alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 11-1183.

#### Sattari *v.*Washington Mutual.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Referenced	Material

Inspire_1_User_Manual_v1.4_en.pdf

Phantom_3_Professional_User_Manual_v1.2_en.pdf

Inspire_1_Safety_Guidelines_en.pdf

Intelligent_Flight_Battery_Safety_Guidelines_en.pdf

Inspire_1_Disclaimer_and_Warning_en.pdf

Inspire_1_Release_Notes_en_0813.pdf

These	items	are	too	large	to	upload	to	your	portal	and	I	do	not	have	permission	

from	the	copywrite	holder	to	duplicate	them,	so	I	have	included	a	link	here:

http://www.dji.com/product/inspire-1/download

http://www.dji.com/product/phantom-3/download
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 14-1614

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Jose Valencia-Mata

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________

 Submitted: August 7, 2014

Filed: August 14, 2014

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Jose Valencia-Mata directly appeals the below-Guidelines-range sentence the

district court1

 imposed after he pled guilty to a drug-conspiracy offense, pursuant to

1

The Honorable Dean Whipple, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.
a plea agreement containing an appeal waiver. His counsel has moved to withdraw,

and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that

Valencia-Mata’s sentence is substantively unreasonable. Valencia-Mata has filed a

pro se brief, suggesting that his guilty plea was involuntary, that he received

ineffective assistance of counsel, and that he was entitled to safety-valve relief.

First, we conclude that Valencia-Mata’s challenge to the voluntariness of his

guilty plea is not cognizable because he did not move to withdraw his plea below. See

United States v. Umanzor, 617 F.3d 1053, 1060 (8th Cir. 2010) (defendant may not

challenge voluntariness of guilty plea for first time on direct appeal if he did not move

to withdraw plea in district court). Next, we decline to consider his ineffectiveassistance claims on direct appeal. See United States v. McAdory, 501 F.3d 868,

872-73 (8th Cir. 2007) (ineffective-assistance claims are ordinarily deferred to 28

U.S.C. § 2255 proceedings). Further, after careful de novo review, we enforce the

appeal waiver as to the remaining challenges to Valencia-Mata’s sentence. See United

States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (court should enforce

appeal waiver and dismiss appeal where it falls within scope of waiver, plea

agreement and waiver were entered into knowingly and voluntarily, and no

miscarriage of justice would result); see also United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704

(8th Cir. 2010) (de novo review of validity and applicability of appeal waiver). 

Finally, having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75

(1988), we find no non-frivolous issues outside the scope of the appeal waiver. 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. 

As for counsel’s motion to withdraw, we conclude that allowing counsel to

withdraw at this time would not be consistent with the Eighth Circuit’s 1994

Amendment to Part V of the Plan to Implement the Criminal Justice Act of 1964. We

therefore deny counsel’s motion to withdraw as premature, without prejudice to

counsel refiling the motion upon fulfilling the duties set forth in the Amendment. 

______________________________

-2-
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Openwave Systems Inc. on Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Kenneth D. Denman as Chief Executive Officer of Openwave Systems Inc., certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of his knowledge, (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Openwave Systems Inc.



|                 |  |     |  |                                          
|---------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------
|                 |  | By: |  | /s/    Kenneth D. Denman                 
|November 6, 2009 |  |     |  | Kenneth D. Denman Chief Executive Officer

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Openwave Systems Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Karen J. Willem, as Chief Financial Officer of Openwave Systems Inc., certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of her knowledge, (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Openwave Systems Inc.



|                 |  |     |  |                                                                  
|---------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|                 |  | By: |  | /s/    Karen J. Willem                                           
|November 6, 2009 |  |     |  | Karen J. Willem Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                          ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

               ---------------------------------------------------

                         CHASE CREDIT CARD MASTER TRUST
             (formerly known as Chemical Master Credit Card Trust I)

              ----------------------------------------------------

         The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of JPMorgan Chase
Bank (formerly known as The Chase Manhattan Bank), a banking corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the State of New York ("JPMCB"), as
Servicer pursuant to the Third Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing
Agreement dated as of November 15, 1999 (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement")
by and among JPMCB, Chase Manhattan Bank, USA, National Association and The Bank
of New York, as trustee (the "Trustee") does hereby certify that:

         1.       JPMCB is the Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing
                  Agreement.

         2.       The undersigned is duly authorized pursuant to the Pooling and
                  Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to
                  the Trustee.

         3.       This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 3.5 of the
                  Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

         4.       A review of the activities of the Servicer during the calendar
                  year ended December 31, 2003 was conducted under the
                  supervision of the undersigned.

         5.       Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of the
                  knowledge of the undersigned, fully performed all its
                  obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
                  throughout such period and no default in the performance of
                  such obligations has occurred or is continuing except as set
                  forth in paragraph 6 below.

         6.       The following is a description of each default in the
                  performance of the Servicer's obligations under the provisions
                  of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, including any
                  Supplement, known to the undersigned to have been made during
                  such period which sets forth in detail (i) the nature of each
                  such default, (ii) the action taken by the Servicer, if any,
                  to remedy each such default and (iii) the current status of
                  each such default: NONE


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate
this 30th day of March, 2004.

                                            JPMORGAN CHASE BANK,
                                            as Servicer,


                                            By:  /s/ Miriam K. Haimes
                                                 ------------------------------

                                            Name:  Miriam K. Haimes
                                            Title: Senior Vice President
Exhibit 10.3



LOGO

VIA EMAIL AND FACSIMILE

Fax: (310) 578-9316



October 4, 2000



Brent N. Cohen

President & CEO

US Search Corp.com

5401 Beethoven Street

Los Angeles, CA 90066



Dear
Brent:



Per your email and our conversation,
Yahoo! Inc. and US Search have agreed to amend the Advertising and Promotion Agreement (the Agreement) entered into as of May 28, 1999, in order to allow US Search additional time to pay Yahoo! the fees under the Agreement that were due
to Yahoo! on September 25, 2000, and which will be due on December 24, 2000. Accordingly, the parties agree to amend the payment schedule in Section 8.1 of the Agreement as follows:



| |  | Payment     |  | Date                                           
| |  | ----------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
| |  | $450,000.00 |  | September 25, 2000 (received on Friday 9/29/00)
| |  | $450,000.00 |  | October 25, 2000                               
| |  | $438,461.50 |  | November 24, 2000                              
| |  | $223,077.22 |  | December 24, 2000                              



US
Search agrees to adhere to Yahoos wiring instructions are as follows:



IMPERIAL BANK

2015 Manhattan Beach Blvd

Redondo Beach, CA 90278

Attn: Central California Regional Office

Routing #: 122201444

Beneficiary Account Name: Yahoo! Inc.

Beneficiary Account Number: 0017-063-286



|www.yahoo.com |  | [address illegible]
|------------- |  | -------------------



---



Yahoo reserves
all of its rights under the Agreement of May 28, 1999 including, specifically, but without limitation, the rights to immediately cause running US Searchs advertising units and seek payment as forth in the Agreement should US Search fail to
make any payment in the amount or under the timetable set forth above. US Searchs signature signifies its agreement to pay Yahoo as set forth above and its acknowledgement that Yahoo has not relinquished any of its rights under the Agreement.



Except as amended above, the Agreement remains
in full force and effect. Please sign as provided below to confirm our agreement and return your signature to me via facsimile with the original to follow by overnight service. If you believe the foregoing does not accurately represent our agreement
or if you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact Ben Padnos at 310-727-6829.



Sincerely, YAHOO! INC./s/ Tim ReillyTim Reilly Western Regional Vice President,
Sales




|cc: |  | Ben Padnos, New Business Manager, Yahoo!         
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|    |  | Peter Finnery, Account Management Manager, Yahoo!
|    |  | Teika Taylor, Corporate Credit Manager, Yahoo!   



THIS
LETTER ACCURATELY DOCUMENTS

THE AGREEMENT PREVIOUSLY REACHED

BETWEEN YAHOO! INC AND

US SEARCH.COM INC



|      
|------
|By:   
|      
|Title:
|      
|Date:
269P15

#### State v. Danny Lamont Avery

Def’s *Pro Se*Motion for PDR under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COAP15-460)

Dismissed
#### § 52.111 Toll free number assignment.

Toll free telephone numbers must be made available to Responsible Organizations and subscribers on an equitable basis. The Commission will assign toll free numbers by competitive bidding, on a first-come, first-served basis, by an alternative assignment methodology, or by a combination of the foregoing options.

[83 FR 53396, Oct. 23, 2018]
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17E0063. STEVEN JACOB SEIBERT v. STATE OF GEORGIA, ET AL. 

Steven Jacob Seibert’sMotion-Requestfor Time Extension to File Application

for Discretionary Appeal is DENIED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

June 30, 2017

06/30/2017
EXHIBIT 32

             CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                   AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of DataLogic
International, Inc (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30,
2005 (the "Report"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity
as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.

Date: August 11, 2005                    By: /s/ Keith Moore
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Keith Moore
                                         Chief Executive Officer,
                                         Chief Operating Officer and
                                         Director
                                         (Principal Executive Officer)

Date: August 11, 2005                      By: /s/ Khanh Nguyen
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Khanh Nguyen
                                         President, Chief Financial Officer
                                         and Director
                                         (Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Ap-pellee, v. LESLIE APARTMENTS, Inc., Leslie Garage, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 182, Docket 21921.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Feb. 14, 1951.

Decided March 6, 1951.

Ed Dupree, General Counsel, Leon J. Libeu, Assistant General Counsel, and Nathan Siegel, Special Litigation Attorney, Office of the Housing Expediter, Office of the General Counsel, all of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff-appellee.

Pyne, Lynch & Smith, New York City, Thomas A. Sully, New York City, of counsel, for defendants-appellants.

Before CHASE, CLARK and FRANK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment, 96 F.Supp. 355, affirmed. Woods v. Forest Hills South, 2 Cir., 172 F.2d 147.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


        In  connection  with  the   accompanying   Annual  Report  of  Concierge
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June
30,  2007 (the  "Report"),  I, Allen E.  Kahn,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the
Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78o(d)); and

        (2) The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:  October 10, 2007
                                                     /s/ Allen E. Kahn
                                                     -----------------
                                                     Allen E. Kahn
                                                     Chief Financial Officer


        The above  certification  is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  ss.1350)  and is not being filed as
part of the Form 10-KSB or as a separate disclosure document.






                                                                    Exhibit 32.1
                                                                Page 1 of 1 Page
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of CytoGenix, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Pam Schertz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Annual Report of CytoGenix, Inc. on form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in such Annual Report of CytoGenix, Inc. on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Pam Schertz

PAM SCHERTZ

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

March 29, 2007
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of E-LOAN, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Matthew Roberts, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Matthew Roberts Matthew Roberts
Chief Financial Officer

November 14, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to E-LOAN, Inc. and will be retained by E-LOAN, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"19-2313: ALPHONSO INC. v. FREE STREAM MEDIA CORP. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"2fo3ES4tMf\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/9-11-2020-19-2313-alphonso-inc-v-free-stream-media-corp-rule-36-judgment-19-2313-rule_36_judgment-9-11-2020_1651007\/\">19-2313: ALPHONSO INC. v. FREE STREAM MEDIA CORP. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/9-11-2020-19-2313-alphonso-inc-v-free-stream-media-corp-rule-36-judgment-19-2313-rule_36_judgment-9-11-2020_1651007\/embed\/#?secret=2fo3ES4tMf\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“19-2313: ALPHONSO INC. v. FREE STREAM MEDIA CORP. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"2fo3ES4tMf\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Opinions\/Orders posted: ALPHONSO INC. v. FREE STREAM MEDIA CORP. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT](pdf) Appeal Number: 19-2313 Origin: DCT Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
#### § 73.1202 [Reserved]