alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Appendix E

Abstract Review Form

	Treatment of Coexisting Glaucoma and Cataract	Reviewer: _________

	Abstract Review Form	Data Entry: _________

Delete, because article (check one):

☐ did not include human data

☐ adults are not part of the study population

☐ not in English

☐ no original data

☐ does not address open angle glaucoma or primary

    angle closure glaucoma

☐ was neither a controlled trial nor a case series ≥

    100 eyes

☐ only addresses ICCE

☐ only addresses full thickness glaucoma surgery 

☐ meeting abstract

☐ other: (specify) ________________________

Do not go on if any item above is checked.	Study Topics

☐ Development of cataract after glaucoma surgery

☐ Acute control of IOP after cataract surgery, in glaucoma patients

☐ Long-term control of IOP after cataract surgery, in glaucoma

     patients

☐ Preferred surgical technique

☐ Article is a case series of 100 or more patients.

☐ This article does not apply to any above study questions.

	☐ However, get article for reference regarding:_________________

☐ Unclear: get article to decide

Any comments to be tagged:____________________________________

___________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2009 of Zap.Com Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for the periods presented
in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
    /s/ Philip A. FalconePhilip A. FalconeChairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
# University of Colorado, Colorado Springs

/ Published Nov. 27, 2023

Paper Info.
No. 10-10779.

#### Tilcock *v.*Smith, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
exv4w5



 





Exhibit 4.5




GOLDEN STAR RESOURCES LTD.




Amendment
No. 1 to 
$50,000,000 6.85% Senior Convertible Notes issued April 15, 2005



This Amendment No. 1 to the $50,000,000 6.85% Senior Convertible Notes issued by Golden Star
Resources Ltd. on April 15, 2005 is made by and among Golden Star Resources Ltd. and each of the
Holders listed below to amend certain terms of the Notes. Capitalized terms used but not
otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Notes.





	 	1.	 	The definition of “Permitted Acquisition Indebtedness” in Section 27(s) of each
Note is
hereby amended by inserting “or any of its Subsidiaries” after “Company” in the second
line of the definition.
	 
	 	2.	 	The definition of “Permitted Senior and Pari Passu Indebtedness” in Section 27(w)
is hereby amended by (i) inserting “or any of its Subsidiaries” after “Company” in the
second line of the definition and (ii) inserting “or guarantees of any Subsidiary” after
“guarantees” in clause (iii) of the definition.




Golden Star and the Holders further agree, for the avoidance of doubt, that the following credit
arrangements constitute Permitted Senior and Pari Passu Indebtedness: (i) Caterpillar
Financial Services Corporation Equipment Financing and (ii) EcoBank Ghana Ltd. Medium-Term
Loan.



Except as specifically modified by this Amendment, all other terms and conditions and obligations
of Golden Star Resources Ltd. and the Holders pursuant to the Notes remain in full force and
effect. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts. This Amendment is effective as of January
17, 2007.




GOLDEN STAR RESOURCES LTD.




	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Roger Palmer
 

	 	 
	Roger Palmer	 	 
	Interim Chief Financial Officer	 	 
	Golden Star Resources Ltd	 	 





Agreed as of this 29 day of January, 2007. The undersigned represents that as of this date, it is
the Holder of $ 12,500,000 principal amount of the Notes.




	 	 	 	 	 
	By: 

Name:

	 	/s/ John MacDonald
 

John MacDonald
	 	 
	Company:

	 	Deutech Bank Securities Ltd.	 	 
	Title:

	 	VP Global Prime Services
V

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4733

To authorize issuance of a certificate of documentation with appropriate

endorsement for the vessel RAVEN.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 12, 1994

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To authorize issuance of a certificate of documentation with

appropriate endorsement for the vessel RAVEN.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1.—Notwithstanding section 27 of the Mer4 chant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the Act

5 of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and sections

6 12106, 12107, and 12108 of title 46, United States Code,

7 as applicable on the date of enactment of this Act, the

8 Secretary of Transportation may issue a certificate of doc9 umentation with appropriate endorsement of the vessel

10 RAVEN, United States official number 671703.
2

HR 4733 IH

Æ
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.90


TESORO LOGISTICS LP
NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PROGRAM 




On January 17, 2017, the Board of Directors of our general partner adopted changes to the director compensation program under which our general partner’s non-employee directors are compensated for their service as directors.  The changes to the compensation program were made effective as of January 1, 2017.  Each non-employee director receives a compensation package consisting of an annual retainer, an additional retainer for service as the chair of a standing committee and meeting attendance fees and may also receive grants of equity-based awards upon appointment to the Board of Directors.  
 
	
			
	Non-Employee Director Annual Retainers and Fees (a)

	Annual Retainer (b)
	$  142,000
	


	Annual Retainer for Audit and Conflicts Committee Chairs
	15,000
	


	Board and Committee Meeting Fees (c)
	1,500 per meeting
	







		
	(a)
	In addition to the retainers set forth above, we reimburse our non-employee directors for travel and lodging expenses that they incur in connection with attending meetings of the board of directors or its committees.




		
	(b)
	The annual retainer is payable $61,000 in cash and $81,000 in an award of service phantom units. Unit-based awards granted to non-employee directors under the annual compensation package or upon first election to the board of directors under our long-term incentive plan, generally vest one year from the date of grant. If the non-employee director termination from the board is due to death or disability, director’s service phantom units will automatically vest along with any accrued cash distribution equivalent rights. If termination is due to any other reason, the non-employee director will receive a pro-rated award for the number of full months served as a non-employee director during the vesting period along with any accrued cash distribution equivalent rights. The pro-rated award will vest one year from the date of grant. Cash distribution equivalent rights accrue with respect to equity-based awards and are distributed at the time such awards vest. The number of units granted will be determined by dividing $81,000 by the average closing price of our common units on the NYSE over a ten business-day period ending on the third business day prior to the grant date and rounding any resulting fractional units to the nearest whole unit. The plan provides that unit-based awards to directors will be granted annually in conjunction with the Board's approval of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, and that any new non-employee director will receive a pro rata award of service phantom units when commencing his or her services as a board member. 




		
	(c)
	A meeting fee is paid to a non-employee director for attendance in person or by telephone.
No. 11-6006.

#### Flores-Vasquez *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**EXHIBIT
          32.2**
  **CERTIFICATION
          PURSUANT TO**
 **18
          U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
          ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
  SECTION
          906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
          connection with the Quarterly Report of NetFabric Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”)
          on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
          and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Vasan Thatham,
          Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
          adopted
          pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
          The
          Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
          the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
          The
          information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
          the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  May
          14,
          2007


/s/ Vasan
                ThathamName: Vasan ThathamTitle:
                    Chief Financial Officer
  A
        signed original of this written statement required by
        Section 906 has been provided to NetFabric Holdings, Inc. and will be retained
        by NetFabric Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
        Commission or its staff upon request.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4637

To assure compliance with the guarantees of the 5th, 14th, and 15th amendments to the Constitution by prohibiting the intentional creation of

legislative districts which favor or discriminate against individuals based

on the race, color, national origin, or language of voters within such

districts.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 23, 1994

Mr. BONILLA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To assure compliance with the guarantees of the 5th, 14th,

and 15th amendments to the Constitution by prohibiting

the intentional creation of legislative districts which favor

or discriminate against individuals based on the race,

color, national origin, or language of voters within such

districts.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION.

4 It shall be unlawful for any State or political subdivi5 sion, in the establishment of districts for the election of

6 members to any Federal, State, or local multi-member
2

•HR 4637 IH

1 body with legislative functions, to create any such district

2 with the intent to prevent or assure that a majority in

3 that district are people of a particular race, color, or na4 tional origin, or who speak a particular language.

5 SEC. 2. CIVIL ACTION.

6 Any person who is aggrieved by a violation of section

7 1 may, in a civil action, obtain appropriate relief.

Æ
§ 53.213 Audit analysis and evaluation. ( a ) Within 60 dates after the end of the audit period, but prior to discussing the audit findings with the Bell operating company or the separate affiliate, the independent auditor shall submit a draft of the audit report to the Federal/State joint audit team. ( 1 ) The Federal/State joint audit team shall have 45 days to review the audit findings and audit workpapers, and offer its recommendations concerning the conduct of the audit or the audit findings to the independent auditor. Exceptions of the Federal/State joint audit team to the finding and conclusions of the independent auditor that remain unresolved shall be included in the final audit report.
( 2 ) Within 15 days after receiving the Federal/State joint audit team's recommendations and making appropriate revisions to the audit report, the independent auditor shall submit the audit report to the Bell operating company for its response to the audit findings and send a copy to the Federal/State joint audit team. The independent auditor may request additional time to perform additional audit work as recommended by the Federal/State joint audit team.
( b ) Within 30 days after receiving the audit report, the Bell operating company will respond to the audit findings and send a copy of its response to the Federal/State joint audit team. The Bell operating company's response shall be included as part of the final audit report along with any reply that the independent auditor wishes to make to the response.
( c ) Within 10 days after receiving the response of the Bell operating company, the independent auditor shall make available for public inspection the final audit report by filing it with the Commission and the state regulatory agencies participating on the joint audit team.
( d ) Interested parties may file comments with the Commission within 60 days after the audit report is made available for public inspection.
[62 FR 2927, Jan. 21, 1997]
EXHIBIT 21

                            SUBSIDIARIES OF DYNACARE
                                                                  MARCH 12, 2001
A/       CANADIAN OPERATIONS(1):

         Dynacare Gamma Institutional Laboratory Services Limited
         Dynacare-Gamma Laboratory Partnership
         Dynacare Kasper Medical Laboratories
         Dynacare Kasper Medical Laboratories (Northern Alberta) Inc.
         Dynacare G.P. Inc.
         Dynacare International Inc.
         Dynacare Laboratories Limited Partnership
         Dynacare Realty Inc.
         Dynacare X-ray Services Limited
         ExecMed Health Services Inc.
         The Dynacare Health Group Inc.
         Ultra-Med Development Inc.
         GDML Leaseco Inc.
         Gamma-Dynacare Leasing Corporation

         896988 Ontario Limited
         3033331 Nova Scotia Company

B/       US OPERATIONS(1)

         Dynacare Laboratories Inc.
         Dynacare Laboratory Management Inc.
         Dynacare Laboratories Investments Inc.
         Dynacare Northwest Inc.
         SVL Inc.
         Dynacare Mississippi Inc.
         Dynacare Southwest Laboratories Inc. (Delaware)
         Dynacare Texas LP, Inc.
         Dynacare Texas Shareholder, Inc.
         Clinical Laboratories Cheyenne
         Dynacare Texas Laboratories, Inc.
         HHD GenPar, Inc.
         HH/DL, L.P.
         DL/ELLIS, L.L.C.
         United/Dynacare L.L.C.
         Dynacare Louisiana Inc.
         Dynacare Louisiana, L.L.C.
         HT/DL LP
         SW/DL LP
         DL/UHS Inc.
         LabSouth, Inc.
         Dynacare Financing G.P.
         Dynacare Delaware Financing LLC
         UHS/DL, L.P.
         Dynacare/WPAHS L.L.C.

-------------------------
(1) Excludes legal entities with inactive business operations
No. 11-9477.

#### Satterfield *v.*Johnson et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. .
Evidence Table 11.  Does trabeculectomy combined with cataract surgery or another operation combined with cataract surgery lower intraocular pressure more?

											Outcomes/Benefits

Study design: Randomized controlled trials

Gayton, Van der Karr, Sanders, 1999

United States

Followup: Not Reported

Quality: 50%

	1	29	0.48	NR	NR	Angle:  

Power: Can't Tell	Phaco.

Clear cornea

1-site	NR	16	-7.30	NR	NR	NR	1.40	15

	2	29	0.31	NR	Can't Tell		Phaco.

2-site	NR	13	-10.60	NR	NR	NR	0.07	7

Gianoli, Schnyder, Bovey et al., 1999

Europe

Followup: 12 to 23 months

Quality: 59%	1	30	NR	0	NR		Phaco.

Clear cornea

2-site	NR	NR	-10.9	NR	NR	NR	0.6	NR

	2	30	NR	0	Can't Tell		Phaco.

Scleral

1-site	NR	NR	-9.9	NR	NR	NR	0.6	NR

Study design: Cohort studies

Kendrick, Kollarits, Khan, 1996

United States

Followup: Not Reported

Quality: 20%

	1	51	NR	NR	NR		Phaco.

Scleral	NR	51	-5.20	NR	NR	NR	0.60	10

	2	19	NR	NR	Limbus		Phaco. 

Scleral	NR	19	-2.30	NR	NR	NR	0.40	5
June 7, 2013

Mr. Thomas H. Miller

Gama Charters, Inc.

700 Great Meadow Road

Sikorsky Memorial Airport

Stratford, CT 06497

Dear Mr. Miller:

This is in response to your March 11, 2013 letter (public docket No. FAA-2011-0330) 

petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration on behalf of Gama Charters, Inc. (Gama 

Charters) for an exemption from § 135.225(f) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations

(CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Gama Charters to make instrument flight 

rules (IFR) takeoffs from foreign and military airports when the visibility is less than 1 statute 

mile or make an instrument approach when the visibility is less than 1⁄2 mile.

On January 11, 2012, the FAA amended 14 CFR § 135.225(f) relating to takeoff, approach,

and landing minimums (77 FR 1629). A copy of this rule change is enclosed for your 

information.

Because the relief you seek is now covered under the current rule, we will take no further 

action on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/

Ida M. Klepper

Manager, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Apprentice S 15e Checklists

Mission Planning

 Flight paths – Recorded

 Lost communication – Return to home

 Low battery – Return to home

 Mission plans – Shared with personnel and property owner

Flight Planning

 Check distance to nearest airport

 Contact airport/control tower if necessary

 Check weather for day of flight

 Check for hazards to aircraft

 Gain property owners permission

 Contact local law enforcement if necessary

 Flight routes - Planned and recorded to aircraft

 Batteries – Charged

 Transmitter – Charged

 Camera - Charged

 Micro SD – Cleared

 Generator – Fueled

Preflight

 Structural Damage – None

 Control Surfaces - Secure

 Wires – Undamaged and securely connected

 Wings – Securely Attached

 Propellers – Free of damage

 Propeller Nut – Locked

 Motors – Secured 

 Landing gear – Undamaged

 Gimbal – Secure

 Camera - Secure

 Camera Lens - Clean

 Sustained Wind – Less than 20mph

 Gusts - Less than 30mph

 Precipitation – None

 Visibility – Greater than 2 miles
 Kp Index – Less than 5

 ATC - Notified

 Ground Control Station – On

 Transmitter Controls – Move Freely

 Transmitter Throttle - Zeroed

 Transmitter Switches – Full forward

 Transmitter – On

 Camera - On

 UAV – On level surface

 UAV Power – Battery Plugged In

 Aircraft Tones – Correct

 Telemetry - Connected

 UAV Compass – Calibrated

 GPS Satellites – More than 9

 UAV GPS – Calibrated

 Voltage – 14.9V

 UAV – Placed on Takeoff point

 Home location – Recorded

 Video Recording – On

 Safety Switch – Armed

 Arm Flight Controller – CLEAR!

 Takeoff - Airborne

After Take-Off

 Climb – to 200ft AGL

 Controls – Working normally

 Mission – Starting planned flight

Post Mission

 Landing Zone – CLEAR LZ!

 Land – On the ground

Post Landing

 Aircraft – Unarmed

 Safety Switch – Unarmed

 Flight Time – Logged

 UAV Voltage - Logged

 Video Recording – Off

 Telemetry – Disconnected
 UAV Battery – Unplugged

 ATC – Notified of completed operation
No. 11-1060.

#### Persfull *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit
32.2





Certification
of Chief Financial Officer of


Commercial
National Financial Corporation


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Commercial National Financial
Corporation (the “Corporation”) for the period ending December 31, 2008 (the
“Report”), I, Thomas D. Watters, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Commercial
      National Financial Corporation.








/s/
      Thomas D.WattersThomas
      D. WattersChief
      Financial OfficerMarch
      17, 2009








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Commercial National Financial Corporation and will be retained by Commercial
National Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 11-9649.

#### Wilson *v.*Rednour, Warden.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

J.S., the Father,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN and FAMILIES,

GUARDIAN AD LITEM PROGRAM and K.S., a minor,

Appellees.

No. 4D19-1829

[October 18, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Alberto Ribas, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case No. 2016-4863CJ 

DP.

Sean Conway, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carolyn Schwarz, 

Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee Department of 

Children and Families.

Marynelle Hardee, Gainesville, and Thomasina F. Moore, Tallahassee, 

for Appellee Guardian ad Litem Program.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
From: <michael.schon@bakerbotts.com>

To: Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 11/08/2010 04:22 PM

Subject: Petition for Reconsideration and Stay of the Portland Cement NESHAP and NSPS Rules

Dear Mr. Barnett,

Attached please find one copy of the Petition for Reconsideration and Stay of the National Emissions 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry and Standards of 

Performance for Portland Cement Plants, 75 Fed. Reg. 54,970 (Sept. 9, 2010) that were submitted to 

Administrator Jackson on behalf of Eagle Materials Inc. A paper copy is being sent to you via Fed 

Ex as well. 

thanks,

Michael Schon

BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.

The Warner

1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20004

Direct: 202.639.7707

Mobile: 202.436.4811 

Fax: 202.585.4066

michael.schon@bakerbotts.com

<<Petition for Recon and Stay (2).pdf>>
N ATIONAL OCEANIC AND A TMOSPHERIC A DMINISTRATION 

# Historical Hurricane Tracks United States Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | National Ocean Service Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Link Disclaimer | USA.gov 

## Page 1 of 1 #app=1834&3e3d- selectedIndex=2

12/9/2011 http://csc.noaa.gov/hurricanes/
###### Editorial Note on Part 74

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 74 appear at 64 FR 4055, Jan. 27, 1999.

#### § 74.761 [Reserved]