alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 24, 2015

No. 04-15-00457-CV

IN RE E.K.C.,

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-PA-02397

Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is GRANTED. Time is 

extended to September 24, 2015.

_________________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 24th day of September, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
# EUR-Lex - 11992M/PRO/SEBC/34 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11992M/PRO/SEBC/34

**Treaty on European Union - Protocol on the statute of the european system of central banks and of the European Central Bank - Chapter VII: General provisions - Article 34: Legal acts **

*
Official Journal C 191 , 29/07/1992 P. 0075 *

Article 34

Legal acts

34.1. In accordance with Article 108a of this Treaty, the ECB shall:

- make regulations to the extent necessary to implement the tasks defined in Article 3.1, first indent, Articles 19.1, 22 or 25.2 and in cases which shall be laid down in the acts of the Council referred to in Article 42;

- take decisions necessary for carrying out the tasks entrusted to the ESCB under this Treaty and this Statute;

- make recommendations and deliver opinions.

34.2. A regulation shall have general application. It shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Recommendations and opinions shall have no binding force.

A decision shall be binding in its entirety upon those to whom it is addressed.

>Articles 190 to 192 of this Treaty shall apply to regulations and decisions adopted by the ECB.

The ECB may decide to publish its decisions, recommendations and opinions.

34.3. Within the limits and under the conditions adopted by the Council under the procedure laid down in Article 42, the ECB shall be entitled to impose fines or periodic penalty payments on undertakings for failure to comply with obligations under its regulations and decisions.
§ 96.59 Frequency assignment. ( a ) An SAS must determine the available and appropriate channels/frequencies for CBSDs at any given location using the information supplied by CBSDs, including location, the authorization status and operating parameters of other CBSDs in the surrounding area, information communicated by the ESC, other SASs, and such other information necessary to ensure effective operations of CBSDs consistent with this part. All such determinations and assignments shall be made in a non-discriminatory manner, consistent with this part. ( 1 ) Upon request from the Commission or a CBSD, an SAS must confirm whether frequencies are available in a given geographic area.
( 2 ) Upon request from the Commission, an SAS must confirm that CBSDs in a given geographic area and frequency band have been shut down or moved to another available frequency range in response to information received from the ESC.
( 3 ) If an SAS provides a range of available frequencies or channels to a CBSD, it may require that CBSD to confirm which channel or range of frequencies it will utilize.
( b ) Consistent with the requirements of § 96.25, an SAS shall assign geographically contiguous PALs held by the same Priority Access Licensee to the same channels in each geographic area, where feasible. The SAS shall also assign multiple channels held by the same Priority Access Licensee to contiguous frequencies within the same License Area, where feasible.
( c ) An SAS may temporarily assign PALs to different channels (within the frequency range authorized for Priority Access use) to protect Incumbent Access Users or if necessary to perform its required functions.
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0850An Assessment of Cost Reduction Strategies in a New Economy: Technical Report and Survey MonographMany public sector agencies including the police were faced with the need to reduce costs as a result of the global financial crisis of 2007-2008. In an effort to obtain information about potential cost reducing strategies for U.S. agencies, researchers surveyed 51 international agencies on their various strategies employed to reduce costs or increase efficiency to maintain their level of service delivery and community policing. Numerous strategies had been adopted by the agencies, and those identified as most promising include (1) collaboration with other police agencies, (2) sharing of services with other police agencies, (3) reduction in the layers of management, (4) merging of specialty units, and (5) reduction in divisions or policing areas.By Garth J. den Heyer, Edwin E. Hamilton, Karen L. Amendola, Mora Fiedler, James SpechtCategories: Data and AnalysisLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0850Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Nov 2017Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 06:03 (UTC-5) in 0.19 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
Case 16-25994 Doc 12 Filed 08/16/16 Entered 08/18/16 09:08:52 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
----

            DECISION No 1/2005 OF THE EC-EFTA JOINT COMMITTEE ON COMMON TRANSIT         

of 17 June 2005         

amending the Convention of 20 May 1987 on a common transit procedure

(2005/558/EC)

THE JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Convention of 20 May 1987 on a common transit procedure (1), and in particular Article 15(3)(a) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The Convention of 20 May 1987 on a common transit procedure is amended as follows:

Article 2

1.   This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

It shall be applicable from 1 May 2004.

2.   The forms based on the specimen forms in Annexes B1, B2, B4, B5 and B6 to Appendix III to the Convention may continue to be used, subject to the necessary adaptations to the geographical and residential references, until stocks are exhausted or until 1 March 2005 at the latest.

Done at Bern, 17 June 2005.

For the Joint Committee

The President

Rudolf DIETRICH            

----

(1)OJ L 226, 13.8.1987, p. 2. Convention as last amended by Decision No 2/2002 (OJ L 4, 9.1.2003, p. 18).

----

ANNEX A

Appendix I is amended as follows:

----

ANNEX B

Appendix II is amended as follows:

----

ANNEX C

Appendix III is amended as follows:

----
EXHIBIT  31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I,  Bruce  MacGregor,  certify  that:

1.  I  have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on  Form  10-Q  of  Pacific Peak
Investments.

2.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the  statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were  made,  not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report.

3.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other financial
information  included  in  this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects  the  financial  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods presented in this quarterly report.

4.  The  small  business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for  establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  over
financial  reporting  (as  defined  in  Exchange  Act  Rules  13(a)-15(e)  and
15(d)-15(e))  for  the  small  business  issuer  and  have:

a)  Designed  such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls  and  procedures  to  be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material  information  relating  to  the  small  business  issuer, including its
subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during  the  period  in  which  this  report  is  being  prepared;

b)  Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  small  business  issuer's disclosure
controls  and  procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness  of  the  disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period  covered  by  this  report  based  on  such  evaluation;  and

c)  Disclosed  in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the  small business
issuer's  most  recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter  in  the  case  of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect, the small business issuer's internal
control  over  financial  reporting.

5.  The  small  business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the small business issuer's auditors and
the  audit  committee  of  the  small  business  issuer's board of directors (or
persons  performing  the  equivalent  functions):

a)  All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
over  financial  reporting  which  are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
small  business  issuer's  ability  to  record,  process,  summarize  and report
financial  information;  and

b)  Any  fraud,  whether  or  not  material,  that  involves management or other
employees  who  have  a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
controls  over  financial  reporting.

August  10,  2005



              By:  /S/  Bruce  MacGregor
              --------------------------
              Bruce  MacGregor,  President
Editorial Note on Part 648
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 648 appear at 62 FR 14651, Mar. 27, 1997.

§ 648.352 Mid-Atlantic forage species framework measures. ( a ) *General.* The MAFMC may, at any time, initiate action to add or revise management measures if it finds that action is necessary to meet or be consistent with the goals and objectives of the Atlantic Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish FMP; the Atlantic Surfclam and Ocean Quahog FMP; the Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass FMP; the Atlantic Bluefish FMP; the Spiny Dogfish FMP; and Tilefish FMPs.
( b ) *Adjustment process.* The MAFMC shall develop and analyze appropriate management actions over the span of at least two MAFMC meetings. The MAFMC must provide the public with advance notice of the availability of the recommendation(s), appropriate justification(s) and economic and biological analyses, and the opportunity to comment on the proposed adjustment(s) at its first meeting, prior to its second meeting, and at its second meeting. The MAFMC's recommendations on adjustments or additions to management measures must come from one or more of the following categories: The list of Mid-Atlantic forage species, possession limits, annual landing limits, and any other measure currently included in the applicable FMPs specified in paragraph (a) of this section. Issues that require significant departures from previously contemplated measures or that are otherwise introducing new concepts may require an amendment of the FMPs instead of a framework adjustment.
( c ) *MAFMC recommendation.* See § 648.110(a)(2).
( d ) *NMFS action.* See § 648.110(a)(3).
( e ) *Emergency actions.* See § 648.110(a)(4).
§ 253.25 Other administrative requirements. ( a ) *Debt Collection Act.* In accordance with the provisions of the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996, a person may not obtain any Federal financial assistance in the form of a loan (other than a disaster loan) or loan guarantee if the person has an outstanding debt (other than a debt under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986) with any Federal agency which is in a delinquent status, as determined under standards prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury.
( b ) *Certifications.* Applicants must submit a completed Form CD-511, “Certifications Regarding Debarment, Suspension and Other Responsibility Matters; Drug-Free Workplace Requirements and Lobbying,” or its equivalent or successor form, if any.
( c ) *Taxpayer identification.* An applicant classified for tax purposes as an individual, limited liability company, partnership, proprietorship, corporation, or legal entity is required to submit along with the application a taxpayer identification number (TIN) (social security number, employer identification number as applicable, or registered foreign organization number). Recipients who either fail to provide their TIN or provide an incorrect TIN may have application processing or funding suspended until the requirement is met.
( d ) *Audit inquiry.* An audit of a Program loan may be conducted at any time. Auditors, selected at the discretion of the Program or other agency of the United States, shall have access to any and all books, documents, papers and records of the obligor or any other party to a financing that the auditor(s) deem(s) pertinent, whether written, printed, recorded, produced or reproduced by any mechanical, magnetic or other process or medium.
( e ) *Paperwork Reduction Act.* The application requirements contained in these rules have been approved under OMB control number 0648-0012. The applications for the halibut/sablefish QS crew member eligibility certificate have been approved under OMB control number 0648-0272. Notwithstanding any other provisions of law, no person is required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information displays a currently valid OMB control number.
Second Amendment to the Amerigon Incorporated



 EXHIBIT 10.1 
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE 
 AMERIGON INCORPORATED 2006 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 
 The last sentence of Section 18(a) of the Plan is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows: 
 “Notwithstanding the foregoing, (i) the restricted period for non-performance-based restricted stock awards (excluding those awards described in (iii) below) shall not be less than three years,
(ii) the restricted period for performance-based restricted stock awards shall not be less than one year and (iii) the restricted period for non-performance-based restricted stock awards that are granted to Participants who elect to
receive such awards in lieu of a cash bonus shall not be less than one year.”
Argued and submitted January 12,

reversed and remanded for reconsideration February 2, 1994

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Michelle Kopchak, Claimant. Michelle KOPCHAK, *Petitioner, v.*EUGENE BALLET COMPANY and Liberty Northwest Insurance Corporation, *Respondents.*

(WCB 91-06147; CA A78561)

866 P2d 526

Kevin Keaney argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, O’Leary & Conboy.

James D. McVittie argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Landau, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration. *Gallino v. Courtesy Pontiac-Buick-GMC,*124 Or App 538, 863 P2d 530 (1993).
[Crim. No. 300.

Third Appellate District.

May 27, 1915.]

#### THE PEOPLE, Appellant v. V. A. SOLARI, Respondent.

Criminal Law—Dismissal of Indictment.—The order of dismissal of the indictment in this case is affirmed on the authority of *People*v. *Knowles,*(Grim. No. 297), *ante,*p. 498.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Tuolumne County dismissing an indictment. G. W. Nicol, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

*511U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, and J. Charles Jones, Deputy Attorney-General, for Appellant.

J. C. Campbell, and J. C. Webster, for Respondent.

THE COURT.

Defendant was indicted for the same crime involved in *People*v. *Knowles,*(Crim. No. 297), *ante*p. 498 this day decided. When the case came on for trial defendant moved to dismiss the indictment on the same ground urged in the Knowles case and a like order was made as in that case. The people appeal from the order.

Solari was brought before the grand jury as a witness by subpoena, as was Knowles, and after he was sworn the district attorney made a statement to the witness substantially the same as he made to Knowles, to which he replied: “I am willing to make a statement.” Then follows his testimony, comprising some thirty odd pages of the transcript, and it is admitted that the indictment was based upon this testimony, at least in part. Upon the authority of the decision in *People*v. *Knowles,*(Crim. No. 297), *ante,*p. 498, the order is affirmed.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on July 26, 1915, and the following opinion then rendered thereon:

THE COURT.

The application for hearing in this court after decision by the district court of appeal of the third district is denied, for the reasons stated in our opinion filed in denying such a petition in the case of *People*v. *Knowles,*(Crim. No. 297), *ante,*p. 498.
U.S. Department of Justice

Office of Community Oriented Policing Services

 Fact Sheet cops.usdoj.gov

2023 Law Enforcement Mental Health 

and Wellness Act Program

Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness Act (LEMHWA) funds are used to improve the delivery of and access 

to mental health and wellness services for law enforcement through the implementation of peer support, training, family 

resources, suicide prevention, and other promising practices for wellness programs. The 2023 LEMHWA program funded 

projects that develop knowledge, increase awareness of effective mental health and wellness strategies, increase the skills and 

abilities of law enforcement, and increase the number of law enforcement agencies and relevant stakeholders using peer sup-

- -

-

-

port, training, family resources, suicide prevention, and other promising practices for wellness programs.

COPS Office Law Enforcement 

Mental Health and Wellness Act Awards

The 2023 LEMHWA program funded projects 

related to the following topic area:

	LEMHWA Implementation Projects

	National Level Resources, Training, and Technical Assis

tance Solicitation

The full listing of awarded projects is located on the COPS 

Office website at https://cops.usdoj.gov/lemhwa.

Funding Provisions

Provisions include the following:

	In FY 2023, the COPS Office awarded more than $8.5 

million under the LEMHWA Implementation Projects 

solicitation and almost $640,000 for the LEMHWA 

National Level Resources, Training, and Technical Assis

tance Solicitation.

	The LEMHWA solicitation was open to all local, state, 

tribal, and territorial law enforcement agencies. Proposals 

were responsive to the topic selected, improved the deliv

ery of and access to mental health and wellness services for 

law enforcement, and significantly advanced peer men

toring mental health and wellness programs within law 

enforcement agencies across the country.

September 2023

Contact the COPS Office

For more information about the LEMHWA program, 

please call the COPS Office Response Center at 

800-421-6770 or AskCOPSRC@usdoj.gov or visit the 

COPS Office website at https://cops.usdoj.gov.
2

FY23 Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness Act Program Map

2023 Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness Act Program

WYOMING

WISCONSIN

WEST 

VIRGINIA

WASHINGTON DC

WASHINGTON

VIRGINIA

VERMONT

UTAH

TEXAS

TENNESSEE

SOUTH DAKOTA

SOUTH CAROLINA

RHODE ISLAND

PENNSYLVANIA

OREGON

OKLAHOMA

OHIO

NORTH DAKOTA

NORTH CAROLINA

NEW YORK

NEW MEXICO

NEW JERSEY

NEW HAMPSHIRE

NEVADA

NEBRASKA

MONTANA

MISSOURI

MISSISSIPPI

MINNESOTA

MICHIGAN

MASSACHUSETTS

MARYLAND

MAINE

LOUISIANA

KANSAS KENTUCKY

IOWA

INDIANA ILLINOIS

IDAHO

HAWAII

GEORGIA

FLORIDA

DELAWARE

CONNECTICUT

COLORADO

CALIFORNIA

ARKANSAS ARIZONA

ALASKA

ALABAMA

LEMHWA Implementation

LEMHWA Resources and TTA

September 2023
§ 29.117 What reclamation and protection standards must I meet? ( a ) You must promptly clean up and remove from the refuge any released contaminating substances in accordance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws.
( b ) You must perform partial reclamation of areas that are no longer necessary to conduct operations. You must begin final reclamation within 6 months after you complete your authorized operations unless we authorize a different reclamation period in writing.
( c ) You must protect all survey markers (*e.g.,* monuments, witness corners, reference monuments, and bearing trees) against destruction, obliteration, or damage from operations. You are responsible for reestablishment, restoration, and referencing of any monuments, corners, and bearing trees that are destroyed, obliterated, or damaged by your operations.
( d ) You must complete reclamation by: ( 1 ) Plugging all wells;
( 2 ) Removing all above-ground structures, equipment, roads, and all other manmade material and debris resulting from operations;
( 3 ) Removing or neutralizing any contaminating substances;
( 4 ) Reestablishing native vegetative communities, or providing for conditions where ecological processes typical of the ecological zone (*e.g.,* plant or wildlife succession) will reestablish themselves;
( 5 ) Grading to conform the contours to pre-existing elevations as necessary to maximize ecological function;
( 6 ) Restoring conditions to pre-disturbance hydrologic movement and functionality;
( 7 ) Restoring natural systems using native soil material that is similar in character to the adjacent undisturbed soil profiles;
( 8 ) Ensuring that reclamation does not interfere with visitor use or with administration of the refuge;
( 9 ) Attaining conditions that are consistent with the management objectives of the refuge, designed to meet the purposes for which the refuge was established; and
( 10 ) Coordinating with us or with other operators who may be using a portion of your area of operations to ensure proper and equitable apportionment of reclamation responsibilities.