alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

BK No.:

Chapter:

15-36090

7

Eastern Division

Adv. No.: 16-00502

In Re: )

)

)

)

)

)

Debtor(s)

Stephen D. Richek

)

)

Secure Link, LLC

Plaintiff(s)

Stephen D. Richek, Perry Goldberg, as trustee of trust

created for the benefit of Stephen Richek,

Defendant(s)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Honorable Carol Doyle

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD

TO NOVEMBER 1, 2016, STRIKING SEPTEMBER 14, 2016 STATUS HEARING AND RESETTING STATUS HEARING FOR NOVEMBER 10, 2016.

This matter having come before the Court on Defendant Perry Goldberg's motion for an

extension of time to answer or otherwise plead and the Court being advised in the premises;

 IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Perry Goldberg is given an extension of sixty (60) days to and

including November 1, 2016 to answer or otherwise plead to the complaint.

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the status hearing set for September 14, 2016 is stricken and is reset for November 10, 2016 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 742, 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago,

Illinois.

Enter:

Dated: September 07, 2016 United States Bankruptcy Judge

Honorable Carol A. Doyle

Alexander D. Kerr, Jr.

Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen

33 N. Dearborn St., 7th Fl.

Chicago, IL 60602

312-853-8700 (telephone)

312-782-0040 (facsimile)

akerr@heylroyster.com

Prepared by:

Case 16-00502 Doc 11 Filed 09/07/16 Entered 09/08/16 10:59:01 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
#### § 20.107 Seasons, limits, and shooting hours for tundra swans.

This section provides for the annual hunting of tundra swans in designated portions of the 48 contiguous United States.

[55 FR 39829, Sept. 28, 1990]

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations affecting annual regulatory schedules for this section, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*
No. 11-5475.

#### Johnston *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 90.1023 Records maintenance and definitions. ( a ) *Records maintenance.* All winning bidders qualifying as small or very small businesses shall maintain at their principal place of business an updated file of ownership, revenue, and asset information, including any documents necessary to establish eligibility as a small business or very small business, as defined in § 90.1021, and/or consortium of small businesses (or consortium of very small businesses). Licensees (and their successors-in-interest) shall maintain such files for the term of the license. Applicants that do not obtain the license(s) for which they applied shall maintain such files until the grant of such license(s) is final, or one year from the date of the filing of their short-form application (FCC Form 175), whichever is earlier.
( b ) *Definitions.* The terms small and very small business used in this section are defined in § 90.1021.
[68 FR 43001, July 21, 2003]
#### § 95.301 Scope.

This subpart contains rules that apply generally to all of the Personal Radio Services.
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
 
 SECTION
        906 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
        OFFICER
        OF VOCALSCAPE NETWORKS, INC.
 
 In
        connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Vocalscape
        Networks, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, the undersigned, Ron
        McIntyre, President and principal financial officer of Vocalscape Networks,
        Inc., does hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
        pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
        such
        Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 fully
        complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2)
        the
        information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
        ended March 31, 2006 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
        condition and results of operations of Vocalscape Networks, Inc.


Date: May 22, 2006
            /s/ Ron McIntyre
              Ron
                McIntyre
              President
                and principal financial officer
Thanks Jeff,we have no comments

From: Jeff Hunt [mailto:Hunt.Jeff@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 8:55 AM 

To: Mary Basballe; Bill Sullivan 

Cc: Debra Suzuki; Nancy Helm 

Subject: Fw: No comments on the Tacoma CDD

 

Hello Bill and Mary -- I just wanted to send this message as an FYI. We receive no comments on the proposed 

Clean Data Determination for the Tacoma, Pierce County nonattainment area that we discussed in May, so I plan 

to complete the final determination sometime this month. As always, if you have any questions please feel free to 

call me. Thanks .......... jh

(See attached file: OFR version_NPR_Tacoma_2006 PM2.5 CDD.pdf)

Jeff Hunt 

Office of Air, Waste and Toxics 

EPA Region 10, Mailstop AWT-107 

1200 Sixth Ave, Suite 900 

Seattle, WA 98101 

(206) 553-0256

RE: No comments on the Tacoma CDD 

Bill Sullivan 

to: 

Jeff Hunt 

08/07/2012 09:03 AM 

Hide Details 

From: Bill Sullivan <bill.sullivan@puyalluptribe.com>

To: Jeff Hunt/R10/USEPA/US@EPA 

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\JHUNT02\Local Settings\Temp\notesDF63F8\~web6273... 8/10/2012
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Lawrence H. Hayward, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Leslies Poolmart, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 29, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Leslies Poolmart, Inc.

Dated: December 17, 2007



By:

/s/ Lawrence H. HaywardName:

Lawrence H. HaywardTitle:

Chief Executive Officer


I, Steven L. Ortega, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Leslies Poolmart, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 29, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Leslies Poolmart, Inc.

Dated: December 17, 2007



By:

/s/ Steven L. OrtegaName:

Steven L. OrtegaTitle:

Executive Vice-President andChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OIL AND GAS SEEKERS, INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Gary Ruff, Chief Executive Officer, and Harold Kaufman, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 14th day of August, 2002.

| | /s/ Gary Ruff
Gary Ruff
President, Chief Executive Officer           
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Harold Kaufman 
Harold Kaufman
Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of the Company

The
following is a list of subsidiaries of the Company as of December 31, 2013:



|                                                 |  |                                          
|------------------------------------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------
|Name                                             |  | State or Sovereign Power of Incorporation
|Lighting Science Group B.V.                      |  | The Netherlands                          
|Lighting Science Coöperatief U.A.                |  | The Netherlands                          
|Lighting Science Group Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V. |  | Mexico                                   
|LSGC Pty. Ltd.                                   |  | Australia                                
|LSGC LLC                                         |  | Delaware                                 
|Biological Illumination, LLC                     |  | Delaware                                 
|Lighting Science Macau Limited                   |  | Macau                                    
|Lighting Science India Private Limited           |  | India
#### McNEILL et al. v. NEVIUS et al.

No. 10680.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued Nov. 17, 1950.

Decided Dec. 7, 1950.

Messrs. Wesley E. McDonald and Carl G. Engling, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Thomas Bruce Fuller, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellants.

Mr. Howard Boyd, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Paul R. Connolly and William B. Harvey, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellees..

Before CLARK, FAHY and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.

CLARK, Circuit Judge.

The appellants brought suit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia to recover commissions allegedly due under a contract made in contemplation of the sale of certain real estate to the Government. This contract between the owners of the property, appellees, and the appellants called for the latter (according to their own version) to represent the owners before various committees of Congress, agencies, departments, and commissions of the United States Government. It further provided as compensation for the appellants a two per cent commission of the purchase price; the compensation was made contingent on appellants’ successfully making the sale.

The lower court directed a verdict for the appellees on the pleadings and the opening statement at the conclusion of the appellants’ opening statement. The authority of a Federal Court to do so is supported by the cases. McGovern v. Hitt, 1933, 62 App.D.C. 33, 64 F.2d 156, certiorari denied, 1933, 290 U.S. 637, 54 S.Ct. 54, 78 L.Ed. 554.

The directed verdict was made on the ground that this contingent fee contract to negotiate the sale of property to the United States is contrary to public policy and void. We have so held. Noonan v. Gilbert, 1934, 63 App.D.C. 30, 68 F.2d 775; Silverman v. Osborne Register Co., 1946, 81 U.S.App.D.C. 163, 155 F.2d 879, and cases therein cited.

Affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

ORDER AMENDING RULES 170

AND 172 OF THE 

PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF 

JUVENILE COURT PROCEDURE

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

NO. 793

SUPREME COURT RULES

DOCKET 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 1

st day of March, 2019, upon the recommendation of the 

Juvenile Court Procedural Rules Committee, the proposal having been published for 

public comment at 47 Pa.B. 938 (February 18, 2017): 

It is Ordered pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania 

that Pennsylvania Rules of Juvenile Court Procedure 170 and 172 are amended in the 

attached form.

This Order shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and shall 

be effective on July 1, 2019.

Additions to the rule are shown in bold and are underlined.

Deletions from the rule are shown in bold and brackets.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 183 (Thursday, September 21, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55276-55277]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7851]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (including the 
States of IA, KS, MN, MO, NE, OK, and TX)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service, (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 55277]]

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, 
ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, October 10, 2006, at 9:30 a.m. 
Central Time.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Ann Delzer at 1-888-912-1227, or 
(414) 231-2360.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Tuesday, October 10, 2006, at 9:30 a.m. Central Time via a telephone 
conference call. You can submit written comments to the panel by faxing 
to (414) 231-2363, or by mail to Taxpayer Advocacy Panel, Stop1006MIL, 
PO Box 3205, Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221, or you can contact us at http://www.improveirs.org. This meeting is not required to be open to the 
public, but because we are always interested in community input, we 
will accept public comments. Please contact Mary Ann Delzer at 1-888-
912-1227 or (414) 231-2360 for additional information.

    The agenda will include the following: Various IRS issues.

    Dated: September 12, 2006.
John Fay,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 06-7851 Filed 9-20-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          358,540
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,100
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,860,640)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               (1,858,540)
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               317,886
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,817,643)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,860,640)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (.886)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.886)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.1


Section
1350 Certification





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of SUNRISE REAL ESTATE GROUP, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10−Q for the three and six months ended June 30,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes−Oxley Act of 2002
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request and for the
periods indicated.





Date:
      August 19, 2010
                    By:
                    /s/
      Lin, Chi-JungLin,
      Chi-Jung, Chief Executive OfficerDate:
      August 19, 2010
                    By:
                    /s/
      Wang Wen-YanWang
      Wen-Yan, Chief Financial
Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 24.1


                     DIRECTORS, OFFICERS AND REPRESENTATIVES
                           OF GRANT GEOPHYSICAL, INC.
                              AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

          SECURITIES FILINGS UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

                  Each of the undersigned officers, directors and
representatives of Grant Geophysical, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Corporation"), hereby constitutes and appoints Jonathan D. Pollock, Larry E.
Lenig, Jr. and Michael P. Keirnan and each of them, with full power of
substitution and resubstitution, as attorneys-in-fact or attorney-in-fact of the
undersigned, for him and in his name, place and stead, to sign and file with the
Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 an
Annual Report on Form 10-K, with full power and authority to do and perform any
and all acts and things whatsoever that any of said attorneys or their
substitutes may deem necessary or desirable, in his or their sole discretion,
with any such act or thing being hereby ratified and approved in all respects
without any further act or deed whatsoever.

                  EXECUTED as of March 30, 1998.





/s/ Charles Ackerman                             /s/ Larry E. Lenig, Jr.
---------------------------                      -------------------------------
Charles Ackerman                                 Larry E. Lenig, Jr.


/s/ W. Richard Anderson
---------------------------                      -------------------------------
W. Richard Anderson                              Jonathan D. Pollock


/s/ James R. Brock                               /s/ Donald G. Russell
---------------------------                      -------------------------------
James R. Brock                                   Donald G. Russell


/s/ J. Kelly Elliott                             /s/ Donald W. Wilson
---------------------------                      -------------------------------
J. Kelly Elliott                                 Donald W. Wilson


/s/ Michael P. Keirnan
---------------------------
Michael P. Keirnan
Fourth Amendment to the 2000 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan




 Exhibit 10.27 
 AMENDMENT NO. 4 
 TO 
 2000 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS’ STOCK OPTION PLAN 
 THIS AMENDMENT NO. 4 by
Tanox, Inc. (the “Company”), 
 WITNESSETH: 
 WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Tanox, Inc. 2000 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan, as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto dated May 16, 2001, Amendment No. 2 thereto dated
February 13, 2004, and Amendment No. 3 thereto dated January 27, 2006 (the “Plan”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Company
retained the right in Section 12 of the Plan for the Board of Directors of the Company to amend the Plan from time to time; and 
 WHEREAS, on April 28, 2006, the Board of Directors approved further amending the Plan as set forth below; 
 NOW, THEREFORE,
the Company agrees that, effective April 17, 2006 (the “Amendment 4 Effective Date”), the Plan is amended as follows, subject in all respects to the approval hereof by the stockholders of the Company at the annual meeting of
stockholders to be held in 2006: 
  

	 	1.	Section 1(h) of the Plan is hereby amended to read as follows in its entirety: 

 “(h) “Consultant” means any person, including an advisor, engaged by the Company or an Affiliate to render consulting or advisory services and who is compensated for these services. The term
“Consultant” shall not include Directors who are merely paid a director’s fee by the Company for their services as Directors. 
  

	 	2.	Section 1(q) of the Plan is hereby amended to read as follows in its entirety: 

 “(q) “Non-Employee Director” means a Director who is not an Employee or Consultant.” 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this Amendment this 28th day of April, 2006. 
  

			
	 TANOX, INC.

		
	 By:
	 	 Gregory Guidroz

	 Name:
	 	 Gregory Guidroz

	 Title:
	 	 Vice President—Finance
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-50111

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE SANDOVAL-MANZO,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-00-CR-1731-ALL-DB

- - - - - - - - - -

June 15, 2001

Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Sandoval-Manzo appeals his sentence following his

guilty plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation in

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Sandoval argues that his sentence

should not have exceeded the two-year maximum sentence under 8

U.S.C. § 1326(a). Sandoval acknowledges that his argument is

foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224

(1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court

review in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). 
No. 01-50111

- 2 -

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). 

Sandoval’s argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres, 523 U.S.

at 235. 

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an

appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is granted.

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
§ 221.50 When and where will the hearing be held? ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the hearing will be held at the time and place set at the initial prehearing conference under § 221.40, generally within 25 days after the date set for completion of discovery.
( b ) On motion by a party or on the ALJ's initiative, the ALJ may change the date, time, or place of the hearing if he or she finds: ( 1 ) That there is good cause for the change; and
( 2 ) That the change will not unduly prejudice the parties and witnesses.