alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 24.1
                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

  KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears
below hereby constitutes and appoints Mark R. Rutenberg, Uzi Ish-Hurwitz, David
Duncan, Jr. and John B. Henneman III, and each of them, as his true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, with full powers of
substitution and resubstitution, for him in his name, place and stead, in any
and all capacities, to sign the 1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Neuromedical
Systems, Inc. (the "Corporation"), filed pursuant to Section 13 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and any and all documents in connection
therewith, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and any and all
amendments and any further documents in connection therewith, with the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact
and agents full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and
thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully as
he might or could do in person, and hereby ratifies, approves and confirms all
that his said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or his substitute
or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

  Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission Rule
12b-11, this Power of Attorney for the execution of the Corporation's 1996
Annual Report on Form 10-K has been signed by the following persons on the dates
indicated, each in their respective capacities as members of the Corporation's
board of directors:

  /s/ Mark R. Rutenberg                   March 26, 1997
  ____________________________            ____________________________
  Mark R. Rutenberg                       Date

  /s/ Elizabeth Cogan Fascitelli          March 27, 1997
  ____________________________            ____________________________
  Elizabeth Cogan Fascitelli              Date

  /s/ Stuart M. Essig                     March 26, 1997
  ____________________________            ____________________________
  Stuart M. Essig                         Date

  /s/ Carl Genberg                        March 27, 1997
  ____________________________            ____________________________
  Carl Genberg                            Date

  /s/ Dr. Arthur L. Herbst                March 27, 1997
  ____________________________            ____________________________
  Dr. Arthur L. Herbst                    Date

  /s/ Uzi Ish-Hurwitz                     March 27, 1997
  ____________________________            ____________________________
  Uzi Ish-Hurwitz                         Date

  /s/ C. Raymond Larkin, Jr.              March 27, 1997
  ____________________________            ____________________________
  C. Raymond Larkin, Jr.                  Date

  /s/ Stephen Ng, M.D.                    March 26, 1997
  ____________________________            ____________________________
  Stephen Ng, M.D.                        Date
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ZEEV VINIK and JANY VINIK,

Appellants,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-734

[February 21, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Joel T. Lazarus, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No. 2016-CA007110.

Lee H. Schillinger of Law Offices of Lee H. Schillinger, P.A., Weston, for 

appellants.

Michael K. Winston and Dean A. Morande of Carlton Fields Jorden 

Burt, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### §§ 95.789-95.899 [Reserved]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Millennium Challenge Corporation

          - [MCC FR 06-14] 

# AGENCY:

Millennium Challenge Corporation. 

# TIME AND DATE:

4:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m., Tuesday, September 12, 2006. 

# PLACE:

Department of State, 2201 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20520. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Information on the meeting may be obtained from Suzi M. Morris via e-mail at                         *Board@mcc.gov*                         or by telephone at (202) 521-3600.                     

# STATUS:

Meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

The Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the Millennium Challenge Corporation (“MCC”) will hold a meeting to initiate the FY 2007 country selection process by identifying countries that will be candidates for Millennium Challenge Account (“MCA”) assistance in FY 2007 based on the per capita income and other requirements of Section 606(a) of the Millennium Challenge Act of 2003 (Pub. L. 108-199 (Division D)) (the “Act”) and to discuss other Compact development efforts with MCA-eligible countries, the MCC Threshold Program, and certain administrative matters, all which are expected to involve the consideration of classified information and will be closed to the public. 

Dated: August 30, 2006. 

William G. Anderson, Jr., 

Vice President and General Counsel (Acting),  Millennium Challenge Corporation. 

[FR Doc. 06-7426 Filed 8-30-06; 2:30 pm] 

BILLING CODE 9210-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of China Water Group, Inc. (the “Registrant”) certifies that:




1.           The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and




2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Date:  December 14, 2011
/s/ Wenge FangWenge Fang, Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned is the Chief Financial Officer of China Water Group, Inc.  This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.  This Certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of China Water Group, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2013.

The undersigned certifies that such 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of China Water Group, Inc. as of March 31, 2013.

This Certification is executed as of September 29, 2015.

/s/ Ding Rencai

     Ding Rencai

     Chief Financial Officer
#### Leslie R. Pratt, Appellant, *v.*The Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Respondent.

(Two actions.)

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

February, 1910.)

Marine Courts — Procedure—Pleading — Complaint — Sufficiency — Necessity of alleging residence to sustain jurisdiction.

A plaintiff’s residence in this State, although necessary to confer jurisdiction upon the Municipal Court of the city of New York to entertain an action, need not be alleged in the complaint.

*184Appeals by the .plaintiff from two orders of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, seventh district, borough of Manhattan, sustaining defendant’s demurrers to the amended complaints herein.

Allen & Culver, for appellant.

Robinson, Biddle & Benedict (Herman B. Beecher, George R. Allen and W. W. Cunningham, of counsel), for respondent. •

*Per Gwriam.*

Defendant demurred because it did not affirmatively appear upon the face of the complaint that plaintiff is a resident of the State. If not, the court has not jurisdiction. Code Civ. Pro., § 1780.

The jurisdiction of the Municipal Court does -not have to appear in the pleadings affirmatively any more than that of the Supreme Court. Meuthen v. Eyelis, 3-3 Mise. Rep. 98. The question of the plaintiff’s residence, therefore, does not have to appear in this instance. Herbert v. Montana Diamond Co., 81 App. Div. 212. So far as the *obiter dicto,*in O’Reilly v. New Brunswick A. & N. Y. Steamboat Co., 28 Misc. Rep. 112, conflict, they have been overruled by the case last cited.

The demurrers should, therefore, have been overruled; but judgment has not been entered thereon, and the appeals have been prematurely taken. Watson v. Duryea, 133 App. Div. 233.

The appeals should, therefore, be dismissed, with ten dollars costs.

Present: Seabury, Guy & Whitney, JJ.

Appeals dismissed, with ten dollars costs.
§ 95.1959 Antennas. ( a ) The overall height from ground to topmost tip of the CTS antenna shall not exceed the height necessary to assure adequate service. Certain CTS antennas must be individually licensed to the 218-219 MHz System licensee (*see* § 95.1911(b) of this part). CTS antennas must also meet the requirements in § 95.317 regarding menaces to air navigation. *See* 47 CFR 95.317 and consult part 17 of the FCC's Rules for more information (47 CFR part 17).
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) The RTU may be connected to an external antenna not more than 6.1 m (20 feet) above ground or above an existing man-made structure (other than an antenna structure). Connectors that are used to connect RTUs to an external antenna shall not be of the types generally known as “F-type” or “BNC type.” Use of an external antenna is subject to § 95.1961.
§ 14.54 Unavailability of Service officers. ( a ) *Designated ports.* All wildlife arriving at a designated port must be cleared by a Service officer prior to Customs clearance and release. When importers or their agents expect live or perishable shipments of wildlife or wildlife products or request inspection at the time of arrival, they must notify the Service at least 48 hours prior to the estimated time of arrival. However, where a Service officer is not available within a reasonable time, Customs Officers may clear live or perishable wildlife subject to post-clearance inspection and investigation by the Service.
( b ) *Border and special ports.* Wildlife lawfully imported at Canadian or Mexican border ports under § 14.16, or into Alaska, Puerto Rico, or the Virgin Islands, under § 14.19, may, if a Service officer is not available within a reasonable time, be cleared by Customs officers, subject to post-clearance inspection and investigation by the Service.
( c ) *Permit imports.* Wildlife imported at a nondesignated port in accordance with the terms of a valid permit issued under subpart C of this part, may, if a Service officer is not available within a reasonable time, be cleared by Customs officers, subject to post-clearance inspection and investigation by the Service.
( d ) *Personal baggage and household effects.* Wildlife lawfully imported at any port of entry under § 14.15, may, if a Service officer is not available within a reasonable time, be cleared by Customs officers, subject to post-clearance inspection and investigation by the Service.
( e ) *Personally owned pet birds.* Personally owned pet birds lawfully imported at a port of entry under § 14.17, may, if a Service officer is not available within a reasonable time, be cleared by Customs officers, subject to post-clearance inspection and investigation by the Service.
( f ) *Exports.* Exporters or their agents must notify the Service and make the shipment available for inspection at least 48 hours prior to the estimated time of exportation of any wildlife.
[45 FR 56673, Aug. 25, 1980, as amended at 61 FR 31869, June 21, 1996]
#### §§ 95.2781-95.2899 [Reserved]
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 170 (Friday, September 1, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 52012]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7397]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

43 CFR Part 4100

[WO-220-1020-24 1A]
RIN 1004-AD42


Grazing Administration--Exclusive of Alaska

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects editorial and typographical errors in a 
final rule published in the Federal Register on July 12, 2006, 
regarding the administration of livestock grazing on public lands 
managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM).

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 11, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ted Hudson, 202-452-5042. Individuals 
who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may contact him 
through the Federal Information Relay Service at 1-800/877-8339, 24 
hours a day, seven days a week.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The final rule that is the subject of these corrections amended the 
regulations on grazing administration, exclusive of Alaska, in 43 CFR 
part 4100.

Need for Correction

    As published, the final rule contained editorial, typographical, 
and printing errors in the preamble, involving cross-references and CFR 
citations, which may prove to be misleading and need to be corrected.
    In rule FR Doc. 06-5788 published on July 12, 2006 (71 FR 39402), 
make the following corrections.
    1. On page 39437, in the third column, correct the second full 
paragraph by removing the citation ``1610.0-5(b)'' in the eighth (8th) 
line, and adding in its place the citation ``1601.0-5(b),'' and by 
removing the citation ``1610.0-5(c)'' in the 14th line, and adding in 
its place the citation ``1601.0-5(c).''
    2. On page 39446, in the first column, correct the second full 
paragraph by removing the citation ``1600.0-5'' from the third-to-last 
line, and adding in its place the citation ``1601.0-5(i)''.
    3. On page 39488, in the third column, correct the heading between 
the third and fourth paragraphs by removing the citation ``4160.37'' 
and adding in its place the citation ``4160.3.''

    Dated: August 28, 2006.
Johnnie Burton,
Acting Assistant Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 06-7397 Filed 8-31-06 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-84-P
#### § 216.86 Local regulations.

Local regulations will be published from time to time and will be brought to the attention of local residents and persons assigned to duty on the Islands by posting in public places and brought to the attention of tourists by personal notice.

[41 FR 49488, Nov. 9, 1976. Redesignated at 61 FR 11750, Mar. 22, 1996]
# Women's Equality Day, 2006

The ratification of our Constitution's 19th Amendment on August 26, 1920, marked a turning point for America as women were guaranteed the right to vote. On Women's Equality Day, we celebrate this milestone and pay tribute to the inspiring individuals who stepped forward and asked our Nation to live up to its founding principle of equality for all. 

The struggle for women's rights is a story of strong women joining together to break down the barriers to equality. With courage and determination, Lucretia Mott, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Susan B. Anthony, and other suffragists inspired generations of women and helped change the path of our Nation's history. The Seneca Falls Convention of 1848 sparked a mass movement for women's voting rights that gained support from women of all ages and backgrounds. In 1890, Wyoming became the first State whose constitution allowed women to vote, and by 1918, women could vote in 14 additional States. Two years later, women secured nationwide suffrage with the passage of the 19th Amendment. By demanding participation in the democratic process, these visionaries helped spread freedom, justice, and hope for generations to come. 

Women today are continuing the suffragists' legacy of leadership and strength. They are shaping the future through their contributions to all aspects of American life, including science, law, business, education, athletics, and the arts. They are serving our Nation with honor and distinction in our Armed Forces. American women have served as examples for women in other countries in their efforts to increase their participation in civic and political life. Our Nation remains committed to advancing the equality of women in the world's newest democracies and fighting threats to women around the globe. 

The courage of American suffragists made our Nation a stronger and more hopeful place, and we will continue to build an America where the dignity of every person is respected and where opportunity is within reach of all our citizens. On Women's Equality Day, we honor the contributions and accomplishments of women throughout our history, and we pay tribute to all those who helped bring equality to women in America. 

                        NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim August 26, 2006, as Women's Equality Day. I call upon the people of the United States to celebrate the achievements of women and observe this day with appropriate programs and activities.                               ( print page 50318)    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-first day of August, in the year of our Lord two thousand six, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first. 

[FR Doc. 06-7179

Billing code 3195-01-P
§ 80.1135 Transmission of maritime safety information. ( a ) The operational details of the stations transmitting maritime safety information in accordance with this section are indicated in the ITU List of Radiodetermination and Special Service Stations and the IMO Master Plan of Shore-Based Facilities.
( b ) The mode and format of the transmissions mentioned in this section is in accordance with ITU-R M.540-2 (incorporated by reference, *see* § 80.7) as specified in § 80.1101.
( c ) Maritime safety information is transmitted by means of narrow-band direct-printing telegraphy with forward error correction using the frequency 518 kHz in accordance with the international NAVTEX system (see § 80.1077).
( d ) The frequency 490 kHz may be used, after full implementation of the GMDSS, for the transmission of maritime safety information by means of narrow-band direct-printing telegraphy with forward error correction (see § 80.1077).
( e ) Internationally, the frequency 4209.5 kHz is used for NAVTEX-type transmissions by means of narrow-band direct-printing telegraphy with forward error correction (see § 80.1077).
( f ) Maritime safety information is transmitted by means of narrow-band direct-printing telegraphy with forward error correction using the frequencies 4210 kHz, 6314 kHz, 8416.5 kHz, 12579 kHz, 16806.5 kHz, 19680.5, 22376 kHz, and 26100.5 kHz (see § 80.1077).
( g ) Maritime safety information is transmitted via satellite in the maritime mobile-satellite service using the band 1530-1545 MHz (see § 80.1077).
[57 FR 9065, Mar. 16, 1992, as amended at 68 FR 46982, Aug. 7, 2003; 76 FR 67618, Nov. 2, 2011]
#### State of Nebraska, ex rel. Frank Shaffer, v. Henry E. Bowman et al.

Filed September 17, 1895.

No. 4160.

Mandamus. A writ of *mandamus*will issue only when the right to require the performance of the desired act is clear.

Original application for *mandamus.*

*Writ denied.*

*William Leese*and *F. B. Beall,*for relator.

*C. C. Flansburg*and *J. G. Thompson, contra.*

Ryan, C.

This application for a *mandamus*was filed April 8,1890. The relator in his petition alleged that the city of Alma in the year 1890 was a city of the second class, containing more than one thousand inhabitants; that said city was made up of three wards; that on the-first Tuesday of April, 1890, the relator was a candidate for the office of councilman of the first ward and received the same number of votes as did the candidate opposing him; and that the respondents, who were judges of the election in the said ward, had duly delivered to the city clerk of Alma the ballots cast and poll books used in said first ward election without having previously determined by ballot which candidate should serve as councilman from the first ward. The prayer was for a writ of *mandamus*requiring the respondents to assemble forthwith and determine the aforesaid tie vote by ballot and certify the result to the city clerk and council of said city. By their answer filed October 2,1891, the respondents alleged that they had never been requested to determine the said tie vote until the poll books and ballots had passed out of the hands of themselves as election judges. We have been cited to no statute which in terms *753makes provision for the above' contingency. Section 45, ohapter 26, Compiled Statutes, provides that where the tie is between two persons, who are candidates for a township ■office the clerk shall notify both to appear at his office at a given time to determine the same by lot before the board and that the certificate of election shall be given accordingly. If the above proceedings prescribed by the chapter entitled “Elections” are by analogy to be deemed applicable to elections in cities of the class to which Alma belongs, as probably they should be, the petition should have stated that the city clerk had taken the step above indicated before a decision could be required by lot, and, even then, the general powers of the judges of election would not so nearly correspond to those of the board as would the powers of the city council. The writ is denied.

Writ denied.