alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GOENAWAN BOEDIJONO; MEYKE

MARGARETHA,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 13-70805

Agency Nos. A096-362-468

A099-887-499

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 14, 2014** 

Before: LEAVY, GOULD, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

Goenawan Boedijono and Meyke Margaretha, natives and citizens of

Indonesia, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”)

denial of their motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under

FILED

OCT 20 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Thus, we deny Ren’s request

for oral argument. 
8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion

to reopen, Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010), and we deny

the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to

reopen as untimely because the motion was filed over three years after the BIA’s

final decision, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and they failed to establish materially

changed circumstances in Indonesia to qualify for the regulatory exception to the

time limitation for motions to reopen, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); Najmabadi,

597 F.3d at 987 (new evidence “must be ‘qualitatively different’ from the evidence

presented at the previous hearing”).

We reject petitioners’ contention that the BIA’s analysis was inadequate or

incomplete. See Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 990 (the BIA “does not have to write an

exegesis on every contention”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

2 13-70805
ex10-1.htm


Ex. 10.1

BioLargo, Inc.

Engagement Extension Agreement

 

February 10, 2017

 

This Engagement Extension Agreement (the “Extension”) references the Engagement Agreement and Scope Letter dated February 1, 2008 (“2008 Agreement”) by and between CFO 911 (the “Advisor)” and BioLargo, Inc. (the “Company”), and written extensions to the Agreement (the “Prior Extensions”), pursuant to which Charles K. Dargan II has been serving as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer. The parties desire to extend the terms of the prior agreements for a period of one year, pursuant to the terms of this Extension. The 2008 Agreement, the Prior Extensions and this Extension are collectively referred to herein as the “Agreement”.

 

Except as expressly amended or modified herein, all terms and conditions set forth in the 2008 Agreement and Prior Extensions are incorporated herein by this reference, and continue to be in full force and effect. The parties acknowledge and confirm that Mr. Dargan has been serving as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, and continues to do so through today’s date. Retroactively effective as of October 1, 2016, the Advisor and the Company hereby agree to extend the Term of the engagement as set forth in the 2008 Agreement to expire September 30, 2017 (the “Extended Term”). Notwithstanding the foregoing, either party may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days’ written notice. Upon the expiration of this Agreement on September 30, 2017, unless this agreement has been terminated, Advisor shall continue to serve as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer until new terms are agreed upon. 

 

All terms regarding compensation to the Advisor are amended and replaced by the following. During the Extended Term, the Advisor shall receive the compensation as set forth in this Extension. The Company shall issue to Charles K. Dargan II an option (the “Option”) to purchase 300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, pursuant to the Company’s 2007 Equity Incentive Plan. The Option shall vest over a period of 12 months, with 125,000 shares having vested as of February 10, 2017, and the remaining shares to vest 25,000 shares monthly beginning March 1, 2017, and each month thereafter, so long as this Agreement is in full force and effect. The Option shall be exercisable at $0.69 per share, and shall expire February 10, 2027.

 

AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED THIS 10th DAY OF February, 2017 

 

	
CFO 911
	
BioLargo, Inc.

	222 N. Sepulveda Blvd., Suite 2000	14921 Chestnut Street
	El Segundo, CA 90245, CA	Westminster, CA 92683


 

	
By:
	
/S/CHARLES K. DARGAN II
	
 
	
By:
	
/S/DENNIS P. CALVERT
	
 

	
Name:
	
Mr. Charles K. Dargan II
	
 
	
Name:
	
Mr. Dennis P. Calvert
	
 

	
Title:
	
Chief Executive Officer
	
 
	
Title:
	
President
	
 

	Date Signed:	February 10, 2017	 	Date Signed:	February 10, 2017
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned officer of ArthroCare Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

1. The accompanying annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                         |  |                                                    
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 27, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    MICHAEL A. BAKER
|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                         |  | Michael A. Baker President, Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before of after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Exhibit 23.1

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Form S-8 (No. 333-07377) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plans, in the Registration Statement Form S-8 (No. 333-53400) pertaining to the Special Purpose Stock Option Plan, in Registration Statement Form S-8 (No. 333-73000) pertaining to the 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, in Registration Statement Form S-8 (No. 333-73002)        pertaining to the 2000 Stock Option Plan, in the Registration Statement Form S-8 (No. 333-152706) pertaining to the SPAR Group, Inc. 2008 Stock Compensation Plan and in Registration Statement Form S-8 (No. 333-72998) pertaining to the 2001 Consultant Stock Purchase Plan of SPAR Group, Inc. of our report dated April 13, 2009, with respect to the December 31, 2008 and 2007 consolidated financial statements and schedule of SPAR Group, Inc. and subsidiaries included in the Annual Report on        Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2008.

|   | /s/ Rehmann Robson |
|--------|--------------------|

 

Troy, Michigan

April 14, 2009

 

Ex-1
§ 64.6408 Protection of the privacy of calls and text messages to covered hotlines. ( a ) All covered providers, wireline providers of voice service, fixed wireless providers of voice service, and fixed satellite providers of voice service shall: ( 1 ) Omit from consumer-facing logs of calls and text messages any records of calls or text messages to covered hotlines in the central database established by the Commission.
( 2 ) Maintain internal records of calls and text messages omitted from consumer-facing logs of calls and text messages pursuant to paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( 3 ) Be responsible for downloading the initial database file and subsequent updates to the database file from the central database established by the Commission. Updates must be downloaded and implemented by covered providers, wireline providers of voice service, fixed wireless providers of voice service, and fixed satellite providers of voice service no later than 15 days after such updates are made available for download.
( b ) With respect to covered providers, wireline providers of voice service, fixed wireless providers of voice service, and fixed satellite providers of voice service that are not small service providers, compliance with paragraph (a) of this section shall be required December 5, 2024. In the event the Wireline Competition Bureau has not released the database download file specification by April 5, 2024, or in the event the Wireline Competition Bureau has not announced that the database administrator has made the initial database download file available for testing by October 7, 2024, the compliance deadline set forth in this paragraph (b) shall be extended consistent with the delay, and the Wireline Competition Bureau is delegated authority to revise this section accordingly.
( c ) With respect to small service providers that are covered providers or wireline providers of voice service, compliance with paragraph (a) of this section shall be required June 5, 2025. In the event the Wireline Competition Bureau has not released the database download file specification by October 7, 2024, or in the event the Wireline Competition Bureau has not announced that the database administrator has made the initial database download file available for testing by April 7, 2025, the compliance deadline set forth in this paragraph (c) shall be extended consistent with the delay, and the Wireline Competition Bureau is delegated authority to revise this section accordingly.
#### § 76.1708 [Reserved]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Customs Service

          - [T.D. 00-43]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Customs Service, Department of the Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Announcement of the quota quantity for tuna fish for calendar year 2000.

# SUMMARY:

Each year, the tariff-rate quota for tuna fish described in subheading 1604.14.20, HTSUS, is based on canned tuna production by the United States for the preceding calendar year. This document sets forth the quota for calendar year 2000. 

# EFFECTIVE DATES:

The calendar year 2000 tariff-rate quota is applicable to tuna fish entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the period January 1, through December 31, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Cynthia Porter, Chief, Quota/Visa Branch, Trade Programs, Office of Field Operations, U.S. Customs Service, Washington, D.C. 20229, (202) 927-5399. 

## Background

It has been determined that 28,305,623 kilograms of tuna may be entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption during the calendar year 2000, at the rate of 6 percent ad valorem under subheading 1604.14.20, HTSUS. Any such tuna which is entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the current calendar year in excess of this quota will be dutiable at the rate of 12.5 percent ad valorem under subheading 1604.14.30 HTSUS. 

Dated: June 30, 2000. 

Raymond W. Kelly, 

Commissioner. 

[FR Doc. 00-17137 Filed 7-6-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4820-02-P
3011831

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 20-0056

DAGMARA MACH, on behalf of 

herself and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff/Appellee,

v.

MONTANA HEALTH 

COOPERATIVE d/b/a MONTANA 

HEALTH CO-OP, and JOHN DOES 1-

5,

Defendant/Appellant.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Appellant, Defendant, Montana Health Cooperative has requested an 

extension of time to file its Opening Brief in this matter. There being no objection 

from Appellee, and for good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted a 30-day extension of 

time up to and including September 2, 2020, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve its Opening Brief in this matter.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 18 2020

07/20/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0056
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"19-2454: MCINTOSH v. DEFENSE [OPINION], Precedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"tLUtZ3b8u0\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/11-09-2022-19-2454-mcintosh-v-defense-opinion-19-2454-opinion-11-9-2022_2030956\/\">19-2454: MCINTOSH v. DEFENSE [OPINION], Precedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/11-09-2022-19-2454-mcintosh-v-defense-opinion-19-2454-opinion-11-9-2022_2030956\/embed\/#?secret=tLUtZ3b8u0\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“19-2454: MCINTOSH v. DEFENSE [OPINION], Precedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"tLUtZ3b8u0\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"OPINION Posted: MCINTOSH v. DEFENSE [OPINION](pdf) Appeal Number: 19-2454 Origin: MSPB Precedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LEODEGARI CONTRERAS-REYES,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-70088

Agency No. A099-475-210

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 19, 2013** 

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Leodegari Contreras-Reyes, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s denial of his application for cancellation of removal. Our

jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence

FILED

DEC 11 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
the agency’s continuous physical presence determination. Ibarra-Flores v.

Gonzales, 439 F.3d 614, 618 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny in part and dismiss in part

the petition for review. 

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that ContrerasReyes did not demonstrate ten years of continuous physical presence in the United

States. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(d)(2) (departure for any periods exceeding 180 days

in the aggregate breaks continuous physical presence).

We lack jurisdiction to consider Contreras-Reyes’ due process claim

regarding the lack of an interpreter at his removal hearing because he did not raise

it before the agency and therefore failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. 

See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004) (this court lacks

jurisdiction to review contentions not raised before the agency).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part. 

2 12-70088
#### § 32.5040 Private line revenue.

This account shall include revenue derived from local services that involve dedicated circuits, private switching arrangements, and/or predefined transmission paths, whether virtual or physical, which provide communications between specific locations (e.g., point-to-point communications. It includes revenue from subvoice grade, voice grade, audio and video program grade, digital transmission and local private network switching as well as the revenue from administrative and operational support services associated with private network services and facilities, e.g., charges for company-directed testing, expedited installation, and service restoration priority.
###### Editorial Note on Part 74

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 74 appear at 64 FR 4055, Jan. 27, 1999.

#### § 74.798 [Reserved]
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                        CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of MIV Therapeutics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months ending February 28, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Alan P. Lindsay, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.




/S/ Alan P. Lindsay
-------------------
Alan P. Lindsay
President and CEO
April 14, 2003
No. 10-10776.

#### Downing *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
144P15

#### State v. Calvin Lewis Moore, Jr.

1. State's Motion for Temporary Stay (COA14-1033)

1. Allowed 04/27/2015

Dissolved 09/24/2015

2. State’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

2. Denied

3. State’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

3. Denied
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       8,564,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         548,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 14,553,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      42,893,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    156,780,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,580,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             228,226,000
<DEPOSITS>                                 207,226,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                 3,200,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,426,000
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,335,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,079,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             228,226,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              3,472,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              928,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                16,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             4,416,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,635,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,710,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,706,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  150,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (1,000)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,429,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,126,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,126,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   721,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.38
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.10
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,311,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   665,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                             1,626,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              1,361,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,390,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    6,000
<RECOVERIES>                                    26,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,560,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         2,560,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        154,000


</TABLE>
No. 11-6049.

#### Rush *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
Z St

£¤24

S Toledo St

El

m

St

CR-6

X St

Pine St

W

2

nd

St W

3

rd

St

Mo

n

roe

St

W

Chestn

ut

St

Harrison Ave

Oregon

Gulch

Rd

E

3

rd

St

B

ro

o

k

ly

n

C

i

r

E

2

nd

St

S Pine St

Oro Trl

Oak S

P

t

lum St

S Spruce St

Spruce St W 4th

St

Oregon Trl

E

2

nd

St

!(

CaliforniaGulch

Colorado

Map Date: February13,2013

MapProjection:UTM,Meters,13North,NAD83

DataSources:

OperableUnitBoundary-U.S.EPARegion8(2013)

WasteRockPile-MFG,Inc.(2009)

Streets-Navteq(2011)

Imagery-Bing(2013)

*Boundariesarebasedonthenatureandextentofcontamination

andaresubjecttochange.

CaliforniaGulchSuperfundSite

OperableUnit7

ApacheTailings

£

0200400Feet

050100Meters

OU7

WasteRockPile

Highways