Name: Dennis Laybourn

Title: Environmental Manager

Company: Newmont Nevada Energy Investment

Sign Date: 8/31/2010

Name: Alan Roylance

Title: Chief Technical Officer

Company: Western Environmental and Testing,

Sign Date:

Permitted Facility Representative / Date Testing Company Representative / Date

TS Power Plant ICR

Final Test Report 

for

/ /

Based on information and belief formed 

after reasonable inquiry, I certify that the 

statements and information in this test 

report are true, accurate, and complete.

I have reviewed all testing details and 

results in this test report and hereby 

certify that the test report is authentic 

and accurate.

Friday, February 11, 2011 Page 1 of 26
TS Power Plant ICR

8/31/2010

Facility Information:

TS Power Plant

450 TS Power Plant Road

Beowawe NV 89821

Contact: Dennis Laybourn

Phone: 775-635-6590

Fax: 775-468-1889

Email: dennis.laybourn@newmont.com

Testing Company:

Western Environmental Services and Testing, Inc.

913 Foster Road

Casper W 82601

Contact:J. Scott Mortimer

Phone: 800-545-5711

Fax: 307-234-8324

Email: smortimer@testair.com

Air Permit Number:

56224

Permitted Source ID/Name:

BLR100 Enter the Boiler ID of the tested boiler (left)

Permitted Maximum Process Rate:

N/A

Max. Normal Operation Process Rate:

N/A

Target Process Test Rate

N/A

Description of the source (including control equipment). Please see the attachments for source or

 process flow diagram:

TS Power Plant is a 242 MW (gross) electrical generating unit. It is a dry bottom, wall fired, pulverized coal fired 

unit that burns sub-bituminous coal. Emission controls include selective catalytic reduction, powdered activated 

carbon injection, dry scrubber and fabric filter baghouse.

Industry/SCC/NAIS 221112

Sampling Location Information:

Test Parameter Information:

AFS #: Enter ARS ID FRS #: Enter FRS ID

SCC / Description 10100222 External Combustion Boilers - Electric Generation - Bituminous/Subbituminous 

Coal - Pulverized Coal: Dry Bottom (Subbituminous Coal) 

The following state and federal regulations that apply to the proposed testing:

Location

Round

Duct

Diam.

Distance from 

upstream dist.

Distance from

downstream dist.

Number of

Traverse Ports

Equiv. 

Diam

Min.Travers 

Points

Rect. Duct 

Length /Width

Stack Exit 199.3 0 0 0 176 154 4 12

Target

Parameter 

Test

Method

Number of

Test Runs

Test Run

Duration

Sample 

Location Points Comments

Stack Exit % H2O Method 1 - 4 3 180 0

Stack Exit Carbon Monoxide Method 10 3 120 0

Stack Exit Formaldehyde Method 0011 3 120 0

Total organic compounds 

(TOC) as Propane

Stack Exit Method 25A 3 120 0

Stack Exit Hydrogen Chloride Method 26 3 180 0

Stack Exit Hydrogen Fluoride Method 26 3 180 0

Stack Exit Hydrogen Fluoride Method 26A 3 180 0

Friday, February 11, 2011 Page 2 of 26
TS Power Plant ICR

8/31/2010

The following describes any modifications and/or deviations to the applicable test 

methods. If alternative methods were requested, see the attachments for documentation 

of request AND approval, including dates.

No modifications or deviations to applicable test methods

Stack Exit Hydrogen Chloride Method 26A 3 180 0

Total PM2.5 OTM - 27/28 3 240 0 The correct date for 

Run 1 is 6/17/2010

Stack Exit

Filterable Particulate OTM - 27/28 3 240 0 The correct date for 

Run 1 is 6/17/2010

Stack Exit

Filterable PM2.5 OTM - 27/28 3 240 0 The correct date for 

Run 1 is 6/17/2010

Stack Exit

Organic Condensible 

Particulate

OTM - 27/28 3 240 0 The correct date for 

Run 1 is 6/17/2010

Stack Exit

Total Particulate OTM - 27/28 3 240 0 The correct date for 

Run 1 is 6/17/2010

Stack Exit

Inorganic (Aqueous) 

Condensible Part.

OTM - 27/28 3 240 0 The correct date for 

Run 1 is 6/17/2010

Stack Exit

Stack Exit Nickel Method 29 3 240 0

Stack Exit Antimony Method 29 3 240 0

Stack Exit Arsenic Method 29 3 240 0

Stack Exit Beryllium Method 29 3 240 0

Stack Exit Cadmium Method 29 3 240 0

Stack Exit Chromium Method 29 3 240 0

Stack Exit Lead Method 29 3 240 0

Stack Exit Magnesium Method 29 3 240 0

Stack Exit Mercury Method 29 3 240 0

Stack Exit Selenium Method 29 3 240 0

Stack Exit Filterable Particulate Method 29 3 240 0

Stack Exit Manganese Method 29 3 240 0

Stack Exit O2 Method 3A O2 3 480 0

Stack Exit O2 Method 3A O2 3 240 0

Stack Exit Co2 Method 3A CO2 3 120 0

Stack Exit O2 Method 3A O2 3 120 0

Stack Exit Filterable Particulate Method 5 3 240 0

Stack Exit Sulfur Dioxide Method 6C 3 180 0

Stack Exit Nitrogen oxides (NOx) Method 7E 3 180 0

Friday, February 11, 2011 Page 3 of 26
TS Power Plant ICR

8/31/2010

Sampling / Stack Data Results Summary

Location Stack Exit - Method 25A

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Location Stack Exit - Method 26A

Average

Run Number 1 2 3

Test Date 6/18/2010 6/19/2010 6/19/2010

Run Start Time 2:49:00 PM 9:22:00 

AM

12:42:00 PM

Run Finish Time 6:00:00 PM 12:34:00 

PM

3:51:00 PM

Net Run Time, minutes 180 180 180

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 117.908 121.291 116.273 118.491

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 14.38 14.16 14.48 14.340

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 74.50 77.04 77.27 76.270

Carbon Dioxide, % 13.1 13 13.6 13.233

Oxygen, % 6.2 6.6 6.1 6.300

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 189.33 190.89 191.03 190.417

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 523,193.9 535,819.7 528,863.2 529,292.267

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 895,078.1 916,525.6 908,206.6 906,603.433

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 100.9 101.4 98.4 100.233

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Friday, February 11, 2011 Page 4 of 26
TS Power Plant ICR

8/31/2010

Location Stack Exit - Method 29

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Net Run Time, minutes

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, %

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, %

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, %

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Fw

Fc

Location Stack Exit - Method 3A CO2

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Friday, February 11, 2011 Page 5 of 26
TS Power Plant ICR

8/31/2010

Location Stack Exit - Method 3A CO2 3

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Location Stack Exit - Method 3A CO2 3 6

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Friday, February 11, 2011 Page 6 of 26
TS Power Plant ICR

8/31/2010

Location Stack Exit - Method 3A O2

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Location Stack Exit - Method 3A O2 3

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Friday, February 11, 2011 Page 7 of 26
TS Power Plant ICR

8/31/2010

Location Stack Exit - Method 3A O2 3 6

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Location Stack Exit - OTM - 27/28

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Net Run Time, minutes

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, %

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, %

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, %

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Fw

Fc

Friday, February 11, 2011 Page 8 of 26
TS Power Plant ICR

8/31/2010

Emissions Summary

Location: Stack Exit - Method 25A

Compound: Total organic compounds (TOC) as 

Average

Run 1 2 3

lb/mmBtuO2 8.75E-04 1.36E-03 1.41E-03 0.001

ppm 5.65E-01 8.75E-01 8.99E-01 0.780

ppm@7%O2 5.20E-01 8.05E-01 8.39E-01 0.721

Location: Stack Exit - Method 26A

Compound: Hydrogen Chloride

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.250

Elb/hr 1.47E-01 1.46E-01 1.50E-01 0.148

lb/mmBtuO2 6.50E-05 6.50E-05 6.55E-05 0.000

mg/dscm 7.49E-02 7.28E-02 7.59E-02 0.075

mg/dscm@7%O2 7.08E-02 7.08E-02 7.13E-02 0.071

Compound: Hydrogen Fluoride

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.250

Elb/hr 1.47E-01 1.46E-01 1.50E-01 0.148

lb/mmBtuO2 6.50E-05 6.50E-05 6.55E-05 0.000

mg/dscm 7.49E-02 7.28E-02 7.59E-02 0.075

mg/dscm@7%O2 7.08E-02 7.08E-02 7.13E-02 0.071

Location: Stack Exit - Method 29

Compound: Antimony

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001

Elb/hr 4.52E-04 4.42E-04 4.28E-04 0.000

lb/mmBtuO2 1.98E-07 1.89E-07 1.95E-07 0.000

mg/dscm 2.22E-04 2.18E-04 2.23E-04 0.000

mg/dscm@7%O2 2.16E-04 2.06E-04 2.12E-04 0.000

Compound: Arsenic

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.00108 0.00103 0.001 0.001

Elb/hr 4.89E-04 4.56E-04 4.28E-04 0.000

lb/mmBtuO2 2.14E-07 1.95E-07 1.95E-07 0.000

mg/dscm 2.40E-04 2.24E-04 2.23E-04 0.000

mg/dscm@7%O2 2.33E-04 2.12E-04 2.12E-04 0.000

Compound: Beryllium

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.00025 0.00025 0.00025 0.000

Friday, February 11, 2011 Page 9 of 26
TS Power Plant ICR

8/31/2010

Elb/hr 1.13E-04 1.11E-04 1.07E-04 0.000

lb/mmBtuO2 4.95E-08 4.72E-08 4.87E-08 0.000

mg/dscm 5.55E-05 5.44E-05 5.57E-05 0.000

mg/dscm@7%O2 5.39E-05 5.14E-05 5.30E-05 0.000

Compound: Cadmium

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.00205 0.00085 0.00349 0.002

Elb/hr 9.28E-04 3.76E-04 1.49E-03 0.001

lb/mmBtuO2 4.06E-07 1.61E-07 6.80E-07 0.000

mg/dscm 4.55E-04 1.85E-04 7.78E-04 0.000

mg/dscm@7%O2 4.42E-04 1.75E-04 7.41E-04 0.000

Compound: Chromium

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.02624 0.00538 0.00548 0.012

Elb/hr 1.19E-02 2.38E-03 2.34E-03 0.006

lb/mmBtuO2 5.20E-06 1.02E-06 1.07E-06 0.000

mg/dscm 5.83E-03 1.17E-03 1.22E-03 0.003

mg/dscm@7%O2 5.67E-03 1.11E-03 1.16E-03 0.003

Compound: Filterable Particulate

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 36.21 36.99 29.6 34.267

Elb/hr 1.64E+01 1.64E+01 1.27E+01 15.167

lb/mmBtuO2 7.17E-03 6.99E-03 5.77E-03 0.007

mg/dscm 8.04E+00 8.05E+00 6.60E+00 7.563

mg/dscm@7%O2 7.82E+00 7.61E+00 6.28E+00 7.237

Compound: Lead

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.00326 0.00427 0.00552 0.004

Elb/hr 1.48E-03 1.89E-03 2.36E-03 0.002

lb/mmBtuO2 6.46E-07 8.07E-07 1.08E-06 0.000

mg/dscm 7.24E-04 9.30E-04 1.23E-03 0.001

mg/dscm@7%O2 7.04E-04 8.79E-04 1.17E-03 0.001

Compound: Magnesium

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0 0 0 0.000

Elb/hr 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.000

lb/mmBtuO2 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.000

mg/dscm 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.000

mg/dscm@7%O2 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.000

Compound: Manganese

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.0194 0.00975 0.01193 0.014

Friday, February 11, 2011 Page 10 of 26
TS Power Plant ICR

8/31/2010

Elb/hr 8.78E-03 4.31E-03 5.10E-03 0.006

lb/mmBtuO2 3.84E-06 1.84E-06 2.32E-06 0.000

mg/dscm 4.31E-03 2.12E-03 2.66E-03 0.003

mg/dscm@7%O2 4.19E-03 2.00E-03 2.53E-03 0.003

Compound: Mercury

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.005 0.00355 0.00538 0.005

Elb/hr 2.26E-03 1.57E-03 2.30E-03 0.002

lb/mmBtuO2 9.91E-07 6.71E-07 1.05E-06 0.000

mg/dscm 1.11E-03 7.73E-04 1.20E-03 0.001

mg/dscm@7%O2 1.08E-03 7.31E-04 1.14E-03 0.001

Compound: Nickel

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.01153 0.0084 0.00757 0.009

Elb/hr 5.22E-03 3.72E-03 3.24E-03 0.004

lb/mmBtuO2 2.28E-06 1.59E-06 1.47E-06 0.000

mg/dscm 2.56E-03 1.83E-03 1.69E-03 0.002

mg/dscm@7%O2 2.49E-03 1.73E-03 1.61E-03 0.002

Compound: Selenium

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.003

Elb/hr 1.13E-03 1.11E-03 1.07E-03 0.001

lb/mmBtuO2 4.95E-07 4.72E-07 4.87E-07 0.000

mg/dscm 5.55E-04 5.44E-04 5.57E-04 0.001

mg/dscm@7%O2 5.39E-04 5.14E-04 5.30E-04 0.001

Location: Stack Exit - OTM - 27/28

Compound: Filterable Particulate

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 13.79 11.65 19.43 14.957

lb/mmBtuO2 4.59E-03 3.28E-03 5.84E-03 0.005

Compound: Filterable PM2.5

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 5.56 9.35 10.1 8.337

lb/mmBtuO2 1.85E-03 2.64E-03 3.04E-03 0.003

Compound: Inorganic (Aqueous) Condensible Pa

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 20 19 17 18.667

lb/mmBtuO2 6.65E-03 5.35E-03 5.11E-03 0.006

Compound: Organic Condensible Particulate

Average

Friday, February 11, 2011 Page 11 of 26
TS Power Plant ICR

8/31/2010

Process Run Data

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0 0 0 0.000

lb/mmBtuO2 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.000

Compound: Total Particulate

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 33.79 36.65 36.43 35.623

lb/mmBtuO2 1.12E-02 1.03E-02 1.10E-02 0.011

Compound: Total PM2.5

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 25.56 28.35 27.1 27.003

lb/mmBtuO2 8.50E-03 7.99E-03 8.15E-03 0.008

Friday, February 11, 2011 Page 12 of 26
TS Power Plant ICR

8/31/2010

Process Run Data

Run Name Value UOM Comments

Target

Value

1 Heat Input 19710 Million Btus Run 1 (June 17, 

2010 07:00-

17:00)) = Method 

29 Run 1 (07:47-

12:03), Method 

29 Run 2 (12:19-

16:32) and 

OM27/OM28 Run 

1 (10:45-16:02)

1 Average Heat Input 1971 MMBtu/hr 2000

1 Steam Output 1425 1000 lb steam/hr 1400

1 Flue Gas Flow Rate 494968 dscfm

1 Sorbent Type and Sorbent Injection Rate (if 

applicable)

35462 lb/hr 0 lime + recycle ash

1 Flue Gas Oxygen Content 6.4 % 0

1 Flue Gas Carbon Dioxide Content 13.2 % 0

1 Flue Gas Moisture Content 13.25 % 0

1 Flue Gas Sampling Point Temperature 189 Deg F 0

1 Flue Gas Pressure 0.85 atm 0

1 Standard Pressure 2.036 atm 0

1 Standard Temperature 68 Deg F 0

1 Unit Gross Electrical Output 235.1 MW 235

1 Unit Net Electric Generation 213.4 MWh Also includes 

Method 3A CO2 

Runs 1 -3 (10:22-

16:55) and Method 

3A O2 (10:22-

16:55)

212

2 Heat Input 22935 Million Btus Run 2 (June 18, 

2010, 07:00-

18:00) - Includes 

M29 Run 3 

(07:48 - 11:59), 

M26A Run 1 

(14:49-18:00), 

OTM 27/28 Run 2 

(07:45-13:55)

2 Average Heat Input 2085 MMBtu/hr 2000

2 Steam Output 1.392 1000 lb steam/hr 1400

2 Flue Gas Flow Rate 480900 dscfm

2 Sorbent Type and Sorbent Injection Rate (if 

applicable)

36281 lb/hr Lime and Recycle 

Ash

0

Friday, February 11, 2011 Page 13 of 26
TS Power Plant ICR

8/31/2010

2 Flue Gas Oxygen Content 6.26 % 0

2 Flue Gas Carbon Dioxide Content 13.28 % 0

2 Flue Gas Moisture Content 14.03 % 0

2 Flue Gas Sampling Point Temperature 190 Deg F 0

2 Flue Gas Pressure 0.85 atm 0

2 Standard Pressure 2.036 atm 0

2 Standard Temperature 68 Deg F 0

2 Unit Gross Electrical Output 233 MW 235

2 Unit Net Electric Generation 212 MWh Also Includes 

CO2 and O2 (Run 

1B (7:28-9:29), 

Run 2B (9:42-

11:44), Run 3B 

(14:11-16:14))

212

3 Heat Input 18378 Million Btus Run 3 - June 19, 

2010 (08:00-

17:00) - Includes 

Method 26A Run 

2 (9:22-12:34), 

Run 3 (12:41-

15:51); OTM 

27/28 Run 3 (8:54-

14:55); Method 

30B (Run 3 (8:49-

10:54), Run 4 

(11:03-13:58), 

Run 5 (14:06-

16:24)

3 Average Heat Input 2042 MMBtu/hr 2000

3 Steam Output 1387 1000 lb steam/hr 1400

3 Flue Gas Flow Rate 487173 dscfm

3 Sorbent Type and Sorbent Injection Rate (if 

applicable)

39008 lb/hr Lime and Recycle 

Ash

0

3 Flue Gas Oxygen Content 6.11 % 0

3 Flue Gas Carbon Dioxide Content 13.23 % 0

3 Flue Gas Moisture Content 14.24 % 0

3 Flue Gas Sampling Point Temperature 190 Deg F 0

3 Flue Gas Pressure 0.85 atm 0

3 Standard Pressure 2.036 atm 0

3 Standard Temperature 68 Deg F 0

3 Unit Gross Electrical Output 228 MW 235

Friday, February 11, 2011 Page 14 of 26
TS Power Plant ICR

8/31/2010

APCD Run Data

3 Unit Net Electric Generation 207 MWh Also includes 

CO2 and O2 Run 

1C (8:40-10:46), 

Run 2C (11:04-

12:57), Run 3C 

(13:10-15:09)

212

4 Heat Input 11934 Million Btus Run 4, June 21, 

2010 - Includes 

Method 25A Run 

1 (07:40-09:40), 

Run 2 (09:59-

11:59), Run 3 

(12:14-14:14); 

Method 320 

(Fomaldehyde, 

CH4) Run 1 

(07:49-09:50), 

Run 2 (09:59-

12:03), Run 3 

(12:14-14:19)

4 Average Heat Input 1989 MMBtu/hr 2000

4 Steam Output 1410 1000 lb steam/hr 1400

4 Flue Gas Flow Rate 477750 dscfm

4 Sorbent Type and Sorbent Injection Rate (if 

applicable)

35517 lb/hr Lime + Recycle 

Ash

0

4 Flue Gas Oxygen Content 4.4 % 0

4 Flue Gas Carbon Dioxide Content 12.17 % 0

4 Flue Gas Moisture Content 14.04 % 0

4 Flue Gas Sampling Point Temperature 189 Deg F 0

4 Flue Gas Pressure 0.85 atm 0

4 Standard Pressure 2.036 atm 0

4 Standard Temperature 68 Deg F 0

4 Unit Gross Electrical Output 230 MW 235

4 Unit Net Electric Generation 210 MWh 212

Run Name Value UOM Comments

Target

Value

1 SCR (SELECTIVE CATALYTIC 

REDUCTION) - Ammonia Addition Rate

827 lbs/hr

2 SCR (SELECTIVE CATALYTIC 

REDUCTION) - Ammonia Addition Rate

823 lbs/hr

3 SCR (SELECTIVE CATALYTIC 

REDUCTION) - Ammonia Addition Rate

838 lbs/hr

Friday, February 11, 2011 Page 15 of 26
TS Power Plant ICR

8/31/2010

Process Lab Run Data

4 SCR (SELECTIVE CATALYTIC 

REDUCTION) - Ammonia Addition Rate

789 lbs/hr

1 ACTIVATED CARBON ADSORPTION 0.59 lbs/mmcu ft 0.6

2 ACTIVATED CARBON ADSORPTION 0.59 lbs/mmcu ft 0.6

3 ACTIVATED CARBON ADSORPTION 0.59 lbs/mmcu ft 0.6

4 ACTIVATED CARBON ADSORPTION 0.59 lbs/mmcu ft 0.6

1 DRY SCRUBBER - Atomizer slurry flow rate 130 gal/min

2 DRY SCRUBBER - Atomizer slurry flow rate 133 gal/min

3 DRY SCRUBBER - Atomizer slurry flow rate 143 gal/min

4 DRY SCRUBBER - Atomizer slurry flow rate 130.2 gal/min

1 BAGHOUSE DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE 5.4 IN H2O 5

2 BAGHOUSE DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE 5.4 IN H2O 5

3 BAGHOUSE DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE 5.17 IN H2O 5

4 BAGHOUSE DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE 5.29 IN H2O 5

Run Name Value UOM Comments

1 See 4b Comments. 0

Friday, February 11, 2011 Page 16 of 26
TS Power Plant ICR

8/31/2010

Sampling / Stack Data Results Detail

Location Stack Exit - Method 25A

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Fuel Factor

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Analyzer Make

Analyzer Model

Analyzer Serial Number

Operating Range

Operating Units

No. Readings/Avg.

Calibration Set

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post High Cylinder ID

Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift

Cavg

Cavg Units

Cgas

Cgas Units

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Cgasw

Cgasw Units

Friday, February 11, 2011 Page 17 of 26
TS Power Plant ICR

8/31/2010

Location Stack Exit - Method 26A

Average

Run Number 1 2 3

Test Date 6/18/2010 6/19/2010 6/19/2010

Run Start Time 2:49:00 PM 9:22:00 AM 12:42:00 PM

Run Finish Time 6:00:00 PM 12:34:00 PM 3:51:00 PM

Net Traversing Points 40 40 40

Net Run Time, minutes 180 180 180

Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222

Pitot Tube Coefficient 0.834 0.834 0.834 0.834

Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.003 1.003 1.003 1.003

Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 25.21 25.21 25.21 25.210

Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O 1.56 1.63 1.60 1.597

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 144.168 147.247 142.262 144.559

Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 88.08 84.28 88.50 86.953

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 117.908 121.291 116.273 118.491

Total Moisture Liquid collected, g 420.6 425 418.4 421.333

Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 19.80 20.00 19.69 19.830

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 14.38 14.16 14.48 14.340

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 74.50 77.04 77.27 76.270

Dry Mole Fraction 0.8562 0.8584 0.8552 0.857

Carbon Dioxide, % 13.1 13 13.6 13.233

Oxygen, % 6.2 6.6 6.1 6.300

Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 80.7 80.4 80.3 80.467

Fuel Factor 1.12 1.10 1.09

Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 30.34 30.34 30.42 30.367

Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.57 28.59 28.62 28.593

Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -1.2 -1.2 -1.2 -1.200

Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 25.12 25.12 25.12 25.120

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 189.33 190.89 191.03 190.417

Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 1.0308258564

1976

1.079233781

30478

1.060555692

79065

1.057

Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 68.86 70.51 69.87 69.747

Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet 216.642 216.642 216.642 216.642

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 523,193.9 535,819.7 528,863.2 529,292.267

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 895,078.1 916,525.6 908,206.6 906,603.433

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 100.9 101.4 98.4 100.233

Percent Excess Air, % 41.0 45.1 40.4 42.167

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000

Round Duct Diameter, inches 199.3 199.3 199.3

Rectangular Duct Width, inches 0 0 0

Rectangular Duct Length, inches 0 0 0

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Friday, February 11, 2011 Page 18 of 26
TS Power Plant ICR

8/31/2010

Location Stack Exit - Method 29

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Net Traversing Points

Net Run Time, minutes

Nozzle Diameter, inches

Pitot Tube Coefficient

Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor

Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury

Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet

Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf

Total Moisture Liquid collected, g

Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, %

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, %

Dry Mole Fraction

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, %

Fuel Factor

Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole

Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole

Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O

Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F

Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O

Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second

Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, %

Percent Excess Air, %

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Round Duct Diameter, inches

Rectangular Duct Width, inches

Rectangular Duct Length, inches

Fw

Fc

Friday, February 11, 2011 Page 19 of 26
TS Power Plant ICR

8/31/2010

Location Stack Exit - Method 3A CO2

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Fuel Factor

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Analyzer Make

Analyzer Model

Analyzer Serial Number

Operating Range

Operating Units

No. Readings/Avg.

Calibration Set

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post High Cylinder ID

Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift

Cavg

Cavg Units

Cgas

Cgas Units

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Cgasw

Cgasw Units

Friday, February 11, 2011 Page 20 of 26
TS Power Plant ICR

8/31/2010

Location Stack Exit - Method 3A CO2 3

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Fuel Factor

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Analyzer Make

Analyzer Model

Analyzer Serial Number

Operating Range

Operating Units

No. Readings/Avg.

Calibration Set

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post High Cylinder ID

Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift

Cavg

Cavg Units

Cgas

Cgas Units

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Cgasw

Cgasw Units

Friday, February 11, 2011 Page 21 of 26
TS Power Plant ICR

8/31/2010

Location Stack Exit - Method 3A CO2 3 6

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Fuel Factor

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Analyzer Make

Analyzer Model

Analyzer Serial Number

Operating Range

Operating Units

No. Readings/Avg.

Calibration Set

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post High Cylinder ID

Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift

Cavg

Cavg Units

Cgas

Cgas Units

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Cgasw

Cgasw Units

Friday, February 11, 2011 Page 22 of 26
TS Power Plant ICR

8/31/2010

Location Stack Exit - Method 3A O2

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Fuel Factor

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Analyzer Make

Analyzer Model

Analyzer Serial Number

Operating Range

Operating Units

No. Readings/Avg.

Calibration Set

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post High Cylinder ID

Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift

Cavg

Cavg Units

Cgas

Cgas Units

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Cgasw

Cgasw Units

Friday, February 11, 2011 Page 23 of 26
TS Power Plant ICR

8/31/2010

Location Stack Exit - Method 3A O2 3

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Fuel Factor

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Analyzer Make

Analyzer Model

Analyzer Serial Number

Operating Range

Operating Units

No. Readings/Avg.

Calibration Set

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post High Cylinder ID

Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift

Cavg

Cavg Units

Cgas

Cgas Units

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Cgasw

Cgasw Units

Friday, February 11, 2011 Page 24 of 26
TS Power Plant ICR

8/31/2010

Location Stack Exit - Method 3A O2 3 6

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Fuel Factor

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Analyzer Make

Analyzer Model

Analyzer Serial Number

Operating Range

Operating Units

No. Readings/Avg.

Calibration Set

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post High Cylinder ID

Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift

Cavg

Cavg Units

Cgas

Cgas Units

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Cgasw

Cgasw Units

Friday, February 11, 2011 Page 25 of 26
TS Power Plant ICR

8/31/2010

Location Stack Exit - OTM - 27/28

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Net Traversing Points

Net Run Time, minutes

Nozzle Diameter, inches

Pitot Tube Coefficient

Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor

Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury

Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet

Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf

Total Moisture Liquid collected, g

Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, %

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, %

Dry Mole Fraction

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, %

Fuel Factor

Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole

Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole

Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O

Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F

Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O

Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second

Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, %

Percent Excess Air, %

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Round Duct Diameter, inches

Rectangular Duct Width, inches

Rectangular Duct Length, inches

Fw

Fc

Friday, February 11, 2011 Page 26 of 26