alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 10.17

                              ISLAND PACIFIC, INC.

                              FOLSOM LEASE SUMMARY

Lease Date:                        September 6, 2005

Landlord:                          Fairfield Investors, L.P

Address of Landlord:               1111 Howe Avenue
                                   Sacramento, CA 95825

Premises:                          Approximately 13,519 square feet

Premises Address:                  400 Plaza Drive, Suite200
                                   Folsom, CA 95630

Term:                              6 Years

Monthly Rent:                      April 1, 2007 - March 31, 2008      $20,954
                                   April 1, 2008 - March 31, 2009      $21,630
                                   April 1, 2009 - March 31, 2010      $22,306
                                   April 1, 2010 - March 31, 2011      $22,982

Estimated Operating Expenses:      $2,700 per month

Tenant's Percentage:               31%

Cash Security Deposit:             $22,982
# EUR-Lex - 11957A038 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957A038

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY ( E.A.E.C. - EURATOM ), TITLE TWO - PROVISIONS FOR THE ENCOURAGEMENT OF PROGRESS IN THE FIELD OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, CHAPTER III: HEALTH AND SAFETY, ARTICLE 38 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 38

THE COMMISSION SHALL MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE MEMBER STATES WITH REGARD TO THE LEVEL OF RADIOACTIVITY IN THE AIR , WATER AND SOIL .

IN CASES OF URGENCY , THE COMMISSION SHALL ISSUE A DIRECTIVE REQUIRING THE MEMBER STATE CONCERNED TO TAKE , WITHIN A PERIOD LAID DOWN BY THE COMMISSION , ALL NECESSARY MEASURES TO PREVENT INFRINGEMENT OF THE BASIC STANDARDS AND TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATIONS .

SHOULD THE STATE IN QUESTION FAIL TO COMPLY WITH THE COMMISSION DIRECTIVE WITHIN THE PERIOD LAID DOWN , THE COMMISSION OR ANY MEMBER STATE CONCERNED MAY FORTHWITH , BY WAY OF DEROGATION FROM ARTICLES 141 AND 142 , BRING THE MATTER BEFORE THE COURT OF JUSTICE .
U.S. Department of Justice 

Office of Community Oriented Policing Services 

 Fact Sheet www.cops.usdoj.gov

National Blue Alert Network
 

History 

In 2015, Congress passed the Rafael Ramos and 

Wenjian Liu National Blue Alert Act, named in 

honor of two New York City police officers killed in 

an ambush attack on December 20, 2014. The Act 

establishes a voluntary nationwide system to give police 

an early warning of threats against police officers and 

to aid in the apprehension of suspects who have killed 

or seriously injured an officer. In 2016, the COPS 

Office was asked to implement the Blue Alert Act and 

establish a National Blue Alert Network. 

Blue
Alerts


Blue Alerts provide for rapid dissemination of 

information to law enforcement agencies, media, 

and the public about violent offenders who have 

killed, seriously injured, or pose an imminent and 

credible threat to law enforcement. Blue Alerts can 

be transmitted via wireless devices and through the 

Emergency Alert System (EAS). The National Blue Alert 

Network works to encourage, enhance, and integrate 

Blue Alert plans throughout the United States. 

Blue Alert Activation Criteria 

Blue Alerts may be issued in any of the following 

circumstances, provided there is actionable information 

known about a suspect (e.g., name, physical description, or 

vehicle description): 

• When a law enforcement officer is killed or seriously injured in 

the line of duty 

• When an officer is missing in connection with official duties 

• When there is an imminent and credible threat to kill or 

seriously injure a law enforcement officer 

Blue Alert Resources 

The COPS Office provides resources and technical 

assistance to states, law enforcement agencies, and 

other stakeholders seeking to establish or enhance 

an existing Blue Alert plan. The National Blue Alert 

Network also maintains a secure data repository, for 

law enforcement only, containing many Blue Alert 

resources collected from around the nation, including 

examples of legislation, policies, forms, and a directory 

of state Blue Alert officials. 

For more information, visit the COPS Office website 

at www.cops.usdoj.gov/bluealert, email the COPS 

Office at BlueAlert@usdoj.gov, or call the COPS Office 

Response Center at 800-421-6770. 

Other Resources 

Federal Emergency Management Agency Integrated Public 

Alerting and Warning System (IPAWS) 

https://www.fema.gov/integrated-public-alert-warning-system 

Federal Communications Commission Emergency Alert 

System (EAS) 

https://www.fcc.gov/general/emergency-alert-system-eas 

Photo: 101cats/iStock 

November 2018
###### Editorial Note on Part 11

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 11 appear at 67 FR 38208, June 3, 2002.

#### § 11.17 Payment of final assessment.

When a final administrative decision becomes effective in accordance with this part 11, the respondent shall have 20 calendar days from the date of the final administrative decision within which to make full payment of the penalty assessed. Payment will be timely only if received in Office of the Director during normal business hours, on or before the 20th day. Upon a failure to pay the penalty, the Solicitor of the Department may request the Attorney General to institute a civil action in the U.S. District Court to collect the penalty.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.01

              CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-74712, 33-83858 and 33-07795) pertaining to the 1985 Stock
Option Plan, 1991 Executive Stock Option Plan, 1993 Equity Incentive Plan, 1993
Directors Stock Option Plan and 1993 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of VERITAS
Software Corporation of our report dated January 31, 1997, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of VERITAS Software Corporation
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.

                                                ERNST & YOUNG LLP







San Jose, California
March 14, 1997
[Cite as State v. Robinson , 2015-Ohio-3486.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO

TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

State of Ohio, :

Plaintiff-Appellee, :

v. : No. 13AP-563 (C.P.C. No. 12CR-1868) William L. Robinson, : (REGULAR CALENDAR) Defendant-Appellant. :

D E C I S I O N

Rendered on August 27, 2015

Ron O'Brien , Prosecuting Attorney, and Michael P. Walton

, for appellee.

Jeffrey A. Berndt , for appellant.

ON APPLICATION FOR DELAYED REOPENING

TYACK, J

. {¶ 1} William Leslie Robinson, Jr., has filed an application seeking to reopen his direct appeal. Robinson's initial appeal begun in 2013 and concluded in 2014. The time allowed for him to pursue an App.R. 26(B) application for reopening was 90 days from the date the appeal was decided. That 90 days lapsed over one year ago, our judgment having been rendered in February 2014. {¶ 2} Robinson has not presented a reasonable explanation for his failure to comply with the applicable time limit. Stated directly, he has not shown good cause for his delay. For that reason alone, his application must be denied. {¶ 3} The allegation that Robinson sent a prior application for reopening to the Supreme Court of Ohio does not constitute a valid excuse for the delay, assuming theNo. 13AP-563 2

allegation is true. Robinson should have known that the application needed to be filed with the court which decided his appeal, not some other court. {¶ 4} Robinson and his family apparently were having difficulty communicating with Robinson's appellate counsel. Part of the difficulty seems to center on the fact that Robinson was trying to tell his lawyer how to handle his case. {¶ 5} Appellate counsel provided Robinson with copies of the appellate briefs in a timely fashion. As a result, if Robinson and his family felt that other issues should be raised and argued, they had the opportunity to notify counsel or this court of the additional issues before the case was submitted to a panel of the court for a decision. {¶ 6} Ineffective assistance of counsel, either trial counsel or appellate counsel, can only be shown by meeting the very high standards set by Strickland v. Washington

, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). Robinson was convicted based upon eyewitness testimony supported by DNA evidence. Nothing before us indicates that the jury reached the wrong result when it found Robinson guilty of aggravated burglary and sexual battery. Nothing before us indicates that any of his lawyers rendered ineffective assistance. {¶ 7} The application for delayed reopening is denied. Application for delayed reopening denied.

SADLER and HORTON, JJ., concur.
**Read more of the December Dispatch**
    - Policing Reimagined as Customer Service
    - 988: Working with the New Mental Health Crisis Number 
    - Finding Effective Assistance – The Approved Provider Bulletin 
    - When (Not If) a Crisis Hits Your Agency, Will You Be Ready?
§ 221.40 What are the requirements for prehearing conferences? ( a ) *Initial prehearing conference.* The ALJ will conduct an initial prehearing conference with the parties at the time specified in the notice under § 221.30, on or about the 20th day after the effective date stated in the referral notice under § 221.26(c)(4), 7 CFR 1.626(c)(4), or 43 CFR 45.26(c)(4). ( 1 ) The initial prehearing conference will be used: ( i ) To identify, narrow, and clarify the disputed issues of material fact and exclude issues that do not qualify for review as factual, material, and disputed;
( ii ) To consider the parties' motions for discovery under § 221.41 and to set a deadline for the completion of discovery;
( iii ) To discuss the evidence on which each party intends to rely at the hearing;
( iv ) To set deadlines for submission of written testimony under § 221.52 and exchange of exhibits to be offered as evidence under § 221.54; and
( v ) To set the date, time, and place of the hearing.
( 2 ) The initial prehearing conference may also be used: ( i ) To discuss limiting and grouping witnesses to avoid duplication;
( ii ) To discuss stipulations of fact and of the content and authenticity of documents;
( iii ) To consider requests that the ALJ take official notice of public records or other matters;
( iv ) To discuss the submission of written testimony, briefs, or other documents in electronic form; and
( v ) To consider any other matters that may aid in the disposition of the case.
( b ) *Other conferences.* The ALJ may in his or her discretion direct the parties to attend one or more other prehearing conferences, if consistent with the need to complete the hearing process within 90 days. Any party may by motion request a conference.
( c ) *Notice.* The ALJ must give the parties reasonable notice of the time and place of any conference. A conference will ordinarily be held by telephone, unless the ALJ orders otherwise.
( d ) *Preparation.* ( 1 ) Each party's representative must be fully prepared to discuss all issues pertinent to that party that are properly before the conference, both procedural and substantive. The representative must be authorized to commit the party that he or she represents respecting those issues.
( 2 ) Before the date set for the initial prehearing conference, the parties' representatives must make a good faith effort: ( i ) To meet in person, by telephone, or by other appropriate means; and
( ii ) To reach agreement on discovery and the schedule of remaining steps in the hearing process.
( e ) *Failure to attend.* Unless the ALJ orders otherwise, a party that fails to attend or participate in a conference, after being served with reasonable notice of its time and place, waives all objections to any agreements reached in the conference and to any consequent orders or rulings.
( f ) *Scope.* During a conference, the ALJ may dispose of any procedural matters related to the case.
( g ) *Order.* Within 2 days after the conclusion of each conference, the ALJ must issue an order that recites any agreements reached at the conference and any rulings made by the ALJ during or as a result of the conference.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 182 (Wednesday, September 20, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 54992]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7984]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Board of Scientific Counselors, National Institute for 
Occupational Safety and Health: Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Public Law 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the following committee meeting:

    Name: Board of Scientific Counselors (BSC), National Institute 
for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH).
    Time and Date: 9 a.m.-2:45 p.m., October 18, 2006.
    Place: The Watergate Hotel, 2650 Virginia Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20037.
    Status: Open to the public, limited only by the space available. 
The meeting room accommodates approximately 50 people.
    Purpose: The Board shall provide advice to the Director, NIOSH 
on research and prevention programs. Specifically, the Board shall 
provide guidance on the Institute's research activities related to 
developing and evaluating hypotheses, systematically documenting 
findings and disseminating results. The Board shall evaluate the 
degree to which the activities of NIOSH conform to appropriate 
scientific standards; address current and relevant needs; and 
produce intended results.
    Matters To Be Discussed: Agenda items include a health hazard 
evaluation program review, an update on the economics of 
occupational safety and health, and an update on flavorings-related 
lung disease prevention efforts.
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.
    Contact Person For More Information: Roger Rosa, Executive 
Secretary, BSC, NIOSH, 200 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 715H, 
Washington, DC 20201, telephone (202) 205-7856, fax (202) 260-4464.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and 
Disease Registry.

    Dated: September 13, 2006.
Alvin Hall,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
 [FR Doc. 06-7984 Filed 9-19-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
# EUR-Lex - 11957E/PRO/BEI/20 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957E/PRO/BEI/20

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY, PROTOCOL ON THE STATUTE OF THE EUROPEAN INVESTMENT BANK, ARTICLE 20 **

*

*

++++

Article 20

In its loan and guarantee operations , the Bank shall observe the following principles :

1 . It shall ensure that its funds are employed as rationally as possible in the interests of the Community .

It may grant loans or guarantees only :

( a ) where , in the case of projects carried out by undertakings in the production sector , interest and amortisation payments are covered out of operating profits or , in other cases , either by a commitment entered into by the State in which the project is carried out or by some other means ; and

( b ) where the execution of the project contributes to an increase in economic productivity in general and promotes the attainment of the common market .

2 . It shall neither acquire any interest in an undertaking nor assume any responsibility in its management unless this is required to safeguard the rights of the Bank in ensuring recovery of funds lent .

3 . It may dispose of its claims on the capital market and may , to this end , require its debtors to issue bonds or other securities .

4 . Neither the Bank nor the Member States shall impose conditions requiring funds lent by the Bank to be spent within a specified Member State .

5 . The Bank may make its loans conditional on international invitations to tender being arranged .

6 . The Bank shall not finance , in whole or in part , any project opposed by the Member State in whose territory it is to be carried out .
Case 16-29059 Doc 16 Filed 10/07/16 Entered 10/12/16 07:42:03 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
Successful Practices & Strategies

Guidelines for Agency Submissions

The COPS Office would like to hear from you! We would like to consider featuring your success story or successful 

community policing strategies and lessons learned on our website to share with other law enforcement agencies across 

the country. To tell us about successes related to your COPS Office grant, please complete the information below and 

attach an additional sheet as necessary (not to exceed 1–2 pages). 

Please send your agency’s submission by e-mail to the COPS Office’s Community Policing Outreach (CPO) section, and 

COPS Office staff will contact you regarding your submission. You may also call CPO at 1-800-421-6770. 

Agency details

Agency name: Submission date: 

URL to agency’s homepage: City, State:

COPS grant program: Year funded: ORI #: 

Agency’s submission exemplifies the following community policing element

☐ Community Partnerships ☐ Problem Solving ☐ Organizational Transformation

Problem/issue

Problem description (1–2 sentences)

Community policing strategies implemented

Change and/or impact as a result of these community policing efforts 

(including who benefited from the change/impact)

Lessons learned through program implementation
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About Crop I... 
-  National Fac... 
-  California State Profile - 2023 

## About Crop Insurance

        -  Managing Your Farm Risk            -  Insurance Plans 
          -  Insurance Cycle              -  Application Process 
            -  Coverage and Billing 
            -  Claims Process 
            -  Program Changes 
          -  Obligations and Expectations 
          -  Resources 
        -  Beginning or Veteran Farmers 
        -  Urban Farmers 
        -  Highlighted Initiatives and Plans            -  Beginners Guide to Crop Insurance 
          -  Conservation 
          -  Controlled Environment 
          -  Cover Crops 
          -  Double Cropping 
          -  Emergency and Natural Disaster Relief 
          -  Fire Insurance Protection – Smoke Index 
          -  Hemp 
          -  Hurricane Insurance Protection - Wind Index 
          -  Nursery              -  Nursery Value Select 
          -  Organic Crops              -  Contract Price Addendum Eligibility by Commodity 
            -  Organic Premium Price Elections Available by Commodity 
            -  Steps to Success 
          -  Policyholder Bill of Rights 
          -  Prevented Planting 
          -  Shellfish 
          -  Specialty Crops              -  2023 Expansions of Specialty Crops Programs 
            -  2022 Expansion of Specialty Crops Programs 
            -  2021 Expansions of Specialty Crops Programs 
            -  2020 Expansions of Specialty Crops Programs 
            -  2019 Expansions of Specialty Crops Programs 
          -  Whole-Farm Revenue Protection 
        -  Fact Sheets 
        -  Frequently Asked Questions 
        -  Farm Bill 
        -  Outreach and Education            -  Partnership Projects 
          -  Pilot Projects 
          -  Success Stories and Program Impact 
          -  Past Webinars 

# California State Profile - 2023

migrationTue, 05/07/2024 - 20:19

View PDF

Download 2023 California State Profile (PDF)

All multi-peril crop insurance, including Catastrophic Risk Protection policies, are available from private crop insurance agents. A list of insurance agents is available online using the RMA Agent Locator.
117 STAT. 1198 PUBLIC LAW 108–102—OCT. 29, 2003

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3229:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 149 (2003):

Oct. 7, considered and passed House.

Oct. 15, considered and passed House.

Æ

Public Law 108–102

108th Congress

An Act

To amend title 44, United States Code, to transfer to the Public Printer the authority

over the individuals responsible for preparing indexes of the Congressional Record,

and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRANSFER TO PUBLIC PRINTER OF AUTHORITY OVER

INDIVIDUALS RESPONSIBLE FOR PREPARING CONGRESSIONAL RECORD INDEXES.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 902 of title 44, United States Code,

is amended to read as follows:

‘‘§ 902. Congressional Record: Indexes

‘‘The Public Printer shall prepare the semimonthly and the

session index to the Congressional Record. The Joint Committee

on Printing shall direct the form and manner of its publication

and distribution.’’.

(b) TRANSITION RULE FOR CURRENT EMPLOYEES.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—Any individual who is an employee of

the Congressional Record Index Office as of the effective date

of this Act shall be transferred to the Government Printing

Office, subject to the provisions of this title governing the

selection and appointment of employees of the Government

Printing Office and any applicable regulations.

(2) TREATMENT OF ACCRUED LEAVE.—Any annual and sick

leave accrued by such an individual prior to such date shall

be transferred and made available to the individual as an

employee of the Government Printing Office, subject to

applicable regulations of the Government Printing Office governing the use of such leave.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall apply

with respect to pay periods beginning on or after October 1, 2003

(or, if later, the first day of the first month which begins after

the date of the enactment of this Act).

Approved October 29, 2003.

Applicability.

44 USC 902 note.

44 USC 902 note.

Oct. 29, 2003

[H.R. 3229]