alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- 
      - ** Home
      - ** About Us
      - ** Archives
      - ** Events
      - ** Publications

### Contact Us

To provide feedback on the Community Policing Dispatch, e-mail the editorial board at CPDispatch@usdoj.gov.

To obtain details on COPS Office programs, publications, and resources, contact the COPS Office Response Center at 800-421-6770 or AskCopsRC@usdoj.gov

**U.S. Department of Justice**        Office of Community Oriented Policing Services 
www.cops.usdoj.gov

            - Home
            - About Us
            - Archives
            - Events
            - Publications
            - Contact Us

### **Protecting Your Community from Phone Scammers**

March 2021 | Volume 14 | Issue 3

The U.S. Department Justice’s (DOJ) Elder Justice Initiative, Transnational Elder Fraud Strike Force, and Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS Office) invite you to join a webinar on 

**Tackling Transnational Robocall Scams: The Importance of State and Federal Partnerships,** to be held on April 13, 2021, at 2:00 p.m. ET.

The webinar will discuss what the scams are and how they work. It will delve into local and state law enforcement’s vital role in the fight against these scams. It will also describe investigative techniques that state and local law enforcement can use in the fight against transnational scammers. Finally, it will touch upon public education tools that can help community members protect themselves from scammers. 

Presenters include **Jolee Porter**, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Northern District of Georgia, currently detailed to the Transnational Elder Fraud Strike Force at the U.S. DOJ Consumer Protection Branch; **Jon Heslep**, Senior Special Agent, Office of Inspector General, Social Security Administration; and **Margaret Moore**, Detective, Aiken (South Carolina) Department of Public Safety.

To join, please register for Tackling Transnational Robocall Scams.

Tweet

**Subscribe to Email Updates**
To sign up for monthly updates or to access your subscriber preferences, please enter your email address in the Subscribe box.

The Community Policing Dispatch is the e-newsletter of the COPS Office. 

The Community Policing Dispatch is the e-newsletter of the COPS Office. 

**Explore**
            - Home
            - About Us
            - Archives
            - Events
            - Publications
            - Contact Us

**
Connect With Us 
**
Want to stay connected with the COPS office?             Follow us on social media!
            - 
            - 
            - 
- 
- 
- 

             FOIA 

             No FEAR Act 

             Open Government 

             Plain Writing 

             USA.gov 

             Legal Policies and Disclaimers 

             Language Access Plan 

             DOJ Privacy Policy
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Steven Alfonzo Deleon, * From the 104th District

 Court of Taylor County,

 Trial Court No. 19080B.

Vs. No. 11-14-00350-CR * December 30, 2016

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Willson, J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., 

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, we modify the judgment of the trial court to reflect that the sentence in 

Cause No. 19080B shall concurrently with the sentence in Cause No. 18365B. 

As modified, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
V

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4889

To authorize issuance of a certificate of documentation with appropriate

endorsement for the vessel ISLAND STAR.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 2, 1994

Mr. GILLMOR of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To authorize issuance of a certificate of documentation with

appropriate endorsement for the vessel ISLAND STAR.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. Notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant

4 Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the Act of June

5 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and sections 12106,

6 12107, and 12108 of title 46, United States Code, as ap7 plicable on the date of this Act, the Secretary of Transpor8 tation may issue a certificate of documentation with ap-
2

HR 4889 IH

1 propriate endorsement for the vessel ISLAND STAR

2 (United States official number 673537).

Æ
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Victor J. Salerno, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of American Wagering, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and the internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f)
and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date: May 1, 2009

/s/ VICTOR J. SALERNOVictor J. Salerno, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)


---
Editorial Note on Part 97
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 97 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 97.213 Telecommand of an amateur station. An amateur station on or within 50 km of the Earth's surface may be under telecommand where: ( a ) There is a radio or wireline control link between the control point and the station sufficient for the control operator to perform his/her duties. If radio, the control link must use an auxiliary station. A control link using a fiber optic cable or another telecommunication service is considered wireline.
( b ) Provisions are incorporated to limit transmission by the station to a period of no more than 3 minutes in the event of malfunction in the control link.
( c ) The station is protected against making, willfully or negligently, unauthorized transmissions.
( d ) A photocopy of the station license and a label with the name, address, and telephone number of the station licensee and at least one designated control operator is posted in a conspicuous place at the station location.
[54 FR 25857, June 20, 1989, as amended at 56 FR 56171, Nov. 1, 1991]
§ 73.1705 Time of operation. ( a ) Commercial and noncommercial educational TV and commercial FM stations will be licensed for unlimited time operation. Application may be made for voluntary share-time operation.
( b ) Noncommercial educational FM stations will be licensed for unlimited and share time operation according to the provisions of § 73.561.
( c ) AM stations in the 535-1705 kHz band will be licensed for unlimited time. In the 535-1605 kHz band, stations that apply for share time and specified hours operations may also be licensed. AM stations licensed to operate daytime-only and limited-time may continue to do so; however, no new such stations will be authorized, except for fulltime stations that reduce operating hours to daytime-only for interference reduction purposes.
[43 FR 45849, Oct. 4, 1978, as amended at 56 FR 64872, Dec. 12, 1991]
1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 40-F of PolyMet Mining Corp. (“the Company”);
 
 2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.
The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the Company and have:
 
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b)  Designed such internal controls over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 
 (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the Annual Report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
 5.
The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date: March 27, 2018
/s/ Jonathan CherryName: Jonathan CherryTitle: Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Editorial Note on Part 74
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 74 appear at 64 FR 4055, Jan. 27, 1999.

§ 74.882 Station identification. ( a ) For transmitters used for voice transmissions and having a transmitter output power exceeding 50 mW, an announcement shall be made at the beginning and end of each period of operation at a single location, over the transmitting unit being operated, identifying the transmitting unit's call sign or designator, its location, and the call sign of the broadcasting station or name of the licensee with which it is being used. A period of operation may consist of a continuous transmission or intermittent transmissions pertaining to a single event.
( b ) Each wireless video assist device, when transmitting, must transmit station identification at the beginning and end of each period of operation. Identification may be made by transmitting the station call sign by visual or aural means or by automatic transmission in international Morse telegraphy. ( 1 ) A period of operation is defined as a single uninterrupted transmission or a series of intermittent transmissions from a single location.
( 2 ) Station identification shall be performed in a manner conducive to prompt association of the signal source with the responsible licensee. In exercising the discretion provide by this rule, licensees are expected too act in a responsible manner to assure that result.
[68 FR 12774, Mar. 17, 2003]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to the requirements set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersigned, in his capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of Del Monte Foods Company, hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | The annual report of Del Monte Foods Company on Form 10-K for the period ended May 3, 2009, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Periodic
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Del Monte Foods Company at the end
of and for the period covered by the Periodic Report.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: July 1, 2009



/s/    RICHARD G.
WOLFORDRichard G. Wolford Chairman of the Board, Presidentand Chief Executive Officer; Director


This certification accompanies and is being furnished with this Periodic Report, shall not be
deemed filed by Del Monte Foods Company (the Company) for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability under that Section and shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Periodic Report, irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Del Monte Foods Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

597 

CA 14-01306 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, AND VALENTINO, JJ. 

IN THE MATTER OF PROBATE OF THE LAST WILL 

AND TESTAMENT OF ROBERT BODKIN, ALSO KNOWN AS 

ROBERT C. BODKIN, DECEASED. 

------------------------------------------------ MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ROBIN P. GRAHAM, PRELIMINARY EXECUTOR OF THE 

ESTATE OF ROBERT BODKIN, ALSO KNOWN AS ROBERT C. 

BODKIN, DECEASED, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT;

 

DAWN GUETTI AND WILLIAM J. BODKIN, 

OBJECTANTS-APPELLANTS; 

NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE, 

RESPONDENT. 

(APPEAL NO. 1.) 

GROSS, SHUMAN, BRIZDLE & GILFILLAN, P.C., BUFFALO (LESLIE MARK

GREENBAUM OF COUNSEL), FOR OBJECTANTS-APPELLANTS. 

PHILLIPS LYTLE LLP, BUFFALO (ALAN J. BOZER OF COUNSEL), FOR

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Erie County

(Barbara Howe, S.), entered October 2, 2012. The order denied the

motion of objectants to disqualify counsel for petitioner. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Matter of Bodkin ([appeal No. 3] ___ AD3d

___ [May 8, 2015]).

Entered: May 8, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to 10 U.S.C.  Section  1350 as adopted  pursuant to Section 1350 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  in  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of
Electronic Game Card, Inc. on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending June 30, 2005,
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report") for Electronic  Game Card,  Inc.,  (the  "Company"),  the  undersigned
hereby certifies that:

(1)      to the  best of my  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with  the
         requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

(2)      to the best of my knowledge,  the  information  contained in the Report
         fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and
         result of operations of the Company.

May 5, 2006


/S/ LEE COLE
-------------------------------
    LEE COLE
    ACTING PRESIDENT AND ACTING
    CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
**Exhibit 23**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS**
     We have issued our reports dated April 27, 2004 (except for paragraphnumber 1 in Note 11 to the financial statements, as to which the date is May13, 2004 and paragraph number 3 in Note 11, as to which the date is June 2,2004) accompanying the consolidated financial statements and schedule ofStellent, Inc. and subsidiaries which are incorporated by reference or includedin the Annual report on Form 10-K of Stellent, Inc. for the year ended March31, 2004. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reportsin the Registration Statements of Stellent, Inc. and subsidiaries on Forms S-8(No. 333-11489, No. 333-66449, No. 333-66451, No. 333-90843, No. 333-47228, No.333-47216, No. 333-47214, No. 333-47212, No. 333-69080, No. 333-75828, No.333-102130, 333-116148 and 333-116000) and Form S-3 (No. 333-66094).    /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP   Minneapolis, Minnesota  June 11, 2004
#### § 90.138 Applications for itinerant frequencies.

An application for authority to conduct an itinerant operation in the Industrial/Business Pool must be restricted to use of itinerant frequencies or other frequencies not designated for permanent use and need not be accompanied by evidence of frequency coordination. Users should be aware that no interference protection is provided from other itinerant operations.

[72 FR 35194, June 27, 2007]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - 14 CFR Part 71
          - [Docket No. FAA-2006-24243; Airspace Docket No. 06-AWP-11]
          - RIN 2120-AA66

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

 Direct final rule, confirmation of effective date.

# SUMMARY:

This document confirms the effective date of the direct final rule which revokes a Class D Airspace at Elko, NV.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         0901 UTC October 26, 2006.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Larry Tonish, Western Terminal Operations Airspace Specialist, AWP-5420.1, Federal Aviation Administration, 15000 Aviation Boulevard, Lawndale, California 90261, telephone (310) 725-6539.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for comments in the                     **Federal Register**                     on July 18, 2006 (17 FR 40651). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse comment, were received with the comment period, the regulation will become effective on October 26, 2006, as per the direct final rule. No adverse comments were received, and thus this notice confirms that this direct final rule will become effective on that date.                

Issued in Los Angeles, California, on August 23, 2006. 

Leonard Mobley,

Acting Director, Western Terminal Operations.

[FR Doc. 06-7458 Filed 9-5-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
The State of 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 25, 2015

No. 04-14-00551-CV

Pablo SOLIZ,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 79th Judicial District Court, Brooks County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14-02-16542-CV

David Wellington Chew, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file a motion for rehearing is granted. We 

order any motion for rehearing due September 5, 2015.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 25th day of August, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### § 5.505 Exemption from station identification requirement.

Compliance testing experimental licensees are exempt from complying with the station identification requirements of § 5.115.
No. 11-5744.

#### Walker *v.*Florida.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.
#### § 78.75 Equal employment opportunities.

See Subpart E, Part 76 of this chapter.

[51 FR 9966, Mar. 24, 1986]
#### § 14.81 Marking requirement.

Except as otherwise provided in this subpart, no person may import, export, or transport in interstate commerce any container or package containing any fish or wildlife (including shellfish and fishery products) unless he/she marks each container or package conspicuously on the outside with both the name and address of the shipper and consignee. An accurate and legible list of its contents by species scientific name and the number of each species and whether or not the listed species are venomous must accompany the entire shipment.

[61 FR 31870, June 21, 1996]