alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1245/2005

of 29 July 2005         

suspending the buying-in of butter in certain Member States

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999 of 16 December 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 as regards intervention on the market in butter and cream (2), and in particular Article 2 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Buying-in of butter as provided for in Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 is hereby suspended in Belgium, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Estonia, France, Ireland, Italy, Cyprus, Latvia, Hungary, Malta, Greece, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Austria, Portugal, Slovenia, Slovakia, Finland, Sweden and the United Kingdom.

Article 2

Regulation (EC) No 1186/2005 is hereby repealed.

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on 30 July 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 July 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

(2)OJ L 333, 24.12.1999, p. 11. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2250/2004 (OJ L 381, 28.12.2004, p. 25).

(3)OJ L 193, 23.7.2005, p. 19.

----
No. 11-10062.

#### Tadio *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

#### U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

#### Business Utilization and Development Specialist

#### Directory

---

`Servicewide Business Utilization & Development
Specialist 

James "Jim" W. McKoy, Jr. 
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Division of Contracting & General Services 
Mail Stop 212-Arlington Square 4401 N. Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22203 

Telephone: (703) 358-2225
Email:  [email protected]`



---

`Region 1					
Service Area:  California, Hawaii, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, and
Trust Territories of the Pacific

Kathy Halyschak     			
Division of Contracting and General Services	
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
911 NE 11th Avenue
Portland, OR 97232-4181

Telephone: (503) 231-6188
Facsimile: (503) 231-6259

Region 2					
Service Area:  New Mexico, Texas, Oklahoma, and Arizona

Reymundo Aragon				
Division of Contracting and General Services	
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
500 Gold Avenue, S.W.
P.O. Box 1306
Albuquerque, NM 87103

Telephone: (505) 248-6792
Facsimile: (505) 248-6791

Region 3					
Service Area: Indiana, Michigan, Illinois, Minnesota, Ohio,
Wisconsin, Iowa, and Missouri

John Mullins, Chief, 				
Division of Contracting and General Services	
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service   		
Bishop Henry Whipple Federal Building
One Federal Drive
Fort Snelling, MN 55111-4056

Telephone: (612) 713-5212
Facsimile: (612) 725-1717

Region 4					
Service Area:  Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North
Carolina, Arkansas, Louisiana, South Carolina, Tennessee,  Puerto Rico, and the
Virgin Islands

Don Calder 				
Division of Contracting and General Services	 
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service   
1875 Century Boulevard (3rd Floor)		
Atlanta, GA 30345

Telephone: (404) 679-4058
Facsimile: (404) 679-4057

Region 5					
Service Area:  Connecticut, West Virginia, Maryland, Delaware, Maine,
Massachusetts, Virginia, New Jersey, New Hampshire, Vermont, Rhode
Island, New York, and Pennsylvania

Gary Dupuis 				 
Division of Contracting and General Services	
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service			
300 Westgate Center Drive			
Hadley, MA 01035-9589			
						
Telephone: (413) 253-8240
Facsimile: (413) 253-8450

Region 6					
Service Area: Colorado, Kansas, Montana, North Dakota, Nebraska,
South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming

Dianne G. Hall			
Division of Contracting and General Services	
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service			
P.O. Box 25486, Denver Federal Center 
Denver, CO 80225

Telephone: (303) 236-5412 ext. 232
Facsimile: (303) 236-4791

Region 7					
Service Area: Alaska

Sheri Della Silva		
Division of Contracting and General Services
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
1011 E. Tudor Road
Anchorage, AK 99503-6199
Telephone: (907) 786-3436
Facsimile: (907) 786-3923

Region 9
Service Area:  Washington, DC Metropolitan Area

James "Jim" W. McKoy, Jr.
Division of Contracting and General Services
4401 N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 212
Arlington, VA  22203

Telephone:  (703) 358-2225
Facsimile:  (703) 358-2264`

---

##### Return toDivision of 
Contracing and General Services Page
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Jones Soda Co. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Peter van Stolk, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                      |  |             
|------------------------------------- |  | ------------
|/s/ Peter van Stolk                   |  | May 14, 2004
|Peter van Stolk,                      |  |             
|Chief Executive Officer and President |  |
#### Rea v. Ferguson, *Appellant.*

1. Practice: evidence. Where there is any evidence to support a verdict, this court will not disturb the judgment simply because it appears to be against the weight of evidence.

2. The objection that there was no evidence upon which to base an instruction given in this case, is unfounded in fact.

*Appeal from Andrew Circuit Court.*— Hon. H. S. Kelley, Judge.

Affirmed.

*Giddings & Booher*for appellant.

Norton, J.

This is a suit by plaintiff, as administrator of P. L. Hudgens, deceased, to recover balance alleged to be ■due on a promissory note of defendant. It appears from the record that defendant also had pending in the Andrew circuit court a suit against the plaintiff as administrator, to recover an account claimed to be due him from the estate of said Hudgens. The two suits, by agreement, were consolidated, and upon the trial plaintiff obtained judgment for $143; from which defendant appeals to this court. "We are asked to reverse the judgment on the ground that the verdict of the jury is against the evidence in that *226it only allows a part of defendant’s account, which was treated on the trial as an off-set, and on the further ground that there was no evidence upon which to base the following instruction given by the court: “If you find that the services sued for by defendant were rendered as a gi’atnity, without any intention at the time of charging for the same, you should not allow for such service, and whether said services were intended as a gift or were rendered without any intention of charging for them, may be determined from all the evidence in the case.”

As to the first point made it may be disposed of with the observation that it has been repeatedly held that where there is any evidence to support a verdict and judgment, that this court will not disturb it simply because it appears to be against the weight of evidence. *Price v. Leans,*49 Mo. 396; *Penn v. Lewis,*12 Mo. 161.

The objection made to the action of the court in giving the third instruction, is not well taken. The record shows that there was evidence to the effect that defendant was a son-in-law of the deceased, and that during the illness of the deceased, defendant visited and administered to him, not as a physician, but as a friend, and also that there was no charge made on his books at the time the services sued for were rendered, and that the note in question was given after said services were rendered, and that defendant, on two distinct occasions, promised to pay without setting up any claim for services. This we think was sufficient to authorize the instruction. Judgment affirmed,

in which all concur.
Case 16-26594 Doc 5 Filed 08/18/16 Entered 08/18/16 14:32:51 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-26594 Doc 5 Filed 08/18/16 Entered 08/18/16 14:32:51 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
§ 218.87 Renewals and modifications of Letters of Authorization. ( a ) An LOA issued under §§ 216.106 of this subchapter and 218.86 may be renewed or modified upon request by the applicant, provided that: ( 1 ) The planned specified activity and mitigation, monitoring, and reporting measures, as well as the anticipated impacts, are the same as those described and analyzed for the regulations in this subpart (excluding changes made pursuant to the adaptive management provision in paragraph (c)(1) of this section); and
( 2 ) NMFS determines that the mitigation, monitoring, and reporting measures required by the previous LOA(s) under the regulations in this subpart were implemented.
( b ) For LOA modification or renewal requests by the applicant that include changes to the activity or to the mitigation, monitoring, or reporting measures (excluding changes made pursuant to the adaptive management provision in paragraph (c)(1) of this section) that do not change the findings made for the regulations in this subpart or result in no more than a minor change in the total estimated number of takes (or distribution by species or stock or years), NMFS may publish a notice of planned LOA in the Federal Register, including the associated analysis of the change, and solicit public comment before issuing the LOA.
( c ) An LOA issued under §§ 216.106 of this subchapter and 218.86 may be modified by NMFS under the following circumstances: ( 1 ) *Adaptive management.* After consulting with the Navy regarding the practicability of the modifications, NMFS may modify (including adding or removing measures) the existing mitigation, monitoring, or reporting measures if doing so creates a reasonable likelihood of more effectively accomplishing the goals of the mitigation and monitoring. ( i ) Possible sources of data that could contribute to the decision to modify the mitigation, monitoring, or reporting measures in an LOA include: ( A ) Results from the Navy's monitoring from the previous year(s);
( B ) Results from other marine mammal and/or sound research or studies; or
( C ) Any information that reveals marine mammals may have been taken in a manner, extent, or number not authorized by the regulations in this subpart or subsequent LOAs.
( ii ) If, through adaptive management, the modifications to the mitigation, monitoring, or reporting measures are substantial, NMFS will publish a notice of planned LOA in the Federal Register and solicit public comment.
( 2 ) *Emergencies.* If NMFS determines that an emergency exists that poses a significant risk to the well-being of the species or stocks of marine mammals specified in LOAs issued pursuant to §§ 216.106 of this chapter and 218.86, an LOA may be modified without prior notice or opportunity for public comment. Notice would be published in the Federal Register within thirty days of the action.
EXHIBIT 31.2: Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications





I, Ding Rencai, certify that:





1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of China Water Group, Inc. (the “Registrant”);




2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.  The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and have:




a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.  The issuer’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the smaller reporting Registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.




Date: November 23, 2011
/s/ Ding RencaiDing Rencai, Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5235 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5235

To provide a minimum for payments with respect to counties in the State 
             of Texas from receipts from national forests.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 6, 1994

  Mr. Wilson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide a minimum for payments with respect to counties in the State 
             of Texas from receipts from national forests.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Texas County Minimum Payment Act of 
1994''.

SEC. 2. PAYMENT TO COUNTIES IN TEXAS FROM FOREST RECEIPTS.

    (a) In General.--In any fiscal year, the monetary amount of the 
distributive share to each county in the State of Texas from the 
payment made to the State under the Forest Receipts Act shall be the 
greater of--
            (1) the amount provided under the Act for such distributive 
        share to such county for the fiscal year; and
            (2) 85 percent of the amount of such distributive share to 
        such county in fiscal year 1993.
    (b) Adjustment of Payment to Texas to Ensure Payments to 
Counties.--In any fiscal year, the payment to the State of Texas, with 
respect to each county in the State, under the Forest Receipts Act from 
receipts from national forests shall be not less than 85 percent of the 
amount of the distributive share to such county of such payment in 
fiscal year 1993.
    (c) Definition.--For purposes of this section, the term ``Forest 
Receipts Act'' means the last undesignated paragraph under the heading 
``General Expenses, Forest Service'' under the heading ``FOREST 
SERVICE'' of the Act of May 23, 1908 (16 U.S.C. 500).

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act shall take effect on the first day of the first fiscal 
year beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Interactive Intelligence, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending March 31,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen R. Head, Chief Financial Officer, Vice
President of Finance and Administration, Secretary and Treasurer of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2,
      fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and





(2)
            The information contained in
      the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.








/s/ Stephen R.
Head


Stephen
R. Head


Chief
Financial Officer, Vice President of Finance and Administration,


Secretary
and Treasurer


(Principal
Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)


May 11,
2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Dean
Witter Portfolio Strategy Fund L.P. and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                     106,349,715
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  383,707<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             111,847,771<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               111,847,771<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,487,760<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,705,708
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (8,217,948)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (8,217,948)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,217,948)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include interest receivable of $383,707.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net
unrealized gain on open contracts of $5,114,349.
<F3>Liabilities include incentive fees payable of $0, redemptions
payable of $2,177,256, management fees payable of $372,503, and accrued
administrative expenses of $96,794.
<F4>Total revenues includes realized trading revenue of $7,743,552,
net change in unrealized of $(7,827,197) and interest income
of $4,571,405.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of WebMediaBrands Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donald J. O’Neill, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Donald J. O’Neill


Donald J. O’Neill


Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer)


November 4, 2010
#### § 78.63 Antenna structure marking and lighting.

The owner of each antenna structure is responsible for ensuring that the structure, if required, is painted and/or illuminated in accordance with part 17 of this chapter. In the event of default by the owner, each licensee shall be responsible for ensuring that the structure complies with applicable painting and lighting requirements.

[61 FR 4368, Feb. 6, 1996]
No. 11-9221.

#### Robertson *v.*Cain, Warden.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
93°92°91°90°89°88°87°

U.S.DepartmentoftheInterior

U.S.GeologicalSurvey

Incooperationwiththe

WisconsinDepartmentofTransportation

Water-ResourcesInvestigationsReport03-4250

Flood-FrequencyCharacteristicsofWisconsinStreams

byJ.F.WalkerandW.R.Krug

Plate2
No. 11M27.

No. 11M30.

No. 11M32.

No. 11M33.

No. 11M34.

#### Tates *v.*Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division; Evans *v.*United States; Steinmetz *v.*United States Postal Service et al.; Penelope W. *v.*Dorothea Dix Psychiatric Center; and Endencia *v.*Village of Streamwood, Illinois, et al.

Motions to direct the Clerk to file petitions for writs of certiorari out of time denied.