alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Keene Municipal Court,

No. 4682.

#### State *v.*Domingo Echavarria.

Argued November 5, 1958.

Decided November 28, 1958.

*Ernest L. Bell III,*city solicitor (by brief and orally), for the State.

*Kenneth J. Arwe*and *John M. Reynolds (Mr. Reynolds*orally), for the defendant.

Wheeler, J.

The sole question presented is whether the defendant, a resident of this state, may be prosecuted in this state for neglect to support his wife who is a nonresident.

The statute in question RSA 460:23 (supp.) provides: “If any husband or father shall neglect to maintain his wife or children when such wife or children are dependent updn his earnings for support, or neglects his employment or misspends his earnings so as not to provide for the support of his wife or children, he shall be imprisoned not more than one year, and fined not more than one hundred dollars, or both; such fine, if any, to be paid or applied in whole or in part to the support of the wife or children as the court may direct.”

*459The statute, while penal in form, provides that any fine shall be applied “in whole or in part” to the support of the family “as the court may direct.” There is nothing in the wording of the statute that limits its application to the neglected person who happens to be in this state at the time of such neglect to support. In determining jurisdiction some confusion exists between situations where the charge may be abandonment of the wife or children on the one hand and the offense of nonsupporfc on the other. It is the general rule that jurisdiction is in the courts of the place in which the offense was committed; but it is also generally held that nonsupport is a continuing offense which can occur at the place where the wife or children live, at the father’s residence or at both. On the other hand abandonment or desertion, as distinguished from nonsupport, is a single occurrence which generally occurs at one definite place. See anno. 44 A. L. R. (2d) 887, 892; 22 C. J. S., Criminal Law, s. 136(b).

“The offender is here, within our jurisdiction. While residing here he ought to make provision for the support of his wife and minor children, whether they are here or elsewhere. If he fails to do this, his neglect of duty occurs here, without reference to a place where the proper performance of his duty would confer benefits.” *Commonwealth*v. *Acker,*197 Mass. 91, 93; see *In re Alexander,*42 Del. 461, 469. The Keene municipal court has jurisdiction. *Cf. State*v. *Tetreault,*97 N. H. 260.

*Remanded.*

All concurred.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5259 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5259

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude long-term capital 
                        gains from gross income.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 7, 1994

  Mr. Dreier introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude long-term capital 
                        gains from gross income.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME FOR LONG-TERM CAPITAL GAINS.

    (a) In General.--Part III of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to items specifically excluded 
from gross income) is amended by redesignating section 137 as section 
138 and by inserting after section 136 the following new section:

``SEC. 137. 100 PERCENT EXCLUSION FOR LONG-TERM CAPITAL GAIN.

    ``Gross income shall not include 100 percent of any long-term 
capital gain recognized on the sale or exchange of any property.''
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for such part III is 
amended by striking the last item and inserting the following new 
items:

                              ``Sec. 137. 100 percent exclusion for 
                                        long-term capital gain.
                              ``Sec. 138. Cross references to other 
                                        Acts.''
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to sales and exchanges occurring after December 31, 1994, in 
taxable years ending after such date.
                                 <all>
```
COPS Office Anti-Heroin Task Force Program 

FY 2018 Overview 

The COPS Office is pleased to announce the awarding of a total of $27.8 million in FY 2018 funding 

through the Anti-Heroin Task Force (AHTF) program to the following states: Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, 

Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, New Jersey, North Carolina, North Dakota, 

Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, and Wisconsin. 

The COPS Office AHTF program is a competitive grant program designed to advance public safety by 

providing grants to state law enforcement agency task forces to locate or investigate illicit activities 

related to the distribution of heroin or the unlawful distribution of prescription opioids. AHTF provides 

two years of grant funding directly to state law enforcement agencies in states with high per capita 

levels of primary treatment admissions for heroin and other opioids. Since the AHTF program began in 

2015, the COPS Office has awarded nearly $47 million nationwide to combat the opioid crisis. 

Eligible AHTF applications underwent an exhaustive and comprehensive review process. Peer reviewers 

evaluated key factors such as the agencies’ current and proposed heroin investigative activities, their 

participation in related task forces, the strength of their collaboration with other agencies, and their 

HIDTA (High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area) threat assessment. In addition, the COPS Office evaluated 

primary treatment admission rates for heroin and other opioids in making the final funding decisions. 

To acknowledge the urgency of the opioid crisis, President Trump declared a public health emergency on 

October 26, 2017. The abuse of opioids has a devastating impact on public health and safety in this 

country. More than three of five drug overdose deaths involve an opioid. Overdose deaths from opioids, 

including prescription opioids and heroin, have more than quadrupled since 1999. 

The COPS Office looks forward to working with the FY 2018 AHTF grantees to support their efforts in 

fighting this ongoing opioid crisis in their states.
Editorial Note on Part 622
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 622 appear at 79 FR 57837, Sept. 26, 2014 and at 81 FR 32253, May 23, 2016.

§ 622.415 Limited exemption regarding harvest in waters of a foreign nation. ( a ) An owner or operator of a vessel that has legally harvested spiny lobsters in the waters of a foreign nation and possesses spiny lobster, or separated tails, in the EEZ incidental to such foreign harvesting is exempt from the requirements of this subpart, except for § 622.409 with which such an owner or operator must comply, provided proof of lawful harvest in the waters of a foreign nation accompanies such lobsters or tails.
( b ) [Reserved]
[84 FR 37153, July 31, 2019]
§ 25.24 Drain tile setbacks. ( a ) *Applicability.* The regulations in this section apply to any easement lands protected by a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service easement for waterfowl management rights (commonly referred to as a wetland easement) that were acquired through the Small Wetlands Acquisition Program in the Prairie Pothole Region of Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota. The regulations in this section apply only to setbacks provided by the Service beginning on June 12, 2024.
( b ) *Drainage tile setbacks.* Upon the request of a landowner, using FWS Form 3-2554, the Service will provide setback distances for the placement of drain tile on lands covered by wetland easements. The setback distances will be based on the best available science and must be adequate to ensure that protected wetland areas are not drained. Contact your local U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service station to obtain further information. You can obtain contact information for your local Service station by contacting one of the Service regional offices; addresses for these offices are at 50 CFR 2.2.
( c ) *Protection from legal redress.* The Service will provide guidance to landowners about what materials should be submitted as part of a request and will provide setback distances to landowners within a Service-provided timeframe. When a landowner coordinates tile planning with the Service in accordance with the regulations in this section and adheres to the Service-provided drain tile setback distances, including the tile diameters and tile depths below the surface that were used to calculate the Service-provided drain tile setback distances, the Service will not seek legal redress if it is later determined that the drain tile setback distances provided by the Service failed to protect the wetland areas from drainage, provided that the drain tile has not been modified, enhanced, or replaced.
[89 FR 41345, May 13, 2024]
§ 260.102 Equipment. All equipment used for receiving, washing, segregating, picking, processing, packaging, or storing any processed products or any ingredients used in the manufacture or production thereof, shall be of such design, material, and construction as will: ( a ) Enable the examination, segregation, preparation, packaging, and other processing operations applicable to processed products, in an efficient, clean, and sanitary manner, and
