alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

 

I,Gerard E. Holthaus, Chief Executive Officer, certify, that:

 

(1)         I havereviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Williams Scotsman, Inc.;

 

(2)         Based on myknowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

(3)         Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this annual report;

 

(4)         Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under  mysupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

b)             Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

 

(5)         Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a)              Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)             Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| */s/ Gerard E. Holthaus*  | * * |
|---------------------------|----------|
| *Gerard E. Holthaus*      |
| *Chief Executive Officer* |
| * *                  |
| March 30, 2005       |

 

 

----
DD FORM 2564, AUG 1998 lEG) PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETE. Designed using Perform Pro. WHS/DIOR. Jul 98

ANNUAL REPORT

REPORT CONTROL SYMBOL

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT DD-DA&M(A)1365

1. INITIALREQUEST DETERMINATIONS

a. TOTALREQUESTS b. GRANTEDINFULL c. DENIEDINPART d. DENIEDINFULL e. "OTHERREASONS" f. TOTALACTIONS

54 40 0 1 13 54

2a. EXEMPTIONS INVOKEDON INITIALREQUEST DETERMINATIONS

(bl (11 (bl (21 (bl (3) (b) (41 (bl (5) (b) (61

0 1 0 0 0 0

(bl (7)(A) (b) (7)(BI (bl (7)(CI (bl (7)(D) (b) (7)(EI (bl (7)(F) (b) (8) (bl (9)

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2b. "OTHER REASONS" CITED ON INITIALDETERMINATIONS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 TOTAL

2 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 13

2c. STATUTES CITED ON INITIALREQUEST (b)(3) EXEMPTIONS

(1)(b)(31 STATUTE CLAIMED

NUMBER OF COURT UPHELD? CONCISE DESCRIPTION

INSTANCES (Yes or No) OF MATERIALWITHHELD

N/A 0 N/A N/A

3. APPEAL DETERMINATIONS

a. TOTALREQUESTS b. GRANTEDINFULL c. DENIEDINPART d. DENIEDIN FULL e. "OTHERREASONS" f. TOTALACTIONS

0 0 0 0 0 0
o o o o

4c. STATUTES CITED ON APPEAL (b)(3) EXEMPTIONS

(1)(b)(3) STATUTE CLAIMED NUMBER OF

INSTANCES

o

COURT UPHELD?

(Yes orNo)

N/A I N/A

CONCISE DESCRIPTION

OF MATERIAL WITHHELD

N/A

5. NUMBER AND MEDIAN AGE OF INITIAL CASES PENDING (1) AS OF BEGINNING REPORT PERIOD (2) AS OF END REPORT PERIOD

a. TOTAL INITIAL REQUESTS PENDING (open) o 2

b. MEDIAN AGE (in days) OF OPEN INITIAL REQUESTS o 20

6. TOTAL NUMBER OF INITIAL REQUESTS RECEIVED DURING THE FISCAL YEAR

7. TYPES OF INITIAL REQUESTS PROCESSED AND MEDIAN AGE

Appt'4ls Red: cp

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES

56

MEDIAN AGE (Days)

a. SIMPLE 54 20

b. COMPLEX o o

c. EXPEDITEDPROCESSING o o

8. TOTAL AMOUNT COLLECTED FROM THE PUBLIC $ 1,485

9. PROGRAM COST

a. NUMBER OF FULL TIME STAFF 0.00

c. DUTY TITLE

Director, Resource Management

e. TELEPHONE NUMBER(Include Area Code)

b. NUMBER OF PART TIME STAFF 0.30

c. ESTIMATED LITIGATION COST $ 0.00

d. TOTAL PROGRAM COST $ 47,302.00 Defense Technical Information Center 703-767-9236

DD FORM 2564 (BACK), AUG 1998

4a. EXEMPTIONS INVOKED ON APPEAL DETERMINATIONS

(b) (1) (b) (2) (b) (3) (b) (4) (b) (5) (b) (6)

0 0 0 0 0 0

(b) (7)(A) (b) (7)(B) (b) (7)(C) (b) (7)(D) (b) (7)(E) (b) (7)(F) (b) (8) (b) (9)

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4b. "OTHER REASONS" CITED ON APPEAL DETERMINATIONS

1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 6 7 8 9 TOTAL

0 0 0 0 0 0
###### Editorial Note on Part 660

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 660 appear at 67 FR 65906, Oct. 29, 2002, 88 FR 81358, Nov. 22, 2023.

