alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Argued Feb. 2,

decided April 13, 1909;

rehearing denied May 17, 1910.

#### FOSKETT *v.*WARNER VALLEY STOCK CO.

[101 Pac. 190.]

From Lake: Henry L. Benson, Judge.

Statement by Mr. Justice Slater.

Plaintiff, D. T. Foskett, filed his cross-bill in equity to an action of ejectment, brought by the defendant, the Warner Valley Stock Company, a corporation, against him to recover the possession of the S. E. % of the S. E. 14 of section 22, the S. of the S. W. ti and the S. W. 14 of the S. E. % of section 23, township 39 S., range 24 E., W. M., in Lake County, Oregon. The pleadings and the facts upon which this case is based, except as hereinafter stated, are substantially the same as those stated in the case of *Morrow*v. *Warner Valley Stock Company,*56 Or. 312 (101 Pac. 171), with which this case was consolidated, by stipulation of the parties, for the purpose of trial in the lower court and in this court. The decree awarded the land to the defendant, and dismissed the bill for want of equity, from which plaintiff has appealed.

Reversed.

For appellant there was a brief over the names of *Mr. Andrew M. Crawford, Mr. John H. Hall*and *Mr.*
      *367
      *Edward B. Watson,*with oral arguments by *Mr. Crawford*and *Mr. Watson.*

For respondents there was a brief over the names of *Messrs. Coovert & Stapleton*and *Mr. Charles A. Cogswell,*with an oral argument by *Mr. Elmer E. Coovert.*

Mr. Justice Slater

delivered the opinion of the court.

Plaintiff settled upon this land in the fall of 1887, having purchased the possessory right of Samuel Ronge, who had settled thereon in 1886. It was then inclosed by á fence, and there had been erected thereon a house, a stable, sheds, hay and stock corrals. On January 15, 1889, he entered the land under the homestead law, under the same circumstances as did Morrow and his sons. He has resided upon the land and cultivated it continuously from the time of his first settlement, excepting during a portion of the year 1889, when he was enjoined from occupying the land by some proceedings initiated by R. F. McConnaughy. Plaintiff was one of the parties to the contest of J. L. Morrow and others against the State of Oregon and the defendant herein, and for that reason he did not make final proof, his entry having been canceled May 9, 1903, as the effect of the decision rendered March 16,1903, 32 Land Dec. Dep. Int. 54.

The legal principles announced and the conclusions reached in the case of *Morrow*v. *Warner Valley Stock Co.,*56 Or. 312 (101 Pac. 171), are conclusive here, from which it results that the decree of the lower court is reversed, and one entered here adjudging plaintiff to be the owner of the equitable title to the land *described;*that defendant holds the legal title thereto subject to plaintiff’s equity, and that it be required to convey the same to the plaintiff by proper deed, executed by its officers within 90 days from the time the mandate is entered in the court below, and in default thereof the decree stand as and for a conveyance.

Further prosecution of the ejectment action is perpetually enjoined. Reversed.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4883

To deny Federal benefits for 10 years to persons convicted of making a

fraudulent representation with respect to residence in order to receive

benefits from 2 or more States, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 1, 1994

Mr. ZIMMER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Operations

A BILL

To deny Federal benefits for 10 years to persons convicted

of making a fraudulent representation with respect to

residence in order to receive benefits from 2 or more

States, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4883 IH

1 SECTION 1. FEDERAL BENEFITS DENIED FOR 10 YEARS TO

2 PERSONS CONVICTED OF MAKING A FRAUDU3 LENT REPRESENTATION WITH RESPECT TO

4 RESIDENCE IN ORDER TO RECEIVE BENEFITS

5 FROM 2 OR MORE STATES.

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a person

7 who has received benefits or services during any period

8 under a program administered by a State or by a political

9 subdivision of a State eligibility for which is limited to

10 residents of the State or political subdivision (whether or

11 not the program receives Federal funds), has received ben12 efits or services during the period under such a program

13 administered by another State or by a political subdivision

14 of another State, and is convicted in Federal or State

15 court of making a fraudulent statement or representation

16 to either such program with respect to the place of resi17 dence of the person shall not be eligible, during the 10-

18 year period that begins with the date of the conviction,

19 to receive benefits or services under any program adminis20 tered by the Federal Government eligibility for which is

21 based on need.

22 SEC. 2. FEDERAL EFFORTS TO ASSIST IN PREVENTING

23 FRAUDULENT RECEIPT OF BENEFITS FROM 2

24 OR MORE STATES.

25 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretaries of Health and

26 Human Services, Agriculture, Education, Labor, and
3

•HR 4883 IH

1 Housing and Urban Development shall each design and

2 implement a program to assist the States in preventing

3 persons from engaging in conduct described in section 1.

4 (b) REPORTS TO THE CONGRESS.—Within 6 months

5 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretaries

6 of Health and Human Services, Agriculture, Education,

7 Labor, and Housing and Urban Development shall each

8 submit to the Congress a report on the activities under9 taken by the programs administered by such Secretaries,

10 respectively, to assist the States in preventing persons

11 from engaging in conduct described in section 1.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Mendocino County Resource Advisory Committee will meet September 15, 2006 (RAC) in Willits, California. Agenda items to be covered include: (1) Approval of minutes; (2) Handout Discussions, (3) Public Comment, (4) Financial Report, (5) Sub-committees, (6) Matters before the group, (7) Discussion—Approval of projects, (8) Next agenda and meeting date.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on September 15, 2006, from 9 a.m. until 12 noon.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Mendocino County Museum, located at 400 E. Commercial St., Willits, California. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Roberta Hurt, Committee Coordinator, USDA, Mendocino National Forest, Covelo Ranger District, 78150 Covelo Road, Covelo, CA 95428. (707) 983-8503; e-mail                         *rhurt@fs.fed.us*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public. Persons who wish to bring matters to the attention of the Committee may file written statements with the Committee staff by September 12, 2006. Public comment will have the opportunity to address the committee at the meeting.

Dated: September 4, 2006.

Blaine Baker,

Designated Federal Official.

[FR Doc. 06-7595  Filed 9-11-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
exv10w33



 





EXHIBIT
10.33




Cardiac Science Corporation

Certain Executive Officers — 2006 Base Salaries



     Base salary amounts were approved by the Compensation Committee, to be effective May 1, 2006,
as set forth below. The compensation arrangement between the Company and each executive officer
listed below is governed by an employment agreement between the Company and each executive officer.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Name	 	Title	 	2007 Base Salary
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	John Hinson

	 	Chief Executive Officer
	 	$	350,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Michael Matysik

	 	Chief Financial Officer
	 	$	240,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Kurt Lemvigh

	 	Vice President, International Sales
	 	DK 1,673,640
	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Darryl Lustig

	 	Vice President, North America

Cardiology Sales
	 	$	200,000
The State of TexasAppellee

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 13, 2014

No. 04-14-00339-CR and 04-14-00340-CR

Eddie VASQUEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR0910 and 2013CR11644

Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In the interest of the efficient administration of the court’s docket, we order Appeal Nos. 

04-14-00339-CR and 04-14-00340-CR consolidated. The parties must file motions, briefs, and 

other pleadings as if the appeals were one but put both appeal numbers in the style of the case. 

However, a record must be filed in each appeal, the record in each case will remain separate and, 

if supplementation of the record becomes necessary, the supplemental material must be filed in 

the appeal to which it applies. The cases must be argued together in one brief, as in a single 

appeal, and if oral argument is requested and granted, the entire case must be argued as a single 

appeal, with the total time limit for each party equal to the ordinary time limit for a party in a 

single appeal. The court will dispose of both appeals in the same judgment, opinion, and 

mandate.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 13th day of May, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### Selma KANTZ, Administratrix of the Estate of Manny Dyskant and Marian Dyskant, and Herbert Dyskant and Theodore Dyskant, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FUGATE & GIRTON DRIVEWAY CO., Inc., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 11236.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 8, 1951.

Jacob Rassner, New York City, David A. Christopher, Qeveland, Ohio, Jack Steinman, New York City, for appellants.

Pickrel, Schaeffer & Ebeling, Dayton, Ohio, William H. Selva, Dayton, Ohio, for appellee.

Before SIMONS, MARTIN, and Mc-ALLISTER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the arguments of counsel, and after consideration of the contention of the appellants that the District Court erred in directing the jury to return a verdict for the defendant, and it appearing that there was no error in the direction of the verdict or in the judgment entered, after due consideration,

It is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and is hereby affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>1,000

<S>                                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                          YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                    DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                                5,087
<SECURITIES>                                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         7,366
<ALLOWANCES>                                                            588
<INVENTORY>                                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                          0
<PP&E>                                                                7,328
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        7,035
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                       24,077
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                     0
<BONDS>                                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                                               0
<COMMON>                                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                                           23,193
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                         24,077
<SALES>                                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      6,627
<CGS>                                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         2,710
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                        609
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                       3,917
<INCOME-TAX>                                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                   3,917
<DISCONTINUED>                                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                                          3,917
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                          1.94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                             0


</TABLE>
Case 16-27561 Doc 7 Filed 08/27/16 Entered 08/27/16 12:25:38 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-27561 Doc 7 Filed 08/27/16 Entered 08/27/16 12:25:38 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
No. 11-1269.

#### Moore *v.*Omega Protein, Inc., et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 80.761 Conversion graphs. The following graphs must be employed where conversion from one to the other of the indicated types of units is required. ( a ) *Graph 1.* To convert effective radiated power in watts to dBk or to dBW, find the power in watts on the horizontal axis. Move vertically along the line representing the power to the diagonal line. Move horizontally from the diagonal to the right side to read dBW and to the left to read dBk.
( b ) *Graph 2.* To convert microvolts across 50 ohms to received power in dBW, find the signal in microvolts on the horizontal axis. Move vertically to the diagonal line, then move right horizontally to read dBW.
( c ) *Graph 3.* To convert received power in dBW to field intensity in dBu find the received power in dBW on the horizontal axis. Move vertically to the diagonal line, then move right horizontally to read dBu.
§ 90.645 Permissible operations. Conventional and trunked radio systems may be used: ( a ) Only for purposes expressly allowed under this part.
( b ) Only persons who are eligible for facilities, either under this subpart or in the radio service included under subparts B or C of this part.
( c ) Except for licensees classified as CMRS providers under part 20 of this chapter, only for the transmission of messages or signals permitted in the services is which the participants are eligible.
( d ) For digital or analog transmissions.
( e ) An SMRS licensee or a licensee who has been authorized a channel(s) on an exclusive basis, may use the system for the transmission of any base/mobile message, page or signal permitted in the service in which the participants are eligible.
( f ) Where the channel(s) is assigned to an SMRS licensee or exclusively to a single licensee, or where all users of a system agree, more than a single emission may be utilized within the authorized bandwidth. In such cases, the frequency stability requirements of § 90.213 shall not apply, but out-of-band emission limits of § 90.209 shall be met.
( g ) Up to five (5) contiguous 809-816/854-861 band channels as listed in §§ 90.615, 90.617, and 90.619 may be authorized after justification for systems requiring more than the normal single channel bandwidth. If necessary, licensees may trade channels amongst themselves in order to obtain contiguous frequencies. Notification of such proposed exchanges shall be made to the appropriate frequency coordinator(s) and to the Commission by filing an application for license modification.
( h ) Up to 10 contiguous 896-901/935-940 MHz band channels as listed in § 90.617 may be combined for systems requiring more than the normal single channel bandwidth. If necessary, licensees may trade channels amongst themselves in order to obtain contiguous frequencies. Notification of such proposed exchanges shall be made to the appropriate frequency coordinator(s) and to the Commission by filing an application for license modification.
( i ) Paging operations may be utilized on multiple licensed facilities (community repeaters) only when all licensees of the facility agree to such use.
[47 FR 41032, Sept. 16, 1982, as amended at 48 FR 51929, Nov. 15, 1983; 51 FR 37405, Oct. 22, 1986; 59 FR 59966, Nov. 21, 1994; 62 FR 18935, Apr. 17, 1997; 63 FR 68970, Dec. 14, 1998; 69 FR 67849, Nov. 22, 2004]
Exhibit 32







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Siclone Industries, Inc. a Delaware corporation (the Company), on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Bradley S. Shepherd, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







/s/Bradley S. Shepherd

Date: November 11, 2004

Bradley S. Shepherd

Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer
No. 11-9143.

#### Barboza-Maldonado v. United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 87.217 Frequencies. ( a ) Only one unicom frequency will be assigned at any one airport. Applicants must request a particular frequency, which will be taken into consideration when the assignment is made. The frequencies assignable to unicoms are: ( 1 ) 122.950 MHz at airports which have a full-time control tower or full-time FAA flight service station.
( 2 ) 122.700, 122.725, 122.800, 122.975, 123.000, 123.050 or 123.075 MHz at all other airports.
( b ) 121.500 MHz: emergency and distress only.
[53 FR 28940, Aug. 1, 1988, as amended at 55 FR 30464, July 26, 1990; 58 FR 67696, Dec. 22, 1993; 69 FR 32885, June 14, 2004]
May 29, 2015

Mr. John Weland

520 FM 306 #1102 New Braunfels, TX 78130

Dear Mr. Weland.:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your April 28, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-1284), but we are unable to pr ocess your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
#### §§ 95.2735-95.2739 [Reserved]
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5108

To extend the Export Administration Act of 1979.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 27, 1994

Mr. HAMILTON (for himself and Mr. GILMAN) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

A BILL

To extend the Export Administration Act of 1979.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 20 of the Export Administration Act of 1979

4 (50 U.S.C. App. 2419) is amended by striking ‘‘August

5 20, 1994’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 1995’’.

Æ
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 OR 15d-14 OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Zap.Com Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
    5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
    /s/ Leonard DiSalvoLeonard DiSalvoVice President  Finance and CFO
 16
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2014-0171

 Directorate Identifier: 2014NM038AD

8-32-173 --- 10/28/11

8-32-176 --- 2/11/13

8-33-56 --- 2/11/13

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008