alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 161 (Monday, August 21, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 48578]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7066]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Public Notice for Waiver of Aeronautical Land-Use Assurance 
Watertown Municipal Airport, Watertown, WI

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent of waiver with respect to land.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is giving notice 
that a portion of the airport property containing 2.3 acres located at 
the southeast corner of Air Park Drive and Airport Rd. is not needed 
for aeronautical use as currently identified on the airport Layout 
Plan.
    This parcel was originally acquired through Grant No. AIP-01 in 
1989. The parcel was an uneconomic remnant left from reconfiguration of 
a roadway intersection alongside the edge of the airport. The parcel is 
segregated from the airport and is not accessible from the air 
operations area. The land comprising this parcel is, therefore, no 
longer needed for aeronautical purposes. Income from the sale will be 
used to improve the airport. There are no impacts to the airport by 
allowing the airport to dispose of the property.
    In accordance with section 47107(h) of title 49, United States 
Code, this notice is required to be published in the Federal Register 
30 days before modifying the land-use assurance that requires the 
property to be used for an aeronautical purpose.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 20, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Sandra E. DePottey, Program 
Manager, Federal Aviation Administration, Airports District Office, 
6020 28th Avenue South, Room 102, Minneapolis, MN 55450-2706. Telephone 
Number (612) 713-4363/FAX Number (612) 713-4364. Documents reflecting 
this FAA action may be reviewed at this same location or at the 
Watertown Municipal Airport, Watertown, WI.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice announces that the FAA intends 
to authorize the disposal of the subject airport property at Watertown 
Municipal Airport, Watertown, WI.
    Approval does not constitute a commitment by the FAA to financially 
assist in the disposal of the subject airport property nor a 
determination that all measures covered by the program are eligible for 
Airport Improvement Program funding from the FAA. The disposition of 
proceeds from the disposal of the airport property will be in 
accordance with FAA's Policy and Procedures Concerning the Use of 
Airport Revenue, published in the Federal Register on February 16, 
1999.

    Issued in Minneapolis, MN on August 3, 2006.
Robert A. Huber,
Manager, Minneapolis Airports District Office, FAA, Great Lakes Region.
[FR Doc. 06-7066 Filed 8-18-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13M
From: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Heidi King <hking@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Deirdre Murphy/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Nealson 

Watkins/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lewis Weinstock/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 01/26/2011 04:54 PM

Subject: Answers to your cost questions on the CO NAAQS monitoring network

Heidi, 

Please find below a redline version of the EO section of the CO NAAQS package which addresses the 

cost of the monitoring network. Deirdre thoughtfully created both a pdf and Word version, as we weren't 

sure which you would like. In addition, Nealson provided the following information to answer your 

question, which apparently would not otherwise be answered in the ICR:

The ICR requires creating an estimate for operation of the entire network. This estimate as an 

annual average reporting burden for the collection under 40 CFR part 58 (averaged over the 

first 3 years of this ICR) for a network of 311 CO monitors is $7,235,483. The portion of 

this cost specifically attributable to installing/relocating existing CO monitors at an estimated 

75 new near-road NO2 sites, is estimated to be $8728 per year. For purposes of calculating 

the annual cost of the network, the relocation cost for these 75 monitors was amortized over 

7 years. Thus the total cost for installing/relocating is $61,098.

Please let me know if you have any other questions about the CO network costs. If not, could you let me 

know when you might clear the package? Thanks very much. I hope you are not having travel difficulties 

because of the snow. 

Lydia
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            College of Information and Cyberspace
                    National Defense University
                CIC
        Search
                    Search CIC:
                        Search
                Search CIC:
                    Search
    Home

    About 
        Mission & Vision

    Faculty & Staff

    Fact Sheet

    Alumni

    Internships

    FAQ

    Admissions 
        Eligibility Requirements

    Admissions Calendar

    Application Instructions

    Apply Online

    International Students

    Academics 
        Graduate Catalog

    M.S. in Strategic Information and Cyberspace Studies
        
        JPME Master's Degree

    Cyber Workforce Master's Degree (Part Time)

