alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1


              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
                      OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


     I, Anthony F. Ciali, the chief executive officer of Can-Cal Resources Ltd.,
certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March
31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form
10-QSB financial statements fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Can-Cal Resources Ltd.



                                              /s/  Anthony F. Ciali
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            ANTHONY F. CIALI,
                                            Chief Executive Officer
                                            Date:  May 14, 2003


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Can-Cal Resources Ltd. and will be retained by Can-Cal Resources
Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



                                       17

<PAGE>



              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
                      OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


     I, Ronald D. Sloan, the chief financial officer of Can-Cal Resources Ltd.,
certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March
31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form
10-QSB financial statements fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Can-Cal Resources Ltd.



                                              /s/  Ronald D. Sloan
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            RONALD D. SLOAN,
                                            Chief Financial Officer
                                            Date:  May 14, 2003


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Can-Cal Resources Ltd. and will be retained by Can-Cal Resources
Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.




                                       18
§ 80.301 Watch requirements. ( a ) Each public coast station licensed to operate in the band 1605-3500 kHz must monitor such frequency(s) as are used for working or, at the licensee's discretion, maintain a watch on 2182 kHz.
( b ) Except for distress, urgency or safety messages, coast stations must not transmit on 2182 kHz during the silence periods for three minutes twice each hour beginning at x h.00 and x h.30 Coordinated Universal Time (UTC).
( c ) Each public coast station must provide assistance for distress communications when requested by the Coast Guard.
[51 FR 31213, Sept. 2, 1986, as amended at 69 FR 64673, Nov. 8, 2004]
Opinion issued December 21, 2023

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 2 3
- 00 574
- CV

——————————— TAREK ALI AND MOHAMED FARGHALY , Appellant s V. ROLA SALAH , Appellee

On Appeal from the 24 6 th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 20 19
- 40543

MEMORANDUM OPINION On August 7 , 202 3 , appellant, Tarek Ali , filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s May 2 3, 202 3 final judgment in the divorce proceeding between Ali and appellee, Rola Salah

. On August 11, 2023, appellant, Mohamed Farghaly, an intervenor in the divorce proceeding between Ali and Salah, filed a notice of appeal2

from the trial court’s May 23, 2023 final judgment. On September 7 , 2023, the Court abated this appeal and referred the appeal to mediation. On November 28 , 2023, appellants filed a “Joint Motion to Dimiss Appeal [] .” In their motion, appellants stated that the “parties attended mediation, settled the case and resolved a ll issues as to all parties.” Accordingly, appellants “request[ed] that this [C]ourt dismiss th [eir] appeal,” and that “the costs of the appeal are to be taxed against the [a]ppellants.”
No other party has filed a notice of appeal , and no opinion has issued. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 42.1 (a)(2), (c). Appellants’ motion does not include a certificate of conference stating that appellants conferred, or made a reasonable attempt to confer, with Sal ah regarding the relief requested in the motion. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P

. 10.1(a)(5). However, more than ten days have passed, and no party has expressed opposition to appellants’ motion. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P

. 10.3(a)(2). Accordingly, we reinstate the appeal o n the Court’s active docket, grant appellants’ motion , and dismiss the appeal

. See T EX
. R. A PP . P. 42.1(a) ( 1 ), 43.2( f )

. We dismiss all other pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Hightower, and Guerra

.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-2020

CARLOS HUMBERTO GOMEZ-VASQUEZ,

Petitioner,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: March 8, 2018 Decided: March 28, 2018

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sean R. Hanover, HANOVER LAW, PC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Petitioner. Chad A. 

Readler, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Terri J. Scadron, Assistant Director, Siu P. 

Wong, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF 

JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Carlos Humberto Gomez-Vasquez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for 

review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal 

from the immigration judge’s denial of his requests for withholding of removal and 

protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have thoroughly reviewed 

the record, including the transcript of the merits hearing and all supporting evidence. We 

conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the 

administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012) and that substantial 

evidence supports the Board’s decision, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 

(1992).*

 

We therefore deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. In re 

Gomez-Vasquez (B.I.A. Aug. 1, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

 * Gomez-Vasquez has waived review of the denial of protection under the CAT 

because he does not raise the issue in the argument section of his brief. United States v. 

Holness, 706 F.3d 579, 592 (4th Cir. 2013) (noting the “oft-cited rule that contentions not 

raised in the argument section of the opening brief are abandoned” (internal quotation 

marks omitted)); Snyder v. Phelps, 580 F.3d 206, 217 (4th Cir. 2009) (noting that an 

appellant “must raise in its opening brief all the issues it wishes the court to address” and 

concluding that an appellant waived contentions not briefed (internal quotation marks 

omitted)).
BOB GOODLATTE, Virginia
‘CHAIRMAN

F, JAMES SENSENBRENNER, JR., Wisconsin
LAMAR S. SMITH, Texas
‘STEVE CHABOT, Ohio
DARRELL E. ISSA, California
STEVE KING, lowa

TRENT FRANKS, Arizona
LOUIE GOHMERT, Texas
JIM JORDAN, Ohio

TED POE, Texas

TOM MARINO, Pennsylvania
‘TREY GOWDY, South Carolina
RAUL R. LABRADOR, Idaho
BLAKE FARENTHOLD, Texas
DOUG COLLINS, Georgia
RON DESANTIS, Florida
KEN BUCK, Colorado

JOHN RATCLIFFE, Texas
MARTHA ROBY, Alabama
MATT GAETZ, Florida

MIKE JOHNSON, Louisiana
ANDY BIGGS, Arizona
JOHN RUTHERFORD, Florida
KAREN HANDEL, Georgia

ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS.

Congress of the Wnited States
House of Representatives

COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY
2138 RaYBURN House OFFICE BUILDING
WasuincTon, DC 20515-6216
(202) 225-3951

http:/iwww.house.govijudiciary

October 10, 2017

The Honorable Karen Haas
Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives
U.S. Capitol, Room H154

Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Madam Clerk,

JOHN CONYERS, JR., Michigan
RANKING MEMBER

JERROLD NADLER, New York
ZOE LOFGREN, California

SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas

STEVE COHEN, Tennessee

HENRY C. “HANK” JOHNSON, JR., Georgia
TED DEUTCH, Florida

LUIS V. GUTIERREZ, Illinois

KAREN BASS, California

CEDRIC L. RICHMOND, Louisiana

HAKEEM S. JEFFRIES, New York

DAVID CICILLINE, Rhode Island

ERIC SWALWELL, California

TED LIEU, California

JAMIE RASKIN, Maryland

PRAMILA JAYAPAL, Washington

BRAD SCHNEIDER, Illinois

Pursuant to section 3(c) of House Resolution 5 (114" Congress), I hereby designate the attached
Memorial from the State of Nevada, received by the House of Representatives in the year 1980, as
purporting to be an application of the State legislature calling for a convention for proposing amendments
to the Constitution of the United States pursuant to Article V, and request that you make it publicly

available.

Sincerely,

feat Poodle

Bob Goodlatte
Chairman


STATE OF NEVADA
DEPARTMENT OF STATE

339
I, WM. D. SWACKHAMER, the duly qualified and elected Secretary of State of the State of Nevada, do hereby
certify that the annexed is a true, full and correct copy of Senate Joint

Resolution No. 8 of the 60th session of the Nevada legislature,
now on file and of record in this office.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand

and affixed the Great Seal of State, at my office, in

Carson City, Nevada, this. 18th -day of

1598 Be

Form AA 37
§ 54.803 Rural Digital Opportunity Fund provider eligibility. ( a ) Any eligible telecommunications carrier is eligible to receive Rural Digital Opportunity Fund support in eligible areas.
( b ) An entity may obtain eligible telecommunications carrier designation after public notice of winning bidders in the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund auction.
( c ) To the extent any entity seeks eligible telecommunications carrier designation prior to public notice of winning bidders for Rural Digital Opportunity Fund support, its designation as an eligible telecommunications carrier may be conditioned subject to receipt of Rural Digital Opportunity Fund support.
( d ) Any Connect America Phase II auction participant that defaulted on all of its Connect America Phase II auction winning bids is barred from participating in the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1525/2005

of 20 September 2005         

fixing the export refunds on eggs applicable from 21 September 2005         

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2771/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common organisation of the market in eggs (1), and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 8(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The codes of products for which, when they are exported, the export refund referred to in Article 8 of Regulation (EEC) No 2771/75 is granted and the amount of that refund shall be as shown in the Annex hereto.

However, in order to qualify for the refund, products falling within the scope of Chapter XI of the Annex to Directive 89/437/EEC must also satisfy the health marking conditions laid down in that Directive.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 21 September 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 September 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 282, 1.11.1975, p. 49. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 806/2003 (OJ L 122, 16.5.2003, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 102, 17.4.1999, p. 11. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 671/2004 (OJ L 105, 14.4.2004, p. 5).

(3)OJ L 212, 22.7.1989, p. 87. Directive as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 806/2003.

----

ANNEX

Export refunds on eggs applicable from 21 September 2005

----
§ 217.217 Renewals and modifications of Letters of Authorization. ( a ) An LOA issued under §§ 216.106 of this chapter and 217.216 for the activity identified in § 217.210(a) shall be renewed or modified upon request by the applicant, provided that: ( 1 ) The planned specified activity and mitigation, monitoring, and reporting measures, as well as the anticipated impacts, are the same as those described and analyzed for these regulations; and
( 2 ) NMFS determines that the mitigation, monitoring, and reporting measures required by the previous LOA under these regulations were implemented.
( b ) For LOA modification or renewal requests by the applicant that include changes to the activity or the mitigation, monitoring, or reporting that do not change the findings made for the regulations or result in no more than a minor change in the total estimated number of takes (or distribution by species or years), NMFS may publish a notice of proposed LOA in the Federal Register, including the associated analysis of the change, and solicit public comment before issuing the LOA.
( c ) An LOA issued under §§ 216.106 of this chapter and 217.216 for the activity identified in § 217.210(a) may be modified by NMFS under the following circumstances: ( 1 ) HRCP may modify (including augment) the existing mitigation, monitoring, or reporting measures (after consulting with NMFS regarding the practicability of the modifications) if doing so creates a reasonable likelihood of more effectively accomplishing the goals of the mitigation and monitoring set forth in the preamble for these regulations; ( i ) Possible sources of data that could contribute to the decision to modify the mitigation, monitoring, or reporting measures in a LOA: ( A ) Results from HRCP's monitoring from previous years;
( B ) Results from other marine mammal and/or sound research or studies; and
( C ) Any information that reveals marine mammals may have been taken in a manner, extent or number not authorized by these regulations or subsequent LOAs;
( ii ) If, through adaptive management, the modifications to the mitigation, monitoring, or reporting measures are substantial, NMFS will publish a notice of proposed LOA in the Federal Register and solicit public comment.
( 2 ) If NMFS determines that an emergency exists that poses a significant risk to the well-being of the species or stocks of marine mammals specified in a LOA issued pursuant to §§ 216.106 of this chapter and 217.216, a LOA may be modified without prior notice or opportunity for public comment. Notice would be published in the Federal Register within thirty days of the action.
Exhibit 32
                        SOUTHCOAST FINANCIAL CORPORATION

                CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


The  undersigned,  who are the chief  executive  officer and the chief financial
officer of Southcoast Financial Corporation,  each hereby certifies that, to the
best of his knowledge,  the accompanying  Form 10-Q of the issuer fully complies
with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934, and that information  contained in the report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
issuer.




Date:    May 8, 2009                     /s/ L. Wayne Pearson
         -----------                     -----------------------------------
                                         L. Wayne Pearson
                                         Chief Executive Officer




                                         /s/ William C. Heslop
                                         ------------------------------------
                                         William C. Heslop
                                         Chief Financial Officer
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

LARRY DONELL BROWN, )

DOC #T90380, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D16-1941

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed August 31, 2018. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Samantha L. 

Ward, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender,

and Mark J. O'Brien, Special Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Jason M. Miller, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa 

(withdrew after briefing); Andrew 

Tetreault, Assistant Attorney General, 

Tampa (substituted as counsel of 

record), for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, BLACK, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur. 
- 2 -
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.2

 Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I, Tony Shahbaz, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of I/OMagic Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) [language omitted pursuant to SEC
Release 34-47986] for the registrant and have:

         a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b) [omitted pursuant to SEC Release 34-47986];

         c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


Date:   August 18, 2006

/s/  Tony Shahbaz
-------------------------------
Tony Shahbaz,
Interim Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)
H. R. 4812

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four

An Act

To direct the Administrator of General Services to acquire by transfer the Old

U.S. Mint in San Francisco, California, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OLD U.S. MINT, SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA.

Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this

Act, the Administrator of General Services shall take such actions

as may be necessary to acquire by transfer, without consideration,

the property referred to as the ‘‘Old U.S. Mint’’, located at Fifth

and Mission Streets in San Francisco, California, together with

any improvements, structures, and fixtures located on the property.

SEC. 2. REPAIRS OF OLD U.S. MINT, SAN FRANCISCO.

Nothing in this Act shall be construed to force the General

Services Administration to repair the Old U.S. Mint building prior

to repairs to other Federal buildings in greater need of repair.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
§ 90.913 Record maintenance and definitions. ( a ) *Records maintenance.* All winning bidders qualifying as small or very small businesses, shall maintain at their principal place of business an updated file of ownership, revenue and asset information, including any document necessary to establish eligibility as a small or very small business, as defined in § 90.912, and/or consortium of small businesses (or consortium of very small businesses). Licensees (and their successors in interest) shall maintain such files for the term of the license.
( b ) *Definitions.* The terms *small and very small business* used in this section are defined in § 90.912.
[68 FR 43001, July 21, 2003]
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Source Direct Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Dated:  February 19, 2008

/s/ Deren Z. Smith

Name: Deren Z. Smith

Title:  Chief Executive Officer



Dated:  February 19, 2008

/s/ Kevin Arave

Name: Kevin Arave

Title:  Chief Financial Officer