alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government "Here is how you know"


Official websites use.gov  .gov
 Secure .gov websites use HTTPS 
	A lock https:


Menu
        ABOUTDirector's Corner
Contact COPS
Community Policing in Action: Photo Contest
The L. Anthony Sutin Award for Innovative Law Enforcement and Community Partnerships
Photo Galleries
Subscribe
NEWSPress Releases
Executive Order on Advancing Effective, Accountable Policing and Criminal Justice Practices to Enhance Public Trust and Public Safety
GRANTSSolicitation Finder
Funding Opportunities
How To Apply
Grants Deadlines and Announcement Dates
Compliance and Reporting
Program Documents
Grantee Success Stories
Award Announcement Map
RESOURCESCritical Incident Review: Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, TX
National Blue Alert Network
Resource Center/Publications
E-Newsletter: Community Policing Dispatch
Podcast Series: The Beat
Video Series: What’s New in Blue
Tribal Community Policing Resources
Community Policing Topics
Community Violence Intervention
Addressing Human TraffickingLabor Trafficking
Recruitment, Hiring & Retention
Filing a Civil Rights Complaint
TRAINING & TECHNICAL ASSISTANCECollaborative Reform InitiativeCRI-TAC
Critical Response
Organizational Assessments
COPS Training Portal
Training
ACCOUNT ACCESS
 SEARCH HERE: Search form
    Search
 
  2024 Community Policing In Action Photo Contest Winners                    
		                                January 30, 2024
 SPOTLIGHT
 SUBSCRIBE TO EMAIL UPDATES
 
 SUBSCRIBE TO CP DISPATCH
 ABOUT Contact COPS
	Community Policing in Action: Photo Contest
	The L. Anthony Sutin Award for Innovative Law Enforcement and Community Partnerships
	Photo Galleries
	Subscribe NEWS Press Releases
	Executive Order on Safe Policing for Safer Communities
 GRANTS Compliance & Reporting
	Program Documents
	Grantees
	Grantee Success Stories
	Agency Portal Video Tutorials
	Award Announcement Map RESOURCES National Blue Alert Network
	Recent Releases
	Resource Center/Publications
	E-Newsletter: Community Policing Dispatch
	Podcast Series: The Beat
	Video Series: What’s New in Blue
	Tribal Community Policing Resources
	Addressing Human Trafficking
	Community Policing Topics
	Recruitment, Hiring & Retention
 TRAINING & TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Collaborative Reform Initiative for Technical Assistance Center
	COPS Training Portal
	Training ACCOUNT ACCESS ACCESSIBILITY INFORMATION
 FOIA Language Access Plan Legal Policies and Disclaimers No Fear Act Open Government Plain Writing Privacy Policy USA.gov Whistleblower Protection Social Media Department of Justice Accessibility
Exhibit 10.48


AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO

PETER D. MCDONALD

SECULAR TRUST AGREEMENT


THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 is made as of this 12th day of March,
2007 to the Peter D. McDonald Trust Agreement, dated September 29,
2006 (the “Trust”), by and among UAL Corporation (the “Company”), Peter D.
McDonald (the “Executive”) and The Northern Trust Company, as trustee
(the “Trustee”).


WHEREAS, Section 9(a) of the Trust authorizes its
amendment by a written instrument executed by the Company, the Executive and
the Trustee; and


WHEREAS, the parties hereto wish to amend the Trust in
the manner described herein.


NOW THEREFORE, the Company, the Executive and the
Trustee agree as follows:


1.   Amendment and Restatement of Section 1(d).   Section
1(d) of the Trust shall be amended
and restated in its entirety to read as follows.


“The Trust is intended to be taxed as a simple trust,
and the Trust’s income shall be distributed currently to the Executive at the
times provided herein. The Trust’s fiscal year is the calendar year.”


2.   Amendment and Restatement of Section 2(i).   Section
2(i) of the Trust shall be amended
and restated in its entirety to read as follows:


“All current earnings arising from investment of the
Trust Fund shall be distributed to the Executive as of the last business day of
the calendar quarter in which earned by the Trust. The Trustee, or such other
tax advisor as may be selected by the Company, shall prepare the annual tax
returns for the Trust and deliver such returns to the Trustee and the Company
for review and submission to the proper tax authorities.”


3.   Amendment of Section 4(a)(16).   Section
4(a)(16) of the Trust shall be amended by replacing the word “Code” therein
with the following text “Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended”.


 











 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this
Amendment No. 1 as of the date
first above written.


	
  Attest:

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  UAL CORPORATION

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/ Deborah Porter

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Paul R. Lovejoy

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Name:

  	
  Deborah Porter

  	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
  Paul R. Lovejoy

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Title:

  	
   

  Assistant Secretary

  	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  Senior Vice President,

  General Counsel and Secretary

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Attest: 

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  THE NORTHERN TRUST
  COMPANY,

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  as Trustee

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/ Clark Delanois

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ David M. Cyganiak

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Name:

  	
  Clark Delanois

  	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
  David M. Cyganiak

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Title:

  	
  Sr. Vice President

  	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  Vice President

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  PETER D. MCDONALD

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Peter D. McDonald
EXHIBIT
      32




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63


OF
      TITLE
      18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE





as
      adopted pursuant to





SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      Ronald
      D. Sloan, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of Can-Cal
      Resources Ltd., certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
      quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed by the Company with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission, to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      as amended; and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-QSB financial
      statements fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of Can-Cal Resources Ltd.





/s/
                Ronald D. SloanRonald
                D. Sloan,President,
                Chief Executive Officerand
                Chief Financial OfficerDate:
                May 14, 2007





This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Can-Cal Resources Ltd. and will be retained by Can-Cal Resources Ltd. and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4951

To amend the Clean Air Act to provide that no Federal Implementation

Plan need be promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency upon

the failure of a State implementation plan to attain certain attainment

deadlines which have been superseded by the 1990 amendments to the

Clean Air Act, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 12, 1994

Mr. KIM introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Clean Air Act to provide that no Federal

Implementation Plan need be promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency upon the failure of a State

implementation plan to attain certain attainment deadlines which have been superseded by the 1990 amendments to the Clean Air Act, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FEDERAL IMPLEMENTATION PLANS FOR PRE4 1990 REQUIREMENTS.

5 Section 110(n) of the Clean Air Act is amended by

6 adding the following new paragraph at the end thereof:
2

•HR 4951 IH

1 ‘‘(4) FIP OBLIGATIONS BASED ON CERTAIN

2 PRE-1990 ACT REQUIREMENTS.—Nothing in this sec3 tion or in any other provision of this Act shall be

4 construed to authorize or require the Administrator

5 to promulgate an applicable implementation plan (or

6 portion thereof) under subsection (c) pursuant to a

7 finding by the Administrator that a State plan has

8 failed to demonstrate attainment or maintenance of

9 the national primary ambient air quality standard

10 for ozone or carbon monoxide by December 31,

11 1987, and no such finding shall result in the appli12 cation of any sanctions under section 179 or any

13 other sanctions under any other provision of this

14 Act.’’

Æ
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-51047

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

OSCAR RENE PEREZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-01-CR-951-ALL-DB 

--------------------

April 11, 2002

Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Oscar Rene Perez appeals the sentence imposed following his

guilty plea conviction of attempting to illegally reenter the

United States after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

He contends that the sentence is invalid because it exceeds the

two-year maximum term of imprisonment prescribed in 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(a). Perez complains that his sentence was improperly

enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) based on his prior

deportation following an aggravated felony conviction. He argues

that the sentencing provision violates the Due Process Clause. 
No. 01-51047 

-2-

Alternatively, Perez contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) define separate offenses. He argues that

the aggravated felony conviction that resulted in his increased

sentence was an element of the offense under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b)(2) that should have been alleged in his indictment. 

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Perez acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his arguments for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1202 (2001). This court

must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court

itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984

(internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of

the district court is AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an

appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
§ 217.209 Modifications of Letters of Authorization. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, no substantive modification (including withdrawal or suspension) to the Letter of Authorization by NMFS, issued pursuant to § 216.106 of this chapter and § 217.207 and subject to the provisions of this subpart, shall be made until after notification and an opportunity for public comment has been provided. For purposes of this paragraph, a renewal of a Letter of Authorization under § 217.208, without modification (except for the period of validity), is not considered a substantive modification.
( b ) If the Assistant Administrator determines that an emergency exists that poses a significant risk to the well-being of the species or stocks of marine mammals specified in § 217.202(b), a Letter of Authorization issued pursuant to § 216.106 of this chapter and § 217.207 may be substantively modified without prior notification and an opportunity for public comment. Notification will be published in the Federal Register within 30 days subsequent to the action.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-71018, 33-74728, 33-95178, 333-09913, 333-27951,
333-62125, 333-81401, 333-94837, 333-47140 and 333-56316) and the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-95097 and 333-47150) of Mercury Interactive
Corporation of our report dated January 15, 2001, relating to the financial
statements which appears in this Form 10-K.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Jose, California
March 29, 2001
#### Isaac Moses *vs.*Armand H. Cote, *Secretary of State*

NOVEMBER 3, 1944.

Present: Flynn, C. J., Moss, Capotosto, Baker & Condon, JJ.

Per Curiam.

In the above-entitled matter, after a hearing, and upon consideration of the arguments, law and undisputed facts, it appears that the essence of the petitioner’s complaint, so far as determinable on this petition, is not that he is deprived of the substantial right to have a place upon the ballot labels in the voting machines, or that the electors will have no adequate opportunity to vote for him or his ticket; but it is merely that the places assigned to them on the ballot are not as favorably located and as fully identified and marked as are two other party tickets for the same offices.

While some of petitioner’s complaint in this respect might have had persuasive force if he had filed his petition seasonably, his long delay and the serious effect thereof on necessary preparations of the election machinery make the request for relief at this late date unreasonable. On September 28, 1944, petitioner had the sample ballot which had been prepared by respondent as providéd by law. Later, upon his complaint and after a hearing on October 10, 1944, the board of elections denied the requested relief. Petitioner thereafter not only stood by while the voting machines were being prepared according to the sample ballot, but as late as October 30, 1944 he personally appeared, representing his party, to witness the final inspection, locking and sealing of the voting machines, as provided by law, *403preparatory to their distribution for use at the election to be held November *7,*1944. Not until after the voting machines were thus finally inspected and sealed did the petitioner file the instant petition for mandamus. Moreover, from what was said at the hearing, there is a grave question whether the granting of relief at this late date would not seriously interfere with the orderly conduct of the election and the performance by the respondent of other legal obligations in connection therewith.

*Saul Friedman,*for petitioner.

*John J. Cooney,*Assistant Attorney General *G. Archie Smith,*for respondent.

The petition is denied and dismissed.
October 21 , 2014

Mr. Paul Gretch

Director

, Office of International Aviation

United States Department of Transportation

12 00 New Jersey Ave. , S. E

. Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: American Airlines’ Application for an Exemption

( Dallas/Ft. Worth, Texas

– Queretaro, Mexico )

( Docket DOT

- OST

- 2014

- 0180 )

Dear Mr. Gretch:

We have polled the air carriers on the attached service list regarding

American Airlines’ Application for an Exemption (DFW

- QRO ) . We re ceived no

objections.

Accordingly, we respectfully request expedited allocation of the Exemption

requested in the Application.

Sincerely,

Howard Kass

Vice President

– Regulatory Affairs

Robert A. Wirick,

Managing Director, Regulatory and

Internati onal Affairs

Abigail Donovan

Director, Congressional and Federal Affairs

11 01 17 th Street NW, Washington, DC 20036 ( 202 ) 326

- 5 15 3 Fax: ( 202 ) 898

- 4810CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that, on October 21 , 2014 , I caused to be served a copy of the

foregoing Letter by email upon those addressees listed below:

englets@state. gov (Department of State)

cristinasa@state.gov (Department of State)

paul.gretch@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

brian.hedberg@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

todd.homan@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

peter.irvine@dot.gov (Departm ent of Transportation)

laura.remo@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

brett.kruger@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

john.allen@faa.gov (Federal Aviation Administration)

dan.weiss@united.com (United)

steve.morrissey@united.com (United)

gmurphy @crowell.com (Counsel for United)

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com (Delta)

chris.walker@delta.com (Delta)

jhill@cooley.com (Counsel for JetBlue and Hawaiian)

perkmann@cooley.com (Counsel for JetBlue and Hawaiian)

robert.land@jetblue.com (JetBlue)

msinic k@ssd.com (Counsel for Alaska)

jyoung@yklaw.com (Counsel for Spirit)

dkirstein@yklaw.com (Counsel for Spirit)

bob.kneisley@wnco.com (Southwest)

leslie.abbott@wnco.com (Southwest)

matwood@cozen.com (Counsel for Frontier)

stephen.lachter@lachterlaw.com (Counsel for Frontier)

ethan.blank@rjet.com (Republic)

robert.cohn@hoganlovells.com (Counsel for Republic)

patrick.rizzi@hoganlovells.com (Counsel for Republic)

john.fredericksen@suncountry.com (Sun Country)

thomas.ting@suncountry.com (Sun Country)

r pommer@atlasair.com (Atlas)

anita.mosner@hklaw.com (Counsel for UPS)

jennifer.nowak@ hklaw.com (Counsel for UPS)

cefelts@fedex.com (FedEx)

nssparks@fedex.com (FedEx)

kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com (Polar)

______________ ________

Abigail Donovan
#### §§ 95.2751-95.2755 [Reserved]
#### § 90.635 Limitations on power and antenna height.

(a) The effective radiated power and antenna height for base stations may not exceed 1 kilowatt (30 dBw) and 304 m. (1,000 ft.) above average terrain (AAT), respectively, or the equivalent thereof as determined from the Table. These are maximum values, and applicants will be required to justify power levels and antenna heights requested.

(b) The maximum output power of the transmitter for mobile stations is 100 watts (20 dBw).

Table—Equivalent Power and Antenna Heights for Base Stations in the 851-869 MHz and 935-940 MHz Bands Which Have a Requirement for a 32 km (20 mi) Service Area Radius

| Antenna height (ATT) meters (feet) | Effective radiated power (watts)1 2 4 |
| --- | --- |
| Above 1,372 (4,500) | 65 |
| Above 1,220 (4,000) to 1,372 (4,500) | 70 |
| Above 1,067 (3,500) to 1,220 (4,000) | 75 |
| Above 915 (3,000) to 1,067 (3,500) | 100 |
| Above 763 (2,500) to 915 (3,000) | 140 |
| Above 610 (2,000) to 763 (2,500) | 200 |
| Above 458 (1,500) to 610 (2,000) | 350 |
| Above 305 (1,000) to 458 (1,500) | 600 |
| Up to 305 (1,000) | 3 1,000 |
| | |
| --- | --- |
| 1 Power is given in terms of effective radiated power (ERP). | |
| 2 Applicants in the Los Angeles, CA, area who demonstrate a need to serve both the downtown and fringe areas will be permitted to utilize an ERP of 1 kw at the following mountaintop sites: Santiago Park, Sierra Peak, Mount Lukens, and Mount Wilson. | |
| 3 Stations with antennas below 305 m (1,000 ft) (AAT) will be restricted to a maximum power of 1 kw (ERP). | |
| 4 Licensees in San Diego, CA, will be permitted to utilize an ERP of 500 watts at the following mountaintop sites: Palomar, Otay, Woodson and Miguel. | |

[[70 FR 61062](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/70-FR-61062), Oct. 20, 2005]
###### Editorial Note on Part 97

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 97 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 97.511 Examinee conduct.

Each examinee must comply with the instructions given by the administering VEs.

[59 FR 54835, Nov. 2, 1994]
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of WebMediaBrands Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alan M. Meckler, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Alan M. MecklerAlan M. MecklerChairman and Chief Executive OfficerMay 13, 2011
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Apollo Medical Holdings, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, A. Noel
DeWinter, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:





(1)
            The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and





(2)
            The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the
Company.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section  1350 and is not being filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.




Dated:    December
      11, 2009
              By:A.Noel
      DeWinter
                Chief
      Financial Officer