alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4727 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4727

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To designate the Federal building located at 125 Market Street in 
    Youngstown, Ohio, as the ``Thomas D. Lambros Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 125 Market Street in Youngstown, 
Ohio, shall be known and designated as the ``Thomas D. Lambros Federal 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Thomas D. Lambros 
Federal Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives August 8, 1994.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
                                     

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4727

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To designate the Federal building located at 125 Market Street in 
    Youngstown, Ohio, as the ``Thomas D. Lambros Federal Building''.
```
No. 11-6003.

#### Hite *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            College of Information and Cyberspace
                    National Defense University
                CIC
        Search
                    Search CIC:
                        Search
                Search CIC:
                    Search
    Home

    About 
        Mission & Vision

    Faculty & Staff

    Fact Sheet

    Alumni

    Internships

    FAQ

    Admissions 
        Eligibility Requirements

    Admissions Calendar

    Application Instructions

    Apply Online

    International Students

    Academics 
        Graduate Catalog

    M.S. in Strategic Information and Cyberspace Studies
        
        JPME Master's Degree

    Cyber Workforce Master's Degree (Part Time)

    Leadership Development Programs

    Graduate Certificates

    Academic Partners

    Current Students 
        JPME II  Incoming Students

    LDP Incoming Students

    Student Registration

    Bring Your Own Device

    IA Compliance

    Completion Procedures / Order Transcripts

    Student Services and Resources

    Events
    
        Cyber Beacon

    Cyber PME Colloquium

    Hopper Award

    Lecture Series

    CYBERCOM Symposium

    NEWS

    UC2
    
        About

    Events

    Work With Us

    Center for Cybersecurity
    
        About

    Cybersecurity Center POC

    Cybersecurity Supporting Faculty

    CAE-CDE CISO Certificate Program

    Cybersecurity Trending News

    Cyber Labs
        
        Ethical Hacking

    Critical Infrastructure - SCADA

    Cyber Exercises
        
        Tabletop Exercise

    Cyber Competitions

    Cyber Resources and Awareness

    Stakeholder / Industry Advisory Council

    Contact 
        Contact Us

    Directions

    Access to Ft. McNair

    Map of Ft. McNair  Home
  NEWS
  News & Announcements
 News & Announcements Download
 Details
 Share
 News
 #CYBERBEACON
 For more information clickHERE
 SHARE
 PRINT
 National Defense University


College of Information and Cyberspace

300 Fifth Ave., Bldg. 62
Fort Lesley J. McNair
Washington, DC 20319-5066

202-685-6300
                    Stay Connected
                
                
                DOD Privacy & Security
 DOD Links Disclaimer
 DOD Social Media Policy
 DOD Web Policy
 FOIA
 NDU System of Records Notice
 NDU Privacy & Security Notice
 No FEAR Act
 Open GOV
 Plain Writing Act
 Section 508
 Small Business Act
 USA.gov
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF **

**THE      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

**(SUBSECTIONS      (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, **
**CHAPTER      63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)**

|                                   |                                                                                                                                                                                             |                                                         |
|----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                   | **China                Mobility Solutions, Inc.**                                                                                                                                                |
|                              |                                                                                                                                                                                        |                                                    |
| Date: May                21, 2007 | By:                                                                                                                                                                                    | /s/ Xiao-qing                Du     |
|                                   | Xiao-qing                  Du                                                                                                                                                                    |
|                                   | Title President,                Chairman of the Board, and  Chief                Executive Officer (Principal Executive                Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)  |
#### § 32.6533 Testing expense.

This account shall include costs incurred in testing telecommunications facilities from a testing facility (test desk or other testing system) to determine the condition of plant on either a routine basis or prior to assignment of the facilities; receiving, recording and analyzing trouble reports; testing to determine the nature and location of reported trouble condition; and dispatching repair persons or otherwise initiating corrective action. (Note also § 32.5999(b)(3) of this subpart.)
# Comments on: Notice of New Mandate Format
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ALE XANDER HOLLAND

,

Appellant

,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 9

- 00 2 49

- C R

Appeal from the

299 th District Court

of Tra vis , Texas

(TC# D

- 1

- DC

- 19

- 904012 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s third m otion for extension of time within which to

file the brief until April 1 6

, 20 20

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

F ILE THE APPEL L ANT ’ S BR IEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Dal Ruggles , the Appellant’s attorney, prepare the

Appellant ’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before April 1 6 , 20 20

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 1 8 th day of March , 20 20

.

PER CURIAM

Before Alley , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7469

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

STEPHEN D. SATCHER,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District 

Judge. (8:00-cr-00105-AW-1; 8:12-cv-01679-AW)

Submitted: November 21, 2013 Decided: November 26, 2013

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen D. Satcher, Appellant Pro Se. Odessa Palmer Jackson, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Deborah A. Johnston, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Stephen D. Satcher seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 

2013) motion as untimely. We dismiss the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. 

When the United States or its officer or agency is a 

party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty 

days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or 

order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court 

extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or 

reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he 

timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a 

jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 

214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket 

on November 29, 2012. The notice of appeal was filed on 

September 12, 2013.*

 Because Satcher failed to file a timely 

notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the 

appeal period, we deny Satcher’s motion for a certificate of 

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

 * For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date 

appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could 

have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to 

the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 

(1988). 
3

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-5040

_____________________________

JUSTIN GANDER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.

Michael Flowers, Judge.

May 2, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, BILBREY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Justin Gander, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4635

To extend the Export Administration Act of 1979.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 23, 1994

Mr. HAMILTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Foreign Affairs

A BILL

To extend the Export Administration Act of 1979.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 20 of the Export Administration Act of 1979

4 (50 U.S.C. App. 2419) is amended by striking ‘‘June 30,

5 1994’’ and inserting ‘‘August 20, 1994’’.

Æ
No. 11-8752.

#### Covarrubias *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 5th. App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 1, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130150 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

GEORGE H. GOLDSTONE,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130150 

 COA: 262831 

Oakland CC: 04-060611-CZ 

BLOOMFIELD TOWNSHIP PUBLIC LIBRARY, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On October 11, 2006, the Court heard oral argument on the application for leave to 

appeal the November 8, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, 

the application is again considered, and it is GRANTED. MCR 7.302(G)(1). The 

Attorney General, the Michigan Association of Counties, the Michigan Municipal 

League, and the Michigan Library Association are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. 

Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this 

case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae. 

t1025 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 1, 2006 

 Clerk
NO. 07-11-0432-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL C JUNE 26, 2012

__________________ ____________ BRIANN NICOLE WILSON, APPELLANT
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

__________________ _______________ FROM THE 181 ST DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY; NO. 19411-B; HONORABLE JOHN BOARD, JUDGE

__________________ _____________ Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Briann Nicole Wils on, perfected this appeal from the trial court's judgment revoking her community supervisi on which had been grant ed for the offense of tampering with evidence. 1 Punishment was assessed at eight years confinement and a $500 fine.

1 Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 37.10 (West 2011).2 Pending before this Court is Appellant's Motion to Dismiss Appeal in which she represents she wishes to withdraw her notice of appeal. As required by Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the motion is signed by Appellant and her attorney. No decision of this Court havi ng been delivered, the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed. No mo tion for rehearing will be enter tained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

Patrick A. Pirtle Justice

Do not publish.
§ 54.1012 Geographic areas eligible for support. ( a ) 5G Fund support will be made available for geographic areas identified as eligible by public notice.
( b ) Coverage units for purposes of conducting competitive bidding and disbursing support based on square kilometers will be identified by public notice for each area eligible for support.
No. 11-8753.

#### Cochran *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist., Div. 1. Certiorari denied.
§ 64.1602 Restrictions on use and sale of telephone subscriber information provided pursuant to automatic number identification or charge number services. ( a ) Any common carrier providing Automatic Number Identification or charge number services on interstate calls to any person shall provide such services under a contract or tariff containing telephone subscriber information requirements that comply with this subpart. Such requirements shall: ( 1 ) Permit such person to use the telephone number and billing information for billing and collection, routing, screening, and completion of the originating telephone subscriber's call or transaction, or for services directly related to the originating telephone subscriber's call or transaction;
( 2 ) Prohibit such person from reusing or selling the telephone number or billing information without first ( i ) Notifying the originating telephone subscriber and,
( ii ) Obtaining the affirmative consent of such subscriber for such reuse or sale; and,
( 3 ) Prohibit such person from disclosing, except as permitted by paragraphs (a) (1) and (2) of this section, any information derived from the automatic number identification or charge number service for any purpose other than ( i ) Performing the services or transactions that are the subject of the originating telephone subscriber's call,
( ii ) Ensuring network performance security, and the effectiveness of call delivery,
( iii ) Compiling, using, and disclosing aggregate information, and
( iv ) Complying with applicable law or legal process.
( b ) The requirements imposed under paragraph (a) of the section shall not prevent a person to whom automatic number identification or charge number services are provided from using ( 1 ) The telephone number and billing information provided pursuant to such service, and
( 2 ) Any information derived from the automatic number identification or charge number service, or from the analysis of the characteristics of a telecommunications transmission, to offer a product or service that is directly related to the products or services previously acquired by that customer from such person. Use of such information is subject to the requirements of 47 CFR 64.1200 and 64.1504(c).
[60 FR 29490, June 5, 1995]
§ 61.192 Contents of supplement announcing suspension. ( a ) A supplement announcing a suspension by the Commission must specify the term of suspension imposed by the Commission.
( b ) A supplement announcing a suspension of either an entire tariff or a part of a tariff publication, must specify the applicable tariff publication effective during the period of suspension.
#### § 76.1210 Effect on other rules.

Nothing in this subpart affects § 64.702(d) of the Commission's regulations or other Commission regulations governing interconnection and competitive provision of customer premises equipment used in connection with basic common carrier communications services.
§ 73.688 Indicating instruments. ( a ) Each TV broadcast station shall be equipped with indicating instruments which conform with the specifications described in § 73.1215 for measuring the operating parameters of the last radio stage of the transmitter, and with such other instruments as are necessary for the proper adjustment, operation, and maintenance of the transmitting system.
( b ) The function of each instrument shall be clearly and permanently shown on the instrument itself or on the panel immediately adjacent thereto.
( c ) In the event that any one of these indicating instruments becomes defective, when no substitute which conforms with the required specifications is available, the station may be operated without the defective instrument pending its repair or replacement for a period not in excess of 60 days without further authority of the FCC, provided that: ( 1 ) If the defective instrument is the transmission line meter used for determining the output power by the direct method, the operating power shall be determined or maintained by the indirect method whenever possible or by using the operating parameters of the last radio stage of the transmitter during the time the station is operated without the transmission line meter.
( 2 ) If conditions beyond the control of the licensee prevent the restoration of the meter to service within the above allowed period, informal request in accordance with § 73.3549 may be filed for such additional time as may be required to complete repairs of the defective instrument.
[41 FR 36818, Sept. 1, 1976, as amended at 48 FR 38480, Aug. 24, 1983; 49 FR 50048, Dec. 26, 1984; 50 FR 26568, June 27, 1985; 80 FR 53750, Sept. 8, 2015; 89 FR 7253, Feb. 1, 2024 ]
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4731 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4731

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
                coastwise trade for the vessel ISABELLE.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 12, 1994

   Mr. Reed introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
                coastwise trade for the vessel ISABELLE.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the 
Act of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106 of title 
46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue a 
certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for 
employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel ISABELLE (United 
States official number 600655).
                                 <all>
```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"21-1969: UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS v. L'OREAL S.A. [OPINION], Precedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"SkDbhTlFaF\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/06-13-2022-21-1969-university-of-massachusetts-v-loreal-sa-opinion-21-1969-opinion-6-13-2022_1964183\/\">21-1969: UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS v. L’OREAL S.A. [OPINION], Precedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/06-13-2022-21-1969-university-of-massachusetts-v-loreal-sa-opinion-21-1969-opinion-6-13-2022_1964183\/embed\/#?secret=SkDbhTlFaF\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“21-1969: UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS v. L’OREAL S.A. [OPINION], Precedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"SkDbhTlFaF\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"OPINION Posted: UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS v. L’OREAL S.A. [OPINION](pdf) Appeal Number: 21-1969 Origin: DCT Precedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}