alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## NUMBER 13 - 21 - 00448 - CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

M IGUEL DIAZ , Appellant ,
v. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee.
On appeal from the 28th District Court of Nueces County , Texas.



## O R D E R
Before Justices H inojosa, Tijerina , and Silva Order Per Curia m
Appellant, Miguel Diaz , has filed a notice of appeal with this Court from his conviction in trial court cause number 21FC

- 0944A

. The trial court’s certification of the defendant’s right to appeal shows that th e defendant does not have the right to appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a)(2). The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that a defendant has a right of2 appeal is not made a part of the rec ord. Id. R. 25.2(d); see id. R. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. The purpose of the certification requirement is to efficiently sort appealable cases from non

appealable cases so that appealable cases can “move through the system unhindered while eliminating, at an ear ly stage, the time and expens e associated with non

appealable cases.” Greenwell v. Ct. of Apps. for the Thirteenth Jud. Dist. , 159 S.W.3d 645, 649 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see Hargesheimer v. State , 182 S.W.3d 906, 912 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Within thirty days of this notice, appellant’s lead appellate counsel, Sa ndra Eastwood , is hereby ORDERED to: 1) review the record; 2) determine whether appellant has a right to appeal; and 3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal and/or advise this Court as to the existence of any amended certification. If appellant’s counsel determines that appellant has a right to appeal, counsel is further ORDERED to file a motion with this Court within thirty days of this notice, identifying and explaining substantive reasons why appellant has a right to appeal. See
T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 44.3, 44.4; Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 614

– 15 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also, e.g., Carroll v. State , 119 S.W.3d 838, 841 (Tex. App.

— Sa n Antonio 2003, no pet.) (certifica tion form provided in appendix to appellate rules may be modified to reflect that defendant has right of appeal under circumstances not addressed by the form). The motion must include an analysis of the applicable case
l aw, and any factual allegations the rein must be true and supported by the record. See Dears , 154 S.W.3d at 614

– 15; c f. Woods v. State, 108 S.W.3d 314, 316 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (construing former appellate rule 25.2(b)(3) and holding that recitations in the notice of appeal must be true a nd supported by the record). Copies of record3 documents necessary to evaluate the alleged error in the certification affecting appellant’s right to appeal shall be attached to the motion. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10.1, 10.2. PER CURIAM Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2( b). Delivered and filed on the 16th day of December 2021

.
```

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 181 (Tuesday, September 19, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 54867]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7761]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

Veterans' Advisory Committee on Education; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs gives notice under Public Law 
92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Veterans' Advisory 
Committee on Education will meet on October 5-6, 2006. The meeting will 
be held at VA Central Office, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
in room 530. The sessions will convene at 8:30 a.m. each day. On 
October 5, the session will end at 4 p.m., and on October 6 at 12 noon. 
The meeting is open to the public.
    The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs on the administration of education and training programs for 
veterans, servicepersons, reservists, and dependents of veterans under 
Chapters 30, 32, 35, and 36 of title 38, and Chapter 1606 of title 10, 
United States Code.
    On October 5, the session will begin with opening remarks and an 
overview by Mr. James Bombard, Committee Chair. In addition, this 
session will include discussions on recent legislation, a total force 
GI Bill, remedial education programs and other needs of Iraq War 
veterans, use of private and corporate funds to support educational 
programs, and a contract call center. Oral statements from the public 
will be heard at 3:15 p.m. On October 6, the Committee will review and 
summarize issues addressed during this meeting.
    Interested persons may file written statements to the Committee 
before the meeting, or within 10 days after the meeting, with Mrs. 
Judith B. Timko, Designated Federal Officer, Department of Veterans 
Affairs, Benefits Administration (225B), 810 Vermont Aveneu, NW., 
Washington, DC 20420. Any member of the public wishing to attend the 
meeting should contact Mrs. Judith B. Timko or Mr. Robyn Noles at (202) 
273-7187.

    Dated: September 12, 2006.

    By direction of the Secretary.
E. Philip Riggin,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 06-7761 Filed 9-18-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
```
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                      Consent of Independent Accountants

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of the Catellus
Development Corporation Amended and Restated Executive Stock Option Plan, the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 of the Catellus Development Corporation
Profit Sharing & Savings Plan & Trust, the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of
the Catellus Development Corporation Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan,
Stock Purchase Program, Incentive Stock Compensation Pl an and Stock Option
Plan, the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of the Catellus Development
Corporation 1995 Stock Option Plan and the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of
the Catellus Development Corporation 1996 Performance Award Plan (Nos. 33-58143,
33-38827, 33-42124, 333-01215 and 333-04293, respectively) of our report dated
February 2, 1999, appearing on Page F-2 of this Form 10-K. We also consent to
the incorporation by reference of our report on the Financial Statement
Schedules, which appears o n page S-1 of this Form 10-K.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Francisco, California
March 31, 1999
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1


                              ISLAND PACIFIC, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES/OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Island Pacific, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Harvey Braun, Chairman of
the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, that this Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

                                   By:  /s/ HARVEY BRAUN
                                        -----------------------------
                                        Harvey Braun
                                        Chairmand of the Board and Chief
                                        Executive Officer
                                        (Principal Executive Officer and
                                        Principal Financial Officer)

Date: August 14, 2003
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 9, 2022

No. 04-22-00488-CR

EX PARTE Jose Manuel Montejo GOMEZ

From the County Court, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10450CR

Honorable Dennis Powell, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On December 2, 2022, the State filed an unopposed motion to consolidate, seeking 

consolidation of this case with seventeen others and for an extension of time to file its brief. We 

DENY the motion as to consolidation, but we GRANT the motion as to the extension of time and 

ORDER the State to file its brief by January 6, 2023. The State may file the same brief in 

multiple cases, if it so desires, by placing all appellate cause numbers in the style and by filing 

the brief separately in all cause numbers. Further requests for extensions of time will be 

disfavored.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of December, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
M otion GRANTED and Order filed October 3, 2014
.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14
- 14
- 00783
- CV

____________ IN RE KEVAN CASEY, J INSUN LLC, AND FAR E AST STRATEGIES LLC , Relator s

O RIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 113th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2012
- 54501



### ORDER
On October 1, 2014, relator Kevan Casey, Jinsun LLC, and Far East Strategies LLC, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. Relator s ask this court to order the Honorable Michael Landrum, Judge of the 113th District Court, in Harris County, Texas, to set aside his order dated September 15, 2014,entered in trial court number 2012

- 54501, styled Khaled Alattar v. Kevan Casey, et

al. Relator s claim respondent abused his discretion by denying their motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction

. Relator s ha ve also filed a motion for temporary stay of proceedings below. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(b), 52.10. On October 1, 2014, relators asked this court to stay proceedings in the trial court pending a decision on the petition for writ of mandamus. It appears fro m the facts stated in the petition and motion that relators ’ request for relief requires further consideration and that relator will be prejudiced unless immediate temporary relief is granted. We therefore GRANT relators ’ motion and issue the following or der:
We ORDER all proceedings in trial court cause number 2012

- 54501 , Khaled Alattar v. Kevan Casey, et al. , STAYED until a final decision by this court on relators ’ petition for writ of mandamus, or until further order of this court.
I n addition, the cour t requests the real party

- in

- interest, to file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before October 15, 2014

. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.4.
PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices McCally, Brown, and Wise.
#### § 301-73.103 What must we do when we approve an exception to the use of the E-Gov Travel Service?

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 77028, Sept. 20, 2024.

The head of your agency or their designee must approve an exception to the use of the ETS under § 301-73.102 in writing or through electronic means.

[FTR Amdt. 2003-07, 68 FR 71030, Dec. 22, 2003, as amended by FTR Amdt. 2007-05, 72 FR 61540, Oct. 31, 2007; FTR Case 2022-05, 89 FR 12253, Feb. 16, 2024]
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

 34

 36

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲

▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

06/18

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jun 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0895Improving the Identification, Investigation, and Reporting of Hate Crimes: A Summary Report of the Law Enforcement RoundtableIn 2018, the Hate Crimes Enforcement and Prevention Initiative convened a law enforcement roundtable on challenges and successes in identifying, reporting, and tracking hate crimes. Although hate crimes and other bias-motivated incidents are generally investigated and prosecuted as state, local, or tribal matters, the Federal Government collaborates with state and local partners in the effort to eliminate these crimes from our communities. Through robust discussion and analysis, roundtable participants developed recommendations for enhancing hate crimes investigation and reporting that comprise a valuable roadmap for the journey ahead.By U.S. Department of Justice Hate Crimes Enforcement and Prevention InitiativeCategories: Community PartnershipsLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0895Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Aug 2020Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 04:45 (UTC-5) in 0.93 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
#### Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Louise L. Williams, J. Harvey Ladew and Richard T. Green, as Trustees under the Last Will and Testament of Rebecca Ladew, Deceased.

(Surrogate’s Court, New York County,

February, 1910.)

Executors and administrators — Distribution of estate — Duty and propriety of payments or delivery and when payable—Advances on legacies — Bond or security to refund.

Payments of income from trust funds by testamentary trustees to the general guardian of an infant beneficiary during the pendency of proceedings for a judicial settlement of their accounts are proper without requiring a bond, for such income is neither a legacy nor a distributive share within the meaning of section 2746 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and such payments should be allowed to such trustees upon their next accounting.

Proceeding for the judicial settlement of the accounts of testamentary trustees.

Parsons, Closson *&*Mellvaine, for petitioners.

J. Campbell Thompson, for contestants.

Raymond M. Lowes, special guardian, etc.

Bernard J. Tinney, special guardian for Elise Wall Ladew, an infant.

Thomas, S.

After having procured the report of the learned referee who tried the issues in this proceeding to be set aside because it was filed too late, and after much litigation as to how the new trial was to be had, the special guardian objectant offered in evidence the record as made before the referee, and, this being received, all parties rested. I agree with everything that the referee has stated in his opinion, and I adopt that opinion as my own. The payments of income on the trust funds to the general guardian of the infant, pending the accounting and before the making of the former decree, required no bond, for such income is neither a *“*legacy ” nor a “ distributive share ” *418(Matter of Tucker, 28 Misc. Rep. 595), and the provision contained in the decree as to the filing of a bond required by section 2746, Code of Civil Procedure, did not defeat the right of the accountants to just credits for such payments. If an objection to the account had been made on that ground by the special guardian, and it was not made by him, such objection would have to be overruled.

The facts set forth in the report of the referee will be included in my decision and the separation of the funds of the separate trusts will be made as recommended by him. All of the objections to the account are overruled. The accountants will be paid costs of the proceeding out of the estate; no costs will be awarded to the special guardian. Tax costs and settle decision and decree on notice.

Decreed accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>     0001083449
<NAME>     Rubber Technology International, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>     1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                       99204
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                40270
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                  43232
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            182706
<PP&E>                                      783937
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             1922362
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       296178
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                      1289
<OTHER-SE>                                  545589
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               1922361
<SALES>                                     262282
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            262282
<CGS>                                        61142
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                61142
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             29087
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           44230
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (11267)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (11267)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                (11267)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0




</TABLE>
No. 11-5666.

#### Acker *v.*Arizona.

Ct. App. Ariz. Certiorari denied.
§ 80.169 Operators required to adjust transmitters or radar. ( a ) All adjustments of radio transmitters in any radiotelephone station or coincident with the installation, servicing, or maintenance of such equipment which may affect the proper operation of the station, must be performed by or under the immediate supervision and responsibility of a person holding a First Class Radiotelegraph Operator's Certificate, Second Class Radiotelegraph Operator's Certificate, Radiotelegraph Operator License, or General Radiotelephone Operator License.
( b ) Only persons holding a First Class Radiotelegraph Operator's Certificate, Second Class Radiotelegraph Operator's Certificate, or Radiotelegraph Operator License must perform such functions at radiotelegraph stations transmitting Morse code.
( c ) Only persons holding an operator certificate containing a ship radar endorsement must perform such functions on radar equipment.
[51 FR 31213, Sept. 2, 1986, as amended at 54 FR 40058, Sept. 29, 1989; 78 FR 23155, Apr. 18, 2013]
Exhibit 32.2





Certification of Chief Financial Officer of


Commercial National Financial Corporation


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Commercial National Financial Corporation (the “Corporation”) for the period ending December 31, 2009 (the “Report”), I, Thomas D. Watters, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Commercial National Financial Corporation.








/s/ Thomas D.WattersThomas D. WattersChief Financial OfficerMarch 26, 2010








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Commercial National Financial Corporation and will be retained by Commercial National Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 95.1907 Requesting regulatory status. ( a ) Authorizations for systems in the 218-219 MHz Service will be granted to provide services on a common carrier basis or a private (non-common carrier and/or private internal-use) basis. ( 1 ) *Initial applications.* An applicant will specify on FCC Form 601 if it is requesting authorizations to provide services on a common carrier, non-common carrier or private internal-use basis, or a combination thereof.
( 2 ) *Amendment of pending applications.* Any pending application may be amended to: ( i ) Change the carrier status requested; or
( ii ) Add to the pending request in order to obtain both common carrier and private status in a single license.
( 3 ) *Modification of license.* A licensee may modify a license to: ( i ) Change the carrier status authorized; or
( ii ) Add to the status authorized in order to obtain both common carrier and private status in a single license. Applications to change, or add to, carrier status in a license must be submitted on FCC Form 601 in accordance with § 1.1102 of this chapter.
( 4 ) *Pre-existing licenses.* Licenses granted before April 9, 2001 are authorized to provide services on a private (non-common carrier) basis. Licensees may modify this initial status pursuant to paragraph (a)(3) of this section.
( b ) An applicant or licensee may submit a petition at any time requesting clarification of the regulatory status required to provide a specific communications service.
§ 96.45 Additional requirements for category B CBSDs. ( a ) Category B CBSDs must be professionally installed.
( b ) In the 3550-3650 MHz band, Category B CBSDs must be authorized consistent with information received from an ESC, as described in § 96.15.
( c ) Category B CBSDs are limited to outdoor operations.
( d ) When registering with an SAS, Category B CBSDs must transmit all information required under § 96.39 plus the following additional information: antenna gain, beamwidth, azimuth, downtilt angle, and antenna height above ground level.
§ 78.21 Dismissal of applications. ( a ) Any application may, on request of the applicant, be dismissed without prejudice as a matter of right prior to the adoption date of any final action taken by the Commission with respect to the application. An applicant's request for the return of an application will be regarded as a request for dismissal.
( b ) Failure to prosecute an application, or failure to respond to official correspondence or request for additional information, will be cause for dismissal. Such dismissal will be without prejudice if it occurs prior to the adoption date of any final action taken by the Commission with respect to the application.
[37 FR 15927, Aug. 8, 1972]