alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5108 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5108

            To extend the Export Administration Act of 1979.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 27, 1994

  Mr. Hamilton (for himself and Mr. Gilman) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To extend the Export Administration Act of 1979.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 20 of the 
Export Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 2419) is amended by 
striking ``August 20, 1994'' and inserting ``September 30, 1995''.
                                 <all>
```
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5176

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act relating to San Diego

ocean discharge and waste water reclamation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 5, 1994

Mr. FILNER (for himself, Ms. SCHENK, and Mr. CUNNINGHAM) introduced the

following bill; which was referred jointly to the Committees on Public

Works and Transportation and Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act relating

to San Diego ocean discharge and waste water reclamation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ocean Pollution Re5 duction Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. SAN DIEGO OCEAN DISCHARGE AND WASTE WATER

7 RECLAMATION.

8 Section 301(j) of the Federal Water Pollution Control

9 Act (33 U.S.C. 1311(j)) is amended—
2

•HR 5176 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (1)(A) by inserting before the

2 semicolon at the end the following: ‘‘, and except as

3 provided in paragraph (5)’’; and

4 (2) by adding at the end the following new

5 paragraph:

6 ‘‘(5) EXTENSION OF APPLICATION DEADLINE.—

7 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In the 180-day period

8 beginning on the date of the enactment of this

9 paragraph, the city of San Diego, California,

10 may apply for a modification pursuant to sub11 section (h) of the requirements of subsection

12 (b)(1)(B) with respect to biological oxygen de13 mand and total suspended solids in the effluent

14 discharged into marine waters.

15 ‘‘(B) APPLICATION.—An application under

16 this paragraph shall include a commitment by

17 the applicant to implement a waste water rec18 lamation program that, at a minimum, will—

19 ‘‘(i) achieve a system capacity of

20 45,000,000 gallons of reclaimed waste

21 water per day by January 1, 2010;

22 ‘‘(ii) result in a reduction in the quan23 tity of suspended solids discharged by the

24 applicant into the marine environment dur25 ing the period of the modification.
3

•HR 5176 IH

1 ‘‘(C) ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS.—The Ad2 ministrator may not grant a modification pur3 suant to an application submitted under this

4 paragraph unless the Administrator determines

5 that such modification will result in removal of

6 not less than 58 percent of the biological oxy7 gen demand (on an annual average) and not

8 less than 80 percent of total suspended solids

9 (on a monthly average) in the discharge to

10 which the application applies.

11 ‘‘(D) PRELIMINARY DECISION DEAD12 LINE.—The Administrator shall announce a

13 preliminary decision on an application submit14 ted under this paragraph not later than 1 year

15 after the date the application is submitted.’’.

Æ
EPA Meeting with HCNA LLC May 9 , 2012 **Attendees:** EPA OUST: Liz McDermott, Linda Gerber , Paul Miller, Tim Roberts, Erin Knighton, Cho Yi Kwan , Tim Smith HCNA LLC : Karl Overman Alan Anderson and Associates: Alan Anderson At this meeting EPA and the HCNA discussed the proposed changes to the UST regulations

. The discussion focused on the proposed changes to previously deferred airport hydrant sy stems and release detection on these s ys tems.
§ 90.719 Individual channels available for assignment in the 220-222 MHz band. ( a ) Channels 171 through 200 are available to both Government and non-Government Phase I applicants, and may be assigned singly or in contiguous channel groups.
( b ) Channels 171 through 180 are available for any use by Phase I applicants consistent with this subpart.
( c ) Channels 181 through 185 are set aside in Phase II for emergency medical use for applicants that meet the eligibility criteria of § 90.20(a)(1)(iii) or § 90.20(a)(2)(xiii).
( d ) Channels 161 through 170 and 181 through 185 are the only 220-222 MHz channels available to Phase II non-nationwide, Government users.
[62 FR 15994, Apr. 3, 1997, as amended at 62 FR 18936, Apr. 17, 1997]
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5182

To adjust the designation of controlled airspace around the Dallas/Fort Worth

Airport, Texas, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 5, 1994

Mr. BARTON of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Public Works and Transportation

A BILL

To adjust the designation of controlled airspace around the

Dallas/Fort Worth Airport, Texas, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF CONTROLLED AIRSPACE.

4 (a) GENERAL RULE.—The Administrator of the Fed5 eral Aviation Administration shall take appropriate action

6 to move that portion of the controlled airspace boundary

7 around the Dallas/Fort Worth Airport, Texas, that is cur8 rently at 7 miles from the airport to 8 miles from the air9 port. The Administrator shall take appropriate action to

10 provide for the depiction and publication of such changes.
2

•HR 5182 IH

1 (b) CONTROLLED AIRSPACE BOUNDARY.—For pur2 poses of this section, the term ‘‘controlled airspace bound3 ary’’ means the boundary around the Dallas/Fort Worth

4 Airport, Texas, which separates airspace controlled by the

5 Federal Aviation Administration from the surface to

6 10,000 feet from the airspace controlled by the Adminis7 tration around the airport from 2,000 feet to 10,000 feet.

8 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

9 Section 1 shall take effect 120 days after the date

10 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
§ 76.1800 Additional reports and filings. In addition to the reports and filings required by this subpart, cable operators must provide all notifications which are required by § 1.1155 of this chapter (annual regulatory user fees). In addition, all cable systems subject to rate regulation must file FCC rate forms pursuant to the Commission's rate rules contained in subparts N and R of this part. Note 1 to § 76.1800 :
Cable operators are required by the Copyright Act to make semi-annual filings of Statements of Account with the Licensing Division of the Copyright Office, Library of Congress, Washington, DC 20557.
Note 2 to § 76.1800 :
The Commission may require certain financial information to be submitted pursuant to Section 623(g) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 543(g).
§ 80.141 General provisions for ship stations. ( a ) *Points of communication.* Ship stations and marine utility stations on board ships are authorized to communicate with any station in the maritime mobile service.
( b ) *Service requirements for all ship stations.* ( 1 ) Each ship station must receive and acknowledge all communications which are addressed to the ship or to any person on board.
( 2 ) Every ship, on meeting with any direct danger to the navigation of other ships such as ice, a derelict vessel, a tropical storm, subfreezing air temperatures associated with gale force winds causing severe icing on superstructures, or winds of force 10 or above on the Beaufort scale for which no storm warning has been received, must transmit related information to ships in the vicinity and to the authorities on land unless such action has already been taken by another station. All such radio messages must be preceded by the safety signal.
( 3 ) A ship station may accept communications for retransmission to any other station in the maritime mobile service. Whenever such messages or communications have been received and acknowledged by a ship station for this purpose, that station must retransmit the message as soon as possible.
( c ) *Service requirements for vessels.* Each ship station provided for compliance with Part II of Title III of the Communications Act must provide a public correspondence service on voyages of more than 24 hours for any person who requests the service. Compulsory radiotelephone ships must provide this service for at least four hours daily. The hours must be prominently posted at the principal operating location of the station.
( d ) Operating conditions. Effective August 1, 1994, VHF hand-held, portable transmitters used while connected to an external power source or a ship antenna must be equipped with an automatic timing device that deactivates the transmitter and reverts the transmitter to the receive mode after an uninterrupted transmission period of five minutes, plus or minus 10 percent. Additionally, such transmitters must have a device that indicates when the automatic timer has deactivated the transmitter. See also § 80.203(c).
[51 FR 31213, Sept. 2, 1986, as amended at 56 FR 57988, Nov. 15, 1991; 68 FR 46961, Aug. 7, 2003]
#### § 73.4099 Financial qualifications, certification of.

See Public Notice, FCC 87-97, adopted March 19, 1987. 52 FR 17333, May 7, 1987.

[53 FR 2499, Jan. 28, 1988]
#### § 26.24 Exception for entry when accompanied by refuge personnel.

A permit is not required for access to any part of a national wildlife refuge by a person when accompanied by refuge personnel.
P. 1



# RCRA Box 321 Prepped by Ryan Dugan



## Document

Number: 

# 214)OGRC-S001 5 Docket Number: 

# F-93-OGRC-FFFF F

Printed 5/8/2007 3:36:31 PM

Sheet 214 of 259P. 2 

## O&RC- SOOtf

A . A . OILFIEL D SERVICE , INC . Augus t A . Peters , Jr. , President Pos t Offic e Bo x 520 8 Cyri l A . Scheller , Vice-President HOBBS , NE WMEXIC O 88241-520 8 Barr y A . Peters , Vice-President

Octobe r 30 , 199 0

Mr . Bo b Tonett i Mai l Cod e O S 320 W 40 1 M Stree t S.W . Washington , D.C . 2046 0 Dea r Bob , I wan t t o than

k yo u fo r coming t o Southeaster n Ne wMexic o t o visi t th e Parab o an

d A.A . Oilfiel d Servic e crud e oi l reclamatio n facilities . A s yo u ca n tel l crud e oi l reclaimer s provid e a ver yvaluabl e functio n i n the oi l industr

ya s wel l a s t o the environment . I hav e give n a grea t dea l o f though t abou t the possibl e solution s t o thi s dilemma . Pleas e le t m e shar e the mwit h you . 1 . EXEMP T TH E CRUDE OI L RECLAIMER S ALTOGETHER . Crud e oi l reclaimer s wer e wrongfull yinclude d i n the non-exemp t status . Thi s ca n be don e b yclearl ydefining crud e oi l reclaimers . E& P waste s handle d b ycrud e oi l reclaimer s ar e n o differen t than producer' s stoc k oi l tan k waste s whic h ar e exempte d wastes . 2. . Exemp t crud e oi l reclaimer s unde r the TCL P rul e BO T ADOP T TH E IOCC PROPOSAL S FO RSIT E PERMITTING , EMERGENC Y RESPONSE , COMPLIANC E INSPECTIONS , FINANCIA L ASSURANCE , WAST E TRACKIN

GAN D MANIFESTING , CLOSURE , AN D STAT E AGENC YFUNDING . Thi s approac h offer s flexibilit yi n dealing wit h the problemnationwid e an d doe s no t throw reclaimer' s waste s an d facilitie s i n the same classi

ificatio n a s everyon e els e tha t woul d generat e a TCL P "Hazardou s Waste. " 3 . LEAV

E TH E CRUDE OI L RECLAIMER S WHER E THEYAR E UNDE R CURREN T REGULATIO

N A S OF SEPTEMBE

R25 , 1990 . Thi s i s unacceptabl e an

d i s directl ycontraryt o the E.P.A . polic yo f wast e minimization , wast e segregatio n i n the oilfield , an

d minimizing disposa l o f wast e crud e oi l o n sit e o r i n exemp t landfills .P. 3



# 1

I kno w yo uare ver y

awar e o f the seriousnes s o f thi s problem . I appreciat e yo uan dyou r staf f fo r recognizin g the problem an ddealin g wit hi t accordingly . I hav e th e upmos t fait htha t a workabl e an d practica l solutio nwil l be foundt o accomplis hthe goal s o f bot hthe crude oi l reclaimer s an d the E.P.A . polic y o f environmenta l respon sibility . Pleas e fee l fre e t o cal l i f any question s migh t arise , to hearin g fro

m you . I loo k forwar d

Barny A . Peter s Vice-Presiden t cc : Denni s Rudd y
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5220

AN ACT

To provide for the acceptance by the Secretary of Education

of applications submitted by the local educational agency

serving the Window Rock Unified School District, Window Rock, Arizona, under section 3 of the Act of September 30, 1950 (Public Law 874, 81st Congress) for

fiscal years 1994 and 1995.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 5220 EH

1 SECTION 1. APPLICATION BY WINDOW ROCK, ARIZONA,

2 LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCY FOR FUNDING

3 UNDER SECTION 3 OF PUBLIC LAW 874, 81ST

4 CONGRESS.

5 Notwithstanding section 5(a)(2) of the Act of Sep6 tember 30, 1950 (Public Law 874, 81st Congress; 20

7 U.S.C. 240(a)(2)) (as such section was in effect on the

8 day before the date of the enactment of the Improving

9 America’s Schools Act of 1994), the Secretary of Edu10 cation shall accept from the local educational agency serv11 ing the Window Rock Unified School District, Window

12 Rock, Arizona, applications for funding under section 3

13 of the Act of September 30, 1950 (as so in effect) for

14 fiscal years 1994 and 1995 as if such applications were

15 timely received in accordance with section 222.10(a)(1) of

16 title 34, Code of Federal Regulations.

Passed the House of Representatives October 7,

1994.

Attest:

Clerk.

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5220

AN ACT

To provide for the acceptance by the Secretary of

years 1994 and 1995.1950 (Public Law 874, 81st Congress) for fiscalunder section 3 of the Act of September 30,Unified School District, Window Rock, Arizona,educational agency serving the Window RockEducation of applications submitted by the local
69–008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 106–28

PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 514, THE

WIRELESS PRIVACY ENHANCEMENT ACT OF 1999

FEBRUARY 23, 1999.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. LINDER, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 77]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 77, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 514, the

‘‘Wireless Privacy Enhancement Act of 1999’’ under an open rule.

The rule provides one hour of general debate divided equally between the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Commerce.

The rule waives points of order against consideration of the bill

for failure to comply with clause 4(a) of rule XIII (requiring a

three-day layover of the committee report). The Commerce Committee report was filed on Tuesday, February 23, and the bill will possibly be considered on the floor as early as Wednesday, February

24. The rule further provides that each section of the bill shall be

considered as read.

The Chair is authorized to accord priority in recognition to Members who have preprinted their amendments in the Congressional

Record. The rule allows for the Chairman of the Committee of the

Whole to postpone votes during consideration of the bill, and to reduce voting time to five minutes on a postponed question if the vote

follows a fifteen minute vote. Finally, the rule provides for one motion to recommit, with or without instructions.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.2: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of China Water Group, Inc. (the “Registrant”) certifies that:




1.           The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and




2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Date:  December 14, 2011
/s/ Ding RencaiDing Rencai, Chief Financial Officer
#### § 95.1769 [Reserved]
#### EDMUND A. SAUNDERS, ALEXANDER WALKER and THOMAS F. POLLARD, Appellants, *v.*JANE IRWIN, Respondent, Impleaded with others.

*Levy by*sheriff— *Injunction to prevent sale on the ground that otherwise the rights of firm creditors will be impeinlled*— *denied*— *Presumption that the sheriff will sell, in accordance with the legal rights of parties.*

Appeal from an order made at a Special Term vacating an order of injunction.

The plaintiffs claim to be partnership creditors of the firm of Tooker *&*Irwin, composed of the defendants, Tooker and Thomas J. Irwin, alleging some $2,400 to be due them from said firm for goods sold and delivered. Of this amount only $845.71 is in judgment. Execution was issued on this judgment to the sheriff of the city and county of New York, January 17, 1879.

The defendant Jane Irwin, on the 17th January, 1879, recovered judgment in this court for $7,496.17 against the said Tooker and Thomas J. Irwin, and the defendants Candee and Arnold, the four composing the firm of Tooker, Arnold *&*Co. Jane Irwin, on January seventeenth, issued execution on her judgment to the sheriff of the city and county of New York. Tooker *&*Irwin’s prop*343erty was levied upon under the last mentioned execution, and advertised for sale by the sheriff. The plaintiffs alleging that the firm of Toolcer & Irwin was insolvent brought this action on behalf of themselves and other creditors, and prayed for an injunction restraining the sale, except subject to the payment of the firm debts and the settlement of firm accounts. Thereupon the plaintiffs on the 30th of January, 1879, obtained, an injunction staying the sale, with an order to show cause why same should not be continued to judgment, returnable February 5, 1879.

The court at General Term said : “The question presented on this appeal is whether upon the facts stated in the complaint equity will interfere to give the relief prayed for. We think the plaintiff fails to show any case for the interference of a court of equity. The rights of the sheriff to make a levy and sale are clearly defined. If he went beyond those rights, and sold the whole interest in the property and delivered the same to the purchaser, he would himself be a trespasser. It must be presumed that the sheriff intended to sell in accordance with his legal rights, and a court of equity will not interfere on such a state of facts, simply, by injunction to compel officers to do their duty. The legal rights of the creditors of the firm could not be affected by a sale made by the sheriff.”

The order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

*Henry De Forest Wee/ces*and *George H.*Forster, for the appellants. *Edward T.*Bartlett, for the respondent, Jane Irwin.

Opinion

*per Curiam.*

Present — Davis, P. J., Brady and Potter, JJ.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
#### § 20.101 Seasons, limits and shooting hours for Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands.

This section provides for the annual hunting of certain doves, pigeons, ducks, coots, gallinules and snipe in Puerto Rico; and for certain doves, pigeons and ducks in the Virgin Islands. In these Commonwealths, the hunting of waterfowl and coots (and other certain species, as applicable) must be with the use of nontoxic shot beginning in the 1991-92 waterfowl season.

[53 FR 24290, June 28, 1988]

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations affecting annual regulatory schedules for this section, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

The following is a list of subsidiaries of the Company as of December 31, 2009, omitting subsidiaries which, considered in the
aggregate, would not constitute a significant subsidiary.



|                                  |  |                                          
|--------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
|Name                              |  | State or Sovereign Power of Incorporation
|LED Systems K.K.                  |  | Japan                                    
|Lighting Partner B.V.             |  | The Netherlands                          
|Lighting Science Coöperatief U.A. |  | The Netherlands                          
|Lighting Science Group Limited    |  | United Kingdom                           
|LLI Acquisition, Inc.             |  | Delaware                                 
|LSGC Pty. Ltd                     |  | Australia                                
|LSGC LLC                          |  | Delaware