alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Online Admissions Process Now Available! 

/ Published Nov. 4, 2015
iCollege Online Admissions Process - now available for new and existing studentsAfter a technology upgrade at NDU, the iCollege is now using an online process for admissions with the Tk20 suite. In order to apply to any of the programs at the college, you will need to create an admissions account.  Go to: https://ndu.tk20.com/campustoolshighered/admissions1.do .  Below are the detailed steps, but please contact the iCollege Office of Student Services at iCollegeOSS@ndu.edu or 202-685-6300 with any questions.  **Create an Admissions Account****Create an Admissions Application****Return to a Saved Application****Recall a Submitted Application****Viewing Reviewed Admissions Applications**
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a)
 
 I, Kenneth J. Mahon, certify that:
 
 1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.; and
 
 2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
        statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
 
 Date:
          November 2, 2018 /s/KENNETH J. MAHONKenneth J. MahonPresident and Chief Executive Officer
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 796/2005

of 26 May 2005         

fixing the rates of the refunds applicable to certain milk products exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 15 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular Article 31(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The rates of the refunds applicable to the basic products listed in Annex A to Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000 and in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999, and exported in the form of goods listed in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 shall be fixed as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 27 May 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 May 2005.

For the Commission

Günter VERHEUGEN            

Vice-President

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

(2)OJ L 177, 15.7.2000, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 886/2004 (OJ L 168, 1.5.2004, p. 14).

(3)OJ L 350, 20.12.1997, p. 3. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 921/2004 (OJ L 163, 30.4.2004, p. 94).

----

ANNEX

Rates of the refunds applicable from 27 May 2005 to certain milk products exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty (1)

----

(1)  The rates set out in this Annex are not applicable to exports to Bulgaria, with effect from 1 October 2004, and to the goods listed in Tables I and II to Protocol No 2 the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation of 22 July 1972 exported to the Swiss Confederation or to the Principality of Liechtenstein with effect from 1 February 2005.

----
No. 11-5306.

#### Peng Thao *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**EXHIBIT 31.1****RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO**I, William C. Ulland, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of IKONICS Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.        Date:  August 14, 2007 /s/ William C. Ulland   William C. Ulland   Chairman, Chief Executive Officerand President
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

# AGENCY:

Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is hosting two public meetings to discuss the licensing process for the mixed oxide (MOX) fuel fabrication facility. One meeting will be held in Columbia, South Carolina, and the second meeting will be held in N. Augusta, South Carolina. The purpose of both meetings is to explain the NRC's role for MOX, describe the NRC's licensing process, describe opportunities for public participation during the licensing process, and to answer questions from meeting participants. 

# DATES:

The meetings are scheduled for Wednesday, July 12, 2000, (Columbia, South Carolina) and July 13, 2000, (N. Augusta, South Carolina). Each meeting will run from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. The meetings are open to the public. 

# ADDRESSES:

The Columbia, South Carolina, meeting will be held at the University of South Carolina's Capstone Conference Center, which is located at 900 Barnwell St., Columbia, South Carolina. Parking is available on the street (free after 6 p.m.), or in lots located immediately Northwest of the Capstone building, the southern corner at the intersection of Barnwell and Pendleton, or at the intersection of Pendleton and Barnwell. The lots are free after 5 p.m. 

The N. Augusta, South Carolina, meeting will be held at the N. Augusta Community Center. The N. Augusta Community Center is located at 495 Brookside Drive in N. Augusta, South Carolina. Parking is available adjacent to the building. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information regarding the meetings, contact Andrew Persinko, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, telephone (301) 415-6522 or e-mail axp1@nrc.gov. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 23rd day of June, 2000. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Michael Tokar, 

Acting Chief, Special Projects Branch, Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards. 

[FR Doc. 00-16898 Filed 7-3-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4547 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4547

    To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to exempt certain 
  educational enterprise employees from the minimum wage and overtime 
                  compensation provisions of such Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 8, 1994

   Mr. Pete Geren of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to exempt certain 
  educational enterprise employees from the minimum wage and overtime 
                  compensation provisions of such Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EDUCATIONAL ENTERPRISE EMPLOYEES.

    Section 13(a) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 
213(a)) is amended by striking the period at the end of paragraph (15) 
and inserting ``; or'' and by adding at the end the following:
            ``(16) any individual who is employed by an educational 
        enterprise, recognized as an independent school district by the 
        State in which it is located, to serve as a parent of children 
        who are enrolled at such enterprise and reside in residential 
        facilities of such enterprise, if such employee resides in the 
        enterprise's facilities, receives without cost board and 
        lodging from such enterprise, and is compensated at an annual 
        rate of not less than $6,900.''.

                                 <all>
```
1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 40-F of PolyMet Mining Corp. (“the Company”);
 
 2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.
The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the Company and have:
 
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b)  Designed such internal controls over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 
 (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the Annual Report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
 5.
The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date: April 20, 2017
/s/ Jonathan CherryName: Jonathan CherryTitle: Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
#### § 64.1001 Purpose.

This subpart is intended to ensure that only used and useful investments and expenses are recovered through regulated interstate rates pursuant to section 201(b) of the Communications Act as amended (the Act), 47 U.S.C. 201(b).
1

Danielle Lewis

From: Andrew Knapp <AndrewK@filtrasystems.com>

Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 9:30 AM

To: Mark Briggs

Cc: Danielle Lewis; Birgit Washington

Subject: RE: Book Price for the 1200 gpm Unit

Attachments: DL-A-080-30-A-150-080-1200-E-N.pdf

Mark, 

I’ve priced this filter housing out for you below. 

We do not keep the 10 micron filters in stock, but we can do that for you in the future. We sell them in boxes of 20, and 

the cost per cartridge is $7.50. 

VESSELS 

Model #DL-C-080-30-A-150-080-1200-E-N, eighty (80) cartridge housing. Fits standard 30” cartridges, 316 SS material, 8” flange 

inlet/outlet connections, rated for 150 psig. EPDM seals, davit lid. For 1200 gpm flow rate. 

Price: $18,445.00 each 

Delivery: Fourteen (14) to nineteen (19) weeks ARO 

http://www.filtrasystems.com/products/dl-series-industrial-cartridge-filters/ 

CARTRIDGES 

Cartridge Filter Product #FS-SP10-30-D (Super-Pure), Polypropylene material, rated at 10 Micron nominal, 2.5” diameter, 30” 

cartridge, DOE. 

Price of Box of (20) Twenty: $150.00 per box. 

Delivery: Fourteen (14) to nineteen (19) weeks ARO 

http://www.filtrasystems.com/products/super-pure-filter-cartridges/

Payment: 100% prior to order (credit card preferred) 

Shipping: Ex Works, Farmington Hills, MI (freight charges are not included in price) 

Returns: All sales are final. Returns are subject to a review process, and a restocking fee is applied. 

To order please contact Birgit Washington at 248-427-9090 ext 143 

Regards, 

Andrew Knapp 

Applications Engineer 

Bag Filter Product Manager 

Filtra-Systems Company 

Office: 248-919-6119 

Cell: 248-962-8230 

www.filtrasystems.com

From: Mark Briggs [mailto:Mark.Briggs@erg.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 10:02 PM 

To: Andrew Knapp 

Cc: Danielle Lewis 

Subject: Book Price for the 1200 gpm Unit 
2

Andrew, 

Can you provide ERG with a book price for the 1200 gpm cartridge filer unit. From your catalog, the part 

number is DL-A-080-30-A-150-080-1200-E-N. Since the application is high chloride, we would like the costs for 

a unit manufactured with 316 stainless steel. 

Also, we would like an estimated cost for the 30", 10 micron filters. Since this unit holds 80 filters, if you could 

provide a per filter cost that would be great. 

Thanks Mark 

Mark Briggs 

Senior Environmental Engineer 

Eastern Research Group 

3400 Jack Morris Drive 

West Branch, MI 48661 

(989) 345 7595 

www.erg.com

Eastern Research Group, Inc. 

ERG provides multidisciplinary consulting services for public and private clients, including federal 

agencies, state governments, corporations, and universities 

Read more...
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to 10 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 1350 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the Quarterly Report of
Electronic Game Card, Inc. on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending June 30, 2006,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report") for electronic Game Card, Inc., (the "Company"), the undersigned
hereby certifies that:

1)    to the best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and

2)    to the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      result of operations of the Company.


August 16, 2006



/S/ LEE COLE
--------------------------------
    LEE COLE
    ACTING PRESIDENT AND ACTING
    CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
301 LUCERNE ROAD- HOMER CITY, PA 15748 PHONE 724-479-4252 o FAX 724-479-3592

September 24, 2009 Response Letter Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. 101 Lucerne Road Homer City, Pennsylvania 15748
Dear Sir/Madam: On June 17 th of 2009, a failure occurred in our iron during a frac operation, which resulted in the release of fluid. The preliminary results of the inspection pointed towards a mechanical failure of the iron elbow. Further review is being conducted by Halliburton in Duncan, OK. At the time of the failure, there was an initial burst of fluid that blew out over our trucks about 60 feet towards the connection of the lease road and the location. Fluid began to gather on location and started to flow to the back side of the location towards a forested area. Halliburton’s crew along with third party contactors noticed the flow of the fluid. They reacted by using a bulldozer and digging a trench to stop the fluid from entering the forested area. The captured fluid was then pumped into the pit on location. At the time of trench being dug, Halliburton employees built berms around the well head to divert all flow of fluid into the pit. Trenches were also dug by Halliburton employees to help the flow of the fluid into the pit. Bob Kidd from Weavertown Environmental group was contacted by Halliburton and arrived on site at 1:38 AM on 6-18-09. Mr. Kidd was taken around the area and shown where the trench was dug to catch any water that may have been running off of the location. He also reported that he had viewed the pump that was taking the water back up to the pit. Per a conversation with Mr. Mike O’ Donnell on 8-3-09 at 2:00 pm, the statement was made that no further actions required due to the results and remediation of the spill. With speaking with Mr. O’ Donnell, he stated that their samples from a small stream running behind the well location had not shown any significa;nt contamination.

Daniel Chimino HSE Technical Professional
cc: Michael Laxton



### HESI303041
710 P.2d 565

#### Marigay CONE, Claimant-Appellant, v. CLEARWATER VALLEY HOSPITAL, Employer, and Argonaut-Northwest Insurance Company, Surety, Defendants-Respondents.

No. 15767.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

Nov. 7, 1985.

Robert E. Kinney, Orofino, for claimant-appellant.

John W. Barrett, Boise, for defendants-respondents.

HUNTLEY, Justice.

Marigay Cone appeals from the Industrial Commission’s denial of her claim for Worker’s Compensation benefits and challenges its finding that her bulging disc at the L4-5 level of her spine was not caused by an accident occurring during the course and scope of her employment as a floor nurse at Clearwater Valley Hospital.

The Commission found that “[T]he bulging disc is most likely caused by Claimant’s preexisting [degenerative disc disease] condition.” Where contested findings of the Industrial Commission are supported by substantial, competent evidence, those findings will not be disturbed on appeal. I.C. § 72-732(1); *In re Chavez,*104 Idaho 279, 281, 658 P.2d 950, 952 (1983); *Case of Graham,*103 Idaho 824, 826, 654 P.2d 1377, 1379 (1982). Here, the Commission’s finding is supported by substantial competent evidence. Therefore we affirm its Order denying Ms. Cone compensation benefits.

Costs to the respondent. No attorney fees awarded.

DONALDSON, C.J., and SHEPARD, BAKES and BISTLINE, JJ., concur.