alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5144 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5144

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to provide that no species 
 may be determined to be an endangered species or threatened species, 
     and no critical habitat may be designated, until that Act is 
                             reauthorized.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 30, 1994

   Mr. Edwards of Texas (for himself, Mr. Bonilla, Mr. Stenholm, Mr. 
Fields of Texas, Mr. Pete Geren of Texas, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. 
Sarpalius, Mr. Armey, Mr. Laughlin, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Frost, Mr. Skeen, 
 Mr. Tejeda, Mr. Young of Alaska, Mr. Brewster, Mr. Pombo, Mr. Condit, 
   Mr. Bliley, Mr. Herger, Mr. Callahan, Mr. Calvert, Mr. Collins of 
Georgia, Mr. Dickey, Mr. Doolittle, Ms. Dunn, Mr. Everett, Mr. Hunter, 
  Mr. Hutchinson, Mr. Istook, Mr. Lewis of Kentucky, Mr. Linder, Mr. 
    Lucas, Ms. Molinari, Mr. Rogers, Mr. Royce, Mr. Stump, and Mr. 
 Huffington) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to provide that no species 
 may be determined to be an endangered species or threatened species, 
     and no critical habitat may be designated, until that Act is 
                             reauthorized.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MORATORIUM ON DETERMINATION OF ENDANGERED SPECIES AND 
              THREATENED SPECIES AND DESIGNATION OF CRITICAL HABITAT.

    Section 4(a) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 
1533(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(4) Moratorium.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
        law, during the period beginning on the effective date of this 
        paragraph and ending on the first day thereafter that occurs in 
        a fiscal year for which amounts are specifically authorized by 
        this Act to be appropriated to carry out this Act, the 
        Secretary may not--
                    ``(A) determine that a species is an endangered 
                species or a threatened species for purposes of this 
                Act; or
                    ``(B) designate any critical habitat of a species 
                under this Act.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 20.82 Records required. ( a ) No migratory bird preservation facility shall: ( 1 ) Receive or have in custody any migratory game bird unless accurate records are maintained which can identify each bird received by, or in the custody of, the facility by the name of the person from whom the bird was obtained, and show ( i ) the number of each species;
( ii ) the location where taken;
( iii ) the date such birds were received;
( iv ) the name and address of the person from whom such birds were received;
( v ) the date such birds were disposed of; and
( vi ) the name and address of the person to whom such birds were delivered, or
( 2 ) Destroy any records required to be maintained under this section for a period of 1 year following the last entry on the record.
( b ) Record keeping as required by this section will not be necessary at hunting clubs which do not fully process migratory birds by removal of both the head and wings.
[41 FR 38510, Sept. 10, 1976]
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON M EMORANDUM O RDER Appellate case name: Jeremy Thomas v. The State of Texas Appellate case number: 01 - 11 - 00258 - CR Trial court case number: 1284896 Trial court: 177th District Court, Harris County, Texas Appellant, Jeremy Thomas, was convicted of murder in the above - captioned case. After he filed a notice of appeal concerning the judgment of conviction, the trial court granted his motion for new trial. Appellee, the State of Texas, appealed the order granting a new trial, and that appeal was assigned appellate cause number 01 - 11 - 00500 - CR. On December 20, 2012, in cause number 01 - 11 - 00500 - CR, this Court reversed the order of the trial co urt granting Thomas’s motion for new trial and ordered that the judgment of conviction and the sentence be reinstated. We simultaneously issued an order, in the above captioned cause number, ordering that if Thomas desires to pursue his appeal from the ju dgment of conviction, his appellate brief will be due 30 days from the date our mandate in cause number 01 - 11 - 00500 - CR issues, and the State’s appellate brief will be due 30 days from the date that Thomas’s brief is filed. On March 8, 2013, Thomas filed a petition for discretionary review (“PDR”) with the Court of Criminal Appeals in cause number 01 - 11 - 00500 - CR. Accordingly, w e abate the appeal in cause number 01 - 11 - 00258 - CR while Thomas’s PDR is pending in cause number 01 - 11 - 00500 - CR. The appeal in ca use number 01 - 11 - 00258 - CR is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active docket. It will be reinstated when the Court of Criminal Appeals finally disposes of Thomas’s PDR and our mandate in cause number 01 - 11 - 00500 - CR issues. T he Court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party. It is so ORDERED.Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes  Acting individually  Acting for the Court Date: April 1 1 , 2013
§ 95.2991 PLB and MSLD marketing limitations. ( a ) No device may be marketed or sold in the United States as a “PLB” or “Personal Locator Beacon” unless it is compliant with all of the rules in this subpart. Previously approved PLBs that do not meet the requirements of RTCM 11010 shall not be manufactured, imported, or sold in the United States beginning January 17, 2020.
( b ) No device may be marketed or sold in the United States as a “MSLD” or “Maritime Survivor Locating Device” unless it complies with the requirements of RTCM 11901. Previously approved devices intended to aid in the location of persons in the water that do not meet the requirements of this subpart shall not be manufactured, imported, or sold in the United States beginning January 17, 2018.
Cheshire

No. 81-297

#### The State of New Hampshire v. Michael McGann

June 11, 1982

*Arthur L. Trombly,*of Keene, by brief and orally, for intervenor Abbott Laboratories.

*Michael McGann,*of Winchester, by brief and orally, *pro se.*

Memorandum Opinion

The defendant asserts that the evidence adduced at trial was insufficient to allow the Superior Court *(Dunfey,*C.J.) to determine ownership of a 1979 Ford Thunderbird automobile. The court was presented with conflicting evidence regarding the vehicle identification number and other matters. It is the fact-finder’s function to weigh conflicting evidence and to assess its credibility. *New Hampshire Supply Co. v. Steinberg,*121 N.H. 506, 509, 433 A.2d 1247, 1249 (1981); *see Streit v. Callahan,*122 N.H. 244, 444 A.2d 495 (1982). There is evidence in the record to support the trial court’s findings. *See New Hampshire Supply Co. v. Steinberg,*121 N.H. at 510, 433 A.2d at 1249.

*Affirmed.*
No. 11-5725.

#### Davis *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meetings. 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committees Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Northeast Oregon Forests Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet via teleconference on September 27, 2006. The purpose of the meeting is to meet as a Committee to review proposed projects for fiscal year 2007.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held as follows: September 27, 2006, 1 p.m. to 2 p.m. in John Day, Oregon.

# ADDRESSES:

The September 27, 2006 teleconference meeting will be held at the Malheur National Forest Supervisor's Office, 431 Patterson Bridge Rd., John Day, Oregon 97845.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jennifer Harris, Designated Federal Official, USDA, Malheur National Forest, P.O. Box 909, John Day, Oregon 97845. Phone: (541) 575-3008.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A public comment period will be provided at 1:05 p.m. and individuals will have the opportunity to address the committee at that time.

Dated: September 5, 2006.

Jennifer L. Harris,

Designated Federal Official.

[FR Doc. 06-7586 Filed 9-11-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-DK-M
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

TIMOTHY SCOTT TURNER

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 343

[ December 31, 2020 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Charles A. Schwab

, Judge; L.T. Case No s

. 562015CF003452A and 562015CF003484A

.

Timothy Scott Turner, Malone, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jessica L.

Underwood, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

L EVINE , C.J., G ROSS and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent
  required by 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Executive
  Officer of Jupiter Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) that, to his
  knowledge:

the periodic report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
      December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      on the date hereof (the Report), fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


|Date: February 24, 2004 | By: | /s/ Michael J.A. Harrop                     
|----------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------
|                        |     |                                             
|                        |     | Michael J.A. Harrop, Chief Executive Officer

---
§ 95.1913 Eligibility. ( a ) An entity is eligible to hold a 218-219 MHz Service system license and its associated individual CTS licenses if: ( 1 ) The entity is an individual who is not a representative of a foreign government; or
( 2 ) The entity is a partnership and no partner is a representative of a foreign government; or
( 3 ) The entity is a corporation organized under the laws of the United States of America; or
( 4 ) The entity is a trust and no beneficiary is a representative of a foreign government.
( b ) An entity that loses its 218-219 MHz Service authorization due to failure to meet the construction requirements specified in § 95.1933 of this part may not apply for a 218-219 MHz Service system license for three years from the date the Commission takes final action affirming that the 218-219 MHz Service license has been canceled.
**Past issues of**
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to the requirements set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersigned, in his capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of Del Monte Foods Company, hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | The annual report of Del Monte Foods Company on Form 10-K for the period ended April 30, 2006, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Periodic
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Del Monte Foods Company at the end
of and for the period covered by the Periodic Report.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: July 10, 2006



/S/ DAVID L. MEYERSDavid L. MeyersExecutive Vice President, Administrationand Chief Financial Officer


This certification accompanies and is being furnished with this Periodic Report, shall not be
deemed filed by Del Monte Foods Company (the Company) for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability under that Section and shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Periodic Report, irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Del Monte Foods Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 221.74 How will NOAA analyze a proposed alternative and formulate its modified condition or prescription? ( a ) In deciding whether to accept an alternative proposed under § 221.71 or 221.72, NOAA must consider evidence and supporting material provided by any license party or otherwise reasonably available to NOAA, including: ( 1 ) Any evidence on the implementation costs or operational impacts for electricity production of the proposed alternative;
( 2 ) Any comments received on NOAA's preliminary condition or prescription;
( 3 ) Any ALJ decision on disputed issues of material fact issued under § 221.60 with respect to the preliminary condition or prescription;
( 4 ) Comments received on any draft or final NEPA documents; and
( 5 ) The license party's proposal under § 221.71 or § 221.72.
( b ) NOAA must accept a proposed alternative if NOAA determines, based on substantial evidence provided by any license party or otherwise reasonably available to NOAA, that the alternative: ( 1 ) Will, as compared to NOAA's preliminary condition or prescription: ( i ) Cost significantly less to implement; or
( ii ) Result in improved operation of the project works for electricity production; and
( 2 ) Will: ( i ) If a condition, provide for the adequate protection and utilization of the reservation; or
( ii ) If a prescription, be no less protective than NMFS's preliminary prescription.
( c ) For purposes of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, NOAA will consider evidence and supporting material provided by any license party by the deadline for filing comments on FERC's NEPA document under 18 CFR 5.25(c).
( d ) When NOAA files with FERC the condition or prescription that NOAA adopts as its modified condition or prescription under § 221.73(a)(2), it must also file: ( 1 ) A written statement explaining: ( i ) The basis for the adopted condition or prescription;
( ii ) If NOAA is not accepting any pending alternative, its reasons for not doing so; and
( iii ) If any alternative submitted under § 221.71 was subsequently withdrawn by the license party, that the alternative was withdrawn; and
( 2 ) Any study, data, and other factual information relied on that is not already part of the licensing proceeding record.
( e ) The written statement under paragraph (d)(1) of this section must demonstrate that NOAA gave equal consideration to the effects of the condition or prescription adopted and any alternative not accepted on: ( 1 ) Energy supply, distribution, cost, and use;
( 2 ) Flood control;
( 3 ) Navigation;
( 4 ) Water supply;
( 5 ) Air quality; and
( 6 ) Preservation of other aspects of environmental quality.
**Exhibit
      32.2**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**




**THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b)**




**OF
      SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)**







Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of
      Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Gregory L.
      Cauthen, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Transocean Inc.,
      a
      Cayman Islands company (the “Company”), hereby certify, to my knowledge,
      that:





(1)
            the
                Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
                2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            information
                contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
                the
                financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





Dated:May
                2, 2007
            
            /s/
                Gregory L. CauthenName:
            Gregory
                L. CauthenSenior
                Vice President andChief
                Financial Officer





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
      63
      of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report
      or
      as a separate disclosure document.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Transocean Inc. and will be retained by Transocean Inc. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.74

Del Monte Foods Corporation

Executive Perquisite Plan

Amended and Restated Effective July 1, 2008

Purpose

The purpose of the Executive Perquisite Plan (Perquisite Plan) is to allow executives flexibility to choose perquisites
tailored to meet their own personal needs, deliver perquisites in a more cost-effective way and encourage a total compensation perspective among executives.

Eligibility

Executives grade level 40 and above are eligible for the Perquisite Plan. Participation begins on the effective date of
May 1, 2004 or at the time of hire or promotion into an eligible position.

Multi-Tier Approach

The Perquisite Plan provides a clear differential between different levels of executives:



|       |  |          |  |  |  |                  |       
|------ |  | -------- |  |  |  | ---------------- | ------
|Tier   |  | Position |  |  |  | Annual Allowance
|Tier 1 |  | CEO      |  |  |  | $                | 42,000
|Tier 2 |  | EVPs/COO |  |  |  | $                | 36,000
|Tier 3 |  | SVPs     |  |  |  | $                | 30,000
|Tier 4 |  | VP III   |  |  |  | $                | 24,000
|Tier 5 |  | VP II    |  |  |  | $                | 18,000
|Tier 6 |  | VP I     |  |  |  | $                | 6,000 

Subject to the Tier designations above, the perquisite allowance will be included on a semi-monthly basis in the
executives payroll check.

Administration

This Executive Perquisite Plan shall be administered by the Compensation Committee of the Del Monte Foods Company Board of Directors (Compensation Committee).

Amendments or Modifications

The foregoing sets forth the Corporations current Executive Perquisite Plan
for Executives of Del Monte Corporation. The Compensation Committee may, at any time, amend, modify or terminate this Executive Perquisite Plan in whole or in part.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





SECTION
      906 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
      OF KALEIDOSCOPE VENTURE CAPITAL INC.





In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kaleidoscope
      Venture Capital Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, the undersigned,
      Ron McIntyre, President and principal financial officer of Kaleidoscope Venture
      Capital Inc., does hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
      ended September 30, 2008 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of Kaleidoscope Venture Capital
      Inc.




Date: November
              19, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Ron
              McIntyreRon
              McIntyrePresident
              and
              principal financial officer
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-05-348-CR

JORGE DAVID MARTINEZ 							APPELLANT

A/K/A JORGE D. MARTINEZ	

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM THE 213TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Appellant Jorge David Martinez appeals from his conviction for felony driving while intoxicated (DWI), enhanced by a prior felony conviction.  According to the judgment, pursuant to a plea bargain, the trial court convicted Appellant upon his plea of guilty to the offense of felony DWI, and, upon his plea of true to the repeat offender notice, the trial court sentenced Appellant to ten years’ confinement.  Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal.

	The trial court’s certification states that this is a plea-bargain case and that Appellant has no right to appeal.  Accordingly, we informed Appellant’s appointed counsel by letter on September 22, 2005 that this court would dismiss the appeal unless Appellant or any party showed grounds for continuing it.2  We received no response.  Consequently, we dismiss this appeal.3

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	DAUPHINOT, HOLMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: January 12, 2006