alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    In connection with the Annual Report of Reddi Brake Supply Corporation (the ACompany@) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald S. Friend, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   Date: August 8, 2007 By: /s/ Ronald S. Friend Ronald S. Friend Chief Financial Officer
#### § 20.23 Shooting hours.

No person shall take migratory game birds except during the hours open to shooting as prescribed in subpart K of this part and 50 CFR 21.180 and 21.183 of this chapter.

[73 FR 65951, Nov. 5, 2008, as amended at 87 FR 880, Jan. 7, 2022]
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 10.18

ADDENDUM AGREEMENT
------------------


This Addendum Agreement ("Addendum") dated this 12 day of February 2007, is
entered by and between Isramco Inc., as seller ("Seller") and Chesny Estates
Ltd. as buyer ("Buyer"); Seller and Buyer shall be referred to collectively as
the "Parties"


WHEREAS The Parties entered into a Sale and Purchase Agreement dated December
        2006 ( the "PSA") pursuant to which Seller sold and transferred to Buyer
        all of the issued share capital of Magic 1 Cruise Line Corp. (the
        "Shares" and the "Company", respectively) ; and

WHEREAS In accordance with the PSA the Purchase Price (as defined in the PSA) is
        subject to certain adjustments; and

WHEREAS The Company bared during the forth quarter of 2006 certain costs and
        expenses relating to the preparation of the cruise liner for the 2007
        cruise season ( the "2007 Costs"); and

WHEREAS It was agreed between the Parties that Buyer shall bare all such costs
        and expenses in a manner it will be added to the Purchase Price; and


WHEREAS The Parties wish to determine the Final Purchase Price for the Shares



NOW THEREFORE it is agreed between the Parties as follows:


1.      The preamble to this Addendum constitutes an integral part thereof.

2.      Buyer acknowledges and confirms that Buyer reviewed the final draft of
        the financial statements of the Company as of December 31, 2006 and
        examined the cost and expenses resulting from and relating to the
        preparation of the cruise liner for the 2007 cruise season.

3.      It is agreed between the Parties that the Final Purchase Price for the
        Shares, reflecting the adjustments in accordance with section 2.2 to the
        PSA as well as the addition relating to the 2007 Costs, is $2.15
        million, with effect as of December 31, 2006

4.      Seller shall reimburse to Buyer the balance of $150,000 within 30 day
        from the execution of this Addendum.


<PAGE>



        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Addendum Agreement have caused
this Addendum Agreement to be duly executed as of the date set forth above.


SELLER:  ISRAMCO, INC.
By: /s/ Haim Tsuff
Name: Haim Tsuff
Title: Chairman of the Board & CEO




BUYER:   CHESNY  ESTATES  LTD.
By: /s/ Gil Hod
Name: Gil Hod
EXHIBIT 32.2: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of China Water Group, Inc. (the “Registrant”) certifies that:




1.           The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant for the period ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and




2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Date:  December 27, 2011
/s/ Ding RencaiDing Rencai, Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          44,337
<SECURITIES>                                    26,686
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,639
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,136
<INVENTORY>                                        560
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,532
<PP&E>                                          12,483
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,070
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 117,489
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,450
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               32
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                          99
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   117,489
<SALES>                                         54,550
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                54,550
<CGS>                                            6,659
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,659
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                45,469
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,783
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,157
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,626
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,626
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.28
§ 20.2 Relation to other provisions. ( a ) *Migratory bird permits.* The provisions of this part shall not be construed to alter the terms of any permit or other authorization issued pursuant to part 21 of this subchapter.
( b ) *Migratory bird hunting stamps.* The provisions of this part are in addition to the provisions of the Migratory Bird Hunting Stamp Act of 1934 (48 Stat. 451, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 718a).
( c ) *National wildlife refuges.* The provisions of this part are in addition to, and are not in lieu of, any other provision of law respecting migratory game birds under the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (80 Stat. 927, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 668dd) or any regulation made pursuant thereto.
( d ) *State Laws for the protection of migratory birds.* No statute or regulation of any State shall be construed to relieve a person from the restrictions, conditions, and requirements contained in this part, however, nothing in this part shall be construed to prevent the several States from making and enforcing laws or regulations not inconsistent with these regulations and the conventions between the United States and any foreign country for the protection of migratory birds or with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, or which shall give further protection to migratory game birds.
( e ) *Migratory bird subsistence harvest in Alaska.* The provisions of this part, except for paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section, are not applicable to the regulations governing the migratory bird subsistence harvest in Alaska (part 92 of this subchapter) unless specifically referenced in part 92 of subchapter G of this chapter.
[38 FR 22021, Aug. 15, 1973, as amended at 68 FR 43027, July 21, 2003]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# ACTION:

Announcement of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the sixth meeting of the American Health Information Community Biosurveillance Data Steering Group in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.).

# DATES:

September 14, 2006 from 1:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20201), Conference Room 4090 (you will need a photo ID to enter a Federal building).

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

*http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​bio_​main.html*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The meeting will be available via Internet access. Go to                     *http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​bio_​instruct.html*                     for additional information on the meeting.                

Dated: August 25, 2006.

Judith Sparrow,

Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.

[FR Doc. 06-7380 Filed 8-31-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
Nˆ

00 Nˆ11 Fˆ

2

a

*ˆ

00a

Fˆ

2

a

*ˆ

10a

Fˆ

2

a

*ˆ

11a

Table 2c

Estimates of the Parameters of Equation (11) and Forecasting Performance of

Equation (7) When Conjunction II Holds, Estimation Period: August 1963 to

December 1991, 341 months, and Forecasting Period: January 1992 to December

1993, 24 months

Portfolio RMSE MAE

ns1b1e 0.18 0.96 100.29 74.67 126.77 5.07 1.44

ns1b5e 0.26 -0.99 10.84 0.63 0.11 4.89 0.79

ns2b1e 0.13 0.28 9.98 0.11 0.04 3.70 3.02

ns2b5e 0.18 0.99 7.45 0.39 0.07 3.53 0.66

ns3b1e 0.07 0.86 6.92 0.36 0.03 2.88 0.88

ns3b5e 0.11 0.99 6.10 0.31 0.05 2.71 5.59

ns4b1e 0.15 -0.99 4.38 0.02 0.00 2.24 1.19

ns4b5e 0.10 0.99 5.57 0.16 0.04 2.54 1.23

ns5b1e 0.08 -0.99 2.16 0.05 0.01 2.03 2.26

ns5b5e -0.04 -0.99 7.19 0.16 0.01 4.61 3.26
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 180 (Monday, September 18, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 54688]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7715]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Notice of Availability for the Record of Decision on the Final 
Environmental Impact Statement for the Stream Management Plan, Herbert 
Hoover National Historic Site, West Branch, IA

AGENCY: National Park Service, Department of the Interior.

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969, the National Park Service (NPS) announces the 
availability of the Record of Decision (ROD) on the final Environmental 
Impact Statement (EIS) for the Stream Management Plan, Herbert Hoover 
National Historic Site (Site), West Branch, Iowa. The Midwest Regional 
Director approved the ROD for this final EIS on August 1, 2006. 
Specifically, the Site will adopt and implement actions described under 
Alternative E, the preferred alternative, in the final EIS. Under the 
selected action, the primary strategy entails the restoration of the 
function of the stream corridor and a floodwater detention area in the 
upstream portion of the Park.
    The EIS considered and evaluated five alternatives to the selected 
action. A full range of foreseeable environmental consequences was 
assessed. The overriding concern expressed by the Site and the public 
during the development of this action was the protection of fundamental 
resources and values of the Site. Alternative E--Provide 50-Year Flood 
Protection--is the selected alternative since it best meets the 
objectives of the Site. The preferred alternative will not result in 
the impairment of resources and values.
    The ROD includes a statement of the decision made, synopses of 
other alternatives considered, the basis for the decision, the 
rationale for why the selected action is the environmentally preferred 
alternative, a finding of no impairment of Site resources and values, 
and an overview of public involvement in the decisionmaking process.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Superintendent, Stream Management Plan 
Record of Decision, Herbert Hoover National Historic Site, P.O. Box 
607, West Branch, Iowa 52358, or by calling 319-643-2541. Copies of the 
final EIS and ROD are available upon request from the above address.

    Dated: August 1, 2006.
Ernest Quintana,
Regional Director, Midwest Region.
[FR Doc. 06-7715 Filed 9-15-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
No. 11-5748.

#### Knight *v.*Pennsylvania.

Super. Ct. Pa. Cer-tiorari denied.
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





The Board of Directors


Celadon Group, Inc.:





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement 333-14641 on Form S-8 pertaining to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan dated October 23, 1996, Registration Statement 333-42209 on Form S-8 pertaining to the Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan dated December 12, 1997, Registration Statements 333-42207 and 333-31164 on Form S-8 pertaining to the 1994 Stock Option plan dated December 12, 1997 and February 25, 2000, respectively, Registration Statement 333-131227 on Form S-8 pertaining to the 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan dated January 23, 2006, and Registration Statement 333-194017 on Form S-8 pertaining to the 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan as amended dated December 11, 2013 of Celadon Group, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated September 12, 2013, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Celadon Group, Inc. as of June 30, 2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, cash flows, and stockholders' equity for each of the years in the two-year period ended June 30, 2013, and the related financial statement Schedule II for each of the years in the two-year period ended June 30, 2013, which report appears in the June 30, 2014 annual report on Form 10-K/A of Celadon Group, Inc.








/s/ KPMG LLP


Indianapolis, Indiana


March 30, 2015




Back to Form 10-K/A
#### § 95.2331 Permissible WMTS uses.

WMTS transmitters are used to transmit wireless medical telemetry, on a unidirectional or bidirectional basis. All transmissions must be related to the provision of medical care.
#### § 216.90 Purposes.

This subpart governs the requirements for using the official mark described in § 216.95 or an alternative mark that refers to dolphins, porpoises, or marine mammals, to label tuna or tuna products offered for sale in or exported from the United States using the term dolphin-safe or suggesting the tuna were harvested in a manner not injurious to dolphins.

[69 FR 55307, Sept. 13, 2004]
[No. 2060.]

#### J. F. Merritt *v.*The State.

Unlawful Sale of Intoxicating Liquors — Indictment.— To engage in or pursue the occupation of selling intoxicating liquors is taxable under the laws of this State, and to do so without having first paid the tax due thereon is a penal offense. But a mere sale of intoxicating liquors without engaging in or pursuing the occupation of selling is not an offense. Indictment, therefore, which charges merely a sale of intoxicating liquors without license charges no offense against the laws of this State.

Appeal from the County Court of Eusk. Tried below before the Hon. J. H. Turner, County Judge.

The conviction in this case was had under an indictment (transferred from the district court) charging the appellant with selling intoxicating liquors without license. A fine of $300 was the penalty imposed by the jury.

No brief for the appellant.

*J. H.*Burts, Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

*436Willson, Judge.

To engage in or pursue the occupation of selling intoxicating liquors is taxable under the laws of this State (Gen’l Laws 17th Leg., p. 112), and it is an offense against the penal laws of this State to engage in or pursue such occupation without first paying the tax due thereon. (Penal Code, art. 110.) But a sale of such liquors without engaging in or pursuing the occupation of selling is not an *act*taxable by law, and it is not a violation of the penal law to make such a sale without first having obtained a license therefor.

It is the *occupation*and not the *act of selling*which is taxable. There may be one or more sales, and yet no occupation of selling, or there may be the occupation of selling without even a single sale. *(Halfin*v. *The*State, 18 Texas Ct. App., 410; *Wells*v. *The State,*id., 417; *Mansfield*v. *The State,*17 Texas Ct. App., 468; *Standford*v. *The State,*16 Texas Ct. App., 331; *La Norris*v. *The State,*13 Texas Ct. App., 33.) There are certain enumerated *acts*taxed by law, such as exhibiting a theater, dramatic performance, circus, sleight of hand performance, etc., etc. These *acts*are made taxable whether engaged in as an occupation or not, and to commit them without first paying the tax is a penal offense. But, as before stated, a sale of intoxicating liquors is not *per se*an act taxable by law.

As the indictment in this case does not charge the defendant with engaging in or pursuing the occupation of selling intoxicating liquors without first obtaining license, but only charges him with selling such liquors without license, it fails to charge an offense against the law, and therefore the judgment is reversed and the prosecution is dismissed.

*-Reversed and dismissed.*

[Opinion delivered November 25, 1885.]
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P258Drug Endangered Children Guide for Law EnforcementIt is estimated that more than 9 million children live in homes where a parent or other adult uses illegal drugs. This exposure leaves them vulnerable to abuse and neglect. Identifying and responding to these drug endangered children needs to be a central part of law enforcement's mission to serve and protect. The Drug Endangered Children Guide for Law Enforcement offers law enforcement professionals practical information on how to develop an effective collaborative response to this complicated issue and make a positive impact on the lives of drug endangered children. First published 2013, revised 2015, second edition 2020.Categories: Nonviolent Crime • Youth SafetyLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p258Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFBook • Mar 2020Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 02:16 (UTC-5) in 0.20 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7398

WAYNE DOUGLAS BUTTS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DOCTOR JAMALUDEEN,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District

Judge. (CA-04-424)

Submitted: December 21, 2005 Decided: January 18, 2006

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wayne Douglas Butts, Appellant Pro Se. John David McChesney, RAWLS

& MCNELIS, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Wayne Douglas Butts seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Butts v. Jamaludeen, No. CA-04-424 (E.D. Va. Aug. 4, 2005). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 69.707 Geographic scope of petition. ( a ) *MSA.* ( 1 ) A price cap LEC filing a petition for pricing flexibility in an MSA shall include data sufficient to support its petition, as set forth in this subpart, disaggregated by MSA.
( 2 ) A price cap LEC may request pricing flexibility for two or more MSAs in a single petition, provided that it submits supporting data disaggregated by MSA.
( b ) *Non-MSA.* ( 1 ) A price cap LEC will receive pricing flexibility with respect to those parts of a study area that fall outside of any MSA, provided that it provides data sufficient to support a finding that competitors have collocated in a number of wire centers in that non-MSA region sufficient to satisfy the criteria for the pricing flexibility sought in the petition, as set forth in this subpart, if the region at issue were an MSA.
( 2 ) The petitioner may aggregate data for all the non-MSA regions in a single study area for which it requests pricing flexibility in its petition.
( 3 ) A petitioner may request pricing flexibility in the non-MSA regions of two or more of its study areas, provided that it submits supporting data disaggregated by study area.