alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       2,913,985
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  469,228
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,383,213
<PP&E>                                       1,790,194
<DEPRECIATION>                                 354,649
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,818,758
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,103,360
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,255
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,697,143
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,818,758
<SALES>                                        541,690
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               541,690
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,698,662
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (54,979)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,101,993)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,101,993)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,101,993)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.17)


</TABLE>
#### § 95.2385 WMTS RF exposure evaluation.

Mobile and portable devices as defined in §§ 2.1091(b) and 2.1093(b) of this chapter operating in the WMTS are subject to radio frequency radiation exposure requirements as specified in §§ 1.1307(b), 2.1091, and 2.1093 of this chapter, as appropriate. Applications for equipment authorization of WMTS devices must contain a statement confirming compliance with these requirements. Technical information showing the basis for this statement must be submitted to the Commission upon request.

[85 FR 18151, Apr. 1, 2020]
#### § 13.46 Maintenance of records.

From the date of issuance of the permit, the permittee shall maintain complete and accurate records of any taking, possession, transportation, sale, purchase, barter, exportation, or importation of plants obtained from the wild (excluding seeds) or wildlife pursuant to such permit. Such records shall be kept current and shall include names and addresses of persons with whom any plant obtained from the wild (excluding seeds) or wildlife has been purchased, sold, bartered, or otherwise transferred, and the date of such transaction, and such other information as may be required or appropriate. Such records shall be legibly written or reproducible in English and shall be maintained for five years from the date of expiration of the permit. Permittees who reside or are located in the United States and permittees conducting commercial activities in the United States who reside or are located outside the United States must maintain records at a location in the United States where the records are available for inspection.

[39 FR 1161, Jan. 4, 1974, as amended at 42 FR 32377, June 24, 1977; 54 FR 38150, Sept. 14, 1989; 72 FR 48446, Aug. 23, 2007]
EX-31

       RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION OF GARY BORGLUND

                 RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION

I, Gary Borglund, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Avery
Sports Turf, Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) [omitted pursuant to extended compliance period] for
the small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)  [omitted pursuant to extended compliance period]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter
(the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5.  I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's
auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small
business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the small
business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.


Dated: May 23, 2005                    /s/ Gary Borglund
                                       Gary Borglund, President
No. 11-8896.

#### Leavitt *v.*San Jacinto Unified School District.

Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist., Div. 2. Certiorari denied.
# Phantom 3 Pre-Flight Inspection Check List

Pre-Flight Check List

ο Visual inspection for defects

ο Batteries fully charged and checked - Transmitter, UAS, iPad, iPhone, approved/compatible device

ο Props tightened and locked

ο SD card in camera

ο Lens cap removed (As necessary)

ο Antennae up and parallel

ο Transmitter turned on (press once, release, then press and hold for 3 seconds)

ο Ensure Transmitter is in P Mode

ο UAS turned on (press once, release, then press and hold for 3 seconds)

ο Flick the transformation switch on transmitter up and down 4 times quickly to convert from travel mode to flight mode or use the app

ο DJI Pilot app quit and restarted, no other running apps on iPad

ο Tap bar at top of app (Safe to Fly GPS) for full status

ο Maps are cached (move the map around, zoom in an out)

ο Minimum return height adjusted (check for tallest object and set accordingly)

ο UAS placed in safe launch and recover position

ο Home point reprogrammed via app

ο Area clear of people / obstructions

Flight Check List

ο Hover close for 20 seconds. Look / Listen for defects

ο Confirm expected stick operation

ο Monitor battery power

ο Monitor signal strength

ο Keep line-of-sight with UAS

o Ensure area/zone of intended flight path is clear of other aerial traffic.

o Ensure area/zone of intended flight path is clear of any electrical/power lines

o Ensure atmospheric conditions are optimal for safe operation of UAV/UAS

o Select a safe zone to “ditch” the UAV/UAS in the event an emergency landing is required
No. 11-5893.

#### Walker *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Apollo Medical Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter   ended April 30, 2011
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kyle Francis, Chief Financial
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section  1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,
whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.



|Dated:  April 9, 2012 | By: | Kyle Francis           
|--------------------- | --- | -----------------------
|                      |     |                        
|                      |     | Chief Financial Officer
Editorial Note on Part 74
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 74 appear at 64 FR 4055, Jan. 27, 1999.

§ 74.633 Temporary authorizations. ( a ) Special temporary authority may be granted for TV broadcast auxiliary station operation which cannot be conducted in accordance with § 74.24. Such authority will normally be granted only for operations of a temporary nature. Where operation is seen as likely on a continuing annual basis, an application for a regular authorization should be submitted.
( b ) A request for special temporary authority for the operation of a television broadcast auxiliary station must be made in accordance with the procedures of § 1.931(b) of this chapter.
( c ) All requests for special temporary authority of a television broadcast auxiliary station must include full particulars including: licensee's name and address, facility identification number of the associated broadcast station(s) (if any), call letters of the television broadcast STL or intercity relay station (if assigned), type and manufacturer of equipment, effective isotropic radiated power, emission, frequency or frequencies proposed for use, commencement and termination date and location of the proposed operation, and purpose for which request is made including any particular justification.
( d ) A request for special temporary authority shall specify a channel or channels consistent with the provisions of § 74.602: *Provided,* That in the case of events of wide-spread interest and importance which cannot be transmitted successfully on these frequencies, frequencies assigned to other services may be requested upon a showing that operation thereon will not cause interference to established stations: *And provided further,* That in no case will a television auxiliary broadcast operation be authorized on frequencies employed for the safety of life and property.
( e ) When the transmitting equipment utilized is not licensed to the user, the user shall nevertheless have full control over the use of the equipment during the period it is operated.
( f ) Special temporary authority to permit operation of a TV auxiliary broadcast station of any class pending FCC action on an application for regular authority will not normally be granted.
(Sec. 318, 48 Stat. 1089, as amended; 47 U.S.C. 318)
[28 FR 13720, Dec. 14, 1963, as amended at 47 FR 9221, Mar. 4, 1982; 47 FR 55937, Dec. 14, 1982; 50 FR 23710, June 5, 1985; 52 FR 10570, Apr. 2, 1987; 58 FR 19775, Apr. 16, 1993; 68 FR 12769, Mar. 17, 2003]
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 99

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Judiciary Plaza
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     In a letter dated March 29, 2002, our independent public accountants,
Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen"), represented to us that their audit of the
consolidated financial statements of Case Credit Corporation and subsidiaries as
of December 31, 2001 and for the year then ended was subject to Andersen's
quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide
reasonable assurance that their engagement was conducted in compliance with
professional standards and that there was appropriate continuity of Andersen
personnel working on the audit, availability of national office consultation and
availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Andersen to conduct the
relevant portions of the audit.

CASE CREDIT CORPORATION

By: /s/ Mario Ferla
    ----------------------
    Mario Ferla

    Senior Vice President
    and Chief Financial
    Officer

March 29, 2002

                                       56
§ 73.61 AM directional antenna field strength measurements. ( a ) Each AM station using a directional antenna with monitoring point locations specified in the instrument of authorization must make field strength measurements as often as necessary to ensure that the field at each of those points does not exceed the value specified in the station authorization. Additionally, stations not having an approved sampling system must make the measurements once each calendar quarter at intervals not exceeding 120 days. The provision of this paragraph supersedes any schedule specified on a station license issued prior to January 1, 1986. The results of the measurements are to be entered into the station log pursuant to the provisions of § 73.1820.
( b ) If the AM license was granted on the basis of field strength measurements performed pursuant to § 73.151(a), partial proof of performance measurements using the procedures described in § 73.154 must be made whenever the licensee has reason to believe that the radiated field may be exceeding the limits for which the station was most recently authorized to operate.
( c ) A station may be directed to make a partial proof of performance by the FCC whenever there is an indication that the antenna is not operating as authorized.
[50 FR 47054, Nov. 14, 1985, as amended at 73 FR 64560, Oct. 30, 2008]
EXHIBIT 11

   STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE - (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               For the Three Months Ended         For the Nine Months Ended
                                                        June 30,                           June 30,
                                             -------------------------------    -------------------------------
(dollars in thousands except per share           2004             2003              2004             2003
               amounts)
----------------------------------------     --------------    -------------    --------------   --------------
<S>                                            <C>               <C>               <C>               <C>
Net earnings (loss)                                $ 783             $ 440            $ (778)           $1,004

Effect of conversion of preferred                    101               100               304               300
securities

Diluted earnings (loss)                              884               540              (474)            1,304

Weighted average common shares
outstanding                                    3,012,434         3,012,434         3,012,434         3,012,434

Effect of conversion of preferred
securities (1)                                 1,371,429         1,371,429         1,371,429         1,371,429

Common stock equivalents due to
dilutive effect of stock options (1)              30,011            30,059            36,355            28,839

Total weighted average common shares
and common share equivalents
outstanding (1)                                4,413,874         4,413,922         4,420,218         4,412,702

Basic earnings (loss) per common share             $0.26             $0.15            $(0.26)           $ 0.33

Diluted earnings (loss) per common
share                                              $0.20             $0.12            $(0.26)           $ 0.30

(1) Effect of conversion of preferred securities and dilutive effect of stock options are not considered in the
calculation of earnings per share for the nine months ended June 30, 2004 because the impact is antidilutive.

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 12, 2019

s0605 

# Order

Clerk June 12, 2019

158953

RACHEL C. BROWN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 158953

COA: 342616

Ingham CC: 17

- 000185

- AA

CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 10, 2018

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Geographic index ofenvironmental articles.**
 
SuDoc Number:EP 1.23/6:600

Item Number:0431-J (online)
CGP systemNumber:001120892
 
1991 | 1992 | 1993 | 1994
 
May 7, 2020
**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS**

In connection withthe Report of United Industries Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert L. Caulk,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.
| Dated: August 16, 2004 | By:    | /s/ Robert L.  Caulk                                           |
|-----------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                        | Name:  | Robert L. Caulk                                                |
|                        | Title: | President, Chief Executive Officer and   Chairman of the Board |

 

In connection withthe Report, I, Daniel J. Johnston, Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to myknowledge:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.
| Dated: August 16, 2004 | By:    | /s/ Daniel J.  Johnston                                                                                                             |
|-----------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                        | Name:  | Daniel J. Johnston                                                                                                                  |
|                        | Title: | Executive Vice President, Chief   Financial Officer and Director   (Principal Financial Officer and   Principal Accounting Officer) |

 

----
#### § 73.6000 Definitions.

For the purpose of this subpart, the following definition applies:

*Locally produced programming* is programming produced within the predicted noise-limited contour (*see* § 73.619(c)) of a Class A station broadcasting the program or within the contiguous predicted noise-limited contours of any of the Class A stations in a commonly owned group.

Note to § 73.6000:

*See Report and Order,* In the Matter of Establishment of a Class A Television Service, MM Docket No. 00-10, released April 4, 2000; *Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration,* In the Matter of Establishment of a Class A Television Service, MM Docket No. 00-10, released April 13, 2001; *Report and Order,* In the Matter of Elimination of Main Studio Rule, MB Docket No. 17-106, released October 24, 2017.

[82 FR 57884, Dec. 8, 2017, as amended at 89 FR 7263, Feb. 1, 2024]
No. 11-5621.

#### Kendrick *v.*Hardy, Warden.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 68.5 Waivers.

The Commission may, upon the application of any interested person, initiate a proceeding to waive the requirements of § 68.4(a)(1) with respect to new telephones, or telephones associated with a new technology or service. The Commission shall not grant such a waiver unless it determines, on the basis of evidence in the record of such proceeding, that such telephones, or such technology or service, are in the public interest, and that (a) compliance with the requirements of § 68.4(a)(1) is technologically infeasible, or (b) compliance with such requirements would increase the costs of the telephones, or of the technology or service, to such an extent that such telephones, technology, or service could not be successfully marketed. In any proceeding under this section to grant a waiver from the requirements of § 68.4(a)(1), the Commission shall consider the effect on hearing-impaired individuals of granting the waiver. The Commission shall periodically review and determine the continuing need for any waiver granted pursuant to this section.

[54 FR 21430, May 18, 1989]