alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON 10-QSB FOR
THE PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                            1887
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1887
<PP&E>                                            8000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    9887
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            21919
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         54250
<OTHER-SE>                                     (66282)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      9887
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 26393
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (26393)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
#### § 37.1 Purpose.

These regulations implement the requirement of section 1002(d) of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act, 94 Stat. 2450, as amended, 16 U.S.C. 3142(d), that the Secretary establish guidelines governing surface geological and geophysical exploration for oil and gas within the coastal plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Section 1002 mandates an oil and gas exploration program for the refuge's coastal plain. The program shall culminate in a report to Congress which contains, among other things, the identification of those areas within the coastal plain that have oil and gas production potential, an estimate of the volume of oil and gas concerned, the description of the wildlife, its habitat, and other resources that are within the areas identified, and an evaluation of the adverse effects that the carrying out of further exploration for, and the development and production of, oil and gas within such areas will have on the refuge's resources. It is the objective of this program to ascertain the best possible data and information concerning the probable existence, location, volume, and potential for further exploration, development, and production of oil and gas within the coastal plain without significantly adversely affecting the wildlife, its habitat, or the environment and without unnecessary duplication of exploratory activities. These regulations prescribe the requirements and procedures for obtaining authorization for and the conduct of such exploratory activities, and for submitting to the Department the resulting data and information. These regulations also describe other matters relating to the administration of the program.
WHAT IS THE DELTA LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE

EXECUTIVE ACADEMY?

The Delta Leadership Institute Executive Academy was created to empower 

a corps of leaders with the tools, experiences, and networks to address 

challenges facing the local and regional economic development. The DLI 

Executive Academy trains leaders from diverse backgrounds, sectors, and 

industries to improve the economic competitiveness and social viability of 

the Mississippi River Delta and Alabama Black Belt.

SESSIONS COVER POLICY AREAS AND SKILLS SUCH AS:

WHO MAY APPLY FOR THIS PROGRAM?

Applicants for the Executive Academy must live or work in the 252 counties and parishes of the Mississippi 

River Delta and Alabama Black Belt Regions, as designated by Congress. The DLI Executive Academy 

continuously seeks applicants that serve in either traditional or non-traditional leadership roles within 

organizations, companies, or communities. It is expected that DLI Executive Academy Fellows have 

previously worked on community-based projects that support economic and community development efforts 

on the local, regional, or state level.

HOW ARE EXECUTIVE ACADEMY FELLOWS SELECTED?

The DLI Executive Academy participants are selected by the applicants’ state Governor or DRA’s Federal 

Co-Chairman. DRA and the Governors will evaluate and make selections from the completed applications 

submitted by the application deadline. For more information on applying, visit our website and FAQ’s 

at dra.gov/leadership.

Delta Leadership Institute (DLI)

Executive Academy

TOOLS

Expand skills and knowledge

in policy areas relevant to 

economic and community 

development that enhance your 

ability to improve your community.

EXPERIENCES

Visit Delta communities and learn 

the strategies that are helping to 

grow local economies in diverse 

cities and towns throughout the 

Region.

NETWORKS

Build network with fellow 

community leaders, practitioners, 

and experts to develop a strong 

network for regional collaboration, 

information sharing, and continued 

learning.

Regionalism Infrastructure

Public-Private 

Partnerships Public 

Health

Transportation Grassroots 

Organizing Entrepreneurship

Place-based Development

Public Policy & Governance 

Culture & Tourism 

Workforce Development 

Coalition Building

dra.gov

Creating Jobs. Building Communities. Improving Lives.

ALABAMA • ARKANSAS • ILLINOIS • KENTUCKY • LOUISIANA • MISSISSIPPI • MISSOURI • TENNESSEE
WHAT IS THE DELTA LEADERSHIP NETWORK?

The Delta Leadership Network (DLN) comprises all alumni of the Delta 

Leadership Executive Academy. Alumni may continue their engagement 

and support of the region through this network. DLN is currently 600 

members strong.

WHO CAN ANSWER QUESTIONS?

L. Nicole Stringfellow

Leadership Development Program 

Manager

O: 662-624-8600

M: 662-966-4208

LStringfellow@dra.gov

For more information, visit dra.gov/leadership.

Delta Leadership Institute (DLI)

Alumni Network

dra.gov

Creating Jobs. Building Communities. Improving Lives.

ALABAMA • ARKANSAS • ILLINOIS • KENTUCKY • LOUISIANA • MISSISSIPPI • MISSOURI • TENNESSEE
Skip to content

- Home
- About    - 2020 Federal View Point Survey Results
  - About DTIC
  - Administrator
  - Announcements
  - Contact Us
  - DTIC’s Past and Future
  - DTIC Strategic Plan
  - Employment
  - Sitemap 
- Products & Services    - DTIC’s Products & Services
  - DTIC Registration Benefits
  - DTIC Combatant Command (CCMD) Classified Reading Room
  - Training 
- Submit Documents
- Sign In
- Operating Status

Defense Technical Information Center

*Search this site, DoD S&T Reports, and more..*

**Internet Explorer Users:**
DISMISS

To learn more, watch one of our product demo or overview videos. 

### **Spotlight: Defense Articles**

Return to Spotlights

## DTIC publishes special edition of peer-reviewed scientific journal JDR&E

					November 12, 2020				

DTIC publishes special edition of peer-reviewed scientific journal JDR&E.

## CUI marking framework guidance now available.

					November 10, 2020				

Guidance on the new CUI markings framework.

## EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY: New submission requirements for DoD-funded journal articles

					September 24, 2020				

## House Appropriations Committee Report on the Defense Appropriations Act for FY2021

					July 21, 2020				

House Appropriations Committee Report

## DTIC posts the House Armed Services Committee report on the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021

					July 16, 2020				

House Armed Services Committee Report

                                                                - 1
                                                                - 2
                                                                - 3
                                                                - ...
                                                                - 7
                                                                - Next »

Load More

**DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER**

8725 John J. Kingman RoadFort Belvoir, Virginia 22060-6218(800) 225-3842https://Discover.DTIC.mil

- Administrator
- Contact Us
- DoD Privacy Program
- EEO
- Employment
- FOIA
- Information Analysis Centers
- Information Quality
- Legal
- Mission Statement
- No FEAR Act
- Open Government
- Plain Language
- Policy Memoranda
- Privacy Policy
- SAPR
- Strategic Plan
- Submit Documents
- USA.gov
- USD(R&E)
**
LinkedIn **

NOTICE:  The appearance of hyperlinks does not constitute endorsement by the DTIC of non-U.S. Government sites or the information, products, or services contained therein.  Although the DTIC may or may not use these sites as additional distribution channels for Department of Defense information, it does not exercise editorial control over all of the information that you may find at these locations.  Such hyperlinks are provided consistent with the stated purpose of this website. The DTIC bears no responsibility for the accuracy, legality or content of the external website or for that of subsequent links. Contact the external website for answers to questions regarding its content. Please let us know about existing external links which you believe are inappropriate.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5100 

To amend the Commodity Exchange Act to prohibit political election or 

contest agreements, contracts, transactions, and swaps. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2024 

Mr. MERKLEY (for himself, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, and Mr. WHITEHOUSE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Commodity Exchange Act to prohibit political 

election or contest agreements, contracts, transactions, 

and swaps. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ban Gambling on Elec5 tions Act of 2024’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 5100 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON POLITICAL ELECTION OR CON2 TEST AGREEMENTS, CONTRACTS, TRANS3 ACTIONS, AND SWAPS. 

4 Section 5c(c)(5) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 

5 U.S.C. 7a–2(c)(5)) is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following: 

7 ‘‘(D) PROHIBITION RELATING TO POLIT8 ICAL ELECTIONS OR CONTESTS.—Notwith9 standing any other provision of this section, no 

10 agreement, contract, transaction, or swap in11 volving any political election or contest (or any 

12 index, measure, value, or data related thereto, 

13 or occurrence, extent of an occurrence, or con14 tingency based thereon) may be listed or made 

15 available for clearing or trading on or through 

16 a registered entity.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Enxnet, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), We, Ryan Corley, Chief Executive Officer and Stephen Hoelscher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                        |  |                        
|Date: November 14, 2006 |  | /s/Ryan Corley         
|                        |  | Ryan Corley            
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                        |  |                        
|Date: November 14, 2006 |  | /s/Stephen Hoelscher   
|                        |  | Stephen Hoelscher      
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer
|                        |  |
United ~tatcs ~enate 

WASHINGTON, DC 20510 

March 3, 2009 

The Honorable Jeff Bingaman The Honorable Lisa Murkowski 

Chairman Ranking Member 

Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

United States Senate United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20510 

Dear Senators Bingaman and Murkowski, 

We understand that you intend to introduce legislation to implement a national 

renewable electricity standard. As you think about how to transition our nation toward cleaner 

energy production, we urge you to consider including less-traditional, but nonetheless effective, 

non-fossil fuel energy sources — like waste-to-energy — in your bill's definition of the term 

"renewable." 

Waste-to-energy can provide double benefits: it diminishes waste reserves and 

produces clean energy while offsetting greenhouse gas emissions. As our nation's energy 

needs grow and we continue to discern how best to meet them, we think it is important to take 

an inclusive view of the ways in which already-existing technologies can be used to reduce our 

dependence on fossil fuels. 

The nation's 87 waste-to-energy facilities safely manage approximately 29 million tons of 

household refuse each year, and they have an electric capacity of 2,700 megawatts. Each one 

operates pursuant to environmentally rigorous Maximum Achievable Controi Technology 

(MACT) standards. Through the combustion of waste that would have otherwise been 

landfilled, these facilities decrease our reliance on fossil-fuel fired electric generation. 

Waste-to-energy is already considered a renewabie energy source by states across the 

country and nations around the world. For that reason and the ones articulated above, we urge 

you to consider including waste-to-energy in your bill's definition of the term "renewable." 

This Congress, we have an opportunity to promote the development of clean, renewable 

energy sources that will simultaneously reduce our dependence on foreign oil and curb our 

nation's greenhouse gas emissions while creating jobs and supporting American technological 

innovation. It would only help us meet our clean energy production goals to think broadly about 

what types of energy are considered renewable, understanding that stringent environmental 

standards must remain paramount in any such assessment. We look forward to working with 

you to accomplish that task. 

i Cerely, 

o , 

-. .._ 

~ Joseph I. Lieberman Christopher podd Daniel K. Akaka 

U.S. SENATOR U.S. SENATOR U.S SENATOR 

/ 
~ 

0 

r~ 

r ~ 

Benjamin L. Cardin 

U.S. SENATOR 

Robert P. Casey, Jr. Ron Wyde 

U.S. SENATOR U.S. SEN OR 

Bill Nelson Charles chumer 

U.S. SENATOR U.S. SENATOR 

ra k R. au er 

U.S. SENATOR 

Fi Spedvdste 

SENATOR eyiel'Si 

Kirsten E. Gillibrand 

U.S. SENATOR 

. ~ 

Susan M. Collins 

U.S. SENATOR
Case 16-28716 Doc 1 Filed 09/08/16 Entered 09/08/16 10:09:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 9
Case 16-28716 Doc 1 Filed 09/08/16 Entered 09/08/16 10:09:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 9
Case 16-28716 Doc 1 Filed 09/08/16 Entered 09/08/16 10:09:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 9
Case 16-28716 Doc 1 Filed 09/08/16 Entered 09/08/16 10:09:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 9
Case 16-28716 Doc 1 Filed 09/08/16 Entered 09/08/16 10:09:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 9
Case 16-28716 Doc 1 Filed 09/08/16 Entered 09/08/16 10:09:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 9
Case 16-28716 Doc 1 Filed 09/08/16 Entered 09/08/16 10:09:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 9
Case 16-28716 Doc 1 Filed 09/08/16 Entered 09/08/16 10:09:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 9
Case 16-28716 Doc 1 Filed 09/08/16 Entered 09/08/16 10:09:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 9
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                        Subsidiaries of the Registrant
                        ------------------------------

PLASMA & MATERIALS TECHNOLOGIES (KOREA) CO., LTD., a Korean corporation

PLASMA & MATERIALS TECHNOLOGIES, JAPAN KK, a Japanese corporation

TRIKON TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, an English corporation

TRIKON EQUIPMENTS LIMITED, an English corporation

ELECTROTECH (ASIA) LIMITED, an English corporation

ELECTROTECH INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, an English corporation

E.T. FABRICATIONS LIMITED, an English corporation

E.T. ELECTROTECH RESEARCH LIMITED, an English corporation

E.T. EQUIPMENTS LIMITED, an English corporation

VACUUM CONTROL SYSTEMS LTD., an English corporation

TRIKON TECHNOLOGIES, GmbH, a German limited liability company

TRIKON TECHNOLOGIES, SARL, a French limited liability company

PMT U.S. HOLDINGS, INC. ("US HOLDINGS"), a California corporation

ENERGY TRANSFER SYSTEMS INC., a Delaware corporation

PMT FOREIGN SALES CORPORATION

TRIKON HOLDINGS LIMITED ("UK HOLDINGS"), an English and Welsh corporation

CVD, INC., a California corporation

PMT CVD PARTNERS, L.P., a California general partnership
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

In Re: ) BK No.:

)

) Chapter:

)

)

)

Debtor(s) )

Willie L Suggs, Jr.

16-27237

13

Eastern Division

Honorable Donald R. Cassling

 ORDER MODIFYING THE PLAN POST CONFIRMATION

THIS MATTER coming to be heard on the DEBTOR'S MOTION TO MODIFY, the Court

having jurisdiction, with due notice having been given to all parties in interest, the Court orders as

follows:

IT IS SO ORDERED:

 Debtor's current Chapter 13 Plan is modified post-confirmation to defer the current trustee default to

the end of the Plan.

Honorable Donald R. Cassling

Enter:

Dated: October 18, 2018 United States Bankruptcy Judge

David H. Cutler, esq.

Cutler & Associates, Ltd.

4131 Main Street

Skokie, IL 60076

Phone: (847) 673-8600

Prepared by:

Case 16-27237 Doc 47 Filed 10/18/18 Entered 10/19/18 07:41:27 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲

▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

05/30

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 30 May 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.06 N 76.88 W Meters AGL
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-3143 

_____________________________

LARRY L. DORTLY, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County.

Melissa G. Olin, Judge.

July 31, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, RAY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Larry L. Dortly, Jr., pro se, Appellant.
2

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Michael Layton Schaub, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
[No. 1949.]

#### Sam Watson *v.*The State.

1. Practice.— Appeal Bond from the justice’s to the county court which requires the personal appearance of the defendant at the next term of the county court imposes a condition not required by the statute, and makes the bond more onerous than a statutory appeal bond.

8, Same — Surplusage,— If an appeal bond in a criminal cause contains a condition not required by the Code of Procedure, it cannot be treated as mere surplusage.

3. Same — Right or Appeal.— The right of appeal in such cases is not available to a defendant unless he flies with the justice of the peace a valid statutory appeal bond enforceable against him and his sureties.

*383[Opinion delivered February 20, 1886.]

Appeal from the County Court of Brazoria. Tried below before the Hon. H. Masterson, County Judge.

The opinion discloses the entire case.

*J. E. Eorris,*for the appellant.

*J. E.*Burts, Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

Willson, Judge.

Defendant was convicted in a justice’s court of an assault, and was fined $5. He appealed to the county court, where his appeal, upon motion of the county attorney, was dismissed upon the ground that the appeal bond was more onerous than the law required, in that it was conditioned for the “ personal appearance ” of the defendant before the county court. In all other respects the bond is in proper form, and conditioned in accordance with the statute. (Code Crim. Proc., arts. 854-5; Will. Cr. Forms, 810, p. 391.)

Said condition in the bond which requires the defendant “to make his personal appearance before the next regular term of the county court,” etc., and “ from day to day thereafter, and not depart from said county court,” etc., is certainly a condition which is not required by the statute, and renders the bond more onerous than a statutory appeal bond in such cases. It has uniformly been held in this State that a statutory bond must, in every essential particular, conform to the statute, and when it contains a condition more onerous than required by the statute the bond is a nullity; and that a condition in a bond not required by the statute cannot be treated as surplus-age. *(Turner*v. *The State,*14 Texas Ct. App., 168, and cases therein cited.)

While it was the defendant’s right to appeal from the justice’s judgment, it devolved upon him, in order to avail himself of such right, to file with the justice a valid appeal bond, such as is required by the statute,TM such as would, in case of forfeiture thereof, support a judgment against him and his sureties. Having failed to file such a bond, the defendant has no just cause of complaint against the judgment of the court dismissing his anneal • and said judgment is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
No. 10-1478.

#### Henry et ux. *v.*Jefferson County Commission et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section
                     906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I, Michael Timms, Chief Executive Officer and President of Australian Forest
Industries (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
March 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: June 21, 2006

/s/ Michael Timms
---------------------------
Michael Timms
Chief Executive Officer and President


                                       12