alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          26,363                  30,681
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  165,046                 245,539
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               242,514                 341,266
<PP&E>                                       3,018,749               2,548,094
<DEPRECIATION>                                 611,407                 505,214
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,373,847               3,148,689
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          237,349                 181,501
<BONDS>                                        711,270                 853,134
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         1,044                   1,043
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,157,084               1,867,445
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,373,847               3,148,689
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               746,229                 778,892
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  487,354                 466,080
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,952                  17,571
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                267,346                 340,639
<INCOME-TAX>                                    78,867                 100,489
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            188,479                 240,150
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   188,479                 240,150
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.88                    2.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.87                    2.38


</TABLE>
§ 32.6565 Amortization expense—other. ( a ) This account shall include only the amortization of costs included in Account 2005, Telecommunications plant adjustment.
( b ) This account shall also include lump-sum write offs of amounts of plant acquisition adjustment as provided for in § 32.2005(b)(3) of subpart C.
( c ) Subsidiary records shall be maintained so as to show the character of the amounts contained in this account.
[69 FR 44607, July 27, 2004]
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1267 CAF 12-00007**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF SERENITY G.

------------------------------------------ ERIE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PETITIONER-RESPONDENT;

ORENA G., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

ALAN BIRNHOLZ, EAST AMHERST, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

JOSEPH T. JARZEMBEK, BUFFALO, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

DAVID C. SCHOPP, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (CHARLES D. HALVORSEN OF COUNSEL), FOR SERENITY G.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Patricia A. Maxwell, J.), entered December 6, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b. The order, among other things, transferred the guardianship and custody of the subject child to petitioner.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: In this proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b, respondent mother appeals from an order that, inter alia, terminated her parental rights with respect to the subject child on the ground of permanent neglect. We affirm. Initially, we note that the mother failed to preserve for our review her contention that Family Court erred in considering postpetition conduct prior to the dispositional hearing ( see Matter of Darren HH. [Amber HH.] , 68 AD3d 1197, 1198, lv denied 14 NY3d 703; Matter of “Baby Girl” Q. , 14 AD3d 392, 393, lv denied 5 NY3d 704).
Also contrary to the mother’s contention, petitioner established by clear and convincing evidence that she permanently neglected the subject child ( see Social Services Law § 384-b [3] [g] [i]; [4] [d]). It is undisputed that the child was removed from the mother’s care two days after her birth and was never returned to the mother’s care. Petitioner met its initial burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that it made the requisite diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the mother’s relationship with the child ( see § 384-b [7] [a]; see generally Matter of Star Leslie W ., 63 NY2d 136, 142; Matter of Rachael N. [Christine N.] , 70 AD3d 1374, 1374, lv**-2- 1267 CAF 12-00007** 

denied 15 NY3d 708). The mother thereafter failed to establish that she had a meaningful plan for the child’s future, including that she has addressed the problems that caused the removal of the child ( see Matter of Justain R ., 93 AD3d 1174, 1175; Rachael N. , 70 AD3d at 1374). Although the mother attended some of the parenting classes to which she was referred, petitioner presented evidence that she was “inconsistently applying the knowledge and benefits she obtained from the services provided[ and was] arguing with various service providers and professionals,” and petitioner thus established that the mother failed to articulate a realistic plan for the child’s return to her care ( Matter of Douglas H ., 1 AD3d 824, 825, lv denied 2 NY3d 701).

Entered: December 21, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with 35 U.S.C. 209(e) and 37 CFR 404.7(a)(I)(i), announcement is made of the intent to grant an exclusive, royalty-bearing, revocable license to U.S. provisional patent number 60/723,442 filed October 5, 2005 entitled “Small Molecule Inhibitors of Botulinum Neurotoxins,” to Microbiotix, Inc. with its principal place of business at 1 Innovation Drive, STE 15, Worcester, Massachusetts 01605-4332.

# ADDRESSES:

Commander, U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, ATTN: Command Judge Advocate, MCMR-JA, 504 Scott Street, Fort Detrick, Frederick, MD 21702-5012. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For patent issues, Ms. Elizabeth Arwine, Patent Attorney, (301) 619-7808. For licensing issues, Dr. Paul Mele, Office of Research & Technology Assessment, (301) 619-6664, both at telefax (301) 619-5034. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license can file written objections along with supporting evidence, if any, 15 days from the date of this publication. Written objections are to be filed with the Command Judge Advocate, U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, 504 Scott Street, Fort Detrick, Frederick, MD 21702-5012.

Brenda S. Bowen, 

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 06-6638 Filed 8-1-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
# John M. Carabello Award Presentation & CIO-LDP Graduation

/ Published Nov. 23, 2016

On Friday, November 18, 2016, fourteen (14) students from DoD, federal agencies, and several international partners graduated from the third cohort of the NDU iCollege Chief Information Officer Leadership Development Program (CIO LDP).  Students from the U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force, Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and  Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) were joined by international students from Oman, Czech Republic, Bulgaria, Ukraine and Romania.      

Mr. Tom Wingfield was presented with the John M. Carabello Award for his outstanding work as a member of the faculty where he gave a presentation on his work in the Ukraine and the difficulties a CIO faces there. The students then received their diplomas, and Mr. Willarvis Smith of DISA was named the CIO LDP Distinguished Leader, recognized for outstanding academic performance, demonstrated leadership, and exemplary personal conduct (as nominated by his fellow students and teaching faculty).       The CIO LDP is the iCollege’s flagship resident program for rising senior-level managers and leaders responsible for promoting and attaining national and international security goals through the strategic use of information and information technology. The CIO LDP is administered in a multi-week intensive, and highly interactive, student-centered educational experience emphasizing leadership skills and abilities. CIO LDP students form a learning community that fosters multiple perspectives on a wide range of issues.The CIO LDP curriculum provides participants with the Chief Information Officer certificate as well as course work toward the Master of Science in Government Information Leadership (CIO Concentration).
§ 80.1069 Maritime sea areas. ( a ) For the purpose of this subpart, a ship's area of operation is defined as follows: ( 1 ) *Sea area A1.* An area within the radiotelephone coverage of at least one VHF coast station in which continuous DSC alerting is available as defined by the International Maritime Organization.
( 2 ) *Sea area A2.* An area, excluding sea area A1, within the radiotelephone coverage of at least one MF coast station in which continuous DSC alerting is available as defined by the International Maritime Organization.
( 3 ) *Sea area A3.* An area, excluding sea areas A1 and A2, within the coverage of an INMARSAT geostationary satellite in which continuous alerting is available.
( 4 ) *Sea area A4.* An area outside sea areas A1, A2 and A3.
( b ) Maritime sea areas are delineated in the International Maritime Organization Publication GMDSS Master Plan of Shore-Based Facilities. The Master Plan can be purchased from the International Maritime Organization, 4 Albert Embankment, London SE1 7SR, United Kingdom.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 168 (Wednesday, August 30, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51579-51580]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7241]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[No. DOD-2006-OS-0109]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice. The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for 
clearance, the following proposal for collection of information under 
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by 
September 29, 2006.
    Title, Associated Form and OMB Number: Industrial Capabilities 
Questionnaire; DD Form 2737; OMB Control Number 0704-0377.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 12,800.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 12,800.
    Average Burden per Response: 12 hours.
    Annual Burden Hours: 153,600.
    Needs and Uses: The Industrial Capability Questionnaire will be 
used by all Services and the Defense Logistics Agency to gather 
business, industrial capability (employment labor skills, facilities, 
equipment, processes and technology), and manufactured item information 
to conduct required industrial assessments and support DoD planning and 
decisions. The questionnaires are directed at key industrial facilities 
supporting DoD requirements.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit.
    Frequency: Annually.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Hillary Jaffe.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Ms. Jaffe at the Office of Management and 
Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    You may also submit comments identified by docket number and title, 
by the following method:
    <bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency 
name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The 
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the 
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the 
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are

[[Page 51580]]

received without change, including any personal identifiers or contact 
information.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD/Information Management 
Division, 1777 North Kent Street, RPN, Suite 11000, Arlington, VA 
22209-2133.

    Dated: August 24, 2006.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 06-7241 Filed 8-29-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
#### § 80.393 Frequencies for AIS stations.

Automatic Identification Systems (AIS) are a maritime broadcast service. The simplex channels at 156.775 MHz (AIS 3), 156.825 MHz (AIS 4), 161.975 MHz (AIS 1), and 162.025 MHz (AIS 2), each with a 25 kHz bandwidth, may be authorized only for AIS. In accordance with the Maritime Transportation Security Act, the United States Coast Guard regulates AIS carriage requirements for non-Federal Government ships. These requirements are codified at 33 CFR 164.46, 401.20.

[82 FR 27213, June 14, 2017]
Safe Grain and Silage Handling*NIOSH Publication No. 95-109*

***DISCLAIMER:** Mention or implication of any company name or product does not constitute endorsement by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.*CONTENTS

*Safe Grain and Silage Handling Public Health Summary*

*About This Booklet . . .*
Section 1 - *Harvesting*
Section 2 - *Transportation*
Section 3 - *Storage*
Section 4 - *Conveying*
Section 5 - *Processing*
Authors and Acknowledgements
References

Go back to the NIOSH home pageor to the CDC home page.*This page was last updated on December 8, 1995.*
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4730 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4730

     To authorize issuance of a certificate of documentation with 
          appropriate endorsement for the vessel LADY ANGELA.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 12, 1994

    Mrs. Fowler of Florida introduced the following bill; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To authorize issuance of a certificate of documentation with 
          appropriate endorsement for the vessel LADY ANGELA.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
    Section 1. Notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 
1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the Act of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 
289), and sections 12106, 12107, and 12108 of title 46, United States 
Code, as applicable on the date of this Act, the Secretary of 
Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation with 
appropriate endorsement for the vessel LADY ANGELA (United States 
official number 933045).

                                 <all>
```
#### August Carstens, appellee, v. James W. Eller et al., appellants.

Filed June 19, 1895.

No. 5925.

Conflicting Evidence: Review. In this appeal is involved only a question of fact determined upon conflicting evidence by the district court. In such case the j udgment will not be reversed.

Appeal from the district court of Douglas county.. Heard below before Irvine, J.

*A. S. Churchill*and *J. W.*Eller, for appellants.

*Connell & Ives, contra.*

Ryan, C.

The appellee began this action in the district court of Douglas county for the foreclosure of a purchase money-real estate mortgage. The appellants, J. W. Eller and' Frances E. Eller, his wife, James W. Logan and his wife, who made the aforesaid mortgage, defended upon theground that the debt secured had been fully paid. The rights of Mary A. Putney and her husband are based on a subsequent mortgage to that on which foreclosure proceedings were begun, hence they need not be described more at length.

There is but one question material to the determination of this appeal, and that is whether a deed, in consideration-of $7,500 made by J. *W.*Eller and his wife, was delivered to and accepted by the appellee. If this fact existed, the-mortgage upon which foreclosure proceedings were begun was fully paid and appellee was not entitled to maintain his. action for the relief indicated. It is quite probable that the appellee and his wife agreed to accept the conveyance of the real property above referred to in full discharge of *516the balance clue upon appellee’s mortgage on a part of the property mortgaged. He, however, refused to accept of any payment or receive the deed tendered him until he had consulted his attorney with reference to the title which the proposed deed, when delivered and accepted, would vest in ¡him. Appellee, with Mr. and Mrs. Eller, thereupon together went to said attorney’s office and there Mr. Eller submitted the proposed conveyance and other papers for approval. The attorney for appellee, upon various pretexts, avoided passingupon thequestion submitted for his judgment and succeeded in deferring action until some indefinite day in the future. It is unnecessary to inquire how it happened. It is sufficient to state that after the meeting in the attorney’s office appellee refused further to proceed with his trade. There were various efforts upon the part of Mr. Eller to commit appellee to the terms doubtless previously assented to by Carstens, but without success, for the appellee insisted that he had not in law bound himself and did not propose so to do. When foreclosure proceedings were begun Mr. Eller, his wife, and their associates asserted that the deed, when submitted to Mr. Ives, the attorney of ap-. pellee, passed the title to said appellee for the reason alleged, that it was tendered and received as a conveyance. Upon this question, which was one of fact, it cannot be claimed that there was less than a conflict of evidence. The district court found adversely to the appellants. This finding was amply sustained by the proofs, and the judgment appealed from is therefore

Affirmed.

Irvine, C., not sitting.
---

EXHIBIT 15.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements on Form F-3 (N◦ 333-185071) and on Form S-8 (N◦
333-192208) of PolyMet Mining Corp. of our report dated April 21, 2015 relating
to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting which appears in PolyMet Mining Corp.s Annual
Report on Form 20-F for the year ended January 31, 2015.

(signed) PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Chartered AccountantsVancouver, British Columbia

April 21, 2015

---
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350


In connection with the Annual Report of ION Geophysical Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven A. Bate, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:


|   |                                                                                                                                      
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: February 9, 2018/s/ Steven A. BateSteven A. BateExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer