alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Hillsborough

No. 81-314

#### New Hampshire Insurance Company v. Roger Bisson Pierrette Bisson *& a.*v. New Hampshire Insurance Company

August 17, 1982

*748*Augustine J. McDonough P.A.,*of Manchester *(Augustine J. McDonough*and *Mark L. Mallory*on the brief), by brief for New Hampshire Insurance Company.

*Craig, Wenners, Craig & McDowell P.A.,*of Manchester *(Joseph F. McDowell, III,*on the brief), by brief for the Bissons.

Memorandum Opinion

These cases, consolidated below, raise the issue whether, under an uninsured motorist clause of an insurance policy, an insurance company is liable in excess of the $20,000 policy limit for damages due to loss of consortium arising out of bodily injury to one person, where an insured suffers an injury and a spouse suffers a consequential loss of consortium. An arbitrator awarded $20,000 to Pierrette Bisson for injuries suffered and $9,000 to her husband, Roger, for loss of consortium. Refusing to confirm the $9,000 award to Roger Bisson, the Master *(Robert T. Griffith,*J., Ret.) recommended, and the Trial Court *{Goode,*J.) approved, a ruling that “the policy limit for one bodily injury in the accident is $20,000, and the claim for the loss of consortium in this case arises from the bodily injury to Pierrette Bisson” and thus “the policy limit has been exhausted by the payment to her.” We affirm.

In this case, the policy contained a limit of $20,000 for bodily injury to one person and a limit of $40,000 for bodily injury to two or more persons arising out of a single accident. The plaintiff contends that loss of consortium is a separate bodily injury, triggering the $40,000 limit. We disagree.

A spouse has a separate cause of action for loss of consortium, RSA 507:8-a; *Bean v. Miller,*122 N.H. 681, 684, 448 A.2d 424, 426 (1982), but it is not a separate “bodily injury,” triggering the multiple injury limit. *See id.*at 684, 448 A.2d at 426. Although the language of the policy here contains a definition of “bodily injury” that includes “sickness or disease,” we do not find loss of consortium to be included in these terms either. The master *749correctly determined that $20,000 was the limit of the insurer’s liability.

*Affirmed.*
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane lunani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T MAR I A C ON C E P S I ON S AN C HE Z DE O R O Z C O , a. k. a. C on ce pci on S anchezR i vera , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 70813 A ge nc yN o. A 077- 463- 527 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ar c h 8, 2011 ** B efo re: F A R R IS , O ’ S C A N N L A IN , an dB Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. M ar i aC onc e ps i on S anc he z D e O r oz c o, ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pet i t i on s f

or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ order di sm i ss i ng her appe a lf r om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s ( “ I J ” ) de c i s i on de ny i ng he rappl i c a t i on f or 

# FI LED MA R 28 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 70813 2 cancel l at i on of re m ov al . W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew f ors ubs t ant i a le vi de nc e the a ge nc y ’ s c ont i nuous phy s i c a lpr e s e nc e de t e rm i na t i on, Ibarra-Flores v. G on zales , 439 F . 3d 614, 618 ( 9th C i r . 2006) , and r e vi e w de novo c la im s o f c o n s titu tio n a l v io la tio n s in im m ig r a tio n p r o c e e d in g s , I tu rr i b a rr i a v . I

NS , 3 2 1 F . 3 d8 8 9 , 8 9 4 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 3 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. S ub s t an t i a le v i d e n c e s up p o rt s th e a g e n c y ’ s d e t e rm i n a t i o n th a tS an c h e z De O r oz c o di d notm e e tthe c ont i nuous phy s i c a lpr e s e nc e r e qui r e m e ntw he r e the re cord i ncl ud es a N ot i ce and O rderof E xp edi t ed R em ov alas w el las other g o v e rn m e n t d o c u m e n ts c o rr o b o r a tin g th e e x p e d ite dr e m o v a l. See J ua rez-R am os v. G on zales , 48 5 F . 3d50 9, 51 1 (9th C i r. 20 07 ) ( expedi t ed re m ov alorder i nt errupt s an al i en’ s c on t i nu ou s physi ca lpres ence for c ance l l at i on pu rposes ). S anchez D e O rozc o’ s due proces s c l ai m fa i l s bec ause the IJprop er l y deni ed h e rc an c e lla tio n ap p lic a tio n o n th e b a s is th a t s h e f a ile dto e s tab lis h th e r e qu is ite c o n tin u o u s p h y s ic a l p r e s e n c e . See 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 2 9 b ( b ) ( 1 ) ( A ) ; La ta v . I NS , 204 F . 3d 1241, 1246 ( 9th C i r . 2000) ( r e qui r i ng e rr orf orape t i t i one rt o pr e va i lon adue proces s c l ai m ). P E T I T I O N F O R R E V I E W D E N I E D .
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5216 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5216

 To repeal provisions of the Clean Air Act dealing with stratospheric 
                           ozone protection.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 6, 1994

  Mr. DeLay introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To repeal provisions of the Clean Air Act dealing with stratospheric 
                           ozone protection.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF CLEAN AIR ACT PROVISIONS RELATING TO STRATOSPHERIC 
              OZONE PROTECTION.

    Title VI of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 and following) is 
hereby repealed.
                                 <all>
```
# EUR-Lex - 11957A120 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957A120

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY ( E.A.E.C. - EURATOM ), TITLE THREE - PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INSTITUTIONS, CHAPTER I: THE INSTITUTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY, SECTION II: THE COUNCIL, ARTICLE 120 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 120

WHERE A VOTE IS TAKEN , ANY MEMBER OF THE COUNCIL MAY ALSO ACT ON BEHALF OF NOT MORE THAN ONE OTHER MEMBER .
**Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)     I, Randy K. Ferrell, as the President and Chief Executive Officer of FauquierBankshares, Inc., certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, which accompanies thiscertification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of FauquierBankshares, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certificationis made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shallnot be relied upon for any other purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaims anyobligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.        Date: August 12, 2005 /s/  Randy K. Ferrell   Randy K. Ferrell   President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

           Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Michael Timms, Chief Executive Officer and President of Australian Forest
Industries (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: September 14, 2005

/s/ Michael Timms
---------------------------
Michael Timms
Chief Executive Officer and President
§ 95.771 RCRS emission types. Each RCRS transmitter type must be designed to satisfy the emission limitations in this section. ( a ) *Permitted emission types.* RCRS transmitter types may transmit any type of non-voice emission that is technically appropriate for radio control use.
( b ) *Voice emissions prohibited.* RCRS transmitter types must be incapable of transmitting telephony (voice communications).
#### § 95.701 Scope.

This subpart contains rules that apply only to the Radio Control Radio Service (RCRS).
February 4 , 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals GARY MARTIN, PERSONA L REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF

MARGIE T. MARTIN , Appellant NO. 14

- 13

- 00025

- CV V.

CHICK

- FIL

- A, HWY 59 AT KIRBY D RIVE , Appellee

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Chick

- Fil

- A, Hwy 59 at Kirby Drive, signed December 7, 2012 , was heard on th e transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We order appellant, Gary Martin, personal representative of the Estate of Margie T. Martin, to pay all costs inc urred in this appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
§ 64.2115 Registration of Intermediate Providers. ( a ) *Registration.* An intermediate provider that offers or holds itself out as offering the capability to transmit covered voice communications from one destination to another and that charges any rate to any other entity (including an affiliated entity) for the transmission shall register with the Commission in accordance with this section. The intermediate provider shall provide the following information in its registration: ( 1 ) The intermediate provider's business name(s) and primary address;
( 2 ) The name(s), telephone number(s), email address(es), and business address(es) of the intermediate provider's regulatory contact and/or designated agent for service of process;
( 3 ) All business names that the intermediate provider has used in the past;
( 4 ) The state(s) in which the intermediate provider provides service;
( 5 ) The name, title, business address, telephone number, and email address of at least one person as well as the department within the company responsible for addressing rural call completion issues, and;
( 6 ) The name(s), business address, and business telephone number(s) for an executive leadership contact, such as the chief executive officer, chief operating officer, or owner(s) of the intermediate provider, or persons performing an equivalent function, who directs or manages the entity.
( b ) *Submission of registration.* An intermediate provider that is subject to the registration requirement in paragraph (a) of this section shall submit the information described therein to the intermediate provider registry on the Commission's website. The registration shall be made under penalty of perjury.
( c ) *Changes in information.* An intermediate provider must update its submission to the intermediate provider registry on the Commission's website within 10 business days of any change to the information it must provide pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section.
[83 FR 47308, Sept. 19, 2018]
EXHIBIT 23.0




                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Digital Biometrics, Inc.:

     We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Numbers 33-41510, 33-63984, 33-90900, 333-34725, 333-43791 and 333-59067) on
Forms S-3 and S-8 of Digital Biometrics, Inc., of our reports dated November 13,
1998 relating to the balance sheets of Digital Biometrics, Inc., as of September
30, 1998 and 1997, and the related statements of operations, stockholders'
equity and cash flows and the related financial statement schedule for each of
the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 1998, which reports
appear in the September 30, 1998, Annual Report on Form 10-K of Digital
Biometrics, Inc., and to the reference to our firm under the heading "Selected
Financial Data" in the Company's September 30, 1998, Annual Report on Form 10-K
which is incorporated by reference in the registration statements.



                                        KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Minneapolis, Minnesota
December 29, 1998
<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                      Exhibit 21


                               SUBSIDIARIES OF PHYSICIANS HEALTH SERVICES, INC.
                               ------------------------------------------------


                NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                                      JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
                ------------------                                      -----------------------------
<S>                                                                     <C>
Physicians Health Services of Connecticut, Inc.                                 Connecticut

Physicians Health Services of New York, Inc.                                    New York

Physicians Health Services of New Jersey, Inc.                                  New Jersey

Physicians Health Services (Bermuda), Ltd.                                      Bermuda

PHS Insurance of Connecticut, Inc.                                              Connecticut

Physicians Health Insurance Services, Inc.                                      Connecticut

PHS Investments, Inc.                                                           Delaware

Physicians Health Services Insurance of New York, Inc.                          New York

PHS Real Estate, Inc.                                                           Delaware

        PHS Real Estate II, Inc.                                                Delaware
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
31.1: Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications





I, Wenge
Fang, certify that:





1.  I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of China Water Group,
Inc.;




2.  Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.   Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;




4.  The
Company’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have:




a)     Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to ensure that
material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this  report is being
prepared;




b)  Evaluated
the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




c)   Disclosed
in this report any change in the Company’s internal controls over financial
reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the Company's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.  The
issuer’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the
Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the issuer’s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):




a)  All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and




b)  Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the smaller reporting company’s internal controls
over financial reporting.




Date: April 13, 2009
                    /s/ Wenge FangWenge Fang, Chief ExecutiveOfficer
# 2011 UDM/OECD Technical Workshop Day 1
– The UDM

1 November 15 (AM session):  Introductions, scope, agenda (15 min)  Action items and priorities (15 min)  Review of the Collaborative Study Data (20 min)  UDM maximum carrier counts (20 min)  Lab demonstrations and discussion (2 hrs)  Emphasis on standardization of testing across labs

 Test Cultures  Carrier transfers  Volume of media  Neutralization November 15 (PM session):  Update on ATP

-related issues (1.5 hr)  Proposed official changes to the method and AOAC’s perspective (1 hr)

 Report on AOAC Annual Meeting Activities  AOAC method revision process  Procedural changes  Editorial changes  Timeline  Future use of the UDM (1 hr)  EPA’s goals and expectations  Transition to the OECD method

# 2011 UDM/OECD Technical Workshop Day 2
– The OECD Method

2 November 16 (AM session):  Report on OECD Meeting in Paris (30 min)  Review of data from OECD method (1.5 hr)  Product performance data  Neutralization assay  Reference standard  Growth medium  Inoculum distribution  Carrier surface  OECD method demonstrations (2 hr in lab) November 16 (PM session):  Proposed collaborative study of the OECD bactericidal method (1 hr)  Timeline  OECD method implementation (1.5 hr)

 OECD collaborative data

– its potential impact  OECD performance standard(s)  Timeline for implementation  Meeting Wrap

-up (30 min)
Comment Info: ================= General Comment:FAA-2013-0665; Dir ID 2012-NM-082-AD
9StateAgencyAccess‐ActiveTab
Editorial Note on Part 300
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 300 appear at 64 FR 44431, Aug. 16, 1999, and at 76 FR 59305, Sept. 26, 2011.

§ 300.102 Relationship to other treaties, conventions, laws, and regulations. ( a ) Other conventions and treaties to which the United States is a party and other Federal statutes and implementing regulations may impose additional restrictions on the harvesting and importation into the United States of AMLRs.
( b ) The ACA implements the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty. The ACA and its implementing regulations (including, but not limited to, 45 CFR part 670) apply to certain defined activities of U.S. citizens south of 60° S lat.
( c ) The Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1361 *et seq.*), the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 *et seq.*), the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 701 *et seq.*), and their implementing regulations also apply to the harvesting and importation of AMLRs.
( d ) Rule making exceptions. When implementing conservation measures adopted and notified by CCAMLR, NMFS may apply the following exceptions to Administrative Procedure Act (APA) rulemaking requirements at 5 U.S.C. 553(b)-(d): ( 1 ) The foreign affairs function exception of the APA, 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1); or
( 2 ) The exception under subsection 307(b) of AMLRCA, 16 U.S.C. 2436(b), that provides that, notwithstanding 5 U.S.C. 553(b)-(d), NMFS may publish in the Federal Register a final regulation to implement any CCAMLR-adopted conservation measure— ( i ) That has been in effect for 12 months or less, beginning on the date that the Commission notifies the United States of the conservation measure under Article IX of the Convention; and
( ii ) With respect to which the Secretary of State does not notify the Commission in accordance with section 305(a)(1) of AMLRCA within the time period allotted for objections under Article IX of the Convention.
( e ) Annual or biennial measures. NMFS may implement annual or biennial measures adopted by CCAMLR as conditions to vessel permits issued under section 300.107, instead of through rulemaking.
[82 FR 6223, Jan. 19, 2017, as amended at 89 FR 20137, Mar. 21, 2024]
----

----

I Besluiten waarvan de publicatie voorwaarde is voor de toepassing

----

VERORDENING (EG) Nr. 1089/2005 VAN DE COMMISSIE

van 11 juli 2005

tot vaststelling van forfaitaire invoerwaarden voor de bepaling van de invoerprijzen van bepaalde soorten groenten en fruit

DE COMMISSIE VAN DE EUROPESE GEMEENSCHAPPEN,

Gelet op het Verdrag tot oprichting van de Europese Gemeenschap,

Gelet op Verordening (EG) nr. 3223/94 van de Commissie van 21 december 1994 houdende uitvoeringsbepalingen van de invoerregeling voor groenten en fruit (1), en met name op artikel 4, lid 1,

Overwegende hetgeen volgt:

HEEFT DE VOLGENDE VERORDENING VASTGESTELD:

Artikel 1

De in artikel 4 van Verordening (EG) nr. 3223/94 bedoelde forfaitaire invoerwaarden worden vastgesteld zoals aangegeven in de tabel in de bijlage bij deze verordening.

Artikel 2

Deze verordening treedt in werking op 12 juli 2005.

Deze verordening is verbindend in al haar onderdelen en is rechtstreeks toepasselijk in elke lidstaat.

Gedaan te Brussel, 11 juli 2005.

Voor de Commissie

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Directeur-generaal Landbouw en plattelandsontwikkeling

----

(1)PB L 337 van 24.12.1994, blz. 66. Verordening laatstelijk gewijzigd bij Verordening (EG) nr. 1947/2002 (PB L 299 van 1.11.2002, blz. 17).

----

BIJLAGE

bij de verordening van de Commissie van 11 juli 2005 tot vaststelling van forfaitaire invoerwaarden voor de bepaling van de invoerprijzen van bepaalde soorten groenten en fruit

----

(1)  Landennomenclatuur vastgesteld bij Verordening (EG) nr. 750/2005 van de Commissie (PB L 126 van 19.5.2005, blz. 12). De code „999” staat voor „andere oorsprong”.

----

Rectificaties

----

Rectificatie van Verordening (EG) nr. 991/2005 van de Commissie van 28 juni 2005 houdende vaststelling van eenheidswaarden voor de bepaling van de douanewaarde van bepaalde aan bederf onderhevige goederen

(Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie L 168 van 30 juni 2005)

Op bladzijde 12, bijlage, laatste regel „2.30; Ananassen, vers”, derde kolom „EUR”:

in plaats van:

„62,26”

te lezen:

„65,26”.

----
# EUR-Lex - 11957E060 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957E060

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY, PART TWO - FOUNDATIONS OF THE COMMUNITY, TITLE III - FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS, SERVICES AND CAPITAL, CHAPTER 3: SERVICES, ARTICLE 60 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 60

SERVICES SHALL BE CONSIDERED TO BE " SERVICES " WITHIN THE MEANING OF THIS TREATY WHERE THEY ARE NORMALLY PROVIDED FOR REMUNERATION , IN SO FAR AS THEY ARE NOT GOVERNED BY THE PROVISIONS RELATING TO FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT FOR GOODS , CAPITAL AND PERSONS .

" SERVICES " SHALL IN PARTICULAR INCLUDE :

( A ) ACTIVITIES OF AN INDUSTRIAL CHARACTER ;

( B ) ACTIVITIES OF A COMMERCIAL CHARACTER ;

( C ) ACTIVITIES OF CRAFTSMEN ;

( D ) ACTIVITIES OF THE PROFESSIONS .

WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE CHAPTER RELATING TO THE RIGHT OF ESTABLISHMENT , THE PERSON PROVIDING A SERVICE MAY , IN ORDER TO DO SO , TEMPORARILY PURSUE HIS ACTIVITY IN THE STATE WHERE THE SERVICE IS PROVIDED , UNDER THE SAME CONDITIONS AS ARE IMPOSED BY THAT STATE ON ITS OWN NATIONALS .