alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH CIR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 4, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41128 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. MICHAEL RAY HARRISON Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:05-CR-70-ALL
Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Michael Ray Harrison appeals hisconviction and sentence for being a felon in possession ofa firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He asserts that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress because his drug use before his interrogation rendered his waiver of rights involuntary. He has not established that the district court clearly erred in determining that his waiver
was knowing and intelligent. U nited States v. Reynolds 367 F.3d 294, 298-99 (5th Cir. 2004); United States v. Andrews, 22 F.3d 1328, 1340 (5th Cir. 1994).No. 06-41128

2 Harrison contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction because there was no evidence corroborating his confession. There was “‘substantial independent evidence that the offense has been committed,’” which was sufficient toestablish his guilt. U nited Statesv. Ybarra, 70 F.3d 362, 365 (5th Cir. 1995)(quoting United Statesv. Garth, 773 F.2d 1469, 1479 (5th Cir. 1985)). Harrison also challenges his 327-month sentence. He asserts that the district court wrongly found enhancements under the Sentencing Guidelines that were not admitted by him or found by a jury, which violates the Constitution. By rendering the Guidelines advisory only, U nited States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), eliminated Sixth Amendment concerns prohibiting a sentencing judge from finding all facts relevant to sentencing. United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 519 (5th Cir. 2005). Additionally, any challenge to the sentencing enhancements under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1 would have no effect on his sentence, as the probation officer reached the same offense level under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.4 by finding that Harrison was a career offender, and Harrison does not challenge this ruling on appeal. Harrison has failed to overcome the presumption of reasonableness in his i mposed sentence, which was within a properly-calculated guideline range. See Rita v. United States, 127 S. Ct. 2456, 2462-68 (2007). Consequently, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### § 16.1 Purpose of regulations.

The regulations contained in this part implement the Lacey Act (18 U.S.C. 42).
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5081

To provide for a demonstration project by Federal Prison Industries.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 22, 1994

Mr. HUGHES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To provide for a demonstration project by Federal Prison

Industries.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SEC. . PRISON INDUSTRIES DEMONSTRATION PROJECT.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 1761 of

5 title 18, United States Code—

6 (1) Federal Prison Industries shall, not later

7 than December 1, 1995, establish a demonstration

8 project in which prisoners are paid wages at rates,

9 not less than the Federal minimum wage applicable

10 for similar work done by free labor, to engage in the

11 production of goods, of a type currently made pri-
2

•HR 5081 IH

1 marily in foreign countries, which may be sold do2 mestically to the general public at market prices;

3 and

4 (2) the Director of the Bureau of Prisons may

5 deduct from any wages paid to a prisoner that is

6 equal to or in excess of the legal minimum wage

7 paid to free laborers engaged in the same sort of

8 work at the place where the prisoner’s work is done

9 an amount, not to exceed 80 percent of the wages,

10 the Director determines will defray the costs to the

11 United States associated with the imprisonment of

12 that prisoner.

13 (b) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than two

14 years after the demonstration project under subsection (a)

15 is begun, Federal Prison Industries and the Director of

16 the Bureau of Prisons shall jointly report to Congress on

17 the demonstration project, including a description of its

18 economic viability, and make recommendations as to

19 whether such project should be continued or expanded.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5154 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5154

To amend the Agricultural Act of 1949 to temporarily suspend operation 
 of the precondition on the provision of extended price support loans 
            for corn under the farmer owned reserve program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 30, 1994

  Mr. Minge introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Agricultural Act of 1949 to temporarily suspend operation 
 of the precondition on the provision of extended price support loans 
            for corn under the farmer owned reserve program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AVAILABILITY OF EXTENDED PRICE SUPPORT LOANS FOR THE 1994 
              CORN CROP UNDER THE FARMER OWNED RESERVE PROGRAM.

    (a) Availability.--Subsection (b)(1) of section 110 of the 
Agricultural Act of 1949 (7 U.S.C. 1445e) is amended by adding at the 
end the following new sentence: ``Notwithstanding the preceding 
sentence, the Secretary shall permit producers of corn to be marketed 
during the marketing year beginning on September 1, 1994, and ending on 
August 31, 1995, to select an extended loan under this section as an 
alternative to an original loan for the crop under section 105B.''.
    (b) Storage Payments.--Subsection (d)(2) of such section is amended 
by adding at the end the following new sentence: ``In the case of 
producers referred to in the third sentence of subsection (b)(1), 
storage payments shall be made at the time the crop is placed in 
storage to cover the anticipated storage period.''.
                                 <all>
```
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0681Virginia Beach Police Department: Enhancing Cultures of Integrity Technical Assistance GuideThe Virginia Beach Police Department Enhancing Cultures of Integrity Technical Assistance Guide is the third in a series of reports detailing projects resulting from the COPS Office Creating a Culture of Integrity grant program. These grants funded initiatives related to developing innovative ethics and integrity programs to address policies and practices that can impact organizational culture within law enforcement agencies. In this guide, the Virginia Beach Police Department details their steps to enhance police integrity by focusing on leadership development, coaching and mentoring, and an improved citizen complaint system and complaint mediation program.Categories: Ethics and IntegrityLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0681Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Dec 2012Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 02:13 (UTC-5) in 0.20 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
```

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 153 (Wednesday, August 9, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 45579]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6772]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

Acadia National Park Advisory Commission; Notice of Meeting

    Notice if hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770, 5 U.S.C. App. 1, Sec. 10), 
that the Acadia National Park Advisory Commission will hold a meeting 
on Monday, September 11, 2006.
    The Commission was established pursuant to Public Law 99-420, Sec. 
103. The purpose of the commission is to consult with the Secretary of 
the Interior, or his designee, on matters relating to the management 
and development of the park, including but not limited to the 
acquisition of lands and interests in lands (including conservation 
easements on islands) and termination of rights of use and occupancy.
    The meeting will convene at Park Headquarters, Bar Harbor, Maine, 
at 1 p.m. to consider the following agenda:
    1. Review and approval of minutes from the meeting held June 5, 
2006.
    2. Committee reports:

--Land Conservation
--Park Use
--Science and Education
--Historic

    3. Old business.
    4. Superintendent's report.
    5. Public comments.
    6. Proposed agenda for next Commission meeting, February 5, 2007.
    The meeting is open to the public. Interested persons may make 
oral/written presentations to the Commission or file written 
statements. Such requests should be made to the Superintendent at least 
seven days prior to the meeting.
    Further information concerning this meeting may be obtained from 
the Superintendent, Acadia National Park, P.O. Box 177, Bar Harbor, 
Maine 04609, tel: (207) 288-3338.

    Dated: July 19, 2006.
Sheridan Steele,
Superintendent.
[FR Doc. 06-6772 Filed 8-8-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-2N-M
```
§ 87.185 Scope of service. ( a ) Aircraft stations must limit their communications to the necessities of safe, efficient, and economic operation of aircraft and the protection of life and property in the air, except as otherwise specifically provided in this part. Contact with an aeronautical land station must only be attempted when the aircraft is within the serivce area of the land station. however, aircraft stations may transmit advisory information on air traffic control, unicom or aeronautical multicom frequencies for the benefit and use of other stations monitoring these frequencies in accordance with FAA recommended traffic advisory practices.
( b ) Aircraft public correspondence service must be made available to all persons without discrimination and on reasonable demand, and must communicate without discrimination with any public coast station or mobile-satellite earth station authorized to provide aircraft public correspondence service.
( c ) Aircraft public correspondence service on maritime mobile frequencies may only be carried by aircraft stations licensed to use maritime mobile frequencies and must follow the rules for public correspondence in part 80.
( d ) Aircraft public correspondence service on Aeronautical Mobile-Satellite (R) Service frequencies may only be carried on aircraft earth stations licensed to use Aeronautical Mobile-Satellite (R) frequencies and are subject to the rules for public correspondence in this part. Aircraft public correspondence service on Maritime Mobile-Satellite Service frequencies may only be carried by aircraft earth stations licensed to use Maritime Mobile-Satellite frequencies and are subject to the rules for public correspondence in part 80.
[53 FR 28940, Aug. 1, 1988, as amended at 57 FR 45750, Oct. 5, 1992]
#### § 18.75 Notification by interested persons.

Any person desiring to participate as a party shall notify the Director, by certified mail, on or before the date specified in the notice of hearing.
Case 16-23805 Doc 1 Filed 07/25/16 Entered 07/25/16 16:03:15 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 9
Case 16-23805 Doc 1 Filed 07/25/16 Entered 07/25/16 16:03:15 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 9
Case 16-23805 Doc 1 Filed 07/25/16 Entered 07/25/16 16:03:15 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 9
Case 16-23805 Doc 1 Filed 07/25/16 Entered 07/25/16 16:03:15 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 9
Case 16-23805 Doc 1 Filed 07/25/16 Entered 07/25/16 16:03:15 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 9
Case 16-23805 Doc 1 Filed 07/25/16 Entered 07/25/16 16:03:15 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 9
Case 16-23805 Doc 1 Filed 07/25/16 Entered 07/25/16 16:03:15 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 9
Case 16-23805 Doc 1 Filed 07/25/16 Entered 07/25/16 16:03:15 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 9
Case 16-23805 Doc 1 Filed 07/25/16 Entered 07/25/16 16:03:15 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 9
§ 16.15 Importation of live reptiles or their eggs. ( a ) The importation, transportation, or acquisition of any live specimen, gamete, viable egg, or hybrid of the species listed in this paragraph is prohibited except as provided under the terms and conditions set forth at § 16.22: ( 1 ) *Boiga irregulari* s (brown tree snake).
( 2 ) *Python molurus* (including *P. molurus molurus* (Indian python) and *P. molurus bivittatus* (Burmese python)).
( 3 ) Python reticulatus, Broghammerus reticulatus, or Malayopython reticulatus (reticulated python).
( 4 ) *Python sebae* (Northern African python or African rock python).
( 5 ) *Python natalensis* (Southern African python or African rock python).
( 6 ) *Eunectes notaeus* (yellow anaconda).
( 7 ) *Eunectes deschauenseei* (DeSchauensee's anaconda).
( 8 ) *Eunectes murinus* (green anaconda).
( 9 ) *Eunectes beniensis* (Beni anaconda).
( b ) Upon the filing of a written declaration with the District Director of Customs at the port of entry as required under § 14.61, all other species of live reptiles or their eggs may be imported, transported, and possessed in captivity, without a permit, for scientific, medical, educational, exhibitional or propagating purposes, but no such live reptiles or any progency or eggs thereof may be released into the wild except by the State wildlife conservation agency having jurisdiction over the area of release or by persons having prior written permission for release from such agency.
[55 FR 17441, Apr. 25, 1990, as amended at 77 FR 3366, Jan. 23, 2012; 80 FR 12745, Mar. 10, 2015]
#### §§ 95.727-95.729 [Reserved]
IB

House Calendar No. 231

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4967

[Report No. 103–762]

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse in Detroit,

Michigan, as the ‘‘Theodore Levin Federal Building and United States

Courthouse’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 16, 1994

Miss COLLINS of Michigan introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Public Works and Transportation

SEPTEMBER 29, 1994

Additional sponsors: Mr. DINGELL, Mr. FORD of Michigan, Mr. CONYERS, Mr.

BARCIA of Michigan, Mr. EHLERS, Mr. CAMP, Mr. UPTON, Mr. SMITH

of Michigan, Mr. CARR of Michigan, Mr. KILDEE, Mr. KNOLLENBERG,

Mr. STUPAK, Mr. HOEKSTRA, and Mr. BONIOR

SEPTEMBER 29, 1994

Reported with amendments, referred to the House Calendar, and ordered to

be printed

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic]

A BILL

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse in Detroit, Michigan, as the ‘‘Theodore Levin Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.
2

•HR 4967 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Federal building and United States courthouse

5 located at 231 W. Lafayette in Detroit, Michigan, shall

6 be known and designated as the ‘‘Theodore Levin Federal

7 Building and United States Courthouse’’.

8 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

9 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

10 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

11 building and United States courthouse referred to in sec12 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Theodore

13 Levin Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.

14 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

15 The United States courthouse located at 231 West La16 fayette Street in Detroit, Michigan, shall be known and des17 ignated as the ‘‘Theodore Levin United States Courthouse’’.

18 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

19 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

20 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

21 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

22 to be a reference to the ‘‘Theodore Levin United States

23 Courthouse’’.

Amend the title so as to read as follows: ‘‘A bill to

designate the United States courthouse located at 231
3

•HR 4967 RH

West Lafayette Street in Detroit, Michigan, as the ‘Theodore Levin United States Courthouse’.’’.

House Calendar No. 231

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4967

[Report No. 103–762]

A BILL

To designate the Federal building and United

States Courthouse’’.‘‘Theodore Levin Federal Building and UnitedStates courthouse in Detroit, Michigan, as the

SEPTEMBER 29, 1994

Reported with amendments, referred to the House

Calendar, and ordered to be printed
#### §§ 95.2743-95.2747 [Reserved]
### F w : pe rm i t t

o i n c r ea s e a i r po ll u t

i on b y S i e rr

a P a c i f ic

R9 A i rP e rm i t

s t o: s ha l e v

. o m er 10 / 18 / 2012 03 : 56 PM

S en t b y: O m e r S ha l ev

----- F o r w a r ded b y O m e r S ha l e v /

R 9 / U SEPA / U S on 10

/ 18 / 2012 03 : 56 P M

-----

F r o m : J o no r

ene < j ono r ene @y ahoo

. c o m>

T o : R 9

A i rP e r mi t

s@ EPA

D a t e : 10

/ 16 / 2012 03 : 50 PM

S ub j e c t: pe r mi t t

o i n c r ea s e a i r po ll u t

i on b y S i e rr

a P a c i f ic

Dea r O m e r S ha l e v,

I w i s h t o e x p r e ss m y oppo s i t i on t o t he pe r m i t be f o r e y ou t o bu il d a 31 m ega w a tt w ood bu r n i ng po w e r

p l an t no r t h o f A nde r s on.

A s y ou k no w

t h i s w ill be be i n add i t i on t o t he 6 w ood bu r n i ng po w e r p l an t s i n S ha s t a Coun ty

.

T he p l an t w ill e m i t abou t 330

, 000 t on s o f g r eenhou s e ga s e s annua ll y.

A ll 6 p l an t s w ou l d t hen be gene r a t i ng abou t 2

. 16 m illi on t on s o f g r eenhou s e ga s e s annua ll y.

T he S t a t e s a y s S ha s t a Coun t y a l r ead y r e c e i v e s 26

. 5 TO N o f c a r bon m ono x i de r e l ea s ed i n t o t he a i r

D A I L Y.

It i s un r ea s onab l e t o a ll o w t h i s p l an t t o i n cr ea s e ou r a i r po ll u t i on

T he EPA s ou l d den y t he pe r m i t.

S i n c e r e l y,

J oan Co l e m an

Redd i ng Ca
**Exhibit
        32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**
 **THE
        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b)**
 **OF
        SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)**
  Pursuant
        to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b)
        of
        Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Gregory L.
        Cauthen, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Transocean
        Inc., a
        Cayman Islands company (the “Company”), hereby certify, to my knowledge,
        that:
 
 (1)
              the
                  Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
                  2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 (2)
              Information
                  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
                  the
                  financial condition and results of operations of the
                  Company.
 
 Dated:
              August
                  2, 2005
              
              /s/
                  Gregory L. CauthenName:
              Gregory
                  L. CauthenSenior
                  Vice President and Chief Financial
                  Officer
 
 The
        foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906
        of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
        63
        of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report
        or
        as a separate disclosure document.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        Transocean Inc. and will be retained by Transocean Inc. and furnished to
        the
        Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EPA Meeting with HCNA LLC June 21 , 2012 **Attendees:** EPA OUST: Liz McDermott, Linda Gerber , Paul Miller, Tim Roberts, Erin Knighton , Tim Smith HCNA LLC : Karl Overman Alan Anderson and Associates: Alan Anderson At this meeting EPA and HCNA discussed the proposed changes to the UST regulations . The discussion focused on airport hydrant sy stems and the capabilities of release detection on these ty pes of sy stems.