alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 21, 2021

No. 04-20-00477-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF F.B.C.L., B.A.I.L., L.K.A.L., AND J.J.W.L, CHILDREN

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019-PA-01116

Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On October 2, 2020, we ordered appellant to file a response by October 19, 2020 

explaining why she failed to file her pro se notice of appeal in a timely manner. In that order, we 

explained that her notice of appeal had been due by September 8, 2020, and our records showed 

that she had filed a pro se notice of appeal on September 16, 2020—within the fifteen-day grace 

period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 

959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26). We further explained 

that without a reasonable explanation setting out why she failed to file her notice of appeal in a 

timely manner, the appeal would be dismissed. See id.; TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3, 42.3(c). A copy of 

the order was sent to both appellant and her court-appointed trial counsel, Ms. Sharon Thorne. 

In re J.O.H., 283 S.W.3d 336, 343 (Tex. 2009) (providing that court-appointed trial counsel’s 

duty of representation continues until relieved of that duty); see TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 

107.013(a)(1) (setting out statutory right of indigent parents to counsel in parental rights 

termination cases). 

When Ms. Thorne did not timely respond, we abated the appeal and ordered the trial 

court to conduct a hearing to determine the following questions: (1) whether Ms. Throne had 

abandoned the appeal, (2) whether appellant was entitled to new counsel, and (3) whether Ms. 

Throne should be sanctioned. On January 8, 2021, the trial court held a hearing, and Ms. Throne 

appeared, but appellant did not. The trial court found that Ms. Thorne had been unable to contact 

appellant after several attempts and was unaware that appellant wished to appeal. The trial court 

concluded that Ms. Thorne had not abandoned the appeal and should not be sanctioned. It also 

granted Ms. Thorne permission to withdraw and appointed new appellate counsel, Mr. Gerald 

Uretsky to represent appellant. 

In light of the foregoing, we ORDER this appeal reinstated on the docket of our court 

and ORDER Mr. Gerald Uretsky to file a response by January 29, 2021 to our order dated 
October 2, 2020 explaining why appellant failed to file her pro se notice of appeal in a timely 

manner. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed for 

lack of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). All other appellate deadlines are suspended 

until further order of this court. 

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of January, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 149 (Monday, August 4, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45186-45187]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-18345]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

 Notice of Open Meeting

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a teleconference call of the Secretary 
of Energy Advisory Board (SEAB). SEAB

[[Page 45187]]

was reestablished pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. 
L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) (the Act). This notice is provided in 
accordance with the Act.

DATES: Friday, August 18, 2014 from 2:00 p.m. to 2:45 p.m. (ET). To 
receive the call-in number and passcode, please contact the Board's 
Deputy Designated Federal Officer (DFO) at the address or email listed 
below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Corey Williams-Allen, Deputy 
Designated Federal Officer, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585; or email: 
seab@hq.doe.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    The Board was established to provide advice and recommendations to 
the Secretary on the Department's basic and applied research, economic 
and national security policy, educational issues, operational issues, 
and other activities as directed by the Secretary.

Purpose of the Meeting

    This meeting is a public meeting of the Board.

Tentative Agenda

    The meeting will start at 2:00 p.m. on August 18, 2014. The 
tentative meeting agenda includes updates on the work of the SEAB Next 
Generation High Performance Computing Task Force and comments from the 
public. The meeting will conclude at 2:45 p.m. Agenda updates and a 
draft of the report will be posted on the SEAB Web site: 
www.energy.gov/seab.

Public Participation

    The meeting is open to the public. Written statements may be filed 
with the Board either before or after the meeting. Members of the 
public who wish to make oral statements pertaining to agenda items 
should contact Corey Williams-Allen at the address or email address 
listed above. Requests to make oral comments must be received five days 
prior to the meeting. The Designated Federal Officer (or designee) is 
empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will facilitate the 
orderly conduct of business.
    Those not able to join the teleconference call or who have 
insufficient time to address the committee are invited to send a 
written statement to Corey Williams-Allen, U.S. Department of Energy, 
1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585, or email to: 
seab@hq.doe.gov.

Minutes

    The minutes of the meeting will be available by contacting Mr. 
Williams-Allen. He may be reached at the postal address or email 
address above, or by visiting SEAB's Web site at www.energy.gov/seab.

    Issued in Washington, DC on July 29, 2014.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-18345 Filed 8-1-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We have issued our
report dated August 4, 2020, with respect to the financial statement of SmartTrust 487 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-238288) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration
Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


August 4, 2020
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC

Flightline Ground, Inc. Complainant v. Louisiana Department OfTransportation And Development, As Successor To The Louisiana Division OfAdministration And The Board Of Commissioners For The Management OfThe Lakefront Airport; Non-Flood Protection Asset Management Authority, As Successor To The Board OfCommissioners OfThe Orleans Parish Levee District And Orleans Parish Levee District, Division OfNon-Flood Assets. Respondent FAADocket No. 16-11-01

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based onthe abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practicefor Federally-Assisted AirportEnforcementProceedings, 14 CFRpart 16. Pursuant to part 16, subpart B, the date by which the Final Agency Decision will be issued inthis matter is hereby extended to November 7, 2014. An extension oftime is necessary and an appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this case.

Eduardo A. Angeles Associate Administrator

for Airports Date**~** 

### 7CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on 

## OCT 10 , 2014, I caused to be placed in the United States mail (first class mail, postage paid) a true copy ofthe Notice ofExtension ofTime, addressed to: Counsel for Complainant Alan Armstrong, Esq. Attorney at Law 2900 Chamblee Tucker Road Building 5, Suite 350 Atlanta, GA 30341 Counsel for Respondent Brandon Brown, Esq. General Counsel Louisiana Department ofTransportation and

Development 1201 Capital Access Road Office 

### S304/S305 Baton Rouge, LA 70804 Gerald G. Metzger, Esq. Charles Curtis, Esq. Metzger LawFirm 829 Baronne Street New Orleans, LA 70113 Hand-Delivered to: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket FAA Airport Compliance and Management Analysis, AC0-100 FAA Southwest Region, ASW-600
# EUR-Lex - 11985I185 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11985I185

**DOCUMENTS CONCERNING THE ACCESSION OF THE KINGDOM OF SPAIN AND THE PORTUGUESE REPUBLIC TO THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, ACT CONCERNING THE CONDITIONS OF ACCESSION OF THE KINGDOM OF SPAIN AND THE PORTUGUESE REPUBLIC AND THE ADJUSTMENTS TO THE TREATIES, ARTICLE 185 **

*
Official Journal L 302 , 15/11/1985 P. 0079 *

++++

Article 185

The revenue designated as " agricultural levies " referred to in the first paragraph of Article 2 ( a ) of the Decision of 21 April 1970 shall also include the revenue from any amount recorded on import in trade between Spain and the other Member States and between Spain and third countries under Articles 67 to 153 , 50 ( 3 ) and 53 .

However , that revenue shall include only from 1 January 1990 the compensatory charges recorded for the fruit and vegetables falling within Regulation ( EEC ) No 1035/72 imported into Spain .

That revenue shall not include any amounts levied on imports into the Canary Islands or Ceuta and Melilla .
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5107

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to provide for the study of

Rock Creek in the State of Montana for potential addition to the national

wild and scenic rivers system, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 26, 1994

Mr. WILLIAMS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Natural Resources

A BILL

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to provide for

the study of Rock Creek in the State of Montana for

potential addition to the national wild and scenic rivers

system, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. STUDY OF ROCK CREEK.

4 Section 5(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16

5 U.S.C. 1271 and following) is amended by adding the fol6 lowing at the end thereof:
2

•HR 5107 IH

1 ‘‘( ) ROCK CREEK, MONTANA.—The segment down2 stream from its headwaters to its confluence with the

3 Clark Fork, including its tributaries.’’.

Æ
§ 217.293 Prohibitions. Except for the takings described in § 217.292 and authorized by an LOA issued under §§ 217.296 or 217.297, it is unlawful for any person to do any of the following in connection with the activities described in this subpart: ( a ) Violate, or fail to comply with, the terms, conditions, and requirements of this subpart or an LOA issued under §§ 217.296 or 217.297;
( b ) Take any marine mammal not specified in § 217.292(d);
( c ) Take any marine mammal specified in the LOA in any manner other than as specified in the LOA; or
( d ) Take any marine mammal specified in § 217.292(d), after NMFS determines such taking results in more than a negligible impact on the species or stocks of such marine mammals.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

August 6, 2009 

p0720 

Order 

 

August 6, 2009 

138814 

JEAN BAUMGARD, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 138814 

 COA: 281589 

Genesee CC: 06-083472-NI 

FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 24, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit
10.1





DESCRIPTION
OF DIRECTORS AND


NAMED
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS COMPENSATION





In accordance with the “Frequently
Asked Questions” bulletin posted by the staff of the Division of Corporation
Finance of the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 23, 2004 on the
Securities and Exchange Commission’s website, we are disclosing the following
information that the Securities and Exchange Commission may deem to be material
definitive agreements with our directors and executive officers.





Bancorp
does not compensate its directors.  Each director of Bancorp is also a
director of the Bank.  Meetings of the directors of Bancorp are held
immediately before or after meetings of the directors of the Bank. In 2008,
non-employee directors of the Bank will receive $2,300 per attended meeting,
with the Vice-Chairman receiving $5,500 per attended meeting. In addition, each
non-employee committee member will receive the following: $300 per Compliance
Committee meeting; $625 per Audit and Examining Committee meeting; $880 per
Compensation Committee meeting; $800 per Corporate Governance Committee meeting;
and $880 per Audit and Examining Committee meeting.  The Chairman of
the committees will receive a fee of up to $270 per committee
meeting.  The Board members receive no additional compensation for
acting as the Nominating Committee.




We have not entered into employment
agreements with any of the executive officers, who are employed on an at-will
basis.  In 2008, the Bank’s executive officers will earn the annual
base salaries set forth opposite their names below and will be entitled to a
bonus, if any, as determined by the Compensation Committee:





Name
            Title
            2008 SalaryAlan
      J. Hyatt
            President
      and Chief Executive Officer
            $325,000S.
      Scott Kirkley
            Executive
      Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer
            $245,000Thomas
      G. Bevivino
            Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
            $179,000





The executive officers are entitled to
participate in the Bank’s 401(k) Plan and in an Employee Stock Ownership
Plan.  The Bank makes a matching contribution of 50% of each executive
officer’s 401(k) Plan contribution up to 6% of such executive officer’s salary,
and an additional non-matching contribution at the discretion of the Board of
Directors.  In addition, the Bank pays the health insurance premiums
for Mr. Kirkley and Mr. Bevivino.
Case 16-25348 Doc 7 Filed 08/08/16 Entered 08/08/16 09:13:13 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-25348 Doc 7 Filed 08/08/16 Entered 08/08/16 09:13:13 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
U.S. Department of Justice

Office of Community Oriented Policing Services

145 N Street NE

Washington, DC 20530

800-421-6770

www.cops.usdoj.gov

Community Policing In Action Photo Contest

Instructions: An authorized representative of the law enforcement agency must complete the Permission and Release 

form. A signed original must be included with the law enforcement agency’s official photo contest submission.

Permission and Release to Law Enforcement Agencies

The law enforcement agency certifies that it owns the copyright to the photograph(s) submitted to the Community 

Policing in Action Photo Contest or has obtained the necessary permission(s) from the copyright owner(s).

The law enforcement agency warrants and represents that the photograph(s) does not infringe upon any copyright, 

invade any right of privacy, contain any libelous or slanderous material, violate any other right of any person or entity, 

and is not otherwise contrary to law.

The law enforcement agency grants the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) a non-exclusive, worldwide, irrevocable and 

royalty-free license to use, and authorize others to use, our photograph in any media format for Federal Government 

purposes. DOJ is not required to seek additional approval in connection with such uses.

The law enforcement agency authorizes DOJ and all persons acting under its authority or permission to alter, modify, 

or adapt our photograph(s). The law enforcement agency waives the right to inspect or approve the finished product. 

The law enforcement agency further grants permission to use our agency’s name in descriptive text or commentary in 

connection with the use of our photograph(s).

The law enforcement agency certifies that it has secured Privacy Consent, Waiver, and Release Authorizing Use and 

Disclosure of Photographic Image forms from each individual recognizable in our photograph(s) or, in the case of a 

minor, from each minor’s parent or legal guardian.

The law enforcement agency agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the DOJ and its employees, agents or 

representatives, from any and all liability for any injuries, loss, claim, action, demand or damage of any kind arising 

from or in connection with this contest including, but not limited to, any third party claim for copyright infringement 

or a violation of any individual’s right to privacy and/or publicity right.

By signing this form, I acknowledge that I am an authorized law enforcement agency representative and have read the 

foregoing and understand the contents, meaning and impact thereof:

Print Name and Title of Law Enforcement Agency Representative 

Name of Law Enforcement Agency

Signature of Law Enforcement Agency Representative Date

Please print legibly.

Brief (one-sentence) description of photo
Editorial Note on Part 622
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 622 appear at 79 FR 57837, Sept. 26, 2014 and at 81 FR 32253, May 23, 2016.

§ 622.277 Bag and possession limits. Section 622.11(a) provides the general applicability for bag and possession limits. ( a ) *Atlantic dolphin and wahoo.* Bag and possession limits are as follows: ( 1 ) *Dolphin.* ( i ) In the Atlantic EEZ—10, not to exceed 54 per vessel, whichever is less, except on board a headboat, 10 per paying passenger.
( ii ) In the Atlantic EEZ and lawfully harvested in Bahamian waters (as per § 622.276(b))—10, not to exceed 60 per vessel, whichever is less, except on board a headboat, 10 per paying passenger. For the purposes of this paragraph, for determining how many dolphin are on board a vessel in fillet form when harvested lawfully in Bahamian waters, two fillets of dolphin, regardless of the length of each fillet, is equivalent to one dolphin. The skin must remain intact on the entire fillet of any dolphin carcass.
( 2 ) *Wahoo.* ( i ) In the Atlantic EEZ—2.
( ii ) In the Atlantic EEZ and lawfully harvested in Bahamian waters (as per § 622.276(b))—2. For the purposes of this paragraph, for determining how many wahoo are on board a vessel in fillet form when harvested lawfully in Bahamian waters, two fillets of wahoo, regardless of the length of each fillet, is equivalent to one wahoo. The skin must remain intact on the entire fillet of any wahoo carcass.
( b ) [Reserved]
[78 FR 22952, Apr. 17, 2013, as amended at 80 FR 80689, Dec. 28, 2015; 87 FR 19019, Apr. 1, 2022]
Volunteer Engagement for 

American Indian and Alaska 

Native Missing Persons Cases 

A special project under the COPS 

Office’s Collaborative Reform 

Initiative Technical Assistance 

Center (CRI-TAC)

To help address the missing or murdered Indigenous persons crisis, the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) worked with the COPS Office to 

develop a training on volunteer programs in tribal law enforcement agencies. This 

training supports tribal agencies in starting and managing volunteer programs 

to support missing persons cases. Building upon the IACP’s Volunteers in Police 

Service curriculum, this training includes a workshop geared toward tribal leadership and an eight-hour training for tribal law enforcement and other staff who 

will develop the program and manage volunteers.

For more information, and to request the program 

be delivered at your location, go to: 

https://cops.usdoj.gov/cri-tac

f102015017
§ 224.104 Special requirements for fishing activities to protect endangered sea turtles. ( a ) Shrimp fishermen in the southeastern United States and the Gulf of Mexico who comply with rules for threatened sea turtles specified in § 223.206 of this chapter will not be subject to civil penalties under the Act for incidental captures of endangered sea turtles by shrimp trawl gear.
( b ) Summer flounder fishermen in the Summer flounder fishery-sea turtle protection area who comply with rules for threatened sea turtles specified in § 223.206 of this chapter will not be subject to civil penalties under the Act for incidental captures of endangered sea turtles by summer flounder gear.
( c ) Special prohibitions relating to sea turtles are provided at § 223.206(d).
[64 FR 14066, Mar. 23, 1999, as amended at 66 FR 44552, Aug. 24, 2001; 66 FR 67496, Dec. 31, 2001; 68 FR 8471, Feb. 21, 2003; 69 FR 18453, Apr. 7, 2004; 72 FR 31757, June 8, 2007]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB FOR THE
QUARTER ENDED JULY 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                            1817
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1817
<PP&E>                                            1861
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   11797
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             9187
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         54250
<OTHER-SE>                                     (51640)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     11797
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 12813
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (12813)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
Case 16-26635 Doc 1 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 05:12:07 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 7
Case 16-26635 Doc 1 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 05:12:07 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 7
Case 16-26635 Doc 1 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 05:12:07 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 7
Case 16-26635 Doc 1 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 05:12:07 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 7
Case 16-26635 Doc 1 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 05:12:07 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 7
Case 16-26635 Doc 1 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 05:12:07 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 7
Case 16-26635 Doc 1 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 05:12:07 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 7