alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Norah Aguirre Gonzales de PEREZ and Ligia Vanesa Perez Aguirre, Petitioners, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-72375.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 15, 2004.*

Decided March 24, 2004.

Catalino Y. Dumlao, III, John R. Alcorn, Esq., Law Offices of John R. Alcorn, Irvine, CA, for Petitioners.

Regional Counsel, Laguna Niguel, CA, Los Angeles District Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Le-Fevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the *992District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Deborah N. Misir, Esq., DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before B. FLETCHER, LEAVY and WARD LAW, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Norah Aguirre Gonzales de Perez and her daughter Ligia Vanesa Perez Aguirre, natives and citizens of Bolivia, petition for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing their appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of their request for suspension of deportation. Because the transitional rules apply, see *Kalaw v. INS,*133 F.3d 1147, 1150 (9th Cir.1997), we have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a). We review constitutional challenges de novo, *Ram v. INS,*243 F.3d 510, 517 (9th Cir. 2001), and deny the petition.

Petitioners concede that they did not accrue seven years of continuous physical presence before the government served them with an Order to Show Cause, and that they are ineligible for suspension of deportation under the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act’s stop-time rule. Their challenge to the retroactive application of the Act to their case is foreclosed by *Ram,*243 F.3d at 518 (rejecting constitutional challenge to application of the stop-time rule).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         July 13, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         The Madison Hotel, 15th and M Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20005.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Alan L. Willard, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, NINDS/NIH/DHHS, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Suite 3208, MSC 9529, Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, 301-496-9223.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 23, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-16622  Filed 6-29-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### § 73.808 Distance computations.

For the purposes of determining compliance with any LPFM distance requirements, distances shall be calculated in accordance with § 73.208(c) of this part.
No. 11-6093.

#### Ocampo *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
# Shuttle from Coast Guard Bldg to Ft McNair Stops March 23

/ Published March 11, 2015
Please note that NDU has been informed that the shuttle which runs from L'Enfant Plaza to the Coast Guard Building on 2nd St SW (right outside the Fort McNair gate) will STOP this route on March 23, 2015.  Students and employees who use this shuttle to come to NDU and other business at Fort McNair will have to locate other means of transportation.  Also, the pedestrian gate from the Coast Guard Bldg to Fort McNair (closest to the marina) will close to foot traffic.  All persons wishing to enter Fort McNair will either have to come through the Main Gate on P Street (with a CAC card) or through the large Visitor Gate Entrance on 2nd Street SW.  Visitors without CAC must enter here and allow time for vehicle search.  This is a newly-implemented stepped-up security requirement.  All visitors must have valid, picture ID to enter base. Thank you.
#### § 73.4266 Tender offer and proxy statements.

See *Policy Statement,* MM Docket 85-218, FCC 86-67, adopted January 30, 1986. 51 FR 9794, March 21, 1986.

[51 FR 26251, July 22, 1986]
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.21A


                                FIRST AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                AMENDED AND RESTATED EXECUTIVE STOCK OPTION PLAN

     THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AMENDED AND
RESTATED EXECUTIVE STOCK OPTION PLAN is made effective as of July 16, 1996.

I. AMENDMENT TO SECTION 4: PLAN ADMINISTRATION

     Section 4 of the Catellus Development Corporation Amended and Restated
Executive Stock Option Plan is hereby amended by amending the first three
sentences of such Section 4 to read in their entirety as follows:


"The Plan shall be administered by the Compensation and Benefits Committee of
the Board, or any other committee designated by the Board (the "Committee"), or,
with respect to the grant of any Options to employees (other than an executive
officer as defined in Rule 3b-7 or Rule 16a-1 under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), a committee of one or more directors
who need not be a "disinterested person" within the meaning of Regulation 16b-3
("Regulation 16b-3") promulgated under the Exchange Act or an "outside director"
within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code")
and regulations issued thereunder to the extent the amount and terms of the
Option are duly authorized by the Committee.  Except as provided above, the
members of the Committee shall each be a "disinterested person" within the
meaning of Regulation 16b-3 and an "outside director" within the meaning of
Section 162(m) of the Code, and regulations issued thereunder.  Except with
respect to Options granted to nonemployee directors pursuant to Section 18 and
Options granted pursuant to the previous sentence, the Committee shall have the
sole authority to determine (a) to whom Options shall be granted under the Plan;
(b) the type, amount and terms of the Options to be granted; (c) the time when
Options will be granted and the duration of the exercise period; and (d) any
other matters arising under the Plan."
§ 80.131 Radioprinter operations. Radioprinter operations provide a relatively low cost system of record communications between authorized coast and ship stations in accordance with the following paragraphs. ( a ) *Supplementary eligibility requirement.* A radioprinter authorization for a private coast station may be issued to the owner or operator of a ship of less than 1600 gross tons, a community of ships all of which are less than 1600 gross tons, or an association whose members operate ships of less than 1600 gross tons.
( b ) *Scope of communications.* Only those communications which concern the business and operational needs of vessels are authorized.
( c ) *Assignment and use of frequencies.* ( 1 ) Frequencies may be assigned to private coast stations for radioprinter use from the appropriate bands listed in subpart H of this part.
( 2 ) Frequencies in the listed bands are shared with other radio services including the maritime mobile service. Each assigned frequency is available on a shared use basis only, not for the exclusive use of any one station or licensee.
( d ) *Coast station responsibilities.* ( 1 ) Private coast stations must propose frequencies and provide the names of ships to be served with the application.
( 2 ) Private coast station licensees must provide copies of their license to all ships with which they are authorized to conduct radioprinter operations.
#### § 64.1515 Recovery of costs.

No common carrier shall recover its cost of complying with the provisions of this subpart from local or long distance ratepayers.
RE: Clean Power Plan for Existing Sources

Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0602

I strongly support EPA's proposed rules limiting carbon emissions from existing power sources. It is important to me that the final rule for the Clean Power Plan explicitly list a carbon tax as an option for states to comply with the rule. Ideally this should be a revenue neutral carbon tax, with all revenues returned on an equitable basis to households as monthly dividends. Among economists, a carbon tax is widely accepted as the most economically efficient and cost-effective way to reduce carbon emissions. In a time when state budgets are tight, the most cost-effective option must be on the table as a mechanism for complying with the new rules. Though directed at reducing COG emissions, carbon taxes can also help states earn compliance for other fossil fuel byproducts regulated by the EPA such as particulates, mercury, NOx and SOx emissions. When a carbon tax is revenue-neutral, it can also yield a "double dividend": boosting the economy while also cutting carbon emissions. Modeling studies for California, Massachusetts, and Washington State have shown that a revenue neutral carbon tax will have a positive impact on the economy at the state level while also reducing carbon pollution. (http://etr-us.org/remi-studies/) At the national level a revenue-neutral carbon tax would have a correspondinglygreater positive impact (http://citizensclimatelobby.org/wpcontent/uploads/2014/06/REMI-carbon-tax-report-62141.pdf ) These modeling studies are supported by the practical experience of British Columbia, Canada, which shows that a sub-national jurisdiction that adopts a revenue-neutral carbon tax can lead in both economic indicators and carbon emissions reductions. The EPA should issue clear guidance on the administration, implementation, price, and escalation rate for a carbon tax that would satisfy the requirements of EPA's new rule. Thank you for the work you're doing to make our world a better place.

Chris Hoffman 1280 Fairfield Drive Boulder, CO 80305 hoopandtree@aol.com 303-494-8096 (home) 303-513-3621 (work / cell)
§ 73.4060 Citizens agreements. ( a ) See Report and Order, Docket 20495, FCC 75-1359, adopted December 10, 1975. 57 F.C.C. 2d 42; 40 FR ~~4~~59730, December 30, 1975.
( b ) See Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 78-875, adopted December 21, 1978. 70 F.C.C. 2d 1672.
[44 FR 58720, Oct. 11, 1979, as amended at 89 FR 7262, Feb. 1, 2024]
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Depomed, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tammy L. Cameron, Interim Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| | Date: March 12, 2008                                                    
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/TAMMY L. CAMERONTammy L. Cameron Interim Principal Accounting Officer

---



QuickLinks
#### § 8.207 Responsible party.

In the case of a complying consumer IoT product that has been granted authorization to use the FCC IoT Label, the applicant to whom that grant of cybersecurity labeling authorization is issued is responsible for continued compliance with the program requirements for continued use of the FCC IoT Label.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4885

Entitled, ‘‘the North American Border Stations Improvements Act.’’

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 2, 1994

Mr. DE LA GARZA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Public Works and Transportation

A BILL

Entitled, ‘‘the North American Border Stations

Improvements Act.’’

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION.

4 (a) AGREEMENTS.—The Administrator of the Gen5 eral Services Administration, subject to amounts provided

6 in advance in appropriations Acts, may enter into agree7 ments with State and local governmental units of private

8 corporations of the United States for the construction of

9 border stations on the borders of the United States with

10 Canada and Mexico. Agreements under this Act shall be

11 authorized only for facilities—
2

HR 4885 IH

1 (1) that meet applicable Federal Government

2 requirements for border stations; and

3 (2) that are located on sites approved by the

4 Commissioner of the United States Customs Service,

5 the Commissioner of the Immigration and Natu6 ralization Service, the Secretary of Agriculture, and

7 the Administrator of the General Services Adminis8 tration.

9 SEC. 2. TERMS OF AGREEMENTS.

10 (a) IN GENERAL.—An agreement entered into under

11 this Act shall provide for the acquisition of land and mate12 rials for the construction of border stations.

13 (b) TERMS AND LIMITATIONS.—

14 (1) LEASE AGREEMENT REQUIRED.—An agree15 ment entered into under this Act may provide for a

16 lease, with a term not to exceed 30 years.

17 (2) BORDER STATIONS.—This Act shall not

18 preclude existing corporate or privately owned bor19 der stations, and border stations owned by local gov20 ernmental units from making additions, modifica21 tions, replacements, and expansions of the port facil22 ity and its campus, which would necessarily allow for

23 an extension of the lease payment period subject to

24 the Administrator’s approval.
3

HR 4885 IH

1 (3) VESTED TITLE.—A lease agreement entered

2 into under this Act shall provide for the title to the

3 property and facilities to be vested in the ‘‘local gov4 ernmental unit’’ or in the instance of corporate or

5 privately owned facilities in the corporation or indi6 viduals.

7 SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS.

8 For purposes of this Act, the term ‘‘local govern9 mental unit’’ means—

10 (1) a county, city or other local government;

11 (2) a bridge board, port authority, or other en12 tity established by a State or local government; and

13 (3) any combination of those governments and

14 entities.

Æ
Editorial Note on Part 74
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 74 appear at 64 FR 4055, Jan. 27, 1999.

§ 74.5 Cross reference to rules in other parts. Certain rules applicable to Auxiliary, Special Broadcast and other Program Distribution services, some of which are also applicable to other services, are set forth in the following parts of the FCC Rules and Regulations: ( a ) Part 1, “Practice and procedure”. ( 1 ) Subpart A, “General Rules of Practice and Procedure”. (§§ 1.1 to 1.117).
( 2 ) Subpart B, “Hearing Proceedings”. (§§ 1.201 to 1.364).
( 3 ) Subpart C, “Rulemaking Proceedings”. (§§ 1.399 to 1.430).
( 4 ) Subpart F, “Wireless Telecommunications Services Applications and Proceedings”. (§§ 1.901 to 1.981).
( 5 ) Subpart G, “Schedule of Statutory Charges and Procedures for Payment”. (§§ 1.1101 to 1.1120).
( 6 ) Subpart H, “Ex Parte Presentations”. (§§ 1.1200 to 1.1216).
( 7 ) Subpart I, “Procedures Implementing the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969”. (§§ 1.1301 to 1.1319).
( 8 ) Subpart T, “Foreign Ownership of Broadcast, Common Carrier, Aeronautical En Route, and Aeronautical Fixed Radio Station Licensees”. (§§ 1.5000 to 1.5004).
( 9 ) Part 1, Subpart W of the chapter, “FCC Registration Number”. (§§ 1.8001-1.8005).
( b ) Part 2, “Frequency Allocations and Radio Treaty Matters, General Rules and Regulations”, including subparts A, “Terminology”; B, “Allocation, Assignments and Use of Radio Frequencies”; C, “Emissions”; D, “Call Signs and Other Forms of Identifying Radio Transmissions”; and J, “Equipment Authorization Proceedings”.
( c ) [Reserved]
( d ) Part 17, “Construction, Marking and Lighting of Antenna Structures”.
( e ) Part 73, “Radio Broadcast Services”.
( f ) Part 101, “Fixed Microwave Services”.
[53 FR 2499, Jan. 28, 1988, as amended at 60 FR 55482, Nov. 1, 1995; 66 FR 47896, Sept. 14, 2001; 68 FR 12761, Mar. 17, 2003; 76 FR 70911, Nov. 16, 2011; 78 FR 25174, Apr. 29, 2013; 81 FR 86613, Dec. 1, 2016]
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            College of Information and Cyberspace
                    National Defense University
                CIC
        Search
                    Search CIC:
                        Search
                Search CIC:
                    Search
    Home

    About 
        Mission & Vision

    Faculty & Staff

    Fact Sheet

    Alumni

    Internships

    FAQ

    Admissions 
        Eligibility Requirements

    Admissions Calendar

    Application Instructions

    Apply Online

    International Students

    Academics 
        Graduate Catalog

    M.S. in Strategic Information and Cyberspace Studies
        
        JPME Master's Degree

    Cyber Workforce Master's Degree (Part Time)

    Leadership Development Programs

    Graduate Certificates

    Academic Partners

    Current Students 
        JPME II  Incoming Students

    LDP Incoming Students

    Student Registration

    Bring Your Own Device

    IA Compliance

    Completion Procedures / Order Transcripts

    Student Services and Resources

    Events
    
        Cyber Beacon

    Cyber PME Colloquium

    Hopper Award

    Lecture Series

    CYBERCOM Symposium

    NEWS

    UC2
    
        About

    Events

    Work With Us

    Center for Cybersecurity
    
        About

    Cybersecurity Center POC

    Cybersecurity Supporting Faculty

    CAE-CDE CISO Certificate Program

    Cybersecurity Trending News

    Cyber Labs
        
        Ethical Hacking

    Critical Infrastructure - SCADA

    Cyber Exercises
        
        Tabletop Exercise

    Cyber Competitions

    Cyber Resources and Awareness

    Stakeholder / Industry Advisory Council

    Contact 
        Contact Us

    Directions

    Access to Ft. McNair

    Map of Ft. McNair  Home
  NEWS
  News & Announcements
 News & Announcements Download
 Details
 Share
 News
 Cyber Beacon 2021 By The Impacts of a Global Pandemic
                Cyber Beacon
 Watch most of CB 2021 on our YouTube channel here and read the Defense.gov article (National Cyber Director Unveils New Approach at Cyber War College Conference) here.
 SHARE
 PRINT
 National Defense University


College of Information and Cyberspace

300 Fifth Ave., Bldg. 62
Fort Lesley J. McNair
Washington, DC 20319-5066

202-685-6300
                    Stay Connected
                
                
                DOD Privacy & Security
 DOD Links Disclaimer
 DOD Social Media Policy
 DOD Web Policy
 FOIA
 NDU System of Records Notice
 NDU Privacy & Security Notice
 No FEAR Act
 Open GOV
 Plain Writing Act
 Section 508
 Small Business Act
 USA.gov
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4798 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4798

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
    coastwise trade for the vessel SPIRIT OF THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 19, 1994

  Mr. Tauzin introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
    coastwise trade for the vessel SPIRIT OF THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the 
Act of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106 of title 
46, 
United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue a 
certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for 
employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel SPIRIT OF THE PACIFIC 
NORTHWEST (United States official number 725338).
                                 <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 74

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 74 appear at 64 FR 4055, Jan. 27, 1999.

#### § 74.731 [Reserved]