alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
accompanying financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001083848
<NAME> CAN-CAL RESOURCES LTD.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         274,200
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,600
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               330,400
<PP&E>                                          75,100
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,145,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          216,500
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,880
<OTHER-SE>                                     887,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,145,200
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  253,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (227,600)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (227,600)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)






</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 182 (Wednesday, September 20, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 54978]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7795]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE.

International Trade Administration

A-570-893


Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the People's Republic of 
China: Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of the 2004/2005 
Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 20, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Javier Barrientos, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office 9, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2243.

Background

    On June 27, 2006, the Department of Commerce (``the Department'') 
issued the preliminary results of this new shipper review. See Certain 
Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the People's Republic of China: 
Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review, 71 FR 
38368 (July 6, 2006) (``Preliminary Results'').

Extension of Time Limits for Final Results

    Section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 
Act), and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(1) require the Department to issue the 
preliminary results of a new shipper review within 180 days after the 
date on which the new shipper review was initiated and final results of 
a review within 90 days after the date on which the preliminary results 
were issued. The Department may, however, extend the deadline for 
completion of the final results of a new shipper review to 150 days if 
it determines that the case is extraordinarily complicated. See section 
751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(2).
    In order to allow parties additional time to submit comments 
regarding the Department's Preliminary Results, the Department extended 
the deadline for the submission of case and rebuttal briefs by 48 days. 
As a result of the extensions and the extraordinarily complicated 
issues raised in this review segment, including surrogate valuation and 
bona fides issues, it is not practicable to complete this new shipper 
review within the current time limit. Accordingly, the Department is 
extending the time limit for the completion of the final results by 60 
days untilNovember 24, 2006, in accordance with section 
751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(2).
    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: September 13, 2006.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 06-7795 Filed 09-19-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
No. 11-10157.

#### Cetera *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Official websites use.gov****.gov**

**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS 	A lock****https:**

Officers' salute during the National Peace Officers' Memorial Service

Philadelphia Police Officers' salute the flag

San Diego County Sheriffs

Clinton Township Police Honor Guard

Pennsylvania State Police Troopers

Vice President Mike Pence offers remarks during the National Peace Officers' Memorial Service

Onlookers console each other during the ceremony

Jacksonville Sheriffs

Blount County Sheriffs stand with others during the National Peace Officers' Memorial Service

President Donald Trump addresses the crowd

Thousands of people attend the National Peace Officers' Memorial Service on the lawn of the U.S. Capitol

Orlando Police Department Honor Guard

Officers' stand near a commemorative wreath

Onlookers console each other during the ceremony

# SPOTLIGHT

SUBSCRIBE TO EMAIL UPDATES

SUBSCRIBE TO CP DISPATCH

#### ABOUT

                    - Contact COPS
                    - Community Policing in Action: Photo Contest
                    - The L. Anthony Sutin Award for Innovative Law Enforcement and Community Partnerships
                    - Photo Galleries
                    - Subscribe

#### NEWS

                    - Press Releases
                    - Executive Order on Safe Policing for Safer Communities 

#### GRANTS

                    - Compliance & Reporting
                    - Program Documents
                    - Grantees
                    - Grantee Success Stories
                    - Agency Portal Video Tutorials
                    - Award Announcement Map

#### RESOURCES

                    - National Blue Alert Network
                    - Recent Releases
                    - Resource Center/Publications
                    - E-Newsletter: Community Policing Dispatch
                    - Podcast Series: The Beat
                    - Video Series: What’s New in Blue
                    - Tribal Community Policing Resources
                    - Addressing Human Trafficking
                    - Community Policing Topics
                    - Recruitment, Hiring & Retention

#### TRAINING & TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE

                      - Collaborative Reform Initiative for Technical Assistance Center
                      - COPS Training Portal
                      - Training

#### ACCOUNT ACCESS

#### ACCESSIBILITY INFORMATION

FOIALanguage Access PlanLegal Policies and DisclaimersNo Fear ActOpen GovernmentPlain WritingPrivacy PolicyUSA.govWhistleblower ProtectionSocial MediaDepartment of JusticeAccessibility
Exhibit 10.2
IBM EXCESS 401(k) PLUS PLAN
(As Amended and Restated effective as of January 1, 2010)
AMENDMENT No. 10
Instrument of Amendment
Recitals:
International Business Machines Corporation (“IBM”) has established and maintains the IBM Excess 401(k) Plus Plan (the “Plan”), an unfunded deferred compensation plan described in Sections 201(2), 301(a)(3) and 401(a)(1) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA).
In accordance with Section 10.01 of the Plan, IBM has reserved the right to amend the Plan at any time and from time to time.
IBM amended and restated the Plan effective as of January 1, 2010 and has subsequently amended the Plan.
IBM has determined to amend the Plan, as heretofore restated, in the manner set forth in this Instrument of Amendment, to be effective January 1, 2020.
Amendment:
In Article II (“Definitions”), the definition of “Company Contribution-Eligible Individual” is amended by:
a.          adding the following new subsection (f) immediately following existing subsection (e) thereof:
(f)        Effective for transfers occurring on or after January 1, 2020, the individual terminates employment with the Company during the Plan Year due to transfer of employment from the Company directly to an Affiliate (as defined in the 401(k) Plan) that is not a participating employer in the Plan.
b.         modifying the final paragraph thereof to read as follows:
An individual shall not be a Company Contribution-Eligible individual for a Plan Year if the individual terminates employment with the Company prior to December 15 of the Plan Year for any reason not described in the foregoing provisions of this Section, or if the individual is receiving LTD Benefits on December 15 of the Plan Year and did not satisfy the age and/or service requirements for Retirement on the date such benefits commence.  Notwithstanding any other provision of this Section, if an individual terminates employment with the Company before December 15 of a Plan Year for a reason not described in the foregoing provisions of this Section and is rehired by the
​

1



Company later in the Plan Year, the individual shall be a Company Contribution-Eligible Individual for the Plan Year only for Company Contributions to which the individual is entitled for periods of service following the date of rehire, and only to the extent the individual otherwise qualifies for Company Contributions pursuant to this Section.  For the avoidance of doubt, the individual would not be entitled to Company Contributions for the remainder of the Plan Year following the date of rehire if the individual’s termination was a 409A Separation from Service.

2
§ 218.86 Letters of Authorization. ( a ) To incidentally take marine mammals pursuant to the regulations in this subpart, the Navy must apply for and obtain Letters of Authorization (LOAs) in accordance with § 216.106 of this chapter.
( b ) LOAs, unless suspended or revoked, may be effective for a period of time not to exceed the expiration date of the regulations in this subpart.
( c ) If an LOA expires prior to the expiration date of the regulations in this subpart, the Navy may apply for and obtain a renewal of the LOA.
( d ) In the event of projected changes to the activity or to mitigation, monitoring, or reporting (excluding changes made pursuant to the adaptive management provision of § 218.87(c)(1) as required by an LOA issued under this subpart, the Navy must apply for and obtain a modification of the LOA as described in § 218.87.
( e ) Each LOA will set forth: ( 1 ) Permissible methods of incidental taking;
( 2 ) Specified geographic areas for incidental taking;
( 3 ) Means of effecting the least practicable adverse impact (*i.e.,* mitigation) on the species or stocks of marine mammals and their habitat; and
( 4 ) Requirements for monitoring and reporting.
( f ) Issuance of the LOA(s) will be based on a determination that the level of taking must be consistent with the findings made for the total taking allowable under the regulations in this subpart.
( g ) Notice of issuance or denial of the LOA(s) will be published in the Federal Register within 30 days of a determination.
Editorial Note on Part 74
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 74 appear at 64 FR 4055, Jan. 27, 1999.

§ 74.737 Antenna location. ( a ) An applicant for a new low power TV or TV translator station or for a change in the facilities of an authorized station shall endeavor to select a site that will provide a line-of-sight transmission path to the entire area intended to be served and at which there is available a suitable signal from the primary station, if any, that will be retransmitted.
( b ) The transmitting antenna should be placed above growing vegetation and trees lying in the direction of the area intended to be served, to minimize the possibility of signal absorption by foliage.
( c ) A site within 8 kilometers of the area intended to be served is to be preferred if the conditions in paragraph (a) of this section can be met.
( d ) Consideration should be given to the accessibility of the site at all seasons of the year and to the availability of facilities for the maintenance and operation of the transmitting equipment.
( e ) The transmitting antenna should be located as near as is practical to the transmitter to avoid the use of long transmission lines and the associated power losses.
( f ) Consideration should be given to the existence of strong radio frequency fields from other transmitters at the site of the transmitting equipment and the possibility that such fields may result in the retransmissions of signals originating on frequencies other than that of the primary station being rebroadcast.
[88 FR 30669, May 12, 2023]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7309

KENNETH BRIAN JOYNER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District

Judge. (CA-01-1189-AM)

Submitted: December 19, 2003 Decided: February 25, 2004

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Brian Joyner, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Eldridge Jeffrey,

III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond,

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Brian Joyner seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a

habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Joyner has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny Joyner’s motions for a certificate of

appealability, appointment of counsel and an extension of time to

file unspecified pleadings, and we dismiss the appeal. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
#### § 18.79 Inspection and copying of documents.

Any document in a file pertaining to any hearing authorized by this subpart or any document forming part of the record of such a hearing may be inspected and/or copied in the Office of the Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC 20240, unless the file is in the care and custody of the presiding officer, in which case he shall notify the parties as to where and when the record may be inspected.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           Section 1350 Certification

         In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  SUNRISE  REAL  ESTATE
DEVELOPMENT  GROUP,  INC.  (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned  Chief Executive  Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operation of the Company.




 /s/ Lin, Chi-Jung
-------------------------------
Lin, Chi-Jung
Chief Executive Officer


 /s/ Lo, Yi-Yun
-------------------------------
Lo, Yi-Yun
Principal Financial Officer and
Chief Accounting Officer
Case 16-25906 Doc 8 Filed 08/16/16 Entered 08/17/16 09:31:29 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
Sanitized Copy

Sanitized Copy Attachment 1 Chemical ID Method
EXHIBIT 99.1


              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
                      OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


     I, Ronald D. Sloan, the chief executive officer of Can-Cal Resources Ltd.,
certify that the Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended
March 31, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form
10-QSB/A financial statements fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Can-Cal Resources Ltd.

                                              /s/  Ronald D. Sloan
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Ronald D. Sloan,
                                            Chief Executive Officer

                                            Date:  October 3, 2002


<PAGE>





              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
                      OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


I, Ronald D. Sloan, the chief financial officer of Can-Cal Resources Ltd.,
certify that the Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended
March 31, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form
10-QSB/A financial statements fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Can-Cal Resources Ltd.

                                              /s/  Ronald D. Sloan
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Ronald D. Sloan,
                                            Chief Financial Officer

                                            Date:  October 3, 2002
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1632/2005

of 6 October 2005         

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of 21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 7 October 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 October 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 386/2005 (OJ L 62, 9.3.2005, p. 3).

----

ANNEX

to Commission Regulation of 6 October 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

----

(1)  Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 750/2005 (OJ L 126, 19.5.2005, p. 12). Code ‘            999            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

----
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

September 14, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00187

- CV

WIGGINS REVOCABLE TRUST

,

Appellant

v.

Jeffrey A. GLOVER and Donna S. Glover,

Appellees

From the 218th Jud icial District Court, Karnes County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16

- 01

- 00022

- CVK Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The appellant ’ s unopposed motion for extension of time to file reply briefs is hereby GRANTED. Time is extended to October 10, 2018.

_____________________ ____________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 14th day of September, 2018

.

_____________________ ______________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5079 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5079

 To amend the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 to authorize appropriations 
  for fiscal years 1995, 1996, and 1997 for drug abuse education and 
                  prevention for the benefit of youth.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 22, 1994

 Mr. Martinez introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 to authorize appropriations 
  for fiscal years 1995, 1996, and 1997 for drug abuse education and 
                  prevention for the benefit of youth.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DRUG EDUCATION AND PREVENTION RELATING TO YOUTH GANGS.

    Section 3505 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 (42 U.S.C. 11805) 
is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$16,000,000 for fiscal year 1992 and'', 
        and
            (2) by striking ``1993 and 1994'' and inserting ``1995, 
        1996, and 1997''.

SEC. 2. PROGRAMS FOR RUNAWAY AND HOMELESS YOUTH.

    Section 3513 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 (42 U.S.C. 11823) 
is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$16,000,000 for fiscal year 1992 and'', 
        and
            (2) by striking ``1993 and 1994'' and inserting ``1995, 
        1996, and 1997''.
                                 <all>
```
Case 16-26094 Doc 1 Filed 08/15/16 Entered 08/15/16 11:56:16 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 10
Case 16-26094 Doc 1 Filed 08/15/16 Entered 08/15/16 11:56:16 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 10
Case 16-26094 Doc 1 Filed 08/15/16 Entered 08/15/16 11:56:16 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 10
Case 16-26094 Doc 1 Filed 08/15/16 Entered 08/15/16 11:56:16 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 10
Case 16-26094 Doc 1 Filed 08/15/16 Entered 08/15/16 11:56:16 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 10
Case 16-26094 Doc 1 Filed 08/15/16 Entered 08/15/16 11:56:16 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 10
Case 16-26094 Doc 1 Filed 08/15/16 Entered 08/15/16 11:56:16 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 10
Case 16-26094 Doc 1 Filed 08/15/16 Entered 08/15/16 11:56:16 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 10
Case 16-26094 Doc 1 Filed 08/15/16 Entered 08/15/16 11:56:16 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 10
Case 16-26094 Doc 1 Filed 08/15/16 Entered 08/15/16 11:56:16 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 10