alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT SHADR AC K S. GOAD, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. M C T GR OUP; e t

a l ., De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 10-55615 D.C . No. 3:09-c v-01321-B TM POR M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Southe rn Distric t of C a lifornia B arry T. M oskowitz , C hie f Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

M ay 13, 2014 ** B e fore : C LIFTON, B EA, a nd WATFORD, C irc uit Judge s. Sha dra c k S. Goa d a

ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt on the ple a dings in his ac tion a lle ging viola tions of theFa i r De bt C olle c tion Pra c tic e s Ac t (“ FDC PA” ) and the C a lifornia R ose ntha l Fa i r De b t C olle c tion Pra c tic e s Ac t (“ RFDC PA” ). W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie wde novo. 

# FIL ED MAY29 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).Mac

Donald v . Grac eC

hurc h Se attle , 457 F.3d 1079, 1081 (9th C ir. 2006). W e a ffirm . The distric t c ourt prope rly grante d judgm e nt on theple a dings be c a use the B ankruptc y

C ode pre c lude s Goa d’ s c la im s. Se eW alls v . W e lls Fargo Bank

, N .A. , 276 F.3d 502, 504, 510-11 (9th C ir. 2002) (holding tha t a disc ha rge d de b tor m ay not bring a c la im

unde r the FDC PA re ga

rding viola

tion of a ba nkruptc y disc ha rge injunc tion be c a

use it would “ c irc um

ve nt the B ankruptc y

C ode ’ s re m e dia l sc he m e ” ); s e ealso C a l. C i v. C o de § 1788.17 (the R FDC PA’ s inc orporation by re fe re n c e of the FDC PA). W e do not c onside r argum e nts ra ise d for the first tim e on a ppe a l. Se e Padge tt v . W

right , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th C ir. 2009) (pe r c uriam ). AFFIRM E D.

1 0 - 5 5 6 1 5 2
V

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4844

For the relief of Gulnur Akbal Walmsley.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 27, 1994

Mr. SLATTERY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Gulnur Akbal Walmsley.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. IMMEDIATE RELATIVE STATUS FOR GULNUR

4 AKBAL WALMSLEY.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Gulnur Akbal Walmsley shall be

6 classified as an immediate relative within the meaning of

7 section 201(b)(2)(A)(i) of the Immigration and National8 ity Act for purposes of approval of a relative visa petition

9 filed under section 204 of such Act by Gulnur Akbal

10 Walmsley and the filing of an application for an immi11 grant visa or for adjustment of status.
2

•HR 4844 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Gulnur Akbal

2 Walmsley enters the United States before the filing dead3 line specified in subsection (c), she shall be considered to

4 have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise

5 eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section

6 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date

7 of the enactment of this Act.

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the pe10 tition and the application for issuance of an immigrant

11 visa or the application for adjustment of status are filed

12 by Gulnur Akbal Walmsley with appropriate fees within

13 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.

14 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

15 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res16 idence to Gulnur Akbal Walmsley, the Secretary of State

17 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, for the

18 following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas

19 available under section 201(c)(1)(A) of the Immigration

20 and Nationality Act.

Æ
No. 11-9677.

#### Jennings *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

March 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 132723 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 132723 COA: 273622 Allegan CC: 02-012380-FC CHRISTOPHER HENRY FLOURNOY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 6, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d0319 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 26, 2007

Clerk
Amendment
      No. 1 dated as of July 10, 2006 to Asset Purchase Agreement dated May 25, 2005
      (the “Purchase Agreement”) between Sea Change Group, LLC, a New York limited
      liability company (“Seller”), and Innopump, Inc., a Nevada corporation
      (“Buyer”). 

    


    RECITALS

     

    Buyer
      and
      Seller, having entered into the Purchase Agreement, now wish to amend the
      Purchase Agreement by deleting therefrom one of its provisions.

    


    NOW
      THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the parties hereto agree as
      follows:

    


    
      	
              1.

            	
              Amendment.
                Section 3.1.2 is hereby deleted from the Purchase Agreement.
                

            


    

    


    
      	
              2.

            	
              Effect
                of Amendment. Except as amended hereby, the Purchase Agreement shall
                remain unmodified and in full force and effect, and is ratified and
                confirmed in all respects. 

            


    

    


    
      	
              3.

            	
              Entire
                Agreement. This Amendment together with the Purchase Agreement
                constitute the full and entire understanding and agreement between
                Seller
                and Buyer with regard to the subjects set forth in the Purchase Agreement.
                

            


    

    


    
      	
              4.

            	
              Headings.
                The headings contained in this Amendment are for convenience of reference
                only and are not to be given any legal effect and shall not affect
                the
                meaning or interpretation of this Amendment.


            


    

    


    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first
      written above.

     

    
      
        	
                SEA
                  CHANGE GROUP, LLC

              	 	
                INNOPUMP,
                  INC.

              
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
                By:

              	 	 	
                By:

              	 
	
                
Name: 

              	
                
 	 	 

                Name:

              	
                
  
	
                
                  Title:

                

              	 	 	
                Title:
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P372The Arlington Restaurant Initiative: A Nightlife Policing Strategy to Improve Safety and Economic ViabilityThe Arlington County (Virginia) Police Department (ACPD) has instituted the Arlington Restaurant Initiative, a voluntary accreditation system based on Best Bar None - a program designed to establish and promote relationships between restaurants and bars, local authorities, and the community by promoting responsible alcohol management - that originated in Manchester, UK, in 2003. This publication describes the ACPD's work to change its policing approach in the popular Clarendon nightlife area from a focus on enforcement to a focus on prevention. It also discusses a research analysis of the program conducted by the Center for Evidence-Based Crime Policy at George Mason University.By Dimitrios MastorasCategories: Community Partnerships • Data and Analysis • Police OperationsLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p372Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFBook • Oct 2019Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 05:33 (UTC-5) in 0.19 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 174 (Friday, September 8, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 53079]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7494]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Glenn/Colusa County Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Glenn/Colusa County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will 
meet in Willows, California. Agenda items to be covered include: (1) 
Introductions, (2) Approval of Minutes, (3) Public Comments, (4) 
Project Proposal/Possible Action, (5) General Discussion (6) Plan 
Schedule for the Next Year, (7) Next agenda.

DATES: The meeting will be held on September 18, 2006, from 1:30 p.m. 
and end at approximately 4:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Mendocino National Forest 
Supervisor's Office, 825 N. Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 95988. 
Individuals wishing to speak or purpose agenda items must send their 
names and proposals to Tricia Christofferson, Acting DFO, 825 N. 
Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 95988.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bobbin Gaddini, Committee Coordinator, 
USDA, Mendocino National Forest, Grindstone Ranger District, 825 N. 
Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 95988. (530) 934-1268; e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3552525451515c5b7553461b5350511b4046"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7611111712121f1836100558101312580305">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Committee 
discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee members. 
However, persons who wish to bring matters to the attention of the 
Committee may file written statements with the Committee staff before 
or after the meeting. Public input sessions will be provided and 
individuals who made written requests by September 15, 2006 will have 
the opportunity to address the committee at those sessions.

    Dated: August 31, 2006.
Paul Montgomery,
Acting Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 06-7494 Filed 9-7-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 90.476 Interconnection of fixed stations and certain mobile stations. ( a ) Fixed stations and mobile stations used to provide the functions of fixed stations pursuant to the provisions of §§ 90.35(c)(11), 90.35(c)(42), and 90.267 are not subject to the interconnection provisions of §§ 90.477 and 90.483 and may be interconnected with the facilities of common carriers.
( b ) Mobile stations used to provide the functions of base and mobile relay stations pursuant to the provisions of §§ 90.35(c)(11), 90.35(c)(42), and 90.267 are not subject to the provisions of § 90.477(d)(3) and may be interconnected with the facilities of common carriers subject to the provisions of §§ 90.477(d)(1), 90.477(d)(2), 90.477(e), and 90.483.
( c ) The provisions of this section do not apply to commercial mobile radio service providers, as defined in part 20 of this chapter.
[50 FR 15152, Apr. 17, 1985, as amended at 59 FR 59965, Nov. 21, 1994; 62 FR 18934, Apr. 17, 1997]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                            970
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               10,270
<PP&E>                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 10,270
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             513
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        2,650
<OTHER-SE>                                      9,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   10,270
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  318
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     0
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (318)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (318)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .001
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .00



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5018 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5018

    To limit the authority of the Interstate Commerce Commission to 
            overturn certain employee protection agreements.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 21, 1994

 Mr. Williams introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To limit the authority of the Interstate Commerce Commission to 
            overturn certain employee protection agreements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION OF AUTHORITY.

    (a) Amendments.--(1) Section 10327(g)(1) of title 49, United States 
Code, is amended by inserting ``The Commission may not use the 
authority granted under this paragraph to overturn an employee 
protection arrangement agreed to by all parties to the arrangement.'' 
after ``regulations of the Commission.''.
    (2) Section 11351 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``The Commission may not use the authority granted under this 
section to overturn an employee protection arrangement agreed to by all 
parties to the arrangement.'' after ``11347 of this title.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall be 
effective as of January 1, 1984.
                                 <all>
```
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 166 / Monday, August 28, 2006 / Presidential Documents 51093 

Notice of August 24, 2006 

Intention To Enter Into a Free Trade Agreement With Colombia 

Consistent with section 2105(a)(1)(A) of the Trade Act of 2002, I have 

notified the Congress of my intention to enter into a free trade agreement 

with the Republic of Colombia. 

Consistent with section 2105(a)(1)(A) of that Act, this notice shall be published in the Federal Register. 

W 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

August 24, 2006. [FR Doc. 06–7221 

Filed 8–25–06; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3190–01–M 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
EXHIBIT
31.2







CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







I, Brent
Fouch, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Angel Acquisition Corp.
;





2. Based on
my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;




3. Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:





(a) designed such
disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





(b) evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a
date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and





(c) presented in this
quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;





5. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





(a) all significant
deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize, and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls;
and





(b) any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
and





6. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.







Dated:
      May 19, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Brent
      FouchBrent
      FouchTreasurer,
      Principal Accounting  Officer and Director
#### § 95.575 FRS modulation limits.

Each FRS transmitter type must be designed such that the peak frequency deviation does not exceed 2.5 kHz, and the highest audio frequency contributing substantially to modulation must not exceed 3.125 kHz.
No. 11-6148.

#### Burke *v.*United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
United States Sentencing Commission
§ 12.69 When may the Service sell forfeited or abandoned property? ( a ) The Service may sell, or offer for sale, forfeited or abandoned fish, wildlife, or plants, except any species, which at the time of sale or offer for sale, is: ( 1 ) Listed in part 10 of this subchapter as a migratory bird protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 703 *et seq.*);
( 2 ) Protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 *et seq.*);
( 3 ) Listed in Appendix I, or in Appendix II with an annotation (limiting commercial use of specimens of the species or where specimens of the species are treated as if listed in Appendix I), under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) (See § 23.91 of this chapter);
( 4 ) Listed in part 17 of this chapter as “endangered” or “threatened” under the Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 *et seq.*);
( 5 ) Protected under the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1361 *et seq.*);
( 6 ) Regulated as an injurious species under our injurious species regulations in part 16 of this chapter;
( 7 ) The African elephant (*Loxodonta* species);
( 8 ) Protected under the Wild Bird Conservation Act, (16 U.S.C. 4901 *et seq.*); or
( 9 ) Protected under the Rhinoceros and Tiger Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 5301 *et seq.*);
( 10 ) Protected under the Big Cat Public Safety Act (16 U.S.C. 3371(h), 3372(e), 117 Public Law 243, 136 Stat. 2336); or
( 11 ) Any fish, wildlife, or plant that is prohibited for export by the country of origin of the species.
( b ) If the Service chooses to dispose of fish, wildlife, or plants by sale, we must do so under current Federal property management regulations or Customs laws and regulations, except that the Service may sell any fish, wildlife, or plants immediately to the highest bidder above the set minimum bid, if the Service determines that the fish, wildlife, or plants are likely to perish, deteriorate, decay, waste, or greatly decrease in value by keeping, or that the expense of keeping the fish, wildlife, or plants is disproportionate to their value.
( c ) The Service may transport fish, wildlife, or plants that may not be possessed lawfully by purchasers under the laws of the State where the fish, wildlife, or plants are held to a State where possession of the fish, wildlife, or plants is lawful and the fish, wildlife, or plants may be sold.
( d ) Fish, wildlife, or plants purchased at sale are subject to the prohibitions, restrictions, conditions, or requirements that apply to a particular species of fish, wildlife or plant imposed by Federal, State, or Tribal or foreign law or regulation.
No. 10-10857.

#### Ucak *v.*Georgia.

Sup. Ct. Ga. Certiorari denied.