alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5262

To amend the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act to provide for community

approval before Indian class III gaming operations may take effect.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 7, 1994

Mr. EVERETT (for himself and Mr. BROWDER) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

A BILL

To amend the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act to provide

for community approval before Indian class III gaming

operations may take effect.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. COMMUNITY APPROVAL OF TRIBAL-STATE

4 COMPACTS.

5 Section 11(d) of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act

6 (25 U.S.C. 2710(d)) is amended by adding at the end the

7 following new paragraph:

8 ‘‘(10)(A) A Tribal-State compact may not take effect

9 until after—
2

•HR 5262 IH

1 ‘‘(i) the elected governing body and elected ex2 ecutive officials (including the city council, county

3 commissioner, mayor, and similar positions) in the

4 political jurisdiction in which a class III gaming ac5 tivity under the compact is to occur have approved

6 the compact; and

7 ‘‘(ii) the compact is then approved by majority

8 vote in a referendum held in each such political sub9 division in the first general election (with respect to

10 which the filing deadline has not passed) occurring

11 after the date on which the compact is approved

12 under clause (i).

13 ‘‘(B) For the purposes of subparagraph (A), a Tribal14 State compact includes a compact approved under para15 graph (8) or consented to under paragraph (7)(B)(vi), and

16 the procedures for a class III gaming activity prescribed

17 under paragraph (7)(B)(vii).’’.

18 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

19 The amendments made by this Act shall apply to any

20 Tribal-State compact which has not been entered into

21 under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act before January

22 1, 1994.

Æ
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS43051 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
#### Wilchinsky, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. Cavender.

Relief against Mistake in Sheriff’s Sale: action against the defendant in the execution. The doctrine of *caveat emptor*does not apply to sheriff’s sales where there is a mistake made both by the sheriff and the purchaser, in selling a tract of land to which the defendant in the execution has no title. In such case since the consideration for the money paid on the execution has failed, and the money has gone to extinguish the defendant’s debt, the purchaser may recover it back from him; and it is not essential that the pur*193chaser shall have made improvements upon the land; (as was the case in *McLean v. Martin,*45 Mo. 393;) it is enough if the money has passed out of the sheriff’s hands before the mistake is discovered.

*Error to Jackson Special Law and Equity Court.*— Hon. R. E. Cowan, Judge.

Reversed.

*Bryant & Holmes*for plaintiff in error.

Napton, *J.*

We have been unable to distinguish this ease from that of *McLean v.*Martin, 45 Mo. 393. In that ease it was held that the doctrine of *caveat emptor*had no application where a mistake was made both by the sheriff and the purchaser, in selling a tract of land to which defendant in the execution had no title, and that as the consideration for the money paid on the execution had failed and gone to extinguish the judgment against defendant, plaintiff' was entitled to recover it back from the defendant in the execution. In this case the mistake was discovered, but not till after the money was paid and the sheriff had paid it over. In that ease the mistake was not discovered till the purchaser had taken possession and made improvements ; but the principle is the same, and as that decision was made upon a full review of the authorities, both here and in other states, we see no reason to disturb it. The judgment must, therefore, be reversed and the cause remanded.

The other judges concur.
June 18, 2015 

Mr. Tim Lehman 

1722 Moorland Lane 

Crystal City, IL 60014 

Mr. Tim Lehman: 

This is in response to your February 24, 2015, letter sent to the docket (No. FAA-2015-0467) 

petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for an exemption from Title 14, Code 

of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). You requested to operate a drone for aerial photography. 

The information you submitted did not comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 11.81. On 

March 31, 2015, the FAA sent you a letter stating that we were unable to process your 

request without further information. Specifically, we asked you to provide the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of 

the relief you seek. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it 

would benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

On May 12, 2015, the FAA received additional information. The FAA has reviewed the 

information and finds that you did not provide the sections from which you seek relief, why 

granting the request would be in the public interest, and reasons why the exemption would 

not adversely affect safety. 
2

Because your petition lacks sufficient information to proceed, the FAA has closed your 

exemption request. Should you wish to provide the additional information please resubmit 

your petition for exemption to the public docket. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda D. Courtney 

Acting Director 

Office of Rulemaking
§ 296.10 Agency review. ( a ) Within 30 days after the Chief, FDS, issues an initial determination, the claimant, or any other interested person who submitted evidence relating to the initial determination, may ask the Assistant Administrator, NMFS, or his designee, for a review of the initial determination.
( b ) The petitioner may submit written or oral evidence within 30 days of filing the petition for review.
### REASON FOR ISSUE: To introduce a life limit for the Nose Landing Gear (NLG) Retraction Actuator Bolt, Spacer, Sleeve, End Plate and Ball. To revise the task interval for discard task 52 − 11 − 41 − 101* (was 1500 L COMPONENT). 

### ACTION: Add the tasks that follow to the list of Chapter 32 tasks in Section 5 − 10 − 11. Replace task 52 − 11 − 41 − 101* with the task that follows: Source Document Ref. No. Chapter 5 Task No. Task Title Task Interval RBR − C700 − 301

Rev. AL 32 − 33 − 01 − 106 * (one star) Discard the Nose Landing Gear (NLG) Retraction Actuator Bolt, Part No. 1285 − 0041 (Aircraft with NHA Part No. GW311 − 1100 − 23 only) 577 L COMPONENT

RBR − C700 − 301

Rev. AL 32 − 33 − 01 − 107 * (one star) Discard the Nose Landing Gear (NLG) Retraction Actuator Spacer, Part No. 22193 − 1 577 L COMPONENT RBR − C700 − 301

Rev. AL 32 − 33 − 01 − 108 * (one star) Discard the Nose Landing Gear (NLG) Retraction Actuator Sleeve, Part No. 22195 − 1 577 L COMPONENT RBR − C700 − 301

Rev. AL 32 − 33 − 01 − 109 * (one star) Discard the Nose Landing Gear (NLG) Retraction Actuator End Plate, Part No. 22194 − 1 577 L COMPONENT RBR − C700 − 301

Rev. AL 32 − 33 − 01 − 110 * (one star) Discard the Nose Landing Gear (NLG) Retraction Actuator Ball, Part No. 22407 − 1 (Aircraft with NHA Part No. GW311 − 1100 − 23 only) 577 L COMPONENTSep 09/20145−10−11Page 1 of 2PART 2TR 5−2−10GL 5000 FEATURING GLOBAL VISION FLIGHT DECK−TIME LIMITS/MAINTENANCE CHECKS TEMPORARY REVISION NO. 5 − 2 − 10 INSERT IN SECTION 5 − 10 − 11 FACING PAGE 3

NOTE: Remove existing Temporary Revision 5 − 2 − 9 and replace with this Temporary Revision 5 − 2 − 10. Record the removal of Temporary Revision 5 − 2 − 9 and the incorporation of this Temporary Revision on the yellow RECORD OF TEMPORARY REVISIONS sheet at the front of this manual and LIST OF EFFECTIVE TEMPORARY REVISIONS sheet at the front of Part 2.EFFECTIVITY: ALLSource Document Ref. No. Chapter 5 Task No. Task Title Task Interval RBR − C700 − 301

Rev. AK − 1 52 − 11 − 41 − 101 * (one star) Discard the Passenger Door Tensator Spring, Part No. GS321 − 0580 − 1 PHASE − IN: For aircraft with passenger door tensator springs with more than 550 Landings COMPONENT, as of the date of TL/MC Temporary Revision 5 − 2 − 9 (Jun 04/2014), this task must be accomplished within 6 Months from the date of TR 5 − 2 − 9 or 1500 Landings COMPONENT, whichever comes first. 650 L COMPONENTSep 09/20145−10−11Page 2 of 2PART 2TR 5−2−10GL 5000 FEATURING GLOBAL VISION FLIGHT DECK−TIME LIMITS/MAINTENANCE CHECKSEFFECTIVITY: ALL
# EUR-Lex - 11992E119 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11992E119

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY - TITLE VIII: SOCIAL POLICY EDUCATION VOCATIONAL TRAINING AND YOUTH - CHAPTER 1 : SOCIAL PROVISIONS - ARTICLE 119 /* CODIFIED VERSION OF THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY */ **

*
Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0045 *

Article 119

Each Member State shall during the first stage ensure and subsequently maintain the application of the principle that men and women should receive equal pay for equal work.

For the purpose of this Article, 'pay' means the ordinary basic or minimum wage or salary and any other consideration, whether in cash or in kind, which the worker receives, directly or indirectly, in respect of his employment from his employer.

Equal pay without discrimination based on sex means:

(a) that pay for the same work at piece rates shall be calculated on the basis of the same unit of measurement;

(b) that pay for work at time rates shall be the same for the same job.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **1 -**  **667 3** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , P laintiff

- Appell ee ,
v. RICARDO M. SUGGS, JR. , Defendant

– Appell ant .

Appeal from the United States District Court for the North e rn District of West Virginia , at Wheeling
. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr. , Senior District Judge. ( 5:06

- cr - 00027

- FPS

- DJJ

- 1; 5:09

- cv 00057

- FPS

- DJJ )

Submitted : September 27, 2011 Decided: September 29, 2011

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS , Circuit Judge s.

Dismiss ed by unpublished per curiam opinion
. Ricardo M. Suggs, Jr., Appellant Pro Se
. David J. Perri, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Ricardo M. Su ggs, Jr. seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2011) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or j udge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court d enies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Mi ller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the deni al of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently review ed the record and conclude that Suggs has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0017Building Strong Police-Immigrant Community Relations: Lessons from a New York City ProjectThis document describes a COPS-funded project with the Vera Institute of Justice, who worked in conjunction with the New York City Police Department (NYPD) to strengthen relations between police and new immigrant communities. Police officials met with members of three immigrant communities in a series of forums to discuss barriers to trust, strategies for building better police-community relations, and broader policy concerns affecting the police-community relationship. The report will assist police departments, local-level government officials, and community groups interested in building good relations between the police and immigrant communities.By Anita Khashu, Robin Busch, Zainab LatifCategories: Community Partnerships • New Immigrant CommunitiesLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0017Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Aug 2005Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 02:23 (UTC-5) in 0.19 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
# EUR-Lex - 11992M/PRO/CC/00 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11992M/PRO/CC/00

**Treaty on European Union - Protocol on the convergence criteria referred to in Article 109 J.of the Treaty establishing the European Community **

*
Official Journal C 191 , 29/07/1992 P. 0085 *

PROTOCOL on the convergence criteria referred to in Article 109j of the Treaty establishing the European Community

THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES,

DESIRING to lay down the details of the convergence criteria which shall guide the Community in taking decisions on the passage to the third stage of economic and monetary union, referred to in Article 109j(1) of this Treaty,

HAVE AGREED upon the following provisions, which shall be annexed to the Treaty establishing the European Community:
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 176 (Tuesday, September 12, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 53652]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7595]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Mendocino Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Mendocino County Resource Advisory Committee will meet 
September 15, 2006 (RAC) in Willits, California. Agenda items to be 
covered include: (1) Approval of minutes; (2) Handout Discussions, (3) 
Public Comment, (4) Financial Report, (5) Sub-committees, (6) Matters 
before the group, (7) Discussion--Approval of projects, (8) Next agenda 
and meeting date.

DATES: The meeting will be held on September 15, 2006, from 9 a.m. 
until 12 noon.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Mendocino County Museum, 
located at 400 E. Commercial St., Willits, California.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roberta Hurt, Committee Coordinator, 
USDA, Mendocino National Forest, Covelo Ranger District, 78150 Covelo 
Road, Covelo, CA 95428. (707) 983-8503; e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bfcdd7cacdcbffd9cc91d9dadb91cacc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1f6d776a6d6b5f796c31797a7b316a6c">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Persons 
who wish to bring matters to the attention of the Committee may file 
written statements with the Committee staff by September 12, 2006. 
Public comment will have the opportunity to address the committee at 
the meeting.

    Dated: September 4, 2006.
Blaine Baker,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 06-7595 Filed 9-11-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Map            Central Africa.
# EUR-Lex - 11951K005 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11951K005

**Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community - Title I - The European Coal and Steel Community - Article 5 **

*

*

Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community - TITLE I - The European Coal and Steel Community - Article 5

The Community shall carry out its task in accordance with this Treaty, with a limited measure of intervention.

To this end the Community shall:

- provide guidance and assistance for the parties concerned, by obtaining information, organizing consultations and laying down general objectives;

- place financial resources at the disposal of undertakings for their investment and bear part of the cost of readaptation;

- ensure the establishment, maintenance and observance of normal competitive conditions and exert direct influence upon production or upon the market only when circumstances so require;

- publish the reasons for its actions and take the necessary measures to ensure the observance of the rules laid down in this Treaty.

The institutions of the Community shall carry out these activities with a minimum of administrative machinery and in close cooperation with the parties concerned.
No. 11-5733.

#### Coates *v.*Powell et al.

C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Case 16-28584 Doc 6 Filed 09/07/16 Entered 09/07/16 10:21:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-28584 Doc 6 Filed 09/07/16 Entered 09/07/16 10:21:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 23


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-21287) pertaining to the 1996 Stock Incentive Plan of
International Telecommunication Data Systems, Inc. and in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-21283) pertaining to the 1996 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan of International Telecommunication Data Systems, Inc. of our
report dated February 10, 1998, except for information describing the 3 for 2
stock split in Note 1 and Note 3, as to which the date is February 23, 1998,
with respect to the financial statements of International Telecommunication Data
Systems, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1997.



                                                     /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Stamford, Connecticut
March 6, 1998
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 184 (Friday, September 22, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55498-55499]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8084]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552(b)(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Initial Review Group, Biomedical Research Review 
Subcommittee.
    Date: October 12-13, 2006.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Sathasiva B. Kandasamy, Phd, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Scientific Affairs, National Institute on 
Alcohol Abuse & Alcoholism, Extramural Review Branch, 5635 Fishers 
Lane, Bethesda, MD 20892-9304, (301) 443-2861, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7c0f171d12181d0f1d3c111d151052121514521b130a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f0839b919e94918391b09d91999cde9e9998de979f86">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, Alcohol 
Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


[[Page 55499]]


    Dated: September 15, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-8084 Filed 9-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Case 16-26876 Doc 1 Filed 08/22/16 Entered 08/22/16 13:25:13 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 11
Case 16-26876 Doc 1 Filed 08/22/16 Entered 08/22/16 13:25:13 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 11
Case 16-26876 Doc 1 Filed 08/22/16 Entered 08/22/16 13:25:13 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 11
Case 16-26876 Doc 1 Filed 08/22/16 Entered 08/22/16 13:25:13 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 11
Case 16-26876 Doc 1 Filed 08/22/16 Entered 08/22/16 13:25:13 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 11
Case 16-26876 Doc 1 Filed 08/22/16 Entered 08/22/16 13:25:13 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 11
Case 16-26876 Doc 1 Filed 08/22/16 Entered 08/22/16 13:25:13 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 11
Case 16-26876 Doc 1 Filed 08/22/16 Entered 08/22/16 13:25:13 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 11
Case 16-26876 Doc 1 Filed 08/22/16 Entered 08/22/16 13:25:13 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 11
Case 16-26876 Doc 1 Filed 08/22/16 Entered 08/22/16 13:25:13 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 11
Case 16-26876 Doc 1 Filed 08/22/16 Entered 08/22/16 13:25:13 Desc Main

 Document Page 11 of 11
**Docket Number FAA -**  **2014 -**  **0453**