alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.9


Current Director Fee Arrangements


             Directors of Great Southern Bancorp, Inc. ("Bancorp") receive a monthly fee of $750, which is the only compensation paid to
directors by Bancorp, except for stock options which may be granted in the discretion of the Board of Directors under Bancorp's 2003 Stock
Option and Incentive Plan. Directors of Great Southern Bank receive a monthly fee of $1,750.  The directors of Bancorp and the directors of
the Bank are the same individuals.  As the sole director of Great Southern Financial Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Bank,
William V. Turner, the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company and the Bank, receives a monthly fee of $600 for his service on
that board.  The directors of Bancorp and its subsidiaries are not paid any fees for committee service and are not reimbursed for their costs
incurred in attending Board and committee meetings.
#### § 32.6613 Product advertising.

This account shall include costs incurred in developing and implementing promotional strategies to stimulate the purchase of products and services. This excludes nonproduct-related advertising, such as corporate image, stock and bond issue and employment advertisements, which shall be included in the appropriate functional accounts.
§ 95.2779 MURS unwanted emissions limits. The requirements in this section apply to each MURS transmitter type both with and without the connection of attachments, such as an external microphone, power cord and/or antenna. ( a ) *Emission masks.* Emission masks applicable to transmitting equipment in the MURS are defined by the requirements in the following table. The numbers in the paragraphs column refer to attenuation requirement rule paragraph numbers under paragraph (b) of this section. The words “audio filter” refer to the audio filter described in § 95.2775. Channel center frequencies(MHz)
Paragraphs 151.820, 151.880 and 151.940
(1), (2). 154.570 & 154.600, with audio filter
(3), (4), (7). 154.570 & 154.600, without audio filter
(5), (6), (7).
( 1 ) Each MURS transmitter type that transmits F3E or G3E emissions on 154.570 MHz or 154.600 MHz and incorporates an audio filter satisfying the requirements of § 95.2775 in its design may comply with the less stringent unwanted emissions attenuation requirements set forth in paragraphs (b)(3), (4), and (7) of this section.
( 2 ) Each MURS transmitter type that transmits on 154.570 MHz or 154.600 MHz, but does not incorporate an audio filter satisfying the requirements of § 95.2775 in its design, must comply with the unwanted emissions attenuation requirements set forth in paragraphs (b)(5) through (7) of this section.
( b ) *Attenuation requirements.* The power of unwanted emissions must be attenuated below the transmitter output power in Watts (P) by at least: ( 1 ) 7.27(fd−2.88 kHz) dB on any frequency removed from the channel center frequency by a displacement frequency (fd in kHz) that is more than 5.625 kHz, but not more than 12.5 kHz.
( 2 ) 50 + 10 log (P) dB or 70 dB, whichever is the lesser attenuation, on any frequency removed from the channel center frequency by more than 12.5 kHz.
( 3 ) 25 dB on any frequency removed from the channel center frequency by more than 10 kHz, but not more than 20 kHz.
( 4 ) 35 dB on any frequency removed from the channel center frequency by more than 20 kHz, but not more than 50 kHz.
( 5 ) 83 log (fd ÷ 5) dB on any frequency removed from the center of the authorized bandwidth by a displacement frequency (fd in kHz) that is more than 5 kHz, but not more than 10 kHz.
( 6 ) 29 log (fd 2 ÷ 11) dB or 50 dB, whichever is the lesser attenuation on any frequency removed from the channel center frequency by a displacement frequency (fd in kHz) that is more than 10 kHz, but not more than 50 kHz.
( 7 ) 43 + 10 log(P) dB on any frequency removed from the channel center frequency by more than 50 kHz.
( c ) *Measurement bandwidths.* The power of unwanted emissions in the frequency bands specified in paragraphs (b)(1) and (3) through (6) of this section is measured with a reference bandwidth of 300 Hz. The power of unwanted emissions in the frequency ranges specified in paragraphs (b)(2) and (7) of this section is measured with a reference bandwidth of at least 30 kHz.
No. 11-8803.

#### Byrd *v.*Heath, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional Facility.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### CHARLES A. WATSON v. MARTIN GOODNO.

January Term, 1894.

*Lien for purchase money. Not in writing. Certified execution.*

1. As between the vendor and vendee an agreement that personal property shall remain the property of the vendor until the purchase price is paid is binding, though not in writing, and the vendor may maintain trover for an unauthorized disposal of the same.

2. In such case, upon the finding of the referee that the vendee disposed of the property without the consent of the vendor, the court may adjudge that the cause of action arose from the wilful and malicious act of the defendant and grant a certified execution.

Trover for the conversion of a horse. Heard upon the report of a referee at the September term, Washington county, 1892, Rowell, J., presiding. The court gave judgment for the plaintiff and further adjudged, upon the facts reported by the referee, that the cause of action arose from the wilful and malicious act of the defendant, and that a certified execution should issue. To the action of the court in both these particulars the defendant excepted.

*230The referee reported that the plaintiff had sold the defendant the horse upon the agreement that he was to have a lien for the purchase price, and that a written agreement was drawn up but never signed-; and that subsequently the defendant disposed of the horse without the consent of the plaintiff. Nothing was reported as to the manner or circumstances under which the horse was disposed of by the defendant.

*B. E. Bullard*for the defendant.

The report showed no act from which wrongful intent or malice upon the defendant’s part could be inferred, hence the court erred in granting a certificate upon the facts found. *Stowe*v. Powell, 46 Vt. 471; *Styles*v. Shanks, 46 Vt. 612 ; *Whiting*v. Dow, 42 Vt. 262 ; *Soule*v. Austin, 35 Vt. 515 ; *Eobinson*v. *Wilson,*22 Vt. 35.

*J. P. Lamson*for the plaintiff.

The granting of a certificate is discretionary with the trial court. *Hill*v. *Cox,*54 Vt. 627 ; *Melindy*v. *Sfaulding,*54 Vt. 517 ; *Boutwell*v. *Harriman,*58 Vt. 516.

THOMPSON, J.

I. The referee found that plaintiff bought the horse of Smith for the defendant, paying towards it one hundred and thirty-eight dollars, and that it was agreed between the plaintiff and defendant at the time of the purchase that the horse should remain the plaintiff’s until he was paid the one hundred and thirty-eight dollars. While there was a talk subsequently between the parties about releasing this lien upon the horse and taking other security, such an arrangement was never consummated. Although the lien was not evidenced by writing, yet as between the plaintiff and defendant it was valid, and the latter, having disposed of the horse and converted it to his own use, with-*231put .the consent of the plaintiff, is liable .in trover for such conversion. . .....

II. ’ On the facts found by the referee it was not error to grant a certified execution. *Melendy*v. Spaulding, 54 Vt. 517; *Hill*v. *Cox,*54 Vt. 627; *Boutwell*v. Harriman, 58 u Vt. 516.

*Judgment affirmed.*
EX-32                                               SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

                          SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Avery Sports Turf,
Inc. ("Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Report"),
the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.


Dated: November 12, 2003               /s/  Gary Borglund
                                       Gary Borglund, President
On motion to affirm, decided December 21, 1909.

#### SMITH v. SMITH.

[105 Pac. 706.]

Appeal and Error—Abandonment of Appeal—Failure to File Brief.

Where appellant failed to file a brief on time, and 40 days thereafter appellee moves for affirmance, and appellant makes no showing to excuse his failure, the decree will be affirmed.

From Multnomah: William N. Gatens, Judge.

This is a suit by William C. Smith and others against Benjamin F. Smith and others involving the title to two lots in Block 21, Highland, Multnomah County, Oregon. From a decree in favor of plaintiffs, defendants appeal.

Affirmed.

See, also, 51 Or. 31 (93 Pac. 449).

*Mr. James T. Lawler*and *Mr. Edward T. Taggart*for the motion.

*Mr. Hayward H. Riddell*and *Mr. Jay H. Upton, contra.*

*129Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Moore.

This is a motion to affirm a decree. The defendants perfected an appeal in this cause and should have filed a brief in this court not later than October 1, 1909. The plaintiffs’ counsel 40 days thereafter interposed this motion, a' copy of which was served on defendants’ counsel, who have made no showing to excuse their failure to comply with the rules of the court herein, thereby evidencing an intention to abandon the appeal.

The decree should therefore be affirmed; and it is so ordered. Affirmed.
No. 11-240.

#### West *v.*Reed, Secretary of State of Washington, et al.

Sup. Ct. Wash. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.1


                        INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


        We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
No. 33-43040 of Grant Geophysical, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated April
4, 1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Grant Geophysical, Inc.
and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995 and the related consolidated
statements of operations, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for
each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 1996, the year
then ended, and the related financial statement schedule, which report appears
in the December 31, 1996 annual report on Form 10-K of Grant Geophysical, Inc.


                                        KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Houston, Texas
April 15, 1997
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

# AGENCY:

Office of Insular Affairs, U.S. Department of the Interior.

# SUMMARY:

The U.S. Department of the Interior's Office of Insular Affairs will make available for comment its draft report produced pursuant to sec. 251 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (Pub. L. 109-58), concerning power utilities and energy usage in the U.S.-affiliated insular areas. These areas include the territories of Guam, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and American Samoa, as well as the freely associated states of the Republic of Palau, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, and the Federated States of Micronesia. The report was produced in consultation with the consultation with the U.S. Department of Energy. The draft report will be available on the Web site of the Department of the Interior's Office of Insular Affairs; the comments will be used to produce the final draft of the report by the end of FY 2006.

# DATES:

Please submit all comments in writing on or before September 27, 2006. There will be no second opportunity to submit comments.

# ADDRESSES:

                        The draft report is available on the Office of Insular Affairs Web site,                         *http://www.doi.gov/​oia/​.*                         Submit electronic comments to                         *joseph_gecan@ios.doi.gov;*                         see Supplemental Information or instructions on formatting. Address written comments to the attention of the Energy Policy Act Team, U.S. Department of the Interior, Office of Insular Affairs, 1849 C St. NW., Mailstop 4311-A, Washington, DC 20240.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Joseph Gean, (202) 208-4736.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Any electronic comments should be submitted in Word, WordPerfect, or PDF document formats only.

Dated: August 21, 2006.

R. Thomas Weimer,

Assistant Secretary—Policy, Management, and Budget.

[FR Doc. 06-7193 Filed 8-25-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-93-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1267

ALLAN L. GANT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE; SAM SAMPLES,

F.P., Chief Probation Officer; DAVIS N. LEWIS,

Deputy Chief Probation Officer; KENNETH SALES,

JR., U.S.P.O.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, District

Judge. (CA-97-335-5)

Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 21, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Allan L. Gant, Appellant Pro Se. Rebecca A. Betts, United States

Attorney, Stephen Michael Horn, Assistant United States Attorney,

Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order dismissing his

civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gant v. United States

Probation Office, No. CA-97-335-5 (S.D.W. Va. Feb. 13, 1998). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 21.1
  SUBSIDIARIES
    OF ION GEOPHYSICAL CORPORATION
  Subsidiary

JurisdictionBeijing ION Geophysical Co., Ltd.

ChinaConcept Systems Holdings Limited

ScotlandConcept Systems Limited

ScotlandGMG/AXIS, Inc.

DelawareGX Technology Canada, Ltd.

CanadaGX Technology Corporation

TexasGX Technology EAME. Limited.

UKGX Technology Processamento de Dados Ltda.

BrazilGX Technology Sismica Brasil Ltda.

BrazilGX Technology Trinidad, Ltd.

West IndiesI/O Cayman Islands, Ltd.

Cayman IslandsI/O International, Ltd.

Cayman IslandsI/O International Holdings, Ltd.

Cayman IslandsI/O Luxembourg S.à r.l.

LuxembourgI/O Marine Systems Limited

UKI/O Marine Systems, Inc.

LouisianaI/O U.K., LTD.

UKI/O U.K. Holdings Limited

ScotlandInco Industrial Components s-Gravenhage
    B.V.

NetherlandsInput/Output Canada, Ltd.

CanadaION China Holdings, Limited

Hong KongION Exploration Products (U.S.A.), Inc.

DelawareION Geophysical CIS LLC

RussiaION International Holdings L.P.

BermudaION International S.à r.l.

LuxembourgION International Sales Limited

CyprusIPOP Management, Inc.

DelawareSensor Nederland B.V.

Netherlands
No. 10-1064.

#### Farina *v.*Nokia, Inc., et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

The Chief Justice and Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed November 30, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

Nos. 3D21-2235 & 3D21-2236

Lower Tribunal Nos. 19-1719, 19-2235

________________

Maria Victoria Castro,

Appellant,

vs.

Luz Marina Castro,

Appellee.

Appeals from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jorge E. Cueto, 

Judge.

Ellis Law Group, P.L., and Jordan R. Hammer (Boca Raton), for 

appellant.

Golden Glasko & Associates, P.A., and William H. Glasko, for 

appellee.

Before EMAS, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed. Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372, 380 (2007) (“When opposing 

parties tell two different stories, one of which is blatantly contradicted by the 

record, so that no reasonable jury could believe it, a court should not adopt 

that version of the facts for purposes of ruling on a motion for summary 

judgment.”) see also Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 247–48 

(1986) (“[T]he mere existence of some alleged factual dispute between the 

parties will not defeat an otherwise properly supported motion for summary 

judgment; the requirement is that there be no genuine issue of material

fact.”).
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.2203 Competitive bidding mechanisms. ( a ) *Public notice of competitive bidding procedures.* Detailed competitive bidding procedures shall be established by public notice prior to the commencement of the reverse auction, including without limitation: ( 1 ) *Sequencing.* The sequencing with which the reverse auction and the related forward auction assigning new spectrum licenses will occur.
( 2 ) *Reserve price.* Reserve prices, either disclosed or undisclosed, so that higher bids for various reverse auction bid options would not win in the reverse auction. Reserve prices may apply individually, in combination, or in the aggregate.
( 3 ) *Opening bids and bid increments.* Maximum or minimum opening bids, and by announcement before or during the reverse auction, maximum or minimum bid increments in dollar or percentage terms.
( 4 ) *Activity rules.* Activity rules that require a minimum amount of bidding activity.
( b ) *Binding obligation.* A bid is an unconditional, irrevocable offer by the bidder to fulfill the terms of the bid. The Commission accepts the offer by identifying the bid as winning. A bidder has a binding obligation to fulfill the terms of a winning bid. A winning bidder will relinquish spectrum usage rights pursuant to the terms of any winning bid by the deadline set forth in § 73.3700(b)(4) of this chapter.
( c ) *Stopping procedures.* Before or during the reverse auction, procedures may be established regarding when bidding will stop for a round, a stage, or an entire auction, in order to terminate the auction within a reasonable time and in accordance with public interest considerations and the goals, statutory requirements, rules, and procedures for the auction, including any reserve price or prices.
( d ) *Auction delay, suspension, or cancellation.* By public notice or by announcement during the reverse auction, the auction may be delayed, suspended, or cancelled in the event of a natural disaster, technical obstacle, network disruption, evidence of an auction security breach or unlawful bidding activity, administrative or weather necessity, or for any other reason that affects the fair and efficient conduct of the competitive bidding. The Commission has the authority, at its sole discretion, to resume the competitive bidding starting from the beginning of the current or some previous round or cancel the competitive bidding in its entirety.
#### § 27.802 Permissible communications.

Licensees in the paired 1392-1395 MHz and 1432-1435 MHz bands and unpaired 1390-1392 MHz band are authorized to provide fixed or mobile service, except aeronautical mobile service, subject to the technical requirements of this subpart.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                   SUBSIDIARIES OF CITYSCAPE FINANCIAL CORP.
                               DECEMBER 31, 1997

The following is a list of the Company's subsidiaries which are all owned 100%
by Cityscape Financial Corp. who is the ultimate or immediate parent:

Name of Subsidiary                                           Incorporated in
------------------                                           ---------------
A. Cityscape Corp.                                           New York
   1. Cityscape Funding Corporation                          Delaware
   2. Cityscape Funding Corporation II                       Delaware
   3. Cityscape Funding Corporation III                      Delaware
   4. Cityscape Funding Corporation IV                       Delaware
   5. Cityscape Funding Corporation V                        Delaware
   6. City Mortgage Corporation Limited                      United Kingdom
      a. City Mortgage Servicing Limited                     United Kingdom
      b. City Mortgage Financial Services Limited            United Kingdom
      c. J&J Securities Limited                              United Kingdom
      d. City Mortgage Collateral Reserve No. 1 Limited      United Kingdom
      e. Greyfriars Group Limited                            United Kingdom
         I. Greyfriars Financial Services Limited            United Kingdom
            i.    Assured Funding Corporation Limited        United Kingdom
            ii.   Cityscape (UK) Limited                     United Kingdom
            iii.  Midland & General Direct Limited           United Kingdom
            iv.   Home and Family Finance Limited            United Kingdom
            v.    Home Mortgage Corporation Limited          United Kingdom
            vi.   Homestead Finance Limited                  United Kingdom
            vii.  Homeowners Capital Plan Limited            United Kingdom
            viii. Mortgage Management Limited                United Kingdom
            ix.   Secured Funding Limited                    United Kingdom
No. 10-10820.

#### Garner *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.