( b ) Permit easy access to all parts to insure thorough cleaning and effective bactericidal treatment. Insofar as is practicable, all such equipment shall be made of smooth impermeable corrosion-resistant material that will not adversely affect the processed product by chemical action or physical contact. Such equipment shall be kept in good repair and sanitary condition. Such equipment shall be cleaned and sanitized at a frequency as is necessary or required in accordance with Good Manufacturing Practice Regulations, 21 CFR part 128.
[36 FR 21041, Nov. 3, 1971]
#### § 35.10 Controlled burning.

Controlled burning will be permitted on wilderness units when such burning will contribute to the maintenance of the wilderness resource and values in the unit; however, any fire in a wilderness area that poses a threat to resources or facilities outside the unit will be controlled and extinguished.

[36 FR 25426, Dec. 31, 1971, as amended at 37 FR 12067, June 17, 1972]
#### § 260.24 Financial interest of inspector.

No inspector shall inspect any processed product in which he is directly or indirectly financially interested.
lvxi_ex101.htm

EXHIBIT 10.1  
 
	 RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED BY
UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT
OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
Las Vegas Xpress, Inc.
a Nevada corporation
 


  
The undersigned being a unanimous action taken by the Board of Directors of the Las Vegas Xpress, Inc. (the "Corporation"), hereby consent to take the following action and adopt the following recitals and resolutions effective as of July 27, 2020. 
 
  APPOINTMENT OF BOARD MEMBER
  
WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the Corporation and its stockholders that the following actions herewith be approved, and;
 
WHEREAS, it is recognized that the Board has a vacancy for one seat, and; 
 
WHEREAS, it is recognized that Joseph Cosio-Barron shall be appointed to serve on the Board of Directors effective immediately, and; 
 
WHEREAS, the term of employment shall be based on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth on the Board of Directors Services Agreement.  
 
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the Corporation shall appoint Joseph Cosio-Barron as a member to the Board of Directors, and; 
 
RESOLVED FURTHER, that the Board of Directors of the Corporation shall appoint Joseph Cosio-Barron to serve on the Board of Directors effective immediately, and; 
 
RESOLVED FURTHER, the term shall be consistent with the employment agreements, and;
 
RESOLVED FURTHER, that the Board of Directors of this Corporation are hereby authorized to join in the execution of, or attest and/or affix the corporate seal of the Corporation to, any document, agreement or instrument executed by the Chief Executive Officer or any other authorized officer of this Corporation on behalf of the Corporation in furtherance of the foregoing resolutions; and
 
RESOLVED FURTHER, that the officers of this Corporation are and each hereby is authorized to do and perform all such further actions and things and to sign all such further documents, certificates and other writings and to take all such further actions as may be necessary or advisable or convenient or proper to carry out the intent of the foregoing, and;
 
RESOLVED FURTHER, that the authority given hereunder shall supersede the actions and appointments taken on the Board of Directors meetings to date. Any and all acts authorized hereunder are hereby ratified and affirmed.
 
	 
	
	

	 

  
This Unanimous Written Consent may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which together shall be one and the same instrument. This Unanimous Written Consent shall be filed in the Minute Book of the Corporation and become a part of the records of this Corporation.
 
	 	 	 	 
			/s/ Albert Koenigsberg	
	  
	  
	Albert Koenigsberg	 
	 	 	 	 
	  
	  
	 /s/ Glenn Corso
	  

	  
	  
	 Glenn Corso
	  

	  
	  
	  
	  

	  
	  
	 /s/ Richard Ziccardi
	  

	  
	  
	 Richard Ziccardi
	  

	  
	  
	  
	  

	  
	  
	 /s/ Richard Rotanz
	  

	  
	  
	 Richard Rotanz
#### § 600.1100 [Reserved]
Coordinated Tribal 

Assistance Solicitation (CTAS)

FY 2024 Open Office Hours Schedule

About Open Office Hours

Join CTAS Purpose Area representatives, Office of the Chief Financial Officer, and JustGrants for 

drop-in discussions and/or question and answer sessions as you prepare your final CTAS grant 

submission documents. Office hours will offer an opportunity, as needed, for one-on-one 

conversations in a virtual breakout room to allow sufficient time to answer questions specific to your 

tribe/tribal consortium. Attendees will have the opportunity to unmute their microphone for discussion.

Please note, a formal presentation will not be provided during open office hours. Recordings of the 

FY 2024 Solicitation Webinar presentations can be found on the CTAS Resources website.

Open Office Hours Schedule

Wednesday, February 28, 2024 | 2:00 PM – 2:45 PM Eastern Time

Registration link: https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZEvc-iorjgtH9BLojYC8agieOk70nc8os73

Wednesday, March 6, 2024 | 2:00 PM – 2:45 PM Eastern Time

Registration link: https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZEqd-mgpz8tHteZEGowtyWVD_RYTxS78zzm

Helpful Resources

Accessing Grants Workshop

Recorded November 8-9, 2022

Workshop Link: www.ncjtc.org/accessgrantsworkshop

FY 2024 Solicitation Webinars

Recorded / Scheduled

Webinar Links: www.ncjtc.org/ctasresources
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 542

To extend the statute of limitations applicable to civil actions brought by

the Federal conservator or receiver of a failed depository institution.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 21, 1993

Mr. STARK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs

A BILL

To extend the statute of limitations applicable to civil actions

brought by the Federal conservator or receiver of a failed

depository institution.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.

4 (a) DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS OTHER THAN CRED5 IT UNIONS.—Section 11(d)(14)(A)(ii)(I) of the Federal

6 Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1821(d)(14)(A)(ii)(I))

7 is amended by striking ‘‘3-year period’’ and inserting

8 ‘‘5-year period’’.

9 (b) CREDIT UNIONS.—Section 207(b)(14)(A)(ii)(I)

10 of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C.
2

•HR 542 IH

1 1787(b)(14)(A)(ii)(I)) is amended by striking ‘‘3-year pe2 riod’’ and inserting ‘‘5-year period’’.

3 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATES.

4 (a) DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS OTHER THAN CRED5 IT UNIONS.—The amendment made by section 1(a) shall

6 take effect as if such amendment had been included in

7 the amendment made by section 212(a) of the Financial

8 Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of

9 1989 as of the effective date of such section.

10 (b) CREDIT UNIONS.—The amendment made by sec11 tion 1(b) shall take effect as if such amendment had been

12 included in the amendment made by section 1217(a)(4)

13 of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and En14 forcement Act of 1989 as of the effective date of such sec15 tion.

Æ
§ 64.201 Restrictions on indecent telephone message services. ( a ) It is a defense to prosecution for the provision of indecent communications under section 223(b)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the Act), 47 U.S.C. 223(b)(2), that the defendant has taken the action set forth in paragraph (a)(1) of this section and, in addition, has complied with the following: Taken one of the actions set forth in paragraphs (a)(2), (3), or (4) of this section to restrict access to prohibited communications to persons eighteen years of age or older, and has additionally complied with paragraph (a)(5) of this section, where applicable: ( 1 ) Has notified the common carrier identified in section 223(c)(1) of the Act, in writing, that he or she is providing the kind of service described in section 223(b)(2) of the Act.
( 2 ) Requires payment by credit card before transmission of the message; or
( 3 ) Requires an authorized access or identification code before transmission of the message, and where the defendant has: ( i ) Issued the code by mailing it to the applicant after reasonably ascertaining through receipt of a written application that the applicant is not under eighteen years of age; and
( ii ) Established a procedure to cancel immediately the code of any person upon written, telephonic or other notice to the defendant's business office that such code has been lost, stolen, or used by a person or persons under the age of eighteen, or that such code is no longer desired; or
( 4 ) Scrambles the message using any technique that renders the audio unintelligible and incomprehensible to the calling party unless that party uses a descrambler; and,
( 5 ) Where the defendant is a message sponsor subscriber to mass announcement services tariffed at this Commission and such defendant prior to the transmission of the message has requested in writing to the carrier providing the public announcement service that calls to this message service be subject to billing notification as an adult telephone message service.
( b ) A common carrier within the District of Columbia or within any State, or in interstate or foreign commerce, shall not, to the extent technically feasible, provide access to a communication described in section 223(b) of the Act from the telephone of any subscriber who has not previously requested in writing the carrier to provide access to such communication if the carrier collects from subscribers an identifiable charge for such communication that the carrier remits, in whole or in part, to the provider of such communication.
[52 FR 17761, May 12, 1987, as amended at 55 FR 28916, July 16, 1990]
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P103People with Mental Illness POP GuideLaw enforcement officers encounter people with mental illness in many different types of situations, in roles that include criminal offenders, disorderly persons, missing persons, complainants, victims and persons in need of care. This guide is an essential tool for local law enforcement to analyze their local problem associated with people with mental illness and reviews responses to these problems based on evaluative research and police practice.By Rana SampsonCategories: Community Partnerships • POP Center ResourceLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p103Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Jun 2006Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 05:22 (UTC-5) in 0.89 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
§ 20.133 Hunting regulations for crows. ( a ) Crows may be taken, possessed, transported, exported, or imported, only in accordance with such laws or regulations as may be prescribed by a State pursuant to this section.
( b ) Except in the State of Hawaii, where no crows shall be taken, States may by statute or regulation prescribe a hunting season for crows. Such State statutes or regulations may set forth the method of taking, the bag and possession limits, the dates and duration of the hunting season, and such other regulations as may be deemed appropriate, subject to the following limitations for each State: ( 1 ) Crows shall not be hunted from aircraft;
( 2 ) The hunting season or seasons on crows shall not exceed a total of 124 days during a calendar year;
( 3 ) Hunting shall not be permitted during the peak crow nesting period within a State; and
( 4 ) Crows may only be taken by firearms, bow and arrow, and falconry.