alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except under the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 31006 Su m m ar y Cal endar
UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee
v. R O N A L D T H O M P S O N , J R ., D e fe nda nt
- Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f ort he E as t er n D i st r i c tof Loui si ana U SD C N o. 2: 05- C R

- 257- 1
B ef ore B E N AV ID E S , P R A D O an d S O U T H W IC K , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * The Fed e r alPubl i c D e fe nde ra pp oi n t e d t o r e pr e s e nt Rona l d Tho m ps o n, J r. , h a s m ov ed f

or leav e to w i th d ra w an d h a s f i l ed a b ri ef i n a c c ord a n ce w i th A n d er s v . Ca lif

o rn ia , 3 86 U
. S. 7 38 ( 19 67 )
. Thom ps o n has f i l e d a r e s po ns e . O ur i n dep en den trevi ew of t h e rec ord, coun sel ’ s bri e f, an d T h om pson ’ s r espon se di scl oses n o non f

rivo lou s i ssue f

or app eal
. A ccor di n gl y, coun sel ’ s m ot i on f or l eave t o w i t h draw i s G R A N T E D , coun seli s excused f rom f u rt h er r espon sibi l i t i es h e r e in , a n d th e A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D
. S ee5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D September

18, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
510P04-2

#### State v. Jose Luis Macias

1. Defs *Pro Se*Motion for Petition for Writ of Error

1. Denied 09/02/2015

2. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion to Proceed *In Forma Pauperis*

2. Allowed 09/02/2015

3. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion to Appoint Counsel

3. Dismissed as moot 09/02/2015
To: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0215, EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0451

From: Hillary Ward, USEPA/OAQPS Subject: Federalism Outreach under Executive Order 13132 f or MSW Landfills

Date: July 2015

On April 15, 2015, the EPA conducted a Federalism C onsultation Outreach Meeting for associations that represent local and state elected officials potenti ally affected by EPA’s review of MSW landfill regulations. Participants included the National Conference of St ate Legislatures, the National League of Cities, th e U.S. Conference of Mayors, the National Association of Counties, the Environmental Council of States, National Association of Clean Air Agencies, and the Association of State and Territorial Solid Waste Management Officials. Appendix A to this memorandum contains the March 31 , 2015 invitation letter sent to invite participant s to the outreach meeting.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 23

- 00021

- CR

A USTIN K ENNETH C HURKEY

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from Criminal District Court

No. 2

of Tarrant County ( 1523478D )

December 14, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SEC O ND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dana Womack

Justice Dana Womack
# Pedestrian Gate Closing & L'Enfant Shuttle Ceasing Operations March 23

/ Published March 19, 2015

Please be aware that starting on March 23, 2015, the pedestrian gate, also known as the Eisenhower Gate, will be closing.  This is in conjunction with the Navy shuttle from L’Enfant Plaza ceasing operation on the same date.

Students using public transportation to L’Enfant Plaza have the following options:
- Walk the 1.5 miles from L’Enfant Plaza to the Ft. McNair ceremonial gate on P St. (CAC card required for entry), or to the Visitor’s Gate at 2 nd  SW & Q St SW.
- Take the Green Line Metro to Waterfront Station and walk the 0.7 miles to  Ft. McNair.
- From L’Enfant Plaza, take the V7 bus departing from D & 7 th  STs, towards DEANWOOD Station. Disembark at M St. and Delaware Ave. Walk the 0.51 miles to Ft. McNair. The fare is $0.85 with a Smartcard or $1.75 in cash.
- From L’Enfant Plaza, take the 74 bus departing from 7 th  St & C St., towards NATIONALS PARK. Disembark at Delaware Ave. and Canal St. Walk the 0.32 miles to Ft. McNair. The fare is $0.85 with a Smartcard or $1.75 in cash.
-  Taxi Cabs are generally available at L’Enfant Plaza as well.

As always, if you drive your own vehicle, parking is free & available on base adjacent to both Lincoln Hall and Marshall Hall in several base parking lots. If any changes are made to the transportation situation, students will be notified.

For more specifics regarding Metro Transportation, go to http://www.wmata.com/

iCollege Office of Student Services 

National Defense University

Ft. McNair, DC  20319
No. 11-8879.

#### Arafet *v.*Connolly, Superintendent, Fishkill Correctional Facility.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4921

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a deduction for

certain adoption expenses.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 8, 1994

Mrs. LOWEY (for herself and Mr. WYDEN) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a

deduction for certain adoption expenses.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DEDUCTION FOR CERTAIN ADOPTION EX4 PENSES.

5 (a) GENERAL RULE.—Part VII of subchapter B of

6 chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating

7 to additional itemized deductions for individuals) is

8 amended by redesignating section 220 as section 221 and

9 inserting after section 219 the following new section:
2

•HR 4921 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 220. CERTAIN ADOPTION EXPENSES.

2 ‘‘(a) ALLOWANCE OF DEDUCTION.—In the case of an

3 individual, there shall be allowed as a deduction for the

4 taxable year the amount of the qualified adoption expenses

5 paid or incurred by the taxpayer during such taxable year.

6 ‘‘(b) LIMITATIONS.—

7 ‘‘(1) MAXIMUM DOLLAR AMOUNT.—The aggre8 gate amount of adoption expenses which may be

9 taken into account under subsection (a) with respect

10 to the adoption of a child shall not exceed $2,500.

11 ‘‘(2) DENIAL OF DOUBLE BENEFIT.—

12 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—No deduction shall be

13 allowable under subsection (a) for any expense

14 for which a deduction or credit is allowable

15 under any other provision of this chapter.

16 ‘‘(B) GRANTS.—No deduction shall be al17 lowable under subsection (a) for any expenses

18 paid from funds received under any Federal,

19 State, or local program.

20 ‘‘(c) QUALIFIED ADOPTION EXPENSES.—For pur21 poses of this section, the term ‘qualified adoption ex22 penses’ means reasonable and necessary adoption fees,

23 court costs, attorneys fees, and other expenses which are

24 directly related to the legal adoption of a child by the tax25 payer and which are not incurred in violation of State or

26 Federal law.’’
3

•HR 4921 IH

1 (b) DEDUCTION ALLOWED WHETHER OR NOT TAX2 PAYER ITEMIZES OTHER DEDUCTIONS.—Subsection (a)

3 of section 62 of such Code is amended by inserting after

4 paragraph (15) the following new paragraph:

5 ‘‘(16) ADOPTION EXPENSES.—The deduction

6 allowed by section 220.’’

7 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

8 for such part VII is amended by striking the last item

9 and inserting the following new items:

‘‘Sec. 220. Certain adoption expenses.

‘‘Sec. 221. Cross reference.’’

10 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

11 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

12 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
§ 87.189 Requirements for public correspondence equipment and operations. ( a ) Transmitters used for public correspondence by aircraft stations in the maritime mobile frequency bands must be authorized by the Commission in conformity with part 80 of this chapter.
( b ) Transmitters used for public correspondence by aircraft stations in the Aeronautical Mobile-Satellite (R) or Maritime Mobile-Satellite frequencies must be certificated by the Commission in conformity with part 87. Aircraft earth stations that are required to be commissioned to use a privately owned satellite system also must meet the provisions of § 87.51.
( c ) A continuous watch must be maintained on the frequencies used for safety and regularity of flight while public correspondence communications are being handled. For aircraft earth stations, this requirement is satisfied by compliance with the priority and preemptive access requirements of § 87.187(q).
( d ) All communications in the Aeronautical Mobile Service and the Aeronautical Mobile-Satellite (R) Service have priority over public correspondence.
( e ) Transmission of public correspondence must be suspended when such operation will delay or interfere with message pertaining to safety of life and property or regularity of flight, or when ordered by the captain of the aircraft.
[53 FR 28940, Aug. 1, 1988, as amended at 57 FR 45750, Oct. 5, 1992; 63 FR 36608, July 7, 1998; 69 FR 32884, June 14, 2004]
EXHIBIT 31.1 

 

CERTIFICATION 

 

I, Peter van Stolk, certify that: 

 

1. I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Jones Soda Co. 

 

2. Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report. 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b. evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c. disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting. 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):

 

a. all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Dated as of November 9, 2005.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Petitions for Rehearing & Rehearing En Banc - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"HGyQkPiuBt\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/case-information\/case-filings\/petitions-for-rehearing-rehearing-en-banc\/\">Petitions for Rehearing & Rehearing En Banc<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/case-information\/case-filings\/petitions-for-rehearing-rehearing-en-banc\/embed\/#?secret=HGyQkPiuBt\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Petitions for Rehearing & Rehearing En Banc” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"HGyQkPiuBt\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"The Clerk’s Office has prepared the following guidance to litigants concerning the filing of either a petition for rehearing or a petition for hearing or rehearing en banc at the Federal Circuit. Please consult\u00a0Federal Circuit Rule 40 (Petitions for Rehearing) and Federal Circuit Rule 35 (Petitions for Hearing or Rehearing En Banc)\u00a0for additional information and […]"}
#### § 5.91 Notification to the National Radio Astronomy Observatory.

In order to minimize possible harmful interference at the National Radio Astronomy Observatory site located at Green Bank, Pocahontas County, West Virginia, and at the Naval Radio Research Observatory site at Sugar Grove, Pendleton County, West Virginia, any applicant for an Experimental Radio Service station authorization other than a mobile, temporary base, or temporary fixed station, within the area bounded by 39°15′ N on the north, 78°30′ W on the east, 37°30′ N on the south and 80°30′ W on the west shall, at the time of filing such application with the Commission, simultaneously notify the Director, National Radio Astronomy Observatory, P.O. Box NZ2, Green Bank, West Virginia 24944, in writing, of the technical particulars of the proposed station. Such notification shall include the geographical coordinates of the antenna, antenna height, antenna directivity if any, frequency, type of emission, and power. In addition, the applicant shall indicate in its application to the Commission the date notification was made to the Observatory. After receipt of such applications, the Commission will allow a period of twenty (20) days for comments or objections in response to the notifications indicated. If an objection to the proposed operation is received during the twenty-day period from the National Radio Astronomy Observatory for itself or on behalf of the Naval Radio Research Observatory, the Commission will consider all aspects of the problem and take whatever action is deemed appropriate.
Exhibit 23 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Directors 

PFF Bancorp, Inc: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statement (Nos. 333-138201, 333-120113, and 333-20337) on Form S-8 of PFF Bancorp, Inc. of our reports dated May 30, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of PFF Bancorp, Inc. as of March 31, 2007 and 2006, andthe related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive earnings, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows, for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2007, management’s assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2007 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2007, which reports appear in the March 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K of PFFBancorp, Inc. Our report refers to changes in accounting for share based payment in 2006. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Los Angeles, California 

May 30, 2007
#### HUNTER-WILSON DISTILLING COMPANY, Inc. v. FOUST DISTILLING COMPANY, Appellant.

No. 10353.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Feb. 9, 1951.

Decided Feb. 26, 1951.

William Hoffenberg, Baltimore, Md. (Mark T. Milnor, Harrisburg, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Douglass D. Storey, Harrisburg, Pa. (Herbert Levy, Baltimore, Md., Douglass D. Storey, Storey & Bailey, Harrisburg, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

*146Before KALODNER, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

*The*defendant appeals from a judgment entered against it settling issues of damages. The defendant’s liability was previously concluded by decision of this Court, 3 Cir., 181 F.2d 543. Upon examination of the record, we are of the opinion that the determination of damages made by the District Court is consistent with' our mandate, and we find no reason for reversal. The plaintiff, however, has conceded that there is reflected in the judgment appealed from a duplication of damages to the extent of $196.00. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court will be modified by reducing the principal sum awarded to the plaintiff by $196.00, and as so modified will be affirmed. Each party will bear its own costs of this appeal.
§ 80.957 Principal operating position. ( a ) The principal operating position of the radiotelephone installation must be on the bridge, convenient to the conning position.
( b ) When the radiotelephone station is not located on the bridge, operational control of the equipment must be provided at the location of the radiotelephone station and at the bridge operating position. Complete control of the equipment at the bridge operating position must be provided.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer of


Commercial
      National Financial Corporation


Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
      connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Commercial National Financial
      Corporation (the “Corporation”) for the period ending December 31, 2006 (the
“Report”), I, Thomas D. Watters, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
                15 (d) of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Commercial
                National Financial Corporation.








/s/
                Thomas D. WattersThomas
                D. WattersChief
                Financial OfficerMarch
                27, 2007








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Commercial National Financial Corporation and will be retained by Commercial
      National Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 95.1911 License requirements. ( a ) Each 218-219 MHz Service system must be licensed in accordance with part 1, subpart F of this chapter.
( b ) Each CTS where the antenna does not exceed 6.1 meters (20 feet) above ground or an existing structure (other than an antenna structure) and is outside the vicinity of certain receiving locations (*see* § 1.924 of this chapter) is authorized under the 218-219 MHz System license. All other CTSs must be individually licensed.
( c ) All CTSs not meeting the licensing criteria under paragraph (b) of this section are authorized under the 218-219 MHz Service system license.
( d ) Each component RTU in a 218-219 MHz Service system is authorized under the system license or, if associated with an individually licensed CTS, under that CTS license.
( e ) Each CTS (regardless of whether it is individually licensed) and each RTU must be in compliance with the Commission's environmental rules (see part 1, subpart I of this chapter) and the Commission's rules pertaining to the construction, marking and lighting of antenna structures (*see* part 17 of this chapter).
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
following Registration Statements:



| | 1. | Registration Statement (Form S-8) 333-127435 pertaining to the Staktek Holdings, Inc. 2003 Stock Option Plan and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Registration Statement (Form S-8) 333-125853 pertaining to the Staktek Holdings, Inc. 2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan;
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our report dated February 15, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Staktek Holdings, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 2005.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Austin, Texas

March 3, 2006
No. 11-9900.

#### Webster *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 95.329 How to contact the FCC.

For information about the Personal Radio Services, see the FCC's internet Web site (*www.fcc.gov*). To speak with an FCC representative about the Personal Radio Services, call the FCC's information line 888-CALL-FCC (888-225-5322). To write the FCC about these services, address the Federal Communications Commission, Attention: Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at the address of the FCC's main office indicated in 47 CFR 0.401(a).

[82 FR 41104, Aug. 29, 2017, as amended at 85 FR 64411, Oct. 13, 2020]
§ 80.318 Use of alarm signals. ( a ) The radiotelegraph or radiotelephone alarm signal, as appropriate, must only be used to announce: ( 1 ) That a distress call or message is about to follow;
( 2 ) The transmission of an urgent cyclone warning. In this case the alarm signal may only be used by coast stations authorized by the Commission to do so; or
( 3 ) The loss of a person or persons overboard. In this case the alarm signal may only be used when the assistance of other ships is required and cannot be satisfactorily obtained by the use of the urgency signal only, but the alarm signal must not be repeated by other stations. The message must be preceded by the urgency signal.
( b ) In cases described in paragraphs (a)(2) and (3) of this section, the transmission of the warning or message by radiotelegraphy must not begin until two minutes after the end of the radiotelegraph alarm signal.