alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Appendix N

Reasons for Exclusion During 

Quality Assessment

	Reasons for exclusion during quality assessment

Reason for Exclusion	Number of Articles

Does not report outcomes relevant to our study questions.	6

Was neither a controlled trial nor a case series ≥ 100 patients.	4

No original data.	3

Only addresses intracapsular cataract extraction.	3

Data reported in an unabstractable fashion.	2

Other (e.g., more than half the patients did not have glaucoma)	2

Does not address open angle or primary angle closure glaucoma.	1
04/20/2012 08:35 FAX 614 447 3747 A division 

### oftheAmerican Chemical Society CAS CS 141003/003 

# InventoryExpertService Phone:000-631,1884,614-447,3870 Fax: 614-447,3747 

### E..mall:o.nswe10@cos.org Web: **www.cas.or~prnducr.slclientl** INVENTORY EXPERT SERVICE REPORT IES-ORDER NUMBER: REGISTRY NUMBER: 

# 0 lf 

### this box 

### is ehacked, CAS llaa 

### made eorrecticm(a) marktod 

### iA red to yo= DS 

### oz:-dto:.:, l'leaae Dalte 

### tha IIDlll COZ"Z"eCtiOJ>.(a) 

### to yo= 

### PJIIf hafore 

### 8\llmdtting" 

### it to the l!!l'A.
CAS 2.540 Olenat\g)' R.lver Road P.O.BoxJl4l Columbus.Ohio 43:2l

**0~0334** USA
§ 76.73 General EEO policy. ( a ) Equal opportunity in employment shall be afforded by each cable entity to all qualified persons, and no person shall be discriminated against in employment by such entity because of race, color, religion, national origin, age or sex.
( b ) Each employment unit shall establish, maintain, and carry out a positive continuing program of specific practices designed to assure equal opportunity to every aspect of cable system employment policy and practice. Under the terms of its program, an employment unit shall: ( 1 ) Define the responsibility of each level of management to ensure a positive application and vigorous enforcement of its policy of equal opportunity, and establish a procedure to review and control managerial and supervisory performance;
( 2 ) Inform its employees and recognized employee organizations of the positive equal employment opportunity policy and program and enlist their cooperation;
( 3 ) Communicate its equal employment opportunity policy and progam and its employment needs to sources of qualified applicants without regard to race, color, religion, national origin, age or sex, and solicit their recruitment assistance on a continuing basis;
( 4 ) Conduct a continuing program to exclude every form of prejudice or discrimination based upon race, color, religion, national origin, age or sex from its personnel policies and practices and working conditions; and
( 5 ) Conduct a continuing review of job structure and employment practices and adopt positive recruitment, training, job design, and other measures needed to ensure genuine equality of opportunity to participate fully in all organizational units, occupations, and levels of responsibility.
EXHIBIT
32.2



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Nustate Energy Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2015 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Kevin Yates, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.
The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.



May
2, 2016



|By: | /s/
    Kevin Yates                                                     | 
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|    | Kevin
    Yates                                                         | 
|    | Chief
    Financial Officer, principal financial and accounting officer | 



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to
the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the Southern

District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 06-2724

___________

Napoleon Hartsfield, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Southern District of Iowa.

Department of Corrections; *

Charlie Hourihan, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: November 5, 2007

Filed: November 8, 2007

___________

Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Napoleon Hartsfield appeals the district court’s1

 grant of summary judgment to

the remaining defendant in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action following this court’s remand

for further proceedings on a retaliation claim. We conclude that summary judgment

was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. The judgment is affirmed. See

8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
Exhibit 10.3


    
      

    


    Exhibit
      10.3

    SECOND
      AMENDMENT TO

    EMPLOYMENT
      AGREEMENT

    BY
      AND AMONG

    BIG
      LOTS, INC.,

    BIG
      LOTS STORES, INC.

    AND

    STEVEN
      S. FISHMAN

    


    This
      second amendment (“Amendment”) to the employment agreement by and among Big
      Lots, Inc. (“BLI”), Big Lots Stores, Inc. (“Big Lots”) and their affiliates,
      predecessor, successor, subsidiaries and other related companies (collectively
      the “Company”) and Steven S. Fishman (“Executive”), collectively, the “Parties,”
dated July 6, 2005, as previously amended by the first amendment to the
      employment agreement effective February 21, 2006 (collectively, the
“Agreement”), is effective as of the date below (“Effective Date”). Capitalized
      terms used herein but not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have the
      meanings set forth in the Agreement.

     

    1.00  
       Section
      3.02.    
      The fourth sentence of Section 3.02 of the Agreement is amended by deleting
      it
      in its entirety and replacing it with the following:

     

    The
      Executive’s Bonus Payout percentage will consist of a Target Bonus of 100
      percent of Base Salary and a Stretch Bonus of 200 percent of Base
      Salary.

     

    2.00  
       The
      Agreement.    
      Except
      as
      otherwise provided herein, all provisions of the Agreement are and shall remain
      in full force and effect and are hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects,
      and the execution, delivery and effectiveness of this Amendment shall not
      operate as a waiver or amendment of any provision of the Agreement not
      specifically amended herein. All references to the Agreement shall be deemed
      to
      include this Amendment.

     

    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have duly executed and delivered this Amendment
      as
      of March 9, 2007.

     

    
      	
              BIG
                LOTS, INC.

            	 	
              STEVEN
                S. FISHMAN

            
	 	 	 
	
              By:
                /s/ Brad A. Waite

            	 	
              /s/
                Steven S. Fishman

            
	 	 	 
	
              BIG
                LOTS STORES, INC.

            	 	 
	 	 	 
	
              By:
                /s/ Charles W. Haubiel II
No. 11-5143.

#### Wray *v.*Reynolds, Warden.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 31(b)



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Michael R. Sayre, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.



5. The
registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                       
|-----------------------
|Date: March 24, 2004   
|                       
|/s/ Michael R. Sayre   
|Chief Financial Officer
§ 8.209 Grant of authorization to use FCC IoT Label. ( a ) A CLA will grant cybersecurity labeling authorization if it finds from an examination of the application and supporting data, or other matter which it may officially notice, that the consumer IoT product complies with the program requirements.
( b ) Grants will be made in writing showing the effective date of the grant.
( c ) Cybersecurity certification shall not attach to any product, nor shall any use of the Cyber Trust Mark be deemed effective, until the application has been granted.
( d ) Grants will be effective from the date of authorization.
( e ) The grant shall identify the CLA granting the authorization and the Commission as the issuing authority.
( f ) In cases of a dispute, the Commission will be the final arbiter.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Understanding breast changes: ahealth guide for women**
 
SuDoc Number:HE 20.3158:B 74/8/2012

Item Number:0507-G-06 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000881361
 
PDF| Mobi | ePub
 
May 7, 2020
V

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4813

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade for the vessel BIG DAD.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 21, 1994

Mr. SHAW introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

BIG DAD.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

4 Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the Act of June 19, 1886

5 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106 of title 46,

6 United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may

7 issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate en-
2

•HR 4813 IH

1 dorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the

2 vessel BIG DAD (United States official number 565022).

Æ
No. 11-536.

#### Basham *v.*Arkansas.

Ct. App. Ark. Certiorari denied.
#### § 68.201 Connection to the public switched telephone network.

Terminal equipment may not be connected to the public switched telephone network unless it has either been certified by a Telecommunications Certification Body or the responsible party has followed all the procedures in this subpart for Supplier's Declaration of Conformity.

[66 FR 7583, Jan. 24, 2001]
§ 80.1131 Transmissions of urgency communications. ( a ) In a terrestrial system the announcement of the urgency message must be made on one or more of the distress and safety calling frequencies specified in § 80.1077 using digital selective calling and the urgency call format. A separate announcement need not be made if the urgency message is to be transmitted through the maritime mobile-satellite service.
( b ) The urgency signal and message must be transmitted on one or more of the distress and safety traffic frequencies specified in § 80.1077, or via the maritime mobile-satellite service or on other frequencies used for this purpose.
( c ) The urgency signal consists of the words PAN PAN. In radiotelephony each word of the group must be pronounced as the French word “panne”.
( d ) The urgency call format and the urgency signal indicate that the calling station has a very urgent message to transmit concerning the safety of a mobile unit or a person.
( e ) In radiotelephony, the urgency message must be preceded by the urgency signal, repeated three times, and the identification of the transmitting station.
( f ) In narrow-band direct-printing, the urgency message must be preceded by the urgency signal and the identification of the transmitting station.
( g ) The urgency call format or urgency signal must be sent only on the authority of the master or the person responsible for the mobile unit carrying the mobile station or mobile earth station.
( h ) The urgency call format or the urgency signal may be transmitted by a land station or a coast earth station with the approval of the responsible authority.
( i ) When an urgency message which calls for action by the stations receiving the message has been transmitted, the station responsible for its transmission must cancel it as soon as it knows that action is no longer necessary.
( j ) Error correction techniques, in accordance with ITU-R M.625-3 (incorporated by reference, *see* § 80.7), as specified in § 80.1101, must be used for urgency messages by direct-printing telegraphy. All messages must be preceded by at least one carriage return, a line feed signal, a letter shift signal, and the urgency signal PAN PAN.
( k ) Urgency communications by direct-printing telegraphy should be in the ARQ mode when communicating directly to the Coast Guard or other coast stations on channels which they normally guard. Other distress communications, including those on simplex channels provided for that purpose, should be in the broadcast forward error correction mode. The ARQ mode may subsequently be used when it is advantageous to do so.
[57 FR 9065, Mar. 16, 1992, as amended at 68 FR 46981, Aug. 7, 2003; 76 FR 67618, Nov. 2, 2011]
§ 51.233 Significant degradation of services caused by deployment of advanced services. ( a ) Where a carrier claims that a deployed advanced service is significantly degrading the performance of other advanced services or traditional voiceband services, that carrier must notify the deploying carrier and allow the deploying carrier a reasonable opportunity to correct the problem. Where the carrier whose services are being degraded does not know the precise cause of the degradation, it must notify each carrier that may have caused or contributed to the degradation.
( b ) Where the degradation asserted under paragraph (a) of this section remains unresolved by the deploying carrier(s) after a reasonable opportunity to correct the problem, the carrier whose services are being degraded must establish before the relevant state commission that a particular technology deployment is causing the significant degradation.
( c ) Any claims of network harm presented to the deploying carrier(s) or, if subsequently necessary, the relevant state commission, must be supported with specific and verifiable information.
( d ) Where a carrier demonstrates that a deployed technology is significantly degrading the performance of other advanced services or traditional voice band services, the carrier deploying the technology shall discontinue deployment of that technology and migrate its customers to technologies that will not significantly degrade the performance of other such services.
( e ) Where the only degraded service itself is a known disturber, and the newly deployed technology satisfies at least one of the criteria for a presumption that it is acceptable for deployment under § 51.230, the degraded service shall not prevail against the newly-deployed technology.
[65 FR 1346, Jan. 10, 2000]
§ 73.1001 Scope. ( a ) The rules in this subpart are common to all AM, FM, TV and Class A TV broadcast services, commercial and noncommercial.
( b ) Rules in part 73 applying exclusively to a particular broadcast service are contained in the following: AM, subpart A; FM, subpart B; Noncommercial Educational FM, subpart C; TV, subpart E; LPFM, subpart G; and Class A TV, subpart J.
( c ) Certain provisions of subpart H of this part apply to International Broadcast Stations (subpart F, part 73), LPFM (subpart G, part 73), and Low Power TV and TV Translator Stations (subpart G, part 74) where the rules for those services so provide.
( d ) The provisions of this part applying to licensees also apply to holders of construction permits (permittees).
[43 FR 32781, July 28, 1978, as amended at 52 FR 31399, Aug. 20, 1987; 65 FR 7648, Feb. 15, 2000; 65 FR 30003, May 10, 2000; 89 FR 7253, Feb. 1, 2024]
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with this Quarterly Report of HIV-VAC Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the year period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin Murray,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the
         period ending December 31, 2006, fairly presents, in all material
         respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HIV-VAC
         Inc.

Dated: September 30, 2011

/s/ Kevin Murray
Kevin Murray
Chief Executive Officer
Embarq Corp Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan



 EXHIBIT 10.13 
 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PROGRAM 
 Description of the Non-Employee Director Compensation Program

 Under the Director Compensation Program for non-employee directors (the “Director Compensation Program”) of Embarq
Corporation (“Embarq”), non-employee directors will be paid (1) an annual cash retainer of $50,000, and (2) a fee equal to $1,500 for each meeting of the Board of Directors (the “Board”)(or any meeting of a Board
committee on which a non-employee director is a member or an invited guest) which the eligible director personally attends, and $750 for each such meeting which the eligible director attends by telephone. The Chair of the Board’s Audit
Committee receives an additional annual retainer of $15,000 in recognition of such service and the Chair of any other Board committee (including special committees) receives an additional annual retainer of $10,000 in recognition of such service.
The Board’s Lead Independent Director also receives an additional annual retainer of $20,000. All cash compensation is paid quarterly and all retainers are prorated for the period of service provided during the quarter. 
 In addition to the foregoing cash compensation, the Director Compensation Program provides for each non-employee director to receive: 
  

	 	•	 	 An award of restricted stock units of Embarq (“Embarq RSUs”) with a grant date value of $150,000, in connection with the initial election to the Board,
vesting in full upon the third regular annual meeting of Embarq’s stockholders following the date of grant of such Embarq RSUs and with prorated acceleration of vesting in the event of a change in control, death, disability, retirement, or
involuntary separation from the Board; 


  

	 	•	 	 An award of Embarq RSUs with a grant date value of $75,000, on or about the date of each annual meeting of Embarq’s stockholders, which vest in full upon the
first annual stockholders’ meeting following the grant. With respect to this annual grant of Embarq RSUs, vesting will also be accelerated in full in the event of a change in control, death, disability, retirement, or involuntary separation
from the Board; and 


  

	 	•	 	 An annual telecommunications allowance in the amount of $6,000, which covers services, equipment and tax gross-ups. 


 The Director Compensation Program will remain in effect until changed by the Board.