alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 8.3 Conduct-based rules. ( a ) *No blocking.* A person engaged in the provision of broadband internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not block lawful content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices, subject to reasonable network management.
( b ) *No throttling.* A person engaged in the provision of broadband internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not impair or degrade lawful internet traffic on the basis of internet content, application, or service, or use of a non-harmful device, subject to reasonable network management.
( c ) *No paid prioritization.* ( 1 ) A person engaged in the provision of broadband internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not engage in paid prioritization. “Paid prioritization” refers to the management of a broadband provider's network to directly or indirectly favor some traffic over other traffic, including through use of techniques such as traffic shaping, prioritization, resource reservation, or other forms of preferential traffic management, either: ( i ) In exchange for consideration (monetary or otherwise) from a third party; or
( ii ) To benefit an affiliated entity.
( 2 ) The Commission may waive the ban on paid prioritization only if the petitioner demonstrates that the practice would provide some significant public interest benefit and would not harm the open nature of the internet.
( d ) *No unreasonable interference or unreasonable disadvantage standard for internet conduct.* ( 1 ) Any person engaged in the provision of broadband internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not unreasonably interfere with or unreasonably disadvantage: ( i ) End users' ability to select, access, and use broadband internet access service or the lawful internet content, applications, services, or devices of their choice; or
( ii ) Edge providers' ability to make lawful content, applications, services, or devices available to end users.
( 2 ) Reasonable network management shall not be considered a violation of this paragraph (d).
( e ) *Effect on other obligations or authorizations.* Nothing in this part supersedes any obligation or authorization a provider of broadband internet access service may have to address the needs of emergency communications or law enforcement, public safety, or national security authorities, consistent with or as permitted by applicable law, or limits the provider's ability to do so. Nothing in this part prohibits reasonable efforts by a provider of broadband internet access service to address copyright infringement or other unlawful activity.
[89 FR 45554, May 22, 2024. Redesignated at 89 FR 61272, July 30, 2024]
No. 11-9556.

#### Agim *v.*Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-5737.

#### Zapata *v.*Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

             STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)
                   For the years ended June 30, 1998 and 1997

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                1998                  1997
                                                            ----------            -----------
<S>                                                         <C>                   <C>

Net loss                                                    (8,380,000)           $(4,190,000)
                                                            ==========            ===========

Weighted average outstanding common shares                   4,160,000              3,999,005

Increase due to assumed issuance of shares
  related to outstanding stock options issued
  within one year of initial public offering                         0                       0

Increase due to assumed conversion to common
  stock of redeemable convertible preferred
  shares outstanding                                                 0                       0
                                                            ----------            ------------

Adjusted weighted average outstanding common               
  shares and common share equivalents                        4,160,000               3,999,005
                                                            ==========            ============

Net loss per common share and common
  share equivalent                                               (2.01)           $      (1.05)
                                                            ==========            ============
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           8,317
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   64,452
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,603
<INVENTORY>                                    112,862
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               201,079
<PP&E>                                          29,807
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,435
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 482,645
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,764
<BONDS>                                        100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    170,209
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,918
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   482,645
<SALES>                                        269,055
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               269,055
<CGS>                                          176,609
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  255,855
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (235)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,652
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    548
<INCOME-TAX>                                       245
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                303
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       303
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.351 Rules of evidence.

In hearings subject to this subpart B, any oral or documentary evidence may be adduced, but the presiding officer shall exclude irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitious evidence.

[85 FR 63181, Oct. 6, 2020]
No. 11-5805.

#### Williams *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 99


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the annual report of  International  DisplayWorks,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-K for the period  ending  October 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
We,  Stephen C.  Kircher,  Chief  Executive  Officer and Ian  Bebbington,  Chief
Financial Officer, of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to
the best of our knowledge and belief:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



                                                   /S/ STEPHEN C. KIRCHER
Dated: January 27, 2003                            -----------------------------
                                                   Stephen C. Kircher,
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                                   (Principal Executive Officer)



                                                   /S/ IAN BEBBINGTON
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Ian Bebbington,
                                                   Vice President of Finance
                                                   (Principal Financial and
                                                   Accounting Officer)
#### § 90.909 License grants.

EA licenses pursued through competitive bidding procedures will be granted pursuant to the requirements specified in § 1.945 of this chapter.

[67 FR 45377, July 9, 2002]
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Malcolm Skolnick, President and Chief Executive Officer certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of CytoGenix, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: April 15, 2004

/s/ Malcolm Skolnick

Malcolm Skolnick
President & CEO

(Principal Executive Officer)
No. 11-5938.

#### Redding v. United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4942

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for the use of volunteers

for Federal Bureau of Investigation tours and at the Bureau’s training

facilities, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 11, 1994

Mr. WILSON (for himself, Mr. BRYANT, Mrs. MEYERS of Kansas, Mr. ZIMMER, Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts, Mr. THOMAS of California, Mr.

ROYCE, Mr. FROST, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. HASTINGS, Mr.

PARKER, and Mr. EMERSON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for the

use of volunteers for Federal Bureau of Investigation

tours and at the Bureau’s training facilities, and for

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘F.B.I. Volunteer Act

5 of 1994’’.
2

•HR 4942 IH

1 SEC. 2. USE OF VOLUNTEERS BY FBI.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 33 of title 28, United

3 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow4 ing:

5 ‘‘§ 540A. Use of volunteers

6 ‘‘(a) Notwithstanding any other provisions of law, the

7 Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation is author8 ized—

9 ‘‘(1) to solicit, accept, hold, maintain, utilize,

10 and administer personal property (which may not in11 clude cash assistance)—

12 ‘‘(A) obtained by gift, bequest, devise, or

13 otherwise for use at Federal Bureau of Inves14 tigation tour facilities and at those facilities

15 which have as a principal purpose the training

16 of State and local law enforcement personnel;

17 and

18 ‘‘(B) acquired in the name of the United

19 States;

20 ‘‘(2) to recruit, train, and accept the services of

21 individuals or entities, without compensation, as vol22 unteers for or in aid of Federal Bureau of Investiga23 tion tour operations and training facilities; and

24 ‘‘(3) to provide for incidental expenses incurred

25 from such gifts or volunteers.
3

•HR 4942 IH

1 ‘‘(b)(1) Except as otherwise provided by this sub2 section, a volunteer under subsection (a) shall not be

3 deemed a Federal employee and shall not be subject to

4 provisions of law relating to Federal employment, includ5 ing those provisions relating to hours of work, rates of

6 compensation, leave, unemployment compensation, and

7 Federal employee benefits.

8 ‘‘(2) For purposes of chapter 171 of this title (com9 monly referred to as the ‘Federal Tort Claims Act’), a vol10 unteer under this subsection shall be considered an em11 ployee of the Government (as defined in section 2671 of

12 this title).

13 ‘‘(3) For purposes of subchapter I of chapter 81 of

14 title 5, relating to compensation to Federal employees for

15 work injuries, a volunteer under this subsection shall be

16 considered an employee (as defined in section 8101 of title

17 5).’’.

18 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

19 at the beginning of chapter 33 of title 28, United States

20 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new

21 item:

‘‘540A. Use of volunteers.’’.

Æ
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5053

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 5 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Received

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to extend for one

year Water Bank Act agreements that are due to expire

on December 31, 1994.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Water Bank Extension

5 Act of 1994’’.
2

HR 5053 RDS

1 SEC. 2. SPECIAL AUTHORITY TO EXTEND WATER BANK ACT

2 AGREEMENTS.

3 (a) Subject to subsection (b), any agreement entered

4 into under the Water Bank Act (16 U.S.C. 1301 et seq.)

5 and due to expire on December 31, 1994, may be extended

6 for one year under section 6 of the Water Bank Act (16

7 U.S.C. 1305).

8 (b) The authority to extend Water Bank Act agree9 ments under this Act may only be exercised to the extent

10 that the amount available for obligation under the Wet11 lands Reserve Program (16 U.S.C. 1637 et seq.), and the

12 amount used for the extention of Water Bank Act agree13 ments under subsection (a), does not exceed $93,200,000

14 as provided for the Wetlands Reserve Program under the

15 Agricultural, Rural Development, Food and Drug Admin16 istration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1995.

Passed the House of Representatives October 4,

1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
- ok 1978
- ok 1978
- [Untitled]
- ok 1978
Belknap,

No. 4623.

#### State *v.*D. Weldon Thompson.

Argued December 3, 1957.

Decided December 31, 1957.

*Louis C. Wyman,*Attorney General and *David C. Engel,*Law Assistant *{Mr. Engel*orally), for the State.

*Malcolm H. Thompson*(by brief and orally), for the defendant.

Wheeler, J.

The sole question transferred here is whether, as a matter of law, No. 2 fuel oil is an inflammable liquid within the purview of RSA 263:78. This statute does not define or establish a standard to determine the inflammability or “flash point” of No. 2 fuel oil. Under the provisions of RSA 163:4, 5, the State Board of Fire Control is vested with certain duties and responsibilities in enforcing all laws of the state relative to protecting property and persons from fire hazards. Among other duties the Board “shall be responsible for supervising and enforcing all laws of the *209state relative to . . . (g) the transportation, storage and physical handling of flammable liquids which such board believes dangerous to the lives or safety of the citizens of the state.” *S.*4. The Board is further authorized (RSA 153:5) “to adopt and promulgate reasonable standard rules and regulations to accomplish the intent and purposes of this chapter *. ”*See also, RSA 153:14.

Numerous statutes in other jurisdictions have been cited by counsel which set up a definition for flammable liquids, many or all of which would exclude No. 2 fuel oil from the flammable classification. Some of these are concerned with sale, use or storage as distinguished from transportation. These statutes are of little aid here since it is not known what conditions or reasons prompted other legislative bodies to establish a specific classification for inflammable liquids.

A substance is inflammable when it is “Capable of being easily set on fire; combustible *. ... ”*Webster’s New Int. Dictionary (2d *ed.)*1275.

Counsel do not challenge the right of the State Board of Fire Control to “promulgate reasonable standard rules and regulations” but it is argued here that the rule classifying No. 2 fuel oil as inflammable is unreasonable. Since the evidence did not compel a finding of its unreasonableness *(Richardson*v. *Beattie,*98 N. H. 71, 75; *Meredith*v. *State,*94 N. H. 123) by force of the regulation No. 2 fuel oil is as a matter of law inflammable. See *Ferretti*v. *Jackson,*88 N. H. 296, 298.

*Remanded.*

Blandin, J., was absent; the others concurred.
# CIO Certificate Graduate Lawrence Gross Jr. Named FDIC CIO

/ Published Jan. 8, 2016

**iCollege's Alumnus, Lawrence Gross Jr. Appointed as FDIC CIO **

Story at:  https://www.fdic.gov/news/news/press/2015/pr15080.html

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) announced the appointment of Lawrence Gross, Jr., as the agency's Chief Information Officer (CIO). The CIO advises FDIC senior leaders on a range of strategic issues relating to information technology, including governance, investment, program management, strategic planning, and security.

Mr. Gross comes to the FDIC with more than 25 years of combined federal and military service in progressively more responsible technology-related positions. Most recently, Mr. Gross has served as CIO of the Farm Service Agency, a division of the U. S. Department of Agriculture. He previously was Deputy CIO for the Interior Department and Associate CIO for the Treasury Department. In both of these roles, Mr. Gross was responsible for providing executive leadership and policy direction to ensure the effective management and oversight of significant information technology portfolios. Mr. Gross has also worked in the information technology areas of the U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Justice, and U.S. Navy.

Mr. Gross received a bachelor's of science in information systems management at the University of Maryland, University College, and holds a CIO Certification from the National Defense University.

###FDIC Media Contact:Barbara Hagenbaugh(202) 898-7192bhagenbaugh@fdic.gov
COPS Office Photo Contest – March Winner
      
        Drawing Together When Bombs Go Off: Building Community Resilience in the 21st Century
        New Resources for Law Enforcement Leaders on Combating Child Sex Trafficking
        National Efforts with a Focus on Local Agencies: The Presidents Task Force on 21st Century Policing
 
 Subscribe to newsletterSubscribe The Beat The Beat Learning Portal Learning Learning Portal Archives
 New Resource for Law Enforcement Leaders on Combating Child Sex Trafficking On January 28th, the International Association of Chiefs  of Police (IACP) and the Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented  Policing Services (COPS Office) released a new resource: *Combating Child Sex Trafficking: A Guide for  Law Enforcement Leaders*. Child sex trafficking involves a number of  offenses, requiring law enforcement to collaborate with multiple partners to  identify and respond to the child victims while holding accountable those  responsible for their exploitation. Combating this crime requires working with  prosecutors, schools, victim service providers, parole officers, child welfare  agencies, community members, and others. This guide aims to help law  enforcement leaders adopt effective multidisciplinary approaches to address  this crime and provides tips on training, identifying resources, and engaging  communities. This guide also includes descriptions of effective programs in  five law enforcement jurisdictions. To request a copy or view online, visit the COPS  Office Resource Center. 
 **Back to top** COPS Office Photo Contest – March Winner | Drawing Together When Bombs Go Off: Building Community Resilience in the 21st Century | New Resources for Law Enforcement Leaders on Combating Child Sex Trafficking | National Efforts with a Focus on Local Agencies: The President's Task Force on 21st Century Policing
 Privacy Policy US. Department of Justice Legal Policies and Disclaimers Accessibility No FEAR Act Contact Us FAQs lep.gov regulations.gov
#### § 87.419 Supplemental eligibility.

Only one control tower or RCO will be licensed at an airport.

[64 FR 27476, May 20, 1999]