alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
J

Provision Effective 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 201

1. Indirect tax effects of reductions in employer costs

for prescription drug insurance and Medicaresubsidies to employers [1] [2] ............................................... [3] 2 4 1,580 2,301 2,648 2,903 3,264 3,56

2. Tax exclusion for certain subsidies to employers [2] [4] ...... tyba DOE --- --- -1,130 -1,644 -1,889 -2,070 -2,322 -2,543. Health Savings Accounts ..................................................... tyba 12/31/03 -160 -474 -533 -597 -650 -704 -754 -804. Exception to form 1099 information reporting 

requirements for certain health arrangements ..................... pma 12/31/02 -23 -24 -24 -25 -26 -27 -27 -2

 NET TOTAL ......................................................................................................... -181 -494 -107 35 83 102 161 20

Joint Committee on Taxation -------------------------------------- NOTE: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. Legend for "Effective" column: 

DOE = date of enactment tyba = taxable years beginning after pma = payments made after

[1] The estimate includes the indirect revenue effect that would exist if the Medicare subsidies to employers were taxable but the employers responded to the subsidies a

[2] Estimate provided by the Congressional Budget Office. Estimate is subject to change based on review of final legislative language. [3] The indirect tax effects that begin in fiscal year 2004 are attributable to provisions in Title XI (enhancing generic competition, drug importation) which are effective upo

The provisions of Title I that affect employers (Part D program and related subsidies) are effective January 1, 2006. 

[4] Although the tax exclusion will be effective for taxable years beginning after the date of enactment, the exclusion will have no effect until January 1, 2006, when the M

employers will begin to be paid. 

ESTIMATED REVENUE EFFECTS OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN THE CONFERENCE AGREEMENT FOR H.R.

[Millions of Dollars] 

Fiscal Years 2004 - 2013 

THE "MEDICARE PRESCRIPTION DRUG, IMPROVEMENT, AND MODERNIZATION ACT OF 2003"
§ 80.559 Licensing limitations. Operational fixed stations are subject to the following licensing limitations: ( a ) A maximum of four frequencies will be assigned.
( b ) Stations will not be authorized when applications indicate less than 16 km (10 miles) separation between a proposed station and a TV transmitter operating on either Channel 4 or 5, or from the post office of a community in which either channel is assigned but not in operation.
( c ) Stations located between 16 km (10 miles) and 128 km (80 miles) of a TV transmitter operating on either Channel 4 or 5, or from the post office of a community in which either channel is assigned but not in operation, are secondary to TV operations within the Grade B service contour.[1]
[51 FR 31213, Sept. 2, 1986; 51 FR 34984, Oct. 1, 1986, as amended at 54 FR 40059, Sept. 29, 1989] Footnotes -
80.559
[1] OET Bulletin No. 67, March 1988, entitled “Potential Interference from Operational Fixed Stations in the 72-76 MHz Band to Television Channels 4 and 5” describes an analytical model that can be used to calculate the potential interference that might result from a given fixed station operation. Copies of the bulletin may be obtained from the Commission's current duplication contractor. Information concerning the current duplication contractor may be obtained from the Office of Public Affairs, Consumer Assistance and Small Business Division, Telephone (202) 632-7000.
USDANEWSVOLUME 57 NO. 7 - SEPTEMBER 1998
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of I/OMagic
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report"),
the undersigned hereby certify in their capacities as Chief Executive Officer
and Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:   August 18, 2006                By:      /s/ Tony Shahbaz
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Tony Shahbaz,
                                                 Chief Executive Officer



Dated:   August 18, 2006                By:      /s/ Tony Shahbaz
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Tony Shahbaz,
                                                 Interim Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of these written statements required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures
that appear typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Description of Compensatory Arrangement with Mr. Marcus G. Smith



 Exhibit 10.23 
 DESCRIPTION OF COMPENSATORY ARRANGEMENT WITH MR. MARCUS G. SMITH 
 On February 13, 2007, the Compensation Committee revised Mr. Marcus G. Smith’s
compensation arrangement with the Company. Consistent with Company policy, Mr. Smith does not have an employment contract. Mr. Smith’s compensation for 2007 will include a base salary of $225,000, and sales commissions based on certain national
sponsorship, marketing and advertising sales by Mr. Smith, at the following rates: 
  

				
	 Performance Racing Network Advertising Sales
	  	7.5	%
	 Other Gross Marketing Sales of:
	  		
	 $0 to $10 million
	  	1.0	%
	 $10 million to $15 million
	  	1.5	%
	 $15 million to $20 million
	  	2.0	%
	 $20 million to $28.5 million
	  	2.5	%
	 Above $28.5 million
	  	3.0	%

 The commissions outlined above are consistent with Mr. Smith’s position and the sales commission program of the
Company. The percentages set forth above are retroactive to $0 if specified sales targets are met. It is anticipated that in future years, Mr. Smith’s annual compensation will continue to be determined by the Company’s Compensation
Committee in accordance with its policies regarding executive officers and any commission bonuses will continue to be consistent with the Company’s overall sales commission and bonus program.
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P019Problem-Solving Tips: A Guide to Reducing Crime and Disorder Through Problem-Solving PartnershipsIntended as a reference for those who are interested in implementing a problem-solving approach, this guide contains information and insights into the process. It takes the reader step by step through solving problems, offers examples of problem-solving from the field, and provide additional resources.Categories: Foundations of Community Policing • Police OperationsLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p019Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Sep 2011Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 02:33 (UTC-5) in 0.19 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
EXHIBIT
32.2: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of China Water Group, Inc.
(the “Company”) certifies that:




1.           The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended March 31,
2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  March
      30, 2009
              /s/ Ding RencaiDing
      Rencai, Chief Financial
Officer
Jump to content

consumer.govwhat to know and do

MenuMenuChange menu visibility

## CG: Main Navigation

                          -  Managing Your Money 
                          -  Credit, Loans and Debt 
                          -  Scams and Identity Theft 
                          -  Toolbox 

Español

# Scams and Identity Theft

Imposter Scams

Avoiding Identity Theft

Recovering from Identity Theft

Scams Against Immigrants

Job Scams

## CG: Footer

                      -  Privacy Policy 
                      -  USA.gov 
                      -  Federal Trade Commission
§ 18.90 Recommended decision, certification of the transcript and submission of comments on the recommended decision. ( a ) Promptly after expiration of the period for receiving written briefs, the presiding officer shall make a recommended decision based on the record and transmit the decision to the Director. The recommended decision shall include: ( 1 ) A statement containing a description of the history of the proceedings;
( 2 ) Findings on the issues of fact with the reasons therefor; and
( 3 ) Rulings on issues of law.
( b ) The presiding officer shall also transmit to the Director the transcript of the hearing, the original and all copies of the direct testimony, and written comments. The presiding officer shall attach to the original transcript of the hearing a certificate stating that to the best of his knowledge and belief the transcript is a true transcript of the testimony given at the hearing except in such particulars as are specified.
( c ) Upon receipt of the recommended decision, the Director shall send a copy thereof to each party by certified mail and shall publish in the Federal Register a notice of the receipt of the recommended decision by the Director. The notice shall include: ( 1 ) A summary of the recommended decision;
( 2 ) A statement that any interested person may file written comments on the recommended decision with the Director by a specified date;
( 3 ) The time(s) and place(s) where the record of the hearing transmitted to the Director pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section may be inspected by interested persons; and
( 4 ) The time(s) and place(s) where the recommended decision may be inspected and/or copied by interested persons.
( d ) Within thirty days after the notice of receipt of the recommended decision has been published in the Federal Register, any interested person may file with the Director any written comments on the recommended decision. All comments, including recommendations from or consultation with the Marine Mammal Commission, must be submitted during the thirty-day period to the Director at the above address.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 60076 Summary Calendar

LAL BHATIA

,

Petitioner

- Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, an entity; JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; SARAH R. SALDANA, Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement; DAVID RIVERA, Field Office Director for the New Orleans Field Office of Immigration and Customs Enforcement; DAVE BERKEBILE, Warden for Adams County Correctional Center

,
Respondent s

- Appellee s

Appeal from the United States Di strict Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 5:15

- CV

- 100

Before KING, DENNIS, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *
Lal Bhatia, formerly federal prisoner # 97562

- 011, appeals the denial of
his motion for a preliminary injunction in a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 proceeding. He
also moves for expedited consideration.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 29, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-60076 Document: 00513775762 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/29/2016No. 16

- 60076

2 During the pendency of this appeal, Bhatia was released from prison and
placed in Immigration and Customs Enforcem ent custody

. Accordingly, his
appeal is moot, and we lack jurisdiction over it

. See Bailey v. Southerland , 821 F.2d 277, 278 (5th Cir. 1987 )

. APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION DENIED. Case: 16-60076 Document: 00513775762 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/29/2016
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

MICHAEL HUERTA, 

ADMINISTRATOR, 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, 

Complainant, 

v. 

SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC. 

Respondent. 

) 

) 

) 

) DMS No. FAA-2014-0809 

) DMS No. FAA-2014-0810 

) DMS No. FAA-2014-0811 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) Judge: Douglas M. Rawald 

) 

) 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

The Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, hereby designates 

the following Agency Attorney as a representative in the captioned cases: 

Jeffrey Harper, Attorney 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

·Enforcement Division- Western Team 

1601 Lind Ave., S.W. 

Renton, W A 98056 

Phone (425) 227-2161 

Facsimile (425) 227-1007 

Email: Jeffrey.harper@faa.gov 

Respectfully submitted, 

Peter J. Lynch ' 

Assistant Chief Counsel for Enforcement 

By: 

Dated: 

' ' - ! ' -- ' . 

/ .. /;? ,~( /M 

I ./'' _._7~,-c-;~ ,!iffrey Harper 

Attorney 

MAR 3 0 2016 

,.-' 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I certifY that the foregoing Notice of Appearance, in DMS Docket Nos., FAA2014-0809, -2014-0810, and -2014-0811, has been sent by facsimile and First Class Mail 

to: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building, Suite 2W1 000 

800 Intlependence Ave., S,W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Fax 202-267-1293 

Honorable Douglas M. Rawald 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Bldg., Ground Floor, Room E11-310 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Fax: 202-366-7536 

Todd Emerson, Esq. 

Sky West Airlines, Inc. 

444 South River Road 

St. George, UT 84 790 

Fax 435-634-3505 

Dated: MAR 3 0 2016 

erg 

Legal Technician 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Enforcement Division- Western Team 

Renton, WA 

2
§ 73.751 Operating power. No international broadcast station shall be authorized to install, or be licensed for operation of, transmitter equipment with: ( a ) A rated carrier power of less than 50 kilowatts (kW) if double-sideband (DSB) modulation is used,
( b ) A peak envelope power of less than 50 kW if single-sideband (SSB) modulation is used, or
( c ) A mean power of less than 10 kW if digital modulation is used.
[70 FR 46676, Aug. 10, 2005]
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to the requirements set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350), the undersigned, in his capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of Del Monte Foods Company, hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. |  | The annual report of Del Monte Foods Company on Form 10-K for the period ended May 1, 2005, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Periodic
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Del Monte Foods Company at the end
of and for the period covered by the Periodic Report.
| | -- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:    July 8, 2005



/S/    RICHARD G.
WOLFORDRichard G. Wolford Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer; Director




This certification
accompanies and is being furnished with this Periodic Report, shall not be deemed filed by Del Monte Foods Company (the Company) for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or
otherwise subject to liability under that Section and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made
before or after the date of this Periodic Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Del Monte Foods Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 226.208 Critical habitat for green turtle. ( a ) Culebra Island, Puerto Rico—Waters surrounding the island of Culebra from the mean high water line seaward to 3 nautical miles (5.6 km). These waters include Culebra's outlying Keys including Cayo Norte, Cayo Ballena, Cayos Geniquí, Isla Culebrita, Arrecife Culebrita, Cayo de Luis Peña, Las Hermanas, El Mono, Cayo Lobo, Cayo Lobito, Cayo Botijuela, Alcarraza, Los Gemelos, and Piedra Steven.
( b ) [Reserved]
[63 FR 46701, Sept. 2, 1998. Redesignated and amended at 64 FR 14067, Mar. 23, 1999]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Parallax Entertainment Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Yarek Bartosz, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 12th day of August, 2003.

| | /s/ Yarek
Yarek Bartosz
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------









---
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5195 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5195

  To require the Federal Trade Commission to issue a trade regulation 
  rule which requires the release of prescriptions for contact lenses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 5, 1994

  Mr. Stark introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Federal Trade Commission to issue a trade regulation 
  rule which requires the release of prescriptions for contact lenses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Contact Lens Prescription Release 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PRESCRIPTIONS FOR CONTACT LENSES.

    (a) In General.--The Federal Trade Commission shall amend its trade 
regulation rule on ophthalmic practice published at 16 C.F.R. 456 to 
require the release of a prescription for contact lenses after the 
contact lens fitting process is completed regardless of whether or not 
the patient requests the prescription.
    (b) Definitions.--For purposes of subsection (a)--
            (1) the term ``prescription'' means the specifications 
        necessary to obtain contact lenses and includes data on the 
        refractive status of patient's eyes,
            (2) the term ``contact lenses fitting process is 
        completed'' means the process which begins after the initial 
        eye examination and includes an examination to determine what 
        the lens specifications should be, the purchase of hard or soft 
        lenses, and an initial evaluation of the fit of the lens on the 
        patient's eyes and follow-up examinations over a period of 
        approximately 6 months and is completed when the lens fitter is 
        satisfied that a successful fit has been achieved.

SEC. 3. EFFECT ON STATE LAW.

    The prescription release requirement of section 2 does not affect 
any State law which permits the release of prescriptions for contact 
lenses on terms which are not more restrictive than the terms of 
section 1 or regulates who is to be legally permitted to fit contact 
lenses.
                                 <all>
```
#### §§ 217.198-217.199 [Reserved]