alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

Rule 13a-14(a)

CERTIFICATION

I, John C. Fanning, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of COMFORCE Corporation, hereby certify that:

1. I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of COMFORCE Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 7, 2007



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ John C. Fanning                 
|John C. Fanning,                    
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



22
Exhibit 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Toys "R" Us, Inc.
(the "Company") for the fiscal year ended February 1, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Louis
Lipschitz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

            1.    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

            2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



                                        /s/ Louis Lipschitz
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name:  Louis Lipschitz.
                                        Title: Executive Vice President - Chief
                                               Financial Officer
                                        Date:  April 30, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Toys "R" Us, Inc. and will be retained by Toys "R" Us, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-51150

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

BENITO MARTINEZ, also known as Benny,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:12-CR-2108-2

Before SMITH, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Benito Martinez appeals from his conviction of one count of conspiracy 

to possess with intent to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine and two 

counts of possession with intent to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine 

and aiding and abetting. He argues that the district court admitted into 

evidence recorded conversations between him and a confidential informant in 

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2511 and 18 U.S.C. § 2515 because the Government 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 21, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-51150 Document: 00512845169 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/21/2014
No. 13-51150

failed to establish that the confidential informant voluntarily consented to the 

recordings.

Because Martinez objected to the admission of the recordings below, we 

review the district court’s decision to admit the evidence under a heightened 

abuse of discretion standard. See United States v. Garcia, 530 F.3d 348, 351 

(5th Cir. 2002). An abuse of discretion occurs when the disputed ruling is 

grounded in a clearly erroneous factual finding or a legal error. Id. If a factual 

finding is plausible in light of the record as a whole, it is not clearly erroneous 

and should be upheld. United States v. Alaniz, 726 F.3d 586, 618 (5th Cir. 

2013).

For consent to intercept an electronic communication to be valid, the 

consent must be voluntary and free from coercion. United States v. Juarez, 573 

F.2d 267, 278 (5th Cir. 1978). “Voluntariness is a question to be determined 

from the totality of the circumstances.” United States v. Tomblin, 46 F.3d 

1369, 1377 (5th Cir. 1995).

The totality of the circumstances indicates that the confidential 

informant voluntarily consented to the recordings. See id. Because the district 

court’s finding that the confidential informant consented to the recordings is 

plausible in light of the record as a whole, the district court did not abuse its 

discretion by admitting the recordings into evidence. See Alaniz, 726 F.3d at 

618; Garcia, 530 F.3d at 351. Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 13-51150 Document: 00512845169 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/21/2014
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 27, 2021

s0419

Order 

Clerk

April 27, 2021

161751

VENESSA DAVIS, JOHN DAVIS, RONALD

W. RADATZ, NEIL J. HAMANN, JACQUELINE

A. HAMANN, DENNIS J. HAMANN, JOSEPH

SHARPE, JR., MICHELLE SHARPE, JOHN A.

ESCHENBERG, II, LEAH ESCHENBERG,

TERRY MERCHANT, TERESA MERCHANT,

CHARLES COGGINS, II, KIMBERLY

COGGINS, and CHARLES COGGINS, III,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 161751

COA: 346729

St. Clair CC: 16-001197-CE

SUNOCO PIPELINE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

and SUNOCO LOGISTICS PARTNERS

OPERATIONS GP, LLC,

Defendants-Appellants,

and

ENBRIDGE ENERGY LIMITED

PARTNERSHIP, ENBRIDGE PIPELINES

LAKEHEAD, LLC, ENBRIDGE PIPELINES

TOLEDO, INC., GREAT LAKES PETROLEUM

CORPORATION, GREAT LAKE PETROLEUM

COMPANY, and GREAT LAKES PETROLEUM

TRANSPORTATION, LLC,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 18, 2020 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Case Records - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"aEYkZpnBhb\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/case-information\/case-records\/\">Case Records<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/case-information\/case-records\/embed\/#?secret=aEYkZpnBhb\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Case Records” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"aEYkZpnBhb\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Case Records Since March 1, 2012 For cases filed on or after March 1, 2012, all case information and documents are available through\u00a0PACER (external)\u00a0or at public terminals located in the Clerk’s Office. Case Records Before March 1, 2012 For cases filed before March 1, 2012, all case records are stored with the National Archives and […]"}
#### § 3.44 Time to achieve settlements.

All maritime telecommunications accounts should be timely paid in accordance with applicable ITU Regulations, Article 66 and International Telecommunication Regulations (Melbourne, 1988). Accounting authorities are deemed to be responsible for remitting, in a timely manner, all valid amounts due to foreign administrations or their agents.
§ 64.2007 Approval required for use of customer proprietary network information. ( a ) A telecommunications carrier may obtain approval through written, oral or electronic methods. ( 1 ) A telecommunications carrier relying on oral approval shall bear the burden of demonstrating that such approval has been given in compliance with the Commission's rules in this part.
( 2 ) Approval or disapproval to use, disclose, or permit access to a customer's CPNI obtained by a telecommunications carrier must remain in effect until the customer revokes or limits such approval or disapproval.
( 3 ) A telecommunications carrier must maintain records of approval, whether oral, written or electronic, for at least one year.
( b ) *Use of opt-out and opt-in approval processes.* A telecommunications carrier may, subject to opt-out approval or opt-in approval, use its customer's individually identifiable CPNI for the purpose of marketing communications-related services to that customer. A telecommunications carrier may, subject to opt-out approval or opt-in approval, disclose its customer's individually identifiable CPNI, for the purpose of marketing communications-related services to that customer, to its agents and its affiliates that provide communications-related services. A telecommunications carrier may also permit such persons or entities to obtain access to such CPNI for such purposes. Except for use and disclosure of CPNI that is permitted without customer approval under § 64.2005, or that is described in this paragraph, or as otherwise provided in section 222 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, a telecommunications carrier may only use, disclose, or permit access to its customer's individually identifiable CPNI subject to opt-in approval.
#### Larry Dynell JUSTICE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer Mike DOBROWSKI, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 04-6060.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 11, 2004.

Decided March 19, 2004.

Larry Dynell Justice, Appellant pro se.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Larry Dynell Justice appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Justice v. Dobrowski,*No. CA-03-866-2 (E.D.Va. filed Dec. 11, 2003 & entered Dec. 12, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
Exhibit
10.2.3


 





February 19, 2007


Geoffrey Boyd

Chief Financial Officer

Eschelon Telecom, Inc.

730 Second Avenue South

Suite 900

Minneapolis, MN 55402-2456


Dear Mr. Boyd:


Your existing service
agreement will expire on April 30, 2007 and we are extending the termination
language in that agreement for another two (2) years or through April 30, 2009.


In the event that your
employment with Eschelon Telecom, Inc. is terminated without cause anytime
before April 30, 2009, the Company will continue your salary and medical
payments for a period of one (1) year beyond termination. Additionally,
Eschelon will accelerate the vesting of options by more than one (1) year if
the Board of Eschelon approves any modifications to option/restricted stock
agreements that are more favorable than those in this agreement. The
obligations imposed on you as an Officer of Eschelon Telecom, Inc. with respect
to confidentiality, non-disclosure, and non-solicitation shall continue
notwithstanding the termination of the employment relationship between the
parties.


	
  Accepted and Agreed:

  



 


 


	
  

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Richard A.
  Smith      2/21/07

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Cliff D.
  Williams      2/21/07

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Richard A. Smith

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Cliff D.
  Williams

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  President &
  Chief Executive Officer

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Chairman &
  Founder

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Accepted and Agreed:

  
	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Geoffrey M.
  Boyd      2/21/07

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Geoffrey M. Boyd

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Chief Financial
  Officer

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
								



 


· 730 Second Avenue South ·
Suite 900 · Minneapolis, MN 55402 ·
Phone (612) 376-4400 · Fax (612) 376-4411
Important Facts:

• Tuition-Free for DoD Personnel 

(Military and Civilian)

• Fully Remote and Part-Time

• Self-Nominated 

Minimum Admissions Eligibility Criteria:

• Bachelor’s Degree (3.0 GPA minimum)

• O4, GS13, or Equivalent and Above

The CISO program prepares 

graduates to:

• Exercise strategic leadership and critical 

thinking in the development and use of 

cyber security strategies, plans, policies, 

enabling technologies, and procedures in 

cyberspace;

• Develop and lead programs to provide 

cyber security, security awareness training, 

risk analysis, certification and accreditation, 

security incident management, continuity of 

operations, and disaster recovery.

• Link people, processes, information, and 

technology to critical cyber mission 

decisions to share information in a secure 

environment.

• Develop and lead, in accordance with laws 

and regulations, an enterprise IA program 

that promotes and attains national security, 

agency, and inter-agency goals.

• Communicate at the strategic level 

demonstrating command of the topic, 

logical organization, compelling argument, 

and excellence in English grammar and 

syntax.

Courses Required (3 credit hours each)

CIC6211 Cybersecurity Fundamentals 

CIC6217 Illicit Use of Cyber

CIC6218Risk Management Framework for 

Strategic Leaders

CIC6201Cyber Security for Information 

Leaders

CIC6230Critical Information Infrastructure 

Protection

CIC6504 Continuity of Operations

Chief Information Security Officer

Graduate Certificate

The Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) graduate certificate program (also known as the 

Cyber-S (Security) certificate) is a source of accredited graduate-level information security 

education for those currently serving or intending to serve as CISO, Senior Agency Information 

Security Officers (SAISO), or cyber security managers. This program provides advanced 

education to respond to the requirements set forth in the Federal Information Security 

Management Act (FISMA).

For more information refer to:

Website: cic.ndu.edu

Phone number: 202-685-6300

Email: cicoss@ndu.edu

Attend our Monthly Virtual Open House for prospective students on the 4th Thursday of every month @ 1pm – 2pm EST

https://us.bbcollab.com/guest/886062331bd3403f8bd9a2ac591ddc3a or +1-571-392-7650 PIN: 125 656 9347
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 148 (Wednesday, August 2, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 43652-43653]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6637]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

32 CFR Part 362

[DoD Directive 5105.19]


Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA)

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document removes part 362, ``Defense Information Systems 
Agency (DISA)'' presently in Title 32 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations. This part has served the purpose for which it was intended 
in the CFR and is no longer necessary.

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 2, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: L.M. Bynum (703) 696-4970.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This part 362 is removed to as a part of a 
DoD exercise to remove organizational charters from the CFR because 
they have

[[Page 43653]]

no impact on the public. The revised DoD Directive 5105.19 is available 
at http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/html/510519.htm.

List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 362

    Organizations.

PART 362--[REMOVED]

0
Accordingly, by the authority of 10 U.S.C. 301, 32 CFR part 362 is 
removed.

    Dated: July 27, 2006.
L.M. Bynum,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 06-6637 Filed 8-1-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
#### § 5.101 Frequency stability.

Experimental Radio Service licensees shall ensure that transmitted emissions remain within the authorized frequency band under normal operating conditions: Equipment is presumed to operate over the temperature range −20 to + 50 degrees Celsius with an input voltage variation of 85% to 115% of rated input voltage, unless justification is presented to demonstrate otherwise.
§ 32.23 Nonregulated activities. ( a ) This section describes the accounting treatment of activities classified for accounting purposes as “nonregulated.” Preemptively deregulated activities and activities (other than incidental activities) never subject to regulation will be classified for accounting purposes as “nonregulated.” Activities that qualify for incidental treatment under the policies of this Commission will be classified for accounting purposes as regulated activities. Activities that have been deregulated by a state will be classified for accounting purposes as regulated activities. Activities that have been deregulated at the interstate level, but not preemptively deregulated, will be classified for accounting purposes as regulated activities until such time as this Commission decides otherwise. The treatment of nonregulated activities shall differ depending on the extent of the common or joint use of assets and resources in the provision of both regulated and nonregulated products and services.
( b ) When a nonregulated activity does not involve the joint or common use of assets and resources in the provision of both regulated and nonregulated products and services, carriers shall account for these activities on a separate set of books consistent with instructions set forth in §§ 32.1406 and 32.7990. Transfers of assets, and sales of products and services between the regulated activity and a nonregulated activity for which a separate set of books is maintained, shall be accounted for in accordance with the rules presented in § 32.27, Transactions with Affiliates. In the separate set of books, carriers may establish whatever detail they deem appropriate beyond what is necessary to provide this Commission with the information required in §§ 32.1406 and 32.7990.
( c ) When a nonregulated activity does involve the joint or common use of assets and resources in the provision of regulated and nonregulated products and services, carriers shall account for these activities within accounts prescribed in this system for telephone company operations. Assets and expenses shall be subdivided in subsidiary records among amounts solely assignable to nonregulated activities, amounts solely assignable to regulated activities, and amounts related to assets and expenses incurred jointly or in common, which will be allocated between regulated and nonregulated activities. Carriers shall submit reports identifying regulated and nonregulated amounts in the manner and at the times prescribed by this Commission. Nonregulated revenue items not qualifying for incidental treatment as provided in § 32.4999(l) of this part, shall be recorded in separate subsidiary record categories of Account 5280, Nonregulated operating revenue. Amounts assigned or allocated to regulated products or services shall be subject to part 36 of this chapter.
[52 FR 6560, Mar. 4, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 49322, Dec. 7, 1988; 59 FR 46930, Sept. 13, 1994; 64 FR 50007, Sept. 15, 1999]
No. 11-9177.

#### German *v.*Broward County Sheriff’s Office et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-1232.

#### Collins *v.*Virginia.

Sup. Ct. Va. Certiorari denied.