alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 28.42 Impounding of domestic animals. ( a ) Any animal trespassing on the lands of any national wildlife refuge may be impounded and disposed of in accordance with State statutes insofar as they may be applicable. In the absence of such State statutes, the animals shall be disposed of in accordance with this section.
( b ) If the owner is known, prompt written notice of the impounding will be served in person with written receipt obtained or delivery by certified mail with return receipt requested. In the event of his failure to remove the impounded animal within five (5) days from receipt of such notice, it will be sold or otherwise disposed of as prescribed in this section.
( c ) If the owner is unknown, no disposition of the animal shall be made until at least fifteen (15) days have elapsed from the date of a legal notice of the impounding has been posted at the county courthouse and 15 days after the second notice published in a newspaper in general circulation in the county in which the trespass took place.
( d ) The notice shall state when and where the animal was impounded and shall describe it by brand or earmark or distinguishing marks or by other reasonable identification. The notice shall specify the time and place the animal will be offered at public sale to the highest bidder, in the event it is not claimed or redeemed. The notice shall reserve the right of the official conducting the sale to reject any and all bids so received.
( e ) Prior to such sale, the owner may redeem the animal by submitting proof of ownership and paying all expenses of the United States for, capturing, impounding, advertising, care, forage, and damage claims.
( f ) If an animal impounded under this section is offered at public sale and no bid is received or if the highest bid received is an amount less than the claim of the United States, the animal may be sold at private sale for the highest amount obtainable, or be condemned and destroyed or converted to the use of the United States. Upon the sale of any animal in accordance with this section, the buyer shall be issued a certificate of sale.
( g ) In determining the claim of the Federal Government in all livestock trespass cases on national wildlife refuges, the value of forage consumed shall be computed at the commercial unit rate prevailing in the locality for that class of livestock. In addition, the claim shall include damages to national wildlife refuge property injured or destroyed, and all the related expenses incurred in the impounding, caring for and disposing of the animal. The salary of Service employees for the time spent in and about the investigations, reports, and settlement or prosecution of the case shall be prorated in computing the expense. Payment of claims due the United States shall be made by certified check or postal money order payable to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
**Official websites use.gov****.gov**

**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS 	A lock****https:**

The COPS Office Mass Demonstrations Forum in Washington, D.C.

COPS Office Director, Ronald L. Davis, weighs in on effective police responses to civil protests

Participants

Participants

Rob Chapman, COPS Office Deputy Director for Community Policing Advancement, discusses effective police responses to civil protests

Participants discuss the nature of civil protests and changes in the past decade

Participants

Participants discuss effective police responses to civil protests

Participants discuss effective police responses to civil protests

Participants discuss effective police responses to civil protests

Participant at COPS Office Mass Demonstrations Forum in Washington, D.C.

Participant discusses effective police responses to civil protests

Participant at COPS Office Mass Demonstrations Forum in Washington, D.C.

# SPOTLIGHT

SUBSCRIBE TO EMAIL UPDATES

SUBSCRIBE TO CP DISPATCH

#### ABOUT

                    - Contact COPS
                    - Community Policing in Action: Photo Contest
                    - The L. Anthony Sutin Award for Innovative Law Enforcement and Community Partnerships
                    - Photo Galleries
                    - Subscribe

#### NEWS

                    - Press Releases
                    - Executive Order on Safe Policing for Safer Communities 

#### GRANTS

                    - Compliance & Reporting
                    - Program Documents
                    - Grantees
                    - Grantee Success Stories
                    - Agency Portal Video Tutorials
                    - Award Announcement Map

#### RESOURCES

                    - National Blue Alert Network
                    - Recent Releases
                    - Resource Center/Publications
                    - E-Newsletter: Community Policing Dispatch
                    - Podcast Series: The Beat
                    - Video Series: What’s New in Blue
                    - Tribal Community Policing Resources
                    - Addressing Human Trafficking
                    - Community Policing Topics
                    - Recruitment, Hiring & Retention

#### TRAINING & TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE

                      - Collaborative Reform Initiative for Technical Assistance Center
                      - COPS Training Portal
                      - Training

#### ACCOUNT ACCESS

#### ACCESSIBILITY INFORMATION

FOIALanguage Access PlanLegal Policies and DisclaimersNo Fear ActOpen GovernmentPlain WritingPrivacy PolicyUSA.govWhistleblower ProtectionSocial MediaDepartment of JusticeAccessibility
USDA-Sponsored Calendar Highlights

*******Feb. 21-22**
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Tammy Fountain

Appellate case number: 01-12-00704-CV

Underlying case: In the interest of S.F., a child, No. 2010-31997

Underlying court: 309th District Court of Harris County

We determined that this appeal may be subject to involuntary dismissal for 

mootness. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). The Clerk of the Court so notified the parties, 

advising them that if any party contends that a live controversy remains for resolution, 

that party must so notify the Clerk within 10 days, providing an explanation in light of 

the procedural history why the proceedings should continue and relator’s bond should not 

be released.

Ten days having elapsed without response, we order this case dismissed and the 

bond of relator Tammy Fountain released. See id.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Michael Massengale

 Michael Massengale, Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Massengale, and Brown

Justice Keyes joins this order but would withdraw the December 28, 2012 majority 

opinion and dissenting opinion.

Date: June 13, 2014
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4804

To authorize appropriations for construction of a research facility in Broward

County, Florida, to be used in connection with efforts to control

Melaleuca and other exotic plant species that threaten native ecosystems

in the State of Florida.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 20, 1994

Mr. SHAW (for himself, Mr. DEUTSCH, Ms. BROWN of Florida, Mrs. FOWLER,

Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. YOUNG of Florida, Mr. CANADY, Mr. GOSS, Mr. BACCHUS of Florida, Mrs. MEEK, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Mr. JOHNSTON of

Florida, Mr. DIAZ-BALART, Mr. HASTINGS, Mr. LEWIS of Florida, Mr.

MCCOLLUM, Mr. HUTTO, Mr. PETERSON of Florida, Mr. STEARNS, Mr.

MICA, Mr. MILLER of Florida, and Mrs. THURMAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Public Works and

Transportation

A BILL

To authorize appropriations for construction of a research

facility in Broward County, Florida, to be used in connection with efforts to control Melaleuca and other exotic

plant species that threaten native ecosystems in the State

of Florida.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

4 Congress finds the following:
2

•HR 4804 IH

1 (1) Melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia) is a

2 noxious weed which is changing the fragile eco3 system in and around the Everglades National Park

4 to the detriment of South Florida’s water supply.

5 (2) Although Melaleuca was originally intro6 duced into the State of Florida from Australia in the

7 early 1900s to help dry up the Everglades, it now

8 threatens to permanently replace and eliminate Flor9 ida’s natural plant communities and the animals

10 that live in them.

11 (3) The State of Florida loses an incredible 52

12 acres a day to Melaleuca.

13 (4) According to experts most acquainted with

14 the Melaleuca problem, the best long-range hope for

15 control and suppression of serious, widespread pest

16 plants like Melaleuca is an approach called ‘‘classical

17 biocontrol’’.

18 (5) The major factor that is impeding progress

19 to find a suitable insect to control Melaleuca is the

20 lack of quarantine space. The Aquatic Plant Man21 agement Laboratory presently shares a quarantine

22 facility at Gainesville, Florida, with the Florida De23 partment of Agriculture and the University of Flor24 ida at Gainesville. However, the Gainesville facility is

25 far from the main infestations of Melaleuca, and fa-
3

•HR 4804 IH

1 cility space specifically to quarantine insects to con2 trol Melaleuca is limited.

3 (6) The University of Florida has donated land

4 on its campus in Davie, Florida, where the quar5 antine facility will be located.

6 (7) Although this facility will be primarily used

7 to battle Melaleuca, it will also be used to quar8 antine insects for other exotic plants.

9 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

10 Section 108(c) of the Water Resources Development

11 Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4816) is amended by striking

12 ‘‘$1,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$4,000,000’’.

Æ
### Regulatory Evaluation

Dock e t No
. 

### FAA- Direc torate Identifier:


### - AD !f

yo u mak e cha nges to the values in th e table b e lo w. y ou must ens u re th e total s u p date a ccording l y . 

## If the y do not , cli c k (or Tab ) int o and th e n out o f th e c hanged c ell

. Estimated Costs: Action Costs p er Product (e

. g ., aircraft , engine, (e

. g., Inspection , propeller , appliance) Work

- hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Tota l Cost replacement) (include co st (labor+ 

## u.s. for U.S. Fl eet 

### Do not includ e oncondition cost s her e acc e ss , testing, (@$85/h par ts ) Registere d and close

- up) our) Products Access 2.5 54 ' Remove tube assemblies , 1.0 \ :\·(II 

### .. , 

## . ! q' 54 

### ' I "'). I)( 1 Figures 1 and 2 Clean drain lines 6.0 \ 10

. 011 I (I I 54 H
. l I Install new drain line s , and 2.0 I I) II! $ 17 ,412 ., I 

# .. ii(l 54 I I' insulation blankets Leak check drain 0.7 lines \J "''**~.** 

### ,. •(I 54 I' I Close 2.5 " ) 12.:'0 ., ' 1 \ :,, 54 Incorporate AWL 54-A WL -0 1 into 0.5 

## :,**1::.~,,** " I' •II 54 \ ' 'IJ.;; ll• I 

## MPD


## ., i) (l( I ., () fill .., n nq \ ') ()(I**~** non II (ll} 

# ' I ()II '• nqn r. 1•11 II I II • 

### ·:. I' lf) I I (I( I ttl' ll )II " ;I! 

## ' " (I( \1 110 ' 

## 'J'·''' \ 0 (l() 

### ., I i'l II I (I ' (I 1!11 

## ., 

# ,. II ()If ·, () {)( I 

### ·,. (\ pq \ ( > (\(1 0:, 'I 

### on ' '1\ 

## .. 1)1)(1 

### ·-. f\ I)(,**~** II l il) i)l)tl 

# " I) lj( I 't· IIJ!I I J Ill) \ 0 (10**~.** n 

### no 11 r111 The kn o wn number of products in compliance: To ta l Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $1 , 010 , 016 Costs covered under warranty 

### (if 

### known) $
On-Condition Costs:

. , Action Wor k- hours L abor cost Parts Cos t Cost per Product (e.g. , I n s pection , (include access , ( @ $85/ hour) replacement) te sting , and closeup)

### Spec ial considerations for Economic Analysis (Use thi sfi e ld to explain anything in th e Estimated Costs table that was assumed or mi g ht not b e obvious. Thisfield can also be used to explain warrant y cos ts): 

### Executive Ord er 12866: Co uld the AD be considered a " s ign ificant regulatory



# ac **ti "?**  **~** YES* 

# D N0[8) *Ex planation: 

### DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: I s the AD significant?



# ~ YES* 

# D N0[8) *Ex planation: 

### Reg ul atory Flexi bility Act: Wi ll the AD have a s i g nificant econom ic impact on a sub s tantial number of s mall e ntities? Explain for
e ither a Yes or No answer. - YES 

# D NO [8) Ex planation: 

### Intrastate Aviati on in Al aska: Thi s AD co uld affect in trastate av i ation in Alaska. Is it appropr i ate to include s p ec ifi c requirements for a ircraft operated in A l as ka where aviatio n might be the o nl y mo de oftransp011ation?



# ~ YES* 

# D NO [8) *Exp lanation:
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with      the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act      of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition      and results of operations of theCompany. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely toaccompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section  1350 and is notbeing filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of theCompany, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any generalincorporation language in such filing.

| Dated:  September      10,, 2010 | By:    | A. Noel DeWinter                                                  |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                       |   |                                                              |
|                                       |   | Chief      Financial Officer and PrincipalAccounting      Officer |

----
No. 11-5592.

#### McGrann *v.*Federal Insurance Co.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent required
  by 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Executive
  Officer of Jupiter Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) that, to his
  knowledge:

|**·** | the periodic report
        of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005,
        as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
        (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|----- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|**·** | the information contained
        in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
        condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                         
|

|Date: December 19, 2005 | By: | /s/ Chris Harper     
|----------------------- | --- | -----------------------
|                        |     | Chris Harper,          
|                        |     | Chief Executive Officer

---
#### § 23.37 What are the requirements for a re-export certificate?

(a) *Purposes.* Articles III, IV, and V of the Treaty set out the conditions under which a Management Authority may issue a re-export certificate for an Appendix-I, -II, or -III specimen.

(b) *U.S. application forms.* Complete the appropriate form for the proposed activity and submit it to the U.S. Management Authority. Form 3-200-73 may also be submitted to Law Enforcement at certain ports or regional offices:

| Type of application for a re-export certificate | Form no. |
| --- | --- |
| (1) CITES: Biological Specimens Plants Single-use Permits under a Master File or an Annual Program File Trophies by Taxidermists Wildlife | 3-200-29 3-200-32 3-200-74 3-200-28 3-200-73 |
| (2) Endangered Species Act and CITES: ESA Plants ESA Wildlife | 3-200-36 3-200-37 |
| (3) Marine Mammal Protection Act and CITES: Biological Samples Live Captive-held Marine Mammals | 3-200-29 3-200-53 |

(c) *Criteria.* The criteria in this [paragraph (c)](/on/2024-09-20/title-50/section-23.37#p-23.37(c)) apply to the issuance and acceptance of U.S. and foreign re-export certificates. When applying for a U.S. certificate, you must provide sufficient information for us to find that your proposed activity meets all of the following criteria:

| Criteria for a re-export certificate | Appendix of the specimen | | | Section |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| I | II | III |
| (1) The wildlife or plant was legally acquired. | Yes | Yes | Yes | 23.60 |
| (2) The scientific name of the species is the standard nomenclature in the CITES Appendices or the references adopted by the CoP. | Yes | Yes | Yes | 23.23 |
| (3) For a live specimen, an import permit has already been issued or the Management Authority of the importing country has confirmed that it will be issued. This criterion does not apply to a specimen with the source code “D.” | Yes | n/a | n/a | 23.35 |
| (4) Live wildlife or plants will be prepared and shipped so as to minimize risk of injury, damage to health, or cruel treatment of the specimen. | Yes | Yes | Yes | 23.23 |
| (5) For re-export of a confiscated specimen, the proposed re-export would not be detrimental to the survival of the species. | Yes | Yes | n/a | 23.61 |
| (6) For wildlife with the source code “W” or “F,” the re-export is for noncommercial purposes. | Yes | n/a | n/a | - |
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**


**THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b)**


**OF
      SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)**







Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of
      Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Gregory L.
      Cauthen, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Transocean Inc.,
      a
      Cayman Islands company (the “Company”), hereby certify, to my knowledge,
      that:





(1)
            the
                Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
                2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            information
                contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
                the
                financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
              Gregory L. CauthenDated:May
                4, 2006
            Name:
            Gregory
                L. CauthenSenior Vice
              President
              andChief Financial Officer





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
      63
      of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report
      or
      as a separate disclosure document.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Transocean Inc. and will be retained by Transocean Inc. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5292 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5292

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
To amend the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 to extend 
  the deadline for the submission of nominations for the Defense Base 
                  Closure and Realignment Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUBMISSION OF NOMINATIONS FOR DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE AND 
              REALIGNMENT COMMISSION.

    Section 2902(c)(1)(B)(iii) of the Defense Base Closure and 
Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX 
of Public Law 101-510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) is amended by striking out 
``January 3, 1995'' and inserting in lieu thereof ``January 4, 1995''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 29, 1994.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.
                                     







103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5292

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 to extend 
  the deadline for the submission of nominations for the Defense Base 
                  Closure and Realignment Commission.`
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 0Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherNo items found matching your search.Click here to see the entire catalog.Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 02:32 (UTC-5) in 0.20 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive