alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 90.437 Posting station licenses. ( a ) The current original authorization for each station shall be retained as a permanent part of the station records but need not be posted.
( b ) Entities authorized under this part must make available either a clearly legible photocopy of the authorization for each base or fixed station at a fixed location at every control point of the station or an address or location where the current authorization may be found.
( c ) An applicant operating under temporary authority in accordance with § 90.159 must post an executed copy of FCC Form 601 at every control point of the system or an address or location where the current executed copy may be found.
[43 FR 54791, Nov. 22, 1978, as amended at 45 FR 59884, Sept. 11, 1980; 47 FR 41045, Sept. 16, 1982; 47 FR 51883, Nov. 18, 1982; 54 FR 4030, Jan. 27, 1989; 59 FR 59965, Nov. 21, 1994; 63 FR 68966, Dec. 14, 1998]
###### Editorial Note on Part 74

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 74 appear at 64 FR 4055, Jan. 27, 1999.

#### § 74.643 Interference to geostationary-satellites.

Applicants and licensees must comply with § 101.145 of this chapter to minimize the potential of interference to geostationary-satellites.

[68 FR 12771, Mar. 17, 2003]
#### § 95.735 RCRS equipment certification exception.

Notwithstanding the general requirement of § 95.335, a non-certified RCRS transmitter that transmits only in the 26-28 MHz band and complies with the applicable technical requirements in this subpart may be operated in the RCRS for the purpose of controlling a remote device.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the annual report of  International  DisplayWorks,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-K for the period  ending  October 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report").
We, Thomas A. Lacey, Chief Executive Officer and Ian Bebbington, Chief Financial
Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
our knowledge and belief:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



Dated: January 3, 2005              /s/ Thomas A. Lacey
       ---------------              --------------------------------------------
                                    Thomas A. Lacey,
                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                    (Principal Executive Officer)


                                    /s/ Ian N. Bebbington
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Ian Bebbington,
                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                    (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Financial profile, the 100largest agricultural cooperatives [electronic resource]**
 
1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002
 
SuDoc Number:A 109.10/3:
Item Number:0064-C-01 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000557997
 
January 21, 2020
§ 80.143 Required frequencies for radiotelephony. ( a ) Except for compulsory vessels, each ship radiotelephone station licensed to operate in the band 1605-3500 kHz must be able to receive and transmit J3E emission on the frequency 2182 kHz. Ship stations are additionally authorized to receive and transmit H3E emission for communications with foreign coast stations and with vessels of foreign registry. If the station is used for other than safety communications, it must be capable also of receiving and transmitting the J3E emission on at least two other frequencies in that band. However, ship stations which operate exclusively on the Mississippi River and its connecting waterways, and on high frequency bands above 3500 kHz, need be equipped with 2182 kHz and one other frequency within the band 1605-3500 kHz.
( b ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, at least one VHF radiotelephone transmitter/receiver must be able to transmit and receive on the following frequencies: ( 1 ) The distress, safety and calling frequency 156.800 MHz;
( 2 ) The primary intership safety frequency 156.300 MHz;
( 3 ) One or more working frequencies; and
( 4 ) All other frequencies necessary for its service.
( c ) Where a ship ordinarily has no requirement for VHF communications, handheld VHF equipment may be used solely to comply with the bridge-to-bridge navigational communication requirements contained in subpart U of this part.
[51 FR 31213, Sept. 2, 1986, as amended at 52 FR 35244, Sept. 18, 1987; 68 FR 46961, Aug. 7, 2003]
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-21113 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus VERNON PAUL FREDDIE, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CR-H-95-125-2

- - - - - - - - - - October 10, 1996 Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Vernon Paul Freddie appeals the sentencing judge's two-point increase in his offense level for obstructing justice. The district court made specific findings at sentencing that Freddie committed perjury at the trial of a co-defendant. Once a sentencing court finds that a defendant has committed perjury at trial, an upward adjustment is required under U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1. United States v. Storm , 36 F.2d 1289, 1295 (5th Cir. 1994), cert.No. 95-21113 - 2 - denied , 115 S. Ct. 1798 (1995). We have reviewed the record and the parties' brief and we find that evidence in the record supports the sentencing court’s finding that Freddie committed perjury when he testified that he possessed only four ounces of crack cocaine, rather than the 13.66-ounce amount he pleaded guilty to possessing.
AFFIRMED.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

S an Antonio, Texas

January 6, 2017

No. 04

- 16

- 00839

- CR

IN RE Richard LARES

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez , Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez , Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa , Justice

On December 29, 2016, Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The petition

complains the trial court ha s not ruled on a m otion Relator filed on September 18, 2016 entitled

“11.074 Motion for Counsel

. ” Relator seeks a writ of mandamus directing the trial judge to rule

on the motion. At the time the mandamus was filed, the Honorable Ray Olivarri was the

pre siding judge of the 399 th District Court of Bexar County, Texas. However, Judge Olivarri is

no longer the presiding judge of the 399 th District Court.

Pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we ABATE this proceeding for t hirty

days from the date of this order to allow the newly elected judge of the 399 th District Court of

Bexar County, Texas to consider Relator’s motion. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 7.2(b) (“If the case is an

original proceeding under Rule 52, the court must abate the proceeding to allow the successor to

reconsider the original party’s decision.”). The trial judge is directed to consider the motion in

question and determine what action, if any to take upon said motion.

Relator is ORDERED to file in this court either the appropriate motion to dismiss this

original proceeding or an amended petition for writ of mandamus and appendix no later than

fourteen days following the expiration of the thirty

- day abatement.

It is so ORDERED on January 6, 2017

.

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2006CR10110 , styled The State of Texas v. Richard Lares , pending in the

399th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Ray Olivarri presiding.PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

_______________________________ _

Keith E. Hottle , Clerk
Case 16-25207 Doc 51 Filed 07/17/17 Entered 07/18/17 09:46:44 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
###### Editorial Note on Part 97

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 97 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 97.23 Mailing and email addresses.

Each license grant must show the grantee's correct name, mailing address, and email address. The email address must be an address where the grantee can receive electronic correspondence. Revocation of the station license or suspension of the operator license may result when correspondence from the FCC is returned as undeliverable because the grantee failed to provide the correct email address.

[85 FR 85533, Dec. 29, 2020]
#### § 96.19 Operation near Canadian and Mexican borders.

Citizens Broadband Radio Service operation in the 3550-3700 MHz band is subject to current and future international agreements with Mexico and Canada. The terms of these agreements shall be implemented by the SAS.
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0929Indicators of Labor Trafficking: Law Enforcement DispatchLabor trafficking is a crime that involves compelling or coercing a person to provide labor or services and affects persons of all ages, races, genders, and nationalities. Labor traffickers often prey on those with vulnerable life circumstances and economic hardships. Labor trafficking victims can be found in legal and illegal labor industries, as well as hidden behind closed doors and in plain view. This toolkit provides resources for law enforcement, businesses, communities, and other stakeholders to identify, respond to, and address labor trafficking and to support its victims and survivors. This resource was developed as part of the Partnerships to Address Labor Trafficking project. For more information and additional resources, visit https://cops.usdoj.gov/labor_trafficking.By Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS Office), Institute for Intergovernmental Research (IIR)Categories: Nonviolent CrimeLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0929Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Jan 2021Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 00:45 (UTC-5) in 0.91 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
§ 53.211 Audit planning. ( a ) Before selecting an independent auditor, the Bell operating company shall submit preliminary audit requirements, including the proposed scope of the audit and the extent of compliance and substantive testing, to the Federal/State joint audit team organized pursuant to § 53.209(d);
( b ) The Federal/State joint audit team shall review the preliminary audit requirements to determine whether it is adequate to meet the audit requirements in § 53.209 (b). The Federal/State joint audit shall have 30 days to review the audit requirements and determine any modifications that shall be incorporated into the final audit requirements.
( c ) After the audit requirements have been approved by the Federal/State joint audit team, the Bell operating company shall engage within 30 days an independent auditor to conduct the biennial audit. In making its selection, the Bell operating company shall not engage any independent auditor who has been instrumental during the past two years in designing any of the accounting or reporting systems under review in the biennial audit.
( d ) The independent auditor selected by the Bell operating company to conduct the audit shall develop a detailed audit program based on the final audit requirements and submit it to the Federal/State joint audit team. The Federal/State joint audit team shall have 30 days to review the audit program and determine any modifications that shall be incorporated into the final audit program.
( e ) During the course of the biennial audit, the independent auditor, among other things, shall: ( 1 ) Inform the Federal/State joint audit team of any revisions to the final audit program or to the scope of the audit.
( 2 ) Notify the Federal/State joint audit team of any meetings with the Bell operating company or its separate affiliate in which audit findings are discussed.
( 3 ) Submit to the Chief, Enforcement Bureau, any accounting or rule interpretations necessary to complete the audit.
[62 FR 2926, Jan. 21, 1997, as amended at 67 FR 13226, Mar. 21, 2002]
# **EXHIBIT 31.1**

# ** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

I, Donald E. Brown, M.D., certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of Interactive Intelligence, Inc.;

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.  The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)  All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
|                                  |
|---------------------------------------|
| /s/ Donald E. Brown, M.D.             |   |
| Donald E. Brown, M.D.                 |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| Date: November 14, 2003          |

 

----
RAYMOND RIVAS

, Appellant,

v.

MR. C. HODGSON, WARDEN, COLUMBIA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; MS. JULIE JONES, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

, Appellee s

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 5719

_____________________________/

Opinion filed December 5, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County

. Wesley R. Douglas , Judge

. Raymond Rivas, pro se , Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee s

.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF

, WINOKUR

, and JAY

, J J

. , CONCUR.
Description of 2007 Cash Bonus Plan



 EXHIBIT 10.45 
  
 DESCRIPTION OF 2007 CASH BONUS PLAN 
  
 On February 27, 2007, the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors approved the 2007 Cash Bonus Plan (the “2007 Plan”) for all of its full-time, salaried employees, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), Chief Operating Officer (“COO”), Executive Vice President
(“EVP”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”). Under the terms of the 2007 Plan, the CEO and COO are eligible to receive bonuses of three percent of the Company’s pre-tax, pre-bonus income, the EVP is eligible to
receive a bonus based on  3/4 of 1% of the Company’s pre-tax, pre-bonus income and the CFO is eligible to receive a bonus
based on a specified percentage of the Company’s pre-tax, pre-bonus income. Region presidents are eligible to receive bonuses based upon specified percentages of their respective region pre-tax, pre-bonus income after corporate allocation, the
president of the Company’s mortgage subsidiary is eligible to receive a bonus based upon the mortgage subsidiary’s pre-tax, pre-bonus income if the mortgage subsidiary achieves a targeted profit amount, a targeted mortgage capture rate
(subject to adjustment upward or downward if actual performance is above or below the target) and a targeted customer service score (subject to adjustment upward or downward if actual performance is above or below the target), and all other
participants are eligible to receive bonuses based upon specified percentages of salary or specified percentages of a bonus pool determined as a specified percentage of pre-tax, pre-bonus income. 
  
 An employee’s right to receive a bonus under the 2007 Plan is generally
conditioned upon his or her being actively employed by the Company or its divisions or subsidiaries on the date of payment. Awards will be paid over two years, with 75% paid following the determination of the bonus awards, and 25% paid one year
later, except for administrative staff bonuses and mortgage subsidiary bonuses which will be paid in full. The amounts payable one year later are conditioned upon continued employment to the date of payment, except in the case of retirement, death
or disability. 
  
 The maximum aggregate amount of awards under
the 2007 Plan will not exceed 20% of the Company’s consolidated pre-tax income before bonuses. 
  
 The Compensation Committee retains the discretion to increase the bonus of a participant in the event of an extraordinary performance, or decrease it in
the case of a substandard performance, and may make this determination on the basis of objective or subjective criteria, including, but not limited to, the pay levels of executives at other major homebuilders.
---

Exhibit 13.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Polymet Mining Corp.
  (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ended January 31, 2005 as filed
  with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, William Murray,
  President, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
  to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: July 22, 2005

| | /s/ William Murray                   
| | -------------------------------------
| | William Murray                       
| | President, and Chief Executive       
| | Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

---