alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1: Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications
 
 I, Wenge Fang, certify that:
 
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of China Water Group, Inc. (the “Registrant”);
  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
  4.  The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and have:
  a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this  report is being prepared;
  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
  c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
  5.  The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the smaller reporting Registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.
  Date: November 23, 2011
/s/ Wenge FangWenge Fang, Chief Executive Officer
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Apollo Medical Holdings, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter   ended July 31, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, A. Noel DeWinter, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities     Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section  1350 and is not being filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.








Dated:  November
      9, 2009
            By:
            /s/ A. NOEL
  DEWINTERNoel
      DeWinter
              Chief
      Financial Officer
No. 11-5992.

#### Upton *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
§ 100.18 Regulation adoption process. ( a ) The Board will accept proposals for changes to the Federal subsistence regulations in subparts C or D of this part according to a published schedule, except for proposals for emergency and temporary special actions, which the Board will accept according to procedures set forth in § 100.19. The Board may establish a rotating schedule for accepting proposals on various sections of subpart C or subpart D regulations over a period of years. The Board will develop and publish proposed regulations in the Federal Register, publish notice in local newspapers, and distribute comments on the proposed regulations in the form of proposals for public review. ( 1 ) Proposals shall be made available for at least a thirty (30) day review by the Regional Councils. Regional Councils shall forward their recommendations on proposals to the Board. Such proposals with recommendations may be submitted in the time period as specified by the Board or as a part of the Regional Council's annual report described in § 100.11, whichever is earlier.
( 2 ) The Board shall publish notice throughout Alaska of the availability of proposals received.
( 3 ) The public shall have at least thirty (30) days to review and comment on proposals.
( 4 ) After the comment period the Board shall meet to receive public testimony and consider the proposals. The Board shall consider traditional use patterns when establishing harvest levels and seasons, and methods and means. The Board may choose not to follow any recommendation which the Board determines is not supported by substantial evidence, violates recognized principles of fish and wildlife conservation, or would be detrimental to the satisfaction of subsistence needs. If a recommendation approved by a Regional Council is not adopted by the Board, the Board shall set forth the factual basis and the reasons for its decision in writing to the Regional Council.
( 5 ) Following consideration of the proposals the Board shall publish final regulations pertaining to subparts C and D of this part in the Federal Register.
( b ) Proposals for changes to subparts A and B of this part shall be accepted by the Secretary of the Interior in accordance with 43 CFR part 14.
[67 FR 30563, May 7, 2002, as amended at 75 FR 63092, Oct. 14, 2010]
Exhibit 23





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-99096, 333-35122, 333-81916 and 333-166471 of Indiana Community Bancorp on Form S-8 and in Registration Statement No. 333-156967 of Indiana Community Bancorp on Form S-3 of our report, dated March 11, 2011 on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Indiana Community Bancorp as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010, which report is incorporated by reference in Indiana Community Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.











Indianapolis, Indiana


March 11, 2011
§ 15.31 Criteria for including species in the approved list for captive-bred species. The Director will periodically review the list of captive-bred exotic bird species in paragraph 15.33(a), for which importation into the United States is approved. Any exotic bird species listed in paragraph 15.33(a) pursuant to this section must meet all of the following criteria: ( a ) All specimens of the species known to be in trade (legal or illegal) are captive-bred;
( b ) No specimens of the species are known to be removed from the wild for commercial purposes;
( c ) Any importation of specimens of the species would not be detrimental to the survival of the species in the wild; and
( d ) Adequate enforcement controls are in place to ensure compliance with paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 4, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
135828 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 135828 COA: 281126 Saginaw CC: 06-027654-FH; 06-027657-FH WILLIE LAMORE SMITH, III, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the December 28, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

K ELLY
, J., would remand this case for a hearing pursuant to People v Ginther , 390 Mich 436 (1973).

p0528 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 4, 2008

Clerk
No. 11-5996.

#### Gardner *v.*Westberg et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Split Phase Resilient Base Motors

6 www.aosmithmotors.com

Continued on next page

$

$

Features: Class “B” Ins. • Continuous Duty • Energy Efficient $ (see notes) • Open and

TEAO • Reversible • Sleeve & Ball Bearing • 60 HZ (50 HZ per notes)

ARS2020L

Belt Drive and Blower Applications

Features

• Class “B” Ins. • Open and TEAO • Sleeve & Ball Bearing

• Continuous Duty • Reversible • 60 HZ (50 HZ per notes)

• Energy Efficient $

(see notes)

SPLIT PHASE - NEMA AND UNITY SERVICE FACTOR

F.L. Stock A p p r o x . Dim. Conn.

HP RPM Volts Amps S.F. Frame Number Alternate Bearings Protector “C” “AG” Enclosure Dia. Notes

1⁄6 1725 115 4.0 1.35 48/56 GF2014 Sleeve Auto 8.9 7 Open 39 1

115 4.0 1.35 48 RS2014L Sleeve None 8.9 7 Open 39

115 3.8 1.35 48Z RB2014 Ball Auto 9.3 7.3 Open 39 10

1⁄4 1425 220 2.7 1.35 48 GF2025 Sleeve Auto 9.4 7.5 Open 39 4,11

1725 115 5.5 1.0 48 GF2020L Sleeve None 8.9 7 Open 39

115 4.2 1.0 48 ARS2020L Sleeve None 9.4 7.5 TEAO 39 2

115 3.8 1.35 48/56 SC6024A Sleeve Auto 9.2 7.3 Open 104 1,3,11

115 4.6 1.35 48/56 GF2024 Sleeve Auto 9 2 7.3 Open 39 1

115/230 4.6/2.3 1.35 48/56 GF2024D Sleeve Auto 9.2 7.3 Open 38 1

115/208-230 4.6/2.3 1.35 48/56 BF2024 Ball Auto 9.2 7.3 Open 38 1,7

115 4.2 1.35 48 RB2024 Ball Auto 9.4 7.5 Open 39

1140 115 5.3 1.00 56 ARS2026L Sleeve None 10.8 8.6 TEAO 39 2,11

115 5.3 1.35 56 RB2026L Ball None 10.8 8.6 Open 39

1⁄3 1425 220 3.2 1.35 48 GF2035 Sleeve Auto 10.4 8.5 Open 39 4

1725 115 6.2 1.0 48 GF2030L Sleeve None 9.4 7.5 Open 39 11

115 5.2 1.0 48 ARS2030L Sleeve None 9.9 8.0 TEAO 39 2,11

115 6.2 1.0 56Z GF2031L Sleeve None 9.4 7.5 Open 39 8

115 4.4 1.35 48/56 SC6034A Sleeve Auto 9.4 7.5 Open 104 1,3,11

115 5.9 1.35 48/56 GF2034 Sleeve Auto 9.4 7.5 Open 39 1

230 3.3 1.35 48 GF2038 Sleeve Auto 9.4 7.5 Open 39 9

115/230 6.0/3.0 1.35 48/56 GF2034D Sleeve Auto 9.4 7.5 Open 38 1,9

115/208-230 6.0/3.0 1.35 48/56 BF2034 Ball Auto 9.4 7.5 Open 38 1,7,9

115 5.5 1.35 48 RS2034L Sleeve None 9.4 7.5 Open 39

115 5.5 1.35 48 RB2034 Ball Auto 9.4 7.5 Open 39

115 5.9 1.35 48 RB2034L Ball None 9.4 7.5 Open 39

Notes:

1. 48/56 FR = 1/2” x 1.5” Shaft with 5/8” shaft adapter - 48/56 slotted 3” height base

2. TEAO gasketed conduit box - 3/4” extended thru bolts

3. Energy efficient $ - split phase start/capacitor run

4. 50 cycle only

7. 1/2” extended thru bolts, shaft end

8. 56Z = 1/2” flat x 1.62” shaft, with 56 FR base

9. Suitable for 208V at 1.0 S.F.

10. 48Z = 1/2" flat x 1.88" shaft, with 48 FR base

11. Item to be discontinued when stock is depleted

See page 117 for mounting dimensions

Shaft Dimensions

48 = 1/2” Flat x 1-5/8”

56 = 5/8” Keyed x 1-7/8”

EERE-2007-BT-STD-0007 COMMENT 30
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the financial
statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                         MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                   107,334
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                          1,117,760
<ALLOWANCES>                              10,000
<INVENTORY>                            1,813,506
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       3,307,939
<PP&E>                                    79,482
<DEPRECIATION>                            14,338
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         4,970,151
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  1,109,497
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                  550
<COMMON>                                     389
<OTHER-SE>                             3,359,715
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           4,970,151
<SALES>                                9,150,739
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       9,150,739
<CGS>                                  4,357,209
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          4,357,209
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          1577
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (496,842)
<INCOME-TAX>                            (87,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (409,842)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                           (409,842)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (.12)
        


</TABLE>
No. 11-9910.

#### Miller *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Exhibit 23.2



                         Independent Auditor's Consent

We have issued our report dated January 23, 2002,  accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of International
DisplayWorks,  Inc. (formally Granite Bay Technologies,  Inc. and earlier Morrow
Snowboards,  Inc.) on Form 10-K for the year ended  October 31, 2001.  We hereby
consent to the  incorporation  by reference  of said report in the  Registration
Statement of International  DisplayWorks,  Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-87296,
effective May 1, 2002) pertaining to the 2000 Employee Equity Incentive Plan and
Stock Option  Agreements,  Form S-8 (File No. 333-87298,  effective May 1, 2002)
pertaining  to the 1999 Stock  Option Plan for  Non-Employee  Directors  and the
Morrow  Snowboards,  Inc.  1990  Equity  Incentive  Plan and Form S-8  (File No.
333-04761,  effective May 30, 1996)  pertaining to the Morrow  Snowboards,  Inc.
Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors and related Prospectuses.




/S/ PERRY-SMITH LLP

Sacramento, California
January 29, 2003
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

671 

CA 12-00131 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

SALVATORE J. LICARI, ALSO KNOWN AS SAM LICARI, 

ANNA LICARI AND LICARI FAMILY HOLDINGS LLC, 

PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, 

V ORDER

NEW YORK CENTRAL MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, 

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

LAW OFFICE OF KEITH D. MILLER, LIVERPOOL (KEITH D. MILLER OF COUNSEL),

FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

GUSTAVE J. DETRAGLIA, JR., UTICA (MICHELE E. DETRAGLIA OF COUNSEL),

FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court,

Oneida County (Samuel D. Hester, J.), entered April 6, 2011 in a

breach of contract action. The judgment, among other things, denied

defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’

complaint. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision

at Supreme Court.

Entered: June 8, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Hillsborough,

No. 4520.

#### Lillian Borthwick *v.*John Poell, *Ex’r.*

Submitted October 2, 1956.

Decided November 29, 1956.

*Broderick & Broderick*for the plaintiff, furnished no brief.

*Wiggin, Nourie, Sundeen, Nassikas & Pingree*for the defendant, furnished no brief.

Lampeón, J.

On May 1, 1951, the decedent, John Jobst began to board and room in plaintiff’s home and did so until September 2, 1952, a few days before his death. Plaintiff cleaned his room, fixed his meals, did his mending, washing and ironing and took care of him on two different occasions when he was ill. She testified it was agreed between them that she was to receive therefor $15 per week to be paid to her in a lump sum at John’s death or at the end of 1952 and that she has not been paid.

*366In her specifications she claimed $982 for board, room and care for 491 days at the rate of $2 per day, plus $15 for additional expenses, a total of $997. Her claim was submitted both on an express contract and in *quantum, meruit. Dedes*v. *Dedes,*93 N. H. 215.

It was uncontradicted that the services for which payment is sought were rendered. There being no family relationship existing between the parties *(Johnson*v. *Johnson,*99 N. H. 392) the evidence warranted a finding of an express contract or of an implied mutual understanding that these services were to be paid for by John Jobst. *Yeaton*v. *Skillings,*100 N. H. 316.

There was evidence however that on May 1, 1951, when John Jobst took up residence in plaintiff’s home he had a savings account with a balance of $4,325 in one bank and an account in another bank. Withdrawals averaging $338 were made from these accounts every month that he lived at plaintiff’s home. Defendant testified that John “never owed any money” and that when he lived at the defendant’s home for six years preceding 1949 he paid him each week. Defendant also testified that when he requested the plaintiff for John’s bank book when he was taken ill "there was no discussion on the issue” of John owing her money.

This evidence was sufficient to support a verdict for defendant. Although there was evidence that John might have spent his money otherwise instead of using it to pay plaintiff, a verdict for her was not compelled. *Cf. Elwell*v. *Roper,*72 N. H. 254, 256.

The main question in controversy was whether plaintiff had been paid for her services. Deceased’s bank books showing assets which he possessed during the period in question as well as withdrawals made therefrom were properly admitted on that issue. *Blake*v. *Lord,*90 N. H. 42, 45.

Plaintiff’s motion to set aside the verdict was properly denied and there being no further exceptions of merit appearing, the order is

*Judgment for the defendant.*

All concurred.
**Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONS     I, Eric P. Graap, certify that:          1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fauquier Bankshares, Inc.;          2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;          3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;          4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and          5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.         Date: August 12, 2005    /s/ Eric P. Graap             Eric P. Graap      Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I,
Agustin Gomez de Segura, President and Chief Executive Officer of Cigma Metals
Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
            The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30,
      2007 which this certification accompanies fully complies with the
      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934: and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








Date:
            February 17, 2010
            BY:
            /s/ Agustin Gomez de
  SeguraAgustin
      Gomez de SeguraPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer







This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Case 16-25207 Doc 41 Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/29/16 08:19:15 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1