alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 96.57 Registration, authentication, and authorization of Citizens Broadband Radio Service Devices. ( a ) An SAS must register, authenticate, and authorize operations of CBSDs consistent with this part.
( b ) CBSDs composed of a network of base and fixed stations may employ a subsystem for aggregating and communicating all required information exchanges between the SAS and CBSDs.
( c ) An SAS must also verify that the FCC identifier (FCC ID) of any CBSD seeking access to its services is valid prior to authorizing it to begin providing service. A list of devices with valid FCC IDs and the FCC IDs of those devices is to be obtained from the Commission's Equipment Authorization System.
( d ) An SAS must not authorize operation of CBSDs within Protection Zones except as set forth in § 96.15.
( e ) An SAS must calculate and enforce PAL Protection Areas consistent with § 96.25 and such calculation and enforcement shall be consistent across all SASs.
[80 FR 36222, June 23, 2015, as amended at 81 FR 49069, July 26, 2016]
§ 27.1606 Aggregation of 3450-3550 MHz band licenses. ( a ) 3.45 GHz Service licensees may aggregate up to 40 megahertz of 3450-3550 MHz band licenses across both license categories in any service area at any given time for four years after the close of the auction. After four years post-auction, no such aggregation limit on 3450-3550 MHz licenses shall apply.
( b ) The criteria in § 20.22(b) of this chapter will apply in order to attribute partial ownership and other interests for the purpose of applying the aggregation limit in paragraph (a) of this section.
# **EXHIBIT 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interactive Intelligence,Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Stephen R. Head, Chief Financial Officer, Vice President of Finance andAdministration, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully  complies withthe  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The  information contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| /s/ Stephen R. Head                                                                                                                                             |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Stephen R. Head                                                                                                                                                 |   |
| Chief Financial Officer, Vice President of Finance and  Administration, Secretary and Treasurer  (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |   |
|                                                                                                                                                            |
| August 6, 2004                                                                                                                                                  |   |

 

----

----
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P212Drug-Impaired Driving POP GuideDrug-impaired driving demands police, legislative, and community attention because of the potential harms it causes. Many of the problems associated with drug-impaired driving are similar to those associated with drunk driving. However, recent evidence suggests that the prevalence of drug-impaired driving may be equal to, or perhaps higher, than drunk driving. Drug-Impaired Driving will provide an overview of the problem of drug-impaired driving review factors that increase its risks and negative outcomes. It then identifies a series of questions to help you analyze your local drug-impaired-driving problem. Finally, it reviews a number of responses to the problem and summarizes what is known about these responses from evaluative research and police practice.By Joseph B. KuhnsCategories: Nonviolent Crime • POP Center ResourceLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p212Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Aug 2012Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 02:19 (UTC-5) in 0.19 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
#### § 90.751 Minor modifications of Phase I, non-nationwide licenses.

Phase I non-nationwide licensees will be given an opportunity to seek modification of their license to relocate their initially authorized base station, i.e., locate their base station at a site other than its initially authorized location. The conditions under which modifications will be granted and the procedures for applying for license modifications are described in §§ 90.753, 90.757 and 1.929 of this chapter. For CMRS licensees, these modifications will be treated as minor modifications in accordance with § 1.929 of this chapter.

[63 FR 68973, Dec. 14, 1998]
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 161 (Monday, August 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 50207]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-20258]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Twenty-Second Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 203, Unmanned 
Aircraft Systems

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Meeting notice of RTCA Special Committee 203, Unmanned Aircraft 
Systems.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
twenty-second meeting of RTCA Special Committee 203, Unmanned Aircraft 
Systems.

DATES: The meeting will be held September 11-13, 2012, from 9 a.m.-5 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at NASA Ames Conference Center, 500 
Severyns Road, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, 
(650) 604-2082, email: hmoses@rtca.org.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-
9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 203. The agenda will 
include the following:

Tuesday, September 11, 2012

 Introductory Remarks and Introductions
 Approval of Twenty First Plenary Summary
 Chair/Leadership Updates
 Designated Federal Official (DFO) Update
 Schedule Status
 Workgroup Updates
 Other Business
 Date, Place, and Time for Plenary Twenty-Three
 Plenary Adjourns

Work Group Breakout Sessions Will Follow: Tuesday Afternoon--September 
11th Through Thursday Noon--September 13th

    Note:  Foreign nationals must give 20 business days notice 
to Alan Hobbs at alan.hobbs@nasa.gov or phone: 650-604-1336 to attend.
     More information on meeting location with maps, nearby 
hotels, and restaurants can be found at http://naccenter.arc.nasa.gov/index.php.
     Dress Business Casual.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on August 10, 2012.
David Sicard,
Manager, Business Operations Branch, Federal Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-20258 Filed 8-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]



# United States Court of Appeals

**For the First Circuit**

No. 99-2098 UNITED STATES, Appellee,
v. MAX DEE JENKINS, Defendant, Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Joseph L. Tauro, U.S. District Judge ]
Before Selya, Circuit Judge , Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge , and Boudin, Circuit Judge .

Stephen B. Hrones and Hrones & Garrityon brief for appellant. Dona ld K. Stern , United States Attorney, and Nadine Pellegrini , Assistant U.S. Attorney, on brief for appellee.

June 13, 2000-2- Per Curiam . After a thorough review of the record and of the parties’ submissions, we affirm appellant’s conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1).

The evidence tended to show that appellant Max Dee Jenkins (“Jenkins”) lived at the residence from which the firearms were confiscated, because he had purchased and moved into the residence with his companion nine months earlier; when released from jail and restrained from visiting the residence, he had nowhere to live except a friend’s house; and approximately one month later, he returned to the residence to retrieve clothing and other personal items (including a large cache of ammunition). Constructive possession may be established by evidence showing that the defendant lived at the residence where the ob jects in question were found immediately prior to their discovery by police. See United States v. Vargas , 945 F.2d 426, 427-28 (1 stCir. 1991).

Further, the evidence tended to establish that Jenkins owned the firearms in question. After the firearms-3-

w ere confiscated, he began efforts almost immediately to retrieve them, including devising a deceptive plan whereby the guns would be shipped out of state for his retrieval. Further, he told both a licensed firearms dealer and the local police that the weapons were his. Ownership is “highlyrelevant” to the question of possession. United States v. Rogers , 41 F.3d 25, 30 (1 stCir. 1994).

Taking this evidence in a light most favorable to the government, United States v. Smith , 101 F.3d 202, 215 (1 stCir. 1996), we think a rational jury could conclude that appellant constructively possessed the firearms during the time charged in the indictment. See U nited States v. Collins , 60 F.3d 4, 8 (1 stCir. 1995) (conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) affirmed where firearms were found at defendant’s residence and defendant made statements tending to show he owned the firearms). The lower court did not err in denying defendant’s motion for acquittal under Fed.R.Crim.P. 29.

Affirmed. 1 stCir. Loc. R. 27(c).
§ 18.76 Presiding officer. ( a ) Upon publication of the notice of hearing pursuant to § 18.74, the Office of Hearings and Appeals shall appoint a presiding officer pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 3105. No individual who has any conflict of interest, financial or otherwise, shall serve as presiding officer in such proceeding.
( b ) The presiding officer, in any proceeding under this subpart, shall have power to: ( 1 ) Change the time and place of the hearing and adjourn the hearing;
( 2 ) Evaluate direct testimony submitted pursuant to these regulations, make a preliminary determination of the issues, conduct a prehearing conference to determine the issues for the hearing agenda, and cause to be published in the Federal Register a final hearing agenda;
( 3 ) Rule upon motions, requests and admissibility of direct testimony;
( 4 ) Administer oaths and affirmations, question witnesses and direct witnesses to testify;
( 5 ) Modify or waive any rule (after notice) when determining no party will be prejudiced;
( 6 ) Receive written comments and hear oral arguments;
( 7 ) Render a recommended decision; and
( 8 ) Do all acts and take all measures, including regulation of media coverage, for the maintenance of order at and the efficient conduct of the proceeding.
( c ) In case of the absence of the original presiding officer or his inability to act, the powers and duties to be performed by the original presiding officer under this part in connection with a proceeding may, without abatement of the proceeding, be assigned to any other presiding officer by the Office of Hearings and Appeals unless otherwise ordered by the Director.
( d ) The presiding officer shall withdraw from the proceeding upon his own motion or upon the filing of a motion by a party under § 18.76(e) if he deems himself disqualified under recognized canons of judicial ethics.
( e ) A presiding officer may be requested to withdraw at any time prior to the recommended decision. If there is filed by a party in good faith a timely and sufficient affidavit alleging the presiding officer's personal bias, malice, conflict of interest or other basis which might result in prejudice to a party, the hearing shall recess. The Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals shall immediately determine the matter as a part of the record and decision in the proceeding, after making such investigation or holding such hearings, or both, as he may deem appropriate in the circumstances.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED** **PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Interactive Intelligence, Inc. (the
      “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2007 as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I,  Donald E. Brown, M.D., Chairman of the Board, President
      and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1,
                fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The information contained in
                the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
                the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Registrant.








/s/
      Donald E. Brown, M.D.


Donald
      E.
      Brown, M.D.


President
      and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
      Executive Officer)


August
      9,
      2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          90,619
<SECURITIES>                                    82,777
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,921
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,000
<INVENTORY>                                      2,091
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               208,291
<PP&E>                                          48,070
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,091
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 448,945
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          282,001
<BONDS>                                         50,926
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           330
<OTHER-SE>                                     100,427
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   448,945
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,070,508<F1>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,148,475
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 8,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,257
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (84,224)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (22,860)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (61,287)<F2>
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (61,287)<F2>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.86)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.86)
<FN>
<F1>OPERATING REVENUE AND OTHER INCOME
<F2>INCLUDES LOSS OF CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARY (MINORITY INTEREST)
</FN>


</TABLE>
Calendar No. 548

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4812

AN ACT

To direct the Administrator of General Services to

Francisco, California, and for other purposes.acquire by transfer the Old U.S. Mint in San

AUGUST 9 (legislative day, AUGUST 8), 1994

Placed on the calendar
II

Calendar No. 548

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4812

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 9 (legislative day, AUGUST 8), 1994

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar

AN ACT

To direct the Administrator of General Services to acquire

by transfer the Old U.S. Mint in San Francisco, California, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4812 PCS

1 SECTION 1. OLD U.S. MINT, SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA.

2 Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment

3 of this Act, the Administrator of General Services shall

4 take such actions as may be necessary to acquire by trans5 fer, without consideration, the property referred to as the

6 ‘‘Old U.S. Mint’’, located at Fifth and Mission Streets in

7 San Francisco, California, together with any improve8 ments, structures, and fixtures located on the property.

Passed the House of Representatives August 8,

1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
EXHIBIT
32.2: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of China Water Group, Inc.
(the “Company”) certifies that:




1.           The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended September
30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  April
      13, 2009
              /s/ Ding RencaiDing
      Rencai, Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Anne Wick, EPA Diesel Engine Consent Decree Coordinator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (Mail Code 2242A), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460;  e-mail:                         *wick.anne@epa.gov.*

Karen S. Dworkin,

Assistant Chief, Environment & Natural Resources Division, Environmental Enforcement Section.

[FR Doc. 06-6943 Filed 8-15-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
No. 11-8635.

#### Martin *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
§ 69.607 Disbursement of Carrier Common Line residue. ( a ) The association shall compute a monthly net balance for each member telephone company that is not an average schedule company. If such a company has a negative net balance, the association shall bill that amount to such company. If such a company has a positive net balance, the association shall disburse that amount to such company.
( b ) The net balance for such a company shall be computed by multiplying a hypothetical net balance for such a company by a factor that is computed by dividing the Carrier Common Line residue by the sum of the hypothetical net balances for such companies.
( c ) The hypothetical net balance for each company shall be the sum of the hypothetical net balances for each access element. Such hypothetical net balances shall be computed in accordance with §§ 69.608 to 69.610.
[48 FR 10358, Mar. 11, 1983, as amended at 51 FR 42237, Nov. 24, 1986]
No. 11-5490.

#### Linden *v.*District Council 1707-AFSCME et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-5740.

#### Melton *v.*Ger Taylor Gardens, LLC.

Ct. App. Ohio, Cuyahoga County. Certiorari denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

STEVEN TAFT,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 296 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 31st day of January, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.

Justice McCaffery did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
#### § 80.31 Cancellation of license.

Wireless telecommunications carriers subject to this part must comply with the discontinuance of service provisions of part 63 of this chapter.

[63 FR 68955, Dec. 14, 1998]