alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Bureau of Industry and Security

The Transportation and Related Equipment Technical Advisory Committee will meet on September 13, 2006, 9:30 a.m., in the Herbert C. Hoover Building, Room 3884, 14th Street between Pennsylvania & Constitution Avenues, NW., Washington, DC. The Committee advises the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration with respect to technical questions that affect the level of export controls applicable to transportation and related equipment or technology.

## Agenda

1. Welcome and Introductions.

2. Policy Overview.

3. Regulatory Overview.

4. Missile Technology Control Regime.

5. Wassenaar Issues for Discussion at September 06 Multilateral Meeting—Call for 2007 Proposals.

6. Presentation of Papers and Comments by the Public.

7. Reports on Working Groups.

Commodity Jurisdiction Working Group

Composite Material Working Group

8. Follow-up on Open Action Items.

9. Closing Comments.

                    The meeting will be open to the public and a limited number of seats will be available. Reservations are not accepted. To the extent time permits, members of the public may present oral statements to the Committee. Written statements may be submitted at any time before or after the meeting. However, to facilitate distribution of public presentation materials to Committee members, the Committee suggests that presenters forward the public presentation materials to Yvette Springer at                     *Yspringer@bis.doc.gov.*

For more information contact Ms. Springer on (202) 482-4814.

Dated: August 28, 2006.

Yvette Springer,

Committee Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 06-7384 Filed 8-31-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-JT-M
No. 10-10780.

#### Wallin *v.*Dycus et al.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the
undersigned certifies that this periodic report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of IKONICS
Corporation.

Date: August 10, 2005                    /s/ William C. Ulland
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         William C. Ulland
                                           Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
                                           and President

Date: August 10, 2005                     /s/ Jon Gerlach
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Jon Gerlach
                                            Chief Financial Officer
                                            and Vice President of Finance
Argued and submitted July 7, 1993,

affirmed May 4, 1994

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Appellant, v.*STEVEN ROSS TAYLOR, *Respondent.*

(92-CR-0281-ST; CA A76965)

873 P2d 344

Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Richard E. Forcum argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Forcum and Speck.

Before Richardson, Chief Judge, and Riggs and Haselton,* Judges.

*

 Haselton, J., *vice*Durham, J.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. *State v. Cookman,*127 Or App 283, 873 P2d 335 (1994).
SUPREME COURT.

#### The People agt. William Payne.

A charge to the jury that the credibility of a witness was a matter resting with themselves, irrespective of any contradictions that might appear in his testimony on the trial, and his affidavit on a former occasion:

Meld, erroneous.

*New York General Term, July,*1865.

*By the court,*Sutherland, J.

There were certainly material discrepancies between the affidavit of Knapp before the police magistrate and his evidence on the trial; and the evidence tended to show that he had given a somewhat different account of the transaction in conversations with various persons.

The prisoner was convicted on the testimony of Knapp alone.

■ According to the return, the charge of the city judge was as follows: *“*You have heard the evidence of Knapp; you can judge by his manner, and by his statement before you, what degree of credit you will give to his testimony. It is a matter resting purely with yourselves, irrespective of any *95contradictions that may have taken place either at the police office or in his statements as to his visits to the house in Cherry street.”

It appears *to*me that this was, in substance, instructing the jury that, in judging of the credit to be given to Knapp’s testimony, they must disregard the discrepancies between the affidavit and his testimony, and his contradictory statements.

If the jury probably and naturally inferred that the charge meant this, there must be a new trial.

I cannot see what other construction can be put upon the charge. The word irrespective means, not regarding, or considering, regardless of.

The district attorney, I have no doubt, had a right to read the whole affidavit to the jury, but I think there must be a new trial, on the ground of the error in the charge of the judge.

Leonard, J.

I think the word “irrespective” was probably intended by the judge to mean “uncontrolled,” and that the jury well enough understood that their discretion was not controlled by the contradictions of the witness, so that they were precluded from crediting him.

It may have been otherwise, and as Judge Sutherland *96has come to a different conclusion the question cannot be considered free from doubt. The prisioner is entitled to the benefit of the doubt. I concur that the verdict should be set aside and a new trial be had.

Note.—We had intended, in the last volume—35 *Howard's Practice Reports^*to have referred to the Digest contained in this work. Fiom and including the 30th volume, the Digest in each volume, has comprised a full and complete digest of *all the cases*reported in the respective volumes of reports therein mentioned. The *caption*to the digest in each of the volumes of this work, from and including the 30th, is calculated to mislead, as it says: “ Digest of the Points of Practice and Other Important questions, contained in the following reports.” When, in fact, it should read (as if will hereafter): “ Digest of all the Decisions contained in the following reports.” Reporter.

Barnard, J., dissented.
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0798Las Vegas After-Action Assessment: Lessons Learned from the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department's Ambush IncidentThe Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department (LVMPD) experienced a tragic loss on June 8, 2014, when two officers were ambushed and killed by two assailants. This report, sponsored by the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS Office), summarizes key findings from an after-action analysis of the ambush and subsequent police engagement with the assailants. The assessment team analyzed the event precursors, response, and aftermath to document lessons learned. These findings can be used by the larger law enforcement community to conduct self-evaluation and better prepare for similar incidents. This after-action report builds upon other analysis on violence against police, including the 2015 COPS Office publication Ambushes of Police: Environment, Incident Dynamics, and the Aftermath of Surprise Attacks Against Law Enforcement.By Zoe Thorkildsen, Ashley Shultz, Thomas Woodmansee, Drew TracyCategories: Homeland Security • Police Operations • Violent CrimeLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0798Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • May 2016Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 02:28 (UTC-5) in 0.19 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
Exhibit        23.4

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We        consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Form S-8 (No.        333-07377) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plans, in Registration Statement Form S-8        (No. 333-53400) pertaining to the Special Purpose Stock Option Plan, in Registration        Statement Form S-8 (N0. 333-73000) pertaining to the 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, in        Registration Statement Form S-8 (No. 333-73002) pertaining to the 2000 Stock Option Plan        and in registration Statement Form S-8 (No 333-72998) pertaining to the 2001 Consultant        Stock Purchase Plan of SPAR Group, Inc. and with Respect to the December 31, 2006        consolidated financial statements of SPAR Group, Inc included in the Annual Report (Form        10-K), for the year ended December 31, 2007 of our report dated February 20, 2008 with        respect to the financial statements of SPAR Solutions Merchandising Private Limited, as of        December 31, 2007 and for the year ended December 31, 2007.

 

|   | /s/ Nagesh Behl & Co. |
|--------|---------------------------|

 

New        Delhi, India

February        20, 2008

 

Ex-4

 

----
§ 95.343 Station operator responsibility and requirements. Each Personal Radio Services station must have an operator whenever the station is transmitting. The operator of a Personal Radio Services station is responsible for proper operation of the station in compliance with all applicable rules in this part. ( a ) Unless the station is operating under automatic control, the operator of a Personal Radio Services station must be located at a control point and monitoring communications while the station is transmitting.
( b ) For Personal Radio Services stations operating under the authority of an individual license, the licensee is responsible for proper operation of the station in compliance with all applicable rules in this part, regardless of who is operating the station.
( c ) For Personal Radio Services stations operating under the authority of an individual license, the licensee must maintain station records. If no individual license is required for a particular Personal Radio Service, the station operator must maintain the station records. Station records include copies of any FCC violation notices or other FCC letters received by the licensee or operator, any responses to such letters, each written permission received from the FCC, and other documents as the FCC may require be included.
#### Mrs. Lillie Mae Coulson, *Petitioner,*vs. State of Florida, *Defendant.*

143 So. 219.

En Banc.

Decision filed July 21, 1932.

*~W. W. Flournoy,*for Petitioner;

*Ccvry D. Landis,*Attorney General, and *Boy Campbell,*Assistant, for Respondent.

Per Curlim.

The judgment of the Circuit Court here on review on writ of certiorari should be quashed on authority of the opinion and judgment in the case of Willie Cooper vs. State of Florida, filed this day, and it is so ordered.

Judgment quashed.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown, and Davis, J.J., concur.
**Official websites use.gov****.gov**

**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS 	A lock****https:**

Acting Associate Attorney General Jesse Panuccio announces the National Blue Alert Network with the National Blue Alert Advisory Group

FCC Chairman Ajit Pai speaks at the National Blue Alert Network announcement

FCC Chairman Ajit Pai speaks at the National Blue Alert Network announcement

ICE Acting Director Thomas D. Homan speaks at the National Blue Alert Network announcement

ICE Acting Director Thomas D. Homan speaks at the National Blue Alert Network announcement

Deputy National Blue Alert Coordinator and COPS Office Supervisory Senior Policy Analyst Vince Davenport speaks at the National Blue Alert Network announcement

“Men and women who so bravely protect the citizens of this country should not have to fear becoming targets of senseless acts of violence simply because of their profession,” said Acting Associate Attorney General Jesse Panuccio

Attorney General Jeff Sessions, Acting Associate Attorney General Jesse Panuccio, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai with National Blue Alert Advisory Group members

# SPOTLIGHT

SUBSCRIBE TO EMAIL UPDATES

SUBSCRIBE TO CP DISPATCH

#### ABOUT

                    - Contact COPS
                    - Community Policing in Action: Photo Contest
                    - The L. Anthony Sutin Award for Innovative Law Enforcement and Community Partnerships
                    - Photo Galleries
                    - Subscribe

#### NEWS

                    - Press Releases
                    - Executive Order on Safe Policing for Safer Communities 

#### GRANTS

                    - Compliance & Reporting
                    - Program Documents
                    - Grantees
                    - Grantee Success Stories
                    - Agency Portal Video Tutorials
                    - Award Announcement Map

#### RESOURCES

                    - National Blue Alert Network
                    - Recent Releases
                    - Resource Center/Publications
                    - E-Newsletter: Community Policing Dispatch
                    - Podcast Series: The Beat
                    - Video Series: What’s New in Blue
                    - Tribal Community Policing Resources
                    - Addressing Human Trafficking
                    - Community Policing Topics
                    - Recruitment, Hiring & Retention

#### TRAINING & TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE

                      - Collaborative Reform Initiative for Technical Assistance Center
                      - COPS Training Portal
                      - Training

#### ACCOUNT ACCESS

#### ACCESSIBILITY INFORMATION

FOIALanguage Access PlanLegal Policies and DisclaimersNo Fear ActOpen GovernmentPlain WritingPrivacy PolicyUSA.govWhistleblower ProtectionSocial MediaDepartment of JusticeAccessibility
```

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 175 (Monday, September 11, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 53482]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7567]

[[Page 53482]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Advisory Committee for Geosciences, Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Advisory Committee for Geosciences (1755).
    Dates: October 4-6, 2006.
    Time: 9 a.m.-5:30 p.m. Wednesday and Thursday, October 4 and 5, 
2006. 9 a.m.-12 noon. Friday, October 6, 2006.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 
375, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Thomas Spence, Directorate for Geosciences, 
National Science Foundation, Suite 705, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, Virginia 22230, Phone 703-292-8500.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the contact person listed above.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice, recommendations, and 
oversight concerning support for research, education, and human 
resources development in the geosciences.
    Agenda:
    Day 1: Directorate Activities; Subcommittee Meetings.
    Day 2: Subcommittee Meeting and Reports; Directorate Activities.
    Day 3: Plans and Activities.

    Dated: September 5, 2006.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 06-7567 Filed 9-8-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-02-M
```
§ 73.1660 Acceptability of broadcast transmitters. ( a ) ( 1 ) An AM, FM, or TV transmitter shall be approved for compliance with the requirements of this part following the Supplier's Declaration of Conformity procedures described in subpart J of part 2 of this chapter. Note 1 to paragraph (a)(1):
The verification procedure has been replaced by Supplier's Declaration of Conformity. AM, FM, and TV transmitters previously authorized under subpart J of part 2 of this chapter may remain in use. See § 2.950 of this chapter.
( 2 ) An LPFM transmitter shall be certified for compliance with the requirements of this part following the procedures described in part 2 of this chapter.
( b ) A permittee or licensee planning to modify a transmitter which has been certified or approved with Supplier's Declaration of Conformity must follow the requirements contained in § 73.1690.
( c ) A transmitter which was in use prior to January 30, 1955, may continue to be used by the licensee, and successors or assignees, if it continues to comply with the technical requirements for the type of station at which it is used.
( d ) AM stereophonic exciter-generators for interfacing with approved or verified AM transmitters may be certified upon request from any manufacturer in accordance with the procedures described in part 2 of this chapter. Broadcast licensees may modify their certified AM stereophonic exciter-generators in accordance with § 73.1690.
( e ) Additional rules covering certification and Supplier's Declaration of Conformity, modification of authorized transmitters, and withdrawal of a grant of authorization are contained in part 2 of this chapter.
[63 FR 36604, July 7, 1998, as amended at 65 FR 30004, May 10, 2000; 65 FR 67304, Nov. 9, 2000; 82 FR 50835, Nov. 2, 2017; 88 FR 67186, Sept. 29, 2023]
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 174 (Friday, September 8, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 53133]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7517]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--American Society of Mechanical Engineers

    Notice is hereby given that, on August 28, 2006, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), American Society of 
Mechanical Engineers (``ASME'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing additions or changes to its standards development 
activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, since April 
28, 2006, ASME has published several new standards and initiated 
several new standards activities within the general nature and scope of 
ASME's standards development activities, as specified in its original 
notification. More details regarding these changes can be found at 
http://www.asme.org.
    On September 15, 2004, ASME filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on October 13, 2004 (69 FR 60895).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on May 2, 2006. 
A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) 
of the Act on May 22, 2006 (71 FR 29353).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 06-7517 Filed 9-7-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with this Quarterly Report of HIV-VAC Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the year period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin Murray,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the
         period ending March 31, 2005, fairly presents, in all material
         respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HIV-VAC
         Inc.

Date: September 2, 2010

/s/ Kevin Murray
Kevin Murray
Chief Executive Officer
Case 16-23891 Doc 7 Filed 07/28/16 Entered 07/28/16 16:19:25 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

      Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     I, Agustin Gomez de Segura, President and Chief Financial Officer of Cigma
     Metals Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
     Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1.   The  Quarterly  Report  on  Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended
     June  30, 2004 which this certification accompanies fully complies with the
     requirements  of  section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
     1934:  and

2.   The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: November 22, 2004                BY: /s/Agustin Gomez de Segura
      -----------------                    --------------------------
                                           Agustin  Gomez  de  Segura
                                           President and Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>