alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 918/2005

of 16 June 2005         

fixing the export refunds on cereals and on wheat or rye flour, groats and meal

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The export refunds on the products listed in Article 1(a), (b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003, excluding malt, exported in the natural state, shall be as set out in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 17 June 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 June 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

(2)OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1431/2003 (OJ L 203, 12.8.2003, p. 16).

----

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 16 June 2005 fixing the export refunds on cereals and on wheat or rye flour, groats and meal

----
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Judicial Seminars Disclosure - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"F4NDZQ4hFV\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/the-court\/judges\/judicial-seminars-disclosure\/\">Judicial Seminars Disclosure<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/the-court\/judges\/judicial-seminars-disclosure\/embed\/#?secret=F4NDZQ4hFV\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Judicial Seminars Disclosure” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"F4NDZQ4hFV\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Effective January 1, 2007, the Judicial Conference of the United States adopted a Policy on Judges’ Attendance at Privately Funded Educational Programs (external) that requires judges and educational program providers to disclose certain information about the attendance of judges at privately-funded educational programs.\u00a0 A link to the Federal Circuit’s disclosure report is below. Any organization […]"}
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Cityscape Financial Corp.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement No.
333-1348 on Form S-8, registration statement No. 333-11383 on Form S-3,
registration statement No. 333-28467 on Form S-3, registration statement No.
333-36573 on Form S-3, registration statement No. 333-36055 on Form S-8 and
registration statement No. 333-28465 on Form S-3 of Cityscape Financial Corp. of
our report dated March 31, 1998, which report makes reference to the report of
other auditors, relating to the consolidated statements of financial condition
of Cityscape Financial Corp. and Subsidiary as of December 31, 1997 and 1996,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity
(deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period then
ended, which report appears in the December 31, 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Cityscape Financial Corp.

Our report dated March 31, 1998, does not express an opinion on the 1997
consolidated financial statements of the Company as the Company has suffered a
significant net loss for the year ended December 31, 1997, and has a net capital
deficiency as of December 31, 1997. At December 31, 1997, these circumstances
raise substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going
concern. The 1997 consolidated financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.


                                            /s/KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

New York, New York
March 31, 1998
NUMBER 13-15-00065-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

JOHN ANDREW RANKIN, Appellant,

v.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF 

PUBLIC SAFETY, Appellee.

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 8

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

ORDER

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Longoria

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on appellant’s second unopposed motion for 

extension of time to file the brief. Appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on April 

9, 2015, and this Court previously granted appellant an extension of more than three 

months for the filing of appellant’s brief in this cause. Appellant has now filed his second
unopposed motion requesting until November 23, 2015, or an additional one hundred and 

thirty-one days to file the appellate brief in this cause.

The Court, having fully examined and considered appellant's second motion for 

extension of time to file the brief and the extension previously granted in this cause, is of 

the opinion that, in the interest of justice, appellant's second motion for extension of time 

to file the brief should be GRANTED with order. The Court, however, looks with disfavor 

upon the delay caused by counsel's failure to timely file a brief in this matter. 

Appellant's second motion for extension of time to file the brief is hereby granted, 

and the appellant’s counsel is ORDERED to file the appellate brief with this Court on or 

before November 23, 2015. No further extensions will be granted in this matter absent 

truly exigent circumstances supported by pleading and proof. In this regard, counsel’s 

workload does not constitute exigent circumstances. The failure to timely file the brief 

may result in the dismissal of this appeal.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 

24th day of August, 2015.
[No. 3113.]

#### Charles Bennett *v.*The State.

1. Practice in this Court.—Statement of facts, unless authenticated by the trial judge, will not be considered by this court for any purpose ■whatever.

8. Theft from the Person—Evidence.—Indictment for the theft of a watch and chain from the person of the owner alleged the aggregate value of the two articles, ' *Held,*not error to admit evidence of the value of the watch alone.

8. Same.—Theft from the person is, *per se,*a felony without reference to the value of the article stolen, if of any value whatever.

Appeal from the District Court of Denton. Tried below before the Hon. C, C. Potter.

The conviction was for tb,e theft of a watch and chain from the person of L. Torply. The punishment awarded was a term of three years in the penitentiary.

The matters embraced in the second and third head notes of this report were, with others, assigned as grounds for new trial,

*237No brief for the appellant has reached the Reporters.

*J. S. Burts,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Willson, Judge.

1. There is no statement of facts in the record such as we can consider. There is a paper in the record which purports to be a statement of facts, but the same is not authenticated by the trial judge, and cannot therefore be regarded. *(White*v. *The State,*9 Texas Ct. App., *41; Myers*v. *The State,*Id., 157.)

3. This being a prosecution for theft from the person, it was sufficient to allege in the indictment that the watch and chain alleged to have been stolen were, together, of the value of thirty-five dollars, without alleging the separate value of the articles; and such allegation being in the indictment, it was not error to admit evidence as to the value of the watch alone. In a prosecution for theft from the person, there is no grading of the offense by the value of the property stolen, as in the case of ordinary theft. The offense is a felony if the property stolen from the person is of any value whatever, (Penal Code, Art. *744; Flynn*v. *The State,*42 Texas, 321.)

In the absence of a statement of facts, other questions presented in the record cannot be considered. The judgment is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*

Opinion delivered May 17, 1884.
###### Editorial Note on Part 36

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 74 FR 23956, May 22, 2009, 77 FR 30411, May 23, 2012, 82 FR 25538, June 2, 2017, and corrected at 83 FR 4153, Jan. 30, 2018. Nomenclature changes to part 36 also appear at 83 FR 63587, Dec. 11, 2018, and 84 FR 4360, Feb. 15, 2019.

#### § 36.310 General.

(a) Plant specific operations expenses include the following accounts:

| Network Support Expenses | Account 6110. |
| --- | --- |
| General Support Expenses | Account 6120. |
| Central Office Switching Expenses | Account 6210. |
| Operator System Expenses | Account 6220. |
| Central Office Transmission Expenses | Account 6230. |
| Information Origination/Termination Expenses | Account 6310. |
| Cable and Wire Facilities Expenses | Account 6410. |

Table 1 to Paragraph (a)

(b) These accounts are used to record costs related to specific kinds of telecommunications plant and predominantly mirror the telecommunications plant in service detail accounts. Accordingly, these expense accounts will generally be apportioned in the same manner as the related plant accounts.

(c) Except where property obtained from or furnished to other companies is treated as owned property by the company making the separation, and the related operating rents are excluded from the separation studies as set forth in § 36.2 (c) and (d), amounts are apportioned among the operations on bases generally consistent with the treatment prescribed for similar plant costs and consistent with the relative magnitude of the items involved.

[52 FR 17229, May 6, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 33012, Aug. 29, 1988; 69 FR 12551, Mar. 17, 2004; 83 FR 63586, Dec. 11, 2018]
EXHIBIT 32(b)

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Hendrx Corp. (Registrant) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Cherry Cai, chief financial officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) |  | This Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Registrant.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Cherry Cai

Cherry Cai

Chief Financial Officer

May 11, 2006

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Martin, Michael (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Everyone: 

Martin, Michael (OST) 

Monday, March 11, 2013 6:19 PM 

Kenny Patterson Uoleary@showlowaz.gov); Jeffrey Tripp Ueffrey.tripp@prescott-az.gov); 

John Salem Usalem@cityofkingman.gov); Dave French (kaadave@frontier.com); 

mayor@mail.cityofpage.org 

jcook@amanresorts.com; mmatthews@flygreatlakes.com; chowell@flygreatlakes.com; 

Bob Karns (bob@sovereignairinc.com); Tim Sieber (tim@seaportair.com); 

eas@seaportair.com; Devany, Dennis (OST) 

Due date for community comments extended to Friday, March 29, 2013 

We received a request from the community of Prescott to extend the due date for community comments. We have 

agreed to grant a one-time extension and, therefore, comments from all four communities are now due Friday, March 

29, 2013. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. 

Regards, 

Michael Martin 

United States Department of Transportation 

Essential Air Service (EAS) and Small Community Air Service Development Program (SCASDP) 

(202) 366-6494 

1 

···:···! 

·~ . : ,... . -· 

~: .. , ...
§ 79.100 Incorporation by reference. ( a ) Certain material is incorporated by reference into this part with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. To enforce any edition other than that specified in this section, the FCC must publish a document in the Federal Register and the material must be available to the public. All approved incorporation by reference (IBR) material is available for inspection at the FCC and the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). Contact the FCC through the Federal Communications Commission's Reference Information Center, phone: (202) 418-0270. For information on the availability of this material at NARA, visit *www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html* or email *fr.inspection@nara.gov .* The material may be obtained from the sources in the following paragraphs of this section.
( b ) Global Engineering Documents, 15 Inverness Way East, Englewood, CO 80112, (800) 854-7179, or at *http://global.ihs.com:* ( 1 ) EIA-708-B: “Digital Television (DTV) Closed Captioning,” 1999, IBR approved for § 79.102.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( c ) Society of Motion Picture & Television Engineers (SMPTE), 3 Barker Ave., 5th Floor, White Plains, NY 10601, or at the SMPTE Web site: *http://www.smpte.org/standards/:* ( 1 ) SMPTE ST 2052-1:2010: “Timed Text Format (SMPTE-TT)” 2010, IBR approved for §§ 79.4 and 79.103.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
[77 FR 19518, Mar. 30, 2012, as amended at 85 FR 64409, Oct. 13, 2020; 88 FR 21449, Apr. 10, 2023]
(Translated
      from Chinese by the H.J.M. International Law Office)


    


    Hami
      City Land Resource Bureau Document (HCLRBD)

    


    HCLRBD
      File No. (2006) 421

       

      
        

      

    

    


    Land
      Approval Confirmation

    For

    Xinjiang
      Yajia Distillate Company Limited Application

    


    Xinjiang
      Yajia Distillate Company Limited:

    


    According
      to the stipulation of the Land Management Regulations of the People’s Republic
      of China, with regard to the District Planning Committee’s Approval
      Confirmation
      to the
      Project of
      Xinjiang Yajia Distillate Company Limited of Annual Procudtion of 20,000 Metric
      Tons of Corn Ethanol, with the File No. 2006-4 of Hami’s Land, Planning,
      Industrial, Transportation and Power Bureau,
      and the
      Notice of Approval
      of Xinjiang Yajia Distillate Company Limited Enter Industrial Zone, with the
      Anter File No. 2006-3 of Hami Industrial Zone Management,
      through
      a detail study from our Bureau, we approve the following:

    


    
      	 	
              1.

            	
              Agree
                to distribute your company the land usage rights of 100,192 m2 of
                the
                state-owned land in the Guangdong Industrial Zone. This land is for
                industrial use only. The allotted time of the land is 50 years. The
                termination date is November 27,
                2056.

            


    

    


    
      	 	
              2.

            	
              According
                to the doctrine of the Xinjiang People’s Government’s new policy, with
                file number 2005-65, The
                Suggestion of Fully Utilize the Undeveloped Land and to Speed Up
                the
                Industrial Development of the Local District,
                we decided to waive your company the Land Use Compensation Fee and
                the New
                Land Construction Compensation Fee.

            


    

    


    
      	 	
              3.

            	
              After
                your company receives this document, please come to our office to
                complete
                all the land transfer procedures. Without approval, it is not allowed
                to
                change the land usage terms and conditions, to lease or to mortgage
                it to
                other parties.

            


    

     

    Hami
      City
      Land Resource Bureau

    


    November
      28, 2006

    


    Subject:
      Land, Transfer, Approval

     

    Submit
      to: City Hall, District Land Resource Bureau, City Development Bureau, Land
      File
      Department and Law and Monitoring Team of our Bureau

     

    File
      two copies
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF M.P. AND F. P., 

MINOR CHILDREN, 

 

 Appellant. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-21-00018-CV

Appeal from the

65th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2019DCM5435)

CORRECTED ORDER

In order to protect the identity of the minor children who are the subject of this appeal, the 

Court has determined on its own motion that it is necessary to identify the children by their initials, 

M.P. and F.P, and the parent by initials as well, in all papers submitted to the Court, including 

letters, motions, and briefs. See Tex.R.App.P. 9..8. The Court will also refer to the children and 

parent by their initials in correspondence, orders, and in its opinion and judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of January, 2021.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox and Alley, JJ.

Alley, J., not participating
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the Annual  Report of Return On Investment  Corporation
(the  "Company")  on Form  10-KSB  for the  period  ended  June  30,  2003  (the
"Report"), I, Sherwin Krug, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,  certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                   By: /s/ Sherwin Krug
                                       --------------------
                                   Sherwin Krug
                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                   (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
                                   September 26, 2003
§ 80.915 Main power supply. ( a ) There must be readily available for use under normal load conditions a main power supply sufficient to simultaneously energize the radiotelephone transmitter at its required antenna power, and the required receiver. Under this load condition the potential of the main power supply at the power input terminals of the radiotelephone installation must not deviate from its rated potential by more than 10 percent on vessels completed on or after March 1, 1957, nor by more than 15 percent on vessels completed before that date.
( b ) When the main power supply consists of batteries, they must be installed as high above the bilge as practicable, secured against shifting with motion of the vessel, and accessible with not less than 26 cm (10 in.) head room.
( c ) Means must be provided for adequately charging any batteries used as a main power supply. There must be a device which gives a continuous indication of the rate and polarity of the charging current during charging.
[51 FR 31213, Sept. 2, 1986, as amended at 58 FR 44953, Aug. 25, 1993]
Exhibit 15.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement (Form F-3 No. 333-111040) of Teléfonos de México, S.A.B. de C.V. and in the related prospectus of our report dated July 13, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Teléfonos de
México, S.A.B. de C.V., Teléfonos de México, S.A.B. de C.V. s managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting of Teléfonos de México, S.A.B. de C.V., included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2006.



Mancera, S.C.A member firm ofErnst & Young Global/s/ Fernando Espinosa LópezC.P.C. Fernando Espinosa López


Mexico City, Mexico

July 13, 2007