alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**     **CERTIFICATIONS**I, Randy K. Ferrell, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fauquier Bankshares, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.        Date: May 12, 2006 /s/  Randy K. Ferrell        Randy K. Ferrell   President and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 178 (Thursday, September 14, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 54275]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7649]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers


Notice of Availability for the Draft Environmental Impact 
Statement for Hemet/San Jacinto Integrated Recharge and Recovery 
Project, Riverside County, CA

AGENCY: Department of the Army--U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of Availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District 
(Regulatory Branch), in coordination with the Eastern Municipal Water 
District (EMWD), has completed a Draft Environmental Impact Statement 
(EIS) for the Hemet/San Jacinto Integrated Recharge and Recovery 
Project. EMWD requires authorization pursuant to Section 404 of the 
Clean Water Act for 53.1 acres of fill into waters of the U.S. A public 
hearing will be held at the Simpson Center (305 East Devonshire Avenue, 
Hemet, CA 92543) on September 19, 2006 from 5:30 to 6:30 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions or comments concerning the 
Draft EIS should be directed to Dr. Daniel P. Swenson, Regulatory 
Branch, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, P.O. Box 532711, Los Angeles, CA, 
90053, (213) 452-3414. Comments should be submitted no later than 
October 20, 2006.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.

Mark Durham,
Chief, South Coast Section, Regulatory Branch.
[FR Doc. 06-7649 Filed 9-13-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-KF-P
#### § 218.158 [Reserved]
No. 11-5165.

#### Daniel *v.*Davis, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### § 95.503 Definitions, FRS.

*Family Radio Service (FRS).* A short-distance two-way voice communication service, with limited data applications, between low power hand-held radios, for facilitating individual, family, group, recreational and business activities.

*FRS unit.* A transceiver for use in the FRS.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration # 10567 and # 10568] 

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration. 

# ACTION:

Amendment 2. 

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Texas (FEMA-1658-DR), dated 08/15/2006. 

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms and Flooding.                     

*Incident Period:*                         07/27/2006 and continuing through 08/25/2006.                     

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         09/12/2006.                     

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         10/16/2006.                     

*EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         05/15/2007.                     

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the State of Texas, dated 08/15/2006, is hereby amended to re-establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 07/27/2006 and continuing through and including 08/25/2006. The incident type is also amended and is now severe storms and flooding. 

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) 

Herbert L. Mitchell, 

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 06-7787 Filed 9-19-06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
§ 21.156 Depredation order for depredating California scrub jays and Steller's jays in Washington and Oregon. Landowners, sharecroppers, tenants, or their employees or agents actually engaged in the production of nut crops in Washington and Oregon may, without a permit, take California scrub jays (*Aphelocoma californica*) and Steller's jays (*Cyanocitta stelleri*) when found committing or about to commit serious depredations to nut crops on the premises owned or occupied by such persons: *Provided:* ( a ) That California scrub jays and Steller's jays may only be taken pursuant to this section between August 1 and December 1 in any year, in the Washington counties of Clark, Cowlitz, and Lewis; and the Oregon counties of Benton, Clackamas, Lane, Linn, Marion, Multnomah, Polk, Washington, and Yamhill.
( b ) That California scrub jays and Steller's jays taken pursuant to this section shall not be transported or sold or offered for sale except that, such transportation within the area, as may be necessary to bury or otherwise destroy the carcasses of such birds is permitted: *Provided,* That the Director of the State agricultural department, college, or other public institution may requisition such California scrub jays and Steller's jays killed as may be needed for scientific investigations.
( c ) That such birds may be taken only by trapping or shooting and on areas where serious depredations are being or are about to be committed.
( d ) That any person exercising any of the privileges granted by this section shall permit at all reasonable times, including during actual operations, any Federal or State game or deputy game agent, warden, protector, or other law enforcement officer free and unrestricted access over the premises on which such operations have been or are being conducted; and shall furnish promptly to such officer whatever information he may require, concerning said operations.
( e ) That nothing in this section shall be construed to authorize the killing of such migratory birds contrary to any State laws or regulations; and that none of the privileges granted under this section shall be exercised unless the person possesses whatever permit as may be required for such activities by the States of Washington and Oregon.
( f ) That any person authorized by this section to act under this depredation order must provide an annual report of take during the calendar year for each species by January 31st of the following year. The report must include the number of birds taken for each species, method of take, month(s) in which they were taken, county(ies) and State(s) in which they were taken, purpose of take, and disposition. Submit annual reports to the Pacific Region Migratory Bird Permit Office in Portland, Oregon, at the address shown at 50 CFR 2.2.
[39 FR 31326, Aug. 28, 1974, as amended at 84 FR 45924, Sept. 3, 2019. Redesignated at 87 FR 882, Jan. 7, 2022]
Attorney-Client Privileged and Confidential

Off Road Vehicle

Division

Constant Radius Test 

Results Comparing OnRoad vs. Off-Road Tires

3/12/15
Attorney-Client Privileged and Confidential

Off Road Vehicle

Division

2

Compare data from the same vehicle model using different tires

• Steering Wheel Input Plots

• Lateral Acceleration Plots

• Combined Understeer Plots

Vehicle: 2015 Polaris RZR 900 (locked differential) used for all tests

Objective

OEM Tire

Carlise PXT

26” OD; 10-12 psi

Automotive Tire

Kingstar Centum SK72

26” OD; 10-12 psi

Racing Slick Tire

Hoosier

22” OD; 10-12 psi
Attorney-Client Privileged and Confidential

Off Road Vehicle

Division

Steering input improves slightly with smoother tires

3

Unfiltered Steering Wheel Input

OEM Tire

Carlise PXT

26” OD; 10-12 psi

Automotive Tire

Kingstar Centum SK72

26” OD; 10-12 psi

Racing Slick Tire

Hoosier

22” OD; 10-12 psi

Max 

Fluctuation 

~140

Max 

Fluctuation 

~70

Max 

Fluctuation 

~100
Attorney-Client Privileged and Confidential

Off Road Vehicle

Division

After filtering, lateral acceleration is still noisy 

4

2Hz Filtered Lateral Acceleration Plots

OEM Tire

Carlise PXT

26” OD; 10-12 psi

Automotive Tire

Kingstar Centum SK72

26” OD; 10-12 psi

Racing Slick Tire

Hoosier

22” OD; 10-12 psi

2Hz

6Hz

As the tires get smoother, lateral acceleration increases and noise decreases
Attorney-Client Privileged and Confidential

Off Road Vehicle

Division

Even with smooth tires and filtering, understeer plots are not desirable

5

Filtered Understeer Plots

2Hz

6Hz

OEM Tire

Carlise PXT

26” OD; 10-12 psi

Automotive Tire

Kingstar Centum SK72

26” OD; 10-12 psi

Racing Slick Tire

Hoosier

22” OD; 10-12 psi

As the tires get smoother, the understeer plot is less chaotic
Attorney-Client Privileged and Confidential

Off Road Vehicle

Division

6

Driver input is a source of error and noise. It improves 

with smoother tires.

• By using the Polaris proposed fixed steer test, the driver steering 

input is completely eliminated, removing that source of error

Lateral acceleration is also a source of error even after it 

has been highly filtered. It improves with smoother tires.

• Lateral acceleration is not an acceptable pass/fail metric for testing 

vehicles with off-road tires

Summary
**Read more of the May Dispatch**
    - Fishing for Fun and Friendship: Mesa Cops and Bobbers 
    - Spotsylvania School Resource Officers Change Hearts and Minds Through Fun and Games at Summer Camp 
    - Serving Children at Home, Along with Families and Communities 
    - Multidisciplinary Child Protection Teams 
    - Celebrating the Evolution of Downtown Austin Community Court 
    - Reflections on Managing Bias Strategies for Law Enforcement 
    - A New Resource on 21st Century Policing 
    - Daniel Hahn: A Profile in Law Enforcement Leadership
#### § 1.6 Person.

*Person* means an individual, club, association, partnership, corporation, or private or public body, any one or all, as the context requires.
No. 11-5774.

#### Thompson *v.*Illinois.

App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5062 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5062

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
     limited deduction of health insurance costs of self-employed 
                              individuals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 20, 1994

   Mrs. Meyers of Kansas (for herself, Mr. Kolbe, Mrs. Morella, Mr. 
  Boehlert, Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut, Mr. Ehlers, Mr. Hobson, Mr. 
 Castle, Mr. Portman, Mr. Upton, Mr. Shays, Mr. Hoekstra, Mr. Roberts, 
 Mr. McCloskey, Mr. Goss, Mr. Penny, Mr. Cox, Mr. Ballenger, Mr. Hyde, 
   Mr. Leach, Mr. Hutto, Mr. Torricelli, Mr. Walker, Mr. Dreier, Mr. 
Holden, Mr. Kanjorski, Mr. Chapman, Mr. Klink, Mr. DeLay, Mr. Barton of 
 Texas, Mr. Regula, Mr. Blute, Mrs. Roukema, Mr. Vento, Mr. Paxon, Mr. 
Hunter, Mr. McCrery, Mr. Gallegly, Mr. Bateman, Mr. Gilman, Mr. Berman, 
   Mr. Lightfoot, Mr. Shaw, Mr. Dornan, Mr. Fawell, Mr. Solomon, Mr. 
Burton of Indiana, Mr. Wise, Mr. Oberstar, Mr. Knollenberg, Mr. Zeliff, 
  Mr. Baker of Louisiana, Mr. Torkildsen, Mr. Collins of Georgia, Mr. 
 Smith of Texas, Mr. Hastert, Mr. McInnis, and Mr. Stearns) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 
                                 Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
     limited deduction of health insurance costs of self-employed 
                              individuals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That paragragh (6) of 
section 162(l) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to 
termination date) is hereby repealed.
                                 <all>
```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"22-1915: COOPERMAN v. SSA [OPINION], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"bQSCAVytRk\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/05-16-2023-22-1915-cooperman-v-ssa-opinion-22-1915-opinion-5-16-2023_2127557\/\">22-1915: COOPERMAN v. SSA [OPINION], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/05-16-2023-22-1915-cooperman-v-ssa-opinion-22-1915-opinion-5-16-2023_2127557\/embed\/#?secret=bQSCAVytRk\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“22-1915: COOPERMAN v. SSA [OPINION], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"bQSCAVytRk\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"OPINION Posted: COOPERMAN v. SSA [OPINION](pdf) Appeal Number: 22-1915 Origin: MSPB Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) Νo 1396/2005

of 25 August 2005         

fixing the export refunds on products processed from cereals and rice

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in rice (2), and in particular Article 14(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The export refunds on the products listed in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1518/95 are hereby fixed as shown in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 26 August 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 August 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

(2)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 96. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1549/2004 (OJ L 280, 31.8.2004, p. 13).

(3)OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 55. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2993/95 (OJ L 312, 23.12.1995, p. 25).

----

ANNEX

to Commission Regulation of 25 August 2005 fixing the export refunds on products processed from cereals and rice

----

(1)  No refund shall be granted on products given a heat treatment resulting in pregelatinisation of the starch.

(2)  Refunds are granted in accordance with Council Regulation (EEC) No 2730/75 (OJ L 281, 1.11.1975, p. 20), as amended.

----
#### § 95.3331 Permissible 76-81 GHz Band Radar Service uses.

Radar systems operating in the 76-81 GHz band may operate as vehicular radars, or as fixed or mobile radars in airport air operations areas, including but not limited to FOD detection radars and aircraft-mounted radars for ground use only.
EX-10(A)(I)



 





Exhibit 10(ai)




AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO

THE LAMSON & SESSIONS CO.

NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

(POST-2004)




          THIS AMENDMENT is made this 15th day of February, 2007, by The Lamson & Sessions Co.
(hereinafter referred to as the “Company”);




WITNESSETH:




          WHEREAS, the Company maintains The Lamson & Sessions Co. Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
Plan (Post-2004) (hereinafter referred to as the “Plan”); and




          WHEREAS, the Company reserved the right to make amendments thereto.




          NOW, THEREFORE, the Company hereby amends the Plan as follows, effective January 1, 2007,
unless another date is specified.




I.




          Section 2.21 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to provide as follows:





	 	2.21	 	“Trust Agreement” shall mean the Trust Agreement or
Agreements between the Company and the Trustee in connection with the
Plan.





II.




          Section 2.22 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to provide as follows:





	 	2.22	 	“Trustee” shall mean National City Bank, any
corporate successor to a majority of its trust business, or any
successor Trustee hereunder, or any trustee designated by the Company
to hold assets in connection with the Plan.





III.




          Section 4.1 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to provide as follows:





	 	4.1	 	COMPANY MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS. For members of the
Leadership Council who participate in this Plan, the Company will
match 20% of the Annual Incentive Compensation deferred by such
Participant which is hypothetically invested in Common Shares
pursuant to Section 5.4, and use such amount to issue Restricted
Shares (as such term is defined in the 1998 Plan) to the Participant.
Such Restricted Shares will be issued under the 1998
Plan and will be subject to the terms and conditions set forth in
the 1998 Plan.




 









 











IV.




          Section 5.1 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to provide as follows:





5.1 CONTRIBUTIONS. In order to provide assets from which
to fulfill its obligations to the Participants and their
beneficiaries under the Plan, the Company may establish a
trust by a Trust Agreement with a Trustee, to which the
Company may, in its discretion, contribute cash or other
property, including Common Shares issued by the Company,
to provide for the benefit payments under the Plan.



V.




          The second sentence of Section 5.2 of the Plan is hereby amended to read as follows:





Amounts deferred by each Participant or contributed by the
Company shall be credited to such Participant’s Deferred
Compensation Account.



          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company, by its duly authorized officers, has caused this Amendment to
be executed as of the day and year first written above.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	THE LAMSON & SESSIONS CO.
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Eileen E. Clancy	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Eileen E. Clancy	 	 
	 
	 

	 	Its:
	 	Vice President
No. 11-6169.

#### Garcia-Alvarez *v.*United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.