alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P052San Diego Police Department: Enhancing Cultures of Integrity Technical Assistance GuideEarly Intervention System-a system that statistically compares law enforcement employee performance against a range of numerical norms, and helps assess which employee may need help with their personal or professional problems- is being adopted nationwide. Using the Enhancing Cultures of Integrity Grant that was issued by the Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (the COPS Office), the San Diego Police Department has adopted its own EI system. The Early Identification and Intervention System (EIIS) was complex to design and apply, and has been an overall success. In this guide, the SDPD documents its experience, along with a very useful step-by-step outline, in order to help other agencies build their own successful system.By Mike Gibbs, Carolyn KendrickCategories: Ethics and IntegrityLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p052Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Apr 2011Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 02:13 (UTC-5) in 0.23 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
Argued and submitted July 27, 1993,

affirmed May 4, 1994

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*WALLACE ERIC NELSON, aka Walter Eric Neil, *Appellant.*

(91CR0627; CA A74368)

874 P2d 108

Ingrid A. MacFarlane, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.

Jonathan H. Fussner, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and Riggs* and De Muniz, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*

 Riggs, J., *vice*Durham, J.

*742PER CURIAM

Defendant, after pleading no contest, was convicted of burglary in the first degree. ORS 164.225. He appeals from the judgment requiring him to pay restitution in the amount of $10,000 to the Crime Victim’s Compensation Program. However, an order of restitution is part of a defendant’s sentence. *State v. Hart,*299 Or 128, 140-41, 699 Or 1113 (1985); *see also*ORS 137.106 (“In addition to any other sentence it may impose, the court may order that the defendant make restitution to the victim.”). Because defendant’s sentence is the result of a negotiated plea, it is not reviewable by this court under the version of ORS 138.222(2) (d) in effect at the time of his sentence. *State v. George,*127 Or App 581, 873 P2d 468 (1994).

Affirmed.
COPS Anti-Heroin Task Force Program – FY 2017 Overview

The COPS Office is pleased to announce the awarding of a total of $7.19 million in FY 2017 funding through the 

Anti-Heroin Task Force Program (AHTF) to the states of Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New 

Jersey, New York, and Vermont.

The COPS Office Anti-Heroin Task Force (AHTF) Program is a competitive grant program designed to advance 

public safety by providing grants to state law enforcement agency task forces to locate or investigate illicit activities 

related to the distribution of heroin or the unlawful distribution of prescription opioids. AHTF provides two years of 

grant funding directly to state law enforcement agencies in states with high per capita levels of primary treatment 

admissions for heroin and other opioids. Since the AHTF Program began in 2015, the COPS Office has awarded nearly 

$19 million nationwide to combat the opioid crisis.

Eligible AHTF applications underwent a comprehensive review process by external heroin and other opioid 

subject matter expert (SME) peer reviewers. Reviewers evaluated key factors such as the agencies’ current and 

proposed heroin investigative activities, their participation in related task forces, the strength of their collaboration with 

other agencies, and their HIDTA (High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area) Threat Assessment. In addition, the COPS Office 

evaluated primary treatment admission rates for heroin and other opioids in making the final funding decisions. 

To acknowledge the sense of urgency regarding the opioid crisis, President Trump declared a Public Health 

Emergency on October 26, 2017. The abuse of opioids has a devastating impact on public health and safety in this 

country. More than three out of five drug overdose deaths involve an opioid. Overdose deaths from opioids, including 

prescription opioids and heroin, have more than quadrupled since 1999. 

The COPS Office looks forward to working with the FY 2017 AHTF Program grantees to support their efforts in 

fighting this ongoing opioid crisis within their states.
# EUR-Lex - 11992E088 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11992E088

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY - TITLE V : COMMON RULES ON COMPETITION TAXATION AND APPROXIMATION OF LAWS - CHAPITRE 1 : RULES OF COMPETITION - SECTION 1 : RULES APPLYING TO UNDERTAKINGS - ARTICLE 88 /* CODIFIED VERSION OF THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY */ **

*
Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0029 *

Article 88

Until the entry into force of the provisions adopted in pursuance of Article 87, the authorities in Member States shall rule on the admissibility of agreements, decisions and concerted practices and on abuse of a dominant position in the common market in accordance with the law of their country and with the provisions of Article 85, in particular paragraph 3, and of Article 86.
----

            DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE         

No 175/2004

of 3 December 2004         

amending Annex XXI (Statistics) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following shall be inserted after point 27 (Regulation (EC) No 2150/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XXI to the Agreement:

                     ‘                     INFORMATION SOCIETY STATISTICS

Article 2

The texts of Regulation (EC) No 808/2004 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 4 December 2004, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 3 December 2004.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kjartan JÓHANNSSON            

----

(1)OJ L 102, 21.4.2005, p. 43.

(2)OJ L 143, 30.4.2004, p. 49.

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

----
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5004

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that a consent

to waive a survivor annuity form of retirement benefit shall also be

effective if made before marriage.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 19, 1994

Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was referred

jointly to the Committees on Ways and Means and Education and Labor

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

that a consent to waive a survivor annuity form of retirement benefit shall also be effective if made before marriage.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. WAIVER OF SURVIVOR ANNUITY FORM OF RE4 TIREMENT BENEFIT MAY BE MADE BEFORE

5 MARRIAGE.

6 (a) AMENDMENT OF INTERNAL REVENUE CODE.—

7 Paragraph (2) of section 417(a) of the Internal Revenue

8 Code of 1986 (relating to definitions and special rules for
2

•HR 5004 IH

1 purposes of minimum survivor annuity requirements) is

2 amended by adding at the end the following new sentence:

3 ‘‘A consent by an individual who becomes the spouse of

4 the participant shall be effective with respect to such indi5 vidual if such consent meets the requirements of subpara6 graph (A) (determined by treating such individual as the

7 spouse of the participant) and such consent is made within

8 1 year before the date such individual becomes the spouse

9 of the participant.’’

10 (b) AMENDMENT OF ERISA.—Paragraph (2) of sec11 tion 205(c) of the Employee Retirement Income Security

12 Act of 1974 (relating to requirement of joint and survivor

13 annuity and preretirement survivor annuity) is amended

14 by adding at the end the following new sentence: ‘‘A con15 sent by an individual who becomes the spouse of the par16 ticipant shall be effective with respect to such individual

17 if such consent meets the requirements of subparagraph

18 (A) (determined by treating such individual as the spouse

19 of the participant) and such consent is made within 1 year

20 before the date such individual becomes the spouse of the

21 participant.’’

22 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

23 this section shall apply to consents made after the date

24 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Burt Lee Burnett, * From the 42nd District Court

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 28325A

Vs. No. 11-21-00038-CR * December 8, 2022

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Williams, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-60959

Summary Calendar

OTIS LEE FAIRLEY, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

MILDRED DAVIS; CHARLOTTE ALFORD; BETSY ENDT, 

 Defendants – Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:86-CV-169

Before REAVLEY, JONES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Pro se Appellant appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to 

compel the Mississippi Department of Corrections (MDOC) to upgrade him to 

“A” custody pursuant to a settlement agreement. In 1986, Appellant, who had 

been convicted of murdering a Mississippi Highway Patrolman and was 

serving a life sentence, filed a civil rights complaint asserting that MDOC had 

confined him for six months without due process. In 1988, the parties reached 

a settlement. Appellant contends that he agreed to dismiss his case in 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 8, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 12-60959 Document: 00512589690 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/08/2014
No. 12-60959

exchange for MDOC’s agreement to place him in “A” custody, the least 

restrictive confinement. Appellant remained in “A” custody until 2011, when 

he was downgraded to “B” custody. Shortly thereafter, Appellant filed a 

motion seeking enforcement of the settlement agreement. The district court 

denied Appellant’s motion. We AFFIRM. 

Appellant challenges the district court’s conclusion that MDOC 

reasonably complied with the 1988 settlement agreement by affording him “A”

custody for 23 years. Appellant, however, has not submitted a copy of the 

settlement agreement, and neither MDOC nor the district court that presided 

over Appellant’s 1986 civil rights case remain in possession of the agreement. 

Under the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Appellant bears the burden 

of submitting evidence relevant to a challenged conclusion or finding. FED. R.

APP. P. 10(b)(2). Appellant has failed to meet this burden. Accordingly, the 

denial of Appellant’s motion is AFFIRMED. 

2

 Case: 12-60959 Document: 00512589690 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/08/2014
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Everflow Eastern Partners, L.P. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Thomas L. Korner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Thomas L. Korner
------------------------------

Thomas L. Korner
Chief Executive Officer
March 26, 2004
§ 80.106 Intercommunication in the mobile service. ( a ) Each public coast station must exchange radio communications with any ship or aircraft station at sea; and each station on shipboard or aircraft at sea must exchange radio communications with any other station on shipboard or aircraft at sea or with any public coast station.
( b ) Each public coast station must acknowledge and receive all communications from mobile stations directed to it, transmit all communications delivered to it which are directed to mobile stations within range in accordance with their tariffs. Discrimination in service is prohibited.
EXHIBIT 11.0
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                            DIGITAL BIOMETRICS, INC.
                   STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER SHARE

                                                                YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                     -------------------------------------------
                                                         1996           1995            1994
                                                     -----------    ------------    ------------

<S>                                                 <C>             <C>             <C>      
Shares outstanding at beginning of year                7,833,633       7,787,959       7,394,837

Shares awarded for retirement plan                        16,831           8,814           5,090

Restricted stock awards                                   17,456           6,360          32,046

Exercise of stock options and warrants                   157,500          30,500         317,838

Acquisition of Design Data, Inc.                            --              --            38,148

Shares issued upon conversion of debentures            2,751,868            --              --

                                                    ------------    ------------    ------------
Shares outstanding at end of year                     10,777,288       7,833,633       7,787,959
                                                    ============    ============    ============

Weighted average shares outstanding (A)                9,451,015       7,814,144       7,696,551
                                                    ============    ============    ============

Net loss                                            $ (9,763,374)   $ (3,324,555)   $ (3,797,315)
                                                    ============    ============    ============

Loss per common share and common and
common share equivalents                            $      (1.03)   $      (0.43)   $      (0.49)
                                                    ============    ============    ============
</TABLE>


(A) Stock options and other common share equivalents are not included in the
    calculation of the net loss per common share as their effect is
    antidilutive.
§ 80.327 Urgency signals and messages. ( a ) The urgency signal indicates that the calling station has a very urgent message to transmit concerning the safety of a ship, aircraft, or other vehicle, or the safety of a person. The urgency signal must be sent only on the authority of the master or person responsible for the mobile station.
( b ) In radiotelegraphy, the urgency signal consists of three repetitions of the group XXX, sent with the individual letters of each group, and the successive groups clearly separated from each other. It must be transmitted before the call.
( c ) In radiotelephony, the urgency signal consists of three oral repetitions of the group of words PAN PAN transmitted before the call.
( d ) The urgency signal has priority over all other communications except distress. All mobile and land stations which hear it must not interfere with the transmission of the message which follows the urgency signal.
( e ) The urgency signal and call, and the message following it, must be sent on one of the international distress frequencies. Stations which cannot transmit on a distress frequency may use any other available frequency on which attention might be attracted.
( f ) Mobile stations which hear the urgency signal must continue to listen for at least three minutes. At the end of this period, if no urgency message has been heard, they may resume their normal service. However, land and mobile stations which are in communication on frequencies other than those used for the transmission of the urgency signal and of the call which follows it may continue their normal work without interruption provided the urgency message is not addressed “to all stations”.
( g ) When the urgency signal has been sent before transmitting a message “to all stations” which calls for action by the stations receiving the message, the station responsible for its transmission must cancel it as soon as it knows that action is no longer necessary. This message of cancellation must likewise be addressed “to all stations”.
[51 FR 31213, Sept. 2, 1986, as amended at 52 FR 35245, Sept. 18, 1987; 73 FR 4485, Jan. 25, 2008]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,783,800                 423,272
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,118,483               9,016,909
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (280,000)               (213,000)
<INVENTORY>                                 18,522,875               8,803,909
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,813,184              14,844,695
<PP&E>                                      11,956,612               5,699,504
<DEPRECIATION>                             (5,320,957)             (2,795,410)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              58,928,292              31,423,379
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,079,021              14,343,704
<BONDS>                                     16,958,227               3,306,821
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                    49,317,500              37,770,563
<OTHER-SE>                                (26,426,456)            (23,997,709)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                58,928,292              31,423,379
<SALES>                                     48,151,988               4,767,233
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            48,151,988               4,767,233
<CGS>                                       31,565,514               3,130,958
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               49,270,672               5,898,719
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (91,956)                (34,190)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,293,243                  99,255
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,319,971)             (1,196,551)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,319,971)             (1,196,551)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.13)                   (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.13)                   (.09)
        

</TABLE>
Case 16-24973 Doc 4 Filed 08/03/16 Entered 08/03/16 14:52:51 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-24973 Doc 4 Filed 08/03/16 Entered 08/03/16 14:52:51 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Summary of items of engineeringinterest**
 
1998 | 2000 | 2002 | 2010
 
SuDoc Number:A 68.25:
Item Number:0115-A-07 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000558392
 
February 13, 2020
No. 11-5928.

#### Baker *v.*Gerdenich Realty Co.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.