alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Guy Gecht, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this amendment to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Electronics For Imaging, Inc.; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: April 30, 2009 |  |  |  | /S/    GUY
GECHT       
|                     |  |  |  | Guy Gecht              
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 169 (Thursday, August 31, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 51851]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7295]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act

    Notice is hereby given that on August 23, 2006 a proposed Consent 
Decree in United States v. Mallinckrodt et. al, Civil Action No. 
4:02CV1488, was lodged with the United States District Court for the 
Eastern District of Missouri. In this action the United States sought 
recovery of response costs incurred by the Environmental Protection 
Agency at the Great Lakes Container Corporation Superfund Site located 
in St. Louis, Missouri. The Consent Decree requires Defendant Shell Oil 
Company to reimburse the United States $228,630.00 in response costs.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the Consent 
Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, 
Environment and Natural Resources Division, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611, and should refer to 
United States v. Mallinckrodt, et. al. D.J. Ref. 90-11-3-07280. The 
Consent Decree may be examined at the Office of the United States 
Attorney, Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse, 111 South 10th Street, 
20th Floor, St. Louis, MO 63102, and at U.S. EPA Region VII, 901 North 
5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66025. During the public comment 
period, the Consent Decree may also be examined on the following 
Department of Justice Web site, to http://www/usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_Decree.html. A copy of the Consent Decree may also be obtained by mail 
from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of 
Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611 or by faxing or e-mailing a request 
to Tonia Fleetwood (<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#31455e5f58501f575d545445465e5e55714442555e5b1f565e47"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="63170c0d0a024d050f060617140c0c07231610070c094d040c15">[email protected]</span></a>), fax no. (202) 514-0097, 
phone confirmation number (202) 514-1547. In requesting a copy from the 
Consent Decree Library, please enclose a check in the amount of $4.75 
(without attachments) or $5.75 (with attachments) for United States v. 
Mallinckrodt, et al. (25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to 
the U.S. Treasury.

Bruce Gelber,
Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 06-7295 Filed 8-30-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5058 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5058

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in coastwise 
   trade in Alaska for a limited period for the vessel ATLANTIS III.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 19, 1994

 Ms. Cantwell introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in coastwise 
   trade in Alaska for a limited period for the vessel ATLANTIS III.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the 
Act of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and sections 12102 and 12106 
of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may 
issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for 
employment in the coastwise trade in Alaska during the period beginning 
May 1, 1995, and ending October 31, 1996, for the vessel ATLANTIS III 
(United States official number 006455).
                                 <all>
```
§ 95.2141 LPRS antenna height and directivity requirements. LPRS operators must ensure that their stations satisfy the antenna requirements in this section. ( a ) For LPRS units where the antenna is an integral part of the unit, and for LPRS stations operating entirely within an enclosed structure, e.g., a building, there is no limit on antenna height.
( b ) For all other LPRS units, the tip of the antenna must not exceed 30.5 meters (100 feet) above ground level. If harmful interference occurs, the FCC may require that the LPRS station antenna height be reduced.
( c ) Directional transmit antennas must be used for LPRS stations used with AMTS.
( d ) LPRS antennas must also meet the requirements in § 95.317 regarding menaces to air navigation. *See* 47 CFR 95.317 and consult part 17 of the FCC's Rules for more information (47 CFR part 17).
#  US-Czech Cyber Information Sharing Roundtable Discussion

/ Published Nov. 23, 2018
The College of Information and Cyberspace hosted the 2018 US-Czech Cyber Information Sharing Roundtable Discussion, including Daniel Bagge (Czech Cyber Attach), Major General (Ret) George Franz (Military Cyber Professionals Association and former USCYBERCOM J3), Paul de Souza (Cyber Security Forum Initiative), Roman Packa (Head of National Strategy and Policy Unit at the Czech National Cyber and Information Security Agency), Sean Kanuck (National Intelligence Officer for Cyber Issues at the ODNI), Tomas Minarik (Researcher at the NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence in Estonia), Dr. Gwyneth Sutherlin (NDU CIC), and Harry Wingo (NDU CIC and Moderator).
§ 90.1319 Policies governing the use of the 3650-3700 MHz band. ( a ) Channels in this band are available on a shared basis only and will not be assigned for the exclusive use of any licensee.
( b ) Any base, fixed, or mobile station operating in the band must employ a contention-based protocol.
( c ) Equipment incorporating an unrestricted contention-based protocol (i.e. one capable of avoiding co-frequency interference with devices using all other types of contention-based protocols) may operate throughout the 50 megahertz of this frequency band. Equipment incorporating a restricted contention-based protocol (i.e. one that does not qualify as unrestricted) may operate in, and shall only tune over, the lower 25 megahertz of this frequency band.
( d ) All applicants and licensees shall cooperate in the selection and use of frequencies in the 3650-3700 MHz band in order to minimize the potential for interference and make the most effective use of the authorized facilities. A database identifying the locations of registered stations will be available at *http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls .* Licensees should examine this database before seeking station authorization, and make every effort to ensure that their fixed and base stations operate at a location, and with technical parameters, that will minimize the potential to cause and receive interference. Licensees of stations suffering or causing harmful interference are expected to cooperate and resolve this problem by mutually satisfactory arrangements.
[72 FR 40722, July 25, 2007]
§ 95.2561 MedRadio transmitter certification. ( a ) Except as provided § 95.2535, each MedRadio transmitter (a transmitter that operates or is intended to operate as a station in the MedRadio Service) must be certified in accordance with this subpart and part 2 of this chapter.
( b ) A grant of equipment certification for the MedRadio Service will not be issued for any MedRadio transmitter type that fails to comply with all of the applicable rules in this subpart.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

UNILOC 2017 LLC,

Appellant

v.

FACEBOOK, INC., WHATSAPP, INC.,

Appellees

______________________ 

2018-2251

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2016-

01756.

______________________ 

PER CURIAM. 

O R D E R

In light of this court’s decision in Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith 

& Nephew, Inc., No. 18-2140 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 31, 2019) and 

the fact that Uniloc has raised an Appointments Clause 

challenge in its opening brief in this case, 

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

1. The oral argument scheduled for November 4, 2019 

is cancelled and the case is removed from the calendar.
2 UNILOC 2017 LLC v. FACEBOOK, INC. 

2. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s decision in 

No. IPR2016-01756 is vacated and the case is remanded to 

the Board for proceedings consistent with this court’s decision in Arthrex. 

 FOR THE COURT

 October 31, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
No. 11-5859.

#### Ashiegbu *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Michael R. O’Brien, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Jones Soda Co.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: 

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles; 

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a. All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

Dated as of November 10, 2008
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.8

                             FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
                         EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

     This First Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement is entered into on
this 26th day of February, 2007 and effective as of January 1, 2007, by and
between Calton, Inc. (the "Employer" or the "Company"), a New Jersey corporation
which maintains its principal executive offices at 2050 40th Avenue, Suite One,
Vero Beach, Florida 32960, and Anthony J. Caldarone (the "Executive"), an
individual residing at 162 Anchor Drive, Vero Beach, Florida 32963.

     WHEREAS, the Employer and Executive have entered into an Executive
Employment Agreement dated as of January 1, 2006 (the "Employment Agreement");

     WHEREAS, the term of the Employment Agreement expires on December 31, 2006;

     WHEREAS, the Employer and Executive wish to extend the term of the
Employment Agreement to December 31, 2007;

     WHEREAS, in 2007, the Executive agreed that his Base Compensation would be
$1.00 per annum in order to reduce the Company's operating expenses;

     WHEREAS, the Employer and Executive wish to amend the Employment Agreement
to confirm the arrangements described above;

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the representations, covenants and
agreements contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and intending to be
legally bound hereby, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1.   Extension of Term. Section1.1 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended
     to read in its entirety as follows:

          1.1 Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence on January 1, 2007
     and end on December 31, 2007 (the "Term"), unless further extended or
     sooner terminated as hereinafter provided.

2.   Salary Adjustment. The first sentence of Section 2.1 of the Employment
     Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

          "During the period of the Executive's employment hereunder, the
          Executive shall receive a salary of One ($1.00) Dollar per annum paid
          in accordance with the Employer's normal payroll procedures (the "Base
          Compensation").

<PAGE>

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the day and
year first written above.

WITNESS:


                                            /s/ Anthony J. Caldarone
-------------------------------------       ------------------------------------
                                            Anthony J. Caldarone

ATTEST:                                     CALTON, INC.


                                        By: /s/ Laura A. Camisa
-------------------------------------       ------------------------------------
Mary Magee, Secretary                       Laura A. Camisa, Senior Vice
                                               President and Chief Financial
                                               Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 175 (Monday, September 11, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 53477]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7531]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Partial Consent Decree Under the Clean Water 
Act

    Notice is hereby given that on August 15, 2006, a proposed Second 
Partial Consent Decree in United States v. City of San Diego, Civil 
Action No. 03-CV-1349K (POR), was lodged with the United States 
District Court for the Southern District of California. The United 
States' action is consolidated with San Diego Baykeeper, et al. v. City 
of San Diego, Civil Action No. 01-CV-0550B (POR), and State of 
California v. City of San Diego, Civil Action No. 03-CV-1381J (POR).
    In this action the United States seeks penalties and injunctive 
relief to address sanitary sewer overflows and other violations of the 
Clean Water Act (``Act'') and the City of San Diego's National 
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit.
    Under this Second Partial Consent Decree, the City will, among 
other requirements: (1) Inspect, rehabilitate, and replace portions of 
the sewer system; (2) control root problems; (3) clean a specified 
amount of sewer pipe; (4) implement a grease blockage control program; 
and (5) perform analyses of canyon-based sewer lines.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the Second 
Partial Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, P.O. Box 
7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611, and should 
refer to United States v. City of San Diego, Civil Action No. 03-CV-
1349K (POR), D.J. Ref. 90-5-1-1-4364/1.
    The Second Partial Consent Decree may be examined at U.S. EPA 
Region 9, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105. During 
the public comment period, the Second Partial Consent Decree may also 
be examined on the following Department of Justice Web site at http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the Second Partial 
Consent Decree may also be obtained by mail from the Consent Decree 
Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 
20044-7611 or by faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia Fleetwood 
([email protected]), fax no. (202) 514-0097, phone confirmation 
number (202) 514-1547. In requesting a copy from the Consent Decree 
Library, please enclose a check in the amount of $13.75 (25 cents per 
page reproduction cost) payable to the U.S. Treasury or, if by e-mail 
or fax, forward a check in that amount to the Consent Decree Library at 
the stated address.

Henry Friedman,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment 
and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 06-7531 Filed 9-8-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
```
#### Harry L. Norton, appellant, v. Lincoln Traction Company, appellee.

Filed December 18, 1912.

No. 16,845.

New Trial: Amount of Damages. “In an action for personal injuries, a new trial will not be granted on account of smallness of damages.” *O’Reilly v. Hoover,*70 Neb. 357.

Appeal from the district court for Lancaster county: Albert J. Cornish, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*M. L. Kimmel, T. J. Doyle*and *Q-. L. De Lacy,*for appellant.

*O. 8. Allen, contra.*

Rose, J.

This is an action to recover damages in the sum of $10,000 for personal injuries caused by the alleged negligence of defendant in running a street car, on. which plaintiff was a passenger, rapidly around a curve at Sixteenth and M streets in the city of Lincoln, and in throwing him *650violently to the pavement. The answer was a general denial and a plea of negligence on the part of plaintiff. From a judgment on a verdict in favor of plaintiff for one dollar, he has appealed.

The controlling question for review is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a verdict for one dollar only. Plaintiff was seriously injured. The jury found in his favor. He insists that evidence of his hospital expenses and of other definite items of pecuniary damage amounting to $220.70 is undisputed; that therefore the verdict is too small to he sustained by the evidence; and that consequently a new trial should be granted. Defendant’s answer to this argument is that section 315 of the code forbids the granting of a new trial on account of the smallness of damages awarded by a jury in an action for personal injuries. The precise question was considered in *O’Reilly v. Hoover,*70 Neb. 357, and it was there held: “In an action for personal injuries, a new trial will not be granted on account of smallness of damages.” Section 315 of the code, though repealed in 1911 (laws 1911, ch. 169), was in force when the trial court overruled plaintiff’s motion for a new trial in the present action, and is binding on the parties thereto. The judgment below cannot be reversed Avithout overruling the case cited, and it is deemed inadvisable to do so. Adherence to that case leaves the proceedings below without error.

Affirmed.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4158 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.