alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Dean McCully Selected as NextGov Bold Award Finalist

/ Published Aug. 10, 2015

iCollege Leadership is proud to announce that Dean of Faculty and Academic Programs, Dr. Mary McCully, has been selected as one of 18 finalists for the NextGov 2015 Bold Awards from more than 100 nominations.  Dr. McCully was selected due to her outstanding leadership of the recently-developed iCollege Joint Professional Military Education (JPME) cyber-centric program.  Congratulations!!!  The awards -- now in their third year -- honor federal employees who’ve spearheaded the use of new technology, launched creative programs or otherwise taken risks to make the government run more more effectively.  The finalists hail from 15 different agencies. Also included are contenders for an award recognizing innovators in industry. This is the first time the Bold Awards has recognized individuals from the private sector.  

Click through the slideshow to view all the finalists (see Dr. McCully on Slide 13). 

Winners will be selected by the *Nextgov* editorial team and announced Sept. 9 at Nextgov Prime: Data, Cybersecurity and the Government of Tomorrow event in Washington, D.C.    Information provided for this news piece by Nextgov Staff.Inquiries about the iCollege should be directed to coopersmithp@ndu.edu .
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           8,460
<SECURITIES>                                    17,839
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,608
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,724
<PP&E>                                           4,464
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,959
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  30,410
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,323
<BONDS>                                            799
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       133,963
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,410
<SALES>                                         16,595
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,906
<CGS>                                            5,229
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,229
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,160
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 868
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (27,283)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (27,283)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.21)


</TABLE>
Llmbra 

BEH fueling operation FAA determination letter 

From : lisa lesperance <lisa.lesperance@faa.gov> 

Subject : BEH fueling operation FAA determination letter 

To : rmaguire@norwoodma.gov 

Good morning Russ--

Page 1 of 1 

Wed, Jul 17, 2013 08 :51 AM 

As you know, a FAA determination letter is the result of a review process based upon information 

received (by FAA) for a given proposal. The determination letter does not include the data that was 

submitted to FAA, so I just want to clarify what FAA reviewed and understand the operation to be. 

From the data submitted to us, it is our understanding the fuel tanks will be underground and "flush" 

if you will with the pavement and all venting of the fuel tanks will be along the hangar itself, therefore 

there is no OFA violation. Fuel trucks will park outside of the OFA (along the hangar side, 

somewhat between the 2 hangars), and a hose will run from the underground tanks to the trucks. 

The diagram sent included aircraft fueling to be in the same location as the parked fuel trucks 

(dispensing and loading). Given this information, it is FAA's understanding that no trucks or aircraft 

will be in the OFA, therefore, the determination was a "no objection" to this activity. 

I hope this helps, 

Lisa J. Lesperance 

Airport Planner- Massachusetts 

phone: 781-238-7616 

fax: 781-238-7608 

lisa.lesperance@faa.gov 

https://ncs.norwoodma.gov/h/printmessage?id=26041 &tz=America!New _York 4/9/2014
AFS-11-105-E 

Jan 20, 2011 

 Exemption No. 9807B 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2008-1222 

Mr. Eric Lampert 

Director of Operations 

NetJets Aviation, Inc. 

4111 Bridgeway Avenue 

Columbus, OH 43219 

Dear Mr. Lampert: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 9807, 

as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated December 15, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) on behalf of NetJets Aviation, Inc. (NJA) for an extension of Exemption No. 9807, as 

amended. That exemption from § 135.225(f) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations 

(14 CFR) allows NJA to make instrument flight rules (IFR) takeoffs from foreign and military 

airports when the visibility is less than 1 statute mile or make an instrument approach when 

the visibility is less than 1⁄2 mile. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to NJA. 
 2

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 9807, as 

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. 

Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition. All conditions and limitations of 

Exemption No. 9807, as amended, remain the same. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Provisions of this exemption apply to all turbojet-powered airplanes operated by NJA. 

2. Crews utilizing this exemption must have been trained and qualified to the standards 

specified under part 121, subparts N and O. 

