alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit31.1**

****

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER**

**OF**

**COMMERCIAL NATIONAL FINANCIALCORPORATION**

****

**I, Gregg E. Hunter,Chief Executive Officer, Commercial National Financial Corporationcertify that:**

****

I have reviewed this annual reporton Form 10-K of Commercial National FinancialCorporation;

****

Based on my knowledge, this annualreport does not contain any untrue statement of material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis annual report;

****

Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;

****

The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15) for the registrant and wehave:

****

**a)             designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure control and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this annual report is beingprepared;**

****

evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and

****

disclosed in this report any changein the Corporation’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Corporation’s fourthfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Corporation’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and

****

The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and to the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors:

****

**a)     all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial data;and**

****

**b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.**

****

****
| Date: March 26,2004 | By: | /s/ Gregg E.Hunter     |
|---------------------|-----|------------------------|
|                     |     | Gregg E. Hunter        |
|                     |     | Chief ExecutiveOfficer |
§ 68.7 Technical criteria for terminal equipment. ( a ) Terminal equipment shall not cause harm, as defined in § 68.3, to the public switched telephone network.
( b ) Technical criteria published by the Administrative Council for Terminal Attachments are the presumptively valid technical criteria for the protection of the public switched telephone network from harms caused by the connection of terminal equipment, subject to the appeal procedures in § 68.614 of this part.
[66 FR 7581, Jan. 24, 2001]
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 503

To repeal the mandatory 20 percent income tax withholding on eligible rollover

distributions which are not rolled over.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 21, 1993

Mr. DARDEN (for himself and Mr. SCHUMER) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To repeal the mandatory 20 percent income tax withholding

on eligible rollover distributions which are not rolled over.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF MANDATORY 20 PERCENT WITH4 HOLDING ON ELIGIBLE ROLLOVER DISTRIBU5 TIONS WHICH ARE NOT ROLLED OVER.

6 Subsection (b) of section 522 of the Unemployment

7 Compensation Amendments of 1992 (relating to withhold8 ing on eligible rollover distributions which are not rolled

9 over), and the amendments made by such subsection, are

10 hereby repealed; and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986
2

•HR 503 IH

1 shall be applied and administered as if such subsection,

2 and amendments, had never been enacted.

Æ
SECOND AMENDMENT





                                                                                                                        Exhibit
10.27


AMENDMENT



TO



CHANGE
IN CONTROL AGREEMENT


AGREEMENT by
and between PARKWAY PROPERTIES, INC., a Maryland corporation (the "Company"),
with offices at One Jackson Place, Suite 1000, 188 East Capitol Street,
Jackson, Mississippi 39225-4647, and ________________ (the
"Executive"), an individual residing
at_______________________________, dated as of the 3rd day of November,
2006.


WHEREAS, the
Company entered into an agreement designated the Change in Control Agreement
with the Executive, dated as of the 22nd day of August, 2003; and


WHEREAS, due
to a proofreading error, a line was dropped from the definition of "Change
in Control" in Section 2 of the Change in Control Agreement.


NOW
THEREFORE, the parties, for good and valuable consideration and intending to be
legally bound, agree as follows:


1.                 
Part (C)(i) of the definition of Change in Control in Section 2(b) is
amended by the insertion of the phrase "of each surviving entity) more
than 50 percent of the combined voting power of the voting securities of the
Company or of such surviving entity," so that part (C)(i) as amended shall
read as follows:


                    (i)         a
merger or consolidation that would result in the voting securities of the
Company outstanding immediately before the merger or consolidation continuing
to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting
securities of such surviving entity) more than 50 percent of the combined
voting power of the voting securities of the Company or of such surviving
entity outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation or .


2.                 
The change to the Change in Control Agreement described in paragraph 1
is effective November 3, 2006.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the Executive has set his hand to this Agreement and the Company has caused this
Agreement to be executed as of the day and year first above written.


PARKWAY PROPERTIES, INC.




 




By________________________________


EXECUTIVE


__________________________________
Exhibit 10.13 - CANCELLATION AGREEMENT.



Exhibit 10.13


 


CANCELLATION AGREEMENT


We the undersigned being parties to an Executive Services Agreement dated May 1, 2006 do hereby mutually agree to cancel the Executive Services Agreement effective January 31, 2007 without recourse to either party.


 

Dated this 31st day of January, 2007.


 

GLOBAL GREEN SOLUTIONS INC.                                       SIGMA CONSULT bvba


By:  ELDEN SCHORN                                                                By:  J. D. FRATER

       Elden Schorn                                                                               James Douglas Frater

Title: Chairman and Director                                                         Title: Managing Partner
**EXHIBIT 31.03**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Michael M. McNamara, certify that:

 

1.              I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Flex Ltd.; and

 

2.              Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 
| Date: June 20, 2018 |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
|                     |   |
| /s/ MICHAEL M. MCNAMARA  |   |
| Michael M. McNamara      |   |
| Chief Executive Officer  |   |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4812 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 548

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4812

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To direct the Administrator of General Services to acquire by transfer 
the Old U.S. Mint in San Francisco, California, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

               August 9 (legislative day, August 8), 1994

                         Placed on the calendar

                                                       Calendar No. 548
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4812

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               August 9 (legislative day, August 8), 1994

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To direct the Administrator of General Services to acquire by transfer 
the Old U.S. Mint in San Francisco, California, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OLD U.S. MINT, SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA.

    Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Administrator of General Services shall take such actions as may be 
necessary to acquire by transfer, without consideration, the property 
referred to as the ``Old U.S. Mint'', located at Fifth and Mission 
Streets in San Francisco, California, together with any improvements, 
structures, and fixtures located on the property.

            Passed the House of Representatives August 8, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 157 (Tuesday, August 15, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 46913]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6916]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology; American Health Information Community Confidentiality and 
Security Workgroup Meeting

ACTION: New Meeting Date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the rescheduled date of the first 
meeting of the American Health Information Community Confidentiality 
and Security Workgroup in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.). The Confidentiality and 
Security Workgroup was created by the American Health Information 
Community as a cross-cutting Workgroup comprised of privacy, security, 
clinical, and technical experts, as well as representation from the 
consumer perspective.
    New Date Time: August 21, 2006, 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. This meeting was 
previously scheduled to be held on August 4, 2006.

ADDRESSES: Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW, Washington, DC 
20201), Conference Room 4090.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/workgroups.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be available via Web cast 
at http://www.eventcenterlive.com/cfmx/ec/login/login1.cfm?BID=67.

    Dated: August 3, 2006.
Judith Sparrow,
Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and 
Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology.
[FR Doc. 06-6916 Filed 8-14-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
Trustee
 
 First Supplemental Indenture
Dated as of January 1, 1996




---



##### 



. Assumption




---



##### 



Substitution of Successor Corporation
 Governing Law
 Counterparts
 Trustee Not Responsible
  TOYS R US, INC.By:
    /s/ Louis LipschitzName:
    Louis LipschitzTitle:
    Senior Vice President 
Finance and 
Chief Financial OfficerAttest:/s/ Andre WeissSecretaryTOYS R US-DELAWARE, INC.By:
    /s/ Louis LipschitzName:
    Louis LipschitzTitle:
    Senior Vice President 
Finance and 
Chief Financial OfficerAttest:/s/ Andre WeissSecretary 2
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

GUS MASSEY JR.

,

Appellant,

v.

EL PASO, TEXAS CITY ATTORNEY’S

OFFICE

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 22

- 00090

- CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law Number Three

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2021

- CCV00636)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. It appearing to this Court that

Appellant is indigent for purposes of appeal, this Court makes no other order with respect to costs.

This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 27TH DAY OF APRIL, 2023.

G INA M. PALAFOX

, Justice

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-26-1998
<CASH>                                           1,348
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,909
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,066
<INVENTORY>                                      1,452
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,797
<PP&E>                                           3,679
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,078
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,583
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        27,116
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,078
<SALES>                                          9,428
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,428
<CGS>                                            6,288
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,288
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 539
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,234)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,234)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (9,354)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (14,588)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.36)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                     Exhibit 3.3



                              ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                       RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                              VERDANT BRANDS, INC.



1.       The name of the corporation is Verdant Brands, Inc., a Minnesota
         corporation.

2.       The Restated Articles of Incorporation are amended to read as follows:

                  (i) Article III is amended by deleting "25,000,000" where it
                  appears therein, and substituting "50,000,000" thereof.

3.       The amendment has been adopted pursuant to Chapter 302A of the
         Minnesota Business Corporation Act.



                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, Mark G. Eisenschenk,
         Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, treasurer and
         Secretary of Verdant Brands, Inc., being duly authorized on behalf of
         Verdant Brands, Inc. has executed this document this 7th day of
         December 1998.



                                   /S/ Mark G. Eisenschenk
                                   -----------------------
                                   Mark G. Eisenschenk, Executive Vice
                                   President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer
                                   and Secretary
#### § 90.810 Bidding credits for small businesses.

A winning bidder that qualifies as a small business, as defined in § 90.814(b)(1), or a consortium of small businesses may use a bidding credit of 15 percent to lower the cost of its winning bid on any of the blocks identified in § 90.617(d), Table 4B. A winning bidder that qualifies as a small business, as defined in § 90.814(b)(2), or a consortium of small businesses may use a bidding credit of 10 percent to lower the cost of its winning bid on any of the blocks identified in § 90.617(d), Table 4B.

[68 FR 43000, July 21, 2003]
#### § 80.417 FCC Rules and Regulations.

The Commission's printed publications are described in subpart C of part 0 of this chapter. These publications may be purchased from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. The Commission does not furnish copies of these publications but will furnish a price list, Information Services and Publications—Bulletin No. 1, upon request. Requests for copies of this list may be directed to the Consumer Information Bureau, Consumer Information Network Division. Information bulletins and fact sheets containing information about communications issues and the Federal Communications Commission are also available on the Commission's web site at *www.fcc.gov* or *ftp.fcc.gov.*

[68 FR 46972, Aug. 7, 2003]
[Civ. No. 1475.

Second Appellate District.

July 14, 1914.]

#### WILBERT MORGRAGE, Appellant, v. THE NATIONAL BANK OF CALIFORNIA (a Corporation), Respondent.

Costs on Appeal—Failure to Insert Provision in Remittitur— Motion to Recall and Insert Provision.—Where a judgment is affirmed by the appellate court, but the *remittitur*contains no provision that the respondent shall recover his costs on appeal, the *remittitur*may be recalled on motion and the clerk be directed to issue a new one containing a provision for such costs.

MOTION by respondent to recall Remittitur.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

W. N. Goodwin, and Hunsaker & Britt, for Appellant.

Trippet, Chapman & Biby, for Respondent.

THE COURT.

The judgment herein was, on appeal to this court, affirmed in an opinion filed herein on the twenty-sixth day of February, 1914. *(Morgrage*v. *National Bank of Cal.,*24 Cal. App. 103, [140 Pac. 300].) At the expiration of sixty days the clerk of the court issued to the court below a *remittitur*which contained no provision to the effect that respondent should recover its costs on appeal. On June 16, 1914, respondent moved the court for a recall of the *remittitur*and the issuance of a new one containing a judgment in its favor for such costs. No doubt exists that under the provisions of section 1027 of the Code of Civil Procedure, as amended in 1913, [Stats. 1913, p. 1033], respondent is entitled to costs as therein provided and which, as stated, were omitted from the judgment of this court. Upon authority of the opinion of the supreme court, filed May 26, 1914, in the case of *Estate of Prager,*167 Cal. 737 [141 Pac. 369], which involved the identical question here presented, it is ordered that the *remittitur*heretofore issued be recalled, and the clerk is directed to Issue in lieu thereof a new *remittitur,*inserting therein a provision that respondent recover its costs on appeal.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the amendment no. 1 quarterly report of MIV Therapeutics, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 28, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Alan Lindsay, Chief Executive Officer and Patrick McGowan, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



(1)          the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





|Dated:  October 22, 2007 | /s/ Alan Lindsay
Alan Lindsay
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)                    
|------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated:  October 22, 2007 | /s/ Patrick McGowanPatrick McGowan
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### Jennie Kind, Respondent, *v.*John T. Barry, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

February, 1910.)

Principal and agent — Rights and liabilities of principal as to third person — Extent of actual authority of agent to bind principal (including implied authority)—Act of one of several agents.

A power of attorney to three persons is presumed to have been intended to confer authority upon them jointly, and a contract by one of them is not binding upon the principal, in the absence of proof of a contrary intention.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, eighth district, borough of Manhattan, rendered in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial by the court without a jury.

Ellison, MacIntyre & Davis (Arnold L. Davis, of counsel), for' appellant.

Menken Brothers (Mortimer M. Menken and Howard T. Cole, of counsel), for respondent.

Whitney. 3.

Defendant with others gave a power of attorney to three persons named, as his attorneys in fact. Plaintiff has recovered judgment against him upon a contract made by one only of the three. Presumptively such an authority was a joint one (Story Agency, § 42; Mechem Agency, § 77 and cases cited; Hawley v. Keeler, 53 N. Y. 114, 121); and there is nothing in the power of attorney to indicate the contrary, but much that is confirmatory. For this reason as well as that stated in Kind v. Cortis, decided herewith *(ante,*p. 186), the judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered.

Seabury and Guy, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.'