alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No: 333-61054, 333-43790, 333-112361, and 333-122179on Form S-3, and Registration Statements No. 333-82283 and 333-16935 each on Form S-8, of our report on the consolidated financial statements of BriteSmile Inc. appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of BriteSmile Inc. for the year endedDecember 25, 2004. 

 

/s/    Deloitte & Touche LLP 

 

Oakland, California 

March 25, 2005
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION IX 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San r ncisco, CA 94105 

1 0 2MB 

Mr. Lewis Wallenmeyer, Director 

Clark County Department of Air Quality and Environmental Management 

500 S Grand Central Parkway, IS' Floor 

P.O. Box 555210 

Las Vegas, Nevada 89155-5210 

Dear Mr. Wallenmeyer: 

Thank you for your timely submission of the Annual Network Plan Report, June 

2008. We have reviewed the submitted document and have found that the plan is 

complete, informative, very detailed and meets all of the requirements for annual network 

plans as required by our regulations set forth under 40 CFR Part 58.10. We also 

specifically approve the proposed network changes as discussed on pages 73 - 76 of the 

submitted plan. 

If you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact me at 

(4 15) 972-326 1. 

Sincerely, 

Air Division 

Air Quality Analysis Office 

cc: Tina M. Gingras, CCDAQEM 

Michael Sword, CCDAQEM 

. Yousaf Hammeed, CCDAQEM
# EUR-Lex - 11992M/PRO/DK - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11992M/PRO/DK

**Treaty on European Union - Protocol on certain provisions relating to Denmark **

*
Official Journal C 191 , 29/07/1992 P. 0089 *

PROTOCOL on certain provisions relating to Denmark

THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES,

DESIRING to settle, in accordance with the general objectives of the Treaty establishing the European Community, certain particular problems existing at the present time,

TAKING INTO ACCOUNT that the Danish Constitution contains provisions which may imply a referendum in Denmark prior to Danish participation in the third stage of Economic and Monetary Union,

HAVE AGREED on the following provisions, which shall be annexed to the Treaty establishing the European Community:

1. The Danish Government shall notify the Council of its position concerning participation in the third stage before the Council makes its assessment under Article 109j(2) of this Treaty.

2. In the event of a notification that Denmark will not participate in the third stage, Denmark shall have an exemption. The effect of the exemption shall be that all Articles and provisions of this Treaty and the Statute of the ESCB referring to a derogation shall be applicable to Denmark.

3. In such case, Denmark shall not be included among the majority of Member States which fulfil the necessary conditions referred to in the second indent of Article 109j(2) and the first indent of Article 109j(3) of this Treaty.

4. As for the abrogation of the exemption, the procedure referred to in Article 109k(2) shall only be initiated at the request of Denmark.

5. In the event of abrogation of the exemption status, the provisions of this Protocol shall cease to apply.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1606 

KA 09-00321 

PRESENT: MARTOCHE, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND SCONIERS, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ROY HOOTEN, ALSO KNOWN AS ROY D. HOOTEN,

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

(APPEAL NO. 2.) 

 

GARY A. HORTON, PUBLIC DEFENDER, BATAVIA (BRIDGET L. FIELD OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

LAWRENCE FRIEDMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATAVIA (WILLIAM G. ZICKL OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Genesee County Court (Robert C.

Noonan, J.), rendered January 13, 2009. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted burglary in the third

degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Same Memorandum as in People v Hooten ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d

___ [Feb. 10, 2011]).

Entered: February 10, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
# EUR-Lex - 12004V/AFI/DCL/50 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V/AFI/DCL/50

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - FINAL ACT - B. Declarations concerning Protocols annexed to the Constitution - Declarations by Member States - 50.Declaration by the Republic of Latvia and the Republic of Hungary on the spelling of the name of the single currency in the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0474 - 0474 *

50. Declaration by the Republic of Latvia and the Republic of Hungary on the spelling of the name of the single currency in the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe

Without prejudice to the unified spelling of the name of the single currency of the European Union referred to in the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe as displayed on the banknotes and on the coins, Latvia and Hungary declare that the spelling of the name of the single currency, including its derivatives as applied throughout the Latvian and Hungarian text of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, has no effect on the existing rules of the Latvian and the Hungarian languages.

--------------------------------------------------
#### §§ 95.737-95.739 [Reserved]
# EUR-Lex - 12002E233 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E233

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Five: Institutions of the Community - Title I: Provisions governing the institutions - Chapter 1: The institutions - Section 4: The Court of Justice - Article 233 - Article 176 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - Article 176 - EEC Treaty **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0127 - 0127 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0273 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0062 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Five: Institutions of the Community

Title I: Provisions governing the institutions

Chapter 1: The institutions

Section 4: The Court of Justice

Article 233

Article 176 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 176 - EEC Treaty

Article 233

The institution or institutions whose act has been declared void or whose failure to act has been declared contrary to this Treaty shall be required to take the necessary measures to comply with the judgment of the Court of Justice.

This obligation shall not affect any obligation which may result from the application of the second paragraph of Article 288.

This article shall also apply to the ECB.
This publication is available from the NASA Center for AeroSpace Information, 301–621–0390.

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

2. REPORT DATE

19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION

 OF ABSTRACT

18. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION

 OF THIS PAGE

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources,

gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this

collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson

Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503.

NSN 7540-01-280-5500 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 2-89)

Prescribed by ANSI Std. Z39-18

298-102

Form Approved

OMB No. 0704-0188

12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE

8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION

 REPORT NUMBER

5. FUNDING NUMBERS

3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED

4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE

6. AUTHOR(S)

7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)

11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES

12a. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

13. ABSTRACT (Maximum 200 words)

14. SUBJECT TERMS

17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION

 OF REPORT

16. PRICE CODE

15. NUMBER OF PAGES

20. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT

Unclassified Unclassified

Technical Memorandum

Unclassified

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Lewis Research Center

Cleveland, Ohio 44135–3191

1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank)

10. SPONSORING/MONITORING

 AGENCY REPORT NUMBER

9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Washington, DC 20546–0001

Available electronically at http://gltrs.grc.nasa.gov/GLTRS

May 1986

NASA TM–87236

E–2909

WU–505–63–01–00

22

A03

How to Evaluate Solid Lubricant Films Using

a Pin-on-Disk Tribometer

Robert L. Fusaro

Friction; Wear; Solid lubricant coatings; Tribometers; Wear devices; Testing techniques

Unclassified -Unlimited

Subject Category: 27

Prepared for the 1986 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Lubrication Engineers, Toronto, Canada,

May 12–15, 1986.

Over the years, the author has evaluated and compared hundreds of solid lubricant films using a pin-on-disk tribometer.

The intent of this paper is to describe to the reader experimental techniques and some of parameters that have been

observed to be important for the evaluation and development of new solid lubricant films. Pin-on-disk tribometers will be

described and discussed as will experimental methods for evaluating solid lubricant materials. Methods of preparing

surfaces for the coating of the films and different methods for applying the films will be reviewed. Factors that affect

solid lubricant performance will also be discussed. Two different macroscopic mechanisms of solid lubricant film wear

exist. These will be characterized schematically, and methods of measuring wear will be examined.
# EUR-Lex - 11957A198 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957A198

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY ( E.A.E.C. - EURATOM ), TITLE FIVE - GENERAL PROVISIONS, ARTICLE 198 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 198

SAVE AS OTHERWISE PROVIDED , THIS TREATY SHALL APPLY TO THE EUROPEAN TERRITORIES OF MEMBER STATES AND TO NON-EUROPEAN TERRITORIES UNDER THEIR JURISDICTION .

IT SHALL ALSO APPLY TO THE EUROPEAN TERRITORIES FOR WHOSE EXTERNAL RELATIONS A MEMBER STATE IS RESPONSIBLE .
# Comptroller's Licensing Manual & Forms

Share This Page:

The Comptroller's Licensing Manual consists of a series of booklets that explain the OCC's policies and procedures on key licensing topics. The OCC recommends reading the booklet before accessing the sample documents.

## Browse the Comptroller's Licensing Manual

### Recently Published Booklets

No recent publications

        -  				Expand All				 
        -  				Collapse All				 

### BookletsShow

### Companion PublicationsShow

### OTS Document ArchiveShow

OTS Document Archive
AFS-10-040-E April 1, 2010 Exemption No. 10046 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2009-0988

Mr. Kevin R. Bruce Diamond Aircraft Industries, Inc.

1560 Crumlin Sideroad London, Ontario

N5V 1S2

Dear Mr. Bruce:

This letter is to inform you that we have denied your petition for exemption. It transmits our decision and explains its basis.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated October 15, 2009, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Diamond Aircraft Industries, Inc. (Diamond Aircraft), for an exemption from §§ 61.31(e), 61.123(g), and 61.129(a)(3)(ii) of T itle 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow Diamond Aircraft to use certain fixed gear airplanes for the conduct of a commercial pilot practical test (§ 61.123(g)) as well as to conduct some of the required training for a commercial pilot certificate (§ 61.129(a)(3)(ii)).

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent.

The FAA recently issued a denial of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Denial of Exemption No. 10005 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that there is insufficient safety data regarding the use of the portable training device (U.S. Patent 6,638,071) in a non-complex single-engine land airplane to determine that equivalent level of safety would be achieved when used during training and during the practical test phase of airmen certification under part 61 subpart F-- Commercial

Pilots . However, the FAA is in the process of collecting safety data from Mr. Gregg2

Stockman (Exemption No. 9778A) regarding the conduct of commercial pilot training and the commercial pilot practical test using the portable training device with U.S. Patent No. 6,638,071.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

• they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed denial of exemption;

• the reasons stated by the FAA for denying the enclosed exemption also apply to the situation you present; and

• a grant of exemption would not be in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby deny your petition on behalf of Diamond Aircraft Industries, Inc., for an exemption from 14 CFR §§ 61.31(e), 61.123(g), and 61.129(a)(3)(ii).

Sincerely,

/s/ Raymond Towles Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service

Enclosure
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 20337 Summary Calendar

WILLIS FLOYD WILEY,

Plaintiff

- Appellant

v. DR. BHUPATRAI G. VACHHANI,

Defendant

- Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:13

- CV

- 3712

Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: * We have considered the briefs, the record on appeal, and all relevant law, and we conclude that the district court’s judgment should be affirmed essentially for the reasons articulated in the district court’s opinion of April 28,
2014

. The appellant’s arg uments on appeal are without merit.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 4 7.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 2, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-20337 Document: 00512922876 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/02/2015No. 14

- 20337 First, the appellant argues that the district court erred in dismissing his case for failure to prosecute or for failing to comply with a court order or rule of civil procedure

. But the district court did no such thing. The district court dismissed the case because the appellant did not assert a valid legal claim. The appellant’s arguments in this regard appear irrelevant. Second, t he appellant argues that the appellee, a doctor , was a “state actor” who may be sued under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 because he worked under contract with the Social Security Administration. Section 1983 provides a right of action against persons who act “under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, cust om, or usage, of any State

. ” ( E mphasis added). The Social Security Administration, however, is a part of the federal government, not the
state. There is no allegation in this case that the appellee acted under color of

state law. T he district court was correct to dismiss the § 1983 claim. See Case
v. Milewski , 327 F.3d 564, 567 (7th Cir. 2003) (“[A] n action brought pursuant to § 1983 cannot lie against federal officers acting under color of federal law .”). Third, the appellant argues that he asserted a valid legal claim under title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the district court erred in dismissing it

. Title II, however, addresses disability discrimination by state public entities. See 42 U.S.C. § 12131(1) ; Cellular Phone Taskforce v. F.C.C. , 217 F.3d 72, 73 (2d Cir. 2000) (“Title II of the ADA is not applicable to the federal government.”)

. The appellant’s grievances with the federal Social Security Administration and the doctor it hired do not fall under t he statute

. The district court was correct to dismiss the title II claim. Fourth, the appellant challenges the district court’s failure to grant his motion for summary judgment. Because the appellant did not assert any valid legal claim, he is not entitl ed to summary judgment

. The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 14-20337 Document: 00512922876 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/02/2015
EXHIBIT 32-1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing
     Tax Credit Fund VI, L.P., Series 7 (the "Partnership") for the period ended
     December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on
     the date hereof (the "Report"), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as
     adopted  pursuant  to section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  I,
     Wilfred N. Cooper,  Jr.,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer of WNC &
     Associates,   Inc.,   general   partner  of  the  General  Partner  of  the
     Partnership, hereby certify that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,   the  financial  condition  and  result  of  operations  of  the
     Partnership.




/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
Date:  November 10, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          21,650
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    49
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    236,298
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          35,223
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            36,645
<LOANS>                                        761,027
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (6,617)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,081,618
<DEPOSITS>                                     747,047
<SHORT-TERM>                                    12,300
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              9,789
<LONG-TERM>                                    227,149
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        63,343
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,990
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,081,618
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 64,697
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               18,863
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,009
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                84,569
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              33,362
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              48,256
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           36,313
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,221
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  88
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 26,702
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,306
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      10,770
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,770
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.71
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.13
<LOANS-NON>                                        832
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,394
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 6,599
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  (1,772)
<RECOVERIES>                                       569
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                6,617
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             6,617
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the quarterly  report on Form 10-Q of I/OMagic
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report"),
the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition and  results of operations of the Company.


Dated: May 19, 2003                By:  /s/ Tony Shahbaz
                                       -----------------
                                       Tony Shahbaz,
                                       Chief Executive Officer


     In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of I/OMagic
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report"),
the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects,  the  financial  condition and  results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: May 19, 2003               By:  /s/ Steve Gillings
                                       ------------------
                                       Steve Gillings,
                                       Chief Financial Officer



     A signed original of these written statements required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.