alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
44 Canal Cent er Pl aza ▪ Sui t e 310 ▪ Al exandr i a, Vi r gi ni a 22314 ▪ Tel : (703) 684-0084 ▪ Fax: (703) 684-0427

VIA E-MAIL

July 1, 2010

Mr. Jeffrey A. Telander

Sector Policies and Programs Division

Metals and Minerals Group (D243-02)

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

109 TW Alexander Drive

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Mr. William Neuffer

Sector Policies and Programs Division

Metals and Minerals Group (D243-02)

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

109 TW Alexander Drive 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

RE: Submission of Existing Emissions Data- FiberTEK Insulation, LLC

Dear Messrs. Telander and Neuffer:

The transmission of this data from the North American Insulation Manufacturers Association 

(“NAIMA”) to the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) is in fulfillment of FiberTEK 

Insulation, LLC and NAIMA’s commitment to provide EPA existing emissions data identified in 

NAIMA’s May 5, 2010 letter to EPA.

NAIMA is submitting .pdf versions via E-mail of existing emissions data for formaldehyde, 

methanol, phenol, and particulate matter from the Koogler & Associates report entitled 

“Emission Measurements of Formaldehyde, Methanol, Phenol, Particulate Matter and Visible 

Emissions.” This data was collected at FiberTEK’s Lakeland, Florida facility. FiberTEK’s 

Nephi, Utah facility is not fully operational, so no data is available.

FiberTEK has not designated any portion of this report as confidential business information

(“CBI”). With the other company submissions that you will receive from NAIMA, CBI will be 

redacted from the copies sent to you, and the CBI will be marked as such and will be sent to:

Mr. Roberto Morales, Document Control Officer
109 T.W. Alexander Drive

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me or Chris Martin at (703) 684-0084.

We can also be contacted by e-mail at arcane@naima.org or cmartin@naima.org.

Sincerely,

Angus E. Crane 

Angus E. Crane

Executive Vice President, General Counsel

North American Insulation Manufacturers Association

Ph: (703) 684-0084 ext. 123

Fax: (703) 684-0427

Attachment
#### § 80.81 Antenna requirements for ship stations.

All telephony emissions of a ship station or a marine utility station on board ship within the frequency band 30-200 MHz must be vertically polarized.
EXHIBIT
10.29


MATERIAL
TERMS OF COMPENSATION FOR 

NON-EMPLOYEE MEMBERS 

OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2007


Each non-employee member
of WPT Enterprises, Inc.’s Board of Directors will receive the following as
compensation for serving on the Board of Directors:


·                  Annual
payment of $50,000. 


·                  Chairman
of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors will be paid an additional
annual payment of $10,000. 


·                  Chairman
of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors will be paid an additional
annual payment of $5,000.


·                  On
the date of each non-employee director’s re-election to the Board, a
non-qualified stock option under the Company’s 2004 Stock Incentive Plan to
purchase 4,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price per share equal to
the fair market value per share of the common stock will be granted.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CFO AS REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14 or 15d-14 OF 
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Zap.Com Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for the periods presented
in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
    5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
    /s/
Leonard DiSalvo
 16
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6437
SCOTT SOWELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LLOYD L. WATERS; RICHARD A. LANHAM; P. RAFFERTY; UNKNOWN HOUSING OFFICER; CAPTAIN SCOTT; CHARLES POTTS, M.D., Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-3590-JFM) Submitted: August 15, 1996 Decided: August 20, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Scott Sowell, Appellant Pro Se. Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF M ARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Roy Leonard Mason, Deborah Maude Peyton, MASON, KETTERMAN & MORGAN, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sowell v. Waters , No. CA-94-3590-JFM (D. Md. Mar. 5, 1996).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 7.15 Generally. ( a ) For purposes of §§ 7.15 through 7.16, the term “manufacturers” shall denote any manufacturer of telecommunications equipment or customer premises equipment which performs a voicemail or interactive menu function.
( b ) All manufacturers of telecommunications equipment or customer premises equipment and all providers of voicemail and interactive menu services, as defined under this subpart, are subject to the enforcement provisions specified in the Act and the rules in this chapter.
( c ) The term “provider” shall denote any provider of voicemail or interactive menu service.
[83 FR 44842, Sept. 4, 2018]
No. 11-9671.

#### Babiker *v.*City of New Orleans, Louisiana, et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 95.1951 Certification.

Each CTS and RTU transmitter must be certified for use in the 218-219 MHz Service in accordance with subpart J of part 2 of this chapter.
§ 95.2905 PLB registration. Each PLB owner must initially register their PLB with National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and must advise NOAA of any subsequent change of ownership or other change in the registration information. Each PLB is registered by its identification code (*see* § 95.2987(b)). ( a ) PLB owners are encouraged to register their PLBs through the internet using the following Web site: *http://www.beaconregistration.noaa.gov*
( b ) PLB owners may also register their PLBs by mailing a completed registration card to the following address: NOAA SARSAT Beacon Registration, NSOF, E/SPO53, 1315 East West Hwy., Silver Spring, MD 20910-9684.
From:•King.Melanie@epamail.epa.gov

Sent:•Tuesday, August 10, 2010 9:56 AM To:•Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov Cc:•Talcott.Fred@epamail.epa.gov; horowitz.michael@epamail.epa.gov; Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov Subject:•revised MACT floor memo Attachments:•SI RICE NESHAP MACT floor 8-10-10.doc

(See attached file: SI RICE NESHAP MACT floor 8-10-10.doc)

Melanie King Energy Strategies Group Sector Policies and Programs Division Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Mail Code D243-01 RTP, NC 27711

Phone: (919) 541-2469 Fax: (919) 541-5450 king.melanie@epa.gov
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 17 (Thursday, January 26, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4396-4397]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-731]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA 2005-23169; Notice 2]


Cooper Tire & Rubber Company, Grant of Petition for Decision of 
Inconsequential Noncompliance

    Cooper Tire & Rubber Company (Cooper) has determined that certain 
tires that it produced in 2005 do not comply with S4.3(a) of 49 CFR 
571.109, Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 109, ``New 
Pneumatic Tires'' and with 49 CFR Part 574.5, ``Tire Identification 
Requirements.'' Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h), Cooper has 
petitioned for a determination that this noncompliance is 
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety and has filed an appropriate 
report pursuant to 49 CFR Part 573, ``Defect and Noncompliance 
Reports.'' Notice of receipt of a petition was published, with a 30-day 
comment period, on December 9, 2005 in the Federal Register (70 FR 
73324). NHTSA received no comments.
    Affected are a total of approximately 668 size 235/70R15 tires 
produced during the period January 9, 2005 through June 18, 2005. 
S4.3(a) and Part 574.5(b) require a tire identification number (TIN) on 
the tire which includes a size designation. The noncompliant tires were 
molded with the letters ``4E'' as the size designation. The correct 
stamping should have been ``TY.''
    Cooper believes that the noncompliance is inconsequential to motor 
vehicle safety and that no corrective action is warranted. Cooper 
states that the purpose of the TIN is to

[[Page 4397]]

facilitate notifying consumers in the event of a recall. Cooper says 
that if it was required to notify purchasers, ``the subject tires could 
be easily identified.''Cooper points out that the correct tire size is 
stamped on the sidewall, and the tires meet all other requirements of 
FMVSS No. 109 and 49 CFR 574.5.
    NHTSA agrees with Cooper that the noncompliance is inconsequential 
to motor vehicle safety. As Cooper points out, the tires do not have 
sidewall markings which provide the correct size for the user of this 
information. In addition, the incorrect marking does not affect the 
ability to identify the tires in the event of recall. Cooper has 
corrected the problem.
    In consideration of the foregoing, NHTSA has decided that the 
petitioner has met its burden of persuasion that the noncompliance 
described is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety. Accordingly, 
Cooper's petition is granted and the petitioner is exempted from the 
obligation of providing notification of, and a remedy for, the 
noncompliance.

(Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120; delegations of authority at CFR 
1.50 and 501.8)


    Issued on January 20, 2006.
Daniel C. Smith,
Associate Administrator for Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 06-731 Filed 1-25-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-M
69–008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 106–93

PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 472, LOCAL

CENSUS QUALITY CHECK ACT

APRIL 14 (legislative day APRIL 13), 1999.—Referred to the House Calendar and

ordered to be printed

Mr. SESSIONS, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 138]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 138, by a non-record vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 472, the

‘‘Local Census Quality Check Act,’’ under a structured rule. The

rule provides one hour of debate in the House divided equally between the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Government Reform.

Upon adoption of the resolution, the amendment printed in this

report is considered adopted. The rule provides for the consideration of amendment numbered one printed in the Congressional

Record, if offered by Rep. Maloney of New York or her designee,

which shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled between the proponent and an opponent. Finally, the rule

provides for one motion to recommit, with or without instructions.

AMENDMENT CONSIDERED AS ADOPTED

Summary

Miller (FL): Technical amendment which corrects certain section

numbers.

Text

Page 2, line 7, strike ‘‘142’’ and insert ‘‘141’’.

Page 2, line 8, strike ‘‘143’’ and insert ‘‘142’’.
2

Page 4, line 25, strike ‘‘142’’ and insert ‘‘141’’.

Page 4, after line 25, strike ‘‘143’’ and insert ‘‘142’’.

Æ
§ 76.79 Records available for public inspection. A copy of every annual employment report, and any other employment report filed with the Commission, and complaint report that has been filed with the Commission, and copies of all exhibits, letters, and other documents filed as part thereof, all amendments thereto, all correspondence between the cable entity and the Commission pertaining to the reports after they have been filed in all documents incorporated therein by reference, unless specifically exempted from the requirement, are open for public inspection at the offices of the Commission in Washington, DC. Note to § 76.59 :
Cable operators must also comply with the public file requirements § 76.1702.
[65 FR 7459, Feb. 15, 2000]
Case 16-25644 Doc 4 Filed 08/10/16 Entered 08/10/16 10:48:16 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-25644 Doc 4 Filed 08/10/16 Entered 08/10/16 10:48:16 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Chong Liang Pu, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of China Evergreen Environmental Corporation (registrant):

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.

Date:
September 25, 2006



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Chong Liang Pu     
|Chong Liang Pu         
|Chief Executive Officer
§ 73.158 Directional antenna monitoring points. ( a ) When a licensee of a station using a directional antenna system finds that a field monitoring point, as specified on the station authorization, is no longer accessible or is unsuitable because of nearby construction or other disturbances to the measured field, an application to change the monitoring point location, including FCC Form 302-AM, is to be promptly submitted to the FCC in Washington, DC. ( 1 ) If the monitoring point has become inaccessible or otherwise unsuitable, but there has been no significant construction or other change in the vicinity of the monitoring point which may affect field strength readings, the licensee shall select a new monitoring point from the points measured in the last full proof of performance. A recent field strength measurement at the new monitoring point shall also be provided.
( 2 ) Alternatively, if changes in the electromagnetic environment have affected field strength readings at the monitoring point, the licensee shall submit the results of a partial proof of performance, analyzed in accordance with § 73.154, on the affected radial.
( 3 ) The licensee shall submit an accurate, written description of the new monitoring point in relation to nearby permanent landmarks.
( 4 ) The licensee shall submit a photograph showing the new monitoring point in relation to nearby permanent landmarks that can be used in locating the point accurately at all times throughout the year. Do not use seasonal or temporary features in either the written descriptions or photographs as landmarks for locating field points.
( b ) When the description of the monitoring point as shown on the station license is no longer correct due to road or building construction or other changes, the licensee must prepare and file with the FCC, in Washington, DC, a request for a corrected station license showing the new monitoring point description. The request shall include the information specified in paragraphs (a)(3) and (4) of this section, and a copy of the station's current license.
[66 FR 20757, Apr. 25, 2001, as amended at 84 FR 2758, Feb. 8, 2019]
No. 11-10096.

#### Springer v. United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
1 August!24,!2015

US!Department!of!Transportation

, Docket!Operations

1200!New!Jersey!Ave.,!SE

West!Building!Ground!Floor,!Room!W12

K 140

Washington,!DC!20590

RE:!Request!for! Amendment under!Section!333!of!the!FAA!Modernization!and!Reform!Act!and!Part!11!of!

t he!Federal!Aviation!Regulations!for!additional!UASs

Exemption!#!12516! FAA!Docket!No.!FAA

K 2015

K 1566

Dear!Sir!or!Madam:

FBAP!Inc.!(FBAP) requests!an!amendment!to!our!Section!333!Exemption!No.! 12516,! Docket! FAA

K 2015

K 1566.

In!order!to!provide!the!safest!p ossible!service,!we!consistently!look!to!new!and!better!technology.! To!

meet!that!need,!w e!would!like!to!add!the!following!UAS s to!our!exemption:! DJI!Phantom!3, DJI!s900,!DJI!

s1000

, 3DR!Solo, FreeF ly!Alta

, and FreeFly!CineStar

.!

FBAP!would!not!set!preceden t.! These! UAS s are all!standard!production!models!and have!been!approved!

in!other!exemptions :

DJI!Phantom!3!

K Precedent setting e xemptions#!11804A,! 11728A,!12117,!11447B

K Manual:! http://download.dji

K innovations.com/downloads/phantom_3/en/Phantom_3_Professional_Quick_Start_Guide_en_v1.2.

pdf

DJI! s900!

K Precedent setting e xemptions#!12301,!12281,!12410,! 11914,!11804A

K Manual :! http://download.dji

K innovations.com/downloads/s900/en/S900_User_Manual_v1.2_en.pdf

DJI! s1000

K Precedent setting e xemptions#!12301,!12281,!12410,! 111 84,!11160

K Manual:! http://download.dji

K innovations.com/downloads/s1000/en/S1000_User_Manual_v1.10_en.pdf

3DR!Solo

K Precedent setting e xemptions!#11309 A,!11935, 12120,!11240A,!11274A

K Manual:! http://3drobotics.com/wp

K content/uploads/2015/08/v5_08_ 21_15.pdf 

# Request!for!Amendment2 FreeFly! Alta

K Precedent setting exemptions #11728A,!12103

K Manual:! http://d27w8s76bjlz9v.cloudfront.net/wp

K content/uploads/2015/07/28175748/ALTA_Manual_RevB.pdf

FreeFly!Cinestar

K Precedent setting e xemptions #! 11804A,! 12092,!11253A,!11825

K Manual:! http://d27w8s76bjlz9v.cloudfront.net/wp

K content/uploads/2014/07/cinestar8Manual

K v4.pdf

The ab ove!listed UAS s will!be!used!in! accordance!with!exemption!No.!12516!to!conduct!aerial!

photography!and!cinematography.!The!UASs!require the!same!procedures as!the!UAS!that!hav e!already!

been!approved!for!use.

FBAP!thanks!you!for!your!time!and!prompt!consideration!of!the!requested!amendment!for!Exemption!No.!

12516.!Please!do!not!hesitate!to!contact!FBAP!should!you!have!any!questions!or!should!you!require!any!

a dditional!information!to!support!the!request.!

Sincerely,

Thomas!M.!Hirschmann

FBAP!Inc.

699!Osceola!Ave.

Winter!Park,!FL!32789

Email:! tom@flybyap.com

Phone:!407

K 280

K 3332
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 160 (Friday, August 18, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 47780]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7046]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, September 15, 2006.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Enforcement Matters.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Eileen A. Donovan,
Acting Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 06-7046 Filed 8-16-06; 11:51 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
#### § 90.350 Scope.

The Intelligent Transportation Systems radio service is for the purpose of integrating radio-based technologies into the nation's transportation infrastructure and to develop and implement the nation's intelligent transportation systems. It includes the Location and Monitoring Service (LMS) and Dedicated Short Range Communications Service (DSRCS). Rules as to eligibility for licensing, frequencies available, and any special requirements for services in the Intelligent Transportation Systems radio service are set forth in this subpart.

[64 FR 66410, Nov. 26, 1999]
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-11685, 33-88135, 333-40930, 333-49298, 333-85861, 333-106422, 333-110245, 333-112011, 333-113629, 333-116548, 333-125081, 333-130969, 333-136511, 333-147288 and 333-148197) and Form S-3 (No. 333-108343)of Electronics For Imaging, Inc. of our report dated February 29, 2008, relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

**/s/    PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP**

San Jose, California 

February 29, 2008