alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT (99.1)
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of The Classica Group, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott
G. Halperin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; (2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

/s/ Scott G. Halperin
Scott G. Halperin
Chief Executive Officer
September 4, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of Source Direct Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Dated:  November 19, 2008

/s/ Deren Smith

Name: Deren Smith

Title: Chief Executive and Accounting Officer
#### § 95.349 Network connection.

Operation of Personal Radio Services stations connected with the public switched network is prohibited, unless otherwise allowed for a particular Personal Radio Service by rules in the subpart governing that specific service. *See e.g.,* §§ 95.949 and 95.2749.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 18

- 00335

- CR

Dwight Lamar Wooten Jr.
v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the 18th District Court of Johnson County , Texas Trial Cause No. DC

- F201700717

JUDGMENT
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on
appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court
orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
January 30, 2020
2 

cc: Hon. Connie J. Steinheimer, District Judge 

John Steven Olausen 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A
§ 218.70 Specified activity and geographical region. ( a ) Regulations in this subpart apply only to the U.S. Navy (Navy) for the taking of marine mammals that occurs in the area described in paragraph (b) of this section and that occurs incidental to the activities listed in paragraph (c) of this section.
( b ) The taking of marine mammals by the Navy under this subpart may be authorized in Letters of Authorization (LOAs) only if it occurs within the Hawaii-Southern California Training and Testing (HSTT) Study Area, which includes established operating and warning areas across the north-central Pacific Ocean, from the mean high tide line in Southern California west to Hawaii and the International Date Line. The Study Area includes the at-sea areas of three existing range complexes, the Hawaii Range Complex (HRC), the Southern California Range Complex (SOCAL), and the Silver Strand Training Complex, and overlaps a portion of the Point Mugu Sea Range (PMSR). Also included in the Study Area are Navy pierside locations in Hawaii and Southern California, Pearl Harbor, San Diego Bay, and the transit corridor on the high seas where sonar training and testing may occur.
( c ) The taking of marine mammals by the Navy is only authorized if it occurs incidental to the Navy conducting training and testing activities, including: ( 1 ) *Training.* ( i ) Amphibious warfare;
( ii ) Anti-submarine warfare;
( iii ) Electronic warfare;
( iv ) Expeditionary warfare;
( v ) Mine warfare;
( vi ) Surface warfare; and
( vii ) Pile driving.
( 2 ) *Testing.* ( i ) Naval Air Systems Command Testing Activities;
( ii ) Naval Sea Systems Command Testing Activities;
( iii ) Office of Naval Research Testing Activities; and
( iv ) Naval Information Warfare Systems Command.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>  5


<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                              393,078
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       204,611
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    597,689
<PP&E>                                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      597,689
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     0
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                              1,400
<OTHER-SE>                                          596,289
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        597,689
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          0
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    102,311
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (102,311)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (102,311)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (102,311)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (0.01)




</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Bureau of Industry and Security 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Industry and Security, Department of Commerce. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

5 CFR 430.310 requires agencies to publish notice of Performance Review Board appointees in the                         **Federal Register**                         before their service begins. This notice announces the names of the members of the Bureau of Industry and Security's Performance Review Board.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Gay Shrum, Director of Administration, Bureau of Industry and Security, at (202) 482-1058, Room 6622, Washington, DC 20230. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The purpose of the Performance Review Board is to review and make recommendations to the appointing authority on performance management issues such as appraisals, bonuses, pay level increases, and Presidential Rank Awards for members of the Senior Executive Service. 

The Acting Under Secretary for Industry and Security, Mark Foulon, has named the following executives to be appointed to the Bureau of Industry and Security Performance Review Board: 

1. Matthew Borman, Deputy Under Secretary for Export Administration (new). 

2. Wendy Wysong, Deputy Under Secretary for Export Enforcement (new). 

3. Dawn Leaf, Chief Information Officer (new). 

4. Gay Shrum , Director of Administration (new). 

5. John Phalen, Director, Office of Management and Organization, Department of Commerce (Outside Reviewer new). 

Dated: September 15, 2006. 

Mark Foulon, 

Acting Under Secretary for Industry and Security. 

[FR Doc. 06-7934 Filed 9-20-06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-33-P
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5220 Received in Senate (RDS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5220

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 7 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To provide for the acceptance by the Secretary of Education of 
  applications submitted by the local educational agency serving the 
   Window Rock Unified School District, Window Rock, Arizona, under 
   section 3 of the Act of September 30, 1950 (Public Law 874, 81st 
               Congress) for fiscal years 1994 and 1995.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPLICATION BY WINDOW ROCK, ARIZONA, LOCAL EDUCATIONAL 
              AGENCY FOR FUNDING UNDER SECTION 3 OF PUBLIC LAW 874, 
              81ST CONGRESS.

    Notwithstanding section 5(a)(2) of the Act of September 30, 1950 
(Public Law 874, 81st Congress; 20 U.S.C. 240(a)(2)) (as such section 
was in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of the 
Improving America's Schools Act of 1994), the Secretary of Education 
shall accept from the local educational agency serving the Window Rock 
Unified School District, Window Rock, Arizona, applications for funding 
under section 3 of the Act of September 30, 1950 (as so in effect) for 
fiscal years 1994 and 1995 as if such applications were timely received 
in accordance with section 222.10(a)(1) of title 34, Code of Federal 
Regulations.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 7, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Order entered June 28, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 00309
- CV DOROTHY ROBERSON, Appellant

V. VILLAS TENISON PARK, Appellee On Appeal from the County Co urt at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 18
- 01000
- D



### O RDER On May 29, 2018, after being informed by court reporter Coral L. Wahlen that no party had requested the reporter’s record be prepared, we directed appellant to file written v erification she had requested the record. We cautioned appellant that failure to comply within ten days could result in the appeal being submitted without the reporter’s record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(c). To date, appellant has not complied. Accordin gly, we ORDER the appeal submitted without the reporter’s record. See id. As the clerk’s record has been filed, we ORDER appellant’s brief be filed no later than July 30, 2018.
/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
No. 11-5374.

#### Edwards *v.*Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision.

Ct. App. Ore. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION
      1350)**




--------------------------------------------------------------------




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of ECash, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Chermak,
      Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)       
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)       
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.




Registrant
              Date:
                August 14, 2007
            
            *ECash,
                Inc.*
              *By:
                /s/ Michael Chermak*Michael
                ChermakChairman,
                President Chief Executive Officer (Principle Executive
                Officer)
Editorial Note on Part 622
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 622 appear at 79 FR 57837, Sept. 26, 2014 and at 81 FR 32253, May 23, 2016.

§ 622.30 Required fishing gear. For a person on a vessel to fish for Gulf reef fish in the Gulf EEZ, the following fishing gear must be on the vessel and such person must use the gear as specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section. ( a ) *Non-stainless steel circle hooks.* Non-stainless steel circle hooks are required when fishing with natural baits, except that other non-stainless steel hook types may be used when commercial fishing for yellowtail snapper with natural baits in an area south of a line extending due west from 25°09′ N. lat. off the west coast of Monroe County, Florida, to the Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic inter-council boundary, specified in § 600.105(c).
( b ) *Dehooking device.* At least one dehooking device is required and must be used to remove hooks embedded in Gulf reef fish with minimum damage. The hook removal device must be constructed to allow the hook to be secured and the barb shielded without re-engaging during the removal process. The dehooking end must be blunt, and all edges rounded. The device must be of a size appropriate to secure the range of hook sizes and styles used in the Gulf reef fish fishery.
( c ) *Gear required by the DESCEND Act of 2020.* For a person on a vessel to fish for Gulf reef fish in the Gulf EEZ, a descending device or a venting tool that is rigged and ready for use while fishing is occurring must be on the vessel. The requirements in this paragraph (c) are effective until January 14, 2026. ( 1 ) *Descending device.* A descending device is an instrument capable of releasing a fish at the depth from which the fish was caught. ( i ) The descending device must be a weighted hook, lip clamp, or container that will hold the fish while it is lowered to depth. The device must be capable of releasing the fish automatically, by actions of the operator of the device, or by allowing the fish to escape on its own when at depth.
( ii ) The descending device must use a minimum of a 16-ounce (454-gram) weight and a minimum of a 60-ft (15.2-m) length of line.
( 2 ) *Venting tool.* A venting tool is a device capable of penetrating the abdomen of a fish to release the excess gases accumulated in the body cavity when a fish is retrieved from depth. A venting tool must be a sharpened, hollow instrument that allows air to escape, such as a hypodermic syringe with the plunger removed. A 16-gauge needle, which has an outside diameter of 0.065 inches (1.65 mm), is the minimum diameter hollow tube that must be used. A larger diameter hollow needle is preferred to allow more air to escape from a fish rapidly. A device that is not hollow, such as a knife or an ice pick, is not a venting tool and will cause additional damage to a fish.
[78 FR 22952, Apr. 17, 2013, as amended at 78 FR 46822, Aug. 2, 2013; 81 FR 10311, Feb. 10, 2017; 87 FR 2357, Feb. 14, 2022]
OSLDPS INFORMATION BULLETIN

No. 37 June 27, 2001

TO: All State Administrative Agency Heads

All State Administrative Agency Points of Contact

FROM: C.H. “Butch” Straub II

Director

SUBJECT: State and Local Domestic Preparedness Support Helpline (1-800-368-6498)

The Office for State and Local Domestic Preparedness Support (OSLDPS) is pleased to announce

the recent activation of the State and Local Domestic Preparedness Support Helpline. Initially

developed by the Department of Defense (DoD) as a chemical biological Helpline for first

responders nationwide under the Nunn-Lugar-Domenici (NLD) Domestic Preparedness Program,

the Department of Justice (DOJ), through OSLDPS, is continuing and enhancing the information

available through this service. 

The Helpline, a non-emergency resource, is staffed weekdays from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. eastern

standard time. On weekends, holidays and after business hours, callers can leave a voice mail

message. By just dialing 1-800-368-6498, you can speak with a dedicated operator ready to

provide general information on all of the OSLDPS programs, as well as specific information on the

characteristics and control of WMD materials, defensive equipment, mitigation techniques and

available federal assets. 

Attached is a copy of State and Local Domestic Preparedness Support Helpline Fact Sheet,

providing further information regarding this service. 

Attachment
p.1 

OAR Box 1415 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

3) IV-E-3 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/15/2008 9:38:25 AM Sheet 3 of 130 
P.2 

MEMORANDUM 

TO: Reinforced Plastic Composites NESHAP Docket 

FROM: Keith Barnett 

EPA/OAQPS/ESD/MICG 

DATE: November 16, 2001 

PA f\\r~ ^r-Ai' 

SUBJECT: Minutes of November 16, 2001 Meeting Between EPA and a representative ofthe 

Reinforced Plastic Composites Industry 

LOCATION: EPA Building, research Triangle Park, NC 1:30 pm - 2:30 pm 

ATTENDEES: 

Mr. Marc L. Fleischaker 

Mr. Keith Barnett 

Arent Fox representing 

Masco Corporporation 

EPA/ESD/MICG 

(202) 857-6053 

(919) 541-5605 

PURPOSE 

The purpose ofthe meeting was for Mr. Fleischaker to discuss the current thinking of EPA 

on add-on controls for the reinforced plastic composites industry. 

DISCUSSION 

The EPA representative discussed the history of this NESHAP and how we got to this current 

position. The issue ofthe 112(j) hammer date was discussed, and EPA gave a brief description of 

what would happen at that time. PEA also referred Mr. Fleischaker to a recently published EPA 

proposed rule concerning 112(j). 

The next steps in the rulemaking were discussed, and the process that EPA would go through 

in decision making. This included review of comments and revisions to the add-on control costs. 

Then the cost effectiveness numbers would be recalculated and reviewed. The decision on add-on 

controls would be based on these revised costs. An economic analysis will also be performed based 

on revised costs and will also be used in the decision on the add-on control option. 

A potential option based on pollution prevention (P2) that was considered but could not be 

included in the proposed rule was also discussed. This option could not be included because it was 

not believed to meet the level that had been determined as MACT. The EPA representative stated 

that the Agency was still interested in trying to develop a P2 alternative to the 95 percent control 
P.3 

requirement, but was constrained by the fact that we had deemed 95 percent emission reduction as 

MACT and there was no known P2 option that could achieve this level of control.
Home
About
2020 Federal View Point Survey Results
	About DTIC
	Administrator
	Announcements
	Contact Us
	DTIC’s Past and Future
	DTIC Strategic Plan
	Employment
	Sitemap
Products & Services
DTIC’s Products & Services
	DTIC Registration Benefits
	DTIC Combatant Command (CCMD) Classified Reading Room
	Training
Submit Documents
Sign In
Operating Status
 Defense Technical Information Center
				*Search this site, DoD S&T Reports, and more..*

**Internet Explorer Users:** It is recommended that you use the Google Chrome or Microsoft Edge browser for an optimal experience with this application as Microsoft’s support for Internet Explorer is ending.
	DISMISS Changes are coming to the R&E Gateway Search tool!
		March 27, 2019New Search tool coming soon!
		
			
	
	Did you know?
Back to DTIC Notifications
 Recent Posts
		DTIC Journal Article Is Published
											April 16, 2021
											DTIC publishes special edition of peer-reviewed scientific journal JDR&E
											November 12, 2020
											CUI marking framework guidance now available.
											November 10, 2020
											EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY: New submission requirements for DoD-funded journal articles
											September 24, 2020
											House Appropriations Committee Report on the Defense Appropriations Act for FY2021
											July 21, 2020 Archives
			April 2021
	November 2020
	September 2020
	July 2020
	February 2020
	January 2020
	December 2019
	September 2019
	August 2019
	June 2019
	April 2019
	March 2019
	February 2019
	January 2019
	September 2018
	August 2018
	July 2018
	January 2018
	February 2017
 **DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER**
8725 John J. Kingman Road
Fort Belvoir, Virginia 22060-6218
(800) 225-3842https://Discover.DTIC.mil
			AdministratorContact UsDoD Privacy ProgramEEOEmploymentFOIAInformation Analysis Centers
			Information QualityLegalMission StatementNo FEAR ActOpen GovernmentPlain Language
			Policy MemorandaPrivacy PolicySAPRStrategic PlanSubmit DocumentsUSA.govUSD(R&E)
			LinkedIn

NOTICE:  The appearance of hyperlinks does not constitute endorsement by the DTIC of non-U.S. Government sites or the information, products, or services contained therein.  Although the DTIC may or may not use these sites as additional distribution channels for Department of Defense information, it does not exercise editorial control over all of the information that you may find at these locations.  Such hyperlinks are provided consistent with the stated purpose of this website. The DTIC bears no responsibility for the accuracy, legality or content of the external website or for that of subsequent links. Contact the external website for answers to questions regarding its content. Please let us know about existing external links which you believe are inappropriate.
#### § 80.967 Antenna system.

The antenna must be omnidirectional, vertically polarized and located as high as practicable on the masts or superstructure of the vessel.
#### § 260.77 Fees for score sheets.

If the applicant for inspection service requests score sheets showing in detail the inspection of each container or sample inspected and listed thereon, such score sheets may be furnished by the inspector in charge of the office of inspection serving the area where the inspection was performed; and such applicant shall be changed at the rate of $2.75 for each 12 sampled units, or fraction thereof, inspected and listed on such score sheets.