alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4501 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4501

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
at 46 East Ohio Street in Indianapolis, Indiana, as the ``Holder-Noland 
            Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 26, 1994

  Mr. Jacobs introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Public Works and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
at 46 East Ohio Street in Indianapolis, Indiana, as the ``Holder-Noland 
            Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 46 
East Ohio Street in Indianapolis, Indiana, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Holder-Noland Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``Holder-Noland Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

                                 <all>
```
#### § 73.27 Local channels; Class C stations.

Within the conterminous 48 states, the following frequencies are designated as local channels, and are assigned for use by Class C stations: 1230, 1240, 1340, 1400, 1450, and 1490 kHz.

[56 FR 64857, Dec. 12, 1991]
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4608 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4608

To authorize appropriations for the Patent and Trademark Office in the 
  Department of Commerce for fiscal year 1995, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 21, 1994

  Mr. Hughes (for himself and Mr. Moorhead) introduced the following 
       bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize appropriations for the Patent and Trademark Office in the 
  Department of Commerce for fiscal year 1995, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Patent and Trademark Office 
Authorization Act of 1994''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF AMOUNTS AVAILABLE TO THE PATENT AND TRADEMARK 
              OFFICE.

    There is authorized to be appropriated to the Patent and Trademark 
Office for Salaries and necessary expenses the sum of $107,000,000 for 
fiscal year 1995, to be derived from deposits in the Patent and 
Trademark Office Fee Surcharge Fund established under section 10101 of 
the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 (35 U.S.C. note).

SEC. 3. AMOUNTS AUTHORIZED TO BE CARRIED OVER.

    Amounts appropriated or made available pursuant to this Act shall 
remain available until expended.

SEC. 4. EMPLOYMENT LEVEL IN PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE.

    Section 3 of title 35, United States Code, is amended by adding at 
the end the following new subsection:
    ``(f)(1) During the 5-year period beginning on October 1, 1994, no 
reductions may be made in the number of full-time equivalent employees 
of the Patent and Trademark Office, except to the extent that--
            ``(A) a law is enacted that requires reductions in 
        personnel or positions specifically in the Patent and Trademark 
        Office, or
            ``(B) the Commissioner determines that a reduction in the 
        number of full-time equivalents is in the best interests of the 
        Patent and Trademark Office and the public.
    ``(2) During the 5-year period referred to in paragraph (1), any 
law imposing a restriction on hiring by executive agencies, or 
requiring reductions in force in executive agencies, for the purpose of 
achieving reductions in the Federal work force shall not apply to the 
Patent and Trademark Office.
    ``(3) A law may not be construed as suspending or modifying this 
subsection, except to the extent such law specifically refers to or 
amends this subsection.''.

                                 <all>
```
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4140 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
Order filed September 11, 2014.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00583

- CV

____________ ALPER KARAALI , Appellant

V. PETROLEUM WHOLESALE, L.P. , Appellee

On Appeal from the 333rd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Cou rt Cause No. 2011

- 44275



### ORDER
On July 18, 2014, appellant filed a notice of appeal from a final judgment signed April 5, 2014. In response to this court’s notice, appellant has also filed a motion to extend time to file his notice of appeal. Appellant fi led a pauper’s affidavit in the trial court with his notice of appeal. On August 1, 2014, appellant
also filed an affidavit of inability to pay costs in this court. On August 4, 2014, appellant supplemented his request for a waiver of costs and fees with a copy of his 2013 joint tax return, his wife’s W

- 2 form, and a premarital agreement stating eachparty’s income is separate property.

The record has not been filed in this appeal, and both the district clerk’s office and the court reporters have stated ap pellant has not paid for preparation of the record. On August 27, 2014, one of the court reporters on this case notified this court that appellant ’s request to proceed as a pauper was denied by the trial court on August 18, 2014. On August 28, 2014, appell ant notified this court that at the hearing on the contest to appellant’s claim of indigence, the county’s counsel argued that appellant was underemployed. Appellant stated that the court gave the county time to produce case law supporting its position, an d that he is still waiting on the trial court’s decision. Therefore, it is unclear whether the trial court has ruled on appellant’s indigence claim. Accordingly, we issue the following order:
We order the Harris County District Clerk to file a partial cler k’s record with the
clerk of this court on or before September 26, 2014. In order that this court may ascertain its jurisdiction over the appeal and appellant’s indigence claim, the partial
clerk’s record shall contain (1) the judgment being appealed; (2) any motion for new trial, other post

-

judgment motion, or request for findings of fact and conclusions of law; (3) the notice of appeal (4) appellant’s affidavit of indigence; (5) the contest(s) to the affidavit of indigence, if any; (6) the trial court’s o rder ruling on any contest; (7) any other documents pertaining to the claim of indigence and the contest ( s ) thereto.
If any of the requested documents are not a part of the case file, the district clerk’s
office is directed to file a certified statement t hat the document is not part of the case file.

PER CURIAM
Editorial Note on Part 74
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 74 appear at 64 FR 4055, Jan. 27, 1999.

§ 74.784 Rebroadcasts. ( a ) The term *rebroadcast* means the reception by radio of the programs or other signals of a radio or television station and the simultaneous or subsequent retransmission of such programs or signals for direct reception by the general public.
( b ) The licensee of a low power TV or TV translator station shall not rebroadcast the programs of any other TV broadcast station or other station authorized under the provisions of this subpart without obtaining prior consent of the station whose signals or programs are proposed to be retransmitted. The FCC shall be notified of the call letters of each station rebroadcast, and the licensee of the low power TV or TV broadcast translator station shall certify it has obtained written consent from the licensee of the station whose programs are being retransmitted. This notification shall be provided by email to *TVRebroadcast@fcc.gov ,* the Video Division's email box.
( c ) A TV translator station may rebroadcast only programs and signals that are simultaneously transmitted by a TV broadcast station.
( d ) [Reserved]
( e ) The provisions of § 73.1207 of part 73 of this chapter apply to low power TV stations in transmitting any material during periods of program origination obtained from the transmissions of any other type of station.
[28 FR 13722, Dec. 14, 1963, as amended at 47 FR 21502, May 18, 1982; 52 FR 31405, Aug. 20, 1987; 63 FR 33879, June 22, 1998; 67 FR 13234, Mar. 21, 2002; 87 FR 58204, Sept. 23, 2022; 88 FR 30670, May 12, 2023]
No. 10-10558.

#### Harrimon *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
#### JOHN M. DODD AND ALEXANDER M. ROSS, Respondents, *v.*EDWARD DREYFUS, Appellant.

*When a retiring partner becomes a mere surety for the firm*debts— *in such case he is released by an extension of the time of their payment by the creditor*— *e. g.*■ — • *talcing notes payable in futuro.*

Appeal by the defendant Edward Dreyfus from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered against him by direction of the judge at the circuit, for $2,312.66. The action was brought to recover rent due to the plaintiff.

The court at General Term said: “ Although the articles of partnership were excluded, yet the evidence which was received, without objection, clearly shows that such partnership did exist between the defendant Edward Dreyfus and M. J. *&*S. M. Hyatt, for the manufacture of lime in the county of Ulster, and that the same was dissolved, and that the defendant Dreyfus retired from the business, which was continued by the Hyatts, who assumed the payment of the debts of the old firm, including the rent which was due to the plaintiffs. The evidence shows that the plaintiffs had knowledge of the foregoing facts. A new lease was executed by the plaintiffs to the Hyatts of the same premises, and the latter gave to the plaintiffs a note for $3,400, for the rent which had become due, which was indorsed by one Benedict Dreyfus, upon which note there was paid $1,400, and a new note taken by the plaintiffs for the balance $2,000, which was executed June 28, 1875,-payable one month after its date. We do not perceive, from the evidence, that the defendant, Edward Dreyfus, was at the time aware of the arrangement by which the notes were executed to secure the payment of the rent. The acceptanee of such notes, under the circumstances, had the effect to *601extend the time for the payment of the rent, and that too, it would seem, without the knowledge and consent of Edward Dreyfus. The dissolution of the partnership, and the retirement of Edward Dreyfus, and the assumption by the Hyatts of the debts of the old firm, constituted Edward Dreyfus merely a surety for the payment of such debts, including the rent in question, and the extension by the plaintiffs of the time for the payment of such rent, with a knowledge of all the circumstances, and without the consent of Edward Dreyfus, had the effect to discharge his liability for such rent. (Millerdv. Thorn, 56 N. Y., 402; *061-grove*v. *Tollman,*67 id., 95.)”

*Blumenstiel & Ascher,*for the appellant. *A. J. Vanderpoel,*for the respondents.

Opinion by

Ingalls, P. J. ;

Potter, J., concurred.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered,, with costs to abide the event.
Editorial Note on Part 74
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 74 appear at 64 FR 4055, Jan. 27, 1999.

§ 74.3 FCC inspections of stations. ( a ) The licensee of a station authorized under this part must make the station available for inspection by representatives of the FCC during the station's business hours, or at any time it is in operation.
( b ) In the course of an inspection or investigation, an FCC representative may require special equipment tests or program tests.
( c ) The logs and records required by this part for the particular class or type of station must be made available upon request to representatives of the FCC.
[47 FR 53022, Nov. 24, 1982]
§ 32.2690 Intangibles. ( a ) This account shall include the cost of organizing and incorporating the company, the original cost of government franchises, the original cost of patent rights, and other intangible property having a life of more than one year and used in connection with the company's telecommunications operations.
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) The cost of other intangible assets, not including software, having a life of one year or less shall be charged directly to Account 6564, Amortization expense—intangible. Such intangibles acquired at small cost may also be charged to Account 6564, irrespective of their term of life. The cost of software having a life of one year or less shall be charged directly to the applicable expense account with which the software is associated.
( d ) The amortization associated with the costs recorded in the Intangibles account will be credited directly to this asset account, leaving a balance representing the unamortized cost.
( e ) This account shall not include any discounts on securities issued, nor shall it include costs incident to negotiating loans, selling bonds or other evidences of debt, or expenses in connection with the authorization, issuance, sale or resale of capital stock.
( f ) When charges are made to this account for expenses incurred in mergers, consolidations, or reorganizations, amounts previously included in this account on the books of the various companies concerned shall not be carried over.
( g ) Franchise taxes payable annually or more frequently shall be charged to Account 7240, Operating other taxes.
( h ) This account shall not include the cost of plant, material and supplies, or equipment furnished to municipalities or other governmental authorities when given other than as initial consideration for franchises or similar rights. (Note also Account 6720, General & administrative).
( i ) This account shall not include the original cost of easements, rights of way, and similar rights in land having a term of more than one year. Such amounts shall be recorded in Account 2111, Land, or in the appropriate outside plant account (see Accounts 2411 through 2441), or in the appropriate central office account (see Accounts 2211 through 2232).
[67 FR 5687, Feb. 6, 2002, as amended at 69 FR 53649, Sept. 2, 2004; 82 FR 20841, May 4, 2017]
Editorial Note on Part 74
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 74 appear at 64 FR 4055, Jan. 27, 1999.

§ 74.533 Remote control and unattended operation. ( a ) Aural broadcast STL and intercity relay stations may be operated by remote control provided that such operation is conducted in accordance with the conditions listed below: ( 1 ) The remote control system must provide adequate monitoring and control functions to permit proper operation of the station.
( 2 ) The remote control system must be designed, installed, and protected so that the transmitter can only be activated or controlled by persons authorized by the licensee.
( 3 ) The remote control system must prevent inadvertent transmitter operation due to malfunctions in circuits between the control point and transmitter.
( b ) Aural broadcast auxiliary stations may be operated unattended subject to the following provisions: ( 1 ) The transmitter shall be provided with adequate safeguards to prevent improper operation of the equipment.
( 2 ) The transmitter installation shall be adequately protected against tampering by unauthorized persons.
( 3 ) Whenever an unattended aural broadcast auxiliary station is used, appropriate observations must be made at the receiving end of the circuit as often as necessary to ensure proper station operation. However, an aural broadcast STL (and any aural broadcast microwave booster station) associated with a radio or TV broadcast station operated by remote control may be observed by monitoring the broadcast station's transmitted signal at the remote control or ATS monitoring point.
( c ) The FCC may notify the licensee to cease or modify operation in the case of frequency usage disputes, interference or similar situations where such action appears to be in the public interest, convenience and necessity.
(Sec. 318, 48 Stat. 1089, as amended by sec. 1, 74 Stat. 363; 47 U.S.C. 318)
[28 FR 13716, Dec. 14, 1963, as amended at 47 FR 55936, Dec. 14, 1982; 49 FR 7130, Feb. 27, 1984; 50 FR 32417, Aug. 12, 1985; 50 FR 48599, Nov. 26, 1985; 60 FR 55483, Nov. 1, 1995]
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 10 U.S.C.  Section  1350 as adopted  pursuant to Section 1350 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  in  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of
Electronic Game Card, Inc. on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending  September 30,
2005, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report") for electronic Game Card, Inc., (the "Company"),  the undersigned
hereby certifies that:

1)    to  the  best  of  my  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with  the
      requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of
      1934; and

2)    to the best of my  knowledge,  the  information  contained  in the  Report
      fairly presents,  in all material  respects,  the financial  condition and
      result of operations of the Company.


May 15, 2006

/S/ LEE COLE
---------------------------------
    LEE COLE
    ACTING PRESIDENT AND ACTING
    CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Trade Commission

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sandra M. Peay, Contact Representative or Renee Hallman, Contact Representative, Federal Trade Commission, Premerger Notification Office, Bureau of Competition, Room H-303, Washington, DC 20580; (202) 326-3100.

By direction of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 06-7139  Filed 8-24-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
No. 11-6009.

#### Erby *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
No. 11-5755.

#### Moormann *v.*Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
V

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4837

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade and fisheries for the vessel ATTITUDE.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 26, 1994

Mr. LANCASTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade and fisheries

for the vessel ATTITUDE.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

4 Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the Act of June 19, 1886

5 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and sections 12106 and 12108 of

6 title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transpor7 tation may issue a certificate of documentation with ap8 propriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise
2

•HR 4837 IH

1 trade and the fisheries for the vessel ATTITUDE (State

2 of North Carolina official number NC3607AN).

Æ
No. 11-5990.

#### Wetherald *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 18.1

February 14, 2011

Board
of Directors
ArthroCare Corporation
7500 Rialto Boulevard
Building Two, Suite 100
Austin, TX 78735

Dear
Directors:

We
are providing this letter to you for inclusion as an exhibit to your Form 10-K filing pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

We
have audited the consolidated financial statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and issued our
report thereon dated February 14, 2011. Note 3 to the financial statements describes a change in accounting principle related to the change in the date of the annual goodwill impairment
test under Accounting Standards
Codification 350,IntangiblesGoodwill and Other(ASC 350). It should be understood that the preferability of one acceptable method of
accounting over another for the change in the date of the annual goodwill impairment test under ASC 350 has not been addressed in any authoritative accounting literature, and in expressing our
concurrence below we have relied on management's determination that this change in accounting principle is preferable. Based on our reading of management's stated reasons and justification for this
change in accounting principle in the Form 10-K, and our discussions with management as to their judgment about the relevant business planning factors relating to the change, we
concur with management that such change represents, in the Company's circumstances, the adoption of a preferable accounting principle in conformity with Accounting Standards Codification 250, Accounting Changes and Error
Corrections.

Very
truly yours,

/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

---



QuickLinks