alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4980 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4980

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 23 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the bridge on United States Route 231 which crosses the 
   Ohio River between Maceo, Kentucky, and Rockport, Indiana, as the 
                     ``William H. Natcher Bridge''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The bridge on United States Route 231 which crosses the Ohio River 
between Maceo, Kentucky, and Rockport, Indiana, shall be known and 
designated as the ``William H. Natcher Bridge''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the bridge referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``William H. Natcher Bridge''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 22, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 95.2305 WMTS operator eligibility. Only the following persons are eligible to operate transmitters in the Wireless Medical Telemetry Service: ( a ) Authorized health care providers are eligible to operate transmitters in the WMTS without an individual license issued by the FCC provided the coordination requirements in § 95.2309 have been met.
( b ) Manufacturers of wireless medical telemetry devices and their representatives are eligible to operate WMTS transmitters solely for the purpose of demonstrating such equipment to, or installing and maintaining such equipment for, authorized health care providers.
Januar y 29 , 201 0 Stev e Weave

r Federa l Aviario n Administratio n Fligh t Standard s Distric t

Offic e S O 1 5 Citade l international . Suite 50 0 595 0 Hazeltin e National Dr . Orlando , F

L 32822-502 3 Re : Leaijet

6 0 Tir e Pressur e Inspectio n Waiver Dea r Mr . Weaver : 

## ^M'Zc/o-e>ts 4

Th e FA A ha s informe d Bombardier tha t it plan s t o issu e a

n Airworthines s Directiv e regardin g th e Learje t 6 0 busines s jet . Thi s i s on e element o f astrategi c effor

t t o promote safet

y acros s th e entire aviatio n industr

y wit h respec t t o prope r tire inflation . Bombardier

issue d arevisio n t o th e Leaijet 60/60X R Airplan e Flight Manua l (chang e #37 ) tha

t requires ;

• "Th e nos e and mai n tire pressure s mus t b e checke d withi n 9 6 hour s (not fligh t hoxirs ) prio r

t o takeof f usin g th e procedure s hste d i n Chapter 1 2 o f th e Learje

t 6 0 Maintenanc e Manual. " I n alega l opinio n issue d b y th e Offic e o f th e Chie f Counsel , Federa

l Aviatio n Administration , date d Februar y 26 , 2009 , Counse l write s tha t "checkin g tire pressur e on aLearje t Model 6 0 aircraf

t i s preventiv e maintenanc e an d no t asimpl e pre-fligh

t inspectio n task" . I n order t o mee t th e safet y requirement s o f

thi s Chang e and concurrentl y maintai n ou r operational commitments , w e hav e requeste d a n exemptio n under

1 4 C.F.R . Par

t 1 1 which woul d allo w our Learje t 6 0 pilot s t o chec k

tir e pressure . I n accordanc e wit

h FA R 135.325(a) ( 1) , th e require d pilo t h:ainin g will incorporate Bombardier Learjet' s onlin e Tire Pressur e Checkin g Customer Trainin g Presentatio n tha

t i s locate d a

t http://yAvw.batraming.com . Thank yo u i n advanc e fo

r you r promp t attentio n t

o thi s request .

' Sinca^ . | i Leig h Mcintos h Assistant Directo r o f Operation s S K Logistics , In

c St . Augustin e Airport (SGJ ) 12 1 Hawkey e Vie w Lan e • Si . Augustine , FL 3209 5 Tel ; (904 ) 827-199 9 • Tol l Free : (866 ) 564-478 2 • Fax : (904 ) 827-139 9

Etnail ; LeightSisk-iets.co m• www,sk-jets.co m
USDA Is Ahead of Schedule on
§ 217.200 Specified activities and specified geographical region. ( a ) Regulations in this subpart apply only to the incidental taking of those marine mammals specified in § 217.202(b) by the Port of Anchorage and the U.S. Department of Transportation Maritime Administration (MARAD), and those persons it authorizes to engage in construction activities associated with the Port of Anchorage Marine Terminal Redevelopment Project, specifically in-water pile driving, at the Port of Anchorage, Alaska.
( b ) [Reserved]
Form of 2007 Executive Bonus Plan Performance Award Agreement



 Exhibit 10.18 
 2007 EXECUTIVE BONUS PLAN 
 PERFORMANCE AWARD AGREEMENT 
 THIS 2007 EXECUTIVE BONUS PLAN PERFORMANCE AWARD AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”), entered into as of March 14, 2007, is made by and between
FLIR Systems, Inc. (“Company”), an Oregon corporation, and                      (“Employee”), an employee of Company,
pursuant to the terms and conditions of the FLIR Systems, Inc. 2007 Executive Bonus Plan (the “Plan”), which provides for cash Performance Awards to certain key executives. Any defined term not otherwise defined herein shall have the
meaning set forth in the Plan. 
 1. Terms of Performance Award. Subject to shareholder approval of the Plan at the next annual
meeting of Company’s shareholders, Company hereby grants to Employee the opportunity to earn a cash Performance Award pursuant to the terms of the Plan and this Agreement. In addition to the terms and conditions set forth in the Plan, the
following terms shall apply for purposes of determining the Performance Award of Employee for the Performance Period beginning January 1, 2007: 
 a. The Performance Period shall be the calendar year beginning January 1, 2007. 
 b. The Performance
Goal for the Performance Period shall be Company achieving $1.52 fully diluted earnings per share. 
 c. The Employee Target Award for the
Performance Period shall be $                    . 
 d. Subject to the cap on the amount of a Performance Award, as provided in Section 6(e) of the Plan, the Employee Target Award under the Plan shall increase or decrease four percent (4%) for every
incremental increase or decrease of $0.01 from Company target earnings per share of $1.52 
 e. The Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors of Company may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay Employee an amount (including zero) that is less than the Employee’s Employee Target Award (or attained percentage thereof) regardless of the degree of attainment of the Performance
Goals. 
 2. Miscellaneous. This Agreement and the Plan contain the entire agreement and understanding of the parties with respect to
the subject matter contained in this Agreement, and supersede all prior communications, representations and negotiations in respect thereto. The terms and conditions of Employee’s Performance Award for the Performance Period set forth herein
shall be governed by this Agreement and the Plan. Should the terms and conditions of this Agreement conflict with the Plan, the terms and conditions of the Plan will control. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which will be
deemed an original, but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument. This Agreement may be modified only in writing signed by the original parties hereto, their successors, or by their authorized representatives. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the parties effective as of the date set forth above. 
  

									
	EMPLOYEE	 		 	FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
					
	  	 	  	 		 	By:	 	  
	[INSERT NAME]	 		 	Name:	 	  
		 		 		 	Title:	 	  

  

 2007 EXECUTIVE BONUS PLAN PERFORMANCE AWARD AGREEMENT
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4939 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4939

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 5 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To designate the United States courthouse located at 201 South Vine 
 Street in Urbana, Illinois, as the ``Frederick S. Green United States 
                             Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 201 South Vine Street in 
Urbana, Illinois, shall be known and designated as the ``Frederick S. 
Green United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Frederick S. 
Green United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 4, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk April 29, 2013

s0422 

# Order

April 29, 2013

146406

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146406

COA: 308354

Oakland CC: 1994

- 130950

- FC

SAMUEL PAUL PEARSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 23, 2012

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CLASSICA GROUP TECHNOLOGIES ITALIA, S.r.l.
                     Via Nagy 7, Pratissolo di Scandiano, RE
                Telephone -39 0522 76 70 34 Fax 39 0522 76 79 71


                                                            Ing. Giuseppe Ruozi
                                                            Ricerca e Sviluppo


                                 10 August 2003


The Classica Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
2400 Main Street
Suite #12
Sayreville, New Jersey 08872

Re:      Consent to use of my name and curriculum vita.

To whom it may concern:

The Classica Group, Inc. and its Subsidiaries ("the Company") have and are
hereby granted my permission to use my name, a description of my education, past
business activities, professional achievements and experience, and any other
facts concerning me and my relationship with the Company in any documents, press
releases, publications, oral or visual presentations, filings with governmental
authorities, or in any other manner or material whatsoever as they see fit.




/s/ Ing. Giuseppe Ruozi
----------------------------------
Ing. Giuseppe Ruozi
03-March-2003
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ZEEV VINIK and JANY VINIK , Appellant s ,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 734

[ February 21, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,
Broward County ; Joel T. Lazarus

, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No. 2016

- CA

007110

.

Lee H. Schillinger of Law Offices of Lee H. Schillinger, P.A., Weston, for appellants.

Michael K. Winston and Dean A. Morande of Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

G ROSS
, C ONNER and F ORST
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
USDANEWS                                                           VOLUME 58 NO.1 - JANUARY 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FILED AS
PART OF THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                      22,962,655
<SECURITIES>                                 4,348,682          
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,897,272
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            43,941,451
<PP&E>                                      12,789,499
<DEPRECIATION>                             (5,364,082)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              93,076,699
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       34,631,004
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,625,382
<OTHER-SE>                                   (214,213)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                93,076,699
<SALES>                                    103,036,191
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           103,036,191
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           103,647,634
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,086,715
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,698,158)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,050,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,748,158)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.42)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 217.112 Permissible methods of taking.

Under an LOA issued pursuant to §§ 216.106 of this chapter and 217.116, the Holder of the LOA (hereinafter “Navy”) may incidentally, but not intentionally, take marine mammals within the area described in 217.110(b) by harassment associated with construction activities related to replacement of Pier 3, provided the activity is in compliance with all terms, conditions, and requirements of the regulations under this subpart and the applicable LOA.
Stephen Perkins, Director

Office of Ecosystem Protection

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

5 Post Office Squm’e - Suite t00

Boston, MA 02109-3912

perkins.stephen@epa.gov

STATE OF CONNECTICUT

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

December 9, 2010

Re; Final Proposed Regulatory Language and Status Report:

Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Permitting in Connecticut

Dear Mr. Perkins:

As promised in the letter from Commissioner Marrella dated September 2 t, 2010 to Administrator

Spalding, I am writing to you regarding the status of the Connecticut Department of Environmental

Protection’s (DEP’s) efforts to process regulatory revisions to the Title V and new source review permitting

programs to include GHG emissions at the applicability thresholds defined in Prevention of Significant

Deterioration and Title V Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule (75 FR 31514; June 3, 2010).

DEP is making progress towm’ds adoption of the regulatory revisions at a speed consistent with meeting the

March t, 2011 SIP submission deadline. DEP held a public hem’ing on the proposed regulatory revisions

on October 18, 20 I0 and received comment on the proposal, including corrective comments from your

office. DEP considered all the submitted comments and made revisions to the proposal. The resulting final

draft of the regulation and a report that responds to the submitted comments is now at Connecticut’s Office

of Attorney General for review prior to submission to the Legislative Regulations Review Committee

(LRRC). DEP will be submitting this final proposal to the LRRC as soon as possible after December 27,

2010, the end of a mandatory 20-day notice period required by Connecticut’s regulatory adoption laws.

We appreciate your willingness to parallel process your approval with the Connecticut regulatory adoption

process. As the post-hearing draft of the regulatory revisions represents DEP’s final proposal, we request

that you use this version of the regulatory revisions, rather than the version released for public comment, in

drafting your Federal Register notice. This will be helpful to both of our agencies as the post-hearing draft

includes corrections in response to a number of EPA’s comments. The final proposed regulatory revisions

and the response to comment report are available on DEP’s website at the following location:

ht~p://www.ct.~/cwp/view.asp?a=2684&q=331220&depNav GID=1619

Should you or your staff have any questions regarding this submittal, please call Gary Rose, Director,

Engineering and Enforcement, at 860-424-3468.

Donald Daht, U.S. EPA, Region 1

Sincerely yours,

Anne R. Gobin, Chief

Bureau of Air Management

(Printed on Recycled Paper)

79EIrnStl~et  ̄ Halaford, CT 06106-5127

www.ct,gov/dep

An Equal Opportunity Employer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5213 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5213

  To amend the Clean Air Act to prohibit the Federal government from 
       requiring State plans to mandate trip reduction measures.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 6, 1994

  Mr. DeLay introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Clean Air Act to prohibit the Federal government from 
       requiring State plans to mandate trip reduction measures.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT OF CLEAN AIR ACT TO REMOVE TRIP REDUCTION MANDATE.

    Section 182(c)(5) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 and 
following) is amended by adding at the end thereof the following: ``No 
revision of a State implementation plan to include provisions specified 
in this paragraph shall be required to include measures described in 
section 108(f)(A)(iv).''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 222.401 Observer requirement.

Any United States fishing vessel, either commercial or recreational, which operates within the territorial seas or exclusive economic zone of the United States or on the high seas, or any fishing vessel that is otherwise subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, operating in a fishery that is identified through the annual determination process specified in § 222.402 must carry aboard a NMFS-approved observer upon request by the NMFS Assistant Administrator, in consultation with NMFS Regional Administrators and Science Center Directors, as appropriate. NMFS and/or interested cooperating entities will pay direct costs for the observer. Owners and operators must comply with observer safety requirements specified at 50 CFR 600.725 and 50 CFR 600.746 and the terms and conditions specified in the written notification.
Exhibit
32.1
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Apollo Medical Holdings, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Warren
Hosseinion, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
                The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and
 
 (2)
                The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section  1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
 Dated:    December
      15, 2008
                  
                  
                  
                  By:Warren Hosseinion
                    Chief
      Executive Officer
#### §18.142 Specified activities covered by this subpart.

Regulations in this subpart apply to the nonlethal incidental, but not intentional, take, as defined in § 18.3 and under section 3 of the Marine Mammal Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 1371 *et seq.*), of small numbers of northern sea otters (*Enhydra lutris kenyoni;* hereafter “sea otters”) by the U.S. Coast Guard (hereafter “USCG” or “the applicant”) while engaged in activities associated with or in support of marine construction activities in the Gulf of Alaska. The applicant is a U.S. citizen as defined in § 18.27(c).