alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 184 (Friday, September 22, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 55543]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8063]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 5557]


Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation; Extension 
of Waiver of Missile Proliferation Sanctions Against Chinese Government 
Activities

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A determination has been made to extend the waiver of import 
sanctions against certain activities of the Chinese government that was 
announced on September 19, 2003, pursuant to the Arms Export Control 
Act, as amended.

DATES: Effective Date: September 13, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Durham, Office of Missile Threat 
Reduction, Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation, 
Department of State (202-647-4931).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A determination was made on March 13, 2006, 
pursuant to section 73(e) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 
2797b(e)) that it was essential to the national security of the United 
States to waive for a period of six months the import sanction 
described in section 73(a)(2)(C) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 
U.S.C. 2797b(a)(2)(C)) against the activities of the Chinese government 
described in section 74(a)(8)(B) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 
U.S.C. 2797c(a)(8)(B))--i.e., activities of the Chinese government 
relating to the development or production of any missile equipment or 
technology and activities of the Chinese government affecting the 
development or production of electronics, space systems or equipment, 
and military aircraft (see Federal Register Vol. 68, No. 182, Friday, 
September 19, 2003). This action was effective on March 18, 2006.
    On September 13, 2006, a determination was made pursuant to section 
73(e) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2797b(e)) that it is 
essential to the national security of the United States to extend the 
waiver period for an additional six months, effective from the date of 
expiration of the previous waiver (September 18, 2006).
    These measures shall be implemented by the responsible agencies as 
provided in Executive Order 12851 of June 11, 1993.

    Dated: September 18, 2006.
Patricia A. McNerney,
Acting Assistant Secretary of State for International Security and 
Nonproliferation, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 06-8063 Filed 9-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-27-P
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Hollinger International Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements No. 333-17111, 333-84868, 333-82356 and 333-75536 on Form S-3 and
No. 33-88810 on Form S-8 of Hollinger International Inc. of our report dated
March 17, 2003 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Hollinger
International Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss),
stockholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2002, which report appears in the December 31, 2002
annual report on Form 10-K of Hollinger International Inc.

Our report refers to the Companys adoption of the provisions of Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets, as of January 1, 2002.

Our report states that the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31,
2001 and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive
income (loss), stockholders equity and cash flows for the years ended December
31, 2001 and 2000 have been restated.



/s/ KPMG LLP





March 31, 2003
Chicago, Illinois
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5108 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5108

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 5 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

                                Received

            October 8 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
            To extend the Export Administration Act of 1979.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 20 of the 
Export Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 2419) is amended by 
striking ``August 20, 1994'' and inserting ``September 30, 1995''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 4, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# EUR-Lex - 12002M018 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002M018

**Treaty on European Union (Nice consolidated version) - Title V: Provisions on a common foreign and security policy - Article 18 - Article J.8 - EU Treaty (Maastricht 1992) - **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0016 - 0017 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0159 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 191 , 29/07/1992 P. 0060 *

Treaty on European Union (Nice consolidated version)

Title V: Provisions on a common foreign and security policy

Article 18

Article J.8 - EU Treaty (Maastricht 1992)

Article 18

1. The Presidency shall represent the Union in matters coming within the common foreign and security policy.

2. The Presidency shall be responsible for the implementation of decisions taken under this title; in that capacity it shall in principle express the position of the Union in international organisations and international conferences.

3. The Presidency shall be assisted by the Secretary-General of the Council who shall exercise the function of High Representative for the common foreign and security policy.

4. The Commission shall be fully associated in the tasks referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2. The Presidency shall be assisted in those tasks if need be by the next Member State to hold the Presidency.

