alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Academic Partner Johns Hopkins University to Host 3rd Annual Senior Executive Cyber Security Conference Sept 21
 
  Join us September 21st for the 3rd Annual Senior Executive Cyber Security Conference, "Navigating Today's Cyber Security Terrain."
                                    View this email in your browser**3rd Annual Senior Executive Cyber Security Conference:*****Navigating Today’s Cyber Security Terrain***Wednesday, September 21, 2016
                                                8:30 a.m. - 4:00 p.m.
                                                Reception to follow
                                                Johns Hopkins University, Homewood Campus
                                                Charles Commons
                                                10 N. 33rd Street
                                                Baltimore, MD 21218
            
            You are cordially invited to attend the Johns Hopkins University Information Security Institute and COMPASS Cyber Security 3rd Annual Senior Executive Cyber Security Conference. This year’s agenda examines the current cyber security landscape, threats, and challenges ahead for organizations and how senior leaders can work towards “shifting their data to being safe and secure.”
                                                The conference will be held on the Homewood campus of Johns Hopkins University on Wednesday, September 21, 2016 from 8:30 a.m. – 4:00 p.m., followed by a networking reception.
                                                **Featured Sessions Include:**
                                                Anatomy of a Data Breach — Michael Misumi, JHU APL
                                                    Breach Response: The Who, What, When, and Where — Mike Colford, AspenInsurance
                                                    Humans are the Weakest Link — Julie Marble, JHU APL
                                                    A panel discussion on Cloud Storage and Data Encryption -- Michele Cohen, Miles and Stockbridge; John Holmblad, Office of the Sergeant at Arms at the U.S. Senate; and Jason Ward, Breakthru Beverage Group**Don't miss this opportunity to discuss today's cyber security movements and network with the leaders in the industry. Register now to receive the early bird pricing!**
                                                Visit our event website to learn more about our speakers, agenda, conference logistics, and to register. Join our conversation on Twitter by using the hashtag: #CyberSecBalt16.
            
            ***Follow us for insights, tips, and stories related to cyber security:***
§ 18.22 Taking by Federal, State or local government officials. ( a ) A Federal, State or local government official or employee may take a marine mammal in the course of his duties as an official or employee and no permit shall be required, if such taking: ( 1 ) Is accomplished in a humane manner;
( 2 ) Is for the protection or welfare of such mammal or from the protection of the public health or welfare; and
( 3 ) Includes steps designed to insure return of such mammal, if not killed in the course of such taking, to its natural habitat. In addition, any such official or employee may, incidental to such taking, possess and transport, but not sell or offer for sale, such mammal and use any port, harbor or other place under the jurisdiction of the United States. All steps reasonably practicable under the circumstances shall be taken by any such employee or official to prevent injury or death to the marine mammal as the result of such taking.
( b ) Each taking permitted under this section should be included in a written report, to be submitted to the Director every six months, beginning December 31, 1973. Unless otherwise permitted by the Director, the report shall contain a description of: ( 1 ) The animal involved;
( 2 ) The circumstances requiring the taking;
( 3 ) The method of taking;
( 4 ) The name and official position of the State official or employee involved;
( 5 ) The disposition of the animal, including in cases where the animal has been retained in captivity, a description of the place and means of confinement and the measures taken for its maintenance and care; and
( 6 ) Such other information as the Director may require.
The reports shall be mailed to the Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC 20240. [39 FR 7262, Feb. 25, 1974, as amended at 51 FR 17981, May 16, 1986]
§ 95.2361 WMTS transmitter certification. ( a ) WMTS transmitters (transmitters that operate or are intended to operate in the WTMS) must be certified in accordance with this subpart and the provisions of part 2, subpart J of this chapter.
( b ) A grant of equipment certification for the WMTS will not be issued for any WMTS transmitter type that fails to comply with the applicable rules in this subpart.
§ 221.71 How do I propose an alternative? ( a ) *General.* To propose an alternative condition or prescription, you must: ( 1 ) Be a license party; and
( 2 ) File a written proposal with the Office of Habitat Conservation, at the address set forth in § 221.2: ( i ) For a case under § 221.1(d)(1), within 30 days after NOAA files a preliminary condition or prescription with FERC; or
( ii ) For a case under § 221.1(d)(2), within 60 days after NOAA files a proposed condition or prescription with FERC.
( b ) *Content.* Your proposal must include: ( 1 ) A description of the alternative, in an equivalent level of detail to NOAA's preliminary condition or prescription;
( 2 ) An explanation of how the alternative: ( i ) If a condition, will provide for the adequate protection and utilization of the reservation; or
( ii ) If a prescription, will be no less protective than the fishway prescribed by NMFS;
( 3 ) An explanation of how the alternative, as compared to the preliminary condition or prescription, will: ( i ) Cost significantly less to implement; or
( ii ) Result in improved operation of the project works for electricity production;
( 4 ) An explanation of how the alternative will affect: ( i ) Energy supply, distribution, cost, and use;
( ii ) Flood control;
( iii ) Navigation;
( iv ) Water supply;
( v ) Air quality; and
( vi ) Other aspects of environmental quality; and
( 5 ) Specific citations to any scientific studies, literature, and other documented information relied on to support your proposal, including any assumptions you are making (*e.g.,* regarding the cost of energy or the rate of inflation). If any such document is not already in the license proceeding record, you must provide a copy with the proposal.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

EDWARD AUSTIN

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 983

[ September 17, 2020 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; John J. Murphy, III

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 92

- 13147 CF10A

.

David W. Collins of Collins Law Firm, Monticello, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

A

ffirmed.

C IKLIN

, C ONNER and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
§ 95.2963 PLB and MSLD frequency bands. ( a ) The frequency band 406.0-406.1 MHz is an emergency and distress frequency band available for use by Personal Locator Beacons (PLBs). Use of these frequencies must be limited to transmission of distress and safety of life communications.
( b ) MSLDs must: ( 1 ) Transmit on at least one of the following frequencies: 121.5 MHz, 156.525 MHz, 156.750 MHz, 156.800 MHz, 156.850 MHz, 161.975 MHz, or 162.025 MHz; or
( 2 ) Include a function intended to send a distress message directly to the U.S. Coast Guard or any other search and rescue organization.
#### § 95.391 Manufacturing, importation, and sales of non-certified equipment prohibited.

No person shall manufacture, import, sell, or offer for sale non-certified equipment for the Personal Radio Services except as provided for in §§ 2.803(c)(2)(i) and 2.1204(a)(11) of this chapter. *See* § 302(b) of the Communications Act (47 U.S.C. 302a(b)). *See also* part 2, subpart I (§ 2.801 *et seq.*) of this chapter for rules governing marketing of radiofrequency devices; part 2, subpart K (§ 2.1201 *et seq.*) of this chapter for rules governing import conditions.

[86 FR 52100, Sept. 20, 2021]
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

RUBI FRANCIS CARDONA,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 13-10348

D.C. No. 4:13-cr-50017-RCC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

James G. Carr, District Judge, Presiding** 

Submitted May 13, 2014*** 

Before: CLIFTON, BEA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges. 

Rubi Francis Cardona appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the revocation of supervised release and four-month sentence imposed

FILED

MAY 23 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The Honorable James G. Carr, Senior United States District Judge for

the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation. 

 *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

Cardona’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief,

along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Cardona

the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or

answering brief has been filed. 

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

2 13-10348
#### § 14.20 Exceptions by permit.

Wildlife may be imported into or exported from the United States at any Customs port of entry designated in the terms of a valid permit issued pursuant to subpart C of this part.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE:

JOE FEIJOO,

 Relator.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00314-CR

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus against 

the 205th District Court of El Paso County, Texas and concludes that Relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus should be denied. We therefore deny the petition for writ of mandamus, in accordance 

with the opinion of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 24TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2020.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5197

To suspend temporarily the duty on nickel isoindoline pigment.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 5, 1994

Mr. TAUZIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on nickel isoindoline

pigment.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NICKEL ISOINDOLINE PIGMENT.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.32.31 Nickel

isoindoline pigment (CAS No.

85958–80–1)

(provided for in

subheading

3204.17.30) ...... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/97

’’.
2

HR 5197 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 this section applies with respect to goods entered, or with3 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the

4 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 154 (Thursday, August 10, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 45840]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6824]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and 
Bioengineering Special Emphasis Panel; ZEB1 OSR-A (O2) S--Conference 
Grants.
    Date: August 18, 2006.
    Time: 12 p.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health/NIBIB, Democracy II, 6707 
Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: David George, PhD, Director, Office of 
Scientific Review, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and 
Bioengineering, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 920, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
301-496-8633, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a8cfcdc7dacfcdcc99e8c5c9c1c486c6c1c086cfc7de"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7512101a07121011443518141c195b1b1c1d5b121a03">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

    Dated: August 1, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-6824 Filed 8-9-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 80.100 Morse code requirement.

The code employed for telegraphy must be the Morse code specified in the Telegraph Regulations annexed to the International Telecommunication Convention. Pertinent extracts from the Telegraph Regulations are contained in the “Manual for Use by the Maritime Mobile and Maritime Mobile-Satellite Services” published by the International Telecommunication Union.
Editorial Note on Part 74
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 74 appear at 64 FR 4055, Jan. 27, 1999.

§ 74.34 Period of construction; certification of completion of construction. ( a ) Each aural and television broadcast auxiliary station authorized under subparts E and F of this part must be in operation within 18 months from the initial date of grant.
( b ) Each remote pickup broadcast auxiliary station authorized under subpart D of this part must be in operation within 12 months from the initial date of grant.
( c ) Failure to timely begin operation means the authorization terminates automatically.
( d ) Requests for extension of time may be granted upon a showing of good cause pursuant to § 1.946(e) of this chapter.
( e ) Construction of any authorized facility or frequency must be completed by the date specified in the license and the Commission must be notified pursuant to § 1.946 of this chapter.
[68 FR 12763, Mar. 17, 2003]
Case 16-00500 Doc 28 Filed 02/08/17 Entered 02/09/17 10:07:04 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 3
Case 16-00500 Doc 28 Filed 02/08/17 Entered 02/09/17 10:07:04 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 3
Case 16-00500 Doc 28 Filed 02/08/17 Entered 02/09/17 10:07:04 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT
32.2: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of China Water Group, Inc.
(the “Company”) certifies that:




1.           The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended March 31,
2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  September
      14, 2009
              /s/ Ding RencaiDing
      Rencai, Chief Executive
Officer
www.cdcnpin.org - /PrevNews/

----

```
[To Parent Directory]     Tuesday, August 31, 2004  3:12 PM        <dir> 1994     Tuesday, August 31, 2004  3:12 PM        <dir> 1995     Tuesday, August 31, 2004  3:11 PM        <dir> 1996     Tuesday, August 31, 2004  3:11 PM        <dir> 1997     Tuesday, August 31, 2004  3:10 PM        <dir> 1998     Tuesday, August 31, 2004  3:10 PM        <dir> 1999     Tuesday, August 31, 2004  3:09 PM        <dir> 2000     Tuesday, August 31, 2004  3:09 PM        <dir> 2001     Tuesday, August 31, 2004  3:08 PM        <dir> 2002     Tuesday, August 31, 2004  3:08 PM        <dir> 2003     Tuesday, August 31, 2004  3:07 PM        <dir> 2004
```

----
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1205/2005

of 27 July 2005         

on granting of import licences for cane sugar for the purposes of certain tariff quotas and preferential agreements

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1),

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1095/96 of 18 June 1996 on the implementation of the concessions set out in Schedule CXL drawn up in the wake of the conclusion of the GATT XXIV.6 negotiations (2),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1159/2003 of 30 June 2003 laying down detailed rules of application for the 2003/04, 2004/05 and 2005/06 marketing years for the import of cane sugar under certain tariff quotas and preferential agreements and amending Regulations (EC) No 1464/95 and (EC) No 779/96 (3), and in particular Article 5(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In the case of import licence applications presented from 18 July to 22 July 2005 in line with Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1159/2003 licences shall be issued for the quantities indicated in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 28 July 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 July 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 987/2005 (OJ L 167, 29.6.2005, p. 12).

(2)OJ L 146, 20.6.1996, p. 1.

(3)OJ L 162, 1.7.2003, p. 25. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 568/2005 (OJ L 97, 15.4.2005, p. 9).

----

ANNEX

ACP-INDIA preferential sugar

Title II of Regulation (EC) No 1159/2003

2004/05 marketing year

2005/06 marketing year

Special preferential sugar

Title III of Regulation (EC) No 1159/2003

2005/06 marketing year

CXL concessions sugar

Title IV of Regulation (EC) No 1159/2003

2005/06 marketing year

----
#### § 20.42 Transportation of birds of another.

No person shall transport migratory game birds belonging to another person unless such birds are tagged as required by § 20.36.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1133/2005

of 14 July 2005         

fixing the export refunds on cereals and on wheat or rye flour, groats and meal

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The export refunds on the products listed in Article 1(a), (b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003, excluding malt, exported in the natural state, shall be as set out in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 15 July 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 July 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

(2)OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1431/2003 (OJ L 203, 12.8.2003, p. 16).

----

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 14 July 2005 fixing the export refunds on cereals and on wheat or rye flour, groats and meal

----
ODP On-Line Data Collection Tool

Data Release Process

1. States may now request that ODP release their needs assessment and state

strategy submission data for interim updates. Interim updates are not required by

ODP, and this capability is being provided only to assist states with their planning

requirements.

2. To request that needs assessment and state strategy submission data be

released, the state administrative agency (SAA) must log on and go into the SAA

handbook. Once in the SAA handbook, the SAA will need to click on the "Request to

Reopen" link in the Introduction section. This will send an email message to ODP

with a request to release the submission back to the state. (Note: The "Request to 

Reopen" link will not be visible if the submission is already released for edits.)

3. The system will send an email message to the SAA when ODP releases the

submission back to the state. (Note: When the data is released, a copy of the

original submission is made so that any revisions to the data do not overwrite the

original approved data.)

4. Once the data is released, the SAA has the ability to reopen the submission for

each of the jurisdictions, add new jurisdictions or delete any existing jurisdictions. 

Additionally, the SAA may update any data that has been submitted, add new data or

delete data. 

5. Once all the changes have been made, the SAA should "resubmit" the data to

ODP. (Note: ODP will not formally review or approve the new submission.) 

Additionally: 

* Before a state can resubmit, the usual completeness checks will apply,

including the requirement that all defined jurisdictions should have submitted their

data to the state. 

* States have the option of submitting a revised domestic preparedness strategy

document or re-attaching the older document with the new submission. A document

MUST be attached for the submission to be made successfully. 

6. In the first release of this new capability, states will not be able to see the original

submission data once changes have been made. However, the original data IS saved

in the Tool database. A data warehousing capability is being developed that will

eventually allow states to view the original, approved submission, or any of the

re-submissions. The capability to run queries using the Data Analysis Tool on each

data set is also being developed. These additional capabilities will be available by the

end of July. 

7. A state can request that ODP release their data multiple times.