#### § 660.701 Purpose and scope.

This subpart implements the Fishery Management Plan for U.S. West Coast Fisheries for Highly Migratory Species (FMP). These regulations govern commercial and recreational fishing for HMS in the U.S. EEZ off the coasts of Washington, Oregon, and California and in adjacent high seas waters.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-11097

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LUIS LAURO LUNA-ARRIAGA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:10-CR-72-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, CLEMENT, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Luis Lauro LunaArriaga (Luna) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v.

Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Luna has not filed a response. We have

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. 

We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 16, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-11097 Document: 00511573762 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/16/2011
No. 10-11097

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 10-11097 Document: 00511573762 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/16/2011
### ,j^^ ^ 

### bor - oiT ' i^ U 

### - 

### iT- i t 

# m a STAT E O F MICHIGA N JENNIFE R M.GRANHOL M DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATIO N KIR KT . STEUDL E

GOVERNO Rj^^j^^j^ ^ DIRECTO R Jul y 15,201 0 Mr . Denni s DeVan

y Chief , Essentia l Ai r Servic e Division , X-5 3 Office o f Aviatio n Analysi s U.S . Departmen

t o f Transportatio n Roo m640 1 400 Sevent

h Street , S W Washington , D.C . 2059 0 Reference : USDOT Orde

r 2010-6- 4 Dea r Mr . DeVany : A s th e agency responsibl e fo r promoting ai

r servic e developmen

t i n th e state , th e Michiga

n Departmen

t o f Transportation - Burea

u o f Aeronautic s and Freigh

t Service s appreciate s th e opportunit y to provide inpu

t o n th e Essentia

l Ai r Servic e (EAS ) selectio n fo r Gogebic-Iro n Count y an d Maniste e County-Blacke

r Airports . While encourage d b

y th e interes t

o f bot h Charte r Ai r Transpor t an d Sovereign Ai

r in serving thes e airports , we suppor

t the selectio n o f

Charte r Ai r Transpor t a s we believ e their

proposa l offer s th e highes t

possibilit y o f long-ter msuccess . W

e ar e concerne d abou

t wha t appear s t o b e a numbe r o f certificatio n an

d operationa

l milestone s tha

t hav e ye t to b e achieve d b

y Sovereign Air . Thes e certificatio n issues , coupled wit h aproposa

l tha t seem s to lac

k certaint y wit h regar d to fleet selection , leav e u s concerne d tha t Sovereign Ai

r ma y not b e in apositio n t o mee

t th e obligation s require d fo

r successfu l servic e t o thes e tw o airports . Onc e again , than

k yo u fo r th e opportunit

y t o participat

e i n th e carrie

r selectio n process . I

f yo u nee d an y fiuthe r information , pleas e contac t m e a t 517-335-9918 . Sincerely , Matthew V . Brinke

r Ai r Servic e Specialis t Burea u o f Aeronautic s & Freigh

t Service s Michiga n Departmen

t o f Transportatio n cc : Mr . Duane DuRay , Manager , Gogebic-Iro n Count y Airpor t Mr . Barr y Lind , Manager , Maniste e County-Blacke r Airpor t

AERONAUTIC S BUILDIN G • 270 0 E . AIRPORT SERVIC E DR . • LANSING , MICHIGA N 4890 6 www.michigan.gov• (517 ) 335-928 3 LH-LAN- 0 (01/03 )
§ 402.06 Coordination with other environmental reviews. ( a ) Consultation, conference, and biological assessment procedures under section 7 may be consolidated with interagency cooperation procedures required by other statutes, such as the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 *et seq.,* implemented at 40 CFR parts 1500-1508) or the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (FWCA) (16 U.S.C. 661 *et seq.*). Satisfying the requirements of these other statutes, however, does not in itself relieve a Federal agency of its obligations to comply with the procedures set forth in this part or the substantive requirements of section 7. The Service will attempt to provide a coordinated review and analysis of all environmental requirements.
( b ) Where the consultation or conference has been consolidated with the interagency cooperation procedures required by other statutes such as NEPA or FWCA, the results should be included in the documents required by those statutes.
#### § 24.134 Co-channel separation criteria.

The minimum co-channel separation distance between base stations in different service areas is 113 kilometers (70 miles). A co-channel separation distance is not required for the base stations of the same licensee or when the affected parties have agreed to other co-channel separation distances.
### U.S. Department of Transportation Office ofthe Secretary ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, DC 20590 Mr. Russell E. Pommer Associate General Counsel and Senior Director, Regulatory Affairs 801 1 

## ih St. NW, Ste. 410 Washington, D.C. 20006 Issue date: August 18, 2014 Authority expires: October 28 , 2014



# ~nternational Aviation
NOTICE OF CONSISTENCY Atlas Air, Inc. is a properly certificated carrier that holds authority to conduct charter operations to and from China. Based on a proposal submitted by the carrier, we have determined that the operations comply with the applicable Department regulations and the provisions ofthe 2014-2015 U.S.-China Protocol. Number ofFlights: one (1) one-way charter 1 Flight Date(s): August 26, 2014 Points: PVG-ANC*-ORD Equipment: B747 The U.S. carrier operating the above charter flight should report, in writing, to the U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division (X-44), Office ofInternational Aviation, Department ofTransportation, on its operation for the preceding month by the tenth ofeach month whether the flights operated. This notice is valid only for the flight contained in the above program. * Denotes technical stop only. An electronic version of this document i s available on the World W id

e W eb at: www.regulations
.gov

1 Following our grant ofAtlas Air Inc.'s request for one (1) one-way charter allocation , 74 one-way charter allocations remain available in the Zone 1 charter pool for the 2014/ 15 charter year.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

     <ARTICLE> 5
     <MULTIPLIER> 1

     <PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1997

     <PERIOD-TYPE>                                    YEAR

     <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997

     <CASH>                                          12,231

     <SECURITIES>                                         0

     <RECEIVABLES>                                   34,745

     <ALLOWANCES>                                         0

     <INVENTORY>                                          0

     <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,976

     <PP&E>                                       6,020,481

     <DEPRECIATION>                               1,942,276

     <TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,130,181

     <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          115,611

     <BONDS>                                        585,595

     <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0

     <PREFERRED>                                          0

     <COMMON>                                       100,522

     <OTHER-SE>                                   3,328,453

     <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,130,181

     <SALES>                                        191,291

     <TOTAL-REVENUES>                               191,291

     <CGS>                                                0

     <TOTAL-COSTS>                                  677,462

     <OTHER-EXPENSES>                               329,383

     <LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,179

     <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             291,336

     <INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,006,980)

     <INCOME-TAX>                                         0

     <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0

     <DISCONTINUED>                                       0

     <EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0

     <CHANGES>                                            0

     <NET-INCOME>                                (1,006,980)

     <EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.16)

     <EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.16)


</TABLE>
§ 95.2989 PLB and MSLD technical standards. ( a ) PLB transmitter types must be designed to comply with technical standard RTCM 1010.2. MSLD transmitter types must be designed to comply with technical standard RTCM 11901.1.
( b ) *Incorporation by reference.* The material listed in this paragraph (b) is incorporated by reference in this section with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved incorporation by reference (IBR) material is available for inspection at the FCC and the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). Contact the FCC through the Federal Communications Commission's Reference Information Center, phone: (202) 418-0270. For information on the availability of this material at NARA, visit *www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html* or email *fr.inspection@nara.gov .* The material may be obtained from the following source in this paragraph (b): ( 1 ) The following standards are available from the Radio Technical Commission for Maritime Services, 1611 N. Kent St., Suite 605, Arlington, Virginia 22209-2128. ( i ) RTCM 11010.2, “406 MHz Satellite Personal Locator Beacons (PLBs),” including Amendments 1 and 2, dated June 8, 2012 (RTCM 11010).
( ii ) RTCM 11901.1, “Maritime Survivor Locating Devices (MSLD),” dated June 4, 2012.
( 2 ) [Reserved].
[82 FR 41104, Aug. 29, 2017, as amended at 85 FR 64411, Oct. 13, 2020; 88 FR 21451, Apr. 10, 2023]
# EUR-Lex - 11997M042 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11997M042

**Treaty on European Union (consolidated version) - Title VI: Provisions on police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Article 42 **

*
Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0168 - Consolidated version *

Treaty on European Union (consolidated version)

Article 42

The Council, acting unanimously on the initiative of the Commission or a Member State, and after consulting the European Parliament, may decide that action in areas referred to in Article 29 shall fall under Title IV of the Treaty establishing the European Community, and at the same time determine the relevant voting conditions relating to it. It shall recommend the Member States to adopt that decision in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements.
#### § 260.57 How samples are drawn by inspectors or licensed samplers.

An inspector or a licensed sampler shall select samples, upon request, from designated lots of processed products which are so placed as to permit thorough and proper sampling in accordance with the regulations in this part. Such person shall, unless otherwise directed by the Secretary, select sample units of such products at random, and from various locations in each lot in such manner and number, not inconsistent with the regulations in this part, as to secure a representative sample of the lot. Samples drawn for inspection shall be furnished by the applicant at no cost to the Department.
EXHIBIT 32-2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT FUND VI, L.P., SERIES 7 (the “Partnership”) for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Melanie R. Wenk, Vice President-Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.








/s/MELANIE R. WENK


Melanie R. Wenk


Vice President-Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.





Date: February 9, 2011
Exhibit
10.1





DESCRIPTION
OF DIRECTORS AND


NAMED
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS COMPENSATION





In accordance with the “Frequently
Asked Questions” bulletin posted by the staff of the Division of Corporation
Finance of the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 23, 2004 on the
Securities and Exchange Commission’s website, we are disclosing the following
information that the Securities and Exchange Commission may deem to be material
definitive agreements with our directors and executive officers.





In 2009,
non-employee directors of Bancorp will receive a fee of $1,550 per
meeting.  Each director of Bancorp is also a director of the
Bank.  Meetings of the directors of Bancorp are held immediately
before or after meetings of the directors of the Bank. In 2009, non-employee
directors of the Bank will receive $750 per attended meeting, with the
Vice-Chairman receiving $5,500 per attended meeting. In addition, each
non-employee committee member will receive the following: $300 per Compliance
Committee meeting; $880 per Compensation Committee meeting; $800 per Corporate
Governance Committee meeting; and $880 per Audit and Examining Committee
meeting.  The Chairman of the committees will receive a fee of up to
$270 per committee meeting.  The Board members receive no additional
compensation for acting as the Nominating Committee.




We have not entered into employment
agreements with any of the executive officers, who are employed on an at-will
basis.  In 2009, the Bank’s executive officers will earn the annual
base salaries set forth opposite their names below and will be entitled to a
bonus, if any, as determined by the Compensation Committee:





Name
                        Title
                        2009 SalaryAlan
      J. Hyatt
                        President
      and Chief Executive Officer
                        $338,000S.
      Scott Kirkley
                        Executive
      Vice President
                        $200,000*Thomas
      G. Bevivino
                        Executive
      Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and
      Treasurer
                        $188,000





The executive officers are entitled to
participate in the Bank’s 401(k) Plan and in an Employee Stock Ownership
Plan.  The Bank makes a matching contribution of 50% of each executive
officer’s 401(k) Plan contribution up to 6% of such executive officer’s salary,
and an additional non-matching contribution at the discretion of the Board of
Directors.  In addition, the Bank pays the health insurance premiums
for Mr. Kirkley and Mr. Bevivino.  Executive officers are eligible for
equity-based awards under our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan.


























*Mr.
Kirkley has taken a six-month leave of absence effective February 9, 2009, for
personal reasons.  During his leave of absence, he will receive salary
at an annual rate of $100,000.










Exhibit 10.1 -- Page 1
--
# EUR-Lex - 11997M046 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11997M046

**Treaty on European Union (consolidated version) - Title VIII: Final provisions - Article 46 - Article L - EU Treaty (Maastricht 1992) **

*
Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0170 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 191 , 29/07/1992 P. 0063 *

Treaty on European Union (consolidated version)

Article 46

The provisions of the Treaty establishing the European Community, the Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community and the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community concerning the powers of the Court of Justice of the European Communities and the exercise of those powers shall apply only to the following provisions of this Treaty:

(a) provisions amending the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community with a view to establishing the European Community, the Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community and the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community;

(b) provisions of Title VI, under the conditions provided for by Article 35;

(c) provisions of Title VII, under the conditions provided for by Article 11 of the Treaty establishing the European Community and Article 40 of this Treaty;

(d) Article 6(2) with regard to action of the institutions, insofar as the Court has jurisdiction under the Treaties establishing the European Communities and under this Treaty;

(e) Articles 46 to 53.
EXHIBIT 99.2
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jupitermedia Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Christopher J. Baudouin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Christopher J. Baudouin
----------------------------------
Christopher J. Baudouin
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2002


THIS CERTIFICATION IS MADE SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, SUBJECT
TO THE KNOWLEDGE STANDARD THEREIN, AND NOT FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE.