alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21

                         Subsidiaries of the Company

                           Jurisdiction           Names Under Which
Subsidiary                 of Incorporation       Subsidiary Does Business
----------                 ----------------       ------------------------

Ingleby Holding Corp.      Delaware

Caribiner, Inc.            New York               Caribiner Communications
                                                  Total Audio Visual Services
                                                  Show Solutions
                                                  Spectrum Data Systems

Entertainment Trademark    New York               
 Consultants, Inc.                                

Bauer Audio Visual, Inc.   Texas                  Total Audio Video Services

Caribiner Europe Limited   United Kingdom

Caribiner Holdings (UK)    United Kingdom         
 No. 2 Limited                                    

Caribiner Holdings (UK)    United Kingdom         Spectrum Communications
 Limited                                          Mark Wallace Associates (MWA)
                                                  WCT Live Communication

Caribiner Services         United Kingdom
 Limited

Visual Action Holdings     United Kingdom
 plc

Visual Action Holdings                            Audio Visual Headquarters
 Inc.                                             Hospitality Resources

Cinevideo Ltd.             United Kingdom
No. 11-8432.

#### Wearing *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 22.882 Designated entities. ( a ) Eligibility for small business provisions in the commercial Air-Ground Radiotelephone Service. ( 1 ) A small business is an entity that, together with its affiliates, its controlling interests and the affiliates of its controlling interests, has average gross revenues that are not more than $40 million for the preceding three years.
( 2 ) A very small business is an entity that, together with its affiliates, its controlling interests and the affiliates of its controlling interests, has average gross revenues that are not more than $15 million for the preceding three years.
( b ) Bidding credits in the commercial Air-Ground Radiotelephone Service. ( 1 ) A winning bidder that qualifies as a small business, as defined in this section, or a consortium of small businesses may use a bidding credit of 15 percent, as specified in § 1.2110(f)(2)(iii) of this chapter, to lower the cost of its winning bid on a commercial Air-Ground Radiotelephone Service license.
( 2 ) A winning bidder that qualifies as a very small business, as defined in this section, or a consortium of very small businesses may use a bidding credit of 25 percent, as specified in § 1.2110(f)(2)(ii) of this chapter, to lower the cost of its winning bid on a commercial Air-Ground Radiotelephone Service license.
[70 FR 76417, Dec. 27, 2005]
§ 64.6215 Reporting requirements. ( a ) Every six months, for the periods January through June and July through December, a certified program shall submit data to the Commission in the following categories: ( 1 ) Each Equipment recipient's identity and other relevant characteristics;
( 2 ) Information about the Equipment provided, including costs;
( 3 ) Information about assessments, installation, and training, including costs;
( 4 ) Information about local outreach undertaken, including costs; and
( 5 ) Promptness of service.
( b ) The categories of information to be reported may be supplemented by the Chief, Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, as necessary to further the purposes of the program and prevent fraud, waste, and abuse. Reports are due 60 days after the end of a reporting period. The specific items of information to be reported in each category and the manner in which they are to be reported shall be set forth in instructions issued by the NDBEDP Administrator.
( c ) With each report, the chief executive officer, chief financial officer, or other senior executive of the certified program, such as a director or manager, with first-hand knowledge of the accuracy and completeness of the information provided in the report, must certify as follows:
I swear under penalty of perjury that I am (name and title), an officer of the above-named reporting entity, and that the entity has policies and procedures in place to ensure that recipients satisfy the NDBEDP eligibility requirements, that the entity is in compliance with the Commission's NDBEDP rules, that I have examined the foregoing reports and that all requested information has been provided, and all statements of fact are true and an accurate statement of the business activities conducted pursuant to the NDBEDP by the above-named certified program.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Annette L. Hammer, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Erie County,

September 18, 1970.

*85
      *Falk, Siemer, Glick, Tuppen d Maloney (Richard G. Marcus*of counsel), for Blue Cross of Western New York, Inc. *Ryan, Betel, Whitcher d Dopkins (Richard B. Dopkins*of counsel), for executor. *Robert J. Blarney*for Eileen McClafferty, residuary legatee.

William J. Regax, S.

This is a claim for return of medical payments made allegedly on behalf of deceased by Blue Cross of Western New York, Inc., which was acting, to use its own terms, as “ fiscal intermediary ” for the Department of Health, Education and Welfare.

The facts stipulated at the hearing held in this court on September 15, 1970 were essentially that on or about October 28, *1967*deceased was transferred as a patient from Buffalo General Hospital to the Nazareth Nursing Home at 291 West North Street, Buffalo, New York. It is conceded for the purposes of this litigation that the Nazareth Nursing Home on that date was not a participating extended care facility so as to make its patients eligible for Medicare benefits under the requirements of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare. It is also conceded that just three days later,, on November 1, 1967, the Nazareth Nursing Home did in fact become a fully participating extended care facility. It is because of these three days that Blue Cross of Western New York, Inc., as “fiscal intermediary ”, attempted to recover all the payments made for the entire period of hospitalization of this deceased in the Nazareth Nursing Home. These payments totaling $900 were made allegedly in error and it is for this sum that reimbursement from this estate is sought.

Counsel for Blue Cross of Western New York, Inc., stated on the record that the regulations provided that, unless a nursing facility was a ‘ ‘ participating extended care facility ’ ’ under the requirements of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare at the time of commencement of hospitalization, then any and all medical services thereafter rendered by the nursing facility would not be covered by Medicare. They stated that as authority for this there was a regulation of the Federal agency to this effect, but stated that this agency took the position that under its rules and regulations it would not disclose this regulation and would not permit it to be put into evidence in this court. In other words, they insisted upon repayment based upon a Federal regulation which they refused to prove. !

*86There being no other basis proven to show that the payments were made in violation of any proven Federal rule or regulation, the court is left with no alternative but to decide that this claim for reimbursement by Blue Cross of Western New York, Inc., should be dismissed.
§ 8.219 Approval/recognition of Cybersecurity Label Administrators. ( a ) An accredited third-party entity wishing to become a Cybersecurity Label Administrator (CLA) must file a written application with the Commission. The Commission may approve the written application for the accredited third-party entity to be recognized and authorized by the Commission as a CLA to manage and administer the labeling program by meeting the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section. An accredited third-party entity is recognized and authorized by the Commission to manage and administer the labeling program in accordance with the Commission's rules in this subpart.
( b ) In the United States, the Commission, in accordance with its procedures, allows qualified accrediting bodies to accredit CLAs based on ISO/IEC 17065 and other qualification criteria. CLAs shall comply with the requirements in § 8.220.
§ 76.943 Fines. ( a ) A franchising authority may impose fines or monetary forfeitures on a cable operator that does not comply with a rate decision or refund order directed specifically at the cable operator, provided the franchising authority has such power under state or local laws.
( b ) If a cable operator willfully fails to comply with the terms of any franchising authority's order, decision, or request for information, as required by § 76.939, the Commission may, in addition to other remedies, impose a forfeiture pursuant to section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 503(b).
( c ) A cable operator shall not be subject to forfeiture because its rate for basic service or equipment is determined to be unreasonable.
[58 FR 29753, May 21, 1993, as amended at 59 FR 17974, Apr. 15, 1994]
EX-10.2.1



 





EXHIBIT 10.2.1




FIRST AMENDMENT

TO THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT FOR

JOSEPH F. JEAMEL, JR.



WHEREAS, Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr. (the “Executive”) currently serves as Executive Vice President of
Rockville Bank (the “Bank”) pursuant to the Employment Agreement by and among, the Bank, Rockville
Financial, Inc. (the “Company”) and the Executive effective as of May 20, 2005;



WHEREAS, Bank, the Company and the Executive wish to amend the term of the Employment Agreement,
subject to the conditions contained herein;



NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the parties hereby agree as follows:



1. Effective as of December 22, 2006, Section 2 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended in
its entirety to read as follows:





“2. Term.




     Effective as of December 22, 2006, the term of employment of Executive under this
Agreement (the “Term”) shall be the period commencing on the Effective Date and ending on
December 31, 2007, except that the Term will end at a date prior to the end of such period
or extension thereof, specified in Section 6 or 7 in the event of termination of
Executive’s employment. The foregoing notwithstanding, in the event there occurs a
Potential Change in Control during the period of 60 days prior to December 31, 2007, the
Term shall be extended automatically at that December 31 by an additional period such that
the Term will extend until the 180th day following such Potential Change in
Control.”


2. This First Amendment shall supersede the provisions of the Employment Agreement to the extent
those provisions are inconsistent with the provisions of this First Amendment. Executive
acknowledges that Executive has received good and valuable consideration from the Company and/or
Bank for this Amendment, and has had an opportunity to discuss this Amendment with advisors of
Executive’s choosing.




 









 








     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive has hereunto set his hand and the Bank and the Company have
each caused this First Amendment to be duly executed on this ___day of December, 2006.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL, INC
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	BY:	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name:	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	ROCKVILLE BANK
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	BY:	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name:	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	EXECUTIVE
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, Agriculture.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. No. 106-393) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Davy Crockett National Forest Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) meeting will meet on September 21, 2006.

# DATES:

The Davy Crockett National Forest RAC meeting will be held on September 21, 2006.

# ADDRESSES:

The Davy Crockett National Forest RAC meeting will be held at the Davy Crockett Ranger Station located on State Highway 7, approximately one-quarter mile west of FM 227 in Houston County, Texas. The meeting will begin at 6 p.m. and adjourn at approximately 9 p.m. There will be a public comment period.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Raoul Gagne, District Ranger, Davy Crockett National Forest, Rt. 1, Box 55 FS, Kennard, Texas 75847: Telephone 936-655-2299 or e-mail at                         *rgagne@fs.fed.us.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Davy Crockett National Forest RAC proposes projects and funding to the Secretary of Agriculture under section 203 of the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self Determination Act of 2000. The purpose of the September 21, 2006 meeting is to review the status of approved projects and discuss and approve additional project proposals to submit to the Forest Supervisor for the National Forests and Grasslands in Texas. These meetings are open to the public. The public may present written comments to the RAC. Each formal RAC meeting will also have time allocated for hearing public comments. Depending on the number of persons wishing to comment and time available, the time for individual oral comments may be limited.

Dated: August 17, 2006.

Raoul W. Gagne,

Designated Federal Officer, Davy Crockett National Forest RAC.

[FR Doc. 06-7098 Filed 8-22-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
§ 68.350 Revocation of Supplier's Declaration of Conformity. ( a ) The Commission may revoke any Supplier's Declaration of Conformity for cause in accordance with the provisions of this section or in the event changes in technical standards published by the Administrative Council for Terminal Attachments require the revocation of any outstanding Supplier's Declaration of Conformity in order to achieve the objectives of part 68.
( b ) Cause for revocation. In addition to the provisions in § 68.211, the Commission may revoke a Supplier's Declaration of Conformity: ( 1 ) For false statements or representations made in materials or responses submitted to the Commission and/or the Administrative Council for Terminal Attachments, or in records required to be kept by § 68.324 and the Administrative Council for Terminal Attachments.
( 2 ) If upon subsequent inspection or operation it is determined that the equipment does not conform to the pertinent technical requirements.
( 3 ) If it is determined that changes have been made in the equipment other that those authorized by this part or otherwise expressly authorized by the Commission.
[66 FR 7587, Jan. 24, 2001]
#### Maxine Gerard, Inc., Plaintiff, *v.*John A. Fisher, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

September 14, 1970.

*Brady, Tarpey & Joyce (Ira H. Leibowits and John J. Palmeri*of counsel), for plaintiff. *Joseph P. Allen*for defendant.

Vincent A. Ltjpiano, J.

Plaintiff moves for summary judgment in this action for declaratory judgment. Defendant cross-moves for judgment declaring rights and relations in his favor or, in the alternative, for an order of preclusion.

At the request of the owner, plaintiff, a real estate broker, listed and sold a condominium unit. The owner was represented by the defendant. Contract of sale was executed April 15, 1969 providing for payment of commissions to plaintiff. Closing *292occurred on May 28,1969. Payment of commissions was refused at that time. Defendant received an amount equivalent to the commissions as provided to be held by him in an interest-bearing account. Plaintiff did not consent to that arrangement.

Plaintiff urges that a novel question of law is alone involved. That question is whether a licensed real estate broker must be a licensed securities dealer to earn and receive a broker’s commission on the resale of a condominium unit. Defendant contends that a condominium unit is a security interest, and the right to earn and receive a commission rests on the possession of a security dealer’s license.

Section 339-g of article 9-B, Condominium Act, of the Real Property Law provides: “ Status of units. Each unit, together with its common interest, shall for all purposes constitute real property. ” Defendant argues, however, that section 352-e of the General Business Law applies. It is contained in article 23-A which regulates fraudulent practices in respect of stocks, bonds and other securities. Section 352-e pertains specifically to real estate syndication offerings. The various sections and subdivisions following 352-e clearly indicate the legislative intent to regulate thereby the original organization and public offering. Violation may result in prosecution by the Attorney-General or in civil suit by investors against those only responsible for misleading prospectus *(Steingart*v. *21 Assoc.,*31 Misc 2d 212). In addition, section 339-ee of the Real Property Law pertaining to “ effect of other laws ”, provides, in part, in subdivision 1 thereof: All units of a property which shall be submitted to the provisions of this article shall be deemed to be cooperative interests in realty within the meaning of section three hundred fifty-two-e of the general business law. Article nin'e-a of the real property law shall not apply to the property or any unit. ’ ’ Article 9-A pertains to the subdividing of lands pursuant to original plan. The resale of an interest in real property is unrelated to an original sale in a syndication constituting a sale of securities. In the latter situation a securities license is required. On the resale of a unit previously acquired by syndication, the supervisory purposes have been exhausted and possession of a broker’s license suffices.

Plaintiff’s motion is granted, and defendant’s cross motion is denied. Settle order.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-41123 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus GARY DEAN FISHER, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-98-CR-117-1

- - - - - - - - - - May 10, 1999 Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Gary Dean Fisher appeals his conviction, following a jury trial, for possessing approximately 129 kilograms of marijuana with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B). The evidence was not insufficient to support the conviction. See United States v. El-Zoubi , 993 F.2d 442, 445 (5th Cir. 1993). Although the marijuana was concealed in a hidden compartment in Fisher’s fishing boat, there was circumstantial evidence, including evidence that the boat had been altered in a manner that should have been apparent toNo. 98-41123 -2- Fisher, that he had knowledge of the presence of marijuana in the

boat. See United States v. Cano-Guel , 167 F.3d 900, 904 (5th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ortega Reyna , 148 F.3d 540, 544 (5th Cir. 1998).
AFFIRMED.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JEAN L. CESAR

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 2 2

- 2001

[ October 6, 2022 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.8 0 0 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach C ounty ; Jeffrey Dana Gillen

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2012 CF 013421 AXXXMB

.

Jean L. Cesar

, Century

, pro se

.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY

, F ORST and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
§ 80.969 Illumination of operating controls. ( a ) The radiotelephone must have dial lights which illuminate the operating controls at the principal operating position.
( b ) Instead of dial lights, a light from an electric lamp may be provided to illuminate the operating controls of the radiotelephone at the principal operating position. If a reserve power supply is required, arrangements must permit the use of that power supply for illumination within one minute.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# DATE AND TIME:

Tuesday, August 29, 2006 at 10 a.m.

# PLACE:

999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

# STATUS:

This meeting will be open to the public.

# ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

Correction and Approval of Minutes.

Advisory Opinion 2006-21: Cantwell 2006 by Matthew S. Butler, Campaign Manager.

Advisory Opinion 2006-26: Texans for Henry Bonilla by counsel, Jan Witold Baran.

Proposed Interim Final Rule Exempting Grassroots Lobbying Communications from the  Definition of “Electioneering Communication.”

Notice of Disposition of Petition for Rulemaking to Except Certain “Grassroots Lobbying” 

Communications from the Definition of “Electioneering Communication.”

Management and Administrative Matters.

# DATE and TIME:

Tuesday, August 29, 2006 at the conclusion of the open meeting and Wednesday, August 30, 2006.

# PLACE:

999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.

Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C. 

Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration.

Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a particular employee.

# PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:

Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 06-7162  Filed 8-22-06; 2:33 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M