alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 76.1714 Familiarity with FCC rules. ( a ) The operator of a cable television system is expected to be familiar with the rules governing cable television systems and, if subject to the Emergency Alert System (EAS) rules contained in part 11 of this chapter, the EAS rules. Copies of the Commission's rules may be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents, Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401, at nominal cost, or accessed online at *https://www.ecfr.gov* or *https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/collectionCfr.action?collectionCode=CFR .* Copies of the EAS Operating Handbook may be accessed online at *https://www.fcc.gov/general/eas-test-reporting-system .*
( b ) The provisions of paragraph (a) of this section are not applicable to any cable television system serving fewer than 1000 subscribers.
( c ) Both the licensee of a cable television relay station (CARS) and the operator or operators responsible for the proper operation of the station are expected to be familiar with the rules governing cable television relay stations. Copies of the Commission's rules may be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents, Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401, at nominal cost, or accessed online at *https://www.ecfr.gov* or *https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/collectionCfr.action?collectionCode=CFR .*
[65 FR 53621, Sept. 5, 2000, as amended at 83 FR 13683, Mar. 30, 2018]
§ 95.979 CBRS unwanted emissions limits. Each CBRS transmitter type must be designed to comply with the applicable unwanted emissions limits in this section. ( a ) *Attenuation requirements.* The power of unwanted emissions must be attenuated below the transmitter output power in Watts (P) as specified in the applicable paragraphs listed in the following table: Emission type
Paragraph A3E, F3E
(1), (3), (5), (6) H3E, J3E, R3E
(2), (4), (5), (6)
( 1 ) 25 dB (decibels) in the frequency band 4 kHz to 8 kHz removed from the channel center frequency;
( 2 ) 25 dB in the frequency band 2 kHz to 6 kHz removed from the channel center frequency;
( 3 ) 35 dB in the frequency band 8 kHz to 20 kHz removed from the channel center frequency;
( 4 ) 35 dB in the frequency band 6 kHz to 10 kHz removed from the channel center frequency;
( 5 ) 53 + 10 log (P) dB in any frequency band removed from the channel center frequency by more than 250% of the authorized bandwidth.
( 6 ) 60 dB in any frequency band centered on a harmonic (*i.e.,* an integer multiple of two or more times) of the carrier frequency.
( b ) *Measurement bandwidths.* The power of unwanted emissions in the frequency bands specified in paragraphs (a)(1) through (4) of this section is measured with a reference bandwidth of 300 Hz. The power of unwanted emissions in the frequency ranges specified in paragraphs (a)(5) and (6) of this section is measured with a reference bandwidth of at least 30 kHz.
( c ) *Measurement conditions and procedures.* Subject to additional measurement standards and procedures established pursuant to part 2, subpart J, the following conditions and procedures must be used. ( 1 ) The unwanted emissions limits requirements in this section must be met both with and without the connection of permitted attachments, such as external speakers, microphones, power cords and/or antennas.
( 2 ) Either mean power output or peak envelope power output may be used for measurements, as appropriate for the emission type under test, provided that the same type of power measurement is used for both the transmitter output power and the power of the unwanted emissions.
[82 FR 41104, Aug. 29, 2017, as amended at 86 FR 53565, Sept. 28, 2021]
**Exhibit
      32.2**








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Genesis Capital
      Corporation of Nevada (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2007
      as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), the undersigned Christopher Astrom, Chief Financial Officer of
      Genesis Capital Corporation of Nevada, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002,


that:





(1) the
      Report
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      May 15, 2007





/s/
      CHRISTOPHER ASTROM


Christopher
      Astrom


Chief
      Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


     Each person whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints
John Hetterick and Volker Oakey and each of them, his true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and
re-substitution for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign the Verdant Brands, Inc. (the "Company") Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1999 (the "1999 Form 10-KSB") under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any and all amendments
thereto, and to file such 1999 Form 10-KSB and any and all such amendments, with
all exhibits thereto, and all other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, state securities administrations and any and
all other agencies or administrations as may be deemed necessary or advisable by
said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, granting unto said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do
and perform each and every act and thing requisite or necessary to be done in
and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or
could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, or either of them, or their or his substitutes,
may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Power of Attorney has been signed on the 27th day
of March 2000, by the following persons:


 /s/ Gordon F. Stofer                                     /s/ Robert W. Fischer
-------------------------------                           ---------------------
Gordon F. Stofer                                          Robert W. Fischer

/s/ Stanley Goldberg                                      /s/ Donald E. Lovness
-------------------------------                           ---------------------
Stanley Goldberg                                          Donald E. Lovness

/s/ John R. Hetterick                                     /s/ Franklin Pass
-------------------------------                           ---------------------
John R. Hetterick                                         Franklin Pass

/s/ Frederick F. Yanni, Jr.                               /s/ Richard Mayo
-------------------------------                           ---------------------
Frederick F. Yanni, Jr.                                   Richard Mayo

/s/ Volker Oakey                                          /s/ John A. Hinds
-------------------------------                           ---------------------
Volker Oakey                                              John A. Hinds
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 5, 2018

s1128

Order 

Clerk

December 5, 2018

156980

COUNTY OF INGHAM, COUNTY OF

JACKSON, and COUNTY OF CALHOUN,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 156980

COA: 334077

Ingham CC: 15-000432-NZ

MICHIGAN COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION

SELF-INSURANCE POOL,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 10, 2017 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for 

consideration of the issue raised by the defendant but not addressed by that court during 

its initial review of this case: Whether, even if the plaintiff counties are successors in 

interest to their road commissions, the defendant Michigan County Road Commission 

Self-Insurance Pool nevertheless may, in accordance with its governing documents, 

decline to issue to the counties refunds of surplus premiums from prior-year 

contributions. In addressing this question, the Court of Appeals shall consider, among 

other things, the following documents: the Declaration of Trust, By-Laws, Inter-Local 

Agreements, MCRCSIP Refund Overview, and the July 19, 1990 memorandum to the 

Pool members. The court shall address whether these documents are binding on the 

parties, and, if so, what effect they have on the plaintiffs’ entitlement to refunds. 

We do not retain jurisdiction.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5045 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5045

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
                coastwise trade for the vessel ANDREW J.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 13, 1994

