alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4285

To prohibit States from discriminating in the admission to the practice

of law of graduates of accredited and certified law schools.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 21, 1994

Mr. MEEHAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To prohibit States from discriminating in the admission to

the practice of law of graduates of accredited and certified law schools.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

4 The Congress finds that—

5 (1) the vast majority of States only allow out6 of-State residents having gone to schools accredited

7 by the American Bar Association to sit for the Bar;

8 (2) many law school graduates are being re9 stricted in their admission to practice law because
2

•HR 4285 IH

1 they have elected to attend a school that is not so

2 accredited;

3 (3) each State requires bar applicants to pass

4 its individual exam of minimum competency before

5 the applicants can practice law within its boarders;

6 and

7 (4) States should rely on such exams, not arbi8 trary distinctions in State accrediting and certifying

9 procedures, to distinguish between qualified and un10 qualified candidates for admission.

11 SEC. 2. STATE RESTRICTIONS ON ADMISSIONS TO PRAC12 TICE OF LAW.

13 No State shall discriminate in the admission of indi14 viduals to the practice of law on the basis of whether such

15 individuals successfully completed a program of post-bac16 calaureate legal education of a law school that—

17 (1) is approved by the accrediting or certifying

18 agency of the State in which the law school is

19 located,

20 (2) is approved by an educational accrediting

21 agency recognized by the State in which the law

22 school is located, or

23 (3) is approved by the American Bar Associa24 tion.

Æ
§ 73.788 Service; commercial or sponsored programs. ( a ) A licensee of an international broadcast station shall render only an international broadcast service which will reflect the culture of this country and which will promote international goodwill, understanding, and cooperation. Any program solely intended for and directed to an audience in the continental United States does not meet the requirements for this service.
( b ) Such international broadcast service may include commercial or sponsored programs: *Provided,* That: ( 1 ) Commercial program continuities give no more than the name of the sponsor of the program and the name and general character of the commodity, utility or service, or attraction advertised.
( 2 ) In case of advertising a commodity, the commodity is regularly sold or is being promoted for sale on the open market in the foreign country or countries to which the program is directed in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section.
( 3 ) In case of advertising an American utility or service to prospective tourists or visitors to the United States, the advertisement continuity is particularly directed to such persons in the foreign country or countries where they reside and to which the program is directed in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section.
( 4 ) In case of advertising an international attraction (such as a world fair, resort, spa, etc.) to prospective tourists or visitors to the United States, the oral continuity concerning such attraction is consistent with the purpose and intent of this section.
( 5 ) In case of any other type of advertising, such advertising is directed to the foreign country or countries to which the program is directed and is consistent with the purpose and intent of this section.
( c ) The geographic areas to be served by international broadcasting stations are the zones and areas of reception shown in § 73.703.
( d ) An international broadcast station may transmit the program of a AM broadcast station or network system: *Provided,* That the conditions in paragraph (b) of this section as to any commercial continuities are observed and when station identifications are made, only the call letter designation of the international station is given and its assigned frequency: *And provided further,* That in the case of chain broadcasting the program is not carried simultaneously by another international station (except another station owned by the same licensee operated on a frequency in a different group to obtain continuity of signal service), the signals from which are directed to the same area. (See section 3(p) of the Communications Act of 1934 for the definition of “chain broadcasting.”)
[28 FR 13696, Dec. 14, 1963, as amended at 37 FR 25843, Dec. 5, 1972; 38 FR 18896, July 16, 1973]
#### § 73.609 Zones.

