alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 22.351 Channel assignment policy.

The channels allocated for use in the Public Mobile Services are listed in the applicable subparts of this part. Channels and channel blocks are assigned in such a manner as to facilitate the rendition of service on an interference-free basis in each service area. Except as otherwise provided in this part, each channel or channel block is assigned exclusively to one licensee in each service area. All applicants for, and licensees of, stations in the Public Mobile Services shall cooperate in the selection and use of channels in order to minimize interference and obtain the most efficient use of the allocated spectrum.

[70 FR 19308, Apr. 13, 2005]
ThetablebelowlistsboththeRSMeans®historicalcostIndex:basedonJan.1,1993=100aswellasthecomputedvalueofanindex:basedonJan.1,2014costs.SincetheJan.1,2014figureisestimated,spaceislefttowriteintheactualIndex:figuresastheybecomeavailablethroughdt.herthequarterlyRSMeansConstructionCostIndexesorasprintedinllstoricalCurrentIndexCostIndexBasedonHistDricalCostIndextheEngtneertngNews-Rerord.Tocomputetheactualindex:basedonJan.1,2014=100,dividethehistoricalcostIndex:furaparticularyearbytheactualJan.1,2014constructioncostindex.Spacehasbeenlefttoadvancetheindexfiguresastheyearprogresses.Camnt.,dexllstoricalCurrentIndexBasedonCostIndexBasedonYearJan.1,1993=100Jan.1,2014=100YearJan.1,1993=100Jan.1,2014=100YearJan.1,1993=100Jan.1,2014=100Est.ActualEst.ActualActualOct2014*July1999117.6July2014*1998115.1April2014*1997112.8Jan2014*202.7100.0100.01996110.2July2013201.299.31995107.62012194.696.01994104.42011191.294.31993101.72010183.590.5199299.42009180.188.9199196.82008180.489.0199094.32007169.483.6198992.12006162.079.9198889.92005151.674.8198787.72004143.770.9198684.22003132.065.1198582.62002128.763.5198482.02001125.161.7198380.22000120.959.6198276.1AlllustlllentatoCoatsThe"HistoricalCostIndex:"canbeusedtoconvertnationalbuildingcostsataparticulartimetotheapproximatebuildingcostsforsomeothertime.b:ample:andcompareconstructioncostsfurditrerentyearsinthesamecity.Toestimatethenationalconsttuctioncostofabuildingin1970,knowingthatitcost$900,000in2014:INDEXin1970=113.7INDEXin2014=202.7Note:ThecitycostindexesfurQmadacanbeusedtoconvertU.S.nationalaveragestolocalcostsinCanadiandollars.EstActualActual58.0July198170.056.8198062.955.6197957.854.4197853.553.1197749.551.5197646.950.2197544.849.1197441.447.8197337.746.5197234.845.5197132.144.3197028.743.3196926.941.6196824.940.8196723.540.4196622.739.5196521.737.6196421.21imeAdjustmentUsingtheIDstorica1CostIndex:furYearA---,-----,----xCostinYearB=CostinYearAIndexfurYearBINDEX1970XCost2014=Cost1970INDEX201428'7X$900,000=.142X$900,000=$128,000202.7Theconstructioncostofthebuildingin1970is$128,000.-mstoricalCostIndexupdatesandotherresourcesareprovidedonthefollowingwebsite.http://www.reedconstructirsmeans/cbgnoticr/456321Est.Actual34.531.028.526.424.423.122.120.418.617.215.814.213.312.311.611.210.710.5
Order entered Febr uary 10 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 00914
- CR CODY JOHN HOLT, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas Trial Cour t Cause No. 062011 

### O RDER
The Court REINSTATE S the appeal. On January 16, 2015, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’s brief has not been filed. We ADOPT the findings that: (1) appellant desires to pursue the appeal; (2) a ppellant is indigent; (3) counsel’s explanation for the delay in filing appellant’s brief is h er workload, the size of the record, and personal issues; and (4) counsel
indicated s he would tender appellant’s brief to the Court by February 9, 2015.
We GRANT appellant ’s February 9, 2015 second motion to extend time to file his brief and motion to accept a brief in excess of the word limit. We ORDER the appellant’s brief received on February 9, 2015 filed of the date of this order.On January 8, 2015, we recei ved a supplemental clerk’s record with a letter from counsel

to court reporter Cindy Bardwell requesting preparation of a supplemental reporter’s record from a hearing conducted in the trial court’s chambers on April 1, 2014. The Court has not received a supplemental reporter’s record from an April 1, 2014 proceeding, nor has Ms. Bardwell communicated with the Court regarding the status of that record. Accordingly, we ORDER Cindy Bardwell, official court reporter of the 59th Judicial District Court, to fil e, within TWENTY
- ONE DAYS of the date of this order, either the reporter’s record from the April 1, 2014 proceedings or written verification that the proceedings in the trial court’s chambers on April 1, 2014 were not recorded. On January 14, 2015, appell ant filed a motion to abate the appeal to allow the trial court to enter written findings of fact and conclusions of law with regards to the motion to suppress appellant’s statement. It does not appear th e issue of written findings of fact and conclusions of
law was presented to the trial court while the appeal was abated. Accordingly, we ORDER the trial court to prepare and file with this Court, within
TWENTY
- ONE DAYS of the date of this order, written findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding its ruling on appellant’s mot ion to suppress his statement. See T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P.
A NN . art. 38.22, § 6 (West Supp. 2014 ).

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order regarding the written findings of fact and conclusions of law on the motion to suppress . The appeal shall be reinstated twenty

- one days from the date of this order or when the findings of fact
and conclusions of law are received, whichever is earlier.
/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
Opinion issued July 7, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-16-00470-CR

———————————

IN RE KENNETH W. JEROME, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Kenneth W. Jerome, incarcerated and proceeding pro se, has filed a 

petition for a writ of mandamus, seeking to compel the trial court to rule on his 

post-conviction “Motion for Discovery.”1

 

1 Relator’s petition identifies the underlying proceeding as The State of Texas v. 

Kenneth W. Jerome, Cause No. 1233728, in the 263rd District Court of Harris 

County, Texas, the Honorable Jim Wallace presiding.
2

We deny the petition.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Lloyd.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
No. 11-5647.

#### Weaver *v.*Massachusetts.

Sup. Jud. Ct. Mass. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>

The following sets forth the computation of basic earnings per share at
December 31, 1998, 1997, 1996 and 1995.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

NUMERATOR                                             1998              1997              1996              1995
---------                                             ----              ----              ----              ----
<S>                                               <C>               <C>               <C>               <C>
NET LOSS BEFORE SETTLEMENTS/
LIABILITY EXTINGUISHMENTS                         $   (65,756)      $   (18,292)      $  (537,557)      $  (991,424)

SETTLEMENTS/LIABILITY
EXTINGUISHMENTS (Note 1)                              305,489           177,324           925,178         1,755,554
                                                  -----------       -----------       -----------       -----------
NET INCOME                                        $   239,733       $   159,032       $   387,621       $   764,130
                                                  ===========       ===========       ===========       ===========

DENOMINATOR FOR BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE
----------------------------------------

WEIGHTED NUMBER OF SHARES USED

IN COMPUTING NET INCOME (LOSS)

PER SHARE                                           5,552,869         5,251,647         5,071,510         4,817,720

NET LOSS BEFORE SETTLEMENTS/
LIABILITY EXTINGUISHMENTS
PER SHARE                                         $     (0.01)      $     (0.00)      $     (0.11)      $     (0.20)
                                                  ===========       ===========       ===========       ===========
SETTLEMENTS/LIABILITY
EXTINGUISHMENTS PER SHARE                         $      0.05       $      0.03       $      0.19       $      0.36
                                                  ===========       ===========       ===========       ===========
NET INCOME PER SHARE                              $      0.04       $      0.03       $      0.08       $      0.16
                                                  ===========       ===========       ===========       ===========
</TABLE>

Based on estimated fair market values, outstanding options and warrants are
considered antidilutive for all years presented. After year end, 50,000 shares
of convertible preferred stock and 8,055 shares of common stock were issued in
connection with the FORTESA merger, as well as common shares issued in
connection with the conversion of long-term debt.
#### § 73.6008 Distance computations.

The distance between two reference points must be calculated in accordance with § 73.208(c) of this part.
[Civ. No. 1441.

Second Appellate District.

February 5, 1914.]

#### ANTONIO SILVEIRA COSTA, Respondent, v. DOMINGOS SILVEIRA RAZA, Appellant.

Appeal—Order Refusing to Dissol-e Attachment—Grounds of Motion not Disclosed by Record.—An order denying a motion to dissolve a writ of attachment wil be affirmed on appeal, where the grounds upon which the motion was made are not disclosed by the record. An appellate court cannot assume error in the rulings of the trial court; error must affiimitively appear from the record, otherwise the judgment will be affirmed.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Kings County refusing to dissolve a writ of attachment. M. L. Short, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

E. T. Cosper, for Appellant.

Miller *&*Miller, for Respondent.

SHAW, J.

Appeal from an or der of court denying defendant’s motion to dissolve a writ of attachment issued in the cause.

The grounds upon which the motion was made are not disclosed by the record; hence, it is impossible for the court to say the trial judge erred in mal: mg the order from which. defendant appeals. The only statement in reference thereto is, “that on the 2d day of September, 1913, in pursuance of due and legal notice duly given ,md served upon the plaintiff’s attorneys, Miller & Miller, the defendant, through his attorney, E. T. Gosper, moved i.lie court to set aside and dissolve the levy made under and by virtue of the attachment issued out of said court in :aid matter.” The order recites: “The motion of defendant, to discharge the attachment and the motion to set aside and dissolve the levy made under and by virtue of said attachment, coming on for further hearing at this time, and said motions having been argued, . . . the court having sufficiently considered the law in the premises, orders that said motions be and the same are denied.”

*755While the record contains certain affidavits read at the hearing of the motion, it is impossible, without knowing what the motion was, to say that the court erred in holding that the facts shown by the affidavits were insufficient to support the sainé. Since every intendment is in favor of the judgment of the trial court, we cannot assume error in its rulings; it must affirmatively appear from the record, otherwise the judgment will be affirmed.

The order is affirmed.

Conrey P. J., and James, J., concurred.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-20818

SHIRLEY SHIRLEY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

KMART CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(H-94-CV-4416)

October 20, 1998

Before DeMOSS, PARKER, AND DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM*:

AFFIRMED. See 5th Cir. R. 47.6
#### § 53.301 [Reserved]
No. 11-5258.

#### Gee *v.*Kerestes, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Mahanoy, et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 73.759 Auxiliary transmitters. Upon showing that a need exists for the use of auxiliary transmitters, a license may be issued provided that: ( a ) Auxiliary transmitters may be installed either at the same location as the main transmitters or at another location.
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) The auxiliary transmitters shall be maintained so that they may be put into immediate operation at any time for the following purposes: ( 1 ) The transmission of the regular programs upon the failure of the main transmitters.
( 2 ) The transmission of regular programs during maintenance or modification work on the main transmitter, necessitating discontinuance of its operation for a period not to exceed 5 days. (This includes the equipment changes which may be made without authority as set forth elsewhere in the rules and regulations or as authorized by the Commission by letter or by construction permit. Where such operation is required for periods in excess of 5 days, request therefor shall be made electronically in the International Communications Filing System (ICFS) in accordance with § 73.3542).
( 3 ) Upon request by a duly authorized representative of the Commission.
( d ) The auxiliary transmitters shall be tested at least once each week to determine that they are in proper operating condition and that they are adjusted to the proper frequency except that in the case of operation in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section during any week, the test in that week may be omitted provided the operation under paragraph (c) of this section is satisfactory. A record shall be kept of the time and result of each test. Such records shall be retained for a period of two years.
( e ) The auxiliary transmitters shall be equipped with satisfactory control equipment which will enable the maintenance of the frequency emitted by the station within the limits prescribed by the regulations in this part.
( f ) The operating power of an auxiliary transmitter may be less but not greater than the authorized power of the main transmitters.
[28 FR 13696, Dec. 14, 1963, as amended at 37 FR 25843, Dec. 5, 1972; 60 FR 55480, Nov. 1, 1995. Redesignated at 70 FR 46677, Aug. 10, 2005, as amended at 86 FR 54401, Oct. 1, 2021; 88 FR 21447, Apr. 10, 2023]
---

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 United States Code §
1350As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The
undersigned hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal
year ended January 31, 2012 of PolyMet Mining Corp. (the Company) filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

|Date: May 1, 2012 | By:    | /s/ Joseph Scipioni                                        
|----------------- | ------ | -----------------------------------------------------------
|                  |        |                                                            
|                  | Name:  | Joseph Scipioni                                            
|                  |        |                                                            
|                  | Title: | Chief Executive Officer
      (Principal Executive Officer)
|                  |        |                                                            
|                  |        |                                                            
|Date: May 1, 2012 | By:    | /s/ Douglas Newby                                          
|                  |        |                                                            
|                  | Name:  | Douglas Newby                                              
|                  |        |                                                            
|                  | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
      (Principal Financial Officer)

---
EX-10.7



 





Exhibit 10.7




April  5,  2000




PERSONAL & CONFIDENTIAL




Mr. John A. Pratt Jr.

Hudson Valley Bank 21

Scarsdale Road Yonkers,

New York 10707




Dear John:



I am writing this letter to confirm our understanding that you will continue to act as a Consultant
to the Bank through December 31, 2000, primarily in its business Retention and Business Development
programs.




     The plan is for you to make between 30 and 40 calls a month, which you will schedule at your
convenience. These calls generally will fall into two categories: (1) present VIP customers, and
(2) present Major Accounts who we believe may become VIP’s or who are fairly high income producers
in the Major category. Follow-up on the Business Development Lists will be re-assigned to others.



     We are hopeful that you can make many of these calls alone, but if you believe others
should accompany you, this will b e your call. You should prepare a monthly report, which
will be directed, to me.



     You will be operating through me as the Chairman of the Board and I hope to be providing you
with updated lists each quarter. The concentration this year should again be on the VIP’s and the
very high Majors.




 









 








	 	 	 	 	 
	Mr. John A. Pratt Jr.

	 	-2-
	 	April 5, 2000






     You will be paid a consulting fee of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000) for the year 2000,
payable monthly at the beginning of the month at the rate of $4,166.66. A make-up for the first 4
months of this year will be issued sometime this month.



     If this is your understanding, please sign the enclosed copy of this letter where indicated
and return to me.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Regards,
	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	William E. Griffin	 	 
	 

	 	Chairman of the Board	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 





	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	AGREED 6 ACCEPTED:	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	  	 	 
	John A. Pratt Jr.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Dated:

	 	  
	 	 	2000	 	 	 






-2-
EXHIBIT 23
                                   ----------

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
                         -------------------------------


         We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference  in this Annual  Report
(Form 10-K) of Toys "R" Us, Inc. and  subsidiaries of our report dated March 11,
1998,  included in the 1997 Annual Report to  Stockholders  of Toys "R" Us, Inc.
and subsidiaries.

         We also  consent to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  Registration
Statements  (Form S-4 Number  33-56303  and 33-18863  Form S-3 Numbers  2-87794,
33-23264,  33-34273,  33-42237, 33-51359 and 33-64315; Form S-8 Numbers 2-64887,
2-91834, 33-42627,  333-11861,  333-15841,  333-23441 and 333-20385) of Toys "R"
Us, Inc. and  subsidiaries  of our report dated March 11, 1998,  with respect to
the consolidated financial statements incorporated herein by reference.


                                                   /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

New York, New York
April 24, 1998


<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Syed Fahad, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of NetFabric Holdings,
Inc (the" Company").

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d 15 for the Company and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) [Reserved]

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal
quarter ( the Company's fourth fiscal quarter in case of an annual report) that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Company's auditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting.

May 22, 2006

/s/ Syed Fahad
-------------------------------------------
Name: Syed Fahad
Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer