alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4987 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4987

   To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in the 
 construction of the Orange County Regional Water Reclamation Project.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 18, 1994

Mr. Kim (for himself, Mr. Cox, Mr. Dornan, Mr. Packard, and Mr. Royce) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in the 
 construction of the Orange County Regional Water Reclamation Project.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Orange County Regional Water 
Reclamation Project Act of 1994''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO THE RECLAMATION PROJECTS AUTHORIZATION AND 
              ADJUSTMENT ACT OF 1992.

    Title XVI of the Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment 
Act of 1992 (43 U.S.C. 390h et seq.) is amended by adding the following 
section:

``SEC. 1618. ORANGE COUNTY REGIONAL WATER RECLAMATION PROJECT.

    ``(a) The Secretary is authorized to participate with the Orange 
County Water District in the State of California, and other appropriate 
authorities, in the planning, design and construction of water 
reclamation projects to treat up to 100,000 acre feet per year of 
wastewater effluent from the county of Orange, in order to provide new 
water supplies for ground water replenishment, industrial applications 
and other beneficial purposes, to reduce the demand for imported water, 
and to reduce sewage effluent discharged into the ocean near Huntington 
Beach.
    ``(b) The Secretary's share of costs associated with the project 
described in section (a) shall not exceed 25 percent of the total. The 
Secretary shall not provide funds for operation or maintenance of the 
project.
    ``(c) There are authorized to be appropriated not more than 
$60,000,000 to carry out this section, plus or minus such amounts, if 
any, as may be required by reason of changes in construction costs as 
indicated by engineering cost indexes applicable to the type of 
construction involved.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 76.984 Geographically uniform rate structure. ( a ) The rates charged by cable operators for basic service, cable programming service, and associated equipment and installation shall be provided pursuant to a rate structure that is uniform throughout each franchise area in which cable service is provided.
( b ) This section does not prohibit the establishment by cable operators of reasonable categories of service and customers with separate rates and terms and conditions of service, within a franchise area.
( c ) This section does not apply to: ( 1 ) A cable operator with respect to the provision of cable service over its cable system in any geographic area in which the video programming services offered by the operator in that area are subject to effective competition, or
( 2 ) Any video programming offered on a per channel or per program basis.
( 3 ) Bulk discounts to multiple dwelling units shall not be subject to this section, except that a cable operator of a cable system that is not subject to effective competition may not charge predatory prices to a multiple dwelling unit. Upon a prima facie showing by a complainant that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the discounted price is predatory, the cable system shall have the burden of showing that its discounted price is not predatory.
Note 1 to paragraph ( c
)(3):
Discovery procedures for predatory pricing complaints. Requests for discovery will be addressed pursuant to the procedures specified in § 76.7(f).
Note 2 to paragraph ( c
)(3):
Confidential information. Parties submitting material believed to be exempt from disclosure pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(b), and the Commission's rules, § 0.457 of this chapter, should follow the procedures in § 0.459 of this chapter and § 76.9.
[59 FR 17975, Apr. 15, 1994, as amended at 61 FR 18979, Apr. 30, 1996; 64 FR 35951, July 2, 1999]
Exhibit 10.d.76


    Exhibit
      10.d.76

    


    Officer
      Compensation Table

    


    In
      December 2006 the Compensation Committee approved a base salary adjustment
      for
      the CEO and recommended base salary increases ranging from three to five percent
      for five other officers of the Company, effective January 1, 2007. The Board
      of
      Directors approved the non-CEO officer base salary increases in December 2006,
      effective January 1, 2007. Officer salaries as of January 1, 2007 and short-term
      incentive bonuses paid for 2006 performance are as set forth below:

    


    


    
      	
               

              Name
                and Principal Position

            	
              2007

              Salary

            	
              2006
                Short-Term

              Incentive
                Bonuses

            
	
               

              Christopher
                L. Dutton

              President
                and Chief Executive

              Officer

            	
               

              $381,100

            	
               

              $0

            
	
              Mary
                G. Powell

              Senior
                Vice President and

              Chief
                Operating Officer

            	
              $278,100

            	
              $0

            
	
              Robert
                J. Griffin

              Vice
                President, Power Supply and Risk Management

            	
              $199,820

            	
              $0

            
	
              Donald
                J. Rendall, Jr.

              Vice
                President, General Counsel

              and
                Corporate Secretary

            	
              $197,760

            	
              $0

            
	
              Walter
                S. Oakes

              Vice
                President - Field Operations

            	
              $161,710

            	
              $0

            
	
              Dawn
                D. Bugbee

                  Vice
                President, Chief Financial

                  Officer
                & Treasurer

            	
              $183,750

            	
              $0
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5059

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade for the vessel FINESSE.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 19, 1994

Mr. GOSS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

FINESSE.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

4 Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the Act of June 19, 1886

5 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106 of title 46,

6 United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may

7 issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate en8 dorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the
2

•HR 5059 IH

1 vessel FINESSE (State of Florida official number 7148

2 HA).

Æ
EXHIBIT 10.28


DESCRIPTION
OF OUTSIDE DIRECTOR FEE ARRANGEMENTS


          Directors
who are not executive officers of the Company or the Bank (“Outside Directors”)
receive an annual retainer of $30,000 from the Bank, with no additional
retainer from the Company. The Chair of the Audit Committee receives an
additional annual retainer of $10,000 and the Chair of the Compensation
Committee receives an additional annual retainer of $5,000. Outside Directors
also receive meeting fees of $1,500 for each Board or Bank Board meeting attended,
$1,000 for each Audit Committee or Compensation Committee attended, and $750
for each other committee meeting attended, whether or not they are members of
such committee. However, where the Board of Directors and the Bank Board meet
on the same day, directors receive only a single board meeting fee for such
meetings. Similarly, directors receive only a single committee meeting fee
where identically constituted committees of the Board of Directors and Bank
Board meet on the same day. 


          Outside
Directors who are members of the Loan Committee also receive a fee from the
Bank for conducting on-site inspections of proposed real estate collateral for
certain loans in excess of $1,500,000 and certain other loans in excess of
$750,000. For each day that a director conducts such inspections, the director
receives a fee of $400 for the first property inspected and $200 for each
additional property inspected on that day.


113
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5065

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 30 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Received

AN ACT

To amend the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development

Act to make technical corrections to certain provisions

relating to beginning farmers and ranchers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Beginning Farmer

5 Technical Corrections Act of 1994’’.
2

•HR 5065 RDS

1 SEC. 2. LAND OWNERSHIP LIMITATION MADE INAPPLICA2 BLE TO OPERATING LOANS.

3 Section 343(a)(11) of the Consolidated Farm and

4 Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C. 1991(a)(11)) is amend5 ed by adding after and below the end the following:

6 ‘‘As used in subtitle B, the term ‘qualified beginning

7 farmer or rancher’ shall have the meaning given in

8 the preceding sentence without regard to subpara9 graph (F).’’.

10 SEC. 3. GRADUATION OF BORROWERS WITHOUT REGARD

11 TO YOUTH LOANS.

12 Section 319 of the Consolidated Farm and Rural De13 velopment Act (7 U.S.C. 1949) is amended by adding at

14 the end the following:

15 ‘‘(c) DISREGARD OF LOANS MADE TO YOUTHS.—As

16 used in this section, the term ‘loan’ does not include any

17 loan made under section 311(b).’’.

18 SEC. 4. DIRECT LOAN HISTORY AND GUARANTEE HISTORY

19 TO BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY IN APPLY20 ING THE TRANSITION RULE FOR GRADUA21 TION OF BORROWERS.

22 Section 319(b)(2) of the Consolidated Farm and

23 Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C. 1949(b)(2)) is amended

24 to read as follows:

25 ‘‘(2) TRANSITION RULES.—
3

•HR 5065 RDS

1 ‘‘(A) CONSIDERATION OF DIRECT LOAN

2 HISTORY.—If, as of October 28, 1992, the Sec3 retary has, for 5 or more years, made a direct

4 loan to a borrower under this subtitle, then,

5 after the 5th year (occurring after October 28,

6 1992) for which a direct loan has been made to

7 the borrower under this subtitle, the Secretary

8 shall not make a direct loan to the borrower

9 under this subtitle.

10 ‘‘(B) CONSIDERATION OF GUARANTEE HIS11 TORY.—If, as of October 28, 1992, the Sec12 retary has, for 10 or more years, provided a

13 guarantee under this subtitle with respect to a

14 loan made to a borrower, then, after the 5th

15 year (occurring after October 28, 1992) for

16 which a guarantee has been provided under this

17 subtitle with respect to a loan made to the bor18 rower, the Secretary shall not provide a guaran19 tee under this subtitle with respect to a loan

20 made to the borrower.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives, September 29,

1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
§ 90.663 MTA-based SMR system operations. ( a ) MTA-based licensees authorized in the 896-901/935-940 MHz band pursuant to § 90.661 may construct and operate base stations using any frequency identified in their spectrum block anywhere within their authorized MTA, provided that: ( 1 ) The MTA licensee affords protection, in accordance with § 90.621(b), to all sites for which applications were filed on or prior to August 9, 1994.
( 2 ) The MTA licensee complies with any rules and international agreements that restrict use of frequencies identified in their spectrum block, including the provisions of § 90.619 relating to U.S./Canadian and U.S./Mexican border areas.
( 3 ) The MTA licensee limits its field strength at any location on the border of the MTA service area in accordance with § 90.671 and masks its emissions in accordance with § 90.669.
( b ) In the event that the authorization for a previously authorized co-channel station within the MTA licensee's authorized spectrum block is terminated or revoked, the MTA licensee's co-channel obligations to such station will cease upon deletion of the facility from the Commission's licensing record. The MTA licensee then will be able to construct and operate base stations using such frequency.
[60 FR 21991, May 4, 1995]
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 174 (Friday, September 8, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53094-53095]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7581]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice; Announcing a Partially Open Meeting 
of the Board of Directors

Time and Date: The open meeting of the Board of Directors is scheduled 
to begin at 10 a.m. on Wednesday, September 13, 2006. The closed 
portion of the meeting will follow immediately the open portion of the 
meeting.

Place: Board Room, First Floor, Federal Housing Finance Board, 1625 Eye 
Street NW., Washington, DC 20006.

Status: The first portion of the meeting will be open to the public. 
The final portion of the meeting will be closed to the public.

Matters to be Considered at the Open Portion: Fiscal Year 2007 Agency

[[Page 53095]]

Budget. Strategic Plan and Annual Performance Budget. Proposed Bank 
Examination Rating System. Final Rule: Affordable Housing Program 
Amendments.

Matter to be Considered at the Closed Portion: Periodic Update of 
Examination Program Development and Supervisory Findings.

Contact Person for More Information: Shelia Willis, Paralegal 
Specialist, Office of General Counsel, at 202-408-2876 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#57203e3b3b3e242417313f313579303821"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="64130d08080d171724020c02064a030b12">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 6, 2006.

    By the Federal Housing Finance Board.
John P. Kennedy,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 06-7581 Filed 9-06-06; 2:54 pm]
BILLING CODE 6725-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### DUPLEX MILL & MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Springfield, Ohio, Appellant, v. B. J. GROSS, dba Gross Feed Store, Bonham, Texas, Appellee.

No. 11219.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 9, 1951.

John M. Cole, Fred M. Cole, and George W. Cole, all of Springfield, Ohio, for appellant.

Buster Cole, Bonham, Tex., Corry, Dur-fey, Martin & Browne, and Bitner Browne, all of Springfield, Ohio, for appellee.

Before SIMONS, MARTIN and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was heard on the record, briefs and argument of counsel for respective parties;

And it appearing that there was substantial evidence on behalf of the appel-lee ot the cost of 19,798 bushels of ear corn, purchased and then resold by him without shelling by reason of appellant’s breach of contract, namely $1.95 per bushel, and the cost to appellee of 15 cents per bushel to shell corn so purchased, and a firm unlimited market sales price of $2.40 per bushel for com so shelled by him, resulting in a loss of profits in the amount of $5,939.40 resulting from the failure of appellant to deliver the corn sheller purchased by appellee; and also substantial evidence on his behalf of his ability to have purchased, shelled and marketed on the same basis additional corn to utilize the full capacity of the sheller; and also substantial evidence of loss or damage to the good will of appellee’s business;

And such lost profits appearing to have been within the contemplation of the parties when the contract was made as the probable result of its breach, and having been shown with a reasonable degree of certainty from the evidence; The Cincinnati Siemens Lungren Gas Illuminating Co. v. The Western Siemens-Lungren Co., 152 U.S. 200, 14 S.Ct. 523, 38 L.Ed. 411, Jaynes v. Vetel, Ohio App., 80 N.E.2d 621; Queen Incubator Co. v. Merrell Co., 21 Ohio App. 482, 153 N.E. 272;

And it further appearing that there was no error in the charge of the Court to the jury on said issues;

It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 22, 2022

No. 04-22-00390-CV

Brian GILL,

Appellant

v.

Gina GILL,

Appellee

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020-CI-23530

Honorable Tina Torres, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The district court signed a final judgment on May 26, 2022; the reporter’s record was due 

to be filed in this court by July 25, 2022. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.1. No reporter’s record has 

been filed. It appears that none has been requested. Contra id. R. 35.3(b)(2)

Therefore, we order Appellant to provide written proof to this court within ten days of 

the date of this order that the reporter’s record has been requested and paid for or arrangements 

have been made to pay the reporter’s fee (unless Appellant is entitled to appeal without paying 

the reporter’s fee). See id. R. 35.3(b)(2), (3). If Appellant fails to respond within the time 

provided, Appellant must file his brief with this court within thirty days of the date of this order, 

and the court will only “consider and decide those issues or points [raised in Appellant’s brief] 

that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c).

If Appellant timely complies with this order, the reporter’s record will be due fifteen days 

from the date Appellant files written proof showing compliance with this order.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

FILE COPY
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of August, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
§ 90.185 Multiple licensing of radio transmitting equipment in the mobile radio service. Two or more persons eligible for licensing under this rule part may be licensed for the same land station under the following terms and conditions. ( a ) Each licensee complies with the general operating requirements set out in § 90.403 of the rules.
( b ) Each licensee is eligible for the frequency(ies) on which the land station operates.
( c ) If the multiple licensed base station is interconnected with the public switched telephone network, the provisions of § 90.477 *et seq.* apply.
[48 FR 26621, June 9, 1983]
Case 16-25207 Doc 55 Filed 11/06/17 Entered 11/07/17 11:37:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-25207 Doc 55 Filed 11/06/17 Entered 11/07/17 11:37:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)I, Randy K. Ferrell, as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Fauquier Bankshares, Inc.,certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended September 30, 2007, which accompanies this certification fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information containedin the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of Fauquier Bankshares, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. Theforegoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaims anyobligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.     Dated: November 12, 2007    /s/ Randy K. Ferrell    Randy K. Ferrell
**Exhibit 31.2**          **CERTIFICATIONS**     I, Eric P. Graap, certify that:          1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fauquier Bankshares, Inc.;          2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;          3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;          4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and          5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date: May 12, 2006 /s/ Eric P. Graap   Eric P. Graap   Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer