alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 842/2005

of 1 June 2005         

amending the representative prices and additional duties for the import of certain products in the sugar sector fixed by Regulation (EC) No 1210/2004 for the 2004/2005 marketing year

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1423/95 of 23 June 1995 laying down detailed implementing rules for the import of products in the sugar sector other than molasses (2), and in particular the second sentence of the second subparagraph of Article 1(2), and Article 3(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The representative prices and additional duties on imports of the products referred to in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1423/95, as fixed by Regulation (EC) No 1210/2004 for the 2004/2005 marketing year are hereby amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 2 June 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 1 June 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

(2)OJ L 141, 24.6.1995, p. 16. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 624/98 (OJ L 85, 20.3.1998, p. 5).

(3)OJ L 232, 1.7.2004, p. 11.

(4)OJ L 49, 22.2.2005, p. 7.

----

ANNEX

Amended representative prices and additional duties applicable to imports of white sugar, raw sugar and products covered by CN code 1702 90 99  applicable from 2 June 2005

----

(1)  Fixed for the standard quality defined in Annex I.II to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 (OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1).

(2)  Fixed for the standard quality defined in Annex I.I to Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001.

(3)  Fixed per 1 % sucrose content.

----
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 06-1120 

________________________________________________________________________ 

SCIENTIFIC COOPERATION 

Earth Sciences 

 Memorandum of Understanding 

Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and INDONESIA 

Signed at Jakarta November 20, 2006 

with 

Annexes 

 and 

Protocol Extending the 

Memorandum of Understanding 

Signed at Jakarta November 15, 2011 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 INDONESIA 

 

 Scientific Cooperation: Earth Sciences 

 Memorandum of understanding signed at 

 Jakarta November 20, 2006; 

 Entered into force November 20, 2006. 

 With annexes. 

 And protocol extending the 

 memorandum of understanding. 

 Signed at Jakarta November 15, 2011; 

 Entered into force November 15, 2011.
EXHIBIT 99.8



CONSENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSE COOPERS LLP



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2017 of PolyMet Mining Corp. (the Company”) of our report dated March 27, 2018 relating to the consolidated financial statements of the Company and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in the Exhibit incorporated by reference in this Annual Report.



We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form S-8 (No. 333- 192208) of the Company of our report dated March 27, 2018 referred to above.

 

(Signed) “PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP”

 

Chartered Professional Accountants

Vancouver, British Columbia



March 27, 2018
§ 27.1218 Broadband Radio Service designated entity provisions. ( a ) *Eligibility for small business provisions.* ( 1 ) A small business is an entity that, together with all attributed parties, has average gross revenues that are not more than $40 million for the preceding three years.
( 2 ) A very small business is an entity that, together with all attributed parties, has average gross revenues that are not more than $15 million for the preceding three years.
( 3 ) An entrepreneur is an entity that, together with all attributed parties, has average gross revenues that are not more than $3 million for the preceding three years.
( b ) *Bidding credits.* ( 1 ) A winning bidder that qualifies as a small business, as defined in this section, or a consortium of small businesses, may use a bidding credit of 15 percent, as specified in § 1.2110(f)(2)(iii) of this chapter, to lower the cost of its winning bid on any of the licenses in this subpart.
( 2 ) A winning bidder that qualifies as a very small business, as defined in this section, or a consortium of very small businesses, may use a bidding credit of 25 percent, as specified in § 1.2110(f)(2)(ii) of this chapter, to lower the cost of its winning bid on any of the licenses in this subpart.
( 3 ) A winning bidder that qualifies as an entrepreneur, as defined in this section, or a consortium of entrepreneurs, may use a bidding credit of 15 percent, as specified in § 1.2110(f)(2)(i) of this chapter, to lower the cost of its winning bid on any of the licenses in this subpart.
[73 FR 26041, May 8, 2008]
§ 302-12.113 What must we do when planning, establishing, and administering a RSC contract? ( a ) When planning and establishing a RSC contract, you must structure the contract so that it provides the best possible value to the Government, considering costs, tax implications, morale, mobility, employee choice, productivity, and any other relevant considerations. For most agencies and most relocations, this structure will include the possibility of a BVO sale or an amended value sale.
( b ) Once you have a RSC contract, you must monitor costs and tax consequences and make adjustments as necessary, to ensure that your homesale program continues to provide the same best value to the Government.
[FTR Amdt. 2011-01, 76 FR 18344, Apr. 1, 2011]
No. 11-10018.

#### Isaac *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 32.6511 Property held for future telecommunications use expense.

This account shall include expenses associated with property held for future telecommunications use.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-108747, 333-94871, and 333-64503 of Island Pacific, Inc. and subsidiaries on
Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-43626 on Form S-3 of our report,
dated June 11, 2004, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Island
Pacific, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended March 31, 2004.

SINGER LEWAK GREENBAUM & GOLDSTEIN LLP
Los Angeles, CA
June 11, 2004
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 2.813 Transmitters operated in the Instructional Television Fixed Service.

Section 2.803 (a) through (d) shall not be applicable to a transmitter operated in the Instructional Television Fixed Service regulated under part 74 of this chapter, provided the conditions in § 74.952 of this chapter for the acceptability of such transmitter for licensing are met.

[62 FR 10470, Mar. 7, 1997]
§ 73.855 Ownership limits. ( a ) No authorization for an LPFM station shall be granted to any party if the grant of that authorization will result in any such party holding an attributable interest in two or more LPFM stations.
( b ) Notwithstanding the general prohibition set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, Tribal Applicants, as defined in § 73.853(c), may hold an attributable interest in up to two LPFM stations.
( c ) Notwithstanding the general prohibition set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, not-for-profit organizations and governmental entities with a public safety purpose may be granted multiple licenses if: ( 1 ) One of the multiple applications is submitted as a priority application; and
( 2 ) The remaining non-priority applications do not face a mutually exclusive challenge.
[78 FR 2107, Jan. 9, 2013]
No. 11-5265.

#### Gerken *v.*Wisconsin.

Ct. App. Wis. Certio-rari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 165 (Friday, August 25, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 50391]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7143]



[[Page 50391]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[No. DOD-2006-OS-0059]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by 
September 25, 2006.
    Title, Associated Form and OMB Number: ``Request for Armed Forces 
Participation in Public Events (Non-Aviation),'' DD Form 2536, and 
``Request for Military Aerial Support,'' DD Form 2535, OMB Control 
Number 0704-0290.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 43,000.
    Responses per Respondents: 1.
    Annual Responses: 43,000.
    Average Burden Per Response: 8 minutes (average).
    Annual Burden Hours: 5,537.
    Needs and Uses: The information collection requirement is necessary 
to evaluate the eligibility of events to receive Armed Forces community 
relations support and to determine whether requested military asset are 
available.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households; not-for-profit 
institutions; Federal Government; and state, local or tribal 
government.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Hillary Jaffe.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Ms. Jaffe at the Office of Management and 
Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by the following method:
    <bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency 
name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The 
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the 
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the 
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without 
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD/Information Management 
Division, 1777 North Kent Street, RPN, Suite 11000, Arlington, VA 
22209-2133.

    Dated: August 18, 2006.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register, Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 06-7143 Filed 8-24-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
#### § 30.1 Creation of upper microwave flexible use service, scope and authority.

As of December 14, 2016, Local Multipoint Distribution Service licenses for the 27.5-28.35 GHz band, and licenses issued in the 38.6-40 GHz band under part 101 of this chapter shall be reassigned to the Upper Microwave Flexible Use Service. Local Multipoint Distribution Service licenses in bands other than 27.5-28.35 GHz shall remain in that service and shall be governed by the part 101 of this chapter applicable to that service.
#### DOCTEROFF v. NEW YORK CREDIT MEN’S ADJUSTMENT BUREAU, Inc.

No. 169, Docket 21899.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Jan. 2, 1951.

Decided Jan. 19, 1951.

Max Schwartz and William Rudin, Brooklyn, for appellant.

Harry A. Margolis and Hahn & Golin, New York City, for appellee.

Before L. HAND, Chief Judge, and SWAN and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.

PER CUEIAM.

On February 15, 1950, Docteroff testified before the referee that he had records which would show how many dozen slips were at his factory at Brentwood, in contradiction of a written statement of an officer of the bankrupt who declared that he had counted 400 dozen. His words were: “I have a record of what came in and what went out and the difference should prove that”: *i. e.*that the amount on hand was not as great as 400 dozen. At the same hearing, when questioned as to how many slips he had sold (incidentally he had no right to sell any) he testified: “I have a record of everything that was sold and it does not even come to the labor figure”: *i. e.*the amount that he had paid for laboi upon the bankrupt's material. He swore that he had copies of the bills on which he sold these goods. Again, when asked whether “the records of the Marilyn Undergarment (his company) would show just when you started to do- work,” he answered that he had such records. The records which he produced do not satisfy these descriptions; they show nothing about any goods sold except one voucher for $450 which he says was for fifty dozen; and he does not suggest that it accounts for all that in fact he did sell. Again the records produced do not show “what came in and what went out”; on the contrary they show delivery to the bankrupt of *more*than Docteroff had received- — not counting the goods wrongfully sold. Possibly we should say that the first “cutting card” answered the description of a record which showed when he started work for the bankrupt; but that is all that by the utmost stretch he can be held to have produced.

In the face of this failure to produce papers answering the testimony, it is idle to argue that he has complied with the referee’s order. The conclusion is inescapable that either what he said upon the hearing -was not true, or that papers which then *5existed have disappeared. Until he can give some rational explanation of this conflict between his testimony and his conduct, he can only be treated as in contempt; he cannot purge himself, unless he satisfies the referee that his original testimony was false, or that the missing papers have been lost. It is always open to him to ask for another hearing before the referee in order to make such an explanation; 'but in its absence we see no reason to intervene. However, our decision is not to be understood to limit the power of the district court at any time to deal with the situation as in its discretion it deems just.

Orders affirmed.
§ 80.1109 Distress, urgency, and safety communications. ( a ) Distress traffic consists of all messages relating to the immediate assistance required by the ship in distress, including search and rescue communications and on-scene communications. Distress traffic must as far as possible be on the frequencies contained in § 80.1077.
( b ) Urgency and safety communications include: navigational and meteorological warnings and urgent information; ship-to-ship safety navigation communications; ship reporting communications; support communications for search and rescue operations; other urgency and safety messages and communications relating to the navigation, movements and needs of ships and weather observation messages destined for an official meteorological service.
( c ) Intership navigation safety communications are those VHF radiotelephone communications conducted between ships for the purpose of contributing to the safe movement of ships. The frequency 156.650 MHz is used for intership navigation safety communications (see § 80.1077).
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4671 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4671

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide direct loans and set-
                     asides for disabled veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 28, 1994

Mr. Sangmeister ( by request) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide direct loans and set-
                     asides for disabled veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That (a) chapter 37 of 
title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following new subchapter:

      ``Subchapter VI--Direct Loans to Qualified Disabled Veterans

``Sec. 3781. Establishment of program
    ``(a) The Secretary, under such regulations as the Secretary shall 
prescribe, shall establish a program to make loans to qualified 
disabled veterans to aid such veterans in establishing their own 
businesses.
    ``(b) Under the program established pursuant to subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall operate a set-aside program for disabled veteran owned 
businesses. For the purposes of this subsection, the program shall have 
authority substantially equivalent to the authority vested in the 
Administrator of the Small Business Administration by section 8(a) of 
the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(a)), and the Secretary may enter 
into, and arrange the performance of, contracts in the same manner as 
such contracts are entered into and arranged under such section 8(a).
    ``(c) Requirements that apply to Federal departments and agencies 
in the letting of contracts under section 8(a) of the Small Business 
Act shall also apply to such departments and agencies in the letting of 
contracts under this subchapter.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning 
of chapter 37 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at 
the end the following:

      ``SUBCHAPTER VI--DIRECT LOANS TO QUALIFIED DISABLED VETERANS

``Sec.
``3781. Establishment of program.''.
                                 <all>
```
375P09-4

#### State v. Avenger Ridgeway

Def’s *Pro Se*Motion for Petition to Toss Out Violent Habitual Law

Dismissed
### 50:1 Content 

### Y'M Customer (Location) Capacity Inlet Outlet mod 

# ... 

# "" OlitJama Refirill] co, Ire (Onahzrna,**J~Zfl)** 

# "." '" "" ENEL (Sulcis, *3, Ilafl) 240x1 

### 5.7011 

# • ""**Ni~m** Petmleun Renring Co ,Ltd. 

### (OsitG,**J~Zfl)** 149x1 

### 2.219 

# ,

"''' K315 

### ai Electric Power Co, Ire. (Gooo #3, Japan) 60[t{1 

# '" 

# ,

"''' COSMO 

# a LCo ,Ltd (Yffikaichi,**J~Zfl)** 22&1 

### ',<D 

# "

"''' Kaohima N**~m** Electric PCII'Ier Co (Kashm aj.(ila**#3,J~an)** 300X 1/2 

# " 

# .. " 'ro>'**Ni~m** Petmleun Renring Co ,Ltd. (Maifu, Japan) 14e«1 

# ,,"" " 'ro>'**Ni~m** Petmleun Renring Co ,Ltd. (MLrOran, Japan)**~~,** 

## "", 

# '" ,ro;' T EflOOffiOO V a!b' uthorh' (Parcdis e Fos sil Plart tfj 

## JJ S 

## J 1,060x 1 

### 2.121 

# '"
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. R YAN DEON W ILLIAM S GOM EZ, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 13-50468

D.C . No. 2:13-c r-00425-R M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia M anue l L. R e a l , Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d July 21, 2015 ** B e fore : C ANB Y, B EA, a nd M UR GUIA, C irc uit Judge s. R y an De on W illia

m s Gom e z a

ppe a ls from

the distric t

c ourt’ s judgm e nt a

nd c ha lle nge s his guilty -ple a c onvic tion a

nd 41-m onth se nte nc e for c o nspira c y to c om m it ba nk fra ud, in viola

tion of 18 U.S.C . § 1349. Pursua nt to Ande rs v . C alifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Gom e z ’ s c ounse l ha s file d a brie f stating tha t 

# FIL ED JUL 28 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).the re are no grounds for re lie f, a long with a m otion to withdra w a s c ounse l of re c o rd. W e have p rovide d Gom e z the opportunity to file a pro se supple m e nta l brie f. No pro se supple m e nta l brie f or answe ring brie f ha s be e n file d. The c ourt ha s c onside re d Gom e z ’ s pro se le tte r file d on M ay 8, 2015. Gom e z wa ive d his right to a ppe a l his c onvic tion, with the e xc e ption of a

n a ppe a l ba se d on a

c la im that his ple a

wa s involunta

ry . Gom e z a lso wa ive d the right to a ppe a l six spe c ifie d issue s re late d to his sente nc e . Our indepe nde nt re vie w of the re c ord pursua

nt to Pe n son v . Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), disc lose s no argua b le grounds for re lie f a s to thevolunta rine ss of Gom e z ’ s ple a or any se nte nc ing issueoutsidethe sc ope of the a p p e a l wa ive r. W e the re fore a ffirm a s to those issue s. W e dism iss there m a inde r of the a p pe a l in light of the

va lid a ppe a l wa ive r. Se eUnite d State

s v . W atson , 582 F.3d 974, 988 (9th C ir. 2009). C ounse l’ s m otion to withdra w is G RANT E D. AFFIRM E D in par t; DISM ISSE D in par t.

1 3 - 5 0 4 6 8 2
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CFO AS REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14 or 15d-14 OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHAGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 302 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Zap.Com Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
    
 15