alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Civ. No. 1586.

Second Appellate District.

September 1, 1914.]

#### GRANT LINCOLN, Respondent, v. D. W. SIBECK, Appellant.

New Trial—Settlement op Statement by Judge Who Did not Try Case—Dismissal op Appeal.—An appeal from an order refusing a new trial will not be dismissed because the statement on the motion for the new trial was not signed by the judge before whom the cause was tried, notwithstanding he was not shown to have been without the state, or otherwise conditioned as is specified in the cases mentioned in section 653 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Id.—Irregularity in Settling Statement—Consideration on Motion to Dismiss Appeal.—The matter of the irregularity of proceedings occurring prior to the making of an order refusing a new trial, cannot be considered on a motion to dismiss the appeal from such order, although the same may constitute sufficient cause for affirming or reversing the order.

MOTION to dismiss appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order refusing a new trial. L. T. Price, Judge presiding.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

James R. Choate, E. O. Leake, and Edgar P. Hughes, for Appellant.

Robert T. Linney, and Ralph W. Schoonover, for Respondent.

THE COURT.

Motion to dismiss appeals from a judgment and from an order denying a motion for a new trial. The grounds of motion are: That the appeals were not taken within the time limited by law; that the statement on motion for a new trial was not settled and allowed as required by law. The motion, in so far as it concerns the appeal taken from the judgment, is not pressed, and it appears that this appeal was regularly taken. The chief complaint as to the statement on motion for a new trial not having been regularly settled, rests upon the fact that the superior judge of Alpine County, who heard the cause at the trial, did not settle the statement, notwithstanding that he was not shown to have been without the state, or otherwise conditioned as is specified in the cases men*332tioned in section 653 of the Code of Civil Procedure. It is not contended as a ground for dismissal that the judge who passed upon the motion for a new trial was without jurisdiction so to do. It has been held that the matter of the irregularity of proceedings occurring prior to the making of an order such as that here appealed from cannot be considered on a motion to dismiss, although the same may constitute sufficient cause for affirming or reversing the order. *(In re Ryer,*110 Cal. 559, [42 Pac. 1082] ; *Fish*v. *Benson,*71 Cal. 428, [12 Pac. 454].) Upon the authority of these decisions the motion to dismiss the appeal from the order denying the motion for a new trial is denied. For the reason first stated the motion as directed to the appeal from the judgment should also be denied, and it is so ordered.
#### § 17.6 State cooperative agreements. [Reserved]
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0987Implementing Peer Support Services in Small and Rural Law Enforcement AgenciesPeer support can be an important part of an officer wellness strategy. Employees may feel more comfortable initially seeking support from a peer who understands the context and has experienced the same stressors. This guide, Planning and Implementing Peer Support Services in Small and Rural Law Enforcement Agencies, provides a roadmap for small and rural law enforcement agencies implementing or enhancing peer support services. It highlights promising practices and provides brief case studies of peer support programs in three small or rural agencies. Topics include establishing trust and buy-in; identifying, training, and supporting team members and leaders; confidentiality; local and regional partnerships; and evaluation metrics.By International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP)Categories: Community PartnershipsLanguage: EnglishLow stockPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0987Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFBook • Feb 2023Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 04:18 (UTC-5) in 0.88 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
<PAGE>   1
                                  Exhibit 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-46800 and 33-44075) of Outlook Group Corp. of
our report dated June 27, 2001, except as to certain information included in
Note G for which the date is July 24, 2001, relating to the financial statements
and of our report dated June 27, 2001 relating to the financial statement
schedules, which appears in this Form 10-K.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Milwaukee, Wisconsin
August 8, 2001
<TABLE> <S> <C>



       
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                           <C>

                                  




<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                              JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                                   JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                                           2,617,813
<SECURITIES>                                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    1,139,804
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        82,000
<INVENTORY>                                                      1,863,694
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 5,815,271
<PP&E>                                                           2,617,706
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   1,531,228
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                   7,082,620
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            1,326,296
<BONDS>                                                            361,627
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                                              0
<COMMON>                                                            59,805
<OTHER-SE>                                                       5,417,570
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                     7,082,620
<SALES>                                                          8,055,271
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                 8,055,271
<CGS>                                                            5,592,871
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    5,592,871
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 2,128,155
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  16,639
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                    441,710
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        36,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                405,710
<DISCONTINUED>                                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                                       405,710
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                          .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                          .07

        














                                                        


</TABLE>
§ 14.172 Primary enclosures. ( a ) A primary enclosure for birds shall have ventilation openings on two vertical sides that comprise at least 16 percent of the surface area of each side and are positioned so as to decrease the likelihood of creating a draft.
( b ) Perches shall be provided for birds that rest by perching. The diameter of the perch shall be sufficient to permit the birds to maintain a firm, comfortable grip. Perches shall be placed so that droppings do not fall into food or water troughs or onto other perched birds. There shall be enough head room to allow the birds to move onto and off the perches without touching the top of the enclosure.
( c ) An enclosure used to transport one or more birds that rest by perching shall be large enough to ensure that sufficient perch space is available for all birds to perch comfortably at the same time. No more than 50 birds that rest by perching shall be transported in one primary enclosure, with the exception of large birds (longer than 23 cm, or 9 inches), which are limited to a maximum of 25 per primary enclosure.
( d ) A primary enclosure used to transport a raptorial bird shall be large enough to transport the bird comfortably and to permit it to turn around without stretching its wings to the fullest extent. Only one raptorial bird shall be contained in a primary enclosure.
( e ) A primary enclosure containing nonraptorial birds that do not rest by perching shall be large enough for the birds to turn around, to lie down, to stand erect, and to change posture in a normal manner.
( f ) Nectar-feeding birds shall either be transported in a primary enclosure equipped with feeding bottles accessible from outside the enclosure for replenishment or hand-carried and fed in accordance with the written instructions of the shipper.
( g ) Birds transported in the same primary enclosure shall be of the same species and be compatible with one another. Birds that are incompatible shall be placed in individual primary enclosures and these enclosures shall not be stored or transported in visual proximity to one another.
Case 16-23322 Doc 6 Filed 07/20/16 Entered 07/20/16 15:40:37 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-23322 Doc 6 Filed 07/20/16 Entered 07/20/16 15:40:37 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
#### § 20.31 Prohibited if taken in violation of subpart C.

No person shall at any time, by any means, or in any manner, possess or have in custody any migratory game bird or part thereof, taken in violation of any provision of subpart C of this part.
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 3.2

                           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                      OF
                     RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

     Mercury Interactive Corporation, a corporation organized and existing under
and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware,

     DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

     FIRST:  That at a meeting of the Board of Directors of Mercury Interactive
Corporation, resolutions were duly adopted setting forth a proposed amendment of
the Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation, declaring said amendment
to be advisable and calling a meeting of the stockholders of said corporation
for consideration thereof.  The resolution setting forth the proposed amendment
is as follows:

     RESOLVED:  that the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of this
corporation by amended by changing the first paragraph of the Article thereof
numbered III so that, as amended said first paragraph of said Article shall be
and read as follows:

     "This corporation is authorized to issue two classes of stock to be
designated, respectively, "Common Stock" and "Preferred Stock".  The total
number of shares which the corporation is authorized to issue is Two Hundred and
Forty Five Million (245,000,000) shares.  Two Hundred and Forty Million
(240,000,000) shares shall be Common Stock and Five Million (5,000,000) shares
shall be Preferred Stock, each with a par value of $.002 per share."

     SECOND:  That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of its Board of Directors,
a  meeting of the stockholders of said corporation was duly called and held,
upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of the General Corporation Law of the
state of Delaware at which meeting the necessary number of share as required by
statue were voted in favor of the amendment.

     THIRD:  That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the
provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Mercury Interactive Corporation has caused this
certificate to be signed by Amnon Landan, its Chief Executive Officer, and Susan
J. Skaer, its Assistant Secretary, this 24th day  of May, 2000.


                                        By:    /s/ Amnon Landan
                                           -------------------------------------
                                               Chief Executive Officer


Attest: /s/ Susan J. Skaer
        ---------------------------------
        Assistant Secretary
§ 18.148 Prohibited take under an LOA. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in this subpart, prohibited taking is described in § 18.11 as well as: intentional take, lethal incidental take of sea otters, and any take that fails to comply with this subpart or with the terms and conditions of an LOA.
( b ) If project activities cause unauthorized take, the applicant must take the following actions: ( 1 ) Cease activities immediately (or reduce activities to the minimum level necessary to maintain safety) and report the details of the incident to the Service MMM at 1-800-362-5148 (business hours) within 48 hours; and
( 2 ) Suspend further activities until the Service has reviewed the circumstances, determined whether additional mitigation measures are necessary to avoid further unauthorized taking, and notified the applicant that project activities may resume.
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0948Family Matters: Executive Guide for Developing Family-Friendly Policies, Procedures, and CultureLaw enforcement officers regularly experience stress and secondary trauma during their shifts and rely on their families and friends as a positive social support network to maintain holistic wellness. The purpose of this executive guide is to create a roadmap for law enforcement agencies to develop stronger family-friendly policies, procedures, and organizational cultures to work in collaboration with officer support networks. The publication and companion tools for families and agencies guide professional dialogue around holistic wellness innovations, best practices to support employees, and opportunities within agencies to strengthen relationships with law enforcement families. The executive guide includes information on employee benefits, family planning, trauma and loss, disciplinary considerations, and retirement planning.By International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP)Categories: Police OperationsLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0948Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFBook • Jun 2021Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 04:31 (UTC-5) in 0.88 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5161

AN ACT

To amend the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993

to permit the prompt sharing of timber sale receipts

of the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTION REGARDING SHAR4 ING OF TIMBER SALE RECEIPTS.

5 (a) FOREST SERVICE.—Section 13982(b)(1) of the

6 Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (Public Law

7 103–66; 107 Stat. 681; 16 U.S.C. 500 note) is amended

8 by inserting ‘‘out of any money in the Treasury not other9 wise appropriated,’’ before ‘‘for the benefit of counties’’.
2

•HR 5161 EH

1 (b) BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT.—Section

2 13983(b)(1) of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of

3 1993 (Public Law 103–66; 107 Stat. 682; 43 U.S.C.

4 1181f note) is amended by inserting ‘‘, out of any money

5 in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated,’’ after ‘‘shall

6 make payments’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 4,

1994

Attest

Clerk.

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5161

AN ACT

To amend the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act

reau of Land Management.sale receipts of the Forest Service and the Buof 1993 to permit the prompt sharing of timber
§ 229.5 Requirements for Category III fisheries. ( a ) *General.* Vessel owners and crew members of such vessels engaged only in Category III fisheries may incidentally take marine mammals without registering for or receiving an Authorization Certificate.
( b ) *Reporting.* Vessel owners engaged in a Category III fishery must comply with the reporting requirements specified in § 229.6.
( c ) *Disposition of marine mammals.* Any marine mammal incidentally taken must be immediately returned to the sea with a minimum of further injury unless directed otherwise by NMFS personnel, a designated contractor, or an official observer, or authorized otherwise by a scientific research permit in the possession of the operator.
( d ) *Monitoring.* Vessel owners engaged in a Category III fishery must comply with the observer requirements specified under § 229.7(d).
( e ) *Deterrence.* When necessary to deter a marine mammal from damaging fishing gear, catch, or other private property, or from endangering personal safety, vessel owners and crew members engaged in commercial fishing operations must comply with all deterrence provisions set forth in the Act and all guidelines and prohibitions published thereunder.
( f ) *Self-defense.* When imminently necessary in self-defense or to save the life of a person in immediate danger, a marine mammal may be lethally taken if such taking is reported to NMFS in accordance with the requirements of § 229.6.
( g ) *Emergency regulations.* Vessel owners engaged in a Category III fishery must comply with any applicable emergency regulations.
[60 FR 45100, Aug. 30, 1995, as amended at 64 FR 9087, Feb. 24, 1999]
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION

) Case No. 16 B 25090

) 

) Chapter 13

)

) Judge: CAROL A DOYLE

RE: SARKESIAN ROBY JOHNSON

debtor

NOTICE OF MOTION

SARKESIAN ROBY JOHNSON

4443 S MICHIGAN AVE #1

CHICAGO, IL 60653

DAVID M SIEGEL

via Clerk's ECF noticing procedures 

Please take notice that on August 27, 2019 at 9:15 am my designee or I will appear before the Honorable 

Judge CAROL A DOYLE at 219 South Dearborn Courtroom 742, Chicago, IL and present the motion set forth 

below.

I certify under penalty of perjury that this office caused a copy of this notice to be delivered to the persons 

named above by U.S. mail at 55 E Monroe St., Chicago, Il 60603 or by the methods indicated on August 13, 

2019.

/s/ Tom Vaughn

TRUSTEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO TURNOVER 

TAX RETURN AND REFUND TO TRUSTEE

Now comes Tom Vaughn, Trustee in the above entitled case and moves the Court to dismiss this case in 

support thereof states:

1. On August 04, 2016 the Debtor filed a petition and/or plan under Chapter 13 of Title 11 U.S.C.

2. The debtor's plan confirmed on December 13, 2016, provided for tax refunds over $1200.00 to be 

 turned over to the trustee each year.

3. The trustee has not received the tax return or transcript, and/or tax refund for 2018.

WHEREFORE, the Trustee prays that this case be dismissed for material default by the debtor with respect 

to a term of a confirmed plan, pursuant to § 1307 (c) (6).

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Tom Vaughn

TOM VAUGHN

CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

55 E. Monroe Street, Suite 3850

Chicago, IL 60603

(312) 294-5900

Case 16-25090 Doc 52 Filed 08/13/19 Entered 08/13/19 15:46:51 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1