alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on July 7, 2006, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), National Conference of Standards Laboratories (“NCSL”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: National Conference of Standards Laboratories, Boulder, CO. The nature and scope of NCSL's standards development activities are: To develop and maintain standards for the operation and design of calibration laboratories, requirements for the control and use of measuring and test equipment, and requirements or guides for metrological functions associated with calibration laboratories and/or measuring and test equipment. These standards may be new development projects or may be based upon current ISO/IEC standards or guides, other international standards, recommended practices developed by NCSL or other industry good practices.

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 06-6776 Filed 8-8-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

M.G.,

Petitioner

v.

L.D.,

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 148 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 149 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 12th day of May, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED. 

L.D. and C.B.D., 

Respondents v. Respondent M.G.,
No. 11-5202.

#### Lopez *v.*Martuscello, Superintendent, Coxsackie Correctional Facility.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 885/2005

of 10 June 2005         

supplementing the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2400/96 as regards the entry of a name in the ‘Register of protected designation of origin and protected geographical indications’ (Olive de Nice) — (PDO)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 of 14 July 1992 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin of agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 6(3) and (4) thereof.

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name listed in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby added to the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2400/96 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 June 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 208, 24.7.1992, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 806/2003 (OJ L 122, 16.5.2003, p. 1).

(2)OJ C 84, 3.4.2004, p. 12.

(3)OJ L 327, 18.12.1996, p. 11. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 737/2005 (OJ L 122, 14.5.2005, p. 15).

----

ANNEX

PRODUCTS LISTED IN ANNEX I TO THE TREATY INTENDED FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION:

Fresh or processed fruit, vegetables and cereals

FRANCE

Olive de Nice (PDO)

----
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. ERIC GLENN LANE

From Wayne County

No. 606A05-3

AMENDED ORDER

Defendant’s motion for an extension of thirty days to prepare the transcript on appeal is allowed.

As to defendant’s motion in the alternative to declare “that the one hundred twenty-five day deadline in N.C. R. App. P. 7(b)(1) for capitally tried cases applies in this procedural posture,” the State is directed to file a response within ten days from the date of this order.

By Order of this Court, this 18th day of November, 2015.

s/Ervin, J.

For the Court

WITNESS my hand and the seal of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, this the 18th day of March, 2016.

CHRISTIE S. CAMERON ROEDER Clerk of the Supreme Court

s/M.C. Hackney Assistant Clerk
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. MARVIN JACKSON, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 316 MAL 2015 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 7th day of July, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
###### Editorial Note on Part 36

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 74 FR 23956, May 22, 2009, 77 FR 30411, May 23, 2012, 82 FR 25538, June 2, 2017, and corrected at 83 FR 4153, Jan. 30, 2018. Nomenclature changes to part 36 also appear at 83 FR 63587, Dec. 11, 2018, and 84 FR 4360, Feb. 15, 2019.

#### § 36.182 Cash working capital.

(a) The amount for cash working capital, if not determined directly for a particular operation, is apportioned among the operations on the basis of total expenses less non-cash expense items.
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTH CI RCUI T APRI L 24, 2009 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [ D O N O T P U B L I S H ]

I N T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C I R C U I T

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ N o

. 0 8

- 1 1 3 5 3 N o n - A r g u m e n t C a l e n d a r

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ D

. C

. D o c k e t N o

. 0 7

- 0 0 0 5 9

- C R

- 3

- M C R

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A ,

P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e ,

v e r s u s

E R I C D A L E R O B I N S O N , a

. k

. a

. E R I C J R , D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ A p p e a l f r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e N o r t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f F l o r i d a

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ( A p r i l 2 4 , 2 0 0 9 )

B e f o r e C A R N E S , W I L S O N a n d P R Y O R , C i r c u i t J u d g e s

.
P E R C U R I A M :
C h e t K a u f

m a n , a p p o i n t e d c o u n s e l f o r E r i c D a l e R o b i n s o n i n t h i s a p p e a l , h a sm o v e d t o w i t h d r a w f r o m f u r t h e r r e p r e s e n t a t i o n o f t h e a p p e l l a n t a n d h a s f i l e d a
b r i e f p u r s u a n t t o A n d e r s v
. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 , 8 7 S

. C t

. 1 3 9 6 , 1 8 L

. E d

. 2 d

4 9 3 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e e n t i r e r e c o r d r e v e a l s t h a t c o u n s e l ’ s

a s s e s s m e n t o f t h e r e l a t i v e m e r i t o f t h e a p p e a l i s c o r r e c t

. B e c a u s e i n d e p e n d e n t

e x a m i n a t i o n o f t h e r e c o r d r e v e a l s n o a r g u a b l e i s s u e s o f m e r i t , c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n t o

w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , a n d R o b i n s o n ’ s c o n v i c t i o n a n d s e n t e n c e a r e
A F F I R M E D

.

2
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER



This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section
1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person for any other purpose.



The undersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer, respectively, of SciQuest, Inc. (the
Company), hereby each certify as follows:



The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company (the Report), which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated this 13th day of May, 2004



/s/ Stephen J. WieheStephen J. Wiehe, Chief Executive Officer/s/ David R. PoucherDavid R. Poucher, Principal Financial Officer
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2011-0199 SNPRM

Directorate ID: 2011-CE-005-AD

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

 NO COMMENTS RECEIVED – If this box is checked, no signatures are required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:

If NO, we don’t agree because 
Page 2 of 3

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Date

Branch Manager Date
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army; DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of Public Law 92-463, The Federal Advisory Committee Act, announcement is made of the following meeting:

*Name of Committee:*                             Armed Forces Epidemiological Board (AFEB).                        

*Dates:*                             September 26, 2006 (Open meeting); September 27, 2006 (Open meeting);                        

*Times:*                             8 a.m.-5 p.m. (September 26, 2006); 8 a.m.-5 p.m. (September 27, 2006).                        

*Location:*                             The United States Naval Academy, 121 Blake Road, Annapolis, MD 21402.                        

*Agenda:*                             The purpose of the meeting is to address pending and new Board issues, provide briefings for Board members on topics related to ongoing and new Board issues, conduct subcommittee meetings, and conduct an executive working session.                        

*For Further Information Contact:*                             Colonel Roger Gibson, Executive Secretary, Armed Forces Epidemiological Board, Skyline Six, 5109 Leesburg Pike, Room 682, Falls Church, VA 22041-3258, (703) 681-8012/3.                        

*Supplementary Information:*                             The entire sessions on September 26, 2006 and September 27, 2006 will be open to the public in accordance with Section 552b(b) of Title 5, U.S.C., specifically subparagraph (1) thereof and Title 5, U.S.C., appendix 1, subsection 10(d). Open sessions of the meeting will be limited by space accommodations. Any interested person may attend, appear before or file statements with the Board at the time and in the manner permitted by the Board.                        

Brenda S. Bowen, 

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 06-7008 Filed 8-17-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
#### § 69.608 Carrier Common Line hypothetical net balance.

The hypothetical net balance shall be equal to a Carrier Common Line revenue requirement for each such company that is computed in accordance with subpart F of this part.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND CHANGES IN MEMBER'S EQUITY, THE STATEMENT OF CASH
FLOWS, AND THE BALANCE SHEET FOR THE FORM 10-Q DATED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001083000
<NAME> PPL TRANSITION BOND CO, LLC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                            0
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          80,229
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        12,344
<OTHER-ASSETS>                               2,147,546
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,240,119
<COMMON>                                             0
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       12,101
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                284
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  12,385
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,978,649
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  236,859
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  12,226
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                2,240,119
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      301,424
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                56
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     180,019
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     180,075
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        121,349
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 136
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 121,485
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       121,405
<NET-INCOME>                                        80
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                       80
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         177,678
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
§ 52.34 Obligations regarding local number porting to and from interconnected VoIP or Internet-based TRS providers. ( a ) An interconnected VoIP or VRS or IP Relay provider must facilitate an end-user customer's or a Registered Internet-based TRS User's valid number portability request, as it is defined in this subpart, either to or from a telecommunications carrier or an interconnected VoIP or VRS or IP Relay provider. “Facilitate” is defined as the interconnected VoIP or VRS or IP Relay provider's affirmative legal obligation to take all steps necessary to initiate or allow a port-in or port-out itself or through the telecommunications carriers, if any, that it relies on to obtain numbering resources, subject to a valid port request, without unreasonable delay or unreasonable procedures that have the effect of delaying or denying porting of the NANP-based telephone number.
( b ) An interconnected VoIP or VRS or IP Relay provider may not enter into any agreement that would prohibit an end-user customer or a Registered Internet-based TRS User from porting between interconnected VoIP or VRS or IP Relay providers, or to or from a telecommunications carrier.
( c ) Telecommunications carriers must facilitate an end-user customer's valid number portability request either to or from an interconnected VoIP or VRS or IP Relay provider. “Facilitate” is defined as the telecommunication carrier's affirmative legal obligation to take all steps necessary to initiate or allow a port-in or port-out itself, subject to a valid port request, without unreasonable delay or unreasonable procedures that have the effect of delaying or denying porting of the NANP-based telephone number.
[73 FR 9481, Feb. 21, 2008, as amended at 73 FR 41294, July 18, 2008; 80 FR 66479, Oct. 29, 2015]
#### § 32.2110 Land and support assets.

This account shall be used by companies to record the original cost of land and support assets of the type and character detailed in Accounts 2111 through 2124.

[82 FR 20841, May 4, 2017]
Docket No. FAA-2012-1164

. Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? 

Organization Person Contacted Date Response 

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 4/11/12

Regional Airline Association 4/11/12

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 4/11/12

ATA M Lopez 4/11/12
No. 11-5451.

#### Jarvis *v.*Staples, Inc.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2

                        CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report MIV Therapeutics, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended November 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Patrick
McGowan, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.

/S/ PATRICK MCGOWAN
-------------------
Patrick McGowan
CFO
May 20, 2005
**CISWI Rule**

Summary of major changes

 Emission limit changes as a result of: o New data and revisions to the CI SWIinventory for ERUs (energy

recovery units) and waste - burning kilns o Data qualit y assurance checks o Review of dioxin/furan data and non - detect methodology  Subcategory

changes: o ERUs: PM and other CAA 129 metals now considered combustion - based pollutants for ERUs o Waste burning kilns: long kilns and preheater/precalciner kilns f urther subcategorized for CO  Monitoring changes: o Removal of ox ygen correction requirements for CO limits for ERUs during startup and shutdown and removal of CO CEMS requirements o Replacement of continuous particulate matter monitoring for ERUs greater than 250 MMBtu/hr design heat input capacit y with continuous parameter monitoring sy stem requirements  Definition changes: o Revised the definition of waste - burning kiln to exclude the use of ingredients o Reinstated the definition of contained gaseous material o Esta blished a definition of foundry sand thermal reclamation unit  Notice and comment issues: o In the March 21, 2011 notice, we identified seven issues affecting CISWI for which reconsideration should be granted and additional opportunity for public review and c omment should be given:  revision of the subcategory of energy

recovery units;  establishment of limitations on fuel switching provisions;  revision of the definition of CI SWIto exclude cyclonic burn barrels;  inclusion of an affirmative defense provision for malfunction events;  revisions to the carbon monoxide monitoring requirements;  establishment of a full - load stack test requirement for carbon monoxide coupled with continuous ox ygen monitoring for CISWI units; and,  establishment of a defi nition of “homogeneous waste” in the CI SWIrule.