alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4770 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4770

To require the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service 
  to conduct a study to determine the lands and waters comprising the 
  LaBranche Wetlands in St. Charles Parish, Louisiana, and to acquire 
    those lands and waters for inclusion in the Bayou Sauvage Urban 
                       National Wildlife Refuge.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 14, 1994

  Mr. Tauzin introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service 
  to conduct a study to determine the lands and waters comprising the 
  LaBranche Wetlands in St. Charles Parish, Louisiana, and to acquire 
    those lands and waters for inclusion in the Bayou Sauvage Urban 
                       National Wildlife Refuge.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STUDY AND ACQUISITION OF LABRANCHE WETLANDS FOR INCLUSION IN 
              BAYOU SAUVAGE URBAN NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE.

    (a) Study.--Not later than 6 months after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife 
Service (in this section referred to as the ``Director'') shall conduct 
a study to survey and determine the lands and waters that comprise the 
area popularly known as the ``LaBranche Wetlands'', located generally 
along Interstate 10 between New Orleans and Baton Rouge in St. Charles 
Parish, Louisiana. The Director shall provide an opportunity for 
submission by the public of comments on the subject of the study. After 
completion of the study, the Director shall make the results of the 
study available at offices of the United States Fish and Wildlife 
Service in the vicinity of the LaBranche Wetlands.
    (b) Acquisition.--
            (1) In general.--As soon as practicable after completion of 
        the study under subsection (a), the Director shall acquire from 
        willing sellers the lands and waters determined under 
        subsection (a) to comprise the LaBranche Wetlands.
            (2) Price.--As consideration for an area of lands or waters 
        acquired under this subsection, the Director shall pay to the 
        seller the fair market value of the area, determined without 
        considering restrictions on use of the area established under 
        Federal law after the date the seller acquired the area.
    (c) Addition to Refuge.--Lands and waters acquired by the Director 
under subsection (b) are included in and shall be administered by the 
Director as part of the Bayou Sauvage Urban National Wildlife Refuge.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 74
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 74 appear at 64 FR 4055, Jan. 27, 1999.

§ 74.431 Special rules applicable to remote pickup stations. ( a ) Remote pickup mobile stations may be used for the transmission of material from the scene of events which occur outside the studio back to studio or production center. The transmitted material shall be intended for the licensee's own use and may be made available for use by any other broadcast station or cable system.
( b ) Remote pickup mobile or base stations may be used for communications related to production and technical support of the remote program. This includes cues, orders, dispatch instructions, frequency coordination, establishing microwave links, and operational communications. Operational communications are alerting tones and special signals of short duration used for telemetry or control.
( c ) Remote pickup mobile or base stations may communicate with any other station licensed under this subpart.
( d ) Remote pickup mobile stations may be operated as a vehicular repeater to relay program material and communications between stations licensed under this subpart. Precautions shall be taken to avoid interference to other stations and the vehicular repeater shall only be activated by hand-carried or pack-carried units.
( e ) The output of hand-carried or pack-carried transmitter units used with a vehicular repeater is limited to 2.5 watts. The output of a vehicular repeater transmitter used as a talkback unit on an additional frequency is limited to 2.5 watts.
( f ) Remote pickup base and mobile stations in Alaska, Guam, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands may be used for any purpose related to the programming or technical operation of a broadcasting station, except for transmission intended for direct reception by the general public.
( g ) [Reserved]
( h ) In the event that normal aural studio to transmitter circuits are damaged, stations licensed under Subpart D may be used to provide temporary circuits for a period not exceeding 30 days without further authority from the Commission necessary to continue broadcasting.
( i ) Remote pickup mobile or base stations may be used for activities associated with the Emergency Alert System (EAS) and similar emergency survival communications systems. Drills and test are also permitted on these stations, but the priority requirements of § 74.403(b) must be observed in such cases.
[51 FR 4602, Feb. 6, 1986, as amended at 68 FR 12764, Mar. 17, 2003]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with 35 U.S.C. 209(e) and 37 CFR 404.7(a)(I)(i), announcement is made of the intent to grant an exclusive, royalty-bearing, revocable license to U.S. patent number 6,399,332 issued June 4, 2002 entitled “Bacterial Superantigen Vaccines,” and U.S. patent number 6,713,284 issued March 30, 2004 entitled “Bacterial Superantigen Vaccines,” and all pending foreign patents to Integrated Biotherapeutics, Inc. with its principal place of business at Frederick Innovative Technology Center, Rosenstock Hall, Frederick, MD 21702.

# ADDRESSES:

Commander, U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, ATTN: Command Judge Advocate, MCMR-JA, 504 Scott Street, Fort Detrick, Frederick, MD 21702-5012.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For patent issues, Ms. Elizabeth Arwine, Patent Attorney, (301) 619-7808. For licensing issues, Dr. Paul Mele, Office of Research & Technology Assessment, (301) 619-6664, both at telefax (301) 619-5034.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license can file written objections along                           ( print page 47783)                        with supporting evidence, if any, 15 days from the date of this publication. Written objections are to be filed  with the Command Judge Advocate (see                     **ADDRESSES**                    ).                

Brenda S. Bowen, 

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 06-7007 Filed 8-17-06; 8:45am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
- ks 1970
: 

OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF’TEXAS 

I . AUSTIN 

xoaorzble JimI?. Sovell 

county Attorney . 

Xardexixm County 

.: c$suxih, TCXRU 

pear Slr,,r 

cent date, and quote fro= your 

. 

: 

.- 

‘.. 
. ;. %x2 

. ,._ .-,.- 

Bonorable Jim W. Sovell, Pace 2' 

' . 

'Third: Does the reglotration bf a varrant 

by a County Treasurer mount to a disbumcn3nt 

OP '=onsy paid out by hln' as contemplated by 

tit. 3941, E.C.S. 1925, rhea appllod to the fore& 

80% facts?" 

Your qucmtiona nmibors 1 and I; ave an3vored in the negatwo.. __-~- 

. . 

Article 3941,.Varnon8s A.nnotatedGv3.l Statutee, reads, 

: in pert, 8s follovs: 

. .i "The County Tre33urcr shall rocalpo comi3- 

don3 petp x3onq rcce%vcd and paid out by : 

him. .VL(&de~*sbora ours! 

In out opinion'the statute is plafn that the'Tma3wer 

is entitled to cozmisslons only on money rocoived and soaeyapald 

out. There is no dicbuwc;reEt of cozuty fuuds at the tiw of the 

iseu3jxe of warrat or at the tirze of registration of sme. It 

13 sflirply the ccm.uty's pmmioe to pay at 8039 future Qate. :- :.. '-' 

. ., 

In reply to your Soconcl quecti& tm advise that thia'departmnt has held in Opinion Ro. O-)+094 upon thematurity of each 

sorien of vam2at3 0r.fudi.q bond3 end th.elr~cancalI?.ation by paynent fron the Comty Treasury, the Treasurer my Ie:8Uy charge . 

his comd..aolou oa tm amxat paid out. 

.I 

The followi& authosities app3ar to support auk vievs 

a3 oxprssecd herein:' : . 

B3~103? COUltg va. T&ylOT, 22 S.U.'982j 

_- 

pamw vs.'Araneas OOUnty, 53 S.l?. 637 (W2lt XV?fUS&)j 

&Kinney VS. Roblnso;l, 19 S.U.. 699.. 

.zi 

"<'~rmstlng that tli%3 ancwer5 you% ~questions, v&a*e 

. Very truly your3 . 

co& RS
32.1     Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer of Genesis Capital Corporation of Nevada pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Genesis Capital
Corporation of Nevada (the "Company") for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned Richard Astrom, Chief Executive Officer of Genesis
Capital Corporation of Nevada, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Dated:
February 19, 2008





/s/
RICHARD ASTROM


Richard
Astrom


Chief
Executive Officer
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1


        Certifications of Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial
         Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


     Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, we, Barry
Schechter, Chief Executive Officer, and Philip Bolles, Chief Financial Officer
of Island Pacific, Inc. (the "Registrant"), hereby certify, based upon each of
our respective knowledge:

     (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant, to which this
     certification is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies with
     the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
     of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Registrant.


Date:  November 12, 2007                       /s/ Barry Schechter
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Barry Schechter
                                               Chief Executive Officer


                                               /s/ Philip C. Bolles
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Philip C. Bolles
                                               Chief Financial Officer


This certificate accompanies this annual report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and will not be deemed "filed" by the
Registrant for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. This certificate will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing, except to the extent that the Registrant specifically
incorporates it by reference.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 128 (Monday, July 3, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 41013]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16682]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 00-1245; MM Docket No. 99-84; RM-9501, RM-9594]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Stratford and Lincoln, NH

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of Peter George, allots Channel 
254A to Stratford, NH, as the community's first local aural service. 
See 64 FR 14429, May 21, 1999. Channel 254A can be allotted to 
Stratford in compliance with the Commission's minimum distance 
separation requirements with a site restriction of 8.6 kilometers (5.3 
miles) north, at coordinates 44-43-54 NL; 71-34-10 WL, to avoid a 
short-spacing to vacant and unapplied-for Channel 256A at Whitefield, 
NH. Canadian concurrence in the allotment has been obtained since 
Stratford is located within 320 kilometers (200 miles) of the U.S.-
Canadian border. The petition and counterproposal filed by Barry P. 
Lunderville to allot Channel 254A to Lincoln, NH, is dismissed for 
failure to comply with the subscription and verification requirements 
of Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules. A filing window for Channel 
254A at Stratford will not be opened at this time. Instead, the issue 
of opening a filing window for this channel will be addressed by the 
Commission in a subsequent order.

DATES: Effective July 24, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leslie K. Shapiro, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 99-84, adopted May 31, 2000, and 
released July 9, 2000. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, 
DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Services, 
Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334. 336.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under New 
Hampshire, is amended by adding Stratford, Channel 254A.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 00-16682 Filed 6-30-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
§ 90.623 Limitations on the number of frequencies assignable for conventional systems. ( a ) The maximum number of frequency pairs that may be assigned to a licensee for operation in the conventional mode in a given area is five (5).
( b ) Where an applicant proposes to operate a conventional radio system to provide facilities for the use of a single person or entity eligible under subparts B or C of this part, the applicant may be assigned only the number of frequency pairs justified on the basis of the requirement of the proposed single user of the system.
( c ) No non-SMR licensee will be authorized an additional frequency pair for a conventional system within 64 kilometers (40 miles) of an existing conventional system, except where: ( 1 ) The additional frequency pair will be used to provide radio facilities to a single entity and the additional frequency pair is justified on the basis of the requirements of the proposed single user; or,
( 2 ) The licensee's existing frequency pair(s) is loaded to prescribed levels.
( d ) No licensee will be authorized frequencies for a conventional system if that licensee is operating an unloaded trunked system or has an application pending for a trunked system to serve multiple subscribers within 64 km (40 miles) of the requested conventional system.
[47 FR 41032, Sept. 16, 1982, as amended at 48 FR 44559, Sept. 29, 1983; 48 FR 51929, Nov. 15, 1983; 58 FR 44963, Aug. 25, 1993; 59 FR 59966, Nov. 21, 1994; 62 FR 18935, Apr. 17, 1997]
NOT FOR PUB LIC ATION UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C U IT
VIC TOR IA HALL; R

A LPH HALL, ) No. 12-15523 individually

and on be ha lf of J.H. ) a m inor, ) D.C . No. 2:11-c v-00294-R OS ) Pla intiffs - Appe lla

nts, ) M EM OR A NDUM * ) v. ) ) C OOLIDGE UNIFIED SC HOOL ) DISTR IC T NO. 21, ) ) De fe nda nt - Appe lle e . ) )

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ariz o na R osly n O. Silve r, Se nior Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Nove m

be r 6, 2013 ** San Fran c isc o , C a lifornia B e fore : FAR

R IS, FER NANDEZ, a

nd IKUTA, C irc u i t Judge s. Vic toria and R a l ph Ha l l a

ppe a l the distric t c ourt’ s orde r whic h a warde d 

# FIL ED
NOV 14 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U

. S

. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a

ppropria te for public ation a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3.

** T he pa ne l una nim ously finds this c a se suita

ble for de c ision without ora l argum e nt. Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).the m

attorne y ’ s fe e s a fte r the y pre v a ile d in the ir a c tion a g a inst C oolidgeUnifie d Sc hool Distric t No. 21. Se e 20 U.S.C . § 1415(i)(3)(B )(i)(I). W e a ffirm
. W e have c are fully

re vie we d the re c ord a

nd we hold tha

t the distric t c ourt did not a buse its disc re tion 1 whe n it de te rm ine d the “ ra te s pre va iling in the c o m m unity in whic h the a c tion or proc e e d ing a rose for the kind a

nd qua lity of se rvic e s furnishe d” 2 and the n c a lc ulate d the fe e award ba se d upon thoserate s. 3 AFFIR M ED.

1 Se e Unite d State s. v. Hinkson, 585 F.3d 1247, 1261–62 (9th C ir. 2009) (e n ba nc ); Sha piro e x re l. Sha

piro v. Pa ra dise Va l le y

Unifie d Sc h. Dist. No. 69, 374 F.3d 857, 861 (9th C ir. 2004).

2 Se e 20 U.S.C . § 1415(i)(3)(C ); se e a lso B lum v. Ste n son, 465 U.S. 886, 895 n.11, 104 S. C t . 1541, 1547 n.11, 79 L. Ed. 2d 891 (1984); C hriste n s e n v. Ste v e d oring Se rvs. of Am ., 557 F.3d 1049, 1053 (9th C ir. 2009); Sha piro, 374 F.3d at 865–66; B arjon v. Da lton, 132 F.3d 496, 502 (9th C ir. 1997); Gre ate r L.A. C ounc il on De a fne ss v. C m ty . Te le vision of S. C a l., 813 F.2d 217, 221 (9th C ir. 1987).
3 The Ha lls sugge st tha t the State B ar of Ariz ona ’ s, 2010 Ec onom ic s of La w Pra c tic e i n Ariz ona , upon whic h the distric t c ourt re lie d, is ina d m issiblehe arsay . Howe ve r, tha

t issuewa s not ra i se d be fore the distric t c ourt. W e de c l ine to c onside r it. Se e O’ Guinn v. Love loc k C orr. C t r., 502 F.3d 1056, 1063 n.3 (9th C ir. 2007); Pfingston v. R

ona n Eng’ g C o., 284 F.3d 999, 1003–04 (9th C ir. 2002).

2
**Exhibit31.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER**

**OF**

**COMMERCIAL NATIONAL FINANCIALCORPORATION**

****

**I, Ryan M. Glista,Chief Financial Officer, Commercial National Financial Corporationcertify that:**

****

I have reviewed this annual reporton Form 10-K of Commercial National FinancialCorporation;

****

Based on my knowledge, this annualreport does not contain any untrue statement of material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis annual report;

****

Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;

****

The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15) for the registrant and wehave:

****

**a)     designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrol and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this annual report is being prepared;**

****

evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and

****

disclosed in this report any changein the Corporation’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Corporation’s fourthfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Corporation’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and

****

The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and to the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors:

****

**a)     all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial data;and**

****

**b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.**

****

****

****
| Date: March 26,2004 | By: | /s/ Ryan M.Glista      |
|---------------------|-----|------------------------|
|                     |     | Ryan M. Glista         |
|                     |     | Chief FinancialOfficer |
#### § 3.27 Amended application.

Changes in circumstances that cause information previously supplied to the FCC to be incorrect or incomplete and that could affect the approval process, require the submission of an amended application. The amended application should be mailed to the Commission immediately following such change. See also §§ 3.24 and 3.51.