alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"2021-1561: Fleming v. Cirrus Design Corporation - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Y1PodDElTZ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/01-14-2022-2021-1561-fleming-v-cirrus-design-corporation-audio-uploaded\/\">2021-1561: Fleming v. Cirrus Design Corporation<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/01-14-2022-2021-1561-fleming-v-cirrus-design-corporation-audio-uploaded\/embed\/#?secret=Y1PodDElTZ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“2021-1561: Fleming v. Cirrus Design Corporation” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"Y1PodDElTZ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Oral argument audio posted: Fleming v. Cirrus Design Corporation (mp3) Appeal Number: 2021-1561 To listen to more oral argument recordings, follow this link: Listen To Oral Arguments."}
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P333Procedural Justice for Law Enforcement: An OverviewProcedural justice has become an important focal point in the profession and strategy of policing in recent years. The purpose of this publication is to introduce law enforcement professionals to the concept of procedural justice and to encourage law enforcement to research the concept beyond what is captured in this introduction. The goal of this publication is to have a national understanding of procedural justice in policing and to strive towards institutionalizing the concepts throughout agencies across the country to build trust and confidence and advance public safety.By Laura Kunard, Charlene MoeCategories: Community PartnershipsLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p333Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFBook • Oct 2015Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 02:34 (UTC-5) in 0.19 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
EXHIBIT
32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the report of FOMO WORLDWIDE, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2022 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, as the Company’s
principal executive, financial and accounting officer hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



|(1) | The
    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                   
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                             
|(2) | The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of the Company.



FOMO
WORLDWIDE, INC.



|By:                                                                                                                                 | /s/ Vikram Grover | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------- | 
|Vikram
    Grover                                                                                                                   |                  
|Chief
                                            Executive Officer
    (principal
    executive, financial and accounting officer) |                  
|April
    14, 2023                                                                                                                  |                  
|                                                                                                                                    |                  
|/s/
    Vikram Grover                                                                                                               |                  
|Vikram
    Grover                                                                                                                   |                  
|Chief
    Financial Officer                                                                                                         |                  
|April
    14, 2023                                                                                                                  |
32.1
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of Milwaukee Iron Arena Football, Inc. pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Milwaukee Iron Arena Football, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Richard Astrom, Chief Executive Officer of Genesis Capital Corporation of Nevada, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated: May 24, 2010





/s/ RICHARD ASTROM


Richard Astrom


Chief Executive Officer
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1268/2005

of 1 August 2005         

amending Regulation (EEC) No 2191/81 on the granting of aid for the purchase of butter by non-profit making institutions and organisations

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular Article 15 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In the first subparagraph of Article 2(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2191/81, the amount ‘EUR 80’ is replaced by the amount ‘EUR 60’.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from 1 September 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 1 August 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

(2)OJ L 213, 1.8.1981, p. 20. Regulation last amended by Regulation (EC) No 181/2005 (OJ L 30, 3.2.2005, p. 8).

----
#### § 76.110 Substitutions.

Whenever, pursuant to the requirements of the syndicated exclusivity rules, a community unit is required to delete a television program on a broadcast signal that is permitted to be carried under the Commission's rules, such community unit may, consistent with these rules, substitute a program from any other television broadcast station. Programs substituted pursuant to this section may be carried to their completion.

[65 FR 68101, Nov. 14, 2000, as amended at 79 FR 63562, Oct. 24, 2014]
EXHIBIT 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
AMC Financial, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
No.333-1348 on Form S-8, registration statement No. 333-11383 on Form S-3,
registration statement No. 333-28467 on Form S-3, registration statement
No.333-36573 on Form S-3, registration statement No. 333-36055 on Form S-8 and
registration statement No. 333-28465 on Form S-3 of Cityscape Financial Corp. of
our report dated March 10, 2000, relating to the consolidated statements of
financial condition of AMC Financial, Inc. (Formerly Cityscape Financial Corp.)
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the
six-month period ended December 31, 1999, the six-month period ended June 30,
1999, and for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 1998,
which report appears in the December 31, 1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K of AMC
Financial, Inc. Our report dated March 10, 2000, does not express an opinion on
the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the six-month period
ended June 30, 1999, and for each of the years in the two-year period ended
December 31, 1998, because of uncertainties about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern as a result of its filing for bankruptcy. The
consolidated financial statements for each of years in the two-year period ended
December 31, 1998, do not include any adjustments that resulted from the outcome
of these uncertainties.



                                          /s/ KPMG LLP

Houston, Texas
April 11, 2000
#### § 80.509 Frequency assignment.

Frequencies assignable to private coast stations and marine utility stations are listed in subpart H.
No. 11-123.

#### Accumarine Transportation, LP *v.*Regions Equipment Finance Corp.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
N. Y. SUPERIOR COURT.

#### Henry Brash agt. Jacob Wielarsky.

The county clerk of New York county will please search for affidavits on attachment in this action, filed in his office since November 18th, 1868, to date.

December 4, 1868.

REID & SOLOMON,

*Attorneys.-*

None found.

December 4, 1868, 9 A. m.

Chas. E. Loew, *Clerk.*

Charles H. Smith, Jr., *for motion.*

S. Hirsch, *for plaintiff, opposed.*

Jones, J.

The non-filing of the affidavit does not affect the validity of the warrant or of the proceedings thereunder. Motion denied with $10 costs, without prejudice, to renew-on affidavits upon payment of said $10 costs.
#### §§ 95.981-95.985 [Reserved]
§ 69.809 Low-end adjustment mechanism. ( a ) Any price cap local exchange carrier or any affiliate of any price cap local exchange carrier that had obtained Phase II pricing flexibility under § 69.709 or § 69.711 for any service in any MSA in its service region, or for the non-MSA portion of any study area in its service region, shall be prohibited from making any low-end adjustment pursuant to § 61.45(d)(1)(vii) of this chapter in all or part of its service region.
( b ) Any price cap local exchange carrier or any affiliate of any price cap local exchange carrier that exercises the regulatory relief pursuant to § 69.807 in any part of its service region shall be prohibited from making any low-end adjustment pursuant to § 61.45(d)(1)(vii) of this chapter in all or part of its service region.
( c ) Any price cap local exchange carrier or any affiliate of any price cap local exchange carrier that exercises the option to use generally accepted accounting principles rather than the uniform system of accounts pursuant to § 32.11(g) of this chapter shall be prohibited from making any low-end adjustment pursuant to § 61.45(d)(1)(vii) of this chapter in all or part of its service region.
Exhibit
32.1


Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
 Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 I,
Agustin Gomez de Segura, President and Chief Executive Officer of Cigma Metals
Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 1.
              The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March
      31, 2008 which this certification accompanies fully complies with the
      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934: and
 
 2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 Date:
              February 17, 2010
              BY:
              /s/ Agustin Gomez de
  SeguraAgustin
      Gomez de SeguraPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
  Officer
 
 This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
#### § 90.808 [Reserved]
March 19 2007 8K Exhibit 10.2




                                                   Exhibit 10.2


AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement (the "Amendment") is made and entered into as of
____________, 2007, by and between Gottschalks, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and James Famalette
(the "Employee").



Recitals

A.The Company and Employee are parties to an employment agreement made and entered into as of December 20, 2005 (the
"Agreement").


B.Pursuant to Section 8.2 of the Agreement, both the Company and Employee desire to amend the Agreement as set forth
below.





In consideration of the mutual covenants and promises of the parties, the Company and Employee amend the Agreement by
adding a new Section 8.11 to the Agreement to read as follows effective as of December 20, 2005:


"Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, the portion of any severance benefit under this Agreement
required to be paid to Employee during the first six months following the date of Employee's termination shall be delayed and paid to
Employee in a lump sum as soon as administratively practicable following the end of such six-month period in accordance with the
requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code ("Section 409A"); provided, however, no such six-month delay
in payments shall apply to the extent that guidance issued under Section 409A allows payments to made when otherwise due without
subjecting Employee to additional taxes under Section 409A."




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.


GOTTSCHALKS INC.


By: ____________________

Its: ____________________


 

 

EMPLOYEE


By: ____________________

       James Famalette
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5009

To extend the Export Administration Act of 1979.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 21, 1994

Mr. HAMILTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Foreign Affairs

A BILL

To extend the Export Administration Act of 1979.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 20 of the Export Administration Act

4 of 1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 2419) is amended by striking

5 ‘‘August 20, 1994’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘October

6 20, 1994’’.

Æ
No. 11-149.

#### Donley *v.*Ordeneaux et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the [Quarterly][Annual] Report of Outlook Group Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
C. Fischer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to sec.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

                                                  /s/ Richard C. Fischer
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Richard C. Fischer
                                          Chief Executive Officer

August 19, 2003

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Outlook Group
Corp. and will be retained by Outlook Group Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 95.935 Unauthorized use of non-CBRS transmitters. The operator of a CBRS station must not use a non-CBRS transmitter to communicate with or attempt to communicate with stations in the CBRS. ( a ) *Non-CBRS transmitters.* For the purposes of this section, “non-CBRS transmitters” are transmitters that are technically capable of operation in the 26-30 MHz frequency range, but are intended for use in the Amateur Radio Service (*see* part 97 of this chapter) or other government or non-government radio services, and are not certified for use in the CBRS.
( b ) *Unlicensed operation.* The operation of non-CBRS transmitters on the CBRS channels is not authorized by § 95.305 of this part. Accordingly, the FCC considers any such operation to be a violation of section 301 of the Communications Act (47 U.S.C. 301).