alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 80.963 Main power supply. ( a ) A main power supply must be available at all times while the vessel is subject to the requirements of this subpart.
( b ) Means must be provided for charging any batteries used as a source of energy. A device which during charging of the batteries gives a continuous indication of charging current must be provided.
§ 25.272 General inter-system coordination procedures. ( a ) Each space station licensee in the Fixed-Satellite Service shall establish a satellite network control center which will have the responsibility to do the following: ( 1 ) Monitor space-to-Earth transmissions in its system (thus indirectly monitoring uplink earth station transmissions in its system) and
( 2 ) Coordinate transmissions in its satellite system with those of other systems to prevent harmful interference incidents or, in the event of a harmful interference incident, to identify the source of the interference and correct the problem promptly.
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) The transmitting earth station licensee shall provide the operator(s) of the satellites, on which the licensee is authorized to transmit, contact telephone numbers for the control center of the earth station and emergency telephone numbers for key personnel; a current file of these contacts shall be maintained at each satellite system control center.
( d ) An earth station licensee shall ensure that each of its authorized earth stations complies with the following: ( 1 ) The earth station licensee shall ensure that there is continuously available means of communications between the satellite network control center and the earth station operator or its remote control point as designated by the licensee.
( 2 ) The earth station operator shall notify the satellite network control center and receive permission from the control center before transmitting to the satellite or changing the basic characteristics of a transmission.
( 3 ) The earth station operator shall keep the space station licensee informed of all actual and planned usage.
( 4 ) Upon approval of the satellite network control center, the earth station operator may radiate an RF carrier into the designated transponder. Should improper illumination of the transponder or undue adjacent transponder interference be observed by the satellite network control center, the earth station operator shall immediately take whatever measures are needed to eliminate the problem.
( 5 ) The space station licensee may delegate the responsibility and duties of the satellite network control center to a technically qualified user or group of users, but the space station licensee shall remain ultimately responsible for the performance of those duties.
[58 FR 13421, Mar. 11, 1993, as amended at 62 FR 5931, Feb. 10, 1997; 78 FR 8431, Feb. 6, 2013; 79 FR 8325, Feb. 12, 2014]
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 502

To prohibit the expenditure of Federal funds on metric system highway

signing.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 21, 1993

Mr. DARDEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Public Works and Transportation

A BILL

To prohibit the expenditure of Federal funds on metric

system highway signing.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. METRIC SYSTEM SIGNING.

4 (a) PLACEMENT OF SIGNS.—No Federal funds may

5 be expended to construct, erect, or otherwise place any

6 sign relating to any speed limit, distance, or other meas7 urement on any highway if such sign establishes such

8 speed limit, distance, or other measurement using the met9 ric system unless Congress, after the date of the enact10 ment of this Act, specifically authorizes such expenditure.
2

•HR 502 IH

1 (b) MODIFICATION OF SIGNS.—No Federal funds

2 may be expended to modify any sign relating to any speed

3 limit, any distance, or any other measurement on any

4 highway for the conversion of such sign to the metric sys5 tem unless Congress, after the date of the enactment of

6 this Act, specifically authorizes such expenditure.

7 (c) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of subsections (a)

8 and (b), the following definitions apply:

9 (1) HIGHWAY.—The term ‘‘highway’’ has the

10 meaning such term has under section 101 of title

11 23, United States Code.

12 (2) METRIC SYSTEM.—The term ‘‘metric sys13 tem’’ has the meaning the term ‘‘metric system of

14 measurement’’ has under section 4 of the Metric

15 Conversion Act of 1975 (15 U.S.C. 205c).

16 (d) NONAPPLICABILITY TO PUERTO RICO.—This sec17 tion shall not apply to the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

Æ
#### ALCATEL USA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 03-1518.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 5, 2004.

ORDER

The parties having so agreed, it is

*407ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R.App. P. 42(b).
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 496

To amend the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 1930, to prevent

the imputation to cooperatives of conduct by their members and affiliates

for the purposes of the prohibition relating to labelling of certain

commodities.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 21, 1993

Mr. CONDIT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To amend the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act,

1930, to prevent the imputation to cooperatives of conduct by their members and affiliates for the purposes

of the prohibition relating to labelling of certain commodities.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Perishable Agricultural

5 Commodities Amendment Act of 1992’’.
2

•HR 496 IH

1 SEC. 2. CERTAIN CONDUCT OF MEMBERS AND AFFILIATES

2 NOT TO BE IMPUTED TO COOPERATIVES.

3 Section 2 of the Perishable Agricultural Commodities

4 Act, 1930, is amended—

5 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—’’ before

6 ‘‘It shall be unlawful’’; and

7 (2) by adding at the end the following:

8 ‘‘(b) SPECIAL RULE RELATING TO COOPERATIVES.—

9 A cooperative association, as defined in section 15(a) of

10 the Agricultural Marketing Act, shall not be deemed to

11 have violated subsection (a)(5) by reason of the conduct

12 of a member or affiliate of that cooperative association.’’.

Æ
#### Dennis H. Smith, *Plaintiff in Error,*vs. State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

143 So. 789.

Decision filed October 3, 1932.

*Joe Hill Williams,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Cary D. Landis,*Attorney General, and *Boy Campbell,*Assistant, for the State.

Per Curiam.

In this cause Mr. Chief Justice Buford, Mr. Justice Whitfield and Mr. Justice Terrell are of opinion that the judgment herein should be affirmed, while Mr. Justice Ellis, Mr. Justice Brown and Mr. Justice Davis are of *902opinion that the said judgment should be reversed. When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the judgment should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the judgment should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 27 So. R. 51, that the judgment of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Buford, C.J. and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.
§ 64.633 Procedures for resolution of unauthorized changes in default provider. ( a ) *Notification of alleged unauthorized provider change.* Original default providers who are informed of an unauthorized default provider change by an iTRS user shall immediately notify the allegedly unauthorized provider and the Commission's Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau of the incident.
( b ) *Referral of complaint.* Any iTRS provider that is informed by an iTRS user or original default provider of an unauthorized default provider change shall: ( 1 ) Notify the Commission's Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, and
( 2 ) Shall inform that iTRS user of the iTRS user's right to file a complaint with the Commission's Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau. iTRS providers shall also inform the iTRS user that the iTRS user may contact and file a complaint with the alleged unauthorized default provider. An original default provider shall have the right to file a complaint with the Commission in the event that one of its respective iTRS users is the subject of an alleged unauthorized default provider change.
( c ) *Notification of receipt of complaint.* Upon receipt of an unauthorized default provider change complaint or notification filed pursuant to this section, the Commission will notify the allegedly unauthorized provider and the Fund administrator of the complaint or notification and order that the unauthorized provider identify to the Fund administrator all minutes attributable to the iTRS user after the alleged unauthorized change of default provider is alleged to have occurred. The Fund administrator shall withhold reimbursement for such minutes pending Commission determination of whether an unauthorized change, as defined by § 64.601(a) of this part, has occurred, if it has not already done so.
( d ) *Proof of verification.* Not more than 30 days after notification of the complaint or other notification, the alleged unauthorized default provider shall provide to the Commission's Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau a copy of any valid proof of verification of the default provider change. This proof of verification must clearly demonstrate a valid authorized default provider change, as that term is defined in §§ 64.631 through 64.632 of this part. The Commission will determine whether an unauthorized change, as defined by § 64.601(a) of this part, has occurred using such proof and any evidence supplied by the iTRS user or other iTRS providers. Failure by the allegedly unauthorized provider to respond or provide proof of verification will be presumed to be sufficient evidence of a violation.
[78 FR 40609, July 5, 2013]
MUSA SHABAZZ,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D13-2046

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 3, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Dawn Caloca-Johnson, Judge.

Baya Harrison, III, Monticello, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Virginia Harris, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

THOMAS, ROBERTS, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 29, 2010 

s0322 

Order 

 

March 29, 2010 

140178 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140178 

 COA: 286322 

Muskegon CC: 07-055336-FC 

DEQUAN IAHSELLE BUCHANAN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 19, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

EDWARD AUSTIN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-983

[September 17, 2020]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; John J. Murphy, III, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 92-13147 CF10A.

David W. Collins of Collins Law Firm, Monticello, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 11-6198.

#### Tibbs *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 10.13


     AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT OF RICK L. WESSEL


      This is  the  First Amendment  ("First  Amendment") to  the  Employment
 Agreement  of  Rick L. Wessel  entered  into  as of  December 31,  2004 (the
 "Agreement"), by  and  between First  Cash  Financial  Services,  Inc.  (the
 "Company"), a Delaware  corporation, and Rick  L. Wessel (the  "Executive").
 This First Amendment shall apply prospectively and is effective as of  March
 9, 2007.

      WHEREAS, Executive is presently employed by the Company pursuant to the
 Agreement  between  the  parties  (said  Agreement  including  all  previous
 amendments and/or addenda,  if any), and  the parties desire  to modify  the
 Agreement as set forth below.

      NOW,  THEREFORE,  in   consideration  of  the   mutual  covenants   and
 obligations  hereinafter   set   forth,   and  other   good   and   valuable
 consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby  acknowledged,
 the parties agree as follows:

      1.   In paragraph 3(a)  of the Agreement,  after the term  "President,"
 insert the phrase "and Chief Executive Officer ("CEO")."

      2.   In  the  first  sentence  of   paragraph  3(c),  after  the   word
 "President," insert the phrase "and CEO."  In the last sentence of paragraph
 3(c), after the word "President," insert the phrase "and CEO."

      3.   In paragraph 7 of the Agreement, after the term "$550,000," insert
 the phrase "through  December 31,  2005, $605,000  from January  1, 2006  to
 December 31, 2006, and $700,000 beginning January 1, 2007."

      4.   Except  as  modified herein,  the remainder of the Agreement shall
 remain unchanged.

      EXECUTIVE ACKNOWLEDGES  THAT  HE  HAS BEEN  GIVEN  THE  OPPORTUNITY  TO
 DISCUSS THIS FIRST AMENDMENT WITH HIS PRIVATE LEGAL COUNSEL AND HAS  AVAILED
 HIMSELF OF THAT OPPORTUNITY.


 FIRST CASH FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.           EXECUTIVE


 By:_____________________________              ______________________________
    Phillip E. Powell                          Rick L. Wessel
    Chairman of the Board
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-CD023Recruitment, Hiring, and Retention Resources for Law Enforcement CDNationwide, it has been increasingly difficult to find and retain talented police officers. This CD is designed to assist chiefs and sheriffs, as well as other executives, in finding, training, and retaining qualified staff.Categories: Hiring, Recruitment, and RetentionLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-cd023Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:CD • Jan 2008Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 00:48 (UTC-5) in 0.27 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER  SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I,
Victor J. Salerno, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of American Wagering, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and the internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date: May 7, 2010

/s/ VICTOR J. SALERNO Interim Principal Accounting Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)


---



QuickLinks
§ 78.20 Acceptance of applications; public notice. ( a ) Applications which are tendered for filing are dated upon receipt and then forwarded to the Media Bureau where an examination is made to ascertain whether the applications are complete. Applications found to be complete or substantially complete, are accepted for filing and are given a file number. In case of minor defects as to completeness, the applicant will be required to supply the missing information. Applications which are not substantially complete will be returned to the applicant. Applications requiring fees as set forth at part 1, subpart G, of this chapter must be filed in accordance with § 0.401(b) of this chapter.
( b ) Acceptance of an application for filing means only that it has been the subject of a preliminary review by the Commission's administrative staff as to completeness. Applications which are determined to be clearly not in accordance with the Commission's rules or other requirements, unless accompanied by an appropriate request for waiver, will be considered defective and will not be accepted for filing, or if inadvertently accepted for filing, will be dismissed. Requests for waiver shall show the nature of the waiver or exception desired and shall set forth the reasons in support thereof.
( c ) The Commission will give public notice of all applications and major amendments thereto which have been accepted for filing. No application shall be acted on less than thirty (30) days from the date of public notice.
[37 FR 15926, Aug. 8, 1972, as amended at 52 FR 10231, Mar. 31, 1987; 67 FR 13235, Mar. 21, 2002; 68 FR 27004, May 19, 2003]
#### § 78.106 Interference to geostationary-satellites.

Applicants and licensees must comply with § 101.145 of this chapter to minimize the potential of interference to geostationary-satellites.

[68 FR 12776, Mar. 17, 2003]
Exhibit 99.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of AAF-McQuay Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Ho Nyuk Choy, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) the annual report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the
information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/HO NYUK CHOYHo Nyuk Choy
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |  | September 13, 2002
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------

---

QuickLinks
- Memorial 201101-ND
[Untitled]
- LA 1st page
- Pg. 1
- Pg. 2
- Pg. 3
§ 87.3 Other applicable rule parts. Other applicable CFR title 47 parts include: ( a ) Part 0 contains the Commission's organizations and delegations of authority. Part 0 also lists Commission publications, standards and procedures for access to Commission records and location of Commission monitoring stations.
( b ) *Part 1* contains rules of practice and procedure for license applications, adjudicatory proceedings, rule making proceedings, procedures for reconsideration and review of the Commission's actions; provisions concerning violation notices and forfeiture proceedings; and the environmental processing requirements that, together with the procedures specified in § 17.4(c) of this chapter, if applicable, must be complied with prior to the initiation of construction.
( c ) Part 2 contains the Table of Frequency Allocations and special requirements in international regulations, recommendations, agreements, and treaties. This part also contains standards and procedures concerning marketing of radio frequency devices, and for obtaining equipment authorization.
( d ) Part 13 contains information and rules for the licensing of commercial radio operators.
( e ) *Part 17* contains requirements for construction, marking and lighting of antenna towers, and the environmental notification process that must be completed before filing certain antenna structure registration applications.
( f ) Part 80 contains rules for the maritime services. Certain maritime frequencies are available for use by aircraft stations for distress and safety, public correspondence and operational communications.
[53 FR 28940, Aug. 1, 1988, as amended at 77 FR 3955, Jan. 26, 2012]