alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                           2,979
<SECURITIES>                                    11,388
<RECEIVABLES>                                   77,778
<ALLOWANCES>                                       765
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  96,347
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         38,651
<COMMON>                                           100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        356
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,451
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    96,347
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,577
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,053
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   445
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,251
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    827
<INCOME-TAX>                                       240
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                587
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       587
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    27.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    27.85
        

</TABLE>
§ 37.25 Revision. ( a ) A permittee may request the Regional Director for permission to revise its approved exploration plan. Until the Regional Director grants the permittee's request, no revision of its exploration plan shall be implemented. Such request shall be deemed to be granted on the 10th working day following its receipt unless the Regional Director denies the request; advises the permittee that the proposed revision is major and, therefore, must satisfy the publication and hearing requirements of § 37.22(b) before it can be acted upon; by timely written notice extends the period for considering the request; conditionally approves the proposed revision with such modifications as he stipulates are necessary and appropriate; or, unconditionally approves the proposed revision within a shorter period. No revision of an exploration plan shall be approved that is inconsistent with the Act or this part. Approval of any revision is subject to the conditions stated in § 37.22(d) to the extent that they are pertinent.
( b ) Upon 10 working days advance notice to the Regional Director of its proposed revision, or within such lesser period as may be concurred in by the Regional Director, a permittee may implement a revision of its plan of operation, provided that such revision is consistent with the exploration plan to which the plan of operation pertains and this part. The Regional Director may require the permittee to defer, modify, or rescind such revision whenever he determines that such action is necessary and appropriate to ensure such consistency.
( c ) Reconsideration of the Regional Director's actions under this section may be obtained by employing the procedures described in § 37.22(c). A request for reconsideration shall not operate to stay the Regional Director's actions unless such stay is granted in writing by the Director.
§ 424.01 Scope and purpose. ( a ) Part 424 provides regulations for revising the Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants and designating or revising the critical habitats of listed species. Part 424 provides criteria for determining whether species are endangered or threatened species and for designating critical habitats. Part 424 also establishes procedures for receiving and considering petitions to revise the lists and for conducting periodic reviews of listed species.
( b ) The purpose of the regulations in part 424 is to interpret and implement those portions of the Act that pertain to the listing of species as threatened or endangered species and the designation of critical habitat.
[81 FR 7438, Feb. 11, 2016]
§ 222.501 Definitions. ( a ) The term *experimental population* means any introduced and/or designated population (including any off-spring arising solely therefrom) that has been so designated in accordance with the procedures of this subpart but only when, and at such times as, the population is wholly separate geographically from nonexperimental populations of the same species. Where part of an experimental population overlaps with nonexperimental populations of the same species on a particular occasion, but is wholly separate at other times, specimens of the experimental population will not be recognized as such while in the area of overlap. That is, experimental status will only be recognized outside the areas of overlap. Thus, such a population shall be treated as experimental only when the times of geographic separation are reasonably predictable; e.g., fixed migration patterns, natural or man-made barriers. A population is not treated as experimental if total separation will occur solely as a result of random and unpredictable events.
( b ) The term *essential experimental population* means an experimental population whose loss would be likely to appreciably reduce the likelihood of the survival of the species in the wild. All other experimental populations are to be classified as *nonessential.*
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

Chase Bank USA, National Association

First USA Credit Card Master Trust

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Chase Bank USA, National Association (the Bank), as Servicer, pursuant to the Third Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as
of December 19, 2007 (as amended and supplemented from time to time, the Agreement) between the Bank, as transferor and servicer (in such capacity, the Servicer) and BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware as trustee, does hereby
certify that:



| | 1. | The Bank is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A review of the Servicers activities during the calendar year ended December 31, 2012 (the Reporting Period) and of its performance under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the
Reporting Period.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate this 29th day of March 2013.



CHASE BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as ServicerBy:

/s/ David A. PenkrotName: David A. PenkrotTitle:   Senior Vice President
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

In re: 

Carla Anderson

Debtor(s)

Case No. 16 B 24877

CHAPTER 13 STANDING TRUSTEE’S FINAL REPORT AND ACCOUNT

Marilyn O. Marshall, chapter 13 trustee, submits the following Final Report and Account 

of the administration of the estate pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1302(b)(1). The trustee declares as 

follows:

1) The case was filed on 08/02/2016.

2) The plan was confirmed on NA .

3) The plan was modified by order after confirmation pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1329 on

NA .

4) The trustee filed action to remedy default by the debtor in performance under the plan 

on NA .

5) The case was Dismissed on 09/20/2016.

6) Number of months from filing to last payment: 0.

7) Number of months case was pending: 4.

8) Total value of assets abandoned by court order: NA .

9) Total value of assets exempted: NA .

10) Amount of unsecured claims discharged without payment: $0.00.

11) All checks distributed by the trustee relating to this case have cleared the bank.

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (9/1/2009)

Case 16-24877 Doc 15 Filed 11/21/16 Entered 11/21/16 18:13:03 Desc Page 1

 of 3
Receipts:

Total paid by or on behalf of the debtor $0.00

Less amount refunded to debtor $0.00

NET RECEIPTS: $0.00

Expenses of Administration:

Attorney’s Fees Paid Through the Plan $0.00

Court Costs $0.00

Trustee Expenses & Compensation $0.00

Other $0.00

TOTAL EXPENSES OF ADMINISTRATION: $0.00

Attorney fees paid and disclosed by debtor: $0.00

Scheduled Creditors:

Creditor

Name Class

Claim

Scheduled

Claim

Asserted

Claim

Allowed

Int.

Paid

Principal

Paid

Summary of Disbursements to Creditors:

Secured Payments:

Mortgage Ongoing

Mortgage Arrearage

Debt Secured by Vehicle

All Other Secured

TOTAL SECURED:

Priority Unsecured Payments:

Domestic Support Arrearage

Domestic Support Ongoing

All Other Priority

TOTAL PRIORITY:

GENERAL UNSECURED PAYMENTS:

Claim

Allowed

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Principal

Paid

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Interest

Paid

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (9/1/2009)

Case 16-24877 Doc 15 Filed 11/21/16 Entered 11/21/16 18:13:03 Desc Page 2

 of 3
Disbursements:

Expenses of Administration $0.00

Disbursements to Creditors $0.00

TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS : $0.00

12) The trustee certifies that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 5009, 

the estate has been fully administered, the foregoing summary is true and complete, and all 

administrative matters for which the trustee is responsible have been completed. The trustee 

requests a final decree be entered that discharges the trustee and grants such other relief as may 

be just and proper.

Dated: 11/21/2016

STATEMENT: This Unified Form is associated with an open bankruptcy case, therefore, Paperwork Reduction 

Act exemption 5 C.F.R. § 1320.4(a)(2) applies.

By:/s/ Marilyn O. Marshall

Trustee

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (9/1/2009)

Case 16-24877 Doc 15 Filed 11/21/16 Entered 11/21/16 18:13:03 Desc Page 3

 of 3
#### § 453.02 Definitions.

Definitions applicable to this part are contained in 50 CFR 450.01.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6715

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ALVIN B. TRUESDALE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior

District Judge. (CR-92-34, CA-96-109)

Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: December 31, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alvin B. Truesdale, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Davis Bell, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant

a certificate of appealability and affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. United States v. Truesdale, Nos. CR-92-34; CA-96-

109 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 17, 1996). However, because the district court

did not afford Appellant notice and an opportunity to be heard with

respect to the imposition of the system of prefiling review, see In

re Oliver, 682 F.2d 443, 446 (3d Cir. 1982), we modify the district

court's order to strike the portion of the order conditioning

Appellant's future filings in the District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina upon his obtaining leave of court. We

deny as meritless Appellant's motion for determination of status

and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  ss.1350),
the  undersigned,  George J. Longo,  the Chief Financial  Officer of The Quigley
Corporation,  a Nevada corporation (the "Company"),  does hereby certify, to his
knowledge, that:

The  Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the year  ended  December  31,  2004 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information  contained in
the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                                                       /s/  George J. Longo
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       George J. Longo
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                                       March 31, 2005
```
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  ss.1350),
the  undersigned,  Guy J. Quigley,  the Chief  Executive  Officer of The Quigley
Corporation,  a Nevada corporation (the "Company"),  does hereby certify, to his
knowledge, that:

The  Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the year  ended  December  31,  2006 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information  contained in
the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                                                         /s/ Guy J. Quigley
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Guy J. Quigley
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                                         March 12, 2007
```
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5103

To amend title 31, United States Code, to provide for an Executive Director

of the General Accounting Office Personnel Appeals Board, and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 26, 1994

Mr. MCCLOSKEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

A BILL

To amend title 31, United States Code, to provide for an

Executive Director of the General Accounting Office Personnel Appeals Board, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR.

4 (a) POSITION.—Section 752 of title 31, United States

5 Code, is amended by adding at the end thereof the follow6 ing new subsection:

7 ‘‘(c)(1) The Comptroller General shall appoint the

8 Executive Director of the Board.
2

•HR 5103 IH

1 ‘‘(2) The Chairman shall fix the pay of the Executive

2 Director. The rate of basic pay of the Executive Director

3 shall be not less than 120 percent of the minimum rate

4 of basic pay payable for GS–15 of the General Schedule

5 and not greater than the rate of basic pay payable for

6 level IV of the Executive Schedule.

7 ‘‘(3) The Executive Director is the chief administra8 tive officer for the Board and performs such tasks as the

9 Chair assigns.’’.

10 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—(1) The heading

11 for section 752 of such title is amended to read as follows:

12 ‘‘§ 752. Chairman, General Counsel, and Executive

13 Director’’.

14 (2) The table of sections for chapter 7 of such title

15 is amended by amending the item relating to section 752

16 to read as follows:

‘‘752. Chairman, General Counsel, and Executive Director.’’.

17 SEC. 2. PAY RATE FOR GENERAL COUNSEL.

18 The second sentence of section 752(b)(2) of title 31,

19 United States Code, is amended to read as follows: ‘‘The

20 rate of basic pay of the General Counsel shall be not less

21 than 120 percent of the minimum rate of basic pay pay22 able for GS–15 of the General Schedule and not greater

23 than the rate of basic pay payable for level IV of the Exec24 utive Schedule.’’.
3

•HR 5103 IH

1 SEC. 3. PARTICIPATION IN THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE

2 HEALTH CARE PROGRAM.

3 Section 732 of title 31, United States Code, is

4 amended by adding at the end thereof the following new

5 subsection:

6 ‘‘(h) The Comptroller General may enter into inter7 agency agreements with the Department of State and

8 other executive agencies to permit the General Accounting

9 Office to participate in programs for the provision of

10 health care to government employees stationed abroad or

11 performing temporary duty abroad.’’.

Æ
Home
About
2020 Federal View Point Survey Results
	About DTIC
	Administrator
	Announcements
	Contact Us
	DTIC’s Past and Future
	DTIC Strategic Plan
	Employment
	Sitemap
Products & Services
DTIC’s Products & Services
	DTIC Registration Benefits
	DTIC Combatant Command (CCMD) Classified Reading Room
	Training
Submit Documents
Sign In
Operating Status
 Defense Technical Information Center
				*Search this site, DoD S&T Reports, and more..*

**Internet Explorer Users:** It is recommended that you use the Google Chrome or Microsoft Edge browser for an optimal experience with this application as Microsoft’s support for Internet Explorer is ending.
	DISMISS Archive for  September 2020 EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY: New submission requirements for DoD-funded journal articles
		September 24, 2020Read More
 Recent Posts
		DTIC Journal Article Is Published
											April 16, 2021
											DTIC publishes special edition of peer-reviewed scientific journal JDR&E
											November 12, 2020
											CUI marking framework guidance now available.
											November 10, 2020
											EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY: New submission requirements for DoD-funded journal articles
											September 24, 2020
											House Appropriations Committee Report on the Defense Appropriations Act for FY2021
											July 21, 2020 Archives
			April 2021
	November 2020
	September 2020
	July 2020
	February 2020
	January 2020
	December 2019
	September 2019
	August 2019
	June 2019
	April 2019
	March 2019
	February 2019
	January 2019
	September 2018
	August 2018
	July 2018
	January 2018
	February 2017
 **DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER**
8725 John J. Kingman Road
Fort Belvoir, Virginia 22060-6218
(800) 225-3842https://Discover.DTIC.mil
			AdministratorContact UsDoD Privacy ProgramEEOEmploymentFOIAInformation Analysis Centers
			Information QualityLegalMission StatementNo FEAR ActOpen GovernmentPlain Language
			Policy MemorandaPrivacy PolicySAPRStrategic PlanSubmit DocumentsUSA.govUSD(R&E)
			LinkedIn

NOTICE:  The appearance of hyperlinks does not constitute endorsement by the DTIC of non-U.S. Government sites or the information, products, or services contained therein.  Although the DTIC may or may not use these sites as additional distribution channels for Department of Defense information, it does not exercise editorial control over all of the information that you may find at these locations.  Such hyperlinks are provided consistent with the stated purpose of this website. The DTIC bears no responsibility for the accuracy, legality or content of the external website or for that of subsequent links. Contact the external website for answers to questions regarding its content. Please let us know about existing external links which you believe are inappropriate.
# EUR-Lex - 11957E056 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957E056

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY, PART TWO - FOUNDATIONS OF THE COMMUNITY, TITLE III - FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS, SERVICES AND CAPITAL, CHAPTER 2: RIGHT OF ESTABLISHMENT, ARTICLE 56 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 56

1 . THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND MEASURES TAKEN IN PURSUANCE THEREOF SHALL NOT PREJUDICE THE APPLICABILITY OF PROVISIONS LAID DOWN BY LAW , REGULATION OR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION PROVIDING FOR SPECIAL TREATMENT FOR FOREIGN NATIONALS ON GROUNDS OF PUBLIC POLICY , PUBLIC SECURITY OR PUBLIC HEALTH .

2 . BEFORE THE END OF THE TRANSITIONAL PERIOD , THE COUNCIL SHALL , ACTING UNANIMOUSLY ON A PROPOSAL FROM THE COMMISSION AND AFTER CONSULTING THE ASSEMBLY , ISSUE DIRECTIVES FOR THE COORDINATION OF THE AFOREMENTIONED PROVISIONS LAID DOWN BY LAW , REGULATION OR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION . AFTER THE END OF THE SECOND STAGE , HOWEVER , THE COUNCIL SHALL , ACTING BY A QUALIFIED MAJORITY ON A PROPOSAL FROM THE COMMISSION , ISSUE DIRECTIVES FOR THE COORDINATION OF SUCH PROVISIONS AS , IN EACH MEMBER STATE , ARE A MATTER FOR REGULATION OR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION .
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

Mercury Interactive (Israel) Limited, incorporated under the laws of Israel

Mercury Interactive (UK) LTD., incorporated under the laws of the United
Kingdom

Mercury Interactive France SARL, incorporated under the laws of France

Mercury Interactive GmbH, incorporated under the laws of Germany

Mercury Interactive (Europe) BV, incorporated under the laws of The Netherlands

Mercury Interactive (Canada) Inc., incorporated under the laws of Canada

Mercury Interactive Japan K.K., incorporated under the laws of Japan

Mercury Interactive (Australia) Pty ltd., incorporated under laws of Australia

Mercury Interactive (Singapore) LTD., incorporated under the laws of Singapore