alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 12.36 How do I file a claim to get back my seized property? ( a ) If you receive a notice of seizure and proposed forfeiture, you may file a claim to the property by the deadline stated in the notice of seizure and proposed forfeiture. This deadline will be 35 days after the notice is mailed.
( b ) If you did not receive a notice of seizure and proposed forfeiture, your claim must be received by the appropriate office not later than 30 days from the last date of final publication of the notice of the seizure of the property.
( c ) A claim does not have to be in any particular form, but your claim must: be in writing, identify the specific property being claimed, state your interest in the specific property being claimed, and be made under oath subject to penalty of perjury. We will make a claim form available to you upon request.
( d ) Your claim, by itself, will not entitle you or any other person to possession of the property. No bond is required to make a claim for judicial forfeiture proceedings. Rather, your claim will result in the Service referring the case, through the Solicitor, to the Department of Justice for civil judicial forfeiture. However, if you request possession of the property pending an administrative forfeiture decision under § 12.6, you will be required to post a bond under § 12.6 if your request is granted. This bond is only required to obtain interim possession of the property.
( e ) Your claim must be made under oath by you as the claimant and not by an attorney or agent.
( f ) If you are an individual claimant, you must sign the claim. ( 1 ) If the claimant is a corporation or a form of limited liability business entity organized under a State law, an authorized officer or supervisory employee of the entity must sign the claim.
( 2 ) If the claimant is a partnership or limited partnership, any general partner may sign the claim.
( 3 ) If the claimant is a trust, estate, or fiduciary entity, such as a person to whom property is entrusted, the chief officer authorized by the trust, estate, or fiduciary entity must sign the claim.
###### Editorial Note on Part 300

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 300 appear at 64 FR 44431, Aug. 16, 1999, and at 76 FR 59305, Sept. 26, 2011.

#### § 300.160 Requirement for marking of containers or packages.

Except as otherwise provided in this subpart, all persons are prohibited from importing, exporting, or transporting in interstate commerce any container or package containing any fish or wildlife (including shellfish) unless each container or package is conspicuously marked on the outside with both the name and address of the shipper and consignee and an accurate list of its contents by species and number of each species.
#### § 404.8 Emergencies and law enforcement activities.

The prohibitions in this part do not apply to activities necessary to respond to emergencies threatening life, property, or the environment, or to activities necessary for law enforcement purposes.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet, statement of operations and cash flows and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1996.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           5,060
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,282
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,449
<PP&E>                                           5,885
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,606
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,523
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,814
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,042
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,523
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,070
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,323
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,747
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,945
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,802
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,802
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.28


</TABLE>
2017 COPS Community Policing Development and Microgrant Awards

State and Recipient Award Amount

California

Stockton, City of 

Microgrant: Stockton Police Department’s Safety, Health, Resilience, Endurance 

and Development (SHRED) Program 

$75,000 

Colorado 

Colorado Department of Public Safety

Microgrant: Improving Recruiting and Hiring Practices that Promote Diversity 

through a Barrier Analysis 

$74,620 

National Alliance for Drug Endangered Children 

National Drug Endangered Children (DEC) Online Training Project 

$276,386 

District of Columbia 

Police Executive Research Forum

Expand Officer Safety & Wellness Programming Nationwide through Targeted 

Technical Assistance to Agencies and Practitioner Manual Development 

$300,000 

Police Foundation 

LEO Near Miss: Improving Officer Safety with Local Law Enforcement Agencies 

$99,955 

Illinois

Xero Associates Inc.

Preventing Problems by Promoting Positive Practices Online Course Adaption 

$203,068 

Kentucky

Allen County Sheriff’s Department

Microgrant: Allen County Cares, Reducing Youth Opiate Use

$75,000 

New York

Rochester Police Department

Microgrant: Using Natural Language Processing to Drive Business Intelligence 

and Data Analysis 

$75,000 

North Carolina 

Research Triangle Institute

Developing and Validating Self-Guided Wellness and Stress Management Tools for 

Law Enforcement Agencies

$497,645 
2017 COPS Community Policing Development and Microgrant Awards

State and Recipient Award Amount

Page 2 of 2 

South Dakota

Rapid City Police Department

Microgrant: Rapid City Police Department’s Akicita Native American Law 

Enforcement Recruit Development Program 

$75,000 

Texas 

El Paso County Sheriff’s Department

Microgrant: Building Officer Wellness and Resiliency 

$74,239 

Irving, City of 

Microgrant: City of Irving Mental Health Clinician Project 

$65,315 

Virginia

International Association of Chiefs of Police 

Institute for Community and Police Relations and Discover Policing Website

$292,874 

Virginia Community Policing Institute

Advancing Community Policing through E-Learning 

$400,000 

Virginia Community Policing Institute

COPS E-Learning Portal: Maintenance and Enhancement 

$200,000 

Wisconsin 

Fox Valley Technical College

Community Policing Online Training Development 

$313,487 

Fox Valley Technical College

Tribal Community Policing Training and Technical Assistance Project 

$450,000 

Madison Police Department

Microgrant: Madison Police Department Resiliency Program Implementation 

$39,231 

Total: $3,586,820
#### Long v. Seay, *Appellant.*

Duration of Liability of Sureties on an Official Bond. The sureties on the bond of *an officer, who by*law holds until his successor is elected and qualified, remain liable so long as he continues to hold the office, though that be beyond the term for which he was elected.

*Appeal from Phelps Circuit Court.*— Hon. V. B. Hill, Judge.

Aeeirmed.

*L. F. Parker*for appellant

cited *Welch v.*Seymour, 28 Conn. 887; *Curling v.*Chalklen, 3 Maulé & Sel. 502; *Dedham Bank v.*Chickering, 3 Pick. 335 j *t Chelmsford Co. v.*Demurest, 7 Gray 1; *Arlington v.*Merrieke, 2 Saunders *649404; *Liverpool Water Works v. Atkinson,*6 East 505; *Has-sell v. Long,*2 M. & S. 369 ; *Wardens, St. Saviour v. Bostick,*2 New Rep. 175; *Peppin v. Cooper,*2 B. & Aid. 431; *Hibson v. Julian,*30 Eng. Law & Eq. 326; *Bigeloio v. Bridge,*8 Mass. 275; *People v. Jansen,*7 Johns. 332; *Moss v. State,*10 Mo. 338; *Commissioners v. Greenwood,*1 Dessau 452; *Harris v. Babbitt,*4 Dill. 190; *Cuthbert v. Huggin,*21 Ala. 349 ; *Wagner v. Horn,*2 Harr. (Del.) 190 ; *Lover v. Twombly,*42 N. H.. 59 ; *County of Wapello v. Brigham,*10 Iowa 36; *Mayor of Hahway v. Crowell,*40 N. J. L. 207; *s. c.,*29 Am. 224; 7 Reporter 87.

*L. H. Waters*and *C. C. Bland*for respondent.

Henry, J.

This is a suit by which plaintiff seeks contribution from defendant, his co-security in an official bond executed by E. *W.*Clark, to the board of education of the city of Rolla school corporation, of which he was appointed treasurer in 1873, and continued as such until 1876. The penalty of the bond was $5,000, which plaintiff has paid, Clark being a defaulter in a sum greater than said penalty. Appellant contends that Clark was elected treasurer for one year only, and that the defalcation which occurred in the first year of his service, being less than $1,000, the securities are only liable for that amount.' Eor respondent, it is insisted, that the term of office under the statute was three years; but whether one or three years, he was, by the statute, to hold until his successor should be elected and qualified, and there having been no election within the three years, and Clark continuing to act as treasurer of the board, his securities are liable for his defalcation while he was in office. See *Savings Bank of Hannibal v. Hunt, ante,*p. 597. Appellant’s counsel, in his brief, insists upon no other error, and the judgment is affirmed.

All concur..
_1V0V2 ^ 16;57 FAX 2024935142 FAA ^ DMS 

0001/002 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADIVUNISTRATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

'FPARTMENT OF 

^'.MSPORWION 

::- T OPERATIONS 

^vOV - 8 A 10 01 

In the Matter of NEBO Aviation Services, LLC 

2009EA030038 

{^^\bthol)i2^ J"<^g^ Not Assigned ^^^jQ^ fQ^g 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

Complainant, Federal Aviation Adminisiration, hereby notifies the United Stales 

Department of Transportation, Office of Hearings, and the Respondent, pursuant to 14 

C.F.R. §13.204(b), that it shall be represented in the above-stated action by the attorney 

hstcd below. All communications, notices, pleadings or documents are respectfully 

requested to be forwarded as follows: 

Stephen W.Brice 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of Regional Counsel 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

Telephone: 718 553-3268 

Facsimile: 718 995-5699 

Respectfully submitted, 

Alfred R. Johnson, Jr. 

Regional Coun.<!cl 

By: S ^ Q:^ / /^— , Dated: ^y^ ' '^^: ^t^/^ 

Stephen W. Brice 

Attorney 
11/05/201 0 16:5 7 FAX 202493514 2 FAA •>• DMS 0002/002 

CERTMCATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on this day copies of the foregoing Notice of Appearance were placed 

in the United States mail, postage prepaid, Cerlilled Mail - Return Receipt Requested 

addressed as follows: 

Gregory S. Winton 

Aviation Law Experts , LLC 

One Research Court, Suite 450 

Rockvillc, MD 20850 

Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Atta: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Room 2014 

-IF HLING BY FEDERAL EXPRESS 

Federal Aviation Adnainisnation (Original and one copy) 

600 Independence Avenue, SW 

Wilbur Wright Building - Room 2014 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Date: OCT26 2010 friUL^ 

Mary arm Mignone 

Legal Tecnnician 

Office of Regional Counsel 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434
|  | Community Based Approaches             Contact Us |                     Print                     Version                     Search:                     EPA                     Home > Ecosystems                     >Community Based Approaches > News |
|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| CBEP News Online
CBEP News On-line (CNO) is an electronic newsletter from the EPA Office         of Reinvention published periodically for EPA's Agency CBEP practitioners.         To be added to the distribution list,or to submit contributions including         announcements, comments, or suggestions, please contact Jerry Filbin,         editor, filbin.gerald@epa.gov.         
 

Note: Documents in PDF format are         best viewed in Adobe Acrobat Reader Version 5.0Download         Acrobat Reader
Community Based         Approaches Home
 
EPA Home | Privacy         and Security Notice |         Contact Us

 

  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit








Exhibit 4.1
 


RIDER X


DESCRIPTION OF THE REGISTRANT'S SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED
 
 
As of the April 30, 2020, Champions Oncology, Inc. has authorized capital stock consisting of 200,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share. The following description summarizes the material terms of common stock.


Holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote per share. Our certificate of incorporation, as amended, does not provide for cumulative voting. Holders of our common stock are entitled to receive ratably such dividends, if any, as may be declared by our board of directors out of legally available funds. Upon liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, the holders of our common stock are entitled to share ratably in all of our assets which are legally available for distribution, after payment of our provision for all liabilities.
From: Tom Smitherman tom@smithermanrealty.com 

Subject: 333 Petition 

Date: January 14, 2016 at 5:26PM 

To: 

Floor 

Docket 

Wahington 

Operations 

DC 

M-30; 

20590 

U. S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE. Room W12·140 West Building Ground • 

From: Tom Smitherman <tom@smithermanrealty.com> 

Subject: 333 exemption for Phantom Drone Standard 

Date: January 14,2016 at 5:16:54 PM EST 

To: 333exemptions@taa 

Cc: Tom Smitherman <tsmitherman@yadtel.net> 

To: FAA 

From: Thomas D Smitherman 

Subject: Request for 333 Exemption 

Operators Name and Address: 

Thomas D Smitherman 

1000 Bruce Road 

East Bend, N~ C. 27018 

Request relief fro~ 14 CFR 11.81 

Safety: 

Thomas D. Smitherman will be the Drone operator and comply with all government regulations and assure drone is well maintained and 

operated per manufactures guidance. I (Thomas D. Smitherman) will not infringe upon other persons or their property. I will also assure that 

no flight will be made beyond my eye sight and no altitude above 400 feet. I will stay aware of all weather conditions and not fly at any time 

other than when I can keep TOTAL control of the Drone. 

Public Interest: 

I am a real estate broker who markets mainly large land tracts and commercial properties and occasionally some residential. The Drone 

videos enable an insight into any structure, environmental, topographical, vegetation and infrastructure chararistics that can be very useful 

in planning the best use of said property. Whlle reviewing large tracts of land for farming use, we evaluate soil conditions, water run off, 

streams, tract geometry, and forestation. In my effort to serve the best interest of a seller or buyer, the Drone is very beneficial by providing 

data that cannot be provided without the aerial video. The Drone videos truly helps me provide "full disclosure during any transaction." 

Proposed Operation: 

I (Thomas D. Smitherman) plan to provide video of real estate properties which I have for sale to the general public. I do not intend to 

provide Drone services to others, only for use in my activities. 

Make and Model of Aircraft: 

DJI - Phantom 3 Standard 

Please advise if I need to furnish more information. 

E-Mail: tsmitherman@yadtel.net 

Phone: Off-336-961-3351 

Cell-336-406-7243 

f2_F6 JS/5fl.~
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5079

To amend the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 to authorize appropriations

for fiscal years 1995, 1996, and 1997 for drug abuse education and

prevention for the benefit of youth.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 22, 1994

Mr. MARTINEZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Education and Labor

A BILL

To amend the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 to authorize

appropriations for fiscal years 1995, 1996, and 1997

for drug abuse education and prevention for the benefit

of youth.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DRUG EDUCATION AND PREVENTION RELAT4 ING TO YOUTH GANGS.

5 Section 3505 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988

6 (42 U.S.C. 11805) is amended—

7 (1) by striking ‘‘$16,000,000 for fiscal year

8 1992 and’’, and
2

•HR 5079 IH

1 (2) by striking ‘‘1993 and 1994’’ and inserting

2 ‘‘1995, 1996, and 1997’’.

3 SEC. 2. PROGRAMS FOR RUNAWAY AND HOMELESS YOUTH.

4 Section 3513 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988

5 (42 U.S.C. 11823) is amended—

6 (1) by striking ‘‘$16,000,000 for fiscal year

7 1992 and’’, and

8 (2) by striking ‘‘1993 and 1994’’ and inserting

9 ‘‘1995, 1996, and 1997’’.

Æ
#### § 260.41 Appeal inspection certificate.

After an appeal inspection has been completed, an appeal inspection certificate shall be issued showing the results of such appeal inspection; and such certificate shall supersede the inspection certificate previously issued for the processed product involved. Each appeal inspection certificate shall clearly identify the number and date of the inspection certificate which it supersedes. The superseded certificate shall become null and void upon the issuance of the appeal inspection certificate and shall no longer represent the quality or condition of the processed product described therein. The inspector or inspectors issuing an appeal inspection certificate shall forward notice of such issuance to such persons as he considers necessary to prevent misuse of the superseded certificate if the original and all copies of such superseded certificate have not previously been delivered to the inspector or inspectors issuing the appeal inspection certificate. The provisions in the regulations in this part concerning forms of certificates, issuance of certificates, and disposition of certificates shall apply to appeal inspection certificates, except that copies of such appeal inspection certificates shall be furnished all interested parties who received copies of the superseded certificate.
COPS Office 

Online Training Development 

Specifications & Requirements 

Questions regarding this form? 

Call 833-650-7910 or email 

info@copstrainingportal.org. 

The COPS Office Online Curriculum Standards and Review Process Guide contains specific guidelines on instructional 

design, best practices, and the process by which online training curriculum is reviewed and approved by the COPS Office. 

Please review the Process Guide thoroughly and contact the COPS Office program manager assigned to your award if you 

have questions about online curriculum standards and review. The information below is an overview of some of the 

specifications and requirements which are detailed in the full Process Guide. 

GENERAL BEST PRACTICES

□		 Courses are recommended to be “chunked” into modules of no longer than 30 minutes in length 

□		 All references should be properly cited and compiled in a list that can be shared with course participants 

□		 Assets (images, videos, narration, etc.) should not violate copyright infringement laws 

□		 Text should be no smaller than 8-point (but if designing for mobile, should be 12-point or higher) 

□		 Course file size should be reasonable to avoid long course load time and server stress 

□		 An easily recognizable naming convention should be used when submitting files, such as CourseName_Module#, 

especially if course is multiple modules in length 

REQUIRED PUBLISH SETTINGS 

□		 Course should be published to LMS – SCORM 1.2 

□		 HTML5 output should be provided in anticipation of course being accessed on mobile device 

□		 The report status should be configured to LMS as Passed/Incomplete 

□		 Course should be set to track course final assessment results 

□		 All source files should be provided to expedite minor course edits, services, and publishing updates 

508 COMPLIANCE BEST PRACTICES 

□		 A complete course transcript must be included in the course for screen readers 

□		 Any videos included must be transcribed and transcriptions should be included and accessible 

□		 All on-screen objects should have alt text to describe the component to participants using a screen reader 

□		 Each course developer should designate a 508 compliance point of contact 

REQUIRED ADDITIONAL COURSE COMPONENTS 

□		 A bank of at least 10 questions for a pre- and post-online training assessment of user learning 

□		 Additional evaluation questions beyond the COPS Office required questions (if applicable) 

November 2018