alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
P. 1


# OAR Box 1875 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



## Document

Number: 

# 24 ) ll-E-4 2 Docket Number: 

# A-90-1 9

Printed 12/1/200811:12:45AM

Sheet 24 of 86P. 2 

# A-90-1 9 ll-E-4 2 DATE : May4 , 199 2 SUBJECT : Hazardou s Organi c NESHA P (HON ) Meetin g wit h Stat e

Representative s Th e followin g EP

Apersonne l participate d i n a teleconferenc e o n th e HONwit h member s o f th e Nationa l Governor s Association' s Ai r Implementatio n Tas k Force : Ja n Meyer , Standard s Developmen t Branch ; an

d Jef f Clark , Offic e o f th e Director , Offic e o f Ai r Qualit yPlannin g an d Standards . Attache d i s a n agend a fo r th e teleconference . Alis t o f member s o f th e Ai r Implementatio n Tas k Forc e i s als o attached . Attachments : fr - 

# TiUJ r 

# ^ ! 

# i i W 

## DE C I 8 

## 1992

\j\^'- • i

mgmll.memos.de tP. 3



## [RNOR S 

## ;I/OIO N Joh n Ashcrnt t Governo ro t Missour i Chairma n Ro yRome r Governo ro f Colorad o Vic e Chairma n Ravmon d C
. Scheppac h Executiv e Directo r Hal l ofth cState s 44 4 Nort h Capito l Stree t Washington
. 1 5 C
. :utio|.|< " Telephon e < Jt.'J i is,;4.> in n 

# + + * +

CONFERENC E CAL L AGEND A Stat e Environmenta l Commissioners ' Ai r Implementatio

nTas k Forc e CAL L WIT H EP

A Monday , Ma

y 4 , 1992 , 2:0 0 p.m . ES T Conferenc e Line : 202/260-697 2

• Rul e fo r Enhance d Inspectio n an d Maintenance : acceptabl e performanc e standar d language .

• Earl yToxi c Reductions : stat e concern s abou t delegation .

• Hazardou s Organi c NESHA P (HON) : stat e concern s abou t emission s averaging .P. 4 

### P. 3

Sfcufc a CowmiBBloner s o nth e Ai r Implementatio nTae k Forc e KenAlkema , Executiv e Direator , Uta

hDepartment o

f Environmenta l Quality Jame s Boy

d (fo r Ja nSharpless) , Executiv e Director , Californi a Ai r Resource s Boar d Mar k Coleman , Deput

y Commissioner , Oklahom a Stat e Department of Health DanGreenbaum , Commissioner Massachusett s Department of Environmenta l Protectio

n To m Looby , Director , Offic e of Environment , Colorad o Departmen t of Health Bhara t Mathur (fo r Mar y Gade) , Manager , Ai r Pollutio nContro l Division , Illinoi s Environmenta l Protection , Agenc y Bo bPerciasepe , Secretary , Marylan d Department of th

e Environmen t Lewi s Shaw , Deputy Commissioner , Environmenta l Quality Control , SouthCarolin a Departmen t o f Healt han d Environmenta l Contro l Scot t Weiner , Commissioner , Ne w Jerse y Department of Environmen t an d Energ y
STAPP A Participan t on Ai r Implementatio nT*«k Parco' e BO

M Wor k Grou

p Ta d Aburn , Progra

m Administrator , Ai r Managemen t Administration , Marylan d Departmen t o f th

e Environment Kare nOlson , Sectio

nChief . FTATS , Texa s Ai r Contro l Boar d Bil l 0'Sullivan , Administrator , Offic e of Energy , Ne w Jerse y Department of Environmenta l Protectio nan d Energ y Donal d Theiler , Director , Ai r -Managemen t Bureau , Wisconsi nDepartment o f Natura l Resourc e
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NetFabric Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Vasan
Thatham, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

May 22, 2006

/s/ Vasan Thatham
---------------------------------
Name: Vasan Thatham
Title: Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to NetFabric Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by NetFabric Holdings,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
§ 90.1338 Grandfathered operation and transition to Citizens Broadband Radio Service. ( a ) Fixed and base station registrations filed in ULS on or before April 17, 2015 that are constructed, in service, and fully compliant with the rules in part 90, subpart Z as of April 17, 2016 will be afforded protection from harmful interference caused by Citizens Broadband Radio Service users until the end of their license term (with one exception that fixed and base stations registered under licenses issued after January 8, 2013 will only be afforded protection until April 17, 2020), consistent with § 90.1307. Protection criteria for such registered base stations are described in § 96.21of this chapter. Registrations originally filed after April 17, 2015 will only be afforded protection from harmful interference under this section within the licensee's Grandfathered Wireless Protection Zone, as defined in §§ 96.3 and 96.21 of this chapter.
( b ) Existing licensees as of April 17, 2015 may add new mobile or portable stations (as defined in § 90.1333) and/or add new subscriber units that operate above the power limit defined in § 90.1333, only if they can positively receive and decode an enabling signal from a base station. Such units will be afforded protection within the licensee's Grandfathered Wireless Protection Zone (as defined in §§ 96.3 and 96.21 of this chapter) until April 17, 2020 or until the end of their license term, whichever is later (with one exception that mobile and portable stations associated with licenses issued after January 8, 2013 will only be afforded protection until April 17, 2020).
[80 FR 36222, June 23, 2015]
Editorial Note on Part 36
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 74 FR 23956, May 22, 2009, 77 FR 30411, May 23, 2012, 82 FR 25538, June 2, 2017, and corrected at 83 FR 4153, Jan. 30, 2018. Nomenclature changes to part 36 also appear at 83 FR 63587, Dec. 11, 2018, and 84 FR 4360, Feb. 15, 2019.

§ 36.311 Network Support/General Support Expenses—Accounts 6110 and 6120. ( a ) Network Support Expenses are expenses associated with motor vehicles, aircraft, special purpose vehicles, garage work equipment, and other work equipment. General Support Expenses are expenses associated with land and buildings, furniture and artworks, office equipment, and general purpose computers.
( b ) The expenses in these account are apportioned among the operations on the basis of the separation of account 2110, Land and Support Assets.
No. 11-6080.

#### Scott *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### O. L. HOYT *v.*WILBUR CHRISTIE and Trustee.

*Trustee Process Summoning Administrator.*

An administrator holding money, proceeds of a settled estate, is chargeable as trustee of one entitled thereto in distribution of such proceeds, on trustee process summoning him in his personal and not in his representative capacity.

This was an action begun by trustee process. A commissioner, was appointed, and he reported that at the time of the service of the process, the trustee, who was administrator of the estate of Mary Christie, the defendant’s mother, had in his hands the sum of $58, the defendant’s share in said estate, and that he had nothing else, and was under no other liability to the defendant. The trustee was summoned in his individual capacity and not as administrator, and the defendant and trustee claimed that for that reason the trustee was not liable.

At the September Term, 1877, the court, Redfield, J., presiding, rendered judgment, *pro forma,*that the trustee was chargeable ; to which the trustee excepted.

*Ruse f Lord,*for the trustee.

The trustee should have been súmmoned in his representative capacity. Gen. Sts. c. 34, s. 3 ; *Scofield*v. *White,*29 Yt. 330 ; *Loverly*v. *Braynard,*28 Yt, 738 ; *Lamson*v. *Bradley,*42 Yt. 165, 174 ; *Knapp*v. *Levanway,*27 Yt. 298 ; *Exr. of Tillinghast*v. *Johnson,*5 Ala. 514.

*O. L. Royt, pro se.*

' The process may be maintained against a trustee in his individual capacity. Gen. Sts. c. 34, ss. 2, 3 ; *Short*v. *Sampson,*10 *49Yt. 446 ; *Parks*v. Hadley, 9 Yt. 820 ; Gen. Sts. c. 57, s. 4; *Admr. of Tryon*v. Tryon, 16 Yt. 818 ; *Adams*v. *Adams,*16 Yt. 228 ; *Stone*v. *Griffin,*3 Vt. 400; *Burnell*v. *Malony,*36 Yt. 636 ; *Roberts*v. *Morgan,*30 Yt. 319.

The opinion of the court was delivered by-

Ross, J.

The only objection to the judgment of the County Court holding the trustee chargeable is, that the trustee was summoned in his individual capacity and not as the administrator of Mary Christie’s estate. Whether this objection can prevail depends upon whether the defendant, on the facts reported, could have maintained a suit against the trustee in his individual capacity for the amount in his hands. He had in his hands as the avails of the estate of which he was administrator the share of the defendant in money when the writ was served upon him and when his disclosure was taken. No question is made but that the estate was fully settled, and the share of the defendant therein fully determined. On such determination and settlement the money which constituted the defendant’s share ceased to be the money of the estate, and became the money of the defendant. The defendant therefore could have maintained an action against the trustee in his individual capacity for its recovery. Hence the plaintiff, who by the trustee process succeeds to the rights of the defendant in this respect, may maintain this process against and charge the trustee in his individual capacity. There was no error in the judgment of the County Court, and the same is affirmed.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

LASZLO HATSCHEK

, Appellant,

v.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., THE INVERRARY ASSOCIATION, INC.,

ISLES OF INVERRARY CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., CACH,

LLC, and PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC

, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 16

- 3702

[ November 30, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Barry J. Stone , Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE15017784

.

Laszlo Hatschek, Lauderhill, pro se.

Todd C. Drosky of Frenkel Lambert Weiss Weisman & Gordon, LLP,

Fort Lauderdale, for appellee Bank of America, N.A

.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER

, T AYLOR and D AMOORGIAN

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**EXHIBIT 31(b)**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT**

**        TO RULE 13a-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF**

**2002**

I, Cherry Cai, chief financial officer of Hendrx Corp. (“Registrant”) certify that: 

1.     I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (“Report”) of Registrant; 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report; 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this Report; 

4.     I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: 

a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared; 

b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and 

c)     Disclosed in this Report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.     I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

Date: November 10, 2006 

/s/ Cherry Cai

Cherry Cai 

Chief Financial Officer 

**38**

----
#### § 78.3 Other pertinent rules.

Other pertinent provisions of the Commission's rules and regulations relating to the cable television relay service (CARS) are included in the following parts of this chapter:

Part 0—Commission Organization.

Part 1—Practice and Procedure.

Part 2—Frequency Allocations and Radio Treaty Matters; General Rules and Regulations.

Part 17—Construction Marking and Lighting of Antenna Structures.

Part 21—Domestic Public Fixed Radio Services.

Part 74—Experimental, Auxiliary, and Special Broadcast, and Other Program Distribution Services.

Part 76—Cable Television Service.

Part 101—Fixed Microwave Services.

[55 FR 46014, Oct. 31, 1990, as amended at 65 FR 38326, June 20, 2000]
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350,

As Adopted
Pursuant

Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Matrix Service Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30,
2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John R. Hewitt, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Date: September 8, 2011              
|                                     
|/S/    John R.
Hewitt                
|John R. Hewitt                       
|President and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

      In connection with the periodic report of Connetics Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Thomas G. Wiggans,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the
date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the
United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

Date: December 2, 2003                  /s/ Thomas G. Wiggans
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Thomas G. Wiggans
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Joseph A. HEDIGER, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America.

No. 14312.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

Feb. 6, 1951.

Ben F. Turner, St. Louis, Mo., for appellant.

Ed Dupree, General Counsel, Office of the Housing Expediter, Leon J. Libeu, Assistant General Counsel, Office of the Housing Expediter, and Benjamin Freid-son, Special Litigation Attorney, Office of the Housing Expediter, all of Washington, D. C., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court docketed and dismissed for want of prosecution, on motion of appellee.
EXHIBIT 23.2

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

         We  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the  Registration
Statements  on Form S-8 (Nos.  333-17393,  333-40823 and  333-40825,  333-57231,
333-64429,  333-68159 and  333-87761) of our report dated February 15, 1999 with
respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements  and schedule of Engineering
Animation,  Inc.  included in its Annual  Report  (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1999, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

                                 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
April 11, 2000
§ 73.1725 Limited time. ( a ) Operation is applicable only to Class B (secondary) AM stations on a clear channel with facilities authorized before November 30, 1959. Operation of the secondary station is permitted during daytime and until local sunset if located west of the Class A station on the channel, or until local sunset at the Class A station if located east of that station. Operation is also permitted during nighttime hours not used by the Class A station or other stations on the channel.
( b ) No authorization will be granted for: ( 1 ) A new limited time station;
( 2 ) A limited time station operating on a changed frequency;
( 3 ) A limited time station with a new transmitter site materially closer to the 0.1 mV/m contour of a co-channel U.S. Class A station; or
( 4 ) Modification of the operating facilities of a limited time station resulting in increased radiation toward any point on the 0.1 mV/m contour of a co-channel U.S. Class A station during the hours after local sunset in which the limited time station is permitted to operate by reason of location east of the Class A station.
( c ) The licensee of a secondary station which is authorized to operate limited time and which may resume operation at the time the Class A station (or stations) on the same channel ceases operation shall, with each application for renewal of license, file in triplicate a copy of its regular operating schedule. It shall bear a signed notation by the licensee of the Class A station of its objection or lack of objection thereto. Upon approval of such operating schedule, the FCC will affix its file mark and return one copy to the licensee authorized to operate limited time. Such approved operating schedule shall be considered part of the station's license. Departure from said operating schedule will be permitted only pursuant to § 73.1715 (Share time).
[56 FR 64872, Dec. 12, 1991, as amended at 84 FR 2758, Feb. 8, 2019]
September 18, 2015

Mr. Nicholas Macray Fuller 

Above All Video LLC

219B West Atlantic Boulevard

Atlantic Beach, NC 28512

Dear Mr. Fuller:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

§§ 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.119, 91.121, 91.151(a), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 

91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations 

(14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the 

next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We received your April 25, 2015, exemption request on behalf of Above All Video LLC filed 

in Docket No. FAA−2015−1548, but we are unable to process your request any further. Your 

petition does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider 

the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
3