alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.9


SUMMARY OF FEES FOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS


Each director of
Old Second Bancorp, Inc. also serves as a director of Old Second National Bank,
and may serve on boards of its other subsidiaries.  In 2006, non-employee directors received
$1,000 for every board meeting attended and $500 for each committee meeting
attended.  Non-employee directors of Old
Second National Bank received a $15,000 annual retainer and directors that also
serve as committee chair of the Audit, Compensation, or Governance committees
receive $18,000 annual retainer. 
Additionally, non-employee directors of Old Second Bank-Yorkville
received $500 for directors and $250 for directors emeriti per meeting, Old
Second Bank-Kane County receive $500 for directors and $300 for directors emeriti
per meeting, non-employee directors of Old Second Mortgage receive $300 per
meeting and non-employee directors of Old Second Management LLC receive $750
per meeting.


Non-employee
directors of Old Second National Bank are also eligible to receive options
pursuant to the Old Second Bancorp, Inc. 2002 Long Term Incentive Plan.  The Company also maintains the Old Second
Bancorp Directors Fee Deferral Plan, under which directors are permitted to
defer receipt of their directors’ fees. 
The plan is unqualified and the directors have no interest in the
trust.  The deferred fees and any
earnings thereon are unsecured obligations of Old Second.
No. 11-5698.

#### Arnold *v.*Ohio.

Ct. App. Ohio, Franklin County. Certiorari denied.
###### Editorial Note on [Part 74](/current/title-47/part-74?toc=1)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 74 appear at [64 FR 4055](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/64-FR-4055), Jan. 27, 1999.

#### § 74.536 Directional antenna required.

(a) Aural broadcast STL and ICR stations are required to use a directional antenna with the minimum beamwidth necessary, consistent with good engineering practice, to establish the link.

(b) An aural broadcast STL or intercity relay station operating in the 17.7-19.7 GHz band shall employ an antenna that meets the performance standards for Category A, except that in areas not subject to frequency congestion, antennas meeting standards for Category B may be employed. However, the Commission may require the replacement, at the licensee's expense, of any antenna or periscope antenna system of a permanent fixed station that does not meet performance Standard A, which is specified in the table in [paragraph (c)](/on/2024-09-20/title-47/section-74.536#p-74.536(c)) of this section, upon a showing that said antenna causes or is likely to cause interference to (or receive interference from) any other authorized or proposed station; provided that an antenna meeting performance Standard A is unlikely to involve such interference.

(c) Licensees shall comply with the antenna standards table shown in this paragraph in the following manner:

(1) With either the maximum beamwidth to 3 dB points requirement or with the minimum antenna gain requirement; and

(2) With the minimum radiation suppression to angle requirement.

Antenna Standards

| Frequency (GHz) | Category | Maximum beamwidth to 3 dB points1 (included angle in degrees) | Minimum antenna gain (dbi) | Minimum radiation suppression to angle in degrees from centerline of main beam in decibels | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 5° to 10° | 10° to 15° | 15° to 20° | 20° to 30° | 30° to 100° | 100° to 140° | 140° to 180° |
| 17.7 to 19.7 | A B | 2.2 2.2 | 38 38 | 25 20 | 29 24 | 33 28 | 36 32 | 42 35 | 55 36 | 55 36 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 If a licensee chooses to show compliance using maximum beamwidth to 3 dB points, the beamwidth limit shall apply in both the azimuth and the elevation planes. | | | | | | | | | | |

[[48 FR 50333](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/48-FR-50333), Nov. 1, 1983, as amended at [49 FR 7130](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/49-FR-7130), Feb. 27, 1984; [50 FR 48599](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/50-FR-48599), Nov. 26, 1985; [51 FR 19840](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/51-FR-19840), June 3, 1986; [62 FR 4922](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/62-FR-4922), Feb. 3, 1997; [68 FR 12767](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/68-FR-12767), Mar. 17, 2003]
No. 11-5190.

#### Smith *v.*Defense Logistics Agency et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-824.

#### Schafer, Guardian ad Litem for W. M. S., Infant *v.*Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4551 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4551

                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
 the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  four


                                 An Act

  
 
  To designate the United States Post Office building located at 301 
West Lexington Street in Independence, Missouri, as the ``William J. 
Randall Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States Post Office building located at 301 West 
Lexington Street in Independence, Missouri, shall be known and 
designated as the ``William J. Randall Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the William J. Randall Post 
Office.







                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.







                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.`
###### Editorial Note on Part 74

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 74 appear at 64 FR 4055, Jan. 27, 1999.

#### § 74.789 [Reserved]
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   Exhibit 10.19


                                   ASSIGNMENT


            THIS ASSIGNMENT is made the 4th day of August 1999, between Telxon
            Corporation of 3330 West Market Street, P.O. Box 5582, Akron, Ohio
            44334-0582, U.S.A., a Corporation of the State of Delaware
            (hereinafter called "the Assignor") of the one part, and


            Aironet WirelessCommunications, Inc. of 3875 Embassy Parkway,
            Akron, Ohio 44334-0292, U.S.A., a Corporation of the State of Ohio
            (hereinafter called "the Assignee") of the other part.


            WHEREAS the Assignor is the registered Applicant of European Patent
            Application No. 97931146.1 (hereinafter called "the Application")


            NOW THIS ASSIGNMENT WITNESSES and it is hereby agreed between the
            parties hereto as follows:


            In consideration of the sum of $10.00 now paid by the Assignee to
            the Assignor (the receipt of which sum the Assignor hereby
            acknowledges) the Assignor hereby assigns absolutely to the Assignee
            the Application, the right, title and interest therein in all
            Contracting States of the European Patent Convention, including all
            rights which may arise under s30(7) of the U.K. Patents Act 1977,
            the right to apply for, prosecute and obtain patent or similar
            protection throughout the world in respect of the invention claimed
            in the Application; and the right to claim priority therefrom to the
            intent that the grant of any patents or similar protection shall be
            in the name of and vest in the Assignee.

<PAGE>   2


            IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Assignor and the Assignee have executed this
            Assignment the day and year first above mentioned.



            Signed on behalf of the ASSIGNOR
            Telxon Corporation



            /s/Glenn S. Hansen
            ----------------------------
            Signature

            Glenn S. Hansen                 Vice President, Legal Administration
            ----------------------------    ------------------------------------
            Name                            Capacity


            Signed on behalf of the ASSIGNEE
            Aironet Wireless Communications, Inc.

            /s/Roger J. Murphy
            ----------------------------
            Signature


            Roger J. Murphy                 President & C.E.O.
            ----------------------------    ------------------------------------
            Name                            Capacity
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

 Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 92-463) and the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self determination Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-393), the Black Hills National Forest's Custer County Resource Advisory Committee will meet on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 in Custer, South Dakota for a business meeting. The meeting is open to the public.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The business meeting on August 15 will begin at 6 p.m. at the Black Hills National Forest Supervisor's office at 25041 North Highway 16, Custer, South Dakota. Agenda topics will include election of officers and discussion of potential projects.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mike Lloyd, Hell Canyon District Ranger and Designated Federal Officer, at 605-673-4853.

Dated: August 1, 2006.

Michael D. Lloyd,

District Ranger.

[FR Doc. 06-6704  Filed 8-4-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
#### Louisa B. White, Plaintiff, v. Henry White, Defendant.

(Supreme Court, New York Special Term,

March, 1910.)

Divorce — Trial — Nomination and qualifications of referee.

The parties to an action for divorce cannot agree upon a referee to take testimony to be used upon the reference ordered by the - court upon application for judgment.

Motion for judgment on report of referee in action for divorce.

Wm. H. Hamilton, for plaintiff.

Clarence J. Shearn, for defendant.

McCall, J.

An irregularity in proceeding is revealed by this record that forbids a confirmation of the referee’s conclusions and requires that the case be sent bach, reopened, and the proof taken in regular way. The specific act upon which plaintiff hopes to base a decree is alleged to have occurred in a city in the western part of the State, and the only evidence taken in regard thereto was of four witnesses who reside in that city. The testimony was adduced before a referee residing in that city and under stipulation of counsel, in which the name of the referee was set out and was of counsel’s selection, made without application to the .court. This proof so taken was embodied in the record taken before the referee appointed by the court and constitutes part of the means upon which the referee based his conclusion and made his report. The position taken by counsel for plaintiff, that such procedure is sanctioned by the law governing taking of 'depositions and is regular and proper, cannot he sustained.; and, while I am thoroughly satisfied that there is nothing suspicious in the method adopted, it nevertheless was clearly irregular and erroneous and cannot for a moment receive the sanction of the court. *593The motion to confirm report is therefore denied, and the matter is sent back to the referee with instructions to reopen the case, strike from the record' the testimony taken before the referee named in the stipulation and to give the plaintiff an opportunity to present her evidence in the regular and legal manner.

Motion denied.
No. 11-5401.

#### Vega *v.*Hardy, Warden.

C. A. 7th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
<PAGE>



                               CELADON GROUP, INC.

                                                               EXHIBIT 21

                                  Subsidiaries

SUBSIDIARY NAME                                      INCORPORATION JURISDICTION
---------------                                      --------------------------
Celadon Trucking Services, Inc.                                 NJ

Celadon Real Estate Corp.                                       DE

Celadon Trucking Services
         of Indiana, Inc.                                       IN

Celadon Transportation, LLP                                     IN

Celadon Air Mexicana                                            MX

Celadon Acquisition Corp.                                       IN

Celadon Container Services, Inc.                                MI

Celadon Express, Inc.                                           DE

Celadon Logistics, Inc.                                         DE

Celadon/Jacky Maeder Company                                    NY

Celadon/Jacky Maeder (UK) Ltd.                                  UK

Cheetah Brokerage Co.                                           NE

Cheetah Transportation Co.                                      DE

International Freight Holding Corp.                             DE

JML Freight Forwarding, Inc.                                    NY

Randy Express, Ltd.                                             NY

Randy International (U.K.) Limited                              UK

RIL Acquisition Corp.                                           DE

RIL Group, Inc.                                                 DE

RIL, Inc.                                                       DE

Servicio de Transportacion Jaguar, S.A. de C.V.                 MX

Skymex, Inc.                                                    DE

Wellingmuft Holding Co.                                         NY

147-95 Farmers Blvd., Inc.                                      DE

                                                              

                                       97







<PAGE>
No. 11-9456.

#### Alberts *v.*Wheeling Jesuit University et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
5 November 2015

132P15

#### State v. Randy Carter Davis

1. Defs Notice of Appeal Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COAI4-547)

1. Special Order

2. Defs PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

2. Special Order

3. Defs Motion to Deem Notice of Appeal and PDR Timely Filed

3. Special Order

4. Defs Petition in the Alternative for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Decision of COA

4. Special Order

5. State’s Motion to Dismiss Notice of Appeal

5. Special Order
#### § 101.1525 RF safety.

Licensees in the 70-80-90 GHz bands are subject to the exposure requirements found in §§ 1.1307(b), 2.1091 and 2.1093 of this chapter, and will use the parameters found therein.
§ 73.670 Commercial limits in children's programs. ( a ) No commercial television broadcast station licensee shall air more than 10.5 minutes of commercial matter per hour during children's programming on weekends, or more than 12 minutes of commercial matter per hour on weekdays.
( b ) The display of Internet Web site addresses during program material or promotional material not counted as commercial time is permitted only if the Web site: ( 1 ) Offers a substantial amount of bona fide program-related or other noncommercial content;
( 2 ) Is not primarily intended for commercial purposes, including either e-commerce or advertising;
( 3 ) The Web site's home page and other menu pages are clearly labeled to distinguish the noncommercial from the commercial sections; and
( 4 ) The page of the Web site to which viewers are directed by the Web site address is not used for e-commerce, advertising, or other commercial purposes (e.g., contains no links labeled “store” and no links to another page with commercial material).
( c ) If an Internet address for a Web site that does not meet the test in paragraph (b) of this section is displayed during a promotion in a children's program, in addition to counting against the commercial time limits in paragraph (a) of this section the promotion must be clearly separated from program material.
( d ) ( 1 ) Entities subject to commercial time limits under the Children's Television Act shall not display a Web site address during or adjacent to a program if, at that time, on pages that are primarily devoted to free noncommercial content regarding that specific program or a character appearing in that program: ( i ) Products are sold that feature a character appearing in that program; or
( ii ) A character appearing in that program is used to actively sell products.
( 2 ) The requirements of this paragraph do not apply to: ( i ) Third-party sites linked from the companies' Web pages;
( ii ) On-air third-party advertisements with Web site references to third-party Web sites; or
( iii ) Pages that are primarily devoted to multiple characters from multiple programs.
Note 1:
*Commercial matter* means air time sold for purposes of selling a product or service and promotions of television programs or video programming services other than children's or other age-appropriate programming appearing on the same channel or promotions for children's educational and informational programming on any channel.
Note 2:
For purposes of this section, children's programming refers to programs originally produced and broadcast primarily for an audience of children 12 years old and younger.
[70 FR 36, Jan. 3, 2005, as amended at 71 FR 64164, Nov. 1, 2006]
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

31) ll-K-(B)-19 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:49 AM Sheet 31 of 325 
P.2 

A 

II-K-(B)-19 

INVESTIGATION OF THE NATURE OF PEDCo'S DATA SOURCES FOR 

CONSTRUCTION OF ITS BOILER SIZE DISTRIBUTION FOR THE 

INDUSTRIAL BOILER NSPS STUDY. 

Letter from K.F. Held, EEA, to A. Wehe, EPArSASD. 

December 18, 1979. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(B)-19
# Time and Date:

11 a.m., Friday, September 22, 2006.

# Place:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# Status:

Closed.

# Matters to be Considered:

Surveillance Matters.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Eileen A. Donovan,

Acting Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 06-7047 Filed 8-16-06; 11:52 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
§ 64.1503 Termination of pay-per-call and other information programs. ( a ) Any common carrier assigning a telephone number to a provider of interstate pay-per-call service shall specify by contract or tariff that pay-per-call programs not in compliance with § 64.1502 shall be terminated following written notice to the information provider. The information provider shall be afforded a period of no less than seven and no more than 14 days during which a program may be brought into compliance. Programs not in compliance at the expiration of such period shall be terminated immediately.
( b ) Any common carrier providing transmission or billing and collection services to a provider of interstate information service through any 800 telephone number, or other telephone number advertised or widely understood to be toll-free, shall promptly investigate any complaint that such service is not provided in accordance with § 64.1504 or § 64.1510(c), and, if the carrier reasonably determines that the complaint is valid, may terminate the provision of service to an information provider unless the provider supplies evidence of a written agreement that meets the requirements of this § 64.1504(c)(1).
[61 FR 39087, July 26, 1996]
#### § 32.6562 Depreciation expense—property held for future telecommunications use.

This account shall include the depreciation expense of capitalized costs included in Account 2002, Property held for future telecommunications use.

[69 FR 53652, Sept. 2, 2004]
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 21


                   SUBSIDIARIES OF NATIONAL AUTO CREDIT, INC.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 State of                              Percent by
      Corporate Name                           Organization                    National Auto Credit, Inc.
     -----------------                      ------------------               -------------------------------
 <S>                                        <C>                              <C>
 ARAC, Inc. (1)                                  Delaware                                 100%

 NAC Capital, Inc.                               Delaware                                 100%

 NAC, Inc. (2)                                   Delaware                                 100%

 National Cinemas, Inc.                          Delaware                                 100%

 ZoomLot Corporation                             Delaware                                 100%
</TABLE>



      All of the subsidiaries listed above are included in the consolidated
financial statements of the Company. The Company also has various subsidiaries
which, when considered in the aggregate, do not constitute a significant
subsidiary.

(1)   Formerly operated under the name of Agency Rent-A-Car and its divisions,
      Altra Auto Rental, Automate Auto Rental and National Motors.

(2)   NAC, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ARAC, Inc.
Summary of Meeting with the National Mining Association

February 5, 2014

List of Attendees

Connie Bosma, EPA
Erika Farris, EPA
Bryan Rittenhouse, EPA
Greg Schaner, EPA
Mary Ellen Levine, EPA
Pete Ford, EPA

Jesse Pritts, EPA Ken Marcy, EPA (on phone)

Eva DeMaria, EPA (on phone)
Derek Schruhl, EPA (on phone)
Stacey Erickson, EPA (on phone)
Nelly Smith, EPA (on phone)
David Chung, Crowell & Moring
Kirsten Nathanson, Crowell & Moring
Joe Friedlander, North American Coal
Amanda Aspatore, National Mining Associ ation

Summary of Meeting

During the meeting, Joe Friedlander from North American Coal provided a presentation to EPA on the overlap between Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act (SMCRA) requirements and the Clean
Water Act (CWA).

T he National Mining Association (NMA) provided further context and information to support the
comments they submitted to the docket on the MSGP. NMA discussed their concerns about the
incorporation of the C&D rule requirements from the CGP into the MSGP for the mining sectors and

recommended that certain requirements be modified so that they take into account mining

- specific

issues. NMA also commented that the MSGP should better distinguish the construction requirements
from the active mining requirements.