alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 16-26219 Doc 7 Filed 08/16/16 Entered 08/16/16 11:37:40 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-26219 Doc 7 Filed 08/16/16 Entered 08/16/16 11:37:40 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)**

          I, Eric P. Graap, as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Fauquier Bankshares, Inc., certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Fauquier Bankshares, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.

| Dated: May 14, 2004 | /s/ Eric P. Graap                                              |
|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                |                                                                |
|                | Eric P. GraapSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Fauquier Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by Fauquier Bankshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6673

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RICARDO M. SUGGS, JR.,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, 

Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:06-cr-00027-FPS-DJJ-1; 5:09-cv00057-FPS-DJJ)

Submitted: September 27, 2011 Decided: September 29, 2011

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ricardo M. Suggs, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. David J. Perri, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Ricardo M. Suggs, Jr. seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 

2011) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record 

and conclude that Suggs has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
Argued Feb. 2,

decided April 13, 1909;

rehearing denied May 17, 1910.

#### DIXON *v.*WARNER VALLEY STOCK CO.

[101 Pac. 189.]

From Lake: HENRY L. BENSON, Judge.

Statement by Mr. Justice Slater.

Plaintiff, S. Dixon, filed a cross-bill in equity to an action in ejectment, brought by the defendant, the Warner Valley Stock Company, a corporation, against plaintiff to recover the possession of the N. 14 of the S. E. and lots 5 and 8 of section 7, township 40 S., range 24 E., W. M., containing 163.02 acres of land in Lake County, of this State. The pleading and the facts upon which the *365case is based, except as hereinafter noted, are substantially the same as those stated in the case of *Morrow*v. *Warner Valley Stock Company,*56 Or. 312 (101 Pac. 171), with which this case was consolidated, by stipulation of the parties, for the purpose of trial in the lower , court and in this court. The decree awarded the land to "the defendant, and dismissed the bill for want of equity, from which plaintiff has appealed.

Reversed.

For appellants there was a brief over the names of *Mr. Andrew M. Crawford, Mr. John H. Hall*and *Mr. Edward B. Watson,*with oral arguments by *Mr. Crawford*and *Mr. Watson.*

For respondents there was a brief over the names of *Messrs. Coovert & Stapleton*and *Mr. Charles A. Cogswell,*with an oral argument by *Mr. Elmer E. Coovert.*

Mr. Justice Slater

delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiff settled upon the land on September 6, 1886, resided upon and cultivated the same until January 15, 1889, when he regularly made entry at the local land office, paying all fees and excess charges, and obtaining his first receipt, No. 1,166. Thereafter he resided upon and cultivated the same for the' full period required by the homestead law, building a house and barn, and making other improvements, such as farming the land and building corrals, and he continued to reside upon, occupy, and farm this land until the trial of the case. He made no final proof because of the contest initiated by the State in 1889, which continued in different forms until all similar contests were combined in the case of *Morrow et al.*v. *State of Oregon,*which was decided in favor of the State, March 16, 1903 (32 Land Dec. Dep. Int. 54), and resulting in the cancellation of plaintiff’s entry May 9, 1903. The slight variation of the facts from those in the case of *Morrow*v. *Warner Valley Stock Co.,*56 Or. 312 (101 Pac. 171), is not such as to vary the application of the *366legal principles there announced, which aret conclusive here.

The decree of the lower court will be reversed, and one entered here declaring the plaintiff to be the equitable owner of the land described, and that defendant holds the legal title subject to plaintiff’s equity, and require the defendant to convey the legal title to plaintiff by proper deed, executed by its officers, within 90 days from the filing of the mandate in the court below, or in default thereof this decree stand as such conveyance.

Further prosecution is perpetually enjoined.

Reversed.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21I0026. THE STATE v. NEEL DILLIP PATEL.1

In this criminal proceeding, the State has filed an application for interlocutory

review, seeking to appeal the trial court’s order denying the State’s motion to dismiss

the defendant’s motions to suppress and in limine as both untimely and insufficient

in content. We lack jurisdiction.

The State’s right to appeal in criminal cases is limited by statute. See OCGA

§ 5-7-1; State v. Outen, 289 Ga. 579, 580 (714 SE2d 581) (2011); Ritter v. State, 269

Ga. 884, 885 (2) (506 SE2d 857) (1998). “If the State attempts an appeal outside the

ambit of OCGA § 5-7-1 (a), the appellate courts do not have jurisdiction to entertain

it.” Outen, 289 Ga. at 580 (punctuation omitted). Although the State is authorized to

appeal orderssuppressing or excluding evidence under OCGA § 5-7-1 (a) (4) and (5),

the order that the State seeksto appeal here neither suppresses nor excludes evidence.

And while the State asserts that this Court has jurisdiction over this appeal under

OCGA § 5-7-2 (a), thatstatute does not change our jurisdiction under OCGA § 5-7-1,

but rather simply requires the State to obtain a certificate of immediate review from

the trial court to appeal certain non-final orders.

1

 Patel’s first name also is spelled “Neal” in the application materials.

September 08, 2020
Consequently, because the trial court’s order denying the State’s motion to

dismiss the defendant’s motions to suppress and in limine is outside the ambit of

OCGA § 5-7-1 (a), this application is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

09/08/2020
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
      OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Interactive Intelligence, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Stephen R. Head, Chief Financial Officer, Vice President of Finance and
      Administration, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section
      13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The 
      information  contained  in the  Report  fairly 
      presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of
      operations of the Company.








/s/
      Stephen R. Head


Stephen
      R. Head


Chief
      Financial Officer, Vice President of Finance and Administration, Secretary
      and
      Treasurer


(Principal
      Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)


November
      14, 2005
§ 18.12 Prohibited importation. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in subparts C and D of this part 18, it is unlawful for any person to import any marine mammal or marine mammal product into the United States.
( b ) Regardless of whether an importation is otherwise authorized pursuant to subparts C and D of this part 18, it is unlawful for any person to import into the United States any: ( 1 ) Marine mammal: ( i ) Taken in violation of the Act, or
( ii ) Taken in another country in violation of the laws of that country;
( 2 ) Any marine mammal product if: ( i ) The importation into the United States of the marine mammal from which such product is made would be unlawful under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, or
( ii ) The sale in commerce of such product in the country of origin of the product is illegal.
( c ) Except in accordance with an exception referred to in subpart C and §§ 18.31 and 18.32 of this part, it is unlawful to import into the United States any: ( 1 ) Marine mammal which was pregnant at the time of taking;
( 2 ) Marine mammal which was nursing at the time of taking, or less than 8 months old, whichever occurs later;
( 3 ) Specimen of an endangered or threatened species of marine mammals;
( 4 ) Specimen taken from a depleted species or stock of marine mammals; or
( 5 ) Marine mammal taken in an inhumane manner.
( d ) It is unlawful to import into the United States any fish, whether fresh, frozen, or otherwise prepared, if such fish was caught in a manner proscribed by the Secretary of Commerce for persons subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, whether or not any marine mammals were in fact taken incident to the catching of the fish.
§ 90.445 Form of station records. ( a ) Station records shall be kept in an orderly manner, and in such detail that the data required are readily available. Key letters or abbreviations may be used if proper meaning or explanation is set forth in the record.
( b ) Each entry in the records of each station shall be signed by a person qualified to do so, having actual knowledge of the facts to be recorded.
( c ) No record or portion thereof shall be erased, obliterated, or wilfully destroyed within the required retention period. Any necessary correction may be made only by the person originating the entry, who shall strike out the erroneous portion, initial the correction made, and indicate the date of correction.
#### § 20.24 Daily limit.

No person shall take in any 1 calendar day, more than the daily bag limit or aggregate daily bag limit, whichever applies.

[38 FR 22021, Aug. 15, 1973, as amended at 38 FR 22626, Aug. 23, 1973]
#### § 216.83 Importation of birds or mammals.

No mammals or birds, except household cats, canaries and parakeets, shall be imported to the Pribilof Islands without the permission of an authorized representative of the National Marine Fisheries Service.

[41 FR 49488, Nov. 9, 1976. Redesignated at 61 FR 11750, Mar. 22, 1996]
# Cherrnours

November 17, 2015 

## RECEIVED OPPT CIJ!C 

## 2015NOV

## 24 AM G: IS The Chemours Company Fluoroproducts 67 Canal Road, P. 0. Box 9001 Chambers Works

w Pedersen Building Deepwater, NJ 08023

Certified Mail- Return Receipt Requested 7015 0640 0005 9657 6517 CBIC Control Number

Director, Chemical Control Division US Environmental ProtectionAgency Office ofPollutionPrevention and Toxics EPAEast Room4146 1201 ConstitutionAvenue, NW Washington, DC 20004


### RE: EPA- HQ- OPPT- 2003- 0012 RECEIVED 

## DEC 0·8 2015
EPADOCKET CENTER



### Chemours Chambers Worl•s NJPDES PermitNo. NJ0005100 PFOA Data Submittal- OutfallDSN662 Weekly Grab Samples October 2015 Sample Data
Dear Chemical Control Division: 

# 367056

Attachedplease find summaries ofPFOA analytical results for the Chemours Chambers Works weekly grab samples taken atintemal outfall DSN662A in October 2015.
In accordance withthe current siteNJPDES permit (NJOOOSl00, effective September 2011), these results are provided to NJDEP on a monthlybasis via electronic discharge monitoringrepmts. The enclosures include two paper and two electronic copies ofthe analytical results from this monitoringperiod.
NJDEP has asked The Chemours Company FC, LLC to analyze for and report monthly Spot 662 PFNA concentrations for thenext 12 months. The fourth ofthe requested 12 samples is repotted in the attached table

.**...__~,"t** T. Northey Site vironmental Manager Chemours Chambers Works

EnclosuresAnalvte PFOA PFNA

I 

### ' Sample ID Date Top (ft) Total (T)/ Bottom (It) units Diss. (D) Duplicate# ug/L T ug/L T Summary ofAnalytical Results 662

- October2015

662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 10/5/15 10/12/15 10/19/15 10/26/15 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 3.81 3.06 2.57 2.51

NA NA 0.234 NAi •, PFNA = Perfluorononanoic Acid PFOA = PerfluorooctanoicAcid ug/L = micrograms per Liter ug/L =micrograms per liter or parts per billion (ppb) LOQ

- limit ofquantification = 0.100 ug/L NA = not analyzed j_ J Samples were analyzed by Critical Path Services LLC. Reported results represent a single analysis, except for the sample collected on 10/19/15. Acceptable precision was obtained and the reported results for the sample collected on 10/19/15 represent the average of lab duplicate results. i I I I l j_ The NJDEP lab certification numberfor Critical Path Services LLC is PA072. I I I I I

< and ND = Non detect at stated reporting limit Page 1 of 1 cwk 662 grab results_oct15.xls:Sheet1 11/17/2015 12:54 PMCopyto:

Document Control Office US Environmental ProtectionAgency Office ofPollution Prevention and Toxics EPAEast Room 6428 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC20460
Ms. Heather Genievich (cover letter only) NJDEP Division ofWater Quality Bureau ofSurface Water Permitting Mail Code 401-02B 401 E. State Street P.O. Box420 Trenton,NJ 08625-0420
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 181 (Tuesday, September 19, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 54868]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7762]



[[Page 54868]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Advisory Committee on Prosthetics and Special Disabilities 
Programs; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that a meeting of the 
Advisory Committee on Prosthetics and Special Disabilities Programs 
will be held October 3-4, 2006, in Room 230, VA Central Office, 810 
Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. The meeting will convene at 8:30 
a.m. on both days. On October 3, it will adjourn at 4:30 p.m., and on 
October 4 at 12 noon. The meeting is open to the public.
    The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs on VA's prosthetic programs designed to provide state-of-the-
art prosthetics and the associated rehabilitation research, 
development, and evaluation of such technology. The Committee also 
provides advice to the Secretary on special disability programs which 
are defined as any program administered by the Secretary to serve 
veterans with spinal cord injury, blindness or vision impairment, loss 
of or loss of the use of extremities, deafness or hearing impairment, 
or other serious incapacities in terms of daily life functions.
    There will be presentations by various Veterans Health 
Administration officials throughout the meeting. On the morning of 
October 3, the Committee will be briefed by the Chief Consultant, 
Rehabilitation Services, and the Director, Physical Medicine and 
Rehabilitation. In the afternoon, there will be briefings from the 
Director of Ophthalmology and Optometry, and the Chief Prosthetics and 
Clinical Logistics Officer. On the morning of October 4, the Committee 
will be briefed by the Chief Research and Development Officer.
    No time will be allocated for receiving oral presentations from the 
public. However, members of the public may direct questions or submit 
written statements for review by the Committee in advance for the 
meeting to Ms. Cynthia Wade, Designated Federal Officer, Veterans 
Health Administration, Patient Care Services, Rehabilitation Services 
(117), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20420. Any member of the public wishing to attend the 
meeting should contact Ms. Wade at (202) 273-8485.

    Dated: September 12, 2006.
    By direction of the Secretary.
E. Philip Riggin,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 06-7762 Filed 9-18-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 175 (Monday, September 11, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 53488]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7524]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Research, Engineering and Development Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to section 10(A)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463; 5 U.S.C. App. 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting 
of the FAA Research, Engineering and Development (R,E&D) Advisory 
Committee.
    Name: Research, Engineering and Development Advisory Committee
    Time and Date: September 20--9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Place: Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, 
SW.--Bessie Coleman Room, Washington, DC 20591.
    Purpose: The meeting agenda will include receiving from the 
Committee guidance for FAA's research and development investments in 
the areas of air traffic services, airports, aircraft safety, human 
factors and environment and energy. We will also receive 
recommendations from the Separation Standards Working Group. Attendance 
is open to the interested public but seating is limited. Persons 
wishing to attend the meeting or obtain information should contact 
Gloria Dunderman at (202) 267-8937 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0a6d666578636b246e7f646e6f78676b644a6c6b6b246d657c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b4d3d8dbc6ddd59ad0c1dad0d1c6d9d5daf4d2d5d59ad3dbc2">[email protected]</span></a>. 
Attendees will have to present picture ID at the security desk and 
escorted to the Bessie Coleman Room.
    Members of the public may present a written statement to the 
Committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC on September 5, 2006.
John D. Rekstad,
Program Director, Research Planning Division.
[FR Doc. 06-7524 Filed 9-8-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 95.339 Operation of transmitter with external device causing rule violation prohibited.

No person shall operate any Personal Radio Service transmitter to which an external device or accessory has been added such that operation of the combination results in a violation of the rules.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 176 (Tuesday, September 12, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 53677]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7589]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Contract Audit Agency


Membership of the Defense Contract Audit Agency Senior Executive 
Service Performance Review Boards

AGENCY: Defense Contract Audit Agency, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of Membership of the Defense Contract Audit Agency 
Senior Executive Service Performance Review Boards.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the appointment of members to the 
Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) Performance Review Boards. The 
Performance Review Boards provide fair and impartial review of Senior 
Executive Service (SES) performance appraisals and make recommendations 
to the Director, Defense Contract Audit Agency, regarding final 
performance ratings and performance awards for DCAA SES members.

DATES: Effective Date: September 12, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rita Blakeslee, Chief, Human Resources 
Management Division, Defense Contract Audit Agency, 8725 John J. 
Kingman Road, Suite 2135, Fort Belvoir, Virginia 22060-6219, (703) 767-
1236.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), the 
following are the names and titles of DCAA career executives appointed 
to serve as members of the DCAA Performance Review Boards. Appointees 
will serve one-year terms effective upon publication of this notice.

Headquarters Performance Review Board

    Mr. Joseph Garcia, Assistant Director, Operations, DCAA, 
chairperson.
    Mr. Ken Saceoccia, Assistant Director, Policy and Plans, DCAA, 
member.
    Mr. John Farenish, General Counsel, DCAA, Member.

Regional Performance Review Board

    Mr. Michael Steen, Regional Director, MidAtlantic Region, DCAA, 
chairperson.
    Mr. Ed Nelson, Regional Director, Northeastern Region, DCAA, 
member.
    Mr. Paul Phillips, Regional Director, Eastern Region, member.

    Dated: September 5, 2006.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 06-7589 Filed 9-11-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
No. 11-5204.

#### Lang *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.