alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, Donald Sharpe, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Eden Energy Corp.
      for the period ended March 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Eden Energy Corp.                                                                 

Dated: May 13, 2008

| | /s/ Drew Bonnell                                              
| | --------------------------------------------------------------
| | Drew Bonnell                                                  
| | Secretary, Treasurer and CFO                                  
| | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Eden Energy
Corp. and will be retained by Eden Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
INSIDE THE "USDA NEWS"

----
# EUR-Lex - 11957A190 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957A190

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY ( E.A.E.C. - EURATOM ), TITLE FIVE - GENERAL PROVISIONS, ARTICLE 190 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 190

THE RULES GOVERNING THE LANGUAGES OF THE INSTITUTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY SHALL , WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO THE PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN THE RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE , BE DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL , ACTING UNANIMOUSLY .
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED SEPTEMBER 30 , 2020

NO. 03

- 19

- 00259

- CV

Appellant, Rodolfo Canales, Jr.// Cross

- Appellants, Ken Paxton, in his Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Texas; and the Off ice of The Attorney General, in its Capacity as the Title IV

- D Agency under Part D of the Social Security Act

v.

Appellees, Ken Paxton, in his Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Texas; and the Office of The Attorney General, in its Cap acity as the Title IV

- D Agency under Part D of the Social Security Act// Cross

- Appellee, Rodolfo Canales, Jr.

APPEAL FROM THE 345TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND KELLY AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on April 19, 2019

. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ argu ments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error

in the judgment

. Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s judgment

. A ppellant shall pay all

costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the co urt below.
2022 COPS Office Tribal Resources Grant Program – Technical Assistance Award

State and Recipient Award Amount

Wisconsin

Fox Valley Technical College

Public Law 280 Training Program for Enhanced 

Collaborative Law Enforcement Update

$200,000
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 19

- 00392

- CV

I N THE I NTEREST OF J.V., A C HILD §

§

§

§ O n Appeal from the 89th District Court

of Wichita County (13158

- JR

- C)

April 1 , 2020

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

JUDGMENT

This court ha s considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no reversible error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment

of the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

Ju stice Lee Gabriel
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1771/2005

of 27 October 2005         

fixing the export refunds on cereals and on wheat or rye flour, groats and meal

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The export refunds on the products listed in Article 1(a), (b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003, excluding malt, exported in the natural state, shall be as set out in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 28 October 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 October 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

(2)OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

----

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 27 October 2005 fixing the export refunds on cereals and on wheat or rye flour, groats and meal

----
Case 16-25698 Doc 9 Filed 08/12/16 Entered 08/15/16 17:03:20 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Richard Barroso v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 21

- 00304

- CV

Trial court case number: 110208

- I

Trial court: 412th District Court of Brazoria County

Appellant, Richard Barroso, filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s May 18, 2021
“Order of Dismissal.” Appellant also filed a “Motion to be Granted to Proceed in Forma Pauperis as Status in Trial Court,” requesting to be permitted to proceed on appeal without payment of costs. Accordingly, on June 29, 2021, we directed the trial court clerk to prepare, certify, and file, with out advance payment of costs, a clerk’s record on indigence with all trial court filings regarding or related to appellant’s request to proceed without payment of costs on appeal, and any contest by any party to that request.

On July 13, 2021, the trial co urt clerk filed a clerk’s record on indigence including an affidavit of inability to pay costs filed by appellant in the trial court. See T EX

. R. C IV

. P. 145(a), (b), (d). The clerk’s record does not reflect that a contest to the affidavit was

filed , nor that the trial court overruled appellant’s claim of indigence

. See T EX

. R. C IV

. P. 145(f). Accordingly, appellant cannot be required to pay costs, including filing fees charged by this Court, nor fees charged for the preparation of the appellate record. See

T EX

. R. C IV

. P. 145(a), (c); T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to make an entry in this Court’s records that appellant is allowed to proceed on appeal without payment of costs. See T EX

. R.

C IV

. P. 145(a); T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1.

T he appellate record is due to be filed with this Court, at no cost to appellant, within thirty days of the date of this order. See T EX

. R. C IV

. P. 145(a), (c); T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.1.It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____

/s/ Am paro Guerra

________  Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: ___ July 20, 2021

____
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-30914

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

PEDRO WARDELL BROWN,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:96-CR-100-1

Before SMITH, PRADO, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Pedro Wardell Brown, federal prisoner # 25032-034, appeals the denial of

a motion to reconsider the denial of motion for a sentence reduction under 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Government has filed a brief on the merits and does not

suggest that the denial of § 3582(c)(2) relief is not properly before us; thus, we

address the merits of Brown’s arguments. See United States v. Martinez, 496

F.3d 387, 388-89 (5th Cir. 2007). 

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 5, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-30914 Document: 00512199243 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/05/2013
No. 12-30914

Brown argues that the denial of the motion has resulted in an aboveguidelines sentence, because he was initially sentenced within the Sentencing

Guidelines, but his sentence is now above the revised Guidelines. He contends

that the district court clearly erred by ignoring his lack of violent infractions in

prison, his educational accomplishments, his close family ties, and the fact that

his criminal history category over-represents the seriousness of his prior

offenses. We review the district court’s decision for abuse of discretion. See

United States v. Evans, 587 F.3d 667, 672 (5th Cir. 2009). 

The district court determined that Brown was eligible for a reduction in

sentence based on Amendment 750 of the Sentencing Guidelines; however, the

court concluded that a reduction was not appropriate in light of the 18 U.S.C.

§ 3553(a) factors, Brown’s prior criminal history, his violent conduct during his

arrest, the facts surrounding his conviction, and the fact that his sentence has

already been reduced pursuant to a prior § 3582(c)(2) motion. See Dillon v.

United States, 130 S. Ct. 2683, 2691 (2010). Brown has failed to show that the

district court abused its discretion in denying his § 3582(c)(2) motion. See

Evans, 587 F.3d at 672.

AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 12-30914 Document: 00512199243 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/05/2013
[Civ. No. 1359.

First Appellate District.

July 21, 1914.]

#### ALDEN ANDERSON, Superintendent of Banks of the State of California, Appellant, v. Y. NAWA et al., Respondents.

Banks—Enforcement of Liability of Stockholders—Action by Bank Commissioner—Dismissal for Delay in Service of Summons.—The judgment entered in favor of the respondent C. L. Tilden, on January 14, 1913, is affirmed, and the appeal from the judgment entered on February 14, 1913, is dismissed on the authority of *Anderson*v. *Nawa, ante,*p. 151.

APPEALS from judgments of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. George A. Sturtevant, Judge.

The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in *Anderson*v. *Nawa, ante,*p. 151.

F. A. Cutler, A. A. De Ligne, and H. W. Johnson, Jr., for Appellant.

J. J. Lerman, C. L. Tilden, and W. F. Postel, for Respondents.

THE COURT.

The parties to the above entitled cause having stipulated that the appeals from the two judgments rendered in the said action in favor of the respondent C. L. Tilden present questions identical to those presented in the appeals in the case, No. 1359, *Anderson*v. *Nawa et al.,*(opinion filed July 17, 1914), *ante,*p. 151, [143 Pac. 555], and the said parties having further stipulated that the facts in both eases upon which the judgments of dismissal are respectively based are in all respects substantially the same, and having *803further stipulated that the transcript and briefs and arguments filed or made on the appeal from the judgment in favor of respondent Swayne & Hoyt, a corporation (being case No. 1359, supra), may be considered as made and filed in the appeals from the judgments in favor of said respondent C. L. Tilden,

Now, therefore, it is hereby ordered upon the authority of the said case (No. 1359), and for the same reasons stated in the opinion filed therein, the first judgment, to wit, the judgment entered and recorded January 14, 1913, in favor of said respondent C. L. Tilden, is affirmed, and the appeal from the second judgment, to wit, the judgment entered and recorded February 14, 1913, is dismissed.
- 
      - ** Home
      - ** About Us
      - ** Archives
      - ** Events
      - ** Publications

### Contact Us

To provide feedback on the Community Policing Dispatch, e-mail the editorial board at CPDispatch@usdoj.gov.

To obtain details on COPS Office programs, publications, and resources, contact the COPS Office Response Center at 800-421-6770 or AskCopsRC@usdoj.gov

**U.S. Department of Justice**        Office of Community Oriented Policing Services 
www.cops.usdoj.gov

            - Home
            - About Us
            - Archives
            - News
            - Publications
            - Contact Us

### **The 2024 Community Policing in Action Photo Contest Winners!**

February 2024 | Volume 17 | Issue 2

The COPS Office is excited to announce the winners of the 2024 Community Policing in Action Photo Contest!

For the past decade, the COPS Office has invited state, local, territorial, and tribal law enforcement agencies to submit an image that reflects positive community policing to our photo contest.

This year, more than 170 agencies submitted photos that captured spirited moments of community engagement from across the nation. We want to thank all the law enforcement organizations that participated and encourage all organizations to continue to create more of these positive moments in the new year.

The winners of the 2024 Community Policing in Action Photo Contest, in alphabetical order, are as follows:

Broward County (Florida) Sheriff’s Office 

Clarksville (Tennessee) Police Department

Grand Junction (Colorado) Police Department 

Howard County (Maryland) Police Department 

Illinois State University Police Department 

Jacksonville (North Carolina) Police Department 

North Myrtle Beach (South Carolina) Police Department 

Palm Bay (Florida) Police Department 

Paris (Texas) Police Department

Romeoville (Illinois) Police Department 

Springfield (Illinois) Police Department

The winning photos from this year and prior years can also be viewed on the COPS Office’s Photo Contest page and in its Photo Galleries.

Tweet

**Subscribe to Email Updates**
To sign up for monthly updates or to access your subscriber preferences, please enter your email address in the Subscribe box.

The Community Policing Dispatch is the e-newsletter of the COPS Office. 

The Community Policing Dispatch is the e-newsletter of the COPS Office. 

**Explore**
            - Home
            - About Us
            - Archives
            - Events
            - Publications
            - Contact Us

**
Connect With Us 
**
Want to stay connected with the COPS office?             Follow us on social media!
            - 
            - 
            - 
- 
- 
- 

             FOIA 

             No FEAR Act 

             Open Government 

             Plain Writing 

             USA.gov 

             Legal Policies and Disclaimers 

             Language Access Plan 

             DOJ Privacy Policy
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Hollinger International Inc.
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the annual report of Hollinger International Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Peter K. Lane, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Act of 1934; and  2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: January 18, 2005 /s/ Peter K. LaneName:
    Peter K. LaneTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hollinger
International Inc. and will be retained by Hollinger International Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 16-27764 Doc 1 Filed 08/30/16 Entered 08/30/16 12:27:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 9
Case 16-27764 Doc 1 Filed 08/30/16 Entered 08/30/16 12:27:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 9
Case 16-27764 Doc 1 Filed 08/30/16 Entered 08/30/16 12:27:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 9
Case 16-27764 Doc 1 Filed 08/30/16 Entered 08/30/16 12:27:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 9
Case 16-27764 Doc 1 Filed 08/30/16 Entered 08/30/16 12:27:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 9
Case 16-27764 Doc 1 Filed 08/30/16 Entered 08/30/16 12:27:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 9
Case 16-27764 Doc 1 Filed 08/30/16 Entered 08/30/16 12:27:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 9
Case 16-27764 Doc 1 Filed 08/30/16 Entered 08/30/16 12:27:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 9
Case 16-27764 Doc 1 Filed 08/30/16 Entered 08/30/16 12:27:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 9
#### § 32.21 Alaska.

Alaska refuges are opened to hunting, fishing, and trapping pursuant to the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (Pub. L. 96-487, 16 U.S.C. 3101 *et seq.*). The regulations set forth at 50 CFR part 36 concern National Wildlife Refuges in Alaska. Information regarding specific refuge rules can be obtained from the Regional Office of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, AK (see 50 CFR 2.2), or by contacting the manager of the respective individual refuge.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 10783 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. GODOFREDO MARTINEZ

- LUVIANOS , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:14

- CR

- 16

- 1

Before JOLLY , GRAVES, and COSTA , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Godofredo Martinez

- Luvianos has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. Califo rnia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Martinez

- Luvianos h a s not filed a
response , has completed the confinement portion of his sentence, and has been removed from the United States

. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 1 8 , 2015

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-10783 Document: 00513158328 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2015No. 14

- 10783

2 relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, s ee 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2, and in part as moot, s ee United States v. Rosenbaum

- Alanis , 483 F .3d 381, 382

- 83 (5th Cir. 2007). Case: 14-10783 Document: 00513158328 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2015
# EUR-Lex - 12002E181A - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E181A

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Three: Community policies - Title XXI: Economic, Financial and Technical Cooperation with Third Countries - Article 181a - **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0111 - 0111 *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Three: Community policies

Title XXI: Economic, Financial and Technical Cooperation with Third Countries

Article 181a

Article 181a

1. Without prejudice to the other provisions of this Treaty, and in particular those of Title XX, the Community shall carry out, within its spheres of competence, economic, financial and technical cooperation measures with third countries. Such measures shall be complementary to those carried out by the Member States and consistent with the development policy of the Community.

Community policy in this area shall contribute to the general objective of developing and consolidating democracy and the rule of law, and to the objective of respecting human rights and fundamental freedoms.

2. The Council, acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament, shall adopt the measures necessary for the implementation of paragraph 1. The Council shall act unanimously for the association agreements referred to in Article 310 and for the agreements to be concluded with the States which are candidates for accession to the Union.

3. Within their respective spheres of competence, the Community and the Member States shall cooperate with third countries and the competent international organisations. The arrangements for Community cooperation may be the subject of agreements between the Community and the third parties concerned, which shall be negotiated and concluded in accordance with Article 300.

The first subparagraph shall be without prejudice to the Member States' competence to negotiate in international bodies and to conclude international agreements.
THOMAS ALLEN FULLER

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 4736

Opinion filed January 6, 2015.

Petition Se eking B elated A ppeal

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

Thomas Allen Fuller, pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED.

ROBERTS, RAY, and MAKAR, JJ.

, CONCUR.