alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 164 (Thursday, August 24, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 50084]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7106]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

    Notice is hereby given that on August 8, 2006, a proposed Consent 
Decree in United States v. University of Miami, Civil Action Number 06-
22000-CIV-JORDAN, was lodged with the United States District Court for 
the Southern District of Florida.
    In this action the United States sought, under Section 107 of the 
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 
42 U.S.C. 9607, recovery of response costs incurred by the Army Corps 
of Engineers in response to releases of hazardous substances at a site 
located on land that was formerly the Richmond Naval Air Station, in 
Perrine, Florida. Under the Consent Decree, the Defendant will pay 
$393,473 for past response costs associated with the site, and the 
United States gives a covenant not to sue for past response costs 
associated with the site.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, P.O. Box 
7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611, and should 
refer to United States v. University of Miami, DOJ Ref. 90-11-
3-08486.
    The Consent Decree may be examined at the Office of the United 
States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, 99 NE 4th Street, 
Miami, Florida. During the public comment period, the proposed Consent 
Decree may be examined on the following Department of Justice Web site: 
http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the proposed 
Consent Decree may also be obtained by mail from the Consent Decree 
Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 
20044-7611, or by faxing or E-mailing a request to Tonia Fleetwood, 
[email protected], Fax No. (202) 514-0097, phone confirmation 
number (202) 514-1547. In requesting a copy from the Consent Decree 
Library, please enclose a check in the amount of $4.25 (25 cents per 
page reproduction cost) payable to the U.S. Treasury, or, if by E-mail 
or fax, forward a check in that amount to the Consent Decree Library at 
the stated address.

Henry Friedman,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment 
and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 06-7106 Filed 8-23-06; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
```
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advanc e sheets, it may be cited as State v. Lamb , Slip Opinion No. 2021-Ohio-4120 .]

NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to f ormal revision before it is pu blished in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are reques ted to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohi o, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published.

S LIP O PINION N O
. 2021-O HIO -4120
T HE S TATE OF O HIO , A PPELLEE , v. L AMB , A PPELLANT
. [Until this opinion appears in t he Ohio Official Reports advanc e sheets, it may be cited as State v. Lamb , Slip Opinion No. 2021-Ohio-4120.] Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently accepted

. (No. 2021-0271―Submitted November 10, 2021 ―Decided November 24, 2021.)
A PPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lucas County, No. L-19-1177,
2021-Ohio-87.

_________________ {¶ 1} This cause is dismissed as havi ng been improvidently accepted.
O’C ONNOR , C.J., and K ENNEDY , F ISCHER , D E W INE , D ONNELLY , S TEWART , and B RUNNER , JJ., concur.

_________________ Julia R. Bates, Lucas County Pros ecuting Attorney, and Evy M. J arrett, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defende r, and Timothy B. Hackett, As sistant Public Defender, for a ppellant, Marwan Lamb.S UPREME C OURT OF O HIO

2 _________________
227P08-4

#### State v. Sabas Ibarra

Defs *Pro Se*Motion for PDR (COAP15-569)

Denied
#### § 63.100 Notification of service outage.

The requirements for communications providers concerning communications disruptions and the filing of outage reports are set forth in part 4 of this chapter.

[69 FR 70342, Dec. 3, 2004]
|    |                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of ArthroCare Corporation; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                      |
|----------------------|
|                      |  |  |  |
| Date: April 30, 2014 | By: |   | /s/ TODD NEWTON |
|                 |   |   | Todd NewtonExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer |
No. 11-9288.

#### Jackson *v.*Brown, Warden.

Super. Ct. Montgomery County, Ga. Certiorari denied.
Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announces the following advisory committee meeting. 

*Name:*                         National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics (NCVHS), Ad Hoc  Workgroup on the Nationwide Health Information Network (NHIN).                    

*Time and Date:*                         August 31, 2006—11 a.m.-3 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time.                    

*Place:*                         Conference Call; Toll Free—1-888-425-9978; Leader's Name and Pass code—Dr. Simon Cohn, NCVHS; USA Toll Number 1-210-234-8000.                    

*Status:*                         Open.                     

*Purpose:*                         The Workgroup will discuss its draft findings related to a “minimum but essential” list of functional requirements for a nationwide health information network.                    

*Contact Person for More Information:*                         Substantive program information as well as summaries of meetings and a roster of committee members may be obtained from Mary Jo Deering PhD., Lead Staff Person for the NCVHS Workgroup on the National Health Information Infrastructure, NCI Center for Strategic Dissemination and NCI Center for Bioinformatics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard—Room 4087, Rockville, MD 20852, telephone (301) 594-8193, or Marjorie S. Greenberg, Executive Secretary, NCVHS, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 3311 Toledo Road, Room 2402, Hyattsville,                         Start Printed Page 47813                        Maryland 20782, telephone (301) 458-4245. Information also is available on the NCVHS home page of the HHS Web site:                         *http://www.ncvhs.hhs.gov/​,*                         where an agenda for the meeting will be posted when available.                    

Should you require reasonable accommodation, please contact the CDC Office of Equal Employment Opportunity on (301) 458-4EEO (4336) as soon as possible.

Dated: August 10, 2006.

James Scanlon,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Science and Data Policy, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation.

[FR Doc. 06-7023 Filed 8-17-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4151-04-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                           
                                          
<ARTICLE> 5 
<LEGEND>

                                                                  Exhibit 27

                     TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY, L.P.
                             FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE


     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P. for the three
months ended March 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                0000893657
<NAME>                               TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT
<MULTIPLIER>                         1,000,000
       
<S>                                  <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                       JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                         MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                  321
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                         2,900
<ALLOWANCES>                            477
<INVENTORY>                           3,544
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      4,123
<PP&E>                               10,033
<DEPRECIATION>                        3,848
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       22,532
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 4,818
<BONDS>                               6,921
<COMMON>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   615
<PREFERRED>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                            5,115
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         22,532
<SALES>                               2,934
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      2,934
<CGS>                                 1,704
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         1,704
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      137
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         340
<INCOME-TAX>                             28
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     312
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                            312
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0


        

</TABLE>
#### § 61.31 Scope.

The rules in this subpart apply to all dominant carriers.

[64 FR 46588, Aug. 26, 1999]
706 P.2d 70

#### Frederick H. BLECHMANN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BLAINE COUNTY, a legal subdivision of the State of Idaho, Defendant-Respondent.

No. 15494.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

Aug. 28, 1985.

Robert H. Copple, Terry C. Copple, Boise, for plaintiff-appellant.

Ray Keith Roark, Hailey, for defendant-respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the decision of the district court, which affirmed the issuance of a two-year conditional use permit. The permit was granted by the Blaine County Planning and Zoning Commission on May 12, 1983, and affirmed, as modified, by the Blaine County Board of Commissioners on July 12, 1983. The Planning and Zoning Commission had granted a five-year permit, which the county commissioners reduced to two years in duration.

Frederick Blechmann, the appellant, alleges several procedural errors below. The best he could expect from this Court, though, would be a decision remanding the case for correction of the alleged errors. This would be useless, however, because, the permit in issue expired May 12, 1985, rendering the procedural issues raised moot — the challenged permit no longer is in force. At oral argument, we were informed that an eight-year permit — one identical to the now expired two-year permit — has been granted by the Blaine County Planning and Zoning Commission. We understand that that decision is being appealed to the Board of County Commissioners, and may in time be re-examined by the district court, and then this Court. With the experience gained on this appeal, it is believed then in this second proceeding a record will be made and preserved which surpasses that before us here. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed as moot.

Costs to respondents; no attorney’s fees.

BAKES, J., would affirm the judgment of the district court.
- RI 78 1
- RI 78 2
- RI 78 3
#### § 17.24 Existing structures.

No change to painting or lighting criteria or relocation of airports shall at any time impose a new restriction upon any then existing or authorized antenna structure or structures, unless the FAA issues a new determination of “no hazard” and associated FAA study for the particular structure.

[79 FR 56986, Sept. 24, 2014]
*Title:*                     Objective Work Plan (OWP), Objective Progress Report (OPR) and Project Abstract.                

*OMB No.*                     0980-0204.                

*Description:*                     The information collected by OWP is needed to properly administer and monitor the Administration for Native Americans (ANA) programs within the Administration for Children and Families (ACF). OWP assists applicants in describing their project's objectives                     Start Printed Page 47815                    and activities, and also assists independent panel reviewers, ANA staff and the ANA Commissioner during the review and funding decision process. The information in OPR is being collected on a quarterly basis to monitor the performance of grantees and better gauge grantee progress. The standardized format will allow ANA to report results across all its program areas and flag grantees that may need additional training and/or technical assistance to successfully implement their projects.                

The Project Abstract provides crucial information in a concise format that is utilized by applicants, independent reviewers, ANA staff and the ANA Commissioner.

*Respondents:*                     Tribal Govt., Native non-profits, Tribal Colleges & Universities.                

## Annual Burden Estimates

*Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:*                     2,850.                

*Additional Information:*                     Copies of the proposed collection may be obtained by writing to the Administration for Children and Families, Office of Administration, Office of Information Services, 370 L'Enfant Promenade, SW., Washington, DC 20447, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer. All requests should be identified by the title of the information collection. E-mail address:                     *infocollection@acf.hhs.gov.*

*OMB Comment:*                     OMB is required to make a decision concerning the collection of information between 30 and 60 days after publication of this document in the                     **Federal Register.**                     Therefore, a comment is best assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of publication. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent directly to the following: Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC  20503, attn: Desk Officer for ACF, e-mail address:                     *Katherine_T._Astrich@omb.eop.gov.*

Dated: August 14, 2006.

Robert Sargis,

Reports Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. 06-7015 Filed 8-17-06; 8:45 am]  

BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2879

In Re: REGINALD L. FRAZIER,

Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District

Judge. (MISC-490-3-5-F)

Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 28, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald L. Frazier, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Reginald Frazier appeals the district court's denial of his

application for reinstatement to practice law in the Eastern District of North Carolina. In addition, he petitions this court for

a writ of mandamus or prohibition directing the district court to

grant his application.

Frazier was disbarred in North Carolina in 1989, and his

petition for reinstatement was denied in 1995. Since Frazier is not

a licensed attorney, we find no error in the district court's

ruling and deny the petition for writ of mandamus or prohibition.

Frazier's application to proceed in forma pauperis is denied and

this matter is dismissed. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
FIL ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T J ULY 9, 2012 J OHN LEY CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 1- 15 94 6 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 9 :0 2- cr-8 00 51 -DTKH-4 UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee, ve rs us HAROLD JOHNSON, ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll Defen da nt -Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt forth e So ut he rnDis tri ctof F lo rid a
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ (Jul y 9, 2 01 2) Befo re EDMONDSON, W ILSON an d B LACK, Circ ui t J ud ge s. PER CURI AM:Haro ldJo hn so n app eal s the di stric t co urt’s d en ia l o f hi s m ot io n t o m od ify

hi s s en te nc e, pu rs uantto 18 U.S.C. § 3 58 2( c)(2 ). Jo hn so n was co nv ic te d o f co ns pi racy to p os se ss with the in te ntto di st rib ut e 5 0 g ram s o r m or e o f cra ck co cai ne . Becau se Jo hn so n h adtwo pri orfel on y co nv ic ti on s fo r th e sa le of a co nt ro ll edsubs tanc e, he was s en te nc edun de r th e car eer o ffen de r gu id el in es of U.S.S.G. § 4 B1 .1. Nev erthe le ss , Jo hn so n fi le d h is m ot io n p ur su an t t o Am en dm en t 75 0 t o the Sen te nc in g Gu id el in es , whi chlo weredth e b as e o ffen se lev el s ap pl ic ab le to crac k c oc ai ne qu an ti ty lev el s. Jo hn so n c on ced es th athi s ar gu m en t i s fo recl os edby ourde ci si on in Uni te d Stat es v. Moo re , 54 1 F .3d13 23 (11 th Cir . 20 08 ). In Moo re , we hel d tha t de fen da nt s wh o wer e o rig in al ly sen te nc edun de r § 4 B1 .1(b )’s care er o ffen de r tabl e were n oteli gi bl e fo r § 3 58 2( c)(2 ) rel ie f be cau se th ei r gu id el in e ran ge s wer e n ot ba se d o n the dru g qua nt ity off en se lev el s wh ic h Am en dm en t 7 06 ha d l owe red . Se e Mo or e , 54 1 F .3dat 1 32 7- 30 (co nc lu di ng “ [w]here aretro act iv el y ap pl ic ab le gu id el in e am en dm en t re du ces a de fen da nt ’s bas e o ffen se lev el , bu t d oe s n otalt er th e se nt en ci ng ran ge up onwhi chhi s o r he r se nt en ce was ba se d, § 35 82 (c)( 2) do es no t au th or iz e a reduc ti on insen te nc e”). The di stric t co urt d idno t err whe n i t d en ie d J oh ns on ’s m ot io n t o m od ify his se nt en ce p ur su an t t o 1 8 U.S.C. § 35 82 (c)( 2) . The co urt l ack edth e au th or ity to 2m od ify Jo hn so n’s s en te nc e b ecau se Jo hn so n was sen te nc edas acare er o ffen de r,

pu rs ua ntto U.S.S.G. § 4 B1 .1, an d Am en dm en t 7 50 di d n otha ve th e eff ectof lo weri ng Jo hn so n’s g ui de li ne ran ge . AFFIRMED.

3
Opinion filed June 14, 2018

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

___________

No. 11-16-00030-CV

___________

RICKY LANCE MILLER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE 

FOR THE NANNIE LOU MILLER FAMILY TRUST, ET AL.,

Appellants

V.

PATRICIA MILLER LAUGHLIN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

TRUSTEE FOR THE NANNIE LOU MILLER FAMILY TRUST,

AND TONYA MILLER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

INDEPENDENT EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF GARY 

BRUCE MILLER, DECEASED, Appellees

On Appeal from the 39th District Court

Haskell County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 11,977-A

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellants have filed in this court a motion to dismiss this appeal. According 

to the motion, “the parties have resolved their differences and have reached a full 

and final settlement of all claims and controversies.” Appellants request that this 
2

appeal be dismissed with prejudice per the settlement agreement—a copy of which 

was attached to the motion to dismiss. In accordance with Appellants’ request, we 

dismiss this appeal with prejudice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a).

The motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

June 14, 2018

Panel consists of: Willson, J., 

Bailey, J., and Wright, S.C.J.1

 

1

Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, 

sitting by assignment.
Please print or type. (Form designed for use on elite (12-pitch) typewriter.) 	 	 	 	 	 	 Form Approved. OMB No. 2050-0039

GENER

ATO

R TRANSPO

RTER DESIGNATED FACILITY

UNIFORM HAZARDOUS WASTE MANIFEST

(Continuation Sheet)

21. Generator ID Number 22. Page 23. Manifest Tracking Number

24. Generator's Name

25. Transporter Company Name U.S. EPA ID Number

27a.

HM

27b. U.S. DOT Description (including Proper Shipping Name, Hazard Class, ID Number,

and Packing Group (if any))

28. Containers

No. Type

29. Total

Quantity

30. Unit

Wt./Vol. 31. Waste Codes

32. Special Handling Instructions and Additional Information

33. Transporter _______ Acknowledgment of Receipt of Materials

Printed/Typed Name Signature Month Day Year

35. Discrepancy

36. Hazardous Waste Report Management Method Codes (i.e., codes for hazardous waste treatment, disposal, and recycling systems)

Printed/Typed Name Signature Month Day Year

34. Transporter _______ Acknowledgment of Receipt of Materials

EPA Form 8700-22A (Rev. 3-05) Previous editions are obsolete.

U.S. EPA ID Number

_______

26. Transporter _______ Company Name

DESIGNATED FACILITY TO DESTINATION STATE (IF REQUIRED)