alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 10-10762.

#### Gibbons *v.*Lee, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-5596.

#### Snow *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Gregory T. Josefsberg

Appellate case number: 01

- 22

- 00604

- CV

Trial court case number: 2018

- 87179

Trial court: 165th District Court of Harris County

Relator Gregory T. Josefsber g f iled a petition for writ of mandamus and a correspond ing

m otion for t emporary re lief to s tay the trial court ’ s order signed on August 12, 2022

, compelling

him to respond to a deposition on written questions pursuant to Tex as Rule of Civil Procedure

202

. W e grant the m oti on for t empor ary r el ief and s tay th e underlying proceedings in Cause

No. 2018

- 87179, In re Rachel Ann Roberts , in the 165 th District Court of Harris County, Texas.

This order will remain in effect until R e lato r ’ s pe tition for writ of mandamus is fin a lly decided or

until furt her order from this Co urt.

The Court requests a response to the petition for writ of mandamus from Real Party in

Interest Rachel Ann Roberts. The response is due S ep t ember 2, 2022.

It is s o ORDER ED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Veronica Rivas

- Molloy

Acting individually

Date: August 22, 2022
§ 90.443 Content of station records. Each licensee of a station in these services shall maintain records in accordance with the following: ( a ) For all stations, the results and dates of the transmitting measurements required by § 90.215 of this part and the name of the person or persons making the measurements.
( b ) For all stations, the dates and pertinent details of any maintenance performed on station equipment, and the name and address of the service technician who did the work. If all maintenance is performed by the same technician or service company, the name and address need be entered only once in the station records.
( c ) For private land stations that are interconnected with the public switched telephone network, the licensee must maintain a detailed description of how interconnection is accomplished. When telephone service costs are shared, at least one licensee participating in the cost sharing arrangement must maintain cost sharing records. A report of the cost distribution must be placed in the licensee's station records and made available to participants in the sharing and the Commission upon request. See § 90.477.
( d ) For shared land stations, the records required by § 90.179.
[43 FR 54791, Nov. 22, 1978, as amended at 48 FR 26621, June 9, 1983; 48 FR 29518, June 27, 1983; 50 FR 39681, Sept. 30, 1985; 50 FR 40976, Oct. 8, 1985; 61 FR 4369, Feb. 6, 1996]
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

In re: 

Victoria Lashell Dordies

Debtor(s)

Case No. 16 B 26589

CHAPTER 13 STANDING TRUSTEE’S FINAL REPORT AND ACCOUNT

Marilyn O. Marshall, chapter 13 trustee, submits the following Final Report and Account 

of the administration of the estate pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1302(b)(1). The trustee declares as 

follows:

1) The case was filed on 08/18/2016.

2) The plan was confirmed on NA .

3) The plan was modified by order after confirmation pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1329 on

NA .

4) The trustee filed action to remedy default by the debtor in performance under the plan 

on NA .

5) The case was Dismissed on 09/26/2016.

6) Number of months from filing to last payment: 0.

7) Number of months case was pending: 3.

8) Total value of assets abandoned by court order: NA .

9) Total value of assets exempted: NA .

10) Amount of unsecured claims discharged without payment: $0.00.

11) All checks distributed by the trustee relating to this case have cleared the bank.

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (9/1/2009)

Case 16-26589 Doc 16 Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 16:45:34 Desc Page 1

 of 3
Receipts:

Total paid by or on behalf of the debtor $0.00

Less amount refunded to debtor $0.00

NET RECEIPTS: $0.00

Expenses of Administration:

Attorney’s Fees Paid Through the Plan $0.00

Court Costs $0.00

Trustee Expenses & Compensation $0.00

Other $0.00

TOTAL EXPENSES OF ADMINISTRATION: $0.00

Attorney fees paid and disclosed by debtor: $0.00

Scheduled Creditors:

Creditor

Name Class

Claim

Scheduled

Claim

Asserted

Claim

Allowed

Int.

Paid

Principal

Paid

Summary of Disbursements to Creditors:

Secured Payments:

Mortgage Ongoing

Mortgage Arrearage

Debt Secured by Vehicle

All Other Secured

TOTAL SECURED:

Priority Unsecured Payments:

Domestic Support Arrearage

Domestic Support Ongoing

All Other Priority

TOTAL PRIORITY:

GENERAL UNSECURED PAYMENTS:

Claim

Allowed

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Principal

Paid

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Interest

Paid

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (9/1/2009)

Case 16-26589 Doc 16 Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 16:45:34 Desc Page 2

 of 3
Disbursements:

Expenses of Administration $0.00

Disbursements to Creditors $0.00

TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS : $0.00

12) The trustee certifies that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 5009, 

the estate has been fully administered, the foregoing summary is true and complete, and all 

administrative matters for which the trustee is responsible have been completed. The trustee 

requests a final decree be entered that discharges the trustee and grants such other relief as may 

be just and proper.

Dated: 11/28/2016

STATEMENT: This Unified Form is associated with an open bankruptcy case, therefore, Paperwork Reduction 

Act exemption 5 C.F.R. § 1320.4(a)(2) applies.

By:/s/ Marilyn O. Marshall

Trustee

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (9/1/2009)

Case 16-26589 Doc 16 Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 16:45:34 Desc Page 3

 of 3
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4948

To designate Building Number 137 of the Tuscaloosa Veterans’ Medical

Center in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, as the ‘‘Claude Harris, Jr. Building’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 12, 1994

Mr. BACHUS of Alabama (for himself, Mr. BEVILL, Mr. BROWDER, Mr. CALLAHAN, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. EVERETT, Mr. HILLIARD, Mr. MONTGOMERY,

Mr. ROWLAND, and Mr. HUTTO) introduced the following bill; which was

referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To designate Building Number 137 of the Tuscaloosa Veterans’ Medical Center in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, as the

‘‘Claude Harris, Jr. Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 Building Number 137 of the Tuscaloosa Veterans’

5 Medical Center in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, shall be known

6 and designated as the ‘‘Claude Harris, Jr. Building’’.

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the building
2

•HR 4948 IH

1 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

2 to the ‘‘Claude Harris, Jr. Building’’.

Æ
Exhibit 23.3




Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Form S-8 (No. 333-07377) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan, in Registration Statement Form S-8 (No. 333-53400) pertaining to the Special Purpose Stock Option Plan, in Registration Statement Form S-8 (No. 333-73000) pertaining to the 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, in Registration Statement Form S-8 (No. 333-73002) pertaining to the 2000 Stock Option Plan, in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 ( No. 333-152706) pertaining to the SPAR Group, Inc. 2008 Stock Compensation Plan  and in Registration Statement Form S-8 (No 333-72998) pertaining to the 2001 Consultant Stock Purchase Plan of SPAR Group, Inc. of our report dated April 15, 2010, with respect to the December 31, 2009 and 2008 consolidated financial statements and schedule of SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, for the year ended December 31, 2009.




/s/ Nagesh Behl & Co.







New Delhi, India


June 25, 2010
§ 80.233 Technical requirements for Automatic Identification System Search and Rescue Transmitters (AIS-SART) equipment. ( a ) Automatic Identification System Search and Rescue Transmitter (AIS-SART) equipment must meet the technical requirements of IEC 61097-14 and IMO Resolution MSC.246(83) (incorporated by reference, *see* § 80.7(b)).
( b ) Prior to submitting a certification application for an AIS-SART device, the following information must be submitted in duplicate to the U.S. Coast Guard, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Ave. SE., Stop 7126, Washington, DC 20593-7126: ( 1 ) The name of the manufacturer or grantee and the model number of the AIS-SART device; and
( 2 ) Copies of the test report and test data obtained from the test facility showing that the device complies with the environmental and operational requirements identified in IEC 61097-14.
( c ) After reviewing the information described in paragraph (b) of this section, the U.S. Coast Guard will issue a letter stating whether the AIS-SART device satisfies all of the requirements specified in IEC 61097-14.
( d ) A certification application for an AIS-SART device must contain a copy of the U.S. Coast Guard letter stating that the device satisfies all of the requirements specified in IEC 61097-14, a copy of the technical test data, and the instruction manual(s).
[81 FR 90747, Dec. 15, 2016]
§ 73.3574 Processing of international broadcast station applications. ( a ) Applications for International station facilities are divided into two groups. ( 1 ) In the first group are applications for new stations, or for major changes in the facilities of authorized stations. A major change is any change in or addition to authorized zones or areas of reception, any change in transmitter location other than one in the immediate vicinity of existing antennas of the station, or any change in power, or antenna directivity. However, the FCC may, within 15 days after the acceptance for filing of any other application for modification, advise the applicant that such application is considered to be one for a major change and therefore is subject to §§ 1.1111 and 73.3580 pertaining to major changes.
( 2 ) The second group consists of applications for licenses and all other changes in the facilities of authorized stations.
( b ) If an application is amended so as to effect a major change as defined in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, or so as to result in an assignment or transfer of control which, in the case of an authorized station, would require the filing of an application therefor on FCC Form 314 or 315 (see § 73.3540), § 73.3580 will apply to such amended application.
( c ) Applications for International stations will be processed as nearly as possible in the order in which they are filed.
[44 FR 38504, July 2, 1979]
exv10w8



 






Exhibit 10.8




Non-Employee Director Compensation (effective January 2, 2006)




Annual Retainer




	 	 	 	 	 
	Service as Director
	 	$	9,000	 
	Service as Chairman of the Board*
	 	$	9,000	 
	Service as Audit Committee Co-Chairman*
	 	$	1,750	 
	Service as Loan Committee Chairman*
	 	$	3,500	 
	Service as ALCO Committee Chairman*
	 	$	3,500	 
	Service as Compensation Committee Chairman*
	 	$	3,500	 








 




			
	*	 	Chairman fees are in addition to the annual retainer and monthly fees received by all
non-employee directors.





Monthly Fees




	 	 	 	 	 
	Directors
	 	$	1,000	 
	Chairman Emeritus
	 	$	250	 






Equity Compensation



Each non-employee director, including the Chairman Emeritus is also eligible to receive
non-qualified stock option awards pursuant to the Alliance Bankshares Corporation Stock Option
Plan, in the discretion of the Compensation Committee.
70

APPENDIX A

TEAM COMPOSITION

To reflect the investigation teamís overall mission

of determining whether ES&H activities and practices

from 1952 to 1990 were consistent with the knowledge,

standards and local requirements applicable at the time

and to identify any ES&H concerns that had not

previously been documented, investigation activities

were organized into two groups: management and

worker safety, and environmental management. Each

group was composed of a group leader and individual

members with relevant expertise. Each group

developed lines of inquiry that guided the evaluation

scope of interest for that group. The specific activities

of the investigation team are discussed in Section 1.3.

The team composition and areas of responsibility

are shown below.

Senior Manager

S. David Stadler, Ph.D.

Team Leader

Patricia Worthington, Ph.D.

Management and Worker Safety Group

Brad Davy - Group Leader

Marvin Mielke, RN

Bill Cooper, CSP

Bill Miller

David Berkey*

Robert Compton*

Ed Stafford*

Al Gibson*

Joseph Lischinsky, CHMM*

Tim Martin, PE*

Jim Lockridge, PE, CIH, CSP*

Environmental Management Group

Bill Eckroade, REM ñ Group Leader

Vic Crawford, PE, REM

Arlene Weiner, REM*

Mario Vigliani, CHP*

William Davis*

Communications and Support

Regina Griego

Mary Anne Sirk

Barbara Harshman

Bob McCallum

Larry McCabe

Quality Review Board

S. David Stadler, Ph.D.

Raymond Hardwick

Thomas Staker

___________________

* Technical Advisor

CIH ñ Certified Industrial Hygienist

CSP ñ Certified Safety Professional

REM ñ Registered Environmental Manager

PE ñ Professional Engineer

RN ñ Registered Nurse

CHP ñ Certified Health Physicist

CHMM ñ Certified Hazardous Materials Manager
#### § 80.201 Scope.

This subpart gives the general technical requirements for the use of frequencies and equipment in the maritime services. These requirements include standards for equipment authorization, frequency tolerance, modulation, emission, power and bandwidth.
No. 11-10008.

#### Hernandez-Beltran *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
### Conditional

approval
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

COLLINS RAY RUSSELL, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 20-30192 

D.C. No. 1:09-cr-00068-SPW-1 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 17, 2021**

Before: FERNANDEZ, BYBEE, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Collins Ray Russell appeals from the district court’s judgment and 

challenges the 30-month sentence imposed upon revocation of his supervised 

release. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Russell’s counsel 

has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

FEB 24 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 20-30192 

withdraw as counsel of record. Russell has filed a pro se supplemental brief. No 

answering brief has been filed. 

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Contrary 

to Russell’s argument in his pro se supplemental brief, the 30-month sentence was 

authorized by the applicable statute and the Guidelines. In addition, the sentence is 

substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) factors and the totality 

of the circumstances, including Russell’s breach of the court’s trust, the need to 

protect the public, and the similarity between the original offense and the conduct 

underlying the revocation. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007);

United States v. Simtob, 485 F.3d 1058, 1062-63 (9th Cir. 2007). The record does 

not support Russell’s remaining pro se arguments. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.
§ 80.953 Inspection and certification. ( a ) Each U.S. flag vessel subject to this subpart must have an inspection of the required radiotelephone installation at least once every 48 months. This inspection must be made while the vessel is in active service or within not more than one month before the date on which it is placed in service.
( b ) An inspection and certification of a ship subject to this subpart must be made by a technician holding one of the following: a General Radiotelephone Operator License, a GMDSS Radio Maintainer's License, a Radiotelegraph Operator License, a Second Class Radiotelegraph Operator's Certificate, or a First Class Radiotelegraph Operator's Certificate. Additionally, the technician must not be the vessel's owner, operator, master, or an employee of any of them. The results of the inspection must be recorded in the ship's radiotelephone log and include: ( 1 ) The date the inspection was conducted;
( 2 ) The date by which the next inspection needs to be completed;
( 3 ) The inspector's printed name, address, class of FCC license (including the serial number);
( 4 ) The results of the inspection, including any repairs made; and
( 5 ) The inspector's signed and dated certification that the vessel meets the requirements contained in this subpart and the Bridge-to-Bridge Act contained in subpart U of this part and has successfully passed the inspection.
( c ) The vessel owner, operator, or ship's master must certify that the inspection required by paragraph (b) of this section was satisfactory.
( d ) The ship's radiotelephone logs containing entries certifying that a Great Lakes safety inspection has been conducted must be retained on board and available for inspection until the next radio inspection.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4875

To amend the Small Business Act to modify requirements relating to the

personal net worth of individuals who may be considered economically

disadvantaged for the purpose of receiving contract awards under section

8(a) of that Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 1, 1994

Mr. MCHALE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Small Business

A BILL

To amend the Small Business Act to modify requirements

relating to the personal net worth of individuals who

may be considered economically disadvantaged for the

purpose of receiving contract awards under section 8(a)

of that Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Minority Business De5 velopment Act of 1994’’.
2

•HR 4875 IH

1 SEC. 2. ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED INDIVIDUALS.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 8(a)(6) of the Small Busi3 ness Act (15 U.S.C. 637(a)(6)) is amended by adding at

4 the end the following:

5 ‘‘(F) The Administration shall not prohibit the owner

6 of a small business concern from qualifying as an economi7 cally disadvantaged individual for the purpose of participa8 tion in the program established under this subsection sole9 ly on the basis of the personal net worth of the owner

10 unless such personal net worth, as computed pursuant to

11 subparagraph (E), exceeds $350,000.’’.

12 (b) REGULATIONS.—The Administrator of the Small

13 Business Administration shall modify regulations issued

14 pursuant to section 8(a) of the Small Business Act to

15 carry out the amendment made by subsection (a) of this

16 section.

Æ
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0718Group Violence Reduction Strategy: 4 Case Studies of Swift and Meaningful Law Enforcement ResponsesThe National Network for Safe Communities' Group Violence Reduction Strategy (GVRS), also known as "Operation Ceasefire," has repeatedly demonstrated that serious violence can be dramatically reduced when law enforcement, community members, and social services providers join together to directly engage with violent street groups to clearly communicate (1) a law enforcement message that future violence will be met with clear and predictable consequences, (2) a community moral message that violence will no longer be tolerated, and (3) a genuine offer of help to those who want it. The strategy's central tool to communicate these messages is a call-in a face-to-face meeting between GVRS representatives and street group members. Practice Brief: Call-In Preparation and Execution is intended to help law enforcement, community, and social services partners already engaged in implementing GVRS to design, prepare, and execute their first and subsequent call-ins.By Sibylle von Ulmenstein, Bonnie SultanCategories: Violent CrimeLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0718Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Oct 2011Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 00:40 (UTC-5) in 0.22 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive