alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"Patrick Chesnut","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/chesnutp\/","title":"New Oral Argument Scheduling Conflicts Guidance - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Lni6k46i9l\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/new-oral-argument-scheduling-conflicts-guidance\/\">New Oral Argument Scheduling Conflicts Guidance<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/new-oral-argument-scheduling-conflicts-guidance\/embed\/#?secret=Lni6k46i9l\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“New Oral Argument Scheduling Conflicts Guidance” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"Lni6k46i9l\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"The Clerk\u2019s Office is providing guidance to clarify the criteria for allowable and unallowable counsel scheduling conflicts with upcoming oral argument sessions. \u00a0The provided list is neither dispositive nor exhaustive, and the Clerk\u2019s Office reviews each submission in its entirety. However, this guidance applies to most conflicts received, and it aims to provide helpful information […]"}
No. 10-10758.

#### Hamilton *v.*Wilkinson, Warden, et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 54.1521 Transitional mobile support additional annual reporting. ( a ) Each recipient of transitional mobile support shall report and certify, no later than thirty (30) days following the end of the calendar year in which it receives such transitional support, that it has met the requisite mobile transmissions supporting voice and data to and from the network meeting or exceeding the following: ( 1 ) For 4G LTE service, outdoor data transmission rates of at least 10 Mbps download/1 Mbps upload, at least one service plan that includes a data allowance of at least 5 GB that is offered to consumers at a rate that is reasonably comparable to similar service plans offered by mobile wireless providers in urban areas, and latency of 100 milliseconds or less round trip; and
( 2 ) For 5G-NR service, outdoor data transmission rates of at least 35 Mbps download/3 Mbps upload and a plan offered to consumers at a rate that is reasonably comparable to similar service plans offered by mobile wireless providers in urban areas.
( b ) Each recipient of transitional mobile support shall submit no later than thirty (30) days following the end of the calendar year an annual map reporting the network hardening activities undertaken during the prior calendar year. The recipient must submit, along with the map, a detailed narrative description of the network hardening activities identified and of how it made use of the support to facilitate those network hardening activities.
( c ) Each report shall be submitted to the Office of the Secretary of the Commission through the Electronic Comment Filing System clearly referencing the appropriate docket for the Uniendo a Puerto Rico Fund and the Connect USVI Fund; the Administrator; and the authority in the U.S. Territory, or Tribal governments, as appropriate. All filings and certifications shall also be submitted to the Bureau at *ConnectAmerica@fcc.gov .*
( d ) Recipients of transitional mobile support have a continuing obligation to maintain the accuracy and completeness of the information provided in their reports. All recipients of transitional mobile support shall provide information about any substantial change that may be of decisional significance regarding their eligibility for transitional support and compliance with Uniendo a Puerto Rico Fund and the Connect USVI Fund requirements as an update to their report submitted to the entities listed in paragraph (c) of this section. Such notification of a substantial change, including any reduction in the network coverage area being served or any failure to comply with any of the transitional support requirements, shall be submitted within ten (10) business days after the reportable event occurs.
( e ) In order for a recipient of transitional mobile support to continue to receive transitional mobile support for the second 12-month period, it must submit the reports and certification required by this section by the deadlines set forth above.
[88 FR 29000, May 5, 2023]
No. 11-8716.

#### Seeboth *v.*Mayberg et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-860.

#### Xianli Zhang et al. *v.*United States.

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 99.14

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Amended  Quarterly  Report of Houston  Operating  Company
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report").  I,
J.R. Nelson, President, CEO, and CFO of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sction 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ J.R. Nelson
                                         --------------------------------
                                         J.R. Nelson, President/CEO/CFO

Dated:  8/26/02
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4674

To provide for the reliquidation of certain entries of imported chemicals.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 29, 1994

Mrs. COLLINS of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To provide for the reliquidation of certain entries of imported

chemicals.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RELIQUIDATION OF CERTAIN ENTRIES.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 514 of

5 the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other pro6 vision of law, upon proper request filed with the United

7 States Customs Service within 180 days after the date of

8 the enactment of this Act, the Customs Service shall—

9 (1) reliquidate the entries described in sub10 section (b) at the rate of duty of 3.7 percent ad va11 lorem; and
2

•HR 4674 IH

1 (2) refund to the importer the appropriate

2 amount of import duty paid with respect to such en3 tries.

