alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 73.4163 Noncommercial nature of educational broadcast stations. ( a ) See Second Report and Order, BC Docket 21136, FCC 81-204, adopted April 23, 1981. 86 FCC 2d 141; 46 FR 27944, May 22, 1981.
( b ) See Order, BC Docket 21136, FCC 82-327 adopted July 15, 1982. 90 FCC 2d 895; 47 FR 36171, August 19, 1982.
( c ) See Memorandum Opinion and Order, BC Docket 21136, FCC 84-105, adopted March 28, 1984. 97 FCC 2d 255; 49 FR 13534, April 5, 1984.
( d ) See, Public Notice, FCC 86-161, dated April 11, 1986. 51 FR 21800, June 16, 1986. Excerpt reprinted at 7 FCC Rcd 827.
( e ) See Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 90-111, adopted March 28, 1990. 5 FCC Rcd 4920.
[47 FR 54448, Dec. 3, 1982, as amended at 51 FR 26251, July 22, 1986; 59 FR 52087, Oct. 14, 1994]
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 By The Chief Executive Officer,

As Adopted
Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002.

I, Gerald L. Storch, Chief Executive Officer of Toys R Us, Inc. (the
Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended January 28, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Gerald L. Storch                                              
|Gerald L. Storch Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)                                     
|April 28, 2006
No. 11-5833.

#### Copeland *v.*United States.

Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 99.7









| | KPMG LLPBay Adelaide CentreSuite 4600333 Bay StreetToronto ONM5H 2S5 | Telephone
    (416) 777-8500Fax (416) 777-8818www.kpmg.ca
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------







Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm



The Board of Directors

Mountain Province Diamonds Inc.

We consent to the use of our reports, each dated March 28, 2017,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting incorporated
by reference in this annual report on Form 40-F.



Our report dated March 28, 2017, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements, contains an explanatory paragraph that states that Mountain Province Diamonds Inc. does not believe it will
be able to comply with the requirement under the terms of its loan facility to fund certain reserve accounts, and may not be able
to comply with certain other covenants required under the terms of the loan facility, and that these conditions, along with other
matters as set forth in Note 1 in the consolidated financial statements, indicate the existence of a material uncertainty that
casts substantial doubt about Mountain Province Diamonds Inc.’s ability to continue as a going concern.



Our report dated March 28, 2017, on the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, expresses our opinion that Mountain Province Diamonds Inc. did not maintain
effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016 because of the effect of material weaknesses on the
achievement of the objectives of the control criteria and contains an explanatory paragraph that states material weaknesses identified
and included in management’s assessment related to: inadequate design of management’s control in the Gahcho Kué
Project over (1) the review of manual journal entries (2) payroll changes and (3) supplies inventory.



Our report dated March 28, 2017, on the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, contains an emphasis of matter paragraph that states we do not express
an opinion or any other form of assurance on management’s statements referring to corrective actions taken after December
31, 2016, relative to the aforementioned material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting.







Chartered Professional Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants

March 28, 2017

Toronto, Canada





KPMG LLP is a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG LLP.
283P15

#### State v. Robert Earl Wilkerson

Defs PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-95)

Denied
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zap.Com Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Leonard DiSalvo, as
the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/ Leonard DiSalvo
Leonard DiSalvo
Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer
August 1, 2003

This Certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

19
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"2018-1720: Lummi Tribe v. US - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"JljtTcmRNw\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/3-07-2019-2018-1720-lummi-tribe-v-us-audio-uploaded\/\">2018-1720: Lummi Tribe v. US<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/3-07-2019-2018-1720-lummi-tribe-v-us-audio-uploaded\/embed\/#?secret=JljtTcmRNw\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“2018-1720: Lummi Tribe v. US” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"JljtTcmRNw\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Oral argument audio posted: Lummi Tribe v. US (mp3) Appeal Number: 2018-1720 To listen to more oral argument recordings, follow this link: Listen To Oral Arguments."}
No. 11-9581.

#### Gonzalez *v.*New York City Housing Authority et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 73.6024 Transmission standards and system requirements. ( a ) A Class A TV station must meet the requirements of §§ 73.682 and 73.687, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) A Class A TV station may continue to operate with the transmitter operated under its previous LPTV license, provided such operation does not cause any condition of uncorrectable interference due to radiation of radio frequency energy outside of the assigned channel. Such operation must continue to meet the requirements of § 74.750 of this chapter.
( c ) [Reserved]
( d ) A Class A station must meet the emission requirements of § 74.794 of this chapter. Stations within 275 kilometers of the US-Mexico border shall specify the full-service emission mask.
[65 FR 30009, May 10, 2000, as amended at 66 FR 21690, May 1, 2001; 69 FR 69331, Nov. 29, 2004; 89 FR 7264, Feb. 1, 2024]
§ 73.1715 Share time. Operation is permitted by two or more broadcast stations using the same channel in accordance with a division of hours mutually agreed upon and considered part of their licenses. ( a ) If the licenses of stations authorized to share time do not specify hours of operation, the licensees shall endeavor to reach an agreement for a definite schedule of periods of time to be used by each. Such agreement shall be in writing and each licensee shall file it in duplicate original with each application to the FCC in Washington, DC for renewal of license. If and when such written agreements are properly filed in conformity with this section, the file mark of the FCC will be affixed thereto, one copy will be retained by the FCC, and one copy returned to the licensee and will be considered as part of the station's license. If the license specifies a proportionate time division, the agreement shall maintain this proportion. If no proportionate time division is specified in the license, the licensees shall agree upon a division of time. Such division of time shall not include simultaneous operation of the stations unless specifically authorized by the terms of the license
( b ) If the licensees of stations authorized to share time are unable to agree on a division of time, the FCC in Washington, DC shall be so notified by a statement filed with the applications for renewal of licenses. Upon receipt of such statement, the FCC will designate the applications for a hearing and, pending such hearing, the operating schedule previously adhered to shall remain in full force and effect.
( c ) A departure from the regular schedule in a time-sharing agreement will be permitted only in cases where an agreement to that effect is put in writing, is signed by the licensees of the stations affected thereby and filed in triplicate by each licensee with the FCC in Washington, DC prior to the time of the time of the proposed change. If time is of the essence, the actual departure in operating schedule may precede the actual filing of written agreement, provided appropriate notice is sent to the FCC.
( d ) If the license of an AM station authorized to share time does not specify the hours of operation, the station may be operated for the transmission of regular programs during the experimental period provided an agreement thereto is reached with the other stations with which the broadcast day is shared: *And further provided,* Such operation is not in conflict with § 73.72 (Operating during the experimental period). Time-sharing agreements for operation during the experimental period need not be submitted to the FCC.
( e ) Noncommercial educational FM stations are authorized for share time operation according to the provisions of § 73.561.
[43 FR 45849, Oct. 4, 1978, as amended at 47 FR 40174, Sept. 13, 1982; 84 FR 2758, Feb. 8, 2019]
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-40238

Summary Calendar

IPOLITO CAMPOS

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

PAUL KASTNER, Warden/chief Executive Officer

Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:07-CV-96

Before WIENER, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ipolito Campos, federal prisoner # 54618-083, seeks to appeal the district

court’s dismissal of his action that he characterized as an independent action in

equity. Campos was convicted in the Eastern District of Virginia of assaulting

and attempting to murder a police officer. Campos’s conviction was affirmed on

direct appeal to the Fourth Circuit. United States v. Campos, 136 F. App’x 557

(4th Cir. 2005). 

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 23, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-40238

2

On appeal to this court, Campos argues that he did not commit the crimes

of assaulting and attempting to murder a police officer and equity therefore

prevented him from being convicted and imprisoned for crimes that were thus

an impossibility. 

One of the essential elements of an independent action in equity is a

showing of the absence of any adequate remedy at law. Bankers Mortgage Co.

v. U.S., 423 F.2d 73, 79 (5th Cir. 1970). The Supreme Court has further noted

that an independent action in equity should be available only to prevent a grave

miscarriage of justice. United States v. Beggerly, 524 U.S. 38, 45 (1998).

Campos’s action did not meet these demanding standards. 

Since Campos’s action was not filed in the federal district court in which

he was convicted and sentenced, the district court did not have jurisdiction to

alternatively treat his action as a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See Pack v.

Yousuff, 218 F.3d 448, 451 (5th Cir. 2000). Because Campos did not assert that

he was convicted of an offense that is nonexistent as to all persons, his action

also did not meet the essential criteria of a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 made

in conjunction with the savings clause of § 2255(e). See Reyes-Requena v. United

States, 243 F.3d 893, 904 (5th Cir. 2001). 

Campos therefore filed an unauthorized action which the district court was

without jurisdiction to entertain. See United States v. Early, 27 F.3d 140, 142

(5th Cir. 1994). Campos has thus appealed from the dismissal of a meaningless,

unauthorized action. Id. We affirm on the basis that the district court lacked

jurisdiction. Id.

AFFIRMED.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 4097

_____________________________
R AY J ONES , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Angela M. Cox , Judge

. April 15, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W ETHERELL , O STERHAUS , and W INOKUR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Ray Jones, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kaitlin Weiss, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
No. 11-9674.

#### Hooper *v.*Workman, Warden.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-5517.

#### Anderson *v.*Amawi et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### § 73.4108 [Reserved]
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Community Bank Corporation of America (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Sue A. Gilman, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |     |  |                                        
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Date: November 8, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Sue A. Gilman                      
|                       |  |     |  | Sue A. Gilman, Executive Vice President
|                       |  |     |  | and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF

TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)





Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers, Mark Landy, as Chief Executive Officer, and Patrick McGowan, as Chief Financial Officer, of MIV Therapeutics, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Form 10-Q") that, to the best of their knowledge:



(1)     the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)     the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|Dated: January 20, 2009 | /s/ Mark LandyMark Landy
Chief Executive Officer          
|----------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: January 20, 2009 | /s/ Patrick McGowanPatrick McGowan
Chief Financial Officer
### NORFOLK,

**~s.** 

### ( **0~~[\fO\**

### \\ 

## r A. 

### f 

### TH Of' **;\1A~SACHt:SETTS** 

### SUfioJU.Ok COuAl CIVIL ACTION NO.l015-Q0213 

### HOSTOl' EXEC

### 'C) IVL HELICOPTERS, 

### LLC; ,\UU. A VIATIO:"l **~ERVICES,** 

### LLC,

**Plaintiff~** 

### FUGHTLEVIL **~ORWOOD,** 

### LLC; t.A<.: Rl<..Al.TV TRUST 

### ll; and PETER EICHLEAY, Infendants 

### RECEIVED & 

### Fll ED Jt.:'Q&.,;,
**C~tJ\,,** 

### CF

**~** 

### :.::; CJl.RiS NORFOLK C0lJN1Y[_.- 

## _3/C,.f/.j fol.ov•mg a heanng or. pl.untu'f',.;

**reqt.~t** tor 

### apn:liminary mJunction 

### and

**revu~w** of 

### :3. 2W5, along the [A>t 

### Gaud 

### Lot Property lme at 

### !be !'-:orwood MeruonAl or **ob~tnJC'I:r.g tt;;ce~~**  :oN i::dween 

### Lot F and Lot G: 

### L·Y G :Y• 

### a t):nely 

### mnnnn, And 

### r.•train !Torn _?lcwmg :my 

### snow from

**f.JJ~** ri 

### ontc 

### r.,. 

### r.

### 4) E.1.1cn Plair.tlffs:1aJI rctrwn tTom 

### rueung II.IJcruts 

### on 1.01

# uar.u Dl4Y **u.U~lz.c** .uv. u ;;s a taxi·say or,:} **~the** c..>vem **~age 1~**  done 

### tc Lot 

## u es a result **cfPl~otiffs'** fuel 

### true;,- drim1g

**~** •'cl : 

### o• 

### G, Plrunt.:f.fs \'v1ll be

### respon:.ible for the cost of :· l r.:ach Dcfcn-1:-.ui! :.hal•r.:**~ra:u1r,1m** tue.i::g cllrcrtift., on Lot f and ll'I"Y **~tiJi:r.c** the **s~-ca:led** •·: 5

**f; ,.**  **~r ~~)**  **~r··** en Lo. 1- as <:1 result ofDef(:ndanl use ofthe "1 'i fu<lt S':T!?' 

### on **l~">:** }' DefcnJ.u"1t< wdi be 

### responsJ•le for 

### the ..:ost of

### re1U10nable repairS \)I _!..I, 

### 3_pphceo,e "t::-Jcdls) of:a:lC pur6t:..4it tO 

### wruclJ any piaintiffmay i;lllD ngbts to DA1ED; 

### 'v1an:u 5. 201

**~**
No. 11-5314.

#### Apodaca *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Education

# AGENCY:

Department of Education. 

# ACTION:

Notice; correction. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of Education published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of June 21, 2000, concerning a request for comments on the Evaluation of the 21st Century Community Learning Centers Program. The reporting and recordkeeping responses on this document were incorrectly stated.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jacqueline Montague, 202-708-5359. 

## Correction 

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of June 21, 2000, in FR Doc 00-15573, on page 38521, in the 1st column, correct the “Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour Burden” to read:                     

Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour Burden: Responses: 18,780; Burden Hours: 41,090. 

Dated: June 29, 2000. 

John Tressler, 

Leader, Regulatory Information Management. 

[FR Doc. 00-17009 Filed 7-5-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4000-01-P