alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Air Quality Modeling Data Drives for the 

2008 NAAQS CSAPR Proposal

This document describes data drives containing certain air quality modeling data files, 

run scripts, and codes that were used for the proposed CSAPR for the 2008 ozone 

NAAQS. These data drives are in the docket office.

Information on the air quality modeling performed for this proposed rule including a 

description of the modeling domains, model inputs, emissions scenarios, contribution 

modeling, and results can be found in the Air Quality Modeling Technical Support 

Document. Information on the emissions data can be found in the Emissions Inventory 

Technical Support Document. 

The data drives contain input/output data files for the following scenarios:

- 2011 base year (case name: 2011eh_cb6v2_v6_11g)

- 2017 base case (case name: 2017eh_cb6v2_v6_11g)

- 2017 base case contribution modeling (case name: 2017eh_ussa_cb6v2_v6_11g)

- 2017 illustrative control case (case name: 2017eh_cntl_cb6v2_v6_11g)

The table below identifies the types of air quality model input and output data on the 

drives. In addition to these data, the drives contain (1) the scripts and meteorological data 

output from the Weather Research Forecast Model run for 2011, (2) the CAMx model 

code and scripts and wrftcamx code and scripts used for the proposed rule modeling, (3) 

post-processing codes and files used for calculating the ozone contribution metric values, 

(4) Model Attainment Test Software input files for ozone and PM2.5, and (5) data files 

containing spatial fields of ozone concentrations and PM2.5 concentrations for selected 

averaging times for use in the calculation of the monetized benefits of the rule as reported 

in the Regulatory Impact Assessment.

Emissions Data

- "model-ready" inputs for CAMx modeling of each emissions case

- "pre-merged" intermediate files by emissions sector

- "raw" emissions inventories

- ancillary files and scripts for processing emissions

Non-Emissions Inputs

- "model-ready" meteorology for 2011 output from wrfcamx

- photolysis rates files

- surface/landuse/ocean mask/satmap files

- ozone column data

- initial and boundary concentration data

CAMx Outputs - layer 1 gridded hourly concentrations for each model run

- layer 1 gridded hourly ozone contributions for the 2017eh_ussa case

EPA will respond to specific requests for these data or specific additional inputs and 

outputs of the modeling process, depending on the availability of those data. 

Requests for electronic copies of the proposed rule data should be sent to Norm Possiel 

(possiel.norm@epa.gov), Brian Timin (timin.brian@epa.gov), and Alison Eyth 

(eyth.alison@epa.gov)
§ 402.42 Scope and applicability. ( a ) *Available consultation procedures.* This subpart describes consultation procedures available to EPA to satisfy the obligations of section 7(a)(2) of the Act in addition to those in subpart B of this part for FIFRA actions authorized, funded, or carried out by EPA in which EPA has discretionary Federal involvement or control. EPA retains discretion to initiate early, informal, or formal consultation as described in §§ 402.11, 402.13, and 402.14 for any FIFRA action. The procedures in this subpart may be employed for FIFRA actions as follows: ( 1 ) Interagency exchanges of information under § 402.43 and advance coordination under § 402.44 are available for any FIFRA action.
( 2 ) Alternative consultation under § 402.45 is available for a listed species or critical habitat if EPA determines the FIFRA action is not likely to adversely affect the listed species or critical habitat.
( 3 ) Optional formal consultation under § 402.46 is available for any FIFRA action with respect to any listed species or critical habitat.
( 4 ) The special procedures in § 402.47 are available for consultations on FIFRA actions that will be unusually complex due to factors such as the geographic area or number of species that may be affected by the action.
( 5 ) EPA shall engage in consultation as to all listed species and critical habitat that may be affected by a FIFRA action, and may in its discretion employ more than one of the available consultation procedures for a FIFRA action that may affect more than one listed species or critical habitat.
( 6 ) EPA shall engage in consultation on actions involving requests for emergency exemptions under section 18 of FIFRA that may affect listed species or critical habitat, and may choose to do so under § 402.05 or other provisions of this subpart or subpart B of this part. Any required formal consultation shall be initiated as soon as practicable after the emergency is under control. For the purposes of § 402.05(b) the definition of formal consultation in § 402.02 includes the procedures in § 402.46.
( 7 ) EPA must prepare a biological assessment for a FIFRA action to the extent required by § 402.12.
( 8 ) EPA must comply with § 402.15 for all FIFRA actions.
( 9 ) After a consultation under this subpart has been concluded, EPA shall reinitiate consultation as required by § 402.16 as soon as practicable after a circumstance requiring reinitiation occurs, and may employ the procedures in this subpart or subpart B of this part in any reinitiated consultation.
( b ) *Exchanges of scientific information.* As part of any of the additional consultation procedures provided in this subpart, EPA and the Services shall establish mutually-agreeable procedures for regular and timely exchanges of scientific information to achieve accurate and informed decision-making under this subpart and to ensure that the FIFRA process considers the best scientific and commercial data available on listed species and critical habitat in a manner consistent with the requirements of FIFRA and ESA.
**Read more of the June Dispatch**
    - Long Branch Police Create Safe Havens for Victims of Hate
    - Increasing Engagement With the LGBTQ+ Community
    - From Reactive Policing to Proactive Community Service: Collaborative Reform in Salinas  
    - Strategies to Bolster Law Enforcement Workforces: The 2023 Recruitment and Retention Meeting 
    - Michigan State University Police Staffing Observatory Offers Guidance and Collaboration  
    - The TraffickSTOP Curriculum 
    - Join Us at the 2023 Problem-Oriented Policing Conference
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Agreements Adopted by the Traffic 

Ckjnferences of the International Air 

Transport Association 

OST-2009-0328 

APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS 

BY THE 

INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION 

lATA AGREEMENT APPROVED & IMMUNIZED 

DOCKET QST- 0 9 . £>5^ ^ ACTION DATE ^-^ - '^'2-. "^" / ^ 

This approval and grant of antitrust immunity is subject, where applicable, 

to conditions previously imposed. 

Th>' Hctior is elt'ective after 7 days unless a petition is filed under 

14 LPK. J85.30 or a ri;view is undertaken on the Department's own motion. 

in view of the agreement's noncontroversial nature and the availability of 

the above/iJf3cedure, thei Wa>«rjpjJ in 14 CFR 303.42 is waived. 

Director, Office of International Aviation 

04 December 2009 

Communications with respect to 

this document should be sent to 

Douglas E. Lavin 

Regional Vice President - North America 

International Air Transport Association 

lATA Washington, 

601 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Suite 300 - North Building 

Washington DC 20004
§ 95.393 Instructions and warnings. ( a ) A user's instruction manual must be supplied with each transmitter that can be used in a Personal Radio Service.
( b ) The manual described in paragraph (a) of this section must contain all information necessary for the proper installation and operation of the transmitter including: ( 1 ) Instructions concerning all controls, adjustments and switches that may be operated or adjusted without resulting in a violation of FCC rules;
( 2 ) Warnings concerning any adjustment that could result in a violation of FCC rules or that is recommended to be performed only by or under the immediate supervision and responsibility of a person certified as technically qualified to perform transmitter maintenance and repair duties in the relevant radio service by an organization or committee representative of users of that service;
( 3 ) Warnings concerning the replacement of any transmitter component (crystal, semiconductor, etc.) that could result in a violation of FCC rules; and
( 4 ) For a transmitter that can only be operated with an FCC license, warnings concerning compliance with applicable licensing requirements and information concerning license application procedures.
§ 217.43 Prohibitions. Notwithstanding takings contemplated in § 217.42 and authorized by LOAs issued under §§ 216.106 of this chapter and 217.46, no person in connection with the activities described in § 217.40 may: ( a ) Violate, or fail to comply with, the terms, conditions, and requirements of this subpart or a LOA issued under §§ 216.106 of this chapter and 217.46;
( b ) Take any marine mammal not specified in such LOAs; and
( c ) Take any marine mammal specified in such LOAs in any manner other than as specified.
No. 11-8748.

#### Rader *v.*Ogden City, Utah.

Ct. App. Utah. Certiorari denied.
# EUR-Lex - 11957E028 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957E028

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY, PART TWO - FOUNDATIONS OF THE COMMUNITY, TITLE I - FREE MOVEMENT OF GOODS, CHAPTER 1: THE CUSTOMS UNION, SECTION 2: SETTING UP OF THE COMMON CUSTOMS TARIFF, ARTICLE 28 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 28

ANY AUTONOMOUS ALTERATION OR SUSPENSION OF DUTIES IN THE COMMON CUSTOMS TARIFF SHALL BE DECIDED UNANIMOUSLY BY THE COUNCIL . AFTER THE TRANSITIONAL PERIOD HAS ENDED , HOWEVER , THE COUNCIL MAY , ACTING BY A QUALIFIED MAJORITY ON A PROPOSAL FROM THE COMMISSION , DECIDE ON ALTERATIONS OR SUSPENSIONS WHICH SHALL NOT EXCEED 20 PER CENT OF THE RATE IN THE CASE OF ANY ONE DUTY FOR A MAXIMUM PERIOD OF SIX MONTHS . SUCH ALTERATIONS OR SUSPENSIONS MAY ONLY BE EXTENDED , UNDER THE SAME CONDITIONS , FOR ONE FURTHER PERIOD OF SIX MONTHS .
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-20033

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CHRISTOPHER M. SANCHEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. CR-H-95-197-1

- - - - - - - - - -

September 13, 1996

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Chrisopher M. Sanchez appeals the district court’s

determination that his sentence for embezzlement by a bank

employee; 18 U.S.C. § 656, should be enhanced because of his

abuse of a position of trust. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.3. We have

reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and AFFIRM the

enhancement for the reasons stated by the district court at

sentencing. United States v. Sanchez, CR-H-95-197-1 (S.D. Tex.

Jan. 12, 1996).
No.

- 2 -

AFFIRMED.
# Page Not Found

### We have redesigned our site, and the page you are looking for might have been moved, renamed, or may be temporarily unavailable.

#### What can you do?

                - Visit our site's  Home  page and browse.
                - Looking for an Information Browser Tool?  Visit  Information Tools .
                - Use our  Search  tool to find the information you are looking for.
                - Visit the archives of the two previous RMA websites –  RMA Legacy Website  or  Current RMA Archive Website .  Both are no longer updated, but if you are looking for older information you may find it there.

 If you are experiencing technical issues with the site, send an email to askusda@usda.gov.

Thank you for visiting us!
§ 218.151 Effective dates and definitions. ( a ) Regulations in this subpart are effective February 3, 2023 through February 2, 2030.
( b ) In additions to the definitions contained in section 2 of the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), 16 U.S.C. 1362, and § 218.103, the following definitions apply to this subpart: ( 1 ) *GOA Study Area* means the area described in § 218.150(b).
( 2 ) *TMAA* means Temporary Maritime Activities Area, as described in § 218.150(b).
( 3 ) *WMA* means Western Maneuver Area, as described in § 218.150(b).
( 4 ) *LOA* means a Letter of Authorization issued under §§ 216.106 of this chapter and 218.156.
( 5 ) *MTE* means major training exercise.
( 6 ) *Navy* means United States Department of the Navy.
( 7 ) *Navy personnel* means active-duty and reserve uniformed Navy personnel and Navy civil servants.
( 8 ) *Navy contractor* means any individual, firm, corporation, partnership, association, or other legal non-Federal entity that enters into a contract directly with the Navy to furnish services, supplies, or construction and is performing or acting in furtherance of those duties.
( 9 ) *Lookout* means an individual designated the responsibility of visually observing mitigation zones.
( 10 ) *Training activities* means military readiness activities described in § 218.150.
× Home
      About Us
      Archives
      Events
      Publications
 Contact Us To provide feedback on the Community Policing Dispatch, e-mail the editorial board at CPDispatch@usdoj.gov. To obtain details on COPS Office programs, publications, and resources, contact the COPS Office Response Center at 800-421-6770 or AskCopsRC@usdoj.gov   **U.S. Department of Justice** 
        Office of Community Oriented Policing Services 145 N Street, N.E. 
        Washington, DC 20530 www.cops.usdoj.gov ×
 
 Home
            About Us
            Archives
            Events
            Publications
            Contact Us
 **Revised Hate Crime Data Collection Guidelines and Training Manual** May 2022 | Volume 15 | Issue 5
  In March 2022, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program completed a revision of the Hate Crime Data Collection Guidelines and Training Manual. With the transition to reporting via the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS), information for reporting hate crime data via the Summary Reporting System (SRS) was removed. The new revision also adds federal and tribal offenses and training scenarios for reporting anti-Asian hate crimes. In addition, revisions have been made to the sexual orientation training scenarios to incorporate non-binary verbiage. This publication is intended to assist law enforcement agencies in establishing an up-to-date hate crime training program so their personnel can collect and submit hate crime data to the FBI UCR Program. In addition to providing suggested model reporting procedures and training aids for capturing bias motivations, the manual is written to raise law enforcement officers’ awareness of the hate crime problem and to provide guidelines for interacting with the victims during an investigation. ***Logo courtesy of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.*** Tweet
 **Subscribe to Email Updates**
 To sign up for monthly updates or to access your subscriber preferences, please enter your email address in the Subscribe box.
 Email
 The Community Policing Dispatch is the e-newsletter of the COPS Office.   The Community Policing Dispatch is the e-newsletter of the COPS Office.
 **Explore** Home
            About Us
            Archives
            Events
            
            Publications
            Contact Us
 Connect With Us Want to stay connected with the COPS office? 
            Follow us on social media!
  FOIA No FEAR Act Open Government Plain Writing USA.gov Legal Policies and Disclaimers Language Access Plan DOJ Privacy Policy
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**130 CAF 15-01276**  PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF MADISON J.S., TYLER D.S., BENTLEY P.S., AND BROOKE R.S. --------------------------------------------- MEMORANDUM AND ORDER STEUBEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, PETITIONER-APPELLANT;

VICTORIA M. AND JASON W., RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.

CASEY E. ROGERS, BATH, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

SALLY A. MADIGAN, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN, BATH.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Steuben County (Joseph W. Latham, J.), entered July 27, 2015 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10. The order, insofar as appealed from, dismissed the petition insofar as it alleged that Madison J.S., Tyler D.S. and Brooke R.S. were derivatively neglected by respondents.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from an order that, insofar as appealed from, dismissed its petition to the extent that it alleged that Madison J.S., Tyler D.S., and Brooke R.S. (the subject children) were derivatively neglected by respondents. We affirm. Although Family Court determined that respondents neglected Bentley P.S., a sibling of the subject children, and Family Court Act § 1046 (a) (i) permits evidence of that neglect to be considered in determining whether the subject children were neglected, “the statute does not mandate a finding of derivative neglect” ( Matter of Jocelyne J. , 8 AD3d 978, 979), and “such evidence typically may not serve as the sole basis of a finding of neglect” ( Matter of Evelyn B ., 30 AD3d 913, 914, lv denied 7 NY3d 713). Because there is no evidence in the record that the “neglect was repeated . . . [or] was perpetrated on multiple victims,” and it is unclear whether the subject children “were nearby when the [neglect] occurred” ( Matter of Cadejah AA. , 33 AD3d 1155, 1157), we conclude that the court did not err in refusing to make a finding of derivative neglect.

Entered: February 11, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
EXHIBIT 31.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

I, John Haddock, as Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
Dtomi, Inc. (the "Company") certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)   the accompanying Form 10-QSB report for the period ending June 30, 2004 as
      filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report")
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Dated:  August 16, 2004             /s/ John Haddock
                                    ----------------------------
                                    John Haddock
                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                    Principal Financial Officer



                                       14
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 10
                  NAVISTAR FINANCIAL SECURITIES CORPORATION
                                            

                             MATERIAL CONTRACTS

    The following material contracts of Navistar Financial Securities
Corporation are incorporated herein by reference:


10.1    Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 1990 among
        Navistar Financial Corporation, as Servicer, Navistar Financial
        Securities Corporation, as Seller, and Manufacturers Hanover Trust
        Company, as Trustee.  Filed on Registration No. 33-36767.

10.2    Purchase Agreement dated as of December 1, 1990 between Navistar
        Financial Corporation and Navistar Financial Securities Corporation,
        as Purchaser, with respect to the Dealer Note Trust 1990.  Filed on
        Registration No. 33-36767.

10.3    Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 8, 1995, among
        Navistar Financial Corporation, as Servicer, Navistar Financial
        Securities Corporation, as Seller, Chemical Bank (Successor to
        Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company), as 1990 Trust Trustee, and The
        Bank of New York, as Master Trust Trustee.  Filed on Registration No.
        33-87374.

10.4    Series 1995-1 Supplement to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated
        as of June 8, 1995, among Navistar Financial Corporation, as
        Servicer, Navistar Financial Securities Corporation, as Seller, and
        The Bank of New York, as Master Trust Trustee on behalf of the Series
        1995-1 Certificateholders.  Filed on Registration No. 33-87374.

10.5    Class A-4 Supplement to the 1990 Pooling and Servicing Agreement
        dated June 8, 1995, among Navistar Financial Corporation, as
        Servicer, Navistar Financial Securities Corporation, as Seller, and
        Chemical Bank (Successor to Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company), as
        Trustee.  Filed on Registration No. 33-87374.

10.6    Purchase Agreement dated as of June 8, 1995, between Navistar
        Financial Corporation and Navistar Financial Securities Corporation,
        as Purchaser, with respect to the Dealer Note Master Trust.  Filed on
        Registration No. 33-87374.