alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Notice of intenet to rule on land release request. 

# SUMMARY:

Under the provisions of Title 49, U.S.C. Section 47153(c), notice is being given that the FAA is considering a request from the Gadsden Airport Authority to waive the requirement that a 24.4-acre parcel of surplus property, located at the Northeast Alabama Regional Airport, be used for aeronautical purposes.

# DATES:

Comments must be received on or before September 20, 2006.

# ADDRESSES:

Comments on this notice may be mailed or delivered in triplicate to the FAA at the following address: Jackson Airports District Office, 100 West Cross Street, Suite B, Jackson, MS 39208-2307.

In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be mailed or delivered to Mr. Fred Sington, Gadsden Airport Authority at the following address: P.O. Box 961, Gadsden, Alabama 35902-0961.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Keafur Grimes, Program Manager, Jackson Airports District Office, 100 West Cross Street, Suite B, Jackson, MS 39208-2307, (601) 664-9886. The land release request may be reviewed in person at this same location.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Faa is reviewing a request by the Gadsden Airport Authority to release 24.4 acres of surplus property at the Northeast Alabama Regional Airport. The property will be purchased by Rigid Building, which is a industrial facility. The property consist of forested lands. The net proceeds from the sale of this property will be used for airport purposes. 

                    Any person may inspect the request in person at the FAA office listed above under                     **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.**

In addition, any person may, upon request, inspect the request, notice and other documents germane to the request in person at the Jackson Airport District Office.

Issued in Jackson, Mississippi, on August 15, 2006.

Rans D. Black,

Manager, Jackson Airports District Office, Southern Region.

[FR Doc. 06-7058 Filed 8-18-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) Νo 1000/2005

of 30 June 2005         

fixing the export refunds on products processed from cereals and rice

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in rice (2), and in particular Article 14(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The export refunds on the products listed in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1518/95 are hereby fixed as shown in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 July 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 June 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

(2)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 96. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1549/2004 (OJ L 280, 31.8.2004, p. 13).

(3)OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 55. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2993/95 (OJ L 312, 23.12.1995, p. 25).

----

ANNEX

to Commission Regulation of 30 June 2005 fixing the export refunds on products processed from cereals and rice

----

(1)  No refund shall be granted on products given a heat treatment resulting in pregelatinisation of the starch.

(2)  Refunds are granted in accordance with Council Regulation (EEC) No 2730/75 (OJ L 281, 1.11.1975, p. 20), as amended.

----
#### § 18.101 Basis and purpose.

The rules in this part, in accordance with the applicable treaties and agreements to which the United States is a party, are promulgated pursuant to section 302 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, vesting the Federal Communications Commission with authority to regulate industrial, scientific, and medical equipment (ISM) that emits electromagnetic energy on frequencies within the radio frequency spectrum in order to prevent harmful interference to authorized radio communication services. This part sets forth the conditions under which the equipment in question may be operated.
No. 11-6303.

#### Millhouse *v.*Zickefoose, Warden.

C. A. 3d Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin*v. *District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U. S. 1 (1992) *(per curiam).*

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
#### John S. Moore, appellant, v. Letta P. Britizus et al., appellees.

Filed November 13, 1912.

No. 16,815.

Deeds: Cancelation: Evidence. In a suit in equity to cancel a deed . as having been procured by undue influence and by promise of services never performed, decree in favor of defendant affirmed as being a proper determination of the issues under the evidence.

Appeal from the district court for Boone county: James N. Paul, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*H.*(7. *Vail,*for appellant,

*W. L. Bose*and *W. F. Oritchfield, contra.*

Rose, J.

The relief sought by plaintiff is the cancelation of a deed to a quarter-section of land in Boone county. It was executed October 17, 1900, and promptly delivered. Plaintiff was grantor, and his daughter, Letta F. Moore, now Letta F. Britizus, was grantee. At the time he was a widower, 71 years old. He had a number of children, but all were married or absent except grantee, who remained single until she was 30. In 1903 she married and moved to South Dakota. Three years later she went to California, where she still resides. In the deed grantee reserved the right to use and occupy the premises during the remainder of his life, and exercised that right nine years *402before blunging suit. Plaintiff alleged, and attempted to prove, that be was infirm in body and mind, that his daughter unduly influenced him to execute the deed by promising to remain at home with him and to care for him during the remainder of his life, and that she failed to keep her promises. Grantee denied undue influence or fraud, pleaded that the decid was executed for a valuable consideration paid- in other lauds and in a valid note, and that the condition alleged in the petition was no part of the transaction, though she never refused to provide a home for her father. The trial resulted in a dismissal of the suit, and plaintiff has appealed.

The question presented by the record is: What does equity require under the evidence? After a careful consideration of the proofs of both parties, the conclusion is unanimous that there must be a finding in favor of grantee on all the controverted issues. It follows that the decree below is without error.

Affirmed.
No. 11-5636.

#### Ware *v.*Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.
Arts and Humanities Programs in Rural America

----
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4910 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4910

_______________________________________________________________________

                  IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

            October 5 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

                                Received

            October 8 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

  Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public 
                                 Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the United States courthouse under construction in White 
      Plains, New York, as the ``Thurgood Marshall United States 
                             Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse under construction at 300 Quarropas 
Street in White Plains, New York, shall be known and designated as the 
``Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Thurgood 
Marshall United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 4, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 31.2 

CERTIFICATION

I, Patrick McGowan, Chief Financial Officer of MIV Therapeutics, Inc., certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this amendment to quarterly report of MIV Therapeutics, Inc.; 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.     The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b)     Omitted;

(c)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.     The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
#### § 76.1903 Interfaces.

A covered entity shall not attach or embed data or information with commercial audiovisual content, or otherwise apply to, associate with, or allow such data to persist in or remain associated with such content, so as to prevent its output through any analog or digital output authorized or permitted under license, law or regulation governing such covered product.
#### Pine Manufacturing Company, a Florida Corporation, *Appellant,*vs. A. T. Roberson, *Appellee.*

143 So. 758.

*901Decision filed October 3, 1932.

Petition for rehearing denied October 20, 1932.

*M. 8. McGregor,*for Appellant;

*Jones <& Green,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the Orders herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respéctive parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said Orders; it is therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said Orders of the Circuit Court be, and the same are hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J. and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.
No. 11-9716.

#### Joe *v.*Florida.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 4th Dist. Certiorari denied.
[Crim. No. 739.

First Appellate District.

March 25, 1918.]

#### Ex Parte JAMES CARRERA on Habeas Corpus.

Criminal Law—Indeterminate Sentence—Offense Prior to Enactment—Pronouncement of Proper Judgment.—Upon the authority of *Fx parte Fee,*177 Cal. 690, [171 Pae. 958], the petitioner herein remanded to custody of sheriff for judgment by the superior court upon his conviction.

APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus originally made to the District Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District.

The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in *Ex parte Lee,*177 Cal. 690, [171 Pac. 958].

Edwin V. McKenzie, and Hyman Levin, for Petitioner.

U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, and Frank L. Guerena, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.

THE COURT.

Pursuant to the ease of *Ex parte Lee,*177 Cal. 690, [171 Pac. 958], it is ordered that the warden of the prison at San Quentin deliver the petitioner to the sheriff of Los Angeles County, to whose custody he is remanded ; and that the superior court of that county take such steps as may be necessary to bring the petitioner, James Carrera, before it, and pronounce judgment upon his conviction heretofore had.
No. 11-302.

No. 11-5741.

No. 11-6128.

#### In re Simon; In re Parniani-Hayman; In re Couch; and *941In re Moghaddam.

No. 11-6285.

Petitions for wits of mandamus denied.
<PAGE>


Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report MIV Therapeutics, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended February 28, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Patrick
McGowan, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Patrick McGowan
--------------------
Patrick McGowan
CFO
April 23, 2007
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 188 (Friday, September 27, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59750-59751]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-23628]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8487]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Isa Genzken: Retrospective''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Isa Genzken: Retrospective,'' imported 
from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the 
exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Museum of Modern 
Art, New York, NY, from on or about November 23, 2013, until on or 
about March 10, 2014; the Museum of Contemporary Art, Chicago, Il, from 
on or about April 12, 2014, until on or about August 3, 2014; the 
Dallas Museum of Art, from on or about September 14, 2014, until on or 
about January 4, 2015, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues 
yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that 
Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie

[[Page 59751]]

Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department 
of State (telephone: 202-632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, 
DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: September 20, 2013.
Lee Satterfield,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-23628 Filed 9-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"18-1108: PRISM TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P. [OPINION], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"cIaOgq7fNV\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/2-01-2019-18-1108-prism-technologies-llc-v-sprint-spectrum-lp-opinion-nonprecedential-18-1108-opinion-2-1-2019\/\">18-1108: PRISM TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P. [OPINION], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/2-01-2019-18-1108-prism-technologies-llc-v-sprint-spectrum-lp-opinion-nonprecedential-18-1108-opinion-2-1-2019\/embed\/#?secret=cIaOgq7fNV\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“18-1108: PRISM TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P. [OPINION], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"cIaOgq7fNV\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Opinions\/Orders posted: PRISM TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P. [OPINION](pdf) Appeal Number: 18-1108 Origin: DCT Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
Exhibit 99.2





Written Statement of Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)





The undersigned, the Executive Vice President, Finance
and Chief Financial Officer of the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority (the Authority), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, on the date hereof:





| | (a) |  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Authority for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2002 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | (b) |  | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Authority.
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




/s/     JEFFREY E. HARTMANNJeffrey E. Hartmann Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer December 19, 2002