alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 172 (Wednesday, September 6, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 52426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7458]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2006-24243; Airspace Docket No. 06-AWP-11]
RIN 2120-AA66


Revocation of Class D Airspace; Elko, NV

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION:  Direct final rule, confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document confirms the effective date of the direct final 
rule which revokes a Class D Airspace at Elko, NV.

DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC October 26, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Tonish, Western Terminal 
Operations Airspace Specialist, AWP-5420.1, Federal Aviation 
Administration, 15000 Aviation Boulevard, Lawndale, California 90261, 
telephone (310) 725-6539.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on July 18, 2006 
(17 FR 40651). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a 
non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no 
adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that 
no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse 
comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse 
comment, were received with the comment period, the regulation will 
become effective on October 26, 2006, as per the direct final rule. No 
adverse comments were received, and thus this notice confirms that this 
direct final rule will become effective on that date.

    Issued in Los Angeles, California, on August 23, 2006.
Leonard Mobley,
Acting Director, Western Terminal Operations.
[FR Doc. 06-7458 Filed 9-5-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
117 STAT. 1326 PUBLIC LAW 108–112—NOV. 11, 2003

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2075:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 149 (2003):

Sept. 30, considered and passed House.

Oct. 29, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 108–112

108th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1905 West

Blue Heron Boulevard in West Palm Beach, Florida, as the ‘‘Judge Edward

Rodgers Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

1905 West Blue Heron Boulevard in West Palm Beach, Florida,

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Judge Edward Rodgers

Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Judge

Edward Rodgers Post Office Building’’.

Approved November 11, 2003.

Nov. 11, 2003

[H.R. 2075]
[No. 1914.]

#### John Roe *v.*The State.

1. Practice — Plea.— Unless the record shows affirmatively that a defendant on trial for a criminal offense pleaded to the indictment or information upon which the prosecution is predicated, or that the plea of not guilty was entered for him by the court, a judgment of conviction will be set aside.

3. Same. — The fact that the case, being a misdemeanor, was tried by the court without the intervention of a jury does not obviate the necessity of a plea by the defendant, or excuse the failure of the court, if he declines to plead, to enter the plea of not guilty for him.

3. Same—Practice in the Court of Appeals — Presumption.— This court cannot presume, against the silence of the record on appeal, that the plea of not guilty was entered by or for the defendant, in response to the indictment. That fact must affirmatively appear by the record.

Appeal from the County Court of Bowie. Tried below before the Hon. J. J. Bell, County Judge.

*90The conviction in this case was for the theft of a hog, cf the value of $12, the property of E. H. Moores, in Bowie county, Texas, on the 10th day of June, 1882. The punishment assessed against the appellant was confinement in the county jail for the term of thirty days.

*J. M.*Talbot, for the appellant.

*J. JEL.*Burts, Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

Hubt, Judge.

This is a conviction for the theft of a hog of the value of $12, the property of E. IT. Moores. The case was tried by the county judge without a jury.

In this case the record fails to show that the defendant pleaded to the information, or that the plea of not guilty was entered for him. This is fatal error for'which the judgment must be reversed.

It is insisted by our assistant attorney-general that, as the case was tried by the judge without a jury, a plea by or for the defendant • was not necessary. This proposition is settled against him in *Melton*v. *The State,*8 Texas Ct. App., 619.

Again, it may be urged that this court should presume that the plea of not guilty was made by or for the defendant, and that this presumption should not be discarded simply because the record is silent in reference thereto; or, in other words, that it is not necessary for the record to show affirmatively that defendant did plead to the indictment or information. In support of the proposition that the record on appeal must show that a plea to the indictment or information was made by, or entered for, the accused, we submit the following authorities: *Sperry*v. *The Commonwealth,*9 Leigh, 623; *Anderson*v. *The State,*3 Finney’s Rep. (Wis.), 367.

Because the record fails to show that a plea was made by or entered for defendant, the judgment is reversed and the case remanded.

*Reversed and remanded.*

[Opinion delivered October 24, 1885.]
#### § 80.72 Antenna requirements for coast stations.

All emissions of a coast station a marine-utility station operated on shore using telephony within the frequency band 30-200 MHz must be vertically polarized.
§ 218.76 Letters of Authorization. ( a ) To incidentally take marine mammals pursuant to the regulations in this subpart, the Navy must apply for and obtain LOAs in accordance with § 216.106 of this chapter.
( b ) LOAs, unless suspended or revoked, may be effective for a period of time not to exceed December 20, 2025.
( c ) If an LOA expires prior to December 20, 2025, the Navy may apply for and obtain a renewal of the LOA.
( d ) In the event of projected changes to the activity or to mitigation, monitoring, or reporting (excluding changes made pursuant to the adaptive management provision of § 218.77(c)(1)) required by an LOA issued under this subpart, the Navy must apply for and obtain a modification of the LOA as described in § 218.77.
( e ) Each LOA must set forth: ( 1 ) Permissible methods of incidental taking;
( 2 ) Geographic areas for incidental taking;
( 3 ) Means of effecting the least practicable adverse impact (*i.e.,* mitigation) on the species or stocks of marine mammals and their habitat; and
( 4 ) Requirements for monitoring and reporting.
( f ) Issuance of the LOA(s) must be based on a determination that the level of taking is consistent with the findings made for the total taking allowable under the regulations in this subpart.
( g ) Notice of issuance or denial of the LOA(s) must be published in the Federal Register within 30 days of a determination.
Supreme Court of the United States

Office of the Clerk

Washington, DC 20543-0001

June 22, 2015

Clerk

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

P.O. Box 12308

Capitol Station

Austin, TX 78711

Re: Eric DeWayne Cathey

v. Texas

No. 14-8305

(Your No. WR-55,161-02)

Scott S. Harris

Clerk of the Court

(202)479-3011

Dear Clerk:

The Court today entered the following order in the above-entitled case:

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

Sincerely,

4-3fr

Scott S. Harris, Clerk

RECEIVED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

JUN 25 2015

Abe! Acosta, Clerk
#### § 95.3361 Certification.

Radar equipment operating in the 76-81 GHz band shall be certificated in accordance with this subpart and subpart J of part 2 of this chapter.
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0912Roadmap to Implementing an Effective Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) ProgramState, local, tribal, and territorial law enforcement agencies, as well as members of the community, have been increasing their use of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS)—also known as drones—because of their increasing utility and efficiency. In early 2020, the COPS Office launched a working group comprising leaders in the field, both local and federal, to identify and create vital resources for law enforcement agencies using and confronting the use of drones. This publication is a roadmap on how agencies can plan, establish, and implement drone programs.By Lisa MantelCategories: TechnologyLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0912Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Dec 2020Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 02:01 (UTC-5) in 0.27 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
§ 90.553 Encryption. ( a ) Encryption is permitted on all but the two nationwide Interoperability calling channels. Radios employing encryption must have a readily accessible switch or other readily accessible control that permits the radio user to disable encryption.
( b ) If encryption is employed, then transmitters manufactured after August 11, 2014 must use the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) specified in ANSI/TIA-102.AAAD-A. Until 2030, manufacturers may also include the Digital Encryption Standard (DES) or Triple Data Encryption Algorithm (TDEA), in addition to but not in place of AES, for compatibility with legacy radios that lack AES capability.
( c ) *ANSI/TIA-102.AAAD-A:* Project 25 Digital Land Mobile Radio-Block Encryption Protocol, approved August 20, 2009 is incorporated by reference into this section with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. This incorporation by reference (IBR) material is available for inspection at the FCC and at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). Contact the FCC through the Federal Communications Commission's Reference Information Center, phone: (202) 418-0270. For information on the availability of this material at NARA, visit *www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html* or email *fr.inspection@nara.gov .* The material may be obtained from the following sources: ( 1 ) Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA), 2500 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22201; website: *https://tiaonline.org .*
( 2 ) S&P Global Standards Store, 15 Inverness Way East, Englewood, CO 80112; website: *https://global.ihs.com .*
( 3 ) American National Standards Institute (ANSI), 25 West 43rd Street, Fourth Floor, New York, NY 10036; website: *www.ansi.org .*
[66 FR 10636, Feb. 16, 2001, as amended at 67 FR 61006, Sept. 26, 2002; 79 FR 39341, July 10, 2014; 85 FR 64410, Oct. 13, 2020; 88 FR 21450, Apr. 10, 2023]
Exhibit
10.1


 


ADDENDUM TO


SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT


 


THIS ADDENDUM TO
SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Addendum”) is made as of the 27th day of July, 2020
by and between UNIVERSAL SECURITY INSTRUMENTS, INC., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”) and HARVEY
B. GROSSBLATT (the “Executive”).


 


INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT


 


The Company and Executive
entered into a Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of July 18, 2005, as amended (the “Original Agreement”).
The parties desire to extend the term of the Original Agreement for an additional one-year term and amend certain provisions of
the “Bonus Formula” set forth therein.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, for
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:


 


		A.	All capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this
Addendum shall have the meanings set forth in the Original Agreement.



 


		B.	The first sentence of Section 1(b) of the Original
Agreement is hereby amended in it entirety to read as follows:



 


Subject
to Section 7, the Company shall employ the Executive pursuant to the terms hereof for the period commencing as of the date hereof
and ending on July 31, 2021.


 


		C.	In all other respects, the Original Agreement, as amended
hereby, shall remain in full force and effect.



 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties have executed this Addendum as of the day and year first above written.


 


 


	 	UNIVERSAL SECURITY INSTRUMENTS, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
	 	 	James B. Huff, Vice President
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/
	 	Harvey B. Grossblatt
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Texas, Carlos Bay to RedfishBay including Copano Bay [electronic resource]**
 
SuDoc Number:C 55.418/7:11314/

Item Number:0191-B-13 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000881131
 
1975-1977 | 1978-1982
 
May 1, 2020
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF


CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of I/OMagic Corporation (the
“Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”), the undersigned
hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his
knowledge:




1. the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2. the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  May
      6, 2010
            By:
            /s/ TONY
      SHAHBAZTony
      Shahbaz
              Chief Executive Officer (principal executive
officer)
              and
      Acting Chief Financial Officer (principalfinancial
      officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER WITHDRAWING MEDIATION ORDER

Court of Appeals Number: 01-20-00235-CV

Style: Charles Blair v. Henry D. Williams

Trial Court Case Number: 2015-51081

Trial Court: 11th District Court of Harris County

Type of Motion: Objection to Mediation

Party Filing Motion: Appellee

Appellee has objected to mediation. The Court’s mediation order dated March 23, 

2020 is withdrawn.

Judge's signature: /s/ Gordon Goodman 

 Acting individually 

Date: April 3, 2020

* Absent emergency or a statement that the motion is unopposed, must wait ten days before acting on motion except for 

motion to extend time to file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a).

Note: Single justice may grant or deny any request for relief properly sought by motion, except in a civil case a single justice 

should not: (1) act on a petition for an extraordinary writ or (2) dismiss or otherwise determine an appeal or a motion 

for rehearing. TEX. R. APP. P. 10.4(a).
#### § 15.53 Countries of export included in the prohibited list. [Reserved]
<PAGE>

Exhibit 12. 1

                        MOHEGAN TRIBAL GAMING AUTHORITY
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                         Fiscal Year Ended September 30,
                                   -------------------------------------------
                                     2001     2000     1999     1998   1997(1)
                                   -------- -------- -------- -------- -------
                                   (Dollars in thousands except per diem data)
<S>                                <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>
Earnings:
   Income from operations......... $190,067 $204,304 $156,546 $135,687 $82,675
                                   ======== ======== ======== ======== =======
Fixed Charges:
   Interest Expense............... $ 25,060 $ 37,799 $ 55,595 $ 50,172 $45,095
   Capitalized Interest...........   27,408    9,880      534       --      --
                                   -------- -------- -------- -------- -------
Total Fixed Charges............... $ 52,468 $ 47,679 $ 56,129 $ 50,172 $45,095
                                   ======== ======== ======== ======== =======
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges     3.6x     4.3x     2.8x     2.7x    1.8x
                                   ======== ======== ======== ======== =======
</TABLE>
--------
(1) The Authority commenced operations at Mohegan Sun on October 12, 1996.
§ 95.2731 Permissible MURS uses. The operator of a MURS station may use it for the purposes listed in this section. ( a ) MURS stations may be used to transmit voice, data or image signals.
( b ) MURS stations may be used for telecommand and telemetry functions.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary 

          - [Transmittal No. 06-46]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency. 

# ACTION:

 Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms  sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/ADM, (703) 604-6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 06-46 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

C.R. Choate,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 54624)          ( print page 54625)          ( print page 54626)          ( print page 54627)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[FR Doc. 06-7723 Filed 8-16-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
#### § 90.460 Scope.

This subpart sets forth the provisions relating to permissible methods of transmitter control and interconnection (see the definition in § 90.7) of radio systems authorized under this part.

[44 FR 67124, Nov. 23, 1979, as amended at 62 FR 18934, Apr. 17, 1997]
#### §§ 217.298-217.299 [Reserved]