alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
32.1     Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of Genesis Capital
         Corporation of Nevada pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act
         of 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form  10-QSB/A of Genesis  Capital
Corporation  of Nevada (the  "Company")  for the quarter  ended June 30, 2006 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  the undersigned  Richard Astrom,  Chief Executive Officer of Genesis
Capital Corporation of Nevada,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: September 21, 2006

                                      /s/ RICHARD ASTROM
                                      -----------------------
                                      Richard Astrom
                                      Chief Executive Officer
#### § 87.149 Special requirements for automatic link establishment (ALE).

Brief signalling for the purposes of measuring the quality of a radio channel and thereafter establishing communication shall be permitted within the 2 MHz-30 MHz band. Public coast stations licensed under part 80 of this chapter providing high seas service are authorized by rule to use such signalling under the following conditions:

(a) The transmitter power shall not exceed 100 W ERP;

(b) Transmissions must sweep linearly in frequency at a rate of at least 60 kHz per second, occupying any 3 kHz bandwidth for less than 50 milliseconds;

(c) The transmitter shall scan the band no more than four times per hour;

(d) Transmissions within 6 kHz of the following protected frequencies and frequency bands must not exceed 10 μW peak ERP:

(1) Protected frequencies (kHz)

| 2091.0 | 4188.0 | 6312.0 | 12290.0 | 16420.0 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2174.5 | 4207.5 | 8257.0 | 12392.0 | 16522.0 |
| 2182.0 | 5000.0 | 8291.0 | 12520.0 | 16695.0 |
| 2187.5 | 5167.5 | 8357.5 | 12563.0 | 16750.0 |
| 2500.0 | 5680.0 | 8364.0 | 12577.0 | 16804.5 |
| 3023.0 | 6215.0 | 8375.0 | 15000.0 | 20000.0 |
| 4000.0 | 6268.0 | 8414.5 | 16000.0 | 25000.0 |
| 4177.5 | 6282.0 | 10000.0 | | |

(2) Protected bands (kHz)

4125.0-4128.0

8376.25-8386.75

13360.0-13410.0

25500.0-25670.0

(e) The instantaneous signal, which refers to the peak power that would be measured with the frequency sweep stopped, along with spurious emissions generated from the sweeping signal, must be attenuated below the peak carrier power (in watts) as follows:

(1) On any frequency more than 5 Hz from the instantaneous carrier frequency, at least 3 dB;

(2) On any frequency more than 250 Hz from the instantaneous carrier frequency, at least 40 dB; and

(3) On any frequency more than 7.5 kHz from the instantaneous carrier frequency, at least 43 + 10log10 (peak power in watts) db.

[62 FR 40308, July 28, 1997]
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105·3901

OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR Mr. TaylorMcKinnon Public Lands Campaign Director Centerfor Biological Diversity National Parks Conservation Association 738 North 5th Avenue Tucson, Arizona 85705 Dear Mr. McKinnon: Thank you for your letter dated April 18, 2011, concerning our schedule for proposed and final rulemakings to reduce emissions ofvisibility-impairingpollutants from theNavajo Generating Station. As you know, wepublished an Advance Notice ofProposed Rulemaking on August 28, 2009. This notice contained a great deal oftechnical information and in response we received substantial technical comments. We are committed to carefullyconsideringthe information we received in responseto the Advance Notice ofProposed Rulemaking as we complete our five-factor analysis for ourBest Available Retrofit Technologydetermination and draft the proposed rulemaking. It is our goal to have a proposal completed sometimethis summer; however, we cannot commit to a specific date for theproposed rulemaking at this time. Because we also anticipate receiving numerous comments on this proposal, we are also unableto commit to a date for the final action at this time. We sincerely appreciate your interest and encourage your continued participation as we move forward in addressing the issues concerningthe Navajo Generating Station. Please do not hesitate to call Anita Lee at 415-972-3958 or ColleenMcKaughan at 520-498-0118 with anyfurther questions.

cc: Ms. LisaJackson Administrator Ms. Gina McCarthy Assistant Administrator

Printed on Recycled Paper
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)/CERTIFICATIONS OF CFO**
I, Jon Gerlach, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of IKONICS Corporation; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
 b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.        Date:  May 12, 2005 /s/ Jon Gerlach   Jon Gerlach   Chief Financial Officer,and Vice President of Finance
Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Siclone Industries, Inc., on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Paul
Adams, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a)
or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date: May 3,  2006                             /s/ Paul Adams
                                               --------------
                                               Paul Adams
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               And Principal Accounting Officer
§ 217.46 Letters of Authorization. ( a ) To incidentally take marine mammals pursuant to the regulations in this subpart, AGDC must apply for and obtain (LOAs) in accordance with § 216.106 of this chapter for conducting the activity identified in § 217.40(c).
( b ) LOAs, unless suspended or revoked, may be effective for a period of time not to extend beyond the expiration date of the regulations in this subpart.
( c ) If an LOA(s) expires prior to the expiration date of the regulations in this subpart, AGDC may apply for and obtain a renewal of the LOA(s).
( d ) In the event of projected changes to the activity or to mitigation, monitoring, reporting (excluding changes made pursuant to the adaptive management provision of § 217.47(c)(1)) required by an LOA, AGDC must apply for and obtain a modification of LOAs as described in § 217.47.
( e ) Each LOA must set forth: ( 1 ) Permissible methods of incidental taking;
( 2 ) Means of effecting the least practicable adverse impact (*i.e.,* mitigation) on the species, their habitat, and the availability of the species for subsistence uses; and
( 3 ) Requirements for monitoring and reporting.
( f ) Issuance of the LOA(s) must be based on a determination that the level of taking must be consistent with the findings made for the total taking allowable under the regulations in this subpart.
( g ) Notice of issuance or denial of the LOA(s) must be published in the Federal Register within 30 days of a determination.
No. 11-5818.

#### Pressley *v.*CaroMont Health Inc. et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 95.1915 License application. ( a ) In addition to the requirements of part 1, subpart F of this chapter, each application for a 218-219 MHz Service system license must include a plan analyzing the co- and adjacent channel interference potential of the proposed system, identifying methods being used to minimize this interference, and showing how the proposed system will meet the service requirements set forth in § 95.1931 of this part. This plan must be updated to reflect changes to the 218-219 MHz Service system design or construction.
( b ) In addition to the requirements of part 1, subpart F of this chapter, each request by a 218-219 MHz Service system licensee to add, delete, or modify technical information of an individually licensed CTS (*see* § 95.1911(b) of this part) must include a description of the system after the proposed addition, deletion, or modifications, including the population in the service area, the number of component CTSs, and an explanation of how the system will satisfy the service requirements specified in § 95.1931 of this part.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 487 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 487

For the relief of Ovidio Javier Morla Paredes, Maria Estrada de Morla, 
     Javier Alfredo Morla Estrada, and Carlos Andres Morla Estrada.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 1993

  Mr. Frank of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
For the relief of Ovidio Javier Morla Paredes, Maria Estrada de Morla, 
     Javier Alfredo Morla Estrada, and Carlos Andres Morla Estrada.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE STATUS FOR OVIDIO JAVIER MORLA PAREDES, 
              MARIA ESTRADA DE MORLA, JAVIER ALFREDO MORLA ESTRADA, AND 
              CARLOS ANDRES MORLA ESTRADA.

    (a) In General.--Subject to subsection (b), for the purposes of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act, Ovidio Javier Morla Paredes, Maria 
Estrada de Morla, Javier Alfredo Morla Estrada, and Carlos Andres Morla 
Estrada shall be considered to have been lawfully admitted to the 
United States for permanent residence as of the date of the enactment 
of this Act upon payment of the required visa fees.
    (b) Deadline for Application.--Subsection (a) shall apply to an 
individual under such subsection only if the individual applies to the 
Attorney General for permanent residence status under such subsection 
within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4989 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4989

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
at 100 Northeast Monroe Street in Peoria, Illinois, as the ``Robert H. 
        Michel Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 18, 1994

 Mr. Traficant (for himself, Mr. Mineta, Mr. Shuster, Mr. Duncan, Mr. 
  Hyde, Mr. Hastert, and Mr. Gingrich) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Committee on Public Works and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
at 100 Northeast Monroe Street in Peoria, Illinois, as the ``Robert H. 
        Michel Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 100 
Northeast Monroe Street in Peoria, Illinois, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Robert H. Michel Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``Robert H. Michel Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.
                                 <all>
```
Attorney
- Client Privileged and Confidential 

### Off Road Vehicle Division



# Constant Radius Test 

# Results Comparing On Road vs. Off - Road Tires

3/12/15Attorney
- Client Privileged and Confidential 

### Off Road Vehicle Division

2 

# Compare data from the same vehicle model using different tires

• Steering Wheel Input Plots

• Lateral Acceleration Plots

• Combined Understeer Plots 

# Vehicle: 2015 Polaris RZR 900 (locked differential) used for all tests 

# Objective

OEM Tire Carlise PXT 26 ” OD; 10
- 12 psi Automotive Tire Kingstar Centum SK72 26 ” OD; 10
- 12 psi Racing Slick Tire Hoosier 22” OD; 10
- 12 psiAttorney
- Client Privileged and Confidential 

### Off Road Vehicle Division



# Steering input improves slightly with smoother tires
3 

# Unfiltered Steering Wheel Input

OEM Tire Carlise PXT 26 ” OD; 10
- 12 psi Automotive Tire Kingstar Centum SK72 26 ” OD; 10
- 12 psi Racing Slick Tire Hoosier 22” OD; 10
- 12 psi

Max Fluctuation ~14 0 Max Fluctuation ~7 0 Max Fluctuation ~10 0Attorney
- Client Privileged and Confidential 

### Off Road Vehicle Division



# A fter filtering, lateral acceleration is still noisy
4 

# 2Hz Filtered Lateral Acceleration Plots
OEM Tire Carlise PXT 26 ” OD; 10
- 12 psi Automotive Tire Kingstar Centum SK72 26 ” OD; 10
- 12 psi Racing Slick Tire Hoosier 22” OD; 10
- 12 psi



## 2Hz

6 Hz As the tires get smoother, lateral acceleration increases and noise decreasesAttorney
- Client Privileged and Confidential 

### Off Road Vehicle Division



# Even with smooth tires and filtering, understeer plots are not desirable
5 

# Filtered Understeer Plots

2Hz

6 Hz OEM Tire Carlise PXT 26 ” OD; 10
- 12 psi Automotive Tire Kingstar Centum SK72 26 ” OD; 10
- 12 psi Racing Slick Tire Hoosier 22” OD; 10
- 12 psi



### As the tires get smoother, the understeer plot is less chaoticAttorney
- Client Privileged and Confidential 

### Off Road Vehicle Division

6 

# Driver input is a source of error and noise. It improves with smoother tires.

• By using the Polaris proposed fixed steer test, the driver steering input is completely eliminated, removing that source of error 

# Lateral acceleration is also a source of error even after it has been highly filtered. It improves with smoother tires.

• Lateral acceleration is not an acceptable pass/fail metric for testing vehicles with off
- road tires 

# Summary
#### § 80.935 Station clock.

Each station subject to this subpart must have a working clock or timepiece readily available to the operator.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 173 (Thursday, September 7, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 52797]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7484]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Decision To Evaluate a Petition To Designate a Class of Employees 
at Bethlehem Steel Corporation, Buffalo, NY, To Be Included in the 
Special Exposure Cohort

AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of 
Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) gives notice 
as required by 42 CFR 83.12(e) of a decision to evaluate a petition to 
designate a class of employees at the Bethlehem Steel Corporation, 
Buffalo, New York, to be included in the Special Exposure Cohort under 
the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 
2000. The initial proposed definition for the class being evaluated, 
subject to revision as warranted by the evaluation, is as follows:
    Facility: Bethlehem Steel Corporation.
    Location: 10 inch Bar Mill and blooming Mill.
    Job Titles and/or Job Duties: Millwrights, welders, electricians, 
bricklayers, carpenters, all maintenance, testers, rollers, 
supervisors, crane operators, hookers, clean-up crews, grinders.
    Period of Employment: 1949-1952.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Elliott, Director, Office of 
Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational 
Safety and Health, 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, OH 
45226, Telephone 513-533-6800 (this is not a toll-free number). 
Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#abe4e8eaf8ebe8efe885ece4fd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="450a060416050601066b020a13">[email protected]</span></a>.

John Howard,
Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 06-7484 Filed 9-6-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-19-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Iomega 2007 Corporate Bonus Plan



 Exhibit 10.25 
  
 Iomega 2007 Corporate Bonus Plan 
  
 Background for Plan 
  

	 	•	 	 For Fiscal Year 2007, the Board of Directors has recognized the need to provide an incentive to employees to facilitate the goal to return the company to sustained
profitability and instill a culture of individual accountability. 


  

	 	•	 	 The Board of Directors further recognized: 


  

	 	•	 	 Employment agreements with certain employees to provide bonus metrics each fiscal year, and 


  

	 	•	 	 The benefits of a simplified plan with operating profitability metrics that focus all participants, regardless of level or geographic location, on the
company’s profit goals 


  
 2007 Corporate Bonus Plan

  
 Plan Structure: 
  

	 	•	 	 Executive and non-executive employees participate in the same Plan 


  

	 	•	 	 Plan is based on the Annual Operating Income goals 


  

	 	•	 	 Payout is based on corporate metrics only 


  

	 	•	 	 The Plan has two payout points, with a linear slope 


  

	 	•	 	 75% payout for a threshold achievement 


  

	 	•	 	 100% payout for threshold or higher achievement 


  

	 	•	 	 Linear slope between 75% and 100% 


  

	 	•	 	 No accelerators beyond the 100% payout 


  

	 	•	 	 Annual plan period 


  
 Administrative Details 
  

	 	•	 	 Payout calculations will occur after audit review, Board review and public announcement of the 2007 fiscal year results 


  

	 	•	 	 Any payments would generally occur in early February 


  

	 	•	 	 Commissioned sales employees are not eligible 


  

	 	•	 	 For participants employed by Iomega for only part of the fiscal year, participation is pro-rated based on hire date or approved leave of absence



  

	 	•	 	 Must be employed by Iomega on the date of payout to receive any bonus 










	 	•	 	 Bonus may not be paid to those on a formal performance improvement plan 


  

	 	•	 	 Company can modify or discontinue Plan at its sole discretion at any time
Editorial Note on Part 11
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 11 appear at 67 FR 38208, June 3, 2002.

§ 11.11 Notice of violation. ( a ) A notice of violation (hereinafter “notice”), shall be issued by the Director and served personally or by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, upon the person believed to be subject to a civil penalty (the respondent). The notice shall contain: ( 1 ) A concise statement of the facts believed to show a violation,
( 2 ) a specific reference to the provisions of the statute or regulation allegedly violated, and
( 3 ) the amount of penalty proposed to be assessed. The notice may also contain an initial proposal for compromise or settlement of the case. The notice shall also advise the respondent of his right to file a petition for relief pursuant to § 11.12, or to await the Director's notice of assessment.
( b ) The respondent shall have 45 days from the date of the notice of violation in which to respond. During this time he may: ( 1 ) Undertake informal discussions with the Director;
( 2 ) Accept the proposed penalty, or the compromise, if any, offered in the notice;
( 3 ) File a petition for relief; or
( 4 ) Take no action, and await the Director's decision, pursuant to § 11.13.
( c ) Acceptance of the proposed penalty or the compromise shall be deemed to be a waiver of the notice ef assessment required by § 11.14, and of the opportunity for a hearing. Any counter offer of settlement shall be deemed a rejection of the proposed offer of compromise.
No. 11-9977.

#### Moeller *v.*Weber, Warden.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.