alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 64.2117 Use of Registered Intermediate Providers. ( a ) *Prohibition on use of unregistered intermediate providers.* A covered provider shall not use an intermediate provider to carry, route, or transmit covered voice communications unless such intermediate provider is registered pursuant to section 64.2115 of this subpart.
( b ) *Force majeure exemption.* ( 1 ) If, due to a *force majeure* for which a covered provider has instituted a disaster recovery plan, there are no registered intermediate providers available to carry, route, or transmit covered voice communications, a covered provider need not comply with paragraph (a) of this section for a period of up to 180 days with respect to those covered voice communications. A covered provider shall submit to the Commission a certification, signed by a corporate officer or official with authority to bind the corporation, and knowledge of the details of the covered provider's inability to comply with our rules, explaining the circumstances justifying an exemption under this section as soon as practicable.
( 2 ) A covered provider seeking an extension of the exemption described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section must submit a request for an extension of the exemption period to the Commission. Such an extension request shall, at minimum, include a status report on the covered provider's attempts to comply with paragraph (a) of this section; and a statement detailing how the covered provider intends to ensure that calls are completed notwithstanding the unavailability of registered intermediate providers.
( 3 ) For purposes of this section, “*force majeure”* means a highly disruptive event beyond the control of the covered provider, such as a natural disaster or a terrorist attack.
( 4 ) For purposes of this section, “disaster recovery plan” means a disaster response plan developed by the covered provider for the purpose of responding to a *force majeure* event.
[83 FR 47309, Sept. 19, 2018]
#### STATE v. JOHN O’NEIL.

January Term, 1894.

*Motion in arrest. When and where filed in criminal cause.*

x. A motion in arrest of judgment cannot be filed in the supi'eme court in a criminal cause.

2. In this case there was judgment on the verdict in the county court, and that is another reason why a motion in arrest could not be filed in supreme court, since such a motion must be interposed before judgment.

Prosecution for the unlawful furnishing of intoxicating liquor. Heard upon motion in ai'rest of judgment filed for the first time in supreme court. The opinion- states the case.

*y. C. Baker*for the respondent.

*y. C.*yones, state’s attorney, and *C. A. Prouty*for the state.

The respondent cannot file his motion in arrest in this coui't. It should have been filed in the county court and brought up from there by exceptions. 2 Thom. Tr., ss. 2726, 2775 ; R. L., ss. 782, 1699, 1700.

Moreover, in this case, the county court rendered judgment, and it was only upon the theory that that judgment became final by the overruling of the respondent’s exceptions that the cause coxxld be taken to the United States Supreme Court. Desty, Fed. P1-0., p. 331, s. 709.

*357ROWELL, J.~

At the March term, 1883, of the Rutland County Court, on trial by jury, the respondent was found guilty of three hundred and seven second offences of selling intoxicating liquor in violation of law, and a judgment of guilty was rendered on the verdict accordingly. The respondent excepted, and the case thereupon passed to this court for final decision, where such proceedings were had therein that the respondent took nothing by his exceptions, and the judgment below was affirmed. 58 Vt. 140.

The respondent then carried the case to the Supreme Court of the United States by virtue of a writ of error, where such proceedings were had therein that said writ was dismissed for want of jurisdiction, and the cause remanded to this court to be proceeded with. 144 U. S. 323.

At the first term of this court after the case came back, the respondent filed a motion in arrest of judgment, for that the statute of this State under which he was convicted is in violation of the interstate commerce clause of the Constitution of the United States and therefore void, and in conflict with section 1 of the 14th Amendment, and also of the 8th Article of the Amendments, which provides that excessive fines shall not be imposed nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. The case was heard at this term on said motion.

It is held in *State*v. *Hodgson, ante*134, that a motion in arrest of judgment cannot be filed in this court in a criminal case. We refer to that case for the ground and reason of the holding.

There is another reason why the motion in the case at bar cannot be sustained; it was filed after judgment, whereas such a motion must, necessarily, be filed before judgment.

*The motion is overruled, sentence passed, and execution ordered.*
November 21,2014 Director, Chemical Control Division US Environmental Protection Agency Office ofPollution Prevention and Taxies EPA East Room 4146 1201 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 

### Re: EPA- HQ- OPPT- 2003 - 0012 CBIC Control Number 

# 362739 RECEIVED OPPT CBIC 

## 201Y NOV 2lf 

## M111: II DuPont Chemicals and Fluoroproducts Chambers Works Deepwater, NJ 08023



### DuPont Chambers Works NJPDES Permit No. 

### NJ0005100 PFOAData Submittal- OutfallDSN662 Weekly Grab Samples October 2014 Sample Data Dear Chemical Control Division: Attachedplease find siunmaries ofPFOA analytical results for the DuPont Chambers Works weekly grab samples taken at**in~ernal** outfall DSN662Ain October 2014. 

### In accordance)with the current siteNJPDES permit (NJD005100, effective September 2011), these results are pr6vided to NJDEP ona monthly basis viaelectronic discharge monitoring reports. The enclosures include two paper andtwo electronic copies ofthe analytical results from this monitoringperiod.

## Sine~ 

# t Amutlia Jeyarajasingam AreaManager-SecureEnvironmental Treatment DuPont Chambers Works AJ/clc EnclosuresCopy to: Document Control Office US Environmental Protection Agency Office ofPollution Prevention and Taxies EPA East Room 6428 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20460 Ms. SusanRosenwinkel (cover letter only) PrincipalEnvironmental Engineer NJDEP Division ofWater Quality Bureau ofWater Surfacing Mail Code 40l-02B 401 E. State Street P.O. Box420 Trenton, NJ 08625-04201-UA Summary of Analytical Results 662- October2014 'IDL__§§2:GRABI 662-GRABI 662-GRJ\Ej[__ 662-GRAB Date Top (fl) Bottom (fl) Duplicate# lug/L IT

- I I 3.68 3.82 3.88 2.36 PFOA= ug/L = 1 lug/L = LOQ=limitof ::Acid ; per Liter

s per liter or parts per billion (ppb) n= 0.100 ug/L ; were analyzed by Critical Path Services LLC. Reported results 1 1 t a single analysis, except for the sample.-qollacted on 10/6/14. ision was obtained and the reported result for the sample d on 1d/6/14 represents the averaQe of lab duplicate results. The NJDEP lab· 1umber for Crfflcal Path ; is PA072.

::-·**~**..

<and ND = Non detect at stated reporting limit Page 1 of 1 Copy of cwk 662 grab results_oct14.xls:Sheet1 11/18/2014 1:53 PM
#### § 101.1317 Competitive bidding procedures for mutually exclusive MAS EA applications.

Mutually exclusive initial applications for licenses in the portions of the MAS bands licensed on a geographic area basis are subject to competitive bidding procedures. The general competitive bidding procedures set forth in part 1, subpart Q of this chapter will apply unless otherwise provided in this subpart.

[67 FR 46380, July 9, 2002]
§ 32.3410 Accumulated amortization—capitalized finance leases. ( a ) This account shall include the accumulated amortization associated with the investment contained in Account 2681, Finance Leases.
( b ) This account shall be credited with amounts for the amortization of finance leases concurrently charged to Account 6563, Amortization expense—tangible. (Note also Account 3300, Accumulated depreciation—nonoperating.)
( c ) When any item carried in Account 2681 is sold, is relinquished, or is otherwise retired from service, this account shall be charged with the cost of the retired item. Remaining amounts associated with the item shall be debited to Account 7100, Other operating income and expenses, or Account 7300, Nonoperating income and expense, as appropriate.
[51 FR 43499, Dec. 2, 1986, as amended at 67 FR 5688, Feb. 6, 2002; 69 FR 53649, Sept. 2, 2004; 84 FR 4730, Feb. 19, 2019]
#### § 73.825 Protection to reception of TV channel 6.

The following spacing requirements will apply to LPFM applications on Channels 201 through 220 unless the application is accompanied by a written agreement between the LPFM applicant and each affected TV Channel 6 broadcast station concurring with the proposed LPFM facilities.

(a) LPFM stations will be authorized on Channels 201 through 220 only if the pertinent minimum separation distances in the following table are met with respect to all full power TV Channel 6 stations.

| FM channel number | LPFM to TV channel 6 (km) |
| --- | --- |
| 201 | 140 |
| 202 | 138 |
| 203 | 137 |
| 204 | 136 |
| 205 | 135 |
| 206 | 133 |
| 207 | 133 |
| 208 | 133 |
| 209 | 133 |
| 210 | 133 |
| 211 | 133 |
| 212 | 132 |
| 213 | 132 |
| 214 | 132 |
| 215 | 131 |
| 216 | 131 |
| 217 | 131 |
| 218 | 131 |
| 219 | 130 |
| 220 | 130 |

(b) LPFM stations will be authorized on Channels 201 through 220 only if the pertinent minimum separation distances in the following table are met with respect to all low power TV, TV translator, and Class A TV stations authorized on TV Channel 6.

| FM channel number | LPFM to TV channel 6 (km) |
| --- | --- |
| 201 | 98 |
| 202 | 97 |
| 203 | 95 |
| 204 | 94 |
| 205 | 93 |
| 206 | 91 |
| 207 | 91 |
| 208 | 91 |
| 209 | 91 |
| 210 | 91 |
| 211 | 91 |
| 212 | 90 |
| 213 | 90 |
| 214 | 90 |
| 215 | 90 |
| 216 | 89 |
| 217 | 89 |
| 218 | 89 |
| 219 | 89 |
| 220 | 89 |

[[65 FR 67303](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/65-FR-67303), Nov. 9, 2000, as amended at [78 FR 2106](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/78-FR-2106), Jan. 9, 2013; [85 FR 35573](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/85-FR-35573), June 11, 2020]
#### § 18.309 Frequency range of measurements.

(a) For field strength measurements:

| Frequency band in which device operates (MHz) | Range of frequency measurements | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Lowest frequency | Highest frequency |
| Below 1.705 | Lowest frequency generated in the device, but not lower than 9 kHz | 30 MHz. |
| 1.705 to 30 | Lowest frequency generated in the device, but not lower than 9 kHz | 400 MHz. |
| 30 to 500 | Lowest frequency generated in the device or 25 MHz, whichever is lower | Tenth harmonic or 1,000 MHz, whichever is higher. |
| 500 to 1,000 | Lowest frequency generated in the device or 100 MHz, whichever is lower | Tenth harmonic. |
| Above 1,000 | ......do | Tenth harmonic or highest detectable emission. |

(b) For conducted powerline measurements, the frequency range over which the limits are specified will be scanned.

[[50 FR 36070](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/50-FR-36070), Sept. 5, 1985, as amended at [51 FR 17971](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/51-FR-17971), May 16, 1986]
#### § 54.1506 Stage 2 fixed support deployment milestones.

Recipients of support from Stage 2 of the fixed Uniendo a Puerto Rico Fund and the fixed Connect USVI Fund must complete deployment to at least 40 percent of supported locations at the end of the third year of support, at least 60 percent at the end of the fourth year, at least 80 percent at the end of the fifth year, and 100 percent by the end of the sixth year. Compliance with the percentage of completion shall be determined based on the total number of supported locations in each geographic area. Recipients will be subject to the notification and default rules in § 54.320(d).
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-10840

Summary Calendar

 

JOHN E. SCOTT,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TERRANCE A KING; TWELVE UNKNOWN DALLAS

POLICE OFFICERS; THE CITY OF DALLAS,

Defendants-Appellees.

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:97-CV-3062-R

---------------------

March 17, 1999

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

John E. Scott, Texas prisoner # 756455, seeks to proceed in

forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal following the district court’s

denial of his IFP motion for an appeal of the dismissal of his

civil rights complaint. Scott fails to challenge the reasons for

the district court’s denial of the IFP motion, and he fails to

show that his appeal has arguable merit and would be taken in 
No. 98-10840

- 2 -

good faith. See Brinkman v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner,

813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987); Jackson v. Dallas Police

Dep't, 811 F.2d 260, 261 (5th Cir. 1986); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). 

His motion to proceed IFP on appeal is DENIED, and his appeal is

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4598

AMENDMENT
In the Senate of the United States,

October 7 (legislative day, September 12), 1994.

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 4598) entitled ‘‘An Act to direct the Secretary of

the Interior to make technical corrections to maps relating to

the Coastal Barrier Resources System, and to authorize appropriations to carry out the Coastal Barrier Resources Act’’,

do pass with the following

AMENDMENT:

Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert:

1 SECTION 1. CORRECTION TO MAPS.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior shall,

3 not later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this

4 Act, make such corrections to the maps described in sub5 section (b) as are necessary to ensure that—

6 (1) depictions of areas on the maps are consist7 ent with the depictions of areas appearing on the

8 maps entitled ‘‘Coastal Barrier Resources System’’,

9 dated September 27, 1994, and on file with the Sec10 retary of the Interior; and

11 (2) the Coastal Barrier Resources System does

12 not include any area that, on the day before the date

13 of the enactment of this Act, was part of unit FL–

14 05P of the System.
2

HR 4598 EAS

1 (b) MAPS DESCRIBED.—The maps described in this

2 subsection are maps that—

3 (1) are included in a set of maps entitled

4 ‘‘Coastal Barrier Resources System’’, dated October

5 24, 1990; and

6 (2) related to the following units of the Coastal

7 Barrier Resources System: AL–01P, FL–05P; P11A,

8 P17, P17A, P18P, P19P, FL–15, FL–95P, FL–36P,

9 P31P, FL–72P, MI21, NY75, and VA62P.

10 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 12

11 of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3510) is

12 amended to read as follows:

13 ‘‘SEC. 12. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

14 ‘‘There are authorized to be appropriated to the Sec15 retary for carrying out this Act $2,000,000 for each of fiscal

16 years 1995 to 1998.’’.

Attest:

Secretary.
#### §§ 24.432-24.444 [Reserved]
302P15

#### State v. Harley David Hamlin

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA14-1191)

Denied
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**MOSSIMO, INC.**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Mossimo, Inc. (theCompany) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31,2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the Report), I Mossimo Giannulli, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to thebest of my knowledge:

(1)         The Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1,fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition, results of operations, and cashflows of the Company.
| /s/ Mossimo Giannulli                      |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Mossimo  Giannulli                         |   |
| *Chairman and Co-Chief  Executive Officer* |   |
| March 31,  2005                       |   |

 

A SIGNED ORIGINALOF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THECOMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION STAFF UPONREQUEST.

THIS CERTIFICATIONACCOMPANIES THE FORM 10-K TO WHICH IT RELATES, IS NOT DEEMED FILEDWITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION AND IS NOT TO BE INCORPORATED BYREFERENCE INTO A FILING OF THE COMPANY UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OR THESECURITIES ACT OF 1934 (WHETHER MADE BEFORE OR AFTER THE DATE OF THE FORM 10-K),IRRESPECTIVE OF ANY GENERAL INCORPORATION LANGUAGE CONTAINED IN SUCH FILING.

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NetFabric Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Vasan Thatham, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

November __, 2006


                                        /s/ Vasan Thatham
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name: Vasan Thatham
                                        Title: Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to NetFabric Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by NetFabric Holdings,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4678

To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to provide more program

specificity during consideration of concurrent resolutions on the budget,

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 29, 1994

Mr. ORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Rules

A BILL

To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to provide

more program specificity during consideration of concurrent resolutions on the budget, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Budget Resolution Ac5 countability Act of 1994’’.

6 SEC. 2. REPORTS ON CONCURRENT RESOLUTIONS ON THE

7 BUDGET.

8 Section 301(e) of the Congressional Budget Act of

9 1974 is amended by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of para-
2

•HR 4678 IH

1 graph (9), by striking the period and inserting ‘‘; and’’

2 at the end of paragraph (10), and by adding at the end

3 the following new paragraph:

4 ‘‘(11) each specific deviation from the budget

5 submitted by the President pursuant to section

6 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, by program

7 and amount.’’.

8 SEC. 3. SPECIFICITY OF AMENDMENTS TO CONCURRENT

9 RESOLUTIONS ON THE BUDGET.

10 (a) PROCEDURE IN HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.—

11 Section 305(a)(5) of the Congressional Budget Act of

12 1974 is amended by inserting after the first sentence the

13 following new sentence: ‘‘No amendment may be offered

14 that increases or decreases spending in any functional cat15 egory, unless a statement has been inserted in the Con16 gressional Record not later than the day before the

17 amendment is offered that identifies the specific program,

18 project, or activity that is to be increased or decreased,

19 as the case may be.’’.

20 (b) PROCEDURE IN SENATE.—Section 305(b)(2) of

21 the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 is amended by in22 serting after the second sentence the following new sen23 tence: ‘‘No amendment may be offered that increases

24 spending in any functional category, unless a statement

25 has been inserted in the Congressional Record not later
3

•HR 4678 IH

1 than the day before the amendment is offered that identi2 fies the specific program, project, or activity that is to be

3 increased or decreased, as the case may be.’’.

4 SEC. 4. SENSE OF THE HOUSE REGARDING AMENDMENTS

5 TO CONCURRENT RESOLUTIONS ON THE

6 BUDGET.

7 It is the sense of the House of Representatives that,

8 during consideration of a concurrent resolution on the

9 budget in the Committee of the Whole, the Committee on

10 Rules should allow specific amendments to increase or de11 crease particular functional categories and not only

12 amendments in the nature of a substitute.

Æ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

JASON ERIC KUHNS,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 306 WAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of October, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
```

[112th Congress Public Law 162]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 126 STAT. 1273]]

Public Law 112-162
112th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 150 South Union Street in Canton, Mississippi, as the ``First Sergeant 
 Landres Cheeks Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Aug. 10, 2012 -  [H.R. 
                                3772]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. FIRST SERGEANT LANDRES CHEEKS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 150 South Union Street in Canton, Mississippi, shall be known 
and designated as the ``First Sergeant Landres Cheeks Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``First 
Sergeant Landres Cheeks Post Office Building''.

    Approved August 10, 2012.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3772:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 158 (2012):
            June 26, 28, considered and passed House.
            Aug. 1, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```