alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 30.2 Definitions.

The following definitions apply to this part:

*Authorized bandwidth.* The maximum width of the band of frequencies permitted to be used by a station. This is normally considered to be the necessary or occupied bandwidth, whichever is greater. (See § 2.202 of this chapter).

*Authorized frequency.* The frequency, or frequency range, assigned to a station by the Commission and specified in the instrument of authorization.

*Fixed satellite earth station.* An earth station intended to be used at a specified fixed point.

*Local Area Operations.* Operations confined to physical facility boundaries, such as a factory.

*Point-to-Multipoint Hub Station.* A fixed point-to-multipoint radio station that provides one-way or two-way communication with fixed Point-to-Multipoint Service User Stations.

*Point-to-Multipoint Service.* A fixed point-to-multipoint radio service consisting of point-to-multipoint hub stations that communicate with fixed point-to-multipoint user stations.

*Point-to-Multipoint User Station.* A fixed radio station located at users' premises, lying within the coverage area of a Point-to-Multipoint Hub station, using a directional antenna to receive one-way communications from or providing two-way communications with a fixed Point-to-Multipoint Hub Station.

*Point-to-point station.* A station that transmits a highly directional signal from a fixed transmitter location to a fixed receive location.

*Portable device.* Transmitters designed to be used within 20 centimeters of the body of the user.

*Prior coordination.* A bilateral process conducted prior to filing applications which includes the distribution of the technical parameters of a proposed radio system to potentially affected parties for their evaluation and timely response.

*Secondary operations.* Radio communications which may not cause interference to operations authorized on a primary basis and which are not protected from interference from these primary operations

*Transportable station.* Transmitting equipment that is not intended to be used while in motion, but rather at stationary locations.

*Universal Licensing System.* The Universal Licensing System (ULS) is the consolidated database, application filing system, and processing system for all Wireless Radio Services. ULS supports electronic filing of all applications and related documents by applicants and licensees in the Wireless Radio Services, and provides public access to licensing information.
**EXHIBIT 31.2** **RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)/CERTIFICATIONS OF CFO**I, Jon Gerlach, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of IKONICS Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting. 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.        Date:  November 9, 2007 /s/ Jon Gerlach   Jon Gerlach     Chief Financial Officer  and Vice President of Finance
Chief Data Officer 

Graduate Certificate

The Chief Data Officer (CDO) Certificate provides accredited graduate-level education for those involved in 

establishing, enabling, or running programs related to data strategies, data governance, data analytics, or data 

management across the Department of Defense and federal government.

The program is designed for students with diverse undergraduate backgrounds and work experience to become 

strategic leaders.

Important Facts:

• Tuition-Free for DoD Personnel 

(Military and Civilian)

• Fully Remote and Part-Time

• Self-Nominated

Minimum Admissions Eligibility Criteria:

• Bachelor’s Degree (3.0 GPA minimum)

• Federal Civil Service pay grade GS-13 equivalent or 

above.

• Military: 

• Enlisted: E-7 and above

• Chief Warrant Officer: CW3 and above

• Officer: O-4 and above

Courses Required (3 credit hours each)

CIC-6420 Data Analytics for Leaders

CIC-6414 Data Management Strategies and 

Technologies

CIC-6419 Data Strategy and Governance

CIC- 6443 Emerging and Disruptive

Technologies

CIC-6415 Strategic Information Technology

Acquisition

For more information refer to: 

Website: cic.ndu.edu

Phone number: 202-685-6300

Email: cicoss@ndu.edu

Attend our Monthly Virtual Open House for prospective students on the 4th Thursday of every month @ 1pm – 2pm EST

https://us.bbcollab.com/guest/886062331bd3403f8bd9a2ac591ddc3a or +1-571-392-7650 PIN: 125 656 9347

Successful CDO graduates will be able to: 

 

• Apply data analytics tools and methodologies ondata 

sets and communicate results with impactful 

visualizations.

• Advocate and communicate data sharing practices 

through organizational culture, policies, and systems 

development process, while fulfilling legal andethical 

obligations of data ownership.

• Evaluate enabling technologies and enterprise/data 

architectures to address requirements for data 

analytics programs, including real-time Big Data 

processing and machine learning/predictive analytic 

capabilities.

• Create a data analytics program through data 

governance initiatives that support all data life-cycle 

considerations (e.g., authoritative source 

consolidation, updating, purging/avoiding sprawl, and 

archival).

• Employ emerging technologies (and underlying data) 

to enhance data-driven decision-making forstrategic 

effect.

• Identify, shape, and formulate Data Strategies that 

ensure data availability and transparency,supporting 

multi-agency and/or multi-national collaboration.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to 10 U.S.C.  Section  1350 as adopted  pursuant to Section 1350 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  in  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of
Electronic  Game Card,  Inc. on Form  10-QSB/A  for the period  ending March 31,
2005, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report") for Electronic Game Card, Inc., (the "Company"),  the undersigned
hereby certifies that:

(1)      to the  best of my  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with  the
         requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

(2)      to the best of my knowledge,  the  information  contained in the Report
         fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and
         result of operations of the Company.

March 7, 2006


/S/ LINDEN J. BOYNE
--------------------------------------------
    LINDEN J. BOYNE  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Editorial Note on Subpart H of Part 51
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart H of part 51 appear at 66 FR 26806, May 15, 2001.

§ 51.703 Non-Access reciprocal compensation obligation of LECs. ( a ) Each LEC shall establish Non-Access Reciprocal Compensation arrangements for transport and termination of Non-Access Telecommunications Traffic with any requesting telecommunications carrier.
( b ) A LEC may not assess charges on any other telecommunications carrier for Non-Access Telecommunications Traffic that originates on the LEC's network.
( c ) Notwithstanding any other provision of the Commission's rules, a LEC shall be entitled to assess and collect the full charges for the transport and termination of Non-Access Telecommunications Traffic, regardless of whether the local exchange carrier assessing the applicable charges itself delivers such traffic to the called party's premises or delivers the call to the called party's premises via contractual or other arrangements with an affiliated or unaffiliated provider of interconnected VoIP service, as defined in 47 U.S.C. 153(25), or a non-interconnected VoIP service, as defined in 47 U.S.C. 153(36), that does not itself seek to collect Non-Access Reciprocal Compensation charges for the transport and termination of that Non-Access Telecommunications Traffic. In no event may the total charges that a LEC may assess for such service to the called location exceed the applicable transport and termination rate. For purposes of this section, the facilities used by the LEC and affiliated or unaffiliated provider of interconnected VoIP service or a non-interconnected VoIP service for the transport and termination of such traffic shall be deemed an equivalent facility under § 51.701.
[76 FR 73855, Nov. 29, 2011]
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Palomar Enterprises, Inc., a
Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March
31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Brent Fouch, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  May  17,  2004.

                                     By  /s/Brent Fouch
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Brent Fouch,
                                       Chief Financial Officer of
                                       Palomar Enterprises, Inc.


<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 161 (Monday, August 21, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48576-48577]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7065]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Public Notice for Waiver of Aeronautical Land-Use Assurance 
Freeman Municipal Airport, Seymour, IN

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent of waiver with respect to land.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is giving notice 
that a portion of the airport (a northern portion of Parcel 5, 1.427 
acres located northeast of the intersection of First Avenue and G 
Avenue East, presently used for neither aeronautical or agricultural 
use) is not needed for aeronautical use, as shown on the Airport Layout 
Plan. There are no impacts to the airport by allowing the airport to 
dispose of the property. Parcel E was acquired in September 27, 1948, 
under Quit Claim Deed from the United States of America to the Seymour 
Aviation Commission (recorded in Deed Record 93, pp. 405-419 in the 
Recorder's Office of Jackson County, Indiana). In accordance with 
section 47107(h) of title 49, United States Code,

[[Page 48577]]

this notice is required to be published in the Federal Register 30 days 
before modifying the land-use assurance that requires the property to 
be used for an aeronautical purpose. The release of this portion of 
Parcel 5 will allow the Freeman Municipal Airport to sell the land to a 
manufacturing company currently leasing the adjacent property.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 20, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bobb Beauchamp, Environmental Program 
Manager, 2300 East Devon Avenue, Des Plaines, IL 60018. Telephone 
Number 847-294-7364/FAX Number 847-294-7046. Documents reflecting this 
FAA action may be reviewed at this same location or at Freeman 
Municipal Airport, Seymour, Indiana.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice announces that the FAA intends 
to authorize the disposal of the subject airport property at Freeman 
Municipal Airport, Seymour, Indiana. Approval does not constitute a 
commitment by the FAA to financially assist in disposal of the subject 
airport property nor a determination that all measures covered by the 
program are eligible for grant-in-aid funding from the FAA. The 
disposition of proceeds from the disposal of the airport property will 
be in accordance with FAA's Policy and Procedures Concerning the Use of 
Airport Revenue, published in the Federal Register on February 16, 
1999.

    Issued in Des Plaines, Illinois on July 13, 2006.
Larry Ladendorf,
Acting Manager, Chicago Airports District Office, FAA, Great Lakes 
Region.
[FR Doc. 06-7065 Filed 8-18-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### §§ 1.1937-1.1939 [Reserved]
<PAGE>
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report of Celadon Group, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Paul A.
Will, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Assistant Treasurer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.
1350), that to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
   the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
   respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



                                               /s/ Paul A. Will
                                               ----------------
                                                   Paul A. Will
                                           Chief Financial Officer,
                                       Secretary and Assistant Treasurer

September 30, 2002
No. 11-9321.

#### Chandler v. Illinois.

App. Ct. Ill., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.
J.

to the master and the parenting coordinator. Because the November order did not affect the rights of the parties growing out of the prior orders establishing custody, we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

J. Parraguirre

cc: Hon Lisa M. Brown, District Judge Julie Hammer Black & LoBello Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2

(0) 1947A
No. 10-10874.

#### Thompson *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### S. K. S. Holding Company, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida, *Plaintiff in Error,*vs. Marian Fell Vans Agnew, as Executrix of the Last Will and Testament of P. A. Vans Agnew, deceased, *Defendant in Error.*

143 So. 599.

Opinion filed September 28, 1932.

Petition for rehearing denied October 24, 1932.

*John H. Wahl*and *A. J. Pussier,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*George P. Garrett,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

In an action on promissory notes brought against the executrix of an accommodation endorser by one to whom the notes were transferred after their maturity, the court directed a verdict for defendant at the close of the plaintiff’s testimony, and judgment was rendered for the defendant. A motion for new trial was denied and plaintiff took writ of error.

There was1 evidence of a consideration passing to the *831maker, and of tke signature of the endorser; and also evidence from which delivery of the notes to the payee after the endorsement of the defendant’s testator could have been inferred as against the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. Though the defendant pleaded that the endorsements of the notes were never completed by delivery, the presumption of delivery afforded by Section 6776, C. G. L., operated to support the inference of delivery after endorsement to be drawn from the evidence adduced by the plaintiff. Under the statute delivery of the notes “is presumed until the contrary is proved,” so the notes were erroneously excluded as evidence on the ground that delivery was not proven. Error was committed in directing a verdict for the defendant, for which the judgment is reversed.

Reversed.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J. J., concur.
No. 11-5673.

#### Overby *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Yves C. Renaud, Director, President, and CFO of BIMS Renewable Energy Inc. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.  This quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Yves C. Renaud

Yves C. Renaud

Director, President, CFO



Date: May 11, 2004



































11
Exhibit 24



POWER OF ATTORNEY



KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints John H. Eyler, Jr., Raymond L. Arthur and Christopher K. Kay and
each of them, his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Toys R Us, Inc. for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2005, and any amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting
unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform such and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person,
hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.



This Power of Attorney may be executed in separate counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all such counterparts shall
together constitute one and the same instrument.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of
the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney as of April, 2005.



|                   |  |          |  |                       
|------------------ |  | -------- |  | ----------------------
|Name               |  | Title    |  | Signature             
|RoAnn Costin       |  | Director |  | /s/ RoAnn Costin      
|                   |  |         
|Roger N. Farah     |  | Director |  | /s/ Roger N. Farah    
|                   |  |         
|Peter A. Georgescu |  | Director |  | /s/ Peter A. Georgescu
|                   |  |         
|Cinda A. Hallman   |  | Director |  | /s/ Cinda A. Hallman  
|                   |  |         
|Calvin Hill        |  | Director |  | /s/ Calvin Hill       
|                   |  |         
|Nancy Karch        |  | Director |  | /s/ Nancy Karch       
|                   |  |         
|Norman S. Matthews |  | Director |  | /s/ Norman S. Matthews
|                   |  |         
|Arthur B. Newman   |  | Director |  | /s/ Arthur B. Newman  
|                   |  |         
|Frank R. Noonan    |  | Director |  | /s/ Frank R. Noonan
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1059 CAF 11-01092 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, FAHEY, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF KENDALL L. DANNER, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CHAD NEPAGE, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

----------------------------------- THEODORE W. STENUF, ESQ., ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

LINDA M. CAMPBELL, SYRACUSE (H. DANA VAN HEE OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
THEODORE W. STENUF, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, MINOA, APPELLANT PRO SE.
SHIRLEY A. GORMAN, BROCKPORT, FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Appeals from an order of the Family Court, Oswego County (Kimberly M. Seager, J.), entered March 24, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order dismissed the petition. It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same Memorandum as in Danner v NePage ([appeal No. 3] ___ AD3d ___ [Nov. 9, 2012]).

Entered: November 9, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
301P15

#### House of Raeford Farms, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of Environmental and Natural Resources

1. Respondent’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA15-47)

1. Allowed 08/26/2015

2. Respondent’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

*2.*

3. Respondent’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

3.