alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4786 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4786

   To convert into a requirement the option of States to deny aid to 
families with dependent children to unmarried minors not living at home 
     or under adult supervision, and narrow the exceptions to the 
 requirement, and to deem to a minor parent all income of the minor's 
      parents who are living in the same home as the minor parent.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 19, 1994

  Mr. Petri introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To convert into a requirement the option of States to deny aid to 
families with dependent children to unmarried minors not living at home 
     or under adult supervision, and narrow the exceptions to the 
 requirement, and to deem to a minor parent all income of the minor's 
      parents who are living in the same home as the minor parent.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STATES REQUIRED TO DENY AID TO FAMILIES WITH DEPENDENT 
              CHILDREN TO UNMARRIED MINORS NOT LIVING AT HOME OR UNDER 
              ADULT SUPERVISION; EXCEPTIONS NARROWED.

    Section 402(a)(43) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
602(a)(43)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``at the option of the State,''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking clause (ii) and 
        redesignating clauses (iii), (iv), and (v) as clauses (ii), 
        (iii), and (iv), respectively.

SEC. 2. INCOME OF MINOR PARENT DEEMED TO INCLUDE ALL INCOME OF MINOR'S 
              PARENTS WHO ARE LIVING IN THE SAME HOME AS THE MINOR 
              PARENT.

    Section 402(a)(39) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
602(a)(39)) is amended by striking ``, to the same extent that the 
income of a stepparent is included under paragraph (31)''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall apply to aid payable for 
months beginning after the calendar month in which this Act is enacted
                                 <all>
```
- IN 1977
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

Safer, Inc.:
     A wholly owned subsidiary of Verdant Brands, Inc., incorporated under the
     laws of the State of Delaware.

Safer, Ltd.:
     A wholly owned subsidiary of Safer, Inc., incorporated under the laws of
     Canada.

Southern Resources, Inc.:
     A wholly owned subsidiary of Verdant Brands, Inc., incorporated under the
     laws of the State of Georgia.

Sureco, Inc.:
     A wholly owned subsidiary of Southern Resources, Inc., incorporated under
     the laws of the State of Georgia.

Peach County Property, Inc.:
     A wholly owned subsidiary of Southern Resources, Inc., incorporated under
     the laws of the State of Georgia.

Consep, Inc.:
     A wholly owned subsidiary of Verdant Brands, Inc., incorporated under the
     laws of the State of Oregon.

Pacoast, Inc. (d/b/a Pacoast Chemical Company; Protech Spray Service; Central
California Ag Service) 
     A wholly owned subsidiary of Consep, Inc., incorporated under the laws of
     the State of California.

Richard Hunt, Inc. (d/b/a Sierra Ag Chemical):
     A wholly owned subsidiary of Consep, Inc., incorporated under the laws of
     the State of California.

Valley Green Center, Inc.:
     A wholly owned subsidiary of Consep, Inc., incorporated under the laws of
     the State of Massachusetts.

Farchan Laboratories, Inc.:
     A wholly owned subsidiary of Consep, Inc., incorporated under the laws of
     the State of Florida.
791 A.2d 214

#### IN THE MATTER OF JOEL B. RUBINSTEIN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

March 7, 2002.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 01-067, concluding that JOEL B. RUBINSTEIN, formerly of MARLTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1990 and who is ineligible to practice law in New Jersey by reason of his failure to comply with *Rule*1:28-2, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for violating *RPC*1.2(a) (failure to abide by a client’s decision concerning the objectives of the representation), *RPC*1.3 (lack of diligence), and *RPC*5.5(a) (failure to maintain a *bona fide*office), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JOEL B. RUBINSTEIN is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months and until the further Order of the Court, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the, period of suspension and that respondent comply with *Rule*1:20-20; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 166 (Monday, August 28, 2006)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 51093]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7221]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 166 / Monday, August 28, 2006 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 51093]]


                Notice of August 24, 2006

                
Intention To Enter Into a Free Trade Agreement 
                With Colombia

                Consistent with section 2105(a)(1)(A) of the Trade Act 
                of 2002, I have notified the Congress of my intention 
                to enter into a free trade agreement with the Republic 
                of Colombia.

                Consistent with section 2105(a)(1)(A) of that Act, this 
                notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

                    (Presidential Sig.)B

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    August 24, 2006.

[FR Doc. 06-7221
Filed 8-25-06; 8:45 am]
Billing code 3190-01-M
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed May 8, 2024

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D 2 3

- 1 455

Lower Tribunal No. F79

- 4932

________________

Efren Yero

, Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida

, Appellee.

An appeal conducted pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738
(1967), from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Alberto Milian , Judge.

Efren Yero

, in proper person

.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General , for appellee

.

Before SCAL E S

, GORDO and L OBR E E

, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4846

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the unearned

income of children attributable to personal injury awards shall not be

taxed at the marginal rate of the parents.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 28, 1994

Mr. BOEHLERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

that the unearned income of children attributable to personal injury awards shall not be taxed at the marginal

rate of the parents.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TAX TREATMENT OF UNEARNED INCOME OF

4 CHILDREN ATTRIBUTABLE TO PERSONAL

5 INJURY AWARDS.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (4) of section 1(g) of

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to taxation

8 of unearned income of minor children at parent’s rate) is
2

•HR 4846 IH

1 amended by redesignating subparagraph (B) as subpara2 graph (C) and by inserting after subparagraph (A) the

3 following new subparagraph:

4 ‘‘(B) EXCEPTION FOR UNEARNED INCOME

5 ATTRIBUTABLE TO PERSONAL INJURY

6 AWARDS.—There shall not be taken into ac7 count under subparagraph (A)(i) any income

8 attributable to an amount excluded from the

9 gross income of the child by reason of section

10 104(a)(2).’’

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

12 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

13 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
§ 73.4255 Tax certificates: Issuance of. ( a ) See Public Notice, FCC 76-337, dated April 21, 1976. 59 FCC 2d, 91; 41 FR 17605, April 27, 1976.
( b ) See Report and Order MM Docket 87-267, FCC 91-303 adopted, September 26, 1991. 6 FCC Rcd 6273; 56 FR 64842, December 12, 1991.
[56 FR 64874, Dec. 12, 1991, as amended at 59 FR 52087, Oct. 14, 1994]
- ALL
RI 2016 1
ALL.pdf
- RI 2016 7
- RI 2016 8
- RI 2016 9
- RI 2016 10
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 27, 2010 

y0419 

Order 

 

April 27, 2010 

140358 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140358 

 COA: 288217 

Lake CC: 08-004622-FH 

DONALD NELSON CLEMENS, JR, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 19, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### § 73.4097 EBS (now EAS) attention signals on automated programing systems.

See Public Notice dated March 1, 1979. 72 FCC 2d 788; 44 FR 17792, March 23, 1979.

[49 FR 50049, Dec. 26, 1984, as amended at 59 FR 67103, Dec. 28, 1994]
exv10w8



 





Exhibit 10.8




FIRST AMENDMENT

TO

CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT




     This First Amendment (“First Amendment”) to the Consulting Services Agreement between the
Parties (as defined below) dated September 15, 2005 (“Consulting Agreement”) is dated and effective
January 1, 2007 (“First Amendment Effective Date”) by and between Hythiam, Inc. (“Hythiam”) and
David E. Smith & Associates (“Consultant”) (each a “Party” and collectively, the “Parties”).



     WHEREAS, the Parties wish to amend the Consulting Agreement to provide for an increase in
Consultant’s compensation.



     NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the mutual covenants and agreements
set forth in this First Amendment, the Parties agree as follows:


1. The Parties hereby amend Section 3 of the Consulting Agreement to replace the amount $3,800 with
the amount $4,167.



3. Except as amended by this First Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the Consulting
Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. In the event that any terms or
conditions of the Consulting Agreement are inconsistent with the terms of this First Amendment, the
provisions of this First Amendment shall control. Any reference to the Consulting Agreement from
and after the First Amendment Effective Date shall mean the Consulting Agreement as amended by this
First Amendment.



The Parties have executed this First Amendment by their duly authorized representatives whose
signatures appear below.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Hythiam, Inc.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	BY:
	 	     /s/ ANTHONY M. LAMACCHIA
 

	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	     Anthony M. LaMacchia, Senior Executive Vice President	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	David E. Smith & Associates	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	BY:
	 	     /s/ DAVID E. SMITH
 

	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	     David E. Smith, M.D., President
# UPDATED - Certificate Applications Now Closed for this Academic Year

/ Published May 11, 2016

**UPDATED - CERTIFICATE APPLICATIONS ARE NOW CLOSED UNTIL THE FALL OF 2016!**************************PREVIOUS POSTING - Certificate Applications accepted until May 27 for this Academic Year.

Applications for Certificate Programs will be closing on 5/27/16 for the Academic Year 2015-2016. All application materials (particularly supervisor concurrence) received on, or before June 10, 2016 will be considered for rolling admission 3-4 weeks after submission. 

Applications for the CIO-LDP will remain open until the advertised close date of June 15, 2016 for the Fall cohort.

Questions should be directed to the Office of Student Services at iCollegeOSS@ndu.edu or 202-685-6300.  

George Fulda, Ed.D.

Director Office of Student Services and Institutional Research

iCollege

National Defense University

Ft. McNair, DC  20319

202.685.4880
#### § 87.193 Scope of service.

Transmissions by emergency locator transmitters (ELTs) are intended to be actuated manually or automatically and operated automatically as part of an aircraft or a survival craft station as a locating aid for survival purposes.
Form of Term Sheet for 2007 Incentive Compensation Plan



 Exhibit 10.3 
 MANTECH INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION 
 Executive Term Sheet 
 For 2007 Incentive Compensation Plan 
 [Date] 
 [Name]: 
 The
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”) has determined that you are eligible to participate in the Company’s 2007 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”). Your participation shall be
subject to the terms and conditions of this Term Sheet and the Plan. A copy of the Plan is attached to this Term Sheet. All capitalized terms in this Term Sheet have the meanings ascribed to them in the Plan. 
 Target Award. The Committee has established a Target Award for you of [xx]% of your base salary. The Target Award is the amount of
incentive compensation that you will earn if 100% of your Participant Goals are achieved. 
 Calculation of Incentive Compensation. A
calculation worksheet is attached to this Term Sheet as Exhibit A. Also included on the calculation worksheet are your Participant Goals and weighting factors, as approved by the Committee. The amount of incentive compensation you earn, if
any, will be determined by multiplying your Business Unit Performance Score by the Company Performance Score, which shall yield a Final Score. The Final Score shall then be converted into an Award Percentage using the conversion table included on
Exhibit A. The Award Percentage will then be multiplied by your base salary to yield the incentive compensation payment earned hereunder. 
  

	 	•	 	 If either the Business Unit Performance Score or the Company Performance Score does not meet or exceed 90%, then no incentive compensation will be paid hereunder.



  

	 	•	 	 The maximum total incentive compensation that you can earn hereunder is an amount equal to [xx]% of your Target Award. 


  

	 	•	 	 Any incentive compensation payments earned will be paid in accordance with the provisions of the Plan and the Company’s practices, in a lump sum cash payment
after the financial results for 2007 have been finally determined. 


 Unless the Committee, in its discretion, determines
otherwise, your rights to receive the incentive compensation earned hereunder will be forfeited if you are not still an employee of the Company on December 31, 2007. Consistent with the terms of the Plan, the Committee may adjust the incentive
compensation earned hereunder in its discretion if it deems an extraordinary reason exists (in its sole discretion). Notwithstanding anything else herein, no incentive compensation earned hereunder shall be paid until formally approved by the
Committee. The Company will withhold an appropriate amount from such incentive compensation for the payment of all applicable withholding taxes. 
  

			
	ManTech International Corporation
		
	 By:
	 	  

	Title:	 	  



 Term Sheet for Business Unit Executive
No. 11-1125.

#### Flint *v.*Whalin, Magistrate Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
[Civ. No. 2341.

Second Appellate District.

March 26, 1918.]

#### CONSTANTINO V. BORBA et al., Respondents, v. JOSE DE MELLO, Appellant.

Appeal — Alternative Method—Printing op Eecord in Briefs.— Where an appeal is taken under the alternative method, the parties must print in their briefs such portions of the record as they desire t'o call to the attention of the appellate court, and references to the transcript are not sufficient.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County. J. A. Allen, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Bradley *&*Bradley, for Appellant.

G. W. Zartman, for Respondents.

THE COURT.

Defendant in this case appeals from an adverse judgment and presents his appeal by the alternative method. In the briefs filed by counsel no attempt is made to comply with the provisions of section 953c of the Code of Civil Procedure, which require that the parties in presenting an appeal by the method mentioned shall print *602in their brief such portions of the record as they desire to call to the court’s attention. Numerous references are made to the pages of the transcript filed, but it has been repeatedly held that the appellate courts will not examine the transcript documents in order to determine whether there is merit in the contentions made by the appellant. Many opinions of this court and the supreme court reiterate the rule. A collection of the cases so holding will be found grouped in the case of *Barker Bros.*v. *Joos et al., ante,*p. 311, [171 Pac. 1085], Not having properly before us sufficient of the record to illustrate the various contentions made on behalf of the appellant, we are compelled to hold that no error is shown as against the judgment.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.
208P16

#### State v. Joshua Earl Holloman

1. State’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA15-1042)

1. Allowed 05/27/2016

2. State’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

*2.*

3. State’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

3.
No. 11-9708.

#### Chande *v.*Holder, Attorney General.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### McCARTY et al. v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13261.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 13, 1951.

Charles W. Greer, Birmingham, Ala., for appellant.

John D. Hill, U. S. Atty., and William L. Hogue, Asst. U. S. Atty., Birmingham, Ala., for the United States.

Before McCORD, BORAH and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants complain that the evidence has been misstated in our former opinion, wherein . we held that the Government showed its good faith by a reasonable effort to minimize the damages “under a new contract with other parties at a rate of 5^ per man per month.”

It is true that the contract in question does not expressly so provide. But it is without dispute that the amount realized under the new contract was 50 per man per month. Moreover, appellants further admit that both the General Accounting Office and the trial court assumed that the contract carried- the rate suggested, and the jury was charged to that effect. Under such circumstances, we are constrained to adhere to our former opinion, and the petition for rehearing is hereby

Denied.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 159 (Thursday, August 17, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 47503]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6963]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the National Cancer Institute Director's Consumer Liaison Group.
    The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to 
space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in 
advance of the meeting.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Director's Consumer 
Liaison Group.
    Date: October 25, 2006.
    Time: 7:30 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: (1) Meeting with NCI Acting Director; (2) Updates on NCI 
Programs; (3) Update on NCI Budget and Legislation; Report from NCI 
Listens and Learns Working Group and DCLG Summit Working Group; (4) 
Public Comment; (5) Action Items and Conclusion.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, 45 
Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Barbara Guest, Executive Secretary, Office of 
Liaison Activities, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes 
of Health, 6116 Executive Blvd., Room 2202, Rockville, MD 20892-
8324, 301-496-0307, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2f485a4a5c5b4d6f424e46430141464701484059"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="42253727313620022f232b2e6c2c2b2a6c252d34">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person. Information is also available 
on the Institute's/Center's home page: http://deainfo.nci.nih.gov/advisory/dclg/dclg.htm, where an agenda and any additional 
information for the meeting will be posted when available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS).

    Dated: August 8, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-6963 Filed 8-16-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 11-9471.

#### Hofelich *v.*Hawaii et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 95.1955 Transmitter effective radiated power limitation.

The effective radiated power (ERP) of each CTS and RTU shall be limited to the minimum necessary for successful communications. No CTS or fixed RTU may transmit with an ERP exceeding 20 Watts. No mobile RTU may transmit with an ERP exceeding 4 Watts.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Abdel Jabbar Abouelouafa, Chief Executive Officer of BIMS Renewable Energy, Inc. (the Registrant) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Date: August 19, 2003



/s/ Abdel Jabbar Abouelouafa

________________________________________________

Chief Executive Officer
No. 11-10005.

#### Hudson *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.