alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 128 (Monday, July 3, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 41012]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16777]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA-1412, MM Docket No. 99-291; RM-9665]


Digital Television Broadcast Service; Reno, NV

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of Sarkes Tarzian, Inc., 
licensee of Station KTVN(TV), Reno, Nevada, substitutes DTV Channel 13 
for DTV Channel 32 at Reno, Nevada. See 64FR 52486, September 29, 1999. 
DTV Channel 13 can be allotted to Reno at coordinates (39-18-45 N. and 
119-53-00 W.) with a power of 12, HAAT of 906 meters and with a DTV 
service population of 481 thousand. With this action, this proceeding 
is terminated.

DATES: Effective August 14, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-1600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 99-291, adopted June 26, 2000, and 
released June 29, 2000. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, DC. The 
complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Services, 
Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Television, Digital television broadcasting.

    Part 73 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.


Sec. 73.622  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.622(b), the Table of Digital Television Allotments 
under Nevada, is amended by removing DTV Channel 32 and adding DTV 
Channel 13 at Reno.

Federal Communications Commission.
Barbara A. Kreisman,
Chief, Video Services Division, Mass Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 00-16777 Filed 6-30-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Order entered November 18, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 14 - 00856 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF C.S.B AND R.D.B , CHILDREN On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF - 11 - 15158



### O RDER We GRANT appellant’s November 15, 2015 unopposed motion for an extension of time to file a brief. Appellant shall file a brief by DECEMBER 30, 2015
. /s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-20-00067-CV

IN RE MARTY, INC.

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 5, 2020

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On January 30, 2020, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for stay of 

the underlying proceedings pending final resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus. 

Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy, available only when the relator can show (1) the trial court 

clearly abused its discretion or violated a duty imposed by law; and (2) there is no adequate remedy 

by way of appeal. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). 

After considering the petition and the record, this court concludes relator did not show it is entitled 

to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 52.8(a). Relator’s motion for temporary relief is denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2017CI03051, styled Myron L. Evans v. Marty Inc., pending in the 73rd 

Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr. presiding.
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report on Quarterly Report of Global Tech Capital Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.

The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  May 8, 2003



Michael Mitsiadis



Michael Mitsiadis

President and Chief Executive Officer
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PETITIONER, v. WALTER BALLARD, RESPONDENT.

See same case below: 15 *N. J. Super.*417, 83 *A. 2d*539.

For the petitioner: *Mr. Theodore D. Parsons*and *Mr. Hugene Urbanialc.*

December 17, 1951.

Granted.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Richard De Young, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Amended Annual Report of BSML Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that information contained in such Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of BSML, Inc.



|                   |  |                                             
|------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------
|Date: May 18, 2007
|                   | 
|By:                |  | /s/ Richard De Young                        
|                   |  | Richard De Young                            
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer                     
|                   |  | (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
No. 11-8040.

#### Hutchinson *v.*Pennsylvania.

Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-9542.

#### Valenzuela *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
§ 51-6.7 Orders in excess of nonprofit agency capability. ( a ) Nonprofit agencies are expected to furnish commodities on the Procurement List within the time frames specified by the Government. The nonprofit agency must have the necessary production facilities to meet normal fluctuations in demand.
( b ) Nonprofit agencies shall take those actions necessary to ensure that they can ship commodities within the time frames specified by the Government. In instances where the nonprofit agency determines that it cannot ship the commodity in the quantities specified by the required shipping date, it shall notify the central nonprofit agency and the contracting activity. The central nonprofit agency shall request a revision of the shipping schedule which the contracting activity should grant, if feasible, or the central nonprofit agency shall issue a purchase exception authorizing procurement from commercial sources as provided in § 51-5.4 of this chapter.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-06297, 333-43296, 333-56284, 333-59379, 333-62130, 333-105140, 333-106409 and 333-120932) of ArthroCare Corporation of our report dated March 24, 2006 relating to the financial
statements and financial statement schedule, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

|                              
|------------------------------
|                              
|/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
|Austin, Texas                 
|March 24, 2006
§ 80.159 Operator requirements of Title III of the Communications Act and the Safety Convention. ( a ) Each telegraphy passenger ship equipped with a radiotelegraph station in accordance with Part II of Title III of the Communications Act must carry two radio officers holding a First Class Radiotelegraph Operator's Certificate, Second Class Radiotelegraph Operator's Certificate, or Radiotelegraph Operator License.
( b ) Each cargo ship equipped with a radiotelegraph station in accordance with Part II of Title III of the Communications Act and which has a radiotelegraph auto alarm must carry a radio officer holding a First Class Radiotelegraph Operator's Certificate, Second Class Radiotelegraph Operator's Certificate, or Radiotelegraph Operator License who has had at least six months service as a radio officer on board U.S. ships. If the radiotelegraph station does not have an auto alarm, a second radio officer who holds a First Class Radiotelegraph Operator's Certificate, Second Class Radiotelegraph Operator's Certificate, or Radiotelegraph Operator License must be carried.
( c ) Each cargo ship equipped with a radiotelephone station in accordance with Part II of Title III of the Communications Act must carry a radio operator who meets the following requirements: ( 1 ) Where the station power does not exceed 1500 watts peak envelope power, the operator must hold a marine radio operator permit or higher class license.
( 2 ) Where the station power exceeds 1500 watts peak envelope power, the operator must hold a general radiotelephone radio operator license or higher class license.
( d ) Each passenger ship equipped with a GMDSS installation in accordance with subpart W of this part shall carry at least two persons holding an appropriate GMDSS Radio Operator License or, if the passenger ship operates exclusively within twenty nautical miles of shore, at least two persons holding either a GMDSS Radio Operator License or a Restricted GMDSS Radio Operator License, as specified in § 13.7 of this chapter.
( e ) Each ship transporting more than six passengers for hire equipped with a radiotelephone station in accordance with Part III of Title III of the Communications Act must carry a radio operator who meets the following requirements: ( 1 ) Where the station power does not exceed 250 watts carrier power or 1500 watts peak envelope power, the radio operator must hold a marine radio operator permit or higher class license.
( 2 ) Where the station power exceeds 250 watts carrier power or 1500 watts peak envelope power, the radio operator must hold a general radiotelephone operator license or higher class license.
[51 FR 31213, Sept. 2, 1986, as amended at 54 FR 40058, Sept. 29, 1989; 68 FR 46962, Aug. 7, 2003; 78 FR 23155, Apr. 18, 2013; 81 FR 90746, Dec. 15, 2016]
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1



                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by 
reference of our report dated February 19, 1999 included in or incorporated by 
reference into ChiRex Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended 
December 31, 1998, into ChiRex Inc.'s previously filed Registration Statement 
No. 333-02216 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-02218 on Form S-8, 
Registration Statement No. 333-02220 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 
333-68849 on Form S-3.


                                                ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
February 19, 1999
#### § 60-742.7 Review of this part.

This part shall be reviewed by the Chairman of the EEOC and the Director of OFCCP periodically, and as appropriate, to determine whether changes to the part are necessary or desirable, and whether the part should remain in effect.
No. 11-5176.

#### Frasher *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 54.2003 Eligible services and equipment. ( a ) *Supported services and equipment.* All supported services and equipment are identified in the Schools and Libraries Cybersecurity Pilot Program Eligible Services List (see § 54.502(a)), available on the FCC's website at *https://www.fcc.gov/cybersecurity-pilot/cybersecurity-pilot-eligible-services-list*. The services and equipment in this subpart will be supported in addition to all reasonable charges that are incurred by taking such services, such as state and Federal taxes. Charges for termination liability, penalty surcharges, and other charges not included in the cost of taking such service shall not be covered by universal service support.
( b ) *Prohibition on resale.* Eligible supported services and equipment shall not be sold, resold, or transferred in consideration of money or any other thing of value, until the conclusion of the Schools and Libraries Cybersecurity Pilot Program, as provided in § 54.2001.
No. 11-5693.

#### Mack *v.*Small, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

L.D.H.,

Petitioner

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA;

PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 13 WM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 17th day of April , 2019, the Application for Extraordinary Relief

Seeking Assumption of Jurisdiction is DENIED.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Peter van Stolk, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Jones Soda Co. 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing equivalent functions): 

 

a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

Dated as of May 14,2004.
- MT 1st page
- Memorial-200701-MT
----

**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                August 26, 2005 | /s/                Stephen Russell                                                                           |
|--------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 | Stephen                RussellChairman                of the Board andChief                Executive Officer |

Back      to Form 10-K
No. 11M113.

#### Shanks *v.*Donahoe, Postmaster General, et al.

Motion for leave to proceed as a veteran denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
     Saber Capital, Inc. December 31, 1998 financial statements and is
     qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000866491
<NAME>                        SABER CAPITAL, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (1,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        



</TABLE>
#### § 22.805 Channels for general aviation air-ground service.

The following channels are allocated for the provision of radiotelephone service to airborne mobile subscribers in general aviation aircraft. These channels have a bandwidth of 20 kHz and are designated by their center frequencies in MegaHertz.

| Ground | Airborne mobile |
| --- | --- |
| 454.675 | 459.675 |

Signalling Channel Pair

| Ground | Airborne mobile |
| --- | --- |
| 454.700 | 459.700 |
| 454.725 | 459.725 |
| 454.750 | 459.750 |
| 454.775 | 459.775 |
| 454.800 | 459.800 |
| 454.825 | 459.825 |
| 454.850 | 459.850 |
| 454.875 | 459.875 |
| 454.900 | 459.900 |
| 454.925 | 459.925 |
| 454.950 | 459.950 |
| 454.975 | 459.975 |

Communication Channel Pairs

(a) Channel 454.675 MHz is assigned to each and every ground station, to be used only for automatically alerting airborne mobile stations of incoming calls.

(b) All airborne mobile channels are assigned for use by each and every airborne mobile station.
#### § 69.412 Non participating company payments/receipts.

For telephone companies that are not association Common Line tariff participants, the payment or receipt of funds described in § 69.612(a) and (b) shall be apportioned, respectively, as an addition to or a deduction from their common line revenue requirement.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 166 (Monday, August 28, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 50922]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7188]



[[Page 50922]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology; American Health Information Community Consumer Empowerment 
Workgroup Meeting

ACTION: Announcement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the eighth meeting of the American 
Health Information Community Consumer Empowerment Workgroup in 
accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 
5 U.S.C., App.)

DATES: September 7, 2006, from 9 a.m. to 11 a.m.

ADDRESSES: Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20201), Conference Room 4090 (please bring photo ID for entry to a 
Federal building).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/bio_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be available via Web cast 
at http://www.envetcenterlive.com/cfmx/ec/login/login1.cfm?BID=67.

    Dated: August 21, 2006.
Judith Sparrow,
Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and 
Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology.
[FR Doc. 06-7188 Filed 8-25-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
No. 11-1224.

#### Dolehide *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Editorial Note on Part 74
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 74 appear at 64 FR 4055, Jan. 27, 1999.

§ 74.1262 Frequency monitors and measurements. ( a ) The licensee of a station authorized under this subpart is not required to provide means for measuring the operating frequency of the transmitter. However, only equipment having the required stability will be approved for use by an FM translator or booster.
( b ) In the event that a station authorized under this subpart is found to be operating beyond the frequency tolerance prescribed in § 74.1261, the licensee shall promptly suspend operation of the station and shall not resume operation until the station has been restored to its assigned frequency. Adjustment of the frequency determining circuits of an FM translator or booster shall be made by a qualified person in accordance with § 74.1250(g).