alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          1,265,613,000
<SECURITIES>                                      302,197,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                     394,962,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (72,486,000)
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   78,790,000
<PP&E>                                          6,239,098,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (754,915,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 11,027,317,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           1,029,751,000
<BONDS>                                         7,482,814,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             137,175,000
<PREFERRED>                                            15,000
<COMMON>                                            1,054,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      2,286,934,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   11,027,317,000
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                1,090,693,000
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     536,215,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  440,264,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                485,212,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (856,972,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (856,972,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (856,972,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (9.83)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (9.83)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Annual Report of Celadon Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen Russell, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  September 4, 2009
/s/Stephen RussellStephen Russell
Chief Executive Officer







Back to Form 10-K
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Lawrence H. Hayward, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Leslies Poolmart, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 27, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Leslies Poolmart, Inc.

Dated: December 22, 2008



By:

/s/ Lawrence H. HaywardName:

Lawrence H. HaywardTitle:

Chief Executive Officer


I, Steven L. Ortega, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Leslies Poolmart, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 27, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Leslies Poolmart, Inc.

Dated: December 22, 2008



By:

/s/ Steven L. OrtegaName:

Steven L. OrtegaTitle:

Executive Vice-President andChief Financial Officer
No. 11-9944.

#### Striley *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 10-10868.

#### Richards *v.*Hinkle, Warden.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 80.1019 Antenna radio frequency indicator.

Each nonportable bridge-to-bridge transmitter must be equipped, at each point of control, with a carrier operated device which will provide continuous visual indication when the transmitter is supplying power to the antenna transmission line or, in lieu thereof, a pilot lamp or meter which will provide continuous visual indication when the transmitter control circuits have been placed in a condition to activate the transmitter.

[52 FR 35246, Sept. 18, 1987]
No. 11-9623.

#### Madeira *v.*Pennsylvania.

Super. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.
§ 69.304 Subscriber line cable and wire facilities. ( a ) Investment in local exchange subscriber lines shall be assigned to the Common Line element.
( b ) Investment in interstate and foreign private lines and interstate WATS access lines shall be assigned to the Special access element.
[52 FR 37312, Oct. 6, 1987, as amended at 62 FR 31938, June 11, 1997]
§ 76.1909 Redistribution control of unencrypted digital terrestrial broadcast content. ( a ) For the purposes of this section, the terms unencrypted digital terrestrial broadcast content, EIT, PMT, broadcast flag, covered demodulator product, and marked content shall have the same meaning as set forth in § 73.9000 of this chapter.
( b ) *Encrypted retransmission.* Where a multichannel video programming distributor retransmits unencrypted digital terrestrial broadcast content in encrypted form, such distributor shall, upon demodulation of the 8-VSB, 16-VSB, 64-QAM or 256-QAM signal, inspect either the EIT or PMT for the broadcast flag, and if the broadcast flag is present: ( 1 ) Securely and robustly convey that information to the consumer product used to decrypt the distributor's signal information, and
( 2 ) Require that such consumer product, following such decryption, protect the content of such signal as if it were a covered demodulator product receiving marked content.
( c ) *Unencrypted retransmission.* Where a multichannel video programming distributor retransmits unencrypted digital terrestrial broadcast content in unencrypted form, such distributor shall, upon demodulation: ( 1 ) Preserve the broadcast flag, if present, in both the EIT and PMT; and
( 2 ) Use 8-VSB, 16-VSB, 64-QAM, or 256-QAM signal modulation for the retransmission.
( d ) *Unmarked content.* Where a multichannel video programming distributor retransmits unencrypted digital terrestrial broadcast content that is not marked with the broadcast flag, the multichannel video programming distributor shall not encode such content to restrict its redistribution.
[68 FR 67607, Dec. 3, 2003]
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4827

To prohibit acquisitions of land or waters for the National Wildlife Refuge

System if wildlife refuge revenue sharing payments have not been made

for the preceding fiscal year.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 25, 1994

Mr. SENSENBRENNER introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly

to the Committees on Merchants Marine and Fisheries and Natural Resources

A BILL

To prohibit acquisitions of land or waters for the National

Wildlife Refuge System if wildlife refuge revenue sharing

payments have not been made for the preceding fiscal

year.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON ACQUISITIONS FOR NATIONAL

4 WILDLIFE REFUGE SYSTEM.

5 (a) LIMITATION.—No amounts may be expended by

6 the United States in a fiscal year for acquisition of land

7 or waters (or interests therein) for the National Wildlife

8 Refuge System if the Secretary of the Interior has not
2

•HR 4827 IH

1 made all payments required for the preceding fiscal year

2 by section 401(c)(1) of the Act of June 15, 1935 (16

3 U.S.C. 715s(c)(1)).

4 (b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—A provision of law

5 enacted after the date of the enactment of this Act shall

6 not be considered to amend, repeal, or otherwise modify

7 or supersede subsection (a) unless the provision expressly

8 refers to subsection (a).

9 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT TO LAND AND WATER

10 CONSERVATION FUND ACT OF 1965.—Subsection (b) of

11 section 7 of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act

12 of 1965 (16 U.S.C. 460l–9(b)) is amended to read as

13 follows:

14 ‘‘(b) ACQUISITION RESTRICTIONS.—

15 ‘‘(1) USE FOR AUTHORIZED ACQUISITIONS.—

16 Appropriations from the fund pursuant to this sec17 tion shall not be used for acquisition unless such ac18 quisition is otherwise authorized by law: Provided,

19 however, That appropriations from the fund may be

20 used for preacquisition work in instances where au21 thorization is imminent and where substantial mone22 tary savings could be realized.

23 ‘‘(2) USE FOR WILDLIFE REFUGE ACQUISI24 TIONS.—Appropriations from the fund pursuant to

25 this Act shall not be used in a fiscal year for acquisi-
3

•HR 4827 IH

1 tion of land or waters (or interests therein) for the

2 National Wildlife Refuge System if the Secretary

3 has not made all payments required for the preced4 ing fiscal year by section 401(c)(1) of the Act of

5 June 15, 1935 (16 U.S.C. 715s(c)(1)).’’.

6 SEC. 2. APPLICATION.

7 Section 1 shall not apply to any acquisition the Sec8 retary of the Interior is obligated to carry out under a

9 contract entered into by the Secretary of the Interior on

10 or before the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
§ 73.1217 Broadcast hoaxes. ( a ) No licensee or permittee of any broadcast station shall broadcast false information concerning a crime or a catastrophe if: ( 1 ) The licensee knows this information is false;
( 2 ) It is foreseeable that broadcast of the information will cause substantial public harm, and
( 3 ) Broadcast of the information does in fact directly cause substantial public harm.
( b ) Any programming accompanied by a disclaimer will be presumed not to pose foreseeable harm if the disclaimer clearly characterizes the program as a fiction and is presented in a way that is reasonable under the circumstances.
( c ) For purposes of this rule, “public harm” must begin immediately, and cause direct and actual damage to property or to the health or safety of the general public, or diversion of law enforcement or other public health and safety authorities from their duties. The public harm will be deemed foreseeable if the licensee could expect with a significant degree of certainty that public harm would occur. A “crime” is any act or omission that makes the offender subject to criminal punishment by law. A “catastrophe” is a disaster or imminent disaster involving violent or sudden event affecting the public.
[89 FR 7254, Feb. 1, 2024]
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Edward L. Erickson, Chief Executive Officer ofImmunicon Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify, that:

 

(1) The Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q forthe quarterly period ended March 31, 2004, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to thequarterly report on Form 10-Q/A (collectively, the “Report”), fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Edward  L. Erickson  |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Edward L. Erickson       |
| Chief  Executive Officer |
| June 16,  2004           |

 

----
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: April 7, 2015

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: EPA Region 1

SUBJECT: April 6, 2015, Overview of Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants

for Harvard Law School’s American Constitution Society

SUMMARY

On April 6, 2015, Regional Administrator Curt Spalding spoke to a group of students 

from Harvard Law School’s American Constitution Society about the proposed Clean Power 

Plan. 

ATTENDEES

EPA: 

Curt Spalding

Emily Bender

Shutsu Wong

Harvard Law School: 

Paul Suitter

Approximately 15 people attended this conference. Attendance was not taken by EPA
§ 73.510 Antenna systems. ( a ) All noncommercial educational stations operating with more than 10 watts transmitter output power shall be subject to the provisions of § 73.316 concerning antenna systems contained in subpart B of this part.
( b ) *Directional antenna.* No application for a construction permit of a new station, or change in channel, or change in an existing facility on the same channel will be accepted for filing if a directional antenna with a maximum-to-minimum ratio of more than 15 dB is proposed.
[42 FR 36829, July 18, 1977]
No. 11-8970.

#### Curry *v.*Uribe, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Schedule of 2007 Performance Stock Unit Awards



 EXHIBIT 10.3(a)-5 
 Schedule of 2007 Performance Stock Unit Awards 
 to certain named executive officers 

 

			
	 Name / Title
	  	Number of Stock Units Awarded
	 Neil S. Novich
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
	  	102,000
		
	 Jay M. Gratz
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and
President—Ryerson
Coil Processing Division
	  	37,000
		
	 Gary J. Niederpruem
Executive Vice President
	  	37,000
		
	 Stephen E. Makarewicz
President—Ryerson South
	  	15,000
		
	 James M. Delaney
President—Global Accounts Division
	  	11,000
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM [IDENTIFY SPECIFIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS] AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      30,850,395
<SECURITIES>                                   763,644
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,538,461
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 14,338,442
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              73,095,168
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        77,436
<OTHER-SE>                                  63,366,263
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                73,095,168
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             (708,011)
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            11,460,774
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,401,630
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (15,214,473)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        399,679,423
<DISCONTINUED>                               (500,037)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            416,094,747
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               399,179,386
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25

<FN>
<F1>
(1)   The Company makes use of an unclassified balance sheet style due to the
      nature of its business. Current assets and current liabilities are
      therefore reflected as zero in accordance with the instructions of
      Appendix E to the Edgar flier manual.
</FN>

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.0




                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                      ----------------------------------

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of GA
Financial, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-37837) of our report dated January 22,
1998, except as to the information presented in Note 19, for which the date is
February 3, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of GA
Financial, Inc. as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and for the years ended
December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, which report is incorporated by reference in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



/s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND LLP

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
March 25, 1998
EPA Meeting with HCNA LLC

June 21, 2012

Attendees:

EPA OUST: 

Liz McDermott, Linda Gerber, Paul Miller, Tim Roberts, Erin Knighton, Tim Smith

HCNA LLC: Karl Overman

Alan Anderson and Associates: Alan Anderson

At this meeting EPA and HCNA discussed the proposed changes to the UST regulations. The 

discussion focused on airport hydrant systems and the capabilities of release detection on these 

types of systems.
Keene District Court

No. 81-419

#### Catherine LaPonsie *& a.*v. Stephen Kumorek

December 10, 1982

*1022
      *Catherine LaPonsie,*of Wilton, and *Randy Greene,*of Wilton, by brief, *pro se.*

The defendant filed no brief.

Per curiam.

The question in this case is whether a thirty-day notice to vacate requirement in a lease applies when the tenants vacate the premises at the expiration of the tenancy. We hold that it does not.

The plaintiffs entered into a written rental agreement for the period from December 12, 1980, to May 30, 1981, with rent payable in advance. The agreement contained the following provision: “This agreement may be terminated by a 30-day notice to vacate.” It was also stipulated that “[o]ne month’s rent held in reserve” would act as a security deposit.

The plaintiffs vacated the premises on May 30, 1981, without giving any notice. The defendant refused to return the one month’s rent being held because of the failure to give a thirty-day notice, and the plaintiffs brought suit. Trial was held in the District Court *{Harry C. Lichman,*Special Justice), which found for the defendant. We reverse and remand.

A lease is a contract whose terms are to be interpreted according to the rules of contract. *Turcotte v. Griffin,*120 N.H. 292, 294, 415 A.2d 668, 669 (1980). Generally, interpretation of a written instrument is an issue of law for this court ultimately to decide. *Murphy v. Doll-Mar, Inc.,*120 N.H. 610, 611, 419 A.2d 1106, 1108 (1980). Because the lease terminated by its own terms on May 30, 1981, the notice requirement which applied only to any earlier termination did not apply. There was no requirement that notice be given when the plaintiffs moved out when the tenancy terminated by its own terms. *See*Restatement (Second) of Property § 1.6, comment g, illustration 4 at 40 (1977).

The verdict is set aside, and judgment is to be entered for the plaintiffs.

*Reversed and remanded.*
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 150 (Friday, August 4, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 44549]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6673]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

48 CFR Chapter 1

[Docket FAR--2006-0023]


Federal Acquisition Regulation; Federal Acquisition Circular 
2005-12; Small Entity Compliance Guide

AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration 
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Small Entity Compliance Guide.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document is issued under the joint authority of the 
Secretary of Defense, the Administrator of General Services and the 
Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 
This Small Entity Compliance Guide has been prepared in accordance with 
Section 212 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act 
of 1996. It consists of a summary of rule appearing in Federal 
Acquisition Circular (FAC) 2005-12 which amends the FAR. An asterisk 
(*) next to a rule indicates that a regulatory flexibility analysis has 
been prepared. Interested parties may obtain further information 
regarding this rule by referring to FAC 2005-12 which precedes this 
document. These documents are also available via the Internet at http://acquisition.gov/far.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laurieann Duarte, FAR Secretariat, 
(202) 501-4225. For clarification of content, contact the analyst whose 
name appears in the table below.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Item                      Subject                        FAR case             Analyst
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I..........  Local Community Recovery Act of 2006       2006-014            Cundiff.
              (Interim).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Item I--Local Community Recovery Act of 2006 (Interim) (FAR Case 2006-
014)

    This interim rule adds a local area set-aside to the FAR for debris 
clearance, distribution of supplies, reconstruction, and other major 
disaster or emergency assistance activities. The contracting officer 
defines the set-aside area. The rule implements the Local Community 
Recovery Act of 2006, which strengthens the government's ability to 
promote local economic recovery. The local area set-aside does not 
replace small business set-asides. Both can be used at the same time. 
The rule imposes subcontracting restrictions when a local area set-
aside is used. No competition justification is required for the local 
area set-aside.

    Dated: July 28, 2006.
Ralph De Stefano,
Director, Contract Policy Division.
[FR Doc. 06-6673 Filed 8-3-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-S
Dismiss and Opinion Filed February 26, 2014.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-14-00211-CV

IN RE KENNETH HALL, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F09-71471-HPM

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices O'Neill, Lang, and Brown 

Opinion by Justice Lang

Before the Court is relator’s post-conviction petition for writ of habeas corpus 

complaining that he was convicted based on evidence obtained from an unlawful arrest and from 

an unconstitutional search and seizure and that he was denied assistance of counsel. The facts 

and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. This Court lacks 

jurisdiction over post-conviction writs of habeas corpus in felony cases. See TEX. CODE CRIM.

PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2010); In re Hampton, No. 05-07-00440-CV, 2007 WL 

1168446 at *1 (Tex. App.–Dallas Apr. 20, 2007, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). Accordingly, we 

DISMISS the petition for writ of habeas corpus. 

140211F.P05

/Douglas S. Lang/

DOUGLAS LANG

JUSTICE