alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
117 STAT. 1174 PUBLIC LAW 108–98—OCT. 10, 2003

Public Law 108–98

108th Congress

An Act

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 with respect to the qualifications

of foreign schools.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FOREIGN SCHOOL ELIGIBILITY.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 102(a)(2)(A) of the Higher Education

Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1002(a)(2)(A)) is amended to read as follows:

‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—For the purpose of qualifying as

an institution under paragraph (1)(C), the Secretary shall

establish criteria by regulation for the approval of institutions outside the United States and for the determination

that such institutions are comparable to an institution

of higher education as defined in section 101 (except that

a graduate medical school, or a veterinary school, located

outside the United States shall not be required to meet

the requirements of section 101(a)(4)). Such criteria shall

include a requirement that a student attending such school

outside the United States is ineligible for loans made,

insured, or guaranteed under part B of title IV unless—

‘‘(i) in the case of a graduate medical school located

outside the United States—

‘‘(I)(aa) at least 60 percent of those enrolled

in, and at least 60 percent of the graduates of,

the graduate medical school outside the United

States were not persons described in section

484(a)(5) in the year preceding the year for which

a student is seeking a loan under part B of title

IV; and

‘‘(bb) at least 60 percent of the individuals

who were students or graduates of the graduate

medical school outside the United States or

Canada (both nationals of the United States and

others) taking the examinations administered by

the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical

Graduates received a passing score in the year

preceding the year for which a student is seeking

a loan under part B of title IV; or

‘‘(II) the institution has a clinical training program that was approved by a State as of January

1, 1992; or

‘‘(ii) in the case of a veterinary school located outside the United States that does not meet the requirements of section 101(a)(4), the institution’s students

Regulations.

Oct. 10, 2003

[S. 570]

PUBLIC LAW 108–98—OCT. 10, 2003 117 STAT. 1175

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 570:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 149 (2003):

July 16, considered and passed Senate.

Sept. 30, considered and passed House.

Æ

complete their clinical training at an approved veterinary school located in the United States.’’.

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This Act and the amendments made

by this Act shall be effective as if enacted on October 1, 1998.

Approved October 10, 2003.

20 USC 1002

note.
# Information Resources Management College News

Information Resources Management College News RSS Feed

- Dr. Frank Marlo Dr. Francis "Frank" Marlo serves as the Dean of Faculty and Academic Programs at the National
- Mr. Stuart K. Archer Mr. Stuart K. Archer is Dean of Administration at the National Defense University College of
- COL Kenneth Miller Colonel Ken Miller is the Dean of Students for the College of Information and Cyberspace at the
- Dr. Jim Chen Areas of Interest:Deterrence, persistent engagement, defend forward, ethics, cyber warfare,
- Ms. Donna Powers Academic Credentials:B.S. Theoretical Mathematics, University of Washington, SeattleMaster's Degree
- Vacant 
- Vacant 
- Ms. Nakia Logan Bio coming soon.
- Dr. Linda Baughman Areas of interest: Authentic Assessment, Universal Design for Learning, critical theory, cultural
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2



                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Gregg A. Waldon, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary
and Treasurer of Stellent, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation (the "Company"),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:



     (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-K, as amended by Amendment No. 1, of
the Company for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully
complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



     (3) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                                  /s/ GREGG A. WALDON

                                          --------------------------------------

                                                     Gregg A. Waldon


                                             Executive Vice President, Chief
                                                    Financial Officer,


                                                 Secretary and Treasurer



Dated: April 21, 2004
Fw: Request for Extension of Comment Period for EPA 's Proposed 1-Hour 

SO2 Standard

Michael Stewart to: Tricia Crabtree 02/10/2010 07:31 AM

Please docket

Michael J. Stewart, Ph.D.

Environmental Protection Specialist

Health and Environmental Impacts Division

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

(919) 541-7524

stewart.michael@epa.gov

----- Forwarded by Michael Stewart/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/10/2010 07:31 AM -----

From: Michael Stewart/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "Kinsman, John" <JKinsman@eei.org>

Date: 02/10/2010 07:30 AM

Subject: Re: Request for Extension of Comment Period for EPA's Proposed 1-Hour SO2 Standard

Mr Kinsman:

I do not anticipate an extension to the comment period but it is our practice to look at comments submitted 

after the close of the comment period to the maximum extent practicable. We understand, of course, the 

problem created by the snow, and given that you have already attached your comments in a previous 

email, we anticipate considering them fully. 

Thank you,

Michael

Michael J. Stewart, Ph.D.

Environmental Protection Specialist

Health and Environmental Impacts Division

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

(919) 541-7524

stewart.michael@epa.gov

"Kinsman, John" Mr. Stewart - 02/10/2010 01:07:48 AM

From: "Kinsman, John" <JKinsman@eei.org>

To: Michael Stewart/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "Kinsman, John" <JKinsman@eei.org>, "Shea, Quin" <QShea@eei.org>

Date: 02/10/2010 01:07 AM

Subject: Request for Extension of Comment Period for EPA's Proposed 1-Hour SO2 Standard

Mr. Stewart –

The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) requests an extension of the comment period for EPA’s

proposed 1‐hr sulfur dioxide NAAQS (EPA‐HQ‐OAR‐2007‐0352).  Due to the snowstorm and

closure of the Federal government and other local entities in Washington, D.C., EEI was unable
to submit the comments by the February 8 due date. EEI is located at 701 Pennsylvania Avenue

in Washington, D.C. and similar to the Federal government was closed for business during

February 8‐10.

EEI requests that EPA extend the formal comment period by at least the three days the Federal

government and other Washington, D.C.‐based organizations were closed due to the

snowstorm.  

Thank you for considering EEI’s request.

John Kinsman

Sr. Director, Environment

Edison Electric Institute

701 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20004

202/508-5711 (p)

202/255-9531 (cell)

202/508-5150 (f)

jkinsman@eei.org
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P293Drug Endangered Children Guide for Law Enforcement: Key Insights for Partnering with Child Welfare, Medical Providers, Treatment Providers, Prosecutors, and Civil AttorneysDrug Endangered Children Guide for Law Enforcement: Key Insights for Partnering with Child Welfare, Medical Providers, Treatment Providers, Prosecutors, and Civil Attorneys builds on the information and strategies outlined in the first Drug Endangered Children Guide for Law Enforcement, which details the core elements, benefits, and challenges of the DEC Approach. For this second guide, the National Alliance for Drug Endangered Children reached out to professionals representing law enforcement, child welfare, prosecution, civil attorneys, medical, behavioral health, and treatment to learn from their experiences to gain a deeper awareness of DEC efforts. The guide discusses the roles and responsibilities of these professionals as well as the ways in which the DEC Approach can change their response to drug endangered children.By National Alliance for Drug Endangered ChildrenCategories: Police Operations • Youth SafetyLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p293Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFBook • Nov 2014Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 02:16 (UTC-5) in 0.19 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
An official website of the United States government "Here is how you know"


Official websites use.gov  .gov
 Secure .gov websites use HTTPS 
	A lock https:


Menu
        ABOUTDirector's Corner
Contact COPS
Community Policing in Action: Photo Contest
The L. Anthony Sutin Award for Innovative Law Enforcement and Community Partnerships
Photo Galleries
Subscribe
NEWSPress Releases
Executive Order on Advancing Effective, Accountable Policing and Criminal Justice Practices to Enhance Public Trust and Public Safety
GRANTSSolicitation Finder
Funding Opportunities
How To Apply
Grants Deadlines and Announcement Dates
Compliance and Reporting
Program Documents
Grantee Success Stories
Award Announcement Map
RESOURCESCritical Incident Review: Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, TX
National Blue Alert Network
Resource Center/Publications
E-Newsletter: Community Policing Dispatch
Podcast Series: The Beat
Video Series: What’s New in Blue
Tribal Community Policing Resources
Community Policing Topics
Community Violence Intervention
Addressing Human TraffickingLabor Trafficking
Recruitment, Hiring & Retention
Filing a Civil Rights Complaint
TRAINING & TECHNICAL ASSISTANCECollaborative Reform InitiativeCRI-TAC
Critical Response
Organizational Assessments
COPS Training Portal
Training
ACCOUNT ACCESS
 Search form
    Search






Community Policing Development (CPD) Program                                                  The FY21 Community Policing Development (CPD) Program is divided into separate solicitations. Please view the following individual solicitation pages for deadlines and information:

**Crisis Intervention Teams**

**De-Escalation Training Solicitation**

**Accreditation**

**Tolerance, Diversity, and Anti-Bias Online Training**

*Please follow us on **Facebook** and **Twitter** and subscribe to the **CP Dispatch**, the COPS Office e-newsletter, to learn about current news on community policing awards, publications and projects.*

Community Policing Development (CPD) Program Documents: 2020 - 2012


SPOTLIGHT


SUBSCRIBE TO EMAIL UPDATES
 
 SUBSCRIBE TO CP DISPATCH


ABOUT Contact COPS
	Community Policing in Action: Photo Contest
	The L. Anthony Sutin Award for Innovative Law Enforcement and Community Partnerships
	Photo Galleries
	Subscribe NEWS Press Releases
	Executive Order on Safe Policing for Safer Communities
 GRANTS Compliance & Reporting
	Program Documents
	Grantees
	Grantee Success Stories
	Agency Portal Video Tutorials
	Award Announcement Map RESOURCES National Blue Alert Network
	Recent Releases
	Resource Center/Publications
	E-Newsletter: Community Policing Dispatch
	Podcast Series: The Beat
	Video Series: What’s New in Blue
	Tribal Community Policing Resources
	Addressing Human Trafficking
	Community Policing Topics
	Recruitment, Hiring & Retention
 TRAINING & TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Collaborative Reform Initiative for Technical Assistance Center
	COPS Training Portal
	Training ACCOUNT ACCESS ACCESSIBILITY INFORMATION


FOIA Language Access Plan Legal Policies and Disclaimers No Fear Act Open Government Plain Writing Privacy Policy USA.gov Whistleblower Protection Social Media Department of Justice Accessibility
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 12

- 904 V

Filed: May 30, 2014

Not for P ublication

*************************************

FAITH L. MACCHIA

, *

*

Petitioner

, * Attorneys’ fees and costs decision b ased on

* s tipulation of f

act

v. *

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

*

*************************************

Diana S. Sedar

, Sarasota, FL , for petitioner.

Lara A. Englund

, Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master

DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS ’ FEES AND COSTS 1

On May 30

, 2014 , the parties filed a stipulation of fact in which they agreed on an

appropriate amount for attorneys’ fees and costs in this case

.

I n accordance with t he General Order #9 requirement, petitioner a sserts she did not i ncur

any out

- of

- pocket expenses in pursuit of her petition. Petitioner submitted her request for

attorneys’ fees and costs to respondent. During informal discussions, respondent ra ised

objections t o certain items in petitioner’ s application

. Based on these objections, petitioner

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation f or the special master’ s action in this

case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal

Claims’ s website, in accordance with the E

- Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107

- 347, 116 Stat. 2899,

2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made

available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is

privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearl y

unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and

move to redact such information prior to the document = s disclosure. If the special master, upon review,

agrees that the identified material fits with in the banned categories listed above, the special master shall

redact such material from public access.2

amend s her request for reimbursement for attor neys’ fees and costs to $ 2 5,500.00

. Respondent

does not object to this amount. The undersigned finds this amount to be reasonable.

Accordingly, the court awards $ 2 5,500.00 , repre senting reimbursement for attorneys’ fees and

costs. The award shall be in the form of a chec k made payable jointly to petitioner and Maglio,

Christopher & Toale, P.A. in the amount of $ 2 5,500.00

.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to R CFC Appendix B, the clerk of the

court is directed to enter judgment herewith. 2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 30, 2014 s/ Laura D. Millman

Laura D. Millman

Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party , either separately or

jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
1 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont 

_________________ 

NO. 09-17-00233-CV 

_________________ 

IN RE S.D. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

Original Proceeding 

418th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas 

 Trial Cause No. 16-06-06557-CV 

________________________________________________________________________ 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 Relator, S.D., petitioned to compel the Judge of the 418th District Court of 

Montgomery County, Texas, to set a hearing on pending motions and render a 

decision regarding access and possession in a suit involving a child in the care of the 

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services. Mandamus relief is proper to 

correct a clear abuse of discretion when there is no adequate remedy by appeal. In 

re Dep’t of Family & Protective Servs., 273 S.W.3d 637, 643 (Tex. 2009). After 

reviewing the petition and the responses of the real parties in interest, we conclude 
2 

that Relator has not shown that she is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the 

petition for writ of mandamus is denied. 

PETITION DENIED. 

 PER CURIAM 

Submitted on July 14, 2017 

Opinion Delivered August 3, 2017 

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
§ 23.87 How does the United States develop documents and negotiating positions for a CoP? ( a ) In developing documents and negotiating positions for a CoP, we: ( 1 ) Will provide for at least one public meeting.
( 2 ) Consult with appropriate Federal, State, and tribal agencies; foreign governmental agencies; scientists; experts; and others.
( 3 ) Seek public comment through published Federal Register notices or postings on our website that: ( i ) Solicit recommendations on potential proposals to amend the Appendices, draft resolutions, and other documents for U.S. submission to the CoP.
( ii ) Announce proposals to amend the Appendices, draft resolutions, and other documents that the United States is considering submitting to the CoP.
( iii ) Provide the CoP agenda and a list of the amendments to the Appendices proposed for the CoP, a summary of our proposed negotiating positions on these items, and the reasons for our proposed positions.
( 4 ) Consider comments received in response to notices or postings provided in paragraph (a)(3) of this section.
( b ) We submit the following documents to the Secretariat for consideration at the CoP: ( 1 ) Draft resolutions and other documents at least 150 days before the CoP.
( 2 ) Proposals to amend the Appendices at least 150 days before the CoP if we have consulted all range countries, or 330 days before the CoP if we have not consulted the range countries. For the latter, the additional time allows for the range countries to be consulted through the Secretariat.
( c ) The Director may modify or suspend any of these procedures if they would interfere with the timely or appropriate development of documents for submission to the CoP and U.S. negotiating positions.
( d ) We may receive additional information at a CoP or circumstances may develop that have an impact on our tentative negotiating positions. As a result, the U.S. representatives to a CoP may find it necessary to modify, reverse, or otherwise change any of those positions when to do so would be in the best interests of the United States or the conservation of the species.
```

[108th Congress Public Law 111]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ111.108]

[[Page 117 STAT. 1325]]

Public Law 108-111
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  440 South Orange Blossom Trail in Orlando, Florida, as the ``Arthur 
 `Pappy' Kennedy Post Office''. <<NOTE: Nov. 11, 2003 -  [H.R. 1882]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 440 
South Orange Blossom Trail in Orlando, Florida, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Arthur `Pappy' Kennedy Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Arthur `Pappy' Kennedy Post 
Office''.

    Approved November 11, 2003.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1882:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 149 (2003):
            Sept. 30, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 29, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
FW: Adulticide products persistence in water

Dave Brown 

to: 

Jordan Page, Linda Boornazian, Allison Wiedeman, Jack Faulk, William Jordan, Susan Lewis 

02/05/2010 02:53 PM 

Cc: 

"'Joe Conlon'", "'Meredith William H. \(DNREC\)'", "'Douglas Carlson'", "'karl roam'", "'Ruckert, 

Edward'", "'Chindi Peavey'" 

Show Details 

Dear Mr. Page:

 

Please find attached tables of what we have found to date regarding the deposition, accumulation, and 

persistence of mosquito adulticides. We will continue to search the literature and provide information we find

 

We had several people working on this through out the country. They all deserve thanks! 

 

Let me know if there is any other info we can provide

 

David Brown

 

Message Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\jfaulk\Local Settings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web6786.htm 5/11/2010
Exhibit 23.2
 
 DeGolyer and MacNaughton
  5001 Spring Valley Road
 Suite 800 East
 Dallas, Texas 75244


March 17, 2010
 
 Abraxas Petroleum Corporation
 18803 Meisner Drive
 San Antonio, Texas 78258
 
 Ladies and Gentlemen:
 
 
 We consent to the use of the name DeGolyer and MacNaughton, to references to DeGolyer and MacNaughton, and to the inclusion of information taken from our “Appraisal Report as of December 31, 2009 on Certain Properties owned by Abraxas Petroleum Corporation,” “Appraisal Report as of December 31, 2008 on Certain Properties owned by Abraxas Petroleum Corporation,” “Appraisal Report as of December 31, 2008 on Certain Properties owned by Abraxas Energy Partners, L.P.,” “Appraisal Report as of December 31, 2007 on Certain Properties owned by Abraxas Petroleum Corporation,” and “Appraisal Report as of December 31, 2007 on Certain Properties owned by Abraxas Energy Partners, L.P.,” (our Reports) under the sections “Item 1-Business General”, “Item 2-Properties-Reserves Information” in the Abraxas Petroleum Corporation Annual Report on Form 10–K for the year ended December 31, 2009.  We also consent to the inclusion of our letter report dated February 19, 2010 in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Abraxas Petroleum Corporation as Exhibit 99.1 (our Report Letter).  We further consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (333-143728, 333-162573 and 333-163763) and Form S-8 (No. 333-17375, 333-17377, 033-81416, 333-55691, 333-74592, 333-74614, 333-135032, 333-15365 and 333-162358) of information from our Reports, our Report Letter and to all references to our firm in such Registration Statements.
 
 
 Very truly yours,
 
 /s/ DeGolyer and MacNaughton
 
 DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON