alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Clerk's Office Operating Status for August 28, 2020 - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Bh1yMU0HPv\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/clerks-office-operating-status-for-august-28-2020\/\">Clerk’s Office Operating Status for August 28, 2020<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/clerks-office-operating-status-for-august-28-2020\/embed\/#?secret=Bh1yMU0HPv\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Clerk’s Office Operating Status for August 28, 2020” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"Bh1yMU0HPv\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"The Clerk’s Office will be inaccessible for submitting paper filings, mail and courier deliveries, and night box submissions on Friday, August 28, 2020.\u00a0\u00a0Paper filings and submissions due on Friday, August 28, 2020, will be deemed as timely filed if received on Monday, August 31, 2020.\u00a0 Electronic case filing will remain available through CM\/ECF and electronic […]"}
V

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4863

To authorize the sale and reregistration of certain vessels.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 29, 1994

Mr. TAUZIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To authorize the sale and reregistration of certain vessels.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SALE AND REREGISTRA4 TION.

5 Notwithstanding any other law or any agreement

6 with the United States Government, the vessels SS LAKE

7 CHARLES (United States official number 619531) and

8 SS LOUISIANA (United States official number 619532)

9 may be sold to a person that is not a citizen of the United

10 States and transferred to or placed under a foreign reg11 istry if an application to authorize payment of operating12 differential subsidy to the vessels is filed at any time dur-
2

HR 4863 IH

1 ing the 20-year period after construction of the vessels and

2 is denied or 90 days elapses after the filing of that applica3 tion.

Æ
**EXHIBIT 31.2****RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)/CERTIFICATIONS OF CFO**I, Jon Gerlach, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of IKONICS Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.        Date:  August 14, 2007 /s/ Jon Gerlach   Jon Gerlach   Chief Financial Officerand Vice President of Finance
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.




Pursuant
      to 10 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 1350 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the Quarterly Report of
      Electronic Game Card, Inc. on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending September
      30,
      2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the "Report") for electronic Game Card, Inc., (the "Company"), the undersigned
      hereby certifies that :





|1) | to
              the best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements
              of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
              and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|2) | to
              the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
              presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result
              of
              operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date
                : November 23, 2007
            By:
                /s/ Lee ColeLee
                ColeActing
                President and Acting ChiefExecutive
                Officer
[Civ. No. 2473.

Second Appellate District.

February 5, 1918.]

#### IRL SOLOMON, Appellant, v. JUSTICES' COURT OF LOS ANGELES TOWNSHIP et al., Respondents.

Appeal—Record—Affirmance of Judgment.—A judgment will be affirmed on appeal where there is on file only a typewritten transcript setting forth the judgment-roll in the action, and no points and authorities in support of the appeal are on file.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Grant Jackson, Judge.

*153The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Irl Solomon, *in pro. per.,*for Appellant.

Carter & Torchia, for Respondents.

THE COURT.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered after the sustaining of a demurrer to a complaint without leave to amend. There is on file a typewritten clerk’s transcript setting forth the judgment-roll in the action, but no points and authorities in support of the appeal have ever been filed. As it is incumbent upon an appellant in any ease to make an affirmative showing that the trial court has committed error in the case, before he can be relieved from the effects of the judgment appealed from, the judgment is affirmed. As it appears to us that the appeal is frivolous, the respondents, in addition to any costs recoverable by them because of the affirmance of the judgment, shall have and recover from the appellant the sum of fifty dollars as damages.
#### § 7.16 Informal or formal complaints.

Any person may file either a formal or informal complaint against a manufacturer or provider alleging violations of section 255 or this part subject to the enforcement requirements set forth in §§ 14.30 through 14.38 of this chapter.

[83 FR 44842, Sept. 4, 2018]
No. 11-1193.

#### Baker et ux. v. Hobson et al.

App. Ct. Mass. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 21

                      COVENTRY CORPORATION SUBSIDIARIES

A.   Coventry Health and Life Insurance Company - Texas insurance corporation

B.   CHC Financial, Inc. - Tennessee
     B.1.  Coventry Health Plan of Pennsylvania, Inc. - Pennsylvania
           B.1.a. Coventry Health Plans of Western Pennsylvania - Pennsylvania
     B.2.  Coventry HealthCare Physician Management, Inc. - Delaware
     B.3.  Coventry HealthCare Properties, Inc. - Delaware

C.   Coventry HealthCare Development Corporation - Delaware
     C.1.  Coventry Health Plan of Tennessee, Inc. - Tennessee
     C.2.  Coventry Health Plan of Texas, Inc. - Texas
     C.3.  Coventry Health Plan of West Virginia, Inc. - West Virginia
     C.4.  Coventry Health Plan of Mississippi, Inc. - Mississippi

D.   Penn Group Corporation - Delaware
     D.1.  Healthpass, Inc. - Pennsylvania
     D.2.  HealthAmerica Pennsylvania, Inc. - Pennsylvania
           D.2.a. Penn Group Medical Associates, Inc. (NOTE: to be sold) -
                  Pennsylvania
           D.2.b. The Medical Center HPJV, Inc. - Pennsylvania
                  D.2.b.i.  Riverside Health Plan, Inc. - Pennsylvania

E.   Group Health Plan, Inc. - Missouri

F.   Coventry HealthCare Management Corporation - Virginia
     F.1.  Southern Health Services, Inc. - Virginia
     F.2.  Southern Health Benefit Services, Inc. - Virginia

G.   HealthCare USA, Inc. - Florida
     G.1.  Pennsylvania HealthCare USA, Inc. - Pennsylvania
     G.2.  HealthCare USA - Alabama, Inc. - Alabama
     G.3.  HealthCare USA Midwest, Inc. - Delaware
           G.3.a. HealthCare USA of Missouri, LLC - Missouri LLC
     G.4.  HealthCare USA - Ohio, Inc. - Ohio

H.   Coventry Healthcare Management Corporation - Delaware
#### A. J. Stowers, *Plaintiff in Error,*vs. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company, a corporation, *Defendant in Error.*

142 So. 882.

En Banc.

Opinion filed July 8, 1932.

*Evan Evams*and *Gyrus Smithdeal,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*R. A. Buford*and *F. D. Bryant,*for Defendant in Error.

Buford, C. J.

This was a suit to recover damages for personal injuries'received when an automobile in which the plaintiff was a passenger was driven into collision with a train of cars standing on the tracks of the Atlantic Coast Line Eailroad Company obstructing a highway crossing.

Demurrer was filed to the- original and to- the amended declaration and was sustained. The plaintiff in the court below refusing to further amend, judgment was entered on demurrer and writ of error was sued out.

The judgment should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment in the case of Key West Electric Co. vs. Albury, 91 Fla. 695, 109 Sou. 223, and cases there -cited. It is so -ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.

Brown, J., dissents.
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of NetFabric Holdings, Inc. (the “
Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Fahad
Syed Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





February
      19, 2009
                By:
                /s/ Fahad
      SyedName:
      Fahad Syed
                  Title:
      Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
NetFabric Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by NetFabric Holdings, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
No. 11-5082.

#### Jarvis v. Grady Management, Inc., et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 1996
10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           6,757
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          15,592
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,950
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    363,829
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        232,790
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,031
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 634,048
<DEPOSITS>                                     449,566
<SHORT-TERM>                                    37,525
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             10,553
<LONG-TERM>                                     14,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            89
<OTHER-SE>                                     122,315
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 634,048
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 18,025
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               22,325
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                40,350
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              16,679
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,545
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           22,805
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      210
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 630
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 16,972
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,083
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       9,083
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,602
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .69
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.45
<LOANS-NON>                                        896
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   822
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       20
<RECOVERIES>                                        19
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,031
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,031
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
- Memorial-197801-AL
AL 78 1
AL 78 2

- Memorial
Exhibit 31.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER REQUIRED BY

RULE 13A-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Denis M. Murphy, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Lighting Science Group Corporation;
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







|Date: May 1, 2017 | By:                                                         | /s/ Denis M. Murphy | 
|----------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------- | 
|                  |                                                             |                     | 
|                  | Name: Denis M. Murphy                                       |                    
|                  |                                                             |                     | 
|                  | Title: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |                    
|                  |                                                             |                     | 
|                  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)                |
Editorial Note on Part 74
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 74 appear at 64 FR 4055, Jan. 27, 1999.

§ 74.13 Equipment tests. ( a ) During the process of construction of any class of radio station listed in this part, the permittee, without further authority of the Commission, may conduct equipment tests for the purpose of such adjustments and measurements as may be necessary to assure compliance with the terms of the construction permit, the technical provisions of the application therefor, the technical requirements of this chapter, and the applicable engineering standards.
( b ) Equipment tests may be continued so long as the construction permit shall remain valid.
( c ) The authorization for tests embodied in this section shall not be construed as constituting a license to operate.
[38 FR 18378, July 10, 1973]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Depomed, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carl A. Pelzel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Date: March 16, 2011/s/ CARL A. PELZEL Carl A. Pelzel President and Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT
23.1








Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




We consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Forms S-3 (Nos.
333-157785, 333-103451 and 333-125276) and in the related Prospectuses and Forms
S-8 (Nos. 333-126248, 333-58817, 333-50289 and 333-50205) of Helix Energy
Solutions Group, Inc. of our reports dated February 26, 2010, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements of Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. and
subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
of Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. and subsidiaries, included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2009.






/s/ Ernst &
Young






Houston,
Texas


February 26,
2010
Exhibit 23





Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
Indiana Community Bancorp on Form S-8 of our report, dated March 5, 2009 on our
audits of the consolidated financial statements of Indiana Community Bancorp as
of December 31, 2008 and the year then ended, which report is incorporated by
reference in Indiana Community Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.  We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated March 5, 2009, on our audit of
the internal control over financial reporting of Indiana Community Bancorp as of
December 31, 2008, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form
10-K.














/s/ BKD,
LLP





Indianapolis,
Indiana


March 10,
2009
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4911

To authorize extension of the time limitation for a FERC-issued hydroelectric

license.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 5, 1994

Mr. INSLEE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To authorize extension of the time limitation for a FERCissued hydroelectric license.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding the time limitation of section 13 of

4 the Federal Power Act, the Federal Energy Regulatory

5 Commission, upon the request of the licensee for FERC

6 Project No. 3701, is authorized, in accordance with the

7 good faith, due diligence, and public interest requirements

8 of section 13 and the Commission’s procedures under such

9 section, to extend until May 31, 2000, the time required
2

•HR 4911 IH

1 for the licensee to commence the construction of such

2 project.

Æ