alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4647 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4647

   To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey to the City of 
Imperial Beach, California, approximately 1 acre of land in the Tijuana 
                    Slough National Wildlife Refuge.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 24, 1994

  Ms. Schenk introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey to the City of 
Imperial Beach, California, approximately 1 acre of land in the Tijuana 
                    Slough National Wildlife Refuge.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF LAND IN TIJUANA SLOUGH NATIONAL WILDLIFE 
              REFUGE.

    (a) Requirement.--The Secretary of the Interior shall expeditiously 
convey to the City of Imperial Beach, California, without compensation, 
all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to 
approximately 1 acre of land in the Tijuana Slough National Wildlife 
Refuge, as depicted on a United States Fish and Wildlife Service map 
entitled ``T-ball Field, Tijuana Slough National Wildlife Refuge'', 
dated June 1994, for use as a public recreational area.
    (b) Reversionary Interest in the United States.--Upon any date on 
which any of the land in which right, title, and interest is conveyed 
under subsection (a) ceases to be used by the City of Imperial Beach, 
California, for public recreational purposes--
            (1) all such right, title, and interest shall revert to the 
        Government of the United States; and
            (2) such land shall be reincorporated into the Tijuana 
        Slough National Wildlife Refuge.

                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to 10 U.S.C.  Section  1350 as adopted  pursuant to Section 1350 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  in  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of
Electronic  Game Card,  Inc. on Form  10-QSB/A  for the period  ending March 31,
2005, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report") for Electronic Game Card, Inc., (the "Company"),  the undersigned
hereby certifies that:

(1)      to the  best of my  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with  the
         requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

(2)      to the best of my knowledge,  the  information  contained in the Report
         fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and
         result of operations of the Company.

March 7, 2006


/S/ LEE COLE
----------------------------------------
    LEE COLE ACTING PRESIDENT AND ACTING
    CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
#### § 27.801 Scope.

This subpart sets out the regulations governing service in the paired 1392-1395 MHz and 1432-1435 MHz bands as well as the unpaired 1390-1392 MHz band (1.4 GHz band).
Cyber Beacon 2021: The Impacts of a Global Pandemic - https://cic.ndu.edu/cyberbeacon/

Panelist Biography: Dr. David Perlman led the grant review 

committee for the Health Metrics program in the User 

Research team at Twitter, and then worked at Leviathan 

Security Group as a data scientist and helped with planning 

for future threats. He has presented on social media and 

influence campaigns at SOCOM SOFWERX, Black Hat 

conference, Naval Postgraduate School, CDANS, Lawrence 

Livermore National Labs (LLNL), and has been interviewed 

in publications including the Wall Street Journal. He is also 

lead author of the first discussion of social media and 

influence campaigns in the Strategic Latency book series 

published by LLNL, and published an article on the 

mathematics of modern big-data marketing in Cyber 

Defense Review. In addition, he has consulted extensively 

with a DARPA-funded social science research group. His 

doctoral work at the University of Wisconsin-Madison 

researched attention, emotions and identity in the context 

of mindfulness and decision-making. As of 2021 he is 

currently working with a startup which will use blockchain 

technology to securely trade carbon offset credits.
No. 5 4

Brooklyn Center for Psychotherapy,

Inc.,

Appellant,

v.

Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance

Company,

Respondent.

Michael Y. Hawrylchak , for appellant.

Dan D. Kohane , for respondent

.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Certification of a question by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit,

pursuant to section 500.27 of this Court’s Rules of Practice, accepted and the issues

presented are to be considered after briefing and argument. Chief Judge DiFiore and

Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia, Wilson and Feinman concur.

Decided Ma y 7 , 2020
J an et Kenne dy purported to f

ile an appe al on beha lf of Alamo Ranc h, I nc. As a non- 1 lawy er, K ennedy

cannot r epre sent a c orporation. Electronic Data Sy s. Corp. v. Tyson , 862 S.W .2d 72 8, 73 7 ( Te x. Ap p. —D a lla s 1 99 3, no wr it) (“ On ly a lic e ns e d att or ne y c a n ap pe a r a

nd re pr e se nt a corpor at i o n i n litigation.”) . To the extent Alamo Ranch, Inc. is befor e this Court, however , J anet Ke nn e dy purp or ts t o r e pr e se nt i t. A c c or din g ly , all re fe re nc e s to Jane t K e nn e dy in t his op ini on

wi ll encompa ss Alamo Ranch, Inc. 

### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

NO. 03-0 6 -00 235 -CV

Janet K ennedy and Alam o Ranch, Inc. , Appellan ts
v. Bobb y Joe K ennedy, Appellee

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF HAY S COUNTY , 274TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 99- 1437 , HO NORAB LE CHARLES R. RAMSAY , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N
J anet Ke nnedy filed a notice of appe al in this cause on April 24, 2006. On May 17, 1 this Court denied appellant’ s motion for a fr ee a ppellate r ecor d, concluding that the issues raise d by that motion must be presented to the tria l court first. See Te x. R. A pp . P. 20 .1 ; se e als o Tex. Ci v. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 13.003 (West 2002). No re cord ha s been f iled in this cause. On Dec ember

19, 2006, this Court ordered the parties t o file re ports detailing the status of re c or d p re pa

ratio n. Ap pe lle e B ob by

Joe K e nn e dy

fi le d a le tte r d isc la imi nga ny

int e re st i n the c ur re nt a pp e a l, a sse rt ingtha

t it c on c e rn e d only a c la im by int e rv e no r Ric ha rd I hf e & As so c ia te s,2

P.C. (“ the fi rm ” ) f

or fu nd s in the re g istry of the c ourt in w hic h B ob by

Joe K e nn e dy

ha d n o in te re st. By letter, Richar d H. Ihfe state d that he believe d that J anet Ke nnedy had aba ndoned her

appea l and that it is m oot. The firm filed a status report a sserting that his firm obtained a fi nal judg ment for funds in the re g istry

of the c ourt. T h e fi rm re q u es ted that the appe al be dismissed. J anet Kenne dy did not file a status repor t and did not file a re spo n s e to her opponent’s asse rtion that
s h e a b an d o n e d th is a

p p e a l a n d th a t it is mo o t. Ja n e t K e n n e dy h a s n o t s h o w n th a t s h e h as take n the a c tio ns ne c e ssa

ry to o bta in a

re c or d in thi s a pp e a l. We gr ant appe llee’s motion and dismiss thi s appea l.

G. Alan Waldrop, Just ice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Pemberton and Waldrop Dismissed on Appellee’ s Motion Filed: F ebrua

ry 23, 2007
§ 78.104 Authorized bandwidth and emission designator. ( a ) The authorized bandwidth permitted to be used by a CARS station and specified in the station license shall be the occupied or necessary bandwidth, whichever is greater, except when otherwise authorized by the Commission in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) As an exception to the provision of paragraph (a) of this section, the Commission may approve requests to base the authorized bandwidth for the station on the lesser of the occupied or necessary bandwidth where a persuasive showing is made that: ( 1 ) The frequency stability of the transmitting equipment to be used will permit compliance with § 78.103(b)(1) and, additionally, will permit 99 percent of the total radiated power to be kept within the frequency limits of the assigned channel.
( c ) The emission designator shall be specified in terms of the necessary bandwidth. (See § 2.201(a) of this chapter.)
[39 FR 26025, July 16, 1974, as amended at 45 FR 78694, Nov. 26, 1980]
#### § 76.1207 Waivers.

The Commission may waive a regulation adopted under this subpart for a limited time, upon an appropriate showing by a provider of multichannel video programming and other services offered over multichannel video programming systems, or an equipment provider that such a waiver is necessary to assist the development or introduction of a new or improved multichannel video programming or other service offered over multichannel video programming systems, technology, or products. Such waiver requests should be made pursuant to § 76.7. Such a waiver shall be effective for all service providers and products in the category in which the waiver is granted.
Order entered April 21, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00143-CR

TORRY GOODSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F13-62599-K

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

This Court twice abated the appeal for findings regarding supplementation of the record 

with the jury notes. On April 20, 2016, we received a supplemental record containing the jury 

notes and the trial court’s response to the notes. Accordingly, the appeal may now proceed.

We ORDER appellant to file his brief within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to counsel for all parties.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
No. 10-10774.

#### Watson *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 164 (Thursday, August 24, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 50113]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7113]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Sixth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 206: Aeronautical 
Information Services Data Link

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 206 meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 206: Aeronautical Information 
Services Data Link.

DATES: The meeting will be held September 11-15, 2006, from 9 a.m. to 5 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC, 20036-5133; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax 
(202) 833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (P.L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is 
hereby given for a Special Committee 206 meeting. The agenda will 
include:

<bullet> September 11:
    <bullet> Opening Session (Chairman's Remarks and Introductions, 
Review and Approve Meeting Agenda and Minutes, Discussion, Action Item 
Review).
    <bullet> Presentations:
    <bullet> Robert Grapple--Data Link Applications Coding.
    <bullet> Robert Grapple--Open System Protocols for Aviation for 
Aviation Data Link Applications.
    <bullet> John Loynes or Jim Dieudoene--FAA SWIM and it's 
Relationship to AIS and Weather.
    <bullet> Doug Arbuckle--NGATS AIS Vision and Shared Situation 
Awareness.
    <bullet> Robert Swain--ADS-B UAT Broadcast Services Infrastructure.
    <bullet> Breakout meetings of Subgroup 1 and Subgroup 2.
<bullet> September 12-14:
    <bullet> Subgroup 1 and Subgroup 2 Meetings.
<bullet> September 15:
    <bullet> Subgroup 1 and Subgroup 2 Meetings.
    <bullet> Closing Session (Other Business, Chairman Wrap Up and 
Conclusions, Date and Place of Next Meeting, Closing Remarks, Adjourn).

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Dated: Issued in Washington, DC, on August 14, 2006.
Francisco, Estrada C.,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 06-7113 Filed 8-23-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Broadcasting Board of Governors

*Date and Time:*                     July 11, 2000; 9:30 A.M.-5 P.M. July 12, 2000; 9 A.M.-11 A.M.                

*Place:*                     Cohen Building, Room 3321, 330 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20237.                

*Closed Meeting:*                     The members of the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) will meet in closed session to review and discuss a number of issues relating to U.S. Government-funded nonmilitary international broadcasting. They will address internal procedural, budgetary, and personnel issues, as well as sensitive foreign policy issues relating to potential options in the U.S. international broadcasting field. This meeting is closed because if open it likely would either disclose matters that would be properly classified to be kept secret in the interest of foreign policy under the appropriate executive order (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(1)) or would disclose information the premature disclosure of which would be likely to significantly frustrate implementation of a proposed agency action. (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(9)(B)) In addition, part of the discussion will relate solely to the internal personnel and organizational issues of the BBG or the International Broadcasting Bureau. (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c) (2) and (6))                

*Contact Person for More Information:*                     Persons interested in obtaining more information should contact either Brenda Hardnett or John Lindburg at (202) 401-3736.                

Dated: June 30, 2000.

John A. Lindburg,

Legal Counsel.

[FR Doc. 00-17103 Filed 6-30-00; 2:48 am]

BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Fiscal Service

# AGENCY:

Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This is Supplement No. 5 to the Treasury Department Circular 570; 2005 Revision, published July 1, 2005, at 70 FR 38502.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-7102.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the Certificate of Authority issued by the Treasury to the above named Company under the United States Code, title 31, Sections 9304-9308, to qualify as an acceptable surety on Federal bonds is terminated effective today.

The Company was last listed as an acceptable surety on Federal bonds at 70 FR 38502 on page 38542, July 1, 2005.

With respect to any bonds currently in force with above listed company, bond-approving officers may let such bonds run to expiration and need not secure new bonds. However, no new bonds should be accepted from the Company. In addition, bonds that are continuous in nature should not be renewed.

                    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at                     *http://www.fms.treas.gov/​c570.*                     A hard copy may be purchased from the government Printing Office (GPO), Subscription Service, Washington, DC, telephone (202) 512-1800. When ordering the Circular from GPO, use the following stock number: 769-004-05219-0.                

Questions concerning this notice may be directed to the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West Highway, Room 6F01, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

Vivian L. Cooper,

Director, Financial Accounting and Services Division, Financial Management Service.

[FR Doc. 06-714  Filed 1-25-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
#### § 24.200 Scope.

This subpart sets out the regulations governing the licensing and operations of personal communications services authorized in the 1850-1910 and 1930-1990 MHz bands.
§ 54.1309 National and study area average unseparated loop costs. ( a ) *National average unseparated loop cost per working loop.* Except as provided in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section, this is equal to the sum of the Loop Costs for each study area in the country as calculated pursuant to § 54.1308(a) divided by the sum of the working loops reported in § 54.1305(h) for each study area in the country. The national average unseparated loop cost per working loop shall be calculated by the National Exchange Carrier Association. Until June 30, 2015 the national average unseparated loop cost for purposes of calculating expense adjustments for rural incumbent local exchange carriers, as that term is defined in § 54.5 is frozen at $240.00. ( 1 ) The national average unseparated loop cost per working loop shall be recalculated by the National Exchange Carrier Association to reflect the September, December, and March update filings.
( 2 ) Each new nationwide average shall be used in determining the additional interstate expense allocation for companies which made filings by the most recent filing date.
( 3 ) The calculation of a new national average to reflect the update filings shall not affect the amount of the additional interstate expense allocation for companies which did not make an update filing by the most recent filing date.
( b ) *Study area average unseparated loop cost per working loop.* This is equal to the unseparated loop costs for the study area as calculated pursuant to § 54.1308(a) divided by the number of working loops reported in § 54.1305(i) for the study area.
( c ) Until June 30, 2015, the national average unseparated loop Cost per working loop shall be the greater of: ( 1 ) The amount calculated pursuant to the method described in paragraph (a) of this section; or
( 2 ) An amount calculated to produce the maximum rural incumbent local exchange carrier portion of the nationwide loop cost expense adjustment allowable pursuant to § 54.1302(a).
( d ) Beginning July 1, 2015, the national average unseparated loop cost per working loop shall be frozen at the national average unseparated loop cost per working loop as recalculated by the National Exchange Carrier Association to reflect the March 2015 update filing.
[79 FR 39190, July 9, 2014, as amended at 80 FR 4479, Jan. 27, 2015; 89 FR 25163, Apr. 10, 2024]