alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

II Atti per i quali la pubblicazione non è una condizione di applicabilità

Commissione

----

RACCOMANDAZIONE DELLA COMMISSIONE

del 3 giugno 2005

relativa a orientamenti comuni per le facce nazionali delle monete euro destinate alla circolazione

[notificata con il numero C(2005) 1648]

(I testi in lingua finlandese, francese, greca, inglese, italiana, olandese, portoghese, spagnola, svedese e tedesca sono i soli facenti fede)

(2005/491/CE)

LA COMMISSIONE DELLE COMUNITÀ EUROPEE,

visto il trattato che istituisce la Comunità europea, in particolare l’articolo 211,

considerando quanto segue:

RACCOMANDA:

Articolo 1

Identificazione dello Stato di emissione

Le facce nazionali di tutti i valori unitari delle monete euro destinate alla circolazione devono recare l’indicazione dello Stato membro di emissione: il nome intero o una sua abbreviazione.

Articolo 2

Omissione della denominazione della moneta e del valore unitario

Articolo 3

Procedura d’informazione

Gli Stati membri s’informeranno a vicenda sul disegno delle nuove facce nazionali, incluse le incisioni sul contorno, prima di approvare tali disegni in via definitiva. A tale scopo, lo Stato membro di emissione trasmetterà i nuovi disegni alla Commissione, la quale informerà senza indugio gli altri Stati membri, eventualmente tramite il sottocomitato competente del Comitato economico e finanziario. Tutte le pertinenti informazioni riguardanti i nuovi disegni nazionali per le monete euro saranno pubblicate nella Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea.

Articolo 4

Campo di applicazione delle prassi raccomandate

La presente raccomandazione riguarda le facce nazionali e le incisioni sul contorno delle monete euro normali e commemorative destinate alla circolazione. Essa non si applica alle facce nazionali e alle incisioni sul contorno delle monete euro normali e commemorative destinate alla circolazione che sono state emesse prima dell’entrata in vigore della presente raccomandazione.

Articolo 5

Destinatari

La presente raccomandazione è rivolta a tutti gli Stati membri, quali sono definiti all’articolo 1 del regolamento (CE) n. 974/98.

Fatto a Bruxelles, il 3 giugno 2005.

Per la Commissione

Joaquín ALMUNIA

Membro della Commissione

----

(1)GU L 139 dell’11.5.1998, pag. 6. Tale regolamento è stato modificato dal regolamento (CE) n. 423/1999 (GU L 52 del 27.2.1999, pag. 2).

(2)GU L 139 dell’11.5.1998, pag. 1. Tale regolamento è stato modificato dal regolamento (CE) n. 2596/2000 (GU L 300 del 29.11.2000, pag. 2).

(3)GU L 264 del 15.10.2003, pag. 38.

----
Editorial Note on Part 74
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 74 appear at 64 FR 4055, Jan. 27, 1999.

§ 74.12 Notification of filing of applications. The provisions of § 73.1030 “Notification concerning interference to Radio Astronomy, Research, and Receiving Installations” apply to all stations authorized under this part of the FCC Rules except the following: ( a ) Mobile remote pickup stations (subpart D).
( b ) TV pickup stations (subpart F).
( c ) Low power auxiliary stations (subpart H).
[44 FR 58735, Oct. 11, 1979, as amended at 44 FR 77167, Dec. 31, 1979; 47 FR 28388, June 30, 1982]
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 153 (Wednesday, August 9, 2006)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 45361]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6839]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 153 / Wednesday, August 9, 2006 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 45361]]

                Presidential Determination No. 2006-18 of August 2, 
                2006

                
Waiving Prohibition on United States Military 
                Assistance With Respect to Lesotho

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                Consistent with the authority vested in me by section 
                2007 of the American Servicemembers' Protection Act of 
                2002 (the ``Act''), title II of Public Law 107-206 (22 
                U.S.C. 7421 et seq.), I hereby:

<bullet>

 Determine that Lesotho has entered into an agreement with the United 
States pursuant to Article 98 of the Rome Statute preventing the 
International Criminal Court from proceeding against U.S. personnel present 
in such country; and

<bullet>

 Waive the prohibition of section 2007(a) of the Act with respect to this 
country for as long as such agreement remains in force.

                You are authorized and directed to report this 
                determination to the Congress, and to arrange for its 
                publication in the Federal Register.

                    (Presidential Sig.)B

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    August 2, 2006.

[FR Doc. 06-6839
Filed 8-8-06; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
#### Edd Black, *Plaintiff in Error,*vs. State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

142 So. 599.

En Banc.

Opinion filed June 16, 1932.

Petition for rehearing denied July 5, 1932.

W. P. *.Chavous,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Cary D. Landis,*Attorney General, and *Boy Campbell,*Assistant, for the State.

Per Curiam.

In this cause Mr. Chief Justice Buford, Mr. Justice Brown and Mr. Justice Davis are of opinion that the judgment of the Circuit Court should be reversed, while Mr. Justice Whitfield, Mr. Justice Ellis and Mr. Justice Terrell are of opinion that said judgment should be affirmed. When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting' six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion, as to whether the judgment should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the judgment should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51, that the judgment of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

*16Affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.
§ 69.415 Reallocation of certain transport expenses. ( a ) - ( c ) [Reserved]
( d ) Beginning July 1, 2012, the amount of the Transport Interconnection Charges to be reallocated to each category shall be equal to the amount of Transport Interconnection Charge costs the non-price cap local exchange carrier was projected to shift to each category in projecting its 2011 Interstate Switched Access Revenue Requirement.
[66 FR 59733, Nov. 30, 2001, as amended at 78 FR 5750, Jan. 28, 2013; 78 FR 26269, May 6, 2013; 81 FR 24346, Apr. 25, 2016]
# Information Resources Management College Biographies

Information Resources Management College Biographies RSS Feed

- Dr. Marwan Jamal Areas of Interest:Wireless and mobile computing, simulation and modeling, artificial Intelligence,
# Lewis Named Chancellor

/ Published Dec. 20, 2021

On Friday 17 December 2021, the President of the National Defense University, Lieutenant General Michael Plehn, announced Dr. Cassandra C. Lewis would serve as the full-time permanent Chancellor of the College of Information and Cyberspace (CIC). The announcement was made at the CIC Holiday Party, held on historic Fort McNair in Washington, DC.

This news comes after more than three years of CIC without a full-time Chancellor, since the departure of Rear Admiral (Retired) Janice Hamby in 2018 and then Acting Chancellor Tom Wingfield departing to serve as Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Cyber Policy.

Lewis had been serving as the Acting Chancellor for about two years, in addition to her duties as Dean of Faculty and Academic Programs. Lewis has been part of the College for over a decade, and played an integral role in establishing the College's very successful Master's Degree program as well as many other initiatives. During her remarks following the announcement, Lewis thanked the CIC team and NDU leadership for their day to day support of the mission and each other.
§ 73.853 Licensing requirements and service. ( a ) An LPFM station may be licensed only to: ( 1 ) Nonprofit educational organizations and upon a showing that the proposed station will be used for the advancement of an educational program; and
( 2 ) State and local governments and non-government entities that will provide non-commercial public safety radio services.
( 3 ) Tribal Applicants, as defined in paragraph (c) of this section that will provide non-commercial radio services.
( b ) Only local organizations will be permitted to submit applications and to hold authorizations in the LPFM service. For the purposes of this paragraph, an organization will be deemed local if it can certify, at the time of application, that it meets the criteria listed below and if it continues to satisfy the criteria at all times thereafter. ( 1 ) The applicant, its local chapter or branch is physically headquartered or has a campus within 16.1 km (10 miles) of the proposed site for the transmitting antenna for applicants in the top 50 urban markets, and 32.1 km (20 miles) for applicants outside of the top 50 urban markets;
( 2 ) It has 75% of its board members residing within 16.1 km (10 miles) of the proposed site for the transmitting antenna for applicants in the top 50 urban markets, and 32.1 km (20 miles) for applicants outside of the top 50 urban markets; or
( 3 ) In the case of any applicant proposing a public safety radio service, the applicant has jurisdiction within the service area of the proposed LPFM station.
( 4 ) In the case of a Tribal Applicant, as defined in paragraph (c) of this section, the Tribal Applicant's Tribal lands, as that term is defined in § 73.7000, are within the service area of the proposed LPFM station.
( c ) A Tribal Applicant is a Tribe or an entity that is 51 percent or more owned or controlled by a Tribe or Tribes. For these purposes, Tribe is defined as set forth in § 73.7000.
[65 FR 7640, Feb. 15, 2000, as amended at 73 FR 3216, Jan. 17, 2008; 78 FR 2107, Jan. 9, 2013]
No. 11-6037.

#### Graham *v.*United States.

Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.
Editorial Note on Part 36
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 74 FR 23956, May 22, 2009, 77 FR 30411, May 23, 2012, 82 FR 25538, June 2, 2017, and corrected at 83 FR 4153, Jan. 30, 2018. Nomenclature changes to part 36 also appear at 83 FR 63587, Dec. 11, 2018, and 84 FR 4360, Feb. 15, 2019.

§ 36.341 Cable and wire facilities expenses—Account 6410. ( a ) This account includes the expenses for poles, antenna supporting structures, aerial cable, underground cable, buried cable, submarine cable, deep sea cable, intrabuilding network cable, aerial wire, and conduit systems.
( b ) The general method of separating cable and wire facilities expenses amoung the operations is to assign them on the basis of Account 2410—Cable and Wire Facilities.
§ 76.103 Parties entitled to syndicated exclusivity. ( a ) Television broadcast station licensees shall be entitled to exercise exclusivity rights pursuant to § 76.101 in accordance with the contractual provisions of their syndicated program license agreements, consistent with § 76.109.
( b ) Distributors of syndicated programming shall be entitled to exercise exclusive rights pursuant to § 76.101 for a period of one year from the initial broadcast syndication licensing of such programming anywhere in the United States; provided, however, that distributors shall not be entitled to exercise such rights in areas in which the programming has already been licensed.
IIA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4790

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 9 (legislative day, AUGUST 8), 1994

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse under construction in St. Louis, Missouri, as the ‘‘Thomas F. Eagleton

United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The United States courthouse under construction at

5 111 South Tenth Street in St. Louis, Missouri, shall be

6 known and designated as the ‘‘Thomas F. Eagleton

7 United States Courthouse’’.
2

HR 4790 RFS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

4 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

5 to be a reference to the ‘‘Thomas F. Eagleton United

6 States Courthouse’’.

Passed the House of Representatives August 8,

1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
**Exhibit21.1**

****

**Subsidiariesof American Wagering, Inc. (“AWI”):**
| **Name**                                                                                                                    | ** ** | **State of Incorporation  or Organization** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------------------|
| Computerized Bookmaking Systems, Inc. (“CBS”; a  wholly owned subsidiary of AWI)                                  |       | Nevada                                      |
|                                                                                                                        |       |                                        |
| AWI International, Inc. (“AWI Int’l”; a wholly owned  subsidiary of AWI)                                     |       | Nevada                                      |
|                                                                                                                        |       |                                        |
| Leroy’s Horse & Sports Place, Inc. (“Leroy’s”; a  wholly owned subsidiary of AWI)                   |       | Nevada                                      |
|                                                                                                                        |       |                                        |
| AWI Manufacturing, Inc. (“AWIM”; a wholly owned  subsidiary of AWI)                                               |       | Nevada                                      |
|                                                                                                                        |       |                                        |
| AWI Gaming, Inc. (“AWIG”; a wholly owned subsidiary  of AWI)                                                      |       | Nevada                                      |
|                                                                                                                        |       |                                        |
| Sturgeon’s, LLC (dba Sturgeon’s Inn & Casino  “Sturgeon’s”; a wholly owned subsidiary of AWIG) |       | Nevada                                      |
|                                                                                                                        |       |                                        |
| **Dissolved Subsidiary**:                                                                                                   |       |                                        |
| ** **                                                                                                                  |       |                                        |
| Contest Sports Systems, Inc. (“CSS”; a wholly owned  subsidiary of CBS)                                           |       | Nevada                                      |

 

----
No. 10-10841.

#### Walker *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-10184.

#### Hernandez *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 10.10

NET/TECH HYGIENE GUARD

PHASE II DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT PROPOSAL

Hygiene Guard Phase II Deliverables

The following is a list of deliverables remain the same as detailed in the
original proposal submitted for your review, and accepted. Phase II overall
scope would be full, detailed engineering development and implementation of the
electronics and packaging.

1. Engineering and Development: A complete engineering package ready for
submission to P.C. board manufacturers. This would include system schematics,
P.C. board layouts and artwork.

2. Prototype and Development: A fully functional prototype system and modified
soap dispenser, equipped with the proposed sensing device, based on the design
architecture selected for production. Some compromises in actual packaging of
the badge for prototyping may be necessary due to very long lead times
associated with tooling and molding.

3. Implementation and Debug: two weeks of engineering time to install, set up
and demonstrate the prototype system.

4. Documentation: This includes all system drawings, installation manual and
operators manual.

SDC would be prepared to offer our facility as a demonstration site if so
desired.

Non-Recurring Costs:

         Engineering and Development                 $18,000
         Prototyping fabrication            $27,000
         Implementation and Debug                    $ 5,000
         Documentation                               $15,000

Total Phase II Development Costs:                    $65,000

Delivery:

Delivery of the complete working prototype is in three months, ARO. Please refer
to the original proposal outlining Phase I and Phase II which states Phase II to
take approximately 4 months. The critical path item will be the badge itself. We
may be able to fabricate a functional mock up of the badge so as to allow
demonstration of the complete system on a more aggressive schedule. The primary
reason for the long delivery is the complicated artwork and tooling necessary
for miniaturizing the badge. Delivery of the other major components of the
system will be by year end.


<PAGE>


Obviously the other elements of the project such as the system schematics will
be completed much sooner, as the first piece fabrication activity is consuming
most of Phase II time. We will begin an active campaign of pressure, both
verbally and with pay premiums to assist in compressing the fabrication time.

Terms:

SDC terms are net 30 days. Billing to be submitted monthly. SDC is prepared to
accept Net/Tech stock for half our fee, and the balance in cash. All direct
costs to SDC such as subcontractor expenses and vendor supplied items will be
billed through to Net/Tech, under the terms stated above, with all mark-ups
applied to the fee portion


Authorized Signatures:

                                       

/s/ KEVIN BRADY                       /s/ GLENN E. COHEN
------------------  Date: 10/29/96   -------------------------   Date: 10/29/96
Kevin Brady, VP                       Glenn E. Cohen, President
Product Development
#### § 69.413 High cost loop support universal service fund expenses.

Beginning April 1, 1989, expenses allocated to the interstate jurisdiction pursuant to §§ 54.1310 and 36.641 of this chapter shall be assigned to the Universal Service Fund Element.

[79 FR 39193, July 9, 2014]
SERVED: March 21,2016 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

AIR MEDICAL RESOURCES GROUP, INC. 

DOCKET NO. FAA-2014-0552 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

ORDER REASSIGNING PROCEEDING 

< \ -~ ' ; . 

' .. :: ';' lJ; .. ;~,: ~··;, '\ ,~-~ l .) .. 

Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin has transferred to the Food and Drug 

Administration. Accordingly, this proceeding is hereby reassigned from Judge Goodwin to 

Administrative Law Judge Douglas M. Rawald. Any dates set for hearing or prehearing 

conference are suspended until further notice. All other orders remain in full force and effect 

absent further order. 

SO ORDERED. 

a~....___..., ... 

Ronnie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative L 

Attachment-Service List 
,. 

SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence A venue, S. W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl 0001 

ONE COPY 

Gregory S. Winton, Respondent 's Counsel 

The Aviation Law Firm 

1997 Annapolis Exchange Parkway, Suite 300 

Annapolis, MD 21401 

TEL: 301-294-8550 

FAX: '866-568-9886 

Adam Runkel, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Enforcement Division- Western Team 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, W A 98056 

TEL: 425-227-2914 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

Email: adam.runkel@faa.gov 

The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department ofTransportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: .202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0552 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
# - 4,4 (TIGAIL FILED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 23-0272 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MONTANA and PAUL FREDERICK HENKE, M.D., on behalfofthemselves and their patients,

Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. STATE OF MONTANA and AUSTIN KNUDSEN, Attorney General ofthe State of Montana, in his official capacity, and his agents and successors,

Defendants and Appellants. 

# MEL) MAR 12 2024 Bowen Greenwoo,- Clerk of Supreme State of ORDER Bowen Greenwood CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF MONTANA

Nicole Saharsky, ofWashington, DC,has petitioned for permissionto appearpro hac vice before this Court in the above-entitled cause. Having reviewed the application and havingdetermined that, as required by ourRules for Admission to the Bar ofMontana, Petitioner Saharsky is currently in good standingwith another state jurisdiction in which Saharsky is admitted to the practice of law, Montana counsel listed inthe application is in good standingwith the State Bar ofMontana, and this is the first appearance ofPetitioner and the fourth appearance ofPetitioner's firm underthe pro hac vice rules, with good cause showing under Rule VI(C), IT ISHEREBY ORDERED that the application ofNicole Saharsky to appear pro hac vice in the above-entitled cause is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to Nichole Saharsky, to all counsel ofrecord in this appeal, and to the State Bar ofMontana. DATED this l2th day ofMarch 2024. 03/12/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0272 03/18/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0160

### For the Court, By

2