alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Darin P. McAreavey, Executive Vice president, ChiefFinancial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of Stellent, Inc., a MinnesotaCorporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

(1)   the AnnualReport on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal period ended March 31,2006, as amended by this Amendment No. 1, (the “Report”) fully complies withthe applicable requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(3)   the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
|                            | /s/ DARIN P. McAREAVEY                                                        |
|----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       | Darin P. McAreavey                                                            |
| * *                   | *Executive  Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer* |
| Dated: June 21,  2006 |                                                                          |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) I, Randy K. Ferrell, as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Fauquier Bankshares, Inc., certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Fauquier Bankshares, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.
 Dated: May 9, 2011
/s/Randy K. FerrellRandy K. FerrellPresident & Chief Executive Officer
Editorial Note on Part 300
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 300 appear at 64 FR 44431, Aug. 16, 1999, and at 76 FR 59305, Sept. 26, 2011.

§ 300.208 Alternative procedures for nations identified as having vessels engaged in bycatch of PLMRs that are not certified in this subpart. ( a ) These certification procedures may be applied to fish or fish products from a vessel of a harvesting nation that has been identified under § 300.203 in the event that the Secretary cannot reach a certification determination for that nation by the time of the next biennial report. These procedures shall not apply to fish or fish products from identified nations that have received either a negative or a positive certification under this subpart.
( b ) Consistent with paragraph (a) of this section, the Secretary of Commerce may allow entry of fish or fish products on a shipment-by-shipment, shipper-by-shipper, or other basis if the Secretary determines that imports were harvested by practices that do not result in bycatch of a protected marine species, or were harvested by practices that— ( 1 ) Are comparable to those of the United States, taking into account different conditions, and which, in the case of pelagic longline fisheries, the regulatory program of an identified nation includes mandatory use of circle hooks, careful handling and release equipment, and training and observer programs; and
( 2 ) Include the gathering of species specific data that can be used to support international and regional assessments and conservation efforts for protected living marine resources.
( c ) In addition to any other import documentation requirements that otherwise apply, fish and fish products offered for entry under this section must be accompanied by certification of admissibility, for which a form is available from NMFS. The certification of admissibility must be properly completed and signed by a duly authorized official of the identified nation and must be validated by a responsible official(s) designated by NMFS. The certification must also be signed by the importer of record and submitted to NMFS in a format (electronic facsimile (fax), the Internet, etc.) specified by NMFS.
( d ) Any action recommended under this section shall be consistent with international obligations, including the WTO Agreement.
[76 FR 2024, Jan. 12, 2011. Redesignated and amended at 78 FR 3343, 3345, Jan. 16, 2013]
§ 73.612 Protection from interference. ( a ) Permittees and licensees of TV broadcast stations are not protected from any interference which may be caused by the grant of a new station or of authority to modify the facilities of an existing station in accordance with the provisions of subpart E of this part. The nature and extent of the protection from interference accorded to TV broadcast stations is limited solely to the protection which results from the interference protection requirements set forth in subpart E of this part.
( b ) [Reserved]
[89 FR 7243, Feb. 1, 2024]
Editorial Note on Part 97
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 97 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 97.407 Radio amateur civil emergency service. ( a ) No station may transmit in RACES unless it is an FCC-licensed primary, club, or military recreation station and it is certified by a civil defense organization as registered with that organization. No person may be the control operator of an amateur station transmitting in RACES unless that person holds a FCC-issued amateur operator license and is certified by a civil defense organization as enrolled in that organization.
( b ) The frequency bands and segments and emissions authorized to the control operator are available to stations transmitting communications in RACES on a shared basis with the amateur service. In the event of an emergency which necessitates invoking the President's War Emergency Powers under the provisions of section 706 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 606, amateur stations participating in RACES may only transmit on the frequency segments authorized pursuant to part 214 of this chapter.
( c ) An amateur station registered with a civil defense organization may only communicate with the following stations upon authorization of the responsible civil defense official for the organization with which the amateur station is registered: ( 1 ) An amateur station registered with the same or another civil defense organization; and
( 2 ) A station in a service regulated by the FCC whenever such communication is authorized by the FCC.
( d ) All communications transmitted in RACES must be specifically authorized by the civil defense organization for the area served. Only civil defense communications of the following types may be transmitted: ( 1 ) Messages concerning impending or actual conditions jeopardizing the public safety, or affecting the national defense or security during periods of local, regional, or national civil emergencies;
( 2 ) Messages directly concerning the immediate safety of life of individuals, the immediate protection of property, maintenance of law and order, alleviation of human suffering and need, and the combating of armed attack or sabotage;
( 3 ) Messages directly concerning the accumulation and dissemination of public information or instructions to the civilian population essential to the activities of the civil defense organization or other authorized governmental or relief agencies; and
( 4 ) Communications for RACES training drills and tests necessary to ensure the establishment and maintenance of orderly and efficient operation of the RACES as ordered by the responsible civil defense organization served. Such drills and tests may not exceed a total time of 1 hour per week. With the approval of the chief officer for emergency planning in the applicable State, Commonwealth, District or territory, however, such tests and drills may be conducted for a period not to exceed 72 hours no more than twice in any calendar year.
[75 FR 78171, Dec. 15, 2010]
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

November 5, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00173

- CR

Uzziel N. Munoz CRUZ

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 5

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 549370 Honorable John Longoria , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was originally due September 22, 2021; however, the court granted an extension of time until October 22, 2021. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time has
not been filed.

We therefore order appointed appellate counsel, Staci Krause, to file the appellant’s brief by Novem b er 15, 2021

.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 5th day of November, 2021

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz , Clerk of Court
§ 217.113 Prohibitions. ( a ) Except for the takings contemplated in § 217.112 and authorized by a LOA issued under §§ 216.106 of this chapter and 217.116, it is unlawful for any person to do any of the following in connection with the activities described in § 217.110: ( 1 ) Violate, or fail to comply with, the terms, conditions, and requirements of this subpart or a LOA issued under §§ 216.106 of this chapter and 217.116;
( 2 ) Take any marine mammal not specified in such LOA;
( 3 ) Take any marine mammal specified in such LOA in any manner other than as specified;
( 4 ) Take a marine mammal specified in such LOA after NMFS determines such taking results in more than a negligible impact on the species or stocks of such marine mammal; or
( 5 ) Take a marine mammal specified in such LOA after NMFS determined such taking results in an unmitigable adverse impact on the species or stock of such marine mammal for taking for subsistence uses.
( b ) [Reserved]
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Electronic Filing for Unrepresented Parties - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ERlRzSApJj\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/information-for\/unrepresented-parties\/electronic-filing-for-unrepresented-parties\/\">Electronic Filing for Unrepresented Parties<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/information-for\/unrepresented-parties\/electronic-filing-for-unrepresented-parties\/embed\/#?secret=ERlRzSApJj\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Electronic Filing for Unrepresented Parties” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"ERlRzSApJj\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Registration Process Unrepresented filers interested in filing electronically must create a PACER account and request electronic filing access with the Federal Circuit.\u00a0 Detailed instructions are available\u00a0here (pdf). The Clerk\u2019s Office processes electronic filing registration requests for individual unrepresented filers as received.\u00a0 Please allow at least one business day for processing.\u00a0 A completed Notice of Unrepresented […]"}
#### § 95.2195 LPRS disclosures.

Manufacturers of LPRS transmitters used for auditory assistance, health care assistance, and law enforcement tracking purposes must include with each transmitting device the following statement:

This transmitter is authorized by rule under the Low Power Radio Service (47 CFR part 95) and must not cause harmful interference to TV reception or to the United States Air Force Space Surveillance System operating in the 216.88-217.08 MHz band. With the exception of automated maritime telecommunications system (AMTS) devices, you do not need an FCC license to operate this transmitter. This transmitter may only be used to provide: auditory assistance to persons with disabilities, persons who require language translation, or persons in educational settings; health care services to the ill; law enforcement tracking services under agreement with a law enforcement agency; or AMTS network control communications. Two-way voice communications and all other types of uses not mentioned above are expressly prohibited.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Under Secretary of Defense Personnel and Readiness, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of a forthcoming meeting of the National Security Education Board Group of Advisors.  The purpose of the meeting is to review and make recommendations to the Board concerning requirements established by the David L. Boren National Security Education Act, Title VIII of Public Law 102-183, as amended.

# DATES:

September 27, 2006.

# ADDRESSES:

Four Points by Sheraton Hotel, 1201 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Dr. Edmond J. Collier, Director for Programs, National Security Education Program, 1101 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1210, Rosslyn P.O. Box 20010, Arlington, Virginia 22209-2248; (703) 696-1991.  Electronic mail address:                         *colliere@ndu.edu.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The National Security Education Board Group of Advisors meeting is open to the public.

Dated: August 15, 2006.

C.R. Choate,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 06-7039  Filed 8-18-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
#### § 223.212 Southern DPS of spotted seal.

The prohibitions of section 9(a)(1) of the ESA (16 U.S.C. 1538(a)(1)) relating to endangered species shall apply to the Southern Distinct Population Segment of spotted seal listed in § 223.102.

[79 FR 20814, Apr. 14, 2014]
Hillsborough,

No. 4550.

#### Joseph Ouellette *v.*Alexina Ouellette.

Argued January 3, 1957.

Decided January 31, 1957.

*435*Danais, Loughlin & Danais (Mr. Robert Danais*orally), for the plaintiff.

*Devine & Millimet (Mr. Shane Devine*orally), for the defendant.

Blandin, J.

The questions raised by the defendant’s exceptions are whether the Court erred in granting as a matter of law the plaintiff’s motion to bring forward his original petition for legal separation and amend the decree of legal separation founded thereon to one of divorce, and in denying the defendant’s motion to vacate the original decree and enter one in her favor.

It is true that a legal separation or limited divorce as it is sometimes called (RSA 458:26) is a different cause of action from an absolute divorce. RSA 458:7; *Desaulnier*v. *Desaulnier,*97 N. H. 171, 172, and authorities cited. However, the plaintiff was decreed a legal separation on the grounds of abandonment and *436refusal to cohabit on his original libel as amended. RSA 458:7 IX. It therefore appears the Court found that the plaintiff did and the defendant did not have a cause for legal separation. This issue has therefore become *res judicata (Desaulnier*v. *Desaulnier,*97 N. H. 171; *Poulicakos*v. *Poulicakos,*94 N. H. 233, 235) and so the Court’s denial of the defendant’s motion was not error.

However, a different question is presented by the plaintiff’s motion which asks for further equitable relief. Whether this should be granted him is clearly a matter for the Court’s discretion. *Sandberg*v. *Sandberg,*81 N. H. 317. An examination of the record convinces us that the circumstances here are such that the Court has a strong duty to scrutinize “the total situation” (see *Powell*v. *Powell,*97 N. H. 301, 303) after hearing all the evidence the parties may introduce on the question of whether justice requires that the plaintiff’s motion be granted. *Ela*v. *Ela,*63 N. H. 116, 122; *Bussey v. Bussey,*95 N. H. 349. Since the plaintiff’s motion was granted as a matter of law when discretion should have been exercised, there must be a new trial. *Vallee*v. *Company,*89 N. H. 285, 291. It follows the order is

*Remanded.*

All concurred.
No. 11-9289.

#### Phillips *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, William C. Brooks, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of United American Healthcare
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
      being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
      annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of
      the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

      a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
      controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      controls;

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual
report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: August 30, 2007

               /s/ William C. Brooks
               --------------------------------------------
               President and Chief Executive Officer
               (principal executive officer)
#### § 226.213 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jupitermedia Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Christopher J. Baudouin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Christopher J. Baudouin
---------------------------------
Christopher J. Baudouin
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
August 13, 2004


THIS CERTIFICATION IS MADE SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, SUBJECT
TO THE KNOWLEDGE STANDARD THEREIN, AND NOT FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE.