alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[112th Congress Public Law 182]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 126 STAT. 1420]]

Public Law 112-182
112th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To authorize the exchange of land or interest in land between Lowell 
 National Historical Park and the city of Lowell in the Commonwealth of 
  Massachusetts, and for other purposes. <<NOTE: Oct. 5, 2012 -  [H.R. 
                                2240]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Lowell National 
Historical Park Land Exchange Act of 2012. 16 USC 410cc note.>> 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Lowell National Historical Park Land 
Exchange Act of 2012''.
SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS.

    The Act entitled ``An act to provide for the establishment of the 
Lowell National Historical Park in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 
and for other purposes'' approved June 5, 1978 (Public Law 95-290; 16 
U.S.C. 410cc et seq.), is amended in section 202, by <<NOTE: 16 
USC 410cc-22.>> adding at the end the following:

    ``(d)(1) The Secretary may exchange any land or interest in land 
within the boundaries of the park for any land or interest in land owned 
by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, the city of Lowell, or the 
University of Massachusetts Building Authority.
    ``(2) Except as provided in paragraph (3), an exchange under this 
subsection shall be subject to the laws, regulations, and policies 
applicable to exchanges of land administered by the National Park 
Service and any other terms and conditions that the Secretary determines 
to be necessary to protect the interests of the United States.
    ``(3) Where facilities or infrastructure required for the management 
and operation of the Lowell National Historical Park exists on the 
Federal land to be exchanged, and the non-Federal land or interest in 
land to be exchanged is not of equal value, the values shall be 
equalized by the payment of cash to the Secretary. The Secretary shall 
not be required to equalize the values of any exchange conducted under 
this subsection if the land or interest

[[Page 126 STAT. 1421]]

in land received by the Federal Government exceeds the value of the 
Federal land or interest in land exchanged.''.

    Approved October 5, 2012.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2240:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 112-450 (Comm. on Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 158 (2012):
            Apr. 24, 26, considered and passed House.
            Sept. 21, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
§ 14.32 Permits to import or export wildlife at nondesignated port to minimize deterioration or loss. ( a ) *General.* The Director may, upon receipt of an application submitted in accordance with the provisions of this section and §§ 13.11 and 13.12 of this subchapter, and in accordance with the issuance criteria of this section, issue a permit authorizing importation or exportation of wildlife, in order to minimize deterioration or loss, at one or more named Customs port(s) of entry not otherwise authorized by subpart B. Such permits may authorize a single importation or exportation, a series of importations or exportations, or importation or exportation during a specified period of time.
( b ) *Application procedure.* Applications for permits to import or export wildlife at a nondesignated port to minimize deterioration or loss must be submitted to the Director. Each application must contain the general information and certification required in § 13.12(a) of this subchapter, plus the following additional information: ( 1 ) The number and kinds of wildlife described by scientific and common names to be imported or exported where such number and kinds can be determined;
( 2 ) The country or place in which the wildlife was removed from the wild (if known), or where born in captivity;
( 3 ) The port(s) of entry where importation or exportation is requested, and the reasons why importation or exportation should be allowed at the requested port(s) of entry rather than at a designated port (information must be included to show that an importation or exportation at a designated port would result in a substantial deterioration or loss of the wildlife); and
( 4 ) A statement as to whether the exception is being requested for a single shipment, a series of shipments, or shipments over a specified period of time and the date(s) involved.
( c ) *Additional permit conditions.* In addition to the general conditions set forth in part 13 of this subchapter B, permits to import or export wildlife at a nondesignated port issued under this section are to be subject to the following conditions: ( 1 ) Permittee shall file such reports as may be specified on the permit, if any; and
( 2 ) Permittee must pay fees in accordance with § 14.94.
( d ) *Issuance criteria.* The Director shall consider the following in determining whether to issue a permit under this section: ( 1 ) Likelihood of a substantial deterioration or loss of the wildlife involved;
( 2 ) The kind of wildlife involved and its place of origin; and
( 3 ) Availability of a Service officer.
( e ) *Duration of permits.* Any permit issued under this section expires on the date designated on the face of the permit. In no case will the permit be valid more than 2 years from the date of issuance.
[45 FR 56673, Aug. 25, 1980; 45 FR 64953, Oct. 1, 1980, as amended at 61 FR 31869, June 21, 1996]
# California Snow Survey

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  California Snow Survey 

The NRCS Snow Survey Program provides mountain snowpack data and streamflow forecasts for the western United States. Common applications of snow survey products include water supply management, flood control, climate modeling, recreation, and conservation planning.

The NRCS Snow Survey Program provides mountain snowpack data and streamflow forecasts for the western United States. Common applications of snow survey products include water supply management, flood control, climate modeling, recreation, and conservation planning. NRCS CA is one of over 50 partners collecting and sharing data through the California Cooperative Snow Survey Program (Cooperative). The Cooperative is run by the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) and has been in operation since 1929. For additional snowpack and forecasting data from the Cooperative, please visit: https://snow.water.ca.gov/.

### Additional Snow Survey Information

#### Climate

              - National Water & Climate Center
              - California Data Exchange Center - DWR

----

##   2024 Water Supply Outlook Reports

CA Water Supply Outlook Report-May 2024(2.29 MB)

CA Water Supply Outlook Report-April 2024(2.1 MB)

CA Water Supply Outlook Report-March 2024(2.18 MB)

CA_Water Supply Outlook Report-Feb 2024(2.24 MB)

CA Water Supply Outlook Report-Jan 2024(2.44 MB)

##   2023 Water Supply Outlook Reports

CA Water Supply Outlook Report-May 2023(5.68 MB)

CA_Water Supply Outlook Report-April 2023.pdf(4.99 MB)

CA_Water Supply Outlook Report-MAR 2023(1.59 MB)

CA-Water Supply Outlook Report-Feb 2023(1.47 MB)

CA Water Supply Outlook Report-Jan 2023(1.63 MB)

##   2022 Water Supply Outlook Reports

CA Water Supply Outlook Report-May 2022(633.02 KB)

CA Water Supply Outlook Report-April 2022(623.18 KB)

CA Water Supply Outlook Report-March 2022(3.83 MB)

CA Water Supply Outlook Report-Feb 2022(1.37 MB)

CA Water Supply Outlook Report-Jan 2022(1.19 MB)

----

##   Contact

                  -    Ernesto De La RivaState Conservation Engineer 
                  -    530-792-5680  
                  -    Ernesto.Delariva@usda.gov 

## Find Your Local Service Center

    USDA Service Centers are locations where you can connect with Farm Service Agency, Natural Resources Conservation Service, or Rural Development employees for your business needs. Enter your state and county below to find your local service center and agency offices. If this locator does not work in your browser, please visit offices.usda.gov.
Memorandum 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

Subject: Summary of Stakeholder Meetings 

From: John Bradfield 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

To: Dockets EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-6002, EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0603, and EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0495 

This memorandum summarizes meetings held with stakeholders in the month of March, 2015 

On March 6, Sector Policy and Programs Division Associate Director Kevin Culligan and William Niebling, 

Senior Advisor for Congressional and International Affairs met with Satoshi Hashimoto and Keiji Ueda of 

the Mitsubishi Research Institute and Satoru lino of the Japan Ministry of the Environment. EPA 

generally answered basic questions about the clean power plan proposal for existing sources. 

On March 19, Sector Policy and Programs Division Associate Director Kevin Culligan met with Carrie 

Jenks of MJ Bradley. EPA generally answered basic questions about the clean power plan proposal for 

existing sources. 

On March 26, Associate Assistant Administrator for Climate and Senior Counsel for Air Joseph Gottman 

and Sector Policy, Programs Division Associate Director Kevin Culligan met with Steven Michel of 

Western Resource Advocates. EPA generally answered basic questions about the clean power plan 

proposal for existing sources. 

On March 27, Sector Policy and Programs Division Associate Director Kevin Culligan met with Paola 

Mellow and Kimberly Curran of Environment Canada. Meeting materials are attached. EPA generally 

answered basic questions about the clean power plan proposal for existing sources. 

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer. Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32.1





                                CERTIFICATION OF
               CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of I/OMagic
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2009 (the "Report"),
the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer and
Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to his knowledge:

         1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  May 8, 2009         By:  /s/ TONY SHAHBAZ
                                 ----------------------------------------------
                                 Tony Shahbaz
                                 Chief Executive Officer (principal executive
                                 officer) and Acting Chief Financial Officer
                                 (principal financial officer)

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 6043

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. RAHEEM AQUNA GREEN , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Wilmington

. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 7:18

- cr - 00022

- BO

- 2 ; 7:19

- cv - 00227

- BO )

Submitted : November 23, 2021 Decided: November 29, 2021

Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Raheem Aquna Green , Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May

- Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Joshua L. Rogers, Assistant Unite d States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Raheem Aquna Green, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s or der d enying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. When the United States or its officer or agency is a party in a civil case, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than 60 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4( a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). The district court entered its order on November 6, 2020. Green filed the notice of appeal on January 6, 202 1. Because Green failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny his motion for appointment of counsel and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 8 July 2005         

suspending the examination procedure concerning obstacles to trade consisting of measures imposed and practices followed by the Eastern Republic of Uruguay affecting trade in Scotch whisky

(2005/567/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 3286/94 of 22 December 1994 laying down Community procedures in the field of common commercial policy in order to ensure the exercise of the Community’s rights under international trade rules, in particular those established under the auspices of the World Trade Organisation (1), and in particular Article 11(2) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The examination procedure concerning obstacles to trade, consisting of measures imposed and practices followed by the Eastern Republic of Uruguay affecting trade in Scotch whisky, is hereby suspended.

Done at Brussels, 8 July 2005.

For the Commission

Peter MANDELSON            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 349, 31.12.1994, p. 71. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 356/95, OJ L 41, 23.2.1995, p. 3.

(2)OJ C 261, 23.10.2004, p. 3.

----
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4987

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in the construction

of the Orange County Regional Water Reclamation Project.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 18, 1994

Mr. KIM (for himself, Mr. COX, Mr. DORNAN, Mr. PACKARD, and Mr. ROYCE)

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on

Natural Resources

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate

in the construction of the Orange County Regional Water

Reclamation Project.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Orange County Re5 gional Water Reclamation Project Act of 1994’’.
2

•HR 4987 IH

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO THE RECLAMATION PROJECTS AU2 THORIZATION AND ADJUSTMENT ACT OF

3 1992.

4 Title XVI of the Reclamation Projects Authorization

5 and Adjustment Act of 1992 (43 U.S.C. 390h et seq.) is

6 amended by adding the following section:

7 ‘‘SEC. 1618. ORANGE COUNTY REGIONAL WATER RECLAMA8 TION PROJECT.

9 ‘‘(a) The Secretary is authorized to participate with

10 the Orange County Water District in the State of Califor11 nia, and other appropriate authorities, in the planning, de12 sign and construction of water reclamation projects to

13 treat up to 100,000 acre feet per year of wastewater efflu14 ent from the county of Orange, in order to provide new

15 water supplies for ground water replenishment, industrial

16 applications and other beneficial purposes, to reduce the

17 demand for imported water, and to reduce sewage effluent

18 discharged into the ocean near Huntington Beach.

19 ‘‘(b) The Secretary’s share of costs associated with

20 the project described in section (a) shall not exceed 25

21 percent of the total. The Secretary shall not provide funds

22 for operation or maintenance of the project.

23 ‘‘(c) There are authorized to be appropriated not

24 more than $60,000,000 to carry out this section, plus or

25 minus such amounts, if any, as may be required by reason

26 of changes in construction costs as indicated by engineer-
3

•HR 4987 IH

1 ing cost indexes applicable to the type of construction in2 volved.’’.

Æ
Order entered June 18, 2013

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 00149

- CV

LARRY M. GENTILELLO M.D., Appellant

V.

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN HEALTH SYSTEMS, ET AL, Appellee

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial Distr ict Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 07

- 6167



### O RDER

The Court has before it appellant’s June 5, 2013 motion to lift seal on record for appeal,

which is unopposed. The Court GRANTS the motion and DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to

unseal th e record in this case.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS

JUSTICE
§ 87.213 Scope of service. ( a ) An aeronautical advisory station (unicom) must provide service to any aircraft station upon request and without discrimination. A unicom must provide impartial information concerning available ground services.
( b ) ( 1 ) Unicom transmissions must be limited to the necessities of safe and expeditious operation of aircraft such as condition of runways, types of fuel available, wind conditions, weather information, dispatching, or other necessary information. At any airport at which a control tower, control tower remote communications outlet station (RCO) or FAA flight service station is located, unicoms must not transmit information pertaining to the conditions of runways, wind conditions, or weather information during the hours of operation of the control tower, RCO or FAA service station.
( 2 ) On a secondary basis, unicoms may transmit communications which pertain to the efficient portal-to-portal transit of an aircraft, such as requests for ground transportation, food or lodging.
( 3 ) Communications between unicoms and air carrier must be limited to the necessities of safety of life and property.
( 4 ) Unicoms may communicate with aeronautical utility stations and ground vehicles concerning runway conditions and safety hazards on the airport when neither a control tower nor FAA flight service station is in operation.
( c ) Unicoms must not be used for air traffic control (ATC) purposes other than to relay ATC information between the pilot and air traffic controller. Relaying of ATC information is limited to the following: ( 1 ) Revisions of proposed departure time;
( 2 ) Takeoff, arrival or flight plan cancellation time;
( 3 ) ATC clearances, provided a letter of agreement is obtained from the FAA by the licensee of the unicom.
[53 FR 28940, Aug. 1, 1988, as amended at 55 FR 30464, July 26, 1990]
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Alexander F. Cheperuk, Defendant.

County Court, Special Term, Nassau County,

October 29, 1970.

*James J. McDonough*for defendant. *William Gahn, District Attorney,*for plaintiff.

David T. Gibbons, J.

Defendant moves for an order to inspect the Grand Jury minutes, or, in the alternative, to dismiss the indictment herein.

By indictment dated July 13,1970, the Grand Jury of Nassau County charged the defendant with the crime of criminally negligent homicide (Penal Law, § 125.10) in the first count; the crime of leaving the scene of an accident (Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 600) in the second count; and operating a vehicle while impaired by the use of a drug (Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 1192, subd. 2) in the third count.

The court, after reading the Grand Jury minutes herein, is satisfied that the evidence presented is legally sufficient to sus^tain the first -and second counts of this indictment which charge the defendant with the crime of criminally negligent homicide and leaving the scene of an accident, respectively.

However, the court concludes that the evidence presented is not legally sufficient to sustain the third count of the indictment which charges the defendant with the crime of operating a vehicle while impaired by the use of a drug. The third count alleges that, “the defendant’s ability to operate such motor vehicle was impaired by the use of a drug, to wit: methaqualone ”.

Methaqualone is not a drug embraced within any of the four categories delineated in section 114-a of the Vehicle and Traffic Law,- nor is it a drug under subdivision 1 of section 114-a of the Vehicle and Traffic Law “which has been designated by the *499commissioner of health as habit forming, or any other drug which contains any quantity of a substance which the commissioner of health, after investigation, has found to have, and by regulation designates as having, a potential for abuse because of its depressant effect on the central nervous system.”

See sections 81.45 through 81.49 of title 10 (Health) of the Official Compilation of Codes, Rules and Regulations of the State of New York (10A NYCRR 81.45-81.49).

Accordingly, it is ordered, that the defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment herein is denied with respect to the first count thereof which charges the defendant with the crime of criminally negligent homicide, and with respect to the second count thereof which charges the defendant with the crime of leaving the scene of an accident; and the motion is granted to the extent only that the third count of the indictment charging the defendant with the crime of operating a vehicle while impaired by the use of a drug, is hereby dismissed.
5 November 2015

264P15

#### State v. Beamon Fowler

Defs *Pro Se*PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA14-1205)

Denied
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Source Direct Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Dated:  May 21, 2007

/s/ Deren Z. Smith

Name: Deren Z. Smith

Title:  Chief Executive Officer



Dated:  May 21, 2007

/s/ Kevin Arave

Name: Kevin Arave

Title:  Chief Financial Officer