alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   
 
                                                                           
                                                              Exhibit 13


     INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT ON APPLYING AGREED-UPON PROCEDURES



To the Board of Directors
Navistar Financial Corporation


   We have performed the procedures enumerated below, which were agreed to by
the management of Navistar Financial Corporation ("NFC"), solely to assist you
in evaluating whether the monthly trust statements were prepared by NFC in
accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreements dated December 1, 1990,
and June 8, 1995 (collectively known as the "Agreements") for the Dealer Note
Trust 1990 and the Dealer Note Master Trust Series 1995-1 (collectively known
as the "Trusts"), respectively.  This agreed-upon procedures engagement was
performed in accordance with standards established by the American Institute
of Certified Public Accountants.  The sufficiency of these procedures is
solely the responsibility of the specified users of the report.  Consequently,
we make no representation regarding the sufficiency of the procedures
described below either for the purpose for which this report has been
requested or for any other purpose.  The procedures we performed are as
follows:

   1.  We read the requirements of section 3.04(b) of the Agreements of the
       Trusts relating to monthly certificates.

   2.  In accordance with section 3.06(b) of the Agreements of the Trusts, we
       have proved the mathematical accuracy of the monthly certificates  
       issued during the fiscal year ended October 31, 1995.

   3.  In accordance with section 3.06(b) of the Agreements of the Trusts, we
       compared the amounts contained in the monthly certificates to the  
       computer reports of NFC and found them to be in agreement.

   We were not engaged to, and did not, perform an examination, the objective
of which would be the expression of an opinion on the accompanying Annual
Summary of Certificateholders' Statements Distribution and Performance Annual
Aggregate Report for the Navistar Financial Dealer Note Trust 1990 and Annual
Summary of Servicer and Settlement Certificates Distribution and Performance
Annual Aggregate Report for the Navistar Financial Dealer Note Master Trust
Series 1995-1.  Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.  Had we
performed additional procedures, other matters might have come to our
attention that would have been reported to you.

   This report is intended solely for the use of the Board of Directors and
management of NFC, and should not be used by those who have not agreed to the
procedures and taken responsibility for the sufficiency of the procedures for
their purposes.



/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
   DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
   Chicago, Illinois
   December 18, 1995
# EUR-Lex - 11957A047 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957A047

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY ( E.A.E.C. - EURATOM ), TITLE TWO - PROVISIONS FOR THE ENCOURAGEMENT OF PROGRESS IN THE FIELD OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, CHAPTER V: JOINT UNDERTAKINGS, ARTICLE 47 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 47

THE COUNCIL MAY , WHEN THE MATTER HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO IT BY THE COMMISSION , REQUEST THE LATTER TO SUPPLY SUCH FURTHER INFORMATION OR TO UNDERTAKE SUCH FURTHER INQUIRIES AS THE COUNCIL MAY CONSIDER NECESSARY .

IF THE COUNCIL , ACTING BY A QUALIFIED MAJORITY , CONSIDERS THAT A PROJECT FORWARDED BY THE COMMISSION WITH AN UNFAVOURABLE OPINION SHOULD NEVERTHELESS BE CARRIED OUT , THE COMMISSION SHALL SUBMIT TO THE COUNCIL THE PROPOSALS AND THE DETAILED REPORT REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 46 .

WHERE THE OPINION OF THE COMMISSION IS FAVOURABLE OR IN THE CASE REFERRED TO IN THE PRECEDING PARAGRAPH , THE COUNCIL SHALL ACT BY A QUALIFIED MAJORITY ON EACH OF THE PROPOSALS FROM THE COMMISSION .

THE COUNCIL SHALL , HOWEVER , ACT UNANIMOUSLY IN RESPECT OF :

( A ) PARTICIPATION BY THE COMMUNITY IN THE FINANCING OF THE JOINT UNDERTAKING ;

( B ) PARTICIPATION BY A THIRD STATE , AN INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATION OR A NATIONAL OF A THIRD STATE IN THE FINANCING OR MANAGEMENT OF THE JOINT UNDERTAKING .
# EUR-Lex - 11957A118 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957A118

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY ( E.A.E.C. - EURATOM ), TITLE THREE - PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INSTITUTIONS, CHAPTER I: THE INSTITUTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY, SECTION II: THE COUNCIL, ARTICLE 118 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 118

1 . SAVE AS OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN THIS TREATY , THE COUNCIL SHALL ACT BY A MAJORITY OF ITS MEMBERS .

2 . WHERE THE COUNCIL IS REQUIRED TO ACT BY A QUALIFIED MAJORITY , THE VOTES OF ITS MEMBERS SHALL BE WEIGHTED AS FOLLOWS :

BELGIUM : 2

GERMANY : 4

FRANCE : 4

ITALY : 4

LUXEMBOURG : 1

NETHERLANDS : 2

FOR THEIR ADOPTION , ACTS OF THE COUNCIL SHALL REQUIRE AT LEAST :

- TWELVE VOTES IN FAVOUR WHERE THIS TREATY REQUIRES THEM TO BE ADOPTED ON A PROPOSAL FROM THE COMMISSION ,

- TWELVE VOTES IN FAVOUR , CAST BY AT LEAST FOUR MEMBERS , IN OTHER CASES .

3 . ABSTENTIONS BY MEMBERS PRESENT IN PERSON OR REPRESENTED SHALL NOT PREVENT THE ADOPTION BY THE COUNCIL OF ACTS WHICH REQUIRE UNANIMITY .
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Celadon Group, Inc.
Registration Statement 333-14641 on Form S-8 pertaining to the Employee Stock
Purchase Plan dated October 23, 1996, Registration Statement 333-42209 on Form
S-8 pertaining to Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan dated December 12,
1997, and Registration Statements 333-42207 and 333-31164 on Form S-8 pertaining
to the 1994 stock Option Plan dated December 12, 1997 and February 25, 2000,
respectively, of our report dated August 24, 2001, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Celadon Group, Inc. included
in the annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2001.

                                                           /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana
September 28, 2001
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

          - 26 CFR Part 1 
          - [TD 9280] 
          - RIN 1545-BE10 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Correction to final regulations. 

      ( print page 55109)    

# SUMMARY:

                        This document contains a correction to final regulations that were published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on August 9, 2006 (71 FR 45379) that provide guidance on certain issues under section 411(d)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code), including the interaction between the anti-cutback rules of section 411(d)(6) and the nonforfeitability requirements of section 411(a).                     

# EFFECTIVE DATES:

This correction is effective August 9, 2006. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Pamela R. Kinard, at (202) 622-6060 (not a toll-free number). 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Background 

The final regulations that are the subject of this correction are under section 411(d)(6) of the Code. 

## Need for Correction 

As published, the final regulations (TD 9280), contain an error that may prove to be misleading and are in need of clarification. 

## Correction of Publication 

Accordingly, the publication of the final regulations (TD 9280), which were the subject of FR Doc. E6-12885, is corrected as follows: 

On page 45381, column 1, in the preamble, the last paragraph, line 8, the language “retained, subject to a certain” is corrected to read “retained, subject to certain”. 

Cynthia Grigsby, 

Senior Federal Liaison Officer, Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration). 

[FR Doc. 06-7864 Filed 9-20-06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 300

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 300 appear at 64 FR 44431, Aug. 16, 1999, and at 76 FR 59305, Sept. 26, 2011.

#### § 300.37 Radio monitoring.

The international distress frequency, 2.182 mHz, and 156.8 mHz (Channel 16, VHF) shall be monitored continuously from the vessel for the purpose of facilitating communication with the fisheries management, surveillance and enforcement authorities of the Parties.
[Crim. No. 536.

First Appellate District.

November 12, 1914.]

#### THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. ROBERT WEST, Appellant.

Criminal Law—Rape—Sufficiency of Evidence.—In this prosecution for rape it is held that upon the whole case the evidence does not appear to be inherently incredible and improbable and that it is sufficient to support the verdict.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County and from an order refusing a new trial. F. B. Ogden, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

A. L. Frick, and B. J. Wyman, for Appellant.

U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, John H. Riordan, Deputy. Attorney-General, for Respondent.

THE COURT.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment and order denying a new trial, the conviction being for the crime of rape. In support of the appeal it is-urged that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict, this contention being based upon the alleged inherent improbability of the evidence.

We have read the record and considered it carefully, and are satisfied that while an argument might be made against the truthfulness of the testimony, it fails when made against its inherent probability. The mere fact that it is.unusual and out of the ordinary to encounter the situation described in the record does not make it absolutely and inherently improbable. We do not see upon the whole case that the evidence is inherently incredible and improbable; on the contrary, the story in its entirety may well be true. In parts perhaps it is doubtful, and might be made the foundation of a strong argument to the jury that the complaining witness was not to be believed. That argument doubtless was made to the jury and considered by it, but such an argument cannot be considered by this court.

The judgment and order are affirmed.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4975

To amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985

to exclude changes in tariffs from the paygo scorecard and to amend

the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 to

exempt changes in tariffs from certain points of order.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 17, 1994

Mr. DREIER (for himself and Mr. KOLBE) introduced the following bill; which

was referred jointly to the Committees on Government Operations and Rules

A BILL

To amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 to exclude changes in tariffs from

the paygo scorecard and to amend the Congressional

Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 to exempt

changes in tariffs from certain points of order.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF TARIFF CHANGES ON THE

4 PAYGO SCORECARD.

5 Section 252 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency

6 Deficit Control Act of 1985 is amended by adding at the

7 end the following new subsection:
2

•HR 4975 IH

1 ‘‘(f) As used in this section, the term ‘receipts legisla2 tion’ shall not include that part of any implementing bill

3 for any trade agreement that changes, eliminates, or es4 tablishes any tariff of the United States.’’.

5 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM CERTAIN POINTS OF ORDER.

6 (a) TARIFF ENABLING LEGISLATION EXEMPTION.—

7 Title III of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 is

8 amended by adding at the end the following new section:

9 ‘‘TREATMENT OF TARIFF ENABLING LEGISLATION

10 ‘‘SEC. 314. The points of order set forth in sections

11 303(a), 311(a)(1), and 605 shall not apply to any imple12 menting bill for any trade agreement that changes, elimi13 nates, or establishes any tariff of the United States.’’.

14 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of sec15 tions set forth in section 1(b) of the Congressional Budget

16 and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 is amended by

17 adding after the item relating to section 313 the following

18 new item:

‘‘Sec. 314. Treatment of tariff enabling legislation.’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1



                              SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Chandler (U.S.A.), Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
W. Brent LaGere, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Mark C. Hart,
as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                           /s/ W. Brent LaGere
                                          --------------------------------
                                          W. Brent LaGere
                                          Chief Executive Officer
                                          November 13, 2006


                                          /s/ Mark C. Hart
                                          --------------------------------
                                          Mark C. Hart
                                          Chief Financial Officer
                                          November 13, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Chandler (U.S.A.), Inc. and will be retained by Chandler (U.S.A.),
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P251Engaging Police in Immigrant CommunitiesLaw enforcement faces many barriers to policing new immigrant communities and cultivating partnerships with these groups. Language barriers, immigrants' reluctance to report crime for fear of deportation, fear of police, federal immigration enforcement, and cultural differences, can lead to misunderstandings between law enforcement and community members. The Engaging Police in Immigrant Communities (EPIC) project highlights promising practices that law enforcement agencies nationwide are using to build effective police-immigrant relations. This guidebook is accompanied by podcasts on the same topic, as well as a website with additional materials and resources available through www.vera.org/epic.By Pradine Saint-Fort, Noelle Yasso, Susan ShahCategories: New Immigrant CommunitiesLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p251Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFBook • Oct 2012Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 05:19 (UTC-5) in 0.88 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
# EUR-Lex - 12002E101 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E101

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Three: Community policies - Title VII: Economic and monetary policy - Chapter 1: Economic policy - Article 101 - Article 104 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - Article 104 - EEC Treaty **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0072 - 0072 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0217 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0034 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Three: Community policies

Title VII: Economic and monetary policy

Chapter 1: Economic policy

Article 101

Article 104 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 104 - EEC Treaty

Article 101

1. Overdraft facilities or any other type of credit facility with the ECB or with the central banks of the Member States (hereinafter referred to as "national central banks") in favour of Community institutions or bodies, central governments, regional, local or other public authorities, other bodies governed by public law, or public undertakings of Member States shall be prohibited, as shall the purchase directly from them by the ECB or national central banks of debt instruments.

2. Paragraph 1 shall not apply to publicly owned credit institutions which, in the context of the supply of reserves by central banks, shall be given the same treatment by national central banks and the ECB as private credit institutions.
- TX 1967
Exhibit 10.18


TRAVELCENTERS OF AMERICA LLC


Summary of Director Compensation


The
following is a summary of the currently effective compensation of the directors
of TravelCenters of America LLC (the “Company”) for services as directors,
which is subject to modification at any time by the Board of Directors.


·                  Each
independent director receives an annual fee of $25,000, plus a fee of $500 per
day per board or committee meeting. Up to two $500 fees are payable if a board
meeting and one or more board committee meetings are held on the same date.


·                  The
chairpersons of the audit committee, the compensation committee and the
nominating and governance committee, each of whom is an independent director,
receive an additional annual fee of $7,500, $2,500 and $2,500, respectively.


·                  Each
director is entitled to receive a grant of 1,500 of the Company’s shares of
common stock on the date of the first board meeting following the spin off and
the date of the annual meeting of the shareholders commencing in 2008 (or, for
directors who are first elected or appointed at other times, on the day of the
first board meeting attended) valued at the closing price on the date of the
grant.


·                  The Company
generally reimburses all directors for reasonable out of pocket expenses
incurred in attending meetings of the board of directors or board committees on
which they serve
PART 2

INCORPORATED TEST PROCEDURE

(2005 – 2012 Model Years)

Small Off-Road Engines
State of California

AIR RESOURCES BOARD

CALIFORNIA EXHAUST EMISSION STANDARDS AND TEST PROCEDURES

FOR 2005-2012 AND LATER SMALL OFF-ROAD ENGINES

Adopted: July 26, 2004

Amended: February 24, 2010

Amended: October 25, 2012

Note: All existing language is indicated by plain type. All additions to the existing 

language are indicated by underlined type. All deletions to the existing 

language are indicated by strikeout. All other portions of this test procedure 

remain unchanged and are The symbols “* * * * * ” mean that the 

remainder text is unchanged. .
CALIFORNIA EXHAUST EMISSION STANDARDS AND TEST PROCEDURES

FOR 2005-2012 AND LATER SMALL OFF-ROAD ENGINES

The following provisions of Part 90, Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, as adopted 

or amended by the United State Environmental Protection Agency on the date listed, 

are adopted and incorporated herein by this reference for 2005 – 2012 model year and 

later small off-road engines as the California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test 

Procedures for 2005-2012 and Later Small Off-Road Engines, except as altered or 

replaced by the provisions set forth below.

PART 90 – CONTROL OF EMISSIONS FROM NONROAD SPARK-IGNITION 

ENGINES

SOURCE: 65 FR 24306, April 25, 2000, unless otherwise noted.

Subpart A – General

§ 90.1 Applicability.

DELETE,

REPLACE WITH:

(a) These provisions apply to 2005-2012 and later model year spark-ignition 

small off-road engines, and any equipment that use such engines. These 

provisions do not apply to all engines and equipment that fall within the scope 

of the preemption of Section 209(e)(1)(A) of the Federal Clean Air Act, as 

amended, and as defined by regulation of the Environmental Protection 

Agency.

* * * * *