alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 24.712 Bidding credits for licenses won for frequency Block C. ( a ) Except with respect to licenses won in closed bidding in auctions that begin after March 23, 1999, a winning bidder that qualifies as a small business, as defined in § 24.720(b)(1), or a consortium of small businesses may use a bidding credit of fifteen percent, as specified in § 1.2110(f)(2)(iii) of this chapter, to lower the cost of its winning bid.
( b ) Except with respect to licenses won in closed bidding in auctions that begin after March 23, 1999, a winning bidder that qualifies as a very small business, as defined in § 24.720(b)(2), or a consortium of very small businesses may use a bidding credit of twenty-five percent as specified in § 1.2110(f)(2)(ii) of this chapter, to lower the cost of its winning bid.
( c ) *Unjust enrichment.* The unjust enrichment provisions of § 1.2111(d) and (e)(2) of this chapter shall not apply with respect to licenses acquired in either the auction for frequency block C that began on December 18, 1995, or the reauction of block C spectrum that began on July 3, 1996.
[67 FR 45371, July 9, 2002, as amended at 68 FR 42999, July 21, 2003]
/* global a2a*/
(function (Drupal) {
  'use strict';

  Drupal.behaviors.addToAny = {
    attach: function (context, settings) {
      // If not the full document (it's probably AJAX), and window.a2a exists
      if (context !== document && window.a2a) {
        a2a.init_all(); // Init all uninitiated AddToAny instances
      }
    }
  };

})(Drupal);
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0795Community-Oriented Trust and Justice Briefs: Procedural JusticeThe COPS Office and the National Initiative for Building Community Trust and Justice have provided overview briefs on topics important to building community safety by improving police legitimacy. Procedural Justice focuses on the way police and other authorities interact with the public and how those interactions can shape the public view of police.By National Initiative for Building Community Trust and JusticeCategories: Foundations of Community PolicingLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0795Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Feb 2016Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 02:34 (UTC-5) in 0.19 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

DONNA GRANT, §

 § No. 245, 2021

Petitioner Below, §

Appellant, § Court Below—Family Court

 § of the State of Delaware

v. §

 § File No: CN20-02581

AARON KELLY, Administrator § Petition No. 20-10923

of the Estate of Richard T. Carter, §

 §

Respondent Below, §

Appellee. §

Submitted: May 11, 2022

Decided: May 12, 2022

Before VALIHURA, VAUGHN, and TRAYNOR, Justices.

ORDER

This 12th day of May, 2022, after consideration of the parties’ briefs and the 

record on appeal, it appears that:

(1) When Donna Grant filed her Petition for Paternity Adjudication in the 

Family Court (the “Delaware Paternity Action”), a probate proceeding was pending 

in the North Carolina General Court of Justice, Superior Court Division. In that 

proceeding, which was captioned In the Matter of the Estate of [Richard Carter], 

Case No. 19 E 907, Grant alleged that she was the decedent’s daughter and thus was 

“an interested person”1in the proceeding.

1 This Court assigned pseudonyms to all parties under Supreme Court Rule 7(d).
(2) The Delaware Paternity Action appears to have been designed to muster 

proof of the allegation she made in the North Carolina probate proceeding that Carter 

was Grant’s father.

(3) Aaron Kelly, who is the administrator of Carter’s estate in North 

Carolina, is a resident of North Carolina. When she filed the Delaware Paternity 

Action, Grant was a resident of Massachusetts. Carter’s other intestate heirs live in 

Texas and California, respectively.

(4) Kelly moved to dismiss the Delaware Paternity Action in deference to 

the first-filed and then “pending estate proceedings in North Carolina,”2 noting that 

“the issues between the parties are substantially interrelated and can be determined 

in North Carolina.” The Family Court granted Kelly’s motion.

(5) Based upon our review of the record and the parties’ briefs, we are 

satisfied that the Family Court correctly applied the first-filed rule as outlined in 

McWane Cast Iron Pipe Corp. v. McDowell-Wellman Engineering Co.3and did not 

abuse its discretion when it dismissed the Delaware Paternity Action.

2 App. to Opening Br. at A93.

3

263 A.2d 281 (Del. 1970).
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Family 

Court is AFFIRMED. 

BY THE COURT: 

/s/ Gary F. Traynor

Justice
§ 80.1111 Distress alerting. ( a ) The transmission of a distress alert indicates that a mobile unit or person is in distress and requires immediate assistance. The distress alert is a digital selective call using a distress call format in bands used for terrestrial radiocommunication or a distress message format, which is relayed through space stations.
( b ) The distress alert must be sent through a satellite either with absolute priority in general communication channels or on exclusive distress and safety frequencies or, alternatively, on the distress and safety frequencies in the MF, HF, and VHF bands using digital selective calling.
( c ) The distress alert must be sent only on the authority of the person responsible for the ship, aircraft or other vehicle carrying the mobile station or the mobile earth station.
( d ) All stations which receive a distress alert transmitted by digital selective calling must immediately cease any transmission capable of interfering with distress traffic and must continue watch on the digital selective call distress calling channel until the call has been acknowledged to determine if a coast station acknowledges the call using digital selective calling. Additionally, the station receiving the distress alert must set watch on the associated distress traffic frequency for five minutes to determine if distress traffic takes place. The ship can acknowledge the call using voice or narrowband direct printing as appropriate on this channel to the ship or to the rescue authority.
[57 FR 9065, Mar. 16, 1992, as amended at 68 FR 46980, Aug. 7, 2003]
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 49

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit losses on sales

of certain prior principal residences to offset gain on a subsequent

sale of a principal residence.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. ARCHER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit

losses on sales of certain prior principal residences to

offset gain on a subsequent sale of a principal residence.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Home Sale Tax Fair5 ness Act of 1993’’.

6 SEC. 2. LOSSES ALLOWED AGAINST GAIN RECOGNIZED ON

7 SALE OF PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE.

8 Section 1001 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986

9 (relating to determination of amount of and recognition
2

HR 49 IH

1 of gain or loss) is amended by redesignating subsection

2 (f) as subsection (g) and by inserting after subsection (e)

3 the following new subsection:

4 ‘‘(f) LOSSES ALLOWED AGAINST GAIN RECOGNIZED

5 ON SALE OF PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE.—In the case of an

6 individual, the amount of gain which would (but for this

7 subsection) be recognized on the sale or exchange after

8 December 31, 1993, of a principal residence of such indi9 vidual shall be reduced (but not below zero) by the aggre10 gate of the losses (if any) sustained by such individual on

11 the sale or exchange after the date of the enactment of

12 this subsection of prior principal residences of such indi13 vidual which were not allowed as a deduction and which

14 were not previously taken into account under this sub15 section. For purposes of the preceding sentence, the term

16 ‘principal residence’ has the same meaning as when used

17 in section 1034.’’

Æ
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4989

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located

at 100 Northeast Monroe Street in Peoria, Illinois, as the ‘‘Robert

H. Michel Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 18, 1994

Mr. TRAFICANT (for himself, Mr. MINETA, Mr. SHUSTER, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr.

HYDE, Mr. HASTERT, and Mr. GINGRICH) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Public Works and Transportation

A BILL

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 100 Northeast Monroe Street in Peoria,

Illinois, as the ‘‘Robert H. Michel Federal Building and

United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Federal building and United States courthouse

5 located at 100 Northeast Monroe Street in Peoria, Illinois,

6 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Robert H. Michel

7 Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.
2

•HR 4989 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

4 building and United States courthouse referred to in sec5 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Robert

6 H. Michel Federal Building and United States Court7 house’’.

Æ
No. 11-9232.

#### Riggs *v.*Illinois.

App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Cer-tiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Vasan Thatham, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of NetFabric Holdings,
Inc. (the" Company").

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d 15(e) for the Company and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) [Reserved]

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal
quarter (the Company's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Company's auditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting.

November 20, 2006


                                        /s/ Vasan Thatham
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name: Vasan Thatham
                                        Title: Chief Financial Officer
§ 95.1723 GMRS station inspection. If an authorized FCC representative requests to inspect a GMRS station, the operator must make the station and any station records available for inspection. ( a ) A GMRS station includes all of the equipment used in connection with that station.
( b ) Station records include the following documents, as applicable: ( 1 ) A copy of each response to an FCC violation notice or an FCC letter.
( 2 ) Each written permission received from the FCC.
( 3 ) Any written agreement regarding sharing arrangements pursuant to § 95.1705(f)(4) of this part.
- [Untitled]
- AZ 1979 final page correction
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4948 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 238

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4948

                          [Report No. 103-823]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To designate Building Number 137 of the Tuscaloosa Veterans' Medical 
 Center in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, as the ``Claude Harris, Jr. Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 3, 1994

 Reported and referred to the House Calendar, and ordered to be printed

                                                 House Calendar No. 238
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4948

                          [Report No. 103-823]

 To designate Building Number 137 of the Tuscaloosa Veterans' Medical 
 Center in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, as the ``Claude Harris, Jr. Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 12, 1994

   Mr. Bachus of Alabama (for himself, Mr. Bevill, Mr. Browder, Mr. 
 Callahan, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Everett, Mr. Hilliard, Mr. Montgomery, Mr. 
   Rowland, and Mr. Hutto) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

                            October 3, 1994

                     Additional sponsor: Mr. Stump

                            October 3, 1994

 Reported and referred to the House Calendar, and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate Building Number 137 of the Tuscaloosa Veterans' Medical 
 Center in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, as the ``Claude Harris, Jr. Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    Building Number 137 of the Tuscaloosa Veterans' Medical Center in 
Tuscaloosa, Alabama, shall be known and designated as the ``Claude 
Harris, Jr. Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Claude Harris, Jr. 
Building''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32

             CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                   AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of DataLogic
International, Inc (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31,
2005 (the "Report"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity
as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.

Date:  May 23, 2005                      By: /s/ Keith Moore
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Keith Moore
                                         Chief Executive Officer,
                                         Chief Operating Officer and
                                         Director
                                         (Principal Executive Officer)

Date:  May 23, 2005                      By: /s/ Khanh Nguyen
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Khanh Nguyen
                                         President, Chief Financial Officer
                                         and Director
                                         (Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32  Certification by Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  We,
Mark W. DeYoung, Chief Executive Officer, and John L. Shroyer, Chief Financial
Officer, of Alliant Techsystems Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:  (1)the Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
expressed in the Report.  Dated:   May 18, 2010  By:
  /s/
  Mark W. DeYoungName:
  Mark
  W. DeYoungTitle:
  President and Chief Executive OfficerBy:
  /s/
  John L. ShroyerName:
  John
  L. ShroyerTitle:
  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4874 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4874

To amend the White House Conference on Small Business Authorization Act 
to require the final report of the National Conference to be published 
in the Federal Register and distributed through the regional offices of 
                   the Small Business Administration.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 1, 1994

  Mr. McHale introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the White House Conference on Small Business Authorization Act 
to require the final report of the National Conference to be published 
in the Federal Register and distributed through the regional offices of 
                   the Small Business Administration.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINAL REPORT OF NATIONAL WHITE HOUSE CONFERENCE ON SMALL 
              BUSINESS.

    Section 7(a) of the White House Conference on Small Business 
Authorization Act (15 U.S.C. 631 note) is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence by inserting ``and published in 
        the Federal Register'' before the period at the end; and
            (2) in the third sentence by inserting ``and distributed 
        through the regional offices of the Small Business 
        Administration'' before the period at the end.
                                 <all>
```