alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            College of Information and Cyberspace
                    National Defense University
                CIC
        Search
                    Search CIC:
                        Search
                Search CIC:
                    Search
    Home

    About 
        Mission & Vision

    Faculty & Staff

    Fact Sheet

    Alumni

    Internships

    FAQ

    Admissions 
        Eligibility Requirements

    Admissions Calendar

    Application Instructions

    Apply Online

    International Students

    Academics 
        Graduate Catalog

    M.S. in Strategic Information and Cyberspace Studies
        
        JPME Master's Degree

    Cyber Workforce Master's Degree (Part Time)

    Leadership Development Programs

    Graduate Certificates

    Academic Partners

    Current Students 
        JPME II  Incoming Students

    LDP Incoming Students

    Student Registration

    Bring Your Own Device

    IA Compliance

    Completion Procedures / Order Transcripts

    Student Services and Resources

    Events
    
        Cyber Beacon

    Cyber PME Colloquium

    Hopper Award

    Lecture Series

    CYBERCOM Symposium

    NEWS

    UC2
    
        About

    Events

    Work With Us

    Center for Cybersecurity
    
        About

    Cybersecurity Center POC

    Cybersecurity Supporting Faculty

    CAE-CDE CISO Certificate Program

    Cybersecurity Trending News

    Cyber Labs
        
        Ethical Hacking

    Critical Infrastructure - SCADA

    Cyber Exercises
        
        Tabletop Exercise

    Cyber Competitions

    Cyber Resources and Awareness

    Stakeholder / Industry Advisory Council

    Contact 
        Contact Us

    Directions

    Access to Ft. McNair

    Map of Ft. McNair  Home
  NEWS
  News & Announcements
 News & Announcements Download
 Details
 Share
 News
 National Cyber Director at Cyber Beacon 2021
 Chris Inglis, the first National Cyber Director, is a keynote speaker for the 8th annual Cyber Beacon Conference, hosted by the National Defense University's College of Information and Cyberspace on 9 December 2021. Find the full agenda here: https://cic.ndu.edu/cyberbeacon/
 SHARE
 PRINT
 National Defense University


College of Information and Cyberspace

300 Fifth Ave., Bldg. 62
Fort Lesley J. McNair
Washington, DC 20319-5066

202-685-6300
                    Stay Connected
                
                
                DOD Privacy & Security
 DOD Links Disclaimer
 DOD Social Media Policy
 DOD Web Policy
 FOIA
 NDU System of Records Notice
 NDU Privacy & Security Notice
 No FEAR Act
 Open GOV
 Plain Writing Act
 Section 508
 Small Business Act
 USA.gov
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
No. 11-10168.

#### Cox *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
SUPREME COURT.

#### The Erie Railway Company and James Fisk, Jr., agt. Marshall B. Champlain and others.

On an application for an order appointing a referee to take an *affidavit*or *deposition*of a person who refuses to make the same, to be used on a motion *(Code,*§ 401, *sub. 7),*no *notice*is required to be given to the adverse party to the action of such application; and such party has not the right to appear before the referee to cross-examine the person making the deposition.

Neither can the adverse party make a motion to set aside or vacate the order made on such application; the person whose deposition is desired is the only one who can make such a motion.

*Otsego Special*Term, *April,*1868.

Motion by defendants to set aside an order dated the 28th day of March, 1868, appointing Amasa A. Redfield, Esq., referee to take the depositions of Cornelius Vanderbilt and others, to be used upon a motion in this action to suspend Frank Work from his office as director of the Erie Railway Company. The order was granted pursuant to subdivision 7 of section 401 of the Code, upon affidavits that Vanderbilt and the others named in the order had refused to make affidavits.

Lewis Seymour, *for plaintiffs.*

Samuel Edick, *for defendants.*

Balcom, J.

The plaintiffs’ counsel raises the question that the defendants cannot make this motion, and he insists that such a motion can be made only by the persons whose depositions the referee is required to take. The provision of the Code under which the order was made is: “When any *74party intends to make or oppose a motion in any court of record, and it shall be necessary for him to have the affidavit of any person who shall have refused to make the same, such court may by order appoint a referee to take the affidavit or deposition of such person.” *(Code, %*401, *sub.*7.) No notice is required to be given to the adverse party to an action of the application for such an order, and such party has not the right to appear before the referee to cross-examine the person making the deposition. The order is a matter exclusively between the party that obtains it and the person whose deposition is desired; and I am of the opinion such person only can move to have it vacated. The party obtaining it should not be embarrassed by any motion of the adverse party to set it aside.

For these reasons, the defendant’s motion to set aside the order of the 28th of March last, appointing Redfield referee to take the depositions of Vanderbilt and others, is denied, with *$10*costs. ’
# MAJ Frederick Pack IV

### Military Faculty

### 

### 

Major Frederick L. Pack IV is a member of the military faculty and the Director of Operations at the College of Information and Cyberspace, National Defense University, Fort Lesley J. McNair, DC. He oversees day-to-day operations for the college, including academic and program support and the 868-thousand-dollar budget. Additionally, he has instructor duties for several graduate courses within the college’s curriculum.  

Major Pack began his career by enlisting in the Air Force in 2002 and served as a Computer Systems Programmer. He was stationed at Maxwell AFB-Gunter Annex developing business systems and working in software security before being assigned to the White House Communications Agency in 2010. In 2013, Major Pack attended Officer Training School and was commissioned as a Cyberspace Operations Officer. He has served in a variety of operational and staff assignments, including base communications, coalition partnership building, and the intelligence community. Prior to his current position, Major Pack was the Chief of Cybersecurity for Air Force Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Systems at Headquarters Air Force. Major Pack has been stationed at various locations and deployed three times during his career.

Major Pack holds a B.S. in Computer Science from Troy University and a M.S. in Technology Management from the Florida Institute of Technology. He also holds a Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP) certification since 2015.
794 A.2d 119

#### IN THE MATTER OF RICHARD W. AGEE, A/K/A R. WESLEY AGEE, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

April 2, 2002.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 01-097, recommending that RICHARD W. AGEE, a/k/a R. WESLEY AGEE, formerly of EAST ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1976, and who thereafter was suspended from the practice of law for a period of two years by Order of the Court filed on January 26, 1998, and who remains suspended at this time, should be disbarred for violating *RPC*1.15(d) (knowing misappropriation), *Rule*1:21-6 (recordkeeping violations) and *RPC*8.4(c) (misrepresentation);

And RICHARD W. AGEE, a/k/a R. WESLEY AGEE, having been ordered to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that RICHARD W. AGEE, a/k/a R. WESLEY AGEE, be disbarred, effective immediately, and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by RICHARD W. AGEE, a/k/a R. WESLEY AGEE, pursuant to *Rule*1:21-6 be restrained from disbursement except on application to this Court for good cause shown and shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court, who is directed to deposit the funds in the Superior Court Trust Fund pending further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

*343ORDERED that RICHARD W. AGEE, a/k/a R. WESLEY AGEE, be and hereby is permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
#### § 73.4215 Program matter: Supplier identification.

See Public Notice, FCC 73-595, dated June 1, 1973. 41 FCC 2d 333; 38 FR 14979, June 7, 1973.

[44 FR 36389, June 22, 1979]
§ 73.6022 Negotiated interference and relocation agreements. ( a ) Notwithstanding the technical criteria in this subpart J of this part, subpart E of this part, and subpart G of part 74 of this chapter regarding interference protection to and from Class A TV stations, Class A TV stations may negotiate agreements with parties of authorized and proposed TV, LPTV, TV translator, Class A TV stations or other affected parties to resolve interference concerns; *provided,* however, other relevant requirements are met with respect to the parties to the agreement. A written and signed agreement must be submitted with each application or other request for action by the Commission. Negotiated agreements under this paragraph can include the exchange of money or other considerations from one entity to another. Applications submitted pursuant to the provisions of this paragraph (a) will be granted only if the Commission finds that such action is consistent with the public interest.
( b ) [Reserved]
[89 FR 7263, Feb. 1, 2024]
# iCollege Has a NEW Mission Statement !!! 

/ Published March 20, 2015
Effective immediately, the iCollege's mission statement will go From:  Prepare military and civilian leaders to optimize information technology management and secure information dominance within cyberspace.   To this...  Our NEW MISSION STATEMENT:
**Educate and prepare selected military and civilian leaders and advisors to develop and implement cyberspace strategies, and to leverage information and technology to advance national and global security.**
You will begin to see this new mission statement on all iCollege materials.   We believe this new statement better aligns and describes the priorities, stakeholders, and educational offerings the college focuses on.  We offer education in Cyber, CIO, CFO, ITPM, EA, and related competencies.  Please refer to the Programs page of our website for detailed information on specific programs, courses, and the academic schedule.
Summary of Analytical Results(662 - May 2010)Sample ID662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRABDate5/3/10 5/10/10 5/17/10 5/24/10Top (ft)0000Total (T)/Bottom (ft)0000Analyteunits Diss. (D) Duplicate #1111PFOA ug/L T 6.43 11.8 9.30 6.54Samples were analyzed by Critical Path Services. Reported resultsPFOA = Perfluorooctanoic Acidug/L = micrograms per literrepresent the average (rounded) of analysis in triplicate.< and ND = Non detect at stated reporting limitPage 1 of 1cwk 662 grab results_may10.xls:Sheet17/23/2010 9:19 AM
Editorial Note on Part 36
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 74 FR 23956, May 22, 2009, 77 FR 30411, May 23, 2012, 82 FR 25538, June 2, 2017, and corrected at 83 FR 4153, Jan. 30, 2018. Nomenclature changes to part 36 also appear at 83 FR 63587, Dec. 11, 2018, and 84 FR 4360, Feb. 15, 2019.

§ 36.4 Streamlining procedures for processing petitions for waiver of study area boundaries. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 25158 , Apr. 10, 2024.
Effective January 1, 2012, local exchange carriers seeking a change in study area boundaries shall be subject to the following procedure: ( a ) *Public Notice and Review Period.* Upon determination by the Wireline Competition Bureau that a petitioner has filed a complete petition for study area waiver and that the petition is appropriate for streamlined treatment, the Wireline Competition Bureau will issue a public notice seeking comment on the petition. Unless otherwise notified by the Wireline Competition Bureau, the petitioner is permitted to alter its study area boundaries on the 60th day after the reply comment due date, but only in accordance with the boundary changes proposed in its application.
( b ) *Comment Cycle.* Comments on petitions for waiver may be filed during the first 30 days following public notice, and reply comments may be filed during the first 45 days following public notice, unless the public notice specifies a different pleading cycle. All comments on petitions for waiver shall be filed electronically, and shall satisfy such other filing requirements as may be specified in the public notice.
[76 FR 73853, Nov. 29, 2011]
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, James R. Lavelle, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge, Cotelligent, Inc.s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cotelligent, Inc.



|                     |  |     |  |                                                  
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 15, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ James R. Lavelle                             
|                     |  |     |  | James R. Lavelle                                 
|                     |  |     |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7585** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. MICHAEL FOREMAN , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore
. James K. Bredar , District Judge. ( 1:11

- cr - 00398

- JKB

- 1 , 1:15

- cv - 01258

- JKB )

Submitted : February 25, 2016 Decided: March 1, 2016

Before SHEDD and HARRIS , Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Michael Foreman, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin M. Block , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Henry Brandis Marsh, Jr., Special Assistant U nited States Attorn ey , Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Michael Foreman seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order is not appeal able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion st ates a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that
Foreman has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability , deny Foreman’s motion for an order directing the district court to explain the sentence, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the fa cts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the3 materials before th is court and argument wo uld not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
v068383_ex10-4 -- Converted by SECPublisher 2.1.1.8, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing


     

    Exhibit
      10.4
NOTICE 

«TRACK» 

NO. 65014 

THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE 300TH DISTRICT COURT 

 

VS. OF 

 

 JUAN RUBEN GARCIA BRAZORIA COUNTY, TEXAS 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT ON APPEAL 

 ON THE 12TH day of JANUARY, 2015, the defendant in the above styled and 

numbered cause excepted to the order of the Court in said cause and gave Notice of Appeal to 

the Court of Appeals, FIRST Judicial District. 

Date of Judgment or Other Order Appealed From: 10/20/14 

Date of Sentencing: 10/20/14 

Name of Trial Court Judge: K. RANDALL HUFSTETLER 

Name of Court Reporter: RENEE RAPE 

Name and Address of Defense Attorney on Appeal: 

 STANLEY G. SCHNEIDER (RETAINED) 

 440 LOUISIANA, SUITE 800 

 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002 

Name and Address of Attorney for the State on Appeal: 

 Jeri Yenne, District Attorney 

 Brazoria County Courthouse 

 111 East Locust, Suite 408-A 

 Angleton, TX 77515 

Defendant Incarcerated? UNKNOWN 

 (possibly held by U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement) 

Motion for New Trial Filed? 11/17/14 

Appeal Bond: N/A Date N/A 

Offense and Punishment: AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT OF A CHILD; CRIMINAL 

EPISODE; Ten (10) YEARS – TDCJ-ID 

 RHONDA BARCHAK, District Clerk 

 By /S/ KATHLEEN MCDOUGALD 

 Deputy 

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 1/13/2015 11:39:42 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
No. 11-8371.

#### Garcia *v.*California.

Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.
§ 51-6.3 Long-term procurements. ( a ) Contracting activities are encouraged to investigate long-term ordering agreements for commodities listed on the Procurement List to level off demand, thereby helping ensure stability of employment and development of job skills for persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.
( b ) Contracting activities are encouraged to use the longest contract term available by law to their agencies for contracts for commodities and services under the AbilityOne Program, in order to minimize the time and expense devoted to formation and renewal of these contracts.
[56 FR 48983, Sept. 26, 1991, as amended at 62 FR 32237, June 13, 1997; 71 FR 68494, Nov. 27, 2006]
#### Fox, Appellant, *v.*Pasco et al.

*230Argued October 3, 1949.

Before Maxey, C. J., Drew, Linn, Patterson, Stearne and Jones, JJ.

*Charles F. Dean,*for plaintiff, appellant.

*Sanford M. Chilcote,*with him *Dickie, Robinson*c6 *McCamey,*for Walter J. Pasco, defendant, appellee.

November 14, 1949:

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Edward Pox, plaintiff, brought this action against Walter Pasco, defendant, to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from a head-on collision between a truck owned and operated by defendant and an automobile owned by Allegheny County in which plaintiff was a passenger. The jury returned a verdict for defendant and plaintiff now appeals.

Plaintiff’s sole argument is that the charge to which he took only a general exception, contained errors and omissions. This case is clearly ruled by *Steele v. France,*363 Pa. 165, 69 A. 2d 368, and *Voitasefski v. Pittsburgh Rwys. Co.,*363 Pa. 220, 69 A. 2d 370, where we restated the well-established principle that under a general exception only basic and fundamental errors ,ill be considered by this Court. Here, the learned trial judge carefully and completely summarized the evidence. His statement of the law was equally clear, correct and unbiased. Cer*231tainly under a general exception, plaintiff may not complain that a charge as thorough and unprejudiced as this one failed to emphasize sufficiently his position.

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002,
      I, David Goldenberg, Interim Chief Financial Officer of Advanced ID Corporation
      (the “Company"), hereby certify, that to the best of my knowledge, the Annual
      report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2005
      (the
      "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of the Company.


Date:
              March 30, 2006
            By:
            /s/ David
              GoldenbergDavid
              GoldenbergInterim
              Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Lawrence H. Hayward, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
Leslies Poolmart, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 2, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form
10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Leslies Poolmart, Inc.



By:

/s/ Lawrence H. HaywardName:

Lawrence H. HaywardTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer




I, Donald J. Anderson, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Leslies Poolmart, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 2, 2004 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Leslies Poolmart, Inc.



By:

/s/ Donald J. AndersonName:

Donald J. AndersonTitle:

Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial
Officer
Amendment 5 to HomeBanc Corp. 2004 Director Compensation Plan




 EXHIBIT 10.7(vi) 
 AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO THE HOMEBANC CORP. 
 2004 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PLAN 
 This Amendment No. 5 to the HomeBanc Corp. 2004 Director Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) is made and entered into as of this 12th day of
January, 2007, by HomeBanc Corp. (the “Company”). 
 Pursuant to a resolution of the Board of Directors of the Company, in
accordance with Article 7 of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 
  

	 	1.	By deleting “$25,000” in the line in the table in Section 5.2 with respect to the Supplemental Annual Retainer payable to the Presiding/Lead Director and replacing it
with “$30,000.” 

  

	 	2.	Except as specifically set forth herein, the terms of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect as prior to this amendment. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized officer as of the date first above written. 

 

			
	HOMEBANC CORP.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ CHARLES W. MCGUIRE

	Name:	 	Charles W. McGuire
	Title:	 	Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary