alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

            DECISION No 5/2005 OF THE EC-EFTA JOINT COMMITTEE ON COMMON TRANSIT                     

of 4 October 2005         

inviting Romania to accede to the Convention of 20 May 1987 on a common transit procedure

(2005/712/EC)

THE JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Convention of 20 May 1987 on a common transit procedure (1) (hereinafter referred to as the Convention), and in particular Article 15(3)(e) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

In accordance with Article 15a of the Convention, Romania is invited, in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the Council of the European Union and Romania attached to this Decision, to accede to the Convention as from 1 January 2006.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Basel, 4 October 2005.

For the Joint Committee

The President

Rudolf DIETRICH            

----

(1)OJ L 226, 13.8.1987, p. 2. Convention as last amended by Decision No 4/2005 (OJ L 225, 31.8.2005, p. 29).

----

Sir,

I have the honour to inform you of the Decision No 5/2005 of the EC-EFTA Joint Committee on common transit of 4 October 2005 inviting Romania to become a Contracting Party to the Convention of 20 May 1987 on a common transit procedure.

The accession of Romania to the Convention may be effected by lodging its Instrument of Accession with the General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union together with a translation of the Convention in the official language of Romania in accordance with Article 15a of the Convention.

Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration.

The General Secretary

General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union

Romania,

Taking note of the Decision No 5/2005 of the EC-EFTA Joint Committee on common transit of 4 October 2005 inviting Romania to accede to the Convention of 20 May 1987 on a common transit procedure,

Desiring to become a Contracting Party to the Convention,

HEREBY

Accedes to the Convention;

Attaches to this Instrument a translation of the Convention in the official language of Romania;

Declares that it accepts all the Recommendations and Decisions of the EC-EFTA Joint Committee on common transit adopted between the 4 October 2005 and the date on which the Accession of Romania becomes effective in accordance with Article 15a of the Convention.

Done at ...

For Romania

----
EXHIBIT 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Medical  Makeover  Corporation  of
America (the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending  September 30, 2005
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Periodic Report"), I, Stephen H Durland, Acting Chief Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18.U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Periodic  Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



    /s/    Stephen H Durland
    --------------------------------
    Stephen H Durland
    Acting Chief Accounting Officer
    September 12, 2005







--------------------
This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
#### § 27.83 Indecency and disorderly conduct.

Any act of indecency or disorderly conduct as defined by State or local laws is prohibited on any national wildlife refuge.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4443 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

In re the Marriage of:

DAVINA ATTAR-WILLIAMS,

 

 Petitioner/Appellant,

 and

STEVEN THOMAS WILLIAMS,

 Respondent/Appellee.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CAUSE NO. DA 23-0120

ORDER

 

Upon motion of Appellant Davina Attar-Williams, the Court orders transferred 

to Cause No. DA 23-0120 the following transcripts from proceedings heard in the 

Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County, Cause No. DR 19-0893. 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2019

NOVEMBER 13, 2019

JUNE 2, 2020

JULY 17, 2020

AUGUST 3, 2020

AUGUST 14, 2020

NOVEMBER 9, 2020

FEBRUARY 16, 2021

MAY 26, 2021

JUNE 18, 2021

NOVEMBER 3, 2021

03/23/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0120
2

 

OCTOBER 12, 2022

OCTOBER 21, 2022

NOVEMBER 16, 2022

DECEMBER 19, 2022

JANUARY 20, 2023

The Clerk is directed to transfer into Montana Supreme Court Cause No. DA 23-

0120 these transcripts as set forth above. 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 23 2023
EXHBIT  32.2
------------

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO
18  U.S.C.  SECTION  1350,
AS  ADOPTED  PURSUANT  TO
SECTION  906  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Pacific  Peak Investments (the
"Company")  on  Form  10-Q  for  the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed  with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date hereof (the "Report"),
Bernard  Gurr,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company, certifies to the  best
of  his  knowledge,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to  ss.
906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  the
Company.



              /s/  Bernard  Gurr
              -----------------------------
              Bernard  Gurr
              Chief  Financial  Officer
              August  10,  2005
Editorial Note on Part 622
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 622 appear at 79 FR 57837, Sept. 26, 2014 and at 81 FR 32253, May 23, 2016.

§ 622.75 Harvest limitations. ( a ) *Aquacultured live rock.* In the Gulf EEZ: ( 1 ) Aquacultured live rock may be harvested only under a permit, as required under § 622.70(a)(2), and aquacultured live rock on a site may be harvested only by the person, or his or her employee, contractor, or agent, who has been issued the aquacultured live rock permit for the site. A person harvesting aquacultured live rock is exempt from the prohibition on taking prohibited coral for such prohibited coral as attaches to aquacultured live rock.
( 2 ) The following restrictions apply to individual aquaculture activities: ( i ) No aquaculture site may exceed 1 acre (0.4 ha) in size.
( ii ) Material deposited on the aquaculture site— ( A ) May not be placed over naturally occurring reef outcrops, limestone ledges, coral reefs, or vegetated areas.
( B ) Must be free of contaminants.
( C ) Must be nontoxic.
( D ) Must be placed on the site by hand or lowered completely to the bottom under restraint, that is, not allowed to fall freely.
( E ) Must be placed from a vessel that is anchored.
( F ) Must be distinguishable, geologically or otherwise (for example, be indelibly marked or tagged), from the naturally occurring substrate.
( iii ) A minimum setback of at least 50 ft (15.2 m) must be maintained from natural vegetated or hard bottom habitats.
( 3 ) Mechanically dredging or drilling, or otherwise disturbing, aquacultured live rock is prohibited, and aquacultured live rock may be harvested only by hand.
( 4 ) Not less than 24 hours prior to harvest of aquacultured live rock, the owner or operator of the harvesting vessel must provide the following information to the NMFS Office for Law Enforcement, Southeast Region, St. Petersburg, FL, by telephone (727-824-5344): ( i ) Permit number of site to be harvested and date of harvest.
( ii ) Name and official number of the vessel to be used in harvesting.
( iii ) Date, port, and facility at which aquacultured live rock will be landed.
( b ) [Reserved]
# EUR-Lex - 11957E085 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957E085

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY, PART THREE - POLICY OF THE COMMUNITY, TITLE I - COMMON RULES, CHAPTER 1: RULES ON COMPETITION, SECTION 1: RULES APPLYING TO UNDERTAKINGS, ARTICLE 85 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 85

1 . THE FOLLOWING SHALL BE PROHIBITED AS INCOMPATIBLE WITH THE COMMON MARKET : ALL AGREEMENTS BETWEEN UNDERTAKINGS , DECISIONS BY ASSOCIATIONS OF UNDERTAKINGS AND CONCERTED PRACTICES WHICH MAY AFFECT TRADE BETWEEN MEMBER STATES AND WHICH HAVE AS THEIR OBJECT OR EFFECT THE PREVENTION , RESTRICTION OR DISTORTION OF COMPETITION WITHIN THE COMMON MARKET , AND IN PARTICULAR THOSE WHICH :

( A ) DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY FIX PURCHASE OR SELLING PRICES OR ANY OTHER TRADING CONDITIONS ;

( B ) LIMIT OR CONTROL PRODUCTION , MARKETS , TECHNICAL DEVELOPMENT , OR INVESTMENT ;

( C ) SHARE MARKETS OR SOURCES OF SUPPLY :

( D ) APPLY DISSIMILAR CONDITIONS TO EQUIVALENT TRANSACTIONS WITH OTHER TRADING PARTIES , THEREBY PLACING THEM AT A COMPETITIVE DISADVANTAGE ;

( E ) MAKE THE CONCLUSION OF CONTRACTS SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE OTHER PARTIES OF SUPPLEMENTARY OBLIGATIONS WHICH , BY THEIR NATURE OR ACCORDING TO COMMERCIAL USAGE , HAVE NO CONNECTION WITH THE SUBJECT OF SUCH CONTRACTS .

2 . ANY AGREEMENTS OR DECISIONS PROHIBITED PURSUANT TO THIS ARTICLE SHALL BE AUTOMATICALLY VOID .

3 . THE PROVISIONS OF PARAGRAPH 1 MAY , HOWEVER , BE DECLARED INAPPLICABLE IN THE CASE OF :

- ANY AGREEMENT OR CATEGORY OF AGREEMENTS BETWEEN UNDERTAKINGS ;

- ANY DECISION OR CATEGORY OF DECISIONS BY ASSOCIATIONS OF UNDERTAKINGS ;

- ANY CONCERTED PRACTICE OR CATEGORY OF CONCERTED PRACTICES ;

WHICH CONTRIBUTES TO IMPROVING THE PRODUCTION OR DISTRIBUTION OF GOODS OR TO PROMOTING TECHNICAL OR ECONOMIC PROGRESS , WHILE ALLOWING CONSUMERS A FAIR SHARE OF THE RESULTING BENEFIT , AND WHICH DOES NOT :

( A ) IMPOSE ON THE UNDERTAKINGS CONCERNED RESTRICTIONS WHICH ARE NOT INDISPENSABLE TO THE ATTAINMENT OF THESE OBJECTIVES ;

( B ) AFFORD SUCH UNDERTAKINGS THE POSSIBILITY OF ELIMINATING COMPETITION IN RESPECT OF A SUBSTANTIAL PART OF THE PRODUCTS IN QUESTION .
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-119844, 333-90746, 333-73445and 333-67766) pertaining to the Trikon Technologies, Inc. employee benefit plans listed on the facing sheets thereof and in the Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-110381, 333-101181, 333-87486 and 333-63640) and related Prospectus of TrikonTechnologies, Inc. of our report dated March 15, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Trikon Technologies, Inc., Trikon Technologies, Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Trikon Technologies, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K), for the year ended December 31, 2004. 

 

/s/    ERNST &YOUNG LLP         

 

Ernst& Young LLP 

Bristol, England 

 

March 15, 2005
2023 COPS Office Blue Alert Program Awards 

State Recipient Award Amount 

District of Columbia National Fraternal Order of Police Foundation $130,000
EXHIBIT
31.2: Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications





I, Ding
Rencai, certify that:





1.  I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of China Water Group,
Inc.;




2.  Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.   Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;




4.  The
Company’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have:




a)     Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to ensure that
material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this  report is being
prepared;




b)  Evaluated
the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




c)   Disclosed
in this report any change in the Company’s internal controls over financial
reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the Company's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.  The
issuer’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the
Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the issuer’s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):




a)  All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and




b)  Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the smaller reporting company’s internal controls
over financial reporting.




Date:
      March 30, 2009
              /s/ Ding RencaiDing
      Rencai, Chief Financial
Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-10550

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GABRIEL CARDENAS-RICHAR,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:97-CR-73-ALL

- - - - - - - - - -

December 10, 1998

Before DAVIS, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Gabriel Cardenas-Richar appeals his sentence for illegal

reentry after deportation, a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He

contends that he should have been awarded a reduction for

acceptance of responsibility, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1. 

Because Cardenas did not object to the findings in the

presentence report or to the court’s reliance on those findings

at sentencing, appellate review is for plain error. See United

States v. McCaskey, 9 F.3d 368, 376 (5th Cir. 1993). 
No. 98-10550

-2-

Although Cardenas has admitted the factual elements of the

crime charged, he did not present any legal argument that did not

relate to factual guilt. See, e.g., United States v. Fells, 78

F.3d 168, 171-72 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 117 S.Ct. 134 (1996);

United States v. Broussard, 987 F.2d 215, 224 (5th Cir. 1993). 

Cardenas has failed to show that the district court plainly

erred in its failure to award a reduction for acceptance of

responsibility. 

AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6089
DANNY ALAN VESTAL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BILL CLINTON; JAMES B. HUNT, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Salisbury. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-752) Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: May 21, 1996 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Danny Alan Vestal, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Vestal v. Clinton , No. CA-95-752 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 9, 1996). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case 16-26724 Doc 1 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 15:22:25 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 10
Case 16-26724 Doc 1 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 15:22:25 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 10
Case 16-26724 Doc 1 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 15:22:25 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 10
Case 16-26724 Doc 1 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 15:22:25 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 10
Case 16-26724 Doc 1 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 15:22:25 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 10
Case 16-26724 Doc 1 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 15:22:25 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 10
Case 16-26724 Doc 1 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 15:22:25 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 10
Case 16-26724 Doc 1 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 15:22:25 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 10
Case 16-26724 Doc 1 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 15:22:25 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 10
Case 16-26724 Doc 1 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 15:22:25 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 10
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.8


SUMMARY OF BOARD FEES


<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                                        Effective
                                                                                      June 1, 2005
            --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                                   <C>
            CASH COMPENSATION
            BOARD MEETINGS
            Annual Retainer Fee                                                          $8,000
            Meeting Fee (attended in person)                                             $1,000
            Meeting Fee (attended by telephone)                                           $400

            COMMITTEE COMPENSATION
            AUDIT
            Chairman Retainer                                                            $4,000
            Chairman Meeting Fee (A)                                                    $400 (B)
            Committee Member Meeting Fee (A)                                              $400
            COMPENSATION
            Chairman Retainer                                                            $2,000
            Chairman Meeting Fee (A)                                                      $400
            Committee Member Meeting Fee (A)                                              $400

            EQUITY COMPENSATION (C)                                                      limited
</Table>


(A) If meeting is not held substantially simultaneously with a board, or another
    committee, meeting.

(B) To include formal conference calls with accountants/management regarding SEC
    filings.

(C) Currently, directors are eligible for participation in the 1999 Option Plan,
    which participation was proposed in 1999 in lieu of an increase in cash fees
    in that year. Each option vests one third annually, on the anniversary date
    of the grant, and expires ten years after the grant. Under the proposed 2005
    Stock Incentive Plan, if adopted by shareholders, awards of options or
    restricted stock to non-employee directors would be available but limited as
    provided in the 2005 Plan.




                                     PAGE 1
## REPORT AMENDMENT NUMBER 1

Study T i tle 

## EVALUATION OF THE MUTAGENIC ACTIVITY OF EXP1313100

IN THE SALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM 

## REVERSE MUTATION ASSAY AND THE ESCHERICHIA COLI 

## REVERSE MUTATION ASSAY

Sponsor

Test Faci li ty WI L Research E u rope B.V. Hambakenweteri ng 

### 7 523 1 DD ' s - Hertogenbosc h T he Neth erl ands Laboratory Project Identifi cati on 

### Project 505689 Substan ce 205622/A

- Page 1 of 3 -EXP1313100 Project 505689 AMENDMEN T DESCRIPT I O N CO N CERNING Page 30, Append ix 6. Paragraph title: Certificate of ana lysis . REASON FOR AM E NDMEN T A new cert i ficate of ana lys i s was provided by the sponsor .
APPROVAL

This report a mendment has been audited by the Qua li ty Assurance Un it.

Proj ect 505689 Sta rt E n d Type of I n s p ecti o n In s p e ction Report i ng In s p ec t i o n s P h as e/ P r oces s date da te date S t udy Report Amendment 01 2 1 -0ct-2014 21-0ct -20 1 4 2 1 -0ct-2014 The review of t he final report amendment was completed on t he date of signing this QA statem en t. Qua l ity Assurance

- Page 2 of 3 -

### EXP13 1 3100 Project 505689 APPENDIX 6 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Create PDF m es without this mcsssge by purchasing novaPDF p ri nter (h ttp :/lwww.novapdl . co m )



### Final Report - Page 30 -
Case 16-23912 Doc 1 Filed 07/26/16 Entered 07/26/16 13:19:35 Desc MainDocument Page 1 of 7Case 16-23912 Doc 1 Filed 07/26/16 Entered 07/26/16 13:19:35 Desc MainDocument Page 2 of 7Case 16-23912 Doc 1 Filed 07/26/16 Entered 07/26/16 13:19:35 Desc MainDocument Page 3 of 7Case 16-23912 Doc 1 Filed 07/26/16 Entered 07/26/16 13:19:35 Desc MainDocument Page 4 of 7Case 16-23912 Doc 1 Filed 07/26/16 Entered 07/26/16 13:19:35 Desc MainDocument Page 5 of 7Case 16-23912 Doc 1 Filed 07/26/16 Entered 07/26/16 13:19:35 Desc MainDocument Page 6 of 7Case 16-23912 Doc 1 Filed 07/26/16 Entered 07/26/16 13:19:35 Desc MainDocument Page 7 of 7
§ 30.11 Control of feral animals. ( a ) Feral animals, including horses, burros, cattle, swine, sheep, goats, reindeer, dogs, and cats, without ownership that have reverted to the wild from a domestic state may be taken by authorized Federal or State personnel or by private persons operating under permit in accordance with applicable provisions of Federal or State law or regulation.
( b ) [Reserved]
[31 FR 16027, Dec. 15, 1966]