alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 160 (Friday, August 18, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 47868]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6994]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

Advisory Committee on the Readjustment of Veterans; Notice of 
Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that a meeting of the 
Advisory Committee on the Readjustment of Veterans will be held on 
September 7-8, 2006, at The American Legion, Washington Office, at 1608 
K Street, NW., Washington, DC from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. each day. The 
meeting will be open to the public.
    The purpose of the Committee is to review the post-war readjustment 
needs of veterans and to evaluate the availability and effectiveness of 
VA programs to meet these needs.
    The agenda for September 7 will review the coordination of services 
between VA and the Department of Defense as this relates to ensuring a 
seamless transition for returning war veterans. The topics covered will 
include deployment-related problems faced by service members and their 
families, and Battlemind Training as developed by the Walter Reed Army 
Institute for Research.
    On September 8 the Committee will be provided with an update on the 
current activities of the Readjustment Counseling Service Vet Center 
program to serve the veterans from Operation Enduring Freedom and 
Operation Iraqi Freedom. The agenda will also include a review of the 
partnership between VA and DOD in implementing the Post-Deployment 
Health Reassessment Program; strategic planning activities, and 
drafting recommendations for the Committee's next report to Congress.
    No time will be allocated at this meeting for receiving oral 
presentations from the public. However, members of the public may 
direct written questions or submit prepared statements for review by 
the Committee in advance to Mr. Charles M. Flora, M.S.W., Designated 
Federal Officer, Readjustment Counseling Service, Department of 
Veterans Affairs (15), 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420. 
Those who plan to attend or have questions concerning the meeting may 
contact Mr. Flora at (202) 273-8969 or [email protected].

    Dated: August 9, 2006.

    By Direction of the Secretary.
E. Philip Riggin,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 06-6994 Filed 8-17-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
```
#### § 27.1501 Definitions.

Terms used in this subpart shall have the following meanings:

*900 MHz broadband.* The 900 MHz broadband systems in the 897.5-900.5/936.5-939.5 MHz band licensed by the Commission pursuant to the provisions of this subpart.

*900 MHz broadband licensee.* An entity that holds a 900 MHz broadband license issued pursuant to this subpart.

*900 MHz broadband segment.* The segment of realigned 900 MHz spectrum (*i.e.,* the 897.5-900.5/936.5-939.5 MHz band) licensed by the Commission pursuant to the provisions of this subpart.

*900 MHz narrowband segment.* The segments of realigned 900 MHz spectrum (*i.e.,* the 896-897.5/935-936.5 MHz and 900.5-901/939.5-940 MHz bands (Paired channels 1-119 and 361-399)) designated for narrowband operations and licensed pursuant to 47 CFR part 90, subpart S.

*Complex system.* A covered incumbent's system that consists of 45 or more functionally integrated sites.

*County.* For purposes of this part, counties shall be defined using the United States Census Bureau's data reflecting county legal boundaries and names valid through January 1, 2017.

*Covered incumbent.* Any 900 MHz site-based licensee in the broadband segment that is required under § 90.621(b) to be protected by a broadband licensee with a base station at any location within the county, or any 900 MHz geographic-based SMR licensee in the broadband segment whose license area completely or partially overlaps the county.

*Eligibility Certification.* A filing made to the Commission as part of the prospective broadband licensee's application for a 900 MHz broadband license that demonstrates satisfaction of the eligibility restrictions.

*License area.* The geographic component of a 900 MHz broadband license. A license area consists of one county.

*Power spectral density (PSD).* The power of an emission in the frequency domain, such as in terms of ERP or EIRP, stated per unit bandwidth, *e.g.,* watts/MHz.

*Site-channel.* A channel licensed at a particular location.

*Transition plan.* A filing made to the Commission as part of the prospective broadband licensee's application for a 900 MHz broadband license that includes a plan for transitioning the band in the particular county.

*Transitioned market.* See section 90.7 of part 90 of this chapter.
#### § 15.245 Operation within the bands 902-928 MHz, 2435-2465 MHz, 5785-5815 MHz, 10500-10550 MHz, and 24075-24175 MHz.

(a) Operation under the provisions of this section is limited to intentional radiators used as field disturbance sensors, excluding perimeter protection systems.

(b) The field strength of emissions from intentional radiators operated within these frequency bands shall comply with the following:

| Fundamental frequency (MHz) | Field strength of fundamental (millivolts/meter) | Field strength of harmonics (millivolts/meter) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 902-928 | 500 | 1.6 |
| 2435-2465 | 500 | 1.6 |
| 5785-5815 | 500 | 1.6 |
| 10500-10550 | 2500 | 25.0 |
| 24075-24175 | 2500 | 25.0 |

(1) Regardless of the limits shown in the above table, harmonic emissions in the restricted bands below 17.7 GHz, as specified in § 15.205, shall not exceed the field strength limits shown in § 15.209. Harmonic emissions in the restricted bands at and above 17.7 GHz shall not exceed the following field strength limits:

(i) For the second and third harmonics of field disturbance sensors operating in the 24075-24175 MHz band and for other field disturbance sensors designed for use only within a building or to open building doors, 25.0 mV/m.

(ii) For all other field disturbance sensors, 7.5 mV/m.

(iii) Field disturbance sensors designed to be used in motor vehicles or aircraft must include features to prevent continuous operation unless their emissions in the restricted bands, other than the second and third harmonics from devices operating in the 24075-24175 MHz band, fully comply with the limits given in § 15.209. Continuous operation of field disturbance sensors designed to be used in farm equipment, vehicles such as fork lifts that are intended primarily for use indoors or for very specialized operations, or railroad locomotives, railroad cars and other equipment which travels on fixed tracks is permitted. A field disturbance sensor will be considered not to be operating in a continuous mode if its operation is limited to specific activities of limited duration (e.g., putting a vehicle into reverse gear, activating a turn signal, etc.).

(2) Field strength limits are specified at a distance of 3 meters.

(3) Emissions radiated outside of the specified frequency bands, except for harmonics, shall be attenuated by at least 50 dB below the level of the fundamental or to the general radiated emission limits in § 15.209, whichever is the lesser attenuation.

(4) The emission limits shown above are based on measurement instrumentation employing an average detector. The provisions in § 15.35 for limiting peak emissions apply.

[54 FR 17714, Apr. 25, 1989, as amended at 55 FR 46792, Nov. 7, 1990; 61 FR 42558, Aug. 16, 1996; 68 FR 68547, Dec. 9, 2003]
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350,

As Adopted
Pursuant

Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Matrix Service Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30,
2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin S. Cavanah, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|Date: September 8, 2011                   
|                                          
|/S/    Kevin S.
Cavanah                   
|Kevin S. Cavanah                          
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Dominion Homes, Inc. 2007 Director Compensation Plan



 EXHIBIT 10.22 
 DOMINION HOMES, INC. 
 2007 Director Compensation Plan 
  

	1.	Director Fees (paid quarterly in advance)* 

  

	 	(a)	$40,000 annual fee for each outside director ($10,000 per quarter) 

  

	 	(b)	Additional $5,000 annual fee ($1,250 per quarter) for: 

  

	 	•	 	 each Audit Committee member (other than Audit Committee Chair) 


  

	 	•	 	 the Compensation Committee Chair, and 


  

	 	•	 	 the Governance Committee Chair 


  

	 	(c)	Additional $10,000 annual fee for the Audit Committee Chair ($2,500 per quarter) 

  

	2.	Annual award of options to purchase 2,500 common shares of the Company (non-qualified). 

  

	3.	Reimbursement of expenses incurred in personal financial planning of up to $7,500 in any calendar year. 

  

	4.	Participation in Executive Deferred Compensation Plan – allows directors to defer receipt of their director fees and receive a matching contribution of 25% with respect to
those fees, not to exceed $2,500 in any year. 



	*	Directors receive 50% of their director and committee fees otherwise payable to them in common shares of the Company under the 2003 Stock Option and Incentive Equity Plan, and may
elect to receive up to 100% of their director and committee fees in common shares.
No. 11-5250.

#### Fillman *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 80.1007 Bridge-to-bridge radiotelephone installation.

Use of the bridge-to-bridge transmitter must be restricted to the master or person in charge of the vessel, or the person designated by the master or person in charge to pilot or direct the movement of the vessel. Communications must be of a navigational nature exclusively.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-50242

Conference Calendar

 

KEITH JUDD,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO; 

ALBUQUERQUE POLICE DEP'T; C. LEROY

HANSEN, U.S. District Judge for

the District of New Mexico, Albuquerque 

Division; LORENZO GARCIA, U.S. 

District Judge for the District of

New Mexico, Albuquerque Division; 

W.W. DEATON, U.S. Magistrate Judge

for the District of New Mexico, 

Albuquerque Division,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. MO-96-CV-122

- - - - - - - - - -

December 9, 1997

Before BARKSDALE, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

We must examine the basis of our jurisdiction on our own

motion if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th

Cir. 1987). When an action involves multiple parties or multiple
No. 97-50242

-2-

claims, any decision that adjudicates the liability of fewer than

all the parties or disposes of fewer than all the claims does not

terminate the litigation and is therefore not appealable unless

certified under FED. R. CIV. P. 54(b). See Thompson v. Betts, 754

F.2d 1243, 1245 (5th Cir. 1985); Borne v. A & P Boat Rentals No.

4, Inc., 755 F.2d 1131, 1133 (5th Cir. 1985). The district court

did not certify the order of dismissal of the federal judges for

appeal; and the order does not independently, or together with

related parts of the record, reflect the district court's clear

intent to enter a judgment under Rule 54(b). See Kelly v. Lee’s

Old Fashioned Hamburgers, Inc., 908 F.2d 1218, 1219-20 (5th Cir.

1990) (en banc). 

In addition, contrary to Judd's contentions, the "collateral

order" exception to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 is inapplicable. The order

dismissing the judges "is not collateral to merits, but rather

determines merits defenses, and it would be fully and effectively

reviewable on appeal if and when a final judgment is rendered 

. . . ." Exxon Corp. v. Oxxford Clothes, Inc., 109 F.3d 1069,

1070 n.2 (5th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, we are without

jurisdiction.

This appeal is frivolous, and it is a continuation of Judd's

pattern of frivolous filings. The appeal is DISMISSED. See

Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2. We caution Judd that any additional frivolous appeals

filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of
No. 97-50242

-3-

sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Judd is further cautioned to

review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise

arguments that are frivolous. 

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4677

To provide for monthly reporting of child support obligations to certain

consumer reporting agencies.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 29, 1994

Mr. LEVIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To provide for monthly reporting of child support obligations

to certain consumer reporting agencies.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MONTHLY REPORTING TO CERTAIN CONSUMER

4 REPORTING AGENCIES OF CHILD SUPPORT

5 OBLIGATIONS.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 466(a)(7) of the Social

7 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 666(a)(7)) is amended to read

8 as follows:

9 ‘‘(7)(A)(i) Procedures which require the State

10 agency to provide to each qualified consumer report-
2

•HR 4677 IH

1 ing agency, on a monthly basis, such information

2 (and in such form and in such manner) as the Sec3 retary shall require by regulation with respect to any

4 child support obligation owed by an absent parent to

5 any person being provided services under the State

6 plan approved under this part, except that informa7 tion with respect to overdue support payable shall be

8 made available under such procedures only after—

9 ‘‘(I) the State agency has transmitted to

10 the absent parent notice that the information is

11 to be so provided;

12 ‘‘(II) the absent parent has been given a

13 reasonable opportunity to contest the accuracy

14 of the information; and

15 ‘‘(III) full compliance with all procedural

16 due process requirements of the State.

17 ‘‘(ii) Clause (i) shall not be construed to require

18 the provision of more than 1 notice to an absent

19 parent with respect to child support payable by the

20 absent parent pursuant to a child support order.

21 ‘‘(B) As used in subparagraph (A), the term

22 ‘qualified consumer reporting agency’ means—

23 ‘‘(i) each consumer reporting agency (as

24 defined in section 603(f) of the Fair Credit Re25 porting Act) that is a major reporting agency
3

•HR 4677 IH

1 (as determined by the Secretary in regulations);

2 and

3 ‘‘(ii) at the option of the State, any other

4 consumer reporting agency (as so defined).’’.

5 (b) REGULATIONS.—Within 6 months after the date

6 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Health and

7 Human Services shall prescribe such regulations as may

8 be necessary to carry out the amendment made by sub9 section (a).

10 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

11 subsection (a) shall take effect 12 months after the date

12 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
282P08-3

#### State v. Farley L. Bernard

Defs *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Order of Superior Court of Wake County

Dismissed
#### § 27.1506 Frequencies.

The 897.5-900.5 MHz and 936.5-939.5 MHz band segments are available for licensing with an authorized bandwidth up to 3 megahertz paired channels. The 897.5-900.5 MHz segment must only be used for uplink transmissions. The 936.5-939.5 MHz segments must only be used for downlink transmissions.
**EXHIBIT31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Donald E. Brown, M.D., certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Interactive Intelligence, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

(a)  Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)  Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)  Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)  Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b)  Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| /s/ Donald E. Brown, M.D.             |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Donald E. Brown, M.D.                 |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| Date: May 10, 2005                    |

 

----
<PAGE>
                         [KPMG Letterhead]


                                                            Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors
Western Water Company:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-71616, 333-28759, 333-19595, 333-10367, 33-47606, 33-64750, 33-74278,
33-80137, and 33-80062) on Forms S-3 and S-8 of Western Water Company of our
report dated October 6, 2004, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Western Water Company and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2004 and 2003, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit),
and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31,
2004, which report appears in the March 31, 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Western Water Company.

Our report dated October 6, 2004, contains an explanitory paragraph that states
that the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations, has net
capital deficiencies, and is dependant upon uncommitted sales of Cherry Creek
Project Water Delivery Contract Units or other assets in order to generate
cash for operations, which raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability
to continue as a going concern.  The 2004 consolidated financials statements do
not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this
uncertainty.


                                             /S/ KPMG LLP

San Francisco, California
October 15, 2004
§ 76.1701 Political file. ( a ) Every cable television system operator engaged in origination programming shall maintain, and make available for public inspection, a complete record of a request to purchase cablecast time that: ( 1 ) Is made by or on behalf of a legally qualified candidate for public office; or
( 2 ) Communicates a message relating to any political matter of national importance, including: ( i ) A legally qualified candidate;
( ii ) Any election to Federal office; or
( iii ) A national legislative issue of public importance.
( b ) A record maintained under paragraph (a) shall contain information regarding: ( 1 ) Whether the request to purchase cablecast time is accepted or rejected by the cable television system operator;
( 2 ) The rate charged for the cablecast time;
( 3 ) The date and time on which the communication is aired;
( 4 ) The class of time that is purchased;
( 5 ) The name of the candidate to which the communication refers and the office to which the candidate is seeking election, the election to which the communication refers, or the issue to whih the communication refers (as applicable);
( 6 ) In the case of a request made by, or on behalf of, a candidate, the name of the candidate, the authorized committee of the candidate, and the treasurer of such committee; and
( 7 ) In the case of any other request, the name of the person purchasing the time, the name, address, and phone number of a contact person for such person, and a list of the chief executive officers or members of the executive committee or of the board of directors of such person.
( c ) When free time is provided for use by or on behalf of candidates, a record of the free time provided shall be placed in the political file.
( d ) All records required by this paragraph shall be placed in the political file as soon as possible and shall be retained for a period of two years. As soon as possible means immediately absent unusual circumstances.
( e ) Where origination cablecasting material is a political matter or matter involving the discussion of a controversial issue of public importance and a corporation, committee, association or other unincorporated group, or other entity is paying for or furnishing the matter, the system operator shall, in addition to making the announcement required by § 76.1615, require that a list of the chief executive officers or members of the executive committee or of the board of directors of the corporation, committee, association or other unincorporated group, or other entity shall be made available for public inspection at the local office of the system. Such lists shall be kept and made available for two years.
[65 FR 53621, Sept. 5, 2000, as amended at 83 FR 7631, Feb. 22, 2018; 87 FR 7755, Feb. 10, 2022; 87 FR 33441, June 2, 2022]