alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, David K. Spohr, Senior Vice President and Director of Fund Administration of Preferred Investment
Solutions Corp., the Managing Owner of Futures Strategic Trust (Registrant), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ David K. Spohr                                       
|David K. Spohr                                           
|Senior Vice President and Director of Fund Administration
|(Principal Financial/Accounting Officer)                 
|March 30, 2007
No. 11-9337.

#### Surabian et al. *v.*Residential Funding Co., LLC, fka Residential Funding Corp.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certio-rari denied.
#### § 27.1214 EBS grandfathered leases.

All leases of current EBS spectrum entered into prior to January 10, 2005 and in compliance with leasing rules contained in 47 CFR part 74, revised as of October 1, 2004, may continue in force and effect, notwithstanding any inconsistency between such leases and the rules applicable to spectrum leasing arrangements set forth in this chapter. Such leases entered into pursuant to the rules formerly contained in 47 CFR part 74 may be renewed and assigned in accordance with the terms of such lease. All spectrum leasing arrangements leases entered into after January 10, 2005, under the rules set forth in part 1 of this chapter and this part, must comply with the rules in those parts.

[84 FR 57366, Oct. 25, 2019]
§ 76.10 Review. ( a ) *Interlocutory review.* ( 1 ) Except as provided below, no party may seek review of interlocutory rulings until a decision on the merits has been issued by the staff or administrative law judge.
( 2 ) Rulings listed in this paragraph are reviewable as a matter of right. An application for review of such ruling may not be deferred and raised as an exception to a decision on the merits. ( i ) If the staff's ruling denies or terminates the right of any person to participate as a party to the proceeding, such person, as a matter of right, may file an application for review of that ruling.
( ii ) If the staff's ruling requires production of documents or other written evidence, over objection based on a claim of privilege, the ruling on the claim of privilege is reviewable as a matter of right.
( iii ) If the staff's ruling denies a motion to disqualify a staff person from participating in the proceeding, the ruling is reviewable as a matter of right.
( b ) *Petitions for reconsideration.* Petitions for reconsideration of interlocutory actions by the Commission's staff or by an administrative law judge will not be entertained. Petitions for reconsideration of a decision on the merits made by the Commission's staff should be filed in accordance with §§ 1.104 through 1.106 of this chapter.
( c ) *Application for review.* ( 1 ) Any party to a part 76 proceeding aggrieved by any decision on the merits issued by the staff pursuant to delegated authority may file an application for review by the Commission in accordance with § 1.115 of this chapter.
( 2 ) Any party to a proceeding under this part aggrieved by any decision on the merits by an administrative law judge may file an appeal of the decision directly with the Commission, in accordance with §§ 1.276(a) and 1.277(a) through (c) of this chapter.
[64 FR 6571, Feb. 10, 1999, as amended at 85 FR 81812, Dec. 17, 2020]
#### § 15.607 Equipment authorization of Access BPL equipment.

Access BPL equipment shall be subject to Certification as specified in § 15.101.
### Docket No. FAA**- 2012**  **- 1164** 

. **Contacts.** With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted **Date** Response **National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti**  4/11/12 **Regional Airline Association** 4/11/ 12 **Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman**  4/11/12 **ATA M Lopez**  4/11/12
#### Elias Bayer, Judgment Creditor, Plaintiff, *v.*Pincus Sack et al., Judgment Debtors, Defendants.

(City Court of New York, Special Term,

March, 1910.)

Exemptions — Property exempt — Insurance money.

Where property of a judgment debtor exempt from execution is destroyed by fire, his judgment creditor may not by a third party order in supplementary proceedings compel the moneys payable to the judgment debtor under a policy' of insurance on such property to be paid to such creditor, but the judgment debtor is entitled to receive and use such moneys to replace the articles destroyed.

Pbooeedings supplementary .to execution.

*537Max Silverstein, for judgment creditor.

Harry Steinbock, for judgment debtors.

Finelite, J.

This is a motion why a third party order heretofore issued on the 28th day of February, 1910, out of this court, staying the officers of the Scottish Union and National Insurance Company of Edinburgh' from paying over money in its possession due to Pineus Sack, one of the judgment debtors herein, should not be vacated and set aside. It appears from the moving affidavits that a judgment of $393.68 was obtained in this court against said Pineus Sack on the 21st day of February, 1908; that on the 23d day of February, 1910, a fire occurred in the apartments occupied by said Pincus Sack, and that beds, bedding and clothing belonging to himself and family were destroyed, which property was covered by an insurance policy of said company to the amount of $1,300. The said damage was compromised with said company for the sum of $350, which said Sack agreed to accept for said loss. Before this money could be paid over to said Sack the judgment creditor herein caused a third party order, containing a stay and signed by one of the justices as aforesaid, to be served upon said insurance company, thereby staying it from paying over the said sum of $350 to said Sack. The said judgment debtor claims the property destroyed to be exempt by reason of sections 1390 and 1391, Code of 'Civil Procedure, and also the proceeds therefrom to be exempt. There is no question but that the contention so made is correct. Yates Co. N. Bank v. Carpenter, 119 N. Y. 551, 555; Freem. Exec., § 235. The judgment debtor is entitled to receive from said insurance company property equal to that destroyed or its value in money, and if it is paid in money then the said judgment debtor has a right within a reasonable time to retain the money for the purpose of replacing the property destroyed. Cooney v. Cooney, 65 Barb., 524. Nor will the court direct the insurance company to pay over the proceeds to a receiver of the judgment debtor appointed in proceedings supplementary to execution due to judgment debtor for damage to property exempt from levy under execution. Bliss v. *538Raynor, 91 Hun, 250; Cooney v. Cooney, 65 Barb. 524. The exemption as provided, under the statute is a humane provision in favor of families, and it is the duty of the courts to enforce its execution.

Motion granted.
No. 10-10754.

#### Howard *v.*Byars, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 76.981 Negative option billing. ( a ) A cable operator shall not charge a subscriber for any service or equipment that the subscriber has not affirmatively requested by name. A subscriber's failure to refuse a cable operator's proposal to provide such service or equipment is not an affirmative request for service or equipment. A subscriber's affirmative request for service or equipment may be made orally or in writing.
( b ) The requirements of paragraph (a) of this section shall not preclude the adjustment of rates to reflect inflation, cost of living and other external costs, the addition or deletion of a specific program from a service offering, the addition or deletion of specific channels from an existing tier or service, the restructuring or division of existing tiers of service, or the adjustment of rates as a result of the addition, deletion or substitution of channels pursuant to § 76.922, provided that such changes do not constitute a fundamental change in the nature of an existing service or tier of service and are otherwise consistent with applicable regulations.
( c ) State and local governments may not enforce state and local consumer protection laws that conflict with or undermine paragraph (a) or (b) of this section or any other sections of this Subpart that were established pursuant to Section 3 of the 1992 Cable Act, 47 U.S.C. 543.
[59 FR 62625, Dec. 6, 1994]
# ORIGINAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
PR 07-0011

IN THE MA11ER OF CALLING A RETIRED DISTRICT JUDGE TO ACTIVE SERVICE ORDER 

# FILED
MAY 1 5 2024

Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana Honorable Luke Berger, Judge ofthe District Court for the Fifth Judicial District of the State of Montana, has requested the assistance of retired District Judge Gregory R. Todd to assumejurisdiction ofMadison County CauseNo.DP-29-2019-28,In re theEstate ofBarry Rice. Judge Todd has retired under the provisions of the Montana Judges' Retirement System and, being subject to call for duty pursuant to § 19-5-103(a) and (b), MCA, has advised that he is agreeable to assisting the Fifth Judicial District Court with the above-listed matter. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Honorable Gregory R. Todd, retired District Judge, is hereby called to active service in the District Court ofthe Fifth Judicial District ofthe State ofMontana, to assume judicial authority ofMadison County Cause No. DP-29-2019-28, In re the Estate ofBarry Rice, and is hereby authorized to proceed with any and all necessary hearings, opinions, and orders, including final resolution ofsaid matter. 2. For all active service, Judge Todd shall be paid the salary compensation to which he is entitled by § 19-5-103(2)(b), MCA, and actual expenses, ifany, shall be reimbursed. 3. A copy of this Order shall be filed with the Clerk of Court of the Fifth Judicial District, Madison County, with the request that this Order be sent to all counsel of record in the above-listed matter. 05/15/2024

Case Number: PR 07-0011

### 4.A copy ofthisOrder shall alsobe furnished toHonorableLuke Berger,Honorable

Gregory R. Todd, and to Cathy Pennie, Office ofthe Supreme Court Administrator. The ChiefJustice enters this Order pursuant to Article VII, Section 6(3) ofthe 1972 Montana Constitution, and statutes enacted in conformity therewith and in implementation thereof. DATED this t day ofMay, 2024.

ChiefJustice

2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7808

CALVIN GOODMAN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WAYNE MCCABE, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Aiken. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. 

(1:13-cv-00594-RMG)

Submitted: February 27, 2014 Decided: March 5, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Calvin Goodman, Appellant Pro Se. Alphonso Simon, Jr., 

Assistant Attorney General, Donald John Zelenka, Senior 

Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Calvin Goodman seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. 

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Goodman has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            College of Information and Cyberspace
                    National Defense University
                CIC
        Search
                    Search CIC:
                        Search
                Search CIC:
                    Search
    Home

    About 
        Mission & Vision

    Faculty & Staff

    Fact Sheet

    Alumni

    Internships

    FAQ

    Admissions 
        Eligibility Requirements

    Admissions Calendar

    Application Instructions

    Apply Online

    International Students

    Academics 
        Graduate Catalog

    M.S. in Strategic Information and Cyberspace Studies
        
        JPME Master's Degree

    Cyber Workforce Master's Degree (Part Time)

    Leadership Development Programs

    Graduate Certificates

    Academic Partners

    Current Students 
        JPME II  Incoming Students

    LDP Incoming Students

    Student Registration

    Bring Your Own Device

    IA Compliance

    Completion Procedures / Order Transcripts

    Student Services and Resources

    Events
    
        Cyber Beacon

    Cyber PME Colloquium

    Hopper Award

    Lecture Series

    CYBERCOM Symposium

    NEWS

    UC2
    
        About

    Events

    Work With Us

    Center for Cybersecurity
    
        About

    Cybersecurity Center POC

    Cybersecurity Supporting Faculty

    CAE-CDE CISO Certificate Program

    Cybersecurity Trending News

    Cyber Labs
        
        Ethical Hacking

    Critical Infrastructure - SCADA

    Cyber Exercises
        
        Tabletop Exercise

    Cyber Competitions

    Cyber Resources and Awareness

    Stakeholder / Industry Advisory Council

    Contact 
        Contact Us

    Directions

    Access to Ft. McNair

    Map of Ft. McNair  Home
  NEWS
  News & Announcements
 News & Announcements News
 Professor Trawick Keynote Speaker on Cyber Education
 Prof George Trawick was invited as the keynote speaker for the   ISC2 Kentucky chapters regional meeting on 28 July 17  Prof. Trawick spoke to the audience of 100+ security professionals on the need for cyber education and community involvement.  Challenging each of them to be more than cyber operators and experts in their fields. He charged them with becoming cyber leaders, mentors, and teachers, to bring about a change to the cyber culture in their spheres of influence and  to realize that to defeat todays cyber threats, *the best mitigation is education.*
 SHARE
 PRINT
 National Defense University


College of Information and Cyberspace

300 Fifth Ave., Bldg. 62
Fort Lesley J. McNair
Washington, DC 20319-5066

202-685-6300
                    Stay Connected
                
                
                DOD Privacy & Security
 DOD Links Disclaimer
 DOD Social Media Policy
 DOD Web Policy
 FOIA
 NDU System of Records Notice
 NDU Privacy & Security Notice
 No FEAR Act
 Open GOV
 Plain Writing Act
 Section 508
 Small Business Act
 USA.gov
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 160 (Friday, August 18, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 47816]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7016]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4), and 552b(c)(6), as 
amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material, and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the contract applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel--SBIR topic 207 (Phase II), ``Multi-Purpose Radiophamaceutical 
Synthesis Platforms''.
    Date: September 5, 2006.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6130 Executive Blvd., EPN/
6053, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: C. Michael Kerwin, PhD, MPH, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Special Review and Logistics Branch, Division of 
Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 6116 
Executive Boulevard, Room 8057, Bethesda, MD 20892-8329, (301) 496-
7421, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#95fef0e7e2fcfbf8d5f8f4fcf9bbfbfcfdbbf2fae3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cda6a8bfbaa4a3a08da0aca4a1e3a3a4a5e3aaa2bb">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 14, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-7016 Filed 8-17-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### Re: It's in ROCIS - OPEI just confirmed. OMB should be able to see it and clear . Lydia Wegman to: James

_ A .

_ Laity 06/02/2010 07:50 PM Cc: "Tricia Crabtree", Joseph-J Dougherty Thanks a lot Jim. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Laity, James A." [James _A._Laity@omb.eop.gov] Sent: 06/02/2010 07:43 PM AST To: Lydia Wegman Subject: RE: It's in ROCIS - OPEI just confirmed. OMB should be able to see it and clear. Yes, now I need to cover a few process bases at my end. Will let you know as soon as it's cleared. --jim -----Original Message----- From: Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 7:39 PM To: Laity, James A. Subject: Fw: It's in ROCIS - OPEI just confirmed. OMB should be able to see it and clear. Jim, Do you have it? ----- Original Message ----- From: Joseph-J Dougherty Sent: 06/02/2010 07:36 PM EDT To: Lydia Wegman; Tricia Crabtree Subject: It's in ROCIS - OPEI just confirmed. OMB should be able to see it and clear.
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 4.2

                            SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE

     Reference is made to that certain Indenture, dated as of February 1, 1999,
by and among Oglebay Norton Company (formerly known as Oglebay Norton Holding
Company), a Delaware corporation ("Oglebay"), the guarantors party thereto and
NORWEST BANK MINNESOTA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee (the "Indenture").
Capitalized terms used without definition herein have the meanings given to them
in the Indenture.

          RECITALS:

     A.  Section 4.13 of the Indenture provides, inter alia., that "[i]f (a) the
Company or any Restricted Subsidiary shall organize, acquire or otherwise invest
in another Person that becomes a Restricted Subsidiary, or (b) any Restricted
Subsidiary that is not already a Guarantor shall become an obligor under the
Senior Credit Facility, then the Company shall cause such Restricted Subsidiary
to (i) execute and deliver to the Trustee a supplemental Indenture pursuant to
which such Restricted Subsidiary shall become a Guarantor..."

     B.  A Restricted Subsidiary has organized MLO Properties, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company, and MLO Properties, LLC is a Restricted Subsidiary
and is therefore required to become a Guarantor under the Indenture unless it is
designated as an Unrestricted Subsidiary;

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above premises, MLO Properties, LLC
agrees, for the benefit of the Holders, as follows:

     Effective with the date hereof, MLO Properties, LLC hereby expressly and
fully and unconditionally agrees to become a Guarantor under the Financing
Documents.

     The laws of the State of New York shall govern this Supplemental Indenture
without giving effect to any conflicts of law principles thereof.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Supplemental Indenture
to be duly executed, as of April 26, 2000.

     MLO PROPERTIES, LLC                 NORWEST BANK MINNESOTA,
                                         NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

     By: /s/ Rochelle F. Walk            By:
        ---------------------                --------------------
          Rochelle F. Walk               Title:
          Assistant Secretary                  ------------------
§ 54.101 Supported services for rural, insular, and high cost areas. ( a ) Voice telephony services shall be supported by Federal universal service support mechanisms. Eligible voice telephony services must provide voice grade access to the public switched network or its functional equivalent; minutes of use for local service provided at no additional charge to end users; access to the emergency services provided by local government or other public safety organizations, such as 911 and enhanced 911, to the extent the local government in an eligible carrier's service area has implemented 911 or enhanced 911 systems; and toll limitation services to qualifying low-income consumers as provided in subpart E of this part.
( b ) An eligible telecommunications carrier eligible to receive high-cost support must offer voice telephony service as set forth in paragraph (a) of this section in order to receive Federal universal service support.
( c ) An eligible telecommunications carrier (ETC) subject to a high-cost public interest obligation to offer broadband internet access services and not receiving Phase I frozen high-cost support must offer broadband services within the areas where it receives high-cost support consistent with the obligations set forth in this subpart and subparts D, K, L, and M of this part.
( d ) Any ETC must comply with subpart E of this part.
[86 FR 1021, Jan. 7, 2021]