alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P132Using Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design in Problem Solving POP GuideCrime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) is an approach to problem solving that considers environmental conditions and the opportunities they offer for crime or other unintended and undesirable behaviors. CPTED attempts to reduce or eliminate those opportunities by using elements of the environment to (1) control access; (2) provide opportunities to see and be seen; and (3) define ownership and encourage the maintenance of territory. This guide is a resource for understanding and using crime prevention through environmental design as a problem-solving tool. The guide explains the basic principles of CPTED and outlines a process for identifying problems, evaluating the physical environment, and identifying strategies that will remove or reduce opportunities for crime.By Diane ZahmCategories: Data and Analysis • POP Center ResourceLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p132Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFPamphlet • Oct 2007Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 02:33 (UTC-5) in 0.19 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
§ 95.377 Tones and signals. Personal Radio Service stations that transmit voice emissions may also transmit audible or subaudible tones or other signals for the purpose of selective calling and/or receiver squelch activation. These tones and signals are ancillary to voice communications and are considered to be included within the voice emission types, e.g., A3E, F3E, and G3E. ( a ) Tones that are audible (having a frequency higher than 300 Hertz), must last no longer than 15 seconds at one time.
( b ) Tones that are subaudible (having a frequency of 300 Hertz or less), may be transmitted continuously during a communication session.
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5065

AN ACT

To amend the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development

Act to make technical corrections to certain provisions

relating to beginning farmers and ranchers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Beginning Farmer

5 Technical Corrections Act of 1994’’.

6 SEC. 2. LAND OWNERSHIP LIMITATION MADE INAPPLICA7 BLE TO OPERATING LOANS.

8 Section 343(a)(11) of the Consolidated Farm and

9 Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C. 1991(a)(11)) is amend10 ed by adding after and below the end the following:
2

•HR 5065 EH

1 ‘‘As used in subtitle B, the term ‘qualified beginning

2 farmer or rancher’ shall have the meaning given in

3 the preceding sentence without regard to subpara4 graph (F).’’.

5 SEC. 3. GRADUATION OF BORROWERS WITHOUT REGARD

6 TO YOUTH LOANS.

7 Section 319 of the Consolidated Farm and Rural De8 velopment Act (7 U.S.C. 1949) is amended by adding at

9 the end the following:

10 ‘‘(c) DISREGARD OF LOANS MADE TO YOUTHS.—As

11 used in this section, the term ‘loan’ does not include any

12 loan made under section 311(b).’’.

13 SEC. 4. DIRECT LOAN HISTORY AND GUARANTEE HISTORY

14 TO BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY IN APPLY15 ING THE TRANSITION RULE FOR GRADUA16 TION OF BORROWERS.

17 Section 319(b)(2) of the Consolidated Farm and

18 Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C. 1949(b)(2)) is amended

19 to read as follows:

20 ‘‘(2) TRANSITION RULES.—

21 ‘‘(A) CONSIDERATION OF DIRECT LOAN

22 HISTORY.—If, as of October 28, 1992, the Sec23 retary has, for 5 or more years, made a loan to

24 a borrower under this subtitle, then, after the

25 5th year (occurring after October 28, 1992) for
3

•HR 5065 EH

1 which a loan has been made to the borrower

2 under this subtitle, the Secretary shall not

3 make a loan to the borrower under this subtitle.

4 ‘‘(B) CONSIDERATION OF GUARANTEE HIS5 TORY.—If, as of October 28, 1992, the Sec6 retary has, for 10 or more years, provided a

7 guarantee under this subtitle with respect to a

8 loan made to a borrower, then, after the 5th

9 year (occurring after October 28, 1992) for

10 which a guarantee has been provided under this

11 subtitle with respect to a loan made to the bor12 rower, the Secretary shall not provide a guaran13 tee under this subtitle with respect to a loan

14 made to the borrower.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 29,

1994.

Attest:

Clerk.
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5065

AN ACT

To amend the Consolidated Farm and Rural Develranchers. tain provisions relating to beginning farmers and opment Act to make technical corrections to cer-
Exhibit 21

Subsidiaries of Del Monte Foods Company

Del Monte Corporation is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Del Monte Foods Company. The entities listed
below are direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries of Del Monte Corporation.



|                                                    |  |                              
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Subsidiaries                                        |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|Del Monte Argentina                                 |  | Argentina                    
|Hi Continental Corporation                          |  | California                   
|College Inn Foods (1)                               |  | California                   
|Star-Kist Samoa, Inc.                               |  | California                   
|DLM Foods Canada Corp.                              |  | Canada                       
|Del Monte Colombiana, S.A.                          |  | Colombia                     
|Contadina Foods, Inc.                               |  | Delaware                     
|Marine Trading Pacific, Inc.                        |  | Delaware                     
|The Meow Mix Company, LLC                           |  | Delaware                     
|Meow Mix Decatur Production I LLC                   |  | Delaware                     
|S&W Fine Foods, Inc.                                |  | Delaware                     
|Del Monte Ecuador DME C.A.                          |  | Ecuador                      
|Galapesca, S.A.                                     |  | Ecuador                      
|Panapesca Fishing, Inc.                             |  | Panama                       
|Star-Kist International, S.A.                       |  | Panama                       
|Del Monte Peru, S.A.C.                              |  | Peru                         
|Del Monte Andina, C.A.                              |  | Venezuela                    
|Industrias Citrícolas de Montemorelos, S.A. de C.V. |  | Mexico                       



|(1) | Formerly known as Oak Grove Trucking Company
|--- | --------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT
31.1 RULE
13a-14(a)/RULE 15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER I, Robert L. Caulk,
certify that: 1.I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2003, of United Industries Corporation; 2.Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report; 4.The
registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a)designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; (c)evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and (d)disclosed
in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5.The
registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a)all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and (b)any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. Dated: November 13, 2003
  
  By:
  
  /s/ Robert L.
  CaulkName:
  
  Robert L. CaulkTitle:
  
  President, Chief Executive Officer and
  Chairman of the Board


---
§ 54.1802 Affordable connectivity benefit. ( a ) The Affordable Connectivity Program will provide reimbursement to a participating provider for the monthly affordable connectivity benefit on the price of broadband internet access service (including associated equipment necessary to provide such service) it provides to an eligible household plus any amount the participating provider is entitled to receive for providing a connected device to such a household under § 54.1803(b).
( b ) A participating provider may allow an eligible household to apply the affordable connectivity benefit to any residential service plan selected by the eligible household that includes broadband internet access service or a bundle of broadband internet access service along with fixed or mobile voice telephony service, text messaging service, or both.
[87 FR 8373, Feb. 14, 2022, as amended at 87 FR 8382, Feb. 14, 2022]
**** **EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Interactive Intelligence, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dr.
      Donald E. Brown, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
      of
      the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      ss.
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The 
      information  contained  in the  Report  fairly 
presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.








/s/
      Donald E. Brown, M.D


Donald
      E.
      Brown, M.D.


President
      and Chief Executive Officer


August
      11, 2006
Summary of Stephen A. Grover 2007 Compensation.



 Exhibit 10.18 
 Summary of Stephen A. Grover 2007 Compensation 
 The Knoll, Inc. compensation committee approved an
annual base salary of $275,000 for Stephen A. Grover, with a bonus target of $275,000. Mr. Grover is also entitled to participate in the benefit plans provided by Knoll that are available to Knoll employees generally, including, without
limitation, healthcare benefits, the Knoll Retirement Savings Plan, the Knoll Pension Plan and the Knoll Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cigma Metals Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Antonio Jaramillo, President, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Antonio Jaramillo
Dated: November 13, 2012  By:
Antonio JaramilloTitle:
Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial Officer,

Principal Accounting Officer and Director)


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### WILLIAM M. ROOSA, Respondent, *v.*ISAAC E. SMITH and ERNEST L. SMITH, Appellants.

*Power of General Term to review evidence*— when *the finding of a referee will not he disturbed.*

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon the report of a referee.

The court at General Term, after referring to the evidence adduced by the respective parties, and showing that it was contradictory, said:

“ The referee has seen the parties and their witnesses and heard their testimony given before him *viva voce ;*he has estimated their frankness, honesty, intelligence, freedom from bias, and given credit or distrust as he thought in these respects-the witnesses deserved; he has passed judgment upon their personal - appearance, temper and manners while on the stand, and he has looked at all the reasonable probabilities suggested by his personal contact, so to speak, with the parties and witnesses and during their examination. From all this and more that is imperceptible and intangible upon appeal, the referee has made up his mind where the right and the truth lies, and given judgment accordingly. We are cited to *Godfrey*v. ' *139
      *Moser*(66 N. Y., 252) to show us this finding is not conclusive upon us. We have never supposed that a finding of a referee without evidence, or clearly against a preponderance of evidence, was binding upon the General Term. But we think it very clear that a General Term cannot in a doubtful case upon conflicting evidence, like the one under review, assume the place of the referee and determine from the mere reading of the evidence -who has told the truth, or is best entitled to credit. This would be imposing upon us a duty unsafe to exercise and dangerous in its ordinary use. It would make of a referee to try an issue simply a referee to report the testimony to this court, which in such cases would review nothing but the evidence, giving such a decision as in its judgment upon the evidence is just. We understand this court has the power to examine the evidence and the finding of facts in cases tried before a referee or the courts ; that it has the power, and it is its duty, to interfere when facts have been found without evidence or clearly against evidence ; but we do not understand it can be called on in doubtful cases upon conflicting evidence, depending upon the character and credibility of witnesses, to review and readjust the facts upon the evidence as it shall appear to it oh paper.”

*Nathaniel C.*Moak, for the appellants. *George IT. Carpenter,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

BoaudmaN, J.,

LeaeNed, P. J., and Bocees, J., concurred.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
32.2     Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of Genesis Capital
         Corporation of Nevada pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act
         of 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form  10-QSB/A of Genesis  Capital
Corporation  of Nevada (the  "Company")  for the quarter  ended June 30, 2006 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  the  undersigned  Christopher  Astrom,  Chief  Financial  Officer of
Genesis Capital Corporation of Nevada,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: September 21, 2006

                                      /s/ CHRISTOPHER ASTROM
                                      -----------------------
                                      Christopher Astrom
                                      Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6799

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

COLE MACHADO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief 

District Judge. (2:11-cr-00096-RBS-TEM-1)

Submitted: September 29, 2014 Decided: October 8, 2014

Before MOTZ, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cole Machado, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Marie Yusi, OFFICE OF 

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Cole Machado appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (2012) motion. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United 

States v. Machado, No. 2:11-cr-00096-RBS-TEM-1 (E.D. Va. May 1, 

2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jones Soda Co. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Hassan N. Natha, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |             
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ------------
|/s/ Hassan N. Natha     |  |  |  | May 15, 2006
|Hassan N. Natha         |  |  |  |             
|Chief Financial Officer |  |  |  |
Form of Letter Agreement



 Exhibit 10.15 
 KBL HEALTHCARE ACQUISITION CORP. III 
                     , 2007 
 KBL
Healthcare Management, Inc. 
 757 Third Avenue, 21st Floor 
 New York, New York 10017 
 Gentlemen: 
 This letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the effective date (“Effective Date”) of the registration statement for the initial public offering (“IPO”) of the securities of KBL Healthcare Acquisition Corp.
III (“KBL”) and continuing until the earlier of the consummation by KBL of its initial “Business Combination” (as described in KBL’s IPO prospectus) and the liquidation of KBL, KBL Healthcare Management, Inc. shall make
available to KBL certain office and secretarial services as may be required by KBL from time to time, situated at 757 Third Avenue, 21st Floor, New York, New York 10017. In exchange therefor, KBL shall pay KBL Healthcare Management, Inc. the sum of $10,000 per month on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter. 
  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	KBL HEALTHCARE ACQUISITION CORP. III
		
	By:	 	  
		 	 Name:
 Title:



  

			
	AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:
	
	KBL HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, INC.
		
	By:	 	  
		 	 Name:
 Title:
- GA 1976 94TH
- GA 1976
- GA 1976 94TH
No. 11-5696.

#### Smith *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.