alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
31.1Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer of Genesis Capital Corporation of Nevadapursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002







I,
Richard Astrom, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this Form 10-Q of Genesis Capital Corporation of Nevada;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:





(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;





(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and





5. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small
business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting.





Date: May
15, 2008








/s/
RICHARD ASTROM





Richard
Astrom


Chief
Executive Officer
§ 65.104 Page limitations for rate of return submissions. Rate of return submissions, including all argument, attachments, appendices, supplements, and supporting materials, such as testimony, data and documents, but excluding tables of contents and summaries of argument, shall be subject to the following double spaced typewritten page limits: ( a ) The direct case submission of any participant shall not exceed 70 pages in length.
( b ) The responsive submission of any participant shall not exceed 70 pages in length.
( c ) The rebuttal submission of any participant shall not exceed 50 pages in length.
( d ) Petitions for exclusion from unitary treatment shall not exceed 70 pages in length. Oppositions to petitions for exclusion shall not exceed 50 pages in length. Rebuttals shall not exceed 35 pages in length.
[60 FR 28544, June 1, 1995]
§ 73.5008 Definitions applicable for designated entity provisions. ( a ) *Scope.* The definitions in this section apply to 47 CFR 73.5007, unless otherwise specified in that section.
( b ) A *medium of mass communications* means a daily newspaper; a cable television system; or a license or construction permit for a television broadcast station, an AM or FM broadcast station, or a direct broadcast satellite transponder.
( c ) ( 1 ) An attributable interest in a winning bidder or in a medium of mass communications shall be determined in accordance with § 73.3555 and Note 2 to § 73.3555. In addition, any interest held by an individual or entity with an equity and/or debt interest(s) in a winning bidder shall be attributed to that winning bidder for purposes of determining its eligibility for the new entrant bidding credit, if the equity (including all stockholdings, whether voting or nonvoting, common or preferred) and debt interest or interests, in the aggregate, exceed thirty-three (33) percent of the total asset value (defined as the aggregate of all equity plus all debt) of the winning bidder.
( 2 ) Notwithstanding paragraph (c)(1) of this section, where the winning bidder is an eligible entity, the combined equity and debt of the interest holder in the winning bidder may exceed the 33 percent threshold therein without triggering attribution, provided that: ( i ) The combined equity and debt of the interest holder in the winning bidder is less than 50 percent, or
( ii ) The total debt of the interest holder in the winning bidder does not exceed 80 percent of the asset value of the winning bidder and the interest holder does not hold any equity interest, option, or promise to acquire an equity interest in the winning bidder or any related entity. For purposes of paragraph (c)(2) of this section, an “eligible entity” shall include any entity that qualifies as a small business under the Small Business Administration's size standards for its industry grouping, as set forth in 13 CFR 121.201, at the time the transaction is approved by the FCC, and holds: ( A ) 30 percent or more of the stock or partnership interests and more than 50 percent of the voting power of the corporation or partnership that will own the media outlet; or
( B ) 15 percent or more of the stock or partnership interests and more than 50 percent of the voting power of the corporation or partnership that will own the media outlet, provided that no other person or entity owns or controls more than 25 percent of the outstanding stock or partnership interests; or
( C ) More than 50 percent of the voting power of the corporation that will own the media outlet if such corporation is a publicly traded company.
[63 FR 48629, Sept. 11, 1998, as amended at 64 FR 24527, May 7, 1999; 64 FR 44858, Aug. 18, 1999; 69 FR 72045, Dec. 10, 2004; 73 FR 28370, May 16, 2008; 75 FR 27200, May 14, 2010]
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the annual report of Entorian Technologies Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the
year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Wayne R. Lieberman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: September 26, 2008



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Wayne R. Lieberman 
|Wayne R. Lieberman     
|Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 73.319 FM multiplex subcarrier technical standards. ( a ) The technical specifications in this Section apply to all transmissions of FM multiplex subcarriers except those used for stereophonic sound broadcasts under the provisions of § 73.322.
( b ) *Modulation.* Any form of modulation may be used for subcarrier operation.
( c ) *Subcarrier baseband.* ( 1 ) During monophonic program transmissions, multiplex subcarriers and their significant sidebands must be within the range of 20 kHz to 99 kHz.
( 2 ) During stereophonic sound program transmissions (see § 73.322), multiplex subcarriers and their significant sidebands must be within the range of 53 kHz to 99 kHz.
( 3 ) During periods when broadcast programs are not being transmitted, multiplex subcarriers and their significant sidebands must be within the range of 20 kHz to 99 kHz.
( d ) *Subcarrier injection.* ( 1 ) During monophonic program transmissions, modulation of the carrier by the arithmetic sum of all subcarriers may not exceed 30% referenced to 75 kHz modulation deviation. However, the modulation of the carrier by the arithmetic sum of all subcarriers above 75 kHz may not modulate the carrier by more than 10%.
( 2 ) During stereophonic program transmissions, modulation of the carrier by the arithmetic sum of all subcarriers may not exceed 20% referenced to 75 kHz modulation deviation. However, the modulation of the carrier by the arithmetic sum of all subcarriers above 75 kHz may not modulate the carrier by more than 10%.
( 3 ) During periods when no broadcast program service is transmitted, modulation of the carrier by the arithmetic sum of all subcarriers may not exceed 30% referenced to 75 kHz modulation deviation. However, the modulation of the carrier by the arithmetic sum of all subcarriers above 75 kHz may not modulate the carrier by more than 10%.
( 4 ) Total modulation of the carrier wave during transmission of multiplex subcarriers used for subsidiary communications services must comply with the provisions § 73.1570(b).
( e ) Subcarrier generators may be installed and used with a type accepted FM broadcast transmitter without specific authorization from the FCC provided the generator can be connected to the transmitter without requiring any mechanical or electrical modifications in the transmitter FM exciter circuits.
( f ) Stations installing multiplex subcarrier transmitting equipment must ensure the proper suppression of spurious or harmonic radiations. See §§ 73.317, 73.1590 and 73.1690. If the subcarrier operation causes the station's transmissions not to comply with the technical provisions for FM broadcast stations or causes harmful interference to other communication services, the licensee or permittee must correct the problem promptly or cease operation. The licensee may be required to verify the corrective measures with supporting data. Such data must be retained at the station and be made available to the FCC upon request.
[48 FR 28455, June 22, 1983, as amended at 48 FR 37216, Aug. 17, 1983; 49 FR 15080, Apr. 17, 1984; 49 FR 38131, Sept. 27, 1984; 50 FR 1534, Jan. 11, 1985; 51 FR 17029, May 8, 1986; 57 FR 48333, Oct. 23, 1992]
Exhibit 99.1
------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 USC, SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  quarterly  report  of  V-Formation,   Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10- QSB for the quarter  ended  September 30, 2002, as filed
with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  we,  Richard
Stelnick,  the Company's Chief Executive Officer,  and Robert  Miragliotta,  the
Company's  Chief  Financial  Officer,  certify,  pursuant  to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  Section  1350),  that to the best of our
knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated: November 14, 2002                 s/Richard Stelnick
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Richard Stelnick, Chief Executive Officer


Dated: November 14, 2002                s/Robert Miragliotta
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Robert Miragliotta, Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                    JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                      DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                              2,594,163
<SECURITIES>                                      126,475,656
<RECEIVABLES>                                       9,524,535
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                        99,820,761
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            0<F1>
<PP&E>                                              8,073,153
<DEPRECIATION>                                      2,014,947
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    398,557,182
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       0<F1>
<BONDS>                                           429,620,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                53
<COMMON>                                              476,487
<OTHER-SE>                                      (177,301,548)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      398,557,182
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   34,032,024
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   99,925,312
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   12,614,269
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 70,689,198
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (136,582,486)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (18,076,574)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (118,505,912)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  (295,845,996)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (418,898,969)<F2>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (12.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (12.60)

<FN>
<F1>       The Company makes use of an unclassified balance sheet style due to
           the nature of its business. Current Assets and Current Liabilities
           are therefore reflected as zero in accordance with the instructions
           of Appendix E to the EDGAR Filer Manual.
<F2>       Net income represents net earnings applicable to common stock.
</FN>

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Future Trading

# Time and Date:

11 a.m., Friday, August 18, 2006.

# Place:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# Status:

Closed.

# Matters to be Considered:

Enforcement Matters.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Eileen A. Donovan, 

Acting Secretary of Commission.

[FR Doc. 06-6713  Filed 8-2-06; 10:33 am]

BILLING CODE 6151-01-M
Direct Dial: 435.634.3530 Direct Fax: 435.634.3505 e-mail: temerson@skywest.com

March4, 2014

VIAE-MailRichard.Goodwin@dot.gov The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. East Building Ground Floor, Rm El2-320 Washington, DC 20590 

### Re: Case No. 2011NM060038 Case No. 2011NM060047 Case No. 2011NM060063 Case No. 2011NM060072 Case No. 2011NM060073 Case No. 2011NM060081 CaseNo. 2011NM060095 Case No. 2012NM060014 Dear Judge Goodwin: DMS No. FAA-2012-0874 DMS No. FAA-2012-0872 DMS No. FAA-2012-0873 DMS No. FAA-2012-0869 DMS No. FAA-2012-0868 DMS No. FAA-2012-0904 DMS No. FAA-2013-0617 DMS No. FAA-2013-0619

# RECElVED MAR 1

# t 2014 

# HEARING DOCKET

OnJanuary 31, 2014, all parties executed a Joint Motionto Stay Proceedings onthe above-referenced cases. We advised you that global settlement negotiations were ongoing, and ifwe were unable to resolve these matters, we would proceedto trial. You informed me on February l21 h, at a hearing on another matter, that your calendar is free at the end ofMay 2014 and also the first two weeks ofJune 2014. Although Sky West wishes to continue settlement efforts, a key expert witness for SkyWest will beunavailable after July 1, 2014. As such, Sky West asks that three (3) days

444 South River Road !1 St. George, Utah 84790 1! Phone 435.634.3000 ;/ www.skywest.com

### The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin March 4, 2014 Page 2

be set aside onyour calendar 

### inthe May-June timefrarne for the hearing onthis matter.

TCE/jb

cc: Jeffrey Harper Michael L. 

### Dworkin

# ~rely,

# l~u 

# c LLYYI/ 

### Todd C. Emers Director:- Government and Legal Affairs

Patricia Matthews (Patricia.Matthews@dot.gov) 

### Hearing Docket Clerk
§ 73.816 Antennas. ( a ) Permittees and licensees may employ nondirectional antennas with horizontal only polarization, vertical only polarization, circular polarization or elliptical polarization.
( b ) Permittees and licensees may employ directional antennas in the LPFM service, in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.
( c ) [Reserved]
( d ) ( 1 ) Composite antennas and antenna arrays may be used where the total ERP does not exceed the maximum determined in accordance with § 73.811(a).
( 2 ) Either horizontal, vertical, circular, or elliptical polarization may be used provided that the supplemental vertically polarized ERP required for circular or elliptical polarization does not exceed the ERP otherwise authorized. Either clockwise or counterclockwise rotation may be used. Separate transmitting antennas are permitted if both horizontal and vertical polarization is to be provided.
( 3 ) An application that specifies the use of a directional antenna must provide the information identified in § 73.316(c) except that such information shall not be required of: ( i ) Public safety and transportation permittees and licensees eligible pursuant to § 73.853(a)(2) using directional antennas in connection with operation of Travelers' Information Service stations;
( ii ) LPFM permittees and licensees proposing a waiver of the second-adjacent channel spacing requirements of § 73.807 for the sole purpose of justifying such a waiver; and
( iii ) LPFM permittees and licensees using directional antennas solely for the purpose of meeting the international border zone distance requirements of § 73.807(g).
[65 FR 67303, Nov. 9, 2000, as amended at 78 FR 2106, Jan. 9, 2013; 85 FR 35573, June 11, 2020]
VII

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4660

To authorize issuance of a certificate of documentation with appropriate

endorsement for the vessel SMALLEY 6808 Amphibious Dredge.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 27, 1994

Mr. GOSS of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To authorize issuance of a certificate of documentation with

appropriate endorsement for the vessel SMALLEY 6808

Amphibious Dredge.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. Notwithstanding section 27 of the Mer4 chant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the Act

5 of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and sections

6 12106, 12107, and 12108 of title 46, United States Code,

7 as applicable on the date of this Act, the Secretary of

8 Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation
2

HR 4660 IH

1 with appropriate endorsement for the vessel SMALLEY

2 6808 Amphibious Dredge, Florida, FL1855FF.

Æ