alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

I Akty, jejichž zveřejnění je povinné

----

NAŘÍZENÍ KOMISE (ES) č. 1048/2005

ze dne 13. června 2005,

kterým se mění nařízení (ES) č. 2032/2003 o druhé etapě desetiletého pracovního programu uvedeného v čl. 16 odst. 2 směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady 98/8/ES o uvádění biocidních přípravků na trh

(Text s významem pro EHP)

KOMISE EVROPSKÝCH SPOLEČENSTVÍ,

s ohledem na Smlouvu o založení Evropského společenství,

s ohledem na směrnici Evropského parlamentu a Rady 98/8/ES ze dne 16. února 1998 o uvádění biocidních přípravků na trh (1), a zejména na čl.16 odst. 2 uvedené směrnice,

vzhledem k těmto důvodům:

PŘIJALA TOTO NAŘÍZENÍ:

Článek 1

Nařízení (ES) č. 2032/2003 se mění takto:

Článek 2

Vstup v platnost

Toto nařízení vstupuje v platnost dvacátým dnem po vyhlášení v Úředním věstníku Evropské unie.

Toto nařízení je závazné v celém rozsahu a přímo použitelné ve všech členských státech.

V Bruselu dne 13. června 2005.

Za Komisi

Stavros DIMAS

člen Komise

----

(1)Úř. věst. L 123, 24.4.1998, s. 1. Směrnice ve znění nařízení (ES) č. 1882/2003 (Úř. věst. L 284, 31.10.2003, s. 1).

(2)Úř. věst. L 307, 24.11.2003, s. 1.

(3)Úř. věst. L 228, 8.9.2000, s. 6. Nařízení ve znění nařízení (ES) č. 2032/2003.

(4)Úř. věst. L 258, 26.9.2002, s. 15.

----

PŘÍLOHA I

Příloha I nařízení (ES) č. 2032/2003 se mění takto:

----

PŘÍLOHA II

„PŘÍLOHA II

EXISTUJÍCÍ ÚČINNÉ LÁTKY A TYPY PŘÍPRAVKŮ ZAŘAZENÝCH DO PROGRAMU PŘEZKOUMÁNÍ (1)

----

(1)  Kontaktní údaje o účastnících jsou uvedeny na adrese http://ecb.jrc.it/biocides.

----

PŘÍLOHA III

Příloha III nařízení (ES) č. 2032/2003 se mění takto:

----

PŘÍLOHA IV

Příloha V nařízení (ES) č. 2032/2003 se mění takto:

----

PŘÍLOHA V

„PŘÍLOHA VI

PŘÍSLUŠNÉ ORGÁNY UVEDENÉ V ČL. 5 ODST. 4, STAV K 1. BŘEZNU 2005

BELGIE

ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA

DÁNSKO

NĚMECKO

ESTONSKO

ŘECKO

ŠPANĚLSKO

FRANCIE

IRSKO

ITÁLIE

KYPR

LOTYŠSKO

LITVA

LUCEMBURSKO

MAĎARSKO

MALTA

NIZOZEMSKO

RAKOUSKO

POLSKO

PORTUGALSKO

SLOVINSKO

SLOVENSKO

FINSKO

ŠVÉDSKO

SPOJENÉ KRÁLOVSTVÍ

ISLAND

NORSKO

----

PŘÍLOHA VI

„PŘÍLOHA VII

EXISTUJÍCÍ ÚČINNÉ LÁTKY, KTERÉ NEBYLY IDENTIFIKOVÁNY DO 28. BŘEZNA 2002, ALE SMĚJÍ ZŮSTAT NA TRHU DO 1. ZÁŘÍ 2006

----

PŘÍLOHA VII

„PŘÍLOHA VIII

EXISTUJÍCÍ ÚČINNÉ LÁTKY, KTERÉ BYLY OZNÁMENY, AVŠAK PRO KTERÉ NEBYLA PŘEDLOŽENA ŽÁDNÁ DOKUMENTACE NEBO NEBYLA UZNÁNA JAKO ÚPLNÁ A PRO KTERÉ NEPROJEVIL ŽÁDNÝ PRODUCENT, VÝROBCE PŘÍPRAVKU, SDRUŽENÍ, JINÁ OSOBA NEBO ČLENSKÝ STÁT ZÁJEM PŘEVZÍT ROLI ÚČASTNÍKA

----
24 September 2015

257A15

#### Joseph Michael Griffith v. Chaplain Hovis, et al.

1. Pit’s *Pro Se*Notice of Appeal Based üpon a Constitutional Question (COA14-1411)

1.-

2. Pit’s *Pro Se*Motion to Proceed *In Forma Pauperis*

2. Allowed

3. Defs’ Motion to Dismiss the Appeal

3. Allowed

Jackson, J.,

recused
#### § 76.1501 Qualifications to be an open video system operator.

Any person may obtain a certification to operate an open video system pursuant to Section 653(a)(1) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 573(a)(1), except that an operator of a cable system may not obtain such certification within its cable service area unless it is subject to “effective competition” as defined in Section 623(l)(1) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 543(l)(1). The effective competition requirement of the preceding sentence does not apply to a local exchange carrier that is also a cable operator that seeks open video system certification within its cable service area. A cable operator that is not subject to effective competition within its cable service area may file a petition with the Commission, seeking a finding that particular circumstances exist that make it consistent with the public interest, convenience, and necessity to allow the operator to convert its cable system to an open video system. Nothing herein shall be construed to affect the terms of any franchising agreement or other contractual agreement.

[65 FR 376, Jan. 5, 2000]
#### § 6.16 Informal or formal complaints.

Any person may file either a formal or informal complaint against a manufacturer or provider alleging violations of section 255 of the Act or this part subject to the enforcement requirements set forth in §§ 14.30 through 14.38 of this chapter.

[83 FR 44842, Sept. 4, 2018]
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER  SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I,
Victor J. Salerno, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of American Wagering, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and the internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date: May 7, 2010

/s/ VICTOR J. SALERNO Victor J. Salerno,President and
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)


---



QuickLinks
### Docket Number: FA **A -**  **2014 -**  **0055 Contacts.**  With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 8/19/13 --- Regional Airline Association 8/19/13 --- Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 8/19/13 --- AT A M. Lopez 8/19/13 ---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               64,389,696
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,485,000
<INVENTORY>                                 38,076,326
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           114,419,326
<PP&E>                                     709,776,182
<DEPRECIATION>                             255,892,910
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             691,480,690
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       55,817,455
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,253,332
<OTHER-SE>                                 142,948,536
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               691,480,690
<SALES>                                    187,557,742
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           250,120,335
<CGS>                                      117,175,764
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              209,473,655
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               688,278
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          24,495,742
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             16,377,137
<INCOME-TAX>                                 5,077,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         11,300,137
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                11,300,137
<EPS-BASIC>                                      $2.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $2.26


</TABLE>
#### § 69.119 Basic service element expedited approval process.

The rules for filing comments and reply comments on requests for expedited approval of new basic service elements are those indicated in § 1.45 of the rules, except as specified otherwise.

[56 FR 33881, July 24, 1991]
No. 11-9819.

#### McCammon *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 54.724 Time periods for Commission approval of Administrator decisions. ( a ) The Wireline Competition Bureau shall, within ninety (90) days, take action in response to a request for review of an Administrator decision that is properly before it. The Wireline Competition Bureau may extend the time period for taking action on a request for review of an Administrator decision for a period of up to ninety days. The Commission may also at any time, extend the time period for taking action of a request for review of an Administrator decision pending before the Wireline Competition Bureau.
( b ) The Commission shall issue a written decision in response to a request for review of an Administrator decision that involves novel questions of fact, law, or policy within ninety (90) days. The Commission may extend the time period for taking action on the request for review of an Administrator decision. The Wireline Competition Bureau also may extend action on a request for review of an Administrator decision for a period of up to ninety days.
[67 FR 13228, Mar. 21, 2002]
§ 73.220 Restrictions on use of channels. ( a ) The frequency 89.1 MHz (channel 206) is revised in the New York City metropolitan area for the use of the United Nations with the equivalent of an antenna height of 150 meters (492 feet) above average terrain and effective radiated power of 20 kWs, and the FCC will make no assignments which would cause objectionable interference with such use.
( b ) [Reserved]
[43 FR 45845, Oct. 4, 1978, as amended at 46 FR 50376, Oct. 13, 1981, 47 FR 30068, July 12, 1982; 48 FR 29507, June 27, 1983; 70 FR 46676, Aug. 10, 2005]
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"19-2087: ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION v. SHOPPERSCHOICE.COM, LLC [OPINION], Precedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"LieOmxmnwX\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/7-01-2020-19-2087-electronic-communication-v-shopperschoicecom-llc-opinion-19-2087-opinion-7-1-2020_1612569\/\">19-2087: ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION v. SHOPPERSCHOICE.COM, LLC [OPINION], Precedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/7-01-2020-19-2087-electronic-communication-v-shopperschoicecom-llc-opinion-19-2087-opinion-7-1-2020_1612569\/embed\/#?secret=LieOmxmnwX\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“19-2087: ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION v. SHOPPERSCHOICE.COM, LLC [OPINION], Precedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"LieOmxmnwX\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Opinions\/Orders posted: ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION v. SHOPPERSCHOICE.COM, LLC [OPINION](pdf) Appeal Number: 19-2087 Origin: DCT Precedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
No. 11M109.

No. 11M111.

#### Mr. S. *v.*United States; and Under Seal *v.*United States.

Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record granted.
#### Miami Transit Company, a Florida Corporation, *Plaintiff in Error,*vs. R. E. Ross, *Defendant in Error.*

143 So. 234.

En Banc.

Opinion filed July 27, 1932.

Petition for rehearing denied August 23, 1932.

*Worley <& Worley,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*ColUns <& Collins,*and *Waller <& Pepper,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This writ of error was taken to a judgment for $4423.68 damages to the plaintiff in an action for personal and property injuries in a collision between an automobile and a motor bus. The record has been duly considered and negligence of the defendant as alleged being shown but the damages' awarded being excessive a remittitur may be permitted. Ryan v. Noble, 95 Fla. 830, 115 So. 766; Luce v. Lee, 79 Fla. 693, 84 So. *299726; Florida Railway and Navigation Co. v. Webster, 25 Fla. 394, 5 So. 714. Tbe court, without a detailed discussion of the errors assigned, hereby orders1 that upon remittitur of $1500.00 being entered as of the date of the judgment, within ten days after the filing of the mandate in the trial court, the judgment will stand affirmed for the remainder $2923.68, otherwise the judgment will stand reversed for a new trial.

It is so ordered.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Davis, J. J., concur.
STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY SOURCE TEST CALIBRATION METHOD IV BARTON ANALYZER CALIBRATION I. Principle The Barton Titrater is calibrated by m eans of standard atmospheres of H 2 S supplied by gravimetrically ca librated permeation tubes over a range of zero to 60 ppm. II. Equipment (1) Barton Titrater, with cellls and chart recorder. (2) H 2 S permeation tubes, gravimetrically calibrated for emission rates at 25 degrees C. (3) Calibrated flowmeters, calibrated we t test meter, Teflon tubing, Teflon and glass control valves, glass manifo ld with gas mixing tubes, constant temperature bath pump. III. Procedure Set up and adjust the Barton with the nece ssary connections for sampling from the permeation tubes immersed in the consta nt temperature bath. Install calibrated flowmeters and pump to supply the requi red air flow to the Barton via the manifold. Allow adequate time for equilibration of the permeation tubes at the set temperature. Sample four (4) upscale con centrations of gas starting with a blank determination on zero air, and including a zero blank between each concentration. Repeat any unstable traces and allow at least 15 minutes of recording at each concentration point. The nece ssary recorded values s hould be at 20%, 40%, 60% and 80% of full scale. IV. Calculations Calculate the four standard atmo spheres as concentrations of H 2 S in ppm, according to the following formula: . H 2 S (ppm plus or minus 5%) equals .719 x P x L Flow P is Permeation rate in ng/min./cm tube length. L is the length of permeation tu bes used for concentration point. Flow is the total sample flow over the tubes into the manifold. Plot both calculated and recorded con centration points vs. 0 –100 chart div. as a calibration curve.STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY BARTON TITRATER CALIBRATION Date _________________________ Permeation Tubes Used: Permeation Rate @ 25 degrees C ________________________ ______________________ ng/min

________________________ ______________________

________________________ ______________________

________________________ ______________________

Calculated H 2 S Concentration (ppm) Barton Recorder Reading 1. ______________________ ______________________ 2. ______________________ ______________________ 3. ______________________ ______________________ 4. ______________________ ______________________

Plot both calculated values and Barton reco rder values vs. 0 – 100 chart division. The plot should be linear, an respective point va lues should agree within plus or minus 5%.
## MID-MICHIGAN

# ~~-/!-·....__ ..._.. BUSINESS TRAVEL 

# COALITION

The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx Secretary ofTransportation US Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Ave SE Washington , DC 20590 The Honorable John F

. Kerry Secretary of State 

### US Department of 

### Stat e 2201 C Street NW Washington , DC 20520
Dear Secretaries Kerry and FoxxThe over 200 members of the Mid-M ichigan Bus i ness Travel Coalition is a unified voice for the business community throughout the capital region that includes some of the state's largest companies as well as many small businesses. We are interested in seeing the strongest possible air service in Lansing and across the state. That is why rece nt reports about government-owned Gulf carriers , Qatar Airways, Etihad Airways and Emirates Airline , violating the Open Skies policy by receiving over $40 billion in government subsidies is disturbing

. That is a clear violation ofthe spirit of Open Skies policy and i s detrimental to Michigan businesses that use the Cap ital Region International Airport

. This airport is a $1 billion regional asset and an economic engine for our region for the jobs it has created , the people it has employed, and passen gers who use the airport as a critical hub for their travel. Open Skies promotes st rong air service which creates jobs and has been essential in helpin g us attract, retain and grow businesses in the area
. Further, it has been an important factor for expanding airline access at Capital Region International Airport for business and personal travel. It is imperative that the U.S. open consultations with Qatar and the United Arab Emirates regarding the subsidies and other benefits these state-owned airlines are receiving

. As you well know, the strength of America ' s economy and the U.S. airlines industry depends on a fair and competitive playing f i eld

. More so, businesses in the mid-Michigan region cannot survive another econom ic downturn

. Simply, the current situation puts us at an economic disadvantage and the Mid-Michigan Bus i ness Travel Coalition urges you to put Open Skies on the front burner for the sake of saving Michigan jobs

. Sincerely,

Jim Robinson Board Chair of the Mid-Michigan Business Travel Coalition 

## 510-150424-015
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0464

_________________

JOSEPH RICHARD GOSS,

 Plaintiff and Appellant,

 v.

USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,

and DOES A-D, Inclusive,

 Defendant and Appellee.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Gregory R. Todd, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 21 2021

04/21/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0464
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with this Quarterly Report of HIV-VAC Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the year period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin Murray,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the
         period ending December 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material
         respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HIV-VAC
         Inc.

Dated: September 30, 2011

/s/ Kevin Murray
Kevin Murray
Chief Financial Officer
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            College of Information and Cyberspace
                    National Defense University
                CIC
        Search
                    Search CIC:
                        Search
                Search CIC:
                    Search
    Home

    About 
        Mission & Vision

    Faculty & Staff

    Fact Sheet

    Alumni

    Internships

    FAQ

    Admissions 
        Eligibility Requirements

    Admissions Calendar

    Application Instructions

    Apply Online

    International Students

    Academics 
        Graduate Catalog

    M.S. in Strategic Information and Cyberspace Studies
        
        JPME Master's Degree

    Cyber Workforce Master's Degree (Part Time)

    Leadership Development Programs

    Graduate Certificates

    Academic Partners

    Current Students 
        JPME II  Incoming Students

    LDP Incoming Students

    Student Registration

    Bring Your Own Device

    IA Compliance

    Completion Procedures / Order Transcripts

    Student Services and Resources

    Events
    
        Cyber Beacon

    Cyber PME Colloquium

    Hopper Award

    Lecture Series

    CYBERCOM Symposium

    NEWS

    UC2
    
        About

    Events

    Work With Us

    Center for Cybersecurity
    
        About

    Cybersecurity Center POC

    Cybersecurity Supporting Faculty

    CAE-CDE CISO Certificate Program

    Cybersecurity Trending News

    Cyber Labs
        
        Ethical Hacking

    Critical Infrastructure - SCADA

    Cyber Exercises
        
        Tabletop Exercise

    Cyber Competitions

    Cyber Resources and Awareness

    Stakeholder / Industry Advisory Council

    Contact 
        Contact Us

    Directions

    Access to Ft. McNair

    Map of Ft. McNair  Home
  NEWS
  News & Announcements
 News & Announcements Download
 Details
 Share
 News
 CIC Hosts the Cyberspace Solarium Commission
 CIC hosts capstone gathering of the US Cyberspace Solarium Commission. Check out the CIC site for all Commission support here.
 SHARE
 PRINT
 National Defense University


College of Information and Cyberspace

300 Fifth Ave., Bldg. 62
Fort Lesley J. McNair
Washington, DC 20319-5066

202-685-6300
                    Stay Connected
                
                
                DOD Privacy & Security
 DOD Links Disclaimer
 DOD Social Media Policy
 DOD Web Policy
 FOIA
 NDU System of Records Notice
 NDU Privacy & Security Notice
 No FEAR Act
 Open GOV
 Plain Writing Act
 Section 508
 Small Business Act
 USA.gov
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil