alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 68.501 Authorization procedures. ( a ) *Authorization required.* Unless exempt from the requirements of §§ 68.4 and 68.6, ACS telephonic CPE manufactured in or imported into the United States after February 28, 2020, shall be certified as hearing aid compatible by a Telecommunications Certification Body or the responsible party shall follow the procedures in this part for a Supplier's Declaration of Conformity to establish that such CPE is hearing aid compatible.
( b ) *Certification.* The requirements of §§ 68.160 and 68.162 shall apply to the certification of ACS telephonic CPE as hearing aid compatible.
( c ) *Supplier's Declaration of Conformity.* The requirements of §§ 68.320-68.350 (except § 68.324(f)) shall apply to the use of the Supplier's Declaration of Conformity procedure to establish that ACS telephonic CPE is hearing aid compatible.
( d ) *Revocation procedures.* ( 1 ) The Commission may revoke the authorization of ACS telephonic CPE under this section, where: ( i ) The equipment approval is shown to have been obtained by misrepresentation;
( ii ) The responsible party willfully or repeatedly fails to comply with the terms and conditions of its equipment approval; or
( iii ) The responsible party willfully or repeatedly fails to comply with any rule, regulation or order issued by the Commission under the Communications Act of 1934 relating to terminal equipment.
( 2 ) Before revoking such authorization, the Commission, or the Enforcement Bureau under delegated authority, will issue a written Notice of Intent to Revoke part 68 Authorization, or a Joint Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Notice of Intent to Revoke part 68 Authorization, pursuant to §§ 1.80 and 1.89 of this chapter. The notice will be sent to the responsible party for the equipment at issue at the address provided to the Administrative Council for Terminal Attachments. A product that has had its authorization revoked may not be reauthorized for a period of six months from the date of revocation of the approval. A responsible party for ACS telephonic CPE that has had its authorization revoked or that has been assessed a forfeiture, or both, may request reconsideration or make administrative appeal of the decision pursuant to part 1 of the Commission's rules: Practice and Procedure, part 1 of this chapter.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                     Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of GA
Financial, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-66107 and 333-37837) of our report
dated January 27, 1999, except as to the information presented in Note 19, for
which the date is February 26, 1999, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements of GA Financial, Inc. as of December 31, 1998 and for the years ended
December 31, 1998 and 1997, which report is incorporated by reference in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
March 27, 2000
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 10 U.S.C.  Section  1350 as adopted  pursuant to Section 1350 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  in  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of

Electronic Game Card, Inc. on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending  September 30,

2005, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof

(the "Report") for Electronic Game Card, Inc., (the "Company"),  the undersigned

hereby certifies that:



(1)      to the  best of my  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with  the

requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act

of 1934; and



(2)      to the best of my knowledge,  the  information  contained in the Report

fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and

result of operations of the Company.



February 3, 2006





/S/ LEE COLE

-------------------------------

LEE COLE

ACTING PRESIDENT AND ACTING

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
No. 11-5567.

#### Mason *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 By The Chief Executive Officer,

As Adopted
Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002.

I, Gerald L. Storch, Chief Executive Officer of Toys R Us, Inc. (the
Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended February 3, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Gerald L. Storch                                              
|Gerald L. Storch Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)                                     
|May 15, 2007
exv10w7



 







Exhibit
10.7












February 14, 2005




David Tai

President

MetroBank, N.A.




David:




The bank is pleased to provide you with the following agreement:



We do not anticipate your having to use the following separation package plan, but, we will pay you
18 months of your base pay should the bank be acquired and the new owners seek to replace you or
diminish your employment status, i.e. pay, responsibilities, etc., or should the new management
decide to remove you for reasons other than for failed performance, cause, resignation, disability,
death or moral turpitude. If the separation package is used, then all offered stock options and/or
restricted shares may be exercised during whichever of the following timeframes is longer: the
period between the day of notification of separation and the day you receive the separation pay
package, or within two weeks of receiving a separation notification.



We value your past and present contributions and look to the future for you continued efforts and
dedication to MetroBank, N.A.



Sincerely,




/s/ George Lee




George Lee

Chief Executive Officer

MetroBank, N.A.
Editorial Note on Part 74
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 74 appear at 64 FR 4055, Jan. 27, 1999.

§ 74.1284 Rebroadcasts. ( a ) The term *rebroadcast* means the reception by radio of the programs or other signals of a radio station and the simultaneous retransmission of such programs or signals for direct reception by the general public.
( b ) The licensee of an FM translator shall not rebroadcast the programs of any AM or FM broadcast station or other FM translator without obtaining prior consent of the primary station whose programs are proposed to be retransmitted. The Commission shall be notified of the call letters of each station rebroadcast and the licensee of the FM translator shall certify that written consent has been received from the licensee of the station whose programs are retransmitted.
( c ) An FM translator is not authorized to rebroadcast the transmissions of any class of station other than an AM or FM broadcast station or another FM translator.
[35 FR 15388, Oct. 2, 1970, as amended at 74 FR 45130, Sept. 1, 2009]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,983,372
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               25,362,352
<ALLOWANCES>                                    73,891
<INVENTORY>                                    439,182
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            31,852,198
<PP&E>                                      16,780,046
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,629,636
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              98,546,346
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,845,350
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       225,300
<OTHER-SE>                                  39,655,801
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                98,546,346
<SALES>                                    109,471,727
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           109,471,727
<CGS>                                       75,634,218
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               75,634,218
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               755,989
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                30,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,951,635
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             12,500,626
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,908,510
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,592,116
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,592,116
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .33
        

</TABLE>
No. 11-8588.

#### Robinson *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir.

Certiorari denied.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4623

Entitled the ‘‘Anti-Hypocrisy Deficit Reduction Act’’, to provide for antihypocritical adjustments for fiscal year 1994.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 22, 1994

Mr. OBEY (for himself, Mr. SARPALIUS, Ms. SHEPHERD, Mr. BONIOR, Mr.

WISE, and Mr. DERRICK) introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to the Committees on Government Operations and Appropriations

A BILL

Entitled the ‘‘Anti-Hypocrisy Deficit Reduction Act’’, to

provide for anti-hypocritical adjustments for fiscal year 1994.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 TITLE I—DISCRETIONARY CAP

4 ADJUSTMENTS

5 SECTION 101. DOWNWARD ADJUSTMENT OF DISCRE6 TIONARY SPENDING LIMITS.

7 The discretionary spending limits (new budget au8 thority and outlays) for fiscal year 1994 set forth in sec9 tion 601(a)(2) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974,
2

HR 4623 IH

1 as adjusted in strict conformance with section 251 of the

2 Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of

3 1985, shall be reduced, as calculated by the Director of

4 the Office of Management and Budget, in amounts equal

5 to the aggregate amounts of rescissions under title II for

6 that fiscal year.

7 SEC. 102. SPENDING LIMITS FOR FISCAL YEARS 1995–1998.

8 (a) REDUCTION IN SPENDING LIMITS.—The discre9 tionary spending limits (new budget authority and out10 lays) for each of fiscal years 1995, 1996, 1997, and 1998

11 set forth in section 601(a)(2) of the Congressional Budget

12 Act of 1974, as adjusted in strict conformance with sec13 tion 251 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit

14 Control Act of 1985, shall be reduced, as calculated by

15 the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, by

16 the aggregate amounts of rescissions under title II for fis17 cal year 1994, plus any additional savings for that fiscal

18 year as a result of the enactment of title III.

19 (b) DEFINITION.—For purposes of subsection (a),

20 the term ‘‘additional savings for that fiscal year as a result

21 of the enactment of title III’’ means the net aggregate

22 amount (if any) by which fiscal year 1994 appropriations

23 (before any rescissions made under title II) for all pro24 grams, projects, and activities for which new authorization

25 levels are established by title III exceeds those new author-
3

HR 4623 IH

1 ization levels for fiscal year 1995, 1996, 1997, or 1998,

2 as the case may be.

3 TITLE II—REDUCTIONS IN SPENDING

4 SEC. 201. RESCISSIONS.

5 TITLE III—CHANGES IN AUTHORIZATION

6 STATUTES TO EFFECT SPENDING RE7 DUCTIONS

Æ
#### § 76.125 Indemnification contracts.

No television broadcast station licensee shall enter into any contract to indemnify a satellite carrier for liability resulting from failure to delete programming in accordance with the provisions of this subpart unless the licensee has a reasonable basis for concluding that such program deletion is not required by this Subpart.
# The Chancellor's Speaker Series 2022

/ Published Oct. 25, 2022
October 19th, 2022,
No. 11-5711.

#### Buenrostro, aka Rostro *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4620

To provide that the costs relating to repairs correcting seepage problems

at Twin Buttes Dam, Texas, are nonreimbursable.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 21, 1994

Mr. STENHOLM (for himself and Mr. SMITH of Texas) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

A BILL

To provide that the costs relating to repairs correcting seepage problems at Twin Buttes Dam, Texas, are

nonreimbursable.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the costs relating to repairs correcting seepage prob4 lems at Twin Buttes Dam, Texas, shall be

5 nonreimbursable under Federal reclamation laws (Act of

6 June 17, 1902 (32 Stat. 388), and Acts supplementary

7 thereto and amendatory thereof). Such repairs shall in8 clude the design and construction of a positive cut-off

9 trench, foundation treatment, drainage, and instrumenta10 tion work.
2

•HR 4620 IH

Æ
265P15

#### State v. Walter Timothy Gause

Defs Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Decision of COA (COAI4-1085)

Denied
COURT OF APPEALS.

#### Russel F. Hicks, respondent agt. Amariah H. Bradner, appellant.

In an action for damages for *crirmnal conversation*by the defendant with the plaintiff ’9 wife, the wife cannot be a witness against her husband.

*January Term,*1868.

This action was brought to^recover damages of defendant for criminal conversation with the plaintiff’s wife, and tried at the Steuben circuit in October, 1860, when a verdict was rendered in favor of the defendant.

Exceptions were taken upon the trial to the rulings of the judge admitting evidence-objected to, and judgment having been entered upon the verdict, the plaintiff appealed to the general term of the supreme court; a new trial was ordered and the defendant appealed to the court of appeals.

Miller, J.

It is evident that the judge erred upon the trial in allowing the wife of the plaintiff to. be sworn as a witness and to testify against her husband. At common law the husband and wife could not be witnesses for or against each other,, and this-rule of the common law is not changed by the provisions of the Code which abrogate the disqualification of witnesses by reason of their being parties. These provisions, as they existed when this action was tried, have no application to a ease like the one at bar, as has been held in numerous adjudications of the court. *(Hasbrouck*agt. *Vandervoort,*5 *Seld.*153; *Smith*agt. *Smith,*15 *How.*165 ; *Marsh*agt. *Potter,*30 *Barb.*506; *Macondray*agt. *Wadle,*26 *Barb.*612; *White*agt. *Stafford,*38 *Barb.*419; *Carpenter*agt. *White,*46 *Barb.*291; *Rivenburgh*agt. Rivenburgh, 47 *Barb,*419.) As this error of the judge was sufficient to authorize the general term to grant a new trial, it is not *119necessary to examine the other questions raised, and the judgment of the general term must be affirmed.

All concur..

Judgment affirmed.
No. 11-9311.

#### Wolf *v.*McDaniel, Warden, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Community Bank Corporation of America (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Stan B. McClelland, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |     |  |                                            
|------------------ |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------
|Date: May 13, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/ Stan B. McClelland                     
|                   |  |     |  | Stan B. McClelland, Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Netfabric Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeff
Robinson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

     (1)   The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

May 13, 2005

                                     /s/ Jeff Robinson
                                     --------------------------------
                                     Name: Jeff Robinson
                                     Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Netfabric, Inc. and will be retained by Netfabric Holdings,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
§ 64.2305 Definitions. Terms used in this subpart have the following meanings: ( a ) *Base file subscriber list information.* A directory publisher requests base file subscriber list information when the publisher requests, as of a given date, all of a carrier's subscriber list information that the publisher wishes to include in one or more directories.
( b ) *Business subscriber.* Business subscriber refers to a subscriber to telephone exchange service for businesses.
( c ) *Primary advertising classification.* A primary advertising classification is the principal business heading under which a subscriber to telephone exchange service for businesses chooses to be listed in the yellow pages, if the carrier either assigns that heading or is obligated to provide yellow pages listings as part of telephone exchange service to businesses. In other circumstances, a primary advertising classification is the classification of a subscriber to telephone exchange service as a business subscriber.
( d ) *Residential subscriber.* Residential subscriber refers to a subscriber to telephone exchange service that is not a business subscriber.
( e ) *Subscriber list information.* Subscriber list information is any information: ( 1 ) Identifying the listed names of subscribers of a carrier and such subscribers' telephone numbers, addresses, or primary advertising classifications (as such classifications are assigned at the time of the establishment of such service), or any combination of such listed names, numbers, addresses, or classifications; and
( 2 ) That the carrier or an affiliate has published, caused to be published, or accepted for publication in any directory format.
( f ) *Telecommunications carrier.* A telecommunications carrier is any provider of telecommunications services, except that such term does not include aggregators of telecommunications services (as defined in 47 U.S.C. 226(a)(2)).
( g ) *Telephone exchange service.* Telephone exchange service means: ( 1 ) Service within a telephone exchange, or within a connected system of telephone exchanges within the same exchange area operated to furnish to subscribers intercommunicating service of the character ordinarily furnished by a single exchange, and which is covered by the exchange service charge, or ( B ) Comparable service provided through a system of switches, transmission equipment, or other facilities (or combination thereof) by which a subscriber can originate and terminate a telecommunications service.
( h ) *Updated subscriber list information.* A directory publisher requests updated subscriber list information when the publisher requests changes to all or any part of a carrier's subscriber list information occurring between specified dates.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)  OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Carl A. Pelzel, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report of Depomed, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



March 12,
2008

| |  | By: |  | /s/CARL A. PELZELCarl A. Pelzel Chief Executive Officer
| |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks