alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, Donald Sharpe, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Eden Energy Corp.
      for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Eden Energy Corp..                                                                

Dated: May 15, 2011

| | /s/
      Donald Sharpe      
| | -----------------------------
| | Donald Sharpe                
| | President and Director       
| | (Principal Executive Officer)
| | Eden Energy Corp.            

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Eden Energy
Corp. and will be retained by Eden Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
§ 95.2765 MURS frequency accuracy. Each MURS transmitter type must be designed to meet the applicable frequency tolerance and stability requirements of this section. ( a ) MURS transmitters that operate with an emission bandwidth of 6.25 kHz or less must be designed such that the carrier frequencies remain within ±2.0 parts-per-million (ppm) of the channel center frequencies specified in § 95.2763 during normal operating conditions.
( b ) MURS transmitters that operate with an emission bandwidth greater than 6.25 kHz must be designed such that the carrier frequencies remain within ±5.0 ppm of the channel center frequencies specified in § 95.2763 during normal operating conditions.
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0954NACOLE Case Studies on Civilian Oversight: Police Review and Advisory Board (Cambridge, Massachusetts)The wave of high-profile incidents in 2020 between police and community members prompted widespread calls for greater community oversight of law enforcement agencies. Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement: Report on the State of the Field and Effective Oversight Practices, a white paper by the National Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement, outlines the history of civilian oversight including reference to this case study of the Cambridge Police Department and eight others.By National Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement (NACOLE)Categories: Data and AnalysisLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0954Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Jul 2021Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 01:58 (UTC-5) in 0.22 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
# EUR-Lex - 12002E275 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E275

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Five: Institutions of the Community - Title II: Financial provisions - Article 275 - Article 205a - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0144 - 0144 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0291 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0073 - Consolidated version *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Five: Institutions of the Community

Title II: Financial provisions

Article 275

Article 205a - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 275

The Commission shall submit annually to the Council and to the European Parliament the accounts of the preceding financial year relating to the implementation of the budget. The Commission shall also forward to them a financial statement of the assets and liabilities of the Community.
Editorial Note on Part 300
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 300 appear at 64 FR 44431, Aug. 16, 1999, and at 76 FR 59305, Sept. 26, 2011.

§ 300.173 Vessel identification. Each U.S. vessel fishing under the Treaty must be marked for identification purposes, as follows: ( a ) A vessel used to fish on the high seas within the Convention Area as defined in § 300.211 must be marked in accordance with the requirements at §§ 300.14 and 300.217.
( b ) A vessel not used to fish on the high seas within the Convention Area as defined in § 300.211 must be marked in accordance with either: ( 1 ) Sections 300.14 and 300.217, or
( 2 ) The vessel's name and U.S. Coast Guard Documentation number (or if not documented, the state registration number) followed by the letter U must be prominently displayed where they are clearly visible both from the air and from a surface vessel. Numerals and the letter U must meet the size requirements of § 660.704 of this title. Markings must be legible and of a color that contrasts with the background.
[76 FR 73520, Nov. 29, 2011]
# EUR-Lex - 12004V003 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V003

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART I - TITLE I — DEFINITION AND OBJECTIVES OF THE UNION - Article I-3 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0011 - 0012 *

Article I-3

The Union's objectives

1. The Union's aim is to promote peace, its values and the well-being of its peoples.

2. The Union shall offer its citizens an area of freedom, security and justice without internal frontiers, and an internal market where competition is free and undistorted.

3. The Union shall work for the sustainable development of Europe based on balanced economic growth and price stability, a highly competitive social market economy, aiming at full employment and social progress, and a high level of protection and improvement of the quality of the environment. It shall promote scientific and technological advance.

It shall combat social exclusion and discrimination, and shall promote social justice and protection, equality between women and men, solidarity between generations and protection of the rights of the child.

It shall promote economic, social and territorial cohesion, and solidarity among Member States.

It shall respect its rich cultural and linguistic diversity, and shall ensure that Europe's cultural heritage is safeguarded and enhanced.

4. In its relations with the wider world, the Union shall uphold and promote its values and interests. It shall contribute to peace, security, the sustainable development of the Earth, solidarity and mutual respect among peoples, free and fair trade, eradication of poverty and the protection of human rights, in particular the rights of the child, as well as to the strict observance and the development of international law, including respect for the principles of the United Nations Charter.

5. The Union shall pursue its objectives by appropriate means commensurate with the competences which are conferred upon it in the Constitution.

--------------------------------------------------
N. Y. SUPERIOR COURT.

#### Jean Toulandou agt. Augustus Lachenmeyer.

The *statute of limitations*of another state, in which the cause of action arises, is not available as a defense in this state. If six years have not elapsed since the statute of this state began to run the right of action is not barred.

If the statute of limitations was admissible as evidence of a defense here, it could not be proved *bygarni.*

*General Term, January,*1869.

Action for money lent and advanced, and goods sold and delivered in the city of New Orleans, state of Louisiana, during the years 1858, 1859 and 1861.

Defense, statute of limitations of the state of Louisiana.

On the trial, a witness'for the defendant testified that he was a practicing lawyer in New Orleans, and acquainted with the laws of Louisiana. He was then asked the following question: “ What is the law of Louisiana with regard to prescription or limitation of actions for goods sold and delivered and money loaned ?

The question was objected to, and excluded by the court, and the defendant excepted.

The plaintiff had a verdict, and the defendant appealed, and also from an order made at special term denying a motion for a new trial.

Lauterbach & Spingarn, *for appellant, defendant.*

H. Morrison, *for respondent, plaintiff.*

*By the court,*Monell, J.

The statute of the state of Louisiana, in which state the cause of action in this case arose, limiting the time for bringing actions, is not available as a defense, in the courts of this state *(Ruggles*agt. *Keeler,*3 *John. R.,*263). It is therefore immaterial, that by the laws *146of that state, the right of action would be. lost. If six years have not elapsed since the statute of our own state began to run, the right of action is not barred.

The evidence offered of the Louisiana statute was therefore properly excluded.

The manner of proving such statute was also objectionable. The defense was the *u statute*of limitations ” and, although the question which was overruled admitted of an swer, proving the existence in that state of some common law bar, recognized by the courts of that state, yet, under-the answer, the *statute*was the only bar which could properly be proved; and the attempt was to prove such statute *by parol.*That probably could not be done. Until a recent period, such laws could be proved in our courts *only*by a copy properly exemplified by the officer having the custody of them—at least such seems to be the current authority *(Packard*agt. *Hill, 2 Wend.,*411; *Thomas*agt. *Robinson, 3 id., 267).*

In 1848, a statute was passed in this state, allowing the printed volumes of the statute laws of any other of the United States, to be admitted in our courts as *prima facie*evidence of such laws *(Sess. Laws,*1848, *chap.,*312).

The question was therefore properly overruled, and judgment should be affirmed.

Jones and Fithian, JJ., concurred.
Docket No. FAA-2013-0332
§ 25.11 Purpose of regulations. ( a ) The regulations in this subchapter govern general administration of units of the National Wildlife Refuge System, public notice of changes in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service policy regarding Refuge System units, issuance of permits required on Refuge System units and other administrative aspects involving the management of various units of the National Wildlife Refuge System. The regulations in this subchapter apply to areas of land and water held by the United States in fee title and to property interests in such land and water in less than fee, including but not limited to easements. For areas held in less than fee, the regulations in this subchapter apply only to the extent that the property interest held by the United States may be affected. The regulations in this subchapter also apply to and govern those areas of the Rocky Mountain Arsenal over which management responsibility has been transferred to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service under the Rocky Mountain Arsenal Act of 1992 (Pub. L. 102-402, 106 Stat. 1961), before their establishment as a refuge and inclusion in the National Wildlife Refuge System.
( b ) All national wildlife refuges are maintained for the primary purpose of developing a national program of wildlife and ecological conservation and rehabilitation. These refuges are established for the restoration, preservation, development and management of wildlife and wildlands habitat; for the protection and preservation of endangered or threatened species and their habitat; and for the management of wildlife and wildlands to obtain the maximum benefits from these resources.
[41 FR 9166, Mar. 3, 1976, as amended at 51 FR 7574, Mar. 5, 1986; 62 FR 47375, Sept. 9, 1997]
§ 23.43 What are the requirements for a wildlife hybrid? ( a ) *Definition.* For the purposes of this section, recent lineage means the last four generations of a specimen's ancestry (direct line of descent).
( b ) *U.S. and foreign general provisions.* Except as provided in paragraph (f) of this section, the import, export, or re-export of a hybrid CITES wildlife specimen must be accompanied by a valid CITES document.
( c ) *CITES documents.* All CITES documents must show the wildlife hybrid listed in the following Appendix: If at least one specimen in the recent lineage is listed in:
Then the specimen islisted in: (1) Appendix I
Appendix I (2) Appendix II, and an Appendix-I species is not included in the recent lineage
Appendix II (3) Appendix III, and an Appendix-I or -II species is not included in the recent lineage
Appendix III
( d ) *U.S. application for wildlife hybrid.* To apply for a CITES document, complete the appropriate form for the proposed activity (see §§ 23.18 through 23.20) and submit it to the U.S. Management Authority.
( e ) *Criteria.* For export of a hybrid that contains a CITES species in its recent lineage, you must meet the requirements of § 23.36.
( f ) *Exempt wildlife hybrids.* The following provisions apply to import, export, or re-export of exempt wildlife hybrids: ( 1 ) A hybrid between a CITES species and a non-CITES species may be exempt from CITES document requirements if there are no purebred CITES species in the previous four generations of the specimen's ancestry (direct line of descent). Under this section, a hybrid between two CITES species is not exempt.
( 2 ) For import, export, or re-export of an exempt wildlife hybrid without CITES documents, you must provide information at the time of import or export to clearly demonstrate that your specimen has no purebred CITES specimens in the previous four generations of its ancestry. If you are unable to clearly demonstrate this, you must obtain CITES documents. The information you provide must clearly identify the specimen and demonstrate its recent lineage. Such information may include, but is not limited to, the following: ( i ) Records that identify the name and address of the breeder and identify the specimen by birth or hatch date and by sex, band number, microchip number, or other mark.
( ii ) A certified pedigree issued by an internationally recognized association that contains scientific names of the animals in the specimen's recent lineage and clearly illustrates its genetic history. If the pedigree contains codes, you must provide a key or guide that explains the meaning of the codes.
( 3 ) Although a CITES document is not required for an exempt wildlife hybrid, you must follow the clearance requirements for wildlife in part 14 of this subchapter, including the prior notification requirements for live wildlife.
[72 FR 48448, Aug. 23, 2007, as amended at 79 FR 30425, May 27, 2014]
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: June 24, 2014 TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR

–2013
- 0602 FROM: EPA Region 1 SUBJECT: June 23, 2014 , Conference Call with RGGI State Staff Regarding Proposed

Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants
**SUMMARY** A meeting was held between EPA and the attendees listed below from the states that participate in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI). The discussion focused on the conversion of a rate

- based goal to a mass

- based goal. **ATTENDEES (all by phone)**  **New York:** Lo is New (NY DEC) , Jared Snyder (NY DEC) , Jon Binder (NY DEC) **Massachusetts:** Nancy

Seidman (MA DEP), Christine Kirby (MA DEP), Will Space (MA DEP), Bill Lamkin (MA DEP) **Connecticut:** Wendy

Jacobs (CT DEEP), Tracy Babbidge (CT DEEP) **Rhode Island:** Frank Stevenson (RI DEM), Dena Gonsalves (RI DEM), Doug McVay (RI DEM) **Vermont:** Brian Woods (VT ANR), Mary Jo Krolewski (VT PSB), Kevin Fink (VT PSB) **Delaware:** Valerie Gray

(DNREC) and Morgan Ellis (Delaware Energy Office) **Maryland:** Diane Franks (MDE), Luke Wisnewski (MDE), Kath y Kinsey (MDE), Marissa Paslick (Maryland PSC) **New Hampshire:** Craig Wright (NH DES), Joe Fontaine (NH DES) **Maine:** Erle Townsend (ME DEP), Marc Cone (ME DEP), Jamie Farrin (ME DEP) **NESCAUM:** Paul Miller, L eah We iss, Alison Guerette **RGGI:** Nicole Singh **EPA Region 1 Staff:** Shutsu Wong, Cy nthia Greene, Dave Conro y, Bob McConnell **EPA Region 2 Staff:** Rick Ruvo, Karl Mangels, Kirk Wieber, Gavin Lau, Anthony Gardella, Bob Kell y, Irene Nielsen **EPA Region 3:** Mike Gordon, Amy Johansen, Emily

L inn **EPA HQ:** Kevin Culligan, Reid Harvey , Chris Sherry , Ryan Sims, Brian Fisher, Jeb Stenhouse, Rick Haeuber, Jenny

Noonan Attachments: E

- mail with questions.
# EUR-Lex - 12002E153 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E153

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Three: Community policies - Title XIV: Consumer protection - Article 153 - Article 129a - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0101 - 0101 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0247 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0048 - Consolidated version *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Three: Community policies

Title XIV: Consumer protection

Article 153

Article 129a - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 153

1. In order to promote the interests of consumers and to ensure a high level of consumer protection, the Community shall contribute to protecting the health, safety and economic interests of consumers, as well as to promoting their right to information, education and to organise themselves in order to safeguard their interests.

2. Consumer protection requirements shall be taken into account in defining and implementing other Community policies and activities.

3. The Community shall contribute to the attainment of the objectives referred to in paragraph 1 through:

(a) measures adopted pursuant to Article 95 in the context of the completion of the internal market;

(b) measures which support, supplement and monitor the policy pursued by the Member States.

4. The Council, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 and after consulting the Economic and Social Committee, shall adopt the measures referred to in paragraph 3(b).

5. Measures adopted pursuant to paragraph 4 shall not prevent any Member State from maintaining or introducing more stringent protective measures. Such measures must be compatible with this Treaty. The Commission shall be notified of them.
#### § 216.2 Scope of regulations.

This part 216 applies solely to marine mammals and marine mammal products as defined in § 216.3. For regulations under the MMPA, with respect to other marine mammals and marine mammal products, see 50 CFR part 18.

[39 FR 1852, Jan. 15, 1974, as amended at 59 FR 50375, Oct. 3, 1994]
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Appellate case name: In the Interest of R. J., A Child

Appellate case number: 01-18-00729-CV

Trial court case number: CV29910

Trial court: 344th District Court of Chambers County

This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment in a suit in which the termination of 

the parent-child relationship is at issue (“parental termination case”) for both the father, R. 

J., Sr., and the mother, E. M. On October 1, 2018, appellant R. J., Sr.’s counsel, William 

B. Connolly, filed his appellant’s brief. This Court’s October 5, 2018 Order directed 

appellant R.J., Sr.’s counsel to file an amended brief, which he did on October 9, 2018. To 

date, appellant E.M. has yet to file a brief. On the date that it was due, October 22, 2018, 

appellee, Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, filed an extension of time 

to file its brief until November 12, 2018.

Appeals in parental termination cases are to be brought to final disposition within 

180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed, so far as reasonably possible. See TEX.

ST. JUD. ADMIN. R. 6.2(a) (West 2017). Here, the first notice of appeal was timely filed

on August 10, 2018, in the trial court from the August 6, 2018 final decree for termination 

by appointed counsel for the mother, E. M., setting the 180-day compliance deadline for 

February 6, 2019. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(b). Although appellee’s motion is unopposed, 

the accelerated schedule in termination cases requires greater compliance with briefing 

deadlines and greater scrutiny of extensions. Appellee’s counsel contends that an extension 

is needed because he filed briefs in two other cases and the records in this case are 

voluminous, entailing three volumes of the clerk’s record, two volumes of the supplemental 

clerk’s record, and five volumes of the reporter’s record.

Accordingly, appellee’s motion for an extension of time to file appellee’s brief is 

GRANTED until November 12, 2018, but no further extensions will be granted absent 

extraordinary circumstances. See TEX. R. APP. P. 4.1(a), 38.6(d).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

 ☒ Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: October 23, 2018
Case 16-23443 Doc 4 Filed 07/21/16 Entered 07/21/16 15:06:58 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-23443 Doc 4 Filed 07/21/16 Entered 07/21/16 15:06:58 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Watts Premier, Inc., Watts Regulator Co.,

and Watts Water Technologies, Inc.

,

Appellant s

,

v.

Texas Farmers Insurance Company as

Subrogee of Francisco Mercado

,

Appellee

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 6

- 00 232

- C V

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 3

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 2016 D CV0690 )

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is the Second Joint Motion to Continue Abatement. The

motion is GRANTED. We therefore extend the abatement until June 24 , 2017. The parties shall

file their motion to dismiss the appeal or their motion for continuation of abatemen t on or before

June 24 , 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 2 5 th day of April , 20 1 7

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.