alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5160 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5160

    To expand the sharing of information with respect to suspected 
          violations of intellectual property rights in trade.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 24, 2024

  Mr. Grassley (for himself and Ms. Hassan) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To expand the sharing of information with respect to suspected 
          violations of intellectual property rights in trade.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHARING OF INFORMATION WITH RESPECT TO SUSPECTED VIOLATIONS 
              OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS.

    Section 628A of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1628a) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by 
                striking ``suspects'' and inserting ``has a reasonable 
                suspicion'';
                    (B) in paragraph (1)--
                            (i) by inserting ``, packing materials, 
                        shipping containers,'' after ``its packaging'' 
                        each place it appears; and
                            (ii) by striking ``; and'' and inserting a 
                        semicolon;
                    (C) in paragraph (2), by striking the period and 
                inserting ``; and''; and
                    (D) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) may provide to the person nonpublic information about 
        the merchandise that was--
                    ``(A) generated by an online marketplace or other 
                similar market platform, an express consignment 
                operator, a freight forwarder, or any other entity that 
                plays a role in the sale or importation of merchandise 
                into the United States or the facilitation of such sale 
                or importation; and
                    ``(B) provided to, shared with, or obtained by, 
                U.S. Customs and Border Protection.''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) in paragraph (3), by striking ``; and'' and 
                inserting a semicolon;
                    (B) in paragraph (4), by striking the period at the 
                end and inserting ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(5) any other party with an interest in the merchandise, 
        as determined appropriate by the Commissioner.''.
                                 <all>
```
# EUR-Lex - 12003T055 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12003T055

**Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded - Part five : Provisions relating to the implementation of this Act - Title II : Applicability of the Acts of the Institutions - Article 55 **

*
Official Journal L 236 , 23/09/2003 P. 0048 - 0048 *

Article 55

At the duly substantiated request of one of the new Member States, the Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission, may, before 1 May 2004, take measures consisting of temporary derogations from acts of the institutions adopted between 1 November 2002 and the date of signature of the Treaty of Accession.

--------------------------------------------------
Order entered July 3 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 14 - 00803 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF A .M.G., I.V.G. AND E. G., CHILDREN On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF - 13 - 17718



### O RDER We GRANT the July 1, 2014 extension request of court reporter Shantel Beheler and ORDER the reporter’s record be filed no later than July 10, 2014
. /s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
#### § 27.97 Private operations.

Soliciting business or conducting a commercial enterprise on any national wildlife refuge is prohibited except as may be authorized by special permit.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  IS  NOT  APPLICABLE AS THE ANNUAL SUMMARIES ATTACHED AS
EXHIBIT 13 ARE ANNUALIZED VERSIONS OF THE MONTHLY SERVICER CERTIFICATES
PREPARED BY THE SERVICER AND ARE NOT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE TRUSTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
OSLDPS INFORMATION BULLETIN

No. 31 April 25, 2001

TO: All State Agency Heads

All State Agency Points of Contact

FROM: C.H. “Butch” Straub II

Director

SUBJECT: First Responder Equipment Purchase Program, Defense Logistics Agency

I am pleased to take this opportunity to provide OSLDPS equipment grant recipients with

additional information about the First Responder Equipment Purchase Program announced in

OSLDPS Information Bulletin #13. Please find enclosed detailed information regarding

procurement procedures and contact listings for this important program. This joint effort between

the Office for State and Local Domestic Preparedness Support (OSLDPS) and the Defense

Logistics Agency (DLA) provides an alternative method of equipment procurement for OSLDPS

grantees. Through this program, State, county, and municipal grant recipients can procure basic

defensive equipment for first responders through the DLA Defense Supply Center Philadelphia

(DSCP), potentially saving valuable time and money compared to typical procurement methods. 

We highly encourage all grantees to review the enclosed material and contact your DLA regional

representative to discuss the numerous benefits of this program.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This shedule contains summary financial information extracted from Consolidated
Audited Financial Statements contained in Form 10KSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             26,550
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     872,318
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (46,132)
<INVENTORY>                                       657,416
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                1,654,899
<PP&E>                                          3,716,260
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,026,432)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  6,071,968
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           2,464,766
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                       397,898
<COMMON>                                            1,009
<OTHER-SE>                                      1,648,837
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    6,071,968
<SALES>                                        11,702,540
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               11,702,540
<CGS>                                           9,125,249
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  12,500,493
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                3,375,204
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                297,810
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,095,723)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       28,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,123,723)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,123,723)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .00



</TABLE>
Draft Recommendations of the Clean Air Act Advisory Committee to Fund Projects that Reduce Pollution, Create Jobs and Facilitate the Transition to a Sustainable Economy

(1) Legacy Sources
The Clean Air Act Advisory Comm ittee (CAAAC) examined how to cost-effectively reduce air pollution, create jobs and improve health by buying back or retrofitting old, high emitting sources (legacy sources). Based on the success of California’s Carl Moyer Program and the Texas TERP Program, we recommend the establishment of a national fund to encourage the bu y back or retrofit of legacy sources to reduce air pollution (including criteria, hazardous and other air pollutants). Legacy so urces most appropriate for funding consideration include sources such as old, high emitting lawn and garden equipment, diesel trucks, and smaller stationary sources (e.g., generators, small boilers, wood stoves, etc.). This fund, along with other federal, state and local measures (including regulation), can rapidly reduce legacy source pollution, benefit disadvantaged communities, and create jobs ma nufacturing the replacement or retrofit equipment. Legacy prog rams have proven to be costeffective and should be expanded to a national level.

(2) Economic Stimulus

As a guiding principle, we recommend that projects chosen for funding minimize the impact to the environment by improving air quality and reducing pollution in other environmental media to the extent possible. Projects undertaken should support the development and use of low emitting and advanced technologies and include strategies to reduce, reuse and recycle materials to maximize environmental benefits and encourage the transition to a sustainable economy. For example, inconnection with infrastructureand other funded projects, the use of well-controlled construction equipment, recycled materials, energy efficiency measures and appropriate site selection should be encouraged.
# EUR-Lex - 11997M004 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11997M004

**Treaty on European Union (consolidated version) - Title I: Common provisions - Article 4 - Article D - EU Treaty (Maastricht 1992) **

*
Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0153 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 191 , 29/07/1992 P. 0004 *

Treaty on European Union (consolidated version)

Article 4

The European Council shall provide the Union with the necessary impetus for its development and shall define the general political guidelines thereof.

The European Council shall bring together the Heads of State or Government of the Member States and the President of the Commission. They shall be assisted by the Ministers for Foreign Affairs of the Member States and by a Member of the Commission. The European Council shall meet at least twice a year, under the chairmanship of the Head of State or Government of the Member State which holds the Presidency of the Council.

The European Council shall submit to the European Parliament a report after each of its meetings and a yearly written report on the progress achieved by the Union.
Exhibit 23 

   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement 
(Form S-8 No. 333-21287) pertaining to the 1996 Stock Incentive Plan of 
International Telecommunication Data Systems, Inc. and (Form S-8 No. 
333-21283) pertaining to the 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of 
International Telecommunication Data Systems, Inc. of our report dated 
February 11, 1997, with respect to the financial statements of International 
Telecommunication Data Systems, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996. 

                                                    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Stamford, Connecticut 
February 27, 1997
#### § 28.43 Destruction of dogs and cats.

Dogs and cats running at large on a national wildlife refuge and observed by an authorized official in the act of killing, injuring, harassing or molesting humans or wildlife may be disposed of in the interest of public safety and protection of the wildlife.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 60892 Summary Calendar

KARIMBHAI NOORAJI DHUKA ,
Petitioner

v. LORETTA LYNCH, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL , Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A200 941 628

Before BARKSDALE, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Karimbhai Nooraji Dhuka , a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals ’ (BIA) dismissing his challenge to an Immigration J udge ’s (IJ) denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal , and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT) . Dhuka

asserts the IJ and BIA erred in determin ing he was not credible.

* Pursuant to 5 th Cir. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and i s not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 th Cir. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 5, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-60892 Document: 00513370933 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/05/2016N o. 14

- 60892

2 Credibility de terminations “must be supported by specific and cogent reasons derived from the record”. Z hang v. Gonzales , 432 F.3d 339, 344 (5th Cir. 2005) ; see also Wang v. Holder , 569 F.3d 531, 537 (5th Cir. 2009)

. Because the BIA considered the IJ’s adverse credibility determination, both the BIA
and IJ decisions are reviewed

. Shaikh v. Holder , 588 F.3d 861, 863 (5th Cir. 2009). In that regard, “[w]e defer . . . to an IJ’ s credibility determi nation unless, from the totality of the circumstances, it is plain that no reasonable fact

- finder could make such an adverse credibility ruling”. Wang , 569 F.3d at 538.
