alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Supreme Court ofthe United States Office ofthe Clerk 

## Washington, DC 20543-0001 June 22, 2015 Clerk Court ofCriminal Appeals ofTexas P.O. Box 12308 Capitol Station Austin, TX 78711 Re: Eric DeWayne Cathey v. Texas No. 14-8305 (Your No. WR-55,161-02) Scott S. Harris Clerk of the Court (202)479-3011

Dear Clerk: 

### The Court today entered the following order in the above-entitled case: The petition for a writ ofcertiorari is denied. Sincerely, 

# 4-3fr Scott S. Harris, Clerk

RECEIVED IN 

### COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

### JUN 25 2015 

## Abe!Acosta, Clerk
No. 11-5789.

#### Atkins *v.*Spencer, Commissioner, Massachusetts Department of Correction.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
**GAO-10-521R**                      Published: Apr 30, 2010. Publicly Released: Apr 30, 2010.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

This report is in response to section 1899L of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. The statute required the Comptroller General to examine issues related to participation in and administrative costs associated with the Health Coverage Tax Credit program administered by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in the Department of the Treasury, and to provide the results to Congress by March 1, 2010.

## Full Report

Full Report (44 pages)

Accessible Text 

## GAO Contacts

John Dicken
dickenj@gao.gov

(202) 512-7114

## Office of Public Affairs

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

Health Care

Administrative costsComparative analysisCost analysisCost sharing (finance)Eligibility criteriaEligibility determinationsHealth insuranceHealth services administrationProgram evaluationTax administration systemsTax credit
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P126Vital Partners: Mayors and Police Chiefs Working Together for America's Children and YouthThe National League of Cites (NLC) and COPS have released a new report highlighting effective collaborations between mayors and law enforcement officials to protect the safety of children and youth. The report is the product of an intensive research, data collection, and outreach effort by NLC's Institute for Youth, Education, and Families, the COPS Office, and the International Association of Chiefs of Police. The report describes effective partnerships in cities of every size and region that demonstrate the importance of community oriented policing strategies, the role of data in sustaining momentum and measuring results, and the challenges of building partnerships around a shared community vision. Topics addressed in the report include prevention of gang violence, bullying, and substance abuse; creating safe places for recreation; effective neighborhood policing programs; and partnerships with diverse stakeholders.Categories: Youth SafetyLanguage: EnglishLow stockPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p126Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFPamphlet • Feb 2007Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 04:59 (UTC-5) in 0.89 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 468 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 468

 To provide for the rehiring by the Federal Aviation Administration of 
                certain former air traffic controllers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 1993

 Mr. Oberstar introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the rehiring by the Federal Aviation Administration of 
                certain former air traffic controllers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fair Treatment of Former Air Traffic 
Controllers Act of 1993''.

SEC. 2. SUITABILITY OF AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS WHO PARTICIPATED IN THE 
              1981 STRIKE.

    (a) Authority To Appoint or Reinstate Certain Former Air Traffic 
Controllers.--Air traffic controllers whose appointment was terminated 
on account of the strike of air traffic controllers which began on or 
about August 3, 1981, shall not, as a class, be considered unsuitable 
for appointment or reinstatement in the Federal Aviation 
Administration. Determinations of suitability for appointment or 
reinstatement to any such position shall be made on a case-by-case 
basis by the Office of Personnel Management in accordance with part 731 
of title 5 of the Code of Federal Regulations (as in effect on June 1, 
1986).
    (b) Limitation on Claims Against U.S.--
            (1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), no 
        claim may lie against the Government of the United States, or 
        any officer, employee, or agency thereof, based on a failure to 
        appoint or reinstate a particular individual as a result of 
        enactment of this Act.
            (2) Claims based on discrimination.--Nothing in this 
        subsection shall preclude a claim based on discrimination on 
        the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
    (c) Nonapplicability of Age Limitation.--Nothing in section 3307(b) 
of title 5, United States Code, or in any rule or regulation prescribed 
thereunder, shall apply with respect to appointments made as a result 
of enactment of this Act.
    (d) Regulations.--The Secretary of Transportation may prescribe 
regulations to carry out this section (excluding the second sentence of 
subsection (a)).
    (e) Definition.--For the purposes of this section, the term ``air 
traffic controller'' has the meaning given such term by section 2109 of 
title 5, United States Code.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Peh Chung Lim, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of China Evergreen Environmental Corporation (registrant):

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.



|                       
|-----------------------
|Date: August 21, 2006  
|                       
|/s/ Peh Chung Lim      
|Peh Chung Lim          
|Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 31.1: Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications





I, Wenge Fang, certify that:





1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of China Water Group, Inc. (the “Registrant”);




2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.  The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and have:




a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this  report is being prepared;




b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.  The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the smaller reporting Registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.




Date: December 14, 2011
/s/ Wenge FangWenge Fang, Chief Executive Officer
#### The State v. Billings, *Appellant.*

1. Arraignment. This case is reversed because the record fails to show that the prisoner was arraigned.

3. Affray: evidence. It is no objection to the admissibility of evidence offered in support of an indictment for an affray, that it shows that the trouble commenced in a private house, where it further shows that the combatants passed out of the house and continued the fight without cessation in a public street.

*663
      *Appeal from Bollinger Circuit Court.*— Hon. John B. Robinson, Judge.

Reversed.

*Cahoon & Whybark*for appellant.

*J. L.*Smith, Attorney-General, for the State.

Norton, J.

This is an indictment founded on section 6, Wagner’s Statutes, 491, upon which defendant was tried and convicted in the circuit court of Bollinger county. Erom this judgment of conviction he has appealed to this court. As the record fails to show an arraignment of the defendant before he was put upon his trial, the judgment must be reversed, and as the cause will be remanded for further proceedings, we deem it proper to say that the indictment charges in the language of the statute that defendant and one Whitehead voluntarily and by agreement engaged in a tight in “ a certain public street and highway in the town of Marble Hill.” * * The evidence tended to show that the tight was entered into in a saloon, on a public street in said town, the front door of which was open, and was continued through the door and out on the street. On the trial defendant objected to the introduction of the evidence as to the commencement of the affray in the saloon. ***The objection, we think, was properly overruled. The commencement of the fight in the saloon and its continuance by the parties engaged in it after they got out on the street, were so intimately blended as to constitute but one transaction. The mere fact of the fight having been entered into in the saloon, will not exempt defendant from liability if it was continued by the combtants af ter they reached the public street. The first instruction, if modified as above indicated, ought to be given. Judgment reversed and cause remanded, in which

all concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4772 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 198

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4772

                          [Report No. 103-639]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
    at 215 South Evans Street in Greenville, North Carolina, as the 
   ``Walter B. Jones Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             August 1, 1994

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                                 House Calendar No. 198
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4772

                          [Report No. 103-639]

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
    at 215 South Evans Street in Greenville, North Carolina, as the 
   ``Walter B. Jones Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 14, 1994

Mr. Traficant (for himself, Mr. Lancaster, and Mrs. Clayton) introduced 
the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Public Works 
                           and Transportation

                             August 1, 1994

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
    at 215 South Evans Street in Greenville, North Carolina, as the 
   ``Walter B. Jones Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 215 
South Evans Street in Greenville, North Carolina, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Walter B. Jones Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``Walter B. Jones Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.
```
[No. 2120.]

#### Oliver Spain *v.*The State.

1. Theft.— Indictment for theft, failing to allege that the property was *fraudulently*taken, is insufficient to charge the offense.

2. Same.— Note the suggestion of the court as to descriptive averments in an indictment for theft of animals of the equine species, which should be observed.

Appeal from the District Court of Grimes. Tried below before the Hon. Benton Randolph.

The conviction in this case was for the theft of a colt, the property of David Solley, in Grimes county, Texas, on the 25th day of October, 1883. A term of five years in the penitentiary was the penalty assessed against the appellant.

*McDaniel db*Dodd, for the appellant.

*J. jH. Burts,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State. ,

Willson, Judge.

This conviction is for the theft of a colt, and the indictment fails to allege that the taking was *fraudulent*and is therefore substantially defective. *(Sloan*v. *The State,*18 Texas Ct. App., 225.)

*470It is urged by defendant’s counsel that, as the evidence shows that' the animal was three years old when taken, it was- not a *colt as*alleged in the indictment, and that therefore there is a fatal variance between the allegation and the proof. This appeal has been prosecuted solely upon this supposed error. It is unnecessary that we should decide the question, but we will take occasion to remark that it is as easy, in charging this offense, to describe the animal as a *horse*as it is to describe it as a *colt,*and by so doing this question could not arise.

" Because the indictment is fatally defective the judgment is reversed and the prosecution is dismissed.

*Reversed and dismissed.*

[Opinion delivered December 2, 1885.]
#### § 26.31 General provisions.

Public recreation will be permitted on national wildlife refuges as an appropriate incidental or secondary use, only after it has been determined that such recreational use is practicable and not inconsistent with the primary objectives for which each particular area was established or with other authorized Federal operations.
No. 11-9631.

#### Daiak *v.*Florida.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.
#### §§ 95.2709-95.2717 [Reserved]