alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          17,349
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,215
<ALLOWANCES>                                       300
<INVENTORY>                                      1,563
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,425
<PP&E>                                           1,962
<DEPRECIATION>                                     519
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  38,331
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,369
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            70
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,892
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    38,331
<SALES>                                         25,925
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,925
<CGS>                                            9,392
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,441
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    80
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,951
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,141
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,752
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,389
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,803)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (414)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)
        
<FN>
Amounts inapplicable or not disclosed as a separate line on the Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets or Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
are reported as 0 herein.
</FN>

</TABLE>
# Watch CIC Professor George Trawick Present at AUSA Cyber Pavilion

/ Published Oct. 18, 2017
#### § 73.3549 Requests for extension of time to operate without required monitors, indicating instruments, and EAS encoders and decoders.

Requests for extension of authority to operate without required monitors, transmission system indicating instruments, or encoders and decoders for monitoring and generating the EAS codes and Attention Signal should be made to the FCC by electronically filing an STA via LMS. Such requests must contain information as to when and what steps were taken to repair or replace the defective equipment and a brief description of the alternative procedures being used while the equipment is out of service.

[89 FR 7260, Feb. 1, 2024]
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4504 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4504

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
  To amend the Atlantic Striped Bass Conservation Act, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as ``The Striped Bass Act of 1994''.

   TITLE I--AMENDMENTS TO THE ATLANTIC STRIPED BASS CONSERVATION ACT

SECTION 101. ATLANTIC STRIPED BASS CONSERVATION ACT AMENDMENTS.

    Section 7(a) of the Atlantic Striped Bass Conservation Act is 
amended by striking ``1986'' and all that follows through ``1994'', and 
inserting in its place ``1995 and 1996''.

SEC. 102. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN PREPARATION OF PLANS AND AMENDMENTS 
              TO PLANS FOR ATLANTIC STRIPED BASS.

    Section 10 of the Atlantic Striped Bass Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 
1851 note) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 10. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN PREPARATION OF PLANS AND AMENDMENTS 
              TO PLANS FOR ATLANTIC STRIPED BASS.

    ``Within 6 months after the date of the enactment of the Striped 
Bass Act of 1994, the Commission shall establish standards and 
procedures to ensure that the Commission provides an adequate 
opportunity for public participation in the preparation of any plan for 
the management of Atlantic striped bass and any amendment to a plan 
(including any amendment to the Interstate Fisheries Management Plan 
for Striped Bass, dated October 1, 1981), including public hearings and 
procedures for the submission of written comments to the Commission.''.

      TITLE II--AMENDMENTS TO THE ANADROMOUS FISH CONSERVATION ACT

SEC. 201. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 7(d) of the Anadromous Fish Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 
757g(d)) is amended by striking ``1991, 1992, 1993, and 1994.'' and 
inserting ``1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 12, 1994.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.






103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4504

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend the Atlantic Striped Bass Conservation Act, and for other 
                               purposes.`
No. 11-10075.

#### Thuan Huy Ha *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-5236.

#### Pacheco *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 27.303 Upper 700 MHz commercial and public safety coordination zone. ( a ) *General.* CMRS operators are required, prior to commencing operations on fixed or base station transmitters on the 776-787 MHz band that are located within 500 meters of existing or planned public safety base station receivers, to submit a description of their proposed facility to a Commission-approved public safety coordinator. ( i ) The frequency or frequencies on which the facility will operate;
( ii ) Antenna location and height;
( iii ) Type of emission;
( iv ) Effective radiated power;
( v ) A description of the area served and the operator's name. (2) It is the CMRS operator's responsibility to determine whether referral is required for stations constructed in its area of license. Public safety base stations are considered “planned” when public safety operators have notified, or initiated coordination with, a Commission-approved public safety coordinator.
( b ) CMRS operators must wait at least 10 business days after submission of the required description before commencing operations on the referenced facility, or implementing modifications to an existing facility.
( c ) The potential for harmful interference between the CMRS and public safety facilities will be evaluated by the public safety coordinator. (1) With regard to existing public safety facilities, the coordinator's determination to disapprove a proposed CMRS facility (or modification) to be located within 500 meters of the public safety facilities will be presumed correct, but the CMRS operator may seek Commission review of such determinations. Pending Commission review, the CMRS operator will not activate the facility or implement proposed modifications. (2) With regard to proposed public safety facilities, the coordinator's determination to disapprove a proposed CMRS facility (or modification) to be located within 500 meters of the public safety facilities will be presumed correct, but the CMRS operator may seek Commission review and, pending completion of review, operate the facility during construction of the public safety facilities. If coordination or Commission review has not been completed when the public safety facilities are ready to operate, the CMRS operator must cease operations pending completion of coordination or Commission review. Such interim operation of the CMRS facility within the coordination zone (or implementation of modifications) will not be relied on by the Commission in its subsequent review and determination of measures necessary to control interference, including relocation or modification of the CMRS facility.
( d ) If, in the event of harmful interference between facilities located within 500 meters proximity, the parties are unable, with the involvement of the coordinator, to resolve the problem by mutually satisfactory arrangements, the Commission may impose restrictions on the operations of any of the parties involved.
[67 FR 49245, July 30, 2002, as amended at 72 FR 48853, Aug. 24, 2007; 79 FR 599, Jan. 6, 2014]
----

Corrigendum to Council Directive 89/682/EEC of 21 December 1989 amending Directive 86/298/EEC on rear-mounted roll-over protection structures of narrow-track wheeled agricultural and forestry tractors

(Official Journal of the European Communities L 398 of 30 December 1989)

On page 30, Article 1, point 4:

for:

read:

----
§ 76.1611 Political cable rates and classes of time. If a system permits a candidate to use its cablecast facilities, the system shall disclose to all candidates information about rates, terms, conditions and all value-enhancing discount privileges offered to commercial advertisers. Systems may use reasonable discretion in making the disclosure; provided, however, that the disclosure includes, at a minimum, the following information: ( a ) A description and definition of each class of time available to commercial advertisers sufficiently complete enough to allow candidates to identify and understand what specific attributes differentiate each class;
( b ) A description of the lowest unit charge and related privileges (such as priorities against preemption and make goods prior to specific deadlines) for each class of time offered to commercial advertisers;
( c ) A description of the system's method of selling preemptible time based upon advertiser demand, commonly known as the “current selling level,” with the stipulation that candidates will be able to purchase at these demand-generated rates in the same manner as commercial advertisers;
( d ) An approximation of the likelihood of preemption for each kind of preemptible time; and
( e ) An explanation of the system's sales practices, if any, that are based on audience delivery, with the stipulation that candidates will be able to purchase this kind of time, if available to commercial advertisers.
#### § 73.1735 AM station operation pre-sunrise and post-sunset.

Certain classes of AM stations are eligible to operate pre-sunrise and/or post-sunset for specified periods with facilities other than those specified on their basic instruments of authorization. Such pre-sunrise and post-sunset operation is authorized pursuant to the provisions of § 73.99 of the Rules.

[49 FR 41249, Oct. 22, 1984]
# lnventoryExpertServi 

# ce

-- A dlvision of the AmerIcan Chemical Socioty Phone: 800-631-1884, 614-447-3870 Fax: 614-447-3747 E-rnail: answersQcas.org Web: www.cas.org/products/other-cas-products/client-services! 

## IN'VENTORY EXPERT SERVICE REPORT IES Order Number: 376784-1 Registry Number.: 1539128-27-2 CA Yndex Naine: Phenol, styrenated, reaction product;s with polyethylene glycol and 2-[(2-propen -1-yloxy) me thyll oxirane

Please print the above CA Index Name on the appropriate page ofyour PMN.

❑ if this box is checked, CAS has made correction(s) marked in red to your IES order. Please make the same corrections to your PMN before submitting it to the EPA. CAS - 2540 Olentangy River Road - P.O. Box 3343 - Columbus, OH 43210-0334 - USA
17 March 2016

437P15-2

#### Herman V. Tate v. North Carolina Department of Public Safety

Pit’s .Pro *Se*Motion to Reconsider Dismissal of Discretionary Review

Dismissed
# **EXHIBIT31.2        Section 302Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

****

**I, Ryan M. Glista,Chief Financial Officer, Commercial National Financial Corporationcertify that:**

****

I have reviewed this Amendment No.1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Commercial NationalFinancial Corporation;

****

Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;

****

Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

****

The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant andwe have:

****

designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls or procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

****

evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and

****

disclosed in this report any changein the registrant's internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;and

****

****

The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and to the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

****

all significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controlover financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and

****

any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financialinformation.

****

****
| Date:   May 21,2004 | By: | /s/ Ryan M.Glista      |
|--------------------------|-----|------------------------|
|                          |     | Ryan M. Glista         |
|                          |     | Chief FinancialOfficer |
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4774 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4774

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
               coastwise trade for the vessel GIBRALTAR.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 14, 1994

  Mr. Bonior introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
               coastwise trade for the vessel GIBRALTAR.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the 
Act of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106 of title 
46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue a 
certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for 
employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel GIBRALTAR (United 
States official number 668634).
                                 <all>
```
# IMPORTANT!  Students shouldn't make non-refundable reservations until course confirmation

/ Published Jan. 29, 2016

IMPORTANT REMINDER FOR STUDENTS: Please note that the college reserves confirmation of course offerings until we have sufficient students enrollled in each class. Students should NOT book non-refundable plane tickets or hotel reservations until their course is confirmed. Contact the Office of Student Services at iCollegeOSS@ndu.edu or 202-685-6300 with any questions.
Appendix B

Question Refinement Mailing

	The Johns Hopkins University Evidence-based Practice Center will be developing an Evidence Report on Treatment of Coexisting Glaucoma and Cataract for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.  We are soliciting input from experts with varied perspectives on key questions regarding management of coexisting cataract and glaucoma. 

	PLEASE ASSIST US IN IDENTIFYING, FROM YOUR PERSPECTIVE AS _________________, WHAT ARE THE MOST IMPORTANT QUESTIONS THAT SHOULD BE ADDRESSED. 

	Please return your form to Dr. Lisa Lubomski at (410) 614-9651 (fax), by December 13th.  Should you have any questions, please call us at (410) 614-4037 or e-mail (llubomski@jhmi.edu).

	Please read the following eight questions regarding treatment of coexisting glaucoma and cataract and rank each question below as follows: (1) crucial, (2) desirable, or (3) unimportant, for in- depth examination in our study.  Please write in the space provided any other questions that you think are particularly relevant or controversial.

	Possible Questions		Rank	Comments

1.	What is the effect of glaucoma surgery (i.e., filtration surgery) upon the development and progression of cataract?		

2.	What is the effect of cataract surgery upon short and long-term intraocular pressure control in open angle glaucoma patients?		

3.	What are the risks and benefits of the alternative surgical techniques for operating on eyes with both cataract and glaucoma:		

	a) Staged procedure versus combined?

	b) With anti-fibrosis agent or without anti-              fibrosis agent?

	c) Single site for both operations or two sites?

	d) Trabeculectomy versus endoscopic laser              versus deep sclerectomy/viscocanulostomy?

	e) Nuclear expression or phacoemulsification?

(OTHER)

How might your organization use an evidence report on Treatment of Coexisting Glaucoma and Cataract?  Check all that apply

		☐	Would use report to facilitate development of a new practice guideline on surgical treatment of patients with coexisting glaucoma and cataract.

		☐	Would use report to assess the appropriateness of your organization’s existing guidelines on management of patients with coexisting glaucoma and cataract.

		☐	Would use report to prepare educational materials for physicians.

		☐	Would use report to prepare educational materials for patients.

		☐	Other (please specify)                                                                      

		☐	Other (please specify)                                                                      

Other Comments?                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

Signature of person completing form: ______________________________________________
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                     Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                       ----------------------------------


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-66107 and 333-37837) of our report dated January
27, 1999, except as to the information presented in Note 19, for which the date
is February 26, 1999, on our audits of the consolidated statements of income and
comprehensive income, of shareholders' equity and of cash flows of GA Financial,
Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1998, which report is incorporated by
reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

March 27, 2001
No. 10-10855.

#### Sanchez *v.*Herndon, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Editorial Note on Part 36
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 74 FR 23956, May 22, 2009, 77 FR 30411, May 23, 2012, 82 FR 25538, June 2, 2017, and corrected at 83 FR 4153, Jan. 30, 2018. Nomenclature changes to part 36 also appear at 83 FR 63587, Dec. 11, 2018, and 84 FR 4360, Feb. 15, 2019.

§ 36.162 Intangible assets—Account 2690. ( a ) Intangible Assets, Account 2690 includes the costs of organizing and incorporating the company, franchises, patent rights, and other intangible property having a life of more than one year.
( b ) The amount included in this account is apportioned among the operations on the basis of the separation of the cost of Telecommunications Plant In Service, Account 2001, excluding the Intangible Assets, Account 2690.
§ 7.5 General Obligations. ( a ) Obligation of Manufacturers. ( 1 ) A manufacturer of telecommunications equipment or customer premises equipment covered by this part shall ensure that the equipment is designed, developed and fabricated so that the voicemail and interactive menu functions are accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities, if readily achievable;
( 2 ) Whenever the requirements of paragraph (a)(1) of this section are not readily achievable, the manufacturer shall ensure that the equipment is compatible with existing peripheral devices or specialized customer premises equipment commonly used by individuals with disabilities to achieve access, if readily achievable.
( b ) Obligation of Service Providers. ( 1 ) A provider of voicemail or interactive menu shall ensure that the service is accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities, if readily achievable.
( 2 ) Whenever the requirements of paragraph (b)(1) of this section are not readily achievable, the service provider shall ensure that the service is compatible with existing peripheral devices or specialized customer premises equipment commonly used by individuals with disabilities to achieve access, if readily achievable.
[64 FR 63255, Nov. 19, 1999, as amended at 88 FR 55584, Aug. 16, 2023]