alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of NetFabric Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Vasan Thatham,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





August  18,
      2010
                By:
                /s/ Vasan
      ThathamName:
      Vasan ThathamTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
NetFabric Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by NetFabric Holdings, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Notice of RTCA Special Committee 206 meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a meeting of RTCA Special Committee 206: Aeronautical Information Services Data Link.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held September 11-15, 2006, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1828 L Street, NW., Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., Suite 805, Washington, DC, 20036-5133; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 833-9434; Web site                         *http://www.rtca.org.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (P.L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for a Special Committee 206 meeting. The agenda will include:

*September 11:*

*Presentations:*

*September 12-14:*

*September 15:*

                    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in the                     **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**                     section. Members of the public may present a written statement to the committee at any time.                

Dated: Issued in Washington, DC, on August 14, 2006.

Francisco, Estrada C.,

RTCA Advisory Committee.

[FR Doc. 06-7113  Filed 8-23-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
#### § 32.6531 Power expense.

This account shall include the cost of electrical power used to operate the telecommunications network.
S89A0536.

#### MILES et al. v. COLLINS.

(384 SE2d 630)

Decided September 29, 1989

Reconsideration denied November 8, 1989.

*A. G. Wells, Jr.,*for appellants.

Smith, Justice.

The appellants filed an appeal in the Superior Court of Bryan County seeking relief from a tax assessment and demand made by appellee Marcus E. Collins, Revenue Commissioner of the State of Georgia (Revenue Department). The appellant’s motion for summary judgment was denied and the appellee’s motion for summary judgment was granted. The appellants filed a direct appeal to this Court, and the Revenue Department filed a motion to dismiss for failure to file a discretionary application. We dismiss.

Appeals from decisions of superior courts reviewing decisions of state administrative agencies must come to the appellate courts of this state by way of application. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1). This Court has recognized that a revenue department assessment is a decision of a state administrative agency within the meaning of OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1), and an application must be filed. *Plantation Pipe Line Co. v. Strickland,*249 Ga. 829 (294 SE2d 471) (1982); *Wheeler v. Strickland,*248 Ga. 85 (281 SE2d 556) (1981). The appellants failed to file an application for discretionary appeal; therefore, this direct appeal must be dismissed.

*Appeal dismissed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*537
      *Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, David A. Runnion, Senior Assistant Attorney General,*for appellee.
The Company's 2006 Executive Incentive Compensation Program



 EXHIBIT #10.18 
 2006 EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM 
 An Executive Incentive Compensation Program (“Program”) was
implemented in January of 2003. This Program pays incentives to the members of the Executive Management team for Camden National Corporation (the “Company”), Camden National Bank and Acadia Trust N.A. This Program is an integral part of an
overall management strategy that enables the CEO of the Company to encourage executives to reach the fiscal targets in strategic and operating plans. 
 The
incentive is based on net income before taxes (NIBT). The Program is set up so the incentive pool is added to target NIBT, so the incentive pool is funded through increasing NIBT above the target level. This ensures the shareholders that they
receive the results that were originally planned. The Program will pay out incrementally when the named company hits 96% of budgeted NIBT. No incentive is paid if NIBT does not reach 96%. The incentives increase incrementally up to 110% of NIBT
where it is capped. Each month an updated grid is produced showing current and projected NIBT results for each company. 
 Each executive has a targeted
incentive percentage based on that position’s contribution to the overall results of the Company. An executive must have an overall satisfactory performance rating on their individual performance and goals before that executive is eligible to
participate in the Program. Each executive’s payout will be based 60% on the named company’s financial results (per the model) and 40% on each individual executive’s attainment of their own goals as measured by the CEO of the Company.

 After the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm reviews the year-end financial results, and the CEO and Compensation Committee have
reviewed each individual’s performance, the incentive amount, if any, will be distributed. 
 The Compensation Committee reserves the right to modify
the Executive Incentive Compensation Program if unexpected anomalies result during the application of the pre-defined grid.
No. 11-8707.

#### Tate *v.*Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis [ante,*p. 902] denied.
#### § 69.157 Line port costs in excess of basic, analog service.

To the extent that the costs of ISDN line ports, and line ports associated with other services, exceed the costs of a line port used for basic, analog service, local exchange carriers may recover the difference through a separate monthly end-user charge. As of June 30, 2000, these rates will be capped until June 30, 2005.

[65 FR 38704, June 21, 2000; 65 FR 57744, Sept. 26, 2000]
§ 22.949 Unserved Area licensing; minimum coverage requirements. ( a ) The Unserved Area licensing process described in this section is on-going and applications may be filed at any time, subject to the following coverage requirements: ( 1 ) Applicants for authority to operate a new Cellular system or expand an existing Cellular Geographic Service Area (CGSA) in Unserved Area must propose a CGSA or CGSA expansion of at least 130 contiguous square kilometers (50 contiguous square miles) using the methodology of § 22.911.
( 2 ) Applicants for authority to operate a new Cellular system must not propose coverage of water areas only (or water areas and uninhabited islands or reefs only), except for Unserved Area in the Gulf of Mexico Service Area.
( b ) There is no limit to the number of Unserved Area applications that may be granted on each channel block of each CMA that is subject to the procedures of this section. Consequently, Unserved Area applications are mutually exclusive only if the proposed CGSAs would overlap. Mutually exclusive applications are processed using the general procedures under § 22.131.
( c ) Unserved Area applications under this section may propose a CGSA covering more than one CMA. Each Unserved Area application must request authorization for only one CGSA and must not propose a CGSA overlap with an existing CGSA.
( d ) Settlements among some, but not all, applicants with mutually exclusive applications for Unserved Area (partial settlements) under this section are prohibited. Settlements among all applicants with mutually exclusive applications under this section (full settlements) are allowed and must be filed no later than the date that the FCC Form 175 (short-form) is filed.
[79 FR 72152, Dec. 5, 2014]
# **EXHIBIT31.1        Section 302Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

**I, Gregg E. Hunter,Chief Executive Officer, Commercial National Financial Corporationcertify that:**

****

I have reviewed this Amendment No.1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Commercial NationalFinancial Corporation;

****

Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;

****

Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

****

The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant andwe have:

****

designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls or procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

****

evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and

****

disclosed in this report any changein the registrant's internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;and

****

****

The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and to the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

****

all significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controlover financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and

****

any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financialinformation.

****

****
| Date:  May 21,2004 | By: | /s/ Gregg E.Hunter     |
|-------------------------|-----|------------------------|
|                         |     | Gregg E. Hunter        |
|                         |     | Chief ExecutiveOfficer |
§ 10.280 Subscribers' right to opt out of WEA notifications. ( a ) CMS providers may provide their subscribers with the option to opt out of the “Child Abduction Emergency/AMBER Alert,” “Imminent Threat Alert” and “Public Safety Message” classes of Alert Messages.
( b ) CMS providers shall provide their subscribers with a clear indication of what each option means, and provide examples of the types of messages the customer may not receive as a result of opting out.
[73 FR 54525, Sept. 22, 2008, as amended at 78 FR 16808, Mar. 19, 2013; 81 FR 75725, Nov. 1, 2016]
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"The Court - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"fP1p1NLqcv\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/the-court\/\">The Court<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/the-court\/embed\/#?secret=fP1p1NLqcv\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“The Court” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"fP1p1NLqcv\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"General information relating to the Federal Circuit can be found on these pages. About the Court Administrative Orders Advisory Council Clerk’s Office Human Resources Judges Notices & Announcements Reports & Statistics"}
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Xiao-Qing (Angela) Du, Chief Executive Officer of China Mobility Solutions, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(a)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, to which this certification accompanies (the Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b) the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

           Date: November 20, 2006By:  /s/ Xiao-Qing (Angela) Du Xiao-Qing (Angela) Du Title: Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to China Mobility Solutions, Inc. and will be retained by China Mobility Solutions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

984967.3

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ernest Cheng, Chief Financial Officer of China Mobility Solutions, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(a)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, to which this certification accompanies (the Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b) the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

           Date: November 20, 2006
By:  /s/ Ernest Cheng Ernest Cheng Title: Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to China Mobility Solutions, Inc. and will be retained by China Mobility Solutions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the National Advisory Dental and Craniofacial Research Council.

The meeting will be open to the public as indicated below, with attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in advance of the meeting.

                    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and/or contract proposals and the                     Start Printed Page 47819                    discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications and/or contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.                

*Name of Committee:*                         National Advisory Dental and Craniofacial Research Council.                    

*Date:*                         September 18, 2006.                    

*Open:*                         8:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         Director's Report; Concept Clearances; OPASI Briefing, Deputy Director; Council Operating Procedures—Revisions.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Building 31, C Wing, 31 Center Drive, Conference Room 10, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Closed:*                         1 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications and/or proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Building 31, C Wing, 31 Center Drive, Conference Room 10, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Norman S. Braveman, PhD, Assistant to the Director, NIH-NIDCR, Building 31, RM. 5B55, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-2089, NORMAN.BRAVEMAN@NIH.GOV.                    

                        Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home page:                         *http://www.nidcr.nih.gov/​about,*                         where an agenda and any additional information for the meeting will be posted when available.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 10, 2006.

Anna Snouffer, 

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 06-6995 Filed 8-17-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Merrimack

No. 80-368

#### Earl L. Hull v. Berkshire Mutual Insurance Company

March 16, 1981

*Wig gin & Nourie,*of Manchester *(Richard B. McNamara*on the brief and orally), for the defendant.

*S. David Siff,*of Concord, by brief and orally, for the plaintiff.

Memorandum Opinion

In 1978, Joseph and Elaine Morretto hired Earl Hull, a masonry contractor, to construct a front porch, steps, and a retaining wall on their property. Before the work was completed, a disagreement arose between the parties, and Hull was discharged. The Morrettos then sued Hull for the allegedly defective work that he had completed. Hull, who had an insurance policy with the defendant, asked the insurance company to defend against the suit. When the insurer denied coverage, Hull brought a petition for declaratory judgment under RSA 491:22. On stipulated facts, the Master *(Robert A. Carignan,*Esq.) found that Hull was not covered by the policy for the damages alleged by the Morrettos. The Superior Court (Cdnn, J.) approved the master’s report, and Hull appealed.

Under our recent ruling in *Trombly v. Blue Cross/Blue Shield,*120 N.H. 764, 423 A.2d 980 (1980), the issue is whether there is an ambiguity in the contract. We find no ambiguity. The insurance contract at issue provides coverage for “all sums which the *insured*shall become legally obligated to pay as damages because of

A. *bodily injury*or

*231B. *property damage*

caused by an *occurrence. . .*.” (Emphasis original.) “Occurrence” is defined as “an accident including continuous or repeated exposure to conditions, which results in bodily injury or property damage neither expected nor intended from the standpoint of the insured.” Relying on *Commercial Union Assurance Co. v. Gilford Marina, Inc.,*119 N.H. 788, 408 A.2d 405 (1979), and *Commercial Union Assurance Cos. v. Gollan,*118 N.H. 744, 394 A.2d 839 (1978), Hull argues that the policy does not clearly exclude coverage. Those cases are distinguishable from this case. In the Morrettos’ suit against Hull, they allege no bodily injury or property damage. Nor do they allege damages caused by accident. The sole basis of their suit is a claim for money damages for Hull’s defective work. We find no error below. *See Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Bartlett,*307 Minn. 72, 80, 240 N.W.2d 310, 314 (1976), *overruled on other grounds, Prahm v. Rupp Const. Co.,*277 N.W.2d 389, 391 (Minn. 1979).

*Affirmed.*