alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"20-1184: MODERNATX, INC. v. ARBUTUS BIOPHARMA CORPORATION [OPINION], Precedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"BdKLAONSnM\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/12-01-2021-20-1184-modernatx-inc-v-arbutus-biopharma-corporation-opinion-20-1184-opinion-12-1-2021_1872445\/\">20-1184: MODERNATX, INC. v. ARBUTUS BIOPHARMA CORPORATION [OPINION], Precedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/12-01-2021-20-1184-modernatx-inc-v-arbutus-biopharma-corporation-opinion-20-1184-opinion-12-1-2021_1872445\/embed\/#?secret=BdKLAONSnM\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“20-1184: MODERNATX, INC. v. ARBUTUS BIOPHARMA CORPORATION [OPINION], Precedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"BdKLAONSnM\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"OPINION Posted: MODERNATX, INC. v. ARBUTUS BIOPHARMA CORPORATION [OPINION](pdf) Appeal Number: 20-1184 Origin: PTO Precedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P166The High Point Drug Market Intervention StrategyOvert drug markets destroy neighborhoods, contribute to crime, and have a negative effect on communities. The arrest and imprisonment of drug dealers alone has not eliminated the problem. In 2004, the High Point (North Carolina) Police Department tried a different strategy and succeeded in eliminating the city's most notorious drug markets in a little over 3 years. What became known as the "High Point Model" has since been rolled out successfully as the Drug Market Intervention (DMI) strategy in many jurisdictions around the country and continues to be advanced under the umbrella of the National Network for Safe Communities. The High Point Drug Market Intervention Strategy tells the compelling story of designing and implementing the original intervention in High Point and describes a subsequent successful replication in Providence, Rhode Island. This publication is part of an ongoing series by the National Network for Safe Communities about its two core crime reduction strategies: thBy David M. Kennedy, Sue-Lin WongCategories: Nonviolent CrimeLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p166Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFBook • Aug 2012Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 02:19 (UTC-5) in 0.20 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
§ 301-11.603 What are the tax consequences of extended TDY? ( a ) If you are on a taxable extended TDY assignment, then all allowances and reimbursements for travel expenses, plus all travel expenses that the Government pays directly on your behalf in connection with your TDY assignment, are taxable income to you. This includes all allowances, reimbursements, and direct payments to vendors from the day that you or your agency recognized that your extended TDY assignment is expected to exceed one year, as explained in § 301-11.601.
( b ) Your agency will reimburse you for substantially all of the income taxes that you incur as a result of your taxable extended TDY assignment. This reimbursement consists of two parts: ( 1 ) The Withholding Tax Allowance (WTA). See Part 302-17, Subpart B of this Subtitle for information on the WTA; and
( 2 ) The “Extended TDY Tax Reimbursement Allowance” (ETTRA) (in previous editions of the FTR this was known as the “Income Tax Reimbursement Allowance”).
( c ) The WTA and ETTRA for taxable extended TDY assignments cover only the TDY benefits described in FTR Chapter 301, Subchapter B. On an extended TDY assignment, you are not eligible for the other benefits that you would have received if your agency had permanently relocated you.
[FTR Amdt. 2014-01, 79 FR 49643, Aug. 21, 2014]
#### § 95.571 FRS emission types.

Each FRS transmitter type must be designed such that it can transmit only the following emission types: F3E, G3E, F2D, and G2D.
Exhibit 10.4


DEPOMED, INC.


1995 STOCK OPTION
PLAN


NOTICE OF EXERCISE


To
Depomed, Inc. (the “Company”):


This constitutes notice
under my stock option agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto (the “Stock
Option Agreement”), that I elect to purchase the number of shares of Company
Common Stock set forth below:


	
  Type of option (check one)

  	
   

  	
  Incentive  o

  	
   

  	
  Nonstatutory  o

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Grant date

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Exercise price

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Number of shares
  as to which option is exercised

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Total exercise
  price

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Cash payment
  delivered herewith

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Value of                     
  previously owned shares of Company Common Stock delivered herewith

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Certificate to
  be issued in name of

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  



 


By this exercise, I agree
(i) to provide such additional documents as you may require pursuant to the
terms of the 1995 Stock Option Plan and my Stock Option Agreement, (ii) to
provide for the payment by me to you (in the manner designated by you) of your
withholding obligation, if any, relating to the exercise of my option, and
(iii) if this exercise relates to an incentive stock option, to notify you in
writing promptly after the date of any disposition of any of the shares of
Common Stock issued upon exercise of my option that occurs within two years
after the grant date of my option or within one year after the exercise date.











 


	
  

  	
  Purchaser:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  (Print Name):

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Tax I.D.:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Date:

  	
   

  
						



 


Purchaser’s spouse indicates
by the execution of this Notice of Exercise his or her consent to be bound by
the terms herein as to his or her interests, whether as community property or
otherwise, if any, in the shares hereby purchased.


	
  

  	
  Purchaser’s Spouse:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  (Print Name):

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Date:
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0957NACOLE Case Studies on Civilian Oversight: Office of the Inspector General (Los Angeles, California)The wave of high-profile incidents in 2020 between police and community members prompted widespread calls for greater community oversight of law enforcement agencies. Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement: Report on the State of the Field and Effective Oversight Practices, a white paper by the National Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement, outlines the history of civilian oversight including reference to this case study of the Los Angeles Police Department and eight others.By National Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement (NACOLE)Categories: Data and AnalysisLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0957Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Jul 2021Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 01:58 (UTC-5) in 0.89 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.01

                            GRANT GEOPHYSICAL, INC.
                             SUBSIDIARIES OF GRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
  Grant Geophysical, Inc.                             Parent  Delaware        June 27, 1978


                                                     PERCENT  JURISDICTION OF  DATE CREATED
         SUBSIDIARY NAME                              OWNED   INCORPORATION    OR ACQUIRED
         ---------------                              -----   -------------    -----------
<S>                                                    <C>    <C>              <C> 
  Grant Geophysical Services Corp.                     100%   Texas            Dec. 1987
  Norpac International, Inc. (Nevada)                  100%   Nevada           Feb. 1982
  Exploraciones Geofisicas Grant-Norpac Chile Ltda 
     (Inactive)                                        100%   Chile            Jan. 1988
  Grant Geophysical Ltd. (Inactive)                    100%   Canada           Mar. 1978
  Grant Geophysical (Int'l) Inc.                       100%   California       Apr. 1955
  Far East Petroleum Exploration B.V                   100%   Holland          Dec. 1987
  Grant Geophysical Unida S.A                          100%   Costa Rica       Dec. 1987
  Instrumentos Tecnicos E Pesquisas Ltda               100%   Brazil           Dec. 1987
* United Geophysical (Nigeria) Ltd.                    100%   Nigeria          Dec. 1987
  Sociedad Corporacion Ultramar de Colocaciones S.A    100%   Uruguay          Dec. 1991
  Grant Geophysical do Brasil, Ltda                    100%   Brazil           Dec. 1984
  Seiscom Products Corp. (Inactive)                    100%   California       Dec. 1987
</TABLE>


* Expected to be sold by April 30, 1997
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5093

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide a 1-year extension of

the applicability of certain provisions in the programs for block grants

regarding mental health and substance abuse, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 23, 1994

Mr. SANDERS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide a 1-

year extension of the applicability of certain provisions

in the programs for block grants regarding mental health

and substance abuse, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. BLOCK GRANTS REGARDING MENTAL HEALTH

4 AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE; TRANSFERS BE5 TWEEN ALLOTMENTS.

6 Section 205(b) of Public Law 102–321 (106 Stat.

7 415) is amended in each of paragraphs (1) and (2) by
2

•HR 5093 IH

1 striking ‘‘1993 or 1994’’ and inserting ‘‘1993, 1994, or

2 1995’’.

3 SEC. 2. MINIMUM ALLOTMENTS.

4 Part B of title XIX of the Public Health Service Act

5 (42 U.S.C. 300x–1 et seq.) is amended in each of sections

6 1918(b) and 1933(b) by striking ‘‘1993 and 1994’’ and

7 inserting ‘‘1993, 1994, and 1995’’.

Æ
- NJ 77 1
- NJ 77 2
- NJ 77 3
§ 15.25 Permits for personal pets. ( a ) *Application requirements for personal pets not intended for sale.* No individual may import more than two exotic birds as pets in any year. Each application shall provide the following information and such other information that the Director may require: ( 1 ) A description of the exotic bird to be imported, including; ( i ) The common and scientific names, number, age, and, when known, sex;
( ii ) A band number, house name, or any other unique identifying feature; and
( iii ) A statement as to whether the exotic bird was bred in captivity or taken from the wild;
( 2 ) A statement of the reasons the applicant is justified in obtaining a permit;
( 3 ) Documentation showing that the applicant has continually resided outside of the United States for a minimum of one year;
( 4 ) A statement of the number of exotic birds imported during the previous 12 months as personal pets by the applicant;
( 5 ) Information on the origin of the exotic bird, including; ( i ) Country of origin; and
( ii ) A description and documentation of how the exotic bird was acquired, including a copy of any Convention permit under which the bird was re-exported or exported. If there is no such permit, a sales receipt or signed statement from seller with name and address of seller, date of sale, species, and other identifying information on the bird or signed breeder's certificate or statement with name and address of breeder, date of sale or transfer, species and hatch date.
( b ) *Issuance criteria.* Upon receiving an application completed in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section, the Director will decide whether or not a permit should be issued. In making this decision, the Director shall consider, in addition to the general criteria in part 13 of this subchapter, the following factors: ( 1 ) Whether the proposed import would be detrimental to the survival of the exotic bird species in the wild;
( 2 ) Whether the exotic bird to be imported is a personal pet owned by the applicant, who has continuously resided outside the United States for a minimum of one year, and who has no intention to sell the bird; and
( 3 ) Whether the number of exotic birds imported in the previous 12 months by the applicant does not exceed two.
( c ) *Permit conditions.* In addition to the general conditions set forth in part 13 of this subchapter, every permit issued under this section shall be subject to special conditions that no individual may import more than two exotic birds as personal pets in any year, the exotic birds cannot be sold after importation into the United States, and any other conditions as the Director may deem appropriate.
( d ) *Duration of permits.* The duration of the import permits issued under this section shall be designated on the face of the permit.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4674 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4674

    To provide for the reliquidation of certain entries of imported 
                               chemicals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 29, 1994

   Mrs. Collins of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To provide for the reliquidation of certain entries of imported 
                               chemicals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RELIQUIDATION OF CERTAIN ENTRIES.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of 
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other provision of law, upon proper 
request filed with the United States Customs Service within 180 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Customs Service 
shall--
            (1) reliquidate the entries described in subsection (b) at 
        the rate of duty of 3.7 percent ad valorem; and
            (2) refund to the importer the appropriate amount of import 
        duty paid with respect to such entries.
    (b) Affected Entries.--The entries referred to in subsection (a) 
are as follows:
  

------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Entry No.                          Date of entry           
------------------------------------------------------------------------
             2403522-5                             10-31-91             
             2403773-4                             11-13-91             
             2483549-1                             03-09-92             
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                 <all>
```
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5053

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to extend for one

year Water Bank Act agreements that are due to expire

on December 31, 1994.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Water Bank Extension

5 Act of 1994’’.
2

HR 5053 EH

1 SEC. 2. SPECIAL AUTHORITY TO EXTEND WATER BANK ACT

2 AGREEMENTS.

3 (a) Subject to subsection (b), any agreement entered

4 into under the Water Bank Act (16 U.S.C. 1301 et seq.)

5 and due to expire on December 31, 1994, may be extended

6 for 1 year under section 6 of the Water Bank Act (16

7 U.S.C. 1305).

8 (b) The authority to extend Water Bank Act agree9 ments under this Act may only be exercised to the extent

10 that the amount available for obligation under the Wet11 lands Reserve Program (16 U.S.C. 1637 et seq.), and the

12 amount used for the extention of Water Bank Act agree13 ments under subsection (a), does not exceed $93,200,000

14 as provided for the Wetlands Reserve Program under the

15 Agricultural, Rural Development, Food and Drug Admin16 istration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1995.

Passed the House of Representatives October 4,

1994.

Attest:

Clerk.

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5053

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to extend

are due to expire on December 31, 1994.for one year Water Bank Act agreements that
314P15

#### State v. Omar Kareem Sellers

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA14-1272)

Denied