(a) For the purpose of allotment and assignment, the United States is divided into three zones as follows:

(1) Zone I consists of that portion of the United States located within the confines of the following lines drawn on the U.S. Albers Equal Area Projection Map (based on standard parallels 291⁄2° and 451⁄2°; North American datum): Beginning at the most easterly point on the State boundary line between North Carolina and Virginia; thence in a straight line to a point on the Virginia-West Virginia boundary line located at north latitude 37°49′ and west longitude 80°12′30′′; thence westerly along the southern boundary lines of the States of West Virginia, Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois to a point at the junction of the Illinois, Kentucky, and Missouri State boundary lines; thence northerly along the western boundary line of the State of Illinois to a point at the junction of the Illinois, Iowa, and Wisconsin State boundary lines; thence easterly along the northern State boundary line of Illinois to the 90th meridian; thence north along this meridian to the 43.5° parallel; thence east along this parallel to the United States-Canada border; thence southerly and following that border until it again intersects the 43.5° parallel; thence east along this parallel to the 71st meridian; thence in a straight line to the intersection of the 69th meridian and the 45th parallel; thence east along the 45th parallel to the Atlantic Ocean. When any of the above lines pass through a city, the city shall be considered to be located in Zone I. (See Figure 1 of § 73.699.)

(2) Zone II consists of that portion of the United States which is not located in either Zone I or Zone III, and Puerto Rico, Alaska, Hawaiian Islands and the Virgin Islands.

(3) Zone III consists of that portion of the United States located south of a line, drawn on the United States Albers Equal Area Projection Map (based on standard parallels 29.50 and 45.50 North American datum), beginning at a point on the east coast of Georgia and the 31st parallel and ending at the United States-Mexican border, consisting of arcs drawn with a 241.4 kilometer (150 mile) radius to the north from the following specified points:

| | North latitude | West longitude |
| --- | --- | --- |
| (a) | 29°40′00′′ | 83°24′00′′ |
| (b) | 30°07′00′′ | 84°12′00′′ |
| (c) | 30°31′00′′ | 86°30′00′′ |
| (d) | 30°48′00′′ | 87°58′30′′ |
| (e) | 30°00′00′′ | 90°38′30′′ |
| (f) | 30°04′30′′ | 93°19′00′′ |
| (g) | 29°46′00′′ | 95°05′00′′ |
| (h) | 28°43′00′′ | 96°39′30′′ |
| (i) | 27°52′30′′ | 97°32′00′′ |

When any of the above arcs pass through a city, the city shall be considered to be located in Zone II. (See Figure 2 of § 73.699.)

[28 FR 13660, Dec. 14, 1963, as amended at 33 FR 15422, Oct. 17, 1968; 50 FR 23697, June 5, 1985; 51 FR 44070, Dec. 8, 1986]
No. 11-9257.

#### Kemppainen *v.*Aransas County Detention Center.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 69.153 Presubscribed interexchange carrier charge (PICC). ( a ) A charge expressed in dollars and cents per line may be assessed upon the Multi-line business subscriber's presubscribed interexchange carrier to recover revenues totaling Average Price Cap CMT Revenues per Line month times the number of base period lines less revenues recovered through the End User Common Line charge established under § 69.152 and Interstate Access Universal Service Support Per Line (as defined in § 54.807 of this chapter) multiplied by base period lines for the applicable customer class and zones receiving such support, up to a maximum of $4.31 per line per month. In the event the ceilings on the PICC prevent the PICC from recovering all the residual common line/marketing and residual interconnection charge revenues, the PICC shall recover all residual common line/marketing revenues before it recovers residual interconnection charge revenues.
( b ) If an end-user customer does not have a presubscribed interexchange carrier, the local exchange carrier may collect the PICC directly from the end user.
( c ) [Reserved]
( d ) Local exchange carriers shall assess no more than five PICCs as calculated under paragraph (a) of this section for Primary Rate Interface ISDN service.
( e ) The maximum monthly PICC for Centrex lines shall be one-ninth of the maximum charge determined under paragraph (a) of this section, except that if a Centrex customer has fewer than nine lines, the maximum monthly PICC for those lines shall be the maximum charge determined under paragraph (a) of this section divided by the customer's number of Centrex lines.
( f ) The PICC shall not be applicable to any payphone lines.
( g ) - ( h ) [Reserved]
[65 FR 38703, June 21, 2000; 65 FR 57744, Sept. 26, 2000, as amended at 68 FR 43329, July 22, 2003]
Skip to main content (Press Enter).

College of Information and Cyberspace National Defense University

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission & Vision             
  -  Faculty & Staff             
  -  Fact Sheet             
  -  Alumni             
  -  Internships             
  -  FAQ 
-  Admissions    -  Eligibility Requirements             
  -  Admissions Calendar             
  -  Application Instructions             
  -  Apply Online             
  -  International Students 
-  Academics    -  Graduate Catalog             
  -  M.S. in Strategic Information and Cyberspace Studies      -  JPME Master's Degree             
    -  Cyber Workforce Master's Degree (Part Time) 
  -  Leadership Development Programs             
  -  Graduate Certificates             
  -  Academic Partners 
-  Current Students    -  JPME II  Incoming Students             
  -  LDP Incoming Students             
  -  Student Registration             
  -  Bring Your Own Device             
  -  IA Compliance             
  -  Completion Procedures / Order Transcripts             
  -  Student Services and Resources 
-  Events    -  Cyber Beacon             
  -  Cyber PME Colloquium             
  -  Hopper Award             
  -  Lecture Series             
  -  CYBERCOM Symposium 
-  NEWS		 
-  UC2    -  About             
  -  Events             
  -  Work With Us 
-  Center for Cybersecurity    -  About             
  -  Cybersecurity Center POC             
  -  Cybersecurity Supporting Faculty             
  -  CAE-CDE CISO Certificate Program             
  -  Cybersecurity Trending News             
  -  Cyber Labs      -  Ethical Hacking             
    -  Critical Infrastructure - SCADA 
  -  Cyber Exercises      -  Tabletop Exercise             
    -  Cyber Competitions 
  -  Cyber Resources and Awareness             
  -  Stakeholder / Industry Advisory Council 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Directions             
  -  Access to Ft. McNair             
  -  Map of Ft. McNair 

HomeNEWSNews & Announcements

## News & Announcements

# Welcome to Second Group of CIO LDP Students

The NDU iCollege is happy to welcome 14 students from multiple U.S. Federal Government agencies, including DoD and others, and from four international agencies including Algeria, Burundi, South Korea, and Morocco.  This cohort of students will study the Chief Information Officer Leadership Development Program (CIO LDP) curriculum for the next 14 weeks at NDU.This program combines a highly interactive, student-centered learning experience with education on CIO competencies, leadership skills, teambuilding, domestic field studies, and more.  More information on the CIO LDP can be found on our website, Academics page.  Dates for the fall 2016 CIO LDP will be announced soon.   Please contact the CIO LDP Director at russell.quirici@ndu.edu for more details on how to apply. 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
No. 11-9637.

#### Perez *v.*Smith, Superintendent, Shawangunk Correctional Facility.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-10019.

#### Hewitt *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
E RD

NEW YORK

NEW YORK

SUFFOLK CO

SUFFOLK CO

ATLANTIC

OCEAN

ATLANTIC

OCEAN

Old Town

Pond

Shinnecock

Inlet

East

Hampton Southampton

Sag

Harbor

OE S

Sag

Harbor

27

16

24

25

30"

27

45

24

22

30"

7

22'

20

45

7

000

28

28

7

45

000m

25

7

45

24

7

000m

30"

22

1

17

29

16

25

30" 23

19

45

23

52'

45

18

26

45

7 7

45

7

45

45

7

45

45

000m

220

50'

18

22'

45

000

20'

000 FEET

72°

23

7

29

20'

50'

47'

1

40°

15

E 28 7

7

30"

24

30"

7 7

17

40°

30"

26

45

72°

25

30

72°

45

30 440

FEET

45

47'

7

45

7

45

17' 7

7

23

45'

28

7

31

N

26

21

FEET

31

15'

15

27

45

460

15' 7

45

45

N

E

260

45

45

45

52'

000m

000 FEET

22

45'

40°

72°

20

21

27

45

45

26

22

30"

17'

40°

45

NEW

YORK

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

SAG HARBOR OE S QUADRANGLE

NEW YORK-SUFFOLK CO.

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

SAG HARBOR OE S, NY

2013

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

WXInterstate Route /. US Route H State Route

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Imagery...................................................NAIP, May 2011

Roads..............................................©2006-2012 TomTom

Names..........................................................GNIS, 2012

Hydrography....................National Hydrography Dataset, 2011

Contours....................................................Not Available

Boundaries....................Census, IBWC, IBC, USGS, 1972 - 2012

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 18T

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: New York Coordinate System of 1983 (long

island zone)

This map was produced to conform with the

National Geospatial Program US Topo Product Standard, 2011.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.6.7

CONTOURS NOT PRESENT BECAUSE AVAILABLE ELEVATION

DATA DO NOT MEET ACCURACY REQUIREMENTS

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0

MILES

1

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

YL

18T

×

Ø

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2013 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

1° 45 ́

31 MILS

13° 57 ́

248 MILS
# Academic Partner JMU to Offer CISSP Review Course

/ Published Oct. 7, 2015
**JMU**
James Madison University’s College of Business will sponsor a 10-­‐week CISSP Review Course online via Canvas beginning on January 4, 2016 featuring the recently updated 2015 CISSP material.  The course will consist of two 3-­‐hour online sessions per week for a total of 60 hours of online instruction. The course is open to career professionals as well as recent graduates of the INFOSEC MBA and MS programs who wish to take the CISSP Exam.

The course is led by an (ISC)2 authorized instructor.  Course participants will receive a 2015 student kit and exam voucher.  Price for the course is $2400.

Please mail check, payable to R&D Inc. to Kimberley Hoffman, MBA Program, James Madison University, MSC 0206, Harrisonburg, VA  22807.  Please provide your name, mailing address, contact email and phone number with your payment.  Registration payment is due no later than December 1, 2015.

For more information about the course, please email:  Henry Bromley at bromlehw@jmu.edu.
MEETING AGENDA  

DOMTAR ASHDOWN MILL BART DISCUSSION

U.S. EPA Region 6 Offices, Dallas TX

December 16, 2014

10:00 a.m.

 Introductions

 Review of mill operations

 Review EPA Region 6 BART Recommendations presented during the November 10th call

o Power Boiler #1

o Power Boiler #2

 Power Boiler #2 SO2 % Removal Standard

o Establish as a mass‐based limit

 Demonstrating compliance with BART requirements

 Timeline for Ashdown Mill  BART Compliance

 Incorporating the FIP BART Requirements into the Mill’s Title V permit

 Status of Sierra Club petition  

 Next Steps

o Region 6 timeline for the FIP

 Meeting Wrap up
..A_rJ



# :~

**~(**

**~** Regulator-y Evaluation
Docket No. FAA-l 

# 0/5-/q <67 bfcf--AI.M- 

# £ t(tJ..-

## 4.D Directorate Identifier: -AD /(mumake dwnges lo the l'a/ues in the lohlc hdmr

. you must en. wre the fowls update ocwrdi11gh-. If rlie r do 11of

. dick (or Tah) imo wulthe11 our u/fhe c/l(rngl.'d cl.' /1. Estimated Costs: Action Costs per Product (e.g

.. aircraft, engine, (e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor+ 

## u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do nor include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered and close-up) our) Products 

### SB 670BA-32-040 Part A: 

### 24.0 hr Part B: 24.0 hr 

# y.6 ' - l .ll q $31,000 

### 269 ·i ,,, I 

### Part C: 20.0 hr 

# tie1-0 Part D: 20.0 hr SB 670BA-32-042 

### 1.5 269 1.5 hr SB 670BA-32-043 14.0 

### 269 14.0 hr f t; 

### ModSum IS670528200033 4 

### ' 269 4 hr

' 

## ' '


## .. I
I

'I ,,I ' I ' ' I ' 

### ,,

'' 

## ,, ,I I ' !• I ('1 ,, .l 1 •(1 "
f f

**~{** ' I ' ' d· I The known number of products in compliance: 0 Total Costs ofcompliance for U.S. fleet : SI0.796.988 Costs covered under warranty (ifknown) 

## s On-Condition Costs: Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product (e.g

.. Inspection. (include access. (@$85/hour)

replacement) testing. and closeup)

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this.field to explain anything in the Estimated Cost s table that was assumed or might 110t be obvious. Thisjield can also be used to explain warranty costs): 

### Not All the SB are required to complied with. Depending on the option operator elect to use SB or combination or SB and ModSum is applicable. see MCAI for the configration detail. Executive Order 12866: 

### Could the AD be considered a ' 'significant regulatory



# action **'?~** YES* 

## D NO 

## IZ1 *Explanation: DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

### Is the AD significant?



# ~ YES* 

## D NOIZ] *Explanation: Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

### Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number ofsmall entities? Explain for either a Y cs or No answer. 

# 'ilt· YES 

## D NO 

## IZ1 Explanation: Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

### This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode oftransportation? 

## @ YES · 

# D NO 

### [.81 *Explanation:
#### § 64.401 Policies and procedures for provisioning and restoring certain telecommunications services in emergencies.

The communications common carrier shall maintain and provision and, if disrupted, restore facilities and services in accordance with policies and procedures set forth in Appendix A to this part.

[65 FR 48396, Aug. 8, 2000]
No. 11-5743.

#### Xayavongsane *v.*Florida.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.
Wniteb �tates QCourt of �peals 

for tbe jf eberal QCircuit 

-andWniteb �tates QCourt of 

jf eberal QCiaims 

ORDER 

Restricting Court Access to the National Courts 

Building Through November 22, 2020 

Based on continuing declared public health 

emergencies impacting Washington, D.C. and the National 

Capital Region, as well as ongoing efforts to mitigate 

community transmission and the impact of COVID-19, 

there is an ongoing need for the United States Court of 

Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the United States 

COlut of Federal Claims to continue to restrict public 

access to the Howard T. Markey National COluts Building. 

On behalf of both courts, we find p,usuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 207l(e) that there is an immediate need for this Order

altering the rules of both courts, effective upon entry of this

Order.

IT Is ORDERED THAT: 

(1) Administrative Order No. 20-06 is hereby amended

to extend the access restrictions and proced,ues in

the joint order dated June 26, 2020 (Administrative

Order No. 20-04) through November 22, 2020.

CERTIFIED COPY 

I HEREBY CERTIFY THIS DOCUMENT 

Administrative Order No. 2021-01 

IS A TRUE ANO CORRECT COPY OF lliE ORIGINAL ON FILE 

UNITED STATES COURT Of APPEAl.S 

FOR THE FEDERAL C1RCUIT 

PETER R. MARK$TEINER, Cl.ERK OF COURT 

),,r,:t/j,!,,i,._-- 7 57am. Oct 19 2020 ByJ. Pelto#. DeputyCleR. 

I/ 
2 ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER

(2) The Circuit Executive and Clerk of Court of the 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal 

Circuit, and the Clerk of Court for the United States 

Court of Federal Claims are directed to provide 

public notice of this Order and to take any necessary 

and proper actions to implement these restrictions.

FOR THE COURTS

October 19, 2020 /s/ Sharon Prost

 Date Sharon Prost

Chief Judge

United States Court of

Appeals for the 

Federal Circuit

October 19, 2020 /s/ Eleni M. Roumel

 Date Eleni M. Roumel

Chief Judge

United States Court of 

Federal Claims
No. 11-5872.

#### Hornbuckle *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.