alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 16-25983 Doc 1 Filed 08/12/16 Entered 08/12/16 15:46:33 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 10
Case 16-25983 Doc 1 Filed 08/12/16 Entered 08/12/16 15:46:33 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 10
Case 16-25983 Doc 1 Filed 08/12/16 Entered 08/12/16 15:46:33 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 10
Case 16-25983 Doc 1 Filed 08/12/16 Entered 08/12/16 15:46:33 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 10
Case 16-25983 Doc 1 Filed 08/12/16 Entered 08/12/16 15:46:33 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 10
Case 16-25983 Doc 1 Filed 08/12/16 Entered 08/12/16 15:46:33 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 10
Case 16-25983 Doc 1 Filed 08/12/16 Entered 08/12/16 15:46:33 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 10
Case 16-25983 Doc 1 Filed 08/12/16 Entered 08/12/16 15:46:33 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 10
Case 16-25983 Doc 1 Filed 08/12/16 Entered 08/12/16 15:46:33 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 10
Case 16-25983 Doc 1 Filed 08/12/16 Entered 08/12/16 15:46:33 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 10
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4950 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4950

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENT
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                    September 30 (legislative day, September 12), 1994.
      Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 
4950) entitled ``An Act to extend the authorities of the Overseas 
Private Investment Corporation, and for other purposes'', do pass with 
the following

                               AMENDMENT:

            Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert:

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``OPIC Amendments Act of 1994''.

SEC. 2. RAISING CEILING ON INSURANCE.

    Section 235(a)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 
2195(a)(1)) is amended by striking ``$9,000,000,000'' and inserting 
``$12,000,000,000''.

SEC. 3. RAISING CEILING ON INVESTMENT GUARANTEES.

    Section 235(a)(2) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 
2195(a)(2)) is amended--
            (1) by striking subparagraph (B);
            (2) by striking ``(A)'' after ``Guarantees.--''; and
            (3) by striking ``$2,500,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$5,000,000,000''.

SEC. 4. EXTENDING ISSUING AUTHORITY.

    Section 235(a)(3) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 
2195(a)(3)) is amended by striking ``1994'' and inserting ``1995''.

SEC. 5. ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.

    Section 235 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2195) 
is amended by striking subsection (g).

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4953 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4953

  To amend the Clean Air Act to prohibit the Environmental Protection 
  Agency from promulgating a Federal Implementation Plan prior to the 
disapproval of State implementation plan revisions required pursuant to 
     the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 12, 1994

   Mr. Kim introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Clean Air Act to prohibit the Environmental Protection 
  Agency from promulgating a Federal Implementation Plan prior to the 
disapproval of State implementation plan revisions required pursuant to 
     the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FEDERAL IMPLEMENTATION PLANS.

    Section 110(n) of the Clean Air Act is amended by adding the 
following new paragraph at the end thereof:
            ``(4) Prohibition of fips prior to disapproval of state 
        plans.--Until the Administrator has disapproved state 
        implementation plan revisions submitted in accordance with the 
        amendments made to this Act by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 
        1990 (Public Law 101-549) nothing in this section or in any 
        other provision of this Act shall be construed to authorize or 
        require the Administrator to promulgate or enforce an 
        applicable implementation plan (or portion thereof) pursuant to 
        any court order or settlement to the extent that such court 
        order or settlement is based upon requirements in effect under 
        this Act prior to the enactment of the Clean Air Act Amendments 
        of 1990 (Public Law 101-549).''.
                                 <all>
```
#### *Morris v. Peregoy.

April Term, 1851,

Bichmond.

(Absent Cabell, P.)

Detinue—Female Slave—Recovery.*—In an action of *detinue*for a female slave, tbe recovery may be, not only for the slave named in the writ, but for her children born since the commencement of the action.

This was an action of detinue brought in the Circuit court of Orange county, by Thomas H. Peregoy against George Morris, for the recovery of four slaves, one of whom was named Fanny. On the trial an in*155struction was asked for by the defendant and refused by the Court, and another im struction was given ; and exceptions were taken, but it is *not*important to report them. The jury found a verdict for the four slaves mentioned in the writ and declaration, and also for a fifth, the child of Fanny, born since the institution of the suit; and there was judgment accordingly; whereupon Morris applied to this Court for a supersedeas, which was awarded.

Lyons, for the appellant, and Robert G. Scott, for the appellee, submitted the case on printed notes.

*

See monographic *note*on “Detinue and Replevin."

By the Court.

The judgment is affirmed.
Argued and submitted September 29,

reversed and remanded November 2, 1994

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Appellant, v.*SCOTT ALAN ROVIG, *Respondent.*

(10-92-06058A; CA A78814)

883 P2d 1339

Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Diane L. Alessi, Chief Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Landau, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded. *State v. Conger,*319 Or 484, 878 P2d 1089 (1994).
No. 11-9842.

#### Kilgore *v.*Walker, Acting Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      18,405,426
<SECURITIES>                                33,660,930
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                123,345,783
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          38,686
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             209,337,961
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         52
<COMMON>                                       649,489
<OTHER-SE>                               (396,925,410)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               209,337,961
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          (50,663,640)
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            91,729,739
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             8,267,267
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          46,438,779
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (220,711,676)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    38,267
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (220,749,943)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                             (241,076,879)<F2>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (4.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.11)
<FN>
<F1>The Company makes use of an unclassified balance sheet style due to the nature
of its business. Current Assets and Current Liabilities are therefore reflected
as zero in accordance with the instructions of Appendix E to the EDGAR filer
Manual.
<F2>Net income represents net earnings applicable to commom stock.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### §§ 95.907-95.917 [Reserved]
Merrimack,

No. 4514.

#### State *v.*Elmer Herbert Ellsworth.

Argued June 6, 1956.

Decided July 6, 1956.

*302
      *Louis C. Wyman,*Attorney General, *Warren E. Waters,*Deputy Attorney General, and *John W. Stanley, Jr.,*county solicitor *{Mr.*Waters orally), for the State.

*James C. Cleveland*(by brief and orally), for the defendant.

Blandin, J.

The record discloses that when the motion to dismiss was made prior to the trial the county solicitor, in response to a question by the defendant’s attorney, stated that the offense charged was under RSA 580:1, and added, “False Pretenses is the title.” The material portions of this statute read as follows: “False Pretenses. If any person, with intent to cheat or defraud, shall, by personating or representing another, or by means of any false pretense or false token, counterfeit letters, or other false means, wrongfully obtain any money or other property ... or shall, by any such means, attempt so to cheat or defraud another”; he shall be fined or imprisoned. It was neither alleged in the indictment nor proven at the trial that the defendant obtained *303money, property, or anything whatsoever within the meaning of *s.*1, *supra.*The indictment followed neither the words of the statute nor the form suggested in Justice & Sheriff, c. 39 (1931 *ed.).*Since no offense was charged under RSA 580:1 the defendant could not have been convicted of an attempt to commit that offense. See *State*v. *Skillings,*98 N. H. 203, 206. The defendant’s motion to dismiss should have been granted. *State*v. *Mealey,*100 N. H. 228, and authorities cited.

The State also argues that an offense was charged under the fraudulent check statute. RSA 582:12. The difficulty with this contention is that the record discloses that the defendant was tried and sentenced under RSA 580:1, the false pretenses statute, upon an invalid indictment. It follows the order is

*Indictment quashed.*

All concurred.
§ 80.288 Direction finding and homing equipment. Each compulsory ship of 1,600 gross tons or over whose keel was laid: ( a ) *Prior to May 25, 1980,* must be equipped with radio direction finding apparatus in operating condition and approved by the Commission during an inspection.
( b ) *On or after May 25, 1980,* must be equipped with radio direction finding apparatus having a homing capability in accordance with § 80.824.
[51 FR 31213, Sept. 2, 1986, as amended at 63 FR 29960, June 1, 1998. Redesignated at 68 FR 46973, Aug. 7, 2003]
#### § 95.2759 [Reserved]
No. 11-10147.

#### Chronister *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 173 (Thursday, September 7, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 52760]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7482]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Plumas County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC)

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Plumas County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will hold 
a meeting on September 29, 2006, in Quincy, CA. The purpose of the 
meeting is to discuss residual funding and recommend how it might be 
distributed. The funding is available under the Title II Provisions of 
the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000. 
Several Cycle 6 projects not yet approved will be included in the 
discussion and could potentially be recommended to the Plumas (PNF) or 
Lassen (LNF) National Forest Supervisor for funding. Cost overruns for 
other projects will also be considered among other alternatives.

DATES AND ADDRESSES: The meeting will take place from 9-12 at the 
Mineral Building--Plumas/Sierra County Fairgrounds, 208 Fairgrounds 
Road, Quincy, CA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lee Anne Schramel Taylor, Forest 
Coordinator, USDA, Plumas National Forest, P.O. Box 11500/159 Lawrence 
Street, Quincy, CA 95971; (530) 283-7850; or by E-Mail. 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cda8acb9acb4a1a2bf8dabbee3aba8a9e3b8be"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="492c283d283025263b092f3a672f2c2d673c3a">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda items for the September 29 meeting 
include: (1) Forest Service Update; (2) Residual funding availability; 
(3) Recommendations for funding distribution, potentially including 
current Cycle 6 projects not yet approved; and, (3) Review future 
meeting schedule and agenda. The meetings are open to the public and 
individuals may address the Committee after being recognized by the 
Chair. Other RAC information including previous meeting agendas and 
minutes may be obtained at http://www.notes.fs.fed.us:81/r4/payments_to_states.

    Dated: August 30, 2006.
Robert G. Macwhorter,
Deputy Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 06-7482 Filed 9-6-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 10.11


     

    
      	
                Exhibit
                10.11

            


    

     

    

      
        	
                2007
                  Executive Incentive Plan Targets

              
	 	
                 
 
	
                Senior
                  Manager

              	
                2007
                  Executive Incentive Plan

                Target
                  as a Percentage

                of
                  2007 Base Salary

              
	 	 
	
                Gary
                  D. Blackford

              	
                85%

              
	
                Rex
                  T. Clevenger

              	
                75%

              
	
                Timothy
                  W. Kuck

              	
                70%

              
	
                Joseph
                  P. Schiesl

              	
                70%

              
	
                Jeffrey
                  L. Singer

              	
                70%

              
	
                Walter
                  T. Chesley

              	
                65%

              
	
                David
                  G. Lawson

              	
                65%

              
	
                Diana
                  Vance-Bryan

              	
                65%

              
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	
                Target
                  Achievement *

              	
                Bonus
                  Payout

              
	 	 
	
                110%

              	
                200%

              
	
                105%

              	
                150%

              
	
                100%

              	
                100%

              
	
                99%

              	
                90%

              
	
                98%

              	
                80%

              
	
                97%

              	
                70%

              
	
                96%

              	
                60%

              
	
                65%

              	
                50%

              
	
                94%

              	
                40%

              
	
                93%

              	
                30%

              
	
                <93%

              	
                zero

              


      

    


    
      	 	 	
            	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	
              *
                The target is set by the compensation committee and the board of
                directors

            
	 	 
	 	
              Scale
                Methodology

            	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	
              Directionally,
                every 1% variance to Target has a 10 times multiplier, with
                bookends

            
	 	
              at
                110% and 93%, subject to to the discretion of the compensation
                

            
	 	
              committee
                and the board of
                directors.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5153 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5153

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for an open 
enrollment period under part B of the medicare program for individuals 
    formerly covered as retirees under group health plans of local 
                         educational agencies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 30, 1994

Mr. Stark introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to 
        the Committees on Ways and Means and Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for an open 
enrollment period under part B of the medicare program for individuals 
    formerly covered as retirees under group health plans of local 
                         educational agencies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OPEN ENROLLMENT UNDER PART B FOR RETIREES FORMERLY COVERED 
              UNDER GROUP HEALTH PLANS OF LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES.

    (a) In General.--Section 1837(i)(1)(A) of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1395p(i)(1)(A)) is amended by striking ``employment,'' and 
inserting ``employment (or by reason of the individual's or the 
individual's spouse's former employment with a local educational 
agency),''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 1837(i)(3)(A) of such Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395p(i)(3)(A)) is amended by inserting ``(or former)'' after 
``current''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by section 1 shall take effect January 1, 1995.
                                 <all>
```
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P332Health, Safety, and Wellness Program Case Studies in Law EnforcementIn this publication, the Major Cities Chiefs Association and the U.S. Department of Justice's Officer Safety and Wellness (OSW) Group present four recent case studies that serve as models for safety, health, and wellness programs focused on the physical and psychological health of officers. The OSW Group conducted site visits, assessed programs, and questioned participants to identify practical strategies for reducing the incidence of diabetes, promoting physical fitness, providing rehabilitation services, and addressing other health issues.By Joseph B. Kuhns, Edward R. Maguire, Nancy R. LeachCategories: Police OperationsLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p332Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFBook • Oct 2015Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 02:28 (UTC-5) in 0.19 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1
SANTA FE TOW AND 2 EMERGENCY LOCK & 3 KEY, 4 Protestants-Appellants, 5
v. NO. 34,881 6 NEW MEXICO TAXATION AND 7 REVENUE DEPARTMENT , 8 Respondent-Appellee, 9 and 10 IN THE MATTER OF THE PROTEST OF 11 SANTA FE TOW TO ASSESSMENT ISSUED 12 UNDER ID# L1332888896 AND EMERGENCY 13 LOCK & KEY TO ASSESSMENT ISSUED UNDER 14 ID# L0837170496 15 APPEAL FROM THE TAXATION & REVENUE DEPARTMENT 16 Monica Ontiveros, Hearing Officer 17 Marrs Griebel Law, Ltd. 18 Clinton W. Marrs 19 Patrick Griebel 20 Albuquerque, NM 21 for Appellants 222 Taxation & Revenue Department 1 Peter Breen 2 Santa Fe, NM 3 for Appellee 4
MEMORANDUM OPINION 5 KENNEDY, Judge. 6 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 7 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 8 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 9 {2} AFFIRMED. 10 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 11

_______________________________ 12 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge 13
WE CONCUR: 14

___________________________________ 15 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge 16

_________________________________ 173 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge 1