alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Wise, 122 Ohio St.3d 1213, 2009-Ohio-3725.]

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. WISE. 

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Wise, 122 Ohio St.3d 1213, 2009-Ohio-3725.] 

(No. 1998-2213 — Submitted June 11, 2009 — Decided June 18, 2009.) 

ON PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 

__________________ 

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing on 

December 17, 2008, of a petition for reinstatement by respondent, James Russell 

Wise, Attorney Registration No. 0039046, last known address in Youngstown, 

Ohio. In accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(10)(F), respondent's petition for 

reinstatement was referred to the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and 

Discipline. The board filed its final report in this court on April 10, 2009, 

recommending that respondent be reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio. No 

objections to the final report were filed. Upon consideration thereof, 

{¶ 2} It is ordered by this court that the petition for reinstatement of 

respondent is granted and that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in 

Ohio. 

{¶ 3} It is further ordered, sua sponte, by the court that within 90 days of 

the date of this order, respondent shall reimburse any amounts that have been 

awarded against respondent by the Clients' Security Fund pursuant to Gov.Bar R. 

VIII(7)(F). It is further ordered, sua sponte, by the court that if, after the date of 

this order, the Clients' Security Fund awards any amount against respondent 

pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VIII(7)(F), respondent shall reimburse that amount to the 

Clients' Security Fund within 90 days of the notice of such award. 

{¶ 4} It is further ordered, sua sponte, that all documents filed with this 

court in this case shall meet the filing requirements set forth in the Rules of 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

2 

Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, including requirements as to form, 

number, and timeliness of filings. 

{¶ 5} It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified 

copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be 

made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the 

costs of publication.

{¶ 6} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Wise, 85 Ohio St.3d 

169, 707 N.E.2d 852. 

 MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR,

O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. 

______________________
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 486 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 486

  To provide for the addition of the Truman Farm Home to the Harry S 
        Truman National Historic Site in the State of Missouri.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 1993

  Mr. Wheat introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for the addition of the Truman Farm Home to the Harry S 
        Truman National Historic Site in the State of Missouri.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROPERTY ACQUISITION.

    The first section of the Act entitled ``An Act to establish the 
Harry S Truman National Historic Site in the State of Missouri, and for 
other purposes'', approved May 23, 1983 (97 Stat. 193), is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) The Secretary is further authorized to acquire from Jackson 
County, Missouri, by donation, the real property commonly referred to 
as the Truman Farm Home located in Grandview, Jackson County, Missouri, 
together with associated lands and related structures, comprising 
approximately 5.2 acres.''.

                                 <all>
```
I ,

I



### Served: September30, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC.

DOCKETNO. FAA-2014-0686 (Civil Penalty Action)

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

### This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2014WP910006) has been assigned to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communicationsregarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the otherpersons on the attached Service List.

Attachment

- Service List

### SERVICE LIST - BYU.S. 

### MAIL ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: HearingDocket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1

Todd Emerson,

### Respondent's Counsel SkyWestAirlines, Inc. 444 S. River Road St. George, UT 84790 TEL: 435-634-3530 FAX: 435-634-3505 

### ONE COPY

Jeffrey M. Harper, 

### Complainant's Counsel Federal Aviation Administration Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 1601 Lind Avenue Southwest Renton, W A 98057 TEL: 425-227-2161 FAX: 425-227-1007 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,

### Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. DepartmentofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2014-0686 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 4
#### § 87.17 Scope.

Part 1 of the Commission's rules contains the general rules of practice and procedure applicable to proceedings before the Commission and for the filing of applications for radio station licenses in the aviation services. Specific guidance for each type of radio service license in aviation services is set forth in this part.

[63 FR 68957, Dec. 14, 1998]
[Civ. No. 33253.

First Dist., Div. Two.

Nov. 9, 1973.]

#### RAYMOND K. PROCUNIER, as Director, etc., et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF MONTEREY COUNTY, Respondents; EUGENE RICHARD HERTH et al., Real Parties in Interest.

*212Counsel

Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General, Edward A. Hinz, Jr., Chief Assistant Attorney General, Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, John T. Murphy and Michael Buzzell, Deputy Attorneys General, for Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

Harkjoon Paik, Public Defender, and David A. Barish, Deputy Public Defender, for Real Parties in Interest.

Opinion

TAYLOR, P. J.

We treat this case as a companion to *Procunier*v. Superior *Court*(1 Civ. 33586) *ante,*p. 207 [110 Cal.Rptr. 529], and the question is whether the court’s order requiring disclosure of assertedly privileged information in the possession of petitioners, i.e., building plans, lay-out plats, maps and diagrams that depict the Correctional Training Facility at Soledad (Items 20 and 26) and lists compiled by the Department of Corrections for security purposes indicating inmate membership in organizations known as the Mexican Mafia, the New Family and the Aryan Brotherhood (Item 10), violated petitioners’ privilege to refuse to disclose official information.

Of course, it was the duty of the Attorney General, as the authorized representative of petitioners, to assert below the privilege to refuse to disclose official information pursuant to Evidence Code section 1040 and to advise the trial court that disclosure was expressly forbidden by a statute of this state (Gov. Code, § 6254, subd. (f); see also Gov. Code, § 6255). He neglected to do so.

However, in our opinion, an overwhelming public and governmental interest dictates that the security of the prison system and the safety of the citizens of this state should not be dependent on the happenstance of a *213public official’s familiarity with Evidence Code section 1040 or his assertion of the privilege therein provided.

Let a peremptory writ of mandate issue, directing the trial court to set aside Items 10, 20 and 26 of its discovery order of May 2, 1973.

Kane, J., and Rouse, J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing was denied December 7, 1973, and the petition of real party in interest Gallegos for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied January 23, 1974. Tobriner, J., and Mosk, J., were of the opinion that the petition should be granted.
§ 25.147 Space Stations in the 3.7-4.2 GHz band. The 3.7-4.0 GHz portion of the band is being transitioned in CONUS from FSS GSO (space-to-Earth) to the 3.7 GHz Service. ( a ) New applications for space station licenses and petitions for market access concerning space-to-Earth operations in the 3.7-4.0 GHz portion of the band within CONUS will no longer be accepted.
( b ) Applications for new or modified space station licenses or petitions for market access in the 4.0-4.2 GHz portion of the band within CONUS will not be accepted during the transition except by existing operators in the band to implement an efficient transition.
( c ) Applications for new or modified space station licenses or petitions for market access for space-to-Earth operations in the 3.7-4.2 GHz band outside CONUS will continue to be accepted.
[85 FR 22864, Apr. 23, 2020]
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About Us 
-  ED Offices 
-  Office For Civil Rights (OCR) 

# Serial Reports Regarding OCR Activities

These reports summarize OCR’s policy and enforcement  activities for the applicable fiscal years.  

The reports are required by Section 203(b) of the Department  of Education Organization Act of 1979, Pub. L. No. 96-88, which provides that  the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights shall make a report to the Secretary  and the President “summarizing the compliance and enforcement activities of the  Office for Civil Rights and identifying significant civil rights or compliance  problems as to which such Office has made a recommendation for corrective  action and as to which, in the judgment of the Assistant Secretary, adequate  progress is not being made.”  20 U.S.C. § 3413(b)(1).  

The requirement that the Assistant Secretary also make the  report to Congress was terminated, effective December 21, 1999, by Section 3003  of the Federal Reports Elimination and Sunset Act of 1995, Pub. L. No.  104-66.  

                  - 2023  PDF  (28.2M)  *NEW!* 
                  - 2022  PDF  (6.9M)    
                  - 2021  PDF  (6.4M)   
                  - 2020  PDF  (3.54M)   
                  - 2019  PDF  (3.61M)
                  - 2017-18   PDF  (2.60M)
                  - 2016   PDF  (4.19M)      
                  - 2015   PDF  (7.41M) 
                  -      2013-2014   PDF  (4.15M)   
                  -      2009-12   PDF  (7M)   
                  -      2007-08   PDF  (3.39M)   
                  -  2006
                  -  2005
                  -  2004
                  -  2003
                  - 2001-2002
                  -  2000
                  -  1999
                  -  1998
                  -  1997
                  -  1996
                  -  1995
                  -  1993   PDF  (357.78K)
                  -  1992   PDF  (989.4K)
                  -  1991   PDF  (1.11M)
                  -  1990   PDF  (1.19M)

Page Last Reviewed: 

## Related Content

### June 2021 Title IX Public Hearing

### Disability Discrimination

### Race, Color, or National Origin Discrimination
No. 11-5599.

#### Berry *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### § 80.459 Digital selective calling.

Subpart H of this part lists frequencies assignable for DSC.
#### § 9.22 Definitions.

For purposes of this subpart, the terms in this section have the following meanings set forth in this section. Furthermore, where the Commission uses the term “acceptable” in this subpart, it is for purposes of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, Public Law 116-260, Division FF, Title IX, section 902(c)(1)(C).

*911 fee or charge.* A fee or charge applicable to commercial mobile services, IP-enabled voice services, or other emergency communications services specifically designated by a State or taxing jurisdiction for the support or implementation of 911 services. A 911 fee or charge shall also include a fee or charge designated for the support of public safety, emergency services, or similar purposes if the purposes or allowable uses of such fee or charge include the support or implementation of 911 services.

*Diversion.* The obligation or expenditure of a 911 fee or charge for a purpose or function other than the purposes and functions designated by the Commission as acceptable pursuant to § 9.23. Diversion also includes distribution of 911 fees to a political subdivision that obligates or expends such fees for a purpose or function other than those designated as acceptable by the Commission pursuant to § 9.23.

*Other emergency communications services.* The provision of emergency information to a public safety answering point via wire or radio communications, and may include 911 and E911 service.

*State.* Any of the several States, the District of Columbia, or any territory or possession of the United States.

*State or taxing jurisdiction.* A State, political subdivision thereof, Indian Tribe, or village or regional corporation serving a region established pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1601 *et seq.*).
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4571 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4571

                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
 the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  four


                                 An Act

  
 
  To designate the United States Post Office building located at 103-104 
Estate Richmond in Saint Croix, Virgin Islands, as the ``Wilbert 
Armstrong Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States Post Office building located at 103-104 Estate 
Richmond in Saint Croix, Virgin Islands, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Wilbert Armstrong Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the Wilbert Armstrong Post Office.







                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.







                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.`
#### § 64.6080 Per-Call or Per-Connection Charges.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 77365, Sept. 20, 2024.

No Provider shall impose a Per-Call or Per-Connection Charge on a Consumer for any interstate or international calls.

[85 FR 67462, Oct. 23, 2020]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. JASON ERIC KUHNS, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 306 WAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 29th day of October, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
#### § 73.3518 Inconsistent or conflicting applications.

While an application is pending and undecided, no subsequent inconsistent or conflicting application may be filed by or on behalf of or for the benefit of the same applicant, successor or assignee.

[44 FR 38487, July 2, 1979]
#### § 22.702 Eligibility.

Existing and proposed communications common carriers are eligible to hold authorizations to operate conventional central office, interoffice and rural stations in the Rural Radiotelephone Service. Subscribers are also eligible to hold authorizations to operate rural subscriber stations in the Rural Radiotelephone Service.

[69 FR 75170, Dec. 15, 2004]
Order entered September 1 7 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 19 - 00725 - CV IN RE JEROME JOHNSON , Relator O rigi nal Proceeding from the 291st Judicial District Cou rt

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F01 - 53637 - JH



### O RDER Before the Court is relator’s September 6, 2019 pro se objection to the Court’s order and memorandum opinion denying relief
. Appellant is represented by counsel. Appellant is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Miniel v. State , 831 S.W.2d 310, 313 n.1 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992). Accordingly, appellant’s motion is DENIED
. /s/ ROBBIE PARTIDA

- KIPNESS JUSTICE
§ 76.616 Operation near certain aeronautical and marine emergency radio frequencies. ( a ) The transmission of carriers or other signal components capable of delivering peak power levels equal to or greater than 10−5 watts at any point in a cable television system is prohibited within 100 kHz of the frequency 121.5 MHz, and is prohibited within 50 kHz of the two frequencies 156.8 MHz and 243.0 MHz.
( b ) At any point on a cable system from 405.925 MHz to 406.176 MHz analog transmissions are prohibited from delivering peak power levels equal to or greater than 10−5 watts. The transmission of digital signals in this range is limited to power levels measured using a root-mean-square detector of less than 10−5 watts in any 30 kHz bandwidth over any 2.5 millisecond interval.
[69 FR 57862, Sept. 28, 2004]
No. 11-168.

#### Harrison *v.*Gillespie.

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of Constitutional Accountability Center for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae*granted. Certiorari denied.
----

            DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 37/2005

of 11 March 2005         

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following shall be added in point 1 (Directive 94/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XXXI of Annex II to the Agreement:

                     ‘, as amended by:

Article 2

The texts of Directive 2003/44/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 12 March 2005, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 11 March 2005.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Richard WRIGHT            

----

(1)OJ L 372, 31.12.1994, p. 20.

(2)OJ L 214, 26.8.2003, p. 18.

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

----
#### York Realty Company, a corporation, *Plaintiff in Error,*vs. The Seaboard Oil Company, a corporation, *Defendant in Error.*

143 So. 128.

*267En Banc.

Decision filed July 22, 1932.

Petition for rehearing denied September 27, 1932.

*G. H. Martin,*of Port Lauderdale, for Plaintiff in Error;

*Julian Eartridge, of Jacksonville,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in said judgment. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Buford C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Advanced ID Corporation (the "Company"),
hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                 /s/Dan Finch
                                 ----------------------
                                 Dan Finch
                                 Chief Executive Officer

October 1, 2009

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Advanced ID Corporation (the "Company"),
hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                 /s/Seymour Kazimirski
                                 ----------------------
                                 Seymour Kazimirski
                                 Chief Financial Officer

October 1, 2009
Amendment to Letter Agreement



 Exhibit 10.16(b) 
 Exhibit A 
 APL – Spectrum Acquisition 
 Acquisition Look Back Example For Employment Agreement 
  

					
	 Most recent quarterly distribution
	  	 	0.63	 
	 Multiplied by four
	  	 	4	 
		  	 	 	 
	 Annualized distribution
	  	$	2.52	 
		
	 Closing price of APL common unit on 12/31/2008
	  	$	38.00	 
		
	 Yield (distribution/Closing price)
	  	 	7.20	%
		
	 Distributed Cash Flow generated by acquisition during the 12 months ended 12/31/2008
	  	$	10,000,000	 
		
	 Imputed Value (Dist Cash Flow / Yield)
	  	$	138,888,889	 
		
	 Incentive %
	  	 	1.50	%
		
	 Incentive amount (Imputed value * Incentive %)
	  	$	2,083,333	 
		
	 # of units issued (Incentive amount / unit price)
	  	 	59,524