alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w2



 





Exhibit 10.2




[LETTERHEAD FOR NIH OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER]




March 8, 2007




Dr. Ronald D. Wiehle, Ph.D.

Vice President of Research and Development

Repros Therapeutics, Inc.

2408 Timberloch Place, B-7

The Woodlands, Texas 77380





			
	Subject:	 	Waiver of United States Manufacturing Requirement
under PHS License L-354-1998/0 
to Repros
Therapeutic, Inc. for E-016-1996/0 “21-Substituted
Progesterone Derivatives as 
New Antiprogestational
Agents” developed by Hyun K. Kim et al at NICHD.





Dear Dr. Wiehle:




     Your request for a waiver of the U.S. manufacturing requirement for the above-captioned
technology, as presented to this office in your January 18, 2007 letter to PHS has been evaluated.
The determination is to grant this waiver, based on the assertions made by Repros Therapuetics,
Inc. (Repros) that it would be expensive and difficult to set up and arrange production in the
United States of the ProllexTM CDB4124 derived from the above referenced technology and
that product quality would be adversely affected.



     Thus, in accordance with and relying on representations made by Repros, OTT grants a waiver of
the U.S. manufacturing requirement (35 U.S.C. § 204) to Repros. Repros shall be permitted to make,
produce or otherwise manufacture the ProllexTM CDB4124 using the above referenced
technology outside the United States (U.S.) and to sell inside the U.S.



     This waiver shall be in full force and effect as of the date of this letter, and shall remain
in effect for the term of PHS license L-354-1998/0, unless license L-354-1998/0 is sooner
terminated.



     If I may be of further assistance, please contact me.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Sincerely yours, 

 	 
	 	/s/ Steven M. Ferguson
 	 
	 	Steven M. Ferguson, M.B.A. 	 
	 	Director, Division of Technology Development
and Transfer
#### Nathan Bilder, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Kornit Manufacturing Company, Plaintiff, *v.*Charles B. Ellis, Defendant.

(Supreme Court, New York Special Term,

March, 1910.)

Attachment — When attachment authorized — In general — Two attachments.

Two warrants of attachment may be issued in the same action, one on the ground of defendant’s nonresidence and another on the ground of the transfer of his property with intent to defraud creditors.

*540Motion to vacate an attachment.

Cohen, Creevey & Richter, for plaintiff.

John J.Vause, for defendant.

Gerard, J.

This is a motion to vacate an attachment. The question as to plaintiff’s right to recover the sum claimed by him has been passed upon by Mr. Justice Seabury. The remaining questions are: 1. Has plaintiff set forth sufficient proof to show that defendant has transferred his property with intent to defraud his creditors ? 2. Has the plaintiff a right to obtain a second attachment on the ground that the defendant has transferred property with intent to defraud, having already obtained an attachment on the ground that the defendant is a nonresident? I can find nothing in the Code to preventdhe granting of one attachment on the ground of nonresidence and another on the ground of intent to defraud creditors by transfer of property. In Kibbe v. Wetmore, 31 Hun, 425, there are dicta which would seem to approve of this practice. As to the grounds of the attachment, I think the evidence sufficiently establishes that defendant has transferred his property with intent to defraud his creditors, and the motion is therefore denied, with costs.

Motion denied, with costs.
Exhibit 14

Adopted September 2005

TOYS R US, INC. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND SENIOR FINANCIAL

OFFICERS CODE OF ETHICS

Toys R Us, Inc. (the Company) has a Code of Ethical Standards and Business Practices and Conduct (the Code) applicable to all directors and salaried employees of the Company. The Companys Chief
Executive Officer (CEO) and senior financial officers are bound by the provisions of the Code. In addition, the CEO and senior financial officers are subject to the following additional specific policies requiring them to:



| |  |  | act with honesty and integrity and handle ethically any actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | ensure that all reports and documents filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and any public communications by the Company, contain full, fair, accurate,
timely and understandable disclosures;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | comply with all applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations; and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | promptly report violations of the Code or of these policies to the Board of Directors or the Companys Confidential Ethics Hotline.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Board of Directors will determine, or designate appropriate persons to determine, appropriate actions to be taken in the event of violations of the
Code or of these additional policies by the Companys CEO and senior financial officers. Such actions will be reasonably designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote accountability for adherence to the Code and these additional policies.



---

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND SENIOR FINANCIAL OFFICERS
CODE OF ETHICS

I hereby certify that I have read and understand the Toys R Us, Inc. Chief Executive Officer and Senior
Financial Officers Code of Ethics, dated September 2005, and certify that I have complied with, and that I will continue to comply with, such code, except as noted below. I also certify my understanding that any failure by me to comply with such
code may result in disciplinary action against me, up to and including termination of my employment.



|            |  | 
|----------- |  | 
|Signature:  |  | 
|            | 
|Print Name: |  | 
|            | 
|Job Title:  |  | 
|            | 
|Date:       |  |
EXHIBIT 10 (iii) (F) (a)


	
 

	
 


	
 

	
March 15, 2007





Mr. Louis J. Cappelli, Chairman

Sterling Bancorp

650 Fifth Avenue

New York, New York 10019


Dear Mr. Cappelli:


This will confirm the following amendment to your Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement, dated as of March 22, 2002, with our Company, which was
last amended by letter agreement dated March 15, 2006:


          The date
in
the third line of Paragraph 1 (captioned “Term”)

                    
is amended to December 31, 2011.


The foregoing amendment was adopted by the Compensation Committee and
approved by the Board of Directors at its March 15, 2007 meeting.


Kindly sign and return the enclosed copy to the Company in order to
confirm your understanding and acceptance of the foregoing amendment.


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
Sincerely,


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
Sterling Bancorp


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
By: 

	
 /s/  Dale C.
  Fredston


	
 

	
 

	
 

	



	
 

	
 

	
 

	
Secretary








	
	
 


	
Agreed:

	
 


	
 

	
 


	
/s/ Louis J. Cappelli

	
 


	


	
 


	
Louis J. Cappelli 

	
 





PAGE 90
#### § 14.24 Scientific specimens.

Except for wildlife requiring a permit pursuant to parts 16, 17, 18, 21, 22 or 23 of this subchapter, dead, preserved, dried, or embedded scientific specimens or parts thereof, imported or exported by accredited scientists or accredited scientific institutions for taxonomic or systematic research purposes may enter or exit through any U.S. Customs port, or may be shipped through the international mail system. *Provided,* that this exception will not apply to any specimens or parts thereof taken as a result of sport hunting.

[61 FR 31869, June 21, 1996]
No. 11-6103.

#### Lopez-Atanacio *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 19.11 General prohibitions. ( a ) Except as otherwise authorized by the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956 as amended, no person shall: ( 1 ) While airborne in any aircraft shoot or attempt to shoot for the purpose of capturing or killing any wildlife;
( 2 ) Use an aircraft to harass any wildlife; or
( 3 ) Knowingly participate in using an aircraft whether in the aircraft or on the ground for any purpose referred to in paragraph (a) (1) or (2) of this section.
( b ) The acts prohibited in this section include, but are not limited to, any person who: ( 1 ) Pilots or assists in the operation of an aircraft from which another person shoots or shoots at wildlife while airborne, or
( 2 ) While on the ground takes or attempts to take any wildlife by means, aid, or use of an aircraft.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 501 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 501

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to include foreign deposits 
                        in the assessment base.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 21, 1993

  Mr. Darden introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
            Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to include foreign deposits 
                        in the assessment base.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FOREIGN DEPOSITS INCLUDED IN ASSESSMENT BASE.

    Subparagraph (B) of section 7(b)(5) of the Federal Deposit 
Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(b)(5)) is amended by striking ``any 
deposits received in any office of the depository institution for 
deposit in any other office of the depository institution located in 
the United States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, 
American Samoa, the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, or the 
Virgin Islands, except'' and inserting ``any deposits, and any 
obligations which would constitute deposits as defined in section 3(l) 
but for subparagraphs (A) and (B) of section 3(l)(5), received in any 
office of the depository institution (other than a foreign branch of a 
foreign bank (as such term is defined in section 1(b)(7) of the 
International Banking Act)), except''.

                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.1: Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications





I, Wenge Fang, certify that:





1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of China Water Group, Inc. (the “Registrant”);




2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.  The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and have:




a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this  report is being prepared;




b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.  The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the smaller reporting Registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.




Date: June 9, 2011
/s/ Wenge FangWenge Fang, Chief Executive Officer
No. 10-11155.

#### Baney *v.*Merit Systems Protection Board.

C. A. Fed. Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *informa pauperis*denied and leave to proceed as a veteran granted. Cer-tiorari denied.
No. 11-10092.

#### Lopez-Sanchez v. Tamez, Warden.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### §§ 95.2311-95.2323 [Reserved]
§ 96.49 Equipment authorization. ( a ) Each transmitter used for operation under this part and each transmitter marketed as set forth in § 2.803 of this chapter must be of a type which has been certificated for use under this part.
( b ) Any manufacturer of radio transmitting equipment to be used in these services must request equipment authorization following the procedures set forth in subpart J of part 2 of this chapter.
#### §§ 95.2387-95.2391 [Reserved]
#### ANN E. RILEY, as Executrix, etc., of EDWARD T. RILEY, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*WILLIAM S. CORWIN, Appellant.

*Statute of limitations*— *constitutes a distinct new defence*— it *cannot be first set up during a trial before a referee.*

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered on the report of a referee.

The court at General Term said: “The plaintiff in this case was allowed, on the trial, by the referee, to add to his reply in answer to a counter-claim interposed; and in addition to his defences in the reply contained, to interpose the statute of limitations. This was error. On the trial a referee, under the Code of Procedure, has not such power. This seems to be settled by authority. It is a new defence. *(Ford*v. *Ford,*53 Barb., 525; *Sinclair*v. *Neill,*1 Hun, 80; *Mitchell Bunn,*2 N. Y. [T. *&.*C.], Sup. Ct. Rep., 486 ; *Josyln*v. *Josyln,*9 Hun, 388; *Phillips*v. *Melville,*10 id., 211; *Smith*v. *Bathbun,*13 id., 47; *Boeder*v. *Sayre,*70 N. Y., 180.)

“ The amount of the counter-claim having been ascertained and determined by the referee, however, a new trial may be avoided by deducting it from the judgment. Unless the plaintiff consent that this bo done a now trial is ordered, with costs to abide event. If done the judgment is affirmed for the balance, without costs to either party.”

*Henry B. Howland,*for the appellant. *George II. Starr,*for the respondent.

Opinion

*Per Curiam.*

Present — Brady, P. J., and Potter, J.

Judgment reversed, now trial ordered, costs to abide event; *598unless plaintiff consent to a deduction of the counter-claim from the judgment, in which event judgment affirmed, as so modified, without costs.
1

Sutton, Tia

From: Sutton, Tia

Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 5:47 PM

To: Whiteman, Chad

Cc: Hengst, Benjamin

Subject: EPA responses to EO 12866 Comments on EPA Aircraft Endangerment Finding 

NOPR/GHG Standards ANPR (2060-AS31)

Attachments: Aircraft GHG Response to OMB- 4-23-15.docx

Hi Chad, 

Attached please find EPA’s responses to the Aircraft GHG Interagency comments. The file is in track changes with 

comment bubbles. In ‘anonymizing’ the file, both the Interagency comments and EPA’s responses now show up as 

“Author”, so EPA’s responses are all denoted with yellow highlighting. 

Please let us know if you have any questions. 

Thanks! 

 -Tia 

(202) 564-8929
###### Editorial Note on Part 11

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 11 appear at 67 FR 38208, June 3, 2002.

#### § 11.24 Final administrative action.

Unless a notice of request for an appeal is filed in accordance with § 11.25 of this subpart C, the administrative law judge's decision shall constitute the final administrative determination of the Secretary in the matter and shall become effective 30 calendar days from the date of the decision.
§ 15.11 Prohibitions. ( a ) Except as provided under a permit issued pursuant to subpart C of this part, it is unlawful for any person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States to commit, attempt to commit, to solicit another to commit, or to cause to be committed, any of the acts described in paragraphs (b) through (f) of this section in regard to any exotic bird.
( b ) It is unlawful to import into the United States any exotic bird species listed in the Appendices to the Convention that is not included in the approved list of species, pursuant to subpart D of this part, except that this paragraph (b) does not apply to any exotic bird that was bred in a foreign breeding facility listed as qualifying pursuant to subpart E of this part.
( c ) It is unlawful to import into the United States any exotic bird species not listed in the Appendices to the Convention that is listed in the prohibited species list, pursuant to subpart F of this part.
( d ) It is unlawful to import into the United States any exotic bird species from any country included in the prohibited country list, pursuant to subpart F of this part.
( e ) It is unlawful to import into the United States any exotic bird species from a qualifying facility breeding exotic birds in captivity, listed pursuant to subpart E of this part, if the exotic bird was not captive-bred at the listed facility.
( f ) It is unlawful for any person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States to engage in any activity with an exotic bird imported under a permit issued pursuant to this part that violates a condition of said permit.
[58 FR 60536, Nov. 16, 1993, as amended at 59 FR 62255, Dec. 2, 1994]
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P216The Early Release of Prisoners and Its Impact on Police Agencies and Communities in CaliforniaThe Early Release of Prisoners and its Impact on Police Agencies and Communities in California is based on a collaborative effort between the COPS Office and the Police Executive Research Forum (PERF). In October 2010, an executive session comprising police and researchers convened in California. This publication is intended to offer the views of many police leaders about how tomorrow's law enforcement agencies may need to assume a new leadership role, working with other criminal justice agencies as well as social service and private organizations, in solving the problem of high recidivism among persons released from prisons.Categories: Alternatives to IncarcerationLanguage: EnglishLow stockPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p216Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFBook • Oct 2011Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 02:12 (UTC-5) in 0.21 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive