alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

This Notice is published in accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463). The topic of the meeting on September 12-14, 2006 are to review new start and continuing research and development projects requesting Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program funds in excess of $1M. This meeting is open to the public. Any interested person may attend, appear before, or file statements with the Scientific Advisory Board at the time and in the manner permitted by the Board.

# DATES:

September 12, 2006 from 10:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.; September 13 from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.; and September 14, 2006 from 8:30 a.m. to 2 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

SERDP Program Office Conference Center, 901 North Stuart Street, Suite 804, Arlington, VA 22203.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Misa Jensen, SERDP Program Office, 901 North Stuart Street, Suite 303, Arlington, VA or by telephone at (703) 696-2126.

Dated: August 15, 2006.

C.R. Choate,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 06-7038 Filed 8-18-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

Honorable George 

County irttorneg 

goart Band County 

Riohmond, Texas 

Dear Sir: 

G. Roan4 

AUSTIN 

/ 

lowrr I Oourt 

"Does the Cosmlesi 

Uountr hew euthority 

the use of coTmisafon4rs 

oial buaioass?N 

omobilee for 

oi tkm opinion that the Cornting under the Oensral Road 

ut in Title 44, Vol. I, of 

mpowered or authorized to buy 

r the aounty ta be used by 

rmanw of their dutti38 ~8 COUntp 

oper%te uk:er agaoial 

for a mor4 detailed 

zzminteaance of road4 in Such count,ies. In ati lnetanaes these 

speoial road lewe provide for the purchrtwe czd >eyment of 

various k',nds of aqui;.ment, fneLudirE: pick-ups, ato. 1% ia 

our understnodlng t&t your county operate6 under the GaUiPr~l 

maw, and th.e General Law umkes no ;~ovisioq for the paynwmt of 

aacounte or erpnses incurred b,y aoannisslonera arhiie ual~g 

their own private outomobl~les in oonneation wit.3 their budiwes 
Ron. Gee. C. Rome, Zsge P 

l;~ OOWI~~ COL+DX&Z~O~QX, nor does it *&Q any prwlhon~.~iOCr 

the ~urohase of autombil~s or pick-ups for the county, to 

SC ~33~5 by the ccsmty coxnlssioners in the conduct of their 

office. 

48 you state tbit you hme a oopy of our OpMon 

1J0. O-752, we ~332 siot senbiw you a copy of Ban@. 

Tm.sti!q that this 8atisfaOtOrily rm~rB y0Ur 

inquiry, we %?a3
Exhibit 10.35
                                  -------------

                             Escalade, Incorporated
                        Schedule of Director Compensation

         Each director of Escalade, Incorporated currently receives an annual
cash retainer of $7,000, with the exception of the Chairman of the Board who
receives an annual cash retainer of $25,000. The Chairman of the Audit Committee
receives an additional fee of $2,000 and the Chairman of the Compensation
Committee receives an additional fee of $2,000, in consideration of the extra
services required by each of them, respectively, as the chairman of such
committees. In addition, all directors receive $4,000 for each meeting attended
and are reimbursed for their expenses in attending the meetings. Directors who
are employees of the Company receive the same retainer and fees as directors who
are not employees.

         In accordance with the Company's 1997 Director Stock Compensation and
Option Plan which was approved by the Company's shareholders, directors may
elect to defer their director compensation and receive shares of the Company's
common stock instead. Each director who elects to receive shares also is granted
stock options in an amount equal to one half of the shares issued. The exercise
price of those options is based on the closing share price on the first business
day following the Company's annual meeting of shareholders.

                                       59
#### § 95.2725 MURS interference.

MURS station operators must take reasonable precautions to avoid causing harmful interference. This includes monitoring the transmitting frequency for communications in progress before transmitting, and other measures as may be necessary to minimize the potential for causing interference.
<page>					  EXHIBIT 32.02




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Dean Witter Portfolio
Strategy Fund L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Kevin
Perry, Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation,
the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.






By:	  /s/	Kevin Perry

Name:		Kevin Perry
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		March 31, 2006
House Calendar No. 238

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4948

[Report No. 103–823]

A BILL

To designate Building Number 137 of the TuscaAlabama, as the ‘‘Claude Harris, Jr. Building’’. loosa Veterans’ Medical Center in Tuscaloosa,

OCTOBER 3, 1994

Reported and referred to the House Calendar, and

ordered to be printed
IB

House Calendar No. 238

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4948

[Report No. 103–823]

To designate Building Number 137 of the Tuscaloosa Veterans’ Medical

Center in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, as the ‘‘Claude Harris, Jr. Building’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 12, 1994

Mr. BACHUS of Alabama (for himself, Mr. BEVILL, Mr. BROWDER, Mr. CALLAHAN, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. EVERETT, Mr. HILLIARD, Mr. MONTGOMERY,

Mr. ROWLAND, and Mr. HUTTO) introduced the following bill; which was

referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

OCTOBER 3, 1994

Additional sponsor: Mr. STUMP

OCTOBER 3, 1994

Reported and referred to the House Calendar, and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To designate Building Number 137 of the Tuscaloosa Veterans’ Medical Center in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, as the

‘‘Claude Harris, Jr. Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4948 RH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 Building Number 137 of the Tuscaloosa Veterans’

3 Medical Center in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, shall be known

4 and designated as the ‘‘Claude Harris, Jr. Building’’.

5 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

6 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

7 paper, or other record of the United States to the building

8 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

9 to the ‘‘Claude Harris, Jr. Building’’.

Æ
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5188

To authorize the export of medical devices to countries which have approved

such devices.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 5, 1994

Mr. KIM introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To authorize the export of medical devices to countries which

have approved such devices.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medical Device Export

5 Promotion Act of 1994’’.

6 SEC. 2. DEVICE EXPORTS.

7 In the administration of section 801 of the Federal

8 Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the Secretary of Health

9 and Human Services shall permit the export of a medical

10 device which—
2

•HR 5188 IH

1 (1) is intended for export to a country which as

2 determined by the Secretary has a medical device

3 approval process which provides reasonable assur4 ance of the safety and effectiveness of medical de5 vices,

6 (2) has been approved under the laws of the

7 country to which it is intended for export,

8 (3) is labeled on the outside of the shipping

9 package that it is intended for export, and

10 (4) is not sold or offered for sale in domestic

11 commerce.

12 A medical device which is exported under the authority

13 of this Act may not thereafter be imported into the United

14 States unless its importation has been approved by the

15 Secretary of Health and Human Services.

16 SEC. 3. REVIEW.

17 The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall

18 conduct an annual review of the medical device approval

19 laws of countries not described in section 2(1) to deter20 mine if such laws provide reasonable assurance of the safe21 ty and effectiveness of medical devices.

Æ
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Omar RODRIGUEZ-TAMEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-40445.

Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 18, 2004.

Mitchel Neurock, US Attorney’s Office, Laredo, TX, James Lee Turner, Assistant US Attorney, US Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Richard Javier Gonzalez, Laredo, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before SMITH, DEMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

Omar Rodriguez-Tamez appeals his sentence for his guilty-plea conviction of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than five kilograms of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A), and 846. Rodriguez-Tamez argues that the district court clearly erred in imposing a two-level offense-level enhancement based on his role as a manager or supervisor in the offense, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B 1.1(c).

The record does not contain sufficient reliable evidence to support the district *75court’s finding that Rodriguez-Tamez organized, led, managed, or supervised at least one other person who was criminally culpable in, though not necessarily convicted for, the offense. *See United States v. Jobe,*101 F.3d 1046, 1068 (5th Cir.1996); U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1, comment, (ns.1-2). Accordingly, Rodriguez-Tamez’s sentence is VACATED and this case is REMANDED for resentencing as to this issue, without prejudice to the possibility that an upward departure might be warranted for Rodriguez-Tamez’s management responsibility of the property, assets or activities of the conspiracy. *See Jobe,*101 F.3d at 1068 *&*n. 30; U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1, comment, (n.2).

VACATED AND REMANDED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Decided April 12, 1910.

#### MUCKLE *v.*COLUMBIA COUNTY.

[108 Pac. 120.]

Appeal and Error — Notice op Appeal — Necessity for Indorsement of Service on Notice.

1. Compliance with Section 549, B. & C. Comp., providing that, when notice has not been given in open court, appellant must, within six months from entry of the judgment, file with the clerk of the court in which the judgment is rendered the notice of appeal, with the proof of service indorsed thereon, is jurisdictional.

Appeal and Error — Notice of Appeal — Service by Officer Who Is Appellant.

2. A sheriff cannot serve the notice of appeal in a case in which he is an appellant.

From Columbia: James U. Campbell, Judge.

This is an action by James Muckle and Charles. Muckle, against Columbia County, and Martin White, sheriff. From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, the defendants appeal.

Dismissed.

*147*Mr. Lionel R. Webster*and *Messrs. Dillard & Day*for the motion.

*Mr. Edmund B. Tongue*and *Mr. M. E. Miller, contra.*

Mr. Justice Eakin

delivered the opinion of the court.

Judgment was rendered in this cause on July 21, 1909. The notice of appeal therefrom was filed January 21, 1910, but no proof of service was indorsed therein. One of the appellants, Martin White, sheriff, on February 18, 1910, obtained *ex parte*leave from the lower court permitting him to attach to the notice of appeal the certificate of said Martin White, a sheriff, that he had served the notice on January 21, 1910.

1. By statute (Section 549, B. & C. Comp.) it is provided that, when notice has not been given in open court, appellant must, within six months from the entry of the judgment, .file with the clerk of the court in which the judgment is rendered the notice of appeal, with the proof of service indorsed thereon. Compliance with this requirement is jurisdictional: *Briney*v. *Starr,*6 Or. 207; *Henness*v. *Wells,*16 Or. 266 (19 Pac. 121); *Dowell*v. *Bolt,*45 Or. 89 (75 Pac. 714); *Rodman*v. *Manning,*50 Or. 507 (93 Pac. 366).

2. Neither can the sheriff serve the notice of appeal in a case in which he is a-party appellant: *Williams*v. *Schmidt,*14 Or. 470 (13 Pac. 305). Section 539, B. & C. Comp. Each of these defects is fatal to the appeal.

The appeal is dismissed. Dismissed.
#### § 15.1 Purpose of regulations.

The regulations in this part implement the Wild Bird Conservation Act of 1992, Pub. L. 102-440, 16 U.S.C. 4901-4916.
§ 90.313 Frequency loading criteria. ( a ) Except as provided for in paragraph (b) of this section, the maximum channel loading on frequencies in the 470-512 MHz band is as follows: ( 1 ) 50 units for systems eligible in the Public Safety Pool (see § 90.20(a)).
( 2 ) 90 units for systems eligible in the Industrial/Business Pool (see § 90.35(a)).
( b ) If a licensee has exclusive use of a frequency, then the loading standards in paragraph (a) of this section, may be exceeded. If it is a shared channel, the loading standards can be exceeded upon submission of a signed statement by all those sharing the channel agreeing to the increase.
( c ) A unit is defined as a mobile transmitter-receiver. Loading standards will be applied in terms of the number of units actually in use or to be placed in use within 8 months following authorization. A licensee will be required to show that an assigned frequency pair is at full capacity before it may be assigned a second or additional frequency pair. Channel capacity may be reached either by the requirements of a single licensee or by several users sharing a channel. Until a channel is loaded to capacity it will be available for assignment to other users in the same area. A frequency pair may be reassigned at distances 64 km. (40 mi.), 32 km. (20 mi.) for Channel 15, Chicago; Channel 20, Philadelphia; and Channel 17, Washington, or more from the location of base stations authorized on that pair without reference to loading at the point of original installation. Following authorization, the licensee shall notify the Commission either during or at the close of the 8 month period of the number of units in operation. In the Industrial Radio Services, if the base station facility is to be used by more than a single licensee, the frequency assigned to it will not be reassigned for use by another facility within 64 km. (40 mi.) or 32 km. (20 mi.) where applicable for a period of 12 months, *Provided,* That the facility is constructed within 90 days from the date of the first grant, meets the loading standards to at least 50 percent within 9 months, and meets all loading standards within 12 months.
[43 FR 54791, Nov. 22, 1978, as amended at 47 FR 36649, Aug. 23, 1982; 62 FR 18933, Apr. 17, 1997]
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 08233**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  08233\08233_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement x 08233\08233_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

08233\08233_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 08233\08233_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 08233\08233_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 08233\08233_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 08233\08233_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 08233\08233_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 08233\08233_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file x 08233\Supporting Documetation\08233_Arial map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

08233\Supporting Documetation\08233_Ash Diagram.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 08233\Supporting Documetation\08233_Water Balance Diagram 2.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 08233\Supporting Documetation\08233_Water Balance Diagram.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
§ 95.2573 MedRadio authorized bandwidths. Each MedRadio transmitter type must be designed such that the MedRadio emission bandwidth (as defined in § 95.2503) does not exceed the applicable limits set forth in this section. ( a ) For MedRadio transmitters operating in the 402-405 MHz band, the maximum MedRadio emission bandwidth is 300 kHz. Such transmitters must not use more than 300 kHz of bandwidth (total) during a MedRadio communications session. This provision does not preclude full duplex or half duplex communications provided that the total bandwidth of all of the channels employed in a MedRadio communications session does not exceed 300 kHz.
( b ) For MedRadio transmitters operating in the 401-401.85 MHz band or the 405-406 MHz band, the maximum MedRadio emission bandwidth is 100 kHz. Such transmitters must not use more than 100 kHz of bandwidth (total) during a MedRadio communications session. This provision does not preclude full duplex or half duplex communications provided that the total bandwidth of all of the channels employed in a MedRadio communications session does not exceed 100 kHz.
( c ) For MedRadio transmitters operating in the 401.85-402 MHz band, the maximum MedRadio emission bandwidth is 150 kHz. Such transmitters must not use more than 150 kHz of bandwidth (total) during a MedRadio communications session. This provision does not preclude full duplex or half duplex communications, provided that the total bandwidth of all of the channels employed in a MedRadio communications session does not exceed 150 kHz.
( d ) For MedRadio transmitters operating in the 413-419 MHz, 426-432 MHz, 438-444 MHz or 451-457 MHz bands, the maximum MedRadio emission bandwidth is 6 MHz.
( e ) For MedRadio transmitters operating in the 2360-2400 MHz band, the maximum MedRadio emission bandwidth is 5 MHz.
( f ) Lesser emission bandwidths may be employed, provided that the unwanted emissions are attenuated as provided in § 95.2579. See also § 95.2567 regarding maximum radiated power limits, § 95.2565 on frequency accuracy, § 95.2569 on field strength measurements, and § 95.2585 on RF exposure.
[86 FR 53566, Sept. 28, 2021]
§ 80.3 Other applicable rule parts of this chapter. Other FCC rule parts applicable to licensees in the maritime services include the following: ( a ) *Part 0.* This part describes the Commission's organization and delegations of authority. Part 0 also lists available Commission publications, standards and procedures for access to Commission records and location on Commission monitoring stations.
( b ) *Part 1.* This part includes rules of practice and procedure for license applications, adjudicatory proceedings, procedures for reconsideration and review of the Commission's actions; provisions concerning violation notices and forfeiture proceedings; and the environmental processing requirements that, together with the procedures specified in § 17.4(c) of this chapter, if applicable, must be complied with prior to the initiation of construction. Subpart Q of part 1 contains rules governing competitive bidding procedures for resolving mutually exclusive applications for certain initial licenses.
( c ) *Part 2.* This part contains the Table of Frequency Allocations and special requirements in international regulations, recommendations, agreements, and treaties. This part also contain standards and procedures concerning marketing of radio frequency devices, and for obtaining equipment authorization.
( d ) *Part 13.* This part contains information and rules for the licensing of commercial radio operators.
( e ) *Part 17.* This part contains requirements for the construction, marking and lighting of antenna towers, and the environmental notification process that must be completed before filing certain antenna structure registration applications.
( f ) Part 20 of this chapter which governs commercial mobile radio services which include subpart J of this part (public coast stations).
( g ) *Part 21.* This part contains rules concerning point-to-point microwave service authority relating to communication common carriers.
( h ) *Part 64.* This part contains miscellaneous rules relating to communication common carriers.
( i ) *Part 68.* This part contains technical standards for connection of terminal equipment to the telephone network.
( j ) *Part 87.* This part contains rules for the aviation services. Some maritime frequencies are authorized for use by aircraft stations for safety and distress, public correpondence and for operational communications.
( k ) *Part 101.* This part contains rules concerning the private microwave service relating to point-to-point communication requirements.
[51 FR 31213, Sept. 2, 1986, as amended at 55 FR 20398, May 16, 1990; 59 FR 18499, Apr. 19, 1994; 63 FR 40062, July 27, 1998; 63 FR 68955, Dec. 14, 1998; 77 FR 3955, Jan. 26, 2012]
No. 10-10878.

No. 10-10939.

#### Cortes *v.*United States; and Brown *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 414 Fed. Appx. 189.
Exhibit 32







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Siclone Industries, Inc. a Delaware corporation (the Company), on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Bradley S. Shepherd, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







/s/ Bradley S. Shepherd

Date: May 16, 2005

Bradley S. Shepherd

Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer