alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [WY-920-1320-EL, WYW172929]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

      ( print page 52571)    

# ACTION:

Notice of invitation for coal exploration license application, Jacobs Ranch Coal Company, WYW172929, Wyoming; correction. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Bureau of Land Management published in the                         **Federal Register**                         of August 18, 2006, (71 FR 47826) a notice inviting all interested parties to participate with Jacobs Ranch Coal Company on a                         *pro rata*                         cost sharing basis in its program for the exploration of coal deposits owned by the United States of America. Inadvertently, the following lands included in the exploration license application were omitted from the notice.                    

T. 44 N., R. 70 W., 6th P.M. Wyoming

Sect 22: Lots 1-3, 5-10, 12-15.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Any party electing to participate in this exploration program must send written notice to both the Bureau of Land Management and Jacobs Ranch Coal Company no later than thirty days after publication of this invitation in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

August 21, 2006.

Alan Rabinoff,

Deputy State Director, Minerals and Lands.

[FR Doc. 06-7430 Filed 9-5-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-22-M
No. 92-8680.

#### Paul v. Jet Aviation Management AG, Switzerland, et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### FRANCIS T. WALTON, Respondent, *v.*PHILIP DALY, Appellant. SAME *v.*SAME.

*One undertaking cannot be given to discharge two attachments, issued in different actions.*

Appeal from an order made at Special Term setting aside an undertaking given by the defendant to procure the discharge of two attachments, one of said attachments having been issued in each of the above entitled actions, on the ground that the plaintiff was entitled to a separate undertaking in each action.

The court at General Term said : “We entertain no doubt that there is' no precedent, nor authority for accepting, as sufficient under the provisions of the Code, one undertaking in two actions for the purpose of discharging an attachment issued in each action. The undertaking is one provided by the Code, and is required to *602be given in each action, and to relate to each attachment. It was therefore without warrant to present an undertaking, embracing both actions and relating to both attachments, for the purpose of having the property discharged. This proposition is, we think, so plain that it is not necessary to say anything *in extenso*about it.”

*Childs (&*Hull, for the appellant. *J. A.*8houdy, for the respondent.

Opinion

Per *Curiam.*

Present — Bbady, P. J., and Ingalls, J.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
```

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 167 (Tuesday, August 29, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 51221]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7258]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD

Sunshine Act Meeting

Agenda

Time and Date: 9:30 a.m., Wednesday, September 6, 2006.

Place: NTSB Conference Center, 429 L'Enfant Plaza SW, Washington, DC 
20594.

Status: The one item is open to the public.

Matter to be Considered: 5299U, Most Wanted Safety Recommendations 
Program--2006 Update on State Issues.

News Media Contact: Keith Holloway, telephone: (202) 314-6100.
    Individuals requesting specific accommodations should contact Chris 
Bisett at (202) 314-6305 by Friday, September 1, 2006.
    The public may view the meeting via a live or archived Web cast by 
accessing a link under News & Events on the NTSB home page at 
http:\\www.ntsb.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vicky D'Onofrio, (202) 314-6410.

    Dated: August 25, 2006.
Vicky D'Onofrio,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 06-7258 Filed 8-25-06; 2:04 pm]
BILLING CODE 7533-01-M
```
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4761

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize educational assistance

for alternative teacher certification programs, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 14, 1994

Mr. TEJEDA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize educational assistance for alternative teacher certification

programs, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ALTERNATIVE TEACHER CERTIFICATION

4 PROGRAMS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3452(c) of title 38,

6 United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the

7 following: ‘‘For the period ending on September 30, 1996,

8 such term includes entities that provide training required

9 for completion of any State-approved alternative teacher

10 certification program (as determined by the Secretary).’’.
2

•HR 4761 IH

1 (b) CLARIFYING AMENDMENT.—Section 3002 of title

2 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end

3 thereof the following:

4 ‘‘(8) The term ‘educational institution’ has the

5 meaning given such term in section 3452(c) of this

6 title.’’.

7 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

8 this section shall be effective on the date of enactment of

9 this Act.

Æ
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interactive Intelligence,Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Stephen R. Head, Chief Financial Officer, Vice President of Finance andAdministration, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Stephen R. Head                                                                                                                                             |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Stephen R. Head                                                                                                                                                 |
| Chief Financial Officer, Vice President of Finance  and Administration, Secretary and Treasurer  (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
| May 10, 2005                                                                                                                                                    |

 

----
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                     (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              YEAR ENDED MARCH 31
                                                              --------------------
                                                                2001        2000
                                                              --------    --------
<S>                                                           <C>         <C>
BASIC COMPUTATION
Net income (loss)...........................................  $(7,671)    $   479
                                                              =======     =======
Weighted average shares outstanding.........................   21,472      16,462
                                                              =======     =======
Net income (loss) per common share..........................  $ (0.36)    $  0.03

DILUTED COMPUTATION
Weighted average shares.....................................   21,472      16,462
Effect of dilutive securities:
  Employee stock options....................................       --       1,218
  Warrants..................................................       --         377
                                                              -------     -------
Diluted shares..............................................   21,472      18,057
                                                              =======     =======
Net income (loss) per common share..........................  $ (0.36)    $  0.03
</TABLE>
#### Wayne T. ZIEGLER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, NT & SA; et al., Defendants—Appellees, and George W. Coombes, Jr.; et al., Defendants.

No. 03-15315.

D.C. No. CV-00-00188-CW.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 12, 2004.*

Decided May 28, 2004.

Wayne T. Ziegler, Houston, TX, pro se.

Arne D. Wagner, Somnath Raj Chatterjee, Morrison & Foerster, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for D efendant-App ellee.

Before O’SCANNLAIN, SILER,** and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2)(C).

**

 The Honorable Eugene E. Siler, Jr., Senior United States Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM***

Wayne T. Ziegler appeals from the district court’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal of his claims against Bank of America (“the Bank”).

Ziegler admits that he purposely failed to disclose the potential causes of action arising from disputes regarding the Bank’s administration of his accounts on *820the schedule of assets he filed in connection with his Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition. This breach of his affirmative duty to schedule assets and liabilities estops him from litigating causes of actions concealed from his creditors and the bankruptcy trustee. *See First Nat’l Bank of Jacksboro v. Lasater,*196 U.S. 115, 119, 25 S.Ct. 206, 49 L.Ed. 408 (1905). We therefore conclude that the district court did not err in dismissing the four claims relating to Ziegler’s accounts.

Ziegler’s claim alleging a conspiracy between the Bank and the operators of a self-storage facility is identical to a Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (“RICO”) claim advanced by Ziegler and dismissed with prejudice in an earlier action against the Bank in the Central District of California. Such dismissal constitutes a final judgment on the merits for purposes of res judicata. *See Stewart v. U.S. Bancorp,*297 F.3d 953, 957 (9th Cir. 2002). We conclude that the district court properly dismissed the conspiracy claim as barred by res judicata. *See id.*at 956.

Ziegler’s claim under RICO arises from the “same transaction or series of transactions” that gave rise to claims dismissed with prejudice in actions in both the Central District of California and the Southern District of Texas. *See W. Sys. Inc. v. Ulloa,*958 F.2d 864, 871 (9th Cir.1992). We therefore hold that res judicata also bars the RICO claim.

Ziegler’s constitutional challenge to California’s “vexatious litigant” statute, *see*Cal.Civ.Proc.Code § 391, was never pleaded as an independent cause of action in the district court below. Because the claim is raised for the first time on appeal, we decline to address it. *See Bolker v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue,*760 F.2d 1039, 1042 (9th Cir.1985).

Ziegler’s request for publication is DENIED.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
SCWC

- 19

- 0000307

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I

________________________________________________________________

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR MASTR ADJUSTABLE RATE MORTGAGES TRUST 2006

- 0A1, MORTGAGE PASS

- THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006

- 0A1, Respondent/Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant

- Appellee,

vs.

MICHAEL DAVID GOYNE, Petitioner/Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff/Cross

- Claim Plaintiff/Cross

- Claim Defendant

- Appellant, and AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE, Respondent/Defendant/Cross

- Claim Defendant

- Appellee, and ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF KO OLINA KAI GOLF ESTATES & VILLAS, Respondent/Defendant/Cross

- Claim Plaintiff/ Counterclaim Plaintiff

- Appellee,

and KO OLINA COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC.; CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA), N.A.; and CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A., Respondents/Defendants/Cross

- Claim Defendants

- Appellees. and HOLDEN KAMUELA KAYA LAU and EMILY COLLEEN WO, Respondents/Intervenors

- Appellees.

_______________________________________________________________ _

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP

- 19

- 0000 307 ; C IVIL NO

. 1CC 151000441 ) Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-19-0000307 16-NOV-2023 08:08 AM Dkt. 22 ODAC2 ORDER REJECT ING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, and Eddins, JJ., Circuit Judge Chang and Circuit Judge Wong , assigned by reason of vacanc ies )

The application for writ of certiorari filed on October 6 , 2023, by Petitioner / Defendant

- Appellant Michael David Goyne is
hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ‘ i, November 16 , 2023.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
/s/ Gary W.B. Chang
/s/ Paul B.K. Wong
32.1     Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of Genesis Capital
         Corporation of Nevada pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act
         of 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form  10-QSB/A of Genesis  Capital
Corporation  of Nevada (the  "Company")  for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  the undersigned  Richard Astrom,  Chief Executive Officer of Genesis
Capital Corporation of Nevada,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: September 21, 2006

                                      /s/ RICHARD ASTROM
                                      -----------------------
                                      Richard Astrom
                                      Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT
 TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
 ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report
 of Zap.Com Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
 September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
 hereof (the Report), Leonard DiSalvo, as the Chief Financial Officer
 of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
 pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to the best of my knowledge,
 that:



|(3) |  | The Report fully complies with
 the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                        
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |  |                                                                                                                                                      
|(4) |  | The information
 contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
 condition and result of operations of the Company.



|/s/ Leonard
 DiSalvo                                  | 
|----------------------------------------------------- | 
|                                                      | 
|Leonard DiSalvo                                       | 
|Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial
 Officer
|November 13,
 2002                                    | 

This Certification accompanies this Report
 pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed
 filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
 1934, as amended.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 496 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 496

To amend the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 1930, to prevent 
    the imputation to cooperatives of conduct by their members and 
affiliates for the purposes of the prohibition relating to labelling of 
                          certain commodities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 21, 1993

  Mr. Condit introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 1930, to prevent 
    the imputation to cooperatives of conduct by their members and 
affiliates for the purposes of the prohibition relating to labelling of 
                          certain commodities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Perishable Agricultural Commodities 
Amendment Act of 1992''.

SEC. 2. CERTAIN CONDUCT OF MEMBERS AND AFFILIATES NOT TO BE IMPUTED TO 
              COOPERATIVES.

    Section 2 of the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 1930, is 
amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(a) In General.--'' before ``It shall be 
        unlawful''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) Special Rule Relating to Cooperatives.--A cooperative 
association, as defined in section 15(a) of the Agricultural Marketing 
Act, shall not be deemed to have violated subsection (a)(5) by reason 
of the conduct of a member or affiliate of that cooperative 
association.''.

                                 <all>
```
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT KRISTOPHER LYNN LEONARD,

Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 2D22-3025 November 15, 2023 Appeal from the County Court for Sarasota County; Phyllis R. Galen, Judge. Andrea Flynn Mogensen of The Law Office of Andrea Flynn Mogensen, P.A., Sarasota, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Elba Caridad Martin, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. SILBERMAN, LaROSE, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Strafford

No. 81-301

#### Diane M. Estlow v. New Hampshire Sweepstakes Commission

August 6, 1982

*Fisher, Moran, Willoughby, Clancy & White,*of Dover *(Stephen A. White*on the brief, and *Edward T. Clancy*orally), for the plaintiff.

*Gregory H. Smith,*attorney general *(Loretta S. Platt,*attorney, on the brief and orally), for the State.

Batchelder, J.

Diane M. Estlow, a ticket agent for the New Hampshire Sweepstakes Commission since March 1977, purchased a sweepstakes ticket on September 26, 1977. The particular ticket in question contained a joker prize in the bingo instant sweepstakes *720that entitled her to a twenty-four-week subscription in the “50/50 Sweepstakes” instant lottery game. The plaintiff then selected a number to be entered every week for twenty-four weeks in the “50/50 Sweepstakes” and mailed it on the appropriate form to the commission on September 30, 1977. She received a confirmation card on October 26 designating an effective date of October 28, 1977. During the intervening period, from September 30 to October 28, the number selected by the plaintiff was determined to be the winner of a $5,000 prize by the October 14 weekly drawing. The plaintiff made a demand upon the commission for payment of the prize. The commission refused, and she instituted this suit on October 30, 1977. After a hearing before a Master *(Robert A. Carignan,*Esq.), a decision was returned for the defendant and approved by the Court *(Wyman,*J.). We affirm.

The brochure issued by the New Hampshire Sweepstakes Commission explaining the weekly 50/50 sweepstakes drawing stated that the number selected was “[n]ot valid until confirmed by the New Hampshire Sweepstakes Commission.” The sweepstakes commission also issued a subscription application form which allowed subscribers to select a number to be effective for a selected number of weeks in the weekly 50/50 sweepstakes drawing. That application contains the statements that: “[ajctual participation in the Sweepstakes will begin as of the effective date shown on the multi-week subscription ticket and will end as of the expiration date shown,” and that confirmation of the acceptance would be received in “approximately three weeks.” The confirmation card which was sent to Mrs. Estlow contained the following statement: “Your subscription is valid for all of-the Friday drawings starting with the effective date [10/28/77] and ending with the expiration date [4/07/83] shown.”

 The master found that when the plaintiff accepted the defendant’s offer, it contained a condition that her application had to be verified by the sweepstakes commission before she could participate in the drawings. He also found that there was never any agreement, expressed or implied, that the plaintiff would be paid for a number drawn before the effective date of the subscription. The terms of a contract are questions of fact to be determined by the trier of fact, and, when supported by the evidence, we will uphold its findings. *Saucier Co. v. McVetty,*107 N.H. 419, 421, 223 A.2d 520, 521 (1966). Because there was sufficient evidence, we affirm.

*Affirmed.*

All concurred.