alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          55,384                  41,742
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  177,572                 231,306
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               285,376                 330,480
<PP&E>                                       2,908,285               2,346,262
<DEPRECIATION>                                 584,198                 491,673
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,332,596               2,949,445
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          253,056                 164,345
<BONDS>                                        701,471                 771,021
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         1,043                   1,043
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,112,902               1,777,165
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,332,596               2,949,445
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               541,924                 509,890
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  345,132                 317,369
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,939                  12,682
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                200,865                 208,824
<INCOME-TAX>                                    59,255                  61,603
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            141,610                 147,221
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   141,610                 147,221
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.41                    1.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.41                    1.46


</TABLE>
Milford District Court

No. 81-374

#### Bielagus & Martina v. Joseph C. Devine

April 2, 1982

*Bielagus & Martina,*of Amherst *(Richard H. Hubbard*on the brief and orally), for the plaintiff.

*Nix and Wendell,*of Manchester *(Grenville Clark, III,*on the brief and orally), for the defendant.

Memorandum Opinion

The only issue presented on this appeal is whether, as found by the trial court, an accord and satisfaction in the amount of $1,000 *325was reached as final disposition of a dispute between a law firm and its client concerning the reasonableness of the firm’s fees for services rendered. The sum of $1,000 tendered by the defendant after a conversation with one of the partners was neither capricious nor patently unreasonable and arbitrary. Because no meaningful review of the Court’s *{Lynch,*A.J.) findings may be had without a transcript of the testimony, the order of the court below giving the plaintiff judgment for $1,000 is summarily affirmed. *See*Sup. Ct. Rs. 13(3), 15(3). The award of interest and costs to the plaintiff is vacated.

*Affirmed, except as to interest and costs.*
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Agency for Toxic Substances

and Disease Registry



## Memorandum

Date: August 2, 2011

From: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry

Subject: Comments on EPA’s Toxicological Review of Vanadium Pentoxide

To: Environmental Protection Agency

We appreciate the opportunity to review EPA’s Toxicological Review of Vanadium Pentoxide. Overall, we found the draft IRIS Toxicological Review and fact sheet well-written and concise. Studies of support within the document are sufficiently synthesized in a scientific manner to present the overall assessment of this substance as it relates to environmental health. The authors did a good job of stacking the evidence for the specific exposure and leading the reader to appropriate conclusions about vanadium pentoxide.

One minor editorial comment: On Page 14, last sentence under Oral Exposure:

there should be a comma after hair“...but not hair

, is a sensitive...”

1
Exhibit 3.1



CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT



TO



CERTIFICATE OF TRUST



Pursuant to Title 12, Section 3810(b) of the Delaware Statutory Trust Act, the undersigned, has executed the following Certificate Of Amendment To Certificate Of Trust:



FIRST. The name of the statutory trust is Prudential Securities Strategic
Trust.



SECOND. Article 1 of the Certificate of Trust shall be
amended in the entirety as follows: 1. Name: The name of the trust formed hereby is Futures Strategic Trust.



THIRD. This Certificate of Amendment shall be effective upon filing.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate Of Amendment To Certificate Of Trust as of October 1,
2004.



Wilmington Trust Company, not in its individual capacity but solely as TrusteeBy:

/s/ Rosemary KennardName:

Rosemary KennardTitle:

Assistant Vice President
#### § 69.701 Application of the rules in this subpart.

The rules in this subpart apply to all incumbent LECs subject to price cap regulation, as defined in § 61.3(bb) of this chapter, seeking pricing flexibility on the basis of the development of competition in parts of its service area for switched access services only.

[82 FR 25711, June 2, 2017]
#### § 73.854 Unlicensed radio operations.

No application for an LPFM station may be granted unless the applicant certifies, under penalty of perjury, that neither the applicant, nor any party to the application, has engaged in any manner, including individually or with persons, groups, organizations, or other entities, in the unlicensed operation of any station in violation of Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 301. If an application is dismissed pursuant to this section, the applicant is precluded from seeking *nunc pro tunc* reinstatement of the application and/or changing its directors to resolve the basic qualification issues.

[85 FR 7889, Feb. 12, 2020]
69–008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 106–49

PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 819, THE

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION AUTHORIZATION ACT

OF 1999

MARCH 10, 1999.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. MYRICK, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 104]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 104, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 819, the

‘‘Federal Maritime Commission Authorization Act of 1999’’ under

an open rule. The rule provides one hour of general debate divided

equally between the chairman and ranking minority member of the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. The rule provides

that the bill be considered as read.

Members who have preprinted their amendments in the Congressional Record prior to their consideration will be given priority in

recognition to offer their amendments if otherwise consistent with

House rules. The rule allows for the Chairman of the Committee

of the Whole to postpone votes during consideration of the bill, and

to reduce voting time to five minutes on a postponed question if the

vote follows a fifteen minute vote. Finally, the rule provides for one

motion to recommit, with or without instructions.

Æ
#### Scott M. SMITH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Keith E. OLSON, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 03-3239.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 3, 2004.*

Decided March 15, 2004.

Rehearing En Banc Denied May 7, 2004.

Scott M. Smith, United States Penitentiary, Terre Haute, IN, pro se.

Gerald A. Coraz, Office of the United States Attorney, Indianapolis, IN, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before RIPPLE, KANNE, and DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judges.

*

 After an examination of the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is unnecessary. Thus, the appeal is submitted on the briefs and the record. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

ORDER

Federal inmate Scott M. Smith petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, alleging that prison officials violated his Eighth Amendment and due process rights by assigning him to nonpun-itive administrative segregation without a hearing. The district court concluded that Smith’s petition did not satisfy the “in custody” element of § 2241 and denied it *sua sponte.*We affirm.

A prisoner seeking relief under § 2241 must first establish that he is “in custody” by virtue of the process or conduct he challenges, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2241(c); actions by prison authorities that relate only to conditions of confinement and not to the fact or duration of that confinement do not affect custody, *see Alejo v. Heller,*328 F.3d 930, 937 (7th Cir.2003); *Bunn v. Conley,*309 F.3d 1002, 1007 (7th Cir.2002); *De-Walt v. Carter,*224 F.3d 607, 617 (7th Cir.2000). Whether Smith is allowed to remain in the general population at his prison or instead is housed in administrative segregation is a decision that affects only his conditions of confinement. *See Bunn,*309 F.3d at 1008; *Montgomery v. Anderson,*262 F.3d 641, 643 (7th Cir.2001). As the district court correctly held, Mr. Smith does not have a due process liberty *182interest in remaining free from administrative segregation because such segregation does not impose an “atypical and significant hardship on the inmate in relation to the ordinary incidents of prison life.” *Sandin v. Conner,*515 U.S. 472, 484, 115 S.Ct. 2293, 132 L.Ed.2d 418 (1995); *Montgomery,*262 F.3d at 644. Accordingly, the district court’s denial of Mr. Smith’s writ of habeas corpus is affirmed.

AFFIRMED
February 23, 2015 

To A.J. Muldoon 

Post Office Box 1569 

Carlsbad, NM 88221-1569 

(575) 887-1191 

1-800-658-2713 

www.cityofcarlsbadnm.com 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

EAS@dot.gov, 

Dear Mr. Muldoon: 

DALEJANWAY 

MAYOR 

STEVE MCCUTCHEON 

CITYi.LD~STRATOR 

We want to first thank you for taking the time to meet with the delegation from Carlsbad, 

N.M. , during our time in Washington. The EAS program is very important to the City of 

Carlsbad and Eddy County. 

From the options provided by Boutique Air that fit within the guidelines outlined by the 

Department of Transportation, we would like to recommend 6 round trip flights per week (1 per 

day) to Dallas DFW and 6 round trip flights per week (1 per day) to Albuquerque Sunport. We 

feel this best suits the needs of the citizens of Carlsbad and will give us essential connections to 

the rest of the world from Carlsbad. 

Thank you for your consideration, and we look forward to a great working relationship in 

the future. 

Councilman Jason Shirley 

City of Carlsbad 

Councilman Richard e/~ Doss 

City of Carlsbad 

COUNCILORS 

Wanl4 

]ADLL E. WBITLOCJC
[No. 3137.]

#### Granville Harwood *v.*The State.

1. Practice in the Court oe Appeals.—A conviction cannot stand in this court when the transcript fails to bring up an indictment or information.

2. Substitution oe Lost Indictment.—Where an indictment has been accidentally destroyed after trial and conviction, it may be supplied either by a second indictment or by substitution in the mode provided by law.

Appeal from the County Court of Johnson. Tried below before the Hon. D. T. Bledsoe, Special County Judge.

The conviction in this case was for aggravated assault and battery, and the penalty imposed was a fine of four hundred dollars and confinement in the county jail for the period of twelve months.

The Reporters have received no brief for the appellant.

*J. H. Burts,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Willson, Judge.

There being no indictment or information in the record in this case, there is no legal foundation for the judgment of conviction, and it cannot, therefore, be permitted to stand. It appears that, after the conviction was had, the indictment was destroyed accidentally. It may yet be supplied, either by a second indictment by the grand jury, or by substitution in the mode provided by law. *(Turner*v. *The State, ante,*p. 378; *Schultz*v. *The State,*15 Texas Ct. App., 258.)

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

*Reversed and*remanded.

Opinion delivered June 11, 1884,
<PAGE>

                                                               EXHIBIT 23.0

GA FINANCIAL, INC.

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of GA Financial, Inc.:

     We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-66107 and 333-37837) on Form S-8 of GA Financial, Inc. of our report
dated March 5, 2004 with respect to the consolidated statements of financial
condition of GA Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and
2002 and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income,
shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2003 which report is incorporated by reference in the
December 31, 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K of GA Financial, Inc.


/s/ KPMG

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
March 10, 2004
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            College of Information and Cyberspace
                    National Defense University
                CIC
        Search
                    Search CIC:
                        Search
                Search CIC:
                    Search
    Home

    About 
        Mission & Vision

    Faculty & Staff

    Fact Sheet

    Alumni

    Internships

    FAQ

    Admissions 
        Eligibility Requirements

    Admissions Calendar

    Application Instructions

    Apply Online

    International Students

    Academics 
        Graduate Catalog

    M.S. in Strategic Information and Cyberspace Studies
        
        JPME Master's Degree

    Cyber Workforce Master's Degree (Part Time)

    Leadership Development Programs

    Graduate Certificates

    Academic Partners

    Current Students 
        JPME II  Incoming Students

    LDP Incoming Students

    Student Registration

    Bring Your Own Device

    IA Compliance

    Completion Procedures / Order Transcripts

    Student Services and Resources

    Events
    
        Cyber Beacon

    Cyber PME Colloquium

    Hopper Award

    Lecture Series

    CYBERCOM Symposium

    NEWS

    UC2
    
        About

    Events

    Work With Us

    Center for Cybersecurity
    
        About

    Cybersecurity Center POC

    Cybersecurity Supporting Faculty

    CAE-CDE CISO Certificate Program

    Cybersecurity Trending News

    Cyber Labs
        
        Ethical Hacking

    Critical Infrastructure - SCADA

    Cyber Exercises
        
        Tabletop Exercise

    Cyber Competitions

    Cyber Resources and Awareness

    Stakeholder / Industry Advisory Council

    Contact 
        Contact Us

    Directions

    Access to Ft. McNair

    Map of Ft. McNair  Home
  NEWS
  News & Announcements
 News & Announcements News
 Professor Tom Wingfield gave a talk  for Global Conversation
 Professor Tom Wingfield gave a talk at the British Embassy in Washington DC for the lecture series Global Conversation@UoEGlobalConvo The theme of the night: "Cyberwarfare - What is the Role of International Law?" Photos from the event are now available to view online: https://www.flickr.com/.../26126239@N02/sets/72157672158666373
 SHARE
 PRINT
 National Defense University


College of Information and Cyberspace

300 Fifth Ave., Bldg. 62
Fort Lesley J. McNair
Washington, DC 20319-5066

202-685-6300
                    Stay Connected
                
                
                DOD Privacy & Security
 DOD Links Disclaimer
 DOD Social Media Policy
 DOD Web Policy
 FOIA
 NDU System of Records Notice
 NDU Privacy & Security Notice
 No FEAR Act
 Open GOV
 Plain Writing Act
 Section 508
 Small Business Act
 USA.gov
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 442 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 442

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide payment for 
         dental services under part B of the medicare program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

   Mrs. Collins of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was 
  referred jointly to the Committees on Ways and Means and Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide payment for 
         dental services under part B of the medicare program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MEDICARE COVERAGE OF DENTAL SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--Section 1861(s) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395x(s)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(including dentures)'' after 
        ``prosthetic devices'' in paragraph (8) and striking ``internal 
        body'' and ``(other than dental)'' in such paragraph;
            (2) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (12);
            (3) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (14) and 
        inserting ``; and'';
            (4) by inserting after paragraph (14) the following new 
        paragraph:
            ``(15) services furnished in connection with the care, 
        treatment, filling, removal, or replacement of teeth or 
        structures directly supporting teeth.''; and
            (5) by redesignating paragraphs (15) and (16) as paragraphs 
        (16) and (17), respectively.
    (b) Repeal of Ground for Exclusion.--Section 1862(a) of such Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1395y) is amended by striking paragraph (12).
    (c) Conforming Amendments.--Sections 1864(a), 1865(a), 
1902(a)(9)(C), and 1915(a)(1)(B)(ii)(I) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395aa(a), 1395bb(a), 1396a(a)(9)(C), 1396n(a)(1)(B)(ii)(I)) are each 
amended by striking ``paragraphs (15) and (16)'' and inserting 
``paragraphs (16) and (17)''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by the first section of this Act shall be 
applicable with respect to services furnished on or after the first day 
of the first calendar month which begins more than sixty days after the 
date on which this Act is enacted.

                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                   SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY-EXHIBIT 21.1
                   ----------------------------------------


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   State or Other Jurisdiction of
                Subsidiary                          Incorporation of Organization
-------------------------------------------     -----------------------------------
<S>                                             <C>
Cotelligent of Boston, Inc.                     Massachusetts
Cotelligent Dallas, Inc.                        Texas
Cotelligent Dunwoody, Inc.                      Georgia
Cotelligent Fort Lauderdale, Inc.               Florida
Cotelligent Jonesboro, Inc.                     Georgia
Cotelligent Metro New York, Inc.                New Jersey
Cotelligent Minneapolis, Inc.                   Minnesota
Cotelligent Orange County, Inc.                 California
Cotelligent Philadelphia, Inc.                  Pennsylvania
Cotelligent Pittsburgh, Inc.                    Pennsylvania
Cotelligent Portland, Inc.                      Oregon
Cotelligent San Jose, Inc.                      California
Cotelligent San Mateo, Inc.                     California
Cotelligent Seattle, Inc.                       Washington
Cotelligent USA, Inc.                           California
Fastech, Inc.                                   Pennsylvania
GRI Inc. dba Global Resources                   California
HC Associates International, Inc.               Georgia
Information Systems Resources, Inc.             Florida
Mongan Enterprises, Inc. dba Intellitron        California
The Hurst Companies, Inc.                       Florida
</TABLE>
§ 32.24 Compensated absences. ( a ) Companies shall record a liability and charge the appropriate expense accounts for compensated absences (vacations, sick leave, etc.) in the year in which these benefits are earned by employees.
( b ) With respect to the liability that exists for compensated absences which is not yet recorded on the books as of the effective date of this part, the liability shall be recorded in Account 4130. Other current liabilities, with a corresponding entry to Account 1438, Deferred maintenance, retirements and other deferred charges. This deferred charge shall be amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of ten years.
( c ) Records shall be maintained so as to show that no more than ten percent of the deferred charge is being amortized each year.
[51 FR 43499, Dec. 2, 1986, as amended at 67 FR 5679, Feb. 6, 2002]