alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes  of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of General Medical Sciences Special Emphasis Panel NIH Pathway to Independence Award.                    

*Date:*                         August 24-25, 2006.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Meredith D. Temple-O'Connor, PhD, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Drive, Room 3AN12C, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-2772,                         *templeocm@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: July 31, 2006. 

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 06-6833 Filed 8-9-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
      ( print page 51840)    
*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel, PANDAS.                    

*Date:*                         September 22, 2006.                    

*Time:*                         3 p.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         David I. Sommers, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institutes of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 6154, MSC 9609, Bethesda, MD 20892-9606, 301-443-7861,                         *dsommers@mail.nih.gov*.                     

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS) 

August 24, 2006.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 06-7337 Filed 8-30-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            College of Information and Cyberspace
                    National Defense University
                CIC
        Search
                    Search CIC:
                        Search
                Search CIC:
                    Search
    Home

    About 
        Mission & Vision

    Faculty & Staff

    Fact Sheet

    Alumni

    Internships

    FAQ

    Admissions 
        Eligibility Requirements

    Admissions Calendar

    Application Instructions

    Apply Online

    International Students

    Academics 
        Graduate Catalog

    M.S. in Strategic Information and Cyberspace Studies
        
        JPME Master's Degree

    Cyber Workforce Master's Degree (Part Time)

    Leadership Development Programs

    Graduate Certificates

    Academic Partners

    Current Students 
        JPME II  Incoming Students

    LDP Incoming Students

    Student Registration

    Bring Your Own Device

    IA Compliance

    Completion Procedures / Order Transcripts

    Student Services and Resources

    Events
    
        Cyber Beacon

    Cyber PME Colloquium

    Hopper Award

    Lecture Series

    CYBERCOM Symposium

    NEWS

    UC2
    
        About

    Events

    Work With Us

    Center for Cybersecurity
    
        About

    Cybersecurity Center POC

    Cybersecurity Supporting Faculty

    CAE-CDE CISO Certificate Program

    Cybersecurity Trending News

    Cyber Labs
        
        Ethical Hacking

    Critical Infrastructure - SCADA

    Cyber Exercises
        
        Tabletop Exercise

    Cyber Competitions

    Cyber Resources and Awareness

    Stakeholder / Industry Advisory Council

    Contact 
        Contact Us

    Directions

    Access to Ft. McNair

    Map of Ft. McNair  Home
  NEWS
  News & Announcements
 News & Announcements News
 iCollege Professors McGibbon and Hurley Publications Out Soon By Patricia Coopersmith
 Double Congratuations to iCollege visiting professor, Mark McGibbon, who had a chapter published in the book "The Process Enneagram: Essays on Theory and Practice," edited by Richard N. Knowles, and published by
Emergent Publications on Litchfield Park, AZ.  In addition, Mark and
fellow professor John Hurley also just received word from the Chief Editor of "CrossTalk Magazine" that their article on "The Transformation
of Software Engineering Security" will be published in the Jan/Feb edition.  Great job!
 SHARE
 PRINT
 National Defense University


College of Information and Cyberspace

300 Fifth Ave., Bldg. 62
Fort Lesley J. McNair
Washington, DC 20319-5066

202-685-6300
                    Stay Connected
                
                
                DOD Privacy & Security
 DOD Links Disclaimer
 DOD Social Media Policy
 DOD Web Policy
 FOIA
 NDU System of Records Notice
 NDU Privacy & Security Notice
 No FEAR Act
 Open GOV
 Plain Writing Act
 Section 508
 Small Business Act
 USA.gov
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
VICTOR HUGO ALVARADO CORTEZ, Petitioner,
v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. No. 09-70345 Agency No. A070-781-971
MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Argued and Submitted April 7, 2015 Pasadena, California Before: REINHARDT, McKEOWN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges. Victor Hugo Alvarado Cortez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of his motion to reopen his removal proceedings. We have jurisdic tion under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for 

# FILED
APR 20 2015 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.abuse of discretion. Maravilla Maravilla v. Ashcroft , 381 F.3d 855, 857 (9th Cir. 2004). We grant the petition and remand to the BIA. We recognize equitable tolling of deadlines on motions to reopen “during periods when a petitioner is prevented fro m filing because of deception, fraud, or error, as long as the petitioner acts with due diligence in discovering the deception, fraud, or error.” Iturribarria v. I.N.S. , 321 F.3d 889, 897 (9th Cir. 2003). The BIA either misunderstood or failed to consid er the time sequence of Alvarado Cortez’s contacts and follow up with One Stop Immigration Services as explained in the statement submitted with his appeal brief. We remand so that the BIA may “consider and address in its entirety the evidence submitted” to support Alvarado Cortez on this issue. Singh v. Gonzales , 494 F.3d 1170, 1172 (9th Cir. 2007) (quoting Mohammed v. Gonzales , 400 F.3d 785, 793 (9th Cir. 2005)); see also Sun v. Mukasey , 555 F.3d 802, 806 (9th Cir. 2009) (granting petition where the BIA made an erroneous factual assumption in its diligence analysis). The BIA’s decision on whether the c onduct of the “notario” at One Stop Immigration Services constitutes “ex ceptional circumstances” was based on In re Compean, Bangaly & J-E-C- ( Compean I ), 24 I. & N. Dec. 710 (A.G. 2009), vacated by In re Compean, Bangaly & J-E-C- ( Compean II ), 25 I. & N. Dec. 1, 3

2(A.G. 2009). In light of the vacation of Compean I , we remand for consideration under current standards. 1 Finally, the BIA did not discuss Alvara do Cortez’s fear of future persecution based on his religious belief. See Maravilla Maravilla , 381 F.3d at 858 (requiring the BIA to “indicate with specificity that it heard and considered petitioner’s claims”). We also remand for consideration of this claim. 2 PETITION GRANTED; REMANDED
.

1 To the extent that the BIA relied on our decision in Hernandez v. Mukasey , 524 F.3d 1014 (9th Cir. 2008), it failed to consider whether the “notario” on whom Alvarado Cortez relied was an agent of an attorney, whether Alvarado Cortez believed that the “notario” on whom he re lied was an attorney or an agent of an attorney, or whether this case is otherwise distinguishable from Hernandez
. 2 Alvarado Cortez’s motion to take judicial notice is denied as moot. 3
Appendix I

Initial Evidence Grade Assignments

	Initial Evidence Grade Assignments

	TOPIC		EVIDENCE GRADES

	EB	NC	DF	JK	HJ	LL	HQ	FINAL GRADE	PAGE

CE alone versus CE and glaucoma procedure (long-term)	B+	A	B	A	A	A	B	A	36

Limbus- versus fornix-based combined procedures	B	B	B	B	B	B	B	B	37

Small versus large incision PECE	B	B	B	B	B	B	C (B)	B	39

PECE plus trabeculectomy versus trabeculectomy alone	C	C	C	B	B	C	C	C	40

PECE plus trabeculectomy	C	B	B	C	B	C	B	C	41

ECCE plus trabeculectomy versus trabeculectomy	B	B	C	B	B	C	C	B	42

ECCE plus trabeculectomy	C	C	B	C	B	C	C	C	43

ECCE alone	C	B	B	C	B	C	B	C	44

PECE alone	C	B	B	C	B	C	B	C	45

CE with functioning filtering bleb	I		C	B	B	I	C	I	47

CE alone versus CE plus glaucoma procedure (short-term)	B	B	C	B	B	B	I	I	49

Adjuvant medications in combined ECCE and trabeculectomy	B	C	C	C	C	C	C	C	50

PECE combined procedures	C	B	B	C	C	B	I	C	51

PECE alone	I		I		I	I		I	51

ECCE combined procedures	I	B	C	C	C	C	B	C	52

ECCE alone	C		C		C	C		C	52

Effect of glaucoma surgery on cataract 	A-	A	B	A	A	B	A	A	55

Effect of mitomycin-C on IOP in combined surgery	C		C	I	B	C	B	B	60

Effect of 5-FU on IOP in combined surgery	B	A	B	A	A	B	B	B	63

One- versus two-site procedures	B		C	B	A	B	C	C	66

Nuclear expression versus phacoemulsification	C	B	B	C	B	C	I	C	69

Staged versus combined procedures	I	B	I	I	I	I	C	I	71

Trabeculectomy versus other procedures	I	B	I	I	I	I	I	I	73
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135975 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 135975 

 COA: 278937 

Wayne CC: 77-003866

MICHAEL L. WILSON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 11, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s0828 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 9, 2008 

 Clerk
46813.

#### MAYS v. THE STATE.

(381 SE2d 514)

Decided June 8, 1989.

*Gifford & Buafo, Althea L. Buafo,*for appellant.

*Willis B. Sparks III, District Attorney, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, Andrew S. Ree,*for appellee.

Smith, Justice.

James Mays III was convicted of felony murder for the stabbing death of Garry Wilson and was sentenced to life imprisonment.1 In this appeal the defendant raises two enumerations of error. We affirm.

1. Mays contends that the evidence does not support the verdict. The evidence put forth at trial was sufficient for a rational trier of fact to have found proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. *Jackson v.*Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).

2. The defendant complains that his confession should have been suppressed. We find no error in the trial court’s refusal to suppress the confession.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Weltner, J., not participating.*

1

 The crime was committed on May 22, 1988. The Bibb County jury returned its verdict of guilty on October 4, 1988. A motion for new trial was filed on November 4, 1988, heard and denied on February 9, 1989. Notice of Appeal was filed on March 6, 1989. The transcript of evidence was filed on March 6, 1989. The record was docketed in this Court on March 22, 1989. The case was submitted on May 5, 1989.
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0944Effective Leadership Response to the Challenges of Law Enforcement SuicideThis comprehensive project focused on strengthening programs that help families support officers in mental or emotional crises or considering suicide. The suite of six publications includes four reports documenting innovative interventions currently being used around the country, one protocol for agencies on how to address an officer suicide, and a resources abstract. This publication, Effective Leadership Response to the Challenges of Law Enforcement Suicide, focuses on the importance of progressive law enforcement leadership. Contemporary law enforcement leadership should not ignore the existence of the problems caused by stress or avoid taking action to ensure the health and well-being of their employees. The author focuses on several specific elements of effective leadership needed when dealing with the stress of law enforcement personnel.By James D. SewellCategories: Police OperationsLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0944Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Jun 2021Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 04:50 (UTC-5) in 0.89 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7732
JOHNNY CROWDER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus EVA SWITZER; EDDIE SMITH; ROBIN WOODARD, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-1018-5-BO) Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 4, 1998 Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Johnny Crowder, Appellant Pro Se. Eileen Coffey Moore, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Crowder v. Switzer , No. CA-96-1018-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 5, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0171Protecting Your Community from Terrorism, Volume 5: Partnerships to Promote Homeland SecurityCommunity policing should be a key component of the nation's homeland security efforts. That's just one of more than 40 recommendations found in Partnerships to Promote Homeland Security. This document, Volume 5 in the series, examines issues of notification, general threat warnings, intelligence and data sharing, community policing principles, how resources should be spent, issues of trust, and much more. It briefly outlines local and state enforcement responsibilities, as well as several examples of homeland security collaborations, and it clarifies the challenges law enforcement faces in addressing the threat of terrorism while continuing to handle traditional crimes.By Heather J. Davies, Martha R. PlotkinCategories: Homeland SecurityLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0171Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Nov 2005Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 02:26 (UTC-5) in 0.19 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
No. 10-10803.

#### Battle *v.*United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4812

AMENDMENT
In the Senate of the United States,

August 11, 1994.

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 4812) entitled ‘‘An Act to direct the Administrator of General Services to acquire by transfer the Old U.S.

Mint in San Francisco, California, and for other purposes’’,

do pass with the following

AMENDMENT:

1 Page 2, after line 8 insert:

2 SEC. 2. REPAIRS OF OLD U.S. MINT, SAN FRANCISCO.

3 Nothing in this Act shall be construed to force the Gen4 eral Services Administration to repair the Old U.S. Mint

5 building prior to repairs to other Federal buildings in

6 greater need of repair.

Attest:

Secretary.