alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            College of Information and Cyberspace
                    National Defense University
                CIC
        Search
                    Search CIC:
                        Search
                Search CIC:
                    Search
    Home

    About 
        Mission & Vision

    Faculty & Staff

    Fact Sheet

    Alumni

    Internships

    FAQ

    Admissions 
        Eligibility Requirements

    Admissions Calendar

    Application Instructions

    Apply Online

    International Students

    Academics 
        Graduate Catalog

    M.S. in Strategic Information and Cyberspace Studies
        
        JPME Master's Degree

    Cyber Workforce Master's Degree (Part Time)

    Leadership Development Programs

    Graduate Certificates

    Academic Partners

    Current Students 
        JPME II  Incoming Students

    LDP Incoming Students

    Student Registration

    Bring Your Own Device

    IA Compliance

    Completion Procedures / Order Transcripts

    Student Services and Resources

    Events
    
        Cyber Beacon

    Cyber PME Colloquium

    Hopper Award

    Lecture Series

    CYBERCOM Symposium

    NEWS

    UC2
    
        About

    Events

    Work With Us

    Center for Cybersecurity
    
        About

    Cybersecurity Center POC

    Cybersecurity Supporting Faculty

    CAE-CDE CISO Certificate Program

    Cybersecurity Trending News

    Cyber Labs
        
        Ethical Hacking

    Critical Infrastructure - SCADA

    Cyber Exercises
        
        Tabletop Exercise

    Cyber Competitions

    Cyber Resources and Awareness

    Stakeholder / Industry Advisory Council

    Contact 
        Contact Us

    Directions

    Access to Ft. McNair

    Map of Ft. McNair  Home
  NEWS
  News & Announcements
 News & Announcements Download
 Details
 Share
 News
 Kelly Fletcher at Cyber Beacon 2021
 Dr. Kelly Fletcher, who is performing the duties of the DoD CIO, sits down with CIC faculty member and lead for the CIO LDP, Harry Wingo, at Cyber Beacon 2021. CHECK OUT THE VIDEO HERE
 SHARE
 PRINT
 National Defense University


College of Information and Cyberspace

300 Fifth Ave., Bldg. 62
Fort Lesley J. McNair
Washington, DC 20319-5066

202-685-6300
                    Stay Connected
                
                
                DOD Privacy & Security
 DOD Links Disclaimer
 DOD Social Media Policy
 DOD Web Policy
 FOIA
 NDU System of Records Notice
 NDU Privacy & Security Notice
 No FEAR Act
 Open GOV
 Plain Writing Act
 Section 508
 Small Business Act
 USA.gov
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
No. 11-10106.

#### Lee *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Jones Soda Co. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Peter van Stolk, President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                      |  |                   
|------------------------------------- |  | ------------------
|/s/ Peter van Stolk                   |  | November 15 , 2004
|Peter van Stolk,                      |  |                   
|Chief Executive Officer and President |  |
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 4, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41128

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MICHAEL RAY HARRISON

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:05-CR-70-ALL

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Michael Ray Harrison appeals his conviction and sentence for being a felon

in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He asserts that

the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress because his drug use

before his interrogation rendered his waiver of rights involuntary. He has not

established that the district court clearly erred in determining that his waiver

was knowing and intelligent. United States v. Reynolds 367 F.3d 294, 298-99

(5th Cir. 2004); United States v. Andrews, 22 F.3d 1328, 1340 (5th Cir. 1994).
No. 06-41128

2

Harrison contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his

conviction because there was no evidence corroborating his confession. There

was “‘substantial independent evidence that the offense has been committed,’”

which was sufficient to establish his guilt. United States v. Ybarra, 70 F.3d 362,

365 (5th Cir. 1995)(quoting United States v. Garth, 773 F.2d 1469, 1479 (5th Cir.

1985)).

Harrison also challenges his 327-month sentence. He asserts that the

district court wrongly found enhancements under the Sentencing Guidelines

that were not admitted by him or found by a jury, which violates the

Constitution. By rendering the Guidelines advisory only, United States v.

Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), eliminated Sixth Amendment concerns prohibiting

a sentencing judge from finding all facts relevant to sentencing. United States

v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 519 (5th Cir. 2005). Additionally, any challenge to the

sentencing enhancements under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1 would have no effect on his

sentence, as the probation officer reached the same offense level under U.S.S.G.

§ 4B1.4 by finding that Harrison was a career offender, and Harrison does not

challenge this ruling on appeal. Harrison has failed to overcome the

presumption of reasonableness in his imposed sentence, which was within a

properly-calculated guideline range. See Rita v. United States, 127 S. Ct. 2456,

2462-68 (2007). Consequently, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### §§ 95.2935-95.2959 [Reserved]
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Hans Boge the Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer ofKlondike Star Mineral Corporation, Inc. (the "Company") in compliance with 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, hereby certify that, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the period ended May 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company. 

  

|   | *Date: July 13, 2007_* | *Signed:* |                                         |
|--------|------------------------|-----------|-----------------------------------------|
|   |                   |      |                                    |
|   |                   | *Name:*   | *Hans Boge*                             |
|   |                   | *Title:*  | *Chief Executive Officer and principal* |
|   |                   |      | *financial officer*                     |
HOME FEDERAL BANCORP

                       FIRST AMENDMENT TO RIGHTS AGREEMENT

                             DATED NOVEMBER 22, 1994

         This First  Amendment to the Rights  Agreement dated as of November 22,
1994 (the "Rights Agreement"),  between Home Federal Bancorp (the "Company") and
LaSalle  National  Bank (the  "Rights  Agent"),  is effective as of November 25,
1997.

         A. Section 27 of the Rights Agreement  permits the Company to amend the
Rights  Agreement  to  increase  the  Purchase  Price  thereunder  prior  to the
Distribution  Date  (as  defined  therein)  and the  Distribution  Date  has not
occurred yet under the Rights Agreement.

         B. On November  25,  1997,  the Board of  Directors  of the Company
approved an amendment to the Rights Agreement which increased the Purchase Price
thereunder from $26.67 to $80.00.

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and the Rights Agent agree as follows:

         1.    Section 7(b) shall be amended to read in its entirety as follows:

                  "(b) The Purchase  Price for each Common Share pursuant to the
         exercise  of a Right  shall be $80.00,  shall be subject to  adjustment
         from time to time as provided  in Sections 11 and 13 hereof,  and shall
         be  payable  in  lawful  money  of the  United  States  of  America  in
         accordance with paragraph (c) below."

         IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the parties hereto have affixed their  signatures
hereto effective as of November 25, 1997.

                                         HOME FEDERAL BANCORP

                                         By:/s/ Lawrence E. Welker
                                            ------------------------

                                         LaSALLE NATIONAL BANK, as Rights Agent

                                         By:/s/ Gregory Malatia
<PAGE>   1





                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Outlook Group Corp. on Forms S-8 (Nos. 33-44491 and 33-44075) of our reports
dated June 26, 2000 on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule of Outlook Group Corp. and Subsidiaries as of May
31, 2000 and 1999, and for the years ended May 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998, which
reports are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.




PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Milwaukee, Wisconsin
August 16, 2000
Case 16-27198 Doc 9 Filed 08/26/16 Entered 08/30/16 10:32:43 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
No. 11-5685.

#### Chavez *v.*Grounds, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
###### Editorial Note on Part 74

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 74 appear at 64 FR 4055, Jan. 27, 1999.

#### § 74.1236 Emission and bandwidth.

(a) The license of a station authorized under this subpart allows the transmission of either F3 or other types of frequency modulation (see § 2.201 of this chapter) upon a showing of need, as long as the emission complies with the following:

(1) For transmitter output powers no greater than 10 watts, paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this section apply.

(2) For transmitter output powers greater than 10 watts, § 73.317 (a), (b), (c), and (d) apply.

(b) Standard width FM channels will be assigned and the transmitting apparatus shall be operated so as to limit spurious emissions to the lowest practicable value. Any emissions including intermodulation products and radiofrequency harmonics which are not essential for the transmission of the desired aural information shall be considered to be spurious emissions.

(c) The power of emissions appearing outside the assigned channel shall be attenuated below the total power of the emission as follows:

| Distance of emission from center frequency | Minimum attenuation below unmodulated carrier |
| --- | --- |
| 120 to 240 kHz | 25 dB |
| Over 240 and up to 600 kHz | 35 dB |
| Over 600 kHz | 60 dB |

(d) Greater attenuation than that specified in paragraph (c) of this section may be required if interference results outside the assigned channel.

[35 FR 15388, Oct. 2, 1970, as amended at 52 FR 31406, Aug. 20, 1987; 55 FR 50698, Dec. 10, 1990]
No. 11-5597.

#### Murtishaw *v.*California.

Sup. Ct. Cal. Cer-tiorari denied.
Case 16-26220 Doc 5 Filed 08/16/16 Entered 08/16/16 11:31:36 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-26220 Doc 5 Filed 08/16/16 Entered 08/16/16 11:31:36 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5102 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5102

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
 To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to certain crimes 
               relating to Congressional medals of honor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 
704(b)(2)(B) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting 
``, 6241, or 8741'' after ``3741''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 3, 1994.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.
                                     







103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5102

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to certain crimes 
               relating to Congressional medals of honor.`
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

|   | AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY |
|--------|------------------------|

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**In connection with the Quarterly Report of Siclone Industries, Inc., on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Paul Adams, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a)or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|   | **Date: November 16,  2007** | **/s/ Paul Adams** |
|--------|------------------------------|--------------------|

**Paul Adams**

**Chief Executive Officer**

And Principal Accounting Officer
#### § 19.21 Limitation on Federal permits.

No Federal permits will be issued to authorize any person to hunt, shoot, or harass any wildlife from an aircraft, except for Federal permits to scare or herd migratory birds referred to in § 21.100 of this subchapter.

[39 FR 1177, Jan. 4, 1974, as amended at 87 FR 880, Jan. 7, 2022]
##### 



EXHIBIT 21


STELLENT, INC.


SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


|                                        |  |                 |  |            |     |  
|--------------------------------------- |  | --------------- |  | ---------- | --- | -
|                                        |  | Jurisdiction of |  | Ownership  |    
|Subsidiary                              |  | Incorporation   |  | Percentage |    
|                                        |  |                 |  |            |    
|Stellent AB                             |  | Sweden          |  |            | 100 | %
|Stellent AAsia Pty. Ltd.               |  | Australia       |  |            | 100 | %
|Stellent Australia Pty. Ltd.            |  | Australia       |  |            | 100 | %
|Stellent B.V.                           |  | Netherlands     |  |            | 100 | %
|Stellent Holding B.V. Company           |  | Netherlands     |  |            | 100 | %
|Stellent Canada Ltd.                    |  | Canada          |  |            | 100 | %
|Stellent Chicago, Inc.                  |  | Illinois        |  |            | 100 | %
|Stellent Chicago Sales, Inc.            |  | Minnesota       |  |            | 100 | %
|Stellent Colorado Springs, Inc.         |  | Delaware        |  |            | 100 | %
|Stellent GmbH                           |  | Germany         |  |            | 100 | %
|Stellent Japan K.K.                     |  | Japan           |  |            | 100 | %
|Stellent Korea                          |  | Korea           |  |            | 100 | %
|Stellent Limited                        |  | United Kingdom  |  |            | 100 | %
|Stellent Mexico                         |  | Mexico          |  |            | 100 | %
|Stellent Sales, Inc.                    |  | Minnesota       |  |            | 100 | %
|Stellent S.A.R.L.                       |  | France          |  |            | 100 | %
|Stellent Iberica S.L.                   |  | Spain           |  |            | 100 | %
|Stellent Software Limited               |  | United Kingdom  |  |            | 100 | %
|Stellent S.R.L.                         |  | Italy           |  |            | 100 | %
|IntranetSolutions International Limited |  | United Kingdom  |  |            | 100 | %
|Optika Imaging Systems Europe LTD.      |  | United Kingdom  |  |            | 100 | %
|Optika Imaging Systems LTD.             |  | United Kingdom  |  |            | 100 | %
|TEAMwork Technologies                   |  | Massachusetts   |  |            | 100 | %
|Optika Asia Inc.                        |  | Delaware        |  |            | 100 | %
|Optika Imaging Systems GmbH             |  | Germany         |  |            | 100 | %
|Optika Information Systems Ltda.        |  | Brazil          |  |            | 100 | %
|Optika Technologies Inc.                |  | Delaware        |  |            | 100 | %
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 2073** 

ALICE FAYE HOLDER , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
v. TOWN OF ZEBULON , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. ( 5:14

- cv - 00018

- F )

Submitted : February 20, 2015 Decided: February 2 7 , 2015

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Alice Faye Holder, Appellant Pro Se. Allison Cohan, Amy Ruth Holbrook, BROWN LAW, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Alice Faye Holder appeals the d istrict court ’ s order dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (20 12 ) complaint for failure to state a claim . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Holder v. Town of Zebulon , No. 5:14

- cv - 00018

- F (E.D.N.C. Sept. 8, 2014) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
791 A.2d 196

#### IN THE MATTER OF WILLIAM E. AGRAIT, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

March 7, 2001.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 00-397, concluding that WILLIAM E. AGRAIT of NEWARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1984, should be reprimanded for violating *RPC*1.1(a) (gross neglect), *RPC*1.5(b) (failure to communicate basis of fee in writing), and *RPC*8.4(c) (misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that WILLIAM E. AGRAIT is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5015 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5015

 To amend section 223 of the Communications Act of 1934 to prevent the 
        harassment by computer modem or other electronic device.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 21, 1994

  Mr. Mfume introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 223 of the Communications Act of 1934 to prevent the 
        harassment by computer modem or other electronic device.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may by cited as the ``Electronic Anti-Stalking Act of 
1994''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

    Section 223(a) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 223(a)) 
is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new sentence: 
``For purposes of subparagraphs (B), (C), and (D), the terms 
`telephone' and `telephone call' include communications by means of 
computer modem or any other two-way wire or radio telecommunications 
device.''.
                                 <all>
```
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 23, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00627-CV

DELLA GOINES, Appellant

V.

SRMOF 2009-I TRUST, BY WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL 

ASSOCIATION NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL OR BANKING CAPACITY 

BUT SOLEY AS CERTIFICATE TRUSTEE OF THE TRUST, Appellees

On Appeal from the Co Civil Ct at Law No 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1046038

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is from a judgment signed July 23, 2014. On September 25, 

2014, this court found the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying 

appellant’s request to proceed without the payment of costs. Appellant was 

ordered to pay the appellate filing fee and make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s 

record on or before October 10, 2014, or the appeal would be dismissed. 
2

As of this date, appellant has not paid the appellate filing fee and has not 

provided this court with proof of payment for the record. Accordingly, the appeal 

is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices McCally, Brown and Wise.
#### §§ 17.75-17.78 [Reserved]