alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                        5
<LEGEND>
       This schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted  from
       Pacific Forest Corporation  December 31, 1997 financial statements and is
       qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                            0000866678
<NAME>                           PACIFIC FOREST CORPORATION

       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                  DEC-31-1997

<CASH>                                                        0
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              0
<PP&E>                                                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         0
<BONDS>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                      1,200
<OTHER-SE>                                                    (1,200)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  0
<SALES>                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              0
<CGS>                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              3,814
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               (3,814)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           (3,814)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  (3,814)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 (.00)
        



</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20A0721. CATERRO v. THE STATE.

Appellant has failed to file a brief and enumeration of errors by December 30,

2019, as ordered by the Court. As Appellant has abandoned the appeal, the appeal is

hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

January 09, 2020

01/09/2020
****Consumer Product Safety Commission**Brushcutters Require Cautious Use by Consumers**CPSC Document #5005**Consumers are finding a relatively new type of power tool on themarket for yard and garden work-brushcutters and combinationtrimmer/brushcutters. While the product is somewhat similar tothe flexible string weed trimmer, it has a much greater potentialfor serious and disabling injury. The brushcutter uses a rigidcutting blade in place of the flexible plastic string line. Theblade, made of steel or rigid plastic materials, permits thecutting of much heavier stands of brush and small diametersaplings, according to manufacturers. However, it can also cutthrough a hand, arm, or leg, something the flexible line trimmerwill not do.Several injury reports received by the Consumer Product SafetyCommission (CPSC) indicate the blade has caused severelacerations and near amputations. These accidents have happenedeven to professionals using the product.In one case, a man was cutting brush along the bottom of a boardfence. His wife, standing nearby trimming a hedge, was severelyinjured when he lost control and the brushcutter swung in an arctoward his wife. The blade cut into the wife's thigh and then herleft hand, nearly amputating it below the wrist. In anotherincident, two workers were cutting brush. One held down a saplingwith an axe, while the other attempted to cut through it with abrushcutter. The blade ricocheted off the sapling and into theassistant, severely cutting his right arm. In another case, a mancutting brush near a chain link fence reported that the bladethrew a small piece of wire from the fence into his eye. Inanother case, the blade was reported to have come off the end ofthe shaft while it was being operated, causing a foot injury.While only a few reports of injury have been received to date,the Commission's staff believes there may be many more injuriesif extra caution is not taken in using the product. The greatestdanger appears to be to bystanders or helpers. Users should readand observe safety and operating instructions in the owner'smanual.Among the safety precautions the user should take are:- Keep all people away from the operator during use. At least onemanufacturer recommends keeping people, including helpers, aminimum of 30 feet away.     Before starting, make sure the blade is properly secured to theshaft. Replace damaged blades.- Avoid cutting close to fences, sides of buildings, or othersuch obstacles that could cause the brushcutter to ricochet.Clear the work area of trash or hidden debris that could bethrown back at the operator or at a bystander. Use the proper cutting attachment for the job. Use the flexiblestring trimmer or hand tools for cutting near buildings, fences,etc., where the rigid blade may cause damage and injury.
-  Wear protective clothing, including safety eye goggles.    Please call the CPSC toll-free hotline on 800-638-CPSC to reportan injury with this type of product or to request information onpower equipment. A teletypewriter number for the hearing impairedis 800-638-8270.    009310

**
§ 216.102 Scope. The taking of small numbers of marine mammals under section 101(a)(5) (A) through (D) of the Marine Mammal Protection Act may be allowed only if the National Marine Fisheries Service: ( a ) Finds, based on the best scientific evidence available, that the total taking by the specified activity during the specified time period will have a negligible impact on species or stock of marine mammal(s) and will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of those species or stocks of marine mammals intended for subsistence uses;
( b ) Prescribes either regulations under § 216.106, or requirements and conditions contained within an incidental harassment authorization issued under § 216.107, setting forth permissible methods of taking and other means of effecting the least practicable adverse impact on the species or stock of marine mammal and its habitat and on the availability of the species or stock of marine mammal for subsistence uses, paying particular attention to rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of similar significance; and
( c ) Prescribes either regulations or requirements and conditions contained within an incidental harassment authorization, as appropriate, pertaining to the monitoring and reporting of such taking. The specific regulations governing certain specified activities are contained in subsequent subparts of this part.
- 
      - **  Home
      - **   About Us
      - **  Archives
      - **  News
      - **  Publications

### Contact Us

To provide feedback on the Community Policing Dispatch, e-mail the editorial board at CPDispatch@usdoj.gov.

To obtain details on COPS Office programs, publications, and resources, contact the COPS Office Response Center at 800-421-6770 or AskCopsRC@usdoj.gov

**U.S. Department of Justice** Office of Community Oriented Policing Services  145 N Street, N.E.  Washington, DC 20530 www.cops.usdoj.gov×  Menu  - Home
- About Us
- Archives
- News
- Publications
- Contact Us
**Second Annual Attorney General’s Award ForDistinguished Service in Policing: Honoring Law Enforcement Officers and Deputies**
October 2018 | Volume 11 | Issue 10

On Tuesday,  September 18, 2018, Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Justice Department  leadership honored the recipients of the Second Annual Attorney General’s  Award for Distinguished Service in Policing, recognizing the exceptional work  of 25 law enforcement officers and deputies from 12 jurisdictions across the  country.

The Attorney  General’s Award recognizes individual state, local, and tribal sworn  rank-and-file police officers and deputies for exceptional efforts in policing.  The awarded officers and deputies have demonstrated active engagement with the  community in one of three areas: criminal investigations, field operations or  innovations in community policing. The Department received 207 nominations for  469 individuals ranging from state police departments, to local police, to  campus public safety agencies. This award highlights the work that officers and  deputies do to prevent, intervene in, and respond to crime and public safety  issues.

The *Community Policing  Dispatch* e-newsletter will dedicate the November issue to highlighting the award  recipients of the Attorney General’s Award for Distinguished Service in  Policing. The full list of  award recipients may be found in the Department  of Justice’s Office of Public Affairs press release.

Tweet
**Subscribe to Email Updates**
To sign up for monthly updates or to access your subscriber preferences, please enter your email address in the Subscribe box.
Email
The Community Policing Dispatch is the e-newsletter of the COPS Office. 

The Community Policing Dispatch is the e-newsletter of the COPS Office. 

**Explore**
- Home
- About Us
- Archives
- News
- Publications
- Contact Us
**Connect With Us**
Want to stay connected with the COPS office?  Follow us on social media!
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
 FOIA 

 No FEAR Act 

 Open Government 

 Plain Writing 

 USA.gov 

 Legal Policies and Disclaimers 

 Language Access Plan 

 DOJ Privacy Policy
#### § 221.75 Has OMB approved the information collection provisions of this subpart?

Yes. This rule contains provisions that would collect information from the public. It therefore requires approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.* (PRA). According to the PRA, a Federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number that indicates OMB approval. OMB has reviewed the information collection in this rule and approved it under OMB control number 1094-0001.
SUPREME COURT.

#### Abram Myers agt. Joseph D. White.

A *notice of appeal*which fairly apprises the opposite party that the damages are excessive, is sufficiently specific under section 371 of the Code to call upon such party to make an offer.

If such party remains silent, he does so at his peril, and if the verdict on appeal is reduced ten dollars, the appellant is entitled to costs.

*Albany General*Term, September, 1868.

*Before*Peckham, Ingalls *and*Hogeboom, *Justices.*

Banker *&*Rising) *for plaintiff.*

Forsyth *&*Fursman, *for defendant.*

This was an appeal by the plaintiff *from an*order of the Rensselaer county court, refusing to strike out 'the costs which had been awarded to the defendant.

The plaintiff recovered a judgment before the justice, December 6, 1866, for $99 damages and $18.65 costs.

The defendant appealed to the county court, where, on the new trial, the plaintiff recovered $61.28. That part of the notice of appeal upon which the case turned was as follows :

“5. The defendant claims that the judgment should have been more favorable to him, in the following particulars:

That the judgment for damages is for too large a sum and'ought not to have been given for more than $33.33 damages with $5 costs, instead of $18.65, if not so amended should be reversed.”

The plaintiff did not make any offer.

The order, allowing costs to the defendant, was affirmed.

The opinion was given by Justice Peckham, approving the case of *Fox*agt. *Nellis*(25 *How.,*144).
#### §§ 17.109-17.199 [Reserved]
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 486 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 223

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 486

                          [Report No. 103-399]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To provide for the addition of the Truman Farm Home to the Harry S 
        Truman National Historic Site in the State of Missouri.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 20, 1993

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed

                                                 Union Calendar No. 223
103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 486

                          [Report No. 103-399]

  To provide for the addition of the Truman Farm Home to the Harry S 
        Truman National Historic Site in the State of Missouri.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 1993

  Mr. Wheat introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

                           November 20, 1993

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for the addition of the Truman Farm Home to the Harry S 
        Truman National Historic Site in the State of Missouri.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROPERTY ACQUISITION.

    The first section of the Act entitled ``An Act to establish the 
Harry S Truman National Historic Site in the State of Missouri, and for 
other purposes'', approved May 23, 1983 (97 Stat. 193), is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) The Secretary is further authorized to acquire from Jackson 
County, Missouri, by donation, the real property commonly referred to 
as the Truman Farm Home located in Grandview, Jackson County, Missouri, 
together with associated lands and related structures, comprising 
approximately 5.2 acres.-'-'-.
    ``(d) The Secretary is authorized and directed to provide 
appropriate political subdivisions of the State of Missouri with 
technical and planning assistance for the development and 
implementation of plans, programs, regulations, or other means for 
minimizing the adverse effects on the Truman Farm Home of the 
development and use of adjacent lands.''.
```
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5184

To enable the Secretary of Agriculture to adjust the base period of milk

production when calculating refunds of assessments made in calendar

year 1994 under section 204(h) of the Agricultural Act of 1949 on

milk producers affected by floods and excessive moisture during calendar

year 1993.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 5, 1994

Mr. GUNDERSON (for himself and Mr. ROBERTS) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To enable the Secretary of Agriculture to adjust the base

period of milk production when calculating refunds of

assessments made in calendar year 1994 under section

204(h) of the Agricultural Act of 1949 on milk producers

affected by floods and excessive moisture during calendar

year 1993.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PRODUCER REFUNDS.

4 Section 204(h) of the Agricultural Act of 1949 (7

5 U.S.C. 1446e(h)) is amended—
2

HR 5184 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (2)(B), by inserting before the

2 semicolon at the end the following: ‘‘(except that, in

3 the case of a producer who owns and operates a

4 farm in North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska,

5 Kansas, Missouri, Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, or Wis6 consin, the marketings of the producer for calendar

7 year 1994 may be compared to the marketings of

8 the producer for calendar year 1992 or 1993)’’; and

9 (2) in paragraph (3)—

10 (A) in the first sentence, by inserting be11 fore the period at the end the following: ‘‘(ex12 cept that, in the case of a producer who owns

13 or operates a farm in North Dakota, South Da14 kota, Nebraska, Kansas, Missouri, Illinois,

15 Iowa, Minnesota, or Wisconsin, the marketings

16 of the producer in calendar year 1994 may be

17 compared to the marketings of the producer for

18 calendar year 1992 or 1993)’’; and

19 (B) by adding at the end the following new

20 sentence: ‘‘In the case of a producer who owns

21 or operates a farm in North Dakota, South Da22 kota, Nebraska, Kansas, Missouri, Illinois,

23 Iowa, Minnesota, or Wisconsin and who has not

24 increased marketings in calendar year 1994 rel25 ative to marketings in calendar year 1992, a re-
3

HR 5184 IH

1 fund due the producer may not be paid by the

2 Secretary until October 1, 1995.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 10.8


 


Amendment No. 1 to the

KLX Energy Services, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan


 


This Amendment No. 1 (“Amendment”)
to the KLX Energy Services, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”) is made and adopted by the KLX
Energy Services, Inc. (the “Company”), subject to approval of the stockholders of the Company. Capitalized
terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings given thereto in the Plan.


 


WHEREAS, on September 13, 2018, the
Board of Directors adopted, and the sole stockholder of the Company approved, the Plan;


 


WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 16 of
the Plan, the Company may amend the Plan at any time, contingent on approval by the stockholders of the Company for any amendment
(x) relating to the aggregate number of shares which may be issued under the Plan (other than an adjustment provided for in
Section 14 of the Plan) or (y) for which stockholder approval is required under applicable laws, rules and regulations,
including, without limitation, Sections 423 and 424 of the Code; and


 


WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has determined
that it is advisable and in the best interest of the Company to amend the Plan to increase the number of Shares authorized for
issuance under the Plan by 1,500,000.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the
Plan is hereby amended as follows, subject to approval by the stockholders of the Company:


 


1. Amendment of Section 2 of the
Plan. The first sentence of Section 2 of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


 


“Under the Plan, there is available an aggregate of not
more than 1,700,000 shares of Stock (subject to adjustment as provided in Section 14) for sale pursuant to the exercise of
options (Options) granted under the Plan.”


 


2. Effect on the Plan. Except as
expressly modified by this Amendment, all other terms and provisions of the Plan shall be unchanged and shall remain in full force
and effect.


 


3. Governing Law. Except as to matters
of federal law, this Amendment and all actions taken thereunder shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws
of the State of Florida.


 


This Amendment was approved by the Board
of Directors on June 23, 2020 and by the stockholders of the Company on July 24, 2020.
Order entered August 6, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00379-CR

PEDRO RANGEL JR, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12-31321-Y

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to make findings of fact regarding whether appellant 

has been deprived of the reporter’s record because of ineffective counsel, indigence, or for any 

other reason.

 The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal. If 

the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute the appeal, it shall 

make a finding to that effect.

 If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, it shall next 

determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs 

for the reporter’s record. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, the 

trial court shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial 

court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective 

representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds 

appellant is not indigent, it shall determine whether retained counsel has abandoned the 

appeal.
 The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who 

recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter’s explanation for the delay 

in filing the reporter’s record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can 

be filed. 

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record, containing the written findings of fact, 

any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date 

of this order.

The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal 

shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, 

whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
California Home ARB: Home Search Site Map Software ContactUs AQD: Home



### Select 8 Summary FAQs PM10 High National 24-Hour Average Monitoring Sites 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Eastern Kern 8-Hour Ozone Planning Area Kern County Canebrake 43.1 63.3 43.7 38.6 43.3 Mojave-923 Poole Street 68.0 52.8 35.7 * 120.2

Notes: PM10 statistics may include data that are related to an exceptional event

. * There was insufficient (or no) data available to dete rmine the value. Go to: Data Statistics Home Page Select 8 Summary Start Pag e