alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.11


FOURTH
AMENDMENT


This Fourth Amendment, effective as of the date set forth above the
signatures of the parties below, pertains to the Exclusive Patent License
Agreement (“Agreement 4909826”), effective on October 31, 2002, as subsequently
amended by a First Amendment on November 15, 2002, a Second Amendment on July
17, 2004, and a Third Amendment on August 5, 2006, by and between the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (“M.I.T.”) and Momenta Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. (“COMPANY”).


WHEREAS, COMPANY no longer plans to commercialize the technology
included in MIT Case Number 9085, “Aerosol Administration of Heparin to the
Lungs,” by Dongfang Liu, Yiwei Qi, Ram Sasisekharan, Mallikarjun Sundaram and
Ganesh Venkataraman;


WHEREAS, M.I.T. agrees to remove this case from Agreement 4909826
without penalty to COMPANY;


NOW, THEREFORE, M.I.T. and COMPANY hereby agree to remove this case and
all future obligations relating to this case from Agreement 4909826.


All
other terms and conditions of Agreement 4909826 shall remain unchanged.


The
AMENDMENT EFFECTIVE DATE is January 10, 2007.


Agreed to for:


	
  MASSACHUSETTS INTITUTE OF

  	
   

  	
  MOMENTA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

  	
   

  
	
  TECHNOLOGY

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By

  	
  /s/ Lita Nelsen

  	
   

  	
  By

  	
  /s/ Susan K. Whoriskey

  	
   

  
	
  Name

  	
  Lita L. Nelsen,

  	
   

  	
  Name

  	
  Susan K. Whoriskey, Ph.D.

  	
   

  
	
  Title

  	
  Director, Technology Licensing Office

  	
   

  	
  Title

  	
  Vice President, Licensing & Business

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Development
<PAGE>   1
                                                             EXHIBIT 23.2



                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of 
our report on Technology Company Ventures, L.L.C. dated October 14, 1997 
included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A-2 for the year ended December 31, 
1997 into Engineering Animation, Inc.'s previously filed Registration Statement 
File Nos. 333-17393, 333-40823, 333-40825, 333-57231, 333-64429 and 333-68159 
on Form S-8.

                                                  ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Portland, Oregon,
     February 26, 1999
Exhibit 99.1

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 contains forward-looking statements,
which are statements about matters that are not historical or current facts. In addition, our management may from time to time make forward-looking statements orally to analysts, investors, the news
media and others. Forward-looking statements often include words such as "expects," "anticipates," "intends," "plans," "believes," "seeks," "estimates," "will," "would," "should," "could," "may" or
similar words. Among the forward-looking statements in this report are statements relating to:



---





---





---





---





Forward-looking
statements reflect our management's beliefs, expectations or predictions of future conditions, events or results based on various assumptions, information currently
available to our management and management's estimates of trends and economic factors in the markets in which we are active, as well as our business plans. They are not guarantees of future
performance. By their nature, forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties. Our actual results and financial condition may differ, possibly materially, from the anticipated
results and financial condition indicated in these forward-looking statements. There are a number of factors that could cause actual conditions, events or results to differ materially from those
described in the forward-looking statements contained in this report. A discussion of certain factors that could cause actual conditions, events or results to differ materially from those expressed in
any forward-looking statements appears in "Part I, Item 1ARisk Factors."

Readers
are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements in this report or that we make from time to time, and to consider carefully the factors discussed in
"Part I, Item 1ARisk Factors" in evaluating these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are representative only as of the date they are made, and we
undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

---



QuickLinks
Editorial Note on Part 74
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 74 appear at 64 FR 4055, Jan. 27, 1999.

§ 74.702 Channel assignments. ( a ) An applicant for a new low power TV or TV translator station or for changes in the facilities of an authorized station shall endeavor to select a channel on which its operation is not likely to cause interference. The applications must be specific with regard to the channel requested. Only one channel will be assigned to each station. ( 1 ) Any one of the 12 standard VHF Channels (2 to 13 inclusive) may be assigned to a low power TV or TV translator station.
( 2 ) Any one of the UHF Channels from 14 to 36, inclusive, may be assigned to a low power TV or TV translator station. In accordance with § 73.603(c) of this chapter, Channel 37 will not be assigned to such stations.
( b ) Changes in the Table of TV Allotments (§ 73.622(j) of this chapter), authorizations to construct new full power television stations or to authorizations to change facilities of existing such stations, may be made without regard to existing or proposed low power TV or TV translator stations. Where such a change results in a low power TV or TV translator station causing actual interference to reception of the full power television station, the licensee or permittee of the low power TV or TV translator station shall eliminate the interference or file an application for a change in channel assignment pursuant to § 73.3572 of this chapter.
( c ) [Reserved]
[47 FR 21497, May 18, 1982, as amended at 47 FR 30068, July 12, 1982; 47 FR 35590, Aug. 18, 1982; 52 FR 7423, Mar. 11, 1987; 52 FR 31403, Aug. 20, 1987; 62 FR 26721, May 14, 1997; 86 FR 66214, Nov. 22, 2021; 87 FR 15344, Mar. 24, 2022; 87 FR 58202, Sept. 23, 2022; 88 FR 30667, May 12, 2023]
Order entered December 3, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-10-01544-CV

AMERISOUTH V, L.P., Appellant

V.

WELLS FARGO BANK N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR THE REGISTERED HOLDERS OF 

CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP., ET AL,

Appellees

On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 10-06408

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On January 31, 2011, the appeal was abated due to the filing of bankruptcy by appellant 

Amerisouth V, L.P. In response to our inquiry about the status of the bankruptcy proceeding, 

appellees filed a letter stating that the bankruptcy court has confirmed an amended plan of 

reorganization and closed the bankruptcy. Appellees attached a copy of the bankruptcy court’s 

order to its letter. Appellees also assert that they believe the appeal is moot. Appellant has not 

responded to appellees’ letter.
At the time the appeal was abated, neither the clerk’s nor the reporter’s record had been 

filed. However, appellant’s unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal was pending, which could 

not be disposed of due to the bankruptcy filing.

Accordingly, now that the bankruptcy proceeding is closed, the Court will dispose of 

appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal in due course.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Economics and Statistics Administration

# SUMMARY:

Below is a listing of individuals who are eligible to serve on the Performance Review Board in accordance with the Economics and Statistics Administration's Senior Executive Service and Senior Professional Performance Management Systems:

Herman Habermann, Shirin A. Ahmed, Teresa Angueira, William G. Bostic, Jr., Stephanie Brown, Howard Hogan, Nancy M. Gordon, Arnold A. Jackson, Theodore A. Johnson, Ruth Ann Killion, Robert LaMacchia, Michael J. Longini, Thomas L. Mesenbourg, Jr;

C. Harvey Monk, Andrew H. Moxam, Walter C. Odom, Jr., Marvin D. Raines, Brian Monaghan, Richard W. Swartz, Alan R. Tupek, Preston J. Waite, Mark E. Wallace, Daniel H. Weinberg, Ewen M. Wilson;

Tommy Wright, Robert Fay III, William Bell, Elizabeth Martin, Paul Friday, David Findley, J. Steven Landefeld, Dennis J. Fixler, Ralph H. Kozlow, Alan C. Lorish, Rosemary D. Marcuss, Brent R. Moulton;

Sumiye O. Okubo, John W. Ruser, James K. White, Katherine Wallman, and Dr. Jennifer Madans.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

John Cunningham, 301-763-3727.

Dated: August 16, 2006.

James K. White,

Associate Under Secretary for Management, Chair, Performance Review Board.

[FR Doc. 06-7087 Filed 8-22-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-BS-M
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350


In connection with the Annual Report of ION Geophysical Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, R. Brian Hanson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:


|   |                                                                                                                                      
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: February 9, 2018/s/ R. Brian HansonR. Brian HansonPresident and Chief Executive Officer
No. 11-9584.

#### Gutierrez *v.*McDonald, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 80.1115 Transmission of a distress alert by a station not itself in distress. ( a ) A station in the mobile or mobile-satellite service which learns that a mobile unit is in distress must initiate and transmit a distress alert relay in any of the following cases: ( 1 ) When the mobile unit in distress is not itself in a position to transmit the distress alert; or
( 2 ) When the master or person responsible for the mobile unit not in distress or the person responsible for the land station determines that further help is necessary.
( b ) A station transmitting a distress alert relay in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section or § 80.1121(c) must indicate that it is not itself in distress.
<Page>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.17

                               EXTENSION AGREEMENT

     This Extension Agreement (this "AGREEMENT") is dated as of March 14, 2007,
by and between (i) Tailwind Financial Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"MAKER"); and (ii) Parkwood Holdings Ltd. (the "LENDER").


                              W I T N E S S E T H:


     WHEREAS, reference is hereby made to each of the following documents:

     a.   that certain Promissory Note, dated July 31, 2006, issued by the Maker
          to the Lender in the principal amount of $68,750 (the "JULY NOTE");

     b.   that certain Promissory Note, dated February 2, 2007, issued by the
          Maker to the Lender in the principal amount of $300,000 (the "FEBRUARY
          NOTE" together with the July Note, the "Notes"); and

     WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend each of the Notes on the terms
set forth herein.

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises contained herein, and for
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

     1. AMENDMENTS TO THE NOTES. Each of the Notes are hereby amended by
deleting the reference to the date "March 31, 2007" in Paragraph 1 thereof and
replacing such reference with the date "August 31, 2007."

     2. FULL FORCE AND EFFECT. Except as amended hereby, each of the Notes shall
remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.

     3. MISCELLANEOUS. This Agreement may be executed in one or more original or
facsimile counterparts, each one of which shall constitute an original, and
together shall constitute but one instrument. This Agreement shall be governed
by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware
(without reference to conflict of laws).

               [remainder of page intentionally left blank]
<Page>

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have duly executed this Agreement as a
sealed instrument as of the date first set forth above.

                                        TAILWIND FINANCIAL INC.


                                        By:    /s/ Andrew A. McKay
                                               -------------------
                                               Name:  Andrew A. McKay
                                               Title: Chief Executive Officer


                                        PARKWOOD HOLDINGS LTD.


                                        By:    /s/ Andrew A. McKay
                                               -------------------
                                               Name:  Andrew A. McKay
                                               Title: Chief Executive Officer
§ 68.2 Scope. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, and excluding subpart F, which applies only to ACS telephonic CPE, the rules and regulations of this part apply to direct connection of all terminal equipment to the public switched telephone network for use in conjunction with all services other than party line services. Sections 68.4, 68.5, 68.6, 68.112, 68.160, 68.162, 68.316, and 68.317, and other sections to the extent they are made applicable by subpart F of this part, also apply to ACS and ACS telephonic CPE that is manufactured in the United States or imported for use in the United States on or after February 28, 2020.
( b ) *National defense and security.* Where the Secretary of Defense or authorized agent or the head of any other governmental department, agency, or administration (approved in writing by the Commission to act pursuant to this rule) or authorized representative, certifies in writing to the appropriate common carrier that compliance with the provisions of part 68 could result in the disclosure of communications equipment or security devices, locations, uses, personnel, or activity which would adversely affect the national defense and security, such equipment or security devices may be connected to the telephone company provided communications network without compliance with this part, provided that each written certification states that: ( 1 ) The connection is required in the interest of national defense and security;
( 2 ) The equipment or device to be connected either complies with the technical criteria pertaining thereto or will not cause harm to the nationwide telephone network or to employees of any provider of wireline telecommunications; and
( 3 ) The installation is performed by well-trained, qualified employees under the responsible supervision and control of a person who is a licensed professional engineer in the jurisdiction in which the installation is performed.
( c ) Governmental departments, agencies, or administrations that wish to qualify for interconnection of equipment or security devices pursuant to this section shall file a request with the Secretary of this Commission stating the reasons why the exemption is requested. A list of these departments, agencies, or administrations that have filed requests shall be published in the Federal Register. The Commission may take action with respect to those requests 30 days after publication. The Commission action shall be published in the Federal Register. However, the Commission may grant, on less than the normal notice period or without notice, special temporary authority, not to exceed 90 days, for governmental departments, agencies, or administrations that wish to qualify for interconnection of equipment or security devices pursuant to this section. Requests for such authority shall state the particular fact and circumstances why authority should be granted on less than the normal notice period or without notice. In such cases, the Commission shall endeavor to publish its disposition as promptly as possible in the Federal Register.
[66 FR 7580, Jan. 24, 2001, as amended at 83 FR 8632, Feb. 28, 2018]
No. 11-9515.

#### Jones *v.*Louisiana State Bar Assn. et al.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin*v. *District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U. S. 1 (1992) *(per curiam).*
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  FOR PPL TRANSITION BOND COMPANY, LLC'S 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31,
  2004



In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PPL Transition Bond
  Company, LLC (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed
  with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered
  Report"), I, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer
  of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that:

- The Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
    or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

- The information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.







|Date: May 10, 2004 | /s/ James E. Abel
        James E. Abel
        Manager
        PPL Transition Bond Company, LLC
        (principal executive officer/principal financial officer)
|------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                   |                                                                                                                                                                   







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
  the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# **EXHIBIT31.2        Section 302Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

****

**I, Ryan M. Glista,Chief Financial Officer, Commercial National Financial Corporationcertify that:**

****

I have reviewed this annual reporton Form 10-K of Commercial National FinancialCorporation;

****

Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;

****

Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

****

The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant andwe have:

****

designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls or procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

****

evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and

****

disclosed in this report any changein the registrant's internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;and

****

****

The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and to the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

****

all significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controlover financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and

****

any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financialinformation.

****

****
| Date:  March 29,2005 | By: | /s/ Ryan M.Glista      |
|---------------------------|-----|------------------------|
|                           |     | Ryan M. Glista         |
|                           |     | Chief FinancialOfficer |