alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT GOENAWAN B OEDIJONO; M EYKE M AR GARETHA, Pe titione rs, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 13-70805 Age n c y Nos. A096-362-468 A099-887-499 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d Oc tobe r 14, 2014 * * B e fore : LEAVY, GOULD, a n d B ER Z ON, C irc uit Judge s . Goe na wan B o e dijono a

nd M e yk e M argare tha , nat ive s and c itiz e ns of Indone sia , pe tition for re vie w of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) de nia l of the i r m otion to re ope n re m ova l proc e e dings. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 

# F IL ED OCT 20 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2). Thus, we de ny R e n’ s re que st for ora l a rgum e nt.8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re v ie w for a buse of disc re tion theB IA’ s de nia l of a m otion to re ope n, N

ajmabadi v . Holde r , 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th C ir. 2010), a nd we de ny the p e tition for re v i e w. The B IA did not a

buse its disc re tion in deny ing pe titione rs’ m otion to re ope n a s untim e ly

be c a use the m otion wa s file d ove r thre e y e a rs a fte r the B IA’ s fina l de c i sion, se e 8 C .F.R . § 1003.2(c )(2), and the y fa ile d to e sta blish m at e ria lly c ha nge d c irc um s ta

nc e s in Indone sia

to qua l ify

for the re gula

tory e xc e ption to the tim e lim ita

tion for m o tions to re ope n, s e e 8 C .F.R . § 1003.2(c )(3)(ii); N ajmabadi , 597 F.3d a

t 987 (ne w e vide nc e “ m

ust be ‘ qua lita

tive ly diffe re nt’ from

the e vide nc e pre s e nte d at the pre vious he aring” ). W e re je c t pe titione rs’ c onte ntion tha t the B IA’ s a

na ly sis wa s ina de quate or inc o m ple te . Se e N

a jmabadi , 597 F.3d a

t 990 (theB IA “ doe s not ha ve to write an e xe ge sis on e ve ry c o nte ntion” ). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.

1 3 - 7 0 8 0 5 2
§ 68.614 Oppositions and appeals. ( a ) Oppositions filed in response to the Administrative Council for Terminal Attachments' public notice of technical criteria proposed for publication must be received by the Administrative Council for Terminal Attachments within 30 days of public notice to be considered. Oppositions to proposed technical criteria shall be addressed through the appeals procedures of the authoring standards development organization and of the American National Standards Institute. If these procedures have been exhausted, the aggrieved party shall file its opposition with the Commission for *de novo* review.
( b ) As an alternative, oppositions to proposed technical criteria may be filed directly with the Commission for *de novo* review within the 30 day public notice period.
```

EXHIBIT 32.2

                                   iDNA, INC.
                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

I, Robert V. Cuddihy, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of iDNA, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Registrant"), in connection with the Registrant's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), do hereby
represent, warrant and certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

/s/ Robert V. Cuddihy, Jr.
-------------------------------------
Name: Robert V. Cuddihy, Jr.
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date: May 5, 2006
```
§ 68.218 Responsibility of the party acquiring equipment authorization. ( a ) In acquiring approval for terminal equipment to be connected to the public switched telephone network, the responsible party warrants that each unit of equipment marketed under such authorization will comply with all applicable rules and regulations of this part and with the applicable technical criteria of the Administrative Council for Terminal Attachments.
( b ) The responsible party or its agent shall provide the user of the approved terminal equipment the following: ( 1 ) Consumer instructions required to be included with approved terminal equipment by the Administrative Council for Terminal Attachments;
( 2 ) For a telephone that is not hearing aid-compatible, as defined in § 68.316 of these rules: ( i ) Notice that FCC rules prohibit the use of that handset in certain locations; and
( ii ) A list of such locations (see § 68.112).
( c ) When approval is revoked for any item of equipment, the responsible party must take all reasonable steps to ensure that purchasers and users of such equipment are notified to discontinue use of such equipment.
[66 FR 7585, Jan. 24, 2001]
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 158 (Wednesday, August 16, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 47248]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6955]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--VSI Alliance

    Notice is hereby given that, on July 20, 2006, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), VSI Alliance has filed written 
notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, HDL Design House, 
Belgrade, Serbia and Montenegro; Mitre Corp., Bedford, MA; chip 
Estimate Corp., Cupertino, CA; and IP Servicing Centre, Hong Kong 
Science Park, Shatin, Hong Kong-China have been added as parties to 
this venture.
    Also, Samsung Electronics Co., LTD., Yongin City, Republic of 
Korea; Beach Solutions, Reading, United Kingdom; Taiwan SoC Consortium, 
Chutung Hsinchu, Taiwan; and Artec Design Group, Tallinn, Estonia have 
withdrawn as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project remains open, and VSI Alliance 
intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes 
in membership.
    On November 29, 1996, VSI Alliance filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on March 4, 1997 (62 FR 9812).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on February 28, 
2006. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on March 23, 2006 (71 FR 14721).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 06-6955 Filed 8-15-06; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4581

To provide for the imposition of temporary fees in connection with the

handling of complaints of violations of the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 1930.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 15, 1994

Mr. DE LA GARZA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To provide for the imposition of temporary fees in connection

with the handling of complaints of violations of the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 1930.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FILING AND HANDLING FEES FOR COMPLAINTS

4 OF VIOLATIONS OF PERISHABLE AGRICUL5 TURAL COMMODITIES ACT, 1930.

6 (a) TEMPORARY FILING FEE REQUIRED.—During

7 fiscal years 1995 and 1996, the Secretary of Agriculture

8 shall require persons who submit petitions to the Secretary

9 under section 6(a) of the Perishable Agricultural Com-
2

HR 4581 IH

1 modities Act, 1930 (7 U.S.C. 499f(a)), alleging a violation

2 of section 2 of such Act (7 U.S.C. 499b), to include a

3 filing fee of $60 per petition.

4 (b) TEMPORARY HANDLING FEE REQUIRED.—Dur5 ing fiscal years 1995 and 1996, if the Secretary deter6 mines under section 6(a) of the Perishable Agricultural

7 Commodities Act, 1930 (7 U.S.C. 499f(a)), that the facts

8 contained in a petition described in such section warrant

9 further action, the person or persons submitting the peti10 tion shall submit to the Secretary a handling fee of $300.

11 The Secretary may not forward a copy of the complaint

12 to the commission merchant, dealer, or broker involved

13 until after the Secretary receives the required handling

14 fee. In determining the amount of damages incurred by

15 an injured person or persons preparatory to issuing a rep16 aration order under section 7 of such Act (7 U.S.C. 499g),

17 the Secretary shall include the amount of any handling

18 fee paid by the injured person or persons under this sub19 section.

20 (c) DEPOSIT OF FEES.—The Secretary shall deposit

21 fees submitted under this section into the Perishable Agri22 cultural Commodities Act Fund.

Æ
§ 54.1303 Calculation of the rural growth factor. ( a ) The Rural Growth Factor (RGF) is equal to the sum of the annual percentage change in the United States Department of Commerce's Gross Domestic Product—Chained Price Index (GPD-CPI) plus the percentage change in the total number of rural incumbent local exchange carrier working loops during the calendar year preceding the July 31st filing submitted pursuant to § 54.1305. The percentage change in total rural incumbent local exchange carrier working loops shall be based upon the difference between the total number of rural incumbent local exchange carrier working loops on December 31 of the calendar year preceding the July 31st filing and the total number of rural incumbent local exchange carrier working loops on December 31 of the second calendar year preceding that filing, both determined by the company's submissions pursuant to § 54.1305. Loops acquired by rural incumbent local exchange carriers shall not be included in the RGF calculation.
( b ) Beginning July 31, 2012, pursuant to § 54.1301(a), the calculation of the Rural Growth Factor shall not include price cap carrier working loops and rate-of-return local exchange carrier working loops of companies that were affiliated with price cap carriers during the calendar year preceding the July 31st filing submitted pursuant to § 54.1305.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information   extracted  from  the
consolidated  balance  sheets  and  consolidated  statements  of  income  and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS     
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 DEC-31-1998 
<CASH>                                         2,634,551
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    681,448 
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                      410,599
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       0 
<PP&E>                                        51,151,237 
<DEPRECIATION>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                54,877,835 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  0
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                    36,947,254 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  54,877,835
<SALES>                                          196,434
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              19,560,413
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 17,528,852
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 589,890
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 105,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,355,602
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,031,561
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2,031,561 
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,031,561
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       3.95
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       3.95
        


</TABLE>
#### § 68.504 Administrative Council on Terminal Attachments.

The database registration and labeling provisions of §§ 68.354, 68.610, and 68.612 shall apply to ACS telephonic CPE that is approved as hearing aid compatible and is manufactured in or imported to the United States on or after February 28, 2020. After that date, the information required by the Administrative Council on Terminal Attachments shall be submitted within 30 days after the date that the equipment is manufactured in or imported into the United States.
No. 11-9915.

#### Cruz *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Satelinx International Inc.(the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sam Grinfeld, President and Principal Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: May 20, 2005

By:/s/ Sam Grinfeld

Name:  Sam Grinfeld

Title:    President (Principal Executive Officer and Principal

Accounting Officer)
§ 400.5 Approval and award. ( a ) The ICO will review each application for compliance with the requirements of this part.
( b ) The ICO may request additional information from the applicant, with respect to any of the application submission requirements of § 400.4, prior to making a recommendation for an award. Failure to submit such additional information may preclude the applicant from further consideration for award.
( c ) The Administrator and Assistant Secretary will jointly approve and announce, in writing, grant awards to qualifying applicants.
#### State of Florida, Ex Rel. Frank Gonzales, alias “Cheeko,” *Plaintiff in*Error, vs. M. P. Lehman, Sheriff of Dade County, Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

142 So. 649.

Division A.

Opinion filed June 18, 1932.

*C. S.*Ellis, for Plaintiff in Error;

*Ca/ry D. Lcmdis,*Attorney General, and *Roy*Campbell, Assistant, for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

The ohly question presented in this case is whether or not Section 5435 R. G. S., 7578 C. G. L., is in such conflict with Section 5413 R. G. S., 7556 C. G. L., that both statutes cannot be held to be operative.

It is contended by the plaintiff in error that Section 5413 R. G. S., being a part of chapter 6225 Acts of 1911, repealed the other Section. We can find no basis for this contention. Both of these statutes were adopted as substantive law by the Legislature of the State of Florida in its adoption of the Revised General Statutes of Florida as the statutory law of this State and as both sections have a definite field of service and operatio'n, although they apply to like subjects, there is no such conflict between them as to destroy the force and effect of either.

The judgment should be affirmed and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Bueord, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.

*19Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
No. 10-10862.

#### DeBerry *v.*Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 22.325 [Reserved]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO. 1:22-cv-23753-KMM

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of 

themselves and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants.

/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Motion to Withdraw of Stuart Z. Grossman, 

Esq., and Manuel A. “Alex” Arteaga-Gomez, Esq., as co-counsel for Plaintiffs (ECF No. 212]. 

Being fully advised, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion is GRANTED. Stuart Z. Grossman, Esq., 

Manuel A. “Alex” Arteaga-Gomez, Esq., and Grossman Roth Yaffa Cohen, P.A. are permitted to 

withdraw as co-counsel for the Plaintiffs and shall have no further obligation in this matter.

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this _____ day of May, 2023.

K. MICHAEL MOORE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 212-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/30/2023 Page 1 of 1
STEAM ELECTRIC

CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: ________________________________________

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.

SE04360A151
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Aavid Thermal
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, Brian A. Byrne, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     1.  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated: March 29, 2004                             /s/ Brian A. Byrne
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Brian A. Byrne
                                                  Vice President
                                                  and Chief Financial Officer

                                       81
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6688

RAPHAEL MENDEZ,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

JAMES B. CRAVEN, III,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III,

District Judge. (5:07-hc-02173-D)

Submitted: June 30, 2008 Decided: August 6, 2008

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raphael Mendez, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Raphael Mendez, presently confined at the Federal Medical

Center in Rochester, Minnesota, appeals the district court order

dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition for lack of

jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

order and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court.

Mendez v. Craven, No. 5:07-hc-02173-D (E.D.N.C. Apr. 2, 2008). We

also find the court did not abuse its discretion in not

transferring the case. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-72243; Form S-8 No. 333-70741; Form S-8 No. 333-49417; Form
S-3 No. 333-63437; Form S-3 No. 333-47293; Form S-3/A, No. 333-29565 and Form
S-3/A, No. 333-35551) of NCS HealthCare, Inc. and in the related prospectuses of
our report dated August 18, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of NCS HealthCare, Inc. and subsidiaries included in its Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2000.


                                             /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
September 25, 2000
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4635

AN ACT

To extend the Export Administration Act of 1979.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 20 of the Export Administration Act of 1979

4 (50 U.S.C. App. 2419) is amended by striking ‘‘June 30,

5 1994’’ and inserting ‘‘August 20, 1994’’.

Passed the House of Representatives June 26, 1994.

Attest:

Clerk.
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4635

AN ACT

To extend the Export Administration Act of 1979.
No. 11-8902.

#### Mathis *v.*Scribner, Warden, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.