alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OFFICE OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY

 PUBLIC MEETING

 FOSSIL FUEL-GENERATED ENERGY CONSUMPTION REDUCTION FOR NEW FEDERAL BUILDINGS

 AND MAJOR RENOVATIONS OF FEDERAL BUILDINGS

 U.S. Department of Energy

 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W.

 Washington, DC 20585

 Friday, November 12, 2010

 Room 1E-245

 Purpose

The purpose of this public meeting is to hear the views and comments of interested persons on issues 

related to proposed fossil fuel-generated consumption reduction requirements for Federal buildings.

 Agenda

9:00 – 9:30 Welcome, Introductions, Agenda Review, & Opening Statements

Doug Brookman

 Interested parties make a brief summary of their comments

9:30-10:30 Overview of Fossil Fuel-Generated Energy Consumption Reduction for New Federal 

Buildings and Major Renovations of Federal Buildings Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

Margo Appel

10:30-10:40 Break

10:40-12:30 Stakeholders Statements

12:30-1:30 Lunch

1:30-3:00 Stakeholders Statements

3:00-3:10 Break

3:10-4:00 Question & Answer

4:00-4:30 Closing Remarks

 Adjournment
§ 217.104 Mitigation requirements. When conducting the activities identified in § 217.100(a), the mitigation measures contained in any LOA issued under §§ 216.106 of this chapter and 217.106 must be implemented. These mitigation measures shall include but are not limited to: ( a ) *General conditions.* ( 1 ) Researchers must observe a site from a distance for at least five minutes, using binoculars if necessary, to detect any marine mammals prior to approach to determine if mitigation is required (*i.e.,* site surveys will not be conducted if other species of pinnipeds are present, researchers will approach with caution, walking slowly, quietly, and close to the ground to avoid surprising any hauled-out individuals and to reduce flushing/stampeding of individuals).
( 2 ) Researchers must avoid pinnipeds along access ways to sites by locating and taking a different access way. Researchers must keep a safe distance from and not approach any marine mammal while conducting research, unless it is absolutely necessary to approach a marine mammal in order to continue conducting research (*i.e.,* if a site cannot be accessed or sampled due to the presence of pinnipeds).
( 3 ) Researchers must avoid making loud noises (*i.e.,* using hushed voices) and keep bodies low to the ground in the visual presence of pinnipeds.
( 4 ) Researchers must monitor the offshore area for predators (such as killer whales and white sharks) and avoid flushing of pinnipeds when predators are observed in nearshore waters.
( 5 ) Researchers must promptly vacate sites at the conclusion of sampling.
( b ) *Pup protection measure.* Intentional approach must not occur if dependent pups are present to avoid mother/pup separation and trampling of pups. Staff shall reschedule work at sites where pups are present, unless other means of accomplishing the work can be done without causing disturbance to mothers and dependent pups.
#### § 260.80 Charges for inspection service on a contract basis.

Irrespective of fees and charges prescribed in the foregoing sections, the Secretary may enter into a written memorandum of understanding or contract, whichever may be appropriate, with any administrative agency charged with the administration of a marketing order effective pursuant to the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as revised (16 U.S.C. 661 *et seq.*) for the making of inspections pursuant to said agreement or order on such basis as will reimburse the National Marine Fisheries Service of the Department for the full cost of rendering such inspection service as may be determined by the Secretary. Likewise, the Secretary may enter into a written memorandum of understanding or contract, whichever may be appropriate, with an administrative agency charged with the administration of a similar program operated pursuant to the laws of any State.

[36 FR 21038, Nov. 3, 1971]
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5131 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5131

To amend the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 to prohibit 
   the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development from recapturing, 
 adjusting, withdrawing, or reducing any UDAG funds from recipients of 
                  UDAG grants, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 28, 1994

 Mr. Hinchey (for himself and Mr. Kanjorski) introduced the following 
bill; which was referred to the Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban 
                                Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 to prohibit 
   the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development from recapturing, 
 adjusting, withdrawing, or reducing any UDAG funds from recipients of 
                  UDAG grants, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. UDAG RECAPTURES.

    (a) In General.--Section 119(g) of the Housing and Community 
Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5318(g)) is amended by striking the 
second sentence and inserting the following: ``Except as provided in 
section 232(c) of the Multifamily Housing Property Disposition Reform 
Act of 1994, during the 18-month period beginning on the date on which 
the UDAG Retention Program authorized by such section expires, the 
Secretary shall be prohibited from recapturing, adjusting, withdrawing, 
or reducing any UDAG funds from recipients of UDAG grants. For the 
duration of the UDAG Retention Program, the Secretary--
            ``(1) shall provide technical assistance to grant 
        recipients to adjust, rework, relocate, refine, redefine, or 
        otherwise revise the original UDAG project description to 
        produce a viable UDAG project in accordance with the 
        requirements of this section; and
            ``(2) shall not impose regulatory requirements that are not 
        statutorily based if such requirements restrict the revision or 
        use of UDAG funding, including any requirement that amendments 
        to an urban development action grant agreement must be for 
        activities that are `integrally related activities' in relation 
        to the approved project.''.
    (b) Extension of Time Period.--Section 119(t) of the Housing and 
Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5318(t)) is amended by 
striking ``90 days'' each place it appears and inserting ``21 months''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Siclone Industries, Inc., on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Paul
Adams, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a)
or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date: August 20,  2007             /s/ Paul Adams
                                   ----------------------------------
                                   Paul Adams
                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                   And Principal Accounting Officer
<PAGE>   1


                                                                 EXHIBIT 23.3

                                AUDITOR'S CONSENT



We have issued our report dated June 1, 1998 accompanying the consolidated
financial statements included in the Annual Report of IntraNet Solutions, Inc. 
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 1998. We hereby consent to the 
incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of 
IntraNet Solutions, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-11489) and on Forms S-3 
(File No. 333-14175, File No. 333-33437 and File No. 333-57181).

                                                       /s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Minneapolis,  Minnesota
June 25, 1998
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00392-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.V., A CHILD §

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 89th District Court

of Wichita County (13158-JR-C)

April 1, 2020

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no reversible error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment 

of the trial court is affirmed. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

 Justice Lee Gabriel
§ 23.1 What are the purposes of these regulations and CITES? ( a ) *Treaty.* The regulations in this part implement the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, also known as CITES, the Convention, the Treaty, or the Washington Convention, TIAS (Treaties and Other International Acts Series) 8249.
( b ) *Purpose.* The aim of CITES is to regulate international trade in wildlife and plants, including parts, products, and derivatives, to ensure it is legal and does not threaten the survival of species in the wild. Parties, recognize that: ( 1 ) Wildlife and plants are an irreplaceable part of the natural systems of the earth and must be protected for this and future generations.
( 2 ) The value of wildlife and plants is ever-growing from the viewpoints of aesthetics, science, culture, recreation, and economics.
( 3 ) Although countries should be the best protectors of their own wildlife and plants, international cooperation is essential to protect wildlife and plant species from over-exploitation through international trade.
( 4 ) It is urgent that countries take appropriate measures to prevent illegal trade and ensure that any use of wildlife and plants is sustainable.
( c ) *National legislation.* We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), implement CITES through the Endangered Species Act (ESA).
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4874

To amend the White House Conference on Small Business Authorization

Act to require the final report of the National Conference to be published

in the Federal Register and distributed through the regional offices

of the Small Business Administration.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 1, 1994

Mr. MCHALE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Small Business

A BILL

To amend the White House Conference on Small Business

Authorization Act to require the final report of the National Conference to be published in the Federal Register

and distributed through the regional offices of the Small

Business Administration.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FINAL REPORT OF NATIONAL WHITE HOUSE

4 CONFERENCE ON SMALL BUSINESS.

5 Section 7(a) of the White House Conference on Small

6 Business Authorization Act (15 U.S.C. 631 note) is

7 amended—
2

•HR 4874 IH

1 (1) in the first sentence by inserting ‘‘and pub2 lished in the Federal Register’’ before the period at

3 the end; and

4 (2) in the third sentence by inserting ‘‘and dis5 tributed through the regional offices of the Small

6 Business Administration’’ before the period at the

7 end.

Æ
Case 16-25559 Doc 1 Filed 08/09/16 Entered 08/09/16 14:45:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 10
Case 16-25559 Doc 1 Filed 08/09/16 Entered 08/09/16 14:45:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 10
Case 16-25559 Doc 1 Filed 08/09/16 Entered 08/09/16 14:45:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 10
Case 16-25559 Doc 1 Filed 08/09/16 Entered 08/09/16 14:45:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 10
Case 16-25559 Doc 1 Filed 08/09/16 Entered 08/09/16 14:45:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 10
Case 16-25559 Doc 1 Filed 08/09/16 Entered 08/09/16 14:45:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 10
Case 16-25559 Doc 1 Filed 08/09/16 Entered 08/09/16 14:45:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 10
Case 16-25559 Doc 1 Filed 08/09/16 Entered 08/09/16 14:45:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 10
Case 16-25559 Doc 1 Filed 08/09/16 Entered 08/09/16 14:45:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 10
Case 16-25559 Doc 1 Filed 08/09/16 Entered 08/09/16 14:45:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 10
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0958NACOLE Case Studies on Civilian Oversight: Civilian Investigative Panel (Miami, Florida)The wave of high-profile incidents in 2020 between police and community members prompted widespread calls for greater community oversight of law enforcement agencies. Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement: Report on the State of the Field and Effective Oversight Practices, a white paper by the National Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement, outlines the history of civilian oversight including reference to this case study of the Miami Police Department and eight others.By National Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement (NACOLE)Categories: Data and AnalysisLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0958Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Jul 2021Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 01:58 (UTC-5) in 0.95 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            College of Information and Cyberspace
                    National Defense University
                CIC
        Search
                    Search CIC:
                        Search
                Search CIC:
                    Search
    Home

    About 
        Mission & Vision

    Faculty & Staff

    Fact Sheet

    Alumni

    Internships

    FAQ

    Admissions 
        Eligibility Requirements

    Admissions Calendar

    Application Instructions

    Apply Online

    International Students

    Academics 
        Graduate Catalog

    M.S. in Strategic Information and Cyberspace Studies
        
        JPME Master's Degree

    Cyber Workforce Master's Degree (Part Time)

    Leadership Development Programs

    Graduate Certificates

    Academic Partners

    Current Students 
        JPME II  Incoming Students

    LDP Incoming Students

    Student Registration

    Bring Your Own Device

    IA Compliance

    Completion Procedures / Order Transcripts

    Student Services and Resources

    Events
    
        Cyber Beacon

    Cyber PME Colloquium

    Hopper Award

    Lecture Series

    CYBERCOM Symposium

    NEWS

    UC2
    
        About

    Events

    Work With Us

    Center for Cybersecurity
    
        About

    Cybersecurity Center POC

    Cybersecurity Supporting Faculty

    CAE-CDE CISO Certificate Program

    Cybersecurity Trending News

    Cyber Labs
        
        Ethical Hacking

    Critical Infrastructure - SCADA

    Cyber Exercises
        
        Tabletop Exercise

    Cyber Competitions

    Cyber Resources and Awareness

    Stakeholder / Industry Advisory Council

    Contact 
        Contact Us

    Directions

    Access to Ft. McNair

    Map of Ft. McNair  Home
  NEWS
  News & Announcements
 News & Announcements News
 Republic of Korea Cyber Command Visits iCollege By Patricia Coopersmith
 here
 SHARE
 PRINT
 National Defense University


College of Information and Cyberspace

300 Fifth Ave., Bldg. 62
Fort Lesley J. McNair
Washington, DC 20319-5066

202-685-6300
                    Stay Connected
                
                
                DOD Privacy & Security
 DOD Links Disclaimer
 DOD Social Media Policy
 DOD Web Policy
 FOIA
 NDU System of Records Notice
 NDU Privacy & Security Notice
 No FEAR Act
 Open GOV
 Plain Writing Act
 Section 508
 Small Business Act
 USA.gov
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
§ 217.270 Specified activity and specified geographical region. ( a ) Regulations in this subpart apply to activities associated with the Revolution Wind project (hereafter referred to as the “Project”) by Revolution Wind, LLC (hereafter referred to as “Letter of Authorization (LOA) Holder”) and those persons it authorizes or funds to conduct activities on its behalf in the specified geographical region outlined in paragraph (b) of this section. Requirements imposed on LOA Holder must be implemented by those persons it authorizes or funds to conduct activities on its behalf.
( b ) The specified geographical region is the Mid-Atlantic Bight, which includes, but is not limited to, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) Lease Area Outer Continental Shelf (OCS)-A 0486 Commercial Lease of Submerged Lands for Renewable Energy Development, two export cable routes, and two sea-to-shore transition points located at Quonset Point in North Kingstown, Rhode Island.
( c ) The specified activities are impact pile driving of wind turbine generator (WTGs) and offshore substation (OSSs) foundations; vibratory pile driving (install and subsequently remove) of cofferdams and goal posts; pneumatic hammering (install and subsequently remove) of casing pipes; high-resolution geophysical (HRG) site characterization surveys; detonation of unexploded ordnances or munitions and explosives of concern (UXOs/MECs); vessel transit within the specified geographical region to transport crew, supplies, and materials; WTG operation; fishery and ecological monitoring surveys; placement of scour protection; and trenching, laying, and burial activities associated with the installation of the export cable routes from OSSs to shore-based converter stations and inter-array cables between turbines.
Office of Community Oriented Policing Services

2014 COPS Anti-Methamphetamine Program Awards

State and Agency Name Estimated Award Amount

California

California Department of Justice $999,793 

Indiana

Indiana State Police $567,000 

Iowa 

 Iowa Division of Narcotics Enforcement $296,972 

Maine

Maine Drug Enforcement Agency at Augusta $905,102 

New York

New York State Police $493,656 

North Carolina 

 North Carolina Department of Public Safety $302,851 

Oklahoma 

 Oklahoma Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs Control $217,400 

Tennessee

Tennessee Bureau of Investigation $631,522 

Virginia

Virginia Department of State Police $621,970 

West Virginia

West Virginia, State of $1,000,000 

Page 1 of 1
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-17-0000826

20-MAR-2020

07:51 AM
§ 95.731 Permissible RCRS use. RCRS transmitters may only be used to transmit one-way communications and only for the purposes set forth in this section. (One-way communications are transmissions which are not intended to establish communications with another station.) ( a ) *Control of model crafts and devices.* When an RCRS transmitter is used to control a model craft or device, the RCRS channels in specific frequency bands must be used, based on the type of model craft or device being controlled, as follows: ( 1 ) RCRS channels in the 72 MHz frequency band may be used only to control and operate model aircraft.
( 2 ) RCRS channels in the 75 MHz frequency band may be used only to control and operate model surface craft.
( 3 ) RCRS channels in the 26-28 MHz frequency band may be used to control or operate any kind of device.
( b ) *Telecommand.* Any RCRS channel may be used by the operator to turn on and/or off a device at a remote location.
( c ) *Telemetry.* Any RCRS channel in the 26-28 MHz frequency band may be used to transmit a signal from a sensor at a remote location that turns on and/or off an indicating device for the operator.
§ 14.151 Primary enclosures. ( a ) Except as provided in § 14.106(j), ventilation openings must be located on at least two walls of a primary enclosure. When the required ventilation openings are located on two opposite walls of the primary enclosure, these ventilation openings shall comprise at least 16 percent of the total surface area of the ventilated wall. When ventilation openings are located on all four walls, the openings shall comprise at least 8 percent of the total surface area of each wall. At least one-third of the total minimum area required for ventilation of the primary enclosure shall be located on the upper one-half of the primary enclosure.
( b ) No more than one sloth, bat, or flying lemur (Cynocephalidae) shall be transported in a primary enclosure. However, a mother and her nursing young being transported for medical reasons, an established male-female pair, a family group, a pair of juvenile animals that have not reached puberty, or other small groups of animals that have been habitually housed together may be shipped in the same primary enclosure.
( c ) A primary enclosure used to transport sloths, bats, or flying lemurs shall be large enough to ensure that each animal has sufficient space to move freely and in a normal manner and shall have a wide perch, bar, or mesh of suitable strength fitted under the top of the enclosure and spaced from it in such a way that the animals may hang from it freely in a natural position.
No. 11-9813.

#### Parvin *v.*Cate, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.