alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.7


 


BOWX ACQUISITION CORP.


2400 Sand Hill Rd., Suite 200


Menlo Park, CA 94025


 


______, 2020


 


[AFFILIATE NAME AND ADDRESS]


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


This letter will confirm our agreement that,
commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File
No. 333-239941) (the “Registration Statement”) for the initial public offering (the “IPO”)
of the securities of BowX Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) and continuing until the earlier of (i) the
consummation by the Company of an initial business combination and (ii) the Company’s liquidation of the trust account established
in connection with the IPO (in each case as described in the Registration Statement) (such earlier date hereinafter referred to
as the “Termination Date”), [AFFILIATE] shall make available to the Company certain office space and
administrative services as may be required by the Company from time to time, situated at 2400 Sand Hill Rd., Suite 200, Menlo Park,
CA 94025 (or any successor location) at no cost to the Company. [AFFILIATE] hereby agrees that it does not have any right, title,
interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies that may be set aside in the trust account (the “Trust Account”)
to be established upon the consummation of the IPO (the “Claim”) and hereby irrevocably waives any Claim
it presently has ot may have in the future as a result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with the
Company and will not seek recourse against the Trust Account for any reason whatsoever.


 


This letter shall be interpreted in such
manner as to be effective and valid under applicable law, but if any provision of this letter is held to be prohibited by or invalid
under applicable law, such provision shall be ineffective only to the extent of such prohibition or invalidity, without invalidating
the remainder of this letter.


 


This letter may be executed simultaneously
in two or more counterparts, none of which need contain the signatures of more than one party, but all such counterparts taken
together shall constitute one and the same agreement.


 


This letter shall be deemed to be a contract
made under the laws of the State of New York and for all purposes shall be construed in accordance with the State of New York.


 


This letter may not be amended, modified
or waived as to any particular provision, except by a written instrument executed by all parties hereto.


 


[Signature Page Follows]


 




     


     


    

 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	BOWX ACQUISITION CORP.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	 
	 	 	Name: 	Vivek Ranadive
	 	 	Title: 	Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer


 


	AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:	 
	 	 
	[AFFILIATE]	 
	 	 	 
	By:	 	 
	 	Name:	 
	 	Title:	 


 


[Signature Page to Administrative Services
Agreement]
#### § 253.21 Demand by guaranteed noteholder and payment.

Every demand by the guaranteed noteholder must be delivered in writing to the Program and must include the noteholder's certified record of the date and amount of each payment made on the guaranteed note and the manner of its application. The only period during which a guaranteed noteholder can make demand for a payment default begins on the thirty-first day of the payment default and continues through the ninetieth day of a payment default. The noteholder must possess evidence of the demand's timely delivery.
#### § 28.41 Impoundment of abandoned property.

Any property abandoned or left unattended without authority on any national wildlife refuge for a period in excess of 72 hours is subject to removal. The expense of the removal shall be borne by the person owning or claiming ownership of the property. Such property is subject to sale or other disposal after 3 months, in accordance with section 203m of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1959, as amended (40 U.S.C. 484m), and regulations issued thereunder. Former owners may apply within 3 years for reimbursement for such property, subject to disposal and storage costs and similar expenses, upon sufficient proof of ownership.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 178 (Thursday, September 14, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 54294]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7629]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Research Resources; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Scientific and Technical Review Board on 
Biomedical and Behavioral Research Facilities.
    Date: September 26-28, 2006.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Double Tree Rockville, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 
20852.
    Contact Person: Barbara J. Nelson, Ph.D, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Review, National Center for Research 
Resources, NIH, 6701 Democracy Blvd, Room 1080, 1 Democracy Plaza, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-0806.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research; 93.371, Biomedical 
Technology; 93.389, Research Infrastructure, 93.306, 93.333, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 5, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-7629 Filed 9-13-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [File No. 500-1]

      ( print page 54102)    
It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Southwestern Medical Solutions, Inc. (“Southwestern”), a non-reporting issuer quoted on the Pink Sheets under the ticker symbol SWNM, because of questions regarding the accuracy and adequacy of assertions by Southwestern, and by others, concerning, among other things: (1) The existence of applications for U.S. Food and Drug Administration approvals for its Labguard product, (2) the existence of a patent and trademark, and (3) the receipt of an order for the sale of several thousand units of Labguard.

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company.

                    Therefore,                     *it is ordered,*                     pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EST, September 11, 2006 through 11:59 p.m. EST, on September 22, 2006.                

By the Commission.

J. Lynn Taylor,

Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. 06-7654 Filed 9-11-06; 12:03 pm]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas July 21, 2021 No. 04-21-00242-CV ELECTRIC RELIABILITY COUNCIL OF TEXAS and Bill Magness, Appellants
v. CPS ENERGY , Appellee From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021-CI-04574 Honorable Solomon Casseb, III, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R The Appellants’ Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. The appellants’ brief is due on or before August 2, 2021.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 21st day of July, 2021.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0959NACOLE Case Studies on Civilian Oversight: Office of the Independent Police Monitor (New Orleans, Louisiana)The wave of high-profile incidents in 2020 between police and community members prompted widespread calls for greater community oversight of law enforcement agencies. Civilian Over-sight of Law Enforcement: Report on the State of the Field and Effective Oversight Practices, a white paper by the National Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement, outlines the history of civilian oversight including reference to this case study of the New Orleans Police Department and eight others.By National Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement (NACOLE)Categories: Data and AnalysisLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0959Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Jul 2021Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 01:58 (UTC-5) in 0.91 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
- Tenn 1
- [Untitled]
- Tenn 2
- Tenn 3
**EXHIBIT
32.1**
 
 
 **PRECISION
OPTICS CORPORATION, INC.**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 
 We,
Richard E. Forkey, Chief Executive Officer and Jack P. Dreimiller, Chief
Financial Officer of Precision Optics Corporation, Inc. (the "Company"),
certify, pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
  (1)
The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2004
(The "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78 m or 78o(d)); and
  
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.
  
 
 
  DATE: March
18, 2005
   
 /s/
Richard E. Forkey ______________________
 Richard
E. Forkey, Chairman of the Board, Chief
 Executive
Officer, President and Treasurer
 
 
 
 
 /s/
Jack P. Dreimiller ______________________
 Jack
P. Dreimiller, Senior Vice President Finance,
 Chief
Financial Officer and Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 180 (Monday, September 18, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54623-54627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7723]



[[Page 54623]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 06-46]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/ADM, (703) 604-
6575.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 06-46 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 54624]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN18SE06.018


[[Page 54625]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN18SE06.019


[[Page 54626]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN18SE06.020


[[Page 54627]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN18SE06.021

[FR Doc. 06-7723 Filed 8-16-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Can-Cal Resources Ltd., a Colorado
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10QSB/A, for the quarter ended March 31,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
Ronald Sloan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Ronald Sloan,
Principal Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his
knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Ronald SloanBy:
                                  Ronald
      SloanIts:
                                  Chief
      Executive Officer, Chairman/s/
      Ronald SloanBy:
                                  Ronald
      SloanIts:
                                  Principal
      Financial Officer





March 11,
2009





[A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Can-Cal Resources Ltd. and will be retained by it and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
###### Editorial Note on Part 11

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 11 appear at 67 FR 38208, June 3, 2002.

#### § 11.21 Commencement of hearing procedures.

Proceedings under this subpart are commenced upon the timely filing with the Hearings Division of a request for a hearing, as provided in § 11.15 of subpart B. Upon receipt of a request for a hearing, the Hearings Division will assign an administrative law judge to the case. Notice of assignment will be given promptly to the parties, and thereafter, all pleadings, papers, and other documents in the proceeding shall be filed directly with the administrative law judge, with copies served on the opposing party.
Tampa, FL Site

Information Provided by Nick Scappini, HaloSource

08/25/2010 12:24 AM

Jesse-this is a site in Tampa where they were using floc logs and as you can see a ton of different BMP 

measures-they brought in our new dual bio polymer system to replace the floc logs and they were able 

to eliminate almost all of the BMP measures and are currently discharging water at 1NTU or lessincredible (a trash pump, filter bag and some pvc)!

tampa site 002

tampa site 003 tampa site 004
tampa site 005 tampa site 006

tampa site 007

tampa site 008
tampa site 009 tampa site 010

tampa site 011

tampa site 012
tampa site 013 tampa site 015

tampa site 016 tampa site 017
tampa site 018 tampa site 019

tampa site 020 tampa site 021
tampa site 022 tampa site 023

tampa site 024 tampa site 025
tampa site 026 tampa site 027

tampa site 028 tampa site 029
tampa site 030 tampa site 031

tampa site 032 tampa site 034
tampa site 043 tampa site 044

tampa site 045

tampa site 046
tampa site 047 tampa site 048
Dual Biopolymer with Multiple Dewatering Bags

 Pond recirculation (in series configuration)

Notes:

Discharging water through vegetated 

area can further reduce turbidity and 

excess polymer

Always test for residual polymer before 

discharging into surface waters

Place dewatering bag on rock, 

geotextile, fabric, vegetation, etc. to 

prevent scouring

Berms control the direction of flow

Wattles or other methods of ensuring 

sheet flow may be used
§ 23.90 What are the criteria for listing species in Appendix III? ( a ) *Purpose.* Article XVI of the Treaty sets out the procedures for amending Appendix III.
( b ) *General procedure.* A Party may unilaterally, at any time, submit a request to list a species in Appendix III to the CITES Secretariat. The listing will become effective 90 days after the Secretariat notifies the Parties of the request.
( c ) *Criteria for listing.* For a Party to list a species in Appendix III, all of the following criteria must be met: ( 1 ) The species must be native to the country listing the species.
( 2 ) The species must be protected under that country's laws or regulations to prevent or restrict exploitation and control trade, and the laws or regulations are being implemented.
( 3 ) The species is in international trade, and there are indications that the cooperation of other Parties would help to control illegal trade.
( 4 ) The listing Party must inform the Management Authorities of other range countries, the known major importing countries, the Secretariat, and the Animals Committee or the Plants Committee that it is considering the listing and seek their opinions on the potential effects of the listing.
( d ) *Annotation.* The listing Party may annotate the Appendix-III listing to include only specific parts, products, derivatives, or life stages, as long as the Secretariat is notified of the annotation.
( e ) *U.S. procedure.* The procedure to list a species native to the United States in Appendix III is as follows: ( 1 ) We will consult with and solicit comments from all States and Tribes where the species occurs and all other range countries.
( 2 ) We will publish a proposed rule in the Federal Register to solicit comments from the public.
( 3 ) If after evaluating the comments received and available information we determine the species should be listed in Appendix III, we will publish a final rule in the Federal Register and notify the Secretariat of the listing.
( f ) *Removing a species from Appendix III.* We will monitor the international trade in Appendix-III species listed by us and periodically evaluate whether each species continues to meet the listing criteria in paragraph (c) of this section. We will remove a species from Appendix III provided all of the following criteria are met: ( 1 ) International trade in the species is very limited. As a general guide, we will consider removal when exports involve fewer than 5 shipments per year or fewer than 100 individual animals or plants.
( 2 ) Legal and illegal trade in the species, including international trade or interstate commerce, is determined not to be a concern.
( g ) *Transferring a species from Appendix III to Appendix I or II.* If, after monitoring the trade and evaluating the status of an Appendix-III species we listed, we determine that the species meets the criteria in § 23.89(b) through (d) of this section for listing in Appendix I or II, we will consider whether to submit a proposal to amend the listing at the next CoP.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7875

HOWARD CLEVELAND, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

RICHARD L. NEELY,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Loretta Copeland Biggs, 

District Judge. (1:15-cv-00549-LCB-JEP)

Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: March 2, 2016

Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Howard Cleveland, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Howard Cleveland, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order 

is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial 

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the 

merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment 

of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. 

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 

U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the 

dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition 

states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. 

Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that

Cleveland has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 
3

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED