alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE 

 OF MARYLAND * COURT OF APPEALS

 * OF MARYLAND

Petitioner *

v. * Misc. Docket AG No. 4 & 24

 * September Term, 2015

 *

MARIA REBECCA FLYNN * Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County

 *

Respondent. * Case No. C-02-15-00092/C-02-15-002331

 

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the parties’ Joint Petition for Indefinite 

Suspension by Consent in the above entitled matter, it is this 14th day of August, 2015;

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Joint Petition be, and it is 

hereby GRANTED; and it is further, 

 ORDERED, that the Respondent, Maria Rebecca Flynn, is hereby indefinitely 

suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland for engaging in professional 

misconduct involving violations of Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct 1.1, 1.3, 

1.4, 1.5(a), 1.8(a) and (h), 1.15, 1.16(d), 5.3, 7.1(a) and (b), 8.1 and 8.4(a)(c) and (d); Business 

Occupations and Professions Art., Md. Code Ann. §10-306 and Md. Rules 16-606.1, 16-607 

and 16-609; and it is further,

ORDERED, that, the Clerk of the Court shall remove the name of Maria Rebecca Flynn 

from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund of 

the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with 

Maryland Rule 16-772(d).

/s/ Clayton Greene Jr.

Judge
Case 16-28480 Doc 1 Filed 09/06/16 Entered 09/06/16 12:19:47 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 9
Case 16-28480 Doc 1 Filed 09/06/16 Entered 09/06/16 12:19:47 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 9
Case 16-28480 Doc 1 Filed 09/06/16 Entered 09/06/16 12:19:47 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 9
Case 16-28480 Doc 1 Filed 09/06/16 Entered 09/06/16 12:19:47 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 9
Case 16-28480 Doc 1 Filed 09/06/16 Entered 09/06/16 12:19:47 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 9
Case 16-28480 Doc 1 Filed 09/06/16 Entered 09/06/16 12:19:47 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 9
Case 16-28480 Doc 1 Filed 09/06/16 Entered 09/06/16 12:19:47 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 9
Case 16-28480 Doc 1 Filed 09/06/16 Entered 09/06/16 12:19:47 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 9
Case 16-28480 Doc 1 Filed 09/06/16 Entered 09/06/16 12:19:47 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 9
§ 26.22 General exception for entry. ( a ) Any person entering or using any national wildlife refuge will comply with the regulations in this subchapter C, the provisions of any special regulations and any other official notification as is appropriate under § 25.31.
( b ) A permit shall be required for any person entering a national wildlife refuge, unless otherwise provided under the provisions of subchapter C. The permittee will abide by all the terms and conditions set forth in the permit.
Jim Berg – PHOTECHS, Eden Prairie Minnesota - Section 333 Exemption Petition

02-25-16

U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Exemption Request Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act of the Federal Aviation Regulations 

from 14 C.F.R. 45.23(b); 14 C.F.R. Part 21; 14 C.F.R. 61.113(a)&(b); 91.7(a); 91.9(b) (2); 

91.103(b); 91.109; 119.121; 91.151(a); 91.203(a)&(b); 91.405(a); 91.407(a) (1); 91.409(a) (2); 

91.417(a)&(b) 

Dear Sir or Madam, 

Pursuant to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 and the procedures contained 

within 14 C.F.R. 11, to request that PHOTECHS, an owner and operator of small unmanned 

aircraft, be exempted from the Federal Aviation Regulations (“FARs”) listed below so that 

Photechs may operate small lightweight unmanned aircraft system (“UAS”) in commercially 

regulated airspace by the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”). 

Following exemption and approval by the FAA, PHOTECHS will use professionally built models 

from DJI (DJI Phantom2, DJI Phantom3, DJI Phantom4, and DJI Inspire) UAS equipped with 

cameras for the following applications: 

Aerial videography/cinematography to safely enhance films and commercials, augmentation of 

real estate listing videos and marketing, and the photography of architecture, golf courses, news 

and events that would be enhanced by aerial imaging.

The requested exemption would permit the commercial operation of small, UASs for commercial 

use in controlled areas for the purposes listed above.

Please contact me at any time if you require additional information or clarification.

PHOTECHS Media

Owner: Jim Berg

Phone 952-934-2035

Email: info@photechs.com
September 3, 2015

Mr. Gerald Kerr

9828 Whisperwood Lane

Brighton, MI 48116

- 8859

Dear Mr. Kerr :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your June 17 , exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 1618 ),

but we are unable to process your request any furthe r. The information you sent does no t

comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any

further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the e xtent of the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would no t adversely affect safety or ho w the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal2

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption a t

least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If

you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure3
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1535/2005

of 22 September 2005         

amending Regulation (EC) No 1063/2005 as regards the quantity covered by the standing invitation to tender for the export of common wheat held by the Czech intervention agency

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereal (1), and in particular Article 6 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1063/2005 is replaced by the following:

‘Article 2

The invitation to tender shall cover a maximum of 275 911 tonnes of common wheat for export to third countries with the exception of Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Liechtenstein, Romania, Serbia and Montenegro (*1) and Switzerland.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 September 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

(2)OJ L 174, 7.7.2005, p. 36.

----
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with Amendment No. 2 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q
of I/OMagic Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the
"Report"), the undersigned hereby certify in their capacities as Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. [Omitted].


Dated:   January 30, 2006                   By:  /s/ Tony Shahbaz
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Tony Shahbaz,
                                                 Chief Executive Officer



Dated:   January 30, 2006                   By:  /s/ Steve Gillings
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Steve Gillings,
                                                 Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of these written statements required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures
that appear typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
U.S. Department of Justice

Office of Community Oriented Policing Services

 Fact Sheet www.cops.usdoj.gov

2017 COPS Office Preparing for Active Shooter 

Situations (PASS) Training Program Awards

The Office of Community Oriented Policing Services 

(COPS Office) Preparing for Active Shooter Situations 

(PASS) Training Program is designed to increase public 

safety by providing funds for scenario-based training that 

prepares officers and other first responders to safely and 

effectively handle active-shooter and other violent threats.

PASS Award

The 2017 PASS Training Program funded projects that will 

provide training to meet the goal of the 2016 Protecting 

Our Lives by Initiating COPS Expansion (POLICE) Act 

in offering “scenario-based, integrated response courses 

designed to counter active shooter threats or acts of terrorism 

against individuals or facilities.”1

The full listing of awarded projects is located on the COPS 

Office website.

1. 42 U.S.C. § 3796dd(b)(17).

Funding Provisions

In FY 2017, the COPS Office awarded over $5 million 

under the PASS Training Program. Funding was awarded 

with the following provisions:

 PASS provides funds to training providers who can offer 

integrated, scenario-based response courses as described 

in the 2016 POLICE Act.

 PASS-funded providers have substantial experience 

with providing and tailoring cross-disciplinary active 

shooter training to law enforcement and other first 

responders nationally.

 PASS funding may be used to provide supplemental 

resources to help officers maintain these vital but 

perishable skills—including scenario libraries and 

e-learning modules—and to enhance agency skills in 

tactical medicine and managing exposure to trauma.

Contact the COPS Office

For more information about the COPS Office Preparing for Active Shooter Situations Program, please call the 

COPS Office Response Center at 800-421-6770 or visit the COPS Office online at www.cops.usdoj.gov.

Published 2017
§ 501.7 Agency review of requests for amendment or correction of a record. ( a ) Where possible, each request for amendment or correction shall be reviewed, and a determination on the request made, by the Privacy Officer within 10 days of receipt (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and holidays). Requests shall be acknowledged within that period where insufficient information has been provided to enable action to be taken. An acknowledgement shall inform the individual making the request of the estimated time within which a disposition of the request is expected to be made, and shall prescribe such further information as may be necessary to process the request. The request shall be granted, or an initial decision to deny shall be made, within ten days of receipt of all information specified in the acknowledgement (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and holidays).
( b ) Within 30 days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and holidays) after arriving at a decision on a request, the Privacy Officer shall either: ( 1 ) Make the requested amendment or correction, in whole or in part, and advise the individual in writing of such action; or,
( 2 ) Advise the individual in writing that the request has been initially denied, in whole or in part, stating, with respect to those portions denied; ( i ) The date of the denial;
( ii ) The reasons for the denial, including a citation to an appropriate section of the Act and these Rules; and,
( iii ) The right of the individual to prosecute an appeal and to obtain judicial review should a final denial result from the appeal.
( c ) In reviewing a request for amendment or correction of a record, the Privacy Officer shall consider the following criteria: ( 1 ) The sufficiency of the evidence submitted by the individual;
( 2 ) The factual accuracy of the information sought to be amended or corrected;
( 3 ) The relevance and necessity of the information sought to be amended or corrected in terms of the purposes for which it was collected;
( 4 ) The timeliness and currency of the information sought to be amended or corrected in terms of the purposes for which it was collected;
( 5 ) The completeness of the information sought to be amended or corrected in terms of the purposes for which it was collected;
( 6 ) The degree of possibility that denial of the request could unfairly result in determinations adverse to the individual;
( 7 ) The character of the record sought to be corrected or amended; and,
( 8 ) The propriety and feasibility of complying with the specific means of correction or amendment requested by the individual. If an amendment or correction is otherwise permissible under the Act and other relevant statutes, a request shall be denied only if the individual has failed to establish, by a preponderance of the evidence, the propriety of the amendment or correction in light of these criteria.
[40 FR 49276, Oct. 21, 1975, as amended at 41 FR 5, Jan. 2, 1976]
[No. 1924.]

#### A. G. McPherson *v.*The State.

[Opinion delivered January 27, 1886.]

Theft.—Indictment failing to allege that the property was fraudulently taken is insufficient to charge the offense of theft.

Appeal from the District Court of Grayson. Tried below before the Hon. E. Maltbie.

The conviction was for the felonious theft of hogs, the property of W. H. Bledsoe, in Grayson county, Texas, on the 25th day of March, 1885. A term of two years in the penitentiary was the punishment awarded the appellant.

No brief for the appellant.

*J. H.*Burts, Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

Willson, Judge.

This conviction must be set aside, and the prosecution must be dismissed because the indictment is fatally defective. It does not allege that the property was fraudulently taken. *(Ware*v. *The*State, 19 Texas Ct. App., 13; *Spain*v. *The*State, id., 469; *Sloan*v. *The*State, 18 Texas Ct. App., 225.)

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution dismissed.

*Reversed and dismissed.*
## Operation Description (see page 2 for details)

## Details

1. customers' Sites. Based on.current



## -~~~~~~~- is sold to-customers. on kg/year or



# approximate~gallons/year in ••• 

# I!IIIIJiiil·····

11. Release 1 is based on washing the blend tank after blending. Inpractice this may not be done at some customers as they willfollow with ano1her batch ofsoluble oil ofa different composition Without washing between batches. The -release 

### is based on a 2% yield loss for batch 

### containingll% ofthe new subStance. 111. Release 2 essentially nit Material from cleaning of

### drum hoses is included rv. take place at

v. programs and ultimately v1. mostcommonmethod-ofdisposal of is acid/alum splitting ofthe fluid'into 

### its oil and water orgamcs water soluble -wiUpartition

### to the oil phase. The oil phase is transported to offsite reclamation and either_re.,.refmed or incinerated for fuel value. The-arenormally removed from the water phase utilizing flocculating agents and disposed ofin a similar rnarmer. Very large 

### •••• c:enters.may have their own on.:.site bio-pond and waste treatment system
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Rochester Medical Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Anthony J. Conway, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Anthony J. Conway

Anthony J. ConwayChief Executive OfficerDecember 17, 2003


-59-
Home
About
2020 Federal View Point Survey Results
	About DTIC
	Administrator
	Announcements
	Contact Us
	DTIC’s Past and Future
	DTIC Strategic Plan
	Employment
	Sitemap
Products & Services
DTIC’s Products & Services
	DTIC Registration Benefits
	DTIC Combatant Command (CCMD) Classified Reading Room
	Training
Submit Documents
Sign In
Operating Status
 Defense Technical Information Center
				*Search this site, DoD S&T Reports, and more..*

**Internet Explorer Users:** It is recommended that you use the Google Chrome or Microsoft Edge browser for an optimal experience with this application as Microsoft’s support for Internet Explorer is ending.
	DISMISS Corporate Source Icon
			Corporate Source Authority System

The Corporate Source Authority System (CSAS) lists all organizations that have contributed information to any of DTIC's three major databases (Technical Reports, Research Summaries and IR&D). Each organization is assigned a 6-digit Source Code used to search these databases for information authored or sponsored by the organization. Each Corporate Author record displays the root (highest) element of the organization, the parent (next higher) element of the organization, any sub-organizations or former names, and the organization's Source Code.

Please send an email to request a DTIC Corporate Source Code or to check the status of a pending request.
**Email**

The current Corporate Source is available for download in the following formats:


HTML - Corporate_Source.html 

TEXT - Corporate_Source.txt
 **DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER**
8725 John J. Kingman Road
Fort Belvoir, Virginia 22060-6218
(800) 225-3842https://Discover.DTIC.mil
			AdministratorContact UsDoD Privacy ProgramEEOEmploymentFOIAInformation Analysis Centers
			Information QualityLegalMission StatementNo FEAR ActOpen GovernmentPlain Language
			Policy MemorandaPrivacy PolicySAPRStrategic PlanSubmit DocumentsUSA.govUSD(R&E)
			LinkedIn

NOTICE:  The appearance of hyperlinks does not constitute endorsement by the DTIC of non-U.S. Government sites or the information, products, or services contained therein.  Although the DTIC may or may not use these sites as additional distribution channels for Department of Defense information, it does not exercise editorial control over all of the information that you may find at these locations.  Such hyperlinks are provided consistent with the stated purpose of this website. The DTIC bears no responsibility for the accuracy, legality or content of the external website or for that of subsequent links. Contact the external website for answers to questions regarding its content. Please let us know about existing external links which you believe are inappropriate.
VISTA EYECARE, INC.

                              SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

Name of Subsidiary                                Jurisdiction of Incorporation
------------------                                -----------------------------

Midwest Vision, Inc.                                          Minnesota

NVAL Healthcare Systems, Inc.                                  Georgia

NVAL Visioncare Systems of California, Inc.                  California

NVAL Visioncare Systems of North Carolina, Inc.            North Carolina

International Vision Associates, Ltd.                          Georgia

Mexican Vision Associates, S.A. de C.V.                        Mexico

Mexican Vision Associates Operadora,
S. de R.L. de C.V.                                             Mexico

Mexican Vision Associates Servicios,
S. de R.L. de C.V.                                             Mexico

New West Eyeworks, Inc.                                       Delaware

Frame-n-Lens Optical, Inc.                                   California

Vision Administrators, Inc                                   California

ProCare Eye Exam, Inc.                                       California

Family Vision Centers, Inc.                                   Delaware
# EUR-Lex - 11992M/PRO/SEBC/22 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11992M/PRO/SEBC/22

**Treaty on European Union - Protocol on the statute of the european system of central banks and of the European Central Bank - Chapter IV: Monetary functions and operations of the ESCB - Article 22: Clearing and payment systems **

*
Official Journal C 191 , 29/07/1992 P. 0073 *

Article 22

Clearing and payment systems

The ECB and national central banks may provide facilities, and the ECB may make regulations, to ensure efficient and sound clearing and payment systems within the Community and with other countries.