APPENDIX B.2

PM10 ALLOWABLE EMISSION CALCULATIONS FOR YEAR

2005 PLAN FOR STEUBENVILLE FACILITIES
(

Steubenville Emission Summary

Allowable. PM10 (Ib/hr)

24-Hour Annual

a. Briquetting 0.17 0.12

b. Emergency Water Pump 0.19 0.01

c. Roads 1.72 1.66

d. EAF Scrap Handling 4.42 1.46

TOTALS 6.50 3.25

Appendix B.2 I Page 1 .of 4
a. BriqueUing

EMISSION RATE FOR 24-HOUR MODELING PERIOD

1 M 1 TSP TSP 'PM10

Material Throughput Moisture EF 2 Effecti~ Emissions Emissions

(tons/hr) Content (%) (Ib/ton) Drop Points (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr)

Inside building:

Mill Scale 7.67 7.5 0.0005 0.08 3 0.0003 0.0001

C Scrap 20.41 4.0 0.0012 0.08 3 0.0019 0.0009

BF Sludge (Filter Cake) 5.08 25.0 0.0001 0.08 3 0.0000 0.0000

Flue Dust 7.67 1.0 0.0082 0.08 3 0.0051 0.0024

Coke Breeze 5.08 7.5 0.0005 0.08 3 0.0002 0.0001

Portland Cement 8.10 2.0 0.0031 0.02 4 0.0005 0.0002

Outside building:

Briquet 54.00 2.0 0.0031 1.00 6 0.1688 0.0798

Total: , 0.1768 0;0836

Cement Silo Stack - 1,5

0.02 gr/acfm

525 acfm

0.09 Ib/hr PM10

Total PM10 - 0.174 Ib/hr PM10

EMISSION RATE FOR ANNUAL MODELING PERIOD

7 M 1 TSP TSP PM10

Material Throughput Moisture EF 2 Effecti~ Emissions Emissions

(tons/hr) Content (%) (lbIton) Drop Points (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr)

Inside building:

Mill Scale 5.11 7.5 0.0005 0.08 3 0.0002 0.0001

C Scrap 13.61 4.0 0.0012 0.08 3 0.0013 0.0006

BF Sludge (Filler Cake) 3.38 25.0 0.0001 0.08 3 0.0000 0.0000

Flue Dust 5.11 1.0 0.0082 0.08 3 0.0034 0.0016

Coke Breeze 3.38 7.5 0.0005 0.08 3 0.0001 0.0001

Portland Cement 5.40 2.0 0.0031 0.02 4 0.0003 0.0002

Outside building:

Briquet 36.00 2.0 0.0031 1.00 6 0.1125 0.0532

Total: 0.1179 0.0558

Cement Silo Stack - 1,5,7

0.02gr/acfm

525 acfm

0.06 Iblhr PM10 .--------- ---- ------------ - ----,----,---- 0" __'- -_._------_._--_._._--_._._._.. ~--_ .._---------_._-------,.._-------..._-_.....-._...._---_. __.. ---- - . ._- ---------_..

Total PM10 - 0.116 Ib/hr PM10

1. From H.G.Strohrreyer FAX of 01/27/00, Briquet production 230,000 tons per year 16 hours/day, 54 tons/hr, SUo pararreters.

2. s= = (k)(.0032) (U/5)"1.3/ (M'2)"1.4 AP-42 13.2.4

U = 6.19 rrph

kTSP= 0.74

k RIiI10= 0.35

3. Drop points inside building: Control Efficiency:

1. From truck to storage bin 0.98 The PF Environrrental BuUdlng w II be sealed

2. From storage bin by front loader 0.98

3. Front loader to weight batcher 0.98

4. From weight batcher to rrixer 0.98

Material is wet after rrixer 3.92 Total

Effective Drop A:lints = 4 total drops, total control efficiency fraction (4 - 3.92 = 0.08)

4. Carrent is rroved from silo to rrixer In corrpletely enclosed COnveyor - one drop point to rrixer at 98% efficiency.

5. Carrent is pneumatically conveyed from truck to sUo and controlled by bin vent filler.

6. Briquet is rroved by conveyor from building to RR car - one drop point. no control.

7. Throughput adjusted for tw 0 8-hourshifts/day.

Appendix B.2, Page 2 of4

(

(

(

(

{

{

(

(

(

l

{
,(

(

b. Emergency Water Pump

WPSG will install a diesel powered emergency water pump emitting

84.32 grams/hour or

0.1859 Ib/hour, 24 hour modeling rate

The pump will run no more than 500 hours/year,

0.0106 Ib/hour, annual modeling·rate

c. Roads and Parking Lots

1741090010 F101

Road Controlled

Section

24-Hour Annual

Pa\ted

A 1.0528 1.0528

8 0.2495 0.2495

C 0.0277 0.0277

D1 0.1006 0.1006

D2 0.1275 0.1275

H1 0.0283 0.0283

K 0.0000 0.0000

L 0.0011 0.0011

Unpa\ted

D 0.0244 0.0135

E 0.0249 0.0138

F 0.0031 0.0017

G 0.0054 0.0030

H2 0.0629 0.0348

J 0.0132 0.0073

TOTAL 1.7214 1.6614

Appendix B. 2, Page· 30f 4
d. Strauss Industries - Scrap Processing

Emissions from EAF scrap handling would be 1.925 MM tons steel *.1.11 conversion *

0.00927 IbsPM/ton scrap = 9.91 tons/year. BOF scrap handling is 0.868 tons/year

from A scrap and 2.732 tons/year from remaining scrap, per the EAF PTI.

Total emissions are (9.91+0.868+2.732) * 0.473 PM10 fraction = 6.39 tons/yr.

Strauss Industries operates 8 hours per day.

24 hour emissions = 6.39 * 2000 / (0.33*8760) = 4.4209 Ib/hr

(

(

(

c

Annual emissions =6.39 * 2000 / 8760 = 1.4589 Iblhr

(

(

(

(

l

Appendix B.2, Page 4 ·of 4

(
(

c(

APPENDIX B.3

PM10 ALLOWABLE EMISSION CALCULATIONS FOR YEAR

2005 PLAN FOR FOLLANSBEE FACILITIES
(

(

(

Follansbee Emissions Summary

Allowable PM10 (Ib/hr)

24·Hour Annual

a. Charging

Bat. 1,2&3 0.59 0.14

Battery 8 0.33 0.08

b. Door Leaks

Bat,1,2&3 4.29 0.30

Battery 8 4.42 0.44

c. Topside Leaks

Bat. 1,2&3 1.17 0.28

Battery 8 0.99 0.24

d. Stacks

Bat.1,2&3 4.21 4.21

Battery 8 7.31 7.31

e.1. Pushing - Controlled

Bat. 1,2&3 2.30 2.30

Battery 8 0.51 0.51

e.2. Pushing Fugiti\es

Bat. 1,2&3 1.69 1.69

Battery 8 5.32 5.32

f. Quenching

Bat. 1,2&3 3.60 3.60

Battery 8 5.65 5.65

g. Boilers 4.97 4.97

h. Coal Crushing 0.51 0.34

i. Coal Handling 0.11 0.11

j. Storage Piles 0.45 0.45

k. Coke Size & Screen 1.51 1.51

I. Portable Coke Screen 1.51 0.34 1

m. Murphy Coke Breeze 1.24 0.22 2

n. Coke O\en Gas Flare 0.10 0.06

o. Roads 4.65 3.22

p. Arrow Terminal 4.18 2.20

q. Diesel Generator 0.06 0.00

r. Diesel Air Compressor 0.04 0.00 3

TOTALS 61.71 45.51

1. Portable Coke Screen is operated by Oxbow under separate WV DEP.permit.

2. Murphy operates coke screening plant under separate litleV permit.

3. Diesel Air Compressor -permitrequested

AppendixB.3 ,Page 1 of 19
Operating Parameters:

Batteries:

Throughput Tons of coal Uncontrolled No. of No. of

tons coaVhr per charge Ovens Doors Lids Offtakes

. Battery 1 31.6 12.3 47 47 188 47

Battery 2 31.6 12.3 47 47 188 47

Battery 3 34.0 12.3 51 51 204 51

Battery 8 152.6 34.0 79 158 316 158

Battery Stacks:

I'v1axirnum I'v1axirnum Coke to sizing &screening :

FIring Rate Row Rate 330 ton/hr

CFH DSCFM·

Battery 1 160,000 22,373 Excess COG Vent:

Battery 2 160,000 22,373 o dscfm

Battery 3 180,000 25,170 Shutdow n in 1995

Battery 8 868,700 121,480

The stack flow for Battery 1 was found to be 22,373 DSCFM during a stack test run 3/25/82 with a COG

firing rate of 158,000 CFH, fairly close to the rated capacity of 160,00OCFH. Flow rates for the rermining

stacks were found using a ratio of rated firing rates x the rreasured stack flow for Battery 1.

Storage Piles :

Sinter PlanfData: Area Silt Chntent

Stack Flow acres %

DSCFM Chal Storage 1 4.70 5.0

'Windbox 0 Chal Storage 2 4.70 5.0

Discharge 0 Chke Storage 2 1.27 5.0

Shutdow n in 1999 Flue Dust 0.45 18.0

p= 150 days

F= 5.0 %

Boilers: Material Handling:

Heaflnput Throughput M:listure

MMBtu/hr tons/hr Chntent %

Boiler 6 90.0 Coal to Crusher 500 7.5

Boiler 7 90.0 Chal to Bal. Bin 365 7.5

Boiler 8 85.0 Chal to Stockpile 365 7.5

Boiler 9 98.0 Chal Track I-bpper 365 7.5

Boiler 10 98.0 Portable Chke Screen 100 6.5

fv1ean Wind Speed = 6.19 rrph

..

AppendixB.3,Page 2 of 19

(

(

(

(

(

( (

(

(
(

a.Charging

Battery NO.1 = JEFFINAL Model Source 3401

Battery No.2 = JEFFINAL Model Source 3402

Battery No.3 = JEFFINAL Model Source 3403

Battery No.8 = JEFFINAL Model Source,3404

EMISSION RATE FOR 24-HOUR MODELING PERIOD

Battery Throughput Tons of coal TSP Emissions 1 PM10 2

Number tonlhr per charge Ib/hr Ib/hr

1 31.6 12.3 0.2551 0.1903

2 31.6 12.3 0.2551 0.1903

- 3 34.0 .. 12.3 0.2744 0.2047

8 152.6 34.0 0.4456 0.3324

TOTALS 1.2302 0.9177

EMISSION RATE FOR ANNUAL MODELING PERIOD

Battery Throughput Tons of coal TSP Emissions 3 PM10 2

Number tonlhr per charge Ib/hr Ib/hr

1 31.6 12.3 0.0589 0.0440

2 31.6 12.3 0.0589 0.0440

3 34.0 12.3 0.0634 0.0473

8 152.6 34.0 0.1030 0.0768

TOTALS 0.2843 0.2121

1. 8Tlssion Factor of Ib TSP/charge is derived fromEPA 450/3-85-028a Coke Oven Enissions Background Inforrration for

A"oposed Standards, Table 7-1

ForAllow ables, using 25 s/charge : Allowables (Kg)

Mnirrurn BSG/charge = (Average s/charge) * 0.006 = 0.00015

Maxirrurn BSG/charge = (Average s/charge/300)A2 * 7,500 = 0.05208

Average BSG/charge = ( Mnirrum + Maxirrum )/2 = 0.02612

Particulate sarrples= 58 % tar per George Czerniak of U.S. EPA Region V,Jan 14, 1993, rerrark#2.

2. FM10 fraction : 0.746 per George Czerniak of U.S. EPA Region V, Jan 14,1993, rerrark#2.

3. Enission Factor of Ib TSPlcharge is derived from EPA 450/3-85-028a Coke OvenBTissions Background Inforrration for

A"oposed Standards, Table 7-1

For Allow ables, using 12 s/charge: Allow abies (Kg)

Mnirrurn BSG/charge = (Average s/charge) * 0.006 = 0.00007

MaxirrurnBSG/charge = (Average s/chargel300)A2 *7,500 = 0.01200

Average BSG/charge = ( Mnirrum + Maxirrum )/2 = 0.00604

Particulate sarrples= 58 % tar per George Czerniak of U.S. EPA Region V, Jan 14, 1993, rerrark#2.

12 secondS per charge is LAER, Extended Track

Appendix B.3,Page30f 19
b. Door leaks

Battery No.1 =JEFFINAL Model Source 3405

Battery NO.2 =JEFFINAL Model Source 3406

Battery No.3 =JEFFINAL Model Source 3407

Battery No.8 = JEFFINAL Model Source 3408

EMISSION RATE FOR 24-HOURMODELING PERIOD

No. of % 1 2 2 2 TSP 3 PM 10 4

Battery Uncontroll Leaking Minimum kg Maximum kg A\erage kg Emissions Emissions

Number Doors Doors BSO/hr/leak BSO/hr/leak BSO/hr/leak Ib/hr Ib/hr

1 1----4:-=7~+-""':'1~0.-=-6-+--:0:-.0:::-1:-:1~2-t--0:::-.~12~54~-t---=0-::.0-=-68'::":3:--i---'7"1.-=-29::-::3:'::3--;----=1-::.2~5-=-5--I

2 47 10.6 0.0112 0.1254 0.0683 1.2933 1.255

3 51 11.8 0.0132 0.1473 0.0802 1.8349 1.780

8 158 10.8 0.0115 0.1290 0.0702 4.5557 4.419

TOTALS 8.9772 8.708

EMISSION RATE FOR ANNUAL MODELING PERIOD

No. of % 5 2 2 2 1 TSP 3 PM 10 4

Battery UncontroJlec Leaking Minimum kg Maximum kg A\eragekg Emissions Emissions

Number Doors Doors BSO/hr/leak BSO/hr/leak BSO/hr/leak Ib/hr Iblhr

1 1----4:'::7~+-~3."='8-+-~0:-;0'::":0~2""':'4--;--0:::-.~02~6~9-i----:=O--::.0:-:1"":":47=--+--=0.-=0~99~5:--1------=0--::.0~9~7--l

2 47 3.8 0.0024 0.0269 0.0147 0.0995 0.097

3 51 3.8 0.0024 0.0269 0.0147 0.1080 0.105

8 158 4.3 0.0029 0.0324 0.0176 0.4557 0.442

TOTALS 0.7627 0.740

1. \WViStandaro percent leaking doors =«No. of Doors *0.10)+2) 1No. of Doors. A shed covers one side of Batteries 1,2 and 3.

,The leaking doors are calculated for Battery No. 1 as (47 * .10) + 1 (One door and nottw 0 is added because of the shed) = 5.7

doors which is rounded down to five doors for the short term standard. The percent leaking doors would then be 5/47= 10.6%.

This Sarra logic applies for Batteries 2 and 3. The nurrber of leaking doors for Battery 8 would be (158 * .10) + 2 = 17.8 doors

which is rounded down to 17 doors for the short terlTlstandard. The percent leaking doors for Battery 8 would then be

17/158 =10.8 %.

2. Enission Factor of Ib TSP/hr/doorleak is derived from e'A 450/3-85-028a Coke Oven Enissions Background Inforrration for

A"oposed Standards, Table 7-2

USing Allowable R.D for Average R.D :

Mnirrum BSO/hrlleak=(Average A...DI70)A1.5 * 0.19 (kg)

Maxirrum BSO/hrlleak=11.2 * Minirrum (kg)

3. Particulate sarn:>les = 58 % tar. per George Czerniak, Jan 14, 1993, rerrark #2.

TSP =(Kg BSO/hr/leak) * (TSP/0.57 BSO) * (2.2046IblKg) * No. ofDoors * A..D

4. PM10 fraction = 0.97 per George Czerniak, Jan 14, 1993, rerrark #2.

5. LAER,Extended Track

Appendix B.3,Page 40£19

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

(
( c. Topside Leaks

Battery NO.1 =JEFFINAL Model Source 3409

Battery No.2 =JEFFINAL Model Source 3410

Battery No.3 =JEFFINAL Model Source 3411

Battery NO.8 =JEFFINAL Model Source 3412

EMISSION RATE FOR 24-HOUR MODELING PERIOD

Battery No. of No. of TSP Emissions 1 PM10 2 PM10 Emissions

Number Lids Ofltakes Ib/hr Fraction Ib/hr

1 188 47 0.3899 0.97 0.3782

2 188 47 0.3899 0.97 0.3782

3 204 51 0.4231 0.97 0.4104

8 316 158 1.0194 0.97 0.9888

TOTALS 2.2223 2.1556

EMISSION RATE FOR ANNUAL MODELING PERIOD

Battery No. of No. of TSP Emissions 1 PM 10 2 PM 10 Emissions

Number Lids Ofltakes Ib/hr Fraction Ib/hr

1 188 47 0.0949 0:97 0.0920

2 188 47 0.0949 0.97 0.0920

3 204 51 0.1029 0.97 0.0999

8 316 158 0.2505 0.97 0.2430

TOTALS 0.5432 0.5269

1. [(No. of lids * ;02) + (No. of offtakes * .10)] *(Ib TSPlhr)

lbTSPlhr is derived from SlA 450/3-85-028a Coke Oven Brissons Background Inforrration for A"oposed Standards, Table 7-3.

.Average BSe emssion rate =0.01215 kg/hrlleak or 0.0268 Ib/hrlleak.

'Particulate samples are 58% tar.

TSP Ib/hr =0,0268/.58 = 0.046 Ib/hr

2. AP-42 Table B.2-2, Category 9.

3. LAER, Extended Track is 0.47% leaking lids and 2.5% leaking offtakes.

AppendixB.3, Page 5 of 19
d. Battery Stacks

Battery No.1 = JEFFINAL Model Source 3413

Battery No.2 = JEFFINAL Model Source 3414

Battery NO.3 = JEFFINAL Model Source 3415

Battery NO.8 =JEFFINAL Model Source 3416

Actuals

Maximum Maximum TSP 1 PM 10 2 PM 10

Battery Firing Rate Flow Rate Emissions Fraction Emissions

Number CFH DSCFM Ib/hr Ib/hr

1 160,000 22,373 1.124 0.959 1.078

2 160,000 22,373 1.124 0.959 1.078

3 180,000 25,170 1.264 0.959 1.212

8 868,700 121,480 6.102 0.959 5.852

TOTALS 9.614 9.219

Allowables 3

Battery ITSP Emissions PM 10 Emissions

Number Ib/hr Ib/hr

1 1.405 1.347

2 1.405 1.347

3 1.580 1.516

8 7.627 7.314

TOTALS 12.017 11.524

1. (0.00586 gr/DSCF) *(Max. DSCFM) *(60 rrinlhr) *(lb17000 gr) 03116/82 Stack Test

2. AP-42 Table 12.2~4

3. Allow abies =1.25 x Actuals

AppendixB. 3, Page 6 of 19

(

(

(

(

(

(

( (

(

(
(

(

e.1. Pushing· Controlled

Battery Nos. 1,2& 3 =JEFFINAL Model Source 3417

Battery NO.8 = JEFFINAL Model Source 3418

Battery Tons of coke TSP Emissions Throughput TSP Emissions 3 PM 10 PM 10 Emissions

Number per push Ib/push tons coke/hr Ib/hr Fraction Ib/hr

1,2&3 8.0 0.271 1 68.0 2.304 1 4 2.304

8 22.0 0.121 2,6 106.8 0.587 0.87 5 0.511

Total 2.891 2.815

1. 0.271Ib/push based on 07/19/82 Stack Test, pushing and cokeside doors

2. 0.121 Ib/push based on 08130/82 Stack Test

3. «Throughput tonslhr) / (Tons/push» * (TSP Ib/push)

4. Assurre 100% of TSPis PM10.

5. AP-42 Table 12.2-3

6. New fans and larger motors becarre operational on Battery Nurrber 8 pushing emissions control system

on June 20,2005 whichwDl result in better capture ofpushing emissions

e.2. .Pushing·Fugitives

Battery Nos. 1,2 &3= JEFFINALModel Source xxxx

Battery No.8 =JEFFINAL Model Source xxxx

Battery Throughput TSP Emissions 1 Hood TSP Emissions 2 PM10 3 PM10 Emissions 4.5

Number tons coke/hr Ib/ton of coke Loss (%) Ib/hr Fraction Ib/hr

1 22.1 1.15 5% 1.271 0.433 0.550

2 22.1 1.15 5% 1.271 0.433 0.550

3 23.8 1.15 5% 1.369 0.433 0.593

8 106.8 1.15 10% 12.282 0.433 5.318 6

TOTALS 16.192 7,011

1. AP-42 Table 12.2-2 Uncontrolled Coke Pushing

2. (Throughput tons/hr) * (TSPlb/ton) * (Hood Loss)

3. AP-42 Table 12.2-3 Uncontrolled Coke Pushing

4. Aliowables=Actuals

5. Engineering jUdgerrent includes·coke side doors under shed.

6. New fans and larger motors becarre operational on Battery Nurrber 8 pushing emissions control system

on June 20,2005 which wDi result in better capture of pushing emissions

Appendix B.3, Page 70f 19
f. Quenching

Battery Nos. 1,2 &3 = JEFFINAL Model Source 3419

Battery No.8 =JEFFINAL Model Source 3420

Quench TSP Emission 1 Throughput TSP Emissions PM10 Emission 2 PM10 Emissions 2

Tower Factor Ib/ton tons/hr Ib/hr Fraction Ib/hr

Batteries 1,2 & 3 0.54 68.0 36.720 0.098 3.599

Battery 8 0.54 106.8 57.672 ·0.098 5.652

TOTALS 94.392 9.250

1. AP-42 Table 12.2-2

2. AP-42 Table 12.2-3

3. Allowables =Actuals

g.Boilers

JEFFINAL Model Source 3423

Boiler Heat Input Fuel Emission Factor 1 TSP PM10 2 PM10

Number MM Btu/hr Type (lb/MMBtu) (Ib/hr) Fraction (Ib/hr)

6 90.0 COG 0.012 1.08 0.959 1.04

7 90.0 COG 0.012 1.08 0.959 1.04

8 85.0 NG 0.0076 0.65 1.000 0.65

9 98.0 COG 0.012 1.18 0.959 1.13

10 98.0 COG 0.012 1.18 0.959 1.13

Totals 5.16 4.97

1. Enission factors from AP-42 Table 12.5-1

2. PM10 fractions from AP-42 Table 12.2-4

AppendixB.3, Page 8 of· 19

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

(
( h. Coal Crushing

JEFFINAL Model Source 3424

EMISSION RATE FOR 24-HQUR MODELING PERIOD

EF =

Throughput =

Uncontrolled TSP :

Building Enclosure

Control efficiency =

ACTUALTSP=

0.02 Ib/ton of coal NEDS Sec.

3-05-010-10

500 tons/hr coal WPSC Permit

Application

10.001b/hr

90% 1

1.00 Ib/hr

PM 10 Fraction =

ACTUAL PM 10 =

0.51

0.51 Ib/hr

AP-42 Table B.2-10

Category 3

( EMISSION RATE FOR ANNUAL MODELING PERIOD2

TSP =

PM 10 =

0.671b/hr

0.34lb/hr

(

1..The hanmmTiIl that does coal crushing has a top enclosure and the entire mil

is enclosed within a building.

2. Operations. are Iimted to tw 0 turns per day. Annualized emssions would be

2/3 * 1.00 =0.67Ib/hr forTSPand 2/3 * 0.51 = O.34Ib/hr for PM10.

Appendix B.3, Page90f 19
i. Coal Handling

Balancing Bin Trans = JEFFINAL Model Source 3425

Trans to Stockpile =JEFFINAL Model Source 3426

Track Hopper = JEFFINAL Model Source 3427

(

(

(

Process

Balancing Bin Trans 4

Trans to Stockpile

Track Hopper 4

TOTALS

Throughput TSP Emission

tons/hr Factor Ib/ton

500,0 0.00005

365,0 0.00050

365.0 0.00005

1 TSP Emissions 2 PM10 Emissions 3,5

Ib/hr Ib/hr

0.025 0,0116

0.183 0.0863

0.018 0.0085

0.225 0.1064

1. AP-42 13.2.4-3

E = 1«0,0032) * {(l.V5)**1.3/ (M/2)**1.4}

Where k = 0,74 for TSP

k= 0,35 for PM 10

U = Mean Wind Speed 6.19

M= M>isture Content = 7.5

rrph

% for coal

(

2. (ThroughpuUons/hr)* (Errission Factor Ib/ton)

3. (Throughput tons/hr) * (Errission Factor .lbIton) * (0.35/0.74)

4. Balancing Bin transfers occur in sealed building w ith an assumed control eficiency of 90 %.

5, AlioWables =Actuals

j.Storage Piles

Coal Storage 1 = JEFFINAL Model Source 3428

Coal Storage 2= JEFFINAL Model Source 3429

Coke Storage 2 = JEFFINAL Model Source 3432

Flue Dust =JEFFINAL Model Source 3433

Silt TSP Emission TSP 2 3 PM10

Storage Area Content Factor 1 Emissions PM 10 Emissons

Pile acres % Ib/day/acre Ib/hr Fraction Ib/hr

Coal Storage 1 4.70 5.00 1.73 !i 0.338 0.51 0.173

Coal Storage 2 4.70 5.00 1.73 0.338 0.51 0.173

Coke Storage 2 1.27 5.00 1.73 0.091 0.51 0.047

Flue Dust 0.45 18.00 6.22 0.117 0.51 0.059

(

(

(

(

TOTALS

1, AP-42 11.2.3-3 rev. 9/88

E= 1,7 * (s/1.5) * ((365-P)/235) * (F/15)

Where P= 150

F =5,0

2. (Area acres) * (Errission Factor Ib/day/acre) * (day/24hr)

3, AP-42.Table B.2-2 Category 3

0.885 0.451

4. Sinter processes are discontinued with sinter plant shutdow n in 1999, but some rawrraterials are still stored

in the south yard;

AppendixB.3, Page 10 of 19 (
( k. Coke Sizing & Screening 1& 2

Coke Sizing & Screening 1 =JEFFINAL Model Source 3430

Coke Sizing & Screening 2 = JEFFINAL Model Source 3431

EF =

Throughput =

0.09 Ib/ton of coke NEDS Factor

165.0 tons/hr coke each WPSC Permit

Application

Uncontrolled TSP = ·14.85Ib/hr each

Building Enclosure

Control Efficiency = 90%

ACTUAL TSP 1 =

ACTUAL TSP 2 =

PM 10 Fraction =

ACTUAL PM10 1 =

ACTUAL PM10 2 =

TOTALS

1A91b/hr

1.49 Ib/hr

0.51

0.761b/hr

0.761b/hr

1.51 Ib/hr

Source 3430

Source 3431

AP-42 Table B.2-2

Category 3

Source 3430

Source 3431

AppendixB.3,Page 11 of 19
I. Portable Coke Screen operated by Oxbow Carbon & Minerals, LLC

EMISSION RATE FOR 24..HOUR MODELING PERIOD

Process 1 Throughput TSP Emission TSP Emissions 4 PM10 Emissions 4

tons/hr Factor Ib/ton Ib/hr Ib/hr

Front end loader grizzly 100.0 0.00005 2 0.005 0.0023

Grizzly tocon\leyor 100.0 0.00005 2 0.005 0.0023

Con\leyor to screen 100.0 0.00005 2 0.005 0.0023

Screening 100.0 0.03150 3 3.150 1.5000

Screen to loading con\leyor or small pile 100.0 0.00005 2 0.005 0.0023

TOTALS 3.170 1.5093

EMISSION RATE FOR ANNUAL MODELING PERIOD

Process 1 Throughput 5 TSP Emission TSP Emissions 4 PM 10 Emission~ 4

tons/hr Factor Ib/ton Ib/hr Ib/hr

Front end. loader grizzly 22.8 0.00005 2 0.001 0.0005

Grizzly to con\leyor 22.8 0.00005 2 0.001 0.0005

Con\leyor to screen 22.8 0.00005 2 0.001 0.0005

Screening 22.8 0.03150 3 0.718 0.3420

Screen to loading con\leyor or small pile 22.8 0.00005 2 0.001 0.0005

TOTALS 0.723 0.3441

1. From WPSC FAX of Jan. 4, 2000. No controls on any process.

2.A~42 Table 13.2.4-3

E= k(0.0032) " {(U/5)**1.31 (M'2)**1.4}

Where k = 0.74 for TSP

k =0.35 for PM 10

U = Mean Wind Speed = 6.19 rrph

M = Ivbisture Content = 6.5 % for coke

3. A~42 Table 11.19.2-2

PM10= 0.015 Iblton processed

TSP= 0.0315 Iblton processed

4. (Throughput tons/hr) " (Errission Factor lbIton)

5. Hourly rate based on annual throughput of 200,000 tons.

Appendix B.3,Page .12 of 19

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

l
(

(

m. Murphy

Throughput = 125 tons per hour perplant,

100,000 tons per year per plant

g plants

Coke Handling:

AP-42 13.2.4, EF = (k)(0.0032) [(U/5)"1.3 I (M/2)"1.4]

Moisture content = 6.5 % from 10/26/97 Application

Average wind speed = 6.19 mph

k TSP = 0.74

k PM10 =0.35

EF (TSP) = (k)(0.0032) [(U/5)"1.31 (M/2)"1.4] = 0.0006 Ib/ton

EF (PM10) = 0.00028 Ib/ton

Drop points:

1 Truck to stockpile

1 To screening station by front loader

1 Screening station to conveyor 1

1 Conveyor 1 to conveyor 2

1 Conveyor 2 to conveyor 3

1 Conveyor 3 to stockpile

1 To truck or railcar by frontloader

7 Total

No controls

Hourly TSP from coke handling: .

Tons/hour per plant * no. plants * EF, Ib/ton * no. of drop points = 1.05 IbTSP/hour

Yearly TSP from coke handling:

Tons/year per plant * no. plants * EF, Ib/ten* no. of drop points * ton/2000 Ib = 0.42 tons TSP/year

Hourly PM10. from coke handling:

Tons/hour per plant * no. plants * EF, Ib/ton * no. of drop points = 0.50 Ib PM10/hour

Yearly PM10 from coke handling:

Tons/yearper plant * no. plants * EF, Ib/ton * no. of drop points * ton/2000 Ib = 0.20 tons PM1O/year

Coke Screening:

AIRS Emission Factor

EF (PM10) = 0.04 Ib/ton ofceke processed

EF (TSP) = 0.09 Ib/ton of coke processed

Full Enclosure,· 99 %. efficiency

Hourty TSP from coke screening:

Tons/hour per plant * no. plants * EF, Ib/ton * efficiency = 0.21 .Ib TSP/hour

Yearty TSP from coke screening:

Tons/year per plant * no. plants * EF, Ib/ten * ton/2000 Ib = 0.08 tons TSP/year

Hourty PM10from coke screening:

Tons/hour per plant * no. plants * EF, Ib/tan * efficiency = 0.10 Ib PM10/hour

Yearty PM10from coke screening:

Tons/year per plant* no. plants * EF, Ib/ton * ton/2000 Ib = 0.04 tons PM10/year

AppendixB.3, Page 13.of19
m. Murphy (Continued) (

Coke Storage Piles (Wind Erosion):

AP-42 11.2.3-3 rev.9/88, EF (TSP) = 1.7 * (s/1.5) * ((365-P)/365) * (F/15)

Silt content = 5 %

Days per year with precipitation: 150

F= 5

EF (TSP) = 1.7 * (s/1.5) * ((365-P)/365) * (F/15) = 3.34 Ib/daylacre

EF (PM10) = EF (TSP) 12 = 1.67 Ib/daylacre

Storage Piles = QJ. acres

(

(

Hourly TSP from coke storage:

Storage pile area (acres) * EF(lb/daylacre) * day/24hr = 0.01 Ib TSP/hour

Yearly TSP from coke storage:

Storage pile area (acres) * EF(lb/day/acre) * 365 days/year * ton/20001b = 0.06 tons TSP/year

Roads:

AP-42 13.2.2 Unpaved Roads

EF = k * 5.9 *(s/12) * (S/30) * rN/3)"fJ.7 * (w/4)"fJ.5 ((365-p)/365) =lbNMT

For TSP, k= 0.80

For PM10, k= 0.36

s = Surface silt content 6.0 %, mean for Iron & Steel

S =Mean vehicle speed § mph

W= Mean vehicle weight 50.5 ton, estimated

w = Mean number of wheels per vehicle 4

p =Days per year with precipitation 150

EF(TSP) = 1.67 Ib/vehicle mile traveled

EF'(PM10) = 0.75 Ib/vehicle mile traveled

Control Efficiency,. Control of Open Fugitive Dust Sources, p. 3.3-1

C =100-(0.8*p*d*t/i) = %>control

p =potential average hourly daytime evaporation rate 0.26 mm/h (summer months)

d = average hourly daytime traffic rate 1

t = time between applications 1 hours

I = application intensity 0.030 Umll2

C =100-(0.8*p*d*tli) = 72.3 % control

Truck Mileage = 6250 miles per year

An estimated 100 % of vehicle miles traveled occur on the plant

Hourly TSP from roads:

VMT per year * percentoftravel inside plant * EF(lbNMD * control efficiency * year/2080 hours =

1.391b TSP/hour

Yearly TSPfrom roads:

VMT per year* percent of travel inside plant * EFQbNMD * control efficiency * ton/2000 Ib = 1.45 tons TSP/year

Hourly PM10 from roads:

VMT per year * percent oftravel inside plant * EF(lbNMD * control efficiency * year/2080 hours =

0.63 Ib PM10/hour

Yearly PM10 from roads:

VMT per year * percent of travel inside plant * EF(lbNMD *.control efficiency *ton/2000 Ib = 0.65 tons PM10lyear

TOTALS

Hourly PM10 = 1.24 Ib/hour

Yearly PM10 = 0.95 tons/yr= 0.22 Ib/hr

Appendix B. 3 I Page 14. of 19

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

(
(

(

n. Coke Oven Gas Flare

Newsource- not in JEFFINAL·Model Im.entory

EMISSION RATE FOR 24-HOUR IvODalNG PERIOD

COG Throughput = 21.00 MMCF/day

Heat Content = 568.00 Btu/CF Maximum heat content in last sewral years --

Emission Factor = 0.012 Ib/MM Btu AP-42 Table 12.5-1

TSP = 5.96lb/hr

PM10 Fraction = 0.959

PM 10 = 5.72lb/hr

EMISSION RATE FOR ANNUAL IvODaING PERIOD

COG Throughput = Z:.! MMCF/Day annualized

Heat Content = 568.00 Btu/CF Maximum heat content in last se\eral years

Emission Factor = 0.0121b/MMBtu AP-42 Table 12.5-1

TSP = 2.021b/hr

PM10 Fraction = 0.959

PM 10 = 1.931b/hr

AppendixB.3 Page 15 of 19
(

o. Roads and Parking Lots (

Road Controlled

Section Emissions

(Ib/hr)

24-Hour 1 Annual 2

Paved

A 0.0570 0.0570

B 0.1606 0.1606 (

C 0.0062 0.0062

G 0.0679 0.0679

H 0.4862 0.4862

I 0.3377 0.3377

Q 0.0496 0.0496

S 0.0462 0.0462 (

U1 0.0424 0.0424

U2 0.1213 0.1213

P-1 0.0019 0.0019

Unpaved

D 0.1705 0.0963

E 0.0319 0.0180 (

F 0.0799 0.0452

I 0.0538 0.0304

J 0.0781 0.0442

K 0.1379 0.0779

L 0.2197 0.1242

M 0.0565 0.0320 (

N 0.0643 0.0364 (

0 0.0071 0.0040

Q 0.1786 0.1009

R 0.1235 0.0698

T 1.1858 0.6702

V 0.0545 0.0308

X 0.2847 0.1609 (

Y 0.2891 0.1634

Z 0.1306 0.0738

AA&AB 0.0786 0.0444

AC 0.0193 0.0109

P-2 0.0165 0;0093

P-3 0.0006 0.0003

P-4 0.0017 0.0010

1 0.0005 0.0003

2 0.0004 0.0002

3 0.0008 0.0005

4 0.0011 0.0006

5 0.0031 0.0018 (

TOTAL 4.6459 3.2246

1. 24-Hour errissions .from Appendix C

2. Annual errissions are calculated for paved and unpaved roads

separately. Paved road 24-hour enissions retained as annual.

Unpaved road annualenissions are Influenced by the nurrber

of rain days (148 per year); Unpaved annual enissions are (

calculated as Unpaved 24-hour· (1-(148/365» or 59% of

the Unpaved 24-hour values.

Appendix B.3, Page 16 of .19
( p.Arrow Terminal

Materials Handling Method

Cam from bilrge to bin, no control

Bin to truck, 3-slded doghouse

Truck dUrrp to pUe, nocontrol

Front loader to raUcar, nocontrol

EMISSION RATE FOR 24-HOUR MODELING PERIOD

M 3 1 TSP 2 TSP PM10

Moisture Throughput Control EF Emissions Emissions

content (%) (tons/hr) Efficiency (%) (Ib/ton) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr)

2.0 500.0 0 0.0031 1.5627 0.7391

2.0 500.0 75 0.0031 0.3907 0.1848

2.0 500.0 0 0.0031 1.5627 0.7391

2.0 500.0 0 0.0031 1.5627 0.7391

5.0789 2.4022

(

Vehicle emissions, unpaved roads

a= = k [(s/12)Aa * (W/3jAb] I [(M'0.2)AC] * [(S/15)] * [(365-p)/365]AF42, p. 13.2.2-3 (Rev. 9/98)

Where: k = 2.6 for FMl0 W = tons vehicle weight errpty

a = 0.8 for FMl0 tons vehicle weight filed

b = 0.4 for FMl0 M= % surface rmterlal rroisture content

c = 0.3 for FMl0 5 = 10 rrph average vehicle speed

s = § % sit content of road p = 0 days of 0.01" precipitation per year

a= = 2.5820 IbNMT

Vehicle mles traveled on unpaved road: Road length = 0.233 niles one way

500.0 tonslhour I 25 tonsnoad = 20.0 trips/hour

VMT = 4.66 per hour once full and once errpty

With chenical dust suppression application every 2 w eeks for an 94% control efficiency:

Vehicle Errissions : 2.5820 IbNMT * 4.66 VMTlhr * 2 passes * (1-0.94) = 1.44 Ib/hr

Vehicle emissions, paved roads

EF=O.n(sU.35)A.3 Where: sL= 0.554 g1m'2 si~loadingperpavedroadsweepingprogram

a= = 0.3081 IbNMT

Vehicle rriles traveled on paved road:

VMT=

Road length = 0.246 niles one w ay

500.0 tons/hour I 25 tonsnoad = 20.0 tripslhour

4.91 per hour once fun and once errpty

Vehicle Enissions : 0.3081 IbNMT * 4.91 VMTlhr* 2 passes * (1-0.89) = 0.33 Iblhr

Storage Wind erosion

Afl.42 11.2.3-3 rev. 9/88

E= 1.7 * (s/1.5) * «365-Pl/235) * (F/15) = 0.069. LbJ'M'day/acre

Where p= 150

F= 5.0 %

s = 0.2 %

Area of storage = 0.25 acres

FM Ibslhr. = (Area acres)*(Enission Factor LbJday/acre)*(dayI24) = 0.0007 Iblhr

FMl0lbslhr. = FMl0 factor based on ratio of batch drop particles size rnu~IpUers from Table 11.2.3-2. (0.35/0.74=0.47) = FM to FMl0 conversion factor.

FMl0lbslhr. = 0.00034

Total PM10Emissions = 4.181b/hr

Appendix B.3, Page 17 of 19
p. Arrow Terminal (Continued)

(

EMISSION RATE FOR ANNUAL MODELING PERIOD C

M TSP PM10

Materials Handling Method Moisture 3 Throughput 1 Control TSP EF 2 Emissions Emissions

content ('Yo) (tons/hr) Efficiency ('Yo) (Ib/ton) (Ib/hr) Qb/hr)

Cam from barge to bin, no control 2.0 210.0 0 0.0031 0.6565 0.3105

Bin to truck, 3-s!ded doghouse 2.0 210.0 75 0.0031 0.1641 0.On6

Truck durrp to pOe, no control 2.0 210.0 0 0.0031 0.6565 0.3105 (

Front loaderto reHcar, no control 2.0 210.0 0 0.0031 0.6565 0.3105

2.1336 1.0091

Vehicle emissions, unpaved roads

EF = k [(s/12)"a * (W/3)"b] I [(M'0.2)"c] * [(5115)) * [(365-p)/365] AP-42, p. 13.2.2-3 (Rev. 9/98)

Where: k= ~forFM10 W= tons vehicle weight errpty

a = M for PM1 0 tons vehicle weight filed

b = '0.4 for FM10 M = 0.2 % surface material rrolsture content

c = Q1 for PM10 S = 10rrph average vehicle speed

s = !! % sit content of road p = 148 days of0.01" precipitation per year

EF= 1.5351 IbNMT

Vehicle rriles traveled on unpaved road: Road length = 0.233 rriles one Way

500.0 tonslhour ,I 25 tonslload = 20.0 tripslhour

VMT = 4.66 per hour once full and once errpty

With chemical dust suppression application every 2 weeks for an 94% control efficiency:

Vehicle Errissions : 1.5351 IbNMT * 4.66 VMTlhr * 2 passes *(1-0.94)= 0.86 Ib/hr

(

(

Vehicle emissions, paved roads

EF=O.77(sU.35)".3 Where: sL = 0.554 glm"2 sill loading per paved road sweeping program

EF = 0.3081 IbNMT

Vehicle niles traveled on paved road:

VMT=

Road length = 0.246 rrilesone w ay

500.0 tons/hour I 25 tonsnoad = 20.0 tripslhour

4.Q1 per hour once fun and once errpty

( (

Vehicle Errissions : 0.3081 IbNMT * 4.91' VMTlhr * 2 passes * (1-0.89)= 0.33 Iblhr

Storage Wind Erosion

AP-42 11.2.3-3 rev. 9/88

E= 1.7 * (s/1.5) * ((365-Pj/235) * (F/15) = 0.069 Lb.RvVdaylacre

Where P= 150

F= 5.0 %

s = 0.2 %

Area of storage =. 0.25 acres

PM Ibs/hr. = (Area acres)*(Errission Factor Lb.ldaylacre)*(day/24) = 0.0007 Iblhr

FM1 0 Ibslhr = PM10 factor based on ratio of batch drop particles size ITUltipliers from Table 11.2.3-2. (0.35/0.74=0.47) = PM to PM10 conversion factor.

PM10 Ibslhr. = 0.00034

Annual PM10 tonslyear = Ib.lhr. * 8760 Iblyear I 2000lb.lton = 0.001 Iblhr

(

(

Total PM10 emissions = 2.201b/hr

1. Throughput 500.0 tonslhour

For annualized throughput: 1,840,000 tpyl876 210.0457 tonslhour

2. EF =(k)(.0032)(LV5)**1.3/(M'2)"1.4 AP-42 13.2.4

3. Moisture content fromWPSC Perrril Application

U=

kTSP=

kPM10=

6.19 rrph

0.74

0.35

(

(

Appendix B.3, Page 18 of 19 (
(

(

(

"

q. Diesel Generator

WPSC installed a diesel powered emergency generator emitting

25.5 grams/hour or

0.056 Ib/hour, 24 hour modeling rate

The generator will. run no more than 500 hours/year,

0.003 Ib/hour, annual modeling rate

r. Diesel Air Compressor

WPSC applied for a permit for this source.

PM emissions = 0.044 Ib/hr for 24-houf modleing period

PM emissions = 0.003 Ib/hr for annual modeling period

PM emissions based on manufacturer's data

Appendix E.3, Page 19 of 19
(

(

(

APPENDIX C

ROAD CONTROL PROGRAM FOR

WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL CORPORATION

MINGO JUNCTION FACILITY,

STEUBENVILLE FACILITY AND

FOLLANSBEE FACILITY
(

(

(

This document presents a .reviseddust suppression program required

. to meet the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the WheelingPittsburgh Steel Corporation (WPSC) facilities at Mingo Junction

and Steubenville, Ohio and Follansbee, West Virginia. The US EPA

supplied program, MECH@X@Y, was used to develop the control program

for the initial year for unpaved roads. As shown in Appendix C.2,

the following years should be controlled through a separate EPA

document ("Control of Open Fugitive Dust Sources," September 1988) .

Roads and parking lots are presented in Figure 1 for the Mingo

Junction Facility, in Figure 2 for the Steubenville Facility and in

Figures 3.1 and 3.2 for the Follansbee Facility~ Controls for the

paved and uhpaved roads are presented as follows:

PAVED ROADS

Traffic counts were conducted at WPSC in 1983. An origindestination analysis was used to update the traffic patterns at

Mingo Junction to reflect the maximum steel production of 10,000

tons per day. Similarly, the Steubenville traffic was updated to

reflect increased production. Traffic counts were updated in 1998

at the Follansbee facility because of revisions to traffic flow.

The paved roads were treated as industrial paved roads for purposes

of calculating PMlO emissions.

Paved road silt loading was developed from testing done in 1993 at

the Mingo Junction facility using a TYMCO Regenerative Air Sweeper.

Results from the last day of sweeping· were used to develop the

estimate. The first three of the eight test sites from Table C-3

of E2M-640-93 had been swept by the TYMCO on the previous day. The

silt loading prior to the TYMCO pass was 0.95 grams/m2 at these

three sites. The silt loading after the TYMCO pass was 0.22

grams/m2 • Silt loading is assumed to increase linearly between the

APPENDIX C, Page C-1
sweeping events. Since emissions are related to the 0.8 power of

silt loading for vehicles less than 4.4 tons and to the 0.3 power

of silt loading for vehicles over 4.4 tons, emissions do not follow

a straight average of the two silt loading values for a daily

average. Instead, emissions were calculated for each hour. Those

values are summarized in Table C-1. As shown in Table C-1, the

paved road emissions increased between sweeping events. Additional

testing was done in 1998 on a Schwartz sweeper. The Schwartz

sweeper met the performance value achieved by the" TYMCO Sweeper.

The TYMCO sweeper was replaced by the Schwartz equipment in 1998.

For the Mingo Junction facility, paved road PM10 hourly emissions

increase from 5.0552 pounds per hour after the sweeping event to

7.8447 pounds per hour prior to sweeping again. The mean for the

day would be 6.6693 pounds per hour. For the Steubenville

facility, paved road PM10 hourly emissions increase from 1.2626

pounds per hour to 1.8681 pounds per hour between sweeping. The

mean for the day would be 1.5875 pounds per hour. For the

Follansbee facility, paved road PM10 hourly emissions increase from

1.0429 pounds per hour to 1.6207 pounds per hour between sweeping.

The mean for the day would be 1.3769 pounds per hour. Table C-2

shows the worksheet for 0.22 grams/m2 , and Table C-3 shows the

worksheet for 0.95 grams/m2 •

UNPAVED ROADS

Physical parameters for the unpaved roads are listed in Table C-4.

Chemical dust suppressant is presented in Tables C-5, C-6 and C-7

for the initial application and in Tables C-8, C-9 and C-10 for the

maintenance applications. A summary of the MECH@X@Y output found

in" Appendix C.1 is presented in Table C-11. These chemical

additions are considered for the first year of control program.

Follow-up years should follow the guidance in the EPA document

APPENDIX C, Page C-2

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

(
(

(

(

"Control of Open Fugitive Dust Sources. tr That follow-on program is

identified in TableC-12. Emissions are shown in Table C-13.

Chemical applications reflect the experience gained in 1995 by WPSC

and the Syntech Company. Some roads require additional chemical

applications because of the type of vehicle traffic.

As noted in AppendixC.2, the control program developed by MECH@X@Y

is appropriate for the first year of the program. The second year

should acknowledge the ground inventory from the prior year. A

procedure is suggested in Appendix C. 2 to develop the on-going

control program. The follow-on program can be defined using

Figure 4, which in association with Appendix C. 2, yields the

control values listed in Table C-12. The control factors in

Table C-10 were applied to Mingo Junction, Steubenville and

Follansbee as shown in Table C-13.

The unpaved road control program was discussed with plant

personnel. A summary comparison of the chemical use indicated that

some roads had more chemicals used than listed in Tables C-5 and

C-8 for the Mingo Junction facility. The slab laydown area

requires more applications because the road surface undergoes more

wear than the computer program would indicate.

Chemical dust suppression is used on a year-round basis, weather

permitting.

TOTAL EMISSIONS

At maximum capacity of the Mingo Junction facility, total fugitive

dust emissions from the roads at the suggested control program are:

APPENDIX C, Page C-3
Paved Roads 6.67 lbs/hr (

Unpaved Roads 0.94 lbs/hr

Total 7.61 lbs/hr

At maximum capacity of the Steubenville facility, total fugitive

dust emissions from the roads at the suggested control program are:

(

(

Paved Roads 1. 59 lbs/hr

Unpaved Roads 0.13 lbs/hr

lbs/hr

(

Total 1.72

At maximum capacity of the Follansbee facility, total fugitive dust

emissions from the roads at the suggested control program are: (

Paved Roads

Unpaved Roads

Total

1. 38 lbs/hr

3.00 lbs/hr

4.38 lbs/hr ( (

(

(

APPENDIX C, Page C-4
(

Drawin

Scale:

Code:

/

/

!

.......

·······,·.r·······..·..._....... ..i ..... j

/ .

500

- - o

sclfJ'

Layout of the Roads at Mingo

Facility

Energy & Environmental Management, hie.

-Paved Road

_Paved Lot IIlU"'IIlIl11 Unpaved Road _ Unpaved Lot

(

APPENDIX C, Page C-5
(

(

(

(

(

(

<-

l

(

(

(

.;..

.....

/ ..........;

J

# . '1/ :

fI ; fI .

l

11

1000

FEET

\

.•..

........

.......

Layout of the Roads at the Steubenville

Facility

Energy & Environmental Management, Inc.

500

- -

....... ....

./

~t~.u.benyilre

o

sc::f'

-Paved Road

_Paved Lot

,,,.,,,,,"'...Unpaved Road _ Unpaved> Lot

APPENDIX C, Page C-6
(

(

at Follansbee

Energy & Environmental Management, Inc.

APPENDIX C, Page C-7
(

Energy ~. Environmental Management, Inc.

Layout of the. Roads at Follansbee

Sinter Plant Area

(

(

c

(

(

(

(

(

( (

/...-.- ..

,

,

2

FEET

_Paved Road

_Paved Lot

PUlIll1llUil!IUnpaved Road

~Unpaved Lot

500

SINTER PLANT

R

:\

\\

\\

\\\\\\\\

\\

\\

\\

\\

\\'\\\\~\\\\

\\\ \

\\

\\

\\\\

APPENDIX C, Page C-8
(

(

GROUND INVENTORY

(gaIjyd 2)

t-=;:-;_:__;_;_:_~_-;:~_f::fl:-'c_i-;e:-n_c_

Y

_f_o_r-;:-o-:n---:---;G_O_i_n_

g

__c_o_n-;t:-r_o-;I__--t!'IfQl!!illl.l1Q!!!lr.;......!!!£k'L-----J

Energy & Environxnental Managexnent., Inc.

APPENDIX C, Page C-9
TABLE C-l

HOURLY PM10 EMISSIONS FROM THE PAVED ROADS AFTER DAILY

SWEEPING PROGRAM IS UNDERWAY WITH TYMCO SWEEPER

Silt .PM10 Emissions (#/hr) Silt PM10 Emissions (#/hr)

Loading Mingo Steuben- Loading Mingo SteubenHour (g/m2 ) Junction ville Follansbee Hour (g/m2) Junction ville Follansbee

1 0.22 5.0552 1.2026 1.0429 13 0.. 60 6.8329 1.6265 1.4109

:J::l 2 0.25 5.2530 1.2497 1.0838 14 0.63 6.9338 1. 6506 'l:l 1.4318

'l:l

!:':I 3 0.28 5.4349 1.2931 1.1214 15 0.66 7.0314 1.6739 1.4520

z

0

H 4 0.32 5.6572 1. 3461 1. 1674 16 0.70 7.1568 1. 7038 1.4780

:><

0 5 0.35 5.8115 1.3829 1. 1993 . 17 0.73 7.2476 1.7255 1. 4968 ..

'l:l 6 0.38 5.9569 1.4175 1.2294 18 0.76 7.3359 1.7466 1.5151

Pi

LQ 7 0.41 6.0944 1.4503 1. 2579 19 0.79 7.4217 1. 7671 1. 5329

(1)

0 8 0.44 6.2250 1. 4815 1. 2849 20 0.82 7.5053 1. 7870 1. 5503

I

I-' 9 0.47 6.3496 1.5112 1.3107 21 0.85 7.5868 1. 8065 1. 5672

0

10 0.51 6.5073 1.5488 1.3434 22 0.89 7.6923 1.8317 1. 5891

11 0.54 6.6200 1. 5757 1.3667 23 0.92 7.7694 1.8501 1.6051

12 0.57 6.7284 1.6016 1.3892 24 0.95 7.8447 1. 8681 1. 6207

24 Hour Mean 6.6693 1. 5875 1. 3769

C"

~,

(' ,-'

/""

,-. -, ,-, '"""

/--"
(

,{

TABLE C-2

WORKSHEET FOR PAVED ROAD SILT LOADING OF 0.22 grams/m2

Dally Vehicle Passes I Road EmissIon Rate • Road Description B VehIcle Tv 18 Length Bv VehIcle Tv"" b1hrl

Section A B C D E (mO A B C D E Total

MinDO Junctlon'Facilltv

A Entrance Road 313 57 366 0.5114 1.29E-D3 2.84E-{)1 1.82E+OO 2.1071

B BOF - Serae Handline Road 151 51 254 0.6003 7.30E-{)4 2.98E-{)1 1.48E+OO 1,7830

0 80" Hot Stria Mm Road 30 14 130 0.3409 8.24E-{)5 4.65E-{)2 4.31E-{)1 0.4779

E Blast Furnace- Labor OffICe Road 112 0.2288 2.06E-{)4 0.0002

F Center Road Section 4 0.3767 1.21E-{)5 0.0000

G Truck Scale 229 57 366 0.1100 2.03E-{)4 6.10E-{)2 3.92E-{)1 0.4532

I Siao HaulRoad & Berms 48 0.5000 2.34E-{)1 0.2336

L BOF Parkino Lot 10 0.0265 2.14E-{)6 0.0000

U Short Road 5 0.0426 1.72E-{)6 0.0000

BB Office Road 85 0.1136 7.78E-{)5 0.0001

HH Fork Truck Road, oaved section 27 0.1326 2.88E-{)5 0.0000

KK Stria Mill Parkina Lot 27 0.0492 1.07E-{)5 0.0000

Total 5.0552

Steubenville Facilitv

A Entrance Road 270 86 74 0.5114 1.11E-D3 4.28E-{)1 3.68E-{)1 0.7976

B Cold Stria Mm Road 75 14 74 0,2206 1.33E-{)4 3.01E-{)2 1.59E-{)1 0.1891

C Cold Strin MiD Entrance Road 18 8 11 0.1136 1.85E-{)5 8.85E-D3 1.22E-{)2 0.0210

01 Plant Center Road North 177 64 19 0.0941 1.34E-{)4 5.86E-{)2 1.74E-{)2 0.0762

02 Plant Center Road South 177 21 19 0.2486 3.52E-{)4 5.05E-{)2 4.56E-{)2 0.0965

Hl PF Environmental Road 2 45 0.0489 7.89E-{)7 2.14E-{)2 0.0214

K Parkino LoL North of Guard 10 0.0112 9.02E-{)7 0.0000

L Parkina LoL South of Guard 4 0.0205 7.98E-{)4 0.0008

Total 1.2026

Follansbee Facility

A Entrance Road 315 29 15 0.1000 2.54E-{)4 2.82E-{)2 1.46E-{)2 0.0431

B Bvoroducts Plant Road 74 39 0.3200 1.91E-{)4 1.21E-{)1 0.1217

C Office Road 11 6 0,0800 7.09E-D6 4.67E-{)3 0.0047

G Plant Center Road 72 66 0.0800 4.64E-{)5 5.14E-{)2 0.0514

H Batterv 8 Road 160 90 0.4198 5.41E-{)4 3.68E-{)1 0.3683

I South Entrance 43 11 252 0.1000 3.46E-{)5 1.07E-{)2 2.45E-{)1 0.2560

Q South Entrance 38 28 56 0.0459 1.41E-{)5 l.25E-{)2 2.50E-{)2 0.0376

S Sinter Plant Storaoe Road 2 10 0.3600 5.80E-{)6 3.50E-{)2 0.0351

Ul South Entrance 5 15 51 0.0500 2.01E-{)6 7.3OE-D3 2.48E-{)2 0.0321

U2 South Entrance 10 12 306 0.0297 2.39E-D6 3.47E-D3 8.85E-{)2 0.0919

P-l Fenced Parkino Across Rte 7 222 0.5000 8.94E-{)4 0.0009

Total 1.0429

1. Vehicle types and weights are as follows:

Type Weight

(tons)

A 2

B 15

C 40

o 55ernpty

130 full

E 119empty

154 full

2. Emission Factors from Publication EPA-450/3-88-{)08 Control of Open Fugitive Dust Sources, Table 2-7, Decision Rule for

Paved Road Emission Estimates.

ForsL<2 g/rn·2 and W<4.4 tons :

EF=O.0081 (slJ.7)·.8 =

WheresL=

or

For sL<2 g/rn·2 and W>4.4 tons:

EF=O.77(sU.35}·.3 =

1.93E-{)4 IbNMT

ll.Z2 g/m·2

0.01 ozlydA2

2.34E-{)1 IbNMT

APPENDIX C, PageC-ll

Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel CorponitiOn
TABLE C-3

WORKSHEET FOR PAVED ROAD SILT LOADING OF 0.95 grams/m2

Dally Vehicle Passes I Road Emission Rate 2

Road Description B VehlcleT Length BvVehlcle Tvne ,lblhrI

Seclfon A B C 0 E lIOn A B C 0 E Total

Minoa Junction Facilitv

A Entrance Road 313 57 366 0.5114 4.16E-D3 4,40E-lll 2.83E+OO 3.2701

B BOF - Seraa HandiinaRoad 151 51 254 0.6003 2.35E-ll3 4.62E-lll 2.30E+OO 2.7666

0 SO· Hot Stria Mill Road 30 14 130 0.3409 2.66E-ll4 7.21E-02 B.69E-lll 0.7414

- E Blast Fumace - Labor OffIce Road 112 0.2288 6.65E-04 0.0007

F Center Road Section 4 0.3767 3.91E-ll5 0.0000

G Truck scale 229 57 366 0.1100 6.54E-ll4 9.47E-02 6.08E-lll 0.7031

I SIan Haul Road & Berms 48 0.5000 3.62E-ol 0.3623

L BOF Parkinn Lot 10 0.0265 6.89E-ll6 0.0000

U Short Road 5 0.0426 5.53E-ll6 0.0000

BB OffIce Road 85 0.1136 2.51E-ll4 0.0003

HH Fork Truck Road. oaved section 27 0.1326 9.30E-05 0.0001

KK Strin Mill Parkinn Lot 27 0.0492 3.45E-ll5 0.0000

Total 7.8447

Steubenville Facilitv

A Entrance Road 270 86 74 0.5114 3.59E-D3 6.64E-lll 5.71E-lll 1.2389

B Cold SIrio MIll Road 75 14 74 0.2206 4.30E-ll4 4.66E-02 2.46E-ll1 0.2935

C Cold Slrio Mill Entrance Road 18 8 11 0.1136 5.31E-05 1.37E-02 1.89E-ll2 0.0326

01 Plant Center ROAr!. North 1n 64 19 0.0941 4.33E-ll4 9.09E-ll2 2.70E-ll2 0,1183

02 Plant Cenler Road South 1n 21 19 0.2468 1.13E-D3 7.82E-02 7.08E-02 0.1502

H1 PF Environmental Road 2 45 0.0489 2.54E-06 3.32E-02 0.0332

K Parkinn Lot North of Guard 10 0.0112 2.91E-06 0.0000

L Parkino Lot Soulh of Guard 4 ·0.0205 1.24E-D3 0.0012

Total 1.8681

Follansbee Facilitv ..

A Entrance Road 315 29 15 0.1000 B.18E-ll4 4.38E-ll2 2.26E-ll2 0.0672

B Bvnroduets Plant Road 74 39 0.3200 6.15E-ll4 1.88E-ol 0.1890

C OffIce Road 11 6 0.0800 2.29E-05 7.25E-D3 0.0073

G Plant Center Road 72 66 0.0800 1.50E-ll4 7.97E-02 0.0799

H BaliAN 8 Road 160 90 0.4198 1.74E-ll3 5.70E-lll 0.5722

I Soulh Entrance 43 11 252 0.1000 1.12E-ll4 1.66E-ll2 3.80E-lll 0.3972

Q South Entrance 38 28 56 0.0459 4.53E-05 1.94E-ll2 3.88E-ll2 0.0583

S SInter PlantStorane R~d 2 10 0.3600 1.87E-05 5.44E-ll2 0.0544

Ul Soulh Entrance 5 15 51 0.0500 6.49E-ll6 1.13E-ll2 3.85E-02 0.0498

U2 Soulh Entrance 10 12 306 0.0297 7.71E-ll6 5;38E-D3 1.37E-lll 0.1426

P-l Fenced Parkina Across Rte 7 222 0.5000 2.88E-D3 0.0029

Total 1.6207

1. Vehicle types and weights are as Ialows :

Type Weight

(tons)

A 2

B 15

C 40

o 55 empty

130 full

E 11gempty

154 full

2. Emission Factors from Publication EPA-'45013"-8B-oOO Control of Open Fugitive Dust Sources. Table 2-7. Decision Rule for

Paved Road Emission Estimates.

(

(

(

(

(

(

<.

(

<.

For sL<2 g/m"2 and W<4.4 tons:

EF=O.0081 (SU.7)A.8 =

WheresL=

or

For sL<2 g/m"2 and W>4.4tons:

EF=O.n(sU.35)A.3 =

6.23E-04 IbNMT

Jl.ll5. glmA2

0.03 ozIyd"2

3.62E-lll IbNMT

APPENDIX C, Page'C-12

(

l

(
-(

TABLEC-4

PHYSICAL PARAMETERS FOR UNPAVED ROADS, AREAS AND WIDE BERMS

Road Description Daily Vehicle Passes 1 Length VMT Speed Avg.No. Avg.Weight

A B C D E Total Imn Idav ImDhl Wheels /tons!

Mingo Junction Facility

B Scrao Handlina Road Berms 7 3 12 22 0.19 4.08 5 8 25

0 80" Hot StriD Mill Road Wide Berms 2 7 9 0.31 2.81 5 9 32

E BF - Labor Office Road Berms 56 56 0.11 6.26 5 4 '" 2

H Main Parkino Lot 213 38 251 0.06 15.29 5 5 8

J ShioMiII Road 93 93 0.10 9.04 5 4 92

K Caster Access Road 14 127 3 144 0.02 2.17 5 11 38

M ShiD Mill Area 3 13 13 0.03 0.34 15 4 92

0 Slab Lavdown 3 80 80 0.11 8.86 5 4 92

Q LabParkina 2 85 29 114 0.03 3.78 5 5 5

R BOF 4 Parkina 2 66 33 99 0.03 3.19 5 5 6

S IMSComer 273 51 254 578 0.03 17.52 15 7 20

T UmeArea 7 86 93 0.04 3.52 15 10 37

W River Road 2 2 0.51 1.02 15 4 2

X Used Machine Parts Storaoe Yard 2 10 5 15 0.05 0.74 5 5 6

Y Co06na Tower Area 2 15 8 23 0.07 1.66 5 5 7

Z 44" Bloomina Mill Road 9 9 0.20 1.82 15 4 2

AA Old Heat Treat Road 18 18 0.04 0.68 15 4 2

CC Coil Storaae Yard 2 5 5 0.05 023 5 4 2

DO ,StateStreet Parkina Lot 1 4 20 20 0.04 0.76 5 4 2

EE State Street Parkina Lot 2 4 30 30 0.06 1.70 5 4 2

GG 44" Bloomina MUIStoraae Yard 2 18 18 0.04 0.63 5 4 2

HH Fork Truck Road Unoaved Section 27 27 0.05 1.41 15 4 2

JJ V"lSi1ors' Parkina Area 2 60 13 73 0.06 4.15 5 5 4

Steubenville Facllitv

0 Plant Center Road Wide Berms 35 35 0.30 10.50 5 4 2

E Small Unnaved Roads from Center Road 27 32 59 0.05 322 15 6 9

F West Parkina Lot 100 100 0.04 4.07 5 4 2

G East Parkina Lot 120 120 0.06 7.16 5 4 2

H2 Onen Hearth-Hot Strin Mill Road 2 5 7 0.95 6.67 15 6 11

J ShiD Mill Road - Two 15' Lanes 2 5 7 0.20 1.40 15 6 11

1. Vehicle types and specifications are as follows ;

Type Weight Wheels

(tons)

A 2 4

B 15 7

C 40 11

o 55 empty 4

130 full

E 146 empty 4

200 full

2. Parking lot traffic is based on Daily Vehicle Passes of nearest road.

3. Type 0 vehicles (slab handlers) travel these areas only.

4. Capacity estimated by size.

148 Mean Annual Days With Rain

347 Working Days per Year

Bimonthly means every two 'months.

