alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Revised Summary of Compensation Arrangement - Non-Employee Directors



 Exhibit 10.34 
 REVISED SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENT 
 APPLICABLE TO THE COMPANY’S NON-EMPLOYEE
DIRECTORS 
 As of March 12, 2007, the following represents the compensation program for non-employee directors of NMT Medical, Inc.
(the “Company”) who are not otherwise compensated by the Company: 
  

	 	•	 	 an option to purchase 20,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock (the “Common Stock”) upon initial election and an option to purchase 5,000 shares
(7,000 shares for the Company’s Lead Director) of Common Stock annually thereafter upon re-election at the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders; 


  

	 	•	 	 following each annual meeting of stockholders, each eligible director who served as a member of a committee of the Board of Directors during the preceding fiscal
year is granted an additional option to purchase (i) 2,000 shares of Common Stock if such director served as chairperson of such committee or (ii) 1,000 shares of Common Stock if such director did not serve as chairperson of such
committee; 


  

	 	•	 	 $15,000 ($18,000 for the Company’s Lead Director) per year for their services as directors; 


  

	 	•	 	 $2,000 ($2,500 for the Company’s Lead Director) for each meeting of the Board of Directors that they attend in person; 


  

	 	•	 	 $1,000 ($1,250 for the Company’s Lead Director) for each telephonic meeting of the Board of Directors that they participate in; 



 

	 	•	 	 $1,000 ($1,500 for each committee chairperson) for each board committee meeting that they attend in person; 


  

	 	•	 	 $500 ($750 for each committee chairperson) for each telephonic board committee meeting that they participate in; and 


  

	 	•	 	 expense reimbursement for attending Board of Directors and board committee meetings.
§ 78.109 Major and minor modifications to stations. ( a ) Amendments to applications and modifications to stations are classified as major or minor. A major modification requires a formal application. A major amendment to an application is treated as a new application.
( b ) Major modifications to a station or amendments to an application include, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) Any increase in bandwidth;
( 2 ) Any change in the transmitting antenna system of a station, other than a CARS pickup station, including the direction of the main radiation lobe, directive pattern, antenna gain or transmission line, antenna height or location;
( 3 ) Any change in the type of modulation;
( 4 ) Any change in the location of a station transmitter, other than a CARS pickup station transmitter, except a move within the same building or upon the tower or mast or a change in the area of operation of a CARS pickup station;
( 5 ) Any change in frequency assignment, including polarization;
( 6 ) Any increase in authorized operating power;
( 7 ) Any substantial change in ownership or control;
( 8 ) Any addition or change in frequency, excluding removing a frequency;
( 9 ) Any modification or amendment requiring an environmental assessment (as governed by §§ 1.1301 through 1319 of this chapter, including changes affecting historic preservation under § 1.1307(a)(4) of this chapter and 16 U.S.C. 470 (National Historic Preservation Act));
( 10 ) Any request requiring frequency coordination; or
( 11 ) Any modification or amendment requiring notification to the Federal Aviation Administration as defined in 47 CFR 17, subpart B.
( c ) Minor changes may be made at the discretion of the licensee, provided proper notice is given to the Commission within 30 days of implementing the change and provided further, that the changes are appropriately reflected in the next application for renewal of the license for the station.
( d ) For applications and modifications, the following changes are considered minor: ( 1 ) Any name change not involving change in ownership or control of the license;
( 2 ) Any change to administrative information, e.g., address, telephone number, or contact person;
( 3 ) Any change in ownership that does not affect the identity or controlling interest of the licensee;
( 4 ) Lowering power;
( 5 ) Removing one or more channels; or
( 6 ) Deleting a path.
[68 FR 27004, May 19, 2003]
Exhibit 21.1

LOGO

Subsidiaries of American Wagering, Inc. (AWI):



|                                                                                 |  |                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|Name                                                                             |  | State of Incorporation or Organization
|Computerized Bookmaking Systems, Inc. (CBS; a wholly owned subsidiary of AWI)  |  | Nevada                                
|                                                                                 | 
|Contest Sports Systems, Inc. (CSS; a wholly owned subsidiary of CBS)           |  | Nevada                                
|                                                                                 | 
|Leroys Horse & Sports Place, Inc. (Leroys; a wholly owned subsidiary of AWI) |  | Nevada                                
|                                                                                 | 
|AWI Manufacturing, Inc. (AWIM; a wholly owned subsidiary of AWI)               |  | Nevada                                
|                                                                                 | 
|AWI Gaming, Inc. (AWIG; a wholly owned subsidiary of AWI)                      |  | Nevada                                
|                                                                                 | 
|Sturgeons, LLC (Sturgeons; a wholly owned subsidiary of AWIG)                |  | Nevada
#### Winfield S. Atwood et al. v. Mary A. Atwood.

Filed May 22, 1895.

No. 5992.

Partition: Final Order: Review. In the petition of a widow the prayer was for judgment confirming her share in, and the partition of, certain real estate owned by her deceased husband, and that if division of such lands could not be made in kind between herself and his four children, a sale should be ordered and the proceeds thereof divided according to the respective *202rights of the parties. A demurrer having been sustained to an answer, the record merely thereafter reciting “judgment of a partition as prayed for in the petition," is *held*not to disclose a final judgment.

Error from the district court of Hitchcock county. Tried below before Welty, J.

*Pound & Burr*and *L. H. Blackledge,*for plaintiffs in error.

*J. W. Cole, contra.*

Ryan, C.

This action for petition was brought by the defendant in error in the district court of Hitchcock county against the plaintiffs in error, who, as children of the deceased husband of the defendant in error, were alleged to hold undivided shares in the real estate of which their father died seized. There was filed a demurrer to an answer to this petition, which was sustained, whereupon the record recites there was “judgment of partition as prayed for in the petition.” As the above quoted language was all that by any construction could be claimed to amount to a final judgment, it is important to consider what in fact was the prayer of the petition therein contemplated. It .was as follows: “ This plaintiff therefore prays that judgment may be entered confirming her share of said estate, as set forth in the foregoing petition, and that partition of said described lands may be had according to the respective rights of the parties interested therein, or, if the same cannot be equitably divided, that said premises may be sold and the proceeds thereof divided between the parties according to their respective rights, and that plaintiff may have all other proper and equitable relief.” The order of “judgment as prayed for in the petition” left still undetermined what were the rights of the respective parties, *203and whether or not a division could be made without a sale of the entire property, and until the settlement of these questions, at least, it could not be claimed that there had been rendered a final judgment. This error proceeding is therefore

Dismissed.
**STEAM ELECTRIC**

**DUMMY R** **E P**  **L AC**  **E M**  **E NT**  **P A**  **G E**  **EPA -**  **HQ -**  **OW -**  **20 09**  **- 0819**  **DCN: SE04574A1**  **THIS IS A DATABASE IT WILL BE FEDEX TO THE DOCKET**
#### NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. ATLANTA JOURNAL CO.

No. 13322.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 13, 1951.

*14William M. Pate, Ch. Law Officer, NLRB, Atlanta, Ga., David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Cnsl. NLRB, A. Norman Som-ers, Asst. Gen. Cnsl. NLRB, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

E. D. Smith, Jr., Ernest P. Rogers, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent.

Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and McCORD and BORAH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This trumpery little case is a tempest in a tea pot, and, because the tea has been so long in brewing, it is bound to be bitter tea for whoever has to drink it.

It is no credit to any of the participants that the proceedings, beginning with the certification in 1944, have dragged their slow length along to such little purpose in achieving the industrial peace spoken of in the Act.

It is both a wonder and a pity that, with the few persons involved in this small group of supposedly educated and intelligent employees, some reasonably satisfactory settlement and adjustment could not have been arrived at long ago, without all of this backing and filling and, in the end, doing nothing.

If we could do so, we would order this trivial proceeding dismissed as completely stale, flat, and unprofitable, and one with which we wanted nothing to do. We do not, however, write, we only apply, the law as it has been written.

So applying it, we hold unfounded: (1) respondent’s complaint of the amended charges as not within the scope of the charge as originally filed; and (2) its complaint that the findings on which the order rests are without adequate support in the evidence.

In view, however, of the long lapse of time since the last certification, the decree granting enforcement must carry a provision to the effect that respondent, while obligated to bargain with the union “as the representative of its employees until the fact that it is not, is made to appear”, has the right to have determined by an election or other satisfactory method whether in fact the union is such and to act upon that determination.

Petition granted and enforcement decree, as suggested, authorized.
148P16

#### State v. John Wesley Hearne

Defs *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Order of COA (COAP16-163)

Dismissed
§ 64.705 Restrictions on charges related to the provision of operator services. ( a ) A provider of operator services shall: ( 1 ) Not bill for unanswered telephone calls in areas where equal access is available;
( 2 ) Not knowingly bill for unanswered telephone calls where equal access is not available;
( 3 ) Not engage in call splashing, unless the consumer requests to be transferred to another provider of operator services, the consumer is informed prior to incurring any charges that the rates for the call may not reflect the rates from the actual originating location of the call, and the consumer then consents to be transferred;
( 4 ) Except as provided in paragraph (a)(3) of this section, not bill for a call that does not reflect the location of the origination of the call; and
( 5 ) Ensure, by contract or tariff, that each aggregator for which such provider is the presubscribed provider of operator services is in compliance with the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) An aggregator shall ensure that no charge by the aggregator to the consumer for using an “800” or “950” access code number, or any other access code number, is greater than the amount the aggregator charges for calls placed using the presubscribed provider of operator services.
( c ) The requirements of paragraphs (a)(5) and (b) of this section shall not apply to CMRS aggregators and providers of CMRS operator services.
[56 FR 18523, Apr. 23, 1991, as amended at 63 FR 43041, Aug. 11, 1998]
# Curriculum Summit 

/ Published March 31, 2023
March 29, 2023, 
On 29 March 2023, CIC hosted its first post-pandemic Curriculum Summit. Over 30 stakeholders participated, including representation from the interagency, alumni, private sector, and across the DoD. The gathering was focused on the new Cyber Leadership Development Program (LDP), scheduled to be offered in the upcoming fall 2023 semester. Col. Ken Miller is serving as Director of the Cyber LDP and utilized this opportunity to further develop the program to ensure it will meet stakeholder needs. The program will follow the existing model provided by the CIO LDP as an intensive, prestigious, 14-week, on-site, full-time, cohort based, graduate certificate awarding program. More information about the program will be published on the CIC website, cic.ndu.edu.
PUBLIC LAW 112–157—AUG. 10, 2012 126 STAT. 1213 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1560: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 112–222 (Comm. on Natural Resources). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 157 (2011): Dec. 5, 7, considered and passed House. 

Vol. 158 (2012): Aug. 1, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 112–157 

112th Congress 

An Act 

To amend the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama and Coushatta Indian Tribes 

of Texas Restoration Act to allow the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo Tribe to determine 

blood quantum requirement for membership in that tribe. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. BLOOD QUANTUM REQUIREMENT DETERMINED BY TRIBE. 

Section 108(a)(2) of the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama 

and Coushatta Indian Tribes of Texas Restoration Act (25 U.S.C. 

1300g–7(a)(2)) is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(2) any person of Tigua Ysleta del Sur Pueblo Indian 

blood enrolled by the tribe.’’. 

Approved August 10, 2012. 

Aug. 10, 2012 

[H.R. 1560] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
§ 54.633 Validity of electronic signatures and records. ( a ) For the purposes of this subpart, an electronic signature (defined by the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act, as an electronic sound, symbol, or process, attached to or logically associated with a contract or other record and executed or adopted by a person with the intent to sign the record) has the same legal effect as a written signature.
( b ) For the purposes of this subpart, an electronic record (defined by the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act, as a contract or other record created, generated, sent, communicated, received, or stored by electronic means) constitutes a record.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Judges - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"T29Cfw0Yoi\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/the-court\/judges\/\">Judges<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/the-court\/judges\/embed\/#?secret=T29Cfw0Yoi\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Judges” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"T29Cfw0Yoi\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"The judges of the court are appointed by the President, with the advice and consent of the Senate.\u202f Judges are appointed to the court for life under Article III of the Constitution of the United States.\u202f By statute, there are twelve judges in active service. When eligible, judges may elect to take senior status, which […]"}
§ 69.703 Definitions. For purposes of this subpart: ( a ) *Channel terminations.* ( 1 ) A channel termination between an IXC POP and a serving wire center is a dedicated channel connecting an IXC POP and a serving wire center, offered for purposes of carrying special access traffic.
( 2 ) A channel termination between a LEC end office and a customer premises is a dedicated channel connecting a LEC end office and a customer premises, offered for purposes of carrying special access traffic.
( b ) *Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA).* This term shall have the definition provided in § 22.909(a) of this chapter.
( c ) *Interexchange Carrier Point of Presence (IXC POP).* The point of interconnection between an interexchange carrier's network and a local exchange carrier's network.
( d ) *Wire center.* For purposes of this subpart, the term “wire center” shall refer to any location at which an incumbent LEC is required to provide expanded interconnection for special access pursuant to § 64.1401(a) of this chapter, and any location at which an incumbent LEC is required to provide expanded interconnection for switched transport pursuant to § 64.1401(b)(1) of this chapter.
( e ) *Study area.* A common carrier's entire service area within a state.
Exhibit
      32.2








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**




**THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b)**




**OF
      SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)**







Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of
      Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Gregory L.
      Cauthen, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Transocean Inc.,
      a
      Cayman Islands company (the “Company”), hereby certify, to my knowledge,
      that:





(1)
            the
                Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
                30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section
                13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            information
                contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
                the
                financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





Dated:  October
                31, 2007
            
            /s/
                Gregory L. CauthenName:
            Gregory
                L. CauthenSenior
                Vice President andChief
                Financial Officer





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
      63
      of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report
      or
      as a separate disclosure document.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Transocean Inc. and will be retained by Transocean Inc. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
First Amendment ot Employment Agreement-Hedges


    Exhibit
      10.3

    


    


    FIRST
      AMENDMENT TO 

    EMPLOYMENT
      AGREEMENT OF

    JOHN
      W. HEDGES

    


    This
      First Amendment to the Employment Agreement is made and entered into on March
      6,
      2006, by and between First Mid-Illinois Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”), a
      corporation with its principal place of business located in Mattoon, Illinois,
      and John W. Hedges (the “Executive”).

    


    WHEREAS,
      the
      Company and the Executive are parties to an Employment Agreement dated as of
      October 1, 2005 (the “Employment Agreement”) and now desire to amend the
      Employment Agreement to comply
      with Internal Revenue Code Section 409A and the guidance and regulations
      thereunder, to the extent applicable. 

     

    NOW,
      THEREFORE,
      in
      consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, and other
      good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
      acknowledged, the parties agree to amend the Employment Agreement as follows,
      effective as of January 1, 2005:

    


    1.
      By
      amending the second sentence of Section 4.02(a) to read as follows:

    “(a) Such
      amount shall be paid in a lump sum payment as soon as practicable following
      the
      date of such termination.” 

    


    2.           
      2. By adding a final sentence to Section 4.02 to read as follows: 

    “If
      at
      the time of such termination of employment Executive is a “Key Employee” as
      defined in Section 416(i) of the Internal Revenue Code (without reference to
      paragraph 5 thereof), and the amounts payable to Executive pursuant to Section
      4.02(a) and (b) are subject to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code,
      payment of such amounts shall not commence until six months following
      Executive’s termination of employment, with the first payment to include the
      payments that otherwise would have been made during such six-month period.”


    


    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF,
      the
      parties have executed this First Amendment to the Employment Agreement on the
      6th day of March, 2006.

    


    


    FIRST
      MID-ILLINOIS BANCSHARES, INC.

    


    By: /s/
      William S. Rowland 

    Its: Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer 

     

     

    JOHN
      W. HEDGES

     

    /s/
      John
      W. Hedges
#### § 64.1603 Customer notification.

Any common carrier participating in the offering of services providing calling party number, ANI, or charge number on interstate calls must notify its subscribers, individually or in conjunction with other carriers, that their telephone numbers may be identified to a called party. Such notification must be made not later than December 1, 1995, and at such times thereafter as to ensure notice to subscribers. The notification must be effective in informing subscribers how to maintain privacy by dialing *67 (or 1167 for rotary or pulse-dialing phones) on interstate calls. The notice shall inform subscribers whether dialing *82 (or 1182 for rotary or pulse-dialing phones) on interstate calls is necessary to present calling party number to called parties. For ANI or charge number services for which such privacy is not provided, the notification shall inform subscribers of the restrictions on the reuse or sale of subscriber information.

[60 FR 29491, June 5, 1995; 60 FR 54449, Oct. 24, 1995]