alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 11-10134.

#### Springer *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk *1033is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin*v. *District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U. S. 1 (1992) *(per curiam).*

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
No. 10-11043.

#### Nestor *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-40045

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

OMAR LOYA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:13-CR-8-1

Before DAVIS, ELROD, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Omar Loya has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Loya has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed 

to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Loya’s claim of ineffective assistance of 

counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 24, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-40045 Document: 00512945787 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/24/2015
No. 14-40045

collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir.), cert. 

denied, 135 S. Ct. 123 (2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein, as well as Loya’s response. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 14-40045 Document: 00512945787 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/24/2015
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4743

To provide that carriage of an item of equipment to be used under a Federal

contract for cleaning up radioactive waste from the production of nuclear

weapons is not coastwise trade.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 13, 1994

Mr. KINGSTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To provide that carriage of an item of equipment to be

used under a Federal contract for cleaning up radioactive

waste from the production of nuclear weapons is not

coastwise trade.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TRANSPORTATION OF ITEM OF EQUIPMENT TO

4 BE USED FOR CLEAN UP OF NUCLEAR WEAP5 ONS PRODUCTION WASTE.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Transportation described in sub7 section (b) shall not be considered to be coastwise trade

8 for purposes of section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act,
2

HR 4743 IH

1 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the Act of June 19, 1886

2 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), section 12106 of title 46, United

3 States Code, and any other law prohibiting engagement

4 in coastwise trade by a vessel that is constructed in a for5 eign country, documented under the laws of a foreign

6 country, or owned by a person that is not a citizen of the

7 United States.

8 (b) TRANSPORTATION DESCRIBED.—Transportation

9 referred to in subsection (a) is carriage by vessel from a

10 point near Oakland, California, to a point near Brunswick,

11 Georgia, in the period beginning July 1, 1994, and ending

12 December 1, 1994, of a Bowen spray dryer to be used

13 under a contract between Westinghouse Savannah River

14 Company and the Department of Energy in cleaning up

15 radioactive waste from the production of nuclear weapons

16 at the Savannah River Plant site, South Carolina.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on January 6, 2006, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Interchangeable Virtual Instruments Foundation, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Advantest Corporation, Tokyo, Japan; and Honeywell Tech Solutions, Bangalore, India have withdrawn as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Interchangeable Virtual Instruments Foundation, Inc. intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On May 29, 2001, Interchangeable Virtual Instruments Foundation, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on July 30, 2001 (66 FR 39336).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on July 20, 2005. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on August 12, 2005 (70 FR 47232).                

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 06-721  Filed 1-25-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
§1350

In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report of ION Geophysical Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gregory J. Heinlein, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                                                  
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 26, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Gregory J. Heinlein                          
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Gregory J. Heinlein                              
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 938/2005

of 20 June 2005         

fixing Community producer and import prices for carnations and roses with a view to the application of the arrangements governing imports of certain floricultural products originating in Jordan

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4088/87 of 21 December 1987 fixing conditions for the application of preferential customs duties on imports of certain flowers originating in Cyprus, Israel, Jordan, Morocco and the West Bank and the Gaza Strip (1), and in particular Article 5(2)(a) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The Community producer and import prices for uniflorous (bloom) carnations, multiflorous (spray) carnations, large-flowered roses and small-flowered roses as referred to in Article 1 of Regulation (EEC) No 4088/87 shall be as set out in the Annex hereto for the period from 22 June to 5 July 2005.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 June 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 382, 31.12.1987, p. 22. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1300/97 (OJ L 177, 5.7.1997, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 72, 18.3.1988, p. 16. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2062/97 (OJ L 289, 22.10.1997, p. 1).

(3)OJ L 346, 31.12.2003, p. 65.

(4)OJ L 345, 31.12.2003, p. 117.

(5)OJ L 2, 5.1.2005, p. 4.

----

ANNEX

----
§ 80.303 Watch on 156.800 MHz (Channel 16). ( a ) During its hours of operation, each coast station operating in the 156-162 MHz band and serving rivers, bays and inland lakes except the Great Lakes, must maintain a safety watch on the frequency 156.800 MHz except when transmitting on 156.800 MHz.
( b ) A coast station is exempt from compliance with the watch requirement when Federal, State, or Local Government stations maintain a watch on 156.800 MHz over 95% of the coast station's service area. Each licensee exempted by rule must notify the nearest district office of the U.S. Coast Guard at least thirty days prior to discontinuing the watch, or in the case of new stations, at least thirty days prior to commencing service. The Coast Guard may require any coast station to maintain the watch temporarily or permanently. The Coast Guard may also require any coast station to remain capable of either immediately resuming the watch or providing the Coast Guard direct dial-up access to the necessary 156.800 MHz transceiver at no charge so that the Coast Guard can maintain the watch.
( c ) If the government station(s) providing the 156.800 MHz watch over the service area of an exempt station temporarily discontinues that watch, the exempt coast station upon receiving notice of this condition must maintain the watch on 156.800 HMz during the discontinuance. Automated maritime communications systems' compliance with this requirement is limited to the use of existing facilities.
[51 FR 31213, Sept. 2, 1986, as amended at 52 FR 35245, Sept. 18, 1987; 63 FR 40063, July 27, 1998]
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Angel AcquisitionCorp., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the periodended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brent Fouch, Treasurer, PrincipalAccounting Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

|                     |   |                                                            |   |
|--------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Dated:      May 19, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Brent      Fouch                             |   |
|                     |   | Brent      Fouch                                                |   |
|                     |   | Treasurer,      Principal Accounting  Officer and Director |   |
|                     |   |                                                            |   |

 

----
exv10w29



 








Exhibit 10.29




Third Wave Technologies, Inc. 2007 Incentive Plan



On February 21, 2007, the compensation committee of the board of directors of Third Wave
Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) approved the Company’s incentive plan for 2007. Based on the
Company’s performance against established performance measures and individual performance against
individual performance measures, participants, including the Company’s executives, will be eligible
to receive from 0% to 200% of his or her target annual incentive award. The Company performance
objectives measured under the plan are net cash from operations, total revenue and certain product
development and other milestones.
- nh 1973
§ 80.1065 Applicability. ( a ) The regulations contained within this subpart apply to all passenger ships regardless of size and cargo ships of 300 tons gross tonnage and upwards.
( b ) The requirements of this subpart do not modify the requirements for ships navigated on the Great Lakes or small passenger boats. The requirements contained in subpart T of this part continue to apply. The requirements contained in part III of title III of the Communications Act continue to apply (see subpart S of this part).
( c ) No provision in this subpart is intended to prevent the use by any ship, survival craft, or person in distress, of any means at their disposal to attract attention, make known their position and obtain help.
[57 FR 9065, Mar. 16, 1992, as amended at 60 FR 58245, Nov. 27, 1995; 60 FR 62927, Dec. 7, 1995; 73 FR 4489, Jan. 25, 2008; 88 FR 77224, Nov. 9, 2023]
No. 11-5985.

#### Brown *v.*Steward, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 80.1067 Inspection of station. ( a ) Ships must have the required equipment inspected at least once every 12 months by an FCC-licensed technician holding a GMDSS Radio Maintainer's License. If the ship passes the inspection the technician will issue a Safety Certificate. Safety Certificates may be obtained from the Commission's National Call Center at 1-888-CALL FCC (1-888-225-5322). The effective date of the ship Safety Certificate is the date the station is found to be in compliance or not later than one business day later. The FCC-licensed technician must use the latest FCC Information Bulletin, How to Conduct a GMDSS Inspection, which may be obtained at *http://www.fcc.gov*.
( b ) Certificates issued in accordance with the Safety Convention must be posted in a prominent and accessible place on the ship.
[57 FR 9065, Mar. 16, 1992, as amended at 63 FR 29660, June 1, 1998; 80 FR 53752, Sept. 8, 2015]
Order entered September 13, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01153-CV

JORGE FRANCISCO LOPEZ, M.D. AND COLUMBIA HOSPITAL 

AT MEDICAL CITY DALLAS SUBSIDIARY, L.P. D/B/A 

MEDICAL CITY DALLAS HOSPITAL, Appellants

V.

MARTHA AND FELIX SALAZAR, Appellees

On Appeal from the 95th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-14349-H

ORDER

The Court has before it appellants’ September 11, 2013 joint unopposed motion for 

extension of time to file briefs of appellants. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS

appellants to file their briefs by October 1, 2013.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
No. 11-5732.

#### Chaplin *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 11

STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION
 OF PER SHARE EARNINGS



|                                                         |  | For
 theThree Months EndedSeptember 30,2002 |            | For
 theThree Months EndedSeptember 30,2001
|-------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------- | ---------- | -------------------------------------------
|                                                         |  |                                             |            |                                            
|Net loss                                                 |  | $                                           | (23,250    | )                                          
|Actual outstanding common shares at beginning
 of period |  |                                             | 50,004,474 |                                            
|Weighted basic shares                                    |  |                                             | 50,004,474 |                                            
|Weighted diluted shares                                  |  |                                             | 50,004,474 |                                            
|Basic and diluted loss per share                         |  | $                                           | 0.00       |                                            



|                                                        | For theNine Months
 EndedSeptember 30,2002 |            | For theNine Months
 EndedSeptember 30,2001
|------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------ | ---------- | ------------------------------------------
|                                                        |                                            |            |                                           
|Net loss                                                | $                                          | (113,416   | )                                         
|Actual outstanding common shares at beginning of period |                                            | 50,004,474 |                                           
|Weighted basic shares                                   |                                            | 50,004,474 |                                           
|Weighted diluted shares                                 |                                            | 50,004,474 |                                           
|Basic and diluted loss per share                        | $                                          | 0.00       |                                           

17
§ 64.2333 Burden of proof. ( a ) In any future proceeding arising under section 222(e) of the Communications Act or § 64.2309, the burden of proof will be on the carrier to the extent it claims its internal subscriber list information systems cannot accommodate the delivery time, delivery schedule, unbundling level, or format requested by a directory publisher.
( b ) In any future proceeding arising under section 222(e) of the Communications Act or § 64.2309, the burden of proof will be on the carrier to the extent it seeks a rate exceeding $0.04 per listing for base file subscriber list information or $0.06 per listing for updated subscriber list information.
EXHIBIT 99.5
                           CERTIFICATION OF TREASURER

I, Leon M. Caldwell, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Y3K Secure Enterprise
Software, Inc., for the quarter ended September 30, 2003;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
and  procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the  filing  date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
         c)  presented  in this  quarterly  report  our  conclusions  about  the
effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

         a) all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
         b) any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
other  employees  who  have a  significant  role  in the  registrant's  internal
controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and I have  indicated  in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  November 14, 2003

/s/ Leon M. Caldwell
--------------------
Leon M. Caldwell
Treasurer