alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT  23


The Board of Directors
CE Software Holdings, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No's 33-54210 and 33-41037) on Form S-8 of CE Software Holdings, Inc. of
our report dated October 29, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance
sheets of CE Software Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 1999
and 1998, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
September 30, 1999, which report appears in the September 30, 1999 Form 10-KSB
of CE Software Holdings, Inc.



                                                /s/ KPMG LLP

                                                    KPMG LLP

Des Moines, Iowa
December 28, 1999


Page 41

<PAGE>
§ 90.757 Construction requirements. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, a Phase I non-nationwide licensee that is granted modification of its authorization to relocate its base station must construct its base station and place it in operation, or commence service, on all authorized channels on or before August 15, 1996, or within 12 months of initial grant date, whichever is later. The authorization of a licensee that does not construct its base station and place it in operation, or commence service, by this date, cancels automatically and must be returned to the Commission.
( b ) A Phase I non-nationwide licensee with a base station authorized at a location north of Line A must construct its base station and place it in operation, or commence service, on all authorized channels within 12 months of initial grant date, or within 12 months of the date of the release of the terms of an agreement between the United States and Canadian governments on the sharing of 220-222 MHz spectrum between the two countries, whichever is later. The authorization of a licensee that does not construct its base station and place it in operation, or commence service, by this date, cancels automatically and must be returned to the Commission.
[61 FR 3845, Feb. 2, 1996]
§ 96.47 End user device additional requirements. ( a ) End User Devices may operate only if they can positively receive and decode an authorization signal transmitted by a CBSD, including the frequencies and power limits for their operation. ( 1 ) An End User Device must discontinue operations, change frequencies, or change its operational power level within 10 seconds of receiving instructions from its associated CBSD.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( b ) Any device operated at higher power than specified for End User Devices in § 96.41 will be classified as, and subject to, the operational requirements of a CBSD.
#### § 80.659 Technical requirements.

The authorized frequency tolerance, class of emission, bandwidth, and transmitter power for maritime support stations are contained in subpart E of this part under the category associated with the intended use except for power limitations imposed upon stations operating within the scope of § 80.653(b)(3), which are further limited by the provisions of § 80.215(f).
§ 80.101 Radiotelephone testing procedures. This section is applicable to all stations using telephony except where otherwise specified. ( a ) Station licensees must not cause harmful interference. When radiation is necessary or unavoidable, the testing procedure described below must be followed: ( 1 ) The operator must not interfere with transmissions in progress.
( 2 ) The testing station's call sign, followed by the word “test”, must be announced on the radio-channel being used for the test.
( 3 ) If any station responds “wait”, the test must be suspended for a minimum of 30 seconds, then repeat the call sign followed by the word “test” and listen again for a response. To continue the test, the operator must use counts or phrases which do not conflict with normal operating signals, and must end with the station's call sign. Test signals must not exceed ten seconds, and must not be repeated until at least one minute has elapsed. On the frequency 2182 kHz or 156.800 MHz, the time between tests must be a minimum of five minutes.
( b ) Testing of transmitters must be confined to single frequency channels on working frequencies. However, 2182 kHz and 156.800 MHz may be used to contact ship or coast stations as appropriate when signal reports are necessary. Short tests on 4125 kHz are permitted by vessels equipped with MF/HF radios to evaluate the compatibility of the equipment for distress and safety purposes. U.S. Coast Guard stations may be contacted on 2182 kHz or 156.800 MHz for test purposes only when tests are being conducted by Commission employees, when FCC-licensed technicians are conducting inspections on behalf of the Commission, when qualified technicians are installing or repairing radiotelephone equipment, or when qualified ship's personnel conduct an operational check requested by the U.S. Coast Guard. In these cases the test must be identified as “FCC” or “technical.”
( c ) Survival craft transmitter tests must not be made within actuating range of automatic alarm receivers.
[51 FR 31213, Sept. 2, 1986, as amended at 63 FR 29659, June 1, 1998; 68 FR 46961, Aug. 7, 2003]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     UNAUDITED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  FOR THE PERIOD  ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 THAT
     WERE WERE FILED WITH THE  COMPANY'S  REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED
     IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>         0001083383
<NAME>        Genesis Capital Corporation of Nevada
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1
<CURRENCY>                                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                OCT-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             1,755,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       392,700
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    78
<COMMON>                                     2,218
<OTHER-SE>                                 1,360,004
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               1,755,000
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              45
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (45)
<INCOME-TAX>                                27,539
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         27,494
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                27,494
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.013)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0.009


</TABLE>
287A15

#### State v. Warith Farad Muhammad

1. Defs Notice of Appeal Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA14-1350)

1.-

2. State’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal

2. Allowed
- OH 1971
Exhibit 31.2

Certifications

I, David P. Jones, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 of Team Health Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



By:

/S/    DAVID P.
JONESDavid P. Jones Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Date:
November 9, 2010
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Lawrence H. Hayward, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Leslies Poolmart, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 27, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Leslies Poolmart, Inc.



By:

/s/    LAWRENCE H. HAYWARDName:

Lawrence H. HaywardTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer




I, Donald J. Anderson, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Leslies Poolmart, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 27, 2003 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Leslies Poolmart, Inc.



By:

/s/    DONALD J. ANDERSONName:

Donald J. AndersonTitle:

Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer
[No. 2112.]

#### T. A. Williams *v.*The State.

Theft—Information — Ownership.— The complaint cannot be looked to, in order to supply the omission of an essential averment in the information. The information must be sufficient of itself, and if upon its face it is substantially defective, such defect cannot be obviated by extraneous matter. In omitting to allege the ownership of the property charged to be stolen, the information in this case was fatally deficient.

Appeal from the County Court of Bains. Tried below before the Hon. E, P. Kearby, County Judge.

The opinion sets out the charging part of the information, which discloses the case. The punishment assessed against the appellant was a fine of $50 and confinement in the county jail for the period of twenty-four hours.

*F. E. Scott*and *T. O. Thornton,*for the appellant.

*J. N. Burts,*Assistant Attorney- General, for the State.

Willson, Judge.

The charging part of the information is as follows: “ That T. A. Williams did, in the county of Bains, and State of Texas, on or about the 14th day of December, A. D. 1884, fraudulently take, steal and carry away seven hundred and thirty feet of lumber of the value of $7.30; said lumber was taken from the pos*410session of J. F. Stivers, and was obtained from said Stivers by fraudulent representations made by the said Williams, to the effect that the said Williams was authorized to get said lumber for the Brooklin School Community, and that said lumber was then and there the property of M. A. Vincent, A. B. Abercrombie and W. 11. Beeves, as trustees of said Brooklin School Community; and that said lumber was so fraudulently taken without the consent of the owner, with intent to deprive the owner of the value of the said lumber and to appropriate it to the use and benefit of him, the said T. A. Williams.”

It will be observed that the information does not allege who was the owner of the lumber. It is alleged that it was taken from the possession of Stivers, but it is not alleged that Stivers was the owner. Bor is it alleged that the Brooklin School Community, or the trustees of said community, owned the lumber. If we were permitted to refer to the complaint in aid of the information, we could hold the information in respect to the allegation of ownership to be sufficient, because in the complaint it is directly stated that the lumber was the property of M. A. Vincent, A. B. Abercrombie and W. M. Beeves, as trustees of said Brooklin School Community. But we cannot look to the complaint to supply the omission of an essential averment in the information. An information must be sufficient of itself, and if upon its face it is substantially defective, such defect cannot be obviated by extraneous matter.

Because the information fails to allege the ownership of the lumber, it is substantially defective, and the judgment is therefore reversed and the prosecution is dismissed.

*Reversed and dismissed.*

[Opinion delivered November 21, 1885.]
# New Mexico Snow Survey

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  New Mexico Snow Survey 

NRCS's Snow Survey and Water Forecasting program monitors seasonal snowpack and annual mountain precipitation and uses the data collected to provide streamflow forecasts. These forecasts help water managers make informed management decisions and curtail water supply issues before they occur.

NRCS's Snow Survey and Water Supply Forecasting program monitors seasonal snowpack and annual mountain precipitation and uses the data collected to provide streamflow forecasts. These forecasts help water managers make informed management decisions and curtail water supply issues before they occur. The data collected by the program are also used by recreationists, climate and snow researchers, and reservoir operators.

In New Mexico there are 29 Active Snow Telemetry sites. These are automated data collection sites which collect real time snow, precipitation, air temperature and soil moisture information and transmit these data by satellite. In addition, several manual snow surveys are conducted each winter month throughout the state These manual snow courses require staff to physically travel to each site to collect data. Data collection occurs typically each month from December to May. 

----

Snow Survey and Water Supply Forecasting, New Mexico NRCS

----

##   New Mexico Interactive Graphs

New Mexico Interactive Basin Plots
Interactive Graphs for New Mexico Basins

New Mexico Interactive Station Plots
Interactive Graphs for New Mexico Stations

##   Explore New Mexico in the Interactive Map

Explore New Mexico in the Interactive Map
The Interactive Map Conditions Interface allows users to display current and historical snow water equivalent, snow depth, precipitation, reservoir storage, and streamflow data collected by the Natural Resources Conservation ...

----

##   New Mexico Water Supply Outlook Reports

New Mexico Water Supply Outlook Reports
The New Mexico NRCS Snow Survey and Water Supply Forecasting Program publishes Water Supply Outlook Reports monthly from January through May.

### Jaz Ammon

                      -    505-328-8629 
                      -    jaz.ammon@usda.gov 

### Richard (Rick) Strait

                      -    505-761-4433 
                      -    richard.strait@usda.gov
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# ACTION:

New Meeting Date. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the rescheduled date of the first meeting of the American Health Information Community Confidentiality and Security Workgroup in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.). The Confidentiality and Security Workgroup was created by the American Health Information Community as a cross-cutting Workgroup comprised of privacy, security, clinical, and technical experts, as well as representation from the consumer perspective.

*New Date Time:*                         August 21, 2006, 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. This meeting was previously scheduled to be held on August 4, 2006.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW, Washington, DC 20201), Conference Room 4090.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

*http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​workgroups.html*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The meeting will be available via Web cast at                     *http://www.eventcenterlive.com/​cfmx/​ec/​login/​login1.cfm?​BID=​67*.                

Dated: August 3, 2006.

Judith Sparrow,

Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.

[FR Doc. 06-6916  Filed 8-14-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Ding Rencai,certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of China Water Group, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c.

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; 

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: September 29, 2015

/s/ Ding Rencai

     Ding Rencai

     Chief Financial Officer
No. 11-209.

#### Bhama *v.*Mercy Memorial Hospital Corp.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EX-32

          SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF GARY BORGLUND

                    SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the quarterly report of Avery Sports Turf,
Inc. ("Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.


Dated: August 18, 2004                 /s/  Gary Borglund
                                       Gary Borglund, President