alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Regulatory Evaluation 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

Add /he wvrk hours. parts c.:osl, and number(!/ U.S. registered pmducts to the tahfe he/ow. When you are 

.finished. dick on the "Update Fields., hullon 10 awomatical/y.fl/l i11the totals. 

Update Fields I 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) 

D (include cost (labor+ u.s. for U.S. Fleet o not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

R&R 

30 NA 22 l I 

f\(11 tj (Ill (• (Ill 

n 1111 (I ttl! ' (I I(J 

nn· fill) I 'I 

q (• 

I (t I I 

J II I lj 

p I J •,I 

t I 'I 1) (I 

(Ill I I ; ~ 'I I 

u .. •l •ll ~ I j ' 

0 lj •t 

(I 'I r 1{) 11, Ill 

f'(l f) 11(1 '' ')I) 

I' (l I \)Ill 1 (J I 

I !I ttl 

' '! I 

... II ,Ill( 

The known number of products in compliance: Number 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $56, 100 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) Warrant~ 

On-Condition Costs: • 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

testing, and close- replacement) up) 

Inspection ~ ' I !}t. 

•• (l, 

.... I'' n• 
(I (til 

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 

Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? ·-

YES* 0 NO l8l 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? ·-

YES* 0 NO l8l 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

e ither a Yes or No answer. ~ 

YES 0 NO l8l 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could aftect intrastate av iation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? -

YES* 0 NO l8l 

*Explanation:
1/21/2015 MARTINEZ, ROBE This is to advise 

### file the original OFgiCt^JvIQTJC^RWMTM'RT-eF-CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS •P.O: BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS78711 

# OFFICIALBUSINE""* ^3PQ^ STATS ©F TEXAS PENALTY FOR PRWME 0 2 1M ^ PP=^0 0004279596 JAN22 2015 Ai~ki '-oRV.TWV"- MAILED FROM ZIP.CODf. 78701 

### Ct. No. 307125 WR-33,162-1* 

### ^denied^ without written order motion for leave to

Mandamus 

# _*tinezjr. 03113^? '<Xes.YO*, «y-|£ # 1931397 

# &

Abel Acosta, Clerk



# i
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0838Collaborative Reform Initiative: Interim Final Report of the Philadelphia Police DepartmentThis summary report details how the Philadelphia Police Department (PPD) has made significant progress toward the implementation of the 91 Collaborative Reform recommendations included in the initial assessment report regarding the PPD's use of force and officer-involved shootings. The assessment team has determined that 91 percent of the recommended reforms are either complete, partially complete, or in progress as of the delivery of this report. This summary of the PPD's participation in the Collaborative Reform Initiative for Technical Assistance demonstrates that although some of the Philadelphia Collaborative Reform Initiative recommendations have not yet been completed, the PPD is committed to continuing their progress toward implementing the recommendations. As a result of these efforts, the PPD is among the leading police agencies in the country regarding their monitoring, assessment, and improvement of all aspects of police use of force.By James "Chip" Coldren, Ashley Shultz, James LaRochelle, Blake McClellandCategories: Police OperationsLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0838Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Jan 2017Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 00:53 (UTC-5) in 0.20 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
#### § 27.1135 Protection of non-Federal Government Meteorological-Satellite operations.

AWS licensees operating fixed stations in the 1710-1755 MHz band, if notified that such stations are causing interference to meteorological-satellite earth receivers operating in the Meteorological-Satellite Service in the 1675-1710 MHz band, shall be required to modify the stations' location and/or technical parameters as necessary to eliminate the interference.
An official website of the United States government "Here is how you know"


Official websites use.gov  .gov
 Secure .gov websites use HTTPS 
	A lock https:


Menu
        ABOUTDirector's Corner
Contact COPS
Community Policing in Action: Photo Contest
The L. Anthony Sutin Award for Innovative Law Enforcement and Community Partnerships
Photo Galleries
Subscribe
NEWSPress Releases
Executive Order on Advancing Effective, Accountable Policing and Criminal Justice Practices to Enhance Public Trust and Public Safety
GRANTSSolicitation Finder
Funding Opportunities
How To Apply
Grants Deadlines and Announcement Dates
Compliance and Reporting
Program Documents
Grantee Success Stories
Award Announcement Map
RESOURCESCritical Incident Review: Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, TX
National Blue Alert Network
Resource Center/Publications
E-Newsletter: Community Policing Dispatch
Podcast Series: The Beat
Video Series: What’s New in Blue
Tribal Community Policing Resources
Community Policing Topics
Community Violence Intervention
Addressing Human TraffickingLabor Trafficking
Recruitment, Hiring & Retention
Filing a Civil Rights Complaint
TRAINING & TECHNICAL ASSISTANCECollaborative Reform InitiativeCRI-TAC
Critical Response
Organizational Assessments
COPS Training Portal
Training
ACCOUNT ACCESS
 SEARCH HERE: Search form
    Search
 
  2016 Community Policing in Action Photo Contest                    
		                                January 5, 2016
 SPOTLIGHT
 SUBSCRIBE TO EMAIL UPDATES
 
 SUBSCRIBE TO CP DISPATCH
 ABOUT Contact COPS
	Community Policing in Action: Photo Contest
	The L. Anthony Sutin Award for Innovative Law Enforcement and Community Partnerships
	Photo Galleries
	Subscribe NEWS Press Releases
	Executive Order on Safe Policing for Safer Communities
 GRANTS Compliance & Reporting
	Program Documents
	Grantees
	Grantee Success Stories
	Agency Portal Video Tutorials
	Award Announcement Map RESOURCES National Blue Alert Network
	Recent Releases
	Resource Center/Publications
	E-Newsletter: Community Policing Dispatch
	Podcast Series: The Beat
	Video Series: What’s New in Blue
	Tribal Community Policing Resources
	Addressing Human Trafficking
	Community Policing Topics
	Recruitment, Hiring & Retention
 TRAINING & TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Collaborative Reform Initiative for Technical Assistance Center
	COPS Training Portal
	Training ACCOUNT ACCESS ACCESSIBILITY INFORMATION
 FOIA Language Access Plan Legal Policies and Disclaimers No Fear Act Open Government Plain Writing Privacy Policy USA.gov Whistleblower Protection Social Media Department of Justice Accessibility
Adcote 49

- 221 November 2010 Page 1 of 2Adcote 49

- 221 November 2010 Page 2 of 2

Safety, Handling and Storage

 Support and ground containers before opening, dispensing, mixing, pouring, or emptying. Open

with non

- sparking tools. If container is warm, open bung slowly to release the internal pressure.

 Wash thoroughly after handling. Wash contaminated goggles, face shield, and gloves. Professionally launder contaminated clothing before re

- use.

 ATTENTION! Container can be hazardous when empty. Follow label warnings even after container is empty. Do not use heat, sparks, open flames , torches, or cigarettes on or near empty containers. Do not reuse empty container without professional cleaning.

 Refer to Material Safety Data Sheet for more information.

Alcohols and similar materials containing active hydrogen can react with Adcote 49

- 221 adhesive causing inadequate cure.

Adcote 49

- 221 can react or interact with other components of laminations. Retained solvents, slip additives,

anti

- block agents, and contaminated solvents are some of the components that may cause property changes of the film and/or adhesive.

Recommended Operating Conditions Application Method Direct gravure Application Cylinder 150

- 165 line Application Solids 30

- 40% Dry Adhesive Weight 1.0

- 1.5 lb /ream Drying Web Temperature 150

- 180  F Lamination Temperature 140

- 180  F

Cure Time 7

- 10 days at 70  F Slitting/Rewinding Time 24

- 48 hrs at 70  F Cleaning solvent Methyl ethyl ketone



### ______________________________________________________________________ Adcote is a registered trademark of Rohm and Haas Company

. These suggestions and data are based on information we believe to be reliable. They are offered in good faith, but without guarantee, as conditions and method of use of our products are beyond our control. We recommend that the prospective user

determi ne the suitability of our materials and suggestions before adopting them on a commercial scale.

Suggestions for uses of our products or the inclusion of descriptive material from patents and the citation of specific paten ts in this publication should not be understood as recommending the use of our products in violation of any patent or as permission or license to use any patents of the Rohm and Haas Company.

Visit us at http://www.rohmhaas.com/Adh esivesSealants Rohm and Haas Company, Midwest Technical Center, 2531 Technology Drive, Suite 301, Elgin, IL 60124

Phone: 847

- 649

- 3800 Fax: 847

- 649

- 3760
Case 16-27198 Doc 1 Filed 08/24/16 Entered 08/24/16 13:57:29 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 9
Case 16-27198 Doc 1 Filed 08/24/16 Entered 08/24/16 13:57:29 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 9
Case 16-27198 Doc 1 Filed 08/24/16 Entered 08/24/16 13:57:29 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 9
Case 16-27198 Doc 1 Filed 08/24/16 Entered 08/24/16 13:57:29 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 9
Case 16-27198 Doc 1 Filed 08/24/16 Entered 08/24/16 13:57:29 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 9
Case 16-27198 Doc 1 Filed 08/24/16 Entered 08/24/16 13:57:29 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 9
Case 16-27198 Doc 1 Filed 08/24/16 Entered 08/24/16 13:57:29 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 9
Case 16-27198 Doc 1 Filed 08/24/16 Entered 08/24/16 13:57:29 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 9
Case 16-27198 Doc 1 Filed 08/24/16 Entered 08/24/16 13:57:29 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 9
#### §§ 95.781-95.785 [Reserved]
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4970 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4970

   To amend vaccine injury compensation portion of the Public Health 
   Service Act to permit a petition for compensation to be submitted 
           within 48 months of the first symptoms of injury.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 16, 1994

 Mr. Solomon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend vaccine injury compensation portion of the Public Health 
   Service Act to permit a petition for compensation to be submitted 
           within 48 months of the first symptoms of injury.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TIME LIMIT.

    Section 2116(a)(2) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C 
300aa-16) is amended by striking ``36 months'' and inserting ``48 
months''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 11-5769.

#### Matos *v.*Kerestes, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Mahanoy, et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            College of Information and Cyberspace
                    National Defense University
                CIC
        Search
                    Search CIC:
                        Search
                Search CIC:
                    Search
    Home

    About 
        Mission & Vision

    Faculty & Staff

    Fact Sheet

    Alumni

    Internships

    FAQ

    Admissions 
        Eligibility Requirements

    Admissions Calendar

    Application Instructions

    Apply Online

    International Students

    Academics 
        Graduate Catalog

    M.S. in Strategic Information and Cyberspace Studies
        
        JPME Master's Degree

    Cyber Workforce Master's Degree (Part Time)

    Leadership Development Programs

    Graduate Certificates

    Academic Partners

    Current Students 
        JPME II  Incoming Students

    LDP Incoming Students

    Student Registration

    Bring Your Own Device

    IA Compliance

    Completion Procedures / Order Transcripts

    Student Services and Resources

    Events
    
        Cyber Beacon

    Cyber PME Colloquium

    Hopper Award

    Lecture Series

    CYBERCOM Symposium

    NEWS

    UC2
    
        About

    Events

    Work With Us

    Center for Cybersecurity
    
        About

    Cybersecurity Center POC

    Cybersecurity Supporting Faculty

    CAE-CDE CISO Certificate Program

    Cybersecurity Trending News

    Cyber Labs
        
        Ethical Hacking

    Critical Infrastructure - SCADA

    Cyber Exercises
        
        Tabletop Exercise

    Cyber Competitions

    Cyber Resources and Awareness

    Stakeholder / Industry Advisory Council

    Contact 
        Contact Us

    Directions

    Access to Ft. McNair

    Map of Ft. McNair  Download
 Details
 Share
 News
 The Chancellor's Speaker Series 2021 By Jonathan Rauch
                Chancellor Speaker Series
 
 SHARE
 PRINT
 Previous Story
 Next Story
 National Defense University


College of Information and Cyberspace

300 Fifth Ave., Bldg. 62
Fort Lesley J. McNair
Washington, DC 20319-5066

202-685-6300
                    Stay Connected
                DOD Privacy & Security
 DOD Links Disclaimer
 DOD Social Media Policy
 DOD Web Policy
 FOIA
 NDU System of Records Notice
 NDU Privacy & Security Notice
 No FEAR Act
 Open GOV
 Plain Writing Act
 Section 508
 Small Business Act
 USA.gov
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE
13a-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of American Wagering, Inc. (the
Company) for the year ended January 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), each of us certifies as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, to our respective knowledge, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic versions of this written statement, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



By:

/s/ Victor SalernoName:

Victor SalernoTitle:

President, Chief Executive Officer, ChiefOperating Officer, and Chairman of the Board of DirectorsDate:

May 1, 2006By:

/s/ Timothy F. LockingerName:

Timothy F. LockingerTitle:

Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer, and DirectorDate:

May 1, 2006
#### § 69.151 Applicability.

This subpart shall apply only to telephone companies subject to the price cap regulations set forth in part 61 of this chapter.
§ 90.237 Interim provisions for operation of radioteleprinter and radiofacsimile devices. These provisions authorize and govern the use of radioteleprinter and radiofacsimile devices for base station use (other than on mobile-only or paging-only frequencies) in all radio pools and services except Radiolocation in this part. ( a ) Information must be submitted with an application to establish that the minimum separation between a proposed radioteleprinter or radiofacsimile base station and the nearest co-channel base station of another licensee operating a voice system is 120 km (75 mi) for a single frequency mode of operation, or 56 km (35 mi) for two frequency mode of operation. Where this minimum mileage separation cannot be achieved, either agreement to the use of F1B, F2B, F3C, G1B, G2B or G3C emission must be received from all existing co-channel licensees using voice emission within the applicable mileage limits, or if agreement was not received, the licensee of the radioteleprinter or radiofacsimile system is responsible for eliminating any interference with preexisting voice operations. New licensees of voice operations will be expected to share equally any frequency occupied by established radioteleprinter or radiofacsimile operations.
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) Transmitters certificated under this part for use of G3E or F3E emission may also be used for F1B, F2B, F3C, G1B, G2B or G3C emission for radioteleprinter or radiofacsimile, provided the keying signal is passed through the low pass audio frequency filter required for G3E or F3E emission. The transmitter must be so adjusted and operated that the instantaneous frequency deviation does not exceed the maximum value allowed for G3E or F3E.
( d ) Frequencies will not be assigned exclusively for F1B, F2B, F3C, G1B, G2B or G3C emission for radioteleprinter or radiofacsimile (except where specifically provided for in the frequency limitations).
( e ) The requirements in this part applicable to the use of G3E or F3E emission are also applicable to the use of F1B, F2B, F3C, G1B, G2B or G3C emission for radioteleprinter and radiofacsimile transmissions.
( f ) The station identification required by § 90.425 must be given by voice or Morse code.
( g ) For single sideband operations in accordance with § 90.266, transmitters certified under this part for use of J3E emission may also be used for A2B and F2B emissions for radioteleprinter transmissions. Transmitters certified under this part for use of J3E emission in accordance with §§ 90.35(c)(1)(A), 90.35(c)(1)(B), 90.35(c)(1)(C) and 90.257(a) may also be used for A1B, A2B, F1B, F2B, J2B, and A3C emissions to provide standby backup circuits for operational telecommunications circuits which have been disrupted, where so authorized in other sections of this part.
[43 FR 54791, Nov. 22, 1978, as amended at 49 FR 48712, Dec. 14, 1984; 51 FR 14998, Apr. 22, 1986; 62 FR 18927, Apr. 17, 1997; 63 FR 36610, July 7, 1998; 63 FR 68965, Dec. 14, 1998; 72 FR 35195, June 27, 2007]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of Mercury Interactive Corporation (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

I, Anthony Zingale,
Chief Executive Officer of Mercury Interactive Corporation, certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

(2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Mercury Interactive Corporation.



|                       
|-----------------------
|Date: October 5, 2006  
|                       
|/S/    ANTHONY
ZINGALE 
|Anthony Zingale        
|Chief Executive Officer
#### NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. The RUSSELL MANUFACTURING CO., Inc., et al., Respondent.

No. 13104.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

On Petition for a Rehearing.

For former opinion, see 187 F.2d 296.

Before HOLMES, BORAH, and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In view of the Supreme Court’s recent pronouncement of the scope of our appellate review in Universal Camera Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, 71 S.Ct. 456, decided February 26, 1951, the petition for rehearing is hereby .granted only with reference to that part of the Board’s order which was held to be enforceable. Such rehearing as is granted will be upon briefs only, as we do not deem further oral argument necessary. The petitioner is granted 30 days in which to file its additional brief, and the respondents will be allowed, to file their brief, 15 days from the date that they receive petitioner’s brief.
No. 11-196.

#### Godfrey *v.*Department of Transportation.

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 95.2719 MURS replacement parts. The operator of an MURS transmitter may replace parts of an MURS transmitter as indicated in this section. All other internal maintenance and repairs must be carried out in accordance with § 95.319. ( a ) A damaged antenna may be replaced by another antenna of the same or a compatible similar type.
( b ) Batteries in the MURS transmitter may be replaced with batteries of a type specified by the manufacturer.