alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 11-1067.

No. 11-1068.

No. 11-1070.

#### Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. *v.*Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel et al.; Republic of Peru v. Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel et al.; and De Aliaga et al. *v.*Kingdom of Spain

C. A. 11th Cir. Motion of Professional Marine Explorers Society, Inc., et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae*out of time denied. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 657 F. 3d 1159.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

        <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                               6,224
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       30,526
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                         24,005
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   102,455
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     102,455
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              178,151
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        17,407,500
<OTHER-SE>                                         (58,288)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       102,455
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   775,215
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (752,150)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (752,150)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (752,150)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.04)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CHILDTIME
LEARNING CENTERS, INC. FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,704
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,512
<ALLOWANCES>                                       295
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,185
<PP&E>                                          49,190
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,411
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  71,174
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,158
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        27,996
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    71,174
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               128,736
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  121,654
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (275)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 428
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,929
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,329
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,329
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.82


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,133,758
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  795,656
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    355,193
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      45,846,050
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              48,130,657
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  32,602,552
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                48,130,657
<SALES>                                        245,626
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,046,666
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,810,626
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               609,680
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,666,851
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             932,762
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,236,040
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,236,040
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,236,040
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.36


</TABLE>
4200

4000

3000

3800

CALIFORNIA

CA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

ESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS

ESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

S

A

N

DIE

G

O

C

O

IMPERIAL CO

MI P

E

RIA

L

C

O

IMPERIAL CO

Blue

Angels

Peak

In-Ko-Pah

Gorge OE S

In-KoPah Gorge

Jacumba

OE S

Jacumba Coyote

Wells

07

36

08

06

09

36

36

87 91 592 93

97

83 5 85 5 89 5 5

35

5

000m

5

N

84 5 588 000m

584 585 587 5 589

E

5 88

6

5

000 FEET

E 5 93

610

000m 5 5 83 90 91 000 FEET 92

1

6630

32'

000

FEET

30"

770

35'

30"

30"

NS

NS

32'

2'

35'

30"

2'

32°

NR

NR

37'

00'

37'30" 30"

00'

116°

32°

116°

32°30' 32°30'

35

3599

98

05

36

36

36

35

01

97

07

06

08

36

04

36

36

00

36

02

36

03

36

02

36

00

99

98

36

35

36

01

35

36

3604

36

3605

03

5'

3609000mN

1800000

FEET

116°07'30"

116°07'30"

5'

3610

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

CALIFORNIA

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

IN-KO-PAH GORGE OE S, CA-BCN

2012

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

WX Interstate Route /. US Route H State Route

IN-KO-PAH GORGE OE S QUADRANGLE

CALIFORNIA-BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

This map was produced to conform with the

National Geospatial Program US Topo Product Standard, 2011.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.6.1

CONTOUR INTERVAL 40 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0

MILES

1

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

Imagery......................................................NAIP, May 2010

Roads................................................©2006-2011 TomTom

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2011

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2010

Contours.............................National Elevation Dataset, 2006

Boundaries..............Census, IBWC, IBC, USGS, 1972 - 2010

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 11S

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: California Coordinate System of 1983

(zone 6)

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

NS

NR

36 00

11S

×

Ù

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2012 MAGNETIC NORTH

DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 30 ́

9 MILS

11° 48 ́

210 MILS
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            College of Information and Cyberspace
                    National Defense University
                CIC
        Search
                    Search CIC:
                        Search
                Search CIC:
                    Search
    Home

    About 
        Mission & Vision

    Faculty & Staff

    Fact Sheet

    Alumni

    Internships

    FAQ

    Admissions 
        Eligibility Requirements

    Admissions Calendar

    Application Instructions

    Apply Online

    International Students

    Academics 
        Graduate Catalog

    M.S. in Strategic Information and Cyberspace Studies
        
        JPME Master's Degree

    Cyber Workforce Master's Degree (Part Time)

    Leadership Development Programs

    Graduate Certificates

    Academic Partners

    Current Students 
        JPME II  Incoming Students

    LDP Incoming Students

    Student Registration

    Bring Your Own Device

    IA Compliance

    Completion Procedures / Order Transcripts

    Student Services and Resources

    Events
    
        Cyber Beacon

    Cyber PME Colloquium

    Hopper Award

    Lecture Series

    CYBERCOM Symposium

    NEWS

    UC2
    
        About

    Events

    Work With Us

    Center for Cybersecurity
    
        About

    Cybersecurity Center POC

    Cybersecurity Supporting Faculty

    CAE-CDE CISO Certificate Program

    Cybersecurity Trending News

    Cyber Labs
        
        Ethical Hacking

    Critical Infrastructure - SCADA

    Cyber Exercises
        
        Tabletop Exercise

    Cyber Competitions

    Cyber Resources and Awareness

    Stakeholder / Industry Advisory Council

    Contact 
        Contact Us

    Directions

    Access to Ft. McNair

    Map of Ft. McNair  Home
  NEWS
  News & Announcements
 News & Announcements Download
 Details
 Share
 News
 2022 Cyber Beacon Conference Hosted by CIC. By National Defense University, Ft McNair, Washington D.C
 Our 2022 Cyber Beacon will be held on October 6, 2022 starting at 0700 as an in-person event only. All students are invited to attend. We look forward to seeing everyone there and having a great event! **REGISTRATION CAN BE FOUND HERE** **THE AGENDA CAN BE FOUND HERE** **OUR PROMOTIONAL VIDEO CAN BE FOUND HERE**
 SHARE
 PRINT
 National Defense University


College of Information and Cyberspace

300 Fifth Ave., Bldg. 62
Fort Lesley J. McNair
Washington, DC 20319-5066

202-685-6300
                    Stay Connected
                
                
                DOD Privacy & Security
 DOD Links Disclaimer
 DOD Social Media Policy
 DOD Web Policy
 FOIA
 NDU System of Records Notice
 NDU Privacy & Security Notice
 No FEAR Act
 Open GOV
 Plain Writing Act
 Section 508
 Small Business Act
 USA.gov
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Electronic  Game Card, Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the period ending  September  30, 2004, as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, John  Bentley,
President  of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)   the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                     /s/ John R Bentley
                     -------------------------------------
                         John R Bentley
                         President and Chief Executive Officer
                         (Principal Executive Officer)

Date : August 15, 2005

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       24
**EXHIBIT 24.3****POWER OF ATTORNEY**     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Mark A.Kopser and John J. Wellik, and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full powerof substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on hisbehalf, as a director or officer, or both, as the case may be, of United Surgical PartnersInternational, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), the Corporation’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, and to sign any or all amendments to such Form10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith,with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact, and each of themwith or without the others, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thingrequisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposesas he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of saidattorneys-in-fact or its substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtuehereof.              /s/ John C. Garrett, M.D.   John C. Garrett, M.D.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANDREW KWASI DONKOR,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF 

CALIFORNIA, in their official capacity; et 

al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-55829

D.C. No. 2:14-cv-09229-GW-DTB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

George H. Wu, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 14, 2017**

Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

Andrew Kwasi Donkor appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment 

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations in 

connection with the alleged seizure of his automobile and other personal property. 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

FEB 24 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-55829 

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district 

court’s dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) for failure to state a claim. Barren 

v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 1998) (order). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Donkor’s action against defendant 

Manhattan Beach Tow because Donkor failed to allege facts in his second 

amended complaint sufficient to show that Manhattan Beach Tow’s actions 

constituted state action. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)

(explaining that “[a] pleading that offers labels and conclusions” or “naked 

assertions devoid of further factual enhancement” fails to satisfy federal pleading 

standards (citations, internal quotation marks, and alteration omitted)); DeGrassi v. 

City of Glendora, 207 F.3d 636, 647 (9th Cir. 2000) (“[B]are allegation[s]” of 

“joint action will not overcome a motion to dismiss; the plaintiff must allege facts 

tending to show that [defendants] acted under color of state law or authority.” 

(citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).

The district court properly dismissed Donkor’s action against the remaining 

defendants because Donkor failed to allege facts in his second amended complaint 

sufficient to show that Donkor’s constitutional rights were violated pursuant to a 

policy, practice, or custom of a governmental defendant. See Monell v. Dep’t of 
3 16-55829 

Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 690-91 (1978) (setting forth requirements for municipal 

liability); see also Castro v. County of Los Angeles, 833 F.3d 1060, 1075 (9th Cir. 

2016) (en banc) (municipal liability requires “direct causal link between a 

municipal policy or custom and the alleged constitutional deprivation” (citation 

and internal quotation marks omitted)).

AFFIRMED.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 MARCH 27, 2008

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 07-11494

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

BIA No. A98-317-855

JAIME FERNANDO LAFAURIE-CARBONELL, 

Petitioner, 

versus 

U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, 

Respondent. 

________________________

No. 07-11495

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

BIA No. A98-317-856

HENY ALIA PAUWELS-CAMPOS

Petitioner, 
versus 

U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, 

Respondent. 

________________________

No. 07-13425

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

BIA No. A98-317-855

JAIME FERNANDO LAFAURIE-CARBONELL,

Petitioner, 

versus 

U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, 

Respondent. 

________________________

No. 07-13426

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

BIA No. A98-317-856

HENY ALIA PAUWELS-CAMPOS,

Petitioner, 

versus 
 The Petitioners originally filed four separate individual petitions for review which have 1

been consolidated as one appeal. 

3

U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, 

Respondent. 

________________________

Petitions for Review of a Decision of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

_________________________

(March 27, 2008)

Before BIRCH, DUBINA and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Jamie Fernando Lafaurie Carbonell (“Carbonell”) and his wife, Heny Alia

Pauwels-Campos (“Pauwels”) (collectively referred to as “Petitioners”), seek

review of: (1) the Board of Immigration Appeal’s (“BIA”) decision affirming the

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of their requests for cancellation of removal

under the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”) § 240A(b), 8 U.S.C. §

1229b(b); and (2) the BIA’s denial of their motion to reconsider the BIA’s prior

denial of their appeal and to reopen and remand the removal proceedings. 

1

Petitioners argue that the BIA’s denial of the Attorney General’s

discretionary determination that the circumstances that their two U.S. citizen

children would face if they were forced to relocate to Columbia did not merit a
 Although we would have jurisdiction if Petitioners’ appeal raised either a constitutional 2

claim or a question of law, neither of those questions are presented here. 

4

showing of “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship” as required by §

240A(b)(1)(D) of the INA; 8 U.S.C. 1229b(b)(1)(D) was erroneous. We have

previously held, however, that the BIA’s determination as to whether an individual

has demonstrated an “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship” for purposes of

cancellation of removal is a purely discretionary decision that is not subject to

judicial review. Martinez v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 446 F.3d 1219, 1222 (11th Cir.

2006); Gonzalez-Oropeza v. U.S. Att’y. Gen., 321 F.3d 1331, 1333 (11th Cir.

2003). 

2

We also find no merit to Petitioners’ arguments regarding the BIA’s denial

of their motion to reconsider and to reopen as they merely reiterate Petitioners’

prior concerns with the BIA’s discretionary determination on their requests for

cancellation of removal.

PETITIONS 07-11494 and 07-11495 are DISMISSED and PETITIONS 07-

13425 and 07-13426 are DENIED.
§ 27.1209 Reversion and overlay rights. ( a ) The frequencies associated with BRS incumbent authorizations that have cancelled automatically or otherwise recovered by the Commission automatically revert to the applicable BRS BTA licensee.
( b ) The frequencies associated with EBS incumbent authorizations with a geographic service area that have cancelled automatically or otherwise recovered by the Commission automatically revert to a co-channel EBS county-based licensee, except that if the area in question is Tribal Land as defined in § 27.1204(b)(3) and is contiguous to the GSA of a co-channel authorization issued in the Tribal Priority Window, the area consisting of Tribal Land reverts to the co-channel license issued in the Tribal Priority Window.
( c ) The frequencies associated with EBS authorizations issued in the Tribal Priority Window with a geographic service area that have cancelled automatically or otherwise recovered by the Commission automatically revert to a co-channel EBS county-based authorization.
[84 FR 57366, Oct. 25, 2019]
No. 11-5562.

#### Herring *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 59.3 Information concerning deployment of new services and equipment.

An incumbent local exchange carrier subject to the requirements of section 59.1 that has entered into an infrastructure sharing agreement under section 59.1 shall provide to each party to such agreement timely information on the planned deployment of telecommunications services and equipment, including any software or upgrades of software integral to the use or operation of such telecommunications equipment.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b)/RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Analogic Corporation (the
Company) for the quarter ended April 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, James W. Green, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 5, 2009



| |  |  |  |                                      
| |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
| |  |  |  | /s/ James W. Green                   
| |  |  |  |                                      
| |  |  |  | James W. Green                       
| |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
| |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)