In this instance , t he IJ and the BIA gave such “specific and cogent

reasons ” to support the adverse credibility determination

. Although Dhuka
attributed the inconsistencies in his testimony to his mental suffering and fear,
and to advice received from detainees at the detention center, the absence of corroborating evidence in the record does not compel a different conclusion regarding Dhuka’s lack of credibility. Furthermore, t he decision to deny relief from removal was bas ed upon a credibility decision; consequently , we need not address Dhuka’s claims that he otherwise establish ed eligibility for asylum, withholding of removal, and CAT relief. See Chun v. I.N.S. , 4 0 F.3d 76, 78

– 79 (5th Cir. 1994).
AFFIRMED. Case: 14-60892 Document: 00513370933 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/05/2016
Case 16-26245 Doc 14 Filed 09/14/16 Entered 09/15/16 07:33:43 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

Ju ly 1 9 , 2017 

# Order

Clerk Ju ly 1 9 , 2017

155846 ( 4 4 ) (45)

In re PETITION OF ISABELLA COUNTY

TREASURER.

________ ______________________________

ISABELLA COUNTY TREASURER

, P etitioner

- Appellee,

SC: 155 846

v COA: 32 9858

Isabella CC: 2014

- 011664

- CF

ESTATE OF TIMOTHY SCOTT PUNG

, Respondent

- Appellant.

___________________________________________ /

On order of the C hief Justice

, the motion of defendant

- appella nt to extend the time

for filing its reply is GRANTED. The reply will be accepted as timely filed if submitted

on or before July 31 , 2017.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                        1,507
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                               224,191
<ALLOWANCES>                                263,502
<INVENTORY>                                  10,151
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            397,751
<PP&E>                                      687,289
<DEPRECIATION>                              588,977
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              645,474
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     3,215,219
<BONDS>                                           0
<COMMON>                                     40,856
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                               (3,175,633)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                645,474
<SALES>                                   2,046,007
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          2,046,007
<CGS>                                       405,618
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          3,707,965
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           99,459
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (2,167,035)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (2,167,035)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                             (2,167,035)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.57)
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This Certification is intended to accompany the Annual Report of Dorman Products, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 25, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), and is given solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. To the
best of their knowledge, the undersigned, in their respective capacities as set forth below, hereby certify that:

1. The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Steven L. Berman   
|Chief Executive Officer
|Date: March 3, 2011    
|                       
|/s/ Matthew S. Kohnke  
|Chief Financial Officer
|Date: March 3, 2011
Editorial Note on Part 74
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 74 appear at 64 FR 4055, Jan. 27, 1999.

§ 74.852 Equipment changes. ( a ) The licensee of a low power auxiliary station may make any changes in the equipment that are deemed desirable or necessary, including replacement with certificated equipment, without prior Commission approval: *Provided,* The proposed changes will not depart from any of the terms of the station authorization or the Commission's technical rules governing this service: *And provided further,* That any changes made to certificated transmitted equipment shall be in compliance with the provisions of part 2 of the Commission's rules and regulations concerning modification of certificated equipment.
( b ) Any equipment changes made pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section shall be set forth in the next application for renewal of license.
(Sec. 5, 48 Stat. 1068; 47 U.S.C. 155)
[42 FR 14729, Mar. 16, 1977, as amended at 43 FR 13576, Mar. 31, 1978; 63 FR 36605, July 7, 1998]
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________
No. 21

- 14298
Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus JONATHON HOWARD BECK,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 1:20

- cr

- 00137

- CG

- B

- 1

____________________ USCA11 Case: 21-14298 Document: 35-1 Date Filed: 12/05/2022 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 21

- 14298

Before JORDAN, BRANCH, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: James B. Vollmer
, counsel for Jonathon Howard Beck in thisdirect criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , an d Beck ’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. USCA11 Case: 21-14298 Document: 35-1 Date Filed: 12/05/2022 Page: 2 of 2
###### Editorial Note on Part 660

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 660 appear at 67 FR 65906, Oct. 29, 2002, 88 FR 81358, Nov. 22, 2023.

#### § 660.310 Purpose and scope.

This subpart covers the Pacific Coast Groundfish open access fishery. The open access fishery, as defined at § 660.11, subpart C, is the fishery composed of commercial vessels using open access gear fished pursuant to the harvest guidelines, quotas, and other management measures specified for the harvest of open access allocations or governing the fishing activities of open access vessels.