alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Ryan K. Koffman

12289 Daisy Court

Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739-1921

April 20, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington DC 20590

Re: Application to Amend Section 333 Exemption No. 11314 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-0958

Dear Sir or Madam:

By letter dated April 9, 2015 from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) the request for exemption from 

Section 333 was granted. The letter is marked Section 333 Exemption No. 11314 Regulatory Docket No. FAA2014-0958.

The petitioner, Ryan K. Koffman, requests the granted exemption be amended to include an additional UAS 

type. The UAS requested is the DJI S900 and the Bade 350QX.

The reasoning for an additional UAS type was accidentally excluded in the original request for an amendment 

dated April 19, 2015.

I believe there is an increased layer of safety by implementing the DJI S900 and the Blade 350QX. Due to the 

decreased size of the UAS this would allow a smaller takeoff and landing area necessary for operation. The 

requested UAS may be used to obtain the proper camera position/angle for production filming. Once the 

UAS has acquired the necessary information with positive results the larger UAS may be utilized for the final 

filming production. 

The DJI S900 has a total weight of 8.2Kg or 18.1lbs. The dimensions are 900mm diagonally. The maximum 

speed is not listed in the aircrafts operating manual (AOM) but will not exceed 50mph. The S900 has six 

motors, Motor Model S900-021, powered by a 6-cell 10000mAh or 15000mAh Lithium Polymer battery. 

There are six propellers in use, Propeller Model DJI S900-25. The S900 will be controlled with the Spektrum 

DX8 remote controller with an operating frequency of 2.400GHz – 2.483GHz. The live video feed will have an 

operating frequency of 5.728GHz – 5.850GHz. 

The Blade 350QX has a total weight of 24oz or 680g. The dimensions are 18.30inch (465mm) in length and 

5.43inch (138mm) in height with a main rotor diameter of 22.80inch (580mm). The maximum speed is not 

listed in the AOM but will not exceed 50mph. The 350QX has four motors, Motor Model BLH7802, powered 

by a 3 cell 2200mAh or 3000mAh Lithium Polymer battery. There are four propellers, Propeller Model APC 

LP08038SF and LP08038SFP, in use. The 350QX will be controlled with the Spektrum DX8 remote controller 
U.S. Department of Transportation 

April 20, 2015

Page 2

with an operating frequency of 2.400GHZ – 2.4835GHz. The live video feed will have an operating frequency 

of 5.728GHz – 5.850GHz.

The Base Station that will be utilized is the Neewer 7inch LCD Diversity Receiver Monitor, Model RX-LCD5802. 

The operating frequency is between 5645MHz – 5945MHz. The Neewer monitor is powered by an integrated 

2 cell 2500mAh Lithium Polymer battery.

Thank you for your understanding and consideration. Please feel free to contact me if you have any 

questions regarding this request or need additional information.

Sincerely,

Ryan K. Koffman
EXHIBIT 31.2 

 

CERTIFICATION 

 

I, Jennifer L. Cue, certify that: 

 

1. I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Jones Soda Co. 

 

2. Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report. 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b. evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c. disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting. 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):

 

a. all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Dated as of November 9, 2005.
September 3, 2015

Mr. Gerald Kerr

9828 Whisperwood Lane

Brighton, MI 48116-8859

Dear Mr. Kerr:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your June 17, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-1618), 

but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not 

comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any 

further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 
2

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at

least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If

you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
3
EXHIBIT 32.1: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification
 
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of China Water Group, Inc. (the “Registrant”) certifies that:
 
 1.           The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant for the period ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 
 2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 
 Date:  June 17, 2011
/s/ Wenge Fang
 Wenge Fang, Chief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. SHAN WILLIAM MEHAFFIE, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 475 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 29th day of October, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
No. 11-5048.

#### Carroll *v.*Galaza, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 216.50 Importation at designated ports. ( a ) Any marine mammal or marine mammal product which is subject to the jurisdiction of the National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Department of Commerce and is intended for importation into the United States shall be subject to the provisions of 50 CFR part 14.
( b ) For the information of importers, designated ports of entry for the United States are: New York, N.Y. Miami, Fla. Chicago, Ill. San Francisco, Calif. Los Angeles, Calif. New Orleans, La. Seattle, Wash. Honolulu, Hi.
( c ) Additionally, marine mammals or marine mammal products which are entered into Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa or the Virgin Islands and which are not to be forwarded or transhipped within the United States may be imported through the following ports: Alaska—Juneau, Anchorage, Fairbanks Hawaii—Honolulu Puerto Rico—San Juan Guam—Honolulu, Hi. American Samoa—Honolulu, Hi. Virgin Islands—San Juan, P.R.
( d ) Importers are advised to see 50 CFR part 14 for importation requirements and information.
[39 FR 1852, Jan. 15, 1974. Redesignated at 59 FR 50376, Oct. 3, 1994]
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

In re: 

Lonnie Maurice Hayes

Debtor(s)

Case No. 16 B 23308

CHAPTER 13 STANDING TRUSTEE’S FINAL REPORT AND ACCOUNT

Marilyn O. Marshall, chapter 13 trustee, submits the following Final Report and Account 

of the administration of the estate pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1302(b)(1). The trustee declares as 

follows:

1) The case was filed on 07/20/2016.

2) The plan was confirmed on NA .

3) The plan was modified by order after confirmation pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1329 on

NA .

4) The trustee filed action to remedy default by the debtor in performance under the plan 

on NA .

5) The case was Dismissed on 08/24/2016.

6) Number of months from filing to last payment: 0.

7) Number of months case was pending: 3.

8) Total value of assets abandoned by court order: NA .

9) Total value of assets exempted: NA .

10) Amount of unsecured claims discharged without payment: $0.00.

11) All checks distributed by the trustee relating to this case have cleared the bank.

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (9/1/2009)

Case 16-23308 Doc 14 Filed 10/24/16 Entered 10/24/16 16:02:23 Desc Page 1

 of 3
Receipts:

Total paid by or on behalf of the debtor $0.00

Less amount refunded to debtor $0.00

NET RECEIPTS: $0.00

Expenses of Administration:

Attorney’s Fees Paid Through the Plan $0.00

Court Costs $0.00

Trustee Expenses & Compensation $0.00

Other $0.00

TOTAL EXPENSES OF ADMINISTRATION: $0.00

Attorney fees paid and disclosed by debtor: $0.00

Scheduled Creditors:

Creditor

Name Class

Claim

Scheduled

Claim

Asserted

Claim

Allowed

Int.

Paid

Principal

Paid

Summary of Disbursements to Creditors:

Secured Payments:

Mortgage Ongoing

Mortgage Arrearage

Debt Secured by Vehicle

All Other Secured

TOTAL SECURED:

Priority Unsecured Payments:

Domestic Support Arrearage

Domestic Support Ongoing

All Other Priority

TOTAL PRIORITY:

GENERAL UNSECURED PAYMENTS:

Claim

Allowed

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Principal

Paid

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Interest

Paid

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (9/1/2009)

Case 16-23308 Doc 14 Filed 10/24/16 Entered 10/24/16 16:02:23 Desc Page 2

 of 3
Disbursements:

Expenses of Administration $0.00

Disbursements to Creditors $0.00

TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS : $0.00

12) The trustee certifies that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 5009, 

the estate has been fully administered, the foregoing summary is true and complete, and all 

administrative matters for which the trustee is responsible have been completed. The trustee 

requests a final decree be entered that discharges the trustee and grants such other relief as may 

be just and proper.

Dated: 10/24/2016

STATEMENT: This Unified Form is associated with an open bankruptcy case, therefore, Paperwork Reduction 

Act exemption 5 C.F.R. § 1320.4(a)(2) applies.

By:/s/ Marilyn O. Marshall

Trustee

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (9/1/2009)

Case 16-23308 Doc 14 Filed 10/24/16 Entered 10/24/16 16:02:23 Desc Page 3

 of 3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces its intent to hold proposal review meetings throughout the year. The purpose of these meetings is to provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to the NSF for financial support. The agenda for each of these meetings is to review and evaluate proposals as part of the selection process for awards. The review and evaluation may also include assessment of the progress of awarded proposals. The majority of these meetings will take place at NSF, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, Virginia 22230.

These meetings will be closed to the public. The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act. NSF will continue to review the agenda and merits of each meeting for overall compliance of the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

                    These closed proposal review meetings will not announced on an individual basis in the                     **Federal Register**                    . NSF intends to publish a notice similar to this on a quarterly basis. For an advance listing of the closed proposal review meetings that include the names of the proposal review panel and the time, date, place, and any information on changes, corrections, or cancellations, please visit the NSF Web site at:                     *http://www.nsf.gov*. This information may also be requested by telephoning, 703/292-8182.                

Dated: September 15, 2006.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 06-7778 Filed 9-19-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Source Direct Holdings, Inc. (the Company) as amended on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Dated:  June 21, 2007

/s/ Deren Z. Smith

Name: Deren Z. Smith

Title:  Chief Executive Officer



Dated:  June 21, 2007

/s/ Kevin Arave

Name: Kevin Arave

Title:  Chief Financial Officer
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Law enforcement management andadministrative statistics: data for individual state and local agencies with100 or more officers.**
 
SuDoc Number:J 29.32:

Item Number:0717-R-10 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000531751
 
1990 | 1993| 1997 | 1999 | 2000
 
April 14, 2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,950,893
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,038,833
<ALLOWANCES>                                   309,601
<INVENTORY>                                     52,001
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,428,028
<PP&E>                                       1,660,780
<DEPRECIATION>                                 894,271
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,299,985
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,139,607
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    333,969
<COMMON>                                       108,035
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,633,882
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,299,985
<SALES>                                     14,058,316
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,058,316
<CGS>                                        6,266,025
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,266,025
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,587,077
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              54,823
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (332,675)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (332,675)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (521,464)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (854,139)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)


</TABLE>
§ 18.91 Director's decision. ( a ) Upon receipt of the recommended decision and transcript and after the thirty-day period for receiving written comments on the recommended decision has passed, the Director shall make a final decision on the proposed regulations and waiver, where applicable. The Director's decision may affirm, modify, or set aside, in whole or in part, the recommended findings, conclusions and decision of the presiding officer. The Director may also remand the hearing record to the presiding officer for a fuller development of the record.
( b ) The Director's decision shall include: ( 1 ) A statement containing a description of the history of the proceeding;
( 2 ) Findings on the issues of fact with the reasons therefor;
( 3 ) Rulings on issues of law; and
( 4 ) Any other relevant information which the Director deems appropriate.
( c ) The Director's decision shall be published in the Federal Register. If the waiver is approved, the final adopted regulations shall be promulgated with the decision, or as soon thereafter as practicable.
§ 76.916 Petition for recertification. ( a ) After its request for certification has been denied or its existing certification has been revoked, a franchising authority wishing to assume jurisdiction to regulate basic service and associated equipment rates must file a “Petition for Recertification” accompanied by a copy of the earlier decision denying or revoking certification.
( b ) The petition must: ( 1 ) Meet the requirements set forth in 47 U.S.C. 543(a)(3);
( 2 ) State that the cable system is not subject to effective competition; and
( 3 ) Contain a clear showing, supported by either objectively verifiable data such as a state statute, or by affidavit, that the reasons for the earlier denial or revocation no longer pertain.
( c ) The petition must be served on the cable operator and on any interested party that participated in the proceeding denying or revoking the original certification.
( d ) Oppositions may be filed within 15 days after the petition is filed, and must be served on the petitioner. Replies may be filed within seven days of filing of oppositions, and must be served on the opposing party(ies).
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5099 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5099

To amend the Reclamation States Emergency Drought Relief Act of 1991 to 
        provide a loan to the Madera-Chowchilla Power Authority.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 26, 1994

  Mr. Lehman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Reclamation States Emergency Drought Relief Act of 1991 to 
        provide a loan to the Madera-Chowchilla Power Authority.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DROUGHT RELIEF FOR MADERA-CHOWCHILLA POWER AUTHORITY 
              HYDROELECTRIC PROJECTS.

    Section 103 of the Reclamation States Emergency Drought Relief Act 
of 1991 (106 Stat. 55; 43 U.S.C. 2213) is amended--
            (1) by inserting in the first sentence after ``resulting 
        from drought conditions.'' the following: ``The Secretary is 
        further authorized to make a loan to the Madera-Chowchilla 
        Power Authority to assist in the repayment of financial 
        obligations associated with hydroelectric facilities that have 
        been adversely affected by drought conditions.''; and
            (2) by striking ``loan.'' at the end of the second proviso 
        and inserting ``loan, except that loans specifically for the 
        Madera-Chowchilla Power Authority associated with hydroelectric 
        facilities impacted by drought shall be under such terms and 
        conditions as the Secretary deems appropriate.''.
                                 <all>
```