 Mr. Hoekstra introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
                coastwise trade for the vessel ANDREW J.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the 
Act of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106 of title 
46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue a 
certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for 
employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel ANDREW J. (United 
States official number 322524).
                                 <all>
```
#### § 95.943 [Reserved]
Exhibit 15.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement (Form F-3 No. 333-111040) of Teléfonos de México, S.A.B. de C.V. and in the related prospectus of our reports dated June 23, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Teléfonos de México, S.A.B. de C.V., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Teléfonos de México, S.A.B. de C.V., included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended
December 31, 2007.



Mancera, S.C.A member firm of Ernst & Young Global/s/ CPC Fernando Espinosa LópezC.P.C. Fernando Espinosa López




|                   
|-------------------
|Mexico City, Mexico
|June 27, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Mar-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  Mar-31-1998
<CASH>                             14,469
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                       3,557
<ALLOWANCES>                          345
<INVENTORY>                           327
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   18,398
<PP&E>                              1,372
<DEPRECIATION>                        487
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     46,481
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               8,635
<BONDS>                                 0
<COMMON>                                3
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<OTHER-SE>                         37,072
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       46,481
<SALES>                            16,354
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   21,151
<CGS>                               6,489
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       6,489
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    6,514
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     17
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     8,131
<INCOME-TAX>                        2,312
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 5,819
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                        5,819
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                         .19
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Dean
Witter Portfolio Strategy Fund L.P. and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                      79,569,551
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  416,731<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              97,229,865<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                97,229,865<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,787,350<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,029,613
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,757,737
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,757,737
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,757,737
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include interest receivable of $370,732 and due from DWR
of $45,999.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net
unrealized gain on open contracts of $17,243,583.
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $1,683,288, management
fees payable of $161,622, and accrued administrative expenses of $95,064.
<F4>Total revenues includes realized trading revenue of $(586,022),
net change in unrealized of $12,129,234 and interest income
of $4,244,138.
</FN>



</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 8, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-41565

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

ROBERT H CLARK, JR

Defendant - Appellant

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:03-CR-232-1

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and SMITH and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Robert H. Clark, Jr., appeals his sentence following his

guilty plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to

distribute 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing

methamphetamine, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846. 

Clark argues that his sentence must be vacated in light of United

States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005).

In Booker, 125 S. Ct. at 756, the Supreme Court held that

"[a]ny fact (other than a prior conviction) which is necessary to
No. 04-41565

-2-

support a sentence exceeding the maximum authorized by the facts

established by a plea of guilty or a jury verdict must be

admitted by the defendant or proved to a jury beyond a reasonable

doubt." Booker also struck down 18 U.S.C. § 3553(b)(1) and thus

rendered the Guidelines advisory only. Id. at 764-65.

The district court based Clark’s sentence on its finding

that Clark was responsible for more than 1.5 kilograms of “ice,”

which is a mixture or substance containing d-methamphetamine

hydrochloride of at least 80 percent purity, and it calculated

his offense level accordingly. The district court also applied a

sentencing enhancement because a firearm was possessed in

relation to this offense and for Clark’s role as a leader or

organizer. Clark did not admit these facts in the district court

and objected to the enhancements on Sixth Amendment grounds. 

Clark’s 360-month sentence exceeded the maximum sentence that

could have been imposed based solely on his plea and constituted

a Sixth Amendment violation under Booker. See Booker, 125 S. Ct.

at 769.

When, as here, the defendant has preserved this error, we

will ordinarily vacate the sentence and remand, unless we can say

that the error is harmless. United States v. Pineiro, 410 F.3d.

282, 284 (5th Cir. 2005). In order to carry this burden, the

Government must show that the Booker error did not affect the

sentence that the defendant received; it must show “that the
No. 04-41565

-3-

district court would have imposed the same sentence absent the

error.” Id. at 286.

Although the Government asserts that the sentence was

reasonable, it concedes that it cannot establish beyond a

reasonable doubt that the mandatory nature of the Sentencing

Guidelines at the time of Clark’s sentence did not contribute to

the sentence that he received. See id. Accordingly, Clark’s

sentence must be vacated and remanded for resentencing.

VACATED AND REMANDED.
September 21, 2011 

MEMORANDUM 

From: William H. Maxwell 

EPA/SPPD/ESG (D243-01) 

To: Docket Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234 

Subject: Meeting with PJM 

Attendees: 

See attached. 

Discussion: 

A general discussion was held of the attached materials.
32.1
            Certification
      of the Chief Executive Officer of Genesis Capital Corporation of Nevada
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of
  2002








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Genesis Capital Corporation
of Nevada (the "Company") for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Richard Astrom, Chief Executive Officer of Genesis Capital
Corporation of Nevada, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Dated:
February 17, 2009




/s/
RICHARD ASTROM





Richard
Astrom


Chief
Executive Officer
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

BARBARO HERIBERTO MESA )

RODRIGUEZ, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-2433

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed December 19, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee

County; Joseph C. Fuller, Jr., Judge.

Andrew F. Rier and Jonathan E. Jordan of 

Rier Jordan, P.A., Miami, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Johnny T. Salgado, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, 

for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, SILBERMAN, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Filter ResultsTitlecloseAuthorAuthorOrganizationOrganizationPublication DateremoveDate AcquiredremoveTypeTypeCenterSubject CategorySubject CategoryReport NumbersReport NumbersFunding NumbersFunding NumbersKeywordsKeywordsClearApplymenuClear FilterExportBest MatchBest MatchItems per page:251 – 25 of 17772Collections**PubSpace**Top ResultsSource**16790**STI Collection**842**JPL**140**CHORUSpublished**556**2017**545**2016**544**2018**542**2019**405**2012author**132**Pinelli, Thomas E.**87**Kennedy, John M.**83**Barclay, Rebecca O.**71**LaBel, Kenneth A.**56**Steven PawsonType**4282**Conference Paper**3870**Presentation**1440**Technical Memorandum (TM)**1398**Contractor Report (CR)**1135**Othercenter**6109**CDMS**1656**LaRC**1637**GSFC**1302**GRC**1273**MSFCsubject Category**994**Earth Resources And Remote Sensing**686**Documentation And Information Science**671**Man/System Technology And Life Support**571**Meteorology And Climatology**486**Spacecraft Design, Testing And Performancekeyword**122**NASA PROGRAM**95**NASA**43**remote sensing**27**Mars**25**Icingdistribution**17772**Public
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024