alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Export-Import Bank of the United States

# ACTION:

Notice of an Open Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Export-Import Bank of the United States. 

# Time and Place:

Thursday, September 14, 2006 at 9:30 a.m. The meeting will be held at Ex-Im Bank in Room 1143, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571.

# Open Agenda Item:

PEFCO Secured Note Issues (Resolution).

# Public Participation:

The portion of the meeting, which relates to the above item, will be open to public participation. Attendees that are not employees of the Executive Branch will be required to sign in prior to the meeting.

# For Further Information Contact:

Office of the Secretary, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571 (Telephone No. 202-565-3957).

Howard A. Schweitzer,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 06-7602 Filed 9-7-06; 3:46 pm]

BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                        MERCURY INTERACTIVE CORPORATION
 
                  COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON
                          AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARES
                          (PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED)
 
                    (in thousands, except per share amounts)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
                                                                  31,
                                                         ----------------------
                                                          1996   1995     1994
                                                         ------ -------  ------
<S>                                                      <C>    <C>      <C>
Weighted average common shares outstanding.............. 15,908  13,947  12,610
Weighted average common equivalent shares from dilutive
 options (1)............................................    655      --     727
                                                         ------ -------  ------
Weighted average common shares and equivalents.......... 16,563  13,947  13,337
                                                         ====== =======  ======
Net income (loss)....................................... $4,626 $(5,251) $5,049
                                                         ====== =======  ======
Net income (loss) per share............................. $ 0.28 $ (0.38) $ 0.38
                                                         ====== =======  ======
</TABLE>
--------
(1) Common equivalent shares are excluded from the computation if their effect
    is anti-dilutive.
No. 10-1337.

#### American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers *v.*United States et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certio-rari denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Exhibit 10.8


SIXTH
AMENDMENT


This Sixth Amendment, effective as of the date set forth above the
signatures of the parties below, pertains to the Amended and Restated Exclusive
Patent License Agreement (“Agreement 4908236”), effective on November 1, 2002,
as subsequently amended by a First Amendment on November 15, 2002, a Letter
Agreement on September 12, 2003, a Letter Agreement on October 22, 2003, a
Second Amendment on November 19, 2003, a Third Amendment on April 2, 2004, a
Fourth Amendment on July 17, 2004, and a Fifth Amendment on August 5, 2006 by
and between the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (“M.I.T.”) and Momenta
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“COMPANY’)


WHEREAS, COMPANY no longer plans to commercialize the technology
included in MIT Case Number 9085, “Aerosol Administration of Heparin to the
Lungs,” by Dongfang Liu, Yiwei Qi, Ram Sasisekharan, Mallikarjun Sundaram and
Ganesh Venkataraman;


WHEREAS, M.I.T. agrees to remove this case from Agreement 4908236
without penalty to COMPANY;


NOW, THEREFORE, M.I.T. and COMPANY hereby agree to remove this case and
all future obligations relating to this case from Agreement 4908236.


All
other terms and conditions of Agreement 4908236 shall remain unchanged.


The
AMENDMENT EFFECTIVE DATE is January 10, 2007.


Agreed to for:


	
  MASSACHUSETTS INTITUTE OF

  TECHNOLOGY

  	
   

  	
  MOMENTA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

  
	
  By 

  	
       /s/ Lita Nelsen

  	
   

  	
  By 

  	
  /s/ Susan K. Whoriskey

  	
   

  
	
  Name 

  	
  Lita L. Nelsen,

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name 

  	
  Susan K. Whoriskey, Ph.D.

  	
   

  
	
  Title 

  	
  Director, Technology Licensing Office

  	
   

  	
  Title Vice President, Licensing & Business

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Development
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Hassan N. Natha, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Jones Soda Co.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: 

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared; 

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles; 

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): 

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Dated as of May 12, 2008
#### § 80.79 Inspection of ship station by a foreign Government.

The Governments or appropriate administrations of countries which a ship visits may require the license of the ship station or ship earth station to be produced for examination. When the license cannot be produced without delay or when irregularities are observed, Governments or administrations may inspect the radio installations to satisfy themselves that the installation conforms to the conditions imposed by the Radio Regulations.
[No. 3210.]

#### Horace Treadwell *v.*The State.

Burglary—Indictment for burglary, to be sufficient, must describe, with all of its statutory ingredients, the felony or theft intended to be committed. In charging the entry with intent to take the property therein being, the indictment in this ease was insufficient, because it failed to charge that such intended theft was “ without the consent of the owner,” an element of theft necessary to be alleged and proved in order to support a conviction.

Appeal from the District Court of San Jacinto. Tried below before the Hon. E. Hobby.

The conviction in this case was for the burglary of the house of A. R. Day, with the intent to commit theft, and the penalty imposed was a term of two years in the penitentiary.

*644In connection with other questions raised on appeal, besides the validity, of the indictment, this court, at a previous day of the term, considered the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction. The judgment was affirmed without a written opinion. The opinion which follows was rendered on a motion for rehearing.

*Walton, Hill & Walton,*for the motion.

*J. H. Burts,*Assistant Attorney Q-eneral, *contra.*

Willson, Judge.

In affirming the judgment in this case we overlooked a fatal defect in the indictment. It fails to allege that the entry of the house was with the intent to take the property therein being *without the consent of the owner of said property.*In other words, in charging the intended theft, the essential allegation “without the consent of the owner” is omitted.

It is well séttled that in an indictment for burglary “the particular felony or theft intended to be committed must be described with all its statutory ingredients.” *(Webster*v. *The State,*9 Texas Ct. App., *75; Rodrigues*v. *The State,*12 Texas Ct. App., 552; *Reed*v. *The State,*14 Texas Ct. App., 662.) One of the statutory ingredients of theft is that the property must be taken “without the consent” of the owner thereof, and this want of consent must be alleged and proved in order to sustain a conviction for the offense. (Penal Code, Art. 724; *Williams*v. *The State,*12 Texas Ct. App., 394.)

Because of this fatal defect in the indictment, the motion for rehearing is granted, the judgment of affirmance is set aside, and the judgment of conviction is reversed and the prosecution is dismissed.

*Ordered accordingly.*

Opinion delivered June 27, 1884.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. AP-76,781 & AP-76,782

EX PARTE JERALD THOMPSON BEAVER, JR., Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. CR-08D-070 & CR-08D-071 IN THE 222ND DISTRICT COURT

FROM DEAF SMITH COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty to tampering

with physical evidence and possession of a controlled substance and was placed on probation for

seven years in each count. His probation was later revoked, and he was sentenced to seven years’

imprisonment. He did not appeal his convictions.

Applicant contends that a hearing on his motion for shock probation was scheduled after the

trial court’s jurisdiction had expired. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 42.12, § 6. He contends that trial
2

counsel rendered ineffective assistance. The trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law 

and recommended that we grant. Relief is granted. The sentences in cause numbers CR-08D-070 and

CR-08D-071 in the 222nd District Court of Deaf Smith County are set aside, and Applicant is

remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Deaf Smith County to answer the allegations in the State’s

motion to revoke Applicant’s probation. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench warrant

within 10 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the TexasDepartment ofCriminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: April 25, 2012

Do Not Publish
§ 73.4250 Subliminal perception. ( a ) See Public Notice, FCC 74-78, dated January 24, 1974. 44 FCC 2d, 1016; 39 FR 3714, January 29, 1974.
( b ) See FCC Information Bulletin, “Subliminal Projection”, dated November 1977.
[44 FR 36389, June 22, 1979]
No. 10-10806.

#### Woodberry *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
§ 87.19 Basic eligibility. ( a ) *General.* Foreign governments or their representatives cannot hold station licenses.
( b ) *Aeronautical enroute and aeronautical fixed stations.* The following persons cannot hold an aeronautical enroute or an aeronautical fixed station license. ( 1 ) Any alien or the representative of any alien;
( 2 ) Any corporation organized under the laws of any foreign government;
( 3 ) Any corporation of which more than one-fifth of the capital stock is owned of record or voted by aliens or their representatives or by a foreign government or its representative, or by a corporation organized under the laws of a foreign country; or
( 4 ) Any corporation directly or indirectly controlled by any other corporation of which more than one-fourth of the capital stock is owned of record or voted by aliens, their representatives, or by a foreign government or its representatives, or by any corporation organized under the laws of a foreign country, if the Commission finds that the public interest will be served by the refusal or revocation of such license.
[53 FR 28940, Aug. 1, 1988, as amended at 61 FR 55581, Oct. 28, 1996]
§ 17.50 General. ( a ) Whenever a species which is not Endangered or Threatened closely resembles an Endangered or Threatened species, such species may be treated as either Endangered or Threatened if the director makes such determination in accordance with section 4(e) of the Act and the criteria of paragraph (b) of this section. After the Director has made such determination in accordance with the notification procedures specified in the Act, such species shall appear in the list in § 17.11 (Wildlife) or § 17.12 (Plants) with the notation “(S/A)” (similarity of appearance) in the “Status” column, following either a letter “E” or a letter “T” to indicate whether the species is being treated as Endangered or Threatened.
( b ) In determining whether to treat a species as Endangered or Threatened due to similarity of appearance, the Director shall consider the criteria in section 4(e) of the Act, as indicated below: ( 1 ) The degree of difficulty enforcement personnel would have in distinguishing the species, at the point in question, from an Endangered or Threatened species (including those cases where the criteria for recognition of a species are based on geographical boundaries);
( 2 ) The additional threat posed to the Endangered or Threatened species by the loss of control occasioned because of the similarity of appearance; and
( 3 ) The probability that so designating a similar species will substantially facilitate enforcement and further the purposes and policy of the Act.
[42 FR 32377, June 24, 1977, as amended at 81 FR 51605, Aug. 4, 2016]
Request for Information Discovery Bay Studios (FAA-2015-3409) 

9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA) 

Dear Mr. Chance: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. 

FAA−2015−3409). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your 

petition.

 Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s)(i.e., fixed-wing, rotorcraft, lighter-than-air) for the 

proposed UAS operation. The description(s) should include the maximum weight (including payload). This 

information can be located in the aircraft manual(s).

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov. Once your 

information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary 

information), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If

you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by November 27, 

2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999 .

 

FAA Office of Rulemaking 

Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2015 11:23 AM 

To: captainchance@gmail.com
§ 73.875 Modification of transmission systems. The following procedures and restrictions apply to licensee modifications of authorized broadcast transmission system facilities. ( a ) The following changes are prohibited: ( 1 ) Those that would result in the emission of signals outside of the authorized channel exceeding limits prescribed for the class of service.
( 2 ) Those that would cause the transmission system to exceed the equipment performance measurements prescribed in § 73.508.
( b ) The following changes may be made only after the grant of a construction permit application on FCC Form 318. ( 1 ) Any construction of a new tower structure for broadcast purposes, except for replacement of an existing tower with a new tower of identical height and geographic coordinates.
( 2 ) Any change in station geographic coordinates, including coordinate corrections and any move of the antenna to another tower structure located at the same coordinates.
( 3 ) Any change in antenna height more than 2 meters above or 4 meters below the authorized value.
( 4 ) Any change in channel.
( c ) The following LPFM modifications may be made without prior authorization from the Commission. A modification of license application (FCC Form 319) must be submitted to the Commission within 10 days of commencing program test operations pursuant to § 73.1620. For applications filed pursuant to paragraph (c)(1) of this section, the modification of license application must contain an exhibit demonstrating compliance with the Commission's radiofrequency radiation guidelines. In addition, for applications filed solely pursuant to paragraphs (c)(1) or (2) of this section, where the installation is on or near an AM tower, as defined in § 1.30002, an exhibit demonstrating compliance with § 1.30003 or § 1.30002, as applicable, is also required. ( 1 ) Replacement of an antenna with one of the same or different number of antenna bays, provided that the height of the antenna radiation center is not more than 2 meters above or 4 meters below the authorized values. Program test operations at the full authorized ERP may commence immediately upon installation pursuant to § 73.1620(a)(1).
( 2 ) Replacement of a transmission line with one of a different type or length which changes the transmitter operating power (TPO) from the authorized value, but not the ERP, must be reported in a license modification application to the Commission.
( 3 ) Changes in the hours of operation of stations authorized pursuant to time-share agreements in accordance with § 73.872.
[65 FR 7640, Feb. 15, 2000, as amended at 78 FR 66298, Nov. 5, 2013]
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350


In connection with the Annual Report of ION Geophysical Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2013 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gregory J. Heinlein , Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:


|   |                                                                                                                                      
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: March 28, 2014/s/ Gregory J. HeinleinGregory J. HeinleinSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
# Intention To Enter Into a Free Trade Agreement With Colombia

Consistent with section 2105(a)(1)(A) of the Trade Act of 2002, I have notified the Congress of my intention to enter into a free trade agreement with the Republic of Colombia.

                    Consistent with section 2105(a)(1)(A) of that Act, this notice shall be published in the                     **Federal Register.**

[FR Doc. 06-7221

Billing code 3190-01-M
- AZ 1972
§ 90.667 Grandfathering provisions for incumbent licensees. ( a ) These provisions apply to all 900 MHz SMR licensees who obtained licenses or filed applications for secondary sites on or before August 9, 1994 (“incumbent licensees”), as well as to all 900 MHz SMR licensees who obtained authorizations pursuant to § 90.173(k). An incumbent licensee's service area shall be defined by its originally-licensed 40 dBu field strength contour. Incumbent licensees are permitted to add new or modify transmit sites in this existing service area without prior notification to the Commission so long as their original 40 dBu field strength contour is not expanded.
( b ) Incumbent licensees operating at multiple sites may, after grant of MTA licenses has been completed, exchange multiple site licenses for a single license, authorizing operations throughout the contiguous and overlapping 40 dBu field strength contours of the multiple sites. Incumbents exercising this license exchange option must submit specific information for each of their external base sites after the close of the 900 MHz SMR auction.
( c ) Applications in the 900 MHz SMR service for secondary sites filed after August 9, 1994 shall be authorized on a secondary, non-interference basis to MTA licensee operations. No secondary sites shall be granted on this basis in an MTA once the MTA licensee has been selected.
[60 FR 48918, Sept. 21, 1995]