alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 74 (Tuesday, April 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22763-22764]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9150]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (Bureau), as part 
of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, 
invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this 
opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information 
collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public 
Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 3507(a)(1)(D)). The Bureau is soliciting comments 
regarding the information collection requirements relating to the 
Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act that have been 
submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for review and 
approval. A copy of the submission may be obtained by contacting the 
agency contact listed below.

DATES: Written comments are encouraged and must be received on or 
before May 17, 2012 to be assured of consideration.

[[Page 22764]]

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by OMB number 3170-0005, 
by any of the following methods:
     Agency Contact: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau 
(Attention: PRA Office), 1700 G Street NW., Washington, DC, 20552: 
(202) 435-7741: CFPB_Public_PRA@cfpb.gov.
     OMB Reviewer: Shagufta Ahmed, Office of Management and 
Budget, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 
20503; (202) 395-7873.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information 
should be directed to Joseph Durbala, (202) 435-7893, at the Consumer 
Financial Protection Bureau, (Attention: Joseph Durbala, PRA Office) 
1700 G Street NW., Washington, DC 20552, or through the internet at 
CFPB_Public_PRA@cfpb.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act 
(Regulation G) 12 CFR Part 1007.
    OMB Number: 3170-0005.
    Abstract: The information collection will improve the flow of 
information to and between regulators; provide accountability and 
tracking of mortgage loan originators (MLOs), enhance consumer 
protections, reduce fraud in the residential mortgage loan origination 
process and provide consumers with easily accessible information at no 
charge regarding the employment history of, and publicly adjudicated 
disciplinary and enforcement actions against, MLOs.
    Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Affected Public: Businesses or other for profits.
    Estimated Number of Responses: 33,656.
    Estimated Time per Response: 27 minutes.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 15,183.

    Dated: April 6, 2012.
Chris Willey,
Chief Information Officer, Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.
[FR Doc. 2012-9150 Filed 4-16-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AM-P
```
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P363Cross-Deputization in Indian CountryJurisdiction in Indian country has long been complicated by multifaceted tribal, state, and federal laws, policies, and court decisions, making it difficult for law enforcement to effectively address many types of criminal offenses. Whether the victim and perpetrator belonged to a tribe, where the crime took place, and other circumstances must be considered before any action can be taken. But recent changes in tribal, federal, and state law have enabled tribal law enforcement to enforce a broader array of state and federal crimes by cross-commissioning and cross-deputizing their officers. This report - based on the work of the National Sheriffs' Association, which assembled a cross-deputization advisory panel - examines the jurisdictional and legal limits of cross-deputization and how it has been implemented in various law enforcement agencies in Indian country. It also describes some of the most promising practices and provides sample documents and agreements.By National Sheriffs' AssociationCategories: TribalLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p363Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Apr 2018Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 00:38 (UTC-5) in 0.19 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
September 9, 2011

Ms. Vanessa Hinkle (8P-AR) US Environmental Protection Agency Region VIII 1595 Wynkoop Street Denver, CO 80202-1129

Re: NOx Control Supplement to Attachment 2 of January 31, 2011 Response to Request for Reasonable Progress Information – Colstrip Generating Plant Units 3&4 Dear Ms. Hinkle: Enclosed please find PPL Montana’s submittal of a Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) Control supplement to Attachment 2 of our January 31, 2011 Reasonable Progress analyses for the Colstrip Generating Plant Units 3&4. We provide this supplement pursuant to EPA’s request in your May 18, 2011 correspondence, the subsequent discussions between EPA and PPL Montana, and the schedule for target submittal dates agreed upon on June 27, 2011. This supplement provides updated cost effectiveness analyses of selective non catalytic reduction (SNCR) and Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) technologies. Please contact me at 406-237-6932 or Reid Clemmer at 610-774-5475 with any questions. Sincerely, 

# James M Parker James M Parker, PE Manager, Environmental Compliance Services
JMP/rtc CC: Dave Klemp, Debbie Skibicki - MTDEQ
Attachment: Colstrip Units 3&4 NOx Addendum 9_9_11.pdf James M Parker Manager – Compliance Services, Env

PPL Montana, LLC 303 N. Broadway, Suite 400 Billings, MT 59101 Tel. 406.740.9998 Fax 406.237.6901

jmparker@pplweb.com
Nashua District Court

No. 81-407

#### L & R Rentals d/b/a Sears Rent-A-Car v. Matthew Judge

April 2, 1982

*Kenneth E. Churbuck,*of Nashua, by brief for the plaintiff.

*Nashua Law Center,*of Nashua *(Barbara B. Millar*on the brief), by brief for the defendant.

Memorandum Opinion

The plaintiff, L & R Rentals, sued the defendant, Matthew Judge, for money due on a contract to rent a motor vehicle. The dispute was whether the $5.50 insurance charge was a flat fee, as the defendant claimed, or a daily fee, as the plaintiff alleged. After a trial before *Paútelas,*J., judgment was rendered for the plaintiff, and the defendant appealed.

*328The trial court’s findings of fact and rulings of law are not before us, and we do not have a record of the conflicting testimony below. Our rules contemplate such situations, and provide in pertinent part:

> “Rule 13. The Record

> (3) The moving party shall be responsible for presenting to the supreme court a record sufficient for the court to decide the questions of law presented by the case. The supreme court may dismiss the case for lack of such a record.

> Rule 15. Transcripts

> (3) If the moving party intends to argue in the supreme court that a finding or conclusion is unsupported by the evidence or is contrary to the evidence, he shall include in the record a transcript of all evidence relevant to such finding or conclusion. .. .”

Sup. Ct. Rs. 13,15.

In accordance with these rules, the decision below is

*Affirmed.*
**Exhibit 32.1     Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of Milwaukee Iron Arena Football, Inc. pursuant to Section 906 of the****Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Milwaukee Iron Arena Football, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Richard Astrom, Chief Executive Officer of Milwaukee Iron Arena Football, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted        pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 19, 2011

/s/ RICHARD ASTROM        Richard AstromChief Executive Officer, Principal Accounting Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


     We have issued our reports dated April 28, 2003 accompanying the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Stellent, Inc. and
subsidiaries which are incorporated by reference or included in the Annual
report on Form 10-K/A of Stellent, Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2003. We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the
Registration Statements of Stellent, Inc. and subsidiaries on Forms S-8 (No.
333-11489, No. 333-66449, No. 333-66451, No. 333-90843, No. 333-47228, No.
333-47216, No. 333-47214, and No. 333-47212) and Forms S-3 (No. 333-33437, No.
333-57181, No. 333-30466, No. 333-34476, No. 333-32102, and No. 333-66094).


                                                /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota

April 19, 2004
EXHIBIT
32.1: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of China Water Group, Inc.
(the “Company”) certifies that:




1.           The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended March 31,
2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  June
      8, 2009
                  /s/ Wenge FangWenge
      Fang, Chief Executive Officer
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5051

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to prohibit insured depository

institutions from imposing any fees with respect to certain deposits

of rolled coins by individuals who are not more than 16 years of age.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 19, 1994

Mr. KLEIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs

A BILL

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to prohibit

insured depository institutions from imposing any fees

with respect to certain deposits of rolled coins by individuals who are not more than 16 years of age.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Youth Depositor Pro5 tection Act’’.
2

•HR 5051 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON IMPOSITION OF FEES WITH RE2 SPECT TO CERTAIN DEPOSITS OF ROLLED

3 COINS.

4 Section 18 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12

5 U.S.C. 1828) is amended by adding at the end the follow6 ing new subsection:

7 ‘‘(q) PROHIBITION ON IMPOSITION OF FEES WITH

8 RESPECT TO CERTAIN DEPOSITS OF ROLLED COINS.—

9 No insured depository institution may impose any fee in

10 connection with the deposit of rolled United States coins

11 into an account maintained at such institution by any indi12 vidual who is not more than 16 years of age.’’.

Æ
§ 80.858 Radiotelephone receiver. ( a ) The receiver required by § 80.854(a) of this part must be capable of reception of H3E and J3E emissions on the radiotelephone distress frequency. The receiver must be capable of reception of J3E emissions on 2638 kHz and the receiving frequencies associated with the transmitting frequencies authorized pursuant to § 80.855(a).
( b ) One or more loudspeakers capable of being used to maintain the distress frequency (2182 kHz) watch at the principal operating position and at any other place where the listening watch is performed must be provided.
