alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

Exhibit 13.2

**SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Polymet Mining Corp.  (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ended January 31, 2004  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,  Terese J. Gieselman Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant  to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                         |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                               |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations        of the Company. |

| Date: July 28, 2004 | /s/ Terese j. Gieselman      Terese J. Gieselman      Chief Financial Officer      (Principal Financial Officer) |
|---------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jupitermedia Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald J. ONeill, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Donald J. ONeill                                                                                
|Donald J. ONeill                                                                                    
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer)
|August 11, 2008
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

In connection with the Annual Report of IEA Income Fund XI (the Registrant)
on Form 10-K for the fiscal period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Dennis J. Tietz, the
President and Chief Executive Officer of Cronos Capital Corp., the General
Partner of the Registrant, certify, based on my knowledge, that:



|     |                                                                                                                                                       
|---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(i)  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and                                 
|     |                                                                                                                                                       
|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operation of the Registrant.



| |               
| | --------------
| | March 25, 2003



| |    |                                                                                                               
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | By | /s/ Dennis J. Tietz                                                                                           
| |    |                                                                                                               
| |    | Dennis J. Tietz,
President and Chief Executive Officer
Cronos Capital Corp.,
General Partner of the Registrant



---

|* |  | This certification, required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, other than as required by Section 906, shall not be deemed to be
filed with the Commission or subject to the rules and regulations
promulgated by the Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of said Act.
|- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4805 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4805

To amend title 23, United States Code, relating to penalties for use of 
                          motorcycle helmets.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 20, 1994

 Mr. Slattery introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Public Works and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 23, United States Code, relating to penalties for use of 
                          motorcycle helmets.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PENALTIES RELATING TO USE OF SAFETY BELTS AND MOTORCYCLE 
              HELMETS.

    (a) Fiscal Year 1994.--Section 153(h)(1) of title 23, United States 
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: ``However if, at 
any time in fiscal year 1994, a State does have in effect a law 
described in subsection (a)(2), the amount of such transfer shall be 
\3/4\ percent of such funds.''.
    (b) Thereafter.--Section 153(h)(2) of such title is amended by 
adding at the end the following: ``However if, at any time in such 
fiscal year, such State does have in effect a law described in 
subsection (a)(2), the amount of such transfer shall be 1\1/2\ percent 
of such funds.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 16.2 Scope of regulations.

The provisions of this part are in addition to, and are not in lieu of, other regulations of this subchapter B which may require a permit or prescribe additional restrictions or conditions for the importation, exportation, and interstate transportation of wildlife (see also part 13).
#### § 27.65 Tampering with vehicles and equipment.

Tampering with, entering, or starting any motor vehicle, boat, equipment or machinery or attempting to tamper with, enter, or start any motor vehicle, boat, equipment or machinery on any national wildlife refuge without proper authorization is prohibited.
**ODP Information Bulletin**
**No. 72   May 12, 2003**TO:All State Administrative Agency HeadsAll State Administrative Agency Points of ContactFROM:Andrew T. MitchellActing DirectorSUBJECT:Additional Guidance for the Recipients of Fiscal Year 2003 State Homeland Security Grant Program (SHSGP) - Part II Grants
On March 21, 2003, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Office of State and LocalCoordination requested that state and territorial Homeland Security Advisors report on steps takento protect critical infrastructure during Operation Liberty Shield.  This request focused on assetsthat fell into two categories: 1) those identified by DHS specifically; and, 2) those identified bythe state based on an additional list of thirteen criteria provided by DHS.  Attached to thisinformation bulletin are the original data request, response form and list of additional criticalinfrastructure criteria.

A special condition requiring the submission of this information is being added to Fiscal Year 2003State Domestic Preparedness Program (SHSGP) - Part II grants.  Please use the form provided to submityour state�s information.  This information should be included with the budget detail worksheets to besubmitted with the SHSGP - II Categorical Assistance Progress Report due after June 30, 2003.  Failureto submit this information will result in withholding of funds.

Should you have any additional questions, please feel free to contact the ODP Helpline at:1-800-368-6498.

Attachments: original data request, response form and list of additional critical infrastructure criteria.
USDA's FY97 Budget Calls for a Gain of $3.8 Billion;
§ 253.26 Traditional loans. ( a ) *Eligible projects.* Financing or refinancing up to 80 percent of a project's actual cost shall be available to any citizen who is determined to be eligible and qualified under the Act and these rules, except— ( 1 ) The Program will not finance the cost of new vessel construction.
( 2 ) The Program will not finance a vessel refurbishing project that materially increases an existing vessel's harvesting capacity.
( b ) *Financing or refinancing.* ( 1 ) Projects, other than those specified in paragraphs (a) (1) and (a)(2) of this section, may be financed, as well as refinanced.
( 2 ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the Program may refinance the construction cost of a vessel whose construction cost has already been financed (or otherwise paid) prior to the submission of a loan application.
( 3 ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a)(2) of this section, the Program may refinance the refurbishing cost of a vessel whose initial refurbishing cost has already been financed (or otherwise paid) prior to the submission of a loan application.
( 4 ) The Program may finance or refinance the purchase or refurbishment of any vessel or facility for which the Secretary has: ( i ) Accelerated and/or paid outstanding debts or obligations;
( ii ) Acquired; or
( iii ) Sold at foreclosure.
( c ) *Existing vessels and facilities.* The Program may finance the purchase of an existing vessel or existing fishery facility if such vessel or facility will be refurbished in the United States and will be used in the fishing industry.
( d ) *Fisheries modernization.* Notwithstanding any of this part, the Program may finance or refinance any: ( 1 ) Activities that assist in the transition to reduced fishing capacity; or
( 2 ) Technologies or upgrades designed to: ( i ) Improve collection and reporting of fishery-dependent data;
( ii ) Reduce bycatch;
( iii ) Improve selectivity;
( iv ) Reduce adverse impacts of fishing gear; or
( v ) Improve safety.
( e ) *Guaranty transition.* Upon application by the obligor, any guaranteed loans originated prior to October 11, 1996, may be refinanced as direct loans, regardless of the original purpose of the guaranteed loan.
( f ) *Maturity.* Maturity may not exceed 25 years, but shall not exceed the project property's useful life. The Program, at its sole discretion, may set a shorter maturity period.
( g ) *Credit standards.* Traditional loans are subject to all Program general credit standards and requirements. Collateral, guarantee and other requirements may be adjusted in accordance with the Program's assessment of individual credit risks.
#### § 18.1 Purpose of regulations.

The regulations contained in this part implement the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1361-1407), which among other things, restricts the taking, possession, transportation, selling, offering for sale, and importing of marine mammals.
Exhibit 32



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Siclone Industries, Inc., on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Paul Adams, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a)
or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date: November 11, 2005         /s/ Paul Adams
                               ------------------------------------------------
                               Paul Adams, Chief Executive Officer
                               And Principal Accounting Officer
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4751

To reauthorize appropriations for the weatherization program under section

422 of the Energy Conservation and Production Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 13, 1994

Mr. SHARP introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To reauthorize appropriations for the weatherization program

under section 422 of the Energy Conservation and Production Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 422 of the Energy Conservation and Produc4 tion Act (42 U.S.C. 6872) is amended to read as follows:

5 ‘‘AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS

6 ‘‘SEC. 422. For the purposes of carrying out the

7 weatherization program under this part, there are author8 ized to be appropriated for fiscal years 1995 through 1999

9 such sums as may be necessary.’’.

Æ
#### § 95.3347 76-81 GHz Band Radar Service automatic control.

Notwithstanding the provisions of § 95.347, 76-81 GHz Band Radar Service operations may be conducted under manual or automatic control.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5242

To amend the Act commonly referred to as the ‘‘Johnson Act’’ to limit

the authority of States to regulate gambling devices on vessels.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 7, 1994

Ms. SCHENK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To amend the Act commonly referred to as the ‘‘Johnson

Act’’ to limit the authority of States to regulate gambling

devices on vessels.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AUTHORITY OF STATES TO

4 REGULATE GAMBLING DEVICES ON VESSELS.

5 Section 5(b)(2) of the Act of January 2, 1951 (15

6 U.S.C. 1175(b)(2)), commonly referred to as the ‘‘John7 son Act’’, is amended by adding at the end the following:

8 ‘‘(C) EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN VOYAGES

9 AND SEGMENTS.—Except for a voyage or seg10 ment of a voyage that occurs within the bound-
2

•HR 5242 IH

1 aries of the State of Hawaii, a voyage or seg2 ment of a voyage is not described in subpara3 graph (B) if it includes or consists of a seg4 ment—

5 ‘‘(i) that begins and ends in the same

6 State;

7 ‘‘(ii) that is part of a voyage to an8 other State or to a foreign country; and

9 ‘‘(iii) in which the vessel reaches the

10 other State or foreign country within 3

11 days after leaving the State in which it be12 gins.’’.

Æ
§ 95.957 Duration of CBRS Transmissions. ( a ) Except as specified in (b) and (c) of this section, the operator of a CBRS station must limit each on-air conversation with the operators of other CBRS stations to no more than five minutes. After an on-air conversation has ended, the operator of a CBRS station must not transmit again on the same channel for at least one minute.
( b ) When a CBRS operator is directly participating in emergency communications, it does not have to comply with paragraph (a) of this section regarding length of transmissions and pauses between transmissions. However, the operator must obey all other rules.
( c ) When an operator is using its CBRS station to assist a traveler, it does not have to comply with paragraph (a) of this section regarding length of transmissions and pauses between transmissions. However, the operator must obey all other rules.
Summary Sheet for Director and Executive Compensation



 Exhibit 10.37 
 SUMMARY SHEET FOR DIRECTOR AND EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 
 I. Director Compensation 

The compensation payable to each director for services provided as a director during the period beginning after our 2006 annual meeting of stockholders
through our 2007 annual meeting of stockholders, as set on May 3, 2006 by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, was as follows: 
 Other than Messrs. Fisher, Hunter and Rubin, each of the directors elected at the 2006 annual meeting was entitled to receive: 
  

	 	•	 	 an annual cash retainer of $25,000; 


  

	 	•	 	 meeting fees of $1,000 for in-person Board and committee meetings and $500 for telephonic Board and committee meetings; and 


  

	 	•	 	 a restricted stock unit equal to $50,000 on each annual election as a director. 


 In addition, a director receives a one-time RSU grant of $125,000 upon initial election. 
 II. Executive Compensation 
 The
following table sets forth current base salaries of GSI’s CEO and each of the executive officers who were named in the Summary Compensation Table in GSI’s Proxy Statement relating to its 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and who are
expected to be named in the Summary Compensation Table in GSI’s Proxy Statement relating to its 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Named Executive Officers”). 
  

				
	 Name
	  	Base Salary
	 Michael G. Rubin
	  	$	474,000
	 Michael R. Conn
	  	 	375,000
	 Stephen J. Gold
	  	 	389,000
	 Arthur H. Miller
	  	 	378,978
	 Damon Mintzer
	  	 	429,158

 Bonuses 
 2007 Bonus Plan. On March 6, 2007, GSI’s compensation committee approved the 2007 bonus plan, which is not set forth in a written agreement, for certain management-level employees, including the Named
Executive Officers. Under the 2007 bonus plan, eligible senior management level employees, including Named Executive Officers, will receive an annual incentive cash bonus of up to 50% of base salary if: 1) GSI achieves certain adjusted EBITDA
targets and non-GAAP net income targets as determined by the Compensation Committee; and 2) the eligible employee performs at an acceptable level as determined by the CEO. GSI will establish a bonus pool to be paid out to eligible participants. Each
eligible participant’s bonus will be funded from this fixed pool and will be based upon a percentage of that participant’s base salary. 
 Plans
and Other Arrangements 
 The Named Executive Officers are also eligible to participate in: 
  

	 	•	 	 GSI’s 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, which is generally available to director level employees and above; 


  

	 	•	 	 GSI’s Leadership Team Deferral Plan, which is generally available to director level employees and above; and 


  

	 	•	 	 GSI’s broad-based benefit programs generally available to its salaried employees, including health, disability and life insurance programs, and qualified
401(k) plan.
OSLDPS Information Bulletin

No. 00-011 August 14, 2000

TO: All State Administrative Agency Heads

All State Administrative Agency Points of Contact

FROM: C.H. “Butch” Straub, II

Director

SUBJECT: Availability of On-Line Data Collection Tool Local Jurisdiction Data Entry

Module

The Local Jurisdiction Data Entry Module for the on-line data collection tool has now been

activated by the Office for State and Local Domestic Preparedness (OSLDPS), Office of Justice

Programs (OJP). As you know, the on-line data collection tool is being made available for States

who choose to use this method to submit needs assessment data and strategic plans. The Local

Jurisdiction Data Entry Module will allow local first responder and public health jurisdiction users

with valid user id’s and passwords to enter and save data. 

As a reminder, before attempting to enter and save data, all local first responder jurisdiction users

must be approved to use the system by the State Contact from their state’s State Administrative

Agency (SAA). Likewise, all local public health jurisdiction users must be approved by the State

Public Health Representative designated by the State Contact. This approval process is managed

through the on-line data collection tool’s User Registration Module, and includes the issuance of

user id’s and passwords to approved local jurisdiction users.

The Local Jurisdiction Data Entry Module and the User Registration Module may be accessed

from the OSLDPS home page located at the following URL: www.ojp.usdoj.gov/osldps. Icons

for the tool are located under “What’s New” on the home page, as well as on the Assessments

and Grant pages. After you locate the icon, simply click on “Local Jurisdiction Data Entry

Module” or “User Registration Module” and follow the instructions provided.

For technical assistance with the on-line data collection tool, you may contact the OJP toll-free

help line at: 1-888-549-9901. Assistance with the public health assessment may be obtained by

calling the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention help line at: 1-800-747-7649. You may

also contact your OSLDPS program manager for additional information and assistance related to

conduct of the needs assessment and development of your three-year state strategy.
Case 16-24987 Doc 9 Filed 08/04/16 Entered 08/05/16 09:36:55 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
§ 51-9.502 Federal Register notice of establishment of new system or alteration of existing system. ( a ) When the Executive Director receives notice that the Senate, the House of Representatives, and the Office of Management and Budget do not object to the establishment of a new system of records, or the alteration of an existing system of records, or
( b ) When no fewer than 30 days elapse from the submission of the proposal to the Senate, the House of Representatives, and the Office of Management and Budget, without receipt by the Executive Director of an objection to the proposal, then a notice shall be published in the Federal Register of the proposed establishment or alteration of a system of records. The notice shall include all of the information required to be provided by the Privacy Act of 1974, and such other information as deemed necessary.