alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 80.317 Radiotelegraph and radiotelephone alarm signals. ( a ) The international radiotelegraph alarm signal consists of a series of twelve dashes sent in one minute, the duration of each dash being four seconds and the duration of the interval between consecutive dashes one second. The purpose of this special signal is the actuation of automatic devices giving the alarm to attract the attention of the operator when there is no listening watch on the distress frequency.
( b ) The international radiotelephone alarm signal consists of two substantially sinusoidal audio frequency tones transmitted alternately. One tone must have a frequency of 2200 Hertz and the other a frequency of 1300 Hertz, the duration of each tone being 250 milliseconds. When generated by automatic means, the radiotelephone alarm signal must be transmitted continuously for a period of at least 30 seconds, but not exceeding one minute; when generated by other means, the signal must be transmitted as continuously as practicable over a period of approximately one minute. The purpose of this special signal is to attract the attention of the person on watch or to actuate automatic devices giving the alarm.
§ 17.5 Alaska natives. ( a ) The provisions of subpart C of this part relating to the importation or the taking of endangered wildlife, and any provision of subpart D of this part relating to the importation or the taking of threatened wildlife, shall not apply to: ( 1 ) Any Indian, Aleut, or Eskimo who is an Alaskan native and who resides in Alaska; or
( 2 ) Any non-native permanent resident of an Alaskan native village who is primarily dependent upon the taking of wildlife for consumption or for the creation and sale of authentic native articles of handicrafts and clothing: If the taking is primarily for subsistence purposes, and is not accomplished in a wasteful manner.
( b ) Edible portions of endangered or threatened wildlife taken or imported pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section may be sold in native villages or towns in Alaska for native consumption within native villages and towns in Alaska.
( c ) Non-edible by-products of endangered or threatened wildlife taken or imported pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section may be sold in interstate commerce when made into authentic native articles of handicrafts and clothing.
§ 80.95 Message charges. ( a ) Except as specified in § 20.15(c) of this chapter with respect to commercial mobile radio service providers, charges must not be made for service of: ( 1 ) Any public coast station unless tariffs for the service are on file with the Commission;
( 2 ) Any station other than a public coast station or an Alaska—public fixed station, except cooperatively shared stations covered by § 80.503;
( 3 ) Distress calls and related traffic; and
( 4 ) Navigation hazard warnings preceded by the SAFETY signal.
( b ) The licensee of each ship station is responsible for the payment of all charges accruing to any other station(s) or facilities for the handling or forwarding of messages or communications transmitted by that station.
( c ) In order to be included in the ITU List of Coast Stations public coast stations must recognize international Accounting Authority Identification Codes (AAIC) for purposes of billing and accounts settlement in accordance with Article 66 of the Radio Regulations. Stations which elect not to recognize international AAIC's will be removed from the ITU List of Coast Stations.
[51 FR 31213, Sept. 2, 1986, as amended at 52 FR 35244, Sept. 18, 1987; 69 FR 64671, Nov. 8, 2004]
----

            DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE         

No 16/2005

of 8 February 2005         

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following points shall be inserted after point 66o (Commission Regulation (EC) No 104/2004) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

Article 2

The texts of Regulations (EC) Nos 1702/2003 and 2042/2003 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 9 February 2005, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1), or on the day of entry into force of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 179/2004 of 9 December 2004, whichever is the later.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 8 February 2005.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Richard WRIGHT            

----

(1)OJ L 133, 26.5.2005, p. 37.

(2)OJ L 240, 7.9.2002, p. 1.

(3)OJ L 243, 27.9.2003, p. 6.

(4)OJ L 315, 28.11.2003, p. 1.

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

----
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P276Successful Tribal Community Policing Initiatives: A Resource for Communities Developing Public Safety Programs and StrategiesThe COPS Office awarded the Fox Valley Technical College's National Criminal Justice Training Center (NCJTC) a cooperative agreement in FY2008 to provide training and technical assistance to the 75 tribes and agencies awarded Tribal Resources Grant Program funds that year. NCJTC helped these tribes and agencies enhance community policing by providing training and technical assistance in community policing and other public safety issues. Successful Tribal Community Policing Initiatives: A Resource for Communities Developing Public Safety Programs and Strategies describes various tribes' experiences in developing community policing initiatives. Their contributions provide a comprehensive resource for other tribes wishing to implement community policing programs to improve public safety in their communities.By NCJTC, COPSCategories: Community Partnerships • TribalLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p276Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Nov 2013Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 00:39 (UTC-5) in 0.20 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
#### § 95.3301 Scope.

This subpart sets out the regulations that apply to radar systems operating in the 76-81 GHz band. This subpart does not apply to Level Probing Radars that operate under part 15 of this title.
#### § 73.153 Field strength measurements in support of applications or evidence at hearings.

In the determination of interference, groundwave field strength measurements will take precedence over theoretical values, provided such measurements are properly taken and presented. When measurements of groundwave signal strength are presented, they shall be sufficiently complete in accordance with § 73.186 to determine the field strength at 1 mile in the pertinent directions for that station. The antenna resistance measurements required by § 73.186 need not be taken or submitted.

[44 FR 36037, June 20, 1979, as amended at 56 FR 64862, Dec. 12, 1991]
#### § 219.32 Effective dates.

Regulations in this subpart are effective from October 21, 2021, through October 21, 2026.
Stephen Perkins, Director

Office of Ecosystem Protection U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 5 Post Office Squm’e - Suite t00 Boston, MA 02109-3912 perkins.stephen@epa.gov



# STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

December 9, 2010

Re; Final Proposed Regulatory Language and Status Report: Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Permitting in Connecticut
Dear Mr. Perkins: As promised in the letter from Commissioner Marrella dated September 2 t, 2010 to Administrator Spalding, I am writing to you regarding the status of the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection’s (DEP’s) efforts to process regulatory revisions to the Title V and new source review permitting programs to include GHG emissions at the applicability thresholds defined in Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Title V Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule (75 FR 31514; June 3, 2010). DEP is making progress towm’ds adoption of the regulatory revisions at a speed consistent with meeting the March t, 2011 SIP submission deadline. DEP held a public hem’ing on the proposed regulatory revisions on October 18, 20 I0 and received comment on the proposal, including corrective comments from your office. DEP considered all the submitted comments and made revisions to the proposal. The resulting final draft of the regulation and a report that responds to the submitted comments is now at Connecticut’s Office of Attorney General for review prior to submission to the Legislative Regulations Review Committee (LRRC). DEP will be submitting this final proposal to the LRRC as soon as possible after December 27, 2010, the end of a mandatory 20-day notice period required by Connecticut’s regulatory adoption laws. We appreciate your willingness to parallel process your approval with the Connecticut regulatory adoption process. As the post-hearing draft of the regulatory revisions represents DEP’s final proposal, we request that you use this version of the regulatory revisions, rather than the version released for public comment, in drafting your Federal Register notice. This will be helpful to both of our agencies as the post-hearing draft includes corrections in response to a number of EPA’s comments. The final proposed regulatory revisions and the response to comment report are available on DEP’s website at the following location: ht~p://www.ct.~/cwp/view.asp?a=2684&q=331220&depNav GID=1619 Should you or your staff have any questions regarding this submittal, please call Gary Rose, Director, Engineering and Enforcement, at 860-424-3468.

Donald Daht, U.S. EPA, Region 1 Sincerely yours,

Anne R. Gobin, Chief Bureau of Air Management

(Printed on Recycled Paper) 79EIrnStl~et  ̄ Halaford, CT 06106-5127

www.ct,gov/dep An Equal Opportunity Employer
```

[Federal Register: January 20, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 12)]
[Notices]               
[Page 3274]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr20ja10-116]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

 
Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending December 2, 2009

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et seq.). The due date for Answers, 
Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-1997-2155.
    Date Filed: December 2, 2009.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: December 23, 2009.
    Description: Application of Arctic Transportation Systems, Inc. 
requesting reissuance of its certificate of public convenience and 
necessity in the name of Ryan Air, Inc.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2010-933 Filed 1-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 134161 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 134161 

 COA: 273321 

Calhoun CC: 99-001331-FH 

FRANKLIN BALLARD, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 20, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

d0917 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 24, 2007 

 Clerk
No. 10-10907.

#### Welsh *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Notice of Reduction of Commitments


 Exhibit 10.1 
 NOTICE OF REDUCTION OF COMMITMENTS 
 March 13, 2007 
 Mr. Daniel Wolf 
 Ableco Finance LLC, as Administrative Agent

 299 Park Avenue, 22nd Floor 
 New York, New York 10171

  

			
	Re:	 	Financing Agreement dated October 19, 2006 (as amended, the “Financing Agreement”) by and among Omega Protein Corporation (“Omega”) and
Omega Protein, Inc., as borrowers (“Borrowers”), the subsidiaries of Omega named therein as guarantors, the financial institutions from time to time party thereto, as lenders, and Ableco Finance LLC, as collateral agent and
administrative agent (“Administrative Agent”).

 Dear Dan: 
 Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Notice shall have the meanings given such terms in the Financing Agreement. 
 Pursuant to Section 2.05(a)(i) of the Financing Agreement, Omega, on behalf of the Borrowers, does hereby give notice to the Administrative Agent of a reduction in the Total Revolving Credit Commitment by $15,000,000
effective as of March 16, 2007 (the “Effective Date”). From and after the Effective Date, the Total Revolving Credit Commitment shall be equal to $15,000,000. 
 Please acknowledge your receipt of this Notice by signing in the space provided below and returning a signed copy of this Notice to Bob Stockton via
facsimile 713-940-6122 or email (bstockton@omegaproteininc.com). Feel free to contact Bob Stockton or John Held with any questions. 
  

									
		 		 		 	Sincerely,
				
		 		 		 	OMEGA PROTEIN CORPORATION
					
		 		 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Robert W. Stockton

		 		 		 		 	Robert W. Stockton
		 		 		 		 	Chief Financial Officer
	Received on March 13, 2007:	 		 		 	
				
	ABLECO FINANCE LLC, as Administrative Agent	 		 		 	
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Daniel E. Wolf
	 		 		 	
		 	Daniel E. Wolf, Senior Vice President
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6821

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; JOHN ASHCROFT,

Plaintiffs - Appellees,

versus

DOUGLAS ALAN JARVIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge.

(CR-91-70-N, CA-91-235-2)

Submitted: June 20, 2001 Decided: June 28, 2001

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Douglas Alan Jarvis, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart,

Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Douglas Alan Jarvis appeals the district court’s order denying

his “Motion to Reconsider Transfer Order,” construed as a motion

for reconsideration of the district court’s order construing his 28

U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition as a 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000) motion, and dismissing it without prejudice as successive.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Jarvis, Nos. CR-91-70-N;

CA-91-235-2 (E.D. Va. Apr. 27, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 95.947 [Reserved]
No. 11-8781.

#### Gzikowski *v.*Busby, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Pursuant to the provisions of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 10:30 a.m. on Tuesday, September 5, 2006, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's Board of Directors will meet in closed session, pursuant to section 552b(c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B), and (c)(10) Title 5, United States Code, to consider matters relating to the Corporation's enforcement and corporate activities.

The meeting will be held in the Board Room on the sixth floor of the FDIC Building located at 550 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC.

Requests for further information concerning the meeting may be directed to Mr. Robert E. Feldman, Assistant Executive Secretary of the Corporation, at (202) 898-7122.

Dated: August 29, 2006.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Robert E. Feldman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 06-7419 Filed 8-30-06; 1:05 pm]

BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
§ 100.20 Request for reconsideration. ( a ) Regulations in subparts C and D of this part published in the Federal Register are subject to requests for reconsideration.
( b ) Any aggrieved person may file a request for reconsideration with the Board.
( c ) To file a request for reconsideration, you must notify the Board in writing within sixty (60) days of the effective date or date of publication of the notice, whichever is earlier, for which reconsideration is requested.
( d ) It is your responsibility to provide the Board with sufficient narrative evidence and argument to show why the action by the Board should be reconsidered. The Board will accept a request for reconsideration only if it is based upon information not previously considered by the Board, demonstrates that the existing information used by the Board is incorrect, or demonstrates that the Board's interpretation of information, applicable law, or regulation is in error or contrary to existing law. You must include the following information in your request for reconsideration: ( 1 ) Your name, and mailing address;
( 2 ) The action which you request be reconsidered and the date of Federal Register publication of that action;
( 3 ) A detailed statement of how you are adversely affected by the action;
( 4 ) A detailed statement of the facts of the dispute, the issues raised by the request, and specific references to any law, regulation, or policy that you believe to be violated and your reason for such allegation;
( 5 ) A statement of how you would like the action changed.
( e ) Upon receipt of a request for reconsideration, the Board shall transmit a copy of such request to any appropriate Regional Council and the Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADFG) for review and recommendation. The Board shall consider any Regional Council and ADFG recommendations in making a final decision.
( f ) If the request is justified, the Board shall implement a final decision on a request for reconsideration after compliance with 5 U.S.C. 551-559 (APA).
( g ) If the request is denied, the decision of the Board represents the final administrative action.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 501

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to include foreign deposits

in the assessment base.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 21, 1993

Mr. DARDEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs

A BILL

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to include

foreign deposits in the assessment base.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FOREIGN DEPOSITS INCLUDED IN ASSESSMENT

4 BASE.

5 Subparagraph (B) of section 7(b)(5) of the Federal

6 Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(b)(5)) is amended

7 by striking ‘‘any deposits received in any office of the de8 pository institution for deposit in any other office of the

9 depository institution located in the United States, the

10 District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, American
2

•HR 501 IH

1 Samoa, the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, or the

2 Virgin Islands, except’’ and inserting ‘‘any deposits, and

3 any obligations which would constitute deposits as defined

4 in section 3(l) but for subparagraphs (A) and (B) of sec5 tion 3(l)(5), received in any office of the depository institu6 tion (other than a foreign branch of a foreign bank (as

7 such term is defined in section 1(b)(7) of the International

8 Banking Act)), except’’.

Æ