alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Section
      1350**


**CERTIFICATION**








The
      undersigned officer hereby certifies
      that, to his knowledge, (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of COMFORCE
      Corporation for the quarter endedJuly 1,
      2007 as to which this Certification is
      an exhibit fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and (2) the
      information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of COMFORCE
      Corporation.








SignedAugust
      7,2007.








/s/
                Harry V. MaccarroneHarry
                V. MaccarroneExecutive
                Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### § 300-70.100 Who must report the use of first class and business class transportation accommodations?

An agency as defined in § 301-1.1 of this subtitle.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Electronic Game Card, Inc. on
Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, John  Bentley,
President  of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ John R Bentley
--------------------------------------
John R Bentley
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)


August __, 2004

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       23
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4794

To provide for expediting an investigation by the International Trade Commission by providing for the monitoring of the importation of tomatoes

and peppers under certain circumstances.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 19, 1994

Mr. POMBO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To provide for expediting an investigation by the International Trade Commission by providing for the monitoring of the importation of tomatoes and peppers under

certain circumstances.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘North American Free

5 Trade Agreement Implementation Act Amendments of

6 1994’’.
2

HR 4794 IH

1 SEC. 2. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION MONITORING

2 OF CERTAIN VEGETABLES FOR FRESH MAR3 KET USE.

4 Section 316 of the North American Free Trade

5 Agreement Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 3381), is

6 amended to read as follows:

7 ‘‘SEC. 316. MONITORING.

8 ‘‘For purposes of expediting an investigation concern9 ing provisional relief under this title or section 202 of the

10 Trade Act of 1974 regarding—

11 ‘‘(1) fresh or chilled tomatoes intended for

12 fresh-market use, if entered from December 1

13 through the following May 31, provided for in head14 ing 0702.00 of the HTS; and

15 ‘‘(2) fresh or chilled peppers, other than chili

16 peppers, intended for fresh-market use, if entered

17 from December 1 through the following May 31,

18 provided for in subheading 0709.60.00 of the HTS;

19 the International Trade Commission, until January 1,

20 2009, shall monitor imports of such goods as if proper

21 requests for such monitoring had been made under sub22 section 202(d)(1)(C)(i) of such section 202. At the request

23 of the International Trade Commission, the Secretary of

24 Agriculture and the Commissioner of Customs shall pro25 vide to the International Trade Commission information

26 relevant to the monitoring carried out under this section.’’.
3

HR 4794 IH

Æ
§ 73.1610 Equipment tests. ( a ) During the process of construction of a new broadcast station, the permittee, after notifying the FCC in Washington, D.C. may, without further authority from the FCC, conduct equipment tests for the purpose of making such adjustments and measurements as may be necessary to assure compliance with the terms of the construction permit, the technical provisions of the application therefore, the rules and regulations and the applicable engineering standards. For AM stations, equipment tests, including either a directional or nondirectional proof of performance required by the construction permit, may be conducted during daytime hours provided that the antenna system is first substantially tuned during the experimental period. The nondirectional proof shall be conducted with power adjusted to 25% of that specified in the permit for the authorized directional facilities or, if applicable, to such higher power as is specified in the same permit for authorized nondirectional facilities. For licensed stations, see § 73.1615, Operation During Modification of Facilities; and § 73.157, Antenna Testing During Daytime.
( b ) The FCC may notify the permittee not to conduct equipment tests or may modify, cancel, suspend, or change the modes of testing or the dates and times for such tests in order to resolve interference complaints or when such action may appear to be in the public interest, convenience, and necessity.
( c ) Equipment tests may be continued so long as the construction permit shall remain valid.
( d ) The authorization for tests embodied in this section shall not be construed as constituting a license to operate but as a necessary part of construction.
[43 FR 32783, July 28, 1978, as amended at 47 FR 40174, Sept. 13, 1982; 50 FR 30947, July 31, 1985]
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

| 1) | to                  the best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements                  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2) | to                  the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report                  fairly                  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and                  result of                  operations of the Company. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                      |                                                                             |                           |
|-------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|
|                                      |                                                                             |
|                                      |                                                                             |                           |
| Date: November              14, 2008 | By:                                                                    | /s/ Lee              Cole |
|                                      | Lee                Cole                                                          |
|                                      | Acting                President and Acting ChiefExecutive                Officer |

----
# iCollege 2015-2016 Catalog Now Available

/ Published Aug. 4, 2015
Please see the bottom, center of the website homepage for a picture of and link to our 2015-2016 Catalog.  Inside, you will find the latest information on this academic year's programs, any program changes, registration and admission details, and descriptions of each course.  Printed catalogs will be available soon, but please consider saving a tree and using the online version for your reference.  Questions?  Contact the iCollege Office of Student Services (OSS) at 202-685-6300 or iCollegeOSS@ndu.edu.    Thank you!
No. 11-8776.

#### Harvey *v.*California.

Sup. Ct. Cal. Certio-rari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 130 (Thursday, July 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41669-41670]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-17060]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

[Docket No. 99-15]


David P. Kelly and West Indies Shipping & Trading, Inc.--Possible 
Violations of the Shipping Act of 1984; Notice of Amendment to the 
Order of Investigation in Docket No. 99-15

    This is to give notice that the Commission has amended its Order of 
Investigation in the above-captioned proceeding.
    On August 13, 1999, the Federal Maritime Commission 
(``Commission'') issued an Order of Investigation and Hearing to 
determine whether West Indies Shipping and Trading, Inc. (``West Indies 
Shipping''), a non-vessel-operating common carrier (``NVOCC''), and its 
president and sole shareholder, David P. Kelly (``Kelley''), violated 
sections 8(a)(1), 10(a)(1), 19(a), 19(b)(1), and former section 23(a) 
(pre-OSRA) of the Shipping Act of the 1984 (``Act''), 46 U.S.C. app. 
Secs. Sec. Sec. 1707(a)(1), 1709(a)1), 1718(a), and 1718(b)(1), and 
former Secs. 1721(a). Notice of this Order was published in the Federal 
Register on August 18, 1999. 64 FR 44928.
    The Commission has determined, in response to a motion filed by the 
Commission's Bureau of Enforcement, to amend the Order of Investigation 
and Hearing to encompass section 10(b)(1) of the Act, 46 U.S.C. app 
Sections 1709(b)(1). The full text of the original Order and the 
amendment, may be viewed on the Commission's home page at www.fmc.gov, 
or at the Office of the Secretary, Room 1046, 800 N. Capitol Street, 
NW., Washington, DC. Any person may file a petition for leave to

[[Page 41670]]

intervene in accordance with 46 CFR 502.72.

Bryant L. VanBrakle,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-17060 Filed 7-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
----

            DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE         

No 22/2005

of 8 February 2005         

amending Annex XXI (Statistics) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 30 (Commission Regulation (EC) No 753/2004) of Annex XXI to the Agreement:

Article 2

The texts of Regulation (EC) No 1450/2004 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 9 February 2005, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 8 February 2005.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Richard WRIGHT            

----

(1)OJ L 133, 26.5.2005, p. 29.

(2)OJ L 267, 14.8.2004, p. 32.

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

----
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4755 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4755

  To provide for demonstration projects for worksite health promotion 
                               programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 14, 1994

Mr. Brown of Ohio (for himself and Mr. Studds) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for demonstration projects for worksite health promotion 
                               programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS FOR WORKSITE HEALTH PROMOTION 
              PROGRAMS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall 
conduct a demonstration project to evaluate the effectiveness of health 
promotion programs in the worksite (or another location proximate and 
accessible to employees) and appropriate incentives to encourage 
employers to adopt such programs.
    (b) Scope.--The project shall assess programs of various size, 
scope, and type as to their effect on health status, medical risk 
factors, lifestyle, disability, morbidity, mortality, and productivity.
    (c) Sites.--The project shall be conducted at multiple sites which 
will allow the assessment of demographic factors, including age, sex, 
employment status, employer, geographic status, programs costs, and 
savings attributable to each program type.
    (d) Duration of Project.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
the enactment of this Act the Secretary shall begin the project. The 
project shall continue for a period of 3 years, which the Secretary may 
extend for up to 2 additional years.
    (e) Reports.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall submit to Congress--
                    (A) an annual interim report of the progress of the 
                project during the period of the project, and
                    (B) a final report on the project within 1 year 
                after the completion of the project.
            (2) Information included.--Such reports shall include 
        information on--
                    (A) the services included in programs under the 
                project and their cost effectiveness, and
                    (B) the cost effectiveness, type, and amount of 
                financial incentives provided under the project.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $25,000,000, without fiscal year limitation, to carry out 
this section.
                                 <all>
```
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4714

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore the exception to

the market discount rules for tax-exempt obligations.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 30, 1994

Mr. CARDIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore

the exception to the market discount rules for tax-exempt

obligations.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RESTORATION OF EXCEPTION FROM MARKET

4 DISCOUNT RULES FOR TAX-EXEMPT OBLIGA5 TIONS.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 1278(a)

7 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining market

8 discount bond) is amended—

9 (1) by adding at the end of subparagraph (B)

10 the following new clause:
2

•HR 4714 IH

1 ‘‘(iv) TAX-EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS.—

2 Any tax-exempt obligation (as defined in

3 section 1275(a)(3)).’’, and

4 (2) by striking subparagraph (C) and redesig5 nating subparagraph (D) as subparagraph (C).

6 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

7 (1) Sections 1276(a)(4) and 1278(b)(1) of such

8 Code are each amended by striking ‘‘103,’’.

9 (2) Subparagraph (B) of section 1278(a)(4) of

10 such Code is amended by striking ‘‘or, in the case

11 of a tax-exempt obligation’’ and all that follows and

12 inserting a period.

13 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

14 this section shall apply to obligations purchased (within

15 the meaning of section 1272(d)(1) of the Internal Revenue

16 Code of 1986) after April 30, 1993.

Æ
#### § 27.1103 2000-2020 MHz and 2180-2200 MHz bands subject to competitive bidding.

Mutually exclusive initial applications for 2000-2020 MHz and 2180-2200 MHz band licenses are subject to competitive bidding. The general competitive bidding procedures set forth in 47 CFR part 1, subpart Q will apply unless otherwise provided in this subpart.

[78 FR 8270, Feb. 5, 2013]
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            College of Information and Cyberspace
                    National Defense University
                CIC
        Search
                    Search CIC:
                        Search
                Search CIC:
                    Search
    Home

    About 
        Mission & Vision

    Faculty & Staff

    Fact Sheet

    Alumni

    Internships

    FAQ

    Admissions 
        Eligibility Requirements

    Admissions Calendar

    Application Instructions

    Apply Online

    International Students

    Academics 
        Graduate Catalog

    M.S. in Strategic Information and Cyberspace Studies
        
        JPME Master's Degree

    Cyber Workforce Master's Degree (Part Time)

    Leadership Development Programs

    Graduate Certificates

    Academic Partners

    Current Students 
        JPME II  Incoming Students

    LDP Incoming Students

    Student Registration

    Bring Your Own Device

    IA Compliance

    Completion Procedures / Order Transcripts

    Student Services and Resources

    Events
    
        Cyber Beacon

    Cyber PME Colloquium

    Hopper Award

    Lecture Series

    CYBERCOM Symposium

    NEWS

    UC2
    
        About

    Events

    Work With Us

    Center for Cybersecurity
    
        About

    Cybersecurity Center POC

    Cybersecurity Supporting Faculty

    CAE-CDE CISO Certificate Program

    Cybersecurity Trending News

    Cyber Labs
        
        Ethical Hacking

    Critical Infrastructure - SCADA

    Cyber Exercises
        
        Tabletop Exercise

    Cyber Competitions

    Cyber Resources and Awareness

    Stakeholder / Industry Advisory Council

    Contact 
        Contact Us

    Directions

    Access to Ft. McNair

    Map of Ft. McNair  Home
  NEWS
  News & Announcements
 News & Announcements News
 UC2 Kickoff Event UC2
 The UC4 team at the NDU CIC hosted the inaugural UC2 Kickoff Event. The physical location of the event was the Hill Conference Room (Room #303) on the third floor of Roosevelt Hall at Fort McNair in Washington, D.C. 
 
Attendees included members of the Joint Staff J6, the NSA, USCYBERCOM, high-level DoD officials and staff members, a Congressional staff member, the NDU CIC Chancellor, the UC4 Director, and the Director of the UC2 Support Center. The keynote address was given by the Honorable Heidi Shyu, Under Secretary of Defense, Research and Engineering (OUSD(R&E)).
 SHARE
 PRINT
 National Defense University


College of Information and Cyberspace

300 Fifth Ave., Bldg. 62
Fort Lesley J. McNair
Washington, DC 20319-5066

202-685-6300
                    Stay Connected
                
                
                DOD Privacy & Security
 DOD Links Disclaimer
 DOD Social Media Policy
 DOD Web Policy
 FOIA
 NDU System of Records Notice
 NDU Privacy & Security Notice
 No FEAR Act
 Open GOV
 Plain Writing Act
 Section 508
 Small Business Act
 USA.gov
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### § 54.411 [Reserved]
#### Jesus M. VELA-MARTINEZ; Elvira Ledesma-Guiterrez, Petitioners, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-73344.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 15, 2004.*

Decided March 23, 2004.

Jessica Dominguez, Esq., Van Nuys, CA, for Petitioners.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Lagu-na Niguel, CA, Los Angeles District Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, San Francisco, CA, Earle B. Wilson, Leslie McKay, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before B. FLETCHER, WARDLAW and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jesus M. Vela-Martinez and his wife Elvira Ledesma-Guiterrez, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the Immigration Judge’s decision denying their application for suspension of deportation. Because the transitional rules apply, *Kalaw v. INS,*133 F.3d 1147, 1150 (9th Cir.1997), we have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a). We review for substantial evidence. *Id.*at 1151. We grant the petition for review, and remand to the BIA for further consideration.

Because Petitioners did not present their ineffective assistance of counsel or procedural due process claims to the BIA, these claims are dismissed for failure to satisfy the administrative exhaustion requirement. *See Ontiveros-Lopez v. INS,*213 F.3d 1121, 1124 (9th Cir.2000) (ineffective assistance of counsel argument must first be presented to the BIA); *Sanchez-Cruz v. INS,*255 F.3d 775, 780 (9th Cir. 2001) (challenges to procedural errors correctable by the administrative tribunal must be exhausted).

*984Substantial evidence does not support the conclusion that Petitioners failed to establish the requisite seven-years physical presence for suspension of deportation because documents in the Administrative Record corroborate Petitioners’ testimony that they have been continuously present in the United States since 1989. *See Ka-law,*133 F.3d at 1151.

Nor does substantial evidence support the BIA’s finding that Petitioners are precluded from showing good moral character. There was not substantial evidence that they gave false testimony or submitted false documentation for the purpose of obtaining an immigration benefit. *See 8*U.S.C. § 1101(f)(6); *Bernal v. INS,*154 F.3d 1020, 1022 (9th Cir.1998).

Therefore, we grant the petition for review and remand to the BIA for further proceedings to consider whether Petitioners’ deportation to Mexico would result in extreme hardship to their United States citizen children. *See INS v. Ventura,*537 U.S. 12, 123 S.Ct. 353, 355-56,154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED and REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.