    Leadership Development Programs

    Graduate Certificates

    Academic Partners

    Current Students 
        JPME II  Incoming Students

    LDP Incoming Students

    Student Registration

    Bring Your Own Device

    IA Compliance

    Completion Procedures / Order Transcripts

    Student Services and Resources

    Events
    
        Cyber Beacon

    Cyber PME Colloquium

    Hopper Award

    Lecture Series

    CYBERCOM Symposium

    NEWS

    UC2
    
        About

    Events

    Work With Us

    Center for Cybersecurity
    
        About

    Cybersecurity Center POC

    Cybersecurity Supporting Faculty

    CAE-CDE CISO Certificate Program

    Cybersecurity Trending News

    Cyber Labs
        
        Ethical Hacking

    Critical Infrastructure - SCADA

    Cyber Exercises
        
        Tabletop Exercise

    Cyber Competitions

    Cyber Resources and Awareness

    Stakeholder / Industry Advisory Council

    Contact 
        Contact Us

    Directions

    Access to Ft. McNair

    Map of Ft. McNair  Home
  NEWS
  News & Announcements
 News & Announcements News
 SAVE THE DATE: NDU Master's Degree Graduation will be Thursday, June 9, 2016
 https://calendar.ndu.edu/CalendarNOW.aspx
 SHARE
 PRINT
 National Defense University


College of Information and Cyberspace

300 Fifth Ave., Bldg. 62
Fort Lesley J. McNair
Washington, DC 20319-5066

202-685-6300
                    Stay Connected
                
                
                DOD Privacy & Security
 DOD Links Disclaimer
 DOD Social Media Policy
 DOD Web Policy
 FOIA
 NDU System of Records Notice
 NDU Privacy & Security Notice
 No FEAR Act
 Open GOV
 Plain Writing Act
 Section 508
 Small Business Act
 USA.gov
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

FORM OF RULE 13a-14(a)

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Fernando Sanchez, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of ArthroCare Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I am responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
and



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation.



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control.



|                     |  |     |  |                                                                   
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 31, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/    FERNANDO
SANCHEZ                                           
|                     |  |     |  | Fernando Sanchez Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
No. 11-9982.

#### Nowell *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
###### Editorial Note on Part 36

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 74 FR 23956, May 22, 2009, 77 FR 30411, May 23, 2012, 82 FR 25538, June 2, 2017, and corrected at 83 FR 4153, Jan. 30, 2018. Nomenclature changes to part 36 also appear at 83 FR 63587, Dec. 11, 2018, and 84 FR 4360, Feb. 15, 2019.

#### § 36.391 General.

Corporate Operations Expenses are included in the following account:

| General and Administrative | Account 6720. |
| --- | --- |

[69 FR 12552, Mar. 17, 2004]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Office of the Secretary 

# AGENCY:

Office of the Secretary, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of public meetings of the Invasive Species Advisory Committee. 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is hereby given of meetings of the Invasive Species Advisory Committee. The purpose of the Advisory Committee is to provide advice to the National Invasive Species Council, as authorized by Executive Order 13112, on a broad array of issues related to preventing the introduction of invasive species and providing for their control and minimizing the economic, ecological, and human health impacts that invasive species cause. The Council is co-chaired by the Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary of Agriculture, and the Secretary of Commerce. The duty of the Council is to provide national leadership regarding invasive species issues. The purpose of a meeting on September 12-13, 2006 is to convene the full Advisory Committee and to discuss implementation of action items outlined in the National Invasive Species Management Plan, which was finalized on January 18, 2001. 

# DATES:

Meeting of Invasive Species Advisory Committee: Tuesday, September 12, 2006, through Wednesday, September 13, 2006; beginning at approximately 8 a.m., and ending at approximately 5 p.m. each day. 

# ADDRESSES:

Hotel Washington, 515 15th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20004. Meeting will be held both days in the Washington Room. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kelsey Brantley, National Invasive Species Council Program Analyst; Phone: (202) 513-7243; Fax: (202) 371-1751. 

Dated: August 8, 2006. 

Lori C. Williams, 

Executive Director, National Invasive Species Council. 

[FR Doc. 06-7135 Filed 8-22-06; 9:46 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-RK-P
69–008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 106–94

PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.J. RES. 37, TAX

LIMITATION CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT

APRIL 14 (legislative day, April 13), 1999.—Referred to the House Calendar and

ordered to be printed

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 139]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 139, by a record vote of 7 to 1, report the same to the

House with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of H.J. Res. 37, the

‘‘Tax Limitation Constitutional Amendment,’’ under a structured

rule. The rule provides three hours of debate divided equally between the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary.

The resolution provides for one motion to amend if offered by the

Minority Leader or his designee, which shall be considered as read

and shall be separately debatable for one hour equally divided and

controlled by the proponent and an opponent. Finally, the rule provides for one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

COMMITTEE VOTES

Pursuant to clause 3(b) of House rule XIII the results of each

record vote on an amendment or motion to report, together with

the names of those voting for and against, are printed below:

Rules Committee Record Vote No. 12

Date: April 13, 1999.

Measure: H.J. Res. 37, Tax Limitation Constitutional Amendment.

Motion By: Mr. Moakley.
2

Summary of Motion: Make in order an amendment by Mr. Watt

regarding the scope of judicial review.

Results: Defeated 1–7.

Vote by Member: Linder—nay; Pryce—nay; Diaz-Balart—nay;

Hastings—nay; Myrick—nay; Sessions—nay; Moakley—yea;

Dreier—nay.

Rules Committee Record Vote No. 13

Dated: April 13, 1999.

Measure: H.J. Res. 37, Tax Limitation Constitutional Amendment.

Motion By: Mr. Moakley.

Summary of Motion: Make in order an amendment by Mr. Scott

striking the language excepting revenue increases of de minimis

amounts.

Results: Defeated 1–7.

Vote by Member: Linder—nay; Pryce—nay; Diaz-Balart—nay;

Hastings—nay; Myrick—nay; Session—nay; Moakley—yea;

Dreier—nay.

Rules Committee Record Vote No. 14

Dated: April 13, 1999.

Measure: H.J. Res. 37, Tax Limitation Constitutional Amendment.

Motion By: Ms. Pryce.

Summary of Motion: Report the resolution to the House.

Results: Approved 7–1.

Vote by Member: Linder—yea; Pryce—yea; Diaz-Balart—yea;

Hastings—yea; Myrick—yea; Sessions—yea; Moakley—nay;

Dreier—yea.

Æ
No. 11-9310.

#### Thompson *v.*Brown, Superintendent, Eastern New York Correctional Facility.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certio-rari denied.
A rt h u r

B r u l e O g a l l a l a P a xt o n S u t h e r l a n d N o rt h P l a t t e

B r a d y 2 0 1 9 1 8 1 7 1 6 1 5 1 4 1 3 1 2 4 1 4 0 3 9 3 8 3 7 3 6 3 5 3 4 3 3 3 2 3 1 3 0 2 9 2 8 2 7 2 6 

## W e l l D r i l l i n g S u s p e n s i o n s & S t a y s o n I r r i g a t e d A c r e s w i t h i n t h e Tw i n P l a t t e N a t u r a l R e s o u r c e s D i s t r i c t



# L e g e n d A f f e c t e d a r e a w i t h i n t h e T P N R D M a j o r H i g h w a y
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4785

To amend the Act of March 3, 1931 (known as the Davis-Bacon Act)

to require that contract work covered by the Act which requires licensing

be performed by a person who is so licensed.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 19, 1994

Mrs. MINK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Education and Labor

A BILL

To amend the Act of March 3, 1931 (known as the DavisBacon Act) to require that contract work covered by

the Act which requires licensing be performed by a person who is so licensed.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LICENSING.

4 Subsection (a) of the first section of the Act of March

5 3, 1931 (known as the Davis-Bacon Act) is amended by

6 adding at the end the following: ‘‘A contract covered by

7 this subsection which is to be carried out in a State which

8 requires persons performing the work under the contract
2

•HR 4785 IH

1 to be licensed shall be carried out by a person who is so

2 licensed.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority (the Authority), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge,
on the date hereof:



|(a) | this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Authority for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Authority.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/    LEO M.
CHUPASKALeo M. ChupaskaChief Financial Officer, Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityDecember 29, 2010


A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Authority and will be retained by the Authority and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 80.1013 Receiver.

The bridge-to-bridge receiver must be capable of reception of G3E emission on the navigational frequency 156.650 MHz (Channel 13) and the Coast Guard liaison frequency 157.100 MHz (Channel 22A). In addition, the bridge-to-bridge receiver must be capable of reception of G3E emission on the navigational frequency of 156.375 MHz (Channel 67) while transiting in the waters of the lower Mississippi River as described in §§ 80.1011 (a)(1), (a)(2) and (a)(3) of this part.

[57 FR 61012, Dec. 23, 1992]
#### Harold E. HOERTKORN v. CANONSBURG POTTERY CO., Appellant.

No. 10369.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued March 19, 1951.

Decided March 26, 1951.

William G. Heiner, Pittsburgh, Pa. (David B. Campbell, Canonsburg, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

James A. Wright, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Joseph H. Reich, Thomas Park Shearer, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN and STALEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This case presents a claim on behalf of a plaintiff against a defendant for violation of an alleged agreement to pay commissions to the plaintiff, a salesman. Plaintiff had a verdict and judgment in the trial court and the defendant appeals. No federal question is involved; the federal court has jurisdiction on grounds of diversity *734only. Nor does the case present any legal question on which the parties are in dispute. The plaintiff’s verdict was for considerably less than he claimed, but he makes no point of that. Questions of fact were submitted to a jury by the Trial Judge and we do not find in the verdict or the manner m which the case was submitted any error which seems to us grounds for reversal.

The judgment will, therefore, be affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 17, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-50813 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus GUSTAVO ADOLFO PAXTOR, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-121-ALL-LY

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Gustavo Adolfo Paxtor raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.