alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 26, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00374

- CV

Adam REPOSA,

Appellant s

v.

Keith HENNEKE and David Escamilla,

Appellee s

From the 425th Judicial District Court, Williamson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18

- 1071

- C425

Honorable David Peeples, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant has filed a motion requesting additional time in which to file his brief.

Appellant’s motion is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is due on or before January 10, 2020.

Further requests for an extension of time in which to file appella nt’s brief will be

disfavored.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS W HEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 26th day of November, 2019

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

MARIO REYES-CALDERON,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 14-50559

D.C. No. 3:14-cr-02147-DMS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Dana M. Sabraw, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 14, 2016** 

Before: BEA, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Mario Reyes-Calderon appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 37-month sentence for attempted reentry

of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Reyes-Calderon’s counsel has filed a brief stating

FILED

JUN 20 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of

record. We have provided Reyes-Calderon the opportunity to file a pro se

supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been

filed. 

Reyes-Calderon waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Our

independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80

(1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United

States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss

the appeal. See id. at 988. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.

2 14-50559
§ 32.6512 Provisioning expense. ( a ) This account shall include costs incurred in provisioning material and supplies, including office supplies. This includes receiving and stocking, filling requisitions from stock, monitoring and replenishing stock levels, delivery of material, storage, loading or unloading and administering the reuse or refurbishment of material. Also included are adjustments resulting from the periodic inventory of material and supplies.
( b ) Credits shall be made to this account for amounts transferred to construction and/or to Plant Specific Operations Expense. These costs are to be cleared by adding to the cost of material and supplies a suitable loading charge.
[67 FR 5696, Feb. 6, 2002]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

CELADON GROUP, INC.

SUBSIDIARY NAME                                  INCORPORATION JURISDICTION
---------------                                  --------------------------

Celadon E-Commerce, Inc.                                     DE

Celadon Jacky Maeder Company                                 NY

Celadon Logistics, Inc.                                      DE

Celadon Mexicana, S.A. de C.V.                               MX

Celadon Transportation, LLP                                  IN

Celadon Trucking Services, Inc.                              NJ

Celadon Trucking Services of Indiana, Inc.                   IN

Cheetah Brokerage Co.                                        NV

Cheetah Transportation, Inc.                                 DE

Gerth Transport, Ltd.                                        ON

International Freight Holding Corp.                          DE

JML Freight Forwarding, Inc.                                 NY

Leasing Servisio, S.A. de C.V.                               MX

Randy Express, Ltd.                                          NY

RIL Acquisition Corp.                                        DE

RIL Group, Ltd.                                              DE

RIL, Inc.                                                    DE

Servicios de Transportacion Jaguar, S.A. de C.V.             MX

TruckersB2B, Inc.                                            DE

Wellingmuft Holding Co.                                      NY

Zipp Express, Inc.                                           IN
### 090000648112935e.xlsx

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A B C D **Name Title**  **Affiliation Phone Number**  Ballo, Timothy Associate Attorney Earthjustice (202) 667-4500 Beck, Scott Product Engineering Manager Lakeview Metals (847) 838-9800 Petersen, Eric Director of Customer Services &

Research AK Steel (513) 425-5000 Fernstrom, Gary Senior Project Manager PG&E (510) 530-1789 DeLaski, Andrew Executive Director ASAP (617) 363-9470 Roy, Robin Director NRDC (212) 727-2700 Nadel, Steve Executive Director ACEEE (202) 507-4011 Robles, Eduardo Eaton Greeson, Robert Sr. Electrical Design Engineer Federal Pacific (276) 645-8210 Tendulkar, Vijay ONYX Power Kennedy, Chad Schneider Caskey, John Assistant Vice President of Industry

Operations NEMA (703) 841-3233 Millure, David Sr. Vice President Metglas (843) 349-7380 Cymbalsky, John Supervisory Operations Research

Analyst DOE 202-287-1692 Stoering, Mark VP of Business Development Xcel Energy; ERAC (612) 215-4570



### Page 1 of 4

### 090000648112935e.xlsx

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A **Name** Ballo, Timothy Beck, Scott Petersen, Eric Fernstrom, Gary DeLaski, Andrew Roy, Robin Nadel, Steve Robles, Eduardo Greeson, Robert Tendulkar, Vijay Kennedy, Chad Caskey, John Millure, David Cymbalsky, John Stoering, Mark 

### E

**Email** tballo@earthjustice.org ScottB@LVMetals.com Eric.Petersen@aksteel.com gbf1@pge.com adelaski@standardsASAP.org rroy@nrdc.org snadel@aceee.org rgreeson@federalpacific.com

john.caskey@nema.org dave.millure@metglas.com john.cymbalsky@ee.doe.gov mark.e.stoering@xcelenergy.com



### Page 2 of 4

### 090000648112935e.xlsx

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A **Name** Ballo, Timothy Beck, Scott Petersen, Eric Fernstrom, Gary DeLaski, Andrew Roy, Robin Nadel, Steve Robles, Eduardo Greeson, Robert Tendulkar, Vijay Kennedy, Chad Caskey, John Millure, David Cymbalsky, John Stoering, Mark 

### F G H I J

**Alternates Alternates (2)**  Looby, KevinLakeview Metals

Waltner Meg NRDC

Ryan, Paul Hitachi Metals

America paul.ryan@hitmet.com Berman, RobertBerman Economics Cohen, Dan Asst Gen Counsel 

### Daniel.Cohen@hq.doe.gov

Page 3 of 4

### 090000648112935e.xlsx

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A **Name** Ballo, Timothy Beck, Scott Petersen, Eric Fernstrom, Gary DeLaski, Andrew Roy, Robin Nadel, Steve Robles, Eduardo Greeson, Robert Tendulkar, Vijay Kennedy, Chad Caskey, John Millure, David Cymbalsky, John Stoering, Mark 

### K

BermanEconomics@ gmail.com



### Page 4 of 4
#### § 64.902 Transactions with affiliates.

Except for carriers which employ average schedules in lieu of determining their costs, all carriers subject to § 64.901 are also subject to the provisions of § 32.27 of this chapter concerning transactions with affiliates.

[55 FR 30461, July 26, 1990]
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4790

To designate the United States courthouse under construction in St. Louis,

Missouri, as the ‘‘Thomas F. Eagleton United States Courthouse’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 19, 1994

Mr. GEPHARDT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Public Works and Transportation

A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse under construction in St. Louis, Missouri, as the ‘‘Thomas F. Eagleton

United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The United States courthouse under construction at

5 111 South Tenth Street in St. Louis, Missouri, shall be

6 known and designated as the ‘‘Thomas F. Eagleton

7 United States Courthouse’’.

8 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

9 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

10 paper, or other record of the United States to the United
2

•HR 4790 IH

1 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

2 to be a reference to the ‘‘Thomas F. Eagleton United

3 States Courthouse’’.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 161 (Monday, August 21, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 48577]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7057]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Notice of Opportunity for Public Comment on Surplus Property 
Release at Northeast Alabama Regional Airport, Gadsden, AL

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent to rule on land release request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of Title 49, U.S.C. 47153(c), notice is 
being given that the FAA is considering a request from the Gadsden 
Airport Authority to waive the requirement that a 26.69-acre parcel of 
surplus property, located at the Northeast Alabama Regional Airport, be 
used for aeronautical purposes.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 20, 2006.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this notice may be mailed or delivered in 
triplicate to the FAA at the following address: Jackson Airports 
District Office, 100 West Cross Street, Suite B, Jackson, MS 39208-
2307.
    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be 
mailed or delivered to the Gadsden Airport Authority, Gadsden, Alabama 
at the following address: P.O. Box 961, Gadsden, Alabama 35902-0961.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Keafur Grimes, Program Manager, 
Jackson Airports District Office, 100 West Cross Street, Suite B, 
Jackson, MS 39208-2307, (601) 664-9886. The land release request may be 
reviewed in person at this same location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA is reviewing a request by the 
Gadsden Airport Authority to release 26.69 acres of surplus property at 
the Northeast Alabama Regional Airport. The property will be purchased 
by Acemco, which is a manufacturing Company. The property consist of 
forested lands. The net proceeds from the sale of this property will be 
used for airport purposes.
    Any person may inspect the request in person at the FAA office 
listed above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    In addition, any person may, upon request, inspect the request, 
notice and other documents germane to the request in person at the 
Gadsden Airport Authority Office in Gadsden, Alabama.

Rans D. Black,
Manager, Jackson Airports District Office, Southern Region.
[FR Doc. 06-7057 Filed 8-18-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,818
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    564,006
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               668,892
<PP&E>                                          92,206
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 797,828
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          671,865
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,453,798
<OTHER-SE>                                     479,860
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   797,828
<SALES>                                      4,474,339
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                        2,655,402
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,805,560
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              70,094
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (986,623)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (988,323)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6307
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BOBBY BLAINE RASNAKE, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CR-93-22) Submitted: September 5, 1996 Decided: September 17, 1996 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bobby Blaine Rasnake, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Randall Ramseyer, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTOR NEY, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for a reduction of his sentence. We have reviewed the recordand the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Rasnake , No. CR-93-22 (W.D. Va. Jan. 11, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 22 June 2005         

recognising in principle the completeness of the dossier submitted for detailed examination in view of the possible inclusion of pinoxaden in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC

(notified under document number C(2005) 1839)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2005/459/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection on the market (1), and in particular Article 6(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Without prejudice to Article 6(4) of Directive 91/414/EEC, the dossier concerning the active substance identified in the Annex to this Decision, which was submitted to the Commission and the Member States with a view to obtaining the inclusion of this substance in Annex I to that Directive, satisfies in principle the data and information requirements set out in Annex II to that Directive.

The dossier also satisfies the data and information requirements set out in Annex III to that Directive in respect of one plant protection product containing the active substance, taking into account the uses proposed.

Article 2

The rapporteur Member State shall pursue the detailed examination for the dossier concerned and shall report the conclusions of this examination accompanied by any recommendations on the inclusion or non-inclusion of the active substance concerned in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC and any conditions related thereto to the European Commission as soon as possible and at the latest within a period of one year from the date of publication of this Decision in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 June 2005.

For the Commission

Markos KYPRIANOU            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 230, 19.8.1991, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Commission Directive 2005/34/EC (OJ L 125, 18.5.2005, p. 5).

----

ANNEX

ACTIVE SUBSTANCE CONCERNED BY THIS DECISION

----
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-335

_____________________________

DAPHEDRON LAMAR ALLEN,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel—

Original Jurisdiction.

October 23, 2019

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate 

counsel is denied on the merits.

B.L. THOMAS, OSTERHAUS, and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Rick A. Sichta and Susanne K. Sichta of The Sichta Firm, LLC, 

Jacksonville, for Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Virginia Chester Harris, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 130 (Thursday, July 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 41664]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-17071]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6730-4]


Notice of Open Meeting of the Environmental Financial Advisory 
Board on August 7-8, 2000

    The Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Environmental Financial 
Advisory Board (EFAB) will hold an open meeting of the full Board in 
San Francisco, California on August 7-8, 2000. The meeting will be held 
at the World Trade Club, Ferry Building, in the International Room. The 
Monday, August 7 session will run from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. and the 
August 8 session will begin at 8:30 a.m. and end at approximately 12 
noon.
    EFAB is chartered with providing analysis and advice to the EPA 
Administrator on environmental finance. The purpose of this meeting is 
to discuss progress with work products under EFAB's current strategic 
action agenda and to develop an action agenda to direct the Board's 
activities. Environmental financing topics expected to be discussed 
include: Financing Issues Related to the Office of Water's Gap 
Analysis, Environmental and Multi-State Revolving Funds, Cost-effective 
Environmental Management, Brownfields Redevelopment, and International 
Environmental Financing.
    The meeting is open to the public, but seating is limited. For 
further information, please contact Vanessa Bowie, EFAB Coordinator, 
U.S. EPA on (202) 564-5186.

    Dated: June 28, 2000.
Ronald Bachand,
Acting Deputy Comptroller.
[FR Doc. 00-17071 Filed 7-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
#### LOWDEN v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12658.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Feb. 20, 1951.

Leroy L. Lomax, Portland, Or., for appellant.

*485Henry L. Hess, U. S. Atty., Floyd D. Hamilton and John R. Brooke, Asst. U. S. Attys.', Portland, Or., for appellee.

Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, POPE, Circuit Judge, and GOODMAN, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment on the first count of the indictment is affirmed, the instrument proved falsely to have been made by the appellant being an order for the purpose of enabling a person to obtain from an officer of the United States the sum of $592.00 in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 495.

It is unnecessary to consider the contention of error in the judgment on the second count of the indictment, since it is for the same term of imprisonment and to run concurrently with the first count. Danziger v. United States, 9 Cir., 161 F.2d 299, 301.

Judgment affirmed.
§ 73.1010 Cross reference to rules in other parts. Certain rules applicable to broadcast services, some of which are also applicable to other services, are set forth in the following Parts of the FCC Rules and Regulations. ( a ) Part 1, “Practice and Procedure.” ( 1 ) Subpart A, “General Rules of Practice and Procedure”. (§§ 1.1 to 1.117).
( 2 ) Subpart B, “Hearing Proceedings”. (§§ 1.201 to 1.364)
( 3 ) Subpart C, “Rulemaking Proceedings”. (§§ 1.399 to 1.430).
( 4 ) Subpart G, “Schedule of Statutory Charges and Procedures for Payment”. (§§ 1.1101 to 1.1117.)
( 5 ) Subpart H, “Ex Parte Communications”. (§§ 1.1200 to 1.1216).
( 6 ) Subpart I, “Procedures Implementing the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969”. (§§ 1.1301 to 1.1319).
( 7 ) Subpart P, “Implementation of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988”. (§§ 1.2001-1.2003.)
( 8 ) Subpart Q, “Competitive Bidding Proceedings” (§§ 1.2101-1.2112).
( 9 ) Subpart T, “Foreign Ownership of Broadcast, Common Carrier, Aeronautical En Route, and Aeronautical Fixed Radio Station Licensees”. (§§ 1.5000 to 1.5004).
( 10 ) Part 1, Subpart W of this chapter, “FCC Registration Number”. (§§ 1.8001-1.8005).
( b ) Part 2, “Frequency Allocations and Radio Treaty Matters, General Rules and Regulations”, including Subparts A, “Terminology”; B, “Allocation, Assignments and Use of Radio Frequencies”; C, “Emissions”; D, “Call Signs and Other Forms of Identifying Radio Transmissions”; and J, “Equipment Authorization Procedures”.
( c ) [Reserved]
( d ) Part 17, “Construction, Marking and Lighting of Antenna Structures”.
( e ) Part 74, “Experimental, Auxiliary and Special Broadcast and Other Program Distributional Services” including: ( 1 ) Subpart A, “Experimental Broadcast Stations”;
( 2 ) Subpart D, “Remote Pickup Broadcast Stations”;
( 3 ) Subpart E, “Aural Broadcast Auxiliary Stations”;
( 4 ) Subpart F, “Television Broadcast Auxiliary Stations”;
( 5 ) Subpart G, “Low Power TV, TV Translator and TV Booster Stations”;
( 6 ) Subpart H, “Low Power Auxiliary Stations”;
( 7 ) Subpart L, “FM Broadcast Translator Stations and FM Broadcast Booster Stations”.
[53 FR 2498, Jan. 28, 1988, as amended at 57 FR 48333, Oct. 23, 1992; 60 FR 55480, Nov. 1, 1995; 63 FR 48622, Sept. 11, 1998; 66 FR 47896, Sept. 14, 2001; 69 FR 72043, Dec. 10, 2004; 76 FR 70911, Nov. 16, 2011; 81 FR 86613, Dec. 1, 2016]
## U nit edSta tes C ou rt o f App eal s For t h e Firs t C ircu it
No. 04-2051 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,
v. JAMES T. LATA, SR., Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA The opinion of this court issued on June 24, 2005, is amended as follows: On page 8, line 9, delete the quotation marks after the word "significantly."