alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4906

AN ACT

To amend the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 to limit consideration of nonemergency

matters in emergency legislation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Emergency Spending

5 Control Act of 1994’’.
2

HR 4906 EH

1 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF EMERGENCY SPENDING.

2 (a) EMERGENCY APPROPRIATIONS.—Section

3 251(b)(2)(D)(i) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency

4 Deficit Control Act of 1985 is amended by adding at the

5 end the following new sentence: ‘‘However, OMB shall not

6 adjust any discretionary spending limit under this clause

7 for any statute that designates appropriations as emer8 gency requirements if that statute contains an appropria9 tion for any other matter, event, or occurrence, but that

10 statute may contain rescissions of budget authority.’’.

11 (b) EMERGENCY LEGISLATION.—Section 252(e) of

12 the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act

13 of 1985 is amended by adding at the end the following

14 new sentence: ‘‘However, OMB shall not designate any

15 such amounts of new budget authority, outlays, or receipts

16 as emergency requirements in the report required under

17 subsection (d) if that statute contains any other provisions

18 that are not so designated, but that statute may contain

19 provisions that reduce direct spending.’’.

20 (c) NEW POINT OF ORDER.—Title IV of the Congres21 sional Budget Act of 1974 is amended by adding at the

22 end the following new section:

23 ‘‘POINT OF ORDER REGARDING EMERGENCIES

24 ‘‘SEC. 408. It shall not be in order in the House of

25 Representatives or the Senate to consider any bill or joint

26 resolution, or amendment thereto or conference report
3

HR 4906 EH

1 thereon, containing an emergency designation for purposes

2 of section 251(b)(2)(D) or 252(e) of the Balanced Budget

3 and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 if it also pro4 vides an appropriation or direct spending for any other

5 item or contains any other matter, but that bill or joint

6 resolution, amendment, or conference report may contain

7 rescissions of budget authority or reductions of direct

8 spending, or that amendment may reduce amounts for

9 that emergency.’’.

10 (d) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of con11 tents set forth in section 1(b) of the Congressional Budget

12 and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 is amended by in13 serting after the item relating to section 313 the following

14 new item:

‘‘Sec. 408. Point of order regarding emergencies.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives August 17,

1994.

Attest:

Clerk.
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4906

AN ACT

To amend the Congressional Budget and Imislation. ation of nonemergency matters in emergency leg- poundment Control Act of 1974 to limit consider-
No. 10-11290.

#### Mendez *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            College of Information and Cyberspace
                    National Defense University
                CIC
        Search
                    Search CIC:
                        Search
                Search CIC:
                    Search
    Home

    About 
        Mission & Vision

    Faculty & Staff

    Fact Sheet

    Alumni

    Internships

    FAQ

    Admissions 
        Eligibility Requirements

    Admissions Calendar

    Application Instructions

    Apply Online

    International Students

    Academics 
        Graduate Catalog

    M.S. in Strategic Information and Cyberspace Studies
        
        JPME Master's Degree

    Cyber Workforce Master's Degree (Part Time)

    Leadership Development Programs

    Graduate Certificates

    Academic Partners

    Current Students 
        JPME II  Incoming Students

    LDP Incoming Students

    Student Registration

    Bring Your Own Device

    IA Compliance

    Completion Procedures / Order Transcripts

    Student Services and Resources

    Events
    
        Cyber Beacon

    Cyber PME Colloquium

    Hopper Award

    Lecture Series

    CYBERCOM Symposium

    NEWS

    UC2
    
        About

    Events

    Work With Us

    Center for Cybersecurity
    
        About

    Cybersecurity Center POC

    Cybersecurity Supporting Faculty

    CAE-CDE CISO Certificate Program

    Cybersecurity Trending News

    Cyber Labs
        
        Ethical Hacking

    Critical Infrastructure - SCADA

    Cyber Exercises
        
        Tabletop Exercise

    Cyber Competitions

    Cyber Resources and Awareness

    Stakeholder / Industry Advisory Council

    Contact 
        Contact Us

    Directions

    Access to Ft. McNair

    Map of Ft. McNair  News
 DoD UC2 Workshop UC2
 On April 28, 2022, the DoD University Consortium for Cybersecurity Coordination Center (UC4) at the National Defense University College of Information and Cyberspace (NDU CIC) hosted the first UC2 Workshop. The physical location of the event was the Lincoln Hall Auditorium (Room #1230) on the first floor of Lincoln Hall at Fort McNair. Attendees included high-level Department of Defense officials and staff members, the NDU CIC Chancellor, the NDU CIC UC4 team, and presenters from seven universities with a National Security Agency (NSA) Center of Academic Excellence (CAE) designation.
 SHARE
 PRINT
 Previous Story
 Next Story
 National Defense University


College of Information and Cyberspace

300 Fifth Ave., Bldg. 62
Fort Lesley J. McNair
Washington, DC 20319-5066

202-685-6300
                    Stay Connected
                DOD Privacy & Security
 DOD Links Disclaimer
 DOD Social Media Policy
 DOD Web Policy
 FOIA
 NDU System of Records Notice
 NDU Privacy & Security Notice
 No FEAR Act
 Open GOV
 Plain Writing Act
 Section 508
 Small Business Act
 USA.gov
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### § 80.381 Frequencies for operational fixed stations.

The following carrier frequencies in the 72-76 MHz band are assignable to operational fixed stations using vertical polarization, if no harmful interference is caused to TV reception on Channels 4 and 5. These frequencies are shared with the Land Mobile and Aviation Radio Services.

| 72.02 | 72.28 | 72.64 | 72.90 | 75.68 | 75.94 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 72.04 | 72.30 | 72.66 | 72.92 | 75.70 | 75.96 |
| 72.06 | 72.32 | 72.68 | 72.94 | 75.72 | 75.98 |
| 72.08 | 72.34 | 72.70 | 72.96 | 75.74 | |
| 72.10 | 72.36 | 72.72 | 72.98 | 75.76 | |
| 72.12 | 72.38 | 72.74 | 75.42 | 75.78 | |
| 72.14 | 72.40 | 72.76 | 75.46 | 75.80 | |
| 72.16 | 72.42 | 72.78 | 75.50 | 75.82 | |
| 72.18 | 72.46 | 72.80 | 75.54 | 75.84 | |
| 72.20 | 72.50 | 72.82 | 75.58 | 75.86 | |
| 72.22 | 72.54 | 72.84 | 75.62 | 75.88 | |
| 72.24 | 72.58 | 72.86 | 75.64 | 75.90 | |
| 72.26 | 72.62 | 72.88 | 75.66 | 75.92 | |

Operational Fixed Frequencies in the 72-76 MHz Band

Carrier frequency in MHz

[51 FR 31213, Sept. 2, 1986, as amended at 54 FR 40059, Sept. 29, 1989]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED 
FROM THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC. FOR 
THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1998 TO DECEMBER 31, 1998, AND IS 
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL 
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                YEAR
<PERIOD-START>                        JAN-1-1998
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                3,181,025
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                      0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                      0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>           24,288,316
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                2,385,162
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                  2,416,622
<LOANS>                               73,227,455
<ALLOWANCE>                           1,106,830
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        105,133,201
<DEPOSITS>                            91,306,536
<SHORT-TERM>                          700,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                   1,156,731
<LONG-TERM>                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<COMMON>                              4,340,952
<OTHER-SE>                            7,628,982
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>        105,133,201
<INTEREST-LOAN>                       7,121,587
<INTEREST-INVEST>                     1,370,889
<INTEREST-OTHER>                      75,344
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                      8,567,820
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                    4,229,037
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    4,247,187
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                 4,320,633
<LOAN-LOSSES>                         258,257
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                    1,360
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                       2,930,160
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       1,662,128
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>            1,662,128
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                          976,413
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         0.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                         0.61
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                        4.59
<LOANS-NON>                           0
<LOANS-PAST>                          0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                      0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                       416,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                      1,033,393
<CHARGE-OFFS>                         199,717
<RECOVERIES>                          14,897
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                     1,106,830
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                  1,083,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                   0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>               23,830
        

</TABLE>
§ 22.365 Antenna structures; air navigation safety. Licensees that own their antenna structures must not allow these antenna structures to become a hazard to air navigation. In general, antenna structure owners are responsible for registering antenna structures with the FCC if required by part 17 of this chapter, and for installing and maintaining any required marking and lighting. However, in the event of default of this responsibility by an antenna structure owner, each FCC permittee or licensee authorized to use an affected antenna structure will be held responsible by the FCC for ensuring that the antenna structure continues to meet the requirements of part 17 of this chapter. See § 17.6 of this chapter. ( a ) *Marking and lighting.* Antenna structures must be marked, lighted and maintained in accordance with part 17 of this chapter and all applicable rules and requirements of the Federal Aviation Administration.
( b ) *Maintenance contracts.* Antenna structure owners (or licensees and permittees, in the event of default by an antenna structure owner) may enter into contracts with other entities to monitor and carry out necessary maintenance of antenna structures. Antenna structure owners (or licensees and permittees, in the event of default by an antenna structure owner) that make such contractual arrangements continue to be responsible for the maintenance of antenna structures in regard to air navigation safety.
[61 FR 4365, Feb. 6, 1996]
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with this amended annual report on Form 10-K/A of Mercury Interactive Corporation (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

I, David J.
Murphy, Chief Financial Officer of Mercury Interactive Corporation, certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

(2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Mercury Interactive Corporation.



|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: July 3, 2006                                               
|                                                                 
|/S/    DAVID J. MURPHY                                           
|David J. Murphy Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CFO AS REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14 or 15d-14 OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHAGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Zap.Com Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
    5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
   Date: November 7, 2006/s/ Leonard DiSalvoLeonard DiSalvoVice President  Finance and CFO
 17
exv10w37



 





EXHIBIT 10.37



Addendum 1 To OEM Purchase and Supply Agreement between GE Medical Systems Information
Technologies and Cardiac Science



The purpose of this addendum is to extend the set of private-label OEM devices manufactured by
Cardiac Science (CSI) for GE Medical Systems Information Technologies (GEMS IT) to include one
additional automated external defibrillator and its accessories. The product shall be labeled the
“GE Responder AED Pro” and shall correspond in all other aspects with Cardiac Science’s version,
the “Powerheart AED G3 Pro.” This document will also confirm transfer pricing to GEMS IT.



CSI authorizes GEMS IT to market this GE-branded AED on an exclusive basis anywhere in the world,
except Japan. GEMS IT’s rights apply only to the GE-branded product. The technology on which this
device is based will not be exclusive to GEMS IT and nothing in this agreement shall prohibit
Cardiac Science from selling its products in any market or to any third parties.



The transfer prices shall be as follows:




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	•	 	Responder AED Pro package, including accessories & disposable battery
	 	$	[ * ]	 
	•	 	3-lead ECG patient cable for monitoring (optional)
	 	$	[ * ]	 
	•	 	Rechargeable battery (optional)
	 	$	[ * ]	 
	•	 	Battery charger
	 	$	[ * ]	 





GE will incur no additional expenses for engineering, industrial design, or any other work
associated with the customization of this product, its accessories, or its software. In
particular, CSI will provide at no charge to GE translated RescueLink event-review software and
operator’s manuals. As is the case with Responder AED, MDLink will be renamed ServiceLink and
included on a separate, English-only Service CD-ROM.



CSI will manufacture this product for GEMS IT in accordance with (and this addendum shall form a
part of and be otherwise subject to) the OEM Purchase and Supply Agreement signed between the
parties on the 29th day of July 2003 (the “Agreement”). The definition of OEM Products
under the Agreement shall be deemed to include the items covered by this addendum. In the event of
conflict, this addendum shall control.




***



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this addendum to be signed by their thereunto duly
authorized representatives as of March 24, 2004.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Cardiac Science, Inc.	 	 	 	GE Medical Systems Information Technologies
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ RAYMOND W. COHEN
	 	 	 	By:
	 	/s/ MICHAEL GENAU
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Name:

	 	Raymond W. Cohen
	 	 	 	Name:
	 	Michael Genau
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Title:

	 	Chairman & CEO
	 	 	 	Title:
	 	Vice President &
General Mgr.,
Diagnostic
Cardiology








 




			
	[ * ] 	 	designates portions of this document that have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed separately with the commission.
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code), each of the undersigned officers of Teléfonos de México, S.A.B. de C.V., a sociedad anónima bursátil de capital variableorganized under the laws of Mexico (the Company), does hereby certify, to
such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the Form
20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |                            |  |                        
|------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: May 29, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/    Héctor Slim Seade  
|                    |  |  |  | Name:                      |  | Héctor Slim Seade      
|                    |  |  |  | Title:                     |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                    |  | 
|Dated: May 29, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/    Adolfo Cerezo Pérez
|                    |  |  |  | Name:                      |  | Adolfo Cerezo Pérez    
|                    |  |  |  | Title:                     |  | Chief Financial Officer
[No. 3155.]

#### Henry Weiss *v.*The State.

Platino Cards in a Public Place—Indictment.—Article 358 of the Penal Code enumerates the public houses in which it is made penal to play at a game of cards. Article 356 prescribes the circumstances under which *a room*in a house may come within the prohibition of the laws, to-wit: “Any room attached to such public house and commonly used for gaming. A private room of an inn or tavern is not within the meaning of public places, unless such room is commonly used for gaming,” etc. It follows that when a room of a house is designated as the place of playing, the indictment, to charge the offense of playing cards in a public place, must allege that the room is attached to some one of the public houses named in the statute.

*432Appeal from the County Court of Robertson. Tried below be- ! fore the Hon. J. E. Crawford, County Judge.

The opinion discloses the case. The penalty imposed was a fine of ten dollars.

No brief for the appellant has reached the Reporters;

*J. H.*Burts, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.’

White, Presiding Judge.

In this case the indictment charges that appellant did “ unlawfully and willfully play at a certain game with cards at and in a certain gaming room used for gaming,” etc. Is this allegation sufficient ?

After enumerating, in Article 355, the public houses in which it is made penal to play at any game with cards, our statute, Article 356, Penal Code, prescribes the circumstances in which *a room*in a house may come within the prohibition of the law, to wit: “Any room attached to such public house and commonly used for gaming. * ** **A private room of an inn or tavern is not within the meaning of public places, unless such room is commonly used for gaming,” etc. To play in an out houso where people resort is also an offense. (Art. 355.)

Where a room of a house is designated as the place, we are of opinion that the allegations must further declare that such room is attached to some one of the public houses named in the statute. *(O'Brien*v. *The State,*10 Texas Ct. App., 544.) If the charge had been that the playing was in “a gaming house,” instead of “room,” that would have been sufficient under Article 356. “House” and “room” are not used as synonymous or convertible terms.

Because the court erred in overruling the motion to quash the indictment, the judgment is reversed, and because the indictment is insufficient to charge an offense, the prosecution is dismissed.

*Reversed and dismissed.*

Opinion delivered June 11, 1884,
```

[House Report 108-399]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

108th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                    108-399

======================================================================

 
 WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(A) OF RULE XIII WITH RESPECT TO THE 
  SAME DAY CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED BY THE RULES 
                               COMMITTEE

                                _______
                                

 November 21, 2003.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

    Mr. Linder, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 465]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 465, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a 
two-thirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is 
reported from the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions 
reported from the Rules Committee. The rule applies the waiver 
to any special rule reported on or before the legislative day 
of January 31, 2004, providing for consideration or disposition 
of any of the following measures: (1) a bill or joint 
resolution making continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 
2004, any amendment thereto, or any conference report thereon; 
or (2) a bill or joint resolution making general appropriations 
for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2004, any amendment 
thereto, or any conference report thereon.

                                

```