alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 167 (Tuesday, August 29, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 51274]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7213]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Transit Administration

[Docket No. FTA-2005-22657]
RIN 2132-AA85


Charter Service Negotiated Rulemaking Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration (FTA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of meeting location and time of the meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice lists the location and time of the next Charter 
Bus Negotiated Rulemaking Advisory Committee (CBNRAC) meeting.

DATES: August 29, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Martineau, Attorney-Advisor, 
Office of the Chief Counsel, Federal Transit Administration, 202-366-
1936 (<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4f2a2326352e2d2a3b2761222e3d3b26212a2e3a0f2b203b61282039"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="66030a0f1c070403120e480b0714120f080307132602091248010910">[email protected]</span></a>). Her mailing address at the Federal 
Transit Administration is 400 Seventh Street, SW., Room 9316, 
Washington, DC 20590.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Meeting Location

    The Radisson Hotel, 2020 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 
22202 (Crystal City).

Meeting Time

September 12, 9 a.m.-4:30 p.m.
September 13, 8:30 a.m.-4 p.m.

    Issued this 23rd day of August, 2006, in Washington DC,
James S. Simpson,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 06-7213 Filed 8-28-06; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 4911-57-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 80.1051 Scope.

This subpart describes the technical and performance requirements for EPIRB stations.

[73 FR 4488, Jan. 25, 2008]
FORM 15. Informal Opening Brief (Secretary of Veterans Affairs Cases Under 38 U.S.C. § 502) Form 15 (p. 1) 

July 2020

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

INFORMAL BRIEF OF PETITIONER

Case Number:

Short Case Caption:

Name of Petitioner:

Instructions: Read the Guide for Unrepresented Parties before completing this 

form. Answer the questions as best as you can. Attach additional pages as needed 

to answer the questions. This form and continuation pages may not exceed 30 

pages.

Attach a copy of the action or regulation of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs that is 

subject to judicial review. You may also attach other record material as an 

appendix. Any attached material should be referenced in answer to the below 

questions. Please redact (erase, cover, or otherwise make unreadable) social 

security numbers or comparable private personal identifiers that appear in any 

attachments you submit.

1. Have you ever had another case in this court? Yes No

If yes, state the name and number of each case.

2. What actions of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs do you want reviewed by this

court?
FORM 15. Informal Opening Brief (Secretary of Veterans Affairs Cases Under 38 U.S.C. § 502) Form 15 (p. 2) 

July 2020

3. Do you want this court to review any regulations of the Secretary of Veterans

Affairs? Yes No

If yes, which regulations?

4. What errors of fact or law are found in the Secretary’s action or regulations?

Explain in detail.

5. Have you exhausted the administrative remedies available? Yes No

Explain in detail all the steps you have taken within the Department of

Veterans Affairs to obtain the relief you are seeking.
FORM 15. Informal Opening Brief (Secretary of Veterans Affairs Cases Under 38 U.S.C. § 502) Form 15 (p. 3) 

July 2020

6. What action do you want this court to take in this case?

Date: _________________ Signature:

Name:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 3 AND 4 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          47,763
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               130,910
<PP&E>                                         150,052
<DEPRECIATION>                                (51,803)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 229,159
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,808
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,128
<OTHER-SE>                                     199,223
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   229,159
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                (492,619)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (491,780)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (491,780)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (491,780)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04


</TABLE>
§ 73.683 Presumptive determination of field strength at individual locations. ( a ) See § 73.619(c). For purposes of the cross-reference from § 90.307(b), the Grade B contour is defined as the F(50,50) contour at 64 dBu.
( b ) - ( c ) [Reserved]
( d ) For purposes of determining the eligibility of individual households for satellite retransmission of distant network signals under the copyright law provisions of 17 U.S.C. 119(d)(10)(A), field strength shall be determined by the Individual Location Longley-Rice (ILLR) propagation prediction model. Such eligibility determinations shall consider only the signals of network stations located in the subscriber's Designated Market Area. Guidance for use of the ILLR model in predicting the field strength of television signals for such determinations is provided in OET Bulletin No. 73. For availability of OET Bulletin No. 73, contact FCC (see § 73.8000 for contact information).
( e ) If a location was predicted to be unserved by a local network station using a version of the ILLR model specified in OET Bulletin No. 72 or OET Bulletin No. 73, as appropriate, and the satellite subscriber at that location is receiving a distant signal affiliated with the same network from its satellite provider, the satellite subscriber shall remain eligible for receiving the distant signal from its satellite provider if that location is subsequently predicted to be served by the local station due to either a change in the ILLR model or a change in the station's operations that change its coverage.
( f ) A satellite carrier is exempt from the verification requirements of 47 U.S.C. 339(c)(4)(A) with respect to a test requested by a satellite subscriber to whom the retransmission of the signals of local broadcast stations is available under 47 U.S.C. 338 from such carrier. The definitions of satellite carrier, subscriber, and local market contained in 47 CFR 76.66(a) apply to this paragraph (f).
[44 FR 36039, June 20, 1979, as amended at 47 FR 35990, Aug. 18, 1982; 50 FR 23699, June 5, 1985; 50 FR 32416, Aug. 12, 1985; 65 FR 36641, June 9, 2000; 70 FR 21670, Apr. 27, 2005; 75 FR 80363, Dec. 22, 2010; 85 FR 64408, Oct. 13, 2020; 88 FR 21446, Apr. 10, 2023; 89 FR 7252, Feb. 1, 2024]
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant

Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Matrix Service Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas E. Long, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: September 28, 2010



|                                                                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                     
|/s/ Thomas E. Long
________________________________________
Thomas E. Long
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



| |  |  |  | 
| |  |  |  | 
| |  |  |  |
No. 11-9898.

#### Jiminez *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 80.1009 Principal operator and operating position.

The principal operating position of the bridge-to-bridge station must be the vessel's navigational bridge or, in the case of dredges, its main control station. If the radiotelephone installation can be operated from any location other than the principal operating position, the principal operating position must be able to take full control of the installation.
No. 11-1333.

#### Davenport *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 99.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned officer of US SEARCH.com Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: May 15, 2003 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    JEFFREY R. WATTS
|------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                        



The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
§ 87.301 Supplemental eligibility. ( a ) The following entities are eligible for flight test station licenses: ( 1 ) Manufacturers of aircraft or major aircraft components;
( 2 ) A parent corporation or its subsidiary if either corporation is a manufacturer of aircraft or major aircraft components; or
( 3 ) Educational institutions and persons primarily engaged in the design, development, modification, and flight test evaluation of aircraft or major aircraft components.
( b ) Each application must include a certification sufficient to establish the applicant's eligibility under the criteria in paragraph (a) of this section.
[53 FR 28940, Aug. 1, 1988, as amended at 63 FR 68957, Dec. 14, 1998]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Community Bank Corporation of America (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Kenneth P. Cherven, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |     |  |                                                          
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 13, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ Kenneth P. Cherven                                   
|                      |  |     |  | Kenneth P. Cherven, President and Chief Executive Officer
Editorial Note on Part 74
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 74 appear at 64 FR 4055, Jan. 27, 1999.

§ 74.1237 Antenna location. ( a ) An applicant for a new station to be authorized under this subpart or for a change in the facilities of such a station shall endeavor to select a site which will provide a line-of-sight transmission path to the entire area intended to be served and at which there is available a suitable signal from the primary station. The transmitting antenna should be placed above growing vegetation and trees lying in the direction of the area intended to be served, to minimize the possiblity of signal absorption by foliage.
( b ) Consideration should be given to accessibility of the site at all seasons of the year and to the availability of facilities for the maintenance and operation of the FM translator.
( c ) Consideration should be given to the existence of strong radiofrequency fields from other transmitters at the translator site and the possibility that such fields may result in the retransmission of signals originating on frequencies other than that of the primary station.
( d ) The transmitting antenna of an FM booster station shall be located within the protected contour of its primary station, subject to Note, § 74.1231 (h). The transmitting antenna of a commonly owned commercial FM translator station shall be located within the protected contour of its commercial primary FM station.
( e ) Where an FM translator or booster licensee or permittee proposes to mount its antenna on or near an AM tower, as defined in § 1.30002, the FM translator or booster licensee or permittee must comply with § 1.30003 or § 1.30002.
[35 FR 15388, Oct. 2, 1970, as amended at 55 FR 50698, Dec. 10, 1990; 58 FR 42026, Aug. 6, 1993; 62 FR 51063, Sept. 30, 1997; 78 FR 66298, Nov. 5, 2013]
HaldorTopsoe, Inc. Response to EPA's Section 114 Request August 23, 2010 (CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT)
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAeronautical Engineering: A Continuing BibliographyThis supplemental issue of Aeronautical Engineering, A Continuing Bibliography with Indexes (NASA/SP#2000-7037) lists reports, articles, and other documents recently announced in the NASA STI Database. The coverage includes documents on the engineering and theoretical aspects of design, construction, evaluation, testing, operation, and performance of aircraft (including aircraft engines) and associated components, equipment, and systems. It also includes research and development in aerodynamics, aeronautics, and ground support equipment for aeronautical vehicles.Document ID20000117687Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeOther - BibliographyDate AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 2000Subject CategoryAeronautics (General)Report/Patent NumberNAS 1.21:7037/SUPPL421NASA/SP-2000-7037/SUPPL421Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20000117687.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-15-00154-CR

Frank Henderson Brown, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-14-200998, HONORABLE CLIFFORD A. BROWN, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

The reporter’s record in this cause was originally due April 5, 2015. On the court

reporter’s requests, the deadline for filing the reporter’s record was extended to October 23. The

reporter has now submitted a fourth request asking that the Court extend the time for filing the

reporter’s record to November 30. We grant court reporter Kimberly Lee’s request and order her

to file the reporter’s record no later than November 30. No further extensions will be granted, and

failure to comply with this order will result in Ms. Lee being required to appear before this Court

and show cause why she should not be held in contempt and have sanctions imposed.

It is so ordered November 6, 2015.

Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Bourland

Do Not Publish
#### § 65.304 Capital structure.

The proportion of each cost of capital component in the capital structure is equal to:

Proportion in the capital structure =

[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER01JN95.002/ER01JN95.002_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER01JN95.002/ER01JN95.002_original_size.png)

Where:

“Book Value of particular component” is the total of the book values of that component for all local exchange carriers with annual revenues equal to or above the indexed revenue threshold as defined in [§ 32.9000](/on/2024-09-20/title-47/section-32.9000).

“Book Value of Debt + Book Value of Preferred Stock + Book Value of Equity” is the total of the book values of all the components for all local exchange carriers with annual revenues equal to or above the indexed revenue threshold as defined in [§ 32.9000](/on/2024-09-20/title-47/section-32.9000).

The total of all proportions shall equal 1.00.

[[60 FR 28545](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/60-FR-28545), June 1, 1995, as amended at [67 FR 5702](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/67-FR-5702), Feb. 6, 2002]
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

MAR 10, 2010

JOHN LEY

 CLERK

[PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 08-12199

 

(D.C. Docket No. 06-00860-CV-CG-M)

DAVID W. CORBITT,

ALEXANDER J. RAYA, JR.,

 Plaintiff-Appellants,

 

versus

HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.,

 Defendant-Appellee.

 

---------------------------

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Alabama

--------------------------

(Opinion December 4, 2009, 589 F.3d 1136, 11 Cir. 2009)

th

(March 10, 2010)

Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, BIRCH, BLACK, CARNES,

BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON, PRYOR, and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

B Y T H E C O U R T :

A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this

case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges in this Court

in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The

previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-08-0737

SAT Date: 9/30/2008

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1-2 1

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

 3 1 1

Exposure Based Review:

Health:

Ecotox:

Routes of exposure: Health: Inhalation only.

Ecotox: No releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: LUNG IMMUNO IRR-E SKIN

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-08-0737

FATE: 

Solid with MP = Dec. 200 EC (M)

S = 11.7 mg/L at 25 EC (M)

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 EC (E)

BP > 400 EC (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg > mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong

PBT Potential: P3B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

 Health:

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 2
 Health Summary: Absorption is nil through the skin and poor through the 

lungs and GI tract based on physical/chemical properties and analogs. This material is reported 

to be in the respirable range and an average size of 3 microns with essentially all of the particles 

under 10 microns. There is concern for lung overload and possible immunotoxicity based on 

poorly soluble respirable particles. The MSDS warns for mechanical eye irritation and drying of 

the skin. Low moderate concern.

 Ecotox:

Test 

Organism

Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 *

daphnid 48-h LC50 *

green algal 96-h EC50 *

fish _ chronic value *

daphnid _ chronic value *

algal _ chronic value *

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge Chronic Value

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for SAR 

chemical class = ; MW >100,000 with 0% <1000; solid; S 

= 47 mg/L at 20 C (P); pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and 

nominal concentrations; DW hardness < 150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and DW TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

*

SARs

SAR Class

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: Becky Jones

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 2