alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<page>
			            EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Dean Witter Portfolio
Strategy Fund L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey
A. Rothman, President, Demeter Management Corporation, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.




By:	  /s/	Jeffrey A. Rothman

Name:		Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:	President

Date:		March 15, 2004
#### § 14.101 Purposes.

The purpose of this subpart is to prescribe requirements necessary to ensure that live wild mammals and birds shipped to the United States arrive alive, healthy, and uninjured, and that transportation of such animals occurs under humane and healthful conditions. These regulations implement section 9(d) of the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981.
827 P.2d 1174

#### Nancy Carol ROBERTS, individually and as the personal representative of the estate of James Arnold Roberts, deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kelly J. Reed, Steven D. Clark; Lloyd E. Hedberg and Blanche M. Hedberg, husband and wife, Defendants, and TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT, By and Through the Idaho Transportation Board, Defendant-Respondent.

No. 19705.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, Feb. 1992 Term.

March 20, 1992.

Imhoff & Lynch, Boise, for plaintiff-appellant. Patrick D. Furey argued, Boise.

Hon. Larry EchoHawk, Atty. Gen., and Hall, Farley, Oberrecht & Blanton, Boise, for defendant-respondent. Donald J. Farley argued, Boise.

PER CURIAM.

Nancy Carol Roberts appealed the trial court’s summary judgment dismissing her claims for personal injuries and for the wrongful death of her husband. We assigned the case to the Court of Appeals, which reversed and remanded. *Roberts v. Transportation Department,*121 Idaho 727, 827 P.2d 1178 (Ct.App.1991). The De-' partment of Transportation requested review of the decision of the Court of Appeals, which we granted.

We have reviewed and considered the briefs, the record, the transcript, and the opinion of the Court of Appeals. We have also listened to and considered the oral arguments presented to us. Based on this review and consideration, we concur with the decision of the Court of Appeals.

We award costs, but not attorney fees, to appellant on review.
§ 78.53 Unattended operation. ( a ) A CARS station may be operated unattended: *Provided,* That such operation is conducted in accordance with the conditions listed below: *And provided further,* That the Commission, in Washington, DC, is notified at least 10 days prior to the beginning of unattended operation if such operation is not indicated on the station authorization. ( 1 ) The transmitter and associated control circuits shall be installed and protected in a manner designed to prevent tampering or operation by unauthorized persons.
( 2 ) If the transmitting apparatus is located at a site which is not readily accessible at all hours and in all seasons, means shall be provided for turning the transmitter on and off at will from a location which can be reached promptly at all hours and in all seasons.
( 3 ) Personnel responsible for the maintenance of the station shall be available on call at a location which will assure expeditious performance of such technical servicing and maintenance as may be necessary whenever the station is operating. In lieu thereof, arrangements may be made to have a person or persons available at all times when the transmitter is operating, to turn the transmitter off in the event that it is operating improperly. The transmitter may not be restored to operation until the malfunction has been corrected by a technically qualified person.
( 4 ) The station licensee shall be responsible for the proper operation of the station at all times and is expected to provide for observations, servicing and maintenance as often as may be necessary to ensure proper operation. All adjustments or tests during or coincident with the installation, servicing, or maintenance of the station which may affect its operation shall be performed by or under the immediate supervision of a technically qualified person.
( b ) The Commission may notify the licensee not to commence unattended operation, or to cancel, suspend, or change the date of the beginning of such operation as and when such action may appear to be in the public interest, convenience, or necessity.
(Secs. 1, 2, 301, 307, 48 Stat., as amended 1064, 1081, 1083; (47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 301, 307))
[37 FR 3292, Feb. 12, 1972, as amended at 41 FR 29695, July 19, 1976; 42 FR 61864, Dec. 7, 1977; 43 FR 4617, Feb. 3, 1978; 43 FR 25127, June 9, 1978; 49 FR 20671, May 16, 1984; 50 FR 23422, June 4, 1985; 50 FR 32418, Aug. 12, 1985]
No. 11-9579.

#### Flemming *v.*City of New York Police Department for Bronx, New York, et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4182 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
#### § 90.661 MTA-based SMR service areas.

MTA licenses for SMR spectrum blocks in the 896-901/935-940 MHz band listed in table 4B of § 90.617(d) are available in 51 Major Trading Areas (MTAs) as defined in § 90.7. Within these MTAs, licenses will be authorized in ten channel blocks as specified in table 4B of § 90.617(d) through the competitive bidding procedures described in subpart U of this part.

[60 FR 21991, May 4, 1995]
Appendix C

PubMed Core Strategy

	PubMed Core Strategy

(((((("cataract"[mh] OR cataract[tw]) AND ("glaucoma"[mh] OR glaucoma[tw])) AND ((((((((("surgery"[mh] OR surgery[tw]) OR "filtering surgery"[mh]) OR filtering surgery[tw]) OR "cataract extraction"[mh]) OR cataract extraction[tw]) OR sclerostomy[tw]) OR trabeculectomy[tw]) OR phacoemulsification[tw]) NOT (("child"[mh] OR "anesthesia"[mh]) OR "anesthetics"[mh])))

•	limited to English [la]

•	added to all phases of PubMed optimal search strategy for retrieval of controlled trials, with addition of search strategy for case series 

Optimal search strategy for the retrieval of controlled trials using PubMed:  Phases 1, 2 and 3a.

(randomized controlled trial [pt] OR controlled clinical trial [pt] OR randomized controlled trials [mh] OR random allocation [mh] OR double-blind method [mh] OR single-blind method [mh] OR clinical trial [pt] OR clinical trials [mh] OR (clinic* [tw] AND trial* [tw]) OR ((singl* [tw] OR doubl* [tw] OR trebl* [tw] OR tripl* [tw]) AND (mask* [tw] OR blind* [tw])) OR (latin [tw] AND square [tw]) OR placebos [mh] OR placebo* [tw] OR random* [tw] OR research design [mh:noexp] OR comparative study [mh] OR evaluation studies [mh] OR follow-up studies [mh] OR prospective studies [mh] OR cross-over studies [mh] OR control* [tw] OR prospectiv* [tw] OR volunteer* [tw] OR case report[mh] OR (case[tw] AND series[tw])) NOT (animal [mh] NOT human [mh])

note: items underlined added to strategy for the glaucoma EPC literature search

a.Robinson KA, Hinegardner PG, Lansing P.  Development of an optimal search strategy for the retrieval of controlled trials using PubMed [abstract].  Proceedings of the 6th International Cochrane Colloquium; 1998 Oct 22-26; Abstr Workshops Sci Sess Int Cochrane Coll. 1998;6:85.
#### § 216.46 U.S. citizens on foreign flag vessels operating under the International Dolphin Conservation Program.

The MMPA's provisions do not apply to a citizen of the United States who incidentally takes any marine mammal during fishing operations in the ETP which are outside the U.S. exclusive economic zone (as defined in section 3 of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1802)), while employed on a fishing vessel of a harvesting nation that is participating in, and in compliance with, the IDCP.

_____

__________

[65 FR 56, Jan. 3, 2000]
#### § 51.221 Reciprocal compensation.

The rules governing reciprocal compensation are set forth in subpart H of this part.
§ 22.10 Relationship to other permit requirements. You may not take, possess, or transport any bald eagle (*Haliaeetus leucocephalus*) or any golden eagle (*Aquila chrysaetos*), or the parts, nests, or eggs of such birds, except as allowed by a valid permit issued under this part, 50 CFR part 13, 50 CFR part 17, and/or 50 CFR part 21 as provided by § 21.4, or authorized under a depredation order issued under subpart D of this part. We will accept a single application for a permit under this part and any other parts of this subchapter B if it includes all of the information required for an application under each applicable part. ( a ) A permit that covers take of bald eagles or golden eagles under 50 CFR part 17 for purposes of providing prospective or current ESA authorization constitutes a valid permit issued under this part for any take authorized under the permit issued under part 17 as long as the permittee is in full compliance with the terms and conditions of the permit issued under part 17. The provisions of part 17 that originally applied will apply for purposes of the Eagle Act authorization, except that the criterion for revocation of the permit is that the activity is incompatible with the preservation of the bald eagle or the golden eagle rather than inconsistent with the criterion set forth in 16 U.S.C. 1539(a)(2)(B)(iv).
( b ) You do not need a permit under parts 17 and 21 of this subchapter B for any activity permitted under this part 22 with respect to bald or golden eagles or their parts, nests, or eggs.
( c ) A permit under this part only authorizes take, possession, and/or transport under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act and does not provide authorization under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act or the Endangered Species Act for the take, possession, and/or transport of migratory birds or endangered or threatened species other than bald or golden eagles.
( d ) If you are transporting dead bald or golden eagles, or their parts, nests, or dead eggs into or out of the United States, you will also need a Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) permit under part 23 of this subchapter.
[64 FR 50472, Sept. 17, 1999, as amended at 68 FR 61140, Oct. 27, 2003; 73 FR 29083, May 20, 2008; 81 FR 91550, Dec. 16, 2016; Redesignated and amended at 87 FR 884, Jan. 7, 2022]
Exhibit 23  TURNER, JONES AND ASSOCIATES, P.L.L.C. Certified Public Accountants 108 Center Street, North, 2nd Floor Vienna, Virginia 22180-5769 (703) 242-6500 FAX (703) 242-1600  Wastech, Inc. 3 Broad Street, Suite 3A Charleston, SC 29401  As independent auditors of Wastech, Inc., we hereby consent to the incorporation of our report dated November 7, 2006, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Wastech, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 in the Form 10-KSB of Wastech, Inc. for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003. /s/ Turner, Jones and Associates, P.L.L.C. Vienna, Virginia November 29, 2006  {A0035916.DOC}
# Florida Department 

# of Environmental Protection
Bob Martinez Center 2600 BIair Stone Road T~&ssx, FIori& 32399-2400 

### -.

Mr. A. Stanley Meiburg

Acting Regional Administrator United States Environmental

Prstection Agency 

## - Region 4 61 Fotsyth Street, SW Atlanta, Georgia30503-8901) 

### Re: Air 

### Program: Implementatkin ofthe EPA Tailoring Rule


### Dear Mr. Meiburg: 

### In its June 

### 3 publication ofthe greenhouse gas (GHG) tailoringrule, EPA requested information fkm the states regardingtheir plans for implementing 

### the rule. This Ietter is in responseto 

### that request. 

### Florida 

### is unable 

### to automaticatly implement the prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) pvisions ofthe tailoring rule by interpretationofthe term "subjectto regulation." Asyou may know, 

### Ficwida's

### PSD pennmingprogram 

### is limited to those pollutants 

### identified in our state 

### rules as 

### "PSD pollutants," a term that does not include GHGs. 

### In order to incorporateGHGs into our 

### PSD permitting 

### program, we 

### will need to amend our srate 

### rules

### and submit a 

### SIP revision

### to 

### EPA. Likewise, Florida's Tile

### V permitting program is limited to 

### "regulatedpollutants" as 

### narrowly defined in our rutes. Again,
we cannot extend 

### the program to 

### sourcesthat would be Title V solely on the 

### basis of

### their 

### GHG emissionswithout amending our state

### rules accordingly. Currently, it is not 

### possibre to estimate how much time will be needed for 

### usto amend our rules to implementthe 

### PSD and 

### Tide V provisions of the tailoring rule, particularly since we anticipate 

### a high level of inteest in this rulemakingby 

### el4 officials, including a new governorand staff. It is our understanding 

### that EPA will propose a SIP call in August for states that are unable to automatidly implement the tailoring rule by interpretationofthe tenn "subject to regulation." This is to conh that Florida should be on the list of

### expected SfP-caIl states 

### in that pmpusal. 

### We will respond directly to the ShPcaII proposal once we have 

### had a chance to review it; in the meantime, however, we believe EPA should anticipate having to use, for 

### an indefinite

### period oftime, its 

### Federal Implementation Plan authority for implementingthe PSD program in Florida and its Tie V authorityto regulate sources that 

### are major for 

### GHGs only.

~iv&ion of Air Resource Management JKflgt
cc: Richard Schu~ Chief, Air Planning Branch, EPA Region 4
J-A23012-22 & J-A23013-22

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT O.P. 65.37

IN THE INTEREST OF: E.J.A.,

A MINOR

APPEAL OF: LEGAL COUNSEL FOR 

MINOR CHILD

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

 PENNSYLVANIA

 No. 740 MDA 2022

Appeal from the Decree Entered April 20, 2022

In the Court of Common Pleas of York County Orphans' Court at No(s): 

2022-0009a

IN THE INTEREST OF: R.M.A.,

A MINOR

APPEAL OF: LEGAL COUNSEL OF THE 

MINOR CHILD

:

:

:

:

:

:

 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

 PENNSYLVANIA

 No. 741 MDA 2022

Appeal from the Decree Entered April 20, 2022

In the Court of Common Pleas of York County Orphans' Court at No(s): 

2022-0010a

BEFORE: BOWES, J., McCAFFERY, J., and STEVENS, P.J.E.*

DISSENTING STATEMENT BY McCAFFERY, J.:

FILED DECEMBER 14, 2023

I incorporate my dissenting memoranda, filed at Mother’s and Father’s 

appeals from the underlying termination orders. As I would reverse those 

orders, on the ground the orphans’ court failed to properly address all the 

____________________________________________

* Former Justice specially assigned to the Superior Court.
J-A23012-22 & J-A23013-22

- 2 -

relevant evidence presented, I would dismiss the instant two appeals as moot. 

Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.
§ 80.553 Supplemental eligibility requirements. An applicant for an operational fixed station must certify that: ( a ) The applicant is the licensee of a coast station;
( b ) Other suitable telecommunications facilities are not available to satisfy coast station requirements.
[51 FR 31213, Sept. 2, 1986, as amended at 63 FR 68956, Dec. 14, 1998]
#### § 96.27 [Reserved]
#### § 839.602 What if I don't make an election?

(a) If your qualifying retirement coverage error was not previously corrected and you fail to make an election within the time limit under [§ 839.611(a)](/on/2024-09-20/title-5/section-839.611#p-839.611(a)), your retirement coverage is summarized in the following chart:

| If you are in: | And you belong in: | You are considered to have elected: |
| --- | --- | --- |
| CSRS or CSRS Offset | FERS | CSRS Offset. |
| FERS | CSRS, CSRS Offset or Social Security-Only | FERS. |
| CSRS or CSRS Offset | Social Security-Only | CSRS Offset. |

(b) If your qualifying retirement coverage error was previously corrected and you fail to make an election within the time limit under [§ 839.611(b)](/on/2024-09-20/title-5/section-839.611#p-839.611(b)), you are considered to have elected to remain in your current retirement plan.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Darin P. McAreavey, Executive Vice president, ChiefFinancial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of Stellent, Inc., a MinnesotaCorporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

(1)   the AnnualReport on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal period ended March 31,2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(3)   the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
|                            | /s/ DARIN P. McAREAVEY                                                        |
|----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       | Darin P. McAreavey                                                            |
| * *                   | *Executive  Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer* |
| Dated:  June 14, 2006 |                                                                          |

 

----
No. 10-10867.

#### Yates *v.*Baldwin et al.

C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Siclone Industries, Inc., on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Paul Adams, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a)
or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date: November 14,  2006         /s/ Paul Adams
                                 -----------------------------------
                                 Paul Adams
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 And Principal Accounting Officer
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors 

Del Monte Foods Company: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference inthe registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-40867, 333-52226, 333-38394, 333-34280, 333-79315, 333-102702, 333-102700, 333-102006, and 333-134898) of Del Monte Foods Company (the Company) of our reports dated July 7, 2006, with respect to theconsolidated balance sheets of Del Monte Foods Company and subsidiaries as of April 30, 2006 and May 1, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the yearsin the three-year period ended April 30, 2006, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of April 30, 2006, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of April 30,2006, which reports appear in the annual report on Form 10-K of Del Monte Foods Company for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2006. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

San Francisco, California 

July 7, 2006
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Defense Contract Audit Agency

# AGENCY:

Defense Contract Audit Agency, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice of Membership of the Defense Contract Audit Agency Senior Executive Service Performance Review Boards. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the appointment of members to the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) Performance Review Boards. The Performance Review Boards provide fair and impartial review of Senior Executive Service (SES) performance appraisals and make recommendations to the Director, Defense Contract Audit Agency, regarding final performance ratings and performance awards for DCAA SES members. 

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         September 12, 2006.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Rita Blakeslee, Chief, Human Resources Management Division, Defense Contract Audit Agency, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Suite 2135, Fort Belvoir, Virginia 22060-6219, (703) 767-1236.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), the following are the names and titles of DCAA career executives appointed to serve as members of the DCAA Performance Review Boards. Appointees will serve one-year terms effective upon publication of this notice.

## Headquarters Performance Review Board

Mr. Joseph Garcia, Assistant Director, Operations, DCAA, chairperson.

Mr. Ken Saceoccia, Assistant Director, Policy and Plans, DCAA, member.

Mr. John Farenish, General Counsel, DCAA, Member.

## Regional Performance Review Board

Mr. Michael Steen, Regional Director, MidAtlantic Region, DCAA, chairperson.

Mr. Ed Nelson, Regional Director, Northeastern Region, DCAA, member.

Mr. Paul Phillips, Regional Director, Eastern Region, member.

Dated: September 5, 2006.

C.R. Choate, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 06-7589 Filed 9-11-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-4600

_____________________________

NICOLE MARIE ALLEN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.

Michael A. Flowers, Judge.

August 29, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, ROWE, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Nicole Marie Allen, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Virginia Harris, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.