alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gregg A. Waldon, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary
and Treasurer of Stellent, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation (the "Company"),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:


     (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended by Amendment No. 2, of the
Company for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies
with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


     (3) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                                  /s/ GREGG A. WALDON
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                     Gregg A. Waldon
                                             Executive Vice President, Chief
                                                    Financial Officer,
                                                 Secretary and Treasurer


Dated: April 28, 2004
Editorial Note on Part 622
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 622 appear at 79 FR 57837, Sept. 26, 2014 and at 81 FR 32253, May 23, 2016.

§ 622.487 Adjustment of management measures. In accordance with the framework procedure of the Fishery Management Plan for the EEZ around St Croix, the RA may establish or modify the following items. ( a ) *Standard open framework procedures.* Re-specify maximum sustainable yield (MSY), optimum yield (OY), overfishing limit (OFL), maximum fishing mortality threshold (MFMT), minimum stock size threshold (MSST), acceptable biological catch (ABC), ACL, ACT, sustainable yield level, and other related management reference points and status determination criteria; establish or revise rebuilding plans; revise AMs; modify reporting or monitoring requirements, and time or area closures and closure procedures.
( b ) *Abbreviated open framework procedures.* Gear or vessel marking requirements, maintaining fish in a specific condition, size limits, commercial trip limits, recreational bag and possession limits, changes to the length of an established closed season of no more than 1 day, and gear modifications to address conservation issues including responding to interactions with species listed under the Endangered Species Act or protected under the Marine Mammal Protection Act.
Editorial Note on Part 300
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 300 appear at 64 FR 44431, Aug. 16, 1999, and at 76 FR 59305, Sept. 26, 2011.

§ 300.29 Observers. The following requirements apply to all on-board fisheries observers required under this subpart, which includes observers on purse seine, longline vessels, and transshipment carrier vessels, and while on a fishing trip in the IATTC Convention Area. ( a ) *Contact information.* A full list of U.S. longline and IATTC purse seine observer providers and U.S. Government contacts for situations described in paragraphs (b) through (d) of this section is available at the following website: *https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/west-coast/partners/emergency-contacts-vessel-owners-operators-and-observers-longline-and-purse .*
( b ) *Loss of life.* In the event that an observer dies, is missing, or presumed fallen overboard, the owner or operator of the fishing vessel must immediately notify a U.S. Government contact and the observer provider.
( c ) *Serious illness or injury.* The owner or operator of a fishing vessel of the United States shall immediately report serious illness or injury that threatens the life and/or long-term health or safety of an observer to the observer provider and a U.S. Government contact. In addition, the owner or operator of the fishing vessel must: ( 1 ) Immediately cease fishing operations;
( 2 ) Take all reasonable actions to care for the observer and provide any medical treatment available and possible on board the vessel, and where appropriate seek external medical advice;
( 3 ) Where directed by the observer provider, if not already directed by the appropriate U.S. Government contact, facilitate the disembarkation and transport of the observer to a medical facility equipped to provide the required care, as soon as practicable; and
( 4 ) Cooperate fully in any official investigations into the cause of the illness or injury.
( d ) *Assault, intimidation, threat, or harassment.* For reporting violations in the event that an observer on a fishing vessel of the United States has been assaulted, intimidated, threatened, or harassed, the owner or operator of the fishing vessel shall immediately notify the observer provider and the NOAA Office of Law Enforcement West Coast Division Duty Officer line at (206) 526-4851 of the situation and the status and location of the observer. In addition, the owner or operator of the fishing vessel must: ( 1 ) Immediately take action to preserve the safety of the observer and mitigate and resolve the situation on board;
( 2 ) If the observer or the observer provider indicate that they wish for the observer to be removed from the vessel, facilitate the safe disembarkation of the observer in a manner and place, as agreed by the observer provider and a U.S. Government contact, that facilitates access to any needed medical treatment; and
( 3 ) Cooperate fully in any official investigations into the incident.
[85 FR 29669, May 18, 2020]
§ 90.361 Interference from part 15 and Amateur operations. Operations authorized under parts 15 and 97 of this chapter may not cause harmful interference to LMS systems in the 902-928 MHz band. These operations will not be considered to be causing harmful interference to a multilateration LMS system operating in one of the three EA sub-bands (see § 90.357(a)) if they are non-video links operating in accordance with the provisions of parts 15 or 97 of this chapter and at least one of the following conditions are met: ( a ) It is a field disturbance sensor operating under § 15.245 of this chapter and it is not operating in the 904-909.750 or 919.750-928.000 MHz sub-bands; or
( b ) It does not employ an outdoor antenna; or
( c ) If it does employ an outdoor antenna, then if: ( 1 ) The directional gain of the antenna does not exceed 6 dBi, or if the directional gain of the antenna exceeds 6 dBi, it reduces its transmitter output power below 1 watt by the proportional amount that the directional gain of the antenna exceeds 6 dBi; and
( 2 ) Either: ( i ) The antenna is 5 meters or less in height above ground; or
( ii ) The antenna is more than 5 meters in height above ground but less than or equal to 15 meters in height above ground and either: ( A ) Adjusts its transmitter output power below 1 watt by 20 log (h/5) dB, where h is the height above ground of the antenna in meters; or
( B ) Is providing the final link for communications of entities eligible under subpart B or C of this part, or is providing the final link for communications of health care providers that serve rural areas, elementary schools, secondary schools or libraries.
[60 FR 15253, Mar. 23, 1995, as amended at 62 FR 52044, Oct. 6, 1997]
Case 16-81817 Doc 1 Filed 07/29/16 Entered 07/29/16 13:35:29 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 10
Case 16-81817 Doc 1 Filed 07/29/16 Entered 07/29/16 13:35:29 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 10
Case 16-81817 Doc 1 Filed 07/29/16 Entered 07/29/16 13:35:29 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 10
Case 16-81817 Doc 1 Filed 07/29/16 Entered 07/29/16 13:35:29 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 10
Case 16-81817 Doc 1 Filed 07/29/16 Entered 07/29/16 13:35:29 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 10
Case 16-81817 Doc 1 Filed 07/29/16 Entered 07/29/16 13:35:29 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 10
Case 16-81817 Doc 1 Filed 07/29/16 Entered 07/29/16 13:35:29 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 10
Case 16-81817 Doc 1 Filed 07/29/16 Entered 07/29/16 13:35:29 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 10
Case 16-81817 Doc 1 Filed 07/29/16 Entered 07/29/16 13:35:29 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 10
Case 16-81817 Doc 1 Filed 07/29/16 Entered 07/29/16 13:35:29 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 10
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James Haworth, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 on Form 10-K/A of Lighting Science Group Corporation; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







|                  |  |  |  |        |  |                                                  
|----------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 3, 2012 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ James Haworth                                
|                  |  |  |  | Name:  |  | James Haworth                                    
|                  |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
|                  |  |  |  |        |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
Editorial Note on Part 622
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 622 appear at 79 FR 57837, Sept. 26, 2014 and at 81 FR 32253, May 23, 2016.

§ 622.509 Gear identification. ( a ) *Reef fish* — ( 1 ) *Fish traps and associated buoys.* All fish traps used or possessed in the EEZ around St. Thomas and St. John must display the official number specified for the vessel by Puerto Rico or the U.S. Virgin Islands. A fish trap that is fished individually, rather than tied together in a trap line, must have at least one buoy attached that floats on the surface. Fish traps that are tied together in a trap line must have at least one buoy that floats at the surface attached at each end of the trap line. All buoys must display the official number and color code assigned to the vessel by Puerto Rico or the U.S. Virgin Islands, whichever is applicable.
( 2 ) *Presumption of ownership of fish traps.* A fish trap in the EEZ around St. Thomas and St. John will be presumed to be the property of the most recently documented owner. This presumption will not apply with respect to such traps that are lost or sold if the owner reports the loss or sale within 15 days to the RA.
( 3 ) *Disposition of unmarked fish traps or buoys.* An unmarked fish trap or buoy deployed in the EEZ around St. Thomas and St. John is illegal and may be disposed of in any appropriate manner by the Assistant Administrator or an authorized officer.
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) *Spiny lobster* — ( 1 ) *Spiny lobster traps and associated buoys.* All spiny lobster traps used or possessed in the EEZ around St. Thomas and St. John must display the official number specified for the vessel by Puerto Rico or the U.S. Virgin Islands. A spiny lobster trap that is fished individually, rather than tied together in a trap line, must have at least one buoy attached that floats on the surface. Spiny lobster traps that are tied together in a trap line must have at least one buoy that floats at the surface attached at each end of the trap line. All buoys must display the official number and color code assigned to the vessel by Puerto Rico or the U.S. Virgin Islands, whichever is applicable.
( 2 ) *Presumption of ownership of spiny lobster traps.* A spiny lobster trap in the EEZ around St. Thomas and St. John will be presumed to be the property of the most recently documented owner. This presumption will not apply with respect to such traps that are lost or sold if the owner reports the loss or sale within 15 days to the RA.
( 3 ) *Disposition of unmarked spiny lobster traps or buoys.* An unmarked spiny lobster trap or buoy deployed in the EEZ around St. Thomas and St. John is illegal and may be disposed of in any appropriate manner by the Assistant Administrator or an authorized officer.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The certification set forth below is being submitted in
connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of Mercury Interactive Corporation (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.



I, Amnon
Landan, Chief Executive Officer of Mercury Interactive, certify that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Mercury Interactive Corporation.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|Date: March 14, 2005   
|                       
|/s/ Amnon Landan       
|Amnon Landan           
|Chief Executive Officer
Case 16-25993 Doc 9 Filed 08/18/16 Entered 08/18/16 15:06:21 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P338Waking in Oak Creek: A Guide for Community ScreeningsThis guide is designed to help community groups facilitate discussions and training sessions in conjunction with screenings of the 35-minute Not In Our Town film Waking in Oak Creek. Produced in collaboration with the COPS Office, the film profiles a suburban community and local law enforcement attempting to heal after their town is rocked by deadly hate crime shootings at a Sikh temple in Wisconsin, killing six Sikh worshippers. In the following year, community leaders, family members, and police - including an officer shot 15 times by the assailant - join forces to address underlying issues of hate and intolerance. This guide provides discussion questions for use in community screenings. Used together, the film and guide can help agencies and communities work to prevent hate crimes, improve law enforcement-community relations, improve hate crime reporting, enhance investigations and prosecutions, and support victims.Categories: Community PartnershipsLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p338Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFBook • Aug 2015Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 05:59 (UTC-5) in 0.19 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
###### Editorial Note on Part 300

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 300 appear at 64 FR 44431, Aug. 16, 1999, and at 76 FR 59305, Sept. 26, 2011.

#### § 300.116 Penalties.

Any person or harvesting vessel found to be in violation of the Act, this subpart, or any permit issued under this subpart will be subject to the civil and criminal penalty provisions and forfeiture provisions prescribed in the Act, 15 CFR part 904, and other applicable laws.
###### Editorial Note on Part 300

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 300 appear at 64 FR 44431, Aug. 16, 1999, and at 76 FR 59305, Sept. 26, 2011.

#### § 300.30 Purpose and scope.

This subpart implements the South Pacific Tuna Act of 1988 (Act) and the Treaty on Fisheries Between the Governments of Certain Pacific Island States and the Government of the United States of America (Treaty) and applies to persons and vessels subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.
#### CHARLES DISHNO, Respondent, *v.*OWEN REYNOLDS, Appellant.

*Admissibility, on an issue as to a •payment having been made, of evidence tending to show that the party had money from which the payment might have been made.*

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon the verdict of a jury, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial made upon the minutes of the justice before whom the action was tried.

The action was brought to recover $700'and interest, alleged to have been paid in excess of the amount due to the defendant on a bond and mortgage given to him by plaintiff.

The court at General Term said : “ The first exception to which our attention is called is the evidence of Fuller, showing that in October or November, 1871, he paid the plaintiff $2,200 in currency in packages. The bond and mortgage was given by plaintiff in February, 1872, and this evidence was offered to show that plaintiff had the money with which the payment by him to defendant might have been made. Undoubtedly such evidence.is not very cogent, but it is a fact which, in the judgment of jurors, may aid them in arriving at the probable truth. In all cases the jury have the right to know the antecedents of the parties, their position and conduct, and not unfrequently the knowledge of such circumstances, though slight in themselves, may resolve all doubt. Such evidence has been often admitted. At a late term of this court it was held in *Bacon*v. *Frisbie,*that evidence of the value of a farm might be given to affect the probabilities of making the contract claimed to exist in that case. In *Burleiuv, Hubbell*(1 N. Y. S. C. [1T. & C.], 285) evidence of a similar character was admitted, not because it bore directly upon the issue, but because it tended to rebut a presumption arising from other evidence in the case. Similar instances may be found in *Pomeroy*v. *Pierce*(5 Hun, 119; *Bead*v. *Smith,*1 id., 263; *Thorn*v. Hilmer, 4 Abb. Ct. of App. Cases, 408.) The solvency of a party was proved in *Moore*v. *Meacham*(10 N. Y., 207, 211), in support of a claim that a purchase was made on his account. It was held no error. *138See, also, *Harris*v. *Wade*(61 N. Y., 630), as to insolvency of a person not a party, the object being to show that the contract was not made with him. The following cases are also cited by plaintiff’s counsel, but 1 have not the means of verifying them. *(Gamier*v. Renner, 51 Ind., 372; *Strong*v. *Slicer,*35 Verm., 40; *Baker*v. *Stone,*36 Mo., 301.) Evidence in criminal cases is admitted to show that the prisoner had the means of committing the crime. *(People*v. *Lamed,*7 N. Y., 445; *People*v. *Myers,*2 Hun, 6.)”

*Robert S. Hále, for*the appellant. *Waldo & Grover,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Boardman, J.;

Learned, P, J., and Bocees, J., concurred.

Judgment affirmed with costs.
#### JOHN ANDREWS, Respondent, *v.*MORRIS KEELER, Appellant.

*A note, after the matwritij thereof, rums at the rate of interest specified therein until it is merged in a judgment thereon.*

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon the report of a referee. One of the causes of action stated in the complaint was on a promissory note made by the defendant.

With reference to this, the court at General Term said: “ Another item of the plaintiff’s claim was a promissory note made by the defendant, dated April 17, 1867, for $775.10, payable ten days after date, with interest at six per cent. The referee, after deducting all payments proved, allowed the plaintiff interest on the balance, at the rate of seven per cent, from the time of the maturity of the note. In this, we think he erred, the true rule being that the interest is to be computed at six per cent according to' the rate prescribed by the contract, until it ceases to operate by being merged in the judgment. *(Miller*v. *Burroughs,*4 Johns. Ch., 436; *Van Beuren*v. *Van GaasbecJc,*4 Cow., 496; *Gromwell*v. *County of Sac.,*96 U. S. Sup. Ct., 51; *S. C.,*17 Alb. L. J., 264.) ”

*S. Bdwin*Day, for the appellant.

*TV. B. Hughett,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Smith, J.;

Talcott, P. J., and Hakdin, J., concurred.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered before another referee, costs to" abide event, unless the plaintiff will stipulate that the *88judgment be modified by striking out the sums allowed by the referee upon the two instruments dated January 7, 1869, and also by computing interest on the promissory note of April 17, 1867, at six per cent instead of seven per cent, and reducing the recovery thereon accordingly, and that in such case the judgment, as so modified, shall be affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party as against the other.
# EUR-Lex - 11992E209 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11992E209

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY - PART FIVE : INSTITUTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY - TITLE II : FINANCIAL PROVISIONS - ARTICLE 209 /* CODIFIED VERSION OF THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY */ **

*
Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0074 *

Article 209

The Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament and obtaining the opinion of the Court of Auditors, shall:

(a) make Financial Regulations specifying in particular the procedure to be adopted for establishing and implementing the budget and for presenting and auditing accounts;

(b) determine the methods and procedure whereby the budget revenue provided under the arrangements relating to the Community's own resources shall be made available to the Commission, and determine the measures to be applied, if need be, to meet cash requirements;

(c) lay down rules concerning the responsibility of financial controllers, authorizing officers and accounting officers, and concerning appropriate arrangements for inspection.
- Untitled.pdf
- Untitled (002).pdf
- Untitled (005).pdf