alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.1



LOGO

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Teléfonos de México, S.A.B. de C.V., a sociedad anónima bursátil de capital variable organized under the laws of Mexico (the Company), does
hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2011 of the Company (the Form 20-F) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                   
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------------------
|Dated: April 26, 2012 |  |                                   
|                      | 
|                      |  | /s/ Héctor Slim Seade             
|                      |  | Name: Héctor Slim Seade           
|                      |  | Title: Chief Executive Officer    
|                      | 
|Dated: April 26, 2012 |  |                                   
|                      | 
|                      |  | /s/ Carlos Fernando Robles Miaja  
|                      |  | Name: Carlos Fernando Robles Miaja
|                      |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 21
 List of Subsidiaries
  Name
    
    StateAmerican Office Park Properties, TPGP, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaPSBP QRS, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaHernmore, Inc.
    
    MarylandAOPP Acquisition Corp. Two
    
    CaliforniaTenant Advantage, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaPS Business Parks, L.P.
    
    CaliforniaPSBP Northpointe D, L.L.C.
    
    VirginiaPSBP Monroe, L.L.C.
    
    VirginiaMonroe Parkway, L.L.C.
    
    Virginia2767 Prosperity Way, L.L.C
    
    CaliforniaMetro Park I, L.L.C.
    
    DelawareMetro Park II, L.L.C.
    
    DelawareMetro Park III, L.L.C.
    
    DelawareMetro Park IV, L.L.C.
    
    DelawareMetro Park V, L.L.C.
    
    DelawareMetro Park Gude, L.L.C.
    
    DelawarePSBP Westwood GP, L.L.C.
    
    DelawarePSBP Industrial, L.L.C.
    
    DelawareMiami International Commerce Center
    
    FloridaREVX-098, L.L.C.
    
    DelawarePS Rose Canyon, L.L.C.
    
    DelawareGB, L.L.C.
    
    MarylandPSBP Meadows L.L.C.
    
    DelawarePSB Boca Commerce Park, L.L.C.
    
    FloridaPSB Wellington Commerce Park I, L.L.C.
    
    FloridaPSB Wellington Commerce Park II, L.L.C.
    
    FloridaPSB Wellington Commerce Park III, L.L.C.
    
    Florida
#### § 76.43 Mixed-use rule.

A franchising authority may not regulate the provision of any services other than cable services offered over the cable system of a cable operator, with the exception of channel capacity on institutional networks.

[84 FR 44750, Aug. 27, 2019]
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4957 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4957

    To amend the Railway Labor Act concerning the applicability of 
requirements of that Act to United States air carriers and flight crews 
        engaged in flight operations outside the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 12, 1994

Mr. Rahall (for himself, Mr. Borski, Mr. DeFazio, Mr. Coppersmith, Mr. 
  Costello, and Mr. de Lugo) introduced the following bill; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Public Works and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Railway Labor Act concerning the applicability of 
requirements of that Act to United States air carriers and flight crews 
        engaged in flight operations outside the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY OF RAILWAY LABOR ACT PROVISIONS TO AIR 
              CARRIERS AND FLIGHT CREWS OPERATING OUTSIDE THE UNITED 
              STATES.

    (a) Foreign Commerce.--Section 201 of the Railway Labor Act (45 
U.S.C. 181) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``As used in 
this title, the term `foreign commerce' includes flight operations 
(excluding ground operations performed by persons other than flight 
crew members) conducted in whole or in part outside the United States 
(as defined by section 40102(a)(41) of title 49, United States Code) by 
an air carrier (as defined by section 40102(a)(2) of such title).''.
    (b) Employee.--Section 202 of such Act (45 U.S.C. 182) is amended 
by adding at the end the following: ``As used in this title, the term 
`employee' also includes flight crew members employed by an air carrier 
(as defined by section 40102(a)(2) of title 49, United States Code) 
while such flight crew members perform work in whole or in part outside 
the United States (as defined by section 40102(a)(41) of such 
title).''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 95.2393 WMTS labeling requirements.

Each WMTS device must be labeled with the following statement: “Operation of this equipment requires the prior coordination with a frequency coordinator designated by the FCC for the Wireless Medical Telemetry Service.”
EXHIBIT
32   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Amended Annual Report of CytoGenix, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Malcolm H. Skolnick, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1)
This Amended Annual Report of CytoGenix, Inc. on form 10-K/A for the year ended
December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The
information contained in such Amended Annual Report of CytoGenix, Inc. on Form
10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2007 fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/
Malcolm H. Skolnick  MALCOLM
H. SKOLNICK CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER May 12,
2008
###### Editorial Note on Part 74

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 74 appear at 64 FR 4055, Jan. 27, 1999.

#### § 74.22 Use of common antenna structure.

The simultaneous use of a common antenna structure by more than one station authorized under this part, or by one or more stations of any other service may be authorized. The owner of each antenna structure is responsible for ensuring that the structure, if required, is painted and/or illuminated in accordance with part 17 of this chapter. In the event of default by the owner, each licensee or permittee shall be responsible for ensuring that the structure complies with applicable painting and lighting requirements.

[61 FR 4368, Feb. 6, 1996]
No. 11-6213.

#### Martinez-Sosa *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350


In connection with the Annual Report of ION Geophysical Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2015 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven A. Bate, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:


|   |                                                                                                                                      
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: June 27, 2016/s/ Steven A. BateSteven A. BateExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
- Memorial-196701-AL
AL 1967

- [Untitled]
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

August 27, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00104

- CV

Michael Edward RODRIGUEZ

, Appellant

v.

Nora G. RODRIGUEZ

, Appellee

From the 131st Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020

- CI

- 00908

Honorable No rma Gonzales , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant’s brief was originally due July 12, 2021; however, the court granted him an extension until August 11. When the brief was not filed, we ordered appellant to file the brief by August 26 and advised him the appeal could be dismissed if the brief were not filed. On August 25, appellant, who is representing himself pro se, filed a mot ion explaining why he had been unable to complete his brief and requesting an additional fifteen

- day extension of time.

We grant the motion and order Michael E. Rodriguez to file his appellant’s brief by September 10, 2021 . Rodriguez is advised that no further extensions of time will be granted absent a motion, filed before the brief is due, that (1) demonstrates extraordinary circumstances justifying further delay, (2) advises the court of the efforts he has expended in preparing the brief, and (3) prov ides the court reasonable assurance that the brief will be completed and filed by the requested extended deadline. Rodriguez is further advised that if the brief or a complying motion is not filed by the date ordered, the court may dismiss the appeal

with out further notice. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a); 42.3(c).

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 27th day of August, 2021

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
No. 10-10676.

#### Pitts *v.*Glebe, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioner to defer consideration of petition for writ of cer-tiorari denied. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-7229.

#### In re Bakhouche, aka Ali,

565 U. S. 1109. Motion for leave to file petition for rehearing denied.
301 LUCERNE ROAD- HOMER CITY, PA 15748

PHONE 724-479-4252 o FAX 724-479-3592

September 24, 2009

Response Letter

Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.

101 Lucerne Road

Homer City, Pennsylvania 15748

Dear Sir/Madam:

On June 17th of 2009, a failure occurred in our iron during a frac operation, which resulted in the

release of fluid. The preliminary results of the inspection pointed towards a mechanical failure of

the iron elbow. Further review is being conducted by Halliburton in Duncan, OK. At the time of the

failure, there was an initial burst of fluid that blew out over our trucks about 60 feet towards the

connection of the lease road and the location. Fluid began to gather on location and started to flow

to the back side of the location towards a forested area. Halliburton’s crew along with third party

contactors noticed the flow of the fluid. They reacted by using a bulldozer and digging a trench to

stop the fluid from entering the forested area. The captured fluid was then pumped into the pit on

location. At the time of trench being dug, Halliburton employees built berms around the well head

to divert all flow of fluid into the pit. Trenches were also dug by Halliburton employees to help the

flow of the fluid into the pit.

Bob Kidd from Weavertown Environmental group was contacted by Halliburton and arrived on site

at 1:38 AM on 6-18-09. Mr. Kidd was taken around the area and shown where the trench was dug to

catch any water that may have been running off of the location. He also reported that he had viewed

the pump that was taking the water back up to the pit.

Per a conversation with Mr. Mike O’ Donnell on 8-3-09 at 2:00 pm, the statement was made that no

further actions required due to the results and remediation of the spill. With speaking with Mr. O’

Donnell, he stated that their samples from a small stream running behind the well location had not

shown any significa;nt contamination.

Daniel Chimino

HSE Technical Professional

cc: Michael Laxton

HESI303041
#### § 95.1701 Scope.

This subpart contains rules that apply only to the General Mobile Radio Service (GMRS).
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P157Community Policing DefinedCommunity Policing Defined provides a detailed description of the elements and subelements that fall under the community policing philosophy. The document describes the range of collaborative partnerships that exist between policing agencies and the individuals and organizations they serve. It outlines the process of how they go about engaging in the proactive and systematic examination of identified problems to develop effective responses, and it illustrates how they align their organizational management, structure, personnel, and information systems to support community partnerships and proactive problem-solving.By Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS Office)Categories: Foundations of Community Policing • Police OperationsLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p157Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFBook • Oct 2012Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 05:06 (UTC-5) in 0.89 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
- KY
Editorial Note on Part 36
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 74 FR 23956, May 22, 2009, 77 FR 30411, May 23, 2012, 82 FR 25538, June 2, 2017, and corrected at 83 FR 4153, Jan. 30, 2018. Nomenclature changes to part 36 also appear at 83 FR 63587, Dec. 11, 2018, and 84 FR 4360, Feb. 15, 2019.

§ 36.155 Wideband and exchange trunk (C&WF)—Category 2—apportionment procedures. ( a ) The cost of C&WF applicable to this category shall be directly assigned where feasible. If direct assignment is not feasible, cost shall be apportioned between the state and interstate jurisdictions on the basis of the relative number of minutes of use.
( b ) Effective July 1, 2001, through December 31, 2024, all study areas shall apportion Category 2 Wideband and exchange trunk C&WF among the jurisdictions using the relative number of minutes of use, as specified in paragraph (a) of this section, for the twelve-month period ending December 31, 2000. Direct assignment of any Category 2 equipment to the jurisdictions shall be updated annually.
[52 FR 17229, May 6, 1987, as amended at 66 FR 33206, June 21, 2001; 75 FR 30301, June 1, 2010; 76 FR 30841, May 27, 2011; 79 FR 36237, June 26, 2014]
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5009 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5009

            To extend the Export Administration Act of 1979.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 21, 1994

 Mr. Hamilton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To extend the Export Administration Act of 1979.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 20 of the 
Export Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 2419) is amended by 
striking ``August 20, 1994'' and inserting in lieu thereof ``October 
20, 1994''.
                                 <all>
```
# **EXHIBIT 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofInteractive Intelligence, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period endingSeptember 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen R. Head, Chief Financial Officer, VicePresident of Finance and Administration, Secretary and Treasurer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully  complies withthe  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The  information  contained in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Stephen  R. Head                                                                             |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Stephen R.  Head                                                                                 |
| Chief  Financial Officer, Vice President of Finance and Administration, Secretary  and Treasurer |
| (Principal  Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)                                  |
| November 15,  2004                                                                               |

 

----
EXHIBIT 23.1



    CONSENT OF GRANT THORNTON, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

     We have  issued  our  report  dated  December  8,  2004,  accompanying  the
consolidated  financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of
International  DisplayWorks,  Inc.  on Form 10-K for the year ended  October 31,
2004. We hereby consent to the  incorporation by reference of said report in the
Registration  Statement of  International  DisplayWorks,  Inc. on Form S-8 (File
Number  333-120404,  effective  November 12, 2004)  pertaining to a Stock Option
Agreement  and  2004  Employment  Agreement,  Form  S-8  (File  No.  333-108907,
effective  September 18, 2003)  pertaining  to the Amended 2000 Employee  Equity
Incentive Plan, Form S-8 (File No. 333-87296,  effective May 1, 2002) pertaining
to the 2000 Employee Equity Incentive Plan and Stock Option Agreements, Form S-8
(File No. 333-87298,  effective May 1, 2002) pertaining to the 1999 Stock Option
Plan for  Non-Employee  Directors  and the Morrow  Snowboards,  Inc. 1990 Equity
Incentive  Plan  and Form S-8  (File  No.  333-04761,  effective  May 30,  1996)
pertaining to the Morrow  Snowboards,  Inc.  Stock Option Plan for  Non-Employee
Directors and related Prospectuses.


/s/ Grant Thornton
------------------
Grant Thornton


Hong Kong
December 30, 2004
[No. 1903.]

#### Joe Pratt *v.*The State.

Malicious Mischief.— Information to charge the offense of defacing a public building, unless the building defaced be one that is specifically named in article 418 of the Penal Code, should allege that the building was a “ public building held for public use.” In- failing to so describe the school-house alleged to be defaced, the information in this case was deficient, and therefore the motion in arrest of judgment should have prevailed.

Appeal from the County Court of Kaufman. Tried below before the Hon. J. E. Dillard, County Judge.

The conviction in this case was for defacing a building in Kaufman county known as the school-house of the Baker Prairie school community. A fine of $10 was assessed against the appellant.

*E. P.*Teague, for the appellant.

*J. H. Burts,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

Willson, Judge.

It is not alleged in the information that the school-house, which defendant is charged with having injured, was a “ public building, held for public use.” This allegation is essential in an indictment under articles 417 and 418 of the Penal Code, where the building is one which is not specifically named in article 418 as a public building. *(Brown*v. *The State,*16 Texas Ct. App., 245.) Defendant’s motion in arrest of judgment should have been sustainedand because the information is insufficient in matter of Substance, the judgment is reversed and the prosecution is dismissed.

*Reversed and dismissed.*

[Opinion delivered November 7, 1885.]