alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Marderos Papazian *et al. vs.*Hachadoor S. Emerzian.

JANUARY 26, 1944.

Present: Flynn, C. J., Moss, Capotosto, Baker and Condon, JJ. '

Per Curiam.

The complainants, by leave of court, filed a motion for reargument on several grounds, one of which is that the second mortgage in question is in violation of the H.O.L.C. regulation and therefore void because its terms deprived them of a reasonable opportunity to pay that mortgage. In support of this contention the complainants incorporate in said motion a statement of their expenses under the first and second mortgages and the income that the real estate could yield from May 4, 1934, the date of the second mortgage, to May 4,1937, when it would be due and payable. Adding to these expenses the principal of the second mortgage, the statement shows a deficit on May 4, 1937 of a relatively small sum.

The corporation was called upon to act in a time of stress and emergency. Looking at the whole matter prospectively, as the H.O.L.C. committee had to do, it was not unreasonable to believe that conditions would improve and that on *484a reasonable consideration of complainants’ financial situation, including wages, they could meet the required obligations. The regulation does not require that the committee’s decision be correct to a mathematical certainty. Because a retrospective view of complainants’ income and wages might show some slight variation from the committee’s mathematical computation, it would not follow that its decision was unreasonable or arbitrary. Under all the circumstances in evidence, we are of the opinion that the committee exercised reasonable discretion in the matter within the regulation when it allowed the second mortgage in question.

*Philip S. Knauer, Knauer & Knauer,*for complainants.

*Francis I. McCanna,*for respondent.

The complainants further contend that the second mortgage was not within the regulation and is void because the attorney for the corporation testified that he was not aware of the regulation and therefore “it is not to be supposed that the other members of the 'Committee’ knew about it.” The premise does not justify the conclusion, unless all the other evidence and the reasonable inferences therefrom are disregarded. The fact still remains that the terms of the second mortgage as fixed by the corporation were reasonably in accordance with the provisions of the regulation.

After due consideration of all matters urged in complainants’motion for reargument, it is our judgment that no cause has been shown why the opinion of the court, as previously filed in this cause, should not stand.

^Motion for reargument denied.
Case 16-25111 Doc 1 Filed 08/04/16 Entered 08/04/16 14:27:59 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 10
Case 16-25111 Doc 1 Filed 08/04/16 Entered 08/04/16 14:27:59 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 10
Case 16-25111 Doc 1 Filed 08/04/16 Entered 08/04/16 14:27:59 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 10
Case 16-25111 Doc 1 Filed 08/04/16 Entered 08/04/16 14:27:59 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 10
Case 16-25111 Doc 1 Filed 08/04/16 Entered 08/04/16 14:27:59 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 10
Case 16-25111 Doc 1 Filed 08/04/16 Entered 08/04/16 14:27:59 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 10
Case 16-25111 Doc 1 Filed 08/04/16 Entered 08/04/16 14:27:59 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 10
Case 16-25111 Doc 1 Filed 08/04/16 Entered 08/04/16 14:27:59 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 10
Case 16-25111 Doc 1 Filed 08/04/16 Entered 08/04/16 14:27:59 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 10
Case 16-25111 Doc 1 Filed 08/04/16 Entered 08/04/16 14:27:59 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 10
October Photo Contest Winner
Sutin Award Winners
Social Media 101
SROs and Creating Safe Spaces
COPS Office at IACP
 
