alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 76.310 Truth in billing and advertising. ( a ) Cable operators and direct broadcast satellite (DBS) providers shall state an aggregate price for the video programming that they provide as a clear, easy-to-understand, and accurate single line item on subscribers' bills, including on bills for legacy or grandfathered video programming service plans. If a price is introductory or limited in time, cable and DBS providers shall state on subscribers' bills the date the price ends, by disclosing either the length of time that a discounted price will be charged or the date on which a time period will end that will result in a price change for video programming, and the post-promotion rate 60 and 30 days before the end of any introductory period. Cable operators and DBS providers may complement the aggregate line item with an itemized explanation of the elements that compose that single line item.
( b ) Cable operators and DBS providers that communicate a price for video programming in promotional materials shall state the aggregate price for the video programming in a clear, easy-to-understand, and accurate manner. If part of the aggregate price for video programming fluctuates based upon service location, then the provider must state where and how consumers may obtain their subscriber-specific “all-in” price (for example, electronically or by contacting a customer service or sales representative). If part or all of the aggregate price is limited in time, then the provider must state the post-promotion rate, as calculated at that time, and the duration of each rate that will be charged. Cable operators and DBS providers may complement the aggregate price with an itemized explanation of the elements that compose that aggregate price. The requirement in this paragraph (b) shall not apply to the marketing of legacy or grandfathered video programming service plans that are no longer generally available to new customers. For purposes of this section, the term “promotional material” includes communications offering video programming to consumers such as advertising and marketing.
( c ) This section may contain information collection and/or recordkeeping requirements. Compliance with this section will not be required until this paragraph (c) is removed or contains compliance dates. The Commission will publish a document in the Federal Register announcing the compliance dates and revising or removing this paragraph (c) accordingly.
[89 FR 28679, Apr. 19, 2024]
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interactive Intelligence, Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,  Donald E. Brown, M.D., Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1, fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.








/s/ Donald E. Brown, M.D.


Donald E. Brown, M.D.


President and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)


May 10, 2010
[Crim. No. 423.

Third Appellate District.

April 9, 1918.]

#### THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. J. H. CLARK, Appellant.

Criminal Law—Appeal—Failure to Appear or File Bribes—Submission oe Cause on Record.—Where on an appeal from a judgment in a criminal action no briefs are filed or appearance made on behalf of appellant, the attorney-general may move t'o submit the case for decision on the record.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. Malcolm C. Glenn, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Martin I. Welsh, and Ralph H. Lewis, for Appellant.

U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, and J. Charles Jones, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.

THE COURT.

Defendant appealed to this court from the judgment of the superior court of the county of Sacramento, under which he ivas sentenced to serve a term in state’s prison, having previously been convicted by a jury of "the crime of grand larceny.

*740The clerk’s transcript and the reporter’s transcript were filed in this court on the thirteenth day of November, 1917. No briefs have been filed and the time for the filing thereof has not been extended. The case was placed upon the April calendar of this court, at which time there was no appearance on behalf of appellant, and the attorney-general moved that it be submitted on the record. On the authority of *People*v. *Wagner, ante,*p. 41, [171 Pac. 699], and the cases therein cited, the judgment is affirmed.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judge Beales, Senior Judg e Annunziata and Re tired Judge Hodges ∗

WALTER J. BOOKER, SR. MEMORANDUM OPINION ∗∗ v. Record No. 0568-09-4 PER CURIAM SEPTEMBER 1, 2009 KENAN ADVANTAGE GROUP, INC. AND AMERICAN ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION

(Walter J. Booker, Sr., pro se , on brief).

(Lynn McHale Fitzpatrick; Frankl in & Prokopik, P.C., on brief), for appellees.

Walter J. Booker, Sr. (claimant) appeal s a decision of the Workers’ Compensation

Commission finding that he had failed to prove his need for unicondylar knee replacement

surgery is causally related to his work-related accident on March 30, 2006.

Notwithstanding the deficiencies in claima nt’s opening brief and appendix due to his

failure to comply with Rules 5A:20(d) and 5A:25, we have reviewed the record and the

commission’s opinion and fi nd that this appeal is without meri t. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Booker v. Kenan Advantage Group,

Inc. , VWC File No. 228-19-73 (Feb. 11, 2009). We disp ense with oral argument and summarily

affirm because the facts and legal contentions ar e adequately presented in the materials before

∗ Retired Judge Hodges took part in the consid eration of this case by designation pursuant to Code § 17.1-400(D).

∗∗ Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opin ion is not designa ted for publication.- 2 - the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403;

Rule 5A:27. 1

Affirmed.

1 In summarily affirming the commission’s deci sion, we considered only the issues which were properly before the commission and considered by it in rendering its decision.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-15-0000784 13-JUL-2017 09:37 AM
# Student Luis Solano wins InnoCentive Award

/ Published Nov. 13, 2014

On November 12, 2014, iCollege student Luis Solano was publicly recognized for solving a challenge titled "Pre-Event Insider Attack Recognition," for which he received a monetary award.  According to the organization's website, "InnoCentive is the open innovation and crowdsourcing pioneer that enables organizations to solve their key problems by connecting them to diverse sources of innovation including employees, customers, partners, and the world’s largest problem solving marketplace."  

Luis' bio and more info can be found at:  https://www.innocentive.com/ar/challenge/winningSolvers?offset=20&max=10&sor .  Congrats!!!   P.S.   Are you an iCollege student or alum who has won an award or obtained a leadership role in your organization?  If so, feel free to contact the college's Outreach Director, Patty Coopersmith at coopersmithp@ndu.edu to share your story.
FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 10/28/2015 12:27:30 PM PAM ESTES Clerk
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.8


MICHAEL PATRICK GEORGE
PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


June 9, 1998

Via Facsimile (415) 461-8341


Mr. Zach McReynolds
P.O. Box 1706
Ross, CA 94957

Dear Zach:

We are pleased to offer you the position of Vice President and Director of
Customer Solutions for Western Water Company. You will become a member of the
Company's senior management team and report directly to the President and Chief
Executive Officer.

<TABLE>
<S>                                  <C>
            Effective Date:          June 15, 1998

            Salary:                  $185,000 per annum

            Stock Options:           50,000 at market - date of hire
                                     75,000 at $15.50 per share
                                     75,000 at $21.00 per share

            Bonus:                   A new bonus plan is being developed
                                     for senior management of Western Water.
                                     When the plan is finalized,
                                     you will participate in that plan.
</TABLE>

Stock options vest over a three-year period at a rate of 33 1/3% per year and
are exercisable for ten years from the grant date. A copy of the Stock Option
Plan will be given to you upon acceptance into the Plan. Some or all of your
options may be subject to approval at our next shareholders meeting, which
should take place in September 1998.

On the first day of the month following 30 days of employment, you will be
eligible to participate in Western Water's medical insurance and long term
disability plans. Other benefit plans are being considered and, when adopted,
you will be eligible to participate in them.



<PAGE>   2


Zach McReynolds
June 9, 1998
Page 2


Employment will be at the Company's office in San Diego, California. Mutually
agreeable arrangements regarding moving you and your family will be provided.
You will be able to commute at Company expense once per week for a period of one
year.

All offers of employment are contingent upon proof of identity, authorization to
work in the United States and satisfactory reference checks.

Please be advised that you are employed "at will", and Western Water may
terminate your employment at any time. However, in the event of a change of
control of the Company which results in discontinuation of your employment, you
will receive continuation of your salary for a period of six months.

To accept this offer, please sign below and return a copy of this letter to me
as soon as possible.

Sincerely,




Michael Patrick George






Accepted: /s/ Zach McReynolds           Date: 6/9/98 .
         --------------------------           --------------------
#### ALFRED D. McKINSTRY, Appellant, *v.*GEORGE C. SAHLER, Respondent.

*Section*1303 *of Code of Civil Proceáme*— not *applicable to appeals from a justice’s court.*

Appeal from so much of an order of tbe County Court of Ulster county, as refused to dismiss an appeal in tbis action from a judgment of a justice's court, and as allowed the defendant to execute and file tbe undertaking required by section 356 of tbe Code of Civil Procedure, which be bad failed to do at tbe time of serving tbe notice of appeal.

Tbe court at General Term said : “ The only question here is whether section 1303 of tbe new Code, corresponding to section 327 of tbe old Code, and allowing amendments, when an appeal is taken in good faith, applies to an appeal from a justice’s court to a county court. It is decided in *Roberts*v. *Davids*(19 S. C. N. Y., 394) that it does not. And that part of tbe order appealed from should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements.”

*Augustus II. Van Duren*and *J. W. Fiero,*for tbe appellant. *8- F. Wood,*for tbe respondent.

Opinion by

Learned, P. J.

Present — Learned, P. J., Boardman and Bocees, JJ.

Tbe part of tbe order appealed from reversed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements, and appeal in County Court dismissed, with ten dollars costs.
No. 11-5785.

#### Valdez Ruiz *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 5th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
# **Exhibit32.2**

Certification of Chief Financial Officer ofCommercial National Financial Corporation

Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-K of Commercial National FinancialCorporation (the “Corporation”) for the period endingDecember 31, 2003 (the “Report”), I, Ryan M. Glista,Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| (1) |   | The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and                                                           |
|-----|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) |   | The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of CommercialNational Financial Corporation. |
|  |   | /s/ Ryan M.Glista      |   |
|--|--------|------------------------|--------|
|  |   | Ryan M. Glista         |   |
|  |   | Chief FinancialOfficer |   |
|  |   | March 26, 2004         |   |

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided toCommercial National Financial Corporation and will be retained byCommercial National Financial Corporation and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,753
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,670
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,185
<INVENTORY>                                      6,456
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,955
<PP&E>                                          45,639
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,714
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  81,353
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          171,543
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,170
<OTHER-SE>                                   (107,360)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    81,353
<SALES>                                         24,899
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,899
<CGS>                                           23,173
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,173
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                59,704
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (57,714)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (58,514)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (58,514)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.00)


</TABLE>
§ 54.620 Annual filing requirements and commitments. ( a ) *Annual filing requirement.* Health care providers seeking support under the RHC Program shall file new funding requests for each funding year consistent with the filing periods established under this subpart, except for health care providers who have received a multi-year funding commitment in this section.
( b ) *Long-term contracts.* If health care providers enter into long-term contracts for eligible services, the Administrator shall only commit funds to cover the portion of such a long-term contract scheduled to be delivered during the funding year for which universal service support is sought, except for multi-year funding commitments as described in this section.
( c ) *Multi-year commitments under the Healthcare Connect Fund Program.* Participants in the Healthcare Connect Fund Program are permitted to enter into multi-year contracts for eligible expenses and may receive funding commitments from the Administrator for a period that covers up to three years of funding. If a long-term contract covers a period of more than three years, the applicant may also have the contract designated as “evergreen” under § 54.622(i)(3), which will allow the applicant to re-apply for funding under the contract after three years without having to undergo additional competitive bidding.
§ 80.99 Radiotelegraph station identification. This section applies to coast, ship and survival craft stations authorized to transmit in the band 405-525 kHz. ( a ) The station transmitting radiotelegraph emissions must be identified by its call sign. The call sign must be transmitted with the telegraphy emission normally used by the station. The call sign must be transmitted at 20 minute intervals when transmission is sustained for more than 20 minutes. When a ship station is exchanging public correspondence communications, the identification may be deferred until completion of each communication with any other station.
( b ) The requirements of this section do not apply to survival craft stations when transmitting distress signals automatically or when operating on 121.500 MHz for radiobeacon purposes.
( c ) Emergency position indicating radiobeacon stations do not require identification.
Exhibit 8.1

Significant Subsidiaries

The following is a list of all of our significant subsidiaries, including the name, country of incorporation or residence, the proportion of our ownership
interest in each and, if different, the proportion of voting power held by us.

|Name of Subsidiary                           |  | Country of Incorporation
or Residence |  | Percentage of
Ownership
Interest |  | Percentage of Voting
Power (if Different from
Ownership
Interest)
|-------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|NICE Systems, Inc.                           |  | United States                         |  | 100%                             |  |                                                                 
|NICE Systems GmbH                            |  | Germany                               |  | 100%                             |  |                                                                 
|NICE Systems Canada Ltd.                     |  | Canada                                |  | 100%                             |  |                                                                 
|NICE CTI Systems UK Ltd.                     |  | United Kingdom                        |  | 100%                             |  |                                                                 
|STS Software Systems (1993) Ltd.             |  | Israel                                |  | 100%                             |  |                                                                 
|NICE APAC Ltd.                               |  | Hong Kong                             |  | 100%                             |  |                                                                 
|NiceEye BV                                   |  | Netherlands                           |  | 100%                             |  |                                                                 
|NiceEye Ltd.                                 |  | Israel                                |  | 100%                             |  |                                                                 
|Nice Systems SARL                            |  | France                                |  | 100%                             |  |                                                                 
|Racal Recorders Ltd                          |  | United Kingdom                        |  | 100%                             |  |                                                                 
|Nice Interactive Solutions India Private Ltd |  | India                                 |  | 100%                             |  |                                                                 

---



QuickLinks
D ismiss and Opinion Filed February 26, 2014. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 14 - 00211 - CV IN RE KENNETH HALL , Relator Original Proceeding from the 194th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F09 - 71471 - HPM



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices O'Neill, Lang, and Brown Opinion by Justice Lang Before the Court is relator’s post

- conviction petition for writ of habeas corpus
com plaining that he was convicted based on evidence obtained from an unlawful arrest and from an unconstitutional search and seizure and that he was denied assistance of counsel. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount th em herein. This Court lacks jurisdiction over post

- conviction writs of habeas corpus in felony cases. See T EX . C ODE C RIM . P ROC . A NN . art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2010); In re Hampton , No. 05

- 07

- 00440

- CV, 2007 WL 1168446 at *1 (Tex. App.

– Dallas Apr. 20, 2007, or ig. proceeding) (mem. op.). Accordingly, we DISMISS the petition for writ of habeas corpus.

140211F.P05 /Douglas S. Lang/ DOUGLAS LANG JUSTICE