alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Rules, Procedures, & Forms - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"XXJUJ1yNnY\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/rules-procedures-forms\/\">Rules, Procedures, & Forms<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/rules-procedures-forms\/embed\/#?secret=XXJUJ1yNnY\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Rules, Procedures, & Forms” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"XXJUJ1yNnY\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Information relating to Federal Circuit rules, procedures, and forms can be found on these pages. Court Forms Federal & Local Rules of Appellate Procedure Internal Operating Procedures Rules of Practice Amendments Rule of Practice Archives"}
About this capture
Stanford University, Social Sciences Resource Group
http://ssrc.stanford.edu
Fugitive US Agencies
Name

(Last, First, Middle) Title Company/ Organization Street Address Phone 

Webinar Attendees: The Manufactured Housing Working Group Meeting

City Fax State/ Prov Zip

Meeting Date: 8/4/2014

Manager of FederalGovernment Affairs

ASHRAE 1828 L Street N.W., Suite 

#810

Ames, Mark Washington DC 20036 202-833-1830 202‐833‐0

Energy Analyst New West Technologies, LLC 1000 Independence Ave, 

SW

Freeman, Jeremiah Washington DC 20585 N/A N/AKessler, Bert N/A N/A 15301 Spectrum Dr Addison TX 75001 N/A N/A 

Building Science Specialist Washington State University

Extension Energy Program

925 Plum Street SE 

Building 3

Lubliner, Michael Olympia WA 98504 360-956-2082 360‐236‐20Mendon, Vrushali N/A N/A 902 Battelle Blvd. Richland WA 9935 N/A N/A 

N/A CertainTeed Corporation 750 East Swedesford 

Road

Ponder, Thomas Valley Forge PA 19482 N/A N/A

Director, Res. Product

Management

Rocky, Brian Johnson Controls, Inc. 3110 N. Mead Street Wichita KS 67219 316-832-6431 316‐832‐65

N/A Goodman Manufacturing

Company, L.P.

5151 San Felipe Street, 

Suite 500

Roy, Aniruddh Houston TX 77056 N/A N/ARoy, Anthony N/A N/A 623 SW Oak Portland OR 97204 N/A N/A Schneider, Peter N/A Efficiency Vermont/VEIC 128 Lakeside Ave Burlington VT 05401 N/A N/A 

Program Manager, Energy

Efficiency

National Association of Home

Builders (NAHB)

Surrena, Don 1201 15th Street, NW Washington DC 20005 202-266-8574 N/A Wade, Michael N/A Cavalier Homes 144 Corporate Way Addison AL 35540 N/A N/A 

08/19/2014 11:31:21 
Name

(Last, First, Middle) Title Company/ Organization Street Address Phone 

Webinar Attendees: The Manufactured Housing Working Group Meeting

City Fax State/ Prov Zip

Meeting Date: 8/4/2014

Vice President, Standards Air‐Conditioning, Heating &

Refrigeration Institute (AHRI)

2111 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 500

Woodford, Michael W. Arlington VA 22201 703-600-0328 703‐528‐38

Contacts Included: 13 

08/19/2014 11:31:22
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00295-CR

Mohamed Ibrahim Daud

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 371st District Court

of Tarrant County (1332770D)

July 2, 2015

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
§ 95.1779 GMRS unwanted emissions limits. Each GMRS transmitter type must be designed to comply with the applicable unwanted emissions limits in this section. ( a ) *Emission masks.* Emission masks applicable to transmitting equipment in the GMRS are defined by the requirements in the following table. The numbers in the attenuation requirements column refer to rule paragraph numbers under paragraph (b) of this section. Emission types filter
Attenuation requirements A1D, A3E, F1D, G1D, F2D, F3E, G3E with audio filter
(1), (2), (7) A1D, A3E, F1D, G1D, F3E, G3E without audio filter
(3), (4), (7) H1D, J1D, R1D, H3E, J3E, R2E
(5), (6), (7)
( 1 ) Filtering noted for GMRS transmitters refers to the requirement in § 95.1775(e).
( 2 ) Unwanted emission power may be measured as either mean power or peak envelope power, provided that the transmitter output power is measured the same way.
( b ) *Attenuation requirements.* The power of unwanted emissions must be attenuated below the transmitter output power in Watts (P) by at least: ( 1 ) 25 dB (decibels) on any frequency removed from the center of the authorized bandwidth by more than 50% up to and including 100% of the authorized bandwidth.
( 2 ) 35 dB on any frequency removed from the center of the authorized bandwidth by more than 100% up to and including 250% of the authorized bandwidth.
( 3 ) 83 log (fd ÷ 5) dB on any frequency removed from the center of the authorized bandwidth by a displacement frequency (fd in kHz) of more than 5 kHz up to and including 10 kHz.
( 4 ) 116 log (fd ÷ 6.1) dB or 50 + 10 log (P) dB, whichever is the lesser attenuation, on any frequency removed from the center of the authorized bandwidth by a displacement frequency (fd in kHz), of more than 10 kHz up to and including 250% of the authorized bandwidth.
( 5 ) 25 dB on any frequency removed from the center of the authorized bandwidth by more than 50% up to and including 150% of the authorized bandwidth.
( 6 ) 35 dB on any frequency removed from the center of the authorized bandwidth by more than 150% up to and including 250% of the authorized bandwidth.
( 7 ) 43 + 10 log (P) dB on any frequency removed from the center of the authorized bandwidth by more than 250%.
( c ) *Measurement bandwidths.* The power of unwanted emissions in the frequency bands specified in paragraphs (b)(1) through (4) of this section is measured with a reference bandwidth of 300 Hz. The power of unwanted emissions in the frequency range specified in paragraph (b)(5) of this section is measured with a reference bandwidth of at least 30 kHz.
( d ) *Measurement conditions.* The requirements in this section apply to each GMRS transmitter type both with and without the connection of permitted attachments, such as an external speaker, microphone, power cord and/or antenna.
#### § 12.14 What happens if the required notification of seizure and proposed forfeiture is not provided?

Under 18 U.S.C. 983(a)(1)(F), if the Service or the Solicitor does not send notice of a seizure of property in accordance with that section to the person from whom the property was seized, and no extension of time was granted, the Government is required to return the property to that person, unless the property is contraband or other property that is illegal to possess. Any return of property under this section does not prejudice the right of the Government to commence a forfeiture proceeding at a later time.
Exhibit 10.21


    Exhibit
      10.21

     

    


     

    AMENDMENT
      No. 2 to

     

    LICENSE
      AGREEMENT

     

    Amendment
      No. 2 to License (this “Amendment”)
      made as
      of March 8, 2007, by and between Acuity
      Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a
      Delaware
      corporation, with its principal offices at 3701 Market Street, Philadelphia,
      PA,
      19104 (“Acuity”)
      and
      Pathogenics, Inc.,
      a
      Delaware Corporation with its principal offices at 99 Derby Street, Suite 200,
      Hingham, MA 02043 (“Pathogenics”).

     

    BACKGROUND

     

    WHEREAS,
      Acuity and Pathogenics entered into a License Agreement (the “License
      Agreement”)
      on
      April 13, 2006 which was amended on August 2, 2006;

     

    WHEREAS,
      Pathogenics and Acuity have agreed to enter into this Amendment to amend and
      restate section 4.7(a) to provide that Acuity will provide notice to Pathogenics
      of the achievement of a milestone within two (2) business days of the
      achievement of such milestone.

     

    NOW,
      THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants, agreements,
      representations and warranties hereinafter set forth, and intending to be
      legally bound, the Parties hereby agree as follows:

     

    
      	
            	1.	
              Section
                4.7(a) of the License Agreement shall be replaced with the following
                new
                Section 4.7(a):

            


    

     

    “(a)Acuity
      shall provide written notice to Pathogenics the satisfaction of such milestone
      trigger within two (2) business days of the achievement of each applicable
      milestone.”

     

    (Signature
      Page Follows)


    
      
         

      

      
         

        
          

        

      

      
         

      

    


    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF,
      the
      parties have caused this Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized
      representatives as of the day and year first indicated above.

     

    

      
        	 	
                ACUITY
                  PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

              
	 	 
	 	 
	 	
                By:_________________________________

              
	 	
                Name:
                  Dale R. Pfost

              
	 	
                Title:
                  President and Chief Executive Officer

              
	 	 
	 	 
	 	
                PATHOGENICS,
                  INC.

              
	 	 
	 	 
	 	
                By:_________________________________

              
	 	
                Name:
                  Frederic P. Zotos

              
	 	
                Title:
                  President and Chief Executive
                  Officer
§ 219.34 Prohibitions. Except for takings contemplated in § 219.33 and authorized by a LOA issued under §§ 216.106 of this chapter and 219.37, it shall be unlawful for any person to do any of the following in connection with the activities described in § 219.31: ( a ) Violate, or fail to comply with, the terms, conditions, and requirements of this subpart or a LOA issued under §§ 216.106 of this chapter and 219.37;
( b ) Take any marine mammal not specified in such LOA;
( c ) Take any marine mammal specified in such LOA in any manner other than as specified;
( d ) Take a marine mammal specified in such LOA if NMFS determines such taking results in more than a negligible impact on the species or stocks of such marine mammal; or
( e ) Take a marine mammal specified in such LOA if NMFS determines such taking results in an unmitigable adverse impact on the species or stock of such marine mammal for taking for subsistence uses.
#### OVERHOLSER v. GORDON.

No. 10238.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued *Nov.*7, 1950.

Decided Jan. 25, 1951.

Mr. Joseph A. Sommer, Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. George Morris Fay, U. S. Atty., and Ross O’Donoghue and Joseph M. Howard, Asst. U. S. Attys., all of Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellant. Mr. L. Clark Ewing, Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., also entered an appearance for appellant.

Mr. I. Irwin Bolotin, Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, PROCT.OR, and BAZELON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from an order of the District Court sitting as a Probate Court directing the Superintendent of Saint Eliz-abeths Hospital to pay $3,817 to the administrator of the estate of a deceased patient, for the sole purpose of paying a claim of the District of Columbia to recover money the District had paid the Hospital for the patient’s support. The Superintendent had received the amount in suit from the Veteran’s Administration as a pension to which the patient was entitled, and had held it in the patient’s pension account.

A statute requires the hospital to apply the unexpended balance of a deceased patient’s pension money "to the general uses of said hospital”. 35 Stat. 593, 24 U.S.C.A. § 165. Moreover, the United States has not consented to be sued. But we need not consider those points, for the Probate Court “has no jurisdiction to decide a dispute regarding the title or the right of possession of personal property.” Jones v. Dunlap, *73*App.D.C. 59, 115 F.2d 689. Holzbeierlein v. Grant, 73 App.D.C. 154, 117 F.2d 26. The judgment must therefore be reversed for want of jurisdiction.

Reversed.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO**
I, William C. Ulland, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of IKONICS Corporation; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.        Date:  May 12, 2005 /s/ William C. Ulland   William C. Ulland   Chairman, Chief Executive Officerand President
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b)


OF
SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Gregory L.
Cauthen, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Transocean Inc., a
Cayman Islands company (the “Company”), hereby certify, to my knowledge,
that:





(1)
            the
      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
      2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and





(2)
            information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.





Dated:     May
      7, 2008
            
            /s/ Gregory L. CauthenName:
            Gregory
      L. CauthenSenior
      Vice President andChief
      Financial Officer





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or
as a separate disclosure document.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Transocean Inc. and will be retained by Transocean Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 217.36 Letters of Authorization. ( a ) To incidentally take marine mammals pursuant to this subpart, Hilcorp must apply for and obtain an LOA.
( b ) An LOA, unless suspended or revoked, may be effective for a period of time not to exceed the expiration date of this subpart.
( c ) If an LOA expires prior to the expiration date of this subpart, Hilcorp may apply for and obtain a renewal of the LOA.
( d ) In the event of projected changes to the activity or to mitigation and monitoring measures required by an LOA, Hilcorp must apply for and obtain a modification of the LOA as described in § 217.37.
( e ) The LOA shall set forth: ( 1 ) Permissible methods of incidental taking;
( 2 ) Means of effecting the least practicable adverse impact (*i.e.,* mitigation) on the species, its habitat, and on the availability of the species for subsistence uses; and
( 3 ) Requirements for monitoring and reporting.
( f ) Issuance of the LOA shall be based on a determination that the level of taking will be consistent with the findings made for the total taking allowable under this subpart.
( g ) Notice of issuance or denial of an LOA shall be published in the Federal Register within thirty days of a determination.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors

Lighting Science Group Corporation: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-172466, 333-172461, 333-171726 and 333-150628) on Form S-8 of Lighting Science Group Corporation of our report datedApril 16, 2012, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Lighting Science Group Corporation as of December 31, 2011 and the related consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity (deficit), cash flowsfor the year ended December 31, 2011, which report appears in the December 31, 2011 annual report on Form 10-K/A of Lighting Science Group Corporation. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Orlando, Florida 

April 30, 2012 

Certified Public Accountants
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 20 October 2004         

on the aid scheme ‘Invest Northern Ireland Venture 2003’ which the United Kingdom is planning to implement for SMEs in Northern Ireland

(notified under document number C(2004) 3917)

(Only the English text is authentic)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2005/644/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 88(2) thereof,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, and in particular Article 62(1)(a) thereof,

Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to those provisions (1) and having regard to their comments,

Whereas:

I.   PROCEDURE

II.   DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE MEASURE

1.   Objective of the measure

2.   Description of the measure

Legal basis of the scheme

Budget of the scheme

Duration of the scheme

Beneficiaries of the scheme

Size of investments

Cumulation of aid under the scheme

Grounds for initiating the procedure

III.   COMMENTS FROM INTERESTED PARTIES

IV.   COMMENTS FROM THE UNITED KINGDOM

V.   ASSESSMENT OF THE MEASURE

1.   Legality

2.   Existence of State aid

3.   Evidence of market failure

4.   Compatibility of the measure

VI.   CONCLUSION

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The State aid which the United Kingdom is planning to implement under the Invest Northern Ireland Venture 2003 scheme is compatible with the common market within the meaning of Article 87(3)(c) of the Treaty. Implementation of the aid is accordingly authorised.

Article 2

The United Kingdom shall submit an annual report on the implementation of the aid.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Done at Brussels, 20 October 2004.

For the Commission

Mario MONTI            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ C 33, 6.2.2004, p. 2.

(2)  See footnote 1.

(3)  The definition of small and medium-sized enterprises applied by the United Kingdom authorities for the purposes of the scheme is always in line with the definition given in Annex I to Commission Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises (OJ L 10, 13.1.2001, p. 33). Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 364/2004 (OJ L 63, 28.2.2004, p. 22).

(4)  State Aid N 620/2002 — United Kingdom: ‘Small and Medium Enterprises Venture Capital and Loan Fund’. Commission Decision of 4 February 2003 (C/2003/110).

(5)  State Aid N 265/2000 — United Kingdom: ‘Regional Aid Map 2000-2006’ (OJ C 272, 23.9.2000, p. 43).

(6)OJ C 235, 21.8.2001, p. 3.

(7)              ‘Market Failure in the Supply of Venture Capital Funds for SMEs in Northern Ireland’. Invest NI, October 2002.

----