alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 By The Chief Financial Officer,

As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002.

I, F. Clay
Creasey, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of Toys R Us, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended January 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ F. Clay Creasey, Jr.                                               
|F. Clay Creasey, Jr. Executive Vice President - Chief Financial Officer
|(Principal Financial Officer)                                          
|March 24, 2010
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

__________________________

PATRICIA W. DANIEL , Petitioner,

v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTEC TION BOARD , Respondent.

__________________________ 201 3-3 040

__________________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. AT0752110374 -I- 2.

__________________________ ON MOTION

__________________________
O R D E R The Department of the Army moves without oppos ition to re form the official caption to design ate the Merit Systems Prote c tion Boar d (“Board”) as the respondent. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is designated as the respondent when the Board's decision concerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. In this case, the Board dismis sed the appeal for lack of Case: 13-3040 Document: 11 Page: 1 Filed: 04/24/2013PATRICIA DANIEL V

. MSPB 2

jurisdiction. Thus, the Board is the proper respondent in this petition for review. Upon consideration thereof,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT : (1) The Department of the Army ’s motion to reform the caption is granted. The revised offici al caption is

re flected above

. (2) The respondent should calculate its brief due date from the date of filing of this order.

F OR T HE C OURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

s21 Case: 13-3040 Document: 11 Page: 2 Filed: 04/24/2013
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 845/2005

of 2 June 2005         

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar to certain third countries for the 27th partial invitation to tender issued within the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1) and in particular the second indent of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 27th partial invitation to tender for white sugar issued pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 the maximum amount of the export refund shall be 39,760 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 3 June 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 2 June 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

(2)OJ L 246, 20.7.2004, p. 23. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1685/2004 (OJ L 303, 30.9.2004, p. 21).

----
46431.

#### COX v. THE STATE.

(377 SE2d 861)

Weltner, Justice.

Donald Hugh Cox was found guilty by a jury of murdering his sister by stabbing her with a knife. He was sentenced to life imprisonment.

The evidence in this case discloses that Cox, then fifteen-and-a-half years old, fatally stabbed his sister while she slept. There is no evidence of any occurrence prior to the homicide that could have resulted in serious provocation to Cox. Indeed, the sister’s last words, after she was stabbed were: “Donnie, Donnie, I love you.”

1. From the evidence contained in the record in this case, a rational trier of fact could have found Cox guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of murder. *Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).

2. Cox complains that the trial court erred in refusing to grant his motion for continuance. The record discloses that Cox made such a motion at the beginning of his trial, the ground being that an appeal from a juvenile matter in which he was concerned was pending in the Court of Appeals. While he claimed irreparable harm if his motion were not granted, no explanation was made in the trial court (nor in this court) how the pendency of that appeal could affect the trial of the murder indictment. There was no error.

3. Cox complains the trial court erred in refusing to grant his motion for a change of venue. There is nothing in the record to suggest that pre-trial publicity had prejudiced the jurors to the extent that they could not give Cox a fair trial. See *Chancey v. State,*256 Ga. 415, 429-430 (349 SE2d 717) (1986). There was no error.

4. The trial court found that the statement Cox made to police following his arrest was made after he had been advised of his *Miranda*rights, and that it was given freely and voluntarily. There was no evidence to the contrary. It was not error to admit the statement. See *Worthy v. State,*253 Ga. 661, 663-664 (324 SE2d 431) (1985).

5. The evidence points to no act on the part of Cox’s sister that could have generated a “sudden, violent, and irresistible passion resulting from serious provocation sufficient to excite passion in a rea*153sonable person.” OCGA § 16-5-2. Accordingly, it was not error for the trial court to decline to instruct the jury on voluntary manslaughter. See *Ross v. State,*255 Ga. 1, 5 (334 SE2d 300) (1985).

Decided April 6, 1989.

*Murray & Nabors, Edward T. Murray,*for appellant.

*William A. Foster III, District Attorney, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, Andrew S. Ree,*for appellee.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4574

To amend part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act to

provide that the requirement regarding the continued educational placement of children with disabilities in public schools during the pendency

of certain proceedings shall not apply with respect to disciplinary proceedings against those children for possession of firearms or other deadly

weapons or assault with deadly weapons.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 13, 1994

Mr. STEARNS (for himself, Mr. KLUG, Mr. CANADY, Mr. LEWIS of Florida,

and Mrs. FOWLER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Education and Labor

A BILL

To amend part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act to provide that the requirement regarding

the continued educational placement of children with disabilities in public schools during the pendency of certain

proceedings shall not apply with respect to disciplinary

proceedings against those children for possession of firearms or other deadly weapons or assault with deadly

weapons.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4574 IH

1 SECTION 1. INAPPLICABILITY OF REQUIREMENT REGARD2 ING CONTINUED EDUCATIONAL PLACEMENT

3 OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES DURING

4 DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS FOR POSSES5 SION OF FIREARMS OR OTHER DEADLY

6 WEAPONS OR ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAP7 ONS.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (3) of section 615(e)

9 of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20

10 U.S.C. 1415(e)(3)) is amended—

11 (1) by inserting ‘‘(A)’’ after the paragraph des12 ignation;

13 (2) in subparagraph (A) (as so redesignated),

14 by striking ‘‘During’’ and inserting ‘‘Except as pro15 vided in subparagraph (B), during’’; and

16 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub17 paragraph:

18 ‘‘(B)(i) The requirement contained in subparagraph

19 (A) regarding the maintenance of a child with a disability

20 in the current educational placement of such child shall

21 not apply with respect to a disciplinary proceeding against

22 such child for possession of a firearm or other deadly

23 weapon or assault with a deadly weapon.

24 ‘‘(ii) For purposes of this subparagraph, the terms

25 ‘deadly weapon’ and ‘assault with a deadly weapon’ shall

26 have the meanings given such terms by the State edu-
3

•HR 4574 IH

1 cational agency, or at the option of the State educational

2 agency, the local educational agency, except that the term

3 ‘assault with a deadly weapon’ shall include assaults with

4 items not generally considered to be deadly weapons if

5 such items are used in a manner which is intended to

6 cause potentially life-threatening injuries.’’.

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

8 subsection (a) apply with respect to a disciplinary proceed9 ing commenced on or after the date of the enactment of

10 this Act.

Æ
#### Ross R. Mattis, Trustee, et al., appellees, v. John Connolly et al., appellees, Impleaded with G. M. Steckman et al., appellants.

Filed June 22, 1895.

*No.*6442.

.Bill of Exceptions: Allowance by Clerk: Review. In this case there are discussed only questions of fact, and as the bill of exceptions was settled by the clerk of the district court without any agreement upon it, these questions cannot be considered.

Appeal from the district court of Pawnee county. Heard below before Bush, J.

*H. C. Lindsay, Humphrey & Raper,*and *Story & Story,*for appellants.

*629*W. W. Giffen, G. E. Becker,*and *J. J. Baker, contra.*

Ryan, C.

In this case the bill of exceptions was signed by the clerk upon a stipulation that he should settle and allow it. There was, however, no agreement upon the bill of exceptions, and following *Scott v. Spencer,*42 Neb., 637, we cannot treat it as such. We find that the briefs of counsel, upon which, without oral argument, this cause was submitted, discuss only questions of fact. These we cannot advisedly consider, and the judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.
§ 3.75 Licensee's failure to make timely payment. Failure to remit proper and timely payment to the Commission or to an accounting authority may result in one or more of the following actions against the licensee: ( a ) Forfeiture or other authorized sanction.
( b ) The refusal by foreign countries to accept or refer public correspondence communications to or from the vessel or vessels owned, operated or licensed by the person or entity failing to make payment. This action may be taken at the request of the Commission or independently by the foreign country or coast station involved.
( c ) Further action to recover amounts owed utilizing any or all legally available debt collection procedures.
#### § 10.420 Message elements.

A WEA Alert Message processed by a Participating CMS Provider shall include five mandatory CAP elements—Event Type; Area Affected; Recommended Action; Expiration Time (with time zone); and Sending Agency. This requirement does not apply to National Alerts.

[86 FR 46790, Aug. 20, 2021]
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority (the Authority), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, on the date hereof:

(a) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Authority for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 filed on the date hereof with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Authority.



| |  |                                                         
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/    MITCHELL GROSSINGER
ETESS                        
| |  | Mitchell Grossinger Etess                               
| |  | Chief Executive Officer, Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority
| |  | December 21, 2007                                       

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Authority and will be retained by the Authority and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
- Your Team. Your Workspace.
Applying for a funding opportunity is easier and more efficient when your team collaborates. Grants.gov Workspace makes it possible.
- Apply for a Grant Using Workspace 
 Informative status
**Reminder:** Federal agencies do not publish personal financial assistance opportunities on Grants.gov. Federal funding opportunities published on Grants.gov are for organizations and entities supporting the development and management of government-funded programs and projects. For more information about personal financial assistance benefits, please visit USA.gov.
 - How to Apply for Federal Funding Opportunities
Key steps that will help you in the application process
Learn more
- Are You Eligible for Federal Funding Opportunities?
Determining your eligibility for federal grants is an important first step in the application process.
Learn more
- Ways to Get Help When Using Grants.gov
Grants.gov offers a wide range of help-focused resources
Learn more
- Grant Writing Tips
Principles and examples of grant-writing
Learn more
- **Learning Workspace - Application Workflow for Organizations**"How To..." Blog Series
How to manage passwords, find grantor contact information, find an applicant's UEI, and more
 Learn more
- **Intro to Grants.gov - Applying for a Federal Grant on Grants.gov**Grants Learning Center
The Grants Learning Center is your gateway to the federal grants world
 Learn more
- Next System Maintenance: October 19-21, 2024
Software releases bring users new features and fixes
Learn more
Return to topConnect with Us- Blog
- Twitter
- YouTube
- Alerts
- RSS
- XML Extract
- Get Adobe Reader
Health & Human Services- HHS.gov
- EEOC / No Fear Act
- Accessibility
- Privacy
- Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
- Disclaimers
- Site Map
Community- USA.gov
- WhiteHouse.gov
- USAspending.gov
- SBA.gov
- SAM.gov
- Report Fraud
Additional Help- Chat now with Grant
- Frequently Asked Questions
 Your session will expire in 3 minutes. 
 To continue working, click on the "OK" button below. Note: This is being done to protect your privacy. Unsaved changes will be lost. 
-  Ok 
Open default modal
No. 11-5713.

#### Bolden *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Exhibit 99.1      Press Release











PRESS RELEASE
November 30, 2001                  For further information contact:
                                   David M. Bradley
                                   Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
                                   North Central Bancshares, Inc.
                                   825 Central Avenue
                                   Fort Dodge, Iowa 50501
                                   515-576-7531


                NORTH CENTRAL BANCSHARES, INC. DECLARES DIVIDEND

David M. Bradley, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of North
Central Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") announced today that the Company
declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.15 per share on the Company's
common stock for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2001. The dividend will
be payable to all stockholders of record as of December 17, 2001 and will be
paid on January 7, 2002.

On September 20, 2001, the Company commenced a new stock repurchase program for
100,000 shares, of which 40,000 shares remain to be repurchased. The Company has
1,729,580 shares of common stock currently outstanding.

North Central Bancshares, Inc. serves north central and southeastern Iowa at 8
full service locations in Fort Dodge, Nevada, Ames, Burlington, Mount Pleasant
and Perry, Iowa through its wholly-owned subsidiary, First Federal Savings Bank
of Iowa, headquartered in Fort Dodge, Iowa. The Bank's deposits are insured by
the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The Company's stock is traded on The
Nasdaq National Market under the symbol "FFFD".
#### § 27.902 Permissible communications.

Licensees in the 1670-1675 MHz band are authorized to provide fixed or mobile service, except aeronautical mobile service, subject to the technical requirements of this subpart.
§ 27.1212 License term. ( a ) BRS/EBS licenses shall be issued for a period of 10 years beginning with the date of grant.
( b ) An initial BTA authorization shall be issued for a period of ten years from the date the Commission declared bidding closed in the MDS auction.
You too. 

From: "Lee, Amanda I." <Amanda_I._Lee@omb.eop.gov>

To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Beth Hassett-Sipple/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Eloise Shepherd/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Joseph-J 

Dougherty/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 12/07/2012 11:56 AM

Subject: RE: Call-in number for Monday and Tuesday PM NAAQS meetings

Great! I’ll send the number out. Thanks and have a good weekend!

From: Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 11:50 AM

To: Lee, Amanda I.

Cc: Hassett-Sipple.Beth@epamail.epa.gov; Shepherd.Eloise@epamail.epa.gov; Dougherty.JosephJ@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: RE: Call-in number for Monday and Tuesday PM NAAQS meetings

We should have lots of lines--it's a system that allows many people to call in. We used this number when 

we met to discuss the proposal in June and had no problems at that time. 

"Lee, Amanda I." ---12/07/2012 10:51:29 AM---Thanks Lydia. That my one of my things to do today. 

How many lines do we have? Thanks! From: Wegm

From: "Lee, Amanda I." <Amanda_I._Lee@omb.eop.gov>

To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Joseph-J Dougherty/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Beth Hassett-Sipple/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Eloise 

Shepherd/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 12/07/2012 10:51 AM

Subject: RE: Call-in number for Monday and Tuesday PM NAAQS meetings

Thanks Lydia. That my one of my things to do today. How many lines do we have? Thanks!

From: Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 10:45 AM

To: Lee, Amanda I.

Cc: Dougherty.Joseph-J@epamail.epa.gov; Hassett-Sipple.Beth@epamail.epa.gov; 

Shepherd.Eloise@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: Call-in number for Monday and Tuesday PM NAAQS meetings

Amanda,

Since I didn't hear from you about what call-in number to use for the PM NAAQS meetings on Monday 

and Tuesday, I thought I would offer the use of our call-in number. That number is 1-866-299-3188, code 

9195410514#. Please let me know if this plan works for you or if you want to use a different number. If we 

do use this number, I assume you'll be sending it out to the other agencies who will be participating on the 

call. Thanks. 

Lydia
#### § 32.7899 Content of accounts.

Jurisdictional differences and nonregulated income amounts shall be included in Accounts 7910 and 7990.
1 The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 06-2724

___________ Napoleon Hartsfield, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa. Department of Corrections; * Charlie Hourihan, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: November 5, 2007 Filed: November 8, 2007

___________ Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Napoleon Hartsfield appeal s the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment to the remaining defendant in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action following this court’s remand for further proceedings on a retaliation claim. We conclude that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the distri ct court. The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

 34

 36

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/03

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 03 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4740 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4740

To require the Administrator of General Services to convey to the city 
   of Key West, Florida, each of 2 parcels of land of the Naval Air 
 Station Key West in Key West, Florida, at such time as the parcel is 
reported to the Administrator as excess to the needs of the Department 
                              of the Navy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 13, 1994

 Mr. Deutsch introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Government Operations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Administrator of General Services to convey to the city 
   of Key West, Florida, each of 2 parcels of land of the Naval Air 
 Station Key West in Key West, Florida, at such time as the parcel is 
reported to the Administrator as excess to the needs of the Department 
                              of the Navy.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF LAND TO THE CITY OF KEY WEST, FLORIDA.

    (a) Requirement.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
Administrator of General Services shall convey to the city of Key West, 
Florida, each of the parcels of real property described in subsection 
(c), at such time as the parcel is reported to the General Services 
Administration as excess to the needs of the Department of the Navy.
    (b) Terms.--A conveyance of property under this section shall be by 
quitclaim deed, without monetary consideration, and subject to such 
other terms and conditions as the Administrator determines to be 
appropriate.
    (c) Property Described.--The real property referred to in 
subsection (a) consists of 2 separate parcels in Key West, Florida, as 
follows:
            (1) Approximately 1.82 acres of land and improvements 
        located on Simonton Street and known as the Simonton Street 
        Commissary Store of the Naval Air Station Key West.
            (2) Approximately 36.16 acres of land and improvements 
        known as the Poinciana Housing of the Naval Air Station Key 
        West.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered November 20 , 2017

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 17

- 01221

- CV

THE UNIVERSITY OF TE XAS SOUTHWESTERN MED ICAL CENTER, Appellant

V.

CHARLES WAYNE TAYLOR AND ROSEMARY TAYLOR, Appellee s

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 16

- 08022



### O RDER

Before the court is appellant’s November 15, 2017 unopposed motion to extend time to

file appellant’s brief in t his accelerated appeal

. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s

brief filed on or before December 15, 2017.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART

JUSTICE