alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"Patrick Chesnut","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/chesnutp\/","title":"Notice of Revised Building Access Restrictions and Protocols for In-Person Argument - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"DWnOa6QaNm\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/notice-of-revised-building-access-restrictions-and-protocols-for-in-person-argument\/\">Notice of Revised Building Access Restrictions and Protocols for In-Person Argument<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/notice-of-revised-building-access-restrictions-and-protocols-for-in-person-argument\/embed\/#?secret=DWnOa6QaNm\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Notice of Revised Building Access Restrictions and Protocols for In-Person Argument” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"DWnOa6QaNm\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the U.S. Court of Federal Claims have entered a new joint order modifying and superseding their prior administrative order of October 25, 2021, concerning access to the National Courts Building complex in Washington, D.C. The order maintains existing access restrictions, adds additional building-wide masking […]"}
You too.

From: "Lee, Amanda I." <Amanda_I._Lee@omb.eop.gov>

To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Beth Hassett

- Sipple/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Eloise Shepherd/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Joseph

- J

Dougherty/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 12/07/2012 11:56 AM Subject: RE: Call

- in number for Monday and Tuesday PM NAAQS meetings



### Great! I ’ ll send the number out. Thanks and have a good weekend!

From: Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 11:50 AM

To: Lee, Amanda I.

Cc: Hassett

- Sipple.Beth@epamail.epa.gov; Shepherd.Eloise@epamail.epa.gov; Dougherty.Joseph

J@epamail.epa.gov Subject: RE: Call

- in number for Monday and Tuesday PM NAAQS meetings

We should have lots of lines

-- it's a system that allows many peopl e to call in. We used this number when we met to discuss the proposal in June and had no problems at that time.

"Lee, Amanda I."

--- 12/07/2012 10:51:29 AM

--- Thanks Lydia. That my one of my things to do today. How many l ines do we have? Thanks! From: Wegm

From: "Lee, Amanda I." < Amanda_I._Lee@omb.eop.gov > To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Joseph

- J Dougherty/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Beth Hassett

- Sipple/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Eloise Shepherd/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 12/07/2012 10:51 AM Subject: RE: Call

- in number for Monday and Tuesday PM NAAQS meetings

Thanks Lydia. That my one of my things to do today . How many lines do we have? Thanks!

From: Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov [ mailto:Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov ]

Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 10:45 AM

To: Lee, Amanda I.

Cc: Dougherty.Joseph

- J@epamail.epa.gov ; Hassett

- Sipple.Beth@epamail.epa.gov ; Shepherd.Eloise@epamail.epa.gov Subject: Call

- in number for Monday and Tuesday PM NAAQS meetings

Amanda,

Since I didn't hear from you about what call

- in number to use for the PM NAAQS meetings on Monday and Tuesday, I thought I would offer th e use of our call

- in number. That number is 1

- 866

- 299

- 3188, code 9195410514#. Please let me know if this plan works for you or if you want to use a different number. If we do use this number, I assume you'll be sending it out to the other agencies who will be participating on the

call. Thanks.

Lydia
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.12

                                 LEASE ADDENDUM

This Agreement, made this 26th day of September 2006 by and between WALLINGFORD
WAREHOUSE LLC (hereinafter referred to as "Landlord") and MAGNETEC CORP.
(hereinafter referred to as "Tenant");

                                  WITNESS THAT:

Whereas, the parties hereto have heretofore entered into a "Lease of Industrial
Property" Agreement dated July 30, 1997, whereby Landlord (successor in interest
to (Pyramid Construction Company) leased to Tenant approximately 49,068 square
feet with an expiration date of March 31, 2008; and

Whereas, Tenant desires to terminate its business operations at the location
covered by the Lease and to cancel and terminate its obligations and rights
hereunder; and whereas also:

Landlord desires to cancel and terminate the Lease as of the close of business
April 30, 2007;

Now therefore, Landlord and Tenant agree as follows:

     1.   Article 1 (e) "Expiration Date" Is hereby amended to April 30, 2007
          and the Lease Agreement (including the Lease Agreement Riders "Option
          to Renew #1" and "Option to Renew #2") shall be deemed expired as of
          the close of business April 30, 2007.

     2.   Tenant shall vacate and surrender the premises to Landlord by
          delivering all keys to Pyramid Construction Group LLC, 275 North
          Franklin Turnpike, Ramsey, NJ 07446.

     3.   Tenant will leave the premises in a broom clean condition, all
          fixtures can be left at Tenant's option.

     4.   The payment due Landlord for the unamortized portion of the
          $350,000.00 office expansion will be reduced by $75,000.00.

All other terms and conditions of the Lease of Industrial Property will remain
in full force and effect.

WALLINGFORD WAREHOUSE LLC               MAGNETEC, CORP.


/s/ William J. Coleman                  /s/ Steven A. DeMartino
-------------------------------------   ----------------------------------------
William J. Coleman                      Steven A. DeMartino
Date: 11/28/06


                                        /s/ Bart C. Shuldman
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Bart C. Shuldman
                                        Date: 11/27/06
#### § 73.733 Normal license period.

All international broadcast station licenses will be issued so as to expire at the hour of 3 a.m. local time and will be issued for a normal period of 8 years expiring November 1.

[62 FR 5347, Feb. 5, 1997]
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Celadon Group, Inc.
Registration Statement 333-14641 on Form S-8 pertaining to the Employee Stock
Purchase Plan dated October 23, 1996, Registration Statement 333-42209 on Form
S-8 pertaining to the Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan dated December 12,
1997, and Registration Statements 333-42207 and 333-31164 on Form S-8 pertaining
to the 1994 Stock Option Plan dated December 12, 1997 and February 25, 2000,
respectively, of our report dated August 8, 2003 (except for Note 13, as to
which the date is August 21, 2003), with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Celadon Group, Inc. included in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2003.

                                                /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana
September 18, 2003
#### § 73.232 Territorial exclusivity.

No licensee of an FM broadcast station shall have any arrangement with a network organization which prevents or hinders another station serving substantially the same area from broadcasting the network's programs not taken by the former station, or which prevents or hinders another station serving a substantially different area from broadcasting any program of the network organization: *Provided, however,* That this section does not prohibit arrangements under which the station is granted first call within its primary service area upon the network's programs. The term “network organization” means any organization originating program material, with or without commercial messages, and furnishing the same to stations interconnected so as to permit simultaneous broadcast by all or some of them. However, arrangements involving only stations under common ownership, or only the rebroadcast by one station of programming from another with no compensation other than a lump-sum payment by the station rebroadcasting, are not considered arrangements with a network organization. The term “arrangement“ means any contract, arrangement or understanding, express or implied.

[42 FR 16422, Mar. 28, 1977, as amended at 57 FR 48333, Oct. 23, 1992]
#### § 76.1805 Alternative rate regulation agreements.

Small systems owned by small cable companies must file with the Commission a copy of any operative alternative rate regulation agreement entered into with a local franchising authority pursuant to § 76.934(g), within 30 days after its effective date.
# NDU iCollege Hosts SPIDERS Industry Day

/ Published June 18, 2012

The Smart Power Infrastructure Demonstration for Energy Reliability and Security (SPIDERS) Joint Capability Technology Demonstration (JCTD) Industry Day was held at the National Defense University iCollege on Tuesday, June 18, 2013. SPIDERS is jointly sponsored by the Departments of Defense, Energy, and Homeland Security (DoD, DOE, DHS).  This event provided organizations interested in implementing a secure microgrid with guidance on assessing their facility's needs, translating them into procurement requirements, and assembling the necessary site data package for bidders. 

**Industry Day Highlights included...**
      - Performance Metrics for Evaluating New Microgrids
      - Approaches to Controlling Architecture Specifications
      - Utility Interconnection and Service Agreement Issues
      - Cyber Security
      - SPIDERS Technology Case Studies

The NDU iCollege’s faculty members, John Saunders, Russ Mattern, and Gil Duvall participated in the event, and Dr. Saunders was given special recognition for his help in organizing the day.  DoD Combatant Commands (COCOMs) and National Laboratories also participated.
#### § 73.753 Antenna systems.

All international broadcasting stations shall operate with directional antennas. Such antennas shall be designed and operated so that the radiated power in the maximum lobe toward the specific zone or area of reception intended to be served shall be at least 10 times the average power from the antenna in the horizontal plane. Radiation in all other directions shall be suppressed to the maximum extent technically feasible. In order to eliminate or mitigate harmful interference, the direction of the maximum lobe may be adjusted upon approval of the Commission.

(Secs. 4, 5, 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1066, 1068, 1082 (47 U.S.C. 154, 155, 303))

[38 FR 18895, July 16, 1973, as amended at 44 FR 65765, Nov. 15, 1979]
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4762

To amend title 39, United States Code, to require the Postal Service to

accept a change-of-address order from a commercial mail receiving agency

and to forward mail to the new address.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 14, 1994

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

A BILL

To amend title 39, United States Code, to require the Postal

Service to accept a change-of-address order from a commercial mail receiving agency and to forward mail to

the new address.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CHANGE-OF-ADDRESS ORDER BY COMMERCIAL

4 MAIL RECEIVING AGENT.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 36 of title 39, United

6 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow7 ing:
2

•HR 4762 IH

1 ‘‘§ 3686. Change-of-address order by commercial mail

2 receiving agency

3 ‘‘Upon termination of an agency relationship between

4 an addressee and a commercial mail receiving agency, ei5 ther the addressee or the commercial mail receiving agency

6 may file a change-of-address order with the Postal Service.

7 The Postal Service shall forward to such addressee mail

8 which is marked for forwarding by the commercial mail

9 receiving agency in the same manner as, and subject to

10 the same terms and conditions as apply to, mail forwarded

11 directly by the Postal Service to such addressee.’’.

12 (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents at

13 the beginning of chapter 36 of title 39, United States

14 Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to

15 section 3685 the following new item:

‘‘3686. Change-of-address order by commercial mail receiving agency.’’.

Æ
[Civ. No. 1280.

First Appellate District.

November 5, 1913.]

#### SARAH E. MOORE, Respondent, v. MARY E. GILSON, and MARY E. GILSON, as Executrix of the Will of Rufus K. Gilson, Deceased, Appellant.

Appeal—Beview op Conflicting Evidence in Suit to Quiet Title.— Where the evidence in a suit to quiet title is conflicting as to whether a deed was intended to be delivered, and also as to whether it was intended merely as a mortgage, the findings of the jury will not be interfered with on appeal.

Id.—Statement *of*Case—Assignment of Error as to Instructions.—Where the transcript on appeal discloses that the instructions of the court have not been embodied in the statement of the ease, and that no specification of error in the giving of instructions has been made in the statement, the argument of the appellant as to error in such instructions cannot be considered by the appellate court.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County and from an order refusing a new trial. Lucas F. Smith, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

David C. Clark, and Carl E. Lindsay, for Appellant.

Benj. K. Knight, for Respondent.

RICHARDS, J.

This is an action to quiet title to a lot in the city of Santa Cruz. The complaint is in the usual form. The defendants appeared by answer, denying title in the plaintiff, and also by cross-complaint, setting up title in decedent Rufus K. Gilson at the time of his death.

Upon the trial the plaintiff presented a deed of the lot in question from said Gilson to her, executed and claimed by her to have been delivered prior to his death. With respect to the execution of this deed there is no *dispute;*but with respect to its delivery, and the intention of the defendant Gilson, at the time he handed it to the plaintiff, as to whether it was to pass from his control; or, as to whether it was intended to be merely a mortgage for money due by him to the plaintiff, the evidence is clearly conflicting. The jury resolved these sub*160stantial conflicts in the evidence in favor of the plaintiff, and with its discretion in that respect it is not our province to interfere.

The appellants further contend that certain instructions said to have been given by the court to the jury are erroneous in the respects pointed out in the briefs of their counsel. The transcript discloses that the instructions of the court were not .embodied in the statement of the ease; and further discloses that no specification of error on the part of the court in giving any of its instructions was therein made. For each of these reasons the argument of counsel for the appellants as to said erroneous instructions cannot be considered upon this appeal. *(Paris*v. *Raynor,*76 Cal. 647, [18 Pac. 788]; *Matthews*v. *Jones,*92 Cal. 563, [28 Pac. 597]; *Braverman*v. *Fresno C. & I. Co.,*101 Cal. 644, [36 Pac. 386]; *Southern Pacific Co.*v. *Superior Court,*105 Cal. 84, [38 Pac. 627]; *Kelly*v. *Ning Yung Ben. Assoc.,*2 Cal. App. 460, [84 Pac. 321].)

No error appearing in the record the judgment and order denying the defendants’ motion for a new trial are affirmed.

Lennon, P. J., and Kerrigan, J., concurred.
Application for Graduate Program Completion

CICOSS@ndu.edu 

Fax: 202‐685‐4058

Grad Form v 2020‐12‐23

INSTRUCTIONS 

NDU CIC students who have met the requirements for a certificate program and/or the Government 

Information Leadership (GIL) Master of Science Program must complete and return this “Application for 

Graduate Program Completion” by email directly to the NDU CIC (as an attachment) to CICOSS@ndu.edu 

or by fax to 202-685-4058. 

TRANSCRIPTS 

The NDU Registrar's Office prepares and mails all transcripts for the university. The request form is available at 

http://www.ndu.edu/academics/registrar. 

QUESTIONS? 

If you have any questions regarding the requirements for completion or the Application for Graduate Program 

Completion please contact the CIC Academic Advisor at logann@ndu.edu. 

COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: 

Name (Last, First, MI): 

(Please include prefix and suffix, if applicable. Use full legal name.) 

Email: 

Mailing Address: 

Completed Graduate Programs (mark all that apply): 

Place 

X

Certificate Programs Place 

X

GIL Master of Science Concentrations

Chief Financial Officer (CFO) Leadership Certificate Chief Financial Officer (CFO)

Chief Information Officer Certificate (CIO) Chief Information Officer (CIO)

Cyber‐ Leadership Certificate (Cyber‐L) Cyber‐Leadership (Cyber‐L)

NSTISSI 4011 Certificate Cyber‐ Security (Cyber‐S)

CNSS 4012/NSTISSI 4015/CNSSI 4016 Certificate Information Technology Program Management (ITPM)

Chief Information Security Officer Certificate (CISO) Enterprise Architecture (EA)

Architect Certificate Government Strategic Leader (GSL)

Enterprise Architect Certificate 

Information Technology Program Management Certificate (ITPM) 

Government Strategic Leader Certificate (GSL)

Data Strategy and Analytics Certificate (DSA)

Student Signature: Date: 

National Security and Cyberspace Studies
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Ronald J. Ivans,
Chief Financial Officer of the managing owner, Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. (the Managing Owner), of Prudential Securities Strategic Trust (the Trust), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Trusts Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date thereof (the Annual Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                             |  |  |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 
|/s/    RONALD J. IVANS                                                       |  |  |  | 
|                                                                             |  |  |  | 
|Ronald J. Ivans Chief Financial Officer of the Managing Owner March 29, 2004 |  |
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4770

To require the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service

to conduct a study to determine the lands and waters comprising the

LaBranche Wetlands in St. Charles Parish, Louisiana, and to acquire

those lands and waters for inclusion in the Bayou Sauvage Urban National Wildlife Refuge.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 14, 1994

Mr. TAUZIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To require the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service to conduct a study to determine the lands

and waters comprising the LaBranche Wetlands in St.

Charles Parish, Louisiana, and to acquire those lands

and waters for inclusion in the Bayou Sauvage Urban

National Wildlife Refuge.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4770 IH

1 SECTION 1. STUDY AND ACQUISITION OF LABRANCHE WET2 LANDS FOR INCLUSION IN BAYOU SAUVAGE

3 URBAN NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE.

4 (a) STUDY.—Not later than 6 months after the date

5 of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the United

6 States Fish and Wildlife Service (in this section referred

7 to as the ‘‘Director’’) shall conduct a study to survey and

8 determine the lands and waters that comprise the area

9 popularly known as the ‘‘LaBranche Wetlands’’, located

10 generally along Interstate 10 between New Orleans and

11 Baton Rouge in St. Charles Parish, Louisiana. The Direc12 tor shall provide an opportunity for submission by the

13 public of comments on the subject of the study. After com14 pletion of the study, the Director shall make the results

15 of the study available at offices of the United States Fish

16 and Wildlife Service in the vicinity of the LaBranche Wet17 lands.

18 (b) ACQUISITION.—

19 (1) IN GENERAL.—As soon as practicable after

20 completion of the study under subsection (a), the Di21 rector shall acquire from willing sellers the lands

22 and waters determined under subsection (a) to com23 prise the LaBranche Wetlands.

24 (2) PRICE.—As consideration for an area of

25 lands or waters acquired under this subsection, the

26 Director shall pay to the seller the fair market value
3

•HR 4770 IH

1 of the area, determined without considering restric2 tions on use of the area established under Federal

3 law after the date the seller acquired the area.

4 (c) ADDITION TO REFUGE.—Lands and waters ac5 quired by the Director under subsection (b) are included

6 in and shall be administered by the Director as part of

7 the Bayou Sauvage Urban National Wildlife Refuge.

Æ