alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.2


    Exhibit
      10.2

    
 

    Sales
      Agreement

    


    This
      agreement is entered into by and between the Jiangxi Taina Nanfeng Orange
      Limited (hereinafter called ‘the Jiangxi Taina’) and the Liaoning Shenyang
      Yunpeng Fruits Limted (hereinafter called ‘the Yunpeng Fruits’). 

    Both
      parties have reached the following agreement on selling Nanfeng tangerine orange
      in the three provinces in Northeast China in 2007, on the basis of the
      principles of equality, cooperation, mutual benefits and win-win
      results:

     

    I.
      Distributed brand: to distribute original Taina-branded Nanfeng tangerine
      orange;

     

    II.
      Sales
      volume: 3,000 tons

     

    III.
      Sales price: to deliver the products at a 6%-off prevailing market
      price;

     

    IV.
      Settlement: to make the payment upon the delivery to the address specified
      by
      the Yunpeng Fruits in written;

     

    V.
      Region
      of distribution: the three provinces in Northeast China;

     

    VI.
      Other
      arrangements: Warm-up facilities have to be utilized in the process of transport
      to ensure no freezing suffered by tangerine orange after arrival;

     

    VII.
      Responsibility of breach: The Jiangxi Taina shall be under penalty of RMB 0.2
      yuan per 500 grams, if the quality of tangerine orange it delivers fails to
      meet
      the requirements of the Yunpeng Fruits; 

     

    
      VIII.
        This agreement shall be made in duplicate, each maintaining one of the copies,
        and shall come into force since the date when it is signed and sealed by
        both
        parties. 

    

     

    


    Jiangxi
      Taina (Corporate chop) Yunpeng Fruits (Corporate Chop) 

    


    Signed
      by
      representative:    Signed
      by
      representative: 

    


    


    Date:
      Feb. 6, 2007     Date:
      Feb. 6, 2007
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) SSI Technology, Inc. ) ) Under Contract No. W56HZV-12-C-0058 )
APPEARANCE FORTHE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 60088

Bret S. Wacker, Esq.

Clark Hill PLC Washington, DC Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.

Army ChiefTrial Attorney MAJ Julie A. Glascott, JA

Trial Attorney ORDER OF DISMISSAL Appellant appealed from a 24 April 2015 contracting officer's letter which purported to be a final decision, and the Board docketed the appeal as ASBCA No. 60088. By letter dated 10 August 2015, appellant informed the Board that the contracting officer's 24 April 2015 decision had been rescinded, and appellant requested to withdraw its appeal. The government does not objectto appellant's request. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed withoutprejudice. Dated: 25 August 2015

# ~~ / MARK N. STEMPLE Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals in ASBCANo. 60088, Appeal ofSSI Technology, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
Filed 3/22/18 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2018 ND 74

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Kellen Everad Redtomahawk, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20170353

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable David E. Reich, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Ryan A. Keefe, Assistant State’s Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

William R. Thomason, Bismarck, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.

State v. Redtomahawk

No. 20170353

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Kellen Everad Redtomahawk appealed a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of robbery, a class B felony. On appeal, Redtomahawk argues the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jon J. Jensen

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers

Jerod E. Tufte
No. 11-9075.

#### Keller v. United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.925 Waivers. ( a ) *Waiver requests generally.* The Commission may waive specific requirements of the rules on its own motion or upon request. The fees for such waiver requests are set forth in § 1.1102 of this part.
( b ) *Procedure and format for filing waiver requests.* ( 1 ) Requests for waiver of rules associated with licenses or applications in the Wireless Radio Services must be filed on FCC Form 601, 603, or 605.
( 2 ) Requests for waiver must contain a complete explanation as to why the waiver is desired. If the information necessary to support a waiver request is already on file, the applicant may cross-reference the specific filing where the information may be found.
( 3 ) The Commission may grant a request for waiver if it is shown that: ( i ) The underlying purpose of the rule(s) would not be served or would be frustrated by application to the instant case, and that a grant of the requested waiver would be in the public interest; or
( ii ) In view of unique or unusual factual circumstances of the instant case, application of the rule(s) would be inequitable, unduly burdensome or contrary to the public interest, or the applicant has no reasonable alternative.
( 4 ) Applicants requiring expedited processing of their request for waiver shall clearly caption their request for waiver with the words “WAIVER—EXPEDITED ACTION REQUESTED.”
( c ) *Action on Waiver Requests.* ( i ) The Commission, in its discretion, may give public notice of the filing of a waiver request and seek comment from the public or affected parties.
( ii ) Denial of a rule waiver request associated with an application renders that application defective unless it contains an alternative proposal that fully complies with the rules, in which event, the application will be processed using the alternative proposal as if the waiver had not been requested. Applications rendered defective may be dismissed without prejudice.
[63 FR 68926, Dec. 14, 1998]
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

   Written Statement of Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial
  Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
                                  Section 1350)

     The undersigned, the Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial
Officer of the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority (the "Authority"), hereby
certifies that, to his knowledge, on the date hereof:

     (a)  the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Authority for the Fiscal Year
          Ended September 30, 2001 filed on the date hereof with the Securities
          and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934; and

     (b)  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
          Authority.



                                    /s/ Jeffrey E. Hartmann
                                    --------------------------
                                    Jeffrey E. Hartmann
                                    Executive Vice President, Finance and
                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                    November 12, 2002
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 6, 2017

No. 04-16-00839-CR

IN RE Richard LARES

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

On December 29, 2016, Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The petition 

complains the trial court has not ruled on a motion Relator filed on September 18, 2016 entitled 

“11.074 Motion for Counsel.” Relator seeks a writ of mandamus directing the trial judge to rule 

on the motion. At the time the mandamus was filed, the Honorable Ray Olivarri was the 

presiding judge of the 399th District Court of Bexar County, Texas. However, Judge Olivarri is 

no longer the presiding judge of the 399th District Court. 

Pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we ABATE this proceeding for thirty 

days from the date of this order to allow the newly elected judge of the 399th District Court of 

Bexar County, Texas to consider Relator’s motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 7.2(b) (“If the case is an 

original proceeding under Rule 52, the court must abate the proceeding to allow the successor to 

reconsider the original party’s decision.”). The trial judge is directed to consider the motion in 

question and determine what action, if any to take upon said motion. 

Relator is ORDERED to file in this court either the appropriate motion to dismiss this 

original proceeding or an amended petition for writ of mandamus and appendix no later than 

fourteen days following the expiration of the thirty-day abatement.

It is so ORDERED on January 6, 2017.

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2006CR10110, styled The State of Texas v. Richard Lares, pending in the 

399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Ray Olivarri presiding.
PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ________________________________

 Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            College of Information and Cyberspace
                    National Defense University
                CIC
        Search
                    Search CIC:
                        Search
                Search CIC:
                    Search
    Home

    About 
        Mission & Vision

    Faculty & Staff

    Fact Sheet

    Alumni

    Internships

    FAQ

    Admissions 
        Eligibility Requirements

    Admissions Calendar

    Application Instructions

    Apply Online

    International Students

    Academics 
        Graduate Catalog

    JPME Master Degree

    Distance Learning Master Degree

    Leadership Development Programs

    Graduate Certificates

    Academic Partners

    Current Students 
        JPME II  Incoming Students

    LDP Incoming Students

    Student Registration

    Bring Your Own Device

    IA Compliance

    Completion Procedures / Order Transcripts

    Student Services and Resources

    Events
    
        Cyber Beacon

    Cyber PME Colloquium

    Hopper Award

    Lecture Series

    CYBERCOM Symposium

    NEWS

    UC2
    
        About

    Events

    Work With Us

    Center for Cybersecurity
    
        About

    Cybersecurity Center POC

    Cybersecurity Supporting Faculty

    CAE-CDE CISO Certificate Program

    Cybersecurity Trending News

    Cyber Labs
        
        Ethical Hacking

    Critical Infrastructure - SCADA

    Cyber Exercises
        
        Tabletop Exercise

    Cyber Competitions

    Cyber Resources and Awareness

    Stakeholder / Industry Advisory Council

    Contact 
        Contact Us

    Directions

    Access to Ft. McNair

    Map of Ft. McNair  Home
  NEWS
  News & Announcements
 News & Announcements Download
 Details
 Share
 News
 The Chancellor's Speaker Series 2022 By Minister of Defense of Estonia
                Chancellor Speaker Series
 
 SHARE
 PRINT
 National Defense University


College of Information and Cyberspace

300 Fifth Ave., Bldg. 62
Fort Lesley J. McNair
Washington, DC 20319-5066

202-685-6300
                    Stay Connected
                
                
                DOD Privacy & Security
 DOD Links Disclaimer
 DOD Social Media Policy
 DOD Web Policy
 FOIA
 NDU System of Records Notice
 NDU Privacy & Security Notice
 No FEAR Act
 Open GOV
 Plain Writing Act
 Section 508
 Small Business Act
 USA.gov
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the annual report of  International  DisplayWorks,  Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K/A-1 for the period ending October 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report").
We, Thomas A. Lacey, Chief Executive Officer and Ian Bebbington, Chief Financial
Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
our knowledge and belief:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                        /s/ Thomas A. Lacey
July 21, 2005           ------------------------------------------
                        Thomas A. Lacey,
                        Chief Executive Officer
                        (Principal Executive Officer)


                        /s/ Jeff Winzeler
                        ------------------------------------------
                        Jeff Winzeler,
                        Chief Financial Officer
                        (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**






CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Palomar Enterprises Inc., a Nevada
      corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period
      ended  September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steve Bonenberger,
      President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




PALOMAR
      ENTERPRISES INC.




Dated:
      November 7 ,
      2007 /s/
      Steve
      Bonenberger


By: Steve Bonenberger, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
404 A.2d 1350

#### Gaster v. Elderkin et ux., Appellants. Elderkin et ux., Appellants, v. Gaster.

Submitted June 12, 1978.

John M. Cleary, for appellants; Dale A. Betty, for appellee.

Order affirmed.

CERCONE, P. J., concurred in the result.

JACOBS, former P. J., and HOFFMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 407 5

_____________________________
M .F., Father o f A.O
., L.F.
, and L.F
., Minor Children
, Appellant,

v.

D EPARTMENT OF C HILDREN AND F AMILIES , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Gadsden County

. Francis Allman , Judge

. June 4, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. R OWE , J AY , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Valarie Linnen, Jacksonville
, for Appellant.

Sarah J. Rumph of Children's Legal Services, Tallahassee; Thomasina F. Moore, Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb of the Guardian ad Litem, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer of


Commercial
      National Financial Corporation


Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
      connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Commercial National Financial
      Corporation (the “Corporation”) for the period ending December 31, 2005 (the
“Report”), I, Gregg E. Hunter, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
                15 (d) of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Commercial
                National Financial Corporation.








/s/
                Gregg E. HunterGregg
                E. HunterChief
                Executive OfficerMarch
                29, 2006








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Commercial National Financial Corporation and will be retained by Commercial
      National Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 73.4094 Dolby encoder.

See Public Notice dated July 10, 1974, 72 FCC 2d 790.

[45 FR 6403, Jan. 28, 1980]
Exhibit 10.16


	
  MOMENTA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

  	
  675 WEST KENDALL STREET

  	
  T: 617.491.9700

  	
  F: 617.621.0431

  
	
   

  	
  CAMBRIDGE, MA 02142

  	
  WWW.MOMENTAPHARMA.COM

  



 





January
29, 2007


Peter Rupprecht, Authorized Signatory


Sandoz AG


Lichtstraße 35


CH 4058 Basel BS


Switzerland


Re:  Memorandum of Understanding, by and between
Sandoz AG (“Sandoz”) and Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Momenta”),
dated July 25, 2006 (the “MOU”)


Dear
Mr. Rupprecht:


All
terms used, but not defined, herein have the meanings ascribed to them in the
MOU.


The
Parties agree that, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the MOU or the
Collaboration Agreement, no committee on which members of both Parties
participate in activities under the MOU or the Collaboration Agreement, including
the Joint Steering Committee and the joint project teams, shall remain in
existence after July 25, 2031, the twenty-fifth (25th)
anniversary of the execution of the MOU. 
In the event either party desires to continue the aforementioned
activities, and such desire is raised in the JSC after July 25, 2030 but before
July 25, 2031 the other party will discuss an extension in good faith.


Please
duly sign and return two copies of this letter to Momenta, Attention:  Chief Executive Officer, at the above mentioned
address.  Thank you.


Best
regards,


	
  Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

  
	
   

  
	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Richard P.
  Shea

  	
   

  
	
  Name: Richard P.
  Shea

  
	
  Title: VP &
  CFO

  



 


 


Agreed to and accepted by:


	
  Sandoz AG

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Peter Rupprecht

  	
   

  
	
  Name:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Title:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  
	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ [illegible]

  	
   

  
	
  Name:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Title:
#### § 80.1053 Prohibition on certification, manufacture, importation, sale or use of Class A, Class B, Class S, and INMARSAT-E EPIRBs.

The manufacture, importation, sale or use of Class A, Class B, Class S, or INMARSAT-E EPIRBs is prohibited. New Class A, Class B, Class S, or INMARSAT-E EPIRBs will no longer be certified by the Commission.

[81 FR 90748, Dec. 15, 2016]
No. 11-9605.

#### Cox *v.*Madigan, Attorney General of Illinois, et al.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority (the Authority), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge,
on the date hereof:



|(a) | this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Authority for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Authority.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/    MITCHELL GROSSINGER
ETESSMitchell Grossinger EtessChief Executive Officer, Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority December 28, 2009


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Authority and will be retained by the Authority and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 76.800 Definitions. ( a ) *MDU.* A multiple dwelling unit building (e.g., an apartment building, condominium building or cooperative).
( b ) *MDU owner.* The entity that owns or controls the common areas of a multiple dwelling unit building.
( c ) *MVPD.* A multichannel video programming distributor, as that term is defined in Section 602(13) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 522(13).
( d ) *Home run wiring.* The wiring from the demarcation point to the point at which the MVPD's wiring becomes devoted to an individual subscriber or individual loop.
[62 FR 61031, Nov. 14, 1997]