alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   Exhibit 10.18


                                   ASSIGNMENT
                                   ----------


            WHEREAS, TELXON CORPORATION. whose full post office address is 3330
West Market Street, P.O. Box 5582, Akron, Ohio 44334-0582, U.S.A., is the owner
of the entire right, title and interest in and to the invention described and
claimed in Canadian patent application Serial No. 2,259,153, filed June 19,
1997, relating to;


                       CELLULAR SYSTEM HAND-OFF PROTOCOL


            AND WHEREAS, AIRONET WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, INC., whose full post
office address is 3875 Embassy Parkway, Akron, Ohio, 44334-0292, U.S.A., is
desirous of acquiring all right, title and interest in Canada in and to the
aforesaid invention;


            NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of
which is hereby acknowledged, the aforesaid does hereby sell and assign to the
aforesaid all its right, title and interest in and to the above-mentioned
Canadian patent application, and all its corresponding right, title and interest
in and to any patent which may issue therefor.


         DATED at Akron, Ohio, U.S.A., this 4th day of August, 1999.


                               TELXON CORPORATION


         [c.s.]
                               /s/Glenn S. Hansen
                              -----------------------------------
                              Name: Glenn S. Hansen
                              Position: Vice President, Legal Administration


                                             WITNESS:


                                             /s/Suzanne M. Testerman
                                             -----------------------------------
                                                    SUZANNE M. TESTERMAN
                                                       Notary Public
                                                       State of Ohio
                                              My Commission Expires 08-19-2001
368PA15

#### Wilkes v. City of Greenville

Def’s Motion to Amend New Brief

Allowed 05/27/2016
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                            STERLING COMMERCE, INC.
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                  (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE INFORMATION)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   YEAR ENDED
                                                                  SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                                      1996
                                                                  -------------
<S>                                                               <C>
Primary:
 Average shares outstanding......................................     74,233
 Net effect of dilutive stock options--based on the treasury
  stock method using average market price........................      1,243
  
                                                                     -------
   Total.........................................................     75,475
                                                                     =======
 Net income......................................................    $58,392
                                                                     =======
 Per share amount................................................       $.77
                                                                     =======
Fully diluted:
 Average shares outstanding......................................     74,233
 Net effect of dilutive stock options--based on the treasury
  stock method using the higher of average or year-end market          
  price..........................................................      1,243
                                                                     -------
   Total.........................................................     75,475
                                                                     =======
 Net income......................................................    $58,392
                                                                     =======
 Per share amount................................................       $.77
                                                                     =======
</TABLE>
Dean of Students: Jonathan.r.beasley.mil@ndu.edu

CIC Office of Student Services: CICOSS@ndu.edu

USA: brent.a.kauffman.mil@ndu.edu

USN andrew.m.gadbois.mil@ndu.edu

USAF perry.d.alexander.mil@ndu.edu

DHS(USCG) michael.h.brody.civ@ndu.edu

DOS jonathan.d.henick.civ@ndu.edu

DISA robert.c.richardson.civ@ndu.edu

All Others Jonathan.r.beasley.mil@ndu.edu
§ 51.805 The Commission's authority over proceedings and matters. ( a ) If the Commission assumes responsibility for a proceeding or matter pursuant to section 252(e)(5) of the Act, the Commission shall retain jurisdiction over such proceeding or matter. At a minimum, the Commission shall approve or reject any interconnection agreement adopted by negotiation, mediation or arbitration for which the Commission, pursuant to section 252(e)(5) of the Act, has assumed the state's commission's responsibilities.
( b ) Agreements reached pursuant to mediation or arbitration by the Commission pursuant to section 252(e)(5) of the Act are not required to be submitted to the state commission for approval or rejection.
792 A.2d 407

#### IN THE MATTER OF STANLEY J. GULKIN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 219521969).

March 20, 2002.

ORDER

STANLEY J. GULKIN of LIVINGSTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1969, and who thereafter was temporarily suspended from the practice of law by Order of this Court filed March 4, 2002, and who remains suspended at this time, having tendered his consent to disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that STANLEY J. GULKIN is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by STANLEY J. GULKIN pursuant to *Rule*1:21-6 shall be restrained from disbursement except on application to this Court for good cause shown and shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court, who is directed to deposit the funds in the Superior Court Trust Fund pending further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that a meeting of the Advisory Committee on the Readjustment of Veterans will be held on September 7-8, 2006, at The American Legion, Washington Office, at 1608 K Street, NW., Washington, DC from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. each day. The meeting will be open to the public.

The purpose of the Committee is to review the post-war readjustment needs of veterans and to evaluate the availability and effectiveness of VA programs to meet these needs.

The agenda for September 7 will review the coordination of services between VA and the Department of Defense as this relates to ensuring a seamless transition for returning war veterans. The topics covered will include deployment-related problems faced by service members and their families, and Battlemind Training as developed by the Walter Reed Army Institute for Research.

On September 8 the Committee will be provided with an update on the current activities of the Readjustment Counseling Service Vet Center program to serve the veterans from Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom. The agenda will also include a review of the partnership between VA and DOD in implementing the Post-Deployment Health Reassessment Program; strategic planning activities, and drafting recommendations for the Committee's next report to Congress.

                    No time will be allocated at this meeting for receiving oral presentations from the public. However, members of the public may direct written questions or submit prepared statements for review by the Committee in advance to Mr. Charles M. Flora, M.S.W., Designated Federal Officer, Readjustment Counseling Service, Department of Veterans Affairs (15), 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420. Those who plan to attend or have questions concerning the meeting may contact Mr. Flora at (202) 273-8969 or                     *charles.flora@va.gov.*

Dated: August 9, 2006.

By Direction of the Secretary.

E. Philip Riggin,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 06-6994 Filed 8-17-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Marilyn Kelly

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 1, 2006 

d1129 

Order 

 

December 1, 2006 

132537 & (13) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 132537 

 COA: 272888 

Muskegon CC: 05-051518-FH 

DETRICK ANTIONE WILLIAMS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the October 13, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented 

should now be reviewed by this Court. 

 KELLY, J., would grant interlocutory leave to appeal to consider the 

constitutionality of requiring a filing fee from indigent defendants in criminal cases.
#### New Port Richey Country Club, Inc., a corporation, *Plaintiff in Error,*vs. W. E. Ellis, *Defendant in Error.*

142 So. 655.

Division A.

Decision filed June 24, 1932.

*Chancey & Thomas,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Hampton -& Greene,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for -the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to' the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.
§ 63.504 Contents of applications to close a public toll station where no other such toll station of the applicant in the community will continue service and where telephone toll service is not otherwise available to the public through a telephone exchange connected with the toll lines of a carrier. The application shall contain: ( a ) The name and address of each applicant;
( b ) The name, title, and post office address of the officer to whom correspondence concerning the application is to be addressed;
( c ) Nature of proposed discontinuance, reduction, or impairment;
( d ) Identification of community or part of community involved and date on which applicant desires to make proposed discontinuance, reduction, or impairment effective; if for a temporary period only, indicate the approximate period for which authorization is desired;
( e ) Proposed new tariff listing, if any, and difference, if any, between present charges to the public and charges for the service to be substituted, if any;
( f ) Description of the service area affected including population and general character of business of the community;
( g ) Name of other carrier or carriers, if any, which will provide toll station service in the community;
( h ) Statement of the reasons for proposed discontinuance, reduction, or impairment;
( i ) Statement of the factors showing that neither present nor future public convenience and necessity would be adversely affected by the granting of the application;
( j ) Description of any previous discontinuance, reduction, or impairment of service to the community affected by the application, which has been made by the applicant during the 12 months preceding filing of application, and statement of any present plans for future discontinuance, reduction, or impairment of service to such community;
( k ) Description of the service involved, including a statement of the number of toll telephone messages sent-paid and received-collect, and the revenues from such traffic, in connection with the service proposed to be discontinued for each of the past 6 months; and, if the volume of such traffic handled in the area has decreased during recent years, the reasons therefor.
[28 FR 13229, Dec. 5, 1963, as amended at 82 FR 48777, Oct. 20, 2017]
No. 11-8813.

#### Wilson *v.*Hedgpeth, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 21
 Subsidiaries of the Registrant as of January 31, 2009
 Name
    
    Jurisdiction of IncorporationCE Stores, LLC
    
    DelawareEagle, LLC
    
    DelawareGeoffrey Holdings, LLC
    
    DelawareGeoffrey International, LLC
    
    DelawareGeoffrey, LLC
    
    DelawareGiraffe Holdings, LLC
    
    DelawareGiraffe Intermediate, LLC
    
    DelawareGiraffe Intermediate Holdings, LLC
    
    DelawareGiraffe Junior, LLC
    
    DelawareGiraffe Junior Holdings, LLC
    
    DelawareGiraffe Properties, LLC
    
    DelawareMAP Real Estate, LLC
    
    DelawareMAP 2005 Real Estate, LLC
    
    DelawareMPO Holdings, LLC
    
    DelawareMPO Intermediate, LLC
    
    DelawareMPO Intermediate Holdings, LLC
    
    DelawareMPO Junior, LLC
    
    DelawareMPO Junior Holdings, LLC
    
    DelawareMPO Properties, LLC
    
    DelawareToys R Us  Belgium, Inc.
    
    DelawareToys R Us  Delaware, Inc.
    
    DelawareToys R Us Europe, LLC
    
    DelawareToys R Us International, LLC
    
    DelawareToys R Us  Service, LLC
    
    DelawareToys R Us  Value, Inc.
    
    VirginiaTRU 2005 RE Holding Co. I, LLC
    
    DelawareTRU 2005 RE I, LLC
    
    DelawareTRU 2005 RE II Trust
    
    DelawareTRU Australia Holdings, LLC
    
    DelawareTRU Belgium Holdings II, Inc.
    
    DelawareTRU Hong Kong Holdings, LLC
    
    DelawareTRU Japan Holdings, Inc.
    
    DelawareTRU Japan Holdings 2, LLC
    
    DelawareTRU  SVC, LLC
    
    VirginiaTRU (Vermont), Inc.
    
    VermontWayne Real Estate Company, LLC
    
    DelawareWayne Real Estate Holding Company, LLC
    
    DelawareBabies R Us (Australia) Pty Ltd
    
    AustraliaToys R Us (Australia) Pty Ltd
    
    AustraliaToys R Us Handelsgesellschaft m.b.H.
    
    AustriaToys R Us  Belgium, SCA
    
    BelgiumToys R Us (Canada) Ltd./Toys R Us (Canada) Ltee
    
    CanadaToys R Us France Real Estate SAS
    
    FranceToys R Us SARL
    
    FranceToys R Us GmbH
    
    GermanyToys R Us Logistik GmbH
    
    GermanyToys R Us Operations GmbH
    
    GermanyR Us Sourcing (Asia) Limited
    
    Hong KongTRU (HK) Limited
    
    Hong KongY.K. Babiesrus Internet Japan
    
    JapanY.K. Toysrus Internet Japan
    
    JapanToys R Us Portugal, Limitada
    
    Portugal




---



##### 



Name
    
    Jurisdiction of IncorporationTRU of Puerto Rico, Inc.
    
    Puerto RicoToys R Us Iberia, S.A.
    
    SpainToys R Us Iberia Real Estate, S.L.
    
    SpainToys R Us Madrid, S.L.
    
    SpainToys R Us AG
    
    SwitzerlandToys R Us Financial Services Limited
    
    United KingdomToys R Us Holdings Limited
    
    United KingdomToys R Us Holdings (UK) Limited
    
    United KingdomToys R Us Limited
    
    United KingdomToys R Us (UK) Limited
    
    United KingdomToys R Us Properties Limited
    
    United KingdomToys R Us Properties (UK) Limited
    
    United KingdomTruToys (UK) Limited
    
    United Kingdom
Exhibit 31.1
                         SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

     I, Randall Peterson, certify that:

     1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Softwall
Equipment Corporation.;

     2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report.

     3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
annual report;

     4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-
14) for the registrant and have:

     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
     material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
     report is being prepared.

     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
     and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
     this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
     evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

     5.  I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
     record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
     identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
     internal controls; and

     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
     other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
     internal controls; and

     6.  I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there
were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that
could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our
most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: May 20, 2004              /S/ Randall Peterson
                                ----------------------------------------
                                Randall Peterson,
                                Chief Executive Officer and President
Director of Flight Standards Federal Aviation Administration Dear Director, The Collings Foundation, a non - profit 501C3 education Foundation is holder of exemption letter 6540, which provides exemption from 91.315, 91.319(a), 119.5(g) and 119.21(a) of Ti tle 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), which permits the Collings Foundation to operate our Boeing B - 17, Consolidated B - 24, North American B - 25, Grumman TBM, Bell UH - 1, McDonnell Douglas F - 4 , McDonnell Douglas TA - 4J and Fieseler Co. Fi - 156 Storch fo r the purpose of carrying passengers on local flights for compensation or hire. On behalf of the Collings Foundation I am submitting a petition to the FAA for renewal and extension of our existing exemption letter 6540N, which expires on March 31, 2016. The Collings Foundation has held exemption letter 6540 since November 8, 1996 and has provided many people the opportunity to fly on board historic aircraft. Many of these riders have been WWII, Korea and Vietnam veterans, their children and grandchildren. Safety of flight is of critical importance to all Collings Foundation flight operations; we have over 26 years and thousands of flight hours of experience with the “Wings of Freedom” Tour (B - 17, B - 24 and B - 25) and 16 years of experience with the “Vietna m Memorial Flight” (F - 4, TA - 4 and UH - 1) without a single accident or injury to either passengers or viewers. The Collings Foundation has over 85,000 members, all with an interest and passion for keeping these icons flying and touring around for all to see. Warmest Regards, /s/ Rob Collings Executive Director The Collings Foundation 137 Barton Rd. Stow, Ma. 01775 617 - 510 - 5237
H. R. 4571

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four

An Act

To designate the United States Post Office building located at 103–104 Estate

Richmond in Saint Croix, Virgin Islands, as the ‘‘Wilbert Armstrong Post Office’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The United States Post Office building located at 103–104

Estate Richmond in Saint Croix, Virgin Islands, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘Wilbert Armstrong Post Office’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the building referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the Wilbert

Armstrong Post Office.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
5 November 2015

315P15

#### Quality Built Homes Incorporated and Stafford Land Company, Inc. v. Town of Carthage

1. Pits’ PDR under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-115)

1. Allowed

2. Def’s Conditional PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

2. Allowed

3. Motion of the N.C. Home Builder’s Association for Leave to File *Amicus Curiae*Brief

3. Allowed

4. Motion of the Leading Builders of America for Leave to File *Amicus Curiae*Brief

4. Allowed