alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         796     
<SECURITIES>                                   0       
<RECEIVABLES>                                  40,083  
<ALLOWANCES>                                   839     
<INVENTORY>                                    0       
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0       
<PP&E>                                         799,607 
<DEPRECIATION>                                 112,294 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 941,287 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0       
<BONDS>                                        845,447 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0       
<PREFERRED>                                    0       
<COMMON>                                       33      
<OTHER-SE>                                     (63,291)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   941,287 
<SALES>                                        287,094 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               287,094 
<CGS>                                          141,753 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  141,753 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               67,722  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0       
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             65,060  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                12,559  
<INCOME-TAX>                                   8,768   
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3,791   
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0       
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0       
<CHANGES>                                      0       
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,791   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.14    
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.14    
                                               

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 27, 2020

s0520 

# Order

Clerk May 27, 2020

160562

RAYSHAWN PACE,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

and

GET WELL MEDICAL TRANSPORT

COMPANY,

Intervening Plaintiff

- Appellant,

and

AFFILIATED DIAGNOSTICS OF OAKLAND,

LLC,

Intervening Plaintiff,

v SC: 160562

COA: 339777

Wayne CC: 15

- 006548

- NI

JOHN DOE, ANGELA NOE L, and HOME

- OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendants,

and

AUTO

- OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 8, 2019

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

C AVANAGH , J., did not participate due to her prior relationship with Garan Lucow

Miller, P.C.
OSLDPS INFORMATION BULLETIN

No. 00-005 March 6, 2000

TO: All State Agency Heads

All State Agency Points of Contact

FROM: C. H. “Butch” Straub II

Director

SUBJECT: Release of Office for State and Local Domestic Preparedness Support

Training Videos: “Surviving Weapons Mass Destruction” and “Weapons

of Mass Destruction and First the Responder.”

It is my pleasure to announce the release of two first responder training videos produced with

funding provided by the Office for State and Local Domestic Preparedness Support (OSLDPS). 

The videos are intended to provide emergency response agencies with helpful information that

could be used to enhance the emergency services and first responder capabilities in their

jurisdictions. 

The production of the films were made possible with the dedication and support of the Georgia

Emergency Management Agency (GEMA) and the Seattle Fire Department. GEMA coordinated

the production of the, “Surviving Weapons of Mass Destruction” training video which is

designed to enhance the survivability of first responders during an incident of biological

terrorism. The Seattle Fire Department handled the production of the “Weapons of Mass

Destruction and the First Responder” video, and provides the viewer with helpful information to

recognize when to use existing assets and resources on-hand within the jurisdiction which could

be used to mitigate a terrorist incident and shape a jurisdiction-wide response to mass casualty

terrorism. 

Feel free to incorporate the video in your training programs or to share them with agencies that

may benefit from their use. Additional copies of the training videos may be obtained by

contacting OSLDPS at 202-305-9887.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5263

To amend the District of Columbia Self-Government and Governmental Reorganization Act to prohibit any individual convicted of a crime subject

to a term of imprisonment of 6 months or longer from serving as

a member of the Council of the District of Columbia or as the Mayor

of the District of Columbia.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 7, 1994

Mr. FRANKS of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on the District of Columbia

A BILL

To amend the District of Columbia Self-Government and

Governmental Reorganization Act to prohibit any individual convicted of a crime subject to a term of imprisonment of 6 months or longer from serving as a member

of the Council of the District of Columbia or as the

Mayor of the District of Columbia.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 5263 IH

1 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION AGAINST INDIVIDUALS CON2 VICTED OF CERTAIN CRIMES SERVING ON

3 THE COUNCIL OR AS MAYOR OF THE DIS4 TRICT OF COLUMBIA.

5 (a) QUALIFICATIONS OF MEMBERS OF COUNCIL.—

6 The first sentence of section 402 of the District of Colum7 bia Self-Government and Governmental Reorganization

8 Act (sec. 1–225, D.C. Code) is amended by striking ‘‘and

9 (d)’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘(d) has never been con10 victed of any crime that is subject to a term of imprison11 ment of 6 months or longer, and (e)’’.

12 (b) QUALIFICATIONS OF MAYOR.—The first sentence

13 of section 421(c)(1) of such Act (sec. 1–241(c)(1), D.C.

14 Code) is amended by striking ‘‘and (C)’’ and inserting the

15 following: ‘‘(C) has never been convicted of any crime that

16 is subject to a term of imprisonment of 6 months or

17 longer, and (D)’’.

18 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

19 The amendments made by section 1 shall apply to

20 individuals convicted of crimes before, on, or after the date

21 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

In re: 

Antwan Lonnie Hatchett, Sr

Debtor(s)

Case No. 16 B 27764

CHAPTER 13 STANDING TRUSTEE’S FINAL REPORT AND ACCOUNT

Marilyn O. Marshall, chapter 13 trustee, submits the following Final Report and Account 

of the administration of the estate pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1302(b)(1). The trustee declares as 

follows:

1) The case was filed on 08/30/2016.

2) The plan was confirmed on NA .

3) The plan was modified by order after confirmation pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1329 on

NA .

4) The trustee filed action to remedy default by the debtor in performance under the plan 

on NA .

5) The case was Dismissed on 10/06/2016.

6) Number of months from filing to last payment: 0.

7) Number of months case was pending: 3.

8) Total value of assets abandoned by court order: NA .

9) Total value of assets exempted: NA .

10) Amount of unsecured claims discharged without payment: $0.00.

11) All checks distributed by the trustee relating to this case have cleared the bank.

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (9/1/2009)

Case 16-27764 Doc 14 Filed 12/14/16 Entered 12/14/16 15:38:46 Desc Page 1

 of 3
Receipts:

Total paid by or on behalf of the debtor $0.00

Less amount refunded to debtor $0.00

NET RECEIPTS: $0.00

Expenses of Administration:

Attorney’s Fees Paid Through the Plan $0.00

Court Costs $0.00

Trustee Expenses & Compensation $0.00

Other $0.00

TOTAL EXPENSES OF ADMINISTRATION: $0.00

Attorney fees paid and disclosed by debtor: $0.00

Scheduled Creditors:

Creditor

Name Class

Claim

Scheduled

Claim

Asserted

Claim

Allowed

Int.

Paid

Principal

Paid

Summary of Disbursements to Creditors:

Secured Payments:

Mortgage Ongoing

Mortgage Arrearage

Debt Secured by Vehicle

All Other Secured

TOTAL SECURED:

Priority Unsecured Payments:

Domestic Support Arrearage

Domestic Support Ongoing

All Other Priority

TOTAL PRIORITY:

GENERAL UNSECURED PAYMENTS:

Claim

Allowed

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Principal

Paid

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Interest

Paid

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (9/1/2009)

Case 16-27764 Doc 14 Filed 12/14/16 Entered 12/14/16 15:38:46 Desc Page 2

 of 3
Disbursements:

Expenses of Administration $0.00

Disbursements to Creditors $0.00

TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS : $0.00

12) The trustee certifies that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 5009, 

the estate has been fully administered, the foregoing summary is true and complete, and all 

administrative matters for which the trustee is responsible have been completed. The trustee 

requests a final decree be entered that discharges the trustee and grants such other relief as may 

be just and proper.

Dated: 12/14/2016

STATEMENT: This Unified Form is associated with an open bankruptcy case, therefore, Paperwork Reduction 

Act exemption 5 C.F.R. § 1320.4(a)(2) applies.

By:/s/ Marilyn O. Marshall

Trustee

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (9/1/2009)

Case 16-27764 Doc 14 Filed 12/14/16 Entered 12/14/16 15:38:46 Desc Page 3

 of 3
# EUR-Lex - 12004V/PRO/35 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V/PRO/35

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - Protocols and Annexes - 35.Protocol on the financial consequences of the expiry of the Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community and on the Research Fund for Coal and Steel **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0389 - 0390 *

35. PROTOCOL ON THE FINANCIAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE EXPIRY OF THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN COAL AND STEEL COMMUNITY AND ON THE RESEARCH FUND FOR COAL AND STEEL

THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES,

RECALLING that all assets and liabilities of the European Coal and Steel Community, as they existed on 23 July 2002, were transferred to the European Community on 24 July 2002;

TAKING ACCOUNT of the desire to use these funds for research in sectors related to the coal and steel industry and therefore the necessity to provide for certain special rules in this regard,

HAVE AGREED UPON the following provisions, which shall be annexed to the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe:

Article 1

1. The net worth of the assets and liabilities of the European Coal and Steel Community, as they appear in the balance sheet of the European Coal and Steel Community of 23 July 2002, subject to any increase or decrease which may occur as a result of the liquidation operations, shall be considered as Union assets intended for research in sectors related to the coal and steel industry, referred to as the "European Coal and Steel Community in liquidation". On completion of the liquidation they shall be referred to as the "Assets of the Research Fund for Coal and Steel".

2. The revenue from these assets, referred to as the "Research Fund for Coal and Steel", shall be used exclusively for research, outside the research framework programme, in sectors related to the coal and steel industry in accordance with this Protocol and with acts adopted under it.

Article 2

1. A European law of the Council shall lay down all the necessary provisions for the implementation of this Protocol, including essential principles. The Council shall act after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament.

2. The Council shall adopt, on a proposal from the Commission, the European regulations or decisions establishing multiannual financial guidelines for managing the assets of the Research Fund for Coal and Steel and technical guidelines for the research programme of the Research Fund for Coal and Steel. It shall act after consulting the European Parliament.

Article 3

Except as otherwise provided in this Protocol and in the acts adopted under it, the provisions of the Constitution shall apply.

--------------------------------------------------
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 24, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40966 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ALBERTO CRUZ-RANGEL, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-874-ALL

-------------------- Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Alberto CruzRangel raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

WILLIAM OZAH
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 1523

[ December 6, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Michael A. Robinson , Judge; L.T. Case No. 17

- 004070

- CF

- 10A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Nancy Jack, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rachael Kaiman, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

T

AYLOR

, C IKLIN and C ONNER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER 

8725 JOHN J. KINGMAN ROAD 

FORT BELVOIR, VIRGINIA 22060-6218 

MEMORANDUM FOR DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER EMPLOYEES 

SUBJECT: Anti-Harassment Policy Statement and Procedures 

I am committed to and ask you to join me in ensuring a work environment free of 

harassment at DTIC. Workplace harassment destroys morale, teamwork, and productivity; and 

violates federal law. Workplace harassment described in Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) 

and Federal laws, Executive Orders, and regulations includes hostile words and actions against a 

worker based on race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy, gender identity, and sexual 

orientation), national origin, age, disability (mental and physical), genetic information (including 

family medical history), parental status, marital status, military service, and political affiliation. 

Workplace harassment also includes hostile words and actions taken in retaliation for, or reprisal 

based on, prior EEO or protected activity. Workplace harassment warrants adverse action when 

it alters the conditions of an individual's employment either by culminating in a tangible 

employment action or being sufficiently severe or pervasive as to create a hostile work 

environment. If you experience harassment, I encourage you to report it, allowing us to both 

timely address the situation and take corrective measures. We are all responsible for ensuring a 

positive, harassment-free environment, which requires that everyone who works at DTIC 

(civilians and contractors) report any instances of harassment they see, and to wholeheartedly 

support this Anti-Harassment Policy. Individuals who report instances of harassment will be 

protected against retaliation and will have their confidentiality protected if they elect to file an 

anonymous complaint of harassment. 

Any behavior which undermines the integrity of the employment relationship at DTIC is 

a violation of our ethical standards. Managers and supervisors are expected to be role models for 

proper workplace behavior, foster an environment free from any harassment, know how to spot 

conduct that may be considered harassment, and initiate prompt corrective actions. All DTIC 

and non-DTIC employees in DTIC workspaces are expected to behave professionally and treat 

each other with respect. 

Harassment of any kind is unacceptable, will not be tolerated, and will be addressed 

aggressively. Employees who believe they have been harassed or have witnessed conduct that is 

in violation of this Policy should immediately report the behavior to their supervisor or the 

Deputy Director for Resource Management. Employees also have the right to contact the DLA 

EEO Office via email at HQEEOinquiries@dla.mil. Allegations of harassment will undergo a 

prompt, thorough, and impartial investigation by the DTIC-R Personnel Administrative Team. 

The appropriate administrative and/or disciplinary action will be initiated for all substantiated 

instances of harassment. 

UNCLASSIFIED 

November 1, 2023
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6079

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

EDWARD LEVERNE BROOKS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Sr., District Judge. (CR-94-127, CA-96-206)

Submitted: May 1, 1997 Decided: May 8, 1997

Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward Leverne Brooks, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin H. White, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Brooks, Nos. CR-94-127; CA-96-206 (M.D.N.C. Nov.

18, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5047 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5047

    To provide for the establishment of a commission to recommend a 
 standardized honor code for the three military service academies, the 
Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps, and officer candidate schools.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 19, 1994

Mr. Underwood introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To provide for the establishment of a commission to recommend a 
 standardized honor code for the three military service academies, the 
Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps, and officer candidate schools.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Service Academy Honor Code 
Act''.

SEC. 2. COMMISSION ON STANDARDIZED MILITARY HONOR CODE.

    (a) Establishment of Commission.--The Secretary of Defense shall 
establish a commission to develop recommendations for a standardized 
honor code for use at the military service academies and officer 
candidate schools of the Armed Forces and in the Senior Reserve 
Officers' Training Corps.
    (b) Members of Commission.--The members of the commission shall be 
appointed by the Secretary of Defense and shall consist of--
            (1) officers of the Armed Forces on active duty;
            (2) persons who are graduates of a military service academy 
        but are no longer on active or reserve duty in the Armed 
        Forces; and
            (3) persons who are educators at institutions of higher 
        education.
    (c) Submission of Recommendations.--Not later than one year after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, the commission shall submit to 
the Secretary of Defense and the Congress a report containing the 
commission's recommendations regarding--
            (1) standardization of the various honor codes in use at 
        the military service academies; and
            (2) whether such standardized honor code should apply to 
        the officer candidate schools of the Armed Forces and the 
        Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps.
    (d) Service Academy Defined.--For purposes of this section, the 
term ``military service academy'' means the United States Military 
Academy, the United States Air Force Academy, or the United States 
Naval Academy.
                                 <all>
```
(function (D) {
  var beforeSerialize = D.ajax.prototype.beforeSerialize;
  D.ajax.prototype.beforeSerialize = function (element, options) {
    beforeSerialize.call(this, element, options);
    options.data['ajax_page_state[jquery_version]'] = D.settings.ajaxPageState.jquery_version;
  }
})(Drupal);
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5283 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5283

To request the Secretary of the Navy to name an appropriate ship of the 
             United States Navy the U.S.S. Joseph Vittori.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 7, 1994

 Mr. Torkildsen (for himself, Mr. Spence, Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Saxton, 
  Mr. Talent, Mr. Dornan, Mr. McCloskey, Mr. Parker, Mr. Emerson, Mr. 
McCollum, Mr. McHugh, and Mr. Lipinski) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To request the Secretary of the Navy to name an appropriate ship of the 
             United States Navy the U.S.S. Joseph Vittori.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That it is the sense of 
Congress that the Secretary of the Navy should name an appropriate ship 
of the United States Navy the U.S.S. Joseph Vittori, in honor of Marine 
Corporal Joseph Vittori (1929-1951) of Beverly, Massachusetts, who was 
posthumously awarded the Medal of Honor for actions against the enemy 
in Korea on September 15-16, 1951.
                                 <all>
```