alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1





Written Statement of President and Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. Section 1350)





The undersigned, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Mohegan Tribal Gaming
Authority (the Authority), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, on the date hereof:





| | (a) |  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Authority for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2002 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | (b) |  | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Authority.
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




/s/    WILLIAM J.
VELARDOWilliam J. Velardo President and Chief Executive Officer December 19, 2002
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 476

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide veterans’ preference eligibility with respect to individuals who served on active duty in the armed

forces during the Persian Gulf War, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1993

Mr. PENNY (for himself and Mr. SMITH of New Jersey) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil

Service

A BILL

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide veterans’

preference eligibility with respect to individuals who

served on active duty in the armed forces during the

Persian Gulf War, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That (a) section 2108 of title 5, United States Code, is

4 amended—

5 (1) in paragraph (1)—

6 (A) in subparagraph (A) by striking ‘‘or’’

7 at the end;

8 (B) in subparagraph (B)—
2

•HR 476 IH

1 (i) by striking ‘‘the date of enactment

2 of the Veterans’ Education and Employ3 ment Assistance Act of 1976,’’ and insert4 ing ‘‘October 15, 1976,’’; and

5 (ii) by adding ‘‘or’’ after the semi6 colon; and

7 (C) by inserting after subparagraph (B)

8 the following:

9 ‘‘(C) served on active duty in the armed

10 forces during the Persian Gulf War as defined

11 by section 101(33) of title 38, not including

12 service under section 511(d) of title 10 pursu13 ant to an enlistment in the Army National

14 Guard or the Air National Guard or as a Re15 serve for service in the Army Reserve, Naval

16 Reserve, Air Force Reserve, Marine Corps Re17 serve, or Coast Guard Reserve;’’; and

18 (2) in paragraph (3)(B) by inserting ‘‘or (C)’’

19 after ‘‘paragraph (1)(B)’’.

20 (b) Section 3309(2) of title 5, United States Code,

21 is amended by inserting ‘‘or (B)’’ after ‘‘section

22 2108(3)(A)’’.

23 (c)(1) Chapter 33 of title 5, United States Code, is

24 amended by inserting after section 3328 the following:
3

•HR 476 IH

1 ‘‘§ 3330a. Eligibility for benefits as a preference eligi2 ble

3 ‘‘A benefit (as defined by section 5303A(e) of title

4 38) afforded under this title by reason of an individual’s

5 being a preference eligible shall be subject to the minimum

6 active-duty service requirement under section 5303A(d) of

7 title 38, if applicable.’’.

8 (2) The table of sections for chapter 33 of title 5,

9 United States Code, is amended by inserting at the end

10 of the items relating to subchapter I the following:

‘‘3330a. Eligibility for benefits as a preference eligible.’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the Annual  Report of Return On Investment  Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Guy
R. Wilcox, Chief Financial Officer,  certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.


/s/ Guy R. Wilcox
--------------------------------------------
Guy R. Wilcox
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
September 30, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4837 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4837

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
         coastwise trade and fisheries for the vessel ATTITUDE.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 26, 1994

Mr. Lancaster introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
         coastwise trade and fisheries for the vessel ATTITUDE.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the 
Act of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and sections 12106 and 12108 
of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may 
issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for 
employment in the coastwise trade and the fisheries for the vessel 
ATTITUDE (State of North Carolina official number NC3607AN).
                                 <all>
```
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1020/2005

of 30 June 2005         

fixing the rates of the refunds applicable to certain cereal and rice products exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in rice (2), and in particular Article 14(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The rates of the refunds applicable to the basic products listed in Annex A to Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000 and in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 or in Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003, exported in the form of goods listed in Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 or in Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 respectively, are fixed as shown in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 July 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 June 2005.

For the Commission

Günter VERHEUGEN            

Vice-President

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

(2)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 96.

(3)OJ L 177, 15.7.2000, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 886/2004 (OJ L 168, 1.5.2004, p. 14).

(4)OJ L 275, 29.9.1987, p. 36.

(5)OJ L 159, 1.7.1993, p. 112. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1548/2004 (OJ L 280, 31.8.2004, p. 11).

----

ANNEX

Rates of the refunds applicable from 1 July 2005 to certain cereals and rice products exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty (1)

----

(1)  The rates set out in this Annex are not applicable to exports to Bulgaria, with effect from 1 October 2004, and to the goods listed in Tables I and II to Protocol No 2 the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation of 22 July 1972 exported to the Swiss Confederation or to the Principality of Liechtenstein with effect from1 February 2005.

(2)  As far as agricultural products obtained from the processing of a basic product or/and assimilated products are concerned, the coefficients shown in Annex E to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000 shall be applied (OJ L 177, 15.7.2000, p. 1).

(3)  The goods concerned fall in under CN code 3505 10 50.

(4)  Goods listed in Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 or referred to in Article 2 of Regulation (EEC) No 2825/93 (OJ L 258, 16.10.1993, p. 6).

(5)  For syrups of CN codes NC 1702 30 99, 1702 40 90 and 1702 60 90, obtained from mixing glucose and fructose syrup, the export refund may be granted only for the glucose syrup.

----
CISWI Rule

Summary of major changes

 Emission limit changes as a result of:

o New data and revisions to the CISWI inventory for ERUs (energy recovery units) 

and waste-burning kilns

o Data quality assurance checks

o Review of dioxin/furan data and non-detect methodology

 Subcategory changes:

o ERUs: PM and other CAA 129 metals now considered combustion-based 

pollutants for ERUs

o Waste burning kilns: long kilns and preheater/precalciner kilns further 

subcategorized for CO

 Monitoring changes:

o Removal of oxygen correction requirements for CO limits for ERUs during 

startup and shutdown and removal of CO CEMS requirements

o Replacement of continuous particulate matter monitoring for ERUs greater than 

250 MMBtu/hr design heat input capacity with continuous parameter monitoring 

system requirements

 Definition changes:

o Revised the definition of waste-burning kiln to exclude the use of ingredients

o Reinstated the definition of contained gaseous material

o Established a definition of foundry sand thermal reclamation unit

 Notice and comment issues:

o In the March 21, 2011 notice, we identified seven issues affecting CISWI for 

which reconsideration should be granted and additional opportunity for public 

review and comment should be given: 

 revision of the subcategory of energy recovery units; 

 establishment of limitations on fuel switching provisions; 

 revision of the definition of CISWI to exclude cyclonic burn barrels; 

 inclusion of an affirmative defense provision for malfunction events; 

 revisions to the carbon monoxide monitoring requirements; 

 establishment of a full-load stack test requirement for carbon monoxide 

coupled with continuous oxygen monitoring for CISWI units; and, 

 establishment of a definition of “homogeneous waste” in the CISWI rule.
Swanson, Brian (OST) 

-~,-From: 

,, s~h't~( · 

To; 

Subject: 

Heidmann, Randy <Randy.Heidmann@wolterskluwer.com>. 

Monday, August 13, 2012 10:22 AM 

Swanson, Brian (OST) 

Brainerd,MN Airport Service and SkyWest · 2: I 0 

I am a frequent flying out of Brainerd,MN airport and I fully support the choice of our local Airport Commission to 

accept the bid of SkyWest Airlines. I also hope that DOT will also support this local decision as well. Thank you in 

advance. 

Randy J. Heidmann 

IRA/HSA Consultant 

Wolters Kluwer Financial Services 

800·397-2341 Ext. 1105571 

randy.heidmann @wolterskluwer.com 

... 

1
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of NetFabric Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Fahad
Syed certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




August
      13, 2010
              By:
              /s/ Fahad
      SyedName:
      Fahad SyedTitle:
      Chairman and Chief Executive Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
NetFabric Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by NetFabric Holdings, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Argued and submitted March 8, 1993,

award of attorney fees and sanctions reversed; otherwise affirmed March 16, 1994

#### Nick ALBRECHT, *Appellant, v.*Deborah K. HADLEY, James M. Hadley, *Respondents, and*FRED MEYER, INC., an Oregon corporation, *Defendant.*

(9104-02176; CA A73581)

869 P2d 907

Ivan M. Karmel argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.

Holly J. Hummel argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent Deborah K. Hadley.

Tyler Marshall waived appearance for respondent James M. Hadley.

Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and Richardson, Chief Judge,* and Riggs, Judge.

PER CURIAM

*

 Richardson, C. J., *vice*Durham, J.

*44PER CURIAM

Plaintiff appeals from the adverse judgment in this declaratory judgment action. We reverse the attorney fees and sanctions awarded against him pursuant to ORS 20.105 and ORCP 17. The complaint and the action are not *“entirely*devoid of legal or factual support.” *Mattiza v. Foster,*311 Or 1, 8, 803 P2d 723 (1990) (footnote omitted; emphasis supplied); *see also Westfall v. Rust International,*314 Or 553, 840 P2d 700 (1992). Plaintiffs other contentions are without merit and require no discussion.

Defendant Deborah Hadley seeks damages pursuant to ORS 19.160 and sanctions pursuant to ORCP 17 for plaintiffs prosecution of this appeal. They are denied.

Award of attorney fees and sanctions pursuant to ORS 20.105 and ORCP 17 reversed; otherwise affirmed.
#### § 76.1616 Contracts with local exchange carriers.

Within 10 days of final execution of a contract permitting a local exchange carrier to use that part of the transmission facilities of a cable system extending from the last multi-user terminal to the premises of the end use, the parties shall submit a copy of such contract, along with an explanation of how such contract is reasonably limited in scope and duration, to the Commission for review. The parties shall serve a copy of this submission on the local franchising authority, along with a notice of the local franchising authority's right to file comments with the Commission consistent with § 76.7.
§ 80.326 Notification of resumption of normal working. ( a ) When distress traffic has ceased, or when complete silence is no longer necessary on a frequency which has been used for distress traffic, the station which has controlled this traffic must transmit on that frequency a message addressed “to all stations” indicating that normal working may be resumed. ( 1 ) In radiotelegraphy, this message consists of: ( i ) The distress signal SOS;
( ii ) The call “to all stations” (CQ), sent three times;
( iii ) The word DE;
( iv ) The call sign of the station sending the message;
( v ) The time of handing in the message;
( vi ) The name and call sign of the mobile station which was in distress;
( vii ) The service abbreviation QUM.
( 2 ) In radiotelephony, this message consists of: ( i ) The distress signal MAYDAY;
( ii ) The call “Hello all stations”, spoken three times;
( iii ) The words THIS IS;
( iv ) The call sign or other identification of the station sending the message;
( v ) The time of handing in of the message;
( vi ) The name and call sign of the mobile station which was in distress;
( vii ) The words SEELONCE FEENEE OR PRU-DONCE.
( b ) Until they receive the foregoing message indicating that normal or limited working may be resumed, all stations which are aware of the distress traffic, and which are not taking part in it, are forbidden to transmit on the frequencies on which the distress traffic is taking place.
EXHIBIT 10.6
 SUBURBAN PROPANE PARTNERS, L.P.
2000 RESTRICTED UNIT PLAN
EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 1, 2000
AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 17, 2006
FURTHER AMENDED ON JULY 31, 2007, OCTOBER 31, 2007, JANUARY 24, 2008,
JANUARY 20, 2009 AND NOVEMBER 10, 2009
 ARTICLE I
PURPOSE AND APPROVAL
  ARTICLE II
DEFINITIONS




---



##### 



provided, however,




---



##### 








---



##### 



ARTICLE III
ADMINISTRATION OF THE PLAN
  disinterested person independent director




---



##### 



ARTICLE IV
COMMON UNIT GRANTS
 Time Vesting Grants
 Forfeiture
 Vesting Schedule
 Other Grants
 ARTICLE V
OTHER PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO VESTING
 Change of Control
 Forfeiture
 Disability
 Retirement.
 Recycling of Forfeited Shares
  Recoupment Policy




---



##### 



ARTICLE VI
DELIVERY OF UNITS, ETC.
 Delivery of Common Units
 Transferability
 Rights of Grantees
 ARTICLE VII
ADJUSTMENT UPON CHANGES IN CAPITALIZATION
   ARTICLE VIII
TERMINATION AND AMENDMENT OF THE PLAN
  ARTICLE IX
MISCELLANEOUS
 Non-Exclusivity of the Plan
 Limitation of Liability




---



##### 



Regulations and Other Approvals; Governing Law




---



##### 



Withholding of Taxes
 Interpretation
 Effective Date
No. 11-1111.

No. 11-5941.

No. 11-7081.

#### Murray et al. *v.*Sullivan et al., Sanders *v.*Kentucky, Cook *v.*Hubin et al., *1018White *v.*Longino, Deputy Warden, et al., El-Mumit *v.*Louisiana, Rojas v. Connecticut, Hatcher *v.*United States, Rascon *v.*Texas, Cuffy *v.*Florida, Middleton *v.*Motley Rice LLC, Vivas *v.*Florida Department of Children and Families, Velez *v.*Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Brown *v.*Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Porco *v.*New York, Barrino *v.*Department of the Treasury et al., Tierney *v.*Espinada, Warden, et al., Wheeler *v.*United States, Levine *v.*Holencik, Warden, Graham *v.*United States,

*1017
      *ante,*p. 923;

*ante,*p. 907;

565 U. S. 1204;

*1018No. 11-7098.

No. 11-7669.

No. 11-7725.

No. 11-7874.

No. 11-8162.

No. 11-8275.

No. 11-8314.

No. 11-8352.

No. 11-8429.

No. 11-8453.

No. 11-8557.

No. 11-8563.

No. 11-8696.

No. 11-8926.

No. 11-9060.

No. 11-9169.

*ante,*p. 907;

*ante,*p. 908;

565 U. S. 1209;

565 U. S. 1183;

565 U. S. 1249;

565 U. S. 1266;

565 U. S. 1267;

*ante,*p. 908;

*ante,*p. 909;

*ante,*p. 910;

*ante,*p. 924;

*ante,*p. 912;

565 U. S. 1270;

565 U. S. 1275;

*ante,*p. 928; and

*ante,*p. 951. Petitions for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CEO AS REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14 or 15d-14 OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHAGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Zap.Com Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
    /s/ Avram A. GlazerAvram A. Glazer
President and CEO
 13
#### § 69.156 Marketing expenses.

Effective July 1, 2000, the marketing expenses formerly allocated to the common line and traffic sensitive baskets, and the switched services within the trunking basket pursuant to § 32.6610 of this chapter and § 69.403 will now be recovered in the CMT basket created pursuant to § 61.42(d)(1) of this chapter. These marketing expenses will be recovered through the elements outlined in §§ 69.152, 69.153 and 69.154.

[65 FR 38703, June 21, 2000]
Argued and submitted June 13,

reversed and remanded August 10, 1994

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Appellant, v.*CHRIS J. BEGLERIES, *Respondent.*

(93-7166; CA A81765)

877 P2d 1240

Douglas F. Zier, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Stephen L. Roman argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Zafiratos & Roman.

Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Haselton, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded. *State v. Mealer,*129 Or App 456, 879 P2d 230 (1994).
No. 11-6004.

#### Halcomb *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
CIC STUDENT NAME TAG FORM 

NDU name tags are issued to all CIC students attending in-resident programs. To ensure 

your name tag is printed with the correct information please provide the following: 

TITLE: 

FIRST NAME: 

LAST NAME: 

SERVICE/AGENCY: 

COMPLETION GUIDANCE 

• Please do not provide job titles. Only honorifics/ranks will be accepted (e.g. LTC,

LtCOL, CAPT, Lt Col, Dr. Mrs., Ms., etc.).

• Students may choose to have their name tag printed with their preferred

name/nickname instead of their legal first name. (e.g. Thomas -> Tom)

• Please provide the acronym of your Service/Agency (e.g. U.S. Army -> USA).

• Example name tag information format:

PLEASE COMPLETE THIS FORM AND SUBMIT TO k.c.ostrowski.civ@ndu.edu.

 LTC TOM

 USA JONES
§ 5.111 Limitations on use. ( a ) Stations may make only such transmissions as are necessary and directly related to the conduct of the licensee's stated program of experimentation and the related station instrument of authorization, and as governed by the provisions of the rules and regulations contained in this part. When transmitting, the licensee must use every precaution to ensure that it will not cause harmful interference to the services carried on by stations operating in accordance with the Table of Frequency Allocations of part 2 of this chapter.
( b ) A licensee shall adhere to the program of experimentation as stated in its application or in the station instrument of authorization.
( c ) The radiations of the transmitter shall be suspended immediately upon detection or notification of a deviation from the technical requirements of the station authorization until such deviation is corrected, except for transmissions concerning the immediate safety of life or property, in which case the transmissions shall be suspended as soon as the emergency is terminated.
#### § 87.197 ELT test procedures.

ELT testing must avoid outside radiation. Bench and ground tests conducted outside of an RF-shielded enclosure must be conducted with the ELT terminated into a dummy load.