alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Application for Graduate Program Completion

CICOSS@ndu.edu 

Fax: 202‐685‐4058 

Grad Form v 6/21/2021

INSTRUCTIONS 

NDU CIC students who have met the requirements for a certificate program and/or the Government 

Information Leadership (GIL) Master of Science Program must complete and return this “Application for 

Graduate Program Completion” by email directly to the NDU CIC (as an attachment) to CICOSS@ndu.edu 

or by fax to 202-685-4058. 

TRANSCRIPTS 

The NDU Registrar's Office prepares and mails all transcripts for the university. The request form is available at 

http://www.ndu.edu/academics/registrar. 

COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: 

Name (Last, First, MI): 

Email: 

Mailing Address: 

Completed Graduate Programs (mark all that apply): 

Place 

X Certificate Programs Place X GIL Master of Science Concentrations

Chief Financial Officer (CFO) Leadership Certificate Chief Financial Officer (CFO)

Chief Information Officer Certificate (CIO) Chief Information Officer (CIO)

Cyber‐ Leadership Certificate (Cyber‐L) Cyber‐Leadership (Cyber‐L)

Chief Information Security Officer Certificate (CISO) Cyber‐ Security (Cyber‐S)

Information Technology Program Management Certificate (ITPM) Information Technology Program Management (ITPM)

Chief Data Officer (CDO) National Security and Cyberspace Studies 

Student Signature: Date: 

Please include prefix and suffix, if applicable. Use full legal name.
# 2016-17 Master's Degree and Certificate Applications Now Accepted

/ Published Aug. 3, 2016
After a summer pause, the iCollege has now opened its acceptance process for Master's and Certificate students.  Please refer to the Students tab of our website for admissions and application instructions.  Refer to the Academics tab for specific information on programs and courses.
A new catalog will be available soon, and the Fall 2016 ("Academic Year 16/17") Course Schedule can be found under Quick Links on the website home page.  

Please contact the iCollege Office of Student Services at iCollegeOSS@ndu.edu or at 202-685-6300 for more information.
§ 64.5101 Basis and purpose. ( a ) *Basis.* The rules in this subpart are issued pursuant to the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.
( b ) *Purpose.* The purpose of the rules in this subpart is to implement customer proprietary network information protections for users of telecommunications relay services and point-to-point video service pursuant to sections 4, 222, and 225 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154, 222, 225.
[78 FR 40613, July 5, 2013, as amended at 82 FR 17764, Apr. 13, 2017]
No. 10-10847.

#### Gray *v.*Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION

Historical Hurricane Tracks

United States Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | National Ocean Service

Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Link Disclaimer | USA.gov

#app=1834&3e3d-selectedIndex=2 Page 1 of 1

http://csc.noaa.gov/hurricanes/ 12/9/2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          47,516
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,061
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,143)
<INVENTORY>                                      3,952
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                68,062
<PP&E>                                           7,677
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,826)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  74,422
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,160
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        63,755
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,493)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    74,422
<SALES>                                         15,589
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,034
<CGS>                                            8,916
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,916
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,987
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,751
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,067
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,684
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,684
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA-23-0012

ALMA EDWARDS,

Plaintiff/Appellant,

-vsTURLEY DENTAL CARE, PC,

Defendant/Appellee.

GRANT OF EXTENSION OF 

TIME TO FILE APPELLEE’S

ANSWER BRIEF

Appellee has filed an Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time up to and 

including May 8, 2023, within which to file Appellee’s Answer Brief. Appellee’s

counsel has represented to the Court that Appellant’s counsel has been contacted and 

does not object to this Motion.

The motion for extension of time through and including May 8, 2023, within 

which to file the Appellee’s Answer Brief, is hereby GRANTED.

DATED this ____ day of March, 2023.

_____________________________

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

March 21 2023

03/21/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0012
No. 11-5583.

#### Smith *v.*Virginia.

Sup. Ct. Va. Certiorari denied.
§ 68.108 Incidence of harm. Should terminal equipment, inside wiring, plugs and jacks, or protective circuitry cause harm to the public switched telephone network, or should the provider of wireline telecommunications reasonably determine that such harm is imminent, the provider of wireline telecommunications shall, where practicable, notify the customer that temporary discontinuance of service may be required; however, wherever prior notice is not practicable, the provider of wireline telecommunications may temporarily discontinue service forthwith, if such action is reasonable under the circumstances. In case of such temporary discontinuance, the provider of wireline telecommunications shall: ( a ) Promptly notify the customer of such temporary discontinuance;
( b ) Afford the customer the opportunity to correct the situation which gave rise to the temporary discontinuance; and
( c ) Inform the customer of his right to bring a complaint to the Commission pursuant to the procedures set forth in subpart E of this part.
[55 FR 28630, July 12, 1990, as amended at 66 FR 7583, Jan. 24, 2001]
792 A.2d 407

#### IN THE MATTER OF JEAN D. LAROSILIERE, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

March 20, 2002.

ORDER

The Office of Attorney Ethics having filed a petition with the Court pursuant to Rule 1:20-11(a) seeking the immediate temporary suspension of JEAN D. LAROSILIERE of NEWARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1990, and to gain immediate access to the law office premises at 60 Park Place, Suite 1104, Newark, New Jersey, and seize possession, custody and control of any and all attorney books and records maintained by respondent, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that pursuant to *Rule*1:20-11(a), JEAN D. LAROSILIERE is temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately and until the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the Office of Attorney Ethics shall be given access to respondent’s law office at 60 Park Place, Suite 1104, Newark, New Jersey and shall take such protective action as may be appropriate in respect of the files, financial records, practice and trust assets of JEAN D. LAROSILIERE, and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by respondent pursuant to Rule 1:21-6, shall be restrained from disbursement except on application to this Court, for good cause, shown, and shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court, who is directed to deposit the funds in the Superior Court Trust Fund pending further Order of this Court,and it is further

ORDERED that JEAN D. LAROSILIERE be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further

*77ORDERED that JEAN D. LAROSILIERE comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys.
#### § 32.4 Communications Act.

Attention is directed to the following extract from section 220 of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. 220 (1984):

(e) Any person who shall willfully make any false entry in the accounts of any book of accounts or in any record or memoranda kept by any such carrier, or who shall willfully destroy, mutilate, alter, or by any other means or device falsify any such account, record, or memoranda, or who shall willfully neglect or fail to make full, true, and correct entries in such accounts, records, or memoranda of all facts and transactions appertaining to the business of the carrier, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and shall be subject, upon conviction, to a fine of not less than $1,000 nor more than $5,000 or imprisonment for a term of not less than one year nor more than three years, or both such fine and imprisonment: Provided, that the Commission may in its discretion issue orders specifying such operating, accounting or financial papers, records, books, blanks, or documents which may, after a reasonable time, be destroyed, and prescribing the length of time such books, papers, or documents shall be preserved.

For regulations governing the periods for which records are to be retained, see part 42, Preservation of Records of Communications Common Carriers, of this chapter which relates to preservation of records.
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

The Galman Group :

:

v. :

:

Kathryn Swift, :

Appellant : No. 804 C.D. 2022

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW, May 6 , 2024

, having considered A ppell ant ’s application for

re consideration

, the application is DENIED

.
# RECENT RESEARCH ACTIVITY FROM THE CIC 

/ Published Feb. 15, 2018

COL. Nancy Blacker, CIC Professor, published an article entitled “Winning the cyberspace long game - Applying collaboration and education to deepen the U.S. bench” in the Cyber Defense Review, Volume 2, No. 2, pp. 21-30.

Dr. Julie J.C.H. Ryan, CIC Professor, and Philip William Sisson of George Washington University published an article entitled “New rationale for the need for CKOs long-term: a systems perspective on observations” in VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, Volume 47, Issue 3, pp.337-352, found athttps://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-08-2016-0044.
#### Northwood Investment Company, Grant Park Company, and Walter B. Strahan, *Appellants*vs. Thomas Murdock McIntosh, *Appellee.*

142 So. 649.

Division B.

Decision filed June 20, 1932.

*A. 8. Bussey, B. J. Bacon,*and *Joe Hatfield,*for Appellants ;

*Boozer & Boozer,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been sub*32mitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decrees herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decrees; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decrees of the Circuit Court be and the same are hereby affirmed. See Trumball vs. McIntosh, 138 So. 34.

Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.
§ 64.2107 Reduced recording and retention requirements for qualifying providers under the Safe Harbor. ( a ) ( 1 ) A covered provider may reduce its recording and retention requirements under § 64.2103 if it files one of the following certifications, signed by an officer or director of the covered provider regarding the accuracy and completeness of the information provided, in WC Docket No. 13-39. I ___ (name), ___ (title), an officer of ___ (entity), certify that___ (entity) uses no intermediate providers; or I ___ (name), ___ (title), an officer of ___ (entity), certify that___ (entity) restricts by contract any intermediate provider to which a call is directed by ___ (entity) from permitting more than one additional intermediate provider in the call path before the call reaches the terminating provider or terminating tandem. I certify that any nondisclosure agreement with an intermediate provider permits ___ (entity) to reveal the identity of the intermediate provider and any additional intermediate provider to the Commission and to the rural incumbent local exchange carrier(s) whose incoming long-distance calls are affected by the intermediate provider's performance. I certify that ___ (entity) has a process in place to monitor the performance of its intermediate providers.
( 2 ) Covered providers that file the second certification must describe the process they have in place to monitor the performance of their intermediate providers.
( b ) A covered provider that meets the requirements described in paragraph (a) of this section must comply with the data retention requirements in § 64.2103 for a period that includes only the three most recent complete calendar months, so long as it continues to meet the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section. A covered provider that ceases to meet the requirements described in paragraph (a) of this must immediately begin retaining data for six months, as required by § 64.2103.
( c ) Affiliated covered providers may meet the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section individually or in the aggregate.
( d ) The provisions of this section shall expire on September 15, 2020.
[78 FR 76239, Dec. 17, 2013, as amended at 80 FR 11594, Mar. 4, 2015; 82 FR 19615, Apr. 28, 2017; 83 FR 21737, May 10, 2018; 84 FR 25706, June, 4, 2019]
Order filed May 22, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00952-CR

____________

WILLIAM RAY PARKER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 10th District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 12CR2532

ORDER

Appellant is represented by appointed counsel, Tad Nelson. Appellant=s brief 

was originally due February 20, 2014. We granted a total extension of time of 90 

days to file appellant=s brief until May 21, 2014. When we granted the last 

extension, we noted that no further extensions would be granted absent exceptional 

circumstances. No brief was filed. On May 16, 2014, counsel filed a further request 
for extension of time to file appellant’s brief. Counsel did not allege any 

exceptional circumstances in the request. 

We deny the request for extension and issue the following order:

Tad Nelson is ORDERED to file a brief with the clerk of this court on or 

before June 23, 2014. If counsel does not timely file appellant’s brief as ordered, 

the court will issue an order abating the appeal and directing the trial court to 

conduct a hearing to determine the reason for the failure to file the brief and the 

consideration of sanctions, appointment of new counsel, or other appropriate relief.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Donovan and Brown.
No. 10-10826.

#### Gutierrez *v.*California.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
297P15

#### State v. Terrance Javarr Ross

1. State’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA15-87)

1. Allowed 08/21/2015

2. State’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

*2.*

3. State’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

3.
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Derek Nguyen, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Datalogic
International Inc;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuers's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

                                 /s/ Derek Nguyen
Date: November 13, 2003          __________________________________________
                                 Chief Executive Officer
#### § 64.6201 Purpose.

The National Deaf-Blind Equipment Distribution Program (NDBEDP) is established to support programs that distribute Equipment to low-income individuals who are deaf-blind.
Consumer Product Safety Alert

FROM THE U.S. CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, D.C. 20207

CPSC To In-Line Skaters :

Skate But Skate Safe ly -

A lw ays Wear Safety Gear

009611

• Wear a helmet, elbow

pads, knee pads,

wrist guards and

gloves.

• Learn to stop safely.

• Skate on smooth,

paved surfaces

without any traffic.

• Avoid skating at

night.

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission

(CPSC) warns that in-line skating - a popular new

sport - can be hazardous if skaters do not wear

helmets and other safety gear or do not learn to

skate and stop safely. CPSC estimates that

approximately 100,000 consumers annually

receive hospital emergency room treatment for

injuries associated with in-line skates.

Most injuries were to wrists, arms, and legs. CPSC

recommends the use of safety gear to help prevent

injuries with in-line skates. A helmet, elbow pads,

knee pads, wrist guards and gloves should always

be worn.

In addition, skaters should observe the following

safety tips:

• Get instruction. Learn to stop safely by using

the brake pads at the heel of most in-line

skates. With one foot somewhat in front of the

other, raise the toes of the front foot and push

down on the heel brake.

• Skate on smooth, paved surfaces without any

traffic. Avoid skating on streets, driveways, or

surfaces with water, sand, gravel, or dirt.

• Do not skate at night -- others can’t see you

and you can’t see obstacles or other skaters.
#### Scotty Norman BALTHAZR, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Ronald J. ANGELONE, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 03-7083.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 25, 2004.

Decided March 19, 2004.

Scotty Norman Balthazr, Appellant pro se. Robert H. Anderson, III, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, TRAXLER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

*53Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Scotty Norman Balthazr seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is appealable only if a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bal-thazr has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-pealability, deny Balthazr’s motion to vacate judgment, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
No. 11-5827.

#### Stittiams *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
1 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-50280

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

KEITH RUSSELL JUDD,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. MO-98-CR-93-1

- - - - - - - - - -

May 12, 1999

Before DAVIS, DUHÉ and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

Keith Russell Judd appeals from the district court’s order

denying release pending his trial on a two-count indictment

charging him with mailing threatening communications in an attempt

to extort money, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 876.

The district court’s decision, which effectively adopted the

reasoning of the magistrate judge who conducted the detention

hearing, is supported by evidence that indicates that no condition

or combination of conditions could be fashioned to safeguard the
community and prevent the obstruction of justice. See 18 U.S.C.

§ 3142; United States v. Rueben, 974 F.2d 580, 586 (5th Cir. 1992).

Accordingly, the district court’s detention order is AFFIRMED. All

outstanding motions filed by Judd are DENIED.

AFFIRMED; MOTIONS DENIED.
No. 11-9176.

#### Garrett *v.*Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.