alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*Title:*
                     Child Care and Development Fund Annual Aggregate Report.

*OMB No.:*
                     0970-0150.

*Description:*
                     Section 658K of the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101-508, 42 U.S.C. 9858) requires that the States and the Territories submit annual aggregate data on the children and families receiving direct services under the Child Care and Development Fund. The implementing regulations for the statutorily required reporting are at 45 CFR 98.70. Annual aggregate reports include data elements represented in the ACF-800. The Administration for Children and Families (ACF) uses aggregate data to determine the scope, type, and methods of child care delivery. This provides ACF with the information necessary to make reports to Congress, address national child care needs, offer technical assistance to grantees, meet performance measures, and conduct research. Consistent with the statute and regulations, ACF requests extension of the ACF-800.

*Respondents:*
                     States, the District of Columbia, and the Territories, including Puerto Rico, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, American Samoa, and the Northern Mariana Islands.

Annual Burden EstimatesInstrumentNumber of
                             respondentsNumber of
                             responses per respondentAverage 
                             burden hours per responseTotal burden hoursACF-800561402,240


*Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:*
                     2,240.

*Additional Information:*
                     Copies of the proposed collection may be obtained by writing to the Administration for Children and Families, Office of Administration, Office of Information Services, 370 L'Enfant Promenade, SW., Washington, DC 20447, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer. All requests should be identified by the title of the information collection. E-mail address: 
                    *infocollection@acf.hhs.gov*.

*OMB Comment:*
                     OMB is required to make a decision concerning the collection of information between 30 and 60 days after publication of this document in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    . Therefore, a comment is best assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of publication. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent directly to the following: Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503, attn: Desk Officer for ACF, e-mail address: 
                    *Katherine_T._Astrich@omb.eop.gov*.

Dated: August 14, 2006. Robert Sargis, Reports Clearance Officer.


[FR Doc. 06-7013 Filed 8-17-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Cityscape Financial Corp.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-8 of Cityscape Financial Corp. of our report dated February 28, 1997,
which report makes reference to the report of other auditors, relating to the
consolidated statements of financial condition of Cityscape Financial Corp. and
Subsidiary as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period then ended, which report appears in the December
31, 1996 annual report on Form 10-K of Cityscape Financial Corp.



                              KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

New York, New York
March 28, 1997
No. 11-9937.

#### Huy Chi Luong *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
----

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 770/2005 of 20 May 2005 on import licences in respect of beef and veal products originating in Botswana, Kenya, Madagascar, Swaziland, Zimbabwe and Namibia

(Official Journal of the European Union L 128 of 21 May 2005)

On Page 17, in the first sentence of Article 2:

for:

               ‘during the first 10 days of May 2005’,

read:

               ‘during the first 10 days of June 2005’.

----
§ 73.761 Modification of transmission systems. Specific authority, upon electronic filing of a formal application (FCC Form 309) therefor in the International Communications Filing System (ICFS), is required for any of the following changes: ( a ) Change involving an increase or decrease in the power rating of the transmitters.
( b ) A replacement of the transmitters as a whole.
( c ) Change in the location of the transmitting antenna.
( d ) Change in the power delivered to the antenna.
( e ) Change in frequency control and/or modulation system.
( f ) Change in direction or gain of antenna system.
( g ) Other changes, not specified above in this section, may be made at any time without the authority of the Commission: Provided, That the Commission shall be immediately notified electronically in ICFS thereof and such changes shall be shown in the next application for renewal of license.
[86 FR 54401, Oct. 1, 2021, as amended at 88 FR 21447, Apr. 10, 2023]
Editorial Note on Part 74
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 74 appear at 64 FR 4055, Jan. 27, 1999.

§ 74.763 Time of operation. ( a ) A low power TV or TV translator station is not required to adhere to any regular schedule of operation. However, the licensee of a TV translator station is expected to provide service to the extent that such is within its control and to avoid unwarranted interruptions in the service provided.
( b ) In the event that causes beyond the control of the low power TV or TV translator station licensee make it impossible to continue operating, the licensee may discontinue operation for a period of not more than 30 days without further authority from the FCC. Notification must be sent to the FCC via a Suspension of Operations Notice filing in LMS, not later than the 10th day of discontinued operation. During such period, the licensee shall continue to adhere to the requirements in the station license pertaining to the lighting of antenna structures. In the event normal operation is restored prior to the expiration of the 30 day period, the FCC shall be notified via a Resumption of Operations Notice filing in LMS of the date normal operations resumed. If causes beyond the control of the licensee make it impossible to comply within the allowed period, a request for Special Temporary Authority (see § 73.1635 of this chapter) shall be made to the FCC no later than the 30th day for such additional time as may be deemed necessary via LMS.
( c ) Failure of a low power TV or TV translator station to operate for a period of 30 days or more, except for causes beyond the control of the licensee, shall be deemed evidence of discontinuation of operation and the license of the station may be cancelled at the discretion of the FCC. Furthermore, the station's license will expire as a matter of law, without regard to any causes beyond control of the licensee, if the station fails to transmit broadcast signals for any consecutive 12-month period, notwithstanding any provision, term, or condition of the license to the contrary.
( d ) A television broadcast translator station shall not be permitted to radiate during extended periods when signals of the primary station are not being retransmitted.
[28 FR 13722, Dec. 14, 1963, as amended at 52 FR 7423, Mar. 11, 1987; 52 FR 31405, Aug. 20, 1987; 61 FR 28768, June 6, 1996; 63 FR 33879, June 22, 1998; 67 FR 13233, Mar. 21, 2002; 87 FR 58203, Sept. 23, 2022; 88 FR 30669, May 12, 2023]
Exhibit 32.1

<PAGE>

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     I, Angela Du, Chief Executive  Officer of China Mobility  Solutions,  Inc.,
certify  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350 as enacted by Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2005 (the "Periodic Report") which this statement accompanies fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of China
Mobility Solutions, Inc.


         Dated: November 7, 2005             /s/ Angela Du
                                             -----------------------------
                                             Angela Du,
                                             Chief Executive Officer


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating,  acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to China Mobility Solutions, Inc. and
will be  retained  by  China  Mobility  Solutions,  Inc.  and  furnished  to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.23


Non-Employee Director Compensation Summary


Momenta
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.’s (the “Company’s”) non-employee directors are
currently:  (i) Peter Barrett; (ii) Peter Barton Hutt;
(iii) Paul D. Goldenheim; (iv) Bennett M. Shapiro; (v) John K.
Clarke; (vi) Robert S. Langer, Jr.; (vii) Stephen T. Reeders;
(viii) Ram Sasisekharan; (ix) Marsha H. Fanucci; and (x) Alan L.
Crane. The compensation structure for the Company’s non-employee directors as
follows:


Grant
of Options Upon Appointment


Each
non-employee director appointed after the 2007 annual meeting of stockholders
will automatically receive an option to purchase up to 30,000 shares of the
Company’s common stock upon appointment to the Board. These options will vest
quarterly over the three years following the grant date, subject to such
director’s continued service on the Board.


Grant
of Additional Stock Options


In
connection with the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s annual
evaluation, non-employee directors who served on the Board during fiscal year
2006 and who will continue to serve on the Board during fiscal year 2007 will
be granted an option to purchase up to 19,200 shares of the Company’s common
stock at the 2007 annual meeting of stockholders. These options will vest
quarterly over the year following the grant date, subject to the non-employee
director’s continued service on the Board.


Payment
of Retainer Fee; Reimbursement of Travel and Other Expenses


In addition to an option grant, each
non-employee director is entitled to receive an annual retainer of $25,000 for
his or her service on the Board during 2007. Additional amounts will be paid as
follows:


	
  Position

  	
   

  	
  Additional

  Fees

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Non-Employee
  Chairman of the Board

  	
   

  	
  $25,000

  	
   

  
	
  Audit
  Committee Chair

  	
   

  	
  $10,000

  	
   

  
	
  Audit
  Committee Members (other than the Chair)

  	
   

  	
  $7,500

  	
   

  
	
  Compensation
  Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chairs and Members
  (no additional fees shall be paid to members serving on both the Compensation
  and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees)

  	
   

  	
  $5,000

  	
   

  
	
  Science
  Committee Chair

  	
   

  	
  $10,000

  	
   

  
	
  Science
  Committee Members

  	
   

  	
  $7,500

  	
   

  
	
  Additional Payments to Science
  Committee Chair and Members

  	
   

  	
  $3,000 for each
  all day

  session attended (up to

  a maximum of $15,000

  per year) that is in

  addition to the standard

  quarterly meetings of

  the Scientific Committee

  	
   

  



 


All retainer amounts
shall be paid quarterly during fiscal year 2007. Non-employee directors also
receive reimbursement for reasonable travel and other expenses in connection
with attending Board meetings during 2007.
§ 73.72 Operating during the experimental period. ( a ) An AM station may operate during the experimental period (the time between midnight and sunrise, local time) on its assigned frequency and with its authorized power for the routine testing and maintenance of its transmitting system, and for conducting experimentation under an experimental authorization, provided no interference is caused to other stations maintaining a regular operating schedule within such period.
( b ) No station licensed for “daytime” or “specified hours” of operation may broadcast any regular or scheduled program during this period.
( c ) The licensee of an AM station shall operate or refrain from operating its station during the experimental period as directed by the FCC to facilitate frequency measurements or for the determination of interference.
[43 FR 32780, July 28, 1978, as amended at 56 FR 64859, Dec. 12, 1991]
§ 69.155 Per-minute residual interconnection charge. ( a ) Local exchange carriers may recover a per-minute residual interconnection charge on originating access. The maximum such charge shall be the lower of: ( 1 ) The per-minute rate that would recover the total annual residual interconnection charge revenues permitted less the portion of the residual interconnection charge allowed to be recovered under § 69.153; or
( 2 ) The sum of the local switching, carrier common line and residual interconnection charges assessed on originating minutes on December 31, 1997, minus the local switching charges assessed on originating minutes, less the maximum amount allowed to be recovered under § 69.154(a).
( b ) To the extent that paragraph (a) of this section prohibits a local exchange carrier from recovering all of the residual interconnection charge revenues permitted, the residual may be collected through a per-minute charge on terminating access.
( c ) ( 1 ) No portion of the charge assessed pursuant to paragraphs (a) or (b) of this section that recovers revenues that the local exchange carrier anticipates will be reassigned to other, facilities-based rate elements, including the tandem-switching rate element described in § 69.111(g), the three-part tandem switched transport rate structure described in § 69.111(a)(2), and port and multiplexer charges described in § 69.111(l), shall be assessed upon minutes utilizing the local exchange carrier's local switching facilities, but not the local exchange carrier's transport service.
( 2 ) If a local exchange carrier cannot recover its full residual interconnection charge revenues through the PICC mechanism established in § 69.153, and will consequently cover a portion of its residual interconnection charge revenues through per-minute charges assessed pursuant to paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, then the local exchange carrier must allocate its residual interconnection charge revenues subject to the exemption established in paragraph (c)(1) of this section between the PICC and the per-minute residual interconnection charge in the same proportion as other residual interconnection charge revenues are allocated between these two recovery mechanisms.
[62 FR 31938, June 11, 1997; 62 FR 40460, July 29, 1997, as amended at 62 FR 56133, Oct. 29, 1997]
[Civ. No. 1476.

Second Appellate District.

February 7, 1914.]

#### F. M. SAYRE, Respondent, v. SAN PEDRO, LOS ANGELES & SALT LAKE RAILROAD COMPANY (a Corporation), Appellant.

Action for Negligence—Allegation of Contributory Negligence— Findings That Allegations are True—Judgment for Defendant.—Where, in an action against a railroad company for damages on account of a collision of a freight car with the plaintiff’s automobile, the defendant alleges that the injuries sustained by the plaintiff were due to his own negligence, and it is found “that all of the affirmative allegations of the defendant’s answer are true,” and “that paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5” (presumably of the complaint) are true, the defendant is entitled to judgment on the findings.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Gavin W. Craig, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

A. S. Halsted, and W. F. Palmer, for Appellant.

W. H. Stevens, and Chas. S. McKelvey, for Respondent.

SHAW, J.

Action for damages alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff on account of the negligent operation of a freight car over defendant’s railway track, as a result of which it collided with an automobile valued at five thousand dollars, driven by plaintiff, demolishing the same and injuring plaintiff to his damage in the sum of ten thousand dollars. The court gave judgment for plaintiff in the sum of one thousand dollars, from which defendant appeals.

In addition to specific denials of the allegations of the complaint, defendant, as a separate defense and by affirmative allegations, alleged that the damage sustained by plaintiff was due to'his own negligence, alleged to be the proximate cause of the injury.

The court found “that paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 are true”; but since both the complaint and answer contain paragraphs so numbered, it is impossible to determine from the finding whether it refers to the complaint or answer. Con*774ceding that in support of the judgment we might indulge the presumption that the finding hai reference to the complaint, such fact cannot aid the respondent, for the reason that the court specifically found “that ¡i I of thq affirmative allegations of the defendant’s answer ;>re true.” It thus clearly and unequivocally appears from Hie finding that the damage found to have been sustained by the plaintiff was caused by his own negligence as alleged in the answer.

Not only are the findings insufficient to support the judgment, hut it is apparent therefrom that defendant is entitled to judgment thereon.

It is, therefore, ordered that the judgment be reversed and the trial court directed, upon the going down of the *remittitur,*to enter judgment upon the findings in favor of defendant.

Conrey, P. J., and James, *J.,*<:incurred.
H. R. 4790

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four

An Act

To designate the United States courthouse under construction in St. Louis, Missouri,

as the ‘‘Thomas F. Eagleton United States Courthouse’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The United States courthouse under construction at 111 South

Tenth Street in St. Louis, Missouri, shall be known and designated

as the ‘‘Thomas F. Eagleton United States Courthouse’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the United States courthouse

referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the

‘‘Thomas F. Eagleton United States Courthouse’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
.-- f -

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC

TRAVEL GROUP, INC., D/B/A REPUBLIC AIR TRAVEL

AND SCOT SPENCER

AIRLIFT GROUP, INC.

AND RICHARD BERNARD

DOT -OST -1995-272

formerly Docket 49233

Unauthorized Air Transportation,

Unfair and Deceptive Practices and Unfair Methods of

Competition, and Violations of Public Charter Rules

EXPRESS ONE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Unfair and Deceptive Practices and Unfair Methods of

Competition, and Violations of Public Charter Rules

Enforcement Proceeding

STATUS REPORT

The Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and

Proceedings ("Enforcement Office"), pursuant to Your Honor's March 22, 2006, Order

staying this proceeding, files this report detailing the current status of this proceeding and

settlement negotiations.

The Department has not ruled on the outstanding motions filed by Respondents

and opposed by the Enforcement Office in Ascend Aviation Group, Docket OST-2004-

17486.
2

There have been no further settlement discussions.

Date: April 30, 2014

Vinh Q. Nguyen

Senior Trial Attorney

United States Department of Transportation

Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Room 96-429

Washington, D.C. 20590

TEL: 202-366-9342

FAX: 202-366-7152

--~~--~
3

Docket No. DOT-OST-1995-272

I hereby certify that on this 30th day of April, 2014, a true and correct copy ofthe

foregoing Status Report was served in the following manner to the following:

Original

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Operations, M-30

West Building Ground Floor

Room W12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

By First Class Mail

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder

Chief Administrative Law Judge

Office of Hearings, M-20

U.S. Department of Transportation

Washington, D.C. 20590

TEL: (202) 366-2142

FAX: (202) 366-7536

By First Class Mail

Scot Spencer

SBD Aircraft Services

255 S Leland Norton Way

Sam Bernardino, CA 92408

Scot Spencer

22604 Esplanada Circle

Boca Raton, Florida 33433
§ 64.6219 Whistleblower protections. ( a ) NDBEDP certified programs shall permit, without reprisal in the form of an adverse personnel action, purchase or contract cancellation or discontinuance, eligibility disqualification, or otherwise, any current or former employee, agent, contractor, manufacturer, vendor, applicant, or recipient, to disclose to a designated official of the certified program, the NDBEDP Administrator, the TRS Fund Administrator, the Commission, or to any federal or state law enforcement entity, any known or suspected violations of the Communications Act or Commission rules, or any other activity that the reporting person reasonably believes to be unlawful, wasteful, fraudulent, or abusive, or that otherwise could result in the improper distribution of Equipment, provision of services, or billing to the TRS Fund.
( b ) NDBEDP certified programs shall include these whistleblower protections with the information they provide about the program in any employee handbooks or manuals, on their Web sites, and in other appropriate publications.