alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 80.69 Facilities requirement for public coast stations using telephony. Public coast stations using telephony must be provided with the following facilities. ( a ) When the station is authorized to use frequencies in the 1605-3500 kHz band, equipment meeting the requirements of § 80.67(b) must be installed at each transmitting location.
( b ) The transmitter power on the frequency 2182 kHz must not exceed 50 watts carrier power for normal operation. During distress, urgency and safety traffic, operation at maximum power is permitted.
Exhibit
31.2Certification
of the Chief Financial Officer of Genesis Capital Corporation of Nevadapursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






I,
Christopher Astrom, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this Form 10-Q of Genesis Capital Corporation of Nevada;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:





(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;





(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and





5. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small
business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting.





Date: May
15, 2008








/s/
CHRISTOPHER ASTROM





Christopher
Astrom


Chief
Financial Officer
In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

August 1, 1994.

Resolved, That the House agree to the amendments of

the Senate numbered 1 through 11 to the bill (H.R. 4299)

entitled ‘‘An Act to authorize the transfer of naval vessels to

certain foreign countries.’’.

Resolved, That the House agree to the amendment

of the Senate numbered 12 to the aforesaid bill, with the

following

AMENDMENTS:

1 Ω1æPage 2, beginning on line 13, strike øor any other

2 provision of law¿.

3 Ω2æPage 3, strike line 3 and all that follows through line

4 9.

Attest:

Clerk.
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4299

AMENDMENTS

TO

SENATE AMENDMENTS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           4,224,756
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,651,325
<PP&E>                                           2,136,321
<DEPRECIATION>                                     298,254
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,513,058
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,013,795
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             4,730
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,472,837
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,513,058
<SALES>                                              7,344
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     7,344
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,684,928
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   6,576
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,612,347)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,612,347)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,612,347)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.34)



</TABLE>
No. 11-9563.

#### Hearn *v.*Illinois.

App. Ct. Ill., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 10.3


    Exhibit
      10.3

    
 

    Sales
      Agreement

    


    This
      agreement is entered into by and between the Jiangxi Taina Nanfeng Orange
      Limited (hereinafter called ‘the Jiangxi Taina’) and the Inner Mongolian Menglin
      Fruits Limited (hereinafter called ‘the Menglin Fruits’). 

    Both
      parties have reached the following agreement on selling Nanfeng tangerine orange
      to Russia in 2007, on the basis of the principles of equality, cooperation,
      mutual benefits and win-win results: 

     

    I.
      Distributed brand: to distribute original Taina-branded Nanfeng tangerine
      orange;

     

    II.
      Sales
      volume: 3,000 tons

     

    III.
      Sales price: to deliver the products at an 8%-off prevailing market price;
      

     

    IV.
      Settlement: to make the payment upon the delivery to Manchuria, Inner Mongolia,
      China;

     

    V.
      Right
      of distribution: as a general distributor of tangerine orange to be exported
      to
      Russia;

     

    VI.
      Other
      arrangements: Warm-up facilities have to be utilized in the process of transport
      to ensure no freezing suffered by tangerine orange after arrival;

     

    VII.
      Responsibility of breach: The Jiangxi Taina shall be under penalty of RMB 0.2
      yuan per 500 grams, if the quality of tangerine orange it delivers fails to
      meet
      the requirements of the Yunpeng Fruits; 

     

    
      
        VIII.
          This agreement shall be made in duplicate, each maintaining one of the
          copies,
          and shall come into force since the date when it is signed and sealed by
          both
          parties. 

      

    

    


    Jiangxi
      Taina (Corporate chop) Menglin Fruits (Corporate Chop) 

    


    Signed
      by
      representative:    Signed
      by
      representative: 

    


    


    Date:
      Feb. 8, 2007      Date:
      Feb. 8, 2007
§ 73.4170 Obscene broadcasts. ( a ) See *Miller* v. *California,* 413 U.S.C. 15 (1973). See also *Pope* v. *Illinois,* 107 S.Ct. 1918 (1987). 18 U.S.C. 1464.
( b ) See Memorandum Opinion and Order, MM Docket 83-575, FCC 88-4, adopted January 12, 1988. 3 FCC Rcd 757. See also Memorandum Opinion and Order, MM Docket 83-575, FCC 93-180, adopted April 2, 1993. 8 FCC Rcd 2753.
( c ) See Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 87-365, adopted November 24, 1987. 3 FCC Rcd 930.
( d ) See “Memorandum of Understanding between the Federal Communications Commission and the Department of Justice concerning Complaints and Cases Involving Obscenity and Indecency,” released April 9, 1991. See also News Release dated April 19, 1991.
[59 FR 52087, Oct. 14, 1994]
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interactive Intelligence, Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,  Donald E. Brown, M.D., Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1, fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.








/s/ Donald E. Brown, M.D.


Donald E. Brown, M.D.


President and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)


August 6, 2010
No. 11-9615.

#### Mendoza *v.*California.

Sup. Ct. Cal. Certio-rari denied.
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P184Boston Police Department Enhancing Cultures of Integrity Technical Assistance GuideIn this technical guide, the Boston Police Department explores seven strategies to strengthen its integrity and accountability to its officers and the public. This project, funded by the COPS Office, reaffirms the importance of community policing as the premiere crime-fighting philosophy. We hope that law enforcement agencies will find this report useful in their efforts to improve their services to the citizens they are sworn to protect and serve.Categories: Ethics and IntegrityLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p184Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Jan 2010Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 02:13 (UTC-5) in 0.19 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4901 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4901

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to simplify the assessment 
              and collection of the excise tax on arrows.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 4, 1994

    Mr. Barcia of Michigan (for himself, Mr. Brewster and Mr. Camp) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to simplify the assessment 
              and collection of the excise tax on arrows.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SIMPLIFICATION OF IMPOSITION OF EXCISE TAX ON ARROWS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (b) of section 4161 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to imposition of tax) is amended to read 
as follows:
    ``(b) Bows and Arrows, Etc.--
            ``(1) Bows.--
                    ``(A) In general.--There is hereby imposed on the 
                sale by the manufacturer, producer, or importer of any 
                bow which has a draw weight of 10 pounds or more, a tax 
                equal to 11 percent of the price for which so sold.
                    ``(B) Parts and accessories.--There is hereby 
                imposed upon the sale by the manufacturer, producer, or 
                importer--
                            ``(i) of any part of accessory suitable for 
                        inclusion in or attachment to a bow described 
                        in subparagraph (A), and
                            ``(ii) of any quiver suitable for use with 
                        arrows described in paragraph (2),
                a tax equivalent to 11 percent of the price for which 
                so sold.
            ``(2) Arrows.--There is hereby imposed on the sale by the 
        manufacturer, producer, or importer of any shaft, point, nock, 
        or vane of a type used in the manufacture of any arrow which 
        after its assembly--
                    ``(A) measures 18 inches overall or more in length, 
                or
                    ``(B) measures less than 18 inches overall in 
                length but is suitable for use with a bow described in 
                paragraph (1)(A),
        a tax equal to 11 percent of the price for which so sold.
            ``(3) Coordination with subsection (a).--No tax shall be 
        imposed under this subsection with respect to any article 
        taxable under subsection (a).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to articles sold by the manufacturer, producer, or importer after 
the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### D. O. Ratliff, joined by his wife, Alice S. Ratliff, and Ratliff Holding Company, a corporation, *Appellants*, vs. Arthur C. Schenck, as Receiver of the Bank of Wauchula, a Corporation, *Appellee.*

134 So. 437.

En Banc.

Opinion filed August 6, 1932.

Petition for rehearing denied September 17, 1932.

W. *W. Whitehurst*and *TreaCkvell & Treadwell,*for Appellants ;

*B. B. Hwjfaher,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

In this cause Mr. Chief Justice Buford, Mr. Justice Brown and Mr. Justice Davis are of opinion that the decree of the Court below should -be affirmed while Mr. Justice Whitfield, Mr. Justice Ellis and Mr. Justice *409Terrell are of opinion that the said decree should be reversed. When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the decree should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the decree should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority o'f State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51, that the decree of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown, and Davis, J.J., concur.
No. 11-8772.

#### Greene *v.*Department of Labor.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 95.3305 Radar operator eligibility in the 76-81 GHz Band.

Subject to the requirements of §§ 95.305 and 95.307, any person is eligible to operate a radar in the 76-81 GHz band without an individual license; such operation must comply with all applicable rules in this subpart.
#### § 95.2585 MedRadio RF exposure evaluation.

A MedRadio medical implant device or medical body-worn transmitter is subject to the radiofrequency radiation exposure requirements specified in §§ 1.1307(b) and 2.1093 of this chapter, as appropriate. Applications for equipment authorization of devices operating under this section must demonstrate compliance with these requirements using either computational modeling or laboratory measurement techniques. Where a showing is based on computational modeling, the Commission retains the discretion to request that supporting documentation and/or specific absorption rate (SAR) measurement data be submitted, as described in § 2.1093(d)(1) of this chapter.

[85 FR 18151, Apr. 1, 2020]
#### § 12.37 Can I get my property back while the claim is pending?

If you have filed a claim and you think that continued possession of the property by the United States during the forfeiture proceeding will cause you substantial hardship, you may request under 18 U.S.C. 983(f) that the Service return the property to you pending the resolution of the judicial forfeiture proceeding. In determining whether to grant or deny your request, the Service will consider the factors set out in 18 U.S.C. 983(f). You must furnish evidence substantiating the hardship, and that none of the conditions set forth in 18 U.S.C. 983(f)(8) apply; for example, the property may not be contraband.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to 10 U.S.C.  Section  1350 as adopted  pursuant to Section 1350 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  in  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of
Electronic Game Card, Inc. on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending June 30, 2005,
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report") for Electronic  Game Card,  Inc.,  (the  "Company"),  the  undersigned
hereby certifies that:

(1)      to the  best of my  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with  the
         requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

(2)      to the best of my knowledge,  the  information  contained in the Report
         fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and
         result of operations of the Company.

March 7, 2006


/S/ LEE COLE
-------------------------------
    LEE COLE
    ACTING PRESIDENT AND ACTING
    CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
§ 78.115 Modulation limits. ( a ) If amplitude modulation is employed, negative modulation peaks shall not exceed 100 percent modulation.
[37 FR 3292, Feb. 12, 1972, as amended at 45 FR 78696, Nov. 26, 1980]
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent
  required by 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Financial
  Officer of Jupiter Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) that, to his
  knowledge:

| | * | the periodic report of the Company on Form 10-QSB
        for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fully
        complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | * | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                                                                                                                        

|Date: March 16, 2005 | By: | /s/ Alexander Chen                     
|-------------------- | --- | ---------------------------------------
|                     |     |                                        
|                     |     | Alexander Chen, Chief Financial Officer

---
§ 90.269 Use of frequencies for self-powered vehicle detectors. ( a ) Frequencies subject to § 90.20(d)(22) may be used for the operation of self-powered vehicle detectors by licensees of base/mobile stations in the Public Safety Pool in accordance with the following conditions: ( 1 ) All stations are limited to 100 milliwatts carrier power and 20K00F7W, 20K00F7X, 20K00F8W, 20K00F8X, 20K00F9W or 20K00F9X emissions. The frequency deviation shall not exceed 5 kHz. No more than two 30 ms. pulses may be emitted for each vehicle sensed.
( 2 ) The transmitters must be crystal controlled with a frequency tolerance of plus or minus .005% from −20° to plus 50 °C. They must be certificated.
( 3 ) The total length of the transmission line plus antenna may not exceed one-half wavelength and must be integral with the unit.
( 4 ) All operation shall be on a secondary, non-interference basis.
( b ) [Reserved]
[48 FR 54982, Dec. 8, 1983, as amended at 54 FR 38681, Sept. 20, 1989; 62 FR 18929, Apr. 17, 1997; 63 FR 36610, July 7, 1998]