UNITED STATES OF AMERI CA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

WASHI NGTON, DC

Regulatory

Docket No. _______________

**IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION FOR EXEMPTION OF:**

**Matthew J .**  **Hummel FOR AN EXEMPTION SEEKING RELIEF FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF** 

**TITLE 14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS SECTIONS 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1),**  **91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), AND 91.417(a) & (b) CONCERNING COMMERCIAL OPERATION**  **OF DJI PHANTOM 2 VISION UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS**  **PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF THE FAA MODERNIZATION AND REFORM ACT OF 2012** 

**(PUBLIC LAW 112 -**  **95)**

Submitted on February 10 , 201 6 Matthew J. Hummel (FAA# FA3CTCPMLT) 4 9 36 Narbeck Ave. Everett , WA Tel: ( 206 ) 992

- 04622 **TABLE OF CONTENTS** Page GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS...................................................................................3 SUMMARY.................................................................................................... .......................4 IN TRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF PETITIONER....................................................4 BACKGROUND................................................................................................................... .4 BAS IS FOR PETITION.........................................................................................................5 NAME AND ADDRESS OF PETITIONER............................................................. 8 THE SPECIFI C SECTIONS OF 14 C.F.R. FRO M WHI CH MATTHEW J
. HUMMEL SEEKS EXEMPTI ON

...... ............................................................... ....... 8 THE EXTENT OF RELIEF MATTHEW J. HUMMELAND THE REASON MATTHEW J. HUMMEL SEEKS THE RELIEF...
...... ....................................... 11 THE REASONS WHY GRANTING MATTHEW J. HUMMEL ’ S REQUEST WOULD BE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST .........................................................15 THE REASONS WHY GRANTING THE EXEMPTI ON WOULD NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT SAFETY.......................................... ................................19 SUMMARY THAT CAN BE PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGI STER......34 ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, VIEWS, OR ARGUMENTS AVAILABLE TO SUPPORT MATTHEW J. HUMMEL ’S REQUEST.........

...................................................... ................................................ 34 CONCLUSION................................................................................................................... .35 APPENDI CES........................................................................................373 **GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS** AGL Above Ground Level AOI Area of Interest ATC Air Traffic Control ATO Air Traffic Organization AV Aerial Vehicle CFR Code of Federal Regulations COA Certificate of Authorization FAA Federal Aviation Administration FAR Federal Aviation Regulation GCS Ground Control Station GPS Global Positioning System LOL Loss of Link NAS National Airspace Sy stem NOTAM Notice to Airman PI C Pilot In Command Section 333 FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) Section 333 SO Safety Observer SOP Standard Operating Procedures UA Unmanned Aircraft UAS Unmanned Aircraft Sy stem VFR Visual Flight Rules VLOS Visual L ine of Site VMC Visual Meteorological Conditions VTOL Vertical Takeoff and Landing4 **SUMMARY** Matthew J. Hummel seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), to operate an Unmanned Aircraft S ys tem pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA). This exemption will permit Matthew J. Hummel to operate an Unmanned Aircraft S ys tem (UAS) for the commercial purpose of conducting aerial video and photography of construction sites, roof inspections , real estate, and landscape over certain areas of the United States.

**INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF THE PETITIONER** Matthew J. Hummel provides clients with expertise and knowledge in property inspection condition as part of his real estate inspection servi ce. Matthew J. Hummel has
over 30 + ye ars of professional experience in property condition inspections and is recognized as an expert in the home inspection industry in Washington State. Th e objective Matthew J. Hummel ’s aerial video and photography operation s is to provide high quality imaging for a variety

of comme rcial, public, and residential uses, specificall y targeting:

 Real estate and private property aerial photography especiall y roof inspections.

 Aerial acquisiti ons used for inspections of public and private structures.

 In crease public knowledge of UAS and promote safe UAS operations.5 **BACKGROUND** Unmanned Aircraft Sy stems: DJIPhantom 2 Vision Matthew J

. Hummel seeks an exemption to operate DJ I sy stems for compensation or hire within the NAS. The DJ I Phantom 2 Vision is a vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) Unmanned Aircraft (UA) with a Ground Control Station (GCS) utilizing electronic tablet or smart phone sy stems. The DJ I Phantom 2 Vision has a maximum gro ss weight of approximately

2 pounds 11 ounces, while having a length of 16 inches width of 16 inches, height of 8 inches, and a maximum speed of approximately 29 knots. The DJ I Phantom 2 Vision is equipped with four main rotors; driven by L ithium Poly

mer b attery powered electric motors. The DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS that will be operated by Matthew J. Hummel will be registered in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 44103, Registration of Aircraft , as well as 14 C.F.R Part 47, Aircraft Registration , and marked in acco rdance with 14 C.F.R. Part 45, Identification and Registration Marking

. **BASIS FOR PETITION** Petitioner, Matthew J . Hummel , pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 C.F.R. § 11.61) and the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), Section 333, Special Rules for Certain Unmanned Aircraft Systems , hereb y petitions the Administrator to commercial ly operate the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS in the National Airspace Sy stem (NAS), and for an exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b).6 In c onsideration of the speed, weight, size, and limited operating area associated with the unmanned aircraft and its operation, Matthew J. Hummel ’s operation of DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS meets the conditions of FMRA Section 333 and therefore, will not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. Accordingl y, Matthew J. Hummel requests relief from Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), as these sections set forth requirements for maintenance that onl y appl y to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate. Matthew J. Hummel submits that the requested relief is proper since an equivalent level of safety

will be ensured. Matthew J. Hummel will use experienced personnel or technicians to perform maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UASs using the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed in the operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log , and DJ I Phantom 2 Vision Instruction Manual). Furthermore, Matthew J. Hummel will document and maintain all maintenance records for the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS

. Relief from certain requirements of Section 61.113(a) and (b), entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in command, is requested by Matthew J. Hummel to the extent necessary

to allow a Pilot in Command (PIC) holding a private pilot or higher level certificate, as well as an airman medical certificate, and who has demonstrated, b y meeting minimum flight

- hour and currency requirements, that the PI C i s able to safely operate the DJIPhantom 2 Vision UAS in a manner consistent with this exemption, including evasive and emergency

maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures.7 Matthew J. Hummel seeks relief from Section 91.7(a), entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness , because the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS do es not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. As such, Matthew J. Hummel submits that he will e nsure that the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS is in an airworthy condition, prior to every

flight, by determining that the UAS is in compliance with the operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJ I Phantom 2 Vision Instruction Manual), and that th e aircraft is in a condition for safe flight. Matthew J. Hummel also seeks an exemption from the requirements of Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter Settings , as the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UA will not have a typical barometric altimeter onboard. However, alt itude information of the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UA will be provided to the PI C via Global Positioning Sy stem (GPS) equipment and radio communications telemetry data link, which downlinks from the UA to the GCS for active monitoring of the flight path. This altitude information, combined with Matthew J. Hummel ’s operation of the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS within **visual line of sight** , at or below **4 00**  feet AGL, will ensure a level of safety equivalent to Section 91.121. Additionally , Matthew J. Hummel seeks an ex emption from the requirements of Section 91.151(b), entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions

. Matthew J. Hummel submits that safety will not be affected by

operation of the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UA during daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC) under visual flight rules (VFR), with enough battery power to fly

for a total duration of approximately 13.5 minutes to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed , to fl y after that for at least 4.5 minutes.8 In accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 11.81, Matthew J. Hummel provides the following information in support of its petition for exemption: **A. Name And Address Of The Petitioner.**  The name and address of the Petition er and point of contact is: Matthew J. Hummel (FA3CTCPML T registration number with FAA) 4 9 36 Narbeck Ave. Everett , WA 98203 Tel: ( 206 ) 992

- 0462 Email: totalbldganal ys is@yahoo.com **B. The Spec ific Sections Of 14 C.F.R. From**  **Which Matthew**  **J . Hummel**  **Seeks Exemption.**  **1. Matthew J. Hummel**  **Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 61.113(a) And (b).**  Section 61.113, entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in command, subsections (a) and (b) prescribe the following, in relevant part: (a) No person who holds a private pilot certificate may act as a pilot in command (PI C) of an aircraft that is carrying passengers or property for compensation or hire; nor may

that pers on, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft. (b) A private pilot may , for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft in connection with any business or emplo ym ent if

— (1) The flight is only

incidental to that business or employ ment; and (2) The aircraft does not carry passengers or property

for compensation or hire.
**2. Matthew J. Hummel**  **Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.7(a).**  Section 91.7, entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness , subsection (a), states the following: (a) No person may

operate a civil aircraft unless it is in an airworthy condition.9 **3. Matthew J. Hummel**  **Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.121.**  Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter settings , subsection (a), states the following, in part: (a) Each person operating an aircraft shall maintain the cruising altitude or flight level of that aircraft, as the case may be, b y reference to an altimeter that is set, when operating

-- (1) Below 18,000 feet MSL , to
-- (i ) The current reported altimeter setting of a station along the route and within 100 nautical miles of the aircraft; (ii) If there is no station within the area prescribed in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section, the current reported altimeter setting of a n appropriate available station; or (iii) In the case of an aircraft not equipped with a radio, the elevation of the departure airport or an appropriate altimeter setting available before departure. **4. Matthew J. Hummel**  **Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section**  **91.151(b).** Section 91.151, entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions , subsection (b), states the following: (b ) No person may begin a flight in a rotorcraft under VFR conditions unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 20 minutes. **5. Matthew J. Hummel**  **Seeks Exemption From The Requirement Of Section 91.405(a).**  Sect ion 91.405, entitled Maintenance required, subsection (a), states the following: Each owner or operator of an aircraft

— (a) Shall have that aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections, except as provid ed in paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter[.]10 **6. Matthew J. Hummel**  **Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of**  **Section 91.407(a)(1)**  Section 91.407, entitled Operation after maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration , subsection (a)(1), states the following: (a) No person may

operate any

aircraft that has undergone maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration unless

-- (1) It has been approved for return to service b y a person authorized under § 43.7 of this chapter[.] **7. Matthew J. Hummel**  **Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections 91.409(a)(1) And 91.409(a)(2).**  Section 91.409, entitled Inspections , subsection ( a), states the following: (a) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, no person may operate an aircraft unless, within the preceding 12 calendar months, it has had

-- (1) An annual inspection in accordance with part 43 of this chapter and ha s been approved for return to service b y a person authorized by § 43.7 of this chapter; or (2) An inspection for the issuance of an airworthiness certificate in accordance with part 21 of this chapter. **8. Matthew J. Hummel**  **Seeks Exemption From The Requir ements Of Sections**  **91.417(a) And 91.417(b).** Section 91.417, entitled Maintenance records , subsections (a) and (b), state the following: (a) Except for work performed in accordance with §§ 91.411 and 91.413, each registered owner or operator shall keep the following records for the periods specified in paragraph (b) of this section: (1) Records of the maintenance, preventive maintenance, a nd alteration and records of the 100

- hour, annual, progressive, and other required or approved inspections, as appropriate, for each aircraft (including the airframe) and each engine, propeller, rotor, and appliance of an aircraft. The records must include

--11 (i) A description (or reference to data acceptable to the Administrator) of the work performed; and (ii) The date of completion of the work performed; and (iii) The signature, and certificate number of the person approving the aircraft for return to service. (2) Records containing the following information: (i) The total time in service of the airframe, each engine, each propeller, and each rotor. (ii) Th e current status of life

- limited parts of each airframe, engine, propeller, rotor, and appliance. (iii) The time since last overhaul of all items installed on the aircraft which are required to be overhauled on a specified time basis. (iv) The current in spection status of the aircraft, including the time since the last inspection required by the inspection program under which the aircraft and its appliances are maintained. (v) The current status of applicable airworthiness directives (AD) and safety dire ctives including, for each, the method of compliance, the AD or safety directive number and revision date. If the AD or safety directive involves recurring action, the time and date when the next action is required. (vi) Copies of the forms prescribed b y § 43.9(d) of this chapter for each major alteration to the airframe and currentl y installed engines, rotors, propellers, and appliances. (b) The owner or operator shall retain the following records for the periods prescribed: (1) The records specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall be retained until the work is repeated or superseded b y other work or for 1 ye ar after the work is performed. (2) The records specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section shall be retained and transferred with the aircraft at the time the aircraft is sold. (3) A list of defects furnished to a registered owner or operator under § 43.11 of this chapter shall be retained until the defects are repaired and the aircraft is approved for return to service.12

