alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION








By
signing below, each of the undersigned officers hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted


pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his or her knowledge,
(i) this report fully


complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and (ii) the


information
contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results


of
operations of Indiana Community Bancorp.





Signed
this 12th
day of March 2010.











/s/ Mark T.
Gorski                                                                                /s/John K. Keach,
Jr.


(Signature of Authorized
Officer)                                                     (Signature
of Authorized Officer)





Mark T.
Gorski                                                                                      John K. Keach,
Jr.


(Typed
Name)                                                                                      (Typed
Name)





Chief Financial
Officer                                                                        President and Chief
Executive Officer


(Title)                                                                                    
              
(Title)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
and is being retained by INDIANA COMMUNITY BANCORP and will be forwarded to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
----

----

I Acts whose publication is obligatory

----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1089/2005

of 11 July 2005         

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of 21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 12 July 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 July 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1947/2002 (OJ L 299, 1.11.2002, p. 17).

----

ANNEX

to Commission Regulation of 11 July 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

----

(1)  Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 750/2005 (OJ L 126, 19.5.2005, p. 12). Code ‘            999            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

----

Corrigenda

----

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 991/2005 of 28 June 2005 establishing unit values for the determination of the customs value of certain perishable goods

(Official Journal of the European Union L 168 of 30 June 2005)

On page 12, in the annex, in the third column of the last entry ‘2.30’, under the heading EUR:

for:

               ‘62,26’            

read:

               ‘65,26’.

----
#### §§ 95.993-95.1699 [Reserved]
#### § 90.804 Aggregation of 900 MHz SMR licenses.

The Commission will license each 10-channel block in the 900 MHz SMR spectrum separately. Applicants may aggregate across spectrum blocks within the limitation specified in § 20.6(b) of this chapter.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-40290

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CHRISTOPHER DARNELL STEPHNEY, 

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. G-98-CR-19-1

--------------------

October 20, 1999

Before JONES, WIENER, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Christopher Darnell Stephney appeals his sentence following

his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm under

18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Stephney argues that he should not have

been sentenced under the guideline applicable to aggravated

assault. Guidelines § 2K2.1 prescribes the penalties for

violations of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). That guideline directs

that, if the defendant used or possessed the firearm in
No. 99-40290

-2-

connection with the commission or attempted commission of another

offense, the guideline applicable to that other offense is to be

used. U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(c)(1)(A). The probation officer

recommended and the district court adopted the use of § 2A2.2,

which is captioned, "Aggravated Assault." The application note

to § 2A2.2 defines aggravated assault as "a felonious assault

that involved (A) a dangerous weapon with intent to do bodily

harm (i.e., not merely to frighten)...." U.S.S.G. § 2A2.2,

comment. (n.1). This court has found that the aggravated assault

of § 2A2.2 is "akin to the federal offense of assault with a

dangerous weapon with intent to do bodily harm." United States

v. Perez, 897 F.2d 751, 753 (5th Cir. 1990). The actor must be

judged not by his undisclosed purpose to frighten, but from his

visible conduct and "what one in the position of the victim might

reasonably conclude." Id. 

The facts in the presentence report (PSR) adopted by the

district court are that Stephney put five shots through the front

door of the residence of an individual that he had been in a

physical altercation earlier in the day and had threatened to

shoot because that individual was homosexual. See United States

v. Lowder, 148 F.3d 548, 552 (5th Cir. 1998); United States v.

Puig-Infante, 19 F.3d 929, 943 (5th Cir. 1994). Stephney offered

no evidence at the sentencing hearing to rebut the findings in

the PSR. A victim would be reasonable in concluding that

someone, who had threatened to shoot him earlier in the day and

who then put five shots into his front door, intended to do him
No. 99-40290

-3-

bodily harm. The determination that Stephney committed an

aggravated assault is not clearly erroneous. 

AFFIRMED.
An official website of the United States government "Here is how you know"


Official websites use.gov  .gov
 Secure .gov websites use HTTPS 
	A lock https:


Menu
        ABOUTDirector's Corner
Contact COPS
Community Policing in Action: Photo Contest
The L. Anthony Sutin Award for Innovative Law Enforcement and Community Partnerships
Photo Galleries
Subscribe
NEWSPress Releases
Executive Order on Advancing Effective, Accountable Policing and Criminal Justice Practices to Enhance Public Trust and Public Safety
GRANTSSolicitation Finder
Funding Opportunities
How To Apply
Grants Deadlines and Announcement Dates
Compliance and Reporting
Program Documents
Grantee Success Stories
Award Announcement Map
RESOURCESCritical Incident Review: Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, TX
National Blue Alert Network
Resource Center/Publications
E-Newsletter: Community Policing Dispatch
Podcast Series: The Beat
Video Series: What’s New in Blue
Tribal Community Policing Resources
Community Policing Topics
Community Violence Intervention
Addressing Human TraffickingLabor Trafficking
Recruitment, Hiring & Retention
Filing a Civil Rights Complaint
TRAINING & TECHNICAL ASSISTANCECollaborative Reform InitiativeCRI-TAC
Critical Response
Organizational Assessments
COPS Training Portal
Training
ACCOUNT ACCESS
 Search form
    Search






COPS Anti-Methamphetamine Program (CAMP) Awards                                                  AWARD ANNOUNCEMENT DOCUMENTS

Award List

Award Owner's Manual

CAMP Post-Award Fact Sheet

CAMP Methodology

AWARD MANAGEMENT DOCUMENTS

Background Investigation FAQs
	SF-425 Fact Sheet
	SF-425 Helpful Hints

Tips for Financial Managers to complete FFRs
	Consultant Contractor Fact Sheet
	Sole Source Justification Fact Sheet

***For additional assistance, we encourage you to visit the Award Management Materials Page, where you will find frequently asked questions, additional fact sheets, links to webinars, and other resources.***


SPOTLIGHT


SUBSCRIBE TO EMAIL UPDATES
 
 SUBSCRIBE TO CP DISPATCH


ABOUT Contact COPS
	Community Policing in Action: Photo Contest
	The L. Anthony Sutin Award for Innovative Law Enforcement and Community Partnerships
	Photo Galleries
	Subscribe NEWS Press Releases
	Executive Order on Safe Policing for Safer Communities
 GRANTS Compliance & Reporting
	Program Documents
	Grantees
	Grantee Success Stories
	Agency Portal Video Tutorials
	Award Announcement Map RESOURCES National Blue Alert Network
	Recent Releases
	Resource Center/Publications
	E-Newsletter: Community Policing Dispatch
	Podcast Series: The Beat
	Video Series: What’s New in Blue
	Tribal Community Policing Resources
	Addressing Human Trafficking
	Community Policing Topics
	Recruitment, Hiring & Retention
 TRAINING & TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Collaborative Reform Initiative for Technical Assistance Center
	COPS Training Portal
	Training ACCOUNT ACCESS ACCESSIBILITY INFORMATION


FOIA Language Access Plan Legal Policies and Disclaimers No Fear Act Open Government Plain Writing Privacy Policy USA.gov Whistleblower Protection Social Media Department of Justice Accessibility
### FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Inthe Matter ofDiamond Air 

### Charter, Inc. FAA DocketNo. CP10EA0004 DMS No. FAA-2010-0620 Judge Sullivan AGENCY'S WITHDRAWAL OF COMPLAINT The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), by counsel, and, pursuant to 14 CFR 13.215, hereby withdraws its Complaint in this matter.

Respectfullysubmitted, Alfred R. 

### Joly;tson, Jr. 

### Regional Counsel By:

# ~ A

# ~~\,__ Zacharikaan Attorney Federal Aviation Administration 1Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434

. 718 553-3258

718 995-5699CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that the foregoing Agency's Withdrawal of Complaint has been sent via first class mail and e-mail to the following: Gregory S. Winton Aviation Law Experts , LLC One Research Court, Suite 450 Rockville, MD 20850 Email: Greg@AviationLawExperts.Com

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Judge U.S. Department ofTransportation Office ofHearings, M-20 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 Washington, DC 20590 Email: Diane.Mays@DOT.GOV
I hereby certify that the foregoing Agency's Withdrawal of Complaint has been sent via first class mail to the following: Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 WilburWright Building, Suite 2W1000 Federal AviationAdministration 

# J 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Room924A Washington, D.C. 20591

Date: 

### JUL 2 5 2012

# V~ks~t~ Paralegal Specialist Federal AviationAdministration Office ofRegional Counsel 1 Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434

2
S i l v i c u l t u r e Best Management Practices 9 

# Figure 1 (cont.)10 S i l v i c u l t u r e Best Management Practices Intermittent streams are those that have a well defined channel but maintain only seasonal flow under typical climatic conditions. This includes natural streams that have been altered by dredging and/or straightening (see Canal Section). For all intermittent streams, the Stringer is required. The total SMZ for intermittent streams consists of the Stringer, which occupies the immediate stream bank, and the Secondary Zone. The Secondary Zone, like the Primary Zone, is measured from the stream, beginning at the break in slope at the top of the stream bank, out to the designated width. In addition, where the stream is connected to the inflow and/or discharge point of a flowing wetland, the Zone extends an additional 50 feet beyond the defined channel into the wetland (Figure 4).

All intermittent waterbodies are afforded a Stringer and a Secondary Zone of at least 35 feet, regardless of the SSC. However, depending on the SSC, an intermittent stream could have a Secondary Zone as wide as 300 feet (Appendix 1). Figure 2 shows examples of Secondary Zones on several different intermittent streams, each with a different SSC. Note that the total SMZ is composed of the Stringer and the Secondary Zone - no Primary Zone applies to

intermittent streams. 

# Application of SMZs: Intermittent Streams
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,981
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,088
<ALLOWANCES>                                       774
<INVENTORY>                                      6,390
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,435
<PP&E>                                          50,252
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,984
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,866
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,983
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            51
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,013
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,866
<SALES>                                         71,338
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                71,338
<CGS>                                           55,888
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,888
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (19)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     3
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,469
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,451
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,018
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,018
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .47


</TABLE>
- la 1978
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P243Practice Brief: Call-in Preparation and ExecutionThe National Network for Safe Communities' Group Violence Reduction Strategy (GVRS), also known as Operation Ceasefire, has repeatedly demonstrated that serious violence can be dramatically reduced when law enforcement, community members, and social services providers join together to directly engage with violent street groups to clearly communicate (1) a law enforcement message that future violence will be met with clear and predictable consequences, (2) a community moral message that violence will no longer be tolerated, and (3) a genuine offer of help to those who want it. The strategy's central tool to communicate these messages is a call in, a face to face meeting between GVRS representatives and street group members. Practice Brief: Call-In Preparation and Execution is intended to help law enforcement, community, and social services partners already engaged in implementing GVRS to design, prepare, and execute their first and subsequent call-ins.By Vaughn Crandell, Sue-Lin WongCategories: Community Partnerships • Violent CrimeLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p243Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFBook • Aug 2012Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 00:41 (UTC-5) in 0.20 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
Case 16-27198 Doc 4 Filed 08/24/16 Entered 08/24/16 14:02:06 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-27198 Doc 4 Filed 08/24/16 Entered 08/24/16 14:02:06 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
#### § 76.906 Presumption of effective competition.

In the absence of a demonstration to the contrary cable systems are presumed: (a) To be subject to effective competition pursuant to section 76.905(b)(2); and (b) Not to be subject to effective competition pursuant to section 76.905(b)(1), (3) or (4).

[80 FR 38012, July 2, 2015]
Artificial Intelligence Use Case Inventory

Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives

Use case ID USHouse-Clerk-1

Use case name Comparative Print Suite

Agency U.S. House of Representatives

Bureau/Department Office of the Clerk, Legislative Computer Systems

Summary of use case The Comparative Print Suite is a set of applications 

that produces comparative prints showing how 

proposed legislation may amend law using natural 

language processing, which identifies amendments 

in proposed legislative documents, retrieves 

provisions of the impacted law from a current law 

data set, and executes the proposed amendments in 

the appropriate place in the law.

Stage of system development life cycle Operation and maintenance

Date initiated, if applicable 1/3/2017

Date when development and/or 

acquisition began, if applicable

4/13/2017

Date implemented, if applicable 6/8/2020

Contact name Kirsten Gullickson, product owner

Developer information Contracted

Consistent with EO 13960? Yes

Explanation for inconsistencies with 

EO 13960

N/A

What specific AI techniques were 

used?

Natural language processing, machine learning

Where did/does the training data 

originate?

Agency generated

Does the agency have access to the 

code associated with the AI use case?

Yes

If the source code is publicly available, 

provide link.

No

Is the agency able to conduct ongoing 

testing on the code?

Yes

Is the agency able to monitor and/or 

audit performance?

Yes
Case 16-22559 Doc 4 Filed 07/14/16 Entered 07/14/16 11:29:38 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-22559 Doc 4 Filed 07/14/16 Entered 07/14/16 11:29:38 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
## Swanson, Brian (OST)**-~,-From:** 

# ,,**s~h't~(** 

# · To; 

### Subject: Heidmann, Randy <Randy.Heidmann@wolterskluwer.com>. Monday, August 13, 2012 10:22 AM Swanson, Brian (OST) Brainerd,MN Airport Service and SkyWest 

# ·2: I0

I am a frequent flying out of Brainerd,MN airport and Ifully support the choice ofour local Airport Commission to accept the bid of SkyWest Airlines. I also hope that DOT will also support this local decision as well. Thank you in advance.
Randy

### J. Heidmann IRA/HSA Consultant Wolters Kluwer Financial Services 800·397-2341 Ext. 1105571 randy.heidmann @wolterskluwer.com



# ...

1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         169,487
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  510,049
<ALLOWANCES>                                   124,481
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               580,359
<PP&E>                                         126,138
<DEPRECIATION>                                  73,155
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,330,585
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,249,420
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           57,769
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,531,278
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,330,585
<SALES>                                      2,964,430
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,964,430
<CGS>                                        1,454,145
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,454,145
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              42,293
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                233,224
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            233,224
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   233,224
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04


</TABLE>
#### §§ 95.535-95.559 [Reserved]
#### § 95.2507 MBAN devices restricted to indoor operation within a health care facility.

Use of Medical Body Area Network (MBAN) devices in the 2360-2390 MHz band is restricted to indoor operation within a health care facility registered with the MBAN frequency coordinator under § 95.2509. For the purposes of this subpart, health care facilities are limited to hospitals and other establishments, both Federal and non-Federal, that offer services, facilities and beds for use beyond a 24 hour period in rendering medical treatment.