51850 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 169 / Thursday, August 31, 2006 / Notices 

1The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 

2Commissioner Deanna Tanner Okun not 

participating. 

3Chairman Daniel R. Pearson dissenting. 

4Commissioner Charlotte R. Lane dissenting. 

5Commissioners Stephen Koplan and Charlotte 

R. Lane dissenting. 

6The schedule of the Commission’s reviews and 

of the public hearing was revised on December 9, 

2005 (70 FR 75482, December 20, 2005) and on May 

4, 2006 (71 FR 27513, May 11, 2006). 

Representatives of any other Indian 

tribe that believes itself to be culturally 

affiliated with the unassociated funerary 

objects should contact Dr. Peter Lape, 

Burke Museum, University of 

Washington, Box 353010, Seattle, WA 

98195–3010, telephone (206) 685–2282, 

October 2, 2006. Repatriation of the 

unassociated funerary objects to the 

Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla 

Reservation, Oregon may proceed after 

that date if no additional claimants 

come forward. 

The Burke Museum is responsible for 

notifying the Confederated Tribes of the 

Umatilla Reservation, Oregon that this 

notice has been published. 

Dated: August 14, 2006. 

Sherry Hutt, 

Manager, National NAGPRA Program. 

[FR Doc. 06–7278 Filed 8–30–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–50–M 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–344, 391–A, 

392–A and C, 393–A, 394–A, 396, and 399–

A (Second Review)] 

Certain Bearings From China, France, 

Germany, Italy, Japan, Singapore, and 

the United Kingdom 

Determinations 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject five-year reviews, the 

United States International Trade 

Commission (Commission) determines,2

pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the 

Act), that revocation of the antidumping 

duty orders on the following types of 

bearings from China, France, Germany, 

Japan, and the United Kingdom would 

be likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of material injury to an 

industry in the United States within a 

reasonably foreseeable time. 

Product Country Investigation No. 

Tapered roller bearings ........................................................................................... China 3 .................................................... 731–TA–344 

Ball bearings ............................................................................................................ France .................................................... 731–TA–392–A 

Ball bearings ............................................................................................................ Germany ................................................ 731–TA–391–A 

Ball bearings ............................................................................................................ Italy ......................................................... 731–TA–393–A 

Ball bearings ............................................................................................................ Japan ..................................................... 731–TA–394–A 

Ball bearings ............................................................................................................ United Kingdom ..................................... 731–TA–399–A 

The Commission also determines that 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

orders on the following types of 

bearings from France and Singapore 

would not be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of material 

injury to an industry in the United 

States within a reasonably foreseeable 

time. 

Product Country Investigation No. 

Ball bearings ............................................................................................................ Singapore 4 ............................................. 731–TA–396 

Spherical plain bearings .......................................................................................... France 5 .................................................. 731–TA–392–C 

Background 

The Commission instituted these 

reviews on June 1, 2005 (70 FR 31531) 

and determined on September 7, 2005 

that it would conduct full reviews (70 

FR 54568, September 15, 2005). Notice 

of the scheduling of the Commission’s 

reviews and of a public hearing to be 

held in connection therewith was given 

by posting copies of the notice in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 

Washington, DC, and by publishing the 

notice in the Federal Register on 

October 18, 2005 (70 FR 60556).6 The 

hearing was held in Washington, DC, on 

May 2, 2006, and all persons who 

requested the opportunity were 

permitted to appear in person or by 

counsel. 

The Commission transmitted its 

determination in this review to the 

Secretary of Commerce on August 25, 

2006. The views of the Commission are 

contained in USITC Publication 3876 

(August 2006), entitled Certain Bearings 

from China, France, Germany, Italy, 

Japan, Singapore, and the United 

Kingdom: Investigation Nos. 731–TA–

344, 391–A, 392–A and C, 393–A, 394–

A, and 399–A (Second Review). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: August 28, 2006. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 06–7350 Filed 8–30–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent 

Decree 

In accordance with Departmental 

Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby 

given that a proposed Consent Decree in 

United States v. Howard McKenzie & 

EBT Property Holding Co., Inc., No. 

2:06–CV–02353, was lodged with the 

United States District Court for the 

District of South Carolina on August 23, 

2006. 

The proposed Consent Decree 

concerns a compliant filed by the 

United States against Howard McKenzie 

& EBT Property Holding Co., Inc., 

pursuant to sections 301 and 404 of the 

Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1311 and 

1344, with respect to Defendants’

alleged violations of the Clean Air Act 

by discharging pollutants into waters of 


erjones on PROD1PC72 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 169 / Thursday, August 31, 2006 / Notices 51851 

the United States without a permit. The 

proposed Consent Decree resolves these 

allegations by requiring the restoration 

of the wetlands at issue and the 

payment of a civil penalty. The 

Department of Justice will accept 

written comments relating to this 

proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) 

days from the date of publication of this 

Notice. Please address comments to 

Marvin J. Caughman, Assistant United 

States Attorney, Wachovia Building, 

Suite 500, 1441 Main Street, Columbia, 

South Carolina 29201 and refer to 

United States v. Howard McKenzie & 

EBT Property Holding Co., Inc., No. 

2:06–CV–02353. 

The proposed Consent Decree may be 

examined at the Clerk’s Office, United 

States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, United States 

Courthouse, 901 Richland Lane, 

Columbia, South Carolina. In addition, 

the proposed Consent Decree may be 

viewed at http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 

open.html. 

Stephen Samuels, 

Assistant Chief, Environmental Defense 

Section, Environment & Natural Resources 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 06–7265 Filed 8–30–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–M 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree 

Pursuant to the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation and Liability Act 

Notice is hereby given that on 

August 23, 2006 a proposed Consent 

Decree in United States v. Mallinckrodt 

et. al, Civil Action No. 4:02CV1488, was 

lodged with the United States District 

Court for the Eastern District of 

Missouri. In this action the United 

States sought recovery of response costs 

incurred by the Environmental 

Protection Agency at the Great Lakes 

Container Corporation Superfund Site 

located in St. Louis, Missouri. The 

Consent Decree requires Defendant 

Shell Oil Company to reimburse the 

United States $228,630.00 in response 

costs. 

The Department of Justice will receive 

for a period of thirty (30) days from the 

date of this publication comments 

relating to the Consent Decree. 

Comments should be addressed to the 

Assistant Attorney General, 

Environment and Natural Resources 

Division, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611, and should refer to United 

States v. Mallinckrodt, et. al. D.J. Ref. 

90–11–3–07280. The Consent Decree 

may be examined at the Office of the 

United States Attorney, Thomas F. 

Eagleton U.S. Courthouse, 111 South 

10th Street, 20th Floor, St. Louis, MO 

63102, and at U.S. EPA Region VII, 901 

North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas 

66025. During the public comment 

period, the Consent Decree may also be 

examined on the following Department 

of Justice Web site, to http://www/ 

usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_Decree.html. A 

copy of the Consent Decree may also be 

obtained by mail from the Consent 

Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611 or by faxing or e-mailing a 

request to Tonia Fleetwood 

(tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax no. 

(202) 514–0097, phone confirmation 

number (202) 514–1547. In requesting a 

copy from the Consent Decree Library, 

please enclose a check in the amount of 

$4.75 (without attachments) or $5.75 

(with attachments) for United States v. 

Mallinckrodt, et al. (25 cents per page 

reproduction cost) payable to the U.S. 

Treasury. 

Bruce Gelber, 

Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement 

Section, Environment and Natural Resources 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 06–7295 Filed 8–30–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–M 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Extension of Comment 

Period on Consent Decree Under the 

Clean Water Act 

Under 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby 

given that the comment period for the 

purposed Consent Decree lodged on 

June 22, 2006, with the United States 

District Court for the District of Puerto 

Rico in United States v. Puerto Rico 

Aqueduct and Sewer Authority 

(PRASA), Civil Action No. 06–1624 

(SEC), is being extended from August 7, 

2006 through September 15, 2006. The 

original notice of this proposed 

settlement, which summarizes the 

settlement and identifies where copies 

of the Consent Decree may be obtained, 

was published in the Federal Register 

on July 7, 2006, Vol. 71, No. 130, Pg. 

38660–38661. Comments should be 

addressed to the Assistant Attorney 

General of the Environment and Natural 

Resources Division, Department of 

Justice, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department 

of Justice, Washington, DC 20004–7611, 

and should refer to United States v. 

PRASA, Civil Action No. 06–1624 

(SEC), D.J. Ref. 90–5–1–1–08385, and 

should be received by September 15, 

2006. 

Bruce S. Gelber, 

Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, 

Environment and Natural Resources Division. 

[FR Doc. 06–7296 Filed 8–30–06; 8:45am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–M 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree 

Under the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Act 

Notice is hereby given that on August 

15, 2006, a proposed Consent Decree in 

United States v. The Sherwin-Williams 

Company et al., Civil Action Number 

00–2064, was lodged with the United 

States District Court for the Central 

District of Illinois. 

The proposed consent decree resolves 

claims against The Sherwin-Williams 

Company, The Glidden Company, and 

Speciality Coatings Company, Inc. 

(collectively, ‘‘Defendants’’), under 

Section 107 of the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Act 

(‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9607, for the 

reimbursement of response costs 

incurred and to be incurred by EPA, in 

connection with the release and 

threatened release of hazardous 

substances at the Cross Brothers Pail 

Recycling Superfund Site in Pembroke 

Township, Kankakee County, Illinois 

(‘‘the Site’’). 

Under the proposed Consent Decree, 

Defendants will reimburse the United 

States $200,000 in outstanding past 

response costs at the Site. 

The Department of Justice will 

receive, for a period of thirty (30) days 

from the date of this publication, 

comments relating to the Consent 

Decree. Comments should be addressed 

to the Assistant Attorney General, 

Environment and Natural Resources 

Division, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611, with a copy to Matthew A. 

Fogelson, Trial Attorney, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division, 

Environmental Enforcement Section, 

301 Howard Street, Suite 1050, San 

Francisco, CA 94105, and should refer 

to United States v. The SherwinWilliams Company et al., DOJ Ref. #90–

11–2–477/1. Commenters may request 

an opportunity for a public meeting in 

the affected area, in accordance with 

Section 7003(d) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 

6973(d). 

The Consent Decree may be examined 

at the Office of the United States 


erjones on PROD1PC72 with NOTICES