alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1 D 2 0 2 3

- 123 0

_____________________________
L UIS F ERNANDO O RTIZ J R ., Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Jackson County

. Ana Maria Garcia , Judge

.

May 20, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.

L EWIS , M.K. T HOMAS , and N ORDBY , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Jasmine Russell Dixon, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Advanced ID Corporation (the "Company"),
hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                 /s/ Dan Finch
                                 ----------------------
                                 Dan Finch
                                 Chief Executive Officer

April 17, 2007


                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Advanced ID Corporation (the "Company"),
hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                 /s/ Seymour Kazimirski
                                 ----------------------
                                 Seymour Kazimirski
                                 Interim Chief Financial Officer

April 17, 2007
#### MICHAEL A. SHEHAN (Substituted for WILLIAM G. FISHER), Respondent, *v.*PATRICK MAHAR, JAMES W. PAGE and H. B. FREEMAN, Appellants.

*ilecekier*— *of property levied upon under an attachment.*

Appeal from an order appointing a receiver.

This action was brought by William S. Fisher, September 12, 1878. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff and defendant *130Mahar are the owners in common of a certain trotting horse known as “Billy O’Neil,” of the value of $1,000. That the horse was purchased by plaintiff and Mahar about September, 1874 ; that the plaintiff has for upwards of a year, by the consent of Mahar, managed and controlled the horse and incurred expenses in the transportation, keeping, etc., of said horse amounting to $354; that the plaintiff, while the horse was in his possession, made an agreement with the defendant, James *W.*Page, of which a copy is made a part of the complaint, by which Page was entitled to possession of the horse, and to one-half his net earnings; that the defendant Mahar wrongfully took the horse from the possession of Page without plaintiff’s consent and removed him from, Albany to Montgomery county ; that Page had brought an action against plaintiff and defendant Mahar in which a warrant of attachment had issued under which, the sheriff of Montgomery county had levied on the horse, and the horse was then in the custody of the sheriff; that the sheriff' had caused the horse to be appraised at a sum far below its actual value, namely at the sum of $200 ; that the defendant Mahar resides in the State of Illinois, is entirely insolvent and without means ; that the defendant Freeman claims to be the owner of the horse under a purchase from Mahar, but such claim is fictitious and unfounded; that the defendants Freeman and Mahar are acting in collusion, and that there is danger that by said low and insufficient appraisal the defendant Mahar will be able to and will take the horse again into his own possession, and by some pretended sale, or by removing the horse beyond the jurisdiction of the court, deprive the plaintiff of his property. The relief prayed for includes an injunction, the appointment of a receiver, an accounting, a sale of the horse, and a distribution of the proceeds among the parties entitled.

The court at General Term said: “The order appointing a receiver of this property was proper under the decision of this court in *Andrews*v. *Betts*(8 Hun, 322). That case seems to have been overlooked by the counsel for the respective parties. It is, however, an authority sustaining the present action and justifying the appointment of a receiver. The final judgment and distribution of the proceeds of the sale of the horse will be such, as shall protect the rights of all the parties to the action.”

*131
      *F. Fish,*for the appellants. *Matthew Hale,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Boardman, J.

Present — Learned, P. J., Bocees and Boabdman, JJ.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements.
#### UNITED STATES v. GOGGIN.

No. 12578.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Feb. 12, 1951.

*531Theron Lamar Caudle, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slack, A. F. Prescott, Fred E. Youngman, Louise Foster, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., Ernest A. Tolin, U.S. Atty., E. H. Mitchell, Edward R. McHale, Assts., and Eugene Harpole, Sp. Atty., B.I.R., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Bates S. Himes, Los Angeles, Cal., Roy D. Reese, San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before HEALY, Circuit Judge, and FEE and GOODMAN, District Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The government stipulated all the facts of this case in writing with the Trustee, who is appellee here. The Referee made findings which included the facts so established and no others. His order, based upon these findings of fact, concluded the major issues of law in favor of the government. However, there was a holding on the stipulated fact that the government was not entitled to interest on the tax claim after the date of adjudication. Upon a review of the order, the District Court held, based upon the same stipulated facts, that this interest was not recoverable, citing City of New York v. Saper, Trustee, 336 U.S. 328, 69 S.Ct. 554, 93 L.Ed. 710.

A motion has been made here by appellant to bring in certain documents claimed to have been part of the record in the bankruptcy case, which were not urged before the Referee, not referred to in the stipulation or the findings of fact or the Referee’s certificate upon review. The District Court did not have these documents before it when it affirmed the order of the Referee. The motion is denied. Heath v. Helmick, 9 Cir., 173 F.2d 156. See Speer v. Rural Special School District No. 50, 8 Cir., 100 F.2d 202, 206.

Based upon the original stipulation, as interpreted by the District Court, United States v. Sampsell, 9 Cir., 153 F.2d 731, is not applicable here. The order denying interest to the government after adjudication is therefore affirmed.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8
(Nos. 333-06297, 333-43296, 333-56284, 333-59379, 333-62130, 333-105140, 333-106409, 333-120932,
333-135399, and 333-151488) of ArthroCare Corporation of our report dated March 15, 2010 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Austin, TX
March 15, 2010

---



QuickLinks
327P15

#### In the Matter of P.S.

1. Respondent-Mother’s Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*(COA15-18)

1. Denied

2. Respondent-Mother’s Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Order of District Court of Alleghany County

2. Dismissed
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.3001 Definitions. For purposes of this subpart: ( a ) The term *agency* means the Federal Communications Commission.
( b ) The term *gift* means any unconditional gift, donation or bequest of real, personal and other property (including voluntary and uncompensated services as authorized under 5 U.S.C. 3109).
( c ) The terms *agency ethics official, designated agency ethics official, employee, market value, person,* and *prohibited source,* have the same meaning as found in 5 CFR 2635.102, 2635.203.
<PAGE>
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report of Celadon Group, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Stephen
Russell, Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
   the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
   respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



                                             /s/ Stephen Russell
                                             -------------------
                                                 Stephen Russell
                               Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer


September 30, 2002
#### § 69.414 Lifeline assistance expenses.

Expenses allocated to the interstate jurisdiction pursuant to § 36.741 shall be assigned to the Carrier Common Line element until March 31, 1989. Beginning April 1, 1989, such expenses shall be assigned to the Lifeline Assistance element.
§ 73.57 Remote reading antenna and common point ammeters. Remote reading antenna and common point ammeters may be used without further authority according to the following conditions: ( a ) Remote reading antenna or common point ammeters may be provided by: ( 1 ) Inserting second radio frequency current sensing device directly in the antenna circuit with remote leads to the indicating instruments.
( 2 ) Inductive coupling to radio frequency current sensing device for providing direct current to indicating instrument.
( 3 ) Capacity coupling to radio frequency current sensing device for providing direct current to indicating instrument.
( 4 ) Current transformer connected to radio frequency current sensing device for providing direct current to indicating instrument.
( 5 ) Using transmission line current meter at transmitter as remote reading ammeter. See paragraph (c) of this section.
( 6 ) Using the indications of the antenna (phase) monitor, provided that when the monitor is used to obtain remote reading indication of non-directional antenna base current, the monitor calibration can be independently made and maintained for each mode of operation.
( b ) Devices used for obtaining remote reading antenna or common point current indications, except antenna monitor coupling elements, shall be located at the same point as, but below (transmitter side) the associated main ammeter.
( c ) In the case of shunt-excited antennas, the transmission line current meter at the transmitter may be considered as the remote antenna ammeter provided the transmission line is terminated directly into the excitation circuit feed line, which shall employ series tuning only (no shunt circuits of any type shall be employed) and insofar as practicable, the type and scale of the transmission line meter should be the same as those of the excitation circuit feed line meter (meter in slant wire feed line or equivalent).
( d ) Each remote reading ammeter shall be accurate to within 2 percent of the value read on its corresponding regular ammeter.
( e ) All remote reading ammeters shall conform with the specifications for regular antenna ammeters.
( f ) Meters with arbitrary scale divisions may be used provided that calibration charts or curves are provided at the transmitter control point showing the relationship between the arbitrary scales and the reading of the main meters.
( g ) If a malfunction affects the remote reading indicators of the antenna or common point ammeter, the operating power may be determined by a method using alternative procedures as described in § 73.51.
[41 FR 36817, Sept. 1, 1976, as amended at 48 FR 38477, Aug. 24, 1983; 49 FR 49850, Dec. 24, 1984; 50 FR 32416, Aug. 12, 1985; 60 FR 55480, Nov. 1, 1995]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
          This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from
          Pacific Forest Corporation  December 31, 1996 financial statements and
          is  qualified   in  its  entirety  by  reference  to  such   financial
          statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000866678
<NAME>                        Pacific Forest
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996

<CASH>                                         39
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               39
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 39
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,225
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,100
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,286)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   39
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               51,186
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (51,186)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (51,186)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (51,186)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.05)
        


</TABLE>
No. 11-9918.

#### Singleton *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# 13-50635 USA v. Rodriguez

SILVERMAN, BEA and CHRISTEN

null

954.53955

eng - iTunPGAP0��

eng - iTunNORM 000007F9 00000000 0000A22D 00000000 000BCA78 00000000 0000840D 00000000 00066EF0 00000000�

eng - iTunSMPB 00000000 00000210 00000630 0000000001411800 00000000 003A3DCC 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000�
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NetFabric Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Vasan
Thatham, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

August 21, 2006

                                /s/ Vasan Thatham
                                --------------------------------
                                Name: Vasan Thatham
                                Title: Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to NetFabric Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by NetFabric Holdings,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003



I, Lawrence H. Hayward, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that the Annual
Report of Leslies Poolmart, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 1, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Leslies Poolmart, Inc.



Dated: December 20, 2005



By:

/s/ Lawrence H. HaywardName:

Lawrence H. HaywardTitle:

President andChief Executive Officer




I, Steven L. Ortega, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that the Annual Report of Leslies Poolmart, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 1, 2005 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations
of Leslies Poolmart, Inc.



Dated:
December 20, 2005



By:

/s/ Steven L. OrtegaName:

Steven L. OrtegaTitle:

Executive Vice-President andChief Financial Officer




66
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350


In connection with the Annual Report of ION Geophysical Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2015 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, R. Brian Hanson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:


|   |                                                                                                                                      
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: February 12, 2016/s/ R. Brian HansonR. Brian HansonPresident and Chief Executive Officer
No. 11-16.

#### Realcomp II, Ltd. *v.*Federal Trade Commission.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 10-11145.

#### Davis *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
No. 11-5435.

#### Tisdale *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 463

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow farmers who reside

in disaster areas or who have a substantial drop in farm income to

make penalty-free withdrawals from individual retirement accounts and

from certain other retirement plans.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1993

Mr. KOPETSKI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow farmers who reside in disaster areas or who have a substantial drop in farm income to make penalty-free withdrawals from individual retirement accounts and from certain

other retirement plans.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 463 IH

1 SECTION 1. PENALTY-FREE WITHDRAWALS FROM CERTAIN

2 RETIREMENT PLANS FOR FARMERS WHO RE3 SIDE IN DISASTER AREAS OR WHO HAVE A

4 SUBSTANTIAL DROP IN FARM INCOME.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 72(t) of

6 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to exceptions)

7 is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new

8 subparagraph:

9 ‘‘(D) DISTRIBUTIONS TO FARMERS RESID10 ING IN DISASTER OR SUFFERING A SUBSTAN11 TIAL DECLINE IN FARM INCOME.—Any distribu12 tion to an eligible farmer (as defined in para13 graph (5)) from—

14 ‘‘(i) an individual retirement account,

15 or

16 ‘‘(ii) a qualified retirement plan which

17 provides contributions or benefits for em18 ployees some or all of whom are owner-em19 ployees (as defined in section 401(c)(3)).’’

20 (b) ELIGIBLE FARMER.—Subsection (t) of section 72

21 of such Code is amended by redesignating paragraph (5)

22 as paragraph (6) and by inserting after paragraph (4) the

23 following new paragraph:

24 ‘‘(5) ELIGIBLE FARMER.—For purposes of

25 paragraph (2)(D)—
3

•HR 463 IH

1 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘eligible

2 farmer’ means any individual who is engaged in

3 the trade or business of farming if—

4 ‘‘(i) such individual resides, and such

5 individual’s farm is located, in an area de6 clared to be a disaster area by the chief ex7 ecutive of the State in which such area is

8 located, or

9 ‘‘(ii) such individual’s farm income for

10 the taxable year during which the distribu11 tion is made is 65 percent or less of the

12 average of such individual’s farm income

13 for the 5 preceding taxable years.

14 ‘‘(B) DISASTER DISTRIBUTIONS MUST BE

15 MADE WITHIN 2 YEARS.—Paragraph (2)(D)

16 shall not apply to a distribution by reason of

17 subparagraph (A)(i) of this paragraph unless

18 the distribution is made not more than 2 years

19 after the date of the disaster declaration.’’

20 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

21 this section shall apply to distributions after the date of

22 the enactment of this Act.

Æ
No. 11-9567.

#### Reynolds *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-10028.

#### Scanlan *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.