09/17/2010 16:08 FAX 2024335142 

v.<' xj / i.ux u go^V/O PAA 4- 3 2:2/ i00 7 

FAA 

ANM-7 

* DMS 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

« 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

IS 

19 

20 

21 

22 

2;) 

24 

25 

26 

27 

29 

29 

30 

31 

32 

33 

34 

35 

36 

37 

76 

3S 

40 

41 

42 

43 

44 

45 

4^ 

47 

48 

49 

SO 

51 

52 

53 

Scott R. Morris 

F AA Office of Regional Counsel 

1601 Lind Ave., SW 

Rcnton, Washington 98055-4099 

I'elephone: 425/227-1417 

Facsimile: 425/227-1007 

21002/004 

@1002 

't'RARTMENT OF 

iANSPORIATION 

>'ET OPERATIONS 

:EP?0 A R:03 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

J. RANDOLPH BABBITT, Administrator, 

Federal Aviation Admuiistration, 

COMI'LAINANT, 

vs. 

SkyWest Airlines 

RESPONDENT 

FAA DOCKET NUMBER CPl 0NM0OO2 

FAA Case No. 2009NM060048 

DMS No. FAA-2010-0312 

MOTION TO TAKE lUDICUL NOTICE 

JUDGL GOODWIN 

TO: Administrative Law Judge: 

Complainant, tlirough her undersigned counsel, pursuant to Rules of Practice 13.21 S(a) and FRE 

201, hereby moves ^ t the A.LJ take judicial notice of the following: 

1. The Admioistrator's published civil penally guidelines contained in FAA Order 2150.313, 

specifically the IbUowing pTovisions: 

a. Appendix B [page B-31 defines a Group I air carrier for purposes of sanction as one 

operating under Part 121 or part 135, witli an annual operating revenue of 

$100,000,000 or more. 

b. Appendix B, page B-3 

The sanction range for a GROUP I - large business concern are as follows: 

Maximum SI 8,750-$25,000 

Moderate $10,000-$! 8,749 

Minimum $2,000-59,999 

c. Figure B-\-c(2) provides a minimxun sanction range for Operations contrary to ops 

specs - technical Noncompliance. 

Motion to Tike Judicial Notice 

FAA. UockeC CP10NM0002 

Page 1 of 3 

Scott R. Morris 

KAA Accorney 
09/17/2010 1G:08 FAX 2024935142 

u»/ii)/^uiy uo.ua hAA i'l' i 'I'll 1007 

FAA 

ANM- 7 

•> DMS 21003/004 

1^003 

1 

2 

A 

S 

€ 

7 

e 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

1,5 

16 

17 

IB 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

29 

30 

31 

32 

33 

34 

35 

3e 

37 

33 

39 

40 

43 

42 

43 

44 

45 

46 

47 

48 

49 

50 

51 

52 

S3 

d. Figure B-l-c(3) provides a moderate to maximum sanction range for Operation 

contrary to ops specs - likely potential or actual adverse effect on safe operation. 

c. Figure B-l-h(2) provides a moderate to maximum sanction for failure to perform or 

improper maintenance. 

f. Figure B-l-k(l) provides a moderate to maximum sanction range for any violation of 

Part 121, subpart U concerning dispatch and release rules. 

g. Figure B-1 -1 (2) provides a moderate to maximum sanction range for non-conformity 

to type certificate that may have, or has, adverse effect on safe operation. 

h. Figure B-1 -o( 1) provides a maximum sanction range for improperly returning aircraft 

to service. 

i. Chapter 7, paragraph 4(i) [page 7-7] provides in part: "To the extent that this 

document conflicts with FAA decisionmaker decisions published before this 

document's issuance, the sanction guidance in this order supersedes those decisions." 

(emphasis added) 

j . Chapter 7, paragraph 6(c) [page 7-10] provides in part: "under 49 U.S.C, § 

46301(a)(2), if a violation is a continuing one, each day the violation continues, or 

each flight for which the violation was committed, constitutes a separate offense. 

49 U.S.C. §46301(a)(2) provides that: "A separation violation occurs under this subsection 

for each day the violation continues or, if applicable, for each flight involving the violation." 

(internal cross-reference not applicable) . 

DATliD this 15 day of September 2010. 

SCOTT R. MORRIS 

FAA Attorney 

MoCion to Take Judicial Notice 

FAA Docket CP10NM0002 

Pagfe 2 or 3 

Scott R. Morrii 

FAA Accorney 
09/17/2010 16:08 FAX 2024935142 

« i ' JH// i«J. U M0.U 3 TAA 42 3 'iZ'l 100 7 

FAA 

A^fM-7 

+ DMS @|004/004 

121004 

1 

3 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

a 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

IS 

16 

17 

le 

15 

20 

21 

23 

23 

24 

2S 

26 

27 

26 

29 

30 

31 

32 

33 

34 

35 

36 

37 

38 

39 

40 

41 

42 

43 

41 

45 

46 

47 

48 

49 

50 

51 

S2 

53 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certily that the foregoing Complainant's Motion to Take Judicial Notice has been served 

via facsimile and certified mail - Return Receipt Requested this dale, to the following: 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Office of hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Rm El2-320 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: 202.366.2139 

FAX: 202.366.7536 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue SW 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbuj Wright Building - Suite 2W1000 

FAX: 202.493,5020 

Michael L. Dworldn 

465 California Street, Suite 210 

San Francisco, CA 94104-1808 

TEL: 405.421.2500 

FAX: 405.954.4676 

Dated this 15 day of September 2010, 

'<^ . 

lON €. 

JA"NA STEPHENSON 

Office of Regional Counsel (ANM-7) 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Ave. SW 

Rcnlon, WA 98057 

425.227.2164 

MoLion to Take Judici;*! Motice 

FJ>A DocVat CP10NM0002 

Page 3 of 3 

SCOtr R. Morris 

FAA ACtome y