alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 76.1706 Signal leakage logs and repair records. Cable operators shall maintain a log showing the date and location of each leakage source identified pursuant to § 76.614, the date on which the leakage was repaired, and the probable cause of the leakage. The log shall be kept on file for a period of two years and shall be made available to authorized representatives of the Commission upon request. Note to § 76.1705 :
If a signal leakage log is being used to meet proof of performance test recordkeeping requirements in accordance with § 76.601, such a log must be retained for the period specified in § 76.601(d).
Exhibit 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

      KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears
below constitutes and appoints Louis Lipschitz and Christopher Kay and each of
them, his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power
of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place
and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Toys "R" Us, Inc. for the fiscal year ended February 3, 2001, and any amendments
thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto
said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to
do and perform such and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done,
as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person,
hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or
any of them, or his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause
to be done by virtue hereof.

      This Power of Attorney may be executed in separate counterparts, each of
which shall be an original, but all such counterparts shall together constitute
one and the same instrument.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this Power of
Attorney as of the 6th day of March, 2001.

      Name                     Title                           Signature
      ----                     -----                           ---------
Michael Goldstein       Chairman of the Board            /s/ Michael Goldstein
                                                         -----------------------

RoAnn Costin            Director                         /s/ RoAnn Costin
                                                         -----------------------

John H. Eyler           Director                         /s/ John H. Eyler
                                                         -----------------------

Calvin Hill             Director                         /s/ Calvin Hill
                                                         -----------------------

Nancy Karch             Director                         /s/ Nancy Karch
                                                         -----------------------

Shirley Strum Kenny     Director                         /s/ Shirley Strum Kenny
                                                         -----------------------

Charles Lazarus         Director, Chairman Emeritus      /s/ Charles Lazarus
                                                         -----------------------

Norman S. Matthews      Director                         /s/ Norman S. Matthews
                                                         -----------------------

Arthur B. Newman        Director                         /s/ Arthur B. Newman
                                                         -----------------------
§ 65.100 Participation and acceptance of service designation. ( a ) All interstate exchange access carriers, their customers, and any member of the public may participate in rate of return proceedings to determine the authorized unitary interstate exchange access or individual interstate exchange access rates of return authorized pursuant to § 65.102.
( b ) Participants shall state in their initial pleading in a prescription proceeding whether they wish to receive service of documents and other material filed in the proceeding. Participants that wish to receive service by hand on the filing dates when so required by this part 65 shall specify in their initial pleading in a prescription proceeding, as specified in § 65.103 (b) and (c), an agent for acceptance of service by hand in the District of Columbia. The participant may elect in its pleading to receive service by mail or upon an agent at another location. When such an election is made, other participants need not complete service on the filing date, and requests for extension of time due to delays in completion of service will not be entertained.
[60 FR 28544, June 1, 1995]
#### §§ 76.1005-76.1010 [Reserved]
No. 11-8763.

#### Padilla *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal, 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-214.

#### Melendez Camilo *v.*United States.

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 10-10865.

#### Woodmansee *v.*Steele, Warden.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 24  ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS INC.  POWER OF ATTORNEY  KNOW
ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below
hereby constitutes and appoints each of Mark W. DeYoung, John L. Shroyer and
Keith D. Ross, with full power to each to act without the other, his or her
true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution,
for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Alliant Techsystems
Inc. (the Corporation) for the Corporations fiscal year ended March 31,
2010, and any or all amendments to such Form 10-K, and to file the same,
with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, and to file the same with such other
authorities as necessary, granting unto each such attorney-in-fact and agent
full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all
intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying
and confirming all that each such attorney-in-fact and agent, or his
substitute, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.  Dated
and effective as of the 3rd of May 2010.   /s/ Frances D. Cook
  
  /s/
  Mark W. DeYoungFrances
  D. Cook
  
  
  Mark
  W. DeYoungDirector
  
  
  Director,
  President andChief
  Executive Officer/s/ Martin C. Faga
  
  /s/
  Ronald R. FoglemanMartin
  C. Faga
  
  
  Ronald
  R. FoglemanDirector
  
  
  Chairman
  of the Board/s/ Tig H. Krekel
  
  /s/
  Douglas L. MaineTig
  H. Krekel
  
  
  Douglas
  L. MaineDirector
  
  
  Director/s/ Roman Martinez IV
  
  /s/
  Mark H. RonaldRoman
  Martinez IV
  
  
  Mark
  H. RonaldDirector
  
  
  Director/s/ William G. Van DykeWilliam
  G. Van DykeDirector
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 1463

In re: JEFFREY A. MARTINOVICH , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

. (4:12

- cr - 00101

- AWA

- RJK

- 1; 4:18

- cv - 00028

- AWA)

Submitted : August 16, 2019 Decided: August 20, 2019

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and AGEE and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

. Jeffrey A. Martinovich, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jeffrey A. Martinovich petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his reques t s that the district court rule on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and his moti on for an issuance of a certificate of appealability. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that , on May 6, 2019, the district court denied Martinovich’s § 2255 motion,

an d on May 21, 2019, the district court denied a certificate of appealability. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Martinovich ’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and to supple ment the mandamus petition . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
No. 11-5889.

#### Kent *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
Exhibit 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Celadon Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William E. Meek, Principal Financial Officer, Vice President, and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:  September 2, 2011
/s/ William E. MeekWilliam E. Meek

Principal Financial Officer, Vice President, and Treasurer


Back to Form 10-K
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the
undersigned certifies that this periodic report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of IKONICS
Corporation.

Date: August 13, 2004                       /s/ William C. Ulland
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            William C. Ulland
                                             Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
                                             and President

Date: August 13, 2004                       /s/ Jon Gerlach
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Jon Gerlach
                                             Chief Financial Officer
                                             and Vice President of Finance
No. 10-1528.

#### National Association of Home Builders *v.*San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Exhibit 13.1



Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title
18, United States Code)



Pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Teléfonos de México, S.A. de C.V., a sociedad anónima de capital variableorganized under the laws of Mexico (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                         |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: June 27, 2005 |  | /s/ Jaime Chico Pardo  
|                     |  | Name:                   |  | Jaime Chico Pardo      
|                     |  | Title:                  |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                     | 
|Dated: June 27, 2005 |  | /s/ Adolfo Cerezo Pérez
|                     |  | Name:                   |  | Adolfo Cerezo Pérez    
|                     |  | Title:                  |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### The Realty Transfer Company, Appellant, *v.*Charles E. Kimball, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

February, 1910.)

Principal and agent — Eights and liabilities of principal as to third person — Extent of actual authority of agent to bind principal (including implied authority) — Power to receive payment or collect debt — Payment before due.

An agent authorized to collect rents is not to be presumed authorized to receive on the 28th day of April rent that does not fall due until the 1st day of May; and such a payment does not discharge the tenant unless the landlord ratifies the payment or receives the money paid.

Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Mew York, first district, borough of Manhattan, rendered in favor of the defendant.

Horace London, for appellant.

Thomas A. McCoIe, for respondent.

Bijur, J.

The action was for the recovery of fifty dollars, being one month’s rent, for the month of May, due on the first of May, under a written lease entered into between plaintiff and defendant. Apart from any question as to the weight of evidence, the testimony of defendant was that he had paid the rent due May first to plaintiff’s agent on the twenty-eighth day of April; and there is no proof or attempt to prove that plaintiff ratified this premature payment or actually received the money from the agent. Authority to an agent to receive payment of an indebtedness does not confer upon him the power to receive payment before maturity. Smith v. Kidd, 68 N. Y. 130, 141.

*186The judgment should he reversed and new trial ordered, 'with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Seabury and Lehman, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Netfabric Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Vasan
Thatham, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

August 15, 2005

                                             /s/Vasan Thatham
                                             ---------------------------------
                                             Name: Vasan Thatham
                                             Title: Chief Financial Officer

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Netfabric Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Netfabric
Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
§ 90.615 Individual channels available in the General Category in 806-824/851-869 MHz band. The General Category will consist of channels 231-260a and 511-550 at locations farther than 110 km (68.4 miles) from the U.S./Mexico border and 140 km (87 miles) from the U.S./Canadian border. All entities will be eligible for licensing on these channels except as described in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section. ( a ) In a given 800 MHz NPSPAC region, any channel in the 231-260 range which is vacated by a licensee relocating to channels 551-830 and which remains vacant after band reconfiguration will be available as follows: ( 1 ) Only to eligible applicants in the Public Safety Category until three years after the release of a public notice announcing the completion of band reconfiguration in that region;
( 2 ) Only to eligible applicants in the Public Safety or Critical Infrastructure Industry Categories from three to five years after the release of a public notice announcing the completion of band reconfiguration in that region;
( 3 ) To all entities five years after release of a public notice announcing the completion of band reconfiguration in that region.
( b ) In a given 800 MHz NPSPAC region, any channel in the 231-260 range which is vacated by a licensee relocating to channels 511-550 and remains vacant after band reconfiguration will be available as follows: ( 1 ) Only to eligible applicants in the Public Safety Category until three years after the release of a public notice announcing the completion of band reconfiguration in that region;
( 2 ) Only to eligible applicants in the Public Safety or Critical Infrastructure Industry Categories from three to five years after the release of a public notice announcing the completion of band reconfiguration in that region;
( 3 ) To all entities five years after release of a public notice announcing the completion of band reconfiguration in that region.
( c ) Spectrum Block F1 consists of channels 236-260.
( d ) Applicants may begin to license interstitial channels (denoted with an “a” after the channel number) only after the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau and the Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau jointly release a public notice announcing the availability of those channels for licensing in a National Public Safety Planning Advisory Committee region.
[70 FR 6759, Feb. 8, 2005, as amended at 70 FR 76708, Dec. 28, 2005; 83 FR 61100, Nov. 27, 2018]
§ 69.602 Board of directors. ( a ) For purposes of this section, the association membership shall be divided into three subsets: ( 1 ) The first subset shall consist of the telephone companies owned and operated by the seven Regional Bell Holding Companies;
( 2 ) The second subset shall consist of all other telephone companies with annual operating revenues in excess of forty million dollars;
( 3 ) The third subset shall consist of all other telephone companies. All commonly controlled companies shall be deemed to be one company for purposes of this section.
( b ) There shall be fifteen directors of the association.
( c ) Two directors shall represent the first subset, two directors shall represent the second subset, six directors shall represent the third subset, and five directors shall represent all three subsets.
( d ) No director who represents all three subsets shall be a current or former officer or employee of the association or of any association member, or have a business relationship or other interest that could interfere with his or her exercise of independent judgment.
( e ) Each subset of the association membership shall select the directors who will represent it through elections in which each member of the subset shall be entitled to one vote for each director position within that subset.
( f ) The association membership shall select the directors who will represent all three subsets through an election in which each member of the association shall be entitled to one vote for each director position. No director representing all three subsets may serve for more than six consecutive calendar years without standing for an election in which that director is opposed by at least one other candidate meeting the qualifications in paragraph (d) of this section.
( g ) At least one director representing all three subsets shall be a member of each committee of association directors.
( h ) For each access element or group of access elements for which voluntary pooling is permitted, there shall be a committee that is responsible for the preparation of charges for the associated access elements that comply with all applicable sections in this part.
[60 FR 19530, Apr. 19, 1995, as amended at 68 FR 46502, Aug. 6, 2003]
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a)
 
 I, James L. Rizzo, certify that:
 
 1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.; and
 
 2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
        statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
 
 Date:
          November 2, 2018 /s/ JAMES L. RIZZOJames L. RizzoSenior Vice President and Comptroller (Principal Financial Officer)
No. 10-10876.

#### Thompson *v.*Dittman, Warden.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 64.6110 Consumer disclosure of Inmate Calling Services rates. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 77366 , Sept. 20, 2024.
( a ) Providers must clearly, accurately, and conspicuously disclose their interstate, intrastate, and international rates and Ancillary Service Charges to consumers on their websites or in another reasonable manner readily available to consumers. In connection with international rates, providers shall also separately disclose the rate component for terminating calls to each country where that provider terminates International Calls.
( b ) Providers must clearly label the Facility-Related Rate Component (either the Legally Mandated Facility Rate Component or the Contractually Prescribed Facility Rate Component) identified in § 64.6030(d) as a separate line item on Consumer bills for the recovery of permissible facility-related costs contained in Site Commission payments. To be clearly labeled, the Facility-Related Rate Component shall: ( 1 ) Identify the Provider's obligation to pay a Site Commission as either imposed by state statutes or laws or regulations that are adopted pursuant to state administrative procedure statutes where there is notice and an opportunity for public comment that operates independently of the contracting process between Correctional Institutions and Providers or subject to a contract with the Correctional Facility;
( 2 ) Where the Site Commission is imposed by state statute, or law or regulation adopted pursuant to state administrative procedure statutes where there is notice and an opportunity for public comment and that operates independently of the contracting process between Correctional Institutions and Providers, specify the relevant statute, law, or regulation.
( 3 ) Identify the amount of the Site Commission payment, expressed as a per-minute or per-call charge, a percentage of revenue, or a flat fee; and
( 4 ) Identify the amount charged to the Consumer for the call or calls on the bill.
( c ) Providers must clearly label all charges for International Calls in § 64.6030(e) as a separate line item on Consumer bills. To be clearly labeled, providers must identify the amount charged to the Consumer for the International Call, including the costs paid by the provider to its underlying international providers to terminate the International Call to the international destination of the call.
[87 FR 40732, July 28, 2021, as amended at 87 FR 7956, Feb. 11, 2022]