alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 64.632 Letter of authorization form and content. ( a ) An iTRS provider may use a written or electronically signed letter of authorization to obtain authorization of an iTRS user's request to change his or her default provider. A letter of authorization that does not conform with this section is invalid for purposes of this subpart.
( b ) The letter of authorization shall be a separate document or located on a separate screen or Web page. The letter of authorization shall contain the following title “Letter of Authorization to Change my Default Provider” at the top of the page, screen, or Web page, as applicable, in clear and legible type.
( c ) The letter of authorization shall contain only the authorizing language described in paragraph (d) of this section and be strictly limited to authorizing the new default provider to implement a default provider change order. The letter of authorization shall be signed and dated by the iTRS user requesting the default provider change.
( d ) At a minimum, the letter of authorization must be printed with a type of sufficient size and readable type to be clearly legible and must contain clear and unambiguous language that confirms: ( 1 ) The iTRS user's registered name and address and each telephone number to be covered by the default provider change order;
( 2 ) The decision to change the default provider from the original default provider to the new default provider;
( 3 ) That the iTRS user designates [insert the name of the new default provider] to act as the iTRS user's agent and authorizing the new default provider to implement the default provider change; and
( 4 ) That the iTRS user understands that only one iTRS provider may be designated as the TRS user's default provider for any one telephone number.
( e ) If any portion of a letter of authorization is translated into another language then all portions of the letter of authorization must be translated into that language. Every letter of authorization must be translated into the same language as any promotional materials, descriptions or instructions provided with the letter of authorization.
( f ) Letters of authorization submitted with an electronically signed authorization must include the consumer disclosures required by Section 101(c) of the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act.
[78 FR 40609, July 5, 2013]
Petition for Exemption 14 CFR 11.81

Craig Beebe: 2627 N. Ridgewood Dr. Wichita, KS 67220 (316) 265-1105

I am a wedding cinematographer. Using an aerial shot of the church or venue adds a high-end production quality to my work. I would never fly during a ceremony or around large groups of people. My goal is to capture an establishing shot from above so the viewer can see where the wedding will take place. The flight can be done early in the morning before any guests arrive. I will never need to fly above 200’ and would never need to fly over any buildings or structures. I plan to fly in an empty parking lot close to the church or venue. Also, many of our weddings are located in rural areas such as farms and private building structures with several acres of surrounding land.

Using a few aerial shots in our work helps to tell the story of the bride and grooms day. Our customers appreciate the big budget look of aerial videography. I believe I will not a ff ect the safety of the community. The drone will be used responsibly and for very short periods of time. I can usually get the shot I need and be back on the ground within 4-5 minutes. The best aerial shots of a church/ venue are usually captured at low altitudes. Somewhere between 75’ and 150’. I would never have a reason to go above these altitudes.

In summary, I hope to fly my Phantom Vision Plus 2 for commercial use for wedding cinematography. My registration number is: FA3PYAYEX7. I will maintain safe practices and follow all rules and regulations of the FAA. In my opinion hobbyist are much more of a threat. Working professionals have much more to lose. Flying irresponsibly could jeopardize my business which I have devoted my life to building. Thank you for your consideration.

Craig Beebe
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**








CERTIFICATION
      OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







I,
      Ernest
      Cheung, Chief Financial Officer of China Mobility Solutions,Inc.,
      certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as enacted by Section 906 ofthe
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1)
        the
        Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarterly period ended March
        31,
        2006 (the "Periodic Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies
        with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of China Mobility
        Solutions, Inc.








Dated: July
              24,
              2006
            /s/
              Ernest CheungErnest
                Cheung,
              Chief
                Financial Officer






A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to China Mobility Solutions, Inc. and will
      be
      retained by China Mobility Solutions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 61.40 Private line rate structure guidelines. ( a ) The Commission uses a variety of tools to determine whether a dominant carrier's private line tariffs are just, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory. The dominant carrier's burden of cost justification can be reduced when its private line rate structures comply with the following five guidelines. ( 1 ) Rate structures for the same or comparable services should be integrated;
( 2 ) Rate structures for the same or comparable services should be consistent with one another;
( 3 ) Rate elements should be selected to reflect market demand, pricing convenience for the carrier and customers, and cost characteristics; a rate element which appears separately in one rate structure should appear separately in all other rate structures;
( 4 ) Rate elements should be consistently defined with respect to underlying service functions and should be consistently employed through all rate structures; and
( 5 ) Rate structures should be simple and easy to understand.
( b ) The guidelines do not preclude a carrier, in a given case when a private line tariff does not comply with these guidelines, from justifying its departure from the guidelines and showing that its tariff is just, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory.
[49 FR 40869, Oct. 18, 1984, as amended at 76 FR 43213, July 20, 2011]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the Public Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Advisory Committee on CARES Business Plan Studies will meet on Friday, September 8, 2006, from 9 a.m. until 3 p.m., in the Dining Room of the Nursing Home Care Unit, Building 90, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, 4951 Arroyo Road, Livermore, CA. The meeting is open to the public.

The purpose of the Committee is to provide advice to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs on proposed business plans at those VA facility sites identified in May 2004 as requiring further study by the Capital Asset Realignment for Enhanced Services (CARES) Decision document.

The objectives of the Local Advisory Panel meeting are to communicate the Secretary's decision on the specific options to be evaluated and the timeframe for the completion of the study. Additional presentations will focus on the VA-selected contractor's methodology and tools to evaluate the remaining options. The agenda will also accommodate public commentary on implementation issues associated with each option.

                    Interested persons may attend and present oral or written statements to the Committee. For additional information regarding the meeting, please contact Mr. Jay Halpern, Designated Federal Officer, (00CARES), 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20024, by phone at (202) 273-5994, or by e-mail at                     *jay.halpern@hq.med.va.gov.*

Dated: August 11, 2006.

By Direction of the Secretary.

E. Philip Riggin,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 06-7075  Filed 8-21-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4191 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4191

   To designate the United States Post Office located at 9630 Estate 
   Thomas in Saint Thomas, Virgin Islands, as the ``Aubrey C. Ottley 
                      United States Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 13, 1994

 Mr. de Lugo introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To designate the United States Post Office located at 9630 Estate 
   Thomas in Saint Thomas, Virgin Islands, as the ``Aubrey C. Ottley 
                      United States Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States Post Office located at 9630 Estate Thomas in 
Saint Thomas, Virgin Islands, shall be known and designated as the 
``Aubrey C. Ottley United States Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the post office referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Aubrey C. Ottley United 
States Post Office''.

                                 <all>
```
No. 11-5332.

#### Norvell *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 6th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            College of Information and Cyberspace
                    National Defense University
                CIC
        Search
                    Search CIC:
                        Search
                Search CIC:
                    Search
    Home

    About 
        Mission & Vision

    Faculty & Staff

    Fact Sheet

    Alumni

    Internships

    FAQ

    Admissions 
        Eligibility Requirements

    Admissions Calendar

    Application Instructions

    Apply Online

    International Students

    Academics 
        Graduate Catalog

    JPME Master Degree

    Distance Learning Master Degree

    Leadership Development Programs

    Graduate Certificates

    Academic Partners

    Current Students 
        JPME II  Incoming Students

    LDP Incoming Students

    Student Registration

    Bring Your Own Device

    IA Compliance

    Completion Procedures / Order Transcripts

    Student Services and Resources

    Events
    
        Cyber Beacon

    Cyber PME Colloquium

    Hopper Award

    Lecture Series

    CYBERCOM Symposium

    NEWS

    UC2
    
        About

    Events

    Work With Us

    Center for Cybersecurity
    
        About

    Cybersecurity Center POC

    Cybersecurity Supporting Faculty

    CAE-CDE CISO Certificate Program

    Cybersecurity Trending News

    Cyber Labs
        
        Ethical Hacking

    Critical Infrastructure - SCADA

    Cyber Exercises
        
        Tabletop Exercise

    Cyber Competitions

    Cyber Resources and Awareness

    Stakeholder / Industry Advisory Council

    Contact 
        Contact Us

    Directions

    Access to Ft. McNair

    Map of Ft. McNair  Home
  NEWS
  News & Announcements
 News & Announcements Download
 Details
 Share
 News
 2023 DoD UC2 Workshop Hosted by CIC
 UC2 will be hosting a workshop on December 6, 2023. This session's topics are 1) *Implementing Zero Trust at the Tactical Warfighting Edge* and 2) *Managing Cyber Risks to Missions.*The first-place winning research team for each topic will present their findings. The latter half of the day will provide opportunities for the collaborative shaping of future UC2 research questions. **Agenda Available for Download Here** Register Now →
 SHARE
 PRINT
 National Defense University


College of Information and Cyberspace

300 Fifth Ave., Bldg. 62
Fort Lesley J. McNair
Washington, DC 20319-5066

202-685-6300
                    Stay Connected
                
                
                DOD Privacy & Security
 DOD Links Disclaimer
 DOD Social Media Policy
 DOD Web Policy
 FOIA
 NDU System of Records Notice
 NDU Privacy & Security Notice
 No FEAR Act
 Open GOV
 Plain Writing Act
 Section 508
 Small Business Act
 USA.gov
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

June 25, 2012

s0618

Order 

June 25, 2012

144843

JOHN L. HALFORD,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 144843

COA: 304068

Genesee CC: 11-095586-NO

CITY OF FLINT,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 13, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

CAVANAGH and HATHAWAY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Community Bank Corporation of America (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the Report), I, John A. Stewart, Jr., Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |     |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 13, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ John A. Stewart, Jr.             
|                   |  |     |  | John A. Stewart, Jr., Senior Vice    
|                   |  |     |  | President and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-3 (File No. 333-13955 and No. 333-13959) and in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-37523) of Sterling Commerce, Inc., and in
the related Prospectuses of our report dated November 7, 1997, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Sterling Commerce, Inc.
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30,
1997.
 
                                          Ernst & Young LLP
 
Dallas, Texas
November 18, 1997
§ 73.3589 Threats to file petitions to deny or informal objections. ( a ) No person shall make or receive any payments in exchange for withdrawing a threat to file or refraining from filing a petition to deny or an informal objection. For the purposes of this section, reimbursement by an applicant of the legitimate and prudent expenses of a potential petitioner or objector incurred reasonably and directly in preparing to file a petition to deny will not be considered to be payment for refraining from filing a petition to deny or informal objection. Payments made directly to a potential petitioner or objector, or a person related to a potential petitioner or objector, to implement nonfinancial promises are prohibited unless specifically approved by the Commission.
( b ) Whenever any payment is made in exchange for withdrawing a threat to file or refraining from filing a petition to deny or informal objection, the licensee must file with the Commission a copy of any written agreement related to the dismissal or withdrawal, and an affidavit setting forth: ( 1 ) Certification that neither the would-be petitioner, nor any person or organization related to the would-be petitioner, has received or will receive any money or other consideration in connection with the citizens' agreement other than legitimate and prudent expenses reasonably incurred in preparing to file the petition to deny;
( 2 ) Certification that unless such arrangement has been specifically approved by the Commission, neither the would-be petitioner, nor any person or organization related to the would-be petitioner, is or will be involved in carrying out, for a fee, any programming ascertainment, employment or other nonfinancial initiative referred to in the citizens' agreement; and
( 3 ) The terms of any oral agreement.
( c ) For purposes of this section: ( 1 ) Affidavits filed pursuant to this section shall be executed by the licensee, if an individual; a partner having personal knowledge of the facts, if a partnership; or an officer having personal knowledge of the facts, if a corporation or association.
( 2 ) “Legitimate and prudent expenses” are those expenses reasonably incurred by a would-be petitioner in preparing to file its petition for which reimbursement is being sought.
( 3 ) “Other consideration” consists of financial concessions, including but not limited to the transfer of assets or the provision of tangible pecuniary benefit, as well as non-financial concessions that confer any type of benefit on the recipient.
[55 FR 28914, July 16, 1990]
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer
of ArthroCare Corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:



Date: February 14, 2011

By:

/s/TODD NEWTON Todd Newton Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer


The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   Exhibit 10.21


                               DEED OF ASSIGNMENT
                               ------------------


BETWEEN:


Telxon Corporation of 3330 West Market Street, P.O. Box 5582, Akron, OH
44334-0582, U.S.A. (the "Assignor")

and

Aironet Wireless Communications, Inc. of 3875 Embassy Parkway, OH 44334-0292,
U.S.A. (the "Assignee")

In consideration of the sum of NIS 10.00 (Ten New Israel Shekels) paid to us,
the Assignor, we hereby assign, transfer and set over to the Assignee, all of
our right, title and interest in and to Israel Patent Application No. 127628
for "Cellular System Hand-Off Protocol"

And we, the said Assignee, hereby accept the said assignment.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF WE HAVE SET OUR HAND

THIS 4th DAY OF AUGUST, 1999

-------------------------------------------------------
Assignor                             Telxon Corporation
-------------------------------------------------------

signature                            /s/Glenn S. Hansen
-------------------------------------------------------

name of person signing               Glenn S. Hansen
-------------------------------------------------------

                                     Vice President,
position of person signing         Legal Administration
-------------------------------------------------------


-------------------------------------------------------
Assignee                     Aironet Wireless Communications, Inc.
-------------------------------------------------------

signature                            /s/Roger J. Murphy
-------------------------------------------------------

name of person signing               Roger J. Murphy
-------------------------------------------------------

position of person signing           President and CEO
-------------------------------------------------------