alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-06-00247- CR Ant oin ne Bank s, App e lla nt

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 331ST JUDICI AL DISTRICT

NO. 30411 90, H ONO RAB LE BO B PERK INS, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E MO R

A N D UM O P I N I O N An t o i nn e B a n k s s ee k s t o ap p ea l fr o ma j u d gm en to f c o nv i ct i o nfo r d el i v er i n g a controlled substance in a drug -fr ee zone. The notice of appea l w as not timely filed. See Slaton v. Sta te , 9 81 S.W. 2d

20 8 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 98 ); Ol iv o v . S tate , 9 18 S.W. 2d

51 9, 52 2- 23 (T e x. Cr im. App. 1996). The trial c ourt has ce rtified that B anks wa ived his rig ht of appe al. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). The a

ppeal is dismissed.

__________________________________________ David Puryear , J ustice Be fore J ustices B . A. Smith, P uryear and Waldrop Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: May

11, 2006 Do No t Pu

bli sh
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       7,036,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         560,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             2,500,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 14,329,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      43,905,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        43,256,000
<LOANS>                                    141,492,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,177,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             214,334,000
<DEPOSITS>                                 195,172,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                 3,000,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,063,000
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,269,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,830,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             214,334,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              8,410,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,716,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            11,126,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           4,142,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,242,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        6,884,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  606,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              47,000
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,531,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,794,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   2,794,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,707,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.66
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.93
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,316,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                 1,577,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                             1,656,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              1,572,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,873,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  309,000
<RECOVERIES>                                     7,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,177,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         2,177,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        158,500


</TABLE>
No. 11-10076.

#### Davis *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-5219.

#### Horne *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4666

To amend title 46, United States Code, to prohibit overhaul, repair, and

maintenance of Coast Guard vessels in foreign shipyards.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 28, 1994

Mr. ANDREWS of Maine introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To amend title 46, United States Code, to prohibit overhaul,

repair, and maintenance of Coast Guard vessels in foreign shipyards.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Shipbuilding

5 Jobs Preservation Act’’.
2

•HR 4666 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON OVERHAUL, REPAIR, AND MAIN2 TENANCE OF COAST GUARD VESSELS IN FOR3 EIGN SHIPYARDS.

4 (a) PROHIBITION.—Chapter 5 of title 14, United

5 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow6 ing:

7 ‘‘§ 96. Prohibition on overhaul, repair, and mainte8 nance of Coast Guard vessels in foreign

9 shipyards

10 ‘‘A Coast Guard vessel may not be overhauled, re11 paired, or maintained in any shipyard located outside the

12 United States, except that this section does not apply to

13 emergency repairs.’’.

14 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—Title 14, United

15 States Code, is amended in the analysis at the beginning

16 of chapter 5 by adding at the end the following:

‘‘96. Prohibition on overhaul, repair, and maintenance of Coast Guard vessels

in foreign shipyards.’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATION
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          27,810
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             118
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 8,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     94,401
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        742,994
<ALLOWANCE>                                     13,134
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 907,868
<DEPOSITS>                                     827,980
<SHORT-TERM>                                    15,372
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,197
<LONG-TERM>                                      6,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,500
<COMMON>                                         8,367
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,452
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 907,868
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 62,244
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,703
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                66,947
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              32,426
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,926
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           34,021
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,800
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 370
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 22,858
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,016
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       6,016
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,784
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .76
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.46
<LOANS-NON>                                     15,169
<LOANS-PAST>                                       113
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 2,516
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  2,629
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                14,910
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    2,110
<RECOVERIES>                                       266
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               13,134
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            13,134
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         13,134


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 17 (Thursday, January 26, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 4398]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-713]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service


Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds: Amendment--ACSTAR 
Insurance Company

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the 
Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is Supplement No. 6 to the Treasury Department Circular 
570; 2005 Revision, published July 1, 2005, at 70 FR 38502.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-7102.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The underwriting limitation for ACSTAR 
Insurance Company, which was listed in the Treasury Department Circular 
570, published on July 1, 2005, is hereby amended to read $2,737,000.
    Federal bond-approving officers should annotate their reference 
copies of the Treasury Circular 570, 2005 Revision, at 70 FR 38503 to 
reflect this change, effective today.
    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet 
http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570. A hard copy may be purchased from the 
Government Printing Office (GPO), Subscription Service, Washington, DC, 
telephone (202) 512-1800. When ordering the Circular from GPO, use the 
following stock number: 769-004-0521-0.
    Questions concerning this Notice may be directed to the U.S. 
Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial 
Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West 
Highway, Room 6F01, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

    Dated: January 13, 2006.
Vivian L. Cooper,
Director, Financial Accounting and Services Division, Financial 
Management Service.
[FR Doc. 06-713 Filed 1-25-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2792

JAMES C. MARTIN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THE PANTRY, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District

Judge. (CA-93-319-3-MU)

Submitted: January 30, 1996 Decided: February 26, 1996

Before HALL and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James C. Martin, Appellant Pro Se. Randel Eugene Phillips, Karin

Marie McGinnis, MOORE & VAN ALLEN, Charlotte, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting

Defendant's motion for summary judgment on Appellant's Age Discrimination in Employment claim. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. Martin v. Pantry Incorporated,

No. CA-93-319-3-MU (W.D.N.C. Aug. 18, 1995). We deny Defendant's

motion to strike and dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 54.1804 Participating provider obligation to offer the Affordable Connectivity Program. All participating providers in the Affordable Connectivity Program shall: ( a ) Make available the affordable connectivity benefit to eligible households.
( b ) Publicize the availability of the Affordable Connectivity Program in a manner reasonably designed to reach those likely to qualify for the service and in a manner that is accessible to individuals with disabilities.
( c ) Notify all consumers who either subscribe to or renew a subscription to an internet service offering about the Affordable Connectivity Program and how to enroll. ( 1 ) Providers shall deliver a notice in writing or orally, in a manner that is accessible to persons with disabilities: ( i ) During enrollment for new subscribers;
( ii ) At least 30 days before the date of renewal for subscribers not enrolled in the Affordable Connectivity Program who have fixed-term plans longer than one month; and
( iii ) Annually for subscribers not already enrolled in the Affordable Connectivity Program who have month-to-month or similar non-fixed term plans.
( 2 ) The notice shall, at a minimum, indicate; ( i ) The eligibility requirements for consumer participation;
( ii ) That the Affordable Connectivity Program is non-transferable and limited to one monthly internet discount and a one-time connected device discount per household;
( iii ) How to enroll, such as a customer service phone number or relevant website information; and
( iv ) That the Affordable Connectivity Program is a Federal Government benefit program operated by the Federal Communications Commission and, if the Program ends, or when a household is no longer eligible, subscribers will be subject to the provider's regular rates, terms, and conditions.
( d ) Frequently carry out public awareness campaigns in their Affordable Connectivity Program areas of service that highlight the value and benefits of broadband internet access service and the existence of the Affordable Connectivity Program in collaboration with State agencies, public interest groups, and non-profit organizations and retain documentation sufficient to demonstrate their compliance with the public awareness obligations.
[87 FR 8382, Feb. 14, 2022]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

          - 26 CFR Part 1
          - [TD 9232]
          - RIN 1545-BD33

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Correction to temporary regulation.

# SUMMARY:

                        This document contains a correction to temporary regulations that were published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on Thursday, December 8, 2005 (70 FR 72908) that provide certain elections for taxpayers that continue to be subject to the PFIC excess distribution regime of section 1291 even though the foreign corporation in which they own stock is no longer treated as a PFIC under section 1297(a) or (e).                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ethan Atticks, (202) 622-3840 (not a toll-free number).

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Background

The temporary regulation that is the subject of this correction is under sections 1291(d)(2), 1297(e) and 1298(b)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code.

## Need for Correction

As published, the temporary regulation (TD 9232) contain an error that may prove to be misleading and is in need of clarification.

## Correction of Publication

Accordingly, the publication of the temporary regulation (TD 9232), which were the subject of FR Doc. 05-23630, is corrected as follows:

                        On page 72909, column 1, in the preamble under the caption heading                         **DATES**                        , lines 4 and 5, the language “applicability, see §§ 1.1297-3T(f),1.1298-3T(f) is corrected to read “applicability, see §§ 1.1291-9T(K), 1.1297-3T(f), and 1.1298-3T(f).”.                    

Cynthia E. Grigsby, 

Acting Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel, (Procedure and Administration).

[FR Doc. 06-683 Filed 1-24-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
404 A.2d 1354

#### Commonwealth v. Brutko, Appellant.

Submitted September 15, 1978.

Taylor P. Andrews, Public Defender, for appellant; Edgar B. Bayley, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before PRICE, HESTER and HOFFMAN, JJ.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

HOFFMAN, J., concurred in the result.
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

| 1) | to                the best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements                of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2) | to                the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report                fairly                presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result                of                operations of the Company. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                    |                                                                                 |                            |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------|
| Date                  : August 7,                  2008         | By:                                                                        | /s/                Linden Boyne |
|                                                                                                    | Linden                  Boyne                                                        |
|                                                                                                    | Secretary                  / Treasurer(Principal                  Financial Officer) |

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 21, 2020

No. 04-20-00336-CV

Juana Lizeth Rios PINA,

Appellant

v.

SUN LOANS, INC.,

Appellee

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-CI-00017

Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant seeks to appeal an order granting a motion for summary judgment and 

disposing of appellant’s claims against appellee. Although the clerk’s record filed on August 19, 

2020 contains appellant’s motion for partial non-suit of its claims against a second defendant, the 

record does not contain an order dismissing appellant’s claims against that party. Therefore, the 

order granting summary judgment does not dispose of all parties, and no severance order appears 

in the record. An order that does not dispose of all parties and causes of action is not final and 

appealable. Northeast Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Aldridge, 400 S.W.2d 893, 895 (Tex. 1966). 

It is therefore ORDERED that appellant show cause in writing within fifteen (15) days of 

the date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The 

briefing schedule is suspended pending our determination of whether we have jurisdiction over 

this appeal. 

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of August, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
EXHIBIT 10.2

March 21, 2006

Dr. B.J Bormann

Strategic Alliances

Pfizer Inc,

50 Pequot Avenue,

New London, CT 06320

RE: Fourth Amending Letter of Agreement between Pfizer Inc. and Immunicon Corporation

Dear Dr. Bormann:

Immunicon
Corporation (Immunicon) wishes to amend the agreement between Pfizer Inc. and its Affiliates (Pfizer) and Immunicon, executed on February 10, 2003 having a termination date of February 10, 2004, which was amended
effective March 23, 2004 to terminate on February 10, 2005, and subsequently amended by a Second Amending Letter of Agreement dated December 12, 2004, to terminate the sooner of February 10, 2006 or the end of the clinical
research study contemplated in the revised Appendix A under the agreement (as amended, the 2003 Agreement). A Third amending letter dated March 7, 2006, extended the study contemplated in Appendix A to the completion of the clinical
research study. Collectively, the original 2003 agreement and all of the foregoing amendments are referred to hereinafter as the Agreement. This Fourth Amending Letter is intended to permit the parties to add new clinical research
studies on an ongoing basis under the Agreement by the addition of new Appendices duly signed by both parties. These specific Appendices shall include all terms and conditions which may be agreed upon in good faith by the parties relating to such
studies, and in any event shall include all terms and conditions which are reasonably and customarily required for any new clinical research studies that are mutually agreed upon.

All other terms and conditions of the Agreement, except as amended above, shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect for the remainder of the Term of the Agreement as herein extended.

If you are in agreement with the foregoing, please so indicate by signing duplicate copies of this letter in the space provided below, and return one fully signed copy
to us, to the attention of Dr. Avijit Roy, Senior Director, Corporate Development.

Sincerely,



|                      |  |                          |  |                          
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------ |  | -------------------------
|Immunicon Corporation |  | Acknowledged and Agreed:
|                      |  | Pfizer, Inc.            
|                      |  |                         
|/s/ Byron D. Hewett   |  | By:                      |  | /s/ B. J. Bormann        
|Byron D. Hewett       |  | Name:                    |  | B. J. Bormann            
|President and CEO     |  | Title:                   |  | V.P., Strategic Alliances
|                      |  | Date:                    |  | March 21, 2006