alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 11957A159 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957A159

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY ( E.A.E.C. - EURATOM ), TITLE THREE - PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INSTITUTIONS, CHAPTER I: THE INSTITUTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY, SECTION IV: THE COURT OF JUSTICE, ARTICLE 159 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 159

THE JUDGMENTS OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE SHALL BE ENFORCEABLE UNDER THE CONDITIONS LAID DOWN IN ARTICLE 164 .
§ 253.1 Purpose. ( a ) The regulations in this part pertain to fisheries assistance programs. Subpart B of this part governs the Fisheries Finance Program (FFP or the Program), which makes capacity neutral long-term direct fisheries and aquaculture loans. The FFP conducts all credit investigations, makes all credit determinations and holds and services all credit collateral.
( b ) Subpart C of this part implements Public Law 99-659 (16 U.S.C. 4100 *et seq.*), which has two objectives: ( 1 ) Promote and encourage State activities in support of the management of interjurisdictional fishery resources identified in interstate or Federal fishery management plans; and
( 2 ) Promote and encourage management of interjurisdictional fishery resources throughout their range.
( 3 ) The scope of this part includes guidance on making financial assistance awards to States or Interstate Commissions to undertake projects in support of management of interjurisdictional fishery resources in both the executive economic zone (EEZ) and State waters, and to encourage States to enter into enforcement agreements with either the Department of Commerce or the Department of the Interior.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                          SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT*


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
COMPANY NAME                                                   STATE OF INCORPORATION
------------                                                   ----------------------        
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
<S>                                               <C>          <C>
Metropolitan Investment Securities, Inc.          (1)              Washington
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Summit Group Holding Company, Inc.                                 Delaware
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Summit Property Development, Inc.                                  Washington
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Old Standard Life Insurance Company               (2)              Idaho
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Old West Life Insurance & Annuity Company         (3)              Arizona
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
</TABLE>

*    Summit Securities, Inc. uses the following DBA in some states:
          National Summit Securities, Inc.


(1)  Metropolitan Investment Securities, Inc. uses the following DBA in some
     states:
          Washington Metropolitan Investment Securities, Inc.
          National Metropolitan Investment Securities, Inc.

(2)  Old Standard Life Insurance Company uses the following DBA in some states:
          Old Standard Company
          Old Standard       
          Old Standard Life   

(3)  Old West Life Insurance & Annuity Company was formerly known as Arizona
     Life Insurance Company.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jupitermedia Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Christopher J. Baudouin, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                            
|/s/    Christopher J.
Baudouin                                              
|                                                                            
|Christopher J. Baudouin Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



August 9, 2005



This certification is made solely for the purpose
of 18 U.S.C. § 1350, subject to the knowledge standard therein, and not for any other purpose.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1996 AND THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997,
1996 AND 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM
10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                           5,442
<SECURITIES>                                    27,870
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,240
<ALLOWANCES>                                       613
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,266
<PP&E>                                          11,804
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,894
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  52,154
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,978
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       140,101
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    52,154
<SALES>                                         12,496
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,298
<CGS>                                              563
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,235
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 120
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,240
<INCOME-TAX>                                       391
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,849
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,849
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10
        

</TABLE>
Case 16-24648 Doc 4 Filed 08/01/16 Entered 08/01/16 09:34:06 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-24648 Doc 4 Filed 08/01/16 Entered 08/01/16 09:34:06 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INTERNET.COM
CORPORATION'S UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE
PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          30,211
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,064
<ALLOWANCES>                                       393
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,084
<PP&E>                                           2,666
<DEPRECIATION>                                     425
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  65,442
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,181
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           233
<OTHER-SE>                                      59,634
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    65,442
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,598
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,938
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,151
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (18,110)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (18,110)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (18,110)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.94)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.94)


</TABLE>
|                  |   |                                                                                                                                                                       |
|-----------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  |   |                                                                                                                                                                       |   |
| Date: August 11, 2009 | By:    | /s/ Ryan Corley                          |   |
|                  |   | Ryan Corley                                                                                                                                                                |   |
|                  |   | Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                    |   |
|                  |   | (Principal Executive Officer)                                                                                                                                              |   |

| Date: August 11, 2009 | By:    | /s/ Stephen Hoelscher                 |   |
|-----------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                  |   | Stephen Hoelscher                                                                                                          |   |
|                  |   | Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                    |   |
|                  |   | (Principal Financial Officer)                                                                                              |   |
[Crim. No. 254.

Third Appellate District.

September 10, 1914.]

#### THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. H. D. SUHR, Appellant.

Cbiminal Law—Homicide.—Judgment and order denying a new trial affirmed on the authority of *People*v. *Ford, ante,*p. 388.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yuba County and from an order refusing a new trial. Eugene P. McDaniel, Judge.

The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in *People*v. *Ford, ante,*p. 388.

R. W. Royce, and Austin Lewis, for Appellant.

U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, and J. Charles Jones, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.

THE COURT.

It was stipulated that Crim. No. 253, *People*v. *Ford,*and Crim. No. 254, *People*v. *Suhr,*should be tried together and that the appeals in both eases should be heard on the record brought up in Crim. No. 253, *People*v. *Ford.*The law and the facts in both cases have been fully considered in *People*v. *Ford, ante,*p. 388, [143 Pac. 1075], this day decided.

Upon the authority of that case and for the reasons therein given,

The judgment and order are affirmed.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on November 9, 1914.
No. 11-9118.

#### Jones *v.*Conley.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 17.106 Emergency establishment of protection areas. ( a ) The Director may establish a manatee protection area under the provisions of paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section at any time he determines there is substantial evidence that there is imminent danger of a taking of one or more manatees, and that such establishment is necessary to prevent such a taking.
( b ) The establishment of a manatee protection area under this section shall become effective immediately upon completion of the following requirements: ( 1 ) Publication of a notice containing the information required by § 17.103 of this section in a newspaper of general circulation in each county, if any, in which the protection area lies; and
( 2 ) Posting of the protection area with signs clearly marking its boundaries.
( c ) Simultaneously with the publication required by paragraph (b) of this section, the Director shall publish the same notice in the Federal Register. If simultaneous publication is impractical, because of the time involved or the nature of a particular emergency situation, failure to publish notice in the Federal Register simultaneously shall not delay the effective date of the emergency establishment. In such a case, notice shall be published in the Federal Register as soon as possible.
( d ) No emergency establishment of a protection area shall be effective for more than 120 days. Termination of an emergency establishment of a protection area shall be accomplished by publishing notice of the termination in the Federal Register and in a newspaper of general circulation in each county, if any, in which the protection area lies.
( e ) Within 10 days after establishing a protection area in accordance with this section, the Director shall commence proceedings to establish the area in accordance with § 17.103.
EXHIBIT 11.

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000

(ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST HUNDRED DOLLARS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)





Weighted average number of common shares outstanding               8,308,727
                                                                 ------------
Common stock equivalents - stock options                                   0
Common stock equivalents - preferred stock                                 0
                                                                 ------------
Average common and common stock equivalents outstanding            8,308,727
                                                                 ------------
Net income (loss)                                                $   (98,900)
                                                                 ------------
Earnings per share(1)                                            $     (0.01)
                                                                 ------------

(1)      Fully diluted earnings per share have not been presented because the
         effects are not material.


<PAGE>
# FILED July 17, 1998 Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Cou rt Clerk IN THE COURT OF CR IMINAL A PPEALS OF TENN ESSEE AT NASHVILLE STATE OF TENN ESSEE, ) ) C.C.A. NO. 01C

01-9801-CR-00034 Appellee, ) ) DAVIDSON COUNTY VS. ) (No. 94-D -196 3 Bel ow) ) The Hon. Seth Norman JOHN GILBREA

TH, ) ) (Motion to Alter or A mend Judgment) Appellant. ) REVERSED AND REMANDED

O R D E R

This cause came

to be heard on the motion of the state to remand this case fora determination regarding whether the petitioner’s conviction for aggravated assault in count ten of his indictment was th e result of a clerical er ror. It appears from the record that the petitioner entered guilty pleas on March 16 , 1995, to s everal offenses. The plea agreementand the transcript of the guilty plea hearing reflect that the petitioner pled gui lty to aggravated robbery i n count ten . In contrast, the judgment for m indicates that the petitioner

pled guilty to aggravated assault in count ten. However, the aggravated robbery statute is cited in the judgment for m. Subsequently, onDecember 4, 1997, the petitioner filed a pro se Motion to Cor rect/Amendment Judgment in the tri al court. The trial court’s order denying the motion stated in part:

T he defendant has submitted a transcri pt that shows that th e defendant pled to ag gravated ro bbery. The judgment form as enteredon the minutes, and the minute entry, show that the defendant pled to aggrav ated assault. The s ent ence imposed was 10 years. The defendant now seeks to alter the judgment. The Court is required t o rely upon the minutes of the Court, not a transcript. A Court speaks through its minutes.

As pointed out by the state, w hen there is a conflict betw een the trans cript and the court minutes, the transcript controls. See State v. Moore , 814 S.W.2d 381, 383 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1991 ) (citing State v. Zyla , 628 S.W.2d 39, 42 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1981) and Farmer v. State , 574 S.W.2d 49, 50 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1978)). Mor eover, pursuant to Tenn. R. Crim. P. 36, “[c] l erical mistakes in judg ments, orders, or other part s of the-2-

record and errors in the record arising from oversight or omissi on may be correctedby the court at any time and after suc h notice, if any, as the cour t orders.”

From a review of the record , it is clear that the judgment form merely reflec ts a clerical error. A

ccordingly, w

e find that the judgmen t form and the minutes of the trial court should be corrected to show that the petitioner pled guilty to aggravated robbery in count ten of the indictment.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that th is matte r is remanded and the trial court shall co rrect the judgment form and the minutes to r eflect that the petitioner pled guilty to aggr

avated robbery in count ten of the indictment. Costs ar e taxed to the state.

________________________________ THOMAS T. WOODALL, JUDGE CONCUR:

________________________________ JOHN H. PEAY, JUDG E

________________________________ JERRY L. SMITH, JUD GE
# United

~ 

# tatcs

~ 

# enate WASHINGTON, DC 20510 March 3, 2009

The Honorable Jeff Bingaman The Honorable Lisa Murkowski Chairman Ranking Member 

### Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Committee on Energy and Natural Resources United States Senate United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20510

Dear Senators Bingaman and Murkowski, 

### We understand that you intend to introduce legislation to implement a national renewable electricity standard. As you think about how to transition our nation toward cleaner energy production, we urge you to consider including less-traditional, but nonetheless effective, non-fossil fuel energy sources — like waste-to-energy — in your bill's definition of the term "renewable." 

### Waste-to-energy can provide double benefits: it diminishes waste reserves and produces clean energy while offsetting greenhouse gas emissions. As our nation's energy needs grow and we continue to discern how best to meet them, we think it is important to take 

### an inclusive view of the ways in which already-existing technologies can be used to reduce our dependence on fossil fuels. The nation's 87 waste-to-energy facilities safely manage approximately 29 million tons of 

### household refuse each year, and they have an electric capacity of 2,700 megawatts. Each one operates pursuant to environmentally rigorous Maximum Achievable Controi Technology (MACT) standards. Through the combustion of waste that would have otherwise been landfilled, these facilities decrease our reliance on fossil-fuel fired electric generation. Waste-to-energy is already considered a renewabie energy source by states across the 

### country and nations around the world. For that reason and the ones articulated above, we urge you to consider including waste-to-energy in your bill's definition of the term "renewable." 

### This Congress, we have an opportunity to promote the development of clean, renewable energy sources that will simultaneously reduce our dependence on foreign oil and curb our 

### nation's greenhouse gas emissions while creating jobs and supporting American technological innovation. It would only help us meet our clean energy production goals to think broadly about what types of energy are considered renewable, understanding that stringent environmental 

### standards must remain paramount in any such assessment. We look forward to working with you to accomplish that task.

i Cerely,

o ,



### -. .._

~ Joseph I. Lieberman Christopher podd Daniel K. Akaka U.S. SENATOR U.S. SENATOR U.S SENATOR 

# /~

0 r~ r ~



### Benjamin L. Cardin U.S. SENATOR Robert P. Casey, Jr. Ron Wyde U.S. SENATOR U.S. SEN OR

Bill Nelson Charles chumer U.S. SENATOR U.S. SENATOR

ra k R. au er U.S. SENATOR 

### Fi Spedvdst e SENATOR eyiel'Si Kirsten E. Gillibrand U.S. SENATOR



### . ~ Susan M. Collins U.S. SENATOR
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the annual report of Entorian Technologies Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the
year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, W. Kirk Patterson, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to Title 18, Chapter
63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: August 13, 2008



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ W. Kirk Patterson                            
|W. Kirk Patterson                                
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.