alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Tyvon Gullatt, Appellant

No. 06

- 19

- 00001

- CR v.
The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 102nd District Court of Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 18F

0176

- 102 ). Opinion delivered by J ustice Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court

. We note that the appellant, Tyvon Gullatt, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED OCTOBER 4, 2019 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
No. 10-10844.

#### Gribovszki *v.*Stanford University.

Ct. App. Cal., 6th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
§ 68.420 Review and disposition of informal complaints. ( a ) Where it appears from the defendant's answer, or from other communications with the parties, that an informal complaint has been satisfied, the Commission or the Consumer Information Bureau on delegated authority may, in its discretion, consider the informal complaint closed, without response to the complainant or defendant. In all other cases, the Commission or the Consumer Information Bureau shall inform the parties of its review and disposition of a complaint filed under this subpart. Where practicable, this information (the nature of which is specified in paragraphs (b) through (d) of this section, shall be transmitted to the complainant and defendant in the manner requested by the complainant, (e.g., letter, facsimile transmission, telephone (voice/TRS/TTY), Internet e-mail, ASCII text, audio-cassette recording, or Braille).
( b ) In the event the Commission or the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau determines, based on a review of the information provided in the informal complaint and the defendant's answer thereto, that no further action is required by the Commission or the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau with respect to the allegations contained in the informal complaint, the informal complaint shall be closed and the complainant and defendant shall be duly informed of the reasons therefor. A complainant, unsatisfied with the defendant's response to the informal complaint and the staff decision to terminate action on the informal complaint, may file a complaint with the Commission or the Enforcement Bureau as specified in §§ 68.400 through 68.412.
( c ) In the event the Commission or the Consumer Information Bureau on delegated authority determines, based on a review of the information presented in the informal complaint and the defendant's answer thereto, that a material and substantial question remains as to the defendant's compliance with the requirements of this subpart, the Commission or the Consumer Information Bureau may conduct such further investigation or such further proceedings as may be necessary to determine the defendant's compliance with the requirements of this subpart and to determine what, if any, remedial actions and/or sanctions are warranted.
( d ) In the event that the Commission or the Consumer Information Bureau on delegated authority determines, based on a review of the information presented in the informal complaint and the defendant's answer thereto, that the defendant has failed to comply with or is presently not in compliance with the requirements of this subpart, the Commission or the Consumer Information Bureau on delegated authority may order or prescribe such remedial actions and/or sanctions as are authorized under the Act and the Commission's rules and which are deemed by the Commission or the Consumer Information Bureau on delegated authority to be appropriate under the facts and circumstances of the case.
[66 FR 7588, Jan. 24, 2001, as amended at 67 FR 13229, Mar. 21, 2002]
322P15

#### State v. Raymond Alan Griffin

Petitioner’s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Habeas Corpus*

Denied 09/18/2015
§ 90.307 Protection criteria. The tables and figures listed in § 90.309 shall be used to determine the effective radiated power (ERP) and antenna height of the proposed land mobile base station and the ERP for the associated control station (control station antenna height shall not exceed 31 meters (100 feet) above average terrain (AAT)). ( a ) Base stations operating on the frequencies available for land mobile use in any urbanized area and having an antenna height (AAT) less than 152 meters (500 feet) shall afford protection to co-channel and adjacent channel television stations in accordance with the values set out in tables A and E of § 90.309, except for channel 15 in New York, NY, and Cleveland, OH, and channel 16 in Detroit, MI, where protection will be in accordance with the values set forth in tables B and E in 47 CFR 90.309.
( b ) For base stations having antenna heights between 152 and 914 meters (500-3000 feet) above average terrain, the effective radiated power must be reduced below 1 kilowatt in accordance with the values shown in the power reduction graph in Figure A in § 90.309, except for channel 15 in New York, NY, and Cleveland, OH, and channel 16 in Detroit, MI, where the effective radiated power must be reduced in accordance with Figure B in § 90.309. For heights of more than 152 meters (500 feet) above average terrain, the distance to the radio path horizon will be calculated assuming smooth earth. If the distance so determined equals or exceeds the distance to the Grade B contour of a co-channel TV station (Grade B contour defined in § 73.683(a) of this chapter), an authorization will not be granted unless it can be shown that actual terrain considerations are such as to provide the desired protection at the Grade B contour, or that the effective radiated power will be further reduced so that, assuming free space attenuation, the desired protection at the Grade B contour will be achieved.
( c ) Mobile units and control stations operating on the frequencies available for land mobile use in any given urbanized area shall afford protection to co-channel and adjacent channel television stations in accordance with the values set forth in table C in § 90.309 and paragraph (d) of this section except for channel 15 in New York, NY, and Cleveland, OH, and channel 16 in Detroit, MI, where protection will be in accordance with the values set forth in table D in § 90.309 and paragraph (d) of this section.
( d ) The minimum distance between a land mobile base station which has associated mobile units and a protected adjacent channel television station is 145 km (90 miles).
( e ) The television stations to be protected (co-channel, adjacent channel, IM, and IF) in any given urbanized area, in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs (a), (b), (c), and (d) of this section, are identified in the Commission's publication “TV stations to be considered in the preparation of Applications for Land Mobile Facilities in the Band 470-512 MHz.” The publication is available at the offices of the Federal Communications Commission in Washington, DC or upon the request of interested persons.
[72 FR 35197, June 27, 2007]
§ 76.1610 Change of operational information. The Operator shall inform the Commission on FCC Form 324 whenever there is a change of cable television system operator; change of legal name, change of the operator's mailing address or FCC Registration Number (FRN); or change in the operational status of a cable television system. Notification must be done within 30 days from the date the change occurs and must include the following information, as appropriate: ( a ) The legal name of the operator and whether the operator is an individual, private association, partnership, corporation, or government entity. See § 76.5(cc). If the operator is a partnership, the legal name of the partner responsible for communications with the Commission shall be supplied;
( b ) The assumed name (if any) used for doing business in each community;
( c ) The physical address, including zip code, and e-mail address, if applicable, to which all communications are to be directed;
( d ) The nature of the operational status change (e.g., operation terminated, merged with another system, inactive, deleted, etc.);
( e ) The names and FCC identifiers (e.g., CA 0001) of the system communities affected.
Note 1 to § 76.1610 :
FCC system community identifiers are routinely assigned upon registration. They have been assigned to all reported system communities based on previous Form 325 data. If a system community in operation prior to March 31, 1972, has not previously been assigned a system community identifier, the operator shall provide the following information in lieu of the identifier: Community Name, Community Type (*i.e.*, incorporated town, unincorporated settlement, etc.), County Name, State, Operator Legal Name, Operator Assumed Name for Doing Business in the Community, Operator Mail Address, and Year and Month service was first provided by the physical system.
[65 FR 53617, Sept. 5, 2000, as amended at 66 FR 47897, Sept. 14, 2001; 68 FR 27003, May 19, 2003; 83 FR 7631, Feb. 22, 2018]
```

[112th Congress Public Law 187]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 126 STAT. 1432]]

Public Law 112-187
112th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the United States courthouse located at 709 West 9th Street 
       in Juneau, Alaska, as the ``Robert Boochever United States 
          Courthouse''. <<NOTE: Oct. 5, 2012 -  [H.R. 4347]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 709 West 9th Street in 
Juneau, Alaska, shall be known and designated as the ``Robert Boochever 
United States Courthouse''.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert Boochever 
United States Courthouse''.

    Approved October 5, 2012.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4347:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 112-614 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 158 (2012):
            July 23, considered and passed House.
            Sept. 21, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 11.1

Exhibit 11.1     Statement regarding computation of per share earnings.

Presented below is the reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of
the computations for earnings per common share and earnings per common share -
diluted.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                          1997
                                                        Income           Shares       Per Share
                                                      (Numerator)     (Denominator)     Amount
                                                      -----------     -------------   ---------
<S>                                                    <C>               <C>           <C>
Income available to common stockholder                 $3,917,124        3,323,346
     Less unallocated ESOP shares                              --          139,077
                                                       ----------       ----------
Basic earnings per common share
     Income available to common stockholders            3,917,124        3,184,269     $ 1.23

Effective of dilutive securities - options                     --           56,800
                                                       ----------       ----------
Earnings per common share - assuming dilution
     Income available to common stockholders +
     assumed conversions                               $3,917,124       $3,241,069     $ 1.21

</TABLE>

Basic earnings per common share information for 1996 and 1995 is calculated by
dividing net income by the weighted number of shares outstanding (3,818,273
and 3,919,488, respectively).  Earnings per common share - assuming dilution
for 1996 did not include the effect of options to purchase 237,000 shares of
common stock because the exercise price was greater than the average market
price of the common shares.  Earnings per common share - assuming dilution for
1995 did not differ from basic earnings per common share because there were no
stock options or other common stock equivalents outstanding.

                                     -155-
§ 80.759 Average terrain elevation. ( a ) ( 1 ) Draw radials from the antenna site for each 45 degrees of azimuth starting with true north. Any such radial which extends entirely over land from the antenna site to the point of + 17 dBu field strength need not be drawn.
( 2 ) If the distance from the antenna site to the point of + 17 dBu field strength between any of the 45 degrees radials would be less than the distances calculated along these radials, an additional radial between such adjacent radials must be plotted and calculations made in each case. Each additional radial must be that radial along which it appears by inspection that transmission loss would be greatest.
( b ) Draw a circle of 16 km (10 statute mile) radius using the antenna site as the center. Divide each radial into 320 meter (0.2 statute mile) increments inside the circumference to the 3.2 km (2 statute mile) point.
( c ) Calculate the height above sea level of each 320 meter (0.2 statute mile) division by interpolating the contour intervals of the map, and record the value.
( d ) Average the values by adding them and dividing by the number of readings along each radial.
( e ) Calculate the height above average terrain by averaging the values calculated for each radial.
[51 FR 31213, Sept. 2, 1986, as amended at 58 FR 44953, Aug. 25, 1993]
§ 64.6100 Minimum and maximum Prepaid Calling account balances. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 77366 , Sept. 20, 2024.
( a ) No Provider shall institute a minimum balance requirement for a Consumer to use Debit or Prepaid Calling for interstate or international calls.
( b ) No Provider shall prohibit a consumer from depositing at least $50 per transaction to fund a Debit or Prepaid Calling account that can be used for interstate or international calls.
[85 FR 67462, Oct. 23, 2020]
§ 90.537 Trunking requirement. ( a ) *General use and State License channels.* All fixed transmitter sites using six or more narrowband channels in the 769-775 MHz and 799-805 MHz frequency bands must be trunked, except for those described in paragraph (b) of this section. This paragraph does not apply to Vehicular Repeater Systems (MO3) authorized on the General Use and State License channels listed in § 90.531(b).
( b ) *Interoperability and low power channels.* Trunking is permitted only on Interoperability channels specified in § 90.531(b)(1)(iii). Trunked use must be strictly on a secondary, non-interference basis to conventional operations. The licensee must monitor and immediately release these channels when they are needed for interoperability purposes. All systems using narrowband low power channels listed in § 90.531(b)(3) and (4) are exempt from the trunking requirements described in paragraph (a) of this section.
[79 FR 39340, July 10, 2014, as amended at 83 FR 30367, June 28, 2018]
No. 11-9149.

#### Sturgis *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 929/2005

of 17 June 2005         

fixing the minimum selling price for butter for the 21st individual invitation to tender issued under the standing invitation to tender referred to in Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular Article 10(c) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 21st individual invitation to tender pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999, in respect of which the time limit for the submission of tenders expired on 14 June 2005, the minimum selling price for butter is fixed at 275 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 18 June 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 June 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

(2)OJ L 333, 24.12.1999, p. 11. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2250/2004 (OJ L 381, 28.12.2004, p. 25).

----
SUPREME COURT—APPELLATE DIVISION—SECOND DEPARTMENT.

December I2, I9I9.

#### THE PEOPLE v. MAY PHELPS.

(189 App. Div. 775.)

Vagrancy—Violation of subdivision 4 of section 887 of Code of Criminal Procedure—Evidence sufficient to sustain conviction—Offer to commit prostitution.

In a prosecution for vagrancy in violation of subdivision 4 of section 887 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, evidence *held*sufficient to show defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

*205In such an action proof that the defendant offered to commit prostitution is sufficient to sustain a conviction.

Appeal by the plaintiff, The People of the State of New York, by permission, from an order and judgment of the County Court of Kings county, entered in the office of the clerk of said county on the 25th day of August, 1919, as resettled, reversing a judgment of the Magistrate’s Court of the City of New York, borough of Brooklyn, rendered on the 29th day of May, 1919, convicting the defendant of a violation of subdivision 4 of section 887 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

*Harry G. Anderson, Assistant District Attorney (Harry E. Lewis, District Attorney,*with him on the brief), for the appellant.

*John S. Bennett,*for the respondent.

Rich, J.:

The evidence before the magistrate was sufficient to warrant the conviction of the defendant of the crime charged against her, and a careful reading of the testimony, which it is unnecessary to quote, leads to the conclusion that the learned county judge was in error in finding that the guilt of defendant was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

The reversal is based upon another ground also. The county judge was of the opinion that in order to sustain a conviction under subdivision 4 of section 887 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, it was incumbent upon the people to “ establish that the defendant was a common prostitute or night walker, that she solicited to the annoyance of the inhabitants or passersby, and that she was there in a public place for the purpose of prostitution.” This was a mistaken view of the law. The proof established that the defendant offered to commit prostitution, and this proof was all that was requisite to a conviction. *206The defendant was convicted upon sufficient evidence, and the order of the County Court must he reversed.

The order of the County Court of Kings county is reversed and the judgment of conviction in the Magistrate’s Court affirmed, and defendant remanded to custody.

Jenks, P. J., Putnam, Blackmar and Jaycox, JJ., concurred.

Order of the County Court of Kings county reversed, judgment of conviction in the Magistrate’s Court affirmed, and . defendant remanded to custody.
#### § 80.903 Inspection of radiotelephone installation.

Every vessel subject to Part III of Title III of the Communications Act must have a detailed inspection of the radio installation by an FCC-licensed technician in accordance with § 80.59 once every five years. The FCC-licensed technician must use the latest FCC Information Bulletin, *How to Conduct an Inspection of a Small Passenger Vessel.* If the ship passes the inspection, the technician will issue a Communications Act Safety Radiotelephony Certificate. Communications Act Radiotelephony Certificates may be obtained from the Commission's National Call Center—(888) 225-5322—or from its forms contractor.

[63 FR 29660, June 1, 1998]
/1/WASHINGTON

March 13, 2015

VIA EMAIL

Mr. Robert Finamore

Chief, Foreign Air Carrier Licensing Division

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Polynesian Limited—Request for Thirty-Day Extension of Cabotage Operations, Docket

DOT-OST-2014-0144

Dear Mr. Finamore:

In accordance with the Department of Transportation’s Notice of Action Taken issued

February 26, 2015, in the captioned docket, I am writing on behalf of Polynesian Limited

(“Polynesian”) to request approval of an additional thirty days of cabotage operations between

Pago Pago and the Manu’a Islands, American Samoa. Polynesian requests approval of

cabotage operations through April 30, 2015.

The circumstances described in Polynesian’s application have not changed and

Polynesian’s application continues to meet the requirements of 49 USC 40109(g) for grant of

an emergency cabotage exemption. The Pago Pago-Manu’a Islands route remains without

U.S. carrier service. Polynesian is the only air carrier able to provide much needed

transportation between the two points, thus preventing severe hardship to American Samoa

residents. During the past several months Polynesian has performed medical evacuations

from the Manu’a Islands and also transported hundreds of passengers, government

employees and engineers between Pago Pago and the Manu’a Islands. There is a clear need

for continued service for an additional thirty days.

Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP

2550 M Street, NW

Washington, D.C. 20037

charles.donley@squirepb.com

+1.202.626.6840
Mr. Robert Finamore

March 13, 2015

Page 2

/1/WASHINGTON

Please contact the undersigned with any questions.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Charles F. Donley II

Charles F. Donley II

cc: Office of the Governor

Executive Office Building, Third Floor, Utulei

Pago Pago, American Samoa 96799

Fax: 011 684-633-2269

jhill@cooley.com; perkmann@cooley.com

alex.sene.jr@gmail.com

steve.morrissey@united.com; dan.weiss@united.com

pdoell@naca.cc
#### § 90.283 [Reserved]