alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Inter-City Security Company, a corporation, et al., *Appellants,*vs. E. L. Barbee, *Appellee.*

143 So. 791.

Division B.

Decision filed September 14, 1932.

Petition for rehearing denied October 20, 1932.

W. *M. Bostivich, Jr.,*and *AxteTl & Rinehart,*for Appellants ;

*Clifford, T. Inglis,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been sub*672mittecl to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises,- it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.

Upon Petition for a Rehearing.

Per Curiam.

By order entered September 14, 1932, the decree appealed from in this case was1 affirmed by Division B of this Court without opinion. A reconsideration of the case convinces us that a petition for rehearing which has been applied for, should be denied for the reasons hereinafter stated.

All that the tax laws require is that an assessment roll shall show such description of the taxed property as will make it possible for a surveyor, with the aid of the whole tax roll and the infonnation conveyed thereby, to identify the property with reasonable accuracy. Trust Company of Florida vs. City of Tampa, 103 Fla. 628, 138 Sou. Rep. 73. Considered in connection with the evidence in this case, there is ample basis for the Chancellor’s finding under this rule to the effect that the descriptions involved in the instant case were not void for uncertainty, or so insufficient as to preclude foreclosure of the tax certificates based on the assessments containing such descriptions.

The claim for the statutory attorney’s fee provided for by Section 18 of Chapter 14572, Acts 1929 (Sec. 1003-6 Comp. Gen. Laws 1932 Supp.), was also properly allowed because such attorney’s fees are in the nature of an ad*673ditional statutory penalty imposed for non-payment of the tax, and is allowed as part of the costs in enforcing the collection. In seeking a *statutory*attorney’s fee permitted to be recovered as part of the costs of foreclosing a delinquent tax certificate under Chapter 14572, Acts 1929, an allegation that the fee is claimed and a prayer for its allowance in the event of foreclosure, with proofs to support the basis for the allowance and the reasonableness of what is claimed, is sufficient to warrant a decree allowing the statutory fee as an incident to a decree of foreclosure. There is nothing in Brett vs. First Nat. Bank, 97 Fla. 284, 120 So. 554, and kindred cases which conflicts with the foregoing rule. Here the attorney’s fee is a part of a permitted statutory recovery.

The petition for a rehearing must be denied and it is so ordered.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.
```

[112th Congress Public Law 180]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 126 STAT. 1415]]

Public Law 112-180
112th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To designate the United States courthouse under construction at 101 
 South United States Route 1 in Fort Pierce, Florida, as the ``Alto Lee 
 Adams, Sr., United States Courthouse''. <<NOTE: Oct. 5, 2012 -  [H.R. 
                                1791]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse under construction at 101 South United 
States Route 1 in Fort Pierce, Florida, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Alto Lee Adams, Sr., United States Courthouse''.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Alto Lee Adams, 
Sr., United States Courthouse''.

    Approved October 5, 2012.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1791:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 112-282 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 157 (2011):
                                    Nov. 14, 16, considered and passed 
                                        House.
                                                        Vol. 158 (2012):
                                    Sept. 21, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
§ 10.250 Notification to existing subscribers of non-participation in WEA. ( a ) A CMS provider that elects not to transmit WEA Alert Messages, in part or in whole, shall provide clear and conspicuous notice, which takes into account the needs of persons with disabilities, to existing subscribers of its non-election or partial election to provide Alert messages by means of an announcement amending the existing subscriber's service agreement.
( b ) For purposes of this section, a CMS provider that elects not to transmit WEA Alert Messages, in part or in whole, shall use the notification language set forth in § 10.240 (c) or (d) respectively, except that the last line of the notice shall reference FCC Rule 47 CFR 10.250, rather than FCC Rule 47 CFR 10.240.
( c ) In the case of prepaid customers, if a mailing address is available, the CMS provider shall provide the required notification via U.S. mail. If no mailing address is available, the CMS provider shall use any reasonable method at its disposal to alert the customer to a change in the terms and conditions of service and directing the subscriber to voice-based notification or to a Web site providing the required notification.
[73 FR 54525, Sept. 22, 2008, as amended at 78 FR 16807, Mar. 19, 2013]
§ 69.113 Non-premium charges for MTS-WATS equivalent services. ( a ) Charges that are computed in accordance with this section shall be assessed upon interexchange carriers or other persons that receive access that is not deemed to be premium access as this term in defined in § 69.105(b)(1) in lieu of carrier charges that are computed in accordance with §§ 69.105, 69.106, 69.118, 69.124, and 69.127.
( b ) The non-premium charge for the Carrier Common Line element shall be computed by multiplying the premium charge for such element by .45.
( c ) For telephone companies that are not subject to price cap regulation as that term is defined in § 61.3(x) of this chapter, the non-premium charge for the Local Switching element shall be computed by multiplying a hypothetical premium charge for such element by .45. The hypothetical premium charge for such element shall be computed by dividing the annual revenue requirement for each element by the sum of the projected access minutes for such period and a number that is computed by multiplying the projected non-premium minutes for such element for such period by .45. For telephone companies that are price cap carriers, the non-premium charge for the Local Switching element shall be computed by multiplying the premium charge for such element by .45. Though June 30, 1993, the non-premium charge shall be computed by multiplying the LS2 charge for such element by .45.
( d ) The non-premium charge or charges for the interconnection charge element shall be computed by multiplying the corresponding premium charge or charges by .45.
( e ) The non-premium charge for any BSEs in local switching shall be computed by multiplying the premium charge for the corresponding BSEs by .45.
[54 FR 6293, Feb. 9, 1989, as amended at 55 FR 42386, Oct. 19, 1990; 55 FR 50559, Dec. 7, 1990; 56 FR 33881, July 24, 1991; 57 FR 54721, Nov. 20, 1992; 59 FR 10304, Mar. 4, 1994; 64 FR 46594, Aug. 26, 1999]
§ 54.1602 Emergency Broadband Benefit. ( a ) The Emergency Broadband Benefit Program shall provide reimbursement to a participating provider for providing a discount on the price of broadband internet access service (and associated equipment), a connected device, or both, to an eligible household during the emergency period.
( b ) Participating providers may allow consumers whose households qualify for the Emergency Broadband Benefit Program pursuant to 47 CFR 54.1605, to apply the Emergency Broadband Benefit to any residential service plan that includes broadband internet access service or a bundle of broadband internet access service along with fixed or mobile voice telephony service, text messaging service, or both.
#### Julius T. Horney, *Plaintiff in Error,*vs. C. H. Roquemore, Annie D. Rudd, J. D. Roquemore, Zach Roquemore, R. D. Roquemore, Terese Jones, and Cathryn Roquemore, *Defendants in Error.*

145 So. 593.

Division B.

Decision filed October 3, 1932.

Petition for rehearing denied November 1, 1932.

*Carroll D. Judson*and *Patrick H. Hears,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Peterson, Carver & Langston*and *Edwards & Harchant,*for Defendants in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel *900for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P.J. and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [AZ-910-0777-XP-241A]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Arizona Resource Advisory Council Meeting notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces a meeting of the Arizona Resource Advisory Council (RAC).

                        The business meeting will be held on September 6, 2006, in St. George, Utah, at the Arizona Strip District Office located at 245 East Riverside Drive. It will begin at 9 a.m. and conclude at 4 p.m.—Mountain Standard Time. The agenda items to be covered include: Review of the March 2 and June 8, 2006, Meeting Minutes; BLM State Director's Update on Statewide Issues; Presentations BLM's Vermilion Cliffs National Monument—Coyote Buttes North; and growing interest in uranium                               ( print page 46508)                            mining on the Arizona Strip; Updates on the Recreation Resource Advisory Committee, and Arizona Land Use Planning; RAC Questions on written reports from BLM Field Managers; Field Office Rangeland Resource Team Proposals; Reports by the Standards and Guidelines, Recreation, Off-Highway Vehicle Use, Public Relations, Land Use Planning and Tenure, and Wild Horse and Burro Working Groups; Reports from RAC members; and discussion of future meetings. A public comment period will be provided at 11:30 a.m. on September 6, 2006, for any interested publics who wish to address the Council.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Deborah Stevens, Bureau of Land Management, Arizona State Office, One North Central Avenue, Suite 800, Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4427, (602) 417-9215.

Joanie Losacco,

Acting Arizona State Director.

[FR Doc. 06-6890 Filed 8-11-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-32-M
Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement



 EXHIBIT 4.1 
 THE STRIDE RITE CORPORATION 
 Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement 
 THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1, executed as of March 13, 2007, is made to the RIGHTS AGREEMENT, dated as of June 18, 1997 (the “Agreement”),
between The Stride Rite Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”), and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as Rights Agent (the “Rights Agent”). 
 In accordance with the provisions of Section 27 of the Agreement, the Agreement is hereby amended as follows: 
 1. Section 1(s) of the Agreement is amended by deleting such Section 1(h) in its entirety and substituting therefor the following: 

“(h) “Final Expiration Date” shall mean the close of business on March 26, 2007.” 
 2. Section 7(a) of the Agreement is amended by deleting such 7(a) in its entirety and substituting therefore the following: 
 “(a) The registered holder of any Right Certificate may exercise the Rights evidenced thereby (except as otherwise provided herein) in whole or in
part at any time after the Distribution Date upon surrender of the Right Certificate, with the form of election to purchase on the reverse side thereof duly executed, to the Rights Agent at the principal office of the Rights Agent, together with
payment of the Purchase Price for each one one-hundredth of a Preferred Share as to which the Rights are exercised, at or prior to the earliest of (i) the close of business on March 26, 2007, (ii) the time at which the Rights are
redeemed as provided in Section 23 hereof (the “Redemption Date”), or (iii) the time at which such Rights are exchanged as provided in Section 24 hereof. The Purchase Price for each one one-hundredth of a Preferred Share
purchasable pursuant to the exercise of a Right shall initially be $68.00, and shall be subject to adjustment from time to time as provided in Section 11 or 13 hereof and shall be payable in lawful money of the United States of America in
accordance with paragraph (c) below.” 
 3. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and each of such
counterparts shall for all purposes be deemed to be an original, and all such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same instrument. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of the day and
year first above written. 
  

									
	 	 	 	 	 	 	THE STRIDE RITE CORPORATION
					
	Attest:	 	 /s/ Charles W. Redepenning
  
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Frank A. Caruso
  

	Name:	 	Charles W. Redepenning	 		 	Name:	 	Frank A. Caruso
		 		 		 	Title:	 	CFO

  

									
	 	 	 	 	 	 	COMPUTERSHARE TRUST COMPANY, N.A.
					
	Attest:	 	 /s/ Joshua McGinn
  
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Dennis V. Moccia
  

	Name:	 	Joshua McGinn	 		 	Name:	 	Dennis V. Moccia
		 	Senior Relationship Manager	 		 	Title:	 	Managing Director
§ 5.51 Eligibility. ( a ) Authorizations for stations in the Experimental Radio Service will be issued only to persons qualified to conduct the types of operations permitted in § 5.3, including testing laboratories recognized by the Commission for radio frequency device testing.
( b ) No foreign government or representative thereof is eligible to hold a station license in the Experimental Radio Service.
#### § 51.205 Dialing parity: General.

A local exchange carrier (LEC) shall provide local dialing parity to competing providers of telephone exchange service, with no unreasonable dialing delays. Dialing parity shall be provided for originating telecommunications services that require dialing to route a call.

[83 FR 42052, Aug. 20, 2018]
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

Anoka Air, Inc., et al 

Complainant, 

v. FAADocketNo.16-11-12 

Metropolitan Airports Commission 

Respondent. 

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted 

Airport Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CFR, part 16. Pursuant to 14 CFR, part 16, subpart B, 

the date by which the Director's Determination will be issued in this matter is hereby 

extended to October 14, 2016 

An extension of time is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in 

this case. 

illis, Director 

Airpo Compliance and 

Management Analysis 

ATE 1 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on August 22,2016, I caused to be placed in the United States 

mail (first class mail, postage paid) a true copy of the Notice of Extension of Time 

addressed to: 

Counsel for Complainant: 

Steven M. Taber, Esq. 

Taber Law Group 

13 Atlanta 

Irvine, CA 92620 

Facsimile: (714) 707-4282 

Counsel for Respondent: 

Thomas W. Anderson, Esq. 

General Counsel 

Metropolitan Airports Commission 

6040 28th A venue South 

Minneapolis, MN 55450 

Facsimile: (612) 726-5306 

Pablo 0. Niiesch, Esq. 

Spiegel & McDiannid LLP 

1333 New Hampshire Ave., NW 

Washington, DC 20036 

Facsimile: (202) 393-2866 

Copy to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

FAA Office of Airport Compliance and Management Analysis, AC0-1 00 

audia Roberts 

Office of Airport Compliance 

and Management Analysis
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the Company's 10-K and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             67
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   2,905
<ALLOWANCES>                                       31
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0
<PP&E>                                              5
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  3,980
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               0
<BONDS>                                         2,424
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                        681
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    3,980
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  439
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     104
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   21
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   29
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                188
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    96
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                61
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                       61
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 2.935 Electronic labeling of radiofrequency devices. ( a ) Any radiofrequency device equipped with an integrated electronic display screen, or a radiofrequency device without an integrated screen that can only operate in conjunction with a device that has an electronic display screen, may display on the electronic display the FCC Identifier, any warning statements, or other information that the Commission's rules would otherwise require to be shown on a physical label attached to the device.
( b ) Devices displaying their FCC Identifier, warning statements, or other information electronically must make this information readily accessible on the electronic display. Users must be provided with prominent instructions on how to access the information in the operating instructions, inserts in packaging material, or other easily accessible format at the time of purchase. The access instructions may also be provided via the product-related Web site, if such a Web site exists; the packaging material must provide specific instructions on how to locate the Web site information, and a copy of these instructions must be included in the application for equipment certification.
( c ) Devices displaying their FCC Identifier, warning statements, or other information electronically must permit access to the information without requiring special codes, accessories or permissions and the access to this information must not require more than three steps from the device setting menu. The number of steps does not include those steps for use of screen locks, passcodes or similar security protection designed to control overall device access.
( d ) The electronically displayed FCC Identifier, warning statements, or other information must be displayed electronically in a manner that is clearly legible without the aid of magnification;
( e ) The necessary label information must be programmed by the responsible party and must be secured in such a manner that third-parties cannot modify it.
( f ) Devices displaying their FCC Identifier, warning statements, or other information electronically must also be labeled, either on the device or its packaging, with the FCC Identifier or other information (such as a model number and identification of a Web page that hosts the relevant regulatory information) that permits the devices to be identified at the time of importation, marketing, and sales as complying with the FCC's equipment authorization requirements. Devices can be labeled with a stick-on label, printing on the packaging, a label on a protective bag, or by similar means. Any removable label shall be of a type intended to survive normal shipping and handling and must only be removed by the customer after purchase.
[82 FR 50827, Nov. 2, 2017]