alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0711Collaborative Reform Model: Six Month Assessment Report of the Las Vegas Police DepartmentThe Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department (LVMPD) agreed to take part in an initiative by the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS Office), known as the "Collaborative Reform Model." As part of this initiative, LVMPD agreed to an in-depth assessment of its use of deadly force policies and practices. The original report, "Collaborative Reform Process: A Review of Officer-Involved Shootings in the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department," detailed how the COPS Office and CNA assisted LVMPD in adopting national standards and best practices as they relate to officer involved shootings. The assessment resulted in 80 reforms and recommendations. This status report "Collaborative Reform Model: Six-Month Assessment Report of the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department" is the first of two reports that CNA will publish on LVMPD's progress to inform all stakeholders.By George Fachner, Steven CarterCategories: Police OperationsLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0711Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Oct 2013Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 00:52 (UTC-5) in 0.19 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
#### BEECHER v. LEAVENWORTH STATE BANK et al. BEECHER v. UNITED STATES.

Nos. 12084A, 12084C, 12216, 12084D.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

March 5, 1951.

See also, 184 F.2d 498; 187 F.2d 448; 187 F.2d 858.

S. P. Beecher, in pro. per.

Henry R. Newton, Spokane, Wash., for appellee Fed. Land Bank of Spokane.

C. D. Randall, Spokane, Wash., Herman Howe, Seattle, Wash., for appellee Leavenworth State Bank.

Harvey Erickson, U. S. Atty., Frank R. Freeman, Asst. U. S. Atty., Spokane, Wash., Thomas R. Winter, Sp. Asst, to the Chief Counsel, B. I. R., Seattle, Wash., for the United States.

Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and STEPHENS and ORR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Beecher, the appellant in the appeals decided in our opinions numbered 12084A, 12084C, 12084D and 12216, has presented to this court four petitions seeking reconsideration of our decisions respecting the liability of the parties for costs.

These petitions were filed after the denial 1 of Beecher’s petitions for rehearing in these cases and after the expiration of the time provided by our Rule 25 for the presenting of petitions for rehearing. They are dismissed so far as they seek reconsideration of liability of the parties for costs. So far as the petitions state the amounts determinable as taxable costs, they are allowed as follows.

In appeal No. 12216:

Docketing in the Circuit Court $ 25.00

Notice of Appeal in District Court 5.00

Transcript (District Court) 189.00

Transcript (Court Reporter) 141.00

$360.00

In appeal No. 12084D:

Filing Notice of Appeal in the District Court and docketing case in the Circuit Court (Share) $ 10.00

Transcript 12084 Vol. 1, pp. 39-100 63 pages at 1.50 94.50

Transcript pp. 128-162, 46 pp. at .70 32.20

Transcript 12084 Vol. 3, pp. 522-556 44 pp. at 1.50 66.00

$202.70

As to No. 12084A, the cost bill fails to show what portions of the transcript used in this and other appeals are attributable to this appeal. Appellant is allowed 20 days’ time to file an amended cost bill as to this item. The other items are disallowed except for $5 for filing the notice of appeal and $25 docketing fee in this court.

The amount of taxable costs above determined are attributable to the parties in the proportions previously determined in the judgments in the respective appeals.

1

. Beecher’s petition for rehearing in No. 12216 was granted but limited solely to a question not involved in the instant petitions.
Exhibit 10.8a

                          AMENDMENT TO ESCROW AGREEMENT

         This Amended Escrow Agreement dated February 5, 2002, amends the Escrow
Agreement made on December 13, 2001, by and among Genesis Capital Corporation of
Nevada, a Nevada corporation ("Company"), Equity Planners LLC, Sea Lion
Investors LLC, and Myrtle Holdings LLC, all of which are Colorado limited
liability companies ("Purchasers"), and Sroya Holdings Company, Inc., a New York
corporation having a principal place of business at 1750 East 18th Street,
Brooklyn, New York 11229 ("Escrow Agent"), as follows:

         Paragraph 2(b) is amended by adding, at the end thereof, the following
sentence: "Any and all Escrow Shares used as Conversion Shares must be
replenished within twenty- four (24) hours of the release of any Escrow Shares
as Conversion Shares with common stock of the Company, issued in the name of the
Escrow Agent, which is freely tradeable and without restrictive legend of any
nature."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Escrow
Agreement to be duly executed and delivered, as of the day and year first above
written.

                                       COMPANY:
                                       Genesis Capital Corporation of Nevada


                                       By:
                                           -------------------------------------
                                                Richard Astrom, President


                                       PURCHASERS:

                                       EQUITY PLANNERS LLC


                                       By:
                                           -------------------------------------


                                       SEA LION INVESTORS LLC


                                       By:
                                           -------------------------------------


                                       MYRTLE HOLDINGS LLC


                                       By:
                                           -------------------------------------

ESCROW AGENT:
------------

SROYA HOLDINGS COMPANY, INC.


By:
   ------------------------------------
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0693Campus Threat Assessment Case Studies: A Training Tool for Investigation, Evaluation, and InterventionThe Campus Threat Assessment Case Studies: A Training Tool for Investigation, Evaluation, and Intervention will allow threat assessment team members to explore and practice threat assessment through small and large group exercises using pre-developed case studies. This guide will also strengthen team members' comprehension and application of the threat assessment principles proscribed in "Campus Threat Assessment Training: A Multidisciplinary Approach for Institutions of Higher Education," a program developed and delivered nationwide by Margolis Healy & Associates and funded by the COPS Office.By COPS OfficeCategories: School and Campus SafetyLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0693Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Oct 2013Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 02:14 (UTC-5) in 0.19 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
No. 10-11034.

#### Nelson *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Case 16-23057 Doc 10 Filed 07/25/16 Entered 07/26/16 11:12:04 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 32


                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Discovery Investments, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Chong Liang Pu, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Ren Cai Ding, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge, respectively, that:

(1)      The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



November 22, 2004                          By:      /s/ Chong Liang Pu
                                              ----------------------------------
                                                    Chong Liang Pu
                                                    Chief Executive Officer

November 22, 2004                          By:      /S/ Ren Cai Ding
                                              ----------------------------------
                                                    Ren Cai Ding
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
# CIC JPME II Alum Sean Hoewing reflects on impact of education

/ Published Jan. 21, 2020

Episode 2 of our Student Perspective series we introduce Sean Hoewing (USCYBERCOM) and his reflections on the education he received at the CIC.

Check out the video HERE
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     1996 Form 10K
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000866888
<NAME>                        Textainer Equipment Income Fund III, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         2,426
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  6,835
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,616
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               45
<PP&E>                                         112,018
<DEPRECIATION>                                 30,943
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 88,765
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,964
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     86,801
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   88,765
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               21,349
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  13,780
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (226)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                7,795
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   7,795
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 196 (Friday, October 9, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61209-61210]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-25844]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9935-23-OAR]

Acid Rain Program: Notice of Annual Adjustment Factors for Excess 
Emissions Penalty

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of annual adjustment factors for excess emissions 
penalty.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Acid Rain Program under title IV of the Clean Air Act 
provides for automatic excess emissions penalties in dollars per ton of 
excess emissions for sources that do not meet their annual Acid Rain 
emissions limitations. This notice states the dollars per ton excess 
emissions penalty amounts, which must be adjusted for each compliance 
year commensurate with changes in the Consumer Price Index (CPI), for 
compliance years 2015 and 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert L. Miller, Clean Air Markets 
Division (6204M), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460, at (202) 343-9077 or 
miller.robertl@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Acid Rain Program under title IV of the 
Clean Air Act limits annual sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions 
of fossil fuel-fired utility units. Under the Acid Rain Program, 
affected sources must hold enough allowances to cover their sulfur 
dioxide emissions, and certain coal-fired sources must meet an emission 
limit for nitrogen oxides. Under 40 CFR 77.6, sources that do not meet 
these requirements must pay a penalty without demand to the 
Administrator based on the number of excess tons emitted times $2,000 
as adjusted by an annual adjustment factor, which must be published in 
the Federal Register.
    The annual adjustment factor for adjusting the penalty for excess 
emissions of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides under 40 CFR part 
77.6(b) for compliance year 2015 is 1.9089. This value is derived using 
the CPI for 1990 and 2014 (defined respectively at 40 CFR 72.2 as the 
CPI for August of the year before the specified year for all urban 
consumers) and results in an automatic penalty of $3,818 per excess

[[Page 61210]]

ton of sulfur dioxide or nitrogen oxides emitted for 2015.
    The annual adjustment factor for adjusting the penalty for such 
excess emissions under 40 CFR 77.6(b) for compliance year 2016 is 
1.9126. This value is derived using the CPI for 1990 and 2015 and 
results in an automatic penalty of $3,825 per excess ton of sulfur 
dioxide or nitrogen oxides emitted for 2016.

    Dated: October 1, 2015.
Reid P. Harvey,
Director, Clean Air Markets Division, Office of Atmospheric Programs, 
Office of Air and Radiation.
 [FR Doc. 2015-25844 Filed 10-8-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
----

----

II Jogi aktusok, amelyek közzététele nem kötelező

Bizottság

----

A BIZOTTSÁG AJÁNLÁSA

(2005. június 3.)

a pénzforgalomban részt vevő euro-érmék nemzeti előlapjára vonatkozó közös iránymutatásokról

(az értesítés a C(2005) 1648. számú dokumentummal történt)

(Csak a dán, angol, finn, francia, német, görög, olasz, portugál, spanyol és svéd nyelvű szöveg hiteles.)

(2005/491/EK)

AZ EURÓPAI KÖZÖSSÉGEK BIZOTTSÁGA,

tekintettel az Európai Közösséget létrehozó szerződésre és különösen annak 211. cikkére,

mivel:

AJÁNLJA:

1. cikk

A kibocsátó tagállam azonosítása

A forgalomban résztvevő euro-érmék mindegyik címletének nemzeti előlapján fel kell tüntetni a kibocsátó tagállamot annak teljes vagy rövidített nevével.

2. cikk

A pénznem és az érmeérték megjelölésének elhagyása

3. cikk

Tájékoztatási eljárás

A tagállamoknak a hivatalos jóváhagyás előtt értesíteniük kell egymást az új nemzeti előlapok rajzolatáról, a peremjelöléseket is beleértve. E célból a kibocsátó államnak továbbítania kell az új rajzolatterveket a Bizottsághoz, amely késlekedés nélkül tájékoztatja az összes többi tagállamot a Gazdasági és Pénzügyi Bizottság megfelelő albizottságán keresztül. A Bizottság az új nemzeti érmetervekkel kapcsolatos összes információt közzéteszi az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapjában.

4. cikk

Az ajánlott gyakorlatok alkalmazási köre

Ez az ajánlás a közönséges euro-érmék és a forgalmi emlék-euroérmék nemzeti előlapjára, illetve peremjelölésére vonatkozik. Az ajánlás nem vonatkozik azon közönséges euro-érmék és forgalmi emlék-euroérmék nemzeti előlapjára, illetve peremjelölésére, amelyek első kibocsátása az ajánlás elfogadását megelőzően történt meg.

5. cikk

Címzettek

Ezen ajánlás címzettje a 974/98/EK rendelet 1. cikkében felsorolt összes tagállam.

Kelt Brüsszelben, 2005. június 3-án.

a Bizottság részéről

Joaquín ALMUNIA

a Bizottság tagja

----

(1)HL L 139., 1998.5.11.,  6. o. A 423/1999/EK rendelettel módosított rendelet (HL L 52., 1999.2.27.,  2. o.).

(2)HL L 139., 1998.5.11.,  1. o. A 2596/2000/EK rendelettel módosított rendelet (HL L 300., 2000.11.29.,  2. o.).

(3)  Lásd: „A Bizottság ajánlása a pénzforgalomban résztvevő euro-érmék nemzeti előlapja rajzolatának módosítására vonatkozó közös gyakorlatról” [HL L. 264., 2003.10.15.,  38. o.]

----
§ 95.919 CBRS replacement parts. The operator of a CBRS transmitter may replace parts of the CBRS transmitter as stated in this section. All other internal maintenance and repairs must be carried out in accordance with § 95.319. ( a ) A damaged antenna on a hand-held portable CBRS transmitter may be replaced by another antenna of the same or a compatible similar type.
( b ) Batteries in a hand-held portable CBRS transmitter may be replaced with batteries of a type specified by the manufacturer.
( c ) A detachable external microphone may be replaced with any external microphone that does not alter the modulation characteristics in a way that results in a violation of §§ 95.967, 95.973, 95.975 or 95.979.
( d ) Changing plug-in modules which were certified as part of the CBRS transmitter.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4954

To amend the Fair Housing Act to provide sanctions for the filing of certain

complaints.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 12, 1994

Mrs. MALONEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Fair Housing Act to provide sanctions for

the filing of certain complaints.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Free Speech Protection

5 Act of 1994’’.

6 SEC. 2. FAIR HOUSING ACT AMENDMENT.

7 Section 810 of the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C.

8 3610) is amended by adding at the end the following:

9 ‘‘(i) SANCTIONS FOR IMPERMISSIBLE COM10 PLAINTS.—
2

•HR 4954 IH

1 ‘‘(1) GENERALLY.—If the Secretary determines

2 that a complaint filed under this section is an imper3 missible complaint, the Secretary—

4 ‘‘(A) shall promptly dismiss the complaint;

5 and

6 ‘‘(B) may impose appropriate sanctions on

7 the person filing the complaint, including the

8 assessment of all costs (including attorney’s

9 fees) incurred by the respondent as a result of

10 the filing.

11 ‘‘(2) DEFINITION OF IMPERMISSIBLE COM12 PLAINT.—For the purposes of this subsection, an

13 impermissible complaint is a complaint filed under

14 subsection (a) that is—

15 ‘‘(A) frivolous; or

16 ‘‘(B) filed for the purpose of harassing or

17 intimidating a person or a class of persons from

18 exercising a right protected under the Constitu19 tion to engage in free speech, free press, or free

20 assembly, or to petition government for the re21 dress of grievances.’’.

Æ