alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 16-25762 Doc 6 Filed 08/11/16 Entered 08/11/16 09:54:12 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-25762 Doc 6 Filed 08/11/16 Entered 08/11/16 09:54:12 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4986 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4986

      To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the 
deductibility of business meal expenses for individuals who are subject 
                    to Federal hours of limitation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 18, 1994

Mr. Jefferson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the 
deductibility of business meal expenses for individuals who are subject 
                    to Federal hours of limitation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASED DEDUCTIBILITY OF BUSINESS MEAL EXPENSES FOR 
              INDIVIDUALS SUBJECT TO FEDERAL HOURS OF SERVICE.

    (a) In General.--Section 274(n) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (relating to only 50 percent of meal and entertainment expenses 
allowed as deduction) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(3) Special rule for individuals subject to federal hours 
        of service.--In the case of any expenses for food or beverages 
        consumed by an individual during, or incident to, the period of 
        duty subject to the hours of service limitations of the 
        Department of Transportation, paragraph (1) shall be applied by 
        substituting `80 percent' for `50 percent'.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1994.
                                 <all>
```
#### EAST RIDGELAWN CEMETERY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

See same case below: 11 *N. J. Super.*555.

*Mr. Theodore D. Parsons*for the petitioner.

February 4, 1952.

Denied.
#### § 95.769 [Reserved]
No. 11-5923.

#### Rodriguez-Perez *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
OHV

Passes & Fees Schedule 

SVRA entrance stations will only accept cash or checks; ATM or credit cards a

accepted at this time. 

SVRAs

* OHV Vehicle Day Use Annual Passes may be purchased online at the Califo

Parks Store. 

** See OHV Nonresident Use Permit Vendor list for purchasing information. N

Use Permits go on sale in October and are valid for the following year. To plac

by mail, download a copy of the OHV Permit Order Form form. 

Note: OHV Vehicle Day Use Annual Passes will only be honored at OHV Park

not be valid at any other type of State Park. Lost or stolen passes cannot be re

no refunds can be issued. 

SVRA Camping

OHV Vehicle Day Use Annual Pass * $50/calendar yea

Day Use Parking Fee $5/day

Nonresident OHV Use Permit ** $30/calendar yea

Carnegie SVRA $10/night

Clay Pit SVRA No Camping

Passes & Fees Schedule Page 1 of 2

http://ohv.parks.ca.gov/?page_id=25760 2/8/2010
*** To reserve your camp site at Oceano Dunes SVRA, please use the Reserv

website. Reservations are highly recommended and can be made up to 7 mon

advance. Note: reservations must be made at least 2 days in advance of the a

When requesting a camp site for Oceano Dunes, do not use the word "Pismo" 

access information about Pismo State Beach-Northbeach and Oceano Campg

The remaining SVRA camp sites are available on a first-come, first-serve basis

OHV Green & Red Identification Stickers

* All OHVs have a fixed expiration date of June 30. For more information, pleas

DMV OHV Vehicle Registration & Title Information web page. For additional in

regarding Green & Red Sticker fee increase, please download the OHMVR Inf

Bulletin dated April 24, 2009. 

SNO-PARKS

See SNO-PARK Vendor list for purchasing information. To place an order by m

download a copy of the OHV Permit Order Form form. 

Heber Dunes SVRA No Camping

Hollister Hills SVRA $10/night

Hungry Valley SVRA $10/night

Oceano Dunes SVRA *** $10/night

Ocotillo Wells SVRA Free

Prairie City SVRA No Camping

OHV Green & Red Identification Stickers $52 (for 2-years) 

Seasonal Pass (November 1 - May 30) $25/year

Day Use Pass $5/day

Conditions of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2009 State of California 

Passes & Fees Schedule Page 2 of 2

http://ohv.parks.ca.gov/?page_id=25760 2/8/2010
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Wenge Fang,certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of China Water Group, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c.

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; 

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: September 29, 2015

/s/ Wenge Fang

     Wenge Fang

     Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of NetFabric Holdings, Inc. (the” Company”)
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Fahad Syed
      Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C.


Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




August 17,
      2007




/s/ Fahad
                SyedName:
                Fahad SyedTitle:
                Chairman and Chief Executive
                Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      NetFabric Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by NetFabric Holdings, Inc. and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
#### § 95.2571 MedRadio emission types.

A MedRadio station may transmit any emission type appropriate for communications in this service. Voice communications, however, are prohibited.
§ 73.4050 Children's TV programs. ( a ) See Report and Policy Statement, Docket 19142, FCC 74-1174, adopted October 24, 1974. 50 FCC 2d 1; 39 FR 39396, November 6, 1974.
( b ) See Report and Order; Policy Statement, Docket 19142, FCC 83-609, adopted December 22, 1983. 96 FCC 2d 634; 49 FR 1704, January 13, 1984.
( c ) See Report and Order, MM Dockets 90-570 and 83-670, FCC 91-113, adopted April 9, 1991. 6 FCC Rcd 2111; 56 FR 19611, April 19, 1991; Memorandum Opinion and Order, MM Dockets 90-570 and 83-670, FCC 91-248, adopted August 1, 1991. 6 FCC Rcd 5093; 56 FR 42707, August 29, 1991.
[49 FR 14509, Apr. 12, 1984, as amended at 59 FR 52086, Oct. 14, 1994]
###### Editorial Note on Part 74

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 74 appear at 64 FR 4055, Jan. 27, 1999.

#### §§ 74.706-74.708 [Reserved]
II

Calendar No. 706

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5123

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 30 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Received; read twice and ordered to be placed on the calendar

AN ACT

To make a technical correction to an Act preempting State

economic regulation of motor carriers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Intrastate Tow and

5 Wrecker Truck Transportation Technical Correction Act

6 of 1994’’.

7 SEC. 2. TECHNICAL CORRECTION.

8 Section 11501(h)(2) of title 49, United States Code,

9 is amended as follows:

10 (1) Strike ‘‘and’’ after subparagraph (A).
2

HR 5123 PCS

1 (2) Strike the period at the end of subpara2 graph (B) and insert in lieu thereof ‘‘; and’’.

3 (3) Insert the following new subparagraph at

4 the end thereof:

5 ‘‘(C) does not restrict the regulatory au6 thority of an agency with statewide jurisdiction,

7 insofar as such authority relates to tow trucks

8 or wreckers providing for-hire services.’’.

9 SEC. 3. EXPIRATION.

10 The amendment made by section 2 shall cease to be

11 in effect on January 1, 1997.

Passed the House of Representatives September 29,

1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5123

AN ACT

To make a technical correction to an Act preempting State economic regulation of motor carriers.
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent
  required by 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Financial
  Officer of Jupiter Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) that, to his
  knowledge:

1. the periodic report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for
      the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934, and
2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.

|Date: February 24, 2004 | By: | /s/ Alexander Chen                     
|----------------------- | --- | ---------------------------------------
|                        |     |                                        
|                        |     | Alexander Chen, Chief Financial Officer

---
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-07-330-CV

COLUMBIA MEDICAL CENTER OF 					      APPELLANTS

ARLINGTON, SUBSIDIARY, L.P., D/B/A 

MEDICAL CENTER OF ARLINGTON, 

AND JANE DOE NURSE	

	V.

ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE	INSURANCE				APPELLEES

COMPANY AND STEVEN SZLOBODA	

	----------

	FROM THE 236TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered the “Joint Motion To Dismiss Appeal.”  It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2), 43.2(f).

	Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:  DAUPHINOT, HOLMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: January 31, 2008
No. 11-5665.

#### Pulido *v.*Hedgpeth, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### §§ 95.1793-95.1899 [Reserved]
§ 13.27 Permit suspension. ( a ) *Criteria for suspension.* The privileges of exercising some or all of the permit authority may be suspended at any time if the permittee is not in compliance with the conditions of the permit, or with any applicable laws or regulations governing the conduct of the permitted activity. The issuing officer may also suspend all or part of the privileges authorized by a permit if the permittee fails to pay any fees, penalties or costs owed to the Government. Such suspension shall remain in effect until the issuing officer determines that the permittee has corrected the deficiencies.
( b ) *Procedure for suspension.* ( 1 ) When the issuing officer believes there are valid grounds for suspending a permit the permittee shall be notified in writing of the proposed suspension by certified or registered mail. This notice shall identify the permit to be suspended, the reason(s) for such suspension, the actions necessary to correct the deficiencies, and inform the permittee of the right to object to the proposed suspension. The issuing officer may amend any notice of suspension at any time.
( 2 ) Upon receipt of a notice of proposed suspension the permittee may file a written objection to the proposed action. Such objection must be in writing, must be filed within 45 calendar days of the date of the notice of proposal, must state the reasons why the permittee objects to the proposed suspension, and may include supporting documentation.
( 3 ) A decision on the suspension shall be made within 45 days after the end of the objection period. The issuing officer shall notify the permittee in writing of the Service's decision and the reasons therefore. The issuing officer shall also provide the applicant with the information concerning the right to request reconsideration of the decision under § 13.29 of this part and the procedures for requesting reconsideration.
[54 FR 38149, Sept. 14, 1989]
No. 11-5757.

#### Zied-Campbell et vir *v.*Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare.

Commw. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.
Original,

No. 4588.

#### Barnard’s Case.

Argued May 8, 1957.

Decided May 8, 1957.

*34
      *J. Leonard Sweeney, pro se*and *Louis C. Wyman,*Attorney General *{Mr. Sweeney*and *Mr. Wyman*orally), for the petitioner.

*Sheehan, Phinney, Bass, Green & Bergevin {Mr. Bergevin*orally), for the respondent.

Kenison, C. J.

This court has the inherent power to take reasonable and expeditious action in the suspension or removal of members of the bar for the protection of the community. *Harrington’s Case,*100 N. H. 243, 244; *Ricker’s Petition,*66 N. H. 207, 211. In the exercise of this power this court has the obligation to make appropriate disciplinary orders “for the protection of the public, as well as for the maintenance of public confidence in the bar as a whole.” *Welanko’s Case,*99 N. H. 413, 414.

Although the respondent is presumed innocent until he has been proved guilty of the criminal charges pending against him, his right to continue the practice of law in the interim is not in the public interest. *Delano’s Case,*58 N. H. 5, 6; *Moore’s Case,*98 N. H. 324, 327; anno. 76 A. L. R. 674. While the respondent indicates that he will not practice law during that time, the public is entitled to an order that he shall not. Accordingly, the respondent is immediately and indefinitely suspended from the practice of law pending further order of this court and the prayer of the petition for disbarment (RSA 311:8) will be held in abeyance pending final adjudication of the criminal charges against him.

*So ordered.*

All concurred.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4846 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4846

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the unearned 
income of children attributable to personal injury awards shall not be 
               taxed at the marginal rate of the parents.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 28, 1994

 Mr. Boehlert introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the unearned 
income of children attributable to personal injury awards shall not be 
               taxed at the marginal rate of the parents.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TAX TREATMENT OF UNEARNED INCOME OF CHILDREN ATTRIBUTABLE TO 
              PERSONAL INJURY AWARDS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (4) of section 1(g) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to taxation of unearned income of minor 
children at parent's rate) is amended by redesignating subparagraph (B) 
as subparagraph (C) and by inserting after subparagraph (A) the 
following new subparagraph:
                    ``(B) Exception for unearned income attributable to 
                personal injury awards.--There shall not be taken into 
                account under subparagraph (A)(i) any income 
                attributable to an amount excluded from the gross 
                income of the child by reason of section 104(a)(2).''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 69.711 Channel terminations between LEC end offices and customer premises. ( a ) *Scope.* This paragraph governs requests for pricing flexibility with respect to channel terminations between LEC end offices and customer premises.
( b ) *Phase I triggers.* To obtain Phase I pricing flexibility, as specified in § 69.727(a) of this part, for channel terminations between LEC end offices and customer premises, a price cap LEC must show that, in the relevant area as described in § 69.707 of this part, competitors unaffiliated with the price cap LEC have collocated: ( 1 ) In 50 percent of the petitioner's wire centers, and that at least one such collocator in each wire center is using transport facilities owned by a transport provider other than the price cap LEC to transport traffic from that wire center; or
( 2 ) In wire centers accounting for 65 percent of the petitioner's revenues from channel terminations between LEC end offices and customer premises, determined as specified in § 69.725 of this part, and that at least one such collocator in each wire center is using transport facilities owned by a transport provider other than the price cap LEC to transport traffic from that wire center.
( c ) *Phase II triggers.* To obtain Phase II pricing flexibility, as specified in § 69.727(b) of this part, for channel terminations between LEC end offices and customer premises, a price cap LEC must show that, in the relevant area as described in § 69.707, competitors unaffiliated with the price cap LEC have collocated: ( 1 ) In 65 percent of the petitioner's wire centers, and that at least one such collocator in each wire center is using transport facilities owned by a transport provider other than the price cap LEC to transport traffic from that wire center; or
( 2 ) In wire centers accounting for 85 percent of the petitioner's revenues from channel terminations between LEC end offices and customer premises, determined as specified in § 69.725, and that at least one such collocator in each wire center is using transport facilities owned by a transport provider other than the price cap LEC to transport traffic from that wire center.