### Request to Use CARES for Larger/Older Persons

I am writing to request an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b) to the extent required for Chloe Bell to be able to use an FAA Approved Child Restraint System even though she exceeds the weight limits for the CRS. In addition, if my petition is granted, I request that any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while Chloe Bell is aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)( B) to the extent necessary to allow Chloe Bell to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA

- approved child restraint system during use of that child restraint system aboard an aircraft.

I believe the pertinent section from 14 CFR part 121 from which we seek relief is Section 121.311 Seats, safety belts, and shoulder harnesses.

My **daughter** is 10 years old, weighs 55 pounds, and is 54 inches tall. My **daughter**’s physical condition is as follows: she suffers from Rett Syndrome, a neurological disorder that prevents her from walking, talking, using her hands, or even sitting up without assistance. As a result of **her** physical condition, **she** needs the support and security provided by an FAA Approved Child Restraint, but because of **her** weight is incapable of

com pliance with the regulation. **I am also submitting the following contact information:**  **Mark C Bell, 3160 Sawgrass Court, Cincinnati OH 45244, 5134902063,**  **mbell3@cinci.rr.com**

**.**

I understand that the regulation is w ritten to create a high level of safety for each individual passenger by ensuring that they are securely restrained in their seats during all phases of flight. The regulation also ensures that an individual does not cause harm to other passengers on the ai rplane by being thrown into them during turbulent or emergency conditions.

I propose that Chloe Bell be allowed to occupy an FAA Approved Child Restraint (CARES, manufactured by AmSafe, Inc.), even though **she** exceeds the manufacturer’s weight limits. This ensures a high level of safety for Chloe Bell and a high level of safety for the other passengers and crew on the airplane. In fact, in Chloe Bell’s case, safety is greatly enhanced by the extra support and security that the FAA Approved Restraint System w ill provide during the entire flight.Enhancing safety for Chloe Bell is in the public interest. In addition, the

public interest is also served by the fact that the use of this FAA Approved Child Restraint System allows **her** to use commercial air transportation. Wi thout the support and security of the FAA Approved Child Restraint System, **she** would be unable to fly commercially.

I also believe that, with certain limitations established by the FAA in a grant to this petition, there can be an equivalent level of safety to that provided by the affected regulation. The CARES restraint has been certified by the manufacturer for use by children 22

- 44 pounds. However, the components of the CARES restraint are the same as those used in restraints for adults on aircraft and would maintain their integrity if used by someone who weighed several hundred pounds.

I believe that the limit of 44 pounds was established because, with the additional weight of the child attached to the seatback, the seatback would move forward m ore quickly in an accident scenario and this might cause a higher HIC load for the person seated in the seat behind the passenger using the CARES restraint (because the seatback moving forward more quickly would mean that it would not be there to attenuate the energy from the impact of the person seated behind the person using the CARES restraint).

In order to achieve an equivalent level of safety as that provided by the affected regulation, I propose that the FAA establish a limitation in a grant to this p etition that Chloe Bell only sits in a passenger seat with no passenger seated behind her. Therefore, no unsafe condition would exist for a passenger seated behind Chloe Bell while **she** is using the CARES restraint. I also propose that all operations under this exemption be conducted with at least one of Chloe Bell’s parents or a caregiver accompanying him or her. In addition, I propose that Chloe Bell’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy of this exemption.

I also request that the processing of this petit ion not be delayed for publication and comment in the Federal Register. W e want to travel June 9

– 13. If you take the time to put this in the Federal Register, it will delay the process and we may not be able to travel in this timeframe.If it is necessa ry to put a summary in the Federal Register, I submit the following:

This is a request for an exemption from FAR 121.311 (b) to the extent required for a child to use an FAA Approved Child Restraint System on an aircraft, even though the child exceeds the weight limits for the CRS. Due to physical challenges, without the support and security of this FAA Approved Child Restraint System, this child would be unable to fly. W e request that this child be allowed to occupy an FAA Approved Child Restraint (CARES, manufactured by AmSafe, Inc.), even though s he exceeds the manufacturer’s weight limits of 44 pounds. In this case, the safety of this child is greatly enhanced by the extra support and security that the FAA Approved Restraint System will provide for her during the flight.