alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Subpart I of Part 17

#### Editorial Note:

Paragraphs (a)-(h) of § 17.99 appear in 50 Part 17, §§ 17.99(a) to 17.99(h).

###### Editorial Note on Subpart I of Part 17

#### Editorial Note:

Paragraphs (a)-(e) of § 17.95 appear in 50 Part 17, §§ 17.1 to 17.95(a), 50 Part 17, § 17.95(b), and 50 Part 17, § 17.95(c) to § 17.95(e).

###### Editorial Note on Subpart I of Part 17

#### Editorial Note:

Paragraphs (a)-(b) of § 17.95 appear in 50 Part 17, §§ 17.1 to 17.95(a) and 50 Part 17, § 17.95(b).

###### Editorial Note on Subpart I of Part 17

#### Editorial Note:

Paragraph (a) of § 17.95 appears in 50 Part 17, §§ 17.1 to 17.95(a).

#### §§ 17.97-17.98 [Reserved]
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to the requirements set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350), the undersigned, in his capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of Del Monte Foods Company, hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. |  | The annual report of Del Monte Foods Company on Form 10-K for the period ended May 1, 2005, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Periodic
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Del Monte Foods Company at the end
of and for the period covered by the Periodic Report.
| | -- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:    July 8, 2005



/S/    DAVID L.
MEYERSDavid L. Meyers Executive Vice President, Administration and Chief Financial Officer




This certification
accompanies and is being furnished with this Periodic Report, shall not be deemed filed by Del Monte Foods Company (the Company) for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or
otherwise subject to liability under that Section and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made
before or after the date of this Periodic Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Del Monte Foods Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>


Exhibit 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report MIV Therapeutics, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending August 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Alan P. Lindsay, as
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.




/S/ ALAN P. LINDSAY
-------------------
Alan P. Lindsay
President and CEO
October 1, 2004
EXHIBIT 16


                 [Karlins, Fuller, Arnold & Klodosky P.C. Letterhead]





          March 16, 1998


          American Eco Corporation
          11011 Jones Road
          Houston, Texas 77070

          Gentlemen:

          We have read the statements made by American Eco Corporation (the
          "Company") in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
          November 30, 1997, concerning the resignation of this firm as
          independent accountants of the Company effective May 7, 1997, and
          we concur with such statements.

          Sincerely,


          Karlins, Fuller, Arnold & Klodosky, P.C.


          /s/ Michael Karlins
          _____________________
          Michael Karlins, CPA
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1157/2005

of 18 July 2005         

fixing Community producer and import prices for carnations and roses with a view to the application of the arrangements governing imports of certain floricultural products originating in Jordan

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4088/87 of 21 December 1987 fixing conditions for the application of preferential customs duties on imports of certain flowers originating in Cyprus, Israel, Jordan, Morocco and the West Bank and the Gaza Strip (1), and in particular Article 5(2)(a) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The Community producer and import prices for uniflorous (bloom) carnations, multiflorous (spray) carnations, large-flowered roses and small-flowered roses as referred to in Article 1 of Regulation (EEC) No 4088/87 shall be as set out in the Annex hereto for the period from 20 July to 2 August 2005.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 July 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 382, 31.12.1987, p. 22. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1300/97 (OJ L 177, 5.7.1997, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 72, 18.3.1988, p. 16. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2062/97 (OJ L 289, 22.10.1997, p. 1).

(3)OJ L 346, 31.12.2003, p. 65.

(4)OJ L 345, 31.12.2003, p. 117.

(5)OJ L 2, 5.1.2005, p. 4.

----

ANNEX

----
**Exhibit 32.1     Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of Milwaukee Iron Arena Football, Inc. pursuant to Section 906 of the****Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Milwaukee Iron Arena Football, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Richard S. Astrom, Chief Executive Officer of Milwaukee Iron Arena Football, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,        as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: July 29, 2013
#### § 61.171 Adoption notice.

When a carrier's name is changed, or its operating control transferred from one carrier to another in whole or in part, the successor carrier must file tariff revisions to reflect the name change. The successor carrier may either immediately reissue the entire tariff in its own name, or immediately file an adoption notice. Within 35 days of filing an adoption notice, the successor must reissue the entire tariff in its own name. The reissued tariff must be numbered in the series of the successor carrier, and must contain all original pages without changes in regulations or rates. The transmittal letter must state the tariff is being filed to show a change in the carrier's name pursuant to § 61.171 of the Commission's Rules. The adoption notice, if used, must read as follows:

The (Exact name of successor carrier or receiver) here adopts, ratifies and makes its own in every respect, all applicable tariffs and amendments filed with the Federal Communications Commission by (predecessor) prior to (date).
§ 80.76 Requirements for land station control points. Each coast or fixed station subject to this part must have the following facilities: ( a ) Except for marine utility stations, a visual indication of antenna current; or a pilot lamp, meter or equivalent device which provides continuous visual indication whenever the transmitter control circuits have been actuated.
( b ) Capability to aurally monitor all transmissions originating at dispatch points and to disconnect the dispatch points from the transmitter or to terminate the operation of the transmitter.
( c ) Facilities which will permit the responsible operator to turn the carrier of the radio transmitter on and off at will.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**659**

**CA 13**

**- 02157** 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, SCONIERS, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

JESSICA SANCHEZ, PLAINTIFF

- APPELLANT,
ET AL., PLAINTIFF,

V ORDER

MARY E. DAWSON AND BIRNIE BUS SERVICE, INC.,

DEFENDANTS

- RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

BRINDISI, MU RAD, BRINDISI & PEARLMAN, LLP, UTICA (STEPHANIE A. PALMER OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF

- APPELLANT.

BREEDLOVE & NOLL, LLP, CLIFTON PARK (CARRIE MCLOUGHLIN NOLL OF COUNSEL),

FOR DEFENDANTS

- RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Bernadette T. Clark, J.), entered July 18, 2013. The order and judgment denied the motion of plaintiff Jessica Sanchez to set aside a jury verdict.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without
costs ( see Smith v Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn & Queens , 155 AD2d 435;

see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

Entered: August 8, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jones Soda Co. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Peter van Stolk, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                      |  |  |  |                
|------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------
|                                      |  | 
|/s/ Peter van Stolk                   |  |  |  | August 12, 2005
|Peter van Stolk,                      |  |  |  |                
|Chief Executive Officer and President |  |  |  |
```

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 178 (Thursday, September 14, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54263-54264]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7650]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service

California Coast Provincial Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The California Coast Provincial Advisory Committee (CCPAC) 
will meet on October 4-5, 2006, in Upper Lake California. The purpose 
of the meeting is to discuss issues relating to implementing the 
Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP).

DATES: The meeting will be held from 10 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on October 4, 
2006 and 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. on October 5, 2006.

ADDRESSES: October 4, 2006, is a day-long field trip to the Upper Lake 
Ranger District, 10025 Elk Mountain Road, Upper Lake, California. On 
October 5, 2006, the meeting will be held at the Tallman Hotel 
Conference Room, 9550 Main Street, Upper Lake, California.

[[Page 54264]]

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Allen, Committee Coordinator, 
USDA, Six Rivers National Forest, 1330 Bayshore Way, Eureka, CA 95501, 
(707) 441-3557, [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The field trip is to the Pillsbury 
Stewardship Project and the Westshore Fuels Reduction Project. Agenda 
topics to be covered on October 5, 2006, include: (1) Marbled Murrelet 
Presentation; (2) Northwest Forest Plan 10-year Monitoring Reports; (3) 
Survey and Mange Final Supplemental EIS; and (4) New Mexico Forest 
Restoration Principles.
    The meeting is open to the public. Public input opportunity will be 
provided and individuals will have the opportunity to address the 
Committee at that time.

    Dated: September 8, 2006.
Tyrone Kelley,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 06-7650 Filed 9-13-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
```
#### Robert Adams and A. W. Calder, *Appellants,*vs. First National Bank of St. Petersburg, *Trustee;*J. S. McMullen, H. D. Ulmer and C. V. Smith, *Appellees.*

143 So. 345.

Division A.

Opinion filed August 2, 1932.

*Spear, Viney, Sheltón & Pearce,*for Appellants;

*Bashm Jordan,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

The decree in this case should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment in the ease of The Polk County National Bank vs. Barrah, et al., and authorities there cited, 52 Fla. 581, 42 Sou. 323; and in Clermont-Minneola Country Club vs. Loblaw, et al., filed at this term of this Court, and it is so ordered.

*311Affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.
§ 17.51 Treatment as endangered or threatened. ( a ) Any species listed in § 17.11 or § 17.12, pursuant to § 17.50, shall be treated as Endangered or Threatened, as indicated in the “Status” column.
( b ) All of the provisions of subparts C (Endangered Wildlife), D (Threatened Wildlife), F (Endangered Plants) or G (Threatened Plants), as appropriate, shall apply to any such species.
P.1 

RCRA Box 321 

Prepped by Ryan Dugan 

Document Number: 

214)OGRC-S0015 

Docket Number: 

F-93-OGRC-FFFFF 

Printed 5/8/2007 3:36:31 PM Sheet 214 of 259 
P.2 

O&RC- SOOtf 

A . A . OILFIELD SERVICE, INC. 

August A. Peters, Jr., President 

Post Office Box 5208 Cyril A. Scheller, Vice-President 

HOBBS, NEW MEXICO 88241-5208 Barry A. Peters, Vice-President 

October 30, 1990 

Mr. Bob Tonetti 

Mail Code OS 320W 

401 M Street S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20460 

Dear Bob, 

I want to thank you for coming to Southeastern New Mexico to visit the 

Parabo and A.A. Oilfield Service crude oil reclamation facilities. 

As you can tell crude oil reclaimers provide a very valuable function 

in the oil industry as well as to the environment. 

I have given a great deal of thought about the possible solutions to 

this dilemma. Please let me share them with you. 

1. EXEMPT THE CRUDE OIL RECLAIMERS ALTOGETHER. 

Crude oil reclaimers were wrongfully included in the 

non-exempt status. This can be done by clearly defining 

crude oil reclaimers. E& P wastes handled by crude oil 

reclaimers are no different than producer's stock oil 

tank wastes which are exempted wastes. 

2.. Exempt crude oil reclaimers under the TCLP rule BOT 

ADOPT THE IOCC PROPOSALS FOR SITE PERMITTING, EMERGENCY 

RESPONSE, COMPLIANCE INSPECTIONS, FINANCIAL ASSURANCE, 

WASTE TRACKING AND MANIFESTING, CLOSURE, AND STATE 

AGENCY FUNDING. This approach offers flexibility in 

dealing with the problem nationwide and does not throw 

reclaimer's wastes and facilities in the same classiification as everyone else that would generate a TCLP 

"Hazardous Waste." 

3. LEAVE THE CRUDE OIL RECLAIMERS WHERE THEY ARE UNDER 

CURRENT REGULATION AS OF SEPTEMBER 25, 1990. This 

is unacceptable and is directly contrary to the E.P.A. 

policy of waste minimization, waste segregation in the 

oilfield, and minimizing disposal of waste crude oil 

on site or in exempt landfills. 
P.3 

1 

I know you are very aware of the seriousness of this problem. I 

appreciate you and your staff for recognizing the problem and dealing 

with it accordingly. I have the upmost faith that a workable and 

practical solution will be found to accomplish the goals of both the 

crude oil reclaimers and the E.P.A. policy of environmental responsibility. 

Please feel free to call if any questions might arise, 

to hearing from you. 

I look forward 

Barny A. Peters 

Vice-President 

cc: Dennis Ruddy
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            College of Information and Cyberspace
                    National Defense University
                CIC
        Search
                    Search CIC:
                        Search
                Search CIC:
                    Search
    Home

    About 
        Mission & Vision

    Faculty & Staff

    Fact Sheet

    Alumni

    Internships

    FAQ

    Admissions 
        Eligibility Requirements

    Admissions Calendar

    Application Instructions

    Apply Online

    International Students

    Academics 
        Graduate Catalog

    M.S. in Strategic Information and Cyberspace Studies
        
        JPME Master's Degree

    Cyber Workforce Master's Degree (Part Time)

    Leadership Development Programs

    Graduate Certificates

    Academic Partners

    Current Students 
        JPME II  Incoming Students

    LDP Incoming Students

    Student Registration

    Bring Your Own Device

    IA Compliance

    Completion Procedures / Order Transcripts

    Student Services and Resources

    Events
    
        Cyber Beacon

    Cyber PME Colloquium

    Hopper Award

    Lecture Series

    CYBERCOM Symposium

    NEWS

    UC2
    
        About

    Events

    Work With Us

    Center for Cybersecurity
    
        About

    Cybersecurity Center POC

    Cybersecurity Supporting Faculty

    CAE-CDE CISO Certificate Program

    Cybersecurity Trending News

    Cyber Labs
        
        Ethical Hacking

    Critical Infrastructure - SCADA

    Cyber Exercises
        
        Tabletop Exercise

    Cyber Competitions

    Cyber Resources and Awareness

    Stakeholder / Industry Advisory Council

    Contact 
        Contact Us

    Directions

    Access to Ft. McNair

    Map of Ft. McNair  Home
  NEWS
  News & Announcements
 News & Announcements News
 Dr. Gerry Gingrich Publishes Article on Government Centralization in Federal Times By Patricia Coopersmith
 To Centralize or Decentralize? 
The debate on whether to centralize or decentralize our federal IT systems is as hot as ever – even after 50 years or more. Frankly, I don’t think the debate will ever end, as there is no simple organizational system for IT except in the case of small organizations. And in the federal sector, we don’t do small. So what is the answer? 
Click HERE for entire article.
 SHARE
 PRINT
 National Defense University


College of Information and Cyberspace

300 Fifth Ave., Bldg. 62
Fort Lesley J. McNair
Washington, DC 20319-5066

202-685-6300
                    Stay Connected
                
                
                DOD Privacy & Security
 DOD Links Disclaimer
 DOD Social Media Policy
 DOD Web Policy
 FOIA
 NDU System of Records Notice
 NDU Privacy & Security Notice
 No FEAR Act
 Open GOV
 Plain Writing Act
 Section 508
 Small Business Act
 USA.gov
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
No. 11-10063.

#### Jean-Pierre *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Parallax  Entertainment,  Inc. (the
"Company"),  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I Yarek
Bartosz,  Chief Executive  Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



By: /s/ Yarek Bartosz
------------------------
Yarek Bartosz
President, CEO,and CFO

August 19, 2002
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P259Analyzing and Responding to Repeat Offending POP GuideThis Problem-Solving Tools Guide, Analyzing and Responding to Repeat Offending, summarizes what is known from research and practice about repeat offending, explains how police and analysts can understand their local repeat offender problems, and summarizes how police can respond effectively to repeat offender problems.By Nick TilleyCategories: Data and Analysis • POP Center ResourceLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p259Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFBook • Apr 2013Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 05:35 (UTC-5) in 0.19 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive