alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXOMA DRONE AND RESCUE - FLIGHT AUTHORIZATION FORM

MISSION INFORMATION: Date:______________________________

REQUESTOR ________________________________________________________________

ADDRESS:______________________________ CITY__________________ STATE________

PHONE:______________________ EMAIL:________________________________________

I (requestor)_______________________________ request the services provided by Texoma 

Drone and Rescue for this UAS Flight. To my knowledge, and after safety discussions with 

TD&R this area is safe to fly an UAS. The assigned mission is for informational or recreational 

purposes only. This mission is not intended to invade private property or intrude on personal 

privacy. 

Signature of Requestor ________________________________________________________

FLIGHT CHECK:

__ Authorized for Flight __ Safety Vest and Devices in Place __Check Wind

__ Props tightened and good condition __ Cameras & Sensors Secure

__Flight Battery Secured %___________ __Area Safe to Fly __Optics / Monitors Working 

__ Connect all batteries __Switches Correct Location on TX __ Calibrate Compass

__ Proper GPS Signal __Reset Timer ___ Start Motors

Pilot Signature: ____________________________________________________________

TYPE OF FLIGHT ACTIVITY / LOCATION AIRCRAFT

RESCUE S900

FIRE PHANTOM 2 VISION PLUS

SURVEILLANCE INSPIRE 1

REALASTATE PHANTOM 3

AGRICULTURE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       5,318,259
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               38,510,407
<ALLOWANCES>                                   120,175
<INVENTORY>                                    330,366
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            49,903,488
<PP&E>                                      39,785,489
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,479,337
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             146,846,834
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       31,829,036
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       247,107
<OTHER-SE>                                  59,179,096
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               146,846,834
<SALES>                                    156,670,233
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           156,670,233
<CGS>                                      107,640,340
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              109,440,340
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                39,829
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,800,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,494,112
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,552,246
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,112,928
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,439,318
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,439,318
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 300
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 300 appear at 64 FR 44431, Aug. 16, 1999, and at 76 FR 59305, Sept. 26, 2011.

§ 300.339 Transshipment on the high seas. ( a ) In addition to any other applicable restrictions on transshipment, including those under parts 300 and 635 of this title, the following requirements apply to transshipments, when authorized, taking place on the high seas: ( 1 ) The owner or operator of a U.S. vessel receiving or offloading fish on the high seas shall provide a notice by fax or email to the Regional Administrator or the Office Director at least 36 hours prior to any intended transshipment on the high seas with the following information: the vessels offloading and receiving the transshipment (names, official numbers, and vessel types); the location (latitude and longitude to the nearest tenth of a degree) of transshipment; date and time that transshipment is expected to occur; and species, processed state, and quantities (in metric tons) expected to be transshipped. If another requirement for prior notice applies, the more restrictive requirement (*i.e.,* a requirement for greater advance notice and/or more specific information regarding vessels, location etc.) must be followed.
( 2 ) U.S. high seas fishing vessels shall report transshipments on the high seas to the Regional Administrator or Office Director within 15 calendar days after the vessel first enters into port, using the form obtained from the Regional Administrator or Office Director. If there are applicable transshipment reporting requirements in other parts of this title, the more restrictive requirement (*e.g.,* a reporting requirement of fewer than 15 calendar days) must be followed.
( b ) [Reserved]
§ 260.81 Readjustment and increase in hourly rates of fees. ( a ) When Federal Pay Act increases occur, the hourly rates for inspection fees will automatically be increased on the effective date of the pay act by an amount equal to the increase received by the average GS grade level of fishery product inspectors receiving such pay increases.
( b ) The hourly rates of fees to be charged for inspection services will be subject to review and reevaluation for possible readjustment not less than every 3 years: *Provided,* That, the hourly rates of fees to be charged for inspection services will be immediately reevaluated as to need for readjustment with each Federal Pay Act increase.
[35 FR 15925, Oct. 9, 1970]
§ 259.6 Termination of inactive and zero balance accounts. ( a ) If a Schedule B objective has not commenced within 10 years from the date the Agreement was established, and has not been extended by written approval of the Secretary, the Agreement is considered inactive and subject to termination.
( b ) If the account balance of all depositories of an Agreement is zero dollars 10 years after the date it was established, and has not been extended through amendment, the Agreement is considered inactive and subject to termination unless its Schedule B objective has commenced.
( c ) A certified letter will be sent to holders of Agreements identified for termination informing them that the agreement will terminate 60 days after the date of the letter unless the deficiencies identified in the letter are addressed.
#### § 27.1500 Scope.

This subpart sets out the regulations governing the licensing and operations of 900 MHz broadband systems operating in the 897.5-900.5/936.5-939.5 MHz band. It includes eligibility requirements and operational and technical standards for stations licensed in this band. It also supplements the rules regarding application procedures contained in part 1, subpart F of this chapter. The rules in this subpart are to be read in conjunction with the applicable requirements contained elsewhere in this part; however, in case of conflict, the provisions of this subpart shall govern with respect to licensing and operation in this frequency band.
#### § 401.22 Civil rights.

Each application for Federal assistance, grant-in-aid award, or project agreement shall be supported by a statement of assurances executed by the Cooperator providing that the project will be carried out in accordance with title VI, Nondiscrimination in federally Assisted Programs of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and with the Secretary's regulations promulgated thereunder.
# EUR-Lex - 11957E061 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957E061

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY, PART TWO - FOUNDATIONS OF THE COMMUNITY, TITLE III - FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS, SERVICES AND CAPITAL, CHAPTER 3: SERVICES, ARTICLE 61 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 61

1 . FREEDOM TO PROVIDE SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF TRANSPORT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE TITLE RELATING TO TRANSPORT .

2 . THE LIBERALISATION OF BANKING AND INSURANCE SERVICES CONNECTED WITH MOVEMENTS OF CAPITAL SHALL BE EFFECTED IN STEP WITH THE PROGRESSIVE LIBERALISATION OF MOVEMENT OF CAPITAL .
2016 COPS Anti-Heroin Task Force Program Awards

State and Agency Name Estimated Award Amount

California

California Department of Justice $1,276,924 

Connecticut

Connecticut Department of Public Safety $1,500,000 

Indiana

Indiana State Police $350,000 

Massachusetts

Massachusetts Department of the Attorney General $1,023,299 

New Jersey

New Jersey Department of Law and Public Safety $1,279,255 

Pennsylvania 

Pennsylvania State Police $300,000 

Total: $5,729,478
§ 600.207 Pacific Fishery Management Council Tribal Indian representative and alternate. ( a ) The tribal Indian representative to the Pacific Fishery Management Council may designate an alternate during the period of the representative's term. The designee must be knowledgeable concerning tribal rights, tribal law, and the fishery resources of the geographical area concerned.
( b ) New or revised designations of an alternate by the tribal Indian representative must be delivered in writing to the appropriate NMFS Regional Administrator and the Council chair at least 48 hours before the designee may vote on any issue before the Council. In that written document, the tribal Indian representative must indicate how the designee meets the knowledge requirements under paragraph (a) of this section.
[75 FR 59151, Sept. 27, 2010]
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

36 38 40 

### ★
▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/19 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 19 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 16 (Wednesday, January 25, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 3772]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-1513]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES

Economic Impact Policy

    This notice is to inform the public that the Export-Import Bank of 
the United States has received an application to support the export of 
approximately $750 million in U.S. petrochemical manufacturing 
equipment and services for the construction of a new petrochemical 
facility in Mexico. The financed amount associated with the U.S. export 
contract, including local cost and interest during construction, is 
expected to total approximately $900 million. Ex-Im Bank may also be 
requested to provide up to $400 million of additional financing should 
a co-financing structure with the Italian ECA materialize.
    The U.S. exports will enable the Mexican petrochemical facility to 
produce approximately 750,000 metric tons of high-density polyethylene 
(HDPE) and 300,000 metric tons of low-density polyethylene (LDPE) 
annually. The Mexican petrochemical producer plans to sell its products 
primarily within Mexico, and also to the U.S., Central America, and 
South America.
    Interested parties may submit comments on this transaction by email 
to economic.impact@exim.gov or by mail to 811 Vermont Avenue NW., Room 
947, Washington, DC 20571, within 14 days of the date this notice 
appears in the Federal Register.

Angela Mariana Freyre,
Senior Vice President and General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2012-1513 Filed 1-24-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
#### § 229.12 Consultation with the Secretary of the Interior.

The Assistant Administrator will consult with the Secretary of the Interior prior to taking actions or making determinations under this part that affect or relate to species or population stocks of marine mammals for which the Secretary of the Interior is responsible under the Act.
No. 11-5246.

#### Gayle *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P140Crime Prevention Research Review No. 2: Police Enforcement Strategies to Prevent Crime in Hot Spot AreasThe second publication in the Crime Prevention Research Review series, this report summarizes the findings from all rigorous academic studies evaluating police enforcement strategies in hot spot areas. It finds that focusing efforts on places with high crime and calls for service can effectively be used to prevent crime in those locations. Reduced calls for service and other reductions in crime and disorder measures were noted in most studies. Displacement of crime due to the enforcement efforts was not prevalent in those studies that measured displacement.By Anthony A. BragaCategories: Data and Analysis • Nonviolent CrimeLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p140Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Aug 2011Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 02:33 (UTC-5) in 0.19 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
###### Editorial Note on Part 648

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 648 appear at 62 FR 14651, Mar. 27, 1997.

#### § 648.129 Protection of threatened and endangered sea turtles.

This section supplements existing regulations issued to regulate incidental take of sea turtles under authority of the Endangered Species Act under 50 CFR parts 222 and 223. In addition to the measures required under those parts, NMFS will investigate the extent of sea turtle takes in flynet gear and, if deemed appropriate, may develop and certify a Turtle Excluder Device for that gear.

[76 FR 60635, Sept. 29, 2011]
#### § 29.41 When does this subpart apply to me?

This subpart applies to you if you are an operator who conducts or proposes to conduct non-Federal oil or gas operations on Service-administered lands or waters outside of Alaska.
#### § 402.43 Interagency exchanges of information.

EPA may convey to the Service a written request for a list of any listed species or critical habitat that may be present in any area that may be affected by a FIFRA action. Within 30 days of receipt of such a request the Service shall advise EPA in writing whether, based on the best scientific and commercial data available, any listed species or critical habitat may be present in any such area. EPA may thereafter request the Service to provide available information (or references thereto) describing the applicable environmental baseline for each species or habitat that EPA determines may be affected by a FIFRA action, and the Service shall provide such information within 30 days of the request.
§ 23.85 What is a meeting of the Conference of the Parties (CoP)? ( a ) *Purpose.* Article XI of the Treaty provides general guidelines for meetings of the countries that have ratified, accepted, approved, or acceded to CITES. The Parties currently meet for 2 weeks every 3 years. At these meetings, the Parties consider amendments to the Appendices and resolutions and decisions to improve the implementation of CITES. The Parties adopt amendments to the lists of species in Appendix I and II and resolutions by a two-thirds majority of Parties present and voting. The Secretariat or any Party may also submit reports on wildlife and plant trade for consideration.
( b ) *CoP locations and dates.* At a CoP, Parties interested in hosting the next meeting notify the Secretariat. The Parties vote to select the location of the next CoP. Once a country has been chosen, it works with the Secretariat to set the date and specific venue. The Secretariat then notifies the Parties of the date for the next CoP.
( c ) *Attendance at a CoP.* All Parties may participate and vote at a CoP. Non-Party countries may participate, but may not vote. Organizations technically qualified in protection, conservation, or management of wildlife or plants may participate in a CoP as observers if they are approved, but they are not eligible to vote. ( 1 ) International organizations must apply to the CITES Secretariat for approval to attend a CoP as an observer.
( 2 ) National organizations must apply to the Management Authority of the country where they are located for approval to attend a CoP as an observer.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

     <ARTICLE> 5
     <MULTIPLIER> 1

     <PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1996

     <PERIOD-TYPE>                                    YEAR

     <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996

     <CASH>                                          26,104

     <SECURITIES>                                         0

     <RECEIVABLES>                                   40,331

     <ALLOWANCES>                                         0

     <INVENTORY>                                          0

     <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,435

     <PP&E>                                       6,015,843

     <DEPRECIATION>                               1,657,420

     <TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,474,386

     <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          101,248

     <BONDS>                                      3,362,229

     <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0

     <PREFERRED>                                          0

     <COMMON>                                        57,503

     <OTHER-SE>                                     953,406

     <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,474,386

     <SALES>                                        196,647

     <TOTAL-REVENUES>                               196,647

     <CGS>                                                0

     <TOTAL-COSTS>                                  584,715

     <OTHER-EXPENSES>                               331,248

     <LOSS-PROVISION>                                 8,150

     <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             342,934

     <INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,070,400)

     <INCOME-TAX>                                         0

     <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0

     <DISCONTINUED>                                       0

     <EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0

     <CHANGES>                                            0

     <NET-INCOME>                                (1,070,400)

     <EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.22)

     <EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.22)


</TABLE>
Unassociated Document


    Exhibit
      4.1

    


    State
      of
      Nevada

    


    
      	
              NUMBER

            	 	
              SHARES

            
	
              XXXX

            	 	
              #####

            


    

    


    PRINCETON
      SECURITY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

    COMMON
      STOCK - PAR VALUE $.001

    


    
      	
              This
                certifies that

            	
              SPECIMEN

            	
              is
                the

            
	
              registered
                holder of

            	 	
              Shares

            


    

    


    transferable
      only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in present or by
      Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.

    


    In
      Witness Whereof, the
      said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized
      officers and its 'Corporate Seal' to be hereunto affixed 

    this
      ________________day of ________________

    


    


    
      	
              President

            	
              corporate
                seal

            	
              Chairman
                of the Board
[Civ. No. 1314.

Third Appellate District.

March 20, 1915.]

#### D. P. NARVAEZ, Respondent, v. BOARD OF POLICE AND FIRE COMMISSIONERS OF SAN JOSE et al., Appellants.

Mandamus—Proceeding for Salary and Reinstatement as Police Officer.—Judgment reversed on the authority of *Eumbwrg*v. *Board of Bolioe and Fire -Commissioners of the City of San Jose, ante,*p. 6.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County and from an order denying a new trial. John E. Richards, and William A. Beasley, Judges.

The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in *Hum-burg*v. *Board of Police mid Fire Commissioners of the City of San Jose, ante,*p. 6.

John W. Sullivan, City Attorney, for Appellants.

J. C. Black, for Respondent.

BURNETT, J.

For the reason stated in the decision filed this day in *Humburg*v. *Board of Police and Fire Commissioners of the City of San Jose et al.,*(Civ. No. 1313), *ante,*p. 6, [148 Pac. 802], the judgment is reversed.

Chipman, P. J., and Hart, J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the district court of appeal on April 19, 1915, and a petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on May 17,1915.