3. Airports at which NJA intends to utilize the provisions of this exemption must have 

had approach procedures developed in accordance with U.S. Terminal Instrument 

Procedures or International Civil Aviation Organization Procedures for Air 

Navigations Services criteria. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 9807, as amended, to 

May 31, 2013 unless sooner superseded or rescinded. This letter must be attached to, and is a 

part of, Exemption No. 9807. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Raymond Towles 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service
No. 11-46.

#### Adar, Individually and as Parent and Next Friend of J. C. A-S, a Minor, et al. *v.*Smith, State Registrar and Director, Office of Vital Records and Statis*943tics, Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 80.929 Nameplate.

A durable nameplate must be mounted on the required radiotelephone equipment. When the transmitter and receiver comprise a single unit, one nameplate is sufficient. The nameplate must show the name of the manufacturer and the type or model number.
Exhibit 10.1 Amendment Letter


    Exhibit
      10.1

    


    March
      14,
      2007

    


    


    


    


    


    OSI
      Restaurant Partners, Inc.

    2202
      North Westshore Blvd., 5th
      Floor

    Tampa,
      Florida 33607

    Attention:
      Dirk A. Montgomery

    


    


    
      	 	
              Re:

            	
              Credit
                Agreement dated as of October 12, 2006 between OSI Restaurant Partners,
                Inc. and Wachovia Bank, National Association (the “Credit Agreement”).
                Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings
                given in the Credit Agreement.

            


    

    


    Ladies
      and Gentlemen:

    


    This
      letter confirms the agreement of Wachovia Bank, National Association to amend
      and restate the definition of “Termination Date” contained in Section 1.01 of
      the Credit Agreement as follows: “Termination
      Date” means May 30, 2007.

    


    Nothing
      contained herein shall waive, annul, vary or affect any provision, condition,
      covenant or agreement contained in the Credit Agreement, except as set forth
      above, nor affect or impair any rights, powers or remedies under the Credit
      Agreement. The Borrower and Guarantors shall pay all expenses of the Bank
      including reasonable fees and disbursements of special counsel for the Bank
      in
      connection with the preparation of this letter.

    


    


                         Very
      truly yours,

    


     

                                           WACHOVIA
      BANK, NATIONAL
      ASSOCIATION

    


    


                                            By:
/s/
      Lynn E.
      Culbreath______________ (SEAL)

                                            Lynn
      E. Culbreath,
      Senior Vice President

     

     

     

    WCSR
      3564460v2
EX-10.54



 





Exhibit 10.54




AMENDMENT TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




     This Amendment to Employment
Agreement, entered into as of this 9th day of January, 2007, is
made effective January 1, 2007 and amends that certain Employment Agreement by and between NYMAGIC,
INC., a New York corporation (together with its successors and assigns, the “Company”) and A.
George Kallop (the “Executive”), entered into as of the 17th day of April 2006, and made
effective October 1, 2005.



     1. Section 3 is hereby amended to read as follows:



     “3. Base Salary.



     The Executive shall be paid an annualized salary, payable in accordance with the regular
payroll practices of the Company, of not less than $450,000, subject to review for increase at the
discretion of the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board (“Base Salary”).”



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement as of the date first written
above.



	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	NYMAGIC, INC.
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:	 	/s/ Paul J. Hart 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name:	 	Paul J. Hart 
	 

	 	Title:	 	Attorney-in-fact
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	THE EXECUTIVE
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/ A. George Kallop
	 	 	 
	 	 	A. George Kallop
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

CRYSTAL PHARMACEUTICAL (SUZHOU) CO., 

LTD., BERGEN PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC,

Appellants

v.

EISAI INC.,

Appellee

______________________ 

2023-1017

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. PGR2021-

00047.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

JOHN SCOTT MCBRIDE, Bartlit Beck LLP, Chicago, IL, 

argued for all appellants. Appellant Bergen Pharmaceutical, LLC also represented by MEG E. FASULO, KATHERINE 

E. RHOADES; TAYLOR JAMES KELSON, Denver, CO; ADAM 

MORTARA, Chicago, IL. 

 SCOTT A. CUNNING, II, Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein 

LLP, Washington, DC, for appellant Crystal Pharmaceutical (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. Also represented by ELIZABETH 

Case: 23-1017 Document: 55 Page: 1 Filed: 09/06/2024
CROMPTON; CECIL KYLE MUSGROVE, Gemini Law LLP, New 

York, NY. 

 MELANIE R. RUPERT, Paul Hastings LLP, New York, 

NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by CHRISTOPHER 

P. HILL, YOUNG J. PARK, BRUCE M. WEXLER; NAVEEN MODI,

MICHAEL WOLFE, Washington, DC.

 ______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, LINN and PROST,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 6, 2024

Date

Case: 23-1017 Document: 55 Page: 2 Filed: 09/06/2024
MEMORANDUM

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0790

FROM: Mary Johnson, EPA/OAR/OAQPS/SPPD

DATE: November 2012

SUBJECT: National Renderers Association July 15, 2011 Letter

Area Source Industrial/Commercial/Institutional 

Boilers

The National Renderers Association (NRA) submitted to the EPA 

Air and Radiation Docket a letter dated July 15, 2011 that 

requested changes to the Area Source Boiler Rule. The NRA 

asserted that their requested changes must be considered because 

the EPA changed the definition for liquid fuels in the final 

rule from the proposed rule without an opportunity for comment. 

The NRA stated their belief that the EPA should determine that 

processed fats are a separate non-petroleum liquid fuel and that 

processed fats are not subject to regulation under subpart 

JJJJJJ. Specifically, the NRA requested a new processed fatsfired boiler unit definition in subpart JJJJJJ, analogous to 

gas-fired boilers.

The definition of liquid fuel in the March 21, 2011 final rule 

(76 FR 15554) included another example of liquid fuel (i.e., 

liquid biofuels) and clarified that the definition was not 

limited to only those examples of liquid fuels cited (i.e., 

means, but not limited to). We note that the submittal of 

comments by the NRA on the 2010 proposed rule (EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-

0790-0937) indicate that the NRA was on notice that processed 

fats-fired boilers may have been subject to the provisions of 

the Area Source Boiler Rule.

In the June 10, 2010 proposed rule notice (75 FR 31896), the EPA 

explained the basis for defining gas-fired boilers as not being 

part of the source category. Comparisons of processed fats-fired 

boilers to gas-fired boilers could have been raised during the 

public comment period for the initial rulemaking. In its 

comments on the proposed rule (EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0790-0937), the 

NRA recognized that processed fats-fired boilers were covered by 

the Area Source Boiler Rule but did not suggest that those
boilers should have been treated in a way that is analogous to 

gas-fired boilers. 

Upon consideration of the issues raised by the NRA in the July 

15, 2011, letter, the content of the notices described above, 

and the NRA’s timely comments on the June 2010 proposed rule, we 

deem its letter to be a request for reconsideration and deny its 

request. We conclude that the NRA has not demonstrated that its 

objections to the rule could not have been raised in the comment 

period nor has it established that the issue arose after the 

comment period but within 60 days of publication of the final 

rule.
[Crim. No. 319.

Second Appellate District.

January 2, 1914.]

#### In the Matter of the Application of RICHARD WATTS BURNER, a Minor, for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.

Juvenile Court—Commitment of Dependent Minor—Absence of Jurisdiction—Habeas Corpus.—Where a petition, praying that a minor be taken into custody as a dependent child, fails to state •any of the facts required by statute to constitute the child a dependent, an order of the juvenile court eomitting him to the custody of the probation officer is without jurisdiction and the child will be released on *habeas corpus.,*

APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus on behalf of minor in custody under an order of the juvenile court.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

So Relle & Cruickshank, for Petitioner.

Shreve & Shreve, for Respondents.

THE COURT.

The petitioner, the father of Richard Watts Burner, applied for this writ on the ground that the respondents, the judge of the superior court of San Diego County, sitting as judge of the juvenile court, and the probation officer of the juvenile court, were detaining said minor child and restraining him of his liberty without any right or authority so to do. The return shows that said child is in the custody of the probation officer by virtue of a commitment issued out of said juvenile court which is based upon a petition praying that said child be taken into custody as a dependent child. No facts such as are required by the statute to constitute said child a dependent child are stated in the petition. The order was made without jurisdiction, and said Richard Watts Burner is hereby ordered to be discharged from the custody of such probation officer.
Exhibit 7.1

TELÉFONOS DE MÉXICO, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

RATIOS OF EARNINGS
TO FIXED CHARGES

Millions of Mexican pesos (Except Ratios)



|                                            |  |      |          |  |      |  |          | 
|------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | -------- |  | ---- |  | -------- | 
|                                            |  | 2011 |          |  | 2010 | 
|IFRS:                                       |  |      |          |  |      |  |          | 
|Profit before income tax                    |  |      | P.21,936 |  |      |  | P.23,501 | 
|Less:                                       |  |      |          |  |      |  |          | 
|Equity interest in net profit of affiliates |  |      | 115      |  |      |  | 196      | 
|Plus:                                       |  |      |          |  |      |  |          | 
|Fixed charges:                              |  |      |          |  |      |  |          | 
|Interest expense                            |  |      | 4,942    |  |      |  | 5,732    | 
|                                            |  |      |          |  |      |  |          | 
|Earnings under IFRS                         |  |      | P.26,763 |  |      |  | P.29,037 | 
|                                            |  |      |          |  |      |  |          | 
|RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES:        |  |      | 5.4      |  |      |  | 5.1      | 
|                                            |  |      |          |  |      |  |          |
<PAGE>
Exhibit 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Celadon Group, Inc.
Registration Statement 333-14641 on Form S-8 pertaining to the Employee Stock
Purchase Plan dated October 23, 1996, Registration Statement 333-42209 on Form
S-8 pertaining to the Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan dated December 12,
1997, and Registration Statements 333-42207 and 333-31164 on Form S-8 pertaining
to the 1994 Stock Option Plan dated December 12, 1997 and February 25, 2000,
respectively, of our report dated August 9, 2002 (except for Note 13, as to
which the date is September 27, 2002), with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Celadon Group, Inc. included in the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2002.



                                         /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana
September 27, 2002
<PAGE>


Exhibit 99.2


                        CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of MIV Therapeutics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months ending February 29, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Patrick McGowan, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.




s/Patrick McGowan
--------------------
Patrick McGowan, CFO
April 14, 2004
#### § 30.301 Upper Microwave Flexible Use Service subject to competitive bidding.

Mutually exclusive initial applications for Upper Microwave Flexible User Service licenses are subject to competitive bidding. The general competitive bidding procedures set forth in part 1, subpart Q of this chapter will apply unless otherwise provided in this subpart.
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4647 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4647

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
   To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey to the City of 
Imperial Beach, California, approximately 1 acre of land in the Tijuana 
                    Slough National Wildlife Refuge.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF LAND IN TIJUANA SLOUGH NATIONAL WILDLIFE 
              REFUGE.

    (a) Requirement.--The Secretary of the Interior shall expeditiously 
convey to the City of Imperial Beach, California, without compensation, 
all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to 
approximately 1 acre of land in the Tijuana Slough National Wildlife 
Refuge,
as depicted on a United States Fish and Wildlife Service map entitled 
``T-ball Field, Tijuana Slough National Wildlife Refuge'', dated June 
1994, for use as a public recreational area.
    (b) Reversionary Interest in the United States.--Upon any date on 
which any of the land in which right, title, and interest is conveyed 
under subsection (a) ceases to be used by the City of Imperial Beach, 
California, for public recreational purposes--
            (1) all such right, title, and interest shall revert to the 
        Government of the United States; and
            (2) such land shall be reincorporated into the Tijuana 
        Slough National Wildlife Refuge.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 12, 1994.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.
                                     







103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4647

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey to the City of 
Imperial Beach, California, approximately 1 acre of land in the Tijuana 
                    Slough National Wildlife Refuge.`