alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5211

To amend the Clean Air Act to repeal certain emissions standards for motor

vehicles which have not yet taken effect.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 6, 1994

Mr. DELAY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Clean Air Act to repeal certain emissions

standards for motor vehicles which have not yet taken effect.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF CERTAIN MOTOR VEHICLE EMIS4 SION STANDARDS.

5 Section 202 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401

6 and following) is amended as follows:

7 (1) Subsection (a)(1) is amended by adding at

8 the end thereof the following: ‘‘For all motor vehicles

9 in any class or category manufactured after the

10 model year 1995, the standard promulgated by the
2

•HR 5211 IH

1 Administrator under this section shall be the stand2 ard applicable to such class or category of motor ve3 hicle in the model year 1995.’’.

4 (2) Subsection (a)(3)(B)(ii) is repealed.

5 (3) Subsection (h) is repealed.

6 (4) Subsection (i) is repealed.

Æ
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4873

To provide authority to executive departments and agencies to issue rulings

respecting application of laws under their jurisdiction.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 1, 1994

Mr. MCHALE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To provide authority to executive departments and agencies

to issue rulings respecting application of laws under their

jurisdiction.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Regulatory Compliance

5 Assistance Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. RULINGS.

7 Section 301 of title 5, United States Code, is amend8 ed—

9 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a)’’ before ‘‘The head’’,

10 (2) by adding at the end the following:
2

•HR 4873 IH

1 ‘‘(b)(1) The head of each executive department and

2 executive agency may, upon request, issue a ruling to any

3 individual or entity respecting the application of the laws

4 under the jurisdiction of such department or agency to

5 such individual or entity on the basis of information pro6 vided by such individual or entity.

7 ‘‘(2)(A) The head of an executive department or exec8 utive agency shall establish a program requiring the pay9 ment of user fees for requests to the department or agency

10 for a ruling under paragraph (1).

11 ‘‘(B) The program established under subparagraph

12 (A) shall require that the amount of the fee charged shall

13 be determined after taking into account the average time

14 for, and difficulty of, complying with requests for rulings

15 and shall be payable in advance. The program shall pro16 vide for such exemptions and reduced fees under the pro17 gram as the head of the executive department or executive

18 agency determines to be appropriate.’’,

19 (3) by inserting at the end of the section head20 ing ‘‘and rulings’’, and

21 (4) in the item relating to section 301 in the

22 table of sections, by inserting at the end of the item

23 ‘‘and rulings’’.

Æ
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 22 June 2005         

relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 82 of the EC Treaty and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement

(Case COMP/A.39.116/B2 — Coca-Cola)

(notified under document number C(2005) 1829)

(Only the English text is authentic)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2005/670/EC)

(1)   

This decision adopted pursuant to Article 9(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (1) is addressed to the Coca-Cola Company (TCCC) and its three major bottlers, Bottling Holdings (Luxembourg) SARL, Coca-Cola Erfrischungsgetränke AG and Coca-Cola Hellenic Bottling Company SA (hereafter: the Parties). The subject matter of the procedure relates to the conduct of TCCC and its bottlers in the supply of carbonated soft drinks in both the distribution channel for consumption at home and the channel for consumption on premise in the EC Member States, Iceland and Norway. In a preliminary assessment, the Commission expressed concerns under Article 82 of the EC Treaty and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement in relation to practices consisting in exclusivity-related requirements, growth and target rebates and leveraging of market power between various product categories.

(2)   

The Commission considers that the commitments offered following the preliminary assessment and the observations submitted by interested third parties are sufficient to address the identified competition concerns in channels, where the Parties reach defined market share thresholds. In particular, the Parties will refrain from concluding exclusivity agreements save in specific circumstances and from granting growth and target rebates. In the preliminary assessment these practices were considered to make it more difficult for third parties to compete on the merits. By providing that requirements concerning assortment and shelf-space must be defined separately for certain categories of brands, the commitments address the concern identified in the preliminary assessment that strong brands could be leveraged in favour of weaker brands. In regard to financing and technical equipment, the commitments reduce contract duration, give customers the option of repayment and termination without penalties and free up a certain share of cooler space, thus addressing the concerns that the pre-existing arrangements would unduly bind customers and lead to outlet exclusivity.

(3)   

The decision finds that, in view of the commitments, there are no longer grounds for action by the Commission. The decision shall be binding until 31 December 2010.

(4)   

The Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Dominant Positions issued a favourable opinion on 20 May 2005.

----

(1)OJ L 1, 4.1.2003, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 411/2004 (OJ L 68, 6.3.2004, p. 1).

----
#### § 217.92 Permissible methods of taking.

Under LOAs issued pursuant to § 216.106 of this chapter and § 217.96, the Holder of the LOAs (hereinafter “Navy”) may incidentally, but not intentionally, take marine mammals within the area described in § 217.90(b) by Level A harassment and Level B harassment associated with in-water pile driving and pile removal activities, provided the activity is in compliance with all terms, conditions, and requirements of the regulations in this subpart and the applicable LOAs.
**Read more of the November Dispatch** Drexel University Campus Cops Cook Up a Unique Way to Serve Their Community
	  De-escalation for Veterans Training Now Available
        The Veterans Compendium Project
          Women Leading the Way in Tribal Law Enforcement
          The Elder Justice Network Locator Map
		  The L. Anthony Sutin Award for Innovative Law Enforcement and Community Partnerships is Now Open
##### 



(i)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Partnership.
  By:
    /s/ Dennis J. TietzDennis J. Tietz,President and Chief Executive Officer of
Cronos Capital Corp.,
General Partner of the Partnership/s/ John KallasJohn Kallas,Chief Financial Officer of
Cronos Capital Corp,.
General Partner of the Partnership  
 *
    
    This certification, required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, other than as
required by Section 906, shall not be deemed to be filed with the Commission or subject to
the rules and regulations promulgated by the Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of said Act.
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority (the Authority), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge,
on the date hereof:



|(a) | this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Authority for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Authority.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/    MITCHELL GROSSINGER
ETESSMitchell Grossinger EtessChief Executive Officer, Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority
December 29, 2010


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Authority and will be retained by the Authority and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Election Assistance Commission

# AGENCY:

United States Election Assistance Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice of Public Meeting. 

# Date and Time:

Thursday, September 21, 2006, 9:30 a.m.-3:30 p.m. (CDT).

# Place:

University of Missouri—St. Louis, Millennium Center, One University Boulevard, St. Louis, MO 63121-4400, (314) 516-5000.

# Agenda:

*The Commission will receive presentations on the following topics:*                         voter information access portals and military and overseas voting. The Commission will consider other administrative matters.                    

This meeting will be open to the public.

# PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:

Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (202) 566-3100.

Thomas R. Wilkey,

Executive Director, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

[FR Doc. 06-7448 Filed 8-31-06; 12:55 pm]

BILLING CODE 6820-KF-M
#### § 23.19 What CITES documents are required to export Appendix-I plants?

Answer the questions in the following decision tree to find the section in this part that applies to the type of CITES document you need to export Appendix-I plants. See [§ 23.20(d)](/on/2024-09-20/title-50/section-23.20#p-23.20(d)) for CITES exemption documents or [§ 23.92](/on/2024-09-20/title-50/section-23.92) for specimens that are exempt from the requirements of CITES and do not need CITES documents.

[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER27MY14.001/ER27MY14.001_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER27MY14.001/ER27MY14.001_original_size.png)

[[72 FR 48448](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/72-FR-48448), Aug. 23, 2007, as amended at [79 FR 30420](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/79-FR-30420), May 27, 2014]
Please wait... 

 

If this message is not eventually replaced by the proper contents of the document, your PDF 

viewer may not be able to display this type of document. 

 

You can upgrade to the latest version of Adobe Reader for Windows®, Mac, or Linux® by 

visiting http://www.adobe.com/go/reader_download. 

 

For more assistance with Adobe Reader visit http://www.adobe.com/go/acrreader. 

 

Windows is either a registered trademark or a trademark of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries. Mac is a trademark 

of Apple Inc., registered in the United States and other countries. Linux is the registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the U.S. and other 

countries.

Case 16-24295 Doc 80-1 Filed 08/29/18 Entered 08/29/18 14:51:57 Desc Proposed

 Order Page 1 of 1
USDANEWS                                                           VOLUME 58 NO. 7 —September 1999
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Defense Acquisition University.

# ACTION:

Board of Visitors meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The next meeting of the Defense Acquisition University (DAU) Board of Visitors (BoV) will be held at Defense Acquisition University, Fort Belvoir, VA. The purpose of this meeting is to report back to the BoV on continuing items of interest.

# DATES:

September 27, 2006 from 0900-1500.

# ADDRESSES:

Packard Conference Center, Defense Acquisition University, Bldg. 184, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Patricia Cizmadia at 703-805-5134.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public; however, because of space limitations, allocation of seating will be made on a first-come, first severed bsis. Persons desiring to attend the meeting should call Ms. Patricia Cizmadia at 703-805-5134.

Dated: September 12, 2006.

L.M. Bynum, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, DoD.

[FR Doc. 06-7724  Filed 9-15-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
Cheshire,

No. 4670.

#### Mary W. Tracy *v.*Surry.

Argued November 5, 1958.

Decided November 28, 1958.

*440
      *Faulkner, Plaut & Hanna {Mr. Hanna*orally), for the plaintiff.

*Howard B. Lane*for the defendant.

*Homer S. Bradley*for the town of Surry, furnished no brief.

Blandin, J.

Since there is no claim of fraud, the first issue which we shall consider is whether the commissioners made a “gross mistake” within the meaning of RSA 234:39 in their determination that a public need existed for the establishment of the road. *Underwood*v. *Bailey,*59 N. H. 480; *Thompson*v. *Company, 78*N. H. 433, 436. Without detailing the evidence, it appears there was testimony that the road would be of value in fire fighting, that it would be used by the selectmen in getting to the property for the purpose of assessing it, that the power company would use it in reaching their lines, and that persons wishing to get out timber on property remote from the road would also find it both convenient and necessary. There was substantial evidence that the proposed road was the only practical route to this section of the area. In addition to this, the selectmen and the county commissioners took a view which may have furnished a vital part of the evidence. *Gelinas*v. *Portsmouth,*97 N. H. 248, 251, and cases cited. True, there was sharply conflicting testimony, but the contradictions and the weight of the evidence were for the “sole determination” of the commissioners in the absence of fraud or gross mistake. *Waisman*v. *Manchester,*96 N. H. 50, 56.

To overturn the commissioners’ findings, it is not enough that this court might have reached a different result. See *Sinkevich*v. *Nashua,*97 N. H. 262, 265. Considering the record as a whole, we cannot say that the commissioners made a gross mistake in reaching the conclusion that a public need or occasion for the way existed. *Jones*v. *Mason, 78*N. H. 148, 149. It follows the plaintiff’s exception to the finding that there was occasion for laying *441out the road is overruled. *Waisman*v. *Manchester, supra; Opinion of the Justices,*98 N. H. 533.

In regard to the plaintiff’s appeal on the issue of damages we are confronted with the familiar question of whether the finding was such as no reasonable person could make. In the light of the record as a whole, including the fact that the selectmen and county commissioners each took a view of the disputed premises, we cannot say that the finding was clearly unreasonable or that there was error in the Trial Court’s acceptance of the report. It follows the order is

*Exceptions overruled.*

All concurred.
Case 16-25209 Doc 5 Filed 08/05/16 Entered 08/05/16 11:20:55 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-25209 Doc 5 Filed 08/05/16 Entered 08/05/16 11:20:55 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 23 , 2014

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 14

- 00627

- CV

DELLA GOINES , Appellant

V.
SRMOF 2009

- I TRUST, BY WELLS FA RGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION NOT IN I TS INDIVIDUAL OR BAN KING CAPACITY BUT SOLEY AS CERTIFICATE TRUSTEE OF THE TRUST , Appellee s

On Appeal from the Co Civil Ct at Law No 4 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1046038

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is from a judgment signed July 23 , 2014. On September 25, 2014, this court found the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant’s request to proceed without the payment of costs. Appellant was ordered to pay the appellate filing fee and make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s

re cord on or before October 10, 2014, or the appeal would be dismissed.2 As of this date, a ppellant has not paid the appellate filing fee and has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record. Accordingly, the appeal
is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices McCally, Brown and Wise

.
Exhibit 32.1
                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Enxnet, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Quarterly Report"), We, Ryan Corley, President and Director and
Stephen Hoelscher, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.


Date: 02/10/2005                       /s/Ryan Corley
                                      Ryan Corley
                                      President and director


Date: 02/10/2005                       /s/Stephen Hoelscher
                                      Stephen Hoelscher
                                      CFO and Treasurer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

  CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zap.Com Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Avram A. Glazer,
as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 to the best of my knowledge, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a or
            15d of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Avram A. Glazer
------------------------
Avram A. Glazer
President and Chief Executive Officer
August 8, 2005

This Certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
amendment to the Quarterly report of China Evergreen Environmental Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Chong Liang Pu and Peh Chung Lim, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                 |  |                                      
|---------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|January 13, 2006 |  | /s/ Chong Liang Pu                   
|                 |  | Chong Liang Pu,                      
|                 |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                 | 
|                 |  | /s/ Peh Chung LimPeh Chung Lim       
|                 |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### § 10.3 Other applicable laws.

No statute or regulation of any State shall be construed to relieve a person from the restrictions, conditions, and requirements contained in this subchapter B. In addition, nothing in this subchapter B, nor any permit issued under this subchapter B, shall be construed to relieve a person from any other requirements imposed by a statute or regulation of any State or of the United States, including any applicable health, quarantine, agricultural, or customs laws or regulations, or other Service enforced statutes or regulations.