 Subscribe to newsletterSubscribe The Beat The Beat Learning Portal Learning Learning Portal Archives     Search Dispatch:
    Search
 2015 L. Anthony Sutin Civic Imagination Award Winners The L. Anthony Sutin Civic Imagination Award pictureThe COPS Office is pleased to announce Columbia Heights (Minnesota) Police Chief Scott Lewis Nadeau and Columbia Heights Superintendent Kathy L. Kelly as the winners of the 2015 L. Anthony Sutin Civic Imagination Award. The Sutin Civic Imagination Award recognizes the efforts of collaborative partnerships within the community. This honor is bestowed upon a team of law enforcement and community members whose innovative civic interactions have transformed public safety in their community. Nominees are those actively engaged with the community in a multifaceted manner that has been sustained over time and has resulted in positive, observable public safety outcomes. An ideal nominee: creates sustainable collaborations that are innovative, creative, and transformative;
displays civic leadership through problem solving and collaborative partnerships;
institutionalizes sustainable, positive, observable public safety outcomes;
promotes public safety through dedication to the community policing philosophy. Columbia Heights Chief Scott Lewis Nadeau and Columbia Heights Superintendent Kathy Kelly developed a strategic partnership between the police department and the school district. Together, they invested in the community and schools to improve and meet the specific needs of the students. Overall, the leadership and partnership of Superintendent Kelly and Chief Nadeau has created a positive and strong response prior to a critical incident. Their passion for safety and the well-being of the community embodies all of the principles of the L. Anthony Sutin Civic Imagination Award. For their great work and dedication to the community, the COPS Office congratulates Chief Nadeau and Superintendent Kelly on winning the 2015 L. Anthony Sutin Civic Imagination Award! Nazmia E.A. Comrie
Senior Social Science Analyst
COPS Office **Back to top** October Photo Contest Winner | Sutin Award Winners | Social Media 101 | SROs and Creating Safe Spaces | COPS Office at IACP
 FOIA No Fear Act Open Government Plain Writing Privacy Policy USA.gov Legal Policies and Disclaimers Language Access Plan
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jones Soda Co. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Hassan N. Natha, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |               
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --------------
|/s/ Hassan N. Natha     |  |  |  | August 9, 2007
|Hassan N. Natha         |  |  |  |               
|Chief Financial Officer |  |  |  |
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 18 (Friday, January 27, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 4598]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-775]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney 
Disorders, Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2) notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The purpose of this meeting is to evaluate requests 
for preclinical development resources for potential new therapeutics 
for type 1 diabetes. The outcome of the evaluation will be a decision 
whether NIDDK should support the request and make available contract 
resources for development of the potential therapeutic to improve the 
treatment or prevent the development of type 1 diabetes and its 
complications. The research proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the proposed research projects, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Disorders Special Emphasis Panel, Type 1 Diabetes--Rapid 
Access to Intervention Development.
    Date: February 1, 2006.
    Time: 10 a.m.-11 a.m.
    Agenda: To evaluate requests for preclinical development 
resources for potential new therapeutics for type 1 diabetes and its 
complications.
    Place: 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Dr. Myrlene Staten, Senior Advisor, Diabetes 
Translation Research, Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and 
Metabolic Diseases, NIDDK, NIH, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, 
MD 20892-5460, 301 402-7886.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 98.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 19, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy
[FR Doc. 06-775 Filed 1-26-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-1-M
exv10w6



 






Exhibit 10.6




Directors Compensation



Effective January 1, 2006, compensation for each non-employee director of the Company is as follows:




	 	(i)	 	$15,000 in cash; and






	 	(ii)	 	$15,000 in restricted stock to be issued under the company’s Equity Compensation Plan; fifty percent of
such restricted stock shall vest on each of the first two anniversaries of the date of grant.
August 23, 2013

Mr. Michael DeMarchi

Designated Employee Representative

Centennial Helicopters , Inc.

53 Miry Brook Road

Danbury, CT 06810

Dear Mr. DeMarchi :

This is in response to your August 12 , 2013 letter sent to the public docket ( No. FAA

- 20 09

- 1208 ) petitionin g the Federal Aviation Administration on behalf of Centennial Helicopters

, Inc. ( Centennial ) for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations

( 14 CFR) . That exemption, if granted, would allow MFS to cover its safety

- sensitive

employ ees under one testing program

.

On July 15, 2013 , the FAA published the Combined Drug and Alcohol Testing Programs

final r ule (78 FR 41999) relating to air carrier operators and commuter or on

- demand

operators that also conduct commercial air tour operatio ns to combine the drug and alcohol

testing required for each operation into one testing program . A copy of this rule change is

enclosed for your information.

If you have any questions, please contact the FAAs Drug Abatement Division at (202) 267

- 8442 or drugabatement@faa.gov

. Because the relief you seek is now covered under the new

rule, we will take no further action on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/

Ida M. Klepper

Manager, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Divisi on

Enclosure
EXHIBIT 99.2
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jupitermedia Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Christopher J. Baudouin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Christopher J. Baudouin


Christopher J. Baudouin
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
May 15, 2003


THIS CERTIFICATION IS MADE SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, SUBJECT
TO THE KNOWLEDGE STANDARD THEREIN, AND NOT FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4747 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4747

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow claims for credits 
 and refunds in certain cases where the statute of limitations is open 
                  for the assessment of a deficiency.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 13, 1994

  Mr. Moran introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow claims for credits 
 and refunds in certain cases where the statute of limitations is open 
                  for the assessment of a deficiency.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLAIMS FOR CREDITS AND REFUNDS PERMITTED IN CERTAIN CASES 
              WHERE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS IS OPEN FOR ASSESSMENT OF 
              DEFICIENCY.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (d) of section 6511 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to limitations on credit or refund) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
        ``(7) Special period of limitation where statute is open for 
        assessment of deficiency.--If the claim for credit or refund 
        relates to an overpayment of the tax imposed by subtitle A with 
        respect to a taxable year for which an assessment of a 
        deficiency may be made by reason of 6501(e), in lieu of the 3-
        year period referred to in subsection (a), the limitation shall 
        be 6 years.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years with respect to which the statute of limitations 
for the assessment of a deficiency has not expired before the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# EUR-Lex - 11965F017 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11965F017

**TREATY ESTABLISHING A SINGLE COUNCIL AND A SINGLE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, CHAPTER II: THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, ARTICLE 17 **

*
Official Journal L 152 , 13/07/1967 P. 0006 *

++++

ARTICLE 17

THE COMMISSION SHALL ACT BY A MAJORITY OF THE NUMBER OF MEMBERS PROVIDED FOR IN ARTICLE 10 .

A MEETING OF THE COMMISSION SHALL BE VALID ONLY IF THE NUMBER OF MEMBERS LAID DOWN IN ITS RULES OF PROCEDURE IS PRESENT .
An official website of the United States government "Here is how you know"


Official websites use.gov  .gov
 Secure .gov websites use HTTPS 
	A lock https:


Menu
        ABOUTDirector's Corner
Contact COPS
Community Policing in Action: Photo Contest
The L. Anthony Sutin Award for Innovative Law Enforcement and Community Partnerships
Photo Galleries
Subscribe
NEWSPress Releases
Executive Order on Advancing Effective, Accountable Policing and Criminal Justice Practices to Enhance Public Trust and Public Safety
GRANTSSolicitation Finder
Funding Opportunities
How To Apply
Grants Deadlines and Announcement Dates
Compliance and Reporting
Program Documents
Grantee Success Stories
Award Announcement Map
RESOURCESCritical Incident Review: Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, TX
National Blue Alert Network
Resource Center/Publications
E-Newsletter: Community Policing Dispatch
Podcast Series: The Beat
Video Series: What’s New in Blue
Tribal Community Policing Resources
Community Policing Topics
Community Violence Intervention
Addressing Human TraffickingLabor Trafficking
Recruitment, Hiring & Retention
Filing a Civil Rights Complaint
TRAINING & TECHNICAL ASSISTANCECollaborative Reform InitiativeCRI-TAC
Critical Response
Organizational Assessments
COPS Training Portal
Training
ACCOUNT ACCESS
 Search form
    Search






Technology and Equipment Program                                                  AWARD ANNOUNCEMENT DOCUMENTS

Award List

Award Owner's Manual

AWARD MANAGEMENT DOCUMENTS

Budget Modification Fact Sheet
	Sole Source Justification Fact Sheet
	SF-425 Fact Sheet

SF-425 Helpful Hints
	Consultant Contractor Fact Sheet

***For additional assistance, we encourage you to visit the Award Management Materials Page, where you will find frequently asked questions, additional fact sheets, links to webinars, and other resources.***


*Error*: Call to undefined function create_function() in *features_remove_recursion()* (line *1093* of *E:\Web\Drupal\sites\all\modules\features-7.x-2.10\features\features.export.inc*).


SPOTLIGHT


SUBSCRIBE TO EMAIL UPDATES
 
 SUBSCRIBE TO CP DISPATCH


ABOUT Contact COPS
	Community Policing in Action: Photo Contest
	The L. Anthony Sutin Award for Innovative Law Enforcement and Community Partnerships
	Photo Galleries
	Subscribe NEWS Press Releases
	Executive Order on Safe Policing for Safer Communities
 GRANTS Compliance & Reporting
	Program Documents
	Grantees
	Grantee Success Stories
	Agency Portal Video Tutorials
	Award Announcement Map RESOURCES National Blue Alert Network
	Recent Releases
	Resource Center/Publications
	E-Newsletter: Community Policing Dispatch
	Podcast Series: The Beat
	Video Series: What’s New in Blue
	Tribal Community Policing Resources
	Addressing Human Trafficking
	Community Policing Topics
	Recruitment, Hiring & Retention
 TRAINING & TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Collaborative Reform Initiative for Technical Assistance Center
	COPS Training Portal
	Training ACCOUNT ACCESS ACCESSIBILITY INFORMATION


FOIA Language Access Plan Legal Policies and Disclaimers No Fear Act Open Government Plain Writing Privacy Policy USA.gov Whistleblower Protection Social Media Department of Justice Accessibility
§ 218.96 Letters of Authorization. ( a ) To incidentally take marine mammals pursuant to the regulations in this subpart, the Navy must apply for and obtain an LOA in accordance with § 216.106 of this section.
( b ) An LOA, unless suspended or revoked, may be effective for a period of time not to exceed July 30, 2027.
( c ) If an LOA expires prior to July 30, 2027, the Navy may apply for and obtain a renewal of the LOA.
( d ) In the event of projected changes to the activity or to mitigation, monitoring, or reporting (excluding changes made pursuant to the adaptive management provision of § 218.97(c)(1)) required by an LOA issued under this subpart, the Navy must apply for and obtain a modification of the LOA as described in § 218.97.
( e ) Each LOA will set forth: ( 1 ) Permissible methods of incidental taking;
( 2 ) Geographic areas for incidental taking;
( 3 ) Means of effecting the least practicable adverse impact (*i.e.,* mitigation) on the species of marine mammals and their habitat; and
( 4 ) Requirements for monitoring and reporting.
( f ) Issuance of the LOA(s) must be based on a determination that the level of taking is consistent with the findings made for the total taking allowable under the regulations in this subpart.
( g ) Notice of issuance or denial of the LOA(s) will be published in the Federal Register within 30 days of a determination.
§ 260.48 Application to become a licensed sampler. Application to become a licensed sampler shall be made to the Secretary on forms furnished for that purpose. Each such application shall be signed by the applicant in his own handwriting, and the information contained therein shall be certified by him to be true, complete, and correct to the best of his knowledge and belief, and the application shall contain or be accompanied by: ( a ) A statement showing his present and previous occupations, together with names of all employers for whom he has worked, with periods of service, during the 10 years previous to the date of his application;
( b ) A statement that, in his capacity as a licensed sampler, he will not draw samples from any lot of processed products with respect to which he or his employer is an interested party;
( c ) A statement that he agrees to comply with all terms and conditions of the regulations in this part relating to duties of licensed samplers; and
( d ) Such other information as may be requested.
Exhibit 23.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm













Abraxas Petroleum Corporation


San Antonio, Texas




We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-127480, 333-132971, 333-143728, 333-162573, and 333-163763) and Form S-8 (No. 333-17375, 333-17377, 033-81416, 333-55691, 333-74614, 333-74592, 333-135032, 333-153635, 333-162358 and 333-168022) of Abraxas Petroleum Corporation of our reports dated March 16, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements, and the effectiveness of Abraxas Petroleum Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.








/s/ BDO USA, LLP





BDO USA, LLP


Dallas, Texas




March 16, 2011