alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Hampton Municipal Court.

No. 4570.

#### State *by Rachael H. Tucker v.*Virginia A. Gratta.

Argued June 4, 1957.

Decided June 28, 1957.

*Thomas E. Flynn, Jr.*and *Francis J. Riordan {Mr. Flynn*orally), for the State.

*Robert A. Shaines*for the defendant, furnished no brief.

Wheeler, J.

The complainant followed the not uncommon practice here of instituting a private prosecution for assault. The fine imposed inured to the benefit of the town. RSA 618:2. The practice of pursuing private prosecutions at public expense was disapproved of by this court as far back as 1827 when the court said in *Waldron*v. *Tuttle,*4 N. H. 149, 151, “If prosecutions could be commenced and pursued at the public expense by individuals whenever they saw fit, the inevitable consequence would be that the *88county expenses would be greatly augmented, the worst species of litigation be encouraged, and the means which the law affords to bring offenders to justice be perverted to the worst purposes.”

However justified the fears of the court at that time may have been that malicious and vexatious prosecutions would follow, complainants in meritorious cases would be denied simple justice, if upon a conviction of the wrongdoer, witness fees could not be allowed as in state-sponsored prosecutions. The reluctance of the public to participate in criminal trials was the subject of comment by the Judicial Council in recommending adoption of what is now RSA 592:13. Third Report Judicial Council (1950) *pp.*30, 60. This section expressly provides that “Any person who testifies as a witness in a municipal or superior court for the State shall be paid the witness fees provided by [RSA 516:16].”

If at some future time the public is faced with an epidemic of unwarranted prosecutions the Attorney General and county solicitors have the power to enter a *nolle prosequi. State*v. *Smith,*49 N. H. 155, 157.

We are of the opinion that a “private” prosecution was intended to stand no differently with respect to allowance of witness fees than one instituted by an enforcement official in behalf of a town, county or the State. See RSA 592:14.

*Exception sustained.*

All concurred.
#### § 21.10 General permit requirements.

No person may take, possess, import, export, transport, sell, purchase, barter, or offer for sale, purchase, or barter, any migratory bird, or the parts, nests, or eggs of such bird except as may be permitted under the terms of a valid permit issued pursuant to the provisions of this part and part 13 of this chapter, or as permitted by regulations in this part, or part 20 of this subchapter (the hunting regulations), or part 92 of subchapter G of this chapter (the Alaska subsistence harvest regulations). Birds taken or possessed under this part in “included areas” of Alaska as defined in § 92.5(a) are subject to this part and not to part 92 of subchapter G of this chapter.

[68 FR 43027, July 21, 2003. Redesignated at 87 FR 881, Jan. 7, 2022]
#### § 35.3 General regulations.

Rules and regulations governing administration of the National Wildlife Refuge System will apply to wilderness units where said rules and regulations do not conflict with provisions of the Wilderness Act or Act of Congress which establishes the wilderness unit.
Case 16-25116 Doc 5 Filed 08/04/16 Entered 08/04/16 14:50:12 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-25116 Doc 5 Filed 08/04/16 Entered 08/04/16 14:50:12 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1



                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Chandler (U.S.A.), Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
W. Brent LaGere, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Mark C.
Hart, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
(2) 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(3) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
(4) respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
(5) Company.



                                          /s/ W. Brent LaGere
                                          ------------------------------------
                                          W. Brent LaGere
                                          Chief Executive Officer
                                          August 12, 2009


                                          /s/ Mark C. Hart
                                          ------------------------------------
                                          Mark C. Hart
                                          Chief Financial Officer
                                          August 12, 2009

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Chandler (U.S.A.), Inc. and will be retained by Chandler
(U.S.A.), Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
# EUR-Lex - 11957A138 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957A138

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY ( E.A.E.C. - EURATOM ), TITLE THREE - PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INSTITUTIONS, CHAPTER I: THE INSTITUTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY, SECTION IV: THE COURT OF JUSTICE, ARTICLE 138 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 138

THE COURT OF JUSTICE SHALL BE ASSISTED BY TWO ADVOCATES-GENERAL .

IT SHALL BE THE DUTY OF THE ADVOCATE-GENERAL , ACTING WITH COMPLETE IMPARTIALITY AND INDEPENDENCE , TO MAKE , IN OPEN COURT , REASONED SUBMISSIONS ON CASES BROUGHT BEFORE THE COURT OF JUSTICE , IN ORDER TO ASSIST THE COURT IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THE TASK ASSIGNED TO IT IN ARTICLE 136 .

SHOULD THE COURT OF JUSTICE SO REQUEST , THE COUNCIL MAY , ACTING UNANIMOUSLY , INCREASE THE NUMBER OF ADVOCATES-GENERAL AND MAKE THE NECESSARY ADJUSTMENTS TO THE THIRD PARAGRAPH OF ARTICLE 139 .
§ 14.110 Terminal facilities. ( a ) Any terminal facility used for wild mammal or bird transport in the country of export, stopover countries, or the United States shall contain an animal holding area or areas. No carrier or shipper shall co-mingle live animal shipments with inanimate cargo in an animal holding area.
( b ) A carrier or shipper holding any wild mammal or bird in a terminal facility shall provide the following: ( 1 ) A holding area cleaned and sanitized so as to destroy pathogenic agents, maintained so that there is no accumulation of debris or excreta, and in which vermin infestation is minimized;
( 2 ) An effective program for the control of insects, ectoparasites, and pests of mammals or birds;
( 3 ) Sufficient fresh air to allow the animals to breathe normally with ventilation maintained so as to minimize drafts, odors, and moisture condensation;
( 4 ) Ambient air temperatures maintained within prescribed limits as specified in § 14.109(b).
```

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 19 (Monday, January 30, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 4967]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-761]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Finance Docket No. 34820]

Union Pacific Railroad Company--Temporary Trackage Rights 
Exemption--BNSF Railway Company

    BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) pursuant to a written trackage rights 
agreement entered into between BNSF and Union Pacific Railroad Company 
(UP) has agreed to grant temporary overhead trackage rights to UP over 
BNSF's line of railroad between Hobart Tower, CA (milepost 146.0), and 
Riverside, CA (milepost 9.8), a distance of approximately 57.7 
miles.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Total mileage does not correspond to the milepost 
designations of the endpoints because the trackage rights involve 
BNSF subdivisions with non-contiguous mileposts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The transaction was scheduled to be consummated on January 16, 
2006, but consummation could lawfully occur no earlier than January 17, 
2006, the effective date of the exemption (7 days after the exemption 
was filed). The temporary trackage rights will expire on or about March 
22, 2006. The purpose of the temporary trackage rights is to facilitate 
maintenance work on UP lines.
    As a condition to this exemption, any employee affected by the 
acquisition of the temporary trackage rights will be protected by the 
conditions imposed in Norfolk and Western Ry. Co.--Trackage Rights--BN, 
354 I.C.C. 605 (1978), as modified in Mendocino Coast Ry., Inc.--Lease 
and Operate, 360 I.C.C. 653 (1980), and any employee affected by the 
discontinuance of those trackage rights will be protected by the 
conditions set out in Oregon Short Line R. Co.--Abandonment--Goshen, 
360 I.C.C. 91 (1979).
    This notice is filed under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(8). If it contains 
false or misleading information, the exemption is void ab initio. 
Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed 
at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically 
stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 34820, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, 1925 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a 
copy of each pleading must be served on Gabriel S. Meyer, Assistant 
General Attorney, 1400 Douglas Street, STOP 1580, Omaha, NE 68179.
    Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at http://www.stb.dot.gov.

    Decided: January 23, 2006.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06-761 Filed 1-27-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
```
The only role within JustGrants that can submit an FFR is the Financial Manager. Individuals with 

that role in JustGrants should review the following helpful guidance on how to complete and submit 

FFRs in the JustGrants system. (Note: You may wish to increase the readability of the screenshots 

included below by adjusting your zoom percentage when viewing this document.) 

Are You and Your Organization Fully Set Up To Submit FFRs in JustGrants? 

• Confirm that your organization has completed its enrollment in ASAP.

o To learn more about ASAP, please review these resources.

o For questions related to the use of the ASAP system, please contact the OCFO Customer

Service Center by email at Ask.OCFO@usdoj.gov or by phone at 800–458–0786. When

contacting the OCFO Customer Service Center, please provide your organization’s DUNS

and EIN.

• Confirm that you have the correct role in JustGrants.

o IMPORTANT: Financial Managers are the only role that can edit and submit FFRs.

o Review these resources to learn how to assign roles to individuals within JustGrants.

• Confirm that you, as the Financial Manager, are assigned to the specific award for the FFR.

Finding Your FFRs

• Any FFRs to which you are assigned as the Financial Manager should populate on your Worklist

on the JustGrants Home page.

• If you cannot find an FFR in your Worklist, and you and your organization are properly set up to

work on the FFR (see above), follow these steps:
o Step 1: Click on the “Awards” tab on the left-hand menu and click on the FFR tab within the

award.

o Step 2: Find the award in the list and click on the “Award ID” link.

o Step 3: Click on the Programmatic “Begin” button. You may need to scroll down the screen.

o Step 4: Select the “Federal Financial Reports (FFR)” tab and click on the relevant FFR

number to open the FFR.
Important Reminders for Key FFR Processes

Make sure that you select the correct reporting period when opening the FFR.

• Remember: FFRs must be submitted in sequential order.

o You will receive an error message if you attempt to submit FFRs out of sequence.

o The FFR submission deadline for the period ending 9/30/20 was extended to 12/30/20.

o If you have not already submitted the FFR for the period ending 9/30/20, you will need to

submit the FFR before you can submit the next FFR for the period ending 12/31/20.

o Additionally, you may not attempt to submit the FFR for the period ending 12/31/20 until

12/21/20 (10 days prior to the end of the reporting period).

• Always report cumulative amounts in JustGrants, not the amount for the quarter.

• Cumulative reporting is new in JustGrants for Office of Justice Programs and Office on Violence

Against Women award recipients.

• You will receive an error message stating you need to add a comment if the amount in Lines 10e

and 10j are less than previously reported.

• Once you have submitted the FFR, if the status displays as ‘Pending-UFMS,’ no further action is

required on your part.

Tips for Financial Managers: Completing and Submitting Federal Financial Reports (FFR) DECEMBER 18, 2020
Case 16-28245 Doc 3 Filed 09/01/16 Entered 09/01/16 13:24:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
 8/26/16 1:06PM

Fill in this information to identify the case:

Debtor 1 Sabrina L. Barnes-Williams

First Name Middle Name Last Name

Debtor 2

(Spouse if, filing) First Name Middle Name Last Name

United States Bankruptcy Court for the: NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case number (if known)

Chapter filing under:  Chapter 7

 Chapter 11

 Chapter 12

 Chapter 13

Order Approving Payment of Filing Fee in Installments

After considering the Application for Individuals to Pay the Filing Fee in Installments (Official Form 103A), the court orders

that:

 The debtor(s) may pay the filing fee in installments on the terms proposed in the application.

 The debtor(s) must pay the filing fee according to the following terms:

You must pay... On or before this date...

$

Month / day / year

$

Month / day / year

$

Month / day / year

+ $

Month / day / year

Total $

Until the filing fee is paid in full, the debtor(s) must not make any additional payment or transfer any additional property to

an attorney or to anyone else for services in connection with this case.

By the court:

Month / day / year United States Bankruptcy Judge

B 103A (Official Form 103A) Application for Individuals to Pay the Filing Fee in Installments

Software Copyright (c) 1996-2016 Best Case, LLC - www.bestcase.com Best Case Bankruptcy

Case 16-28245 Doc 3 Filed 09/01/16 Entered 09/01/16 13:24:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

In re: 

Mia Smith

Debtor(s)

Case No. 16 B 26724

CHAPTER 13 STANDING TRUSTEE’S FINAL REPORT AND ACCOUNT

Marilyn O. Marshall, chapter 13 trustee, submits the following Final Report and Account 

of the administration of the estate pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1302(b)(1). The trustee declares as 

follows:

1) The case was filed on 08/19/2016.

2) The plan was confirmed on NA .

3) The plan was modified by order after confirmation pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1329 on

NA .

4) The trustee filed action to remedy default by the debtor in performance under the plan 

on NA .

5) The case was Dismissed on 09/22/2016.

6) Number of months from filing to last payment: 0.

7) Number of months case was pending: 3.

8) Total value of assets abandoned by court order: NA .

9) Total value of assets exempted: NA .

10) Amount of unsecured claims discharged without payment: $0.00.

11) All checks distributed by the trustee relating to this case have cleared the bank.

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (9/1/2009)

Case 16-26724 Doc 17 Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 16:46:02 Desc Page 1

 of 3
Receipts:

Total paid by or on behalf of the debtor $0.00

Less amount refunded to debtor $0.00

NET RECEIPTS: $0.00

Expenses of Administration:

Attorney’s Fees Paid Through the Plan $0.00

Court Costs $0.00

Trustee Expenses & Compensation $0.00

Other $0.00

TOTAL EXPENSES OF ADMINISTRATION: $0.00

Attorney fees paid and disclosed by debtor: $0.00

Scheduled Creditors:

Creditor

Name Class

Claim

Scheduled

Claim

Asserted

Claim

Allowed

Int.

Paid

Principal

Paid

Summary of Disbursements to Creditors:

Secured Payments:

Mortgage Ongoing

Mortgage Arrearage

Debt Secured by Vehicle

All Other Secured

TOTAL SECURED:

Priority Unsecured Payments:

Domestic Support Arrearage

Domestic Support Ongoing

All Other Priority

TOTAL PRIORITY:

GENERAL UNSECURED PAYMENTS:

Claim

Allowed

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Principal

Paid

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Interest

Paid

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (9/1/2009)

Case 16-26724 Doc 17 Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 16:46:02 Desc Page 2

 of 3
Disbursements:

Expenses of Administration $0.00

Disbursements to Creditors $0.00

TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS : $0.00

12) The trustee certifies that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 5009, 

the estate has been fully administered, the foregoing summary is true and complete, and all 

administrative matters for which the trustee is responsible have been completed. The trustee 

requests a final decree be entered that discharges the trustee and grants such other relief as may 

be just and proper.

Dated: 11/28/2016

STATEMENT: This Unified Form is associated with an open bankruptcy case, therefore, Paperwork Reduction 

Act exemption 5 C.F.R. § 1320.4(a)(2) applies.

By:/s/ Marilyn O. Marshall

Trustee

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (9/1/2009)

Case 16-26724 Doc 17 Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 16:46:02 Desc Page 3

 of 3
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer furnished pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title
18 of the United States Code (18 U.S. C. 1350)



I, Martyn
J. Tuffery, Senior Vice President and the Acting Chief Financial Officer of Trikon Technologies, Inc (the Company), do hereby certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that:



1. The Companys annual report on Form 10-K/A for the
year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 780(d)); and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  May 27,
2005



/s/    MARTYN J.
TUFFERYMartyn J. Tuffery Senior Vice President and Acting Chief Financial Officer
§ 80.1165 Assignment and use of frequencies. Frequencies for general radiotelephone purposes are available to ships in three radio frequency bands. Use of specific frequencies must meet the Commission's rules concerning the scope of service and the class of station with which communications are intended. The three frequency bands are: ( a ) *156-158 MHz (VHF/FM Radiotelephone).* Certain frequencies within this band are public correspondence frequencies and they must be used as working channels when communicating with public coast stations. Other working frequencies within the band are categorized by type of communications for which use is authorized when communicating with a private coast station or between ships. Subpart H of this part lists the frequencies and types of communications for which they are available.
( b ) *1600-4000 kHz (SSB Radiotelephone).* Specific frequencies within this band are authorized for single sideband (SSB) communications with public and private coast stations or between ships. The specific frequencies are listed in subpart H of this part.
( c ) *4000-23000 kHz (SSB Radiotelephone).* Specific frequencies within this band are authorized for SSB communications with public and private coast stations. The specific frequencies are listed in subpart H of this part.
Case 16-26836 Doc 11 Filed 08/31/16 Entered 09/02/16 09:11:36 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 178 (Thursday, September 14, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 54275]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7648]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Missile Defense Advisory Committee (MDAC)

AGENCY: Missile Defense Agency (MDA).

ACTION: Notice of closed meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Missile Defense Advisory Committee will meet in closed 
session on September 18-19, 2006, in Washington, DC.
    The mission of the Missile Defense Advisory Committee is to provide 
the Department of Defense advice on all matters relating to missile 
defense, including system development, technology, program maturity and 
readiness of configurations of the Ballistic Missile Defense System 
(BMDS) to enter the acquisition process. At this meeting, the Committee 
will conduct classified discussions on capability-based acquisition.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: COL David R. Wolf, Designated Federal 
Official (DFO) at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#81e5e0f7e8e5aff6eeede7c1ece5e0afece8ed"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1d797c6b7479336a72717b5d70797c33707471">[email protected]</span></a>, phone/voice mail (703) 695-6438, 
or mail at 7100 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-7100.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with Section 10(d) of the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. 
App II), it has been determined that this Missile Defense Advisory 
Committee meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and 
that, accordingly, the meeting will be closed to the public.
    The need to conduct this meeting was identified with less than 15 
calendar days prior to the schedule date. As a result, the meeting 
notice is being published with less than 15 calendar days notice.

    Dated: September 8, 2006.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Office, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 06-7648 Filed 9-13-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
On respondent’s motion for reconsideration filed March 30,

reconsideration allowed; opinion (127 Or App 1, 870 P2d 849) modified; affirmed May 4,

petition for review denied July 5, 1994 (318 Or 281)

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*JAMES SCOTT HOPKINS, *Appellant.*

(90-11-36303; CA A70109)

874 P2d 827

Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, for motion.

Before Richardson, Chief Judge, and Deits and Riggs, Judges.

RICHARDSON, C. J.

*624RICHARDSON, C. J.

The state moves for reconsideration, ORAP 6.25, of our opinion in *State v. Hopkins,*127 Or App 1, 870 P2d 849 (1994), in which we addressed defendant’s unpreserved error regarding his post-prison supervision term and remanded for resentencing. The state argues that we should not have reached that error and cites, *inter alia, State v. Slawson,*123 Or App 573, 860 P2d 876 (1993). Defendant’s error is unpreserved and we agree with the state that, under the rationale of *Slawson,*we should not have addressed it. Accordingly, we modify our opinion to withdraw our discussion of that error and affirm.

Reconsideration allowed; opinion modified; affirmed.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5216

To repeal provisions of the Clean Air Act dealing with stratospheric ozone

protection.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 6, 1994

Mr. DELAY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To repeal provisions of the Clean Air Act dealing with

stratospheric ozone protection.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF CLEAN AIR ACT PROVISIONS RE4 LATING TO STRATOSPHERIC OZONE PROTEC5 TION.

6 Title VI of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 and

7 following) is hereby repealed.

Æ