# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 9 D0 28 7 . ALFONZ A MCKEEVER v . THE STATE.

Th e t ri al co u rt o rd ere d A l f o n za M cKeev er, wh o i s p ro ceed i n g p ro s e, to

co o perat e wi t h an e v al u at i o n b y t h e Dep art m en t o f Beh av i o ral Heal t h an d

Dev el o pm en t al Di s ab i l i t i es (“ DBHDD”), an d al s o fo un d h i m co m p et en t t o st an d t ri al

o n cri m i n al ch arg es

. M cKeev er t h en fi l ed a no t i ce o f a n eu ro p s y ch o l o g i cal ev al u at i o n

o f h i m s el f. Th e t ri al co u rt ru l ed th at

, t o t h e d eg ree th at t h e n o t i ce o f t h e

n eu ro p s y ch o l o g ical ev al u at i o n was i n t en ded t o i n d icat e M cKeev er’ s co m pet en ce o r

cri m i n al res p o n s i b i l i t y

, i t was ex cl u d ed b ecau s e McKeev er h ad n o t co m p l i ed wi t h i t s

p ri o r o rd er t o co o p erat e wi t h DBHDD. M cKeev er al s o fi l ed a “ req u es t fo r ex t en s i o n

o f t i m e t o fi l e, p l ai n t i ff d el ay o f d o cu m en t s an d [t ran s cri pt s ,] au d i o reco rd i n g

, g ran t

d ep os i t i o n fro m al l co -d efen d ers an d accu s ers ,” w h i ch t h e t ri al co u rt den i ed

, n o t i n g

t h at t h e tri al was s et fo r Jan uary 1 4

, 2 0 1 9

. M cKeev er t h ereaft er fi l ed t h i s ap p l i cat i o n

fo r d i s cret i o nary rev i ew. Al t h o u g h M cKeev er’s a p p l i cat i on an d s u p pl em en t al

ap p li cat io n are s o m ewh at u n c l e a r

, i t ap p ears t h at h e i s ch al l en g i ng t h e tri al co urt ’ s

d en ial o f h i s req u es t fo r an ex ten s i o n o f t i m e an d t h e ex cl u s io n o f h i s n ot i ce o f t h e

ev al u at i on

. 1 W e, h o wev er, l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n

.

It i s cl ear fro m t h e t ri al co u rt ’s o r d e r s t h at t h e cas e rem ai n s p en d i n g b el o w.

Th erefo re, t h e o rd ers t h at M cKeev er wi s h es t o ap p eal are i n terl o cu t o ry i n n at u re, an d

1 I n d e e d

, t h es e o rd ers are t h e o n l y recen t t ri al co u rt ord ers i n t h e ap p l i cat i o n

m at eri al s

. See Co u rt o f A p peal s Ru l e 3 1 (c) (p ro v i d i n g th at d i scret i o nary ap p l i cat i on s

m u st co n t ai n a co p y o f t h e t ri al co urt ’ s o rd e r o r j u d g m en t fro m wh i ch t he ap p eal i s

s o u g ht ). February 05, 2019h e was req u i red to fo l l o w t h e i n t erl o cu t o ry ap p l i cat i o n pro ced u re s et fo rt h i n OCGA

§ 5 -6 -3 4 (b ), wh ich i n cl u d es o b t ai n i n g a cert i fi cat e o f im m ed i at e rev iew fro m t h e t ri al

co u rt

. B a i l e

y v

. Ba il ey

, 2 6 6 G a. 8 3 2

, 8 3 3 (4 7 1 SE2 d 21 3 ) (1 9 9 6 ); Scr u g g s v. Ga

.

Dep t. o f Hu ma n Res o u r c e s

, 2 6 1 Ga. 5 8 7

, 5 8 8 -5 8 9 (1 ) (4 0 8 SE2 d 1 0 3 ) (1 9 9 1 ).

M cKeev er’ s fai l u re t o co m p l y wi t h t h e i n t erl o cu t ory rev i ew p ro ced u re d ep ri v es u s o f

ju ri s d i ct i o n o v er t h is ap p l i cat i o n , wh i ch i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.

W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 02/05/2019