alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 14.131 Primary enclosures. ( a ) A primary enclosure that is not open on top shall have air inlets situated at heights that provide cross ventilation at all levels and that are located on all four sides of the enclosure. Such ventilation openings shall comprise not less than 20 percent of the total surface area of each side of the enclosure.
( b ) Straps, slings, harnesses, or other such devices used for body support or restraint when transporting marine mammals such as cetaceans or sirenians shall meet the following requirements: ( 1 ) The devices shall not prevent attendants from having access to the mammal to administer care during transportation;
( 2 ) The devices shall be equipped with sufficient padding to prevent trauma or injury at points of contact with the mammal's body;
( 3 ) Slings or harnesses shall allow free movement of flippers outside of the harness or sling;
( 4 ) The devices shall be capable of preventing the mammal from thrashing about and causing injury to itself, handlers, or other persons, but shall be designed so as not to cause injury to the mammal.
( c ) A primary enclosure used to transport marine mammals shall be large enough to assure the following: ( 1 ) A sea otter or polar bear has sufficient space to turn about freely with all four feet on the floor and to sit in an upright position, stand, or lie in a natural position;
( 2 ) A pinniped has sufficient space to lie in a natural position;
( 3 ) If a sling, harness, or other supporting device is used, there are at least 3 inches (7.5 centimeters) of clearance between any body part and the primary enclosure;
( d ) A marine mammal may be restricted in its movements according to professionally accepted standards of care when freedom of movement would constitute a danger to the animal or to handlers or other persons.
( e ) All marine mammals contained in a given primary enclosure shall be of the same species and be maintained in compatible groups. A marine mammal that has not reached puberty shall not be transported in the same primary enclosure with an adult marine mammal other than its mother. Socially dependent animals (e.g., siblings, mother, and offspring) transported in the same conveyance shall be allowed visual and, when appropriate for the species, olfactory contact. A female marine mammal shall not be transported in the same primary enclosure with any mature male marine mammal.
#### § 76.1601 Deletion or repositioning of broadcast signals.

A cable operator shall provide written notice to any broadcast television station at least 30 days prior to either deleting from carriage or repositioning that station.

[85 FR 71854, Nov. 12, 2020]
§ 76.70 Exemption from input selector switch rules. ( a ) In any case of cable systems serving communities where no portion of the community is covered by the predicted Grade B contour of at least one full service broadcast television station, or non-commercial educational television translator station operating with 5 or more watts output power and where the signals of no such broadcast stations are “significantly viewed” in the county where such a cable system is located, the cable system shall be exempt from the provisions of § 76.66. Cable systems may be eligible for this exemption where they demonstrate with engineering studies prepared in accordance with § 73.686 of this chapter or other showings that broadcast signals meeting the above criteria are not actually viewable within the community.
( b ) Where a new full service broadcast television station, or new non-commercial educational television translator station with 5 or more watts, or an existing such station of either type with newly upgraded facilities provides predicted Grade B service to a community served by a cable system previously exempt under paragraph (a) of this section, or the signal of any such broadcast station is newly determined to be “significantly viewed” in the county where such a cable system is located, the cable system at that time is required to comply fully with the provisions of § 76.66. Cable systems may retain their exemption under paragraph (a) of this section where they demonstrate with engineering studies prepared in accordance with § 73.686 of this chapter or other showings that broadcast signals meeting the above criteria are not actually viewable within the community.
[54 FR 25716, June 19, 1989]
Employment Agreement dated May 9, 2006



 Exhibit 10.39 
 May 9, 2006 
 Roger Chelemedos 
 116 Oak Road

 Orinda, California 94563 
 Dear Roger: 
 It is a pleasure to confirm your promotion to Senior Vice President, Finance, Controller and Treasurer. This promotion is based on the following mutual understanding:

  

	1.	You will receive an annual salary of $305,000 payable in equal bi-weekly amounts of $11,730.77. 

  

	2.	Your bonus target will be 50% of your base annual salary, which will be prorated this year for the time spent in your new and former roles. 

  

	3.	Subject to the approval of the Board of Directors’ Compensation Committee, you will receive a grant of 2,300 shares of restricted common stock which will vest equally over four
years. 

  

	4.	You will be eligible to participate in the Performance Based Restricted Stock Grant program currently being implemented for senior executives at Longs Drugs. Subject to the approval
of the Board of Directors’ Compensation Committee, you will be granted a total award value that is consistent with those amounts granted to other participants at the Senior Vice President level. This award will be subject to vesting and other
requirements. Details of the Plan and the Plan goals for FY07 will be provided under separate cover. 

  

	5.	Subject to the approval of the Board of Directors’ Compensation Committee, you will be provided the Company’s current standard agreement for termination benefits in the
event of change in corporate control, as provided to other Company Executive and Senior Vice Presidents. 

 Roger, on behalf of Steve and
myself, we are pleased to extend to you this promotion and we look forward to our continued relationship. 
 Sincerely, 
 LONGS DRUG STORES CALIFORNIA, INC. 
  

	
	  

	Linda Watt
	Senior Vice President, Human Resources
Letter of Agreement



 Exhibit 10.37 
 [LETTERHEAD OF ROCHE PHARMACEUTICALS] 
 Dr. Dani Bolognesi 
 Trimeris, Inc. 
 3500 Paramount Parkway 
 Morrisville, NC 27560 
 U.S.A. 
 Basel, 13 March 2007 
 Re: Roche/Trimeris Research Agreement dated
January 1, 2000 (as amended) 
 Dear Dani: 
 Roche elects
to Opt Out pursuant to Article 5 of the Third Amendment to the Research Agreement and Accord. Accordingly, the rights and obligations set forth in Article 5(a) through (e) are activated. In addition, Trimeris will have the right to develop and
commercialize TRI-1144 as it chooses. Trimeris will pay to Roche a royalty of one percent (1%) of Net Sales of all products containing TRI-1144 in every country in which Trimeris owns an unexpired patent that claims the making, using, selling,
offering for sale, or importing of TRI-1144, up to an aggregated total on royalties set at twenty-four million dollars (US$24,000,000). 
 Pursuant to
Paragraph 5 of the Third Amendment to the Research Agreement and Accord, Roche retains its right to develop up to five (5) Penzberg peptides subject to Trimeris’ right to co-develop any such peptide accepted by Roche into development
before December 31, 2008. 
 Roche and Trimeris will share all costs associated with the TRI-1144 joint research program for 2007, through the date of
execution of this letter. 
 This letter is being provided in duplicate originals. If Trimeris agrees with the above paragraph, please sign and return one
original. 
  

	
	Best regards,
	
	 /s/ William M. Burns

	William M. Burns
	
	Agreed and Accepted:
	
	Trimeris, Inc.
	
	 /s/ Dani P. Bolognesi

	Dani P. Bolognesi, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer
No. 11-5706.

#### Stewart *v.*Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit 10.3**

 

**CONSULTING AGREEMENT**

 

This CONSULTING AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) dated as of June 11, 2003 between TOYS “R” US, INC. a Delaware Corporation (the“Corporation”) and CHARLES LAZARUS (“Lazarus”). 

 

**RECITALS**

 

WHEREAS, the Corporation and Lazarusare parties to an Employment Agreement originally dated March 14, 1978 and subsequently amended by Agreements dated November 20, 1979, February 2, 1981, March 23, 1982, April 10, 1984, May 20, 1988, March 14, 1989 and June 10, 1998 (collectivelyreferred to as the “Employment Agreement”). 

 

WHEREAS,the Employment Agreement expires as of January 31, 2004; 

 

WHEREAS, Lazarus continues to serve as Chairman Emeritus of the Corporation and will continue in this role beyond January 31, 2004; 

 

WHEREAS, the advice of Lazarus continues to be a valuable resource for the Corporation; and 

 

WHEREAS, in consideration of Lazarus continuing to serve as Chairman Emeritus of the Corporation and continuing to provideadvice to the Corporation, it is fair and reasonable for the Corporation to continue to provide Lazarus with certain corporate benefits after January 31, 2004. 

 

NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed as follows: 

 

1. The Corporation shall provide Lazarus with, or reimburse him for the expense of, a car and driver when he is in the New York metropolitan area or onbusiness for the Corporation; 

 

2. The Corporation shall provideLazarus with office and secretarial services at its corporate headquarters; 

 

3. The Corporation shall reimburse Lazarus, upon submission of appropriate record of incurrence, his reasonable business expenses and disbursement incurred in the course of the performance of his duties as ChairmanEmeritus; and 

 

4. Lazarus will be entitled to continuation ofhealth benefits, for life, under the Corporation’s health plans at a level commensurate with such benefits as are generally made available to the Corporation’s executive officers. 

5. It is the intention of the parties that all benefits provided to Lazarus under the terms of thisAgreement shall continue for as long as Lazarus requires such benefits. 

 

6. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New Jersey. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. 

 

TOYS “R”US, INC.

By:
 
/s/ Christopher K. Kay

Name: Christopher K. Kay

Title: Executive Vice President –

Operations and General Counsel

CHARLES LAZARUS

/s/ Charles Lazarus
#### § 95.2569 MedRadio field strength measurements.

Compliance with MedRadio equivalent isotropic radiated power (M-EIRP) limits can be determined by measuring the radiated field strength from the transmitter type, in accordance with the rules in this section.

(a) Radiated field strength values corresponding to the M-EIRP limits in [§ 95.2567](/on/2024-09-20/title-47/section-95.2567) are given in the table in this paragraph, for an open area test site, and for a test site equivalent to free space, such as a fully anechoic test chamber. Field strength is measured at a distance of 3 meters from the equipment under test.

| M-EIRP limit | Open area (mV/m) | Free space (mV/m) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 mW | 115.1 | 57.55 |
| 25 μW | 18.2 | 9.1 |
| 250 nW | 1.8 | 0.9 |
| 100 nW | 1.2 | 0.6 |

(b) Compliance with the maximum transmitter power requirements in [§ 95.2567](/on/2024-09-20/title-47/section-95.2567) is based on measurements using a peak detector function and measured over an interval of time when transmission is continuous and at its maximum power level. In lieu of using a peak detector function, measurement procedures that have been found to be acceptable to the FCC in accordance with [§ 2.947 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-20/title-47/section-2.947) may be used to demonstrate compliance.

(c) For a MedRadio transmitter intended to be implanted in a human body, radiated emissions and M-EIRP measurements for transmissions by stations authorized under this section may be made in accordance with an FCC-approved human body simulator and test technique. Guidance regarding dielectric parameters for the tissue-equivalent material can be found in the Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) Laboratory Division Knowledge Database (KDB).

[[82 FR 41104](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/82-FR-41104), Aug. 29, 2017, as amended at [86 FR 53566](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/86-FR-53566), Sept. 28, 2021]
### SERVED: July 10, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF JOSEPH D. BARBERA FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA 2013- 1083
ORDER ON COMPLAINANT'S MOTIONS By prior Orders we denied the Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter "Complainant") Motion for Decision and Motion to Reconsider our Order Denying Motionto Deem Allegations Admitted and Dismiss Appeal. Complainant has filed a Motion to Strike Response to Motion for Summary Judgment and Response to Respondent's Motion to Compel Discovery. Neither of Respondent's pleadings referred to in Complainant's Motion have been presented to the court. This is a formal Administrative Hearing. We expect Respondent to comply with all the applicable rules. IfRespondent fails to comply with applicable rules, Respondent may be sanctioned including, but not limited to, allegations in the Complaint may be deemed admitted; and/orRespondent may be precluded from introducing any evidence at the hearing other than his own testimony; and/or Respondent's Request for Hearing may be dismissed; and/or a Default Judgment may be entered against Respondent in the full amount ofthe fine requested by the Agency in its Complaint. 1 ?:**?f--~** ·- .;_**·-.~**Paragraphs #2 and #3 ofthe Procedural Order are amended as follows: WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDEREDto adhere to the following procedural schedule: 1. On orbefore October 1, 2014, the parties shall conclude all discovery including, but not limited to, depositions, document production, responses to production requests and/or'interrogatories. Iftheparties cannot resolve a discovery dispute they shall submitthe dispute to the undersigned for resolution in a timelymanner; 2. Theparties shall bepreparedto presentthis case at a hearing on orafter October 1, 2014, subjectto the availability ofcourtroom facilities. The specific date arid time for the hearing will beforthcoming ina separate Order.

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative LawJudge Attachment

- Service List

2SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington; DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1000 1
Joseph D. Barbera, Respondent 14706N.E. Erickson Dr. LaCenter, WA 98629-4405 TEL: NOT PROVIDED FAX: NOT PROVIDED David F. Shayne, Complainant's Counsel Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 Federal Aviation Administration 1601- Lind Ave., S.W. Renton, WA 98057 TEL: 425-227-1847 FAX: 425-227-1007 ONE COPY

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 · U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2013-1083 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 3
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Hans Boge the Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer ofKlondike Star Mineral Corporation, Inc. (the "Company") in compliance with 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, hereby certify that, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSBfor the period ended August 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company. 

  

|   | *Date: October 9, 2006_* | *Signed:* |  **                                |
|--------|--------------------------|-----------|-----------------------------------------|
|   |                     |      |                                    |
|   |                     | *Name:*   | *Hans Boge*                             |
|   |                     | *Title:*  | *Chief Executive Officer and principal* |
|   |                     |      | *financial officer*                     |
#### §§ 95.747-95.755 [Reserved]
#### DELAWARE, LACKAWANNA & WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, CROSS-PETITIONER, v. CITY OF HOBOKEN, ET ALS., DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS, CROSS-RESPONDENTS.

See same case below: 16 *N. J. Super.*543.

*Mr. Theodore D. Parsons*and *Mr. Benjamin G. Van Tine*for the petitioner State of New Jersey.

January 28, 1952.

Granted.
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0932Life Cycle of Labor TraffickingLabor trafficking is a crime that involves compelling or coercing a person to provide labor or services and affects persons of all ages, races, genders, and nationalities. Labor traffickers often prey on those with vulnerable life circumstances and economic hardships. Labor trafficking victims can be found in legal and illegal labor industries, as well as hidden behind closed doors and in plain view. This toolkit provides resources for law enforcement, businesses, communities, and other stakeholders to identify, respond to, and address labor trafficking and to support its victims and survivors. This resource was developed as part of the Partnerships to Address Labor Trafficking project. For more information and additional resources, visit https://cops.usdoj.gov/labor_trafficking.By Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS Office), Institute for Intergovernmental Research (IIR)Categories: Nonviolent CrimeLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0932Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Jan 2021Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 00:45 (UTC-5) in 1.02 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5161 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5161

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 to permit the 
 prompt sharing of timber sale receipts of the Forest Service and the 
                       Bureau of Land Management.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTION REGARDING SHARING OF TIMBER SALE 
              RECEIPTS.

    (a) Forest Service.--Section 13982(b)(1) of the Omnibus Budget 
Reconciliation Act of 1993 (Public Law 103-66; 107 Stat. 681; 16 U.S.C. 
500 note) is amended by inserting ``out of any money in the Treasury 
not otherwise appropriated,'' before ``for the benefit of counties''.
    (b) Bureau of Land Management.--Section 13983(b)(1) of the Omnibus 
Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (Public Law 103-66; 107 Stat. 682; 43 
U.S.C. 1181f note) is amended by inserting ``, out of any money in the 
Treasury not otherwise appropriated,'' after ``shall make payments''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 4, 1994

            Attest

                                                                 Clerk.
                                     

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5161

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 to permit the 
 prompt sharing of timber sale receipts of the Forest Service and the 
                       Bureau of Land Management.
```
No. 11-5669.

#### Brown *v.*Florida.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
§ 13.23 Amendments of permits. ( a ) *Permittee's request.* Where circumstances have changed so that a permittee desires to have any condition of his permit modified, such permittee must submit a full written justification and supporting information in conformity with this part and the part under which the permit was issued.
( b ) *Service amendment.* The Service reserves the right to amend any permit for just cause at any time during its term, upon written finding of necessity, provided that the amendment of a permit issued under § 17.22(b) or (c) of this subchapter will be consistent with the requirements of § 17.22(b)(5) or (c)(5) of this subchapter and amendment of a permit issued under § 17.32(b) or (c) of this subchapter will be consistent with the requirements of § 17.32(b)(5) or (c)(5) of this subchapter.
( c ) *Change of name or address.* A permittee is not required to obtain a new permit if there is a change in the legal individual or business name, or in the mailing address of the permittee. A permittee is required to notify the issuing office within 10 calendar days of such change. This provision does not authorize any change in location of the conduct of the permitted activity when approval of the location is a qualifying condition of the permit.
[54 FR 38148, Sept. 14, 1989, as amended at 64 FR 32711, June 17, 1999; 89 FR 26093, Apr. 12, 2024]