alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order filed May 28, 2015 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00936-CR

____________

DARRYL KENT AUTHORLEE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 185th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 240766

ORDER

Appellant’s appointed counsel, Kelly Ann Smith, filed a brief in which she

concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 

1396 (1967). On March 31, 2015, we informed counsel that in order to comply 

with Anders, the Court of Criminal Appeals now requires counsel notify appellant

of his right to access the appellate record and provide him with a form motion for 

pro se access to the appellate record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2014). Counsel was requested to provide the court with an amended 
transmittal letter notifying appellant of his right to access the appellate record and 

to provide a form motion for pro se access to the appellate record. An example of 

a form motion was attached. The court requested counsel to file the amended 

transmittal letter within 10 days.

As of this date, no response has been filed. Accordingly, we order counsel 

to provide the court with an amended transmittal letter notifying appellant of his 

right to access the appellate record and to provide a form motion for pro se access 

to the appellate record within 10 days of the date of this order. If counsel fails to 

comply with Kelly, her brief may be stricken and the appeal abated for 

appointment of new counsel.

PER CURIAM
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Income  Partners  1990-A,  Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of operations con-
tained in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         424,196
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  325,413
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               758,078
<PP&E>                                         6,725,723
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,388,963)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,325,842
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          69,462
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,974,987
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,325,842
<SALES>                                        1,075,986
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,091,008
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  569,116<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                413,869
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            413,869
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   413,869
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         122,226
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,736,761
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,224,000)
<INVENTORY>                                 19,124,200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            34,560,250
<PP&E>                                       9,532,908
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,630,506)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              52,003,072
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       24,943,482
<BONDS>                                     14,965,950
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    49,540,782
<OTHER-SE>                                (37,447,110)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                52,003,072
<SALES>                                     74,719,701
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            74,719,701
<CGS>                                       51,643,223
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               31,866,317
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (208,529)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,319,501
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (10,900,811)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (10,900,811)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (10,900,811)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.12)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4979 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4979

   To require the administrative agency responsible for adjudicating 
 claims under the workers' compensation provisions of title 5, United 
  States Code, to select board certified physicians to provide second 
                               opinions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 17, 1994

Mr. Kreidler (for himself, Mr. Murphy, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, Mr. 
Barlow, Mr. Martinez, Mr. Oberstar, Mr. Jacobs, Mrs. Unsoeld, Ms. Eddie 
Bernice Johnson of Texas, Mr. Torres, Mr. Vento, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Synar, 
 and Mr. Johnston of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the administrative agency responsible for adjudicating 
 claims under the workers' compensation provisions of title 5, United 
  States Code, to select board certified physicians to provide second 
                               opinions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PHYSICIANS PROVIDING SECOND OPINIONS.

    The administrative agency to which the Secretary of Labor has 
delegated the authority to adjudicate claims made under the workers' 
compensation provisions of title 5, United States Code, shall only 
select physicians who have been certified by a board of medical 
specialties to provide second opinions in connection with such claims.
                                 <all>
```
1

IEER Differential

Additional Work on Gas Furnace IEER Differential

• Gas furnace pressure drop based on product literature: Carrier, Trane, 

Lennox. Furnace pressure drop information not provided for other brands.

• For some products, gas furnace pressure drop is directly listed.

• For others, calculate difference between no-heat product ESP and gas-heat 

ESP for the rated air flow rate and identical fan speed (rpm).

• For key nominal capacities (previously selected for adapter curb analysis), 

determine typical gas furnace pressure drop:

– Determine gas furnace pressure drop for available models.

– Average over available models at each nominal capacity for each manufacturer 

(e.g. low, high, highest efficiency). Drop highest efficiency in averaging if the 

pressure drop is unusually low.

– Average the manufacturer averages for each nominal capacity.

– Average the nominal capacity averages for each class.

• Apply gas pressure drop of the class to IEER calculations developed during 

the engineering analysis to determine IEER impact.
2

Gas Furnace Pressure Drop

Average Furnace Pressure Drop [in WG]

Capacity Shipment 

Percentage Mfgr 1 Mfgr 2 Mfgr 3 Nominal 

Capacity Average

6 20.8% 0.07 0.13 0.09 0.09

7.5 18.2% 0.11 0.10 0.07 0.09

8.5 16.4% 0.17 0.14 0.10 0.14

10 13.8% 0.19 0.20 0.13 0.17

12.5 9.4% 0.20 0.24 0.04 0.16

15 5.0% 0.12 0.19 0.05 0.12

17.5 3.7% 0.16 0.28 0.07 0.17

20 3.3% 0.19 0.24 0.07 0.17

25 2.6% 0.27 0.38 0.10 0.25

27 2.3% - 0.11 0.06 0.09

30 1.8% 0.39 0.24 0.10 0.24

35 1.1% 0.05 0.36 0.11 0.17

40 0.4% 0.05 0.48 0.09 0.21

45 0.4% 0.05 - - 0.05

50 0.4% 0.05 0.86 0.23 0.38

55 0.4% - 1.85 0.16 1.01

60 0.4% - 1.23 0.17 0.70

Average gas furnace pressure drop developed based on equal 

manufacturer market share and shipment distribution by 

capacity used for curb adapter analysis.

Equipment 

Class

Average Furnace 

Pressure Drop [in WG]

Small 0.12

Large 0.15

Very large 0.25
3

IEER Differential

• Recalculate IEER for the selected energy modeling units based 

on class average gas furnace pressure drop. 

• Increased indoor fan power base on fan power tables.

7.5-ton 15-ton 30-ton

EL IEER Difference EL IEER Difference EL IEER Difference

Baseline_single comp. -0.18 Baseline -0.41 Baseline -0.31

Baseline_dual comp. -0.22 Path-1-EL-1 -0.34 Path-1-EL-1 -0.36

Path-1-EL-1 -0.32 Path-2 EL1 -0.20 Path-2 EL1 -0.18

Path-2 EL1 -0.23 Path-1-EL-2 -0.36 Path-1-EL-2 -0.58

Path-1-EL-2 -0.20 Path-2 EL2 -0.16 Path-2 EL2 -0.13

Path-2 EL2 -0.26 EL2.5 -0.23 Path-1 EL2.5 -0.51

EL2.5 -0.13 EL-3 -0.22 Path-2 EL2.5 -0.08

EL-3 -0.13 EL-3.5 -0.21 EL-3 -0.14

EL-3.5 -0.10 EL-4 -0.28 EL-4 -0.19

EL-4 -0.36 EL-5 -0.33 EL-5 -0.29

EL-5 -0.14 Average -0.27 Average -0.28

Average -0.21 Max -0.16 Max -0.08

Max -0.10 Min -0.41 Min -0.58

Min -0.36 Standard Deviation 0.08 Standard Deviation 0.17

Standard Deviation 0.08

Note: IEER differential is the absolute value difference for IEER, 

not difference by percentage.
#### § 95.347 Automatic control.

Operation of Personal Radio Services stations under automatic control is prohibited, unless otherwise allowed for a particular Personal Radio Service by rules in the subpart governing that specific service. *See, e.g.,* §§ 95.1747, 95.2347, 95.2547, 95.3347.

[82 FR 43871, Sept. 20, 2017]
.bootstrap-tagsinput {
  background-color: #fff;
  border: 1px solid #ccc;
  box-shadow: inset 0 1px 1px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.075);
  display: inline-block;
  padding: 4px 6px;
  color: #555;
  vertical-align: middle;
  border-radius: 4px;
  max-width: 100%;
  line-height: 22px;
  cursor: text;
}
.bootstrap-tagsinput input {
  border: none;
  box-shadow: none;
  outline: none;
  background-color: transparent;
  padding: 0 6px;
  margin: 0;
  width: auto;
  max-width: inherit;
}
.bootstrap-tagsinput.form-control input::-moz-placeholder {
  color: #777;
  opacity: 1;
}
.bootstrap-tagsinput.form-control input:-ms-input-placeholder {
  color: #777;
}
.bootstrap-tagsinput.form-control input::-webkit-input-placeholder {
  color: #777;
}
.bootstrap-tagsinput input:focus {
  border: none;
  box-shadow: none;
}
.bootstrap-tagsinput .tag {
  margin-right: 2px;
  color: white;
}
.bootstrap-tagsinput .tag [data-role="remove"] {
  margin-left: 8px;
  cursor: pointer;
}
.bootstrap-tagsinput .tag [data-role="remove"]:after {
  content: "x";
  padding: 0px 2px;
}
.bootstrap-tagsinput .tag [data-role="remove"]:hover {
  box-shadow: inset 0 1px 0 rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.2), 0 1px 2px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.05);
}
.bootstrap-tagsinput .tag [data-role="remove"]:hover:active {
  box-shadow: inset 0 3px 5px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.125);
}
Sullivan,

No. 4541.

#### Arnold L. Tancreti *v.*Irving Mandinach.

Argued December 4, 1956.

Decided February 28, 1957.

*452
      *Robert A. Jones*for the plaintiff, furnished no brief.

*Leahy & Denault {Mr. Leahy*orally), for the defendant.

Lampeón, J.

There was evidence that, previous to this employment, plaintiff worked in Franklin as a meatcutter at a salary of $87 per week for a five-day week, for a partnership of which the defendant was a member. He also received on that job from the other partner $12 per week in cash for his room and toward payment of his meals. When plaintiff discussed with the partners in Franklin the offer made him by the defendant to work for him in Lebanon he was told “it will be a promotion and to your advantage. You will get more money.” Plaintiff testified that the defendant agreed to pay him in Lebanon $95 per week for a five-day week. However he worked 6 days a week for 24 weeks and testified he was assured by the defendant that “it would be made up to me” but it never was. This evidence warranted a finding that plaintiff was owed $456.

When the Lebanon store opened it was operated by the defendant as an individual as “Mandy Beef Co.” On October 19, 1954, a corporation was formed under the name “Mandy Beef Co., Inc.” and defendant testified it operated the business thereafter. It became bankrupt August 1, 1955. Plaintiff testified he never was told by defendant that he was no longer working for him but for a corporation. He did not remember the presence of the word “Inc.” on the checks received from defendant in payment of his wages after October 19, 1954. Defendant admitted there was no change made after incorporation in the name “Mandy Beef Co.” which appeared on a sign outside the building in which the store was located.

The existence of a corporation begins when its record of organization is deposited in the office of the Secretary of State and the required fee paid. RSA 294:17. However what will be deemed sufficient notice of incorporation to affect the rights of a creditor such as plaintiff depends on the circumstances. 8 Fletcher, Cyclopedia Corporations (Perm, *ed.)*s. 4020. Where, as in this case, there was no change in the place of business or its mode of operation, it was an issue of fact for the Court whether plaintiff was chargeable with notice or knowledge of the incorporation. *Id.*By its verdict the Court necessarily found against the defendant on this issue *(Lupien*v. *Rousseau,*98 N. H. 459) and he therefore *453continued liable to the plaintiff for wages due him during the entire period of his employment. See *Zollar*v. *Janvrin,*47 N. H. 324, 327; *Deering*v. *Flanders,*49 N. H. 225, 228.

Defendant’s motions were properly denied and the order is

*Judgment on the verdict.*

All concurred.
059P16

#### State v. Gary Roger Thomson

Defs PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-390)

Denied
Exhibit 21

Subsidiaries of Del Monte Foods Company

Del Monte Corporation is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Del Monte Foods Company. The entities listed
below are direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries of Del Monte Corporation.



|                                                    |  |                              
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Subsidiaries                                        |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|Del Monte Argentina                                 |  | Argentina                    
|Hi Continental Corporation                          |  | California                   
|College Inn Foods (1)                               |  | California                   
|Star-Kist Samoa, Inc.                               |  | California                   
|DLM Foods Canada Corp.                              |  | Canada                       
|Del Monte Colombiana, S.A.                          |  | Colombia                     
|Contadina Foods, Inc.                               |  | Delaware                     
|Marine Trading (Pacific), Inc.                      |  | Delaware                     
|The Meow Mix Company, LLC                           |  | Delaware                     
|Meow Mix Decatur Production I LLC                   |  | Delaware                     
|S&W Fine Foods, Inc.                                |  | Delaware                     
|Star-Kist Mauritius                                 |  | Delaware                     
|Del Monte Ecuador DME C.A.                          |  | Ecuador                      
|Galapesca, S.A.                                     |  | Ecuador                      
|Panapesca Fishing, Inc.                             |  | Panama                       
|Star-Kist International, S.A.                       |  | Panama                       
|Del Monte Peru, S.A.                                |  | Peru                         
|Del Monte Andina                                    |  | Venezuela                    
|Industrias Citrícolas de Montemorelos, S.A. de C.V. |  | Mexico                       

---

|(1) | Formerly known as Oak Grove Trucking Company
|--- | --------------------------------------------
#### §§ 95.2965-95.2969 [Reserved]
No. 11-167.

#### Sarkis *v.*Lajcak et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
§ 76.71 Scope of application. ( a ) The provisions of this subpart shall apply to any corporation, partnership, association, joint-stock company, or trust engaged primarily in the management or operation of any cable system. Cable entities subject to these provisions include those systems defined in § 76.5(a), all satellite master antenna television systems serving 50 or more subscribers, and any multichannel video programming distributor. For purposes of the provisions of this subpart, a multichannel video programming distributor is an entity such as, but not limited to, a cable operator, a BRS/EBS provider, a direct broadcast satellite service, a television receive-only satellite program distributor, or a video dialtone program service provider, who makes available for purchase, by subscribers or customers, multiple channels of video programming, whether or not a licensee. Multichannel video programming distributors do not include any entity which lacks control over the video programming distributed. For purposes of this subpart, an entity has control over the video programming it distributes, if it selects video programming channels or programs and determines how they are presented for sale to consumers. Nothwithstanding the foregoing, the regulations in this subpart are not applicable to the owners or originators (of programs or channels of programming) that distribute six or fewer channels of commonly-owned video programming over a leased transport facility. For purposes of this subpart, programming services are “commonly-owned” if the same entity holds a majority of the stock (or is a general partner) of each program service.
( b ) *Employment units.* The provisions of this subpart shall apply to cable entities as employment units. Each cable entity may be considered a separate employment unit; however, where two or more cable entities are under common ownership or control and are interrelated in their local management, operation, and utilization of employees, they shall constitute a single employment unit.
( c ) *Headquarters office.* A multiple cable operator shall treat as a separate employment unit each headquarters office to the extent the work of that office is primarily related to the operation of more than one employment unit as described in paragraph (b) of this section.
[50 FR 40855, Oct. 7, 1985, as amended at 58 FR 42250, Aug. 9, 1993; 69 FR 72045, Dec. 10, 2004]
No. 11-5087.

#### Adams *v.*Corcoran, Superintendent, Woodbourne Correctional Facility.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in
Registration Statement Nos: 333-61054, 333-43790, 333-112361, and 333-12179 each on From S-3, and Registration Statement Nos. 333-82283 and 333-16935 each on Form S-8, of our report dated April 6, 2007 (except for Note 17, of which the
date is May 18, 2007) relating to the consolidated financial statements of BSML Inc. (formerly Britesmile, Inc.) and Subsidiaries as of December 30, 2006 and for fiscal year then ended appearing in this Annual report on Form 10-K/A of BSML
Inc. and Subsidiaries for fiscal year ended December 30, 2006.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Stonefield Josephson Inc.
|                             
|CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 
|Los Angeles , California     
|May 18, 2007
No. 11-5753.

#### Moses *v.*North Carolina.

Gen. Ct. Justice, Super. Ct. Div., Forsyth County, N. C. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Report of Houston Operating Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Low Chin Sin President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Low Chin Sin
-------------------------
Low Chin Sin
President and
Chief Financial Officer

August 12, 2003
#### §§ 95.2581-95.22583 [Reserved]
#### §§ 54.517-54.518 [Reserved]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6438
AMIL ALFRED DINSIO, SR., a/k/a Amil Dinsio, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JAMES WHITTINGTON, Vice President of United Carolina Bank; THE UNITED CAROLINA BANK; RAY BERNARD, F.B.I. Agent; CARL HORN, III, U.S. Magistrate, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CA-94-375-3-P) Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 6, 1996 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Amil Alfred Dinsio, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Bentford E. Martin, BLAIR, CONAWAY, BOGRAD & MARTIN, Charlotte, North Carolina; James Michael Sullivan, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his second motion for reconsideration of the court's dismissal of his civil action for violations of Fed. R. Civ. P. 11. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dinsio v. Whittington , No. CA-94-375-3-P (W.D.N.C. Sept. 5, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED