alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 
THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF GLODE HOLDINGS, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1997 AND THE QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY 
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. 
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1997            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1997            DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          1,947                  1,439
<SECURITIES>                                        0                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  25,822                 25,246
<ALLOWANCES>                                    1,870                  2,736
<INVENTORY>                                    13,764                 18,380
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               42,810                 51,181
<PP&E>                                        121,631                157,436
<DEPRECIATION>                                 63,681                 74,107
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                105,133                147,036
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          23,357                 30,095
<BONDS>                                        56,917                304,007
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0                      0
<PREFERRED>                                         0                      0
<COMMON>                                           18                     22
<OTHER-SE>                                     67,253              (179,844)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  105,133                147,036
<SALES>                                       170,941                171,093
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              170,941                171,093
<CGS>                                         115,099                111,609
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 142,113                139,528
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  372                  6,029
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              3,968                 14,154
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                25,232                 11,382
<INCOME-TAX>                                    8,383                  3,956
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   301                    187
<CHANGES>                                           0                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   16,548                  7,239
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0                      0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0                      0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 51.615 Withdrawal of services.

When an incumbent LEC makes a telecommunications service available only to a limited group of customers that have purchased such a service in the past, the incumbent LEC must also make such a service available at wholesale rates to requesting carriers to offer on a resale basis to the same limited group of customers that have purchased such a service in the past.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Hans Boge the Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer ofKlondike Star Mineral Corporation, Inc. (the "Company") in compliance with 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, hereby certify that, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the period ended August 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company. 

  

|   | *Date: October 22, 2007_* | *Signed:* |                                         |
|--------|---------------------------|-----------|-----------------------------------------|
|   |                      |      |                                    |
|   |                      | *Name:*   | *Hans Boge*                             |
|   |                      | *Title:*  | *Chief Executive Officer and principal* |
|   |                      |      | *financial officer*                     |
§ 78.16 Who may sign applications. ( a ) Applications, amendments thereto, and related statements of fact required by the Commission shall be personally signed by the applicant, if the applicant is an individual; by one of the partners, if the applicant is a partnership; by an officer, if the applicant is a corporation; or by a member who is an officer, if the applicant is an unincorporated association. Applications, amendments, and related statements of fact filed on behalf of government entities shall be signed by such duly elected or appointed officials as may be competent to do so under the laws of the applicable jurisdiction.
( b ) Applications, amendments thereto, and related statements of fact required by the Commission may be signed by the applicant's attorney in case of the applicant's physical disability or of his absence from the United States. The attorney shall in that event separately set forth the reasons why the application is not signed by the applicant. In addition, if any matter is stated on the basis of the attorney's belief only (rather than his knowledge), he shall separately set forth his reasons for believing that such statements are true.
( c ) Only the original of applications, amendments, or related statements of fact need be signed; copies may be conformed.
( d ) Applications, amendments, and related statements of fact need not be submitted under oath. Willful false statements made therein, however, are punishable by fine and imprisonment, United States Code, title 18, section 1001, and by appropriate administrative sanctions, including revocation of station license pursuant to section 312(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.
[37 FR 15926, Aug. 8, 1972]
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"22-1391: FRESHUB, INC. v. AMAZON.COM, INC. [OPINION], Precedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"s5CoLlmmA5\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/02-26-2024-22-1391-freshub-inc-v-amazoncom-inc-opinion-22-1391-opinion-2-26-2024_2276014\/\">22-1391: FRESHUB, INC. v. AMAZON.COM, INC. [OPINION], Precedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/02-26-2024-22-1391-freshub-inc-v-amazoncom-inc-opinion-22-1391-opinion-2-26-2024_2276014\/embed\/#?secret=s5CoLlmmA5\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“22-1391: FRESHUB, INC. v. AMAZON.COM, INC. [OPINION], Precedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"s5CoLlmmA5\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"OPINION Posted: FRESHUB, INC. v. AMAZON.COM, INC. [OPINION](pdf) Appeal Number: 22-1391 Origin: DCT Precedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
No. 11-5609.

#### Marshall *v.*Stengel et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8.
S90G0123.

#### UNION CAMP CORPORATION v. SOUTHERN BULK INDUSTRIES, INC.

(388 SE2d 524)

Decided February 21, 1990.

*Brennan, Harris & Rominger, Edward T. Brennan, Mason White,*for appellant.

*Chamlee, Dubus, Sipple & Walter, George H. Chamlee,*for appellee.

Per curiam.

We granted certiorari in this case on the question of whether the complaint stated a claim upon which relief could be granted. That is, is there a claim in tort in favor of one who loses contractual benefits with a third party due to the negligence of another in interfering with the third party’s performance of the contract. In affirming the trial court’s dismissal of the complaint in *Union Camp Corp. v. Southern Bulk Indus.,*193 Ga. App. 90 (386 SE2d 866) (1989), the Court of Appeals properly construed *Byrd v. English,*117 Ga. 191 (43 SE 419) (1903). The case of *Oxford Constr. Co. v. City of Albany,*221 Ga. 872 (148 SE2d 324) (1966) provides no legal support for the contrary result.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
§ 68.354 Numbering and labeling requirements for terminal equipment. ( a ) Terminal equipment and protective circuitry that is subject to a Supplier's Declaration of Conformity or that is certified by a Telecommunications Certification Body shall have labels in a place and manner required by the Administrative Council for Terminal Attachments.
( b ) Terminal equipment labels shall include an identification numbering system in a manner required by the Administrative Council for Terminal Attachments.
( c ) If the Administrative Council for Terminal Attachments chooses to continue the practice of utilizing a designated “FCC” number, it shall include in its labeling requirements a warning that the Commission no longer directly approves or registers terminal equipment.
( d ) Labeling developed for terminal equipment by the Administrative Council on Terminal Attachments shall contain sufficient information for providers of wireline telecommunications, the Federal Communications Commission, and the U.S. Customs Service to carry out their functions, and for consumers to easily identify the responsible party of their terminal equipment. The numbering and labeling scheme shall be nondiscriminatory, creating no competitive advantage for any entity or segment of the industry.
( e ) FCC numbering and labeling requirements existing prior to the effective date of these rules shall remain unchanged until the Administrative Council for Terminal Attachments publishes its numbering and labeling requirements.
[66 FR 7587, Jan. 24, 2001, as amended at 67 FR 57182, Sept. 9, 2002]
No. 11-5585.

#### Edwards *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
No. 11-5454.

#### Villar *v.*Patterson, Warden.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
9 June 2016

374P13-6

#### State v. Marvin Wade Millsaps

1. Defs *Pro Se*Motion for Appropriate Relief

1. Dismissed

2. Defs *Pro Se*Motion to Consider Universal Rights be Reinstated

2. Dismissed

3. Defs *Pro Se*Motion to Proceed *In Forma Pauperis*

3. Allowed

4. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion to Appoint Counsel

4. Dismissed as moot

5. Defs *Pro Se*Motion for Extraordinary Writ

5. Dismissed

6. Defs *Pro Se*Motion to Modify/Vacate Old Age Conviction

6. Dismissed

Ervin, J.,

recused
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 26, 2010 

s1018 

Order 

 

October 26, 2010 

141288 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141288 

 COA: 296225 

Jackson CC: 08-003973-FH 

EDWARD RICHARD BENNETT, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 28, 2010 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### § 73.201 Numerical designation of FM broadcast channels.

The FM broadcast band consists of that portion of the radio frequency spectrum between 88 MHz and 108 MHz. It is divided into 100 channels of 200 kHz each. For convenience, the frequencies available for FM broadcasting (including those assigned to noncommercial educational broadcasting) are given numerical designations which are shown in the table below:

| Frequency (Mc/s) | Channel No. |
| --- | --- |
| 88.1 | 201 |
| 88.3 | 202 |
| 88.5 | 203 |
| 88.7 | 204 |
| 88.9 | 205 |
| 89.1 | 206 |
| 89.3 | 207 |
| 89.5 | 208 |
| 89.7 | 209 |
| 89.9 | 210 |
| 90.1 | 211 |
| 90.3 | 212 |
| 90.5 | 213 |
| 90.7 | 214 |
| 90.9 | 215 |
| 91.1 | 216 |
| 91.3 | 217 |
| 91.5 | 218 |
| 91.7 | 219 |
| 91.9 | 220 |
| 92.1 | 221 |
| 92.3 | 222 |
| 92.5 | 223 |
| 92.7 | 224 |
| 92.9 | 225 |
| 93.1 | 226 |
| 93.3 | 227 |
| 93.5 | 228 |
| 93.7 | 229 |
| 93.9 | 230 |
| 94.1 | 231 |
| 94.3 | 232 |
| 94.5 | 233 |
| 94.7 | 234 |
| 94.9 | 235 |
| 95.1 | 236 |
| 95.3 | 237 |
| 95.5 | 238 |
| 95.7 | 239 |
| 95.9 | 240 |
| 96.1 | 241 |
| 96.3 | 242 |
| 96.5 | 243 |
| 96.7 | 244 |
| 96.9 | 245 |
| 97.1 | 246 |
| 97.3 | 247 |
| 97.5 | 248 |
| 97.7 | 249 |
| 97.9 | 250 |
| 98.1 | 251 |
| 98.3 | 252 |
| 98.5 | 253 |
| 98.7 | 254 |
| 98.9 | 255 |
| 99.1 | 256 |
| 99.3 | 257 |
| 99.5 | 258 |
| 99.7 | 259 |
| 99.9 | 260 |
| 100.1 | 261 |
| 100.3 | 262 |
| 100.5 | 263 |
| 100.7 | 264 |
| 100.9 | 265 |
| 101.1 | 266 |
| 101.3 | 267 |
| 101.5 | 268 |
| 101.7 | 269 |
| 101.9 | 270 |
| 102.1 | 271 |
| 102.3 | 272 |
| 102.5 | 273 |
| 102.7 | 274 |
| 102.9 | 275 |
| 103.1 | 276 |
| 103.3 | 277 |
| 103.5 | 278 |
| 103.7 | 279 |
| 103.9 | 280 |
| 104.1 | 281 |
| 104.3 | 282 |
| 104.5 | 283 |
| 104.7 | 284 |
| 104.9 | 285 |
| 105.1 | 286 |
| 105.3 | 287 |
| 105.5 | 288 |
| 105.7 | 289 |
| 105.9 | 290 |
| 106.1 | 291 |
| 106.3 | 292 |
| 106.5 | 293 |
| 106.7 | 294 |
| 106.9 | 295 |
| 107.1 | 296 |
| 107.3 | 297 |
| 107.5 | 298 |
| 107.7 | 299 |
| 107.9 | 300 |
| | |
| --- | --- |
| **Note:** The frequency 108.0 MHz may be assigned to VOR test stations subject to the condition that interference is not caused to the reception of FM broadcasting stations, present or future. | |

[[28 FR 13623](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/28-FR-13623), Dec. 14, 1963, as amended at [30 FR 4480](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/30-FR-4480), Apr. 7, 1965; [52 FR 10570](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/52-FR-10570), Apr. 2, 1987]
#### § 73.4246 Stereophonic pilot subcarrier use during monophonic programming.

See Report and Order, Docket 19571, FCC 73-680, adopted June 21, 1973. 41 FCC 2d 534; 38 FR 17021, June 28, 1973.

[47 FR 3792, Jan. 27, 1982]
- [Untitled]
- Binder1
[Untitled] 2
[Untitled] 3
EXHIBIT 23



<PAGE>

                            Anderson Associates, LLP

                          Certified Public Accountants
                                7621 Fitch Lane
                           Baltimore, Maryland 21236
                                  410-882-8050



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




         As independent  auditors, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report, dated December 2, 1999,  incorporated by reference in this annual report
of WHG Bancshares  Corporation on Form 10KSB, into the Corporation's  previously
filed Form S-8 Registration Statement File No. 333-34659.



/s/Anderson Associates LLP

Baltimore, Maryland
December 21, 1999
§ 90.767 Construction and implementation of EA and Regional licenses. ( a ) An EA or Regional licensee must construct a sufficient number of base stations (*i.e.*, base stations for land mobile and/or paging operations) to provide coverage to at least one-third of the population of its EA or REAG within five years of the issuance of its initial license and at least two-thirds of the population of its EA or REAG within ten years of the issuance of its initial license. Licensees may, in the alternative, provide substantial service to their licensed areas at the appropriate five- and ten-year benchmarks.
( b ) Licensees must notify the Commission in accordance with § 1.946 of this chapter of compliance with the Construction requirements of paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) Failure by an EA or Regional licensee to meet the construction requirements of paragraph (a) of this section, as applicable, will result in automatic cancellation of its entire EA or Regional license. In such instances, EA or Regional licenses will not be converted to individual, site-by-site authorizations for already constructed stations.
( d ) EA and Regional licensees will not be permitted to count the resale of the services of other providers in their EA or REAG, e.g., incumbent, Phase I licensees, to meet the construction requirement of paragraph (a) of this section, as applicable.
( e ) EA and Regional licensees will not be required to construct and place in operation, or commence service on, all of their authorized channels at all of their base stations or fixed stations.
[69 FR 75172, Dec. 15, 2004]
§ 69.120 Line information database. ( a ) A charge that is expressed in dollars and cents per query shall be assessed upon all carriers that access validation information from a local exchange carrier database to recover the costs of: ( 1 ) The transmission facilities between the local exchange carrier's signalling transfer point and the database; and
( 2 ) The signalling transfer point facilities dedicated to the termination of the transmission facilities connecting the database to the exchange carrier's signalling network.
( b ) A charge that is expressed in dollars and cents per query shall be assessed upon all carriers that access validation information from a local exchange carrier line information database to recover the costs of the database.
[57 FR 24380, June 9, 1992]
No. 11-1192.

#### One 1998 GMC et al. *v.*Illinois.

Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.
CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
 CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of American
Wagering, Inc. for the year ended January 31, 2005, I certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:
 
 (1) the
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of American Wagering, Inc. for the year ended
January 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
    the
      information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year
      ended January 31, 2005, fairly presents in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of American Wagering,
      Inc.
 
 By:
    /s/ Victor
      SalernoName:
    Victor
      SalernoTitle:
    Chief
      Executive OfficerDate:
    April
      29, 2005By:
    /s/ Timothy F. LockingerName:
    Timothy
      F. LockingerTitle:
    Chief
      Financial OfficerDate:
    April
      29, 2005
 
 
 1
#### § 80.465 Assignment and use of frequencies for telephony.

Subpart H of this part lists the frequencies available for assignment to public coast stations for telephony operations.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from balance
sheets and statements of operations and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          17,146
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,251
<ALLOWANCES>                                       875
<INVENTORY>                                     31,799
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                82,987
<PP&E>                                          51,138
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,267
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 244,932
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           61,684
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           554
<OTHER-SE>                                   (172,667)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   172,113
<SALES>                                        263,134
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               263,134
<CGS>                                          132,535
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  215,998
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,204
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,932
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,243
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,689
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,689
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>