alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      21.1**

**Subsidiaries      of Severn Bancorp, Inc.**

| **Entity**                                                                                             | **Jurisdiction                of Formation**                                                     |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Severn                Savings Bank, FSB.                                                          | United                States of America (federally                chartered savings association) |
| Homeowners                Title and Escrow Corporation                                            | Maryland                                                                                    |
| Severn                Financial Services Corporation                                              | Maryland                                                                                    |
| SSB                Realty Holdings, LLC                                                           | Maryland                                                                                    |
| SSB                Realty Holdings II, LLC                                                        | Maryland                                                                                    |
| HS                West, LLC                                                                       | Maryland                                                                                    |
| Louis                Hyatt, Inc. (d/b/a Hyatt Commercial)                                         | Maryland                                                                                    |
| SBI                Mortgage Company                                                               | Maryland                                                                                    |
| Crownsville                Development Corporation (d/b/a                Annapolis Equity Group)  | Maryland                                                                                    |
| Crownsville                Holdings I, LLC                                                        | Maryland                                                                                    |
###### Editorial Note on Part 97

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 97 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 97.117 International communications.

Transmissions to a different country, where permitted, shall be limited to communications incidental to the purposes of the amateur service and to remarks of a personal character.

[71 FR 25982, May 3, 2006]
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

SUCCESSION OF SEALESTA NO. 2021 CW 1404

BOOKER CARNES

JANUARY 31, 2022

In Re: Thomasina C. Boatner, applying for supervisory writs, 

19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton

Rouge, No. 107551. 

BEFORE: McDONALD, LANIER, AND WOLFE, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. 

JMM

WIZ

EW

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

i" 

DEPUTY CL RK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
Editorial Note on Part 74
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 74 appear at 64 FR 4055, Jan. 27, 1999.

§ 74.463 Modulation requirements. ( a ) Each new remote pickup broadcast station authorized to operate with a power output in excess of 3 watts shall be equipped with a device which will automatically prevent modulation in excess of the limits set forth in this subpart.
( b ) If amplitude modulation is employed, modulation shall not exceed 100 percent on negative peaks.
( c ) If frequency modulation is employed, emission shall conform to the requirements specified in § 74.462.
[41 FR 29686, July 19, 1976, as amended at 47 FR 54448, Dec. 3, 1982]
§ 216.107 Incidental harassment authorization for Arctic waters. ( a ) Except for activities that have the potential to result in serious injury or mortality, which must be authorized under § 216.105, incidental harassment authorizations may be issued, following a 30-day public review period, to allowed activities that may result in only the incidental harassment of a small number of marine mammals. Each such incidental harassment authorization shall set forth: ( 1 ) Permissible methods of taking by harassment;
( 2 ) Means of effecting the least practicable adverse impact on the species, its habitat, and on the availability of the species for subsistence uses; and
( 3 ) Requirements for monitoring and reporting, including requirements for the independent peer-review of proposed monitoring plans where the proposed activity may affect the availability of a species or stock for taking for subsistence uses.
( b ) Issuance of an incidental harassment authorization will be based on a determination that the number of marine mammals taken by harassment will be small, will have a negligible impact on the species or stock of marine mammal(s), and will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of species or stocks for taking for subsistence uses.
( c ) An incidental harassment authorization will be either issued or denied within 45 days after the close of the public review period.
( d ) Notice of issuance or denial of an incidental harassment authorization will be published in the Federal Register within 30 days of issuance of a determination.
( e ) Incidental harassment authorizations will be valid for a period of time not to exceed 1 year but may be renewed for additional periods of time not to exceed 1 year for each reauthorization.
( f ) An incidental harassment authorization shall be modified, withdrawn, or suspended if, after notice and opportunity for public comment, the Assistant Administrator determines that: ( 1 ) The conditions and requirements prescribed in the authorization are not being substantially complied with; or
( 2 ) The authorized taking, either individually or in combination with other authorizations, is having, or may have, more than a negligible impact on the species or stock or, where relevant, an unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of the species or stock for subsistence uses.
( g ) The requirement for notice and opportunity for public review in paragraph (f) of this section shall not apply if the Assistant Administrator determines that an emergency exists that poses a significant risk to the well-being of the species or stocks of marine mammals concerned.
( h ) A violation of any of the terms and conditions of an incidental harassment authorization shall subject the holder and/or any individual who is operating under the authority of the holder's incidental harassment authorization to penalties provided in the MMPA.
(function ($) {

/**
 * A progressbar object. Initialized with the given id. Must be inserted into
 * the DOM afterwards through progressBar.element.
 *
 * method is the function which will perform the HTTP request to get the
 * progress bar state. Either "GET" or "POST".
 *
 * e.g. pb = new progressBar('myProgressBar');
 *      some_element.appendChild(pb.element);
 */
Drupal.progressBar = function (id, updateCallback, method, errorCallback) {
  var pb = this;
  this.id = id;
  this.method = method || 'GET';
  this.updateCallback = updateCallback;
  this.errorCallback = errorCallback;

  // The WAI-ARIA setting aria-live="polite" will announce changes after users
  // have completed their current activity and not interrupt the screen reader.
  this.element = $('<div class="progress" aria-live="polite"></div>').attr('id', id);
  this.element.html('<div class="bar"><div class="filled"></div></div>' +
                    '<div class="percentage"></div>' +
                    '<div class="message"> </div>');
};

/**
 * Set the percentage and status message for the progressbar.
 */
Drupal.progressBar.prototype.setProgress = function (percentage, message) {
  if (percentage >= 0 && percentage <= 100) {
    $('div.filled', this.element).css('width', percentage + '%');
    $('div.percentage', this.element).html(percentage + '%');
  }
  $('div.message', this.element).html(message);
  if (this.updateCallback) {
    this.updateCallback(percentage, message, this);
  }
};

/**
 * Start monitoring progress via Ajax.
 */
Drupal.progressBar.prototype.startMonitoring = function (uri, delay) {
  this.delay = delay;
  this.uri = uri;
  this.sendPing();
};

/**
 * Stop monitoring progress via Ajax.
 */
Drupal.progressBar.prototype.stopMonitoring = function () {
  clearTimeout(this.timer);
  // This allows monitoring to be stopped from within the callback.
  this.uri = null;
};

/**
 * Request progress data from server.
 */
Drupal.progressBar.prototype.sendPing = function () {
  if (this.timer) {
    clearTimeout(this.timer);
  }
  if (this.uri) {
    var pb = this;
    // When doing a post request, you need non-null data. Otherwise a
    // HTTP 411 or HTTP 406 (with Apache mod_security) error may result.
    $.ajax({
      type: this.method,
      url: this.uri,
      data: '',
      dataType: 'json',
      success: function (progress) {
        // Display errors.
        if (progress.status == 0) {
          pb.displayError(progress.data);
          return;
        }
        // Update display.
        pb.setProgress(progress.percentage, progress.message);
        // Schedule next timer.
        pb.timer = setTimeout(function () { pb.sendPing(); }, pb.delay);
      },
      error: function (xmlhttp) {
        pb.displayError(Drupal.ajaxError(xmlhttp, pb.uri));
      }
    });
  }
};

/**
 * Display errors on the page.
 */
Drupal.progressBar.prototype.displayError = function (string) {
  var error = $('<div class="messages error"></div>').html(string);
  $(this.element).before(error).hide();

  if (this.errorCallback) {
    this.errorCallback(this);
  }
};

})(jQuery);
#### § 216.85 Walrus and Otter Islands.

By Executive Order 1044, dated February 27, 1909, Walrus and Otter Islands were set aside as bird reservations. All persons are prohibited to land on these islands except those authorized by the appropriate representative of the National Marine Fisheries Service.

[41 FR 49488, Nov. 9, 1976. Redesignated at 61 FR 11750, Mar. 22, 1996]
**Read more of the October Dispatch**
    - The Methuen Police Department: Officer Wellness Isn’t Just About the Physical Anymore
    - The Camden County Police Department: An Agency of Empowerment
    - Assistance in Combating Domestic Violence
    - Come see the COPS Office at IACP
    - The Community Policing in Action Photo Contest is Now Open
    - Enhancing Community Policing Through an Effective LPR Strategy
    - Improving School Safety: The 2nd Annual National Summit of State Tip Lines
    - Securing the Future of Law Enforcement by Looking to the Past: The Rapid City Recruitment Program
    - Director's Corner: Crime Prevention
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000868373
<NAME> DIGITAL BIOMETRICS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       3,175,868
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,543,921
<ALLOWANCES>                                   128,587
<INVENTORY>                                  2,972,998
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,760,087
<PP&E>                                       2,744,454
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,783,030
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,746,781
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,375,278
<BONDS>                                        148,097
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       160,176
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,970,153
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,746,781
<SALES>                                     18,214,126
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,199,250
<CGS>                                       12,034,849
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,954,356
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,862,353
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             299,397
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 98,888
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             98,888
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    98,888
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01


</TABLE>
**Exhibit
      21.3**








CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement numbers
      33-76036, 33-99096, 333-35122 and 333-81916 of Home Federal Bancorp on Form
      S-8
      of our reports dated March 15, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial
      statements of Home Federal Bancorp and subsidiaries, and management's report
      on
      the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in
      this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Home Federal Bancorp for the year ended
      December 31, 2006.














Cincinnati,
      OH


March
      15,
      2007
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer furnished pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title
18 of the United States Code (18 U.S. C. 1350)



I, William
John Chappell, Senior Vice President and the Chief Financial Officer of Trikon Technologies, Inc (the Company), do hereby certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that:



1. The Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 780(d)); and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



Dated:  March 15, 2005



/s/    WILLIAM J
CHAPPELLWilliam J Chappell Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 169 (Thursday, August 31, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 51885]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7309]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending August 11, 2006

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et. seq.). The due date for Answers, 
Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: OST-2006-25577.
    Date Filed: August 8, 2006.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: August 29, 2006.
    Description: Application of Taga Air Charter Service, Inc. 
requesting authority to engage in scheduled passenger operations 
between the Northern Mariana Islands, Saipan, Tinian and Rota, 
eventually expanding to include service to Guam as a commuter air 
carrier.
    Docket Number: OST-2006-25616.
    Date Filed: August 11, 2006.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: September 1, 2006.
    Description: Application of ELYSAIR SAS d/b/a ELYSAIR requesting a 
foreign air carrier permit to engage in (i) Scheduled foreign air 
transportation of persons, property and mail between any point or 
points in France and points in the United States coextensive with the 
rights provided under the bilateral agreement, and (ii) charter foreign 
air transportation of persons, property and mail pursuant to the U.S.-
France Air Transport Agreement and Part 212.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 06-7309 Filed 8-30-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
Hillsborough,

No. 4547.

#### Walter G. Suprenant *& a v.*Nashua *& a.*

Argued January 3, 1957.

Decided May 9, 1957.

*44*Nicholas Paútelas*for the plaintiffs.

*Louis M. Janette*and *Normand B. Pelletier (Mr. Janette*orally), for the defendants.

Blandin, J.

It is provided by RSA 31:78 that upon appeal to the Superior Court from a decision by the board, “Upon the hearing the burden of proof shall be upon the party seeking to set aside any order or decision of the board ... to show that the same is unreasonable or unlawful, and all findings of-the board . . . upon all questions of fact properly before it *shall be deemed to be prima facie lawful and reasonable;*and the order or decision appealed from shall not be set aside or vacated, except for errors of law, unless the court is persuaded by the balance of probabilities, on the evidence before it, that said order or decision is unjust or unreasonable.” (Emphasis supplied). The board here states that in reaching its decision it gave “due consideration ... to the diminution of value of surrounding properties, the benefit to the public interest, the unnecessary hardship involved, the justice to be done,” *45and that “its decision was not contrary to the spirit of the ordinance.” The plaintiffs do not deny that such consideration was given although they dispute the conclusions reached. The board also took a view of the area before issuing a permit to the defendants but no view was requested of or taken by the Court. This view by the board may have “furnished a vital part of the evidence” upon which its decision was based. *Gelinas*v. *Portsmouth,*97 N. H. 248, 251, and authority cited. The record discloses that numerous variances including a garage, filling station, ice cream stand and a monument company are already established in the same zoning district. The board before issuing the permit considered all the requirements necessary to warrant the granting of a variance *(Gelinas*v. *Portsmouth, supra,*250) and found that they all existed. We believe on the entire record that the board granted a variance rather than a special exception (see *Jadda*v. *Manchester,*100 N. H. 150, 152) and its action was not shown to be “unreasonable or unlawful.” RSA 31:78.

The question actually before the Superior Court was the effect of s. 43 (f) of the ordinance of the defendant city dealing with the requirement of the consent of the adjoining land owners and the testimony introduced at that hearing bore on that issue. In these circumstances and in the absence of a view by the Court, we do not believe there was sufficient evidence before it to warrant overturning the board’s finding that cause for a variance existed in the face of RSA 31:78. See *Jadda*v. *Manchester, supra.*It follows the order is

*Judgment for the defendants.*

Wheeler, J., took no part in the decision; the others concurred.
**MEMORANDUM**

**DATE:** 0 7 / 1 4/2015 **FROM:** Laura Farris/EPA Region 8 **TO:** Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR
– 2013
- 0602 **SUBJECT:** Eagle County Climate Challenge on 0 7 / 13 /2015 **SUMMARY :**  Laura Farris participated in a panel discussion on 07 / 13 /2015 on the Clean Power Plan at the Eagle County Climate Challenge . The meeting was held in Edwards , Colorado
. The Clean Power Plan was proposed on June 2, 2014. **ATTENDEES: EPA**  Laura Farris, EPA Region 8 **External Stakeholders**  Robert Castellino, Climate Colorado Piper Foster, Consultant Heather Bailey, Energy Strategy and Electric Utility Development Shawn Bruckman, Vail Honeywagon David Ellenberger, National Wildlife Federation John Jimison, Energy Future Coalition Dave F innigan, Climate Change is Elementary Ryan Palmer, Eagle County Irene Vilar, Americas Latino Eco Festival Kat Habrer, TEDxVail Phillip Haberman, Denver Public Schools Jason Hardy, Mechanical Integrity Coordinator Jake McCaffrey, Ownership Culture Initiative General public
Case 16-24176 Doc 1 Filed 07/27/16 Entered 07/27/16 19:16:00 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 7
Case 16-24176 Doc 1 Filed 07/27/16 Entered 07/27/16 19:16:00 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 7
Case 16-24176 Doc 1 Filed 07/27/16 Entered 07/27/16 19:16:00 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 7
Case 16-24176 Doc 1 Filed 07/27/16 Entered 07/27/16 19:16:00 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 7
Case 16-24176 Doc 1 Filed 07/27/16 Entered 07/27/16 19:16:00 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 7
Case 16-24176 Doc 1 Filed 07/27/16 Entered 07/27/16 19:16:00 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 7
Case 16-24176 Doc 1 Filed 07/27/16 Entered 07/27/16 19:16:00 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 7
§ 216.12 Prohibited importation. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in subparts C and D of this part 216, it is unlawful for any person to import any marine mammal or marine mammal product into the United States.
( b ) Regardless of whether an importation is otherwise authorized pursuant to subparts C and D of this part 216, it is unlawful for any person to import into the United States any: ( 1 ) Marine mammal: ( i ) Taken in violation of the MMPA, or
( ii ) Taken in another country in violation to the laws of that country;
( 2 ) Any marine mammal product if ( i ) The importation into the United States of the marine mammal from which such product is made would be unlawful under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, or
( ii ) The sale in commerce of such product in the country of origin if the product is illegal.
( c ) Except in accordance with an exception referred to in subpart C and §§ 216.31 (regarding scientific research permits only) and 216.32 of this part 216, it is unlawful to import into the United States any: ( 1 ) Marine mammal which was pregnant at the time of taking.
( 2 ) Marine mammal which was nursing at the time of taking, or less than 8 months old, whichever occurs later.
( 3 ) Specimen of an endangered or threatened species of marine mammal.
( 4 ) Specimen taken from a depleted species or stock of marine mammals, or
( 5 ) Marine mammal taken in an inhumane manner.
( d ) It is unlawful to import into the United States any fish, whether fresh, frozen, or otherwise prepared, if such fish was caught in a manner proscribed by the Secretary of Commerce for persons subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, whether or not any marine mammals were in fact taken incident to the catching of the fish.
[39 FR 1852, Jan. 15, 1974, as amended at 59 FR 50375, Oct. 3, 1994]