alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**


**THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b)**


**OF
      SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)**




Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of
      Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Gregory L.
      Cauthen, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Transocean Inc.,
      a
      Cayman Islands company (the “Company”), hereby certify, to my knowledge,
      that:





(1)
            the
                Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
                30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section
                13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            Information
                contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
                the
                financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





Date:
                November 8, 2005
            
            /s/
                Gregory L. CauthenName:
            Gregory
                L. CauthenSenior
                Vice President andChief
                Financial Officer





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
      63
      of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report
      or
      as a separate disclosure document.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Transocean Inc. and will be retained by Transocean Inc. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4756

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require the Secretary

of Health and Human Services to take into account the health of a

primary caregiver in determining whether an item of durable medical

equipment is considered medically necessary and appropriate under part

B of the medicare program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 14, 1994

Mr. BROWN of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly

to the Committees on Ways and Means and Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require

the Secretary of Health and Human Services to take

into account the health of a primary caregiver in determining whether an item of durable medical equipment

is considered medically necessary and appropriate under

part B of the medicare program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4756 IH

1 SECTION 1. CONSIDERATION OF EFFECT OF DENIAL OF

2 COVERAGE OF DURABLE MEDICAL EQUIP3 MENT ON HEALTH OF PRIMARY CAREGIVER

4 IN MEDICAL NECESSITY DETERMINATIONS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1834(a)(1) of the Social

6 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395m(a)(1)) is amended by add7 ing at the end the following new subparagraph:

8 ‘‘(E) CONSIDERATION OF NEEDS OF PRI9 MARY CAREGIVER IN MEDICAL NECESSITY DE10 TERMINATIONS.—

11 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—In determining

12 whether payment may be made under this

13 part for a covered item furnished to an in14 dividual living with a primary caregiver

15 who assists the individual without mone16 tary compensation in the performance of

17 any of the activities of daily living de18 scribed in clause (ii), the Secretary shall

19 consider the effect of a denial of payment

20 on the health of the primary caregiver in

21 the determination of whether the item is

22 reasonable and necessary for the diagnosis

23 or treatment of illness or injury or to im24 prove the functioning of a malformed body

25 member with respect to the individual.
3

•HR 4756 IH

1 ‘‘(ii) ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING DE2 SCRIBED.—The ‘activities of daily living’

3 referred to in clause (i) are as follows:

4 ‘‘(I) Eating.

5 ‘‘(II) Bathing.

6 ‘‘(III) Dressing.

7 ‘‘(IV) Toileting.

8 ‘‘(V) Transferring in and out of

9 a bed or in and out of a chair.’’.

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

11 subsection (a) shall apply to items furnished on or after

12 January 1, 1995.

Æ
§ 73.3540 Application for voluntary assignment or transfer of control. ( a ) Prior consent of the FCC must be obtained for a voluntary assignment or transfer of control.
( b ) Application should be filed with the FCC at least 45 days prior to the contemplated effective date of assignment or transfer of control.
( c ) Application for consent to the assignment of construction permit or license must be filed on FCC Form 2100 Schedule 314 “Assignment of License or Construction Permit” or FCC Form 2100 Schedule 316 (See paragraph (f) of this section). For International Broadcast Stations, the application shall be filed electronically in the International Communications Filing System (ICFS).
( d ) Application for consent to the transfer of control of an entity holding a construction permit or license must be filed on FCC Form 2100 Schedule 315 “Transfer of Control” or FCC Form 2100 Schedule 316 (see paragraph (f) of this section). For International Broadcast Stations, applications shall be filed electronically in ICFS.
( e ) Application for consent to the assignment of construction permit or license or to the transfer of control of an entity licensee or permittee for an FM or TV translator station, a low power TV station and any associated auxiliary station, such as translator microwave relay stations and UHF translator booster stations, only must be filed on FCC Form 2100 Schedule 345 “Application for Consent to Assign Construction Permit or License for TV or FM Translator or Low Power TV Station or to Transfer Control of Entity Holding TV or FM Translator, or a Low Power TV Station.”
( f ) The following assignment or transfer applications may be filed on FCC Form 2100 Schedule 316: ( 1 ) Assignment from an individual or individuals (including partnerships) to a corporation owned and controlled by such individuals or partnerships without any substantial change in their relative interests;
( 2 ) Assignment from a corporation to its individual stockholders without effecting any substantial change in the disposition of their interests;
( 3 ) Assignment or transfer by which certain stockholders retire and the interest transferred is not a controlling one;
( 4 ) Corporate reorganization which involves no substantial change in the beneficial ownership of the corporation;
( 5 ) Assignment or transfer from a corporation to a wholly owned subsidiary thereof or vice versa, or where there is an assignment from a corporation to a corporation owned or controlled by the assignor stockholders without substantial change in their interests; or
( 6 ) Assignment of less than a controlling interest in a partnership.
[44 FR 38496, July 2, 1979, as amended at 48 FR 21486, May 12, 1983; 49 FR 47843, Dec. 7, 1984; 50 FR 32416, Aug. 12, 1985; 86 FR 54402, Oct. 1, 2021; 88 FR 21448, Apr. 10, 2023; 89 FR 7259, Feb. 1, 2024]
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

PETER HELIE, TIMOTHY HAVILAND, NED LIPES, PHIL LITOWITZ,

and GREG SMITH, each individually and in a derivative capacity as 

shareholders of and on behalf of Old Palm Golf Club, Inc.,

a Florida not-for-profit corporation, 

Appellants,

v.

OLD PALM HOLDINGS L.P., a Delaware Limited Partnership, 

CDVII OLD PALM LLC, a Delaware Limited Partnership,

CLARION DEVELOPMENT VENTURES, III L.P., a Delaware Limited 

Partnership, CLARION DEVELOPMENT III, LLC, a Delaware Limited 

Partnership, CLARION PARTNERS LLC, a New York Limited 

Partnership, TRITON ATLANTIC PARTNERS, LLC, a Delaware Limited 

Partnership, JAMES D. MOTTA, GARY WALKER, LESLIE SNAVELY,

and 

OLD PALM GOLF CLUB, INC.

Appellees.

No. 4D17-2317

[February 8, 2018]

Appeal of non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth 

Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Richard L. Oftedal, Judge; L.T. Case 

No. 502017CA003131XXXXMB.

Gary M. Dunkel and Seth B. Burack of Fox Rothschild LLP, West Palm 

Beach, for appellants.

Jaime A. Bianchi, David P. Draigh and Zachary B. Dickens of White & 

Case LLP, Miami, for appellees Old Palm Holdings, L.P., CDVIII Old Palm, 

LLC, Clarion Development Ventures III, L.P., Clarion Development III, LLC, 

and Clarion Partners, LLC.

Kathryn L. Ender of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Miami, for appellees 

Triton Atlantic Partners, LLC, James D. Motta, Gary Walker and Leslie 

Snavely.

Nathan E. Nason of Nason, Yeager, Gerson, White & Lioce, P.A., Palm 

Beach Gardens, for appellee Old Palm Golf Club, Inc. 
2

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, TAYLOR and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### § 76.1203 Incidence of harm.

A multichannel video programming distributor may restrict the attachment or use of navigation devices with its system in those circumstances where electronic or physical harm would be caused by the attachment or operation of such devices or such devices that assist or are intended or designed to assist in the unauthorized receipt of service. Such restrictions may be accomplished by publishing and providing to subscribers standards and descriptions of devices that may not be used with or attached to its system. Such standards shall foreclose the attachment or use only of such devices as raise reasonable and legitimate concerns of electronic or physical harm or theft of service. In any situation where theft of service or harm occurs or is likely to occur, service may be discontinued.
§ 76.614 Cable television system regular monitoring. Cable television operators transmitting carriers in the frequency bands 108-137 and 225-400 MHz shall provide for a program of regular monitoring for signal leakage by substantially covering the plant every three months. The incorporation of this monitoring program into the daily activities of existing service personnel in the discharge of their normal duties will generally cover all portions of the system and will therefore meet this requirement. Monitoring equipment and procedures utilized by a cable operator shall be adequate to detect a leakage source which produces a field strength in these bands of 20 uV/m or greater at a distance of 3 meters. During regular monitoring, any leakage source which produces a field strength of 20 uV/m or greater at a distance of 3 meters in the aeronautical radio frequency bands shall be noted and such leakage sources shall be repaired within a reasonable period of time. Note 1 to § 76.614 :
Section 76.1706 contains signal leakage recordkeeping requirements applicable to cable operators.
[65 FR 53616, Sept. 5, 2000]
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Frank P. Reilly, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of NuState Energy Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of NuState Energy Holdings, Inc.

                                     NuSTATE ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC.

                                     /s/ Frank P. Reilly
                                     -------------------
                                     Frank P. Reilly
                                     Chief Executive Officer and
                                     Principal Financial and Accounting Officer

February 19, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 54.1901 Neutrality requirement.

Outreach conducted by Grantees, Pass-through Entities, and Subrecipients, as defined in 2 CFR part 200, through the Commission's Affordable Connectivity Outreach Grant Program shall be neutral with respect to a particular participating provider (as defined in § 54.1800(r)(1) through (4)) or among a specific group of participating providers (including, but not limited to, broadband industry groups, such as trade associations).
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________ NO

. 09

- 1 8

- 00 453

- C R NO. 09

- 1 8

- 00 454

- C R NO. 09

- 1 8

- 00 455

- C R



### ____________________
RONALD EDWIN DUNCAN , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________ On A ppeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No s . 18

- 330373, 18

- 330374, and 18

- 330375

________________________________________________________ _____________ MEMORANDUM OPINION

The trial court sentenced Ronald Edwin Duncan on October 15, 2018. The
notices of appeal were due to be filed on November 14 , 2018. See Tex. R. App. P.
26.2(a)(1). A notice of appeal was not filed until November 21, 2018 , and Duncan
did not timely file a motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal. See

Tex. R. App. P. 26.3.2 On Decem ber 1 0 , 2018, we notified the parties that the appeals had not been
timely perfected and that the appeals wou ld be dismissed unless a written response

is filed in this C ourt showing cause why the s e appeal s should not be dismissed for
lack of jurisdiction. Duncan filed a response but failed to demonstrate that our
appellate jurisdiction was invoked within the time permitted for perfecting the
appeals.

A timely notice of appeal is neces sary to invoke appellate jurisdiction

. See

Slaton v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208, 209 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State , 918
S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996)

. “ When a notice of appeal, but no motion

for extension of time, is filed within the 15

- day period, the court of appeals can take
no action other than to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. ” Aleman v. State
, 554 S.W.3d 794, 795 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 2018, n o pet.). We dismiss
the appeals for lack of jurisdiction.

APPEALS DISMISS ED.

________________________________ LEANNE JOHNSON Justice

Submitted on January 29
, 201 9 Opinion Delivered January 30
, 2019 Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
No. 11-5604.

#### Joines *v.*Davis, Warden.

Super. Ct. Dooly County, Ga. Certiorari denied.
§ 80.271 Technical requirements for portable survival craft radiotelephone transceivers. ( a ) Portable survival craft radiotelephone transceivers must comply with the following: ( 1 ) The transceivers must receive and transmit either on 457.525 MHz or on 156.800 MHz;
( 2 ) The receiver must comply with the requirements in part 15, subpart B of this chapter and must have a sensitivity of not more than 2 microvolts;
( 3 ) The effective radiated power of the transmitter must be at least 0.1 watt;
( 4 ) The transceivers must be battery powered and operate for at least four hours with a transmit to receive ratio of 1:9 with no significant adverse effect upon the performance of the device;
( 5 ) The transceivers must have a permanently attached waterproof label with the statement “Complies with the FCC requirements for survival craft two-way radiotelephone equipment”; and
( 6 ) The antenna must be permanently attached to the device or its removal must require the use of a special tool.
( b ) Portable radiotelephone transceivers that are already certificated may be used to satisfy the survival craft radiotelephone requirement until October 1, 1993, provided the device meets the technical requirements in paragraphs (a) (1) through (3) of this section.
( c ) Survival craft radiotelephone equipment installed after October 1, 1988, must be certificated to meet the requirements of this section.
( d ) After October 1, 1993, all portable radiotelephone transceivers that are used to satisfy the survival craft radiotelephone requirement must have been certificated to meet the requirements of this section.
( e ) Portable radiotelephone transceivers which are certified to meet the requirements of this section must be identified by an appropriate note in the Commission's database.
[51 FR 31213, Sept. 2, 1986, as amended at 63 FR 36607, July 7, 1998; 73 FR 4483, Jan. 25, 2008; 76 FR 67612, Nov. 2, 2011]
No. 11-10046.

#### Fleck *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
#### § 80.145 [Reserved]
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: ____2013______-NM-____232______-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
No. 11-667.

#### Beeler, as Parent and Natural Guardian of Her Minor Child *v.*Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
#### § 42.6 Retention of telephone toll records.

Each carrier that offers or bills toll telephone service shall retain for a period of 18 months such records as are necessary to provide the following billing information about telephone toll calls: the name, address, and telephone number of the caller, telephone number called, date, time and length of the call. Each carrier shall retain this information for toll calls that it bills whether it is billing its own toll service customers for toll calls or billing customers for another carrier.

[51 FR 39536, Oct. 29, 1986]
No. 11-9663.

#### Haggard *v.*Curry, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-5857.

#### Bethea *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             199
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,143
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     57,430
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                74,441
<PP&E>                                          46,678
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 132,312
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,624
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           37,526
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      (44,794)
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   132,312
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               303,163
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  189,106
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,536
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,534)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,821)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,713)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,713)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### § 78.17 Amendment of applications.

Any application may be amended as a matter of right prior to the adoption date of any final action taken by the Commission with respect to the application. If a petition to deny has been filed, the amendment shall be served on the petitioner.

[68 FR 27004, May 19, 2003]
IIA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4543

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 9 (legislative day, AUGUST 8), 1994

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse to be constructed

at 907 Richland Street in Columbia, South Carolina,

as the ‘‘Matthew J. Perry, Jr. United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The United States courthouse to be constructed at

5 907 Richland Street in Columbia, South Carolina, shall

6 be known and designated as the ‘‘Matthew J. Perry, Jr.

7 United States Courthouse’’.
2

•HR 4543 RFS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

4 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

5 to be a reference to the ‘‘Matthew J. Perry, Jr. United

6 States Courthouse’’.

Passed the House of Representatives August 8,

1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
**Exhibit 21****List of Subsidiaries**The following sets forth the subsidiaries of the Registrant and their respective states ofincorporation or organization:   **Name** **State**American Office Park Properties, TPGP, Inc. CaliforniaPSBP QRS, Inc. CaliforniaHernmore, Inc. MarylandAOPP Acquisition Corp. Two CaliforniaTenant Advantage, Inc. CaliforniaPS Business Parks, L.P. CaliforniaPSBP Northpointe D, L.L.C. VirginiaPSBP Monroe, L.L.C. VirginiaMonroe Parkway, L.L.C. VirginiaMetro Park I, L.L.C. DelawareMetro Park II, L.L.C. DelawareMetro Park III, L.L.C. DelawareMetro Park IV, L.L.C. DelawareMetro Park V, L.L.C. DelawareMetro Park Gude, L.L.C. DelawarePSBP Westwood GP, L.L.C. DelawarePSBP Westwood, L.P. DelawarePSBP Industrial, L.L.C. DelawareMiami International Commerce Center FloridaREVX-098, L.L.C. DelawarePS Rose Canyon, L.L.C. DelawarePSBP Meadows L.L.C. DelawarePSB Boca Commerce Park, L.L.C. FloridaPSB Wellington Commerce Park I, L.L.C. FloridaPSB Wellington Commerce Park II, L.L.C. FloridaPSB Wellington Commerce Park III, L.L.C. Florida