alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 74
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 74 appear at 64 FR 4055, Jan. 27, 1999.

§ 74.461 Transmitter power. ( a ) Transmitter power is the power at the transmitter output terminals and delivered to the antenna, antenna transmission line, or any other impedance-matched, radio frequency load. For the purpose of this Subpart, the transmitter power is the carrier power.
( b ) The authorized transmitter power for a remote pickup broadcast station shall be limited to that necessary for satisfactory service and, in any event, shall not be greater than 100 watts, except that a station to be operated aboard an aircraft shall normally be limited to a maximum authorized power of 15 watts. Specific authorization to operate stations on board aircraft with an output power exceeding 15 watts will be issued only upon an adequate engineering showing of need, and of the procedures that will be taken to avoid harmful interference to other licensees.
(Sec. 5, 48 Stat. 1068; 47 U.S.C. 155)
[41 FR 29686, July 19, 1976, as amended at 43 FR 14662, Apr. 7, 1978]
EX-10.1






Exhibit 10.1




As of March 8, 2007




WPT Enterprises, Inc.


Attn: Adam Pliska


5900 Wilshire Blvd.


Suite 350


Los Angeles, CA 90036



	 	 	 
	Re:

	 	“World Poker Tour” – Amendment Number 8 to Season 2 Agreement

[Option Exercise Deadline Extension]






Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:



Reference is made to (i) that certain master agreement (the “Master Agreement”) dated as of
August 22, 2003 between WPT ENTERPRISES, INC. f/k/a WORLD POKER TOUR, L.L.C. (“Producer”) and THE
TRAVEL CHANNEL, L.L.C. (“TRV”); (ii) that certain agreement attached to the Master Agreement (the
“Attachment”), dated as of August 22, 2003 between Producer and TRV in connection with the second
season of the television production currently known as the “World Poker Tour” (the “Program”);
(iii) that certain fully executed Amendment to Season 2 Agreement (the “First Amendment”), dated as
of April 22, 2004; (iv) that certain fully executed Amendment Number 2 to Season 2 Agreement (the
“Second Amendment”) dated as of May 10, 2004; (v) that certain fully executed Amendment Number 3 to
Season 2 Agreement dated as of July 23, 2004 (“Third Amendment”); (vi) that certain fully executed
Amendment Number 4 to Season 2 Agreement (the “Fourth Amendment”) dated as of June 25, 2004; and
(vii) that certain fully executed Amendment 5 to Season 2 Agreement dated as of August 9, 2004 (the
“Fifth Amendment”); (viii) that certain fully executed Amendment 6 to Season 2 Agreement dated of
October 13, 2004; (ix) that certain fully executed Amendment 7 to the Season 2 Agreement dated May
18, 2005; and (x) that certain fully executed Amendment 7(a) to the Season 2 Agreement dated
January 25, 2006. The Master Agreement and the Attachment, as amended by the First Amendment, the
Second Amendment, the Third Amendment, the Fourth Amendment, the Fifth Amendment, the Sixth
Amendment, the Seventh Amendment and the Seventh Amendment (a) are collectively hereinafter
referred to as the “Agreement”.



Except as otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have
the meanings set forth in the Agreement. The parties hereby agree that the Agreement shall be
supplemented and amended as follows:



The following shall inserted into the Agreement as section 4(iii):



“4(iii) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary provided for in Section 4(a) of the Agreement, the
Option Exercise Deadline solely for Season Six shall be April 1, 2007 (i.e., the Option
Exercise Deadline shall be a hard deadline of April 1, 2007).”



Except as otherwise herein expressly amended and supplemented (i.e., in regard to the Season
Six Option Exercise Date), the Agreement is in all other aspects hereby ratified and confirmed.
Please acknowledge your acceptance of the foregoing by signing in the space provided below.



Very truly yours,



THE TRAVEL CHANNEL, L.L.C.



By: /s/ Pat Younge



Printed Name: Pat Younge

Title: Executive Vice President and General Manager



WPT ENTERPRISES, INC.



By: /s/ Adam Pliska



Adam Pliska

General Counsel
§ 73.1545 Carrier frequency departure tolerances. ( a ) *AM stations.* The departure of the carrier frequency for monophonic transmissions or center frequency for stereophonic transmissions may not exceed ±20 Hz from the assigned frequency.
( b ) *FM stations.* ( 1 ) The departure of the carrier or center frequency of an FM station with an authorized transmitter output power more than 10 watts may not exceed ±2000 Hz from the assigned frequency.
( 2 ) The departure of the carrier or center frequency of an FM station with an authorized transmitter output power of 10 watts or less may not exceed ±3000 Hz from the assigned frequency.
( c ) [Reserved]
( d ) *International broadcast stations.* The departure of the carrier frequency of an International broadcast station may not exceed 0.0015% of the assigned frequency on which the station is transmitting.
[44 FR 58734, Oct. 11, 1979; 44 FR 64408, Nov. 7, 1979, as amended at 47 FR 13165, Mar. 29, 1982; 65 FR 30004, May 10, 2000; 67 FR 21691, May 1, 2001; 89 FR 7255, Feb. 1, 2024]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), the Director, National Institutes of Health (NIH), announces the establishment of the NIH Office of Portfolio Analysis and Strategic Initiatives (OPASI) Council of Councils (Council).

The Council will consult with, and provide advice and recommendations to the Director NIH, the Director, OPASI, and the individual Institute and Center (IC) Directors on potential trans-NIH initiatives at the conceptual stage. The Council's advice and recommendations will assist the IC Directors in identifying trans-NIH initiatives to be pursued for further development.

Duration of this committee is two years from the date the Charter is filed.

Dated: August 8, 2006.

Elias Zerhouni,

Director, National Institutes of Health.

[FR Doc. 06-6966 Filed 8-16-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 23.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 Nos. 333-109889, 333-89368, 333-62866, 333-06163, 333-29103, 333-80313, 333-52339, 333-129895 and 333-163926) pertaining to the Non-Plan Stock Option, 1996 Stock Option Plan, New Executive Stock Option Plan, 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 1995 Directors' Stock Option Plan, 1996 Stock Option Plan, 1996 Non-Executive Stock Option Plan, 1988 Incentive Stock Option Plan, 2005 Stock Incentive Plan and 2009 Stock Incentive Plan of our reports dated August 5, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Landec Corporation and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Landec Corporation, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended May 29, 2011.





/s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP





San Fransciso, California


August, 5, 2011
No. 10-1371.

No. 10-1393.

#### Spectrum Stores, Inc., et al. *v.*Citgo Petroleum Corp.; and Fast Break Foods LLC et al. *v.*Saudi Arabian Oil Co., dba Saudi Aramco, et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certio-rari denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.

Reported below: 632 F. 3d 938.
No. 11-9034.

#### Varner *v.*Pennsylvania.

Super. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - 14 CFR Part 71
          - [Docket No. FAA-2006-25009; Airspace Docket No. 06-ACE-7]

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date. 

# SUMMARY:

This document confirms the effective date of the direct final rule which revises Class E airspace at Keokuk, IA.

#                         DATES:                         *Effective Date:*

0901 UTC, September 28, 2006.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Brenda Mumper, Air Traffic Division, Airspace Branch, ACE-520A, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: (816) 329-2524.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for comments in the                     **Federal Register**                     on June 26, 2006 (71 FR 36189). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would become effective on September 28, 2006. No adverse comments were received, and thus this notice confirms that this direct final rule will become effective on that date.                

Issued in Kansas City, MO on August 2, 2006.

Donna R. McCord,

Acting Area Director, Western Flight Services Operations.

[FR Doc. 06-6951 Filed 8-15-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

April 6, 2006

Mr. R. Matthew Molash

Hughes & Luce, L.L.P.

1717 Main Street, Suite 2800

Dallas, TX 75201

Mr. Terry D. Morgan

Terry Morgan & Associates, P.C.

1201 Elm St., Suite 4800

Dallas, TX 75270

RE:Case Number:  06-0266

Court of Appeals Number:  02-05-00439-CV

Trial Court Number:  2005-60397-393

Style:JNC PARTNERS DENTON, LLC

v.

CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas granted in part and denied in part, petitioner’s emergency motion to extend the temporary stays entered by the court of appeals, and issued a stay order in the above-referenced case.  A copy of this Court’s order is enclosed.

Sincerely,

Andrew Weber, Clerk

by Gena Pelham, Deputy Clerk

Case No. 06-0266Page 1
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                        National Institute of Nursing Research Initial Review Group.                    

*Date:*                        February 17-18, 2000.                    

*Time:*                        February 17, 2000, 8:30 AM to 5:00 PM.                    

*Agenda:*                        To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                        Building 45, Room 3AN-18B, MD 20892.                    

*Time:*                        February 18, 2000, 8:30 AM to 5:00 PM.                    

*Agenda:*                        To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                        Building 45, Room 3AN-18B, MD 20892.                    

*Contact Person:*                        Mary J. Stephens-Frazier Scientific Review Administrator, National Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, Room 3AN32, 45 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-5971.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.361, Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health HHS)

Dated: January 18, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-1685 Filed 1-24-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4824 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4824

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prevent the misuse of certain 
                        anti-racketeering laws.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 25, 1994

  Mr. Dornan (for himself, Mr. Doolittle, Mr. Crane, Mr. Smith of New 
  Jersey, Mr. Stearns, Mr. Solomon, Mr. Santorum, Mr. Livingston, Mr. 
  McHugh, Mr. Lipinski, and Mr. Hyde) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to prevent the misuse of certain 
                        anti-racketeering laws.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RACKETEERING DEFINITION.

    Section 1961(5) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``a profit-seeking purpose and'' after ``requires''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by this Act shall apply with respect to cases 
arising on or after the date of the enactment of this Act and to cases 
pending on that date.
                                 <all>
```
October 2023

6 0 7 : 7 ) 6

November 2023

6 0 7 : 7 ) 6

   

      

December 2023

6 0 7 : 7 ) 6

January 2024

6 0 7 : 7 ) 6

       

       

       

       

  

)HEUXDU\

6 0 7 : 7 ) 6

  

      

       

       

    

0DUFK

6 0 7 : 7 ) 6

 

      

      

      

      



6 0 7 : 7 ) 6

     

      

      

      

  

6 0 7 : 7 ) 6

   

      

      

      

     

       

       

    

-XQH

6 0 7 : 7 ) 6



      

      

      

      



-XO\

6 0 7 : 7 ) 6

     

      

      

      

   

$XJXVW

6 0 7 : 7 ) 6

  

      

      

      

      

6HSWHPEHU

6 0 7 : 7 ) 6

      

      

       

       

 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 

COURT SESSIONS CALENDAR

October 2023 – September 2024

Court Session Federal Holiday

      

       

       

       

   

0D\

 

      

      

      

      



$SULO
----

Information relating to the entry into force of the Cooperation Agreement between the European Community and the Principality of Andorra (1)

The procedures necessary for the entry into force of the Cooperation Agreement between the European Community and the Principality of Andorra, signed in Brussels on 15 November 2004, having been completed on 10 May 2005, this Agreement will enter into force, in conformity with its Article 14, on 1 July 2005.

----

(1)OJ L 359, 4.12.2004, p. 33.

----
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-117313, 333-108747, 333-94871, and 333-64503 of Island Pacific, Inc. and
subsidiaries on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-43626 on Form S-3
of our report, dated June 11, 2004, except for Note 19 as to which the date
is November 4, 2004, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Island
Pacific, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended March 31, 2004.

SINGER LEWAK GREENBAUM & GOLDSTEIN LLP
Los Angeles, CA
November 15, 2004
# Dr. JoAnna Shore

### Professor of Data Analytics

### 

### 

Academic Credentials: D. B. A. (2004), Argosy University, Sarasota, FL (Information Systems). Dissertation Title: An Examinationof the Technology Acceptance Model: Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in the Appalachian Region ofthe United States

M.S. (2020), University of Maryland University College, Maryland, (Data Analytics Certification).

M.Ed. (1998), Frostburg State University, Frostburg, MD (Interdisciplinary Program: MBA and TechnologyEducation).B.A. (1996), Frostburg State University, Frostburg, MD (Business Administration).

Relevant Professional Experience: 

Dr. Shore has 26 years of higher education teaching experience.  Before joining the College of Information and Cyberspace faculty in July 2023, she taught at Bowie State University, Nexford University, Allegany College of Maryland, and Frostburg State University.  In another role, she developed courses on Continuous Mitigation and Diagnostics and taught for ManTech International in Northern Virginia. Dr. Shore has been published over one dozen times in her career.

Current Research Interests:Data as KnowledgeContinuous Diagnostics and MitigationTechnology Acceptance ModelEmployee Surveillance PoliciesChapGPT as a Productivity ToolTelework as a Strategy
#### § 63.601 Contents of applications for authority to reduce the hours of service of public coast stations under the conditions specified in [§ 63.70](/on/2024-09-20/title-47/section-63.70).

### F.C.C. File No. T\_D\_\_\_

Month \_\_\_\_ Year \_\_\_\_

(Name of applicant)

(Address of applicant)

In the matter of Proposed Reduction in Hours of Service of a Public Coast Station Pursuant to [§ 63.70](/on/2024-09-20/title-47/section-63.70) of the Commission's rules.

Data regarding public coast station

(Call and address)

Present hours:

Monday through Friday

Saturday

Sunday

Proposed hours:

Monday through Friday

Saturday

Sunday

Proposed effective time and date of change

Average number of messages handled for month of \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_, 19\_\_

during total hours to be deleted

during maximum hour to be deleted

Data regarding substitute service to be provided by other public coast stations available and capable of providing service to the community affected, or in the marine area served by the public coast station involved:

| Station call and location | Operated by | Hours of service | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Monday thru Friday | Saturday | Sunday |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
701 P.2d 303

#### STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Ivan Perry DECKER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 15695.

Court of Appeals of Idaho.

May 31, 1985.

*684Alan E. Trimming, Ada County Public Defender, Boise, for defendant-appellant.

Jim Jones, Atty. Gen., Lynn E. Thomas, Sol. Gen., Boise, for plaintiff-respondent.

PER CURIAM.

In August 1983, Rod Peterson, a motor home dealer, loaned a pickup truck to Ivan Perry Decker. Decker failed to return it. He was subsequently charged with grand theft, I.C. §§ 18-2403(1), 18-2407(1). After a jury trial, he was convicted. He now appeals, challenging only the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction. Specifically, he contends the evidence was insufficient to prove that he “intended to permanently deprive the victim of the use [or] benefit of the vehicle.” 1 We affirm.

Appellate review of the sufficiency of the evidence is limited in scope. A judgment of conviction, entered upon a jury verdict, will not be set aside where there is substantial evidence upon which any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. *Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); *State v. Filson,*101 Idaho 381, 386, 613 P.2d 938, 943 (1980). “[W]e are precluded from substituting our judgment for that of the jury as to the credibility of witnesses, the weight of the testimony, and the reasonable inferences to be drawn from the evidence.” *State v. Campbell,*104 Idaho 705, 718-19, 662 P.2d 1149, 1162-63 (Ct.App.1983). Furthermore, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the respondent. *State v. Fenley,*103 Idaho 199, 203, 646 P.2d 441, 445 (Ct.App.1982).

We have reviewed the evidence under these standards. The state’s evidence shows that Decker wanted to purchase a motor home from Peterson but that a problem arose concerning credit approval from the bank. The problem could not be resolved until the next day. Because Decker was on foot, Peterson loaned him a pickup truck to be used overnight. Rather than returning the vehicle the next day, Decker drove it to Durango, Colorado, where he was eventually arrested. The jury reasonably could infer that Decker intended to deprive Peterson of the pickup.

The judgment of conviction is, therefore, affirmed.

1

. Decker’s argument, in so far as it presumes that theft requires intent to deprive the owner of his property "permanently," fails to take account of the modern language of I.C. § 18-2403. Decker was prosecuted under the modern statute.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**PAUL J. ABELN,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**MARY J.B. EIDELMAN, ESQUIRE AND RICHARD HUNTINGTON PEPPER,**  **ESQUIRE,**

**Respondents :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 325 MAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

**PAUL J. ABELN,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**MARY J.B. EIDELMAN, ESQUIRE AND RICHARD HUNTINGTON PEPPER,**  **ESQUIRE,**

**Respondents :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 326 MAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 7th day of October, 2015, the Petition for All owance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**