alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 130 (Thursday, July 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 41647]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-17054]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER00-2885-001]


Cedar Breaks I, L.L.C.; Notice of Filing

June 29, 2000.
    Take notice that on June 29, 2000, Cedar Breaks I, L.L.C. (Cedar 
Breaks), tendered for filing an amendment to its proposed FERC Electric 
Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, filed with the Commission on June 19, 
2000 in the above-referenced docket. The amendment clarifies language 
concerning the prohibition on sales to affiliates with franchised 
service territories.
    Cedar Breaks intends to engage in wholesale electric power and 
energy purchases and sales.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before July 10, 2000. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-17054 Filed 7-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Community Bank Corporation of America (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Kenneth P. Cherven, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the Report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |     |  |                                  
|----------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------
|Date: May 4, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Kenneth P. Cherven           
|                  |  |     |  | Kenneth P. Cherven, President and
|                  |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4446 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4446

To amend section 1332 of title 28, United States Code, to require that 
  the plaintiff in a diversity case not be a resident of the State in 
                       which the case is brought.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 18, 1994

  Mr. Hughes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend section 1332 of title 28, United States Code, to require that 
  the plaintiff in a diversity case not be a resident of the State in 
                       which the case is brought.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 1332 of 
title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(e) The original jurisdiction of the district courts otherwise 
conferred by this section may not be invoked if all plaintiffs joined 
in the complaint are citizens of the State in which is located the 
district court in which the suit is filed. For purposes of this 
subsection only--
            ``(1) the District of Wyoming shall be deemed to be located 
        solely within the State of Wyoming; and
            ``(2) those portions of Yellowstone National Park situated 
        in Montana shall be deemed to be located in the District of 
        Montana; and
            ``(3) those portions of Yellowstone National Park situated 
        in Idaho shall be deemed to be located in the District of 
        Idaho.
This subsection does not apply to or limit the applicability of the 
right of removal under section 1441(a) of an action that would 
otherwise be within the original jurisdiction of the district 
courts.''.

                                 <all>
```
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            College of Information and Cyberspace
                    National Defense University
                CIC
        Search
                    Search CIC:
                        Search
                Search CIC:
                    Search
    Home

    About 
        Mission & Vision

    Faculty & Staff

    Fact Sheet

    Alumni

    Internships

    FAQ

    Admissions 
        Eligibility Requirements

    Admissions Calendar

    Application Instructions

    Apply Online

    International Students

    Academics 
        Graduate Catalog

    M.S. in Strategic Information and Cyberspace Studies
        
        JPME Master's Degree

    Cyber Workforce Master's Degree (Part Time)

    Leadership Development Programs

    Graduate Certificates

    Academic Partners

    Current Students 
        JPME II  Incoming Students

    LDP Incoming Students

    Student Registration

    Bring Your Own Device

    IA Compliance

    Completion Procedures / Order Transcripts

    Student Services and Resources

    Events
    
        Cyber Beacon

    Cyber PME Colloquium

    Hopper Award

    Lecture Series

    CYBERCOM Symposium

    NEWS

    UC2
    
        About

    Events

    Work With Us

    Center for Cybersecurity
    
        About

    Cybersecurity Center POC

    Cybersecurity Supporting Faculty

    CAE-CDE CISO Certificate Program

    Cybersecurity Trending News

    Cyber Labs
        
        Ethical Hacking

    Critical Infrastructure - SCADA

    Cyber Exercises
        
        Tabletop Exercise

    Cyber Competitions

    Cyber Resources and Awareness

    Stakeholder / Industry Advisory Council

    Contact 
        Contact Us

    Directions

    Access to Ft. McNair

    Map of Ft. McNair  Home
  NEWS
  News & Announcements
 News & Announcements News
 Nova Southeastern University Becomes Latest Academic Partner
 
 SHARE
 PRINT
 National Defense University


College of Information and Cyberspace

300 Fifth Ave., Bldg. 62
Fort Lesley J. McNair
Washington, DC 20319-5066

202-685-6300
                    Stay Connected
                
                
                DOD Privacy & Security
 DOD Links Disclaimer
 DOD Social Media Policy
 DOD Web Policy
 FOIA
 NDU System of Records Notice
 NDU Privacy & Security Notice
 No FEAR Act
 Open GOV
 Plain Writing Act
 Section 508
 Small Business Act
 USA.gov
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
§ 5.406 Responsible party, “stop-buzzer,” and notification requirements, and additional requirements related to safety of the public. ( a ) Medical testing licensees must identify a single point of contact responsible for all experiments conducted under the license and must also identify a “stop buzzer” point of contact for all experiments, consistent with subpart E, §§ 5.307 and 5.308.
( b ) Medical testing licensees must meet the notification and safety of the public requirements of subpart E, §§ 5.309 and 5.311.
[78 FR 25162, Apr. 29, 2013]
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7808** 

CALVIN GOODMAN , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. WAYNE MCCABE, Warden , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Aiken
. Richard Mark Gergel , District Judge. ( 1:13

- cv - 00594

- RMG )

Submitted : February 27 , 2014 Decided: March 5 , 2014

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Calvin Goodman, Appellant Pro Se. Alphonso Simon, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Donald John Zelenka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Cal vin Goodman seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merit s, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Goodman has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument becaus e the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
RELEASE_NOTES for CMAQv4.7.1 - 13 January 2010

from Shawn Roselle Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division, ORD

The changes and new features of this release are:

1) Aqueous chemistry

 - Mass conservation improvements

 + Imposed 1 second minimum timestep for remainder of the cloud lifetime

 after 100 "iterations" in the solver

 + Force mass balance for the last timestep in the cloud by limiting

 oxidized amount to mass available

 - Implemented steady state assumption for OH

 - Only allow sulfur oxidation to control the aqueous chemistry solver

 timestep (previously, reactions of OH, GLY, MGLY, and Hg for

 multipollutant model also controlled the timestep)

2) Vertical Advection

 - Added additional divergence-based constraint on advection timestep

 - Vertical advection now represented with PPM to limit numerical diffusion

3) Multipollutant model updates

 - Bug fix to facilitate in-line emissions option

 - Mercury

 + Dicarboxylic acid reduction mechanism applied to aqueous phase

 oxidized mercury species

 + Cl oxidation pathway based on Donohoue et al 2005 J. Phys. Chem. A 109(34)

 - Lowered CB05 mechanism unit yields for acrolein from 1,3-Butadiene

 tracer reactions to be consistent with laboratory measurements

4) Photolysis

 - JPROC/phot_table and phot_sat options

 + Expanded lookup tables to facilitate applications across the globe and

 extended vertical extent to 20km

 + Updated temperature adjustments for absorption cross sections and

 quantum yields

 + Revised algorithm that processes TOMS datasets for OMI data format

 - In-line option

 + Asymmetry factor calculation updated using values from Mie theory

 integrated over log normal particle distribution; added special

 treatment for large particles in asymmetry factor algorithm to avoid

 numerical instabilities

5) Instrumented Models

 - DDM-3D

 - Sulfur Tracking

 - Primary Carbon Apportionment

------------
Known Issues:

1) When using the inline option for biogenic emissions, only one hour output

 timesteps are supported

2) DDM-3D is currently only operational with the "eddy" vertical diffusion module

 (DDM for the acm2 or acm2_inline modules will be available in the next release)
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 154 (Thursday, August 10, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 45850]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6805]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent Decree

    In accordance with Departmental Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. 
Currahee Club, LLC, et al.. No. 06-CV-00113, was lodged with the United 
States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia on July 31, 
2006.
    This proposed Consent Decree concerns a complaint filed by the 
United States against Currahee Club, LLC, Currahee Partners, LLC, and 
Currahee Partners, II, LLC, pursuant to Sections 301 and 404 of the 
Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1311 and 1344, with respect to Defendants' 
alleged violations of the Clean Water Act by discharging pollutants 
into waters of the United States without a permit. The proposed Consent 
Decree resolves these allegations by requiring the restoration of off-
site stream and wetlands properties in the upper Savannah River 
watershed and the payment of a civil penalty. The Department of Justice 
will accept written comments relating to this proposed Consent Decree 
for thirty (30) days from the date of publication of this Notice. 
Please address comments to Martin F. McDermott, United States 
Department of Justice, Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Environmental Defense Section, P.O. Box 23986, Washington, DC 20006-
3986 and refer to United States v. Currahee Club, LLC, et al., DJ 
<greek-i>90-5-1-1-17458.
    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Clerk's Office, 
United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, 
United States Courthouse, 75 Spring Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia. In 
addition, the proposed Consent Decree may be viewed at http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/open.html.

Stephen Samuels,
Assistant Chief, Environmental Defense Section, Environment & Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 06-6805 Filed 8-9-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
No. 11-814.

#### Fiorillo et al. *v.*Incorporated Village of Ocean Beach, New York, et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-5513.

#### Rameses *v.*Kernan, Warden, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 73.1941 Equal opportunities. ( a ) *General requirements.* Except as otherwise indicated in § 73.1944, no station licensee is required to permit the use of its facilities by any legally qualified candidate for public office, but if any licensee shall permit any such candidate to use its facilities, it shall afford equal opportunities to all other candidates for that office to use such facilities. Such licensee shall have no power of censorship over the material broadcast by any such candidate. Appearance by a legally qualified candidate on any: ( 1 ) Bona fide newscast;
( 2 ) Bona fide news interview;
( 3 ) Bona fide news documentary (if the appearance of the candidate is incidental to the presentation of the subject or subjects covered by the news documentary); or
( 4 ) On-the-spot coverage of bona fide news events (including, but not limited to political conventions and activities incidental thereto) shall not be deemed to be use of broadcasting station. (section 315(a) of the Communications Act.)
( b ) *Uses.* As used in this section and § 73.1942, the term “use” means a candidate appearance (including by voice or picture) that is not exempt under paragraphs 73.1941 (a)(1) through (a)(4) of this section.
( c ) *Timing of request.* A request for equal opportunities must be submitted to the licensee within 1 week of the day on which the first prior use giving rise to the right of equal opportunities occurred: Provided, however, That where the person was not a candidate at the time of such first prior use, he or she shall submit his or her request within 1 week of the first subsequent use after he or she has become a legally qualified candidate for the office in question.
( d ) *Burden of proof.* A candidate requesting equal opportunities of the licensee or complaining of noncompliance to the Commission shall have the burden of proving that he or she and his or her opponent are legally qualified candidates for the same public office.
( e ) *Discrimination between candidates.* In making time available to candidates for public office, no licensee shall make any discrimination between candidates in practices, regulations, facilities, or services for or in connection with the service rendered pursuant to this part, or make or give any preference to any candidate for public office or subject any such candidate to any prejudice or disadvantage; nor shall any licensee make any contract or other agreement which shall have the effect of permitting any legally qualified candidate for any public office to broadcast to the exclusion of other legally qualified candidates for the same public office.
[57 FR 208, Jan. 3, 1992, as amended at 59 FR 14568, Mar. 29, 1994]
Editorial Note on Part 74
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 74 appear at 64 FR 4055, Jan. 27, 1999.

§ 74.532 Licensing requirements. ( a ) An aural broadcast STL or an aural broadcast intercity relay station will be licensed only to the licensee or licensees of broadcast stations, including low power FM stations, other than international broadcast stations, and for use with broadcast stations owned entirely by or under common control of the licensee or licensees. An aural broadcast intercity relay station also will be licensed for use by low power FM stations, noncommercial educational FM translator stations assigned to reserved channels (Channels 201-220) and owned and operated by their primary station, by FM translator stations operating within the coverage contour of their primary stations, and by FM booster stations. Aural auxiliary stations licensed to low power FM stations will be assigned on a secondary basis; *i.e.,* subject to the condition that no harmful interference is caused to other aural auxiliary stations assigned to radio broadcast stations. Auxiliary stations licensed to low power FM stations must accept any interference caused by stations having primary use of aural auxiliary frequencies.
( b ) More than one aural broadcast STL or intercity relay station may be licensed to a single licensee upon a satisfactory showing that the additional stations are needed to provide different program circuits to more than one broadcast station, to provide program circuits from other studios, or to provide one or more intermediate relay stations over a path which cannot be covered with a single station due to terrain or distance.
( c ) If more than one broadcast station or class of broadcast station is to be served by a single aural broadcast auxiliary station, this information must be stated in the application for construction permit or license.
( d ) Licensees of aural broadcast STL and intercity relay stations may be authorized to operate one or more aural broadcast microwave booster stations for the purpose of relaying signals over a path that cannot be covered with a single station.
( e ) Each aural broadcast auxiliary station will be licensed at a specified transmitter location to communicate with a specified receiving location, and the direction of the main radiation lobe of the transmitting antenna will be a term of the station authorization.
( f ) In case of permanent discontinuance of operations of a station licensed under this subpart, the licensee shall cancel the station license using FCC Form 601. For purposes of this section, a station which is not operated for a period of one year is considered to have been permanently discontinued.
[28 FR 13716, Dec. 14, 1963, as amended at 49 FR 7129, Feb. 27, 1984; 49 FR 10930, Mar. 23, 1984; 52 FR 31403, Aug. 20, 1987; 55 FR 50693, Dec. 10, 1990; 57 FR 41111, Sept. 9, 1992; 58 FR 19775, Apr. 16, 1993; 65 FR 7649, Feb. 15, 2000; 68 FR 12766, Mar. 17, 2003]
Exhibit 23





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





The Board of Directors


Celadon Group, Inc.:





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Celadon Group, Inc. Registration Statement 333-14641 on Form S-8 pertaining to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan dated October 23, 1996, Registration Statement 333-42209 on Form S-8 pertaining to the Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan dated December 12, 1997, Registration Statements
333-42207 and 333-31164 on Form S-8 pertaining to the 1994 Stock Option plan dated December 12, 1997 and February 25, 2000, respectively, and Registration Statement 333-131227 on Form S-8 pertaining to the 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan dated January 23, 2006, of our report dated September 4, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Celadon Group, Inc. as of June 30, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in
the three-year period ended June 30, 2009, and related financial statement Schedule II, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2009, which report appears in the June 30, 2009, annual report on Form 10-K of Celadon Group, Inc.








/s/ KPMG, LLP





Indianapolis, Indiana


September 4, 2009




Back to Form 10-K
No. D-2677.

#### In re Discipline of Schoenecker.

James Michael Schoenecker, of Milwaukee, Wis., is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
#### § 54.522 [Reserved]
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   I, Jeffrey Eng, Chief Executive Officer of Veridigm, Inc.(the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  1.  This Quarterly Report on 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2007, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date:  May 20, 2007  By:/s/ Jeffrey Eng ------------------------------- Jeffrey Eng President, Chief Executive Officer, and acting Chief Financial Officer
#### § 73.4075 Commercials, loud.

See Memorandum Opinion and Order, BC Docket 79-168, FCC 84-300, adopted June 27, 1984. 49 FR 28077, July 10, 1984.

[49 FR 38132, Sept. 27, 1984]