alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AMENDMENT TO THE
                  ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF QUAZON, CORP.
                  (changed herein to Scientific Energy, Inc)



          Pursuant to section 78.390 of the Nevada Revised Statutes, Quazon,
Corp, a Nevada corporation hereinafter referred to as the "Corporation,"
hereby adopts the following Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation.

      1.  Article I of the Articles of Incorporation shall be amended to
          state:

          The name of the corporation is "Scientific Energy, Inc."
          (hereinafter, the "Corporation").

      2.  The board of directors of the Corporation. by their unanimous
          consent dated July 16, 2001, has adopted a resolution setting forth
          the foregoing amendment, declaring its advisability, and submitting
          the amendment to the stockholders for their consideration.

      3.  The foregoing amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Quazon
          Corp. was authorized and approved pursuant to section 78.390 of the
          Nevada Revised Statutes by the holders of 21,658,820, or 93.9%, of
          the 23,058,000 issued and outstanding shares of common stock of the
          Corporation on such date, by their written consent dated on August
          13, 2001.

     In witness hereof, the undersigned have signed this Amendment to the
Articles of Incorporation of Quazon Corp. this 14th day of August 2001.

     /s/ Todd B. Crosland               /s/ Jana K. Meyer
     ---------------------------------  ---------------------------------
     Todd B. Crosland, President        Jana K. Meyer, Secretary


STATE OF UTAH             )
                          : ss
COUNTY OF SALT LAKE       )



     On this 14th day of August, 2001, personally appeared before me, the
undersigned, a notary public, Todd B. Crosland and Jana K. Meyer, who being by
me first duly sworn, declared that they are the president and secretary,
respectively, of the above-named Corporation, acknowledged that they signed
the foregoing Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation, and verified that
the statements contained therein are true.


WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL.


                                             (SEAL)

/s/ Tally A. Burke  NOTARY PUBLIC
June 15, 200        Commission Expiration
EXHIBIT 31.1 

CERTIFICATION

I, Alan Lindsay, Chief Executive Officer of MIV Therapeutics, Inc., certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this amendment to the quarterly report of MIV Therapeutics, Inc.; 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.     The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b)     Omitted;

(c)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.     The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 130 (Thursday, July 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 41671]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-17076]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION


Federal Travel Regulation; National Travel Conference 2000

AGENCY: Office of Governmentwide Policy, GSA.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The General Services Administration (GSA) is announcing that 
significant changes to the Federal Travel Regulation will be discussed 
at a national travel conference to be held in Orlando, Florida, October 
30 through November 1, 2000. Additionally, Travel Managers of the Year 
Awards will be presented by Government Executive magazine. Federal 
agencies may hold agency-wide meetings at this conference.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jane Groat, Office of Governmentwide 
Policy, Travel Management Policy Division, at (202) 501-4318, or by e-
mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fc969d9299d29b8e939d88bc9b8f9dd29b938a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="513b303f347f36233e3025113622307f363e27">[email protected]</span></a> or at www.nationaltravel2000.com.

    Dated: June 30, 2000.
William T. Rivers,
Acting Director, Travel Management Policy Division.
[FR Doc. 00-17076 Filed 7-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-34-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
280P15

#### In re Foreclosure of Real Property Under Deed of Trust from Michael D. Gutowski and Mary Anne Gutowski, in the Original Amount of $286,000, Dated November 9, 2006 and Recorded on November 15, 2006 in Book 4367 at Page 502, Union County Registry; Trustee Services of Carolina, LLC, Substitute Trustee

1. Respondents’ Notice of Appeal Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA14-881)

1.

2. Respondents’ *Pro Se*PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

2.

3. Respondents’ *Pro Se*Motion for Stay of Foreclosure Sale

3. Denied 08/25/2015

4. Respondents’ *Pro Se*Motion to Enjoin All Other State Actions

4.

5. Petitioner’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal

5.

6. Respondents’ *Pro Se*Motion for Stay in Light of Bankruptcy Filing

6.
### ••Arn'KiEM ! O r ^\SPORTAl!0! ^ ••E;oPERAno: ' .•EBP 1 :-

^ ! ^ .1.. - 

## U 8 Allyso n Knox

Partner s i n Learnin g Manage r 540 4 Wisconsi n Avenu e Suit e 80 0 Chev yChas e IVI D 2081 5

U.S
. Dept . o fTransportatio n DodcetNQ.fAA-J2012-QQ8SL
_ 120 0 Ne wJerse yAve.S E Wes t Buildin g Gran d Floo r Room-12014 0 Washingto n DC 2059 0 February21 , 201 2 T o Who m I t Ma yConcern : I wor k fo rMicrosof tCorporatio n as a Partner s i n Learnin g Manager . I liv e i n Washingto n DC
. I hav e travelle d wit h Su n CountryAirline s fro m Washingto n D C t o Lansing , an d agai n wit h Su n Countr yas i ttravelle d fro m Lansin g t o Washingto n DC
. I hav e travelle d a tleas tte n time s wit h thi s rout e an d I find tha ti ti s critica l fo rth e busines s 1 d o wit h th e Stat e o fMichigan . I foun d th e airline' s accommodation s t o b e withou tfault , an d I hop e yo u d o no t depriv e Su n Countryo fit s plac e o n th e Reaga n Nationa l Airpor trunways . I ti s quit e a n advantag e fo r resident s o fWashingto n DC , Reaga n Nationa l Airport , t o b e abl e t o trave l fro m Washingto n D C t o Lansin g Airport . W e hop e yo u rul e i n favo ro fSu n Country' s reques tt o maintai n it s presen tspo ta t Washingto n ReaRan . Than k you , 

# •C- K Allyso n AKncS

T Partner s i n Learnin g Manage r Microsof tCorporatio n
## State ofCalifornia Office ofAdministrative Law In re: Air ResourcesBoard Regulatory Action: Title 13, California Code of Regulations Adopt sections: 2477.1, 2477.2, 2477.3,· 2477.4, 2477.5, 2477.6, 2477.7, 2477.8, 2477.9, 2477.10,2477.11,2477.12, 2477.13, 2477.14, 2477.15, 2477.16, 2477.1'7, 2477.18, 2477.19,2477.20,2477.21 Amend sections: 2477 Repeal sections: 

# . NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF REGULATORY ACTION
GovernmentCode Section 11349.3 OAL File No. 2012-0831-01 S

The AirResources Board proposed to amend section 2477 oftitle 13 ofthe California Code of Regulations, Airborne Toxic Control Measurefor In-Use Diesel-Fueled Transport Refrigeration Units (TRU) and TRU Generator Sets, and Facilities Where TRU's Operate, to provide a one year extension from the Ultra-Low Emission TRU (ULETRU) in-use performance standards for model year2001 through 2003 TRU Enginesthat complied with applicable Low Emission TRU (LETRU) in-use performance standardswithin the required time periods. The proposed amendmentswould also clarify manual recordkeeping requirements, require automated electronictracking systems, establish requirements for businesses that arrange, hire, contract, ordispatch the transport ofgoods in TRU-equipped trucks, trailers orcontainers, and clarify issues identified during the implementation ofthe regulation. OAL approves this regulatory action pursuantto section 11349.3 ofthe Government Code. This regulatory action becomes effective on 10/15/201 Date: 10/15/2012
Original: James Goldstene Copy: 

## Amy. Whiting -.

**--~.-,.,** For: DEBRA M. CORNEZ Director
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 24, 2022

No. 04-21-00579-CR

EX PARTE ERIC URIEL SIFUENTES, et al,

From the 63rd Judicial District Court, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 5135

Roland Andrade, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

On December 22, 2021, appellants filed a notice of appeal of the denial of their pretrial 

habeas applications and an opposed emergency motion for immediate release under Texas Code 

of Criminal Procedure article 17.151. 

On January 24, 2022, we issued our opinion in this case which, essentially, granted the 

relief requested in the emergency motion. We therefore deny the emergency motion as moot.

It is so ORDERED January 24, 2022.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT
EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Greater Atlantic Financial
Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David E. Ritter Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

A.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

B.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     as of and for the period covered by the Report.





                                         By: /s/ David E. Ritter
                                         -----------------------
                                         David E. Ritter
                                         Senior Vice President and
                                         Chief Financial Officer


                                         Date: August 12, 2004
163P16

#### State v. Arkeem Hakim Jordan

Def’s *Pro Se*Motion for Writ of Error

Dismissed

Ervin, J.,

recused
544 S.E.2d 883

#### Carol Bowyer JOHNSON, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia, Appellee.

Record No. 1354-00-3.

Court of Appeals of Virginia.

April 17, 2001.

Before FITZPATRICK, C.J., and BENTON, WILLIS, ELDER, BRAY, ANNUNZIATA, BUMGARDNER, FRANK, HUMPHREYS, CLEMENTS and AGEE, JJ.

*315UPON A PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

On March 30, 2001 came Carol Bowyer Johnson, by court-appointed counsel, and filed a petition praying that the Court set aside the judgment rendered herein on March 20, 2001, and grant a rehearing *en banc*thereof.

On consideration whereof, the petition for rehearing *en banc*is granted, the mandate entered herein on March 20, 2001 is stayed pending the decision of the Court *en banc,*and the appeal is reinstated on the docket of this Court.

The parties shall file briefs in compliance with Rule 5A:35. The appellant shall attach as an addendum to the opening brief upon rehearing *en banc*a copy of the opinion previously rendered by the Court in this matter. It is further ordered that the appellant shall file with the clerk of this Court twelve additional copies of the appendix previously filed in this case.
YOEL JOSE BUSTO-RAMOS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-643

_____________________________/

Opinion filed January 5, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

David P. Kreider, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Zachary F. Lawton, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, BENTON, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
No. 11-5438.

#### Fincher *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 10.26
 
  Amendment Company BCP BCL Bain KKR Vornado Advisors Agreement
 1.
    
    Definition of Quarterly Fee Amount. The definition of Quarterly Fee Amount is
hereby amended and restated as follows:
 Quarterly Fee Amount shall mean (a) $3,750,000 per fiscal quarter for the
Companys fiscal year 2005; and (b) for each fiscal year thereafter during the Term, an
amount per fiscal quarter equal to one hundred five percent (105%) of the applicable
Quarterly Fee Amount for the immediately preceding fiscal year; provided that, for
fiscal year 2009 the Company shall only pay $3,750,000 per fiscal quarter and the
aggregate difference between each such payment and the amount that would be paid in
accordance with sub-section (b) above (such aggregate amount, the Increase Amount)
shall be paid by the Company, if at all, at the time the Company successfully completes
an Initial Public Offering from the proceeds of such offering. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, the Quarterly Fee Amount for the fiscal quarter of 2006 (i.e., the quarter
commencing on or about February 1, 2006) shall be $7,500,000.
 2.
    
    Continuing Force and Effect. The Agreement, as modified by the terms of this
Amendment, shall continue in full force and effect from and after the date of the adoption of
this Amendment set forth above.3.
    
    Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed by the parties hereto in any number of
separate counterparts (including facsimiled counterparts), each of which shall be deemed to be
an original, and all of which taken together shall be deemed to constitute one and the same
instrument.4.
    
    GOVERNING LAW. THIS AMENDMENT AND SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED AND
INTERPRETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.




---



##### 



TOYS R US, INC.By:
    /s/ David J. SchwartzName:
    David J. SchwartzTitle:BAIN CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLCBy:
    /s/ Matthew S. LevinName:
    Matthew S. LevinIts:BAIN CAPITAL, LTD.By:
    /s/ Matthew S. LevinName:
    Matthew S. LevinIts:KOHLBERG KRAVIS ROBERTS & CO., L.P.
By: KKR & Co. LLCBy:
    /s/ Michael M. CalbertName:
    Michael M. CalbertIts:VORNADO TRUCK, LLCBy:
    Vornado Realty L.P.Its:
    Sole MemberBy:
    Vornado Realty TrustIts:
    General PartnerBy:
    /s/ Michael D. FascitelliName:
    Michael D. FascitelliIts:
Extension of Employment Agreement dated 12/1406 for Robert E. White, Jr.


    Exhibit
      10.14(b)

    


    EXTENSION
      OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

    


    


    


    Robert
      E. White, Jr. (“Employee”) and FPIC Insurance Group, Inc. (“Employer”) are
      parties to an Employment Agreement dated as of November 1, 2002 (the “Employment
      Agreement”). The Employment Agreement provides for employment for a term
      beginning November 1, 2002 and ending December 31, 2004 by Employee and further
      provides that the term of Employee’s employment thereunder may be extended for
      additional one-year terms prior to the end of each calendar year. The term
      of
      Employee’s employment under the Employment Agreement has been so extended and
      currently continues through December 31, 2007.

    


    Pursuant
      to Section 1(a) of the Employment Agreement, Employer, acting through its
      President and Chief Executive Officer, hereby notifies Employee that the term
      of
      Employee’s employment under the Employment Agreement has been extended for one
      additional year, and, therefore, the term of Employee’s employment under the
      Employment Agreement shall continue through December 31, 2008. Furthermore,
      Employer hereby notifies Employee that Employee’s annual salary provided for in
      Section 2(a) of the Employment Agreement shall be $420,000 for
      2007.

    


    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, this Extension of Employment Agreement has been executed this
      14th
      day of December 2006.

    


    


    
      	 	 	 
	Accepted:	FPIC
              INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
	
              
 

               

            	 
 	 
 
	/s/
              Robert E. White, Jr.	By  	/s/ John
              R. Byers
	
              

              Robert E. White, Jr.	
              
                

                John R. Byers

              President and Chief Executive Officer
No. 11-5494.

#### Potter *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
§ 73.4190 Political candidate authorization notice and sponsorship identification. ( a ) See Joint Public Notice by the Federal Communications Commission and the Federal Election Commission, FCC 78-419, dated June 19, 1978. 69 FCC 2d 1129; 43 FR 30126, July 13, 1978.
( b ) See Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 92-55, adopted February 12, 1992. 7 FCC Rcd 1616.
[44 FR 36389, June 22, 1979, as amended at 59 FR 52087, Oct. 14, 1994]
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. John BECK, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 02-3902.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 16, 2004.

Gary D. Arbeznik, Asst. U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Cleveland, OH, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Gary H. Levine, Cleveland, OH, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before MERRITT and DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges; and HOOD, District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable Joseph M. Hood, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation.

ORDER

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.
No. 11-9888.

#### Schaff *v.*United States.

C. A. llth Cir. Certiorari denied.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with this Quarterly Report of HIV-VAC Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the year period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin Murray, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the
         period ending June 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material
         respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HIV-VAC
         Inc.

Date: September 30, 2011

/s/ Kevin Murray
Kevin Murray
Chief Executive Officer
#### § 64.6070 Taxes and fees.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 77365, Sept. 20, 2024.

No Provider shall charge any taxes or fees to users of Inmate Calling Services for, or in connection with, interstate or international calls, other than those permitted under § 64.6020, and those defined as Mandatory Taxes, Mandatory Fees, or Authorized Fees.

[85 FR 67462, Oct. 23, 2020]
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report MIV Therapeutics, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended August 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Alan P.
Lindsay, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.



/s/ Alan P. Lindsay
----------------------------
Alan P. Lindsay
CEO and Chairman
October 14, 2006
No. 11-9691.

#### Smith *v.*Dybing et al.

Sup. Ct. Va. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin*v. *District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U. S. 1 (1992) *(per curiam).*