alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 74

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 74 appear at 64 FR 4055, Jan. 27, 1999.

#### § 74.801 Definitions.

*600 MHz duplex gap.* An 11 megahertz guard band at 652-663 MHz that separates part 27 600 MHz service uplink and downlink frequencies.

*600 MHz guard band.* Designated frequency band at 614-617 MHz that prevents interference between licensed services in the 600 MHz service band and channel 37.

*600 MHz service band.* Frequencies in the 617-652 MHz and 663-698 MHz bands that are reallocated and reassigned for 600 MHz band services under part 27.

*Cable television system operator.* A cable television operator is defined in § 76.5(cc) of the rules.

*Large venue owner or operator.* Large venue owner or operator refers to a person or organization that owns or operates a venue that routinely uses 50 or more low power auxiliary station devices, where the use of such devices is an integral part of major events or productions. Routinely using 50 or more low power auxiliary station devices means that the venue owner or operator uses 50 or more such devices for most events or productions.

*Low power auxiliary station.* An auxiliary station authorized and operated pursuant to the provisions set forth in this subpart. Devices authorized as low power auxiliary stations are intended to transmit over distances of approximately 100 meters for uses such as wireless microphones, cue and control communications, and synchronization of TV camera signals.

*Motion picture producer.* Motion picture producer refers to a person or organization engaged in the production or filming of motion pictures.

*Professional sound company.* Professional sound company refers to a person or organization that provides audio services that routinely use 50 or more low power auxiliary station devices, where the use of such devices is an integral part of major events or productions. Routinely using 50 or more low power auxiliary station devices means that the professional sound company uses 50 or more such devices for most events or productions.

*Spectrum Act.* Title VI of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 (Pub. L. 112-96).

*Television program producer.* Television program producer refers to a person or organization engaged in the production of television programs.

*Wireless assist video device.* An auxiliary station authorized and operated by motion picture and television program producers pursuant to the provisions of this subpart. These stations are intended to transmit over distances of approximately 300 meters for use as an aid in composing camera shots on motion picture and television sets.

(Sec. 5, 48 Stat. 1068; 47 U.S.C. 155)

[42 FR 14729, Mar. 16, 1977, as amended at 43 FR 14662, Apr. 7, 1978; 51 FR 4603, Feb. 6, 1986; 51 FR 9966, Mar. 24, 1986; 54 FR 41842, Oct. 12, 1989; 68 FR 12772, Mar. 17, 2003; 79 FR 40689, July 14, 2014; 80 FR 71728, Nov. 17, 2015; 82 FR 41559, Sept. 1, 2017]
No. 11-5760.

#### Ogunsalu *v.*Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division One, et al.

Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.
Ex-4.19.2 Acceptance of Offer dated Feb 21, 2006



 





Exhibit 4.19.2




[Chartered’s Logo and address]




Date: 21st February 2006




Terra Investment Pte Ltd

Blk 750 Oasis, Chai Chee Road

Technopark @ Chai Chee #01-01

Singapore 499000



Attention: Mr Kenneth Tham



Dear Kenneth,



OFFER OF LEASE OF LAND KNOWN AS PRIVATE LOT A1964510 AT PLOT 6 WOODLANDS INDUSTIRAL PARK D IN
WOODLANDS WAFER FAB PARK (“the Land”)



This letter serves to confirm that the terms and conditions set forth in JTC’s Offer Letter dated
16 February 2006 in respect to the subject matter are acceptable to us. Thus, please kindly proceed
to accept the Offer Letter on Friday, 24th February 2006.



At the same time, we will arrange for the payment in a total amount of $619,245.50 to be wire
transferred to your bank account on Thursday, 23rd February 2006 so that you could
prepare the cheque in the same amount to JTC accordingly.



Thank you for your assistance.



Yours truly,




/s/ Ang Tang Yong

VP, Fab Support Operations

CHARTERED SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING LTD
§ 80.1155 Radioprinter. Radioprinter operations provide record communications between authorized maritime mobile stations. ( a ) *Supplementary eligibility requirements.* Ships must be less than 1600 gross tons.
( b ) *Scope of communication.* ( 1 ) Ship radioprinter communications may be conducted with an associated private coast station.
( 2 ) Ships authorized to communicate by radioprinter with a common private coast station may also conduct intership radioprinter operations.
( 3 ) Only those communications which are associated with the business and operational needs of the ship are authorized.
( c ) *Assignment and use of frequencies.* ( 1 ) Frequencies for radioprinter operations are shared by several radio services including the maritime mobile service.
( 2 ) Ship stations must conduct radioprinter operations only on frequencies assigned to their associated private coast station for that purpose.
( d ) *Authorization procedure.* The authorization procedure for ship station radioprinter operations is as follows: ( 1 ) The associated private coast station must submit an application for specific radioprinter frequencies and provide the names of ships to be served.
( 2 ) When the private coast station receives a radioprinter license, it must provide copies of their license to all ships with which they are authorized to conduct radioprinter operations. The private coast station license copy must be kept as part of the ship station license.
( 3 ) Any addition or deletion of ships must be notified to the Commission by letter.
Editorial Note on Part 74
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 74 appear at 64 FR 4055, Jan. 27, 1999.

§ 74.750 Transmission system facilities. ( a ) A low power TV or TV translator station shall operate with a transmitter that is either certificated for licensing under the provisions of this subpart or type notified for use under part 73 of this chapter.
( b ) External preamplifiers also may be used provided that they do not cause improper operation of the transmitting equipment, and use of such preamplifiers is not necessary to meet the provisions of § 74.795(b).
( c ) through ( d ) [Reserved]
( e ) The following procedures shall apply: ( 1 ) Any manufacturer of apparatus intended for use at low power TV or TV translator stations may request certification by following the procedures set forth in part 2, subpart J, of this chapter.
( 2 ) Low power TV and TV translator transmitting apparatus that has been certificated by the FCC will normally be authorized without additional measurements from the applicant or licensee.
( 3 ) Applications for certification of modulators to be used with existing certificated TV translator apparatus must include the specifications electrical and mechanical interconnecting requirements for the apparatus with which it is designed to be used.
( 4 ) Other rules concerning certification, including information regarding withdrawal of type acceptance, modification of certificated equipment, and limitations on the findings upon which certification is based, are set forth in part 2, subpart J, of this chapter.
( f ) The transmitting antenna system may be designed to produce horizontal, elliptical, or circular polarization.
( g ) Low power TV or TV translator stations installing new certificated transmitting apparatus incorporating modulating equipment need not make equipment performance measurements and shall so indicate on the station license application. Stations adding new or replacing modulating equipment in existing low power TV or TV translator station transmitting apparatus must have a qualified person examine the transmitting system after installation. A report of the methods, measurements, and results must be kept in the station records. However, stations installing modulating equipment solely for the limited local origination of signals permitted by § 74.790 need not comply with the requirements of this paragraph (g).
[88 FR 30669, May 12, 2023]
Keene District Court

No. 81-073

#### *In re*Arnold H.

August 10, 1981

*Gregory H. Smith,*attorney general *(Betsy S. Westgate,*assistant attorney general, on the brief and orally), for the State.

*Edward J. O’Brien,*county attorney, by brief and orally, for Cheshire County.

*Charles H. Morang,*city attorney *(David S. Park,*assistant city attorney, on the brief and orally), for the City of Keene.

Memorandum Opinion

The Youth Development Center (YDC) appeals from a decision of the Keene District Court *(Davis,*J.) that would hold the YDC or the State responsible for all costs associated with the placement of a juvenile in a group foster home by the YDC under the authority granted it in RSA 621:17. It is the State’s position that should such a placement be made, the City of Keene is responsible for those costs.

The juvenile is fifteen years old, however, and RSA 621:16 (prior to June 30, 1981) provides that:

> “Minors under the age of seventeen committed to the center under the provisions of RSA 169, *shall not be subject to the provisions hereof relative to release, trial placement, parole and discharge,*though they shall be subject to the treatment hereinafter provided for incorrigibles until such time as their cases are disposed of by the court.”

(Emphasis added.) (Recently amended version to appear in RSA 621:18 (Supp. 1981), effective June 30, 1981.) Under this statutory provision, the YDC has no authority to place this juvenile in the foster group home. Accordingly, we need not decide whether the YDC or the City of Keene must pay the costs for the child’s placement in such a home.

*760Pending further action concerning the child’s disposition by the district court, the child must remain at the YDC.

*So ordered.*

Batchelder, J., did not sit.
2007 Incentive Award Program for Executives



 Exhibit 10.1 
 COLDWATER CREEK INC. 
 2007 INCENTIVE AWARD PROGRAM FOR EXECUTIVES 
 The 2007 Incentive Award Program is available to executive officers. Under the 2007 Incentive Award Program, an executive’s bonus will be based on the
company’s achievement of minimum levels of EBIT (earnings before interest and taxes) during the second half of fiscal 2007. The Company-wide EBIT goals are the same for all participants, although an individual bonus target amount, expressed as
a percentage of base salary, is established by the Compensation Committee for each executive. If EBIT does not exceed a minimum level, no bonus will be awarded under the program. Individual performance will be assessed at year end, and each
executive is assigned an overall individual performance score. An individual’s award may be reduced by up to 20% based on his or her performance score.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Notice of Continued Extension of Access Restrictions for the National Courts Building - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Kbd85X1nqM\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/notice-of-continued-extension-of-access-restrictions-for-the-national-courts-building-6\/\">Notice of Continued Extension of Access Restrictions for the National Courts Building<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/notice-of-continued-extension-of-access-restrictions-for-the-national-courts-building-6\/embed\/#?secret=Kbd85X1nqM\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Notice of Continued Extension of Access Restrictions for the National Courts Building” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"Kbd85X1nqM\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the United States Court of Federal Claims have entered a new joint order extending their prior administrative order of June 26, 2020, concerning access to the National Courts Building complex in Washington, D.C. \u00a0Effective immediately, building access will continue to remain limited to court […]"}
#### FILOTEI v. CARNEGIE-ILLINOIS STEEL CORP.

No. 10327.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Feb. 9, 1951.

Filed Feb. 23, 1951.

Ira R. Hill, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Hymen Schlesinger, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee.

Before KALODNER, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, a chambermaid employed by the defendant on its river steamer Clairton, brought this action at law to recover for personal injuries sustained when she fell from a stool on which she was standing while she was making up a “double decker bed” aboard the vessel. Her fall was allegedly caused by a sudden lurch of the vessel,- and the complaint charged negligence in -that respect as well as negligence and unseaworthiness in the defendant’s failure to furnish proper equipment and a safe place to work.

The defendant appeals from the judgment entered below upon the jury verdict against it. In our opinion, the sole ground for appeal warranting comment is the refusal of the District Judge to charge the jury, in accordance with the defendant’s *486written request, that the bartholin cysts and the perineal abscess for which the plaintiff had been treated surgically did not result from, nor were they caused by, the plaintiff’s fall. The trial judge left to the jury the issue of the causal relation of the plaintiff’s fall to the cysts and the abscess. At the conclusion of the charge, the record discloses, the plaintiff expressed the view that there was too much emphasis placed on the issue and that “perhaps * * * (it) shouldn’t have been mentioned.” In reply, defendant stated that the plaintiff had no cause to complain since the submission was in her favor.

We hold that the defendant cooperated to preserve the alleged error, and that its conduct was consistent only with acceptance of the actual instruction given to the jury by the District Judge. The case is clearly within Rule 51, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. There was, of course, evidence of other injuries to the plaintiff which would support the jury’s verdict.

Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court will be affirmed. We shall also deny the plaintiff’s motion in this Court for the assessment of a penalty against the defendant because of the alleged dilatory purpose of this appeal.
No. 11-8866.

#### Campbell *v.*Goldberg.

Ct. App. Cal., 6th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
#### § 90.16 Public Safety National Plan.

The Commission has established a National Plan which specifies special policies and procedures governing the Public Safety Pool (formally Public Safety Radio Services and the Special Emergency Radio Service). The National Plan is contained in the Report and Order in General Docket No. 87-112. The principal spectrum resource for the National Plan is the 806-809 MHz and the 851-854 MHz bands at locations farther then 110 km (68.4 miles) from the U.S./Mexico border and 140 km (87 miles) from the U.S./Canadian border (“border regions”). In the border regions, the principal spectrum for the National Plan may be different. The National plan establishes planning regions covering all parts of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. No assignments will be made in the spectrum designated for the National Plan until a regional plan for the area has been accepted by the Commission.

[69 FR 67837, Nov. 22, 2004]
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4906

To amend the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974

to limit consideration of nonemergency matters in emergency legislation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 5, 1994

Mr. SPRATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Rules

A BILL

To amend the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 to limit consideration of nonemergency

matters in emergency legislation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Emergency Spending

5 Control Act of 1994’’.

6 SEC. 2. PURPOSE.

7 The purpose of this Act is to restrict the inclusion

8 of nonemergency spending proposals in emergency spend9 ing bills.
2

•HR 4906 IH

1 SEC. 3. TREATMENT OF EMERGENCY SPENDING.

2 (a) MOTION TO STRIKE.—Title VI of the Congres3 sional Budget Act of 1974 is amended by redesignating

4 section 607 as section 608 and by adding after section

5 606 the following new section:

6 ‘‘SEC. 607. TREATMENT OF EMERGENCY SPENDING.

7 ‘‘Whenever the House of Representatives considers a

8 bill or joint resolution containing an emergency designa9 tion for purposes of section 251(b)(2)(D)(i) or section

10 252(e) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit

11 Control Act of 1985, any Member of the House may move

12 to strike any appropriation in that bill or joint resolution

13 or any provision providing direct spending in that bill or

14 joint resolution that is not so designated as an emergency,

15 and a recorded vote shall be considered as ordered if de16 manded by any Member and supported by 9 other Mem17 bers of the House.’’.

18 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of con19 tents set forth in section 1(b) of the Congressional Budget

20 and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 is amended by

21 striking the item relating to section 607 and by inserting

22 after the item relating to section 606 the following new

23 items:

‘‘Sec. 607. Treatment of emergency spending.

‘‘Sec. 608. Effective date.’’.
3

•HR 4906 IH

1 (c) LIMITATION ON NON-EMERGENCY SPENDING IN

2 EMERGENCY LEGISLATION.—If any bill or joint resolution

3 contains an emergency designation for purposes of section

4 251(b)(2)(D)(i) or section 252(e) of the Balanced Budget

5 and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 and it also

6 contains an appropriation or any provision providing di7 rect spending for any matter, event, or occurrence that

8 is not so designated as an emergency, then that non-emer9 gency appropriation or other provision providing direct

10 spending must fall within the most recently applicable allo11 cations under sections 602(a) and (b) of the Congressional

12 Budget Act of 1974.

Æ
IIA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4772

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 9 (legislative day, AUGUST 8), 1994

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 215 South Evans Street in Greenville,

North Carolina, as the ‘‘Walter B. Jones Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Federal building and United States courthouse

5 located at 215 South Evans Street in Greenville, North

6 Carolina, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Walter

7 B. Jones Federal Building and United States Court8 house’’.
2

•HR 4772 RFS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

4 building and United States courthouse referred to in sec5 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Walter

6 B. Jones Federal Building and United States Court7 house’’.

Passed the House of Representatives August 8,

1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
No. 11-8619.

#### Al-Monla *v.*United States.

C. A. 1st Cir.

Certiorari denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

KRISTOPHER LYNN LEONARD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D22-3025

November 15, 2023

Appeal from the County Court for Sarasota County; Phyllis R. Galen, 

Judge.

Andrea Flynn Mogensen of The Law Office of Andrea Flynn Mogensen, 

P.A., Sarasota, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Elba Caridad Martin, 

Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, LaROSE, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.