# APPENDIX 17A. REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS SUPPORTING

MATERIAL

TABLE OF CONTENTS

17A.1 BACKGROUND ON MARKET PENETRATION CURVES DEVELOPED

BY XENERGY..................................................................................................... 17A-1

17A.2 UTILITY REBATE PROGRAMS FOR COMMERCIAL CLOTHES

WASHERS AND RESIDENTIAL DISHWASHERS ......................................... 17A-2

17A.2.1 Rebate Programs for Commercial Clothes Washers............................................. 17A-3

17A.2.2 Rebate Programs for Residential Dishwashers..................................................... 17A-5

17A.3 DEVELOPMENT OF CONSUMER TAX CREDITS IMPACT ANALYSIS.... 17A-9

17A.4 EPACT 2005 FEDERAL TAX CRE DIT LEVELS FOR RESIDENTIAL

APPLIANCES AND APPLIANC E MANUFACTURERS ............................... 17A-11

17A.4.3 Residential Appliances........................................................................................ 17A-11

17A.4.4 Energy Efficient Appliance Cr edits for Manufacturers...................................... 17A-11

LIST OF TABLES

Table 17A.2.1 Rebate Programs for Co mmercial Clothes Washers................................. 17A-4

Table 17A.2.2 Rebate Programs for Residential Dishwashers......................................... 17A-6

LIST OF FIGURE

Figure 17A.1.1 Comparison of Exponential and L ogistic Curves Showing External and

Internal Influences on Consumers ............................................................ 17A-2

17A-i

# APPENDIX 17A. REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS SUPPORTING MATERIAL

17A.1 BACKGROUND ON MARKET PENETR ATION CURVES DEVELOPED BY

XENERGY

Xenergy, Inc. developed a re-parameteri zed, mixed-source information diffusion model

to estimate market impacts induced by financial incentives for energy-efficient appliances. The

basic premise of this mixed-source model is that information diffus ion drives technology

adoption.

There is extensive economic literature on the diffusi on process of new products as

technologies evolve. Some of the literature focu ses primarily on the deve lopment of analytical

models of diffusion patterns of new products for indivi dual consumers or for technologies from

competing firms. 1



# , 2



# , 3 

# One study records researchers’ attemp ts to investigate underlying factors

that drive diffusion processes. 4 

# Because of the distinct characteristics of diverse new products,

few studies have conclusively developed a universally-applicable model. Some key findings,

however, have seemed to gain wide recognition in academia and industry.

First, new technologies may not be adopted by all potential users, regardless of their

economic benefits and technological merits. Ther efore, a ceiling on the adoption rate exists for

many products. Second, not all adopters purcha se new products at the same time; some act

earlier after the introduction of a new product, while others respond slowly, waiting for products

to become more mature. Third, diffusion pro cesses can be approximately characterized by

asymmetric S-curves, depicting three stages of diffusion: starting, accel erating, and decreasing

as the adoption ceili ng is being reached.

An important diffusion model, the epidemic model , is widely used in marketing and

social studies on diffusion. It assumes that a) consumers value the be nefits of a new product

identically and b) the cost of a new product is constant or de clines monotonically over time.

What induces a consumer to purchase the new pr oduct is information about the availability and

the benefits of the product. In other words, it is information diffusion that drives new product

adoption by individual consumers. 3 

# The model incorporates in formation diffusion from both

internal sources (news spread by word of mouth from early adopters) and external sources (the

“announcement effect” by government, other instit utions, or commercial advertising) by

superimposing a logistic functi on with an exponential function. 1,4



# The relative degree of influence by internal or external sources determines the general

shape of the diffusion curv e of a specific product. 1,4 

# For instance, if the adoption of one

particular product is more in fluenced by external sources of information diffusion

(announcement effect) than by internal source s (word of mouth among earlier adopters to

prospective adopters), the rate of diffusion at the beginning st age of the diffusion process is

much higher. This reflects the immediate in formation exposure to a significant number of

17A-1

# prospective adopters brought about by external sources, in contrast to the more gradual exposure

to internal sources such as news propagation by earlier adopters, a small proportion of the

population, to other prospective adopters. Graphi cally speaking, a relatively dominant external

source of information diffusion gives an immediat e jump-start to the adoption of a new product

in the first years, forming a concave curve with respect to the Y axis (see the exponential curve

in Figure A.1). Adoption of a new product with a stronger influence by internal sources of

information diffusion (such as a socially-tighten ed network formed by pr ospective adopters) may

start with a few early ad opters and gradually increas e as the number of a dopters grows, and thus

form a convex curve (see the logistic curve in Figure 17A.1.1).

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

0 5 10 15 20 25 30



# YearMarket Penetration 

# Logistic Function Modified Exponential Function



# External Influence

Internal Influence



# Figure 17A.1.1 Comparison of Exponential and Logistic Curves Showing External

and Internal Influences on Consumers

17A.2 UTILITY REBATE PROGRAMS FOR COMMERCIAL CLOTHES

WASHERS AND RESIDE NTIAL DISHWASHERS

The following two tables present a summ ary of rebate program amounts offered

throughout the U.S. for commerci al clothes washers and for residential dishwashers.

17A-2

# 17A.2.1 Rebate Programs for Commercial Clothes Washers

DOE found 24 agencies with programs for commer cial clothes washers. Rebates for this

product have been offered by electric utilities, gas utilities, water utilities, and municipal and

regional agencies. These entities offer reba tes for commercial clothes washers meeting

efficiency criteria that usually match those set by ENERGY STAR or the Consortium for Energy

Efficiency. In some areas customers can re ceive rebates from both their energy and water

utilities. Table 17A.2.1 shows the agency names, States, rebate amounts, and program websites.

Multiple entries in the table indicat e either that an agency offers two rebate amounts (i.e., one for

customers with gas water heaters and another for those with electric water heaters) or that the

agency is an umbrella for several rebate prog rams. The average rebate amount is a simple

average of the wide range of all of the entr ies (rather than being population-weighted).

17A-3Table 17A.2.1Rebate Programs for Commercial Clothes WashersUtility or AgencyStateAmountWebsiteAlliant EnergyIA$100http://alliantenergy.com/docs/groups/public/documents/pub/p015218.hcspCPUC LightWash (former)CA$450http://www.cuwcc.org/Uploads/annual_reports/FY2003/Annual_Report_2003.pdfLADWPCA$430http://www.ladwp.com/ladwp/cms/ladwp001820.jspSoCalGas, SCECA$210http://www.mwdsaveabuck.com/multifamily.htmlSDG&E (Sempra)CA$75http://sdge.com/residential/PY2006-08MFapplication.pdfBAWSCA (Bay Area)CA$220https://www.conservationrebates.com/programs/cop/CoinOp.aspxContra Costa County Water District/PG&ECA$220http://www.ccwater.com/conserve/rebates_cwasher.aspSFPUCCA$150http://www.friendlyplumber.com/plumbing101/commercialwasherrebate.html$200EBMUDCA$150http://www.ebmud.com/conserving_&_recycling/non_residential/clotheswasher_rebate/default.htm$250Silicon Valley PowerCA$350http://www.siliconvalleypower.com/bus/?sub=rebatewashCity of AustinTX$250http://www.ci.austin.tx.us/watercon/cwasher.htm$100Seattle Public UtilitiesWA$100http://www.savingwater.org/business_laundryrebate.htm$125$50http://www.savingwater.org/inside_laundry_washwise.htm$75$100BPA$180http://www.bpa.gov/Energy/N/projects/post2006conservation/manual/$75PG&ECA$35http://www.pge.com/includes/docs/pdfs/application/07App_GI.pdf$75EBMUDCA$150http://www.ebmud.com/conserving_&_recycling/non_residential/clotheswasher_rebate/default.htm$250Riverside Public UtilitiesCA$75http://www.riversideca.gov/utilities/busi-energystar.aspAlbuquerque Water Utility AuthorityNM$100http://www.abcwua.org/pdfs/Washer%20Rebate.pdfMarin CountyCA$50www.marinwater.orgHelix Water District (San Diego)CA$300Truckee Donner PUDCA$100http://www.tdpud.org/index.php?cId=34Energy Trust of OregonOR$225http://www.energytrust.org/residential/mf/clotheswashers.html$180Puget Sound EnergyWA$200http://www.pse.com/solutions/forbusiness/pages/comRebates.aspx?tab=4&chapter=2Seattle Water UtilityWA$300http://www.savingwater.org/business_WSTP.htm#financialNumber of Agencies24Average Rebate Amount$174Rebate Percent of Incremental Cost31%Websites last accessed January, 2008.17A-4

# 17A.2.2 Rebate Programs for Residential Dishwashers

DOE found 88 agencies with programs for resi dential dishwashers. Rebates for this

product have been offered by electric utilities, gas utilities, and municipal and regional agencies.

These entities offer rebates for dishwashers meeti ng efficiency criteria that usually match those

set by ENERGY STAR or the Consortium for Energy Efficiency. Table 17A.2.2 shows the

agency names, States, rebate amounts, and progr am websites. Multiple entries in the table

indicate that an agency offers two rebate amounts, one for cust omers with gas water heaters and

another for those with electric wa ter heaters. The aver age rebate amount is a simple average of

the wide range of all of the entries.

17A-5Table 17A.2.2Rebate Programs for Residential DishwashersUtility or AgencyStateAmountWebsiteCity of RosevilleCA$25http://www.conservationrebates.com/programs/REC/AppliancesProgram.aspxAspen CORECO$75http://www.aspencore.org/sitepages/pid46.php#washerFort Collins UtilitiesCO$25http://fcgov.com/water/washer-rebate.phpHoly Cross EnergyCO$25http://www.holycross.com/$75Longmont PowerCO$50http://www.ci.longmont.co.us/lpc/index.htmGroton UtilitiesCT$60http://www.grotonutilities.com/elec_conserv_resident_appliance.aspKootenai ElectricID$25http://www.kec.com/rebates.phpRocky Mountain PowerID, UT$20http://www.homeenergysavings.net/idaho/dishwashers.htmlLinn County RECIA$50http://www.linncountyrec.com/cgi-script/csarticles/articles/000003/000334.htmMaquoketa Valley RECIA$25http://www.mvec.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=20&Itemid=23#starEastern Iowa RECIA$25http://www.easterniowa.com/East-Central RECIA$25http://www.ecirec.coop/prod_serv/rebates.shtmlTIP RECIA$35http://www.tiprec.com/rebates.htmlConsumers EnergyIA$25http://www.consumersenergy.coop/residential/products_services/incentives/index.htmlGuthrie County RECIA$25http://www.guthrie-rec.coop/cgi-script/csArticles/articles/000000/000049.htmFarmers RECIA$25http://www.farmersrec.com/Promotions.htmSouthwest Iowa RECIA$25http://www.swiarec.coop/prod_serv/rebates.shtmlClarke ECIA$25http://www.cecnet.net/rebates.htmlChicopee Electric LightMA$50http://www.celd.com/news.php?id=36Concord Muni Light PlantMA$50http://www.concordma.gov/pages/ConcordMA_LightPlant/applianceMansfield Muni Elec Dep'tMA$75http://www.mansfieldelectric.com/rebateBrochure/billingForm.htmlMarblehead Light Dep'tMA$25http://www.marbleheadelectric.com/rebate.htmMarblehead Light Dep'tMA$50http://www.marbleheadelectric.com/rebate.htmNorth Attleboro ElectricMA$30http://www.dsireusa.org/library/includes/incentivesearch.cfm?Incentive_Code=MA61F&Search=TableType&type=Rebate&CurrentPageID=7&EE=1&RE=1Reading Muni Light Dep'tMA$50http://www.rmld.com/rebates.htmShrewsbury ElectricMA$50http://www.shrewsbury-ma.gov/light/rebates.aspWakefield Gas & LightMA$50http://www.wakefield.ma.us/Public_Documents/WakefieldMA_MGLD/rcsprogram.htmLincoln Electric Co-OpMT$10http://www.lincolnelectric.coop/energy_star_rebates.htmCity of AnaheimCA$50http://www.anaheim.net/article.asp?id=992Burbank Water and PowerCA$75http://www.burbankwaterandpower.com/homerewards.htmlPG&ECA$30http://www.pge.com/res/rebates/dishwashers/index.html$50SDG&E (Sempra)CA$30http://www.sdge.com/residential/singleFamilyRebate/docs/rebateOverview.pdfSouthern California GasCA$30http://www.socalgas.com/residential/savemoney/instant.shtml,City of LompocCA$50http://www.cityoflompoc.com/splash/utilprograms.htmGlendale Waterand PowerCA$40http://www.glendalewaterandpower.com/smart_home_saving_rebates.asp17A-6Utility or AgencyStateAmountWebsiteHercules Municipal UtilityCA$50http://www.dsireusa.org/library/includes/incentivesearch.cfm?Incentive_Code=CA133F&Search=TableType&type=Rebate&CurrentPageID=7&EE=1&RE=1IID EnergyCA$50http://www.dsireusa.org/library/includes/incentivesearch.cfm?Incentive_Code=CA97F&Search=TableType&type=Rebate&CurrentPageID=7&EE=1&RE=1Lassen MUDCA$35http://www.lmud.org/rebate.htmLodi Electric UtilityCA$25http://www.lodielectric.com/residential/rebateoffer.php?id=2City of Palo AltoCA$50http://www.cityofpaloalto.org/depts/utl/news/details.asp?NewsID=65&TargetID=12Plumas Sierra Rural ElectricCoopCA$35http://www.psln.com/energy_rebates.php?sec=enersol&pag=enerrebRedding Electric UtilityCA$25http://www.reupower.com/energysvc/energy-rebates.aspRiverside Public UtilitiesCA$50http://www.riversideca.gov/utilities/resi-energystar.aspSMUDCA$30http://www.smud.org/rebates/index.html$50Truckee Donner PUDCA$100http://www.tdpud.org/index.php?cId=34City of GridleyCA$25http://www.gridley.ca.us/documents/appliancerebateapp.pdfImperial Irrigation DistrictqCA$50http://www.iid.com/Media/PubRebApp-En_WEB07b.pdfHawaiian Electric CompanyHI$50http://www.heco.com/portal/site/heco/menuitem.508576f78baa14340b4c0610c510b1ca/?vgnextoid=a2670c0ed85b2110VgnVCM1000005c011bacRCRD&vgnextchannel=6558f2b154da9010VgnVCM10000053011bacRCRD&vgnextfmt=default&vgnextrefresh=1&level=0&ct=article#mainContent%20idKauai Island Utility CooperativeHI$50http://www.kiuc.coop/co-opportunities/index.htmBlachly Lane, EugeneOR$5http://www.northwestenergystar.com/index.php?cID=183&searchType=state&state=OR&type%5B%5D=Dishwashers&slSearch=searchCentral Electric, RedmondOR$25AshlandOR$30OR$60BandonOR$50Columbia River PUD, St. HelensOR$25Consumers Power, PhilomathOR$20Douglas EC, RoseburgOR$30Emerald, EugeneOR$25Eugene Water and ElectricOR$20Forest GroveOR$30Milton FreewaterOR$15MonmouthOR$15Salem ElectricOR$60TillamookOR$25Wasco, The DallesOR$25CheneyWA$21$24ChewelahWA$10017A-7Utility or AgencyStateAmountWebsiteMason County PUD #3, SheltonWA$25Mason County PUD #1, SheltonWA$60Modern Electric, SpokaneWA$22$24Snohomish County, EverettWA$35Okanogan CountyWA$50Coulee DamWA$60Wahkiakum PUD #1,CathlametWA$75DelcoID$15City of RupertID$15East End, RupertID$15Riverside Electric, RupertID$50Soda SpringsID$15Fall River, AshtonID$25Farmers, HeyburnID$15Idaho FallsID$15Northern Lights, SagleID$25Glacier, Cut BankMT$25Lincoln, EurekaMT$10Mission Valley , PabloMT$50Anoka Muni UtilityMN$50http://www.ci.anoka.mn.us/vertical/Sites/%7B213A9A90-C8E1-49AA-AC02-51D3C4882D33%7D/uploads/%7B93715A51-EA59-4213-BD5E-73A264F5E4F2%7D.PDFBuffalo Municipal UtilitiesNY$50http://www.ci.buffalo.mn.us/Utilities/Electric/EnergyRebate.htmBPA$25http://www.bpa.gov/Energy/N/projects/post2006conservation/manual/Number of Agencies88Average Rebate Amount$37Websites last accessed January, 2008.17A-8

# 17A.3 DEVELOPMENT OF CONSUMER T AX CREDITS IMPACT ANALYSIS

Clothes Washers

To analyze the Consumer Tax Credits polic y for commercial clothes washers (CCWs),

DOE studied the Oregon Department of Energy’ s experience with Residential Energy Tax

Credits (RETC) for residential clothes washers (RCWs). DOE chose RCWs because the product

is similar to CCWs, and because the availabl e data on Oregon's Business Energy Tax Credits

(BETC)—which include CCWs—did not disaggregate tax credits claimed by appliance. Also,

the ENERGY STAR program did not have data on CCW shipments.

Note that the RETC efficiency level fo r RCWs is minimum MEF of 2.0 and maximum

water factor of 6.5. The proposed standard level for CCWs is minimum MEF of 2.2 and

maximum water factor of 5.1, which is a stricter level. However, DOE assumed that by 2012

consumer behavior would be similar under a tax credit program aimed at high-efficiency CCW

units.

As stated in the RIA chapter, DOE calculate d that Oregon taxpayers claimed credits for

almost one quarter of Oregon’s total residential clothes washer shipments in 2006. DOE needed

to estimate what portion of those taxpayers cl aiming credits were primarily motivated by the tax

credits themselves, what portion were influenced by utility rebate incentives, and what portion

were "free riders"—those who woul d have purchased efficient appl iances without a tax credit or

rebate incentive but still claimed the tax credit. To attribute the Oregon tax credits claimed to

each of these influences, DOE reviewed a repor t prepared by KEMA on efficient RCWs in the

Northwest. This report studied the penetration of residential clothes washers in Oregon and

Washington, two neighboring states that ha ve utility rebate programs for this product. 5 

# KEMA

made a "highly conservative estimate" that 50 percent of Oregon's ENERGY STAR clothes

washers were “ultra high efficiency” (UHE) a 

# units, based on tax credit data from Oregon

Department of Energy (ODOE). In contrast, KEMA made a "highly conservative estimate" that

15 percent of Washington’s EN ERGY STAR clothes washers were UHE models, based on

rebate data from two utilities in the State. (KEMA also estimated that 19% of the State’s

population was eligible for rebate s.) KEMA’s report attributed the difference in UHE market

share in the two States to the Or egon tax credits. Based on this attribution, DOE estimated that

38 percent of the tax credits claimed were actuall y due to rebates; these represent 9 percent of

total shipments.

To estimate the free riders among the Oregon clothes washer shipments, DOE used the

market penetration of the baseline CCW units on the penetration curve presented in Figure

17.3.6. This penetration was 9.2 percen t of total shipments, which is 38 percent of the number of

tax credit claims. DOE then es timated that the remaining 24 percent of the Oregon clothes

a 

# Units meeting specifications of minimum MEF of 2.20 and maximum WF of 6.5 ( which are also the Oregon tax

credit specifications).



# 17A-9

# washer tax credits claimed for the years 1998–2005 we re attributable to tax credits alone, or 5.8

percent of total shipments.

Dishwashers

For 2006 DOE calculated that Oregon taxpaye rs claimed credits for 14 percent of

Oregon’s total dishwasher shipments. DOE did not find data comparing Oregon and

Washington’s efficient dishwasher sales. To esti mate the portions of these tax credit claims that

were likely due to utili ty rebates and to market impacts, DOE reviewed a report by Itron on

utility rebate programs in California. That repo rt compared the percentage of free riders in

residential clothes washer and di shwasher rebate programs in 2005. 6 

# Itron found that the

penetration rate of ENERGY ST AR dishwashers (85%) was much higher than that of ENERGY

STAR clothes washers (40%). b 

# Itron also found that the percenta ge of free riders was greater for

dishwasher programs than for clot hes washer programs. DOE’s previous estimates showed that

the incremental cost from the baseline was much smaller for high-efficiency dishwashers than

for high-efficiency clothes washers, 7,8 

# which could explain the hi gher penetration rate for

efficient dishwashers; an incentive program for a product whose market share is already high

would tend to have more free riders. Based on th ese various factors, DOE estimated that market

impacts (part of which are due to free riders ) were responsible for a higher percentage of

dishwasher tax credit claims than were market impacts for residential clothes washer tax credit

claims.

Itron’s report contained two estimates of free riders for ENERGY STAR dishwashers for

2005. DOE took the simple average of the suppl ier estimate of 93% in the self-reported

consumer estimate of 59%, yielding 76%. DOE compar ed this to the simple average of free rider

estimates for residential clothes washers, which were 77% from s uppliers and 43% from

consumers, yielding 60%. DOE assumed that the difference in free riders between the two

products would be on the order of the diffe rence between these two estimates (16%).

DOE interpreted the higher percentage of consumers purchasing dishwashers as free

riders and then claiming tax credits, and the lowe r percentage of taxpayers influenced primarily

by rebates, estimating that 49 percent of Or egon's 2006 dishwasher tax credits claimed (6.9

percent of total dishwasher shipments) were due to market impacts. It estimated that utility

rebates were responsible for 32 percent of tax cr edits claimed (4.5 percent of total shipments).

DOE attributed the remaining 20 percent of tax cr edits claimed (2.8 percent of total shipments)

to tax credits.

b 

# Values are from ENERGY STAR website base d on D&R International data by state.



# 17A-10

# 17A.4 EPACT 2005 FEDERAL TAX CREDIT LEVELS FOR RESIDENTIAL

APPLIANCES AND APPLIANCE MANUFACTURERS

17A.4.3 Residential Appliances

The residential appliance Federal tax cr edit qualification sp ecifications are:

• 

# Furnaces and boilers: Annual Fuel Use Efficiency (AFUE) 95 or higher

• 

# Central air conditioning units: highest tier standards set by the Consortium for Energy

Efficiency (CEE), which require a SEER of 15 and an EER of 12.5 for split systems and

SEER 14 and EER 12 for single-package systems.

o 

# Air-source heat pumps must have a HSPF of 9 or greater, SEER 15 or higher, and

EER 13 or higher.

o 

# Ground-source heat pumps must meet the follo wing criteria (the same criteria as

for ENERGY STAR):

 

# Closed-loop systems—14.1 cooling EER and 3.3 COP

 

# Open-loop systems—16.2 EER and 3.6 COP

 

# Direct-expansion systems—15 EER and 3.5 COP. In addition, groundsource heat pumps must in clude a desuperheater (whi ch preheats water for

a water heater) or an integr ated water heating system.

• 

# Fans for heating and cooling systems: fan uses no more than 2 per cent of total heating

system energy use, as defined by DOE test procedure.

• 

# Water heaters:

o 

# Gas or propane water heaters—Energy Factor of at least 0.8. The only models that

meet this standard currently are tankless water heaters and some systems that

combine both space and water heating.

o 

# Heat pump water heaters—Ener gy Factor of at least 2.0

17A.4.4 Energy Efficient Appliance Credits for Manufacturers

Each manufacturer is limited to a total of $75 million for all cred its under this provision.

Of that cap, no more than $20 million can be claimed for the lowest tier of qualifying

refrigerators. The tax credit amounts and criteria for production of energy-efficient appliances

are as follows:

• Clothes washers: $100 for models that meet the 2007 ENERGY STAR © 

# criteria

• Refrigerators (three tiers):

o 

# $75 for models that save at least 15 pe rcent relative to 2001 Federal standards

(same as the current ENERGY STAR criteria); available only in 2006

o 

# $125 for models that save at least 20 pe rcent relative to 2001 Federal standards

o 

# $175 for models that save 25 percent or more relative to 2001 Federal standards

• Dishwashers: $32.31 for models that meet the 2007 ENERGY STAR criteria

17A-11

# REFERENCES

1 

# Geroski, P.A., Models of Technology Diffusion. 2000. Research Policy. 29, 603-625.

2 

# Hall, B. H. and B. Khan. “Adoption of New Technology.” 2003. Working Paper No.E03

-

330. Department of Economics, Univer sity of California, Berkeley, CA.

3 

# Lekvall, P. and C. Wahlbin. “A Study of Some Assumptions Underlying Innovation

Diffusion Functions.” 1973. Sw edish Journal of Economics.

4 

# Van den Bulte, C. “Want to Know How Diffusion Speed Varies Across Countries and

Products? Try a Bass Model.” PDMA Visi on, October 2002. Product Development and

Management Association. XXVI No 4.

5 

# KEMA. Consumer Product Market Progress Evaluation Re port 3. 2007. Prepared for

Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance. Kema, Inc.: Portland, OR. Report #07-174.

6 

# Itron And KEMA. 2004/2005 Statewide Reside ntial Retrofit Single-Family Energy

Efficiency Rebate Evaluation. 2007. Prep ared for The Califor nia Public Utilities

Commission, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, San Diego Gas and Electric Company,

Southern California Edison, and Southern Calif ornia Gas Company. Itron, Inc. and KEMA,

Inc.: Oakland, CA. CPUC-Id#: 1115-04.

7 

# U.S. Department of Energy. Technical Support Document: Ener gy Efficiency Standards for

Consumer Products and Commercial and Industria l Equipment: Residential Dishwashers,

Dehumidifiers, and Cooking Products, and Commercial Clothes Washers , November 2007.

Washington, DC. Chapter 8.

< http://www.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_ standards/residential/home_appl_tsd.html >

8 

# U.S. Department of Energy. Final Rule Technical Support Document (TSD): Energy

Efficiency Standards for Consum er Products: Clothes Washers , December 2000.

Washington, DC. Chapter 7.

< http://www.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_ standards/residential/clwash_0900_r.html >



# 17A-12