alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The Chimene Law Firm 

15203 Newfield Bridge Ln. 

Sugar Land, TX. 77498 

michelec@airmail.net

February 2, 2015 

Hon. Jeffrey D. Kyle 

Clerk 

Third Court of Appeals, Austin, TX 

P.O. Box. 12547 

Austin, TX. 78711 

 Re: Case No. 03-13-00025-CV; Scarbrough et al. v. Purser, et. al.; 

On appeal to the Third Court of Appeals, Austin, TX. 

Dear Sir: 

 Our Motion to Consider Newly-Discovered Evidence in Sanctions Testimony 

has been pending before the Court for approximately two months and Mr. 

Scarbrough is facing a disciplinary hearing on the same matter before the State Bar 

on February 19, 2015. It was very scary to have my home broken into and my notes 

for this appeal erased; my clients have also been traumatized by their involvement 

with this case. I fully understand if the Court wishes to carry this Motion along with 

the case, but I would appreciate your bringing the Motion to the panel’s attention so 

that we can know that at least it will receive consideration. I have been an appellate 

attorney for fully twenty-two years in Texas, and I have never had the experience I 

have had with this case, through no fault of my clients. 

 Thank you. 

 Regards, 

 /s/ MB CHIMENE 

 Michele Barber Chimene 

 TBN 04207500 

 COUNSEL FOR APPELLANTS 

ACCEPTED

03-13-00025-CV

4010904

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

2/3/2015 9:20:17 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 RECEIVED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 2/3/2015 9:20:17 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A true and correct copy of this letter has been served via ECF and email on 

Daryl Moore, 1005 Heights Blvd, Houston, TX. 77008, daryl@heightslaw.com on 

Feb. 3rd, 2015, as certified by my hand below.

_______/s/ MB CHIMENE_______
§ 18.26 Collection of certain dead marine mammal parts. ( a ) Any bones, teeth or ivory of any dead marine mammal may be collected from a beach or from land within 1 ⁄ 4 of a mile of the ocean. The term “ocean” includes bays and estuaries.
( b ) Marine mammal parts so collected may be retained if registered within 30 days with an agent of the National Marine Fisheries Service, or an agent of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
( c ) Registration shall include ( 1 ) the name of the owner,
( 2 ) a description of the article to be registered and
( 3 ) the date and location of collection.
( d ) Title to any marine mammal parts collected under this section is not transferable, unless consented to in writing by the agent referred to in paragraph (b) of this section.
[39 FR 7262, Feb. 25, 1974, as amended at 51 FR 17981, May 16, 1986]
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ANGELA MARIE WYNN, )

)

 Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-809

)

WILLIAM W. PICKAVANCE, III, )

)

 Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed June 29, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee

County; Lee A. Schreiber, Judge.

Susan Hartmann Swartz of Law Office of 

Stanley R. Swartz, Bradenton, for Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

SILBERMAN, LUCAS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meetings.

                    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and                           ( print page 51629)                        the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.                

*Name of Committee:*                         National Eye Institute, NEI Conference Application Review.                    

*Date:*                         August 31, 2006.                    

*Time:*                         4:30 p.m. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Bethesda, MD 20892; (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Houmam H. Araj, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Extramural Research, National Eye Institute; 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 1300, Bethesda, MD 20892; 301-451-2020;                         *haraj@mail.nih.gov*.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.867, Vision Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 23, 2006.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 06-7226 Filed 8-29-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4141-01-M
Case 16-26102 Doc 5 Filed 08/15/16 Entered 08/15/16 12:41:00 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-26102 Doc 5 Filed 08/15/16 Entered 08/15/16 12:41:00 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5060

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 27 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Received

AN ACT

To provide for the continuation of certain fee collections

for the expenses of Securities and Exchange Commission

for fiscal year 1995.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONTINUED COLLECTION OF REVENUES AU4 THORIZED.

5 During fiscal year 1995, the rate of fees under sec6 tion 6(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77f(b))

shall remain at 1 7 ⁄29 of 1 percent.

8 SEC. 2. DEPOSIT OF COLLECTIONS.

9 The fees collected under section 6(b) of the Securities

10 Act of 1933 (to the extent attributable to a rate in excess

of 1 11 ⁄50 of 1 percent by reason of section 1 of this Act)

12 shall be deposited as an offsetting collection to the
2

HR 5060 RDS

1 amounts appropriated to the Securities and Exchange

2 Commission for fiscal year 1995, to remain available until

3 expended.

Passed the House of Representatives September 27,

1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
§ 80.167 Limitations on operators. The operator of maritime radio equipment other than T-1, T-2, T, or G licensees must not: ( a ) Make equipment adjustments which may affect transmitter operation;
( b ) Operate any transmitter which requires more than the use of simple external switches or manual frequency selection or transmitters whose frequency stability is not maintained by the transmitter itself.
[51 FR 31213, Sept. 2, 1986, as amended at 78 FR 23155, Apr. 18, 2013
§ 90.683 EA-based SMR system operations. ( a ) EA-based licensees authorized in the 809-824/854-869 MHz band pursuant to § 90.681 of this part may construct and operate base stations using any of the base station frequencies identified in their spectrum block anywhere within their authorized EA, provided that: ( 1 ) The EA licensee affords protection, in accordance with § 90.621(b), to all previously authorized co-channel stations that are not associated with another EA license;
( 2 ) The EA licensee complies with any rules and international agreements that restrict use of frequencies identified in their spectrum block, including the provisions of § 90.619 relating to U.S./Canadian and U.S./Mexican border areas;
( 3 ) The EA licensee limits the field strength of its base stations at any location on the border of the EA service area in accordance with § 90.689;
( 4 ) Upon request by an incumbent licensee or the Commission, the EA licensees shall furnish the technical parameters, location and coordinates of the completion of the addition, removal, relocation or modification of any of its facilities within the EA. The EA licensee must provide such information within ten (10) days of receiving a written request.
( 5 ) For any construction or alteration that would exceed the requirements of § 17.7 of this chapter, licensees must notify the appropriate Regional Office of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA Form 7460-1) and file a request for antenna height clearance and obstruction marking and lighting specifications (FCC Forn 854) with the FCC, WTB, Support Services Branch, Gettysburg, PA 17325.
( 6 ) Any additional transmitters placed in operation must not have a significant environmental effect as defined by §§ 1.1301 through 1.1319 of this chapter.
( b ) In the event that the authorization for a previously authorized co-channel station within the EA licensee's spectrum block is terminated or revoked, the EA licensee's co-channel obligations to such station will cease upon deletion of the facility from the Commission's official licensing records, and the EA licensee then will be able to construct and operate without regard to that previous authorization.
[61 FR 6158, 6159, Feb. 16, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 41216, July 31, 1997; 63 FR 68970, Dec. 14, 1998; 69 FR 67852, Nov. 22, 2004]
- Transmittal Letter from Judiciary
- Page 2
- Page 3
- Page 4
United States Bankruptcy Court

Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division

Chapter 13

Case No. 16 B 26951

Judge Deborah L. Thorne

Gail A Strope Nava

Debtor(s)

IN RE: )

)

)

Notice of Motion/Certificate of Service

Gail A Strope Nava

2315 N Keeler Ave

Chicago, IL 60639

Debtor Attorney: Cutler & Associates Ltd

via Clerk's ECF noticing procedures

On October 17, 2016 at 9:00 am, I will appear at the location 

listed to the right, and present this motion, a copy which is hereby 

served upon you.

I certify under penalty of perjury that this office caused a copy of 

this notice to be delivered to the persons named above by U.S. 

mail or by the methods indicated on or before Tuesday, September 

27, 2016.

> Dirksen Federal Building

> 219 South Dearborn

> Courtroom 613

> Chicago, IL 60604

/s/ MARILYN O. MARSHALL

MARILYN O. MARSHALL, TRUSTEE

Objection to Discharge

Comes now Marilyn O. Marshall, Standing Trustee, and requests that the Court enter an Order denying the 

debtor's discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §1328(f) and Rule 4004, and in support thereof respectfully states the 

following:

1. Debtor filed for Chapter 13 relief on August 22, 2016.

2. Previous to the case at bar the following case was filed:

Case Number Debtor Name Filed Date Discharged Date

1:14-bk-19314 Strope, Gail Ann (db) 05/22/2014 09/03/2014

1:03-bk-21262 Strope, Gail Ann (db) 05/13/2003 02/10/2004

3. Debtor received a discharge in the Chapter 7 case that was filed within 4 years of the filing of the present 

case.

4. Because the debtor received a discharge in a case filed within the preceding time frame, the debtor is not 

entitled to a discharge in this case.

WHEREFORE, the Trustee prays that this Court enter an Order denying the debtor's discharge, and for any and 

all other relief this Court deems just and proper.

Case 16-26951 Doc 14 Filed 09/26/16 Entered 09/26/16 17:30:17 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
MARILYN O. MARSHALL, TRUSTEE

Office of the Chapter 13 Trustee /s/ MARILYN O. MARSHALL

224 S Michigan Ave

Ste 800

Chicago, IL 60604

(312) 431-1300

Case 16-26951 Doc 14 Filed 09/26/16 Entered 09/26/16 17:30:17 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Jones Soda Co. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jennifer L. Cue, Chief Financial
Officer and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                    |  |                   
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------
|/s/ Jennifer L. Cue                                 |  | November 15 , 2004
|Jennifer L. Cue                                     |  |                   
|Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer |  |
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1216/2005

of 28 July 2005         

amending Regulation (EC) No 1227/2000 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine, as regards production potential

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine (1), and in particular Article 80(b) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Article 2(1a) of Regulation (EC) No 1227/2000 is hereby replaced by the following:

‘1a.   The deadline laid down in Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 shall be postponed to 31 December 2007.’

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from 1 August 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 July 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 179, 14.7.1999, p. 1. Regulation last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1795/2003 (OJ L 262, 14.10.2003, p. 13).

(2)OJ L 143, 16.6.2000, p. 1. Regulation last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1074/2005 (OJ L 175, 8.7.2005, p. 12).

----
No. 11-5835.

#### McKinney *v.*Jarriel, Warden.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
(see attached scope of accreditation for fields of testing and accredited test methods)

Print Date: 09/29/2010 

This is to signify that

BERKELEY ANALYTICAL ASSOCIATES, LLC 

815 HARBOUR WAY SOUTH, UNIT 6 

RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA 94804 

Testing Laboratory TL-383 

(Revised August 6, 2010) 

has met the requirements of the IAS Accreditation Criteria for Testing Laboratories (AC89), has demonstratewith ANS/ISO/IEC Standard 17025:2005, General criteria for the competence of testing and calibration labo

been accredited, commencing April 22, 2010, for the test methods listed in the approved scope of accreditatio

 Patrick V. McCullen C. P. Ramani, P.E.  Vice President President 
Berkeley Analytical Associates, LLC TL-383 

(Revised August 6, 2010) 

 April 22, 2010  Commencement Date C. P. Ramani

Presiden

Print Date: 09/29/2010 Berkeley Analytical Associates, LLC A815 Harbour Way South, Unit 6 Richmond, CA 94804 

FIELDS OF TESTING ACCREDITED TEST METHODS 

Formaldehyde and chemical testing ASTM Standards D 5116, D 5197, D 6007, D 6670, D 6803 and D 

GGTM.P066.R8, ANSI/BIFMA M7.1-2007, U.S. EPA 1999 CompenTO-1, U.S. EPA, 1999, Compendium Method TO-17, CA/DHS/EHL2004, CPSC-CH-C1001-09.2, U.S. EPA Method 8270D and U.S. E3545A, ISO 16000-3, ISO 16000-6, ISO 16000-9 & ISO 16000-11; CDPH/EHLB/Standard Method V1.1
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders 

DelMonte Foods Company: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-108625) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-40867, 333-52226, 333-38394, 333-34280, 333-79315, 333-102702, 333-102700, 333-102006) of Del Monte Foods Company (the Company) of our report dated June 11, 2004, except asto the 3rd paragraph under “Legal Proceedings” of Note 15 which is as of June 30, 2004, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Del Monte Foods Company and subsidiaries as of May 2, 2004 and April 27, 2003 and the relatedconsolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income and cash flows for the years then ended, which report appears in the annual report on Form 10-K of Del Monte Foods Company for the year ended May 2, 2004, and tothe reference to our firm under the heading “Selected Financial Data” included therein. Our report refers to a change in the Company’s method for accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets. 

 

/s/    KPMG LLP 

 

San Francisco, California 

July 8, 2004
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

OFFICE OF PREV ENTION, PESTICIDES
AND TOXIC SUBS TANCES

PC Code: 046679

DP Barcode: 386362

MEMORANDUM

DATE: February 22, 2011

SUBJECT: Review of Tolerance Petition for Fenamidone Rotational Resi dues in Crop Group 15 and 16 except Rice

FROM: James Hetrick, Ph.D., Senior Science Advisor

Environmental Risk Branch 3

Environmental Fate and Effect Division Office of Pesticide Programs

TO: Rosemary Kearns, Risk Manager Reviewer Tony Kish, Project Manager Fungicide Branch Registration Division (7505P)

Thru: Katrina White, Ph.D., Acting Risk Assessment Process Leader Dana Spatz, Branch Chief

Environmental Risk Branch 3

Environmental Fate and Effect Division Office of Pesticide Programs

This memorandum provides EFED review comments on tolerance petitions for fenamidone rotational residues. The registrant (Bayer Crop Science) is petitioning for a toleran ce for fenamidone rotation residues at a plant back interval of 30 days for crop groups 15 and 16 (except rice), dried shell peas (except soybeans), foliage legume, a nd alfalfa for forage and hay. This tolerance petition is proposed for a seasonal maximum fenamidone applica tion rate of 900 g/ha (0.8 lbs ai/A).

Because a drinking water exposure assessment has been conducted for fenamidone use on corn, wheat, and soybeans at a seasonal maximum application rate of 0.8 lbs ai/A and no new environmental fate data have been submitted, EFED does not believe additio nal water modeling is needed to support this tolerance petition.
Case 16-27747 Doc 5 Filed 08/30/16 Entered 08/30/16 11:13:17 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-27747 Doc 5 Filed 08/30/16 Entered 08/30/16 11:13:17 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4761 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4761

    To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize educational 
  assistance for alternative teacher certification programs, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 14, 1994

  Mr. Tejeda introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize educational 
  assistance for alternative teacher certification programs, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ALTERNATIVE TEACHER CERTIFICATION PROGRAMS.

    (a) In General.--Section 3452(c) of title 38, United States Code, 
is amended by adding at the end the following: ``For the period ending 
on September 30, 1996, such term includes entities that provide 
training required for completion of any State-approved alternative 
teacher certification program (as determined by the Secretary).''.
    (b) Clarifying Amendment.--Section 3002 of title 38, United States 
Code, is amended by adding at the end thereof the following:
            ``(8) The term `educational institution' has the meaning 
        given such term in section 3452(c) of this title.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall be 
effective on the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 96.43 Additional requirements for category A CBSDs. ( a ) Category A CBSDs shall not be deployed or operated outdoors with antennas exceeding 6 meters height above average terrain. CBSDs deployed or operated outdoors with antennas exceeding 6 meters height above average terrain will be classified as, and subject to, the operational requirements of Category B CBSDs.
( b ) When registering with an SAS, Category A CBSDs must transmit all information required under § 96.39. This transmission shall also indicate whether the device will be operated indoors or outdoors.
( c ) Any CBSD operated at higher power than specified for Category A CBSDs in § 96.41 will be classified as, and subject to, the operational requirements of a Category B CBSD.
No. 11-254.

#### Wei *v.*Missouri Director of Revenue.

Ct. App. Mo., Southern Dist. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-6099.

#### Asante *v.*United States.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
#### §§ 95.2175-95.2177 [Reserved]
§ 76.913 Assumption of jurisdiction by the Commission. ( a ) Upon denial or revocation of the franchising authority's certification, the Commission will regulate rates for cable services and associated equipment of a cable system not subject to effective competition, as defined in § 76.905, in a franchise area. Such regulation by the Commission will continue until the franchising authority has obtained certification or recertification.
( b ) A franchising authority unable to meet certification standards may petition the Commission to regulate the rates for basic cable service and associated equipment of its franchisee when: ( 1 ) The franchising authority lacks the resources to administer rate regulation.
( 2 ) The franchising authority lacks the legal authority to regulate basic service rates; *Provided, however,* That the authority must submit with its request a statement detailing the nature of the legal infirmity.
( c ) The Commission will regulate basic service rates pursuant to this Section until the franchising authority qualifies to exercise jurisdiction pursuant to § 76.916.
[58 FR 29753, May 21, 1993, as amended at 62 FR 6495, Feb. 12, 1997]