alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Certification Pursuant to
18  USC,  Section  1350,  as  Adopted  Pursuant  to  Sections 302 and 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rubber Technology International, Inc.
(the  "Company")  on  Form  10-  QSB  for  the  quarter  ended May 31, 2002 (the
"Report"),  as  filed  with  the Securities and Exchange Commission, on the date
hereof,  I,  Trevor Webb, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the
best  of  my knowledge, pursuant to 18 USC 1350, as adopted pursuant to '302 and
promulgated  as  18 USC 1350 pursuant to '906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

The  Report  referenced  above  has  been  read and reviewed by the undersigned.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934.

The  Report referenced above does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to makes the statements
made,  in  light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading.

I  acknowledge  that the management of the Company is solely responsible for the
fair presentation in the financial statements of the financial position, results
of  operations  and  cash  flows  of  the  Company in conformity with accounting
principles  generally  accepted  in  the  United  States  of  America.

Based  upon  my  knowledge,  the  financial statements, and other such financial
information  included  in the report, fairly present the financial condition and
results  of  operations  of  the  Company as of and for the period ended May 31,
2002.

In  my  opinion,  the  accompanying  interim  financial  statements, prepared in
accordance  with the instructions for Form 10-QSB, are unaudited and contain all
material  adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments necessary
to  present fairly the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of  the Company for the respective interim periods presented. The current period
results of operations are not necessarily indicative of results which ultimately
will  be  reported  for  the  full  fiscal  year  ending  December  31,  2002.

Additionally, I acknowledge that the Company's Board of Directors and Management
are solely responsible for adopting sound accounting practices, establishing and
maintaining a system of internal control and preventing and detecting fraud. The
Company's  system  of  internal  accounting control is designed to assure, among
other  items, that 1) recorded transactions are valid; 2) valid transactions are
recorded;  and  3)  transactions  are  recorded in the proper period in a timely
manner  to  produce  financial  statements  which  present  fairly the financial
condition,  results  of  operations  and  cash  flows  of  the  Company  for the
respective  periods  being  presented.


/s/ Trevor Webb
Trevor  Webb
Chief  Executive  Officer


Dated: 8/14/02
Exhibit
10.1


CEO
Bonus Plan


Bonus
Calculation


The
Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) of Websense, Inc. (the “Company”) will be
eligible for a target bonus of 100% of his annual salary.  This bonus is based upon the Company meeting
its Billings and/or Operating Income objectives determined by the Company’s
Board of Directors or its Compensation Committee near the beginning of each
fiscal year.


Subject
to discretionary adjustment, one-half of the bonus (50%) is earned if the
Company meets its annual Billings objective and one-half is earned if  the Company achieves its annual Operating
Income objective.  Achievement of at
least 90% of a goal is required for any payment of the portion of the CEO’s
bonus that is based on achievement by the Company of that goal.  Should the Company achieve 90% of its
Billings or Operating Income goals, bonuses for that plan goal will be paid at
half of the target payment for that goal. 
Should the Company achieve 110% of its Billings or Operating Income
goals, bonuses for that plan goal shall be paid at 1.5 times what the CEO would
have been paid on target for that goal. 
Bonuses amounts are prorated for goal achievement between 90% - 110%.


The
Compensation Committee or Board of Directors has the discretion to adjust the
bonus based upon whether the CEO meets individual objectives set for him by the
Board of Directors. The bonus may be adjusted to be a percentage of the bonus,
ranging from 0% - 130% based upon achievement of such performance objectives.


Eligibility


The CEO must be a current employee on the
last day of the fiscal year to be eligible to receive a bonus.  Bonus amounts are based upon actual base
salary paid during the period, exclusive of other payments or bonuses.


The Company reserves the right to change
these terms from time to time as it feels necessary to accomplish its goals,
including as a result of market conditions, personnel, new or different product
offerings and/or corporate restructuring.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Interactive Intelligence, Inc. (the
“Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Stephen R. Head, Chief Financial Officer, Vice President of
Finance and Administration, Secretary and Treasurer of the Registrant, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2,
      fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and





(2)
            The information contained in
      the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.





/s/ Stephen R.
Head


Stephen
R. Head


Chief
Financial Officer, Vice President of Finance and Administration,


Secretary
and Treasurer


(Principal
Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)


May 12,
2008
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Tony Shahbaz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of I/OMagic Corporation on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of I/OMagic Corporation.


                                  By:  /s/ Tony Shahbaz
                                       -----------------
                                  Name:    Tony Shahbaz
                                  Title:   President and
                                           Chief Executive Officer



I, Steve Gillings, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of I/OMagic Corporation on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of I/OMagic Corporation.


                                  By:  /s/ Steve Gillings
                                       ------------------
                                  Name:     Steve Gillings
                                  Title:     Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1
   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Stamps.com Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ken McBride, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
   Date: May 10, 2011
By:
/s/ KEN MCBRIDEKen McBrideChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 90.467 Dispatch points. Dispatch points meeting the requirements of this section need not be specifically authorized; provided, however, that the licensee of any radio station operated from a dispatch point or points shall assume full responsibility for the use and operation of the authorized facilities in compliance with all applicable provisions of law or rule and shall comply with the policy: ( a ) A dispatch point may be linked to the transmitter(s) being operated by private or leased wire line of fixed radio circuits, provided the requirements of § 90.463 are met.
( b ) No telephone position in the public, switched, telephone network will be treated as a dispatch point within the meaning or intent of this section.
( c ) Operation of transmitting facilities from dispatch points is permitted only when the control operator at a fixed control point in the system is on duty and at no other time.
Editorial Note on Part 97
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 97 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 97.221 Automatically controlled digital station. ( a ) This rule section does not apply to an auxiliary station, a beacon station, a repeater station, an earth station, a space station, or a space telecommand station.
( b ) A station may be automatically controlled while transmitting a RTTY or data emission on the 6 m or shorter wavelength bands, and on the 28.120-28.189 MHz, 24.925-24.930 MHz, 21.090-21.100 MHz, 18.105-18.110 MHz, 14.0950-14.0995 MHz, 14.1005-14.112 MHz, 10.140-10.150 MHz, 7.100-7.105 MHz, or 3.585-3.600 MHz segments.
( c ) Except for channels specified in § 97.303(h), a station may be automatically controlled while transmitting a RTTY or data emission on any other frequency authorized for such emission types provided that: ( 1 ) The station is responding to interrogation by a station under local or remote control; and
( 2 ) No transmission from the automatically controlled station occupies a bandwidth of more than 500 Hz.
[60 FR 26001, May 16, 1995, as amended at 72 FR 3082, Jan. 24, 2007; 77 FR 5412, Feb. 3, 2012]
§ 87.319 Scope of service. Aviation support stations are used for the following types of operations: ( a ) Pilot training;
( b ) Coordination of soaring activities between gliders, tow aircraft and land stations;
( c ) Coordination of activities between free balloons or lighter-than-air aircraft and ground stations;
( d ) Coordination between aircraft and aviation service organizations located on an airport concerning the safe and efficient portal-to-portal transit of the aircraft, such as the types of fuel and ground services available; and
( e ) Promotion of safety of life and property.
<PAGE>


                                                             EXHIBIT 21

CELADON GROUP, INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


SUBSIDIARY NAME                                  INCORPORATION JURISDICTION
---------------                                  --------------------------
<S>                                              <C>


Celadon Trucking Services, Inc.                             NJ

Celadon Real Estate Corp.                                   DE

Celadon Trucking Services of                                IN
    Indiana, Inc.

Celadon Transportation, LLP                                 IN

Celadon Acquisition Corp.                                   IN

Celadon Mexicana, S.A. de C.V.                              MX

Celadon Logistics, Inc.                                     DE

Celadon Jacky Maeder Company                                NY

Celadon Jacky Maeder (U.K.) Ltd.                            UK

Cheetah Brokerage Co.                                       NE

Cheetah Transportation, Inc.                                DE

Gerth Transport, Ltd.                                        ON

Guestair Ltd.                                               UK

International Freight Holding Corp.                         DE

JML Freight Forwarding, Inc.                                NY

Leasing Servisio, S.A. de C.V.                              MX

Randy Express, Ltd.                                         NY

Randy International, U.K.                                   UK

RIL Acquisition Corp.                                       DE

RIL Group, Ltd.                                             DE

RIL, Inc.                                                   DE

Servicios de Transportacion Jaguar, S.A. de C.V.            MX

Wellingmuft Holding Co.                                     NY

</TABLE>

                               audit98/sublist
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4974

To amend the Mississippi River Corridor Study Commission Act of 1989

to extend the term of the commission established by such Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 17, 1994

Mr. EVANS (for himself, Mr. CLAY, Mr. JEFFERSON, Mr. BARLOW, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. LEACH, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr. COSTELLO, Mr. OBERSTAR,

Mr. WHEAT, Mr. BAKER of Louisiana Mr. SANGMEISTER, Mr. MONTGOMERY, Mrs. LLOYD, and Mr. FORD of Tennessee) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

A BILL

To amend the Mississippi River Corridor Study Commission

Act of 1989 to extend the term of the commission established by such Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TERM OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER

4 CORRIDOR STUDY COMMISSION.

5 Section 9(b) of the Mississippi River Corridor Study

6 Commission Act of 1989 (Public Law 101–398; 104 Stat.

7 859) is amended by striking ‘‘3 years after the date of
2

•HR 4974 IH

1 the first meeting of the Commission,’’ and inserting ‘‘June

2 30, 1996,’’.

Æ
#### § 13.2 Purpose of regulations.

The regulations contained in this part provide uniform rules, conditions, and procedures for the application for and the issuance, denial, suspension, revocation, and general administration of all permits issued pursuant to this subchapter B.

[54 FR 38147, Sept. 14, 1989]
No. 11-9104.

#### Pelletier *v.*United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 90.1307 Licensing. ( a ) The 3650-3700 MHz band is licensed on the basis of non-exclusive nationwide licenses. Non-exclusive nationwide licenses will serve as a prerequisite for registering individual fixed and base stations. A licensee cannot operate a fixed or base station before registering it under its license and licensees must delete registrations for unused fixed and base stations.
( b ) The Commission shall issue no new licenses or license renewals under this section after April 17, 2015, except as specified in paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) If a license issued under this Section expires between April 17, 2015 and April 17, 2020, the licensee may request a one-time renewal and the Commission may renew that license for a term ending no later than April 17, 2020.
( d ) Licenses that were issued after January 8, 2013 will be afforded protection from harmful interference from Citizens Broadband Radio Service users pursuant to § 90.1338 until April 17, 2020 regardless of their expiration date.
[80 FR 36222, June 23, 2015]
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Hassan N. Natha, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Jones Soda Co. 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):

a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b.any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Dated as of May 15, 2006.
**Exhibit 10.13**

 

**Amendment to the**

**Toys “R” Us, Inc. 2001 Stock Option and Performance Incentive Plan**

 

The Toys “R” Us, Inc. 2001 Stock Option and Performance Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended, effective as of March 2, 2004, as follows. 

 

1. The last sentence of Section 2.2 of the Plan, which reads as follows: 

 

“Shares of Common Stock (i) withheld by the Company in payment of theexercise price of options or taxes relating to awards, or (ii) surrendered to the Company in payment of the exercise price of options or taxes relating to awards, will be available for awards under the Plan.” 

 

shall expire as of June 5, 2011, which is the day prior to the tenth anniversary of the datethat the Plan was last approved by the stockholders of the Company, and shall thereafter be replaced with the following sentence: 

 

“Shares of Common Stock withheld by the Company in payment of the exercise price of options or in payment of taxes relating to awards (other thanRestricted Shares or other awards in which shares of Common Stock have already been issued to the participant) will be available for subsequent awards under the Plan.” 

 

2. The following proviso shall be added at the end of the penultimate sentence of Section 2.2 of the Plan: 

 

“provided, however, that Restricted Shares or other awards in whichshares of Common Stock have already been issued and which are subsequently converted to a cash settlement on or after June 5, 2011 shall not be available for subsequent awards under the Plan.” 

 

3. Except as specifically amended hereby, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect asprior to this Amendment. 

 

The Company has caused this Amendment to be executedas of the day and year first above written.
#### DAVID M. JONES, Appellant, *v.*JAMES BENEDICT and others, Survivors, etc., Respondents.

*Application of payments.*

Appeal from a judgment in favor of tbe defendants, entered upon tbe report of a referee.

The main question involved in the case aróse out of a controversy as to tbe application of payments which should be made upon certain indebtednesses primarily owing by W. Erank Witherell, on one of which the plaintiff and other persons, including W. H. II. Withered, were liable with W. Erank Withered, either as sureties for him or as joint debtors, and on the other of which they were not. W. H. II. Withered had pledged certain securities as collateral to such latter indebtedness — from the sale of which latter securities the money for the payments in question was to be derived.

The court at General Term, after stating the facts which were very voluminous, said :

“We have, then, a case where several officers and stockholders of a mining company have incurred a liability for the benefit of the company, and another person, not a stockholder, is also liable thereon. This person, not a stockholder, has pledged property of his own to secure both this liability and also another liability to the same creditor. The officers of the company, thus dable, have been indemnified by their stockholders. Now they ask that the property of this person, not a stockholder, shad be so appded as to relieve them from the liability, against which they are indemnified. Thus, this person, not a stockholder, would be compelled *129to have bis property applied to that debt, against which the plaintiff and the other officers are indemnified, while he would receive no benefit from their indemnity, but would have to pay the other liability for which his property was pledged. We cannot see that this would be equitable. The plaintiff* says that (in round numbers) twenty thirty-fifths of the avails of property belonging to W. H. H. Witherell, and pledged by him, should apply on a debt for which (as he says) he and the other indorsers and the two Witherells are liable as *quasi*sureties. But the plaintiff and the other indorsers are indemnified by the real parties in interest. And upon the same equitable view, W. H. H. Witherell could insist that this indemnity be first enforced to its full amount, so that his property should be entirely relieved.

“It would be inequitable that the plaintiff should neglect to enforce the indemity which he holds, and which, if enforced, would relieve W. H. H. Witherell, and then should insist that the property of W. H. H. Witherell should be used to relieve him, and thus to relieve the I'eal parties in interest.

“No appeal is taken by the defendants. We see nothing in the exceptions to evidence which requires a new trial.”

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

*Leslie TK Bussell,*for the appellant. *Matthew Hale,*for the respondents.

Present — Learxed, P. J., BoardmaN and Bocees, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.