alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P334Preventing and Addressing Bullying and Intolerance: A Guide for Law EnforcementThis guide is intended to be a primary resource for law enforcement officers who play a large role in helping to educate and support children and adults about: the problems resulting from bullying, teasing, and all forms of bias; ways to prevent and intervene in bullying situations; and how to break cycles of bullying and transform student behavior. It includes key definitions of bullying and intolerance, concrete strategies for law enforcement to partner with school leaders, and ideas for police officers, school and community leaders, and students to collaborate and take action together. Also featured are anecdotes from the Not In Our School campaign, an ongoing commitment to empower students to create safe and inclusive environments. The background information and strategies presented apply to young people from all ethnic groups and genders, and all ages, from preschool to high school.By Becki Cohn-VargasCategories: School and Campus SafetyLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p334Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFBook • Oct 2015Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 04:29 (UTC-5) in 0.88 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                    SUBSIDIARIES OF CITYSCAPE FINANCIAL CORP.
                                DECEMBER 31, 1998

The following is a list of the Company's subsidiaries which are all owned 100%
by Cityscape Financial Corp. who is the ultimate or immediate parent:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                                                                  INCORPORATED IN
------------------                                                                  ---------------
<S>                                                                                 <C>
A.     Cityscape Corp.                                                                  New York

         1.       Cityscape Funding Corporation                                         Delaware

         2.       Cityscape Funding Corporation II                                      Delaware

         3.       Cityscape Funding Corporation III                                     Delaware

         4.       Cityscape Funding Corporation IV                                      Delaware

         5.       Cityscape Funding Corporation V                                       Delaware

         6.       City Mortgage Corporation Limited                                     United Kingdom

                        a. City Mortgage Servicing Limited                              United Kingdom

                        b. City Mortgage Financial Services Limited                     United Kingdom

                        c. J&J Securities Limited                                       United Kingdom

                        d. City Mortgage Collateral Reserve No. 1 Limited               United Kingdom

                        e. Greyfriars Group Limited                                     United Kingdom

                           I.       Greyfriars Financial Services Limited               United Kingdom

                                    i.      Assured Funding Corporation Limited         United Kingdom

                                    ii.     Cityscape (UK) Limited                      United Kingdom

                                    iii.    Midland Continuation Limited                United Kingdom

                                    iv.     Home and Family Finance Limited             United Kingdom

                                    v.      Home Funding Corporation Limited            United Kingdom

                                    vi.     Home Mortgage Corporation Limited           United Kingdom

                                    vii.    Home Mortgages Limited                      United Kingdom

                                    viii.   Homestead Finance Limited                   United Kingdom

                                    ix.     Homeowners Capital Plan Limited             United Kingdom

                                    x.      Mortgage Management Limited                 United Kingdom

                                    xi.     Secured Funding Limited                     United Kingdom
</TABLE>
[Crim. No. 264.

Third Appellate District.

October 27, 1914.]

#### THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. LEO MANDAL, Appellant.

Criminal Law—Pimping—Lack op Error.—On this appeal it is held-that the defendant was properly charged with the offense of “pimping,” and that the evidence was sufficient, and that no prejudicial error was committed.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County and from an order refusing a new trial. N. D. Arnot, Judge presiding.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

*630Martin I. Welsh, for Appellant.

U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, and J. Charles Jones, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.

BURNETT, J.

On this appeal we have not been favored with any argument, oral or written. Nevertheless, we have examined the record and we find that defendant was properly charged with the offense designated in the statute as “pimping,” that sufficient evidence of his guilt was received and that no prejudicial error was committed during the trial. The judgment and order are therefore affirmed.

Chipman, P. J., and Hart, J., concurred.
#### § 73.593 Subsidiary communications services.

The licensee of a noncommercial educational FM station is not required to use its subcarrier capacity, but if it chooses to do so, it is governed by §§ 73.293 through 73.295 of the Commission's Rules regarding the types of permissible subcarrier uses and the manner in which subcarrier operations shall be conducted; *Provided,* however, that remunerative use of a station's subcarrier capacity shall not be detrimental to the provision of existing or potential radio reading services for the blind or otherwise inconsistent with its public broadcasting responsibilities.

[48 FR 26615, June 9, 1983]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7332
WILBERT THOMAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GEORGE TRENT, Warden, Mount Olive CorrectionalComplex, in his individual and personal capacity; SUZANNE CANTRELL, Business Manager, Mount Olive Correctional Complex, in her individual and personal capacity; JANICE MORGAN, Trustee Clerk, Mount Olive Correctional Complex, in her individual and personal capacity; BECKY L. MOORE, Trustee Clerk, Mount Olive Correctional Complex, in her individual and personal capacity, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, District Judge. (CA-95-1099-5) Submitted: February 27, 1997 Decided: March 11, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wilbert Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Darrell V. McGraw, Jr., RondaGunter, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.23 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Thomas v. Trent , No. CA-95- 1099-5 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 1, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 90.248 Wildlife and ocean buoy tracking. ( a ) The frequency bands 40.66-40.70 MHz and 216-220 MHz may be used for the tracking of, and the telemetry of scientific data from, ocean buoys and animal wildlife.
( b ) Transmitters operating under the provisions of this section are not subject to the technical standards contained in §§ 90.205-90.217. In lieu thereof, the transmitters shall comply with the provisions in this section.
( c ) Classes of emission are limited to N0N, A1A, A2A, A2B, F1B, J2B, F2A, F2B, and/or F8E.
( d ) The authorized bandwidth shall not exceed 1 kHz.
( e ) *Frequency stability.* ( 1 ) For transmitters operating in the 40.66-40.70 MHz frequency band, the frequency stability shall be sufficient to ensure that, at the carrier frequency employed, the sum of the authorized bandwidth plus the bandwidth required for frequency stability are confined within this band.
( 2 ) In the 216-220 MHz frequency band, transmitters shall employ a minimum frequency stability of 0.005 percent (50 parts per million). The carrier frequency shall be selected to ensure that the sum of the authorized bandwidth plus the bandwidth required for frequency stability are confined within this band.
( 3 ) The frequency stability standards shall be met over a temperature range of −30° to + 50° centigrade at normal supply voltage and for a variation in the primary supply voltage from 85% to 115% of the rated supply voltage at a temperature of + 20 °C. For battery operated equipment, the equipment tests shall be performed using a new battery.
( f ) The maximum peak transmitter output (carrier) power shall not exceed 1 milliwatt for airborne wildlife applications, 10 milliwatts for terrestrial wildlife applications or 100 milliwatts for ocean buoys.
( g ) Emissions appearing outside of the authorized bandwidth shall be attenuated below the carrier power by at least 26 dB, following the procedures specified in § 90.210(m).
[63 FR 64208, Nov. 19, 1998]
# The Chancellor's Speaker Series 2021

/ Published Nov. 17, 2021
17th of November, 2021,
§ 80.501 Supplemental eligibility requirements. ( a ) A private coast station or a marine utility station may be granted only to a person who is: ( 1 ) Regularly engaged in the operation, docking, direction, construction, repair, servicing or management of one or more commercial transport vessels or United States, state or local government vessels; or is
( 2 ) Responsible for the operation, control, maintenance or development of a harbor, port or waterway used by commercial transport vessels; or is
( 3 ) Engaged in furnishing a ship arrival and departure service, and will employ the station only for the purpose of obtaining the information essential to that service; or is
( 4 ) A corporation proposing to furnish a nonprofit radio communication service to its parent corporation, to another subsidiary of the same parent, or to its own subsidiary where the party to be served performs any of the eligibility activities described in this section; or is
( 5 ) A nonprofit corporation or association, organized to furnish a maritime mobile service solely to persons who operate one or more commercial transport vessels; or is
( 6 ) Responsible for the operation of bridges, structures or other installations that area part of, or directly related to, a harbor, port or waterway when the operation of such facilities requires radio communications with vessels for safety or navigation; or is
( 7 ) A person controlling public moorage facilities; or is
( 8 ) A person servicing or supplying vessels other than commercial transport vessels; or is
( 9 ) An organized yacht club with moorage facilities; or is
( 10 ) A nonprofit organization providing noncommercial communications to vessels other than commercial transport vessels.
( b ) Each application for station authorization for a private coast station or a marine utility station must be accompanied by a statement indicating eligibility under paragraph (a) of this section.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information  extracted from the Balance
Sheets for URBANFIND, INC. at November 30, 2000 (unaudited) and the Statement of
Operations for the nine month period ended  November 30, 2000 (unaudited) and is
qualified  in its entirety by reference to  such financial statements.

</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-2000
<CASH>                                          59,033
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                62,633
<PP&E>                                           8,739
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (491)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  70,881
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              100
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           443
<OTHER-SE>                                      70,338
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    70,881
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (53,053)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (51,136)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (51,136)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (51,136)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.01)








</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

 CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zap.Com Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Leonard DiSalvo, as
the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 to the best of my knowledge, that:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
        Company.

/s/ Leonard DiSalvo
-------------------
Leonard DiSalvo
Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer
May 5, 2005

This Certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

                                       17
No. 10-1104.

#### Minneci et al. *v.*Pollard et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 563 U. S. 987.] Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae*and for divided argument granted.
Dispute Resolution Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 DISPUTE RESOLUTION AGREEMENT 
 This DISPUTE
RESOLUTION AGREEMENT is made this 12th day of March 2007 (“Agreement”) by and between BioDelivery Sciences
International, Inc. (“BDSI”) and CDC IV, LLC (“CDC”). 
 WHEREAS,
BDSI and CDC entered into the Clinical Development and License Agreement, dated July 14, 2005 (as amended, the “CDLA”), pursuant to which CDC has provided funding to BDSI for the clinical development of a certain BEMATM Fentanyl product (“BEMATM Fentanyl”); 
 WHEREAS, BDSI and CDC are currently engaged in dispute resolution
procedures pursuant to the CDLA for certain matters arising thereunder (the “Disputed Matters”); and 
 NOW, THEREFORE, IN
CONSIDERATION of the foregoing, the mutual understandings and promises contained in this Agreement, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by BDSI and CDC, BDSI and CDC hereby agree
that the dispute resolution procedures for the Disputed Matters are hereby terminated, without prejudice. 
  

							
	CDC IV, LLC	 	BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc.
				
	By:	 	David Ramsay, Authorized Signatory	 	By:	 	Mark A. Sirgo, President and CEO
				
		 	 /s/ David Ramsay
	 		 	 /s/ Mark A. Sirgo

		
	Date: March 12, 2007	 	Date: March 12, 2007
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5003

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow certain expenses

for overnight camps to qualify for the credit and exclusion relating

to dependent care expenses.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 19, 1994

Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow certain expenses for overnight camps to qualify for the

credit and exclusion relating to dependent care expenses.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN EXPENSES FOR OVERNIGHT CAMPS

4 TO QUALIFY FOR DEPENDENT CARE-RELAT5 ED BENEFITS.

6 (a) CREDIT.—The last sentence of subparagraph (A)

7 of section 21(b)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986

8 (relating to expenses for household and dependent care

9 services necessary for gainful employment) is amended by
2

•HR 5003 IH

1 inserting before the period ‘‘to the extent the amount paid

2 for such services for any week does not exceed $46.15’’.

3 (b) EXCLUSION.—Paragraph (1) of section 129(e) of

4 such Code (relating to dependent care assistance pro5 grams) is amended by inserting before the period ‘‘, deter6 mined by substituting ‘$96.15’ for ‘$46.15’ in the last sen7 tence of subparagraph (A) thereof’’.

8 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

9 this section shall apply to services provided after Decem10 ber 31, 1993.

Æ
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0767Good to Great Policing: Application of Business Management Principles in the Public SectorThis publication takes the core principles articulated by Jim Collins in his best-selling book Good to Great and applies them to law enforcement. The result is based not only on Good to Great, but also on a 1-day executive session, funded by COPS, that brought together a group of leaders from the public sector. By reading this document, leaders will learn more about the application of principles that can move their organizations to a higher level of effectiveness.By Chuck Wexler, Mary Ann Wycoff, Craig FisherCategories: Police OperationsLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0767Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Jun 2007Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 02:32 (UTC-5) in 0.23 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
Agreement



 Exhibit 10.2 
 December 29, 2006 
 Mr. Alan B. Miller 
 President 
 UHS of Delaware, Inc. 
 367 South Gulph Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406 
 Dear Alan: 
 The Board of Trustees of Universal Health Realty Income Trust, at their December 1, 2006 meeting, authorized the renewal of the current Advisory
Agreement between the Trust and UHS of Delaware, Inc. (“Agreement”) upon the same terms and conditions. 
 This letter constitutes
the Trust’s offer to renew the Agreement, until December 31, 2007, upon the same terms and conditions. Please acknowledge UHS of Delaware’s acceptance of this offer by signing in the space provided below and returning one copy of this
letter to me. 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	/s/ Charles F. Boyle
	Vice President and
	Chief Financial Officer


  

	cc:	Warren J. Nimetz, Esq. 


	  	Cheryl K. Ramagano 

  

			
	Agreed to and Accepted:
	
	UHS OF DELAWARE, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Alan B. Miller
		 	President