4 (b) AFFECTED ENTRIES.—The entries referred to in

5 subsection (a) are as follows:

Entry No. Date of entry

2403522–5 10–31–91

2403773–4 11–13–91

2483549–1 03–09–92

Æ
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT NO. 99: CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF THE "SAFE HARBOR"
PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995

Written or oral statements made by Alcan or its representatives, including
statements set forth in Alcan's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002,
which describe the Company's or management's objectives, projections, estimates,
expectations or predictions of the future may be "forward-looking statements"
within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995, which can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such
as "believes," "expects," "may," "will," "should," "estimates," "anticipates" or
the negative thereof or other variations thereon. The Company cautions that, by
their nature, forward-looking statements involve risk and uncertainty and that
the Company's actual results could differ materially from those expressed or
implied in such forward-looking statements or could affect the extent to which a
particular projection is realized.

Important factors which could cause the Company's actual performance to differ
materially from projections or expectations included in forward-looking
statements include global aluminum supply and demand conditions, aluminum ingot
prices and changes in other raw materials costs and availability, cyclical
demand and pricing within the principal markets for the Company's products,
changes in government regulations, particularly those affecting environmental,
health or safety compliance, economic developments and other factors within the
countries in which the Company operates or sells its products and other factors
relating to the Company's ongoing operations including, but not limited to,
litigation, labour negotiations and fiscal regimes.

Copies of the Company's filings may be obtained by contacting the Company or the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

                                       33
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Frank P. Reilly, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of NuState Energy Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of NuState Energy Holdings, Inc.

                                    NuSTATE ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC.

                                    /s/ Frank P. Reilly
                                    -------------------
                                    Frank P. Reilly
                                    Chief Executive Officer and
                                    Principal Financial and Accounting Officer

May 20, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Rachel Suzanne ANDERSON, Appellant.

No. 03-3122.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 6, 2004.

Decided March 16, 2004.

Kyra Jenner, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Fort Smith, AR, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Rachel Suzanne Anderson, Greenville, IL, pro se.

Robert P. Newman, Bentonville, AR, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BYE, MCMILLIAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Rachel Anderson (Anderson)1 appeals the sentence the district court2 imposed after she pleaded guilty to making, possessing, and uttering forged and counterfeit securities in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 513(a) and 2, and making false statements on a bank loan application in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1014 and 2. Anderson argues that the district court misapplied the Sentencing Guidelines in calculating her criminal history points and in denying her a reduction for her role in the offenses.

We conclude the district court did not clearly err in finding that Anderson was not eligible for a mitigating-role reduction. *See United States v. Field,*110 F.3d 587, 590 (8th Cir.1997). Nor did the court clearly err in calculating Anderson’s criminal history. *See*U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2, comment. (n.2) (criminal history points are based on sentence pronounced, not length of time actually served), comment, (n.3) (prior sentences are related if they resulted from offenses that occurred on same occasion, were part of single common scheme or plan, or were consolidated for trial or sentencing); *United States v. Levi,*229 F.3d 677, 679 (8th Cir.2000) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. Anderson’s motion to dismiss the appeal is denied as moot.

1

. Anderson is sometimes spelled Andersen.

2

. The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas.
No. 11-5415.

#### Valdovinos-Mendez *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# iCollege Publishes Chapter in Book "Charting a Course: Strategic Choices for a New Administration" 

/ Published Jan. 11, 2017
In the recently published book “Charting a Course: Strategic Choices for a New Administration” the iCollege’s faculty collaborated to publish Chapter 8 titled Cyber Policy. The aim of the chapter is to give guidance to the new administration in cyberspace arguing the next U.S. President must have a clear understanding of the relationship of technology, law, and policy in formulating options.
READ CHAPTER 8 HERE
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 47 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 47

To provide an antitrust exemption for medical self-regulatory entities 
when engaged in standard setting and enforcement activities designed to 
          promote the quality of care, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

  Mr. Archer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide an antitrust exemption for medical self-regulatory entities 
when engaged in standard setting and enforcement activities designed to 
          promote the quality of care, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ANTITRUST EXEMPTION.

    No damages, interest on damages, costs, or attorney's fees may be 
recovered under section 4, 4A, or 4C of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 15, 
15a, 15c), or under any State law similar to such section, from any 
medical self-regulatory entity (including its members, officers, 
employees, consultants, and volunteers) as a result of engaging in 
standard setting or enforcement activities designed to promote the 
quality of health care provided to patients.

SEC. 2. CONSULTATION.

    Any Federal agency engaged in the establishment of medical 
professional standards shall consult with and use appropriate medical 
self-regulatory entities, if available, in carrying out standard 
setting and related regulatory activities.

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

    For purposes of this Act--
            (1) the term ``medical self-regulatory entity'' means a 
        medical society or association, a specialty board, a recognized 
        accrediting agency, a hospital medical staff, or other entity 
        designed to ensure the provision of high quality medical care, 
        and
            (2) the term ``standard setting and enforcement activities 
        designed to promote the quality of health care provided to 
        patients'' means peer review, accreditation of medical 
        education and hospitals, technology assessment, risk 
        management, or the development and implementation of practice 
        guidelines, practice parameters, or ethical codes.

                                 <all>
```
§ 3.51 Cessation of operations. The FCC must be notified immediately should an accounting authority plan to relinquish its certification or cease to perform settlements as authorized. Additionally, the Commission must be advised in advance of any proposed transfer of control of an accounting authority's firm or organization, by any means, to another entity. ( a ) When an accounting authority is transferred, merged or sold, the new entity must apply for certification in its own right if it is interested in becoming an accounting authority. Provided the new applicant is eligible and completes the application process satisfactorily, the AAIC will be transferred to the new applicant. In the case of a merger of two accounting authorities, the merged entity must decide which AAIC to retain.
( b ) Section 3.21(a) will be waived for these applicants.
( c ) The applicant must comply with application process including public comment.
( d ) The applicant must certify acceptance of all accounts and must furnish a list of the accounts to the Commission at the time of application.
0 1/0 3 8

- 1 Regulation I PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR AGENCY

1904 3 rd Avenue, Suite 105 Seattle, Washington 98101

- 3317 (206) 343

- 8800



# REGULATION I

ARTICLE 8: OUTDOOR BURNING

SECTION 8.06 OUTDOOR BURNING OZONE CONTINGENCY MEASURE

Adopted 12/19/02 (976)

(a) Applicabili ty. This section shall apply to open burning within King, Kitsap, Pierce, and Snohomish Counties if, in consultation with the Washington State Department of Ecology and the Agency, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency makes a written finding that:

(1) A quality

- assured violation of the national ambient air quality standard for
ozone has occurred, and

(2) Prevention of future violations can be reasonably addressed through the implementation of this section.

The Agency shall provide public notice of thi s written finding no later than November 1. This section shall take effect on July 1 following the public notice of such a written finding.

(b) It shall be unlawful for any person to cause or allow outdoor burning within King, Kitsap, Pierce, or Snohomish Counties during the months of July through August.0 1/0 3 8

- 2 Regulation I PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR AGENCY

1904 3 rd Avenue, Suite 105 Seattle, Washington 98101

- 3317 (206) 343

- 8800



# REGULATION II

ARTICLE 2: GASOLINE MARKETING EMISSION

STANDARDS

SECTION 2.10 GASOL INE STATION OZONE CONTINGENCY MEASURE

Adopted 12/19/02 (976)

(a) Applicability. This section shall apply to gasoline stations that use coaxial Stage 1 vapor recovery systems and dispense 600,000 gallons or more of gasoline per year if, in consultatio n with the Washington State Department of Ecology and the Agency, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency makes a written finding that:

(1) A quality

- assured violation of the national ambient air quality standard for
ozone has occurred, and

(2) Prevention of future violations can be reasonably addressed through the implementation of this section.

The Agency shall provide public notice of this written finding no later than November 1. This section shall take effect on May 1 following the public notice

of s uch a written finding.

(b) It shall be unlawful for any person to cause or allow the transfer of gasoline from a transport tank into a stationary storage tank unless a California Air Resources Board (CARB) Stage I system, approved after July 1, 2002, is in stalled and operated in accordance with CARB system certification requirements.

(c) The systems required in Section 2.10(b) of this regulation shall be installed within 1 year of the May 1 effective date listed in Section 2.10(a) of this regulation.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         1,398,427
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  25,029
<ALLOWANCES>                                   4,815
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,850,261
<PP&E>                                         118,469
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,582
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,850,261
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          12,579
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       13,407
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,837,682
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,850,261
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  303,521
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               205,011
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.01)




</TABLE>
No. 11-9644.

#### In re Snyder.

Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.