alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EPA Reg. No. 400-505
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95

*Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
96
97
98
99

*Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
100

*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
101
Page 102 is a duplicate of page(s) 100
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112

*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment* *Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
113

*Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment* *Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
Page 114-115 is a duplicate of page(s) 112-113
116

*Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125

*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
* Page 126 - Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
127

* Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
128
129
130
131
132
133
134

* Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
135
136
137
138

*Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
*Page 157 - Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
158
159

*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
160

*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
161

*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
162

*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
163
164
165
166

*Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
Pages 177-180 is a duplicate of page(s) 158-161
181
182
183
184
Pages 185-188 is a duplicate of page(s) 158-161
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
*Pages 197-202 - Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
203
204
205
206

*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential 

treatment*
*Page 207 - Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
*Pages 218-223 - Confidential Statements of Formula may be entitled to confidential treatment*
*Pages 224-232 - Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
*Pages 233-239 - Confidential Statements of Formula may be entitled to confidential treatment*
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
  AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by
  reference in the Registration Statements (Forms S-8 Nos. 333-90746, 333-73445
  and 333-67766) pertaining to the Trikon Technologies, Inc. employee benefit
  plans listed on the facing sheets thereof and in the Registration Statements
  (Forms S-3 Nos. 333-101181, 333-87486 and 333-63640) and related Prospectus
  of Trikon Technologies, Inc. of our report dated January 17, 2003, with
  respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Trikon Technologies,
  Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K), for the year ended December
  31, 2002.





|                  | /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
|----------------- | ---------------------
|                  |                      
|Ernst & Young LLP |                      
|Bristol, England  |                      
|                  |                      
|March 25, 2003    |                      




---
32.2     Certification
of the Chief Financial Officer of Genesis Capital Corporation of Nevada pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Genesis Capital
Corporation of Nevada (the "Company") for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned Christopher Astrom, Chief Financial Officer of
Genesis Capital Corporation of Nevada, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,


that:





(1) the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Dated:
February 19, 2008





/s/
CHRISTOPHER ASTROM


Christopher
Astrom


Chief
Financial Officer
****Editor's Roundup****
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

Section 1350 Certification

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SUNRISE REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10–QSB for the three months ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

| Date: May 15,   2006 | By:    | /s/ Lin,   Chi-Jung                      |
|----------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|
|                 |   |                                          |
|                 |   | Lin,   Chi-Jung, Chief Executive Officer |
|                 |   |                                     |
| Date: May 15,   2006 | By:    | /s/ Art   Honanyan                       |
|                 |   |                                          |
|                 |   | Art   Honanyan, Chief Financial Officer  |
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5292

To amend the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 to extend

the deadline for the submission of nominations for the Defense Base

Closure and Realignment Commission.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 29, 1994

Mr. DELLUMS introduced the following bill; which was considered and passed

A BILL

To amend the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act

of 1990 to extend the deadline for the submission of

nominations for the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUBMISSION OF NOMINATIONS FOR DEFENSE

4 BASE CLOSURE AND REALIGNMENT COMMIS5 SION.

6 Section 2902(c)(1)(B)(iii) of the Defense Base Clo7 sure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX

8 of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) is amended
2

•HR 5292 IH

1 by striking out ‘‘January 3, 1995’’ and inserting in lieu

2 thereof ‘‘January 4, 1995’’.

Æ
No. 10-10398.

#### Odom *v.*Tennessee.

Sup. Ct. Tenn. Certio-rari denied.
EX-10BI



 





EXHIBIT 10BI




AMENDMENT NO. 2

TO

BRUSH ENGINEERED MATERIALS INC.

2006 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR EQUITY PLAN




	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	Recitals
	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 





     WHEREAS, Brush Engineered Materials Inc. (the “Company”) has adopted the Brush Engineered
Materials Inc. 2006 Non-employee Director Equity Plan (the “Plan”).



     WHEREAS, with the approval of the Governance and Organization Committee (formerly named the
Governance Committee) of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Committee”) on September 12,
2006 the Plan was amended by Amendment No. 1, effective January 1, 2007.



     WHEREAS, the Company now desires to further amend the Plan (this “Amendment No. 2”) to change
the definition of Fair Market Value.



     WHEREAS, the Committee has approved this Amendment No. 2 pursuant to Section 12 of the Plan.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	Amendment
	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 





     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended by this Amendment No. 2, effective as of December
8, 2006, as follows:



     1. Section 9(b) of the Plan is hereby amended to read as follows:



     “Fair Market Value” means, as of any particular date, [unless otherwise determined by the
Committee,] the per share closing price of a Common Share on the New York Stock Exchange on the day
such determination is being made (as reported in The Wall Street Journal) or, if there was
no closing price reported on such day, on the next day on which such a closing price was reported;
or if the Common Shares are not listed or admitted to trading on the New York Stock Exchange on the
day as of which the determination is being made, the amount determined by the Committee to be the
fair market value of a Common Share on such day.



     2. Except as amended by this Amendments No. 1 and No. 2, the Plan shall remain unchanged and
in full force and effect.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	                                           /s/ Michael C. Hasychak
 	 
	 	Michael C. Hasychak 	 
	 	Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer
#### § 14.17 Personally owned pet birds.

Any person may import a personally owned pet bird at any port designated under, and in accordance with, 9 CFR part 92.
FILED

July 17, 1998

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

STATE OF TENNESSEE, )

) C.C.A. NO. 01C01-9801-CR-00034

Appellee, )

) DAVIDSON COUNTY

VS. ) (No. 94-D-1963 Below)

) The Hon. Seth Norman

JOHN GILBREATH, )

) (Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment)

Appellant. ) REVERSED AND REMANDED

O R D E R

This cause came to be heard on the motion of the state to remand this case

for a determination regarding whether the petitioner’s conviction for aggravated assault in

count ten of his indictment was the result of a clerical error. It appears from the record that

the petitioner entered guilty pleas on March 16, 1995, to several offenses. The plea

agreement and the transcript of the guilty plea hearing reflect that the petitioner pled guilty

to aggravated robbery in count ten. In contrast, the judgment form indicates that the

petitioner pled guilty to aggravated assault in count ten. However, the aggravated robbery

statute is cited in the judgment form. Subsequently, on December 4, 1997, the petitioner

filed a pro se Motion to Correct/Amendment Judgment in the trial court. The trial court’s

order denying the motion stated in part:

The defendant has submitted a transcript that shows that the

defendant pled to aggravated robbery. The judgment form as entered on the

minutes, and the minute entry, show that the defendant pled to aggravated

assault. The sentence imposed was 10 years. The defendant now seeks

to alter the judgment.

The Court is required to rely upon the minutes of the Court, not a

transcript. A Court speaks through its minutes.

As pointed out by the state, when there is a conflict between the transcript

and the court minutes, the transcript controls. See State v. Moore, 814 S.W.2d 381, 383

(Tenn. Crim. App. 1991) (citing State v. Zyla, 628 S.W.2d 39, 42 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1981)

and Farmer v. State, 574 S.W.2d 49, 50 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1978)). Moreover, pursuant

to Tenn. R. Crim. P. 36, “[c]lerical mistakes in judgments, orders, or other parts of the
-2-

record and errors in the record arising from oversight or omission may be corrected by the

court at any time and after such notice, if any, as the court orders.”

From a review of the record, it is clear that the judgment form merely reflects

a clerical error. Accordingly, we find that the judgment form and the minutes of the trial

court should be corrected to show that the petitioner pled guilty to aggravated robbery in

count ten of the indictment.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that this matter is remanded and the trial

court shall correct the judgment form and the minutes to reflect that the petitioner pled

guilty to aggravated robbery in count ten of the indictment. Costs are taxed to the state.

________________________________

THOMAS T. WOODALL, JUDGE

CONCUR:

________________________________

JOHN H. PEAY, JUDGE

________________________________

JERRY L. SMITH, JUDGE
#### § 90.655 Special licensing requirements for Specialized Mobile Radio systems.

End users of conventional or trunked Specialized Mobile Radio systems that have control stations that require FAA clearance, as specified in §§ 17.7 through 17.17 of this chapter, or that may have a significant environmental effect, as defined by § 1.1307, or that are located in a “quiet zone”, as defined by § 1.924 of this chapter must be individually licensed for such control stations prior to construction or operation. All other end users' operations will be within the scope of the base station licensee. All end users, however, continue to be responsible to comply with 47 CFR part 90 and other federal laws.

[57 FR 40850, Sept. 8, 1992, as amended at 63 FR 68970, Dec. 14, 1998]
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Siclone Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bradley S. Shepard, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







/s/Bradley S. Shepherd

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer

August 13, 2003
# EUR-Lex - 11957A187 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957A187

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY ( E.A.E.C. - EURATOM ), TITLE FIVE - GENERAL PROVISIONS, ARTICLE 187 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 187

THE COMMISSION MAY , WITHIN THE LIMITS AND UNDER THE CONDITIONS LAID DOWN BY THE COUNCIL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS TREATY , COLLECT ANY INFORMATION AND CARRY OUT ANY CHECKS REQUIRED FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF THE TASKS ENTRUSTED TO IT .
<Page>

EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

      I, Tony Shahbaz, certify that:

      1.    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of I/OMagic
Corporation;

      2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue

statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

      4.    The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [language omitted pursuant to SEC
Release 34-47986] for the registrant and have:

            (a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

            (b)   [Omitted pursuant to SEC Release 34-47986];

            (c)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            (d)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over the financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter
in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.

      5.    The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

            (a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

            (b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 16, 2007

/s/ TONY SHAHBAZ
---------------------------------------------
Tony Shahbaz,
Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            College of Information and Cyberspace
                    National Defense University
                CIC
        Search
                    Search CIC:
                        Search
                Search CIC:
                    Search
    Home

    About 
        Mission & Vision

    Faculty & Staff

    Fact Sheet

    Alumni

    Internships

    FAQ

    Admissions 
        Eligibility Requirements

    Admissions Calendar

    Application Instructions

    Apply Online

    International Students

    Academics 
        Graduate Catalog

    M.S. in Strategic Information and Cyberspace Studies
        
        JPME Master's Degree

    Cyber Workforce Master's Degree (Part Time)

    Leadership Development Programs

    Graduate Certificates

    Academic Partners

    Current Students 
        JPME II  Incoming Students

    LDP Incoming Students

    Student Registration

    Bring Your Own Device

    IA Compliance

    Completion Procedures / Order Transcripts

    Student Services and Resources

    Events
    
        Cyber Beacon

    Cyber PME Colloquium

    Hopper Award

    Lecture Series

    CYBERCOM Symposium

    NEWS

    UC2
    
        About

    Events

    Work With Us

    Center for Cybersecurity
    
        About

    Cybersecurity Center POC

    Cybersecurity Supporting Faculty

    CAE-CDE CISO Certificate Program

    Cybersecurity Trending News

    Cyber Labs
        
        Ethical Hacking

    Critical Infrastructure - SCADA

    Cyber Exercises
        
        Tabletop Exercise

    Cyber Competitions

    Cyber Resources and Awareness

    Stakeholder / Industry Advisory Council

    Contact 
        Contact Us

    Directions

    Access to Ft. McNair

    Map of Ft. McNair  Download
 Details
 Share
 News
 NSA Director Engages with Students
 General Paul Nakasone (Director of the NSA and Commander of US Cyber Command) came back to NDU and engaged with leadership and students on what the Agency is facing today and what will be needed of them after graduation. This engagement follows a pattern of increased engagement between General Nakasone, his staff, NDU, and CIC in support of their shared interest in the educational mission.
 SHARE
 PRINT
 Previous Story
 Next Story
 National Defense University


College of Information and Cyberspace

300 Fifth Ave., Bldg. 62
Fort Lesley J. McNair
Washington, DC 20319-5066

202-685-6300
                    Stay Connected
                DOD Privacy & Security
 DOD Links Disclaimer
 DOD Social Media Policy
 DOD Web Policy
 FOIA
 NDU System of Records Notice
 NDU Privacy & Security Notice
 No FEAR Act
 Open GOV
 Plain Writing Act
 Section 508
 Small Business Act
 USA.gov
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) 

Grant Payment Request System (GPRS)

Q: What is the Grant Payment Request System (GPRS)?

A: GPRS is a web-based payment request system that allows grantees to perform drawdown 

requests using the internet.

Q: What is the website for GPRS?

A: https://grants.ojp.usdoj.gov/gprs/welcome. 

Q: Is there a user guide for GPRS?

A: Yes. The user guide can be found at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/about/offices/ocfogprs.htm. 

Q: How will I register for access to GPRS?

A: Financial Points of Contact (FPOCs) can request access through a self-registration

process in GPRS.

All of the COPS Office grantees with accounts in GPRS have the role of Drawdown 

Specialist. The COPS Office grantee may request to be a GPRS Drawdown Specialist by 

accessing the GPRS website and selecting the option to self-register. After the grantee 

has submitted the request to register, a COPS Office GPRS Registrar will review and 

approve the request. After the request is approved, a confirmation email is sent to the 

FPOC with notification that the FPOC has been granted access to GPRS as a Drawdown 

Specialist. The confirmation email will include a temporary password with instructions to 

log in and create a permanent password and may take a couple of days to arrive due to 

the nature of the approval process. Once a permanent password is created, the 

Drawdown Specialist will be granted access to GPRS and will use the user ID entered 

during the self-registration process and the newly created permanent password to log into 

GPRS. 

Q: If I am a GMS (OJP/OVW) user, can I use my GMS User ID to register for the COPS

Office grants in GPRS?

A: No. You will have two separate accounts in GPRS, a GMS account and a COPS Office

account. All GMS users will register in GPRS with their GMS user ID. All COPS users will 

register in GPRS using a unique user ID that cannot be the same as a GMS user ID.

Please remember that the user ID entered during registration must be unique and not the 

same as a GMS user ID.

Q: If I already have a GPRS username, and have received a new award, how do I gain

access to my new award in GPRS?

A: Those Drawdown Specialists that have already been approved will need to request the

new award addition. Please email the GPRS Registrar 

(COPSGPRSRegistration@usdoj.gov) with your COPS username, first and last name, 

vendor number and the new award number. Please note that you will not be able to draw 

down from the new award until the signed award document has been received by the 

COPS Office. 

Q: What do I do if the Points of Contact for my grant have changed?

A: If you need to change your POC for your grant, please contact the Response Center at

800-421-6770 for assistance with accessing the COPS Office Agency Portal.

September 2014
- DE 2016