alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 97
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 97 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 97.215 Telecommand of model craft. An amateur station transmitting signals to control a model craft may be operated as follows: ( a ) The station identification procedure is not required for transmissions directed only to the model craft, provided that a label indicating the station call sign and the station licensee's name and address is affixed to the station transmitter.
( b ) The control signals are not considered codes or ciphers intended to obscure the meaning of the communication.
( c ) The transmitter power must not exceed 1 W.
[54 FR 25857, June 20, 1989, as amended at 56 FR 56171, Nov. 1, 1991]
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In  connection  with  the Quarterly Report of Siclone Industries, Inc. (the
"Company")  on  Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bradley
S.  Shepard,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  section  1350,  as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.



                         /s/ Bradley  S.  Shepherd
                         --------------------------
                         Bradley  S.  Shepherd
                         Chief  Executive  Officer
                         August  13,  2002
§ 18.124 Authorized take allowed under a Letter of Authorization (LOA). ( a ) An LOA allows for the nonlethal, non-injurious, incidental, but not intentional take by Level B harassment, as defined in § 18.3 and under section 3 of the Marine Mammal Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 1362), of Pacific walruses and/or polar bears while conducting oil and gas industry exploration, development, and production within the Beaufort Sea ITR region described in § 18.120.
( b ) Each LOA will identify terms and conditions for each activity and location.
# CIC 2019 Cyber PME Consortium 

/ Published Jan. 1, 2019

The Department of Defense (DoD) wide Cyber Professional Military Education (PME) Consortium was established in 2019 and is led by the College of Information and Cyberspace (CIC) at National Defense University (NDU). It meets biannually in a workshop format; once a year hosted at NDU and once a year at a rotating Department of Defense institution of higher learning such as the Cyber and Innovation Policy Institute (CIPI) at the Naval War College and the Air Force Cyber College (AFCC). Images from the Summer 2019 meeting can be seen here. Workshop meetings are currently paused due to the pandemic.
No. 11-173.

#### In re Phillips.

Petition for writ of prohibition denied.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the annual report of Entorian Technologies Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Stephan Godevais, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify
pursuant to Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 30, 2010                                     
|                                                         
|/s/ Stephan B. Godevais                                  
|Stephan B. Godevais President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 95.2987 Additional PLB and MSLD certification requirements. ( a ) To be certified for use under this subpart, 406 MHz PLB transmitter types must be designed to satisfy the following additional requirements. ( 1 ) *Certifications.* Beginning January 17, 2018, before submitting an application for FCC certification of a 406 MHz PLB transmitter type, the applicant must obtain: ( i ) Certification from a test facility recognized by one of the COSPAS/SARSAT Partners that the PLB transmitter type satisfies the standards in RTCM 11010; and,
( ii ) Certification from an independent test facility that the PLB transmitter type complies with the electrical and environmental standards associated with RTCM 11010.
( 2 ) *Identification code.* An identification code, recognized by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the United States Program Manager for the 406 MHz COSPAS/SARSAT satellite system, must be programmed into each PLB to establish a unique identification for that PLB.
( b ) To be certified for use under this subpart, MSLD transmitter types must be designed to satisfy the following additional requirements. ( 1 ) A test report from a test laboratory which shows that the MSLD complies with the electrical and environmental standards associated with RTCM 11901. The test laboratory must be accredited to ISO-IEC 17025 with a scope covering the applicable requirements and test procedures.
( 2 ) After the MSLD has been certified by a test laboratory, the following information must be submitted in duplicate to the U.S. Coast Guard, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Ave. SE., Stop 7126, Washington, DC 20593-7126: ( i ) The name of the manufacturer or grantee and model number of the MSLD;
( ii ) Copies of the test report and test data showing that the MSLD complies with the electrical and environmental standards associated with RTCM 11901; and
( iii ) Instruction manuals associated with the MSLD, description of the test characteristics of the MSLD including assembly drawings, electrical schematics, description of parts list, specifications of materials and the manufacturer's quality assurance program.
( 3 ) After reviewing the information described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the U.S. Coast Guard will issue a letter stating whether the MSLD satisfies all RTCM Recommended Standards. In the case of an MSLD that includes a function intended to send a distress message directly to the U.S. Coast Guard or any other search and rescue organization, the letter will also state whether the U.S. Coast Guard endorses that function.
( 4 ) A certification application for an MSLD must contain a copy of the U.S. Coast Guard letter stating that the device satisfies all RTCM Recommended Standards, a copy of the technical test data, and the instruction manual(s).
### Revised Request for Information FAA-2015-0323 9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA) Mr. Dailey and Mr. McPeek, Please disregard the previous request for information. This email is to inform you that the FAA requires more information fo r the analysis of AGERpoint Inc. amendment (Docket No. FAA– 2015–0323), in order to access the Guided Systems Technologies, Inc SICX ­ 75. This information is necessary for th e Federal Aviation Administration (F AA) to process yo ur petition to operate the Guided Systems Technologies, Inc SICX ­ 75 to operate above 55 lbs.

z A detailed description of the Guid ed Systems Techno logies, Inc SICX ­ 75 UAS with a focus on design, configuration, features, and flight ch aracteristics to include , but not limited to: { Detailed 3 view drawings with scale of the aircraft and any launch and recovery equipment if applicable { Operational limitations, restrictions, and warnings { Operational history with supporting statistics ; particularly where AGERpoint Inc. was the principal operator { Results of analysis and flight testing of UAS, especially results that form the basis of the UAS operational envelope { Lessons learned from operational failure(s) and resultant repairs, alterations, design fixes, operational envelope changes, changes to op erational/maintenance pr ocedures and so on { Details of any injuries or property dama ge resulting from f light/ground operations { Safety analysis of any failure modes such as lost link, fly ­ away, loss of control, etc. z Copies of manuals, photogr aphs, videos/telemetry ma y be provided as support z Any other information to support an analysis of operational safety wi th the Guided Systems Technologies, Inc SICX ­ 75. Please submit the addi tional information (non ­ proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov . Once your information is submitted, please save your tracking number and then submit your tracking number along with the information submitted to the docket, and an y proprietary informatio n electronically via e ­ mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 11/18/16 . If we do not receive th e information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. FAA Office of Rulemaking Sent : Friday, November 04, 2016 12:14 PM To: adailey@agerpoint.com; tmcpeek@agerpoint.com Page 1 of 1 Revised Request for Information FAA -201 5 -032 3

11 /4/201 6 https://email.dot.gov/owa/9 -AWA -AV S -333Exemptions@faa.gov/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note ...
No. 11-258.

#### Lawyer et al. *v.*Verizon Communications, Inc., et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 87.279 Frequencies.

(a) *United States (except Alaska).* The applicant must request specific frequencies in accordance with § 2.106 of this chapter. The Commission will determine the suitability of the applicant's selection based on the probability of interference to and from existing services assigned on the same or adjacent frequencies. All new assignments of frequencies will be subject to such conditions as may be required to minimize the possibility of harmful interference to existing services.

(b) *Alaska.*

(1) Only stations which serve scheduled air carriers will be licensed. Applicants must show that the station will provide communications only along routes served by the scheduled operations of such carriers.

(2) The following frequencies are available in Alaska. These frequencies will only be licensed in conjunction with licenses for use of the aeronautical enroute frequencies specified in § 87.263(c).

| 2648.0 | 5310.0 |
| --- | --- |
| 4645.0 | 5887.5 |
| 4947.5 | 8015.0 |
| 5122.5 | |

kHz

(c) *Gulf of Mexico.* In addition to the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section, the frequencies 4550.0 and 5036.0 kHz are available in the Gulf of Mexico.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of NetFabric Holdings, Inc. (the “
Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Fahad
Syed certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





August
      18, 2010
                By:
                /s/ Fahad
      SyedName:
      Fahad SyedTitle:
      Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
NetFabric Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by NetFabric Holdings, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FORTHE TWELVE MONTHS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE
PERIOD DECEMBER 31, 1996.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,605,557
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  738,235
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,343,792
<PP&E>                                      35,888,165
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,163,236
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,094,345
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           75,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,094,345
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,094,345
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,781,622
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,302,576
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,625,368
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
MEMORANDUM

DATE: 07/14/2015

FROM: Laura Farris/EPA Region 8

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

SUBJECT: Eagle County Climate Challenge on 07/13/2015

SUMMARY: 

Laura Farris participated in a panel discussion on 07/13/2015 on the Clean Power Plan at the 

Eagle County Climate Challenge. The meeting was held in Edwards, Colorado. The Clean Power 

Plan was proposed on June 2, 2014. 

ATTENDEES:

EPA

Laura Farris, EPA Region 8

External Stakeholders

Robert Castellino, Climate Colorado

Piper Foster, Consultant

Heather Bailey, Energy Strategy and Electric Utility Development

Shawn Bruckman, Vail Honeywagon

David Ellenberger, National Wildlife Federation

John Jimison, Energy Future Coalition

Dave Finnigan, Climate Change is Elementary

Ryan Palmer, Eagle County

Irene Vilar, Americas Latino Eco Festival

Kat Habrer, TEDxVail

Phillip Haberman, Denver Public Schools

Jason Hardy, Mechanical Integrity Coordinator

Jake McCaffrey, Ownership Culture Initiative

General public
Case 16-24978 Doc 10 Filed 08/05/16 Entered 08/08/16 11:19:26 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
No. 10-10787.

#### Garcia Orellana *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4910

To designate the United States courthouse under construction in White

Plains, New York, as the ‘‘Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 5, 1994

Mr. ENGEL (for himself, Mrs. LOWEY, Mr. GILMAN, and Mr. FISH) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Public

Works and Transportation

A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse under construction in White Plains, New York, as the ‘‘Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The United States courthouse under construction at

5 300 Quarropas Street in White Plains, New York, shall

6 be known and designated as the ‘‘Thurgood Marshall

7 United States Courthouse’’.
2

•HR 4910 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

4 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

5 to be a reference to the ‘‘Thurgood Marshall United States

6 Courthouse’’.

Æ
§ 76.106 Exceptions. ( a ) Notwithstanding the requirements of §§ 76.101 through 76.105, a broadcast signal is not required to be deleted from a cable community unit when that cable community unit falls, in whole or in part, within that signal's grade B contour, or when the signal is significantly viewed pursuant to § 76.54 in the cable community.
( b ) The provisions of §§ 76.101 through 76.105 shall not apply to a cable system serving fewer than 1,000 subscribers. Within 60 days following the provision of service to 1,000 subscribers, the operator of each such system shall file a notice to that effect with the Commission, and serve a copy of that notice on every television station that would be entitled to exercise syndicated exclusivity protection against it.
#### §§ 76.1621-76.1622 [Reserved]
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                               IKONICS CORPORATION

                  COMPUTATION OF NET EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

                                   (Unaudited)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                        Nine Months Ended
                                                                        -----------------
                                                                 Sep 30, 2003     Sep 30, 2002
                                                                 ------------     ------------
<S>                                                               <C>              <C>
Net earnings applicable to common shareholders                    $  324,999       $  240,100
   for basic and diluted earnings per share


Weighted average shares outstanding for basic
   earnings per share                                              1,248,127        1,253,390


Dilutive effect of stock options computed using the
   treasury stock method and the average market price                 18,837                0

Weighted average shares outstanding for diluted
   earnings per share                                              1,266,964        1,253,390

Basic earnings per share                                          $     0.26       $     0.19

Diluted earnings per share                                        $     0.26       $     0.19
</TABLE>
No. 11-5947.

#### Figura Torrefranca *v.*Suter, Clerk, Supreme Court of the United States, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 64.6213 Payments to NDBEDP certified programs. ( a ) Programs certified under the NDBEDP shall be reimbursed for the cost of Equipment that has been distributed to low-income individuals who are deaf blind and authorized related services, up to the state's funding allocation under this program as determined by the Commission or any entity authorized to act for the Commission on delegated authority.
( b ) Upon certification and at the beginning of each TRS Fund year, state programs may elect to submit reimbursement claims on a monthly, quarterly, or semiannual basis;
( c ) Within 30 days after the end of each reimbursement period during the TRS Fund year, each certified program must submit documentation that supports its claim for reimbursement of the reasonable costs of the following: ( 1 ) Equipment and related expenses, including maintenance, repairs, warranties, returns, refurbishing, upgrading, and replacing Equipment distributed to consumers;
( 2 ) Individual needs assessments;
( 3 ) Installation of Equipment and individualized consumer training;
( 4 ) Maintenance of an inventory of Equipment that can be loaned to consumers during periods of Equipment repair or used for other NDBEDP purposes, such as conducting individual needs assessments;
( 5 ) Outreach efforts to inform state residents about the NDBEDP;
( 6 ) Train-the-trainer activities and programs;
( 7 ) Travel expenses; and
( 8 ) Administrative costs, defined as indirect and direct costs that are not included in other cost categories of this paragraph (c) and that are necessary for the operation of a program, but not to exceed 15 percent of the certified program's funding allocation.
( d ) Documentation will be provided in accordance with claim filing instructions issued by the TRS Fund Administrator. The NDBEDP Administrator and the TRS Fund Administrator may require a certified program to submit supplemental information and documentation when necessary to verify particular claims.
( e ) With each request for payment, the chief executive officer, chief financial officer, or other senior executive of the certified program, such as a manager or director, with first-hand knowledge of the accuracy and completeness of the claim in the request, must certify as follows:
I swear under penalty of perjury that I am (name and title), an officer of the above-named reporting entity, and that I have examined all cost data associated with equipment and related services for the claims submitted herein, and that all such data are true and an accurate statement of the business activities conducted pursuant to the NDBEDP by the above-named certified program.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Landec Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending May 29, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gary T. Steele, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:  August 5, 2011





/s/ Gary T. SteeleGary T. SteeleChief Executive Officer and President(Principal Executive Officer)





*
The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.