alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 16-27442 Doc 1 Filed 08/26/16 Entered 08/26/16 12:33:43 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 10
Case 16-27442 Doc 1 Filed 08/26/16 Entered 08/26/16 12:33:43 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 10
Case 16-27442 Doc 1 Filed 08/26/16 Entered 08/26/16 12:33:43 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 10
Case 16-27442 Doc 1 Filed 08/26/16 Entered 08/26/16 12:33:43 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 10
Case 16-27442 Doc 1 Filed 08/26/16 Entered 08/26/16 12:33:43 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 10
Case 16-27442 Doc 1 Filed 08/26/16 Entered 08/26/16 12:33:43 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 10
Case 16-27442 Doc 1 Filed 08/26/16 Entered 08/26/16 12:33:43 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 10
Case 16-27442 Doc 1 Filed 08/26/16 Entered 08/26/16 12:33:43 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 10
Case 16-27442 Doc 1 Filed 08/26/16 Entered 08/26/16 12:33:43 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 10
Case 16-27442 Doc 1 Filed 08/26/16 Entered 08/26/16 12:33:43 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 10
# EUR-Lex - 12002E163 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E163

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Three: Community policies - Title XVIII: Research and technological development - Article 163 - Article 130f - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0105 - 0105 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0251 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0050 - Consolidated version *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Three: Community policies

Title XVIII: Research and technological development

Article 163

Article 130f - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 163

1. The Community shall have the objective of strengthening the scientific and technological bases of Community industry and encouraging it to become more competitive at international level, while promoting all the research activities deemed necessary by virtue of other chapters of this Treaty.

2. For this purpose the Community shall, throughout the Community, encourage undertakings, including small and medium-sized undertakings, research centres and universities in their research and technological development activities of high quality; it shall support their efforts to cooperate with one another, aiming, notably, at enabling undertakings to exploit the internal market potential to the full, in particular through the opening-up of national public contracts, the definition of common standards and the removal of legal and fiscal obstacles to that cooperation.

3. All Community activities under this Treaty in the area of research and technological development, including demonstration projects, shall be decided on and implemented in accordance with the provisions of this title.
FY 2024 CTAS Application Timeline(s) Template 

Tribe Name: 

Applicants are strongly encouraged to use this template to develop a detailed timeline for each purpose area under which they are requesting funding. Each purpose area timeline should 

encompass the entire period of performance for the proposed project and should outline goals, objectives, major activities/tasks, responsibility (person/position/team) for completion, and 

estimated start and completion for each entry. Estimated start and completion should be entered by month (not calendar dates). If awarded, it is expected that applicants will update the 

purpose area timeline(s) as appropriate when changes occur. *Note: There is no page limit restriction and applicants can take as much space as needed to create an effective timeline. Additional 

lines can be added to the timeline by using the “tab” keyboard function. 

Example Month Entry for Timeline 

Year 1: Months 1–12 | Year 2: Months 13–24 | Year 3: Months 25–36 | Year 4: Months 37–48 | Year 5: Months 49–60 

Purpose Area 1 

Estimated Task 

Start (Month)

Estimated Task 

Completion 

(Month)

Goal Related Objectives Activities Responsibility 

(person/position/team)
FY 2024 CTAS Application Timeline(s) Template 

Purpose Area 2 

Estimated Task 

Start (Month)

Estimated Task 

Completion 

(Month)

Goal Related Objectives Activities Responsibility 

(person/position/team)

Purpose Area 3 

Estimated Task 

Start (Month)

Estimated Task 

Completion 

(Month)

Goal Related Objectives Activities 

FY 2024 

page 2 

Responsibility 

(person/position/team)
FY 2024 CTAS Application Timeline(s) Template 

Purpose Area 4 

Estimated Task 

Start (Month)

Estimated Task 

Completion 

(Month)

Goal Related Objectives Activities Responsibility 

(person/position/team)

Purpose Area 6 

Estimated Task 

Start (Month)

Estimated Task 

Completion 

(Month)

Goal Related Objectives Activities 

FY 2024 

page 3 

Responsibility 

(person/position/team)
FY 2024 CTAS Application Timeline(s) Template 

Purpose Area 8 

Estimated Task 

Start (Month)

Estimated Task 

Completion 

(Month)

Goal Related Objectives Activities Responsibility 

(person/position/team)

Purpose Area 9 

Estimated Task 

Start (Month)

Estimated Task 

Completion 

(Month)

Goal Related Objectives Activities 

FY 2024 

page 4 

Responsibility 

(person/position/team)
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

September 9, 2013

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers (AAM) regarding Tier 3

FROM: Michael Olechiw

TO: EPA Docket # EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0135

This memo documents a meeting held on September 9, 2013 between representatives of AAM

and EPA to discuss Tier 3.

The agenda as well as the attendees are shown below. The purpose of the meeting was to clarify

points in the Tier 3 rule.
EPA – Alliance Tier 3 Meeting

Mon, 9-Sep, 11:00 a.m. (Eastern)

Call-In: (866) 401-3946

PIN: 317-117-0776#

Agenda:

1. Introductions

2. R Factor

3. US06 PM Standards 

4. Update/Status of Tier 3 Rulemaking

EPA Attendees:

Bill Charmley

Michael Olechiw

Industry Attendees:

Name Company

Julie Becker Alliance

Giedrius Ambrozaitis Alliance

Vaughn Burns Chrysler

Cynthia Williams Ford

Jeff Glodich Ford

Bob Babik GM

David Robertson Mazda

Matt Kevnick Toyota

Oliver Schmidt VW

Jenny Sigelko VW

Steve Douglas (*Phone) Alliance
#### § 270.12 Notice of Council meetings.

The Council will give NMFS the same notice of its meetings as it gives to its members. NMFS will have the right to participate in all Council meetings.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1285/2005

of 3 August 2005         

amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2368/2002 implementing the Kimberley Process certification scheme for the international trade in rough diamonds

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2368/2002 of 20 December 2002 implementing the Kimberley Process certification scheme for the international trade in rough diamonds (1), and in particular Article 20 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 2368/2002 is hereby replaced by the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall be applicable from 1 August 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 August 2005.

For the Commission

Benita FERRERO-WALDNER            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 358, 31.12.2002, p. 28. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 718/2005 (OJ L 126, 19.5.2005, p. 68).

----

ANNEX

                     ‘ANNEX II

List of participants in the Kimberley Process certification scheme and their duly appointed competent authorities as referred to in Articles 2, 3, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19 and 20.

ANGOLA

ARMENIA

Department of Gemstones and Jewellery

Ministry of Trade and Economic Development

Yerevan

Armenia

AUSTRALIA

BELARUS

BOTSWANA

BRAZIL

BULGARIA

CANADA

International:

For specimen of the Canadian KP Certificate:

General Enquiries:

CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC

CHINA, People’s Republic of

HONG KONG, Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China

CONGO, Democratic Republic of

COTE D’IVOIRE

CROATIA

Ministry of Economy

Zagreb

Republic of Croatia

EUROPEAN COMMUNITY

GHANA

GUINEA

GUYANA

INDIA

INDONESIA

ISRAEL

JAPAN

KOREA, Republic of

LAOS, People’s Democratic Republic

Department of Foreign Trade,

Ministry of Commerce

Vientiane

Laos

LESOTHO

MALAYSIA

MAURITIUS

NAMIBIA

NORWAY

ROMANIA

RUSSIAN FEDERATION

SIERRA LEONE

Ministry of Mineral Resources

Youyi Building

Brookfields

Freetown

Sierra Leone

SINGAPORE

SOUTH AFRICA

SRI LANKA

SWITZERLAND

TAIWAN, PENGHU, KINMEN AND MATSU, Separate Customs Territory

Export/Import Administration Division

Bureau of Foreign Trade

Ministry of Economic Affairs

Taiwan

TANZANIA

THAILAND

TOGO

UKRAINE

UNITED ARAB EMIRATES

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VENEZUELA

VIETNAM

ZIMBABWE

----
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

In re: 

CHARMAINE E PORTER NATHAN

Debtor(s)

Case No. 16-25581

CHAPTER 13 STANDING TRUSTEE’S FINAL REPORT AND ACCOUNT

Tom Vaughn, chapter 13 trustee, submits the following Final Report and Account of the 

administration of the estate pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1302(b)(1). The trustee declares as follows:

1) The case was filed on 08/09/2016.

2) The plan was confirmed on NA .

3) The plan was modified by order after confirmation pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1329 on

NA .

4) The trustee filed action to remedy default by the debtor in performance under the plan 

on NA .

5) The case was dismissed on 08/29/2016.

6) Number of months from filing to last payment: 0.

7) Number of months case was pending: 2.

8) Total value of assets abandoned by court order: NA .

9) Total value of assets exempted: NA .

10) Amount of unsecured claims discharged without payment: $0.00.

11) All checks distributed by the trustee relating to this case have cleared the bank.

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (09/01/2009)

Case 16-25581 Doc 15 Filed 10/04/16 Entered 10/04/16 11:16:59 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 3
Receipts:

Total paid by or on behalf of the debtor $0.00

Less amount refunded to debtor $0.00

NET RECEIPTS: $0.00

Expenses of Administration:

Attorney’s Fees Paid Through the Plan $0.00

Court Costs $0.00

Trustee Expenses & Compensation $0.00

Other $0.00

TOTAL EXPENSES OF ADMINISTRATION: $0.00

Attorney fees paid and disclosed by debtor: $0.00

Scheduled Creditors:

Creditor

Name Class

Claim

Scheduled

Claim

Asserted

Claim

Allowed

Int.

Paid

Principal

Paid

Summary of Disbursements to Creditors:

Secured Payments:

Mortgage Ongoing

Mortgage Arrearage

Debt Secured by Vehicle

All Other Secured

TOTAL SECURED:

Priority Unsecured Payments:

Domestic Support Arrearage

Domestic Support Ongoing

All Other Priority

TOTAL PRIORITY:

GENERAL UNSECURED PAYMENTS:

Claim

Allowed

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Principal

Paid

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Interest

Paid

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (09/01/2009)

Case 16-25581 Doc 15 Filed 10/04/16 Entered 10/04/16 11:16:59 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 3
Disbursements:

Expenses of Administration $0.00

Disbursements to Creditors $0.00

TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS : $0.00

12) The trustee certifies that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 5009, 

the estate has been fully administered, the foregoing summary is true and complete, and all 

administrative matters for which the trustee is responsible have been completed. The trustee 

requests a final decree be entered that discharges the trustee and grants such other relief as may 

be just and proper.

Dated: 10/04/2016

STATEMENT: This Unified Form is associated with an open bankruptcy case, therefore, Paperwork Reduction 

Act exemption 5 C.F.R. § 1320.4(a)(2) applies.

By:/s/ Tom Vaughn

Trustee

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (09/01/2009)

Case 16-25581 Doc 15 Filed 10/04/16 Entered 10/04/16 11:16:59 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 3
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5208

To establish limits on wage continuation and severance benefits for Amtrak

employees displaced by a discontinuance of service, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 6, 1994

Mr. BARTON of Texas (for himself, Mr. BREWSTER, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of

Texas, Mr. DELAY, Mr. HEFLEY, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr. MCCOLLUM,

and Mr. STENHOLM) introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To establish limits on wage continuation and severance benefits for Amtrak employees displaced by a discontinuance

of service, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SERVICE DISCONTINUANCE.

4 Section 24706(c) of title 49, United States Code, is

5 amended by adding at the end the following new para6 graphs:

7 ‘‘(7) Notwithstanding any arrangement in effect be8 fore the date of enactment of this paragraph, no employee

9 of Amtrak whose employment is terminated as a result
2

•HR 5208 IH

1 of a discontinuance of intercity rail passenger service shall

2 receive any wage continuation or severance benefit in ex3 cess of 6 months pay. This paragraph shall not affect the

4 obligations of rail carriers under section 11347 of this

5 title.

6 ‘‘(8) Notwithstanding any arrangement in effect be7 fore the date of enactment of this paragraph, Amtrak may

8 require an employee whose position is eliminated as a re9 sult of a discontinuance of intercity rail passenger service

10 to transfer to any vacant position for which the employee

11 can be made qualified on any part of Amtrak’s system.

12 If such transfer requires a change in residence or seniority

13 district, the employee shall choose—

14 ‘‘(A) to transfer to the position and be covered

15 by the collective bargaining agreement applicable to

16 the seniority district to which he is transferred; or

17 ‘‘(B) to voluntarily furlough himself at his

18 home location and receive protective benefits not in

19 excess of the amount authorized under paragraph

20 (7).

21 For purposes of this paragraph, a transfer shall be consid22 ered to require a change in residence if the new employ23 ment is more than 30 miles from the employee’s place of
3

•HR 5208 IH

1 residence and is farther from that residence than was the

2 former work location.’’.

Æ
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0827The Effects of COPS Office Funding on Sworn Force Levels, Crime, and Arrests: Evidence from a Regression Discontinuity DesignThis paper estimates the effects on crime from increased spending on police by studying the 2009 competition for officer hiring grants carried out by the U.S. Department of Justice's Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS Office). Because the competition was oversubscribed, the COPS Office ranked applicants in descending order using a score derived from their responses to application questions and distributed $1 billion in grants until the funding was exhausted. Using a regression discontinuity (RD) design, we show that receipt of COPS Office grant funding increased the size of police forces in 2009 by almost 2 percent relative to 2007-2008. In the following years, we find suggestive evidence that total crime rates declined from their baseline levels by almost 5 percent. Finally, we find some evidence that arrest rates decreased as well, suggesting that deterrence may be a key mechanism behind this effect.By Philip J. Cook, Max Kapustin, Jens Ludwig, Douglas L. MillerCategories: Data and AnalysisLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0827Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Jan 2017Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 05:32 (UTC-5) in 0.20 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Managed Pension Assets Partnership 1990-A, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of
operations  contained in its Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31, 1997 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         361,633
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  151,723
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               519,674
<PP&E>                                         4,760,509
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,810,403)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,469,780
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,571
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,463,209
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,469,780
<SALES>                                        564,518
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               577,136
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  202,251<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                293,473
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            293,473
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   293,473
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 09-2324

PAT GODIN,

Plaintiff, Appellee,

v.

PATTY SCHENCKS, JOLEEN NICELY, and DONNA METTA,

Defendants, Appellants,

SCHOOL UNION #134 and MACHIASPORT SCHOOL DEPARTMENT BOARD OF

DIRECTORS,

Defendants.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on December 22, 2010 is

amended as follows:

On page 11, line 1, "Corp." is changed to "Corporation"

On page 12, lines 11-12, "458 U.S. 263, 269 (1982) (internal

quotation marks omitted))" is changed to "458 U.S. 263, 269 (1982))

(internal quotation marks omitted)"

On page 12, line 16, "(quotation mark" is changed to

"(internal quotation mark"

At page 19, footnote 13, line 7, "See Walker, 446 U.S. at 751-

52." is changed to "See Walker v. Armco Steel Corp., 446 U.S. 740,

751-52 (1980)."

On page 23, line 18, the following footnote 18 is added at the

end of the sentence. The remaining footnotes should be renumbered

accordingly.

There may be a concern that Section 556, to the extent it
might be read to allow, contrary to Rule 56, a judge to

resolve a disputed material issue of fact, would then

preclude a party from exercising its Seventh Amendment

rights to trial by jury on disputed issues of material

fact. Cf. Pease v. Rathbun-Jones Eng'g Co., 243 U.S.

273, 278 (1917) (summary judgment does not violate

Seventh Amendment). But Section 556 is a relatively

young statute, not much construed by the state courts,

and there is no reason to think the state courts would

construe Section 556 so as to be incompatible with the

Seventh Amendment. Although the Seventh Amendment has

not been incorporated against the states, Curtis v.

Loether, 415 U.S. 189, 192 n.6 (1974), Maine's

constitution itself provides that "[i]n all civil suits,

and in all controversies concerning property, the parties

shall have a right to a trial by jury, except in cases

where it has heretofore been otherwise practiced." Me.

Const. art. I, § 20. This provision has "historically

been construed as guaranteeing the right to a trial by

jury in civil cases unless it is demonstrated that such

a right did not exist at the time of the adoption of

[Maine's] Constitution." Smith v. Hawthorne, 892 A.2d

433, 444 (Me. 2006). We do note that the heightened

pleading standard under the Private Securities Litigation

Reform Act (PSLRA) does not violate the Seventh

Amendment. See Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights,

Ltd., 551 U.S. 308, 327 & n.8 (2007).
§ 600.754 Decision to establish a fishery negotiation panel. ( a ) *Determination to establish an FNP.* If, after considering comments and applications submitted under § 600.753, the Council or NMFS determines that an FNP can adequately represent the interests that will be significantly affected and that it is feasible and appropriate in the particular case, the Council or NMFS may establish an FNP.
( b ) *Determination not to establish FNP.* If, after considering such comments and applications, the Council or NMFS decides not to establish an FNP, the Council or NMFS shall promptly publish notification of such decision and the reasons therefor in the Federal Register and, as appropriate, in trade or other specialized publications, a copy of which shall be sent to any person who applied for, or nominated another person for membership on the FNP to represent such interests with respect to the issues of concern.