alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 51-11.6 Filing requirements for demands for documents or testimony. Compliance with the following requirements is required when issuing demands or requests for official records, information or testimony. ( a ) Requests must be in writing and must be submitted to the General Counsel. If a subpoena is served on the Committee or a Committee employee before submitting a written request and receiving a final determination, the Committee will object to the subpoena on grounds that it was not submitted in accordance with this part.
( b ) Written requests must contain the following information: ( 1 ) The caption of the legal proceeding, docket number, and name and address of the court or other authority involved;
( 2 ) A copy of the complaint or equivalent document setting forth the assertions in the case and any other pleading or document necessary to show the relevance of the information sought;
( 3 ) A detailed description of how the information sought is relevant to the issues in the legal proceeding, and a specific description of the substance of the testimony or records sought;
( 4 ) A statement as to how the need for the information outweighs the need to maintain any confidentiality of the information and outweighs the burden on the Committee to produce the records or provide testimony;
( 5 ) A statement indicating that the information sought is not available from another source, from other persons or entities, or from the testimony of someone other than a Committee employee, such as a retained expert;
( 6 ) If testimony is requested, the intended use of the testimony, a general summary of the desired testimony, and a showing that no document could be provided and used in lieu of testimony;
( 7 ) A description of all prior decisions, orders, or pending motions in the case that bear upon the relevance of the requested records or testimony;
( 8 ) The name, address, and telephone number of counsel to each party in the case; and
( 9 ) An estimate of the amount of time that the requester and other parties will require with each Committee employee for time spent by the employee to prepare for testimony, in travel, and for attendance at the legal proceeding.
( c ) The Committee reserves the right to require additional information to complete any request where appropriate.
( d ) Requests should be submitted at least 45 calendar days before the date that records or testimony is required. Requests submitted in less than 45 calendar days before records or testimony is required must be accompanied by a written explanation stating the reasons for the late request and the reasons for expedited processing.
( e ) Failure to cooperate in good faith to enable the General Counsel to make an informed decision may serve as the basis for a determination not to comply with the request.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1830 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 103 ) IV-C-6

9 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/13/20087:20:56

AM Sheet 103 of 232EL2 _ 

### 0-87-J . ± 'JC Z- © - UNITED STATE S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONAGENCY

WASHINGTON

, D.C . 2046 0 

### FE B Ir : !' '

OFFIC EO F AI RAN D RADIATIO N Honorabl e Chi c Hech t Unite d State s Senat e Washington , D . C . 2051 0 Dea r Senato r Hecht : Than k yo u fo r passin g alon g th e comment s o f you r constituent s concernin g EPA' s proposa l t o requir e onboar d refuelin g emissio ncontrol s andpropose dgasolin e volatilit y regulations . B e assure d tha t thes e comment s wil l b e considere d i nth e nex t phas e o f ou r rulemakin g process . W e wil l als o b e placin g the m

i nth e publi c docket s fo r th e rulemaking . Than k yo u agai nfo r you r concer ni nthi s matter . Sincerel yyours , "' . L 0 : . E DY Richar dD . Wilso n Director , Offic e o f Mobil e Source s cc : Docke t A-87-1 1 Docke t A-85-2 1
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTIONS 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of MDI Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on November 12, 2002 (the "Periodic Report"),
I, Thomas K. Andrew, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002, that:

     1.  The Periodic report fully complies with the requirements of
         section 13(a) or 15(d) of the securities Exchange Act of 1934
         (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d); and
     2.  The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.



/s/ Thomas K. Andrew

Thomas K. Andrew
Chief Financial Officer
MDI Technologies, Inc.
November 12, 2002
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the National Advisory Eye Council.

The meeting will be open to the public as indicated below, with attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in advance of the meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), TItle 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and/or contract proposals and the discussions could disclose  confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications and/or contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Advisory Eye Council.                    

*Date:*                         September 14, 2006.                    

*Closed:*                         8:30 a.m. to 12 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Terrace Level Conference Center, Bethesda, MD 20892.                     

*Open:*                         2 p.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         Following opening remarks by the Director, NEI there will be  presentations by the staff of the Institute and discussions concerning Institute programs.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Terrace Level Conference Center, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Lore Anne McNicol, PhD, Director, Division of Extramural Research, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 451-2020.                    

Any interested person may file written comments with the committees by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional affiliation of the interested person.

                        Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home page:                         *www.nei.nih.gov,*                         where an agenda and any additional information  for the meeting will be posted when available.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.867, Vision Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 14, 2006.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 06-7018 Filed 8-17-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01—M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1688

MUD LICK MINING CORPORATION; AMERICAN MINING INSURANCE 

COMPANY,

Petitioners,

v.

CHARLES R. HASH; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION 

PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

(11-0402 BLA)

Submitted: March 28, 2014 Decided: April 11, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John R. Sigmond, PENN, STUART & ESKRIDGE, Bristol, Tennessee, 

for Petitioners. Joseph E. Wolfe, Ryan C. Gilligan, WOLFE, 

WILLIAMS, RUTHERFORD & REYNOLDS, Norton, Virginia; M. Patricia 

Smith, Solicitor of Labor, Rae Ellen James, Associate Solicitor, 

Gary K. Stearman, Appellate Litigation, Jonathan P. Rolfe, 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for 

Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Mud Lick Mining Corporation and American Mining

Insurance Company seek review of the Benefits Review Board’s 

decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s 

award of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 

(2012). We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on 

appeal and conclude that the Board’s decision is based upon 

substantial evidence and is without reversible error. 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons 

stated by the Board. Mud Lick Mining Corp. v. Hash, No. 11-0402 

BLA (B.R.B. Mar. 29, 2012). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
H. R. 4452

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four

An Act

To designate the United States Post Office building located at 115 North Chester

in Ruleville, Mississippi, as the ‘‘Fannie Lou Hamer Post Office’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The United States Post Office building located at 115 North

Chester in Ruleville, Mississippi, shall be known and designated

as the ‘‘Fannie Lou Hamer Post Office’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the building referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the Fannie

Lou Hamer Post Office.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 153 (Wednesday, August 9, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45597-45598]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6798]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service


Financial Management Service; Senior Executive Service; Financial 
Management Performance Review Board (PRB)

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 45598]]

SUMMARY: This notice announces the appointment of members to the 
Financial Management Service (FMS) Performance Review Board (PRB).

DATES: This notice is effective on August 9, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judith R. Tillman, Deputy 
Commissioner, Financial Management Service, 401 14th Street, SW., 
Washington, DC; telephone (202) 874-7000.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), this notice 
is given of the appointment of individuals to serve as members of the 
FMS PRB. This Board reviews the performance appraisals of career senior 
executives below the Assistant Commissioner level and makes 
recommendations regarding ratings, bonuses, and other personnel 
actions. Four voting members constitute a quorum. The names and titles 
of the FMS PRB members are as follows:

Primary Members

Judith R. Tillman, Deputy Commissioner
Gary Grippo, Assistant Commissioner, Federal Finance
J. Martin Mills, Assistant Commissioner, Debt Management Services
Wanda Rogers, Assistant Commissioner, Financial Operations
    Charles R. Simpson, Assistant Commissioner, Information Resources
    D. James Sturgill, Assistant Commissioner, Governmentwide 
Accounting

Alternate Member

Scott H. Johnson, Assistant Commissioner, Management (Chief Financial 
Officer)

    Dated: August 4, 2006.
Judith R. Tillman,
Deputy Commissioner.
[FR Doc. 06-6798 Filed 8-8-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
V

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4798

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade for the vessel SPIRIT OF THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 19, 1994

Mr. TAUZIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

SPIRIT OF THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

4 Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the Act of June 19, 1886

5 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106 of title 46,

6 United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may

7 issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate en8 dorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the
2

HR 4798 IH

1 vessel SPIRIT OF THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST

2 (United States official number 725338).

Æ
#### State *vs.*Forrest B. Morgan.

JULY 22, 1946.

Present : Flynn, C. J., Moss, Capotosto and Baker, JJ.

Per Curiam.

This is a criminal complaint and warrant charging the defendant with the illegal parking of an automobile on a highway in the city of Providence. The case was heard in the superior court by a justice thereof sitting without a jury. He adjudged the defendant guilty and the latter duly prosecuted his bill of exceptions to this court.

The defendant waived any question concerning the constitutionality of the pertinent statutes and regulations. It *102was not disputed that the automobile was parked in an area where parking was prohibited. It was agreed by the parties that the sole issue was the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conclusion that the defendant had parked or allowed the automobile to be parked in violation of law. The decisive question therefore is whether, in the absence of any rule of evidence appearing in the enabling statute or municipal traffic regulations, the mere proof of the registration of the automobile in defendant’s name, without more, is enough to support an inference that he had parked or allowed the automobile to be so parked, and to sustain a conviction if such inference is not explained or refuted by other evidence.

*John H. Nolan,*Attorney General, *James F. McCoy,*Special Counsel, for State.

*Forrest Morgan,*pro se.

The court as constituted at the time the case was argued is evenly divided as to the correct answer to the above question. Under these circumstances the defendant’s' exception cannot be sustained, and therefore the decision of the superior court finding the defendant guilty stands.

The case is remitted to the superior court for further proceedings.
NUMBER 13-20-00443-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG 

 

IN RE MARK A. CANTU

 

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Hinojosa1

Relator Mark A. Cantu, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of mandamus 

seeking to compel the trial court to hold a hearing and rule on “Plaintiff’s Second Amended 

Motion to Dismiss a/k/a Plea to the Jurisdiction.” Relator has also filed an emergency 

motion seeking to stay depositions which are scheduled for November 2, 3, and 4. We 

deny both the petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency relief without 

prejudice.

1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When granting relief, the court must hand down an opinion as in 

any other case,” but when “denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do 

so.”); id. R. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).
2

To obtain relief by writ of mandamus, a relator must establish that the trial court 

committed a clear abuse of discretion and that there is no adequate remedy by appeal. 

In re Nationwide Ins. Co. of Am., 494 S.W.3d 708, 712 (Tex. 2016) (orig. proceeding); In 

re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding); 

Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839–40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). The relator 

bears the burden to properly request and show entitlement to mandamus relief. See 

Walker, 827 S.W.2d at 837; see In re Carrington, 438 S.W.3d 867, 868 (Tex. App.—

Amarillo 2014, orig. proceeding); In re Villarreal, 96 S.W.3d 708, 710 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 

2003, orig. proceeding). This burden requires that relator provide the reviewing court with 

a sufficient record to establish the right to mandamus relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7; 

Walker, 827 S.W.2d at 837; In re Carrington, 438 S.W.3d at 869; In re Davidson, 153 

S.W.3d 490, 491 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2004, orig. proceeding).

Because relator failed to provide us with a record to support his petition for writ of 

mandamus and motion for emergency relief, this Court concludes that he has not met his 

burden to obtain relief. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus and motion 

for emergency relief without prejudice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a), 52.10(b).

LETICIA HINOJOSA

Justice

Delivered and filed the

30th day of October, 2020.
§ 73.3568 Dismissal of applications. ( a ) ( 1 ) Failure to prosecute an application, or failure to respond to official correspondence or request for additional information, will be cause for dismissal.
( 2 ) Applicants in all broadcast services subject to competitive bidding will be subject to the provisions of §§ 73.5002 and 1.2105(b) regarding the dismissal of their short-form applications.
( 3 ) Applicants in all broadcast services subject to competitive bidding will be subject to the provisions of §§ 73.5004, 73.5005 and 1.2104(g) regarding the dismissal of their long-form applications and the imposition of applicable withdrawal, default and disqualification payments.
( b ) ( 1 ) Subject to the provisions of § 73.3525, dismissal of applications for channels reserved for noncommercial educational use will be without prejudice where an application has not yet been designated for hearing, but may be made with prejudice after designation for hearing.
( 2 ) Subject to the provisions of § 73.3525, requests to dismiss an application for a channel reserved for noncommercial educational use, without prejudice, after it has been designated for hearing, will be considered only upon written petition properly served upon all parties of record. Such requests shall be granted only upon a showing that the request is based on circumstances wholly beyond the applicant's control which preclude further prosecution of his application.
( c ) Subject to the provisions of §§ 73.3523 and 73.3525, any application for minor modification of facilities may, upon request of the applicant, be dismissed without prejudice as a matter of right.
( d ) An applicant's request for the return of an application that has been accepted for filing will be regarded as a request for dismissal.
[63 FR 48624, Sept. 11, 1998]
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the  Annual  Report of  Celadon  Group,  Inc.,  a  Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2004 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Paul A. Will,  Chief Financial  Officer,  Treasurer and Assistant
Secretary of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date: September 13, 2004                  /s/ Paul A. Will
                                       --------------------------------
                                       Paul A. Will
                                       Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and
                                       Assistant Secretary
§ 78.59 Posting of station and operator licenses. ( a ) The station license and any other instrument of authorization or individual order concerning the construction or the equipment or manner of operation shall be posted at the place where the transmitter is located, so that all terms thereof are visible except as otherwise provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
( b ) In cases where the transmitter is operated by remote control, the documents referred to in paragraph (a) of this section shall be posted in the manner described at the control point of the transmitter.
( c ) In cases where the transmitter is operated unattended, the name of the licensee and the call sign of the unattended station shall be displayed at the transmitter site on the structure supporting the transmitting antenna, so as to be visible to a person standing on the ground at the transmitter site. The display shall be prepared so as to withstand normal weathering for a reasonable period of time and shall be maintained in a legible condition at all times by the licensee. The station license and other documents referred to in paragraph (a) of this section shall be kept at the nearest attended station or, in cases where the licensee of the unattended station does not operate attended stations, at the point of destination of the signals relayed by the unattended station.
[37 FR 3292, Feb. 12, 1972, as amended at 49 FR 20671, May 16, 1984]
FORM 18. Joint Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal Form 18

March 2023

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

JOINT STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

Case Number

Short Case Caption

Instructions. Use this form only to file a joint stipulation of voluntary dismissal 

pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b)(1). This form may not be used if a motion is required 

pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b)(2)-(3). Below, please identify each case number to be 

dismissed separately, including any consolidated case numbers.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b)(1), all parties hereby stipulate

to the voluntary dismissal of the below-noted case number(s): 

Costs are to be assigned as follows: 

Each side shall bear their own costs.

Other:

Date: Signature: 

Name:

Party Name: 

Date: Signature: ______________________________ 

Name: ______________________________ 

Party Name: ______________________________ 

Additional pages attached