alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 54.422 Annual reporting for eligible telecommunications carriers that receive low-income support. ( a ) In order to receive support under this subpart, an eligible telecommunications carrier must annually report: ( 1 ) The company name, names of the company's holding company, operating companies and affiliates, and any branding (a “dba,” or “doing-business-as company” or brand designation) as well as relevant universal service identifiers for each such entity by Study Area Code. For purposes of this paragraph, “affiliates” has the meaning set forth in section 3(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended; and
( 2 ) Information describing the terms and conditions of any voice telephony service plans offered to Lifeline subscribers, including details on the number of minutes provided as part of the plan, additional charges, if any, for toll calls, and rates for each such plan. To the extent the eligible telecommunications carrier offers plans to Lifeline subscribers that are generally available to the public, it may provide summary information regarding such plans, such as a link to a public Web site outlining the terms and conditions of such plans.
( b ) In order to receive support under this subpart, a common carrier that is designated as an eligible telecommunications carrier under section 214(e)(6) of the Act and does not receive support under subpart D of this part must annually provide: ( 1 ) Detailed information on any outage in the prior calendar year, as that term is defined in 47 CFR 4.5, of at least 30 minutes in duration for each service area in which the eligible telecommunications carrier is designated for any facilities it owns, operates, leases, or otherwise utilizes that potentially affect ( i ) At least ten percent of the end users served in a designated service area; or
( ii ) A 911 special facility, as defined in 47 CFR 4.5(e).
( iii ) Specifically, the eligible telecommunications carrier's annual report must include information detailing: ( A ) The date and time of onset of the outage;
( B ) A brief description of the outage and its resolution;
( C ) The particular services affected;
( D ) The geographic areas affected by the outage;
( E ) Steps taken to prevent a similar situation in the future; and
( F ) The number of customers affected.
( 2 ) The number of complaints per 1,000 connections (fixed or mobile) in the prior calendar year;
( 3 ) Certification of compliance with applicable minimum service standards, as set forth in § 54.408, service quality standards, and consumer protection rules;
( 4 ) Certification that the carrier is able to function in emergency situations as set forth in § 54.202(a)(2).
( c ) All reports required by this section must be filed with the Office of the Secretary of the Commission, and with the Administrator. Such reports must also be filed with the relevant state commissions and the relevant authority in a U.S. territory or Tribal governments, as appropriate.
[77 FR 38534, June 28, 2012, as amended at 81 FR 33095, May 24, 2016]
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LOUIS JACK STALEY,

Appellant,

v.

BONNIE STALEY,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-3211

[April 1, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Dale C. Cohen, Judge; L.T. Case No. FMCE160005272 

(37) (98).

Angelena M. Conant of Angelena M. Root, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for 

appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., MAY and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Y3K Secure  Enterprises  Software,
Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"),on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending
September 30, 2003 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  (the
"Report"), I, King Cole, President and CEO of the Company,  certify, pursuant to
ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350),  that to my
knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ King Cole
-----------------
King Cole
President and CEO
May 11, 2004


                                       50
#### § 64.1700 Purpose and scope.

The purpose of this subpart is to implement the Telecommunications Act of 1996 which amended the Communications Act by creating section 273(d)(5), 47 U.S.C. 273(d)(5). Section 273(d) sets forth procedures to be followed by non-accredited standards development organizations when these organizations set industry-wide standards and generic requirements for telecommunications equipment or customer premises equipment. The statutory procedures allow outside parties to fund and participate in setting the organization's standards and require the organization and the parties to develop a process for resolving any technical disputes. In cases where all parties cannot agree to a mutually satisfactory dispute resolution process, section 273(d)(5) requires the Commission to prescribe a dispute resolution process.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with this Quarterly Report of HIV-VAC Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the year period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin Murray, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the
         period ending June 30, 2009, fairly presents, in all material
         respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HIV-VAC
         Inc.

Date: September 30, 2011

/s/ Kevin Murray
Kevin Murray
Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                           5,260
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   66,444
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,370
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                69,047
<PP&E>                                          24,541
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,951
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  94,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,791
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           118
<OTHER-SE>                                    (74,776)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    94,100
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,660
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,138
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   812
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,306
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,642)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        25
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,667)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,667)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.40)


