alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary 

The following Agreements were filed with the Department of Transportation under the Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures governing proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 days after the filing of the application. 

*Docket Number:*                     OST-2006-25604.                 

*Date Filed:*                     August 10, 2006.                 

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association.                 

*Subject:*                     TC31 South Pacific—Mail Vote 497, Passenger Revalidating Resolutions,                     *Intended Effective Date:*                     1 October 2006, (Memo 0188).                

*Docket Number:*                     OST-2006-25613.                 

*Date Filed:*                     August 11, 2006.                 

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association.                 

*Subject:*                     PTC12 USA-EUR 0199 dated 11 August 2006, Resolution 015h—USA Add-ons between USA and UK, (Memo                           ( print page 51885)                        0199),                     *Intended Effective Date:*                     1 October 2006.                 

Renee V. Wright,

Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. 06-7323 Filed 8-30-06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
No. 11-6152.

#### Newell *v.*United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit        23.5

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We        consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Form S-8 (No.        333-07377) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plans, in Registration Statement Form S-8        (No. 333-53400) pertaining to the Special Purpose Stock Option Plan, in Registration form        S-8 (No. 333-73000) pertaining to the 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, in Registration        Statement Form S-8 (No. 333-73002) pertaining to the 2000 Stock Option Plan and in        Registration Statement Form S-8 (No. 333-72998) pertaining to the 2001 Consultant Stock        Purchase Plan of SPAR Group, Inc., and with Respect to the December 31, 2006 consolidated        financial statements of SPAR Group, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K), for the        year ended December 31, 2007 of our report dated February 15, 2008 with respect to the        financial statements of UAB SPAR RSS Baltic, as of December 31, 2007 and for the years        ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.

 

|   | /s/ UAB “Rezultatas” |
|--------|----------------------------------|

 

Vilnius, Lithuania

February        15, 2008

 

Ex-5

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

[LOGO OF COOPERS & LYBRAND]

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registrations statement of
Pacific Gateway Exchange, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-24833) of our report
dated February 16, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements
and the financial statement schedules of Pacific Gateway Exchange, Inc. as of
December 31, 1997 and 1996, and for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996,
and 1995, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

                                                /s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

San Francisco, California
March 31, 1998


Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P. is a member of Coopers & Lybrand International, a Swiss
limited liability association.
No. 11-5615.

#### Williams *v.*Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM STERLING
COMMERCE, INC. FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         354,958
<SECURITIES>                                   183,451
<RECEIVABLES>                                  151,256
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               719,295
<PP&E>                                         131,932
<DEPRECIATION>                                  57,541
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 967,004
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          174,181
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           945
<OTHER-SE>                                     746,970
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   967,004
<SALES>                                        490,302
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               490,302
<CGS>                                           96,161
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  511,463
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,991
<INCOME-TAX>                                    64,147
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (61,156)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (61,156)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.67)
        

</TABLE>
October 10, 2014

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Operations, M-30

West Building Ground Floor,

Room W12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

To whom it might concern:

Hetrick Air Services is hereby filing for an extension of exemption to 49 CFR part 40 and 14 CFR part 120 

(formerly 14 CFR part 121, appendices I and J). 

Hetrick Air Services is requesting an extension of the ruling for exemption made in docket number FAA2013-0032. 

The reason for this request is that there is only one person that flies under the 91.147. Because our 

department is small, we do not believe having this group under a separate program warrants the 

additional cost and time to administer two separate programs. The program that covers our 135 

operator ensures the same level of safety and meets the same requirements of the program required 

for the 91.147. We do not believe that having the 91.147 under the same program as the 135 operator 

will compromise safety in any way. In addition, we have not had any positive drug or alcohol tests in our 

program during the last nine years; therefore, we do not believe allowing this exemption would not put 

our program at risk. 

You may reach me with questions at (785) 842-0000 or Lloyd@hetrickairservices.com.

Regards, 

Lloyd Hetrick

HR Manager/Drug-Alcohol Program Manager

Hetrick Air Services, Inc.

1930 Airport Road

Lawrence, KS 66044

(785)842-0000

(785)842-0569 fax

Lloyd@hetrickairservices.com
Jump to content

consumer.govwhat to know and do

MenuMenuChange menu visibility

## CG: Main Navigation

                          -  Managing Your Money 
                          -  Credit, Loans and Debt 
                          -  Scams and Identity Theft 
                          -  Toolbox 

Español

# Lesson Plans

#### Managing Your Money

#### Credit, Loans, and Debt

#### Scams and Identity Theft

## CG: Footer

                      -  Privacy Policy 
                      -  USA.gov 
                      -  Federal Trade Commission
§ 9.9 Definitions. Interconnection or Interconnected. Direct or indirect connection through automatic or manual means (by wire, microwave, or other technologies such as store and forward) to permit the transmission or reception of messages or signals to or from points in the public switched network.
*Interconnected service.* ( 1 ) A service: ( i ) That is interconnected with the public switched network, or interconnected with the public switched network through an interconnected service provider, that gives subscribers the capability to communicate to or receive communication from all other users on the public switched network; or
( ii ) For which a request for such interconnection is pending pursuant to section 332(c)(1)(B) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 332(c)(1)(B).
( 2 ) A mobile service offers interconnected service even if the service allows subscribers to access the public switched network only during specified hours of the day, or if the service provides general access to points on the public switched network but also restricts access in certain limited ways. Interconnected service does not include any interface between a licensee's facilities and the public switched network exclusively for a licensee's internal control purposes.
§ 80.114 Authority of the master. ( a ) The service of each ship station must at all times be under the ultimate control of the master, who must require that each operator or such station comply with the Radio Regulations in force and that the ship station is used in accordance with those regulations.
( b ) These rules are waived when the vessel is under the control of the U.S. Government.
§ 90.305 Location of stations. ( a ) The transmitter site(s) for base station(s), including mobile relay stations, shall be located not more than 80 km. (50 mi.) from the geographic center of the urbanized area listed in § 90.303.
( b ) Mobile units shall be operated within 48 km. (30 mi.) of their associated base station or stations. Such units may not be operated aboard aircraft in flight except as provided for in § 90.315(i).
( c ) Control stations must be located within the area of operation of the mobile units.
( d ) Base and control stations shall be located a minimum of 1.6 km. (1 mi.) from local television stations operating on UHF TV channels separated by 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, and 8 TV channels from the television channel in which the base station will operate.
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 6690

MARKESE D. RICE
,
Petitioner

- Appellant
,

v.

KENNETH DIGGS
, Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte

. Martin K. Reidinger
, Chief District Judge. ( 3:23

- cv

- 00355

- MR )

Submitted : December 29, 2023 Decided: February 23, 2024

Before QUATTLEBAUM and HEYTENS , Circuit Judges , and KEEN A N, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Markese D. Rice, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6690 Doc: 8 Filed: 02/23/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Markese D. Rice appeals the district court’s order construing his Fed. R. Civ. P.
60(b) motion for relief from judgment as an unauthorized, successive 28 U.S.C. § 2254
petition and dismissing it on that basis

. * Our review of the record confirms that the district
court properly construed Rice’s Rule 60(b) motion as a successive § 225 4 petition over
which it lacked jurisdiction because he failed to obtain prefiling authorization from this

court. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A); McRae , 793 F.3d at 397

- 400. Accordingly, we

affirm the district court’s order.

Consistent with our decision in United States v. Winestock , 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th
Cir. 2003), we construe Rice’s notice of appeal and informal brief as an application to file

a second or successive § 2254 petition. Upon review, we conclude that Rice’s claims do

not meet the relevant standard. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244( b)(2 ). We therefore deny

authorization to file a successive § 2254 petition.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* A certificate of appealability is not required to appeal the district court’s jurisdictional categorization of a Rule 60(b) motion as an unauthorized
, successive habeas petition. United States v. McRae , 793 F.3d 392, 400 (4th Cir. 2015). USCA4 Appeal: 23-6690 Doc: 8 Filed: 02/23/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
Docket Number: FAA-2014-0055

 Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? 

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 8/19/13 ---

Regional Airline Association 8/19/13 ---

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 8/19/13 ---

ATA M. Lopez 8/19/13 ---
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed November 

17, 2011.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-11-00971-CR

NO. 14-11-00972-CR

____________

IN RE ROBERT MORENO, JR., Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

263rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 0807407 & 0807408

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On November 7, 2011, relator Robert Moreno, Jr. filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. 

Relator complains that respondent, the Honorable Jim Wallace, presiding judge of the

263rd District Court of Harris County, has not ruled on his motion for post-conviction 

forensic DNA testing. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 64.01—64.05.

To be entitled to mandamus relief in a criminal case, a relator must show that he has 

no adequate remedy at law to redress his alleged harm, and that what he seeks to compel is 

a ministerial act, not involving a discretionary or judicial decision. State ex rel. Young v. 
2

Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Appeals at Texarkana, 236 S.W.3d 207, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2007) (orig. proceeding). Consideration of a motion that is properly filed and before the 

court is a ministerial act. State ex rel. Curry v. Gray, 726 S.W.2d 125, 128 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 1987) (orig. proceeding). A relator must establish the trial court (1) had a legal duty 

to rule on the motion; (2) was asked to rule on the motion; and (3) failed to do so. In re 

Keeter, 134 S.W.3d 250, 252 (Tex. App.—Waco 2003, orig. proceeding); In re Villarreal, 

96 S.W.3d 708, 710 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2003, orig. proceeding) (relator must show that 

trial court received, was aware of, and was asked to rule on motion). 

Relator has not provided this court with any evidence that his motion for DNA 

testing was properly filed with the trial court and presented to the judge for a ruling. It is 

relator’s burden to provide this court with a record sufficient to establish his right to relief. 

Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992); Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(k), 52.7(a). 

Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Anderson and Christopher.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 169 (Thursday, August 31, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51830-51831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7367]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families


Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation; Grant to the 
Institute for American Values

AGENCY: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, ACF, HHS.

ACTION: Award announcement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    C.F.D.A. Number: 93.647.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Office of Planning, Research 
and Evaluation will award grant funds without competition to the 
Institute for American Values. This grant is being awarded for an 
unsolicited proposal entitled, ``Gendered Parenting and Its 
Implications for Child Well-Being and Couple Relationships,'' that 
conforms to the applicable program objectives, is within the 
legislative authorities and proposes activities that may be lawfully 
supported through grant mechanisms. The study is unique and relevant to 
ACF's interest in increasing child well-being and supporting healthy 
marriage. The resulting products can be expected to benefit 
policymakers and others interested in family policy.
    The Institute for American Values is a nonprofit, nonpartisan 
research and education organization conducting

[[Page 51831]]

interdisciplinary research concerning issues of civil society.
    The grant will support an 18-month project at a cost of $96,000 in 
Federal support. The project is also being supported through non-
Federal funding sources.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Jakopic, Office of Planning, 
Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, 370 
L'Enfant Promenade, SW., Washington, DC 20447; phone: 202-205-5930.

    Dated: August 25, 2006.
Naomi Goldstein,
Director, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.
[FR Doc. 06-7367 Filed 8-30-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-P
#### § 73.4101 Financial qualifications, TV stations.

See Public Notice, FCC 79-299, dated May 11, 1979. 72 F.C.C. 2d 784; 44 FR 29160, May 18, 1979. *See also Revision of Application for Construction Permit for Commercial Broadcast Station (FCC Form 301),* Memorandum Opinion and Order, 50 R.R.2d 381, para. 6 (1981) and *Certification of Financial Qualification by Applicants for Broadcast Station Construction Permits,* Public Notice, 2 FCC Rcd 2122 (1987), 52 FR 17333 (May 7, 1987).

[89 FR 7262, Feb. 1, 2024]
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4615

To make applicable the provisions of the Act commonly known as the ‘‘Warren

Act’’ to the Central Utah Project, Utah, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 21, 1994

Mr. ORTON (for himself and Ms. SHEPHERD) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

A BILL

To make applicable the provisions of the Act commonly

known as the ‘‘Warren Act’’ to the Central Utah Project,

Utah, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. APPLICATION OF THE WARREN ACT.

4 (a) AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of the Interior

5 may—

6 (1) enter into contracts with private entities

7 pursuant to the Act of February 21, 1911 (com8 monly known as the ‘‘Warren Act’’) (36 Stat. 925

9 et seq., chapter 141; 43 U.S.C. 523), for the im10 pounding, storage, and carriage of nonproject water
2

•HR 4615 IH

1 for domestic, municipal, fish and wildlife, industrial,

2 and other beneficial purposes, using any facilities as3 sociated with the Central Utah Project, Utah; and

4 (2) enter into agreements, under terms and

5 conditions authorized for contracts under such Act,

6 with appropriate officials of other Federal agencies,

7 municipalities, public water districts and agencies,

8 and States for impounding, storage, and carriage of

9 nonproject water for purposes described in para10 graph (1) using facilities referred to in such para11 graph.

12 (b) NONPROJECT WATER DEFINED.—In subsection

13 (a), the term ‘‘nonproject water’’ means water that is not

14 from a Federal Reclamation project.

Æ
No. 11-9146.

#### Hardin *v.*United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
§ 80.507 Scope of service. ( a ) A private coast station or marine utility station using telephony serves the operational and business needs of ships including the transmission of safety communication.
( b ) In areas where environmental communications are provided by U.S. Government stations or by public coast stations, private coast stations and marine utility stations on shore must not duplicate that service. In other areas, private coast stations and marine utility stations on shore may transmit weather and hydrographic information required for the ships with which they normally communicate. Private coast stations may provide environmental communication service in areas where adequate service is not available.
( c ) Each marine utility station on shore must be operated as a private coast station except that it may be operated at temporary unspecified locations. Marine utility stations on ships are operated as ship stations.
( d ) Each private coast station is authorized by rule to use hand-held marine radios in the vicinity of the station's fixed transmitter site on those frequencies assigned to the private coast station. Hand-held communications must conform to those normally permitted under a marine utility station authorization and must be limited to contact with the associated private coast station and ship stations in the vicinity of the private coast station.
[51 FR 31213, Sept. 2, 1986, as amended at 62 FR 40307, July 28, 1997]
EXHIBIT 10.1

                            MASTER PURCHASE AGREEMENT
                            -------------------------

                                  BY & BETWEEN:
                                  -------------

              PALOMAR ENTERPRISES, INC. AND PRICE RIGHT AUTO GROUP
              ----------------------------------------------------

Palomar Enterprises, Inc. and/or its assignees, agree (on a funds available
basis) to provide up to a one million dollar ($1,000,000.00) purchase commitment
to Price Right Auto Group.
The terms and conditions are as follows:

     a.   Palomar Enterprises, Inc. will purchase secured 'packets' of auto
          contracts from Price Right Auto Group and/or affiliates
     b.   Price Right Auto Group is responsible for the collection, management
          and oversight (servicing) of each individual contract
     c.   In the event of default, Price Right Auto Group will replace new and
          viable contracts for any individual contracts that (may) default (of
          equal value)
     d.   Palomar Enterprises, Inc., retains the right to convert each and every
          note to common shares (see Exhibit 'B' that is attached to each
          individual packet)
     e.   Term is twelve months from the date of signing
     f.   Price Right Auto Group warranties a twelve (12%) annual rate of return
          on all purchased contracts
     g.   Each contract is understood to be for a term of (no longer then)
          twelve months and all payments are to be fully amortized and to be
          paid in twelve equal amounts.



/s/ Steve Bonenberger   06-07-04     /s/ Robert Simpson    6/07/2004
--------------------------------     -------------------------------
Steve Bonenberger,        (date)     Robert Simpson,          (date)
Palomar Enterprises, Inc.            Price Right Auto Group


<PAGE>