alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.15 - Standard Office Building Lease


    
      
        

      

    

    Return to 10K

    EXHIBIT
      10.15

     

    ADDENDUM
      TO LEASE

     

    LET
      THIS SERVE AS AN ADDENDUM
      TO THE LEASE ENTERED INTO ON January
      23, 2002
      BY AND BETWEEN Hallandale
      Place, Ltd. (as
      "Landlord") and Commercial
      Bank of Florida
      (as
      "Tenant"), having its place
      of
      business
      at
1448
      E. Hallandale Beach Boulevard, Hallandale, FL 33009.

     

    IN
      THE EVENT this
      Addendum conflicts with any provision of the Lease, the terms and conditions
      of
      the Addendum shall prevail.

     

    NOW
      THEREFORE,
      in
      consideration of
      the
      premises mutually exchanged
      herein and other good and valuable
      consideration, the adequacy and receipt of which is hereby acknowledged by
      both
      parties, it is agreed
      as
      follows:

     

    1. 
The
      Landlord and the Tenant have agreed to
      extend the term of the referenced Lease for an additional Five (5) years,
      commencing February 1, 2007 and ending January 31, 2012.

     

    2. 
      The base rent will be $27.00 per square foot in Year One (1) of this
      extension.

     

    3. 
Thereafter,
      the base rent will be subject to an annual CPI increase of
      no
      less then Four Percent (4%)
      and
      no more then
      Six
      Percent (6%).

     

    4. 
The
      common area maintenance, insurance, and real estate taxes shall be paid and
      shall adjust according to the Lease
      documents.

     

    5. 
All
      other
      terms and conditions of
      the
      original Lease Agreement shall
      remain in full force and effect.

     

    LET
      THIS ADDENDUM be attached and become a part of the Lease dated
January
      23, 2002,
      by and between
      Hallandale
      Place, Ltd.
      (as "Landlord"), and Commercial
      Bank of Florida
      (as "Tenant"). All other
      terms and
      conditions of said Lease
      shall remain the same.

     

    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF
      this
      Addendum has,
      been
      duly executed by both parties hereto on this 4
      day
      of
December,
      2006.

     

    
      
        	Signed,
                sealed and delivered in the presence of:	 	 LANDLORD: 
                hallandale Place, Ltd.	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 /s/
                Alan Goldstein	 
	 	 	 BY: 
                Hallandale Place, LLC, General Partner	 
	 	 	 BY: 
                Alan Goldstein, Partner	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 TENANT: 
                Commercial Bank of Florida	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 /s/
                Bruce Steinberger	 
	 	 	 BY: 
                Bruce Steinberger, President
#### § 73.766 [Reserved]
#### § 76.940 Prospective rate reduction.

A franchising authority may order a cable operator to implement a reduction in basic service tier or associated equipment rates where necessary to bring rates into compliance with the standards set forth in §§ 76.922 and 76.923
Exhibit 23
 
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 The Board of Directors
 Celadon Group, Inc.:
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Celadon Group, Inc. Registration Statement 333-14641 on Form S-8 pertaining to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan dated October 23, 1996, Registration Statement 333-42209 on Form S-8 pertaining to the Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan dated December 12, 1997, Registration Statements 333-42207 and 333-31164 on Form S-8 pertaining to the 1994 Stock Option plan dated December 12, 1997 and February 25, 2000, respectively, and Registration Statement 333-131227 on Form S-8 pertaining to the 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan dated January 23, 2006, of our report dated August 31, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Celadon Group, Inc. as of June 30, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2010, and related financial statement Schedule II, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2010, which report appears in the June 30, 2010, annual report on Form 10-K of Celadon Group, Inc.
 
 
 /s/ KPMG, LLP
 
 Indianapolis, Indiana
 August 31, 2010
 
  Back to Form 10-K
No. 11-5101.

#### Keisling *v.*Renn et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certio-rari denied.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
#### § 80.107 Service of private coast stations and marine-utility stations.

A private coast station or a marine-utility station is authorized to transmit messages necessary for the private business and operational needs of ships and the safety of aircraft.
---

Exhibit 13.1

|CERTIFICATION                                                             
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Pursuant to 18 United States Code § 1350                                  
|As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certify
that the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2010
of PolyMet Mining Corp. (the Company) filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: April 30, 2010 | By:    | /s/
      Joseph Scipioni                   
|-------------------- | ------ | --------------------------------------------
|                     | Name:  | Joseph Scipioni                             
|                     |        | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
|                     | Title: | Officer                                     
|                     |        |                                             
|Date: April 30, 2010 | By:    | /s/
      Douglas Newby                     
|                     | Name:  | Douglas Newby                               
|                     |        | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
|                     | Title: | Officer)                                    

---
---

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 United States Code §
1350As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

The
  undersigned hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal
  year ended January 31, 2008 of PolyMet Mining Corp. (the Company)
  filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies
  with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
  of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in
  all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
  the Company.

|Date: April 29, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Joseph Scipioni          
|-------------------- | ------ | -----------------------------
|                     | Name:  | Joseph Scipioni              
|                     | Title: | Chief Executive
      Officer
|                     |        |                              
|                     |        |                              
|Date: April 29, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Douglas Newby            
|                     | Name:  | Douglas Newby                
|                     | Title: | Chief Financial
      Officer

---
No. 11-5726.

#### Lee *v.*Spooner Petroleum Co. et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-5935.

#### Zavala *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
                                                                    ------------



                         CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                         ----------------------------



  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
  (Form S-8 No.33-17393) pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1994 Stock
  Option Plan, the 1995 Executive Bonus and Stock Option Plan, the Non-Employee
  Directors Option Plan and the Original Directors Option Plan of Engineering
  Animation, Inc. of our report dated January 17, 1997, with respect to the
  consolidated financial statements of Engineering Animation, Inc. included in
  the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.


                                        /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


  Des Moines, Iowa
  March 26, 1997
#### § 102-38.325 What are the requirements pertaining to antitrust laws?

When the sale of personal property has an estimated fair market value of $3 million or more or if the sale involves a patent, process, technique, or invention, you must notify the Attorney General of the Department of Justice (DOJ) and get DOJ's opinion as to whether the sale would give the buyer an unfair advantage in the marketplace and violate any antitrust laws. Include in the notification the description and location of the property, method of sale and proposed selling price, and information on the proposed purchaser and intended use of the property. You must not complete the sale until you have received confirmation from the Attorney General that the proposed transaction would not violate any antitrust laws.

[68 FR 51421, Aug. 26, 2003; 68 FR 53219, Sept. 9, 2003]
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 17 (Thursday, January 26, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 4378]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-710]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act

    Under 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on December 29, 
2005, a proposed consent decree in United States v. 9.67 Acres of Land, 
More or Less, Located at 350 Mt Pleasant Avenue, Borough of Wallington, 
Bergen County, New Jersey, Civil Action No. 01-cv-3382, was lodged with 
the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey.
    In this in rem action, the United States sought cost recovery for 
costs incurred in connection with the Industrial Latex Superfund Site 
located in the Borough of Wallington, Bergen County, New Jersey (the 
``Site''). Under the terms of the consent decree, the Site property 
will be sold and the proceeds divided among the settling parties.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the consent 
decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, 
Environment and Natural Resources Division, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611, and should refer to 
United States v. 9.67 Acres of Land, More or Less, Located at 350 Mt 
Pleasant Avenue, Borough of Wallington, Bergen County, New Jersey, 
Civil Action No. 01-cv-3382, D.J. Ref. 90-11-3-07502.
    The consent decree may be examined at the Office of the United 
States Attorney, Peter Rodino Federal Building, 970 Broad Street, Suite 
700, Newark, NJ 07102 and at U.S. EPA Region II, 290 Broadway, New 
York, NY 10007. A copy of the consent decree may also be examined on 
the following Department of Justice Web site, http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/open.html. A copy of the consent decree may also be obtained by 
mail from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of 
Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611 or by faxing or e-mailing a request 
to Tonia Fleetwood (<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5e2a3130373f7038323b3b2a2931313a1e2b2d3a313470393128"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="483c27262129662e242d2d3c3f27272c083d3b2c2722662f273e">[email protected]</span></a>), fax no. (202) 514-0097, 
phone confirmation number (202) 514-1547. In requesting a copy of the 
consent decree without appendices, please enclose a check in the amount 
of $18.25 (25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the U.S. 
Treasury.

Ronald Gluck,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment 
and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 06-710 Filed 1-25-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
APPENDIX K

	Reasons for exclusion during abstract review process

Exclusion Criterion on Abstract Review Forma	Number Excluded

Did not include human data	13

Adults not part of study population	0

Not in English	1

No original data	28

Does not address open angle glaucoma or primary open angle closure glaucoma	483

Was neither a controlled trial nor a case series ≥100 patients	403

Only addresses intracapsular cataract extraction	27

Only addresses full thickness glaucoma surgery	2

Meeting abstract	0

Other (e.g., does not address cataract surgery)	30

aNote: Reviewers did not have to agree on reason for exclusion
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4628

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to extend

certain provisions relating to verification of wages and issuance of duty

refund certificates to insular producers in the United States Virgin

Islands, Guam, and American Samoa, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 22, 1994

Mr. DE LUGO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United

States to extend certain provisions relating to verification

of wages and issuance of duty refund certificates to

insular producers in the United States Virgin Islands,

Guam, and American Samoa, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF VERIFICATION AND CERTIFI4 CATE ISSUANCE PROVISIONS.

5 Additional U.S. Note 5(h)(i) to Chapter 91 of the

6 Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is
2

•HR 4628 IH

1 amended by striking ‘‘and before January 1, 1995,’’ and

2 inserting ‘‘and before January 1, 2007,’’.

3 SEC. 2. CIVIL PENALTY FOR IMPORTING MERCHANDISE

4 WITH A COUNTERFEIT MARK.

5 Section 1526 of title 19, United States Code, is

6 amended by adding a subsection (f) to read as follows:

7 ‘‘(f) Any person who directs, assists financially or

8 otherwise, or is in any way concerned with the importation

9 of merchandise seized pursuant to paragraph (e) shall be

10 subject to a civil fine. For the first such seizure, the fine

11 shall be equal to the value that the merchandise would

12 have had if it were genuine. For the second seizure and

13 thereafter, the fine shall be equal to twice the value that

14 the merchandise would have had if it were genuine.’’.

Æ
<PAGE>

Exhibit 10.19


                      [Union Bank of California letterhead]


                                  June 22, 2001


VIA FACSIMILE AND FIRST-CLASS U.S. MAIL
---------------------------------------

SVI Solutions, Inc.
12707 High Bluff Drive
Suite 335
San Diego, California 92130
Attention:    Mr. Kevin O'Neill
              Chief Financial Officer

Dear Kevin:

         Reference is made to the Term Loan Agreement, dated as of June 3, 1999,
by and between SVI Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (successor-by-merger
to SVI Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation) ("Borrower"), and Union Bank of
California, N.A. (the "Bank"), as amended (collectively, the "Loan Agreement").
All capitalized terms used in this letter without definition shall have the
respective meanings specified in the Loan Agreement.

         This letter shall confirm that Bank has agreed to extend the term of
the Loan Agreement from April 30, 2001 to June 30, 2001. All other terms of the
Loan Agreement and the other Loan Documents are unchanged.

         Please indicate your agreement to the terms of this letter by signing
in the space provided below. Of course, if you have any questions, please give
me a call.

                                             Very truly yours,

                                             UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA, N.A.


                                             By: /s/ Joel Steiner
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Joel Steiner
                                                Vice President



ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:

SVI SOLUTIONS, INC.,
a Delaware corporation

By: /s/ Kevin O'Neill
   -----------------------------------------
   Kevin O'Neill
   Chief Financial Officer
No. 11-44.

#### South Carolina *v.*Parker.

Sup. Ct. S. C. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed *informa pauperis*granted. Certiorari denied.
PUBLIC LAW 112–185—OCT. 5, 2012 126 STAT. 1425 

Public Law 112–185 

112th Congress 

An Act 

To confirm full ownership rights for certain United States astronauts to artifacts 

from the astronauts’ space missions. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DEFINITION OF ARTIFACT. 

For purposes of this Act, the term ‘‘artifact’’ means, with respect 

to an astronaut described in section 2(a), any expendable item 

utilized in missions for the Mercury, Gemini, or Apollo programs 

through the completion of the Apollo-Soyuz Test Project not 

expressly required to be returned to the National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration at the completion of the mission and other 

expendable, disposable, or personal-use items utilized by such astronaut during participation in any such program. The term includes 

personal logs, checklists, flight manuals, prototype and proof test 

articles used in training, and disposable flight hardware salvaged 

from jettisoned lunar modules. The term does not include lunar 

rocks and other lunar material. 

SEC. 2. FULL OWNERSHIP OF ARTIFACTS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—A United States astronaut who participated 

in any of the Mercury, Gemini, or Apollo programs through the 

completion of the Apollo-Soyuz Test Project, who received an artifact 

during his participation in any such program, shall have full ownership of and clear title to such artifact. 

(b) NO FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CLAIM.—The Federal Government shall have no claim or right to ownership, control, or use 

of any artifact in possession of an astronaut as described in subsection (a) or any such artifact that was subsequently transferred, 

Oct. 5, 2012 

[H.R. 4158] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
126 STAT. 1426 PUBLIC LAW 112–185—OCT. 5, 2012 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4158: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 158 (2012): 

Sept. 19, considered and passed House. 

Sept. 21, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

sold, or assigned to a third party by an astronaut described in 

subsection (a). 

Approved October 5, 2012. 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MICHAEL PAUL MIRUCKI
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 3101

[ December 10, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County ; Sherwood Bauer , Judge; L.T. Case No. 432018CF000399A, 432017CF001315A

.

Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, and Richard G. Bartmon, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Fourth District, West Palm Beach, for appe llant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeanine Germanowicz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN

, G ERBER
, and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
706 P.2d 93

#### Leo Robert HOUCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE of Idaho, Defendant-Respondent.

No. 15601.

Court of Appeals of Idaho.

Aug. 30, 1985.

*205Leo Houck, pro se.

Jim Jones, Atty. Gen., Lynn E. Thomas, Sol. Gen., Robert R. Gates, Deputy Atty. Gen., Boise, for defendant-respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Leo Houck, a former inmate at the Idaho State Correctional Institution, brought this action against the State of Idaho and former members of the Commission of Pardons and Parole seeking monetary damages for alleged irregularities in proceedings concerning his parole. Houck mailed a copy of the complaint and summons to each defendant by registered mail, rather than having them served personally as required by I.R.C.P. 4(d)(1), (2) and (5). As permitted by I.R.C.P. 4(i) and 12(b)(2), defendants filed a motion to dismiss, asserting various defenses including “insufficiency of process and insufficiency of service of process.” Houck moved for entry of the defendants’ default because of their failure to answer the complaint within twenty days.

Following a hearing on these motions the district court denied Houck’s motion for default and issued an order dismissing the case without prejudice for failure to personally serve the summons and complaint as required by the rules cited above. The district court’s ruling was correct. Therefore, the order is affirmed.
No. 11-10182.

#### Lucas *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-9564.

#### Hood *v.*Koon, Warden.

Super. Ct. Chatham County, Ga. Certiorari denied.
§ 73.611 Emission levels and mask filter. ( a ) The power level of emissions on frequencies outside the authorized channel of operation must be attenuated no less than the following amounts below the average transmitted power within the authorized channel. In the first 500 kHz from the channel edge the emissions must be attenuated no less than 47 dB. More than 6 MHz from the channel edge, emissions must be attenuated no less than 110 dB. At any frequency between 0.5 and 6 MHz from the channel edge, emissions must be attenuated no less than the value determined by the following formula: Formula 1 to Paragraph (a) Attenuation in dB = −11.5(Δf + 3.6); Where: Δf = frequency difference in MHz from the edge of the channel.
( b ) This attenuation is based on a measurement bandwidth of 500 kHz. Other measurement bandwidths may be used as long as appropriate correction factors are applied. Measurements need not be made any closer to the band edge than one half of the resolution bandwidth of the measuring instrument. Emissions include sidebands, spurious emissions and radio frequency harmonics. Attenuation is to be measured at the output terminals of the transmitter (including any filters that may be employed). In the event of interference caused to any service, greater attenuation may be required.
[89 FR 7243, Feb. 1, 2024]
EXHIBIT 32.1

# Certification of
Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the annual report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (this report), of SPAR
Group, Inc. (the registrant), the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his
knowledge:

1.       
          The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2.       
          The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.

| | 
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | 

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SPAR Group, Inc. and will be
retained by SPAR Group, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.