alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 76.8 Status conference. ( a ) In any proceeding subject to the part 76 rules, the Commission staff may in its discretion direct the attorneys and/or the parties to appear for a conference to consider: ( 1 ) Simplification or narrowing of the issues;
( 2 ) The necessity for or desirability of amendments to the pleadings, additional pleadings, or other evidentiary submissions;
( 3 ) Obtaining admissions of fact or stipulations between the parties as to any or all of the matters in controversy;
( 4 ) Settlement of the matters in controversy by agreement of the parties;
( 5 ) The necessity for and extent of discovery, including objections to interrogatories or requests for written documents;
( 6 ) The need and schedule for filing briefs, and the date for any further conferences; and
( 7 ) Such other matters that may aid in the disposition of the proceeding.
( b ) Any party may request that a conference be held at any time after an initiating document has been filed.
( c ) Conferences will be scheduled by the Commission at such time and place as it may designate, to be conducted in person or by telephone conference call.
( d ) The failure of any attorney or party, following advance notice with an opportunity to be present, to appear at a scheduled conference will be deemed a waiver and will not preclude the Commission from conferring with those parties or counsel present.
( e ) During a status conference, the Commission staff may issue oral rulings pertaining to a variety of matters relevant to the conduct of the proceeding including, *inter alia,* procedural matters, discovery, and the submission of briefs or other evidentiary materials. These rulings will be promptly memorialized in writing and served on the parties. When such rulings require a party to take affirmative action not subject to deadlines established by another provision of this subpart, such action will be required within ten (10) days from the date of the written memorialization unless otherwise directed by the staff.
[64 FR 6571, Feb. 10, 1999]
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed November 30, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-1678 Lower Tribunal No. F93-15569A

________________ Terrio Knight, Appellant,
vs. The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Teresa Mary Pooler, Judge. O’Brien Hatfield Reese, P.A., and Rachael E. Reese (Tampa), for appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Katryna Santa Cruz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before SCALES, LINDSEY and GORDO, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4947 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4947

    To amend title 28, United States Code, to establish additional 
     requirements regarding appointment of an independent counsel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 12, 1994

  Mr. Bryant introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 28, United States Code, to establish additional 
     requirements regarding appointment of an independent counsel.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONFLICT OF INTEREST; COMMUNICATION

    Section 593(b)(2) of title 28, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by inserting after the second sentence the following: 
        ``In keeping with the purposes of this chapter, the division of 
        the court shall appoint as independent counsel an individual 
        who is without any real or apparent personal, financial, or 
        political conflict of interest.'';
            (2) by adding at the end the following: ``Any communication 
        with the division of the court or any member of such division 
        regarding the qualifications or suitability of an individual to 
        serve as independent counsel shall be made in writing. No 
        member of such division shall engage in oral communication 
        regarding such matters with any individual other than an 
        individual who is a member, or on the staff, of such division 
        or who is being considered for appointment as an independent 
        counsel. The division of the court shall make any such written 
        communication a part of the proceedings and available for 
        review by the public.
                                 <all>
```
1 5

on On March Regulatory !...IV,-,""::a to Air Methods Corporation (AMC). This from 

## §§ 1 Code Regulation (CFR) AMC to temporariiy orairworthiness on board the aircraft, subjectto No. 10741 will expire on April 30, 2015. operations without the registration conditions stated therein.

been no changes to the conditions and circumstances to which Exemption No 10741 was originally granted. Experience with Exemption No 10741 demonstrates that the public interest is served and a level ofsafetyequivalent to regulation is maintained when Air Methods aircraft are temporarily allowed to operate without a registration orairworthiness certificate on board. Exemption No. 10741 remains vital to the public interest, therefore Air Methods petitions the Administratorto extend this exemption for an additional two-yearterm, orfor such longerterm as the Administrator maydeem appropriate. Ifyou have anyquestions concerning this requestfor an extension please contact me at (303)792-7442 or
Overview of Remuneration of Mr. W.K. Lee



 Exhibit 4.24 
 

 
 ASM International N.V. 
 Overview of Remuneration of Mr. W.K. Lee, 
 appointed Member of the Management Board

 effective January 1, 2007 
  

			
		
	Term of appointment	  	4 years
		
	Gross Base Year Salary	  	S$600,000
		
	Pension	  	The defined contribution plan is the same for all employees residing in Singapore. It is governed by the Singapore Law on Central Provident Fund.
		
	Annual incentive	  	A discretionary bonus is determined by the board of directors of ASM Pacific Technology Ltd. every year.
		
	Long term incentive	  	Under the Employee Incentive Shares Scheme, the board of directors of ASM Pacific Technology Ltd. annually may approve an amount of supplemental compensation, which will be used to issue or
purchase ASMPT’s common shares for the designees at market value.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1286/2005

of 3 August 2005         

amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 concerning certain specific restrictions on economic and financial relations with Iraq

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 concerning certain specific restrictions on economic and financial relations with Iraq and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2465/96 (1), and in particular Article 11(b) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 is hereby amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 August 2005.

For the Commission

Eneko LANDÁBURU            

Director-General of External Relations

----

(1)OJ L 169, 8.7.2003, p. 6. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1087/2005 (OJ L 177, 9.7.2005, p. 32).

----

ANNEX

Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 is amended as follows:

The following natural persons shall be added:

----
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0986Columbus (Ohio) Division of Police: Roadmap to ImplementationIn April 2021, the City of Columbus and the Columbus (Ohio) Division of Police (CDP) requested assistance from the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). The COPS Office, in conjunction with technical assistance providers 21CP Solutions, assisted the CDP and community stakeholders with developing a reform plan to help meet their public safety goals. This report, Columbus (Ohio) Division of Police: Roadmap to Implementation, describes the technical assistance conducted and the recommendations made for reform of the CDP's structure, technology, training, and community engagement and lays out steps and a timeline for implementing those recommendations.By Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS Office)Categories: Police OperationsLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0986Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Feb 2023Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 01:53 (UTC-5) in 0.19 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
#### § 95.1789 [Reserved]
<PAGE>

          STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF RATIOS


                                                                   EXHIBIT 12.01

                            SUMMIT SECURITIES, INC.
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                         AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS


   The ratio of adjusted earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends
was computed using the following tabulations to compute adjusted earnings and
the defined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            Year Ended September 30
                                  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     1999             1998             1997            1996          1995
                                  -----------     -----------      -----------     -----------    -----------

<S>                               <C>             <C>              <C>             <C>            <C>
Income (loss) before
 extraordinary item               $ 2,814,828     $ 2,524,027      $ 1,851,240     $ 1,244,522    $   587,559
Add:
 Interest                           5,856,249       4,778,443        4,325,528       3,741,095      3,251,334
 Taxes on income                      529,430         544,034          126,905         237,951        239,707
                                  -----------     -----------      -----------     -----------    -----------
Adjusted earnings                 $ 9,200,507     $ 7,846,504      $ 6,303,673     $ 5,223,568    $ 4,078,600
                                  ===========     ===========      ===========     ===========    ===========
Preferred stock dividend
 requirements                     $   838,356     $   498,533      $   446,560     $   333,606    $   309,061
Ratio factor of income after
 provision for income taxes
 to income before provision
 for income taxes                          84%             82%              94%             84%            71%
Preferred stock dividend
 factor on pretax basis               996,027         605,971          477,196         397,387        435,297
Fixed charges
 Interest                           5,856,249       4,778,443        4,325,528       3,741,095      3,251,334
                                  -----------     -----------      -----------     -----------    -----------

Fixed charges and
 preferred stock
 dividends                        $ 6,852,276     $ 5,384,414      $ 4,802,724     $ 4,138,482    $ 3,686,631
                                  ===========     ===========      ===========     ===========    ===========
Ratio of adjusted earnings
 to fixed charges and
 preferred stock dividends               1.34            1.46             1.31            1.26           1.11
                                  ===========     ===========      ===========     ===========    ===========
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.01


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Phoenix Leasing Cash  Distribution  Fund
V, L.P.  (the  "Partnership")  on Form 10-KSB for the period ended  December 31,
2002 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  I, Gus Constantin,  President of the General Partner,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
              material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  results  of
              operations of the Partnership.

                                                      /S/GUS CONSTANTIN
                                                      -----------------
                                                      Gus Constantin
                                                      President
                                                      March 28, 2003
§ 90.669 Emission limits. ( a ) On any frequency in an MTA licensee's spectrum block that is adjacent to a non-MTA frequency, the power of any emission shall be attenuated below the transmitter power (P) by at least 43 plus 10 log10(P) decibels or 80 decibels, whichever is the lesser attenuation. Note:
The measurements of emission power can be expressed in peak or average values, provided they are expressed in the same parameters as the transmitter power.
( b ) When an emission outside of the authorized bandwidth causes harmful interference, the Commission may, at its discretion, require greater attenuation than specified in this section.
[60 FR 21992, May 4, 1995]
§ 218.13 Prohibitions. Except for incidental takings contemplated in § 218.12(a) and authorized by an LOA issued under §§ 216.106 of this chapter and 218.16, it shall be unlawful for any person to do any of the following in connection with the activities listed in § 218.10(c): ( a ) Violate, or fail to comply with, the terms, conditions, and requirements of this subpart or an LOA issued under §§ 216.106 of this chapter and 218.16;
( b ) Take any marine mammal not specified in § 218.12(b);
( c ) Take any marine mammal specified in § 218.12(b) in any manner other than as specified in the LOA issued under §§ 216.106 of this chapter and 218.16; or
( d ) Take a marine mammal specified in § 218.12(b) if NMFS determines such taking is having, or may have, more than a negligible impact on the species or stock concerned.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.60

RALPH P. BINGGESER
Vice President
Commercial Banking

STANDARD FEDERAL BANK N.A.                               [STANDARD FEDERAL LOGO]
Member of the ABN AMRO Group

2600 West Big Beaver Road
2nd Floor, M0900-290
Troy, Michigan  48084-3318
248/822-5703
248/822-5748


October 11, 2002

Mr. Gregory H. Moses, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer
United American Healthcare Corporation
1155 Brewery Park Boulevard
Suite 200
Detroit, MI  48207-2602

Dear Mr. Moses,

Effective October 3, 2002, Standard Federal Bank waived the financial covenants
for the fourth quarter period ending June 30, 2002. Standard Federal Bank will
amend financial covenants for the succeeding periods under the amended business
loan agreement dated November 29, 2001, section III.A, (1) and (2) as follows:

-    1.30x debt service coverage measured quarterly for the periods ending
     9/30/02, 12/31/02, 3/31/03, and then on a trailing 4-quarter basis
     thereafter beginning 6/30/03.

-    A net worth covenant of $1.8 million for the period ending 9/30/02, $6.0
     million as of 12/31/02, and $8.0 million thereafter beginning 3/31/03.

Please advise if there are any questions.



Best regards,

/s/ Ralph P. Binggeser

Ralph P. Binggeser
Vice President

AGREED TO BY
UNITED AMERICAN HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

/s/ Gregory H. Moses, Jr.
-------------------------------
President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  October 11, 2002
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-11685, 33-88135, 333-49298, 333-106422, 333-110245, 333-112011, 333-113629, 333-116548, 333-125081 and 333-130969) and the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-108343) of Electronics for Imaging,
Inc. of our report dated March 16, 2006 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting which appears in this Form 10-K.



|                          
|--------------------------
|PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|                          
|San Jose, California      
|March 16, 2006
NO. 07-04-0075-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL E

	SEPTEMBER 19, 2005

	______________________________

	IN THE MATTER OF H.S., A MINOR CHILD

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 72ND DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY,

	SITTING AS A JUVENILE COURT;

	NO. 2003-760,673; HONORABLE MARK C. HALL, MAGISTRATE

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS, JJ. and BOYD, S.J.1

	ON JOINT MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEAL

	Advocacy, Inc. perfected this appeal on behalf of appellant H.S. to challenge an order finding H.S. mentally retarded and committing him to the Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation.  Pending before this Court is a motion to withdraw the appeal by which the parties represent that H.S. has subsequently been moved to an appropriate foster home and is doing well.  The parties request that no further action be taken in this matter to ensure H.S.’s current placement.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2).  We grant the motion. 

	Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

						Don H. Reavis

						     Justice
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0919Ten Things Law Enforcement Executives Need to Know About Labor TraffickingLabor trafficking is a crime that involves compelling or coercing a person to provide labor or services and affects persons of all ages, races, genders, and nationalities. Labor traffickers often prey on those with vulnerable life circumstances and economic hardships. Labor trafficking victims can be found in legal and illegal labor industries, as well as hidden behind closed doors and in plain view. This toolkit provides resources for law enforcement, businesses, communities, and other stakeholders to identify, respond to, and address labor trafficking and to support its victims and survivors. This resource was developed as part of the Partnerships to Address Labor Trafficking project. For more information and additional resources, visit https://cops.usdoj.gov/labor_trafficking.By Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS Office), Institute for Intergovernmental Research (IIR)Categories: Nonviolent CrimeLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0919Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Jan 2021Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 00:44 (UTC-5) in 0.23 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
Summary of Arthur C. Graves 2007 Compensation.



 Exhibit 10.20 
 Summary of Arthur C. Graves 2007 Compensation 
 The Knoll, Inc. compensation committee approved an
annual base salary of $275,000 for Arthur C. Graves, with a bonus target of $275,000. Mr. Graves is also entitled to participate in the benefit plans provided by Knoll that are available to Knoll employees generally, including, without
limitation, healthcare benefits, the Knoll Retirement Savings Plan, the Knoll Pension Plan and the Knoll Employee Stock Purchase Plan.