alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1539/2005

of 22 September 2005         

extending the emergency measures for the protection and recovery of the anchovy stock in ICES sub-area VIII

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 of 20 December 2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the common fisheries policy (1) and in particular Article 7(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Fishing for anchovy in ICES sub-area VIII shall be prohibited. In ICES sub-area VIII it shall also be prohibited to retain on board, to tranship or land anchovy during the period of application of this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from 3 October 2005 until 31 December 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 September 2005.

For the Commission

Joe BORG            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 358, 31.12.2002, p. 59.

(2)OJ L 171, 2.7.2005, p. 24.

----
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 1 5 , 20 12

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________
NO. 14

- 12

- 00 079

- CV

____________ MARCUS MARQUIS PRUITT , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 180th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1201763



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

This i s an appeal from the December 15 , 2011 denial of appellant’s motion for the
return of seized property

. 1 The clerk’s record was filed February 9 , 20 12

. No reporter’s

record was taken in the court below

. Appellant’s brief was due March 12, 2012, but it was

1 Appellant was convicted of possession of between four and 200 grams of cocaine with the intent to deliver and sentenced to thirty

- five years in prison. See Pruitt v. State, 2011 WL 2120116

, No. 14

- 10

- 00357

- CR (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] May 24, 2011, pet. ref’d) (not designated for publication). This court affirmed his conviction. Id. According to his motion, $901 was seized from appellant when he was arrested, and the State has not instituted forfeitur e proceedings. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 59.01

— .14

. Appellant seeks return of the money seized at his arrest. Cases under article 59 proceed as civil actions. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 59.05(b).2

not filed. On March 14, 2012, this court notified appellant that his brief was past due.
Appellant did not file a brief , motion for extension of time to file his brief, or any other response to the court’s notice.

On April 17 , 20 12 , this c ourt issued an order stating that unless appellant filed a

brief on or before April 30

, 20 12 , the c ourt would dismiss the appeal for want of

pro secution. See Tex. R. App. P . 42.3(b). Appellant filed no response.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justice s Frost, Seymore, and McCally

.
**Exhibit 10.47**

**AMENDMENT NO. 1**

**DEL MONTE FOODS COMPANY**

**ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN**

The Del MonteFoods Company Annual Incentive Plan, as amended and restated effective April 28, 2003 (the “Plan”) is hereby amended pursuant to Section 11 of the Plan effective as of **January 1, 2005**. 

This Amendment is intended to be a good faith, interim amendment for the purposes of good faith compliance with Internal Revenue Code Section 409A (“Section409A”) and the guidance issued thereunder, including the transition period provisions. The Plan and this Amendment may be amended in whole or in part by the end of the applicable transition period under Section 409A and applicable to allor any part of the period from January 1, 2005 until the end of the transition period. Notwithstanding this Amendment, the Plan may be administered during the transition period for Section 409A in good faith compliance with any provisionsof Section 409A or the guidance thereunder or any reasonable good faith interpretation thereof. 

**1.**

**Section 3** is amended by adding at the end of the last sentence in the first paragraph the following: 

as soon as practicable after such event, provided such award is not otherwise subject to adjustment for performance. 

**2.**

**Section 11** is amendedby deleting the second paragraph and replacing it with the following: 

Payment of awards will be made as soon as practicable after approvalby the Committee but in no event later than the July 15 following the Plan Year for which the award is made to eligible participants. Notwithstanding the foregoing, delay of such payment may be made if permitted in accordance with CodeSection 409A in a manner that does not trigger an excise tax under such section and otherwise complies with the “short term deferral” exception to such section. 

**3.**

**Section 11** is amended by adding a new paragraph at the end asfollows: 

For purposes of good faith compliance with Code Section 409A, the Plan is intended to comply with Prop. Reg.§ 1.409A-2(a)(5) for fiscal year compensation under a fiscal year plan and Prop. Reg. § 1.409A-2(a)(7) for performance-based compensation, as the Committee may determine appropriate from time to time. 

**4.**

Except as specifically amended herein, the terms of the Plan shall continue in full force and effect. 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Amendment No. 1 to be adopted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Del Monte Foods Company and executed by its duly designated officer. 

 
DEL MONTE CORPORATIONBy: 
/s/ Mark J. Buxton
 Mark J. Buxton Vice President, Human Resources
Date of Signing: December 14, 2006 

 

2
§ 259.7 Annual deposit and withdrawal reports required. ( a ) The Secretary will require from each party an annual deposit and withdrawal report for each CCF depository. Failure to submit such reports may be cause for involuntary termination of the party's Agreement. ( 1 ) A final deposit and withdrawal report at the end of the tax year, which shall be submitted not later than 30 days after expiration of the due date, for filing the party's Federal income tax return. The report must be made on a form prescribed by the Secretary using a separate form for each CCF depository.
( 2 ) Each report must bear a certification that the deposit and withdrawal information given includes all annual deposit and withdrawal activity for each CCF depository. Negative reports must be submitted in those cases where there is no deposit and/or withdrawal activity.
( b ) The Secretary, at his or her discretion, may, after due notice, disqualify withdrawals and/or involuntarily terminate the Agreement for the participant's failure to submit the required annual deposit and withdrawal reports.
( c ) Additionally, each party shall submit, not later than 30 days after expiration of the party's tax due date, a copy of the party's Federal Income Tax Return filed with IRS for the preceding tax year. Failure to submit the Federal Income Tax Return shall, after due notice, be cause for the same adverse action specified in paragraph (b) of this section.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned is the Chief Executive Officer of China Water Group, Inc.  This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.  This Certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of China Water Group, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2012.

The undersigned certifies that such 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of China Water Group, Inc. as of June 30, 2012.

This Certification is executed as of September 1, 2015.

/s/ Wenge Fang

     Wenge Fang

     Chief Executive Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"18-1264: JAMES v. WILKIE [OPINION], Precedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"EG7vtBoww0\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/3-07-2019-18-1264-james-v-wilkie-opinion-precedential-18-1264-opinion-3-7-2019\/\">18-1264: JAMES v. WILKIE [OPINION], Precedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/3-07-2019-18-1264-james-v-wilkie-opinion-precedential-18-1264-opinion-3-7-2019\/embed\/#?secret=EG7vtBoww0\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“18-1264: JAMES v. WILKIE [OPINION], Precedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"EG7vtBoww0\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Opinions\/Orders posted: JAMES v. WILKIE [OPINION](pdf) Appeal Number: 18-1264 Origin: CAVC Precedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
§ 22.353 Blanketing interference. Licensees of Public Mobile Services stations are responsible for resolving cases of blanketing interference in accordance with the provisions of this section. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, licensees must resolve any cases of blanketing interference in their area of responsibility caused by operation of their transmitter(s) during a one-year period following commencement of service from new or modified transmitter(s). Interference must be resolved promptly at no cost to the complainant.
( b ) The area of responsibility is that area in the immediate vicinity of the transmitting antenna of stations where the field strength of the electromagnetic radiation from such stations equals or exceeds 115 dBμV/m. To determine the radial distance to the boundary of this area, the following formula must be used: where d is the radial distance to the boundary, in kilometers p is the radial effective radiated power, in kilowatts
The maximum effective radiated power in the pertinent direction, without consideration of the antenna's vertical radiation pattern or height, must be used in the formula.
( c ) Licensees are not required to resolve blanketing interference to mobile receivers or non-RF devices or blanketing interference occurring as a result of malfunctioning or mistuned receivers, improperly installed consumer antenna systems, or the use of high gain antennas or antenna booster amplifiers by consumers.
( d ) Licensees that install transmitting antennas at a location where there are already one or more transmitting antennas are responsible for resolving any new cases of blanketing interference in accordance with this section.
( e ) Two or more licensees that concurrently install transmitting antennas at the same location are jointly responsible for resolving blanketing interference cases, unless the FCC can readily determine which station is causing the interference, in which case the licensee of that station is held fully responsible.
( f ) After the one year period of responsibility to resolve blanketing interference, licensees must provide upon request technical information to complainants on remedies for blanketing interference.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22

- 0724 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JAY LE CLEVELAND,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER**
Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is given an extension of time until April 26, 2024, to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s reply brief. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 21 2024

03/21/2024
An official website of the United States government "Here is how you know"


Official websites use.gov  .gov
 Secure .gov websites use HTTPS 
	A lock https:


Menu
        ABOUTDirector's Corner
Contact COPS
Community Policing in Action: Photo Contest
The L. Anthony Sutin Award for Innovative Law Enforcement and Community Partnerships
Photo Galleries
Subscribe
NEWSPress Releases
Executive Order on Advancing Effective, Accountable Policing and Criminal Justice Practices to Enhance Public Trust and Public Safety
GRANTSSolicitation Finder
Funding Opportunities
How To Apply
Grants Deadlines and Announcement Dates
Compliance and Reporting
Program Documents
Grantee Success Stories
Award Announcement Map
RESOURCESCritical Incident Review: Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, TX
National Blue Alert Network
Resource Center/Publications
E-Newsletter: Community Policing Dispatch
Podcast Series: The Beat
Video Series: What’s New in Blue
Tribal Community Policing Resources
Community Policing Topics
Community Violence Intervention
Addressing Human TraffickingLabor Trafficking
Recruitment, Hiring & Retention
Filing a Civil Rights Complaint
TRAINING & TECHNICAL ASSISTANCECollaborative Reform InitiativeCRI-TAC
Critical Response
Organizational Assessments
COPS Training Portal
Training
ACCOUNT ACCESS
 Search form
    Search






Anti-Heroin Task Force (AHTF) Awards                                                  AWARD ANNOUNCEMENT DOCUMENTS

Award List

Award Owner's Manual

AHTF Post-Award Fact Sheet

AHTF Methodology

AWARD MANAGEMENT DOCUMENTS

Background Investigation FAQs
	SF-425 Fact Sheet
	SF-425 Helpful Hints

Tips for Financial Managers to complete FFRs
	Consultant Contractor Fact Sheet
	Sole Source Justification Fact Sheet

***For additional assistance, we encourage you to visit the Award Management Materials Page, where you will find frequently asked questions, additional fact sheets, links to webinars, and other resources.***


SPOTLIGHT


SUBSCRIBE TO EMAIL UPDATES
 
 SUBSCRIBE TO CP DISPATCH


ABOUT Contact COPS
	Community Policing in Action: Photo Contest
	The L. Anthony Sutin Award for Innovative Law Enforcement and Community Partnerships
	Photo Galleries
	Subscribe NEWS Press Releases
	Executive Order on Safe Policing for Safer Communities
 GRANTS Compliance & Reporting
	Program Documents
	Grantees
	Grantee Success Stories
	Agency Portal Video Tutorials
	Award Announcement Map RESOURCES National Blue Alert Network
	Recent Releases
	Resource Center/Publications
	E-Newsletter: Community Policing Dispatch
	Podcast Series: The Beat
	Video Series: What’s New in Blue
	Tribal Community Policing Resources
	Addressing Human Trafficking
	Community Policing Topics
	Recruitment, Hiring & Retention
 TRAINING & TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Collaborative Reform Initiative for Technical Assistance Center
	COPS Training Portal
	Training ACCOUNT ACCESS ACCESSIBILITY INFORMATION


FOIA Language Access Plan Legal Policies and Disclaimers No Fear Act Open Government Plain Writing Privacy Policy USA.gov Whistleblower Protection Social Media Department of Justice Accessibility
EXHIBIT
      32.1


Section
      1350 Certification





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SUNRISE REAL ESTATE GROUP, INC. (the
      "Company") on Form 10−Q for the three and nine months ended September
      30, 2008 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes−Oxley Act of 2002 that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request and for the periods
      indicated.





Date:
                November 19, 2008
            By:/s/
                Lin, Chi-JungLin,
                Chi-Jung, Chief Executive OfficerDate:
                November 19, 2008
            By:/s/
                Wang, Wen-YanWang,
                Wen-Yan, Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
10.3


 


ADDENDUM
#1 FOR RELATED SERVICES TO THE AGREEMENT


 


This
ADDENDUM #1 FOR RELATED SERVICES TO THE AGREEMENT (the “Addendum”) is effective this 20th
day of July 2020 (“Addendum Effective Date”) by and between Mateon
Therapeutics INC., a Delaware corporation with its principal office at 29397 Agoura Rd., Suite 107, Agoura Hills, CA 91301,
USA (“Mateon”) and IMPATIENS N.V. acting under the trade name myTomorrows,
a company formed and registered under the laws of the Netherlands, and located at Anthony Fokkerweg 61, 1059 CP, Amsterdam, The
Netherlands (“Impatients”) will be incorporated into the Expanded Access Program (EAP) Master Services
Agreement between Mateon and Impatients dated 30th May 2020 (the “Agreement”). Capitalized
terms used in this Statement of Work will have the same meaning as set forth in the Agreement.


 


In
addition to the EAP services that follow from the Agreement, Mateon wishes to hereby separately engage Impatients for the provision
of the following Services (as defined below):


 


	 	1.	Services.


 


Impatients
shall, at its sole discretion, support Mateon with the application process for a clinical trial of the Product in the United Kingdom
(“Services”). The Services shall include:


 


	 	●	Regulatory
    writing support
	 	●	Submission
    support


 


	 	2.	Fees.


 


Impatients
shall provide the Services under this Addendum free of charge.


 





	MATEON
    THERAPEUTICS, INC.	 	IMPATIENTS
    N.V. acting under the trade name myTomorrows
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	By:
    	/s/
    Vuong Trieu	 	By:	/s/
    Pieter Erik de Ridders
	Print Name: 	Vuong
    Trieu	 	Print Name:	Pieter
    Erik de Ridders
	Title:
    	General
    Counsel	 	Title:	General
    Counsel
	Date:
    	24
    July 2020	 	Date:	23
    July 2020


 





 



Addendum #1 For Related Services to the Agreement between Mateon
& Impatients (MyTomorrows)


 




    	 	 	Page 1 | 1
Case 16-82113 Doc 4 Filed 09/08/16 Entered 09/08/16 09:23:59 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
State of New York

Court of Appeals This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to 

revision before publication in the New York Reports.

No. 54 

Brooklyn Center for Psychotherapy, 

Inc.,

 Appellant,

 v.

Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance 

Company,

 Respondent.

Michael Y. Hawrylchak, for appellant.

Dan D. Kohane, for respondent.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Certification of a question by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 

pursuant to section 500.27 of this Court’s Rules of Practice, accepted and the issues 

presented are to be considered after briefing and argument. Chief Judge DiFiore and 

Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia, Wilson and Feinman concur.

Decided May 7, 2020
# EUR-Lex - 11957A079 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957A079

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY ( E.A.E.C. - EURATOM ), TITLE TWO - PROVISIONS FOR THE ENCOURAGEMENT OF PROGRESS IN THE FIELD OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, CHAPTER VII: SAFEGUARDS, ARTICLE 79 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 79

THE COMMISSION SHALL REQUIRE THAT OPERATING RECORDS BE KEPT AND PRODUCED IN ORDER TO PERMIT ACCOUNTING FOR ORES , SOURCE MATERIALS AND SPECIAL FISSILE MATERIALS USED OR PRODUCED . THE SAME REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY IN THE CASE OF THE TRANSPORT OF SOURCE MATERIALS AND SPECIAL FISSILE MATERIALS .

THOSE SUBJECT TO SUCH REQUIREMENTS SHALL NOTIFY THE AUTHORITIES OF THE MEMBER STATE CONCERNED OF ANY COMMUNICATIONS THEY MAKE TO THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 78 AND TO THE FIRST PARAGRAPH OF THIS ARTICLE .

THE NATURE AND THE EXTENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS REFERRED TO IN THE FIRST PARAGRAPH OF THIS ARTICLE SHALL BE DEFINED IN A REGULATION MADE BY THE COMMISSION AND APPROVED BY THE COUNCIL .
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 181 (Tuesday, September 19, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 54801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7822]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date:  11 a.m., Friday, October 6, 2006.

Place:  1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status:  Closed.

Matters To Be Considered:  Surveillance matters.

For Further Information Contact:  Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Eileen A. Donovan,
Acting Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 06-7822 Filed 9-15-06; 3:33 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1752/2005

of 26 October 2005         

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of 21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 27 October 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 October 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 386/2005 (OJ L 62, 9.3.2005, p. 3).

----

ANNEX

to Commission Regulation of 26 October 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

----

(1)  Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 750/2005 (OJ L 126, 19.5.2005, p. 12). Code ‘            999            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

----
No. 10-10984.

#### Best *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.