**C. The Extent Of Relief**  **Matthew J. Hummel Seeks And The Reason**  **Matthew J**  **. Hummel**  **Seeks The Relief. 1. Extent Of Relief**  **Matthew J. Hummel Seeks And The Reason**  Matthew J. Hummel **Seeks Relief From Section 61.113(a) And (b).** Relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b) entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in command, is requested to the extent necessary to allow a PI C holding a private pilot or higher level certificate, as well as a current and valid airman medical certificate, and who has met certain flight

- h our and currency requirements, to conduct the proposed UAS flight operations for compensation or hire. This relief is requested since the limitations set forth in Section 61.113(a) and (b) state that a private pilot may , for compensation or hire, act as P IC of an aircraft in connection with any business or emplo ym ent if: (1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employ

ment; and (2) The aircraft does not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire. As set forth more full y below, Matthew J. Hummel submits that an equivalent level of safety will be maintained because no PIC will be allowed to operate the DJI Phantom 2 Vision UAS unless that PIC has met certain flight

- hour and currency requirements, demonstrating that the PIC is able to safel y operate the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS in a manner consistent with the operations specifications as described in this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers, as well as maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures. Further, Matthew J. Hummel submits that all flights of the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS , conducted b y the PIC pursuant to the grant of this Petition: (1) will be incidental to13

Matthew J. Hummel ’s business; and (2) will not carry passengers or property

for compensation or hire. **2. Extent Of Relief** Matthew J. Hummel **Seeks And The Reason** Matthew J. Hummel **Seeks Relief From Section 91.7(a).** Relief from Section 91.7(a) entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness , is requested to the extent required to allow Matthew J. Hummel to determine that the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS is in airworthy

condition prior to every

flight by ensuring that the UAS is in compliance with the operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenanc e Log, and DJ I Phantom 2 Vision Instruction Manual). Matthew J. Hummel seeks the requested relief because the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS do es not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. Therefore, Matthew J. Hummel will ensure that the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS is in airworthy

condition based upon its compliance with the operating documents (i.e ., Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJ I Phantom 2 Vision Instruction Manual) prior to every flight, and further, determine th at the aircraft is in condition for safe flight, as stated in the conditions and limitations below. **3. Extent Of Relief Matthew J. Hummel**  **Seeks And The Reason** Matthew J. Hummel **Seeks Relief From Section 91.121.** Relief from Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter settings , may be required to allow flight operations of the DJIPhantom 2 Vision UAS , which utilize a barometric pressure sensor, GPS equipment, and a radio communications telemetry data link to downlink altitude information from the UA to the PI C at the ground control station (GCS). Since the FAA requires that an y altitude information concerning UAS operations be reported to air traffic control (ATC) in feet above ground level (AGL), Matthew J. Hummel seeks the requested relief because the DJ I Ph antom 2 Vision UA altimeter may be set on the ground14

to zero feet AGL, rather than the local barometric pressure or field altitude, before each flight. Considering the limited altitude of the proposed operations, relief from 14 CFR 91.121 is sought to the extent necessary to comply

with the applicable conditions and limitations stated below. As more full y set forth herein, an equivalent level of safety will be maintained since the DJIPhantom 2 Vision UA is equipped with a barometric pressure sensor and GP S equipment, which automatically ensures that a ground level pressure setting will be established prior to each flight, and provides the PI C with altitude information of the UA on the heads

- up display of the GCS. **4. Extent Of Relief** Matthew J. Hummel **Seek s And The Reason**  Matthew J. Hummel **Seeks Relief From Section 91.151(b).** Relief from Section 91.151(b) entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions , is requested to the extent required to allow flights of the battery powered DJ I Phantom 2 Visio n UA during daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC), under visual flight rules (VFR), for a total duration of 13.5 minutes to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fl y after that for at least 4.5 minut es. Matthew J. Hummel seeks the requested relief because without an exemption from Section 91.151(b), the flight time duration of the battery powered DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UA will severel y constrain the practicality of an y aerial video or still photo flight operations that Matthew J. Hummel proposes to conduct pursuant to this Petition. Significantl y, as set forth below, the technical specifications of the DJ I Phantom 2 Visio n UAS , the DJIPhantom 2 Vision operating documents, and Matthew J. Hummel’s proposed operating limitations, ensure that Matthew J. Hummel will safely operate the battery powered DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UA during daylight hours in visual meteorological15

condi tions (VMC), under visual flight rules (VFR), with enough battery power to fl y for a total duration of 13.5 minutes to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fl y after that for at least 4.5 minutes. **5. Extent Of Relief** Matthew J. Hummel **Seeks And The Reason** Matthew J. Hummel **Seeks Relief From Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), And 91.417(a) & (b).**  Since Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) only appl y to airc raft with an airworthiness certificate, Matthew J. Hummel requests relief from these Sections because the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS do es not require airworthiness certificates. As set forth more fully below, the DJI Phantom 2 Vision UAS meet s the conditions of FMRA Section 333 for operation without an airworthiness certificate. Accordingl y, Matthew J. Hummel will use trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UASs using the methods, techniques, and practices pre scribed in the UAS operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJIPhantom 2 Vision). Furthermore, Matthew J. Hummel will document and maintain all maintenance records for the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS

. **D. The Reasons Why Granting Matthew J.**  **Hummel ’s**  **Request Would Be In The Public Interest; That Is, How It Would Benefit The Public As A Whole.**  Granting the present Petition will further the public interest b y allowing Matthew J. Hummel to safel y, efficiently , and economicall y perform aerial video and photography of construction sites, roof tops, real estate, and landscape over certain areas of the United States. Additionally , use of the DJIPhantom 2 Vision UAS will decrease congestion of the NAS, reduce pollution, and provide significant b enefits to the econom y. Notably, the16

benefits of Matthew J. Hummel ’s proposed operation of the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS will be realized without implicating any privacy issues. **1. The Public Will Benefit From Decreased Congestion Of The NAS.** The DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UA is battery powered and serve s as a safe, efficient, and economical alternative to the manned aircraft traditionally utilized to obtain aerial imagery . By

reducing the amount of manned aircraft needed to perform aerial acquisitions, an exemp tion allowing the use of a DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS would reduce the amount of manned aircraft in the NAS, reduce noise and air pollution, as well as increase the safety of life and property in the air and on the ground. Furthermore, b y reducing the numbe r of manned aircraft operating in the NAS, congestion around airports caused b y arriving and departing aircraft will be reduced. The DJIPhantom 2 Vision UA do es not require an airport to takeoff or land. L ikewise, a reduction of manned aircraft conducting aerial video and photography missions would result in fewer aircraft that must be handled b y air traffic control during the ground, takeoff, departure, arrival, and landing phases of flight operations. **2. The Public Will Benefit From The Safety And Efficiency Of The DJI**  **Phantom 2 Vision UAS**  **.** Conducting aerial acquisitions with the DJIPhantom 2 Vision UAS , instead of manned aircraft, will greatly benefit the public by drasticall y reducing the levels of air and noise pollution generated during traditional aerial video and still photography flight operations. By

using battery

power and electric motors, the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS produce s no air pollution, and is the most viable environmentally conscious alternative to the cabin class, six cylinder internal combustion engine aircraft that are typ ically utilized for aerial video and photograph y, while burning approximately 20

- 30 gallons per hour of17

leaded aviation fuel. The DJIPhantom 2 Vision UA , while reducing the carbon footprint of aerial acquisitions, also eliminates noise pollution, as the UAs are propelled by battery powered electric motors, rather than an internal combustion engine. By using the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS to perform aerial acquisitions, the substantial risk to life and property in the air and on the ground, which is usually associated with traditional manned aircraft flight operations, will be substantially reduced or completel y eliminated. Aside from the lack of flight crew members located onboard the aircraft, the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UA (weighing approximately 2 pounds 11 ounces, at its maximum gross weight with a length of 16 inches, widths of 16 inches, and with no fuel on board), has less phy sical potential for collateral damage to life and property on the ground, and in the air, compared to the manned aircraft that typicall y conduct similar operations (weighing approximately 6,000 pounds with a wingspan of approximately 42 feet, a length of 34 feet, and a fuel capacity of 180 gallons). **3. Performing Aerial Video and Photography Operations With The DJI Phantom 2 Vision UA**  **S Will Benefit The Economy.**  In addition to being safe and efficient, the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS is also an economical alternative to using manned aircraft to conduct similar aerial operations. As such, operation of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision UAS will allow United States based companies, like Matthew J. Hummel ’s , to remain competitive and contribute to growth of the U.S. econom y. Specifically, with the rising cost of aviation fuel and the Environmental Protection Agency

(“EPA”) regulatory

actions phasing out leaded aviation fuels, U.S. owned and operated companies must adopt new and alternative technology in order to remain competitive. Operating the battery powered DJIPhantom 2 Vision UASs is one such technology

that not only

allows companies greater operational flexibility compared to18

manned aircraft, but provides such flexibility without the high operat ional cost of a traditional manned aircraft. By operating the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS , companies such as Matthew J. Hummel ’s , can remain competitive and profitable, and therefore, provide greater job stability to employees and contractors, which will ult imately contribute to growth of the U.S. economy . Improved financial performance of U.S. companies, through commercial use of the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS , provides a stable workforce that increases consumer spending; improves local, state, and federal tax revenues; and allows companies to invest in research and development in order to remain competitive both in the United States and abroad. **4. There Are No Privacy Issues.** Similar to the manned aerial acquisition flight operations that have been conducted for decades, Matthew J. Hummel ’s proposed operation of the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS will not implicate any

privacy issues. Specificall y, the DJIPhantom 2 Vision UAS will be operated onl y in compliance with operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance L og, and DJ I Phantom 2 Vision) which requires property owner involvement as well as local law enforcement notification, and in accordance with the Federal Aviation Regulations, including the minimum altitude requirements of 14 C.F.R. § 91.119. **E. The Reasons Why Granting The Exemption Would Not Adversely Affect Safety, Or How The Exemption Would Provide A Level Of Safety At Least Equal To That**  **Provided By The Rule From Which Matthew J. Hummel**  **Seeks Exemption.**  **1. Reasons Why The DJI Phantom 2 Vision**  **UA Meet**  **s The Conditions Of The**  **FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) Section 333.** In consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the unmanned aircraft and its operation, Matthew J. Hummel ’s operation of the DJ I19

Phantom 2 Vision UAS meet s the conditions of FMRA Section 333, and will not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. Section 333 provides authority for a UAS to operate without airw orthiness certification and sets forth requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security. Specificall y, FMRA Section 333 states the following, in part: (a ) In General.

--Notwithstanding any other requirement of this subtitle, and not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall determine if certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airspace system before completion of the plan and rulemaking required by section 332 of this Act or the guidance required by section 334 of this Act. (b ) Assessment of Unmanned Aircraft Systems.

--In making the determination under subsection (a), the Secretary shall determine, at a minimum

-- (1 ) which types of unmanned aircraft systems, if any, as a result of their size, weight, speed, operational capability, proximity to airports and populated areas, and operation within visual line of sight do not create a hazard to users of the national airspace system or the public or pose a threat to national security; and (2 ) whether a certificate of waiver, certificate of authorization, or airworthiness certification under section 44704 of title 49, United States Code, is required for the operation of unmanned aircraft systems identified under paragraph (1). (c) Requirements for Safe Operation.

--If the Secretary determines under this section that certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the na tional airspace system, the Secretary shall establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems in the national airspace system. In seeking this exemption, Matthew J. Hummel submits that the DJIPhantom 2 Vision UAS can operate safel y in the NAS pursuant to FMRA Section 333, as demonstrated b y: (a) the characteristics of the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS ; (b) the pilot certification requirement; and (c) the specific operating limitations.20 **a. The Specifications Of The DJI**  **Phantom 2 Vision UAS Demonstrate Its**  **Safe Characteristics.** The DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS do es not create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security considering its size, weight, speed, and operational capability

.

**i. Technical Specifications Of The DJI Phantom 2 Vision**  **UAS.** The technical specifications of the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS is set forth by the DJIPhantom 2 Vision Specifications and Data Sheet, attached hereto as Exhibit A.

**ii. The DJI Phantom 2 Vision**  **UAS Autonomous Flight And Navigation Modes Enable The UASs To Remain Within A Defined**  **Operational Area.**  The DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS may be operated in both manual and fully autonomous flight modes. A complete description of the flight and navigational modes of the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS is provided at pages 25

- 35 of the DJ I Phantom 2 V ision and pages 12

- 16 User Manual , attached hereto as Exhibit B
.

**iii. The DJI Phantom 2 Vision**  **UAS is**  **Designed For Automatic Return To Home Point Or Hover In The Event Of Loss Of The Control**  **Link Or Navigation.** When the Control L ink is lost, the DJI Phantom 2 Vision UA will remain stationary , in flight, for 3 seconds or more. If, after 3 seconds, the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UA do es not reacquire control link data from the GCS, the UAs will assume that the Control L ink is lost and the UAs will return to the home position (i.e., failsafe mode) via GPS, and will descend to the takeoff position and shutdown. A complete description of the Failsafe Functions of the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS are set forth at pages 32 through 34 of the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision User M anual , attached hereto as Exhibit B
.21 **iv. The DJI Phantom 2 Vision**  **GCS And Its Operation.** A complete description of the operation and specifications of the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision GCS and flight control software is provided at pages 32 through 43 of the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision User Manual. DJ I Phantom 2 Vision User Manual is att ached hereto as Exhibits B

.

**b. Flight Operations Of DJI Phantom 2 Vision**  **UAS is Limited To The Line**  **Of Sight Of A Certificated Pilot in Command With A Safety Observer.** Matthew J. Hummel will only utilize certificated pilots who possess a current and valid airman medical certificate to act as a pilot in command (PI C) of the DJIPhantom 2 Vision UAS . Additionally, a safety observer will assist all pilots during flight time

.

**c. Flights Of DJI Phantom 2 Vision**  **UAS Will Be Conducted Pursuant To**  **Specific Operating Limitations.** In seeking this exemption, Matthew J. Hummel proposes to commercially operate DJIPhantom 2 Vision UAS for the special purpose of conducting aerial vi deo and photograph y over certain areas of United States, pursuant to the following specific operating limitations: 1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption will be limited to the following aircraft described in the operating documents, rotorcraf t UASs weighing less than 55 pounds maximum gross weight: DJ I Phantom 2 Vision Unmanned Aircraft Sy stems. Proposed operations of any other aircraft will require a new petition or a petition to amend this grant. 2. UAS operations under this exemption will be limited to conducting operations for the purpose of aerial video and photography. 3. The UAs may

not be flown at an indicated airspeed exceeding 20 knots. 4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 4 00 feet above ground level (AGL), as indicated by the procedures specified in the operating documents unless a special request is made and approved b y ATC. All altitudes reported to ATC must be in feet AGL. 5. The UA must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PI C at all t imes. This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by an y22 device other than corrective lenses, as specified on the PI C’s FAA

- issued airman medical certificate. 6. The use of first person view (FPV) b y the PI C or safety observer (SO) is not permitted. 7. All operations must utilize a safety observer (SO). The SO may be used to satisfy the VLOS requirement as long as the PIC alway s maintains VL OS capability

. The SO and PI C must be able to communicate verbally at all times. Electronic messaging or texting is not permitted during flight operations. The PIC must be designated before the flight and cannot transfer his or her designation for the duration of the flight. The PI C must ensure that the SO can perform the functions prescribed in the operating documents. 8. The SO must not perform any other duties beyond assisting the PI C with seeing and avoiding other air traffic and other ground based obstacles/obstruction s and is not permitted to operate the camera or other instruments. 9. The operating documents and the grant of exemption must be accessible during UAS operations and made available to the Administrator upon request. If a discrepancy

exists between the co nditions and limitations contained in the grant of exemption and the procedures outlined in the operating documents, the conditions and limitations contained in the grant of exemption take precedence and must be followed. Otherwise, the operator must follo w the procedures as outlined in its operating documents. The operator may update or revise its operating documents. It is the operator’s responsibility to track such revisions and present updated and revised documents to the Administrator upon request. The operator must also present updated and revised documents if it petitions for extension or amendment to the grant of exemption. If the operator determines that any update or revision would affect the basis upon which the FAA granted the exemption, then the operator must petition for amendment to its grant of exemption. The FAA’s UAS Integration Office (AFS

- 80) may be contacted if questions arise regarding updates or revisions to the operating documents. 10. Prior to each flight the PI C must inspect the UA S to ensure that it is in a condition for safe flight. If the inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the UAS, the aircraft is prohibited from operating until the necessary maintenance has been performed and the UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight. The Ground Control Station must be included in the preflight inspection. All maintenance and alterations must be properl y documented in the aircraft records. 11. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS operation or flight characteristics, e.g. replacement of a flight critical component, must undergo a functional test flight. The PI C who conducts the functional test flight must make an entry in the aircraft records.23 12. The pre

- flight ins pection must account for all potential discrepancies, e.g. inoperable components, items, or equipment, not already covered in the relevant sections of the operating documents. 13. The operator must follow the UAS manufacturer’s aircraft/component, mainte nance, overhaul, replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements. 14. The operator must carry out its maintenance, inspections, and record keeping requirements, in accordance with the operating documents. Maintenance, inspection, alterations, and st atus of replacement/overhaul component parts must be noted in the aircraft records, including total time in service, description of work accomplished, and the signature of the authorized person returning the UAS to service. 15. Each UAS operated under th is exemption must comply with all manufacturer Safety Bulletins. 16. The authorized person must make an entry in the aircraft record of the corrective action taken against discrepancies discovered between inspections. 17. The PI C must possess at least a private pilot certificate and at least a current third

- class medical certificate. 18. The operator may

not permit any

PIC to operate unless the PI C meets the operator’s qualification criteria and demonstrates the ability to safel y operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated under the exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from persons, vessels, vehicles and structures. PIC qualification flight hours must be logged in a manner consistent with 14 C.F.R. § 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of training the operator’s PICs are permitted under the terms of the exemption. However, training operations may only be conducted during dedicated training sessions. During training, profi ciency , and experience

- building flights, all persons not essential for flight operations are considered nonparticipants, and the PI C must operate the UA with appropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 91.119. 19. UAS operations may

not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 C.F.R. § 1.1. All operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). If flight at night is required, a special request will be made at the FAA office closest to proposed area of operations. Flights under special visual flight rules (SVFR) are not authorized. 20. The UA may

not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airport reference point as denoted on a current FAA

- published aeronautical chart unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s management is obtained, and the operation is conducted in accordance with a NOTAM as required by the operator’s COA.24 The letter of agreement with the airport management must be made available to the Administrator upon request

. 21. The UA may

not be operated more than 5 00 feet below or less than 2 ,000 feet horizontally

from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PI C. 22. If the UA loses communications or loses its GPS signal, it must return to a pre determined location within the planned operating area and land or be recovered in accordance with the operating documents. 23. The PI C must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies in accordance with the operating document s. 24. The PI C is prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough power to fly at normal cruising speed to the intended landing point and land the UA with 25% battery power remaining. 25. The operator must obtain an Air Traffic Organization (ATO) issued Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA) prior to conducting any operations under the grant of exemption. This COA will also require the operator to request a Notice to Airman (NOTAM) not m ore than 72 hours in advance, but not less than 48 hours prior to the operation. All operations shall be conducted in accordance with airspace requirements in the ATO issued COA including class of airspace, altitude level and potential transponder requirem ents. 26. All aircraft operated in accordance with the exemption must be identified by serial number, registered in accordance with 14 C.F.R. part 47, and have identification (N

- Number) markings in accordance with 14 C.F.R. part 45, Subpart C. Markings must be as large as practicable. 27. Before conducting operations, the radio frequency spectrum used for operation and control of the UA must comply with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) or other appropriate government oversight agency require ments. 28. The documents required fewer than 14 C.F.R. 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to the PIC at the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the UAS is operating. These documents must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request. 29. The UA must remain clear and yi eld the right of way to all manned aviation operations and activities at all times. 30. The UAS may

not be operated b y the PIC from any moving device or vehicle.25 31. Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating persons (persons other than the PI C, SO, operator trainees or essential persons), vessels, vehicles, and structures unless: a. Barriers or structures are present that suf ficiently protect nonparticipating persons from the UA and/or debris in the event of an accident. The operator must ensure that nonparticipating persons remain under such protection. If a situation arises where nonparticipating persons leave such protectio n and are within 500 feet of the UA, flight operations must cease immediately

and/or; b. The aircraft is operated near vessels, vehicles or structures where the owner/controller of such vessels, vehicles or structures has granted permission and the PI C h as made a safety assessment of the risk of operating closer to those objects and determined that it does not present an undue hazard, and; c. Operations nearer to the PI C, SO, operator trainees or essential persons do not present an undue hazard to those persons per § 91.119(a). 32. All operations shall be conducted over private or controlled

- access property with permission from the land owner/controller or authorized representative. Permission from land owner/controller or authorized representative wil l be obtained for each flight to be conducted. 33. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported to the FAA's UAS Integration Off ice (AFS

- 80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) per instructions contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov

. **2. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 61.113(a)**  **And (b) Would Not Adversely Affect Safety.** Matthew J. Hummel submits that the equivalent level of safety established by Section 61.113(a) and (b) will be maintained because no PI C will be allowed to o perate the DJIPhantom 2 Vision UAS unless that PI C has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight

hour and currency

requirements, that the PI C is able to safel y operate the DJIPhantom 2 Vision UAS in a manner consistent with the exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures.26 Considering Matthew J. Hummel ’s proposed area of operations, and the operating limitations set forth

- above; the parallel nature of private pilot aeronautical knowledge requirements to those of commercial pilot requirements ( See Exemption No. 11062); and the airmanship skills necessary to safel y operate the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS, Matthew J. Hummel submits that the additional manned airmanship exp erience of a commerciall y certificated pilot would not correlate to the airmanship skills necessary for Matthew J. Hummel’ s specific proposed flight operations. The FAA has previously

granted relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b) specific to UAS, in circ umstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161). Matthew J. Hummel will not al low any PIC to operate the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS unless that PI C has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight

- hour requirements or the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS training and currency requirements, that the PI C is able to safel y operate the DJ I Phantom 2 V ision UAS in a manner consistent with this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures. Specificall y, the PI C must have accumulated and logged, in a manner consistent with 14 C.F.R. § 61.51(b), 25 hours of total time as a UAS rotorcraft pilot (with a minimum of 5 hours of those hours as a UAS pilot operating the same make and model of UAS to be used for operations under the exemption). In addition to the hour requirements, the PI C must accomplish 3 takeoffs and landings in the preceding 90 day s (for currency purposes).27 As in Exemption Nos. 11062, 11138, and 11153, prior documented flight expe rience that was obtained in compliance with applicable regulations will ensure an equivalent level of safety during Matthew J. Hummel ’s proposed operations. The Administrator has held that prior documented flight experience that was obtained in compliance with applicable regulations would ensure safe operations, stating as follows: In Exemption No. 11062, the FAA required that prior to c onducting operations for the purpose of motion picture filming (or similar operations), the PIC must have accumulated and logged, in a manner consistent with 14 CFR 61.51(b), 25 hours of total time as a UAS rotorcraft pilot including at least 10 hours logg ed as a UAS pilot with a multi

- rotor UAS. Prior to operations under Exemption No. 11062, the PI C must also have accumulated and logged a minimum of 5 hours as a UAS pilot operating the same make and model of UAS to be used for operations under the exemptio n. For clarification, the FAA considers these minimum hour requirements to be inclusive rather than additive; i.e. 5 hours make and model time may be included in the 10 hours of multi

- rotor time and the 10 hours may be included in the total 25 hours of UAS rotorcraft time. In addition to the hour requirements, the PI C must accomplish 3 takeoffs and landings in the preceding 90 day s (for currency purposes). The FAA finds that at a minimum, the flight

- hour requirements in Exemption No. 11062 are appropriate t o practice and build proficiency in the skills necessary

to safely conduct the petitioner’s proposed operations. The FAA also finds that prior documented flight experience that was obtained in compliance with applicable regulations would satisfy this requi rement. Training, proficiency , and experience

- building flights can also be conducted under the grant of exemption to accomplish the required flight time. During training, proficiency , and experience

- building flights the PI C is required to operate the UA wi th appropriate distances in accordance with 14 C.F.R 91.119. Exemption No. 11138 at page 15. Accordingl y, Matthew J. Hummel will ensure safe operations b y not allowing any PI C to operate the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS unless that PI C has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight

- hour and currency requirements, that the PI C is able to safel y operate the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS in a manner consistent with the exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from peopl e, vessels, vehicles and structures.28 **3. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.7(a)**  **Would Not Adversely Affect Safety.** The equivalent level of safety established b y Section 91.7(a) will be maintained because prior to every

flight, Matthew J. Hummel will ensure that the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS is in an airworthy condition based upon the UAS’s compliance with its operating documents and as stated in the conditions and limitations herein. Additionally , the FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.7(a) specific to UAS, in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161). **4. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.121 Would Not Adversely Affect Safety.**  The equivalent level of safety established b y Section 91.121 will be maintained because the altitude information of the D JIPhantom 2 Vision UA will be provided to the PI C via GPS equipment and a radio communications telemetry data link, which downlinks from the UA to the GCS for active monitoring of the flight path and altitude. This altitude information, combined with Matthew J. Hummel ’ s operation of the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UA within vis ual line of sight, at or below 4 00 feet AGL , will ensure a level of safety equivalent to Section 91.121. The altitude information will be generated b y GPS equipment installed onboard the ai rcraft. Prior to each flight, a zero altitude initiation point is automatically

established by

the UASs at ground level. The FAA has previously

granted relief from Section 91.121 specific to UAS, in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to thos e presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).29 **5. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.151(b) Would Not**  **Adversely Affect Safety.** A grant of this exemption would ensure an equivalent level of safety established by 14 C.F.R. Section 91.151(b) as a result of (1) the technical specifications of the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS ; (2) the limitations on the proposed flight operations; and (3) the location of the proposed flight operations. Accordingl y, Matthew J. Hummel will ensure that it will safely

operate the battery

powered DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UA during daylight hours in VFR conditions, with enough battery power to fl y for a total duration of 13.5 minutes to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fl y after that for at least 4.5 minutes. Here, as in Exemption N o. 11109, the technical specifications of the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS ; the limitations on the proposed flight operations; and the location of the proposed operations, will ensure an equivalent level of safety established by 14 C.F.R. Section 91.151(b). Furthermore, safety will be ensured as the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS provide audible and visual warnings to the PI C at the GCS when the UAs experiences low battery voltage, the first warning occurring at approximately 33% remaining battery

power, and again at approximately 10% remaining battery power. At the criticall y low battery level, the DJ I Phantom Vision UAS will descend and land automatically

. Significantl y, previous exemptions granted b y the FAA concerning Section 91.151 establish that safety is not a dversel y affected when the technical characteristics and operating limitations of the UAS are considered. Relief has been granted for manned aircraft to operate at less than the minimums prescribed in Section 91.151, including Exemption Nos. 2689, 5745, an d 10650. Moreover, the FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.151 specific to UAS, in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to30

those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 8811, 10808, 10673, 11042, 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 1 1067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161). **6. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), And 91.417(a) & (b) Would**  **Not Adversely Affect Safety.**  In seeking this exemption, Matthew J. Hummel submits that the equivalent level of safety with regard to the regulatory maintenance and alteration requirements established by Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) will be met because Matthew J. Hummel will use trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations, or pr eventive maintenance on the UAS using the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed in the operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Lo g, and DJ I Phantom 2 Vision Instruction Manual). Furthermore, Matthew J. Hummel will document and maintain all maintenance records for the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS

. Since the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS will be inspected as prescribed b y the operating documents, Matthew J. Hummel will maintain the equivalent level of safety established by

Sections 91.405(a), 91.409(a)(1), and 91.409(a)(2). A copy of the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision User Manual is attached hereto as Exhibit B ; a copy of the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS Maintenance LOG is attached hereto as Exhibit C

. Likewise, the exemption sought will not adversel y affect safety because Matthew J. Hummel will use trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations or preventive maintenance on the UAS using the meth ods, techniques, and practices prescribed by the operating documents. Furthermore, the exemption sought would maintain an equivalent level of safety established by

Sections 91.407, 91.417(a) and 91.417(b), because all maintenance of the31

DJIPhantom 2 Visi on UAS will be performed b y trained technicians. Maintenance will be documented and maintained utilizing the monthly maintenance log. Significantl y, previous exemptions granted b y the FAA concerning Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) establish that safety is not adversel y affected when the technical characteristics and operating limitations of the UAS are considered. In consideration of Matthew J. Hummel ’s proposed operating limitations, the operating documents, and the technical aspects of the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS , Matthew J. Hummel submits that safety will not be adversel y affected b y granting exemption from 14 C.F.R. Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1) and (a)(2), 91.409(a)(2), and 91.417(a) and (b). The FAA has previousl y granted relief specific to UAS in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161). **7. The FAA May Prescribe Any Other Conditions F or Safe Operation.**  In accordance with Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) and 14 C.F.R. § 21.16 entitled Special Conditions , Matthew J. Hummel requests that the FAA prescribe special conditions for the intended operation of the DJIPhantom 2 Vision UAS , which contain such safety standards that the Administrator finds necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H, and 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7 (a), 91.121, 91.15 1(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b). Such special conditions will permit safe operation of the UAs for the limited purpose of conducting aerial video and photography32

over certain areas of the United States for compensation or hire. FMRA Section 333 sets forth the requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security ; and further, provides the authority for such UAS to operate wi thout airworthiness certification in accordance with any requirements that must be established for the safe operation of the UAS in the NAS. Likewise, the Administrator may prescribe special conditions pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 21.16, for operation of the D JIPhantom 2 Vision UAS , since the airworthiness regulations of 14 C.F.R. Part 21 do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards, due to the novel or unusual design features of the aircraft. Section 21.16, entitled Special Conditions , states the f

ollowing: If the FAA finds that the airworthiness regulations of this subchapter do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for an aircraft, aircraft engine, or propeller because of a novel or unusual design feature of the aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller, he prescribes special conditions and amendments thereto for the product. The special conditions are issued in accordance with Part 11 of this chapter and contain such safety

standards for the aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller as the FAA finds necessary

to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established in the regulations. See 14 C.F.R. § 21.16. Therefore, in accordance with FMRA Section 333 and 14 C.F.R. § 21.16, the FAA may prescribe special conditions for Total Building Analy sis, LLC ’s intended operation of the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS , which contain such safety standards that the Administrator finds necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established b y 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H, and 14 C.F.R S ections 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b). **F. A Summary That Can Be Published In The**  **Federal Register, stating: The Rules**  **From Which Matthew J. Hummel**  **Seeks Exemption:**33 Matthew J. Hummel seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a)&(b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a )(2), and 91.417(a) & (b). **A Brief Description Of The Nature Of The Exemption Matthew J. Hum**  **mel Seeks:**  This exemption will permit Matthew J. Hummel to commercially operate an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) for the purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the United States. **G. Any Additional Information, Views, Or Arguments Available To Support**  **Matthew J. Hummel ’s**  **Request.** This Petition is made pursuant to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) Section 333, which directs the Secretary of Transportation to determine if certain UAS may operate safely

in the NAS. As such, Matthew J. Hummel ’s request for exemption may

be granted pursuant to the authority of FMRA Section 333 and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, as set forth above. FMRA Section 333 sets forth the requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security; and further, provides the authority for such UAS to operate without airworthiness certification. As discussed in detail above, Matthew J. Hummel will operate the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS safel y in the NAS, without creating a hazard to users of the NAS, or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security

. **CONCLUSION** As set forth herein, Matthew J. Hummel seeks an exemption pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 11.61 and Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), which will permit safe operation of the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision UAS commercially , without34

an airworthiness certificate, for the limited purpose of conducting aerial video and photograph y over certain areas of the United States. By granting this Petition, the FAA Administrator will be fulfilling the Congressional mandate o f the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, while also advancing the interests of the public, b y allowing Matthew J. Hummel to safely , efficiently , and economically operate the DJIPhantom 2 Vision UAS commerciall y within the NAS. **WHEREFORE** , in accord ance with the Federal Aviation Regulations and the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Section 333, Matthew J. Hummel respectfull y requests that the Administrator grant this Petition for an exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113( a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), and permit Matthew J. Hummel to operate the DJIPhantom 2 Vision UAS commerciall y for the purpose of conducting aerial video and photograph y over certain areas of the United States. Date d: February

10 , 201 6

Respectfully submitted, Matthew J. Hummel

_________________________ Matthew J. Hummel (FAA# FA3CTCPML T) 4 9 36 Narbeck Ave. Everett , WA 98203 Tel: ( 206 ) 992

- 0462
Appendic es :35

A

– DJ I Phantom 2 Vision Specifications Data Sheet B

– DJ I Phantom 2 Vision Manufacturer’s User Manual C

– Monthly

Maintenance L og

EXHIBIT

– A **DJI PHANTOM 2 VISION TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS**  Matthew J. Hummel only utilizes safe and reliable UASs. DJIis an industry leader in small UAS production. DJ I UASs are loaded with ground breaking software enabling the user to set parameters which will not allow flight into controlled airspace. Parameter s can also be set to limit flight to no higher than a predetermined and set altitude as well as limit f l ight to a predetermined and set distance. In addition, DJ I software provides real

- time altitude and location information to the PI C via the linked monit or (smart phone/tablet devices) 1.1 DJIPhantom 2 Vision 1.1.1 Aircraft 1.1.1.1 Supported Battery

– DJ I 5200mAH LiPo Battery 1.1.1.2 Weight (Battery

& Propellers Included)

– 2lbs 11.810oz (1242g) 1.1.1.3 Hover Accuracy

(Ready to Fl y)

– Vertical: .8m; Ho rizontal: 2.5m 1.1.1.4 Max Yaw Angular Velocity - 200 0 /s 1.1.1.5 Max Tilt Angel

- 35 0 1.1.1.6 Max Ascent Speed

– 6m/s 1.1.1.7 Max Descent Speed

– 2m/s 1.1.1.8 Max Flight Speed

– 15m/s (NOT RECOMMENDED) 1.1.2 Gimbal 1.1.2.1 Working Current

– Static: 750mA; Dy namic: 900mA 1.1.2.2 Control Accuracy

- ±0.03 0 1.1.2.3 Controllable Range

– Pitch:

- 90 0
- 0 0 1.1.2.4 Maximum Angular Speed

– Pitch: 90 0 /s 1.1.3 Camera 1.1.3.1 Operating Temperature Range

- 32 0 F
- 104 0 F (0 0 C

- 40 0 C) 1.1.3.2 Sensor Size

– 1/2.3” 1.1.3.3 Effective Pixels

– 14M 1.1.3.4 Resolution

– 4384x3288 4.1.3.5 HD Video Recording

– 1080p30 & 720p 4.1.3.6 Recording Field of View

- 110 0 /85 0 1.1.4 Transmitter 1.1.4.1 Operating Frequency

– 5.728GHz

– 5.85GHz36 1.1.4.2 Communication Distance (unobstructed)

– FCC Compliance: 800m 1.1.4.3 Receiver Sensitivity (1%PER)

- - 93dBm 1.1.4.4 Transmitter Power

– FCC Compliance: 100mW 1.1.4.5 Working Voltage

– 120mA@3.7V 1.1.5 Range Extender 1.1.5.1 Operating Frequency

– 2412

- 2462MHz 1.1.5.2 Communication Distance (unob structed)

– 500

- 700m 1.1.5.3 Transmitter Power

– 20dBm 1.1.5.4 Power Consumption

– 2W

EXHIBIT

– B DJIPhantom 2 Vision Manufacturer’s User Manual

EXHIBIT

– C

m o n t h :

__ ___ __ __ ( y e a r :

__ ___ __ _ **U A**  **S $**  **# :**  **$**

**_ _** **_ _** **_ _** **_ _**  **_ _** **_** D a t e ( I s s u e ( D i s c o v e r e d D a t e ( I s s u e (

A d d r e s s e d S o ft w a r e ( U p d a t e s
A i r f r a m e (
E n g i n e s
P r o p e l l e r s
C a m e r a (G i m b a l
L a n d i n g ( G e a r
V i b r a t i o n ( D a m p e n i n g
O t h e r : **M O**  **N T**  **H L** **Y $**  **M A**  **I N**  **T E**  **N A**  **N C**  **E $** 

**L O**  **G**

I s s u e ( D e s c r i p t i o n (

& ( M a i n t e n a n c e ( C o n d u c t e d M a i n t e n a n c e ( P e r f o r m e d ( B y : ( ( ( P r i n t ( & (S i g n