alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 166 (Monday, August 28, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 50931]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7170]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel, Medical Imaging BRP.
    Date: September 15, 2006.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agency: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Xiang-Ning Li, MD, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5112, MSC 7854, Bethesda, MD 
20892. 301-435-1744. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#94f8fdecfdf5faf3d4f7e7e6bafafdfcbaf3fbe2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dab6b3a2b3bbb4bd9ab9a9a8f4b4b3b2f4bdb5ac">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93,837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 17, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-7170 Filed 8-25-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4786

To convert into a requirement the option of States to deny aid to families

with dependent children to unmarried minors not living at home or

under adult supervision, and narrow the exceptions to the requirement,

and to deem to a minor parent all income of the minor’s parents who

are living in the same home as the minor parent.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 19, 1994

Mr. PETRI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To convert into a requirement the option of States to deny

aid to families with dependent children to unmarried

minors not living at home or under adult supervision,

and narrow the exceptions to the requirement, and to

deem to a minor parent all income of the minor’s parents

who are living in the same home as the minor parent.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4786 IH

1 SECTION 1. STATES REQUIRED TO DENY AID TO FAMILIES

2 WITH DEPENDENT CHILDREN TO UNMAR3 RIED MINORS NOT LIVING AT HOME OR

4 UNDER ADULT SUPERVISION; EXCEPTIONS

5 NARROWED.

6 Section 402(a)(43) of the Social Security Act (42

7 U.S.C. 602(a)(43)) is amended—

8 (1) by striking ‘‘at the option of the State,’’;

9 and

10 (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking clause (ii)

11 and redesignating clauses (iii), (iv), and (v) as

12 clauses (ii), (iii), and (iv), respectively.

13 SEC. 2. INCOME OF MINOR PARENT DEEMED TO INCLUDE

14 ALL INCOME OF MINOR’S PARENTS WHO ARE

15 LIVING IN THE SAME HOME AS THE MINOR

16 PARENT.

17 Section 402(a)(39) of the Social Security Act (42

18 U.S.C. 602(a)(39)) is amended by striking ‘‘, to the same

19 extent that the income of a stepparent is included under

20 paragraph (31)’’.

21 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

22 The amendments made by this Act shall apply to aid

23 payable for months beginning after the calendar month

24 in which this Act is enacted

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6307

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BOBBY BLAINE RASNAKE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge.

(CR-93-22)

Submitted: September 5, 1996 Decided: September 17, 1996

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bobby Blaine Rasnake, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Randall Ramseyer,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

motion for a reduction of his sentence. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United

States v. Rasnake, No. CR-93-22 (W.D. Va. Jan. 11, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Consent to transfer letter dated April 7, 2006




 Exhibit 4.6 
 NATCO Group Inc. 
 D3 Family Fund, L.P. 
 D3 Family Bulldog Fund, L.P. 
 D3 Family Retirement Fund, L.P. 
 D3 Children’s Fund, L.P. 
 D3 Offshore Fund, L.P. 
 c/o Nierenberg Investment Management Company 
 19605 NE 8th Street 
 Camas, WA 98607 
 Attn: Henry Hooper 
 Forest Global Convertible Fund, Ltd. 
 c/o Forest Investment Management LLC 
 53 Forest Avenue 
 Old Greenwich, CT 06870 
 Attn: Larry Diamond 
 EGI-Fund (05-07) Investors, L.L.C. 
 Two N. Riverside Plaza, Suite 600 
 Chicago, IL 60606 
 Attention: Jason Selch 
 April 7, 2006 
  


	RE:	Consent to transfer of 15,000 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Preferred Shares”) of NATCO Group Inc. (“NATCO”) and 110,061 shares of NATCO
common stock (the “Common Shares”) pursuant to that certain Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of April 7, 2006 (the “Purchase Agreement”), by and among Lime Rock Partners II, L.P. (“Transferor”) and the
entities to whom this letter is addressed (the “Purchasers”). 

 To the Parties Addressed Above: 
 NATCO has received a copy of the aforementioned Purchase Agreement. Capitalized terms not otherwise described in this letter shall have the meaning given in the Purchase
Agreement. 
 In connection with the transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement, NATCO hereby: 
  

	 	A.	consents to the sale and transfer of the Preferred Shares and Common Shares to the Purchasers pursuant to the transactions described in the Purchase Agreement (the
“Transfer”), as required pursuant to Section 4.1(b) of the Securities Purchase Agreement between Transferor and NATCO dated as of March 13, 2003, but does not consent to the transfer of the right to appoint a director pursuant to
Section 4.1(c) of that agreement or Section 4(c) of the Certificate of Designations (as defined in that agreement); 

  

	 	B.	consents to the assignment to the Purchasers of Transferor’s rights and benefits under the Registration Rights Agreement by and between Transferor and NATCO, dated
March 23, 2003 as provided in Section 1.2 of the Purchase Agreement; and 

  

	 	C.	 agrees, upon receiving a fully-executed copy of the Purchase Agreement and the certificate for the preferred shares, duly endorsed for transfer, to take all actions
on the part of NATCO reasonably 












	 	 
requested by the Transferor or any Purchaser to make effective the foregoing, including, without limitation, the registration of the Transfer on the books
and records of NATCO. 


 Sincerely, 
  

			
	NATCO Group Inc.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Richard W. FitzGerald

		 	Richard W. FitzGerald
		 	Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
		 	NATCO Group Inc.
§ 73.33 Antenna systems; showing required. ( a ) An application for authority to install a broadcast antenna shall specify a definite site and include full details of the antenna design and expected performance.
( b ) All data necessary to show compliance with the terms and conditions of the construction permit must be filed with the license application. If the station is using a directional antenna, a proof of performance must also be filed.
[28 FR 13574, Dec. 14, 1963, as amended at 37 FR 25840, Dec. 5, 1972]
§ 51.309 Use of unbundled network elements. ( a ) Except as provided in § 51.318, an incumbent LEC shall not impose limitations, restrictions, or requirements on requests for, or the use of, unbundled network elements for the service a requesting telecommunications carrier seeks to offer.
( b ) A requesting telecommunications carrier may not access an unbundled network element for the exclusive provision of mobile wireless services or interexchange services.
( c ) A telecommunications carrier purchasing access to an unbundled network facility is entitled to exclusive use of that facility for a period of time, or when purchasing access to a feature, function, or capability of a facility, a telecommunications carrier is entitled to use of that feature, function, or capability for a period of time. A telecommunications carrier's purchase of access to an unbundled network element does not relieve the incumbent LEC of the duty to maintain, repair, or replace the unbundled network element.
( d ) A requesting telecommunications carrier that accesses and uses an unbundled network element consistent with paragraph (b) of this section may provide any telecommunications services over the same unbundled network element.
( e ) Except as provided in § 51.318, an incumbent LEC shall permit a requesting telecommunications carrier to commingle an unbundled network element or a combination of unbundled network elements with wholesale services obtained from an incumbent LEC.
( f ) Upon request, an incumbent LEC shall perform the functions necessary to commingle an unbundled network element or a combination of unbundled network elements with one or more facilities or services that a requesting telecommunications carrier has obtained at wholesale from an incumbent LEC.
( g ) An incumbent LEC shall not deny access to an unbundled network element or a combination of unbundled network elements on the grounds that one or more of the elements: ( 1 ) Is connected to, attached to, linked to, or combined with, a facility or service obtained from an incumbent LEC; or
( 2 ) Shares part of the incumbent LEC's network with access services or inputs for mobile wireless services and/or interexchange services.
[61 FR 45619, Aug. 29, 1996, as amended at 68 FR 52294, Sept. 2, 2003; 70 FR 8952, Feb. 24, 2005]
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 803/2005

of 26 May 2005         

fixing the export refunds on syrups and certain other sugar products exported in the natural state

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The export refunds on the products listed in Article 1(1)(d), (f), (g) and (h) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001, exported in the natural state, shall be set out in the Annex hereto to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 27 May 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 May 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 6).

(2)OJ L 214, 8.9.1995, p. 16.

(3)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 63.

----

ANNEX

EXPORT REFUNDS ON SYRUPS AND CERTAIN OTHER SUGAR PRODUCTS EXPORTED WITHOUT FURTHER PROCESSING APPLICABLE FROM 27 MAY 2005 (1)

----

(1)  The amounts set out in this Annex are not applicable with effect from 1 February 2005 pusrsuant to Council Decision 2005/45/EC of 22 December 2004 concerning the conclusion and the provisional application of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation amending the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Swiss Confederation of 22 July 1972 as regards the provisions applicable to processed agricultural products (OJ L 23, 26.1.2005, p. 17).

(2)  Applicable only to products referred to in Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 2135/95.

(3)  Applicable only to products referred to in Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 2135/95.

(4)  The basic amount is not applicable to syrups which are less than 85 % pure (Regulation (EC) No 2135/95). Sucrose content is determined in accordance with Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 2135/95.

(5)  The basic amount is not applicable to the product defined under point 2 of the Annex to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3513/92 (OJ L 355, 5.12.1992, p. 12).

----
<PAGE>
                                                                Exhibit 23.1


                     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of the Catellus
Development Corporation Amended and Restated Executive Stock Option Plan and
the Stock Option Agreement (Joseph R. Seiger), the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 of the Catellus Development Corporation Profit Sharing & Savings Plan
& Trust, the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of the Catellus Development
Corporation Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan, Stock Purchase Program,
Incentive Stock Compensation Plan and Stock Option Plan, the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 of the Catellus Development Corporation 1995 Stock
Option Plan and the Registration Statement of 58143, 33-38827, 33-42124,
333-01215 and 333-04293, respectively) of our report dated February 12, 1997,
appearing on page F-2 of this Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation
by reference of our report on the Financial Statement Schedules, which appears
on page S-1 of this Form 10-K.

/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP

Price Waterhouse LLP
San Francisco, California
March 31, 1998
§ 73.1150 Transferring a station. ( a ) In transferring a broadcast station, the licensee may retain no right of reversion of the license, no right to reassignment of the license in the future, and may not reserve the right to use the facilities of the station for any period whatsoever.
( b ) No license, renewal of license, assignment of license or transfer of control of a corporate licensee will be granted or authorized if there is a contract, arrangement or understanding, express or implied, pursuant to which, as consideration or partial consideration for the assignment or transfer, such rights, as stated in paragraph (a) of this section, are retained.
( c ) Licensees and/or permittees authorized to operate in the 535-1605 kHz and in the 1605-1705 kHz band pursuant to the Report and Order in MM Docket No. 87-267 will not be permitted to assign or transfer control of the license or permit for a single frequency during the period that joint operation is authorized.
( d ) Authorizations awarded pursuant to the noncommercial educational point system in subpart K are subject to the holding period in § 73.7005. Applications for an assignment or transfer filed prior to the end of the holding period must demonstrate the factors enumerated therein.
[44 FR 58720, Oct. 11, 1979, as amended at 56 FR 64872, Dec. 12, 1991; 65 FR 36378, June 8, 2000]
#### § 76.108 Indemnification contracts.

No licensee shall enter into any contract to indemnify a cable system for liability resulting from failure to delete programming in accordance with the provisions of this subpart unless the licensee has a reasonable basis for concluding that such program deletion is not required by this subpart.
No. 11-9208.

#### Garcia *v.*Small, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-9560.

#### Hearron *v.*Mississippi.

Ct. App. Miss. Certiorari denied.
§ 52.105 Warehousing. ( a ) As used in this section, warehousing is the practice whereby Responsible Organizations, either directly or indirectly through an affiliate, reserve toll free numbers from the Service Management System database without having an actual toll free subscriber for whom those numbers are being reserved.
( b ) Responsible Organizations shall not warehouse toll free numbers. There shall be a rebuttable presumption that a Responsible Organization is warehousing toll free numbers if: ( 1 ) The Responsible Organization does not have an identified toll free subscriber agreeing to be billed for service associated with each toll free number reserved from the Service Management System database; or
( 2 ) The Responsible Organization does not have an identified toll free subscriber agreeing to be billed for service associated with a toll free number before switching that toll free number from reserved or assigned to working status.
( c ) Responsible Organizations shall not maintain a toll free number in reserved status if there is not a prospective toll free subscriber requesting that toll free number.
( d ) A Responsible Organization's act of reserving a number from the Service Management System database shall serve as that Responsible Organization's certification that there is an identified toll free subscriber agreeing to be billed for service associated with the toll free number.
( e ) *Tariff Provision.* The following provision shall be included in the Service Management System tariff and in the local exchange carriers' toll free database access tariffs: [T]he Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) has concluded that warehousing, which the FCC defines as Responsible Organizations, either directly or indirectly through an affiliate, reserving toll free numbers from the SMS database without having an identified toll free subscriber from whom those numbers are being reserved, is an unreasonable practice under § 201(b) of the Communications Act and is inconsistent with the Commission's obligation under § 251(e) of the Communications Act to ensure that numbers are made available on an equitable basis; and if a Responsible Organization does not have an identified toll free subscriber agreeing to be billed for service associated with each toll free number reserved from the database, or if a Responsible Organization does not have an identified, billed toll free subscriber before switching a number from reserved or assigned to working status, then there is a rebuttable presumption that the Responsible Organization is warehousing numbers. Responsible Organizations that warehouse numbers will be subject to penalties.
( f ) The provisions of this section shall not apply to toll free numbers assigned via competitive bidding or to numbers transferred under this exception.
[62 FR 20127, Apr. 25, 1997, as amended at 83 FR 53396, Oct. 23, 2018]
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            College of Information and Cyberspace
                    National Defense University
                CIC
        Search
                    Search CIC:
                        Search
                Search CIC:
                    Search
    Home

    About 
        Mission & Vision

    Faculty & Staff

    Fact Sheet

    Alumni

    Internships

    FAQ

    Admissions 
        Eligibility Requirements

    Admissions Calendar

    Application Instructions

    Apply Online

    International Students

    Academics 
        Graduate Catalog

    M.S. in Strategic Information and Cyberspace Studies
        
        JPME Master's Degree

    Cyber Workforce Master's Degree (Part Time)

    Leadership Development Programs

    Graduate Certificates

    Academic Partners

    Current Students 
        JPME II  Incoming Students

    LDP Incoming Students

    Student Registration

    Bring Your Own Device

    IA Compliance

    Completion Procedures / Order Transcripts

    Student Services and Resources

    Events
    
        Cyber Beacon

    Cyber PME Colloquium

    Hopper Award

    Lecture Series

    CYBERCOM Symposium

    NEWS

    UC2
    
        About

    Events

    Work With Us

    Center for Cybersecurity
    
        About

    Cybersecurity Center POC

    Cybersecurity Supporting Faculty

    CAE-CDE CISO Certificate Program

    Cybersecurity Trending News

    Cyber Labs
        
        Ethical Hacking

    Critical Infrastructure - SCADA

    Cyber Exercises
        
        Tabletop Exercise

    Cyber Competitions

    Cyber Resources and Awareness

    Stakeholder / Industry Advisory Council

    Contact 
        Contact Us

    Directions

    Access to Ft. McNair

    Map of Ft. McNair  Home
  NEWS
  News & Announcements
 News & Announcements News
 CIC Faculty and Staff Awards
 On June 22nd the CIC held its annual offsite meeting. Connie Marshall received the Staff Recognition Award for service to the college, professional expertise, customer service and collegiality. Lt Col James Skelton received the Faculty Peer Recognition Award for excellence in teaching, contributions of research, impact of outreach, and collegiality. For more insight into who works at the college check out our YouTube Channel.
 SHARE
 PRINT
 National Defense University


College of Information and Cyberspace

300 Fifth Ave., Bldg. 62
Fort Lesley J. McNair
Washington, DC 20319-5066

202-685-6300
                    Stay Connected
                
                
                DOD Privacy & Security
 DOD Links Disclaimer
 DOD Social Media Policy
 DOD Web Policy
 FOIA
 NDU System of Records Notice
 NDU Privacy & Security Notice
 No FEAR Act
 Open GOV
 Plain Writing Act
 Section 508
 Small Business Act
 USA.gov
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Editorial Note on Part 74
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 74 appear at 64 FR 4055, Jan. 27, 1999.

§ 74.762 Frequency measurements. ( a ) The licensee of a low power TV station or a TV translator station must measure the frequency of its output channel as often as necessary to ensure operation consistent with the Advanced Television Systems Committee (ATSC) standard (see § 73.682 of this chapter; for ATSC 1.0, § 73.682(d), ATSC A/53 Part 2, and for ATSC 3.0, § 73.682(f)(2)), and at least once each calendar year at intervals not exceeding 14 months.
( b ) In the event that a low power TV or TV translator station is found to be operating inconsistent with the standard in paragraph (a) of this section, the licensee promptly shall suspend operation of the transmitter and shall not resume operation until the transmitter has been restored to its assigned frequency.
[88 FR 30669, May 12, 2023]
#### § 73.765 Determining operating power.

The operating power specified in § 73.751 shall be determined by use of a calibrated dummy load or by any other method specified by the licensee and accepted by the Commission. Such method may subsequently be used by the licensee to maintain the authorized operating power.

(Secs. 4, 5, 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1066, 1068, 1082 (47 U.S.C. 154, 155, 303))

[38 FR 18895, July 16, 1973, as amended at 44 FR 65765, Nov. 15, 1979]