alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 23.78 What happens to confiscated wildlife and plants? ( a ) *Purpose.* Article VIII of the Treaty provides for confiscation or return to the country of export of specimens that are traded in violation of CITES.
( b ) *Disposal options.* Part 12 of this subchapter provides the options we have for disposing of forfeited and abandoned live and dead wildlife and plants. These include maintenance in captivity either in the United States or in the country of export, return to the wild under limited circumstances, and sale of certain Appendix-II or -III specimens. Under some conditions, euthanasia or destruction may be necessary. ( 1 ) We use a plant rescue center program to dispose of confiscated live plants. Participants in this program may also assist APHIS, CBP, and FWS Law Enforcement in holding seized specimens as evidence pending any legal decisions.
( 2 ) We dispose of confiscated live wildlife on a case-by-case basis at the time of seizure and forfeiture, and consider the quantity, protection level, and husbandry needs of the wildlife.
( c ) *Re-export.* We may issue a re-export certificate for a CITES specimen that was forfeited or abandoned when the certificate indicates the specimen was confiscated and when the re-export meets one of the following purposes: ( 1 ) For any CITES species, the return of a live specimen to the Management Authority of the country of export, placement of a live specimen in a rescue center, or use of the specimen for law enforcement, judicial, or forensic purposes.
( 2 ) For an Appendix-II or -III species, the disposal of the specimen in an appropriate manner that benefits enforcement and administration of the Convention.
( d ) *Consultation process.* FWS and APHIS may consult with the Management Authority in the country of export or re-export and other relevant governmental and nongovernmental experts before making a decision on the disposal of confiscated live specimens that have been forfeited or abandoned to the FWS, APHIS, or CBP.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM YEAR END
1996 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           4,286
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,016
<ALLOWANCES>                                       506
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,012
<PP&E>                                         135,396
<DEPRECIATION>                                  45,759
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 117,463
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,729
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        64,482
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,450
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   117,463
<SALES>                                         79,024
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                79,024
<CGS>                                           63,860
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   74,548
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 223
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,879
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,757
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,122
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,122
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 17 (Thursday, January 26, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 4379]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-720]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--PXI Systems Alliance, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on January 6, 2006, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. 
has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney 
General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its 
membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Marek 
Micro, Sulzbach-Rosenberg, Germany; and 4DSP, Inc., Reno, NV have 
withdrawn as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. intends 
to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in 
membership.
    On November 22, 2000, PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. filed its original 
notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of 
Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 
6(b) of the Act on March 8, 2001 (66 FR 13971).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on October 11, 
2005. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on November 3, 2005 (70 FR 66851).

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 06-720 Filed 1-25-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE
PERIOD DECEMBER 31, 1995.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       2,024,584
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  969,993
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,994,577
<PP&E>                                      36,036,469
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,156,748
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,040,568
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          182,100
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  29,858,468
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,040,568
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,065,426
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,307,419
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,758,007
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Electronics For Imaging, Inc. (the Company), on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Report), I, Guy Gecht, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |                                  
|------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------
|                    |  |  |  | /S/    GUY
GECHT                 
|Date: March 2, 2009 |  |  |  | Guy Gecht,Chief Executive Officer

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Electronics For Imaging, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Report), I, John Ritchie, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |                                     
|------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------
|                    |  |  |  | /S/    JOHN
RITCHIE                 
|Date: March 2, 2009 |  |  |  | John Ritchie,Chief Financial Officer
§ 73.4180 Payment disclosure: Payola, plugola, kickbacks. ( a ) See 47 U.S.C. 507.
( b ) See Public Notice, FCC 70-593, dated June 4, 1970. 23 FCC 2d 588; 35 FR 9045, June 11, 1970.
( c ) See Public Notice, FCC 88-175, dated May 18, 1988.
[44 FR 36389, June 22, 1979, as amended at 49 FR 20504, May 15, 1984; 59 FR 52087, Oct. 14, 1994]
§ 217.317 Modifications of Letter of Authorization. ( a ) A LOA issued under §§ 216.106 and 217.316 of this section for the activities identified in § 217.310(c) shall be modified upon request by Sunrise Wind, provided that: ( 1 ) The specified activity and mitigation, monitoring, and reporting measures, as well as the anticipated impacts, are the same as those described and analyzed for this subpart (excluding changes made pursuant to the adaptive management provision in paragraph (c)(1) of this section); and
( 2 ) NMFS determines that the mitigation, monitoring, or reporting measures required by the previous LOA under this subpart were implemented.
( b ) For a LOA modification request by the applicant that includes changes to the activity or the mitigation, monitoring, or reporting measures (excluding changes made pursuant to the adaptive management provision in paragraph (c)(1) of this section), the LOA shall be modified, provided that: ( 1 ) NMFS determines that the changes to the activity or the mitigation, monitoring, or reporting do not change the findings made for the regulations in this subpart and do not result in more than a minor change in the total estimated number of takes (or distribution by species or years); and
( 2 ) NMFS may publish a notice of proposed modified LOA in the Federal Register, including the associated analysis of the change, and solicit public comment before issuing the LOA.
( c ) A LOA issued under § 216.106 of this chapter and § 217.316 for the activities identified in § 217.310(c) may be modified by NMFS under the circumstances in paragraphs (c)(1) and (2) of this section: ( 1 ) Through adaptive management, NMFS may modify (including remove, revise, or add to) the existing mitigation, monitoring, or reporting measures after consulting with Sunrise Wind regarding the practicability of the modifications, if doing so creates a reasonable likelihood of more effectively accomplishing the goals of the mitigation and monitoring measures set forth in this subpart. ( i ) Possible sources of data that could contribute to the decision to modify the mitigation, monitoring, or reporting measures in an LOA include, but are not limited to: ( A ) Results from Sunrise Wind's monitoring;
( B ) Results from other marine mammals and/or sound research or studies; and
( C ) Any information that reveals marine mammals may have been taken in a manner, extent, or number not authorized by this subpart or subsequent LOA.
( ii ) If, through adaptive management, the modifications to the mitigation, monitoring, or reporting measures are substantial, NMFS shall publish a notice of proposed LOA in the Federal Register and solicit public comment; and
( 2 ) If NMFS determines that an emergency exists that poses a significant risk to the well-being of the species or stocks of marine mammals specified in the LOA issued pursuant to § 216.106 of this chapter and § 217.316, a LOA may be modified without prior notice or opportunity for public comment. Notice would be published in the Federal Register within 30 days of the action.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Hans Boge the Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer ofKlondike Star Mineral Corporation, Inc. (the "Company") in compliance with 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, hereby certify that, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSBfor the period ended November 12, 2006, fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company. 

  

|   | *Date: January 12, 2007_* | *Signed:* |                                    |
|--------|---------------------------|-----------|-----------------------------------------|
|   |                      |      |                                    |
|   |                      | *Name:*   | *Hans Boge*                             |
|   |                      | *Title:*  | *Chief Executive Officer and principal* |
|   |                      |      | *financial officer*                     |
#### § 90.1201 Scope.

This subpart sets out the regulations governing use of the 4940-4990 MHz (4.9 GHz) band. It includes eligibility requirements, and specific operational and technical standards for stations licensed in this band. The rules in this subpart are to be read in conjunction with the applicable requirements contained elsewhere in this part; however, in case of conflict, the provisions of this subpart shall govern with respect to licensing and operation in this band.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 By The Chief Financial Officer,

As Adopted
Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002.

I, F. Clay Creasey, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of Toys R Us, Inc. (the
Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended February 3, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ F. Clay Creasey, Jr.                                               
|F. Clay Creasey, Jr. Executive Vice President - Chief Financial Officer
|(Principal Financial Officer)                                          
|May 15, 2007
# Map            Ethnic groups in Afghanistan.
#### Paul Peterson, appellant, v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company, appellee.

Filed March 28, 1913.

No. 17,044.

Judgment: Pleading and Prooe. A judgment granting relief outside of the pleadings and evidence is erroneous.

Appeal from the district court for Washington county: William A. Redick, Judge.

*Reversed.*

*Jefferis & Howell*and *Hermwn, Aye,*for appellant.

*Greene, Breclcenridge, Gurley & Wood-rough, contra.*

Rose, J.

This is an action to recover fire insurance under a contract of compromise and settlement fixing the loss at *449$711.11. For the term of one year from March 23, 1909, defendant insured plaintiff against loss by fire to the extent of $1,000 pn a linotype and $200 on a steretoyping plant, and authorized concurrent insurance, which was written in the Springfield Fire *&*Marine Insurance Company to the extent of $1,300 on the linotype and $200 on the stereotyping plant. The building containing the property was destroyed by fire April 27, 1909. Plaintiff pleaded a compromise and settlement of defendant’s'proportion of the loss at $711.11. In its answer defendant denied the compromise and settlement, and pleaded the following defenses: (1) Plaintiff was not the sole owner of the property at the time of the fire, and for that reason was not entitled to any indemnity under the terms of his policy. (2) In violation of his insurance contract, lie made false statements in his proof of loss and thus invalidated his insurance. The case was tried to the court without a jury. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff for $240.12 only, he has appealed.

This case was decided on the identical evidence considered in *Springfield Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Peterson, ante,*p. 446, and for the reasons therein stated the result here must be the same.

The judgment granting relief to defendant, being outside of the issues and evidence, is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed.
Hillsborough

No. 82-022

#### Burton L. Bruce *& a.*v. City of Nashua *& a.*

June 9, 1982

*Prunier, Mazerolle & Frasca P.A.,*of Nashua *(Jeffrey H. Mazerolle*on the brief), by brief for intervenors Dennis H. Raymond and Thomas F. Monahan.

*Burton L. Bruce & a.*waived brief.

Memorandum Opinion

This is an appeal from a decision of a Master *(Theodore Wadleigh,*Esq.) upholding the granting of a lot frontage variance in Nashua. After the master’s report was approved, by the Superior Court *{Goode,*J.), the intervenor land owners appealed, asserting that the master imposed an improper condition on the variance. We have no record of the proceedings below; thus our review of the master’s decision is restricted. *See L & R Rentals v. Judge,*122 N.H. 327, 328, 444 A.2d 542, 543 (1982); *Gordon v. Tafe,*121 N.H. 250, 252, 428 A.2d 892, 894 (1981). We find no error on the record before us.

*Affirmed.*
###### Editorial Note on Part 300

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 300 appear at 64 FR 44431, Aug. 16, 1999, and at 76 FR 59305, Sept. 26, 2011.

#### § 300.301 Definitions.

In addition to the terms defined in § 300.2, the terms used in this subpart have the following meanings.

*Landing* means to begin to offload fish, or to offload fish from any vessel.

*Listed IUU Vessel* means a vessel that is included on a final IUU vessel list adopted or approved by an RFMO to which the United States is a party.

*Processing* means the preparation or packaging of fish to render it suitable for human consumption, retail sale, industrial uses or long-term storage, including, but not limited to, cooking, canning, smoking, salting, drying, filleting, freezing, or rendering into meal or oil.

*Transshipping* means the offloading, unloading, or transferring of fish or fish products from one vessel to another.
Z S t



# £ ¤ 2 4 S T o l e d o S t



## E

l m S t

C

R

- 6 

## X S

t P

i n e S t



## W 2 n d S t W 3 r d S t



## M o n r o

e S t



## W C h

e

s t

n u t S t H a r r i s o n A v e



## O

r e

g

o

n G u

l c

h R d 

## E 3 r d S t



# B r

o o k l y n C i r E 2 n d S t

S P

i n e S t

O r o

T r l O a k S t P

l u m

S t

S S p r u c e S t S p
r u c e S t 

## W 4 t

h S t

O r e g o n T r l 

## E 2 n d S t

! (

C a l i f o r n i a G u l c h C o l o r a d o M

a p

D

a

t e : F e b r u a r y 1 3

, 2 0 1 3

M a p P r o j e c t i o n : U T M

, M e t e r s
, 1 3 N o r t h

, N A D 8 3

D a t a S o u r c e s :

O

p e r a b l e U n i t B o u n d a r y

- U

. S

. E P A R e g i o n 8 ( 2 0 1 3 )

W

a s t

e R o c k P i l e

- M F G

, I n c

. ( 2 0 0 9 )

S t r e e t s

- N a v t e q ( 2 0 1 1 )

I m a g e r y

- B i n g ( 2 0 1 3 )

* B o u n d a r i e s a r e b a s e d o n t h e n a t u r e a n d e x t e n t o f c o n t a m i n a t i o n

a n d a r e s u b j e c t t o c h a n g e

.



# C a l i f o r n i a G u l c h S u p e r f u n d S i t e

O p e r a b l e U n i t 7

A p a c h e T a i l i n g s



# £ 0 2 0 0 4 0 0 F e e t

0 5 0 1 0 0 M e t e r s 

## O U 7

W a s t e R o c k P i l e

H i g h w a y s
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-0917

_____________________________

RICHARD A. OLIVER,

Appellant,

v.

MELINDA E. OLIVER,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.

William F. Stone, Judge.

December 28, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

KELSEY, M.K. THOMAS, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Richard A. Oliver, pro se, Appellant.

Aaron B. Wentz and Kelly A. Simon of Aaron B. Wentz, P.A., Fort 

Walton Beach, for Appellee.
No. 11-5704.

#### Swain *v.*Fullenkamp et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) I, Randy K. Ferrell, as thePresident and Chief Executive Officer of Fauquier Bankshares, Inc., certify that, to the best of myknowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, whichaccompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of FauquierBankshares, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is madepursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied uponfor any other purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to update the foregoingcertification except as required by law.        Dated: May 9, 2008  /s/ Randy K. Ferrell    Randy K. Ferrell    President & Chief Executive Officer   
35