Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 169 / Thursday, August 31, 2006 / Notices 51849 

line from the existing Imperial Valley 

Substation near the community of El 

Centro, to a new ‘‘Central’’ substation to 

be located somewhere in central San 

Diego County. SDG&E also proposes to 

build two new 230 kV lines connecting 

the Central substation to the existing 

Sycamore Canyon substation and one 

new 230 kV line between the Sycamore 

Canyon substation and the existing 

Pe±asquitos Substation. The total length 

of the Project is estimated to be 

approximately 130 to 150 miles, of 

which roughly 40 to 60 miles would be 

located in Imperial County. The 

proposed 500 kV line transmission line 

would be constructed in part on BLM 

administered lands within the 

California Desert Conservation Area, as 

managed by the El Centro Field Office, 

and within San Diego County, as 

managed by the Palm Springs/South 

Coast Field Office. The remainder of the 

line would cross lands in various 

ownership, including private, State, and 

local agencies. 

The proposed transmission line(s) 

will utilize 120–170 foot tall structures, 

spaced approximately 700–1,600 feet 

apart. It would occupy a right-of-way of 

approximately 200–300 feet in width. 

Existing disturbed corridors would be 

utilized to the extent feasible, to 

minimize potential environmental 

impacts. Where possible, SDG&E 

anticipates locating new facilities 

within or along existing rights-of-way. 

The 500 kV transmission line would 

traverse approximately 30 to 35 miles of 

BLM administered lands in Imperial 

County, and approximately one mile in 

San Diego County. A plan amendment 

to the CDCA Plan (1980) will be 

required because the Project would 

deviate from BLM designated utility 

corridors within the California Desert 

Conservation Area (Imperial County). 

Through public scoping, BLM expects 

to identify various issues, potential 

impacts and mitigation measures, and 

alternatives to the proposed action. At 

present, BLM has identified a 

preliminary list of issues that will need 

to be addressed in this analysis, 

including the impacts of the proposed 

project on visual resources, agricultural 

lands, air quality, plant and animal 

species including special status species, 

cultural resources, and watersheds. 

Other issues identified by BLM are 

impacts to the public in the form of 

noise, traffic, accidental release of 

hazardous materials, and impacts to 

urban, residential, and recreational 

areas. Members of the public are invited 

to identify additional issues and 

concerns to be addressed. 

BLM will analyze the proposed action 

and no action alternatives, as well as 

other possible alternatives to the project. 

Your comments concerning the 

proposed project and feasible alternative 

locations, possible mitigation measures, 

and any other information relevant to 

the proposed action are encouraged. 

Additional informational meetings may 

be conducted throughout the process to 

keep the public informed of the progress 

of the EIS/EIR. 

Dated: July 20, 2006. 

J. Anthony Danna, 

Deputy State Director, Natural Resources 

(CA–930). 

[FR Doc. E6–14502 Filed 8–30–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–40–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

National Park Service 

Notice of Intent To Repatriate Cultural 

Items: Thomas Burke Memorial 

Washington State Museum, University 

of Washington, Seattle, WA; Correction 

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. 

ACTION: Notice; correction. 

Notice is here given in accordance 

with the Native American Graves 

Protection and Repatriation Act 

(NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 3003, of the intent 

to repatriate cultural items in the 

possession of the Thomas Burke 

Memorial Washington State Museum 

(Burke Museum), University of 

Washington, Seattle, WA, that meet the 

definition of ‘‘unassociated funerary 

objects’’ under 25 U.S.C. 3001. 

This notice is published as part of the 

National Park Service’s administrative 

responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25 

U.S.C. 3003(d)(3). The determinations in 

this notice are the sole responsibility of 

the museum, institution, or Federal 

agency that has control of the cultural 

items. The National Park Service is not 

responsible for the determinations in 

this notice. 

This notice replaces a Notice of Intent 

To Repatriate Cultural Items previously 

published in the Federal Register on 

December 28, 2005, (FR Doc. 05–24509, 

pages 76865–76866). This notice 

replacement is necessary, as 

reevaluation of the collection has 

resulted in a change in the number and 

description of the cultural items. 

The 13 cultural items are 7 partial 

beaded necklaces (beads include glass 

trade beads, shell beads, and copper 

beads), 1 bracelet fragment, 3 sets of 

beads (1 of which includes 8 small bone 

fragments), 1 piece of twine, and 1 

petrified twig. 

At an unknown date, the 13 cultural 

items were removed from a small island 

just upriver from Blalock Island in the 

lower Columbia River, Benton County, 

WA, by Mr. John Tomaske, an 

archeology graduate student of the 

University of Washington. In 1960, the 

cultural items were donated to the 

University of Washington Department of 

Anthropology, and subsequently 

transferred to the Burke Museum and 

accessioned in 1973 (Burke Accn. 1973–

8). Accession information indicated the 

presence of burials at the site. 

According to Mr. Tomaske, the burials 

had previously been disturbed and 

exhibited evidence of cremation. The 

human remains are not in the 

possession of the Burke Museum. 

The small island just upriver from 

Blalock Island described in museum 

records could be Cook’s Island, which 

was formerly recorded as containing 

cremation burials. Archaeological 

evidence for Cook’s Island supports the 

presence of cremation burials. 

Cremation and burial on islands in the 

Columbia River were customary 

practices of the Umatilla. It was also the 

practice of the Umatilla that individuals 

were buried with many of their personal 

belongings. The area surrounding 

Blalock Island was heavily utilized by 

the Umatilla, including ama’amapa, 

which served as a habitation area, burial 

site, and stronghold from enemies. On 

Blalock Island, and along the 

Washington side of the Columbia River, 

the Umatilla had a permanent camp, 

Yep-po-luc-sha (or Yep-po-kuc-sha), as 

well as a fishing area. 

Burial practices and funerary objects 

described are consistent with historic 

practices of the present-day 

Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla 

Reservation, Oregon. The area 

surrounding Blalock Island is within the 

aboriginal territory of the Confederated 

Tribes of the Umatilla Reservation, 

Oregon and the land claims boundaries 

of the Indian Claims Commission 

decision of 1960. 

Officials of the Burke Museum have 

determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 

3001(3)(B), the 13 cultural items 

described above are reasonably believed 

to have been placed with or near 

individual human remains at the time of 

death or later as part of the death rite 

or ceremony and are believed, by a 

preponderance of the evidence, to have 

been removed from a specific burial site 

of a Native American individual. 

Officials of the Burke Museum also have 

determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 

3001(2), there is a relationship of shared 

group identity that can be reasonably 

traced between funerary objects and the 

Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla 

Reservation, Oregon. 


erjones on PROD1PC72 with NOTICES
51850 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 169 / Thursday, August 31, 2006 / Notices 

1The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 

2Commissioner Deanna Tanner Okun not 

participating. 

3Chairman Daniel R. Pearson dissenting. 

4Commissioner Charlotte R. Lane dissenting. 

5Commissioners Stephen Koplan and Charlotte 

R. Lane dissenting. 

6The schedule of the Commission’s reviews and 

of the public hearing was revised on December 9, 

2005 (70 FR 75482, December 20, 2005) and on May 

4, 2006 (71 FR 27513, May 11, 2006). 

Representatives of any other Indian 

tribe that believes itself to be culturally 

affiliated with the unassociated funerary 

objects should contact Dr. Peter Lape, 

Burke Museum, University of 

Washington, Box 353010, Seattle, WA 

98195–3010, telephone (206) 685–2282, 

October 2, 2006. Repatriation of the 

unassociated funerary objects to the 

Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla 

Reservation, Oregon may proceed after 

that date if no additional claimants 

come forward. 

The Burke Museum is responsible for 

notifying the Confederated Tribes of the 

Umatilla Reservation, Oregon that this 

notice has been published. 

Dated: August 14, 2006. 

Sherry Hutt, 

Manager, National NAGPRA Program. 

[FR Doc. 06–7278 Filed 8–30–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–50–M 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–344, 391–A, 

392–A and C, 393–A, 394–A, 396, and 399–

A (Second Review)] 

Certain Bearings From China, France, 

Germany, Italy, Japan, Singapore, and 

the United Kingdom 

Determinations 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject five-year reviews, the 

United States International Trade 

Commission (Commission) determines,2

pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the 

Act), that revocation of the antidumping 

duty orders on the following types of 

bearings from China, France, Germany, 

Japan, and the United Kingdom would 

be likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of material injury to an 

industry in the United States within a 

reasonably foreseeable time. 

Product Country Investigation No. 

Tapered roller bearings ........................................................................................... China 3 .................................................... 731–TA–344 

Ball bearings ............................................................................................................ France .................................................... 731–TA–392–A 

Ball bearings ............................................................................................................ Germany ................................................ 731–TA–391–A 

Ball bearings ............................................................................................................ Italy ......................................................... 731–TA–393–A 

Ball bearings ............................................................................................................ Japan ..................................................... 731–TA–394–A 

Ball bearings ............................................................................................................ United Kingdom ..................................... 731–TA–399–A 

The Commission also determines that 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

orders on the following types of 

bearings from France and Singapore 

would not be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of material 

injury to an industry in the United 

States within a reasonably foreseeable 

time. 

Product Country Investigation No. 

Ball bearings ............................................................................................................ Singapore 4 ............................................. 731–TA–396 

Spherical plain bearings .......................................................................................... France 5 .................................................. 731–TA–392–C 

Background 

The Commission instituted these 

reviews on June 1, 2005 (70 FR 31531) 

and determined on September 7, 2005 

that it would conduct full reviews (70 

FR 54568, September 15, 2005). Notice 

of the scheduling of the Commission’s 

reviews and of a public hearing to be 

held in connection therewith was given 

by posting copies of the notice in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 

Washington, DC, and by publishing the 

notice in the Federal Register on 

October 18, 2005 (70 FR 60556).6 The 

hearing was held in Washington, DC, on 

May 2, 2006, and all persons who 

requested the opportunity were 

permitted to appear in person or by 

counsel. 

The Commission transmitted its 

determination in this review to the 

Secretary of Commerce on August 25, 

2006. The views of the Commission are 

contained in USITC Publication 3876 

(August 2006), entitled Certain Bearings 

from China, France, Germany, Italy, 

Japan, Singapore, and the United 

Kingdom: Investigation Nos. 731–TA–

344, 391–A, 392–A and C, 393–A, 394–

A, and 399–A (Second Review). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: August 28, 2006. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 06–7350 Filed 8–30–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent 

Decree 

In accordance with Departmental 

Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby 

given that a proposed Consent Decree in 

United States v. Howard McKenzie & 

EBT Property Holding Co., Inc., No. 

2:06–CV–02353, was lodged with the 

United States District Court for the 

District of South Carolina on August 23, 

2006. 

The proposed Consent Decree 

concerns a compliant filed by the 

United States against Howard McKenzie 

& EBT Property Holding Co., Inc., 

pursuant to sections 301 and 404 of the 

Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1311 and 

1344, with respect to Defendants’

alleged violations of the Clean Air Act 

by discharging pollutants into waters of 


erjones on PROD1PC72 with NOTICES