alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2














CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "Report") for the period ended December 31, 2009 of Dime Community Bancshares, Inc., (the "Company") as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Kenneth J. Mahon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









March 12, 2010


Date









By:  /s/ KENNETH
J. MAHON


Kenneth J. Mahon


First Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
32.2
      Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of Genesis Capital Corporation
      of
      Nevada pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002






CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Genesis Capital
      Corporation of Nevada (the "Company") for the quarter ended December 31, 2006
      as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      the undersigned Christopher Astrom, Chief Financial Officer of Genesis Capital
      Corporation of Nevada, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) the
      Report
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      February 13, 2007





/s/
      CHRISTOPHER ASTROM


Christopher
      Astrom


Chief
      Financial Officer
•Brick Fbrd

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

RECEIVED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

FEB 11 2015

NO.

Abel Acosta, Clerk

§ IN THE COURT OF

§

§ CRIMINAL APPEALS

§

§ OF TEXAS cm Fn INI

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Pro Se Motion for Extension of Time FEB 11 2015

To File Petition for Discretionary Review

Absl Acostci Clsrk

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS:

COMES NOW the Appellant/Petitioner in the above-styled and numbered cause and

respectfully moves this Honorable Court to extend the time for filing the Appellant's Petition for

Discretionary Review in this cause and in support thereof would show to the Court the

following:

1. The style and number ofthis case in the Court of Appeals, is: Fnr-H Y±.

The State ofTexas, Appeal No. 05-13-01482 -CR.

2. The style and number ofthe case in the trial court is: The StateofTexas v.

Ford ; CauseNo. F1355893N; from the 195TH DistrictCourtof

Dallas County, Texas.

3. The Appellant was convicted ofthe felony offense of Delivery Cont. Sub

4. Judgment was entered on 5/i7/i3and punishment was assessed at 20 Years

years confinement and a fine in the amount of $10,000.00 •

5. The conviction was affirmed in the Court of Appeals on m / ? fi /1 5 •

PRO SE MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW - Page 1
6. The deadline for filing the Appellant's Petition for Discretionary Review in this

cause is 02/25/15 .

7. An extension oftime for a period ofsixty (60) days is requested that would make

the due date 04/25/15 .

8. No prior request for an extension oftime has been made.

9. The facts relied upon to show good cause for the requested extension are, as

follows: The Appellant/Petitioner was represented by court appointed counsel during the appeal

ofthis case to the Court of Appeals. After the conviction was affirmed, the trial court refused to

appoint counsel to file a Petition for Discretionary Review. Therefore, additional time is needed

for the Appellant/Petitioner to either prepare and file the Petition pro se or to seek legal

assistance in filing the Petition.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the Appellant /Petitioner respectfully

requests that this Honorable Court extend time for filing the Petition for Discretionary Review in

this cause to 04/25/15 .

Respectfully submitted,

*5>ijlXL 1. ^A,

[Name]

PRO SE MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW - Page 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The Appellant/Petitioner hereby certifies that a true and correct copy ofthe foregoing

Motion has been mailed to the Office ofthe Criminal District Attorney for Dallas County, Frank

Crowley Courts Building, 133 North Industrial Blvd., 11th Floor, Dallas, Texas 75207, and

mailed via U.S. mail, to the Office ofthe State Prosecuting Attorney, P.O. Box 12405, Capitol

Station, Austin, Texas 78711, on the 06 day of February ,-BBft / 2015.

^"rticL* f.

[Name]

PRO SE MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW - Page 3
SUPERSEDED
SUPERSEDED
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P287Collaborative Reform Model: Final Assessment Report of the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police DepartmentThe Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department (LVMPD) agreed to take part in the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS Office) initiative, known as the "Collaborative Reform Model." As part of this initiative, LVMPD agreed to an in-depth assessment of its use of deadly force policies and practices. This report is the final assessment of LVMPD with respect to the Collaborative Reform Model. It has been two years since the beginning of the reform process, and one year since the reforms were recommended. The purpose of this report is to inform all stakeholders and interested parties of the progress made toward reforming LVMPD's policies and practices with respect to officer-involved shootings.By George Fachner, Steven CarterCategories: Police OperationsLanguage: EnglishLow stockPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p287Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFBook • Jun 2014Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 00:53 (UTC-5) in 0.20 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
§ 95.987 CBRS additional requirements. Each CBRS transmitter type must be designed to satisfy all of the additional requirements in this section. ( a ) *Transmit frequency capability.* Each CBRS transmitter type must be designed to transmit only on one or more of the channels listed in § 95.963. No CBRS transmitter type will be certified for use in the CBRS service if it is capable of transmitting on any frequency or channel other than those listed in § 95.963, unless such transmitter type is also certified for use in another radio service for which the frequency capability is authorized and for which FCC certification is also required.
( b ) *Frequency determining circuitry.* All frequency determining circuitry (including crystals) and programming controls in each CBRS transmitter type must be internal to the transmitter and must not be accessible from the operating panel or from the exterior of the transmitter enclosure.
( c ) *Final amplifier component ratings.* The dissipation rating of all the semiconductors or electron tubes which supply RF power to the antenna terminals of each CB transmitter must not exceed 10 Watts. For semiconductors, the dissipation rating is the greater of the collector or device dissipation value established by the manufacturer of the semiconductor. These values may be temperature de-rated by no more than 50 °C. For an electron tube, the dissipation rating is the Intermittent Commercial and Amateur Service plate dissipation value established by the manufacturer of the electron tube.
( d ) *External controls.* Only the external transmitter controls, connections or devices listed in this paragraph are allowed to be incorporated in a CBRS transmitter type. The FCC, however, may authorize additional controls, connections or devices after considering the functions to be performed by such additions. ( 1 ) Primary power connection. External power supplies may be used.
( 2 ) Microphone connection.
( 3 ) Antenna connection.
( 4 ) Headphone and speaker output connections and related selector switch.
( 5 ) On-off switch for primary power to the transmitter. This switch may be combined with receiver controls such as the receiver on-off switch and volume control.
( 6 ) Upper/lower sideband selector switch (for a transmitter that is capable of transmitting SSB emissions).
( 7 ) Carrier level selector control (for a transmitter that is capable of transmitting SSB emissions). This control may be combined with the sideband selector switch.
( 8 ) Channel selector switch.
( 9 ) Transmit/receive selector switch.
( 10 ) Meter(s) and selector switch(es) for monitoring transmitter performance.
( 11 ) Pilot lamp(s), meter(s), light emitting diodes, liquid crystal devices or other types of visual display devices to indicate the presence of RF output power or that the transmitter control circuits are activated to transmit.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cigma Metals Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Antonio Jaramillo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Antonio Jaramillo
Dated: November 13, 2012




By:
Antonio JaramilloTitle:
Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial Officer,

Principal Accounting Officer and Director)


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Maureen D. Howley, Chief Financial Officer & Senior Vice President of the Managing Owner, Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. (the Managing
Owner), of Futures Strategic Trust (the Trust), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Trusts Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Maureen D. Howley                          
|Maureen D. Howley                              
|Chief Financial Officer & Senior Vice President
|                                               
|March 30, 2005
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5062

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the limited

deduction of health insurance costs of self-employed individuals.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 20, 1994

Mrs. MEYERS of Kansas (for herself, Mr. KOLBE, Mrs. MORELLA, Mr. BOEHLERT, Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut, Mr. EHLERS, Mr. HOBSON, Mr.

CASTLE, Mr. PORTMAN, Mr. UPTON, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mr.

ROBERTS, Mr. MCCLOSKEY, Mr. GOSS, Mr. PENNY, Mr. COX, Mr.

BALLENGER, Mr. HYDE, Mr. LEACH, Mr. HUTTO, Mr. TORRICELLI, Mr.

WALKER, Mr. DREIER, Mr. HOLDEN, Mr. KANJORSKI, Mr. CHAPMAN,

Mr. KLINK, Mr. DELAY, Mr. BARTON of Texas, Mr. REGULA, Mr.

BLUTE, Mrs. ROUKEMA, Mr. VENTO, Mr. PAXON, Mr. HUNTER, Mr.

MCCRERY, Mr. GALLEGLY, Mr. BATEMAN, Mr. GILMAN, Mr. BERMAN,

Mr. LIGHTFOOT, Mr. SHAW, Mr. DORNAN, Mr. FAWELL, Mr. SOLOMON,

Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. WISE, Mr. OBERSTAR, Mr. KNOLLENBERG,

Mr. ZELIFF, Mr. BAKER of Louisiana, Mr. TORKILDSEN, Mr. COLLINS

of Georgia, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. HASTERT, Mr. MCINNIS, and Mr.

STEARNS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make

permanent the limited deduction of health insurance

costs of self-employed individuals.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That paragragh (6) of section 162(l) of the Internal Reve-
2

HR 5062 IH

1 nue Code of 1986 (relating to termination date) is hereby

2 repealed.

Æ
# Transfers of Defense Articles and Services in Support of Sudan Security Sector Transformation (SST) Program

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State

Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, including section 40(g) of the Arms Export Control Act (AECA), I hereby: 

                    You are authorized and directed to report this determination to the Congress and to arrange for its publication in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

[FR Doc. 06-7616

Billing code 4710-10-P
# Comments on: 20-2208: CUSTOMPLAY, LLC v. AMAZON.COM, INC. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 169 (Thursday, August 31, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51806-51807]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7281]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Meeting of the Board of Visitors of Marine Corps University

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Executive Committee of the Board of Visitors of the Marine 
Corps University (BOV MCU) will meet

[[Page 51807]]

to receive the recommendations of the Officer Professional Military 
Education Study Group. The Board will receive the final written report 
from the three-month study of Marine Corps Professional Military 
Education. All sessions of the meeting will be open to the public.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Friday, September 29, 2006, from 1 
p.m. to 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Marine Corps University, 
2076 South Street, Quantico, Virginia 22134, in the Hooper Room.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Mary Lanzillotta, Executive 
Secretary, Marine Corps University Board of Visitors, 2076 South 
Street, Quantico, Virginia 22134, telephone number 703-784-4037.

    Dated: August 21, 2006.
M.A. Harvison,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 06-7281 Filed 8-30-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
§ 95.561 FRS transmitter certification. ( a ) Each FRS unit (a transmitter that operates or is intended to operate in the FRS) must be certficated for use in the FRS in accordance with this subpart and subpart J of part 2 of this chapter.
( b ) A grant of equipment certification for the FRS will not be issued for any FRS transmitter type that fails to comply with all of the applicable rules in this subpart.
( c ) A grant of equipment certification will not be issued for hand-held portable radio units capable of operating under both this subpart (FRS) and under any other subparts of this chapter (except part 15) if the application for such grant is filed on or after December 27, 2017.
---

Exhibit 13.2

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
  ss.1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Polymet Mining Corp.
  (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ended January 31, 2005 as filed
  with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Terese J.
  Gieselman Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: July 22, 2005

| | /s/ Terese J. Gieselman      
| | -----------------------------
| | Terese J. Gieselman          
| | Chief Financial Officer      
| | (Principal Financial Officer)

---
§ 26.305 Incorporation by reference. Certain material is incorporated by reference into this subpart with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved incorporation by reference (IBR) material is available for inspection at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). Contact the FCC at the address indicated in § 0.401(a) of this chapter; phone: (202) 418-0270; email: *oetinfo@fcc.gov .* For information on the availability of this material at NARA, visit *www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations* or email *fr.inspection@nara.gov .* The material may be obtained from National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), Office of Spectrum Management, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Room 1087, Washington, DC 20230; phone (202) 482-1850; website: *www.ntia.gov/office/office-spectrum-management-osm:* ( a ) NTIA Manual of Regulations and Procedures for Federal Radio Frequency Management, Annex J: Guidance for Determination of Necessary Bandwidth, NTIA Manual of Regulations and Procedures for Federal Radio Frequency Management, January 2023 Revision (of the January 2021 Edition); IBR approved for § 26.302. (Available at *www.ntia.gov/sites/default/files/2023-11/j_2021_edition_rev_2023.pdf .*)
( b ) NTIA Manual of Regulations and Procedures for Federal Radio Frequency Management, Annex M: Measurement Methods, January 2023 Revision (of the January 2021 Edition); IBR approved for § 26.302. (Available at *www.ntia.gov/sites/default/files/2023-11/m_2021_edition_rev_2023.pdf .*)
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 1 7

- 50 595 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. JOSE MALDONADO

- ZELAYA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2 :1 5

- CR

- 957

- 1

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jose Maldonado

- Zelaya appeals the 60

- month above

- guidelines sentence and 3

- year term of supervised release imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry. He argues that his sentence violates due process because it exceeds the statutory maximum sentence of 8 U.S.C. § 1326( a). He concedes that the issue whether his eligibility for a sentencing enhancement under § 1326(b) must be alleged in the indictment and proved to a jury is

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 8, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-50595 Document: 00514378315 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/08/2018No. 1 7

- 50 595

2 foreclosed by Almendarez

- Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998). However, he seeks to pres erve the issue for possible Supreme Court review because, he argues, subsequent Supreme Court decisions indicate that the Court may reconsider this issue. In Almendarez

- Torres , 523 U.S. at 239

- 47, the Supreme Court held that for purposes of a statutory se ntencing enhancement, a prior conviction is not a fact that must be alleged in an indictment or found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. This court has held that subsequent Supreme Court decisions did not overrule Almendarez

- Torres

. See United States v . Wallace , 759 F.3d 486, 497 (5th Cir. 2014) (considering the effect of Alleyne v. United States , 570 U.S. 99 (2013)); United States v. Pineda

- Arrellano , 492 F.3d 624, 625

- 26 (5th Cir. 2007) (considering the effect of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 ( 2000)). Thus, Maldonado

- Zelaya ’s argument is foreclosed. Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Case: 17-50595 Document: 00514378315 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/08/2018