alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Vincent Ianacci, Plaintiff, *v.*Mr. Pendis, Defendant.

Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County,

October 7, 1970.

*Vincent Ianacci,*plaintiff in person. *Irving J. Kaufman*for defendant.

Feedeeio E. Hammeb, J.

The plaintiff sues to recover security in the sum of $237.50, deposited with the defendant pursuant to a written lease dated June 29, 1970, to enter occupancy September 1,1970.

The subject building is an apartment house occupied by many tenants. The plaintiff contends and this court finds, from the credible testimony, uncontradicted, that the apartment in question was, on the commencement of the term and immediately prior and subsequent thereto, infested with roaches.

Subdivision 1 of section 80 of the Multiple Dwelling Law states: *“*The owner shall keep all and every part of a multiple dwelling * * * clean and free from *vermin,*dirt, filth, garbage or other thing or matter dangerous to life or health.” (Italics supplied.)

Plaintiff contends that this condition relieved him of his obligation to take possession. In fact, he contends that this *condition*constitutes a constructive eviction, relieving him of his obligation to take occupancy.

*“*Where a building is rented to several tenants and a part or parts thereof remain in the landlord’s control, the fact that a tenant may have known of the presence of vermin in the building before entering into the lease does not relieve the landlord of any duty which would otherwise rest upon him to exterminate such vermin. ’ ’ *(Batterman*v. *Levenson,*102 Misc. 92, 95.)

“ The presence of * * * vermin, and other like pests * * * in a building rented to several tenants, where the tenant retains control of * # * parts of the building, may con*179stitute such a nuisance as to justify a tenant in abandoning the demised premises even without direct proof that such pests came from or through a part of the building under the landlord’s control ” (33 N. Y. Jur., Landlord and Tenant, § 177, p. 527). A requirement for a tenant to move in and then immediately remove would constitute an idle gesture and would only increase the plaintiff’s damages. The court could not cause parties such hardships.

The court having found that the condition is as contended by the plaintiff, and that it constitutes a breach of the lease by the defendant, the plaintiff is entitled to a return of his security.

Judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $237.50, with interest from September 1,1970.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, W. Kirk Patterson, certify that:

1. I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Staktek Holdings, Inc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fourth quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the Audit Committee of the Companys Board of Directors:

(a) All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                    |  |            |  |                                                  
|------------------- |  | ---------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 7, 2007 |  | Signature: |  | /s/    W. KIRK
PATTERSON                         
|                    |  |            |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
# Map            Korean Peninsula.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

          - [(MT-922-06)-1310-FI-P; NDM 94458] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

Per 30 U.S.C. 188(d), Baldwin Exploration Corp. timely filed a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease NDM 94458, Mountrail County, North Dakota, together with a request for a rental and royalty reduction allowed under 43 CFR 3108.2-3(f). The lessee paid the required rental at the rate provided in the original lease terms. 

No leases were issued that affect these lands. The lessee paid the $500 administration fee for the reinstatement of the lease and $163 cost for publishing this Notice. 

The lessee met the requirements for reinstatement of the lease per Sec. 31 (d) and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188). We are proposing to reinstate the lease, effective the date of termination subject to the original terms and conditions of the lease. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Karen L. Johnson, Chief, Fluids Adjudication Section, BLM Montana State Office, 5001 Southgate Drive, Billings, Montana 59101-4669, Phone (406) 896-5098/Fax (406) 896-5292.

Dated: September 13, 2006.

Karen L. Johnson,

Chief, Fluids Adjudication Section.

[FR Doc. 06-7833 Filed 9-20-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P
(0it (1it

(ˆ

0it (ˆ0it (ˆ0it (ˆ1it (ˆ1it (ˆ1it Bˆ00 Bˆ10

Table 2ab

Summary Statistics for the Estimates of the and When Conjunction II Holds

Estimation Period: August 1963 to December 1991, 341 months

(t ratios in Parentheses, * denotes statistically significant t ratio at the 0.05 level)

Portfolio Min( ) Max( ) Range( ) Min( ) Max( ) Range( ) Log

likelihood

ns1b1e -15.15 14.03 29.18 0.73 2.38 1.65 -0.10 1.35 -1004.99

(-0.34) (4.28)*

ns1b5e -7.97 19.01 26.98 0.09 2.07 1.98 0.59 0.97 -955.58

(2.36)* (20.43)*

ns2b1e -12.08 11.90 23.98 1.11 1.77 0.66 -0.11 1.41 -889.15

(-0.56) (32.29)*

ns2b5e -8.24 13.11 21.34 0.22 2.06 1.84 0.53 1.14 -890.06

(2.91)* (0.96)

ns3b1e -6.37 10.94 17.30 0.94 1.97 1.03 -0.09 1.39 -832.23

(-0.60) (19.50)*

ns3b5e -6.15 11.73 17.88 0.18 1.97 1.79 0.54 1.09 -847.29

(3.54)* (1.14)

ns4b1e -5.97 8.46 14.44 1.01 1.41 0.40 -0.00 1.21 -736.48

(-0.02) (49.07)*

ns4b5e -6.24 8.85 15.09 0.28 1.77 1.50 0.48 1.21 -830.63

(3.22)* (1.48)

ns5b1e -4.17 4.77 8.93 0.70 1.40 0.71 -0.08 1.04 -670.84

(-0.89) (48.90)*

ns5b5e -7.34 9.77 17.11 0.50 1.32 0.82 0.19 0.88 -845.95

(1.32) (25.52)*
§ 80.411 Vessel certification or exemption. ( a ) *Application.* The application procedures for inspection and certification and for exemptions are contained in § 80.59.
( b ) *Posting.* Part II or III of Title III of the Communications Act, Safety Convention, and Great Lakes certificates or exemptions must be posted in a prominent, accessible place in the ship. Ships subject to subpart T of this part may, in lieu of a posted certificate, certify compliance in the station log required by § 80.409(f).
[51 FR 31213, Sept. 2, 1986, as amended at 61 FR 25807, May 23, 1996; 88 FR 77222, Nov. 9, 2023]
§ 95.1765 GMRS frequency accuracy. Each GMRS transmitter type must be designed to comply with the frequency accuracy requirements in this section under normal operating conditions. Operators of GMRS stations must also ensure compliance with these requirements. ( a ) The carrier frequency of each GMRS transmitter transmitting an emission with an occupied bandwidth greater than 12.5 kHz must remain within 5 parts-per-million (ppm) of the channel center frequencies listed in § 95.1763 under normal operating conditions.
( b ) The carrier frequency of each GMRS transmitter transmitting an emission with an occupied bandwidth of 12.5 kHz or less must remain within 2.5 ppm of the channel center frequencies listed in § 95.1763 under normal operating conditions.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 900/2005

of 15 June 2005         

fixing representative prices in the poultrymeat and egg sectors and for egg albumin, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1484/95

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2771/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common organisation of the market in eggs (1), and in particular Article 5(4) thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2777/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common organisation of the market in poultrymeat (2), and in particular Article 5(4) thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2783/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common system of trade for ovalbumin and lactalbumin (3), and in particular Article 3(4) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1484/95 is hereby replaced by the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 16 June 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 June 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 282, 1.11.1975, p. 49. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 806/2003 (OJ L 122, 16.5.2003, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 282, 1.11.1975, p. 77. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 806/2003.

(3)OJ L 282, 1.11.1975, p. 104. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2916/95 (OJ L 305, 19.12.1995, p. 49).

(4)OJ L 145, 29.6.1995, p. 47. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 756/2005 (OJ L 126, 19.5.2005, p. 36).

----

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 15 June 2005 fixing representative prices in the poultrymeat and egg sectors and for egg albumin, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1484/95

                     ‘ANNEX I

----

(1)  Origin of imports:

----
#### § 14.103 Prohibitions.

Unless the requirements of this subpart are fully satisfied and all other legal requirements are met, it is unlawful for any person to transport to the United States, cause to be transported to the United States, or allow to be transported to the United States any live wild mammal or bird. It shall be unlawful for any person to import, to transport, or to cause or permit to be transported to the United States any wild mammal or bird under inhumane or unhealthful conditions or in violation of this subpart J.
```

[108th Congress Public Law 103]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ103.108]

[[Page 117 STAT. 1199]]

Public Law 108-103
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 48 South Broadway, Nyack, New York, as the ``Edward O'Grady, Waverly 
Brown, Peter Paige Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Oct. 29, 2003 -  [S. 
                                1591]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 48 South Broadway, Nyack, New York, and known as the ``Nyack 
Post Office'' shall be known as the ``Edward O'Grady, Waverly Brown, 
Peter Paige Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Edward O'Grady, Waverly 
Brown, Peter Paige Post Office Building''.

    Approved October 29, 2003.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 1591:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 149 (2003):
            Sept. 25, considered and passed Senate.
            Oct. 20, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Abraxas Petroleum Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A Number 2 for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert L.G. Watson, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as        adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/ Robert L.G. Watson |
|--------|------------------------|

|   | Robert L.G. Watson |
|--------|--------------------|

|   | Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | August 21, 2008 |
|--------|-----------------|

 

 

 

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About Crop I... 
-  National Fac... 
-  Mississippi State Profile - 2023 

## About Crop Insurance

        -  Managing Your Farm Risk            -  Insurance Plans 
          -  Insurance Cycle              -  Application Process 
            -  Coverage and Billing 
            -  Claims Process 
            -  Program Changes 
          -  Obligations and Expectations 
          -  Resources 
        -  Beginning or Veteran Farmers 
        -  Urban Farmers 
        -  Highlighted Initiatives and Plans            -  Beginners Guide to Crop Insurance 
          -  Conservation 
          -  Controlled Environment 
          -  Cover Crops 
          -  Double Cropping 
          -  Emergency and Natural Disaster Relief 
          -  Fire Insurance Protection – Smoke Index 
          -  Hemp 
          -  Hurricane Insurance Protection - Wind Index 
          -  Nursery              -  Nursery Value Select 
          -  Organic Crops              -  Contract Price Addendum Eligibility by Commodity 
            -  Organic Premium Price Elections Available by Commodity 
            -  Steps to Success 
          -  Policyholder Bill of Rights 
          -  Prevented Planting 
          -  Shellfish 
          -  Specialty Crops              -  2023 Expansions of Specialty Crops Programs 
            -  2022 Expansion of Specialty Crops Programs 
            -  2021 Expansions of Specialty Crops Programs 
            -  2020 Expansions of Specialty Crops Programs 
            -  2019 Expansions of Specialty Crops Programs 
          -  Whole-Farm Revenue Protection 
        -  Fact Sheets 
        -  Frequently Asked Questions 
        -  Farm Bill 
        -  Outreach and Education            -  Partnership Projects 
          -  Pilot Projects 
          -  Success Stories and Program Impact 
          -  Past Webinars 

# Mississippi State Profile - 2023

migrationWed, 05/08/2024 - 14:39

View PDF

Download 2023 Mississippi State Profile (PDF)

All multi-peril crop insurance, including Catastrophic Risk Protection policies, are available from private crop insurance agents. A list of insurance agents is available online using the RMA Agent Locator.
§ 64.904 Independent audits. ( a ) Each carrier required to file a cost allocation manual shall elect to either have an attest engagement performed by an independent auditor every two years, covering the prior two year period, or have a financial audit performed by an independent auditor every two years, covering the prior two year period. In either case, the initial engagement shall be performed in the calendar year after the carrier is first required to file a cost allocation manual.
( b ) The attest engagement shall be an examination engagement and shall provide a written communication that expresses an opinion that the systems, processes, and procedures applied by the carrier to generate the results reported pursuant to § 43.21(e)(2) of this chapter comply with the Commission's Joint Cost Orders issued in conjunction with CC Docket No. 86-111, the Commission's Accounting Safeguards proceeding in CC Docket No. 96-150, and the Commission's rules and regulations including §§ 32.23 and 32.27 of this chapter, and §§ 64.901, and 64.903 in force as of the date of the auditor's report. At least 30 days prior to beginning the attestation engagement, the independent auditors shall provide the Commission with the audit program. The attest engagement shall be conducted in accordance with the attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, except as otherwise directed by the Chief, Enforcement Bureau.
( c ) The biennial financial audit shall provide a positive opinion on whether the applicable date shown in the carrier's annual report required by § 43.21(e)(2) of this chapter present fairly, in all material respects, the information of the Commission's Joint Cost Orders issued in conjunction with CC Docket No. 86-111, the Commission's Accounting Safeguards proceeding in CC Docket No. 96-150, and the Commission's rules and regulations including §§ 32.23 and 32.27 of this chapter, and §§ 64.901, and 64.903 in force as of the date of the auditor's report. The audit shall be conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, except as otherwise directed by the Chief, Enforcement Bureau. The report of the independent auditor shall be filed at the time that the carrier files the annual reports required by § 43.21(e)(2) of this chapter.
[67 FR 5702, Feb. 6, 2002, as amended at 67 FR 13229, Mar. 21, 2002]
EXHIBIT
31.2: Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications





I, Ding
Rencai, certify that:





1.  I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of China Water Group,
Inc.;




2.  Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.   Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;




4.  The
Company’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have:




a)     Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to ensure that
material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this  report is being
prepared;




b)  Evaluated
the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




c)   Disclosed
in this report any change in the Company’s internal controls over financial
reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the Company's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.  The
issuer’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the
Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the issuer’s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):




a)  All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and




b)  Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the smaller reporting company’s internal controls
over financial reporting.




Date:
      June 22, 2009
              /s/ Ding RencaiDing
      Rencai, Chief Financial
Officer