alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Seibert v. The Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company, *Appellant.*

Railroad: double damages fob injury to stock. A railroad company is not liable in double damages, under tbe 43rd section of tbe railroad law, (R. S., § 809,) for an injury to stock wbicb does not result from direct or actual collision with the engine or cars, as for instance, where the animal is killed by the servants of the company in an attempt to extricate it from a trestle into which it has fallen.

*Appeal from Monroe Circuit Court.*— Hon. John T. Redd, J udge.

Reversed.

*566*John Montgomery, Jr.,*for appellant,

cited *Lafferty v. Hannibal § St. Joseph R. R. Co.,*44 Mo. 292; *Hughes v. Hannibal § St. Joseph R. R. Go.,*66 Mo. 326 ; *Indianapolis, etc., R. R. Co. v. McBrown,*46 Ind. *229; Ohio, etc., Ry. Co. v. Cole,*41 Ind. 331; *Louisville, etc., Ry. Co. v. Smith,*58 Ind. 576; *B. S> P. Ry. Co. v. Thomas,*60 Ind. 107; 1 Thompson on Neg., (1 Ed.) p'. 531, § 28 ; *A., T. § S. F. R. R. Co.v. Jones,*20 Kas. 529.

Hough, J.

This was an action brought in 1877 under the 43rd section of the railroad corporation law, (R. S., § 809,) to recover double the value of a horse belonging to plaintiff, alleged to have been run against and killed by the engines and cars of the Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway. The plaintiff’s testimony tended to establish the allegations of his petition. The defendant’s testimony, on the other hand, tended to show that the horse was not struck by the engine or cars, but that it ran ahead of a moving train and jumped into a eei'tain trestle supporting defendant’s track, and in being taken out by defendant’s servants, by means of ropes attached to the engine, was killed. The court instructed the jury to find for the plaintiff-, even though they should believe from the evidence that the horse was not struck by the engine or cars, but was killed by the servants of the defendant in their attempt to remove it from the trestle. It was decided by this court in the case of *Lafferty v. Hannibal & St. Joseph R. R. Co.,*44 Mo. 291, that the injuries contemplated by the 43rd section of the railroad law are such only as result from a direct or actual collision of the engines or ears, with the animal injui’ed. *Hughes v. Railroad Co., 66*Mo. 325. The instruction of the circuit court not being in conformity with this decision, is, therefore, erroneous. The plaintiff- can, undoubtedly, recover in a proper action for any injury to his horse, negligently inflicted by the servants of the defendant, but he cannot maintain an action under the 43rd sec*567tion of the railroad law for double damages, unless the injury ivas the result of actual collision, occasioned by a failure to fence as required by that section. The judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded.

The other judges concur.
§ 23.75 How can I trade internationally in vicuña (*Vicugna vicugna*)? ( a ) *U.S. and foreign general provisions.* The import, export, or re-export of specimens of vicuña must meet the requirements of this section and the other requirements of this part (see subparts B and C of this part for prohibitions and application procedures). Certain populations of vicuña are listed in Appendix II for the exclusive purpose of allowing international trade in wool sheared from live vicuñas, cloth made from such wool, and products manufactured from such wool or cloth. All other specimens of vicuña are deemed to be specimens of a species included in Appendix I.
( b ) *Vicuña Convention* means the Convenio para la Conservación y Manejo de la Vicuña, of which vicuña range countries are signatories.
( c ) *Vicuña logotype* means the logotype adopted by the vicuña range countries under the Vicuña Convention.
( d ) *Country of origin* for the purposes of the vicuña label means the name of the country where the vicuña wool in the cloth or product originated.
( e ) *Wool sheared from live vicuñas, cloth from such wool, and products manufactured from such wool or cloth* may be imported from Appendix-II populations only when they meet the labeling requirements in paragraph (f) of this section.
( f ) *Labeling requirements.* Except for cloth containing CITES pre-Convention wool of vicuña, you may import, export, or re-export vicuña cloth only when the reverse side of the cloth bears the vicuña logotype and the selvages bear the words “VICUÑA—COUNTRY OF ORIGIN”. Specimens of other products manufactured from vicuña wool or cloth must bear a label that has the vicuña logotype and the designation “VICUÑA—COUNTRY OF ORIGIN—ARTESANIA”. Each specimen must bear such a label. For import into the United States of raw wool sheared from live vicuña, see the labeling requirements in 50 CFR 17.40(m).
[79 FR 30428, May 27, 2014]
#### §§ 218.78-218.79 [Reserved]
July 11, 2016

US Department of Transportation

Docket Oper ations, M

- 30

West Building Ground Floor

Room W12

- 140

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

To Whom It May Concern:

Dynamic Aviation Group, Inc. is requesting an addition to the exemption from Title 14 of the

Code of Federal Regulations part 137 .53(c)(2). This exemption is based on being in the public’s

best interest to not jettison spray loads over congested areas and the ability to show an

equivalent level of safety with not installing a jettison system.

Dynamic Aviation Group, Inc. would like to add the following aircraft to the exemption nu mber

7827J:

N80R

N84G

N87Q

Thank you very much for your attention to this. If you need any additional information, or have

any questions, please feel free to contact me.

Sincerely,

Michael O. Rosolina

Flight Operations Manager

– Aerial Application

Dynamic Aviation Group, Inc.

P.O. Box 7

Bridgewater, VA 22812

Phone: (540) 828

- 6070

Fax: (540) 828

- 4031

mrosolina@dynamicaviation.com
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 29, 2014

s0721

Order 

Clerk

July 29, 2014

148666

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148666

COA: 317473

Kent CC: 10-001253-FC

JOSE CRUZ ALONZO, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 27, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Case 16-26126 Doc 5 Filed 08/15/16 Entered 08/15/16 14:10:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-26126 Doc 5 Filed 08/15/16 Entered 08/15/16 14:10:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
#### § 100.1 Purpose.

The regulations in this part implement the Federal Subsistence Management Program on public lands within the State of Alaska.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5122

To require Federal agencies that own or lease motor vehicles to keep accurate

records of the use of those vehicles by Federal employees, and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 28, 1994

Mr. MANN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Government Operations

A BILL

To require Federal agencies that own or lease motor vehicles

to keep accurate records of the use of those vehicles

by Federal employees, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REQUIREMENTS REGARDING USE OF FEDERAL

4 AGENCY MOTOR VEHICLES BY FEDERAL EM5 PLOYEES.

6 (a) RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENT.—The head of

7 each Federal agency that owns or leases motor vehicles

8 shall keep accurate records of the use of those vehicles

9 by Federal employees, including the identity of the Fed-
2

•HR 5122 IH

1 eral employees who use those vehicles and the dates, times,

2 and locations of that use.

3 (b) LIABILITY OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEES FOR MONE4 TARY PENALTIES FOR MOTOR VEHICLE PARKING VIOLA5 TIONS.—

6 (1) LIABILITY.—An individual who is an em7 ployee of a Federal agency that owns or leases a

8 motor vehicle and who is authorized to use the vehi9 cle at the time any parking violation under State or

10 local law is committed with the vehicle shall be liable

11 for any final monetary penalty that is assessed for

12 that violation.

13 (2) NOTIFICATION TO FEDERAL EMPLOYEES.—

14 The head of each Federal agency that owns or leases

15 a motor vehicle shall inform each Federal employee

16 who is authorized to use a motor vehicle owned or

17 leased by the agency of the potential liability of the

18 employee under paragraph (1).

19 (c) PROVISION OF INFORMATION TO STATE AND

20 LOCAL GOVERNMENTS.—Upon request from a State or

21 local government made for the purpose of collecting an

22 unpaid final monetary penalty for a parking violation

23 under the laws of the State or local government alleged

24 to have been committed with a motor vehicle owned or

25 leased by the Federal agency, the head of a Federal agen-
3

•HR 5122 IH

1 cy shall provide to the State or local government the name

2 and address of each Federal employee who was authorized

3 to use the motor vehicle at the time the violation is alleged

4 to have occurred.

5 (d) PAYMENT OF EXISTING PENALTIES.—Notwith6 standing any other provision of law, the head of each Fed7 eral agency that owns or leases a motor vehicle shall, with

8 amounts available for travel by employees of the agency,

9 pay by not later than 30 days after the date of the enact10 ment of this Act, all final monetary penalties assessed be11 fore the date of the enactment of this Act for parking vio12 lations committed under the laws of a State or local gov13 ernment with a motor vehicle owned or leased by the Fed14 eral agency.

Æ
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 134161 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 134161 COA: 273321 Calhoun CC: 99-001331-FH FRANKLIN BALLARD, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 20, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

d0917 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 24, 2007

Clerk
Case 16-26948 Doc 29 Filed 09/20/17 Entered 09/21/17 09:54:44 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT
32.1: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of China Water Group, Inc.
(the “Company”) certifies that:




1.           The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended June 30,
2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  April
      3, 2009
              /s/ Wenge FangWenge
      Fang, Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>




















<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         113,346                  96,836
<SECURITIES>                                    73,536                  33,827
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,932                  31,526
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (5,533)                 (3,623)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               234,753                 155,566
<PP&E>                                          67,520                  43,765
<DEPRECIATION>                                (20,610)                (15,342)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 297,218                 204,686
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           97,687                  58,278
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           156                     148
<OTHER-SE>                                     199,375                 146,260
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   297,218                 204,686
<SALES>                                        130,900                  84,450
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               187,700                 121,000
<CGS>                                            7,736                   6,291
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,378                  18,048
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               125,335                  82,616
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 42,013                  24,976
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,869                   5,451
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             33,144                  19,525
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,144                  19,525
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.44                    0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.39                    0.25


</TABLE>
§ 15.12 Requirements. ( a ) No person shall import into the United States any exotic bird except as may be permitted under the terms of a valid permit issued pursuant to the provisions of subpart C of this part and 50 CFR part 13, or in accordance with the provisions of subparts D-F of this part 15, or in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) Any exotic bird can be imported to the United States if it was legally exported from the United States with a permit issued by the Service's Office of Management Authority, provided that the import is by the same person who exported the bird, the import is accompanied by a copy of the cleared CITES export permit or certificate issued by the Service that was used to export the exotic bird, and the Service is satisfied that the same bird is being imported as is indicted on the aforementioned permit or certificate.
§ 18.150 Monitoring. ( a ) Operators must work with PSOs to apply mitigation measures and must recognize the authority of PSOs, up to and including stopping work, except where doing so poses a significant safety risk to personnel.
( b ) Duties of PSOs include watching for and identifying sea otters, recording observation details, documenting presence in any applicable monitoring zone, identifying and documenting potential harassment, and working with operators to implement all appropriate mitigation measures.
( c ) A sufficient number of PSOs will be available to meet the following criteria: 100 percent monitoring of exclusion zones during all daytime periods of underwater noise-generating work; a maximum of 4 consecutive hours on watch per PSO; a maximum of approximately 12 hours on watch per day per PSO.
( d ) All PSOs will complete a training course designed to familiarize individuals with monitoring and data collection procedures. A field crew leader with prior experience as a sea otter observer will supervise the PSO team. Initially, new or inexperienced PSOs will be paired with experienced PSOs so that the quality of marine mammal observations and data recording is kept consistent. Resumes for candidate PSOs will be made available for the Service to review.
( e ) Observers will be provided with reticule binoculars (10×42), big-eye binoculars or spotting scopes (30×), inclinometers, and range finders. Field guides, instructional handbooks, maps, and a contact list will also be made available.
( f ) Observers will collect data using the following procedures: ( 1 ) All data will be recorded onto a field form or database.
( 2 ) Global positioning system data, sea state, wind force, and weather will be collected at the beginning and end of a monitoring period, every hour in between, at the change of an observer, and upon sightings of sea otters.
( 3 ) Observation records of sea otters will include date; time; the observer's locations, heading, and speed (if moving); weather; visibility; number of animals; group size and composition (adults/juveniles); and the location of the animals (or distance and direction from the observer).
( 4 ) Observation records will also include initial behaviors of the sea otters, descriptions of project activities and underwater sound levels being generated, the position of sea otters relative to applicable monitoring and mitigation zones, any mitigation measures applied, and any apparent reactions to the project activities before and after mitigation.
( 5 ) For all sea otters in or near a mitigation zone, observers will record the distance from the vessel to the sea otter upon initial observation, the duration of the encounter, and the distance at last observation in order to monitor cumulative sound exposures.
( 6 ) Observers will note any instances of animals lingering close to or traveling with vessels for prolonged periods of time.
#### § 260.88 Political activity.

All inspectors and licensed samplers are forbidden, during the period of their respective appointments or licenses, to take an active part in political management or in political campaigns. Political activities in city, county, State, or national elections, whether primary or regular, or in behalf of any party or candidate, or any measure to be voted upon, are prohibited. This applies to all appointees or licensees, including, but not limited to, temporary and cooperative employees and employees on leave of absence with or without pay. Willful violation of this section will constitute grounds for dismissal in the case of appointees and revocation of licenses in the case of licensees.
§ 216.115 Accounting and identification of gray whales. ( a ) *Images and samples.* NMFS hunt observers, Tribal hunt observers, and members of the Makah Indian Tribe may collect still or motion pictures as needed to document hunting and training approaches, strikes (successful and unsuccessful attempts), and landings. Persons designated by NMFS and by the Makah Indian Tribe may also collect, store, transfer, and analyze specimen samples from struck gray whales. Such designated personnel should make every reasonable attempt to collect genetic samples from struck whales without compromising the safety of the hunt.
( b ) *Identification and accounting of gray whales* — ( 1 ) *Winter/spring hunts.* Based on the best available evidence, the Regional Administrator will determine in writing whether a gray whale that is struck in a winter/spring hunt is a WNP gray whale or a PCFG whale or neither, or cannot be identified due to a lack of photographs or genetic data useful for making identifications. A whale affirmatively identified as a PCFG whale will be counted accordingly. A whale that cannot be identified will be presumed to be a PCFG whale in accordance with the proportions specified in § 216.114(d)(2) and will be counted accordingly. If the sex of a whale that is counted, in whole or in part, as a PCFG whale cannot be identified, the proportions specified in § 216.114(d)(2) will be applied.
( 2 ) *Summer/fall hunts.* Based on available evidence, the Regional Administrator will determine in writing whether a gray whale that is struck in a summer/fall hunt is a WNP gray whale or cannot be identified due to a lack of photographs or genetic data useful for making identifications. A gray whale that cannot be identified as a WNP gray whale will be counted as a PCFG whale. If the sex of a whale that is counted as a PCFG whale cannot be identified, the proportions specified in § 216.114(d)(2) will be applied.
( 3 ) *Hunting and training approaches.* Gray whales subjected to hunting or training approaches are presumed to be PCFG whales in accordance with the proportions specified in § 216.114(d)(2).
( 4 ) *Unauthorized strikes.* If a Tribal member strikes an ENP gray whale without authorization under this subpart, the strike will be counted against the total number of strikes allowed under this subpart and will be counted against the United States' share of any applicable catch limit established by the International Whaling Commission.
Exhibit 32.1

PRECISION OPTICS CORPORATION, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

We, Richard E. Forkey, Chief Executive Officer and Jack P. Dreimiller, Chief Financial Officer of Precision Optics Corporation, Inc. (the "Company"),
certify, pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|DATE: September 24, 2003 |                                                                                                               
|------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         | /s/RICHARD E. FORKEYRichard E. Forkey, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President and Treasurer
|                         | /s/JACK P. DREIMILLERJack P. Dreimiller, Senior Vice President Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Clerk     

---

QuickLinks
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER****Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)**          I, Randy K. Ferrell, as the President and Chief Executive Officer of FauquierBankshares, Inc., certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, which accompanies thiscertification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of FauquierBankshares, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certificationis made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shallnot be relied upon for any other purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaims anyobligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.   Date: November 10, 2006 /s/ Randy K. Ferrell     Randy K. Ferrell  President and Chief Executive Officer
No. 11-9733.

#### Negrette-Medina *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.