alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Sarah Brassack, Appellant, *v.*The Interborough Rapid Transit Company, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

February, 1910.)

Security for costs — Persons who may be required to give — Persons who are non-residents.

Residence in the borough of Brooklyn is residence without the city or county where the City Court of the city of New York is located; and a plaintiff residing there may be required to give security for costs in an action in said court.

Appeal by the plaintiff from an order of the City Court of the city of New York directing the plaintiff to furnish security for costs.

Louis M. Block (Isaac Siegel, of counsel), for appellant.

James L. Quackenbush (Bayard H. Ames and John Montgomery, of counsel), for respondent.

Seabury, J.

Upon the affidavits submitted, the court was justified in concluding that the plaintiff resides with her husband at 641 Blake avenue, borough of Brooklyn, city of Yew York. Under these circumstances the court below was authorized to require her to furnish security for costs under section 3268 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

In so far as section 3268 is applicable to the City Court of the city of ¡New York, it is subject to the qualifications and exceptions contained in sections 3159 and 3160 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Section 3268 of the Code authorizes the defendant to require security for costs when the plaintiff resides without “ the city or county * * * wherein the court is located.” In so far as this section applies to the City Court of the city of ¡New York, residence in the - borough of Brooklyn is not residence within the city or county where the City Court is located. The plaintiff being neither a resident nor within *190the provisions of section 3160 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the order requiring her to furnish security, for costs was proper.

Guy and Whitney, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

In re: 

CHAUNCEY ELLIS

Debtor(s)

Case No. 16-23427

CHAPTER 13 STANDING TRUSTEE’S FINAL REPORT AND ACCOUNT

Tom Vaughn, chapter 13 trustee, submits the following Final Report and Account of the 

administration of the estate pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1302(b)(1). The trustee declares as follows:

1) The case was filed on 07/21/2016.

2) The plan was confirmed on NA .

3) The plan was modified by order after confirmation pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1329 on

NA .

4) The trustee filed action to remedy default by the debtor in performance under the plan 

on NA .

5) The case was dismissed on 08/11/2016.

6) Number of months from filing to last payment: 0.

7) Number of months case was pending: 2.

8) Total value of assets abandoned by court order: NA .

9) Total value of assets exempted: NA .

10) Amount of unsecured claims discharged without payment: $0.00.

11) All checks distributed by the trustee relating to this case have cleared the bank.

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (09/01/2009)

Case 16-23427 Doc 13 Filed 09/13/16 Entered 09/13/16 15:05:43 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 3
Receipts:

Total paid by or on behalf of the debtor $0.00

Less amount refunded to debtor $0.00

NET RECEIPTS: $0.00

Expenses of Administration:

Attorney’s Fees Paid Through the Plan $0.00

Court Costs $0.00

Trustee Expenses & Compensation $0.00

Other $0.00

TOTAL EXPENSES OF ADMINISTRATION: $0.00

Attorney fees paid and disclosed by debtor: $0.00

Scheduled Creditors:

Creditor

Name Class

Claim

Scheduled

Claim

Asserted

Claim

Allowed

Int.

Paid

Principal

Paid

Summary of Disbursements to Creditors:

Secured Payments:

Mortgage Ongoing

Mortgage Arrearage

Debt Secured by Vehicle

All Other Secured

TOTAL SECURED:

Priority Unsecured Payments:

Domestic Support Arrearage

Domestic Support Ongoing

All Other Priority

TOTAL PRIORITY:

GENERAL UNSECURED PAYMENTS:

Claim

Allowed

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Principal

Paid

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Interest

Paid

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (09/01/2009)

Case 16-23427 Doc 13 Filed 09/13/16 Entered 09/13/16 15:05:43 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 3
Disbursements:

Expenses of Administration $0.00

Disbursements to Creditors $0.00

TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS : $0.00

12) The trustee certifies that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 5009, 

the estate has been fully administered, the foregoing summary is true and complete, and all 

administrative matters for which the trustee is responsible have been completed. The trustee 

requests a final decree be entered that discharges the trustee and grants such other relief as may 

be just and proper.

Dated: 09/13/2016

STATEMENT: This Unified Form is associated with an open bankruptcy case, therefore, Paperwork Reduction 

Act exemption 5 C.F.R. § 1320.4(a)(2) applies.

By:/s/ Tom Vaughn

Trustee

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (09/01/2009)

Case 16-23427 Doc 13 Filed 09/13/16 Entered 09/13/16 15:05:43 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 3
exv10w22



 







    Exhibit 10.22



 




    Summary
    of Director Compensation



 



    Our non-employee directors, other than the Chairman of the Audit
    Committee, receive an annual retainer of $36,000, plus an
    additional $1,500 for each meeting attended. The Chairman of the
    Audit Committee receives an annual retainer of $36,000, plus an
    additional $2,500 for each meeting attended. In addition, it is
    the intention of the Compensation Committee to award each of our
    non-employee directors on an annual basis 20,000 options, such
    options to vest on the first anniversary of the date of grant.
    Accordingly, in January 2006 and January 2007, we granted each
    of our non-employee directors options to purchase
    20,000 shares of our common stock, such options to vest on
    the first anniversary of the date of grant. We do not pay
    employee members of our Board of Directors separately for their
    service on our Board of Directors.
EXHIBIT 10.5A

                        AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                        ---------------------------------

     THIS  AMENDMENT  ("AMENDMENT")  is made as of the 31st day of May, 2002, by
and between  RETURN ON  INVESTMENT  CORPORATION,  a  corporation  organized  and
existing under the laws of the State of Delaware (hereinafter referred to as the
"Employer")  and AROL WOLFORD,  an individual  resident of Georgia  (hereinafter
referred to as the "Employee").

                              W I T N E S S E T H:
                              --------------------

     WHEREAS,   Employee  and  the  Employer  have  entered  into  that  certain
Employment Agreement dated January 18, 2002 (the "Employment Agreement"); and

     WHEREAS,  the Employer and the Employee  desire to amend  certain terms and
conditions of the Employment Agreement;

     NOW,  THEREFORE,  in  consideration  of the mutual covenants and agreements
contained  herein  and  other  good and  valuable  consideration,  the  receipt,
adequacy and  sufficiency of which are hereby  acknowledged,  the parties hereto
agree as follows:

     1.   Notwithstanding   anything  contained  in  the  Employment  Agreement,
effective  as of July 1,  2002,  Employee  shall  serve as  President  and Chief
Executive Officer of Employer.

     2.   All other terms and conditions of the Employment  Agreement  remain in
full force and effect.

     IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the Employer has caused this Amendment to be executed
by its  duly  authorized  representative  and the  Employee  has  executed  this
Amendment as set forth below.

RETURN ON INVESTMENT CORPORATION


By: /s/ Charles A. McRoberts
    ------------------------------
    Charles A. McRoberts, Chairman


By: /s/ Charles Pecchio, Jr.
    ------------------------------
    Charles Pecchio, Jr., CEO

[CORPORATE SEAL]

EMPLOYEE:


/s/ Arol Wolford                  [SEAL]
    ------------------------------
    Arol Wolford
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 180 (Monday, September 18, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 54710]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7744]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE


Sunshine Act Meeting

DATE AND TIME: Thursday, September 28, 2006, 9 a.m.-4 p.m.

LOCATION: 1200 17th Street, NW., Suite 200, Washington, DC 20036-3011.

STATUS: Open Session--Portions may be closed pursuant to Subsection (c) 
of Section 552(b) of Title 5, United States Code, as provided in 
subsection 1706(h)(3) of the United States Institute of Peace Act, 
Public Law 98-525.

AGENDA: September 28, 2006 Board Meeting; Approval of Minutes of the 
One Hundred Twenty-Third Meeting (June 14, 2006) of the Board of 
Directors; Chairman's Report; President's Report; Consideration of 
Recommended Grants; Iraq Study Group Update; Other General Issues.

CONTACT: Tessie F. Higgs, Executive Office, Telephone: (202) 429-3836.

    Dated: September 11, 2006.
Patricia P. Thomson,
Executive Vice President, United States Institute of Peace.
[FR Doc. 06-7744 Filed 9-14-06; 11:36 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-AR-M
Case 16-27070 Doc 6 Filed 08/23/16 Entered 08/23/16 16:03:36 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
§ 90.541 Transmitting power and antenna height limits. The transmitting power and antenna height of base, mobile, portable and control stations operating in the 769-775 MHz and 799-805 MHz frequency bands must not exceed the maximum limits in this section. Power limits are listed in effective radiated power (ERP). ( a ) The transmitting power and antenna height of base stations must not exceed the limits given in paragraph (a) of § 90.635.
( b ) The transmitting power of a control station must not exceed 200 watts ERP.
( c ) The transmitting power of a mobile unit must not exceed 100 watts ERP.
( d ) The transmitting power of a portable (hand-held) unit must not exceed 3 watts ERP.
( e ) Transmitters operating on the narrowband low power channels listed in § 90.531(b)(3) and (4), must not exceed 2 watts ERP.
[79 FR 71326, Dec. 2, 2014]
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 169 (Thursday, August 31, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 51839]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7335]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel, AD and Cognition.
    Date: September 14, 2006.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Alicja L. Markowska, PhD, DSC, Scientific Review 
Office, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, 
7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892. 301-496-
9666. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0a676b7861657d796b4a64636b24646362246d657c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ec818d9e87839b9f8dac82858dc2828584c28b839a">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 25, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-7335 Filed 8-30-06; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5108 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5108

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
            To extend the Export Administration Act of 1979.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 20 of the 
Export Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 2419) is amended by 
striking ``August 20, 1994'' and inserting ``September 30, 1995''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 4, 1994.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.






103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5108

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

            To extend the Export Administration Act of 1979.`
§ 14.257 Are there any exceptions to the restrictions contained in the regulations in this subpart? ( a ) The prohibitions of § 14.253 do not apply to: ( 1 ) A licensed entity or registered Federal facility that meets all of the requirements of § 14.254;
( 2 ) A State college, State university, or State agency;
( 3 ) A State-licensed veterinarian;
( 4 ) A wildlife sanctuary that meets all of the requirements of § 14.256; or
( 5 ) A person who: ( i ) Can produce documentation showing that they are transporting live prohibited wildlife species solely for the purpose of expeditiously transporting the prohibited wildlife species between individuals or entities that are excepted from the prohibitions in § 14.253; and
( ii ) Has no financial interest (whether in cash or in kind) in the prohibited wildlife species other than payment received for transporting them.
( b ) The prohibition on possession in § 14.253 does not apply to a registered pre-BCPSA owner who is in possession of any prohibited wildlife species that was: ( 1 ) Born and possessed by the registered pre-BCPSA owner before the date of enactment of the BCPSA and meets all of the requirements of § 14.255 for each of the prohibited wildlife species in their possession; or
( 2 ) Bred before and born on or after the date of enactment of the BCPSA, to a prohibited wildlife species possessed by the registered pre-BCPSA owner before the date of enactment of the BCPSA, if the registered pre-BCPSA owner provides documentation demonstrating that the breeding occurred before the date of enactment of the BCPSA and meets all of the requirements of § 14.255 for each of the prohibited wildlife species in their possession.
§ 100.9 Information collection requirements. ( a ) The rules in this part contain information collection requirements subject to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval under 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520. They apply to fish and wildlife harvest activities on public lands in Alaska. Subsistence users will not be required to respond to an information collection request unless a valid OMB number is displayed on the information collection form. ( 1 ) Section 100.6, Licenses, permits, harvest tickets, tags, and reports. The information collection requirements contained in § 100.6 (Federal Subsistence Registration Permit or Federal Designated Harvester Permit forms) provide for permit-specific subsistence activities not authorized through the general adoption of State regulations. Identity and location of residence are required to determine if you are eligible for a permit and a report of success is required after a harvest attempt. These requirements are not duplicative with the requirements of paragraph (a)(3) of this section. The regulations in § 100.6 require this information before a rural Alaska resident may engage in subsistence uses on public lands. The Department estimates that the average time necessary to obtain and comply with this permit information collection requirement is 0.25 hours.
( 2 ) Section 100.20, Request for reconsideration. The information collection requirements contained in § 100.20 provide a standardized process to allow individuals the opportunity to appeal decisions of the Board. Submission of a request for reconsideration is voluntary but required to receive a final review by the Board. We estimate that a request for reconsideration will take 4 hours to prepare and submit.
( 3 ) The remaining information collection requirements contained in this part imposed upon subsistence users are those adopted from State regulations. These collection requirements would exist in the absence of Federal subsistence regulations and are not subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act. The burden in this situation is negligible, and information gained from these reports is systematically available to Federal managers by routine computer access requiring less than 1 hour.
( b ) You may direct comments on the burden estimate or any other aspect of the burden estimate to the Service's Information Collection Clearance Officer at the address provided at 50 CFR 2.1(b). Additional information requirements may be imposed if Local Advisory Committees or additional Regional Councils, subject to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), are established under subpart B of this part. Such requirements will be submitted to OMB for approval prior to their implementation.
[67 FR 30563, May 7, 2002, as amended at 79 FR 43968, July 29, 2014]
§ 16.11 Importation of live wild mammals. ( a ) The importation, transportation, or acquisition is prohibited of live specimens of: ( 1 ) Any species of so-called “flying fox” or fruit bat of the genus *Pteropus*;
( 2 ) any species of mongoose or meerkat of the genera *Atilax, Cynictis, Helogale, Herpestes, Ichneumia, Mungos,* and *Suricata*;
( 3 ) any species of European rabbit of the genus *Oryctolagus*;
( 4 ) any species of Indian wild dog, red dog, or dhole of the genus *Cuon*;
( 5 ) any species of multimammate rat or mouse of the genus *Mastomys*;
( 6 ) any raccoon dog, *Nyctereutes procyonoides*; and
( 7 ) any brushtail possum, *Trichosurus vulpecula*: Provided, that the Director shall issue permits authorizing the importation, transportation, and possession of such mammals under the terms and conditions set forth in § 16.22.
( b ) Upon the filing of a written declaration with the District Director of Customs at the port of entry as required under § 14.61, all other species of live wild mammals may be imported, transported, and possessed in captivity, without a permit, for scientific, medical, educational, exhibition, or propagating purposes, but no such live wild mammals or any progeny thereof may be released into the wild except by the State wildlife conservation agency having jurisdiction over the area of release or by persons having prior written permission for release from such agency: *Provided,* That the provisions of this paragraph shall not apply to live game mammals from Mexico, the importation of which is governed by regulations under part 14 of this chapter.
[39 FR 1169, Jan. 4, 1974, as amended at 47 FR 56362, Dec. 16, 1982; 67 FR 39868, June 11, 2002]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1091

MARY F. BEARD, Widow of Boyd T. Beard,

Petitioner,

versus

UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION; DIRECTOR,

OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

(05-945-BLA; 04-6291-BLA)

Submitted: July 20, 2007 Decided: August 16, 2007

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry L. Rowe, Kelly Elswick-Hall, LARRY L. ROWE, ATTORNEYS AT LAW,

Charleston, West Virginia, for Petitioner. Howard G. Salisbury,

Jr., KAY CASTO & CHANEY PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for

Respondent United States Steel.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Mary F. Beard, widow of Boyd T. Beard, seeks review of

the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the

administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant

to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2000). Our review of the record discloses

that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is

without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the Board. Beard v. U.S. Steel Corp., Nos. 05-945-BLA;

04-6291-BLA (BRB Aug. 14, 2006). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5003 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5003

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow certain expenses 
for overnight camps to qualify for the credit and exclusion relating to 
                        dependent care expenses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 19, 1994

 Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow certain expenses 
for overnight camps to qualify for the credit and exclusion relating to 
                        dependent care expenses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN EXPENSES FOR OVERNIGHT CAMPS TO QUALIFY FOR 
              DEPENDENT CARE-RELATED BENEFITS.

    (a) Credit.--The last sentence of subparagraph (A) of section 
21(b)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to expenses for 
household and dependent care services necessary for gainful employment) 
is amended by inserting before the period ``to the extent the amount 
paid for such services for any week does not exceed $46.15''.
    (b) Exclusion.--Paragraph (1) of section 129(e) of such Code 
(relating to dependent care assistance programs) is amended by 
inserting before the period ``, determined by substituting `$96.15' for 
`$46.15' in the last sentence of subparagraph (A) thereof''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to services provided after December 31, 1993.
                                 <all>
```
§ 18.143 Specified geographic region where this subpart applies. ( a ) The specified geographic region encompasses areas within 2 kilometers (km) (∼1.25 miles (mi)) of eight USCG facilities within the USCG Civil Engineering Unit, Juneau Area of Responsibility. These facilities are: Base Kodiak, Moorings Seward, Moorings Valdez, Moorings Cordova, Moorings Sitka, Station Juneau, Moorings Petersburg, and Base Ketchikan.
( b ) The geographic area of the incidental take regulations (ITRs) in this subpart includes all Alaska State waters within the areas listed in paragraph (a) of this section as well as all adjacent rivers, estuaries, and coastal lands where sea otters may occur.