alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Rate Commission

# Name of Agency:

Postal Rate Commission. 

# Time and Date:

Monday, August 28, 2006, at 3 p.m. 

# Place:

Commission conference room, 901 New York Avenue, NW., Suite 200, Washington, DC 20268-0001. 

# Status:

Open. 

# *Matters to be Considered*:                    

Consideration of fiscal year 2007 budget and election of vice chairman.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, at 202-789-6820. 

Dated: August 24, 2006. 

Steven W. Williams, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 06-7234 Filed 8-24-06; 4:37 pm]

BILLING CODE 7710-FW-M
No. 11-5150.

#### Kiderlen *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 168 (Wednesday, August 30, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 51616]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7352]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

DATE AND TIME: Thursday, September 7, 2006, 9:30 a.m. eastern time.

PLACE: Clearance M. Mitchell, Jr. Conference Room on the Ninth Floor of 
the EEOC Office Building, 1801 ``L'' Street, NW., Washington, DC 20507.

STATUS: The meeting will be open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Open Session

    1. Announcement of Notation Votes, and
    2. Federal Sector EEO Investigations--Panels of Invited Experts.

    Note: In accordance with the Sunshine Act, the meeting will be 
open to public observation of the Commission's deliberations and 
voting. (In addition to publishing notices on EEOC Commission 
meetings in the Federal Register, the Commission also provides a 
recorded announcement a full week in advance on future Commission 
sessions).

    Please telephone (202) 663-7100 (voice) and (202) 663-4074 (TTY) at 
any time for information on these meetings. The EEOC provides sign 
language interpretation at Commission meetings for the hearing 
impaired. Requests for other reasonable accommodations may be made by 
using the voice and TTY numbers listed above.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Stephen Llewellyn, Acting 
Executive Officer on (202) 663-4070.

    Issued August 28, 2006.
Stephen Llewellyn,
Acting Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 06-7352 Filed 8-28-06; 2:53 pm]
BILLING CODE 6570-06-M
#### § 76.935 Participation of interested parties.

In order to regulate basic tier rates or associated equipment costs, a franchising authority must have procedural laws or regulations applicable to rate regulation proceedings that provide a reasonable opportunity for consideration of the views of interested parties. Such rules must take into account the 30, 120, or 180-day time periods that franchising authorities have to review rates under § 76.933.
United States Cyber Command and

The College of Information and 

Cyberspace National Defense University

Marshall Hall

Dec 5th, 2023

FOCUS O N TH E FUTURE
0730 - 0800

0800 - 0805

0805 - 0810

0810 - 0840

Check-in and Breakfast

Opening Remarks

Welcoming Remarks

Keynote Address 

0840 - 0900 Break and Network

0900 - 1015 Panel 1: Technology & Capabilities

1015 - 1030 Break and Network

1145 - 1245

Afternoon Keynote Address

1315 - 1430 Panel 3: Strategy & Policy

1430 - 1445 Break and Network

1445 - 1600 Panel 4: Synthesis & Insights

1630 - 1700

1700 - 1900

Closing Remarks

Social

FOCUS O N TH E FUTURE

1030 - 1145 Panel 2: People & Partnerships

1600 - 1630 Leader Fireside Chat

Lunch and Network

1245- 1315
FOCUS O N T H E FUTURE 
FOCUS O N T H E FUTURE 
FOCUS O N T H E FUTURE 
FOCUS O N T H E FUTURE 
FOCUS O N T H E FUTURE 
FOCUS O N T H E FUTURE 
FOCUS O N T H E FUTURE 
FOCUS O N T H E FUTURE 
United States Cyber Command and

The College of Information and 

Cyberspace National Defense University

Marshall Hall

Dec 5th, 2023

FOCUS O N TH E FUTURE
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4595 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4595

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 29 (legislative day, June 7), 1994

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To designate the building located at 4021 Laclede in St. Louis, 
 Missouri, for the period of time during which it houses operations of 
the United States Postal Service, as the ``Marian Oldham Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The building located at 4021 Laclede in St. Louis, Missouri, shall, 
for the period of time during which it houses operations of the United 
States Postal Service, be known and designated as the ``Marian Oldham 
Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall, with respect to the period referred to in section 1, be deemed 
to be a reference to the Marian Oldham Post Office.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 27, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1280/2005

of 3 August 2005         

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of 21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 4 August 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 August 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1947/2002 (OJ L 299, 1.11.2002, p. 17).

----

ANNEX

to Commission Regulation of 3 August 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

----

(1)  Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 750/2005 (OJ L 126, 19.5.2005, p. 12). Code ‘            999            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

----
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4881 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4881

     To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to disregard up to 
    $15,000,000 of capital expenditures in applying the provisions 
     permitting a $10,000,000 limit on qualified small issue bonds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 1, 1994

  Mr. McHale introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to disregard up to 
    $15,000,000 of capital expenditures in applying the provisions 
     permitting a $10,000,000 limit on qualified small issue bonds.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Capital Expenditure Expansion Act of 
1994''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF CAPITAL EXPENDITURE RULES RELATING TO QUALIFIED 
              SMALL ISSUE BONDS.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (A) of section 144(a)(4) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to $10,000,000 limit in certain 
cases) is amended by adding at the end the following new flush 
sentence:
                ``Capital expenditures (financed otherwise than out of 
                the proceeds of outstanding tax-exempt issues) shall 
                not be taken into account under clause (ii) to the 
                extent such expenditures do not exceed $15,000,000.''
    (b) Technical Amendment.--Paragraph (4) of section 144(a) of such 
Code is amended by striking subparagraph (F).
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to--
            (1) obligations issued after the date of the enactment of 
        this Act, and
            (2) capital expenditures made after such date with respect 
        to obligations issued on or before such date.
                                 <all>
```
Filed by Automated Filing Services Inc. (604)609-0244 - K-Care Nutritional Products Inc. - Exhibit 4.0










 Form of Share Certificate 

 INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

 [LOGO] 

CUSIP NO. [sample] K-Care Nutritional Products Inc. 

 AUTHORIZED COMMON STOCK: 80,000,000 SHARES 

  PAR VALUE: $.0001 PER SHARE 

 THIS CERTIFIES THAT 

 [SAMPLE] 

 IS THE RECORD HOLDER OF __________________

           Shares
  of K-CARE NUTRITIONAL PRODUCTS INC. Common Stock transferable on the books of
  the Corporation in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this
  Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid until countersigned
  by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar. 


Witness the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. 

	 Dated:
    	 	  
	 Secretary 	 	 President 


 [K-CARE NUTRITIONAL PRODUCTS INC. CORPORATE SEAL NEVADA] 


Signature must be guaranteed by a firm which is a member of a registered national stock exchange, or by a bank (other than a savings bank), or a trust company. The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this
certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations. 


Additional abbreviations may also be used though not on the above list. 

 For Value Received, _______ hereby sell, assign and transfer
  unto 

 PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER

  IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE 




(Please print or typewrite name and address, including zip
  code or assignee) 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

                                                                                                                                            Shares


of the capital stock represented by the within certificate,
  and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint 

____________________________________________________________Attorney



to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. 

 Dated: ____________________________________________


NOTICE: The signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as written upon the face of the certificate in every particular without alteration or enlargement or any change whatever
EXHIBIT 31.2

Certification

I, Denise D. Roberts
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the American Express Credit Account Master Trust (the Exchange Act periodic
reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing or other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based
on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing
agreements in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I
have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon and TransCentra, Inc. (formerly known as Regulus Group LLC).



|                    |  |                                                          
|------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 8, 2017
|                    | 
|By:                 |  | /s/ Denise D. Roberts                                    
|Name:               |  | Denise D. Roberts                                        
|Title:              |  | President                                                
|                    |  | American Express Receivables Financing Corporation IV LLC
|                    |  | (Senior officer in charge of securitization)
§ 90.656 Responsibilities of base station licensees of Specialized Mobile Radio systems. ( a ) The licensees of base stations that provide Specialized Mobile Radio service on a commercial basis of the use of individuals, Federal government agencies, or persons eligible for licensing under either subparts B or C of this part will be responsible for exercising effective operational control over all mobile and control stations that communicate with the base station. The base station licensee will be responsible for assuring that its system is operated in compliance with all applicable rules and regulations.
( b ) Customers that operate mobile units on a particular Specialized Mobile Radio system will be licensed to that system. A customer that operates temporarily on more than one system will be deemed, when communicating with the other system, to be temporarily licensed to the other system and for that temporary period, the licensee of the other system will assume the same licensee responsibility for the customer's mobile station(s) as if the customer's stations were licensed to that other system.
[57 FR 40851, Sept. 8, 1992, as amended at 62 FR 18935, Apr. 17, 1997]
No. 10-1513.

#### Defoe, a Minor, By and Through His Parent and Guardian Defoe, et al. *v.*Spiva et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed February 16, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-1350

Lower Tribunal No. 19-24318 CC

________________

Kyle Melkonian,

Appellant,

vs.

The Office of Code Enforcement, etc.,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Luis 

Perez-Medina, Judge.

Kyle Melkonian, in proper person.

Geraldine Bonzon Keenan, Miami-Dade County Attorney, and Zach 

Vosseler, Assistant County Attorney, for appellee.

Before EMAS, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ. 

BOKOR, J.
2

Based on Miami-Dade County’s partial confession of error, we vacate 

the dismissal for lack of prosecution. The County argues that dismissal is 

nonetheless appropriate due to a failure to exhaust administrative 

remedies. Miami-Dade County includes in its appendix a circuit court 

appellate division opinion. See Melkonian v. Miami-Dade Cnty. Code Enf’t, 

No. 2019-271 AP 01 (Fla. 11th Cir. Ct. Apr. 28, 2020). That opinion 

concludes by remanding the matter to the county court for proceedings

consistent with that opinion. As the county court dismissed the matter for 

lack of prosecution and did not have the opportunity to comply with the 

mandate of the circuit court appellate division, we conclude that the more 

prudent course here would be to vacate the dismissal for lack of 

prosecution, and permit the county court to proceed as appropriate. 

Reversed and remanded.
#### § 65.306 Calculation accuracy.

In a prescription proceeding, the final determinations of the cost of equity, cost of debt, cost of preferred stock and their capital structure weights shall be accurate to two decimal places.

[60 FR 28546, June 1, 1995]
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
**Exhibit 32.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
     The undersigned hereby certifies that, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Western WaterCompany, that this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of Western WaterCompany.
October 15, 2004    /S/ Michael Patrick George    Michael Patrick George President, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided toWestern Water Company and will be retained by Western Water Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.*
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-11685, 33-88135, 333-40930, 333-49298, 333-85861, 333-106422, 333-110245, 333-112011, 333-113629, 333-116548, 333-125081, 333-130969, 333-136511, 333-147288 and 333-148197), 333-149503 and333-156915, and Form S-3 (No. 333-108343) of Electronics For Imaging, Inc. of our report dated March 2, 2009, relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,which appears in this Form 10-K. 

**/s/    PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP**

San Jose, California 

March 2, 2009
Exhibit 23.2








Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








We consent to the use of our report dated March 11, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries for the years ended December 31, 2010 included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, and to their use (directly or through incorporation by reference), and to the reference to our Firm under the caption “Experts” (if applicable), in each of the following:  the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-07377) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan; the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-53400) pertaining to the Special Purpose Stock Option Plan; the Registration Statement Form S-8 (No. 333-73000) pertaining to the 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan; the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-73002) pertaining to the 2000 Stock Option Plan; the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-152706) pertaining to the SPAR Group, Inc. 2008 Stock Compensation Plan; the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-72998) pertaining to the 2001 Consultant Stock Purchase Plan of SPAR Group, Inc.; the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-162657) pertaining to the registered offering and sale of certain shares of common stock of SPAR Group, Inc.; and each related Prospectus, Supplemental Prospectus or Summary Description.
 
 /s/ Nitin Mittal and Co.
 
 
 New Delhi, India
 
 May 29, 2012
#### William McKinley STEGALL, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 11210.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

March 6, 1951.

Leon Wolf, Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellant.

David C. Walls, Charles F. Wood, and Norris W. Reigler, all of Louisville, Ky., for appellee.

Before HICKS, Chief Judge, and ALLEN and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This case came on to 'be heard on the record and briefs, and oral argument of counsel.

And it appearing that the Government concedes that count 1 of the indictment is duplicitous;

And it appearing that no demurrer to the indictment was filed, nor objection thereto made prior to the verdict, and that the accused thus waived any right to complain because of the duplicity existing in count 1; Beauchamp v. United States, 6 Cir., 154 F.2d 413, certiorari denied, 329 U.S. 723, *73667 S.Ct. 66, 91 L.Ed. 626, rehearing denied, 329 U.S. 826, 67 S.Ct. 183, 91 L.Ed. 702; Sparks v. United States, 6 Cir., 90 F.2d 61, 63;

And it appearing that the material allegations of both counts of the indictment were proved by convincing and undisputed evidence ;

And it appearing that the court sentenced the accused under count 2 of the indictment and that no sentence was imposed under count 1;

And it appearing that no error prejudicial to the accused is presented in the record or in the charge of the trial court (Cf. Sparks v. United States, supra):

It is ordered that the judgment be, and it hereby is, affirmed.
No. 11-10120.

#### Patillo *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.