alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 23.63 What factors are considered in making a finding that an animal is bred in captivity? ( a ) *Purpose.* Article VII(4) and (5) of the Treaty provide exemptions that allow for the special treatment of wildlife that was bred in captivity (see §§ 23.41 and 23.46).
( b ) *Definitions.* The following terms apply when determining whether specimens qualify as “bred in captivity”: ( 1 ) A *controlled environment* means one that is actively manipulated for the purpose of producing specimens of a particular species; that has boundaries designed to prevent specimens, including eggs or gametes, from entering or leaving the controlled environment; and has general characteristics that may include artificial housing, waste removal, provision of veterinary care, protection from predators, and artificially supplied food.
( 2 ) *Breeding stock* means an ensemble of captive wildlife used for reproduction.
( c ) *Bred-in-captivity criteria.* For a specimen to qualify as bred in captivity, we must be satisfied that all the following criteria are met: ( 1 ) If reproduction is sexual, the specimen was born to parents that either mated or transferred gametes in a controlled environment.
( 2 ) If reproduction is asexual, the parent was in a controlled environment when development of the offspring began.
( 3 ) The breeding stock meets all of the following criteria: ( i ) Was established in accordance with the provisions of CITES and relevant national laws.
( ii ) Was established in a manner not detrimental to the survival of the species in the wild.
( iii ) Is maintained with only occasional introduction of wild specimens as provided in paragraph (d) of this section.
( iv ) Has consistently produced offspring of second or subsequent generations in a controlled environment, or is managed in a way that has been demonstrated to be capable of reliably producing second-generation offspring and has produced first-generation offspring.
( d ) *Addition of wild specimens.* A very limited number of wild specimens (including eggs or gametes) may be introduced into a breeding stock if all of the following conditions are met (for Appendix-I specimens see also § 23.46(b)(12)): ( 1 ) The specimens were acquired in accordance with the provisions of CITES and relevant national laws.
( 2 ) The specimens were acquired in a manner not detrimental to the survival of the species in the wild.
( 3 ) The specimens were added either to prevent or alleviate deleterious inbreeding, with the number of specimens added as determined by the need for new genetic material, or to dispose of confiscated animals.
§ 218.7 Letters of Authorization. ( a ) To incidentally take marine mammals pursuant to these regulations, the Navy must apply for and obtain an LOA.
( b ) An LOA, unless suspended or revoked, may be effective for a period of time not to exceed the expiration date of these regulations.
( c ) If an LOA expires prior to the expiration date of these regulations, the Navy may apply for and obtain a renewal of the LOA.
( d ) In the event of projected changes to the activity or to mitigation and monitoring measures required by an LOA, the Navy must apply for and obtain a modification of the LOA as described in § 218.8.
( e ) The LOA shall set forth the following information: ( 1 ) Permissible methods of incidental taking;
( 2 ) Means of effecting the least practicable adverse impact (*i.e.,* mitigation) on the species, its habitat, and on the availability of the species for subsistence uses; and
( 3 ) Requirements for monitoring and reporting.
( f ) Issuance of the LOA shall be based on a determination that the level of taking will be consistent with the findings made for the total taking allowable under these regulations.
( g ) Notice of issuance or denial of an LOA shall be published in the Federal Register within 30 days of a determination.
Exhibit 23  Consents of Independent Public Accountants



G. BRAD BECKSTEAD
Certified Public Accountant
                                                330 E. Warm Springs
                                                Las Vegas, NV 89119
                                                       702.528.1984
                                                425.928.2877 (efax)





October 25, 2001


To Whom It May Concern:

The firm of G. Brad Beckstead, CPA, consents to the inclusion of my
report  of October 25, 2001, on the Financial Statements of Emporia
Systems  for  the three months ending September 30,  2001,  in  any
filings  which are necessary now or in the near future to be  filed
with the US Securities and Exchange Commission.

Signed,

/s/ G. Brad Beckstead
----------------------
G. Brad Beckstead, CPA
#### § 28.11 Purpose of regulations.

The regulations in this part govern enforcement, penalty, and procedural requirements for violations of subchapter C of this chapter.

[81 FR 79970, Nov. 14, 2016]
Order filed March 11, 2014.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 01069

- CV

___________ TERRANCE MANN, EVELY N MANN AND MICHAEL H OOPER , Appellant

V.

KENDALL HOME BUILDER S CONSTRUCTION PARTN ERS I LTD , Appellee

On Appeal f

rom the 113th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 321010113



### O R D E R No reporter’s record has been filed in this case. The official court reporter

for the 113th District Court informed this court that appellant s had not made

arr angements for payment for the reporter’s record. On January 6, 2014 , the clerk
of this court notified appellant s that we would consider and decide those issues that
do not require a reporter ’ s record unless appellant, within 15 days of notice,
provided th is court with proof of payment for the record. See T ex. R. App

. P. 37.3(c). Appellant s filed no reply.On January 14, 2014, the clerk’s record was filed. On March 7, 2014, a

supplemental clerk’s record was filed pursuant to this court’s order.

W e order appellant s to file a brief in this appeal on or before April 10,

2014. If appellant s fail to comply with this order, the court will dismiss the appeal
for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
§ 222.503 Prohibitions. ( a ) Any population determined by the Secretary to be an experimental population shall be treated as if it were listed as a threatened species for purposes of establishing protective regulations under section 4(d) of the Act with respect to such population.
( b ) Accordingly, when designating, or revising, an experimental population under section 10(j) of the Act, the Secretary may also exercise his or her authority under section 4(d) of the Act to include protective regulations necessary and advisable to provide for the conservation of such species as part of the special rule for the experimental population. Any protective regulations applicable to the species from which the experimental population was sourced do not apply to the experimental population unless specifically included in the special rule for the experimental population.
#### § 95.501 Scope.

This subpart contains rules that apply only to the Family Radio Service (FRS).
Editorial Note on Part 97
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 97 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 97.13 Restrictions on station location. ( a ) Before placing an amateur station on land of environmental importance or that is significant in American history, architecture or culture, the licensee may be required to take certain actions prescribed by §§ 1.1305-1.1319 of this chapter.
( b ) A station within 1600 m (1 mile) of an FCC monitoring facility must protect that facility from harmful interference. Failure to do so could result in imposition of operating restrictions upon the amateur station pursuant to § 97.121. Geographical coordinates of the facilities that require protection are listed in § 0.121(c) of this chapter.
( c ) Before causing or allowing an amateur station to transmit from any place where the operation of the station could cause human exposure to RF electromagnetic field levels in excess of those allowed under § 1.1310 of this chapter, the licensee is required to take certain actions. ( 1 ) The licensee shall ensure compliance with the Commission's radio frequency exposure requirements in §§ 1.1307(b), 2.1091, and 2.1093 of this chapter, where applicable. In lieu of evaluation with the general population/uncontrolled exposure limits, amateur licensees may evaluate their operation with respect to members of his or her immediate household using the occupational/controlled exposure limits in § 1.1310, provided appropriate training and information has been accessed by the amateur licensee and members of his/her household. RF exposure of other nearby persons who are not members of the amateur licensee's household must be evaluated with respect to the general population/uncontrolled exposure limits. Appropriate methodologies and guidance for evaluating amateur radio service operation is described in the *Office of Engineering and Technology* (*OET*) *Bulletin 65,* Supplement B.
( 2 ) If the routine environmental evaluation indicates that the RF electromagnetic fields could exceed the limits contained in § 1.1310 of this chapter in accessible areas, the licensee must take action to prevent human exposure to such RF electromagnetic fields. Further information on evaluating compliance with these limits can be found in the FCC's OET Bulletin Number 65, “Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields.”
[54 FR 25857, June 20, 1989, as amended at 55 FR 20398, May 16, 1990; 61 FR 41019, Aug. 7, 1996; 62 FR 47963, Sept. 12, 1997; 62 FR 49557, Sept. 22, 1997; 62 FR 61448, Nov. 18, 1997; 63 FR 68978, Dec. 14, 1998; 65 FR 6549, Feb. 10, 2000; 80 FR 53752, Sept. 8, 2015; 85 FR 18151, Apr. 1, 2020]
Order entered April 8, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00635-CR

No. 05-13-01385-CR

No. 05-13-01386-CR

DAARON BUYCKS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 195th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F12-35389-N, F12-33600-N, F12-34766-N

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeals.

On March 4, 2014, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’s 

brief has not been filed. We ADOPT the findings that: (1) appellant desires to pursue the 

appeals; (2) appellant is indigent and represented by court-appointed counsel Julie Woods; (3) 

Ms. Woods’s explanation for the delay in filing appellant’s brief is her workload; and (4) Ms. 

Woods requested thirty days from the March 31, 2014 hearing to file appellant’s brief.

We ORDER appellant to file his brief in these appeals by MAY 2, 2014.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 12-30914 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. PEDRO WARDELL BROWN, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:96-CR-100-1

Before SMITH, PRADO, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Pedro Wardell Brown, federal prisoner # 25032-034, appeals the denial of

a motion to reconsider the denial of motion for a s e n t e n c e reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3 582(c)(2). The Government has filed a brief on the merits a nd does not suggest that the denial o f § 3 582(c)(2) relief i s not properly before us; thus, we address the m e r i t s o f B rown’s arguments. See United States v. Martinez , 496 F.3d 387, 388-89 (5th Cir. 2007). U n i t e d S t a te s C o u rt o f A p p e al s F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D April 5, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 12-30914 Document: 00512199243 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/05/2013No. 12-30914

Brown a r gues that the denial o f the m otion has resulted in an aboveguidelines sentence, because he was initially s e ntenced within the Sentencing Guidelines, but h is sentence i s now above the revised Guidelines. He contends that the district court clearly erred by ignoring h is l a ck of violent infractions in prison, his educational accomplishments, his c lose family ties, a nd the f act that his criminal history category over-represents the seriou s n e s s o f his prior off e n s e s . We review the district court’s decision for abuse of discretion. See United States v. Evans , 587 F.3d 667, 672 (5th Cir. 2009). The district court d etermined t hat Brown was eli g i b l e f o r a reduction in sentence based on Amendment 750 of the Sentencing Guidelines; however, the court c o ncluded that a reduction was not appropriate i n l i g h t o f the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, Brown’s prior criminal history, h is violent conduct during his arrest, the facts surrounding his conviction, and the fact that his sentence has already been reduced pursuant to a prior § 3 582(c)(2) motion. See Dillon v. United States , 130 S. Ct. 2683, 2691 (2010)

. B rown has failed t o show that the district c ourt abused its discretion in denying his § 3582(c)(2) m o t i o n . S ee Evans , 587 F.3d at 672. AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 12-30914 Document: 00512199243 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/05/2013
Editorial Note on Part 300
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 300 appear at 64 FR 44431, Aug. 16, 1999, and at 76 FR 59305, Sept. 26, 2011.

§ 300.92 Relation to other laws. ( a ) Insofar as they are consistent with this part, any other applicable Federal law or regulation, or any applicable law and regulations of the State of Washington or of a treaty Indian tribe with treaty fishing rights in the Fraser River Panel Area (U.S.) will continue to have force and effect in the Fraser River Panel Area (U.S.) with respect to fishing activities addressed herein.
( b ) Any person fishing subject to this subpart is bound by the international boundaries now recognized by the United States within the Fraser River Panel Area (U.S.) described in § 300.91, notwithstanding any dispute or negotiation between the United States and Canada regarding their respective jurisdictions, until such time as different boundaries are published by the United States.
( c ) Any person fishing in the Fraser River Panel Area (U.S.) who also fishes for groundfish in the EEZ should consult Federal regulations at part 663 of this title for applicable requirements, including the requirement that vessels engaged in commercial fishing for groundfish (except commercial passenger vessels) have vessel identification in accordance with § 663.6. Federal regulations governing salmon fishing in the EEZ, which includes a portion of the Fraser River Panel Area (U.S.), are at part 661 of this title. Annual regulatory modifications are published in the Federal Register.
( d ) Except as otherwise provided in this subpart, general provisions governing off-reservation fishing by treaty Indians are found at 25 CFR part 249, subpart A. Additional general and specific provisions governing treaty Indian fisheries are found in regulations and laws promulgated by each treaty Indian tribe for fishermen fishing pursuant to tribal authorization.
( e ) Nothing in this subpart relieves a person from any other applicable requirements lawfully imposed by the United States, the State of Washington, or a treaty Indian tribe.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Peh Chung Lim, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of China Water Group, Inc. (registrant):

2. Based on my
knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: November 17, 2006



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Peh Chung Lim      
|Peh Chung Lim          
|Chief Financial Officer
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration # 10614]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Arizona (FEMA-1660-DR), dated 09/07/2006. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms and Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         07/25/2006 through 08/04/2006. *Effective Date:*
                         09/07/2006. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         11/06/2006.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 09/07/2006, applications for Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:* Pima Pinal The Gila River Indian Community Within Pinal County. The Tohono O'odham Nation Within Pima and Pinal Counties. *The Interest Rates are:* (Percent)Other (including non-profit organizations) with credit available elsewhere
5.000Businesses and non-profit organizations without credit available elsewhere
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 10614. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Herbert L. Mitchell, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 06-7788 Filed 9-19-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
**CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED**
 **PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE**
 **SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002)**
 
 In
connection with the annual report of Lighting Science Group Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, **Michael
N. Lavey** , Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as
an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,
 
 2.  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates
and for the periods expressed in the Report.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Lighting Science Group Corporation and will be retained by Lighting Science
Group Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
 
 Signed on
May 25, 2005
 
 /s/ **Michael
N. Lavey** Michael
N. Lavey ,
 Chief
Financial Officer of
 Lighting
Science Group Corporation
2022 Collaborative Reform Initiative (CRI) Program Awards

State, Organization Name, and Project Type/Title Estimated Award Amount

Virginia

CNA Corporation

Collaborative Reform Initiative: Organizational Assessments $5,000,000

Reprogrammed Funding Awards

Maryland

Jensen Hughes, Inc.

Collaborative Reform Initiative: Critical Response $1,000,000

Virginia

International Association of Chiefs of Police

Collaborative Reform Initiative Technical Assistance Center Continuation $2,327,694

TOTAL FUNDING AWARDED: $8,327,694
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1550/2005

of 22 September 2005         

fixing the maximum export refund on common wheat in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1059/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For tenders notified from 16 to 22 September 2005, pursuant to the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1059/2005, the maximum refund on exportation of common wheat shall be 7,50 EUR/t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 23 September 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 September 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

(2)OJ L 174, 7.7.2005, p. 15.

(3)OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

----