alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
N. Y. SUPERIOR COURT.

#### Margaret Irvine agt. Amasa Spring and others.

No *clerk*of an attorney at law, however extensive his general powers may he, can *discontinue an action*without the consent of his principal.

*Special*Term, May, 1865.

*Before Justice*McCunn.

Motion by plaintiff to set aside an order entered for the discontinuance of this action.

Mr. Cutler, *for the motion.*

Mr. Niles, *opposed.*

Mc Cunn, J.

In this case it appears that a trial was had at circuit, on the 9th *of*November last, before a jury, and the plaintiff recovered a verdict of $400; that before judgment was perfected, or costs taxed, Mr. Niles, the defendants’ attor*480ney, approached a person by the name of Walsh, who had at times acted as clerk in the office of plaintiffs attorney, and procured from him, unknown to the plaintiff’s attorney, a consent to the effect that an order might be entered discontinuing the action on payment of $400, the amount of the verdict, saying nothing of the costs. On this consent an order was accordingly entered discontinuing the action.

It is quite clear that no clerk, however extensive his general powers may be, can discontinue an action without the consent of his principal; indeed, the courts are so jealous of the interests of the different suitors that they will only allow an attorney to give a satisfaction piece within two years after entry of judgment, and that on receiving the full amount of fhe claim.

The person claiming to be the clerk of plaintiff’s attorney, and who consented to the entry of the order of discontinuance, makes two affidavits on this motion, one for the plaintiff and one for the defendant; and as there was some slight contradiction in the affidavits, I ordered the appearance - of Walsh in court and examined him, and then I learned that Mr. Niles handed $55 to Walsh individually, in consideration that he, Walsh, should receive the certified check of $400 for Mr. Cutler, and sign the consent to enter the order of discontinuance.

Under such a state of facts, I deem it my duty not only to set aside the order of the 20th of December unconditionally, but to deny the defendants’ attorney’s request for time to make a case.

Motion granted, with $10 costs. •
§ 73.5009 Assignment or transfer of control. ( a ) The unjust enrichment provisions found at § 1.2111(b) through (e) of this chapter shall not apply to applicants seeking approval of a transfer of control or assignment of a broadcast construction permit or license within three years of receiving such permit or license by means of competitive bidding.
( b ) The ownership disclosure requirements found at § 1.2112(a) of this chapter shall not apply to an applicant seeking consent to assign or transfer control of a broadcast construction permit or license awarded by competitive bidding.
[67 FR 45375, July 9, 2002, as amended at 68 FR 43000, July 21, 2003]
Anderson Associates, LLP

                          Certified Public Accountants
                                7621 Fitch Lane
                           Baltimore, Maryland 21236
                                  410-882-8050



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




         As independent  auditors, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report, dated November 7, 2001,  incorporated by reference in this annual report
of WHG Bancshares Corporation on Form 10-KSB, into the Corporation's  previously
filed Form S-8 Registration Statement File Nos. 333-34659 and 333-54974.




                                            /s/Anderson Associates, LLP
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Anderson Associates, LLP
Baltimore, Maryland
December 21, 2001
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

 Request for public comments.

# SUMMARY:

The FAA is requesting public comment on the City of Manchester, New Hampshire's request to change a portion (1 acre) of Airport property from aeronautical use to non-aeronautical use. The property is located off Harvey Road and Planeview Drive, Londonderry, New Hampshire, Identified as Tax Map 14/Lot17-2 and is currently vacant. Upon disposition is the property will be used for industrial development. The property was acquired under FAAP Project No. 9-27-018-C605.

                        The disposition of proceeds from the disposal of airport property will be in accordance with FAA's Policy and Procedures Concerning the Use of Airport Revenue, published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on February 16, 1999.                    

# DATES:

Comments must be received on or before February 27, 2006.

# ADDRESSES:

Documents are available for review by appointment by contacting Mr. David Bush, Assistant Airport Director, Manchester Airport, One Airport Road, Manchester, New Hampshire, Telephone 603-624-6539 or by contacting Donna R. Witte, Federal Aviation Administration, 16 New England Executive Park, Burlington, Massachusetts, Telephone 781-238-7624.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Donna R. Witte at the Federal Aviation Administration, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, Massachusetts 01803, Telephone 781-238-7624.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Section 125 of The Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR 21) requires the FAA to provide an opportunity for pubic notice and comment to the “waiver” or “modification” of a sponsor's Federal obligation to use certain airport property for aeronautical purposes.

Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts on January 12, 2006.

LaVerne F. Reid,

Manager, Airports Division, New England Region.

[FR Doc. 06-724  Filed 1-25-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
exv10w17w1



 





Exhibit 10.17.1




RENEWAL TERM PROMISSORY NOTE B




			
	$5,000,000.00
	 	Dated: January 03, 2007






     For value received, Enpath Medical, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (the “Borrower”) promises to
pay to the order of M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank (the “Bank”), at its offices in Minneapolis,
Minnesota, in lawful money of the United States of America, the principal amount of Five Million
and no/100 Dollars ($5,000,000.00), or if less, the aggregate unpaid principal amount of Term Note
B Advances made by the Bank to the Borrower pursuant to the Loan Agreement (as defined below);
together with interest on any and all principal amounts remaining unpaid hereon from the date of
this Note until such principal amounts are fully paid at a fluctuating annual rate equal to 2.50%
above LIBOR (as defined in the Loan Agreement). Each change in the fluctuating interest rate shall
take effect simultaneously with the corresponding change in LIBOR



     The Borrower shall pay principal in 84 monthly installments payable on the last day of each
month starting on April 30, 2007 and continuing on the last day of each month thereafter until
March 31, 2014 when all remaining principal and accrued interest shall be due and payable in full.
The monthly installment shall be equal to 1/84th of the principal balance of this Note
on March 31, 2007. The Borrower shall pay accrued interest on this Note on the last day of each
month starting on December 31, 2006 and at maturity.



 









 





     This Note is Term Note B referred to in, and is entitled to the benefits of, the Revolving
Credit and Term Loan Agreement dated as of October 17, 2003, as amended (the “Loan Agreement”)
between the Borrower (under its former name of MedAmicus, Inc.) and the Bank,
which Loan Agreement, among other things, contains provisions for the acceleration of the
maturity of this Note upon the happening of certain stated events, for an increase to the interest
rate upon the happening of certain stated events, and for prepayments of the principal amount due
under this Note upon stated terms and conditions.



     This Note is a renewal and replacement of a $4,000,000.00 promissory note dated as of August
22, 2006 from the Borrower to the Bank which prior note remains unpaid but the principal balance of
which has been incorporated into this Note.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Enpath Medical, Inc.
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	  Its	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 






2
# South Coast

Air Quality Management District 21865 CopleyDrive, DiamondBar, CA 91765-4178 (909)396-2000

. www.aqmd.gov June 22, 2006 Ms. Sally Rump Air Pollution Specialist Stationary

Source Division Air Resources

Board 1 001 I Street P.O. Box 2815 Sacramento,

CA 95812
Re SIP Submittal: Rule 1127 Dear Ms. Rump: Attached you will find infonnation pertaining to Rule 1127 which was adopted by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) Governing Board on August 6, 2004. Because this rule is an economicincentivetype rule or replaces emissionlimits, the U.S. Environmental

ProtectionAgency (EP

A) has requested

that we submit it for inclusion in the StateImplementation Plan (SIP). Weare requesting

that upon your review and conCUlTence the attached

information be providedto EP

A for its review and inclusion in the SIP. Tracy Goss, Program If you have any questions on this submittal, please contact Supervisor,

PM Strategies

at (909) 396-3106.

Sincerely, 

# ~~~~/ Deputy ExecutiveOfficer Planning,Rule Development & Area Sources LL/TG Attachments: SIP Completeness

Checklist Cleancopy of adopted

rule Proof of Publication Signed Board Resolution/Minutes APCD/ AQMD Rule EvaluationFonn Staff Report(includespublic comments & responses) Andrew SteckellEPA Region LX (w/o attachments) Mary Leonard/SCAQMD (w/o attachments) Henry Hogo/SCAQMD (w/o attachments) Laki Tisopulos/SCAQMD (w/o attachments) SIP File (w/attachrnents)
# National Ovarian Cancer Awareness Month, 2006

National Ovarian Cancer Awareness Month provides an opportunity to raise awareness of risk factors, prevention, and treatment of this deadly disease. Our Nation is committed to fighting ovarian cancer, finding its cure, and providing hope and healing to those who are affected by it. 

While ovarian cancer remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related death among women in our country, scientists have made significant progress in understanding the factors associated with it. Women of all ages can develop this cancer, but studies have shown risk increases with age. Other factors associated with ovarian cancer include family history, obesity, use of fertility drugs, and a prior occurrence of certain cancers. Because the chances of surviving ovarian cancer are higher when it is diagnosed and treated in its early stages, women should talk to their doctors about risk factors and screenings for this disease. 

America leads the world in medical research, and we are committed to continuing progress in research for prevention, better treatments, and a cure for ovarian cancer. This year, the National Institutes of Health will invest an estimated $106 million in ovarian cancer research, and the National Cancer Institute is sponsoring clinical trials to explore new ways to improve ovarian cancer treatment. The Department of Defense will also dedicate an estimated $10 million for its Ovarian Cancer Research Program, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) will invest an estimated $5 million to ovarian cancer research. The CDC is additionally partnering with private organizations to sponsor ovarian cancer survivor courses for patients, as well as their friends and loved ones, following successful cancer treatment. 

During National Ovarian Cancer Awareness Month, we honor the victims and survivors of this disease for their courage, hope, and perseverance, and we thank the families and friends who provide these individuals with comfort and care. Our Nation is grateful to medical professionals, researchers, and all those whose tireless efforts are making a positive difference in the lives of countless women in our country. By working together, we can continue to fight ovarian cancer and help more of our citizens defeat this devastating disease. 

                        NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim September 2006 as National Ovarian Cancer Awareness Month. I call upon government officials, businesses, communities, health care professionals, educators, volunteers, and the people of the United States to continue our Nation's strong commitment to preventing and treating ovarian cancer.                               ( print page 52282)    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-ninth day of August, in the year of our Lord two thousand six, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first. 

[FR Doc. 06-7431

Billing code 3195-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.2: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of China Water Group, Inc. (the “Registrant”) certifies that:




1.           The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and




2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Date:  November 23, 2011
/s/ Ding RencaiDing Rencai, Chief Financial Officer
No. 11-813.

#### Thomas *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### STONE & WEBSTER, Incorporated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rea Forhan PEDRICK, as Administratrix of the Estate of William J. Pedrick, Deceased, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 180, Docket 21920.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Feb. 15, 1951.

Decided March 5, 1951.

Joseph B. Lynch, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant.

Irving H. Saypol, U. S. Atty., New York City, Henry L. Glenn, Asst. U. S. Atty., New York City, of counsel, for defendant-appellee.

Before AUGUSTUS N. HAND, CHASE and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on . authority of Reynolds Spring Co. v. Commissioner, 6 Cir., 181 F.2d 638.
§ 32.7220 Operating Federal income taxes. ( a ) This account shall be charged and Account 4070, Income Taxes-Accrued, shall be credited for the amount of Federal Income Taxes for the current period. This account shall also reflect subsequent adjustments to amounts previously charged.
( b ) Taxes should be accrued each month on an estimated basis and adjustments made as later data becomes available.
( c ) Tax credits, other than investment tax credits, if normalized, shall be recorded consistent with the accounting for investment tax credits and shall be amortized to income as directed by this Commission.
( d ) No entries shall be made to this account to reflect interperiod tax allocations.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"Patrick Chesnut","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/chesnutp\/","title":"Federal Circuit Schedules October 2023 Session for the Atlanta Area - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"0GKTkz2nSm\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/federal-circuit-schedules-october-2023-session-for-the-atlanta-area\/\">Federal Circuit Schedules October 2023 Session for the Atlanta Area<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/federal-circuit-schedules-october-2023-session-for-the-atlanta-area\/embed\/#?secret=0GKTkz2nSm\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Federal Circuit Schedules October 2023 Session for the Atlanta Area” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"0GKTkz2nSm\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is pleased to announce that it intends to sit in Atlanta, Georgia as part of its October 2023 session.\u00a0 The Federal Circuit will also concurrently hold its regular session in Washington, D.C.\u00a0 Counsel scheduled for the October 2023 session in either location will be notified by […]"}
§ 217.63 Prohibitions. ( a ) Except for takings contemplated in § 217.62 and authorized by a LOA issued under § 216.106 of this chapter and §§ 217.66 and 217.67, it shall be unlawful for any person to do any of the following in connection with the activities listed in § 217.60: ( 1 ) Violate, or fail to comply with, the terms, conditions, and requirements of this subpart or a LOA issued under § 216.106 of this chapter and § 217.66 or § 217.67;
( 2 ) Take any marine mammal species or stock not specified in this subpart or such LOAs;
( 3 ) Take any marine mammal specified in this subpart or such LOAs in any manner other than as specified; or
( 4 ) Take a marine mammal specified in this subpart or such LOAs if NMFS determines after notice and comment that the taking allowed for one or more activities under 16 U.S.C. 1371(a)(5)(A) is having or may have more than a negligible impact on the species or stocks of such marine mammal.
( b ) [Reserved]
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"19-2192: TECSEC, INC. v. ADOBE INC. [OPINION], Precedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"MHUCgeER0q\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/10-23-2020-19-2192-tecsec-inc-v-adobe-inc-opinion-19-2192-opinion-10-23-2020_1674360\/\">19-2192: TECSEC, INC. v. ADOBE INC. [OPINION], Precedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/10-23-2020-19-2192-tecsec-inc-v-adobe-inc-opinion-19-2192-opinion-10-23-2020_1674360\/embed\/#?secret=MHUCgeER0q\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“19-2192: TECSEC, INC. v. ADOBE INC. [OPINION], Precedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"MHUCgeER0q\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Opinions\/Orders posted: TECSEC, INC. v. ADOBE INC. [OPINION](pdf) Appeal Number: 19-2192 Origin: DCT Precedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON

January 18, 2012 Session

IN RE: ANGELA T., EKENE T., and EMBER T.

Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Madison County

No. 56951 William C. Cole, Chancellor by Designation

No. W2011-01588-COA-R3-PT - Filed February 23, 2012

CONCURRING IN PART AND PARTIAL DISSENT

___________________________________

HOLLY M. KIRBY, JUDGE, CONCURRING IN PART AND PARTIAL DISSENT:

I concur fully in the majority’s finding that Father abandoned his children by willful failure

to visit them. I must reluctantly dissent from the majority’s finding that Father’s child

support payments during the pivotal four-month period amounted to abandonment by willful

failure to support. The trial court viewed Father’s testimony and considered his payment

history during the four-month period, and found no willful intent to abandon. While Father

clearly had the means to pay his full child support obligation, in view of the trial court’s

finding and the evidence on his payments, I must respectfully disagree that the record shows

by clear and convincing evidence abandonment by failure to support.

Therefore, I concur in part and dissent in part.

_______________________________________

HOLLY M. KIRBY, JUDGE