alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Under 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 10, 2006, two proposed Consent Decrees in the case of                     *United States*                     v.                     *Midland Refining Company, Inc., Clear Water Trucking Company, Inc., Rosann Harpster, and Lewis W. Williams, Jr.,*                     Civil Action No. 06-1200-JTM, has been lodged with the United States District Court for the District of  Kansas.                

The Complaint sought the recovery of costs incurred in connection with response actions taken by the United States Environmental Protection Agency at the 57th and North Broadway Superfund Site in Wichita, Kansas.

Under the terms of the first Consent Decree (the Midland Consent Decree), Midland Refining Company, Inc., Clear Water Trucking, Inc., and Rosann Harpster will make payments to the United States totaling $79,000. Under the terms of the second Consent Decree (the Williams Consent Decree), Lewis W. Williams, Jr. will make payments to the United States totaling $110,000.03, and will make additional payments of a percentage of the gross income derived from certain “Property” as defined in the Consent Decree. In exchange, the United States will provide a covenant not to sue and contribution protection to all of the Defendants.

                    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) days from the date of this publication comments                     Start Printed Page 47831                    relating to the Consent Decrees. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611, and should refer to                     *United States*                     v.                     *Midland Refining Company, Inc., et al.,*                     Civil Action No. 06-1200-JTM (D. Kan.), D.J. Ref. 90-11-3-1737/1.                

                    During the public comment period, the Consent Decrees may be examined on the following Department of Justice Web site:                     *http://www.usdoj.gov/​enrd/​open.html.*                     Copies of the Consent Decree may also be obtained by mail from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611, or by faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia Fleetwood (                    *tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov*), fax no. (202) 514-0097, phone confirmation number (202) 514-1547. In requesting a copy from the Consent Decree Library, please enclose a check in the amount of $6.75 for the Midland Consent Decree, in the amount of $8.50 for the Williams Consent Decree, or in the amount of $15.25 for both Consent Decrees (25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the United States Treasury.                

Robert E. Maher, Jr.,

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division.

[FR Doc. 06-6992 Filed 8-17-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          82,789
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  215,891
<ALLOWANCES>                                    57,167
<INVENTORY>                                    648,957
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,048,899
<PP&E>                                         859,656
<DEPRECIATION>                                 691,665
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,945,056
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,676,050
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          2
<COMMON>                                        18,457
<OTHER-SE>                                      78,692
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,945,056
<SALES>                                        545,473
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               545,473
<CGS>                                          482,360
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  482,360
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,723,744
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             183,538
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,774,203)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,774,203)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,774,203)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.18)


</TABLE>
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P232Emerging Use of Force Issues: Balancing Public and Officer SafetyPublic perceptions of the use of force by law enforcement officers can dramatically and negatively affect the way the police and community interact. The International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) and the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (the COPS Office) convened a Use of Force Symposium to find ways in which law enforcement can address the perceived excessive use of force by officers. Discussions centered around five major themes, including public perception, getting at the facts, managing use of force, officer training, and officer mindset. Emerging Use of Force Issues: Balancing Public and Officer Safety summarizes the discussions from the symposium and provides suggestions and conclusions on what actions can be taken to address these issues.Categories: Police OperationsLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p232Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Apr 2012Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 02:29 (UTC-5) in 0.23 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. RANDY CARTER DAVIS

From Cleveland County

No. 132P15

ORDER

The pending motions and petitions in this case are resolved as follows: N.C.R. App. P. 27(c) provides that “[c]ourts may not extend the time for taking an appeal or for filing a petition for discretionary review.” For that reason, defendant’s “Motion to Deem Petition [and Notice of Appeal] Timely Filed” is denied, the State’s “Motion to Dismiss Defendant’s Notice of Appeal (Constitutional Question)” is allowed, and defendant’s “Petition for Discretionary Review” is dismissed. Defendant’s “Petition for Writ of Certiorari” is allowed in part and denied in part. Defendant’s “Petition for Writ of Certiorari” is allowed with respect to the issue of “whether the trial court erred in admitting the opinion testimony of witnesses Shukla and Chrysler.” Except as otherwise allowed, defendant’s “Petition for Writ of Certiorari” is denied.

By Order of the Court in Conference, this 5th day of November, 2015.

s/Ervin. J.

For the Court

WITNESS my hand and the seal of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, this the 9th day of November, 2015.

CHRISTIE S. CAMERON ROEDER Clerk of the Supreme Court

s/M.C. Hacknev Assistant Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jones Soda Co. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Hassan N. Natha, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------
|                        |  | 
|/s/ Hassan N. Natha     |  |  |  | August 14, 2006
|Hassan N. Natha         |  |  |  |                
|Chief Financial Officer |  |  |  |
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 169 (Thursday, August 31, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51856-51857]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7268]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Executive Office for Immigration Review

[EOIR No. 157]


Revised General Practice Regarding First Briefing Deadline 
Extension Request for Detained Aliens

AGENCY: Board of Immigration Appeals, Executive Office for Immigration 
Review, Department of Justice.

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice updates an earlier advisal of a revised general 
practice to be followed by the Board of Immigration Appeals regarding 
briefing deadlines for cases before the Board in which the alien is 
detained. The former notice stated that the additional time period 
granted for a first briefing extension will generally be reduced from 
21 days to 15 days, and the number of extension requests granted will 
generally be reduced from one per party to one per case. After further 
consideration, the 21 day briefing schedule will be retained. The 
number of extension requests granted per case, however, will still be 
generally reduced to one.

DATES: This notice is effective upon publication.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Chapman, Acting General Counsel, 
Executive Office for Immigration Review, 5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 
2600, Falls Church, Virginia 22041; telephone (703) 305-0470 (not a 
toll free call).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In an earlier notice, the Board of 
Immigration Appeals (Board) announced a change in its practice relating 
to briefing schedules in detained case. 71 FR 40151 (July 14,

[[Page 51857]]

2006). The commentary in that notice is incorporated herein by 
reference. In that notice, the Board stated that in cases involving 
detained aliens, it would henceforth normally grant only one extension 
request per case, as opposed to one extension request per party. It 
also reduced the amount of time generally granted for any briefing 
extension from 21 days to 15 days.
    The Board received comments from a large number of entities 
claiming that the reduction in the amount of time for briefing 
extensions would have a negative effect on detained aliens with respect 
to securing representation. In particular, the commenters argued that 
this would have an adverse impact on the Board's Pro Bono Project.
    The Board has reconsidered its policy change as to the amount of 
time granted for briefing extensions. The Board will continue to grant 
21 day briefing extensions. As advised in the prior Federal Register 
notice, however, the Board will change its practice regarding the 
number of briefing extensions granted, and will generally grant only 
one briefing extension per case when the alien is detained.

    Dated: August 22, 2006.
Lori Scialabba,
Chairman, Board of Immigration Appeals.
[FR Doc. 06-7268 Filed 8-30-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-30-M
#### § 80.1177 Assignment and use of frequencies.

On-board frequencies are assignable only to ship stations. When an on-board repeater is used, paired frequencies must be used. On-board repeater frequencies must be used for single frequency simplex operations. On-board frequencies are listed in subpart H.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000867443
<NAME> CAPITAL GAMING INTERNATIONAL, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       4,498,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,431,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,717,000
<PP&E>                                         131,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 108,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,721,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,726,000
<BONDS>                                     23,100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       400,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,721,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,150,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,881,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,885,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (6,818,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   336,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (7,154,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (7,154,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (3.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (3.82)
        


</TABLE>
No. 11-10088.

#### Salido-Rosas *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Description of 2006 Cash Bonus Plan



 EXHIBIT 10.43 
  
 DESCRIPTION OF 2006 CASH BONUS PLAN 
  
 On February 23, 2006, the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors approved the 2006 Cash Bonus Plan (the “2006 Plan”) for all of its full-time, salaried employees, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), Chief Operating Officer (“COO”), Executive Vice President
(“EVP”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”). Under the terms of the 2006 Plan, the CEO and COO are eligible to receive bonuses of three percent of the Company’s pre-tax, pre-bonus income, the EVP is eligible to
receive a bonus based on 3% of the Northern California Regions pre-tax, pre-bonus income after corporate allocation and  3/4 of
1% of the Company’s pre-tax, pre-bonus income (excluding the Northern California Region) and the CFO is eligible to receive a bonus based on a specified percentage of the Company’s pre-tax, pre-bonus income. Region presidents are eligible
to receive bonuses based upon specified percentages of their respective region pre-tax, pre-bonus income after corporate allocation, the president of the Company’s mortgage subsidiary is eligible to receive a bonus based upon the mortgage
subsidiary’s pre-tax, pre-bonus income if the mortgage subsidiary achieves a targeted profit amount, a targeted mortgage capture rate (subject to adjustment upward or downward if actual performance is above or below the target) and a targeted
customer service score (subject to adjustment upward or downward if actual performance is above or below the target), and all other participants are eligible to receive bonuses based upon specified percentages of salary or specified percentages of a
bonus pool determined as a specified percentage of pre-tax, pre-bonus income. 
  
 An employee’s right to receive a bonus under the 2006 Plan is generally conditioned upon his or her being actively employed by the Company or its divisions or subsidiaries on the date of payment. Awards will be
paid over two years, with 75% paid following the determination of the bonus awards, and 25% paid one year later, except for administrative staff bonuses and mortgage subsidiary bonuses which will be paid in full. The amounts payable one year later
are conditioned upon continued employment to the date of payment, except in the case of retirement, death or disability. 
  
 The maximum aggregate amount of awards under the 2006 Plan will not exceed 20% of the Company’s consolidated pre-tax income before bonuses.

  
 The Compensation Committee retains the discretion to increase
the bonus of a participant in the event of an extraordinary performance, or decrease it in the case of a substandard performance, and may make this determination on the basis of objective or subjective criteria, including, but not limited to, the
pay levels of executives at other major homebuilders.
#### § 80.313 Frequencies for use in distress.

The frequencies specified in the bands below are for use by mobile stations in distress. The conventional emission is shown. When a ship station cannot transmit on the designated frequency or the conventional emission, it may use any available frequency or emission. Frequencies for distress and safety calling using digital selective calling techniques are listed in § 80.359(b). Distress and safety NB-DP frequencies are indicated by footnote 2 in § 80.361(b).

| Frequency band | Emission | Carrier frequency |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1615-3500 kHz | J3E | 2182 kHz. |
| 118-136 MHz | A3E | 121.500 MHz. |
| 156-162 MHz | F3E, PON | 156.800 MHz 156.750 MHz. |
| 243 MHz | A3N | 243.000 MHz. |

The maximum transmitter power obtainable may be used.

[51 FR 31213, Sept. 2, 1986; 51 FR 34984, Oct. 1, 1986; 68 FR 46968, Aug. 7, 2003; 73 FR 4485, Jan. 25, 2008]
§ 73.6010 Class A TV station protected contour. ( a ) - ( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) A Class A TV station will be protected from interference within the following predicted signal contours: ( 1 ) 43 dBu for stations on Channels 2 through 6;
( 2 ) 48 dBu for stations on Channels 7 through 13; and
( 3 ) 51 dBu for stations on Channels 14 through 36.
( d ) The Class A TV station protected contour is calculated from the effective radiated power and antenna height above average terrain, using the F(50,90) signal propagation method specified in § 73.619(b)(1).
( e ) A digital Class A DTS station will be protected from interference within its Class A DTS protected area as defined by § 73.6023(d).
[86 FR 66213, Nov. 22, 2021, as amended at 86 FR 21227, Apr. 22, 2021; 89 FR 7263, Feb. 1, 2024]
Exhibit 10.36
                                  -------------

                             Escalade, Incorporated
                   Schedule of Executive Officer Compensation

         The compensation for the executive officers of Escalade, Incorporated
consists primarily of base salary, incentive profit sharing bonuses and stock
option grants.

Base Salary

         In general, base salaries are set at the beginning of each year based
upon the Company's income level generated in the prior year, any changes in the
level of responsibility and the subjective individual performance review
conducted by the Company's Compensation Committee. The 2007 base salaries for
the Companies executive officers are as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
            Name                        Position                                        Annual Base Salary
            ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                     <C>                                                  <C>
            Robert Griffin              Chairman of the Board                                $  53,500
            Daniel A. Messmer           President and Chief Executive Officer                $ 247,500
            Terry Frandsen              VP Finance, CFO                                      $ 181,500
</TABLE>

Bonuses

         Each of the Company's subsidiaries has an incentive profit sharing plan
where bonuses are primarily based upon the subsidiary's earnings before
interest, taxes and amortization (EBITA) return on equity and EBITA return on
assets. The Company's Compensation Committee establishes target levels for each
of these components for each subsidiary, based upon suggested levels provided by
management. If the target level is met or exceeded, a bonus pool is established
for payment to the subsidiary's employees and an additional 20% is payable to
the Parent Company executives. The Company in turn distributes such incentive
compensation to the Company's executive officers as determined by the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.

Stock Options

         Executive officers of the Company are also eligible to receive grants
of stock options pursuant to the Company's 1997 Incentive Stock Option Plan,
which was approved by the Company's shareholders. The Company's Compensation
Committee makes annual discretionary awards of stock options after consideration
of the performance of both the individual and the Company.

Additional Benefits

         The Company's executive officers are also eligible to participate in
the Company's deferred compensation plan, and earn interest annually on amounts
deferred under that plan. Executive officers also receive Company contributions
to their 401(k) retirement plan and the Company pays group term life insurance
benefits on their behalf.

                                       60
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4941

To repeal the Cuban Democracy Act of 1992.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 11, 1994

Mr. SERRANO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Foreign Affairs

A BILL

To repeal the Cuban Democracy Act of 1992.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF CUBAN DEMOCRACY ACT.

4 The Cuban Democracy Act of 1992 (22 U.S.C. 6001

5 et seq.) is repealed.

Æ