alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 25.164 Milestones. ( a ) The recipient of an initial license for a GSO space station, other than a SDARS space station, granted on or after August 27, 2003, must launch the space station, position it in its assigned orbital location, and operate it in accordance with the station authorization no later than five years after the grant of the license, unless a different schedule is established by this chapter or the Commission.
( b ) ( 1 ) The recipient of an initial authorization for an NGSO satellite system, other than an SDARS system, must launch 50 percent of the maximum number of space stations authorized for service, place them in their assigned orbits, and operate them in accordance with the station authorization no later than 6 years after the grant of the authorization, unless a different schedule is established by Title 47, Chapter I. This paragraph does not apply to replacement NGSO space stations as defined in § 25.165(e).
( 2 ) A licensee that satisfies the requirement in paragraph (b)(1) of this section must launch the remaining space stations necessary to complete its authorized service constellation, place them in their assigned orbits, and operate each of them in accordance with the authorization no later than nine years after the grant of the authorization.
( c ) - ( e ) [Reserved]
( f ) A licensee subject to the requirements in paragraph (a) or (b) of this section must either demonstrate compliance with the applicable requirement or notify the Commission in writing that the requirement was not met, within 15 days after the specified deadline. Compliance with a milestone requirement in paragraph (a) or (b) of this section may be demonstrated by certifying pursuant to § 25.121(d) that the space station(s) in question, has, or have, been launched and placed in the authorized orbital location or non-geostationary orbit(s) and that in-orbit operation of the space station or stations has been tested and found to be consistent with the terms of the authorization.
( g ) Licensees of satellite systems that include both NGSO satellites and GSO satellites must meet the requirement in paragraph (a) of this section with respect to the GSO satellite(s) and the applicable requirements in paragraph (b) of this section with respect to the NGSO satellites.
( h ) In cases where the Commission grants a satellite authorization in different stages, such as a license for a satellite system using feeder links or inter-satellite links, the earliest of the milestone schedules will be applied to the entire satellite system.
[68 FR 51507, Aug. 27, 2003, as amended at 69 FR 51587, Aug. 20, 2004; 79 FR 8320, Feb. 12, 2014; 81 FR 55334, Aug. 18, 2016; 82 FR 59985, Dec. 18, 2017; 86 FR 49489, Sept. 3, 2021]
§ 73.1540 Carrier frequency measurements. ( a ) The carrier frequency of each AM and FM station shall be measured or determined as often as necessary to ensure that they are maintained within the prescribed tolerances.
( b ) In measuring the carrier frequency, the licensee may use any method or procedure that has sufficient precision to establish that the carrier frequency is within the prescribed departure limits.
( c ) The primary standard of frequency for radio frequency measurements is the standard frequency maintained by the National Bureau of Standards or the standard signals of Stations WWV, WWVB, and WWVH of the National Bureau of Standards.
[43 FR 32783, July 28, 1978, as amended at 48 FR 44805, Sept. 30, 1983; 65 FR 30004, May 10, 2000; 89 FR 7255, Feb. 1, 2024]
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 904/2005

of 16 June 2005         

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of 21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 17 June 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 June 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1947/2002 (OJ L 299, 1.11.2002, p. 17).

----

ANNEX

to Commission Regulation of 16 June 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

----

(1)  Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 750/2005 (OJ L 126, 19.5.2005, p. 12). Code ‘            999            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMAPNY'S CONSOLIATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                            9697
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   245974
<ALLOWANCES>                                      7361
<INVENTORY>                                     124793
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                381526
<PP&E>                                          193533
<DEPRECIATION>                                   48228
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  796878
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           313228
<BONDS>                                         177083
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           250
<OTHER-SE>                                      205840
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    796878
<SALES>                                         965749
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                965749
<CGS>                                           705615
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   705615
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               25131
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   9046
<INCOME-TAX>                                      4720
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               4111
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      4111
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
No. 11-9679.

