alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

★

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 543

To remove the restrictions on the export of Alaskan North Slope oil.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 21, 1993

Mr. THOMAS of California (for himself, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. DOOLEY, Mr.

ARCHER, Mr. GALLEGLY, and Mr. ZIMMER) introduced the following bill;

which was referred jointly to the Committees on Foreign Affairs, Energy

and Commerce, and Natural Resources

A BILL

To remove the restrictions on the export of Alaskan North

Slope oil.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXPORT ADMINISTRATION ACT AMENDMENT.

4 Section 7(d) of the Export Administration Act of

5 1979 (50 U.S.C. 2406(d)) is hereby repealed.

6 SEC. 2. OTHER PROVISIONS OF LAW.

7 The export of domestically produced crude oil trans8 ported by pipeline over right-of-way granted pursuant to

9 section 203 of the Trans-Alaska Pipeline Authorization

10 Act (43 U.S.C. 1652) shall not be subject to the restric-
2

HR 543 IH1S

1 tions contained in section 28(u) of the Mineral Leasing

2 Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 185), section 103 of the Energy

3 Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6212), section 28

4 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C.

5 1354), or section 7430(e) of title 10, United States Code,

6 or any regulations issued under any such provision of law.

Æ
# EUR-Lex - 11997E006 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11997E006

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Amsterdam consolidated version) - Part One: Principles - Article 6 **

*
Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0183 - Consolidated version *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Amsterdam consolidated version)

Article 6

Environmental protection requirements must be integrated into the definition and implementation of the Community policies and activities referred to in Article 3, in particular with a view to promoting sustainable development.
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent
  required by 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Financial
  Officer of Jupiter Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) that, to his
  knowledge:

1. the periodic report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for
      the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934, and
2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.

|Date: November 18, 2003 | By: | /s/ Alexander Chen                     
|----------------------- | --- | ---------------------------------------
|                        |     | Alexander Chen, Chief Financial Officer

---
Case 16-25916 Doc 4 Filed 08/12/16 Entered 08/12/16 10:56:24 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-25916 Doc 4 Filed 08/12/16 Entered 08/12/16 10:56:24 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 572

AN ACT

For the relief of Melissa Johnson.
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 572

AN ACT

For the relief of Melissa Johnson.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PAYMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF CLAIMANT.

4 The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any

5 money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated,

6 $125,000 to Melissa Johnson of Barryville, New York.

7 Such sum shall be in full and complete settlement of all

8 claims against the United States arising out of the per9 sonal injuries and mental pain and suffering incurred as

10 a result of the sexual assault and molestation of Melissa

11 Johnson by an employee of the United States Postal Serv12 ice on June 3, 1982, and various other dates.
2

•HR 572 EH

1 SEC. 2. DEPOSIT OF AMOUNT IN TRUST ACCOUNTS.

2 Barbara Johnson Lizzi of Barryville, New York, the

3 mother of Melissa Johnson, shall deposit the sum paid

4 under section 1 in a federally insured depository institu5 tion in an interest bearing account or accounts in trust

6 for Melissa Johnson. Barbara Johnson Lizzi shall serve

7 as sole trustee of such account or accounts and, as such

8 trustee—

9 (1) shall pay those debts and obligations which

10 are outstanding at the time the sum is paid under

11 section 1 to the extent those debts and obligations

12 arise from the injuries and pain and suffering de13 scribed in section 1;

14 (2) shall, until Melissa Johnson reaches the age

15 of majority under the laws of the State in which Me16 lissa Johnson is residing at the time, pay, from the

17 amounts in the trust account or accounts, expenses

18 incurred for Melissa Johnson’s medical care and

19 education; and

20 (3) shall, when Melissa Johnson reaches the age

21 of majority under the laws of the State in which Me22 lissa Johnson is residing at the time, pay to Melissa

23 Johnson all amounts remaining in the trust account

24 or accounts.
3

•HR 572 EH

1 SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES.

2 Not more than 10 percent of the amount appro3 priated by section 1 may be paid or delivered to or received

4 by any agent or attorney on account of services rendered

5 in connection with the claim described in section 1, not6 withstanding any contract which provides otherwise. Any

7 person who violates the provisions of this section shall be

8 guilty of an infraction and shall be subject to a fine in

9 the amount provided in title 18, United States Code.

Passed the House of Representatives August 3,

1993.

Attest:

Clerk.
§ 35.6 Public use. Public uses of a wilderness unit will be in accordance with the purposes for which the individual national wildlife refuge was established and is administered and laws and regulations governing public uses within the National Wildlife Refuge System. ( a ) When public uses are authorized within a wilderness unit, the Refuge Manager may regulate such use. Regulating will include limiting the numbers of persons allowed in the wilderness at a given time, imposing restrictions on time, seasons, kinds and location of public uses, requiring a permit or reservation to visit the area, and similar actions.
( b ) All persons entering a wilderness unit will be required to remove such materials as they carry in.
( c ) Informational signs for the convenience of visitors will not be permitted in a wilderness unit; however, rustic directional signs for vistor safety may be installed in locations appropriate to a wilderness setting.
( d ) Limited public use facilities and improvements may be provided as necessary for the protection of the refuge and wilderness and for public safety. Facilities and improvements will not be provided for the comfort and convenience of wilderness visitors.
( e ) Public services and temporary structures generally offered by packers, outfitters, and guides for realizing the recreational or other wilderness purposes of a wilderness may be permitted. Temporary installations and structures which existed for these subsistence purposes under valid special use permit or easement when the wilderness was established may be continued if their use is necessary to administer the refuge for the purposes for which it was established and for wilderness purposes. The number, nature, and extent of such temporary structures and services will be controlled through regulations and special use permits issued by the Refuge Manager so as to provide maximum protection of wilderness resources and values.
( f ) Hunting and fishing in a refuge wilderness will be in accordance with Federal and State regulations including special regulations for the specific wildlife refuge. Hunting or fishing which requires motorized equipment will not be permitted except as provided in § 35.5(a) and (b).
#### § 217.91 Effective dates and definitions.

Regulations in this subpart are effective March 1, 2020 through February 28, 2025.
Non-Employee Director Compensation



 EXHIBIT 10.57 
 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION 
 Our non-employee directors received an annual retainer of
$150,000 and reasonable and accountable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending Board and committee meetings. Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc.’s Board of Directors has established a policy that non-employee directors will
receive 5,000 shares of restricted stock each May 1st beginning in 2006. In addition, the Chairman of the Audit Committee receives an additional $50,000 and the Chairman of each of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and the
Compensation Committee receives an additional $25,000 per year. Each member of the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee, other than their respective Chairmen, receive an additional $5,000 per year. Our Presiding Director is paid an additional
$35,000 annually.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 151 (Monday, August 7, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44697-44698]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6757]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


Sunshine Act; Deletion of Agenda Item From August 3, 2006, Open 
Meeting

 August 2, 2006.
    The following item has been deleted from the list of Agenda items 
scheduled for consideration at the Thursday, August 3, 2006, Open 
Meeting and previously listed in the Commission's Notice of Thursday, 
July 27, 2006.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1     Wireline Competition..  Title: United Power Line Council's
                               Petition for Declaratory Ruling Regarding
                               the Classification of Broadband over
                               Power Line Internet Access Service as an
                               Information Service (WC Docket No. 06-
                               10).
                              Summary: The Commission will consider a
                               Memorandum Opinion and Order concerning
                               the classification of broadband over
                               power line Internet access service.
------------------------------------------------------------------------



[[Page 44698]]

Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06-6757 Filed 8-3-06; 12:40 pm]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
exv10w7



 







Exhibit 10.7




March 16, 2007




Michele Bergerac




Dear Michele:




          [Introductory language regarding 2006 bonus results omitted. The Company undertakes to
furnish a supplemental copy of such language to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon
request.]




          The bonus plan for 2007 has been adjusted to reflect the goals for our company this coming
year. Your bonus is based on the profit after-tax using a standard corporate tax rate.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	22.5%

	 	of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of
	 	$	1,500,000	 
	30%

	 	of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of
	 	$	2,500,000	 
	45%

	 	of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of
	 	$	3,500,000	 
	65%

	 	of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of
	 	$	5,000,000	 
	82%

	 	of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of
	 	$	6,500,000	 
	100%

	 	of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of
	 	$	8,000,000	 






          In addition, you will earn 12.5% of your cumulative salary if, in my opinion, you have met the
criteria outlined in a document to be provided to you separately.




          The bonus period will be the fiscal months of February 2007 through January 2008. You must be
an active employee of Bakers Footwear Group at the time the bonus is paid to be eligible to receive
your bonus.




          We are excited about the challenges and prospects in the coming year. We hope it is
profitable for all of our shareholders and us.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Sincerely,

 	 
	 	/s/ Peter Edison

 	 
	 	Peter Edison 	 
	 	 	 
	 



ss
Case 16-81993 Doc 13 Filed 09/26/16 Entered 09/27/16 13:07:09 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
Dismissed; Opinion Filed April 16 , 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 20

- 01080

- CV
SHAMIM A. CHOWDHURY AND LIZA S. CHOWDHUR Y , Appellants V. FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSUR ANCE COMPANY AND

COUNTRYWIDE BANK, FS B , Appellees
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 19

- 07095

- D

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Partida

- Kipness, and Garcia

Opinion by Jus tice Myers Appellant s ’ brief in this case is overdue. By postcard dated March 30, 2021 , we notified appellant s the time for filing their brief had expired. We directed
appellant s to file a brief and an extension motion within ten days. We cautioned

appe llant s that failure to file their brief by that time might result in the dismissal of
this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant s ha ve not filed a brief, filed an
extension motion, nor otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of
this appeal.– 2

–

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b),
(c).

201080F.P05 /Lana Myers/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE– 3

– 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

SHAMIM A. CHOWDHURY AND LIZA S. CHOWDHURY, Appellants

No. 05

- 20

- 01080

- CV V.

FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY AND COUNTRYWIDE BANK, FSB, Appellees On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 19

- 07095

- D. Opinion delivere d by Justice Myers. Justices Partida

- Kipness and Garcia participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

.

Judgment entered this 16 th day of April, 2021.
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

June 19,2015 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Enforcement Division 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1 000 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

RE: In the Matter ofSkyWest Airlines, Inc., 

FAA Case No. 2012NM060025, DMS No. FAA-2013-0292 

BOO Independence Ave., SW. 

Washington, DC 20591 

RECEIVED 

JUN 1. 2015 

HEARING DOCKET 

Please be advised that, henceforth, I am the attorney of record for the Complainant in the 

above-referenced matter. Accordingly, copies of all documents to be served should be sent to 

me at the following address: 

Enforcement Division, AGC-300 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Fax: (202) 267-5106 

Thank you for your attention to this matter. 

s~ 

Casey E. GarJer, torney 

Enforcement Divisi n, AGC-300 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Telephone: (202) 267-5964 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on this date I have sent the foregoing entry of appearance by 

facsimile and by U.S. certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, to: 

Todd Emerson, Esq. 

Sky West Airlines, Inc. 

444 South River Road 

St. George, UT 84790 

Fax: 435-634-3505 

In addition, I certify that I have on this date personally delivered the original and one 

copy of the foregoing document to: 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl 000 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

Dated: June 19, 2015 

2
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS41696 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
Opinion filed April 2, 2015

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-15-00068-CR

__________

IN RE RODNEY EARL MILLER

Original Proceeding

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relator, Rodney Earl Miller, has filed a pro se petition in this court that 

relates to an application for writ of habeas corpus filed in the trial court pursuant to

TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2014). In the petition filed in 

this court, Relator requests that this court require the trial court to file facts and 

conclusions of law and to transmit his Article 11.07 application, along with the 

facts and conclusions of law, to this court.

1

 We dismiss Relator’s petition for want 

of jurisdiction.

According to his petition, Relator has already filed an Article 11.07 

application in the trial court. Because Relator has an Article 11.07 application 

 1

We note that Relator failed to attach any documentation to his petition in this court and, thus, 

failed to comply with the Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52. 
2

pending, we have no jurisdiction to grant the relief that he requests in the petition 

filed in our court. See Padieu v. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth Dist., 392 

S.W.3d 115, 117–18 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (indicating that the Texas Court of 

Criminal Appeals has exclusive jurisdiction when an Article 11.07 application is 

pending). We have no authority to issue writs of mandamus in criminal law 

matters pertaining to proceedings under Article 11.07. In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 

715, 718 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding).

Relator’s petition is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 

PER CURIAM

April 2, 2015

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     We have issued our reports dated April 28, 2003 accompanying the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Stellent, Inc. and
subsidiaries which are incorporated by reference or included in the Annual
report on Form 10-K of Stellent, Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2003. We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the
Registration Statements of Stellent, Inc. and subsidiaries on Forms S-8 (No.
333-11489, No. 333-66449, No. 333-66451, No. 333-90843, No. 333-47228, No.
333-47216, No. 333-47214, and No. 333-47212) and Forms S-3 (No. 333-33437, No.
333-57181, No. 333-30466, No. 333-34476, No. 333-32102, and No. 333-66094).

                                                /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
June 25, 2003
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5235

To provide a minimum for payments with respect to counties in the State

of Texas from receipts from national forests.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 6, 1994

Mr. WILSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To provide a minimum for payments with respect to counties

in the State of Texas from receipts from national forests.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Texas County Mini5 mum Payment Act of 1994’’.

6 SEC. 2. PAYMENT TO COUNTIES IN TEXAS FROM FOREST

7 RECEIPTS.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—In any fiscal year, the monetary

9 amount of the distributive share to each county in the
2

•HR 5235 IH

1 State of Texas from the payment made to the State under

2 the Forest Receipts Act shall be the greater of—

3 (1) the amount provided under the Act for such

4 distributive share to such county for the fiscal year;

5 and

6 (2) 85 percent of the amount of such distribu7 tive share to such county in fiscal year 1993.

8 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF PAYMENT TO TEXAS TO EN9 SURE PAYMENTS TO COUNTIES.—In any fiscal year, the

10 payment to the State of Texas, with respect to each county

11 in the State, under the Forest Receipts Act from receipts

12 from national forests shall be not less than 85 percent of

13 the amount of the distributive share to such county of

14 such payment in fiscal year 1993.

15 (c) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this section, the

16 term ‘‘Forest Receipts Act’’ means the last undesignated

17 paragraph under the heading ‘‘GENERAL EXPENSES,

18 FOREST SERVICE’’ under the heading ‘‘FOREST SERV19 ICE’’ of the Act of May 23, 1908 (16 U.S.C. 500).

20 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

21 This Act shall take effect on the first day of the first

22 fiscal year beginning after the date of the enactment of

23 this Act.

Æ
No. 11-6182.

#### Sawyer *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officers of Precision Optics Corporation,
Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”), do hereby certify, to such officers’ knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30,
2012 (the “Form 10-K”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.





|Date: October 15, 2012 | By: | /s/ Joseph N. Forkey                                           | 
|---------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                       |     | Joseph N. Forkey                                               | 
|                       |     | Chief Executive Officer                                        | 
|                       |     | (Principal Executive Officer)                                  | 
|                       |     |                                                                | 
|Date: October 15, 2012 | By: | /s/ Jack P. Dreimiller                                         | 
|                       |     | Jack P. Dreimiller                                             | 
|                       |     | Chief Financial Officer                                        | 
|                       |     | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) | 





A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Precision Optics Corporation, Inc.
and will be retained by Precision Optics Corporation, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
§ 219.4 Prohibitions. ( a ) Notwithstanding takings contemplated in § 219.1 and authorized by a LOA issued under §§ 216.106 of this chapter and 219.7, no person in connection with the activities described in § 219.1 may: ( 1 ) Violate, or fail to comply with, the terms, conditions, and requirements of this subpart or a LOA issued under §§ 216.106 of this chapter and 219.7;
( 2 ) Take any marine mammal not specified in such LOA;
( 3 ) Take any marine mammal specified in such LOA in any manner other than as specified;
( 4 ) Take a marine mammal specified in such LOA if NMFS determines such taking results in more than a negligible impact on the species or stocks of such marine mammal; or
( 5 ) Take a marine mammal specified in such LOA if NMFS determines such taking results in an unmitigable adverse impact on the species or stock of such marine mammal for taking for subsistence uses.
( b ) [Reserved]