alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Greg Coulter [mailto:greg.coulter405@gmail.com]

Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 5:27 PM

To: Christopher Bolduc

Cc: Richard Parker; rick.anderson@faypwc.com; tballo@earthjustice.org; ScottB@lvmetals.com;

john.caskey@nema.org; jerry.corkran@cooperindustries.com; john.cymbalsky@ee.doe.gov;

adelaski@standardsasap.org; Teckman@nwcouncil.org; gbf1@pge.com; carlos.gaytan@ge.com;

rgreeson@federalpacific.com; bruce.r.hirsch@bge.com; jhodge@howard.com; mhyland@appanet.org;

dave.millure@metglas.com; snadel@aceee.org; wes.patterson@us.abb.com;

Eric.Petersen@aksteel.com; Raymond.Polinski@atimetals.com; artrosenfeld@gmail.com;

srosenstock@eei.org; rroy@nrdc.org; robert.saint@nreca.coop; chuck.simmons@pgnmail.com;

BermanEconomics@gmail.com; Daniel.Cohen@hq.doe.gov; Jim.creevy@nema.org;

ahofmann@publicpower.org; pkumar@publicpower.org; jmauer@standardsasap.org;

Aaron.Meyers@cooperindustries.com; jrossetti@mlgw.org; Paul.Ryan@hitmet.com;

jerry.schoen@aksteel.com; bsmi th@federalpacific.com; mwaltner@nrdc.org; kwinder@mleainc.com;

Brian Coffey; kcoughlin@lbl.gov; brenda.edwards@ee.doe.gov; jeremiah.freeman@ee.doe.gov; Caitlin

Johnson; Zhimei Luo; emily.marchetti@ee.doe.gov; Michael Rivest; gjrosenquist@lbl.gov;

charlied@uus.org; phopkinson@hvolt.com; James.Lass@cleco.com; maheshsampat@bellsouth.net;

DYoung@energy

‐ solution.com; chad.kennedy@us.schneider

‐ electric.com; eduardorobles@eaton.com;

vijay.tendulkar@onyxpower.com; thomas.patzner@us.schneider

‐ electric.com;

carlosgsiqueiros@eaton.com; Raba, Jim

Subject: Re: MV Liquid

‐ immersed LCC and NIA Results Update

Chris,

We have some comments on the document you sent. Please see our attached docume nt.

Thanks

Greg

On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Christopher Bolduc < cabolduc@lbl.gov > wrote:

All,

It has been pointed out to me, that some of the labels in the document

were incorrect and may have caused unnecessary confusion. Also, there

was an error in how TSL 4 (domestically available material) was

defined for designs lines 1 and 4; this only impacts the results

presente d on pages 18 and 19.

These oversights have been addressed in the attached file.

Thank you,

‐ Chris BolducOn Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Christopher Bolduc < cabolduc@lbl.gov > wrote:

> Dear Committee Members,

>

> Please find the draft LCC and NIA results for liquid

‐ immersed

> medium

‐ voltage transformers (design lines 1

‐ 5) attached.

>

> A summary of changes and additional sensitivities will be distributed

> before next week's meeting.

>

> Thank you,

> ‐‐ Chris Bolduc

>

> ‐‐‐‐

> Chris Bolduc

> Energy Efficiency Standards Group

> Environmental Energy Technologies Division

> Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

> t. 416

‐ 535

‐ 7546

> c. 647

‐ 832

‐ 4021

>

‐‐

‐‐‐‐

Chris Bolduc

Energy Efficiency Standards Group

Environmental Energy Technologies Division

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

t. 416

‐ 535

‐ 7546

c. 647

‐ 832

‐ 4021

‐‐

Greg Coulter
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, CA07-002, 008, 009, Application of Emerging Technologies for Cancer Research (STTR R41/R42), (SBIR R43/44), (R21/R33, R21, R33).                    

*Date:*                         October 18-19, 2006.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Marriott Bethesda Suites, 6711 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20817.                    

*Contact Person:*                         C. Michael Kerwin, PhD, MPH, Scientific Review Administrator, Special Review and Logistics Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 6116 Executive Blvd., Rm. 8057, Bethesda, MD 20892-8329. 301-496-7421.                         *kerwinm@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS).

Dated: August 17, 2006.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 06-7167 Filed 8-25-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
- 1 - 

Alexander Van der Bellen 

Managing Director and 

Associate General Counsel 

Delta Air Lines, Inc. 

1212 New York Avenue NW 

Washington, DC 20005 

202.842.4184 

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com 

December 19, 2011 

Mr. Dennis DeVany 

Chief, EAS & Domestic Analysis Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Service at Greenbrier/White Sulphur Springs, WV 

Docket DOT-OST-2003-15553 

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

Delta provides service at Greenbrier/White Sulphur Springs, WV (“Greenbrier”) through its Delta 

Connection partners ASA and Pinnacle. Delta’s Greenbrier service is currently provided without 

government subsidy. 

On December 16, 2011, Pinnacle and ASA filed 90 day termination notices for their services at 

Greenbrier. ASA currently flies daily nonstop from Atlanta; Pinnacle flies daily nonstop from 

New York (JFK). These services are incurring heavy losses. Booked load factors for January 

are 24% on the Atlanta service and 6% on the JFK service. 

To mitigate losses and reduce subsidy requirements, Delta is making service adjustments 

effective February 15, 2012. Delta will offer 10 weekly flights between Atlanta and Greenbrier 

on a one-stop basis via Roanoke, VA. Greenbrier also receives two nonstop weekly flights to 

Cleveland, for a total of 12 weekly flights. This service level meets Greenbrier’s EAS guarantee 

of 12 one-stop flights. 

Delta understands that the Department has no objection to the substitution of additional ASA 

flights for Pinnacle flights provided that Delta causes the additional ASA services to be 

performed. Delta affirms that commitment. 

Sincerely, 

Alexander Van der Bellen 

Managing Director, Government Affairs 

 and Associate General Counsel 

cc: Service List 
 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 A copy of the foregoing has been served this 19th day of December, 2011, upon the following 

persons 

via Federal Express: 

The Honorable John Manchester 

Mayor 

City of Lewisburg 

942 Washington Street, West 

Lewisburg, WV 24901 

The Honorable Lloyd Haynes 

Mayor 

City Of White Sulphur Springs 

34 W. Main St. 

White Sulphur Springs, WV 24986 

 

via email: 

Susan V. Chernenko 

Director 

West Virginia Aeronautics Commission 

West Virginia Department of 

Transportation 

susan.v.chernenko@wv.gov 

Jon Lindlief 

Director – Planning and Development 

Atlantic Southeast Airlines 

jon.lindlief@flyasa.com 

Phil Reed 

Vice-President, Network Scheduling, 

Operational Analytics & Engineering 

Pinnacle Airlines Corp. 

preed@pncl.com 

Mickey Bowman 

Vice President of Essential Air Service 

Silver Airways 

mbowman@gulfstreamair.com 

 

 

via email and Federal Express: 

Jerry O’Sullivan 

Airport Manager 

Greenbrier Valley Airport 

558 Airport Road 

Lewisburg, WV 24901 

jerryosull@aol.com
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 166 (Monday, August 28, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 50931]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7173]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Library of Medicine; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Biomedical Library and Informatics Review 
Committee.
    Date: November 8-9, 2006.
    Time: November 8, 2006, 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Library of Medicine, Building 38, 2nd Floor, 
Board Room, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Time: November 9, 2006, 8 a.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Library of Medicine, Building 38, 2nd Floor, 
Board Room, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Arthur A Petrosian, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Extramural Programs, National Library of 
Medicine, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 301, Bethesda, MD 20892-7968. 
301-496-4253. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5b2b3e2f293428323a1b363a323775353233753c342d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c6b6a3b2b4a9b5afa786aba7afaae8a8afaee8a1a9b0">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.879, 
Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 21, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-7173 Filed 8-25-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

EX-10.04
     2

                JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT AMENDMENT AMONG JWH & FUND


                       JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT AMENDMENT

     This Joint Venture Agreement Amendment dated as of January 31, 2001, by
and among ML JWH STRATEGIC ALLOCATION FUND L.P. (the "Partnership") and JOHN
W. HENRY & COMPANY INC. ("JWH").

                                   WITNESSETH

     WHEREAS, the parties hereto entered an Joint Venture Agreement dated as
of April 25, 1996 pursuant to which JWH is acting as a commodity trading
advisor for the Partnership (as amended to the date hereof, the "Joint
Venture Agreement," certain defined terms are used herein as defined
therein); and

     WHEREAS, the parties hereto wish to amend the Joint Venture Agreement in
order to provide for the termination of the exclusivity provisions contained
therein.

     NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants
contained in the Joint Venture Agreement and herein, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree to
amend the Joint Venture Agreement as follows:

     1. Exclusivity. The exclusivity arrangement contained in Section 31 of
the Joint Venture Agreement shall terminate on February 28, 2001.

     2. Entire Agreement. This Amendment, together with the Joint Venture
Agreement and all amendments thereto, constitutes the entire agreement among
the parties hereto with respect to the matters referred to herein, and no
other agreement, verbal or otherwise, shall be binding as between the parties
unless it shall be in writing and signed by the party against whom
enforcement is sought.

     3. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in one or more
counterparts, each of which shall, however, together constitute one and
the same document.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have hereto duly set forth their
hand as of the 31st day of January, 2001.


                                       ML JWH STRATEGIC ALLOCATION FUND L.P.

                                       By: MERRILL LYNCH INVESTMENT
                                           PARTNERS INC., its general
                                           partner

                                       By: /s/ Steven B. Olgin
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Name: Steven B. Olgin
                                          Title: VP and Secretary


                                           JOHN W. HENRY & COMPANY INC.

                                       By: /s/ David M. Kozak
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Name: David M. Kozak
                                          Title: Sr. VP

<PAGE>

Confirmed:
not as a Joint Venturer but
solely for the limited purposes
set forth herein

MERRILL LYNCH FUTURES INC.

By: /s/ Fabio Savoldelli
   -------------------------------
   Name: Fabio Savoldelli
   Title: President and Director
270P15

#### State v. Terence D. Smith

Def’s *Pro Se*Motion for PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COAP15-441)

Dismissed
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-19-0000553 27-FEB-2020 09:08 AM
§ 80.37 One authorization for a plurality of stations. *Marine utility stations.* One station license may be issued to authorize a designated maximum number of marine utility stations operating at temporary unspecified locations, normally in multiples of ten stations when: ( a ) The licensee of each station is the same; and
( b ) The authorized area of operation of each station is the same.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463 as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                     Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research (DMR) #1203.                

*Dates & Times:*                     February 9, 2006; 7:15 a.m.-9 p.m. (open 8:45-12:15; 1:30-4:45; 6:15-7), (closed: 4:45-6:15; 7-9).                 

February 10, 2006; 7:30 a.m.-4 p.m. (open: 8:45-11:15).

*Place:*                     University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.                

*Type of Meeting:*                     Part open.                

*Contact Person:*                     Dr. Maija M. Kukla, Program Director, Materials Research Science and Engineering Centers, Division of Materials Research, Room 1065, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone (703) 292-4940.                

*Purpose of Meeting:*                     To provide advice and recommendations concerning progress of Materials Research Science and Engineering Center.                

*Agenda:*                     February 9, 2006—Open for Directors overview of Materials Research Science and Engineering Center and presentations. Closed to brief site visit panel.                

February 10, 2006—Open for view and presentations. Closed to review and evaluate progress of Materials Research Science and Engineering Center.

*Reason for Closing:*                     The work being reviewed may include information on a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                

Dated: January 20, 2006.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 06-702 Filed 1-24-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
# Dr. Andrew Whiskeyman

### Associate Professor

### 

### 

**Areas of Interest:**

Information Warfare, Strategic Foresight, Emerging and Disruptive Technology.

Dr. Andrew Whiskeyman is an Associate Professor at the National Defense University’s College of Information and Cyberspace. His areas of expertise are Information Warfare; Strategic Foresight; and emerging and disruptive technology. His areas of research include the use of the theory and practice of information in warfare, coalition warfare, and Multi-domain campaigning.

Prior to this role, he served for seven years within U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) Macdill AFB, Florida. His final assignment was Chief of the Information Operations Division (J39). Before that, he worked in the Joint Cyber Center (JCC) in a variety of roles; culminating as the Chief of Cyber Strategy for the command. His eclectic career commenced with an assignment to Misawa AB, Japan as an enlisted military intelligence Soldier. He re-enlisted, and was then selected for officer candidate school (OCS); commissioning into the basic branch of Air Defense Artillery. In 2007, he transitioned to the Information Operations functional area (FA30). 

He has deployed five times: Kosovo (KFOR 3B - 2001/02), Afghanistan (3 times - 2004, 2006/07, and 2012/13), and Iraq (2008/09). He also has myriad shorter trips into the Middle East theater of operations. 

He is a graduate (and plank owner) of the Marine Corps Expeditionary Warfare School (EWS - 2004), Air Command and Staff College (ACSC 2011 in residence – Master’s in Military Operational Art and Science (MOAS)), and the School of Advanced Air and Space Studies (SAASS XXI – 2012 – Master’s of Philosophy in Military Strategy). He was the first Soldier in the Advanced Strategic Planning and Policy Program (ASP3) to earn his PhD (Military Strategy, Air University 2015). He also holds a Bachelor of Arts in English from the University of Connecticut. 

His military awards include the Defense Superior Service Medal, the Bronze Star, and the Defense Meritorious Service Medal. He and his wife have been married for over 28 years, and they have four children, four dogs, and a turtle.
#### § 80.703 Priority of distress and other signals.

Alaska-public fixed stations, when operating on an authorized carrier frequency which is also used by the maritime mobile service, must give priority to distress, urgency or safety signals, or to any communication preceded by one of these signals.
§ 80.707 Cooperative use of frequency assignments. ( a ) Only one Alaska-public fixed station will be authorized to serve any area whose point-to-point communication needs can be adequately served by a single radio communication facility.
( b ) Each radio channel authorized for use by an Alaska-private fixed station is available on a shared basis only. All station licensees must cooperate in the use of their respective frequency assignments to minimize interference.
#### NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. AUGUSTA CHEMICAL CO.

No. 13359.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 13, 1951.

Fannie M. Boyls, Attorney, N.L.R.B., David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Cnsl., N. L.R.B. and A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Cnsl., N.L.R.B., all of Washingston, D. C., for petitioner.

W. M. Fulcher, Augusta, Ga., for respondent.

Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and McCORD and BORAH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In this case the labor union involved in the controversy at the plant had not complied with Sec. 9(f), (g), and (h) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. § 159(f-h), and charges filed by it were dismissed. Thereupon, with the assistance of the same union, charges were prepared and filed in the names of the individual employees claiming to have been discriminated against, and, over Respondent’s objection, the complaint, based on these charges, was prosecuted to a favorable conclusion, and the order, sought to be enforced here, was entered.

*64Respondent opposes enforcement on two grounds. One of these is that the charges, though filed in the names of the individual employees, were in fact filed by the union, and that, as filed, they are mere subterfuges, indeed frauds, upon the law. The other is that the Board findings, that the complained of action was discriminatory and in violation of law, are not supported by substantial evidence when the record is viewed as a whole. We cannot agree.

Whatever may have been, or may be, the real purpose of the Statutes under-which these proceedings are maintained, its avowed purpose was not to favor or promote unions as such. It was to promote and protect the rights of individual employees to join or not to join unions and to be free from coercion and interference either way.

Because in practice the unions, as such, have dominated, and are dominating, the scene on which these dramas unfold, it may not be said that individual employees have no right to act individually in asserting and vindicating their rights. To do so is to put the cart before the horse, to sublimate the agent above the principal, to make the tail wag the dog.

We are in complete disagreement with Respondent’s position on this point. Granted that the disqualified union was active in assisting, indeed in directing, the em-ployées in preparing their charges, it does not at all follow that the employees, by accepting that assistance, disqualified themselves. The saying, that a man cannot touch pitch and not be defiled, may not be thus applied.

The second point, that the evidence is insufficient to support the Board’s findings, is no better taken. In our opinion the record .fully sustains them. Indeed, we think the report of the trial examiner exhibits throughout not only a thorough understanding and appreciation of the effect of the evidence but a most commendable judicial approach to, and handling of, the issues presented. We are in no doubt that the petition for enforcement should be granted as prayed. Petition

Granted.