alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 169 (Thursday, August 31, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 51838]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7336]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Initial Review 
Group, Subcommittee F--Manpower & Training, NCI F--Initial Review of 
K01 and T32 Applications.
    Date: September 26-27, 2006.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn Georgetown, 2101 Wisconsin Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20007.
    Contact Person: Lynn M. Amende, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Resources and Training Review Branch, Division of 
Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive 
Blvd., Room 8105, Bethesda MD 20892, 301-451-4759, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f2939f979c96979eb29f939b9edc9c9b9adc959d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7819151d161c1d14381519111456161110561f17">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 25, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-7336 Filed 8-30-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Case 16-27304 Doc 12 Filed 08/26/16 Entered 08/29/16 10:32:39 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0961NACOLE Case Studies on Civilian Oversight: Office of Police Complaints (Washington, D.C.)The wave of high-profile incidents in 2020 between police and community members prompted widespread calls for greater community oversight of law enforcement agencies. Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement: Report on the State of the Field and Effective Oversight Practices, a white paper by the National Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement, outlines the history of civilian oversight including reference to this case study of the Washington (D.C.) Metropolitan Police Department and eight others.By National Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement (NACOLE)Categories: Data and AnalysisLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0961Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Jul 2021Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 01:59 (UTC-5) in 0.90 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Jones Soda Co. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jennifer L. Cue, Chief Financial
Officer and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                    |  |               
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------
|/s/ Jennifer L. Cue                                 |  | August 6, 2004
|Jennifer L. Cue                                     |  |               
|Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer |  |
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1090/2005

of 12 July 2005         

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of 21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 13 July 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 July 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1947/2002 (OJ L 299, 1.11.2002, p. 17).

----

ANNEX

to Commission Regulation of 12 July 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

----

(1)  Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 750/2005 (OJ L 126, 19.5.2005, p. 12). Code ‘            999            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

----
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 10.18

                              ISLAND PACIFIC, INC.

                             LA JOLLA LEASE SUMMARY

Lease Date:                       February 27, 2007

Landlord:                         Protea La Jolla Corporate Center, LLC

Address of Landlord:              3250 Holiday Court, Suite 100
                                  La Jolla, CA 92037

Premises:                         Approximately 6,446 square feet

Premises Address:                 3252 Holiday Court, Suite 226
                                  La Jolla, CA 92037

Term:                             5 Years

Monthly Rent:                     April 1, 2007 - March 31, 2008      $17,726
                                  April 1, 2008 - March 31, 2009      $18,436
                                  April 1, 2009 - March 31, 2010      $19,173
                                  April 1, 2010 - March 31, 2011      $19,940
                                  April 1, 2011 - March 31, 2012      $20,738

Estimated Operating Expenses:     Excess over 2007 calendar year

Tenant's Percentage:              10.04%

Cash Security Deposit:            $20,738
PUBLISH UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

________________ _________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. GEORGE ANTHON Y AUTOBEE, Defendant - Appellant. No. 17-1082 (D.C. No. 1:16- CV-01526-LTB

and 1:05-CR-00054-LTB-1) (D. Colo.)

________________ _________________ ORDER

________________ _________________ Before PHILLIPS , McKAY , and McHUGH , Circuit Judges.

________________ _________________
This matter is before us on Appellant George Autobee’s Unopposed Motion for 14-Day Extension of Ti me to File Petition for Panel Rehearing

. Under Federal Rule of Appe llate Procedure 40(a)(1), a party may file a petition for panel rehearing in most cases, including crimin al cases, within 14 days after entry of judgment. But in a civil case, when the United States is a pa rty, the time to petition for rehearing is 45 days. Fed. R. App. P. 40(a)(1)(B). We entered our Order Denying Certificat e of Appealability in this 28 U.S.C. § 2255 appeal on July 6, 2017. Assuming th at the 14-day period applies, Appellant FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### July 18, 2017
Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court2 requests an extension of time to file a petition for panel rehearing from July 20, 2017, to August 3, 2017. There is no question that the United States is a party to the litigation. The question is only whether a § 2255 procee ding is a civil case for purpos es of Rule 40. This court has not specifically decided this question. At least one of our sister circuits has assumed that the 45-day period applies. See Kusay v. United States , 62 F.3d 192, 193 (7th Cir. 1995) (noting the extra time to seek rehearing in a § 2255 appeal because it involves civil litigation to which the United Stat es is a party). We have said that § 2255 pr oceedings are civil for purposes of the time to appeal un der Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4. United States v. Pinto , 1 F.3d 1069, 1070 (10th Cir. 1993); see also Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings, Rule 11(b) (“Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a) governs the time to appeal an order entered under thes e rules.”); Rule 11(b) advisory committee’s note to 1979 amendment. 1 We see no sound legal basis to treat a § 2255 proceeding as civil for purposes of calculating a deadline under one rule of appella te procedure but as criminal for purposes of calculating a deadline under another rule. Accordingly, we conclude that § 2255 proceedings are civil cases for purposes of Rule 40. As a result, the time to petition for

1 The rules governing proceed ings in the United States District Courts under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, as approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States, were prescribed by the United States Supreme Cour t and transmitted to Congress pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3771, 3772, and 28 U.S.C. § 2072, by or der dated April 26, 1976.3 rehearing is 45 days and Appellant’s motion is denied as unnecessary.

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk
§ 68.604 Requirements for submitting technical criteria. ( a ) Any standards development organization that is accredited under the American National Standards Institute's Organization Method or the Standards Committee Method (and their successor Method or Methods as ANSI may from time to time establish) may establish technical criteria for terminal equipment pursuant to ANSI consensus decision-making procedures, and it may submit such criteria to the Administrative Council for Terminal Attachments.
( b ) Any ANSI-accredited standards development organization that develops standards for submission to the Administrative Council for Terminal Attachments must implement and use procedures for the development of those standards that ensure openness equivalent to the Commission rulemaking process.
( c ) Any standards development organization that submits standards to the Administrative Council for Terminal Attachments for publication as technical criteria shall certify to the Administrative Council for Terminal Attachments that: ( 1 ) The submitting standards development organization is ANSI-accredited to the Standards Committee Method or the Organization Method (or their successor Methods as amended from time to time by ANSI);
( 2 ) The technical criteria that it proposes for publication do not conflict with any published technical criteria or with any technical criteria submitted and pending for publication, and
( 3 ) The technical criteria that it proposes for publication are limited to preventing harms to the public switched telephone network, identified in § 68.3 of this part.
##### 



EX-99.1: CERTIFICATION OF CEO & CFO

Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
NTL (Delaware), Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), Barclay Knapp, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and John
F. Gregg, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

|                                                                                                 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 
|/s/ J. Barclay Knapp

Name: Barclay Knapp
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date: November 13, 2002 |  | 
|                                                                                                 |  | 
|                                                                                                
|                                                                                                
|                                                                                                
|                                                                                                
|/s/ John F. Gregg

Name: John F. Gregg
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date: November 13, 2002    |  | 

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Editorial Note on Part 97
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 97 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 97.15 Station antenna structures. ( a ) Owners of certain antenna structures more than 60.96 meters (200 feet) above ground level at the site or located near or at a public use airport must notify the Federal Aviation Administration and register with the Commission as required by part 17 of this chapter.
( b ) Except as otherwise provided herein, a station antenna structure may be erected at heights and dimensions sufficient to accommodate amateur service communications. (State and local regulation of a station antenna structure must not preclude amateur service communications. Rather, it must reasonably accommodate such communications and must constitute the minimum practicable regulation to accomplish the state or local authority's legitimate purpose. *See* PRB-1, 101 FCC 2d 952 (1985) for details.)
( c ) Antennas used to transmit in the 2200 m and 630 m bands must not exceed 60 meters in height above ground level.
[64 FR 53242, Oct. 1, 1999, as amended at 82 FR 27214, June 14, 2017]
#### § 90.904 Aggregation of EA licenses.

The Commission will license each Spectrum Block A through V in the 800 MHz band separately. Applicants may aggregate across spectrum blocks within the limitations specified in § 20.6 of this chapter.

[62 FR 41221, July 31, 1997]
Argued December 2;

decided December 28, 1909.

#### NEHALEM PACKING CO. *v.*TILLAMOOK COUNTY.

[105 Pac. 901.]

From Tillamook: William Galloway, Judge.

This is a proceeding by the Nehalem Packing Company to review the action of the board of equalization of Tillamook County in refusing to reduce the valuation of certain property assessed to plaintiff for the year 1907. From a judgment in favor of defendant the plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

For appellant there was a brief over the names of *Mr. Claude Thayer*and *Mr. Oak Nolan,*with oral arguments by *Mr. Nolan*and *Mr. George C. Fulton.*

For respondent there was a brief over the names of *Mr. John H. McNary*and *Mr. W. H. Cooper,*with an oral argument by *Mr. Charles L. McNary.*

Mr. Justice Eakin

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a proceeding to review the action of the Tillamook County board of equalization in refusing to reduce the valuation of certain canning machinery assessed to plaintiff, and to cancel the assessment to plaintiff of 5,100 cases of salmon, which it alleged it did not own. The questions involved here are identical with those in case of the *Elmore Packing Co.*v. *Tillamook County,*55 Or. 218 (105 Pac. 898), and the principles announced in that case apply equally here and determine this case adversely to the plaintiff. Judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.
Exhibit 10.14 - 2006 Equity-Based Incentive Comp Plan  (00129131.DOC;1)


Exhibit 10.14







Wausau Paper Corp.

2006 Equity-Based Incentive Compensation Plan




An individual officer’s grant at each tier will vest upon the Company’s achievement of targeted levels of return on capital employed for such tier and, with respect to the restricted stock units, the satisfaction of minimum service criteria.  The maximum potential award for the CEO, CFO, and each of the named executive officers is the cumulative award payable under each of Tiers I, II, and III.




						
	Tier I

	 	Tier II

	 	Tier III

	 
	Restricted stock units equal

	Options (100 shares 

	Options (100 shares 


	to 12% of base salary(1)

	per $2,000 base salary)(2)

	per $2,000 base salary)(2)







(1) Number of shares determined by closing price of Company stock ($15.20) on last business day preceding grant as markets were closed on date of grant.

(2) Exercise price of $15.20 per share (closing price of Company stock on last business day preceding grant as markets were closed on date of grant).
An official website of the United States government "Here is how you know"


Official websites use.gov  .gov
 Secure .gov websites use HTTPS 
	A lock https:


Menu
        ABOUTDirector's Corner
Contact COPS
Community Policing in Action: Photo Contest
The L. Anthony Sutin Award for Innovative Law Enforcement and Community Partnerships
Photo Galleries
Subscribe
NEWSPress Releases
Executive Order on Advancing Effective, Accountable Policing and Criminal Justice Practices to Enhance Public Trust and Public Safety
GRANTSSolicitation Finder
Funding Opportunities
How To Apply
Grants Deadlines and Announcement Dates
Compliance and Reporting
Program Documents
Grantee Success Stories
Award Announcement Map
RESOURCESCritical Incident Review: Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, TX
National Blue Alert Network
Resource Center/Publications
E-Newsletter: Community Policing Dispatch
Podcast Series: The Beat
Video Series: What’s New in Blue
Tribal Community Policing Resources
Community Policing Topics
Community Violence Intervention
Addressing Human TraffickingLabor Trafficking
Recruitment, Hiring & Retention
Filing a Civil Rights Complaint
TRAINING & TECHNICAL ASSISTANCECollaborative Reform InitiativeCRI-TAC
Critical Response
Organizational Assessments
COPS Training Portal
Training
ACCOUNT ACCESS
 SEARCH HERE: Search form
    Search
 
  2018 Community Policing in Action Photo Contest Winners                    
		                                December 27, 2017
 SPOTLIGHT
 SUBSCRIBE TO EMAIL UPDATES
 
 SUBSCRIBE TO CP DISPATCH
 ABOUT Contact COPS
	Community Policing in Action: Photo Contest
	The L. Anthony Sutin Award for Innovative Law Enforcement and Community Partnerships
	Photo Galleries
	Subscribe NEWS Press Releases
	Executive Order on Safe Policing for Safer Communities
 GRANTS Compliance & Reporting
	Program Documents
	Grantees
	Grantee Success Stories
	Agency Portal Video Tutorials
	Award Announcement Map RESOURCES National Blue Alert Network
	Recent Releases
	Resource Center/Publications
	E-Newsletter: Community Policing Dispatch
	Podcast Series: The Beat
	Video Series: What’s New in Blue
	Tribal Community Policing Resources
	Addressing Human Trafficking
	Community Policing Topics
	Recruitment, Hiring & Retention
 TRAINING & TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Collaborative Reform Initiative for Technical Assistance Center
	COPS Training Portal
	Training ACCOUNT ACCESS ACCESSIBILITY INFORMATION
 FOIA Language Access Plan Legal Policies and Disclaimers No Fear Act Open Government Plain Writing Privacy Policy USA.gov Whistleblower Protection Social Media Department of Justice Accessibility