alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Evidence Table 7.  What is the effect of mitomycin-C on intraocular pressure control after combined cataract and glaucoma surgery?

								Outcomes/Benefits

Study design: Randomized controlled trials

Carlson, Alward, Barad et al., 1997

United States

Followup: 12 to 23 months

Quality: 79%	1	14	0.00	0	0.5 mg/ml 3-3.9 minutes	Phaco.

1-site	-5.80	NR	NR	NR	NR	0

	2	15	0.06	0	Placebo	Phaco.

1-site	-2.90	NR	NR	NR	NR	5

Cohen, Greff, Novack et al., 1996

United States

Followup: 12 to 23 months

Quality: 69%	1	36	0.19	0	0.5 mg/ml 2-2.9 minutes	Phaco.

Scleral

1-site	-7.70	NR	NR	NR	0.60	NR

	2	35	0.17	0	Placebo	Phaco.

Scleral

1-site	-3.1	NR	NR	NR	1.4	NR

Lemon, Shin, Kim et al., 1998

United States

Followup: Not Reported

Quality: 66%	1	30	0.70	0	0.5 mg/ml 1-1.9 minute	Phaco.

1-site	-3.30	NR	NR	NR	1.40	NR

	2	39	0.56	0	0.5 mg/ml 1-1.9 minute	Phaco.

1-site	-3.40	NR	NR	NR	1.30	NR

Shin, Kim, Sheth et al., 1998

United States

Followup: ≥ 24 months

Quality: 53%	1	21	0.81	NR	0.5 mg/ml 1-1.9 minute	Phaco.	NR	NR	NR	NR	NR	NR

	2	28	0.50	NR	None given	Phaco.

1-site	NR	NR	NR	NR	NR	NR

Shin, Ren, Juzych et al., 1998

United States

Followup: ≥ 24 months

Quality: 78%	1	NR	NR	0	None given	Phaco.

1-site	NR	NR	NR	NR	NR	NR

	2	NR	NR	0	0.5 mg/ml Can't Tell	Phaco.

1-site	NR	NR	NR	NR	NR	NR

Shin, Kim, Ren et al., 1998

United States

Followup: ≥ 24 months

Quality: 78%	1	81	0.53	0	0.5 mg/ml Can't Tell	Phaco.

Scleral

1-site	NR	NR	NR	NR	NR	NR

	2	93	0.46	0	None given	Phaco.

Scleral

1-site	NR	NR	NR	NR	NR	NR

Study design: Cohort studies

Budenz, Pyfer, Singh et al., 1999

United States

Followup: 12 to 23 months

Quality: 58%	1	21	0.38	0	None given	Phaco.

1-site	-3.4	NR	NR	NR	0.7	NR

	2	28	0.46	0	None given	Phaco.

1-site	-3.7	NR	NR	NR	1.1	NR

	3	29	0.28	NR	Can't Tell Can't Tell	Phaco.

1-site	-4.60	NR	NR	NR	0.40	NR

Liu, Su, Chou et al., 2000

Taiwan

Followup: 12 to 23 months

Quality: 63%	1	22	NR	0	0.2 mg/ml 3-3.9 minutes	Phaco.

1-site	-5.16	NR	NR	NR	0.18	NR

	2	18	NR	0	None given	Phaco.

1-site	-4.12	NR	NR	NR	0.72	NR

Study design: Case-control studies

El-Sayyad, Helal, Khalil et al., 1999

Saudi Arabia

Followup: Not Reported

Quality: Not Applicable	1	53	0.25	0	0.3 mg/ml 4-4.9 minutes	Phaco.

Scleral

Clear cornea	-13.80	NR	96	NR	NR	5

	2	53	0.23	0	0.3 mg/ml 4-4.9 minutes	Phaco.

Scleral

1-site	-14.70	NR	60	NR	NR	2
#### § 217.171 Effective dates.

Regulations in this subpart are effective from May 15, 2022, through May 14, 2027.
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Max Berger, Plaintiff-Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>UEI 642 Tenth, LLC, Defendant-Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Small Claims Part of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Debra R. Samuels, J.), entered on or about January 24, 2018, in favor of defendant dismissing the action.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment (Debra R. Samuels, J.), entered on or about January 24, 2018, reversed, without costs, and judgment directed in favor of plaintiff in the principal sum of $2,500.</p><p>Civil Court erred in dismissing plaintiff-tenant's action to recover his security deposit. Inasmuch as it was undisputed at trial that plaintiff vacated the apartment premises and returned the keys five days after the end of his lease term, which expired on August 31, 2017, Civil Court erred in determining that defendant-landlord was entitled to use and occupancy for the entire month of September 2017. No monthly tenancy was created, since plaintiff did not offer, and the defendant did not accept, any rent payment after expiration of the lease (<i>see</i> Real Property Law ยง 232-c; <i>Matter of Jaroslow v Lehigh Val. R.R. Co.</i>, 23 NY2d 991 [1969]). Plaintiff is only liable for use and occupancy for the five days beyond expiration of the lease that he remained in possession (<i>see C &amp; N Camera &amp; Elecs. v Farmore Realty</i>, 178 AD2d 310, 311 [1991]), an amount which we have determined to be $500. After subtracting this sum from the security deposit, we award plaintiff judgment in the principal sum of $2,500.</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: February 28, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
**Read more of the August Dispatch**
    - Cape Coral Police Department’s Youngest Recruit Gets a Big Welcome from Its Oldest 
    - The Struggle Well Program for Law Enforcement: Life Enhancing Strategies for Personal Growth and Happiness in Difficult Times 
    - A Peer Support Team in Rural Maine 
    - Prostate Cancer Awareness Month  
    - The COPS Office at the 2023 IACP Conference
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

Publications and More764 publications • 16 categoriesSee the complete catalogThis Week's HighlightPolice OperationsExplore the topicRecent Publications10 publications added since 11/5/2023See the latest itemsHistorical PerspectiveThis day through the yearsLast year•2•5•10•20 years agoSearch the Resources LibrarySearch titles and abstractsFind text: Go

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 05:36 (UTC-5) in 0.16 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000559 Rules Hints Inactive
<PAGE>   1
                                                       Exhibit 10.8(d)
                                                        OGC 1998 10-K



                         [WILLOW CREEK PRESS LETTERHEAD]


04 June 1998

To:  Joe Baksha of Outlook Group

From:  Nancy Ravanelli

Re:  Discount on Outstanding Note

Hi Joe...

This fax is to confirm your earlier conversation with Tom.

Outlook Group agrees to accept a lump sum payment of $730,000 plus all accrued
unpaid interest as settlement in full for Willow Creek's outstanding note
balance of $805,000.

Willow Creek agrees to pay this balance plus interest on or before July 6, 1998.

Please fax back your agreement to this offer. If you have any questions, please
give me or Tom a call.

Thank you.

/s/



                                      * * *


[accepted orally by Outlook Group]
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 181 (Tuesday, September 19, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 54839]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7741]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Geological Survey


National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program (NCGMP) Advisory 
Committee

AGENCY:  U.S. Geological Survey.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Public Law 106-148, the NCGMP Advisory Committee 
will meet in Room 3B457 of the John Wesley Powell Building, 12201 
Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston, VA. The Advisory Committee, composed of 
scientists from Federal Agencies, State Agencies, academic 
institutions, and private companies, will advise the Director of the 
U.S. Geological Survey on planning and implementation of the geologic 
mapping program.
    At this meeting, the Advisory Committee will participate in the 
following efforts:
    <bullet> An external review of the NCGMP by the American 
Association for the Advancement of Science.
    <bullet> Discussion with the Program Coordinator on the progress of 
the USGS National Geological and Geophysical Data Preservation Program.

DATES: October 11-12, 2006 commencing at 9 a.m. on October 11 and 
adjourning by early afternoon on October 12.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randall Orndorff, U.S. Geological 
Survey, 908 National Center, Reston, Virginia 20192, (703) 648-4316.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Meetings of the National Cooperative 
Geological Mapping Program Advisory Committee are open to the Pubic.

    Dated: September 13, 2006.
Peter T. Lyttle,
Acting Associate Director for Geology.
[FR Doc. 06-7741 Filed 9-18-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4311-AM-M
**Read more of the November Dispatch**
    - Faith & Blue is at Work in the Ewing Township Police Department
    - Recruitment and Retention in Tough Times — Voices from the Field 
    - Engaging Our Military Veterans to Enable Successful Community Policing 
    - Managing Bias for Law Enforcement – A New Training Course for Police Agencies 
    - We Regret to Inform You – Trauma Notifications 
    - The COPS Office’s FY22 Funding Grants Include Awards to 52 Tribal Nations
U.S. Department of Justice

Office of Community Oriented Policing Services

 Fact Sheet www.cops.usdoj.gov

2017 COPS Office Community Policing 

Development Program

Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS 

Office) Community Policing Development (CPD) funds 

are used to advance the practice of community policing in 

law enforcement agencies through training and technical 

assistance and through the development of innovative 

community policing strategies, applied research, guidebooks, 

and best practices that are national in scope and responsive 

to the solicitation topic requirements.

COPS Office Community Policing 

Development Awards

The 2017 CPD Program funded projects related to a 

number of public safety topic areas, including the following:

 Field-Initiated Law Enforcement Microgrants

 Officer Safety and Wellness Resources

 Enhancing Officer Safety Through Increased Respect 

for Law Enforcement

 Online Training Development 

The full listing of awarded projects is located on the 

COPS Office website.

Funding Provisions

 In FY 2017, the COPS Office awarded over $3.5 million 

under the CPD program. Funding was awarded with the 

following provisions: The CPD solicitation was open to 

all public governmental agencies, profit and nonprofit 

institutions, institutions of higher education, community 

groups, and faith-based organizations. Accepted proposals 

were designed to innovatively advance the field, were 

cost-effective in their approach, and demonstrated an 

understanding of the principles of community policing 

and law enforcement.

 No local funding match was required. 

 Microgrants are one year (12 months) in duration. 

Most other awards are two years (24 months) in duration.

Contact the COPS Office

For more information about the Community Policing 

Development Program, please call the COPS Office 

Response Center at 800-421-6770 or visit the COPS Office 

online at www.cops.usdoj.gov.

Additional Resources 

 The State of Policing in the United States, Volume 1: 

https://ric-zai-inc.com/ric.php?page=detail&id=COPS-W0815. 

COPS Office CPD webpage: http://cops.usdoj.gov/Default.

asp?item=2450.



 2016 COPS Community Policing Development (CPD) Program 

Award Owner’s Manual: http://www.cops.usdoj.gov/

pdf/2016AwardDocs/cpd/2016_CPD_AOM.pdf.

Published 2017
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONSI, Randy K. Ferrell, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fauquier Bankshares, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.         Date: August 12, 2005 /s/  Randy K. Ferrell               Randy K. Ferrell      President and Chief Executive Officer
----

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 562/2000 of 15 March 2000 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 as regards the buying-in of beef

(Official Journal of the European Communities L 68 of 16 March 2000)

On page 43, Annex VII, point II. 3:

for:

               ‘The location of pallets and cages must be shown on a storage plant.’,

read:

               ‘The location of pallets and cages must be shown on a storage plan.’            

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Multi-Tech International Corp., a
Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending
September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), on the date hereof, I, Dr. David F. Hostelley, President and
Principal Financial Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Multi-Tech International Corp. and will be retained by Multi-Tech
International Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

                                  /s/ Dr. David F. Hostelley
                                  ------------------------------------------
                                  Dr. David F. Hostelley
                                  President

November 7, 2004
###### Editorial Note on Part 300

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 300 appear at 64 FR 44431, Aug. 16, 1999, and at 76 FR 59305, Sept. 26, 2011.

#### § 300.33 Compliance with applicable national laws.

The operator of the vessel shall comply with each of the applicable national laws, and the operator of the vessel shall be responsible for the compliance by the vessel and its crew with each of the applicable national laws, and the vessel shall be operated in accordance with those laws.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 27711

MEMORANDUM

To: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0199

From: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation

Subject: EO 12866 Conference Call with Crowell & Moring LLP on behalf of America’s Natural 

Gas Alliance on the Proposed Federal Plan and Model Trading Rules for the Clean 

Power Plan

SUMMARY

A conference call was held between EPA and representatives of Crowell & Moring LLP on behalf 

of America’s Natural Gas Alliance to answer clarifying question about the Proposed Federal Plan 

and Model Trading Rules for the Clean Power Plan.

ATTACHMENTS

None

Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT   3(e)

                       CERTIFICATE OF AMEMDMENT OF
                 RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF
                        CE SOFTWARE HOLDINGS, INC.

     CE Software Holdings, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and
by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, does hereby
certify:
 
     FIRST: That Section 4.1 of Article 4 of the Restated Certificate of
Incorporation shall be amended to read as follows:


                        "ARTICLE 4- CAPITAL STOCK

4.1    The aggregate number of shares the corporation has authority to issue 
shall be 7,000,000 shares of which 2,000,000 shares of the par value of $.10 
shall be designated as Common Stock, 3,000,000 shares of the par value of $.01 
shall be designated as Class B Common Stock and 2,000,000 of the par value of 
$.01 shall be designated as Preferred Stock.  All of the shares of Common Stock 
of the corporation of the par value of $.02 issued and outstanding, or held as 
treasury shares, immediately prior to the time this amendment becomes effective 
shall be and are by this means automatically reclassified and changed (without 
any further act) into shares of the par value of $.10, the number of which shall
equal the quotient derived from dividing the number of such shares by 5.  This 
amendment shall become effective without increasing or decreasing the amount of 
stated capital or paid-in surplus of the corporation, and shall constitute a 1 
for 5 reverse stock split, provided that no fractional shares of less than one 
share shall be issued.  The holders of fractional share interests of less than 
one share that occur as a result of the foregoing reclassification and change 
shall be paid in money by the Corporation the value of their fractional shares."


     SECOND: That the aforesaid amendment was duly adopted by written consent in
accordance with Section 228 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.

     THIRD: That written notice of the taking of such corporate action without a
meeting by less than unanimous written consent was sent or given to all
stockholders at least 20 days prior to the effective date of the amendment.  

     FOURTH: That the effective date of the aforesaid amendment shall be
June 30, 1997.

     CE Software Holdings, Inc. has caused this Certificate to be signed on
this 27th day of June, 1997 by its Secretary and authorized officer,
John S. Kirk, who acknowledges that the facts stated herein are true.

                                                CE Software Holdings, Inc.

                                                      /s/ John S. Kirk
                                                By__________________________
                                                     John S. Kirk, Secretary


                                   20
<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 181 (Tuesday, September 19, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 54844]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7750]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee <greek-i>13883; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee 
(<greek-i>13883) meeting:

    Date and Time: October 12-13, 2006, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, Room 1235, Stafford I 
Building, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. G. Wayne Van Citters, Director, Division of 
Astronomical Sciences, Suite 1045, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: 703-292-4908. 
Additional information is available at www.nsf.gov/mps/ast/aaac.jsp.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations to the 
National Science Foundation (NSF), the National Aeronautics and 
Space Administration (NASA) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 
on issues within the field of astronomy and astrophysics that are of 
mutual interest and concern to the agencies.
    Agenda: To hear presentations of current programming by 
representatives from NSF, NASA, DOE and other agencies relevant to 
astronomy and astrophysics; to discuss current and potential areas 
of cooperation between the agencies; to formulate recommendations 
for continued and new areas of cooperation and mechanisms for 
achieving them.

    Dated: September 14, 2006.
Susanne E. Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 06-7750 Filed 9-18-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
§ 260.26 Issuance of certificates. ( a ) An inspection certificate may be issued only by an inspector: *Provided,* That, another employee of the inspection service may sign any such certificate covering any processed product inspected by an inspector when given power of attorney by such inspector and authorized by the Secretary, to affix the inspector's signature to an inspection certificate which has been prepared in accordance with the facts set forth in the notes, made by the inspector, in connection with the inspection.
( b ) A certificate of loading shall be issued and signed by the inspector or licensed sampler authorized to check the loading of a specific lot of processed products: *Provided,* That, another employee of the inspection service may sign such certificate of loading covering any processed product checkloaded by an inspector or licensed sampler when given power of attorney by such inspector or licensed sampler and authorized by the Secretary to affix the inspector's or licensed sampler's signature to a certificate of loading which has been prepared in accordance with the facts set forth in the notes made by the inspector or licensed sampler in connection with the checkloading of a specific lot of processed products.