alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order filed September 11, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00583-CV

____________

ALPER KARAALI, Appellant

V.

PETROLEUM WHOLESALE, L.P., Appellee

On Appeal from the 333rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2011-44275

ORDER

On July 18, 2014, appellant filed a notice of appeal from a final judgment 

signed April 5, 2014. In response to this court’s notice, appellant has also filed a 

motion to extend time to file his notice of appeal. Appellant filed a pauper’s 

affidavit in the trial court with his notice of appeal. On August 1, 2014, appellant 

also filed an affidavit of inability to pay costs in this court. On August 4, 2014, 

appellant supplemented his request for a waiver of costs and fees with a copy of his 

2013 joint tax return, his wife’s W-2 form, and a premarital agreement stating each 
party’s income is separate property. 

The record has not been filed in this appeal, and both the district clerk’s 

office and the court reporters have stated appellant has not paid for preparation of 

the record. On August 27, 2014, one of the court reporters on this case notified this 

court that appellant’s request to proceed as a pauper was denied by the trial court 

on August 18, 2014. On August 28, 2014, appellant notified this court that at the 

hearing on the contest to appellant’s claim of indigence, the county’s counsel 

argued that appellant was underemployed. Appellant stated that the court gave the 

county time to produce case law supporting its position, and that he is still waiting 

on the trial court’s decision.

Therefore, it is unclear whether the trial court has ruled on appellant’s 

indigence claim. Accordingly, we issue the following order:

We order the Harris County District Clerk to file a partial clerk’s record with the 

clerk of this court on or before September 26, 2014. In order that this court may 

ascertain its jurisdiction over the appeal and appellant’s indigence claim, the partial 

clerk’s record shall contain (1) the judgment being appealed; (2) any motion for new 

trial, other post-judgment motion, or request for findings of fact and conclusions of law;

(3) the notice of appeal (4) appellant’s affidavit of indigence; (5) the contest(s) to the 

affidavit of indigence, if any; (6) the trial court’s order ruling on any contest; (7) any 

other documents pertaining to the claim of indigence and the contest(s) thereto. 

If any of the requested documents are not a part of the case file, the district clerk’s 

office is directed to file a certified statement that the document is not part of the case file.

PER CURIAM
1 Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-50280 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

KEITH RUSSELL JUDD,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. MO-98-CR-93-1

- - - - - - - - - -
May 12, 1999 Before DAVIS, DUHÉ and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 1

Keith Russell Judd appeals fr om the district court’s order

denying release pending his tria l on a two-count indictment

charging him with mailing threatening communications in an attempt
to extort money, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 876.

The district court’s decision, which effectively adopted the

reasoning of the magistrate judge who conducted the detention

hearing, is supported by evidence that indicates that no condition

or combination of conditions could be fashioned to sa feguard thecommunity and prevent the obstruction of justice. S ee 18 U.S.C.

§ 3142; United States v. Rueben
, 974 F.2d 580, 586 (5th Cir. 1992).

Accordingly, the district court’s detention order is AFFIRMED. All

outstanding motions filed by Judd are DENIED.

AFFIRMED; MOTIONS DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  FOR THE  YEAR  ENDED  MARCH  28,  1997  AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             MAR-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-28-1997
<CASH>                                             67,880   
<SECURITIES>                                            0   
<RECEIVABLES>                                   3,381,737   
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (146,960)   
<INVENTORY>                                    10,879,180   
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               14,865,472   
<PP&E>                                          2,566,497   
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,719,054)   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 19,772,382   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           6,644,652   
<BONDS>                                                 0   
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0   
<PREFERRED>                                             0   
<COMMON>                                           47,018   
<OTHER-SE>                                     13,080,712   
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   19,772,382   
<SALES>                                        33,471,918   
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               33,471,918   
<CGS>                                          26,638,622   
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  26,638,622   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                1,776,611   
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0   
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                399,469   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,544,038   
<INCOME-TAX>                                      533,379   
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             1,010,659   
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0   
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0   
<CHANGES>                                               0   
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,010,659   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         .22   
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .22   
                                             


</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 96-2833

___________

Edward K. Moses, Sr., *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

AT&T Communications, *

*

Appellee, *

*

Communications Workers of America, *

Local No. 6321, * Appeal from the United

States

* District Court for the

Defendant, * Western District of

Missouri.

*

Josie Bernal, Manager Operation *

 [UNPUBLISHED]

Service, *

*

Appellee, *

*

Phillip Ferrill, CWA Representative, *

*

Defendant, *

*

Michele Marion, immediate supervisor, *

*

Appellee. *
 The Honorable Joseph E. Stevens, Jr., United States District Judge for the Western 1

District of Missouri.

-2-

___________

 Submitted: July 23, 1997

 Filed: August 7,

1997

___________

Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and MURPHY,

Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Edward K. Moses, Sr., appeals the district court’s adverse grant of summary

1

judgment in his employment discrimination action. After de novo review, we conclude

the grant of summary judgment was proper. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH

CIRCUIT.
No. 10-10760.

#### Gallaher *v.*Southern Tube Form, LLC, et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 51.207 Local dialing parity.

A LEC shall permit telephone exchange service customers within a local calling area to dial the same number of digits to make a local telephone call notwithstanding the identity of the customer's or the called party's telecommunications service provider.

[61 FR 47349, Sept. 6, 1996]
# Michael Brody, J.D.

### Visiting Professor

### Program Assessment and Evaluation, Preparedness

### 

**Areas of Interest:**

Strategic logic, homeland security, program assessment and evaluation, preparedness 

Michael Brody has been working in homeland security policy development since 2004. He began his career in the Office of the Governor of Illinois where he was responsible for developing new policy directives for the State in homeland security. His work there led to his role as Director of the Illinois Homeland Security Market Development Bureau which provided grants and management consulting to innovative, high-tech homeland security companies based in Illinois. In 2008, Brody joined the Federal Emergency Management Agency serving as Reporting Section Chief for the National Preparedness Assessments Division, where he managed a team of analysts that produced reports for Congress on national, all-hazards preparedness including the National Preparedness Report. From 2012 to early 2014, Brody served as the Policy, Outreach and Communications Manager for the Homeland Security Information Network (HSIN), where he was responsible for stakeholder management and strategic messaging. Starting in the Spring of 2014, Brody worked as the Director for Policy, Architecture and Governance in the Information Sharing and Services Office of the OCIO – managing enterprise strategy development, new business engagements, communications and policy for a portfolio of programs that deliver vital IT mission support services across the homeland security enterprise. Most recently, since May, 2019, Mr. Brody serves as a Professor, representing DHS at the National Defense University and its College of Information and Cyberspace. He holds a Bachelor’s Degree from the University of Pennsylvania, 2000, magna cum laude, a Juris Doctorate from the University Of Illinois College of Law, 20003, cum laude, a Masters Degree in Security Studies from the Naval Post-Graduate School’s Center for Homeland Defense and Security, 2010, a Masters of Science Degree in National Security Strategy from the National War College, 2018, Distinguished Graduate (Top 10% of Class), and is DHS Senior Fellow.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-29-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1997
<CASH>                                           7,032
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,886
<ALLOWANCES>                                       240
<INVENTORY>                                     10,499
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,253
<PP&E>                                          15,117
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,518
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,802
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,869
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,998
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,663
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,802
<SALES>                                         90,453
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                90,453
<CGS>                                           83,442
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   90,015
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  18
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    706
<INCOME-TAX>                                       257
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                449
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       449
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05
        

</TABLE>
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4790

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse under construction in St. Louis, Missouri, as the ‘‘Thomas F. Eagleton

United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The United States courthouse under construction at

5 111 South Tenth Street in St. Louis, Missouri, shall be

6 known and designated as the ‘‘Thomas F. Eagleton

7 United States Courthouse’’.
2

HR 4790 EH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

4 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

5 to be a reference to the ‘‘Thomas F. Eagleton United

6 States Courthouse’’.

Passed the House of Representatives August 8,

1994.

Attest:

Clerk.

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4790

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse under

house’’.‘‘Thomas F. Eagleton United States Courtconstruction in St. Louis, Missouri, as the
Exhibit 23.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





The Board of Directors


Celadon Group, Inc.:





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Celadon Group, Inc. Registration Statement 333-14641 on Form S-8 pertaining to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan dated October 23, 1996, Registration Statement 333-42209 on Form S-8 pertaining to the Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan dated December 12, 1997, Registration Statements 333-42207 and 333-31164 on Form S-8 pertaining to the 1994 Stock Option plan dated December 12, 1997 and February 25, 2000, respectively, and Registration Statement 333-131227 on Form S-8 pertaining to the 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan dated January 23, 2006, of our report dated September 2, 2011, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Celadon Group, Inc. as of June 30, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2011, and related financial statement Schedule II, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2011, which report appears in the June 30, 2011, annual report on Form 10-K of Celadon Group, Inc.








/s/ KPMG, LLP





Indianapolis, Indiana


September 2, 2011






Back to Form 10-K
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Depomed, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carl A. Pelzel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| | Date: March 12, 2008                                                 
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/CARL A. PELZELCarl A. Pelzel President and Chief Executive Officer

---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4773 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4773

 To eliminate the exemption for the payment by Amtrak of certain costs 
       relating to pedestrian bridges over Amtrak rights-of-way.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 14, 1994

  Mr. Walker introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To eliminate the exemption for the payment by Amtrak of certain costs 
       relating to pedestrian bridges over Amtrak rights-of-way.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT.

    Section 24301(l)(1) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``, or that is required with respect to a pedestrian bridge 
which, as of July 1, 1994, crosses over a right-of-way owned by 
Amtrak'' after ``September 10, 1982''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2


                        CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report MIV Therapeutics, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended August 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Patrick
McGowan, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Patrick McGowan
----------------------------
Patrick McGowan
CFO
October 24, 2005


                                                                              21
§ 51.231 Provision of information on advanced services deployment. ( a ) An incumbent LEC must provide to requesting carriers that seek access to a loop or high frequency portion of the loop to provide advanced services: ( 1 ) Uses in determining which services can be deployed; and information with respect to the spectrum management procedures and policies that the incumbent LEC.
( 2 ) Information with respect to the rejection of the requesting carrier's provision of advanced services, together with the specific reason for the rejection; and
( 3 ) Information with respect to the number of loops using advanced services technology within the binder and type of technology deployed on those loops.
( b ) A requesting carrier that seeks access to a loop or a high frequency portion of a loop to provide advanced services must provide to the incumbent LEC information on the type of technology that the requesting carrier seeks to deploy. ( 1 ) Where the requesting carrier asserts that the technology it seeks to deploy fits within a generic power spectral density (PSD) mask, it also must provide Spectrum Class information for the technology.
( 2 ) Where a requesting carrier relies on a calculation-based approach to support deployment of a particular technology, it must provide the incumbent LEC with information on the speed and power at which the signal will be transmitted.
( c ) The requesting carrier also must provide the information required under paragraph (b) of this section when notifying the incumbent LEC of any proposed change in advanced services technology that the carrier uses on the loop.
[65 FR 1345, Jan. 10, 2000]
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of E-LOAN, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Mark E. Lefanowicz,
as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,
hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Mark E. Lefanowicz Mark E. Lefanowicz
Chief Executive Officer and President

March 25, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to E-LOAN, Inc. and will be retained by E-LOAN, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Exhibit (3)(i)(2)

    Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation
                      (4:1 stock conversion)

                   TOPCLICK INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                     CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                OF
                   CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION


     TopClick International, Inc., a corporation organized and existing
pursuant to the provisions and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware, does hereby certify:

      First:  That the sole member of the Board of Directors of this
corporation, by written consent of that member, adopted a resolution proposing
and declaring advisable the following amendment to the Certificate of
Incorporation of this corporation:

      RESOLVED, that the undersigned, as a member of the Board of Directors of
this corporation, has determined that it is in the best interests of this
corporation and its shareholders that the Certificate of Incorporation of this
corporation be amended to add thereto Article EIGHTH which shall specify the
following:

            EIGHTH:  On the addition of this article, each
            outstanding four (4) shares of this corporation's
            issued and outstanding $.001 par value common stock
            shall be, and hereby are, converted into one (1)
            share of this corporation's $.001 par value common
            stock.

      Second:  The holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares
of common stock of this corporation, which are the only shares entitled to a
vote regarding the amendments specified by this Certificate, approved such
amendment by consent.

      Third:  That the amendment specified by this Certificate was duly
adopted in accordance with the applicable provisions of Section 242 of Title 8
of the Delaware Code of 1953.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, TopClick International, Inc. has caused this
Certificate to be signed by Chris Lewis, its President, and Chris Lewis, its
Secretary, this 20th day of July, 2001.

                                    TopClick International, Inc.


                                    By:      /s/ Chris Lewis
                                        -----------------------------
                                       Chris Lewis, President and Secretary
#### § 27.501 746-758 MHz, 775-788 MHz, and 805-806 MHz bands subject to competitive bidding.

Mutually exclusive initial applications for licenses in the 746-758 MHz, 775-788 MHz, and 805-806 MHz bands are subject to competitive bidding. The general competitive bidding procedures set forth in part 1, subpart Q of this chapter will apply unless otherwise provided in this subpart.

[79 FR 600, Jan. 6, 2014]
No. 11-8857.

#### Pyatt *v.*South Carolina.

Sup. Ct. S. C. Certiorari denied.