INLET AND OUTLET 

SOURCE TESTING REPOR.T 

ON TI3E TUN-NEL KILN SCRUBBER 

HANLEY PLANT 

GLEN-GERY CORPORATZON 

SUMM[ERVILLE, PEN1o1SYL''VANIA 

Testing Dates: April 26 and 27, 2005 

Prepared for: 

Glen-Gery Corporation 

Route 61, 423 S. Pottsville Pike 

P.O. Box 340 

Shoemakersville, Pennsylvania 19555-0340 

Prepared by: 

Air/Compliance Consultants, Inc. 

1050 William Pitt Way 

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15238 

412-826-3636 

PA Lab Registration #: 02-742 

Project No. 05-083 

Air/tompliance 

Consultants,lnc. 
XNI,ET A.ND OUTLET 

SOURCE 'I'ESTING REPORT 

ON TH3E TUNNEI., KILN S CRUBBER 

HANLF'Y PLA.NT 

GLEN-GER'Y CORPOR.A.TZON 

SUMMERVILLE, PENIti1SYL,VANIA 

Testing 13ates: April 26 and 27, 2005 

Prepared for: 

Glen-Gery Corporation 

Route 61, 423 S. Pottsville Pike 

P.O. Box 340 

Shoemakersville, Pennsylvania 19555-0340 

Prepared by: 

Air/Compliance Consultants, Znc. 

1050 William Pitt Way 

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvarria 15238 

412-826-3636 

PA Lab Registration #: 02-742 

Project No. 05-083 

P . 1 
SOURCE TEST REPORT S'I'ATEMEI`IT 

This statement signed by the on-site supervisor of the test tearn and the source 

oujner/operator certifies that "to the best of th.exr knowledge" the source test repozt has 

been checked for completeness, and that the results presented are accurate, error-iree, 

Ipg ble, and representative of the actual eznissions measured during testing. 

un-one oupervisor oz tne I esc a eaxn 

,Air/Compliance Consurtants, Inc_ 

Rbbf- ~'z4: 

5 b Ut-6 6 :ft*.'C- ti~0pe kaT 6 -fttla,flve: 

P. 2 
TABLE OF CONTEN'I'S 

Pa,c-,e 

1. ZNTRODUCTION .......................................------------...-----............-.----.............-.---..........----...........4 

2. TEST PERSONNEL ................................................................................................-•----........._.....4 

3. SOURCE DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................•-----.._._4 

4. TESTING METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................................... .5 

4.1. FLOW RATE, MOLECULAR WEIGHT AND iV10ZSTURE DETERMINATZONS ....... 5 

4.2. PARTZCULATE MATTER, HYDROCHLORIC AND HYDROFLUORlC ACZD ......... 5 

4.3. SULFUR DIOXIDE AND SULFURIC ACID MIST ........................................................6 

- 

4_4. CEM DETERMTNATIONS ........................•-•----._............-.-----.........--------.........-.---............6 

S . TEST RESULTS ....--. ........................................------....----------.............._.._.._........----.----._......._.......7 

6 . CONCLUSION ............................................................................-------............_......_......----.......-.---8 

VYf`'TT't?Ti`C 

1. Process Flow Diagram 

2_ Scrubber Znlet Sampling Location Schematic 

3. Scrubber Outlet Sampling Location Schematic 

4. CEMS Trailer Znstrument Configuration 

' 7` A Y? 7'G' C 

I. Particulate Matter, Hydrochloric Acid, and Hydrofluonc Acid T est Results, ScnZ bber Znlet 

Duct, April 26-27, 2005 

2. Particulate Matter, Hydrochloric Acid, Hydrofluoric Acid and CEM Test Results, Scrubber 

Exhaust Stack, April 26-27 72005 

3. Sulfwr Dioxide and Sulfuric Acid Mist Test Results, Scrubber Znlet Duct, April 26-27, 2005 

4. Sulfur Dioxide and Sulfuric Acid Mist Test Results, Scrubber Exhaust Stack, 

April 26-27, 2005 

5. Table Nomenclature 

APPENDICES 

A. Testing Protocol and Relevant Correspondence 

B. Computerized Data Sheets and Field Data Sheets 

C. Equipment Calibrations and Certification Data 

D. Plant Process Data 

E. Laboratory Analytical Data 

F. Sam.ple Calculations 

P. 3 
INLET AND OUTLE`I` 

SO-URCE TES'I'ING REPORT 

ON 7~HE TUNNEL KILN SCRUBBER 

HAN L]E'Y PLANT 

GLEN-GERY CORPORA.TxON 

SUlYIMERVILLE, PENNSYL'VANIA 

1. INTRODUCTION 

Air/Compliance Consultants, Ine. (ACCI) conducted a compliance testing program on the scrubber 

inlet duct and exhaust stack for Glen-Gery Corporation (Glen-Gery) at the Ha.nley Plant in 

Surnmerville, Pennsylvania_ T esting was performed for particulate matter (PM), hydrochloric acid 

(HCl), hydrofluonic acid (HF), sulfur dioxide (S02), and sulfuric acid mist (H2SO4) simultaneously 

at both locations_ Gaseous emission testing was conducted only at the outlet location for oxides of 

nitrogen (NOX). Testing was completed at the request of the Pennsylvania Department of 

Environrnental Protection (PADEP). 

2. TEST PERSONNEL 

Testing was performed on April 26 and 27, 2005. The ACCI test team consisted of Mr. James 

Phillippi, Senior Project rv,tanager; Mr. Michael Matvey, Scientist; Mr. William Cowell, Senior 

Enigneer; Mr. Eric White, Senior Technician; and Mr. Patrick Walters, Technician. Mr. Hubert T. 

Flaherty of PADEP observed portions of the testing prograrn. Mr. Robert Stewart represented 

Glen-Gery. 

3. SOURCE DESCRXPTION 

Glen-Gery operates a tunnel kaln to manufacture architectural brick. The Plan A.pproval Nuxnber 

for this source is 33-055A, and was issued on May X, 2002. The natural gas-fired kiln has a 

permitted capacity of 60 MM BEP/year, (16.62 tons/hour). The air pollution control device 

(APCD) for the kiln is a Catenary Grid Scrubber using magnesiurn hydroxide (M b[OH] z) as the 

scrubbing liquor_ The scrubber was designed and installed by CECO Fzlters. The unit has a 

capacity of 45,600 actual cubic feet per minute (ACFM) at 450 degrees Fahrenheit (°F). A process 

flow diagram is included as Figure 1. 

7:IAPR0!FCT1GIen-Gery Stick105-083 Summervil!elReporllCOMPtIAtJCE RcPORT-SCRUBBER.doc 

P . 4 
4. TESTIitiTG METHODa1L(3GY 

ACCI conducted the measurements in accordance with the United States Environmental Protectzon 

Agency (USEPA) Title 40 Code of Federal Regulatzons (CFR), Part 60 Appendix A, Testing 

Methods, and the PADEP Source Testing Manual_ Four test runs for each pollutant were conducted 

at four different scrubber operating parameters. Run 1 was conducted with 2 pumps operating and 

a scrubber solution pH of 5.45; Run 2 wzth 1 pump operating and a pH of 5.5; Run 3 with 2 pumps 

operating and a pH of 6.28; and Run 4 with 2 pumps operating and a pH of 4.53. 

4.1. Flow Rate, N.[olecular Weight and Moisture Determinations 

ACCI conducted testing in accordance with USEPA Methods 1 through 4 at the scrubber inlet duct 

and exhaust stack. U'SEPA Method 1 was followed for selection of traverse points. Twenty-four 

sa.mpling points were utilized at the outlet location, 12 in each of 2 test ports. Twelve sainpling 

points were utilized at the inlet location, 6 in each of 2 test ports. Figures 2 and 3 include stack 

diagrams of the inlet to the sczubber and the scnzbber exhaust, respectively_ USEPA Method 2 was 

followed for the determination of gas velocity and volumetric flow rate. This procedure utilized an 

S-type Pitot tube and inclined manometer to determine stack-gas velocity head. USEPA ivletl -lods 3 

and 3A were utilized for the determination of CO?, 02, and stack-gas molecular weight_ Nztrogen 

(N2) was determined by the difference. 

USEPA Method 4 was followed to determine the gas rnoisture content of the exhaust gas. A 

moistuxe determination was perfoxmed on each test run to allow determination of dry stack-gas 

nrzolecular weight and to calculate the dry standard cubic f.eet per minute (DSCFM) flow rate. The 

Method 4 train was incorporated with both the Method 5/26A sampling train and the Method 8 

sampling trazn. 

4.2. Particulate Matter, Hydrochlorzc and Hydrofluoric Acid 

USEPA Method 5 was followed to determine PM concentrations and mass emission rates. The 

Method 5 sample train included a glass n.ozzle, heated glass--lined probe, heated fllter, and chilled 

impinger trazn_ The front-half catch, which includes the acetone probe rinse, filter, and .front-half 

L:1APR0.fECllG1Pn-Gery E3rlck\05-083 Summerviile\fteport\COMPLlANCE ftEPOR7•SCRUBBER.doc 

P. 5 
i Iter llolder acetone rinse, was gravimetrically analyzed to determine PIv1 emissions from the 

source_ USEPA IVlethod 5 testing was coinbined with the USEPA Metllod 26A tests. 

ACCI determined the HCI and HF emission rates using USEPA Method 26A_ The back-half 

catch, which consisted of disti.11cd water rinses of the back-half filter holder, all connecting 

glassware, impinger catch, and rinses, were a.nalyzed by ion chromatography (IC) to determine 

the Hl and HF concentrations. The last 0.1N 1_12SO4impinger was analyzed separately to 

determine collection efficiency. Collection efficiency for both HCl and HF was 100%. Two 

USEPA audit samples were obtained and analyzed concurrently with the emission samples. 

The HCl audit 'samples were within specifzcations and were accepted_ HCl and HF samples were 

analyzed by Air Quality Services (AQS), PA L.aboratoz -y R.egistration Number 02-41 l. Chain of 

Custody Forms accompanied samples during shipment. 

4.3. Sulfur Dioxide and Sulfuric Aci.d 1VZxst 

USEPA. Method 8 was foll.owed to ineasure S0 2and H2SO4 emissions in the stack gases_ This 

method utilizes a glass nozzle and heated glass-lined probe which is cornnected directly to the 

impinger train. The first two ixnpingers contained an 80% isopr.opyl alcohol mixture. A.n 

unheated glass-fiber filter was inserted after the second impinger; the third and fourth impingers 

contained a 3% hydrogen peroxide mixture; and the fifth impinger contained silica gel. The 

second and fourth impingers were analyzed separately to determine collection efficiencies: Inlet 

and outlet testing were conducted simultaneously. Sampling trains were purged with clean 

ambient air at 0.75 cubic feet per rninute (cfm) for 15 minutes using separate pumps after the 

ftnal leak check was completed. Saxnples were analyzed using IC by AQS_ 

The collection efficiency (4 test runs) for the S02 sampling was 97.25%. The average collection 

efficiency (4 test runs) for the H2SO4 sampling was 100%. 

4.4. CEM Determinations 

ACCI utilized a mobile continuous emission monitoring (CEM) vehicle for determining NO,, 

concentratrons in the scrubber exhaust stack. USEPA Method 205, in conjunction with USEPA 

Protocol I gases, was used to create the correct range of calibration gases to verify the 

Z:IAPR0JL"CT1GIen-Gery Brick105-083 SummervillelReporliCOMPLIANCE REPORT-SCRUBBER.doc 

P. 6 
instrumentation used in the test program. USEPA Method 3A was conducted during the Method 

5/26A sampling runs in the exhaust stacic. 

4.4.1. NOY Determinations 

USEPA Method 7E was used to continuously measure NTO,{concentrations in the exhaust stack. A 

Thermo Environmental Model 10 chemiluminescent analyzer was used. An extractive gasconditioning system was used to convey the sarnple gas to the analyzer. Figure 4 contains a 

schematic of the CEM system. 

USEPA Protocol calibration gases were utilized to calibrate all Reference Method (RM) 

analyzers. Data acquisition was conducted with a multi-channel Yokogawa datalogger_ Data 

was saznpled continuously and scanned into memory in 2-second intervals. This data was used in 

the emission calculations. 

S. TEST RESULTS 

All test results and pertinent testing parameters are included in the following tables: 

Q Table ]. contains the results of the scrubber inlet PM, HCI, and HF testizig 

* Table 2 contains the results of the scrubber exhaust PM, HCI, HF, and INTO Xtesti.ng 

0 Table 3 contains the results of the scrubber inlet S02 and H2SO4 testing 

0 Table 4 contains the results of the scrubber exbaust S02 and I3: 2SO4testing 

s Table 5 contains the Nomenclature for all 4 Tables 

Appendix A contaxns a copy of the test protocol and relevant agency cornrespondence. To document 

the work perforxned, Appendix B includes aIl field data generated during the program including all 

manual method and computerized field data sheets, CEM l. -nu - nute averages, and computenzed 

spreadsheets. 

Dry gas meter, pitot, thei -mocouple, and nozzle calibration data sheets can be found in A.ppendix C. 

Calibration gas Certifzcates of .Anaiysis and CEM bias sheets are also contained in Appendix C. 

Relevant facility process/production data is contained in Appendix D; and PM, HCI, HF, S0 2 , and 

Z:IAPR0JECT1GIen-Gery 8rick105-083 Summervi11e1Reporl\COMPLIAhCE REPORT-SCRUBBER doc 

P. 7 
HUO4 analytical data is contained in Appendix E. Sample calculations for one complete test nuz of 

each pollutant are contained in Appendix F. 

6. CONCLYJSZ0N 

A compliance test program has been conducted for trleil-Gery Corporation at their Hanley Plant 

located in Summerville, Pennsylvania. All of the testing has yielded data that is considered to be 

representative of the emission rates at fi.he prevailing operating conditzons. 

iAAPR0JCCT1Glen•Gery Brickl05-083 Summer ~ ilSelReuo 1CG`fAP1_IANCE_ REPORT-SCRUBBER.doc 

P. 8 
,;~. _ _ .....-~~,,.~u~w~ ~:,, ~:-,.. _~ •,. 

-- ; =` -- 

P. 9 
LD m 

~ 

F 

~ 

0 

0 

111 

cD 

(-0 

~? 

_~~ _..~. .,.... ._ 

~ 

•,—~ 

~ 

cli . r., 

~ 

~ 

crs 

3 A 

z ~ C) 

~ 

~ 

O rn 

0 

.. 

Cf) ~ 

~ c 

a ~ ~ 9 o 

P-( U 

~ 

~ 

~ 

°3 

a~ 

V ~ } 

~ 

~ 

~ 

a> 

~ 

~ 

i.L 

~ 

0 

n. 

a> 

~ 

i 

.~ 

E 

~ 

~ 

ci ~ 

cc~ 

co 

E 

~$ o 

~ ~ U ~.. ~ m 

I-MONSM 

..~.rf., ~ ~ 

aw U 

ul 

~ 

O 

of, 

Dg 

N 

P. 10 
~ 

iV 

W) ~ 

C.. 

~~ ~+ 

Q

— 

e

MM:~V 

77-

I I' " ~ 

11 

6 

.~ 

O 

N 'd 

~ 

Cl) 

~ UC 

.1 

O O 

Rt P-4 

~A 

~ 

~ ~ 

0 

~ 

N G\ 

cn 

V't r, 00 

~ 

oi 

~ 

U 

.ri 

U 

o0 

kr) Q\ N 

✓ 

~ 

~ c*~ N •--r ~ '—' 

~ 

0 

~ ~ 

~ 

u ~ 

W 

~ 

~ 

~o 

~ 

U 

~ 

H 

Cd 

~ 

U ~ 

o~ 

~ 

~ 

o ~ ~ 

~ p 

~ o 

~ 

~ Cd ~ 

~ O 

s.. 

aU 

~t 

F^4 ' 

p ~ 

~ 

~ 

t., 

ai 

.~^-. 

0 ~ 

b 

e> 

co 

U 

O 

~ 

~ O 

P-4 

bD 

G 

N 

~ 

3 

rn 

tL 

~ 

t3. r~- 

~ 

~ 

N 

I 

d 

~ 

0 U 

0 o v 

P-4 P~ 

~ U 

O co 

~ A En 

~ c+ 

.., W 

U 

cd 

~ Q ~ 

✓ N Q 

U U ~ zQ 

oI C-~ 

N try 

0 

R 

U ~ i 

Q N Q 

~ ~ ~ 

zQ 

~ N 

U) a 

0 

~ 

co 

cfl 

P. ~ ~ 
Q 

~ 

O 

~ 

M 

~ 

,-) a 

U~+ 

R. T~ 

0 0 

L-4 P-a 

m 

t.4 

v 

ca ei 

~ ~~n 

~ 

0 

~c 

O v 

M ,-• 

oo ~p 

rn 

C) 

t~ c+~ 

N00 

N 

O ~f 

c~ ~p 

N 

dd N ~ 

O 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ O"o oo \.o O Nco ON!' N Nt O 

~ M M c*~ 

rn t~ ri N . 

~~~ N'~' 

~ 

N N N•-+ 

-o 

0 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ ti 

~ 

cJ .0 ~ 

E M rt ~n w t~ o0 0~ 

~ a 

z 

~ 

~ 

Q 

I 

~ 

~ 

~ 

o~ 

LLq 

a 

O 

n 

U ` 

CU 

~ 

i--f 

~ +n 

~ 

o O v 

P--4 W 

G U 

O ❑ 

~ ~ ~ 

~ 

~ 

' R ~ ~ 

~ w 

w z R 

~ r V7 

~ 

C3. '4 

O 

~ 

'Ly 

N 

c;3 

U 

~ 

a 

y 

~. 

0 

a 

an ~ 

~ 

~ 

N 

~ 

- OF 

4 i C) 

~ .~ U~ 

tn,~ ~ 

R a Q 

~.zR 

N.01 o 

N 

U 

~ 

E~ 

~ • ~a 

~ •~ 

U ~ 

C1) rn 

o ~ ~ 

H~ 

o' 

a ~ 

a~ 

~ 

H ~ 

w ~ a ° 

Hv 

o ~ 

pq + 

U ~ 

r 

~ u 

~ 

V wi 

•w~ +6~~ 

E ~ g 

V ~ 

0 

P. 12 
---mlm~ r ----L~~ ed 

s~~oos z/*pRoJenno~~omve~mos~v`uv==°°momevnmno"mo1 ~ pw"m4 
TA i. _ _ 

~`. 

P. 14 
Table 1. Pariicutate Matier, Hydrochloric Acid, and Hydrofluoric Acid Test Results, Scrubber Inlet, ApriI 26-27, 2005 

Glen-Gery Corporation, Iianley Plant, Surnmerville, Pennsylvania 

Test Data Run I Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Average 

Date April 26, 2005 ApriI 26, 2005 April 26, 2005 April 27, 2005 

Start'firne 8:00 AM 11:08 AM 2:25 PM 7:50 AM 

End Time 9:02 AM 12:1 I PM 3:26 PM 8:51 AM 

Flow Rate (ACFM) 33,472 32,908 33,244 33,813 33,359 

Flow Rate (SCFM) 20,444 20,037 20,112 20,454 20,262 

Flow Rate (DSCFM) 18,191 18,148 18,498 18,612 18,362 

Sample Volume (DSCF) 54.792 55.366 56.818 56.872 55.962 

Carbon Dioxide (CO2) (dry volume %) 6_00 6.00 6.50 7.00 6.38 

Oxygen (O,) (dry volume %) 11.50 11-50 11.50 11.50 11.50 

V4'ater Vapor (1420) (volume %) 11.02 9.43 8.03 9.01 9.37 

Stack Temperature (°F) 365.6 368_2 373.5 370.7 369.5 

Percent of Isokinetic Sampling (%) 98.45 99.72 100.40 99.88 99.6 

Results 

Particulate Matter 

Mass Collected (m ~) 84_40 137.05 117.10 102_95 110.38 

Emission Concentration (gr/DSCF) 0.0238 0.0382 0.0318 0.0279 0.03 

Emission Rate (Ib/hr) 3.7059 5.9412 5.0421 4.4559 4.79 

Emission Factor (lb/ton product) 0.284 0.455 0.386 0.341 0_367 

Hydrochloric Acid (HCI) 

Emission ivfass (total) (mg) 9.70 11 _20 20.70 13.80 13.85 

Coliection Efficiency (%) 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 200-00% 100.00% 

l:mission Concentration (ppmd „) 4.12 4.71 8_49 5.65 5.74 

Emission Rate (lb/hr) 0_43 0.49 0.89 0-60 0.60 

Emission Factor (lb/ton product) 0_0326 0.037 0.068 0.046 0.046 

I-Iydrotluoric Acici (H;') 

Emission Mass (total) (mo) 348_84 276-2 328.1 3I8.60 317.94 

Collection Efficiency (%) 99.87% 300.00% ] 00.00% 100_00% 99.97% 

Emission Concentration (ppma„) 270.32 211.91 245_ 18 237.85 241.29 

L'mission Rate (Ib/hr) 15.32 11.98 ) 4.13 13.79 13.80 

Emission Factor (lb/ton product) 1.174 0.918 1.083 1.057 1.058 

CFM resulte have been bias calibration corrected. 

Values that are less than 0 are reported as 0 in the Table and are included in the Avera.ge as 0. 

Z:`J.!'RO.JE CT1Glen-Gery Brick\05-083 StlmmervillelField Testing-April 20051G1en-Gery Summerville Tabies, Table 1 6/10/2005 

P. 15 
Table 2. Particulate Matter, Hydrochloric Acid, and Hydrofluoric Acid Test Results, Scrubber Exhaust, April 26-27, 2005 

Gleri-Gery Corporation, lianley Plant, Summerville, Pennsylvania 

Test Data Run I Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Average 

Uate Apri126, 2005 Apri126, 2005 April 26, 2005 April 27, 2005 

Stai-t Time 8:00 AM 11:08 AM 2:25 PM 7:50 A1vt 

Fnd Time 9:03 AM 12:11 PM 3:26 PM 8:51 AIvI 

Flow Rate (ACFM) 29,001 29,918 30,068 29,756 29,686 

Flow Rate (SCFM) 25,209 26,050 25,974 25,811 25,761 

Flow Rate (llSCFM} 22,181 23,061 22,783 22,683 22,677 

Sample Volume (DSCF) 67.297 63.502 55.850 5S.942 60.648 

Carbon Dioaide (COZ) (dry volutne %) 2.12 1.58 0.87 1.02 1.40 

Oxygen (0 2 ) (dry volume %) 17.07 18.14 19.01 19.00 18_31 

Water Vapor(11 20) (volume%) 12.0I 11.47 12.29 12.12 11_97 

Stack Temperature (°P) 119.8 118.5 120_4 120.0 1 19_7 

Percent of isokineiie Sampling (°i°) 97_00 95.22 95.94 96.52 96.2 

Resnits 

1'articulate Matter 

Mass Collected (mg) 168.55 166_60 130.15 127.70 148.25 

Emission Concentration (gr/DSCF) 0.0386 0.0405 0.0360 0.0352 0.0376 

Einission Rate (lb/hr) 7.3473 8.0018 7_0219 6.8483 7.3048 

Emission Factor (lb/ton product) 0.5630 0.6132 0.5381 0.5248 0.5598 

Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) as NO 2 

Emission Concentration (ppind „) 20.4 16.6 10.6 9-3 14.2 

Emission Rate (lb/hr) 3?4 2.74 1.74 1_51 2.31 

Emission Factor (Ib/ton product) 0.249 0.210 0.133 0.116 0.1769 

iiydrochloric Acid (110) 

Emission Mass (total) (ug) <_06 <.06 <,06 <.06 <_06 

Collection Ffficiency (%) NA NA NA NA NA 

F:mission Concentration (ppm&) NA NA NA NA NA 

Emission Rate (lb/hr) NA NA NA NA NA 

Lmission Factor (1b/ton product) NA NA NA NA NA 

Hydrol7uoric Acid (HF) 

Emission Mass (total) (mg) 0.88 5.1 0_8 0.83 1.90 

Coltection Efficiency (%) 100.0% 100.00/0 100.0% 100.0% 100.00% 

D.:mission Concentration (ppmd„) 0.56 3.41 0_61 0.04 1.15 

Emission R-ate (lb/hr) 0.04 0.24 0.04 0.04 0_09 

Fmission Factor (lb/ton product) 0.003 0.019 0.003 0.003 0.007 

CEM results have been bias calibration corrected. 

Values that are less than 0 are reported as 0 in the Table and are included in the Average as 0. 

Z:1AI'ROJE CTIGEen-Gery BricklOS-083 Surnmarvi!le\Fieli 1"Psting-April 20051GIen-Gery Summer„ille Tables, Table 2 6l10/2005 

P. 16 
Tsb1e 3. Sulfur Dioxide and Sulfurie Acid A4ist Test Results, Scrubber inlet Duct, Apci126-27, 2005 

Glen-Gery Corporation, l-Iantey Plant Surm;terville, Pennsylvania. 

Test Data Run I Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Avrrage 

Dste April 26, 2005 April 26, 2005 April 26, 2005 April 27, 2005 

St:ut 1'ime 9:45 AM 12:33 PM 4:28 P-N4 9:08 AM 

F:nd Time 10:48 AM 1:361'M 5:30 PM 10_ 10 AM 

Tlow Rule (ACPM) 33,113 32,677 34,671 33,608 33,517 

i=1ow,Ratr (SCFM) 20,164 19,844 20,956 20,347 20,328 

rlo.v Rate (llSCFM) 17,151 18,600 19,198 18,422 18,343 

Sanlpie Volume (DSCF) 46.043 46.329 49-753 47.695 47.455 

Carbon Dieaide (CO,) (dry volume %) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6-5 6-1 

Oxygen (O,) (dry vrolume %) 11.0 11.5 11.5 11.0 11.3 

Vdater Vapor (1i"0) (volurne %) 14.9 6.3 8.4 9.5 9.8 

Stack Temperature (°F) 368-1 370-3 374.3 370.6 370.8 

Pcreent of Isokinetie Sampling (%) ] 04-4 96.9 100.8 100.7 100.7 

Results Average Averoge 

Runs 1-4 Runs 2-4 

Sulfur Dioxide (SO i) "• 

n•tatis Coilected (mg) 130-5 1184.4 1233.2 1159.80 926.98 1192.47 

Fmissinn Concentration (1bnDSCF) 6.25Y-06 5.64F-OS 5.46E-05 5.361E-05 4.2721:-05 5.487E-OS 

Emission Concentration (ppmd„) 37.6 339.3 329.0 322.75 257.16 330.34 

Emission Concentration (ppnd„ a~ 7% Oi) 52.8 501.8 486.5 347.01 347.01 445.07 

Fmission Rate (Ib/hr) 6.4 62.9 62.9 59.26 47.88 61.70 

Colicction Efficiency (%) 92.0 99.0 99.0 99.0 97.3 99.00 

Ernission Factor (lb/ton product) 0.4927 4.8200 4.8232 3-3786 3.3786 4.34 

Sulfuric Acid (112S0,) 

A4a_<s Collcctcd (rng) 59.0 79.3 101.7 106.70 86.68 95.90 

Fntission Concentratiort (Ib/DSCF) 2.83E-06 3.77F_-06 4.5IE-06 4.932E•06 4.009T-06 4.4041-•06 

Fmiscion Concent:ation (ppma.,) 11.1 14.8 17.7 19-39 15.76 17-31 

F_missionConcentration (ppin,).@7%Oz) 15-6 21.9 26-2 27.23 22.74 25.12 

limi;sion Rate (lb/hr) 2.9 4-2 5.2 4.10 4,10 4.50 

Coltrr,tion Htiiciency (%) 100.0 100-0 100.0 100.0 l00.00 100.00 

Emission Factor (Ibltort product) 0.2228 0.3227 0.3978 0.3144 0.314 0.345 

JU;re>ult tiOm run 1 iS cun5idveJ an Oullier, aver.rge resullti are Rivrn b01h including:fnd "cluding Kun I 

2:1kPROJI-CT\Glen-Gery Srick105-083 SumrnervillelFietd Tesling-April?.005tGfen Gery Summervilir<Tables, Tzb1e3 6/10I2005 

P. 1 7 
'Iable 4. SuiFur Dioxide and Sulfuric Acid Mist Test Results, Scrubber Exhaust Stack, April 26-27, 2005 

Glen-Gery Corporation, i3anley 1'lant, Summerville, Pennsyivania 

_- -- - - -- -- --- 'fest Daia _ - _ _ . Run -t- - --- -- .__ .. ._-. - Run Z -- ------..-_ Run 3 - -- -- Run 4- ... _ .. - Avetage 

Date April 26, 2005 Apri126, 2005 April 26, 2005 Apri127, 2005 

Start Time 9:45 AM 12:33 PM 4:28 PM 9:08 AM 

End Time 10:48 AM 1:36 PM 5:30 Plvl 10: l0 AM 

1 10w Ka;e (ACFM) 29,046 30,070 30,588 29,876 29,895 

Flow Rate (SCFM) 25,260 26,085 26,446 25,932 25,931 

Flow Rate (DSCFM) 22,579 23,027 23,352 22,924 22,970 

Sample Volume (DSCF) 40.178 37.236 38.339 36.844 38.149 

Carbon Dioxide (CO2) (dry volume %) 2-0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 

Oxyaen (O:) (dry volume %) 17.5 17.0 17.0 17-0 17.1 

Watcr Vapor (H20) (volume %) 10.6 11.7 11.7 11.6 11.4 

Stack Temperature (°F) 119.3 118.8 119.9 119.7 119.5 

Fercent of lsokinetic Samplin ~ (%} 96.1 96.8 98.3 96-2 96.9 

Resufts 

Sulfur Dioxide (SO,) 

Mass Coileeted 

Ernission Concentration 

Emission Concentration 

1-3mission Concentration 

Emission Rate 

Emission Factor 

Srrlfuric Acid (11,S0 1) 

tid'ass Coilccted 

1=,niission ConcentratiOn 

Emission Concentration 

Emission Concentration 

Emissiorn Rate 

Emission Factor 

(lnn) 630.1 668.4 355.8 624.9 559.80 

(lb/DSCF) 3.46E-05 3.96E-05 2.05E-05 3.739E-05 3.300E-05 

(ppm&) 208-1 238.2 123.2 225.11 198-67 

(ppm,t„ @ 7% O,) 851-0 849.1 439.0 713 -03 713.03 

(1b/hr) 46.8 54.7 28.7 5) -43 45.40 

(lb/ton product) 3.589 4.190 2.197 3.941 3.479 

(mg) 47.1 57.7 50.5 40.2 48.88 

(lb/DSCF) 2.58L-06 3-42E-06 2.90E-06 2.4051:--06 2.827E-06 

(ppm d,,) 10.2 13.4 11.4 9.46 11.12 

(ppm,l„ @ 7% O,) 41-5 47.9 40.7 43.37 43.37 

(lb/hr) 3-5 4.7 4.1 3.31 3.90 

(Ib/ton product) 0.268 0.362 0.312 0.254 0.299 

Z'!.%+RF:OJECT :Grr n-Gery 8rickl05-063 Summervillelf ie!d Testiny-Apri12005\G!en-Gery Summervi0e Teb!es, Table4 6/1 OR005 

P. 18 
4 

~ 

N P-( 

~ 

U 

C/) 

Q 

U 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

U 

~ 

~ 

0 

'T 

r =] 

~ 

~ 

-~ 

E-{ 

~ 

~ 

~rf 

v~ 

Ln 

(U 

O 

Q 

~ 

H 

C.3 

~ 

A 

'C3 ~ 

~ O 

~ U 

p U 

~ 

•~ ~ _O 

D 

.~ 

U 

Ei 

y 

c, O D_ 

~-+ 

a o 

w o 

o o o 

~ 

° 7:3 

D 

p 

^ c~C 

~ 

~ 

U 

~ 

~ 

~ ~ -~ 

U N 

v 

C ~ ~ ~ ~ Z X >, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y c~~ U v o ~ ~ ~ s 

cd cd U +-. 

N c p~ 

~ ~ 

N 

~ oO 

N ~ ~ ;+ 

~ 

v C> z 

N x ~. N N U U 

~ 

b 

c~ 

-d 

c~ 

-d .-, C~ 

~ 

d 

c~ 

i, 

~ 

~, 

N 

~s ~ ~ 

~ N ~ 

b!) r• ~ ttA ~ .° ~ 

_Q 

r .~' ~ 

D 

tip O ~ ~ ~ N ~ 

~ b o 

N C DD N 

~ U ~'. .

cn 

CL 

v~ 

i]. fL > 

va cn :~ 

a) ~ O ~ "C1 x, LS ~ L3 

t~. 

cn 

~ t7 ~ O 

s Q? 

c' Od O O X r. :t a~ N c~S c~a ^n) r~ci ~cY, u ~ ~ ~ +~- ~ ~ O O ~~ O~ 

z z O Z: O c. R, ~ p-, w w w' ~ v~ rr) ~n tn cn rn 

~ 

f~ 

en a~ ~~~.t 

C_7 

~ -4 

N 

~ Up 

~r _o o ~ 

;} 

~!~ ~r1 £/~ ~C~~ ~/^~ ~` 

~ 

U~ /~ U~ f~ U~ f~ o~ t~ QrT x•~^ on o ~ 

~ 1--~ l -

~ 

1~.!~ 

~-. f-

. f-~ 

/~N 

l--~ T \ \ 

n 

a.V i.•+ i—V Y+ !-'.-! ~ t// 

~~~ 

Vl ~/l ~J vJ VJ ~ }-~ 

~ _a--+ 

y ~ ~ 

y~ 

s-" ~ •-V-+ i.q~. 

Lq CCS ~ r.'n.. 

° 

~j 

~ 

~ 

~, 

cH 

° ~ `~ ~ ~ 

c~ 

~ ~ ~ p 

w ~ ' ~ 

`°~' 

c~ ~ v ~ ~ or~ -~ 

S4 ~ 

~ ~ 

~ ~°' ~ =S ~ 

o -~ .,,,, Q. ° ~ 

r- ~ ~ ~ 

~ `n ~ a ~ ~ p U 

~ 

~ 

o 

+~ 

° 

N 

W 

O O 

~ :p cd RS 

~o ia cd 

'CS 

~ 

W N 

e~ 

~--~ 

N 

+~ 

N N 

rn 

~ i. 

~. a) 

+' 

~ 4-, 4-~ ~ 

r-, r-, t, ~ N N N a> 

U a~ ,, ~ ~ 

~ 

to c,.., 

° [ ~ 

~ ~ 

~ 

~ ~ 

~ 

`n 

a0> 

`'-` 

s

0. 

~ ~ ~ 

o. v' 

o A, 

~` u' ,., 

~ 

~ 

a 

-~ 

o 

`n "~ ND 

o 

o 't3 

~ 

_~ 

'-O 

v cd rn v cd rn ~ 

U U 

~ ~ 

D rJ V 

~ ~ ~ ~ 

Q Q Q p 

O ~ -

0 

• ~ p~j r~.~i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ 

c0 ~ c0 cw ~ Q c° ~ a. R. ° at 

~ N~D 

[.~~ ~ ,--~ ~ ~✓ N U~t W U~+ w .n ~' , : ~ 

O o,n N 

0 

~ ~ 

~ 

0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 

U U U U ~ Q F-I H O~ ~r ~ W W •r~i `H C1O C.:D Z=II Hi H t-~-d ~-e • ~ •`~•~` 1-~-t ~.•~-~ .-~i ~ ~ 

C_D 

C7 

a 

0 ~n 

~ 

~ 

~ U) 

H 

LO 

SD Q 

cE 

~ 

P. 19 
XNLET A.ND OUTLET 

SOURCE TESTING REPORT 

ON THE T~JNNEL KILN SCRUBBER 

HANLEY PLANT 

GLEN-GERY CORPORATION 

SUMMERVILLE, PENNSY-LVANYA 

Testing Dates: April 26 and 27, 2005 

Prepared for: 

Gien-C'xery Corporation 

Route 6I, 423 S. Pottsville i'ike 

P.Q. Box 340 

Shoemakersville, Pen,nsylvania 1 9555-0340 

Prepared by: 

Air/Cornpliance Consultants, Xnc. 

1050 WilJ.iam Pitt Way 

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15238 

412-826-3636 

PA I,ab Registration #: 02-742 

Pzoject No. 05-083 

P. 21 
SOURCE TES`I` REPORT STATEMEN'f 

T'n?s statement signed by the on--site supervisoz -of the test team and tl-ie source 

owner/operator certifes that. "to-the best of their knowledge"-tbe soturce test teport has 

been checked for completeness, an.d that the results presented are accurate, ez -ror-free, 

legible, and representative of the actual ez -nissions measured during testing. 

James F. Phillippi 

Senior Project Manager 

On-Site Supervisor of the Test Teanz 

Air/Compliance Consultants, Inc. 

TZobert Stewart 

f;nvironxnental Ma.nager 

Source Owner/Operator 

Clen-Cery Corporation 

P. 2 2 
R E C E I V E D APR 2. 5 2095.- : , 

'~ ~ ~ 1~ ~.. _ ~ ~ • .~ ~ ~~; 

~ ~~ E ""• . t ~~ ~ ~ ,~ ~. 

. ~. 

Pennsy'ivania Department of Fnvic -onmental Protecfion 

- - . Racliel Carson State Offce Buildin Dto, 

Bureau of Alr Quality 

Post-O-ffice Box 8468 

Haz- risburb, Pennsyivania 17105 -- 8468 

Aprill 7, 2005 

Mr. Robert Stewart 

Glen-Gery Corporation 

423 S. PottsviIle 

P.O. Box 340 

Shoemakersville, PA 19555 

1-1 r"M 

~~ ~`ti _ _.t: t~ }~j l,j 1. . _~ (•~i'

. 

Dear Mr. Stewart: 

Qn March 23, 2005, the Department x'eceived a procedural submission for hydrogent chlor7;de and 

hydrogen fluorade (EPA method 26A), sulfur dioxide and sulfuric acid misfi (EPA xnethod 8), NitTogen 

Ox•ide (EPA method 7E), and Particulate (EPA rnethod 5) on the scrubber inlet and outlet at Glen-Gery 

Corporation in Summerville Borough, Jefferson County. Testing will be conducted to demonstrate 

compliance with the conditions of Plan Approval No. TV-33-00055. `i'he test protocol is unacceptable 

to the Department untess the following conditions are xnet: 

oHCl/HE, and SO,tremoval eff cienczes as well as outlet mass eznission rates sllould be 

reported in lbs./lu'. 

~ Testing shall be perforined while the kiln is operating at the maximurn production rate and 

while using raw n-iatezials that contain the highest concentTations of fluorine, chlorine, and 

sulfur fihat wi11 be used in the kiln. 

~ Zn accordance with the Souxce Testing Manual section 2.$ (rev. 33) sampling trains shall 

achieve a collection efficiency of >_95°/fl. Collection efhciency for EPA Method 26A (HCL) 

can be determine by analyzing the two impingers containing acidic solutions separately. This 

is done to ensure that there is no break through from the second impinger. 

~ The final test report must include at least one complete ernission calculation for pollutant 

tested. This calculation actually irnplements stack test data in equations (and not just 

calcuiation fonnulas) to verify test result accuracy 

~ All required audit samples must be ordered at least tliirty (30) days prior to the test date.. Please 

submit the written r-equest to: 

An tqua lOpportunity Employct Gvww.dep.state.pa_us i'rinied on Recycted Paper 

P. 2 3 
- 2 - Apri17, 2-005 

Mr. Bryon Richwine 

fiureau of Air Quarity 

~ ivision of Source Testing and Monitoi-ing 

Quality Assurance Unit 

400 IV.larket St_, RCSUB (12 Ehfloor) 

Harrisburg, PA 17105-8468 

Biyon Richwine of our Quality Assurance Unit must be notified of the results by teleplaone (717- 

787-9483) and the iresults included in the test report_ 

0 Cotttact Dave Bubbenrnoyer (814-723-3273) regarding process operation during test. 

Please inform Dave Bubberarnoye7r of our Northwest Regional Office and me at least two 

weeks prior-to test of the ach,ial date and time of test_ 

Fiiial acceptance ofthe test repUrt wiil be contingent upon fulfilling the aforementioned conditions 

and all applicable i-equiz-ements specified in Title 25,Chapter 139 of' the PA Code; Pla.n Approval No 

TV--33-00055; and the Department's Source Testing_Iylanual (Revision 3.3, November 2000). If 

there are any questions regarding this matter, please contact :ne at your convenience_ 

Sincerely, 

c

.~`--_ ~ 

Rajdeep Singh Bhangu 

Source Testing Section 

Division of'Source Testing and 1Vlonitoring 

cc. r _ Jaanes Phillippi 

Air/Corxipliance Consultants, Tnc. 

1050 William Pitt Way 

Pittsburgh, PA 15238 

bcc: Red Uata File, Glen-Gery Corporation, Surnmervxlle Borough, Jeffei -son County 

Dave Bubbenmoyer-, Northwest Regional 

Reading File, Source Testing 

TRB:R.SB:rsb 

P 24 
y~ 

i0 ,~~~/Compliance 

consuffunts, Inc. 

Ivlarch 1 b, 2005 

Mr. IZajdeep Bhangu 

PADEP, Bureau of Air Qirality Souz -ce Testing Section 

Rachel Carson Siate Office Building 

PC_) Box 8468 

Harrisbu.rg, Petunsylvania 17105-8468 

RL: Submit-tal of Test Protocol 

Dear Mr. Bhangu: 

P1-oject Nuwnber 0.5-483 

AirfCompliance Consultants, rnc- (ACC1) will be contr -acted by Glen-Gery Corporation to 

conduct testing ozz the inlet and outlet of the wet scrubber at their I4anley Plant in Sumn -rerville, 

Pennsylvania_ The iest will follow the previous submitted.lVlarch 8, 2003 Protocol (attached) 

tivith the following revised contact inforrn.ation: 

Testin 

Jarnes Phillippi 

AirlCornpliance Consultants, Inc1050 VVilliam Pitt Way 

Pittsburgh, PA 15238 

412-826-3636 — Plzone 

412-826-364(} — Fax 

,jphiili@air-comp_corn 

Laboratoiry 

Nancy Kotsko 

Air Quality Servzces 

4527 Clairton Boulevard 

Pittsburgh, PA. 15236 

412-881-5630 — Phone 

412-881-7925 — Fax 

PA Lab No.: 02-7I 1 

'llent 

R.obert Stewart 

(31en-Gery Corporation 

423 S. Potfsville, Box 340 

Sboemakersville, PA 19.555 

610-562-2084 — Fax 

610-562-3076 — P}ione 

bstewart@glcngerybrick.com 

The conditions presented in your 1Vlarch 26, 2003 approval letter (atfaclied) will also be followedUzlder sepaz•ate lettei-, audit saniples wiil be requested f~om Iv.lr, Bryon Richwine.. 

Please call us at (412) 826-3636 if you have any questions. 

Sincerely, 

AIR/C:OMPL. ~.~fJ-VCE CO1ITSZI'LTANT5`, INC.: 

, 

7~P~ 

ames E_ Phillippi 

Seruor Project Manager 

.3EP/RNT-:s1.I 

Enclosures 

cc: Ivlr. Robert Stewart, Glen-very Corporation 

ZNFt°r2oJC;C11Glen•Geiy Br;cklSummervilielLO7 L(r Pratocai RajdecP BhanQu dDc 

~ ~ 

Robert N. Frey 

Vice President 

l OS0 Wifliam Pitt tiYay 

Pitfsburgh, P'A 15238 

412-826-3636 

412-876-3640 (ax 

P_ 25 
TEST 1VEt 'I'HOD CERTIFICA'I`I4N 

GIen-Gery Cniporation and Aiz/Coznpliance Consultants, Znc. have conducted a review of the 

state and iederal regulations which apply to each source at Glen-Gery Corporation, in order to 

develop the test methods descr-ibed in fllis protocol_ We certify, to the best of our k.aozvledge, 

that the test methods that have been incorpor -ated into the atiached protocol meet the testing 

rertuiremenEs of' the applicable regulations. 

Inlet and OutIet Wet Scrubber 

Test Protocol 

Suxnmervilie Plant 

Glen-Gery Corporation 

.A.CCI Project No. 05-083 

,~.~ ~ ~ . •~ 

Jarrz.es E. Phffl}ippi 

Senior Rzojeot Manager 

AixlCorrrplianc6 Consultants, Tnc. 

tewast 

Envirot.menfal Manager 

fxlerx-~'rery Corporadon 

Z_1APR0jr--CT1G1cn-Gcry Brick\05-0$3 SummcrviilelSignoffPsgc Aor Proiocol.doc 

P. 26 
~ ~ 1 ■ ■ 

t ~ 

1 :. ~ ~,:~✓ %s• ~ ~, ~. ~~ • ~t' • ~ ~~ ~„~ 

"" ~'~''B~ 'y~~~n ?~ r `•r.• - 

• ~" s~.

l``

~ ~.ri. . :a• A ro..• 

! • . , .,., . 

'r-384 P 00 3 103 7 F-2aG 

~.-~~• ~Y

~~~...f-v~•.-.r~~ l u _ r~i~'1~M= 

3131 Uisney S~L-

+

~ce1..t~ 

~'ita.c"iun.aLi.rOhi'ti 4$2,DR 

(513) 35I-6200 

(513) 35I-d•D7X 

_ _ . --~ai~ site~vtv+~'.~bd tcclxxzi.c.cozu 

? ~t`'YRSSION ITSTPRaT4COL 

DBT",~~'-A-TION flF PARTICULATE AATITER, 

SUf YURDIOXIDE,, MDR0 C-FN CEU- ORML AND 

_ MRO G-tK Z`L'U0EM E, livZM SIONS AT THE 

IN-11,X AND OTJTlxtT OV TFM WET SCRUB13E.R, 

fx7UN- ''I~Y CORJ'OP`4.AUON 

YIAN3E,EY PLANT 

SMMMIMLL,E, PA. 

OXcxt Gery2'cojectC`,00rclsa,af.a5c: 

Enviroumental. Msn ager 

M ailing Addxess' 

P_O_ Bos 3 ~i0 

0haf:ma1cus-d11e, PA 195 ~ 5 

Z`elepbone 

(6I0) 562-3(}76 

Plant Address: 

Route 2$ 

Summerville, PA, 1586"066 

SubmzftE-,d byz 

KB)D r1` o' cBmC, 1ac. 

Cz-a.ig R, JJones 

Vice President 

JoT~ T-ur p-1457 

Karcb. S, 2003 

Q. 27 
Fe(?O- T-384 P 004I037 F-2'S 

To -if-he best o~ Tt2.3► knowledgasti~e sfaGe dnd federczl r ~ef;~t7~itzorts, opet'aiit2g 

perrnit61or plan dpprovals applicable tcs eceA sozr.rce oT conti-oi dEvice ki be tested 

hccvt been reviewed and that aZl tesHng reguiremenes therezn 1`caue been incorporated inio the iest plan_ 

cxl ai; R,Jones RobextSt~.-cx-[: 

Vice pze6dmt En.v'zronmental Max3agex 

1£ED `FECILNSCyIitl'{I Gle.r~ -Gery C;ozpox aticcn 

P. 28 
li~41'- ~0-~~ FRo}f- T-3B4 p 905/03i F-25E 

_ ... . . _ . . 1.0 -17MOD27C~'.~~I1 

...... 

The objeedve af the tasf program is bo detexzoune coampliaz ~ eo 'Wifh X'la.tl ~pproval NurYtber 

33 t?55~ Bznzssion tests are tobe cozicl -xcted fQr paz -Eculate xnaeex- (PM), zt.ztrogen. o:ddes (NOx) stil- 

,qLr cto4de (SQ,2), su].Fuuic aci.d mist (H,90,), hyc.'rogen chIoride (73CI) and ;ydrogca fluoriae ~

CHF1- Emzssion samples ar'e to be collected usx7rg USEPA IvZethods 7, 2, 3, A 6, 'fE, 8 ancd 26A The 

fi.r~ program wffl cake place duringthe weel;. of Apffl 14;2003_ IMI} 'pECRNI:C Nvzll condml; the 

Aeld tests and analgLe the particular,e sahiples. DataClxexn Laboremries wiu perforIn tb-- anelysis 

for S02, ILSO„ 73C`l and HFTt,S`nNG Ct?MLPANYCON£ACT LA.730RAT0RY CON'I'ACT 

DMORMATION IlT, OR€YfA.TwN 

KED TBCIRN'IC IIaLaChem Laborataries 

3131 Dismey Stzeet 4388 Ex]endele--7Vlilfoxc.d Road. 

Cinci=ati, OOH 45209 Cinci.mata, OH 45262 

(513) 351: 62a0 ( 5I3) 73M336 

Craig Jorces Ed Slic~:. 

Yice Presictem Leb Kanager 

Peansylvania Repisfz'atzorz f68 -1320 

2.0 PXtO CE,SS jgff ORMA 7-Y01V 

GZeti CTety Corporatzon o.prrates atz=el ki.In frs ramizufacE-,zre arclzitecturat brzck• The 

P[az?. approva7• crumbryx for s~us so'nxce is 33-4S5.A, i-gsued ort aVlay 1, 2002. TIae gas-nred Isilu ha9 a 

capacitf of 60 NfN1 BEP)year (26_62 tonslb.our), T4e aii pollation coxztroI. dev:ice (APCD) f-ox Lbe 

IsiIa is a Cateuary Grid Scnibber usi.azg magneszum hydz -oxzde Ma(011)_- as th-- scrubba-no I.iguor, 

The scz-abber vras desigrzed and installed. by CECO FiltGrs- The vnit Las a capacit-7 of 45,600 a.cFm 

at d50`7'_ A. process Raw dzagxam is iucluded ixt ~iguxe 2_1_ 

The~ fblIowing process paxameters will ba recarded durTrrtg fhe tesfs by Olen-Cer;}r aurl,/o:r 

MO pex'soxz-o.el tb vezdCy tbAthe tesf.s axe cortdttcted at fhe rated capacity -azzd fbe maximixrn zzorMal opex:abing coxidit7ons: 

I_ lOn thxoughput ~ ~~(• ~if:G~t. ~ r~ {~nc~ ~~~" ~`~5~_ 

~ 2_ Serubber liquzdpJ3 ~~,~-7 Ia,~t'~efr~ 

3_ Scmbber pz'essux•e drop 

4. Sexubber lZquzd ffow x-afie /' 5 P .yl) I 

5. (~hemic21 add.itzon xate ( 6 

nq~~~ 

~ 
FP,DIh 

L?y 

~a n. 

d 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

a 

~ 

~ 

~ 

R 

t3 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

o~ 

cS a 

0 

~ 

~-t 

~ 

N 

os. 

~ 

~=t 

P_ 30 
a a 

~ 

G 

U 

~ 

tw 

c.r 

os ~ 

c 

~ 

m 

F ~ 

v G~ 

~ (D C) 

~ 

a, ~ c~ 

o 

> ~ 

•~ r 

~r 

(3) (11 ~ 

 CD 

m 

C~ m 

~ 

x Pr' Y 

~ o ~ 

~... q? C'a •

> 

U 

,:I 

CG 

IM 

~ 

1-. ~ 

~ 

~ 

A 

nj 

R 

ca 

4 

CS 

~ 

~ 

m 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

a 

u 

5 

0 

~ 

~ 

~ 

H 

1,m_.20-03 09:16 FP1QI;- T--384 P 001/037 F-25fi 

~ 

O 

.

CC? 

c~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

■ 1 

m ~ 

cr m 

.:,. 

v ~ O 

~ ~ m 

~ 

~ ..~ 

Cl 

a i° p 

-a ti ~ ~s 

rj~ 

M ~ c3 Fi .9 

(D F•. ,D C~ 

cf ~ CC) ~ 

~ _ 

u 

~ 

P:t o 0~~ 

W ~ P2 ~ 

-~ 

CD 

~ !::4 ~ 

U7 T, 

CTI _ 

~ 

m ~ 

~ ~■ -~ 

ta 

~ G'T GS u 

U 

~ 

a m •— ~ 

~~~~ 

~ 

'JC a 

~ 

~ 

a) 

tJ ~' 

a ~ 

m ~ 

-C3 

u ~ 

~ 

N .~ 

.IC)P ~ 

~ I-j 

LO 

~ :1 

m ~ 

EEI 

,' 0 

," 

b ~ 

rv~ 

Eq-~ 

ri 

.• rc m is, 

cl ~ 

C', 

r 

-~ a 

d 

 U:; ~ 

r ~ ~ 

o r- 

•~ ,~ ~ 

m 

~ o 

g~ m ^' u 

=-t U~~ ~ 

ca U ~ 

di • 

~ ~ ~ 

~' 

~ 

'1:4 trr 

'~ ~ 

.,.7 •~ 

O ~ O 

N ~ CO 

~ co 

,a, 

^ ~ 

w.3 ~ ~ YJ 

•1"'S 

r_) 

U 

O 

c~ • o.~ ~ 

`R G] ~ 

ta 

s.cl'~d a ~7 ^_ 

~ 

~ 

O P4 

P" tn ~ ta 

,~ •~ ~ Pi 

a) 

Q - p ~ •~~~ ~ 

.~ C 

-rj 'Ci 

~ 

~ °7 

~

~ ~ ~ ;l 4 

~ cn ~•~ ,o ~ ~ 

~~~p~~ 

cr m s + -15 

sa, C] ~ ~ ~ r F• 

~ Q•- ~ `°°' ~~ 

~ ~ ~ o ~ 

g~~~~~~. L , 2 G GJ 

EC 

C3 •"^ =U F2 

~~ 4S U al 

~ -2 

tn 

m~ ~ 

ct'r-+ ~` U •~ [7 ['"{. R~ ~ c° N 

ra 

gb

~ 

•~~ , m ~ .-

`_`

} -v CG ._ 

7~ 

 ~

~ C~ r ~~ o cf 

r h•~ ~

IIi U ~ 

4 

' •a ~ 5- ~ .~ 

~ ~~~ ~~•i ~ 

p U tD ~ L`) 

F` 

P~ 

C3 u >;~ 

~ 9 ~ ~a 

 5 ~ 

o~^ ~ :J~ ~ 

.n ~ ~ o■ ~ 

aso 

Y, 

~~ z ~ 

~ aR .~ ~ C-1 81 ~' 

0 

a,a 

~ 

~ . ,.{ Er7 

o ~ j 

•~ O ~ 

-d p cb ~. 

O u v7 L~ O t3 y ti 

~ ~ ~ ~ .~J L ~ ~ 

~ t .,~" 

o ti Cj 

~ ~ ~ 

^~ ~ ^~ 

O Grzz 

•~ _ ■ y t a 

~ ~ 

S. Ja 

0 

~-i 

~`' 

',.,~ G J. 

 ~ ~ O v~ 

~ ~ ~ m _ ~. p a rr 

u~~~Y U ' ~ 

1(~{~s ~~./ i~ C`+ Y-.' ~ }~~ ~y 

p ~ :•. 

u 

~ ~ C 

p 

~ ._ 

U~ •C 

 ~ ~ 

Q 4 (w 

~ ~ 

i_ -y.i ri \'^ 0 

~~'tR 

~1 

~ ~ ~ 

~ 

I~ ~ 

8.~ ~_ 

~ -~ ■ ~ ~ ~ t 

F` ~ ~ ~ 

— 

~ ,~ 4; vx ti+ ~ y ~ = c~ `3 r: ~ 

R' ~1 ~ fi~-~ ~ R ` ~ '~ ~ ~'` ~i c, ~ R ~.g !: 

(1 

~ 

~` ~ 

~` e Q J ` ~, ~ ~ [~ ~ 

~ ~ o ~' ~ •ua ~~ y ~ ~ ~^ ~ ~ 

~-~~~c~~~~~ 

~ C~l ; p 

c~'~-4 o~q~,~ ~~•5 Q-~ 

~ ~ rj 

4~ d7 I P" ~ 

~ 

-ts 

J 

U~t 

m 0 ~ 

~ 

~ tb N 

P-r ~~ A;5'- 

ol 

`Cl ~ 

V 

~ 

~ 

~ ^L[} 

0 

~ 

:--~ ~ 

~ 

ct 

Q? 

~ 

Q

~ 

...tw 

1P. 
T--3m P GO8I03Y t=-256 

;/~4Y...20-D3 09:16 FROi;- 

-r~~ a ~' ° c' ~i- . ' ~ n Q ° ~Z-' d ~i~,-°~ ~ •~~~d~ ~~~~.~ ~~ 

.U - sacsct ~ ta 

m o ac ai cw ¢ 

c~ ~ -~I ~ ~ °S ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ° v c E ~+ ~ 

p~j ~ ~ 

~ ~ ~ ° 

;• ~ ~ o ~ f3 -~ ~ a ~' .y+ ~ o r r- .r3 c~ . ~ Pt o14 a ~ [r.t t'' o - ~v ~ F ra P4 -Q "_' c~ 

~ ~ ~ ,; ~ o 

zo ~ ~a c•r 

o u1 ~ .rs R.~ ~ —, C ~ mar . _G .~i ~ zf ~ _a c~ ~p p o 

4 m O0 ~ a 

~ d ~ ~ ~'~ ,. P. ~ fc', ~ ^ L~~ r. ~ ~ a~~~`. ~_~ aS. ~ a~,~ ~ 

as _ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ a cu ~ v ~c~ O a... a 

to ~ ?y ~ ca s~ Z cs ~ ~ ~ ~.b y 

a ='d ~'_~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~

=d

-C~ @ o 

o. c o _c r~ ~~j ~ a~3 ~ °; ~ aC CA ~~ `~ ~ a~ ~' c.~ E+ ~ ~ a'~ 

~ ~ ,GY i-""' 

~ A3 ?'~ a7 ~Cy ~ .-~ ~ + .:-t -~ ~ ~ _~ „ t.'t ,L `r K ~ ~ 

`~ ~ m .~ ~ ~ "`3 y ~ •3 ~ ~ ^_. s ~ _ 'r~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S • -~ ~r ~* t/2 R,.n~ _t~ 

~ ~ 

m a ~,r~~ rF~ °'~ ~~~p F~`~ ~~ ?.as ~`~cd.~ w o `n m 

~ '~~~ ~~'j Q~ ar ~~ S .R~~ ~~ ~^ ~~~~~ 

~ L7 -.LY'~ Q~ +~ ~ 

' . ,~ al "L7 Q ~ `r 6) CS N °'i ^

~ ~ 

~ ~ cs ~ `F*` -l7 ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ h rn zt° ~ ri ~ 

a' o ° ~ °~ ro .~ ~ ~, 

p~t p [~ = ' 

~ " ~ r- ~ z, _' + r3 t3 ~ - m 

~ "7 c ~ 'v .. a ~~~ Q 5~ ~, ° .'~ ~ ai ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ m .~ "' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rrs ~ -cS ~ ~ 

~ Pi U ~ $ ¢,`° 700 ~~ ti~ a,~ ~1 ~ 

~ ~ U.°~ m ~' o U ~ ti E ^ vs n~ p ~v ~ ~ o 

~ 3 

N 

~ p ~ u ~ ~ 7 "cpt o ~ ^^ L{ ~d-~p+~~~'_~

` ~ . W -4*3 7+ ~ a3 ~ p~ -,-+ G Li "' L~ 3~D 13 •Sa p~ J C

a ~ ~ ~ u o a -[ r~ O ~' ° ~ ~ w o ~' ~ J={ ~ 

a m ~ ° ax ~ w~.~' S c)~ ~ ~ ,pc~ ~, 

~F` y 

co ~ ~ ~~D~ CD ~ ' ~ C} bb ~' ~ a> ~ ~~~`' ~ d ~ a.s~ ~ ~ 

~ z , ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ m o o u ~ C ~ r~ °' ~ ~ '~ 

a ~ rs ~ m`"' ~~ co ~ r~ e+ .-. ~~ ~ a o d r, a~ r- ~ ° H tn ca ~ sd- 

 a 

~~A 't n¢ `c~ p c3 `~ Z: Ui ~` . ~ o aT cs ~~~ R. ~ i. ~ r ~~y ~ 

G~ _Otl ~ -•~ ~q••t -~ msi Cl _Ct 

L.

2E4 ~ @ v ..m ~ 

p v ~ ~©~-Q ~~-y '~ —, ~• p 

cff 

U - Q U O Y- ~ ~~`"~ ~ ~' ~ ~ •~ 

~ U tl ai ~ r .~ s• • ~ ~[~ p ~ ~ m ~ ~ ,'' r'` ~ 

p ~ y ~ GS ~ Gl O 93 -~.i ~ p c) ~ ~ ~ G ~ ~..~ ~ ~ .Q rrSr* .~u G~ ~ 

"'.~.-. G p 

m

m~ m°o En 3 ~ "" nf3 °7~' H~~ 

~ ~ O~ -` a'* ~.~ ~~~ cs~,:w~~ 

rdo;;

~rt °"~ Q 

Q, r ~~ [~ •~ c~ r, a' ~ 

~ U ~~~ ~ Q ~ r1 ° ~ © F o p m' 3 ~ t• c4 C ~ a ox n ° ~t' na ~~ o .~ Q, ' ~ ~ ~ f~s u ~t ... ~ ~ ~ *~7 ~ -~ a) ~ 

~ ~'~' ~ U °~ .dr m o ~ s~' ° ~ $ m '~~ ~ ~~ ..a U'~4~ os 

~ _~ ~. a 

o~~~'~ v o -r~ J• ~ n* z ag~ ~ ~~~ m -~ ,~c~~ ao 

c°„N~ v.t~ c~i ~ "~~c~v c~ ~O~ d o n~ "-~~^~-~ .~ c -+ ~ Ei ~~ -.. 

~ v o ~ ~ o ~ _°m r' ~~ Fs P e~ o ~ ~ ~ '~.~ ~ art '

2 

nf ~~ ~ r~ 'f5 C` r, :~ e3 ~. p~ j

 ~ ~ ~ s ~`~o~ ce P. ` 7S t 13 

4} CS ~+ ~ c, ~~ L3 ~~ CS p 

~ G ~ ~ %.~ ^ ~ u .. ~ 

° ~ a " ~ CO 4 0 ~ ~ ~~ ~ 

~ ~ 

° ~Va ~ 

O ~ " o ~ ~ a . '~ f~ 

~~m~+ ~ Eca ~ `Q'' ,~~ -~'~j a°?~x~ ~

a

~c7.y ~.~~ a C ~ ~ ~ "~ J +•~ Q ~ y J] ~ '~ 

A a ~~~ -

~

c

 Q ~ "~ fJ_ O.. P~ Cl,2 a1 ~ T--~ ~ ~ ~ L7 .r3 3 r ~ Cl C'~~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ¢q 23 .~ ~ " cS 

~ 

a,~°:~ ~ 

Cfl 

~.._, •~ 71 

_~ ty 

ay r 

~ J 

Q ~ 

Ls _cu 

U~ Qc3 

P. 32 
T-384 p D09/937' F--256 

I&-20-03 09:I7 FftpM.. 

tEl 

d a " c, rl ~ "-cs c W 

n ~ ~.~~ 

~rT`c ri cLY 

as m c., ~ i T3 ~ d m uY u3 

'Ct ~ m 0 072

~ 

 to 

`t -7 ~ 

C:;~~~ 

c 

~ - G cs ~ ~ d 

O ~ '~ 

~ ul 

m Rf~ .• 

0 

r~ 

ntD 

m ~ ~` ^4.y J ~ 

 ' ~ O Qf O . 4 •• --t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a:<3 

~ ~ ~ 

ro 

i 

~ ` rn C 

~.~ Q ^' .~ m ' 

tu 

~ca G ~ P4f~ 

L7 .c-t ~ "'~ •3~ ~ '-` ~ i..t 

rS 'II ~ c~ 

a CS~~ ~ as 

Lg 

03 Q el 

CF ~ - ~ (~ ~ ~ 

~ ~ U ~~G ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ 

a~ ~ Q b G

ri! 

~ 

u _Ef a 

~ ~ ~ 

Q ~ ~ ~~,~~~ ~ 

Qgj 

2~ 

.~- ,n }~ ~ -•~ os 

o

i-~ ~ C _ -o 0 

a~~ L'~ a m ~ t7 d ~ (~ ba~o~ ~ ~a 

V ~ 

~ " Q 

~ I U. G`3 Q ~ 

~ 

`caid c 

r ci m Pi . ~j ~ 

~

:a ~q a ~ 

~ 4.) d a 

m 76 G ~ QS c.~'7 G 

ca 9 -0 

~ _~~•• .L T c~s 

~ as ~C ~ ~* ~ .t2 W r~ ~ ~ c3 aF ai 

a 

'"' ~ r~ o •o o 

rtt '_Q d 

p~ ~ cD , d w 

-a i ~ U ~ Q , a c- ~ _ 

~ t~ O '.o ~ 

~ 

4..., N N 

t 4 

v{ 

~ 

LL 

~ '•~ L ~ ~ 

~_ 

C/:t ~ .~ •+~,.. 

~ 

~ 

P. 33 
rligure 3_1 Strabber outlet stacic sxte defazl 

StaGk 1D at 

Sampiir?g Slto Cross 

Section - 36" 

Traverz~ e 

Point 

Location From inside 

of Ssactc WaJI 

3 4 r' 

S ( _V 

?- 

9 329' 

37_3' 

12 39_2" 

TRAVERSE POIN7 L.00A3- ION 

20-D3 D9:17 I:RDId- T-384 P o1G/03T r• -256 

P. 34 
QS;IT Fr.OiAT-?84 P 0I1f037 F-M 

LU 

N 0 

~ 

ui 

~ 

0 

~ 

N• ~ 

q tD 

C\i 

r 

c_ m 

a 

.a 

~ 

U 

~ 

~ 

E n= 

m 

IF~ 

Co ~- a m 'cn cv 

CV a3 t? 0 

a 

G 

p 

2 

a ~ 

~ 

t-- cq c-s ta cQ 

Lm 

W 

~ 

~ 

L. 

~ 

c 

0 

ttS 

v 

0 

~ 

~ 

C 

D 

Q 

ai 

V-1 

m 

> 

~ 

~ 

r--c 

4) 

ru 

~ 

•~, 

~Q 

~i..i 

~ 

Y 

i~ 

~ 

~ .~ 

r"1 

...J 

~ 

H 

U 

~ 

N' 

~ 

~ 

C-1 

~ 

~ 

~ =t 

~ b 

m— U 

© ~ b EECLI 

~ 1I1 Li3 

V 

P. 35 
Ai~' c~c~~ l aance 

March 22, 2005 

Mr. Bz-yon Richwine 

Bureau of Air Quality 

Division of Source Testing and Moiiitoring 

Quality Assuraiace Unit 

400 Maz'ket St., RCSC3B (12` hfloor) 

Harzisburg, Pennsylvania 17105-8468 

R.e: Request for Atidit Sanzpies 

Dcai-lv1r. ~ichwine: 

Pr-oject No. 0.5-083 

We aze planning fo conduct testing for the Glen.-Gery Coi-poratioii.. Testing will be conducted at. 

tl-Le Sun-unerville, Pennsyivanaa an A.pril 25, 2005_ A11 fiesting will be connpleted in accord.ance 

witli Uriited States Enviromn.ental Protection Agency (USEPA) Methods 8 and 26A. We are 

hereby requesting one USEPA Method 8 and one 1vlethod 26A Audit Samples for our tests. 

Attached please f~ nd an Audit Sa.nlple R.equest form.. 

Sincez-ely, 

Ai:r/Compliance Cojrstcl,ffflits, Itzc_ 

, 

, t , 

~'x~'

/obert

r 

.~anles E. Phillippi N. Frey 

Senzor Pro,ject Manager Vice President 

cc: Mz. I3ob Stewart, Glen-Gery Corporation 

Atach.ment 

105U Wiiliom Pin Wny 

Pillsburgh, PA 15238 

412-826-3636 

412-826-3640 fax 

21MPRO3FCT1G1en-Gery ©rickl05-033 5urnmerviliek.r+u6il 5arsple Request doc 

P. 36 
Audit Request Number: 

(To be compieted by EPA) 

AudEt Sarnple Requesf FGrtn 

1. Name of Source C?wnerlC)perator 

GTer;-Gery Corporation, -Bob -Sfewart - 

Address: Street Route 61, 423 S_ Pottsville Pike, P.O. Box 340 

City Shoemakersville State Pennsylvania Zip 

T eEephone 61 J-562-3076 e-MaiE unknown 

2.. List of requested audit samples: 

19555 

Number of 

Sarn les Sam le Method 

Target 

Concentration Date Needed Test Date 

.1 8 lovv-rr2id A ril 22, 2005 April25, 2005 

7 26A low-mid April 22, 2005 A ri125, 2005 

3. Shipping address if different from above; 

Company Ait'fCornpliance Consultants, Inc. 

Street 1050 tNilliarrr Pitt Way 

City Pittsburqh State PA Zip 15238 

Attention Jtm Phillippi Telephone No. 412-826-3636 

4. Test Site: Piani Narne Glen-Gery Corporation 

Address State Route 28 

Summerville Pennsylvania 15964 

5. Special Shipping Instructions: 

4p;c;ecVdu1"erco farrelf/Audit Sarrzpla Request farm-pa 3117/2005 

P_ 37 
? w: 

~~~•_ ~ ..' ' g ~~ __ t~`x ~'~ 

wwvr.erg.com 

April_ 18, 2005 

Bz-yon Richwine 

PA Dept. of Environruental Protection, Bureau of Air Quality 

1"2 th Fioor RCS0B, 400 Market Street 

Harrisburg, ]PA 17101 

(717) 787-9483 

Dear Mr. Richwine: 

Fastern Research Group (ERG) has been directed by the U.S. EPA to provide you with two 

ampules of audit material for a Method 08 SO ZI iV,iethod 08 SulfrYric acfd mist audit: M08-2264-01. 

These samples are for an audit at Glen -Gery Coz-p. in Shoemakervidle, PA and are being sent directly to 

Jarnes PhYllippi of AirlCompliance Consultants, Znc in Pittsburgh, PA, pez your autornated datalbase 

request. 

1Vlethod 08 SO2 

z- equest 1VZ08-2264-01: -• one each S02audit sample; Sample No. G , 0280 

Metlaod 08 Sulfuric acid xnist 

request iYZ08-2264-01: - one each Sulfuric acid mist audit sample; Sample No. H- 0316 

Please note that each sample is shipped with an instTuction sheet and a data form for listing the 

analytical audit infonnation. All results are to be reported by the requestor to the internet autozn.atecl 

computerized database. 

You are urged to instruct the laboratory to analyze the audit sample along with the designated 

field samples. The audit sample should be analyzed as a routine field sampie according to the 

specifications of the Test Method and using the supplied instructions. The audit results are to be 

reported to you, the requestor in the urnits speciffied in the instructions. You then will use the 

automated database to enter the results into the SSA.P database, 

VVe would -like to thank you for your participation in the Stationazy Source Audit Program. Zf 

you have any questions concerning the audit, please contact either Ms. Judi McCartney (91 9) 468-7920 

or myself at (919) 468-7928. IVIy fax mumber is (919) 468-7803. 

Sincerely, 

:} 

~`•, , _t 

~•~__..~ .:'~ `__ ~-~s ---~.,,.~,_...., ~~-,__.~.. 

, 

Rick Lafleur 

cc: Shipped with audit sarnple 

1600 Perimeter Park, Morrisville, NC 27560-8421, Telephone: (919) 468-7800, (Office) Fax: (919) 468-7801, (Lab) Fax: (919) 468-7803 

- Arlington, VA - Atlanta, GA - Austin. TX • Boston, MA - Chantilly, VA - Chicaho, IL • Faii - field, CT 

I-;arrisburg, PA • Kansas City, KS - Lexington, MA - Nashua, NFi - Reseai - ch lriangle r,-irk., Morrisvilie, NC • Sacrarr;ento. CA~ P. 38 
im~-.. ?"aeZ's~='~s'• .`Y.~?-' -lr- ~-1; 

_yi{~~;:J' '3~~ t i `~'. ~_ •4 

`=y,.,, f-Y`Y'"

.: :a"j~•~ 9a :r. ~.~ y.,(:. 

www- erg.com 

April 18, 2005 

Requestor: Bryon Richwine 

PA Dept. of Environmental Protection,l3ureau of Air Quality 

12 th Floor RCSOB, 400 iVlarket Street 

Haz- risburg, PA 17101 

( 717) 787-9483 

Dear :Mr. Richwiaae: 

Eastern Research Group (ERG) has been directed by the U.S. EPA to provide you with the following 

audit lnaterial for.a Method 26A HCI audit; Numbers M26A-2264-02 and -2264-03. These audit'samples are 

for ar-, upcnining audit at Gleii-Gery Corp. ira Shoexnakerville, PA and are being sent di.rectly to -Tames 

Philiippi of Air/Compliance Consultants, Znc in Pittsburgh, PA per your automated database request. 

Please note: requests for Method 26A are now filled separately frofn requests for Method 26 and that 

there are NEW lnstructions associated with these saznples, ef£ective October 2003. 

1vit-tlinri 7 CN A 

recluest M26A-2264-02: 

- one Method 26A. HCI sarnple; Sample No. M- 1944 

request 1\426A.-2264-03: 

- one Method 26A 1-iCI sample; Sample No. iYl - 1761 

Please note that each sample is individually labeled and shipped with an instruction sheet with the foxznat 

for reportiifg the laboratory audit results. All results are to be reported to the inteniet automated computerized 

database. 

You are urged to instruct the laboratory to analyze the audit samples along with the designated field 

samples. "fhe audit sample should be analyzed as a routine freld sample according to the specifications of the Test 

Method and using the supplied instructions. The audit results are to be reported to you, the requ.estor, by the 

analyst, using the Repoi-ting, Form, in the units specified in the instructions. 'L'ou then will use the autornated 

database to enter the results into the SSAP database. 

We would like to thank you for your participation in the Stationary Source Audit Program. If you have 

any questions regarding the samples, please contact either Judi McCartney at (919) 468-7920 or myself at (919) 

468-7928. My fax number is (919) 468-7803. 

Sineerely, 

r. 

s ti 5 

t [ ~ 

. _ ~..~. _ ,....,, ~....,._.. 

Rick Lafleur 

cc: sent with audi.t sarnple 

1600 Perimeter Park, Morrisville, NC 27560-8421, Telephone: (919) 168-7800. (Office) Fax: (919) 168-7801, (Lab) Fax: (919) 468-7803 

^ Arlington, VA - Atlanta, GA - Austin, TX - Boston, MA • Chantilly, VA • Chicago, IL • Fairfield, CT 

- f-larrisburg, PA - Kansas City, KS • I.-exington, MA - Nashua. NH • Reseai - ch Triangle Park, P'lorrisville, NC - Sacramento, CA 

r_. _t -_.._.... C ~ „.. ~ ....,... . U::.,,,,,-I ,.n Rnr_lo.i A,n..r P. 39