alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 999/2005

of 30 June 2005         

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of 21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 July 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 June 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1947/2002 (OJ L 299, 1.11.2002, p. 17).

----

ANNEX

to Commission Regulation of 30 June 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

----

(1)  Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 750/2005 (OJ L 126, 19.5.2005, p. 12). Code ‘            999            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

----
# EUR-Lex - 11997M003 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11997M003

**Treaty on European Union (consolidated version) - Title I: Common provisions - Article 3 - Article C - EU Treaty (Maastricht 1992) **

*
Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0153 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 191 , 29/07/1992 P. 0004 *

Treaty on European Union (consolidated version)

Article 3

The Union shall be served by a single institutional framework which shall ensure the consistency and the continuity of the activities carried out in order to attain its objectives while respecting and building upon the acquis communautaire.

The Union shall in particular ensure the consistency of its external activities as a whole in the context of its external relations, security, economic and development policies. The Council and the Commission shall be responsible for ensuring such consistency and shall cooperate to this end. They shall ensure the implementation of these policies, each in accordance with its respective powers.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                    5

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                4,892
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         1,129
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     91,922
<PP&E>                                            1,257,384
<DEPRECIATION>                                      397,683
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1,019,379
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1,596,319
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                             28,713
<OTHER-SE>                                        (605,653)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1,019,379
<SALES>                                               5,098
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      5,098
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  6,692,826
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (6,667,372)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (6,667,372)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.24)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 17 (Thursday, January 26, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 4382]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-785]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE CORPORATION

[MCC FR 06-01]


Notice of the February 8, 2006 Millennium Challenge Corporation 
Board of Directors Meeting; Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: Millennium Challenge Corporation.

Time and Date:  2 p.m. to 3:45 p.m., Wednesday, February 8, 2006.

Place:  Department of State, 2201 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20520.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Information on the meeting may be 
obtained from Joyce B. Lanham via e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#73311c120117331e10105d141c05"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="64260b051600240907074a030b12">[email protected]</span></a> or by 
telephone at (202) 521-3600.

Status:  Meeting will be closed to the public.

Matters to be Considered: The Board of Directors (the ``Board'') of the 
Millennium Challenge Corporation (``MCC'') will hold a meeting to 
discuss and consider Threshold Country Program submissions of two 
countries that are eligible for FY 2006 Millennium Challenge Account 
(``MCA'') assistance under section 616 of the Millennium Challenge Act 
of 2003 (the ``Act''); an MCC Operations update; Compact development 
issues related to MCA-eligible countries; and certain administrative 
matters. The agenda items are expected to involve the consideration of 
classified information and will be closed to the public.

    Dated: January 24, 2006.
Jon A. Dyck,
Vice President and General Counsel, Millennium Challenge Corporation.
[FR Doc. 06-785 Filed 1-24-06; 10:33 am]
BILLING CODE 9210-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 183 (Thursday, September 21, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 55204]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7922]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and AIDS 
Initial Review Group, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research 
Committee.
    Date: October 18-19, 2006.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications and/or 
proposals.
    Place: Crowne Plaza Washington Silver Spring, 8777 Georgia 
Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
    Contact Person: Annie Walker-Abbey, PhD., Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 6700B Rockledge 
Drive, RM. 3126, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616. (301) 451-2671. 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3554545757504c755b5c545c511b5b5c5d1b525a43"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9efffffcfcfbe7def0f7fff7fab0f0f7f6b0f9f1e8">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 13, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-7922 Filed 9-20-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
LNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

In re the Complaint of

PENSACOLA AVIATION CENTER LLC

Complainant,

-against- DOCKETNO. 16-12-12

PENSACOLA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT,

A DIVISION OF THE CITY OF PENSACOLA

Respondent.

Pursuant to Part 16 of the Federal Aviation

Regulations

AFFIDAVIT OF SHELLEY A. EWALT, ESQ.

1. On April 30, 2015, I searched the Florida Department of State Division of

Corporatiors' for the registration of a business named "Eric Evans Aviation LTD" or "Eric

Evans Aviation".

2. My search produced no records for a business named "Eric Evans Aviation

LTD" or for "Eric Evans Aviation".

3. Based on my search, I conclude that this company, which is referenced in the

Respondent's Reply to FAA Information Request, is not registered to do business in the State

of Florida.

4. On April 30,2015,I searched the Intemet for the website for a business named

"Eric Evans Aviation LTD". The result of that search produced a company website with an

' The State of Florida's website is located at http:l,,www.sunbiz.orq1.
Internet web address of http://wwr,v.ericevansaviation.com/. According to the website, "Eric

Evans Aviation LTD" is based in Mt. Vernon, Illinois and is in the business of aircraft

acquisition, sales and brokerage.

5. I searched throughout the various pages of the above website and did not find

any indication of a business relationship between Innisfree and "Eric Evans Aviation LTD".

Based on my search, I conclude that "Eric Evans Aviation LTD" does not provide any aircraft

sales services to, or on behalfof, Innisfree.

DATED at Trenton, thk ffiay of May, 2015.

ATTEST:

STA|E OF NEW JERSEY

COLINTY OF MERCER. SS

At Trenton, New Jersey this b day of May,2015 personally appeared Shelley A. Ewalt and

acknowledged that the above Affrdavit executed by her is true and accurate to the best of her

knowledge and belief.

Before me,

Notary

Expires: */2/? My

2
EXHIBIT 10(d)


SUMMARY
OF EMPLOYMENT INDUCEMENT AWARD

TO PETER M. RAMSTAD


On November 30,
2006, the Compensation and Human Resources Committee of The Toro Company
awarded 2,300 restricted shares of common stock to Peter M. Ramstad, Toro’s
Vice President, Business and Strategic Development.  The award terms were approved by committee
resolutions, and were not set forth in a written agreement.


The award shares
will be fully vested on the second anniversary of Ramstad’s first day of
employment with Toro.  In the event
Ramstad voluntarily terminates his employment with Toro prior to his second
anniversary with Toro for any reason, the entire stock grant will be forfeited
and the shares will be returned to Toro’s treasury account.
N. Y. SUPERIOR COURT.

#### Charles P. Currie *et*al., plaintiffs and appellants, agt. Cumberland G. White, defendant and respondent.

The following brief opinion of Judge McCmnsr in this case, should have followed the opinion of the court by Judge Freedman, on page 330, *ante.*Through some inadvertence, however, it got mislaid at that time. Rep.

*General Term, March,*1869.

McCunn, J.

This case, though very elaborately argued, is susceptible, as I understand it, of a simple solution. The contract speaks for itself. It is to sell and purchase by the respective parties one thousand shares of the capital stock of the Hudson River Railroad Company. This agreement is set out in the complaint as the foundation of the action. Neither expressly nor by implication does the contract impose on the respondent an obligation to deliver$to the appellants anything besides these one thousand shares, nor confer on the appellants any other right than to demand and receive delivery of these same shares. And surely the rights and obligations *inter sese*of the parties to the contract could not be affected by the action of strangers, *i.e.,*the Hudson River Railroad Company. Now, the respondent tendered performance of bis agreement, pursuant to its stipulations, and the offer having been rejected by the appellants, who refused to accept fulfilment of the contract actually concluded between the parties, the respondent has a right to treat the contract as rescinded, and to claim a discharge from all its obligations. On these obvious and elementary principles, I think, the judgment below may be sustained, without the necessity of recourse to inferences and distinctions, which serve rather to obscure than to elucidate the decisive point in litigation.
ODP Informational Bulletin
                 No. 00-025   December 19, 2000
                                
          TO:       State Administrative Agency Heads
          State Administrative Agency Heads Points of Contact

          FROM:     C.H. (Butch) Straub, II
          Director

          SUBJECT:  Training and Technical Assistance

On September 25, 2000, ODP sent out an information bulletin requesting that each State
Administrative Agency appoint an individual as the contact person responsible for the training
aspect of your state-wide domestic preparedness plan, and the delivery of ODP training
programs in your state.  If you have not responded to our first request please use the attached
form to convey this information to ODP.

As you know, it is the State Administrative Agency's responsibility to plan and execute a
comprehensive threat and needs assessment, and develop a three-year plan to enhance the state's
overall emergency response capabilities to terrorist events.  ODP will allocate its training,
equipment, technical assistance, and exercise resources in accordance with the state's three year
strategy.  In order to better facilitate the delivery of these programs to the jurisdictions in your
state ODP will designate a staff member to work directly with your agency to implement your
state strategy.  ODP expects to implement it's training programs, based on the submission
and review of the state strategies, beginning in Fiscal Year (FY) 2002.

Prior to the implementation of ODP training programs in FY 2002, ODP would like to
set up a process which enables it to work closely with your designated training point of contact
(POC) for scheduling requested ODP training for your state.  In order for a jurisdiction in
your state to attend a training class delivered by one of  ODP'ss training partners [Center for
Domestic Preparedness (CDP), Texas Engineering Extension Service (TEEX), Nevada Test Site
(NTS), Louisiana State University (LSU), etc.], they must provide a request to your designated
training point of contact.  Once the request has been approved by your state's designated training
point of contact, the Training POC will work with the ODP training partner who delivers the
requested training, to schedule the training at their site for the jurisdiction.  To offer all
jurisdictions the same opportunity to attend classes the ODP training partners will no longer
accept requests for training from a jurisdiction.  In the event that a jurisdiction does contact the
individual training centers, they will be directed back to your state's designated training point of
contact for approval.  This process will begin on February 1, 2000.

If you have not appointed a contact person that will be responsible for the delivery of ODP
training programs in your state, please do so as soon as possible.   Once you have appointed this
individual please use the attached form to convey this information to Darrell Darnell, Training
Program Manager.  If you have any questions, Mr. Darnell can be reached at (202) 307-6860 or
DarnellD@OJP.USDOJ.GOV
### Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection

Secretary
Mr. Shawn M. Garvin Regional Administrator Rachel Carson State Office Building P.O. Box 2063 Harrisburg, PA 17105-2063 January 4, 2011

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III 1650 Arch Street (Mail Code: 3RAOO) Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029 Dear Mr. Garvin: 717-787-2814

Enclosed for your approval is a revision to Pennsylvania's State Implementation Plan (SIP) concerning amendments to 25 Pa. Code Chapters 121 and 129 (relatingto general provisions; and standards for sources). The submittal includes two paper copies and one compact disk ofa final rulemaking that amends the existing regulation at 

### § 129.51 (relatingto general) and adds new 

### § 129.52c (relatingto control ofVOC emissions from flat wood paneling surface coatingprocesses) for control ofvolatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from flat woodpaneling surface coating processes. The requirements of§ 129.52c supersede the requirements ofaReasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) permit issuedto the owneroroperator ofa source subject to § 129.52c(a) priorto January 1,2012,under §§ 129.91 -129.95 (relating to st!ltionary sources of NOx and VOCs) to control, reduce, or minimizeVOC emissions from a flat wood paneling surface coating process, exceptto the extent the RACTpermit contains more stringent requirements. The final ru1emaking also amends § 121.1 (relating to definitions) to add new terms and definitions, and revise existing terms and definitions. This SIP revision submission includes the final rulemaking notice published in the Pennsylvania Bulletin onDecember 18, 2010 (40 Pa.B. 7224), documentation ofthe public participation process including proofofpublic notice, and the Department ofEnvironmental Protection's public comment and response document. Should you have questions regarding this SIP revision, please contact Joyce E. Epps, Director, Bureau ofAir Quality, bye-mailat jeepps@state.pa.us orby telephone at 717-787-9702.

Enclosures

An Equal Opportunity Employer www.dep.state.pa.us Sincerely,

# ~V\~ John Hanger Secretary

Printed on Recycled paper@
No. 11-5371.

#### Colon *v.*Lee, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 80.175 Availability of operator licenses.

All operator licenses required by this subpart must be readily available for inspection.
§ 95.1767 GMRS transmitting power limits. This section contains transmitting power limits for GMRS stations. The maximum transmitting power depends on which channels are being used and the type of station. ( a ) *462/467 MHz main channels.* The limits in this paragraph apply to stations transmitting on any of the 462 MHz main channels or any of the 467 MHz main channels. Each GMRS transmitter type must be capable of operating within the allowable power range. GMRS licensees are responsible for ensuring that their GMRS stations operate in compliance with these limits. ( 1 ) The transmitter output power of mobile, repeater and base stations must not exceed 50 Watts.
( 2 ) The transmitter output power of fixed stations must not exceed 15 Watts.
( b ) *462 MHz interstitial channels.* The effective radiated power (ERP) of mobile, hand-held portable and base stations transmitting on the 462 MHz interstitial channels must not exceed 5 Watts.
( c ) *467 MHz interstitial channels.* The effective radiated power (ERP) of hand-held portable units transmitting on the 467 MHz interstitial channels must not exceed 0.5 Watt. Each GMRS transmitter type capable of transmitting on these channels must be designed such that the ERP does not exceed 0.5 Watt.
§ 218.238 Renewals and modifications of a Letter of Authorization. ( a ) An LOA issued under §§ 216.106 of this chapter and 218.237 for the activity identified in § 218.230 may be renewed or modified upon request by the applicant, provided that: ( 1 ) The planned specified activity and mitigation, monitoring, and reporting measures, as well as the anticipated impacts, are the same as those described and analyzed for the regulations in this subpart (excluding changes made pursuant to the adaptive management provision in paragraph (c)(1) of this section); and
( 2 ) NMFS determines that the mitigation, monitoring, and reporting measures required by the previous LOA(s) were implemented.
( b ) For LOA modification or renewal requests by the Navy that include changes to the activity or to the mitigation, monitoring, or reporting measures (excluding changes made pursuant to the adaptive management provision in paragraph (c)(1) of this section) that do not change the findings made for the regulations or that do not result in more than a minor change in the total estimated number of takes (or distribution by species or stock or years), NMFS may publish notification of a planned LOA in the Federal Register, including the associated analysis of the change, and solicit public comment before issuing the LOA.
( c ) An LOA issued under §§ 216.106 of this chapter and 218.237 may be modified by NMFS under the following circumstances: ( 1 ) *Adaptive management.* After consulting with the Navy regarding the practicability of the modifications, NMFS may modify (including adding or removing measures) the existing mitigation, monitoring, or reporting measures if doing so creates a reasonable likelihood of more effectively accomplishing the goals of the mitigation and monitoring. ( i ) Possible sources of data that could contribute to the decision to modify the mitigation, monitoring, or reporting measures in an LOA include: ( A ) Results from the Navy's monitoring from the previous year(s);
( B ) Results from other marine mammal and/or sound research or studies; or
( C ) Any information that reveals marine mammals may have been taken in a manner, extent, or number not authorized by the regulations in this subpart or subsequent LOAs.
( ii ) If, through adaptive management, the modifications to the mitigation, monitoring, or reporting measures are substantial, NMFS will publish a notice of planned LOA in the Federal Register and solicit public comment.
( 2 ) *Emergencies.* If NMFS determines that an emergency exists that poses a significant risk to the well-being of the species or stocks of marine mammals specified in LOAs issued pursuant to §§ 216.106 of this chapter and 218.237, an LOA may be modified without prior notice or opportunity for public comment. Notice would be published in the Federal Register within thirty days of the action.