alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         716,570
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  142,808
<ALLOWANCES>                                       500
<INVENTORY>                                      9,177
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               868,555
<PP&E>                                          33,961
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,217
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,006,487
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,712,843
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         1,242
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,712,705
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,006,487
<SALES>                                        673,608
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               673,608
<CGS>                                          100,389
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,089,309
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               133,505
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             133,505
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                130,871
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            130,871
<DISCONTINUED>                                  16,592
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   147,463
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 24

AAF-McQuay Inc.  POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTSthat each of the undersigned Directors of AAF-McQuay Inc. hereby
constitutes and appoints Ho Nyuk Choy, Bruce D. Krueger and either of them, the true and lawful agents and attorneys-in-fact of the undersigned with full power and authority in
any of said agents and attorneys-in-fact, to sign for the undersigned in their respective names as Directors of AAF-McQuay Inc., the Annual Report on
Form 10-K, and any and all further amendments to said Report, hereby ratifying and confirming all acts taken by any such agent and attorney-in-fact, as
herein authorized.

|Dated: September 12, 2002       |  |                            
|------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------
|/s/QUEK LENG CHANQuek Leng Chan |  | /s/HO NYUK CHOYHo Nyuk Choy
|/s/KWEK LENG SANKwek Leng San   |  | /s/LIU WAN MINLiu Wan Min  

---

QuickLinks
#### § 80.163 Operator requirements of the Bridge-to-Bridge Act.

Each ship subject to the Bridge-to-Bridge Act must have on board a radio operator who holds a restricted radiotelephone operator permit or higher class license.
- nh 1969
No. 10-10788.

#### Powell *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
•Brick Fbrd

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS 

### RECEIVED IN COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS 

### FEB 11 2015 NO. 

### AbelAcosta, Clerk § IN THE COURT OF § § CRIMINAL APPEALS § § 

### OF TEXAS cm Fn INI 

### COURTOF CRIMINALAPPEALS Pro Se Motion for Extension ofTime FEB 11 2015 To File Petition for Discretionary Review Absl Acostci Clsrk TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS: 

### COMES NOW the Appellant/Petitioner in the above-styled and numbered cause and 

### respectfully moves this Honorable Court to extend the time for filing the Appellant's Petition for Discretionary Review in this cause and in support thereofwould show to the Court the following: 

### 1. The style and number ofthis case in the Court ofAppeals, is: Fnr-H Y±. The StateofTexas,Appeal No. 05-13-01482 -CR. 

### 2. The style and number ofthe case in the trial court is: The StateofTexas v. 

### Ford ; CauseNo. F1355893N; from the 195TH DistrictCourtof Dallas County, Texas. 

### 3. The Appellant was convicted ofthe felony offense of Delivery Cont. Sub 

### 4. Judgment was entered on5/i7/i3and punishment was assessed at 20 Years years confinement and a fine in the amount of $10,000.00 • 

### 5. The conviction was affirmed in the Court of Appeals on m / ?fi/1 5 •

PRO SE MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

- Page 16. The deadline for filing the Appellant's Petition for Discretionary Review in this
cause is 02/25/15
. 7. An extension oftime for a period ofsixty (60) days is requested that would make the due date 04/25/15
. 8. No prior request for an extension oftime has been made. 

### 9. The facts relied upon to show good cause for the requested extension are, as follows: The Appellant/Petitioner was represented by court appointed counsel during the appeal ofthis case to the Court ofAppeals. After the conviction was affirmed, the trial court refused to 

### appoint counsel to file a Petition for Discretionary Review. Therefore, additional time is needed for the Appellant/Petitioner to either prepare and file the Petition pro se or to seek legal assistance in filing the Petition. WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the Appellant /Petitioner respectfully 

### requests that this Honorable Court extend time for filing the Petition for Discretionary Review in this cause to 04/25/15
. Respectfully submitted, 

# *5>ijlXL 1. ^A, [Name]

PRO SE MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW - Page 2CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The Appellant/Petitioner hereby certifies that a true and correct copy ofthe foregoing Motion has been mailed to the Office ofthe Criminal District Attorney for Dallas County, Frank Crowley Courts Building, 133 North Industrial Blvd., 11th Floor, Dallas, Texas 75207, and mailed via U.S. mail, to the Office ofthe State Prosecuting Attorney, P.O. Box 12405, Capitol 

### Station, Austin, Texas 78711, on the 06 day of February ,-BBft / 2015. 

# ^"rticL* f. [Name]

PRO SE MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARYREVIEW - Page 3
EXHIBIT 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We have issued our report dated December 23, 2005, accompanying the consolidated financialstatements and schedule included in the Annual Report of International DisplayWorks, Inc. on Form10-K for the year ended October 31, 2005. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference ofsaid report in the Registration Statement of International DisplayWorks, Inc., and Subsidiaries onForms S-8 (File Number 333-120404 and 333-125563) and Form S-3 (File No. 333-123013 and333-125559).     /s/ Grant Thornton    Grant Thornton         Hong Kong    January 10,2006
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 168 (Wednesday, August 30, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 51573]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7259]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security


Regulations and Procedures Technical Advisory Committee; Notice 
of Open Meeting

    The Regulations and Procedures Technical Advisory Committee will 
meet on September 12, 2006, 9 a.m., Room 4830, in the Herbert C. Hoover 
Building, 14th Street between Constitution and Pennsylvania Avenues, 
NW., Washington, DC. The Committee advises the Office of the Assistant 
Secretary for Export Administration on implementation of the Export 
Administration Regulations (EAR) and provides for continuing review to 
update the EAR as needed.

Agenda

1. Opening remarks by the Chairman.
2. Presentation of papers or comments by the public.
3. Regulations update.
4. Update on Wassenaar Statement of Understanding on Military End-uses 
(China `catch-all').
5. Country policy update: Libya, North Korea.
6. Encryption update.
7. Enforcement update.
8. Automated Export System (AES) update.
9. Working group reports.

    The meeting will be open to the public and a limited number of 
seats will be available. Reservations are not accepted. To the extent 
time permits, members of the public may present oral statements to the 
Committee. Written statements may be submitted at any time before or 
after the meeting. However, to facilitate distribution of public 
presentation materials to Committee members, the Committee suggests 
that presenters forward the public presentation materials to Yvette 
Springer at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0a53797a7863646d6f784a686379246e6569246d657c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="89d0faf9fbe0e7eeecfbc9ebe0faa7ede6eaa7eee6ff">[email protected]</span></a>.
    For more information contact Ms. Springer on (202) 482-4814.

    Dated: August 23, 2006.
Yvette Springer,
Committee Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 06-7259 Filed 8-29-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-JT-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 80.142 Ships using radiotelegraphy. ( a ) *Calling by narrow-band direct-printing.* ( 1 ) NB-DP ship stations must call United States public coast stations on frequencies designated for NB-DP operation.
( 2 ) Where it is known that the coast station maintains a watch on working frequencies for ship station NB-DP calls the ship station must make its initial NB-DP call on those frequencies.
( 3 ) Calls to a coast station or other ship station must employ the following format: Coast station identification number, repeated twice; “DE”, sent once; and ship station selective call number, repeated twice. When the coast station does not reply to a call sent three times at intervals of two minutes, the calling must cease for fifteen minutes.
( b ) *NB-DP operating procedure.* The operation of NB-DP equipment in the maritime mobile service must be in accordance with the operating procedures contained in ITU-R M.492-6 (incorporated by reference, see § 80.7).
( c ) *Required channels for radiotelegraphy.* ( 1 ) Each ship station using telegraphy on frequencies within the band 405-525 kHz must be capable of: ( i ) Transmit on at least two working frequencies and receive on all other frequencies necessary for their service using authorized emissions, and
( ii ) When a radiotelegraph installation is compulsory, a fourth frequency within this band which is authorized specifically for direction finding must also be provided.
( 2 ) Each ship station using telegraphy on frequencies within the band 90-160 kHz must be capable of transmitting and receiving Class A1A emission on the frequency 143 kHz, and on at least two additional working frequencies within this band except that portion between 140 kHz and 146 kHz.
( 3 ) Each ship station using telegraphy and operating in the bands between 4000-27500 kHz must be capable of transmitting and receiving Class A1A or J2A emission on at least one frequency authorized for calling and at least two frequencies authorized for working in each of the bands for which facilities are provided to carry on its service.
( 4 ) Each ship station using telegraphy in Region 2 on frequencies within the band 2065-2107 kHz must be capable of transmitting and receiving Class A1A or J2A emission on at least one frequency in this band authorized for working in addition to a frequency in this hand authorized for calling.
[51 FR 31213, Sept. 2, 1986, as amended at 54 FR 49993, Dec. 4, 1989; 68 FR 46961, Aug. 7, 2003; 69 FR 64672, Nov. 8, 2004; 76 FR 67610, Nov. 2, 2011]
§ 69.803 Competitive market test. ( a ) The competitive market test is used to determine which counties served by a price cap local exchange carrier, as defined in § 61.3(bb) of this chapter, are deemed competitive and therefore warrant relief from price cap regulation and detariffing of DS1 and DS3 end user channel terminations, and certain other business data services, sold by such carriers.
( b ) *Initial test.* A county is deemed competitive in the initial competitive market test if: ( 1 ) Either 50 percent of the locations with business data services demand within the county are within one half mile of a location served by a competitive provider based on data from the special access data collection, or 75 percent of the census blocks within the county are reported to have broadband connection availability by a cable operator based on Form 477 data as of December 2016. Lists of counties deemed competitive, non-competitive or grandfathered by the initial competitive market test are published on the Commission's Web site.
( 2 ) The DS1 and DS3 end user channel terminations sold by price cap local exchange carriers in counties deemed competitive are no longer subject to price cap regulation and are detariffed according to § 61.201.
( c ) *Subsequent tests.* The results of the initial competitive market test will be updated every three years following the effective date of the initial test. ( 1 ) A county will be deemed competitive in a subsequent competitive market test if 75 percent of the census blocks within the county are reported to have broadband connection availability by a cable operator based on Form 477 data as of the date of the most recent collection.
( 2 ) No later than three years following the effective date of the previous test, the Wireline Competition Bureau will conclude a subsequent test and will publish a revised list of counties deemed competitive at the conclusion of the test.
( 3 ) A county deemed competitive in the competitive market test will retain its status in subsequent tests.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 957/2005

of 23 June 2005         

altering the export refunds on white sugar and raw sugar exported in the natural state fixed by Regulation (EC) No 846/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The export refunds on the products listed in Article 1(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001, undenatured and exported in the natural state, as fixed in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 846/2005 are hereby altered to the amounts shown in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 24 June 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 June 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

(2)OJ L 140, 3.6.2005, p. 6.

----

ANNEX

AMENDED AMOUNTS OF REFUNDS ON WHITE SUGAR AND RAW SUGAR EXPORTED WITHOUT FURTHER PROCESSING APPLICABLE FROM 24 JUNE 2005 (1)

----

(1)  The amounts set out in this Annex are not applicable with effect from 1 February 2005 pusrsuant to Council Decision 2005/45/EC of 22 December 2004 concerning the conclusion and the provisional application of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation amending the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Swiss Confederation of 22 July 1972 as regards the provisions applicable to processed agricultural products (OJ L 23, 26.1.2005, p. 17).

(2)  This amount is applicable to raw sugar with a yield of 92 %. Where the yield for exported raw sugar differs from 92 %, the refund amount applicable shall be calculated in accordance with Article 28(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001.

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6821

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; JOHN ASHCROFT, Plaintiffs - Appellees, versus DOUGLAS ALAN JARVIS, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CR-91-70-N, CA-91-235-2) Submitted: June 20, 2001 Decided: June 28, 2001 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Douglas Alan Jarvis, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Douglas Alan Jarvis appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion to Reconsider Transfer Order,” construed as a motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order construing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition as a 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000) motion, and dismissing it without prejudice as successive. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Jarvis , Nos. CR-91-70-N;CA-91-235-2 (E.D. Va. Apr. 27, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

 CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zap.Com Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Leonard DiSalvo,
as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 to the best of my knowledge, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a or
            15d of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Leonard DiSalvo
------------------------
Leonard DiSalvo
Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer
August 8, 2005

This Certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
§ 80.1179 On-board repeater limitations. When an on-board repeater is used, the following limitations must be met: ( a ) The on-board repeater antenna must be located no higher than 3 meters (10 feet) above the vessel's highest working deck.
( b ) Each on-board repeater must have a timer that deactivates the transmitter if the carrier remains on for more than 3 minutes.
[51 FR 31213, Sept. 2, 1986, as amended at 58 FR 44954, Aug. 25, 1993]
795 A.2d 849

#### IN THE MATTER OF JOHN M. POWER, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 034421992).

April 29, 2002.

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court pursuant to *Rule*1:20—10(b), following a motion for discipline by consent of JOHN M. POWER of PARAMUS, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1992;

And the Committee on Attorney Advertising and respondent having signed a stipulation of discipline by consent in which it was agreed that respondent violated *RPC*7.1(a)(1)(making false and misleading communications about lawyer’s services) and Opinion 25, 153 *N.J.L.J.*1298, 7 *N.J.L.*2250 (1998);

And the parties having agreed that respondent’s conduct violated *RPC*7.1(a)(1) and Opinion 25, 153 *N.J.L.J.*1298, 7 *N.J.L.*2250 (1998), and that said conduct warrants a reprimand;

And the parties having agreed that for a period of two years respondent should submit any and all advertisements, solicitations, flyers and related communications to the Committee on Attorney Advertising for pre-publication approval pursuant to *Rule*1:19A-2(d) and *Rule*1:19A-3;

*471And the Disciplinary Review Board having determined that a reprimand is the appropriate discipline for respondent’s ethics violations and having granted the motion for discipline by consent;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having determined that for a period of two years respondent should submit any and all advertisements, solicitations, flyers and related communications to the Committee on Attorney Advertising for pre-publication approval;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having submitted the record of the proceedings to the Clerk of the Supreme Court for the entry of an order of discipline in accordance with *Rule.*1:20-16(e);

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JOHN M. POWER of PARAMUS is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that for a period of two years respondent shall submit for approval to the Committee on Attorney Advertising all proposed advertisements, solicitations, flyers and related communications for his practice, effective immediately and until further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
§ 80.757 Topographical data. ( a ) In the preparation of profile graphs and in determining the location and height above sea level of the antenna site, the elevations or contour intervals must be taken from U.S. Geological Survey topographic quadrangle maps, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers maps or Tennessee Valley Authority maps, whichever is the latest, for all areas for which maps are available. If such maps are not published for the area in question, the next best topographic information must be used. The maps used must include the principal area to be served. U.S. Geological Survey topographic quadrangle maps may be obtained from the Eastern Distribution Branch, U.S. Geological Survey, 1200 South Eads Street, Arlington, VA 22202, for maps of areas east of the Mississippi River, including Minnesota, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands, and from the Western Distribution Branch, U.S. Geological Survey, Federal Center, Denver CO 80225, for maps of areas west of the Mississippi River, including Alaska, Hawaii, Louisiana, Guam and American Samoa. Sectional aeronautical charts are available from the Distribution Division, National Ocean Service, Riverdale, MD 20840.
( b ) In lieu of maps, the average terrain elevation may be computer generated, using elevations from a 30 second point or better topographic data file such as those available for the U.S. Geological Survey's National Geographic Information Center or the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's National Geophysical Data Center. In case of dispute maps will be used to determine the correct value.
#### § 69.405 Published directory expenses in Account 6620.

Published Directory expenses shall be assigned to the Information element.