alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                           AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT
                                           
                                           
                                           
    This Amendment to Employment Contract ("Amendment") effective January 1,
1996,  by and between Midland Resources, Inc., a Texas corporation, referred to
in this Amendment as "Employer", located at 16701 Greenspoint Park Drive, Suite
200, Houston, Texas 77060 and Deas H. Warley III referred to in this Agreement
as "Employee".

                                     WITNESSETH:

    WHEREAS, the Employer and the Employee desire to amend the terms of the
Employment Contract (the "Agreement") between them effective January 1, 1995;

    NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants
hereinafter set forth, the parties agree to amend the Agreement as follows: 

1.  TERM OF EMPLOYMENT.  The term of the Agreement, as set forth in paragraph
1.1 thereof is hereby extended through December 31, 2000. On the anniversary of
the effective date of this Amendment, the term of the Agreement shall be
automatically extended for an  additional period of one (1) year, provided that
(i) the Employee is employed by the Employer on such anniversary and (ii)
neither party has, within three (3) months prior to such anniversary given the
other party written notice that the Agreement shall not be automatically
extended thereafter.

2.  RATIFICATION.  Except as herein amended, the provisions of the Agreement
remain in full force and effect and are hereby ratified and confirmed.

EXECUTED at Houston, Texas this 8th of January, 1996.

              EMPLOYER

                                   By: /s/  Deas H. Warley III     
                                       ----------------------------------
                                       Deas H. Warley III - President

                                   By: /s/  Sam R. Brock               
                                       ----------------------------------
                                       Sam R. Brock, Director
                                       Compensation Committee Member

                                   By: /s/   Robert R. Donnelly     
                                       ----------------------------------
                                       Robert R. Donnelly, Director
                                       Compensation Committee Member

              EMPLOYEE
                        
                                        /s/    D.H. Warley III            
                                       ----------------------------------
                                        Deas H. Warley III
§ 90.250 Meteor burst communications. Meteor burst communications may be authorized for the use of private radio stations subject to the following provisions: ( a ) Station operation is limited to the State of Alaska only.
( b ) The frequency 44.20 MHz may be used for base station operation and 45.90 MHz for remote station operation on a primary basis. The frequencies 42.40 and 44.10 MHz may be used by base and remote stations, respectively, on a secondary basis to common carrier stations utilizing meteor burst communications. Users shall cooperate among themselves to the extent practicable to promote compatible operation.
( c ) The maximum transmitter output power shall not exceed 2000 watts for base stations and 500 watts for remote stations.
( d ) Co-channel base stations of different licensees shall be located at least 241 km (150 miles) apart. A remote station and a base station of different licensees shall be located at least 241 km (150 miles) apart if the remote units of the different licensees operate on the same frequency. Waiver of this requirement may be granted if affected users agree to a cooperative sharing arrangement.
( e ) The authorized emission designator to be used in F1E, F7W, G1E or G7W to allow for Phase Shift Keying (PSK) or Frequency Shift Keying (FSK).
( f ) The maximum authorized bandwidth is 20 kHz.
( g ) Station identification in accordance with § 90.425(a) or (b) shall only be required for the base station.
( h ) Stations may be required to comply with additional conditions of operation as necessary on a case-by-case basis as specified in the authorization.
( i ) Stations employing meteor burst communications must not cause interference to other stations operating in accordance with the allocation table. New authorizations will be issued subject to the Commission's experimental licensing rules in part 5 of this chapter. Prior to expiration of the experimental authorization, application Form 601 should be filed for issuance of a permanent authorization.
[48 FR 34043, July 27, 1983, as amended at 49 FR 48712, Dec. 14, 1984; 58 FR 44957, Aug. 25, 1993; 72 FR 35196, June 27, 2007; 78 FR 25175, Apr. 29, 2013]
MUSA SHABAZZ

,
Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,
Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 13

- 2046

___________ __________________/

Opinion filed October 3, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Dawn Caloca

- Johnson , Judge

.
Baya Harrison, III, Monticello , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Virginia Harris, Assistant Attorney G eneral, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

THOMAS

, ROBERTS

, and ROWE

, J J

. , CONCUR.
Exhibit 31.1



Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer



I, Ryan Corley, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of EnXnet, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.





Date: November 13, 2007



By: /s/ Ryan Corley

Ryan Corley

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
§ 14.31 Permits to import or export wildlife at nondesignated port for scientific purposes. ( a ) *General.* The Director may, upon receipt of an application submitted in accordance with the provisions of this section and §§ 13.11 and 13.12 of this subchapter, and in accordance with the issuance criteria of this section, issue a permit authorizing importation or exportation of wildlife for scientific purposes at one or more named Customs port(s) of entry not otherwise authorized by subpart B. Such permits may authorize a single importation or exportation, a series of importations or exportations, or importation or exportation during a specified period of time.
( b ) *Application procedure.* Applications for permits to import or export wildlife at a nondesignated port for scientific purposes must be submitted to the Director. Each application must contain the general information and certification required by § 13.12(a) of this subchapter, plus the following additional information: ( 1 ) The scientific purpose or uses of the wildlife to be imported or exported;
( 2 ) The number and kinds of wildlife described by scientific and common names to be imported or exported where such number and kinds can be determined;
( 3 ) The country or place in which the wildlife was removed from the wild (if known), or where born in captivity;
( 4 ) The port(s) of entry where importation or exportation is requested, and the reasons why importation or exportation should be allowed at the requested port(s) of entry rather than at a designated port; and
( 5 ) A statement as to whether the exception is being requested for a single shipment, a series of shipments, or shipments over a specified period of time and the date(s) involved.
( c ) *Additional permit conditions.* In addition to the general conditions set forth in part 13 of this subchapter B, permits to import or export wildlife at a nondesignated port issued under this section are subject to the following condition: Permittee shall file such reports as specified on the permit, if any.
( d ) *Issuance criteria.* The Director shall consider the following in determining whether to issue a permit under this section: ( 1 ) Benefit to a *bona fide* scientific research project, other scientific purpose, or facilitation of the exchange of preserved museum specimens;
( 2 ) The kind of wildlife involved and its place of origin;
( 3 ) The reasons why the exception is requested; and
( 4 ) Availability of a Service officer.
( e ) *Duration of permits.* Any permit issued under this section expires on the date designated on the face of the permit. In no case will the permit be valid for more than 2 years from the date of issuance.
1 ... T h i s pr oce edi n g a r i s es ou t of Cau s e N o. 2010- CR
- 5325, s t y l ed St at e of Texas v. Ch r i s t op her Co ok, in the 2 2 7 th J u d ic ia l D istric t C o u rt, B e x a r C o u n ty, T e x a s , t h e H o n o ra b le P h ili p K a z e n p re sid ing
.

2 ... A t t o rney Jeanne B l o o m st er i s ap p o i nt ed t o represent rel at o r i n t he cri m i nal pro ceed i ng pe nd i ng i n t he tria l co u rt. i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No
. 04 -1 0- 00 46 8- CR IN RE Christopher CO OK Orig inal Mandamus Proce eding 1 PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Phy lis J . Speedlin, J ustice Marialy n Ba rnar d, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: J uly 7, 2010 PETI TI ON F OR WR I T OF MANDAMUS DEN I ED On J une 23, 2010, relator Christopher Cook filed a pe tition for writ of mandamus, see king to c omp e l th e tr ia l c ourt

to r ule on his pr o s e motion for

speedy trial, motions for discovery , motion for r eduction of bond, motion reque sting e x amining tr ial, and motion to suppress evidenc e. Howeve r, counse l has bee n appointed to re prese nt relator in the criminal proc eedingpending in the trial court for which he is curr ently confine d. 2 A cr imi na l def e nd a nt is not e nti tle d to hy br id
r e p r e s e n tation. See R ob ins on v . S tat e , 2 40 S.W. 3d

91 9, 92 2 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 20 07 ); Patrick v.04
- 10
- 00 46 8- CR

- 2- Sta te , 906 S.W .2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). A trial court has no leg al duty to r ule on a pr o
se motion filed with reg ard to a criminal proc eedingin wh i ch the def endant is re prese nted by counsel. See Robinson , 240 S.W .3d at 922. Consequently , the trial court did not abuse its discretion by de c lin ingto r

ule on re la tor ’s pr o s e motions that re late dire ctly to his confinement base d on the criminal proce eding pending in the trial court. Ac cording ly , rela tor’s petition for wr it of mandamus is denied. T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.8(a)
. P E R C U R I A M DO NO T PU B L I SH
Merrimack,

No. 4694.

#### State *v.*George F. Brown.

Argued October 7, 1958.

Decided November 5, 1958.

*434
      *Louis C. Wyman,*Attorney General, *John J. Zimmerman,*Assistant Attorney General, and *Dort S. Bigg,*Law Assistant *(Mr. Bigg*orally), for the State.

*Green, Green, Romprey & Sullivan*and *James A. Manning (Mr. Manning*orally), for the defendant.

Wheeler, J.

RSA 70:6 (supp.) provides that a candidate for Representative in Congress shall file a statement of receipts and expenditures covering the period of his candidacy, not later than the Wednesday preceding the primary before the close of the business day. See RSA 70:5 (supp.). In this case that was September 5, 1956. The statute requires that such statement be filed even though the candidate has had no receipts or expenditures. A filing on September 7, 1956, was not compliance with the statute. *State*v. *Sullivan,*101 N. H. 429.

*Motion denied.*

All concurred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
 THIS SCHEDULE IS NOT APPLICABLE AS THE ANNUAL SUMMARIES ATTACHED AS
 EXHIBIT 13 ARE ANNUALIZED VERSIONS OF THE MONTHLY SERVICER CERTIFICATES
 PREPARED BY THE SERVICER AND ARE NOT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE TRUSTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        



</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

STEVEN TAFT,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 296 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 31st day of January, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.

Justice McCaffery did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
SUMMIT SECURITIES, INC.
                        RATIO OF EARNING TO FIXED CHARGES
                          AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

The ratio of adjusted earnings to fixed charges and Preferred Stock dividends was computed
using  the  following tabulations to compute adjusted earnings and the  defined  fixed
charges and Preferred Stock dividends.

                                                        Year Ended
                                                      September 30,
                               1996          1995          1994          1993                  1992
<S>                      <C>           <C>            <C>            <C>
Income before extraordinary
  item                    $1,244,522    $  587,559     $  264,879    $   283,107        $  611,595
Add:
  Interest                 3,741,095     3,251,334      2,527,945      1,792,059         1,390,968
  Taxes on
   income                    237,951       239,707        140,407        145,951           127,989
                          ----------    ----------    -----------     ----------         ---------
Adjusted Earnings          $5,223,568    $4,078,600     $2,933,231     $2,221,117        $2,130,552
==========            ==========    ==========     ==========      =========
Preferred Stock Dividend
  Requirements              $333,606    $  309,061     $    2,930

Ratio Factor of Income
  after provision for income
  taxes to income before
  provision for income taxes     84%           71%            65%

<PAGE>                        Page 79


Preferred Stock Dividend
  Factor on Pretax Basis     397,387       435,297          4,508

Fixed Charges
  Interest                 3,741,095     3,251,334     $2,527,945     $1,792,059        $1,390,968
                          ----------    ----------     ----------     ----------        ----------
Fixed Charges and Preferred
  Stock Dividends         $4,138,482    $3,686,631     $2,532,453     $1,792,059        $1,390,968
                          ==========    ==========     ==========     ==========        ==========
Ratio of Adjusted Earnings
  to Fixed Charges and
  Preferred Stock Dividends    1.26           1.11           1.16           1.24           1.53
                               ====           ====           ====           ====           ====
</TABLE>
§ 21.171 Control order for purple swamphens. ( a ) *Control of purple swamphens.* Federal, State, Tribal, and local wildlife management agencies, and their tenants, employees, or agents may remove or destroy purple swamphens (*Porphyrio porphyrio*) or their nests or eggs at any time when they find them anywhere in the contiguous United States, Hawaii, Alaska, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or the U.S. Virgin Islands. Any authorized agency personnel may temporarily possess, transport, and dispose of purple swamphens, subject to the restrictions in paragraph (c) of this section. No permit is necessary to engage in these actions.
( b ) *Disposal of purple swamphens.* If you are authorized to control purple swamphens, you may dispose of purple swamphens by the following methods: You may donate purple swamphens taken under this order to public museums or public institutions for scientific or educational purposes; you may dispose of the carcasses by burial or incineration; or, if the carcasses are not readily retrievable, you may leave them in place. No one may retain for personal use, offer for sale, or sell a purple swamphen removed under this section.
( c ) *Other provisions.* ( 1 ) You may not remove or destroy purple swamphens or their nests or eggs if doing so is contrary to any State, territorial, tribal, or local laws or regulations.
( 2 ) You may not remove or destroy purple swamphens or their nests or eggs if doing so will adversely affect other migratory birds or species designated as endangered or threatened under the authority of the Endangered Species Act. In particular, the purple swamphen resembles the native purple gallinule (*Porphyrio martinicus*). Authorized persons must take special care not to take purple gallinules or their nests or eggs when conducting purple swamphen control activities.
( 3 ) If you use firearms to control purple swamphens under this regulation, you may use only nontoxic shot or nontoxic bullets for the control.
( 4 ) If, while operating under this regulation, an authorized person takes any other species protected under the Endangered Species Act, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, or the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, that person must immediately report the take to the nearest Ecological Services office of the Fish and Wildlife Service. *See https://www.fws.gov/offices* to find the location of the nearest Ecological Services office.
( 5 ) We may suspend or revoke the authority of any agency or individual to undertake purple swamphen control if we find that agency or individual has, without an applicable permit, taken actions that may take Federally listed threatened or endangered species or any bird species protected by the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act or the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (*see* § 10.13 of subchapter A of this chapter for the list of protected migratory bird species), or otherwise violated Federal regulations.
[75 FR 9316, Mar. 1, 2010, as amended at 80 FR 15691, Mar. 25, 2015. Redesignated at 87 FR 882, Jan. 7, 2022; 87 FR 883, Jan. 7, 2022]
Order entered January 11, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-01174-CR

No. 05-21-01175-CR

No. 05-21-01176-CR

RONALD AUSTIN ROBERSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F20-12217-M, F20-22292-M & F20-22365-M

ORDER

Appellant filed a timely pro se notice of appeal in these appeals. We

ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine whether appellant is 

indigent and entitled to court-appointed counsel in these appeals. If the trial court 

finds that appellant is entitled to court-appointed counsel, we ORDER the trial 

court to appoint an attorney to represent appellant in the appeals. If the trial court 

finds that appellant is not entitled to court-appointed counsel, the trial court shall 
determine whether appellant will retain counsel to represent him in the appeals

and, if so, the name, State Bar number, and contact information for retained 

counsel.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit any record of the hearing on counsel, 

including findings of fact, any orders, and any supporting documentation, to this 

Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.

We ORDER District Clerk Felicia Pitre to file supplemental clerk’s records

containing the appointment of counsel within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this 

order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Ernest 

White, Presiding Judge, 194th Judicial District Court; to Felicia Pitre, Dallas

County District Clerk; to Belinda Baraka, court reporter, 194th Judicial District 

Court; to Christina O’Neil, Chief Judicial Staff Counsel; and to the Dallas County 

District Attorney’s Office, Appellate Division.

We ABATE the appeals to allow the trial court an opportunity to comply 

with this order. They will be reinstated when the supplemental clerk’s records are 

filed, the Court is notified that appellate counsel has been appointed, or the Court 

deems it appropriate to reinstate.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE