alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H

H

H

H

H H

H

H

H

H

î

î

î

î

î î

î

î

î

î

" "

"

"

"

"

"

" " "

1300

1000

1100

1100

1100

1200

1000

1300

1000

1200

1600

1100

1300

1400

1300

1200

1200

1200

1500

1200

1100

1100

1100

1100

1100

1100

1300

ARIZONA

ARIZONA

ESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

ESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS

ESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

YUMA CO

YUMA CO

Sierra de la Lechuguilla

Tinajas

Altas

OE S

Coyote

Water

Tinajas

Altas

Tule

Mountains

Cabeza

Prieta

Peak

Sierra de la

Lechuguilla

3560

35

3563

62

65

35

35

64

61

66

35

35

35

67

35

68

69

N

71

35

35

70

72000m

35

35

59

35

59

3562

35

63

35

35

35

61

35

60

66

68

35

64

67

35

35

35

65

35

000m

3570

3558

69

N

218 219 2

3571

20 222 223 224 225 226 227 28 2 000m

2 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228

000 FEET

000m 18

630

450000

660

FEET

000 FEET

30"

57'

30"

30"

10'

FEET

114°

10'

12' 12'

114°00'

00'

32°15 32°15' '

113°52'30"

32°07'30" 32°07'30"

410000

57'30" 55'

113°52'30" 55'

E

E

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

ARIZONA

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

SIERRA DE LA LECHUGUILLA, AZ-SON

2011

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

WX Interstate Route /. US Route H State Route

SIERRA DE LA LECHUGUILLA QUADRANGLE

ARIZONA-SONORA

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Imagery......................................................NAIP, July 2010

Roads................................................©2006-2011 TomTom

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2011

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2010

Contours.............................National Elevation Dataset, 2003

Boundaries..............Census, IBWC, IBC, USGS, 1972 - 2010

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 12S

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Arizona Coordinate System of 1983 (west

zone)

This map was produced to conform with the

National Geospatial Program US Topo Product Standard, 2011.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.6.1

CONTOUR INTERVAL 20 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0

MILES

1

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

TA

12S

×

Ù

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2011 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

1° 34 ́

28 MILS

11° 19 ́

201 MILS
No. 11-5856.

#### Holmes *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed February 16, 2022

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21

- 1350 Lower Tribunal No. 19

- 24318 CC

________________ 

### Kyle Melkonian , Appellant,

vs. 

### The Office of Code Enforcement, etc. , Appellee.

An Appeal from the County Court for Miami

- Dade County, Luis Perez

- Medina , Judge. Kyle Melkonian , in proper person

. Geraldine Bonzon Keenan, Miami

- Dade County Attorney , and Zach Voss e ler, Assistant County Attorney , for appellee.

Before EMAS, GORDO and BOKOR , JJ. BOKOR, J

.2 Based on Miami

- Dade County’s partial conf ession of error, we vacate the dismissal for lack of prosecution. The County argues that dismissal is nonetheless appropriate due to a failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Miami

- Dade County includes in its appendix a circuit court appellate division opinion

. See Melkonian v. Miami

- Dade C nty. Code Enf ’ t , No. 2019

- 271 AP 01 (Fla. 11th Cir. Ct. Apr. 28, 2020 ). T hat opinion concludes by remanding the matter to the county court for proceedings consistent with that opinion. As the county court dismissed the matter for lack of prosecution and did not have the opportunity to comply with the mandate of the circuit court appellate division, we conclude that t he more prudent course here would be to v acate the dismissal for lack of prosecution, and permit the county court to proceed as appropriate. Reversed and remanded

.
Tips for Travelers to Central and South America

**FOREWORD**
Travelers to Central and South America are usually welcomed with courtesy and warmth. There is great diversity in the region. You can visit major cosmopolitan cities, ruins of great ancient civilizations, primeval tropical rainforests and breathtaking locales. However, there are important things that you should know before you travel. That is why we have prepared this publication. We wish you an enjoyable and memorable journey.

*Please note that travel to Mexico and the Caribbean are covered in their own publications. Please refer to the last page of this pamphlet for further details.*

*DEPARTMENT OF STATE PUBLICATION 10407*
§ 80.15 Eligibility for station license. ( a ) *General.* A station license cannot be granted to or held by a foreign government or its representative.
( b ) *Public coast stations and Alaska-public fixed stations.* A station license for a public coast station or an Alaska-public fixed station cannot be granted to or held by: ( 1 ) Any alien or the representative of any alien;
( 2 ) Any foreign government or its representative;
( 3 ) Any corporation organized under the laws of any foreign government;
( 4 ) Any corporation of which more than one-fifth of the capital stock is owned of record or voted by aliens or their representatives or by a foreign government or its representative, or by a corporation organized under the laws of a foreign country; or
( 5 ) Any corporation directly or indirectly controlled by any other corporation of which more than one-fourth of the capital stock is owned of record or voted by aliens, their representatives, or by a foreign government or its representatives, or by any corporation organized under the laws of a foreign country, if the Commission finds that the public interest will be served by the refusal or revocation of such license.
( c ) *Private coast and marine utility stations.* The supplemental eligibility requirements for private coast and marine utility stations are contained in § 80.501(a).
( d ) *Ship stations.* A ship station license may only be granted to: ( 1 ) The owner or operator of the vessel;
( 2 ) A subsidiary communications corporation of the owner or operator of the vessel;
( 3 ) A State or local government subdivision; or
( e ) A 406.0-406.1 MHz EPIRB may be used by any ship required by U.S. Coast Guard regulations to carry an EPIRB or by any ship that is equipped with a VHF ship radio station.
[51 FR 31213, Sept. 2, 1986, as amended at 53 FR 37308, Sept. 26, 1988; 58 FR 33344, June 17, 1993; 61 FR 55581, Oct. 28, 1996; 68 FR 46960, Aug. 7, 2003; 69 FR 64671, Nov. 8, 2004; 73 FR 4480, Jan. 25, 2008; 76 FR 67610, Nov. 2, 2011]
Argued and submitted March 31,

reversed and remanded April 20,

petition for review allowed June 21, 1994 (319 Or 273)

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Appellant, v.*JERRY LEE FLEETWOOD, *Respondent.*

(CR92167; CA A77709)

872 P2d 998

Janie M. Burcart, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Louis R. Miles, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Haselton, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded. *State v. Bass,*126 Or App 303, 868 P2d 761 (1994).
<PAGE>

Exhibit 10.18


                      [Union Bank of California letterhead]


                                 April 24, 2001


VIA FACSIMILE AND FIRST-CLASS U.S. MAIL
---------------------------------------

SVI Solutions, Inc.
12707 High Bluff Drive
Suite 335
San Diego, California 92130
Attention:    Mr. Kevin O'Neill
              Chief Financial Officer

Dear Kevin:

         Reference is made to the Term Loan Agreement, dated as of June 3, 1999,
by and between SVI Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (successor-by-merger
to SVI Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation) ("Borrower"), and Union Bank of
California, N.A. (the "Bank"), as amended (collectively, the "Loan Agreement").
All capitalized terms used in this letter without definition shall have the
respective meanings specified in the Loan Agreement.

         This letter shall confirm that Bank has agreed to extend the term of
the Loan Agreement for thirty days, through April 30, 2001. All other terms of
the Loan Agreement and the other Loan Documents are unchanged.

         Please indicate your agreement to the terms of this letter by signing
in the space provided below. Of course, if you have any questions, please give
me a call.

                                           Very truly yours,

                                           UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA, N.A.


                                           By: /s/ Joel Steiner
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Joel Steiner
                                              Vice President


ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:

SVI SOLUTIONS, INC.,
a Delaware corporation

By: /s/ Kevin O'Neill
    -----------------------------------------
    Kevin O'Neill
    Chief Financial Officer
No. 11-251.

#### Wallace *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Union Calendar No. 346

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4812

[Report No. 103–634]

A BILL

To direct the Administrator of General Services to

Francisco, California, and for other purposes.acquire by transfer the Old U.S. Mint in San

AUGUST 1, 1994

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
IB

Union Calendar No. 346

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4812

[Report No. 103–634]

To direct the Administrator of General Services to acquire by transfer the

Old U.S. Mint in San Francisco, California, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 21, 1994

Mr. MINETA (for himself and Ms. PELOSI) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Public Works and Transportation

AUGUST 1, 1994

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union

and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To direct the Administrator of General Services to acquire

by transfer the Old U.S. Mint in San Francisco, California, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. OLD U.S. MINT, SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA.

4 Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment

5 of this Act, the Administrator of General Services shall
2

•HR 4812 RH

1 take such actions as may be necessary to acquire by trans2 fer, without consideration, the property referred to as the

3 ‘‘Old U.S. Mint’’, located at Fifth and Mission Streets in

4 San Francisco, California, together with any improve5 ments, structures, and fixtures located on the property.
- IL 1972
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-10341

IN RE: JOEL LENAMON, DEBTOR 

JOEL LENAMON, 

Appellant 

v. 

MORRIS FAMILY TRUST PARTNERSHIP, 

Appellee 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas 

USDC No. 4:15-CV-570-Y 

Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

This appeal has been considered in the light of the briefs and pertinent 

parts of the record. Based upon that review, the district court’s order

remanding this matter to the bankruptcy court for further proceedings, 

Lenamon v. Morris Family P’ship, Civ. Action No. 4:15-CV-570-Y, Doc. 13 (N. 

 

* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. 

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 12, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-10341 Document: 00513792793 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/12/2016
16-10341

2 

D. Tex. 1 March 2016), does not meet the criteria for “final judgments, orders, 

or decrees”, 28 U.S.C. § 158(d), as required for an appeal to this court. E.g., In 

re Yazoo Pipeline Co., L.P., 746 F.3d 211, 214-15 (5th Cir. 2014).

Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

 Case: 16-10341 Document: 00513792793 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/12/2016
§ 80.1093 Ship radio equipment—Sea areas A1, A2, A3, and A4. This section contains the additional equipment requirements for ships that sail in all sea areas, *i.e.,* sea areas A1, A2, A3, and A4. Ships fitting in accordance with this section satisfy the requirements denoted in §§ 80.1087, 80.1089, and 80.1091 for sea areas A1, A2, and A3. ( a ) In addition to meeting the requirements of § 80.1085 of this part, ships engaged on voyages in all sea areas must be provided with the radio installations and equipment required by § 80.1091(b), except that the equipment required by § 80.1091(b)(3)(ii) and § 80.1091(b)(3)(iii) cannot be accepted as an alternative to that required by § 80.1091(b)(3)(i), which must always be provided.
( b ) Ships engaged on voyages in all sea areas also must comply with the requirements of § 80.1091(c).
[57 FR 9065, Mar. 16, 1992, as amended at 69 FR 64680, Nov. 8, 2004]
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                 CONSENT OF GRANT THORNTON, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We have issued our report dated December 5, 2003 (except for note 2, as to which
the date is December 23, 2003), accompanying the consolidated financial
statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of International
DisplayWorks, Inc. (formally Granite Bay Technologies, Inc. and earlier Morrow
Snowboards, Inc.) on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2003. We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration
Statement of International DisplayWorks, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-108907,
effective September 18, 2003) pertaining to the Amended 2000 Employee Equity
Incentive Plan, Form S-8 (File No. 333-87296, effective May 1, 2002) pertaining
to the 2000 Employee Equity Incentive Plan and Stock Option Agreements, Form S-8
(File No. 333-87298, effective May 1, 2002) pertaining to the 1999 Stock Option
Plan for Non-Employee Directors and the Morrow Snowboards, Inc. 1990 Equity
Incentive Plan and Form S-8 (File No. 333-04761, effective May 30, 1996)
pertaining to the Morrow Snowboards, Inc. Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee
Directors and related Prospectuses.

/S/ GRANT THORNTON

Hong Kong
February 5, 2004
§ 73.7001 Services subject to evaluation by point system. ( a ) A point system will be used to evaluate mutually exclusive applications for new radio, television, and FM translator facilities, and for major changes to existing facilities, on reserved channels.
( b ) A point system will be used to evaluate mutually exclusive applications for new radio, television, and FM translator facilities, and for major changes to existing facilities, on non-reserved channels, only when all of the mutually exclusive applications are for noncommercial educational broadcast stations, as described in 47 U.S.C. 397(6)(A) or 47 U.S.C. 397(6)(B).
( c ) A point system will be used to evaluate mutually exclusive applications for new television translator and low power television facilities, and for major changes to existing facilities, only when all of the mutually exclusive applications are for noncommercial educational broadcast stations, as described in 47 U.S.C. 397(6)(B).
[65 FR 36380, June 8, 2000, as amended at 68 FR 26229, May 15, 2003]
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Interactive Intelligence, Inc. (the
“Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I,  Donald E. Brown, M.D., Chairman of the Board, President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1,
      fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and





(2)
            The information contained in
      the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.





/s/
Donald E. Brown, M.D.
 Donald E.
Brown, M.D.


President
and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
Executive Officer)


November
6, 2008
§ 73.712 Equipment tests. ( a ) During the process of construction of an international broadcasting station, the permittee, having obtained authorization for frequencies and hours as set forth in the Note to § 73.702(d) may, without further authority of the FCC, conduct equipment tests for the purpose of such adjustments and measurements as may be necessary to assure compliance with the terms of the construction permit, the technical provisions of the application therefor and the rules and regulations. Such tests shall use voice identification and test tones only. No programming shall be conducted during equipment tests.
( b ) The Commission may notify the permittee to conduct no tests or may cancel, suspend, or change the date for the beginning of equipment tests when and if such action may appear to be in the public interest, convenience, and necessity.
( c ) Equipment tests may be continued so long as the construction permit shall remain valid: *Provided, however,* That the procedure set forth in paragraph (a) of this section must be repeated prior to the conducting of such tests in each season after the season in which the testing began.
( d ) The authorization for tests embodied in this section shall not be construed as constituting a license to operate but as a necessary part of construction.
[28 FR 13696, Dec. 14, 1963, as amended at 37 FR 25842, Dec. 5, 1972. Redesignated and amended at 38 FR 18894, July 16, 1973; 47 FR 40174, Sept. 13, 1982]
Exhibit 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and
appoints Gerald L. Storch, F. Clay Creasey, Jr. and David J. Schwartz and each of them, his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and
stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Toys R Us, Inc. for the fiscal year ended February 3, 2007, and any amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents
in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform such and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done, as
fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by
virtue hereof.

This Power of Attorney may be executed in separate counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all such counterparts shall
together constitute one and the same instrument.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has
executed this Power of Attorney as of the 30thday of March, 2007.



|                      |  |  |  |          |  |  |  |                          
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -------- |  |  |  | -------------------------
|Name                  |  |  |  | Title    |  |  |  | Signature                
|                      |  |  |  |         
|Joshua Bekenstein     |  |  |  | Director |  |  |  | /s/ Joshua Bekenstein    
|                      |  |  |  |         
|Michael M. Calbert    |  |  |  | Director |  |  |  | /s/ Michael M. Calbert   
|                      |  |  |  |         
|Michael D. Fascitelli |  |  |  | Director |  |  |  | /s/ Michael D. Fascitelli
|                      |  |  |  |         
|Matthew S. Levin      |  |  |  | Director |  |  |  | /s/ Matthew S. Levin     
|                      |  |  |  |         
|Dean Nelson           |  |  |  | Director |  |  |  | /s/ Dean Nelson          
|                      |  |  |  |         
|John Pfeffer          |  |  |  | Director |  |  |  | /s/ John Pfeffer         
|                      |  |  |  |         
|Dwight Poler          |  |  |  | Director |  |  |  | /s/ Dwight Poler         
|                      |  |  |  |         
|Steven Roth           |  |  |  | Director |  |  |  | /s/ Steven Roth          
|                      |  |  |  |         
|Wendy Silverstein     |  |  |  | Director |  |  |  | /s/ Wendy Silverstein
No. 11-5528.

#### Darvie *v.*Countryman et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 64.6407 Employee training.

A covered provider must train its employees who may interact with survivors regarding a line separation request on how to assist them or on how to direct them to other employees who have received such training.
§ 78.61 Operator requirements. ( a ) Except in cases where a CARS station is operated unattended in accordance with § 78.53 or except as provided in other paragraphs of this section, a person shall be on duty at the place where the transmitting apparatus is located, in plain view and in actual charge of its operation or at a remote control point established pursuant to the provision of § 78.51, at all times when the station is in operation. Control and monitoring equipment at a remote control point shall be readily accessible and clearly visible to the operator at that position.
( b ) Any transmitter tests, adjustments, or repairs during or coincident with the installation, servicing, operation or maintenance of a CARS station which may affect the proper operation of such station shall be made by or under the immediate supervision and responsibility of a person responsible for proper functioning of the station equipment.
( c ) The operator on duty and in charge of a CARS station may, at the discretion of the licensee, be employed for other duties or for the operation of another station or stations in accordance with the rules governing such stations. However, such duties shall in no way impair or impede the required supervision of the CARS station.
( d ) CARS stations operating with nominal transmitter power of 250 milliwatts or less may be operated by any person whom the licensee shall designate. Pursuant to this provision, the designated person shall perform as the licensee's agent and proper operation of the station shall remain the licensee's responsibility.
( e ) Mobile CARS stations operating with nominal transmitter power in excess of 250 milliwatts may be operated by any person whom the licensee shall designate: Provided that a person is on duty at a receiving end of the circuit to supervise operation and to immediately institute measures sufficient to assure prompt correction of any condition of improper operation that may be observed.
(Secs. 1, 2, 301, 307, 48 Stat., as amended, 1064, 1081, 1083; (47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 301, 307))
[43 FR 4617, Feb. 3, 1978, as amended at 49 FR 20671, May 16, 1984; 50 FR 32418, Aug. 12, 1985]