alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

| 1) | to                the best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements                of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2) | to                the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report                fairly                presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result                of                operations of the Company. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                          |                                                                              |                                   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
| Date                : August 7,                2008        | By:                                                                     | /s/              Lee              Cole |
|                                                                                          | Lee                Cole                                                           |
|                                                                                          | Acting                President and Acting Chief Executive                Officer |

----
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 158 (Wednesday, August 16, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 47091-47092]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6935]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

32 CFR Part 199


Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Services 
(CHAMPUS)

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule is published to correct a previously published 
definition of ``Homebound'' by restoring language that had been 
inadvertently deleted in the Final Rule published at 70 FR 61368 and to 
revise certain references published at 69 FR 51559.

DATES: This rule is effective August 16, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Kottyan, 303-676-3520.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On Friday, August 20, 2004, the Department 
revised the definition of ``Homebound'' by adding a sentence at the 
end. See 69 FR 51559. On Monday, October 24, 2005, the Department again 
revised the

[[Page 47092]]

definition of ``Homebound'' by deleting the above revision and adding 
two sentences at the end. See 70 FR 61368. This rule is published to 
revise the definition of ``Homebound'' by restoring the deleted 
sentence and to correct references in 32 CFR 199.5.

List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 199

    Claims, Dental health, Health care, Health insurance, Individuals 
with disabilities, Military personnel.

    Accordingly, 32 CFR part 199 is amended as follows:

PART 199--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 199 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 10 U.S.C. chapter 55.


0
2. Section 199.2(b) is corrected by adding a sentence at the end of the 
definition for Homebound to read as follows:


Sec. 199.2  Definitions.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    Homebound. * * * In addition to the above, absences, whether 
regular or infrequent, from the beneficiary's primary residence for the 
purpose of attending an educational program in a public or private 
school that is licensed and/or certified by a state, shall not negate 
the beneficiary's homebound status.
* * * * *


Sec. 199.5  [Corrected]

0
3. Section 199.5(h)(5) is corrected by revising ``(i)(4)(v)'' to read 
``(h)(3)(v)(A)'' and by revising ``Individual'' to read 
``Individualized.''

    Dated: August 9, 2006.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 06-6935 Filed 8-15-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4870 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4870

  To amend the San Carlos Apache Tribe Water Rights Settlement Act of 
 1992 to extend the deadline for completing certain actions described 
                                therein.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 1, 1994

    Ms. English of Arizona introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the San Carlos Apache Tribe Water Rights Settlement Act of 
 1992 to extend the deadline for completing certain actions described 
                                therein.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 3711(b)(1) 
of title XXXVII of the San Carlos Apache Tribe Water Rights Settlement 
Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4752) is amended by striking out ``December 31, 
1994'' and inserting in lieu thereof ``December 31, 1995''.
                                 <all>
```
307P15

#### The Kimberley Rice Kaestner 1992 Family Trust v. North Carolina Department of Revenue

Pit's PDR Prior to a Decision of the COA (COA15-896)

Denied
222A14

#### State v. Bernard George Lamp, Jr. (DEATH)

1. Def’s Motion to File Juror Questionnaires Under Seal

1. Dismissed as moot

2. Def’s Motion to Supplement Record on Appeal

2. Dismissed as moot

3. Def’s Motion to Withdraw Appeal

3. Allowed
§ 87.89 Minimum operator requirements. ( a ) A station operator must hold a commercial radio operator license or permit, except as listed in paragraph (d).
( b ) The minimum operator license or permit required for operation of each specific classification is: Minimum Operator License or Permit Land stations, all classes —All frequencies except VHF telephony transmitters providing domestic serviceRP Aircraft stations, all classes —Frequencies below 30 MHz allocated exclusively to aeronautical mobile servicesRP —Frequencies below 30 MHz not allocated exclusively to aeronautical mobile servicesMP or higher —Frequencies above 30 MHz not allocated exclusively to aeronautical mobile services and assigned for international useMP or higher —Frequencies above 30 MHz not assigned for international usenone —Frequencies not used solely for telephone or exceeding 250 watts carrier power or 1000 watts peak envelope powerG or higher
( c ) The operator of a telephony station must directly supervise and be responsible for any other person who transmits from the station, and must ensure that such communications are in accordance with the station license.
( d ) No operator license is required to: ( 1 ) Operate an aircraft radar set, radio altimeter, transponder or other aircraft automatic radionavigation transmitter by flight personnel;
( 2 ) Test an emergency locator transmitter or a survival craft station used solely for survival purposes;
( 3 ) Operate an aeronautical enroute station which automatically transmits digital communications to aircraft stations;
( 4 ) Operate a VHF telephony transmitter providing domestic service or used on domestic flights.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000866722
<NAME> GRANT GEOPHYSICAL INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           7,414
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,140
<ALLOWANCES>                                       158
<INVENTORY>                                        530
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,895
<PP&E>                                          73,002
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,498
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 155,704
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,705
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     10,000
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,978
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   155,704
<SALES>                                         37,868
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,868
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   42,901
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,193
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,431
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,657)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       856
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,666)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,143)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.28)


</TABLE>
§ 54.1714 Audits, inspections, and investigations. ( a ) *Audits.* Schools, libraries, consortia, and service providers shall be subject to audits and other investigations to evaluate their compliance with the statutory and regulatory requirements in this subpart for the Emergency Connectivity Fund, including those requirements pertaining to what equipment and services are purchased, what equipment and services are delivered, and how equipment and services are being used.
( b ) *Inspections and investigations.* Schools, libraries, consortia, and service providers shall permit any representative (including any auditor) appointed by a state education department, the Administrator, the Commission and its Office of Inspector General, or any local, state, or Federal agency with jurisdiction over the entity to enter their premises to conduct inspections for compliance with the statutory and regulatory requirements in this subpart of the Emergency Connectivity Fund.
( c ) *Production of records for audits, inspections, and investigations.* Where necessary for compliance with Federal or state privacy laws, Emergency Connectivity Fund participants may produce records regarding students, school staff, and library patrons in an anonymized or deidentified format. When requested by the Administrator or the Commission, as part of an audit or investigation, schools, libraries, and consortia must seek consent to provide personally identification information from a student who has reached the age of majority, the relevant parent/guardian of a minor student, or the school staff member or library patron prior to disclosure.
§ 8.215 Retention of records. ( a ) For complying consumer IoT products granted authorization to use the FCC IoT Label, the grantee shall maintain the records listed as follows: ( 1 ) A record of the original design and specifications and all changes that have been made to the complying consumer IoT product that may affect compliance with the standards and testing procedures of this subpart.
( 2 ) A record of the procedures used for production inspection and testing to ensure conformance with the standards and testing procedures of this subpart.
( 3 ) A record of the test results that demonstrate compliance with the appropriate regulations in this chapter.
( b ) Records shall be retained for a two-year period after the marketing of the associated product has been permanently discontinued, or until the conclusion of an investigation or a proceeding if the grantee is officially notified that an investigation or any other administrative proceeding involving its product has been instituted.
Exhibit 10.9


    Exhibit
      10.9

     

     

    Marketing Services
      Agreement

    


    Party
      A:
      Shan Xi Kai Da Lv You Gu Wen You Xian Gong Si

    Party
      B:
      Yachao Tuo (ID No.)

    


    
      	
              1.  

            	
              In
                compliance with the Law of People’s Republic of China and relevant
                Regulation and Ordinance, both parties come to an agreement that
                Party B
                responsible for the company promotion of Party
                A.

            


    

    


    
      	
              2.  

            	
              Scope
                of Service

            


    

    Party
      B
      shall provide the promotion plan to Party A and perform the
      promotion.

    


    
      	
              3.  

            	
              Term,
                Location and Execution

            


    

    The
      term
      of this agreement is from September 1 st 2005
      to
      June 15 th 2006.
      The
      promotion shall be executed in Xi An, Shan Xi, China. There will be 10 working
      days for Party A to review the plan provided by Party B. Then, Party A shall
      pay
      Parity B once it accepts the plan.

    


    
      	
              4.  

            	
              Service
                Fee

            


    

    4-1
      The
      total amount is US$12,500.

    4-2
      Party
      A may pay according to the first way of the following two ways , so long as
      final payment is made within 10 working days after the plan is
      accepted.

    
      	
              1)  

            	
              50,000
                freely tradable common shares of DKDY; or

            
	
              2)  

            	
              US$12,500.

            


    

    


    
      	
              5.  

            	
              Breach

            


    

    Any
      party
      fails to execute this agreement shall take the liability according to the Law
      of
      People’s Republic of China and relevant Regulation and Ordinance.

    


    
      	
              6.  

            	
              Dispute

            


    

    Any
      dispute arising from performing this agreement shall be handled under the
      principle of negotiation and compromise. Otherwise, shall be submitted to either
      of the following two ways:

    6-1
      Arbitration Commission

    6-2
      Peole’s Court

    


    
      	
              7.  

            	
              Term

            


    

    This
      agreement is commence on September 1 st 2005,
      and
      terminate on September 1 st 2006.

    


    Party
      A:
      Shan Xi Kai Da Lv You Gu Wen You Xian Gong Si

    


    /s/
      Ming Lei

    Ming
      Lei

    


    AGREED
      TO
      AND ACCEPTED AS OF August 26, 2005:

    


    Party
      B:
      Yachao Tuo (ID No.)

    


    /s/
      Yachao Tuo

    Yachao
      Tuo
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4780

To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to make section 313 (relating to extraneous matter in reconciliation legislation and popularly known

as the Byrd rule) applicable to the Senate only.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 19, 1994

Mr. SABO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Rules

A BILL

To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to make

section 313 (relating to extraneous matter in reconciliation legislation and popularly known as the Byrd rule)

applicable to the Senate only.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That (a) section 313 of the Congressional Budget Act of

4 1974 is amended—

5 (1) in the first subsection (c), by striking ‘‘and

6 again upon the submission of a conference report on

7 such a reconciliation bill or resolution,’’;
2

•HR 4780 IH

1 (2) by striking the second subsection (c) (relat2 ing to conference reports); and

3 (3) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘, motion, or

4 conference report’’ each place it appears and insert5 ing ‘‘or motion’’.

6 (b) The first sentence of section 312 of the Congres7 sional Budget Act of 1974 is amended by inserting ‘‘, ex8 cept for section 313,’’ after ‘‘Act’’.

Æ
No. 11-5880.

#### Washington *v.*Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            College of Information and Cyberspace
                    National Defense University
                CIC
        Search
                    Search CIC:
                        Search
                Search CIC:
                    Search
    Home

    About 
        Mission & Vision

    Faculty & Staff

    Fact Sheet

    Alumni

    Internships

    FAQ

    Admissions 
        Eligibility Requirements

    Admissions Calendar

    Application Instructions

    Apply Online

    International Students

    Academics 
        Graduate Catalog

    M.S. in Strategic Information and Cyberspace Studies
        
        JPME Master's Degree

    Cyber Workforce Master's Degree (Part Time)

    Leadership Development Programs

    Graduate Certificates

    Academic Partners

    Current Students 
        JPME II  Incoming Students

    LDP Incoming Students

    Student Registration

    Bring Your Own Device

    IA Compliance

    Completion Procedures / Order Transcripts

    Student Services and Resources

    Events
    
        Cyber Beacon

    Cyber PME Colloquium

    Hopper Award

    Lecture Series

    CYBERCOM Symposium

    NEWS

    UC2
    
        About

    Events

    Work With Us

    Center for Cybersecurity
    
        About

    Cybersecurity Center POC

    Cybersecurity Supporting Faculty

    CAE-CDE CISO Certificate Program

    Cybersecurity Trending News

    Cyber Labs
        
        Ethical Hacking

    Critical Infrastructure - SCADA

    Cyber Exercises
        
        Tabletop Exercise

    Cyber Competitions

    Cyber Resources and Awareness

    Stakeholder / Industry Advisory Council

    Contact 
        Contact Us

    Directions

    Access to Ft. McNair

    Map of Ft. McNair  Home
  NEWS
  News & Announcements
 News & Announcements News
 Professor Stan Boddie Publishes in Health & Technology Journal By Patricia Coopersmith
                iCollege
 Proposed HERE
 SHARE
 PRINT
 National Defense University


College of Information and Cyberspace

300 Fifth Ave., Bldg. 62
Fort Lesley J. McNair
Washington, DC 20319-5066

202-685-6300
                    Stay Connected
                
                
                DOD Privacy & Security
 DOD Links Disclaimer
 DOD Social Media Policy
 DOD Web Policy
 FOIA
 NDU System of Records Notice
 NDU Privacy & Security Notice
 No FEAR Act
 Open GOV
 Plain Writing Act
 Section 508
 Small Business Act
 USA.gov
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 19

- 00129

- CV

I N THE I NTEREST OF C.M. AND A.M.,

C HILDREN §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 324th District Court

of Tarrant County (324

- 352851

- 03)

May 16, 2019

Opinion by Justice Womack

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dana Womack

Justice Dana Womack
No. 11-5576.

#### Tricome *v.*McLaughlin et al.

Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 46

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit contributions by multicandidate political committees and to limit contributions

in House of Representatives elections from persons other than individual

in-State residents.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. ARCHER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on House Administration

A BILL

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to

prohibit contributions by multicandidate political committees and to limit contributions in House of Representatives elections from persons other than individual inState residents.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF CONTRIBUTIONS BY

4 MULTICANDIDATE POLITICAL COMMITTEES.

5 Section 315(a)(2) of the Federal Election Campaign

6 Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441a(a)(2)) is amended to read

7 as follows:
2

HR 46 IH

1 ‘‘(2) No multicandidate political committee may make

2 contributions with respect to any election for Federal

3 office.’’.

4 SEC. 2. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ELECTION LIMITA5 TION ON CONTRIBUTIONS FROM PERSONS

6 OTHER THAN INDIVIDUAL IN-STATE RESI7 DENTS.

8 Section 315(a) of the Federal Election Campaign Act

9 of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441a) is amended by adding at the end

10 the following new subsection:

11 ‘‘HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ELECTION LIMITATION

12 ON CONTRIBUTIONS FROM PERSONS OTHER THAN

13 INDIVIDUAL IN-STATE RESIDENTS

14 ‘‘(i)(1) A candidate for the office of Representative

15 in, or Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, the Congress

16 may not, with respect to an election for Federal office,

17 accept contributions from persons other than individual

18 in-State residents totaling more than 20 percent of the

19 total of contributions accepted from all sources.

20 ‘‘(2) As used in this subsection, the term ‘individual

21 in-State resident’ means an individual who resides in the

22 State in which the congressional district involved is

23 located.’’.

Æ