alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA r PR 23-0232 

### JUN 2 7 2023 IN RE MOTION FOR ADMISSION UPON UNIFORM BAR EXAMINATION SCORE TRANSFER Bowen Cif .-enwood Clerk or Supreme court State of Montana ORDER

Elizabeth Mischell Pennock has filed a petition for admission to the State Bar of Montanapursuant toRule IV ofthe Rules for Admission totheBar ofthe State ofMontana, governing admission upon Uniform Bar Examination score transfer. The Bar Admissions Administrator ofthe State Bar ofMontana has informed the Court that the Commission on Character and Fitness has certified that Pennock has provided the necessary documentation and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission under Rule IV ofthe Rules for Admission to the State Bar ofMontana. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and competition of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions Administrator, Elizabeth Mischell Pennock may be sworn in to the practice oflaw in the State ofMontana. Arrangements for swearing-in may be made by contacting the office of the Clerk ofthe Montana Supreme Court. The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to the Petitioner and the State Bar ofMontana. `-r\--. DATED this

-a day ofJune, 2023.
7 1 / 7 ChiefJu



# / 06/27/2023

Case Number: PR 23-0232Justices
On appellant’s motion for reconsideration filed May 27,

reconsideration allowed; opinion (128 Or App 222, 875 P2d 499) modified and adhered to as modified July 13, 1994

#### Robert S. WAYT, *Respondent, v.*Donald G. BUERKEL, *Appellant, and*POWDER VALLEY WATER CONTROL DISTRICT, *Respondent.*

(CV 91-06-34255; CA A78430)

876 P2d 868

W. Eugene Hallman for motion.

No appearance *contra.*

Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Leeson, Judges.

De MUNIZ, J.

*121De MUNIZ, J.

Pursuant to ORAP 6.25, defendant moves for reconsideration of our opinion, *Wayt v. Buerkel,*128 Or App 222, 875 P2d 499 (1994), in which we held that there is a contract right to receive water that is appurtenant to property owned by plaintiff, but no easement for delivery of the water through defendant’s property to plaintiff’s property. Defendant requests that we delete footnote 6, 128 Or App at 233, from our opinion, because it contains a factual inaccuracy and is not necessary to the resolution of the case. We allow the motion and delete footnote 6.

Reconsideration allowed; opinion modified and adhered to as modified.
the revocation of parole may be raised in a petition for a writ of habeas

corpus under NRS 34.360. 

### See NRS 34.500; 

### Hornback v. Warden, 97 Nev. 98, 100, 625 P.2d 83, 84 (1981). A parole revocation proceeding involves the loss of liberty and thus necessitates certain procedural due process protections for the parolee. 

### Anaya v. State, 96 Nev. 119, 122, 606 P.2d 156, 157-58 (1980). Due process for parole revocation hearings requires, at a minimum, that "the finding of a parole violation will be based on verified facts and that the exercise of discretion will be informed by an accurate knowledge of the parolee's behavior." 

### Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 484 (1972); 

### see also Anaya, 96 Nev. at 122, 606 P.2d at 157-58 (citing 

### Morrissey and setting out the minimum procedures necessary to revoke parole); NRS 213.1513; NRS 213.1517.

Because the district court did not consider whether appellant was afforded the due process protections delineated in 

### Morrissey, we reverse and remand for the district court to resolve the allegations set forth in appellant's habeas petition. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court REVERSED AND REMAND this matter to the district court for proceedings consistent with this order. 2

2 Given our resolution of this appeal, we deny the proper person motions received on June 28, 2012, and February 21, 2013, as moot.

2

### cc: Hon. Richard Wagner, District Judge Shade W. Hall Attorney General/Carson City Pershing County Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 

### 3
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4820 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4820

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
               coastwise trade for the vessel LADY HELEN.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 22, 1994

 Mr. Moakley introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
               coastwise trade for the vessel LADY HELEN.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the 
Act of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106 of title 
46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue a 
certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for 
employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel LADY HELEN (United 
States official number 527746).
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 163 (Wednesday, August 23, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49464-49465]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7085]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.


[[Page 49465]]


    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel, Reproductive Hormones and the Brain I.
    Date: September 6, 2006.
    Time: 11 a.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20814, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Bita Nakhai, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Office, National Institute on 
Aging, Gateway Bldg., 2C212, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 
20814, 301-402-7701, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2a444b41424b43486a44434b04444342044d455c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7719161c1f161e1537191e1659191e1f59101801">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel, Genes Responsible for Prolonged Existence I.
    Date: September 21, 2006.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20817, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Bita Nakhai, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Office, National Institute on 
Aging, Gateway Bldg., 2C212, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 
20814, 301-402-7701, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d5bbb4bebdb4bcb795bbbcb4fbbbbcbdfbb2baa3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ee808f85868f878cae80878fc0808786c0898198">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 15, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-7085 Filed 8-22-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 27.1170 Payment issues.

Prior to initiating operations for a newly constructed site or modified existing site, an AWS entity is required to file a notice containing site-specific data with the clearinghouse. The notice regarding the new or modified site must provide a detailed description of the proposed site's spectral frequency use and geographic location, including but not limited to the applicant's name and address, the name of the transmitting base station, the geographic coordinates corresponding to that base station, the frequencies and polarizations to be added, changed or deleted, and the emission designator. If a prior coordination notice (PCN) under § 101.103(d) of this chapter is prepared, AWS entities can satisfy the site-data filing requirement by submitting a copy of their PCN to the clearinghouse. AWS entities that file either a notice or a PCN have a continuing duty to maintain the accuracy of the site-specific data on file with the clearinghouse. Utilizing the site-specific data, the clearinghouse will determine if any reimbursement obligation exists and notify the AWS entity in writing of its repayment obligation, if any. When the AWS entity receives a written copy of such obligation, it must pay directly to the relocator the amount owed within 30 calendar days.

[78 FR 8271, Jan. 5, 2013]
#### § 68.414 Hearing aid-compatibility: Enforcement.

Enforcement of §§ 68.4 and 68.112 is hereby delegated to those states which adopt those sections and provide for their enforcement. The procedures followed by a state to enforce those sections shall provide a 30-day period after a complaint is filed, during which time state personnel shall attempt to resolve a dispute on an informal basis. If a state has not adopted or incorporated §§ 68.4 and 68.112, or failed to act within 6 months from the filing of a complaint with the state public utility commission, the Commission will accept such complaints. A written notification to the complainant that the state believes action is unwarranted is not a failure to act.

[49 FR 1368, Jan. 11, 1984]
§ 73.623 TV application processing. ( a ) *General.* Applications for new TV broadcast stations or for changes in authorized TV stations filed pursuant to this section will not be accepted for filing if they fail to comply with the requirements of this section and §§ 73.614, 73.617, 73.618, and 73.620.
( b ) *Availability of channels.* Applications may be filed to construct TV broadcast stations only on the channels designated in the Table of TV Allotments set forth in § 73.622(j), and only in the communities listed therein. Applications that fail to comply with this requirement, whether or not accompanied by a petition to amend the TV Table, will not be accepted for filing.
( c ) through ( g ) [Reserved]
( h ) *TV application processing priorities are as follows:* ( 1 ) [Reserved]
( 2 ) TV applications for a construction permit or a modified construction permit: ( i ) Shall be afforded the interference protection set forth in § 73.620: ( A ) through ( C ) [Reserved]
( D ) By later-filed TV applications; and
( E ) By later-filed rulemaking petitions to amend the Table of TV Allotments;
( ii ) Must demonstrate the requisite interference protection set forth in § 73.620 to: ( A ) TV licensed stations;
( B ) TV construction permits;
( C ) Earlier-filed TV applications;
( D ) Existing TV allotments;
( E ) Rulemaking petitions to amend the Table of TV Allotments for which a Notice of Proposed Rule Making has been released and the comment deadline specified therein has passed prior to the filing date of the TV application;
( F ) through ( J ) [Reserved]
( iii ) That do not provide the requisite interference protection set forth § 73.620 to the following applications and petitions will be deemed mutually exclusive with those applications and petitions: ( A ) Other TV applications filed the same day;
( B ) Rulemaking petitions to amend the Table of TV Allotments for which a Notice of Proposed Rule Making had been released and the comment deadline specified therein had not passed prior to the filing date of the TV application; and
( C ) Earlier-filed rulemaking petitions to amend the Table of TV Allotments for which a Notice of Proposed Rule Making had not been released.
( 3 ) TV applicants and TV rulemaking petitioners that are mutually exclusive pursuant to this section will be notified by Public Notice and provided with a 90-day period of time to resolve their mutual exclusivity via engineering amendment or settlement. Those applications and petitions that remain mutually exclusive upon conclusion of the 90-day settlement period will be dismissed.
[89 FR 7248, Feb. 1, 2024]
§ 90.1203 Eligibility. ( a ) Entities providing public safety services (as defined in § 90.523) are eligible to hold a Commission license for systems operating in the 4940-4990 MHz band. All of the requirements and conditions set forth in § 90.523 also govern authorizations in the 4940-4990 MHz band.
( b ) 4.9 GHz band licensees may enter into sharing agreements or other arrangements for use of the spectrum with entities that do not meet the eligibility requirements in this section. However, all applications in the band are limited to operations in support of public safety.
[85 FR 76480, Nov. 30, 2020, as amended at 86 FR 59869, Oct. 28, 2021]
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4727 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 197

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4727

                          [Report No. 103-638]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

   To designate the Federal building located at 125 Market Street in 
    Youngstown, Ohio, as the ``Thomas D. Lambros Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             August 1, 1994

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                                 House Calendar No. 197
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4727

                          [Report No. 103-638]

   To designate the Federal building located at 125 Market Street in 
    Youngstown, Ohio, as the ``Thomas D. Lambros Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 12, 1994

Mr. Traficant  introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Public Works and Transportation

                             August 1, 1994

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To designate the Federal building located at 125 Market Street in 
    Youngstown, Ohio, as the ``Thomas D. Lambros Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 125 Market Street in Youngstown, 
Ohio, shall be known and designated as the ``Thomas D. Lambros Federal 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Thomas D. Lambros 
Federal Building''.
```
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-2797

___________ Wilburn A. Henderson, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas * Department of Corrections; Gregory D. * [UNPUBLISHED] Harmon, Warden, Tucker Maximum * Security Unit; John Does 1, 2, 3 and 4, * * Appellees. * *

___________ Submitted: July 8, 1998 Filed: July 8, 1998

___________ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Wilb urnHenderson, an Arkansas inmate under sentence of death, appeals th e district cour

t's dismissal of his claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He has also moved for a stay of execution pending appeal. Henderson claims that prison officials violated the Firs t, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments when they allegedly interfered wit h Henderson's communications with his attorneys. We have carefully reviewed th e submissions of the parties, including all of Henderson's allegations, and the opinion-2-

of the d istrict court, and find Henderson's claims to be meritless. Therefore, th e decision of the district court is affirmed and Henderso n's motion for a stay of execution is denied. A true copy. ATTEST: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4790 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 574
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4790

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               August 9 (legislative day, August 8), 1994

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

              August 12 (legislative day, August 11), 1994

               Reported by Mr. Baucus, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To designate the United States courthouse under construction in St. 
      Louis, Missouri, as the ``Thomas F. Eagleton United States 
                             Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse under construction at 111 South Tenth 
Street in St. Louis, Missouri, shall be known and designated as the 
``Thomas F. Eagleton United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Thomas F. 
Eagleton United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives August 8, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 574

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4790

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To designate the United States courthouse under construction in St. 
      Louis, Missouri, as the ``Thomas F. Eagleton United States 
                             Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

              August 12 (legislative day, August 11), 1994

                       Reported without amendment
```
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4416

To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to reauthorize the conservation

reserve program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 12, 1994

Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota (for himself and Mr. ROBERTS) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to reauthorize

the conservation reserve program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF CONSERVATION RE4 SERVE PROGRAM.

5 Chapter 1 of subtitle D of title XII of the Food Secu6 rity Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3830 et seq.) is amended by

7 striking ‘‘1995’’ each place it appears in section 1230(a),

8 subsections (a), (b)(3), and (d) of section 1231, and sec9 tion 1232(c) and inserting ‘‘2005’’.

Æ
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with this Quarterly Report of HIV-VAC Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the year period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin Murray, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the
         period ending June 30, 2009, fairly presents, in all material
         respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HIV-VAC
         Inc.

Date: September 30, 2011

/s/ Kevin Murray
Kevin Murray
Chief Financial Officer
§ 87.18 Station license required. ( a ) Except as noted in paragraph (b) of this section, stations in the aviation service must be licensed by the FCC either individually or by fleet.
( b ) An aircraft station is licensed by rule and does not need an individual license issued by the FCC if the aircraft station is not required by statute, treaty, or agreement to which the United States is signatory to carry a radio, and the aircraft station does not make international flights or communications. Even though an individual license is not required, an aircraft station licensed by rule must be operated in accordance with all applicable operating requirements, procedures, and technical specifications found in this part.
[61 FR 58011, Nov. 12, 1996]