Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 165 / Friday, August 25, 2006 / Notices 50497 

216 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(3). 217 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 

competition among brokers and dealers, 

among exchange markets, and between 

exchange markets and markets other 

than exchange markets; (iii) the 

availability to brokers, dealers, and 

investors of information with respects to 

quotations for and transactions in 

securities; (iv) the practicability of 

brokers executing investors’ orders in 

the best market; and (v) an opportunity, 

consistent with the provisions with (i) 

and (ii) above, for investors’ orders to be 

executed without the participant of a 

dealer. 

The Exchange believes that the 

proposed rule change also furthers the 

objectives of Section 6(b)(3) under the 

Act 216 in that it provides a fair 

representation on the BCC of persons 

using XLE, in that Phlx By-law Article 

X, Section 10–11 is being amended such 

that the current ‘‘equity member’’ would 

be replaced by a member or a person 

associated with a member organization 

whose business is principally carried 

out on XLE. 

B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement on Burden on Competition 

The Exchange does not believe that 

the proposed rule change will impose 

any burden on competition not 

necessary or appropriate in furtherance 

of the purposes of the Act. 

C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement on Comments on the 

Proposed Rule Change Received From 

Members, Participants, or Others 

No written comments were either 

solicited or received by the Exchange. 

III. Date of Effectiveness of the 

Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 

Commission Action 

Within 35 days of the date of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register or within such longer period (i) 

As the Commission may designate up to 

90 days of such date if it finds such 

longer period to be appropriate and 

publishes its reasons for so finding or 

(ii) as to which the Exchange consents, 

the Commission will: 

(A) By order approve such proposed 

rule change, or 

(B) institute proceedings to determine 

whether the proposed rule change 

should be disapproved. 

IV. Solicitation of Comments 

Interested persons are invited to 

submit written data, views, and 

arguments concerning the foregoing, 

including whether the proposed rule 

change is consistent with the Act. 

Comments may be submitted by any of 

the following methods: 

Electronic Comments 

• Use the Commission’s Internet 

comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ 

rules/sro.shtml); or 

• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File 

Number SR–Phlx–2006–43 on the 

subject line. 

Paper Comments 

• Send paper comments in triplicate 

to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary, 

Securities and Exchange Commission, 

100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 

20549–1090. 

All submissions should refer to File 

Number SR–Phlx–2006–43. This file 

number should be included on the 

subject line if e-mail is used. To help the 

Commission process and review your 

comments more efficiently, please use 

only one method. The Commission will 

post all comments on the Commission’s 

Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ 

rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the 

submission, all subsequent 

amendments, all written statements 

with respect to the proposed rule 

change that are filed with the 

Commission, and all written 

communications relating to the 

proposed rule change between the 

Commission and any person, other than 

those that may be withheld from the 

public in accordance with the 

provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be 

available for inspection and copying in 

the Commission’s Public Reference 

Room. Copies of the filing also will be 

available for inspection and copying at 

the principal office of the Phlx. All 

comments received will be posted 

without change; the Commission does 

not edit personal identifying 

information from submissions. You 

should submit only information that 

you wish to make available publicly. All 

submissions should refer to File 

Number SR–Phlx–2006–43 and should 

be submitted on or before September 15, 

2006. 

For the Commission, by the Division of 

Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated 

authority.217

Nancy M. Morris, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 06–7131 Filed 8–24–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8010–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Notice of Availability of the Record of 

Decision for the Final Environmental 

Impact Statement, St. George 

Replacement Airport, St. George, 

Washington County, UT 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration, DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of availability of a record 

of decision. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) has completed 

and is making publicly available its 

Record of Decision (ROD) for the Final 

Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) 

containing a DOT Section 4(f)/303(c) 

Evaluation of a Proposed Replacement 

Airport for the City of St. George, Utah, 

Washington County, Utah. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

T.J. Stetz, Regional Environmental 

Protection Specialist, Federal Aviation 

Administration, Northwest Mountain 

Region, Airports Division, 1601 Lind 

Avenue, SW., Suite 315, Renton, 

Washington 98057–3356; telephone: 

(425) 227–2611; FAX: (425) 227–1600; 

and E-mail: TJ.Stetz@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA 

has completed and is making publicly 

available its Record of Decision for the 

proposed replacement airport at St. 

George, Utah. The FAA has published a 

Notice of Availability of the FEIS in the 

Federal Register on May 12, 2006. The 

FAA prepared the FEIS pursuant to the 

National Environmental Policy Act of 

1969. The FEIS assesses the potential 

impact of the proposed replacement 

airport, as well as the ‘‘No Action 

Alternative’’ of not constructing a new 

airport. The FAA accepted comments on 

the FEIS and prepared responses to the 

comments, both of which are included 

in an appendix to the ROD. 

The FAA selected the proposed 

replacement airport as the preferred 

alternative in meeting the purpose and 

need for improvements for St. George. 

The proposed replacement airport 

alternative includes the following 

federal actions: Construction and 

operation of a new 9,300-foot runway 

(01/19), and all support facilities (i.e., 

taxiways and associated lighting; a 

passenger terminal, apron, and 

associated parking; an aircraft rescue 

and fire-fighting (ARFF) facility; 

facilities for a fixed-base operator, 

general and corporate aviation, and air 

cargo; fuel farm facilities; airport 

maintenance facilities; and airport 

access to the Southern Corridor 

Highway). Also included in the 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
50498 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 165 / Friday, August 25, 2006 / Notices 

installation of navigational aids, 

airspace use, and approach and 

departure procedures. 

Copies of the ROD will be available 

for public review during normal 

business hours at the following 

locations: 

1. FAA Northwest Mountain Region 

Headquarters, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., 

Suite 315, Renton, WA 98057–3356, 

(425) 227–2611. 

2. FAA, Denver Airports District 

Office, 26805 East 68th Avenue, Suite 

224, Denver, CO 80249–6361, (303) 

342–1252. 

3. St. George Municipal Building, 175 

East 200 North, St. George, UT 84770, 

(435) 634–5800. 

4. St. George Airport, 620 S. Airport 

Road, St. George, UT 84770, (435) 634–

5822. 

5. Zion National Park Headquarters, 

Springdale, UT 84767–1099. 

6. Cedar City Library, 303 North 100 

East, Cedar City, UT 84720. 

7. Hurricane Valley Branch, 36 South 

300 West, Huyrricane, UT 84737. 

8. Santa Clara Branch, 1099 North 

Lava Flow Drive, St. George, UT 84770. 

9. Springdale Branch, 898 Zion Park 

Blvd, Springdale, UT 84767–0509. 

10. Washington County, 50 South 

Main, St. George, UT 84770. 

11. Salt Lake City—Main Library, 210 

E 400 S., Salt Lake City, UT 84111. 

12. Kanab City Library—374 N. Main 

Street, Kanab, UT 84741. 

13. Las Vegas—Main Branch, 2300 

Civic Center Drive, North Las Vegas, NV 

89030. 

14. Los Angeles County Library—

Main Branch, 12700 Grevillea Avenue, 

Hawthorne, CA 90250. 

15. Flagstaff Coconino County—Main 

Library, 300 W. Aspen Avenue, 

Flagstaff, AZ 86001. 

An electronic copy of the ROD will be 

available on the project Web site at: 

http://www.airportsites.net/squ-eis, 

beginning August 21, 2006. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 

21, 2006. 

Lowell H. Johnson, 

Manager, Airports Division, Northwest 

Mountain Region. 

[FR Doc. 06–7141 Filed 8–24–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

[Summary Notice No. PE–2006–28] 

Petitions for Exemption; Summary of 

Petitions Received 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of petitions for 

exemption received. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to FAA’s rulemaking 

provisions governing the application, 

processing, and disposition of petitions 

for exemption part 11 of Title 14, Code 

of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), this 

notice contains a summary of certain 

petitions seeking relief from specified 

requirements of 14 CFR. The purpose of 

this notice is to improve the public’s 

awareness of, and participation in, this 

aspect of FAA’s regulatory activities. 

Neither publication of this notice nor 

the inclusion or omission of information 

in the summary is intended to affect the 

legal status of any petition or its final 

disposition. 

DATES: Comments on petitions received 

must identify the petition docket 

number involved and must be received 

on or before September 14, 2006. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

[identified by DOT DMS Docket Number 

FAA–2001–11080 and FAA–2006–

24521] by any of the following methods: 

• Web Site: http://dms.dot.gov. 

Follow the instructions for submitting 

comments on the DOT electronic docket 

site. 

• Fax: 1–202–493–2251. 

• Mail: Docket Management Facility; 

U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 

Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, 

Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590–

001. 

• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on 

the plaza level of the Nassif Building, 

400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, 

DC, between 9 am and 5 pm, Monday 

through Friday, except Federal 

Holidays. 

Docket: For access to the docket to 

read background documents or 

comments received, go to http:// 

dms.dot.gov at any time or to Room PL–

401 on the plaza level of the Nassif 

Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., 

Washington, DC, between 9 am and 5 

pm, Monday through Friday, except 

Federal Holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

Linsenmeyer (202) 267–5174 or Sue 

Lender (202) 267–8029, Office of 

Rulemaking (ARM–1), Federal Aviation 

Administration, 800 Independence 

Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591. 

This notice is published pursuant to 

14 CFR 11.85 and 11.91. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on August 16, 

2005. 

Anthony F. Fazio, 

Director, Office of Rulemaking. 

Petitions for Exemption 

Docket No.: FAA–2001–11080. 

Petitioner: Experimental Aircraft 

Association, Inc. 

Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

91.319(h). 

Description of Relief Sought: To 

extend the scope of Exemption No. 

7162, as amended, to use aircraft 

certificated under § 21.191(i) for flight 

training and flight reviews, and to 

authorize Mr. Charles Burgoon to 

conduct weight-shift-control (WSC) 

flight training and practical tests in 

N394GS, an aircraft certificated as a 

fixed-wing aircraft. 

Docket No.: FAA–2006–24521. 

Petitioner: Aero Sports Connection. 

Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

21.190(b), 21.191(i)(1), 21.191(i)(2)(iii), 

21.191(i)(3), and 61.303(b). 

Description of Relief Sought: To allow 

certification of certain lighter-than-air 

aircraft as light-sport aircraft. The 

petitioner proposes a ‘‘communitywide’’ exemption to operate these 

aircraft at weights that are higher than 

those allowed for lighter-than-air 

aircraft certificated as light-sport 

aircraft. 

[FR Doc. E6–14130 Filed 8–24–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Railroad Administration 

Petition for Waiver of Compliance 

In accordance with Part 211 of Title 

49 of the Code of Federal Regulations 

(CFR), notice is hereby given that the 

Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) 

received a request for a waiver of 

compliance with certain requirements of 

its safety standards. The individual 

petition is described below, including 

the party seeking relief, the regulatory 

provisions involved, the nature of the 

relief being requested, and the 

petitioner’s arguments in favor of relief. 

City of Placentia, California, 

[Docket Number FRA–2006–24654] 

The City of Placentia, California (City) 

and BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) 

have petitioned for an extension to the 

waiver granted on June 21, 2006 in FRA 

Docket No. FRA–2006–24654. In the 

June 21, 2006 waiver, FRA agreed to 

extend the original deadline of June 24, 

2006 set forth in 49 CFR 222.42 for 

continuation of an intermediate partial 

quiet zone until September 22, 2006. In 

this current request, the City and BNSF 

state that they are working towards 

establishment of a 24-hour new quiet 

zone, but they will be unable to meet 

the September 22, 2006 deadline due to 

technical problems with the radio 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES