alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

                    In accordance with Departmental Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree in                     *United States*                     v.                     *Howard McKenzie & EBT Property Holding Co., Inc.*, No. 2:06-CV-02353, was lodged with the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina on August 23, 2006.                

                    The proposed Consent Decree concerns a compliant filed by the United States against Howard McKenzie & EBT Property Holding Co., Inc., pursuant to sections 301 and 404 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1311 and 1344, with respect to Defendants' alleged violations of the Clean Air Act by discharging pollutants into waters of                           ( print page 51851)                        the United States without a permit. The proposed Consent Decree resolves these allegations by requiring the restoration of the wetlands at issue and the payment of a civil penalty. The Department of Justice will accept written comments relating to this proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from the date of publication of this Notice. Please address comments to Marvin J. Caughman, Assistant United States Attorney, Wachovia Building, Suite 500, 1441 Main Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29201 and refer to                     *United States*                     v.                     *Howard McKenzie & EBT Property Holding Co., Inc.*, No. 2:06-CV-02353.                

                    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Clerk's Office, United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, United States Courthouse, 901 Richland Lane, Columbia, South Carolina. In addition, the proposed Consent Decree may be viewed at                     *http://www.usdoj.gov/​enrd/​open.html.*

Stephen Samuels,

Assistant Chief, Environmental Defense Section, Environment & Natural Resources Division.

[FR Doc. 06-7265 Filed 8-30-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       9,350
<SECURITIES>                                 9,884
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   121
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,672
<PP&E>                                       6,484
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,291
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,956
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,184
<BONDS>                                        872
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                        47
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,027
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,956
<SALES>                                     20,413
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,413
<CGS>                                        6,444
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,444
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            11,910
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             106
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,087
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,236
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,851
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,851
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .35




</TABLE>
§ 80.1095 Survival craft equipment. ( a ) At least three two-way VHF radiotelephone apparatus must be provided on every passenger ship and on every cargo ship of 500 tons gross tonnage and upwards. At least two two-way VHF radiotelephone apparatus must be provided on every cargo ship of between 300-500 tons gross tonnage. Portable two-way VHF radiotelephones must be stowed in such locations that they can be rapidly placed in any survival craft other than life rafts required by Regulation III/26.1.4 of the SOLAS Convention. (The SOLAS Convention can be purchased from International Maritime Organization (IMO), Publications, International Maritime Organization, 4 Albert Embankment, London SE1 7SR, United Kingdom; telephone 011 44 71 735 7611, *www.imo.org .*) Alternatively, survival craft may be fitted with a fixed two-way VHF radiotelephone installation. Two-way VHF radiotelephone apparatus, portable or fixed, must conform to performance standards as specified in § 80.1101.
( b ) At least one radar transponder or AIS-SART (collectively, “search and rescue locating devices”) must be carried on each side of every passenger ship and every cargo ship of 500 tons gross tonnage and upwards. At least one search and rescue locating device must be carried on every cargo ship of 300 tons gross tonnage and upwards but less than 500 tons gross tonnage. Such search and rescue locating devices must conform to performance standards as specified in § 80.233 for AIS-SARTs or § 80.1101 for radar transponders. The search and rescue locating devices must be stowed in such locations that they can be rapidly placed in any survival craft other than liferafts required on cargo ships in forward and aft areas (see Regulation III/26.1.4 of the SOLAS Convention). Alternatively, one search and rescue locating device must be stowed in each survival craft other than those required by Regulation III/26.1.4 of the SOLAS Convention. One of these search and rescue locating devices may be the search and rescue locating device required by § 80.1085(a)(3).
( c ) Survival craft equipment must be tested at intervals not to exceed twelve months. For batteries used for survival craft equipment, the month and year of its manufacture must be permanently marked on the battery. Also, the month and year upon which 50 percent of its useful life will expire must be permanently marked on both the battery and the outside of the transmitter. Batteries must be replaced if 50 percent of their useful life has expired or if the transmitter has been used in an emergency situation.
[57 FR 9065, Mar. 16, 1992, as amended at 73 FR 4490, Jan. 25, 2008; 81 FR 90748, Dec. 15, 2016]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0671

_________________

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF:

SHERRI L. FROST,

 Petitioner and Appellant,

 and

KEVIN ROY FROST,

 Respondent, Appellee,

 and Cross-Appellant,

 with

FROST LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,

 Respondent, Appellee,

 and Cross-Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Counsel for Appellant has filed a motion for extension of time to file her reply to 

Appellee and Cross-Appellant Kevin Frost’s response brief. The Court notes that Appellee 

and Cross-Appellant Frost Limited Partnership’s brief has not yet been filed. Thus, 

pursuant to M. R. App. P. 12(3), Appellant’s motion is premature. Appellant may file a 

reply brief in response to both Appellees and Cross-Appellants briefs after Frost Limited 

Partnership’s brief is filed.

IT IS ORDERED that the motion for extension is DENIED. 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 7 2023

08/07/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0671
#### Lloyd Kittrell, a minor, by S. J. Kittrell, *his next friend, Plaintiff in Error,*vs. E. F. Gilbert and W. T. Laney, co-partners under the firm name of Cottondale Gin Company, *Defendants in Error.*

143 So. 758.

Division B.

Decision filed September 14, 1932.

*671
      *James H. Finch,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*John E. Carter, John H. Carter, Jr.,*and *Howard S. Bcdley,*for Defendants in Error.

Pee Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is, hereby affirmed.

■Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 165 (Friday, August 25, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 50394]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7157]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Meeting of the Advisory Council on Dependents' Education

AGENCY: Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA).

ACTION:  Open Meeting Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Appendix 2 of 
title 5, United States Code, Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given 
that a meeting of the Advisory Council on Dependents' Education (ACDE) 
is scheduled to be held on September 26, 2006, from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. 
The meeting will be held at the DoDEA Headquarters Building, 4040 N. 
Fairfax Drive, Arlington, Virginia 22203. The purpose of the ACDE is to 
recommend to the Director, DoDEA, general policies for the operation of 
the Department of Defense Dependents Schools (DoDDS); to provide the 
Director with information about effective educational programs and 
practices that should be considered by DoDDS; and to perform other 
tasks as may be required by the Secretary of Defense. The meeting 
emphases will be the current operational qualities of schools and the 
institutionalized school improvement processes, as well as other 
educational matters. For further information contact Mr. Jim Jarrard at 
703-588-3121, or at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ffb59e929a8cd1b59e8d8d9e8d9bbf978ed19b909b9a9ed19a9b8a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e0aa818d8593ceaa819292819284a08891ce848f848581ce858495">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: August 18, 2006.
L.M. Bynum,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, DoD.
[FR Doc. 06-7157 Filed 8-24-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
 
                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT
 
Mercury Interactive (Israel) Limited, incorporated under the laws of Israel
 
Mercury Interactive (UK) LTD., incorporated under the laws of the United
Kingdom
 
Mercury Interactive France SARL, incorporated under the laws of France
 
Mercury Interactive GmbH, incorporated under the laws of Germany
 
Mercury Interactive (Europe) BV, incorporated under the laws of The Netherlands
 
Mercury Interactive (Canada) Inc., incorporated under the laws of Canada
 
Mercury Interactive Japan K.K., incorporated under the laws of Japan
 
Mercury Interactive (Australia) Pty ltd., incorporated under laws of Australia
 
Mercury Interactive (Singapore) LTD., incorporated under the laws of Singapore
 
Mercury Interactive (Belgium)--Benelux Branch, registered under the laws of
Belgium
 
Mercury Interactive Brasil Limitada, incorporated under the laws of Brazil
 
Mercury Interactive NORDIC AB, incorporated under the laws of Norway
5 November 2015

040P15-4

#### State v. Napoleon Junior Rankin

1. Defs *Pro Se*Motion for Production and Disclosure

1. Dismissed

2. Defs *Pro Se*Motion for Appeal of Judgments

2. Dismissed
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Ronald S. Friend, the Chief Financial Officer of Reddi Brake Supply Corporation (the ACompany@), certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c) presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6. I have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: September 27, 2005                                                 By: /s/ Ronald S. Friend

Ronald S. Friend



Chief Financial Officer
§ 96.1 Scope. ( a ) This section sets forth the regulations governing use of devices in the Citizens Broadband Radio Service. Citizens Broadband Radio Service Devices (CBSDs) may be used in the frequency bands listed in § 96.11. The operation of all CBSDs shall be coordinated by one or more authorized Spectrum Access Systems (SASs).
( b ) The Citizens Broadband Radio Service includes Priority Access and General Authorized Access tiers of service. Priority Access Licensees and General Authorized Access Users must not cause harmful interference to Incumbent Users and must accept interference from Incumbent Users. General Authorized Access Users must not cause harmful interference to Priority Access Licensees and must accept interference from Priority Access Licensees.
§ 76.1300 Definitions. As used in this subpart: ( a ) *Affiliated.* For purposes of this subpart, entities are affiliated if either entity has an attributable interest in the other or if a third party has an attributable interest in both entities.
( b ) *Attributable interest.* The term “attributable interest” shall be defined by reference to the criteria set forth in Notes 1 through 5 to § 76.501 provided, however, that: ( 1 ) The limited partner and LLC/LLP/RLLP insulation provisions of Note 2(f) shall not apply; and
( 2 ) The provisions of Note 2(a) regarding five (5) percent interests shall include all voting or nonvoting stock or limited partnership equity interests of five (5) percent or more.
( c ) *Buying groups.* The term “buying group” or “agent,” for purposes of the definition of a multichannel video programming distributor set forth in paragraph (e) of this section, means an entity representing the interests of more than one entity distributing multichannel video programming that: ( 1 ) Agrees to be financially liable for any fees due pursuant to a satellite cable programming, or satellite broadcast programming, contract which it signs as a contracting party as a representative of its members or whose members, as contracting parties, agree to joint and several liability; and
( 2 ) Agrees to uniform billing and standardized contract provisions for individual members; and
( 3 ) Agrees either collectively or individually on reasonable technical quality standards for the individual members of the group.
( d ) *Multichannel video programming distributor.* The term “multichannel video programming distributor” means an entity engaged in the business of making available for purchase, by subscribers or customers, multiple channels of video programming. Such entities include, but are not limited to, a cable operator, a BRS/EBS provider, a direct broadcast satellite service, a television receive-only satellite program distributor, and a satellite master antenna television system operator, as well as buying groups or agents of all such entities.
( e ) *Video programming vendor.* The term “video programming vendor” means a person engaged in the production, creation, or wholesale distribution of video programming for sale.
[58 FR 60395, Nov. 16, 1993, as amended at 64 FR 67197, Dec. 1, 1999; 69 FR 72046, Dec. 10, 2004]
Exhibit 4.17

LOGO



SEE REVERSE
SIDE FOR RESTRICTIONS

Lighting Science®

NUMBER

U

UNITS

CUSIP 53224G 50 9

LIGHTING SCIENCE GROUP CORPORATION

INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

Each Unit Consisting of One Share of Series D Non-Convertible Preferred Stock and One Warrant to Purchase One Share of
Common Stock

This Certifies that

is the owner of

Units.

Each Unit (Unit) consists of one (1) share of Series D Non-Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.001
per share (Series D Preferred Stock), of LIGHTING SCIENCE GROUP CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (the Company), and one warrant (the Warrant). Each Warrant entitles the holder to purchase one (1) share of
the Companys common stock, $0.001 par value per share (Common Stock) for $6.00 per share (subject to adjustment). Each Warrant is immediately exercisable and will expire unless exercised before 5:00 p.m. New York City Time, on
March 3, 2022 (the Expiration Date). Until the redemption date of the shares of Series D Preferred Stock represented by this certificate, the share(s) of Series D Preferred Stock and Warrant(s) comprising the Units represented by
this certificate are not transferable separately, and any sale, transfer or assignment of Units must consist of at least 25,000 Units. The terms of the Series D Preferred Stock are governed by the Certificate of Designation of the Series D Preferred
Stock (the Certificate of Designation), filed by the Company with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on September 2, 2009, and are subject to the terms and provisions contained therein, all of which terms and provisions
the holder of this certificate consents to by acceptance hereof. The terms of the Warrants are governed by a Warrant Agreement, between the Company and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Warrant Agent, and are subject to the terms
and provisions contained therein, all of which terms and provisions the holder of this certificate consents to by acceptance hereof. Copies of the Certificate of Designation and Warrant Agreement are on file at the office of the Company at 1227
South Patrick Drive, Building 2A, Satellite Beach, Florida 32937, and are available to any Unit holder on written request and without cost.

This certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent and Registrar of the Company. Witness the
facsimile seal of the Company and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers.

COUNTERSIGNED AND
REGISTERED:

AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER TRUST& COMPANY, LLC

(New York, NY)

BY:

Transfer Agent and Registrar

Authorized Signature

President

LIGHTING SCIENCE GROUP CORPORATION

CORPORATE

SEAL

1988

Secretary
§ 68.417 Informal complaints; form and content. ( a ) An informal complaint alleging a violation of hearing aid compatibility and/or volume control rules in this subpart may be transmitted to the Consumer Information Bureau by any reasonable means, e.g., letter, facsimile transmission, telephone (voice/TRS/TTY), Internet e-mail, ASCII text, audio-cassette recording, and Braille.
( b ) An informal complaint shall include: ( 1 ) The name and address of the complainant;
( 2 ) The name and address of the responsible party, if known, or the manufacturer or provider against whom the complaint is made;
( 3 ) A full description of the terminal equipment about which the complaint is made;
( 4 ) The date or dates on which the complainant purchased, acquired or used the terminal equipment about which the complaint is being made;
( 5 ) A complete statement of the facts, including documentation where available, supporting the complainant's allegation that the defendant has failed to comply with the requirements of this subpart;
( 6 ) The specific relief or satisfaction sought by the complainant, and
( 7 ) The complainant's preferred format or method of response to the complaint by the Commission and defendant (e.g., letter, facsimile transmission, telephone (voice/TRS/TTY), Internet e-mail, ASCII text, audio-cassette recording, Braille; or some other method that will best accommodate the complainant's disability).
[66 FR 7587, Jan. 24, 2001]