alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Report of Houston Operating Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Low
Chin Sin, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Low Chin Sin
-----------------
Low Chin Sin
President and CFO
November 4, 2004
#### §§ 95.2169-95.2171 [Reserved]
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES 

Public Health Service 

Agency for Toxic Substances 

and Disease Registry 

Memorandum 

Date: August 2, 2011 

From: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry 

Subject: Comments on EPA’s Toxicological Review of Vanadium Pentoxide 

To: Environmental Protection Agency 

We appreciate the opportunity to review EPA’s Toxicological Review of 

Vanadium Pentoxide. Overall, we found the draft IRIS Toxicological Review and 

fact sheet well-written and concise. Studies of support within the document are 

sufficiently synthesized in a scientific manner to present the overall assessment of 

this substance as it relates to environmental health. The authors did a good job of 

stacking the evidence for the specific exposure and leading the reader to 

appropriate conclusions about vanadium pentoxide. 

One minor editorial comment: On Page 14, last sentence under Oral Exposure: 

there should be a comma after hair“...but not hair, is a sensitive...” 

1
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4705

To authorize the appropriation of funds for the Federal share of the cost

of the construction of a Forest Ecosystem Research Laboratory at Oregon State University in Corvallis, Oregon, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 30, 1994

Mr. KOPETSKI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To authorize the appropriation of funds for the Federal

share of the cost of the construction of a Forest Ecosystem Research Laboratory at Oregon State University

in Corvallis, Oregon, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Forest Ecosystem Re5 search Laboratory Authorization Act of 1994’’.

6 SEC. 2. FOREST ECOSYSTEM RESEARCH LABORATORY.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to the availability of

8 funds appropriated under subsection (c), the Secretary of
2

•HR 4705 IH

1 Agriculture, acting through the Cooperative State Re2 search Service, shall provide the Federal share of the cost

3 of planning and constructing a Forest Ecosystem Re4 search Laboratory at Oregon State University in Corvallis,

5 Oregon.

6 (b) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share provided

7 under subsection (a) shall be 50 percent.

8 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There

9 are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section

10 $10,000,000, to remain available until expended.

Æ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

AMENDMENT OF RULE 219 OF THE

PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF

DISCIPLINARY ENFORCEMENT :

:

:

:

: NO. 163

DISCIPLINARY RULES

DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 29 th day of June , 201 8 , upon the recommendation of the

Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania ; the proposal having been

published for comment in the Pennsylvania Bulletin, 48 Pa.B. 1270 ( March 3 , 201 8 ) :

It is Ordered pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania

that Rule 219 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement is amended in the

attached form.

This Order shall be processed in ac cordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and shall

be effective in 30 days

.

Material to be added i s bold ed and underlined.

Material to be deleted is bold ed and in brackets.
Editorial Note on Part 36
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 74 FR 23956, May 22, 2009, 77 FR 30411, May 23, 2012, 82 FR 25538, June 2, 2017, and corrected at 83 FR 4153, Jan. 30, 2018. Nomenclature changes to part 36 also appear at 83 FR 63587, Dec. 11, 2018, and 84 FR 4360, Feb. 15, 2019.

§ 36.302 General. ( a ) This section sets forth procedures for the apportionment among the operations of operating expenses and operating taxes.
( b ) As covered in § 36.2 (c) and (d), the treatment of expenses relating to plant furnished to and obtained from others under rental arrangements is consistent with the treatment of such plant.
( c ) In accordance with requirements in part 32 § 32.5999 (f) expenses recorded in the expense accounts are segregated in the accounting process among the following subsidiary record categories as appropriate to each account: Salaries and Wages Benefits Rents Other Expenses Clearances
( 1 ) Subsidiary Record Categories (SRCs) for Salaries and Wages, Benefits and Other Expenses are applicable to all of the expense accounts except for: ( i ) SRCs for access expenses are maintained to identify interstate and state access expense and billing and collection expense for carrier's carrier.
( ii ) Depreciation and Amortization Expense SRCs identify the character of the items contained in the account.
( 2 ) SRCs for Rents and Clearance are only applicable to the Plant Specific Operating Expense accounts 6110 thru 6410.
[52 FR 17229, May 6, 1987, as amended at 83 FR 63586, Dec. 11, 2018]
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BENJAMIN IBARRA LIRA, AKA

Benjamin I. Lira, AKA Benjamin Ibarra,

AKA Benjamin Ibarra Lira,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney

General,

Respondent. No. 15

- 72416

Agency No. A074

- 215

- 404

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 17, 2021 * *

Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Benjamin Ibarra Lira, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of

the Board of Immigratio n Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision pretermitting his application for cancellation of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 20 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 15

- 72416

removal

. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo

questions of law and claims of due pr ocess violations in immigration proceedings.

Jiang v. Holder , 754 F.3d 733, 738 (9th Cir. 2014). We deny in part and dismiss in

part the petition for review.

The agency did not err in determining that Ibarra Lira failed to establish that

his conviction under California Health & Safety Code (“CHSC”) § 11350(a) is not

a controlled substance violation that renders him ineligible for cancellation of

removal. See 8 U.S.C. § § 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(II), 1229b(b)(1)(C); Lazo v. Wilkinson

,

989 F.3d 705, 714 (9th Cir. 2021) ( holding that C HSC § 11350 is divisible as to

controlled substance and relying on the charging document and guilty

- plea

colloquy to conclude th e conviction was for possession of cocaine and thus a

violation of a law “relating to a controlled substance”). Thus, Ibarra Lira’s

cancellation of removal claim fails.

As to Ibarra Lira’s contention that the IJ erred or violated due process by not

grant ing a continuance , the BIA did not err in concluding the argument is without

merit

. See Lata v. INS , 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring error to

prevail on a due process claim). To the extent Ibarra Lira rais es , in his opening

brief, a separate argument that the IJ did not allow him an opportunity to present

evidence, we lack jurisdiction to consider his contention. See Agyeman v. INS , 296

F.3d 871, 877 (9th Cir. 2002) ( due process claims based on correctable procedural3 15

- 72416

errors may no t be entertained unless they were raised below).

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the

mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part

.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4845 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4845

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
             coastwise trade for the vessel BROKEN PROMISE.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 1994

Mr. Young of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred 
           to the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
             coastwise trade for the vessel BROKEN PROMISE.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the 
Act of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106 of title 
46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue a 
certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for 
employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel BROKEN PROMISE (United 
States official number 904435).
                                 <all>
```
No. 11-49.

#### Wetzel, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al. *v.*Abu-Jamal.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**











In
      connection with the Annual Report of Celadon Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation
      (the "Company"), on Form 10-K/A for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Stephen Russell, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.











Date:
      October
      27, 2005 /s/
      Stephen
      Russell


Stephen
      Russell


Chairman
      of the Board and


Chief
      Executive Officer




Back
      to Form
      10-K/A
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Managed Pension Assets Partnership 1990-B, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of
operations  contained in its Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31, 1998 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         258,558
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  36,613
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               301,453
<PP&E>                                         3,961,093
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,429,167)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 833,379
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,620
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     826,759
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   833,379
<SALES>                                        212,187
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               225,829
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  96,349<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                70,119
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            70,119
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   70,119
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 10.63**

**AMENDMENT NO. 1**

**ADDITIONAL BENEFITS PLAN OF**

**DEL MONTE CORPORATION**

The AdditionalBenefits Plan of Del Monte Corporation , as amended and restated effective as of December 20, 2002 and as amended through January 1, 2005 (the “Plan”) is hereby amended pursuant to Section 6.1 of the Plan effective as of**January 1, 2005**. 

This Amendment is intended to be a good faith, interim amendment for the purposes of good faith compliance with InternalRevenue Code Section 409A (“Section 409A”) and the guidance issued thereunder, including the transition period provisions. The Plan and this Amendment may be amended in whole or in part by the end of the applicable transition periodunder Section 409A and applicable to all or any part of the period from January 1, 2005 until the end of the transition period. Notwithstanding this Amendment, the Plan may be administered during the transition period for Section 409Ain good faith compliance with any provisions of Section 409A or the guidance thereunder or any reasonable good faith interpretation thereof. 

**1.**

**Section 5.4(d)** is amended by adding at the end the following: 

For each calendar year, any election to defer an Additional Benefit shall be treated as and accounted for as a separately elected amount for which thetime and form of payment may be established separately from each other year’s election. 

**2.**

**Section 4.3** is amended by deleting all subsections other than (a)(1). 

**3.**

**Section 4.4** is amended by deleting subsections (b) and(c). 

**4.**

**Sections3, 4 and 5** are each amended by adding a new subsection at the end, **Sections 3.5, 4.5 and 5.7**, each to read as follows: 

    .    Delay for Key Employees. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Plan, if a Participant is a “specified employee”, as determined under Internal RevenueCode Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(i) with respect to the Corporation and its affiliates, and payment is made on account of the Participant’s termination of employment, the payment date shall be delayed to a date that is six months after the dateof such termination of employment. Any payments that would have been 

made during the six-month delay shall be accumulated and paid on the first business day of the seventh month after the date of such event. As permitted underCode Section 409A, this delay shall not apply to any payment under a domestic relations order or for payment of taxes or such other event as may be provided in regulation and guidance issued by the Internal Revenue Service. 

**5.**

Except as specifically amendedherein, the terms of the Plan shall continue in full force and effect. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this AmendmentNo. 1 to be adopted by the Compensation and Benefits Committee of the Board of Directors of Del Monte Corporation and executed by its duly designated officer. 

 

DEL MONTE CORPORATION

By:
 
/s/ Mark J. Buxton
 
Mark J. Buxton
 
Vice President, Human Resources

Date of Signing: December 14, 2006 

 

2
| 32.2  | Certification      of the Chief Financial Officer of Genesis Capital Corporation of Nevada      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of  2002 |
|------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                     |   |                             |   |
|--------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|--------|
| Dated:      May 15, 2009 |   | /s/ CHRISTOPHER      ASTROM |   |
|                     |   | Christopher      Astrom          |   |
|                     |   | Chief      Financial Officer     |   |
|                     |   |                             |   |
§ 61.17 Applications for special permission. ( a ) All issuing carriers that file applications for special permission, associated documents, such as transmittal letters, requests for special permission, and supporting information, shall file those documents electronically.
( b ) Applications for special permission must contain: ( 1 ) A detailed description of the tariff publication proposed to be put into effect;
( 2 ) A statement citing the specific rules and the grounds on which waiver is sought;
( 3 ) A showing of good cause; and
( 4 ) The appropriate Illustrative tariff pages the issuing carrier wishes to either revise or add as new pages to its tariff.
( c ) An application for special permission must be addressed to “Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554.” The Electronic Tariff Filing System will accept filings 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The official filing date of a publication received by the Electronic Tariff Filing System will be determined by the date and time the transmission ends. If the transmission ends after the close of a business day, as that term is defined in § 1.4(e)(2) of this chapter, the filing will be date and time stamped as of the opening of the next business day.
( d ) In addition, for special permission applications requiring fees as set forth in part 1, subpart G of this chapter, carriers shall submit the appropriate fee and associated payment form electronically through the process set forth in § 1.1105 of this chapter and, if practicable, the application and associated documents electronically in accordance with the procedures set forth on the Commission's website, *www.fcc.gov/licensing-databases/fees .* Applications which must be filed in hard copy format should be submitted according to the procedures set forth on the web page of the FCC's Office of the Secretary, *https://www.fcc.gov/secretary .*
( e ) In addition, if an issuing carrier applies for special permission to revise joint tariffs, the application must state that it is filed on behalf of all carriers participating in the affected service. Applications must be numbered consecutively in a series separate from FCC tariff numbers and Letters of Transmittal, bear the signature of the officer or agent of the carrier, and be in the following format: Application No. (Date) *Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554.* *Attention:* Wireline Competition Bureau (here provide the statements required by section 61.17(b)). (Exact name of carrier) (Name of officer or agent) (Title of officer or agent)
( f ) If approved, the issuing carrier must comply with all terms and use all authority specified in the grant. If a carrier elects to use less than the authority granted, it must apply to the Commission for modification of the original grant. If a carrier elects not to use the authority granted within sixty days of its effective date, the original grant will be automatically cancelled by the Commission.
[76 FR 43211, July 20, 2011, as amended at 83 FR 2557, Jan. 18, 2018]
No. 11-147.

#### Nordgulen *v.*American Family Mutual Insurance et al.

Ct. App. Wis. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 151 (Monday, August 7, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44637-44640]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6728]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 06-43]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/ADM, (703) 604-
6575.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 06-43 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

    Dated: August 1, 2006.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 44638]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07AU06.020


[[Page 44639]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07AU06.021


[[Page 44640]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07AU06.022

[FR Doc. 06-6728 Filed 8-4-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C