alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 80.854 Radiotelephone installation. The radiotelephone installation includes: ( a ) A radiotelephone transmitter;
( b ) A receiver as specified in § 80.858(a);
( c ) A main source of energy;
( d ) A reserve source of energy, when required by § 80.860(a);
( e ) An antenna system.
[51 FR 31213, Sept. 2, 1986, as amended at 76 FR 67615, Nov. 2, 2011]
**Exhibit 31.2**I, Eric P. Graap, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fauquier Bankshares, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Dated: May 11, 2007/s/ Eric P. Graap
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 11.0

                              GA FINANCIAL, INC.
                      STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF
                    EARNINGS PER SHARE FOR THE YEARS ENDED
                          DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1996
               (Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            For the Calendar Year
                                                           -----------------------
                                                               1997       1996
                                                           ----------- -----------
<S>                                                        <C>         <C>
Basic:
  Net income.............................................  $    8,317  $    5,602

  Net income applicable to common stock..................       8,317       5,602
                                                           ----------  ----------
  Average common shares
    outstanding - basic..................................   7,021,900   7,845,214
  Basic earnings per share...............................  $     1.18  $     0.71
                                                           ----------  ----------
Diluted:
  Net income.............................................  $    8,317  $    5,602
                                                           ----------  ----------
  Average common shares outstanding - basic..............   7,021,900   7,845,214
  Effect of dilutive securities:
    Shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding
      stock options and stock awards.....................     196,188          --
  Average common shares outstanding - diluted............   7,218,088   7,845,214
                                                           ----------  ----------
Diluted earnings per share...............................  $     1.15  $     0.71
                                                           ==========  ==========
</TABLE>
No. 11-9607.

#### Messam *v.*Hastings, Administrator, East Jersey State Prison, et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Conditional 

approval
#### § 73.879 Signal retransmission.

An LPFM licensee may not retransmit, either terrestrially or via satellite, the signal of a full-power radio broadcast station.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the annual report of Staktek Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, W. Kirk Patterson, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to Title 18,
Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

Date: March 7, 2007



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/    W. KIRK
PATTERSON                         
|W. Kirk Patterson                                
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 80.921 Proof of capacity. ( a ) When directed by a representative of the Commission the vessel must prove by demonstration as prescribed in paragraphs (b), (c), (d) and (e) of this section, that the requirements of § 80.919 are met.
( b ) Proof of the ability of a storage battery used as a main or reserve power supply to operate over the 3-hour period established by a discharge test over the prescribed period of time, when supplying power at the voltage required for an electrical loss as prescribed by paragraph (d) of this section.
( c ) When the required power supply consists of an engine-driven generator, proof of the adequacy of the engine fuel supply to operate the unit over the 3-hour period of time may be established by using as a basis the fuel consumption during a 1 hour period when supplying power, at the voltage required for operating an electrical load as prescribed by paragraph (d) of this section.
( d ) In determining the required electrical load the following formula must be used: ( 1 ) One-half of the current of the required transmitter at its rated output power; plus
( 2 ) Current of the required receiver; plus
( 3 ) Current of electric light, if required by § 80.925; plus
( 4 ) The sum of the current of all other loads the reserve power supply may provide in time of emergency.
( e ) At the conclusion of the test specified in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, no part of the main or reserve power supply must have an excessive temperature rise, nor must the specific gravity or voltage of any storage battery be below the 90 percent discharge point.
Jump to content

consumer.govwhat to know and do

MenuMenuChange menu visibility

## CG: Main Navigation

                          -  Managing Your Money 
                          -  Credit, Loans and Debt 
                          -  Scams and Identity Theft 
                          -  Toolbox 

Español

# Videos

You can also view these videos on our Consumer.gov YouTube playlist.

## Managing Your Money

### Making a Budget

This video shows how keeping a budget helps someone pay all his bills.

### Opening a Bank Account

This video shows how someone compares the costs when choosing a place to open savings and checking accounts.

### Cashing a Paycheck

How to avoid big fees when cashing a paycheck.This video tells you how to shop around to avoid big fees if you don’t have a bank account to cash a paycheck. It also shows examples of how different the fees can be at various check cashing places.

### Prepaid Cards

This video shows what happens when someone gets a prepaid card without checking out the fees first.

### Renting an Apartment

This video shows how to rent an apartment even if you don't have a good credit history.

## Credit, Loans, and Debt

### Avoiding Student Loan Debt

What to do if you are having problems making your student loan payments, and how to avoid a student loan debt relief scam

### Credit Scores

This video shows what happens when one person gets a free credit report from AnnualCreditReport.com and someone else gets a “free” credit score from a TV ad.

### Minimum Payments on Credit Cards

This video shows what happens when someone makes just the minimum payment on a credit card balance.

### Payday Lending

This video shows what happens when someone gets a payday loan but can’t pay it back right away.

### Car Title Loans

This video shows what happens if you borrow money in exchange for your car title.

## Scams and Identity Theft

### Why Care About Identity Theft?

This video shows what happens when someone learns the hard way why she should care about her identity.

### Recovering from Identity Theft

This video shows what do to if someone steals your identity.

### Scams Against Immigrants

This video shows how someone gets into trouble with an immigration consultant – and then out of trouble again.

### Money Wiring Scams

This video shows some common money wiring scams, and what happens to some people who meet the scams.

----

## CG: Footer

                      -  Privacy Policy 
                      -  USA.gov 
                      -  Federal Trade Commission
IIA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4948

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 5 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Received

OCTOBER 8 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

AN ACT

To designate Building Number 137 of the Tuscaloosa Veterans’ Medical Center in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, as the

‘‘Claude Harris, Jr. Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 Building Number 137 of the Tuscaloosa Veterans’

3 Medical Center in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, shall be known

4 and designated as the ‘‘Claude Harris, Jr. Building’’.

5 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

6 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

7 paper, or other record of the United States to the building

8 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

9 to the ‘‘Claude Harris, Jr. Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 4,

1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
No. 11-6211.

#### Martin *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
<PAGE>
 
                               EXHIBIT 10.07(iii)

<PAGE>
 
                                    FORM OF
                                   AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                               CUSTOMER AGREEMENT

     This Customer Agreement Amendment ("Amendment") is made as of this 1st day
of [MONTH, YEAR] by and between [THE FUND] (the "Fund") and Merrill Lynch
Futures Inc.

                              W I T N E S S E T H:

     WHEREAS, the parties hereto entered into a Customer Agreement relating to
the purchase and sale of commodity futures and forward contracts and commodity
options (the "Customer Agreement");

     WHEREAS, the parties hereto have agreed to reduce the brokerage commissions
paid by the Fund to Merrill Lynch Futures Inc., the Fund's commodity broker,
pursuant to the Customer Agreement and wish to amend the Customer Agreement
accordingly;

     NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants
contained in the Customer Agreement and herein, the receipt and sufficiency of
which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree to amend the Customer
Agreement as follows:

     1.  Brokerage Commissions. Beginning [DATE, YEAR] the brokerage commissions
         ---------------------                                                  
payable by the Fund to Merrill Lynch Futures Inc. will be reduced to ______ of
1% of month-end Net Assets, before reduction for such monthly brokerage
commissions and any New Profits Account allocation but after the crediting of
interest income received during the month (a ____% annual rate). Such brokerage
commissions shall not include any administrative fee paid directly to Merrill
Lynch Investment Partners Inc.

     2.  Amendment.  This Amendment may not be amended except by the written
         ---------                                                          
consent of each of the parties hereto.
 
     3.  Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed in one or more
         ------------                                                
counterparts, each of which shall, however, together constitute one and the same
documents.

                                      -1-

<PAGE>
 
          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed by the parties
hereto as of the day and year first above written.

 
                              [THE FUND]

                              BY:   MERRILL LYNCH INVESTMENT
                                    PARTNERS INC., General Partner


                              BY:   ________________________________
                                    Name:
                                    Title:
 


                              MERRILL LYNCH FUTURES INC.
 

                              BY:   ________________________________
                                    Name:
                                    Title:

                                      -2-
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4890 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4890

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
        coastwise trade and the fisheries for the vessel RAVEN.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 2, 1994

   Mr. Rose introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
        coastwise trade and the fisheries for the vessel RAVEN.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883) and 
sections 12106 and 12108 of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary 
of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation with 
appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade and 
fisheries for the vessel RAVEN (State of North Carolina official number 
NC6213BV).
                                 <all>
```
#### § 87.47 Application for a portable aircraft station license.

A person may apply for a portable aircraft radio station license if the need exists to operate the same station on more than one U.S. aircraft.
#### § 64.605 [Reserved]
§ 64.1100 Definitions. ( a ) The term *submitting carrier* is generally any telecommunications carrier that requests on the behalf of a subscriber that the subscriber's telecommunications carrier be changed, and seeks to provide retail services to the end user subscriber. A carrier may be treated as a submitting carrier, however, if it is responsible for any unreasonable delays in the submission of carrier change requests or for the submission of unauthorized carrier change requests, including fraudulent authorizations.
( b ) The term *executing carrier* is generally any telecommunications carrier that effects a request that a subscriber's telecommunications carrier be changed. A carrier may be treated as an executing carrier, however, if it is responsible for any unreasonable delays in the execution of carrier changes or for the execution of unauthorized carrier changes, including fraudulent authorizations.
( c ) The term *authorized carrier* is generally any telecommunications carrier that submits a change, on behalf of a subscriber, in the subscriber's selection of a provider of telecommunications service with the subscriber's authorization verified in accordance with the procedures specified in this part.
( d ) The term *unauthorized carrier* is generally any telecommunications carrier that submits a change, on behalf of a subscriber, in the subscriber's selection of a provider of telecommunications service but fails to obtain the subscriber's authorization verified in accordance with the procedures specified in this part.
( e ) The term *unauthorized change* is a change in a subscriber's selection of a provider of telecommunications service that was made without authorization verified in accordance with the verification procedures specified in this part.
( f ) The term *state commission* shall include any state entity with the state-designated authority to resolve the complaints of such state's residents arising out of an allegation that an unauthorized change of a telecommunication service provider has occurred that has elected, in accordance with the requirements of § 64.1110(a), to administer the Federal Communications Commission's slamming rules and remedies, as enumerated in §§ 64.1100 through 64.1190.
( g ) The term *relevant governmental agency* shall be the state commission if the complainant files a complaint with the state commission or if the complaint is forwarded to the state commission by the Federal Communications Commission, and the Federal Communications Commission if the complainant files a complaint with the Federal Communications Commission, and the complaint is not forwarded to a state commission.
( h ) The term *subscriber* is any one of the following: ( 1 ) The party identified in the account records of a common carrier as responsible for payment of the telephone bill;
( 2 ) Any adult person authorized by such party to change telecommunications services or to charge services to the account; or
( 3 ) Any person contractually or otherwise lawfully authorized to represent such party.
[65 FR 47690, Aug. 3, 2000, as amended at 66 FR 12892, Mar. 1, 2001]
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00129-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF C.M. AND A.M.,

CHILDREN

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 324th District Court

of Tarrant County (324-352851-03)

May 16, 2019

Opinion by Justice Womack

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dana Womack

 Justice Dana Womack
##### 



Exhibit 4(c).7
 CHANGES TO EXECUTIVE AND NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS SINCE 31 MARCH 2006
 Base Salaries of Executive Directors
 Roger Urwin
    
    £820,000Steve Holliday
    
    £600,000 *Steve Lucas
    
    £480,000Nick Winser
    
    £420,000Mike Jesanis
    US
    $880,000Edward Astle
    
    £420,000
 
 *
    
    Salary reviewed and effective on appointment to Deputy Group Chief Executive (1 April 2006). Fees for Non-Executive Directors
 Sir John Parker
    
    £
    500,000Kenneth Harvey
    
    £
    35,000
    
    Plus additional £12,500 for position of Senior Independent DirectorJohn Allan
    
    £
    35,000
    
    Plus additional £12,500 for chairing
the Remuneration Committee *John Grant
    
    £
    35,000Paul Joskow
    
    £
    35,000
    
    Plus additional £12,500 for chairing
the Finance CommitteeStephen Pettit
    
    £
    35,000
    
    Plus additional £12,500 for chairing the Risk and Responsibility CommitteeGeorge Rose
    
    £
    35,000
    
    Plus additional £15,000 for chairing
the Audit CommitteeMaria Richter
    
    £
    35,000
 
 *
    
    Appointed as new chairman of the Remuneration committee on 1 Feb 2006 as John Grant stood down as
chairman.
# EA Certificate Ceases New Applications on Sept 30, 2015

/ Published July 13, 2015

**iCollege Enterprise Architecture Certificate Program Sunset Plan Notification**

The iCollege Enterprise Architecture (EA) Certificate Program, which includes the Architect and Enterprise Architecture certificates, will cease accepting new applications as of September 30, 2015 and has entered a teach-out mode.  For those students who are currently enrolled one or both of the EA certificates the iCollege will offer courses in the EA Certificate Program through the conclusion of AY 2017/18. The iCollege will no longer offer the Defense Enterprise Architecture (DAC), Modeling for Enterprise Architecture (MEA), and Planning and Managing Enterprise Architecture Programs (PMA) courses after  June 30, 2017.  The iCollege encourages students in the EA Certificate Program to complete the core courses in the Architect and Enterprise Architect certificates before the conclusion of AY 2017/18.

Questions should be directed to the iCollege Office of Student Services at iCollegeOSS@ndu.edu or 202-685-6300.