alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 76.612 Cable television frequency separation standards. All cable television systems which operate analog NTSC or similar channels in the frequency bands 108-137 MHZ and 225-400 MHz shall comply with the following frequency separation standards for each NTSC or similar channel: ( a ) In the aeronautical radiocommunication bands 118-137, 225-328.6 and 335.4-400 MHz, the frequency of all carrier signals or signal components carried at an average power level equal to or greater than 10−4 watts in a 25 kHz bandwidth in any 160 microsecond period must operate at frequencies offset from certain frequencies which may be used by aeronautical radio services operated by Commission licensees or by the United States Government or its Agencies. The aeronautical frequencies from which offsets must be maintained are those frequencies which are within one of the aeronautical bands defined in this subparagraph, and when expressed in MHz and divided by 0.025 yield an integer. The offset must meet one of the following two criteria: ( 1 ) All such cable carriers or signal components shall be offset by 12.5 kHz with a frequency tolerance of ±5 kHz; or
( 2 ) The fundamental frequency from which the visual carrier frequencies are derived by multiplication by an integer number which shall be 6.0003 MHz with a tolerance of ±1 Hz (Harmonically Related Carrier (HRC) comb generators only).
( b ) In the aeronautical radionavigation bands 108-118 and 328.6-335.4 MHz, the frequency of all carrier signals or signal components carrier at an average power level equal to or greater than 10−4 watts in a 25 kHz bandwidth in any 160 microsecond period shall be offset by 25 kHz with a tolerance of ±5 kHz. The aeronautical radionavigation frequencies from which offsets must be maintained are defined as follows: ( 1 ) Within the aeronautical band 108-118 MHz when expressed in MHz and divided by 0.025 yield an even integer.
( 2 ) Within the band 328.6-335.4 MHz, the radionavigation glide path channels are listed in Section 87.501 of the Rules.
Note:
The HRC system, as described above, will meet this requirement in the 328.6-335.4 MHz navigation glide path band. Those Incrementally Related Carriers (IRC) systems, with comb generator reference frequencies set at certain odd multiples equal to or greater than 3 times the 0.0125 MHz aeronautical communications band offset, e.g. (6n + 1.250 ±0.0375) MHz, may also meet the 25 kHz offset requirement in the navigation glide path band.
[50 FR 29400, July 19, 1985, as amended at 83 FR 7630, Feb. 22, 2018]
#### § 76.1206 Equipment sale or lease charge subsidy prohibition.

Multichannel video programming distributors offering navigation devices subject to the provisions of § 76.923 for sale or lease directly to subscribers, shall adhere to the standards reflected therein relating to rates for equipment and installation and shall separately state the charges to consumers for such services and equipment.
§ 73.25 Clear channels; Class A, Class B and Class D stations. The frequencies in the following tabulations are designated as clear channels and assigned for use by the Classes of stations given: ( a ) On each of the following channels, one Class A station may be assigned, operating with power of 50 kW: 640, 650, 660, 670, 700, 720, 750, 760, 770, 780, 820, 830, 840, 870, 880, 890, 1020, 1030, 1040, 1100, 1120, 1160, 1180, 1200, and 1210 kHz. In Alaska, these frequencies can be used by Class A stations subject to the conditions set forth in § 73.182(a)(1)(ii). On the channels listed in this paragraph, Class B and Class D stations may be assigned.
( b ) To each of the following channels there may be assigned Class A, Class B and Class D stations: 680, 710, 810, 850, 940, 1000, 1060, 1070, 1080, 1090, 1110, 1130, 1140, 1170, 1190, 1500, 1510, 1520, 1530, 1540, 1550, and 1560 kHz. Note:
Until superseded by a new agreement, protection of the Bahama Islands shall be in accordance with NARBA. Accordingly, a Class A, Class B or Class D station on 1540 kHz shall restrict its signal to a value no greater than 5 μV/m groundwave or 25 μV/m-10% skywave at any point of land in the Bahama Islands, and such stations operating nighttime (*i.e.*, sunset to sunrise at the location of the U.S. station) shall be located not less than 650 miles from the nearest point of land in the Bahama Islands.
( c ) Class A, Class B and Class D stations may be assigned on 540, 690, 730, 740, 800, 860, 900, 990, 1010, 1050, 1220, 1540, 1570, and 1580 kHz.
[28 FR 13574, Dec. 14, 1963, as amended at 33 FR 4410, Mar. 12, 1968; 35 FR 18052, Nov. 25, 1970; 47 FR 27862, June 28, 1982; 49 FR 43960, Nov. 1, 1984; 50 FR 24520, June 11, 1985; 52 FR 47568, Dec. 15, 1987; 53 FR 1031, Jan. 15, 1988; 54 FR 39736, Sept. 28, 1989; 56 FR 64857, Dec. 12, 1991]
§ 96.32 Priority access assignments of authorization, transfers of control, and leasing arrangements. ( a ) Priority Access Licensees may transfer or assign their licenses and enter into de facto leasing arrangements in accordance with part 1 of this chapter.
( b ) Priority Access Licensees may partition or disaggregate their licenses and partially assign or transfer their licenses pursuant to § 1.950 of this chapter and may enter into de facto transfer leasing arrangements for a portion of their licensed spectrum pursuant to part 1 of this chapter.
( c ) Priority Access Licensees may enter into spectrum manager leasing arrangements with approved entities as prescribed in § 1.9046 of this chapter. Priority Access Licensees may only enter into leasing arrangements for areas that are within their Service Area and outside of their PAL Protection Areas.
[81 FR 49068, July 26, 2016, as amended at 83 FR 63096, Dec. 7, 2018; 85 FR 25315, May 1, 2020]]
545 S.E.2d 585

#### Cory Alver JEFFERSON, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia, Appellee.

Record No. 0953-99-2.

Court of Appeals of Virginia.

May 8, 2001.

Douglas A. Ramseur (D. Gregory Carr; Bowen, Bryant, Champlin *&*Carr, on briefs), Richmond, for appellant.

Leah A. Darron, Assistant Attorney General (Mark L. Earley, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.

Before FITZPATRICK, C.J., and BENTON, WILLIS, ELDER, BRAY, ANNUNZIATA, BUMGARDNER, FRANK, HUMPHREYS, CLEMENTS and AGEE, JJ.

UPON A REHEARING EN BANC

By opinion dated August 22, 2000, a divided panel of this Court affirmed the judgment of the trial court. *See Jefferson v. Commonwealth,*33 Va.App. 230, 532 S.E.2d 899 (2000). We *437granted rehearing *en bane*and stayed the mandate of that decision.

Upon rehearing *en banc,*the stay of this Court’s August 22, 2000 mandate is lifted, and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the majority panel decision.

Judges BENTON, ELDER and ANNUNZIATA concur in part and dissent in part for the reasons set forth in the panel concurrence and dissent.

It is ordered that the trial court allow the court-appointed attorneys for the appellant an additional fee of $200 for services rendered the appellant on the rehearing portion of this appeal, in addition to counsel’s costs and necessary direct out-of-pocket expenses. This amount shall be added to the costs due the Commonwealth in the August 22, 2000 mandate.

This order shall be published and certified to the trial court.
- [Untitled]
- [Untitled] Redo
- [Untitled] 4
- [Untitled] 5
§ 76.983 Discrimination. ( a ) No Federal agency, state, or local franchising authority may prohibit a cable operator from offering reasonable discounts to senior citizens or to economically disadvantaged groups. ( 1 ) Such discounts must be offered equally to all subscribers in the franchise area who qualify as members of these categories, or any reasonable subcategory thereof.
( 2 ) For purposes of this section, members of economically disadvantaged groups are those individuals who receive federal, state or local welfare assistance.
( b ) Nothing herein shall preclude any Federal agency, state, or local franchising authority from requiring and regulating the reception of cable service by hearing impaired individuals.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Eli Anton Robles

, * From the 42nd District Court

o f Taylor County,

Trial Court No

. 283 12 A

Vs. No. 11

- 20

- 00 174

- CR * May 12

, 20 2 2

The State of Texas

, * Memorandum Opinion by Trotter , J

. (P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion,

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Source Direct Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Dated:  February 21, 2006

/s/ Deren Z. Smith

Name: Deren Z. Smith

Title:  Chief Executive Officer



Dated:  February 21, 2006

/s/ Kevin Arave

Name: Kevin Arave

Title:  Chief Financial Officer
No. 11-5907.

#### Strausbaugh *v.*Ochoa, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of China Water Group, Inc. (the “Registrant”) certifies that:




1.           The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and




2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Date:  November 23, 2011
/s/ Wenge FangWenge Fang, Chief Executive Officer
#### § 76.1201 Rights of subscribers to use or attach navigation devices.

No multichannel video programming distributor shall prevent the connection or use of navigation devices to or with its multichannel video programming system, except in those circumstances where electronic or physical harm would be caused by the attachment or operation of such devices or such devices may be used to assist or are intended or designed to assist in the unauthorized receipt of service.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 169 (Thursday, August 31, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 51810]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7298]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

National Nuclear Security Administration


Extension of Comment Period on the Draft Site-Wide Environmental 
Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Los Alamos National 
Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM

AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security 
Administration (NNSA).

ACTION: Notice of comment period extension.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On July 7, 2006, NNSA published a Notice of Availability for 
the Draft Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued 
Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 
(LANL Draft SWEIS) (DOE/EIS-0380) (71 FR 38638) and announced a 60-day 
public comment period ending September 5, 2006. Subsequently, in 
response to requests for additional time to review and comment on the 
document, NNSA is extending the public comment period until September 
20, 2006.

DATES: Comments should be submitted to NNSA no later than September 20, 
2006. NNSA will consider comments submitted after this date to the 
extent practicable.

ADDRESSES: Comments, or requests for copies of the LANL Draft SWEIS 
should be sent to: U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security 
Administration, Los Alamos Site Office, Attn: Ms. Elizabeth Withers, 
SWEIS Document Manager, 528 35th Street, Los Alamos, New Mexico, 87544; 
or by facsimile (1-505-667-5948); or by e-mail at: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5b171a151704080c1e12081b3f343e3a37753c342d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a3efe2edeffcf0f4e6eaf0e3c7ccc6c2cf8dc4ccd5">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Requests for copies of the LANL Draft SWEIS or recorded comments 
may also be made by calling 1-877-491-4957. Please mark all envelopes, 
faxes and e-mail: ``LANL Draft SWEIS Comments''. The LANL Draft SWEIS 
and its reference documents are available for review at: the Robert J. 
Oppenheimer Study Center Research Library, Technical Area 3, Los Alamos 
National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico; the Office of the Northern 
New Mexico Citizens Advisory Board, 1660 Old Pecos Trail, Suite B, 
Santa Fe, New Mexico; and the Zimmerman Library, University of New 
Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico. The Draft SWEIS is available on the 
DOE Los Alamos Site Office's NEPA Web site at: http://www.doeal.gov/laso/nepa/sweis.htm.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: U.S. Department of Energy, Los Alamos 
Site Office, Attn: Ms. Elizabeth Withers, SWEIS Document Manager, 528 
35th Street, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87544; or telephone 1-505-845-4984.

    Issued in Los Alamos, NM, this 24th day of August, 2006.
Edwin L. Wilmot,
Manager.
[FR Doc. 06-7298 Filed 8-30-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19-833V

UNPUBLISHED

WARREN LATHAN,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: June 17, 2020

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS)

Steven K Jambois, Kralovec, Jambois and Schwartz, Chicago, IL, for petitioner.

Ida Nassar, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On June 5, 2019, Warren Lathan filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2 (the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered Guillain-Barre Syndrome (“GBS”) as 

a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on September 8, 2017. Petition at 1. 

The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On June 15, 2020, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report

at 1. Specifically, Respondent recommends compensation in this case. Id. at 1. 

 1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am 

required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the EGovernment Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to 

the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to 

redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of 

privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such 

material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
2

Respondent further agrees that Petitioner has satisfied the criteria set forth in the 

Vaccine Injury Table and the Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation. Id.

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          36,972
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  336,115
<ALLOWANCES>                                    33,778
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               457,331
<PP&E>                                       5,889,961
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,283,614
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,264,189
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          385,531
<BONDS>                                      1,339,850
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,107
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,015,522
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,264,189
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               914,575
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  787,323
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,110
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                152,194
<INCOME-TAX>                                    35,413
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            116,274
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,424
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   117,698
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.56


</TABLE>
No. 11-9832.

#### Beltran Valdez *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
| 32.1  | Certification      of the Chief Executive Officer of Genesis Capital Corporation of Nevada      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of  2002 |
|------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      May 15, 2009 |   | /s/ RICHARD      ASTROM |   |
|--------------------------|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|                     |   | Richard      Astrom          |   |
|                     |   | Chief      Executive Officer |   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
     SABER CAPITAL, INC. December 31, 1997 financial statements and is
     qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000866491
<NAME>                        SABER CAPITAL, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (1,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0




</TABLE>
Case 16-25980 Doc 5-1 Filed 08/12/16 Entered 08/12/16 15:37:14 Desc to

 attach correct PDF Page 1 of 2
Case 16-25980 Doc 5-1 Filed 08/12/16 Entered 08/12/16 15:37:14 Desc to

 attach correct PDF Page 2 of 2
103

D CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5123 

AMENDMENT 


rmajette on DSK89S0YB1PROD with BILLS

rmajette on DSK89S0YB1PROD with BILLS
In the Senate of the United States, 

October 6 (legislative day, September 12), 1994. 

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 5123) entitled ‘‘An Act to make a technical correction to an Act preempting State economic regulation of 

motor carriers’’, do pass with the following 

AMENDMENT: 

Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert: 

1 SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTION OF 1994 FFA AUTHOR2 IZATION ACT. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 11501(h)(2) of title 49, 

4 United States Code, is amended— 

5 (1) by striking out ‘‘and’’ at the end of subpara6 graph (A); 

7 (2) by striking out the period at the end of sub8 paragraph (B) and insert in lieu thereof a semicolon; 

9 and 

10 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘(C) does not apply to the transportation of gar12 bage and refuse; 

13 ‘‘(D) does not apply to the transportation for 

14 collection of recyclable materials that are a part of a 

15 residential curbside recycling program; and 


rmajette on DSK89S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5123 EAS 

1 ‘‘(E) does not restrict the regulatory authority of 

2 a State, political subdivision of a State, or political 

3 authority of 2 or more States before January 1, 1997, 

4 insofar as such authority relates to tow trucks or 

5 wreckers providing for-hire service.’’. 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by sub7 section (a) shall take effect on January 1, 1995. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 


rmajette on DSK89S0YB1PROD with BILLS