Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 107 / Thursday, June 4, 2015 / Notices 31945 

8 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F). 

9 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C)(iii). 

10 15 U.S.C. 78q–1. 

11 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). 

12 In approving the proposed rule change, the 

Commission considered the proposed rule change’s 

impact on efficiency, competition and capital 

formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). 

13 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 

the Initial Rule Filing is consistent with 

the safeguarding of securities and funds 

in the custody or control of ICC or for 

which it is responsible, and the 

protection of investors and the public 

interest, within the meaning of Section 

17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act.8 Accordingly, 

the Commission finds good cause, 

pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)(C)(iii) of 

the Act,9 to approve the proposed rule 

change, as modified by Amendment No. 

1, prior to the thirtieth day after the date 

of publication of notice of Amendment 

No. 1 in the Federal Register. 

V. Solicitation of Comments 

Interested persons are invited to 

submit written data, views and 

arguments concerning the foregoing, 

including whether Amendment No. 1 is 

consistent with the Act. Comments may 

be submitted by any of the following 

methods: 

Electronic Comments 

• Use the Commission’s Internet 

comment form (http://www.sec.gov/

rules/sro.shtml), or 

• Send an email to rule-comments@

sec.gov. Please include File No. SR– 

ICC–2015–007 on the subject line. 

Paper Comments 

• Send paper comments in triplicate 

to Secretary, Securities and Exchange 

Commission, 100 F Street NE., 

Washington, DC 20549–1090. 

All submissions should refer to File 

Number SR–ICC–2015–007. This file 

number should be included on the 

subject line if email is used. To help the 

Commission process and review your 

comments more efficiently, please use 

only one method. The Commission will 

post all comments on the Commission’s 

Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/

rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the 

submission, all subsequent 

amendments, all written statements 

with respect to the proposed rule 

change that are filed with the 

Commission, and all written 

communications relating to the 

proposed rule change between the 

Commission and any person, other than 

those that may be withheld from the 

public in accordance with the 

provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be 

available for Web site viewing and 

printing in the Commission’s Public 

Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 

Washington, DC 20549, on official 

business days between the hours of 

10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such 

filing also will be available for 

inspection and copying at the principal 

office of ICC and on ICC’s Web site at 

https://www.theice.com/clear-credit/

regulation. 

All comments received will be posted 

without change; the Commission does 

not edit personal identifying 

information from submissions. You 

should submit only information that 

you wish to make available publicly. All 

submissions should refer to File 

Number SR–ICC–2015–007 and should 

be submitted on or before June 25, 2015. 

VI. Conclusion 

On the basis of the foregoing, the 

Commission finds that the proposed 

rule change is consistent with the 

requirements of the Act and in 

particular with the requirements of 

Section 17A of the Act 10 and the rules 

and regulations thereunder. 

It is therefore ordered, pursuant to 

Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,11 that the 

proposed rule change (SR–ICC–2015– 

007), as modified by Amendment No. 1, 

be, and hereby is, approved on an 

accelerated basis.12

For the Commission, by the Division of 

Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated 

authority.13

Brent J. Fields, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2015–13611 Filed 6–3–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

[Public Notice: 9162] 

Rescission of Determination 

Regarding Cuba 

In accordance with section 6(j) of the 

Export Administration Act of 1979 (50 

U.S.C. App. 2405(j)), and as continued 

in effect by Executive Order 13222 of 

August 17, 2001, I hereby rescind the 

Determination of March 1, 1982, 

regarding Cuba, effective May 29, 2015. 

This action is based upon the 

considerations contained in the 

memorandum accompanying the 

Presidential Report of April 14, 2015, 

regarding Cuba. 

This rescission shall also satisfy the 

provisions of section 620A(c) of the 

Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, Public 

Law 87–195, as amended (22 U.S.C. 

2371(c)), and section 40(f) of the Arms 

Export Control Act, Public Law 90–629, 

as amended (22 U.S.C. 2780(f)). 

This notice shall be published in the 

Federal Register. 

Dated: May 28, 2015. 

John F. Kerry, 

Secretary of State. 

[FR Doc. 2015–13663 Filed 6–3–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710–10–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Notice of Intent To Rule on Request To 

Release Airport Property at the Lehigh 

Valley International Airport (ABE), 

Allentown, Pennsylvania 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of request to release 

airport property for non-aeronautical 

purposes. 

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and 

invite public comment on the release of 

land for non-aeronautical purposes at 

the Lehigh Valley International Airport 

(ABE), Allentown, Pennsylvania under 

the provision 49 U.P.C. 47125(a). 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before July 6, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Comments on this 

application may be mailed or delivered 

to the following address: 

Ryan Meyer, Senior Aviation Planner, 

Lehigh Valley International Airport, 

3311 Airport Road, Allentown, 

Pennsylvania 18109, 

and at the FAA Harrisburg Airports 

District Office: 

Lori K. Pagnanelli, Manager, Harrisburg 

Airports District Office, 3905 

Hartzdale Dr., Suite 508, Camp Hill, 

PA 17011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick 

Harner, Civil Engineer, Harrisburg 

Airports District Office, location listed 

above. 

The request to release property may 

be reviewed in person at this same 

location. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA 

invites public comment on the request 

to release airport property for nonaeronautical purposes at the Lehigh 

Valley International Airport under the 

provisions of Section 47125(a) of Title 

49 U.S.C. On May 27, 2015, the FAA 

determined that the request to release 

airport property for non-aeronautical 

purposes at the Lehigh Valley 

International Airport (ABE), 

Pennsylvania, submitted by the Lehigh 

Northampton Airport Authority 

(Authority), met the procedural 

requirements. Final release of the 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
31946 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 107 / Thursday, June 4, 2015 / Notices 

property is subject to FAA’s NEPA 

determination. 

The following is a brief overview of 

the request: 

The Authority requests the release of 

a portion of airport property totaling 260 

acres, which is no longer needed for 

aeronautical purposes. Of the total 260 

acres, 248 acres are part of Parcel H–1, 

and 12 acres are part of Parcel X–2. 

These parcels are located in Allen 

Township, and were originally included 

as part of larger property purchased 

with federal funds over multiple AIP 

grants. 

The 260 acres requested for nonaeronautical use, are to be released to 

the Rockefeller Group Development 

Corporation (Rockefeller Group), 500 

International Drive North, Suite 345, Mt. 

Olive, NJ 07828. The property is located 

in the northwest corner of existing 

airport property. Rockefeller Group is 

proposing to sell the 260 acre property 

to FedEx Ground for the construction of 

a ground transportation facility. The 

undeveloped property is located in 

Allen Township at the intersection of 

Willowbrook Road and Race Street. As 

shown on the Airport Layout Plan, the 

airport property does not serve an 

aeronautical purpose and is not needed 

for current or future airport 

development. The property was part of 

an inverse condemnation judgment 

against the Authority. The proceeds 

from the Fair Market Value (FMV) sale 

of the 260 acres of property will be used 

to pay off the judgment and the 

remaining balance will be placed into 

an identifiable interest bearing account 

to be used for eligible airport 

development purposes, as outlined in 

FAA Order 5190.6B, Airport 

Compliance Manual. 

Any person may inspect the request 

by appointment at the FAA office 

address listed above. Interested persons 

are invited to comment on the proposed 

release. All comments will be 

considered by the FAA to the extent 

practicable. 

Issued in Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, May 

28, 2015. 

Lori K. Pagnanelli, 

Manager, Harrisburg Airports District Office. 

[FR Doc. 2015–13501 Filed 6–3–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Aviation Rulemaking Advisory 

Committee; Transport Airplane and 

Engine Issues; New Task 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of new task assignment 

for the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory 

Committee (ARAC). 

SUMMARY: The FAA assigned the 

Aviation Rulemaking Advisory 

Committee (ARAC) a new task to 

provide recommendations regarding the 

incorporation of airframe-level 

crashworthiness and ditching standards 

into Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations (14 CFR) part 25 and 

development of associated advisory 

material. The issue is during the 

development of current airworthiness 

standards and regulatory guidance, the 

FAA assumed that airframe structure for 

transport airplanes would be 

constructed predominantly of metal, 

using skin-stringer-frame architecture. 

Therefore, certain requirements either 

do not address all of the issues 

associated with nonmetallic materials, 

or have criteria that are based on 

experience with traditionally-configured 

large metallic airplanes. With respect to 

crashworthiness, there is no airframelevel standard for crashworthiness. 

Many of the factors that influence 

airframe performance under crash 

conditions on terrain also influence 

airframe performance under ditching 

conditions. Past studies and 

investigations have included 

recommendations for review of certain 

regulatory requirements and guidance 

material to identify opportunities for 

improving survivability during a 

ditching event; consideration of these 

recommendations is included in this 

tasking. 

This notice informs the public of the 

new ARAC activity and solicits 

membership for the Transport Airplane 

Crashworthiness and Ditching Working 

Group. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ian 

Won, Federal Aviation Administration, 

1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 

98055, ian.y.won@faa.gov, phone 

number 425–227–2145, facsimile 

number 425–227–1232. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

ARAC Acceptance of Task 

As a result of the March 19, 2015 

ARAC meeting, the FAA has assigned 

and ARAC has accepted this task and 

will establish the Transport Airplane 

Crashworthiness and Ditching Working 

Group, Transport Airplane and Engine 

Issues. The working group will serve as 

staff to the ARAC and provide advice 

and recommendations on the assigned 

task. The ARAC will review and 

approve the recommendation report and 

will submit it to the FAA. 

Background 

The FAA established the ARAC to 

provide information, advice, and 

recommendations on aviation related 

issues that could result in rulemaking to 

the FAA Administrator, through the 

Associate Administrator of Aviation 

Safety. 

The Transport Airplane 

Crashworthiness and Ditching Working 

Group will provide advice and 

recommendations to the ARAC on 

airframe-level crashworthiness and 

ditching standards to incorporate into 

part 25 and any associated advisory 

material. 

The requirements of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 25.561 

apply equally to structure constructed 

from either metallic or nonmetallic 

materials, and regardless of the design 

architecture and airplane size. Guidance 

material is mainly contained in FAA 

Advisory Circular (AC) 25–17A. While 

not explicitly stated in part 25, during 

the development of current 

airworthiness standards and published 

advisory circulars, the FAA assumed 

that airplane airframes would be 

constructed predominantly of metal, 

using skin-stringer-frame architecture. 

Therefore, some of the requirements 

either do not address all of the issues 

associated with nonmetallic materials, 

or have criteria that are based on 

experience with traditionally-configured 

large metallic airplanes. With respect to 

crashworthiness, there is no airframelevel standard for crashworthiness. The 

FAA promulgated standards for 

occupant protection at the seat 

installation level, with the presumption 

that the airframe provides an acceptable 

level of crashworthiness. Thus when an 

applicant proposes to use 

unconventional fuselage structure 

(materials, design, or both), the FAA has 

written special conditions to ensure the 

level of crash protection is equivalent to 

that provided by a traditionallyconfigured metallic airplane. These 

special conditions have been 

comparative in nature, and do not 

establish performance standards that are 

independent of traditional metallic skinstringer-frame architecture for airframe 

crashworthiness. 

Crashworthiness Factors: Many 

factors influence the crashworthiness of 

an airframe, including materials of 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES