alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 74
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 74 appear at 64 FR 4055, Jan. 27, 1999.

§ 74.1283 Station identification. ( a ) The call sign of an FM broadcast translator station will consist of the initial letter K or W followed by the channel number assigned to the translator and two letters. The use of the initial letter will generally conform to the pattern used in the broadcast service. The two letter combinations following the channel number will be assigned in order and requests for the assignment of particular combinations of letters will not be considered.
( b ) The call sign of an FM booster station or LPFM booster will consist of the call sign of the primary station followed by the letters “FM” or “LP” and the number of the booster station being authorized, e.g., WFCCFM-1 or WFCCLP-1.
( c ) A translator station authorized under this subpart shall be identified by one of the following methods. ( 1 ) By arranging for the primary station whose station is being rebroadcast to identify the translator station by call sign and location. Three such identifications shall be made during each day: once between 7 a.m. and 9 a.m., once between 12:55 p.m. and 1:05 p.m. and once between 4 p.m. and 6 p.m. Stations which do not begin their broadcast before 9 a.m. shall make their first identification at the beginning of their broadcast days. The licensee of an FM translator whose station identification is made by the primary station must arrange for the primary station licensee to keep in its file, and to make available to FCC personnel, the translator's call letters and location, giving the name, address and telephone number of the licensee or his service representative to be contacted in the event of malfunction of the translator. It shall be the responsibility of the translator licensee to furnish current information to the primary station licensee for this purpose.
( 2 ) By transmitting the call sign in International Morse Code at least once each hour. Transmitters of FM broadcast translator stations of more than 1 watt transmitter output power must be equipped with an automatic keying device that will transmit the call sign at least once each hour, unless there is in effect a firm agreement with the translator's primary station as provided in § 74.1283(c)(1) of this section. Transmission of the call sign can be accomplished by: ( i ) Frequency shifting key; the carrier shift shall not be less than 5 kHz nor greater than 25 kHz.
( ii ) Amplitude modulation of the FM carrier of at least 30 percent modulation. The audio frequency tone use shall not be within 200 hertz of the Emergency Broadcast System Attention signal alerting frequencies.
( d ) FM broadcast booster stations shall be identified by their primary stations, by the broadcasting of the primary station's call signs and location, in accordance with the provisions of § 73.1201 of this chapter.
( e ) The Commission may, in its discretion, specify other methods of identification.
[55 FR 50699, Dec. 10, 1990, as amended at 85 FR 35574, June 11, 2020]
-90 -88 -86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

34 36 38 40 42 44



### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/22 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 22 Jun 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            College of Information and Cyberspace
                    National Defense University
                CIC
        Search
                    Search CIC:
                        Search
                Search CIC:
                    Search
    Home

    About 
        Mission & Vision

    Faculty & Staff

    Fact Sheet

    Alumni

    Internships

    FAQ

    Admissions 
        Eligibility Requirements

    Admissions Calendar

    Application Instructions

    Apply Online

    International Students

    Academics 
        Graduate Catalog

    M.S. in Strategic Information and Cyberspace Studies
        
        JPME Master's Degree

    Cyber Workforce Master's Degree (Part Time)

    Leadership Development Programs

    Graduate Certificates

    Academic Partners

    Current Students 
        JPME II  Incoming Students

    LDP Incoming Students

    Student Registration

    Bring Your Own Device

    IA Compliance

    Completion Procedures / Order Transcripts

    Student Services and Resources

    Events
    
        Cyber Beacon

    Cyber PME Colloquium

    Hopper Award

    Lecture Series

    CYBERCOM Symposium

    NEWS

    UC2
    
        About

    Events

    Work With Us

    Center for Cybersecurity
    
        About

    Cybersecurity Center POC

    Cybersecurity Supporting Faculty

    CAE-CDE CISO Certificate Program

    Cybersecurity Trending News

    Cyber Labs
        
        Ethical Hacking

    Critical Infrastructure - SCADA

    Cyber Exercises
        
        Tabletop Exercise

    Cyber Competitions

    Cyber Resources and Awareness

    Stakeholder / Industry Advisory Council

    Contact 
        Contact Us

    Directions

    Access to Ft. McNair

    Map of Ft. McNair  Download
 Details
 Share
 News
 CYBERCOM Symposium
 On 17 November 2022, U.S. Cyber Command and the National Defense University (NDU) College of Information and Cyberspace (CIC) are co-hosting a day of academic presentations and panel discussions to consider the role of cyberspace operations in integrated deterrence during competition, crisis and conflict to create tactical, operational, and strategic effects to enable Joint Force success. The attendees of this event will include DoD leaders, policy makers, and academic experts. **FOR REGISTRATION CLICK HERE** **FIND THE AGENDA HERE**
 SHARE
 PRINT
 Previous Story
 Next Story
 National Defense University


College of Information and Cyberspace

300 Fifth Ave., Bldg. 62
Fort Lesley J. McNair
Washington, DC 20319-5066

202-685-6300
                    Stay Connected
                DOD Privacy & Security
 DOD Links Disclaimer
 DOD Social Media Policy
 DOD Web Policy
 FOIA
 NDU System of Records Notice
 NDU Privacy & Security Notice
 No FEAR Act
 Open GOV
 Plain Writing Act
 Section 508
 Small Business Act
 USA.gov
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
# Fourth Court of Appeal **s**

**San Antonio, Texas**

April 20, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00009

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF D.R.B. and E.B.,

From the 57th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1988

- CI

- 00019 Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr. , Judge Presidi ng



### ORDER

The reporter’s record was originally due February 10, 2022

, but was not filed. On February 10, 2022 , court reporter Maria Fattahi filed a notification of late record, requesting an extension until March 14, 2022. We granted court reporter Fattahi’s request and ordered her to file her portion of the reporter’s record by March 14, 2022. Fattahi did not file her portion of the reporter’s record by this date. On March 28 , 2022, we ordered Fattahi to file her portion of the reporter’s record by April 7, 2022. On March 29, 2022, Fattahi filed a notification of late record, stating that the reporter’s record was not filed because appellant had failed to pay or make

arrangem ents to pay the court reporter’s fee for preparing the record and that appellant was not entitled to appeal without paying the fee.

We therefore ORDER that appellant provide written proof to this court that either (1) the reporter’s fee has been paid o r arrangements have been made to pay the reporter’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s fee within 10 days from the date of

this order. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, appellant’s brief will be due within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, and the court will consider only those issues or points raised in appellant’s brief that do not require court reporter Fattahi’s portion of the reporter’s record for a decision. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(c).

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 20th day of April, 2022

.___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
No. 11-9743.

#### Milan *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### AMERISTAR JET CHARTER, INC., Plaintiff—Appellee—Cross Appellant, v. SIGNAL COMPOSITES, INC., Etc.; et al., Defendants, Susanne STEHR, Defendant—Appellant—Cross Appellee.

No. 02-10977.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 24, 2004.

Craig Alan Morgan, Kurt Howard Kuhn, Assistant Solicitor General, Brown MeCar-roll, Austin, TX, Richard A. Illmer, Brown McCarroll, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee-Cross-Appellant.

Terri Ann Law, Sherman Oaks, CA, for Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees.

Before KING, Chief Judge, and BENAVIDES and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

Susanne Stehr appeals from the district court’s judgment finding her liable to Am-eristar Jet Charter, Inc. for conspiracy to commit fraud and finding her jointly and severally liable to Ameristar for $432,099.60 in compensatory damages. Ameristar cross-appeals the damages award. After reviewing the pleadings and hearing oral argument, we affirm the judgment of the district court for the following reasons:

> 1. The pretrial order provided adequate notice to Stehr of Ameristar’s claim for conspiracy to commit fraud. *See Thrift v. Hubbard,*44 F.3d 348, 356 (5th Cir.1995) (“Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a pleading, or pretrial order, need not specify in exact detail every possible theory of recovery — it must only ‘give the defendant fair notice of what the plaintiffs claim is and the grounds upon which it rests.’ ”) (quoting *Conley v. Gibson,*355 U.S. 41, 47, 78 S.Ct. 99, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957)).

> 2. The district court did not clearly err in concluding that Durrani acted in a dual capacity on behalf of Signal Composites, Inc. d/b/a Signal Aerospace (“Signal”) and Aerospace Logistics. *See*Fed. R. Civ. P. 52(a). The district court’s finding is supported by evidence in the record that Durrani worked for Signal as a business consultant and that he was paid consulting fees through Aerospace Logistics.

> *833. There was sufficient evidence presented at trial for the district court to reasonably conclude that Stehr knowingly participated in the conspiracy to commit fraud. The district court’s finding is not clearly erroneous. *See id.*

> 4. The district court did not clearly err in awarding damages. The district court’s calculation of benefit-of-the-bargain damages is plausible in light of conflicting evidence in the record as to the value of the liners as represented. *See St. Martin v. Mobil Exploration & Producing U.S. Inc.,*224 F.3d 402, 410 (5th Cir.2000).

For these reasons, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
# Mr. James Churbuck

### Associate Professor of Practice

### Disinformation and Influence, Arms Control Norms

### 

### Areas of Interest:

Autonomous systems, disinformation and influence, arms control norms

### Academic Credentials:

B.S., U.S. Naval AcademyM.S., Industrial College of the Armed Forces

### Relevant Professional Experience: 

Mr. Churbuck served as a Joint Staff Political-Military Planner, Combating Weapons of Mass Destruction Division, Deputy Director, War on Terrorism. He provided military advice to the National Security Council in formulating U.S. Policy on WMD treaties and non-proliferation regimes and represented the Joint Staff on U.S. Delegations to the United Nations, International Atomic Energy Agency, Organization for the Prevention of Chemical Weapons, and to the Biological Weapons Convention. He is practiced in Operational Risk Management, having implemented the start of a formal ORM program in the early 90s. He also has extensive experience as an information systems officer and as a contingency planner.

 

### Scholarship:

Mr. Churbuck has a longstanding interest in crafting national security policy, critical infrastructures, and cyber security. Because of the implications on public policy as well as his fascination with the underlying engineering, he actively tracks emerging technologies with emphasis on mobile converged devices and on geo-location services.

### Courses:

Information Assurance and Critical Infrastructure Protection (AII)Approval to Operate (ATO)Continuity of Operations (COO)Enterprise Security and Risk Management (ESS)

 

Check out his introduction video here →
§ 51.603 Resale obligation of all local exchange carriers. ( a ) A LEC shall make its telecommunications services available for resale to requesting telecommunications carriers on terms and conditions that are reasonable and non-discriminatory.
( b ) A LEC must provide services to requesting telecommunications carriers for resale that are equal in quality, subject to the same conditions, and provided within the same provisioning time intervals that the LEC provides these services to others, including end users.
###### Editorial Note on Part 36

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 74 FR 23956, May 22, 2009, 77 FR 30411, May 23, 2012, 82 FR 25538, June 2, 2017, and corrected at 83 FR 4153, Jan. 30, 2018. Nomenclature changes to part 36 also appear at 83 FR 63587, Dec. 11, 2018, and 84 FR 4360, Feb. 15, 2019.

#### § 36.372 Marketing—Account 6610.

The expenses in this account are apportioned among the operations on the basis of an analysis of current billing for a representative period, excluding current billing on behalf of others and billing in connection with intercompany settlements. Effective July 1, 2001, through December 31, 2024, all study areas shall apportion expenses in this account among the jurisdictions using the analysis during the twelve-month period ending December 31, 2000.

[79 FR 36238, June 26, 2014]
§ 80.102 Radiotelephone station identification. This section applies to all stations using telephony which are subject to this part. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, stations must give the call sign in English. Identification must be made: ( 1 ) At the beginning and end of each communication with any other station.
( 2 ) At 15 minute intervals when transmission is sustained for more than 15 minutes. When public correspondence is being exchanged with a ship or aircraft station, the identification may be deferred until the completion of the communications.
( b ) Private coast stations located at drawbridges and transmitting on the navigation frequency 156.650 MHz may identify by use of the name of the bridge in lieu of the call sign.
( c ) Ship stations transmitting on any authorized VHF bridge-to-bridge channel may be identified by the name of the ship in lieu of the call sign.
( d ) Ship stations operating in a vessel traffic service system or on a waterway under the control of a U.S. Government agency or a foreign authoriy, when communicating with such an agency or authority may be identified by the name of the ship in lieu of the call sign, or as directed by the agency or foreign authority.
( e ) Voice traffic in the INMARSAT system is closed to other parties except the two stations involved and the identification is done automatically with the establishment of the call. Therefore, it is not necessary for these stations to identify themselves periodically during the communication. For terrestrial systems using DSC to establish radiotelephone communications, the identification is made at the beginning of the call. In these cases, both parties must identify themselves by ship name, call sign or MMSI at least once every 15 minutes during radiotelephone communications.
( f ) VHF public coast stations licensed to serve a predetermined geographic service area are not required to provide station identification under this section. A site-based VHF public coast station may identify by means of the approximate geographic location of the station or the area it serves when it is the only VHF public coast station serving the location or there will be no conflict with the identification of any other station.
[51 FR 31213, Sept. 2, 1986, as amended at 52 FR 35244, Sept. 18, 1987; 68 FR 46961, Aug. 7, 2003; 69 FR 64671, Nov. 8, 2004]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,756
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  417,419
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,053
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          15,488
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,264
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 451,781
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         1,492
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     228,056
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   451,781
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                63,872
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,501
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,436
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                11,005
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,713
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 40,217
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,008
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             26,209
<DISCONTINUED>                                  (6,908)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,301
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 74
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 74 appear at 64 FR 4055, Jan. 27, 1999.

§ 74.1281 Station records. ( a ) The licensee of a station authorized under this Subpart shall maintain adequate station records, including the current instrument of authorization, official correspondence with the FCC, maintenance records, contracts, permission for rebroadcasts, and other pertinent documents.
( b ) Entries required by § 17.49 of this chapter concerning any observed or otherwise known extinguishment or improper functioning of a tower light: ( 1 ) The nature of such extinguishment or improper functioning.
( 2 ) The date and time the extinguishment of improper operation was observed or otherwise noted.
( 3 ) The date, time and nature of adjustments, repairs or replacements made.
( c ) The station records shall be maintained for inspection at a residence, office, or public building, place of business, or other suitable place, in one of the communities of license of the translator or booster, except that the station records of a booster or translator licensed to the licensee of the primary station may be kept at the same place where the primary station records are kept. The station records shall be made available upon request to any authorized representative of the Commission.
( d ) Station logs and records shall be retained for a period of two years.
[48 FR 44807, Sept. 30, 1983, as amended at 84 FR 2759, Feb. 8, 2019]
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4628 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4628

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to extend 
 certain provisions relating to verification of wages and issuance of 
  duty refund certificates to insular producers in the United States 
   Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 22, 1994

 Mr. de Lugo introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to extend 
 certain provisions relating to verification of wages and issuance of 
  duty refund certificates to insular producers in the United States 
   Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF VERIFICATION AND CERTIFICATE ISSUANCE 
              PROVISIONS.

    Additional U.S. Note 5(h)(i) to Chapter 91 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``and before 
January 1, 1995,'' and inserting ``and before January 1, 2007,''.

SEC. 2. CIVIL PENALTY FOR IMPORTING MERCHANDISE WITH A COUNTERFEIT 
              MARK.

    Section 1526 of title 19, United States Code, is amended by adding 
a subsection (f) to read as follows:
    ``(f) Any person who directs, assists financially or otherwise, or 
is in any way concerned with the importation of merchandise seized 
pursuant to paragraph (e) shall be subject to a civil fine. For the 
first such seizure, the fine shall be equal to the value that the 
merchandise would have had if it were genuine. For the second seizure 
and thereafter, the fine shall be equal to twice the value that the 
merchandise would have had if it were genuine.''.

                                 <all>
```
No. 11-5410.

#### Perez *v.*Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.
Schedule to Form of Executive Change in Control Agreement



 Exhibit 10.2(e)-2 
 Schedule to Form of Executive Change in Control Agreement between 
 Ryerson Inc. and the following parties:

 James M. Delaney 
 Stephen E.
Makarewicz