alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 216.13 Prohibited uses, possession, transportation, sales, and permits. It is unlawful for: ( a ) Any person to use any port, harbor or other place under the jurisdiction of the United States for any purpose in any way connected with a prohibited taking or an unlawful importation of any marine mammal or marine mammal product; or
( b ) Any person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States to possess any marine mammal taken in violation of the MMPA or these regulations, or to transport, sell, or offer for sale any such marine mammal or any marine mammal product made from any such mammal.
( c ) Any person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States to use in a commercial fishery, any means or method of fishing in contravention of regulations and limitations issued by the Secretary of Commerce for that fishery to achieve the purposes of this MMPA.
( d ) Any person to violate any term, condition, or restriction of any permit issued by the Secretary.
[39 FR 1852, Jan. 15, 1974, as amended at 59 FR 50375, 50376, Oct. 3, 1994; 61 FR 21933, May 10, 1996]
Academic Year 2022 - 2023

http://ndu.cic.edu

Minimum Admissions Eligibility Criteria:

• Bachelor’s degree (3.0 GPA minimum)

• Civil service pay grade of GS-13 or officer rank of 

O-4

For more information refer to the CIC website.

CFO Certificate 

Courses are based on each CFO 

competency. Students earn the CFO 

Certificate by successfully completing five 

(5) courses.

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 

LEADERSHIP CERTIFICATE

Sponsored by the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller)/Chief Financial Officer and the Chief Financial Officer 

(CFO) Council, the CFO Academy was created in 2008 and is housed within National Defense University – College 

of Information and Cyberspace. As described in DoDI No. 1025.10, Chief Financial Officer Academy, dated June 

22, 2018, the CFO Academy provides accredited graduate level education in the leadership of resource 

management that enables DOD’s efficient and effective use of financial and other resources that supports the 

DOD mission. CFO Academy courses aligns with the financial management competencies specified in the DoD 

Financial Management Certification Program, which is managed by the Under Secretary of Defense 

(Comptroller)/Chief Financial Officer.

Successful CFO graduates will be able to:

• Lead within and across organizational 

boundaries by leveraging knowledge of federal 

budgeting, financial accounting and reporting, 

data management and analytics, risk, internal 

controls, and audit for strategic advantage; 

• Synthesize ethics, theory, practices, and 

technologies to promote effective decisionmaking and accountability across the 

enterprise, improve operations, and support 

financial management excellence; 

• Communicate at the strategic level 

demonstrating command of the topic, logical 

organization, compelling argument, and 

excellence in English grammar and syntax. 
Chief Financial Officer Leadership Certificate 

Course Requirements (5 Courses)

NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY

College of Information and Cyberspace

300 5th Avenue, Building 62 • Fort Lesley J. McNair, Washington, D.C. 20319

202-685-6300 • CICOSS@ndu.edu • http://cic.ndu.edu

Courses

Core (Required)

CIC-6606 White House, Congress, and the Budget

CIC-6414 Data Management Strategies and Technologies

CIC-6607 The Future of Federal Financial Information Sharing

CIC-6608 Risk Management, Internal Controls and Auditing for 

Leaders

CIC-6328 Strategic Performance and Budget Management

Note:

• Strategic Information Technology Acquisition (CIC-6415) can be used to meet the core requirement if any of the 

other courses have been previously taken to fulfill other certificate requirements.

• Strategic Leader Theory and Practice (CIC-6318) can be used to meet the core requirement if any of the other 

courses have been previously taken to fulfill other certificate requirements.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5101

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide that a reasonable attorney’s

fee shall be awarded as a part of the cost to prevailing plaintiffs in

Federal civil actions.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 26, 1994

Mr. LIVINGSTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide that

a reasonable attorney’s fee shall be awarded as a part

of the cost to prevailing plaintiffs in Federal civil actions.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Frivolous Suit Reduc5 tion Act of 1994’’.

6 SEC. 2. ATTORNEYS’ FEES.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 123 of title 28, United

8 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the

9 following:
2

•HR 5101 IH

1 ‘‘§ 1932. Attorneys’ fees

2 ‘‘In any civil action in a court of the United States,

3 the court shall award a prevailing defendant a reasonable

4 attorney’s fee as part of the costs.’’.

5 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

6 at the beginning of chapter 123 of title 28, United States

7 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new

8 item:

‘‘1932. Attorneys’ fees.’’.

Æ
Robison Engineering Company, Inc 846 Victorian Avenue, Suite 20, Sparks, NV 89431 U.S. Department

of Transportation Docket Operations 775-852-2251

-www.robisoneng.com West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Date: December 10, 2015 Washington, DC 20590 SUBJECT:Application
to Ammend Section 333 Exemption No. 11585 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0442 Dear Sir or Madam, As petitioner
of the previously granted Exemption No. 11585 for asense Fly eBee RTK unmanned aircraft (UA), Robison Engineering Company requests anamendment

to change the operational intent. As currently stated
in Exemption No. 11585 the exemption allows the petitioner
to operate anunmanned aircraft system (UAS) toconduct "aerial mapping'. Robison Engineering petitions that this description
be replaced with: "Aerial acquisition, data collection, and inspection,

toinclude but notlimited to, topographic mapping, photogrammetry, real estate photography and videography" Robison Engineering has expanded
its fleet of UAV craft (our petition toadd aDJI Phantom

3 quad-copter aircraft, tracking No. 1jz-81xv-hvgn wassubmitted October 28, 2015). The purpose of this second petition would be toallow expanded services
toour clients, consistent with the capabilities

of our expanding fleet of aircraft and camerasensors. Please let meknow

if youneed anything else, and contactme anytime. Nathan Earl Robison, PE, WRS President, Principal Engineer 775-852-2251

X700 nathan@ robisoneng.com

Page
1 of 1
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Can-Cal Resources Ltd., a Nevada
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Michael Hogan,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael Hogan, Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his
knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.





/s/
      Michael HoganBy:
      Michael HoganIts:
      Chief Executive Officer,
Chairman





/s/
      Michael HoganBy:
      Michael HoganIts:
      Principal Financial Officer





August
16, 2010





[A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Can-Cal Resources Ltd. and will be retained by it and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
#### § 80.1003 Station required.

Vessels subject to the Bridge-to-Bridge Act must have a radiotelephone installation to enable the vessel to participate in navigational communications. This radiotelephone installation must be continuously associated with the ship even though a portable installation is used. Foreign vessels coming into U.S. waters where a bridge-to-bridge station is required may fulfill this requirement by use of portable equipment brought a board by the pilot. Non portable equipment, when used, must be arranged to facilitate repair. The equipment must be protected against vibration, moisture, temperature and excessive currents and voltages.
Summary of Contract of Principle Secured Loan Agreement


 






	
            Lender:
 	
            Nanjing City Commercial Bank
 





 






	
            Borrower:
 	
            Goldenway Nanjing Garments Co., ltd.
 





 






	
            Amount:
 	
            Authorized amount up to $6.41 million
 





 






	
            Maturity:
 	
            within 24 months
 





 






	
            Interest:
 	
            0.4875% per month
 





 






	
            Security:
 	
            Secured by land and the completed constructions of new facilities
 





 






	
            Executed:
 	
            August 15, 2006
**Exhibit 31.2**I, Eric P. Graap, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fauquier Bankshares, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Dated: November 12, 2007
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Missile Defense Agency (MDA).

# ACTION:

Notice of closed meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Missile Defense Advisory Committee will meet in closed session on September 18-19, 2006, in Washington, DC.

The mission of the Missile Defense Advisory Committee is to provide the Department of Defense advice on all matters relating to missile defense, including system development, technology, program maturity and readiness of configurations of the Ballistic Missile Defense System (BMDS) to enter the acquisition process. At this meeting, the Committee will conduct classified discussions on capability-based acquisition.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        COL David R. Wolf, Designated Federal Official (DFO) at                         *david.wolf@mda.mil*, phone/voice mail (703) 695-6438, or mail at 7100 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-7100.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App II), it has been determined that this Missile Defense Advisory Committee meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and that, accordingly, the meeting will be closed to the public.

The need to conduct this meeting was identified with less than 15 calendar days prior to the schedule date. As a result, the meeting notice is being published with less than 15 calendar days notice.

Dated: September 8, 2006.

C.R. Choate,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Office, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 06-7648 Filed 9-13-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
§ 18.81 Prehearing conference. ( a ) After an examination of all the direct testimony submitted pursuant to § 18.77, the presiding officer shall make a preliminary determination of issues of fact which may be addressed at the hearing.
( b ) The presiding officer's preliminary determination shall be made available at the place or places provided in the notice of the hearing (§ 18.74(b)(8)) at least five days before the prehearing conference is held.
( c ) The purpose of the prehearing conference shall be to enable the presiding officer to determine, on the basis of the direct testimony submitted and prehearing discussions: ( 1 ) Whether the presiding officer's preliminary determination of issues of fact for the hearing has omitted any significant issues;
( 2 ) What facts are not in dispute;
( 3 ) Which witnesses may appear at the hearing; and
( 4 ) The nature of the interest of each party and which parties' interests are adverse.
( d ) Only parties may participate in the prehearing conference, and a party may appear in person or be represented by counsel.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 27, 2009

p0518 

# Order

May 27, 2009

137701 & (28)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137701 COA: 284052 Oakland CC: 2003-190080-FH GREGORY PHILLIP KEITH, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 10, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered , and it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to re lief under MCR 6.508(D). The
motion to remand is DENIED.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00406

- CR

William Adrian Roberts

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From Criminal District Court No. 4

o f Tarrant County (1215148D )

September 18, 2014

Opinion by Justice McCoy

(p)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bob McCoy

___________________ Justice Bob McCoy
#### BRENTWOOD VILLAGE CORP. v. UNGER et al.

No. 10644.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued Nov. 10, 1950.

Decided Jan. 18, 1951.

*215Mr. Stanley B. Frosh, Washington, D C., for appellant.

Mr. Stanley H. Kamerow, Washington, D. G, with whom Mr. Allan L. Kamerow, Washington, D. G, was on the brief, for appellees.

Before PROCTOR, BAZELON and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellees, a married couple, were tenants of appellant. They sued for damages for alleged injuries and loss of services caused by the wife’s falling upon a walk alleged to have been maintained by appellant in an icy and dangerous condition. The jury awarded $2500 to the wife and $500 to the husband.

Appellant raises several questions. They involve sufficiency of evidence as to negligence, injuries, suffering, and the amounts awarded to each appellee. We have considered these questions in the light of the testimony. Our conclusion is that the case was properly submitted to the jury and that the damages awarded cannot be adjudged excessive.

Affirmed.
§ 80.773 Co-channel interference protection. ( a ) Where a VHF public coast station geographic area licensee shares a frequency with an incumbent VHF public coast station licensee, the ratio of desired to undesired signal strengths must be at least 12 dB within the service area of the station.
( b ) Where a VHF public coast station geographic area licensee shares a frequency with an incumbent private land mobile radio licensee, the VHF public coast station geographic area licensee must provide at least 10 dB protection to the PLMR incumbent's predicted 38 dBu signal level contour. The PLMR incumbent's predicted 38 dBu signal level contour is calculated using the F(50, 50) field strength chart for Channels 7-13 in § 73.699 (Fig. 10a) of this chapter, with a 9 dB correction factor for antenna height differential, and is based on the licensee's authorized effective radiated power and antenna height-above-average-terrain.
( c ) VHF public coast station geographic area licensees are prohibited from exceeding a field strength of + 5 dBu (decibels referenced to 1 microvolt per meter) at their service area boundaries, unless all the affected VHF public coast station geographic area licensees agree to the higher field strength.
[63 FR 40065, July 27, 1998, as amended at 64 FR 26887, May 18, 1999]
#### § 222.304 Renewal of permits.

When the permit is renewable and a permittee intends to continue the activity described in the permit during any portion of the year ensuing its expiration, the permittee shall, unless otherwise notified in writing by the Assistant Administrator, file a request for permit renewal, together with a certified statement, verifying that the information in the original application is still currently correct. If the information is incorrect the permittee shall file a statement of all changes in the original application, accompanied by any required fee at least 30 days prior to the expiration of the permit. Any person holding a valid renewable permit, who has complied with the foregoing provision of this section, may continue such activities as were authorized by the expired permit until the renewal application is acted upon.
FORM 10-QSB
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-QSB

(Mark One)

[X] Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2000

or

[ ] Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from __________ to _____________.

Commission file number: 001-16063

JUPITER ENTERPRISES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charger)

NEVADA
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)

98-0208667
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

Mezzanine 2, 601 West Broadway
Vancouver, B.C. V5Z 4C2
Canada
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)

1-877-505-6888
(Registrant's telephone number)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]


APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS
DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and
reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan
confirmed by a court. N/A

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

As of September 30, 2000, the Company had 3,042,000 shares issued and
outstanding of its common stock.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one): Yes [ ] No [X]

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements
The information required by this Item is attached at Exhibit 99.15 hereto.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation.
The information required by this Item is incorporated as part of the Company's
financial statements, attached as Exhibit 99.15 hereto.

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.

JUPITER ENTERPRISES, INC.

Date: November 14, 2000

/s/ Tanis Cornwall
Tanis Cornwall, Secretary/Treasurer