alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF


CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of I/OMagic Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:




1.           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Dated:  July 30, 2010
By:
/s/ TONY SHAHBAZTony ShahbazChief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)and Acting Chief Financial Officer (principalfinancial officer)




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Homes for Birds
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 16.1

                    [PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Letterhead]

March 30, 2005

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Commissioners:

We have read the statements  made by The Quigley  Corporation  (copy  attached),
which we understand  will be filed with the  Commission,  pursuant to Regulation
S-K Item 304, as part of the Company's Form 10-K report dated March 31, 2005. We
agree with the statements concerning our Firm in such Form 10-K.

Very truly yours,

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
```
# EUR-Lex - 11992M/PRO/F - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11992M/PRO/F

**Treaty on European Union - Protocol on France **

*
Official Journal C 191 , 29/07/1992 P. 0090 *

PROTOCOL on France

THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES,

DESIRING to take into account a particular point relating to France,

HAVE AGREED upon the following provisions, which shall be annexed to the Treaty establishing the European Community:

France will keep the privilege of monetary emission in its overseas territories under the terms established by its national laws, and will be solely entitled to determine the parity of the CFP franc.
----

            DECISION No 1554/2005/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL         

of 7 September 2005         

amending Council Decision 2001/51/EC establishing a programme relating to the Community framework strategy on gender equality and Decision No 848/2004/EC establishing a Community action programme to promote organisations active at European level in the field of equality between men and women

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 13(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty (1),

Whereas:

HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Decision 2001/51/EC is hereby amended as follows:

Article 2

Decision No 848/2004/EC is hereby amended as follows:

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Article 4

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Strasbourg, 7 September 2005.

For the European Parliament

The President

J. BORREL FONTELLES            

For the Council

The President

C. CLARKE            

----

(1)  Opinion of the European Parliament of 26 May 2005 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and Council Decision of 12 July 2005.

(2)OJ L 17, 19.1.2001, p. 22.

(3)OJ L 157, 30.4.2004, p. 18. Decision as rectified in OJ L 195, 2.6.2004, p. 7.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and Condensed  Consolidated  Statements of
Earnings  as  reported  in Exhibit 13 of the Form 10-K and is  qualified  in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1999 
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998 
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-30-1999 
<CASH>                                         410,000 
<SECURITIES>                                         0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                  204,000 
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0 
<INVENTORY>                                  1,902,000 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,597,000 
<PP&E>                                       5,814,000 
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,588,000 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,899,000 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,491,000 
<BONDS>                                      1,222,000 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           30,000 
<PREFERRED>                                          0 
<COMMON>                                             0 
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,594,000 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,899,000 
<SALES>                                     11,170,000 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,170,000 
<CGS>                                        8,191,000 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               549,000 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              93,000 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (106,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    26,000 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (132,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0 
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                  (132,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.50)
                                       


</TABLE>
! " " # #

     
   $ %   	  & 	    	    '            %      (       

'         

) 
  *  ! + # +
Amendment to the Michigan License Agreement



 Exhibit 10.34 
 LICENSE AGREEMENT AMENDMENT 
 This is an Agreement, effective as of the 10th day of August, 1995 (the “Effective
Date”), between Matrigen, Inc., a corporation incorporated in the State of Delaware, with its principal place of business in the State of Michigan located at 425 North Main Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48104-4833 (“MATRIGEN”) , and the
Regents of the University of Michigan, a constitutional corporation of the State of Michigan (“MICHIGAN”), amending the License Agreement completed by these parties entitled “LICENSE AGREEMENT / MICHIGAN FILE NOS. 800, 800p1, 926,
926p1, 926p2, 926p3, 938, 1019 and 1116 TECHNOLOGY,” and effective as of July 13, 1995 (the “License Agreement”). MATRIGEN and MICHIGAN agree as follows: 
 Article XXIX, “Provisional Effective Period,” is hereby deleted from the License Agreement in its entirety. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement in duplicate originals by their duly authorized officers or representatives. 
  

									
	FOR MATRIGEN, INC.	 		 	FOR THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
					
	By	  	 /s/ Steven Goldstein
	 		 	By	 	 /s/ Robert L. Robb

		  	(authorized representative)	 		 		 	(authorized representative)
	Typed Name	  	Steven Goldstein	 		 	Typed Name	 	Robert L. Robb
	Title	  	President	 		 	Title	 	Director, Technology Management Officer
	Date	  	9-8-95	 		 	Date	 	9-8-95

 LICENSE AMENDMENT-MATRIGEN-9/6/95 
  

 1
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1415 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 3 ) IV-E- 3 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/15/20089:38:25 AM

Sheet 3 of 130P. 2

MEMORANDU M TO : Reinforce dPlasti c Composite s NESHA P Docke t FROM : Keith Barnet t

EPA/OAQPS/ESD/MIC G DATE : Novembe r 16 , 200 1 P A f\\r~^r-Ai' SUBJECT : Minute s o f Novembe r

16 , 200 1 Meetin g Betwee n EP A an darepresentative ofth e Reinforce dPlasti c Composite s Industry LOCATION : EP A Building , researc h Triangl e Park , N C 1:3 0 p m- 2:3 0 p m ATTENDEES : Mr . Mar c L . Fleischake r Mr . Keith Barnet t Aren t Fo x representin g Masc o Corporporatio n EPA/ESD/MIC G (202 ) 857-605 3 (919 ) 541-560 5

PURPOS E Th e purpos e ofth e meetin g was for Mr . Fleischake r

t o discus s th e curren t

thinkin g o f

EP A o n add-o n control s fo r

th e reinforce dplasti c composite s industry . DISCUSSIO N Th e EP A representativ e discusse dth e history o f thi s NESHA P an dho w w e go t t o thi s curren t position . Th e issu e ofth e 112(j ) hammer dat e wa s discussed , an dEP A gav e abrie f descriptio n o f wha t woul dhappe n at

tha t time . PE A als o referre dMr . Fleischake r t o arecentl y publishe dEP A propose drul e concernin g 112(j) . Th e nex t step s in th e rulemakin g wer e discussed , an dth e proces s tha t EP A woul dg o throug h i n decisio n making . Thi s include drevie w o f comment s an drevision s t o th e add-o n contro l costs . The n th e cos t

effectivenes s number s woul db e recalculate dan dreviewed . Th e decisio n on add-o n control s woul db e base do n thes e revise dcosts . An economi c analysi s will als o b e performe dbase d o n revise dcost s an dwil l als o b e use di n th e decisio n o n th e add-o n contro l option . A potentia l optio n base do n pollutio n preventio n (P2 ) tha t wa s considere dbut

coul dno t b e include din th e propose drul e wa s als o discussed . Thi s optio n coul dno t b e include dbecaus e it

wa s no t believe dt o mee t

th e leve l that

hadbee n determine da s MACT . Th e EP A representativ e state d tha t th e Agenc y was still intereste di n tryin g t o develo p aP 2 alternativ e t o th e 9 5 percen t contro lP. 3



### requirement , but

wa s constrainedby th e fac

t tha t w e ha ddeeme d9 5 percen

t emissio n reductio n a s MAC T an dthere wa s n

o know n P 2 option tha

t couldachiev

e thi s leve l o f control .
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              APR-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         503,279
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  720,624
<ALLOWANCES>                                   189,565
<INVENTORY>                                    321,450
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,082,424
<PP&E>                                       1,696,545
<DEPRECIATION>                                 931,121
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,661,861
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,884,703
<BONDS>                                        930,742
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,809
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,840,607
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,846,416
<SALES>                                      4,609,253
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,609,253
<CGS>                                        5,813,232
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,666,492
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                55,474
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             2,462,245
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             119,643
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,112,693)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9,112,693)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,112,693)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.62
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE> 5 
<MULTIPLIER> 1 
        
<S>                                     <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       40,522
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                               721,260
<ALLOWANCES>                                 60,000
<INVENTORY>                                  89,811
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            831,187
<PP&E>                                    1,508,265
<DEPRECIATION>                              562,295
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            1,805,017
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     1,261,309
<BONDS>                                           0
<COMMON>                                     24,103
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                   36,429
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              1,805,017
<SALES>                                   2,077,896
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          2,077,896
<CGS>                                     1,043,293
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          1,981,539
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           69,027
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (954,314)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (954,314)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                               (954,314)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.42)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service

# AGENCY:

National Park Service, Department of the Interior.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, the National Park Service (NPS) announces the availability of the Record of Decision (ROD) on the final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Stream Management Plan, Herbert Hoover National Historic Site (Site), West Branch, Iowa. The Midwest Regional Director approved the ROD for this final EIS on August 1, 2006. Specifically, the Site will adopt and implement actions described under Alternative E, the preferred alternative, in the final EIS. Under the selected action, the primary strategy entails the restoration of the function of the stream corridor and a floodwater detention area in the upstream portion of the Park.

The EIS considered and evaluated five alternatives to the selected action. A full range of foreseeable environmental consequences was assessed. The overriding concern expressed by the Site and the public during the development of this action was the protection of fundamental resources and values of the Site. Alternative E—Provide 50-Year Flood Protection—is the selected alternative since it best meets the objectives of the Site. The preferred alternative will not result in the impairment of resources and values.

The ROD includes a statement of the decision made, synopses of other alternatives considered, the basis for the decision, the rationale for why the selected action is the environmentally preferred alternative, a finding of no impairment of Site resources and values, and an overview of public involvement in the decisionmaking process.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Superintendent, Stream Management Plan Record of Decision, Herbert Hoover National Historic Site, P.O. Box 607, West Branch, Iowa 52358, or by calling 319-643-2541. Copies of the final EIS and ROD are available upon request from the above address.

Dated: August 1, 2006.

Ernest Quintana,

Regional Director, Midwest Region.

[FR Doc. 06-7715  Filed 9-15-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
exv10w15



 





Exhibit 10.15




Summary Sheet for Director Compensation and Executive Cash

Compensation and Performance Criteria Under Executive

Officers Variable Pay Plan




March 15, 2007




Director Compensation



The Company pays its Chairman of the Board an annual retainer of $60,000 and provides him office
space that has a rental value of approximately $6,000 per year. The Company pays each of its other
non-employee directors an annual retainer of $30,000. The chair of the Audit Committee receives an
additional annual fee of $15,000. The chairs of each of the Compensation Committee and the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receive an additional annual fee of $5,000.
Non-chair members of the Audit Committee receive an additional $5,000 annual fee. All director
fees are payable to directors in quarterly installments.



In addition to annual fees, each new non-employee director is entitled to receive, at or following
the Company’s annual meeting at which he or she is first elected, a one-time grant of stock of the
Company valued at $20,000. Thereafter, at or following each subsequent annual meeting of
shareholders, each non-employee director is entitled to receive a grant of stock of the Company
valued at $12,000.



The Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer is not separately compensated outside of his
employment agreement for service as a director.




Executive Cash Compensation



The following table sets forth the 2007 base salary of each of the Company’s executive officers:




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	2007 Base	 
	 	 	Salary	 
	Arthur M. Coffey
	 	$	390,000	 
	President and Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	 	 
	Anupam Narayan
	 	$	260,000	 
	Executive Vice President, Chief Investment
	 	 	 	 
	Officer and Chief Financial Officer
	 	 	 	 
	John M. Taffin
	 	$	210,000	 
	Executive Vice President, Hotel Operations
	 	 	 	 
	Thomas L. McKeirnan
	 	$	190,000	 
	Senior Vice President, General
	 	 	 	 
	Counsel, and Secretary
	 	 	 	 







2007 Performance Criteria Under Executive Officers Variable Pay Plan



On February 13, 2007, the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors established
2007 company and individual performance goals for the Company’s executive officers under the
Company’s Executive Officers Variable Pay Plan. Measured as a percentage of their 2007 base
salaries, the target variable pay available to these officers under this plan for achievement of
these goals in 2007 ranges from 30% to 60%, and the maximum variable pay available is 100% for Mr.
Coffey, 60% for Mr. Narayan, and 50% for each of Messrs. Taffin and McKeirnan.
**Exhibit 23.2**
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S CONSENT
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos.333-84425, 333-84287, and 333-27187 of National Vision, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm S-8 of our report dated May 29, 2003 (which report expresses anunqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to therestatement of the 2001 financial statements and the Predecessor Company’s emergence from Chapter11 bankruptcy), relating to the consolidated financial statementsof National Vision, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 29, 2001 (Successor Company balancesheet) and for the seven months ended December 29, 2001 (Successor Companyoperations), and the five months ended June 2, 2001 (Predecessor Companyoperations) appearing in this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Reporton Form 10-K/A ofNational Vision, Inc. for the year ended December 29, 2001.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
# EUR-Lex - 11957A111 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957A111

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY ( E.A.E.C. - EURATOM ), TITLE THREE - PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INSTITUTIONS, CHAPTER I: THE INSTITUTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY, SECTION I: THE ASSEMBLY, ARTICLE 111 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 111

SAVE AS OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN THIS TREATY , THE ASSEMBLY SHALL ACT BY AN ABSOLUTE MAJORITY OF THE VOTES CAST .

THE RULES OF PROCEDURE SHALL DETERMINE THE QUORUM .
§ 29.21-3 Nature of interest granted. ( a ) Where the land administered by the Secretary is owned in fee by the United States and the right-of-way is compatible with the objectives of the area, permit or easement may be approved and granted by the Regional Director. Generally an easement or permit will be issued for a term of 50 years or so long as it is used for the purpose granted, or for a lesser term when considered appropriate. For rights-of-way granted under authority of section 28 of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, as amended, for pipelines for the transportation of oil, natural gas, synthetic liquid or gaseous fuels, or any refined product produced therefrom, the grant may be for a term not to exceed 30 years and the right-of-way may not exceed 50 feet, plus the area occupied by the pipeline and its related facilities unless the Regional Director finds, and records the reasons for his finding, that, in his judgment, a wider right-of-way is necessary for operation and maintenance after construction, or to protect the environment or public safety. Related facilities include but are not limited to valves, pump stations, supporting structures, bridges, monitoring and communication devices, surge and storage tanks, terminals, etc. However, a temporary permit supplementing a right-of-way may be granted for additional land needed during construction, operation, maintenance, or termination of the pipeline, or to protect the natural environment or public safety.
( b ) Unless otherwise provided, no interest granted shall give the grantee any right whatever to remove any material, earth, or stone for construction or other purpose, except that stone or earth necessarily removed from the right-of-way in the construction of a project may be used elsewhere along the same right-of-way in the construction of the same project.
[31 FR 16026, Dec. 15, 1966, as amended at 42 FR 43918, Aug. 31, 1977]