alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 11985I358 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11985I358

**DOCUMENTS CONCERNING THE ACCESSION OF THE KINGDOM OF SPAIN AND THE PORTUGUESE REPUBLIC TO THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, ACT CONCERNING THE CONDITIONS OF ACCESSION OF THE KINGDOM OF SPAIN AND THE PORTUGUESE REPUBLIC AND THE ADJUSTMENTS TO THE TREATIES, ARTICLE 358 **

*
Official Journal L 302 , 15/11/1985 P. 0129 *

++++

Article 358

1 . Upon accession , a compensatory indemnity system shall be introduced for sardine producers of the Community , as at present constituted , in relation with the specific price alignment system applicable to that species under Article 356 .

2 . Before the end of the period of price alignment , the Council , acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission , shall decide if and , where appropriate , to what extent the system referred to in this Article shall be prolonged .

3 . The Council , acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission , shall adopt , before 31 December 1985 , the detailed rules for implementing this Article .
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 12-2729

___________________________

Dennis James Gaede

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

James T. Podrebarac; Leann K. Bertsch;

Warren Emmer; Tim Schuetzle; Kathy Bachmeier

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of North Dakota - Bismarck

____________

 Submitted: February 28, 2013

Filed: March 8, 2013

[Unpublished]

____________

Before BYE, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.
Inmate Dennis James Gaede appeals following the district court’s adverse

1

grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon de novo review of

the record, see Mason v. Corr. Med. Servs., Inc., 559 F.3d 880, 884-85 (8th Cir.

2009), we find no basis for overturning the grant of summary judgment to defendant

dentist James T. Podrebarac, see Beaulieu v. Ludeman, 690 F.3d 1017, 1024 (8th Cir.

2012) (conjecture and speculation are insufficient to defeat summary judgment);

Mason, 559 F.3d at 885 (inmate could not rely on inadmissible hearsay to avoid

summary judgment); see also Nelson v. Shuffman, 603 F.3d 439, 449 (8th Cir. 2010)

(inmates have no constitutional right to receive requested or particular course of

treatment, and prison doctor is free to exercise independent medical judgment;

inmate’s mere difference of opinion on matters requiring medical judgment does not

rise to level of constitutional violation). As to the remaining defendants, theymerely

2

responded to Gaede’s grievances, and in doing so, they consulted with Dr.

Podrebarac. Cf. Meloy v. Bachmeier, 302 F.3d 845, 849 (8th Cir. 2002) (prison’s

medical treatment director who lacked medical expertise could not be liable for

medical staff’s diagnostic decisions). Finally, to the extent Gaede is challenging the

district court’s denial of his motion for reconsideration, we find no abuse of

discretion. See Arnold v. ADT Sec. Servs., Inc., 627 F.3d 716, 721-22 (8th Cir.

2010). The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

______________________________

TheHonorable Daniel L. Hovland, United States DistrictJudge for the District 1

of North Dakota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Charles

S. Miller, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of North Dakota.

Gaede has waived his claims against Warren Emmer. See Carraher v. Target 2

Corp., 503 F.3d 714, 716 n.2 (8th Cir. 2007).

-2-
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted (via teleconference). The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, October 17, 2006. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Audrey Y. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 (toll-free), or 718-488-2085 (non toll-free). 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    An open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Tuesday, October 17, 2006 from 9 a.m. ET to 10 a.m. ET via a telephone conference call. Individual comments will be limited to 5 minutes. If you would like to have the TAP consider a written statement, please call 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-2085, or write Audrey Y. Jenkins, TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate in the telephone conference call meeting must be made with Audrey Y. Jenkins. Ms. Jenkins can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-2085, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org*.                 

The agenda will include various IRS issues. 

Dated: September 12, 2006. 

John Fay, 

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel. 

[FR Doc. 06-7856 Filed 9-13-06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### § 17.101 Scope.

This subpart applies to the West Indian manatee (*Trichechus manatus*), also known as the Florida manatee and as the sea cow. The provisions of this subpart are in addition to, and not in lieu of, other regulations contained in this chapter I which may require a permit or prescribe additional restrictions on the importation, exportation, transportation, or taking of wildlife, and the regulations contained in title 33, CFR, which regulate the use of navigable waters.
Incorporation by Reference

Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0257

May 17, 2010-05-17

The contents of the following docket are hereby incorporated by reference into and are 

considered to be included in, contained in, and to have been placed in Docket No. EPA-HQ-OW2010-0257 (Draft National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Pesticide General 

Permit for Point Source Discharges from the Application of Pesticides):

EPA-HQ-OW-2003-0063 (Interim Statement and Guidance on Application of Pesticides to 

Waters of the United States in Compliance with FIFRA), legacy EDOCKET ID No. OW2003-0063.

Accessing dockets:

All documents in the docket are listed in the www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the 

index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, will be 

publicly available only in hard copy. Publicly available docket materials are available either 

electronically in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at a docket facility. The Office of Water 

(OW) Docket Center is open from 8:30 until 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. The OW Docket Center telephone number is (202) 566–2426, and the Docket address 

is OW Docket, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 

20004. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566–

1744.
# EUR-Lex - 12002E015 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E015

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part One: Principles - Article 15 - Article 7c - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0044 - 0044 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0185 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0010 - Consolidated version *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part One: Principles

Article 15

Article 7c - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 15

When drawing up its proposals with a view to achieving the objectives set out in Article 14, the Commission shall take into account the extent of the effort that certain economies showing differences in development will have to sustain during the period of establishment of the internal market and it may propose appropriate provisions.

If these provisions take the form of derogations, they must be of a temporary nature and must cause the least possible disturbance to the functioning of the common market.
**';        if(hasIFC){        str+='';        } else if (navigator.appName == "Netscape"){        str+='';        } else {        str+='';	}        str+='';        str+='';        str+='';        str+='';        str+='';        str+='';        str+='';        str+='';        str+='';        str+='';        str+='';        str+='';        str+='';        str+='';        str+='';        str+='';        str+='';        str+='';        str+='';        str+='';        str+='';        str+='';        str+='';        str+='';        str+='';        str+='';//      str+='Copyright © 1997 Netscape Communications Corporation. All Rights Reserved.';	str+='';        str+='';}function GuidedSearch() {	setJava();	setIFC();   if (hasJava) {         GuidedSearchApplet();      }   else {      var myWin = open('/search?NS-query-pat=/text/NS-advquery.pat', '_self');      }}function setSearchData(myForm){    searchContext = document.search.pushIFCContext();    myForm.searchPattern.value = searchContext.setSearchQuery();    myForm.collectionName.value = searchContext.setCollectionName();    document.search.popIFCContext();}    **
No. 11-9738.

#### Dax *v.*Wyoming et al.

Sup. Ct. Wyo. Certio-rari denied.
§ 404.10 Commercial fishing. ( a ) *Lobster fishing.* Any commercial lobster fishing permit is subject to a zero annual harvest limit condition.
( b ) *Fishing and bottomfish and pelagic species.* ( 1 ) Notwithstanding the prohibitions in § 404.7(a) and (h), commercial fishing for bottomfish and associated pelagic species may continue within the Monument subject to paragraph (c) of this section, until June 15, 2011, provided that: ( i ) The fishing is conducted in accordance with a valid commercial bottomfish permit issued by NOAA; and
( ii ) Such permit was in effect on June 15, 2006, and is subsequently renewed pursuant to NOAA regulations at 50 CFR part 665, subpart E as necessary.
( 2 ) Total landings for each fishing year from fishing allowed under paragraph (b)(1) of this section may not exceed the following amounts: ( i ) 350,000 pounds for bottomfish species; and
( ii ) 180,000 pounds for pelagic species.
( 3 ) Commercial fishing for bottomfish and associated pelagic species is prohibited in the Monument after June 15, 2011.
( c ) *General requirements.* Any commercial fishing within the Monument shall be conducted in accordance with the following restrictions and conditions: ( 1 ) A valid permit or facsimile of a valid permit shall be on board the fishing vessel and available for inspection by an authorized officer;
( 2 ) No attempt is made to falsify or fail to make, keep, maintain, or submit any logbook or logbook form or other required record or report.
( 3 ) Only gear specifically authorized by the relevant permit issued under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act is allowed to be in the possession of a person conducting commercial fishing under this section;
( 4 ) Any person conducting commercial fishing notifies the Secretaries by telephone, facsimile, or electronic mail at least 72 hours before entering the Monument and within 12 hours after leaving the Monument in accordance with § 404.4(b) and (c);
( 5 ) All fishing vessels must carry an activated and functioning VMS unit on board at all times whenever the vessel is in the Monument;
( 6 ) All fishing vessels must carry an observer when requested to do so by the Secretaries;
( 7 ) The activity does not take place within any Ecological Reserve, any Special Preservation Area, or the Midway Atoll Special Management Area.
§ 221.30 What will the Department of Commerce's designated ALJ office do with a case referral? Within 5 days after the effective date stated in the referral notice under § 221.26(c)(4), 43 CFR 45.26(c)(4), or 7 CFR 1.626(c)(4): ( a ) The Department of Commerce's designated ALJ office must: ( 1 ) Docket the case;
( 2 ) Assign an ALJ to preside over the hearing process and issue a decision; and
( 3 ) Issue a docketing notice that informs the parties of the docket number and the ALJ assigned to the case; and
( b ) The ALJ must issue a notice setting the time, place, and method for conducting an initial prehearing conference under § 221.40. This notice may be combined with the docketing notice under paragraph (a)(3) of this section.
§ 253.13 Initial investigation and approval. ( a ) The Program shall undertake a due diligence investigation of every application it receives to determine if, in the Program's sole judgment, the application is both: ( 1 ) Eligible for a loan because it meets applicable loan requirements; and
( 2 ) Qualified for a loan because the project is deemed an acceptable credit risk.
( b ) The Program will approve eligible and qualified applicants by evaluating the information obtained during the application and investigation process.
( c ) Among other investigations, applicants may be subject to a background check, fisheries violations check and credit review. Background checks are intended to reveal if any key individuals associated with the applicant have been convicted of or are presently facing criminal charges such as fraud, theft, perjury, or other matters which significantly reflect on the applicant's honesty or financial integrity.
( d ) The Program, at its own discretion, may decline or delay approval of any loans or disbursements to any applicant found to have outstanding citations, notices of violations, or other pending legal actions or unresolved claims.
( e ) The Program may place any terms and conditions on such approvals that the Program, in its sole discretion, deems necessary and appropriate.
( f ) *Credit decision.* ( 1 ) The Program shall issue to approved applicants an AIP letter, which shall describe the terms and conditions of the loan, including (but not limited to) loan amounts, maturities, additional collateral, repayment sources or guarantees. Such terms and conditions are at the Program's sole discretion and shall also be incorporated in security documents that the Program prepares. An applicant's non-acceptance of any terms and conditions may result in an applicant's disqualification.
( 2 ) Any application the Program deems ineligible or unqualified will be declined.
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Food Technology Service, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Richard G. Hunter,
chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company at the end of, and for, this period covered by the Report.

September 18, 2008


                                                /s/  Richard G. Hunter, Ph.D.
                                                  ---------------------------
                                                     Richard G. Hunter, Ph.D.,
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                                     and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dr. Julian Feneley, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of FoxHollow Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of BSML, Inc.

Date: April 6, 2007



|    |  |                                     
|--- |  | ------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Dr. Julian Feneley              
|    |  | Dr. Julian Feneley                  
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer and Director
|    |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5133

To provide for expediting an investigation by the International Trade Commission by providing for the monitoring of the importation of certain kinds

of tomatoes and peppers.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 29, 1994

Mr. POMBO (for himself and Mr. THOMAS of California) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To provide for expediting an investigation by the International Trade Commission by providing for the monitoring of the importation of certain kinds of tomatoes and

peppers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘North American Free

5 Trade Agreement Implementation Act Amendments of

6 1994’’.
2

HR 5133 IH

1 SEC. 2. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION MONITORING

2 OF CERTAIN VEGETABLES INTENDED FOR

3 FRESH MARKET USE.

4 Section 316 of the North American Free Trade

5 Agreement Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 3381), is

6 amended to read as follows:

7 ‘‘SEC. 316. MONITORING.

8 ‘‘For purposes of expediting an investigation concern9 ing provisional relief under this title or section 202 of the

10 Trade Act of 1974 regarding—

11 ‘‘(1) fresh or chilled tomatoes suitable for fresh-mar12 ket use provided for in heading 0702.00 of the HTS; and

13 ‘‘(2) fresh or chilled peppers, other than chili peppers,

14 suitable for fresh-market use provided for in subheading

15 0709.60.00 of the HTS;

16 the International Trade Commission, until January 1,

17 2009, shall monitor imports of such goods as if proper

18 requests for such monitoring had been made under sub19 section (d)(1)(C)(i) of section 202. At the request of the

20 International Trade Commission, the Secretary of Agri21 culture and the Commissioner of Customs shall provide

22 to the International Trade Commission information rel23 evant to the monitoring carried out under this section.’’

Æ
Editorial Note on Part 622
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 622 appear at 79 FR 57837, Sept. 26, 2014 and at 81 FR 32253, May 23, 2016.

§ 622.389 Adjustment of management measures. In accordance with the framework procedures of the FMP for Coastal Migratory Pelagic Resources, the RA may establish or modify, and the applicable council is required to approve, the following items specified in paragraph (a) of this section for coastal migratory pelagic fish. (Note: The applicable council refers to the council whose jurisdiction applies to the management measures.) ( a ) For a species or species group: Reporting and monitoring requirements, permitting requirements, bag and possession limits (including a bag limit of zero), size limits, vessel trip limits, closed seasons or areas and reopenings, acceptable biological catches (ABCs) and ABC control rules, annual catch limits (ACLs) and ACL control rules, accountability measures (AMs), annual catch targets (ACTs), quotas (including a quota of zero), MSY (or proxy), OY, management parameters such as overfished and overfishing definitions, gear restrictions (ranging from regulation to complete prohibition), gear markings and identification, vessel markings and identification, rebuilding plans, and restrictions relative to conditions of harvested fish (maintaining fish in whole condition, use as bait).
( b ) [Reserved]
[80 FR 4224, Jan. 27, 2015]
#### § 25.276 Points of communication.

Unless otherwise specified in the station authorization, an earth station may transmit to any space station in the same radio service that is listed as a point of communication in the earth station license, provided that permission has been received from the space station operator to access that space station.

[79 FR 8325, Feb. 12, 2014]
2021 COPS Office Preparing for Active Shooter Situations Program 

Award State and Recipient Award Amount 

Texas 

Texas State University 

ALERRT Preparing for Active Shooter Situations 

$9,790,000
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1727/2005

of 20 October 2005         

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar to certain third countries for the 10th partial invitation to tender issued within the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1) and in particular the second indent of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 10th partial invitation to tender for white sugar issued pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 the maximum amount of the export refund shall be 39,694 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 21 October 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 October 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

(2)OJ L 185, 16.7.2005, p. 3.

----
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-18-00045-CV

Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas, and 

Ken Paxton, Attorney General of the State of Texas, Appellants

v.

TMBJ Investments, Inc., Appellee

FROM THE 261ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. D-1-GN-17-002879, THE HONORABLE KARIN CRUMP, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

Appellants Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas, 

and Ken Paxton, Attorney General of the State of Texas have filed an agreed motion to dismiss 

this appeal. We grant appellants’ motion and, as requested by the parties, dismiss the appeal

with prejudice to refiling by any party. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).

__________________________________________

Jeff Rose, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Triana and Smith

Dismissed on Appellants’ Motion

Filed: December 18, 2019