5. The Council may, whenever it deems it necessary, appoint a special representative with a mandate in relation to particular policy issues.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER O N M OTION

Appellate case name: In the Interest of R

. J

., A Child

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 8

- 00 729

- CV

Trial court case number: CV29910

Trial court: 3 4 4 th District Court of Chambe rs County

This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment in a suit in which the termination of the parent

- child relationship is at issue (“parental termination case”) for both the father, R. J., Sr., and the mother, E. M. On Octo ber 1 , 201 8

, appellant R. J., Sr. ’s counsel

, William B. Connolly

, filed his appellant’s brief. This Court’s October 5, 2018 Order directed appellant R.J., Sr. ’s counsel to file an amended brief, which he did on October 9, 2018

. To date, appellant E.M. has yet to file a brief. On the date that it was due, October 22, 2018, appellee, Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, filed an extension of time to file its brief until Novem ber 12, 2018. Appeals in parental termination cases are to be brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed

, so far as reasonably possible

. See T EX

. S T

. J UD

. A DMIN

. R. 6.2(a) (West 201 7 ). Here, the first notice of appeal was timely filed on A ugust 1 0 , 2018, in the trial court from the August 6 , 2018 final decree for termination b y appointed counsel for the mother, E. M., set ting the 180

- day compliance deadline for February 6 , 201 9

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.1(b). Although appell ee ’s motion is unopposed

, the accelerated schedule in termination cases requires greater compliance with briefing deadlines and greater scrutiny of extensions

. Appell ee’ s counsel contends that an extension is needed because he filed briefs in two other cases and the records in this case a re voluminous, entailing three volumes of the clerk’s record, two volumes of the supplemental clerk’s record, and five volumes of the reporter’s record

. According ly

, appell ee ’s motion for an extension of time to file appell ee ’s brief is GRANTED until November 12, 201 8 , but no further extensions will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 4.1(a), 38.6(d).

It is so ORDERED. Judge’s signature: /s/ L a ura C. Higley

☒ Acting individually Acting for the Court Date: October 23 , 2018
EXHIBIT
31.1








CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,Jason Smart, certify
that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Medical Makeover Corporation of
America;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;





3.  Based  on
my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;





4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and we have:





a.  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or
caused  such disclosure  controls and  procedures
to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure
that  material  information  relating to
the  registrant,  including  its consolidated
subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;


b.
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the
effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and
procedures,  as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly
report based on such evaluation; and


c.
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over  financial  reporting  that
occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent
fiscal  quarter  that  has  materially  affected,  or
is  reasonably  likely  to materially affect, the
registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and





5. I
have  disclosed,  based on our most
recent  evaluation of internal  control over financial
reporting,  to the registrant's  auditors and the audit
committee of the  registrant's  board of directors (or
persons  performing  the equivalent functions):





a.
all significant  deficiencies  and
material  weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal  control
over  financial  reporting,  which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and


b.
any fraud,  whether or not material,  that
involves  management or other employees who have a significant role in
the registrant's  internal control over financial
reporting.





Date:
August 14, 2009


/s/ Jason Smart


Jason Smart


Chief Executive Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ONE 1994 BMW 325, VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (VIN) WBABF4323REK13663, Defendant, and Andres Martinez, Jr., Claimant-Appellant.

No. 03-56183.

D.C. No. CV-01-05245-MMM.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 10, 2004.*

Decided May 20, 2004.

*794Steven R. Welk, USLA — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Andres Martinez, Jr., North Las Vegas, NV, pro se.

Before CANBY, KOZINSKI, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Andres Martinez, Jr. appeals pro se the district court’s default judgment in the government’s civil forfeiture action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion the district court’s decision whether to enter a default judgment, *Aldabe v. Aldabe,*616 F.2d 1089, 1092-1093 (9th Cir.1980), and we affirm.

Martinez does not dispute that he failed to file an answer or claim with the district court. Accordingly, the district court properly rejected Martinez’s opposition to the government’s motion for default judgment because his “failure to comply with the applicable filing requirements precluded his standing as a ‘party’ to the action.” *United States v. Real Property,*135 F.3d 1312,1317 (9th Cir.1998).

Martinez’s remaining contentions lack merit. Martinez’s March 1, 2004 motion to file an oversized brief is denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
https://www.fws.gov/program/national-survey-fishing-hunting-and-wildlife-associated-recreation-fhwar/past-fhwar-surveys
Final Regulation Order – Part 4 

ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING REQUIREMENTS 

Amend Title 13, Motor Vehicles, Division 3, Air Resources Board, Chapter 1, 

Motor Vehicle Pollution Control Devices, Article 1, General Provisions, § 1962.1, 

Electric Vehicle Charging Requirements to read: 

§ 1962.1.2. Electric Vehicle Charging Requirements 

(a) Applicability. This section applies to (1) all battery electric vehicles that qualify 

for 1.0 or greater ZEV credit under section 1962, and (2) all hybrid electric 

vehicles that are capable of being recharged by a battery charger that transfers 

energy from the electricity grid to the vehicle for purposes of recharging the 

vehicle traction battery, other than battery electric vehicles and hybrid electric 

vehicles that are only capable of Level 1 charging.

(b) Definitions. 

(1) The definitions in section 1962 apply to this section. 

(2) "Level 1 charging" means a charging method that allows an electric vehicle or 

hybrid electric vehicle to be charged by having its charger connected to the most 

common grounded receptacle (NEMA 5-15R). A vehicle that is only capable of 

Level 1 charging is one that is charged by an on-board or off-board charger 

capable of accepting energy from the existing AC supply network. The maximum 

power is 12 amps, with a branch circuit rating of 15 amps, and continuous power 

of 1.44 kilowatts. 

(c) Requirements. Beginning with the 2006 model year, all vehicles identified in 

subsection (a) must be equipped with a conductive charger inlet port which 

meets all the specifications contained in Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) 

Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice SAE J1772 REV NOV 2001, SAE 

Electric Vehicle Conductive Charger Coupler, which is incorporated herein by 

reference. All such vehicles must be equipped with an on-board charger with a 

minimum output of 3.3 kilovolt amps. 

Note: Authority cited: Sections 39600, 39601, 43013, 43018, 43101, 43104 and 

43105, Health and Safety Code. Reference: Sections 39002, 39003, 39667, 

43000, 43009.5, 43013, 43018, 43100, 43101, 43101.5, 43102, 43104, 43105, 

43106, 43107, 43204 and 43205.5, Health and Safety Code.
# EUR-Lex - 11957A121 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957A121

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY ( E.A.E.C. - EURATOM ), TITLE THREE - PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INSTITUTIONS, CHAPTER I: THE INSTITUTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY, SECTION II: THE COUNCIL, ARTICLE 121 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 121

THE COUNCIL SHALL ADOPT ITS RULES OF PROCEDURE .

THESE RULES OF PROCEDURE MAY PROVIDE FOR THE SETTING UP OF A COMMITTEE CONSISTING OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE MEMBER STATES . THE COUNCIL SHALL DETERMINE THE TASK AND POWERS OF THAT COMMITTEE .
<PAGE>
 
                 EXHIBIT 23.1 - CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
                 ----------------------------------------------

We consent to the incorporation by reference, in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-94450) pertaining to the 1991 Stock Option Plan of Plasma &
Materials Technologies, Inc. of our report dated February 26, 1997, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of Trikon Technologies, Inc. included
in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Trikon Technologies, Inc. for the year
ended December 31, 1996.

                                /s/ ERNST & YOUNG
                                Chartered Accountants
                                 Registered Auditor
 
 
Woodland Hills, California
April 11, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           9,260
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,499
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,657)
<INVENTORY>                                     23,870
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,594
<PP&E>                                          25,175
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,035)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  79,690
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          115,308
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     19,349
<COMMON>                                       137,767
<OTHER-SE>                                   (202,059)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    79,690
<SALES>                                         55,609
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                85,109
<CGS>                                           61,974
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  182,240
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (11,394)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (108,525)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (9,248)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (99,277)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (6.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (6.71)
        

</TABLE>
§ 18.89 Oral and written arguments. ( a ) The presiding officer may, in his discretion, provide for oral argument by parties at the end of the hearing. Such argument, when permitted, may be limited by the presiding officer to the extent necessary for the expeditious disposition of the proceeding.
( b ) The presiding officer shall announce at the hearing a reasonable period of time within which any party may file with the presiding officer proposed findings and conclusions and written arguments or briefs, which are based upon the record and citing where practicable the relevant page or pages of the transcript. If a party filing a brief desires the presiding officer to reconsider any objection made by such party to a ruling of the presiding officer, he shall specifically identify such rulings by reference to the pertinent pages of the transcript and shall state his arguments thereon as a part of the brief.
( c ) Oral or written arguments shall be limited to issues arising from direct testimony on the record.
# EUR-Lex - 11957E/PRO/BEI/29 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957E/PRO/BEI/29

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY, PROTOCOL ON THE STATUTE OF THE EUROPEAN INVESTMENT BANK, ARTICLE 29 **

*

*

++++

Article 29

Disputes between the Bank on the one hand , and its creditors , debtors or any other person on the other , shall be decided by the competent national courts , save where jurisdiction has been conferred on the Court of Justice .

The Bank shall have an address for service in each Member State . It may , however , in any contract , specify a particular address for service or provide for arbitration .

The property and assets of the Bank shall not be liable to attachment or to seizure by way of execution except by decision of a court .
#### § 90.439 Inspection of stations.

All stations and records of stations in these services shall be made available for inspection at any reasonable time and any time while the station is in operation upon reasonable request of an authorized representative of the Commission.
### Background Summary Data for Agricultural Uses of FGD Gypsum (EPA 530-F-08-009)

Table 1: Comparing Trace Constituents in FGD an d Mined Gypsums to National Background Levels Trace Constituent FGD Gypsum (ppm) Mined Gypsum (ppm) National Background Soil Levels (ppm) a Antimony 2.0 – 9.1 0.02 – 0.28 <1 – 8.8 Arsenic 0.6 – 4.0 0.19 – 3.0 <0.1 - 97 Cadmium 0.2 – 1.2 All <2 0.05 – 8.2 Chromium 1.3 – 42.0 8.7 – 30.5 1 – 2,000 Copper 1.2 – 27.9 <4 – 29.8 <1 - 700 Lead 0.8 – 12.0 All <5 <10 - 700 Lithium <9 and 48.8 b <9 – 13.1 <5 – 140 Mercury 0.01 – 1.4 0.00044 – 0.025 <0.01 – 4.6 Molybdenum 0.5 – 12.0 All <3 <3 – 15 Nickel 0.73 – 20.1 <4 – 11.9 <5 – 700 Selenium 2.0 – 30.0 11.3 – 21.1 <0.1 – 4.3 Thallium 0.6 – 2.3 All <15 0.02 – 1.6 Vanadium <1 – 73.2 <2 – 12.7 <7 – 500 Zinc 3.4 – 47.5 13.1 – 27.5 <5 – 2,900

a All background soil data drawn from USGS (2005)

b Only two samples were available Sources: Ladwig (2007), OSU (2006), Schroeder (2007), USEPA (2008), USGS (2005)

Table 2: Selected macro- and micronutrients and minerals of note Constituent FGD Gypsum (% by weight) Mined Gypsum (% by weight) Boron <0.0003 – 0.0042 Not available Calcium 18.5 – 24.3 18.1 – 21.3 Iron 0.026 – 0.3 0.038 – 0.74 Magnesium 0.010 – 0.74 0.1 – 3.14 Phosphorus 0.0005 – 0.05 0.35 – 0.046 Potassium <0.004 – 0.09 0.0076 – 0.44 Silicon 0.022 – 69.2 Not available Sodium 0.023 – 5.8 0.35 – 0.076 Sulfur 14.9 – 20.9 12.3 – 17 Sources: Ladwig (2007), OSU (2006), Schroeder (2007)

Sources: Ladwig, Ken (2007) Electric Power Research Institute. Personal communication. OSU (2006) Ohio State University Extension Fact Sheet "Gypsum for Agricultural Use in Ohio--Sources and Quality of Available Products." one datapoint for asse ssed constituents. ANR-20- 05. Downloaded 8/2007 at http://ohioline.osu.edu/anr-fact/0020.html

. Schroeder, Karl (2007) US Department of Energy, Nation al Energy Technology Laboratory. July 2007. Personal communication. USEPA (2008) - Characterization of Coal Combustion Resi dues from Electric Utilities Using Wet Scrubbers for Multi-Pollutant Control. Office of Research & Development. July. EPA/600/ R-08/077. Available at http://www.epa.gov/nrm rl/pubs/600r08077/600r08077.htm USGS. 2005. Major- and Trace-Element Concentrations in Soils from Two Continental-Scale Transects of the United States and Canada. Open-File Report 2005-1253. Accessed on September 13, 2007. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2005/1253/



### .