alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Company and Address Brand and Type Source/Plant Boral Materials Technologies Apache Class F Arizona Electric Power Co-op 45 Northeast Loop 410, Suite 700 Fly Ash Cochise, Arizona San Antonio, TX 78216 (210)349-4069 Boral Materials Technologies Monticello Class F Monticello Plant 45 Northeast Loop 410, Suite 700 Fly Ash Monticello, TX San Antonio, TX 78216 (210)349-4069 Boral Materials Technologies Rockdale Class F Rockdale Plant 45 Northeast Loop 410, Suite 700 Fly Ash Rockdale, TX San Antonio, TX 78216 (210)349-4069 Boral Materials Technologies Rockdale Class F Rockdale Plant 45 Northeast Loop 410, Suite 700 Boral Micron 3 Fly Ash Rockdale, TX San Antonio, TX 78216 (210)349-4069 ` Boral Materials Technologies Snowflake Class F Stone Container 45 Northeast Loop 410, Suite 700 Fly Ash Snowflake, Arizona San Antonio, TX 78216 (210)349-4069 Headwaters Resources Navajo Class F Salt River Project 16817 155th Pl SE Fly Ash Navajo Power Plant Renton, WA 98058 Page, Arizona (425)970-3155 Lhoist North America Hi -Cal Hydrated Lime Nelson Plant Mile Marker 112, Route 66 Peach Springs, Arizona P.O. Box 370 Peach Springs, AZ 86434 928-769-2271 Mineral Resource Technologies (Cemex) Coronado Class C Salt River Project 920 Memorial City Way Suite 100 Fly Ash St. Johns, Arizona Houston, TX 77024 (281)685-4312 SRMG/Phoenix Cement Cholla Class F APS Power Plant 8800 E. Chaparral Rd. Suite 155 Fly Ash Joseph City, Arizona Scottsdale, AZ 85250-2606 (480)850-5757 SRMG/Phoenix Cement Escalante Class F Tri-State Generation 8800 E. Chaparral Rd. Suite 155 Fly Ash Prewitt, New Mexico Scottsdale, AZ 85250-2606 (480)850-5757 

### APPROVED MATERIALS SOURCE LIST
FLY ASH, NATURAL POZZOLAN, AND LIME REVISED JULY 10, 2012Company and Address Brand and Type Source/Plant 

### APPROVED MATERIALS SOURCE LIST

FLY ASH, NATURAL POZZOLAN, AND LIME REVISED JULY 10, 2012

SRMG/Phoenix Cement Four Corners Class F APS Power Plant 8800 E. Chaparral Rd. Suite 155 Fly Ash Fruitland, New Mexico Scottsdale, AZ 85250-2606 (480)850-5757 SRMG/Phoenix Cement San Juan Class F San Juan Generating Station 8800 E. Chaparral Rd. Suite 155 Fly Ash Waterflow, NM Scottsdale, AZ 85250-2606 (480)850-5757
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2095]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-504]

[[Page 2095]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

Charter Renewal for Humanities Panel

AGENCY: The National Endowment for the Humanities.

ACTION: Notice of Charter Renewal for Humanities Panel.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 
1972, 5 U.S.C. App. 2 (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770), as amended, the 
National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) gives notice that the 
Charter for the Advisory Committee, Humanities Panel, was renewed for 
an additional two-year period on December 29, 2011.
    The Chairman of NEH has determined that the renewal of the 
Humanities Panel is necessary and in the public interest in connection 
with the performance of duties imposed upon the Chairman of NEH by the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972, 5 U.S.C. App. 3(2) (Pub. L. 92-
463, 86 Stat. 770), as amended, and Section 10(a)(4) of the National 
Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, 20 U.S.C. 
959(a)(4), as amended.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisette Voyatzis, Committee Management 
Officer, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Room 529, Washington, DC 20506. 
Telephone: (202) 606-8322, facsimile (202) 606-8600, or email at 
gencounsel@neh.gov. Hearing-impaired individuals are advised that 
information on this matter may be obtained by contacting the NEH's TDD 
terminal on (202) 606-8282.

Lisette Voyatzis,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-504 Filed 1-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536-01-P
```
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-85,529-01

EX PARTE JOSE ANDRES DE LA ROSA, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. CR-1838-93-D(1) IN THE 206TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HIDALGO COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of 

marihuana and sentenced to twelve years’ imprisonment. The Thirteenth Court of Appeals affirmed

his conviction. De La Rosa v. State, No. 13-94-00356-CR (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi Sept. 14,

1995) (not designated for publication).

Applicant contends that he is entitled to time spent out of custody on an appeal bond. The

trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law and recommended that we grant relief. 

According to the trial court’s findings and conclusions, Applicant testified at an evidentiary hearing
2

on June 10, 2016. The reporter’s record of that hearing was not, however, forwarded with the habeas

record.

This application will be held in abeyance. The reporter’s record shall be forwarded to this

Court within 90 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this

Court.

Filed: September 14, 2016

Do not publish
§ 90.215 Transmitter measurements. ( a ) The licensee of each station shall employ a suitable procedure to determine that the carrier frequency of each transmitter authorized to operate with an output power in excess of two watts is maintained within the tolerence prescribed in § 90.213. This determination shall be made, and the results entered in the station records in accordance with the following: ( 1 ) When the transmitter is initially installed;
( 2 ) When any change is made in the transmitter which may affect the carrier frequency or its stability.
( b ) The licensee of each station shall employ a suitable procedure to determine that each transmitter authorized to operate with an output power in excess of two watts does not exceed the maximum figure specified on the current station authorization. On authorizations stating only the input power to the final radiofrequency stage, the maximum permissible output power is 75 percent for frequencies below 25 MHz and 60 percent of the input power for frequencies above 25 MHz. If a non-DC final radiofrequency stage is utilized, then the output power shall not exceed 75 percent of the input power. This determination shall be made, and the results thereof entered into the station records, in accordance with the following: ( 1 ) When the transmitter is initially installed;
( 2 ) When any change is made in the transmitter which may increase the transmitter power input.
( c ) The licensee of each station shall employ a suitable procedure to determine that the modulation of each transmitter, which is authorized to operate with an output power in excess of two watts, does not exceed the limits specified in this part. This determination shall be made and the following results entered in the station records, in accordance with the following: ( 1 ) When the transmitter is initially installed;
( 2 ) When any change is made in the transmitter which may affect the modulation characteristics.
( d ) The determinations required by paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of this section may, at the opinion of the licensee, be made by a qualified engineering measurement service, in which case the required record entries shall show the name and address of the engineering measurement service as well as the name of the person making the measurements.
( e ) In the case of mobile transmitters, the determinations required by paragraphs (a) and (c) of this section may be made at a test or service bench: *Provided,* That the measurements are made under load conditions equivalent to actual operating conditions; and provided further, that after installation in the mobile unit the transmitter is given a routine check to determine that it is capable of being received satisfactorly by an appropriate receiver.
Fill in this information to identify your case:

Debtor 1 Geneva L. Stewart

First Name Middle Name Last Name

Debtor 2

(Spouse if, filing) First Name Middle Name Last Name

United States Bankruptcy Court for the: NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case number

(if known)  Check if this an

amended filing

B 103A 

Application for Individuals to Pay the Filing Fee in Installments 12/15

Be as complete and accurate as possible. If two married people are filing together, both are equally responsible for supplying correct

information.

Part 1: Specify Your Proposed Payment Timetable

1. Which chapter of the Bankruptcy Code are

you choosing to file under?

 Chapter 7

 Chapter 11

 Chapter 12

 Chapter 13

2. You may apply to pay the filing fee in up to

four installments. Fill in the amounts you

propose to pay and the dates you plan to

pay them. Be sure all dates are business

days. Then add the payments you propose

to pay. $ 83.75

 With the filing of the petition

 On or before this date.........

MM / DD/ YYYY

You must propose to pay the entire fee no

later than 120 days after you file this $ 83.75 On or before this date........... 8/26/16

bankruptcy case. If the court approves your MM / DD/ YYYY

application, the court will set your final $ 83.75 On or before this date........... 9/25/16

payment timetable. MM / DD/ YYYY

+ $ 83.75 On or before this date........... 10/25/16

MM / DD/ YYYY

$

335.00

Total Your total must equal the entire fee for the chapter you checked in line 1.

Part 2: Sign Below

By signing here, you state that you are unable to pay the full filing fee at once, that you want to pay the fee in installments, and that you

understand that:

•

You must pay your entire filing fee before you make any more payments or transfer any more property to an attorney, bankruptcy petition

preparer, or anyone else for services in connection with your bankruptcy case.

•

You must pay the entire fee no later than 120 days after you first file for bankruptcy, unless the court later extends your deadline. Your

debts will not be discharged until your entire fee is paid.

•

If you do not make any payment when it is due, your bankruptcy case may be dismissed, and your rights in other bankruptcy proceedings

may be affected.

X /s/ Geneva L. Stewart X X /s/ Jeffry A Dahlberg

Geneva L. Stewart Jeffry A Dahlberg

Signature of Debtor 1 Signature of Debtor 2 Your attorney’s name and signature, if you used one

Date July 22, 2016 Date Date July 22, 2016

MM / DD / YYYY MM / DD / YYYY MM/ DD / YYYY

You propose to pay...

B 103A (Official Form 103A) Application for Individuals to Pay the Filing Fee in Installments

Software Copyright (c) 1996-2016 Best Case, LLC - www.bestcase.com Best Case Bankruptcy

Case 16-81777 Doc 2 Filed 07/27/16 Entered 07/27/16 12:03:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
§ 29.114 What safety standards must I meet? To ensure the safety of your operations, you must: ( a ) Maintain your area of operations in a manner that avoids or minimizes the cause or spread of fire and does not intensify fire originating outside your operations area;
( b ) Maintain structures, facilities, improvements, and equipment in a safe and professional manner in order not to create an unsafe environment for refuge resources, visitors, and employees, by avoiding or minimizing exposure to physical and chemical hazards; and
( c ) Provide site-security measures to protect visitors from hazardous conditions resulting from your operations.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 10341

IN RE: JOEL LENAMON, DEBTOR

JOEL LENAMON, Appellant
v. MORRIS FAMILY TRUST PARTNERSHIP , Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:15-CV- 570 -Y

Before JO NES , BARKSDALE, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * T his appeal has been considered in the light of the briefs and pertinent parts of the rec ord. Based upon that review, the district court’s order remanding this matter to the bankruptcy court for further proceedings, Lenamon v. Morris Family P ’ship , Civ. Action No. 4:15

- CV

- 570

- Y, Doc. 13 (N.

* Pursuant to 5 th Cir. R

. 47.5 , the c ourt has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 th Cir. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 12, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-10341 Document: 00513792793 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/12/201616- 10341

2 D. Tex. 1 March 2016), does not meet the criteria for “final judgments, orders, or decrees ” , 28 U.S.C. § 158(d), as required for an appeal to this court. E.g., In re Yazoo Pipeline Co., L.P. , 746 F.3d 211, 214

- 15 (5th Cir. 2014). Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Case: 16-10341 Document: 00513792793 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/12/2016
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1500/2005

of 15 September 2005         

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 9 to 15 September 2005 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 16 September 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 September 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

(2)OJ L 174, 7.7.2005, p. 12.

(3)OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last modified by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

----
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5051 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5051

    To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to prohibit insured 
depository institutions from imposing any fees with respect to certain 
deposits of rolled coins by individuals who are not more than 16 years 
                                of age.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 19, 1994

  Mr. Klein introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
            Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to prohibit insured 
depository institutions from imposing any fees with respect to certain 
deposits of rolled coins by individuals who are not more than 16 years 
                                of age.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Youth Depositor Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON IMPOSITION OF FEES WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN 
              DEPOSITS OF ROLLED COINS.

    Section 18 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1828) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(q) Prohibition on Imposition of Fees With Respect to Certain 
Deposits of Rolled Coins.--No insured depository institution may impose 
any fee in connection with the deposit of rolled United States coins 
into an account maintained at such institution by any individual who is 
not more than 16 years of age.''.
                                 <all>
```
Case 16-23537 Doc 1-1 Filed 07/22/16 Entered 07/22/16 12:16:49 Desc 

 Signature Pages Page 1 of 6
Case 16-23537 Doc 1-1 Filed 07/22/16 Entered 07/22/16 12:16:49 Desc 

 Signature Pages Page 2 of 6
Case 16-23537 Doc 1-1 Filed 07/22/16 Entered 07/22/16 12:16:49 Desc 

 Signature Pages Page 3 of 6
Case 16-23537 Doc 1-1 Filed 07/22/16 Entered 07/22/16 12:16:49 Desc 

 Signature Pages Page 4 of 6
Case 16-23537 Doc 1-1 Filed 07/22/16 Entered 07/22/16 12:16:49 Desc 

 Signature Pages Page 5 of 6
Case 16-23537 Doc 1-1 Filed 07/22/16 Entered 07/22/16 12:16:49 Desc 

 Signature Pages Page 6 of 6
September 9, 2011

Ms. Vanessa Hinkle (8P-AR)

US Environmental Protection Agency Region VIII

1595 Wynkoop Street

Denver, CO 80202-1129

Re: NOx Control Supplement to Attachment 2 of January 31, 2011 Response to Request for

Reasonable Progress Information – Colstrip Generating Plant Units 3&4

Dear Ms. Hinkle:

Enclosed please find PPL Montana’s submittal of a Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) Control supplement

to Attachment 2 of our January 31, 2011 Reasonable Progress analyses for the Colstrip

Generating Plant Units 3&4. We provide this supplement pursuant to EPA’s request in your

May 18, 2011 correspondence, the subsequent discussions between EPA and PPL Montana, and

the schedule for target submittal dates agreed upon on June 27, 2011. This supplement provides

updated cost effectiveness analyses of selective non catalytic reduction (SNCR) and Selective

Catalytic Reduction (SCR) technologies.

Please contact me at 406-237-6932 or Reid Clemmer at 610-774-5475 with any questions.

Sincerely,

James M Parker

James M Parker, PE

Manager, Environmental Compliance Services

JMP/rtc

CC: Dave Klemp, Debbie Skibicki - MTDEQ

Attachment: Colstrip Units 3&4 NOx Addendum 9_9_11.pdf

James M Parker

Manager – Compliance Services, Env

PPL Montana, LLC

303 N. Broadway, Suite 400

Billings, MT 59101

Tel. 406.740.9998 Fax 406.237.6901

jmparker@pplweb.com
EXHIBIT 32.2


                          SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
                1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the Form 10-QSB of  Discovery  Investments  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Donald
Bell,  Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that based on my knowledge:

     1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  October 14, 2003


/s/ DONALD BELL
______________________________________
Donald Bell
Chief Financial Officer




A SIGNED  ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT  REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE  ELECTRONIC  VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN  PROVIDED TO  DISCOVERY  INVESTMENTS  INC. AND
WILL BE RETAINED BY DISCOVERY  INVESTMENTS  INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4226 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

IN RE: ) Chapter 7

)

MATOBA, TIMOTHY K., and

MATOBA, KIMBERLY S., 

) Bankruptcy No. 16-27750

)

Debtor(s).

)

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on December 1, 2017, I served by prepaid first class mail or via 

electronic service as indicated a copy of the Notice of Trustee’s Final Report and Applications for 

Compensation and Deadline to Object (NFR) on all parties listed below at the addresses contained therein.

VIA ECF SERVICE

Patrick S. Layng

US Trustee

219 S. Dearborn Street

Room 873

Chicago, IL 60604

CARL F. SAFANDA, ESQ

Safanda Law Firm

111 East Side Drive

Geneva, IL 60134

VIA REGULAR MAIL

MATOBA, TIMOTHY K.

MATOBA, KIMBERLY S.

1300 BURKE LANE

SOUTH ELGIN, IL 60177

Internal Revenue Service

230 S. Dearborn St.,

Mail Stop 5010 CHI

Chicago, IL 60604

American InfoSource LP as 

agent for

TD Bank, USA

PO Box 248866

Oklahoma City, OK 73124-8866

MIDLAND FUNDING LLC

PO BOX 2011

WARREN, MI 48090

Capital One NA

c/o Becket and Lee LLP

PO Box 3001

Malvern, PA 19355-0701

Bureaus Investment Group 

Portfolio No 15 LLC

c/o PRA Receivables 

Management, LLC

PO Box 41021

Norfolk, VA 23541

Presence Health

by American InfoSource LP as 

agent

PO Box 248838

Oklahoma City, OK 73124-8838

PYOD, LLC its successors and 

assigns as assignee

of Citibank, N.A.

Resurgent Capital Services,

PO Box 19008

Greenville, SC 29602

/s/ THOMAS E. SPRINGER, TRUSTEE

THOMAS E. SPRINGER, Trustee

300 S. County Farm Rd., Ste.I

Wheaton, IL 60187

Phone: (630) 510-0000

Case 16-27750 Doc 34 Filed 12/01/17 Entered 12/01/17 15:16:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
§ 216.34 Issuance criteria. ( a ) For the Office Director to issue any permit under this subpart, the applicant must demonstrate that: ( 1 ) The proposed activity is humane and does not present any unnecessary risks to the health and welfare of marine mammals;
( 2 ) The proposed activity is consistent with all restrictions set forth at § 216.35 and any purpose-specific restrictions as appropriate set forth at § 216.41, § 216.42, and § 216.43;
( 3 ) The proposed activity, if it involves endangered or threatened marine mammals, will be conducted consistent with the purposes and policies set forth in section 2 of the ESA;
( 4 ) The proposed activity by itself or in combination with other activities, will not likely have a significant adverse impact on the species or stock;
( 5 ) Whether the applicant's expertise, facilities, and resources are adequate to accomplish successfully the objectives and activities stated in the application;
( 6 ) If a live animal will be held captive or transported, the applicant's qualifications, facilities, and resources are adequate for the proper care and maintenance of the marine mammal; and
( 7 ) Any requested import or export will not likely result in the taking of marine mammals or marine mammal parts beyond those authorized by the permit.
( b ) The opinions or views of scientists or other persons or organizations knowledgeable of the marine mammals that are the subject of the application or of other matters germane to the application will be considered.
[61 FR 21936, May 10, 1996]