alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Brown, *Appellant,*v. The Terre Haute *&*Indianapolis Railroad Company.

Nunc pro tunc Orders: corporation. A judgment against a corporation cannot be corrected *nunc pro tunc*by striking out the name under which the defeiidant was sued and served with process, and substituting another name.

*Appeal from Cape Girardeau Court of Common Pleas.*— Hon. H. G-. Wilson, Judge.

Aeeirmed.

There was no appearance on the part of the defendant in the court below, except for the special purpose of objecting to the jurisdiction.

*Lewis Brown pro se.*

An amendment of a judgment, by correcting the name of a defendant, may be made at any time. *Parry v. Woodson,*33 Mo. 347; *Bergen v. Bolton,*10 Mo. 658 ; *Hanly v. Dewees,*1 Mo. 16 ; *Gibson v. Chouteau,*45 Mo. 171. The filing of the amended petition cured the error of the original ; the judgment should have followed the amended petition.

*Everett W. Pattison, amicus curiae, contra.*

Henry, J.

The original petition was against the Terre Haute & Indianapolis and Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad Company, to recover $200 for professional services, plaintiff stating iii his petition that “ the defendant is a corpora*568tion,” etc. The summons was returnable to the January term, 1877, of the Cape Girardeau court of common pleas, and was served by the sheriff of St. Louis county, December 11th, 1876, “ by delivering a copy of the writ and petition to the general manager of the Terre Haute & Indianapolis and- St. Louis Railroad Company,” etc. At the return term of the writ, the plaintiff filed an amended petition, identical with the original, except in the name of the party defendant therein, substituting for the original defendant the name of the Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad Company. On this amended petition there was a trial, and verdict and judgment for plaintiff; but the judgment entered was against the original defendant only, and at the May term, 1877, the plaintiff filed a motion in the cause, asking the court to enter a judgment *nunc pro tunc*against the Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad Company. The motion was overruled, and the plaintiff has appealed. As there was no service of the summons on the Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad Company, the court was not authorized, at any stage of the proceedings, to .render a judgment against it. The judgment which plaintiff seeks to correct, would have been a nullity, if it had been originally entered as plaintiff now asks to have it made. The judgment *nunc pro tune*asked for, would, if entered, have been a nullity, and it cannot be an error in the court to refuse to do what would be entirely nugatory if done. All concurring, the judgment is affirmed.
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5220 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5220

                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
 the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  four


                                 An Act

  
 
  To provide for the acceptance by the Secretary of Education of 
applications submitted by the local educational agency serving the 
Window Rock Unified School District, Window Rock, Arizona, under section 
3 of the Act of September 30, 1950 (Public Law 874, 81st Congress) for 
fiscal years 1994 and 1995.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. APPLICATION BY WINDOW ROCK, ARIZONA, LOCAL EDUCATIONAL 
AGENCY FOR FUNDING UNDER SECTION 3 OF PUBLIC LAW 874, 81ST CONGRESS.
    Notwithstanding section 5(a)(2) of the Act of September 30, 1950 
(Public Law 874, 81st Congress; 20 U.S.C. 240(a)(2)) (as such section 
was in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of the 
Improving America's Schools Act of 1994), the Secretary of Education 
shall accept from the local educational agency serving the Window Rock 
Unified School District, Window Rock, Arizona, applications for funding 
under section 3 of the Act of September 30, 1950 (as so in effect) for 
fiscal years 1994 and 1995 as if such applications were timely received 
in accordance with section 222.10(a)(1) of title 34, Code of Federal 
Regulations.







                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.







                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.`
Editorial Note on Part 648
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 648 appear at 62 FR 14651, Mar. 27, 1997.

§ 648.104 Summer flounder size requirements. ( a ) *Moratorium (commercial) permitted vessels.* The minimum size for summer flounder is 14 inches (35.6 cm) TL for all vessels issued a moratorium permit under § 648.4(a)(3), except on board party and charter boats carrying passengers for hire or carrying more than three crew members, if a charter boat, or more than five crew members, if a party boat.
( b ) *Party/charter permitted vessels and recreational fishery participants.* The minimum size for summer flounder is 18.5 inches (46.99 cm) total length for all vessels that do not qualify for a summer flounder moratorium permit under § 648.4(a)(3), and charter boats holding a summer flounder moratorium permit if fishing with more than three crew members, or party boats holding a summer flounder moratorium permit if fishing with passengers for hire or carrying more than five crew members, unless otherwise specified in the conservation-equivalency regulations at § 648.107. If conservation equivalency is not in effect in any given year, possession of smaller (or larger, if applicable) summer flounder harvested from state waters is allowed for state-only permitted vessels when transiting Federal waters within the Block Island Sound Transit Area provided they follow the provisions at § 648.111 and abide by state regulations.
( c ) *Measurement.* The size limits in this section apply to whole fish or to any part of a fish found in possession, *e.g.,* fillets, except that party and charter vessels fishing exclusively in state waters possessing valid state permits authorizing filleting at sea may possess fillets smaller than the size specified if all state requirements are met.
[76 FR 60629, Sept. 29, 2011, as amended at 78 FR 37479, June 21, 2013; 82 FR 31494, July 7, 2017; 84 FR 65702, Nov. 29, 2019; 87 FR 35116, June 9, 2022; 88 FR 55418, Aug. 15, 2023; 89 FR 32378, Apr. 26, 2024]
#### § 90.245 Fixed relay stations.

Except where specifically provided for, fixed relay stations shall be authorized to operate only on frequencies available for use by operational fixed stations.
{00010830 / 2013 / 021 /} 1

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

In re: § Case No. 16-27899

Patrick J. Leib § Chapter 7

§

Debtor(s) §

§

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

To: See attached Service List

I, the undersigned attorney, certify that I served a copy of NOTICE OF TRUSTEE’S FINAL 

REPORT AND APPLICATIONS FOR COMPENSATION AND DEADLINE TO 

OBJECT (NFR) upon the person(s) listed above by mailing the same by First Class U.S. Mail at 

Chicago, Illinois on the date set forth below, unless a copy was served electronically which 

occurs automatically upon the filing of the aforesaid documents with the Clerk of the Bankruptcy 

Court through the CM/ECF system.

Dated: July 7, 2017 /s/ Joji Takada

Bankruptcy Trustee

Prepared by:

Joji Takada

TAKADA LAW OFFICE, LLC

6336 North Cicero Avenue, Suite 201

Chicago, Illinois 60646

Tel: 773-790-4888

SERVICE LIST

Town Center Bank

120 S. LaSalle St. #1335

Chicago, IL 60603 

Patrick J. Leib

16420 S. River Road 

Plainfield, IL 60586

 Thomas J. Dillon t.dillon@mcdillaw.com

 Patrick S Layng USTPRegion11.ES.ECF@usdoj.gov

 Joji Takada trustee@takadallc.com, jtakada@ecf.epiqsystems.com

 Thomas W Toolis twt@jtlawllc.com, 

lld@jtlawllc.com;axb@jtlawllc.com;reception@jtlawllc.com

Case 16-27899 Doc 54 Filed 07/07/17 Entered 07/07/17 10:43:59 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
### SERVED : JANUAR Y 5 , 201 2 U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTI^NSPOR'l'ATlO N

OFFIC E O FHEARFNGS WASHINGTON , D C [ N TH E MATTERO F WESTEl ^ TIRE EQUIPMEN T AN D SUPPLY CO. , INC . FA A DOCKE T NO . [T O B E ASSIGNED ] (Civi l Penall y Action ) FDMSNO . FAA-20n-I29 I ••^•^CKH-OPERATION S /ei Z JA,V-b - AS--5 b

NOTIC E O FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (herclofore designate da s Cas e No . 2010WP700I26 ) ha s been assigne d to Administrativ e La

w Judg e RichardC . Goodwin . All futur e pleading s an dothe r communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l b e serve don the Judge , th e FA A Hearin g Docket , an

dth e othe r

person s on th e attache dServic e List .

Rofinie A . Yoder- ' / -Chie f Administrativ e LavyOudge

/ 

### Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFDMSNo . FAA-20I1-12 9 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Chri s Dcralas , Presiden t Wester n Tir e Equipmen t an dSuppl y Co. , Inc. , Resf?oncleni 1480 2 Yorb aCour t Chino.C A 9171 0 TEL : 909-303-488 0 FAX : 909-393-674 7 Christophe r

Merrill , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counse l Western-Pacifi c Region , AWP-7. 3 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n P.O . Bo x 9200 7 Lo s Angeles , C A 90009-200 7 TEL ; 310-725-710 5 FAX : 310-725-681 6 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodw'm , Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Lega l Assistan t FAX : 202-366-753 6

Service vva s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r service i n perso n o r b y expedite dcourier, use th

e followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio n Administration , 60

0 Independence Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington , D C 20591 ; Allenlion : Hearin g Docke t Clerk, AGC-430 .

- 9 -
§ 253.24 Enforcement violations and adverse actions. ( a ) *Compliance with applicable law.* All applicants and Program participants shall comply with applicable law.
( b ) *Applicant disqualification.* ( 1 ) Any issuance of any citation or Notice of Violation and Assessment by NMFS enforcement or other enforcement authority may constitute grounds for the Program to: ( i ) Delay application or approval processing;
( ii ) Delay loan closing;
( iii ) Delay disbursement of loan proceeds;
( iv ) Disqualify an applicant or obligor; or
( v ) Declare default.
( 2 ) The Program will not approve loans or disburse funds to any applicant found to have an outstanding, final and unappealable fisheries fine or other unresolved penalty until either: Such fine is paid or penalty has been resolved; or the applicant enters into an agreement to pay the penalty and makes all payments or installments as they are due. Failure to pay or resolve any such fine or penalty in a reasonable period of time will result in the applicant's disqualification.
( c ) *Foreclosure in addition to other penalties.* In the event that a person with an outstanding balance on a Program loan or guarantee violates any ownership, lease, use, or other provision of applicable law, such person may be subject to foreclosure of property, in addition to any fines, sanctions, or other penalties.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 183 (Thursday, September 21, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 55202]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7916]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Advisory 
Council.
    Date: October 17, 2006.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, Bethesda, MD 
20814.
    Contact Person: Stephen Mockrin, PhD, Director, Division of 
Extramural Research Activities, National Heart, Lung, and Blood 
Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 
435-0466, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#375a58545c5e594477595f5b555e19595e5f19505841"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="335e5c50585a5d40735d5b5f515a1d5d5a5b1d545c45">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/meetings/index.htm, where an agenda 
and any additional information for the meeting will be posted when 
available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 13, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-7916 Filed 9-20-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-11216

__________________

THE HERTZ CORPORATION;

RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

versus

BEATRIZ PAP; SANTA RIVERA;

SABINO SALAZAR; MANUEL GARCIA

VELAZQUEZ; BRAULIA HERNANDEZ

VELAZQUEZ; ESPERANZA FLORES

MORALES,Individually; ESPERANZA

FLORES MORALES, As Representative

of the Estate of Jose Medina, Deceased,

Defendants-Appellants.

______________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Texas

(4:93-CV-518-Y)

______________________________________________

September 11, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Defendants-appellants appeal from an adverse summary judgment

entered in favor of plaintiffs-appellees on their action for
1 The appellants' claim that the judgment of the district court

was premature was not pursued in the district court. In any event,

the claim is frivolous and has been rejected by this court. See

Western Heritage Insurance Co. v. River Entertainment, 998 F.2d

311, 315 (5th Cir. 1993).

2

declaratory judgment. After carefully reviewing the arguments,

briefs and record on appeal, we find no merit to the claims made on

appeal and affirm essentially for the reasons contained in the

district court's comprehensive opinion. See The Hertz Corp. et al.

v. Pap, et al., No. 4:93-CV518X (N.D.Tex. Dec. 14, 1995).1

AFFIRMED.
# EUR-Lex - 11957E065 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957E065

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY, PART TWO - FOUNDATIONS OF THE COMMUNITY, TITLE III - FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS, SERVICES AND CAPITAL, CHAPTER 3: SERVICES, ARTICLE 65 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 65

AS LONG AS RESTRICTIONS ON FREEDOM TO PROVIDE SERVICES HAVE NOT BEEN ABOLISHED , EACH MEMBER STATE SHALL APPLY SUCH RESTRICTIONS WITHOUT DISTINCTION ON GROUNDS OF NATIONALITY OR RESIDENCE TO ALL PERSONS PROVIDING SERVICES WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE FIRST PARAGRAPH OF ARTICLE 59 .
# EUR-Lex - 11957A160 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957A160

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY ( E.A.E.C. - EURATOM ), TITLE THREE - PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INSTITUTIONS, CHAPTER I: THE INSTITUTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY, SECTION IV: THE COURT OF JUSTICE, ARTICLE 160 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 160

THE STATUTE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE IS LAID DOWN IN A SEPARATE PROTOCOL .

THE COURT OF JUSTICE SHALL ADOPT ITS RULES OF PROCEDURE . THESE SHALL REQUIRE THE UNANIMOUS APPROVAL OF THE COUNCIL .
# EUR-Lex - 11992M/PRO/SEBC/05 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11992M/PRO/SEBC/05

**Treaty on European Union - Protocol on the statute of the european system of central banks and of the European Central Bank - Chapter II: Objectifs and tasks of the ESCB - Article 5: Collection of statistical information **

*
Official Journal C 191 , 29/07/1992 P. 0069 *

Article 5

Collection of statistical information

5.1. In order to undertake the tasks of the ESCB, the ECB, assisted by the national central banks, shall collect the necessary statistical information either from the competent national authorities or directly from economic agents. For these purposes it shall cooperate with the Community institutions or bodies and with the competent authorities of the Member States or third countries and with international organizations.

5.2. The national central banks shall carry out, to the extent possible, the tasks described in Article 5.1.

5.3. The ECB shall contribute to the harmonization, where necessary, of the rules and practices governing the collection, compilation and distribution of statistics in the areas within its fields of competence.

5.4. The Council, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 42, shall define the natural and legal persons subject to reporting requirements, the confidentiality regime and the appropriate provisions for enforcement.
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P192The Collaboration Toolkit for Community OrganizationsThe Collaboration Toolkit for Community Organizations is designed to assist community organizations initiate effective partnerships with their law enforcement agencies and collaborate on solving crime problems at the neighborhood level. More specifically, the toolkit outlines how to strengthen partnerships between the community and law enforcement, further the community's role as a partner in crime reduction efforts, identify and address social issues that diminish the quality of life and threaten public safety in communities, and link those in need to services and resources that currently exist in the community.By Michael S. McCampbellCategories: Community Partnerships • Foundations of Community Policing • Police OperationsLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p192Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFBook • Nov 2010Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 05:54 (UTC-5) in 0.19 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
EXHIBIT 32-1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT FUND VI, L.P., SERIES 7 (the “Partnership”) for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.








/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.


Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.


President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.





Date: February 9, 2011
§ 221.43 What are the requirements for written interrogatories? ( a ) *Motion; limitation.* Except upon agreement of the parties: ( 1 ) A party wishing to propound interrogatories must file a motion under § 221.41(c); and
( 2 ) A party may propound no more than 25 interrogatories, counting discrete subparts as separate interrogatories, unless the ALJ approves a higher number upon a showing of good cause.
( b ) *ALJ order.* The ALJ will issue an order under § 221.41(b) with respect to any discovery motion requesting the use of written interrogatories. The order will: ( 1 ) Grant the motion and approve the use of some or all of the proposed interrogatories; or
( 2 ) Deny the motion.
( c ) *Answers to interrogatories.* Except upon agreement of the parties, the party to whom the proposed interrogatories are directed must file its answers to any interrogatories approved by the ALJ within 15 days after issuance of the order under paragraph (b) of this section. ( 1 ) Each approved interrogatory must be answered separately and fully in writing.
( 2 ) The party or its representative must sign the answers to interrogatories under oath or affirmation.
( d ) *Access to records.* A party's answer to an interrogatory is sufficient when: ( 1 ) The information may be obtained from an examination of records, or from a compilation, abstract, or summary based on such records;
( 2 ) The burden of obtaining the information from the records is substantially the same for all parties;
( 3 ) The answering party specifically identifies the individual records from which the requesting party may obtain the information and where the records are located; and
( 4 ) The answering party provides the requesting party with reasonable opportunity to examine the records and make a copy, compilation, abstract, or summary.