alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1456 CAF 11-02334**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, FAHEY, CARNI, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF ERICA WILLIAMS, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SHAWN EPPS, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

ALAN BIRNHOLZ, EAST AMHERST, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
ELIZABETH CIAMBRONE, BUFFALO, FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
PATRICIA M. MCGRATH, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, LOCKPORT, FOR RYLIE E.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Sharon M. LoVallo, J.), entered October 21, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order dismissed the violation petition. It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same Memorandum as in Matter of Williams v Epps ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Dec. 21, 2012]).

Entered: December 21, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
§ 80.335 Procedures for canceling false distress alerts. If a distress alert is inadvertently transmitted, the following steps shall be taken to cancel the distress alert. ( a ) VHF Digital Selective Calling. ( 1 ) Reset the equipment immediately;
( 2 ) Immediately cancel the distress alert orally over the telephony distress traffic channel associated with each DSC channel on which the distress alert was transmitted;
( 3 ) Set to Channel 16; and
( 4 ) Transmit a broadcast message to “All stations” giving the ship's name, call sign or registration number, and MMSI, and cancel the false distress alert.
( b ) MF Digital Selective Calling. ( 1 ) Reset the equipment immediately;
( 2 ) Immediately cancel the distress alert orally over the telephony distress traffic channel associated with each DSC channel on which the distress alert was transmitted; and
( 3 ) Tune for radiotelephony transmission on 2182 kHz; and
( 4 ) Transmit a broadcast message to “All stations” giving the ship's name, call sign or registration number, and MMSI, and cancel the false distress alert.
( c ) HF Digital Selective Calling; ( 1 ) Reset the equipment immediately;
( 2 ) Immediately cancel the distress alert orally over the telephony distress traffic channel associated with each DSC channel on which the distress alert was transmitted;
( 3 ) Tune for radiotelephony on the distress and safety frequency in each band in which a false distress alert was transmitted; and
( 4 ) Transmit a broadcast message to “All stations” giving the ship's name, call sign or registration number, and MMSI, and cancel the false distress alert frequency in each band in which a false distress alert was transmitted.
( d ) INMARSAT ship earth station. Immediately notify the appropriate rescue coordination center that the alert is cancelled by sending a distress priority message by way of the same land earth station through which the false distress alert was sent. Provide ship name, call sign or registration number, and INMARSAT identity with the cancelled alert message.
( e ) EPIRB. If for any reason an EPIRB is activated inadvertently, immediately contact the nearest U.S. Coast Guard unit or appropriate rescue coordination center by telephone, radio or ship earth station and cancel the distress alert.
( f ) General and other distress alerting systems. Notwithstanding paragraphs (a) through (e) of this section, ships may use additional appropriate means available to them to inform the nearest appropriate U.S. Coast Guard rescue coordination center that a false distress alert has been transmitted and should be cancelled.
[68 FR 46968, Aug. 7, 2003, as amended at 73 FR 4485, Jan. 25, 2008]
§ 90.525 Administration of interoperability channels. ( a ) States are responsible for administration of the Interoperability channels in the 769-775 MHz and 799-805 MHz frequency bands. Base and control stations must be licensed individually. A public safety entity meeting the requirements of § 90.523 may operate mobile or portable units on the Interoperability channels in the 769-775 MHz and 799-805 MHz frequency bands without a specific authorization from the Commission provided it holds a part 90 license. All persons operating mobile or portable units under this authority are responsible for compliance with part 90 of these rules and other applicable federal laws.
( b ) License applications for Interoperability channels in the 769-775 MHz and 799-805 MHz frequency bands must be approved by a state-level agency or organization responsible for administering state emergency communications. States may hold the licenses for Interoperability channels or approve other qualified entities to hold such licenses. States may delegate the approval process for interoperability channels to another entity, such as regional planning committees.
[72 FR 48860, Aug. 24, 2007]
Specimen Stock Certificate


     

    Number
      Shares

     BOASHINN
      CORPORATION     

    INCORPORATED
      UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

    


    COMMON
      VOTING STOCK                               Cusip                             COMMON
      VOTING
      STOCK 

    PAR
      VALUE: $0.001                                                                         FULLY
      PAID AND
      NON-ASSESSABLE

     

    THIS
      CERTIFIES THAT  SPECIMEN
      CERTIFICATE

     

    


    IS
      THE REGISTERED HOLDER OF 

    SHARES
      OF THE COMMON STOCK OF BOASHINN CORPORATION,
      a Nevada
      Corporation, transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder
      hereof in person or by Attorney upon surrender of the Certificate properly
      endorsed. Witness
      the
      facsimile Seal of the Corporation and the facsimile Signatures of its duly
      authorized officers. 

    


     Not
      Valid
      Unless

    Initialed
      by Transfer Agent

    By:
       Authorized
      Initial 

    


    


    MADISON
      STOCK TRANSFER INC.

    PO
      BOX
      145

    BROOKLYN,
      NY 11229

     

    Ricky
      Chiu               Boashinn
      Corporation                Ricky
      Chiu

    President
      & CEO                             Corporate
      Seal                                 Secretary

    NEVADA
Order entered June 28, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00309-CV

DOROTHY ROBERSON, Appellant

V.

VILLAS TENISON PARK, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-18-01000-D

ORDER

On May 29, 2018, after being informed by court reporter Coral L. Wahlen that no party 

had requested the reporter’s record be prepared, we directed appellant to file written verification 

she had requested the record. We cautioned appellant that failure to comply within ten days 

could result in the appeal being submitted without the reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P.

37.3(c). To date, appellant has not complied. Accordingly, we ORDER the appeal submitted 

without the reporter’s record. See id.

As the clerk’s record has been filed, we ORDER appellant’s brief be filed no later than 

July 30, 2018.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4450 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4450

To amend title 18, United States Code, to federalize the crime of child 
                              molestation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 18, 1994

 Mr. Reynolds introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to federalize the crime of child 
                              molestation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Lock Out Child Crime Act of 1994''.

SEC. 2. CHILD MOLESTATION.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 110 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 2259. Child molestation
    ``(a) Whoever knowingly engages in child molestation where the 
child molested is 5 years or more younger than the person so engaging, 
shall be fined under this title and imprisoned not less than 10 years 
and may be imprisoned for any greater term of years or for life.
    ``(b) As used in this section, the term `child molestation' means a 
sexual act or sexual contact, as those terms are defined for the 
purposes of chapter 109A of this title, with an individual who has not 
attained the age of 18 years.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 110 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at 
the end the following new item:

``2259. Child molestation.''.

                                 <all>
```
No. 11-5547.

#### Oden *v.*Knowles, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# CDR Andrew Gadbois

### Instructor, Sea Service Chair

### Information Warfare, Intelligence, Maritime Operations

### 

**Areas of Interest:**

Planning, joint operations, globally integrated operations, information warfare, intelligence, maritime operations

Commander Andrew (Andy) Gadbois is a Naval Intelligence Officer and the Sea Services Chair at the College of Information and Cyberspace, National Defense University, Fort McNair Washington D.C.  He holds a Bachelor of Science in History from Oregon State University and Master of Arts from the United States Naval War College, where he was a distinguished graduate.  While he began his military career as a Surface Warfare Officer in 2000, he came to the Navy's Information Warfare community in 2005.  His sea tours include USS VANDERGRIFT (FFG 48), USS CHINOOK (PC 9), Amphibious Squadron Four staff embarked in USS KEARSARGE (LHD 3), and aboard USS GERALD R. FORD (CVN 78).  In addition to numerous deployments at sea, Commander Gadbois deployed to the staff of United Nations Mission in Liberia Information Division in 2005. Ashore, he most recently reported from the Joint Staff Directorate for Intelligence (J2) in the Pentagon. He also served on the staffs of United States Fleet Forces Command, Expeditionary Warfare Training Group Atlantic, and at Joint Intelligence Operations Center Europe Analytic Center (JAC), Molesworth, United Kingdom.

 

Commander Gadbois’ military career is rich in Information Warfare experience. While at the Pentagon, Commander Gadbois collaborated with the Office of the Secretary of Defense, Combatant Commands, and the Defense Intelligence Enterprise to lead the J2 effort to support the planning, execution, and oversight of strategic Global Integration initiatives, messaging, and Joint Force Cyber, Influence, and Information Operations. In addition to providing intelligence support to tactical and operational-level Information Operations to afloat and ashore units and staffs, he also served as the primary instructor for the Navy’s Information Operations Fundamentals Course from 2010 to 2011.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1387

YOLANDA DICKERSON,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

EXPERIMENT IN SELF RELIANCE,

 Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, 

District Judge. (1:12-cv-00264-CCE-JEP)

Submitted: May 23, 2013 Decided: May 28, 2013

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Yolanda Dickerson, Appellant Pro Se. Theresa Sprain, WOMBLE 

CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Yolanda Dickerson appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing her employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. Dickerson v. 

Experiment in Self Reliance, No. 1:12-cv-00264-CCE-JEP (M.D.N.C. 

Feb. 22, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 302.7 Eligible uses for grant funds. ( a ) *Eligible uses.* In general and subject to the more specific uses listed in paragraphs (a)(1) through (3) of this section, grant funds awarded to HBCUs, TCUs or MSIs may be used as appropriate to facilitate educational instruction and learning, including through remote instruction; and grant funds awarded to consortia including Minority Business Enterprises (MBEs) or Tax-Exempt Organizations may be used to operate that MBE or Tax-Exempt Organization. Grant funds awarded under this part may only be used for the following purposes: ( 1 ) The purchase of broadband internet access service, including the installation or upgrade of broadband facilities on a one-time, capital improvement, basis in order to increase or expand broadband capacity and/or connectivity at the eligible institution;
( 2 ) The purchase or lease of eligible equipment and devices for student or patron use, subject to any restrictions and prohibited uses identified in paragraph (d) of this section; and
( 3 ) To hire and train information technology personnel who are a part of the eligible anchor institution, MBE or Tax-Exempt Organization.
( b ) *Student priority for the provision of broadband services, devices, and equipment.* The HBCUs, TCUs or MSI applicant must certify that if it receives a grant under this part to provide broadband internet access service or eligible equipment to students that it will, as a condition of that grant, prioritize students in need, in accordance with the following criteria: ( 1 ) Students who are eligible to receive Federal Pell Grants;
( 2 ) Students who receive any other need-based financial aid from the Federal Government, a State, or the eligible recipient;
( 3 ) Students who are qualifying low-income consumers for the purposes of the program carried out under 47 CFR part 54, subpart E, or any successor regulations;
( 4 ) Students who are low-income individuals as that term is defined in section 312(g) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1058(g)); or
( 5 ) Students who have been approved to receive unemployment insurance benefits under any Federal or State law since March 1, 2020.
( c ) *Prioritization of students and patrons without equipment and/or broadband access.* Any recipient that lends or provides eligible equipment to students or patrons must prioritize the lending or providing of such equipment or devices to students or patrons that the recipient believes do not have access to such equipment.
( d ) *Prohibited uses.* The sale or transfer of any portion of the grant-funded equipment for a thing (including a service) of value during the life of equipment is prohibited. Recipients are required to comply with the property standards, including the use and disposition requirements, contained in 2 CFR 200.311 through 200.316, and with the terms and conditions set forth in the grant award.
§ 54.1717 Administrator of the Emergency Connectivity Fund. ( a ) The Universal Service Administrative Company is appointed the permanent Administrator of the Emergency Connectivity Fund and shall be responsible for administering the Emergency Connectivity Fund.
( b ) The Administrator shall be responsible for reviewing applications for funding, recommending funding commitments, issuing funding commitment decision letters, reviewing invoices and recommending payment of funds, as well as other administration-related duties.
( c ) The Administrator may not make policy, interpret unclear provisions of statutes or rules, or interpret the intent of Congress. Where statutes or the Commission's rules in this subpart are unclear, or do not address a particular situation, the Administrator shall seek guidance from the Commission.
( d ) The Administrator may advocate positions before the Commission and its staff only on administrative matters relating to the Emergency Connectivity Fund.
( e ) The Administrator shall create and maintain a website, as defined in § 54.5, on which applications for services will be posted on behalf of schools and libraries.
( f ) The Administrator shall provide the Commission full access to the data collected pursuant to the administration of the Emergency Connectivity Fund.
( g ) The administrator shall provide performance measurements pertaining to the Emergency Connectivity Fund as requested by the Commission by order or otherwise.
( h ) The Commission shall have the authority to audit all entities reporting data to the Administrator regarding the Emergency Connectivity Fund. When the Commission, the Administrator, or any independent auditor hired by the Commission or the Administrator, conducts audits of the participants of the Emergency Connectivity Fund, such audits shall be conducted in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards.
( i ) The Commission shall establish procedures to verify support amounts provided by the Emergency Connectivity Fund and may suspend or delay support amounts if a party fails to provide adequate verification of the support amounts provided upon reasonable request from the Administrator.
( j ) The Administrator shall make available to whomever the Commission directs, free of charge, any and all intellectual property, including, but not limited to, all records and information generated by or resulting from its role in administering the support mechanisms, if its participation in administering the Emergency Connectivity Fund ends. If its participation in administering the Emergency Connectivity Fund ends, the Administrator shall be subject to close-out audits at the end of its term.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

WILLIAM WHITFIELD GARDNER, ANISH SHAH, RASESH SHAH, PRAVIN SHAH, VEENA SHAH, AND WARREN YU ON

BEHALF OF VASCULAR ACCESS CENTERS, L.P.,

Respondents

v.

VASCULAR ACCESS CENTERS, LLC

AND JAMES F. MCGUCKIN, M.D.,

Petitioners :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 402 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW

, this 12th day of November, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED. Respondents’ Application to Expedite Consideration is DISMISSED AS

MOOT

.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 494

To provide that members of the Armed Forces performing services in the

relief effort in Somalia shall be entitled to certain tax benefits in the

same manner as if such services were performed in a combat zone.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 20, 1993

Mr. REYNOLDS (for himself, Mr. MCHUGH, Mr. WHEAT, Mr. BAKER of Louisiana, Mr. OWENS, and Mr. MONTGOMERY) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To provide that members of the Armed Forces performing

services in the relief effort in Somalia shall be entitled

to certain tax benefits in the same manner as if such

services were performed in a combat zone.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF INDIVIDUALS PERFORMING

4 SERVICES IN OPERATION RESTORE HOPE.

5 (a) GENERAL RULE.—Any individual who performs

6 Operation Restore Hope services shall be entitled to the

7 benefits of the following provisions of the Internal Revenue

8 Code of 1986 in the same manner as if such services were
2

•HR 494 IH

1 performed in an area designated by the President of the

2 United States by Executive order as a ‘‘combat zone’’ for

3 purposes of section 112 of such Code:

4 (1) Section 112 (relating to exclusion of combat

5 pay).

6 (2) Section 692 (relating to income taxes of

7 members of Armed Forces on death).

8 (3) Section 2201 (relating to members of the

9 Armed Forces dying in combat zone or by reason of

10 combat-zone incurred wounds).

11 (4) Section 7508 (relating to time for perform12 ing certain acts postponed by reason of service in

13 combat zone).

14 (b) OPERATION RESTORE HOPE SERVICES.—For

15 purposes of this section, the term ‘‘Operation Restore

16 Hope services’’ means any services in the Armed Forces

17 of the United States if—

18 (1) such services are performed in the area des19 ignated by the President pursuant to this paragraph

20 as the ‘‘Operation Restore Hope area’’, and

21 (2) such services are performed during the pe22 riod beginning on December 3, 1992, and ending on

23 the date designated by the President by Executive

24 order as the date on which substantial involvement
3

•HR 494 IH

1 in relief efforts in Somalia by United States Armed

2 Forces has terminated.

3 For purposes of subsection (a)(4), services in support of

4 the Armed Forces of the United States shall be treated

5 in the same manner as services in such Armed Forces.

6 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The provisions of this sub7 section shall apply to periods beginning on or after

8 December 3, 1992.

Æ
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0703Planning and Managing Security for Major Special Events: Guidelines for Law EnforcementFor law enforcement executives, command staff, and trainers involved in, or providing training in, managing special events in their communities, the safety and security of the event itself, the people who attend the event, as well as the surrounding community, are of the utmost importance. The guide covers all aspects of pre-event planning, security needs during the event, and post-event activities. Topics covered include threat and risk assessments; intelligence; staffing needs and resources; communications; access control and credentialing; traffic and transportation; logistics, training, and public information; hazardous materials; critical infrastructure; demonstrations; and security management.By Edward ConnorsCategories: Police OperationsLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0703Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Aug 2011Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 02:15 (UTC-5) in 0.19 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive