alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H.F.| No. 522

Approved 12 1965

Governor of the State of Mixnesota. :
Filed Fear SB 1965 cae

cretary of the State of Minnesota.



208 GOODLATTE, Virginia JERROLD NADLER, New York
CHAIRMAN, RANKING MINORITY MEMBER

G.S. House of Representatives

Committee on the Judiciary

Washington, BC 20515-6216
One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

August 9, 2018

The Honorable Karen Haas

Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives
U.S. Capitol, Room H154

Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Madam Clerk,

Pursuant to section 3(c) of House Resolution 5 (114" Congress), I hereby designate the attached
Memorial from the State of Minnesota, received by the House of Representatives in the year 1965, as
purporting to be an application of the State legislature calling for a convention for proposing amendments
to the Constitution of the United States pursuant to Article V, and request that you make it publicly
available.

Sincerely,

bgt follle

‘ob Goodlatte
Chairman


H.F, No. 522

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION . <3

MEMORIALIZING THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED
STATES TO CALL A CONVENTION TO PROPOSE
AN AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES
CONSTITUTION RELATING TO APPORTIONMENT

OF STATE LEGISLATURES.

|
IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the Legislature of ‘the |
State of Minnesota that the Congress of the United States.
is requested to call a Convention for the single purpoge of
proposing the following article as an amendment to the
Constitution of the United States:
"Article
"Section 1. Nothing in this Constitution
shall prohibit any state which shall have a
bicameral legislature from apportioning the
membership of one house of such legislature on
factors other than population, provided that the
pian of such apportionment shall have been
submitted to and approved by a vote of the
electorate of that state. ;
"Sec. 2. Nothing in this Constitution shall
restrict or limit a state in its determination of |
how membership of governing bodies of its |

subordinate units shall be apportioned.

"Sec. 3. This article shall be inoperative

unless it shall have been ratified as an |
amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures

of three-fourths of the. Several States within

|
|
|
seven years from the date of its submission to che
States by the Congress."
|
e

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that if Congress shall hav

proposed an amendment to the Constitution identical with
|


H.F.| No.

that contained in this resolution prior to June 1, 1965),
this application for a Convention shall no longer be of |

any force or effect.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Secretary of State

transmit. copies of this resolution to the Secretary of the

Senate of the United States, the Clerk of the House of |

Representatives of the United States and to each member of

the Congress from the State of Minnesota.

Speaker of the House of RepreSentativ

Ahi Kak

President of the Senate.

Passed the House of Representatives this fifth day of May
in the year of Our Lord one thousand nine hundred and
Sixty-five.

oY. - ; -“?
Chief Clerk, Housé of es

Passed the Senate this sixth day of May in the yea:
Our Lord one thousand nine hundred and sixty-five.

erdvaty of the Sehate.

522
# **EXHIBIT31.1        Section 302Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

**I, Gregg E. Hunter,Chief Executive Officer, Commercial National Financial Corporationcertify that:**

****

I have reviewed this annual reporton Form 10-K of Commercial National FinancialCorporation;

****

Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;

****

Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

****

The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant andwe have:

****

designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls or procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

****

evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and

****

disclosed in this report any changein the registrant's internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;and

****

****

The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and to the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

****

all significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controlover financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and

****

any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financialinformation.

****

****
| Date:  March 29,2005 | By: | /s/ Gregg E.Hunter     |
|---------------------------|-----|------------------------|
|                           |     | Gregg E. Hunter        |
|                           |     | Chief ExecutiveOfficer |
§ 76.985 Subscriber bill itemization. ( a ) Cable operators may identify as a separate line item of each regular subscriber bill the following: ( 1 ) The amount of the total bill assessed as a franchise fee and the identity of the franchising authority to which the fee is paid.
( 2 ) The amount of the total bill assessed to satisfy any requirements imposed on the cable operator by the franchise agreement to support public, educational, or governmental channels or the use of such channels.
( 3 ) The amount of any other fee, tax, assessment, or charge of any kind imposed by any governmental authority on the transaction between the operator and the subscriber. In order for a governmental fee or assessment to be separately identified under this section, it must be directly imposed by a governmental body on a transaction between a subscriber and an operator.
( b ) The charge identified on the subscriber bill as the total charge for cable service should include all fees and costs itemized pursuant to this section.
( c ) Local franchising authorities may adopt regulations consistent with this section.
[58 FR 29753, May 21, 1993, as amended at 76 FR 55818, Sept. 9, 2011; 83 FR 60776, Nov. 27, 2018]
§ 95.579 FRS unwanted emissions limits. Each FRS transmitter type must be designed to satisfy the applicable unwanted emissions limits in this paragraph. ( a ) *Attenuation requirements.* The power of unwanted emissions must be attenuated below the carrier power output in Watts (P) by at least: ( 1 ) 25 dB (decibels) in the frequency band 6.25 kHz to 12.5 kHz removed from the channel center frequency.
( 2 ) 35 dB in the frequency band 12.5 kHz to 31.25 kHz removed from the channel center frequency.
( 3 ) 43 + 10 log (P) dB in any frequency band removed from the channel center frequency by more than 31.25 kHz.
( b ) *Measurement bandwidths.* The power of unwanted emissions in the frequency bands specified in paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section is measured with a reference bandwidth of 300 Hz. The power of unwanted emissions in the frequency range specified in paragraph (a)(3) is measured with a reference bandwidth of at least 30 kHz.
( c ) *Measurement conditions.* The requirements in this section apply to each FRS transmitter type both with and without the connection of permitted attachments, such as an external speaker, microphone and/or power cord.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4948 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4948

_______________________________________________________________________

                  IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

            October 5 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

                                Received

            October 8 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

     Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate Building Number 137 of the Tuscaloosa Veterans' Medical 
 Center in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, as the ``Claude Harris, Jr. Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    Building Number 137 of the Tuscaloosa Veterans' Medical Center in 
Tuscaloosa, Alabama, shall be known and designated as the ``Claude 
Harris, Jr. Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Claude Harris, Jr. 
Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 4, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA 

FIFTH DISTRICT 

 

 NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

 DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED 

 

RONALD PHILIPS, 

 Appellant, 

v. Case No. 5D15-338 

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, 

 Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Opinion filed March 24, 2016 

Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Marion County, 

Robert W. Hodges, Judge. 

Ronald Philips, Masaryktown, pro se. 

David W. Rodstein, of Padula Hodkin, 

PLLC, Boca Raton, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM 

Ronald Philips ("Appellant") appeals the trial court's entry of final judgment of 

foreclosure in favor of Nationstar Mortgage, LLC ("Nationstar"). Appellant raises 

several issues on appeal. We affirm as to all, except for the final judgment's inclusion of 

awards regarding specific expenses for which there was no proof. Appellant asserts 

that there was no evidence presented by Nationstar during the non-jury trial to justify the 

inclusion of the amounts listed in the final judgment for hazard insurance, property 
2

inspections, attorney’s fees, filing fees, service fees, title search costs, and statutory 

mailing fees. Commendably, Nationstar concedes this point. We agree that it was error 

to include those amounts in the final judgment. "[A]ppellate courts do not generally 

provide parties with an opportunity to retry their case upon a failure of proof." Wolkoff v. 

Am. Home Mortg. Servicing, Inc., 153 So. 3d 280, 283 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (alteration in 

original) (quoting Correa v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n, 118 So. 2d 952, 956 (Fla. 2d DCA 

2013)). Therefore, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand with instructions for 

the trial court to enter an amended final judgment in favor of Nationstar, which shall 

exclude any amounts for hazard insurance, property inspections, attorney’s fees, filing 

fees, service fees, title search costs, and statutory mailing fees, but will otherwise be in 

accordance with the original final judgment. 

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, REMANDED WITH 

INSTRUCTIONS 

PALMER, TORPY, AND EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
No. 11-6159.

#### Berry *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4957

To amend the Railway Labor Act concerning the applicability of requirements

of that Act to United States air carriers and flight crews engaged

in flight operations outside the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 12, 1994

Mr. RAHALL (for himself, Mr. BORSKI, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. COPPERSMITH, Mr.

COSTELLO, and Mr. DE LUGO) introduced the following bill; which was

referred to the Committee on Public Works and Transportation

A BILL

To amend the Railway Labor Act concerning the applicability

of requirements of that Act to United States air carriers

and flight crews engaged in flight operations outside

the United States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY OF RAILWAY LABOR ACT PRO4 VISIONS TO AIR CARRIERS AND FLIGHT

5 CREWS OPERATING OUTSIDE THE UNITED

6 STATES.

7 (a) FOREIGN COMMERCE.—Section 201 of the Rail8 way Labor Act (45 U.S.C. 181) is amended by adding at
2

•HR 4957 IH

1 the end the following: ‘‘As used in this title, the term ‘for2 eign commerce’ includes flight operations (excluding

3 ground operations performed by persons other than flight

4 crew members) conducted in whole or in part outside the

5 United States (as defined by section 40102(a)(41) of title

6 49, United States Code) by an air carrier (as defined by

7 section 40102(a)(2) of such title).’’.

8 (b) EMPLOYEE.—Section 202 of such Act (45 U.S.C.

9 182) is amended by adding at the end the following: ‘‘As

10 used in this title, the term ‘employee’ also includes flight

11 crew members employed by an air carrier (as defined by

12 section 40102(a)(2) of title 49, United States Code) while

13 such flight crew members perform work in whole or in part

14 outside the United States (as defined by section

15 40102(a)(41) of such title).’’.

Æ
(Translated
      From Chinese by the H.J.M. International Law Office)


    Corn
      Kernels Purchase Agreement 

     

    Buyer:
      Xinjiang Yajia Distillate Company Limited. (Herein after referred to
as Party
      A)



     

    Seller:
      Xinjiang Yili Agricultural No. 4 Troop and 61 Division Supply and Sales Company
      (Herein
      after referred to as Party B)

     

    
      	I.	
              Party
                A is an ethanol producer with an annual production capacity of
                20-30 thousand
                tons and it needs 8-10 million tons of corn kernels as raw material
                every
                year. Due to the production needs, Party A decides to purchase corn
                kernels from Party B herein, and the supply term for this contract
                is five
                years. 

            


    

    


    
      	II.	
              Party
                B must supply enough quantity of corn to Party A at a discounted
                market
                price.

            


    

    


    
      	III.	
              Delivery
                location: to be discussed by both
                parties.

            


    

    


    
      	IV.	
              This
                contract is in four duplicated copies, two copies for both parties,
                each
                copy has the same effect.

            


    

    


    
      	V.	
              This
                agreement will be valid after signed by the legal representatives
                or
                authorized persons from both parties with their company seals. Within
                three months
                after
                the
                agreement takes effect, the two parties need to sign a formal purchase
                contract, otherwise, this agreement will be voided
                automatically.

            


    

     

     

    Party
      A: Xinjiang Yajia Distillate Company Limited. (Seal) 

     

    Legal
      representative: ___________________________________ (Signature) 

     

    Authorized
      representative: ___________________________________ (Signature) 

     

    Date:
      December 29, 2006 

     

     

    Party
      B: Xinjiang Yili Agricultural No. 4 Troop and 61 Division Supply and Sales
      Company (Seal) 

     

    Legal
      representative: ___________________________________ (Signature) 

     

    Authorized
      representative: ___________________________________ (Signature) 

     

    Date:
      December 29, 2006
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of ArthroCare Corporation (the
Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



1. The accompanying annual report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |     |  |                                                                   
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 29, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/    FERNANDO
SANCHEZ                                           
|                     |  |     |  | Fernando Sanchez Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into
any filing of the Company, whether made before of after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1091 MARY F. BEARD, Widow of Boyd T. Beard, Petitioner, versus UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (05-945-BLA; 04-6291-BLA) Submitted: July 20, 2007 Decided: August 16, 2007 Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry L. Rowe, Kelly Elswick-Hall, LARRY L. ROWE, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, Charleston, West Virginia, for Petitioner. Howard G. Salisbury, Jr., KAY CASTO & CHANEY PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Respondent United States Steel. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Mary F. Beard, widow of Boyd T. Beard, seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the Board. Beard v. U.S. Steel Corp. , Nos. 05-945-BLA; 04-6291-BLA (BRB Aug. 14, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Hans Boge, certify that: 1.      I have reviewed this quarterly    report on Form 10-QSB of Klondike Star Mineral Corporation, Inc.; 2.      Based on my knowledge, this    quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or    omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 3.      Based on my knowledge, the    financial statements, and other financial information included in this    annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial    condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and    for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 4.      I am responsible for establishing    and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange    Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:   a)designed such disclosure controls and    procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,    including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others    within those entities, particularly during the period in which this    quarterly report is being prepared;   b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's    disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the    filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and   c)presented in this quarterly report our    conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and    procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 5.      I have disclosed, based on our most    recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of    registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent    functions):   a)all significant deficiencies in the design or    operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's    ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have    identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal    controls; and   b)any fraud, whether or not material, that    involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant's internal controls; and  6.      I have indicated in this annual    report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or    in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls    subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any    corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material    weaknesses.  
 
 *Date: January 13, 2005**Signed:**Hans Boge*      *Name:**Hans Boge*  *Title:**Chief Executive Officer and principal*   *financial officer*