#### Hasan *v.*Holder, Attorney General.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, EPA proposes to amend 40 CFR part 49 as follows: PART 49

— INDIAN COUNTRY: AIR QUALITY PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT 1. Authority: The authority citation for part 49 continues to read as follows: Authority : 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
2. S ection 49.151 is amended by revising paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(A) and (B) to read as follows: § 49.151 Program overview.
* * * * * (c) * * * (1) * * * (iii) * * * (A) If you own or operate an existing true minor source in I ndian country (as defined in 40 CFR 49.152(d)), you must register your source with the reviewing authority in your area by March 1, 2013. If your true minor source is not an oil and natural gas source, and you commence construction after August 30, 2011, a nd before September 2, 2014, you must also register your source with the reviewing authority in your area within 90 days after the source begins operation. If your true minor source is an oil and natural gas source, and you commence construction after Augu st 30, 2011, and before October 3 , 2016, you must register your source with the reviewing authority in your area within 90 days after the source begins operation. You are exempt from these registration requirements if your true minor source is subject to §49 .138. Deleted: March 2Page 2 of 2 (B) If your true minor source is not an oil and natural gas source and you wish to begin construction of a new true minor source or a modification at an existing true minor source on or after September 2, 2014, you must first obtain a permit pursuan t to §§49.154 and 49.155 (or a general permit/permit by rule pursuant to §49.156, if applicable). If your true minor source is an oil and natural gas source and you wish to begin construction of a new true minor source or a modification at an existing true minor source on or after October 3 , 2016, you must first obtain a permit pursuant to §§49.154 and 49.155 (or a general permit/permit by rule pursuant to §49.156, if applicable). The proposed new source or modification will also be subject to the registratio n requirements of §49.160, except for sources that are subject to §49.138.
3

. Section 49.160 is amended by revis ing paragraph (c)(1)(ii) to read as follows: § 49.160 Registration program for minor sources in Indian country.

* * * * * (c) * * * (1) * * * (i) * * * (ii) If your true minor source is not an oil and natural gas source and you commence construction after August 30, 2011, and before September 2, 2014, you must register your source with the reviewing authority within 90 days after the source begins operation. I f your true minor source is an oil and natural gas source, and you commence construction after August 30, 2011, and before October 3 , 2016, you must register your source with the reviewing authority within 90 days after the source begins operation. Deleted: March 2

Deleted: March 2
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Eli Anton Robles, * From the 42nd District Court

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 28312A

Vs. No. 11-20-00174-CR * May 12, 2022

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Trotter, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 486 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                H.R. 486

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To provide for the addition of the Truman Farm Home to the Harry S 
        Truman National Historic Site in the State of Missouri.






103d CONGRESS

                              1st Session
                                H.R. 486



_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
  To provide for the addition of the Truman Farm Home to the Harry S 
        Truman National Historic Site in the State of Missouri.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROPERTY ACQUISITION

    The first section of the Act entitled ``An Act to establish the 
Harry S Truman National Historic Site in the State of Missouri, and for 
other purposes'', approved May 23, 1983 (97 Stat. 193), is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) The Secretary is further authorized to acquire from Jackson 
County, Missouri, by donation, the real property commonly referred to 
as the Truman Farm Home located in Grandview, Jackson County, Missouri, 
together with associated lands and related structures, comprising 
approximately 5.2 acres.
    ``(d) The Secretary is authorized and directed to provide 
appropriate political subdivisions of the State of Missouri with 
technical and planning assistance for the development and 
implementation of plans, programs, regulations, or other means for 
minimizing the adverse effects on the Truman Farm House of the 
development and use of adjacent lands.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 23 
      (legislative day, November 22), 1993.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.`
794 A.2d 179

#### SOLID ROCK BAPTIST CHURCH, ETC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RUDY V. CARLTON, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS. CONGREGATION OF SOLID ROCK BAPTIST CHURCH, PLAINTIFF-INTERVENOR-PETITIONER, v. SOLID ROCK BAPTIST CHURCH, ETC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

March 20, 2002.

Denied.
V

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4807

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade for the vessel TECUMSEH.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 20, 1994

Mr. MCDERMOTT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

TECUMSEH.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

4 Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the Act of June 19, 1886

5 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106 of title 46, Unit6 ed States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue

7 a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorse-
2

•HR 4807 IH

1 ment for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

2 TECUMSEH (Canadian registry number 815298).

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DIGITAL TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS, INC. FOR THE TWELVE
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             217
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,371
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,238
<INVENTORY>                                        903
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,321
<PP&E>                                           2,907
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,497
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,807
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,108
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,314
<COMMON>                                            47
<OTHER-SE>                                      (3,789)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,807
<SALES>                                          7,538
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,538
<CGS>                                            4,764
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,367
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 651
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (783)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    359
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (424)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.10)


</TABLE>
Hillsborough,

No. 4522.

#### Grover C. Gove *v.*R,. Wayne Crosby, *Adm’r, d. b. n. & a.*

Argued December 4, 1956.

Decided December 31, 1956.

*381*Robert D. Branch*(by brief and orally), for the plaintiff.

*Wyman, Starr, Booth, Wadleigh & Langdell (Mr. Wadleigh*orally), for the defendant.

Blandin, J.

The defendant argues that since the plaintiff took no exceptions during or after the trial except to file his bill of exceptions, no issues are before this court. *Nixon*v. *Cooper,*97 N. H. 327. While it is true as a general rule that exceptions not previously saved cannot be relied upon here, the rule has often been relaxed, particularly in court cases where the hearing was designed to secure a ruling on a single question, as the case here *(Eastman*v. *Waisman,*94 N. H. 253), or where questions of law are apparent from the face of the record. *McPhee*v. *Colburn,*98 N. H. 406. Since an examination of the proceedings discloses that the plaintiff made no binding agreement, as the defendant claims, precluding himself from raising the issue, we shall consider the contention that the Trial Court erred in placing on the plaintiff the burden of proving that Mrs. McNally was living apart from her husband at the time of her death for cause. In this state the burden of proof does not shift *(Cohn*v. *Saidel, 71*N. H. 558, 570) though the burden of going forward may do so. *Monroe Loan Soc.*v. *Nute,*88 N. H. 13, 16. It is presumed that the Trial Court observed these elementary principles. *McLaughlin*v. *Union-Leader,*100 N. H. 367. It follows that the ruling is correct and the plaintiff’s exception cannot be upheld.

The plaintiff further argues that the Trial Court was in error in refusing to find that Bertha M. McNally was living apart from *382her husband at the time of her death, because this action was opposed to the weight of the evidence. By agreement of the parties prior to the second trial the Court was to consider the evidence introduced at both hearings in reaching a decision and to determine only the issue of whether the decedent was living apart from her husband for cause at the time of her death. We have already held on evidence produced at the first hearing that a finding that the parties were living apart was not precluded under the statute, solely because they were under the same roof, and that condonation was not conclusively established. *Gove*v. *Crosby,*98 N. H. 469, 473. The evidence introduced at the second hearing requires no different conclusions. However, the Trial Court’s refusal to find that the decedent “was living apart from her husband at the time of her death” was warranted because the evidence did not compel such a finding. In the absence of a finding favorable to the plaintiff on this issue, the question whether the living apart was justified by an existing cause for divorce and any related issue of condonation were never reached. The plaintiff’s exceptions are therefore overruled. The order is

*Exceptions overruled.*

All concurred.
Summary of Analytical Results

(662 - May 2010)

 Sample ID 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB Date 5/3/10 5/10/10 5/17/10 5/24/10 Top (ft) 0000 Total (T)/ Bottom (ft) 0000

Analyte units Diss. (D) Duplicate # 1111

PFOA ug/L T 6.43 11.8 9.30 6.54

Samples were analyzed by Critical Path Services. Reported results 

PFOA = Perfluorooctanoic Acidug/L = micrograms per liter

 represent the average (rounded) of analysis in triplicate.

< and ND = Non detect at stated reporting limit Page 1 of 1

cwk
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the financial
statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          58,669
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,031,858
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,000
<INVENTORY>                                  7,750,282
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,012,880
<PP&E>                                          79,482
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,610
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,839,794
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,532,574
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        550
<COMMON>                                           420
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,806,250
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,839,794
<SALES>                                     31,722,659
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            31,722,659
<CGS>                                       28,044,742
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               28,044,742
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,129
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,566
<INCOME-TAX>                                    25,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,566
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,566
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)



</TABLE>
§ 69.610 Other hypothetical net balances. ( a ) The hypothetical net balance for an access element other than a Common Line element shall be computed as provided in this section.
( b ) If the company does not participate in the association tariff for such element, the hypothetical net balance shall be zero.
( c ) If the company does participate in the association tariff for such element, the hypothetical net balance shall be computed by deducting access revenues collected for such element from the sum of expense attributable to such element and the element residue apportioned to such company. The element residue shall be apportioned among such companies in the same proportions as the net investment attributable to such element.
( d ) The element residue shall be computed by deducting expenses of all participating companies attributable to such element from revenues collected by all participating companies for such element.
[48 FR 10358, Mar. 11, 1983, as amended at 51 FR 42237, Nov. 24, 1986]
# Comments on: Notice of Modified Procedures for Non-Electronic Filing and Submissions