41728 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 130 / Thursday, July 6, 2000 / Notices

1The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19

CFR 207.2(f)).

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that

the U.S. International Trade

Commission has determined: (1) To

extend the deadline for determining

whether to review the final initial

determination (ID) on violation by three

weeks, or until August 28, 2000, and (2)

to extend the target date for completing

the investigation by three weeks, or

until October 16, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Shara L. Aranoff, Esq., Office of the

General Counsel, U.S. International

Trade Commission, telephone 202–205–

3090, e-mail saranoff@usitc.gov.

Hearing-impaired persons are advised

that information can be obtained by

contacting the Commission’s TDD

terminal on 202–205–1810. General

information concerning the Commission

may also be obtained by accessing its

Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

Commission instituted this trademarkbased investigation on September 16,

1999, based on a complaint filed by

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

alleging violations of section 337 by

reason of (a) infringement of 11

federally registered U.S. trademarks; (b)

unfair competition under the Lanham

Act; (c) improper importation of

products under the Lanham Act; and (d)

dilution of the registered trademarks.

On June 22, 2000, the presiding

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) issued

her final ID on the merits in this

investigation, finding a violation of

section 337. The ALJ also issued her

recommended determination on remedy

and bonding. The Commission has

determined to extend its deadline for

determining whether to review the final

ID from August 7, 2000, to August 28,

2000, and to extend the target date for

completion of the investigation from

September 25, 2000, to October 16,

2000.

This action is taken under the

authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act

of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) and rules

210.42(h)(2) and 210.51(a) of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (19 CFR 210.42(h)(2) and

210.51(a)).

Copies of the nonconfidential version

of the ID and all other nonconfidential

documents filed in connection with this

investigation are or will be available for

inspection during official business

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the

Office of the Secretary, U.S.

International Trade Commission, 500 E

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,

telephone 202–205–2000.

By order of the Commission.

Issued: June 29, 2000.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–17079 Filed 7–5–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731–TA–464 (Review)]

Sparklers From China

Determination

On the basis of the record 1 developed

in the subject five-year review, the

United States International Trade

Commission determines, pursuant to

section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930

(19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act), that

revocation of the antidumping duty

order on sparklers from China would be

likely to lead to continuation or

recurrence of material injury to an

industry in the United States within a

reasonably foreseeable time.

Background

The Commission instituted this

review on July 1, 1999 (64 FR 35689)

and determined on October 1, 1999 that

it would conduct a full review (64 FR

55960, October 15, 1999). Notice of the

scheduling of the Commission’s review

and of a public hearing to be held in

connection therewith was given by

posting copies of the notice in the Office

of the Secretary, U.S. International

Trade Commission, Washington, DC,

and by publishing the notice in the

Federal Register on February 16, 2000

(65 FR 7892). The hearing was held in

Washington, DC, on May 11, 2000, and

all persons who requested the

opportunity were permitted to appear in

person or by counsel.

The Commission transmitted its

determination in this review to the

Secretary of Commerce on July 10, 2000.

The views of the Commission are

contained in USITC Publication 3317

(July 2000), entitled Sparklers from

China: Investigation No. 731–TA–464

(Review).

By order of the Commission.

Issued: June 28, 2000.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–17077 Filed 7–5–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

COMMISSION

[Investigations Nos. 731–TA–678–679 and

681–682 (Review)]

Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil, India,

Japan, and Spain

AGENCY: United States International

Trade Commission.

ACTION: Scheduling of full five-year

reviews concerning the antidumping

duty orders on stainless steel bar from

Brazil, India, Japan, and Spain.

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives

notice of the scheduling of full reviews

pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the

Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5))

(the Act) to determine whether

revocation of the antidumping duty

orders on stainless steel bar from Brazil,

India, Japan, and Spain would be likely

to lead to continuation or recurrence of

material injury within a reasonably

foreseeable time. The Commission has

determined that these grouped reviews

are extraordinarily complicated and has

decided to exercise its authority to

extend the review period by up to 90

days pursuant to 19 U.S.C.

1675(c)(5)(B), (C)(iv). For further

information concerning the conduct of

these reviews and rules of general

application, consult the Commission’s

Rules of Practice and Procedure, part

201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part

201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and

F (19 CFR part 207).

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 28, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred

Ruggles (202–205–3187), Office of

Investigations, U.S. International Trade

Commission, 500 E Street SW,

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain

information on this matter by contacting

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–

205–1810. Persons with mobility

impairments who will need special

assistance in gaining access to the

Commission should contact the Office

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.

General information concerning the

Commission may also be obtained by

accessing its internet server (http://

www.usitc.gov).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background.—On April 6, 2000, the

Commission determined that responses

to its notice of institution of the subject

five-year reviews were such that full

reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of

the Act should proceed (65 FR 20834,

April 18, 2000). A record of the

Commissioners’ votes, the

Commission’s statement on adequacy,

and any individual Commissioner’s