alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 21.100 Depredation permits. ( a ) *Permit requirement.* Except as provided in §§ 21.150, 21.153, and 21.156, a depredation permit is required before any person may take, possess, or transport migratory birds for depredation control purposes. No permit is required merely to scare or herd depredating migratory birds other than endangered or threatened species or bald or golden eagles.
( b ) *Application procedures.* Submit application for depredation permits to the appropriate Regional Director (Attention: Migratory bird permit office). You can find addresses for the Regional Directors in 50 CFR 2.2. Each application must contain the general information and certification required in § 13.12(a) of this subchapter, and the following additional information: ( 1 ) A description of the area where depredations are occurring;
( 2 ) The nature of the crops or other interests being injured;
( 3 ) The extent of such injury; and
( 4 ) The particular species of migratory birds committing the injury.
( c ) *Additional permit conditions.* In addition to the general conditions set forth in part 13 of this subchapter B, depredation permits shall be subject to requires, in this section: ( 1 ) Permittees may not kill migratory birds unless specifically authorized on the permit.
( 2 ) Unless otherwise specifically authorized, when permittees are authorized to kill migratory birds they may do so only with a shotgun not larger than No. 10 gauge fired from the shoulder, and only on or over the threatened area or area described on the permit.
( 3 ) Permittees may not use blinds, pits, or other means of concealment, decoys, duck calls, or other devices to lure or entice birds within gun range.
( 4 ) All migratory birds killed shall be retrieved by the permittee and turned over to a Bureau representative or his designee for disposition to charitable or other worthy institutions for use as food, or otherwise disposed of as provided by law.
( 5 ) Only persons named on the permit are authorized to act as agents of the permittee under authority of the permit.
( d ) *Tenure of permits.* The tenure of depredation permits shall be limited to the dates which appear on its face, but in no case shall be longer than one year.
[39 FR 1178, Jan. 4, 1974, as amended at 42 FR 17122, Mar. 31, 1977; 63 FR 52637, Oct. 1, 1998; 80 FR 15691, Mar. 25, 2015. Redesignated and amended at 87 FR 882, Jan. 7, 2022]
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 169 (Thursday, August 31, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 51891]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7351]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 4 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, Tennessee, and 
Wisconsin)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 4 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted (via teleconference). The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is 
soliciting public comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer 
service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, September 26, 2006, at 11 
a.m., Central Time.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Ann Delzer at 1-888-912-1227, or 
(414) 231-2360.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Area 4 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Tuesday, September 26, 2006, at 11 a.m., Central Time via a telephone 
conference call. You can submit written comments to the panel by faxing 
the comments to (414) 231-2363, or by mail to Taxpayer Advocacy Panel, 
Stop 1006MIL, 211 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221, or 
you can contact us at http://www.improveirs.org. This meeting is not 
required to be open to the public, but because we are always interested 
in community input we will accept public comments. Please contact Mary 
Ann Delzer at 1-888-912-1227 or (414) 231-2360 for dial-in information.
    The agenda will include the following: Various IRS issues.

    Dated: August 23, 2006.
John Fay,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 06-7351 Filed 8-30-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
No. 11-5782.

#### Slade *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
##### U.S. Geological Survey     Open-File Report 03-58

## Alaska Resource   Data File, Hughes quadrangle, Alaska

#### *By*****Joe Britton

Download this 60-page   report as a PDF document (308 KB)

There is a website   from which you can obtain the data for this report in text and Filemaker   Pro formats 

For questions about the   content of this report, contact Ric Wilson.

Download a current version   of Acrobat Reader   for free

| Help   | PDF help   | Geopubs main page | Open-File   Reports for 2003 |

|   Privacy Statement | Disclaimer   | Accessibility |

|   Geologic Division | Alaska   Minerals |

This report   is also available from

Anchorage   Earth Science Information Center  4230   University Drive, Rm. 101   Anchorage, Alaska 99508-4664   Phone: 907-786-7011   FAX: 907-786-7050 

----

Department of the Interior
U.S. Geological Survey
Carolyn Donlin
274P15

#### Robert K. Stewart v. Maureen H. Krueger and Peter B. Strickland

1. Petitioner’s *Pro Se*Motion for Complaint Obstructing Justice

1. Dismissed

2. Petitioner’s *Pro Se*Motion to Proceed *In Forma Pauperis*

2. Allowed

3. Petitioner’s *Pro Se*Motion to Appoint Counsel

3. Dismissed as moot
#### § 9.26 Advisory committee participation.

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any State or taxing jurisdiction identified by the Commission in the report required under section 6(f)(2) of the Wireless Communications and Public Safety Act of 1999, as amended (47 U.S.C. 615a-1(f)(2)), as engaging in diversion of 911 fees or charges shall be ineligible to participate or send a representative to serve on any advisory committee established by the Commission.
#### § 14.23 Live farm-raised fish and farm-raised fish eggs.

Live farm-raised fish and farm-raised fish eggs meet the definition of “bred in captivity” as stated in 50 CFR 17.3. Except for wildlife requiring a permit pursuant to parts 17 or 23 of this subchapter, live farm-raised fish and farm-raised fish eggs may be exported from any U.S. Customs port.

[59 FR 41714, Aug. 15, 1994]
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Ding Rencai,certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of China Water Group, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c.

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; 

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: September 9, 2015

/s/ Ding Rencai

     Ding Rencai

     Chief Financial Officer
#### § 80.876 VHF radiotelephone antenna system.

A vertically polarized nondirectional antenna must be provided for VHF radiotelephone installations. The construction and installation of this antenna must insure proper operation in an emergency.
DISMSS and Opinion Filed July 9, 2015.

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 14

- 01404

- CV

NASROLLAH JAFARZADEH AND IDA ENGINEERING, INC. , Appellants

V.

MONIREH MAJD RAVANBA KSHS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 366

- 53521

- 2012



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Fillmore, Myers, and Evans Opinion by Justice Evans

Before the Court is appel lee’s June 23, 2015 motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellee

contends the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution because appellants have failed

to file their briefs that are over two months past due . Appellants did not file a response to the

mo tion to dismiss or otherwise communicate with the Court and have not filed a brief

.

Accordingly, we grant appellee’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(b ).

141404F.P05 / David Evans/

DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE– 2

– 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

NASROLLAH JAFARZADEH AND IDA ENGINEERING, INC., Appellants

No. 05

- 14

- 01404

- CV V.

MONIREH MAJD RAVANBAKSHS, Appellee On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas.

Tr ial Court Cause No. 366

- 53521

- 2012. Opinion delivered by Justice Evans. Justices Fillmore and Myers, participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

.

It is ORDERED that appellee MONIREH MAJD RAVANBAKSHS r ecover her costs of this appeal from appellants NASROLLAH JAFARZADEH AND IDA ENGINEERING, INC..

Judgment entered this 9th day of July, 2015.
First Step:

We determined the compliance rate at each EL:

Family Equipment Class EL1

Panel 8%

Centrifugal Unhoused 1%

Power Roof Ventilator 22%

Axial Housed 7%

Centrifugal Housed 8%

Inline and Mixed Flow 21%

Radial 10%

Second Step

Because the mix of Equipment Classes in the LCC sample does not match the mix in the US maket, the data was adjusted usin

The results provided by Wade Smith derived using the AMCA sample, are comparable to the results derived from the LCC sam

Unducted LCC sample weights US market weights*

Panel 23% 52.76%

Centrifugal Unhoused 17% 23.17%

Power Roof Ventilator 60% 24.06%

Total 100% 100%

Ducted LCC sample weights US market weights*

Axial Housed 13.6% 18%

Centrifugal Housed 41.9% 48%

Inline and Mixed Flow 24.5% 14%

Radial 20.0% 20%

Total 100.0% 100.0%

Scenario Family EL1**

Unducted 15%

Ducted 11%

Unducted 10%

Ducted 10%

Unducted N/A

Ducted N/A

** Targets used for each EL:

Family EL1 EL2

Unducted 54% 58%

Ducted 58% 62%

We used the LCC sample which corresponds to the AMCA data filtered down to 109,755 sales. This dataset is similar to what 

Unducted

Ducted

LCC Sample (no US market Adjustment)

Adjusted to US market (June 4 Power Point)

AMCA Sample
Summary

Using a similar table than sent by Wade on June 5, and only comparing the LCC sample to the AMCA sample:

Unducted Fans - Target Efficiency DOE LCC Sample AMCA Sample

58% 21% 25%

62% 26% 30%

66% 34% 38%

Ducted Fans - Target Efficiency DOE LCC Sample AMCA Sample

62% 15% 15%

66% 22% 21%

70% 28% 28%
EL2 EL3 EL4 EL5 EL6

13% 17% 23% 29% 55%

2% 4% 7% 12% 50%

29% 36% 46% 56% 83%

9% 13% 16% 22% 49%

10% 14% 18% 25% 63%

29% 39% 49% 59% 82%

14% 22% 30% 40% 71%

maket, the data was adjusted using the following weights:

 results derived from the LCC sample without adjusting to the US market Equipment class mix.

EL2 EL3 EL4 EL5 EL6

21% 26% 34% 42% 71%

15% 22% 28% 36% 67%

14% 18% 25% 32% 61%

13% 19% 24% 32% 65%

25% 30% 38% N/A N/A

15% 21% 28% N/A N/A

EL3 EL4 EL5 EL6

62% 66% 70% 82%

66% 70% 74% 86%

s. This dataset is similar to what AMCA used, however, some row were removed because they were considered out of scope or data was 
e AMCA sample:
* Calculation of the US market weights

US Market Units Percent

Axial Housed 33,500 7%

Panel 148,000 32%

Centrifugal Housed 88,000 19%

Centrifugal Unhoused 65,000 14%

Inline and Mixed Flow 26,500 6%

Radial 36,000 8%

Power Roof Ventilator 67,500 15%

Total 464,500 100%

 out of scope or data was missing.
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent
  required by 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Financial
  Officer of Jupiter Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) that, to his
  knowledge:

| | * | the periodic report of the Company on Form 10-QSB/A-1
        for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fully
        complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
| | * | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                                                                                                                            

|Date: April 4, 2005 | By: | /s/ Alexander Chen                     
|------------------- | --- | ---------------------------------------
|                    |     |                                        
|                    |     | Alexander Chen, Chief Financial Officer

---
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5142

To amend the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 to establish a condition on

the provision of assistance under the export enhancement program for

the export of durum wheat.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 30, 1994

Mr. ANDREWS of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To amend the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 to establish

a condition on the provision of assistance under the

export enhancement program for the export of durum

wheat.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. STOCK TO USE RATIO LIMITATION ON ASSIST4 ANCE FOR EXPORT OF DURUM WHEAT

5 UNDER EXPORT ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM.

6 Section 301(b) of the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978

7 (7 U.S.C. 5651(b)) is amended by adding at the end the

8 following new paragraph:
2

•HR 5142 IH

1 ‘‘(9) SPECIAL RULE FOR DURUM WHEAT EX2 PORTS.—In any marketing year for which the pro3 jected stock to use ratio prepared by the Secretary

4 of Agriculture for durum wheat is less than or equal

5 to 40 percent, the Commodity Credit Corporation

6 may not make available any assistance, whether in

7 the form of agricultural commodities, cash pay8 ments, or other bonus, under this section for the ex9 port of durum wheat.’’.

Æ
- [Untitled]
- [Untitled] 2
- [Untitled]
Case 16-25213 Doc 1 Filed 08/05/16 Entered 08/05/16 11:24:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 9
Case 16-25213 Doc 1 Filed 08/05/16 Entered 08/05/16 11:24:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 9
Case 16-25213 Doc 1 Filed 08/05/16 Entered 08/05/16 11:24:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 9
Case 16-25213 Doc 1 Filed 08/05/16 Entered 08/05/16 11:24:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 9
Case 16-25213 Doc 1 Filed 08/05/16 Entered 08/05/16 11:24:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 9
Case 16-25213 Doc 1 Filed 08/05/16 Entered 08/05/16 11:24:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 9
Case 16-25213 Doc 1 Filed 08/05/16 Entered 08/05/16 11:24:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 9
Case 16-25213 Doc 1 Filed 08/05/16 Entered 08/05/16 11:24:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 9
Case 16-25213 Doc 1 Filed 08/05/16 Entered 08/05/16 11:24:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 9
§ 18.88 Cross-examination. ( a ) The presiding officer may: ( 1 ) Require the cross-examiner to outline the intended scope of the examination; and
( 2 ) Exclude cross-examination questions that are immaterial, irrelevant or unduly repetitious.
( b ) Any party shall be given an opportunity to appear, either in person or through an authorized counsel or representative, to cross-examine witnesses. Before cross-examining a witness, the party or counsel shall state his name, address and occupation. If counsel cross-examines the witness, counsel shall state for the record the authority to act as counsel. Cross-examiners shall be assumed to be familiar with the direct testimony.
( c ) Any party or party's counsel who fails to appear at the hearing to cross-examine an “adverse” witness shall be deemed to have waived the right to cross-examine that witness.
( d ) Scientific, technical or commercial publications may only be utilized for the limited purposes of impeaching witnesses under cross-examination unless previously submitted and introduced in accordance with these regulations.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4939 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4939

  To designate the United States courthouse located at 201 South Vine 
 Street in Urbana, Illinois, as the ``Frederick S. Green United States 
                             Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 11, 1994

  Mr. Ewing introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Public Works and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To designate the United States courthouse located at 201 South Vine 
 Street in Urbana, Illinois, as the ``Frederick S. Green United States 
                             Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 201 South Vine Street in 
Urbana, Illinois, shall be known and designated as the ``Frederick S. 
Green United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Frederick S. 
Green United States Courthouse''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE> 30
EXHIBIT 99.2

                        PROMISSORY NOTE
Amount: US$200,000.00 (the "Principal Sum")

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Verida Internet Corp. (the "Promissor"), a
Nevada corporation with business offices located at 50 California
Street, Suite 1500, San Francisco, California, hereby promises to
pay in full on or before August 16, 2000 (the "Repayment Date")
the Principal Sum plus all accrued interest in lawful money of
the United States to McLellan Investments Ltd. (the "Promisee), a
British Columbia corporation with an address at 350-6165 Highway
17. Delta, British Columbia. The Principal Sum will bear an
effective interest rate of 8% per annum, the interest will accrue
from the effective date of this note to the Repayment Date,
inclusive, and will be payable on the Repayment Date. The
Promissor may repay the Principal Sum plus all accrued interest
early without penalty. Payment will be made to the Promissee at
the Promisee's address aforesaid.

The Promissor hereby waives presentment, notice of dishonour, and
notice of protest of this Promissory Note.

Dated, with effect, at the City of San Francisco, California.
this 16th day of August 1999.

                              VERIDA INTERNET CORP.

                              BY: /s/ Michael Hinshaw
                                   Michael Hinshaw, President