### Name:

Title: Company: Sign Date: Name: Title: Company: Sign Date: Permitted Facility Representative / Date Testing Company Representative / Date Final Test Report for

/ / Based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, I certify that the statements and information in this test report are true, accurate, and complete. I have reviewed all testing details and results in this test report and hereby certify that the test report is authentic and accurate.

Tuesday, February 15, 2011 Page 1 of 7

### Facility Information:

Shawnee Fossil Plant 7900 Metropolis Lake Road

West Paducah KY42086 Contact:Steve Strunk Phone:423-751-2808 Fax: 423-751-7011 Email: scstrunk@tva.gov Testing Company: TVA Performance Engineering 1101 Market Street PSC 1B-C Chattanooga TN37402 Contact:Jim Diederich Phone:423-876-6730 Fax: 423-846-6734 Email: jadiederich@tva.gov

Air Permit Number: V-03-054 Permitted Source ID/Name: 1379 Permitted Maximum Process Rate:Max. Normal Operation Process Rate: Target Process Test Rate

Description of the source (including control equipment). Please see the attachments for source or process flow diagram:

The following describes any modifications and/or deviations to the applicable test methods. If alternative methods were requested, see the attachments for documentation of request AND approval, including dates. Industry/SCC/NAIS221112

Sampling Location Information:

Test Parameter Information: AFS #:2114500006 FRS #:110000493305

SCC / Description10100217 External Combustion Boilers - Electric Generation - Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal - Atmospheric Fluidized Bed Combustion: Bubbling Bed (Bituminous Coal)
The following state and federal regulations that apply to the proposed testing:

Location Round

Duct Diam. Distance from upstream dist. Distance from

downstream dist. Number of

Traverse Ports Equiv. Diam Min.Travers Points Rect. Duct Length /Width Duct 0 133.95 735.3 5 142.5 5 141 144

Target Parameter Test Method Number of

Test Runs Test Run

Duration Sample

Points Comments Location Carbon Monoxide Method 10 3 10 0 Duct Formaldehyde Method 0011 3 120 0 Duct Total organic compounds

(TOC) as Propane Method 25A 3 120 0 Duct
O2 Method 3A O2 3 120 0 Duct Co2 Method 3A CO2 3 120 0 Duct Sulfur Dioxide Method 6C 3 120 0 Duct



### Tuesday, February 15, 2011 Page 2 of 7

### The following describes any modifications and/or deviations to the applicable test

methods. If alternative methods were requested, see the attachments for documentation of request AND approval, including dates. Explaination of coal sampling deviation: SGS collected 4 samples in support of HAPS sampling of SHF Unit 10. The first sample collected on 7/14/10 was collected on the ninth floor of Unit 10 from the drag chain conveyor. This coal sample location was the safest and the closest location to the unit to collect coal prior to the coal entering the unit. The sample for Run #1 is of coal already prepared to feed the unit. The ambient temperature at this location was 115 degrees Fahrenheit on7/14/10. TVA safety procedure TSP 806 prevented collecting coal samples on 7/15/10 from this location during the time of sample collection from the duct. Rather than wait until the midnight shift to collect coal samples which was not guaranteed to be allowed, I directed SGS to collect manual samples from the stockpile as the coal was being reclaimed and fed to the unit. These samples were collected according to the guidelines within the ICR with five manually collected shovel samples creating a composite sample that was given to field testing group for delivery to the TVA laboratory. The samples were not collected according to ASTM standards since the time required for collection would have increased to seven hours, which was too long to be on the stockpile in the heat of the day.
Let me know if additional info is needed.
Michael W. Gronek Principal System Engineer FPG Technical Support, Fuel Delivery Support Systems LP 2R - C 423-751-2514 FAX 423-751-8079



### Tuesday, February 15, 2011 Page 3 of 7

### Sampling / Stack Data Results Summary



### Location Duct - Method 0011 Average Run Number 1 2 3 Test Date 7/15/2010 7/16/2010 7/16/2010 Run Start Time 1:57:00 PM 8:54:00 AM12:28:00 PM

Run Finish Time 4:19:00 PM 11:31:00 AM 2:44:00 PM
Net Run Time, minutes 125 125 125 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 85.256 92.298 90.854 89.469 Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 8.02 8.59 8.58 8.397 Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.000 Carbon Dioxide, % 11.2 11.29 11.29 11.260 Oxygen, % 8.46 8.4 8.4 8.420 Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 305.44 301.12 303.84 303.467 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 272,633.2 281,521.7 286,141.8 280,098.900 Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 437,297.4 450,579.6 459,716.4 449,197.800 Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 99.5 104.3 101.0 101.600 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000 Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000 Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000



### Tuesday, February 15, 2011 Page 4 of 7

### Emissions Summary

Process Run Data 

### Location: Duct - Method 0011 Compound: Formaldehyde Average RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 0.7253 0.1751 0.4359 0.445 lb/mmBtuO2 3.08E-04 6.84E-05 1.73E-04 0.000 ppm 2.41E-01 5.37E-02 1.36E-01 0.144 ppm@7%O2 2.69E-01 5.97E-02 1.51E-01 0.160



### Tuesday, February 15, 2011 Page 5 of 7

### Process Run Data

APCD Run Data

Process Lab Run Data 

### Run Name Value UOM Comments Target Value 1 Bituminous Coal Burned 0 Tons/hr 0 

### 1 Heat Input 0 MMBtu/hr 0 1 Steam Output 0 1000 lbs/hr 0 1 Gross Generation 0 MW 0

Run Name Value UOM Comments Target Value 

### 1 BAGHOUSE 0 0

Tuesday, February 15, 2011 Page 6 of 7

### Sampling / Stack Data Results Detail



### Location Duct - Method 0011 Average Run Number 1 2 3 Test Date 7/15/2010 7/16/2010 7/16/2010 Run Start Time 1:57:00 PM8:54:00 AM12:28:00 PM Run Finish Time 4:19:00 PM11:31:00 AM 2:44:00 PM Net Traversing Points 26 26 26 Net Run Time, minutes 125 125 125 Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.255 0.255 0.255 0.255 Pitot Tube Coefficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.840 Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.012 1.012 1.012 1.012 Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.579 29.613 29.599 29.597 Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O 1.76 1.87 1.95 1.860 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 92.623 96.865 96.518 95.335 Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 116.40 97.60 104.28 106.093 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 85.256 92.298 90.854 89.469 Total Moisture Liquid collected, g 157.8 184.2 181.3 174.433 Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 7.43 8.67 8.53 8.210 Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 8.02 8.59 8.58 8.397 Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.000 Dry Mole Fraction 0.9198 0.9141 0.9142 0.916 Carbon Dioxide, % 11.2 11.29 11.29 11.260 Oxygen, % 8.46 8.4 8.4 8.420 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 80.34 80.31 80.31 80.320 Fuel Factor 1.11 1.11 1.11 Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 30.13 30.14 30.14 30.137 Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.16 29.10 29.10 29.120 Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -2.4 -1.8 -1.8 -2.000 Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.40 29.48 29.47 29.450 Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 305.44 301.12 303.84 303.467 Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.5803223253 438550.619932881

4683830.642765312

615136 0.614 Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 51.69 53.26 54.34 53.097 Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet 141.000 141.000 141.000 141.000 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 272,633.2 281,521.7 286,141.8280,098.900 Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 437,297.4 450,579.6 459,716.4449,197.800 Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 99.5 104.3 101.0 101.600 Percent Excess Air, % 66.4 65.6 65.6 65.867 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000 Round Duct Diameter, inches 0 0 0 Rectangular Duct Width, inches 141 141 141 Rectangular Duct Length, inches 144 144 144 Fw 10640 10640 1064010,640.000 Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000



### Tuesday, February 15, 2011 Page 7 of 7