alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

Allied Capital Advisers, Inc.
Exhibit 11 Statement of Computation of Earnings Per Common Share
Form 10-K
For the Years Ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                        For the Year Ended December 31,
                                                  --------------------------------------------
                                                      1996           1995             1994
                                                  --------------------------------------------
<S>                                               <C>              <C>              <C>
Primary Earnings Per Common Share:

     Net Income                                   $2,802,000       $2,435,000       $1,294,000
                                                  ============================================

     Weighted average of common
          shares outstanding                       8,990,013        8,927,648        8,846,726

     Weighted average of common
          shares issuable on exercise
          of outstanding stock options               867,600          748,674          680,537
                                                  --------------------------------------------
     Weighted average of common
          shares outstanding, as adjusted          9,857,613        9,676,322        9,527,263
                                                  ============================================

     Net Income per share                         $     0.28       $     0.25       $     0.14
                                                  ============================================


Fully Diluted Earnings Per Common Share:

     Net Income                                   $2,802,000       $2,435,000       $1,294,000
                                                  ============================================

     Weighted average common
          shares and common share
          equivalents as computed for
          primary earnings per share               9,857,613        9,676,322        9,527,263

     Weighted average of additional
          shares issuable on exercise
          of outstanding stock options                    --          124,239               --
                                                  --------------------------------------------
      Weighted average of common
          shares outstanding, as adjusted          9,857,613        9,800,561        9,527,263
                                                  ============================================

      Net Income assuming full dilution           $     0.28       $     0.25       $     0.14
                                                  ============================================
</TABLE>
# EUR-Lex - 11957E119 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957E119

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY, PART THREE - POLICY OF THE COMMUNITY, TITLE III - SOCIAL POLICY, CHAPTER 1: SOCIAL PROVISIONS, ARTICLE 119 **

*

*

++++

Article 119

Each Member State shall during the first stage ensure and subsequently maintain the application of the principle that men and women should receive equal pay for equal work .

For the purpose of this Article , " pay " means the ordinary basic or minimum wage or salary and any other consideration , whether in cash or in kind , which the worker receives , directly or indirectly , in respect of his employment from his employer .

Equal pay without discrimination based on sex means :

( a ) that pay for the same work at piece rates shall be calculated on the basis of the same unit of measurement ;

( b ) that pay for work at time rates shall be the same for the same job .
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Mobile Nation, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certify in their capacities as Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1.    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: August 2, 2007                     By: /s/ Rex Morden
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Rex A. Morden
                                             Chief Executive Officer
                                             (principal executive officer)


Dated: August 2, 2007                     BY: /s/ Chancey White
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Chancey White
                                             Secretary, Director
                                             (principal accounting officer)
# EUR-Lex - 11997D/PRO/10 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11997D/PRO/10

**Treaty of Amsterdam amending the Treaty on European Union, the Treaties establishing the European Communities and certain related acts - Protocol annexed to the Treaty of the European Community - Protocol on protection and welfare of animals **

*
Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0110 *

Treaty of Amsterdam amending the Treaty on European Union, the Treaties establishing the European Communities and certain related acts - Protocol annexed to the Treaty of the European Community - Protocol on protection and welfare of animals

THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES,

DESIRING to ensure improved protection and respect for the welfare of animals as sentient beings,

HAVE AGREED UPON the following provision which shall be annexed to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

In formulating and implementing the Community's agriculture, transport, internal market and research policies, the Community and the Member States shall pay full regard to the welfare requirements of animals, while respecting the legislative or administrative provisions and customs of the Member States relating in particular to religious rites, cultural traditions and regional heritage.
SERVED: June 24, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

JETT PRO LINE MAINTENANCE 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA 2013- 1077 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

On February 4, 2014, the Federal Aviation Admini~tration (hereinafter referred to 

as "Complainant") filed a Complaint. On January 27, 2014, Jett Pro Line Maintenance 

(hereinafter referred to as "Respondent") filed a Request for Hearing. On June 23, 2014, 

Complainant requested that its Complaint be withdrawn. 

14 C.P.R.§ 13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency 

attorney may withdraw a complaint or party may withdraw a request for a hearing 

without the consent ofthe administrative law judge: If an agency attorney 

withdraws the complaint or a party withdraws" the request for a hearing and the 

answer, the administrative law judge shall dismiss the proceedings under this 

subpart with prejudice." 

WHEREFORE, the within filed Request to Withdraw Complaint having been 

read and considered, it is ORDERED as follows: 

1. Complainant's Request to Withdraw Complaint be and is hereby granted; 

and 

2. This proceeding be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List . · 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

John Craig Weller, Respondent's ·counsel 

Aerlex Law Group 

2800 28th Street, Suite 200 

Santa Monica, CA 90405 

TEL: 530-205-9884 

FPC(: 530-205-9371 

EMAIL: cweller@aerlex.com 

Sam Nugud, President 

Jett Pro Line Maintenance, Respondent. 

8517 Earhart Road, Suite 210 

Oakland, CA 94621 

TEL: NOT PROVIDED 

FPC(: NOT PROVIDED 

Sam Nugud, President 

Jett Pro Line Maintenance, Respondent 

P.O. Box 3190 

Ontario, CA 91761 

TEL: 909-980-0552 

FAJ(: 909-980-0699 

ONE COPY 

Autumn Killingham, Complainant's Counsel 

General Attorney, Enforcement Division, 

Office of the Chief Counsel, AGC-600 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

TEL: 202-267-7728 FAX: 202-267-5769 

FDMS No. FAA-2013-1077 

(Civil Penalty Action). 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

· Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk; AGC-430. 

2 
c·.;,... 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M~20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FPCX: 202-366-7536 

3
### 7 Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2014

- 0334 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2014

- SW

- 021

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell

.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement)

Do not include on

condition cost s here Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance)

Work

- hours

(include

access, testing,

and close

- up) Labor

cost

(@$85/h

our) Parts Cost Total Costs

(labor +

parts) Number of

U.S.

Registered

Products Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### Visual inspection 1.0 $ 85.00 $0 $ 85.00 

### 822 $ 69,870.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0 .00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 69,870



### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $

On

- Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement) Work

- hours

(include access,

testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product



### Repair cracked

frame 10.0 $ 850.00 $300 $ 1,150.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      I, Dr. Dennis D. Keiser, President and Chief Executive Officer of Intrepid
Technology & Resources, Inc., (the "Company"), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

      (a) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter
ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: November 13, 2002

/s/ Dr. Dennis D. Keiser
-------------------------------------
Dennis D. Keiser
President and Chief Executive Officer
## ""0 Q) <.0 

### C1l -..,J 0 

# - -..,J
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5094 

To amend the Emergency Food Assistance Act of 1983 to provide additional 

agricultural products for distribution by emergency feeding organizations, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2024 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Emergency Food Assistance Act of 1983 to 

provide additional agricultural products for distribution 

by emergency feeding organizations, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Farm to Food Bank 

5 Reauthorization Act of 2024’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 5094 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROJECTS FOR STATES TO PURCHASE PRIORITY 

2 AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 203D of the Emergency 

4 Food Assistance Act of 1983 (7 U.S.C. 7507) is amend5 ed— 

6 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘donate’’ and 

7 inserting ‘‘donate, sell, or otherwise provide’’; 

8 (2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘donated for 

9 the use of’’ and inserting ‘‘donated or otherwise pro10 vided for the use of, or sold to,’’; and 

11 (3) in subsection (d)— 

12 (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘do13 nated’’ and inserting ‘‘donated, sold, or other14 wise provided’’; 

15 (B) in paragraph (2)— 

16 (i) in subparagraph (B), by striking 

17 ‘‘50’’ and inserting ‘‘75’’; and 

18 (ii) by adding at the end the fol19 lowing: 

20 ‘‘(D) REIMBURSEMENT FOR COSTS.—In 

21 carrying out a project, a State may reimburse 

22 an agricultural producer, processor, or dis23 tributor participating in the project for eligible 

24 costs, as determined by the Secretary.’’; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 5094 IS

1 (C) in paragraph (3)(A), by striking ‘‘do2 nation’’ and inserting ‘‘donation, sale, or other 

3 provision’’; and 

4 (D) in paragraph (5), by striking 

5 ‘‘$4,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2019 

6 through 2024’’ and inserting ‘‘$8,000,000 for 

7 each of fiscal years 2024 through 2029’’. 

8 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 202A(b)(5) 

9 of the Emergency Food Assistance Act of 1983 (7 U.S.C. 

10 7503(b)(5)) is amended by striking ‘‘donated commodities 

11 received under section 203D(d)’’ and inserting ‘‘commod12 ities received under subsection (c) or (d) of section 203D’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, David A. Jonas, Chief Financial Officer of Rochester Medical Corporation, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Rochester Medical Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date:December 22, 2005 /s/ David A. Jonas     Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 34.1

LOGO

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholder of Chase Bank USA, National Association:

We have
examined managements assertion, included in the accompanying Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria that Chase Bank USA, National Association (the Bank) complied with the servicing criteria set forth
in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Reporting Period), for all asset-backed securities transactions backed by credit card
receivables, for which transactions the Bank acts as servicer, that were registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, where the related asset-backed securities were outstanding during the
Reporting Period (the Platform), excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(ii) and (iii); 1122(d)(2)(iii) and (vi); 1122(d)(3)(iii); and 1122(d)(4)(i), (ii), (x), (xi), (xii), (xiii), and (xv), which the Bank has determined are not applicable to the
activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Banks compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Banks compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected
asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Bank processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Bank during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect
noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Bank during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Banks compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assertion that the Bank complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008 for all asset-backed securities transactions backed by credit card
receivables, for which transactions the Bank acts as servicer, that were registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, where the related asset-backed securities were outstanding during the
Reporting Period is fairly stated, in all material respects.

LOGO

March 27, 2009
#### § 260.51 Surrender of license.

Upon termination of his services as a licensed sampler or licensed inspector, or suspension or revocation of his license, such licensee shall surrender his license immediately to the office of inspection serving the area in which he is located. These same provisions shall apply in a case of an expired license.
Case 16-28950 Doc 12 Filed 09/21/16 Entered 09/22/16 09:50:42 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
Rockingham,

No. 4507.

#### Mabel A. McReel *v.*William H. McReel, *G’d’n & a.*

Argued September 4, 1956.

Decided October 31, 1956.

*Sleeper & Mullavey {Mr. Mullavey*orally), for the plaintiff.

*James C. Cleveland*and *George P. Cofran {Mr. Cofran*orally), for George R. Scammon.

Lampron, J.

Rule 73 of Rules of the Superior Court provides in part that when “a question of law is transferred, the excepting party shall advance the expense of the transfer, which sum is to be taxed in his bill of costs if he shall prevail.” 99 N. H. 620. Plaintiff’s motion that the defendant, her guardian, be ordered to advance the cost of printing her appeal to this court presented the question of whether the best interest of the plaintiff would warrant *344an expenditure of her own funds to have her exceptions determined. See *In re Estate of Ost,*211 Iowa 1085. This rested within the discretion of the Trial Court. *Merchants Nat. Bank*v. *Sullivan,*98 N. H. 151, 152. The record shows no abuse of discretion. The Trial Court’s action therefore will not be disturbed. *Sweeney*v. *Willette,*98 N. H. 512, 513.

*Exception overruled.*

All concurred.
Case 16-26219 Doc 1 Filed 08/16/16 Entered 08/16/16 11:06:47 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 9
Case 16-26219 Doc 1 Filed 08/16/16 Entered 08/16/16 11:06:47 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 9
Case 16-26219 Doc 1 Filed 08/16/16 Entered 08/16/16 11:06:47 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 9
Case 16-26219 Doc 1 Filed 08/16/16 Entered 08/16/16 11:06:47 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 9
Case 16-26219 Doc 1 Filed 08/16/16 Entered 08/16/16 11:06:47 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 9
Case 16-26219 Doc 1 Filed 08/16/16 Entered 08/16/16 11:06:47 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 9
Case 16-26219 Doc 1 Filed 08/16/16 Entered 08/16/16 11:06:47 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 9
Case 16-26219 Doc 1 Filed 08/16/16 Entered 08/16/16 11:06:47 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 9
Case 16-26219 Doc 1 Filed 08/16/16 Entered 08/16/16 11:06:47 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 9