cure the default in the claim listed 

below has been paid in full.

Name of Creditor: BANK OF AMERICA

Final Cure Amount

Court

Claim #

Claim

Asserted

Claim

Allowed

Amount

Paid

$544.63 $544.63 $544.63

Total Amount Paid by Trustee $544.63

Account

Number

XXXXXX7985

Claim 

ID

3 16

Monthly Ongoing Mortgage Payment

Mortgage is Paid:

 Through the Chapter 13 Conduit X Direct by the Debtor

Within 21 days of the service of the Notice of Final Cure Payment, the creditor MUST file and serve a 

Statement as a supplement to the holder’s proof of claim on the Debtor, Debtor's Counsel and the 

Chapter 13 Trustee, pursuant to Fed.R.Bank.P.3002.1(g), indicating 1) whether it agrees that the Debtor 

has paid in full the amount required to cure the default on the claim; and 2) whether the Debtor is 

otherwise current on all payments consistent with 11 U.S.C. § 1322(b)(5). 

The statement shall itemize the required cure or post-petition amounts, if any, that the holder contends 

remain unpaid as of the date of the statement. The statement shall be filed as a supplement to the 

holder’s proof of claim and is not subject to Rule 3001(f). Failure to notify may result in sanctions.

Case 16-25461 Doc 31 Filed 04/10/17 Entered 04/10/17 14:36:59 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
CASE NO. 16-25461-JPC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify under penalty of perjury that this office caused a copy of this notice to be delivered to the 

persons named above by U.S. mail at 55 E. MONROE STREET, SUITE 3850, CHICAGO, IL 60603 or 

by the methods indicated on this 10th day of April, 2017.

Debtor:

RAUL A HOARE

3230 W OLIVE AVE

CHICAGO, IL 60659

Attorney:

SULAIMAN LAW GROUP LTD

900 JORIE BLVD # 150

OAK BROOK, IL 60523

via Clerk's ECF noticing procedures

Creditor:

BANK OF AMERICA

PO BOX 660933

DALLAS, TX 75266-0933

Mortgage Creditor:

MANLEY DEAS KOCHALSKI LLC

PO BOX 165028

COLUMBUS, OH 43216-5028

Creditor:

BANK OF AMERICA NA

PO BOX 31785

TAMPA, FL 33631-3785

ELECTRONIC SERVICE - United States Trustee

Date: April 10, 2017

TOM VAUGHN

CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

55 E. MONROE STREET, SUITE 3850

CHICAGO, IL 60603

/s/ TOM VAUGHN

Case 16-25461 Doc 31 Filed 04/10/17 Entered 04/10/17 14:36:59 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 181 (Tuesday, September 19, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 54844]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7749]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463 as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research (DMR) 
<greek-i>1203.
    Dates & Times: October 5, 2006; 7:45 a.m.-9 p.m., October 6, 
2006; 8 a.m.-4:30 p.m.
    Place: Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
    Type of Meeting: Part-Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Thomas Rieker, Program Director, Materials 
Research Science and Engineering Centers Program, Division of 
Materials Research, Room 1065, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone (703) 292-4914.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning further support of the Materials Research Science and 
Engineering Center.

Agenda

Thursday, October 5, 2006

7:45 a.m.-8:45 a.m. Closed--Executive session.
8:45 a.m.-4:15 p.m. Open--Review of the Materials Research Science 
and Engineering Center at Stanford University.
4:15 p.m.-5:30 p.m. Closed--Executive session.
5:30 p.m.-9 p.m. Open--Poster session and Dinner.

Friday, October 6, 2006

8 a.m.-8:45 a.m. Closed--Executive session.
8:45 a.m.-10:45 a.m. Open--Review of the Materials Research Science 
and Engineering Center at Stanford University.
10:45 a.m.-4:30 p.m. Closed--Executive Session, Draft and Review 
Report, brief the center director.

    Reason for Closing: The work being reviewed may include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 522b(c), (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: September 14, 2006.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 06-7749 Filed 9-18-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M