alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Burlington WA Corporate Office 1620 S Walnut St - 98233 800.755.9295 $ 360.757.1400 Bellingham WA Microbiology 805 Orchard Dr Ste 4 - 98225 360.671.0688 Portland OR Microbiology/Chemistry 9150 SW Pioneer Ct Ste W- 97070 503.682.7802
June 23, 2011 Page 1 of 1 Ms. Nicole Polarolo Aluminum Co. of America PO BOX 150 Massena, NY 13662 The following comments are reported for your project: Your project: HAP Metals, Hex Chromium, was received on Friday May 27, 2011. Dear Ms. Nicole Polarolo, RE: 11-08082 - HAP Metals, Hex Chromium All analytes were reported as received. 17600 liquidsample was non - detect for hexavalent chromium. The sample was diluted at a 20 x dilution to confirm the matrix interference and the recovery to the LFM was there but low. Respectfully Submitted, If you have questions phone us at 800 755-9295.

Chain of Custody QC Reports Data Report Enclosures Lawrence J Henderson, PhD Director of Laboratories

FORM: COVER
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4354

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to prohibit the buying and

selling of social security account numbers.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 5, 1994

Mr. GALLO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to prohibit

the buying and selling of social security account numbers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF BUYING AND SELLING

4 OF SOCIAL SECURITY ACCOUNT NUMBERS.

5 Section 208(a) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

6 408(a)) is amended—

7 (1) in paragraph (8), by adding ‘‘or’’ at the

8 end; and

9 (2) by inserting after paragraph (8) the follow10 ing new paragraph:
2

•HR 4354 IH

1 ‘‘(9) buys, sells, offers for sale, transfers, takes

2 or gives in exchange, or pledges or gives in pledge

3 any information for the purpose, in whole or in part,

4 of conveying by means of such information the social

5 security account number of any other person, or any

6 derivative of such number, without the written con7 sent of such other person;’’.

8 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

9 The amendments made by section 1 shall apply with

10 respect to violations occuring on or after the date of the

11 enactment of this Act.

Æ
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4751

AN ACT

To reauthorize appropriations for the weatherization program

under section 422 of the Energy Conservation and Production Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 422 of the Energy Conservation and Produc4 tion Act (42 U.S.C. 6872) is amended to read as follows:

5 ‘‘AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS

6 ‘‘SEC. 422. For the purposes of carrying out the

7 weatherization program under this part, there are author8 ized to be appropriated for fiscal years 1995 and 1996

9 such sums as may be necessary.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives August 8,

1994.

Attest:

Clerk.
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4751

AN ACT

To reauthorize appropriations for the weatherizaConservation and Production Act. tion program under section 422 of the Energy
§ 8.205 Cybersecurity labeling authorization. ( a ) Cybersecurity labeling authorization is an authorization issued by a Cybersecurity Label Administrator (CLA) and authorized under the authority of the Commission, which grants an applicant of a complying consumer IoT product to display the FCC IoT Label on the relevant packaging for the complying consumer product, based on compliance with the program requirements as determined by the CLA.
( b ) Cybersecurity labeling authorization attaches to all units of the complying consumer IoT product subsequently marketed by the grantee that are identical (see § 8.206) to the sample determined to comply with the program requirements except for permissive changes or other variations authorized by the Commission.
No. 10-10934.

#### Matherly *v.*Johns, Warden.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
§ 32.7500 Interest and related items. ( a ) This account shall include the current accruals of interest on all classes of funded debt the principal of which is includable in Account 4200, Long term debt and funded debt. It shall also include the interest on funded debt the maturity of which has been extended by specific agreement. This account shall be kept so that the interest on each class of funded debt may be shown separately in the annual reports to this Commission.
( b ) These accounts shall not include charges for interest on funded debt issued or assumed by the company and held by or for it, whether pledged as collateral or held in its treasury, in special deposits or in sinking or other funds.
( c ) Interest expressly provided for and included in the face amount of securities issued shall be charged at the time of issuance to Account 1280, Prepayments, and cleared to this account as the term expires to which the interest applies.
( d ) This account shall also include monthly amortization of balances in Account 4200, Long-term debt and funded debt.
( e ) This account shall include the interest portion of each finance lease and capitalized operating lease payment.
( f ) This account shall include the monthly amortization of the balances in Account 1410, Other noncurrent assets.
( g ) This account shall include all interest deductions not provided for elsewhere, e.g., discount, premium, and expense on notes maturing one year or less from date of issue.
( h ) A list of representative items of indebtedness, the interest on which is chargeable to this account, follows: ( 1 ) Advances from affiliated companies;
( 2 ) Advances from nonaffiliated companies and other liabilities;
( 3 ) Assessments for public improvements past due;
( 4 ) Bond coupons, matured and unpaid;
( 5 ) Claims and judgments;
( 6 ) Customers' deposits;
( 7 ) Funded debt mature, with respect to which a definite agreement as to extension has not been made;
( 8 ) Notes payable on demand or maturing one year or less from date of issue;
( 9 ) Open accounts;
( 10 ) Tax assessments, past due; and
( 11 ) Discount, premium, and issuance expense of notes maturing one year or less from date of issue.
[67 FR 5699, Feb. 6, 2002, as amended at 84 FR 4730, Feb. 19, 2019]
No. 11-5167.

#### Greenspan *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist., Div. 1. Certiorari denied.
Direct Dial: 435.634.3530 

Direct Fax: 435.634.3505 

e-mail: temerson@skywest.com 

March4, 2014 

VIA E-Mail Richard.Goodwin@dot.gov 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Rm El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Case No. 2011NM060038 

Case No. 2011NM060047 

Case No. 2011NM060063 

Case No. 2011NM060072 

Case No. 2011NM060073 

Case No. 2011NM060081 

Case No. 2011NM060095 

Case No. 2012NM060014 

Dear Judge Goodwin: 

DMS No. FAA-2012-0874 

DMS No. FAA-2012-0872 

DMS No. FAA-2012-0873 

DMS No. FAA-2012-0869 

DMS No. FAA-2012-0868 

DMS No. FAA-2012-0904 

DMS No. FAA-2013-0617 

DMS No. FAA-2013-0619 

RECElVED 

MAR 1 t 2014 

HEARING DOCKET 

On January 31, 2014, all parties executed a Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings on the 

above-referenced cases. We advised you that global settlement negotiations were ongoing, 

and if we were unable to resolve these matters, we would proceed to trial. 

You informed me on February l21

h, at a hearing on another matter, that your 

calendar is free at the end of May 2014 and also the first two weeks ofJune 2014. 

Although Sky West wishes to continue settlement efforts, a key expert witness for 

Sky West will be unavailable after July 1, 2014. As such, Sky West asks that three (3) days 

444 South River Road !1 St. George, Utah 84790 1! Phone 435.634.3000 ;/ www.skywest.com 
The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

March 4, 2014 

Page 2 

be set aside on your calendar in the May-June timefrarne for the hearing on this matter. 

TCE/jb 

cc: Jeffrey Harper 

Michael L. Dworkin 

~rely, 

l~u c LLYYI/ 

Todd C. Emers 

Director:- Government and Legal Affairs 

Patricia Matthews (Patricia.Matthews@dot.gov) 

Hearing Docket Clerk
No. 11-9883.

No. 11-9913.

#### Augustine *v.*United States; and Batiste et al. *v.*United States.

C. A. llth Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 661 F. 3d 1105.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6642

In Re: JAMAL A. AZEEZ,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-00-54)

Submitted: June 19, 2002 Decided: July 10, 2002

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jamal Azeez, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jamal A. Azeez petitions this court for a writ of mandamus to

compel the district court to rule on his pending petition under 28

U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). The granting of a writ

of mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used in extraordinary

circumstances. In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987).

Azeez’s petition does not set forth exceptional circumstances as

would warrant the issuance of a writ of mandamus at this time. We

note, however, that no significant action has been taken in the

district court for over seven months.

Accordingly, we deny Azeez’s mandamus petition without

prejudice to his refiling it should the district court fail to act

within a reasonable time. We grant Azeez’s application to proceed

on appeal in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANDRES DE JESUS MEJIA-CASTILLO; et 

al., 

Petitioners, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 20-73716 

Agency Nos. A209-835-409 

A209-835-408 

A209-838-699 

A209-838-700 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 14, 2023**

Before: SILVERMAN, SUNG, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges. 

Andres De Jesus Mejia-Castillo and three family members, natives and 

citizens of El Salvador, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reconsider. Our jurisdiction is 

governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 20 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 20-73716 

motion to reconsider. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791 (9th Cir. 2005). 

We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to 

reconsider where they failed to identify any error of law or fact in the prior 

decision. See Ma v. Ashcroft, 361 F.3d 553, 558 (9th Cir. 2004) (“A petitioner’s 

motion to reconsider must identify a legal or factual error in the BIA’s prior 

decision.”); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1) (same).

We lack jurisdiction to consider any challenge to the BIA’s August 31, 

2020, order dismissing petitioners’ appeal from an immigration judge’s decision 

denying their applications for asylum and related relief because petitioners did not 

file a petition for review as to that order. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1); MartinezSerrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1258 (9th Cir. 1996) (time limit for filing a petition 

for review is “mandatory and jurisdictional”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
#### § 76.227 [Reserved]
§ 30.404 Emission limits. ( a ) The mean power of emissions must be attenuated below the mean output power of the transmitter in accordance with the following schedule: ( 1 ) When using transmissions other than those employing digital modulation techniques: ( i ) On any frequency removed from the assigned frequency by more than 50 percent up to and including 100 percent of the authorized bandwidth: At least 25 decibels;
( ii ) On any frequency removed from the assigned frequency by more than 100 percent up to and including 250 percent of the authorized bandwidth: At least 35 decibels;
( iii ) On any frequency removed from the assigned frequency by more than 250 percent of the authorized bandwidth: At least 43 + 10 Log10 (mean output power in watts) decibels, or 80 decibels, whichever is the lesser attenuation.
( 2 ) When using transmissions employing digital modulation techniques in situations not covered in this section: ( i ) In any 1 MHz band, the center frequency of which is removed from the assigned frequency by more than 50 percent up to and including 250 percent of the authorized bandwidth: As specified by the following equation but in no event less than 11 decibels: A = 11 + 0.4(P−50) + 10 Log10 B. (Attenuation greater than 56 decibels or to an absolute power of less than −13 dBm/1MHz is not required.)
( ii ) In any 1 MHz band, the center frequency of which is removed from the assigned frequency by more than 250 percent of the authorized bandwidth: At least 43 + 10 Log10 (the mean output power in watts) decibels, or 80 decibels, whichever is the lesser attenuation. The authorized bandwidth includes the nominal radio frequency bandwidth of an individual transmitter/modulator in block-assigned bands. Equipment licensed prior to April 1, 2005 shall only be required to meet this standard in any 4 kHz band.
( iii ) The emission mask in paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section applies only to the band edge of each block of spectrum, but not to subchannels established by licensees. The value of P in the equation is the percentage removed from the carrier frequency and assumes that the carrier frequency is the center of the actual bandwidth used. The emission mask can be satisfied by locating a carrier of the subchannel sufficiently far from the channel edges so that the emission levels of the mask are satisfied. The emission mask shall use a value B (bandwidth) of 40 MHz, for all cases even in the case where a narrower subchannel is used (for instance the actual bandwidth is 10 MHz) and the mean output power used in the calculation is the sum of the output power of a fully populated channel. For block assigned channels, the out-of-band emission limits apply only outside the assigned band of operation and not within the band.
( b ) [Reserved]
[LOGO] KPMG
                P.O. Box 7108
                401 N. 31st Street
                Billings, MT  59103


                          Independent Auditors' Consent
                          -----------------------------



The Board of Directors
Crazy Woman Creek Bancorp Incorporated

We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statement  (No.
333-53543) on Form S-8 of Crazy Woman Creek Bancorp  Incorporated  of our report
dated  November 6, 2002  relating to the  consolidated  balance  sheets of Crazy
Woman Creek  Bancorp  Incorporated  and  subsidiary as of September 30, 2002 and
2001 and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity and
comprehensive  income,  and cash flows for the years then  ended,  which  report
appears in the  September  30, 2002 annual  report on Form 10-KSB of Crazy Woman
Creek Bancorp Incorporated.


                                        /s/KPMG LLP


Billings, Montana
December 26, 2002



[LOGO]  KPMG LLP. KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, is
        a member of KPMG International, a Swiss association.
3308 Oak Grove Avenue ◊ Dallas, Texas 75204 ◊ (214) 741-6260 ◊Fax (214) 741-6248 

www.johnstontobey.com 

October 13, 2015 

By Efiling 

Abel Acosta 

Clerk, Court of Criminal Appeals 

Post Office Box 12308, Capitol Station 

Austin, Texas 78711 

 RE: State v. Albert G. Hill III 

 PD-0019-15; PD-0020-15; PD-0021-15; PD-0022-15

Dear Mr. Acosta: 

 I will appear to argue for the State of Texas on November 4, 2015, at 9:00 a.m. 

 Respectfully, 

 /s/Charles “Chad” Baruch 

copies: Michael Mowla (michael@mowlalaw.com) 

 Robert Udashen (rnu@sualaw.com) 

PD-0019-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 10/13/2015 11:24:40 AM

Accepted 10/13/2015 11:31:43 AM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 30, 2009 

1217 

Order 

 

December 30, 2009 

138091 

MICHAEL C. LEE, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 138091 

 COA: 274530 

Wayne CC: 05-502988-CD 

CITY OF DETROIT, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On December 9, 2009, the Court heard oral argument on the application for leave 

to appeal the December 4, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the 

Court, the application is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 KELLY, C.J., and HATHAWAY, J., would grant leave to appeal.
652 Oliver Street 

Williamsport, PA. 17701 U.S.A. SERVICE

INSTRUCTION Tel. 570-323-6181 

Fax. 570-327-7101 

www.lycoming.com 

DATE: June 15, 2007 Service Instruction No. 1343B 

(Supersedes Service Instruction No. 1343A) 

Engineering Aspects are 

FAA Approved

SUBJECT: Set Screw for Propeller Governor Idler Shaft 

MODELS AFFECTED: O, IO, LIO, AIO, AEIO-320 Series; O, LO, IO, LIO, AIO, AEIO, TO, TIO360 Series; O, IO, AEIO, TIO, LTIO-540 Series; IO-580 Series; IO-720 Wide 

Cylinder Flange Engines that are equipped with a front crankcase mounted 

propeller governor. Wide cylinder flange engines are identified by the suffix 

“A” in the serial number. 

TIME OF COMPLIANCE: At next overhaul. 

 Applicable engines in service that still utilize a P/N MS-9048-111 spring pin to secure the propeller

governor idler shaft must be reworked to incorporate a 10-32 set screw. This is accomplished by drilling and 

tapping the existing spring pinhole as shown in Figure 1. To allow access for peening the set screw in place 

during reassembly, the area around the hole must also be spot faced, if not already accomplished, as shown 

in Figure 2. 

 Engines that are built with the set screw incorporated are assembled with a P/N LW-14021 idler gear 

shaft. Engines that were built with the P/N MS-9048-111 spring pin incorporated a P/N 77876 idler gear 

shaft. Replace P/N 77876 idler gear shaft with a P/N LW-14021 idler gear shaft. 

 Prior to reassembling an engine with damaged threads in the set screw hole, retap the hole with a 10-32 

UNF-3B, P.D. .1697/.1726 inch tap. If necessary, to insure that there are adequate threads in the set screw 

hole to peen on top of the screw, select a screw that is shorter than the one that was previously removed. 

Refer to Table 1 for the applicable set screw part number and length. 

NOTE

In the following step, a smaller diameter center punch may be used if required to reach the 

top of a shorter set screw. The tip of a center punch utilized by Lycoming personnel for this 

purpose is ground to an approximate 50°/60° included angle. See Figure 3. 

 Assemble the idler gear shaft together with the idler gear and thrust washer and secure the idler gear shaft 

with the setscrew. Insure that the set screw enters the hole in the idler gear shaft before tightening the screw. 

Remove the set screw and apply a light coat of Loctite 290 to the screw. With a clean lint-free cloth, wipe 

away any excess Loctite 290. Install and tighten the set screw to hold the threaded end of the hex head plug 

securely in place within the idler gear shaft. Using a center punch with a 3/32-inch diameter shaft, at the top 

of the tapered point, peen the threads of the hole directly on top of the set screw to prevent the screw from 

backing out. See Figure 3. 

Page 1 of 3 

©2007 by Lycoming “All Rights Reserved” 
Service Instruction No. 1343B 

TABLE 1 

DESCRIPTION PART NUMBER

Set Screw – 10-32 x .19 inch long 

Set Screw – 10-32 x .25 inch long 

Set Screw – 10-32 x .31 inch long 

AN565B1032H3

AN565B1032H4

AN565B1032H5

Figure 1 

Figure 2 

Page 2 of 3 
Service Instruction No. 1343B 

Figure 3. 

Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Fahad Syed, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of NetFabric Holdings,
Inc. (the" Company").

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d 15 for the Company and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) [Reserved]

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal
quarter ( the Company's fourth fiscal quarter in case of an annual report) that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Company's auditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting.

November 20, 2006


                                     /s/ Fahad Syed
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Name: Fahad Syed
                                     Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer