alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 32.6121 Land and building expense. ( a ) This account shall include expenses associated with land and buildings (excluding amortization of leasehold improvements). This account shall also include janitorial service, cleaning supplies, water, sewage, fuel and guard service, and electrical power.
( b ) The cost of electrical power used to operate the telecommunications network shall be charged to Account 6531, Power Expense, and the cost of separately metered electricity used for operating specific types of equipment, such as computers, shall be charged to the expense account appropriate for such use.
No. 11-9541.

#### Cruz *v.*Illinois.

App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Cer-tiorari denied.
No. 11-8751.

#### Delao *v.*Long, Acting Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 99.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned officer of US SEARCH.com Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i)  the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: May 15, 2003 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    BRENT N.
COHEN
|------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------------
|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                      



The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
§ 73.1570 Modulation levels: AM and FM. ( a ) The percentage of modulation is to be maintained at as high a level as is consistent with good quality of transmission and good broadcast service, with maximum levels not to exceed the values specified in paragraph (b). Generally, the modulation should not be less than 85% on peaks of frequent recurrence, but where lower modulation levels may be required to avoid objectionable loudness or to maintain the dynamic range of the program material, the degree of modulation may be reduced to whatever level is necessary for this purpose, even though under such circumstances, the level may be substantially less than that which produces peaks of frequent recurrence at a level of 85%.
( b ) Maximum modulation levels must meet the following limitations: ( 1 ) *AM stations.* In no case shall the amplitude modulation of the carrier wave exceed 100% on negative peaks of frequent recurrence, or 125% on positive peaks at any time. ( i ) AM stations transmitting stereophonic programs not exceed the AM maximum stereophonic transmission signal modulation specifications of stereophonic system in use.
( ii ) For AM stations transmitting telemetry signals for remote control or automatic transmission system operation, the amplitude of modulation of the carrier by the use of subaudible tones must not be higher than necessary to effect reliable and accurate data transmission and may not, in any case, exceed 6%.
( 2 ) *FM stations.* The total modulation must not exceed 100 percent on peaks of frequent reoccurrence referenced to 75 kHz deviation. However, stations providing subsidiary communications services using subcarriers under provisions of § 73.319 concurrently with the broadcasting of stereophonic or monophonic programs may increase the peak modulation deviation as follows: ( i ) The total peak modulation may be increased 0.5 percent for each 1.0 percent subcarrier injection modulation.
( ii ) In no event may the modulation of the carrier exceed 110 percent (82.5 kHz peak deviation).
( 3 ) [Reserved]
( c ) If a limiting or compression amplifier is employed to maintain modulation levels, precaution must be taken so as not to substantially alter the dynamic characteristics of programs.
[44 FR 58735, Oct. 11, 1979, as amended at 47 FR 13165, Mar. 29, 1982; 49 FR 14508, Apr. 12, 1984; 49 FR 15081, Apr. 17, 1984; 49 FR 27147, July 2, 1984; 49 FR 47610, Dec. 6, 1984; 49 FR 48312, Dec. 12, 1984; 51 FR 26251, July 22, 1986; 56 FR 64872, Dec. 12, 1991; 65 FR 30004, May 10, 2000; 89 FR 7255, Feb. 1, 2024]
§ 27.15 Geographic partitioning and spectrum disaggregation. ( a ) *Eligibility.* ( 1 ) Parties seeking approval for partitioning and disaggregation shall request from the Commission an authorization for partial assignment of a license pursuant to § 1.948.
( 2 ) AWS and WCS licensees may apply to partition their licensed geographic service area or disaggregate their licensed spectrum at any time following the grant of their licenses.
( b ) *Technical Standards* — ( 1 ) *Partitioning.* In the case of partitioning, applicants and licensees must file FCC Form 603 pursuant to section 1.948 and list the partitioned service area on a schedule to the application. The geographic coordinates must be specified in degrees, minutes, and seconds to the nearest second of latitude and longitude and must be based upon the 1983 North American Datum (NAD83).
( 2 ) *Disaggregation.* Spectrum may be disaggregated in any amount.
( 3 ) *Combined partitioning and disaggregation.* The Commission will consider requests for partial assignment of licenses that propose combinations of partitioning and disaggregation.
( 4 ) *Signal levels.* For purposes of partitioning and disaggregation, part 27 systems must be designed so as not to exceed the signal level specified for the particular spectrum block in § 27.55 at the licensee's service area boundary, unless the affected adjacent service area licensees have agreed to a different signal level.
( c ) *License term.* The license term for a partitioned license area and for disaggregated spectrum shall be the remainder of the original licensee's license term as provided for in § 27.13.
[62 FR 9658, Mar. 3, 1997, as amended at 63 FR 68954, Dec. 14, 1998; 65 FR 3146, Jan. 20, 2000; 65 FR 57268, Sept. 21, 2000; 67 FR 45373, July 9, 2002; 69 FR 5715, Feb. 6, 2004; 72 FR 48848, Aug. 24, 2007; 78 FR 8268, Feb. 5, 2013; 78 FR 50255, Aug. 16, 2013; 79 FR 596, Jan. 6, 2014; 79 FR 32412, June 4, 2014; 79 FR 48537, Aug. 15, 2014; 82 FR 41548, Sept. 1, 2017]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1267

ALLAN L. GANT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE; SAM SAMPLES, F.P., Chief Probation Officer; DAVIS N. LEWIS, Deputy Chief Probation Officer; KENNETH SALES, JR., U.S.P.O., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, District Judge. (CA-97-335-5) Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 21, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Allan L. Gant, Appellant Pro Se. Rebecca A. Betts, United States Attorney, Stephen Michael Horn, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and the districtcourt’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gant v. United States Probation Office , No. CA-97-335-5 (S.D.W. Va. Feb. 13, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF
GERHARD E. KURZ, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULE 15d-14(b)

The undersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer of Seabulk Transport,
Inc., general partner of Seabulk Trankers, Ltd., general partner of Seabulk
America Partnership, Ltd. (the Partnership), does hereby certify that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the
Form 10-Q) of the Partnership fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

| |  |                                                                   | 
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| |  | /s/ Gerhard E. Kurz
Name: Gerhard E. Kurz
Date: December 22, 2003
§ 73.23 AM broadcast station applications affected by international agreements. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, no application for an AM station will be accepted for filing if authorization of the facilities requested would be inconsistent with international commitments of the United States under treaties and other international agreements, arrangements and understandings. (See list of such international instruments in § 73.1650(b)). Any such application that is inadvertently accepted for filing will be dismissed.
( b ) AM applications that involve conflicts only with the North American Regional Broadcasting Agreement (NARBA), but that are in conformity with the remaining treaties and other international agreements listed in § 73.1650(b) and with the other requirements of this part 73, will be granted subject to such modifications as the FCC may subsequently find appropriate, taking international considerations into account.
( c ) In the case of any application designated for hearing on issues other than those related to consistency with international relationships and as to which no final decision has been rendered, whenever action under this section becomes appropriate because of inconsistency with international relationships, the applicant involved shall, notwithstanding the provisions §§ 73.3522 and 73.3571, be permitted to amend its application to achieve consistency with such relationships. In such cases the provisions of § 73.3605(c) will apply.
( d ) In some circumstances, special international considerations may require that the FCC, in acting on applications, follow procedures different from those established for general use. In such cases, affected applicants will be informed of the procedures to be followed.
[56 FR 64856, Dec. 12, 1991]
Exhibit 99(b)



CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  FOR PPL TRANSITION BOND COMPANY, LLC'S 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31,
  2003



In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PPL Transition Bond
  Company, LLC (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, as filed
  with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered
  Report"), I, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer
  of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that:

- The Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
    or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

- The information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.







|Date: May 12, 2003 | /s/ James E. Abel
        James E. Abel
        Manager
        (principal executive officer/principal financial officer)
|------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                   |                                                                                                                          







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
  the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 26, 2019

No. 04-19-00374-CV

Adam REPOSA,

Appellants

v.

Keith HENNEKE and David Escamilla,

Appellees

From the 425th Judicial District Court, Williamson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18-1071-C425

Honorable David Peeples, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant has filed a motion requesting additional time in which to file his brief.

Appellant’s motion is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is due on or before January 10, 2020.

Further requests for an extension of time in which to file appellant’s brief will be 

disfavored.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 26th day of November, 2019.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
Editorial Note on Part 36
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 74 FR 23956, May 22, 2009, 77 FR 30411, May 23, 2012, 82 FR 25538, June 2, 2017, and corrected at 83 FR 4153, Jan. 30, 2018. Nomenclature changes to part 36 also appear at 83 FR 63587, Dec. 11, 2018, and 84 FR 4360, Feb. 15, 2019.

§ 36.375 Published directory listing. ( a ) This classification includes expenses for preparing or purchasing, compiling and disseminating directory listings.
( b ) Published directory expense is assigned as follows: ( 1 ) Classified directory expense and all expense of soliciting advertising is assigned to the exchange operation.
( 2 ) The expense of alphabetical and street address directories and traffic information records is apportioned among the operations on the basis of the relative number of study area subscriber line minutes-of-use applicable to each operation.
( 3 ) The expense associated with directories and traffic information records prepared for one locality and used in another locality is known as “foreign directories expense.” Such expense is assigned to the appropriate operation on the basis of the location of the point where used with respect to the locality for which the directories and records were prepared.
( 4 ) Effective July 1, 2001, through December 31, 2024, study areas subject to price cap regulation, pursuant to § 61.41 of this chapter, shall assign the balance of Account 6620-Services to the classifications, as specified in paragraphs (b)(1) through (3) of this section, based on the relative percentage assignment of the balance of Account 6620 to these classifications during the twelve-month period ending December 31, 2000.
( 5 ) Effective July 1, 2001, through December 31, 2024, all study areas shall apportion Published directory listing expenses using the underlying relative use measurements, as specified in paragraphs (b)(1) through (3) of this section, during the twelve-month period ending December 31, 2000. Direct assignment of any Publishing directory listing expense to the jurisdictions shall be updated annually.
[52 FR 17229, May 6, 1987, as amended at 66 FR 33207, June 21, 2001; 71 FR 65746, Nov. 9, 2006; 75 FR 30301, June 1, 2010; 76 FR 30841, May 27, 2011; 79 FR 36238, June 26, 2014; 83 FR 63587, Dec. 11, 2018]
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"20-1139: BITMANAGEMENT SOFTWARE GMBH v. US [OPINION], Precedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"EWnXovnLgm\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/2-25-2021-20-1139-bitmanagement-software-gmbh-v-us-opinion-20-1139-opinion-2-25-2021_1739332\/\">20-1139: BITMANAGEMENT SOFTWARE GMBH v. US [OPINION], Precedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/2-25-2021-20-1139-bitmanagement-software-gmbh-v-us-opinion-20-1139-opinion-2-25-2021_1739332\/embed\/#?secret=EWnXovnLgm\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“20-1139: BITMANAGEMENT SOFTWARE GMBH v. US [OPINION], Precedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"EWnXovnLgm\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Opinions\/Orders posted: BITMANAGEMENT SOFTWARE GMBH v. US [OPINION](pdf) Appeal Number: 20-1139 Origin: CFC Precedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
No. 11-1191.

#### Zakzuk-Deulofeut *v.*Pennsylvania.

Super. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.
LEVITY

AERIAL

Levity Aerial | www.levityaerial.com | Boulder, CO

UAV Specifications

MODEL: T600

WEIGHT (BATTERY INCLUDED): 2935 G

HOVERING ACCURACY (GPS MODE) VERTICAL: 0.5 M

HORIZONTAL: 2.5 M

MAX ANGULAR VELOCITY PITCH: 300°/S

YAW: 150°/S

MAX TILT ANGLE: 35°

MAX ASCENT SPEED: 5 M/S

MAX DESCENT SPEED: 4 M/S

MAX SPEED: 22 M/S (ATTI MODE, NO WIND)

MAX FLIGHT ALTITUDE: 4500 M

MAX WIND SPEED RESISTANCE: 10 M/S

MAX FLIGHT TIME: APPROXIMATELY 18 MINUTES

MOTOR MODEL: DJI 3510

PROPELLER MODEL: DJI 1345

INDOOR HOVERING: ENABLED BY DEFAULT

OPERATING TEMPERATURE RANGE: -10° TO 40° C

DIAGONAL DISTANCE: 559 TO 581 MM

Dimensions 438x451x301 mm

REMOTE CONTROLLER 

NAME C1

OPERATING FREQUENCY:

922.7~927.7 MHz (Japan Only)

5.725~5.825 GHz

2.400~2.483 GHz

TRANSMITTING DISTANCE (OUTDOOR AND UNOBSTRUCTED): 2 KM

EIRP 10DBM@900M, 13DBM@5.8G, 20DBM@2.4G

VIDEO OUTPUT PORT: USB, MINI-HDMI

POWER SUPPLY: BUILT-IN BATTERY

CHARGING: DJI CHARGER

DUAL USER CAPABILITY: HOST-AND-SLAVE CONNECTION

OUTPUT POWER: 9 W

OPERATING TEMPERATURE RANGE: -10° TO 40° C

STORAGE TEMPERATURE RANGE LESS THAN 3 MONTHS: -20° TO 45° C

MORE THAN 3 MONTHS: 22° TO 28° C

CHARGING TEMPERATURE RANGE: 0-40° C

BATTERY: 6000 mAh LiPo 2S
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with this Quarterly Report of HIV-VAC Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the year period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin Murray, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the
         period ending March 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material
         respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HIV-VAC
         Inc.

Date: September 30, 2011

/s/ Kevin Murray
Kevin Murray
Chief Financial Officer
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 813/2005

of 27 May 2005         

fixing the minimum selling prices for butter for the 164th individual invitation to tender under the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 2571/97

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular Article 10 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The minimum selling prices of butter from intervention stocks and processing securities applying for the 164th individual invitation to tender, under the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 2571/97, shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 28 May 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 May 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

(2)OJ L 350, 20.12.1997, p. 3. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2250/2004 (OJ L 381, 28.12.2004, p. 25).

----

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 27 May 2005 fixing the minimum selling prices for butter for the 164th individual invitation to tender under the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 2571/97

----