alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1



                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     Three Months Ended
                                                     -------------------
                                               June 30,                June 30,
                                                2001                     2000
<S>                                         <C>                      <C>
Net loss .......................            $   (180,532)            $   (162,963)

Actual outstanding common shares
at beginning of  period ........              50,004,474               50,000,000

Weighted basic shares ..........              50,004,474               50,000,000

Weighted diluted shares ........              50,004,474               50,000,000

Basic loss per share ...........            $       0.00             $       0.00

Diluted loss per share .........            $       0.00             $       0.00
</TABLE>



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      Six Months Ended
                                                      -----------------
                                              June 30,                 June 30,
                                                2001                     2000
<S>                                         <C>                      <C>
Net loss .......................            $    (43,804)            $ (3,251,812)

Actual outstanding common shares
at beginning of  period ........              50,004,474               50,000,000

Weighted basic shares ..........              50,004,474               50,000,000

Weighted diluted shares ........              50,004,474               50,000,000

Basic loss per share ...........            $       0.00             $      (0.07)

Diluted loss per share .........            $       0.00             $      (0.07)
</TABLE>
No. D-2666.

#### In re Discipline of Snyder.

Ronald Russ Snyder, of Jefferson, Ky., is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
#### § 95.1937 Station inspection.

Upon request by an authorized Commission representative, the 218-219 MHz Service system licensee must make any component CTS available for inspection.
No. 11-5934.

#### Taylor *v.*Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0927Indicators of Labor Trafficking: Food and Beverage IndustryLabor trafficking is a crime that involves compelling or coercing a person to provide labor or services and affects persons of all ages, races, genders, and nationalities. Labor traffickers often prey on those with vulnerable life circumstances and economic hardships. Labor trafficking victims can be found in legal and illegal labor industries, as well as hidden behind closed doors and in plain view. This toolkit provides resources for law enforcement, businesses, communities, and other stakeholders to identify, respond to, and address labor trafficking and to support its victims and survivors. This resource was developed as part of the Partnerships to Address Labor Trafficking project. For more information and additional resources, visit https://cops.usdoj.gov/labor_trafficking.By Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS Office), Institute for Intergovernmental Research (IIR)Categories: Nonviolent CrimeLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0927Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Jan 2021Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 00:45 (UTC-5) in 0.94 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
EX-10.25 SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION



 





Exhibit 10.25




Compensation Arrangements with Non-Employee Directors




     The following table sets forth the Company’s current compensation arrangements with its
non-employee directors.



Annual Retainer — $35,000, paid quarterly (40% automatically paid in deferred stock units under
the Deferred Compensation Plan discussed below)



Additional Annual Retainer for Chairman of the Board — $60,000




Additional Annual Retainer for Chairman of the Audit Committee — $10,000




Additional Annual Retainer for Chairman of the Compensation Committee — $5,000




Board Meeting Fees — $2,500 for attendance in person, $1,000 for telephonic attendance




Committee Meeting Fees — $2,000 for attendance in person at a meeting occurring on a day other
than the day of either a Board meeting or another committee meeting for which a particular
director is compensated, or $500 for telephonic attendance



Options — 15,000 shares upon initial election (vesting 3,000 per year), exercisable at market
price on date of grant




3,000 shares (proposed to be increased to 5,000 shares, subject to shareholder
approval) per year upon each re-election, vesting after 6 months and exercisable at
market price on date of grant




Once vested, options granted prior to 2007 remain exercisable for ten years from
the date of grant. Those proposed to be issued in and after 2007 ( subject to
shareholder approval) would remain exercisable for six years from the date of grant.



Phantom Stock Deferred Compensation Plan — Each director may elect to designate all or a portion
of his remaining cash compensation to purchase phantom EMS share units at current market
prices. Cash payout occurs following retirement as a director or, for voluntary deferrals,
after 5 years, subject to the director’s limited right to further defer. Payment is based on
market value of the common stock at the time paid, and is taxable income to the director only
at that time.



Umbrella Liability Insurance — $3 million personal liability coverage above normal limits under
personally-maintained household/auto policies


The Company also reimburses travel expenses incurred in connection with activities as a member of
the Board and its Committees.
United States Bankruptcy Court

Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division

Chapter 13

Case No. 16 B 26948

Judge Deborah L. Thorne

Shantella D Palmer

Debtor(s)

IN RE: )

)

)

Notice of Motion/Certificate of Service

Shantella D Palmer

1119 Bellwood Ave Apt 2E

Bellwood, IL 60104

Debtor Attorney: Cutler & Associates Ltd

via Clerk's ECF noticing procedures

On July 11, 2018 at 9:00AM, I will appear at the location listed 

to the right, and present this motion, a copy which is hereby 

served upon you.

I certify under penalty of perjury that this office caused a copy of 

this notice to be delivered to the persons named above by U.S. 

mail or by the methods indicated on or before Tuesday, June 19, 

2018.

> Dirksen Federal Building

> 219 South Dearborn

> Courtroom 613

> Chicago, IL 60604

/s/ MARILYN O. MARSHALL

MARILYN O. MARSHALL, TRUSTEE

Motion to Dismiss for Material Default

Comes now Marilyn O. Marshall, Standing Trustee, and requests that this case be dismissed pursuant to 11 

U.S.C. §1307(c), and in support thereof respectfully states the following:

1. The Debtor filed for Chapter 13 relief on August 22, 2016.

2. The Debtor's plan was Confirmed on October 17, 2016.

3. The Debtor's confirmed plan requires the debtor to submit tax returns and refunds to the Trustee starting with 

tax year 2016. The debtor has failed to tender 2017 taxes.

4. The Debtor has failed to tender either the tax return or refund.

5. The failure to tender the tax return and refund constitutes a material default of the Debtor's confirmed plan.

WHEREFORE, the Trustee prays that this case be dismissed, and for any and all other relief this Court deems 

just and proper.

MARILYN O. MARSHALL, TRUSTEE

Office of the Chapter 13 Trustee /s/ MARILYN O. MARSHALL

224 S Michigan Ave

Ste 800

Chicago, IL 60604

(312) 431-1300

Case 16-26948 Doc 30 Filed 06/18/18 Entered 06/18/18 12:14:53 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
§ 90.603 Eligibility. Except as specified in § 90.616, the following persons are eligible for licensing in the 806-824 MHz, 851-869 MHz, 896-901 MHz, and 935-940 MHz bands. ( a ) Any person eligible for licensing under subparts B, C, D, or E of this part.
( b ) Any person proposing to provide communications service to any person eligible for licensing under subparts B or C of this part on a not-for-profit, cost-shared basis.
( c ) Any person eligible under this part and proposing to provide on a commercial basis base station an ancillary facilities as a Specialized Mobile Radio Service System operator, for the use of individuals, federal government agencies and persons eligible for licensing under subparts B or C of this part.
[47 FR 41032, Sept. 16, 1982, as amended at 53 FR 1025, Jan. 15, 1988; 60 FR 15495, Mar. 24, 1995; 62 FR 18934, Apr. 17, 1997; 85 FR 43139, July 15, 2020]
11-3418-cv Kelly v. Town of Chelmsford UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, in the City of New York, on the 26 thday of June, two thousand twelve. PRESENT: PIERRE N. LEVAL, REENA RAGGI, DENNY CHIN, Circuit Judges

.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DANNY M. KELLY, Plaintiff-Appellant , v. No. 11-3418-cv TOWN OF CHELMSFORD, Defendant-Appellee

.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FOR APPELLANT: Danny M. Kelly, pro se , Chelmsford, Massachusetts. FOR APPELLEES: Greg J. Corbo, Jeffrey T. Blake, Kopelman and Paige, P.C., Boston, Massachusetts. Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Warren W. Eginton, Judge ; Holly B. Fitzsimmons, Magistrate Judge ). UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment entered on August 11, 2011, is AFFIRMED.2 Plaintiff Danny M. Kelly, pro se , appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action sua sponte pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. We review a § 1915(e) dismissal de novo . See Giano v. Goord , 250 F.3d 146, 149–50 (2d Cir. 2001). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and record of the underlying proceedings, which we reference only as necessary to explain our decision to affirm. The district court properly dismissed Kelly’s action. Kelly has three times previously attempted to litigate this claim. See Kelly v. Town of Chelmsford , 23 F. App’x 18 (1st Cir. 2001) (unpublished); Kelly v. Town of Chelmsford , 874 N.E.2d 1143 (Mass. App. Ct. 2007) (unpublished); Kelly v. Day , 585 F. Supp. 2d 211 (D. Mass. 2008). The claim was each time dismissed because of Kelly’s failure to exhaust his state remedy under Chapter 79 of the Massachusetts General Laws. He is not entitled to re-litigate the issue of the need to exhaust his state remedy. He does not claim to have since exhausted his state remedy by suing under Chapter 79, and his allowable time to do so has expired, see Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 79, § 16. Accordingly, his claim is now barred. We have considered the other arguments raised by Kelly on appeal and conclude that they are without merit. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT: CATHERINE O’HAGAN WOLFE, Clerk of Court
§ 95.2179 LPRS unwanted emission limits. The requirements in this section apply to each LPRS transmitter type both with and without the connection of attachments, such as an external microphone, power cord and/or antenna. ( a ) *Emission masks.* Emission masks applicable to transmitting equipment in the LPRS are defined by the requirements in the following table. The numbers in the paragraphs column refer to attenuation requirement rule paragraph numbers under paragraph (b) of this section. Channels
Paragraphs narrowband 5 kHz
(1), (2) standard band 25 kHz
(3), (4) extra band 50 kHz
(5), (6) AMTS 250 kHz
(7), (8)
( b ) *Attenuation requirements.* The power of unwanted emissions must be attenuated below the transmitter output power in Watts (P) by at least: ( 1 ) 30 + 20(fd − 2) dB, 55 + 10 log (P) dB, or 65 dB, whichever is the least attenuation, on any frequency removed from the center of the authorized bandwidth by a displacement frequency (fd, in kHz) of more than 2 kHz, up to and including 3.75 kHz.
( 2 ) 55 + 10 log (P) dB on any frequency removed from the center of the authorized bandwidth by more than 3.75 kHz.
( 3 ) 30 dB on any frequency removed from the channel center frequency by 12.5 kHz to 22.5 kHz.
( 4 ) 43 + 10 log (P) dB on any frequency removed from the channel center frequency by more than 22.5 kHz.
( 5 ) 30 dB on any frequency removed from the channel center frequency by 25 kHz to 35 kHz.
( 6 ) 43 + 10 log (P) dB on any frequency removed from the channel center frequency by more than 35 kHz.
( 7 ) 30 dB on any frequency removed from the channel center frequency by 125 kHz to 135 kHz.
( 8 ) 43 + 10 log (P) dB on any frequency removed from the channel center frequency by more than 135 kHz.
( c ) *Measurement conditions and procedures.* The power of unwanted emissions in the frequency bands specified in paragraphs (b)(1), (3), (5), and (7) of this section is measured with a reference bandwidth of 300 Hz. The power of unwanted emissions in the frequency ranges specified in paragraphs (b)(2), (4), (6), and (8) is measured with a reference bandwidth of at least 30 kHz.
#### HENRY S. HAINES, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. BURLINGTON COUNTY BRIDGE COMMISSION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS.

See same ease below: 14 *N. J. Super.*323.

*Messrs. Milton M.*and *Adrian M. linger, Mr. Robert L. Hood*and *Mr. Thomas D. Begley*for the petitioners.

*Mr. James M. Davis, Jr., Mr. John A. Matthews*and *Mr. Milton B. Gonford*for the respondents.

October 29, 1951.

Granted.
## Breadcrumb

-  National Minerals Information Center 

#           Feldspar Statistics and Information      

      By National Minerals Information Center

-  Home 
-  Commodities 
-  Countries 
-  Materials Flow 
-  US States 
-  NMIC Seminars 
-  Data 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  About 

Statistics and information on the worldwide supply of, demand for, and flow of the mineral commodity *feldspar* 

View Media Details

Feldspars are aluminosilicates containing varying amounts of calcium, potassium, or sodium.  In glassmaking, feldspar provides alumina for improving hardness, durability, and resistance to chemical corrosion.   In ceramics, feldspar is used as a flux, lowering the vitrifying temperature of a ceramic body during firing and forming a glassy phase.   Glass and ceramics continued to be the major end uses of feldspar.

***Subscribe**** to receive an email notification when a new publication is added to this page. On the Questions tab of the subscriber preferences page, select "Feldspar" and any other options in which you may be interested. Please see the ****list services**** page for more information..*

### **Annual Publications**

Mineral Commodity Summaries
                            - Feldspar    PDF Format:       |  1996  |  1997  |  1998  |  1999  |  2000  |  2001  |  2002  |  2003  |  2004  |  2005  |  2006  |  2007  |  2008  |  2009  |  2010  |  2011  |  2012  |  2013  |  2014  |  2015  |  2016  |  2017  |  2018  |  2019  |  2020  | 2021  |  2022  |  2023  |  **2024**  |
                            - Appendixes

Minerals Yearbook
                            - Feldspar and Nepheline Syenite    PDF Format:       |  1994  |  1995  |  1996  |  1997  |  1998  |  1999  |  2000  |  2001  |  2002  |  2003  |  2004  |  2005  |  2006  |  2007  |  2008  |  2009  |  2010  |  2011  |  2012  |  2013  |  2014  |  2015  |  2016  |  2017  |  2018  |    XLS Format:       |  2002  |  2003  |  2004  |  2005  |  2006  |  2007  |  2008  |  2009  |  2010  |  2011  |  2012  |  2013  |  2014  |  2015  |  2016  |  2017  |  2018  |  2019 tables-only release  |  **2020 tables-only release**  |  **2021 tables-only release**  |
                            - Archive       |  1932-1993  |

### **Special Publications**

                            - Historical Statistics for Mineral and Material Commodities in the United States  Data Series 140                               - Feldspar 
                            - U.S. Mineral Dependence-Statistical Compilation of U.S. and World Mineral Production, Consumption, and Trade, 1990-2010  Open-File Report 2013-1184

### Contacts

#### James "JJ" Barry

##### Supervisory Mineral Commodity Specialist

National Minerals Information Center

jbarry@usgs.gov
<PAGE>   1
                  [PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP letterhead]

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
                                                                   OGC 1998 10-K

Consent of Independent Accountants

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements of 
Outlook Group Corp. on Forms S-8 (Nos. 33-44491 and 33-44075) of our reports
dated July 20, 1998 on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule of Outlook Group Corp. and Subsidiaries as of May
31, 1998 and 1997, and for the years ended May 31, 1998, 1997, and 1996, which
reports are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


                                        /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Milwaukee, Wisconsin
August 31, 1998
No. 11-10152.

#### In re Lawrence.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*denied, and petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8.
No. 10-10807.

#### Williams *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Read more of the July Dispatch** Photo Contest Winner – St. Charles County (Missouri) Police Department
      
        New Crime Victims with Disabilities Toolkit
         
          Law Enforcement Recruitment Strategies: Reaching Out to Youth
          Meet the COPS Office Fellows: Kiana Farlow, Philadelphia Police Department
            Meet the COPS Office Fellows: Josh Larson, Vail Police Department	  
             Meet the COPS Office Fellows: John Nowels, Spokane County Sheriff’s Office
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Peter van Stolk, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Jones Soda Co.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4. The registrants other
certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):

a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Dated as of November 14, 2006.



/s/ Peter van StolkPeter van StolkPresident and Chief Executive Officer