alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.2




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                18 U.S.C. S 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Scientific Energy, Inc on Form 10-QSB
for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission  on the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Jana  Meyers,  Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
S 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



/s/ Jana Meyer
Jana Meyer
Secretary/Treasurer and Director
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
August 12, 2002
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with this Quarterly Report of HIV-VAC Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the year period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin Murray,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the
         period ending December 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all material
         respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HIV-VAC
         Inc.

Dated: September 30, 2011

/s/ Kevin Murray
Kevin Murray
Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                   JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                                      JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                        DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                                   946884
<SECURITIES>                                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                        1027079
<PP&E>                                                                   163531
<DEPRECIATION>                                                           (25274)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                          1314368
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                     38354
<BONDS>                                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                                  13458
<OTHER-SE>                                                              1262556
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                            1314368
<SALES>                                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                              0
<CGS>                                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                            703674
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                          681785
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                      681785
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                             681785
<EPS-BASIC>                                                               (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                             (0.05)



</TABLE>
No. 11-9818.

#### Odom *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### § 15.9 Prohibition against eavesdropping.

Except for the operations of law enforcement officers conducted under lawful authority, no person shall use, either directly or indirectly, a device operated pursuant to the provisions of this part for the purpose of overhearing or recording the private conversations of others unless such use is authorized by all of the parties engaging in the conversation.
No. 10-10801.

#### Bivona *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Chief Information Officer 

Graduate Certificate

The National Defense University (NDU) College of Information and Cyberspace (CIC) CIO Program is 

the recognized leader in graduate education for Federal CIO leaders and agency personnel. It addresses 

the Clinger-Cohen Act and other relevant legislation mandates as well as standard practices for 

interpretation and implementation of these legislative actions. It also directly aligns with the Federal CIO 

Council-defined CIO competencies. CIO Program graduates earn a certificate that recognizes they have 

earned an education in Federal CIO competencies. The CIO Certificate is organized around subject areas 

directly related to CIO competencies identified by the Federal CIO Council.

Important Facts:

• Tuition-Free for DoD Personnel 

(Military and Civilian)

• Fully Remote and Part-Time

• Self-Nominated

Minimum Admissions Eligibility Criteria:

• Bachelor’s Degree (3.0 GPA minimum)

• Federal civil service pay grade GS-13 or equivalent 

and above

• Miliary:

•Enlisted: E-7 and above

•Chief Warrant Officer: CW3 and above

•Officer: O-4 and above

Courses Required (3 credit hours each)

CIC-6211 Cyber Fundamentals

CIC-6415 Strategic Information Technology 

Acquisition

CIC-6443 Emerging and Disruptive

Technologies

CIC-6303 CIO 2.0 Roles and 

Responsibilities

CIC-6328 Strategic Performance and Budget 

Management

For more information refer to: 

Website: cic.ndu.edu

Phone number: 202-685-6300

Email: cicoss@ndu.edu

Attend our Monthly Virtual Open House for prospective students on the 4th Thursday of every month @ 1pm – 2pm EST 

https://us.bbcollab.com/guest/886062331bd3403f8bd9a2ac591ddc3a or +1-571-392-7650 PIN: 125 656 9347

Successful CIO graduates will be able to: 

 • Leverage CIO policy and organization 

competencies to lead within and acrossfederal 

organizational boundaries by linking critical 

decisions regarding resources, people, processes, 

andtechnologiestomission performance.

• Balance continuity and change in the development, 

implementation, and evaluation of government 

information resources and management

strategies and policies while meeting legislative 

and executive mandates.

• Demonstrate abilities to construct and implement 

mission-aligned information and communication 

technology strategies [including gathering, 

analyzing, and reporting data; making decisions; 

implementing decisions; and evaluating 

organizational performance] in an ethicalmanner.

• Communicate at the strategic level 

demonstrating command of the topic, logical 

organization, compelling argument, and 

excellence in English grammar and syntax.
§ 54.423 Budget. ( a ) *Amount of the annual budget.* The initial annual budget on federal universal support for the Lifeline program shall be $2.25 billion. ( 1 ) *Inflation increase.* In funding year 2016 and subsequent funding years, the $2.25 billion funding cap on federal universal service support for Lifeline shall be automatically increased annually to take into account increases in the rate of inflation as calculated in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
( 2 ) *Increase calculation.* To measure increases in the rate of inflation for the purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, the Commission shall use the Consumer Price Index for all items from the Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. To compute the annual increase as required by this paragraph (a), the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index from the previous year will be used. For instance, the annual increase in the Consumer Price Index from 2015 to 2016 would be used for the 2017 funding year. The increase shall be rounded to the nearest 0.1 percent by rounding 0.05 percent and above to the next higher 0.1 percent and otherwise rounding to the next lower 0.1 percent. This percentage increase shall be added to the amount of the annual funding cap from the previous funding year. If the yearly average Consumer Price Index decreases or stays the same, the annual funding cap shall remain the same as the previous year.
( 3 ) The Wireline Competition Bureau shall issue a public notice on or before July 31 containing the results of the calculations described in § 54.403(a)(2) and setting the budget for the upcoming year beginning on January 1.
( b ) If spending in the Lifeline program meets or exceeds 90 percent of the Lifeline budget in a calendar year, the Wireline Competition Bureau shall prepare a report evaluating program disbursements and describing the reasons for the program's growth along with any other information relevant to the operation of the Lifeline program. The Bureau shall submit the report to the Commission by July 31st of the following year.
[81 FR 33095, May 24, 2016] Effective Date Note
Effective Date Note: At 81 FR 33095, May 24, 2016, § 54.423 was added. This section contains information collection and recordkeeping requirements and will not become effective until approval has been given by the Office of Management and Budget.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Republic Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), I, William R. Falzone, Executive Vice President and Treasurer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The
Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: March 8, 2004



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|/s/ William R. Falzone                
|William R. Falzone                    
|Executive Vice President and Treasurer
#### David Auclair *et ux vs.*E. J. Maurice.

FEBRUARY 19, 1947.

Present : Flynn, C. J., Moss, Capotosto, Baker and Condon, JJ.

*351Capotosto, J.

This is an action of trespass and ejectment which was tried before a justice of the superior court sitting with a jury and resulted in a verdict for the plaintiffs. The case is before us on defendant’s exceptions to the denial of his motion for a new trial and to other rulings made by the trial justice during the trial.

We have examined these exceptions and, excluding the exception to the admission in evidence of the notice to quit, we find them all to be without merit. Before the plaintiffs' could prevail in the instant case it was necessary for them to establish by legal evidence that a notice to quit the premises was given the defendant in accordance with the statute. Such a notice in writing with the return of service by a constable endorsed thereon was admitted in evidence, over defendant’s objection, without any testimony from the officer that the notice had in fact been served on the defendant. This notice was offered and admitted in evidence, apparently in the belief that the officer’s return thereon was the same as an officer’s return on a writ or other process which speaks for itself and ordinarily cannot be contradicted.

The plaintiffs here were bound to prove that the notice required by the statute was given to the defendant. For such proof they relied entirely on the mere return of the officer on the notice to quit without any testimony from him as to the fact of its service on the defendant. This was error, unless there was other competent evidence in the record to make such proof unnecessary or merely cumulative. We have searched the transcript for any evidence that the notice had been served but have found none. In this situation the admission of the notice to quit as an exhibit, without competent proof of its service, was prejudicial error.

*352
      *Joseph Janas,*for plaintiffs.

*George Triedman, John M. Booth,*for defendant.

The defendant’s exception to the admission in evidence of the notice to quit is therefore sustained on the sole ground herein mentioned; all of his other exceptions are overruled; and the case is remitted to the superior court for a new trial.
No. 10-10845.

#### Henslee *v.*Simmons et al.

C. A. 4th ,Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-9459.

#### Opong-Mensah *v.*Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board et al.

Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8.
No. 11-5420.

#### Stanley *v.*Cox, Director, Nevada Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
I, Michael P. Huseby, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CC VHoldings, LLC and CC V Holdings Finance, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrants as of, and for,the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants’ other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrants and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrants,including their consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) [Reserved];  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrants’ disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrants’ internal control over financialreporting that occurred during theregistrants’ most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrants’ fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrants’ internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants’ other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrants’auditors and the audit committee of the registrants’ board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrants’ ability to record,process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrants’internal control over financial reporting.
Date: August 13, 2004 /s/ Michael P. HusebyMichael P. HusebyChief Financial Officer
No. 11-5651.

#### Marroquin *v.*Curry, Warden, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 109-45.304-50 Processing bids and awarding of contracts.

The procedures established in 48 CFR 14.4 and 48 CFR 914.4 shall be made applicable to the execution, receipt, safeguarding, opening, abstraction, and evaluation of bids and awarding contracts, except that in evaluating bids and awarding contracts, disposal under conditions most advantageous to the Government based on high bids received shall be the determining factor.
#### § 64.801 Purpose.

Pursuant to section 401 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, Public Law 92-225, these rules prescribe the general terms and conditions for the extension of unsecured credit by a communication common carrier to a candidate or person on behalf of such candidate for Federal office.
```

EXHIBIT 32.2

                           NATIONAL AUTO CREDIT, INC.
                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

I, Robert V. Cuddihy, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of National Auto Credit,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Registrant"), in connection with the
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), do hereby represent, warrant and certify pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

/s/ Robert V. Cuddihy, Jr.
--------------------------------------------
Name: Robert V. Cuddihy, Jr.
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:  May 11, 2005
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
audited consolidated balance sheet as pf September 30, 2000 and the consolidated
statement of operations for the year ended September 30, 2000 of Audio Visual
Services Corporation as set forth in this Form 10-K and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         1005015
<NAME>                        Audio Visual Services Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1000
<CURRENCY>                                         USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              OCT-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,272
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,895
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,310
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                63,639
<PP&E>                                         145,431
<DEPRECIATION>                                  77,328
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 414,289
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           52,506
<BONDS>                                           0000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           246
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,308
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   414,289
<SALES>                                        420,414
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               420,414
<CGS>                                          349,221
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   65,905
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,005
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              46,308
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (55,025)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (340)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (55,365)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (56,771)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0000
<CHANGES>                                         0000
<NET-INCOME>                                  (112,136)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (4.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (4.70)



</TABLE>
No. 11-9080.

#### Zack *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis [ante,*p. 936] denied.