alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Carroll Dunscombe, *Plaintiff in Error,*vs. O. Nobles, as Receiver of the Stuart Bank & Trust Company, a corporation, *Defendant in Error.*

141 So. 893.

Decision filed July 5, 1932.

Petition for rehearing denied August 8, 1932.

*T. T. Oughterson*and *D. C. Smith,*of Stuart, for Plaintiff in Error;

*Smith & Kanner,*of Stuart, for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to' be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said judgment. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Buford, C.J. and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.
No. 11-9588.

#### Da Costa *v.*United States et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
093A15

#### Town of Boone v. State of North Carolina and County of Watauga

Pit’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal

Special Order
5 May, 2016

Federal Aviation Administration

Orville Wright Building (FOB-10A)

800 Independence Ave. SW

Washington, DC 20591

Subject: Time-limited Exemption from Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations 

(14 CFR) part 91, § 91.227(c)(1)(i) and (iii)–Automatic Dependent SurveillanceBroadcast (ADS-B) Out Equipment Performance Requirements.

Reference: Grant of Exemption No. 12555, Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0971.

Grant of Exemption 12555 provides for a time-limited grant of exemption from the 

ADS-B Navigation Accuracy Category for Position (NACp) and Navigation Integrity 

Category (NIC) requirements of § 91.227(c)(1)(i) and (iii) from January 1, 2020, 

through December 31, 2024.

JetBlue Airways Corporation, 27-01 Queens Plaza North, Long Island City, NY 11101 

herby notifies the FAA that we intend to comply with the conditions and limitations 

expressed in the exemption cited above.

Sincerely,

Thomas R. Howell

Director of Operations 

Copies:

AFS-1

Flight Standards District Office FSDO-15
###### Editorial Note on Part 74

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 74 appear at 64 FR 4055, Jan. 27, 1999.

#### § 74.19 Special technical records.

The FCC may require a broadcast auxiliary station licensee to keep operating and maintenance records necessary to resolve conditions of actual or potential interference, rule violations, or deficient technical operation.

[48 FR 38482, Aug. 24, 1983]
No. 11-5710.

#### Cortez Estrada *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4537 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4537

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for the vessel OLD HAT.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 26, 1994

Mr. Burton of Indiana introduced the following bill; which was referred 
           to the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for the vessel OLD HAT.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the 
Act of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and sections 12106, 12107, 
and 12108 of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of 
Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation with 
appropriate endorsement for the vessel OLD HAT (United States official 
number 508299).

                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 74
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 74 appear at 64 FR 4055, Jan. 27, 1999.

§ 74.23 Interference jeopardizing safety of life or protection of property. ( a ) The licensee of any station authorized under this part that causes harmful interference, as defined in § 2.1 of the Commission's rules, to radio communications involving the safety of life or protection of property shall promptly eliminate the interference.
( b ) If harmful interference to radio communications involving the safety of life or protection of property cannot be promptly eliminated and the Commission finds that there exists an imminent danger to safety of life or protection of property, pursuant to 47 U.S.C. 312 (b) and (e) and 5 U.S.C. 558, operation of the offending equipment shall temporarily be suspended and shall not be resumed until the harmful interference has been eliminated or the threat to the safety of life or property has passed. In situations where the protection of property alone is jeopardized, before taking any action under this paragraph, the Commission shall balance the nature and extent of the possible property damage against the potential harm to a licensee or the public caused by suspending part 74 operations. When specifically authorized, short test operations may be made during the period of suspended operation to check the efficacy of remedial measures.
[47 FR 1395, Jan. 13, 1982]
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-50179

No. 97-50214

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ARTUMUS CHARLES MATTHEWS,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. W-93-CR-9-1

USDC No. W-96-CV-462

- - - - - - - - - -

August 15, 1997

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Artumus Charles Matthews, federal prisoner #60704-080, seeks

to appeal from the grant of the Government’s motion to reduce his

sentence and from the denial of his own motion for relief under

28 U.S.C. § 2255. Matthews moves to strike the appellee’s brief;

his motion to strike is DENIED.

We must examine the basis of our jurisdiction on our own

motion if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th
No. 97-50179

No. 97-50214

-2-

Cir. 1987). A timely notice of appeal is a prerequisite for the

exercise of our jurisdiction. United States v. Carr, 979 F.2d

51, 55 (5th Cir. 1992). Matthews did not file a timely notice of

appeal following the order granting the Government’s motion for

reduction of sentence; accordingly, appeal no. 97-50179 is

DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction.

On April 24, 1996, the President signed the Antiterrorism

and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), which applies to

the instant case because Matthews’s motion was filed in the

district court after April 24, 1996. See Green v. Johnson, 116

F.3d 1115 (5th Cir. 1997). The AEDPA amended 28 U.S.C. § 2253 to

require a certificate of appealability (COA) by a circuit justice

or judge before an appeal may be taken in a § 2255 proceeding. 

§ 2253(c)(1). A COA may be issued only if the prisoner has made

a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

§ 2253(c)(2). 

The district court must rule on a COA before Matthews may

request a COA from this court. See Muniz v. Johnson, 114 F.3d

43, 45 (5th Cir. 1997); United States v. Youngblood, 116 F.3d

1113 (5th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, Matthews’s § 2255 case,

appeal no. 97-50214, is REMANDED for the limited purpose of

allowing the district court to determine whether any of the

issues Matthews wishes to raise merit granting Matthews a COA.

Appeal no. 97-50179 DISMISSED.

Appeal no. 97-50214 LIMITED REMAND.
No. 97-50179

No. 97-50214

-3-
§ 80.108 Transmission of traffic lists by coast stations. ( a ) Each coast station is authorized to transmit lists of call signs in alphabetical order of all mobile stations for which they have traffic on hand. These traffic lists will be transmitted on the station's normal working frequencies at intervals of: ( 1 ) In the case of telegraphy, at least two hours and not more than four hours during the working hours of the coast station.
( 2 ) In the case of radiotelephony, at least one hour and not more than four hours during the working hours of the coast station.
( b ) The announcement must be as brief as possible and must not be repeated more than twice. Coast stations may announce on a calling frequency that they are about to transmit call lists on a specific working frequency.
§ 27.65 Acceptance of interference in 2000-2020 MHz. ( a ) Receivers operating in the 2000-2020 MHz band must accept interference from lawful operations in the 1995-2000 MHz band, where such interference is due to: ( 1 ) The in-band power of any operations in 1995-2000 MHz (i.e., the portion transmit power contained in the 1995-2000 MHz band); or
( 2 ) The portion of out-of-band emissions contained in 2000-2005 MHz.
( b ) [Reserved]
[78 FR 8270, Feb. 5, 2013]
#### § 73.3612 Annual employment report.

Each licensee or permittee of a commercially or noncommercially operated AM, FM, TV, Class A TV or International Broadcast station with five or more full-time employees shall file an annual employment report with the FCC on or before September 30 of each year on FCC Form 395-B. Data concerning the gender, race and ethnicity of a broadcast station's workforce collected in the annual employment report will be used only for purposes of analyzing industry trends and making reports to Congress. Such data will not be used for the purpose of assessing any aspect of an individual broadcast licensee's or permittee's compliance with the nondiscrimination or equal employment opportunity requirements of § 73.2080. Compliance with this section will not be required until this sentence is removed or contains a compliance date, which will not occur until after the Office of Management and Budget completes review of any information collection requirements pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act or until after the Office of Management and Budget determines that such review is not required.

[89 FR 36718, May 3, 2024]
§ 61.133 Format of concurrences. ( a ) Concurrences must be issued in the following format: Concurrence F.C.C. Concurrence No. ____ (Cancels F.C.C. Concurrence No. __ (Name of Carrier ______) (Post Office Address ______) (Date) ___________ 19__. Secretary, *Federal Communications Commission, Washington, D.C. 20554.* This is to report that (name of concurring carrier) assents to and concurs in the tariffs described below. (Name of concurring carrier) thus makes itself a party to these tariffs and obligates itself (and its connecting carriers) to observe every provision in them, until a notice of revocation is filed with the Commission and delivered to the issuing carrier. This concurrence applies to interstate (and foreign) communication: 1. Between the different points on the concurring carrier's own system; 2. Between all points on the concurring carrier's system and the systems of its connecting carriers; and 3. Between all points on the system of the concurring carrier and the systems of its connecting carriers on the one hand, and, on the other hand, all points on the system of the carrier issuing the tariff or tariffs listed below and the systems of its connecting carriers and other carriers with which through routes have been established. (Note:
Any of the above numbered paragraphs may be omitted or the wording modified to state the points to which the concurrence applies.)
Tariff (Here describe the tariff or tariffs concurred in by the carrier, specifying FCC number, title, date of issuance, and date effective. Example: A.B.C. Communications Company, Tariff FCC No. 1, Interstate Telegraph Message Service, Issued January 1, 1983, Effective April 1, 1983). Cancels FCC Concurrence No.___, effective ____________, 19__. (Name of concurring carrier) By (Title)
( b ) No material is to be included in a concurrence other than that indicated in the above-prescribed form, unless specially authorized by the Commission. A concurrence in any tariff so described will be deemed to include all amendments and successive issues which the issuing carrier may make and file. All such amendments and successive issues will be binding between customers and carriers. Between carriers themselves, however, the filing by the issuing carrier of an amendment or successive issue with the Commission must not imply or be construed to imply an agreement to the filing by concurring carriers. Such filings do not affect the contractual rights or remedies of any concurring carrier(s) which have not, by contract or otherwise, specifically consented in advance to such amendment or successive issue.
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4790 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4790

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
  To designate the United States courthouse under construction in St. 
      Louis, Missouri, as the ``Thomas F. Eagleton United States 
                             Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse under construction at 111 South Tenth 
Street in St. Louis, Missouri, shall be known and designated as the 
``Thomas F. Eagleton United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Thomas F. 
Eagleton United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives August 8, 1994.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.
                                     





103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4790

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To designate the United States courthouse under construction in St. 
      Louis, Missouri, as the ``Thomas F. Eagleton United States 
                             Courthouse''.`
No. 11-8760.

#### Webster *v.*Grounds, Acting Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4813 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4813

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
                coastwise trade for the vessel BIG DAD.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 21, 1994

   Mr. Shaw introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
                coastwise trade for the vessel BIG DAD.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
That notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 
App. U.S.C. 883), the Act of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and 
section 12106 of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of 
Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation with 
appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the 
vessel BIG DAD (United States official number 565022).
                                 <all>
```
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-30323

Summary Calendar

DAVID GLEN HARRISON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

WHNO; BELL SOUTH; COX CABLE INTERNATIONAL; GENERAL DYNAMICS;

GENERAL ELECTRIC; IBM; NY STOCK EXCHANGE; New York Stock Exchange;

BRINKER INTERNATIONAL; HOLLYWOOD ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION; PROCTOR

AND GAMBLE; APPLE SOUTH; SCHWEGMANN'S SUPERMARKET; WORLD BANK CORP;

ERNST & YOUNG; COLUMBIA; TENAT; INTER BUSINESS COMM; GAMBINO CRIME

ORGANIZATION; MARCELLO CRIME ORGANIZATION; MATAEN CRIME

ORGANIZATION; STATE OF LOUISIANA; FEDERAL GOVERNMENT; LOCAL

GOVERNMENT; UNIDENTIFIED PARTIES,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Louisiana

(98-CV-462-K)

Febraury 12, 1999

Before DAVIS, DUHÉ, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

AFFIRMED. See 5TH CIR. R. 47.6.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 20, 2022

No. 04-22-00009-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF D.R.B. and E.B.,

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1988-CI-00019

Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding

ORDER

The reporter’s record was originally due February 10, 2022, but was not filed. On 

February 10, 2022, court reporter Maria Fattahi filed a notification of late record, requesting an 

extension until March 14, 2022. We granted court reporter Fattahi’s request and ordered her to 

file her portion of the reporter’s record by March 14, 2022. Fattahi did not file her portion of the 

reporter’s record by this date. On March 28, 2022, we ordered Fattahi to file her portion of the 

reporter’s record by April 7, 2022. On March 29, 2022, Fattahi filed a notification of late record, 

stating that the reporter’s record was not filed because appellant had failed to pay or make 

arrangements to pay the court reporter’s fee for preparing the record and that appellant was not 

entitled to appeal without paying the fee. 

We therefore ORDER that appellant provide written proof to this court that either (1) the 

reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the reporter’s fee; or (2) 

appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s fee within 10 days from the date of 

this order. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, appellant’s brief will be due 

within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, and the court will consider only those issues or 

points raised in appellant’s brief that do not require court reporter Fattahi’s portion of the 

reporter’s record for a decision. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c).

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 20th day of April, 2022.
___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
§ 10.330 Provider infrastructure requirements. This section specifies the general functions that a Participating CMS Provider is required to perform within their infrastructure. Infrastructure functions are dependent upon the capabilities of the delivery technologies implemented by a Participating CMS Provider. ( a ) Distribution of Alert Messages to mobile devices.
( b ) Authentication of interactions with mobile devices.
( c ) Reference Points D & E. Reference Point D is the interface between a CMS Provider gateway and its infrastructure. Reference Point E is the interface between a provider's infrastructure and mobile devices including air interfaces. Reference Points D and E protocols are defined and controlled by each Participating CMS Provider.
| 1) | to      the best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2) | to      the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of      operations of the Company. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Date      : June 14 2009 | By:  /s/ Linden    Boyne |   |
|--------|--------------------------|------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                     | Linden      Boyne                  |   |
|   |                     | Secretary      / Treasurer         |   |
|   |                     | (Principal      Financial Officer) |   |

----
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-1363

Lower Tribunal No. 2021-CA-007529-O

_____________________________

HOOF’S PETS, INC. d/b/a PETLAND ORLANDO EAST, PETLAND ORLANDO SOUTH, INC.

and BREEDER’S PICK ORLANDO, INC.,

Appellants, 

v.

ORANGE COUNTY,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Orange County.

Vincent S. Chiu, Judge.

April 16, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOZNIAK, WHITE and GANNAM, JJ., concur.

Nicholas A. Shannin and Carol B. Shannin, of Shannin Law Firm, P.A., Orlando, 

for Appellants.

Georgiana Holmes, Deputy County Attorney, and Jeffrey J. Newton, County 

Attorney, of Orange County Attorney’s Office, Orlando, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED