alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with this amended annual report on Form 10-K/A of Mercury Interactive Corporation (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

I, Anthony
Zingale, Chief Executive Officer of Mercury Interactive Corporation, certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

(2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Mercury Interactive Corporation.



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|Date: July 3, 2006                     
|                                       
|/S/    ANTHONY ZINGALE                 
|Anthony Zingale Chief Executive Officer
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0797Understanding Firearms Assaults Against Law Enforcement Officers in the United StatesThis publication attempts to answer important questions regarding firearm assaults against law enforcement officers. Initially prepared as a framework for discussion in the 2014 Officer Safety and Wellness (OSW) Group roundtable dedicated to identifying best practices for reducing firearm assaults and ambushes, this publication reviews the group's findings on law enforcement policies, procedures, training, and agency characteristics that can reduce officer deaths and injuries. It is divided into three sections: the meeting's findings and recommendations, a review of 50 years of literature written about situational factors that could lead to assaults, and data identified through a current study.By Joseph B. Kuhns, Diana Dolliver, Emily Bent, Edward R. MaguireCategories: Police OperationsLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0797Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Mar 2016Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 02:28 (UTC-5) in 0.20 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
Order filed September 23, 2020 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-20-00479-CV

____________

IN THE INTEREST OF K.J.R. A/K/A K.R. AND K.J.R., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 313th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2019-02125J

ORDER

On September 21, 2020, appellant filed a brief, which was rejected because

it did not comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.4(j)(4). See Tex. R. 

App. P. 9.4(j)(4). On the same day, we requested that appellant re-file the brief 

within one business day. Appellant has not re-filed the brief; therefore, no brief is 

on file with this court. We order appellant’s appointed counsel, Angela Elisabeth 

Ellis, to re-file appellant’s brief no later than September 25, 2020. If the brief is not 

filed by that date, counsel may be required to show cause why she should not be 

held in contempt of court.

PER CURIAM
Panel Consists of Justices Christopher, Jewell, and Zimmerer.
Case 16-27423 Doc 10 Filed 08/31/16 Entered 09/01/16 09:24:10 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-2879
In Re: REGINALD L. FRAZIER, Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (MISC-490-3-5-F) Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 28, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Reginald L. Frazier, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Reginald Frazier appeals the district court's denial of hisapplication for reinstatement to practice law in the Eastern District of North Carolina. In addition, he petitions this court for a writ of mandamus or prohibition directing the district court to grant his application. Frazier was disbarred in North Carolina in 1989, and his petition for reinstatement was denied in 1995. Since Frazier is not a licensed attorney, we find no error in the district court's ruling and deny the petition for writ of mandamus or prohibition. Frazier's application to proceed in forma pauperis is denied and this matter is dismissed. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in thematerials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 78.51 Remote control operation. ( a ) A CARS station may be operated by remote control: *Provided,* That such operation is conducted in accordance with the conditions listed below: *And provided further,* That the Commission, in Washington, DC, is notified at least 10 days prior to the beginning of such operation and that such notification is accompanied by a detailed description showing the manner of compliance with the following conditions: ( 1 ) The transmitter and associated control system shall be installed and protected in a manner designed to prevent tampering or operation by unauthorized persons.
( 2 ) An operator shall be on duty at the remote control position and in actual charge thereof at all times when the station is in operation.
( 3 ) Facilities shall be provided at the control position which will permit the operator to turn the transmitter on and off at will. The control position shall also be equipped with suitable devices for observing the overall characteristics of the transmissions and a carrier operated device which will give a continuous visual indication whenever the transmitting antenna is radiating a signal. The transmitting apparatus shall be inspected as often as may be necessary to insure proper operation.
( 4 ) The control circuits shall be so designed and installed that short circuits, open circuits, other line faults, or any other cause which would result in loss of control of the transmitter will automatically cause the transmitter to cease radiating.
( b ) An application for authority to construct a new station or to make changes in the facilities of an existing station and which proposes operation by remote control shall include an adequate showing of the manner of compliance with the requirements of this section.
( c ) The Commission may notify the licensee not to commence remote control operation, or to cancel, suspend, or change the date of the beginning of such operation as and when such action may appear to be in the public interest, convenience, or necessity.
[37 FR 3292, Feb. 12, 1972, as amended at 41 FR 29695, July 19, 1976; 49 FR 20671, May 16, 1984; 50 FR 23421, June 4, 1985]
Order entered August 15, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 01077
- CV
IN RE TODD TOMASELLA , Relator On Appeal from the 86th District Court Kaufman County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 61378 

### O RDER
The Court has b efore it relator = s petition for writ of habeas corpus and request for interim relief. Pending this Court’s determination of relator = s petition on the merits and until further order of this Court, it is ORDERED that relator Todd Tomasella be released from the custody of the Sheriff of Kaufman County only upon his posting a good and sufficient cash bond, conditioned as required by law, in the sum of $47,774.31, plus all expenses which may be incurred by peace officers in rearresting relator in the event that relator fails to appear at any hearing before this Court or violates some other condition of the bond.In the event relator Todd Tomasella gives such bond, the Sheriff of Kaufman County is

ORDERED to immediately forward a certified copy of the bond to th e Clerk of this Court. This order releases relator Todd Tomasella only from custody under the written order dated March 28, 2013, entitled Order for Writ of Commitment for Todd Michael Tomasella, and Setting of Bond, issued by the 86th Judicial District C ourt of Kaufman County, Texas, in the case styled In the Interest of M.D.T., a Child. The Court requests that real party in interest and respondent file any responses to the petition by August 26, 2013.

/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG JUSTICE
#### § 95.369 [Reserved]
----

----

I Tiesību akti, kuru publicēšana ir obligāta

----

KOMISIJAS REGULA (EK) Nr. 1434/2005

(2005. gada 1. septembris),

ar kuru nosaka standarta ievešanas vērtības nolūkā noteikt ievešanas cenuatsevišķu veidu augļiem un dārzeņiem

EIROPAS KOPIENU KOMISIJA,

ņemot vērā Eiropas Kopienas dibināšanas līgumu,

ņemot vērā Padomes 1994. gada 21. decembra Regulu (EK) Nr. 3223/94 par sīki izstrādātiem augļu un dārzeņu ievešanas režīma izpildes noteikumiem (1), un jo īpaši tās 4. panta 1. punktu,

tā kā:

IR PIEŅĒMUSI ŠO REGULU.

1. pants

Standarta ievešanas vērtības, kas paredzētas Regulas (EK) Nr. 3223/94 4. pantā, ir tādas, kā norādīts tabulā, kas pievienota pielikumā.

2. pants

Šī regula stājas spēkā 2005. gada 2. septembrī.

Šī regula uzliek saistības kopumā un ir tieši piemērojama visās dalībvalstīs.

Briselē, 2005. gada 1. septembrī

Komisijas vārdā —

lauksaimniecības un lauku attīstības ģenerāldirektors

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

----

(1)OV L 337, 24.12.1994., 66. lpp. Regulā jaunākie grozījumi izdarīti ar Regulu (EK) Nr. 1947/2002 (OV L 299, 1.11.2002., 17. lpp.).

----

PIELIKUMS

Komisijas 2005. gada 1. septembra Regulai, ar kuru nosaka standarta ievešanas vērtības nolūkā noteikt ievešanas cenu atsevišķu veidu augļiem un dārzeņiem

----

(1)  Valstu nomenklatūra, kas paredzēta Komisijas Regulā (EK) Nr. 750/2005 (OV L 126, 19.5.2005., 12. lpp.). Kods “999” nozīmē “citas izcelsmes vietas”.

----

----

KOMISIJAS REGULA (EK) Nr. 1435/2005

(2005. gada 1. septembris)

par B sistēmas izvešanas atļauju izdošanu augļu un dārzeņu nozarē (galda vīnogām)

EIROPAS KOPIENU KOMISIJA,

ņemot vērā Eiropas Kopienas dibināšanas līgumu,

ņemot vērā Padomes 1996. gada 28. oktobra Regulu (EK) Nr. 2200/96 par augļu un dārzeņu tirgus kopējo organizāciju (1),

ņemot vērā Komisijas 2001. gada 8. oktobra Regulu (EK) Nr. 1961/2001 par sīki izstrādātiem izpildes noteikumiem Padomes Regulai (EK) Nr. 2200/96 attiecībā uz eksporta kompensācijām augļu un dārzeņu tirgus nozarē (2), un jo īpaši tās 6. panta 6. punktu,

tā kā:

IR PIEŅĒMUSI ŠO REGULU.

1. pants

Attiecībā uz galda vīnogām B sistēmas izvešanas atļauju pieteikumus, kas iesniegti saskaņā ar Regulas (EK) Nr. 951/2005 1. pantu, kam produktu izvešanas deklarācija pieņemta pēc 2005. gada 2. septembra un pirms 16. septembra, noraida.

2. pants

Šī regula stājas spēkā 2005. gada 2. septembrī.

Šī regula uzliek saistības kopumā un ir tieši piemērojama visās dalībvalstīs.

Briselē, 2005. gada 1. septembrī

Komisijas vārdā —

lauksaimniecības un lauku attīstības ģenerāldirektors

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

----

(1)OV L 297, 21.11.1996., 1. lpp. Regulā jaunākie grozījumi izdarīti ar Komisijas Regulu (EK) Nr. 47/2003 (OV L 7, 11.1.2003., 64. lpp.).

(2)OV L 268, 9.10.2001., 8. lpp. Regulā jaunākie grozījumi izdarīti ar Regulu (EK) Nr. 386/2005 (OV L 62, 9.3.2005., 3. lpp.).

(3)OV L 160, 23.6.2005., 19. lpp. Regulā jaunākie grozījumi izdarīti ar Regulu (EK) Nr. 1078/2005 (OV L 177, 9.7.2005., 3. lpp.).

----
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4870

To amend the San Carlos Apache Tribe Water Rights Settlement Act of

1992 to extend the deadline for completing certain actions described therein.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 1, 1994

Ms. ENGLISH of Arizona introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Natural Resources

A BILL

To amend the San Carlos Apache Tribe Water Rights Settlement Act of 1992 to extend the deadline for completing

certain actions described therein.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 3711(b)(1) of title XXXVII of the San Car4 los Apache Tribe Water Rights Settlement Act of 1992

5 (106 Stat. 4752) is amended by striking out ‘‘December

6 31, 1994’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘December 31,

7 1995’’.

Æ
§ 90.119 Application requirements. ( a ) Part 1, subpart F of this chapter contains the application filing procedures for the Wireless Telecommunications Services, including applications for new base, fixed, or mobile station authorizations governed by this part.
( b ) If the control station(s) will operate on the same frequency as the mobile station, and if the height of the control station(s) antenna(s) will not exceed 6.1 meters (20 feet) above ground or an existing man-made structure (other than an antenna structure), there is no limit on the number of such stations which may be authorized. Appropriate items on FCC Form 601 shall be completed showing the frequency, the station class, the total number of control stations, the emission, and the output power of the highest powered control station. Applicants in the 470-512 MHz band must furnish the relevant information for all control stations.
[63 FR 68963, Dec. 14, 1998]
Thanks Jeff,we have no comments

From: Jeff Hunt [ mailto:Hunt.Jeff@ epamail.epa.gov ]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 8:55 AM
To: Mary Basballe; Bill Sullivan
Cc: Debra Suzuki; Nancy Helm Subject: Fw: No comments on the Tacoma CDD

Hello Bill and Mary -- I just wanted to send this message as an FYI. We re ceive no comments on the proposed Clean Data Determination for the Tacoma , Pierce County nonattainment area that we discussed in May, so I plan to complete the final determination sometime this month. As always, if you have any ques tions please feel free to call me. Thanks .......... jh

(See attached file: OFR version_NPR_Tacoma_2006 PM2.5 CDD.pdf)

Jeff Hunt Office of Air, Waste and Toxics EPA Region 10, Mailstop AWT-107 1200 Sixth Ave, Suite 900 Seattle, WA 98101 (206) 553-0256 RE: No comments on the Tacoma CDD
Bill Sullivan

to: Jeff Hunt
08/07/2012 09:03 AM
Hide Details From: Bill Sullivan <bill.sullivan@puyalluptribe.com>

To: Jeff Hunt/R10/USEPA/US@EPA Page 1 of 1

8/10/2012 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\JHUNT02\Local Settin g s\Tem p \notesDF63F8\~web6273

...
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meting of the National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, September 11, 2006, 5 p.m. to September 13, 2006, 5 p.m. Doubletree Hotel Bethesda, 8120 Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda, MD, 20814 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on July 25, 2006, 71 FR 42099.                

The meeting notice is amended to reflect the change in hotel from the Doubletree Hotel, 8120 Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda, MD 20814 to the Clarion Hotel, 8400 Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda,  MD 20814. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: August 22, 2006.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 06-7228 Filed 8-29-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
§ 80.955 Radiotelephone installation. ( a ) Each U.S. flag vessel of less than 38 meters (124 feet) in length while subject to this subpart must have a radiotelephone meeting the provisions of this subpart in addition to the other rules in this part governing ship stations using telephony.
( b ) Each U.S. flag vessel of 38 meters (124 feet) or more in length while subject to this subpart must have a minimum of two VHF radiotelephone installations in operating condition meeting the provisions of this subpart. The second VHF installation must be electrically separate from the first VHF installation. However, both may be connected to the main power supply provided one installation can be operated from a separate power supply located as high as practicable on the vessel.
( c ) This paragraph does not require or prohibit the use of other frequencies for use by the same “radiotelephone installation” for communication authorized by this part.
#### §§ 95.2197-95.2999 [Reserved]
Exhibit 10.38


Summary of Unwritten Compensation
Arrangements

Applicable to Named Executive Officers of Overstock.com, Inc.


The
Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors of
Overstock.com, Inc. (the “Company”) oversees and reviews the Company’s
executive compensation policies and programs and approves the form and amount
of compensation to be paid to the Company’s executive officers.


Annual
Compensation—Base salaries, bonuses and stock option grants


The
Company is not a party to any written employment agreement with any of its
named executive officers.


The
Company pays each of its named executive officers (as defined in Item
402(a)(3) of Regulation S-K) base salaries at the annual rate of
$200,000, except for its President, Jason C. Lindsey, who is paid a base salary
of $300,000. The Company does not pay its Chief Executive Officer, Patrick M.
Byrne, any base salary.  Additionally,
the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company approved
stock option grants to named executive officers under the Company’s 2005 Equity
Incentive Plan


On February 7, 2007, the Committee approved bonus
payments to the named executive officers as a result of the officers’
performance in 2006 as follows:


	
  Name and Title

  	
   

  	
  Bonus

  	
   

  	
  2007 Salary

  	
   

  	
  Stock Option

  Grant (1)

  (shares)

  	
   

  
	
  Patrick M. Byrne, Chief
  Executive Officer (2)

  	
   

  	
  0

  	
   

  	
  0

  	
   

  	
  0

  	
   

  
	
  Jason Lindsey,
  President and Chief Operating Officer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  180,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  300,000

  	
   

  	
  80,000

  	
   

  
	
  Jonathan E. Johnson
  III, Senior Vice President, Corporate and Legal Affairs

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  120,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  200,000

  	
   

  	
  40,000

  	
   

  
	
  Stormy Simon, Senior
  Vice President, Branding and Customer Care

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  120,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  200,000

  	
   

  	
  40,000

  	
   

  
	
  David Chidester, Senior
  Vice President, Finance

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  120,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  200,000

  	
   

  	
  35,000

  	
   

  
	
  Stephen Tryon, Senior
  Vice President, Logistics

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  120,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  200,000

  	
   

  	
  35,000

  	
   

  
	
  Russell (Tad) Martin, Senior Vice President of Merchandising and
  Operations (3)

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  120,000

  	
   

  	
  0

  	
   

  	
  0

  	
   

  



 






(1)           Options vest as to
28% on the first anniversary of the grant and 2% each month thereafter and have
a ten-year term.


(2)           The Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, Dr. Patrick M. Byrne, declined to accept any bonus
payment relating to 2006, any salary for 2007, or any stock option grant.


(3)           As previously
reported, Mr. Martin resigned effective January 11, 2007.
No. 11-5772.

#### Montague *v.*Sexton, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 9, 2010

p0830 

# Order

September 9, 2010

140168(26)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140168 COA: 292380 Wayne CC: 02-008665-FC ANTONIO DUANE WARE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for rec onsideration of this Court’s June 28, 2010 order is considered, and it is DENIED, becau se it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.