alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Revised Brief and Appendix Filing Procedures - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ojb0uOK15K\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/revised-brief-and-appendix-filing-procedures\/\">Revised Brief and Appendix Filing Procedures<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/revised-brief-and-appendix-filing-procedures\/embed\/#?secret=ojb0uOK15K\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Revised Brief and Appendix Filing Procedures” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"ojb0uOK15K\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"On December 1, 2018, the Clerk\u2019s Office will implement two changes to its filing procedures for briefs and appendices: (1) discontinuation of the brief \u201ctendering\u201d practice and (2) deferment of filing of paper copies pursuant to new amendments to the Federal Circuit Rules of Practice.\u00a0 Please see the new Information Sheet: Revised Brief and Appendix […]"}
§ 54.616 Upfront payments. ( a ) Upfront payments include all non-recurring costs for services, equipment, or facilities, other than reasonable and customary installation charges of up to $5,000.
( b ) The following limitations apply to all upfront payments: ( 1 ) Upfront payments associated with services providing a bandwidth of less than 1.5 Mbps (symmetrical) are not eligible for support; and
( 2 ) Only consortium applicants are eligible for support for upfront payments.
( c ) The following limitations apply if a consortium makes a request for support for upfront payments that exceeds, on average, $50,000 per eligible site in the consortium: ( 1 ) The support for the upfront payments must be prorated over at least three years; and
( 2 ) The upfront payments must be part of a multi-year contract.
## NTIA Manual of Regulations & Procedures for Federal Radio Frequency Management  (May 2003 Edition, May 2004 Revisions)

The following documents are provided in the Adobe Acrobat Portable Document Format (*.pdf). Version 6 of the Acrobat Reader includes the capability to read Acrobat documents out loud. The free Acrobat Reader software may be downloaded from the Adobe website.
The latest version of this manual may be purchased from the US Government Printing Office website S/N: 903-008-00000-8, $342.00.

If you would like to be notified whenever a new revision to the NTIA Manual is posted to this site (about once a year), join our email notification list.
ChapterAcrobatfile sizeTitle10.4 MBAuthority and Organization20.2 MBTelecommunication Policy34.1 MBInternational Matters4 	  1.1 MB	  3.0 MB	  2.8 MBAllocations, Allotments and Plans4.1 Frequency AllocationsU.S. Government Table of Frequency AllocationsU.S.Government Table of Frequency Allocations International Footnotes51.8 MBSpectrum Standards60.3 MBDefinitions and Particulars of Assignments70.8 MBAuthorized Frequency Usage82.1 MBProcedures and Principles for the Assignment & Coordination of Frequencies90.9 MBPreparation      of Applications for Frequency Assignment Action100.4 MBProcedures      for the Review of Telecommunication Systems for Frequency Availability,      Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC), and Telecommunications Service Priority      for Radiocommunications (TSP-R)110.1 MBPublic      Access to the Federal Spectrum Management ProcessAnnexAcrobatfile sizeTitleA0.2 MBRecord NotesB8.3 MBData and Procedures for Assessing Interactions Among Stations in the Space and Terrestrial ServicesC0.04 MBReserved for future useD3.5 MBProcedure for Field Level Selection and Coordination of the Use of Radio FrequenciesE0.1 MBGuidance for Submission of INMARSAT Commissioning ApplicationsF0.1 MBFrequency Assignment Review ProcedureG8.0 MBAbbreviationsH0.7 MBAssignment Guide for Maritime Mobile Bands 4-26 MHzI1.2 MBProcedure for Evaluating Frequency Proposals in the 162 - 174 MHz and 406.1 - 420 MHz BandsJ0.5 MBGuidance for Determination of Necessary BandwidthK0.4 MBTechnical Standards for Federal "Non-Licensed" DevicesL0.2 MBFreely Associated StatesM0.1 MBMeasurement MethodsN0.1 MBSpecial Considerations for Federal Travelers Information Stations Operating on 1610 kHz 0.6 MBIndex 0.4 MBIntroduction,	    Holders Letter, Promulgation Letter, PREFACE, Summary of Changes to the	    May 2003 NTIA Manual, INSTRUCTIONS, List of Effective Pages for the 9/2003	    Revision 0.4 MBTable of Contents 0.04 MBCover Page 40.5 MBEntire Manual (not recommended for slow internet connections)Go to NTIA/OSM Home Page.Go to NTIA Home Page.
#### § 90.1101 Location and Monitoring Service subject to competitive bidding.

Mutually exclusive initial applications for multilateration Location and Monitoring Service licenses are subject to competitive bidding. The general competitive bidding procedures set forth in part 1, subpart Q of this chapter will apply unless otherwise provided in this subpart.

[67 FR 45378, July 9, 2002]
No. 10-10829.

#### Frost *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**EXHIBIT 31.1****RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO**I, William C. Ulland, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of IKONICS Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting. 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.        Date:  November 9, 2007 /s/ William C. Ulland   William C. Ulland     Chairman, Chief Executive Officer  and President
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 162 (Tuesday, August 22, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 48948]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7103]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Foreign Claims Settlement Commission


Meeting Notice No. 7-06

    The Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, pursuant to its 
regulations (45 CFR part 504) and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 
U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the scheduling of 
meetings for the transaction of Commission business and other matters 
specified, as follows:

Date and Time: Thursday, August 31, 2006, at 10 a.m.

Subject Matter: Issuance of Proposed Decisions and Amended Final 
Decisions in claims against Albania.

Status: Open.
    All meetings are held at the Foreign claims Settlement Commission, 
600 E Street, NW., Washington, DC. Requests for information, or advance 
notices of intention to observe an open meeting, may be directed to: 
Administrative Officer, Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 600 E 
Street, NW., Room 6002, Washington, DC 20579. Telephone: (202) 616-
6988.

    Dated at Washington, DC.
Mauricio J. Tamargo,
Chairman.
[FR Doc. 06-7103 Filed 8-18-06; 1:36 pm]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-P
#### HANSEN v. JONSON et al.

No. 12481.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Feb. 21, 1951.

Alex Wiley, Seattle, Wash., for appellant.

Johnson & Dafoe, Seattle, Wash., for appellee Ernest A. Jonson.

Barker & Day and William J. Walsh, Jr., all of Seattle, Wash., for appellee R. C. Nicholson.

Before STEPHENS and HEALY, Circuit Judges, and MATHES, District Judge.

MATHES, District Judge.

The order of the district court appealed from provides that the referee’s order approving exemptions to the bankrupt be vacated and that the claim of the bankrupt to exemptions be denied. No exceptions are provided for and the language of the order permits of none.

The record shows that the bankrupt’s claim to exemption of “wearing apparel and ornaments of the person * * * estimated value $300.00” [Rem.Rev.Stat. Wash. § 563] has never been challenged. The only claims of exemption litigated and adjudicated in the district court are those involving proceeds from the sale of property transferred by the bankrupt shortly prior to bankruptcy.

The district court’s order recommits the matter to the referee “for further proceedings * * * not inconsistent with the terms of this order.” We construe the order to permit the trustee to “set apart the bankrupts’ exemptions allowed by law”, Bankruptcy Act § 47, sub.a(6); 11 U.S.C.A. § 75, sub.a(6), other than those adjudged precluded to the bankrupt by § 6 of the Bankruptcy Act. So construed, the order of the district court is affirmed.
- 0912_001
- Memorial-197101-SC
§ 87.145 Acceptability of transmitters for licensing. ( a ) Each transmitter must be certificated for use in these services, except as listed in paragraph (c) of this section. However, aircraft stations which transmit on maritime mobile frequencies must use transmitters certificated for use in ship stations in accordance with part 80 of this chapter. Certification under part 80 is not required for aircraft earth stations transmitting on maritime mobile-satellite frequencies. Such stations must be certificated under part 87.
( b ) Some radio equipment installed on air carrier aircraft must meet the requirements of the Commission and the requirements of the FAA. The FAA requirements may be obtained from the FAA, Aircraft Maintenance Division, 800 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20591.
( c ) The equipment listed below is exempted from certification. The operation of transmitters which have not been certificated must not result in harmful interference due to the failure of those transmitters to comply with technical standards of this subpart. ( 1 ) Flight test station transmitters for limited periods where justified.
( 2 ) U.S. Government transmitters furnished in the performance of a U.S. Government contract if the use of certificated equipment would increase the cost of the contract or if the transmitter will be incorporated in the finished product. However, such equipment must meet the technical standards contained in this subpart.
( 3 ) ELTs verified in accordance with § 87.147(e).
( 4 ) Signal generators when used as radionavigation land test stations (MTF).
( d ) Aircraft earth stations must correct their transmit frequencies for Doppler effect relative to the satellite. The transmitted signal may not deviate more than 335 Hz from the desired transmit frequency. (This is a root sum square error which assumes zero error for the received ground earth station signal and includes the AES transmit/receive frequency reference error and the AES automatic frequency control residual errors.) The applicant must attest that the equipment provides adequate Doppler effect compensation and where applicable, that measurements have been made that demonstrate compliance. Submission of data demonstrating compliance is not required unless requested by the Commission.
[63 FR 36607, July 7, 1998, as amended at 69 FR 32881, June 14, 2004]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                            631
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  16,663
<ALLOWANCES>                                    1,019
<INVENTORY>                                    95,224
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              114,676
<PP&E>                                         96,039
<DEPRECIATION>                                 14,169
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                228,092
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          85,115
<BONDS>                                       152,769
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          54,910
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          102
<OTHER-SE>                                   (70,708)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  228,092
<SALES>                                       164,323
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              164,323
<CGS>                                          80,812
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  61,587
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               21,080
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             20,140
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   844
<INCOME-TAX>                                      636
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               844
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      208
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0


</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00798

- CR

Eric C. MARS

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR9994

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE

, JUSTICE MARION , AND JUSTICE BARNARD

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED July 9 , 2014.

_____________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Interactive Intelligence, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending September
30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I,  Donald E. Brown, M.D., Chairman of the
Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1,
      fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and





(2)
            The information contained in
      the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.








/s/ Donald E. Brown,
M.D.


Donald E.
Brown, M.D.


President
and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
Executive Officer)


November
6, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4598 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4598

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to make technical corrections 
   to maps relating to the Coastal Barrier Resources System, and to 
  authorize appropriations to carry out the Coastal Barrier Resources 
                                  Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CORRECTIONS TO MAPS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Interior shall, before the 
end of the 30-day period beginning on the date of the enactment of this 
Act, make such corrections to the maps described in subsection (b) as 
are necessary to ensure that--
            (1) depictions of areas on those maps are consistent with 
        the depictions of areas appearing on the maps entitled Coastal 
        Barrier Resources System, dated June 29, 1994, and on file with 
        the Secretary of the Interior; and
            (2) the Coastal Barrier Resources System does not include 
        any area that, on the day before the date of the enactment of 
        this Act, was part of unit FL-05P of that System.
    (b) Maps Described.--The maps described in this subsection are maps 
that--
            (1) are included in a set of maps entitled ``Coastal 
        Barrier Resources System'', dated October 24, 1990; and
            (2) relate to the following units of the Coastal Barrier 
        Resources System: FL-05P, P11A, P17, P17A, P18P, P19P, FL-15, 
        FL-95P, FL36P, P31P, FL-72P, MI21, NY75, and VA62P.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 12 of the Coastal 
Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3510) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 12. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    ``There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary for 
carrying out this Act $2,000,000 for each of fiscal years 1994, 1995, 
1996, and 1997.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 12, 1994.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
                                     

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4598

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to make technical corrections 
   to maps relating to the Coastal Barrier Resources System, and to 
  authorize appropriations to carry out the Coastal Barrier Resources 
                                  Act.
```
#### UNITED STATES ex rel. DE GERONIMI v. SHAUGHNESSY.

No. 216, Docket 21950.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued March 12, 1951.

Decided March 27, 1951.

Irving H. Saypol, U. S. Atty., New York City, William J. Sexton, Asst. U. S. Atty., Louis Steinberg, District Counsel and Lester Friedman, Attorney, United States Department of Justice, Immigration and Naturalization Service, all of New York City, of counsel, for appellant.

Paige & Paige, New York City, Samuel Paige and Norma Z. Paige, New York City, of counsel, for appellee.

Before L. HAND, Chief Judge, and SWAN and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This case is before us upon the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, the return thereto and the traverse to the return. From the return it appears that the relator is an alien who entered the United States in June 1949 as a deserting seaman. In March 1950 an immigration warrant of arrest was served upon him and he was released on a $500 administrative bond. On the basis of information subsequently obtained his release on bond was terminated and he was detained without bond under the provisions of the Internal Security Act of 1950, 50 U.S.C.A. § 781 et seq. Adminis*897trative hearings with respect to deporting him are still pending. The return states ample ground for revoking the bail as a matter of discretion. Whether the Internal Security Act of 1950 gives the Attorney General unreviewable discretion as to release on bail, we need not decide. Even if it be assumed that the Attorney General’s action is judicially reviewable, the alien must show an abuse of discretion in the denial of bail before he is entitled to be released. See United States ex rel. Potash v. District Director, 2 Cir., 169 F.2d 747. In the case at bar no proof was offered to contradict the allegations of the return. The order is reversed with directions to dismiss the writ and order the relator back into custody. Our mandate will be issued forthwith.