alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

717 MADISON PLACE, N.W.

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20439

PETER R. MARKSTEINER

CLERK OF COURT

CLERK’S OFFICE

202-275-8000

September 30, 2022

Appointment of New Advisory Council Members

Chief Judge Kimberly A. Moore has appointed the following new members to the 

Advisory Council for the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit: 

Eldora Ellison, Ph.D., of Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox

Michelle Klancnik of the U.S. International Trade Commission 

Roman Martinez of Latham Watkins LLP

Sonal Mehta of WilmerHale 

These appointments are for terms of three years and are effective October 1, 2022. 

The Advisory Council for the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

was established pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2077(b) to review, study, and make 

recommendations regarding the Federal Circuit Rules of Practice and Internal 

Operating Procedures of the court, as well as to serve as a conduit between the public

and the court regarding the court’s procedural rules. The full listing of all current 

members of the Advisory Council is available on the court’s website. 

On behalf of the full court, Chief Judge Moore recognizes and thanks the departing 

members of the Advisory Council for their service.

###
#### § 73.6020 Protection of stations in the land mobile radio service.

An application to change the facilities of an existing Class A TV station will not be accepted if it fails to protect stations in the land mobile radio service pursuant to the requirements specified in § 74.709 of this chapter.

[89 FR 7263, Feb. 1, 2024]
Exhibit 99.1




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                18 U.S.C. S 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Scientific  Energy,  Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the period  ending June 30, 2002,  as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Todd B.  Crosland,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. S 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



/s/ Todd B. Crosland
Todd B. Crosland
Chief Executive Officer
August 12, 2002
§ 73.687 Transmission system requirements. ( a ) - ( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) *Requirements applicable to transmitters are as follows:* ( 1 ) [Reserved]
( 2 ) The transmitters shall be equipped with suitable indicating instruments for the determination of operating power and with other instruments necessary for proper adjustment, operation, and maintenance of the equipment.
( 3 ) Adequate provision shall be made for varying the output power of the transmitters to compensate for excessive variations in line voltage or for other factors affecting the output power.
( 4 ) Adequate provisions shall be provided in all component parts to avoid overheating at the rated maximum output powers.
( d ) The construction, installation, and operation of broadcast equipment is expected to conform with all applicable local, state, and federally imposed safety regulations and standards, enforcement of which is the responsibility of the issuing regulatory agency.
(Secs. 4, 5, 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1066, 1068, 1082 (47 U.S.C. 154, 155, 303))
[28 FR 13660, Dec. 14, 1963] Editorial Note
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations affecting § 73.687, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*
§ 32.2002 Property held for future telecommunications use. ( a ) This account shall include the original cost of property owned and held for no longer than two years under a definite plan for use in telecommunications service. If at the end of two years the property is not in service, the original cost of the property may remain in this account so long as the carrier excludes the original cost and associated depreciation from its ratebase and ratemaking considerations and report those amounts in reports filed with the Commission pursuant to 43.21(e)(1) and 43.21(e)(2) of this chapter.
( b ) Subsidiary records shall be maintained to show the character of the amounts carried in this account.
[65 FR 16334, Mar. 28, 2000]
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 166 (Monday, August 28, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 50885]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7194]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Eastern Arizona Counties Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Eastern Arizona Counties Resource Advisory Committee will 
meet in Overgaard, Arizona. The purpose of the meeting is to evaluate 
project proposals for possible funding in accordance with Pub. L. 106-
393 (the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act).

DATES: The meeting will be held September 22, 2006 starting at 11 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in the fellowship room at the First 
Southern Baptist Church, 2727 Church Lane, Overgaard, Arizona 85933. 
Send written comments to Robert Dyson, Eastern Arizona Counties 
Resource Advisory Committee, c/o Forest Service, USDA, P.O. Box 640, 
Springerville, Arizona 85938 or electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#91e3f5e8e2feffd1f7e2bff7f4f5bfe4e2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e597819c968a8ba58396cb838081cb9096">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Dyson, Public Affairs Officer, 
Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests (928) 333-4301.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Committee 
discussion is limited to Forest Service staff, project proponents, and 
Committee members. However, persons who wish to bring Pub. L. 106-393 
related matters to the attention of the Committee may file written 
statements with the Committee staff before or after the meeting. Public 
input sessions will be provided and individuals who made written 
requests by September 6, 2006, will have the opportunity to address the 
Committee at those sessions.

    Dated: August 19, 2006.
Elaine J. Zieroth,
Forest Supervisor, Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests.
[FR Doc. 06-7194 Filed 8-25-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
-

Devany, Dennis (OSn 

. From: joy mazur [mazurjoy@yahoo.com] 

Sent: . Sunday, February 14, 2010 1:35 PM 

to:':-' , - Devany, Dennis (OST) 

Subject: Cape Air/Colgan Air 

DearMr. Devany,· 


I am a clinton county resident and very much oppose replacing cape air with colgan air. Cape air has proved to be a very 


reliable airline with many flights a week to Boston that my familymembers and I have made good use of.Their safety 

record is also an important factor along with having a good economic tract record important to this area. 

It is very disappointing to me that our county legislators are more concerned about our Canadian ~ighbors and their 

traveling needs than the people of clinton county. 


I hope thatyou will recommend to the clinton county legislators keeping cape airlines. 


Thank you. 


Sincerely, 


Eleanor Joy Mazur 


62 Barton RD. 

Plattsburgh, NY. 12901 

1
#### § 73.3593 Designation for hearing.

If the FCC is unable, in the case of any application for an instrument of authorization, to make the findings specified in § 73.3591(a), it will formally designate the application for hearing on the grounds or reasons then obtaining and will forthwith notify the applicant and all known parties in interest of such action and the grounds and reasons therefor, specifying with particularity the matters and things in issue but not including issues or requirements phrased generally. If, however, the issue to be resolved is limited to the mutual exclusivity of applications for initial authorizations or for major changes to existing stations, that mutual exclusivity shall be resolved pursuant to competitive bidding procedures identified in subpart I (unreserved channels) or point system procedures identified in subpart K (reserved channels).

[65 FR 36379, June 8, 2000]
No. 11-1356.

#### Memorylink Corp. *v.*Motorola, Inc., et al.

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 10-10870.

#### Portillo-Quezada, aka Quezada *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 22.307 Operation during emergency. Licensees of stations in the Public Mobile services may, during a period of emergency in which normal communications facilities are disrupted as a result of hurricane, flood, earthquake or other natural disaster, civil unrest, widespread vandalism, national emergencies or emergencies declared by Executive Order of the President, use their stations to temporarily provide emergency communications services in a manner or configuration not normally allowed by this part, provided that such operations comply with the provisions of this section. ( a ) *Technical limitations.* Public Mobile stations providing temporary emergency communications service must not transmit: ( 1 ) On channels other than those authorized for normal operations.
( 2 ) With power in excess of that authorized for normal operations;
( 3 ) Emission types other than those authorized for normal operations.
( b ) *Discontinuance.* Temporary emergency use of Public Mobile stations must be discontinued as soon as normal communication facilities are restored. The FCC may, at any time, order the discontinuance of any such emergency communication services.
EXHIBIT 99.1
                           ============

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of StarSoft, Inc.
(Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Marvin Wosk, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to the best of my knowledge and belief:

   (1)  this quarterly report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
        1934; and

   (2)  the information contained in the quarterly report fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operations of Registrant.



Date: May 11, 2004           /s/ Marvin Wosk
                              ----------------------------------
                              Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                              Financial Officer of
                              StarSoft, Inc., Registrant





















                                 26

<PAGE>
# Vacant

### Director of Strategic Engagement

### 

###
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Federalfirearms regulations reference guide [electronic resource].**
 
2000 | 2005 | 2014
 
SuDoc Number: T70.8:F 51/3/ | J 38.8/2:
Item Number:0971-F (online) | 0718-H-04 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000585520
 
June 18, 2018
No. 11-5670.

#### Brown *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
§ 73.1800 General requirements related to the station log. ( a ) The licensee of each station must maintain a station log as required by § 73.1820. This log shall be kept by station employees competent to do so, having actual knowledge of the facts required. All entries, whether required or not by the provisions of this part, must accurately reflect the station operation. Any employee making a log entry shall sign the log, thereby attesting to the fact that the entry, or any correction or addition made thereto, is an accurate representation of what transpired.
( b ) The logs shall be kept in an orderly and legible manner, in suitable form and in such detail that the data required for the particular class of station concerned are readily available. Key letters or abbreviations may be used if the proper meaning or explanation is contained elsewhere in the log. Each sheet must be numbered and dated. Time entries must be made in local time and must be indicated as advanced (e.g., EDT) or non-advanced (e.g., EST) time.
( c ) Any necessary corrections of a manually kept log after it has been signed in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section shall be made only by striking out the erroneous portion and making a corrective explanation on the log or attachment to it. Such corrections shall be dated and signed by the person who kept the log or the station chief operator, the station manager or an officer of the licensee.
( d ) No automatically kept log shall be altered in any way after entries have been recorded. When automatic logging processes fail or malfunction, the log must be kept manually for that period and in accordance with the requirements of this section.
( e ) No log, or portion thereof, shall be erased, obliterated or willfully destroyed during the period in which it is required to be retained. (Section 73.1840, Retention of logs.)
( f ) Application forms for licenses and other authorizations may require that certain technical operating data be supplied. These application forms should be kept in mind in connection with the maintenance of the station log.
[43 FR 45850, Oct. 4, 1978, as amended at 48 FR 38481, Aug. 24, 1983; 48 FR 44806, Sept. 30, 1983; 49 FR 14509, Apr. 12, 1984; 49 FR 33663, Aug. 24, 1984; 50 FR 40016, Oct. 1, 1985]
#### § 22.303 [Reserved]
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zap.Com Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Leonard
DiSalvo, as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Leonard DiSalvo                                 
|                                                    
|Leonard DiSalvo                                     
|Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer
|November 12, 2003                                   

This Certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

19
# Comments on: 2020-1673: Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Biogen MA Inc.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 150 (Friday, August 4, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 44262]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6711]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURE TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, August 4, 2006.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Eileen A. Donovan,
Acting Secretary of Commission.
[FR Doc. 06-6711 Filed 8-2-06; 10:33 am]
BILLING CODE 6151-01-M
§ 54.605 Determining the rural rate. ( a ) Effective funding year 2024, the rural rate shall be the average of the rates actually being charged to commercial customers, other than health care providers, for identical or similar services provided by the telecommunications carrier providing the service in the rural area in which the health care provider is located. The rates included in this average shall be for services provided over the same distance as the eligible service. The rates averaged to calculate the rural rate must not include any rates reduced by universal service support mechanisms. The “rural rate” shall be used as described in this subpart to determine the credit or reimbursement due to a telecommunications carrier that provides eligible telecommunications services to eligible health care providers.
( b ) If the telecommunications carrier serving the health care provider is not providing any identical or similar services in the rural area, then the rural rate shall be the average of the tariffed and other publicly available rates, not including any rates reduced by universal service programs, charged for the same or similar services in that rural area over the same distance as the eligible service by other carriers. If there are no tariffed or publicly available rates for such services in that rural area, or if the carrier reasonably determines that this method for calculating the rural rate is unfair, then the carrier shall submit for the state commission's approval, for intrastate rates, or for the Commission's approval, for interstate rates, a cost-based rate for the provision of the service in the most economically efficient, reasonably available manner. ( 1 ) The carrier must provide, to the state commission, for intrastate rates, or to the Commission, for interstate rates, a justification of the proposed rural rate, including an itemization of the costs of providing the requested service.
( 2 ) The carrier must provide such information periodically thereafter as required, by the state commission for intrastate rates or the Commission for interstate rates. In doing so, the carrier much take into account anticipated and actual demand for telecommunications services by all customers who will use the facilities over which services are being provided to eligible health care providers.
[88 FR 17395, Mar. 23, 2023]
# Michele G. Markoff

/ Published Feb. 2, 2023

Michele Markoff is the former acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for International Cyberspace Security in the Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy.  Since 1998 Michele has been the senior State Department subject matter expert overseeing the development and implementation of foreign policy initiatives on cyberspace issues. She helps to coordinate United States policy on the spectrum of cyber-related policy issues across the Department, develops diplomatic strategies to encourage states to join the United States in taking steps to protect their critical networks and to cooperate internationally to enhance and preserve global cyber stability. She implements those strategies through negotiations in a wide variety of venues. Her initiative led to the successful completion of the first ever bilateral agreement on confidence-building in cyber space between the United State and the Russian Federation, announced in June, 2013. Michele also has been the United States Government Expert on five Groups of UN Government Experts (2005, 2010, 2013, 2015, 2016) devoted to international security cyber issues. The last three GGEs led to landmark consensus reports regarding norms for state activity in cyberspace. Ms. Markoff is also the architect of two agreements on cyber confidence-building measures in the Organization of Security Cooperation in Europe, and a similar initiative in the ASEAN Regional Forum.

Ms. Markoff was trained as an expert in Russian and Chinese military affairs and decision-making and spent the first half of her career in a variety of strategic nuclear arms control-related posts, among them as State Department Advisor and then Executive Secretary to the START I Talks; later as Senior Policy Advisor and Director of the U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency’s Policy Planning Group.

Ms. Markoff has a B.A. in International Relations from Reed College, an M.A. in International Relations and an M.Phil.in Political Science from Yale University, and a M.Sc. in National Security Strategy from the National War College of the United States. She also attended high school in the former Soviet Union and attended the Chinese University of Hong Kong.
§ 73.28 Assignment of stations to channels. ( a ) The Commission will not make an AM station assignment that does not conform with international requirements and restrictions on spectrum use that the United States has accepted as a signatory to treaties, conventions, and other international agreements. See § 73.1650 for a list of pertinent treaties, conventions and agreements, and § 73.23 for procedural provisions relating to compliance with them.
( b ) Engineering standards now in force domestically differ in some respects from those specified for international purposes. The engineering standards specified for international purposes (see § 73.1650, International Agreements) will be used to determine: ( 1 ) The extent to which interference might be caused by a proposed station in the United States to a station in another country; and
( 2 ) whether the United States should register an objection to any new or changed assignment notified by another country. The domestic standards in effect in the United States will be used to determine the extent to which interference exists or would exist from a foreign station where the value of such interference enters into a calculation of: ( i ) The service to be rendered by a proposed operation in the United States; or
( ii ) the permissible interfering signal from one station in the United States to another United States station.
[28 FR 13574, Dec. 14, 1963, as amended at 29 FR 9499, July 11, 1964; 49 FR 32358, Aug. 14, 1984; 50 FR 18821, May 2, 1985; 54 FR 39736, Sept. 28, 1989; 56 FR 64857, Dec. 12, 1991]
#### § 76.1703 Commercial records on children's programs.

Cable operators airing children's programming must maintain records sufficient to verify compliance with § 76.225 and make such records available to the public. Such records must be maintained for a period sufficient to cover the limitations period specified in 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(6)(B).