alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.47

                                                     E x e c u t i o n   C o p y

                                                          As of February 1, 1996



Mr. Ira Yellin
The Yellin Company
304 South Broadway
Suite 201
Los Angeles, CA 90013

Dear Ira:

     This letter will confirm our understanding with respect to certain benefits
to be provided to you by Catellus Development Corporation ("Catellus") pursuant
to that certain Employment Agreement between Catellus and you dated as of
February 1, 1996 (the "Employment Agreement").  Capitalized terms used herein
but not defined shall be used as defined in the Employment Agreement.

     Section 1.9 of the Employment Agreement provides that the Company will
assume the payment of insurance premiums on your existing life insurance policy.
The current premium on such existing policy is $7,287.76 per year, which premium
may, pursuant to the terms of such existing policy, increase over time.  Section
1.9 also provides that the Company will assume the payment of insurance premiums
on your existing disability policy unless comparable insurance may be obtained
under the Company's group disability insurance policy for a lower annual
premium.  The current premium on that policy is $7,100 per year.

     Section 1.10 of the Employment Agreement provides that you will be entitled
to monthly reimbursement for certain business expenses, including an automobile
allowance comparable to that received by other senior executives.  Catellus
agrees that in the event the auto allowance given other senior executives is not
$900 per month, Catellus will enter into an amendment to the Employment
Agreement to provide for an auto allowance of $900 per month or increase your
Base Salary in the amount of the difference between $900 per month and your auto
allowance.

     In addition, Catellus and you agree that during the term of the Employment
Agreement Catellus will reimburse you for the annual fees, parking and related
expenses for a season box at the Hollywood Bowl, provided such box is made
<PAGE>

available to other employees of Catellus for business-related purposes.
Catellus agrees that you will continue to own the rights to the box and will be
responsible for allocating the use of the box.

                                    Very truly yours,

                                    CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION


                                    By: /s/ Nelson C. Rising
                                       -----------------------------
                                    Title:
                                          --------------------------

ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED TO:

/s/ Ira Yellin

Ira Yellin
OPPT ·2013-0225 • 

Scanned & Processed in 

CIS by: PAULA 12/3/2014 

COMMENTS: DOCKET 
GENERAL CONTACT REPORT 

Draft I Internal Deliberative 

I. Type of Contact (Telephone, Meeting, etc.): CBI? 

Telephone Yes 

II. EPA Information 

Name(s) of EPA Reprcscntative(s): Date/Time: 

Greg Fritz December 2012 

Division/Branch & Phone#: Contact Initiator? 

GF with EETD/ICB (202) 564-8583 Yes 

III. Second }>arty Information 

Namc(s) of Second Party Representative(s): PMN Number I Topic: 

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Form U Accession# 

Company & Phone#: Contact Initiator? 

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx No 

IV. Summary of Issues Discussed and Comments Received: 

The following chemistry issues were discussed after voicemail and email tag. ""' = -..,.. 

Questions: A) In the 2012 CDR Form U you report Accession number c:;:J 

~ ,..,., 

xxxxxxxxxxxxx " I - w - Answer A] ~ ' 

~ 

a ( 

Q B) w 

Answer B] I.D 

Signature of EPA Official: Greg Fritz 

Date December 2012 

SANITIZED
June 10, 2015 

 

 

Mr. Bert Reed 

2745 Powell Court 

Monroe, GA 30656 

Dear Mr. Reed: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your May 11, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

1299), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
#### § 65.303 Cost of preferred stock.

The formula for determining the cost of preferred stock is:

[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER01JN95.001/ER01JN95.001_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER01JN95.001/ER01JN95.001_original_size.png)

Where:

“Total Annual Preferred Dividends” is the total dividends on preferred stock for the most recent two years for all local exchange carriers with annual revenues equal to or above the indexed revenue threshold as defined in [§ 32.9000](/on/2024-09-20/title-47/section-32.9000). “Proceeds from the Issuance of Preferred Stock” is the average of the total net proceeds from the issuance of preferred stock for the most recent two years for all local exchange carriers with annual revenues equal to or above the indexed revenue threshold as defined in [§ 32.9000](/on/2024-09-20/title-47/section-32.9000).

[[60 FR 28545](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/60-FR-28545), June 1, 1995, as amended at [67 FR 5702](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/67-FR-5702), Feb. 6, 2002]
EXHIBIT 32.2


              Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2003 (the "Report"), by SPAR Group, Inc. (the "Registrant"), the undersigned
hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




                                /s/ Charles Cimitile
                                ------------------------------------------------
                                Charles Cimitile
                                Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary

                                 March 30, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to SPAR Group, Inc. and will be retained by SPAR Group, Inc., and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.111


    
      

    

    Exhibit
      10.111

     

    

     

     

    
 

    March
      14,
      2007

    


    Scott
      R.
      Silverman

    Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer

    VeriChip
      Corporation

    1690
      South Congress Avenue, Suite 200

    Delray
      Beach, Florida 33445

     

    Re:
      Payments
      under Incentive Agreement

    


    Dear
      Mr.
      Silverman:

    


    Enclosed
      with this letter is 503,768 shares (the “Shares”) of common stock of Applied
      Digital Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) which have been issued under the
      Company’s 1999 Flexible Executive Stock Plan and the Company’s 2003 Flexible
      Executive Stock Plan as partial payment in connection with the Company’s
      obligations under that certain Incentive Agreement dated December 5, 2006,
      between you and the Company (the “Agreement”). The Agreement will remain in full
      force and effect for the remaining portion of the payment thereunder ($2.3
      million). This letter is, among other things, intended to partially satisfy
      certain terms of the Agreement, including the Company’s election to satisfy a
      portion of its obligation now by issuing 503,768 shares with a value as of
      this
      date of $735,501.28 and a cash payment of $264,498.72. These shares are issued
      outright with no risk of forfeiture.

    


    You
      further agree that you will not require the Company to make the remaining
      portion of the payment ($2.3 million) to you until the earlier of April 1,
      2008
      or the receipt of funds by the Company in excess of $4.0 million in a single
      transaction resulting from (i) the issuance of the Company’s equity; or (ii) the
      sale of one of the Company’s assets, including the shares of Digital Angel
      Corporation or VeriChip common stock that the Company owns.

    


    Sincerely,

     

    /s/
      Michael Krawitz

    


    Michael
      Krawitz

     

    Accepted
      and agreed to as of

    the
      14
      day of March, 2007:

    


    


    /s/
      Scott R.
      Silverman                                       
 

    Scott
      R.
      Silverman

     

     

     

    

      1690
        S.
        Congress Avenue    .    Suite
        200    .    Delray
        Beach,
        FL 33445

      voice
        561.805.8000    .    fax
        561.805.8001
#### § 73.603 Numerical designation of television channels.

(a)

| Channel No. | Frequency band (MHz) |
| --- | --- |
| 2 | 54-60 |
| 3 | 60-66 |
| 4 | 66-72 |
| 5 | 76-82 |
| 6 | 82-88 |
| 7 | 174-180 |
| 8 | 180-186 |
| 9 | 186-192 |
| 10 | 192-198 |
| 11 | 198-204 |
| 12 | 204-210 |
| 13 | 210-216 |
| 14 | 470-476 |
| 15 | 476-482 |
| 16 | 482-488 |
| 17 | 488-494 |
| 18 | 494-500 |
| 19 | 500-506 |
| 20 | 506-512 |
| 21 | 512-518 |
| 22 | 518-524 |
| 23 | 524-530 |
| 24 | 530-536 |
| 25 | 536-542 |
| 26 | 542-548 |
| 27 | 548-554 |
| 28 | 554-560 |
| 29 | 560-566 |
| 30 | 566-572 |
| 31 | 572-578 |
| 32 | 578-584 |
| 33 | 584-590 |
| 34 | 590-596 |
| 35 | 596-602 |
| 36 | 602-608 |
| 37 | 608-614 |

(b) [Reserved]

(c) Channel 37, 608-614 MHz is reserved exclusively for the radio astronomy service.

(d) In Hawaii, the frequency band 488-494 MHz is allocated for non-broadcast use. This frequency band (Channel 17) will not be assigned in Hawaii for use by television broadcast stations.

[28 FR 13660, Dec. 14, 1963, as amended at 35 FR 11179, July 11, 1970; 39 FR 10576, Mar. 21, 1974; 47 FR 16789, Apr. 20, 1982; 47 FR 30068, July 12, 1982; 47 FR 35989, Aug. 18, 1982; 51 FR 18450, May 20, 1986; 70 FR 46676, Aug. 10, 2005; 86 FR 66195, Nov. 22, 2021]
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4880 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4880

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit the issuance of 
    tax-exempt bonds for air and water pollution control facilities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 1, 1994

  Mr. McHale introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit the issuance of 
    tax-exempt bonds for air and water pollution control facilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pollution Control Equipment 
Investment Act of 1994''.

SEC. 2. TAX-EXEMPT BONDS FOR AIR AND WATER POLLUTION CONTROL 
              FACILITIES.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (a) of section 142 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (defining exempt facility bond) is amended by 
striking ``or'' at the end of paragraph (11), by striking the period at 
the end of paragraph (12) and inserting ``, or'', and by adding at the 
end the following new paragraph:
            ``(13) air or water pollution control facilities.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to obligations issued after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
No. 11-5826.

#### Marcusse *v.*United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
----

----

I Πράξεις για την ισχύ των οποίων απαιτείται δημοσίευση

----

ΚΑΝΟΝΙΣΜΌΣ (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1089/2005 ΤΗΣ ΕΠΙΤΡΟΠΉΣ

της 11ης Ιουλίου 2005

για καθορισμό των κατ' αποκοπή τιμών κατά την εισαγωγή για τον καθορισμότης τιμής εισόδου ορισμένων οπωροκηπευτικών

Η ΕΠΙΤΡΟΠΗ ΤΩΝ ΕΥΡΩΠΑΪΚΩΝ ΚΟΙΝΟΤΗΤΩΝ,

Έχοντας υπόψη:

τη συνθήκη για την ίδρυση της Ευρωπαϊκής Κοινότητας,

τον κανονισμό (ΕΚ) αριθ. 3223/94 της Επιτροπής, της 21ης Δεκεμβρίου 1994, σχετικά με τις λεπτομέρειες εφαρμογής του καθεστώτος κατά την εισαγωγή οπωροκηπευτικών (1), και ιδίως το άρθρο 4 παράγραφος 1,

Εκτιμώντας τα ακόλουθα:

ΕΞΕΔΩΣΕ ΤΟΝ ΠΑΡΟΝΤΑ ΚΑΝΟΝΙΣΜΟ:

Άρθρο 1

Οι κατ' αποκοπή τιμές κατά την εισαγωγή που αναφέρονται στο άρθρο 4 του κανονισμού (ΕΚ) αριθ. 3223/94 καθορίζονται όπως αναγράφονται στον πίνακα που εμφαίνεται στο παράρτημα.

Άρθρο 2

Ο παρών κανονισμός αρχίζει να ισχύει στις 12 Ιουλίου 2005.

Ο παρών κανονισμός είναι δεσμευτικός ως προς όλα τα μέρη του και ισχύει άμεσα σε κάθε κράτος μέλος.

Βρυξέλλες, 11 Ιουλίου 2005.

Για την Επιτροπή

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Γενικός Διευθυντής Γεωργίας και Αγροτικής Ανάπτυξης

----

(1)ΕΕ L 337 της 24.12.1994, σ. 66· κανονισμός όπως τροποποιήθηκε τελευταία από τον κανονισμό (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1947/2002 (ΕΕ L 299 της 1.11.2002, σ. 17).

----

ΠΑΡΑΡΤΗΜΑ

του κανονισμού της Επιτροπής, της 11ης Ιουλίου 2005, για τον καθορισμό των κατ' αποκοπή τιμών κατά την εισαγωγή για τον καθορισμό τιμών εισόδου ορισμένων οπωροκηπευτικών

----

(1)  Ονοματολογία των χωρών που καθορίζεται από τον κανονισμό (ΕΚ) αριθ. 750/2005 της Επιτροπής (ΕΕ L 126 της 19.5.2005, σ. 12). Ο κωδικός «999» αντιπροσωπεύει «άλλες καταγωγές».

----

Διορθωτικά

----

Διορθωτικό στον κανονισμό (ΕΚ) αριθ. 991/2005 της Επιτροπής, της 28ης Ιουνίου 2005, περί θεσπίσεως των κατά μονάδα αξιών για τον καθορισμό της δασμολογητέας αξίας ορισμένων αναλωσίμων εμπορευμάτων

(Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης L 168 της 30ής Ιουνίου 2005)

Σελίδα 12 στο παράρτημα, τελευταία αναφορά «2.30 Ανανάδες νωποί» στην τρίτη στήλη «EUR»:

αντί:

«62,26»

διάβαζε:

«65,26».

----
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4834 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4834

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the requirement 
  that States pay unemployment compensation on the basis of services 
                     performed by election workers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 26, 1994

  Mr. Upton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the requirement 
  that States pay unemployment compensation on the basis of services 
                     performed by election workers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That (a) paragraph (3) 
of section 3309(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to 
exception for certain services) is amended by striking ``or'' at the 
end of subparagraph (D), by adding ``or'' at the end of subparagraph 
(E), and by inserting after subparagraph (E) the following new 
subparagraph:
                    ``(F) an election official or election worker if 
                the amount of remuneration reasonably expected to be 
                received by the individual during the calendar year for 
                services as an election official or election worker is 
                less than $200;''.
    (b) The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply to services 
performed after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
No. 11-9561.

#### Guerrero *v.*Texas.

Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied.
§ 54.10 Prohibition on use of certain Federal subsidies. ( a ) A Federal subsidy made available through a program administered by the Commission that provides funds to be used for the capital expenditures necessary for the provision of advanced communications service may not be used to: ( 1 ) Purchase, rent, lease, or otherwise obtain any covered communications equipment or service; or
( 2 ) Maintain any covered communications equipment or service previously purchased, rented, leased, or otherwise obtained.
( b ) The term “covered communications equipment or service” is defined in § 1.50001 of this chapter.
( c ) The prohibition in paragraph (a) of this section applies to any covered communications equipment or service beginning on the date that is 60 days after the date on which such equipment or service is placed on a published list pursuant to § 1.50003 of this chapter. In the case of any covered communications equipment or service that is on the initial list published pursuant to § 1.50002 of this chapter, such equipment or service shall be treated as being placed on the list on the date which such list is published.
[86 FR 2946, Jan. 13, 2021]
Exhibit 10.C



 Exhibit 10 (c) 
 THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE 
 FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED 
 AGREEMENT OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OF 
 SAUL SUBSIDIARY II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 
 THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OF SAUL
SUBSIDIARY II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (this “Third Amendment”) is made as of December 20, 2006. 
 WHEREAS, the General Partner
has determined it is in the best interests of all of the Partners to increase the percentage rate of the Guaranteed Payment made under Article 5 of the First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Saul Subsidiary II Limited
Partnership (the “Agreement”), and to clarify the method by which such Guaranteed Payment is calculated; and 
 WHEREAS, the
Limited Partner agrees to such increase and clarification; and 
 WHEREAS, the General Partner and Limited Partner desire to amend the
Agreement to accomplish the same; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and for other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending legally to be bound, hereby agree as follows: 
 1.
The first sentence of the definition of “Guaranteed Payment” is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: “Guaranteed Payment” means an amount equal to the product of (x) 9.0 percent (on a quarterly basis)
and (y) the invested capital (as hereinafter defined) as of the last day of a calendar quarter of the Partner to whom a Guaranteed Payment is being made under Section 5.2.” 
 2. The definition of “Guaranteed Payment” is hereby further amended by adding to the end thereof the following: “It is the intent hereof
that Guaranteed Payments shall be determined on the basis of invested capital as the same may change from time to time. Accordingly, to the extent the same has not previously been done, the invested capital in item (y) of the first sentence of
this definition shall be changed each quarter, as necessary, starting with the last calendar quarter of 2006, to reflect any changes in the cash and Net Asset Value of the assets of the Partnership as of the date of each calculation of a Guaranteed
Payment.” 







 3. Except as herein amended, the Agreement is hereby ratified, confirmed and reaffirmed for all purposes
and in all respects. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the General Partner and Limited Partner have executed this Third Amendment effective for all
purposes as of the date first above written. 
  

			
	GENERAL PARTNER:
	
	SAUL CENTERS, INC., a Maryland corporation
		
	By:	 	 /s/

	Name:	 	 B. Francis Saul III

	Title:	 	 President



  

			
	LIMITED PARTNER:
	
	SAUL HOLDINGS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
	By: Saul Centers, Inc., general partner
		
	By:	 	 /s/

	Name:	 	 B. Francis Saul III

	Title:	 	 President
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4157 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

At Ease Sustainment LLC ) ASBCA No. 63083

)

Under Contract No. SPE1C1-21-D-1421 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Randy E. Kleinman, Esq.

 Gerstman Schwartz, LLP

 Garden City, NY

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Daniel K. Poling, Esq.

 DLA Chief Trial Attorney

Lindsay A. Salamon, Esq.

Kelly L. Diaz-Albertini, Esq.

Robert L. Kieffer, Esq.

 Trial Attorneys

 DLA Troop Support

 Philadelphia, PA

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

By email dated November 3, 2021, appellant filed a notice of appeal with the 

Board, which was docketed on November 8, 2021. Between August 23, 2022, and 

November 21, 2022, appellant failed to respond to several Board Orders directing 

appellant to submit its election of procedure. The Board sent each Order to the email 

address utilized by appellant to file its notice of appeal. Additionally, the Board 

attempted to contact appellant’s counsel via phone and left a message on December 19, 

2022. To date, no response has been received.

By Order dated December 22, 2022, appellant was directed, within 21 days, to 

either file its election of procedure or show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed 

for failure to prosecute. The Show Cause Order was distributed to the parties on

December 23, 2022, but appellant has not responded. Accordingly, the above appeal is

dismissed with prejudice under Board Rule 17.

Dated: January 24, 2023

(Signatures continued)

JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals
2

I concur

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD

Administrative Judge

Vice Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

I concur

OWEN C. WILSON

Administrative Judge

Vice Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63083, Appeal of At Ease 

Sustainment LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: January 24, 2023

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals