alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### LEWIS AND GEORGIA DICKERMAN v. VT. MUT. FIRE INS. CO. SAME v. UNION MUTUAL FIRE INS. CO.

October Term, 1894.

*Fire insurance. Allegation of insurable interest.*

1. A declaration upon a policy of fire insurance must allege an insurable interest in the plaintiff both at the time of the issuing of the policy and the happening of the loss.

2. *Quere,*Whether this declaration sufficiently alleges that the loss was payable before the suit was begun.

Assumpsit upon a policy of fire insurance. Heard upon demurrer, at the May term, 1894, Washington county, Thompson, J., presiding. Demurrer overruled and declaration adjudged sufficient. The defendant excepts. ' Exceptions passed to supreme court before trial.

*100*Senter & Kemp*and *Dillingham, Huse & Howland*for the defendant.

c The declaration must aver an insurable interest. *£>it,arrier*v. *Peabody Life Ins. Co.,*10 W. Va. 507 ; *Royal Ins. Co.*v. *Horton,*14 Ins. *L. J.*871 (Ky.) ; *Phoenix Ins. Co.*v. *Benton,*87 Ind. 132; *Home Ins. Co.*v. *Duke,*75 Ind. 535 ; *PEtna Ins. Co.*v. *Kettles,*81 Ind. 96.

There is no allegation that proofs of loss have been made, and therefore it does not appear that the money is due. 2 Wood, Fire Ins., 1137 *et*seq.; *Donahue*v. *Windsor Co. Mut. Ins. Co.,*56 Vt. 374.

*D. C. Denison & Son*and *W. E. Johnson*for the plaintiff. ■

The count is sufficient. *Tripp & Bailey*v. *Vt. L. Ins. Co.,*55 Vt. 100.

ROWELL, J.

The question in these cases being the same, they were heard together.

The statement in the counts demurred to, that the policies and applications are referred to and made a part thereof, does not, as is conceded, make those instruments a part of the counts.

It is essential to the sufficiency of the counts that they should allege an insurable interest in the plaintiffs at the time the policies were issued and also at the time of loss.

In respect to the time of issuing the policies, it is alleged that the defendants promised the plaintiffs to pay them certain sums of money named if *their*buildings, situate, etc., were destroyed by fire between certain dates. It is doubtful whether this is a sufficiently definite and positive allegation of insurable interest. The authorities differ about it, and it is not necessary to decide the question, for the counts are *101bad for not alleging such interest at the time of loss, concerning which they contain no allegation whatever.

It is also doubtful, to say the least, whether it appears from either count that the money was due and payable when the suits were commenced. It is true that the promises as laid are, to pay if the buildings were destroyed, but it is not alleged that payment was to be made on the happening of that event, nor on notice of its happening, nor within a reasonable or other time thereafter, and one of the counts alleges no notice. But it is unnecessary to consider this point further, as the pleader can easily obviate this objection when he repleads.

*Judgment reversed, demurrers sustained, the counts adjudged insufficient, and causes remanded.*

Taft, J., being a member of one of the companies, did not sit.
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P337A Prosecutor's Stand: A Guide for Community ScreeningsThis guide is designed to help community stakeholders facilitate discussions and training sessions in conjunction with screenings of the 24-minute Not In Our Town film A Prosecutor's Stand. Produced in collaboration with the COPS Office, the film examines recent hate crimes in San Francisco, California, and explores the nature of these crimes, trauma faced by victims, and common challenges in investigating and prosecuting these cases. Interviews with prosecutors, the district attorney, victims, victim liaisons, and others demonstrate the important interplay between hate crime victims, law enforcement, and the greater community. The guide provides discussion questions for use in internal agency trainings and community screenings, as well as a hate crimes fact sheet and a list of supplemental resources. Used together, the film and guide can help agencies work to prevent hate crimes, improve hate crime reporting, enhance investigations and prosecutions, and support victims.By Paul Sheridan, Libby McInerny, Michelle Gahee KlossCategories: Community PartnershipsLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p337Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFBook • Oct 2015Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 02:21 (UTC-5) in 0.20 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS E ASTLAND , T EXAS J UDGMENT

Randy Virgil Echols , * From the 220 th District Court of Comanche County, Trial Court No. CR

- 03450

. Vs. No. 11

- 12

- 00149

- CR * August 22, 2013

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Willson , J

. (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., McCall, J., and Willson , J.) This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion, w e modify the trial court’s judgment to re flect that the amount of court costs is $505. As modified, we affirm.
#### § 216.84 [Reserved]
Editorial Note on Part 11
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 11 appear at 67 FR 38208, June 3, 2002.

§ 11.2 Scope of regulations. The regulations contained in this part apply only to actions arising under the following laws and regulations issued thereunder: ( a ) Lacey Act, 18 U.S.C. 42-43;
( b ) Lacey Act Amendments of 1981, 16 U.S.C. 3371 *et seq.;*
( c ) Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, 16 U.S.C. 668-668d;
( d ) Endangered Species Act of 1973, 16 U.S.C. 1531 *et seq.;*
( e ) Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, 16 U.S.C. 1361 *et seq.;*
( f ) African Elephant Conservation Act, 16 U.S.C. 4201 *et seq.;*
( g ) Rhinoceros and Tiger Conservation Act, 16 U.S.C. 5301 *et seq.;*
( h ) Archaeological Resources Protection Act, 16 U.S.C. 470aa *et seq.;*
( i ) Paleontological Resources Protection Act, 16 U.S.C. 470aaa *et seq.;*
( j ) The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, 25 U.S.C. 3001 *et seq.;*
( k ) Recreational Hunting Safety Act of 1994, 16 U.S.C. 5201 *et seq.;* and
( l ) Wild Bird Conservation Act, 16 U.S.C. 4901 *et seq.*
[81 FR 41865, June 28, 2016]
**Read more of the May Dispatch**
    - May Photo Contest Winner: A Four-Legged Law Enforcement Pro Brings Kids, Cops, and the Community Closer in San Mateo
    - COPS Office CRI-TAC Continuing to Respond to COVID-19 Pandemic
    - How a Consumer LPR Company, Homeowners, and Police Reduced Crime in Cobb County
    - Albany Police Department Increases Public Safety with the LEAD Program
    - Serving the Needs of the Older Adult Community: Ways to Handle Elder Abuse Calls
    - New Resources at Discover Policing
    - How *The Law and Your Community*Helped Change My Community-Police Relationship
    - Doorbell Camera Surveillance Networks: Community Collaboration to Solve Crime
    - Director’s Corner: Enhancing Community Engagement and Investigative Capabilities with Technology
Exhibit 10.8


Named Executive Officer Salary and Bonus Arrangements for 2007


             Base Salaries


             The base salaries for 2007 for the following executive officers of Great Southern Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") and Great Southern Bank (the "Bank") are as follows:


	Name and Title
	Base Salary

	
	William V. Turner	$216,667(1)
	Chairman of the Board of
	 the Company and the Bank
	 
	Joseph W. Turner	$228,800 
	President and Chief
	 Executive Officer of the 
	 Company and the Bank
	 
	Rex A. Copeland	$173,040
	Treasurer of the Company 
	 and Senior Vice President and
	 Chief Financial Officer of the Bank
	 
	Steven G. Mitchem 	$174,688
	Senior Vice President and Chief
	Lending Officer of the Bank
	 
	Douglas W. Marrs	$103,175
	Vice President -- Operations of the Bank



______________

(1) During 2007, William V. Turner will receive payments of salary previously deferred totaling approximately $16,667.


             Description of Bonus Arrangements


             For 2007, William V. Turner waived his right (as he did in 2006) to receive the annual cash bonus provided for in his employment
agreement (one-half of one percent of the Company's pre-tax net income).  For 2007 (as it was in 2006), the annual cash bonus payable to
Joseph W. Turner under his employment agreement will be three-fourths of one percent of the Company's pre-tax net income.  For 2007, as
for 2006, each of Messrs. Copeland, Mitchem and Marrs, along with the other executive officers of the Company and the Bank, will be
eligible for a cash bonus of up to 15% of base annual salary, with one half of this possible bonus payable if the Company achieves targeted
growth in earnings per share for 2007 and one-half of the possible bonus awarded based on individual performance in 2007.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Apollo Medical Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on 10-Q/A for the quarter   ended April 30, 2011 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Warren Hosseinion, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The foregoing certification
is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section  1350 and is not being filed for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.



|Date:  April 9, 2012 | By: | Warren Hosseinion      
|-------------------- | --- | -----------------------
|                     |     |                        
|                     |     | Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.45


                           CRITICAL THERAPEUTICS, INC.

             2007 MAXIMUM ANNUAL CASH BONUSES FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

         On December 19, 2006, based on the recommendation of the Compensation
Committee, the independent directors of the Board of Directors established
maximum annual cash bonuses for executive officers for 2007. The maximum annual
cash bonus for 2007, as a percentage of 2007 annual base salary, for each
executive officer is as follows:




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                  2007 MAXIMUM
NAME                          POSITION                                                          ANNUAL CASH BONUS
--------------------------    ------------------------------------------------------------      -----------------

<S>                           <C>                                                               <C>
Frank E. Thomas               President and Chief Executive Officer                                   40%

Trevor Phillips, Ph.D.        Senior Vice President of Operations and Chief Operating
                              Officer                                                                 35%

Dana Hilt, M.D.               Senior Vice President of Clinical Development and Chief
                              Medical Officer                                                         30%

Scott B. Townsend, Esq.       Vice President of Legal Affairs, General Counsel and
                              Secretary                                                               30%

Jeffrey E. Young              Vice President of Finance, Chief Accounting Officer and
                              Treasurer                                                               30%
</TABLE>




         The Compensation Committee may make actual cash bonus awards that may
be greater or less than the annual maximum cash bonus based on overall corporate
performance and individual performance. None of the executive officers is
guaranteed any annual cash bonus.
§ 52.11 North American Numbering Council. The duties of the North American Numbering Council (NANC), may include, but are not limited to: ( a ) Advising the Commission on policy matters relating to the administration of the NANP in the United States;
( b ) Making recommendations, reached through consensus, that foster efficient and impartial number administration;
( c ) Initially resolving disputes, through consensus, that foster efficient and impartial number administration in the United States by adopting and utilizing dispute resolution procedures that provide disputants, regulators, and the public notice of the matters at issue, a reasonable opportunity to make oral and written presentations, a reasoned recommended solution, and a written report summarizing the recommendation and the reasons therefore;
( d ) [Reserved]
( e ) Recommending to the Commission an appropriate mechanism for recovering the costs of NANP administration in the United States, consistent with § 52.17;
( f ) Carrying out the duties described in § 52.25; and
( g ) Carrying out this part as directed by the Commission;
( h ) Monitoring the performance of the NANPA and the B&C Agent on at least an annual basis; and
( i ) Implementing, at the direction of the Commission, any action necessary to correct identified problems with the performance of the NANPA and the B&C Agent, as deemed necessary.
[61 FR 47353, Sept. 6, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 55180, Oct. 23, 1997; 71 FR 65750, Nov. 9, 2006]
#### § 95.2763 MURS channels.

Five VHF channels are allotted for shared use in the MURS. These channels, designated by their center frequencies in megahertz, are as follows: 151.820, 151.880, 151.940, 154.570, and 154.600 MHz. Each MURS transmitter type must be designed to transmit on one or more of these channels.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

In re: 

James R Turner

Debtor(s)

Case No. 16-23808

CHAPTER 13 STANDING TRUSTEE’S FINAL REPORT AND ACCOUNT

Glenn Stearns, chapter 13 trustee, submits the following Final Report and Account of the 

administration of the estate pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1302(b)(1). The trustee declares as follows:

1) The case was filed on 07/25/2016.

2) The plan was confirmed on NA .

3) The plan was modified by order after confirmation pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1329 on

NA .

4) The trustee filed action to remedy default by the debtor in performance under the plan 

on NA .

5) The case was dismissed on 08/19/2016.

6) Number of months from filing to last payment: 0.

7) Number of months case was pending: 3.

8) Total value of assets abandoned by court order: NA .

9) Total value of assets exempted: NA .

10) Amount of unsecured claims discharged without payment: $0.00.

11) All checks distributed by the trustee relating to this case have cleared the bank.

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (9/1/2009)

Case 16-23808 Doc 16 Filed 10/27/16 Entered 10/27/16 09:29:05 Desc Page 1

 of 3
Receipts:

Total paid by or on behalf of the debtor $0.00

Less amount refunded to debtor $0.00

NET RECEIPTS: $0.00

Expenses of Administration:

Attorney’s Fees Paid Through the Plan $0.00

Court Costs $0.00

Trustee Expenses & Compensation $0.00

Other $0.00

TOTAL EXPENSES OF ADMINISTRATION: $0.00

Attorney fees paid and disclosed by debtor: $0.00

Scheduled Creditors:

Creditor

Name Class

Claim

Scheduled

Claim

Asserted

Claim

Allowed

Int.

Paid

Principal

Paid

Summary of Disbursements to Creditors:

Secured Payments:

Mortgage Ongoing

Mortgage Arrearage

Debt Secured by Vehicle

All Other Secured

TOTAL SECURED:

Priority Unsecured Payments:

Domestic Support Arrearage

Domestic Support Ongoing

All Other Priority

TOTAL PRIORITY:

GENERAL UNSECURED PAYMENTS:

Claim

Allowed

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Principal

Paid

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Interest

Paid

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (9/1/2009)

Case 16-23808 Doc 16 Filed 10/27/16 Entered 10/27/16 09:29:05 Desc Page 2

 of 3
Disbursements:

Expenses of Administration $0.00

Disbursements to Creditors $0.00

TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS : $0.00

12) The trustee certifies that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 5009, 

the estate has been fully administered, the foregoing summary is true and complete, and all 

administrative matters for which the trustee is responsible have been completed. The trustee 

requests a final decree be entered that discharges the trustee and grants such other relief as may 

be just and proper.

Dated: 10/26/2016

STATEMENT: This Unified Form is associated with an open bankruptcy case, therefore, Paperwork Reduction 

Act exemption 5 C.F.R. § 1320.4(a)(2) applies.

By:/s/ Glenn Stearns

Trustee

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (9/1/2009)

Case 16-23808 Doc 16 Filed 10/27/16 Entered 10/27/16 09:29:05 Desc Page 3

 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 171 (Tuesday, September 5, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 52344]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7450]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-06-053]


Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting; Rescheduling of 
Government in the Sunshine Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting:  United States International Trade 
Commission.

Original Date and Time:  September 1, 2006 at 9:30 a.m.

New Date and Time:  September 6, 2006 at 1 p.m.

Place:  Room 101, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

Status: Open to the public.
    In accordance with 19 CFR 201.35(d)(1), the Commission has 
determined to change the day and time for the meeting of September 1, 
2006 at 9:30 a.m. to September 6, 2006 at 1 p.m. All agenda items 
remain the same. Earlier notice of this change was not possible.

    Issued: August 31, 2006.

    By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 06-7450 Filed 8-31-06; 2:29 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-M
§ 80.925 Electric light. ( a ) If the vessel is navigated at night an electric light or dial lights which clearly illuminate the operating controls must be installed to provide illumination of the operating controls at the principal operating position.
( b ) The electric light must be energized from the main power supply and, if a reserve power supply for the radiotelephone installation is required, from the reserve power supply.
.-- f -

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC

TRAVEL GROUP, INC., D/B/A REPUBLIC AIR TRAVEL AND SCOT SPENCER AIRLIFT GROUP, INC. AND RICHARD BERNARD DOT -OST -1995-272 formerly Docket 49233 Unauthorized Air Transportation, Unfair and Deceptive Practices and Unfair Methods of Competition, and Violations of Public Charter Rules EXPRESS ONE INTERNATIONAL, INC. Unfair and Deceptive Practices and Unfair Methods of Competition, and Violations of Public Charter Rules Enforcement Proceeding

STATUS REPORT
The Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings ("Enforcement Office"), pursuant to Your Honor's March 22, 2006, Order staying this proceeding, files this report detailing the current status of this proceeding and settlement negotiations. The Department has not ruled on the outstanding motions filed by Respondents and opposed by the Enforcement Office in Ascend Aviation Group, Docket OST-2004- 17486.2 There have been no further settlement discussions. Date: April 30, 2014

Vinh Q. Nguyen Senior Trial Attorney United States Department of Transportation Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Room 96-429 Washington, D.C. 20590 TEL: 202-366-9342 FAX: 202-366-7152

-- ~~--~3 Docket No. DOT-OST-1995-272 I hereby certify that on this 30th day of April, 2014, a true and correct copy ofthe foregoing Status Report was served in the following manner to the following: Original U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations, M-30 West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 By First Class Mail The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder Chief Administrative Law Judge Office of Hearings, M-20 U.S. Department of Transportation Washington, D.C. 20590 TEL: (202) 366-2142 FAX: (202) 366-7536 By First Class Mail Scot Spencer SBD Aircraft Services 255 S Leland Norton Way Sam Bernardino, CA 92408 Scot Spencer 22604 Esplanada Circle Boca Raton, Florida 33433
Case 16-24638    Doc 1    Filed 08/01/16    Entered 08/01/16 06:44:42    Desc Main Document      Page 1 of 8

Case 16-24638    Doc 1    Filed 08/01/16    Entered 08/01/16 06:44:42    Desc Main Document      Page 2 of 8

Case 16-24638    Doc 1    Filed 08/01/16    Entered 08/01/16 06:44:42    Desc Main Document      Page 3 of 8

Case 16-24638    Doc 1    Filed 08/01/16    Entered 08/01/16 06:44:42    Desc Main Document      Page 4 of 8

Case 16-24638    Doc 1    Filed 08/01/16    Entered 08/01/16 06:44:42    Desc Main Document      Page 5 of 8

Case 16-24638    Doc 1    Filed 08/01/16    Entered 08/01/16 06:44:42    Desc Main Document      Page 6 of 8

Case 16-24638    Doc 1    Filed 08/01/16    Entered 08/01/16 06:44:42    Desc Main Document      Page 7 of 8

Case 16-24638    Doc 1    Filed 08/01/16    Entered 08/01/16 06:44:42    Desc Main Document      Page 8 of 8
No. 11-5605.

#### Jack *v.*Navy Federal Credit Union.

Sup. Ct. Va. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-5512.

#### Roberts v. United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.