alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4705 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4705

 To authorize the appropriation of funds for the Federal share of the 
 cost of the construction of a Forest Ecosystem Research Laboratory at 
 Oregon State University in Corvallis, Oregon, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 30, 1994

 Mr. Kopetski introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize the appropriation of funds for the Federal share of the 
 cost of the construction of a Forest Ecosystem Research Laboratory at 
 Oregon State University in Corvallis, Oregon, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Forest Ecosystem Research Laboratory 
Authorization Act of 1994''.

SEC. 2. FOREST ECOSYSTEM RESEARCH LABORATORY.

    (a) In General.--Subject to the availability of funds appropriated 
under subsection (c), the Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the 
Cooperative State Research Service, shall provide the Federal share of 
the cost of planning and constructing a Forest Ecosystem Research 
Laboratory at Oregon State University in Corvallis, Oregon.
    (b) Federal Share.--The Federal share provided under subsection (a) 
shall be 50 percent.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000, to remain available 
until expended.
                                 <all>
```
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 6166** 

CLARENCE J. TURNER , Petitioner

– Appellant ,
v. HAROLD CLARKE, Director, Virginia DOC , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke
. Elizabeth K
. Dillon , District Judge. ( 7:15

- cv - 00200

- EKD

- RSB )

Submitted : April 11, 2016 Decided: April 28, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Clarence J. Turner, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Clarence J. Turner seeks to appeal the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The or der is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wron g. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, a nd that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that
Turner has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSE D
<page>
					  EXHIBIT 32.02




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Dean Witter Portfolio
Strategy Fund L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey
D. Hahn, Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation,
the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.






By:	  /s/	Jeffrey D. Hahn

Name:		Jeffrey D. Hahn
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		March 15, 2004
[{000214A0-0000-0000-C000-000000000046}]Prop3=19,11[InternetShortcut]URL=https://www.csce.gov/sites/helsinkicommission.house.gov/files/The%20Sex%20Trade-%20Trafficking%20of%20Women%20and%20Children%20in%20Europe%20and%20the%20U.S..pdfIDList=
No. 11-10123.

#### Curet *v.*United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 17.71 Prohibitions. ( a ) Except as provided in a permit issued pursuant to § 17.72, the provisions of paragraph (b) of this section and all of the provisions of § 17.61, except § 17.61(c)(2) through (4), apply to threatened species of plants, unless the Secretary has promulgated species-specific provisions (see paragraph (c) of this section), with the following exception: Seeds of cultivated specimens of species treated as threatened are exempt from all the provisions of § 17.61, provided that a statement that the seeds are of “cultivated origin” accompanies the seeds or their container during the course of any activity otherwise subject to the regulations in this subpart.
( b ) ( 1 ) Notwithstanding § 17.61(c)(1) and unless otherwise specified, any employee or agent of the Service, any other Federal land management agency, federally recognized Tribe, or a State conservation agency, who is designated by their agency or Tribe for such purposes, may, when acting in the course of official duties, remove and reduce to possession threatened plants from areas under Federal jurisdiction without a permit if such action is necessary to: ( i ) Care for a damaged or diseased specimen;
( ii ) Dispose of a dead specimen; or
( iii ) Salvage a dead specimen that may be useful for scientific study.
( 2 ) Any removal and reduction to possession pursuant to paragraph (b)(1) of this section must be reported in writing to the Office of Law Enforcement, via contact methods listed at *https://www.fws.gov ,* within 5 calendar days. The specimen may only be retained, disposed of, or salvaged under directions from the Office of Law Enforcement.
( 3 ) Notwithstanding § 17.61(c)(1) and unless otherwise specified, any employee or agent of the Service or of a State conservation agency that is operating a conservation program pursuant to the terms of an approved cooperative agreement with the Service that covers the threatened species of plants in accordance with section 6(c) of the Act, who is designated by their agency for such purposes, may, when acting in the course of official duties, remove and reduce to possession from areas under Federal jurisdiction those species.
( c ) For threatened species of plants that have a species-specific rule in §§ 17.73 through 17.78, the provisions of paragraph (b) of this section and § 17.72 apply unless otherwise specified, and the species-specific rule will contain all the prohibitions and any additional exceptions that apply to that species.
[89 FR 23940, Apr. 5, 2024]
§ 60-30.12 Prehearing conferences. ( a ) Upon his own motion or the motion of the parties, the Administrative Law Judge may direct the parties or their counsel to meet with him for a conference to consider: ( 1 ) Simplification of the issues;
( 2 ) Necessity or desirability of amendments to pleadings for purposes of clarification, simplification, or limitation;
( 3 ) Stipulations, admissions of fact and of contents and authenticity of documents;
( 4 ) Limitation of number of witnesses;
( 5 ) Scheduling dates for the exchange of witness lists and of proposed exhibits;
( 6 ) Such other matters as may tend to expedite the disposition of the proceedings.
( b ) The record shall show the matters disposed of by order and by agreement in such pretrial conferences. The subsequent course of the proceeding shall be controlled by such action.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report of China Evergreen Environmental Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Chong Liang Pu and Peh Chung Lim, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|             |  |                                      
|------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|May 15, 2006 |  | /s/ Chong Liang Pu                   
|             |  | Chong Liang Pu,                      
|             |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|             | 
|             |  | /s/ Peh Chung Lim                    
|             |  | Peh Chung Lim,                       
|             |  | Chief Financial Officer
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Burt Lee Burnett

, * From the 4 2nd District Court

o f Taylor County,

Trial Court No

. 28325A

Vs. No. 11

- 21

- 00 038

- CR * December 8

, 20 2 2

The State of Texas

, * Memorandum Opinion by Williams , J

. (P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion,

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology and Logistics), Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice of Advisory Committee meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Threat Reduction Advisory Committee will meet in closed session on Thursday, November 2, 2006, at the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA), and on Friday, November 3, 2006 in the Pentagon, Washington, DC.

The mission of the Committee is to advise the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology and Logistics) on technology security, combating Weapons of mass destruction, chemical and biological defense, transformation of the nuclear weapons stockpile, and other matters related to the Defense Threat Reduction Agency's mission.

In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix II), it has been determined that this Committee meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1), and that accordingly the meeting will be closed to the public.

# DATES:

Thursday, November 2, 2006, (8 a.m. to 4 p.m.) and Friday, November 3, 2006, (8 a.m. to 9:20 a.m.).

# ADDRESSES:

Defense Threat Reduction Agency, Defense Threat Reduction Center Building, Conference Room G, Room 1252, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Fort Belvoir, Virginia and the USD (AT&L) conference Room (3D1019), the Pentagon, Washington, DC.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Contact Mr. Eric Wright, Defense Threat Reduction Agency/AST, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, MS 6201, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6201. Phone: (703) 767-5717.

Dated: August 30, 2006.

L.M. Bynum,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 06-7443 Filed 9-5-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
§ 8.201 Incorporation by reference. Certain material is incorporated by reference into this subpart with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved incorporation by reference (IBR) material is available for inspection at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or Commission) and at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). Contact the FCC at the address indicated in 47 CFR 0.401(a), phone: (202) 418-0270. For information on the availability of this material at NARA, visit *www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations* or email *fr.inspection@nara.gov .* The material may be obtained from the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), IEC Central Office, 3, rue de Varembe, CH-1211 Geneva 20, Switzerland, Email: *inmail@iec.ch , www.iec.ch .* ( a ) ISO/IEC 17011:2017(E), *Conformity assessment—Requirements for accreditation bodies accrediting conformity assessment bodies,* Second Edition, November 2017; IBR approved for § 8.217.
( b ) ISO/IEC 17025:2017(E), *General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories,* Third Edition, November 2017; IBR approved for §§ 8.217; 8.220.
( c ) ISO/IEC 17065:2012(E), *Conformity assessment—Requirements for bodies certifying products, processes and services,* First Edition, 2012-09-15; IBR approved for § 8.220.
Note 1 to § 8.201 :
The standards listed in this section are co-published with the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 1, ch. De la Voie-Creuse, CP 56, CH-1211, Geneva 20, Switzerland; *www.iso.org ;* Tel.: + 41 22 749 01 11; Fax: + 41 22 733 34 30; email: *central@iso.org .*
Note 2 to § 8.201 :
ISO publications can also be purchased from the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) through its NSSN operation (*www.nssn.org*), at Customer Service, American National Standards Institute, 25 West 43rd Street, New York, NY 10036, telephone (212) 642-4900.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1235/2005

of 28 July 2005         

fixing the maximum export refund on barley in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For tenders notified on 22 to 28 July 2005, pursuant to the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005, the maximum refund on exportation of barley shall be 0,00 EUR/t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 29 July 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 July 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

(2)OJ L 174, 7.7.2005, p. 12.

(3)OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

----
I

★

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5153

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for an open

enrollment period under part B of the medicare program for individuals

formerly covered as retirees under group health plans of local educational

agencies.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 30, 1994

Mr. STARK introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to the

Committees on Ways and Means and Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide

for an open enrollment period under part B of the medicare program for individuals formerly covered as retirees

under group health plans of local educational agencies.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. OPEN ENROLLMENT UNDER PART B FOR RE4 TIREES FORMERLY COVERED UNDER GROUP

5 HEALTH PLANS OF LOCAL EDUCATIONAL

6 AGENCIES.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1837(i)(1)(A) of the So8 cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395p(i)(1)(A)) is amended
2

HR 5153 IH1S

1 by striking ‘‘employment,’’ and inserting ‘‘employment (or

2 by reason of the individual’s or the individual’s spouse’s

3 former employment with a local educational agency),’’.

4 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section

5 1837(i)(3)(A) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395p(i)(3)(A)) is

6 amended by inserting ‘‘(or former)’’ after ‘‘current’’.

7 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

8 The amendments made by section 1 shall take effect

9 January 1, 1995.

Æ
§ 90.743 Renewal requirements. Until January 1, 2023, all licensees seeking renewal of their authorizations at the end of their license term must file a renewal application in accordance with the provisions of § 1.949 of this chapter. Licensees must demonstrate, in their application, that: ( a ) They have provided “substantial” service during their past license term. “Substantial” service is defined in this rule as service that is sound, favorable, and substantially above a level of mediocre service that just might minimally warrant renewal; and
( b ) They have substantially complied with applicable FCC rules, policies, and the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.
[82 FR 41548, Sept. 1, 2017]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 27, 2009 

p0518 

Order 

 

May 27, 2009 

137701 & (28) 

 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137701 

 COA: 284052 

Oakland CC: 2003-190080-FH 

GREGORY PHILLIP KEITH, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 10, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The 

motion to remand is DENIED.
**Read more of the December Dispatch** Director’s Corner: Working with Local Communities to Reduce Crime: The Project Safe Neighborhoods National Conference
			  The Grand Rapids Police Department: Grassroots Initiatives for Recruitment and Trust-Building
            NASRO Hosts
National School Safety Leaders’ Summit
            January is Human Trafficking Awareness Month
            Meet Grady Judd: Leader of the Major Counties Sheriffs of America and Creator of Operation Naughty, Not Nice  North Charleston Police Department Wins Trust with Girls Football COPS Office 5th Annual Community Policing in Action Photo Contest Winners
            Spokane Police Department: Reform at its Best
            The Complete Package: Yavapai County Gets Everyone on Board to Decriminalize Mental Health
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 169 (Thursday, August 31, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 51803]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7289]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Institute of Standards and Technology


Judges Panel of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award

AGENCY: National Institute of Standards and Technology, Department of 
Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of closed meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. 
2, notice is hereby given that the Judges Panel of the Malcolm Baldrige 
National Quality Award will meet Thursday, September 14, 2006. The 
Judges Panel is composed of ten members prominent in the field of 
quality management and appointed by the Secretary of Commerce. The 
purpose of this meeting is to review the consensus process, select 
applicants for site visits, determine possible conflict of interest for 
site visited organizations, begin stage 3 judging process, discuss 
Judges' survey revisions, review feedback to first stage applicants, a 
debriefing on the State and Local Workshop and a program update. The 
applications under review contain trade secrets and proprietary 
commercial information submitted to the Government in confidence.

DATES: The meeting will convene September 14, 2006 at 8:15 a.m. and 
adjourn at 3 p.m. on September 14, 2006. The entire meeting will be 
closed.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the National Institute of 
Standards and Technology, Administration Building, Lecture Room D, 
Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Harry Hertz, Director, National 
Quality Program, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 
Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, telephone number (301) 975-2361.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Assistant Secretary for Administration, 
with the concurrence of the General Counsel, formally determined on 
December 27, 2005, that the meeting of the Judges Panel will be closed 
pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 
U.S.C. app. 2, as amended by Section 5(c) of the Government in the 
Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409. The meeting, which involves 
examination of Award applicant data from U.S. companies and a 
discussion of this data as compared to the Award criteria in order to 
recommend Award recipients, may be closed to the public in accordance 
with Section 552b(c)(4) of Title 5, United States Code, because the 
meetings are likely to disclose trade secrets and commercial or 
financial information obtained from a person which is privileged or 
confidential.

    Dated: August 24, 2006.
William Jeffrey,
Director.
[FR Doc. 06-7289 Filed 8-30-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-13-P