alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interactive Intelligence,Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Stephen R. Head, Chief Financial Officer, Vice President ofFinance and Administration, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully  complies withthe  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The  information  contained in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Stephen R. Head                                                                                                                                             |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Stephen R. Head                                                                                                                                                 |
| Chief Financial Officer, Vice President of Finance and  Administration, Secretary and Treasurer  (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
| May 12, 2004                                                                                                                                                    |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 126 (Thursday, June 29, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 40093]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16518]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6726-9]


Landia Chemical Company Site/Lakeland, Florida; Notice of 
Proposed Settlement

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under sections 104, 106(a), 107 and 122 of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), 
Agrico Chemical Company and PCS Joint Venture, Ltd. (Respondents) 
entered into an Administrative Order on Consent (AOC) with the 
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), whereby Respondents agreed to 
perform response activities at the Landia Chemical Company Site (Site) 
located in Lakeland, Florida. Section VII of the AOC provides for the 
reimbursement of EPA's past response costs by Respondents. Under the 
terms of the AOC, section VII is subject to section 122(i) of CERCLA, 
which requires EPA to publish notice of the proposed settlement in the 
Federal Register for a thirty (30) day public comment period. EPA will 
consider public comments on section VII of the AOC for thirty days. EPA 
may withhold consent to all or part of section VII of the AOC if 
comments received disclose facts or considerations which indicate that 
section VII of the AOC is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. 
Copies of the proposed settlement are available from: Ms. Paula V. 
Batchelor, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV, CERCLA 
Program Services Branch, Waste Management Division, 61 Forsyth Street, 
SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303, (404) 562-8887.
    Written comment may be submitted to Mr. Greg Armstrong at the above 
address within 30 days of the date of publication.

    Dated: June 15, 2000.
Franklin E. Hill,
Chief, CERCLA Program Services Branch, Waste Management Division.
[FR Doc. 00-16518 Filed 6-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
#### § 73.703 Geographical zones and areas of reception.

The zones or areas of reception to be served by international broadcasting stations shall be based on the following map, and directive antennas shall be employed to direct transmissions thereto:

[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER13MY03.047/ER13MY03.047_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER13MY03.047/ER13MY03.047_original_size.png)

[[38 FR 18893](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/38-FR-18893), July 16, 1973, as amended at [68 FR 25538](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/68-FR-25538), May 13, 2003]
§ 73.1943 Political file. ( a ) A licensee shall maintain, and make available for public inspection, a complete record of a request to purchase broadcast time that: ( 1 ) Is made by or on behalf of a legally qualified candidate for public office; or
( 2 ) Communicates a message relating to any political matter of national importance, including: ( i ) A legally qualified candidate;
( ii ) Any election to Federal office; or
( iii ) A national legislative issue of public importance.
( b ) A record maintained under paragraph (a) shall contain information regarding: ( 1 ) Whether the request to purchase broadcast time is accepted or rejected by the licensee;
( 2 ) The rate charged for the broadcast time;
( 3 ) The date and time on which the communication is aired;
( 4 ) The class of time that is purchased;
( 5 ) The name of the candidate to which the communication refers and the office to which the candidate is seeking election, the election to which the communication refers, or the issue to which the communication refers (as applicable);
( 6 ) In the case of a request made by, or on behalf of, a candidate, the name of the candidate, the authorized committee of the candidate, and the treasurer of such committee; and
( 7 ) In the case of any other request, the name of the person purchasing the time, the name, address, and phone number of a contact person for such person, and a list of the chief executive officers or members of the executive committee or of the board of directors of such person.
( c ) When free time is provided for use by or on behalf of candidates, a record of the free time provided shall be placed in the political file.
( d ) All records required by this paragraph shall be placed in the online political file as soon as possible and shall be retained for a period of two years. As soon as possible means immediately absent unusual circumstances.
[57 FR 210, Jan. 3, 1992, as amended at 77 FR 27655, May 11, 2012; 81 FR 10123, Feb. 29, 2016; 85 FR 21078, Apr. 16, 2020; 87 FR 7755, Feb. 10, 2022; 87 FR 33441, June 2, 2022]
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 959/2005

of 23 June 2005         

amending the export refunds on poultrymeat

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2777/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common organisation of the market in poultrymeat (1), and in particular Article 8(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The export refunds on the products listed in Article 1(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2777/75, exported in the natural state, as fixed in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 755/2005 are hereby altered as shown in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 27 June 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 June 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 282, 1.11.1975, p. 77. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 806/2003 (OJ L 122, 16.5.2003, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 126, 19.5.2005, p. 34. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 939/2005 (OJ L 158, 21.6.2005, p. 14).

----

ANNEX

Export refunds on poultrymeat applicable from 27 June 2005

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on June 13, 2006, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), the parties involved in a joint venture regarding review and revision of the current voluntary standard (ANSI/SVIA-1-2001) for four-wheel all-terrain vehicles have filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) The identities of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties are: American Honda Motor Co., Inc., Torrance CA; American Suzuki Motor Corporation, Brea, CA; Arctic Cat Inc., Thief River Falls, MN; Bombardier Recreational Products, Inc., Valcourt, Quebec, Canada; Deere & Company, Moline, IL; Kawasaki Motors Corp., U.S.A., Irvine, CA; Polaris Industries Inc., Medina, MN; and Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A., Cypress, CA. The general areas of the joint venture's planned activities are conducting research and collecting, exchanging and analyzing research information relating to review and revision of the current voluntary standard for four-wheel ATVs (ANSI/SVIA-1-2001).

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 06-6778 Filed 8-8-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
§ 105-74.215 What must I include in my drug-free awareness program? You must establish an ongoing drug-free awareness program to inform employees about— ( a ) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
( b ) Your policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace;
( c ) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs; and
( d ) The penalties that you may impose upon them for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace.
#### The Sackett Plaster Board Company, Appellant, *v.*The Amsterdam Building Company, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

February, 1910.)

Evidence — Opinion evidence — Non-expert evidence — Conclusions of law — Creation of legal relation and duties incident thereto — Agency.

Principal and agent—Actions by and against third person — Evidence.

It is not necessarily error to exclude the question for whom one who signed the contract in suit was acting on the ground that the question calls for the witness’s conclusion and not for a fact, the propriety of the question depending on the circumstances of the particular ease.

*159Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, first district, borough of Manhattan, dismissing the complaint without prejudice to a new action.

Edo E. Mercelis, for appellant.

Robert W. Bernard, for respondent.

Bijur, J.

Plaintiff relied on an exception to the exclusion of the question: “Eor whom was Ruble acting when he signed this contract ? ” it being plaintiff’s endeavor to prove that a contract entered into with the defendant by Ruble in his own name was made by him as agent for the plaintiff.

Questions of this character have frequently been sustained by the Court of Appeals as calling for an answer in respect of a fact rather than a statement of a conclusion. Sweet v. Tuttle, 14 N. Y. 465, 471-472 ; Knapp v. Smith, 27 id. 277, 281; DeWolf v. Williams, 69 id. 621, 622; Kelly v. Doody, 116 id. 575, 583; Frear v. Sweet, 118 id. 454, 459-460; Pichler v. Reese, 171 id. 577, 578; People v. Mingey, 190 id. 51, 64, 66; and the rule was followed in Levy v. Huwer, 80 App. Div. 499.

In but one case (Nicolay v. Unger, 80 N. Y. 54, 56) has the Court of Appeals approved the exclusion of such a question. It has, however, often said that it is but a narrow dividing line which separates the permissible from the obnoxious questions of this character —■ a line to be drawn according to the circumstances of the particular case.

In the case at bar, the correctness of the ruling of the trial judge in excluding the question is confirmed by the fact that, after the exclusion, plaintiff endeavored to prove Ruble’s agency by other testimony but failed to do so, thus demonstrating that the answer to the question, had it been allowed, would have been a statement of a mere conclusion.

Seabuby and Lehman, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
§ 80.251 Scope. ( a ) This subpart gives the general technical requirements for certification of equipment used on compulsory ships. Such equipment includes automatic-alarm-signal keying devices, survival craft radio equipment, radar equipment and Ship Security Alert System (SSAS) equipment.
( b ) The equipment described in this subpart must be certificated.
( c ) The term *transmitter* means the transmitter unit and all auxiliary equipment necessary to make this unit operate as a main or emergency transmitter in a ship station at sea. Each separate motor-generator, rectifier, or other unit required to convert the ship primary power to the phase, frequency, or voltage necessary to energize the transmitter unit is considered a component of the transmitter.
( d ) *Average ship station antenna* means an actual antenna installed on board ship having a capacitance of 750 picofarads and an effective resistance of 4 ohms at a frequency of 500 kHz, or an artificial antenna having the same electrical characteristics.
[51 FR 31213, Sept. 2, 1986, as amended at 63 FR 36606, July 7, 1998; 68 FR 46966, Aug. 7, 2003; 73 FR 4483, Jan. 25, 2008; 76 FR 67612, Nov. 2, 2011]
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 21.1

                 SUBSIDIARIES OF PACIFIC GATEWAY EXCHANGE, INC.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name                                                                                    Jurisdiction of Organization
<S>                                                                                     <C>
Pacific Gateway Exchange (U.K.) Limited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   United Kingdom
Pacific Gateway Exchange (Cyprus) Limited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   Republic of Cyprus
Pacific Gateway Exchange New Zealand Limited  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   New Zealand
Pacific Gateway Exchange (New Zealand) Partnership. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   New Zealand
Pacific Gateway Exchange (Bermuda) Limited  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   Islands of Bermuda
PGE Japan, Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   Japan
Pacific Gateway Exchange (Japan) Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   Delaware
International Exchange Communications, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   Delaware
Rustelnet, a Closed Joint Stock Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   Russian Federation
Onyx Networks, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   Delaware
Pacific Gateway Exchange (Canada) Inc.  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   New Brunswick, Canada
Pacific Gateway Exchange Japan Backhaul, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   Delaware
Japan Backhaul Company, Ltd.  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   Japan
Global Time, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   Delaware
Pacific Gateway Exchange International Limited  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   Ireland
Pacific Gateway Exchange (Germany) GmbH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   Germany
Pacific Gateway Exchange (Switzerland) AG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   Switzerland
Pacific Gateway Exchange (Iberia) SA  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   Spain
Pacific Gateway Exchange (Hamilton) Limited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   Bermuda
Pacific Gateway Exchange (Australia) PTY Limited  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   Australia
Pacific Gateway Exchange (Hong Kong) Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   Hong Kong
Pacific Gateway Exchange (Taiwan) Limited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   Bermuda
Onyx Networks Ltd.  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   Bermuda
Onyx Networks International Limited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   Ireland
Onyx Internet Ltd.  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   United Kingdom
</TABLE>
No. 11-5193.

#### Talbert *v.*West Virginia.

Sup. Ct. App. W. Va. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT  11


                     CE SOFTWARE HOLDINGS, INC., AND SUBSIDIARIES
                STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE (LOSS) EARNINGS
                        (Not Covered by Auditors' Report)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Primary Earnings per Share Information:
                                          	1996	          1995	         1994
<S>                                    <C>            <C>           <C>
 Weighted average
   number of shares
   outstanding during
   the year		                            5,741,078	     5,739,517	   5,561,169

 Annualized additional
   shares due to stock
   options		                                 1,446	         6,262	       1,508

 Annualized additional
   shares due to warrants		                      -	             -	           7 
                                        	5,742,524	     5,745,779	   5,562,684
	
 Net loss		                            $(1,398,567)	     (442,559)  (1,800,993)

Primary loss
  per share	                   	             $(.24)	         (.08)	       (.32)


Fully Diluted Earnings
  per Share Information:
                                           		1996	          1995	         1994
 Weighted average
   number of shares
   outstanding during
   the year		                            5,741,078	     5,739,517	   5,561,657

 Annualized additional
   shares due to stock
   options	                                 	3,015	         8,154	       3,612

 Annualized additional
   shares due to warrants		                      -	              -	          9
	                                       	5,744,093	     5,747,671	   5,565,278
	
 Net loss	                            	$(1,398,567)	     (442,559)  (1,800,993)
 Fully diluted loss
   per share		                               $(.24)	         (.08)	       (.32)

page 39


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 99-11358 Summary Calendar

____________________

LARRY EUGENE SMITH,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BILL LONG, District Clerk Dallas County Texas,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas

(3:99-CV-7-P)

_________________________________________________________________ July 7, 2000 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

At issue is the F ED

. R. C IV

. P. 1 2(b)(6) dismissal of the 42

U.S.C. § 1983 complaint of Larry Eugene Smith against Bill Long, in

his official capacity as District Clerk of Dallas County, Texas.

Smith alleged that: his unsuccessful attempts to purchase a

complete statement of facts from the county clerk’s office resulted

from discriminatory treatment; and without the statement of facts,

he was unable to prepare a habeas application and therefore denied

access to the courts.

A Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal for failure to state a claim is

reviewed de novo

. E .g., Hall v. Thomas

, 190 F.3d 693, 696 (5th- 2 -

Cir. 1999). The complaint is construed liberally in plaintiff’s

favor and the dismissal may be upheld only if “it appears beyond a

d oubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of

his claim which would entitle him to relief”. I d. (quoting Conley

v. Gibson , 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 (1957)).

The district court, considering Smith’s complaint and his

answers to the magistrate judge’s subsequent questionnaire, in the

light most favorable to Smith, concluded Smith did not adequately

“allege discriminatory intent or ... deliberate or intentional

conduct” that would invoke § 1983. S mith v. District Clerk of

Dallas County

, No. 3:99-CV-0007-P, slip op. at 3-4 (N.D. Tex. 1

Nov. 1999). We agree.

AFFIRMED
Datalogic International, Inc.

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

     I, Derek Nguyen, Chief Executive Officer of Datalogic International, Inc.
(the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(a)  the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter
     ended March 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
     1934; and

(b)  the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company.



                                   /s/ Derek Nguyen
Date: May 6, 2004                 ______________________________________
                                  Chief Executive Officer
No. 11-9975.

#### Tucker *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 5040

_____________________________
J USTIN G ANDER , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Ok aloosa County

. Michael Flowers , Judge

. May 2, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
R AY , B ILBREY , and W INOKUR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

______ _______________________ Justin Gander, pro se
, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.