alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-7273

ELIJAH SHEPPARD, Claimant-Appellant, v.
GORDON H. MANSFIELD, Acting Se cretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

Elijah Sheppard , of Alexandria, Virginia, pro se.
L. Misha Preheim , Trial Attorney, Commercial Liti gation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, for respondent-appellee. With her on the brief were Peter D. Keisler , Acting Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson , Director, and Todd M. Hughes , Deputy Director. Of counsel were David J. Barrans , Deputy Assistant General Counsel, and Tracey P. Warren , Attorney, United States Department of Veterans Affa irs, of Washington, DC. Appealed from: United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims Judge Robert N. DavisNOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-7273 ELIJAH SHEPPARD, Claimant-Appellant,

v. GORDON H. MANSFIELD, Acting Se cretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

__________ ________________ DECIDED: November 15, 2007

__________________________ Before MAYER, Circuit Judge , FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge and GAJARSA, Circuit Judge

. PER CURIAM. Elijah Sheppard appeals the judgment of the United Stat es Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, which a ffirmed the Board of Veter ans’ Appeals decision denying service connection for his disabilities bec ause his discharge under other than honorable conditions was considered to be under dis honorable conditions for purposes of entitlement to veteran’s benefits. Sheppard v. Nicholson , No. 05-2495 (Vet. App. July 5, 2007). The board found that Sheppar d had a history of misconduct and was a “continual troublemaker.” The board further determi ned that at his commander’s request, Sheppard was furnished an Undesirable Discharge. Th e board then held this2007-7273 2 constituted willful and persistent misconduct under 38 C.F.R. § 3.12(d)(4), and Sheppard’s discharge for this reason is therefore “considered to have been issued under dishonorable conditions” for the purposes of veterans’ benefits. The Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims affirmed. Whether or not conduct constitutes willful and persistent misconduct is a factual
determination to which the b oard correctly applied 38 C.F. R. § 3.12(d). Because we lack authority to review either “a challenge to a fa ctual determination” or “a challenge to a law or regulation as applied to the facts of a particu lar case” absent a constitutional issue, 38 U.S.C. § 7292(d)(2), we dismiss the appeal.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> BD
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  662,200              29,169,952
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0                       0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0                       0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                         33,791,182              12,352,605
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,453,382              41,522,557
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0                       0
<PAYABLES>                                     662,200                 872,100
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0                       0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0                       0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                   0                       0
<LONG-TERM>                                          0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,791,182              40,650,457
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                34,453,382              41,522,557
<TRADING-REVENUE>                              498,702               4,727,652
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                           598,158               1,551,360
<COMMISSIONS>                                1,015,128               2,732,838
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                        0                       0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                        0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<COMPENSATION>                                       0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,157,326               4,646,979
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,157,326               4,646,979
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,157,326               4,646,979
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     5.41                   16.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     5.41                   16.73
        

</TABLE>
#### § 550.149 Program accessibility: Discrimination prohibited.

Except as otherwise provided in § 550.150, no qualified handicapped person shall, because the agency's facilities are inaccessible to or unusable by handicapped persons, be denied the benefits of, be excluded from participation in, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity conducted by the agency.
# EUR-Lex - 11957A122 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957A122

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY ( E.A.E.C. - EURATOM ), TITLE THREE - PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INSTITUTIONS, SECTION I: THE ASSEMBLY, SECTION II: THE COUNCIL, ARTICLE 122 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 122

THE COUNCIL MAY REQUEST THE COMMISSION TO UNDERTAKE ANY STUDIES WHICH THE COUNCIL CONSIDERS DESIRABLE FOR THE ATTAINMENT OF THE COMMON OBJECTIVES , AND TO SUBMIT TO IT ANY APPROPRIATE PROPOSALS .
#### § 20.39 Termination of possession.

Subject to all other requirements of this part, the possession of birds taken by any hunter shall be deemed to have ceased when such birds have been delivered by him to another person as a gift; or have been delivered by him to a post office, a common carrier, or a migratory bird preservation facility and consigned for transport by the Postal Service or a common carrier to some person other than the hunter.

[41 FR 31537, July 29, 1976]
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1354/2005

of 17 August 2005         

amending Council Regulation (EC) No 131/2004 concerning certain restrictive measures in respect of Sudan

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 131/2004 of 26 January 2004 concerning certain restrictive measures in respect of Sudan (1), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The Annex to Regulation (EC) No 131/2004 is hereby amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 August 2005.

For the Commission

Eneko LANDÁBURU            

Director-General of External Relations

----

(1)OJ L 21, 28.1.2004, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 838/2005 (OJ L 139, 26.5.2005, p. 6).

----

ANNEX

The Annex to Regulation (EC) No 131/2004 is amended as follows:

----
# Oregon Snow Survey

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Oregon Snow Survey 

###   About Us

The Snow Survey and Water Supply Forecasting Program collects mountain hydroclimatic data that is used to produce volumetric streamflow forecasts and generate products that quantify surface water supplies and inform natural resource management. Click "About Us" above to learn more.

----

## Current Conditions 

              - **Water Year-To-Date Precipitation**
              - **Monthly Precipitation**  
              - **Snowpack - Snow Water Equivalent**

##   Reports

###   Water Supply Outlook

Monthly reports for Oregon are available the first of each month from January 1 to June 1 with data provided by basin.

June 1, 2024 WSOR

###   Flood Awareness

These reports raise awareness for potential flood events resulting from post-fire storm and rain-on-snow events.

Most recent reports

###   Daily Update

This daily report includes hourly data by basin for snow water equivalent and water year-to-date precipitation.

Today's Update Report

Data Products & Reports

Water Supply

Conditions

Site Information & Metadata

----

###   Contact Oregon Snow Survey

###   Drought Information

##   News and Updates

NewsOregon Soil Monitoring Initiative: Year 1November 01, 2023

NewsDanger Close: Wildfires and SNOTELsAugust 30, 2023

NewsNRCS Associate Chief Louis Aspey visits Mt. Hood SNOTELJune 15, 2023

            -  View More News 
            -  View More Events
§ 510.5 Notice of meetings. ( a ) Notice of each committee meeting shall be timely published in the Federal Register. Publication shall be considered timely if made at least 15 days before the date of the meeting, except that shorter notice may be provided in emergency situations.
( b ) The notice shall state the time, place, schedule and purposes of the committee meeting, and shall include, whenever it is available, a summary of the agenda. The notice shall indicate the approximate times at which any portion of the meeting will be closed to the public and shall include an explanation for the closing of any portion of the meeting pursuant to § 510.7.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHN WAYNE WARDEN, Jr.,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

NAYELIE BARRIGAN, CRN, Certified

Registered Nurse at ADOC Yuma,

Cocopah Medical Unit; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 13-15989

D.C. No. 2:11-cv-01461-DGC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

David G. Campbell, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 22, 2014** 

Before: GOODWIN, CANBY, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Former Arizona state prisoner John Wayne Warden, Jr., appeals pro se from

the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging

deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28

FILED

JUL 31 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Szajer v. City of Los Angeles, 632 F.3d 607,

610 (9th Cir. 2011). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Warden

failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendants were

deliberately indifferent by denying or delaying post-operative treatment for his left

eye, or by interfering with his ability to receive post-operative treatment. See

Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1057-58 (9th Cir. 2004) (prison officials act

with deliberate indifference only if they know of and disregard an excessive risk to

inmate health; a prisoner’s difference of opinion concerning the course of

treatment does not amount to deliberate indifference); Hallett v. Morgan, 296 F.3d

732, 745-46 (9th Cir. 2002) (delay of medical treatment does not constitute

deliberate indifference unless delay led to further injury). 

We reject Warden’s contention that the district court abused its discretion in

considering defendants’ evidence. 

AFFIRMED. 

2 13-15989
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                          HOLLINGER INTERNATIONAL INC.
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the annual report of Hollinger International Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report), I,
Gordon A. Paris, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: November 2, 2005

                                               /s/ Gordon A. Paris
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Name: Gordon A. Paris
                                               Title: Chairman and President and
                                                      Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Hollinger International Inc. and will be retained by Hollinger
International Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
Case 16-24297    Doc 51    Filed 11/20/17    Entered 11/20/17 11:00:54    Desc Main Document      Page 1 of 3

Case 16-24297    Doc 51    Filed 11/20/17    Entered 11/20/17 11:00:54    Desc Main Document      Page 2 of 3

Case 16-24297    Doc 51    Filed 11/20/17    Entered 11/20/17 11:00:54    Desc Main Document      Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<CIK>     0001083866
<NAME>     E-COM TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
<MULTIPLIER>     1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      40,367
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,272
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            54,639
<PP&E>                                      48,282
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,336
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              94,585
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       49,574
<BONDS>                                      9,463
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                   205,591
<OTHER-SE>                                (170,043)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                94,585
<SALES>                                     51,890
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            51,890
<CGS>                                       24,463
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               24,463
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           197,069
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (169,642)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (169,642)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                              (169,642)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (.010)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.010)


</TABLE>
Searched for **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/EN-05-10006.pdf**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/EN-05-10006.pdf**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
CONTROL 

NUMBER

DATE 

CLOSED

SUBJECT OF REQUEST FINAL ACTION

2017-FOI-012 1/9/2017 Req for lists for of awards for all grant programs from 1994 to present TOTAL GRANT

2017-FOI-013 1/9/2017 Request of lists of grants accepted and grants rejected from 1994 to present to 

include the names of partnership organizations

TOTAL GRANT

2017-FOI-016 1/25/2017 Request for demographic form, budget detail and budget narrative for 2016 

CTAS application for Choctaw Nation on Oklahoma-Purpose Area 1

PARTIAL 

DENIAL/PARTIAL 

GRANT

2017-FOI-020 1/26/2017 Request for name, title, work email and mailing address for following positions 

within COPS: Human Relations Directors, Civil Rights Directors, EEO Directors, 

Labor Relations Directors, Workers' Compensation Directors, Training 

Directors, etc.

TOTAL GRANT

2017-FOI-021 2/1/2017 Request for copy of the 2016 CPD Microgrant application and any notes for 

non approval

TOTAL GRANT

2017-FOI-022 1/31/2017 Request for grants applications for Richmond Police Department, City of 

Chicago, Tampa Police Department and Almeda County

PARTIAL 

DENIAL/PARTIAL 

GRANT

2017-FOI-023 1/25/2017 Request for list of Constrolled Substance Analogues and controlled substances 

that are illicit under NC law but not controlled by fed law

REFERRAL TO USAO

2017-FOI-024 3/3/2017 Request for copy of all emails from the eop.gov domain NO RECORD

2017-FOI-025 2/28/2017 Request for copies of all DOJ transition materials prepared by DOJ component 

officials and provided to Donald J. Trump administration

DENIAL

2017-FOI-026 3/6/2017 Request for a copy of the 2016 AHTG application of the Connecticut 

Department of Public Safety and California Department of Justice Program and 

2016 CAMP application California Department of Justice

PARTIAL 

DENIAL/PARTIAL 

GRANT

2017-FOI-027 2/22/2017 Request for copies of Tampa Police Department applicaton and Richmond 

Police Department for 2016 CPD

PARTIAL 

DENIAL/PARTIAL 

GRANT

2017-FOI-028 3/16/2017 Request for sope of work, objectives, and goals of project for grant number 

2015CKWXK013

TOTAL GRANT
2017-FOI-030 2/21/2017 Request for a copy of Assessing Responses to Problems: An Introductory Guide 

for Police Problems Solvers and Excellence in Problem-Oriented Policing: the 

1999 Herman Goldstein Award Winners

TOTAL GRANT

2017-FOI-031 3/16/2017 Request for a table contents of all publications copy of Assessing Responses to 

Problems: An Introductory Guide for Police Problems Solvers and Excellence in 

Problem-Oriented Policing: the 1999 Herman Goldstein Award Winners

TOTAL GRANT

2017-FOI-032 3/3/2017 Request for the final release letter to the MPD TOTAL GRANT

2017-FOI-035 3/14/2017 Request for data that indicates the race of all people pulled over by the 

Connecticut police

NO RECORD

2017-FOI-036 3/17/2017 Req for lists for of awards for CHP from 1994 to present TOTAL GRANT
**Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)I, Randy K. Ferrell, as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Fauquier Bankshares, Inc.,certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended June 30, 2007, which accompanies this certification fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information containedin the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of Fauquier Bankshares, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. Theforegoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaims anyobligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.Dated: August 10, 2007           /s/ Randy K. Ferrell   Randy K. Ferrell   President and Chief Executive Officer
Editorial Note on Part 622
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 622 appear at 79 FR 57837, Sept. 26, 2014 and at 81 FR 32253, May 23, 2016.

§ 622.204 At-sea observer coverage. ( a ) *Required coverage.* A vessel for which a Federal commercial permit for South Atlantic rock shrimp or South Atlantic penaeid shrimp has been issued must carry a NMFS-approved observer, if the vessel's trip is selected by the SRD for observer coverage.
( b ) *Notification to the SRD.* When observer coverage is required, an owner or operator must advise the SRD in writing not less than 5 days in advance of each trip of the following: ( 1 ) Departure information (port, dock, date, and time).
( 2 ) Expected landing information (port, dock, and date).
( c ) *Observer accommodations and access.* An owner or operator of a vessel on which a NMFS-approved observer is embarked must: ( 1 ) Provide accommodations and food that are equivalent to those provided to the crew.
( 2 ) Allow the observer access to and use of the vessel's communications equipment and personnel upon request for the transmission and receipt of messages related to the observer's duties.
( 3 ) Allow the observer access to and use of the vessel's navigation equipment and personnel upon request to determine the vessel's position.
( 4 ) Allow the observer free and unobstructed access to the vessel's bridge, working decks, holding bins, weight scales, holds, and any other space used to hold, process, weigh, or store fish.
( 5 ) Allow the observer to inspect and copy the vessel's log, communications logs, and any records associated with the catch and distribution of fish for that trip.
§ 18.94 Pacific walrus (Alaska). ( a ) Pursuant to sections 101(a)(3)(A) 103, and 109 of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, the moratorium on the hunting and killing of Pacific walrus (*Odobenus rosmarus*) in waters or on lands subject to the jurisdiction of the State of Alaska, the United States, or on the high seas by any person, vessel, or conveyance subject to the jurisdiction of the State of Alaska or the United States, is waived, provided that beginning August 2, 1979 this waiver shall not be effective, and no taking or importation under the waiver shall be allowed, until this section is amended to establish regulations to effectively control taking and otherwise implement the waiver.
( b ) [Reserved]
[41 FR 14373, Apr. 5, 1976, as amended at 44 FR 45566, Aug. 2, 1979]
###### Editorial Note on Part 622

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 622 appear at 79 FR 57837, Sept. 26, 2014 and at 81 FR 32253, May 23, 2016.

#### § 622.436 Anchoring restrictions.

The owner or operator of any fishing vessel, recreational or commercial, that fishes for or possesses reef fish in or from the EEZ around Puerto Rico must ensure that the vessel uses only an anchor retrieval system that recovers the anchor by its crown, thereby preventing the anchor from dragging along the bottom during recovery. For a grapnel hook, this could include an incorporated anchor rode reversal bar that runs parallel along the shank, which allows the rode to reverse and slip back toward the crown. For a fluke- or plow-type anchor, a trip line consisting of a line from the crown of the anchor to a surface buoy is required.