alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

[COMPANY LETTERHEAD]

May 3, 2002

United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, DC 20549

Re: Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Grant Geophysical, Inc. has obtained a representation from Arthur
Andersen LLP, dated as of May 3, 2002, that states:

"We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Grant
Geophysical, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and for the
two years then ended and have issued our report thereon dated May 3,
2002. We represent that this audit was subject to our quality control
system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide
reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance
with professional standards, that there was appropriate continuity of
Arthur Andersen personnel working on the audit, availability of
national office consultation, and availability of personnel at foreign
affiliates of Arthur Andersen to conduct the relevant portions of the
audit."


Grant Geophysical, Inc.

By:      /s/ RUSSELL P. DUECK
         --------------------------------------------
         Russell P. Dueck
         Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Air Force 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Air Force, DoD. 

# ACTION:

Notice of intent. 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the provisions of Part 404 of Title 37, Code of Federal Regulations, which implements Public Law 96-517, as amended, the Department of the Air Force announces its intention to grant Hybrid Plastics Inc., a Mississippi corporation, having a place of business at 55 W.L. Runnels Ind. Road, Hattiesburg, MS 39401; two exclusive licenses in any right, title and interest the Air Force has in the following three U.S. Patents: 

*License 1:*                         U.S. Patent 6,362,279, issued 26 March 2002, entitled “Preceramic Additives as Fire Retardants for Plastics”, Joseph D. Lichtenhan and Jeffrey W. Gilman—Inventors.                     

*License 2:*                         U.S. Patent 6,660,823, issued 9 December 2003, entitled “Modifying POSS Compounds”, Joseph D. Lichtenhan, Frank J. Feder and Daravong Soulivong—Inventors.                     

U.S. Patent 6,770,724, issued 3 August 2004, entitled “Altering of POSS Rings”, Joseph D. Lichtenhan, Timothy S. Haddad, Frank J. Feher and Daravong Soulivong—Inventors. 

# DATES:

                        Any objection to the grant of either of the above licenses must be submitted in writing and received within fifteen (15) days from the date of publication of this Notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         in order to be considered.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Written objection should be sent to: Air Force Materiel Command Law Office, AFMCLO/JAZ, 2240 B Street, Room 100, Wright-Patterson AFB OH 45433-7109. Telephone: (937) 255-2838; facsimile (937) 255-3733. 

Bao-Anh Trinh, 

Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 06-7277 Filed 8-30-06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
Dismiss Writ and Opinion Filed September 25, 2013 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01264-CV 

IN RE STEVEN EDMOND LOWE, Relator 

Original Proceeding from 

Dallas County, Texas 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices FitzGerald, Lang, and Myers 

Opinion by Justice FitzGerald 

Before the Court is relator’s petition for writ of mandamus naming the Dallas County 

District Clerk and one of the deputy clerks as respondents. The facts and issues are well known to 

the parties, so we need not recount them herein. This Court does not have mandamus jurisdiction 

over these individuals. See TEX. GOV=T CODE ANN. ' 22.221 (West 2010). Accordingly, we 

DISMISS relator=s petition for a writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction and DENY his motion 

for bench warrant or in the alternative motion for hearing by conference call and his petition for 

expunction of records. 

131264F.P05 

/Kerry P. FitzGerald/ 

KERRY P. FITZGERALD 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
             THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B)
          OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)


     Pursuant  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a)
and  (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Robert
L.  Long,  President  and  Chief  Executive Officer of Transocean Inc., a Cayman
Islands  corporation  (the  "Company"),  hereby  certify, to my knowledge, that:

     (1)  our  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004
          (the  "Report")  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of our operations.

Dated:     August  6,  2004     /s/  Robert L. Long
                                ---------------------
                                Name:  Robert L. Long
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer

     The  foregoing  certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter  63  of  Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of
the  Report  or  as  a  separate  disclosure  document.

     A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to  Transocean  Inc. and will be retained by Transocean Inc. and
furnished  to  the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       50
<PAGE>
§ 80.314 Distress communications. ( a ) The international radiotelephone distress signal consists of the word MAYDAY, pronounced as the French expression “m'aider”.
( b ) These distress signals indicate that a mobile station is threatened by grave and imminent danger and requests immediate assistance.
( c ) The radiotelephone distress call consists of: ( 1 ) The distress signal MAYDAY spoken three times;
( 2 ) The words THIS IS;
( 3 ) The call sign (or name, if no call sign assigned) of the mobile station in distress, spoken three times;
( 4 ) Particulars of the station's position;
( 5 ) The nature of the distress;
( 6 ) The kind of assistance desired; and
( 7 ) Any other information which might facilitate rescue, for example, the length, color, and type of vessel, or number of persons on board.
( d ) The procedures for canceling false distress alerts are contained in § 80.335.
[51 FR 31213, Sept. 2, 1986, as amended at 68 FR 46968, Aug. 7, 2003; 73 FR 4485, Jan. 25, 2008]
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED** **PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Interactive Intelligence, Inc. (the
      "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2007 as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), I, Stephen R. Head, Chief Financial Officer, Vice President of
      Finance and Administration, Secretary and Treasurer of the Registrant, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2,
                fully complies with the  requirements  of section
                13(a) or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The information contained in
                the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects,
                the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Registrant.








/s/
      Stephen R. Head


Stephen
      R. Head


Chief
      Financial Officer, Vice President of Finance and Administration,


Secretary
      and Treasurer


(Principal
      Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)


May
      10,
      2007
Exhibit 99.2
------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 USC, SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the amended  quarterly report of V-Formation,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ended  September  30, 2002, as filed
with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  we,  Richard
Stelnick,  the Company's Chief Executive Officer,  and Robert  Miragliotta,  the
Company's  Chief  Financial  Officer,  certify,  pursuant  to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  Section  1350),  that to the best of our
knowledge:

     1.   The amended  Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information  contained in the amended Report fairly  presents,  in
          all  material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
          operations of the Company.



Dated: November 22, 2002             s/Richard Stelnick
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Richard Stelnick, Chief Executive Officer


Dated: November 22, 2002             s/Robert Miragliotta
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Robert Miragliotta, Chief Financial Officer
§ 80.308 Watch required for subpart T vessels on the Great Lakes. ( a ) Each ship of the United States that is equipped with a radiotelephone station for compliance with subpart T of this part must when underway keep a watch on: ( 1 ) 156.800 MHz on board a vessel 20 meters (65 feet) and over in length, a vessel engaged in towing (See § 80.951(b)), or a vessel carrying more than 6 passengers for hire. This watch must be maintained whenever the station is not being used for authorized traffic. However, a watch on 156.800 MHz need not be maintained by a vessel maintaining a watch on the bridge-to-bridge frequency 156.650 MHz *and* participating in a Vessel Traffic Services (VTS) system and maintaining a watch on the specified VTS frequency.
( 2 ) 156.650 MHz on board a vessel 38 meters (124 feet) and over in length, a vessel engaged in towing (See § 80.951(b)), or a vessel carrying more than six passengers for hire. This watch must be maintained continuously and effectively. Sequential monitoring is not sufficient. Portable VHF equipment may be used to meet this requirement. Vessels are exempted from this requirement while transiting the St. Lawrence Seaway and complying with the Joint Regulations of the St. Lawrence Seaway Authority and St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation between the lower exit of St. Lambert Lock at Montreal and Crossover Island, New York and in the Welland Canal and approaches between Calling in Point No. 15 and No. 16.
( b ) The watch must be maintained by the master, or person designated by the master, who may perform other duties provided they do not interfere with the effectiveness of the watch.
[53 FR 17052, May 13, 1988, as amended at 88 FR 77220, Nov. 9, 2023]
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jones Soda Co. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Peter van Stolk, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company.



|                                      |  |  |  |             
|------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ------------
|/s/ Peter van Stolk                   |  |  |  | May 10, 2007
|Peter van Stolk                       |  |  |  |             
|Chief Executive Officer and President |  |  |  |
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4925 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4925

 To extend for one year the authority of the Bureau of Reclamation to 
        sell certain loans to the Redwood Valley Water District.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 9, 1994

 Mr. Hamburg introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend for one year the authority of the Bureau of Reclamation to 
        sell certain loans to the Redwood Valley Water District.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 2404 of 
the Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4688) is amended by striking ``two'' and inserting ``three''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 11-6199.

#### Lewis *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
No. 11-10144.

#### Bernal Valdez *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-5727.

#### Lester *v.*Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### City of New York, Claimant, *v.*State of New York, Defendant.

(Claim No. 47847.)

Court of Claims,

September 22, 1970.

*J. Lee Rankin, Corporation Counsel (Isidore Reyman*and *Jerome Gilman*of counsel), for claimant. *Louis J. Lefkowits, Attorney-General (Grace K. Banoff*of counsel), for defendant.

*457Sidney Squibb, J.

Claimant moves to vacate and set aside the order and judgment heretofore entered herein. Their predicate was my opinion (61 Misc 2d 517) (a) denying this movant’s motion (M-11543) for summary judgment in its favor against the defendant and (b) granting the defendant’s cross motion (M-11620) to dismiss the claim.

Throughout the voluminous motion papers and legal memoranda on said two motions argued and briefed by capable and experienced lawyers of impressive expertise, at no time was any factual issue raised. For example, in claimant’s first brief, at page 4,1 was told ‘ ‘ The facts are not in dispute. ’ ’ Without intending to overemphasize a single legal principle among others at bar, one is reminded of the declaratory statement by the late Chief Judge Loughean in *Stevenson*v. *News Syndicate Co.*(302 N. Y. 81, 87 [1950]): “ Where, however, all parties to a litigation choose to do so, they may to a large extent chart their own procedural course through the courts *(Matter of Malloy,*278 N. Y. 429).” This legal precept has been utilized by our Appellate Divisions repeatedly, apparently most recently in *Reilly*v. *Insurance Co. of North Amer.*(32 A D 2d 918 [1969]).

Upon considering and reviewing everything presented on this motion and on the two initial motions, I am persuaded that the order and judgment under attack were not erroneous in fact, in law or in the exercise of .sound judicial discretion. This motion is denied.
July 17, 2014



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

MARY L. JAMES , Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 00312

- CV V.

HOUSTON HOUSING AUTH ORITY AND TARANTINO PROPE RTIES, INC.

, Appellee s

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee s , Houston Housing Authority and Tarantino Properties, Inc., signed April 1, 2013, was heard on the transcript of the record.

We have ins pected the record and find that we lack jurisdiction over appellant, Mary L. James’s, appeal from the portion of the judgment awarding possession of the premises to appellees, Houston Housing Authority and Tarantino Properties, Inc. We therefore order tha t portion of the appeal DISMISSED

.

We otherwise find no error in the judgment. We order the remainder of the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We order appellant, Mary L. James, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal.

We further order this decisi on certified below for observance.
- SD 1971
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          -                     [USITC SE-06-051]                

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

United States International Trade Commission. 

# Time and Date:

 September 1, 2006 at 9:30 a.m. 

# Place: 

Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436; Telephone: (202) 205-2000. 

# Status:

 Open to the public. 

# Matters to be Considered:

1. Agenda for future meetings: none. 

2. Minutes. 

3. Ratification List. 

4. Inv. No. 701-TA-442 and 443 and 731-TA-1095-1097 (Final) (Certain Lined Paper School Supplies from China, India, and Indonesia)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on or before September 21, 2006). 

5. Inv. Nos. 731-TA-703 and 705 (Second Review) (Furfuryl Alcohol from China and Thailand)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on or before September 13, 2006). 

6. Outstanding action jackets: none. 

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting. 

Issued: August 17, 2006. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 06-7092 Filed 8-18-06; 11:24 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Exhibit 99.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of AAF-McQuay Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Bruce D. Krueger, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) the annual report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and (2) the information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/BRUCE D. KRUEGERBruce D. Krueger
Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Finance and Accounting Officer) |  | September 13, 2002
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------
|                                                                                                                                     |  |                   

---



QuickLinks
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-10774

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

KENNETH LEE BUGG

Defendant - Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:99-cr-00079

Before STEWART, OWEN and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Kenneth Lee Bugg appeals his sentence of fourteen months’ imprisonment,

followed by thirty-four months of supervised release, because the period of

supervised release exceeds the maximum permissible term by one day. In its

Unopposed Motion to Modify the Judgment and Dismiss the Appeal, the

government concedes that the district court’s sentence exceeds the maximum

term of supervised release permitted under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(h). The

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

March 6, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-10774

2

government asks that we modify the district court judgment by reducing Bugg’s

supervised release term by one day and then dismiss Bugg’s appeal; Bugg agrees

that such a disposition would satisfactorily resolve his appeal. 

Despite the parties’ agreement, we are mindful that determining the

proper sentence for a criminal defendant is a discretionary matter reserved to

the district court. See United States v. Levario-Quiroz, 161 F.3d 903, 908-09 (5th

Cir. 1998). Because the term of supervised release imposed in this case exceeds

the statutory maximum, we VACATE Bugg’s supervised release sentence and

REMAND for re-sentencing in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3583(h).

In light of our decision to vacate and remand,the government’s Unopposed

Motion to Modify the Judgment and Dismiss the Appeal is DENIED.