alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Robert A. Wirick

Managing Director

Regulatory and International Affairs

4333 Amon Carter Blvd. MD 5635 

Ft. Worth, TX 76155

817-963-0394 Office

817-967-3179 Fax

robert.wirick@aa.com

August 13, 2014

Kevin D. Schlemmer

Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis Division

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Docket DOT-OST-1996-1167, EAS at Ft. Leonard Wood, MO

Dear Mr. DeVany,

American Airlines, Inc. (“American Airlines”) enthusiastically supports the 

proposal of Hyannis Air Service, Inc. dba Cape Air to continue providing Essential 

Air Service for Ft. Leonard Wood, Missouri with the American Airlines codeshare, 

providing to the Ft. Leonard Wood community seamless booking and travel on 

American Airlines’ worldwide network. 

American Airlines Group (NASDAQ: AAL) is the holding company for 

American Airlines and US Airways, Inc. Together with wholly owned and thirdparty regional carriers operating as American Eagle and US Airways Express, the 

airlines operate an average of nearly 6,700 flights per day to 339 destinations in 

54 countries from its hubs in Charlotte, Chicago, Dallas/Fort Worth, Los Angeles, 

Miami, New York, Philadelphia, Phoenix and Washington, D.C. The American 

Airlines AAdvantage and US Airways Dividend Miles programs allow members to 

earn miles for travel, vacation packages, car rentals, hotel stays and everyday 

purchases. American is a founding member of the oneworld alliance, whose 

members and members-elect serve nearly 1,000 destinations with 14,250 daily 

flights to 150 countries.

Thank you for your kind consideration.

Sincerely,
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 18 (Friday, January 27, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 4490]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-757]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R05-OAR-2005-IN-0007; FRL-8025-6]


Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Indiana; Removal of Direct Final Rule

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Removal of direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Due to the receipt of an adverse comment, the EPA is removing 
the November 25, 2005 (70 FR 70999), direct final rule approving 
revisions to Indiana's sulfur dioxide (SO<INF>2</INF>) state 
implementation plan (SIP) for sources located in Dearborn County. These 
revisions to the SIP include: Revising SO<INF>2</INF> emission limits 
for existing sources, making minor corrections by removing obsolete 
rule language, and updating information for sources listed in the rule. 
In the direct final rule, EPA stated that if adverse comments were 
submitted by December 27, 2005, the rule would be withdrawn and not 
take effect. On December 2, 2005, EPA received a comment. EPA believes 
this comment is adverse and, therefore, EPA is removing the direct 
final rule. EPA will address the comment in a subsequent final action 
based upon the proposed action also published on November 25, 2005 (70 
FR 71071). EPA will not institute a second comment period on this 
action.

DATES: This rule is effective on January 27, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Hatten, Environmental 
Engineer, Criteria Pollutant Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), 
EPA, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, 
(312) 886-6031, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a6cec7d2d2c3c888c5cec7d4cac3d5e6c3d6c788c1c9d0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="deb6bfaaaabbb0f0bdb6bfacb2bbad9ebbaebff0b9b1a8">[email protected]</span></a>.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Sulfur dioxides.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: January 18, 2006.
Norman Niedergang,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.

0
Part 52, Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is 
amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart P--Indiana


Sec.  52.770  [Amended]

0
2. Section 52.770 is amended by removing paragraph (c)(171).

[FR Doc. 06-757 Filed 1-26-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
AAM-12-348-E 

May 24, 2012 

 Exemption No. 10541 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2009-0962 

Mr. Wesley H. Verkaart 

Heliops, LLC 

15 Hounds Ditch Lane 

Duxbury, MA 02332 

Dear Mr. Verkaart: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

On April 30, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of 

Heliops, LLC, (Heliops) for an extension of Exemption No. 9958 from 

part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption allowed Heliops, 

which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive 

employees under one testing program. That exemption, however, expired on November 30, 

2011; therefore, we will treat your request as a new petition. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Heliops. 

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into 

one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that 

provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden 

the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs. 
2 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9703; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 

also apply to the situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Heliops, LLC an exemption from part 120 to the extent 

necessary to allow Heliops, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to 

cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program, subject to the following 

conditions and limitations. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Heliops are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while 

conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

 2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the 

 Heliops part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

This exemption terminates on May 31, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

James R. Fraser, M.D. 

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon 

Enclosure
Specimen Certificate


 Exhibit 4.1 
 

 
 Certificate No. 0-A For Zero (0) Shares Issued to Specimen Dated 20 FROM WHOM TRANSFERRED
Specimen Dated 20 No. Original Certificate No. Original Shares No. of Shares Transferred Received Certificate No. 0-A For Zero (0) Shares this day of 20 
 CERTIFICATE NO 0-A 
 SHARES 0 
 CUSIP No. 55305B309 
 M/I HOMES, INC. 
 INCORPORTATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OHIO 
 Authorized Shares Shares Par value $.01 Each 
 This Certifies that Specimen is the holder of Zero (0) shares of 9.75% Series A Preferred Shares of M/I Homes, Inc. 
 Fully paid and non-assessable, transferable only on the books of the Company by the holder hereof in person or by Attorney, upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. 
 In Witness Whereof, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers and its Corporate seal
to be hereunto affixed. 
 Dated this day of 20 
 Specimen Secretary Specimen President 
 Dayton Legal Blank Inc. Form 70036







 

 
 NOTICE: The signature of this Assignment must correspond with the name as written upon the
face of this Certificate, in every particular without alteration or enlargement, or any changes whatever. 
 FOR VALUE
RECEIVED, hereby sell, assign and transfer unto 
 Shares represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably
constitute and appoint Attorney, to transfer the said Shares on the books of the within named Corporation, with full power of substitution in the premises. 
 Dated 20 
 In Presence of 
 CERTIFICATE 
 For 
 0 
 SHARES or 
 9.75% Series A 
 Preferred Shares, 
 Par Value $.01 per share 
 ISSUED TO 
 Specimen 
 DATED 
 Specimen 
 The express terms of the shares evidenced by this certificate and of the other class or classes and series of shares, which the Corporation is authorized to issue are contained in the
Corporation’s Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation and Amended and Restated Regulations. The Corporation will send to any shareholder without charge a copy of such terms within five (5) days after receipt of a written request
therefor.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4139 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
232P15

#### State v. Edward Durant Hicks

Defs PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA14-1175)

Denied
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FILED
AS PART OF THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       8,257,000
<SECURITIES>                                 2,312,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,394,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,275,000
<PP&E>                                      19,283,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (15,437,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,809,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,552,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    11,152,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   (160,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                34,809,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           109,053,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           106,924,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             539,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,590,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   606,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            984,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   984,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15


</TABLE>
§ 95.767 RCRS transmitter power. Each RCRS transmitter type must be designed such that the transmitter power does not exceed the limits in this section. ( a ) *72 and 75 MHz frequency bands.* For an RCRS transmitter operating in the 72 and/or 75 MHz frequency bands, the mean transmitter output power must not exceed 0.75 Watts.
( b ) *26-28 MHz frequency band.* For an RCRS transmitter operating on 27.255 MHz, the mean transmitter output power must not exceed 25 Watts. For an RCRS transmitter operating on 26.995, 27.045, 27.095, 27.145, or 27.195 MHz, the mean transmitter output power must not exceed 4 Watts.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of United American Healthcare Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Stephen D. Harris, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.

Dated: September 4, 2008


                                        By: /s/ Stephen D. Harris
                                            ------------------------------------
                                        Executive Vice President and Chief
                                        Financial Officer
                                        (principal financial officer)
CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
 OF
        TITLE
        18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE
 
 as
        adopted pursuant to
 
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I,
        Ronald
        D. Sloan, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of Can-Cal
        Resources Ltd., certify that (i) the Quarterly Report onForm 10-QSB for the
        quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed by the Company withthe Securities and
        Exchange Commission, to which this Certification is anExhibit, fully complies
        with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934,
        as
        amended; and (ii) the information containedin the Form 10-QSB financial
        statements fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition
        and
        results of operations of Can-CalResources Ltd.
 
 /s/ Ronald
                D.
                SloanRonald
                  D. Sloan,
                President,
                  Chief Executive Officer
                and
                  Chief Financial Officer
                
                Date:
                  August 19, 2008
  This
        certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company
        forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
        amended.
  A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided
        to
        Can-Cal Resources Ltd. and will be retained by Can-Cal ResourcesLtd. and
        furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
        uponrequest.
§ 95.991 CBRS marketing limitations. Marketing of devices that could be used with CBRS stations resulting in violation of the rules in this part is prohibited. ( a ) *External radio frequency power amplifiers.* No person shall manufacture, import, sell or offer for sale any external radio frequency power amplifier capable of operation below 144 MHz and intended for use in the CBRS. *See* § 2.815 of this chapter.
( b ) *External frequency determining devices.* No person shall manufacture, import, sell or offer for sale, any add-on device, whether internal or external, the function of which is to extend the transmitting frequency capability of a CBRS transmitter beyond that allowed by §§ 95.963 and 95.965.
### THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

Post Office Box 12248

Austin, Texas 78711

(512) 463-1312

May 15, 2015

Mr. Robert B. Dubose

Alexander Dubose Jefferson & Townsend LLP

1844 Harvard Street

Houston, TX 77008

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * Ms. Macey Reasoner Stokes

Baker Botts LLP

910 Louisiana Street, One Shell Plaza

Houston, TX 77002-4995

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case Number: 13-0552

Court of Appeals Number: 01-11-00201-CV

Trial Court Number: 0965221

Style: SHELL OIL COMPANY AND SHELL INTERNATIONAL, E&P, INC.

v.

ROBERT WRITT

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas issued an opinion and judgment in the abovereferenced cause. You may obtain a copy of the opinion and judgment through Case Search on

our Court’s webpage at: http://www.txcourts.gov/supreme.aspx

. On the Case Search page

simply enter the case number and push the Search button to find the docket page for your case.

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

cc: Kenneth David Hughes (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mr. James C. Ho (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mr. Chris Daniel (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Michael Mukasey (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mr. Christopher Prine (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)
<TABLE> <S> <C>



          <ARTICLE> 5

                    <LEGEND>  
                    THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
                    EXTRACTED FROM  AMERICAN ECO CORPORATION'S FORM 10-K
                    FOR THE YEAR ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED
                    IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
                    STATEMENTS. 
                    </LEGEND>        
                            
                    <S>                                  <C>
                    <MULTIPLIER>                       1000
                    <PERIOD-TYPE>     YEAR
                    <FISCAL-YEAR-END>           NOV-30-1996
                    <PERIOD-END>                NOV-30-1996
                    <CASH>                              497
                    <SECURITIES>                          0
                    <RECEIVABLES>                    27,959
                    <ALLOWANCES>                      (346)
                    <INVENTORY>                       6,807
                    <CURRENT-ASSETS>                 44,255
                    <PP&E>                           41,429
                    <DEPRECIATION>                   (8,191)                    <TOTAL-ASSETS>                  104,484
                    <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            40,975
                    <BONDS>                             102
                    <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
                    <PREFERRED>                           0
                    <COMMON>                         39,411
                    <OTHER-SE>                       15,632
                    <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    104,484
                    <SALES>                               0
                    <TOTAL-REVENUES>                119,529
                    <CGS>                                 0
                    <TOTAL-COSTS>                   107,819
                    <OTHER-EXPENSES>                  2,009
                    <LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
                    <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                1,747
                    <INCOME-PRETAX>                   7,954
                    <INCOME-TAX>                       (809)
                    <INCOME-CONTINUING>                8,763
                    <DISCONTINUED>                         0
                    <EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
                    <CHANGES>                              0
                    <NET-INCOME>                       8,763
                    <EPS-PRIMARY>                       0.81
                    <EPS-DILUTED>                        0
                             


</TABLE>
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration

June 19,2015 Office of the Chief Counsel Enforcement Division

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1000 Federal Aviation Administration 600 Independence Avenue SW Washington, DC 20591 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE RE: In the Matter ofSkyWest Airlines, Inc., FAA Case No. 2012NM060025, DMS No. FAA-2013-0292 BOO Independence Ave., SW. Washington, DC 20591 

# RECEIVED JUN 1. 2015 HEARING DOCKET

Please be advised that, henceforth, I am the attorney ofrecord for the Complainant inthe above-referenced matter. Accordingly, copies ofall documents to be served should be sent to me atthe following address: Enforcement Division, AGC-300 Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 Fax: (202) 267-5106 Thankyou for your attention to this matter.

# s~ CaseyE. GarJer, torney Enforcement Divisi n, AGC-300 Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Federal Aviation Administration Telephone: (202) 267-5964CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this date I have sent the foregoing entry ofappearance by facsimile andby U.S. certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, to: Todd Emerson, Esq. Sky West Airlines, Inc. 444 SouthRiver Road St. George, UT 84790 Fax: 435-634-3505 In addition, I certify that I have onthis date personally deliveredthe original and one copy ofthe foregoing documentto: Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl000 Federal Aviation Administration 600 Independence Avenue SW Washington, DC 20591

Dated: June 19, 2015 2
#### § 25.56 Enforcement.

Permits issued or used for entrance onto Entrance Fee Areas are nontransferable. Failure to pay the entrance fee, to display upon request of an authorized official a valid permit, or to comply with other entrance fee provisions, rules or regulations, will be subject to the penalties prescribed in 50 CFR 28.31.