alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Stephen C. Jones, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Jones Soda Co.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: 

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared; 

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles; 

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): 

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Dated as of August 8, 2008.
#### §§ 73.6003-73.6005 [Reserved]
#### §§ 22.927-22.943 [Reserved]
§ 95.531 Permissible FRS uses. FRS units are primarily used for short-distance two-way voice communications between individuals. ( a ) *Digital data.* In addition to voice conversations, FRS units may transmit digital data containing location information, or requesting location information from one or more other FRS or GMRS units, or containing a brief text message to another specific GMRS or FRS unit. Digital data transmissions may be initiated by a manual action of the operator or on an automatic or periodic basis, and a FRS unit receiving an interrogation request may automatically respond with its location. *See also* § 95.587(c).
( b ) *One-way communications.* FRS units may be used for one-way communications that are emergency messages, traveler assistance communications, voice pages or brief equipment tests.
( c ) *GMRS stations.* FRS units normally communicate with other FRS units, but may also be used to communicate with General Mobile Radio Service (GMRS) stations.
[82 FR 41104, Aug. 29, 2017, as amended at 86 FR 53564, Sept. 28, 2021]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Dean
Witter Portfolio Strategy Fund L.P. and is qualified in its entirety by
references to such financial instruments.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      87,847,358
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  300,473
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              91,201,711<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                91,201,711<F2>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            28,663,110<F3>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,269,161
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             18,393,949
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         18,393,949
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                18,393,949
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net unrealized
gain on open contracts of $3,053,880.
<F2>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $688,115, incentive fees
payable of $2,587,891, accrued brokerage commission of $141,879,
accrued transaction fees and costs of $10,045, accrued management fees
of $303,128 and common administrative expenses payable of $158,510.
<F3>Total revenues include realized trading revenue of $26,235,502, net
change in unrealized of ($567,233) and interest income of $2,994,841.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  Fahad Syed, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of NetFabric Holdings,
Inc. (the" Company").

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d 15 for the Company and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) [Reserved]

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal
quarter ( the Company's fourth fiscal quarter in case of an annual report) that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Company's auditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting.

August 21, 2006

                                /s/  Fahad Syed
                                --------------------------------
                                Name:  Fahad Syed
                                Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Submitted on record and briefs December 23, 1993,

affirmed May 4, 1994

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*BOBBY LEON SURRATT, *Appellant.*

(C91-1921CR; CA A76258)

874 P2d 106

Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, and Irene B. Taylor, Deputy Public Defender, filed the brief for appellant.

Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and R. Victoria Beyerinck, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Deits and Edmonds, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*746PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals from a judgment requiring him to reimburse the state for court-appointed attorney fees. ORS 161.665(1). He assigns as error the fact that the amount of fees was determined outside his presence after the sentencing hearing was over. At the sentencing hearing, the trial court said that it was adopting the presentence report’s recommendation that defendant pay the fees as a condition of post-prison supervision. The state concedes that the trial court erred when it set the *amount*of attorney fees outside defendant’s presence. *See*ORS 137.030; *see also State v. Stock,*56 Or App 857, 643 P2d 877 (1982). Nonetheless, the state argues that, because defendant did not object during the hearing to the court’s failure to set a specific amount of attorney fees, we should decline to consider the error. ORAP 5.45(2). We agree. Defendant was present at the sentencing hearing and was aware of the court’s intentions. Had he wished a determination of the amount of fees, he could have objected at that time. His silence deprived the trial court of the opportunity to correct any error. Under the circumstances, we decline to consider defendant’s argument.1
      *See State v. Lillie,*124 Or App 49, 52, 860 P2d 895 (1993); *State v. Daniel,*115 Or App 177, 836 P2d 1366 (1992).

Affirmed.

Although the facts in this case are not dissimilar from those in *State v. Stock, supra,*our approach for addressing unpreserved errors has changed since we decided that case. *See State v. Farmer,*317 Or 220, 224, 856 P2d 623 (1993); *Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.,*312 Or 376, 382, 823 P2d 956 (1991).
#### § 90.492 One way paging operations in the 806-824/851-869 MHz and 896-901/935-940 MHz bands.

Paging operations are permitted in these bands only in accordance with §§ 90.645(e) and (f).

[54 FR 4030, Jan. 27, 1989]
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0170Protecting Your Community from Terrorism, Volume 4: The Production and Sharing of IntelligenceThe fourth volume of the Protecting Your Community From Terrorism series discusses the importance of intelligence-led policing and its correlation with problem-oriented policing principles. The report outlines criteria for an effective intelligence function at all levels of government-highlighted by important sidebar contributions from key players in the fields of intelligence and policing. Among the report's key recommendations is a call to more clearly define "intelligence" and what the needs, expectations and responsibilities are of various agencies in the intelligence community and law enforcement profession, as well as a need for a plan to ensure integrated nationwide and regional intelligence sharing mechanisms.By Stephan A. Loyka, Donald A. Faggiani, Clifford KarchmerCategories: Homeland SecurityLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0170Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Feb 2005Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 02:26 (UTC-5) in 0.19 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
Editorial Note on Part 74
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 74 appear at 64 FR 4055, Jan. 27, 1999.

§ 74.682 Station identification. ( a ) Each television broadcast auxiliary station operating with a transmitter output power of 1 watt or more must, when actually transmitting programs, transmit station identification at the beginning and end of each period of operation, and hourly, as close to the hour as feasible, at a natural break in program offerings by one of the following means: ( 1 ) Transmission of its own call sign by visual or aural means or by automatic transmission in international Morse telegraphy.
( 2 ) Visual or aural transmission of the call sign of the TV broadcast station with which it is licensed as an auxiliary.
( 3 ) Visual or aural transmission of the call sign of the TV broadcast station whose signals are being relayed or, where programs are obtained directly from network lines and relayed, the network identification.
( b ) Identification transmissions during operation need not be made when to make such transmission would interrupt a single consecutive speech, play, religious service, symphony concert, or any type of production. In such cases, the identification transmission shall be made at the first interruption of the entertainment continuity and at the conclusion thereof.
( c ) During occasions when a television pickup station is being used to deliver program material for network distribution it may transmit the network identification in lieu of its own or associated TV station call sign during the actual program pickup. However, if it is providing the network feed through its own associated TV broadcast station it shall perform the station identification required by paragraph (a) of this section at the beginning and end of each period of operation.
( d ) A period of operation is defined as a single uninterrupted transmission or a series of intermittent transmissions from a single location or continuous or intermittent transmission from a television pickup station covering a single event from various locations, within a single broadcast day.
( e ) Regardless of the method used for station identification it shall be performed in a manner conducive to prompt association of the signal source with the responsible licensee. In exercising the discretion provided by this rule, licensees are expected to act in a responsible manner to assure that result.
( f ) TV microwave boosters stations will be assigned individual call signs. However, station identification will be accomplished by the retransmission of identification as provided in paragraph (a) of this section.
[31 FR 15488, Dec. 8, 1966; 32 FR 452, Jan. 17, 1967, as amended at 42 FR 36830, July 18, 1977; 43 FR 1951, Jan. 13, 1978; 44 FR 36041, June 20, 1979; 49 FR 7131, Feb. 27, 1984]
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5123 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 706
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5123

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 30 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

     Received; read twice and ordered to be placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To make a technical correction to an Act preempting State economic 
                     regulation of motor carriers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Intrastate Tow and Wrecker Truck 
Transportation Technical Correction Act of 1994''.

SEC. 2. TECHNICAL CORRECTION.

    Section 11501(h)(2) of title 49, United States Code, is amended as 
follows:
            (1) Strike ``and'' after subparagraph (A).
            (2) Strike the period at the end of subparagraph (B) and 
        insert in lieu thereof ``; and''.
            (3) Insert the following new subparagraph at the end 
        thereof:
                    ``(C) does not restrict the regulatory authority of 
                an agency with statewide jurisdiction, insofar as such 
                authority relates to tow trucks or wreckers providing 
                for-hire services.''.

SEC. 3. EXPIRATION.

    The amendment made by section 2 shall cease to be in effect on 
January 1, 1997.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 29, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                     

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5123

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To make a technical correction to an Act preempting State economic 
                     regulation of motor carriers.
```
#### § 87.35 Cancellation of license.

When a station permanently discontinues operation the station license must be canceled in accordance with the procedures set forth in part 1 of this chapter.

[63 FR 68957, Dec. 14, 1998]
§ 73.3617 Information available on the internet. The Media Bureau and each of its Divisions provide information on the internet regarding rules and policies, pending and completed rulemakings, and pending applications. These sites also include copies of public notices and texts of recent decisions. The Media Bureau's address is *http://www.fcc.gov/mb/ ;* the Audio Division's address is *http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio ;* the Video Division's address is *http://www.fcc.gov/mb/video ;* the Policy Division's address is *http://www.fcc.gov/mb/policy ;* and the Industry Analysis Division's address is *http://www.fcc.gov/mb/industry_analysis .* [85 FR 58297, Sept. 18, 2020]
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4935

To provide that recipients of export promotion assistance should meet certain

requirements.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 10, 1994

Mr. JOHNSTON of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred

jointly to the Committees on Foreign Affairs and Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To provide that recipients of export promotion assistance

should meet certain requirements.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REQUIREMENTS FOR RECIPIENTS OF EXPORT

4 PROMOTION ASSISTANCE.

5 The Secretary of Commerce should not provide as6 sistance under any export promotion program to any per7 son unless—

8 (1) the person has—
2

•HR 4935 IH

1 (A) made investments in the United States

2 in research, development, and manufacturing;

3 or

4 (B) employs people in the United States;

5 and

6 (2) either—

7 (A) the company is a United States-owned

8 company; or

9 (B) the company is incorporated in the

10 United States and has a parent company which

11 is incorporated in a country which the Sec12 retary determines—

13 (i) affords to United States-owned

14 companies opportunities, comparable to

15 those afforded to any other company, to

16 participate in joint ventures;

17 (ii) affords to United States-owned

18 companies local investment and market ac19 cess opportunities comparable to those af20 forded to any other company; and

21 (iii) affords adequate and effective

22 protection for the intellectual property

23 rights of United States-owned companies.

24 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

25 For purposes of this Act—
3

•HR 4935 IH

1 (1) the term ‘‘export promotion program’’ has

2 the meaning given that term in section 201(d) of the

3 Export Administration Amendments Act of 1985

4 (15 U.S.C. 4051(d)); and

5 (2) the Secretary shall define such other terms

6 as may be necessary to carry out this section.

Æ