alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly report of China Evergreen Environmental Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Chong Liang Pu and Ren Cai Ding, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



May 23, 2005                             /s/  Chong Liang Pu
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         Chong Liang Pu,
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer


                                         /s/  Ren Cai Ding
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         Ren Cai Ding,
                                         Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.1
  
  SUBJECT:
    
    Evaluation of Oil and Gas ReservesTo the Interests of Everflow Eastern Partners, L.P.In Certain Properties Located in Various StatesPursuant to the Requirements of theSecurities and Exchange CommissionEffective December 31, 2009Job 09.1148
  TotalEverflow Eastern
    
    Proved Developed
    
    
    ProvedPartners, L.P.
    
    Producing
    
    
    Nonproducing
    
    
    DevelopedSEC Parameters
    
    (PDP)
    
    
    (PDNP)
    
    
    (PDP & PDNP)Net Reserves to the
Evaluated InterestsOil, Mbbl:
    
    
    589.616
    
    
    
    11.886
    
    
    
    601.502Gas, MMcf:
    
    
    31,310.087
    
    
    
    250.167
    
    
    
    31,560.254Gas Equivalent, MMcfe
(6 Mcf = 1 bbl)
    
    
    34,847.783
    
    
    
    321.483
    
    
    
    35,169.266Cash Flow (BTAX), M$
Undiscounted:
    
    
    89,635.251
    
    
    
    1,200.456
    
    
    
    90,835.707Discounted at 10%
Per Annum:
    
    
    53,467.184
    
    
    
    763.286
    
    
    
    54,230.470




---



##### 



Gas Daily




---



##### 








---



##### 



Standards Pertaining to the Estimating and Auditing of Oil and Gas
Reserves Information
  Very truly yours,
Wright & Company, Inc.By:
    /s/ D. Randall WrightD. Randall WrightPresident
# EUR-Lex - 12002E266 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E266

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Five: Institutions of the Community - Title I: Provisions governing the institutions - Chapter 5: The European Investment Bank - Article 266 - Article 198d - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0139 - 0139 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0286 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0070 - Consolidated version *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Five: Institutions of the Community

Title I: Provisions governing the institutions

Chapter 5: The European Investment Bank

Article 266

Article 198d - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 266

The European Investment Bank shall have legal personality.

The members of the European Investment Bank shall be the Member States.

The Statute of the European Investment Bank is laid down in a Protocol annexed to this Treaty. The Council acting unanimously, at the request of the European Investment Bank and after consulting the European Parliament and the Commission, or at the request of the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament and the European Investment Bank, may amend Articles 4, 11 and 12 and Article 18(5) of the Statute of the Bank.
# EUR-Lex - 11997E282 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11997E282

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Amsterdam consolidated version) - Part Six: General and Final Provisions - Article 282 - Article 211 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - Article 211 - EEC Treaty **

*
Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0293 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0074 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Amsterdam consolidated version)

Article 282

In each of the Member States, the Community shall enjoy the most extensive legal capacity accorded to legal persons under their laws; it may, in particular, acquire or dispose of movable and immovable property and may be a party to legal proceedings. To this end, the Community shall be represented by the Commission.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 21-14298

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JONATHON HOWARD BECK, 

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Alabama

D.C. Docket No. 1:20-cr-00137-CG-B-1

____________________

USCA11 Case: 21-14298 Document: 35-1 Date Filed: 12/05/2022 Page: 1 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 21-14298

Before JORDAN, BRANCH, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

James B. Vollmer, counsel for Jonathon Howard Beck in this 

direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of 

the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to 

withdraw is GRANTED, and Beck’s convictions and sentences are 

AFFIRMED.

USCA11 Case: 21-14298 Document: 35-1 Date Filed: 12/05/2022 Page: 2 of 2
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Registrant. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                |   |                                                                                                                  |   |
|---------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| March      24, 2010 |        | /s/  Robert V.      Cuddihy, Jr.                                                                            |   |
|                |   | Robert      V. Cuddihy, Jr.                                                                                           |   |
|                |   | Chief      Operating Officer andInterim      Chief Financial Officer(Principal      Accounting and Financial Officer) |   |

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 1, 2017

s1031

Order 

Clerk

November 1, 2017

156641 & (4)(5)

GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR,

Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 156641

ADB: 15-000023-GA

LYLE DICKSON,

Respondent-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The motion to stay is considered, and it is DENIED.

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 3.11

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                          TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                            TEJAS POWER CORPORATION


                  Tejas Power Corporation, a corporation organized and existing
under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware,
DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

         FIRST: That a meeting of the Board of Directors of Tejas Power
Corporation resolutions were duly adopted setting forth a proposed amendment to
the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation,
declaring said amendment to be advisable and calling a meeting of the
stockholders of said corporation for consideration thereof. The resolution
setting forth the proposed amendment is as follows:

                           RESOLVED, That the Amended and Restated Certificate
                  of Incorporation of this corporation be amended as follows:

                  The name of the corporation is changed to "TPC Corporation."

         SECOND: That thereafter, pursuant to the resolution of its Board of
Directors, the annual meeting of the stockholders of said corporation was duly
called and held, upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware at which meeting the necessary number
of shares as required by statute were voted in favor of the amendment.

         THIRD:   That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance  with the 
provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of 
Delaware.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Tejas Power Corporation has caused this
certificate to be signed by Marilyn I. Eckersley, its Assistant Secretary, this
6th day of May, 1996.


                                               /s/  Marilyn I. Eckersely       
                                               --------------------------------
                                               Name: Marilyn I. Eckersley
                                               Title:    Assistant Secretary
#### § 15.52 Species included in the prohibited list. [Reserved]
Case 16-26387 Doc 1 Filed 08/17/16 Entered 08/17/16 10:54:43 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 9
Case 16-26387 Doc 1 Filed 08/17/16 Entered 08/17/16 10:54:43 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 9
Case 16-26387 Doc 1 Filed 08/17/16 Entered 08/17/16 10:54:43 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 9
Case 16-26387 Doc 1 Filed 08/17/16 Entered 08/17/16 10:54:43 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 9
Case 16-26387 Doc 1 Filed 08/17/16 Entered 08/17/16 10:54:43 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 9
Case 16-26387 Doc 1 Filed 08/17/16 Entered 08/17/16 10:54:43 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 9
Case 16-26387 Doc 1 Filed 08/17/16 Entered 08/17/16 10:54:43 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 9
Case 16-26387 Doc 1 Filed 08/17/16 Entered 08/17/16 10:54:43 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 9
Case 16-26387 Doc 1 Filed 08/17/16 Entered 08/17/16 10:54:43 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 9
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 Certification Pursuant To
Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 I, Peter K. Lane, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Hollinger International Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants fourth fiscal quarter of the period covered
by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to




---



##### 



adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting. Date: January 18, 2005 /s/ Peter K. LaneName:
    Peter K. LaneTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer
§ 228.20 Recommended decision, certification of the transcript and submission of comments on the recommended decision. ( a ) Promptly after expiration of the period for receiving written briefs, the presiding officer shall make a recommended decision based on the record and transmit the decision to the Assistant Administrator. The recommended decision shall include: ( 1 ) A statement containing a description of the history of the proceedings;
( 2 ) Findings on the issues of fact with the reasons therefor; and
( 3 ) Rulings on issues of law.
( b ) The presiding officer shall also transmit to the Assistant Administrator the transcript of the hearing, the original and all copies of the direct testimony, and written comments. The presiding officer shall attach to the original transcript of the hearing a certificate stating that, to the best of his knowledge and belief, the transcript is a true transcript of the testimony given at the hearing except in such particulars as are specified.
( c ) Immediately after receipt of the recommended decision, the Assistant Administrator shall give notice thereof in the Federal Register, send copies of the recommended decision to all parties, and provide opportunity for the submission of comments. The recommended decision may be reviewed and/or copied in the office of the Assistant Administrator, National Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
( d ) Within 20 days after the notice of receipt of the recommended decision has been published in the Federal Register, any interested person may file with the Assistant Administrator any written comments on the recommended decision. All comments, including recommendations from or consultation with the Marine Mammal Commission, must be submitted during the 20-day period to the Assistant Administrator at the previously mentioned address.
Case 16-27466 Doc 12 Filed 08/30/16 Entered 08/31/16 06:23:49 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
Document

AMENDMENT TO THE CLEARWATER PAPER CORPORATION MANAGEMENT DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
The Clearwater Paper Corporation Management Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated as of January 1, 2016 (the “Plan”), is hereby amended as follows effective as of May 1, 2020: 
Section 5(b) of the Plan is hereby amended to read as follows:
(b) At the time of an Employee’s initial election to defer base salary or an award under the AIP, the Employee shall file an election which shall indicate whether such deferred Compensation shall be paid in a lump sum or paid in annual installments over a period of fifteen (15) or fewer years.  Installment payments under the Plan shall be treated as a single distribution for purposes of Section 409A of the Code.  An Employee who elects to participate in the Plan for Plan Years beginning prior to January 1, 2014 shall have only one form of payment election in effect for all amounts deferred under the Plan in such Plan Years.  For amounts deferred in any Plan Year beginning on or after January 1, 2014 and prior to January 1, 2016, an Employee who elects to participate in the Plan for such Plan Year shall be permitted to make a separate form of payment election for all amounts to be deferred in such Plan Year.  For any Plan Year beginning on or after January 1, 2016, an Employee who elects to participate in the Plan for such Plan Year shall be permitted to make one form of payment election for all base salary to be deferred in such Plan Year and a separate form of payment election for any AIP award to be deferred in such Plan Year.  An Employee’s form of payment elections in effect for any Plan Year shall remain in effect for similar amounts (base salary or AIP awards) deferred in each subsequent Plan Year unless and until the Employee makes a new form of payment election in the manner prescribed by the Committee; provided, however, that for any election to defer an AIP award or base salary submitted on or after May 1, 2020, the Employee shall be required to submit a separate form of payment election for the amount to be deferred (or allow the default form of payment described in the next sentence to apply).  Deferred Compensation shall be distributed in a single lump sum payment unless the Employee elects otherwise.
To record adoption of this Amendment, Clearwater Paper Corporation has caused its authorized officer to execute the same.


Date:  6/25/20  CLEARWATER PAPER CORPORATION








             By:  Kari G. Moyes      Name: Kari G. Moyes      Title: Senior Vice President, Human Resources
2
4834-6202-7196.v2
Exhibit 23.01
 Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-26359) pertaining to the Sonic Corp. Savings and Profit Sharing
Plan, Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-131450) pertaining to the Sonic
Corp. 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-64890) pertaining to the 1991 Sonic Corp. Stock Option Plan, 2001 Sonic
Corp. Stock Option Plan and 2001 Sonic Corp. Directors’ Stock Option Plan, the
Registration Statements (Forms S-8 No. 333-09373, No. 33-40989 and No.
33-78576) pertaining to the 1991 Sonic Corp. Stock Option Plan, the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-40988) pertaining to the 1991 Sonic Corp. Stock
Purchase Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-40987) pertaining to
the 1991 Sonic Corp. Directors’ Stock Option Plan and the Registration Statement
(Form S-3 No. 33-95716) for the registration of 1,420,000 shares of its common
stock, and the related Prospectuses of our reports dated October 28, 2008, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Sonic Corp. and
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Sonic Corp.,
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended August 31,
2008.
 
 
 ERNST
      & YOUNG LLPOklahoma
      City, OklahomaOctober
      28, 2008
Editorial Note on Part 622
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 622 appear at 79 FR 57837, Sept. 26, 2014 and at 81 FR 32253, May 23, 2016.

§ 622.8 Quotas—general. ( a ) *Applicability.* Quotas apply for the fishing year for each species, species group, sector, or sector component unless accountability measures are implemented during the fishing year pursuant to the applicable annual catch limits (ACLs) and accountability measures (AMs) sections within subparts B through U of this part due to a quota overage occurring in the previous year, in which case a reduced quota will be specified through notification in the Federal Register. Annual quota increases are contingent on the total allowable catch for the applicable species not being exceeded in the previous fishing year. If the total allowable catch is exceeded in the previous fishing year, the RA will file a notification with the Office of the Federal Register to maintain the quota for the applicable species, species group, sector, or sector component from the previous fishing year for following fishing years unless NMFS determines based upon the best scientific information available that maintaining the quota from the previous year is unnecessary. Except for the quotas for Gulf and South Atlantic coral, the quotas include species harvested from state waters adjoining the EEZ.
( b ) *Quota closures.* When a quota specified in this part is reached or is projected to be reached, the Assistant Administrator will file a notification to that effect with the Office of the Federal Register. On and after the effective date of such notification, for the remainder of the fishing year, the applicable closure restrictions for such a quota, as specified in this part apply. See the applicable ACLs, annual catch targets (ACTs), and AMs sections in subparts B through U of this part for closure provisions when an applicable ACL or ACT is reached or projected to be reached.
( c ) *Reopening.* When a species, species group, sector, or sector component has been closed based on a projection of the applicable catch limit (ACL, ACT, or quota) specified in this part being reached and subsequent data indicate that the catch limit was not reached, the Assistant Administrator may file a notification with the Office of the Federal Register. Such notification may reopen the species, species group, sector, or sector component to provide an opportunity for the catch limit to be harvested.
[87 FR 56216, Sept. 13, 2022, as amended at 89 FR 40435, May 10, 2024]