alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 26.33 Special regulations. ( a ) Special regulations shall be issued for public use, access, and recreation within certain individual national wildlife refuges where there is a need to amend, modify, relax or make more stringent the regulations contained in this subchapter C. The issued special regulations will supplement the provisions in this part 26.
( b ) Special recreational use regulations may contain the following items: ( 1 ) Recreational uses authorized.
( 2 ) Seasons, period, or specific time of use.
( 3 ) Description of areas open to recreation.
( 4 ) Specific conditions or requirements.
( 5 ) Other provisions.
( 6 ) Special regulations for public use, access, and recreation are published in the daily issue of the Federal Register and may be codified in the Code of Federal Regulations. They shall be issued in compliance with procedures contained in the Departmental Manual.
§ 270.8 Nomination and appointment of Council members. ( a ) Within 30 days after a Council is established, NMFS will solicit nominations for Council members from the sectors represented on the Council in accordance with the approved charter. If the harvesters and receivers represented on the Council are engaged in business in two or more states, but within the geographic area of the Council, the nominations made under this section must, to the extent practicable, result in equitable representation for those states. Nominees must be knowledgeable and experienced with regard to the activities of, or have been actively engaged in the business of, the sector that such person will represent on the Council. Therefore, a resume will be required for each nominee.
( b ) In accordance with 16 U.S.C. 4009(f), NMFS will, within 60 days after the end of the 30-day period, appoint the members of the Council from among the nominees.
§ 221.22 How do I file a notice of intervention and response? ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) To intervene as a party to the hearing process, you must: ( i ) Be a license party; and
( ii ) File with the Office of Habitat Conservation, at the address provided in § 221.2, a notice of intervention and a written response to any request for a hearing within 20 days after the deadline in § 221.21(a)(2).
( 2 ) A notice of intervention and response must be limited to one or more of the issues of material fact raised in the hearing request and may not raise additional issues.
( b ) *Content.* In your notice of intervention and response you must explain your position with respect to the issues of material fact raised in the hearing request under § 221.21(b). ( 1 ) If you agree with the information provided by NOAA under § 221.20(a) or by the requester under § 221.21(b), your response may refer to NOAA's explanation or the requester's hearing request for support.
( 2 ) If you wish to rely on additional information or analysis, your response must provide the same level of detail with respect to the additional information or analysis as required under § 221.21(b).
( 3 ) Your notice of intervention and response must also indicate whether or not you consent to service by electronic means under § 221.13(c)(4) and, if so, by what means.
( c ) *Witnesses and exhibits.* Your response and notice must also list the witnesses and exhibits that you intend to present at the hearing, other than solely for impeachment purposes. ( 1 ) For each witness listed, you must provide: ( i ) His or her name, address, telephone number, and qualifications; and
( ii ) A brief narrative summary of his or her expected testimony; and
( 2 ) For each exhibit listed, you must specify whether it is in the license proceeding record.
( d ) *Page limits.* ( 1 ) For each disputed factual issue, the information provided under paragraph (b) of this section (excluding citations to scientific studies, literature, and other documented information supporting your opinions) may not exceed two pages.
( 2 ) For each witness, the information provided under paragraph (c)(1) of this section may not exceed one page.
```

INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT

To the Board of Directors
Navistar Financial Securities Corporation

We have examined management's assertion that Navistar Financial Corporation (the "Company") complied with the
minimum servicing standards identified and included in the accompanying Management's Assertion Concerning
Compliance as of and for the year ended October 31, 2002.  The Company's management is responsible for
compliance with those minimum-servicing standards.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute
of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the
Company's compliance with its minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with its
minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing
standards as of and for the year ended October 31, 2002, is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

    Deloitte & Touche LLP
    Chicago, IL
    October 16, 2003
```
#### § 217.261 Effective dates.

The regulations in this subpart are effective from October 13, 2023, through October 12, 2028.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, James G. Murphy, Chief Financial Officer ofImmunicon Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify, that:

 

(1) The Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q forthe quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 (the “Form 10-Q) fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ James G. Murphy     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| James G. Murphy         |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| March 21, 2004          |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jupitermedia Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Christopher J. Baudouin, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Christopher J. Baudouin                                                              
|Christopher J. Baudouin Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer May 10, 2006
[Crim. No. 235.

Third Appellate District.

October 27, 1914.]

#### THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. F. GALLI, Appellant.

Criminal Law—Sale or Alcoholic Liquors in “No-License” Territory—Judgment Affirmed.—On this appeal from a judgment - of conviction upon an information charging defendant with selling alcoholic liquors in “no-lieense” territory, there being no appearance by the defendant after the filing of the transcript of the phonographic report of the trial, the judgment is ordered affirmed.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Humboldt County. George D. Murray, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

E. W. Wilson, for Appellant.

TJ. S. Webb, Attorney-General, and J. Charles Jones, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.

THE COURT.

Defendant was convicted at his trial by a jury upon an information charging him with the crime of selling alcoholic liquors in “no-license” territory in the county of Humboldt and was sentenced to pay a fine of four hundred dollars, in default of which he be imprisoned in the county jail of said county for the term of one day for each two dollars of said fine.

*634The judgment was entered on June 9, 1913. Notice of appeal was duly given and demand to have the phonographic report of the trial written. Such transcript was written and was filed in this court on June 27, 1913, since which time no further steps have been taken by defendant in the prosecution of his appeal. The attorney-general, on the call of the calendar, moved that the cause be submitted on the record. There was no appearance by defendant.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### § 218.62 Permissible methods of taking.

(a) Under an LOA issued pursuant to § 216.106 of this subchapter and § 218.66, the Holder of the LOA (hereinafter “USAF”) may incidentally, but not intentionally, take marine mammals within the area described in § 218.60(b) by Level A and Level B harassment (defined in section 3(18)(B) of the Marine Mammal Protection Act) associated training and testing activities described in § 218.60(c) provided the activity is in compliance with all terms, conditions, and requirements of the regulations in this subpart and the applicable LOA.

(b) The incidental take of marine mammals by the activities listed in § 218.60(c) is limited to the species and stocks listed in table 1 to this paragraph (b). Only Level B Harassment of Rice's whales is authorized. Level A Harassment and level B Harassment of the two dolphin stocks are authorized.

| Common name | Scientific name | Stock |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Atlantic spotted dolphin | *Stenella frontalis* | Northern Gulf of Mexico. |
| Common Bottlenose dolphin | *Tursiops truncatus* | Northern Gulf of Mexico Continental Shelf. |
| Rice's whale | *Balaenoptera ricei* | No Stock Designated. |

Table 1 to Paragraph (b)
Case 16-27071 Doc 5 Filed 08/23/16 Entered 08/23/16 15:58:12 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-27071 Doc 5 Filed 08/23/16 Entered 08/23/16 15:58:12 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
# EUR-Lex - 11965F/PRO/PRI/21 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11965F/PRO/PRI/21

**TREATY ESTABLISHING A SINGLE COUNCIL AND A SINGLE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, PROTOCOL ON THE PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, CHAPTER VII: GENERAL PROVISIONS, ARTICLE 21 **

*
Official Journal 152 , 13/07/1967 P. 0016 *

++++

ARTICLE 21

ARTICLES 12 TO 15 AND ARTICLE 18 SHALL APPLY TO THE JUDGES , THE ADVOCATES-GENERAL , THE REGISTRAR AND THE ASSISTANT RAPPORTEURS OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE , WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE 3 OF THE PROTOCOLS ON THE STATUTE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE CONCERNING IMMUNITY FROM LEGAL PROCEEDINGS OF JUDGES AND ADVOCATES-GENERAL .
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

September 22, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00276

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.C.L., A CHILD

From the 285th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2020

- PA

- 00477 The Honorable Kimberly Bur ley , Judge Pres iding



### ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating the appellan t s ’ parental rights, which must be disposed of by this court within 180 day s of the date the first notice of appeal is filed. Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2. Appellant R.E. filed a notice of appeal on July 7, 2021 and appellant M.L. filed a notice of appeal on July 9, 2021

. Thus, the 180

- day deadline in which this court must di spose o f this appeal is January 3 , 202 2 , an d briefs from both appellants are d u e September 22, 2021

. On September 2 0 , 2021, M.L

. filed a motion requesting a twenty

- one day extensio n unti l October 1 3 , 2021 to file h i s appellant’s brief

.

M.L.’ s motion is GRANTE D
, and h i s a ppell ant’s brief is due no later than October 1 3 , 202 1 . Given the time constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.

_________________________________ Lori I. Valenzuela , Justice

IN WITN ESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 22nd day of September, 2021

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ
, Clerk of C ourt
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P335A Bowling Green Legacy: A Guide for Law Enforcement and CommunitiesThis guide is designed as a tool for law enforcement and community stakeholders to facilitate discussions in conjunction with screenings of the 14-minute Not In Our Town film, A Bowling Green Legacy. Produced in collaboration with the COPS Office, the film examines how college campus leaders at Bowling Green State University in Ohio took action after racist incidents swept their town. In partnership with campus and city law enforcement as well as civic and community leaders, they launched a successful community- and campus-wide Not In Our Town campaign to build a safer, more inclusive Bowling Green. The guide provides discussion questions and tips for organizing internal law enforcement agency and community screenings, information about hate speech and bias, and supplemental resources. Used together, the film and guide can help agencies and community groups work together to prevent hate crimes, improve hate crime reporting, and support victims with adequate response.By Ryan Hunt, Paul Di Lella, Cassandra BelsonCategories: School and Campus SafetyLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p335Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFBook • Oct 2015Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 02:20 (UTC-5) in 0.19 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
#### § 226.101 Purpose and scope.

The regulations contained in this part identify those habitats designated by the Secretary of Commerce as critical, under section 4 of the Act, for endangered and threatened species under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Commerce. Those species are enumerated at § 223.102 of this chapter if threatened and at § 224.101 of this chapter if endangered. For regulations pertaining to the designation of critical habitat, see part 424 of this title; for regulations pertaining to prohibitions against the adverse modification or destruction of critical habitat, see part 402 of this title. Additional information regarding designated critical habitats that is not provided in this section may be obtained upon request to the Office of Protected Resources (*see* § 222.102, definition of “Office of Protected Resources”).

[77 FR 25622, May 1, 2012]
Order filed October 6, 2016 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00332-CR

____________

EX PARTE JORGE ALBERTO PEREZ

On Appeal from the 434th Judicial District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 11-DCR-056797A

ORDER

On the State’s motion, oral argument in this appeal has been rescheduled for 

Thursday, November 10, 2016, at 1:30 PM.

The State shall ensure any additional record volumes are filed in sufficient 

time for it to file its brief by October 20, 2016. 

Appellant may file a reply brief to address any point raised by the additional 

record volumes and/or the State’s brief. The reply brief is due by November 3, 2016.

No further extensions shall be granted.

PER CURIAM
<page>					  EXHIBIT 32.02




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Portfolio
Strategy Fund L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I,
Christian Angstadt, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management
Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.






By:	  /s/	Christian Angstadt

Name:		Christian Angstadt
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		March 28, 2008
Special Awards



 EXHIBIT 10.3(b) 
 Schedule of special incentive awards to certain named executive officers 
 SPECIAL AWARDS

 Background 
 From time to time unusual
events merit awards for outstanding individual performance outside of the short-term incentive plan. Special events such as restructurings, mergers and acquisitions or comprehensive programs have been the basis for special recognition in the past.

 *    *    *    *    * 
 2006 AWARDS 
  

					
	 •     James M. Delaney
	    	3,000	    	January 24, 2006 grant of shares of restricted stock 100% vesting January 23, 2009
	
	2007 AWARDS
			
	 •     Stephen E. Makarewicz
	    	5,000	    	March 1, 2007 grant of shares of restricted stock 100% vesting February 28, 2010
```

[108th Congress Public Law 112]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ112.108]

[[Page 117 STAT. 1326]]

Public Law 108-112
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   1905 West Blue Heron Boulevard in West Palm Beach, Florida, as the 
    ``Judge Edward Rodgers Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Nov. 11, 
                         2003 -  [H.R. 2075]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1905 
West Blue Heron Boulevard in West Palm Beach, Florida, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Judge Edward Rodgers Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Judge Edward Rodgers Post 
Office Building''.

    Approved November 11, 2003.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2075:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 149 (2003):
            Sept. 30, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 29, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
§ 73.811 LPFM power and antenna height requirements. ( a ) *Maximum facilities.* LPFM stations will be authorized to operate with maximum facilities of 100 watts ERP at 30 meters HAAT. An LPFM station with a HAAT that exceeds 30 meters will not be permitted to operate with an ERP greater than that which would result in a 60 dBu contour of 5.6 kilometers. In no event will an ERP less than one watt be authorized. No facility will be authorized in excess of one watt ERP at 450 meters HAAT.
( b ) *Minimum facilities.* LPFM stations may not operate with facilities less than 50 watts ERP at 30 meters HAAT or the equivalent necessary to produce a 60 dBu contour that extends at least 4.7 kilometers.
[78 FR 2105, Jan. 9, 2013]
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 14-1208V

Filed: May 29, 2015

Unpublished

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

MICHAEL LERG, *

*

Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

v. * Meningococcal Vaccine; Shoulder Injury

* Related to Vaccine Administration;

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * SIRVA; Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Maximillian J. Muller, Esq., Muller Brazil, LLP, Philadelphia, PA, for petitioner.

Christine Becer, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Vowell, Chief Special Master:

On December 16, 2014, Michael Lerg filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2

[the 

“Vaccine Act” or “Program”]. Petitioner alleged that he suffered a shoulder injury which 

was caused by the meningococcal vaccine he received on May 6, 2014. Petition at 1. 

The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On May 29, 2015, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) report in which she indicates 

that she “has determined that petitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with a shoulder 

injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) and recommends that compensation be 

awarded in this case.” Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Respondent further agrees 

that petitioner’s injury lasted for more than six months and, “that petitioner’s injury is not 

due to factors unrelated to the administration of the meningococcal vaccine.” Id. at 3.

 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to 

post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 

note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to 

redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of 

privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such 

material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2006).
2

In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, I find that 

petitioner is entitled to compensation.

s/Denise K. Vowell

Denise K. Vowell

Chief Special Master