## SERVED DECEMBE R30 , 201 1 U.S . DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O F HEARING S WASHINGTON , D C '•'-'•--^^Ort>^f^riQr.i^ : ^Oi i DF C J O P ,7 : 1^

2 I N TH E MATTE ROF : ) ) DOCKE T NO . FAA-2011-111 7 FLEET AVIATION , LLC , ) ) CaseNo . 2010EA11002 1 Respondent

) ) ORDE RSETTIN G RUL E 1 6 LITIGATIO N SCHEDULIN G CONFERENCE , AND

DIRECTIN G RUL E 26(f ) PLANNIN G AND SUBMISSIO N ! ) Rul e 1 6 Litigatio n Schedulin g Conference : Pursuan t to . 1 4 C.F.R . § 13.205(a)(1 ) and(7 ) an dCiv.R . 16 , th e partie s shal l appea r b y tele

phon e o n Wednesday , Februar y 29 , 201 2 a t 2:30D mEaster n tim e fo r aRul e 1 6 Litigatio n Schedulin g Conference . Durin g thi s Conferenc e th e partie s will discus s th e issue s i n th e dispute , thei r jointl y submitte dpropose dscheduling/discovery pla n (se e paragrap h 2 infra ) andrespon d to an y question s regardin g disagreement s not resolve di

n th e propose dplan . Durin g th e Confe

renc e afinal scheduling/discovery pla n will b e rule dupon , a s wel l a s any othe r relate dmatter s pursuant to Rul e 16(c) . Th e Offic e o f Hearing s will initiat e th e Conferenc e b y telephon e call , contactin g eac h part

y a t th e party' s telephon e number o f record . A part

y ma y provid e a

n alter

nate number

b y notifyin g th e Offic e o f

Hearing s a

t leas t 24 hour s prio r

to th e Conference . 2 ) Rul e 26ff

) Attorneys ' Plannin g Meeting , andSubmissio n o f Propose dDiscover

y Plan : Pursuan t t o 1 4 C.F.R . §13.21 7 an dCiv.R . 26(f) , prio r to convenin g wit

h th e Judg e fo

r th e Rul e 1 6 Litigatio n Schedulin g Conference , th e partie s shal l privatel y conduc t aRul e 26(f

j plan

nin g meetin g andprepar e ajointl y writte n propose dscheduling/discovery , plan , whic h mus t b e complete dandfiledwit

h th e undersigne dJudg e o n or befor e Wednesday , Februar y 22 , 201 2 (i.e. , seve n (7 ) calenda

r day s before th e Conference) . I n additio n t o filin g th e propose dschedul

ing/discovei y pla

n b y regular mai l filing wit

h th e U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportation' s Docket Office , th e partie s shal l file aworkin g cop y o f th e scheduling/discovery plan wit h th e under

Pas e I o f 2signe dJudg e a t th e Offic e o f

Hearing s b

y fax , expres s earner , o r

personal delivery . Th e certifi

cat e o f servic e shoul dreflec t

th e mamier

o f service . Th e Attorneys ' Rul e 26( 0 plamiin g meetin g shal l includ e agoo dfait h discussio n abou t

th e nature an dbasi s o f eac h party' s claims , th e possibility o f resolvin g all o r

par t o f th e case , th e scop e an dtyp e o f discovery (includin g electroni c discovery ) an dth e plac e o f

venu e fo r hearing . Durin g thi s meeting , th e partie s shal l discus s matter s identifie di n 1 4 C.F.R . §13.21 7 andRul e 26(l)(2 ) an

d(3 ) a s par

t o f developin g thei r

propose dscheduling/discovery plan . Th e parties ' plannin g meetin g shoul dals o includ e discussio n about th e sequenc e an

dtimin g o f

follow-up dis

covery , includin g whethe r tha t discovery shoul db e conducte di n phase s to prepar e fo

r an y filing o f particula r motion s (e.g. . limitin g scop e o f trial , dispositiv e motions , etc) . Th e deadline s i n th e parties ' propose dscheduling/discovery pla n shoul dbe mutuall y agreeable , wit h avie w t o achievin g cas e resolutio n wit h aminimu mo f

expens e an

ddelay . An

y unresolve dschedul

ing/discover

y dispute s shoul db e clearl y identifie di n th e propose dplan , s o tha t thes e dispute s ma y b e addresse db

y th e Judg e durin g th e Rul e 1 6 Litigatio n Schedulin g Conference . 3 ) Conflict s wit

h Rul e 1 6 Liti^atio n Schedulin g Conferenc e Date : I f apart y ha s a n unavoidabl e conflic t

wit h th e schedule dRul e 1 6 Litigatio n Schedulin g Conferenc e se

t i n paragrap h 1 supra , andwishe s to modif y th e date/tim e o f

th e schedule dConfe

rence , th e part

y shal l first

confer wit h opposin g counse l abou t mutuall y agreeabl e alternat e dates , an dthe n contac t

C . Dian e May s a

t th e Offic e o f

Hearing s (202-366-2132 ) a s soo n a s possibl e af

ter receip t o f thi s Order , wit

h a t leas t thre e (3 ) mutually-agreed , propose dalternat e dates/time s fo r the Judge' s consideration .

rva n rativ e La w Judg e Attachment : Servic e Lis t

Pao e 2 o f 2FDM S NO . FAA-201 M 11 7 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L & ON E COP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC^3 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON E COP Y Gregor y S . Winton , Respondent' s Counse l Th e Aviatio n La w Fir m On e Researc h Court , Suit e 45 0 RockvillcM D 2085 0 TEL : 301-294-855 0 FAX : 301-294-252 5 Zacher y M . Berman , Complainant' s Counse l Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counsel , AEA- 7 Easter n Regio n Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 1 Aviatio n Plaz a Jamaica , N Y 1143 4 TEL : 718-553-325 8 FAX : 718-995-569 9 Th e Honorabl e J.E . Sullivan , Admimslrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , IvI-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL ; 202-366-213 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service wa

s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i n perso n o r b y expedite dcourier , use th

e followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio n Administration , 600 Independence Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2WI000 , Washington , D C 20591 ; Anention : Hearini i Docke t Clerk, AGC^30 .