alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          928
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       7795
<OTHER-SE>                                     (7723)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               4,474
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,474)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,474)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,474)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.00)



</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
             THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B)
          OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)


     Pursuant  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a)
and  (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Robert
L.  Long,  President  and  Chief  Executive Officer of Transocean Inc., a Cayman
Islands  corporation  (the  "Company"),  hereby  certify, to my knowledge, that:

     (1)  the  Company's  Quarterly  Report  on  Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
          September 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
          of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
          Company.

Dated:  November 12, 2003            /s/  Robert  L.  Long
                                     ------------------------------------------
                                     Name:  Robert  L.  Long
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer


     The  foregoing  certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter  63  of  Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of
the  Report  or  as  a  separate  disclosure  document.

     A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to  Transocean  Inc. and will be retained by Transocean Inc. and
furnished  to  the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Veterans Affairs
 The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the Public Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Advisory Committee on CARES Business Plan Studies will meet as indicated below. The meetings are open to the public. Location
Date
TimeThe Shaw's Center, 1 Lexington Avenue, Brockton, MA 02301
September 18, 2006
10 a.m. until 5:15 p.m.VA Medical Center, 2250 Leestown Road Division, Auditorium, Building 1, Lexington, KY 40511
September 20, 2006
1 p.m. until 5 p.m.VA Medical Center, Walla Walla Theatre, 77 Wainwright Drive, Building 74, Walla Walla, WA
September 25, 2006
9 a.m. until 12 noon.
 The purpose of the Committee is to provide advice to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs on proposed business plans at those VA facility sites identified in May 2004 as requiring further study by the Capital Asset Realignment for Enhanced Services (CARES) Decision document. The objectives of the meetings in Brockton, MA and Lexington, KY are to communicate the Secretary's decision on the specific options to be evaluated and the timeframe for the completion of the studies. Additional presentations will focus on the VA-selected contractor's methodology and tools to evaluate the remaining options. The agendas will also accommodate public commentary on implementation issues associated with each option. Featured agenda items of the meeting in Walla Walla, WA include a discussion of the summary of the proposed space plan and siting of the new multi-specialty outpatient clinic on the VA Medical Center Walla Walla campus. Interested persons may attend and present oral or written statements to the Committee. For additional information regarding the meetings, please contact Mr. Jay Halpern, Designated Federal Officer, (00CARES), 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20024 by phone at (202) 273-5994, or by e-mail at 
                    *jay.halpern@hq.med.va.gov.* Dated: August 28, 2006. By direction of the Secretary. E. Philip Riggin, Committee Management Officer.


[FR Doc. 06-7386 Filed 8-31-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 27, 2012

t0124 

# Order

January 27, 2012

143780

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 143780 COA: 298299 Wayne CC: 09-011819-FH ANTHONY BROOKS, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 16, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal , we VACATE, as dicta, the portion of the judgment of the Court of Appeals that addressed the trial c ourt’s decision to upwa rdly depart from the sentencing guidelines. Becau se the Court of Appeals gran ted defendant a new trial, defendant’s challenge to his sentence was rendered moot. The Court of Appeals’ discussion of this issue also wrongly left th e impression that a departure sentence of life may only be imposed on a habitual offender when the sentencing o ffense is murder or a Class A felony. See MCL 769.12(1). We express no opinion, however, whether the

extent of the trial court’s senten cing departure was justified under People v Smith , 482 Mich 292 (2008). In all other respects, leav e to appeal is DENIED because we are not persuaded that the remaining question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

M ARILYN K ELLY , J., would deny leave to appeal.
No. 11-5903.

#### Mayes *v.*Maryland et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 10 (i) (E) 


DATE


Re: Option
granted under the Sterling Bancorp Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”)


Dear
Mr./Mrs./Ms. _______:


          This
will confirm the terms of the Option granted to you on ______________, under
the Plan, by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Sterling
Bancorp (this and other capitalized terms in this agreement have the meaning
given them under the Plan, except where otherwise indicated):


               (1)
The Option is nonqualified stock option for a total of _____ Shares, at an
exercise price of $____ per share, which shall become exercisable on the fifth
anniversary of the date of grant and shall remain exercisable for a term of ten
(10) years from the date of grant (subject, however, to earlier termination as
provided in Section 9 of the Plan).


               (2)
The Option may be exercised by written notice to Sterling Bancorp as to all
Shares as to which it is then exercisable or as to any portion thereof (but not
less than 100 Shares) and the purchase price shall be payable in cash or any
other property authorized pursuant to Section 8(a) of the Plan. The Option may
be exercised only by you, subject to the right of your estate or legal
representative to exercise to the extent permitted under the Plan.


               (3)
The number of shares subject to the Option and the Option price shall be
adjusted in accordance with the terms of Section 12 of the Plan.


PAGE 88







EXHIBIT 10 (i) (E)


               
(4) You agree that you will not dispose of any Shares acquired pursuant to the
Option except in accordance with the registration requirements of the
Securities Act of 1933 (including the exemptions thereunder) and that the Board
may condition the issuance of Shares on your execution of an appropriate
undertaking to such effect and may require the legending of the certificates
representing the Shares, as authorized by Section 20 of the Plan.


               (5)
The terms of this Option Agreement are subject to those of the Plan, which
shall control in the event of any conflict.


               Your
signature will confirm your acceptance of the Option and the terms set forth
above.



	
 

	
 


	
 

	
Very truly
  yours,


	
 

	
 


	
 

	
STERLING
  BANCORP


	
 

	
 


	
 

	
John C.
  Millman


	
 

	
President 


	
Accepted and
  Agreed:

	
 


	
 

	
 


	


	
 





PAGE 89
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-23-00522-CR

MELAYNA DIANE HOWARD

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

452nd District Court of Edwards County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2107

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 22, 2024
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5010 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5010

 To require that certain Government consumer information publications 
 that are distributed without charge include a statement that they are 
            financed by the taxpayers of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 21, 1994

   Mr. Bachus of Alabama (for himself, Mr. Dornan, and Mr. Franks of 
 Connecticut) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Government Operations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require that certain Government consumer information publications 
 that are distributed without charge include a statement that they are 
            financed by the taxpayers of the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STATEMENT REQUIRED FOR CERTAIN GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS.

    Any consumer information publication that--
            (1) is prepared by a department, agency, or other entity of 
        the executive branch of the Government; and
            (2) is distributed without charge;
shall contain a statement, prominently displayed on the cover or first 
page, as follows: ``The printing and distribution of this publication 
is financed by the taxpayers of the United States''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION.

    As used in this Act, the term ``consumer information publication'' 
means a publication distributed to the public for general educational 
and informational purposes.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
EXHIBIT 27.3
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          25,881
<SECURITIES>                                    15,406
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,363
<ALLOWANCES>                                       855
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                70,222
<PP&E>                                          17,713
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,942
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  91,843
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,050
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           111
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,972
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    91,843
<SALES>                                         72,814
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                72,814
<CGS>                                           25,837
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,837
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                45,217
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,465)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,225
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,080
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,096
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,096
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09
        

</TABLE>
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000866878
<NAME>                        ICON Cash Flow Partners, L.P., Series C
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         1,059,310
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5,319,572
<ALLOWANCES>                                     309,020
<INVENTORY>                                       46,961
<CURRENT-ASSETS> *                                     0
<PP&E>                                                 0
<DEPRECIATION>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6,643,704
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> **                               0
<BONDS>                                          994,354
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,691,747
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6,643,704
<SALES>                                        1,170,549
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,170,549
<CGS>                                              6,913
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 249,877
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (9,968)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        0
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     923,727
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          4.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          4.61
<FN>
*    The  Partnership  has  an  unclassified  balance  sheet  in  its  financial
     statements due to the nature of its industry.  A value of "0" was used for
     current assets and liabilities.

**   The  Partnership  has  an  unclassified  balance  sheet  in  its  financial
     statements due to the nature of its industry.  A value of "0" was used for
     current assets and liabilities.
</FN>

        


</TABLE>
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 15, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-00079-CV

____________

MARCUS MARQUIS PRUITT, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 180th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1201763

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from the December 15, 2011 denial of appellant’s motion for the 

return of seized property.

1

 The clerk’s record was filed February 9, 2012. No reporter’s 

record was taken in the court below. Appellant’s brief was due March 12, 2012, but it was 

 

1

 Appellant was convicted of possession of between four and 200 grams of cocaine with the intent to 

deliver and sentenced to thirty-five years in prison. See Pruitt v. State, 2011 WL 2120116, No. 

14-10-00357-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] May 24, 2011, pet. ref’d) (not designated for 

publication). This court affirmed his conviction. Id. According to his motion, $901 was seized from 

appellant when he was arrested, and the State has not instituted forfeiture proceedings. See Tex. Code 

Crim. Proc. art. 59.01—.14. Appellant seeks return of the money seized at his arrest. Cases under article 

59 proceed as civil actions. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 59.05(b).
2

not filed. On March 14, 2012, this court notified appellant that his brief was past due. 

Appellant did not file a brief, motion for extension of time to file his brief, or any other 

response to the court’s notice.

On April 17, 2012, this court issued an order stating that unless appellant filed a

brief on or before April 30, 2012, the court would dismiss the appeal for want of 

prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). Appellant filed no response. 

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Seymore, and McCally.
§ 14.121 Primary enclosures. ( a ) No more than one primate shall be transported in a primary enclosure. However, a mother and her nursing young being transported to the United States for medical treatment, an established male-female pair, a family group, a pair of juvenile animals that have not reached puberty, or other pairs of animals that have been habitually housed together may be shipped in the same primary enclosure. Primates of different species shall not be shipped together in the same enclosure.
( b ) A primary enclosure used to transport a primate shall be large enough to ensure that the animal has sufficient space to turn around freely in a normal manner, lie down, stand up (as appropriate for the species), and sit in a normal upright position without its head touching the top of the enclosure. However, a primate may be restricted in its movements according to professionally accepted standards of care when greater freedom of movement would constitute a danger to the primate or to its handler or other persons.
( c ) Except as provided in § 14.106(j), ventilation openings must be located on at least two walls of a primary enclosure. When the required ventilation openings are located on two opposite walls of the primary enclosure, these ventilation openings shall comprise at least 30 percent of the total surface area of the ventilated wall and be situated above the midline of the enclosure. If ventilation openings are located on all four walls of the enclosure, the openings on each wall shall comprise at least 20 percent of the total surface area of the wall and be situated above the midline of the primary enclosure.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1




The Board of Directors
Reddi Brake Supply Corporation and Subsidiaries

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements ((Form
S-8 No. 33-66462) pertaining to the Wesco Auto Parts Corporation 1992 Incentive
Stock Option Plan, (Form S-8 No. 33-44544) pertaining to the Wesco Auto Parts
Corporation 1991 Christmas Bonus Plan, and the Wesco Auto Parts Corporation
1991 Incentive Stock Option Plan, and the Wesco Auto Parts Corporation 1990
Incentive Stock Option Plan; (Form S-8 No. 33-71380) pertaining to the Wesco
Auto Parts Corporation Director's Stock Option Plans, Wesco Auto Parts
Corporation Software Consultants Stock Option Plan and the Wesco Auto Parts
Corporation Consultant's Compensation Plan; (Form S-3 No. 33-89810) pertaining
to shares of Common Stock being offered for sale pursuant to outstanding Class
C Warrants, outstanding Class D Warrants and offerings for sale by selling
shareholders; and (Form S-3 No. 33-98838) pertaining to shares of Common Stock
issuable upon conversion of outstanding 9.0% Adjustable Convertible
Subordinated Notes), of our report dated September 19, 1996, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Reddi Brake Supply Corporation and Subsidiaries
as of June 30, 1996 and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year ended June 30, 1996, and the
related schedule, which report appears in the June 30, 1996 annual report on
Form 10-K of Reddi Brake Supply Corporation and Subsidiaries.

Our report dated September 19, 1996 contains an explanatory paragraph that
states that the Company has suffered significant operating losses, used
$7,976,653 of cash in operations in fiscal 1996 and does not expect to be in
compliance with certain debt covenants in fiscal 1997 and has an accumulated
deficit of $26,685,249 as of June 30, 1996.  These matters raise substantial
doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern.  Managements'
plans in regard to these matters are also described in the notes to the
consolidated financial statements.  The consolidated financial statements do
not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this
uncertainty.



KPMG Peat Marwick LLP



Los Angeles, California
October 10, 1996