alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4872

To develop a program regarding career opportunities by making such information available on publicly accessible networks and other electronic media.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 1, 1994

Mr. MCHALE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Education and Labor

A BILL

To develop a program regarding career opportunities by making such information available on publicly accessible networks and other electronic media.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Career Awareness

5 Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. CAREER INFORMATION AVAILABILITY.

7 (a) PROGRAM.—The Secretary of Education, in con8 sultation with the Secretary of Labor, shall develop an age

9 specific program for students from kindergarten through
2

•HR 4872 IH

1 12th grade regarding career opportunities and the skills

2 necessary to pursue such careers.

3 (b) DEADLINE.—Not later than one year after the

4 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall de5 velop and make available the program described in sub6 section (a).

7 SEC. 2. INFORMATION NETWORK.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Education shall,

9 to the maximum extent practicable, coordinate with other

10 Federal agencies and specifically with local educational

11 agencies to make available the program developed pursu12 ant to section 2 on publicly accessible networks and other

13 electronic media.

14 (b) CURRENT INFORMATION AND DISSEMINATION.—

15 The Secretary of Education shall—

16 (1) regularly update the age specific programs

17 regarding career opportunities;

18 (2) use reasonable means to notify other Fed19 eral agencies and local educational agencies regard20 ing the availability of such information; and

21 (3) create and ensure currency in the dissemi22 nation of the career information.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4577 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 573
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4577

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 29 (legislative day, June 7), 1994

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

              August 12 (legislative day, August 11), 1994

               Reported by Mr. Baucus, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
at 242 East Main Street in Bowling Green, Kentucky, as the ``William H. 
        Natcher Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 242 
East Main Street in Bowling Green, Kentucky, shall be known and 
designated as the ``William H. Natcher Federal Building and United 
States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``William H. Natcher Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 27, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 573

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4577

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
at 242 East Main Street in Bowling Green, Kentucky, as the ``William H. 
        Natcher Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

              August 12 (legislative day, August 11), 1994

                       Reported without amendment
```
#### § 90.411 Civil defense communications.

The licensee of any station authorized under this part may, on a voluntary basis, transmit communications necessary for the implementation of civil defense activities assigned such station by local civil defense authorities during an actual or simulated emergency, including drills and tests. The Commission may at any time order the discontinuance of such special use of the authorized facilities.

[49 FR 36376, Sept. 17, 1984]
32.1     Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of Genesis Capital
         Corporation of Nevada pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act
         of 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Genesis Capital
Corporation of Nevada (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned Richard Astrom, Chief Executive Officer of Genesis
Capital Corporation of Nevada, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 11, 2006

                                      /s/ RICHARD ASTROM
                                      -----------------------
                                      Richard Astrom
                                      Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.15


GAIAM,
INC.


EXECUTIVE
OFFICER SALARIES


	
  Name

  	
   

  	
  Title

  	
   

  	
  Annual Base Salary

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Jirka Rysavy

  	
   

  	
  Chairman
  and Chief Executive Officer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  300,000

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Lynn Powers

  	
   

  	
  President,
  Chief Executive Officer of North American Operations, Secretary

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  300,000

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Vilia Valentine

  	
   

  	
  Chief Financial Officer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  200,000

  	
   

  



Ms. Powers received a
bonus of $50,000 in May 2006.
No. 10-10753.

#### Hurst *v.*Hantke et al.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Edgar Marchand *et al. vs.*Ernest Tellier *et al.*

APRIL 26, 1948.

Present : Flynn, C. J., Capotosto, Baker, Condon and O’Connell, JJ.

Per Curiam.

This is a petition for a writ of certiorari. A citation to show cause why the prayer of the petition should not be granted was duly issued and served on the respondents who appeared and filed an answer.

*67The principal relief sought in the petition, which was brought by eight members of the common council of the city of Woonsocket against the president and clerk of that body, was that the election of certain officers of that city at a meeting of the common council held on October 27, 1947 be declared to be illegal and null and void; that the official minutes thereof which recorded such election and also the final adjournment of the meeting be quashed; and for such other and further relief in that connection as the court might deem necessary.

Apparently the gist of the complainants’ case is that the election of officers and the adjournment of the meeting, as above mentioned, were consummated on a voice vote of a minority of the members of the common council, whereas, as a matter of fact, certain of the complainants had properly demanded roll-call votes on the questions in dispute and were supported by all the complainants constituting a majority but had been denied such roll-call votes by the alleged improper rulings of the presiding officer. The respondents, however, contended that in the circumstances the rulings in question were justified.

Not long after the hearing on the merits, this court was informed by the attorneys representing the respective parties that a special meeting of the common council of Woonsocket had been held March 16, 1948, and a true copy of the pertinent portion of the minutes of that meeting attested by the city clerk was submitted to us by the attorneys. From this copy it appears that at such special meeting fourteen of the fifteen members of the common council were present; that certain persons were nominated and elected to fill the same offices which the council had attempted to fill at the questioned meeting of October 27, 1947; that such persons were elected on a roll-call vote; and that the special meeting was finally adjourned on motion after an affirmative vote of the same kind.

From this it appears that, by the action of the respondents and by the council itself as a whole at the special *68meeting, the petitioners to all intents and purposes have now obtained the substantial relief they had sought by the petition undér consideration. This being so it is our opinion that the questions raised in the instant case are in effect moot. We therefore see no reason for considering such questions further at this time.

*Israel Rabinowitz,*for petitioners.

*Irving I. Zimmerman,*City Solicitor, *John H. Doris,*for respondents.

The court is of the opinion that in the existing circumstances the present petition should be denied and dismissed without prejudice.
No. 11-125.

#### Holmes *v.*East Cooper Community Hospital, Inc., et al.

Sup. Ct. S. C. Certiorari denied.
- SC 1978
- SC 1978 2
- SC 1978
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0806Combatting Youth Violence in American Cities: Programs and Partnerships in 30 CitiesYouth violence is a major challenge for American police chiefs, schools, and municipal leaders, undermining the public safety of cities across the nation and destroying the lives of many of our young people. According to a 2015 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Fact Sheet on Youth Violence, it sent more than 630,000 young people to emergency rooms in 2012 alone. Because of the complex nature of its origins and the special needs of both victims and perpetrators, this problem resists traditional law enforcement solutions. In an effort to stem the toll youth violence is taking on our communities, the U.S. Conference of Mayors asked the leaders of 30 cities for help in developing a report which can be used as a tool to prevent and respond to these crimes. This report, the result of their efforts, describes the problems they have encountered and the practices and programs they have found most helpful.By Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS Office)Categories: Community Partnerships • Youth SafetyLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0806Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Jun 2016Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 00:42 (UTC-5) in 0.19 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
#### § 78.101 Power limitations.

(a) On any authorized frequency, the average power delivered to an antenna shall be the minimum amount of power necessary to carry out the communications desired. In no event shall the average transmitter power or equivalent isotropically radiated power (EIRP) exceed the values specified below.

| Frequency band (MHz) | Maximum allowable transmitter power—mobile (W) | Maximum allowable EIRP1 2 | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Fixed (dBW) | Mobile (dBW) |
| 2,025 to 2,110 | 20.0 | | + 35 |
| 6,425 to 6,525 | 20.0 | | + 35 |
| 6,875 to 7,125 | 20.0 | | + 35 |
| 12,700 to 13,250 | 1.5 | + 55 | + 45 |
| 17,700 to 18,600 | | + 55 | |
| 18,600 to 18,8001 | | + 35 | |
| 18,800 to 19,700 | | + 55 | |
| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 The power delivered to the antenna is limited to −3 dBW. | | | |
| 2 Stations licensed based on an application filed before April 16, 2003, for EIRP values exceeding those specified above, may continue to operate indefinitely in accordance with the terms of their current authorizations, subject to periodic renewal. | | | |

(b) LDS stations shall use for the visual signal-vestigial sideband AM transmission. When vestigial sideband AM transmission is used the peak power of the visual signal on all channels shall be maintained within 2 dB of equality. The mean power of the aural signal on each channel shall not exceed a level of 7 dB below the peak power of the visual signal.

(c) The EIRP of transmitters that use Automatic Transmitter Power Control (ATPC) shall not exceed the EIRP specified on the station authorization. The EIRP of non-ATPC transmitters shall be maintained as near as practicable to the EIRP specified on the station authorization.

[[45 FR 78694](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/45-FR-78694), Nov. 26, 1980, as amended at [52 FR 7144](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/52-FR-7144), Mar. 9, 1987; [65 FR 48182](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/65-FR-48182), Aug. 7, 2000; [68 FR 12776](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/68-FR-12776), Mar. 17, 2003]
#### § 80.353 [Reserved]
Editorial Note on Part 74
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 74 appear at 64 FR 4055, Jan. 27, 1999.

§ 74.32 Operation in the 17.7-17.8 GHz and 17.8-19.7 GHz bands. The following exclusion areas and coordination areas are established to minimize or avoid harmful interference to Federal Government earth stations receiving in the 17.7-19.7 GHz band: ( a ) No application seeking authority for fixed stations supporting the operations of Multichannel Video Programming Distributors (MVPD) in the 17.7-17.8 GHz band or to operate in the 17.8-19.7 GHz band for any service will be accepted for filing if the proposed station is located within 20 km of Denver, CO (39°43′ N., 104°46′ W.) or Washington, DC (38°48′ N., 76°52′ W.).
( b ) Any application for a new station license to provide MVPD operations in the 17.7-17.8 GHz band or to operate in the 17.8-19.7 GHz band for any service, or for modification of an existing station license in these bands which would change the frequency, power, emission, modulation, polarization, antenna height or directivity, or location of such a station, must be coordinated with the Federal Government by the Commission before an authorization will be issued, if the station or proposed station is located in whole or in part within any of the following areas: ( 1 ) *Denver, CO area:* ( i ) Between latitudes 41°30′ N. and 38°30′ N. and between longitudes 103°10′ W. and 106°30′ W.
( ii ) Between latitudes 38°30′ N. and 37°30′ N. and between longitudes 105°00′ W. and 105°50′ W.
( iii ) Between latitudes 40°08′ N. and 39°56′ N. and between longitudes 107°00′ W. and 107°15′ W.
( 2 ) *Washington, DC area:* ( i ) Between latitudes 38°40′ N. and 38°10′ N. and between longitudes 78°50′ W. and 79°20′ W.
( ii ) Within 178 km of 38°48′ N, 76°52′ W.
( 3 ) *San Miguel, CA area:* ( i ) Between latitudes 34°39′ N. and 34°00′ N. and between longitudes 118°52′ W. and 119°24′ W.
( ii ) Within 200 km of 35°44′ N., 120°45′ W.
( 4 ) *Guam area:* Within 100 km of 13°35′ N., 144°51′ E.
Note to § 74.32: The coordinates cited in this section are specified in terms of the “North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83).” [80 FR 38908, July 7, 2015]
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5019 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5019

 To rescind the fee required for the use of public recreation areas at 
   lakes and reservoirs under the jurisdiction of the Army Corps of 
                   Engineers, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 21, 1994

 Mr. Williams introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Public Works and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To rescind the fee required for the use of public recreation areas at 
   lakes and reservoirs under the jurisdiction of the Army Corps of 
                   Engineers, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RESCISSION OF RECREATIONAL USER FEES.

    (a) In General.--Section 210(b) of the Flood Control Act of 1968 
(16 U.S.C. 460d-3(b)) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(b) User Fees.--User fees at the lakes and reservoirs referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be collected by officers and employees of the 
United States only from users of highly developed facilities requiring 
continuous presence of personnel for maintenance and supervision of the 
facilities and shall not be collected for access to or use of water 
areas, undeveloped or lightly developed shoreland (including beaches), 
picnic grounds, overlook sites, scenic drives, or boat launching ramps 
where no mechanical or hydraulic equipment is provided.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment for Campsites.--Section 4(b) of the Land 
and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 (16 U.S.C. 460l-6a(b)) is 
amended by inserting before the last sentence the following: ``At each 
lake or reservoir under the jurisdiction of the United States Army 
Corps of Engineers where camping is permitted, the Corps of Engineers 
shall provide at least 1 primitive campground, containing designated 
campsites, sanitary facilities, and vehicular access where no charge 
shall be imposed.''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON REENACTMENT.

    No law may be enacted providing for establishment and collection of 
fees by the Secretary of the Army for the use of developed recreation 
sites and facilities unless such law also requires that any fees so 
collected at any facility be deposited into a special account 
established in the Treasury for carrying out activities at such 
facility and that funds deposited into such account only be expended at 
such facility for carrying out activities which generated such funds.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 15.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement (Form F-3 No. 333-111040) of Teléfonos de México, S.A. de C.V. and in the related prospectus of our report dated March 6, 2006, except for Notes 2 and 15g), as to which the date is April 7, 2006,and Notes 6 and 19, as to which the date is May 19, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Teléfonos de México, S.A. de C.V. included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31,2005. 

Mancera, S.C., 

A Member Firm of 

Ernst & Young Global 

/s/ Fernando Espinosa López 

C.P.C. Fernando Espinosa López 

Mexico City, Mexico 

June 26, 2006
#### § 90.357 Frequencies for LMS systems in the 902-928 MHz band.

(a) Multilateration LMS systems will be authorized on the following LMS sub-bands:

| LMS sub-band | Forward link1 |
| --- | --- |
| 904.000-909.750 MHz | 927.750-928.000 MHz. |
| 919.750-921.750 MHz.2 | 927.500-927.750 MHz. |
| 921.750-927.250 MHz | 927.250-927.500 MHz. |
| | |
| --- | --- |
| 1 Forward links for LMS systems may also be contained within the LMS sub-band. However, the maximum allowable power in these sub-bands is 30 Watts ERP in accordance with [§ 90.205(l)](/on/2024-09-20/title-47/section-90.205#p-90.205(l)). | |
| 2 The frequency band 919.750-921.750 MHz is shared co-equally between multilateration and non-multilateration LMS systems. | |

(b) Non-multilateriation LMS systems will be authorized in the following frequency bands:

| LMS Sub-band1 |
| --- |
| 902.000-904.000 MHz |
| 909.750-921.750 MHz |
| |
| --- |
| 1 Applicants for non-multilateration LMS systems should request only the minimum amount of bandwidth necessary to meet their operational needs. |

[[72 FR 35198](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/72-FR-35198), June 27, 2007, as amended at [75 FR 19284](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/75-FR-19284), Apr. 14, 2010]
#### § 303-70.800 Are receipts required for claims for reimbursement under this part?

Yes. Receipts are required for claims for reimbursement under this part.