alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4812 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 346

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4812

                          [Report No. 103-634]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To direct the Administrator of General Services to acquire by transfer 
the Old U.S. Mint in San Francisco, California, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             August 1, 1994

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

                                                 Union Calendar No. 346
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4812

                          [Report No. 103-634]

To direct the Administrator of General Services to acquire by transfer 
the Old U.S. Mint in San Francisco, California, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 21, 1994

Mr. Mineta (for himself and Ms. Pelosi) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Committee on Public Works and Transportation

                             August 1, 1994

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Administrator of General Services to acquire by transfer 
the Old U.S. Mint in San Francisco, California, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OLD U.S. MINT, SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA.

    Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Administrator of General Services shall take such actions as may be 
necessary to acquire by transfer, without consideration, the property 
referred to as the ``Old U.S. Mint'', located at Fifth and Mission 
Streets in San Francisco, California, together with any improvements, 
structures, and fixtures located on the property.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4721 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4721

To prohibit the Secretary of Agriculture from transferring any national 
forest system lands in the Angeles National Forest in California out of 
          Federal ownership for use as a solid waste landfill.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 12, 1994

 Mr. McKeon (for himself, Mr. Beilenson, Mr. Brown of California, Mr. 
   Calvert, Mr. Condit, Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Doolittle, Mr. Horn, Mr. 
  Hunter, Mr. Moorhead, Mr. Royce, Mr. Thomas of California, and Mr. 
   Roberts) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the Secretary of Agriculture from transferring any national 
forest system lands in the Angeles National Forest in California out of 
          Federal ownership for use as a solid waste landfill.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN TRANSFERS OF NATIONAL FOREST LANDS.

    After the date of the enactment of this Act the Secretary of 
Agriculture shall not transfer (by exchange or otherwise) any lands 
owned by the United States and managed by the Secretary as part of the 
Angeles National Forest to any person unless the instrument of 
conveyance contains a restriction, enforceable by the Secretary, on the 
future use of such land prohibiting the use of any portion of such land 
as a solid waste landfill. Such restriction shall be promptly enforced 
by the Secretary when and if a violation of the restriction occurs.
                                 <all>
```
No. 11-5632.

#### Watson *v.*LaValley, Superintendent, Great Meadow Correctional Facility, et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certio-rari denied.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Daou Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel J. Malcolm, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/    DANIEL J.
MALCOLM             
|Daniel J. Malcolm                    
|Chief Executive Officer and President



March
30, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Electronic Game Card, Inc. on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Linden Boyne,
Treasurer/Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Linden Boyne
----------------------------
Linden Boyne
Secretary / Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)


August __, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 211.7 Obligation of carriers. ( a ) During the continuance of a war in which the United States is engaged, and when the provisions of this part are invoked, all carriers shall accord restoration priority assignments certified pursuant to this part priority over all other circuits.
( b ) To promote the national interest and defense preparedness, carriers shall: ( 1 ) Maintain such records of restoration priority assignments certified pursuant to this part as may be necessary to enable prompt implementation;
( 2 ) Enter into agreements, to the extent possible, with their foreign correspondents to effect restoration of the foreign portion of leased international services in accordance with this part;
( 3 ) Notify the Executive Agent of foreign correspondent procedures affecting Federal Government services that are not reasonably consistent with the priority requirements of this part.
#### Matter of Proceedings Supplementary, Harry Kriegman, Plaintiff and Judgment Creditor, *v.*Richard J. Dumphy, as Attorney in Fact, etc., Defendant.

(City Court of New York, Special Term,

February, 1910.)

Supplementary proceedings — Judgments or orders on which proceedings may he based—■ Judgment against attorneys in fact.

Supplementary proceedings are not maintainable' upon a judgment recovered against a defendant in a representative capacity as attorney in fact for several individuals as underwriters.

*It seems,*that the remedy of the judgment creditor is an action against the individual underwriters pursuant to ' section 1922 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Motion to vacate a subpoena.

Nathaniel Tonkin, for judgment creditor.

Holmes J ones, for Richard J. Dumphy.

O’Dwyer, Ch. J.

The judgment recovered is against the defendant in his representative capacity and obtained pursuant to the provision of section 1919, Code of Civil Procedure. Hpon such a judgment proceedings supplementary to execution may not be maintained. Code Civ. Pro., §§ 1921, 2458. It would seem that the only relief afforded a plaintiff recovering a judgment against an attorney in fact representing several individuals as underwriters of the New York and New England Underwriters at Lloyds of New York city is by action against the individuals pursuant to section 1922, Code of Civil Procedure.

Motion to vacate subpoena granted. No costs.
#### § 25.256 Special Requirements for operations in the 3.65-3.7 GHz band.

Upon request from a terrestrial licensee authorized under subpart Z, part 90 that seeks to place base and fixed stations in operation within 150 km of a primary earth station, licensees of earth stations operating on a primary basis in the Fixed-Satellite Service in the 3.65-3.7 GHz band must negotiate in good faith with that terrestrial licensee to arrive at mutually agreeable operating parameters to prevent unacceptable interference.

[70 FR 24725, May 11, 2005, as amended at 78 FR 8430, Feb. 6, 2013]
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**MOSSIMO, INC.**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Mossimo, Inc. (theCompany) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the Report), I Mossimo Giannulli, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)         The Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1,fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition, results of operations, and cashflows of the Company.
| /s/ MOSSIMO GIANNULLI                                                         |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Mossimo  Giannulli*Chairman and Chief Executive Officer*  March 31, 2006 |

 

A SIGNED ORIGINALOF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THECOMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION STAFF UPONREQUEST.

THIS CERTIFICATIONACCOMPANIES THE FORM 10-K TO WHICH IT RELATES, IS NOT DEEMED FILEDWITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION AND IS NOT TO BE INCORPORATED BYREFERENCE INTO A FILING OF THE COMPANY UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OR THESECURITIES ACT OF 1934 (WHETHER MADE BEFORE OR AFTER THE DATE OF THE FORM 10-K),IRRESPECTIVE OF ANY GENERAL INCORPORATION LANGUAGE CONTAINED IN SUCH FILING.

----
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 13

- 4464

_____________________________

T YLER S HERMAN ,
Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA ,
Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. James C. Hankinson , Judge

.
May 16, 2019

O N R EMAND FROM F LORIDA S UPREME C OURT

P ER C URIAM

.
We twice earlier affirmed Appellant’s separate convictions for solicitation (in violation of section 847.0135(3)(a), Florida Statutes), and traveling to meet a minor after solicitation (in violation of section 847.0135(4)(a)). See Sherman v. State , 160 So. 3d 494 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015); Sherman v. State

, 247 So. 3d 663 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). The Florida Supreme Court has now quashed our more recent decision, remanding for reconsideration in light of Lee v. State , 258 So. 3d 1297 (Fla. 2018)

. See Sherman v. State , No. SC18

- 949 (Fla. Apr. 16, 2019). In Lee , the court held that “to determine whether multiple convictions of solicitation of a minor, unlawful use of a two

- way communications device, and traveling after solicitation of a minor are based upon the same con duct for2 purposes of double jeopardy, the reviewing court should consider only the charging document.” 258 So. 3d at 1299. Applying that rule here, we must reverse the lesser conviction. On remand, the trial court should resentence for the remaining convic tion. We otherwise affirm.

R EVERSED in part; A FFIRMED in part.

W OLF and W INSOR , JJ., concur ; M AKAR , J., concurs in result only

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Ethan Andrew Way of Gillis Way & Campbell, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Angela R. Hensel

, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
No. 11-8953.

#### Vinson *v.*United States Marshals Service et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 154 (Thursday, August 10, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 45841]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6827]



[[Page 45841]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel; DD-75 HEMBY--(1R01AA016703-01).
    Date: August 28, 2006.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Sathasiva B. Kandasamy, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Extramural Project Review Branch, Office of 
Scientific Affairs, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism, Bethesda, MD 20892-9304, (301) 443-2926, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6e1d050f000a0f1d0f2e030f07024000070640090118"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="225149434c46435143624f434b4e0c4c4b4a0c454d54">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 1, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-6827 Filed 8-9-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 69.302 Net investment. ( a ) Investment in Accounts 2001, 1220 and Class B Rural Telephone Bank Stock booked in Account 1410 shall be apportioned among the interexchange category, billing and collection category and appropriate access elements as provided in §§ 69.303 through 69.309.
( b ) Investment in Accounts 2002, 2003 and to the extent such inclusions are allowed by this Commission, Account 2005 shall be apportioned on the basis of the total investment in Account 2001, Telecommunications Plant in Service.
[52 FR 37312, Oct. 6, 1987, as amended at 54 FR 3456, Jan. 24, 1989; 67 FR 5703, Feb. 6, 2002]
#### § 22.731 Emission limitations.

Upon application for multichannel operation, the FCC may authorize emission bandwidths wider than those specified in § 22.357, provided that spectrum utilization is equal to or better than that achieved by single channel operation.
§ 302-9.143 When I am authorized to transport a POV, may I have the manufacturer or the manufacturer's agent transport a new POV from the factory or other shipping point directly to my post of duty? Yes, when you are authorized to transport a POV, you may have the manufacture or the manufacturer's agent transport a new POV from the factory or other shipping point directly to your post of duty provided: ( a ) You purchased the POV new from the manufacturer or manufacturer's agent;
( b ) The POV is transported Free on Board (FOB)—shipping point, consigned to you and/or a member of your immediate family, or your agent; and
( c ) Ownership of the POV is not vested in the manufacturer or the manufacturer's agent during transportation. In this circumstance, you will be reimbursed for the POV transportation costs, not to exceed the cost of transporting the POV from your authorized point of origin to your post of duty.
[FTR Amdt. 98, 66 FR 58196, Nov. 20, 2001, as amended by FTR Amdt. 2018-01, 83 FR 30078, June 27, 2018]
[Civ. No. 1800.

Third Appellate District.

April 9, 1918.]

#### GRAVELLY FORD CANAL COMPANY (a Corporation), Appellant, v. POPE & TALBOT LAND COMPANY (a Corporation), Respondent.

Parol License—Construction of Canal—Injunction.—Judgment reversed on the authority of *Gravelly Ford Canal Co.*v. *Pope Talbot Land Co., ante,*p. 717.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Madera County. Wm. M. Conley, Judge.

*818The facts are similar to those stated in *Gravelly Ford Canal Co.*v. *Pope & Talbot Land Co., ante,*p. 717.

Edward F. Treadwell, for Appellant.

J. W. Dorsey, and W. E. Cashman, for Respondent.

CHIPMAN, P. J.

This is an action in which a temporary injunction was granted in the same case as No. 1801, in which latter a permanent injunction was granted. Apparently the matter was heard upon the same record in both cases, except certain maps are found in No. 1800 not attached to the record in No. 1801.

We have considered the questions involved in dealing with the permanent injunction in No. 1801, which would seem to make it unnecessary to consider at any length the questions involved in No. 1800, for they are practically the same in both cases.

On the authority of the case No. 1801, the judgment is reversed.

Hart, J., and Burnett, J., concurred.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court June 6, 1918.
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.1159 Filing locations and receipts for regulatory fees. ( a ) Regulatory fee payments must be directed to the location and address set forth in §§ 1.1152 through 1.1156 for the specific category of fee involved. Any regulatory fee required to be submitted with an application must be filed as a part of the application package accompanying the application. The Commission will not take responsibility for matching fees, forms and applications submitted at different times or locations.
( b ) Petitions for reconsideration or applications for review of fee decisions submitted with a standard regulatory fee payment pursuant to §§ 1.1152 through 1.1156 of the rules are to be filed with the Commission's lockbox bank in the manner set forth in §§ 1.1152 through 1.1156 for payment of the fee subject to the petition for reconsideration or the application for review. Petitions for reconsideration and applications for review that are submitted with no accompanying payment should be filed with the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, Attention: Managing Director, Washington, D.C. 20554.
( c ) Any request for exemption from a regulatory fee shall be filed with the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, Attention: Managing Director, Washington, D.C. 20554, except that requests for exemption accompanied by a tentative fee payment shall be filed at the lockbox set forth for the appropriate service in §§ 1.1152 through 1.1156.
( d ) The Commission will furnish a receipt for a regulatory fee payment only upon request. In order to obtain a receipt for a regulatory fee payment, the package must include an extra copy of the Form FCC 159 or, if a Form 159 is not required with the payment, a copy of the first page of the application or other filing submitted with the regulatory fee payment, submitted expressly for the purpose of serving as a receipt for the regulatory fee payment and application fee payment, if required. The document should be clearly marked “copy” and should be the top document in the package. The copy will be date stamped immediately and provided to the bearer of the submission, if hand delivered. For submissions by mail, the receipt copy will be provided through return mail if the filer has attached to the receipt copy a stamped self-addressed envelope of sufficient size to contain the receipt document.
( e ) The Managing Director may issue annually, at his discretion, a Public Notice setting forth the names of all commercial regulatees that have paid a regulatory fee and shall publish the Public Notice in the Federal Register.
[60 FR 34032, June 29, 1995, as amended at 62 FR 59825, Nov. 5, 1997]