alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, DoD.

# ACTION:

 Notice of open meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, this notice announces the annual meeting of the Department of Defense Historical Advisory Committee. The committee will conduct reports from Army and Navy Historical Advisory Committees for future submission to higher authority. The meeting will be open to the public.

# DATES:

Wednesday, September 27th at 10 a.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held on the 12th Floor, Conference Room #4, 1777 North Kent Street, Arlington, Virginia 22209.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mrs. Pamela Bennett at 703-588-7889 for information, and Ms. Carolyn Thorne at 703-588-7890 or Dr. Diane Putney at 703-588-7875 upon arrival at the building in order to be admitted.

Dated: August 29, 2006.

C.R. Choate,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 06-7445 Filed 9-5-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 157 (Tuesday, August 15, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46920-46921]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6931]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Reclamation


Second Public Meeting for Reclamation's Managing for Excellence 
Project

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

ACTION:  Notice of announcement of a public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Reclamation is holding a meeting to inform the 
public about the Managing for Excellence project. This meeting is the 
second of three meetings that will be held in 2006 to inform the public 
about the action items, progress, and results of the Managing for 
Excellence project and to seek broad feedback. A subsequent meeting 
will likely be held November 2006 in Sacramento, California.

DATES: September 19, 2006, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., and September 20, 2006, 8 
a.m. to 12 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Salt Lake City Marriott University Park, 480 Wakara Way, 
Salt Lake City, UT 84104, Ballroom 2 and 3, 1st Floor.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Staci Link (303) 445-2808.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Managing for Excellence Project will 
identify and address the specific 21st Century challenges Reclamation 
must

[[Page 46921]]

meet to fulfill its mission to manage, develop, and protect water and 
related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner 
in the interest of the American public. This project will examine 
Reclamation's core capabilities and the agency's ability to respond to 
both expected and unforeseeable future needs in an innovative and 
timely manner. This project will result in essential changes in a 
number of key areas, which are outlined in, Managing for Excellence--An 
Action Plan for the 21st Century Bureau of Reclamation. For more 
information regarding the Project, Action Plan, and specific actions 
being taken, please visit the Managing for Excellence Web page at 
http://www.usbr.gov/excellence.

Registration

    Although you may register the first day of the conference starting 
at 7:30 a.m., we highly encourage you to register online at http://www.usbr.gov/excellence, or by phone at 303-445-2808.

    Dated: August 3, 2006.
William E. Rinne,
Acting Commissioner, Washington Office.
[FR Doc. 06-6931 Filed 8-14-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MN-M
#### William A. Cahir *et al. vs.*Armand H. Cote, Secretary of State. Isaac Moses *vs.*Same.

OCTOBER 22, 1946.

Present: Flynn, C. J., Moss, Capotosto, Baker and. Condon, JJ.

Per Curiam.

These petitions for *certiorari*were brought by petitioner Cahir et al. on behalf of the Citizens’ Independent Party and by petitioner Moses on behalf of the Good Government party to quash as illegal certain alleged rulings or actions of the secretary of state in connection with his preparation of the diagram of the face of the voting machines and of the ballot labels to be used in said voting machines in the city of Providence at the election to be held on November 5, 1946.

The matters complained of have been considered and decided on the petitioners’ separate petitions for mandamus, 72 R. I. 188, 193. The instant petitions for *certiorari*therefore need not be considered and they are denied and dismissed.

*199
      *George Roche,*for petitioners Cahir et al.

*Isadore 8. Horenstein,*for petitioner Moses.

*John H. Nolan,*Atty. G., *J. Frederick Murphy,*Asst. Atty. G., *William J. Counihan, Jr.,*for respondent.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Digital communicationperformance parameters for proposed Federal standard 1003 [electronic resource]**
 
SuDoc Number:C 60.10:78-4

Item Number:0126-D-03 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000790484
 
Volumes: 01 | 02
 
May 5, 2020
• 

RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 42 

Exception Reporting for Small Quantity Generators of Hazardous Waste 

52 FR 35894-35899 . 

September 23, 1987 

(HSWA Cluster II) 

STATE ANALOG IS:
 

FEDERAL ANALOGOUS MORE BROADFEDERAL RCRA STATE EQUIV- STRIN- ER IN 

REQUIREMENT CITATION CITATION ALENt GENT SCOPE 

PART 262 - STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO GENERATORS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE WAC 173~303
 

SUBPART D -RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING
 

EXCEPTION REPORTING
 

• 

generators greater 

than 1,000 kg/mo. or 

than 1 kg/mo. of 

acute waste 262.42(a)(1) 220(2)(a) X 

generators greater 

than 1,000 kg/mo. 262.42(a)(2) 220(2)(b) & (c) X 

generators 100 to 

1,000 kg/mo. 262.42(b) 220(2)(a) X 

SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR GENERATORS OF BETWEEN 100 AND 1000 KG/MO 

changes in introductory paragraph 262.44 210& 220 X 

additional 262.42(b) 

requirement 262.44(a-c) 210 & 220 X 

• September 23, 1987 - Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 16 (Wednesday, January 25, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 4052]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-754]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 06-19; MB Docket No. 03-74, RM-10676]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Eden, TX

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Audio Division, at the request of Linda Crawford, allots 
Channel 294A at Eden, Texas, as the community's second local FM 
service. Channel 294A can be allotted to Eden, Texas, in compliance 
with the Commission's minimum distance separation requirements with a 
site restriction of 11.4 kilometers (7.1 miles) southwest of Eden. The 
coordinates for Channel 294A at Eden, Texas, are 31-10-00 North 
Latitude and 99-57-01 West Longitude. Although Mexican concurrence has 
been requested, notification has not been received. If a construction 
permit for Channel 294A at Eden, Texas, is granted prior to receipt of 
formal concurrence by the Mexican government, the authorization will 
include the following condition: ``Operation with the facilities 
specified herein for Eden, Texas, is subject to modification, 
suspension, or termination without right to hearing, if found by the 
Commission to be necessary in order to conform to the Mexico-United 
States FM Broadcast Agreement, or if specifically objected to by the 
Government of Mexico.''

DATES: Effective February 21, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deborah Dupont, Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MB Docket No. 03-74, adopted January 4, 2006, and 
released January 6, 2006. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-
A257, Washington, DC 20554. The complete text of this decision also may 
be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Best Copy 
and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC, 
20554, (800) 378-3160, or via the company's Web site, http://www.bcpiweb.com. The Commission will send a copy of this Report and 
Order in a report to be sent to Congress and the Government 
Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 
U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio, Radio broadcasting.

0
Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as 
follows:

PART 73--RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES

0
1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334 and 336.


Sec.  73.202  [Amended]

0
2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Texas, is 
amended by adding Channel 294A at Eden.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 06-754 Filed 1-24-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
§ 90.771 Field strength limits. ( a ) The transmissions from base stations, or fixed stations transmitting on base station transmit frequencies, of EA and Regional licensees may not exceed a predicted 38 dBu field strength at their EA or REAG border. The predicted 38 dBu field strength is calculated using the F(50,50) field strength chart for Channels 7-13 in § 73.699 (Fig. 10) of this chapter, with a 9 dB correction factor for antenna height differential.
( b ) Licensees will be permitted to exceed the predicted 38 dBu field strength required in paragraph (a) of this section if all affected, co-channel EA and Regional licensees agree to the higher field strength.
( c ) EA and Regional licensees must coordinate to minimize interference at or near their EA and REAG borders, and must cooperate to resolve any instances of interference in accordance with the provisions of § 90.173(b).
**Exhibit
      32.1**





Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer of


Commercial
      National Financial Corporation


Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
      connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Commercial National Financial
      Corporation (the “Corporation”) for the period ending December 31, 2006 (the
“Report”), I, Gregg E. Hunter, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
                15 (d) of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Commercial
                National Financial Corporation.








/s/
                Gregg E. HunterGregg
                E. HunterChief
                Executive OfficerMarch
                27, 2007








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Commercial National Financial Corporation and will be retained by Commercial
      National Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
Evidence Table 10.  Is intraocular pressure lowered more by a staged glaucoma and cataract surgery or by simultaneous cataract and glaucoma surgery?

								Outcomes/Benefits

Study design: Cohort Studies

Murchison, Shields, 1989

United States

Followup: 12 to 23 months

Quality: 44%

	1	34	NR	NR	ECCE

Scleral	NR	-2.20	NR	NR	NR	NR	NR

	2	22	NR	NR	ECCE

Scleral	NR	-1.70	NR	NR	NR	NR	NR

	3	22	NR	NR	ECCE

Clear cornea	NR	-11.69	NR	NR	NR	NR	NR

Study design: Case-control studies

Caprioli, Park, Kwon et al., 1997

United States

Followup: ≥ 24 months

Quality: Not Applicable	1	40	0.10	NR	Phaco.

Clear Cornea	0.18	-0.20	NR	NR	NR	0.6	NR

	2	40	0.05	NR	No CE	NR	0.3	NR	NR	NR	0.7	NR

Donoso, Rodriguez, 2000

Chile

Followup: 12 to 23 months

Quality: Not Applicable

	1	18	NR	NR	Phaco.

Scleral	NR	1.80	NR	18	NR	0	0

	2	22	NR	NR	Phaco.

Scleral

1-site	NR	-7.59	NR	22	NR	NR	NR

El-Sayyad, Helal, Khalil et al.,  1999

Saudi Arabia

Followup: Not Reported

Quality: Not Applicable

	1	53	0.25	0	Phaco.

Scleral

Clear cornea	NR	-13.79	NR	96	NR	NR	5

	2	53	0.23	0	Phaco.

Scleral	NR	-14.70	NR	60	NR	NR	2
#### § 95.2777 [Reserved]
#### In the Matter of McMillan Book Company, Inc., et al., Petitioners, *v.*State Division of Human Rights et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Onondaga County,

November 16, 1970.

*Bruce O. So den*for petitioners. *Sam Singer*for respondents.

J. Egbert Lynch, J.

The petitioners move under article 78 of the CPLB to prohibit á public hearing before the respondent State Division of Human Eights. The respondent cross-moves, pursuant to CPLB 7804 (subd. [f]) to dismiss the petition as insufficient in law.

On January 8, 1970 the petitioners were served with a complaint brought against them to the respondent division by the respondent Geraldine V. Santy. On September 18, 1970 they were served with a notice of a public hearing on the complaint. It is this hearing which is sought to be prohibited. The petitioners argue that paragraph a of subdivision 4 of section 297 of the Executive Law mandates that the notice must be served within 60 days of the filing of the complaint and that since this was not done the respondent division has lost its jurisdiction to proceed.

The respondent division argues in opposition that the 60-day period is directory only and is not a limitation on its jurisdiction. Primarily it seeks dismissal of the petition on the contention that the petitioners have an adequate remedy which has not been exhausted.

*693Article 15 of the Executive Law delineates the way complaints to the respondent division shall be handled, how they shall be heard, to whom they shall be appealed and by which court the appeals shall be reviewed. When the respondent division determines that it has the jurisdiction to act, prohibition should not intrude into the statutory procedure. *(Matter of Richards*v. *Mangum,*35 A D 2d 124.)

In *Richards (supra),*the division determined that it had jurisdiction and set the matter for a hearing. In an article 78 proceeding the Special Term intervened with an order of prohibition. While it is true that on the appeal the jurisdiction of the division was conceded and the order therefore reversed, the court nonetheless expanded its holding beyond the limitation imposed by the concession. *“*In any event the judicial proceeding should not have been entertained. The statute (Executive Law, art. 15) envisions an administrative proceeding before the Division. A party dissatisfied with the determination of the Commissioner may appeal to the State Human Eights Appeal Board (Executive Law, § 297-a, subd. 6, par. c). Judicial review is available only from an order of the Appeal Board (Executive Law, § 298).” Additionally we point out that the statute is specific in its grant of authority to the Appeal Board to review the division’s determination of jurisdiction (Executive Law, § 297-a, subd. 7, par. b).

The petitioners’ motion must therefore be denied and the respondent’s cross motion granted.
32.2     Certification
of the Chief Financial Officer of Genesis Capital Corporation of Nevada pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Genesis Capital Corporation
of Nevada (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Christopher Astrom, Chief Financial Officer of Genesis Capital
Corporation of Nevada, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,


that:





(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Dated:
      August 14,  2008
              
              /s/ CHRISTOPHER
      ASTROMChristopher
      AstromChief
      Financial Officer
#### §§ 95.2371-95.2377 [Reserved]
- Untitled.pdf
- Untitled (005).pdf
No. 10-1411.

#### Doe, a Minor, By and Through His Guardian and Next Friend, Doe *v.*Todd County School District et al.

C. A. 8th Cir. Motion of South Dakota Advocacy Services et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae*granted. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Managed Pension Assets Partnership 1990-B, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of
operations  contained in its Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31, 1997 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         193,882
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  121,163
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               315,045
<PP&E>                                         4,060,603
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,332,818)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,042,830
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,930
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,037,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,042,830
<SALES>                                        436,637
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               440,973
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  158,180<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                220,955
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            220,955
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   220,955
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. FERNANDO REAL, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 515 EAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 21st day of January, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
#### § 87.195 121.5 MHz ELTs.

ELTs that operate only on frequency 121.5 MHz will no longer be certified. The manufacture, importation, and sale of ELTs that operate only on frequency 121.5 MHz is prohibited beginning July 10, 2019. Existing ELTs that operate only on frequency 121.5 MHz must be operated as certified.

[83 FR 63812, Dec. 12, 2018]
V

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5029

For the relief of Billy I. Meyer.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 12, 1994

Mr. LANTOS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Billy I. Meyer.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.

4 The time limitations set forth in subsections (b) and

5 (c) of section 3702 of title 31, United States Code, shall

6 not apply with respect to a claim by Billy I. Meyer, of

7 San Francisco, California, for pay due by the Department

8 of the Army, as represented by checks that were issued

9 to Billy I. Meyer during the period beginning on January

10 16, 1981, and ending on September 21, 1984, but were

11 not negotiated.
2

•HR 5029 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEADLINE.

2 Section 1 shall apply only if Billy I. Meyer, or his

3 authorized representative, submits a claim pursuant to

4 such section before the expiration of the 12-month period

5 beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### § 90.171 Scope.

This subpart contains detailed information concerning the policies under which the Commission assigns frequencies for the use of licensees under this part, frequency coordination procedures, and procedures under which licensees may cooperatively share radio facilities.