alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Jones Soda Co. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Peter van Stolk, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                      |  |               
|------------------------------------- |  | --------------
|/s/ Peter van Stolk                   |  | August 6, 2004
|Peter van Stolk,                      |  |               
|Chief Executive Officer and President |  |
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

Mercury Interactive (Israel) Limited, incorporated under the laws of Israel

Mercury Interactive (UK) LTD., incorporated under the laws of the United
Kingdom

Mercury Interactive France SARL, incorporated under the laws of France

Mercury Interactive GmbH, incorporated under the laws of Germany

Mercury Interactive (Europe) BV, incorporated under the laws of The Netherlands

Mercury Interactive Canada Inc., incorporated under the laws of Canada

Mercury Interactive Japan K.K., incorporated under the laws of Japan

Mercury Interactive (Australia) Pty Ltd., incorporated under laws of Australia

Mercury Interactive Asia Pte LTD., incorporated under the laws of Singapore

Mercury Interactive (Belgium)--Benelux Branch, registered under the laws of
Belgium

Mercury Interactive Brasil Limitada, incorporated under the laws of Brazil

Mercury Interactive NORDIC AB, incorporated under the laws of Sweden

Mercury Interactive Srl, incorporated under the laws of Italy

Mercury Interactive Aps, incorporated under the laws of Denmark

Mercury Interactive SA (Pty) Ltd., incorporated under the laws of South Africa

Mercury Interactive (China) Limited, incorporated under the laws of Hong Kong

Mercury Interactive B.V., incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands

Conduct Software Technologies, Inc., incorporated under the laws of California

Conduct Ltd., incorporated under the laws of Israel

Quicksilver Interactive Corporation, incorporated under the laws of Delaware
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Stamps.com Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ken McBride, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.





Date:
      November 8, 2010
              
              /s/
      KEN MCBRIDEKen
      McBrideChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Argued and submitted February 25,

affirmed March 23, 1994

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*KENNETH EARL DOTY, *Appellant.*

(92-1591; CA A79337)

870 P2d 868

Steven V. Humber, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.

Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Leeson, Judges.

De MUNIZ, J.

*88De MUNIZ, J.

Defendant appeals the length of the post-prison supervision term imposed after he pled guilty to 10 offenses, pursuant to plea negotiations. The state argues that review is precluded by ORS 138.222(2)(d) as a sentence that resulted from a plea agreement.1 Defendant contends that review is not precluded by *State v. Adams,*315 Or 359, 847 P2d 397 (1993), and *State v. Johnston,*120 Or App 165, 851 P2d 1156, *rev den*317 Or 272 (1993). He argues that since those cases were decided the legislature amended ORS 138.222(2)(d)2 to preclude review of *“a*sentence resulting from a stipulated sentencing agreement” and that there was no such sentence in his case.

We do not address our scope of review. As defendant acknowledges, he did not object to the imposition of the post-prison supervision term. He contends, however, that it is error apparent on the face of the record, because the term exceeds that authorized in OAR 253-05-002. The state contends that defendant’s conviction for sexual abuse comes within ORS 144.103,3 and, therefore, a 10-year term of post-prison supervision on defendant’s convictions for sexual abuse in the first degree was not error.

Defendant’s unpreserved claim of error is not an error of law apparent on the face of the record. We have no discretion to consider it. *Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.,*312 Or 376, 381, 823 P2d 956 (1991); *see also State v. Farmer,*317 Or 220, 856 P2d 623 (1993); *State v. Castrejon,*317 Or 202, 856 P2d 616 (1993).

Affirmed.

1

 The state also argues that review is barred by ORS 138.222(2)(a) as a presumptive sentence. We do not reach that argument.

2

 Or Laws 1993, ch 698, § 1.

3

 When defendant was sentenced, ORS 144.103 provided, in part:

> “Any person sentenced to a term of imprisonment for violating * * * ORS 163.375,163.405,163.408,163.411 or 163.425 shall serve a term of post-prison supervision that shall continue until the term of the post-prison supervision, when added to the term of imprisonment served, equals the maximum statutory indeterminate sentence for the violation.”

Sexual abuse in the first degree was formerly codified at ORS 163.425 and is currently codified at ORS 163.427. Defendant was convicted of, *inter alia,*sexual abuse in the first degree under ORS 163.427. Defendant and the state dispute whether ORS 144.103 applied to his conviction.
Exhibit 99.1


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Capital Preferred Yield Fund-IV, L.P.
(the "Partnership") on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2003,
as filed with the Security and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, John F. Olmstead, President and Director of CAI Equipment Leasing
V Corp., the General Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Partnership.


By:    /s/ John F. Olmstead                            Dated: March 30, 2004
       --------------------
       John F. Olmstead
Title: President and Director
§ 216.73 Disposition of fur seal parts. Except for transfers to other Alaskan Natives for barter or sharing for personal or family consumption, no part of a fur seal taken for subsistence uses may be sold or otherwise transferred to any person unless it is a nonedible byproduct which: ( a ) Has been transformed into an article of handicraft, or
( b ) Is being sent by an Alaskan Native directly, or through a registered agent, to a tannery registered under 50 CFR 216.23(c) for the purpose of processing, and will be returned directly to the Alaskan Native for conversion into an article of handicraft, or
( c ) Is being sold or transferred to an Alaskan Native, or to an agent registered under 50 CFR 216.23(c) for resale or transfer to an Alaskan Native, who will convert the seal part into a handicraft.
[51 FR 24840, July 9, 1986. Redesignated at 61 FR 11750, Mar. 22, 1996]
Exhibit 23.1 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  
  Abraxas Petroleum Corporation
 San Antonio, Texas
  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-127480, 333-132971, 333-143728, 333-162573 and 333-163763) and Form S-8 (No. 333-17375, 333-17377, 033-81416, 333-55691, 333-74592, 333-74614, 333-135032, and 333-162358) of Abraxas Petroleum Corporation of our report dated March 17, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements which appear in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
 
 /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
 
 BDO Seidman, LLP
 Dallas, Texas
  March 17, 2010
  
  
  R-221 (9/08)
§ 21.70 Banding or marking permits. ( a ) *Permit requirement.* A banding or marking permit is required before any person may capture migratory birds for banding or marking purposes or use official bands issued by the Service for banding or marking any migratory bird.
( b ) *Application procedures.* Applications for banding or marking permits shall be submitted by letter of application addressed to the Bird Banding Laboratory, Office of Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Laurel, Maryland 20708. Each such application shall contain the general information and certification set forth by § 13.12(a) of this subchapter plus the following additional information: ( 1 ) Species and numbers proposed to be banded or marked;
( 2 ) Purpose of banding or marking;
( 3 ) State or States in which authorization is requested; and
( 4 ) Name and address of the public, scientific, or educational institution to which any specimens will be donated that are salvaged pursuant to paragraphs (c) (3) and (4) of this section.
( c ) *Additional permit conditions.* In addition to the general conditions set forth in part 13 of this subchapter B, banding or marking permits shall be subject to the following conditions: ( 1 ) The banding of migratory birds shall only be by official numbered leg bands issued by the Service. The use of any other band, clip, dye, or other method of marking is prohibited unless specifically authorized in the permit.
( 2 ) All traps or nets used to capture migratory birds for banding or marking purposes shall have attached thereto a tag or label clearly showing the name and address of the permittee and his permit number, or the area in which such traps or nets are located must be posted with notice of banding operations posters (Forms available upon request from the Bird Banding Laboratory, U.S. Geological Survey, Laurel, MD 20708) which shall bear the name and address of the permittee and the number of his permit.
( 3 ) The holder of a banding or marking permit may salvage, for the purpose of donating to a public scientific or educational institution, birds killed or found dead as a result of the permittee's normal banding operations, and casualties from other causes. All dead birds salvaged under authority of a migratory bird banding or marking permit must be donated and transferred to a public scientific or educational institution at least every 6 months or within 60 days of the time such permit expires or is revoked, unless the permittee has been issued a special permit authorizing possession for a longer period of time.
( 4 ) Permittees must keep accurate records of their operations and file reports as set forth in the North American Bird Banding Manual, or supplements thereto, in accordance with instructions contained therein.
( d ) *Term of permit.* A banding or marking permit issued or renewed under this part expires on the date designated on the face of the permit unless amended or revoked, but the term of the permit shall not exceed three (3) years from the date of issuance or renewal.
[39 FR 1178, Jan. 4, 1974, as amended at 54 FR 38151, Sept. 14, 1989. Redesignated and amended at 87 FR 881, Jan. 7, 2022]
#### TIMOTHY WHITFIELD *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

(AC 19232)

Foti, Mihalakos and Spallone, Js.

Argued April 3

officially released April 25, 2000

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed.
EXHIBIT 11.

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000
(ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST HUNDRED DOLLARS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)





Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                  8,719,709
                                                                 --------------
Common stock equivalents - stock options                                      0
Common stock equivalents - preferred stock                                    0
                                                                 --------------
Average common and common stock equivalents outstanding               8,719,709
                                                                 --------------
Net income (loss)                                                $    (676,100)
                                                                 --------------
Earnings per share(1)                                            $       (0.08)
                                                                 --------------

(1)  Fully diluted earnings per share have not been presented because
     the effects are not material.




                                       20
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0000109 31-DEC-2015 08:50 AM
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 18, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-10557

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ELIZABETH P. JOHNSTON,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:01-CR-246-1-P

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Elizabeth P. Johnston has moved

for leave to withdraw from this appeal and has filed a brief as

required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Johnston

has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not

filed a response.

Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses

no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal. Accordingly, the

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
No. 03-10557

-2-

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
#### 35 Park Avenue, Inc., Respondent, *v.*City of New York, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

May 23, 1969.

*Per Curiam.*

In view of the strong public policy in this State against payment by public bodies of claims barred by the Statute of Limitations (N. Y. Const., art. Ill, § 19; Court of Claims Act, § 12, subd. 2; General City Law, § 20, subd.. 5; Administrative Code of City of New York, § 93d-3.0; *Matter of City of New York [ElmSt.],*239 N. Y. 220, 229; *Matter of Huie [McElligott],*7 A D 2d 599; *Matter of Long Is. R. R.,*174 Misc. 1037, affd. 261 App. Div. 914), we find the acknowledgment of the debt by the city department after the Statute of Limitations had run to be an impermissible waiver of the Statute of Limitations (General City Law, supra; *George C. Diehl, Inc.*v. *City of Lackawanna, 233*App. Div. 348, affd. 258 N. Y. 579). It was therefore error to deny the motion, except .as to the 1961 payment in regard to which the city concedes an issue exists.

Order, insofar as appealed from should be modified by dismissing so much of the complaint as seeks recovery for sums paid in the years 1956 to 1960, and, as modified, should be affirmed, with $10 costs to appellant.

Concur — Streit, J. P., Hofstadter and Gold, JJ.

Order modified, etc.
#### § 14.251 What other regulations may apply?

The provisions of this subpart are in addition to, and are not in place of, other regulations of this subchapter, or other Federal, State, Tribal, or territorial laws or regulations, that may require a permit or describe additional restrictions or conditions for the importation, exportation, transportation, sale, receipt, acquisition, or purchase of any prohibited wildlife species in interstate or foreign commerce, or in a manner substantially affecting interstate or foreign commerce, or breeding of any prohibited wildlife species, or possessing of any prohibited wildlife species.
**Read more of the July Dispatch**
    - The Egg Harbor Township Police: Taking a LEAP Forward with Community Policing
    - Shop Talk: Bridging the Communications Gap between Police and Minority Communities 
    - Frederick Crisis Car Speeds a Multidisciplinary Team to Behavioral Health Calls 
    - Klamath Tribes Establish New Department to Reclaim Role in Public Safety 
    - Sunnyvale Department of Public Safety Hosts Youth Leadership Academy
    - To (Better) Serve and (Better) Protect: The National Law Enforcement Knowledge Lab
#### § 218.31 Effective dates.

Regulations in this subpart are effective from March 25, 2020, through March 25, 2025.
#### § 73.558 Indicating instruments.

The requirements for indicating instruments described in § 73.258 are applicable to all educational FM broadcast stations licensed with a transmitter power greater than 0.01 kw.

[51 FR 17029, May 8, 1986]
----

Berichtigung der Entscheidung 2004/333/EG der Kommission vom 31. März 2004 zur Genehmigung des Inverkehrbringens von gelben Streichfetten, Salatsoßen, milchartigen Erzeugnissen und fermentierten milchartigen Erzeugnissen, Sojagetränken und käseartigen Erzeugnissen mit Phytosterin-/Phytostanolzusatz als neuartige Lebensmittel oder neuartige Lebensmittelzutaten im Sinne der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 258/97 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates

(Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 105 vom 14. April 2004)

Seite 42, Anhang 1, Satz 1:

anstatt:

„mit Ausnahme von aus Butter oder sonstigem tierischem Fett hergestellten Koch- und Bratfetten sowie Streichfetten.“

muss es heißen:

„mit Ausnahme von Koch- und Bratfetten und aus Butter oder sonstigem tierischem Fett hergestellten Streichfetten.“

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

r 

PR 23-0232 

JUN 2 7 2023 

IN RE MOTION FOR ADMISSION UPON UNIFORM 

BAR EXAMINATION SCORE TRANSFER 

Bowen Cif .-enwood Clerk or Supreme court State of Montana 

ORDER 

Elizabeth Mischell Pennock has filed a petition for admission to the State Bar of 

Montana pursuant to Rule IV of the Rules for Admission to the Bar of the State of Montana, 

governing admission upon Uniform Bar Examination score transfer. The Bar Admissions 

Administrator of the State Bar of Montana has informed the Court that the Commission on 

Character and Fitness has certified that Pennock has provided the necessary documentation 

and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission under Rule IV of the Rules for 

Admission to the State Bar of Montana. Therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and 

competition of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions 

Administrator, Elizabeth Mischell Pennock may be sworn in to the practice of law in the 

State of Montana. Arrangements for swearing-in may be made by contacting the office of 

the Clerk of the Montana Supreme Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to the Petitioner and the State 

Bar of Montana. `-r\--. 

DATED this-a day of June, 2023. 

7 1 / 7 

Chief Ju 

/ 

06/27/2023

Case Number: PR 23-0232
Justices
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

JOHN THOMA AND JENNIFER THOMA, HUSBAND AND WIFE,

Respondents

v.

INTERSTATE BUILDERS, RANDOLPH D. DAHL, SR., INDIVIDUALLY AND MERCEDES DAHL, INDIVIDUALLY,

Petitioners :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 164 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 18th day of October, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
§ 101.215 Posting of station authorization and transmitter identification cards, plates, or signs. ( a ) Each licensee shall post at the station the name, address and telephone number of the custodian of the station license or other authorization if such license or authorization is not maintained at the station.
( b ) The requirements in paragraph (a) of this section do not apply to remote stations using frequencies listed in § 101.147(b).
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned is the Chief Financial Officer of China Water Group, Inc.  This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.  This Certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of China Water Group, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2013.

The undersigned certifies that such 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of China Water Group, Inc. as of June 30, 2013.

This Certification is executed as of October 2, 2015.

/s/ Ding Rencai

     Ding Rencai

     Chief Financial Officer
### Request for Information Discov ery Bay Studios (FAA-2015-3409) 9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA)

Dear Mr. Chance: This letter is to inform you that the following information is miss ing from your petition (Docket No. FAA

− 2015

− 3409). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administrati on (FAA) to process your p etition.

 Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s)(i.e., fixed

- wing, rotorcraft, lighter

- than

- air) for the proposed UAS operation. The description(s) should incl ude the maximum weight (i ncluding payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual(s).
Please submit the additional informat ion (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov . Once your information has been submitted, pl ease also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations .gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. I f you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information de scribed above by November 27, 2015. If we do not receive the in formation, we will close the doc ket without notifying you further. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999 . FAA Office of Rulemaking Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2015 11:23 AM To: captainchance@gmail.com
Case 16-26231 Doc 41 Filed 08/25/18 Entered 08/25/18 11:42:37 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 3
Case 16-26231 Doc 41 Filed 08/25/18 Entered 08/25/18 11:42:37 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 3
Case 16-26231 Doc 41 Filed 08/25/18 Entered 08/25/18 11:42:37 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 3