alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5060

To provide for the continuation of certain fee collections for the expenses

of the Securities and Exchange Commission for fiscal year 1995.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 20, 1994

Mr. GIBBONS introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to the

Committees on Energy and Commerce and Ways and Means

A BILL

To provide for the continuation of certain fee collections

for the expenses of the Securities and Exchange Commission for fiscal year 1995.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONTINUED COLLECTION OF REVENUES AU4 THORIZED.

5 During fiscal year 1995, the rate of fees under sec6 tion 6(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77f(b))

shall remain at 1 7 ⁄29 of 1 percent.

8 SEC. 2. DEPOSIT OF COLLECTIONS.

9 The fees collected under section 6(b) of the Securities

10 Act of 1933 (to the extent attributable to a rate in excess
2

•HR 5060 IH

of 1 1 ⁄50 of 1 percent by reason of section 1 of this Act)

2 shall be deposited as an offsetting collection to the

3 amounts appropriated to the Securities and Exchange

4 Commission for fiscal year 1995, to remain available until

5 expended.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, September 11, 2006, 5 p.m. to September 13, 2006, 6 p.m., Doubletree Hotel, 8120 Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda, MD, 20814 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on July 25, 2006. 71 FR 42098.                

The meeting notice is amended to reflect the change in hotel from the Doubletree Hotel, 8120 Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda, MD 20814 to the Clarion Hotel, 8400 Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda, MD 20814. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: August 22, 2006.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 06-7229  Filed 8-29-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350


In connection with the Annual Report of ION Geophysical Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, R. Brian Hanson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:


|   |                                                                                                                                      
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: April 17, 2013/s/ R. Brian HansonR. Brian HansonPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Strafford,

No. 4608.

#### Charles E. Palmer *v.*Farmington.

Argued October 1, 1957.

Decided November 5, 1957.

*132*Cooper, Hall & Cooper*and *John M. Brant {Mr. Brant*orally), for the plaintiff.

*Bums, Calderwood, Bryant & Hinchey*and *Errol S. Hall {Mr. Hall*orally), for the defendant.

Duncan, J.

In *deRochemont*v. *Holden,*99 N. H. 80, the authority of selectmen to sell real estate belonging to a town was considered and the conclusion reached that this power resides in the *133inhabitants of the town, and.does not fall within the authority of the selectmen in managing the prudential affairs of the town, or performing any other statutory duties of their office. See also, *Moulton*v. *Beals,*98 N. H. 461.

In the instant case the real estate which the town sold to the plaintiff was acquired by the town by tax deed from the collector. The parties do not question that the later sale by the town was duly authorized by vote of the town, and that conveyance was made by quitclaim deed containing no undertaking which would afford a basis for the action before us. The issue therefore arises whether the selectmen could bind the town by oral agreement, not alleged to have been authorized by vote of the inhabitants, that the town would indemnify or reimburse the purchaser for expenses incurred in perfecting or defending title to the premises conveyed.

The Trial Court committed no error in holding that the selectmen lacked such authority. The vote of the town is understood to have conferred no express authority beyond the power to sell and convey. The authority may be deemed to have carried with it by inference “all necessary or usual means of executing it with effect.” *Goodale*v. *Wheeler,*11 N. H. 424, 428. See Restatement, Agency, s. 51. But there is no suggestion that an undertaking to indemnify the plaintiff which he alleges was made by the selectmen in this case was necessary or usual to sale of the premises, or authorized by the town. *Cf. Cofran*v. *Cochran,*5 N. H. 458. Incurrence of such a liability cannot be presumed to have been in the interest of the town, or within the powers of selectmen in managing its prudential affairs, so as to be binding in the absence of an authorizing vote of the town *(Smith*v. *Epping,*69 N. H. 558), any more than a release of liability of a third person to the town would have been. *Carlton*v. *Bath,*22 N. H. 559.

The sale was at public auction *(Palmer*v. *Coulombe, supra,*267) with no condition attached to the sale or established by vote of the town. See Laws 1947, c. 269, now RSA 80:42. Thus the order of the Trial Court was sufficiently founded upon the selectmen’s lack of authority, and there is no occasion to consider the other grounds for the order. The order of dismissal or nonsuit is sustained.

*Exceptions overruled.*

All concurred.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 513 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 513

To limit the duration of payments of expenses of former Speakers of the 
                       House of Representatives.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 21, 1993

Mr. Goss (for himself, Mr. Shays, Mr. Ramstad, Mr. Petri, Mr. Taylor of 
   North Carolina, Mr. Jacobs, Mr. Bateman, Mr. Hyde, Mr. Klug, Mr. 
 Herger, Mr. Franks of Connecticut, Mr. Schiff, Mrs. Meyers of Kansas, 
  Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, Mr. Lewis of Florida, Mr. Bereuter, Mr. Baker of 
  Louisiana, Mr. Cox, Mr. Sensenbrenner, Mr. Hefley, Mr. Zeliff, Mr. 
 Penny, Mr. Kyl, Mr. Roybal, Mr. Greenwood, Mr. Bartlett, Mr. Inglis, 
Mr. Hoekstra, Mr. Goodlatte, Mr. Inhofe, and Ms. Fowler) introduced the 
     following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To limit the duration of payments of expenses of former Speakers of the 
                       House of Representatives.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON THE DURATION OF PAYMENTS OF EXPENSES OF FORMER 
              SPEAKERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.

    The period for which expenses of former Speakers of the House of 
Representatives may be paid shall end 3 years after the date of the 
expiration of the term of office as Representative of the former 
Speaker involved, except that, in the case of a former Speaker who is 
receiving such expenses on the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
period shall end 3 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION.

    As used in section 1, the term ``expenses of former Speakers of the 
House of Representatives'' means the office, allowance, and other 
expenses provided for former Speakers of the House of Representatives 
under House Resolution 1238, Ninety-first Congress, enacted into 
permanent law by chapter VIII of the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 
1971 (2 U.S.C. 31b-1 et seq.).

                                 <all>
```
#### § 19.4 Definitions.

In addition to definitions contained in part 10 of this subchapter, and unless the context otherwise requires, in this part 19:

*Harass* means to disturb, worry, molest, rally, concentrate, harry, chase, drive, herd or torment.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 167 (Tuesday, August 29, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51208-51209]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7217]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Geological Survey


Request for Public Comments on Information Collection To Be 
Submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for Review Under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act

    A request extending the collection of information listed below will 
be submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for approval under 
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). 
Copies of the proposed collection of information and related forms may 
be obtained by contacting the USGS Clearance Officer at the phone 
number listed below. Comments and suggestions on the requirement should 
be made within 60 days directly to the USGS Clearance Officer, U.S. 
Geological Survey, 807 National Center, Reston, VA 20192. As required 
by OMB regulations at CFR 1320.8(d)(1), the U.S. Geological Survey 
solicits specific public comments regarding the proposed information 
collection as to:

[[Page 51209]]

    1. Whether the collection of information is necessary for the 
proper performance of the functions of the USGS, including whether the 
information will have practical utility;
    2. The accuracy of the USGS estimate of the burden of the 
collection of information, including the validity of the methodology 
and assumptions used;
    3. The utility, quality, and clarity of the information to be 
collected; and,
    4. How to minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated 
electronic, mechanical, or other forms of information technology.
    Title: Mine Development and Minerals Information Supplement.
    Current OMB approval number: 1028-0060.
    Abstract: Respondents supply the U.S. Geological Survey with 
domestic production, exploration, and mine development data on nonfuel 
mineral commodities. This information will be published as an Annual 
Report for use by Government agencies, industry, education programs, 
and the general public.
    Bureau form number: 9-4000-A.
    Frequency: Annual.
    Description of respondents: Nonfuel Mineral Producers and 
Exploration Operations.
    Annual Responses: 617.
    Annual burden hours: 463.
    Bureau clearance officer: Alfred Travnicek, 703-648-7231.

W. David Menzie,
Acting Chief Scientist, Minerals Information Team.
[FR Doc. 06-7217 Filed 8-28-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4311-AM-M
#### § 90.255 [Reserved]
No. 11-663.

No. 11-747.

#### Intermountain Insurance Service of Vail, LLC, et al. *v.*Commissioner of Internal Revenue. UTAM, Ltd., et al. *v.*Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Reported below: 650 F. 3d 691; and

C. A. D. C. Cir. Reported below: 645 F. 3d 415. Certiorari granted, judgments vacated, and cases remanded for further consideration in light of *United States*v. *Home Concrete & Supply, LLC, ante,*p. 478.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4930 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4930

   To amend the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management Act to 
authorize the Secretary of Commerce to prepare fishery management plans 
and amendments to fishery management plans under negotiated rulemaking 
                              procedures.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 10, 1994

  Ms. Snowe introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management Act to 
authorize the Secretary of Commerce to prepare fishery management plans 
and amendments to fishery management plans under negotiated rulemaking 
                              procedures.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO PREPARE FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLANS AND AMENDMENTS 
              UNDER NEGOTIATED RULEMAKING PROCEDURES.

    (a) Authority.--Section 304(c) of the Magnuson Fishery Conservation 
and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1854(c)) is amended by adding at the end 
the following:
    ``(4)(A) In addition to the authority of the Secretary under 
paragraph (1), the Secretary, under the procedures for negotiated 
rulemaking established by subchapter III of chapter 5 of title 5, 
United States Code, may prepare--
            ``(i) a fishery management plan with respect to any 
        fishery, or any amendment to any such a plan, and
            ``(ii) such proposed regulations as are necessary or 
        appropriate to carry out a fishery management plan or amendment 
        prepared under clause (i).
    ``(B) A fishery management plan or amendment prepared under 
procedures for negotiated rulemaking pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall 
be prepared--
            ``(i) in accordance with the national standards, the other 
        provisions of this Act (other than paragraph (1)), and any 
        other applicable law; and
            ``(ii) in consultation with the Secretary of State with 
        respect to foreign fishing, and with the Secretary of the 
        department in which the Coast Guard is operating with respect 
        to enforcement at sea.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 304(c) of the Magnuson Fishery 
Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1854(c)) is amended in each 
of paragraphs (2)(A) and (3) by striking ``paragraph (1)'' and 
inserting ``this subsection''.
                                 <all>
```
-#-



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Tech Capital Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

I have reviewed Report;

2.

Based on my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by the Report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in the Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report;

4.

I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have:

(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which the Report is being prepared;

(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of the Report (the Evaluation Date); and

(c)

presented in the Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

1.

I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Companys auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

1.

I have indicated in the Report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date:  May 8, 2003



Michael Mitsiadis



Michael Mitsiadis

President and Chief Executive Officer
---

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 United States Code §
1350As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

The undersigned hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2008 of PolyMet Mining Corp. (the “Company”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: August 27, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Joseph Scipioni          
|--------------------- | ------ | -----------------------------
|                      | Name:  | Joseph Scipioni              
|                      | Title: | Chief Executive
      Officer
|                      |        |                              
|                      |        |                              
|Date: August 27, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Douglas Newby            
|                      | Name:  | Douglas Newby                
|                      | Title: | Chief Financial
      Officer

---
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report included in this Form 10-KSB, into The Eastwind Group, Inc.'s previously 
filed Form S-8 Registration Statement (File No. 333-28103) filed with the 
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 30, 1997 and Form S-3 Registration 
Statement (File No. 333-34697) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on August 29, 1997.


                                                             ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Philadelphia, Pa.,
  April 17, 1998
Case 16-23307 Doc 15 Filed 08/02/16 Entered 08/03/16 10:10:09 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
Case 16-23423 Doc 8 Filed 07/25/16 Entered 07/26/16 07:23:39 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
#### § 14.63 Export declaration requirements.

Except as otherwise provided by the regulations of this subpart, a completed Declaration for Importation or Exportation of Fish or Wildlife (Form 3-177) signed by the exporter, or the exporter's agent, shall be filed with the Service prior to the export of any wildlife at the port of exportation as authorized in subpart B of this part. All applicable information requested on the Form 3-177 shall be furnished, and the exporter or the exporter's agent shall certify that the information furnished is true and complete to the best of his/her knowledge and belief.
April 25 , 2012

Rick Albright, Director
Office of Air, Waste, and Toxics

U.S. E nvironmental P rotection A gency , Region 10

1200 Sixth Avenue
Seattle, WA 98101

Re: Washington Regional Haze S tate Implementation Plan

Dear Mr. Albright:

It is my understanding that t he U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will soon propose to approve or partially approve Washing ton’s regional haze S tate I mplementation

P lan (SIP)

. In rule

- making dockets proposing action on regional haze SIPs for other states

, the EPA has specified comment periods of either 30 or 60 days. 1 I am writing on behalf of

the Assoc iation of Washington Business (AWB ) to request the EP A to allow 60 days for interested parties to comment on the EPA’s proposed action on Washington ’ s regional haze

SIP.

The basis for this request is that the EPA has previously notified AWB members that its proposed action on the Washington submittal may be complex, possibly including findings that the SIP submitted by Washington is inadequate in certain respects to meet the requirements of the EPA’s regional haze rules. AWB members understand that the proposal may include a Federal Implementation Plan.

Several of our members have expressed the need for an extended comment period so that they have adequate time to analyze the EPA’s proposal and to submi t well

- informed

comments. A 60

- day comment period is warranted to allow stakeholders to obtain the

1 See , e.g. 77 Fed. Reg. 18052 (March 26, 2012) (60

- day comment period on Colorado regional haze SIP) and 77 Fed. Re g. 11022 (February 24, 2012) (30

- day comment period on Alaska regional haze SIP).technical and scientif ic assistance needed to understand and analyze the findings

s upporting the proposed rule.

For these reasons, AWB requests that the EPA include a 60

- day comment period in its notice of proposed rule making on the Washington regional haze SIP.

Thank you fo r your attention to this request.

Sincerely,

Gary Chandler

Vice President of Government Affairs

cc: Director Ted Sturdevant , Washington Department of Ecology