</TABLE>
----

|                                                 |                                          |
|------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
| SUBSIDIARIES                                         | JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION |
|                                                 |                                          |
| AR Management Services, Inc.                         | DE                                            |
|                                                 |                                          |
| Celadon E-Commerce, Inc.                             | DE                                            |
|                                                 |                                          |
| Celadon Mexicana, S.A. de C.V.                       | Mexico                                        |
|                                                 |                                          |
| Celadon Trucking Service, Inc.                       | NJ                                            |
|                                                 |                                          |
| Celadon Logistics Services, Inc.                     | DE                                            |
|                                                 |                                          |
| Celadon Trucking Services of Indiana, Inc.           | IN                                            |
|                                                 |                                          |
| Celadon Canada, Inc.                                 | Ontario, Canada                               |
|                                                 |                                          |
| Quality Equipment Leasing, LLC                       | DE                                            |
|                                                 |                                          |
| Celadon International Corp.                          | DE                                            |
|                                                 |                                          |
| Servicios Corporativos Jaguar, S.A de C.V.           | Mexico                                        |
|                                                 |                                          |
| Servicios de Transportacion Jaguar, S.A de C.V.      | Mexico                                        |
|                                                 |                                          |
| Truckers Legal Protection, Inc.                      | IN                                            |
|                                                 |                                          |
| Truckers Insurance and Health Benefit Solutions, LLC | AZ                                            |
|                                                 |                                          |
| Zipp Realty LLC                                      | IN                                            |

Back to Form 10-K
```

[Federal Register: January 11, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 6)]
[Notices]               
[Page 1447]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr11ja10-107]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

 
Receipt of Noise Compatibility Program Update and Request for 
Review for Modesto City-County Airport, Modesto, CA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice, correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) published a notice 
in the Federal Register on December 18, 2009. (74 FR 67305). This 
action corrects an error in a date in that document. The notice 
announced that the FAA is reviewing a proposed noise compatibility 
program update that was submitted for Modesto City-County Airport under 
the provisions of 49 U.S.C. 47501 et seq. (the Aviation Safety and 
Noise Abatement Act) and 14 CFR Part 150 by City of Modesto.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Camille Garibaldi, Telephone number: 
(650) 876-2778, extension 613.

Correction

    In Notice document (Federal Register Doc. E9-30186) published on 
December 18, 2009 (74 FR 67305) make the following correction:
    On page 67305 in the second column, in the fourth line of the third 
paragraph under the heading SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION; the date 
December 6, 2009, is corrected to read, December 9, 2009.

    Issued in Hawthorne, California on December 29, 2009.
Mark A. McClardy,
Manager, Airports Division, AWP-600, Western-Pacific Region.
[FR Doc. 2010-114 Filed 1-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
```
No. 11-8867.

#### Cromer *v.*Braman et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 16-2497

___________________________

Charles A. LaLiberte

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Director of Bureau of Prisons; Christopher Nickrenz

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________

 Submitted: November 29, 2016

Filed: December 2, 2016

[Unpublished]

____________

Before SHEPHERD, ARNOLD, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Charles LaLiberte appeals after the district court dismissed his pro se 1

complaint. Upon careful review, we find no reason to reverse the dismissal order

The Honorable Stephen R. Bough, United States District Judge for the

1

Western District of Missouri.
because, among other reasons, we agree with the district court that it had no personal

jurisdiction over defendants. See World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, 444

U.S. 286, 291-92 (1980) (nonresident defendant must have minimum contacts such

that suit “does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice”);

Miller v. Nippon Carbon Co., 528 F.3d 1087, 1090-91 (8th Cir. 2008) (de novo

review). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R.

47B.

______________________________

-2-
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NetFabric Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Vasan Thatham, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

November 20, 2006


                                        /s/ Vasan Thatham
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name: Vasan Thatham
                                        Title: Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to NetFabric Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by NetFabric Holdings,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-2121

SUSAN SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus CITY OF MARION; BOBBY GERALD, individually and as Mayor; BOBBY DAVIS, individually and in his official capacity as a member of the City Council of Marion; JERRY MITCHELLE, individually and in his official capacity as a member of the City Council of Marion; MICHAEL BAKER, individually and in his official capacity as a member of the City Council of Marion; FRANK M. HART, individually and in his official capacity as a member of the City Council of Marion; RALPH ATKINSON, individually and in his official capacity as a member of the City Council of Marion; FRAIZER WALPOH, individually and in his official capacity as City of Marion Administrator; CLYDE JAMES, individually; JAMES EQUIPMENT WRECKER SERVICE; JOHN FINNEY, individually and in his capacity; RONALD ATKINSON, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (CA-04-1327-4-TLW)
Submitted: June 15, 2006 De cided: June 19, 2006- 2 - Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Susan Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Charles Baxter, RICHARDSON, PLOWDEN, CARPENTER & ROBINSON, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina; Saunders McKenzie Bridges, Jr., AIKEN, BRIDGES, NUNN, ELLIOTT & TYLER, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* In the district court, the lead plaintiff was Derrick Smith; he is no longer a party on appeal. - 3 - PER CURIAM: Susan Smith * appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. On appeal, Smith alleges that the district court improperly referred the action to the magistrate judge without the consent of the parties. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. The district court properly referred Defendants’ motion for summary judgment to the magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000), and Smith filed objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. See Orpiano v. Johnson , 687 F.2d 44, 46 (4th Cir. 1982) (noting that a district court may refer matters to a magistrate judge without the consent of the parties under § 636(b)). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
## AIRCRAFT, MAINTENANCE AND MISSION LOGS

All logs are to be recorde d electronically on the Aerial World View profile of the **dji** Application Note: All fields must be completed

AERIAL WORLD VIEW 0900006481bac99d Mission Logs must be completed within 1 .5 hours of completion of mission

- All fields must be completed, and complete details must be provided around the following areas: o Aircraft Configuration o Aircraft changes since last flight o Pa yload o WP description o Missio n Objectives o Flight data o Post flight analysis o Additional notes Maintenance Logs must be completed within 1.5 hours of completion of each scheduled/planned ma intenance activity

.
April 21, 2015

Mr. Thaddeus Sargent

Team AeroDynamix

2735 Grey Rd.

Davidson, NC 28036

Dear Mr. Sargent:

This is in response to your August 5, 2015, letter sent to the public docket No. FAA-2014-

0597 petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration on behalf of Team AeroDynamix for an 

exemption from § 91.319(a)(2) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That 

exemption, if granted, would allow Team AeroDynamix to operate within a 25 mile radius of 

an air show venue for the purpose of conducting media/sponsor flights to promote the air 

show industry, aviation, and the air show event specifically without compensation.

You do not require an exemption from 14 CFR § 91.319(a)(2) since the regulation in 

pertinent part only prohibits those operations conducted carrying persons or property for 

compensation or hire. Your exemption request specifically refers to operations conducted 

without compensation for the carriage of persons identified in your petition.

Because the relief you seek is not required, we will take no further action on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/

John Barbagallo

Acting Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            College of Information and Cyberspace
                    National Defense University
                CIC
        Search
                    Search CIC:
                        Search
                Search CIC:
                    Search
    Home

    About 
        Mission & Vision

    Faculty & Staff

    Fact Sheet

    Alumni

    Internships

    FAQ

    Admissions 
        Eligibility Requirements

    Admissions Calendar

    Application Instructions

    Apply Online

    International Students

    Academics 
        Graduate Catalog

    M.S. in Strategic Information and Cyberspace Studies
        
        JPME Master's Degree

    Cyber Workforce Master's Degree (Part Time)

    Leadership Development Programs

    Graduate Certificates

    Academic Partners

    Current Students 
        JPME II  Incoming Students

    LDP Incoming Students

    Student Registration

    Bring Your Own Device

    IA Compliance

    Completion Procedures / Order Transcripts

    Student Services and Resources

    Events
    
        Cyber Beacon

    Cyber PME Colloquium

    Hopper Award

    Lecture Series

    CYBERCOM Symposium

    NEWS

    UC2
    
        About

    Events

    Work With Us

    Center for Cybersecurity
    
        About

    Cybersecurity Center POC

    Cybersecurity Supporting Faculty

    CAE-CDE CISO Certificate Program

    Cybersecurity Trending News

    Cyber Labs
        
        Ethical Hacking

    Critical Infrastructure - SCADA

    Cyber Exercises
        
        Tabletop Exercise

    Cyber Competitions

    Cyber Resources and Awareness

    Stakeholder / Industry Advisory Council

    Contact 
        Contact Us

    Directions

    Access to Ft. McNair

    Map of Ft. McNair  Home
  NEWS
  News & Announcements
 News & Announcements News
 University of  Missouri & Columbia
 Paper Info
 SHARE
 PRINT
 National Defense University


College of Information and Cyberspace

300 Fifth Ave., Bldg. 62
Fort Lesley J. McNair
Washington, DC 20319-5066

202-685-6300
                    Stay Connected
                
                
                DOD Privacy & Security
 DOD Links Disclaimer
 DOD Social Media Policy
 DOD Web Policy
 FOIA
 NDU System of Records Notice
 NDU Privacy & Security Notice
 No FEAR Act
 Open GOV
 Plain Writing Act
 Section 508
 Small Business Act
 USA.gov
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### § 54.318 [Reserved]