alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w10



 





Exhibit 10.10




LIN TV Corp.




Summary of Executive Compensation




     As of March 15, 2007, the 2007 base salaries of each of the named executive officers of
LIN TV Corp. were as follows:



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Name of Executive	 	Title of Executive	 	 	Base Salary	 
	Vincent L. Sadusky
	 	President and Chief Executive Officer	 	$	500,000	 
	Bart W. Catalane
	 	Sr. Vice President Chief Financial Officer	 	 	250,000	 
	Scott M. Blumenthal
	 	Executive Vice President Television	 	 	375,000	 
	Denise M. Parent
	 	Vice President General Counsel and Secretary	 	 	275,000	 
	Gregory M. Schmidt
	 	Executive Vice President Digital Media	 	 	400,000	 






     The 2007 target bonuses for each executive are established and outlined in more detail in
his or her employment agreement incorporated by reference as Exhibits to our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. The bonuses will be determined based upon the
achievement of certain strategic objectives, including performance targets and other subjective
factors.



     As of March 15, 2007, the 2007 target bonus of each of the executive officers of LIN TV Corp. was
as follows:



 









 





	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Name of Executive	 	Title of Executive	 	 	2007 Target Cash Bonus	 
	Vincent L. Sadusky
	 	President and Chief Executive Officer	 	$	500,000	 
	Bart W. Catalane
	 	Sr. Vice President Chief Financial Officer	 	 	150,000	 
	Scott M. Blumenthal
	 	Executive Vice President Television	 	 	200,000	 
	Denise M. Parent
	 	Vice President General Counsel and Secretary	 	 	150,000	 
	Gregory M. Schmidt
	 	Executive Vice President Digital Media	 	 	175,000
#### § 73.88 Blanketing interference.

The licensee of each broadcast station is required to satisfy all reasonable complaints of blanketing interference within the 1 V/m contour.

Note:

For more detailed instructions concerning operational responsibilities of licensees and permittees under this section, see [§ 73.318 (b)](/on/2024-09-20/title-47/section-73.318#p-73.318(b)), [(c)](/on/2024-09-20/title-47/section-73.318#p-73.318(c)) and [(d)](/on/2024-09-20/title-47/section-73.318#p-73.318(d)).

[[28 FR 13574](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/28-FR-13574), Dec. 14, 1963, as amended at [56 FR 64859](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/56-FR-64859), Dec. 12, 1991]
#### § 10.470 Roaming.

When, pursuant to a roaming agreement (*see* § 20.12 of this chapter), a subscriber receives services from a roamed-upon network of a Participating CMS Provider, the Participating CMS Provider must support WEA alerts to the roaming subscriber to the extent the subscriber's mobile device is configured for and technically capable of receiving WEA alerts.

[78 FR 16808, Mar. 19, 2013]
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 168 (Wednesday, August 30, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 51586]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7244]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army

[No. USA-2006-0014]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice. The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for 
clearance, the following proposal for collection of information under 
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by 
September 29, 2006.
    Title, Associated Form and OMB Number: International Military 
Student Information; DD Form 2339; OMB Control Number 0702-0064.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 3000.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 3000.
    Average Burden per Response: 15 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 750.
    Needs and Uses: The DD Form 2339 is required in support of 
international military students who are attending training in the 
United States with the Military Departments as part of the security 
assistance training program. The DD Form 2339 is utilized in gathering 
information on the international student prior to his/her arrival in 
the United States in order that civilian and military sponsors can be 
assigned to assist the student during his/her training.
    Affected Public: Individuals and households.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Hillary Jaffe. Written comments and 
recommendations on the proposed information collection should be sent 
to Ms. Jaffe at the Office of Management and Budget, Desk Officer for 
DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by the following method:
    <bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency 
name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The 
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the 
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the 
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without 
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information:
    DOD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings. Written requests for 
copies of the information collection proposal should be sent to Ms. 
Toppings at WHS/ESD/Information Management Division, 1777 North Kent 
Street, RPN, Suite 11000, Arlington, VA 22209-2133.

    Dated: August 24, 2006.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 06-7244 Filed 8-29-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
#### § 90.549 Transmitter certification.

Transmitters operated in the 758-775 MHz and 788-805 MHz frequency bands must be of a type that have been authorized by the Commission under its certification procedure as required by § 90.203.

[79 FR 600, Jan. 6, 2014]
Personnel Commission

No. 81-416

#### Appeal of William H. Oudens (New Hampshire Personnel Commission)

July 7, 1982

*Law Offices of Stanton E. Tefft,*of Bedford *(Stanton E. Tefft*on the brief), by brief for the plaintiff.

*Gregory H. Smith,*attorney general *{E. Tupper Kinder,*assistant attorney general, and *Eve H. Oyer,*attorney, on the brief), by brief for the New Hampshire Water Supply and Pollution Control Commission.

Batchelder, J.

This appeal arises from the New Hampshire Personnel Commission’s (personnel commission) refusal to grant a hearing to an employee who had been fired before the expiration of his probationary period of employment with the State.

On February 13, 1981, the plaintiff began working for the State Diagnostic Laboratories. Because of budget cuts, he was assigned on July 16, 1981, to a lower classified position in the New Hampshire Water Supply and Pollution Control Commission. On August 12, 1981, one day before his six-months’ probationary period was to end, he was terminated.

 Although a probationary employee ordinarily has no recourse when he is discharged, because a governmental unit has almost unfettered power to discharge a probationary employee, *Clark v. Manchester,*113 N.H. 270, 274-75, 305 A.2d 668, 671 (1973), he may not be discharged arbitrarily, illegally, or in bad *643faith. *Appeal of Czeslaw Pawlus,*121 N.H. 273, 274, 428 A.2d 487, 488 (1981); *Clark v. Manchester,*113 N.H. at 275, 305 A.2d at 672. The personnel commission misreads *Pawlus*when it argues that *Pawlus*prevents the personnel commission from hearing appeals from probationary employees. Rather, the personnel commission is uniquely suited to hear these claims. *See Appeal of Hildegard Tamm,*122 N.H. 646, 647, 448 A.2d 1373, 1373 (1982).

The personnel commission refused to consider this case because it erroneously believed that it had no jurisdiction. We remand this case for reconsideration. Of course, only if the employee can convince the commission that his termination was “arbitrary, illegal, capricious or made in bad faith” under the *Pawlus*test could he prevail.

*Remanded.*

All concurred.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7732

JOHNNY CROWDER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

EVA SWITZER; EDDIE SMITH; ROBIN WOODARD,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief

District Judge. (CA-96-1018-5-BO)

Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 4, 1998

Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johnny Crowder, Appellant Pro Se. Eileen Coffey Moore, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of

Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Crowder v. Switzer, No. CA-96-1018-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 5,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to 10 U.S.C.  Section  1350 as adopted  pursuant to Section 1350 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  in  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of
Electronic Game Card, Inc. on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending  September 30,
2005, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report") for Electronic Game Card, Inc., (the "Company"),  the undersigned
hereby certifies that:

(1)      to the  best of my  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with  the
         requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

(2)      to the best of my knowledge,  the  information  contained in the Report
         fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and
         result of operations of the Company.

May 5, 2006


/S/ LEE COLE
-------------------------------
    LEE COLE
    ACTING PRESIDENT AND ACTING
    CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
§ 54.1306 Updating Information Submitted to the National Exchange Carrier Association. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 25163 , Apr. 10, 2024.
( a ) Any incumbent local exchange carrier subject to § 54.1301(a) may update the information submitted to the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) on July 31st pursuant to § 54.1305 one or more times annually on a rolling year basis according to the schedule. ( 1 ) Submit data covering the last nine months of the previous calendar year and the first three months of the existing calendar year no later than September 30th of the existing year;
( 2 ) Submit data covering the last six months of the previous calendar year and the first six months of the existing calendar year no later than December 30th of the existing year;
( 3 ) Submit data covering the last three months of the second previous calendar year and the first nine months of the previous calendar year no later than March 30th of the existing year.
( b ) [Reserved]
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Depomed, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tammy L. Cameron, Interim Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 6, 2009/s/ TAMMY L. CAMERON Tammy L. Cameron Vice President, Finance and
Interim Principal Accounting Officer


---
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 165 (Friday, August 25, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 50391]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7144]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[No. DOD-2006-OS-0081]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by 
September 25, 2006.
    Title and OMB Number: Interactive Customer Evaluation (ICE) System; 
OMB Control Number 0704-0420.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 3,800.
    Responses Per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 3,800.
    Average Burden Per Response: 3 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 190.
    Needs and Uses: The Interactive Customer Evaluation System 
automates and minimizes the use of the current manual paper comment 
cards and other customer satisfaction collection medium, which exist at 
various customer service locations throughout the Department of 
Defense. Members of the public have the opportunity to give automated 
feedback to the service provider on the quality of their experience and 
their satisfaction level. This is a management tool for improving 
customer services.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households; business or other for-
profit.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms: Hillary Jaffe.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Ms. Jaffe at the Office of Management and 
Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503. You may also submit comments, 
identified by docket number and title, by the following method:
    <bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    Instruction: All submissions received must include the agency name, 
docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The general 
policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is 
to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet 
at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, 
including any personal identifiers or contact information.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD/Information Management 
Division, 1777 North Kent Street, RPN, Suite 11000, Arlington, VA 
22209-2133.

    Dated: August 18, 2006.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register, Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 06-7144 Filed 8-24-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
§ 69.108 Transport rate benchmark. ( a ) For transport charges computed in accordance with this subpart, the DS3-to-DS1 benchmark ratio shall be calculated as follows: the telephone company shall calculate the ratio of: ( 1 ) The total charge for a 1.609 km (1 mi) channel termination, 16.09 km (10 mi) of interoffice transmission, and one DS3 multiplexer using the telephone company's DS3 special access rates to;
( 2 ) The total charge for a 1.609 km (1 mi) channel termination plus 16.09 km (10 mi) of interoffice transmission using the telephone company's DS1 special access rates.
( b ) Initial transport rates will generally be presumed reasonable if they are based on special access rates with a DS3-to-DS1 benchmark ratio of 9.6 to 1 or higher.
( c ) If a telephone company's initial transport rates are based on special access rates with a DS3-to-DS1 benchmark ratio of less than 9.6 to 1, those initial transport rates will generally be suspended and investigated absent a substantial cause showing by the telephone company. Alternatively, the telephone company may adjust its initial transport rates so that the DS3-to-DS1 ratio calculated as described in paragraph (a) of this section of those rates is 9.6 or higher. In that case, initial transport rates that depart from existing special access rates effective on September 1, 1992 so as to be consistent with the benchmark will be presumed reasonable only so long as the ratio of revenue recovered through the interconnection charge to the revenue recovered through facilities-based charges is the same as it would be if the telephone company's existing special access rates effective on September 1, 1992 were used.
[58 FR 41189, Aug. 3, 1993, as amended at 58 FR 44952, Aug. 25, 1993; 58 FR 45267, Aug. 27, 1993]
United Security Bancshares Summary of Board Fees



 EXHIBIT 10.24 
 United Security Bancshares, Inc. 
 Summary of Board Fees as of May 18, 2006 

The United Security Bancshares, Inc. Board of Directors approved the following board fees, effective May 18, 2006: 
 United Security Bancshares, Inc. 
  

			
	Retainers:	  	
		
	 Chairperson
	  	 $1,350/month

		
	 Secretary
	  	 $450/month

		
	 Assistant Secretary, Assistant Treasurer and Investment Officer
	  	 $300/month

		
	 Board Members
	  	 $600/month

		
	Board Meeting Fees:	  	
		
	 Board Members
	  	 $500/meeting attended

		
	Committee Meeting Fees:	  	
		
	 Non-Employee Committee Members
	  	 $250/meeting attended

		
	 Chairpersons of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Nominating, Executive and Corporate Governance Committee
	  	 $400/meeting attended

	
	First United Security Bank
		
	Retainers:	  	
		
	 Directors
	  	 $400/month


  
 Additionally, directors who
must travel outside their county of residence to attend a meeting are reimbursed for mileage. 
 Non-employee directors may elect to defer
payment of all or any portion of their fees under the United Security Bancshares, Inc. Non-Employee Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”). The Plan, which was ratified by shareholders at the annual meeting held on
May 11, 2004, permits non-employee directors to invest their directors’ fees and to receive the adjusted value of the deferred amounts in cash and/or shares of Bancshares’ common stock.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual
Report of Electronics For Imaging, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report), I, Guy Gecht, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |                                   
|------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------
|                    |  |  |  | /S/    GUY
GECHT                  
|Date: March 2, 2010 |  |  |  | Guy Gecht, Chief Executive Officer

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Electronics For Imaging, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report), I, John Ritchie, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                                      
|------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | /S/    JOHN
RITCHIE                  
|Date: March 2, 2010 |  |  |  |  |  | John Ritchie, Chief Financial Officer
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            College of Information and Cyberspace
                    National Defense University
                CIC
        Search
                    Search CIC:
                        Search
                Search CIC:
                    Search
    Home

    About 
        Mission & Vision

    Faculty & Staff

    Fact Sheet

    Alumni

    Internships

    FAQ

    Admissions 
        Eligibility Requirements

    Admissions Calendar

    Application Instructions

    Apply Online

    International Students

    Academics 
        Graduate Catalog

    M.S. in Strategic Information and Cyberspace Studies
        
        JPME Master's Degree

    Cyber Workforce Master's Degree (Part Time)

    Leadership Development Programs

    Graduate Certificates

    Academic Partners

    Current Students 
        JPME II  Incoming Students

    LDP Incoming Students

    Student Registration

    Bring Your Own Device

    IA Compliance

    Completion Procedures / Order Transcripts

    Student Services and Resources

    Events
    
        Cyber Beacon

    Cyber PME Colloquium

    Hopper Award

    Lecture Series

    CYBERCOM Symposium

    NEWS

    UC2
    
        About

    Events

    Work With Us

    Center for Cybersecurity
    
        About

    Cybersecurity Center POC

    Cybersecurity Supporting Faculty

    CAE-CDE CISO Certificate Program

    Cybersecurity Trending News

    Cyber Labs
        
        Ethical Hacking

    Critical Infrastructure - SCADA

    Cyber Exercises
        
        Tabletop Exercise

    Cyber Competitions

    Cyber Resources and Awareness

    Stakeholder / Industry Advisory Council

    Contact 
        Contact Us

    Directions

    Access to Ft. McNair

    Map of Ft. McNair  Download
 Vacant Director of Strategic Engagement
 
 
 SHARE
 PRINT
 National Defense University


College of Information and Cyberspace

300 Fifth Ave., Bldg. 62
Fort Lesley J. McNair
Washington, DC 20319-5066

202-685-6300
                    Stay Connected
                About DoD
    News
    Photos & Videos
    Military/DoD WebsitesDoD Inspector General
    Link Disclaimer
    Recovery Act
    FOIA
    USA.gov
    No FEAR ActJoin the Military
    DoD Careers
    Privacy & Security
    Web Policy
    Site Map
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
No. 11-9817.

#### Williams *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.