alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Community Bank Corporation of America (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), I, John A. Stewart, Jr., Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |     |  |                                                                       
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 15, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ John A. Stewart, Jr.                                              
|                        |  |     |  | John A. Stewart, Jr., Senior VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32

             CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                   AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of DataLogic
International, Inc (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September
30, 2004 (the "Report"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his
capacity as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated:  November 19, 2004            By: /s/ Derek Nguyen
                                         Derek Nguyen
                                         CEO
                                         (Principal Executive Officer)

Dated:  November 19, 2004            By: /s/ Khanh Nguyen
                                         Khanh Nguyen
                                         President, COO and CFO
                                         (Principal Financial Officer)



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 42.10 Public availability of information concerning interexchange services. ( a ) A nondominant interexchange carrier (IXC) shall make available to any member of the public, in at least one location, during regular business hours, information concerning its current rates, terms and conditions for all of its international and interstate, domestic, interexchange services. Such information shall be made available in an easy to understand format and in a timely manner. Following an inquiry or complaint from the public concerning rates, terms and conditions for such services, a carrier shall specify that such information is available and the manner in which the public may obtain the information.
( b ) In addition, a nondominant IXC that maintains an Internet website shall make such rate and service information specified in paragraph (a) of this section available on-line at its Internet website in a timely and easily accessible manner, and shall update this information regularly.
[64 FR 19725, Apr. 22, 1999, as amended at 66 FR 16879, Mar. 28, 2001]
§ 11.34 Acceptability of the equipment. ( a ) An EAS Encoder used for generating the EAS codes and the Attention Signal must be Certified in accordance with the procedures in part 2, subpart J, of this chapter. The data and information submitted must show the capability of the equipment to meet the requirements of this part as well as the requirements contained in part 15 of this chapter for digital devices.
( b ) Decoders used for the detection of the EAS codes and receiving the Attention Signal must be Certified in accordance with the procedures in part 2, subpart J, of this chapter. The data and information submitted must show the capability of the equipment to meet the requirements of this part as well as the requirements contained in part 15 of this chapter for digital devices.
( c ) The functions of the EAS decoder, Attention Signal generator and receiver, and the EAS encoder specified in §§ 11.31, 11.32 and 11.33 may be combined and Certified as a single unit provided that the unit complies with all specifications in this rule section.
( d ) Manufacturers must include instructions and information on how to install, operate and program an EAS Encoder, EAS Decoder, or combined unit and a list of all State and county ANSI numbers with each unit sold or marketed in the U.S.
( e ) Waiver requests of the Certification requirements for EAS Encoders or EAS Decoders which are constructed for use by an EAS Participant, but are not offered for sale will be considered on an individual basis in accordance with part 1, subpart G, of this chapter.
( f ) Modifications to existing authorized EAS decoders, encoders or combined units necessary to implement the new EAS codes specified in § 11.31 and to implement the selective displaying and logging feature specified in § 11.33(a)(4) will be considered Class I permissive changes that do not require a new application for and grant of equipment certification under part 2, subpart J of this chapter.
( g ) All existing and new models of EAS encoders, decoders and combined units manufactured after August 1, 2003 must be capable of generating and detecting the new EAS codes specified in § 11.31 in order to be certified under part 2, subpart J of this chapter. All existing and new models of EAS decoders and combined units manufactured after August 1, 2003 must have the selective displaying and logging capability specified in § 11.33(a)(4) in order to be certified under part 2, subpart J of this chapter.
[59 FR 67092, Dec. 28, 1994, as amended at 60 FR 56000, Nov. 6, 1995; 67 FR 18510, Apr. 16, 2002; 70 FR 71034, Nov. 25, 2005; 77 FR 16703, Mar. 22, 2012]
No. 11-9091.

No. 11-9165.

No. 11-9327.

No. 11-9666.

#### In re Hien Anh Dao; In re Dunlap; In re Durschmidt; and In re Carter.

Petitions for writs of mandamus denied.
§ 301.220 Dispute Resolution. ( a ) *Meeting with parties.* In consideration of the proposal set forth in a request pursuant to either § 301.200(a)(4)(vi) or (b)(3)(vi) of or at another mutually convenient date, time, and place (including via teleconference or other electronics means), the Chair of the board established under this subpart shall call a meeting of the board to be held simultaneously with representatives of the parties to the dispute to discuss the dispute.
( b ) *Additional written submissions.* The parties to the dispute shall provide the board with any additional written materials and documents as it may request. In cases where the dispute or an element thereof relates to the impact on the Federal Entity's national security, law enforcement, or public safety operations or functions, the board may request, and the Federal entity shall provide, additional written submissions concerning such impact.
( c ) *Assistance from Technical Panel.* A board established under this subpart may request technical assistance, as necessary, from the Technical Panel governed by subpart B of this part.
( d ) *Deadline for decision.* The board shall rule on the dispute not later than thirty (30) days from the date the request was received by the NTIA, unless the parties and the board all agree in writing, and subject to the approval of the Assistant Secretary, to extend this period for a specified number of days.
( e ) *Board decision.* The decision of a board established under this subpart shall: ( 1 ) Be in writing;
( 2 ) Be limited to determinations related to the execution, timing, or cost of the Transition Plan submitted by the Federal entity;
( 3 ) Be based only on the record before it, including the request; meeting(s) with the parties all at the same time; any additional written submissions requested by the board and served on the other party, including submissions from the Federal entity concerning the potential impact on its national security, law enforcement, or public safety operations or functions; input from the Technical Panel, and other matters and material for which it may take official notice;
( 4 ) Ensure that the decision does not have a detrimental impact on the Federal entity's operations or services that have national security, law enforcement, or public safety functions; and
( 5 ) Be final upon issuance.
( f ) *Recommendations.* A decision of the board may include recommendations for remedial or other corrective actions to the appropriate Federal agency with the legal authority to take such actions based on the board's findings.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4722

To authorize appropriations for activities under the Deep Seabed Hard

Mineral Resources Act for fiscal years 1995 through 1999.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 12, 1994

Mr. ORTIZ (for himself, Mr. FIELDS of Texas, Mr. WELDON, and Mr. YOUNG

of Alaska) introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to the

Committees on Merchant Marine and Fisheries, Natural Resources, and

Foreign Affairs

A BILL

To authorize appropriations for activities under the Deep

Seabed Hard Mineral Resources Act for fiscal years 1995

through 1999.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Deep Seabed Hard

5 Mineral Resources Reauthorization Act of 1994’’.

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

7 Section 310 of the Deep Seabed Hard Mineral Re8 sources Act (30 U.S.C. 1470) is amended—
2

•HR 4722 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ after ‘‘September 30,

2 1989,’’; and

3 (2) by inserting ‘‘, and $1,000,000 for each of

4 the fiscal years 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, and 1999’’

5 after ‘‘and 1994’’.

Æ
No. 11-5653.

#### Hernandez-Rojas *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4666 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4666

 To amend title 46, United States Code, to prohibit overhaul, repair, 
      and maintenance of Coast Guard vessels in foreign shipyards.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 28, 1994

Mr. Andrews of Maine introduced the following bill; which was referred 
           to the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 46, United States Code, to prohibit overhaul, repair, 
      and maintenance of Coast Guard vessels in foreign shipyards.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Shipbuilding Jobs 
Preservation Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON OVERHAUL, REPAIR, AND MAINTENANCE OF COAST GUARD 
              VESSELS IN FOREIGN SHIPYARDS.

    (a) Prohibition.--Chapter 5 of title 14, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 96. Prohibition on overhaul, repair, and maintenance of Coast 
              Guard vessels in foreign shipyards
    ``A Coast Guard vessel may not be overhauled, repaired, or 
maintained in any shipyard located outside the United States, except 
that this section does not apply to emergency repairs.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--Title 14, United States Code, is amended 
in the analysis at the beginning of chapter 5 by adding at the end the 
following:

``96. Prohibition on overhaul, repair, and maintenance of Coast Guard 
                            vessels in foreign shipyards.''.

                                 <all>
```
#### § 68.612 Labels on terminal equipment.

Terminal equipment certified by a Telecommunications Certification Body or approved by the Supplier's Declaration of Conformity under this part shall be labeled. The Administrative Council for Terminal Attachments shall establish appropriate labeling of terminal equipment. Labeling shall meet the requirements of the Federal Communications Commission and the U.S. Customs Service for their respective enforcement purposes, and of consumers for purposes of identifying the responsible party and model number.

[67 FR 57182, Sept. 9, 2002]
#### § 301.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to set forth procedures for the Technical Panel and Dispute Resolution Board as required pursuant to the National Telecommunications and Information Administration Organization Act (hereinafter “NTIA Organization Act”), as amended (47 U.S.C. 923(g)-(l) and 928).

[81 FR 3338, Jan. 21, 2016]
No. 11-8962.

#### Norwood *v.*Johnson et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 99.1


                FORM OF ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE


                           VW CREDIT, INC.



                 VOLKSWAGEN CREDIT AUTO MASTER TRUST



          The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of VW
Credit, Inc. ("VWCI"), as Servicer, pursuant to the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement dated as of February 29, 1996 (as amended and
supplemented, the "Agreement"), by and among Volkswagen Auto
Receivables Corporation, as seller, VWCI, as Servicer, and Citibank,
N.A., as trustee, do hereby certify that:

          1. VWCI is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the
     Agreement.

          2. The undersigned is a Servicing Officer and is duly
     authorized pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver
     this Certificate to the Trustee, any Agent and any Enhancement
     Providers.

          3. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the
     period from the initial Closing Date through the calendar year
     ended December 31, 1996 and of its performance under the
     Agreement was conducted under my supervision.

          4. Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of
     my knowledge, performed in all material respects all of its
     obligations under the agreement throughout such period and no
     default in the performance of such obligations has occurred or
     is continuing except as set forth in paragraph 5 below.

          5. None.



<PAGE>


          Capitalized terms used by not defined herein are used as
defined in the Agreement.


          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this
Certificate this 20th day of June, 1997.


                              /s/ Paul Sullivan 

                              Name: Paul Sullivan
                              Title: Director
712 P.2d 707

#### STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Terry G. GROVES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16023.

Court of Appeals of Idaho.

Dec. 23, 1985.

Lloyd J. Walker, Twin Falls for defendant-appellant.

Jim Jones, Atty. Gen., Lynn E. Thomas, Sol. Gen., Myrna A.I. Stahman, Deputy Atty. Gen., for plaintiff-respondent.

*1007PER CURIAM.

Terry Groves appeals from an order of the district court denying his motion to dismiss a prosecutor’s information charging him with operating a motor vehicle on May 30, 1983, while under the influence of intoxicants. Because Groves previously had received a misdemeanor conviction for another DUI incident, the instant crime was charged as a felony under I.C. § 49-1102(a), (e). This appeal from an interlocutory order is by permission of the Idaho Supreme Court pursuant to I.A.R. 12. Groves contends that on the date of the offense I.C. § 49-1102 had been repealed and that a replacement statute was not yet in effect. We disagree and affirm the order of the district court.

Idaho Code § 49-1102, as amended by 1980 Idaho Sess.Laws, ch. 165, § 1, p. 353, remained in effect until 1983, despite some intervening legislative attempts to amend the law. In 1983 the Idaho Legislature twice enacted changes in the law which included repeal of the existing § 49-1102. The first such repealer is contained in chapter 145, §§ 13-14 of the 1983 Idaho Session Laws, approved on April 6, 1983, after passage in the Regular Session of the Legislature. This bill contained no emergency clause. The enactment would have become effective as of July 1, 1983. I.C. § 67-510.

Before the effective date of chapter 145, the Legislature met again in Extraordinary Session. The Legislature reconsidered its recent enactment of Chapter 145 and repealed it. *See*1983 Idaho Extraord.Sess. Laws, ch. 3, p. 8. Chapter 3 also repealed I.C. § 49-1102 and replaced it with new sections designated 49-1102, -1102A and -1102B. This new legislation was approved May 19, 1983. The Act contained an “emergency declaration” but provided for an effective date of July 1, 1983.

We deem it clear beyond question that when the Legislature in a single bill provides for the repeal of a statute and for its replacement by a new statute, the repealer provisions have no effect until the effective date of the bill. In this case there was no “gap” between the repeal of § 49-1102 and the enactment of its replacement statute. Both events took effect simultaneously on July 1, 1983. The grounds Groves has asserted for dismissal of the charge against him are without merit. Therefore, we affirm the order of the district court and we remand the case for further proceedings.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 155 (Friday, August 11, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 46239]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6866]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[OR-4310-33]


Steens Mountain Advisory Council--Notice of Renewal

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of renewal of the Steens Mountain Advisory Council.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is published in accordance with Section 9(a)(2) of 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972, Public Law 92-463. Notice 
is hereby given that the Secretary of the Interior (Secretary) has 
renewed the Bureau of Land Management's Steens Mountain Advisory 
Council.
    The purpose of the Council will be to advise the Secretary with 
respect to the preparation and implementation of the Steens Mountain 
Cooperative Management and Protection Area Management Plan.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maggie Langlas, National Landscape 
Conservation System (171), Bureau of Land Management, 1620 L Street, 
NW., Room 301 LS, Washington DC 20236, telephone (202) 452-7787.

Certification Statement

    I hereby certify that the renewal of the Steens Mountain Advisory 
Council is necessary and in the public interest in connection with the 
Secretary's responsibilities to manage the lands, resources, and 
facilities administered by the Bureau of Land Management.

    Dated: August 4, 2006.
Dirk Kempthorne,
Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 06-6866 Filed 8-10-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DQ-M
Editorial Note on Part 36
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 74 FR 23956, May 22, 2009, 77 FR 30411, May 23, 2012, 82 FR 25538, June 2, 2017, and corrected at 83 FR 4153, Jan. 30, 2018. Nomenclature changes to part 36 also appear at 83 FR 63587, Dec. 11, 2018, and 84 FR 4360, Feb. 15, 2019.

§ 36.154 Exchange Line Cable and Wire Facilities (C&WF)—Category 1—apportionment procedures. ( a ) *Exchange Line C&WF—Category 1.* The first step in apportioning the cost of exchange line cable and wire facilities among the operations is the determination of an average cost per working loop. This average cost per working loop is determined by dividing the total cost of exchange line cable and wire Category 1 in the study area by the sum of the working loops described in subcategories listed below. The subcategories are: Subcategory 1.1—State Private Lines and State WATS Lines. This subcategory shall include all private lines and WATS lines carrying exclusively state traffic as well as private lines and WATS lines carrying both state and interstate traffic if the interstate traffic on the line involved constitutes ten percent or less of the total traffic on the line. Subcategory 1.2—Interstate private lines and interstate WATS lines. This subcategory shall include all private lines and WATS lines that carry exclusively interstate traffic as well as private lines and WATS lines carrying both state and interstate traffic if the interstate traffic on the line involved constitutes more than ten percent of the total traffic on the line. Subcategory 1.3—Subscriber or common lines that are jointly used for local exchange service and exchange access for state and interstate interexchange services.
( b ) The costs assigned to subcategories 1.1 and 1.2 shall be directly assigned to the appropriate jurisdiction.
( c ) Effective January 1, 1986, 25 percent of the costs assigned to subcategory 1.3 shall be allocated to the interstate jurisdiction.
( d ) - ( f ) [Reserved]
( g ) Effective July 1, 2001, through December 31, 2024, all study areas shall apportion Subcategory 1.3 Exchange Line C&WF among the jurisdictions as specified in paragraph (c) of this section. Direct assignment of subcategory Categories 1.1 and 1.2 Exchange Line C&WF to the jurisdictions shall be updated annually as specified in paragraph (b) of this section.
[52 FR 17229, May 6, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 33012, Aug. 29, 1988; 54 FR 31033, July 26, 1989; 66 FR 33206, June 21, 2001; 67 FR 17014, Apr. 9, 2002; 71 FR 65746, Nov. 9, 2006; 75 FR 30301, June 1, 2010; 76 FR 30841, May 27, 2011; 79 FR 36237, June 26, 2014; 83 FR 63585, Dec. 11, 2018]
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

TRIS PHARMA, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant

______________________

2023-1158

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

District of New Jersey in No. 2:20-cv-05212-KM-ESK, 

Judge Kevin McNulty.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. moves to voluntarily 

dismiss this appeal pursuant to Rule 42 of the Federal 

Rules of Appellate Procedure, stating that “[n]o costs are 

due” and that Tris Pharma, Inc. does not oppose the motion. Mot. at 1.

Upon consideration thereof, 

Case: 23-1158 Document: 5 Page: 1 Filed: 12/14/2022
2 TRIS PHARMA, INC. v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed.

(2) The parties shall bear their own costs.

December 14, 2022

 Date

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: December 14, 2022

Case: 23-1158 Document: 5 Page: 2 Filed: 12/14/2022