alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Massachusett s Institut e o f Technolog y Environment , Healt h & Safet y Offic e Environmenta l Program s Offic e
Jun e 30 , 200 4 7 7 Massachusett s Avenu e Cambridge , Massachusett s 02139-430 7 Phon e Fa x 617.452.347 7

61 7 258.683 1 VI A HAN D DELIVER Y Mr
. Rober

t T
. Donaldson Associat e Directo r Busines s Compliance Divisio n Burea u o f Wast e Preventio n Departmen

t o f Environmenta

l Protectio n On e Winter Street , Eight

h Floo r Boston , Massachusett

s 0210 8 Re : Comment

s o n Propose

d Addition s an

d Revision s t o the Commonwealth' s Ai r Pollutio n Contro l Regulation s Dea r Mr
. Donaldson , Th e Massachusett

s Institute o f

Technolog

y ("MIT" ) submit

s th e followin g comment

s i n regar d t o the Massachusett

s Departmen

t o f Environmenta

l Protection' s ("DEP" ) proposed amendment

s t o the Commonwealth' s Ai r Pollutio n Contro l Regulations , 31 0 CM R7.0 0 e t sea. : MI T understands that , i f

implemented , th

e propose d regulation s woul d requir e bot h existin g an

d ne w emergenc

y engines t o bur

n Ultr aLo w Sulfu r

Diese l (ULSD ) whe

n suc h fue l become s availabl e i n 2006
. DE

P suggest s tha t the increase

d cost s fo r burnin g liqui d fue l wil l b e minima l becaus e th e cost s wil l increase by 4 t o 5 cent s pe r gallo n an d diese l engin e emergenc

y unit s ar e limite d t o 30

0 hour s pe r yea r operation
. However , the DEP' s proposed regulator y change s an d preambl e fai l t o recogniz

e tha t emergenc y generators an

d othe r facility equipment, suc h a s existin g combustion turbine s an d boiler s (whic h appea

r t o be exemp

t fromth e propose d fue l requirements ) ofte n shar e fue l tanks (i n othe

r words , bot

h the emergenc

y generator

s an d othe r facilit y equipmen

t dra w fue l fromth

e sam e tank)
. Specifically , a

t MIT' s the powe

r plant , th e sam e liqui d fue l tanks suppl

y a n emergenc

y generator , th

e combustion turbine , an

d aboiler
. I f MI T i s require d t o bur

n ULS D i n thi s emergenc

y generator, i t

wil l b e require d t o eithe

r (1 ) install , a t asignifican

t cost , ane w fue l storag

e tan k dedicate d t o fue l th

e emergenc

y generator, or (2 ) us e ULS D t o fue l the powe r plant' s combustion turbin e an d the boiler , a

t a n estimate d increase d cost o f severa l hundre d thousan d dollar s annually
. MI T request

s tha t DE P reconside

r th e significan

t cost s associate

d wit h thes e propose

d regulations
. MI T suggest s tha t DE P excep t fromthe propose

d regulation s suc

h existin g emergenc y engines tha

t dra w fue l fromth

e sam e storage tan

k tha t fuel s engines o r

turbine s tha

t ar e exemp t fromthe propose

d fue l regulations
. 

### ^Wtinwe m o f Massachusett

s 

### JU N 3 0 200 4

Respectfully Submitted, j ZhaTMaDavidovi,z ^/O/OSf ® Mlhec/ o
Exhibit 31.1



RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION



I, Gary Borglund, certify that:



1.         I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Ecash, Inc.;



2.         Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

l

3.         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.         I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [omitted pursuant to extended compliance period] for the small business issuer and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)  [omitted pursuant to extended compliance period]



(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5.       I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.





Dated: August 24, 2006





Gary Borglund

Gary Borglund, Principal Executive Officer

and Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Wayne R. Lieberman, certify that:

1. I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Staktek Holdings, Inc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fourth quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the Audit Committee of the Companys Board of Directors:

(a) All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                    |  |            |  |                                      
|------------------- |  | ---------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: March 7, 2007 |  | Signature: |  | /s/    WAYNE R.
LIEBERMAN            
|                    |  |            |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
# Faculty Discusses Cyber Intel at DIA Analytic Workshop

/ Published Nov. 24, 2014

iCollege Cyber Intelligence course manager David J. Di Tallo (CDR, USN) recently discussed the college's newest offering in the NDU iCollege Cyber Leadership program at the Defense Intelligence Agency's November 6, 2014 "Five Eyes Analytic Training Workshop" in Arlington, VA.  Professor Di Tallo discussed his course and how it prepares cyber leaders to make strategic decisions as both enablers and consumers of cyber intelligence.  Here is an excerpt from the article:  CDR Di Tallo from National Defense University, focused on presenting Cyber Intelligence as part of a broader intelligence enterprise, relating Cyber Intelligence to other disciplines found in the intel community. He argued that “Cyber Intelligence is no different than any other intelligence discipline” and noted that it, “it accomplishes the two main goals of intelligence, it helps inform decision makers and avoid strategic surprise”. CDR Di Tallo further referenced the Cyber Intelligence definition from the DNI’s Strategy, and emphasized its use for strategic level policy makers. In response to an audience question on whether to take IT personnel and train them in analytics or take analysts and train them in cyber/IT, CDR Di Tallo responded that it was more efficient to have a mixture of both. This issue was debated throughout the workshop, with Dr. Reid positing an anecdotal remark that NSA had better success training analysts in a cyber-skillset.  Click here for the complete story:  http://www.insaonline.org/i/d/f/i/cyberintel4.aspx.

UPCOMING COURSE -
#### § 95.2769 [Reserved]
§ 80.1183 Remote control for maneuvering or navigation. ( a ) An on-board station may be used for remote control of maneuvering or navigation control systems aboard the same ship or, where that ship is towing a second ship, aboard the towed ship.
( b ) The remote control system transmissions must contain a synchronization signal and a message signal composed of a documentation number group, a company control group, an actuation instruction group, and a termination of transmission group. ( 1 ) The synchronization signal must be the control character “SYN”, transmitted twice.
( 2 ) The message signal is composed of the following groups: ( i ) The documentation number group must be transmitted once and be the ship's U.S. Coast Guard documentation number or, if the ship is not documented, the call sign of the on-board station.
( ii ) The company control group, composed of three letters taken from AAA through ZZZ, which must be transmitted one time. (iiii) The actuation instruction group, composed of two letters taken from AA through ZZ, which must be transmitted one time.
( iv ) The termination of transmission group, composed of the control character “EM”, which must be transmitted twice.
( c ) The receiving system must: ( 1 ) Reject any actuation instruction until it recognizes and accepts the company control group.
( 2 ) Reject any company control group until it recognizes and accepts the documentation number group.
( d ) The emission employed must be G2D. The provisions applicable to G3E emission are also applicable to G2D emission.
( e ) The binary information must be applied to the carrier as frequency-shift keying (FSK) of the standard tones 1070 and 1270 Hz. “0” (low) must correspond to 1070 Hz and “1” (high) must correspond to 1270 Hz. The signalling rate must be 300 bits per second.
( f ) The alphabet employed must be the United States of America Standard Code for Information Interchange (USASCII), contained in the United States of America Standards Institute publication USAS X3.4-1968. ( 1 ) The bit sequence must be least significant bit first to most significant bit (bit 1 through 7), consecutively.
( 2 ) The character structure must consist of 8 bits (seven bits plus one character parity bit) having equal time intervals.
( 3 ) “Odd” parity is required.
#### § 76.1608 System technical integration requiring uniform election of must-carry or retransmission consent status.

A cable system that changes its technical configuration in such a way as to integrate two formerly separate cable systems must give 90 days notice of its intention to do so to any television broadcast stations that have elected must-carry status with respect to one system and retransmission consent status with respect to the other. After July 31, 2020, such notice shall be delivered to stations electronically in accordance with § 76.1600. If the system and the station do not agree on a uniform election 45 days prior to integration, the cable system may require the station to make such a uniform election 30 days prior to integration.

[85 FR 16006, Mar. 20, 2020]
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
 PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Interactive Intelligence, Inc. (the
“Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Stephen R. Head, Chief Financial Officer, Vice President of
Finance and Administration, Secretary and Treasurer of the Registrant, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2,
      fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and
 
 (2)
              The information contained in
      the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.
 
 
 /s/ Stephen R.
Head
 Stephen
R. Head
 Chief
Financial Officer, Vice President of Finance and Administration,
 Secretary
and Treasurer
 (Principal
Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
 August 8,
2008
§ 67.3 Incorporation by Reference. ( a ) Certain material is incorporated by reference into this part with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved incorporation by reference (IBR) material is available for inspection at the FCC and the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). Contact the FCC through the Federal Communications Commission's Reference Information Center, phone: (202) 418-0270. For information on the availability of this material at NARA, visit *www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html* or email *fr.inspection@nara.gov .* The material may be obtained from the source in the following paragraph of this section.
( b ) Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), c/o Association Management Solutions, LLC (AMS) 5177 Brandin Court, Fremont, California 94538, phone (510) 492-4080, Web site at *http://ietf.org* or directly at *https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4103.txt .* ( 1 ) Request for Comments (RFC) 4103, Real-time Transport Protocol Payload for Text Conversation (2005), IBR approved for § 67.1.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
[82 FR 7707, Jan. 23, 2017, as amended at 85 FR 64408, Oct. 13, 2020; 88 FR 21445, Apr. 10, 2023]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000866492
<NAME>                        Net/Tech International, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    USD
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           NOV-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              DEC-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                NOV-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         160,334
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,437
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               182,190
<PP&E>                                          73,048
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,474
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 292,247
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          148,642
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        93,246
<OTHER-SE>                                      48,758
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   142,004
<SALES>                                         36,022
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,022
<CGS>                                           14,674
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,732,508
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 409
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,071,877)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
§ 51.511 Forward-looking economic cost per unit. ( a ) The forward-looking economic cost per unit of an element equals the forward-looking economic cost of the element, as defined in § 51.505, divided by a reasonable projection of the sum of the total number of units of the element that the incumbent LEC is likely to provide to requesting telecommunications carriers and the total number of units of the element that the incumbent LEC is likely to use in offering its own services, during a reasonable measuring period.
( b ) ( 1 ) With respect to elements that an incumbent LEC offers on a flat-rate basis, the number of units is defined as the discrete number of elements (e.g., local loops or local switch ports) that the incumbent LEC uses or provides.
( 2 ) With respect to elements that an incumbent LEC offers on a usage-sensitive basis, the number of units is defined as the unit of measurement of the usage (e.g., minutes of use or call-related database queries) of the element.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 163 (Wednesday, August 23, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 49416]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7087]



[[Page 49416]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Economics and Statistics Administration


Performance Review Board Membership

SUMMARY: Below is a listing of individuals who are eligible to serve on 
the Performance Review Board in accordance with the Economics and 
Statistics Administration's Senior Executive Service and Senior 
Professional Performance Management Systems:
    Herman Habermann, Shirin A. Ahmed, Teresa Angueira, William G. 
Bostic, Jr., Stephanie Brown, Howard Hogan, Nancy M. Gordon, Arnold A. 
Jackson, Theodore A. Johnson, Ruth Ann Killion, Robert LaMacchia, 
Michael J. Longini, Thomas L. Mesenbourg, Jr;
    C. Harvey Monk, Andrew H. Moxam, Walter C. Odom, Jr., Marvin D. 
Raines, Brian Monaghan, Richard W. Swartz, Alan R. Tupek, Preston J. 
Waite, Mark E. Wallace, Daniel H. Weinberg, Ewen M. Wilson;
    Tommy Wright, Robert Fay III, William Bell, Elizabeth Martin, Paul 
Friday, David Findley, J. Steven Landefeld, Dennis J. Fixler, Ralph H. 
Kozlow, Alan C. Lorish, Rosemary D. Marcuss, Brent R. Moulton;
    Sumiye O. Okubo, John W. Ruser, James K. White, Katherine Wallman, 
and Dr. Jennifer Madans.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Cunningham, 301-763-3727.

    Dated: August 16, 2006.
James K. White,
Associate Under Secretary for Management, Chair, Performance Review 
Board.
[FR Doc. 06-7087 Filed 8-22-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-BS-M
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
             THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B)
          OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)


     Pursuant  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a)
and  (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Robert
L.  Long,  President  and  Chief  Executive Officer of Transocean Inc., a Cayman
Islands  corporation  (the  "Company"),  hereby  certify, to my knowledge, that:

     (1)  our  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
          2004  (the  "Report")  fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a)  or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of our operations.


Dated:  November 8, 2004                   /s/ Robert L. Long
                                           -------------------------------
                                           Name: Robert L. Long
                                                 President and Chief Executive
                                                 Officer

     The  foregoing  certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter  63  of  Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of
the  Report  or  as  a  separate  disclosure  document.

     A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to  Transocean  Inc. and will be retained by Transocean Inc. and
furnished  to  the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                        1
<PAGE>