alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to 10 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 1350 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the Quarterly Report of
Electronic Game Card, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report") for electronic Game Card, Inc., (the "Company"), the undersigned
hereby certifies that:

1)    to the best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and

2)    to the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      result of operations of the Company.


August 10, 2006



/S/ LEE COLE
--------------------------------
    LEE COLE
    ACTING PRESIDENT AND ACTING
    CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009
of Zap.Com Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for the periods presented
in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
    /s/ Philip A. Falcone

Philip A. Falcone
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
#### § 80.868 Card of instructions.

A card of instructions giving a clear summary of the radiotelephone distress procedure must be securely mounted and displayed in full view of the principal operating position.
<PAGE>
                                  Exhibit 99.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

          I, Mark Szporka, CFO, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of PainCare Holdings,
     Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
     information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
     subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
     particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
     prepared;

b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
     annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)   presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
     the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
     Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
     committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
     equivalent function):

a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
     registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     controls; and

6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
     annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
     controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
     controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including
     any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
     weaknesses.

        Date:  March 19, 2003


        /s/ Mark Szporka
        -------------------------------------
        Mark Szporka, Chief Financial Officer
No. 11-9144.

#### Belcher *v.*Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
### 26561

PROGRES S POLRE P I

. HEADIN G RLEfLA N Date : 12/16/199 0 — — XCltff t From : Stev e Hawthorn , OS C Regio n VII I Z-&

T T o : Steve n Luftwig , Directo r ER D Subject : Midval e Sla g (NPL ) - Abandone d La b Pol rep : POLRE P 3 I I

. BACKGROUN D Site No : 7 1 D.O , No : 5 7 Respons e Authority : CERCL A N P L Statue : Propose d NP L Star t Date : 12/12/199 0 Approva l Statue : Directo r Hasardou s Waste Managemen t Divisio n Statu e o f Actio n Memorandum : Bein g Drafte d III

. RESPONS E INFORMATIO N A

. Situatio n T h e Midva] e Sla g NP L Sit e (proposed ) locate d approximatel

y 60 0 east , 770 0 South , Midval e Utah , consist s primaril y o f abou t tw o millio n tons o f sla g remainin g fro m a century' s wort h o f coppe r an d lea d smelting i n th e area , an d i s locate d Jus t nort h o f th e Sharo n Stee l NP L sitfc

. Th e waste s foun d o n th e sit e ar e contaminate d i n par t wit h hig h concentration s

o f lea d an d arsenic

. A n analytica l laboratory wa s observe d o n th e sit e containin g hazardou s chemical s an d a removal actio n wa s initiated

. Flammabl e liquids , oxidizers , acids , bases , cyanides , low

- leve l radioactiv e compounds , compresse d gas cylinders , an d a suspecte d P C B transforme r hav e bee n foun d o n th e site

. Initia l estimate s indicate d approximatel

y 250 0 container s o f variou s size s o n site

. Col d an d snow y condition s continu e a t th e sit e causin g weathe r relate d sligh t delays

. B

. Action s Take n T h e chemica l inventory an d stagin g wa s complete d in th e La b building

. Approximatel

y 60 0 container s hav e been inventorie d an d stage d in th e La b building

. Hazar d categorizatio n

o f unknown chemicAl e wa s complete d in th e La b building

. Inventoryin

g o f container s began in th e Gat e building

. Approximatel

y 2 4 Ibs

. o f clas s A explosive s wer e foun d in th e tw o buildings

. Thee e explosiv e material s wer e removed an d place d in a saf e storag e area . Approximatel

y seven container s o f low

- leve l radioactiv e materia l wer e als o foun d i n th e Gat e building

.

### C

.

Nex t Step s 

### T h e assessmen t continue s wit h th e segregation , inventoryin

g an d stagin g o f th e la b contents

. Bsgi n hazar d categorizatio n 

### segregatio n an d stagin g o f compound s in th e th e Gat e building

. 0

. Ke y Issue s 

### Non e t o repor t I V , COS T INFORMATIO N 

### ERG S T A T E P A 

### Amoun t Budgete d $ 75,00 0 50,00 0 25,00 0 

### Cost

s t o Dat e 36,00 0 10,00 0 6,00 0

M A M A t \ 

### Balanc e 34,00 0 40,00 0 19,00 0 f t 3

. 00 0 TOTA L 150,00 0
No. 11-8969.

#### DeSan *v.*Pennsylvania et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
795 A.2d 850

#### IN THE MATTER OF CRAIG N. GREENAWALT, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 021481980).

April 29, 2002.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 01-166, concluding that CRAIG N. GREENAWALT, formerly of WESTFIELD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1980, and who was temporarily suspended from the practice of law by Order of the Court filed October 25, 1999, and who remains suspended at this time, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period one year for violating *RPC*1.1(a)and (b)(gross neglect and pattern of neglect), *RPC*1.3(lack of diligence), *RPC*1.4(a)(failure to communicate), *RPC*1.15(b)(failure to timely remit trust funds to a client or third party), *RPC*1.16(d) (abandonment of clients), *RPC*3.4(c)(knowingly disobeying an obligation under the rules of a tribunal), *RPC*8.1(b)(failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and *RPC*8.4(d)(conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice);

And the Disciplinary Review Board having determined that respondent should remain suspended until respondent cooperates fully with the Office of Attorney Ethics in the *Molloy*matter and that certain other conditions should be placed on his reinstatement to practice and thereafter on his practice of law;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that CRAIG N. GREENAWALT is suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year, and until the further Order of the Court, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that no petition for reinstatement to practice be considered until respondent has cooperated fully with the Office of Attorney Ethics in the *Molloy*matter; and it is further

*473ORDERED that prior to reinstatement to practice, respondent shall complete ten hours of courses in professional responsibility offered by the Institute for Continuing Legal Education and shall provide the Office of Attorney Ethics with proof of his satisfactory completion thereof; and it is further

ORDERED that following reinstatement to practice, respondent shall practice law under the supervision of a practicing attorney approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics for a period of two years and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of suspension and that respondent comply with *Rule*1:20-20; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
§ 61.52 Form, size, type, legibility, etc. ( a ) Pages of tariffs must be numbered consecutively and designated as “Original title page,” “Original page 1,” “Original page 2,” etc. ( 1 ) All such pages must show, in the upper left-hand corner the name of the issuing carrier; in the upper right-hand corner the FCC number of the tariff, with the page designation directly below; in the lower left-hand corner the issued date; in the lower right-hand corner the effective date; and at the bottom, center, the street address of the issuing officer. The carrier must also specify the issuing officer's title either at the bottom center of all tariff pages, or on the title page and check sheet only.
( 2 ) As an alternative, the issuing carrier may show in the upper left-hand corner the name of the issuing carrier, the title and street address of the issuing officer, and the issued date; and in the upper right-hand corner the FCC number of the tariff, with the page designation directly below, and the effective date. The carrier must specify the issuing officer's title in the upper left-hand corner of either all tariff pages, or on the title page and check sheet only. A carrier electing to place the information at the top of the page should annotate the bottom of each page to indicate the end of the material, e.g., a line, or the term “Printed in USA,” or “End”.
( 3 ) Only one format may be employed in a tariff publication.
( b ) All issuing carriers shall file all tariff publications and associated documents, such as transmittal letters, requests for special permission, and supporting information, electronically in accordance with the requirements set forth in §§ 61.13 through 61.17.
[49 FR 40869, Oct. 18, 1984, as amended at 58 FR 44906, Aug. 25, 1993; 62 FR 5778, Feb. 7, 1997; 63 FR 35541, June 30, 1998; 76 FR 43215, July 20, 2011]
§ 73.1745 Unauthorized operation. ( a ) No broadcast station shall operate at times, or with modes or power, other than those specified and made a part of the license, unless otherwise provided in this part.
( b ) Any unauthorized departure from an operating schedule which is required to be filed with the FCC in Washington, DC, will be considered as a violation of a material term of the license.
[43 FR 45850, Oct. 4, 1978]
No. 11-5112.

#### Emanuel *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-10211.

#### Willis *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 21

AAF-McQuay Inc.  Subsidiaries and Affiliates

AMG
Holdings B.V. (The Netherlands)
AMG Holdings N.V. (The Netherlands) AAF-McQuay Group Inc. (Delaware) AAF-McQuay Inc. (Delaware)
AAF-McQuay Holdings Inc. (Texas)
AAF-McQuay International Inc. (Delaware)
AAF-McQuay Export Inc. (Barbados)
AAF-McQuay Canada Inc. (Canada)
AAF-McQuay Real Property Inc. (Delaware)
American Air Filter Company, Inc. (Delaware)
McQuay-Perfex Export Co. (Minnesota)
McQuay-TPC Corp. (Delaware)
AAF-McQuay Netherlands B.V. (The Netherlands)
AAF-International B.V. (The Netherlands)
AAF Luftreinigungssysteme Gesellschaft m.b.H (Austria)
AAF-SA (Belgium)
AAF-SA (France)
AAF-McQuay Holding France (France)
AAF-McQuay France (France)
AAF-Lufttechnik GmbH (Germany)
Beth Lufttechnik GmbH (Germany)
AAF Environmental Control E.P.E. (Greece)
AAF S.r.l. (Italy)
AAF Italia S.r.l., f/k/a McQuay Europa S.r.l. (Italy)
McQuay Italia S.p.A. (Italy)
AAF, S.A. (Spain)
AAF McQuay UK Limited (United Kingdom)
AAF-Limited (United Kingdom)
AAF-McQuay S.A. de C.V. (Mexico)
McQuay (UK) Limited (United Kingdom)
Air Filters Limited (United Kingdom)
J & E Hall Limited (United Kingdom)
Coulstock & Place Engineering Co. Limited (United Kingdom)
Balmsound Limited (United Kingdom)
AAF Hava Filtreleri ve Ticaret A.S. (Turkey)
AAF, S. de R.L. de C.V. (Mexico)
Purificacion de Aire Venezolana, C.A. (Venezuela)
American Air Filter Brasil Ltda.(Brazil)
McQuayAr Condicionado Brasil Ltda (Brazil)
McQuay Latin America, L.C. (Florida)
McQuay de Venezuela C.A. (Venezuela)
McQuay España S.A. (Spain)
* AAF-McQuay L.L.C. (United Arab EmiratesDubai)
* McQuay Service S.r.l. (Italy)
* McQuay Beirut (Offshore), Inc. S.A.L. (Lebanon)
* McQuay of Georgia LLP (Georgia)
* McQuay Southeast Service, LLC (Georgia)
* McQuay Southeast Supply, LLC (Georgia)
* Applied Control Systems, LLC (Georgia)

---

* McQuay Hellas Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration SA (Greece)
* McQuay Szanyó Klímatechnika Kft. (Hungary)
* AAF Saudi Arabia Limited (Saudi Arabia)
* Kirloskar AAF Ltd. (India)
* Kirloskar-McQuay Pvt. Ltd. (India)
* Equipos McQuay, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico)
* Janitrol de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico)
* Aerofil Filtracion de Aire C.V. (Venezuela)
* McQuay Caribe, Inc. (Puerto Rico)
* American Air Filter Sdn Bhd (Malaysia)
* McQuay Mediterranean LLC (Delaware)

*
indicates joint venture or subsidiary of joint venture

---

QuickLinks
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.1917 Referrals to the Department of Justice and transfer of delinquent debt to the Secretary of Treasury. ( a ) Referrals to the Department of Justice shall be made in accordance with the standards set forth in part 904 of the Federal Claims Collection Standards (31 CFR part 904).
( b ) The DCIA includes separate provisions governing the requirements that the Commission transfer delinquent debts to Treasury for general collection purposes (cross-servicing) in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3711(g)(1) and (2), and notify Treasury of delinquent debts for the purpose of administrative offset in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3716(c)(6). Title 31, U.S.C. 3711(g)(1) requires the Commission to transfer to Treasury all collection activity for a given debt. Under section 3711(g), Treasury will use all appropriate debt collection tools to collect the debt, including referral to a designated debt collection center or private collection agency, and administrative offset. Once a debt has been transferred to Treasury pursuant to the procedures at 31 CFR 285.12, the Commission will cease all collection activity related to that debt.
( c ) All non-tax debts of claims owed to the Commission that have been delinquent for a period of 120 days shall be transferred to the Secretary of the Treasury. Debts which are less than 120 days delinquent may also be referred to the Treasury. Upon such transfer the Secretary of the Treasury shall take appropriate action to collect or terminate collection actions on the debt or claim. A debt is past-due if it has not been paid by the date specified in the Commission's initial written demand for payment or applicable agreement or instrument (including a post-delinquency payment agreement) unless other satisfactory payment arrangements have been made.
[69 FR 27848, May 17, 2004, as amended at 80 FR 43031, July 21, 2015]
#### § 32.3 [Reserved]
No. 11-5390.

#### Nelson *v.*JPMorgan Chase Bank et al.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS OF THE COMPANY AS OF AND FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BE REFERENCED TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         276,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,007,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,401,000
<INVENTORY>                                    669,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,506,000
<PP&E>                                       1,301,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 236,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,818,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,372,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        71,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,931,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,818,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,104,000
<CGS>                                        7,684,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,919,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,225,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             493,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,510,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    41,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,551,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,551,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.84)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.84)
        

</TABLE>
§ 76.613 Interference from a multichannel video programming distributor (MVPD). ( a ) Harmful interference is any emission, radiation or induction which endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services or seriously degrades, obstructs or repeatedly interrupts a radiocommunication service operating in accordance with this chapter.
( b ) An MVPD that causes harmful interference shall promptly take appropriate measures to eliminate the harmful interference.
( c ) If harmful interference to radio communications involving the safety of life and protection of property cannot be promptly eliminated by the application of suitable techniques, operation of the offending MVPD or appropriate elements thereof shall immediately be suspended upon notification by the Regional Director for the Commission's local field office, and shall not be resumed until the interference has been eliminated to the satisfaction of the Regional Director. When authorized by the Regional Director, short test operations may be made during the period of suspended operation to check the efficacy of remedial measures.
( d ) The MVPD may be required by the Regional Director to prepare and submit a report regarding the cause(s) of the interference, corrective measures planned or taken, and the efficacy of the remedial measures.
[42 FR 41296, Aug. 16, 1977, as amended at 62 FR 61031, Nov. 14, 1997; 80 FR 53751, Sept. 8, 2015]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0305 JAMES JOSEPH MAIN, Jr.,

Petitioner and Appellant, v. STATE OF MONTANA,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 19, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 19 2022

09/19/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0305