alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 73.3556 Sponsorship identification; list retention; related requirements. ( a ) No commercial FM radio station shall operate so as to devote more than 25 percent of the total hours in its average broadcast week to programs that duplicate those of any station in the same service which is commonly owned or with which it has a time brokerage agreement if the principal community contours (predicted 3.16 mV/m) of the stations overlap and the overlap constitutes more than 50 percent of the total principal community contour service area of either station.
( b ) For purposes of this section, duplication means the broadcasting of identical programs within any 24-hour period.
[89 FR 55084, July 3, 2024]
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Celadon Group, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Stephen
Russell, Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.

                                              /s/ Stephen Russell
                                              -------------------
                                                Stephen Russell
                               Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

September 19, 2003
No. 11-1201.

#### Liotti *v.*United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 73.1206 Broadcast of telephone conversations.

Before recording a telephone conversation for broadcast, or broadcasting such a conversation simultaneously with its occurrence, a licensee shall inform any party to the call of the licensee's intention to broadcast the conversation, except where such party is aware, or may be presumed to be aware from the circumstances of the conversation, that it is being or likely will be broadcast. Such awareness is presumed to exist only when the other party to the call is associated with the station (such as as employee or part-time reporter), or where the other party originates the call and it is obvious that it is in connection with a program in which the station customarily broadcasts telephone conversations.

[35 FR 7733, May 20, 1970]
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas August 22, 2022 No. 04-22-00390-CV Brian GILL , Appellant

v. Gina GILL , Appellee From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020-CI-23530 Honorable Tina Torres, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R The district court signed a final judgment on May 26, 2022; the reporter’s record was due to be filed in this court by July 25, 2022. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 35.1. No reporter’s record has been filed. It appears that none has been requested. Contra id. R. 35.3(b)(2) Therefore, we order Appellant to provide written proof to this court within ten days of the date of this order that the reporter’s record has been requested and paid for or arrangements have been made to pay the reporter’s fee (unless Appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s fee). See id . R. 35.3(b)(2), (3). If Appellant fails to respond within the time provided, Appellant must file his brief with this court within thirty days of the date of this order, and the court will only “consider and decide those issues or points [raised in Appellant’s brief] that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision.” See T EX . R. A PP . P. 37.3(c). If Appellant timely complies with this order, the reporter’s record will be due fifteen days from the date Appellant files written proof showing compliance with this order.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 22nd day of August, 2022.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
****

***October 1999***

******Tips for Buying a Used Car**

The Attorney General's Consumer Protection Division receives hundreds of complaints every yearconcerning used car purchases.  Buying a used car can be tricky -- and expensive.

**Here are steps consumers can take to protect themselves:**

o Test drive the car under various conditions -- hills and highways, and stop-and-go traffic.

o Be sure to have it inspected by a mechanic of your choice.  Have the mechanic look for prior damageand test the engine, brakes, air conditioning, and other systems.

o Record the vehicle identification number (VIN), then contact the county treasurer, the Iowa DOT, or aprivate service to determine the history of the vehicle.

o Ask the seller for the name(s) of prior owners.  Contact them to find out why they sold the vehicle, whatproblems they had with it, and the mileage at the time they sold it.

o Get promises in writing!  It is difficult to prove that a promise was made unless you get it in writing.

o Shop around for the best financing terms.  Check with banks, credit unions, and other lenders as well as the dealer.  Focus on your total cost (including financing), not only on your monthly payment.

**Here are state and federal laws that protect used car buyers:**

o Damage Fraud:  Iowa's damage disclosure law requires car sellers to give you written notice if the carincurred damage of $5,000 or more while they owned the vehicle, and if the vehicle had ever been titledas salvage, flood or rebuilt.  Read all disclosures carefully, and ask to see the most recent title for thevehicle.  (The front of Iowa titles will show if prior cumulative damage was reported in Iowa, or if thevehicle had ever been titled as salvage, flood or rebuilt.)

o The FTC Used Car Rule:  The Used Car Rule requires dealers to post warranty information on the sidewindow of the car.  This will tell you whether there are warranties available or whether the car is sold "as-is" -- which means with NO warranties.

o NOTE:  There generally is NO three-day right to cancel a contract to purchase a car!

If you would like further information about buying used cars, please write to the Consumer ProtectionDivision, Hoover Building, Des Moines, Iowa  50319.  Call 515-281-5926.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1001/2005

of 30 June 2005         

fixing production refunds on cereals

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003, on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 8(2) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The refund per tonne of starch referred to in Article 3(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1722/93, is hereby fixed at:

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 July 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 June 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

(2)OJ L 159, 1.7.1993, p. 112. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1548/2004 (OJ L 280, 31.8.2004, p. 11).

----
# iCollege Decks the Halls for the Holidays

/ Published Dec. 4, 2014

Staff, students, and visitors to National Defense University's Marshall Hall

were met on Monday, December 1 with a with a two-story holiday display of

beautifully decorated trees, wreaths, and other ornaments.   

In addition to being the home of the NDU iCollege, Marshall Hall is the focal point

of NDU's holiday celebrations, culminating with the annual Holiday Fest each year, 

when the main hallway and atrium is filled with food, music, and plenty of holiday cheer.

Led by the iCollege, a small team of faculty and staff from across the university

completed the holiday display.  First to be erected was the giant Christmas tree in the 

Marshall Hall atrium.  Smaller trees representing the world's regions surround the 

main tree and are decorated with regional and ethnic ornaments placed by the

families of NDU's international students.  In addition, wreaths of various sizes adorn 

the main hallways and balcony landings on the second and third floors.  

Happy Holidays to all !!!
EXHIBIT 31.2



CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION



I, Kevin Arave, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Source Direct Holdings, Inc.



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                        |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: February 21, 2006 |  | /s/ Kevin Arave                      
|                        |  | Kevin Arave                          
|                        |  | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
No. 10-1489.

#### Mai-Trang Thi Nguyen *v.*Starbucks Coffee Corp.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


          In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  CytoGenix,   Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending  December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Randy
Moseley,  Principal  Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The  Annual  Report  of  CytoGenix,  Inc.  on form  10-K for the year  ended
December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information  contained in such Annual Report of CytoGenix,  Inc. on Form
10-K fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the financial  condition and
result of operations of the Company.

/s/Randy Moseley
----------------

RANDY MOSELEY
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
May 15, 2009
# Information Resources Management College Biographies

Information Resources Management College Biographies RSS Feed

- Ricardo A. Aguilera Ricardo A. Aguilera serves as Chief Financial Officer and Director of the Division of Financial
- Ms. Michele Markoff Michele Markoff is the inaugural Distinguished Scholar of the College of Information and Cyberspace
- COL Raul Rodriguez-Medellin COL Rodriguez serves as the Deputy Director of the Office of Academic Engagements in the US Cyber
Exhibit 99.1   Press Release






PRESS RELEASE
November 22, 2002                For further information contact:
                                 David M. Bradley
                                 Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
                                 North Central Bancshares, Inc.
                                 825 Central Avenue
                                 Fort Dodge, Iowa 50501
                                 515-576-7531

                NORTH CENTRAL BANCSHARES, INC. DECLARES DIVIDEND

David M. Bradley, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of North
Central Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") announced today that the Company
declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.18 per share on the Company's
common stock for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2002. The dividend will
be payable to all stockholders of record as of December 16, 2002 and will be
paid on January 7, 2003.

North Central Bancshares, Inc. serves north central and southeastern Iowa at 9
full service locations in Fort Dodge, Nevada, Ames, Burlington, Mount Pleasant,
Perry and Ankeny, Iowa through its wholly-owned subsidiary, First Federal
Savings Bank of Iowa, headquartered in Fort Dodge, Iowa. The Bank's deposits are
insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The Company's stock is
traded on The Nasdaq National Market under the symbol "FFFD".
**Exhibit99.1**

 

Interactive Intelligence, Inc.

 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interactive Intelligence,Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Dr. Donald E. Brown, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adoptedpursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The  information contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.

 

 
| /s/ Donald E. Brown                                           |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Donald E. Brown,                                              |
| Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive  Officer |
| August 13, 2002                                               |

 

----
No. 11-10148.

#### Cooper, aka Lockheed *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-5419.

#### Stenhouse *v.*Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the annual report of Staktek Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, W. Kirk Patterson, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.



Date: March 9, 2005



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/    W. Kirk Patterson                  
|W. Kirk Patterson                         
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4802 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4802

  To prohibit any charges on telephone bills for calls to 800 numbers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 20, 1994

  Mr. Gordon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit any charges on telephone bills for calls to 800 numbers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds the following:
            (1) Reforms required by the Telephone Disclosure and 
        Dispute Resolution Act of 1992 have improved the reputation of 
        the pay-per-call industry and resulted in regulations that have 
        reduced the incidence of misleading practices that are harmful 
        to the public interest.
            (2) Among the successful reforms is a prohibition on 
        charges being assessed for calls to 800 telephone numbers or 
        other telephone numbers advertised or widely understood to be 
        toll free.
            (3) Nevertheless, certain interstate pay-per-call 
        businesses are taking advantage of an exception in the 
        prohibition on charging for information conveyed during a call 
        to a ``toll-free'' number to continue to engage in misleading 
        practices. These practices are not in compliance with the 
        intent of Congress in passing the Telephone Disclosure and 
        Dispute Resolution Act.
            (4) Therefore, it is necessary for Congress to clarify that 
        its intent is that charges for information provided during a 
        call to an 800 number or other number widely advertised and 
        understood to be toll free shall not, under any circumstances, 
        be included or transmitted with a bill for telephone services.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO THE COMMUNICATIONS ACT OF 1934.

    (a) Amendment.--Section 228(c)(6)(C) of the Communications Act of 
1934 (47 U.S.C. 228(c)(6)(C)) is amended by inserting before the 
semicolon the following: ``, except that nothing in this paragraph 
shall permit the calling party to be charged for the information or the 
call by means of a charge included on, or transmitted with, a bill for 
telephone exchange service or telephone toll service''.
    (b) Regulations.--The Federal Communications Commission shall 
revise its regulations to comply with the amendment made by subsection 
(a) of this section within 30 days after the date of enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```