alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ON ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR

WALK

- IN COOLERS AND WALK

- IN FREEZERS

U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW. Washington, DC 20585 Wednesday

, May 19, 2010

Room 8E-089

Purpose The Department of Energy (DOE) seeks comments, information, and data from interested parties

on the preliminary analyses addressing energy conservation standards for walk -in coolers and

walk

- in freezers (WICF or walk -ins).

Agenda

9:00 – 9:30 am Welcome , Introductions, Agenda Review , & Opening Statements Doug Brookman Interested parties make a brief summary of their comments.

9:30 – 9:45 am Rulemaking Overview
Charles Llenza Summary of the statutory background, rulemaking process, and the issues on which DOE seeks input during today's public meeting.

9:45 – 10:45 am Market and Technology Assessment, Screening Analysis, and Engineering Analysis

Eric Fitz , Claire Gagne, and Rebecca Legett Summary presentation and discussion regarding the approach used and factors considered for the market and technology assessment, screening analysis, and engineering analysis.

10:45 – 11:00 am Break

11:00 – 11:45 am Markups for Equipment Price Determination and Energy Use Analysis Gopal Bandyopadhyay Summary presentation and discussion regarding the approach used and factors considered for the markups to determine equipment price analysis

and energy use analysis

.11:45 – 12:45 pm Shipments Analysis, Life -Cycle Cost and Payback Period Analysis, and National Impact Analysis

Gavin McCormick Summary presentation and discussion regarding the approach used and factors considered for the shipments analysis, life -cycle cost and payback period analysis, and national energy savings and net present value analysis

.

12:45 – 1:45 pm Lunch

1:45 – 2:15 pm Manufacturer Impact Analysis Rebecca Legett Summary presentation and discussion regarding the approach to be used and

f actors to be considered for the manufacturer impact analysis.

2:15 – 2:45 pm NOPR Analyses: Utility Impact Analysis, Employment Impact Analysis, Environmental Assessment, and Regulatory Impact Analysis Rebecca Legett Description of analys e s DOE will conduct in the NOPR stage of the rulemaking.

2:45 – 3:00 pm Break

3:00 – 4:00 pm T est Procedures Rebecca Legett

A presentation summarizing the key test procedure issues will be provided which will then be open to participant’s discussion and feedback.

4:00 – 4:30 pm Next Steps and Closing Remarks
Charles Llenza Participant’s to finalize discussions on issues and concluding remarks.
#### § 402.31 Purpose.

The purpose of these counterpart regulations is to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of the consultation process under section 7 of the ESA for Fire Plan Projects by providing an optional alternative to the procedures found in §§ 402.13 and 402.14(b) of this part. These regulations permit an Action Agency to enter into an Alternative Consultation Agreement (ACA) with the Service, as described in § 402.33, which will allow the Action Agency to determine that a Fire Plan Project is “not likely to adversely affect” (NLAA) a listed species or designated critical habitat without formal or informal consultation with the Service or written concurrence from the Service. An NLAA determination for a Fire Plan Project made under an ACA, as described in § 402.33, completes the Action Agency's statutory obligation to consult with the Service for that Project. In situations where the Action Agency does not make an NLAA determination under the ACA, the Action Agency would still be required to conduct formal consultation with the Service when required by § 402.14. This process will be as protective to listed species and designated critical habitat as the process established in subpart B of this part. The standards and requirements for formal consultation under subpart B for Fire Plan Projects that do not receive an NLAA determination are unchanged.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                  EXHIBIT 11

                NATIONAL VISION ASSOCIATES, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


                                                              Year Ended              Year Ended             Year Ended  
                                                              December 30,            December 28,            January 3,
                                                                  1995                    1996                   1998
                                                              ------------            ------------           ------------

<S>                                                           <C>                     <C>                     <C>
NET INCOME (LOSS)                                             $(1,520,000)            $ 3,480,000             $ 5,573,000
                                                              ===========             ===========             ===========
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON 
 SHARES OUTSTANDING                                            20,537,799              20,618,349              20,676,359

BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE                        $     (0.07)            $      0.17             $      0.27
                                                              ===========             ===========             ===========


WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON 
 SHARES OUTSTANDING                                            20,537,799              20,618,349              20,676,359

 Options for common stock assumed
  to be converted using the 
  treasury stock method                                            -0-   (a)               88,280                 162,806
                                                              -----------             -----------             -----------  
AVERAGE COMMON SHARES 
 OUTSTANDING, as adjusted                                      20,537,799              20,706,629              20,839,165
                                                              ===========              ==========             ===========

DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE                      $     (0.07)             $     0.17             $      0.27
                                                              ===========              ==========             ===========

</TABLE>

(a)    Options for common stock and other dilutive securities are excluded 
       from the calculation of weighted average shares outstanding for
       diluted earnings per common share during 1995 as the effect would 
       be anti-dilutive.
# Map            Rwanda and Burundi.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

LORENZO VALDEZ-GARATE, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-50252 

D.C. No. 3:15-cr-00737-LAB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 13, 2018**

Before: LEAVY, M. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Lorenzo Valdez-Garate appeals from the district court’s judgment and 

challenges the 65-month sentence imposed upon remand following his guilty-plea 

conviction for importation of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 

and 960. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 20 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-50252 

Valdez-Garate contends that the district court misapplied the minor role 

Guideline, U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2, by failing to compare him to his co-participants in 

the offense and instead comparing him to hypothetical average drug couriers. We 

review the district court’s interpretation of the Guidelines de novo, and its 

application of the Guidelines to the facts for abuse of discretion. See United States 

v. Gasca-Ruiz, 852 F.3d 1167, 1170 (9th Cir. 2017) (en banc). 

Contrary to Valdez-Garate’s contention, when analyzing the five factors 

under the Guideline, the district court considered the two recruiters he identified as 

well as other likely participants in the offense. See United States v. QuinteroLeyva, 823 F.3d 519, 523 (9th Cir. 2016). Keeping those co-participants “in 

mind,” the court concluded that Valdez-Garate had failed to show that he was 

“substantially less culpable than the average participant in the criminal activity.” 

See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 cmt. n.3(A). The court correctly identified and applied the 

correct legal standard and, in light of the totality of the circumstances, did not 

abuse its discretion by denying the adjustment. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 cmt. n.3(C). 

AFFIRMED.
#### § 403.08 List of States to which management has been transferred.

The following states have received management authority pursuant to this part for the species listed and, where appropriate, cooperative allocation agreements pursuant to § 403.05(c) are in force: [Reserved]
# EUR-Lex - 11957E024 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957E024

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY, PART TWO - FOUNDATIONS OF THE COMMUNITY, TITLE I - FREE MOVEMENT OF GOODS, CHAPTER 1: THE CUSTOMS UNION, SECTION 2: SETTING UP OF THE COMMON CUSTOMS TARIFF, ARTICLE 24 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 24

MEMBER STATES SHALL REMAIN FREE TO CHANGE THEIR DUTIES MORE RAPIDLY THAN IS PROVIDED FOR IN ARTICLE 23 IN ORDER TO BRING THEM INTO LINE WITH THE COMMON CUSTOMS TARIFF .
§ 22.70 Eagle falconry permits. ( a ) *Use of golden eagles in falconry.* If you meet the conditions outlined in § 21.82(c)(3)(iv) of this part, and you have a permit to possess a golden eagle (*Aquila chrysaetos*) from your State, tribe, or territory, we consider your permit sufficient for the purposes of the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668-668d), subject to the requirement that take of golden eagles for falconry is compatible with the preservation of the golden eagle.
( b ) *Transfer of golden eagles trapped by government employees to other permittees.* If you have the necessary permit(s) from your State, tribe, or territory, a government employee who has trapped a golden eagle under a Federal depredation permit or under a depredation control order may transfer the bird to you if he or she cannot release the eagle in an appropriate location. A golden eagle may only be taken from a livestock or wildlife depredation area declared by USDA Wildlife Services and permitted under § 22.100, or from a livestock depredation area authorized in accordance with Subpart D—Provisions for Depredating Eagles.
[73 FR 59477, Oct. 8, 2008, as amended at 75 FR 932, Jan. 7, 2010. Redesignated and amended at 87 FR 884, Jan. 7, 2022]
Redesignated and amended at 87 FR 884, Jan. 7, 2022]
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of United American Healthcare Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, William C. Brooks, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
            of the Company.

Dated August 26, 2004

                                    By: /s/ William C. Brooks
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                    President & Chief Executive Officer
                                    (principal executive officer)
# Map            [Afghanistan].
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
     audited balance sheets for the year ended December 31, 1998 and is
     qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000867889
<NAME>                        INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION DATA SYSTEMS
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CURRENCY>                                         USD
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          40,735
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,713
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,362
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                78,131
<PP&E>                                          13,187
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,450
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 155,156
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,306
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           173
<OTHER-SE>                                     133,652
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   155,156
<SALES>                                        115,460
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               115,460
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   44,334
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                74,131
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,740
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,195)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,095)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,100)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (826)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,926)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.25)
        


</TABLE>
Filed 4/10/16

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

CHRISTOPHER JAMES SLOAT,

Defendant and Appellant. B270080

( Los Angeles County

Super. Ct. No. KA057527)

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los

Angeles County, Salvatore T. Sirna, Judge. Reversed and

remanded.

Tyrone A. Sandoval, under appointment by the Court of

Appeal, for Defendant and Appel lant.

Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Gerald A. Engler,

Chief Assistant Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Senior

Assistant Attorney General, Mary Sanchez and Analee J. Brodie,

Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

### 2 Defendant, Chri stopher James Sloat, filed a Penal Code 1

section 1170.18 , subdivision (f ) petition. Defendant sought to

have his 2002 felony petty theft with a prior conviction (former §

666 , Stats. 2000, ch. 135, § 134, p. 1991) ) designated a

misdemeanor. At a hearing defendant did not attend and where

he was not represented by counsel, the trial court denied the

petition . The trial court impliedly agreed with the prosecutor

that defendant was ineligible because the theft was not from an

“open commercial business.” Th is was an apparent reference to

section 459.5, subdivision (a)

, which governs the crime of

shoplifting. Defendant argues, and t he Attorney General

concedes

, defendant is eligible to have his conviction under

former section 666 reduced to a misdemeanor

. T he Attorney

General states : “[D]efendant was not seeking to have his . . .

conviction reduced to misdemeanor shoplifting. Rather, he

sought reduction of his felony petty theft with priors convict ion to

misdemeanor petty theft.

. . . Unlike shoplifting ( § 459.5 [, subd.

(a)] ), petty theft (§ 490.2 [, subd. (a)] ) does not require that a

defendant enter a commercial establishment during regular

business hours.” We agree with the Attorney General’s analysis.

1 Further statutory references are to the Penal Code.

### 3 The order denying defendant’s petition to designate as a

misdemeanor his conviction for petty theft with a prior is

reversed. Upon remit titur issuance, the trial co urt is to

reconsider the petition in light of our analysis.

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

TURNER, P.J.

We concur:

KRIEGLER , J.

BAKER, J.
Order filed January 3, 2019 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-17-00315-CR

____________

JOHN ANTHONY VELA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 209th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1444432

ORDER

This court has determined, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 

34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of State's Exhibit 2, a map 

and State's Exhibit 65, a chart.
The clerk of the 209th District Court is directed to deliver to the Clerk of this 

court the original of State's Exhibit 2, a map and State's Exhibit 65, a chart, on or 

before January 10, 2019. The Clerk of this court is directed to receive, maintain, 

and keep safe this original exhibit; to deliver it to the justices of this court for their 

inspection; and, upon completion of inspection, to return the original of State's 

Exhibit 2, a map and State's Exhibit 65, a chart, to the clerk of the 209th District 

Court.

PER CURIAM
# EUR-Lex - 11997E014 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11997E014

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Amsterdam consolidated version) - Part One: Principles - Article 14 - Article 7a - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) **

*
Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0185 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0010 - Consolidated version *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Amsterdam consolidated version)

Article 14

1. The Community shall adopt measures with the aim of progressively establishing the internal market over a period expiring on 31 December 1992, in accordance with the provisions of this Article and of Articles 15, 26, 47(2), 49, 80, 93 and 95 and without prejudice to the other provisions of this Treaty.

2. The internal market shall comprise an area without internal frontiers in which the free movement of goods, persons, services and capital is ensured in accordance with the provisions of this Treaty.

3. The Council, acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission, shall determine the guidelines and conditions necessary to ensure balanced progress in all the sectors concerned.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of
title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Precision Optics Corporation, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's
knowledge, that:

The
annual report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended June 30, 2009 (the "Form 10-K/A") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

DATE: May 14, 2010/s/ Richard E. Forkey Richard E. Forkey, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer, President and Treasurer/s/ Jack P. Dreimiller Jack P. Dreimiller, Chief Financial Officer Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer


---



QuickLinks
# EUR-Lex - 12004V/AFI/DCL/29 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V/AFI/DCL/29

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - FINAL ACT - A.Declarations concerning provisions of the Constitution - 29.Declaration on Article IV-448(2) **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0463 - 0463 *

29. Declaration on Article IV-448(2)

The Conference considers that the possibility of producing translations of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe in the languages mentioned in Article IV-448(2) contributes to fulfilling the objective of respecting the Union's rich cultural and linguistic diversity as set forth in the fourth subparagraph of Article I-3(3) of that Treaty. In this context, the Conference confirms the attachment of the Union to the cultural diversity of Europe and the special attention it will continue to pay to these and other languages.

The Conference recommends that those Member States wishing to avail themselves of the possibility recognised in Article IV-448(2) communicate to the Council, within six months from the date of the signature of that Treaty, the language or languages into which translations of that Treaty will be made.

--------------------------------------------------