alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6105

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WILLIAM CALVIN JOHNSON, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-94-128-A, CA-98-1651-AM) Submitted: May 25, 1999 Decided: June 2, 1999 Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Calvin Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. John Thomas Martin, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on November 25, 1998, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on November 27, 1998. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM: William Calvin Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we denya certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Johnson , Nos. CR-94-128-A; CA-98-1651-AM (E.D. Va. Nov. 27, 1998). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed May 8, 2024.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-1455

Lower Tribunal No. F79-4932

________________

Efren Yero,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An appeal conducted pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 

(1967), from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Alberto Milian, Judge.

Efren Yero, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCALES, GORDO and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANDREW KWASI DONKOR,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, in their official capacity; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 16

- 55829

D.C. No. 2:14

- cv
- 09229

- GW

- DTB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California George H. Wu, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 14, 2017 **

Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.
Andrew Kwasi Donkor appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations in
connection with the alleged seizure of his automobile and other personal property.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

FEB 24 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 55829

We have jurisdict ion under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district

court’s dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) for failure to state a claim. Barren
v. Harrington , 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 1998) (order) . We affirm.

The district cour t properly dismissed Donkor’s action against defendant

Manhattan Beach Tow because Donkor failed to allege facts in his second
amended complaint sufficient to show that Manhattan Beach Tow ’s ac tions

constituted state action. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal , 556 U.S . 662, 678 (2009)
(explaining that “[a] pleading that offers labels and conclusions” or “naked

assertions devoid of further factual enhan cement ” fails to satisfy federal pleading

standards (citation s , internal quotation marks, and alteration omitted)); DeGrassi v.
City of Glendora , 207 F.3d 636, 647 (9th Cir. 2000) (“[B]are allegation[s]” of
“joint action will not overcome a motion to dismiss; the plaintiff must allege facts
tending to show that [defendants] acted under color of state law or authority.”
(citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).
The district court properly dismissed Donko r ’s action against the remaining

defendants because Donkor failed to allege facts in his second amended complaint

sufficient to show t hat Donkor’s constitutional r ights were violated pursuant to a
policy, practice, or custom of a governmental defendant

. See Monell v. Dep’ t of3 16

- 55829

Soc. Servs. , 436 U.S. 658, 69 0

- 91 (1978) (setting forth requirements for municipal
liability) ; see also Castro v. County of Los Angeles , 833 F.3d 1060, 1075 (9th Cir.
2016) (en banc) (municipal liability require s “direct causal link between a
municipal policy or custom and the alleged constitutional deprivation ” (citation
and internal quotatio n marks omitted) ).

AFFIRMED.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 491

To prohibit the imposition of a fee for waiver of the passport requirement

for citizens in the case of reported theft or destruction.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 20, 1993

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

A BILL

To prohibit the imposition of a fee for waiver of the passport

requirement for citizens in the case of reported theft

or destruction.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NO FEE FOR WAIVER OF PASSPORT REQUIRE4 MENT IN CASE OF REPORTED THEFT OR DE5 STRUCTION.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of State may not

7 impose any fee for the waiver, under section 53.2(h) of

8 title 22, Code of Federal Regulations, of the passport re9 quirement for a citizen of the United States under section

10 215 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.
2

•HR 491 IH

1 1185) if the citizen has reported the theft or destruction

2 of the passport to the State Department (either in the

3 United States or abroad) or to the local police.

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (a) shall apply to

5 waivers granted after the date of the enactment of this

6 Act.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   71,270
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,187
<INVENTORY>                                     56,250
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               129,187
<PP&E>                                          58,671
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,081
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 300,168
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          117,180
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           554
<OTHER-SE>                                   (183,540)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   300,168
<SALES>                                         88,546
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                88,546
<CGS>                                           43,837
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   73,127
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,605
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,814
<INCOME-TAX>                                       997
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,817
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,817
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
No. 07-15-00216-CR

James William Nobile

Appellant

v.

The State of Texas

Appellee §

§

§

§ From the County Court at Law No. 1

of Randall County

November 24, 2015

Opinion by Justice Hancock

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated November 24, 2015

, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

It is further ordered that appellant pay all costs in this behalf expended for which

let execution issue.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o
#### § 95.2365 WMTS frequency accuracy.

Manufacturers of wireless medical telemetry devices are responsible for ensuring frequency accuracy such that all emissions are maintained within the designated bands of operation under all of the manufacturer's specified conditions.
Ex-4.19.3 Acceptance of Offer dated Feb 24, 2006



 





Exhibit 4.19.3




[Terra Investments Pte Ltd’s Letterhead]



Our Ref:



Your Ref:




Date: 24 February 2006




Wafer Fab Parks Development Department,

JTC Corporation,

The JTC Summit,

8 Jurong Town Hall Road

Singapore 609434



(Attention: Ms Sharon Wong)



Dear Sirs,



ACCEPTANCE OF OFFER RELATING TO PRIVATE LOT A1964510, WOODLANDS WAFER FAB PARK



We refer to your Letter of Offer and eStatement letter, both dated 16 February 2006 for the
above-mentioned Land and hereby confirm our acceptance of all the terms and conditions of the Offer
and the eStatement letter.



In accordance with your required mode of acceptance mentioned in paragraph 3 of your Offer letter,
we enclose our cheque for S$619,245.50 in favour of JTC Corporation.



Yours faithfully,




/s/

                                        

Name:

For and on behalf of

Terra Investments Pte Ltd




cc: Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing Limited: Mr Desmond Chan / Ms Janet Cun

cc: United PREMAS Limited: Kenneth Tham




Encl. Cheque for S$619,245.50
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Overseas Private Investment Corporation

# TIME AND DATE:

2 p.m., Thursday, September 14, 2006.

# PLACE:

Offices of the Corporation, Twelfth Floor Board Room, 1100 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

Hearing open to the Public at 2 p.m.

# PURPOSE:

Public Hearing in conjunction with each meeting of OPIC's Board of Directors, to afford an opportunity for any person to present views regarding the activities of the Corporation.

# PROCEDURES:

Individuals wishing to address the hearing orally must provide advance notice to OPIC's Corporate Secretary no later than 5 p.m., Friday, September 8, 2006. The notice must include the individual's name, title, organization, address, and telephone number, and a concise summary of the subject matter to be presented.

Oral presentations may not exceed ten (10) minutes. The time for individual presentations may be reduced proportionately, if necessary, to afford all participants who have submitted a timely request to participate an opportunity to be heard.

Participants wishing to submit a written statement for the record must submit a copy of such statement to OPIC's Corporate Secretary no later than 5 p.m., Friday, September 8, 2006. Such statements must be typewritten, double-spaced, and may not exceed twenty-five (25) pages.

Upon receipt of the required notice, OPIC will prepare an agenda for the hearing identifying speakers, setting forth the subject on which each participant will speak, and the time allotted for each presentation. The agenda will be available at the hearing.

A written summary of the hearing will be compiled, and such summary will be made available upon written request to OPIC's Corporate Secretary, at the cost of reproduction.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Information on the hearing may be obtained from Connie M. Downs at (202)                               ( print page 50950)                            336-8438, via facsimile at (202) 218-0136, or via e-mail at                         *cdown@opic.gov.*

Dated: August 24, 2006.

Connie M. Downs,

OPIC Corporate Secretary.

[FR Doc. 06-7215 Filed 8-24-06; 1:14pm]

BILLING CODE 3210-01-M
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4608

To authorize appropriations for the Patent and Trademark Office in the

Department of Commerce for fiscal year 1995, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 21, 1994

Mr. HUGHES (for himself and Mr. MOORHEAD) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To authorize appropriations for the Patent and Trademark

Office in the Department of Commerce for fiscal year

1995, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Patent and Trademark

5 Office Authorization Act of 1994’’.

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF AMOUNTS AVAILABLE TO THE

7 PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE.

8 There is authorized to be appropriated to the Patent

9 and Trademark Office for Salaries and necessary expenses

10 the sum of $107,000,000 for fiscal year 1995, to be de-
2

•HR 4608 IH

1 rived from deposits in the Patent and Trademark Office

2 Fee Surcharge Fund established under section 10101 of

3 the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 (35

4 U.S.C. note).

5 SEC. 3. AMOUNTS AUTHORIZED TO BE CARRIED OVER.

6 Amounts appropriated or made available pursuant to

7 this Act shall remain available until expended.

8 SEC. 4. EMPLOYMENT LEVEL IN PATENT AND TRADEMARK

9 OFFICE.

10 Section 3 of title 35, United States Code, is amended

11 by adding at the end the following new subsection:

12 ‘‘(f)(1) During the 5-year period beginning on Octo13 ber 1, 1994, no reductions may be made in the number

14 of full-time equivalent employees of the Patent and Trade15 mark Office, except to the extent that—

16 ‘‘(A) a law is enacted that requires reductions

17 in personnel or positions specifically in the Patent

18 and Trademark Office, or

19 ‘‘(B) the Commissioner determines that a re20 duction in the number of full-time equivalents is in

21 the best interests of the Patent and Trademark Of22 fice and the public.

23 ‘‘(2) During the 5-year period referred to in para24 graph (1), any law imposing a restriction on hiring by ex25 ecutive agencies, or requiring reductions in force in execu-
3

•HR 4608 IH

1 tive agencies, for the purpose of achieving reductions in

2 the Federal work force shall not apply to the Patent and

3 Trademark Office.

4 ‘‘(3) A law may not be construed as suspending or

5 modifying this subsection, except to the extent such law

6 specifically refers to or amends this subsection.’’.

Æ
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5033

To eliminate the administrative authority to prohibit the possession or transfer

of particular assault weapons.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 13, 1994

Mr. BAKER of Louisiana (for himself, Mr. SARPALIUS, Mr. BARTLETT of

Maryland, Mr. HAMILTON, Mr. MCCLOSKEY, Mr. COMBEST, Mr.

RAMSTAD, Mr. KYL, Mr. STUMP, Mr. FIELDS of Texas, Mr. BARCIA of

Michigan, Mr. HANCOCK, Mr. POSHARD, Mr. GRAMS, Mr. CRANE, Mr.

MYERS of Indiana, Mr. KOLBE, Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas, Mr. CALLAHAN, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. THOMAS of Wyoming, and Mr. GOODLATTE)

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the

Judiciary

A BILL

To eliminate the administrative authority to prohibit the

possession or transfer of particular assault weapons.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE AUTHORITY

4 TO PROHIBIT THE POSSESSION OR TRANS5 FER OF PARTICULAR ASSAULT WEAPONS.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 921(a)(30) of title 18,

7 United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
2

•HR 5033 IH

1 ‘‘(30) The term ‘semiautomatic assault weapon’

2 means—

3 ‘‘(A) any firearm known as—

4 ‘‘(i) Norinco, Mitchell, and Poly Tech5 nologies Avtomat Kalashnikovs (all models);

6 ‘‘(ii) Action Arms Israeli Military Indus7 tries UZI and Galil;

8 ‘‘(iii) Beretta Ar70 (SC–70);

9 ‘‘(iv) Colt AR–15;

10 ‘‘(v) Fabrique National FN/FAL, FN/

11 LAR, and FNC;

12 ‘‘(vi) SWD M–10, M–11, M–11/9, and M–

13 12;

14 ‘‘(vii) Steyr AUG; or

15 ‘‘(viii) INTRATEC TEC–9, TEC–DC9

16 and TEC–22; and

17 ‘‘(B) any revolving cylinder shotgun, such as

18 (or similar to) the Street Sweeper and Striker 12.’’.

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

20 subsection (a) shall take effect as if the amendment were

21 included in subtitle A of title XI of the Violent Crime Con22 trol and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 at the time such

23 subtitle became law.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4974 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4974

To amend the Mississippi River Corridor Study Commission Act of 1989 to 
       extend the term of the commission established by such Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 17, 1994

   Mr. Evans (for himself, Mr. Clay, Mr. Jefferson, Mr. Barlow, Mr. 
  Lipinski, Mr. Leach, Mr. Gutierrez, Mr. Costello, Mr. Oberstar, Mr. 
  Wheat, Mr. Baker of Louisiana Mr. Sangmeister, Mr. Montgomery, Mrs. 
Lloyd, and Mr. Ford of Tennessee) introduced the following bill; which 
           was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Mississippi River Corridor Study Commission Act of 1989 to 
       extend the term of the commission established by such Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TERM OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER CORRIDOR STUDY 
              COMMISSION.

    Section 9(b) of the Mississippi River Corridor Study Commission Act 
of 1989 (Public Law 101-398; 104 Stat. 859) is amended by striking ``3 
years after the date of the first meeting of the Commission,'' and 
inserting ``June 30, 1996,''.
                                 <all>
```
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            College of Information and Cyberspace
                    National Defense University
                CIC
        Search
                    Search CIC:
                        Search
                Search CIC:
                    Search
    Home

    About 
        Mission & Vision

    Faculty & Staff

    Fact Sheet

    Alumni

    Internships

    FAQ

    Admissions 
        Eligibility Requirements

    Admissions Calendar

    Application Instructions

    Apply Online

    International Students

    Academics 
        Graduate Catalog

    M.S. in Strategic Information and Cyberspace Studies
        
        JPME Master's Degree

    Cyber Workforce Master's Degree (Part Time)

    Leadership Development Programs

    Graduate Certificates

    Academic Partners

    Current Students 
        JPME II  Incoming Students

    LDP Incoming Students

    Student Registration

    Bring Your Own Device

    IA Compliance

    Completion Procedures / Order Transcripts

    Student Services and Resources

    Events
    
        Cyber Beacon

    Cyber PME Colloquium

    Hopper Award

    Lecture Series

    CYBERCOM Symposium

    NEWS

    UC2
    
        About

    Events

    Work With Us

    Center for Cybersecurity
    
        About

    Cybersecurity Center POC

    Cybersecurity Supporting Faculty

    CAE-CDE CISO Certificate Program

    Cybersecurity Trending News

    Cyber Labs
        
        Ethical Hacking

    Critical Infrastructure - SCADA

    Cyber Exercises
        
        Tabletop Exercise

    Cyber Competitions

    Cyber Resources and Awareness

    Stakeholder / Industry Advisory Council

    Contact 
        Contact Us

    Directions

    Access to Ft. McNair

    Map of Ft. McNair  Home
  NEWS
  News & Announcements
 News & Announcements News
 Collin College Fifth Place
 
 SHARE
 PRINT
 National Defense University


College of Information and Cyberspace

300 Fifth Ave., Bldg. 62
Fort Lesley J. McNair
Washington, DC 20319-5066

202-685-6300
                    Stay Connected
                
                
                DOD Privacy & Security
 DOD Links Disclaimer
 DOD Social Media Policy
 DOD Web Policy
 FOIA
 NDU System of Records Notice
 NDU Privacy & Security Notice
 No FEAR Act
 Open GOV
 Plain Writing Act
 Section 508
 Small Business Act
 USA.gov
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil