alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 18.129 Information collection requirements. ( a ) We may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. OMB has approved the collection of information contained in this subpart and assigned OMB control number 1018-0070. You must respond to this information collection request to obtain a benefit pursuant to section 101(a)(5) of the Marine Mammal Protection Act. We will use the information to: ( 1 ) Evaluate the request and determine whether or not to issue specific Letters of Authorization; and
( 2 ) Monitor impacts of activities and effectiveness of mitigation measures conducted under the Letters of Authorization.
( b ) Comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this requirement must be submitted to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, at the address listed in 50 CFR 2.1.
§ 217.193 Prohibitions. Except for takings described in § 217.192 and authorized by a LOA issued under §§ 216.106 of this chapter and 217.196, it shall be unlawful for any person to do any of the following in connection with the activities described in § 217.190: ( a ) Violate, or fail to comply with, the terms, conditions, and requirements of this subpart or a LOA issued under §§ 216.106 of this chapter and 217.196;
( b ) Take any marine mammal not specified in such LOAs;
( c ) Take any marine mammal specified in such LOAs in any manner other than as authorized;
( d ) Take a marine mammal specified in such LOAs after NMFS determines such taking results in more than a negligible impact on the species or stocks of such marine mammal; or
( e ) Take a marine mammal specified in such LOAs after NMFS determines such taking results in an unmitigable adverse impact on the species or stock of such marine mammal for taking for subsistence uses.
Editorial Note on Part 97
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 97 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 97.9 Operator license grant. ( a ) The classes of amateur operator license grants are: Novice, Technician, General, Advanced, and Amateur Extra. The person named in the operator license grant is authorized to be the control operator of an amateur station with the privileges authorized to the operator class specified on the license grant.
( b ) The person named in an operator license grant of Novice, Technician, General or Advanced Class, who has properly submitted to the administering VEs a FCC Form 605 document requesting examination for an operator license grant of a higher class, and who holds a CSCE indicating that the person has completed the necessary examinations within the previous 365 days, is authorized to exercise the rights and privileges of the higher operator class until final disposition of the application or until 365 days following the passing of the examination, whichever comes first.
[75 FR 78169, Dec. 15, 2010]
Form of Amendment to Change of Control Agreement



 Exhibit 10.17 
 March 14, 2007 
 Mr. [    ] 
 c/o FLIR Systems, Inc. 
 27700A SW Parkway Avenue 
 Portland, Oregon 97070 
  

	 	Re:	Amendment to Change of Control Agreement Dated May 8, 2006 

 Dear Mr.
[    ]: 
 FLIR Systems, Inc., an Oregon corporation (the “Company”) and Executive agree to the following
amendment (underlined and in bold) to that Change of Control Agreement (“Agreement”) dated May 8, 2006: 
  

	 	“4.	Change of Control Benefits. 

 (a) In
the event you become eligible for benefits under Section 3, all of your unvested stock options and equity awards will immediately vest and become exercisable and you will fully vest in the Company’s Supplemental Retirement Plan or
any similar pension plan then in existence. In addition, you will receive the following benefits, conditioned upon your signing a release of claims in a form satisfactory to Company: 
 (ii) until the earlier of 18 months and such time as you obtain comparable benefits through employment or otherwise, the Company
will pay the COBRA premiums for continuation of group health and dental insurance coverage for you (and anyone entitled to claim under or through you).” 
 All other provisions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect. 
  

									
	EXECUTIVE	 		 	COMPANY
			
	  	 		 	  
					
		 		 		 	By:	 	  
		 		 		 	Title:
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

671 CA 12-00131 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

SALVATORE J. LICARI, ALSO KNOWN AS SAM LICARI, ANNA LICARI AND LICARI FAMILY HOLDINGS LLC, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

V ORDER

NEW YORK CENTRAL MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

LAW OFFICE OF KEITH D. MILLER, LIVERPOOL (KEITH D. MILLER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

GUSTAVE J. DETRAGLIA, JR., UTICA (MICHELE E. DETRAGLIA OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Samuel D. Hester, J.), entered April 6, 2011 in a breach of contract action. The judgment, among other things, denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

Entered: June 8, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Opinion issued October 24, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-13-00150-CV

———————————

IN RE CHARLES S. IUPE, JR., Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Charles S. Iupe, Jr., a proposed ward in a guardianship proceeding, 

filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting that this Court order the probate 

court to vacate an order appointing a guardian ad litem and an order appointing a 

physician to perform an independent medical examination.*

 * The underlying case is In the Guardianship of Charles S. Iupe, Jr., Cause No. 

417,216, in the Probate Court No. 3 of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Rory 

R. Olsen, presiding.
2

We dismiss the portion of the petition challenging the real party in interest’s 

failure to personally serve Iupe with the first amended application as moot, deny 

the remainder of the petition, and lift the stay previously imposed by this Court.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Sharp, and Brown.
*Secretary Dan Glickman*
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 899/2005

of 15 June 2005         

fixing the import duties in the cereals sector applicable from 16 June 2005         

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1249/96 of 28 June 1996 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 as regards import duties in the cereals sector (2), and in particular Article 2(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The import duties in the cereals sector referred to in Article 10(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 shall be those fixed in Annex I to this Regulation on the basis of the information given in Annex II.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 16 June 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 June 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

(2)OJ L 161, 29.6.1996, p. 125. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1110/2003 (OJ L 158, 27.6.2003, p. 12).

----

ANNEX I

Import duties for the products covered by Article 10(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 applicable from 16 June 2005

----

(1)  For goods arriving in the Community via the Atlantic Ocean or via the Suez Canal (Article 2(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96), the importer may benefit from a reduction in the duty of:

(2)  The importer may benefit from a flat-rate reduction of EUR 24/t, where the conditions laid down in Article 2(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96 are met.

----

ANNEX II

Factors for calculating duties

period from 1.6.2005-14.6.2005         

1.   
Averages over the reference period referred to in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96:

2.   
Averages over the reference period referred to in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96:
Freight/cost: Gulf of Mexico–Rotterdam: 26,53 EUR/t; Great Lakes–Rotterdam: 38,53 EUR/t.

3.   

----

(*1)  A discount of 10 EUR/t (Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96).

(*2)  A discount of 30 EUR/t (Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96).

(*3)  Premium of 14 EUR/t incorporated (Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96).

----
Case 16-24646 Doc 11 Filed 08/03/16 Entered 08/05/16 10:14:36 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
Strafford,

No. 4632.

#### Anna K. Dolph, *Adm’x v.*Marie E. Hager.

Argued September 3, 1958.

Decided October 7, 1958.

*Burns, Calderwood, Bryant & Hinchey (Mr. Hinchey*orally), for the plaintiff.

*Fisher, Parsons & Moran (Mr. Moran*orally), for the defendant.

Blandin, J.

The issue before the Trial Court was whether a binding agreement for settlement had been made between the parties. The record discloses that the defendant’s attorney testified that an agreement had been reached, which opposing counsel and his client unequivocally denied. The defendant’s attorney stresses the fact that he wrote plaintiff’s counsel a letter “in confirmation” *404of the alleged agreement, setting forth its terms, to which he received no written reply. While this evidence was entitled to consideration, it was by no means conclusive in the face of the record as a whole, especially in view of plaintiff’s counsel’s statement that “within two or three days” of the receipt of this letter he telephoned defendant’s attorney and told him no agreement had been made. The sharp conflict in testimony was plainly for the Court to resolve. *Clover &c. Co.*v. *Smith Co.,*96 N. H. 491, 493. Since the evidence supported the result reached the order is

*Exception overruled.*

Wheeler, J., did not sit; the others concurred.
The 11 photographs and one car plan view (picture 12) in this document were 

provided by Long Island Rail Road. No restrictions on use.

Picture 1 - Long Island Rail Road C3 Multi-level Car Vestibule (incorrect titled Galley Car during the 

conference call).

Picture 2 - Long Island Rail Road C3 Multi-level Car Vestibule (incorrect titled Galley Car during the 

conference call)
Picture 3 - Long Island Rail Road C3 Multi-level Car Vestibule (incorrect titled Galley Car during the 

conference call)

Picture 4 – Long Island Rail Road M3 Commuter car
Picture 5 - Long Island Rail Road M3 Commuter Car

Picture 6 - Long Island Rail Road M3 Commuter Car
[Picture 7]

[Picture 8]
[Picture 9]

[Picture 10]
[Picture 11]

[Picture 12]
No. 10-9941.

#### Williams *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Case 16-26598 Doc 1 Filed 08/18/16 Entered 08/18/16 14:35:22 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 10
Case 16-26598 Doc 1 Filed 08/18/16 Entered 08/18/16 14:35:22 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 10
Case 16-26598 Doc 1 Filed 08/18/16 Entered 08/18/16 14:35:22 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 10
Case 16-26598 Doc 1 Filed 08/18/16 Entered 08/18/16 14:35:22 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 10
Case 16-26598 Doc 1 Filed 08/18/16 Entered 08/18/16 14:35:22 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 10
Case 16-26598 Doc 1 Filed 08/18/16 Entered 08/18/16 14:35:22 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 10
Case 16-26598 Doc 1 Filed 08/18/16 Entered 08/18/16 14:35:22 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 10
Case 16-26598 Doc 1 Filed 08/18/16 Entered 08/18/16 14:35:22 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 10
Case 16-26598 Doc 1 Filed 08/18/16 Entered 08/18/16 14:35:22 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 10
Case 16-26598 Doc 1 Filed 08/18/16 Entered 08/18/16 14:35:22 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 10
Jump to content

consumer.govwhat to know and do

MenuMenuChange menu visibility

## CG: Main Navigation

                          -  Managing Your Money 
                          -  Credit, Loans and Debt 
                          -  Scams and Identity Theft 
                          -  Toolbox 

Español

# Learn More

                              - Consumer.ftc.gov
                              - Consumer Action

## CG: Footer

                      -  Privacy Policy 
                      -  USA.gov 
                      -  Federal Trade Commission
§ 90.365 Partitioned licenses and disaggregated spectrum. ( a ) *Eligibility.* ( 1 ) Party seeking approval for partitioning and disaggregation shall request an authorization pursuant to § 1.948 of this chapter.
( 2 ) Multilateration LMS licensees may apply to partition their licensed geographic service area or disaggregate their licensed spectrum at any time following the grant of their licenses. Multilateration LMS licensees may partition or disaggregate to any party that is also eligible to be a multilateration LMS licensee. Partitioning is permitted along any service area defined by the parties, and spectrum may be disaggregated in any amount. The Commission will also consider requests for partial assignment of licenses that propose combinations of partitioning and disaggregation.
( b ) *Partitioning.* In the case of partitioning, applicants and licensees must file FCC Form 603 pursuant to § 1.948 and list the partitioned service area on a schedule to the application. The geographic coordinates must be specified in degrees, minutes, and seconds to the nearest second of latitude and longitude and must be based upon the 1983 North American Datum (NAD83).
( c ) *License term.* The license term for a partitioned license area, and for disaggregated spectrum shall be the remainder of the original licensee's license term.
[63 FR 40663, July 30, 1998, as amended at 63 FR 68966, Dec. 14, 1998; 82 FR 41548, Sept. 1, 2017]
PUBLIC LAW 108–103—OCT. 29, 2003 117 STAT. 1199

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1591:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 149 (2003):

Sept. 25, considered and passed Senate.

Oct. 20, considered and passed House.

Æ

Public Law 108–103

108th Congress

An Act

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 48 South

Broadway, Nyack, New York, as the ‘‘Edward O’Grady, Waverly Brown, Peter

Paige Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF BUILDING.

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal

Service located at 48 South Broadway, Nyack, New York, and

known as the ‘‘Nyack Post Office’’ shall be known as the ‘‘Edward

O’Grady, Waverly Brown, Peter Paige Post Office Building’’.

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation,

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

referred to shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Edward

O’Grady, Waverly Brown, Peter Paige Post Office Building’’.

Approved October 29, 2003.

Oct. 29, 2003

[S. 1591]
§ 90.317 Fixed ancillary signaling and data transmissions. ( a ) Licensees of systems that have exclusive-use status in their respective geographic areas may engage in fixed ancillary signaling and data transmissions, subject to the following requirements: ( 1 ) All such ancillary operations must be on a secondary, non-interference basis to the primary mobile operation of any other licensee.
( 2 ) The output power at the remote site shall not exceed 30 watts.
( 3 ) Any fixed transmitters will not count toward meeting the mobile loading requirements nor be considered in whole or in part as a justification for authorizing additional frequencies in the licensee's mobile system.
( 4 ) Automatic means must be provided to deactivate the remote transmitter in the event the carrier remains on for a period in excess of three minutes.
( 5 ) Operational fixed stations authorized pursuant to the provisions of this paragraph are exempt from the requirements of §§ 90.425 and 90.429.
( 6 ) If the system is licensed on 470-512 MHz conventional frequencies, and exclusivity has been achieved through the aggregate loading of more than a single co-channel licensee, then a licensee must obtain the concurrence of other co-channel licensees prior to commencing such ancillary operations.
( b ) Licensees of systems that do not have exclusive-use status in their respective geographic areas may conduct fixed ancillary signaling and data transmissions only in accordance with the provisions of § 90.235 of this part.
[57 FR 34693, Aug. 6, 1992]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       2,107,285
<SECURITIES>                               271,994,738
<RECEIVABLES>                              242,895,313
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                102,222,184
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      18,707,257
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,760,220
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             810,202,359
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                    280,250,719
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       296,491
<OTHER-SE>                                 138,535,702
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               810,202,359
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           199,215,543
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            93,883,472
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          20,223,755
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             85,108,316
<INCOME-TAX>                                34,427,434
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         50,680,882
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                50,680,882
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.59
<FN>
<F1>The Company makes use of an unclassified balance sheet style due to the nature
of its business. Current Assets and Current Liabilities are therefore reflected
as zero in accordance with the instructions of Appendix E to the EDGAR Filer
Manual.
</FN>


</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government "Here is how you know"


Official websites use.gov  .gov
 Secure .gov websites use HTTPS 
	A lock https:


Menu
        ABOUTDirector's Corner
Contact COPS
Community Policing in Action: Photo Contest
The L. Anthony Sutin Award for Innovative Law Enforcement and Community Partnerships
Photo Galleries
Subscribe
NEWSPress Releases
Executive Order on Advancing Effective, Accountable Policing and Criminal Justice Practices to Enhance Public Trust and Public Safety
GRANTSSolicitation Finder
Funding Opportunities
How To Apply
Grants Deadlines and Announcement Dates
Compliance and Reporting
Program Documents
Grantee Success Stories
Award Announcement Map
RESOURCESCritical Incident Review: Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, TX
National Blue Alert Network
Resource Center/Publications
E-Newsletter: Community Policing Dispatch
Podcast Series: The Beat
Video Series: What’s New in Blue
Tribal Community Policing Resources
Community Policing Topics
Community Violence Intervention
Addressing Human TraffickingLabor Trafficking
Recruitment, Hiring & Retention
Filing a Civil Rights Complaint
TRAINING & TECHNICAL ASSISTANCECollaborative Reform InitiativeCRI-TAC
Critical Response
Organizational Assessments
COPS Training Portal
Training
ACCOUNT ACCESS
 Search form
    Search






School Violence Prevention Program (SVPP) Awards                                                  AWARD ANNOUNCEMENT DOCUMENTS

Award List

Award Owner's Manual

SVPP Post-Award Fact Sheet

SVPP Methodology

AWARD MANAGEMENT DOCUMENTS

SF-425 Fact Sheet
	SF-425 Helpful Hints
	Tips for Financial Managers to complete FFRs

Consultant Contractor Fact Sheet
	Sole Source Justification Fact Sheet

**For additional assistance, we encourage you to visit the Award Management Materials Page, where you will find frequently asked questions, additional fact sheets, links to webinars, and other resources.**


SPOTLIGHT


SUBSCRIBE TO EMAIL UPDATES
 
 SUBSCRIBE TO CP DISPATCH


ABOUT Contact COPS
	Community Policing in Action: Photo Contest
	The L. Anthony Sutin Award for Innovative Law Enforcement and Community Partnerships
	Photo Galleries
	Subscribe NEWS Press Releases
	Executive Order on Safe Policing for Safer Communities
 GRANTS Compliance & Reporting
	Program Documents
	Grantees
	Grantee Success Stories
	Agency Portal Video Tutorials
	Award Announcement Map RESOURCES National Blue Alert Network
	Recent Releases
	Resource Center/Publications
	E-Newsletter: Community Policing Dispatch
	Podcast Series: The Beat
	Video Series: What’s New in Blue
	Tribal Community Policing Resources
	Addressing Human Trafficking
	Community Policing Topics
	Recruitment, Hiring & Retention
 TRAINING & TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Collaborative Reform Initiative for Technical Assistance Center
	COPS Training Portal
	Training ACCOUNT ACCESS ACCESSIBILITY INFORMATION


FOIA Language Access Plan Legal Policies and Disclaimers No Fear Act Open Government Plain Writing Privacy Policy USA.gov Whistleblower Protection Social Media Department of Justice Accessibility
§ 78.30 Forfeiture and termination of station authorizations. ( a ) A CARS license will be automatically forfeited in whole or in part without further notice to the licensee upon the voluntary removal or alteration of the facilities, so as to render the station not operational for a period of 30 days or more.
( b ) If a station licensed under this part discontinues operation on a permanent basis, the licensee must cancel the license. For purposes of this section, any station which has not operated for one year or more is considered to have been permanently discontinued.
[69 FR 57862, Sept. 28, 2004]