alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 54.618 Data collection and reporting. ( a ) Each applicant must file an annual report with the Administrator on or before September 30 for the preceding funding year, with the information and in the form specified by the Wireline Competition Bureau.
( b ) Each applicant must file an annual report for each funding year in which it receives support from the Healthcare Connect Fund Program.
( c ) For consortia that receive large upfront payments, the reporting requirement extends for the life of the supported facility.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4299 Engrossed Amendment House (EAH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        August 1, 1994.
      Resolved, That the House agree to the amendments of the Senate 
numbered 1 through 11 to the bill (H.R. 4299) entitled ``An Act to 
authorize the transfer of naval vessels to certain foreign 
countries.''.
      Resolved, That the House agree to the amendment of the Senate 
numbered 12 to the aforesaid bill, with the following

                              AMENDMENTS:

 (1)Page 2, beginning on line 13, strike [or any other provision of 
law].

 (2)Page 3, strike line 3 and all that follows through line 9.
            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4299

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENTS

                                   TO

                           SENATE AMENDMENTS
```
#### § 61.193 Vacation of suspension order; supplements announcing same; etc.

If the Commission vacates a suspension order, the affected carrier must issue a supplement or revised page stating the Commission's action as well as the lawful schedules.
§ 78.113 Frequency monitors and measurements. ( a ) The licensee of each CARS station shall employ a suitable procedure to determine that the carrier frequency of each transmitter is maintained within the tolerance prescribed in § 78.111 at all times. The determination shall be made, and the results thereof entered in the station records: when a transmitter is initially installed; when any change is made in a transmitter which may affect the carrier frequency or the stability thereof; or in any case at intervals not exceeding one year.
( b ) The choice of apparatus to measure the operating frequency is left to the discretion of the licensee. However, failure of the apparatus to detect departures of the operating frequency in excess of the prescribed tolerance will not be deemed an acceptable excuse for the violation.
[37 FR 3292, Feb. 12, 1972, as amended at 41 FR 29696, July 19, 1976; 50 FR 23422, June 4, 1985]
§ 80.453 Scope of communications. Public coast stations provide ship/shore radiotelephone and radiotelegraph services. ( a ) Public coast stations are authorized to communicate: ( 1 ) With any ship or aircraft station operating in the maritime mobile service, for the transmission or reception of safety communication;
( 2 ) With any land station to exchange safety communications to or from a ship or aircraft station;
( 3 ) With Government and non-Government ship and aircraft stations to exchange public correspondence;
( 4 ) With units on land in accordance with § 80.123.
( b ) Public coast stations are authorized to communicate with a designated station at a remote fixed location where other communication facilities are not available.
( c ) Public coast stations are authorized to transmit meteorological and navigational information of benefit to mariners.
( d ) Each public coast telegraphy station is authorized to communicate with other public coast telegraphy stations to exchange message traffic destined to or originated at mobile stations: ( 1 ) To exchange operating signals, brief service messages or safety communication;
( 2 ) To exchange message traffic destined for a mobile station when the coast station initially concerned is unable to communicate directly with the mobile station;
( 3 ) In the Great Lakes region, to exchange message traffic originated at a mobile station when the use of available point-to-point communication facilities would delay the delivery of such message traffic;
( 4 ) Utilization of radiotelegraphy must not incur additional charges or replace available point-to-point communication facilities;
( 5 ) Only authorized working frequencies within the band 415 kHz to 5000 kHz must be employed for communications between coast stations;
( 6 ) Harmful interference must not be caused to communication between mobile stations and coast stations or between mobile stations.
[51 FR 31213, Sept. 2, 1986, as amended at 62 FR 40307, July 28, 1997]
#### § 32.6122 Furniture and artworks expense.

This account shall include expenses associated with furniture and artworks.
No. 11-5750.

#### Corley *v.*United States.

C. A. llth Cir. Certiorari denied.
# STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

STATEOF CONNECTICUT and the Connecticut Resources 

### Recovery Authority 

### TRADrNG AGREEMENT AND ./ 

### ORDERNO. 8116 MODIFICATION

D:tte: 

### TRADING AGREEMENT AND ORDER MODIFICATION Inthe matterofaTrading Agreementand Orderbetweenthe CommissionerofEnvironmental Protection ("'Commissioner") and the Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority 

### ("CRRA.."). WHEREAS, the Commissionerand CRR.c\, having agreed to the terms and conditions SCt forth in Trading Agreement and OrderNo. 8116 issued on April 22, 1997, do now, by mutual 

### agreement, modify paragraphs A.6., B., D.2., D.? and 0.13. as follows: 1. Change the date specified in paragraph A.6. from May 1, 1999 to 

### December 14, 1999. 2. Change the first date specified in 

### paragraph B. from April 30. 1999 to December 14. 1999 and change the second date specified in paragraph B. from 

### April 30, 1999to December 14, 1999. 3. Change the second date specified inparagraph 0.2. from May 1. 1999 to December J

### 4, 1999 and change the third date specified in paragraph 

### 0.2. from 

### May 1, 1999 to December 14, 1999. 4. Change the date specified in paragraph 

### 0.7. from May 

### I, 1999 to 

### December 14, 1999. 5. Change the dale specified in paragraph 0.13. from May I, 199910 

### December 14, 1999.

All other tenns and conditions ofTrading Agree'ment and OrderNo. 8116 issucd 

### by the Commissioner acting under Sections 22a·6, 22a-171, 22a·174, 22a-176. 22<1.·]77 and 22a-l78 of the Connecticut Gencral Statutes shall remain in effect.

# InitiaI~ (PlinlCcl on Rccyclecl PlPCt) 19 Elm Slfeel • H.n[orcl, CT 06106·5121 hllp:llclcp.Slllc.CI.US All Equal Opportunity r""ployu /'

### Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority 

### 2 

### TRADINGAGREEMENT A DORDERNO 8116 MODfFICATION

Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority hereby consents to the entry ofthis modification to the Trading Agreement and Order without further notice.
Connecticul Resources Recovery Authority

Type arne: David S. Bro\.lYl 

### Type Title: Project and Customer Services Division Head 

### Date; April 28, 1999



### 1999 8116this Entered as a modiftcation ofan Orderofthe CommissionerofEnvironmental Protection numbered 

# _£>...2L-9 _dayof 

# +J

hur

### J. Rocque, Jr. ommlSSloner 

### CITY OF HARTFORD LAND RECORDS MAILED CERTIFIED MAIL.

RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Certified Document No.
§ 64.1801 Geographic rate averaging and rate integration. ( a ) The rates charged by providers of interexchange telecommunications services to subscribers in rural and high-cost areas shall be no higher than the rates charged by each such provider to its subscribers in urban areas.
( b ) A provider of interstate interexchange telecommunications services shall provide such services to its subscribers in each U.S. state at rates no higher than the rates charged to its subscribers in any other state.
[61 FR 42564, Aug. 16, 1996]
# Information Resources Management College Biographies

Information Resources Management College Biographies RSS Feed

- Mr. Steve Beland Steve Beland is a technical writer/editor at the National Defense University (NDU) in the College of
- Mr. Ishid Camp 
- Ms. Kendra Clymer Kendra Ostrowski has served as an Academic Specialist in the Office of Student Services at the
- Ms. Judy Robertson 
- Mr. Noah Stevens 
- Ms. Jeanita Williams
No. 11-6048.

#### Smith *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
###### Editorial Note on Part 74

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 74 appear at 64 FR 4055, Jan. 27, 1999.

#### § 74.769 Familiarity with FCC rules.

Each licensee or permittee of a station authorized under this subpart shall be familiar with those rules relating to stations authorized under this subpart. Copies of the Commission's rules may be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents, Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401, or accessed online at *https://www.ecfr.gov* or *https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/collectionCfr.action?collectionCode=CFR.*

[83 FR 13683, Mar. 30, 2018]
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 155 (Friday, August 11, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 46189]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6853]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security


Action Affecting Export Privileges; Data Physics Corporation, 
Data Physics China, Sri Welaratna, Bill Chen; Correction

    In the Federal Register of Tuesday, May 23, 2006, the Bureau of 
Industry and Security published an Order at 29613. This notice is being 
published to correct the name and add an additional address of one of 
the respondents listed in the caption and text in that order. The 
correct name and address are as follows: Sri Ramya Welaratna, 767 
Sunshine Dr., Los Altos, CA 94024.

    Dated: July 14, 2006
Darryl W. Jackson,
Assistant Secretary for Export Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 06-6853 Filed 8-10-06: 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DT-M
Argued May 3,

decided May 25,

rehearing denied July 20, 1909.

#### SHAFER *v.*BEECHER.

[101 Pac. 899.]

Appeal and Error — Time to File Brief — Excuse for Failure.

The failure of appellant to file his brief, due under rule 87, 50 Or. 588 (91 Pac. XII) on February 20th, until April 7th following, or to apply for an extension of time in which to file brief, is not excused by a showing of pressure of business on the part of his attorney and a delay of the printer in getting out the copy, and the judgment will be affirmed.

From Wallowa: John W. Knowles, Judge.

On Motion to Affirm.

Statement

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from the circuit court of Wallowa County in an action by F. F. Shafer against Oral Beecher. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals. The bill of exceptions was settled and allowed December 19, 1908. The transcript was filed in this court January 20, 1909. Under rule 37 of this court (50 Or. 588: 91 Pac. XII), appellant should have filed his brief before February 20, 1909. It was actually filed April 7, 1909.

Respondent, on March 31, 1909, filed a motion to affirm the judgment on the ground of appellant’s failure to file his brief within the time prescribed by rule 37 (50 Or. *274588: 91 Pac. XII). At the hearing appellant filed an affidavit in excuse of his delay in filing brief.

*Mr. James A. Burleigh,*for the motion.

*Mr. Daniel W. Shehan, contra.*

Affirmed.

Per Curiam

: Appellant’s brief was due, under rule 37 of this court (50 Or. 588: 91 Pac. XII), on February 20, 1909. It was not filed until April 7, 1909. Appellant submits affidavits of his attorney, showing pressure of business upon himself in court, and delay on the part of the printer in getting out the copy, which affidavit is supplemented by an affidavit of the printer as to various delays caused, by failure to get competent workmen in his job office.

We think reasonable diligence, under the circumstances, required the appellant to apply to this court for an extension of time, and that the matter set forth in the affidavits filed by him is not sufficient to excuse his long delay in filing such briefs or his neglect to apply for an extension of time in which to do so.

The judgment of the court below will be affirmed.

Affirmed.
§ 73.877 Station logs for LPFM stations. The licensee of each LPFM station must maintain a station log. Each log entry must include the time and date of observation and the name of the person making the entry. The following information must be entered in the station log: ( a ) Any extinguishment or malfunction of the antenna structure obstruction lighting, adjustments, repairs, or replacement to the lighting system, or related notification to the FAA. See §§ 17.48 and 73.49 of this chapter.
( b ) Brief explanation of station outages due to equipment malfunction, servicing, or replacement;
( c ) Operations not in accordance with the station license; and
( d ) EAS weekly log requirements set forth in § 11.61(a)(1)(v) of this chapter.
[65 FR 67304, Nov. 9, 2000]
#### § 69.411 Other expenses.

Except as provided in §§ 69.412, 69.413, and 69.414, expenses that are not apportioned pursuant to §§ 69.401 through 69.409 shall be apportioned among the interexchange category and all access elements in the same manner as § 69.309 Other investment.

[62 FR 31639, June 11, 1997]
Submitted on record and briefs June 20,

conviction for assault in the third degree reversed; remanded for entry of conviction for assault in the fourth degree and resentencing July 13, 1994

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*JOHN WAYNE CONNELL, *Appellant.*

(93-1091; CA A80078)

876 P2d 867

Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, and Mary M. Reese, Deputy Public Defender, filed the brief for appellant.

Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Jonathan H. Fussner, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Richardson, Chief Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*145PER CURIAM

In a trial to the court, defendant was found guilty of the uncharged crime of assault in the third degree, ORS 163.165, as a lesser included offense of assault in the second degree, ORS 163.175, for which he was indicted. On appeal, defendant argues that his motion for judgment of acquittal of assault in the third degree should have been granted, because that crime is not a lesser included offense of assault in the second degree. The state concedes that the court erred, and we accept that concession.

Defendant requests that we remand the case for entry of a conviction for the lesser included offense of assault in the fourth degree, ORS 163.160. We agree that that is the correct disposition.

Conviction for assault in the third degree reversed; remanded for entry of conviction for assault in the fourth degree and for resentencing.
#### § 73.35 Calculation of improvement factors.

A petition for an allotment (See § 73.30) in the 1605-1705 kHz band filed by an existing fulltime AM station licensed in the 535-1605 kHz band will be ranked according to the station's calculated improvement factor. (See § 73.30). Improvement factors relate to both nighttime and daytime interference conditions and are based on two distinct considerations: (a) Service area lost by other stations due to interference caused by the subject station, and (b) service area of the subject station. These considerations are represented by a ratio. The ratio consists, where applicable, of two separate additive components, one for nighttime and one for daytime. For the nighttime component, to determine the numerator of the ratio (first consideration), calculate the RSS and associated service area of the stations (co- and adjacent channel) to which the subject station causes nighttime interference. Next, repeat the RSS and service area calculations excluding the subject station. The cumulative gain in the above service area is the numerator of the ratio. The denominator (second consideration) is the subject station's interference-free service area. For the daytime component, the composite amount of service lost by co-channel and adjacent channel stations, each taken individually, that are affected by the subject station, excluding the effects of other assignments during each study, will be used as the numerator of the daytime improvement factor. The denominator will consist of the actual daytime service area (0.5 mV/m contour) less any area lost to interference from other assignments. The value of this combined ratio will constitute the petitioner's improvement factor. Notwithstanding the requirements of § 73.153, for uniform comparisons and simplicity, measurement data will not be used for determining improvement factors and FCC figure M-3 ground conductivity values are to be used exclusively in accordance with the pertinent provisions of § 73.183(c)(1).

[56 FR 64858, Dec. 12, 1991]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-2792
JAMES C. MARTIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THE PANTRY, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-93-319-3-MU) Submitted: January 30, 1996 Decided: February 26, 1996 Before HALL and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James C. Martin, Appellant Pro Se. Randel Eugene Phillips, Karin Marie McGinnis, MOORE & VAN ALLEN, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order grantingDefendant's motion for summary judgment on Appellant's Age Discrimination in Employment claim. We have reviewed the record and thedistrict court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Martin v. Pantry Incorporated , No. CA-93-319-3-MU (W.D.N.C. Aug. 18, 1995). We deny Defendant's motion to strike and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 73.6006 Channel assignments.

Class A TV stations will not be authorized on channels unavailable for TV broadcast station use pursuant to § 73.603.

[86 FR 66213, Nov. 22, 2021]
No. 11-8806.

#### Smith *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of *Reynolds*v. *United States,*565 U. S. 432 (2012).
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4704

To provide for the conveyance of certain lands and improvements in Hopewell

Township, Pennsylvania, to a nonprofit organization known as the ‘‘Beaver County Corporation for Economic Development’’ to provide a site

for economic development.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 30, 1994

Mr. KLINK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Public Works and Transportation

A BILL

To provide for the conveyance of certain lands and improvements in Hopewell Township, Pennsylvania, to a nonprofit organization known as the ‘‘Beaver County Corporation for Economic Development’’ to provide a site

for economic development.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hopewell Township

5 Investment Act of 1994’’.
2

•HR 4704 IH

1 SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE OF LAND.

2 (a) ADMINISTRATOR OF GENERAL SERVICES.—Sub3 ject to sections 2 and 3, the Administrator of General

4 Services (hereinafter in this Act referred to as the ‘‘Ad5 ministrator’’) shall convey, without compensation, to a

6 nonprofit organization known as the ‘‘Beaver County Cor7 poration for Economic Development’’ all right, title, and

8 interest of the United States in and to those pieces or par9 cels of land in Hopewell Township, Pennsylvania, de10 scribed in subsection (b), together with all improvements

11 thereon and appurtenances thereto. The purpose of the

12 conveyance is to provide a site for economic development

13 in Hopewell Township.

14 (b) PROPERTY DESCRIPTION.—The land referred to

15 in subsection (a) is approximately 16 acres on what was

16 formerly Aliquippa Airport on Airport Road in Hopewell

17 Township, Pennsylvania, which were most recently used

18 by the Mine Safety and Health Administration for mine

19 emergency operations and includes a building of approxi20 mately 45,000 square feet.

21 (c) DATE OF CONVEYANCE.—The date of the convey22 ance of property required under subsection (a) shall be

23 not later than the 90th day following the date of the enact24 ment of this Act.
3

•HR 4704 IH

1 SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON CONVEYANCE.

2 No part of any land conveyed under section 1 may

3 be used, during the 30-year period beginning on the date

4 of conveyance, for any purpose other than economic devel5 opment.

6 SEC. 4. REVERSIONARY INTEREST.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The property conveyed under sec8 tion 1 shall revert to the United States on any date in

9 the 30-year period beginning on the date of such convey10 ance, on which the property is used for a purpose other

11 than that economic development.

12 (b) ENFORCING REVERSION.—The Administrator

13 shall perform all acts necessary to enforce any reversion

14 of property to the United States under this section.

15 (c) INVENTORY OF PUBLIC BUILDINGS SERVICE.—

16 Property that reverts to the United States under this sec17 tion shall be under the control of the General Services Ad18 ministration.

Æ
#### § 76.93 Parties entitled to network non-duplication protection.

Television broadcast station licensees shall be entitled to exercise non-duplication rights pursuant to § 76.92 in accordance with the contractual provisions of the network-affiliate agreement.