alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 218.37 Renewals and modifications of Letters of Authorization. ( a ) An LOA issued under §§ 216.106 of this chapter and 218.36 for the activity identified in § 218.30(a) shall be renewed or modified upon request by the applicant, provided that: ( 1 ) The proposed specified activity and mitigation, monitoring, and reporting measures, as well as the anticipated impacts, are the same as those described and analyzed for these regulations (excluding changes made pursuant to the adaptive management provision in paragraph (c)(1) of this section), and
( 2 ) NMFS determines that the mitigation, monitoring, and reporting measures required by the previous LOA under these regulations were implemented.
( b ) For LOA modification or renewal requests by the applicant that include changes to the activity or the mitigation, monitoring, or reporting (excluding changes made pursuant to the adaptive management provision in paragraph (c)(1) of this section) that do not change the findings made for the regulations or result in no more than a minor change in the total estimated number of takes (or distribution by species or years), NMFS may publish a notice of proposed LOA in the Federal Register, including the associated analysis of the change, and solicit public comment before issuing the LOA.
( c ) An LOA issued under §§ 216.106 of this chapter and 218.36 for the activity identified in § 218.30(a) may be modified by NMFS under the following circumstances: ( 1 ) *Adaptive management* —NMFS may modify (including augment) the existing mitigation, monitoring, or reporting measures (after consulting with the Navy regarding the practicability of the modifications) if doing so creates a reasonable likelihood of more effectively accomplishing the goals of the mitigation and monitoring set forth in the preamble for these regulations. ( i ) Possible sources of data that could contribute to the decision to modify the mitigation, monitoring, or reporting measures in an LOA: ( A ) Results from the Navy's monitoring from the previous year(s).
( B ) Results from other marine mammal and/or sound research or studies.
( C ) Any information that reveals marine mammals may have been taken in a manner, extent or number not authorized by these regulations or subsequent LOAs.
( ii ) If, through adaptive management, the modifications to the mitigation, monitoring, or reporting measures are substantial, NMFS will publish a notice of proposed LOA in the Federal Register and solicit public comment.
( 2 ) *Emergencies.* If NMFS determines that an emergency exists that poses a significant risk to the well-being of the species or stocks of marine mammals specified in LOAs issued pursuant to §§ 216.106 of this chapter and 218.36, an LOA may be modified without prior notice or opportunity for public comment. Notice would be published in the Federal Register within thirty days of the action.
No. 11-9586.

#### Davis *v.*Indiana.

Ct. App. Ind. Certiorari denied.
§ 87.347 Supplemental eligibility. ( a ) Aeronautical utility stations may transmit on unicom frequencies only at airports which have a unicom and a part-time or no control tower, an RCO or an FAA flight service station.
( b ) An applicant for an aeronautical utility station operating on a unicom frequency or the frequency 122.900 MHz must: ( 1 ) Have a need to routinely operate a ground vehicle on the airport movement area;
( 2 ) Maintain a list of the vehicle(s) in which the station is to be located;
( 3 ) Certify on the application that either the applicant is the airport owner or operator, or a state or local government aeronautical agency, or that the airport owner or operator has granted permission to operate the vehicle(s) on the airport movement area.
( c ) An applicant for an aeronautical utility station requesting authority to transmit on the local control (tower) frequency or on the control tower remote communications outlet (RCO) frequency must certify that the Air Traffic Manager of the airport control tower approves the requested use of the tower or RCO frequency.
[53 FR 28940, Aug. 1, 1988, as amended at 55 FR 30464, July 26, 1990; 55 FR 30908, July 30, 1990; 63 FR 68958, Dec. 14, 1998]
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 506

To allow individuals to participate in voluntary prayer or a moment of

silence in any public building supported in whole or in part through

the expenditure of Federal funds.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 21, 1993

Mr. FRANKS of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To allow individuals to participate in voluntary prayer or

a moment of silence in any public building supported

in whole or in part through the expenditure of Federal

funds.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. VOLUNTARY PRAYER OR MOMENT OF SILENCE.

4 An individual shall have the right to participate in

5 voluntary prayer or a moment of silence in any public

6 building supported in whole or in part through the expend7 iture of Federal funds.

Æ
#### § 61.18 Scope.

The rules in this subpart apply to all nondominant carriers.

[64 FR 46587, Aug. 26, 1999]
```

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 158 (Wednesday, August 16, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 47220]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6988]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADVISORY BOARD

Notice of Public Hearing

    Board Action: Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3511(d), the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, and the FASAB Rules Of 
Procedure, as amended in April, 2004, notice is hereby given that the 
Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) will hold a public 
hearing in conjunction with its September 27, 2006 Board meeting. the 
public hearing will begin at 9 a.m. and will address the exposure draft 
(ED) entitled Definition and Recognition of Elements of Accrual-Basis 
Financial Statements. Those interested in testifying should contact Ms. 
Terri Pinkney, Administrative Assistant, no later than one week prior 
to the hearing. Ms. Pinkney can be reached at (202) 512-7350 or via e-
mail at [email protected]. Also, they should at the same time provide 
a short biography and written copies of their testimony. The ED is 
available on the FASAB Web site http://www.fasab.gov under Exposure 
Drafts.
    A more detailed agenda can be obtained from the FASAB Web site 
(http://www.fasab.gov) one week prior to each meeting.
    Any interested person may attend the meetings as an observer. Board 
discussion and reviews are open to the public. GAO Building security 
requires advance notice of your attendance. Please notify FASAB of your 
planned attendance by calling (202) 512-7350 at least one day prior to 
the respective meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wendy M. Comes, Executive Director, 
441 G St., NW., Mail Stop 6K17V, Washington, DC 20548, or call (202) 
512-7350.

    Authority: Federal Advisory Committee Act. Pub. L. No. 92-363.

    Dated: August 14, 2006.
Charles Jackson,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 06-6988 Filed 8-15-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-01-M
```
#### § 18.121 Dates this subpart is in effect.

Regulations in this subpart are effective from August 5, 2021, through August 5, 2026, for year-round oil and gas exploration, development, and production.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S
NO. WR-WR- 81,751-01

IN RE JUAN DA MAS RODRIG UEZ, Re lator

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NO. 10-03-15982-A IN THE 106 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM G AINES COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R
Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ o f m an damus pursuant to the orig inal jurisdiction of this Court. I n it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habea s corpus in the 106 District Court o f Gaines County , that more than 35 day s have elapse d, and that the

t h application has not y et bee n forwa rded to this Court. I n these circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d. Respondent, the District Clerk of Gaines County , is order ed to f

ile a response , which may be made by submitt ing the rec ord on such habea s corpus application, submitt ing a copy of a timely filed order which desig nates issues to be investiga ted ( see McCree v. Hampton , 824 S.W .2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)), or stating that2

Relator has not filed an application for a writ of habea s corpus in Gaine s C o u n t y . Should the response include an order desig nating issues, proof of the date the district attorne y ’s o ff i ce was
serve d with the habea s application shall also be submitted with the response. T his application for leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abey ance until Respondent has su b m i t t ed the appropr iate re sponse. Such re sponse shall be submitted within 30 day s of the date of this order.

Filed: Aug ust 13, 2014 Do not publish
§ 69.604 Billing and collection of access charges. ( a ) Telephone companies shall bill and collect all access charges except those charges specified in §§ 69.116 and 69.117.
( b ) All access charges shall be billed monthly.
[51 FR 9012, Mar. 17, 1986, as amended at 52 FR 21543, June 8, 1987]
§ 14.122 Food and water. ( a ) A nonhuman primate shall be provided water suitable for drinking within 4 hours prior to commencement of transport to the United States unless the shipper's written instructions direct otherwise. A carrier shall provide suitable drinking water to any primate at least every 12 hours after acceptance for transport to the United States, unless instructed in writing to do so more frequently by the shipper.
( b ) After acceptance for transport, and unless otherwise instructed in writing by the shipper, a carrier shall provide suitable food to any nonhuman primate at least once every 12 hours.
§ 69.406 Local business office expenses in Account 6620. ( a ) Local business office expenses shall be assigned as follows: ( 1 ) End user service order processing expenses attributable to presubscription shall be apportioned among the Common Line, Switching, and Transport elements in the same proportion as the investment apportioned to those elements pursuant to § 69.309.
( 2 ) End user service order processing, payment and collection, and billing inquiry expenses attributable to the company's own interstate private line and special access service shall be assigned to the Special Access element.
( 3 ) End user service order processing, payment and collection, and billing inquiry expenses attributable to interstate private line service offered by an interexhange carrier shall be assigned to the billing and collection category.
( 4 ) End user service order processing, payment and collection, and billing inquiry expenses attributable to the company's own interstate message toll service shall be assigned to the interexchange category. End user service order processing, payment and collection, and billing inquiry expenses attributable to interstate message toll service offered by an interexchange carrier shall be assigned to the billing and collection category. End user payment and collection and billing inquiry expenses attributable to End User Common Line access billing shall be assigned to the Common Line element.
( 5 ) End user service order processing, payment and collection, and billing inquiry expenses attributable to TWX service shall be assigned to the Special Access element.
( 6 ) Interexchange carrier service order processing, payment and collection, and billing inquiry expenses attributable to private lines and special access shall be assigned to the Special Access element.
( 7 ) Interexchange carrier service order processing, payment and collection, and billing inquiry expenses attributable to interstate switched access and message toll, shall be apportioned among the Common Line, Local Switching and Transport elements in the same proportion as the investment apportioned to those elements pursuant to § 69.309.
( 8 ) Interexchange carrier service order processing, payment and collection, and billing inquiry expenses attributable to billing and collection service shall be assigned to the billing and collection category.
[52 FR 37313, Oct. 6, 1987, as amended at 62 FR 31939, June 11, 1997]
In The Matter Of: 

CLELIA AYALA 

Respondent 

SERVED: May 15,2013 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC [[/.! ;:,~.v r ' I . :J A 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket No. FAA-2012-0910 

Case No. 2010S0290061 

ORDER SETTING 

THIRD LITIGATION SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 

On February 13, 2013, an Order Setting Discovery Deadlines and Procedures was filed. 

0· "'j- ,. j 

On May 14, 2013, the parties appeared by telephone for a Status Conference and 

discussed their progress in completing discovery, the disputed issue of venue, and other litigation 

procedural matters. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §13.205(a)(1), (6) and (7), Civ. R. 16, 

14 C.F.R. §13.217, and 14 C.F.R. §13.220, and after reviewing all relevant caselaw, regulations, 

statutory authority, and being fully advised; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. June 11,2013 Telephone Conference at 11:00am-12:00pm EST. The parties shall 

appear for a third Telephone Conference on June 11,2013 at 11:00am-12:00pm EST. At this 

conference the parties will discuss the status of the case (e.g., venue location, scope of issued to 

be tried at the hearing, any remaining discovery needed, etc), and be prepared to participate in 

further litigation scheduling. 

2. If the parties reach a settlement prior to June 11, 2013, the FAA Attorney will notify the 

administrative court and file all needed documentation. 

3. For clarifications of this order or questions with regard to the procedures to be followed 

in this case, please contact Mr. Cody L. Smith, Attorney-Advisor at the Office of 

Hearings, at (202) 366-6941. 

Attachment: Service List 
' • 

SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl0001 

Mr. William P. Vines, Esq. 

Complainant's Counsel 

Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AS0-7 

Southern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 20636 

Atlanta, GA 30320 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

Ms. Clelia Ayala 

Lay Respondent 

11175 Georgia Avenue, Apt. 603 . 

Wheaton, MD 20902 

TEL: 305-588-9397 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

US. Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

ONE COPY 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2142 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

DocketNo. FAA-2012-0910 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 

Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing 

Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

Page 2 of 2
#### § 80.96 Maintenance tests.

Stations are authorized to engage in test transmissions necessary for maintenance of the station. Test transmissions must conform to appropriate test operating procedures.
#### § 87.169 Scope.

This subpart contains class of station symbols and a frequency table which lists assignable frequencies. Frequencies in the Aviation Services will transmit communications for the safe, expeditious, and economic operation of aircraft and the protection of life and property in the air. Each class of land station may communicate in accordance with the particular sections of this part which govern these classes. Land stations in the Aviation Services in Alaska may transmit messages concerning sickness, death, weather, ice conditions or other matters relating to safety of life and property if there is no other established means of communications between the points in question and no charge is made for the communications service.

[69 FR 32882, June 14, 2004]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.01
                          VERITAS Software Corporation
                 Statement Re Computation of Per Share Earnings
                    (In thousands, except per share amounts)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                   -------------------------------
                                                     1996       1995        1994
                                                   -------     -------     -------
<S>                                                <C>         <C>         <C>    
Net income ...................................     $ 9,768     $ 9,874     $ 2,838
                                                   =======     =======     =======

Computation of weighted average common
  and common equivalent shares outstanding
   (primary):
    Weighted average common shares outstanding      13,383      12,914      12,252

    Common equivalent shares attributable
    to warrants and stock options ............       1,022         850         597
                                                   -------     -------     -------
Shares used in per share computation .........      14,405      13,764      12,849
                                                   =======     =======     =======

Net income per share .........................     $  0.68     $  0.72     $  0.22
                                                   =======     =======     =======

Computation of weighted average common
  and common equivalent shares outstanding
   (fully diluted):
    Weighted average common shares outstanding      13,383      12,914      12,252

    Common equivalent shares attributable
    to warrants and stock options ............       1,246       1,003         642
                                                   -------     -------     -------
Shares used in per share computation .........      14,629      13,917      12,894
                                                   =======     =======     =======

Net income per share .........................     $  0.67     $  0.71     $  0.22
                                                   =======     =======     =======
</TABLE>
9%~ A~TO~RNEY GENERAL 

Gerald C. Mann 

OF TEXAS 

Hon. Robert D. Penn 

County Attorney 

Reeves County 

Pews, Texas 

Deer Sir: 

Opinion No. O-1144 

Re: Is the County Judge entitled to a 

three dollar fee in a civil case, 

where the plaintiff dismisses the suit 

in vacation, before an answer is filed 

and pays the costs? 

Your .request for an opinion upon the above stated question has been received by this department. 

We quote from your letter as follows: 

“A question has arisen in this County regarding 

the proper charge for a fee of office by the County 

Jydge in a civil case under the following facts: 

‘*A civil suit was filed in County Court but no 

citation was issued and several days later upon settlement of the suit the Plaintiff desired to pay the 

costs and dismiss the suit in vacation by notation on 

the docket, as no answer had been filed. The question has arisen as to whether in such a case the 

County Judge’s fee of 53.00 should be charged. Article 3926, R.c.s., 1925, provides for a fee of $3.00 

for the County Judge ‘for each civil case finally 

disposed of by him by trial or otherwise’ but as the 

case was dismissed in vacation and the County Judge 

has had to enter no judgment of any kind, the Plaintiff questions his right to a fee. 

“1 would appreciate your advice as to whether 

or not in a situation such as this the Judge is entitled to a fee *I‘ 

Article 3926, Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, in 

part, reads as follows: 

“The county judge shall also receive the following fees: 

*1. *** 

“2. *** For each civil cause finally disposed of 

by him by trial or otherwise, three dollars, to be 
Hon. Robert D. Penn, page 2 (O-1144) 

taxed against the party cast in the suit; 

***:a 

Article 2089, Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, reads 

as follows: 

"The plaintiff may enter a discontinuance 

on the docket in vacation, in any suit where%: 

the defendant has not answered, on the payment 

of all costs that have accrued thereon." 

You are, therefore, respectfully advised that it is 

the opinion ,of this department, under the facts stated in your 

letter, the county judge would not be entitled to a three dollar fee in a civil case dismissed by the plaintiff in vacation 

before any answer was filed and where the plaintiff paid all 

costs that had accrued thereon. 

Trusting that this answers your inquiry, we are 

Yours very truly 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

By /s/ Wm. J. Fanning 

Wm. J. Fanning, Assistant 

APPROVED JHL 22, 1939 

/s/ W. F. Moore 

FIRST ASSISTANT ATTORNGY GENBRAL 

APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE 

BY: T.P.R., CHAIRMAN 

WmJFtob8wb
69–008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 106–69

PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 4, DECLARATION OF POLICY OF THE UNITED STATES CONCERNING

NATIONAL MISSILE DEFENSE DEPLOYMENT

MARCH 17, 1999.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. REYNOLDS, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 120]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 120, by a record vote of 8 to 3, report the same to the

House with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 4, the ‘‘Declaration of Policy of the United States Concerning National Missile

Defense Deployment’’ under a closed rule. The rule provides 2

hours of debate divided equally between the chairman and ranking

minority member of the Committee on Armed Services. The rule

provides one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Additionally, the rule provides that it will be in order, upon receipt of a message from the Senate transmitting H.R. 4 with Senate amendments, to consider in the House a motion offered by the

Chairman of the Armed Services Committee or his designee that

the House disagree to the Senate amendments and request or

agree to a conference with the Senate.

COMMITTEE VOTES

Pursuant to clause 3(b) of House rule XIII the results of each

record vote on an amendment or motion to report, together with

the names of those voting for and against, are printed below:

Rules Committee record vote No. 6

Date: March 17, 1999.

Measure: H.R. 4, Declaration of Policy of the United States Concerning National Missile Defense Deployment.

Motion by: Mr. Moakley.
2

Summary of motion: To make in order the Allen (ME) amendment in the nature of a substitute; waive all points of order against

it; and to provide sixty minutes of debate thereon, equally divided

and controlled between the proponent and opponent.

Results: Defeated 3–8.

Vote by Members: Goss—Nay; Linder—Nay; Pryce—Nay; DiazBalart—Nay; Hastings—Nay; Sessions—Nay; Reynolds—Nay;

Moakley—Yea; Hall—Yea; Slaughter—Yea; Dreier—Nay.

Rules Committee record vote No. 7

Date: March 17, 1999.

Measure: H.R. 4, Declaration of Policy of the United States Concerning National Missile Defense Deployment.

Motion by: Mr. Moakley.

Summary of motion: To increase the debate time from 2 hours

to 3 hours.

Results: Defeated 3–8.

Vote by Members: Goss—Nay; Linder—Nay; Pryce—Nay; DiazBalart—Nay; Hastings—Nay; Sessions—Nay; Reynolds—Nay;

Moakley—Yea; Hall—Yea; Slaughter—Yea; Dreier—Nay.

Rules Committee record vote No. 8

Date: March 17, 1999.

Measure: H.R. 4, Declaration of Policy of the United States Concerning National Missile Defense Deployment.

Motion by: Mr. Goss.

Summary of motion: To report the rule providing for consideration of H.R. 4.

Results: Adopted 8–3.

Vote by Members: Goss—Yea; Linder—Yea; Pryce—Yea; DiazBalart—Yea; Hastings—Yea; Sessions—Yea; Reynolds—Yea; Moakley—Nay; Hall—Nay; Slaughter—Nay; Dreier—Yea.

Æ