alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT      32 **

**STATEMENT      REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|                                  |                                                                                                                                     |                            |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------|
|                                  |                                                                                                                                     |
|                             |                                                                                                                                |                       |
| Dated:              November 10, 2005 | By:                                                                                                                            | /s/ Angela              Du |
|                                  | Angela                DuDirector,                President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal                Accounting Officer |

|                                  |                                                                                |                                |
|---------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
|                                  |                                                                                |
|                             |                                                                           |                           |
| Dated:              November 10, 2005 | By:                                                                       | /s/ Ernest              Cheung |
|                                  | Ernest                CheungDirector                and Principal Financial Officer |
No. 11-9489.

#### Wade *v.*Pennsylvania.

Super. Ct. Pa. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### Jocelyn Dayao ONTIMARE, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-72351.

Agency No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 11, 2004.*

Decided March 18, 2004.

Stephen Shaiken, Esq., Law Offices aOf Stephen Shaiken, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, San Francisco, CA, Papú Sandhu, Terri Leon-Ben-ner, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before FERNANDEZ, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jocelyn Dayao Ontimare, a native and citizen on the Philippines, petitions this court for review of the summary affir-mance by the Board of Immigration Appeals of an immigration judge’s denial of her applications for asylum and withholding of removal. We deny the petition for review. Because the parties are familiar with the factual and procedural history of this case, we need not recount it here.

The IJ’s decision is supported by substantial evidence. The harm suffered by Ontimare was not sufficient to constitute past persecution within the meaning of immigration law. Being subjected to a work dress code — the only harm that arguably has a governmental nexus — does not qualify as persecution. Because she did not suffer past persecution, she is not entitled to a presumption of a well-founded fear of future persecution under 8 C.F.R. § 208.13(b)(1). The record supports the IJ’s determination that Ontimare’s testimony and the background materials she submitted did not demonstrate a reasonable possibility that her life or freedom would be threatened by a return to the Philippines. Because Ontimare has failed to establish eligibility for asylum, she has failed to meet the “more stringent” standard for withholding of removal. *Al-Harbi v. INS,*242 F.3d 882, 888-89 (9th Cir. 2001).

Ontimare’s due process challenge to the BIA’s summary affirmance is foreclosed by *272*Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft,*350 F.3d 845 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
2098_Lake Road_6_OETM Part III notes.txt

This file contains additional information for the 2098_Lake 

Road_6_Other_Emission_Test_Methods_Part_III.xls

CO Emission Data: Worksheet deleted.

Formaldehyde Emission Data: Worksheet deleted.

CH4 Emission Data: Worksheet deleted.

SO2 Emission Data: Method 6C entered in ERT. Worksheet deleted.

Hg Emission Data 30B: The measured value and the emission rate value in lb/mmBtu are an average of both 

tubes (A&B). The unit 6 boiler is fueled by a blend of 80% subbituminous coal fuel #1 & 20% bituminous 

coal fuel #2 and natural gas fuel #3. The (80%) fuel #1 & (20%) fuel #2 coal feed rates were converted 

to pounds per hour and the value listed is for the start of the run. Since the fuel #3 natural gas feed 

rate units (MCF) are not listed, these values were entered into the 'Other Supporting Information' 

column.

Speciated Volatile Organic HAP: Worksheet deleted.

Speciated Semi-Volatile Organic HAP: Worksheet deleted.

HCN Emission Data: Worksheet deleted.

HCl Emission Data: Worksheet deleted.

HF Emission Data: Worksheet deleted.

NOx Emission Data: Worksheet deleted.

Page 1
#### § 51.401 State authority.

A state commission shall determine whether a telephone company is entitled, pursuant to section 251(f) of the Act, to exemption from, or suspension or modification of, the requirements of section 251 of the Act. Such determinations shall be made on a case-by-case basis.
No. 11-5864.

#### Williams *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
404 A.2d 1349

#### Commonwealth v. Lipsey, Appellant.

*627Submitted March 20, 1978.

Eugene H. Clarke, Jr., for appellant; Eric B. Henson, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

JACOBS, former P. J, and HOFFMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
S i l v i c u l t u r e Best Management Practices 9

Figure 1 (cont.)
10 S i l v i c u l t u r e Best Management Practices

Intermittent streams are those that have a well defined channel but 

maintain only seasonal flow under typical climatic conditions. This includes 

natural streams that have been altered by dredging and/or straightening (see 

Canal Section). For all intermittent streams, the Stringer is required. The 

total SMZ for intermittent streams consists of the Stringer, which occupies the 

immediate stream bank, and the Secondary Zone. The Secondary Zone, like 

the Primary Zone, is measured from the stream, beginning at the break in 

slope at the top of the stream bank, out to the designated width. In addition, 

where the stream is connected to the inflow and/or discharge point of a flowing 

wetland, the Zone extends an additional 50 feet beyond the defined channel into 

the wetland (Figure 4).

All intermittent waterbodies are afforded a Stringer and a Secondary 

Zone of at least 35 feet, regardless of the SSC. However, depending on the 

SSC, an intermittent stream could have a Secondary Zone as wide as 300 feet 

(Appendix 1). Figure 2 shows examples of Secondary Zones on several different 

intermittent streams, each with a different SSC. Note that the total SMZ is 

composed of the Stringer and the Secondary Zone - no Primary Zone applies to 

intermittent streams.

Application of SMZs: Intermittent Streams
Exhibit 3.20

CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION

OF

MTGA GAMING, LLC

1. The name of the limited liability company is MTGA GAMING,
LLC.

2. The address of its registered office in the State of Delaware is: Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange Street, in the City of
Wilmington, Delaware 19801. The name of its registered agent at such address is The Corporation Trust Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of Formation of MTGA GAMING, LLC this 27thday of July,
2007.



By:

/s/ Michael J. CiaccioPrinted Name:

Michael J. CiaccioIts:

Authorized Person
1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 40-F of PolyMet Mining Corp. (“the Company”);
 
 2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.
The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the Company and have:
 
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b)  Designed such internal controls over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 
 (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the Annual Report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
 5.
The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date: March 27, 2018
/s/ Patrick KeenanName: Patrick KeenanTitle: Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
#### § 87.351 Frequency changes.

When the aeronautical utility frequency is required to be changed because of an action by the FAA or the Commission (such as a change in the ground control of unicom frequency) the licensee must submit an application for modification to specify the new frequency within 10 days from the date the station begins operation on the new frequency. The licensee has temporary authority to use the new frequency from the date of the change pending receipt of the modified license.
Editorial Note on Part 74
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 74 appear at 64 FR 4055, Jan. 27, 1999.

§ 74.1234 Unattended operation. ( a ) A station authorized under this subpart may be operated without a designated person in attendance if the following requirements are met: ( 1 ) If the transmitter site cannot be reached promptly at all hours and in all seasons, means shall be provided so that the transmitting apparatus can be turned on and off at will from a point which is readily accessible at all hours and in all seasons.
( 2 ) The transmitter shall also be equipped with suitable automatic circuits which will place it in a nonradiating condition in the absence of a signal on the input channel.
( 3 ) The on-and-off control (if at a location other than the transmitter site) and the transmitting apparatus, shall be adequately protected against tampering by unauthorized persons.
( 4 ) The FCC in Washington, DC, Attention: Audio Division, Media Bureau, shall be supplied by letter with the name, address, and telephone number of a person or persons who may be contacted to secure suspension of operation of the translator promptly should such action be deemed necessary by the Commission. Such information shall be kept current by the licensee.
( 5 ) Where the antenna and supporting structure are required to be painted and lighted under the provisions of Part 17 of this chapter, the licensee shall make suitable arrangements for the daily inspection and logging of the obstruction lighting and associated control equipment as required by §§ 17.47, 17.48, and 17.49 of this chapter.
( b ) An application for authority to construct a new station pursuant to this subpart or to make changes in the facilities of such a station, which proposes unattended operation shall include an adequate showing as to the manner of compliance with this section.
[35 FR 15388, Oct. 2, 1970, as amended at 37 FR 18540, Sept. 13, 1972; 38 FR 25992, Sept. 17, 1973; 60 FR 55484, Nov. 1, 1995; 63 FR 33879, June 22, 1998; 67 FR 13234, Mar. 21, 2002]
- Memorial 201102-ND
[Untitled]
§ 90.281 Restrictions on operational fixed stations in the 421-430 MHz band. ( a ) Except for control stations, operational fixed facilities will not be authorized in the 421-430 MHz band. This does not preclude secondary fixed tone signaling and alarm operations authorized in § 90.235.
( b ) Control stations associated with one or more mobile relay stations will be authorized only on the assigned frequency of the associated mobile station. Use of a mobile service frequency by a control station of a mobile relay system is subject to the condition that harmful interference shall not be caused to stations of licensees authorized to use the frequency for mobile service communications.
[52 FR 6158, Mar. 2, 1987, as amended at 54 FR 38681, Sept. 20, 1989]
#### § 80.161 Operator requirements for subpart T vessels on the Great Lakes.

Each ship subject to subpart T of this part must have on board an officer or member of the crew who holds a marine radio operator permit or higher class license.

[88 FR 77220, Nov. 9, 2023]
No. 11-5852.

#### Hamilton *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 80.861 Required capacity.

If the main power supply or the reserve power supply provided for the purpose of complying with §§ 80.859 and 80.860 consists of batteries, the batteries must have sufficient reserve capacity available at all times while the vessel is leaving or attempting to leave a harbor or port for a voyage in the open sea, and while being navigated in the open sea outside of a harbor or port, to permit operation of the radiotelephone transmitter and the required receivers for at least 6 hours continuously under normal working conditions.
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of NetFabric Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Vasan
Thatham, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





November 4, 2010
              By:
              /s/ Vasan
      ThathamName:
      Vasan ThathamTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
NetFabric Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by NetFabric Holdings, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A)
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S ANNUAL REPORT ON
FORM 10-KSB DATED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FORM 10-KSB DATED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       3,288,781
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,118,198
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (126,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,519,692
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,934,417
<PP&E>                                       1,592,397
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,354,100)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,470,043
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,531,145
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    32,145,894
<OTHER-SE>                                (22,206,996)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,470,043
<SALES>                                     14,672,784
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,672,784
<CGS>                                        7,647,293
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,371,206
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (222,404)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              68,250
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (568,119)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Cite as State v. Murphy , 127 Ohio St.3d 120, 2010-Ohio-5271.]

T HE S TATE OF O HIO , A PPELLEE , v . M URPHY , A PPELLANT . [Cite as State v. Murphy , 127 Ohio St.3d 120, 2010-Ohio-5271.] Cause remanded to the court of appeals for application of State v. Rohrbaugh.

(No. 2009-1309

— Submitted August 10, 2010

— Decided November 2, 2010.)
A PPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Muskingum County, No. CT2008-0067,
2009-Ohio-2690.

__________________ {¶ 1} The cause is remanded to the cour t of appeals for application of
our decision in State v. Rohrbaugh , 126 Ohio St.3d 421, 2010-Ohio-3286, 934 N.E.2d 920, including a determination of wh ether the three conditions set forth in the syllabus of State v. Rohrbaugh were present with regard to appellant’s guilty plea to the amended indictment.
B ROWN , C.J., and P FEIFER , L UNDBERG S TRATTON , O’C ONNOR , O’D ONNELL , L ANZINGER , and C UPP , JJ., concur.

__________________ David A. Sams, for appellant.

______________________
Exhibit 15.4




Head Office: Amot Bituach House

Building B46-48 Menachem Begin Road,

Tel-Aviv 66184Tel: +972 3 638 6868

Fax: +972 3 639 4320E-mail: zivhaft@bdo.co.il

www.bdo.co.il


Securities and Exchange Commission


100 F Street, N.E.


Washington, D.C. 20549




Gentlemen





Re: Lumenis Ltd.




Our firm was engaged as principal accountants to audit the consolidated financial statements of Lumenis Ltd. (the “Registrant”) until the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. We have read Item 16F of the annual report on Form 20-F of the Registrant for the year ended December 31, 2009, and are in agreement with the statements made by the Registrant contained therein as it pertains to our firm.




We have no basis to agree or disagree with any other statements of the Registrant contained in Item 16F.




Very truly yours




/s/ Ziv Haft


Ziv Haft


Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)


A BDO member firm




Tel Aviv, Israel


April 6, 2010
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

August 20, 2009 

d0520 

Order 

 

August 20, 2009 

138260 

DANIEL WIEDYK, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 138260 

 COA: 280214 

Midland CC: 06-009751-NI 

JOHN PAUL POISSON and TRAVERSE 

CITY LEASING, d/b/a HERTZ, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 6, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the 

case of McCormick v Carrier (Docket No. 136738) is pending on appeal before this 

Court and that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present 

application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE 

pending the decision in that case.
#### G. E. Eleazer, J. A. Talton, M. R. Sims, A. B. Moore, et al., *Plaintiffs in Error,*vs. State of Florida, ex rel. Cary D. Landis, Attorney General, *Defendant in Error.*

143 So. 760.

Division B.

Decision filed September 14, 1932.

W. *E. Smith,*for Plaintiffs in Error;

*G. A. Sewage, Jr.,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court he, and the sarnie is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.
# Strategic Insights from Lt Gen Shanahan, Director Joint Artificial Intelligence Center

/ Published Nov. 21, 2019

In this episode of Strategic Insights, the series that brings you thoughts from leaders at the intersection of information, cyberspace, and national security, Lt Gen Jack Shanahan, Director of the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center (JAIC). shares his thoughts on emerging technologies (particularly AI) importance to national security, the importance of DoD pivoting from an industrial / hardware centric model to an information age / software centric organization and the importance of graduate education in cyber and information to build the leaders we need.

CHECK OUT THE VIDEO HERE