( c ) The receiver required by paragraph (a) of the section must: ( 1 ) Have a sensitivity of 50 microvolts;
( 2 ) Be capable of operation when energized by the main source of energy, and by the reserve source of energy if a reserve source is required by § 80.860(a);
( 3 ) Be protected from excessive currents and voltages;
( 4 ) Be provided with a nameplate showing the name of the receiver manufacturer and the type or model.
( d ) The sensitivity of a receiver is the strength in microvolts of a signal, modulated 30 percent at 400 cycles per second, required at the receiver input to produce an audio output of 50 milliwatts to the loudspeaker with a signal-to-noise ratio of at least 6 decibels. Evidence of a manufacturer's rating or a demonstration of the sensitivity of a required receiver computed on this basis must be furnished upon request of a Commission representative.
[51 FR 31213, Sept. 2, 1986, as amended at 73 FR 4487, Jan. 25, 2008]
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

In re: 

Cynthia J Regas

Debtor(s)

Case No. 16-23891

CHAPTER 13 STANDING TRUSTEE’S FINAL REPORT AND ACCOUNT

Glenn Stearns, chapter 13 trustee, submits the following Final Report and Account of the 

administration of the estate pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1302(b)(1). The trustee declares as follows:

1) The case was filed on 07/26/2016.

2) The plan was confirmed on NA .

3) The plan was modified by order after confirmation pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1329 on

NA .

4) The trustee filed action to remedy default by the debtor in performance under the plan 

on NA .

5) The case was dismissed on 08/26/2016.

6) Number of months from filing to last payment: 0.

7) Number of months case was pending: 3.

8) Total value of assets abandoned by court order: NA .

9) Total value of assets exempted: NA .

10) Amount of unsecured claims discharged without payment: $0.00.

11) All checks distributed by the trustee relating to this case have cleared the bank.

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (9/1/2009)

Case 16-23891 Doc 15 Filed 10/27/16 Entered 10/27/16 09:29:16 Desc Page 1

 of 3
Receipts:

Total paid by or on behalf of the debtor $0.00

Less amount refunded to debtor $0.00

NET RECEIPTS: $0.00

Expenses of Administration:

Attorney’s Fees Paid Through the Plan $0.00

Court Costs $0.00

Trustee Expenses & Compensation $0.00

Other $0.00

TOTAL EXPENSES OF ADMINISTRATION: $0.00

Attorney fees paid and disclosed by debtor: $0.00

Scheduled Creditors:

Creditor

Name Class

Claim

Scheduled

Claim

Asserted

Claim

Allowed

Int.

Paid

Principal

Paid

Summary of Disbursements to Creditors:

Secured Payments:

Mortgage Ongoing

Mortgage Arrearage

Debt Secured by Vehicle

All Other Secured

TOTAL SECURED:

Priority Unsecured Payments:

Domestic Support Arrearage

Domestic Support Ongoing

All Other Priority

TOTAL PRIORITY:

GENERAL UNSECURED PAYMENTS:

Claim

Allowed

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Principal

Paid

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Interest

Paid

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (9/1/2009)

Case 16-23891 Doc 15 Filed 10/27/16 Entered 10/27/16 09:29:16 Desc Page 2

 of 3
Disbursements:

Expenses of Administration $0.00

Disbursements to Creditors $0.00

TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS : $0.00

12) The trustee certifies that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 5009, 

the estate has been fully administered, the foregoing summary is true and complete, and all 

administrative matters for which the trustee is responsible have been completed. The trustee 

requests a final decree be entered that discharges the trustee and grants such other relief as may 

be just and proper.

Dated: 10/26/2016

STATEMENT: This Unified Form is associated with an open bankruptcy case, therefore, Paperwork Reduction 

Act exemption 5 C.F.R. § 1320.4(a)(2) applies.

By:/s/ Glenn Stearns

Trustee

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (9/1/2009)

Case 16-23891 Doc 15 Filed 10/27/16 Entered 10/27/16 09:29:16 Desc Page 3

 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 184 (Friday, September 22, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55507-55508]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7754]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5045-N-38]


Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless.

DATES: Effective Date: September 22, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street SW., Washington, 
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234;

[[Page 55508]]

TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these 
telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V 
information line at 1-800-927-7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus 
Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for 
suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the 
purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been 
determined suitable or unsuitable this week.

    Dated: September 14, 2006.
Mark R. Johnston,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.
[FR Doc. 06-7754 Filed 9-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-M
§ 80.115 Operational conditions for use of associated ship units. ( a ) Associated ship units may be operated under a ship station authorization. Use of an associated ship unit is restricted as follows; ( 1 ) It must only be operated on the safety and calling frequency 156.800 MHz or 156.525 MHz or on commercial or noncommercial VHF intership frequencies appropriate to the class of ship station with which it is associated.
( 2 ) Except for safety purposes, it must only be used to communicate with the ship station with which it is associated or with associated ship units of the same ship station. Such associated ship units may be used from shore only adjacent to the waterway (such as on a dock or beach) where the ship is located. Communications from shore must relate to the operational and business needs of the ship including the transmission of safety information, and must be limited to the minimum practicable transmission time.
( 3 ) It must be equipped to transmit on the frequency 156.800 MHz or 156.525 MHz and at least one appropriate intership frequency.
( 4 ) Calling must occur on the frequency 156.800 MHz or 156.525 MHz unless calling and working on an intership frequency has been prearranged.
( 5 ) Power is limited to one watt.
( 6 ) The station must be identified by the call sign of the ship station with which it is associated and an appropriate unit designator.
( b ) State or local government vehicles used to tow vessels involved in search and rescue operations are authorized to operate on maritime mobile frequencies as associated ship units. Such operations must be in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section, except that the associated ship unit: May be operated from shore; may use Distress, Safety and Calling, Intership Safety, Liaison, U.S. Coast Guard, or Maritime Control VHF intership frequencies; and may have a transmitter power of 25 watts.
[51 FR 31213, Sept. 2, 1986, as amended at 81 FR 90746, Dec. 15, 2016]
# u.s. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT,ftrCE"IVED OFFICE OF HEARINGS

-

# n-1: : "
-**~** LUll 

### ! 

### l ! : l.j 

### b
In The Matter Of: HELOAIR, INC., Respondent. wASHINGTON, D.C. 

## AUG 132012 ) ) ) ) )


### NOTICE OFAPPEARANCE 

# HlEARING DOCKET Docket No. FAA-2012-0472 Case No. 2011-EA-210081

Respondent, HeloAir, Inc., hereby notifies the United States Department ofTransportation, Office ofHearings, and the Complainant, pursuant to 14 C.F.R § 13.204(b) that it shall be represented in the above-stated action by the attorney listed below. All communications, notices, pleadings, ordocuments are respectfully requested to be forwarded as follows:

Dated: August 7, 2012

{W2041620 I 009816-084619) John G. Butler, III, Esquire SANDS ANDERSON 

### PC Bank ofAmerica Center 1111 East Main Street, Suite 2400 Richmond, Virginia 23219 Telephone: (804) 648-1636 Facsimile: (804) 783-7291 Respectfully submitted, 

## ./} /;;j. 

# (5

# ~a; er, III, Esquire (VSB # 46200) (DCB # 460969) SANDS ANDERSON 

### PC Bank ofAmerica Center 1111 EastMain Street, Suite 2400 Richmond, Virginia 23219 Telephone: (804) 648-1636 Facsimile: (804) 783-7291CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have this date mailed, by United States mail, postage prepaid, an original and one copy ofthe foregoing Notice ofAppearance addressed to: Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 And further, that I have this date mailed, by United States mail, one copy ofthe foregoing Notice ofAppearance addressed to: Zachary M. Berman, Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AEA-7 Eastern Region Federal Aviation Administration 1Aviation Plaza Jamaica, New York 11434 Telephone: 718-553-3258 Facsimile: 718-995-5699 The Honorable J.E. Sullivan,AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, D.C. 20590 Telephone: 202-366-2132 Facsimile: 202-366-7536 Whit Baldwin, President HeloAir, Inc., Respondent 5721 Gulfstream Road Richmond, Virginia 23250 Telephone: 804-226-3400 Facsimile: 804-226-3494

Dated: August 7, 2012

{W2041620.1 009816-084619)