alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P290Integrating Civilian Staff into Police AgenciesCivilianization of policing is one of the most frequent methods agencies use to continue providing service to the community while still tending to the pressing management and administration needs of an agency. Integrating Civilian Staff into Police Agencies describes issues surrounding the employment and use of civilian employees by police agencies in the United States. This publication discusses not only innovative ways that some agencies are using civilians but also impediments and facilitators to civilianization and the costs and benefits of increasing civilianization. It also provides general recommendations for agencies considering the increased use of civilian employees.By William R. King, Jeremy M. WilsonCategories: Community PartnershipsLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p290Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFBook • Dec 2014Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 02:30 (UTC-5) in 0.19 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 159 (Thursday, August 17, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 47497]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6985]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Decision To Evaluate a Petition To Designate a Class of Employees 
at Blockson Chemical Company (Also Known As Olin Mathieson), Joliet, 
IL, To Be Included in the Special Exposure Cohort

AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of 
Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) gives notice 
as required by 42 CFR 83.12(e) of a decision to evaluate a petition to 
designate a class of employees at Blockson Chemical Company (also known 
as Olin Mathieson), Jolit, Illinois, to be included in the Special 
Exposure Cohort under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness 
Compensation Program Act of 2000. The initial proposed definition for 
the class being evaluated, subject to a revision as warranted by the 
evaluation, is as follows:
    Facility: Blockson Chemical Company (also known as Olin Mathieson).
    Location: Joliet, Illinois.
    Job Titles and/or Job Duties: All workers who worked in Building 55 
at the Blockson Chemical Company.
    Period of Employment: January 1, 1951 to December 31, 1962.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Elliott, Director, Office of 
Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational 
Safety and Health, 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, OH 
45226, Telephone 513-533-6800 (this is not a toll-free number). 
Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#105f535143505354533e575f46"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="703f333123303334335e373f26">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: August 11, 2006.
John Howard,
Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 06-6985 Filed 8-16-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-19-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
ARTICLE
I
  Section 1.1  Places of Meetings
 Section 1.2  Annual Meeting
 Section 1.3  Special Meetings
 Section 1.4  Notice of Meetings
 - 1 -




---



##### 



Section 1.5  Matters to be Brought Before Stockholders Meetings
    - 2 -




---



##### 



Section 1.6  Quorum
 Section 1.7  Voting
 - 3 -




---



##### 



Section 1.8  Inspectors
 ARTICLE
II
  Section 2.1  General Powers
 Section 2.2  Number of Directors
 Section 2.3  Election and Removal of Directors; Quorum
   - 4 -




---



##### 



Section 2.4  Nominations of Director Candidates
 - 5 -




---



##### 



Section 2.5  Meetings of Directors
 Section 2.6  Compensation
 - 6 -




---



##### 



Section 2.7  Eligibility for Service as a Director
 ARTICLE
III
  Section 3.1  Executive Committee
 Section 3.2  Other Committees
 Section 3.3  Meetings
 Section 3.4  Quorum and Manner of Acting
 - 7 -




---



##### 



Section 3.5  Term of Office
 Section 3.6  Resignation and Removal
 Section 3.7  Vacancies
   Section 4.1  Election of Officers: Terms
 - 8 -




---



##### 



Section 4.2  Removal of Officers: Vacancies
 Section 4.3  Duties
 Section 4.4  Duties of the Chairman of the Board
 Section 4.5  Duties of the President
 - 9 -




---



##### 



Section 4.6  Duties of the Vice Presidents
 Section 4.7  Duties of the Treasurer
 Section 4.8  Duties of the Secretary
 - 10 -




---



##### 



Section 4.9  Compensation
 ARTICLE
V
  Section 5.1  Form of Shares
 Section 5.2  Lost, Destroyed and Mutilated Certificates
 Section 5.3  Transfer of Stock
 - 11 -




---



##### 



Section 5.4  Fixing Record Date
 ARTICLE
VI
  Section 6.1  Seal
 Section 6.2  Fiscal Year and Accounting
 - 12 -




---



##### 



Section 6.3  Checks, Notes and Drafts
 Section 6.4  Amendment of By-laws
 Section 6.5  Voting of Stock Held
 - 13 -




---



##### 



ARTICLE
VII
      - 14 -




---



##### 



/s/Edna T. Brannan, Secretary - 15 -
Exhibit 10.17


Amendment No. 2


This Amendment No. 2 to the July 24, 2002 Services Agreement (“Services Agreement”) is entered as of October 1, 2006 (the “Effective Date”) by and between FireMark Partners, LLC (“FireMark”) a Delaware limited liability company and Bristol West Holdings, Inc a Delaware corporation formerly known as BRW Acquisition, Inc. (“BRW”).


WHEREAS, BRW is required to pay monthly License Fees from and after the Effective Date totaling $900,000, subject to the terms and conditions of the Services Agreement and the Correction and Amendment of the Services Agreement dated November 8, 2005; and


WHEREAS, BRW and FireMark desire to satisfy such requirement with one single discounted payment of $818,091 on Friday October 6, 2006;


NOW THEREFORE, the Services Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

	
  
 
  	
  
On or around   October 6, 2006, BRW shall pay FireMark $818,091 in full satisfaction of its   remaining obligation to make License payments under Section 7.3 of the   Services Agreement.
  




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have signed this Amendment intending to be legally bound.

	
  BRISTOL WEST   HOLDINGS, INC.,
   f/k/a BRW ACQUISITION, INC.
  	
  
 
  	
  
FIREMARK   PARTNERS, LLC
  
	
  
 
  	
  
 
  	
  
 
  	
  
 
  	
  
 
  
	
  
 
  	
  
 
  	
  
 
  	
  
 
  	
  
 
  
	
  
By:
  	
  
/s/ Craig   Eisenacher
  	
  
 
  	
  
By:
  	
  
/s/ John   McManus
  
	
  
 
  	
  


  	
  
 
  	
  
 
  	
  


  
	
  Name:
  	
  Craig   Eisenacher
  	
   
  	
  Name:
  	
  John McManus
  
	
  Title:
  	
  Senior Vice   President
  	
   
  	
  Title:
  	
  Member
  
	
  Date:
  	
  10/4/06
  	
   
  	
  Date:
  	
  10/3/06
Strafford,

No. 4448.

#### Burton Walker *v.*Agnes T. Hayes.

Argued January 4, 1956.

Decided February 7, 1956.

*91*Burns, Calderwood & Bryant*and *Robert E. Hinchey [Mr. Hinchey*orally), for the plaintiff.

*McLane, Carleton, Graf, Greene & Brown*and *Robert A. Raulerson {Mr. Raulerson*orally), for the defendant.

Blandin, J.

This is an alternative contract *(Barker*v. *Jones,*8 N. H. 413; Restatement, Contracts, *ss.*325c, 344 *illustrations*1, 2), wherein the defendant has the option to satisfy her obligation by either cash or stock. Under this contract the plaintiff had no right to demand performance of a particular alternative. Restatement, Contracts, s. 325, *comment*e. As a result his damages are measured by “the alternative that will result in the smallest recovery.” *Id., s.*344; 5 Williston, Contracts, 3920-3922. However, the plaintiff argues that when the defendant failed to elect on or before April 5, 1953, this gave him the option of choosing, as he has endeavored to do, between the alternatives. The few cases which support such a rule have been criticized as lacking a sound basis (5 Corbin on Contracts, ss. 1079, 1081; *Williston, supra,*3922), and are contrary to our well established law that the parties’ intention controls. *Smart*v. *Hernandez,*95 N. H. 492, 496. There *92is no indication in the agreement before us that the parties meant to give the plaintiff the option to choose the alternative and his contention is rejected.

Indisputably, the smallest recovery is the stock which the plaintiff already has, and since there is no claim that the delay in transferring the shares caused him any damage, the order is

*Judgment for the defendant.*

All concurred.
Case 16-24865 Doc 1 Filed 08/02/16 Entered 08/02/16 16:29:32 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 9
Case 16-24865 Doc 1 Filed 08/02/16 Entered 08/02/16 16:29:32 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 9
Case 16-24865 Doc 1 Filed 08/02/16 Entered 08/02/16 16:29:32 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 9
Case 16-24865 Doc 1 Filed 08/02/16 Entered 08/02/16 16:29:32 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 9
Case 16-24865 Doc 1 Filed 08/02/16 Entered 08/02/16 16:29:32 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 9
Case 16-24865 Doc 1 Filed 08/02/16 Entered 08/02/16 16:29:32 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 9
Case 16-24865 Doc 1 Filed 08/02/16 Entered 08/02/16 16:29:32 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 9
Case 16-24865 Doc 1 Filed 08/02/16 Entered 08/02/16 16:29:32 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 9
Case 16-24865 Doc 1 Filed 08/02/16 Entered 08/02/16 16:29:32 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 9
#### LYMAN C. COLLINS v. ORLANDO L. RICHARDSON.

January Term, 1894.

*Trustee process. Right of flaintiff to move for continuance of suit between defendant and trustee.*

Where a third person has sued the plaintiff and summoned as his trustee the defendant in a suit pending in court, such person may, under R. L., s. 1126, enter-in the pending suit and move that the same be continued to await the conclusion of his trustee process, although his own suit has not yet been entered in court.

Action, assumpsit. Heard upon motion that the same be continued, to await the termination of trustee proceedings, at the May term, 1893, Windsor county, Munson, J., presiding. The motion was granted and the case continued. The plaintiff excepts.

The plaintiff brought suit against the defendant, and the cause was referred. The referee found a sum due the plaintiff and thereupon one Whitcomb sued the plaintiff and summoned the defendant as trustee. At the May term, that being the term at which the referee’s report was filed, Whitcomb entered and asked that the suit be continued pending his own trustee suit. The plaintiff claimed that, inasmuch as Whitcomb’s suit had not yet been entered in court, the court had no right, as a matter of law, to continue *90his suit. The court held otherwise, and the plaintiff excepted.

*Norman Paul*for the plaintiff.

Whitcomb had no suit in court, and courts of law cannot take cognizance of suits until they are entered in court. *Wilson*v. *Rutland and Addison Fire Ins. Co.,*19 Vt. 177 ; *Wadsworth*v. *Clark and Tr.,*14 Vt. 139.

*W. E. Johnson*for Whitcomb.

The court had power and ought to have continued the suit pending the trustee process. R. L., ss. 1125-7; *Twomhley & Sax*v. *Clark,*13 Vt. 124; *Wadsworth*v. *Clark, Tr.,*14 Vt. 139; *Spicer*v. *Spicer,*23 Vt. 678; *Jones & Dow*v. *Wood,*30 Vt. 268.

START, J.

John L. Whitcomb brought a suit against the plaintiff and summoned the defendant as trustee. .At the June term, 1893, Whitcomb appeared, as is provided in R. L., s. 1126, and moved that this cause be continued to await the termination of his trustee suit. The court below had authority to continue the cause on the application of the plaintiff in the trustee suit, on reasonable terms. R. L., s. 1126. The court continued the cause on terms thereafter to be determined. This was a proper exercise of its discretion, and its decision in this respect cannot be revised in this court.

*The order op continuance is affirmed and cause*remanded.
§ 80.1252 Designated entities. ( a ) This section addresses certain issues concerning designated entities in maritime communications services subject to competitive bidding.
( b ) *Eligibility for small business provisions.* ( 1 ) A small business is an entity that, together with its affiliates and controlling interests, has average gross revenues not to exceed $15 million for the preceding three years.
( 2 ) A very small business is an entity that, together with its affiliates and controlling interests, has average gross revenues not to exceed $3 million for the preceding three years.
( 3 ) [Reserved]
( 4 ) A consortium of small businesses (or a consortium of very small businesses) is a conglomerate organization formed as a joint venture between or among mutually independent business firms, each of which individually satisfies the definition in paragraph (b)(1) of this section (or each of which individually satisfies the definition in paragraph (b)(2) of this section). Where an applicant or licensee is a consortium of small businesses (or very small businesses), the gross revenues of each small business (or very small business) shall not be aggregated.
( c ) A winning bidder that qualifies as a small business, as defined in § 80.1252(b)(1), or consortium of small businesses may use the bidding credit specified in § 1.2110(f)(2)(ii) of this chapter. A winning bidder that qualifies as a very small business, as defined in § 80.1252(b(2), or consortium of very small businesses may use the bidding credit specified in § 1.2110(f)(2)(i) of this chapter.
( d ) A winning bidder that qualifies as a small business or a consortium of small businesses as defined in § 80.1252(b)(1) or § 80.1252(b)(5) of this subpart may use the bidding credit specified in § 1.2110(e)(2)(ii) of this chapter. A winning bidder that qualifies as a very small business or a consortium of very small businesses as defined in § 80.1252(b)(2) or § 80.1252(b)(5) of this subpart may use the bidding credit specified in § 1.2110(e)(2)(i) of this chapter.
[63 FR 40065, July 27, 1998, as amended at 68 FR 43000, July 21, 2003]
EXHIBIT 31.2: Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications





I, Ding Rencai, certify that:





1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of China Water Group, Inc. (the “Registrant”);




2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.  The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and have:




a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.  The issuer’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the smaller reporting Registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.




Date: December 27, 2011
/s/ Ding RencaiDing Rencai, Chief Executive Officer
#### § 95.345 Remote control.

Operation of Personal Radio Services stations by remote control is prohibited, unless otherwise allowed for a particular Personal Radio Service by rules in the subpart governing that specific service. *See e.g.,* §§ 95.945 and 95.1745.
No. 11-5613.

#### Miller *v.*Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

                    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and discussions could disclose confidential                           ( print page 54297)                        trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.                

*Name of Committee:*                         NIDCR Special Grants Review Committee, 07-01, Review RO3s, Ks, Fs.                    

*Date:*                         October 12-13, 2006.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Clarion Hotel Bethesda Park, 8400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Raj K. Krishnaraju, Ph.D., MS, Scientific Review Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, National Inst of Dental & Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Dr. Rm 4AN 32J, Bethesda, MD 20892. 301-594-4864.                         *kkrishna@nidcr.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS).

Dated: September 5, 2006.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 06-7628  Filed 9-13-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Case 16-25650 Doc 1 Filed 08/10/16 Entered 08/10/16 11:07:09 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 10
Case 16-25650 Doc 1 Filed 08/10/16 Entered 08/10/16 11:07:09 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 10
Case 16-25650 Doc 1 Filed 08/10/16 Entered 08/10/16 11:07:09 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 10
Case 16-25650 Doc 1 Filed 08/10/16 Entered 08/10/16 11:07:09 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 10
Case 16-25650 Doc 1 Filed 08/10/16 Entered 08/10/16 11:07:09 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 10
Case 16-25650 Doc 1 Filed 08/10/16 Entered 08/10/16 11:07:09 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 10
Case 16-25650 Doc 1 Filed 08/10/16 Entered 08/10/16 11:07:09 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 10
Case 16-25650 Doc 1 Filed 08/10/16 Entered 08/10/16 11:07:09 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 10
Case 16-25650 Doc 1 Filed 08/10/16 Entered 08/10/16 11:07:09 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 10
Case 16-25650 Doc 1 Filed 08/10/16 Entered 08/10/16 11:07:09 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 10