alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 61.14 Method of filing publications. ( a ) Publications filed electronically must be captioned to “Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554.” The Electronic Tariff Filing System will accept filings 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The official filing date of a publication received by the Electronic Tariff Filing System will be determined by the date and time the transmission ends. If the transmission ends after the close of a business day, as that term is defined in § 1.4(e)(2) of this chapter, the filing will be date and time stamped as of the opening of the next business day.
( b ) Carriers are strongly encouraged to submit publications electronically if practicable. Carriers need only transmit one set of files to the Commission. No other copies to any other party are required. Publications which must be filed in hard copy format should be submitted according to the procedures set forth on the web page of the FCC's Office of the Secretary, *https://www.fcc.gov/secretary .*
( c ) Carriers that are required to file publications electronically may not file those publications on paper or other media unless specifically required to do so by the Commission.
( d ) Carriers that are required to file publications electronically need only transmit one set of files to the Commission. No other copies to any other party are required.
( e ) Carriers that are required to file publications electronically must comply with the format requirements set forth in §§ 61.52 and 61.54, with the exception of the informational tariffs filed pursuant to 47 U.S.C. 226(h)(1)(A).
[63 FR 35540, June 30, 1998, as amended at 64 FR 46586, Aug. 26, 1999; 73 FR 9030, Feb. 19, 2008; 76 FR 43210, July 20, 2011; 83 FR 2557, Jan. 18, 2018]
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 128 (Monday, July 3, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 41065]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16877]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Sunshine Act Meeting

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: June 26, 2000, 65 
FR 39384.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF MEETING: June 28, 2000, 10:00 
a.m.

CHANGE IN THE MEETING: The following Docket Nos. and Company has been 
added to Item CAE-1 and on the Agenda scheduled for the June 28, 2000 
meeting.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Item No.                      Docket No. and company
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CAE-1.....................................  ER00-2068-000, ER00-1379-
                                             000, ER00-1386-000 and ER00-
                                             1387-000, Ameren Services
                                             Company.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-16877 Filed 6-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4596 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4596

     To designate the building located at 2200 North Highway 67 in 
  Florissant, Missouri, for the period of time during which it houses 
   operations of the United States Postal Service, as the ``John L. 
                       Lawler, Jr. Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 17, 1994

   Mr. Clay introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To designate the building located at 2200 North Highway 67 in 
  Florissant, Missouri, for the period of time during which it houses 
   operations of the United States Postal Service, as the ``John L. 
                       Lawler, Jr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The building located at 2200 North Highway 67 in Florissant, 
Missouri, shall, for the period of time during which it houses 
operations of the United States Postal Service, be known and designated 
as the ``John L. Lawler, Jr. Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall, with respect to the period referred to in section 1, be deemed 
to be a reference to the John L. Lawler, Jr. Post Office.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of ArthroCare Corporation (the
Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



1. The accompanying annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |     |  |                                                                   
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 31, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/    FERNANDO
SANCHEZ                                           
|                     |  |     |  | Fernando Sanchez Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into
any filing of the Company, whether made before of after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.786 [Reserved]
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION EIVED 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION JAN 2 1 2015 

HEARING DOCKET 

) 

In the Matter of Arctic Air Alaska, Inc. ) FDMS No. FAA2014-0316 

) FAACaseNo.2012WP910268 

____________________________ ) 

Judge Richard C. Goodwin 

WITHDRAWAL OF COMPLAINT 

The Federal Aviation Administration hereby withdraws the complaint filed in this matter on May 

22, 2014 as the parties have reached a settlement in this matter. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Peter J. Lynch 

Assistant Chief Counsel 

forEnfo 

. Autumn Killingham 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of the Chief Counsel, AGC-300 

800 Independence Ave., S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

(202) 267-7728 

(202) 267-5106 (fax) 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that the foregoing Withdrawal of Complaint, in the Arctic Air Alaska, Inc., 

FDMS No. 2014-0316, has been mailed this date by regular and Certified Mail to: 

James I. Hamilton 

President/CEO 

Arctic Air Alaska, Inc. 

3540 University Ave. South 

Fairbanks, AK 99709 

I further certify that the foregoing document has been sent via facsimile and mailed this date by 

Certified Mail to: 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E-11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

The original and a copy was also personally delivered to: 

Hearing Docket (Original and I copy) 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Room 2W1000-AGC-430 

Washington, DC 20591 

B~e~ January 21,2015
§ 64.1511 Forgiveness of charges and refunds. ( a ) Any carrier assigning a telephone number to a provider of interstate pay-per-call services or providing transmission for interstate information services provided pursuant to a presubscription or comparable arrangement or on a collect basis, and providing billing and collection for such services, shall establish procedures for the handling of subscriber complaints regarding charges for those services. A billing carrier is afforded discretion to set standards for determining when a subscriber's complaint warrants forgiveness, refund or credit of interstate pay-per-call or information services charges provided that such charges must be forgiven, refunded, or credited when a subscriber has complained about such charges and either this Commission, the Federal Trade Commission, or a court of competent jurisdiction has found or the carrier has determined, upon investigation, that the service has been offered in violation of federal law or the regulations that are either set forth in this subpart or prescribed by the Federal Trade Commission pursuant to titles II or III of the TDDRA. Carriers shall observe the record retention requirements set forth in § 42.6 of this chapter except that relevant records shall be retained by carriers beyond the requirements of part 42 of this chapter when a complaint is pending at the time the specified retention period expires.
( b ) Any carrier assigning a telephone number to a provider of interstate pay-per-call services but not providing billing and collection services for such services, shall, by tariff or contract, require that the provider and/or its billing and collection agents have in place procedures whereby, upon complaint, pay-per-call charges may be forgiven, refunded, or credited, provided that such charges must be forgiven, refunded, or credited when a subscriber has complained about such charges and either this Commission, the Federal Trade Commission, or a court of competent jurisdiction has found or the carrier has determined, upon investigation, that the service has been offered in violation of federal law or the regulations that are either set forth in this subpart or prescribed by the Federal Trade Commission pursuant to titles II or III of the TDDRA.
[58 FR 44773, Aug. 25, 1993, as amended at 59 FR 46771, Sept. 12, 1994]
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**








CERTIFICATION
      OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I,
        Angela
        Du, Chief Executive Officer of China Mobility Solutions, Inc., certify
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as enacted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
        the
        Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March
        31,
        2006 (the "Periodic Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies
        with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of China Mobility
        Solutions, Inc.













Dated: May
              15,
              2006
            /s/
              Xiao-qing DuXiao-qing
                Du,
              Chief
                Executive Officer













A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to China Mobility Solutions, Inc. and will
      be
      retained by China Mobility Solutions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 302-9.140 Under what specific conditions may my agency authorize transportation of a POV to my post of duty upon my assignment to that post of duty? Your agency may authorize transportation of a POV to your post of duty when: ( a ) It has determined in accordance with § 302-9.604 that it is in the interest of the Government for you to have use of your POV at the post of duty;
( b ) You have signed a service agreement; and
( c ) You meet any specific conditions your agency has established.
[FTR Amdt. 98, 66 FR 58196, Nov. 20, 2001, as amended by FTR Amdt. 2011-01, 76 FR 18342, Apr. 1, 2011; FTR Amdt. 2011-06, 76 FR 71890, Nov. 21, 2011]
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 25 May 2005         

establishing the classes of external fire performance of roofs and roof coverings for certain construction products as provided for by Council Directive 89/106/EEC

(notified under document number C(2005) 1501)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2005/403/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 89/106/EEC of 21 December 1988 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to construction products (1), and in particular Article 20(2) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The construction products and/or materials which satisfy all the requirements of the performance characteristic ‘external fire performance’ without need for further testing are set out in the Annex.

Article 2

The specific classes to be applied to different construction products and/or materials, within the external fire performance classification adopted in Decision 2001/671/EC, are set out in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 May 2005.

For the Commission

Günter VERHEUGEN            

Vice-President

----

(1)OJ L 40, 11.2.1989, p. 12. Directive as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1882/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 284, 31.10.2003, p. 1).

(2)OJ C 62, 28.2.1994, p. 1.

(3)OJ L 235, 4.9.2001, p. 20.

----

ANNEX

The table set out in this Annex lists construction products and/or materials which satisfy all the requirements for the performance characteristic external fire performance without need for testing.

Table

Classes of external fire performance for plastisol coated steel roof sheets

----

(1)  External fire performance class as provided for in the table of the Annex to Decision 2001/671/EC.

----
§ 25.261 Sharing among NGSO FSS space stations. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 88 FR 39792 , June 20, 2023.
( a ) *Scope.* This section applies to NGSO FSS operation with earth stations with directional antennas anywhere in the world under a Commission license, or in the United States under a grant of U.S. market access.
( b ) *Coordination.* NGSO FSS licensees and market access recipients must coordinate in good faith the use of commonly authorized frequencies regardless of their processing round status.
( c ) *Default procedure.* Absent coordination between two or more satellite systems, whenever the increase in system noise temperature of an earth station receiver, or a space station receiver for a satellite with on-board processing, of either system, ΔT/T, exceeds 6 percent due to interference from emissions originating in the other system in a commonly authorized frequency band, such frequency band will be divided among the affected satellite networks in accordance with the following procedure: ( 1 ) Each of n (number of) satellite networks involved that were licensed or granted market access through the same processing round, except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section, must select 1/n of the assigned spectrum available in each of these frequency bands. The selection order for each satellite network will be determined by the date that the first space station in each satellite system is launched and capable of operating in the frequency band under consideration;
( 2 ) The affected station(s) of the respective satellite systems may operate in only the selected (1/n) spectrum associated with its satellite system while the ΔT/T of 6 percent threshold is exceeded;
( 3 ) All affected station(s) may resume operations throughout the assigned frequency bands once the threshold is no longer exceeded.
( d ) [Reserved]
( e ) *Sunsetting.* Ten years after the first authorization or grant of market access in a processing round, the systems approved in that processing round will no longer be required to protect earlier-rounds systems, and instead will be required to share spectrum with earlier-round systems under paragraph (c) of this section.
[82 FR 59986, Dec. 18, 2017, as amended at 88 FR 39792, June 20, 2023]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5




<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000

<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000

<CASH>                                         4,949,431
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  370,009
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    30,343
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,423,151
<PP&E>                                         575,269
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5,999,332
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          454,409
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       21,360
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,478,533
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5,999,332
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               729,339
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  149,504
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,044,422
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (48,090)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (416,547)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (416,547)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (416,547)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.02)



</TABLE>
DistTransformerTP-SN To: OPR cc: Subject: Public Meeting for Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for 07/30/2004 01:34 PM Test Procedures for Distribution Transformers, September 27, 2004

To Distribution Transformer Stakeholders: The Department of Energy (the Department) is writing to inform you that a Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (SNOPR) for Test Procedures for Distribution Transformers was published in the Federal Register (69 FR 45506, July 29, 2004) and is now available for your review at the following website: http://www.eere. energy.gov/buildings/appliance-standards/commercial/distribution_transformers_snopr. html The Department invites you and any other interested stakeholders to participate in a public meeting for presentation of comments on the SNOPR on September 27, 2004, at the Department of Energy's Forrestal Building in Washington DC, Room 1E-245 from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. EDT. If you would like to participate in the public meeting, please inform Brenda Edwards-Jones at email: Brenda.Edwards-Jones@ee.doe.gov or telephone: (202) 586 2945. Foreign nationals wishing to attend the meeting must contact Brenda no later than August 27th. If you would like to make a statement at the public meeting, please inform her and provide her with a copy of your statement by September 13th. The deadline for submitting written comments on the SNOPR is November 8th. You may submit comments electronically, by mail, or by courier. Wherever possible, comments in the electronic format should carry the electronic signature of the author. Absent an electronic signature, comments submitted electronically must be followed and authenticated by submitting a signed original paper document. All comments (electronic and paper) should clearly identify the Docket Number (EE-TP-98-550) and/or RIN 1904-AA85. E-mail: DistTransformersTP-SNOPR@ee.doe.gov Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards-Jones, U.S. Department of Energy, Building Technologies Program, Mailstop EE-2J, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC, 20585-0121. Courier: Ms. Brenda Edwards-Jones, U.S. Department of Energy, Building Technologies Program, Mailstop EE-2J, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC, 20585-0121. Telephone: 202-586-2945 -We appreciate your reviewing the SNOPR and look forward to your participation in the public meeting and your comments on the SNOPR. Cyrus Nasseri Building Technologies Program, EE-2J Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy U.S. Department of Energy 202-586-9138
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 7, 2011

s0131 

# Order

February 7, 2011

141835

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141835 COA: 298422 Kent CC: 09-003677-FC; 09-003947-FC GEORGE EDWIN BROWN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the A ugust 9, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
No. 11-10016.

#### Riojas, aka Riojas-Sandoval *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.