alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit (32.1)
Certification pursuant Section 906

            CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                   AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of DataLogic
International, Inc (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September
30, 2006 (the "Report"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his
capacity as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
   of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
   respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: December 21, 2006             /s/ Keith Moore
                                    ------------------------------------
                                    Title: Chief Executive Officer,
                                    Chief Operating Officer and Director
                                    (Principal Executive Officer)



Date: December 21, 2006              /s/ Keith Moore
                                    ------------------------------------
                                    Title: Chief Financial Officer
                                    (Principal Financial Officer)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vectoria, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Serge Doyon, CEO and acting CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By: /s/ Serge DoyonName:	Serge DoyonTitle:	CEO and acting CFODate: 	August 19, 2002
Martin, Michael (OST) 

From: Martin, Michael (OST) 

Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 3:25 PM 

To: Jim Lynaugh Ulynaugh@kearneygov.org); Stanley Clouse (mayor@kearneygov.org); 

Mike Morgan (MMorgan@kearneygov.org); Mike Sharkey (msharkey@hamilton.net); 

'Darwin Skelton (dskelton@flyscottsbluff.com)'; Randy Meininger 

(rmeininger@scottsbluff.org) 

Cc: michael.mooney@sixelconsulting.com; Schlemmer, Kevin (OST) 

Subject: ADI and EAS at Kearney, North Platte, and Scottsbluff 

Attachments: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - ADI - January 22, 2015.pdf 

Everyone: . ! 

'I 

I am writing today to make you aware of the attached Order issued by the Department tentatively finding that , 

Aerodynamics Incorporated's (ADI) application for interstate scheduled passenger authority should:be denied arid its 

interstate and foreign charter passenger certificates should be revoked. , · · 

It is the Department's tentative conclusion that ADI has failed to demonstrate it continues to be fit to operate as an air 

carrier under the direction and control of its current Chief Executive Officer. Objections to this tentative decision are 

due in 14 days following the service date of this Order and the entire documentation of the application can be found in 

the Docket DOT-OST-2014-0114 at www.regulations.gov. 

This obviously impacts the EAS air carrier selection case for the communities of Kearney, North Platte, and Scottsbluff, 

since all three supported ADI's proposal to provide EAS. In light ofthis development, here are the options you have 

regarding the EAS air carrier selection at your community: 

• As stated above, you may submit comments to the Department with respect to its tentative finding and wait 

until the Department issues a final decision; 

• You may re-evaluate the other air carrier proposals that were submitted (Great Lakes or Boutique Air; Via Air is 

not an option since they do not have the requisite authority from the Department to provide the scheduled 

service as proposed in their bid); 

• You may request that the Department issue another Order requesting a third round of proposals 

It would be ideal if all three communities were in agreement as to the next course of action; therefore, if all three 

communities could provide me their decision as to how they want to proceed forward by next Friday, January 30, I 

would appreciate it. Whatever decision you make, the Department will continue to hold Great Lakes in until further 

notice. 

I am available to answer any questions so feel free to contact me. 

Regards, 

Michael Martin 

United States Department of Transportation 

Essential Air Service (EAS) and Small Community Air Service Development Program (SCASDP) 

(202) 366-6494 

1
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Team Health Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q (“Form 10-Q”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Greg Roth,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date:November 9, 2010
§ 73.3591 Grants without hearing. ( a ) Except for renewal applications filed after May 1, 1995 which will be subject to paragraph (d) of this section, in the case of any application for an instrument of authorization, other than a license pursuant to a construction permit, the FCC will make the grant if it finds (on the basis of the application, the pleadings filed or other matters which it may officially notice) that the application presents no substantial and material question of fact and meets the following requirements: ( 1 ) There is not pending a mutually exclusive application filed in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section;
( 2 ) The applicant is legally, technically, financially, and otherwise qualified;
( 3 ) The applicant is not in violation of provisions of law, the FCC rules, or established policies of the FCC; and
( 4 ) A grant of the application would otherwise serve the public interest, convenience and necessity.
( b ) In making its determinations pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section, the FCC will not consider any other application, or any application if amended so as to require a new file number, as being mutually exclusive or in conflict with the application under consideration unless such other application was substantially complete, and tendered for filing by: ( 1 ) The close of business on the day preceding the day designated by Public Notice as the day the listed application is to be available and ready for processing;
( 2 ) The date prescribed in § 73.3516(e) in the case of applications which are mutually exclusive with applications for renewal of license of broadcast stations; or
( 3 ) The close of business on the day designated by the FCC pursuant to § 73.3564(d) as the date(s) for filing low power TV or TV translator applications.
( c ) If a petition to deny the application has been filed in accordance with § 73.3584 and the FCC makes the grant in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section, the FCC will deny the petition and issue a concise statement setting forth the reasons for denial and disposing of all substantial issues raised by the petition.
( d ) Renewal applications filed after May 1, 1995 will be governed by the criteria established in 47 U.S.C. § 309(k).
[44 FR 38507, July 2, 1979, as amended at 50 FR 47844, Dec. 7, 1984; 59 FR 31557, June 20, 1994; 61 FR 18291, Apr. 25, 1996]
**B F**  IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0094 AARON JOEL OLIPHANT ,

Petitioner and Appellant , v. STATE OF MONTANA ,

Respondent and Appellee . **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee ’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including Septe mber 2 6 , 2022 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief

.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 18 2022

08/18/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0094
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michelle A. Smith, Director, Office of Board Members; 202-452-2955. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at                     *http://www.federalreserve.gov*                     for an electronic announcement that not only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other information about the meeting.                 

Dated: January 20, 2006. 

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Deputy Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 06-715 Filed 1-20-06; 3:13 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### Charles A. KOONS et al. v. Henry J. KAISER et al.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Oct. 6, 1950.

Writ of Certiorari Denied March 5, 1951.

See 71 S.Ct. 505.

See also 91 F.Supp. 511.

PER CURIAM.

Petition for mandamus denied on authority of Magnetic Engineering & Manufacturing Company v. Dings Manufacturing Co., 2 Cir., 178 F.2d 866.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 968/2005

of 23 June 2005         

fixing the export refunds on cereals and on wheat or rye flour, groats and meal

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The export refunds on the products listed in Article 1(a), (b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003, excluding malt, exported in the natural state, shall be as set out in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 24 June 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 June 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

(2)OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1431/2003 (OJ L 203, 12.8.2003, p. 16).

----

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 23 June 2005 fixing the export refunds on cereals and on wheat or rye flour, groats and meal

----
§ 69.130 Line port costs in excess of basic analog service. ( a ) To the extent that the costs of ISDN line ports, and line ports associated with other services, exceed the costs of a line port used for basic, analog service, non-price cap local exchange carriers may recover the difference through a separate monthly end-user charge, provided that no portion of such excess cost may be recovered through other common line access charges, or through Connect America Fund Broadband Loop Support.
( b ) The maximum charge a non-price cap local exchange carrier that elects model-based support pursuant to § 54.311 of this chapter or Alaska Plan support pursuant to § 54.306 of this chapter may assess is the rate in effect on the last day of the month preceding the month for which model-based support or Alaska Plan support, as applicable, is first provided.
[81 FR 24345, Apr. 25, 2016, amended at 81 FR 69716, Oct. 7, 2016]
116P16

#### Linda M. Bennett, Executrix for Elizabeth H. Maynard, Deceased, Lisa M. Bennett, Personally on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Hospice & Palliative Care Center of Alamance-Caswell, Community Home Care and Hospice, LLC, The Oaks of Alamance, LLC, Jeffrey Brown, M.D., Beth Hodges, M.D., Does 1-10, Inclusive

1. Pit’s *Pro Se*Notice of Appeal Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA15-667)

1. Dismissed *ex mero motu*

2. Pit’s *Pro Se*PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

2. Denied

3. Def’s Conditional PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

3. Dismissed as moot
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         August 24, 2006.                    

*Time:*                         10 a.m. to 11 a.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Judith A. Arroyo, PhD., Scientific Review Administrator, National Institute of Alcohol, Abuse and Alcoholism, 5635 Fishers Lane, Room 3041, Bethesda, MD 20892-9804, 301-443-0800,                         *jarroyo@mail.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 93.373, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 21, 2006. 

Anna Snouffer, 

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 06-7176 Filed 8-25-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
§ 65.103 Procedures for filing rate of return submissions. ( a ) Rate of return submissions listed in § 65.103 (b)(1) and (c) may include any relevant information, subject to the page limitations of § 65.104. The Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau, may require from carriers providing interstate services, and from other participants submitting rate of return submissions, data, studies or other information that are reasonably calculated to lead to a full and fair record.
( b ) In proceedings to prescribe an authorized unitary rate of return on interstate access services, interested parties may file direct case submissions, responses, and rebuttals. Direct case submissions shall be filed within sixty (60) calendar days following the effective date of a Commission notice initiating a rate of return proceeding pursuant to § 65.101(b). Rate of return submissions responsive to the direct case submissions shall be filed within sixty (60) calendar days after the deadline for filing direct case submissions. Rebuttal submissions shall be field within twenty-one (21) calendar days after the deadline for filing responsive submissions.
( c ) Petitions for exclusion from unitary treatment and for individual treatment may be filed on the same date as the deadline for filing responsive rate of return submissions. Oppositions shall be filed within 35 calendar days thereafter. Rebuttal submissions shall be filed within 21 calendar days after the deadline for filing responsive submissions.
( d ) An original and 4 copies of all rate of return submissions shall be filed with the Secretary.
( e ) The filing party shall serve a copy of each rate of return submission, other than an initial submission, on all participants who have filed a designation of service notice pursuant to § 65.100(b).
[60 FR 28544, June 1, 1995, as amended at 67 FR 13229, Mar. 21, 2002]
###### Editorial Note on Part 74

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 74 appear at 64 FR 4055, Jan. 27, 1999.

#### § 74.662 Frequency monitors and measurements.

The licensee of a television broadcast auxiliary station must provide means for measuring the operating frequency in order to ensure that the emissions are confined to the authorized channel.

[48 FR 38482, Aug. 24, 1983]
No. 11-5518.

#### Block *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
# Flight Operations S afety Checklist

SAFETY OFFICER CHECKLIST

 SAFE TY CLOTHING (VEST) AND HARD HAT

 CORDEN OFF AREA WITH SIGNAGE

 S ET UP SIGNS AND DISPLAY TRIPODS

 CHECK FOR PER SONNEL AND OBSTRUCTIONS IN AREA

 ALERT PER SONNEL THEY MUST LEAVE THE AREA

 LOCATE AND FLAG OBSTRUCTIONS

 CHECK FI RE EXTINGUISHER AND MEDICAL KIT

 SET U P WORKING TABLE AND LANDING PAD

 CHECK COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS

 SET UP BATTERY CHARGERS

 COPTER BATTERY CHARGER

 VIDEO RECIEVER BATTERY CHARGER

 RC TRANSMITTER BATTERY CHARGER

 CAMERA BATTERY CHARGER

 WALKIE

- TALKIE BATTERY CHARGER

 CHECK BATTERIES FOR FULL CHARGE

 START

- UP AND LIFT OFF CHECKLIST

 CHECK INSPECTION AREA FOR PERSONNEL OR WILDLIFE

 SAFETY OFFICER/ VLOS SPOTTER READY CALL CONFIRMATION

## PILOT/OPERATOR SAFETY CHECKLIST

 SAFETY CLOTHING (VEST) AND HARD HAT

 COPTER CHECKLIST

 CHECK FOR ANY DAMAGE OR LOOSE WIRES

 CHECK PROPS FOR DAMAGE AND REPAIR/REPLACE AS NEEDED

 RAISE ALL ATTENNAS

 CHECK CAMERA GIMBAL MOVEMENT

 POWER UP CAMERA & CHECK SETTINGS

 ATTACH LIPO BATTERY

 CHECK BALANCE WITH BATTERY ATTACHED

 ATTACH COPTER BATTERY LEADS

 RADIO AND VIDEO CHECKLIST

 POWER UP GROUND CONTROL STATION

 POWER UP RADIO AND FVP MONITOR

 CHECK VISUAL ON BOTH CAMERAS

 CHECK PROGRAMMING SCREEN DETAILS

 START

- UP AND LIFT OFF CHECKLIST

 CHECK INSPECTION AREA FOR PERSONNEL OR WILDLIFE

 SAFETY OFFICER/SPOTTER READY CALL

 START

- UP PROPS LIFT

- OFF AND H OVER

 CHECK CONTROLS

 GPS MODE CHECK

 ALTITUDE UP/DOWN CHECK

 TURN RIGHT/LEFT CHECK

 SLIDE LEFT/RIGHT CHECK

 FORWARD/REVERSE CHECK

 CAMERA OPER ATION CHECK

 LIGHTS ON/OFF CHECK

 BEGIN INSPECTION/MAPPING/MONITORING
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4595

AN ACT

To designate the building located at 4021 Laclede in St.

Louis, Missouri, for the period of time during which

it houses operations of the United States Postal Service,

as the ‘‘Marian Oldham Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The building located at 4021 Laclede in St. Louis,

5 Missouri, shall, for the period of time during which it

6 houses operations of the United States Postal Service, be

7 known and designated as the ‘‘Marian Oldham Post Of8 fice’’.
2

•HR 4595 EH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the building

4 referred to in section 1 shall, with respect to the period

5 referred to in section 1, be deemed to be a reference to

6 the Marian Oldham Post Office.

Passed the House of Representatives June 27, 1994.

Attest:

Clerk.
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4595

AN ACT

To designate the building located at 4021 Laclede

Post Office’’.States Postal Service, as the ‘‘Marian Oldhaming which it houses operations of the Unitedin St. Louis, Missouri, for the period of time dur-
§ 73.3538 Application to make changes in an existing station. Where prior authority is required from the FCC to make changes in an existing station, the following procedures shall be used to request that authority: ( a ) An application for construction permit using the forms listed in § 73.3533 must be filed for authority to: ( 1 ) Make any of the changes listed in § 73.1690(b).
( 2 ) Change the hours of operation of an AM station, where the hours of operation are specified on the license or permit.
( 3 ) Install a transmitter which has not been approved (type accepted) by the FCC for use by licensed broadcast stations.
( 4 ) Any change in the location, height, or directional radiating characteristics of the antenna or antenna system.
( b ) An informal application filed in accordance with § 73.3511 is to be used to obtain authority to modify or discontinue the obstruction marking or lighting of the antenna supporting structure where that specified on the station authorization either differs from that specified in 47 CFR part 17, or is not appropriate for other reasons.
[44 FR 38495, July 2, 1979, as amended at 44 FR 69935, Dec. 5, 1979; 49 FR 4000, Feb. 1, 1984; 52 FR 21685, June 9, 1987; 62 FR 51063, Sept. 30, 1997; 66 FR 20758, Apr. 25, 2001; 82 FR 57884, Dec. 8, 2017]