alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 10 QS B AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                 0001082678
<NAME>                   ZEB ORO EXPLORATIONS INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                            US DOLLARS

<S>                      <C>                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>            3-MOS                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1999         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                       JAN-01-2000         JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                         MAR-31-2000         MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1.000               1.000
<CASH>                                       447                   0
<SECURITIES>                                   0                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             447                   0
<PP&E>                                         0                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               447                   0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     12,066                   0
<BONDS>                                        0                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0                   0
<PREFERRED>                                    0                   0
<COMMON>                                  25,200                   0
<OTHER-SE>                               (36,819)                  0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 447                   0
<SALES>                                        0                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0                   0
<CGS>                                          0                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           5,819                4,410
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0                   0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0                   0
<CHANGES>                                      0                   0
<NET-INCOME>                              (5,819)              (4,410)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0                   0


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 10.14**

 

**Amendment to the**

**Toys “R” Us, Inc. 2001 Stock Option and Performance Incentive Plan**

 

The Toys “R” Us, Inc. 2001 Stock Option and Performance Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended, effective as of March 16, 2004, as follows. 

 

1. The first sentence of Section 9.1 of the Plan, which reads as follows: 

 

“All unvested Options shall vest immediately on the date of a Change ofControl (as defined below), unless, in connection with the transaction, (i) such Options are to remain outstanding, (ii) such Options are assumed by the surviving corporation or its parent, or (iii) the surviving corporation or its parentsubstitutes the same terms for such Options.” 

 

shall be deleted in itsentirety and replaced with the following sentence: 

 

“Uponthe occurrence of a Change in Control (as defined below), all unvested Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, and other awards in the nature of rights that may be exercised shall vest, all restrictions on Restricted Shares and Restricted Units shalllapse, and any performance-based criteria for Performance Units or other awards shall be deemed to be satisfied at the greater of “target” or actual performance as of the date of the Change in Control, unless, in connection with suchtransaction, (i) such awards are to remain outstanding, (ii) such awards are assumed by the surviving corporation or its parent, or (iii) the surviving corporation or its parent substitutes awards with substantially the same terms for suchawards.” 

 

2. Section 9.2 of the Plan shall be deleted in its entirety andreplaced with the following: 

 

“**9.2 Officer’sEmployment.** In the event the employment of an officer of the Company is terminated (other than for cause), within the 12 months following a Change of Control: (a) all unvested Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, and other awards in the nature ofrights that may be exercised, shall vest immediately on the date of such termination and all such awards may be exercised until the earlier of (x) the thirty-month anniversary of the date of termination and (y) the expiration date of such awards;(b) all restrictions on Restricted Shares and Restricted Units shall lapse as of the date of such termination, and (c) any performance-based criteria for Performance Units or other awards shall be deemed to be satisfied at the greater of“target” or actual performance as of the date of such termination.” 

3. Except as specifically amended hereby, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect as prior to this Amendment.

 

The Corporation has caused this Amendment to be executed as of the day andyear first above written. 

 

- 2 -
**Exhibit 32.1**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE****OFFICER REGARDINGPERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING****FINANCIALSTATEMENTS**
     I, Carl E. Vogel, the Chief Executive Officer of CC V Holdings, LLC and CCV Holdings Finance, Inc. (collectively, the “Company”) in compliance with 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, hereby certify that, the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the three months ended March 31, 2004 (the “Report”) filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission:
 • fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 • the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. /s/ Carl E. VogelCarl E. VogelChief Executive OfficerMay 17, 2004
§ 68.4 Hearing aid-compatible telephones. ( a ) ( 1 ) Except for telephones used with public mobile services, telephones used with private radio services, and cordless and secure telephones, every telephone manufactured in the United States (other than for export) or imported for use in the United States after August 16, 1989, must be hearing aid compatible, as defined in § 68.316. Every cordless telephone manufactured in the United States (other than for export) or imported into the United States after August 16, 1991, must be hearing aid compatible, as defined in § 68.316.
( 2 ) Unless otherwise stated and except for telephones used with public mobile services, telephones used with private radio services and secure telephones, every telephone listed in § 68.112 must be hearing aid compatible, as defined in § 68.316.
( 3 ) A telephone is hearing aid-compatible if it provides internal means for effective use with hearing aids that are designed to be compatible with telephones which meet established technical standards for hearing aid compatibility.
( 4 ) The Commission shall revoke or otherwise limit the exemptions of paragraph (a)((1) of this section for telephones used with public mobile services or telephones used with private radio services if it determines that ( i ) such revocation or limitation is in the public interest;
( ii ) continuation of the exemption without such revocation or limitation would have an adverse effect on hearing-impaired individuals;
( iii ) compliance with the requirements of § 68.4(a)(1) is technologically feasible for the telephones to which the exemption applies; and
( iv ) compliance with the requirements of § 68.4(a)(1) would not increase costs to such an extent that the telephones to which the exemption applies could not be successfully marketed.
[54 FR 21430, May 18, 1989, as amended at 55 FR 28763, July 13, 1990; 57 FR 27183, June 18, 1992; 61 FR 42186, Aug. 14, 1996]
This memorandum opinion was not selected for pub lication in the New Mexico Reports. Please 1 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 2 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated 3 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does 4 not include the filing date. 5 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 6 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 7 Plaintiff-Appellee, 8
v. NO. 30,582 9 DONNA HARTE, a/k/a 10 DONNA LOPEZ-HOLLINGSHEAD, 11 Defendant-Appellant. 12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY 13 Stephen Bridgforth, District Judge 14 Gary K. King, Attorney General 15 Santa Fe, NM 16 for Appellee 17 The Law Offices of Nancy L. Simmons, P.C. 18 Nancy L. Simmons 19 Albuquerque, NM 20 for Appellant 21

MEMORANDUM OPINION 222 CASTILLO, Chief Judge. 1 Defendant Donna Harte appeals the district court’s orders revoking her 2 probation and imposing judgment and sentence. 3 On June 14, 2011, this Court filed a second notice of proposed summary 4 disposition, again proposing to affirm. OnJuly, 21, 2011, Defendant filed a second 5 memorandum in opposition, re-asserting the arguments set forth in her first 6 memorandum and suggesting in the alternativ e that the appeal be reassigned to the 7 general calendar. Having duly considered Defendant’s memoranda in opposition, we 8 affirm the district court for the reasons stated in our first and second notices of 9 proposed summary disposition. 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11

__________________________________ 12 CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Chief Judge 13 WE CONCUR: 14

__________________________________ 15 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge 16

__________________________________ 17 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge 18
Exhibit 32.01




Section 1350 Certification




In connection with this report of ML Trend-Following Futures Fund L.P. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Justin C. Ferri, Chief Executive Officer, President and Manager of Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC, the general partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.  This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










Date:  January 27, 2012











By  /s/ Justin C. Ferri


Justin C. Ferri


Chief Executive Officer, President and Manager


(Principal Executive Officer)
#### § 64.4006 Limitations on use of customer account information.

A carrier that receives customer account information under this section shall use such information to ensure timely and accurate billing of a customer's account and to ensure timely and accurate execution of a customer's preferred interexchange carrier instructions. Such information shall not be used for marketing purposes without the express consent of the customer.
---

EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 United States Code §
1350As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

The undersigned hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form
20-F for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2016 of PolyMet Mining Corp. (the
Company) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

|Date: April 21, 2016 | /s/
      Jonathan Cherry                                
|-------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------
|                     | Name: Jonathan Cherry                                    
|                     | Title: Chief Executive Officer (Principal
      Executive
|                     | Officer)                                                 

|Date: April 21, 2016 | /s/
      Douglas Newby                                           
|-------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     | Name: Douglas Newby                                               
|                     | Title: Chief Financial Officer (Principal
      Financial Officer)

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Curtis J. Parker, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
Cotelligent, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Cotelligent, Inc.

Date: March 28, 2003        By: /s/ Curtis J. Parker
                            ----------------------------------
                            Curtis J. Parker
                            Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-15-00154- CR

F rank Hend erson Brown, Ap pellant

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 147 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -DC- 14- 2009 98, H ONO RAB LE CLIF F ORD A. B ROW N, JUDGE P RESIDING
O R D E R
P ER CURIAM

T h e repor ter’s rec ord in this cause was orig inally due April 5, 2015. On t h e co u rt repor t er ’s reque sts, the deadline for filing the repor ter’s rec ord was extended to October 23. The repor ter has now submitt ed a fourth reque st asking that the Court extend the time for filing the
re p o rt er’s rec ord t o November 30. We g rant court repor ter Kimberly L ee’ s reque st and or d er h er to file the repor

ter’s rec ord no later than November 30. No further extensions will be g rante d, and failure to comply with this order will result i n Ms. L ee bei n g re q u i red to appea r before this Court and show c ause w hy

she should not be held in contempt and ha ve sanc tions im posed. I t is so ordered N ovember 6, 2015.

Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Goodwin, and B ourland Do Not Publish
# Welcome to Second Group of CIO LDP Students

/ Published Jan. 7, 2016
The NDU iCollege is happy to welcome 14 students from multiple U.S. Federal Government agencies, including DoD and others, and from four international agencies including Algeria, Burundi, South Korea, and Morocco.  This cohort of students will study the Chief Information Officer Leadership Development Program (CIO LDP) curriculum for the next 14 weeks at NDU.This program combines a highly interactive, student-centered learning experience with education on CIO competencies, leadership skills, teambuilding, domestic field studies, and more.  More information on the CIO LDP can be found on our website, Academics page.  Dates for the fall 2016 CIO LDP will be announced soon.   Please contact the CIO LDP Director at russell.quirici@ndu.edu for more details on how to apply.
§ 73.3513 Signing of applications. ( a ) Applications, amendments thereto, and related statements of fact required by the FCC must be signed by the following persons: ( 1 ) *Individual Applicant.* The applicant, if the applicant is an individual.
( 2 ) *Partnership.* One of the partners, if the applicant is a partnership.
( 3 ) *Corporation.* An officer, if the applicant is a corporation.
( 4 ) *Unincorporated Association.* A member who is an officer, if the applicant is an unincorporated association.
( 5 ) *Governmental Entity.* Such duly elected or appointed officials as may be competent to do so under the law of the applicable jurisdiction, if the applicant is an eligible governmental entity, such as a State or Territory of the United States and political subdivisions thereof, the District of Columbia, and a unit of local government, including an unincorporated municipality.
( b ) Applications, amendments thereto, and related statements of fact required by the FCC may be signed by the applicant's attorney in case of the applicant's physical disability or of his absence from the United States. The attorney shall in that event separately set forth the reason why the application is not signed by the applicant. In addition, if any matter is stated on the basis of the attorney's belief only (rather than his knowledge), he shall separately set forth his reasons for believing that such statements are true.
( c ) Facsimile signatures are acceptable. Only the original of applications, amendments, or related statements of fact, need be signed; copies may be conformed.
( d ) Applications, amendments, and related statements of fact need not be submitted under oath. Willful false statements made therein however, will be considered a violation of § 73.1015, are also punishable by fine and imprisonment, U.S. Code, Title 18, section 1001, and by appropriate adminstrative sanctions including revocation of station license pursuant to section 312(a)(i) of the Communications Act.
[44 FR 38487, July 2, 1979, as amended at 51 FR 3069, Jan. 23, 1986; 64 FR 56978, Oct. 22, 1999]
Exhibit 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below
constitutes and appoints John H. Eyler, Jr., Louis Lipschitz and Christopher K.
Kay and each of them, his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents,
with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or
her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Toys "R" Us, Inc. for the fiscal year ended February 1, 2003,
and any amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and
other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them,
full power and authority to do and perform such and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done, as fully to all intents and purposes as he
or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that
said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or his or her substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

This Power of Attorney may be executed in separate counterparts, each of which
shall be an original, but all such counterparts shall together constitute one
and the same instrument.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this Power of
Attorney as of the 4th day of March, 2003.

Name                    Title                             Signature
----                    -----                             ---------

John H. Eyler           Chairman of the Board,            /s/ John H. Eyler
                        President and
                        Chief Executive Officer

RoAnn Costin            Director                          /s/ RoAnn Costin

Roger N. Farah          Director                          /s/ Roger N. Farah

Peter A. Georgescu      Director                          /s/ Peter A. Georgescu

Michael Goldstein       Director                          /s/ Michael Goldstein

Calvin Hill             Director                          /s/ Calvin Hill

Nancy Karch             Director                          /s/ Nancy Karch

Charles Lazarus         Director, Chairman Emeritus       /s/ Charles Lazarus

Norman S. Matthews      Director                          /s/ Norman S. Matthews

Arthur B. Newman        Director                          /s/ Arthur B. Newman
§ 80.1081 Functional requirements. Ships, while at sea, must be capable: ( a ) Except as provided in §§ 80.1087(a)(1) and 80.1091(a)(4)(iii), of transmitting ship-to-shore distress alerts by at least two separate and independent means, each using a different radiocommunication service;
( b ) Of receiving shore-to-ship distress alerts;
( c ) Of transmitting and receiving ship-to-ship distress alerts;
( d ) Of transmitting and receiving search and rescue co-ordinating communications;
( e ) Of transmitting and receiving on-scene communications;
( f ) Of transmitting and receiving signals for locating;
( g ) Of transmitting and receiving maritime safety information;
( h ) Of transmitting and receiving general radiocommunications to and from shore-based radio sytsems or networks; and
( i ) Of transmitting and receiving bridge-to-bridge communications.
§ 69.305 Carrier cable and wire facilities (C&WF). ( a ) Carrier C&WF that is not used for “origination” or “termination” as defined in § 69.2(bb) and § 69.2(cc) shall be assigned to the interexchange category.
( b ) Carrier C&WF, other than WATS access lines, not assigned pursuant to paragraph (a), (c), or (e) of this section that is used for interexchange services that use switching facilities for origination and termination that are also used for local exchange telephone service shall be apportioned to the local Transport elements.
( c ) Carrier C&WF that is used to provide transmission between the local exchange carrier's signalling transfer point and the database shall be assigned to the Line Information Database sub-element at § 69.120(a).
( d ) All Carrier C&WF that is not apportioned pursuant to paragraphs (a), (b), (c), and (e) of this section shall be assigned to the Special Access element.
( e ) Carrier C&WF that is used to provide transmission between the local exchange carrier's signalling transfer point and the local switch shall be assigned to the local switching category.
[52 FR 37312, Oct. 6, 1987, as amended at 57 FR 24380, June 9, 1992; 58 FR 30995, May 28, 1993; 62 FR 31938, June 11, 1997]
No. 11-8878.

#### Carter *v.*Sisto, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
§ 5.73 Experimental report. ( a ) The following provisions apply to conventional experimental radio licenses and to medical testing experimental licenses that operate under part 15, Radio Frequency Devices; part 18, Industrial, Scientific, and Medical Equipment, part 95, Personal Radio Services subpart H—Wireless Medical Telemetry Service; or part 95, subpart I—Medical Device Radiocommunication Service: ( 1 ) The Commission may, as a condition of authorization, request that the licensee forward periodic reports in order to evaluate the progress of the experimental program.
( 2 ) An applicant may request that the Commission withhold from the public certain reports and associated material and the Commission will do so unless the public interest requires otherwise. These requests should follow the procedures for submission set forth in § 0.459 of this chapter.
( b ) The provisions in § 5.207 apply to broadcast experimental radio licenses.
( c ) The provisions in § 5.309 apply to program experimental licenses and to medical testing experimental licenses that do not operate under part 15, Radio Frequency Devices; part 18, Industrial, Scientific, and Medical Equipment, part 95, Personal Radio Services subpart H—Wireless Medical Telemetry Service; or part 95, subpart I—Medical Device Radiocommunication Service.
[78 FR 25162, Apr. 29, 2013]