alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 05-0613 

Post-Focus Draft Revision 2 4/2/2009 

ENGINEER: H LH

PV (kg/yr): 

Revision Notes / Assessment Overview: 

 

SUBMITTER: . 

USE: 

OTHER USES: 

SDS: Yes Label: No 

Respirator: 

ealth Effects: 

CRSS (06/27/2005): 

C

S-H20: 

VP: 

MW: 

Consumer Use: 

SAT (concerns) (06/28/2005): 

Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: 

Migration to groundwater: Moderate 

PBT rating: P1B1T2 . 

Health: 1-2 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation, 

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 5
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3B 

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: 

Generated by the 05/27/2004 version of ChemSTEER. 

 

 

 

REVENTION CONSIDERATIONS: 

. 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 5
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 05-0613 

Use 

Number of Sites/ Location: 

Location 

Days/yr: 

Basis: 

Process Description: 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY 

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below 

may coincide with daily releases from the other sources 

to the same medium. 

Output 2: 

to: 

from: 

basis: 

 

 

Output 2: 

 

from: 

basis: 

Output 2: 

 

basis: 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 5
RELEASE TOTAL 

 kg/yr - all sites 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY 

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 

Basis: 

Inhalation: 

Exposure to 

Upper Bound: 

Number of work ith i ion exposure: 

Basis: 

INHALATION MONITORING DATA REVIEW 

1) Uncertainty (estimate based on model, regulato 

 or data not specific to industry): 

2)a) Exposure level > 1 mg/day? 

 OR 

 b) Hazard Rating for health of 2 or

Inhalation Monitoring Data Desired? 

met) 

Exposure to 

Low End of Range: 

High End of Range:

Number o

Basis: 

INHALATION MONITORING DATA REVIEW 

1) Uncertainty (estimate based on model, regulatory limit 

 or data not specific to industry): 

2)a) Exposure level > 1 mg/day? 

 OR 

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 5
 b) Hazard Rating for health of 2 or

Inhalation Monitoring Data Desired? 

met) 

Dermal: 

Exposure t con ion 

High End: 

Number of ) wi al exposure: 

Basis: 

Exposure t con ion 

High End: 

Number of ) wi al exposure: 

Basis: 

CALL BY: 

Organization: 

CALL TO: 

Organization: 

Date: 

Time: 

Phone: 

- 

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 5
<PAGE>   1



                                  Exhibit 23.1

                             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


SCB Computer Technology, Inc.
Memphis, Tennessee

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-1590, Form S-8 No. 333-36971 and Form S-8 No.
333-68343), of our report dated August 11, 2000, relating to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of SCB Computer Technology, Inc. appearing in
the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2000 .


Atlanta, Georgia
August 14, 2000
#### § 73.4017 Application processing: Commercial FM stations.

See §§ 73.5000 through 73.5009.

[89 FR 7262, Feb. 1, 2024]
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the
undersigned certifies that this periodic report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of IKONICS
Corporation.


Date: August 11, 2006                   /s/ William C. Ulland
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        William C. Ulland
                                        Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and
                                        President


Date: August 11, 2006                   /s/ Jon Gerlach
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Jon Gerlach
                                        Chief Financial Officer and Vice
                                        President of Finance
§ 76.963 Forfeiture. ( a ) If any cable operator willfully fails to comply with the terms of any Commission order, including an order mandating remedial requirements after a finding of unreasonable cable programming service or equipment rates, or any Commission rule, the Commission may, in addition to other remedies, impose a forfeiture pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 503(b).
( b ) A cable operator shall not be subject to forfeiture because its rate for cable programming service or equipment is determined to be unreasonable.
§ 27.1102 Designated Entities in the 1710-1755 MHz and 2110-2155 MHz bands. ( a ) *Eligibility for small business provisions.* ( 1 ) A small business is an entity that, together with its affiliates, its controlling interests and the affiliates of its controlling interests, has average gross revenues that are not more than $40 million for the preceding three years.
( 2 ) A very small business is an entity that, together with its affiliates, its controlling interests and the affiliates of its controlling interests, has average gross revenues that are not more than $15 million for the preceding three years.
( b ) *Bidding credits.* ( 1 ) A winning bidder that qualifies as a small business, as defined in this section, or a consortium of small businesses may use a bidding credit of 15 percent, as specified in § 1.2110(f)(2)(iii) of this chapter, to lower the cost of its winning bid on any of the licenses in this part.
( 2 ) A winning bidder that qualifies as a very small business, as defined in this section, or a consortium of very small businesses may use a bidding credit of 25 percent, as specified in § 1.2110(f)(2)(ii) of this chapter, to lower the cost of its winning bid on any of the licenses in this part.
235P15

#### Jimmy L. and Angela M. Allen v. Travelers Insurance Company

Pits’ *Pro Se*Motion for PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-427)

Denied
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00400-CR

SCOTT SAMUEL MEYER

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

207th District Court of Comal County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CR2012-431

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

May 8, 2014
# Dr. Gerry Gingrich Publishes Article on Government Centralization in Federal Times

/ Published Sept. 29, 2014

To Centralize or Decentralize? The debate on whether to centralize or decentralize our federal IT systems is as hot as ever – even after 50 years or more. Frankly, I don’t think the debate will ever end, as there is no simple organizational system for IT except in the case of small organizations. And in the federal sector, we don’t do small.

So what is the answer? Click HERE for entire article.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-51047 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus OSCAR RENE PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-01-CR-951-ALL-DB

-------------------- April 11, 2002 Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Oscar Rene Perez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of attempting to illegally reenter the United States after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that the sentence is invalid because it exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment prescribed in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Perez complains that his sentence was improperly enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) based on his prior deportation following an aggravated felony conviction. He argues that the sentencing provision violates the Due Process Clause.No. 01-51047 -2- Alternatively, Perez contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) define separate offenses. He argues that the aggravated felony conviction that resulted in his increased sentence was an element of the offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) that should have been alleged in his indictment.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Perez acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his arguments for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 531 U.S. 1202 (2001). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4701 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4701

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to deem certain service in the 
organized military forces of the Government of the Commonwealth of the 
 Philippines and the Philippine Scouts to have been active service for 
 purposes of benefits under programs administered by the Secretary of 
                           Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 30, 1994

 Mr. Filner (for himself and Mr. Evans) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to deem certain service in the 
organized military forces of the Government of the Commonwealth of the 
 Philippines and the Philippine Scouts to have been active service for 
 purposes of benefits under programs administered by the Secretary of 
                           Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Filipino Veterans Equity Act of 
1994''.

SEC. 2. CERTAIN SERVICE IN THE ORGANIZED MILITARY FORCES OF THE 
              PHILIPPINES DEEMED TO BE ACTIVE SERVICE.

    (a) In General.--Section 107 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``not'' after ``Army of the United 
                States, shall''; and
                    (B) by striking ``, except benefits un- der--'' and 
                all that follows and inserting a period; and
            (2) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) by striking ``not'' after ``Armed Forces 
                Voluntary Recruitment Act of 1945 shall''; and
                    (B) by striking ``except--'' and all that follows 
                and inserting a period.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Heading.--The heading of such section is amended to 
        read as follows:
``Sec. 107. Certain service in organized military forces of the 
              Philippines deemed to be active service''.
            (2) Clerical amendment.--The item relating to such section 
        in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 1 of such 
        title is amended to read as follows:

``107. Certain service in organized military forces of the Philippines 
                            deemed to be active service.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    (a) In General.--The amendments made by this Act shall take effect 
on October 1, 1994.
    (b) Applicability.--No benefits shall accrue to any person for any 
period before the effective date of this Act by reason of the 
amendments made by this Act.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00475-CR

Paul William Provence

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From County Criminal Court No. 6

of Tarrant County (1254463)

July 2, 2015

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Terrie Livingston

 Chief Justice Terrie Livingston
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Immunicon Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edward L. Erickson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|                                          
|/s/    EDWARD L.
ERICKSON                 
|Edward L. Erickson Chief Executive Officer



November 11, 2005
NOTE: An active TS-SCI clearance is required for this program. http://cic.ndu.edu

JOINT PROFESSIONAL MILITARY EDUCATION

Mission: Prepare joint warfighters to be strategic leaders through a joint senior level course of study in the use 

of the Information instrument of power and Cyberspace domain. 

The College of Information and Cyberspace’s (CIC) JPME curriculum focuses on the information 

instrument of power and cyberspace. It provides graduate-level education to senior military and civilian 

leaders with an emphasis on the military, government, and private sector dimensions of information and 

cyberspace as a critical component of national security strategy. 

Qualified graduates are awarded a Master of 

Science in Strategic Information and 

Cyberspace Studies

Student Criteria: 

Students for the CIC JPME II program are nominated 

by their service or agency. Self-nomination or 

applications are not accepted. Senior Service College 

(SSC) nominees must be in the grade of O-5 or O-6 

who have already received credit for completing a 

CJCS-accredited program of JPME Phase I or received 

equivalent JPME Phase I credit as articulated in CJCSI 

1800.01E. The desired mix of seminar students 

includes military officers from all three Military 

Departments, the U.S. Coast Guard, international 

officers, DoD civilians, Federal Agency civilians, and 

private sector civilians. The curriculum is designed for 

students who currently serve in, have an interest in, or 

may have the need to develop strategy with those who 

serve in the information/cyberspace domain. A 

successful student does not need technical expertise but

must possess the intellectual curiosity that makes them 

receptive to new ideas and new approaches to 

understanding national security.

Successful Strategic Information and Cyberspace 

Studies graduates will be able to: 

• Evaluate the national security environment 

with a focus on the informational instrument of 

power and cyberspace.

• Create information strategic and policy options 

that support joint warfighting and achieve 

national security objectives.

• Create cyber strategic and policy options that 

support joint warfighting and achieve national 

security objectives.

• Evaluate principles of the profession of arms, 

civil-military relations, and ethics to support 

strategic-level decision-making.

• Demonstrate strategic leadership to 

include effective communication and 

creative and critical thinking in a joint, 

interagency, and multinational 

environment.
No. 11-217.

#### Dawes et ux. *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
#### Mrs. Cleo Sleigh, *Petitioner,*vs. State of Florida, *Defendant.*

143 So. 220.

En Banc.

Decision filed July 21, 1932.

*W. W. Flournoy,*for Petitioner;

*Cary D. Landis,*Attorney General, and *Boy Campbell,*Assistant, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Circuit Court here on review on writ of certiorari should be quashed on authority of the opinion and judgment in the case of Willie Cooper vs. State of Florida, filed this day, and it is so ordered.

Judgment quashed.

*262Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.

Ellis, J., dissents.
§ 64.6203 Definitions. For purposes of this subpart, the following definitions shall apply: ( a ) *Covered Services.* Telecommunications service, Internet access service, and advanced communications services, including interexchange services and advanced telecommunications and information services.
( b ) *Equipment.* Hardware, software, and applications, whether separate or in combination, mainstream or specialized, needed by an individual who is deaf-blind to achieve access to Covered Services.
( c ) *Individual who is deaf-blind.* ( 1 ) Any individual: ( i ) Who has a central visual acuity of 20/200 or less in the better eye with corrective lenses, or a field defect such that the peripheral diameter of visual field subtends an angular distance no greater than 20 degrees, or a progressive visual loss having a prognosis leading to one or both these conditions;
( ii ) Who has a chronic hearing impairment so severe that most speech cannot be understood with optimum amplification, or a progressive hearing loss having a prognosis leading to this condition; and
( iii ) For whom the combination of impairments described in paragraphs (c)(1)(i) and (ii) of this section cause extreme difficulty in attaining independence in daily life activities, achieving psychosocial adjustment, or obtaining a vocation.
( 2 ) An individual's functional abilities with respect to using Covered Services in various environments shall be considered when determining whether the individual is deaf-blind under paragraphs (c)(1)(ii) and (iii) of this section.
( 3 ) The definition in this paragraph (c) also includes any individual who, despite the inability to be measured accurately for hearing and vision loss due to cognitive or behavioral constraints, or both, can be determined through functional and performance assessment to have severe hearing and visual disabilities that cause extreme difficulty in attaining independence in daily life activities, achieving psychosocial adjustment, or obtaining vocational objectives.
( d ) *Specialized customer premises equipment* means equipment employed on the premises of a person, which is commonly used by individuals with disabilities to achieve access to Covered Services.
( e ) *TRS Fund Administrator.* The entity selected by the Commission to administer the Interstate Telecommunications Relay Service Fund (TRS Fund) established pursuant to subpart F.
#### § 302-5.16 May I receive an advance of funds for househunting trip expenses?

Your agency may authorize an advance of funds, in accordance with §§ 302-2.23, 302-2.24, and 302-2.25 of this chapter, for your househunting trip expenses. Your agency may not advance you funds in excess of the sum of your anticipated transportation costs and either the maximum per diem allowable under part 302-4 of this chapter for the location and duration of your househunting trip or your lump sum househunting trip subsistence expenses payment, whichever applies.

[FTR Amdt. 98, 66 FR 58196, Nov. 20, 2001, as amended by FTR Amdt. 2011-01, 76 FR 18337, Apr. 1, 2011; FTR Amdt. 2014-01, 79 FR 49645, Aug. 21, 2014]
244A15

#### State v. Tanisha Decole Belcher

Def’s Notice of Appeal Based Upon *í*Constitutional Question (COA15-31)

Dismissed *ex mero motu*
#### § 32.6510 Other property, plant and equipment expenses.

Companies shall use this account for expenses of the type and character detailed in Accounts 6511 and 6512.

[82 FR 20842, May 4, 2017]
#### § 76.801 Scope.

The provisions of this subpart set forth rules and regulations for the disposition, after a subscriber voluntarily terminates cable service, of that cable home wiring installed by the cable system operator or its contractor within the premises of the subscriber. The provisions do not apply where the cable home wiring belongs to the subscriber, such as where the operator has transferred ownership to the subscriber, the operator has been treating the wiring as belonging to the subscriber for tax purposes, or the wiring is considered to be a fixture by state or local law in the subscriber's jurisdiction. Nothing in this subpart shall affect the cable system operator's rights and responsibilities under § 76.617 to prevent excessive signal leakage while providing cable service, or the cable operator's right to access the subscriber's property or premises.

[58 FR 11971, Mar. 2, 1993]
§ 73.1210 TV/FM dual-language broadcasting in Puerto Rico. ( a ) For the purpose of this section, dual-language broadcasting shall be understood to mean the telecasting of a program in one language with the simultaneous transmission, on the main channel of a participating FM broadcast station, of companion sound track information in a different language.
( b ) Television and Class A television licensees in Puerto Rico may enter into dual-language time purchase agreements with FM broadcast licensees, subject to the following conditions: ( 1 ) All such agreements shall be reduced to writing and retained by the licensee for possible Commission inspection, in accordance with § 73.3613 of this chapter.
( 2 ) All such agreements shall specify that the FM licensee will monitor sound track material with a view to rejecting any material deemed to be inappropriate or objectionable for broadcast exposure.
( 3 ) No television, Class A television, or FM broadcast station may devote more than 15 hours per week to dual-language broadcasting, nor may more than three (3) hours of such programming be presented on any given day.
( 4 ) Noncommercial educational television broadcast stations shall take all necessary precautions to assure that the entire operation is conducted on a noncommercial basis and otherwise in accordance with § 73.621 of this part.
[40 FR 17259, Apr. 18, 1975, as amended at 49 FR 33663, Aug. 24, 1984; 50 FR 40016, Oct. 1, 1985; 65 FR 30003, May 10, 2000]
No. 11-5379.

#### Weeks *v.*United States.

C. A- Uth Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### § 27.1132 Protection of incumbent operations in the 2150-2160/62 MHz band.

All AWS licensees, prior to initiating operations from any base or fixed station in the 2110-2180 MHz band, shall follow the provisions of § 27.1255.

[79 FR 32414, June 4, 2014]