alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Zap.Com Corporation;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors
and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
    /s/ PHILIP A. FALCONE

Philip A. FalconeChairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.253 Time and place of hearing.

The presiding officer shall specify the time and place of oral hearings. All oral hearings will take place at Commission Headquarters unless the presiding officer designates another location.

[85 FR 63178, Oct. 6, 2020]
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Joe Mark Sessums, Jr. aka Joe Mark 

Sessums

No. 06-14-00014-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the Criminal District Court 2 

of Tarrant County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

1287075D). Memorandum Opinion 

delivered by Justice Carter, Chief Justice 

Morriss and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Joe Mark Sessums, Jr., aka Joe Mark Sessums, has adequately 

indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JULY 29, 2014

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### § 101.705 Special showing for renewal of common carrier station facilities using frequency diversity.

Any application for renewal of license, for a term commencing January 1, 1975, or after, involving facilities utilizing frequency diversity must contain a statement showing compliance with § 101.103(c) or the exceptions recognized in paragraph 141 of the *First Report and Order* in Docket No. 18920 (29 FCC 2d 870). This document is available at the library of the Federal Communications Commission, located at the address of the FCC's main office indicated in 47 CFR 0.401(a). If not in compliance, a complete statement with the reasons therefore must be submitted.

[64 FR 53242, Oct. 1, 1999, as amended at 85 FR 64411, Oct. 13, 2020]
§ 24.243 The cost-sharing formula. A PCS relocator who relocates an interfering microwave link, *i.e.* one that is in all or part of its market area and in all or part of its frequency band or a voluntarily relocating microwave incumbent, is entitled to *pro rata* reimbursement based on the following formula: ( a ) *RN* equals the amount of reimbursement.
( b ) *C* equals the actual cost of relocating the link. Actual relocation costs include, but are not limited to, such items as: Radio terminal equipment (TX and/or RX—antenna, necessary feed lines, MUX/Modems); towers and/or modifications; back-up power equipment; monitoring or control equipment; engineering costs (design/path survey); installation; systems testing; FCC filing costs; site acquisition and civil works; zoning costs; training; disposal of old equipment; test equipment (vendor required); spare equipment; project management; prior coordination notification under § 101.103(d) of this chapter; site lease renegotiation; required antenna upgrades for interference control; power plant upgrade (if required); electrical grounding systems; Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) (if required); alternate transport equipment; and leased facilities. C also includes voluntarily relocating microwave incumbent's independent third party appraisal of its compensable relocation costs and incumbent transaction expenses that are directly attributable to the relocation, subject to a cap of two percent of the “hard” costs involved. C may not exceed $250,000 per link, with an additional $150,000 permitted if a new or modified tower is required.
( c ) *N* equals the number of PCS entities that would have interfered with the link. For the PCS relocator, N = 1. For the next PCS entity that would have interfered with the link, N = 2, and so on. In the case of a voluntarily relocating microwave incumbent, N = 1 for the first PCS entity that would have interfered with the link. For the next PCS entity that would have interfered with the link, N = 2, and so on.
( d ) *Tm* equals the number of months that have elapsed between the month the PCS relocator or voluntarily relocating microwave incumbent obtains reimbursement rights for the link and the month that the clearinghouse notifies a later-entrant of its reimbursement obligation for the link. A PCS relocator obtains reimbursement rights for the link on the date that it signs a relocation agreement with a microwave incumbent. A voluntarily relocating microwave incumbent obtains reimbursement rights for the link on the date that the incumbent notifies the Commission that it intends to discontinue, or has discontinued, the use of the link, pursuant to § 101.305 of the Commission's rules.
[62 FR 12757, Mar. 18, 1997, as amended at 65 FR 46113, July 27, 2000]
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 159 (Thursday, August 17, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 47484]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6967]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security


Materials Technical Advisory Committee; Notice of Partially 
Closed Meeting

    The Materials Technical Advisory Committee will meet on September 
7, 2006, 10:30 a.m., Herbert C. Hoover Building, Room 3884, 14th Street 
between Constitution & Pennsylvania Avenues, NW., Washington, DC . The 
Committee advises the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export 
Administration with respect to technical questions that affect the 
level of export controls applicable to materials and related 
technology.

Agenda

Public Session

    1. Opening remarks and introductions.
    2. Report from the composites working group.
    3. Report on latest activities from Chemical Weapons Convention.
    4. New Business

Closed Session

    5. Discussion of matters determined to be exempt from the 
provisions relating to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. app. 2 
sections 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3).

    A limited number of seats will be available during the public 
session of the meeting. Reservations are not accepted. To the extent 
time permits, members of the public may present oral statements to the 
Committee. Written statements may be submitted at any time before or 
after the meeting. However, to facilitate distribution of public 
presentation materials to Committee members, the materials should be 
forwarded prior to the meeting to Ms. Yvette Springer at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3a63494a4853545d5f487a585349145e5559145d554c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="643d1714160d0a03011624060d174a000b074a030b12">[email protected]</span></a>
    The Assistant Secretary for Administration, with the concurrence of 
the delegate of the General Counsel, formally determined on August 4, 
2006, pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 
as amended, that the portion of the meeting dealing with matters the 
premature disclosure of which would likely frustrate the implementation 
of a proposed agency action as described in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B) 
shall be exempt from the provisions relating to public meetings found 
in 5 U.S.C. app. 2 sections 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3). The remaining 
portions of the meeting will be open to the public.
    For more information, call Yvette Springer at (202) 482-4814.

    Dated: August 10, 2006.
Yvette Springer,
Committee Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 06-6967 Filed 8-16-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-JT-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 11-9576.

#### Ivory *v.*Alabama.

Ct. Crim. App. Ala. Certiorari denied.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, EPA proposes to amend 40 CFR part 49 as 

follows:

PART 49—INDIAN COUNTRY: AIR QUALITY PLANNING AND 

MANAGEMENT 

1. Authority: The authority citation for part 49 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq. 

2. Section 49.151 is amended by revising paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(A) and (B) to read 

as follows:

§49.151 Program overview.

* * * * *

(c) * * * 

(1) * * *

(iii) * * *

(A) If you own or operate an existing true minor source in Indian country (as 

defined in 40 CFR 49.152(d)), you must register your source with the reviewing authority 

in your area by March 1, 2013. If your true minor source is not an oil and natural gas 

source, and you commence construction after August 30, 2011, and before September 2, 

2014, you must also register your source with the reviewing authority in your area within 

90 days after the source begins operation. If your true minor source is an oil and natural 

gas source, and you commence construction after August 30, 2011, and before October 3, 

2016, you must register your source with the reviewing authority in your area within 90 

days after the source begins operation. You are exempt from these registration 

requirements if your true minor source is subject to §49.138.

Deleted: March 2
Page 2 of 2

(B) If your true minor source is not an oil and natural gas source and you wish to 

begin construction of a new true minor source or a modification at an existing true minor 

source on or after September 2, 2014, you must first obtain a permit pursuant to §§49.154 

and 49.155 (or a general permit/permit by rule pursuant to §49.156, if applicable). If your 

true minor source is an oil and natural gas source and you wish to begin construction of a 

new true minor source or a modification at an existing true minor source on or after 

October 3, 2016, you must first obtain a permit pursuant to §§49.154 and 49.155 (or a 

general permit/permit by rule pursuant to §49.156, if applicable). The proposed new 

source or modification will also be subject to the registration requirements of §49.160, 

except for sources that are subject to §49.138.

3. Section 49.160 is amended by revising paragraph (c)(1)(ii) to read as follows:

§49.160 Registration program for minor sources in Indian country.

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

(1) * * * 

(i) * * * 

(ii) If your true minor source is not an oil and natural gas source and you commence 

construction after August 30, 2011, and before September 2, 2014, you must register your 

source with the reviewing authority within 90 days after the source begins operation. If 

your true minor source is an oil and natural gas source, and you commence construction 

after August 30, 2011, and before October 3, 2016, you must register your source with 

the reviewing authority within 90 days after the source begins operation.

Deleted: March 2

Deleted: March 2
182A15-2

#### State v. Adam Jarmal Hodge

Def’s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Mandamus*

Dismissed
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Commodity Credit Corporation

# SUMMARY:

The Commodity Credit Corporation is notifying the public of a change in address for hand delivery (including FedEx, DHL, UPS, etc.) of applications for the programs referenced above. Deliver to: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service, Marketing Operations Staff, 1400 Independence Ave., SW., Room 4932 South Building, Washington, DC 20250-1042.

# DATES:

All applications for the TASC program for the February 1 deadline must be received by 5 p.m. eastern standard time February 1, 2006. All applications for the QSP, MAP, FMD, and EMP programs must be received by 5 p.m. eastern standard time, March 13, 2006.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Entities wishing to apply for funding assistance should contact the Marketing Operations Staff, Foreign Agricultural Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1400 Independence Ave., SW., STOP 1042, Washington, DC 20250-1042, phone: (202) 720-4327, fax: (202) 720-9361, e-mail:                         *mosadmin@fas.usda.gov*. Information is also available on the Foreign Agricultural Service Web site at                         *http://www.fas.usda.gov/​mos/​marketdev.asp*.                    

      ( print page 4101)    
Signed at Washington, DC, on January 18, 2006.

A. Ellen Terpstra,

Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service and Vice President, Commodity Credit Corporation.

[FR Doc. 06-679 Filed 1-24-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-10-M
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12
 
                    CASE CREDIT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                     --------------------------
                                                       1997     1996     1995
                                                     -------- -------- --------
<S>                                                  <C>      <C>      <C>
Net Income.......................................... $     82 $     85 $     94
Add:
  Interest expense..................................       98       72       42
  Amortization of capitalized debt expense..........        1        2        2
  Portion of rentals representative of interest fac-
   tor..............................................      --       --       --
  Income tax expense and other taxes on income......       40       45       53
  Fixed charges of unconsolidated subsidiaries......      --       --       --
  Extraordinary items...............................      --         3      --
                                                     -------- -------- --------
    Earnings as defined............................. $    221 $    207 $    191
                                                     ======== ======== ========
Interest expense.................................... $     98 $     72 $     42
Amortization of capitalized debt expense............        1        2        2
Portion of rentals representative of interest fac-
 tor................................................      --       --       --
Fixed charges of unconsolidated subsidiaries........      --       --       --
                                                     -------- -------- --------
    Fixed charges as defined........................ $     99 $     74 $     44
                                                     ======== ======== ========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges..................    2.23x    2.80x    4.34x
                                                     ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
#### Edward E. Champlin *vs.*Harry Tanger.

JANUARY 6, 1947.

Present: Flynn, C. J., Moss, Capotosto, Baker and Condon, JJ.

*285Condon, J.

This is an action of deceit which was tried to a justice of the superior court sitting without a jury and resulted in a decision for the plaintiff. The case is here on defendant’s exception to that decision.

Under his exception defendant presses but one contention, namely, that the trial justice’s decision is against the evidence. The one point in the case is, as stated in his brief, “did the defendant with knowledge of its falsity, make a false representation of a material fact for the purpose of inducing the plaintiff to act upon the representation, and did he rely and act upon it to his damage? If the answer is in the affirmative, the law seems quite clear that the plaintiff should recover.”

The trial justice apparently was of the opinion that, on the evidence, the above question should be answered in the affirmative and he found for the plaintiff. His decision, which was delivered from the bench immediately upon the conclusion of the evidence, is indeed couched in language of the utmost brevity, but it as clearly reflects his judgment upon the weight and credibility of the defendant’s testimony as if he had commented at greater length. He said: “The defendant denies everything. He doesn’t owe a cent. Decision for the plaintiff for $345.00.” The obvious irony of the second sentence, appearing as it does between the other two, speaks volumes for the trial justice’s view of the defendant’s credibility.

We have carefully read the transcript and we cannot say that the trial justice was clearly wrong either in that view or in his final conclusion that defendant was guilty of deceit. From the evidence, which consists solely of testimony of defendant on the one side and plaintiff and a corroborating witness on the other, it could reasonably be found that defendant had falsely represented his financial condition to the plaintiff; that the latter relied upon such false represen*286tations; and that, to his damage, he extended credit to the defendant. Under the well-established rule in cases of this kind we cannot disturb the trial justice’s decision.

*William H. Leslie, Jr.,*for plaintiff.

*Isadore S. Horenstein,*for defendant.

Defendant’s exception is overruled, and the case is remitted to the superior court for entry of judgment on the decision.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.60000 Purpose.

The purpose of this subpart is to implement the Enhanced Competition Incentive Program (ECIP), a program designed to incentivize Qualifying Transactions in the Wireless Radio Services to increase spectrum access for small carriers and Tribal Nations and to increase competition, and also facilitate the provision of advanced telecommunications services in rural areas by eligible entities.
#### BIGGS et al. v. JOSHUA HENDY CORPORATION.

No. 12257.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Feb. 2, 1951.

*448Mohr & Borstein and Perry Bertram, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants Biggs et al.

Thelen, Marrin, Johnson & Bridges and Robert H. Sanders, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant Joshua Hendy Corp.

Before HEALY, ORR and POPE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On the 28th day of June, 1950, we filed an opinion in this case1 wherein we reserved final determination in order to afford counsel for the respective parties an opportunity to be heard on the question of the constitutional validity of the retroactive provisions of § 216(b) of Title 29, U.S.C.A. No response was made by appellant or by appellee. However, briefs on behalf of the United States of America pursuant to permission to intervene, and of Pacific Maritime Association as amicus curiae, were filed. The identical question presented in this case was decided by this court in the case of Moss v. Hawaiian Dredging Company, 9 Cir., 187 F.2d 442 wherein the constitutionality of the retroactive provisions of § 216(b) was upheld. The question reserved for consideration in the case of Edward R. Biggs, John R. Hector, J. H. Lueder and Martin M. Moreno, Appellants, v. Joshua Hendy Corporation, Appellee, No. 12,257, having been disposed of by this court, the judgment entered in said case No. 12,257, is reversed, and the cause remanded with instructions to the trial court to enter judgment in accordance with the views expressed in the opinion filed on June 28, 1950.

Reversed.

1

. 183 F.2d 515.