alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Opinion issued August 15, 2023

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 22
- 0 0835
- CV

——————————— DURRAINE JONES , Appellant

V. STREETLANE HOMES , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1189601

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Durraine Jones, proceeding pro se, filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s October 31, 2022 judgment. A ppellant has failed to timely file a brief. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 38.6(a) (governing time to file brief).2

The clerk’s record was filed on January 13, 2023, and the reporter’s record was filed on March 23, 2023. Accordingly, appellant’s brief was due to be filed on or before April 24, 2023. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 38.6(a). Appellant did not file an appellant’s b rief. On May 2, 2023, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that this appeal was subject to dismissal unless a brief, or a motion to extend time to file a brief, was filed within ten days of the notice. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 38.8(a) (governing failure of appellant to file brief), 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal of appeal for want of prosecution), 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case for failure to comply with notice from Clerk of Court). Despite the notice that this appeal was subjec t to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. Accordingly, we dismiss th is appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(b), 43.2(f). A ll pending motions are dismissed as moot. PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Rivas

- Molloy, and Guerra

.
<PAGE>

                                     EXHIBIT 10.8

                             AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE


    This Amendment, dated as of March 4, 1997, is by and among IntraNet
Solutions, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (the "Maker") and CIRCLE F VENTURES,
LLC (the "Payee").

                                       RECITALS

    WHEREAS, the Maker executed that certain Promissory Note dated as of
December 23, 1996, made payable by the Maker to the order of the Payee in the
original face amount of Seven Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($750,000) (the
"Note"); and

    WHEREAS, the Maker and the Payee mutually agree to amend the Note in order
to extend the maturity date thereof;

    NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein,
and for other good and valuable consideration, the Maker and the Payee agree as
follows:

    1.   The Note shall be due and payable in full on January 15, 1998.

    2.   Except as specifically amended hereby, the Note shall remain in full
force and effect in accordance with its terms.

    3.   This Amendment shall not be construed as or be deemed to be a waiver
by the Payee of existing defaults by the Borrower, whether known or
undiscovered.

    4.   Upon execution hereof, the Payee will permanently attach this
Amendment to the Note, making it a part thereof.

                                            INTRANET SOLUTIONS, INC.


                                            By:  /s/ Robert F. Olson
                                                 -------------------------
                                            Its:      CEO
                                                 -------------------------


                                            CIRCLE F VENTURES, LLC


                                            By:  /s/ Daniel Cartwright
                                                 -------------------------
                                            Its:      CFO
                                                 -------------------------
§ 96.31 Aggregation of priority access licenses. ( a ) Priority Access Licensees may aggregate up to four PAL channels in any License Area at any given time.
( b ) The criteria in § 20.22(b) of this chapter will apply in order to attribute partial ownership and other interests for the purpose of applying the aggregation limit in paragraph (a) of this section.
[81 FR 49067, July 26, 2016]
# EUR-Lex - 11985I192 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11985I192

**DOCUMENTS CONCERNING THE ACCESSION OF THE KINGDOM OF SPAIN AND THE PORTUGUESE REPUBLIC TO THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, ACT CONCERNING THE CONDITIONS OF ACCESSION OF THE KINGDOM OF SPAIN AND THE PORTUGUESE REPUBLIC AND THE ADJUSTMENTS TO THE TREATIES, ARTICLE 192 **

*
Official Journal L 302 , 15/11/1985 P. 0082 *

++++

Article 192

The Portuguese Republic may suspend in whole or in part the levying of duties on products imported from the Community as at present constituted . It shall inform the other Member States and the Commission thereof .

The Council , acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission , may suspend in whole or in part the levying of duties on products imported from Portugal .
# EUR-Lex - 11997E086 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11997E086

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Amsterdam consolidated version) - Part Three: Community policies - Title VI: Common rules on competition, taxation and approximation of laws - Chapter 1: Rules on competition - Section 1: Rules applying to undertakings - Article 86 - Article 90 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - Article 90 - EEC Treaty **

*
Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0210 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0029 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Amsterdam consolidated version)

Article 86

1. In the case of public undertakings and undertakings to which Member States grant special or exclusive rights, Member States shall neither enact nor maintain in force any measure contrary to the rules contained in this Treaty, in particular to those rules provided for in Article 12 and Articles 81 to 89.

2. Undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest or having the character of a revenue-producing monopoly shall be subject to the rules contained in this Treaty, in particular to the rules on competition, insofar as the application of such rules does not obstruct the performance, in law or in fact, of the particular tasks assigned to them. The development of trade must not be affected to such an extent as would be contrary to the interests of the Community.

3. The Commission shall ensure the application of the provisions of this Article and shall, where necessary, address appropriate directives or decisions to Member States.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         121,798
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,414,796
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    495,960
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,556,257
<PP&E>                                       3,593,275
<DEPRECIATION>                                 978,051
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,012,992
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,390,022
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        75,236
<OTHER-SE>                                   (148,597)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,012,992
<SALES>                                     20,010,006
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,010,006
<CGS>                                       15,147,584
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,147,584
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,300,410
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             310,476
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,748,464)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,748,464)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,748,464)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.58)
        

</TABLE>
§ 510.7 Closed meetings. ( a ) Whenever the committee seeks to have all or a portion of a meeting closed to the public on the basis of an exemption provided in 5 U.S.C. 552(b), the Chairperson shall notify the Designee at least 30 days before the scheduled date of the meeting. The notification shall be in writing and shall specify all the reasons for closing any part of the meeting.
( b ) If, after consultation with the General Counsel of the Commission, the Designee finds the request to be warranted and in accordance with the policy of the Act, the request shall be granted. The determination of the Designee to grant any such request shall be in writing and shall state the specific reasons for closing all or a part of the meeting. Copies of the determination shall be made available to the public upon request.
<PAGE>

                                    EXHIBIT 10.17

                                   PROMISSORY NOTE

                                                          Minneapolis, Minnesota
$250,000                                                       December 20, 1996

    FOR VALUE RECEIVED, IntraNet Solutions, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (the
"Maker"), hereby unconditionally promises to pay to RITA M. OLSON, an individual
resident of the State of Minnesota, or her successors and assigns (the "Payee"),
at Minneapolis, Minnesota or at such other place or places as may be designated
by Payee from time to time, the sum of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars
($250,000) (the "Principal Sum").

    The Principal Sum plus interest thereon from the date hereof at a fixed
rate of nine percent (9%) per annum shall be due and payable on December 31,
1997 by Maker to Payee in any coin or currency of the United States of America
which, at the time of payment, is legal tender for the payment of public and
private debts.

    All payments on account of this Note, when paid, shall be applied first to
the payment of all interest then due on the unpaid balance of this Note and the
balance, if any, shall be applied to reduction of the unpaid balance of the
Principal Sum.  This Note may be prepaid in full or in part at any time without
premium.

    Maker agrees to pay on demand the costs of collection, including, without
limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees incurred by Payee in collecting or
attempting to collect any amount under this Note after the failure of Maker to
make any payment required to be made under this Note within ten (10) days after
written notice from Payee to Maker that such payment is due or to enforce its
rights under this Note.  All such costs of collection shall bear interest,
payable on demand, from the date of payment thereof by Payee until paid in full
by Maker at the rate applicable to the principal amount of this Note.

    Maker waives presentment, protest and demand, notice of protest, notice of
dishonor and non-payment of this Note, and expressly agrees that this Note, or
any payment hereunder, may be extended from time to time without in any way
affecting the liability of Maker.

    In the event Maker does not make when due any payment of the Principal Sum
or interest required to be made hereunder, Maker will pay, on demand, interest
on the amount of any overdue payment of the Principal Sum and interest for the
period following the due date, at a fixed rate of fifteen percent (15%).

    The terms, conditions and provisions of this Note shall be construed and
enforced according to the laws of the State of Minnesota.

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the duly authorized officer of Maker has caused this
Note to be executed on the date first above written.

                                            INTRANET SOLUTIONS, INC.


                                            By:  /s/ Jeffrey J. Sjobeck
                                                 ----------------------
                                            Its: Chief Financial Officer
                                                 -----------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM IDENTIFY
SPECIFIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH IDENTIFY FILING
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,825
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,427
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,576
<INVENTORY>                                      5,707
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,425
<PP&E>                                          48,460
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,293
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  53,457
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,240
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            51
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,332
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    53,457
<SALES>                                         66,951
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                66,951
<CGS>                                           54,545
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   64,999
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (1,409)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,968
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,393
<INCOME-TAX>                                       640
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                753
<DISCONTINUED>                                    (920)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (167)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
(see attached scope of accreditation for fields of testing and accredited test methods)Print Date: 09/29/2010Page 1 of 2This is to signify thatBERKELEY ANALYTICAL ASSOCIATES, LLC815 HARBOUR WAY SOUTH, UNIT 6RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA 94804Testing Laboratory TL-383(Revised August 6, 2010)has met the requirements of the IAS Accreditation Criteria for Testing Laboratories (AC89),has demonstrated compliancewith ANS/ISO/IEC Standard 17025:2005,General criteria for the competenceof testing and calibration laboratories, and hasbeen accredited, commencing April 22, 2010,for the test methods listed in the approved scopeof accreditation.Patrick V. McCullen C. P. Ramani, P.E.Vice President PresidentBerkeley Analytical Associates, LLC TL-383(Revised August 6, 2010)April 22, 2010Commencement Date C. P. Ramani, P.E.PresidentPrint Date: 09/29/2010Page 2 of 2Berkeley Analytical Associates, LLC Alfred T. Hodgson815 Harbour Way South, Unit 6 Research DirectorRichmond, CA 94804(510) 236-2325FIELDS OF TESTINGACCREDITED TEST METHODSFormaldehyde and chemical testing ASTM Standards D 5116, D 5197, D 6007, D 6670, D 6803 and D 7339;GGTM.P066.R8, ANSI/BIFMA M7.1-2007, U.S. EPA 1999 Compendium MethodTO-1, U.S. EPA, 1999, Compendium Method TO-17, CA/DHS/EHLB/R-174,2004, CPSC-CH-C1001-09.2, U.S. EPA Method 8270D and U.S. EPA Method3545A, ISO 16000-3, ISO 16000-6, ISO 16000-9 & ISO 16000-11;CDPH/EHLB/Standard Method V1.1
EXHIBIT
32.2: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of China Water Group, Inc. (the “Registrant”) certifies
that:



1.        The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



2.        The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Registrant.



|Date:  July 24, 2012 | /s/ Ding Rencai                      | 
|-------------------- | ------------------------------------ | 
|                     | Ding Rencai, Chief Financial Officer |
### The 11 photographs and one car plan view (picture 12) inthis document were

provided by Long Island Rail Road. No restrictions on use. Picture 1 - Long Island Rail Road C3 M 

## ulti- level Car Vestibule (incorrect titled Galley Car during the conference call). Picture 2 - Long Island Rail Road C3 M 

## ulti- level Car Vestibule (incorrect titled Galley Car during the conference call)Picture 3 - Long Island Rail Road C3 M 

## ulti- level Car Vestibule (incorrect titled Galley Car during the

conference call) Picture 4 – Long Island Rail Road M3 Commuter carPicture 5 - Long Island Rail Road M3 Commuter Car

Picture 6 - Long Island Rail Road M3 Commuter Car[Picture 7]

[Picture 8][Picture 9]

[Picture 10][Picture 11]

[Picture 12]
<page>				       EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Principal
Plus Fund L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Walter Davis,
President of Demeter Management Corporation, the general partner of
the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)		The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.







By:	/s/Walter Davis

Name:	   Walter Davis
Title:	   President

Date:	   March 23, 2007
# EUR-Lex - 11957E088 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957E088

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY, PART THREE - POLICY OF THE COMMUNITY, TITLE I - COMMON RULES, CHAPTER 1: RULES ON COMPETITION, SECTION 1: RULES APPLYING TO UNDERTAKINGS, ARTICLE 88 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 88

UNTIL THE ENTRY INTO FORCE OF THE PROVISIONS ADOPTED IN PURSUANCE OF ARTICLE 87 , THE AUTHORITIES IN MEMBER STATES SHALL RULE ON THE ADMISSIBILITY OF AGREEMENTS , DECISIONS AND CONCERTED PRACTICES AND ON ABUSE OF A DOMINANT POSITION IN THE COMMON MARKET IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW OF THEIR COUNTRY AND WITH THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE 85 , IN PARTICULAR PARAGRAPH 3 , AND OF ARTICLE 86 .
Case 16-26857 Doc 5 Filed 08/22/16 Entered 08/22/16 12:15:43 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-26857 Doc 5 Filed 08/22/16 Entered 08/22/16 12:15:43 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
#### § 260.79 Travel and other expenses.

Charges may be made to cover the cost of travel and other expenses incurred in connection with the performance of any inspection service, including appeal inspections: *Provided,* That, if charges for sampling or inspection are based on an hourly rate, an additional hourly charge may be made for travel time including time spent waiting for transportation as well as time spent traveling, but not to exceed 8 hours of travel time for any one person for any one day: *And provided further,* That, if travel is by common carrier, no hourly charge may be made for travel time outside the employee's official work hours.
[Civ. No. 7420.

Third Dist.

July 19, 1947.]

#### RAYMOND H. DUEHR et al., Appellants, v. CARL CALLAWAY et al., Respondents.

Ralph H. Lewis for Appellants.

McAllister & Johnson for Respondents.

THE COURT.

The respondents moved to dismiss the appeal in this case for failure on the part of appellants to prosecute their appeal. The notice of motion was served on appellants’ attorney, May 16, 1947. Notice of appeal to the Supreme Court, from a judgment which was rendered against plaintiffs, November 22, 1946, in Sacramento County, in a suit to quiet title to real property, was filed February 13,1947. The cause was transferred by the Supreme Court to this court on May 15,1947.  Appellants failed to appear in this court on the motion to dismiss the appeal, and.also failed to file a written opposition to the motion as required by rule 41 of Rules on Appeal.

*888Rule 41 (e) of Rules on Appeal provides that:

“Failure of an appellant to appear and oppose a motion to dismiss an appeal after due service of notice of motion, or to file a written opposition to the motion, may he deemed an abandonment of the appeal authorizing its dismissal.’’

We assume from the foregoing record that the appellants have abandoned their appeal in this case.

The motion is granted and the appeal is hereby dismissed.