alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.26


Amendment No. 2


to


Employment
Agreement of Dave Schaeffer


This amendment is made by
and between Cogent Communications, Inc. (the “Company”) and David Schaeffer (“Executive”).  It amends the Employment Agreement dated
February 7, 2000 between the parties.


1.             The expiration of the Extension Term shall be December
31, 2008, i.e. the Employment Agreement shall extend through December 31, 2008.


2.             In Section 2 the last sentence is deleted, i.e. failure
to elect the designees of Executive to the board of directors shall not be
breach of the Employment Agreement.


3.             In the definition of “Good Reason” contained in Section
1(o) the phrase “(other than any such change resulting from the election by the
Board of a non-executive Chairman, as approved by 2/3 of the Board then
sitting)” is deleted.  The parties agree
that failure to elect the Executive as chairman of the Board shall constitute a
“failure to reelect him to his positions” which entitles him to resign for Good
Reason.


3.             The obligation in Section 5(c) to purchase a life
insurance policy for the benefit of Executive shall expire on March 23, 2009
(the date on which the guaranteed premium amounts of the current term life
policy end).


4.             In Section 13 the requirement to send a copy of any
notice to John D. Watson is deleted and the address for notices to the Company
is changed to:


Chief Legal Officer


Cogent Communications,
Inc.


1015 31st Street, NW


Washington, DC 20007


Fax 202-338-8798


5.             The parties agree that there is no page 2 and no
Sections between Section 1(d)(iv) and 1(l) in the Employment Agreement.


6.             Except as herein amended the Employment Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect.


	
  Accepted and Agreed to:

  	
   

  	
  .

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Cogent Communications, Inc

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ David
  Schaeffer

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  by:

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Edward Glassmeyer

  
	
  David Schaeffer

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Edward Glassmeyer

  
	
  In his
  individual capacity

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  on behalf of the Compensation Committee and the
  Board of Directors

  
	
  Date:  March 12, 2007

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Date:

  	
   

  	
  March 12, 2007
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jupitermedia Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alan M. Meckler, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|/s/ Alan M. Meckler                                             
|                                                                
|Alan M. Meckler Chairman and Chief Executive Officer May 7, 2004



This certification is made solely
for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. § 1350, subject to the knowledge standard therein, and not for any other purpose.
§ 9.17 Enforcement, compliance date, State law. ( a ) *Enforcement.* ( 1 ) Sections 9.16(a)(1) and (b)(1) and (2) shall be enforced under title V of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 501 *et seq.,* except that section 501 applies only to the extent that such section provides for the punishment of a fine.
( 2 ) In the event of noncompliance with § 9.16(b), the person engaged in the business of managing the multi-line telephone system shall be presumed to be responsible for the noncompliance.
( 3 ) Persons alleging a violation of the rules in § 9.16 may file a complaint under the procedures set forth in §§ 1.711 through 1.737 of this chapter.
( b ) *Compliance date.* The compliance date for this subpart F is February 16, 2020, unless otherwise noted. Accordingly, the requirements in this subpart apply to a multi-line telephone system that is manufactured, imported, offered for first sale or lease, first sold or leased, or installed after February 16, 2020, unless otherwise noted.
( c ) *Effect on State law.* Nothing in § 9.16(a)(1) and (b)(1) and (2) is intended to alter the authority of State commissions or other State or local agencies with jurisdiction over emergency communications, if the exercise of such authority is not inconsistent with this subpart.
[84 FR 66760, Dec. 5, 2019, as amended at 87 FR 60105, Oct. 4, 2022]
Case 16-26485 Doc 1 Filed 08/17/16 Entered 08/17/16 16:28:28 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 9
Case 16-26485 Doc 1 Filed 08/17/16 Entered 08/17/16 16:28:28 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 9
Case 16-26485 Doc 1 Filed 08/17/16 Entered 08/17/16 16:28:28 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 9
Case 16-26485 Doc 1 Filed 08/17/16 Entered 08/17/16 16:28:28 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 9
Case 16-26485 Doc 1 Filed 08/17/16 Entered 08/17/16 16:28:28 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 9
Case 16-26485 Doc 1 Filed 08/17/16 Entered 08/17/16 16:28:28 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 9
Case 16-26485 Doc 1 Filed 08/17/16 Entered 08/17/16 16:28:28 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 9
Case 16-26485 Doc 1 Filed 08/17/16 Entered 08/17/16 16:28:28 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 9
Case 16-26485 Doc 1 Filed 08/17/16 Entered 08/17/16 16:28:28 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 9
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 12 (Tuesday, January 20, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2771-2772]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00790]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 9003]

In the Matter of the Designation of Maulana Fazlullah also known 
as Mullah Fazlullah; also known as Fazal Hayat; also known as Mullah 
Radio as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist Pursuant to Section 
1(b) of Executive Order 13224, as Amended

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) 
of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive 
Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 
2003, I hereby determine that the individual known as Maulana Fazlullah 
also known as Mullah Fazlullah also known as Fazal Hayat also known as 
Mullah Radio, committed, or poses a significant risk of committing, 
acts of terrorism that threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the 
national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States.
    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that ``prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have

[[Page 2772]]

a constitutional presence in the United States would render ineffectual 
the blocking and other measures authorized in the Order because of the 
ability to transfer funds instantaneously,'' I determine that no prior 
notice needs to be provided to any person subject to this determination 
who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, because 
to do so would render ineffectual the measures authorized in the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: January 9, 2015.
John F. Kerry,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-00790 Filed 1-16-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 300

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 300 appear at 64 FR 44431, Aug. 16, 1999, and at 76 FR 59305, Sept. 26, 2011.

#### § 300.128 Penalties.

Any person committing or fishing vessel used in the commission of a violation of the Magnuson-Stevens Act or any regulation issued under the Magnuson-Stevens Act, is subject to the civil and criminal penalty provisions and civil forfeiture provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, to part 600 of this title, to 15 CFR part 904, and to other applicable law. In addition, Colombian authorities may require a vessel involved in a violation of this subpart to leave treaty waters.
#### § 26.23 Exception for entry to the headquarters office.

The headquarters office of any national wildlife refuge is open to public access and admission during regularly established business hours.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         114,818
<SECURITIES>                                    10,396
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,619
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,247)
<INVENTORY>                                        795
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               149,462
<PP&E>                                          22,310
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,402)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 348,026
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,837
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            40
<OTHER-SE>                                     297,275
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   348,026
<SALES>                                         49,013
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                49,013
<CGS>                                           12,740
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,483
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                48,631
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 147
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (42,135)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (42,135)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (42,135)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.37)


</TABLE>
#### § 23.42 What are the requirements for a plant hybrid?

*General provisions.* Except as provided in [§ 23.92](/on/2024-09-20/title-50/section-23.92), the export, re-export, or import of a plant hybrid of a CITES species must be accompanied by a valid CITES document that shows the Appendix of the specimen as follows:

| Question on a plant hybrid | Answer and status of specimen |
| --- | --- |
| (a) Is the specimen an artificially propagated hybrid of one or more Appendix-I species or taxa? | (1) **YES.** Continue to [paragraph (b)](/on/2024-09-20/title-50/section-23.42#p-23.42(b)) of this section. (2) **NO.** Continue to [paragraph (c)](/on/2024-09-20/title-50/section-23.42#p-23.42(c)) of this section. |
| (b) Is one or more of the Appendix-I species or taxa in [paragraph (a)](/on/2024-09-20/title-50/section-23.42#p-23.42(a)) of this section annotated to treat hybrids as Appendix-I specimens? | (1) **YES.** The hybrid is listed in Appendix I. (2) **NO.** The hybrid is listed in Appendix I, but may be granted a certificate for artificially propagated plants even if propagated for commercial purposes. |
| (c) Is the specimen a hybrid that includes two or more CITES species or taxa in its lineage? | (1) **YES.** Consider the specimen to be listed in the more restrictive Appendix, with Appendix I being the most restrictive and Appendix III the least. (2) **NO.** Continue to [paragraph (d)](/on/2024-09-20/title-50/section-23.42#p-23.42(d)) of this section. |
| (d) Is the specimen a hybrid that includes one CITES species or taxon in its lineage? | (1) **YES.** Consider the specimen to be listed in the Appendix in which the species or taxon is listed in the CITES Appendices. (2) **NO.** The hybrid is not regulated by CITES. |

[[72 FR 48448](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/72-FR-48448), Aug. 23, 2007, as amended at [79 FR 30425](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/79-FR-30425), May 27, 2014]
Case 16-24989 Doc 1 Filed 08/03/16 Entered 08/03/16 15:59:11 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 10
Case 16-24989 Doc 1 Filed 08/03/16 Entered 08/03/16 15:59:11 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 10
Case 16-24989 Doc 1 Filed 08/03/16 Entered 08/03/16 15:59:11 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 10
Case 16-24989 Doc 1 Filed 08/03/16 Entered 08/03/16 15:59:11 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 10
Case 16-24989 Doc 1 Filed 08/03/16 Entered 08/03/16 15:59:11 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 10
Case 16-24989 Doc 1 Filed 08/03/16 Entered 08/03/16 15:59:11 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 10
Case 16-24989 Doc 1 Filed 08/03/16 Entered 08/03/16 15:59:11 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 10
Case 16-24989 Doc 1 Filed 08/03/16 Entered 08/03/16 15:59:11 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 10
Case 16-24989 Doc 1 Filed 08/03/16 Entered 08/03/16 15:59:11 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 10
Case 16-24989 Doc 1 Filed 08/03/16 Entered 08/03/16 15:59:11 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 10
#### § 253.19 Dual-use CCF.

The Program may require the pledge of a CCF account or annual deposits of some portion of the project property's net income into a dual-use CCF. A dual-use CCF provides the normal CCF tax-deferral benefits, but also gives the Program control of CCF withdrawals, recourse against CCF deposits, ensures an emergency refurbishing reserve (tax-deferred) for project property, and provides additional collateral.
32.2     Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of Genesis Capital
         Corporation of Nevada pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act
         of 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Genesis Capital
Corporation of Nevada (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned Christopher Astrom, Chief Financial Officer of
Genesis Capital Corporation of Nevada, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 8, 2006

                                      /s/ CHRISTOPHER ASTROM
                                      -----------------------
                                      Christopher Astrom
                                      Chief Financial Officer
#### § 95.963 CBRS channel frequencies.

The channels listed in this section are allotted for shared use in the CBRS. Each CBRS channel is designated by its center frequency in Megahertz (MHz).

| CBRS channel No. | Center frequency (MHz) |
| --- | --- |
| 1 | 26.965 |
| 2 | 26.975 |
| 3 | 26.985 |
| 4 | 27.005 |
| 5 | 27.015 |
| 6 | 27.025 |
| 7 | 27.035 |
| 8 | 27.055 |
| 9 | 27.065 |
| 10 | 27.075 |
| 11 | 27.085 |
| 12 | 27.105 |
| 13 | 27.115 |
| 14 | 27.125 |
| 15 | 27.135 |
| 16 | 27.155 |
| 17 | 27.165 |
| 18 | 27.175 |
| 19 | 27.185 |
| 20 | 27.205 |
| 21 | 27.215 |
| 22 | 27.225 |
| 23 | 27.255 |
| 24 | 27.235 |
| 25 | 27.245 |
| 26 | 27.265 |
| 27 | 27.275 |
| 28 | 27.285 |
| 29 | 27.295 |
| 30 | 27.305 |
| 31 | 27.315 |
| 32 | 27.325 |
| 33 | 27.335 |
| 34 | 27.345 |
| 35 | 27.355 |
| 36 | 27.365 |
| 37 | 27.375 |
| 38 | 27.385 |
| 39 | 27.395 |
| 40 | 27.405 |
# Map            Denmark.
- 
      - ** Home
      - ** About Us
      - ** Archives
      - ** Events
      - ** Publications

### Contact Us

To provide feedback on the Community Policing Dispatch, e-mail the editorial board at CPDispatch@usdoj.gov.

To obtain details on COPS Office programs, publications, and resources, contact the COPS Office Response Center at 800-421-6770 or AskCopsRC@usdoj.gov

**U.S. Department of Justice**        Office of Community Oriented Policing Services 
www.cops.usdoj.gov

            - Home
            - About Us
            - Archives
            - Events
            - Publications
            - Contact Us

### **Alternative Public Safety Responses: Harris County (Texas) HART Program**

April 2023 | Volume 16 | Issue 4

In response to ongoing changes to the demands and public expectations for law enforcement and the municipal funding available to meet those demands, local communities across the United States have increased efforts to establish alternative response models for nonviolent calls for service.   

The Harris County (Texas) Department of Public  Health has established Holistic Assistance  Response Teams (HART) that work in support of the county Sheriff’s Office  to enhance public safety. The HART teams consist of trained professionals who provide responses to citizens experiencing homelessness, behavioral health issues, mental health crises, or other non-emergency, nonviolent social issues. 

Barbie Robinson, Executive Director of the Harris County Department of Public Health, joins the COPS Office beat podcast series The Beat to discuss the county’s experience with introducing this new public safety resource. 

Tweet

**Subscribe to Email Updates**
To sign up for monthly updates or to access your subscriber preferences, please enter your email address in the Subscribe box.

The Community Policing Dispatch is the e-newsletter of the COPS Office. 

The Community Policing Dispatch is the e-newsletter of the COPS Office. 

**Explore**
            - Home
            - About Us
            - Archives
            - Events
            - Publications
            - Contact Us

**
Connect With Us 
**
Want to stay connected with the COPS office?             Follow us on social media!
            - 
            - 
            - 
- 
- 
- 

             FOIA 

             No FEAR Act 

             Open Government 

             Plain Writing 

             USA.gov 

             Legal Policies and Disclaimers 

             Language Access Plan 

             DOJ Privacy Policy
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1343/2005

of 16 August 2005         

providing for compensation to producer organisations for tuna delivered to the processing industry between 1 April and 30 June 2004         

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 of 17 December 1999 on the common organisation of the market in fishery and aquaculture products (1), and in particular Article 27(6) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The compensatory allowance provided for in Article 27 of Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 shall be granted for the period from 1 April to 30 June 2004 in respect of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) weighing more than 10 kg each.

The maximum allowance in accordance with the first and second indents of Article 27(2) of Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 shall be fixed at EUR 24 per tonne.

Article 2

1.   The total quantities on which the compensatory allowance is payable shall be 26 353,548 tonnes of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) weighing more than 10 kg each.

2.   The allocation of the total quantity among the producer organisations concerned shall be as set out in the Annex hereto.

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 August 2005.

For the Commission

Joe BORG            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 17, 21.1.2000, p. 22. Regulation as last amended by the 2003 Act of Accession.

(2)OJ L 351, 28.12.2002, p. 3.

(3)OJ L 293, 10.11.2001, p. 11.

----

ANNEX

Allocation among producer organisations of quantities of tuna on which the compensatory allowance is payable for the period from 1 April to 30 June 2004 in accordance with Article 27(4) of Regulation (EC) No 104/2000, broken down by compensation percentage band.

----
Harvest for this publication is in lps25494:

file://acfnas/perm/netsite-docs/lps25494/lps25494/www.airuniversity.af.mil/ASPJ/Archived-Editions/index.htm
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 10.34





                         Report of Independent Auditors
                                        

Board of Directors
OmniCare Health Plan, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of OmniCare Health Plan, Inc. as
of June 30, 1997, and the related statements of operations, stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for the year then ended.  These financial statements are
the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards.  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation.  We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of OmniCare Health Plan, Inc. at
June 30, 1997, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the year
then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

                                                       /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


September 25, 1997