alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Darin P.McAreavey, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary andTreasurer, certify that:

1.     I havereviewed this amendment to the annual report on Form 10-K ofStellent, Inc.;

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for,the periods presented in this report.

|                     | /s/ DARIN P. MCAREAVEY                                                        |
|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     | Darin P. McAreavey                                                            |
| * *                 | *Executive  Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer* |
| Date: June 21, 2006 |                                                                          |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the quarterly  report of Source Direct  Holdings,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),  each of the undersigned,  in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.


Dated:  May 18, 2005                          /s/ Deren Z. Smith
                                              ------------------------------
                                              Name:  Deren Z. Smith
                                              Title: Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  May 18, 2005                          /s/ Kevin Arave
                                              ------------------------------
                                              Name:  Kevin Arave
                                              Title: Chief Financial Officer
§ 23.32 How do I apply for a U.S. CITES document? ( a ) To apply for a U.S. CITES document, you must complete a standard application form and submit it to the appropriate office shown on the top of the form.
( b ) To determine the type of CITES document needed for your shipment, go to §§ 23.18 through 23.20 for further guidance.
( c ) If a species is also regulated under another part of this subchapter (such as endangered or threatened species, see § 23.3), the requirements of all parts must be met. You may submit a single application that contains all the information needed to meet the requirements of CITES and other applicable parts.
( d ) You must also follow the general permit procedures in part 13 of this subchapter.
( e ) You should review the criteria in all applicable regulations in this subchapter that apply to the type of permit you are seeking before completing the application form.
( f ) We will review your application to assess whether it contains the information needed to make the required findings. ( 1 ) Based on available information, we will decide if any of the exemptions apply and what type of CITES document you need.
( 2 ) If we need additional information, we will contact you. If you do not provide the information within 45 calendar days, we will abandon your application. If your application is abandoned and you wish to apply for a permit at a later time, you must submit a new application.
Número Identificador

SEN2024________________

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO

TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES

PANEL IV

SUCN. FAUSTINO APONTE 

TORRES

Parte Apelante 

v.

SUCN. SILVERIO CRUZ 

BELTRÁN

Parte Apelada

KLAN202400397

Apelación

procedente del 

Tribunal de 

Primera 

Instancia, Sala 

Superior de

Humacao

Civil Núm.:

HSCI201101233

Sobre:

Servidumbre de 

paso

Panel integrado por su presidenta, la Jueza Cintrón Cintrón, la 

Jueza Rivera Marchand y el Juez Rodríguez Flores.

SENTENCIA

En San Juan, Puerto Rico, a 30 de abril de 2024.

Atendida la Moción Desistimiento sin Perjuicio presentada el 29 

de abril de 2024, por la parte apelante, se declara la misma ha lugar, 

a tenor con la Regla 83(A) del Reglamento del Tribunal de 

Apelaciones, 4 LPRA XXII-B, R. 83(A). Por tanto, se ordena el archivo 

definitivo de esta causa.

Notifíquese.

Lo acuerda y manda el Tribunal, y lo certifica la Secretaria del 

Tribunal de Apelaciones.

 Lcda. Lilia M. Oquendo Solís

 Secretaria del Tribunal de Apelaciones
# We Welcome 14 New JPME II Students to the iCollege

/ Published Aug. 3, 2015
JPME Phase II curriculum will begin producing national security leaders and advisors who develop the strategies and the necessary doctrine to successfully leverage cyber and information operations within the broader national security framework. The NDU iCollege’s JPME curriculum focuses on the information/cyberspace instrument of national security. It provides graduate-level education to senior military and civilian leaders with an emphasis on the military, governmental, and private sector dimensions of cyberspace as a critical component of national security strategy. The iCollege program concentrates on developing the habits of mind, conceptual foundations, and cognitive faculties graduates will need at their highest level of strategic responsibility. 
Selection for this program is highly competitive and is done through a potential student's Senior Service College (SSC) selection process. Students must be in the grade of O-5 and O-6 who have already received credit for completing a CJCS-accredited program of JPME Phase I or received equivalent JPME Phase I credit as articulated in CJCSI 1800.01E. Civilian students must be equivalent to GS-15 and SES-1. The desired mix of seminar students includes military officers from all three Military Departments, the U.S. Coast Guard, international officers, DoD civilians, Federal Agency civilians, and the private sector. The curriculum is designed for students who currently serve in, have an interest in, or may have the need to develop strategy with those who serve in the information/cyberspace domain. A successful student does not need technical expertise, but must possess the intellectual curiosity that makes them receptive to new ideas and new approaches to understanding national security.

Questions should be directed to the iCollege Cyber Leadership & Joint Education Department at   carl.horn2@ndu.edu .
EXHIBIT 10.1


 


SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT


 


Goldenwell Biotech, Inc.


 


The undersigned (the “Subscriber”)
hereby irrevocably subscribes for that number of shares of common stock (the “Shares”) of Goldenwell Biotech, Inc.,
a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), set forth below, upon and subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the
Company’s Prospectus dated _________, 2020, in the United States Securities and Exchange Commission Registration
Statement on Form S-1, to which this Subscription Agreement is attached and which the Subscriber acknowledges as having received
and read.


 


Total number of shares subscribed for at US $0.05 per share: ________________
shares.


 


Amount paid with this Subscription Agreement at a price of
US $_____ per Share: US $________.


 


This Subscription Agreement constitutes the entire agreement among
the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and may be amended only by a writing executed by all parties.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,


 


The undersigned has executed this Subscription Agreement this ____
day of ______________, 2020.


 


 


Name of Entity (for purchasers which are entities only): _____________________


 


* Signature: _________________________________________


 


* Print Name: ________________________________________


 


Print Title (for purchasers which are entities only): _________________________


 


* Address: ____________________________________________


 


____________________________________________


 


Subscriber’s US Social Security Number or


* Identification number of home jurisdiction: ___________________________


 


Signature of Co-owners, if applicable: ___________________________________


 


* Name as it should appear on the Certificate: _______________________________


 


If Joint Ownership, check one (all parties must sign above):


[ ] Joint Tenants with Right of Survivorship


[ ] Tenants in Common


[ ] Community Property


If Fiduciary or Business Entity check one:


[ ] TrustAuthorized Person _________________________ Capacity_____________________


[ ] EstateAuthorized Person _________________________ 
Capacity_____________________


[ ] CorporationAuthorized Person _________________________ 
Capacity_____________________


[ ] Limited Liability Company


Authorized Person _________________________ 
Capacity_____________________


[ ] PartnershipAuthorized Person _________________________ Capacity_____________________


[ ] Other ____________________ (Describe)


Authorized Person _________________________  
Capacity_____________________


 



    	-1- 



    	 



    

ACCEPTANCE OF SUBSCRIPTION


 


The foregoing Subscription is hereby accepted for and on behalf
of Goldenwell Biotech, Inc. this _____ day of _____________, 2020.


 


 


GOLDENWELL BIOTECH, INC.


 


 


By: ______________________________


Name: _______________________


Title: _______________________


    	-2-
#### § 78.55 Time of operation.

A CARS station is not expected to adhere to any prescribed schedule of operation. Continous radiation of the carrier without modulation is permitted provided harmful interference is not caused to other authorized stations.

[43 FR 25127, June 9, 1978]
§ 218.150 Specified activity and geographical region. ( a ) Regulations in this subpart apply only to the U.S. Navy (Navy) for the taking of marine mammals that occurs in the area described in paragraph (b) of this section and that occurs incidental to the activities listed in paragraph (c) of this section.
( b ) The Gulf of Alaska (GOA) Study Area is entirely at sea and is comprised of three areas: a TMAA, a warning area, and the WMA located south and west of the TMAA. The TMAA and WMA are temporary areas established within the GOA for ships, submarines, and aircraft to conduct training activities. The TMAA is a polygon roughly resembling a rectangle oriented from northwest to southeast, approximately 300 nautical miles (nmi; 556 km) in length by 150 nmi (278 km) in width, located south of Montague Island and east of Kodiak Island. The warning area overlaps and extends slightly beyond the northern corner of the TMAA. The WMA provides an additional 185,806 nmi2 of surface, sub-surface, and airspace training area to support activities occurring within the TMAA. The boundary of the WMA follows the bottom of the slope at the 4,000 m contour line.
( c ) The taking of marine mammals by the Navy is only authorized if it occurs incidental to the Navy conducting training activities, including: ( 1 ) Anti-Submarine Warfare; and
( 2 ) Surface Warfare.
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P338Waking in Oak Creek: A Guide for Community ScreeningsThis guide is designed to help community groups facilitate discussions and training sessions in conjunction with screenings of the 35-minute Not In Our Town film Waking in Oak Creek. Produced in collaboration with the COPS Office, the film profiles a suburban community and local law enforcement attempting to heal after their town is rocked by deadly hate crime shootings at a Sikh temple in Wisconsin, killing six Sikh worshippers. In the following year, community leaders, family members, and police - including an officer shot 15 times by the assailant - join forces to address underlying issues of hate and intolerance. This guide provides discussion questions for use in community screenings. Used together, the film and guide can help agencies and communities work to prevent hate crimes, improve law enforcement-community relations, improve hate crime reporting, enhance investigations and prosecutions, and support victims.Categories: Community PartnershipsLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p338Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFBook • Aug 2015Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 02:21 (UTC-5) in 0.19 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
[No. 3213.]

#### John Hefner *v.*The State.

1. Compliant—Variance.—The date of the offense is' alleged in the complaint as “ one thousand eight hundred eight four.” In the information it is set out as “ March 30,1884." *Held,*that the complaint alleges an impossible date, and that the motion to quash the information upon the ground of -fatal variance should have prevailed.

2. Pleading—Practice—Autrefois Convict, to be considered as a plea, must allege the proceedings which resulted in such former conviction, *i. e.,*matter of record, to wit, the former indictment and conviction; and matters of fact, to wit, the identity of the person convicted, and of the offense of which he was convicted. See *Williams*v. *The State,*13 Texas Court of Appeals, 285, for the rule as stated, which is a correction of the rule as laid down in *Troy*v. *The State,*10 Texas Court of Appeals, 319.

Appeal from the County Court of Wilbarger. Tried below before the Hon. J. P. Orr, Special County Judge.

The conviction was for an aggravated assault and battery, and the penalty imposed was a fine of fifty dollars.

*Wheeler & McGhee,*for appellant.

*J. H. Burts,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.'

White, Presiding Judge.

In the complaint the date of the offense as written is “one thousand eight hundred *eight four.”*In the information the date is set forth as the thirtieth March, A. D. 1884. A motion was made to quash upon the ground of fatal variance. Under the rule laid down in *Collins*v. *The State,*5 Texas Court of Appeals, 37, the motion was well taken and should have been sustained.

*574Defendant’s plea of former conviction was an almost literal copy of such a plea in *Troy*v. *The State,*10 Texas Court of Appeals, 319, which this court held to be good; but which does not appear to be good under subsequent decisions *(Williams*v. *The State,*13 Texas Ct. App., 285,) and the court did not err in striking the same out for insufficiency.

Because the complaint states an impossible date, and because of fatal variance between the information and complaint, the judgment is reversed and the prosecution is dismissed.

*Reversed and dismissed.*

Opinion delivered June 25, 1884.
Order Issued October 18, 2012 

In The 

C!tnurt nf Appeals 

lf.ifth, ilistrict nf Wems at sallits 

No. 05-10-00467-CR 

KENNY WIGGINS, Appellant 

v. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. F09-54476-J 

ORDER 

On the Court's own motion, we WITHDRAW the mandate issued in this matter on April 

30,2012. We DIRECT that a new mandate issue forthwith reflecting that the judgment of the trial 

court is modified to delete the $7 500 fine from the trial court's judgment and affirming the judgment 

as modified. 

ROBERT M. FILLMORE 

JUSTICE
Editorial Note on Part 97
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 97 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 97.519 Coordinating examination sessions. ( a ) A VEC must coordinate the efforts of VEs in preparing and administering examinations.
( b ) At the completion of each examination session, the coordinating VEC must collect applicant information and test results from the administering VEs. The coordinating VEC must: ( 1 ) Screen collected information;
( 2 ) Resolve all discrepancies and verify that the VEs' certifications are properly completed; and
( 3 ) For qualified examinees, forward electronically all required data to the FCC. All data forwarded must be retained for at least 15 months and must be made available to the FCC upon request.
( c ) Each VEC must make any examination records available to the FCC, upon request
( d ) The FCC may: ( 1 ) Administer any examination element itself;
( 2 ) Readminister any examination element previously administered by VEs, either itself or under the supervision of a VEC or VEs designated by the FCC; or
( 3 ) Cancel the operator/primary station license of any licensee who fails to appear for readministration of an examination when directed by the FCC, or who does not successfully complete any required element that is readministered. In an instancce of such cancellation, the person will be granted an operator/primary station license consistent with completed examination elements that have not been invalidated by not appearing for, or by failing, the examination upon readministration.
[54 FR 25857, June 20, 1989, as amended at 59 FR 54835, Nov. 2, 1994; 62 FR 17567, Apr. 10, 1997; 63 FR 68981, Dec. 14, 1998; 71 FR 66465, Nov. 15, 2006; 79 FR 35291, June 20, 2014]
32.2 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of Genesis Capital Corporation of Nevada pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Genesis Capital Corporation of Nevada (the “Company”) for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Christopher Astrom, Chief Financial Officer of Genesis Capital Corporation of Nevada, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of        2002, that: 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: February 16, 2010 

|   |                    |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | /s/ CHRISTOPHER ASTROM  |   |
|   |                         |   |
|   | Christopher Astrom      |   |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |   |

34

----
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5087

To maintain funding and staffing for the Office of National Drug Control

Policy for fiscal year 1995.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 23, 1994

Mr. FRANKS of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Government Operations

A BILL

To maintain funding and staffing for the Office of National

Drug Control Policy for fiscal year 1995.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MAINTAINING FUNDING AND PERSONNEL FOR

4 FISCAL YEAR 1995 FOR OFFICE OF NATIONAL

5 DRUG CONTROL POLICY.

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the

7 amount of funds and the number of personnel available

8 for the balance of fiscal year 1995 for activities of the

9 Office of National Drug Control Policy may not be re-
2

•HR 5087 IH

1 duced below the amount or number, respectively, available

2 on the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
§ 217.100 Specified activity and specified geographical region. ( a ) Regulations in this subpart apply only to the University of California Santa Cruz's Partnership for Interdisciplinary Studies of Coastal Oceans (UCSC/PISCO) and those persons it authorizes or funds to conduct activities on its behalf for the taking of marine mammals that occurs in the areas outlined in paragraph (b) of this section and that occur incidental to rocky intertidal monitoring research surveys.
( b ) The taking of marine mammals by UCSC/PISCO may be authorized in a Letter of Authorization (LOA) only if it occurs on the coasts of Oregon or California.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of United American Healthcare Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Gregory H. Moses, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
William E. Jackson, II, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Dated:  October 15, 2002

/s/ Gregory H. Moses, Jr.
--------------------------------------------
President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)


/s/ William E. Jackson, II
--------------------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)
No. 11-9651.

#### Wimberly *v.*Walden et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-9950.

#### Patino *v.*Palmer, Warden, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.