APPENDIX C, Page .C-13
TABLE C-4 (Continued)

Road Description Dally Vehicle Passes 1 Length VMT Speed Avg. No. Avg.Welght

A B C D Total (mn ldav (moh) Wheels (tons)

Follansbee Facility

D In Front of Coke Ovens - North 10 67 77 0.31 23.87 8.3 4 13

E Behind Coke Ovens 1 15 16 0.44 7.09 5.1 4 14

F From North End of Plantto Koooers 23 5 22 50 0.32 16.00 5.4 6 16

I South Entrance 43 11 252 306 0.05 15.30 7.2 7 26

J Boilerhouse Road 70 74 144 0.13 18.72 5.7 4 9

K In Front of Coke Ovens - South 34 82 116 020 2320 7.4 4 11

L Plant Center Road Behind Batterv 8 5 21 74 100 0.19 19.00 10.3 7 25

M Maintenance Buildina Road 63 34 97 0.10 9.70 8.9 4 7

N To Gate Storaae Lot - Met Station 16 13 16 45 0.06 2.70 8.4 5 16

0 At South End olCoal Storaae 4 21 25 0.06 1.50 5.5 4 13

Q South Entrance 38 28 56 122 0.15 18.79 9.8 6 18

R To Sinter Plant Across Ore Yard 43 43 0.15 6.45 16.0 8 30

T Bv RR Parallel to IMS Road 32 30 151 213 0.45 95:85 11.4 7 24

V Between Koooors and Coal Storaae 3 5 12 20 0.44 8.73 5.9 6 22

X South Entrance 12 120 132 024 31.68 9.9 4 15

Y South Entrance 205 205 0.17 34.52 7.0 8 30

Z South Entrance 26 20 32 78 0.20 15.60 8.8 6 17

IA&AS Over Old Batteries 38 32 70 0.19 13.30 8.4 4 8

AC Bvoroducts Plant 2 22 24 0.18 4.32 5.1 4 14

P-2 Parklna Area Across Rte 7 53

I

53 0.05 2.65 5.0 4 2.

P-3 Entrance Road Parkina 6 6 0.05. 0.30 5.0 4 2

P-4 Sinter /Convenience Buildina Parkina 16 16 0.05 0.85 5.0 4 2

1 Parkina Section 1 9 9 0.03 023 5.0 4 2

2 Parkina Section 2 5 5 0.04 0.18 5.0 . 4 2

3 Parkina Section 3 17 17 0.02 0.41 5.0 4 2

4 Parkina Section 4 16 16 0.03 0.53 5.0 4 2

5 Parkina Section 5 34 34 0.05 1.53 5.0 4 2

1. Vehicle types and specifications are as follows:

Type Weight Wheels

(tons)

A 2 4 Autos

B 15 4 2 axle Trucks & Plant Equipment

C 30 8 3-5 axle Trucks

D 40 4 Euclid

2. ·Parking lot traffic is based on Daily Vehicle Passes of nearest road.

3. Type D vehicles (Euclids) travel these areas only.

4 Capacity estimated by size.

APPENDIX C, Page C-14

(

(

(

(

(

(

l

(

l

l
( TABLE C-5

INITIAL APPLICATION OF CHEMICAL DUST SUPPRESSANT

AT THE WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL CORPORATION

MINGO JUNCTION FACILITY

Mixture =

Application Intensity =

1 part Chemical

Q part Water

1 gal./yd.**2

(

Road Ar~ Chemical Mixture Application Initial Aoolication (aal.)

Section (sa.vds.l !(aalJaoDI.) I(aal./aDDI.) Freauencv* Chemical Mixture

B 653 109 653 1 109 653

0 1100 183 1 100 1 183 1 100

E 798 133 798 1 133 798

H 9,285 1,547 9,285 3 4,642 27,855

J 2,338 390 2,338 2 779 4,677

K 178 30 178 3 89 533

M 2,760 460 2,760 2 920 5,520

0 3,120 520 3120 1 520 3,120

Q 1,458 243 1,458 1 243 1,458

R 1,133 189 1,133 2 378 2,267

S 2,844 474 2,844 2 948 5,689

T 4,444 741 4,444 3 2,222 13,333

W 3,600 600 3,600 3 1,800 10,800

X 3,322 554 3,322 3 1,661 9,967

Y 5,067 844 5,067 1 844 5,067

Z 2,378 396 2,378 1 396 2,378

AA 444 74 444 3 222 1,333

CC 1,467 244 1,467 3 733 4,400

DO 1 111 185 1,111 1 185 1 111

EE 1,333 222 1333 2 444 2,667

GG 1,131 188 1,131 2 377 2,261

HH 168 28 168 1 28 168

JJ 1,000 167 1,000 3 500 3,000

Total galJapplication = 8,522 51,134 18,359 110,155

* Application Frequency is the number of times required during the first two month period of control.

APPENDIX C, Page C-'15

Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corporation C:lc348IreptY2klmjdusLiOO01.wb2. page 1011. 15-Feb-DO
TABLE C-6

INITIAL APPLICATION OF CHEMICAL DUST SUPPRESSANT

AT THE WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL CORPORATION

STEUBENVILLE FACILITY

(

(

(

Mixture = 1 part Chemical

Q partWater

Application Intensity= 1 galJyd.**2

Road Area Chemical Mixture Application * Initial Application {aal.}

Section 'sq.yds.) {gaIJappl.} I{galJappl.} Frequency. Chemical Mixture

D 1408 235 1408 1 235 1408

E 512 85 512 3 256 1536

F 3344 557 3344 2 1 115 6688

G 3325 554 3325 2 1 108 6650

H2 16758 2793 16758 2 5586 33,516

J 3520 587 3520 2 1173 7040

(

Total galJapplication = 4,811 28,867 9,473 56,838

* Application Frequency is the number of times required during the first two month period of control.

APPENDIX C, Page C-16

( (

(

(

(

Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Corporation, SteUbenville stdusU.wb2,page1 of 1, 15-Feb-OO
( TABLE C-'-7

INITIAL APPLICATION OF CHEMICAL DUST SUPPRESSANT

AT THE WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL CORPORATION

FOLLANSBEE FACILITY

Mixture = 1 part Chemical

part Water

Application Intensity = 1 gal.lyd.**2

(

Road Area Chemical Mixture Application Initial ADDlicationlaal.)

Section I(sa.vds.) IlaaIJappl.) !(gaI./appl.) Frequencv· Chemical Mixture

D 2912 485 2,912 1 485 2912

E 2603 434 2603 1 434 2603

F 2254 376 2254 1 376 2254

I 352 59 352 3 176 1,057

J 1221 204 1221 2 407 2,442

K 1409 235 1409 1 235 1409

L 1,785 297 1785 1 297 1785

M 704 117 704 2 235 1409

N 880 147 880 2 293 1,760

0 423 70 423 3 211 1,268

Q 1085 181 1085 3 543 3,256

R 1409 235 1,409 3 704 4227

T 3,698 616 3,698 1 616 3698

V 3077 513 3,077 1 513 3,077

X 1,691 282·· 1,691 2 564 3,381

Y 1186 198 1186 2 395 2,372

Z 1409 235 1409 1 235 1,409

AA&AB 1338 223 1,338 3 669 4,015

AC 1,268 211 1,268 3 634 3804

P-2 4717 786 4717 3 2359 14151

P-3 797 133 797 3 398 2390

P-4 560 93 560 3 280 1679

1 147 24 147 3 73 440

2 205 34 205 3 103 616

3 141 23 141 3 70 422

4 135 22 135 3 67 405

5 264 44 264 3 132 792

5,793 34,758 11,506 66,122

Whe~/ing-PittsburghStool Corporation

* Application Frequency is the number of times required during the first two month period of control.

APPENDIXC, Page C-17

C:lc348Ir~ptY2klfbdusU.wb2.Daa~ 1 of 1. 15-Feb-J
TABLE C-8

FOLLOW-UP APPLICATIONS OF CHEMICAL DUST SUPPRESSANT AT THE

WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL CORPORATION MINGO JUNCTION

FACILITY BASED ON A 52 WEEK/YEAR SEASON DURING INITIAL YEAR

(

(

(

Mixture = 1 part Chemical

Z part Water

Application Intensity = 0.5 galJyd.**2

Road Area Chemical Mixture Application Yearlv Totals /nal.\

Section !{sa.ydsj '{aalJaool.l I{oalJaool.l Freauencv Chemical Mixture

B 653 41 327 4 !vr. - QuarterlY aoolication 163 1307

0 1100 69 550 4 Ivr. - Quarterlv annlication 275 2200

E 798 50 399 4 !yr. - Quarterlv annlication 200 1596

H 9.285 580 4642 4 tYr. - 24 day aoolication 2321 18570

J 2338 146 1169 15 !yr. - 24 day aoolication 2192 17538

K 178 11 89 15 Ivr. -Quarterlv Roolication 167 1333

M 2760 173 1380 15!vr. -Quarterlv Roolication 2588 20700

0 3120 195 1560 15 !vr. - 24 dav aoolication 2925 23400

Q 1458 91 729 4 Ivr. - 24 dav Rnnlication 365 2917

R 1133 71 567 4 !yr. - Monthlv ..nnlication 283 2267

S 2844 178 1422 15 Ivr. - QuarterlY aoolication 2667 21333

T 4444 278 2.222 15 Ivr. -Quarterly aoolication 4167 33333

W 3,600 225 1800 12 /Vr, - 24 day aoolication 2700 21600

X 3322 208 1661 4 /vr. - McmthlYaoolication 831 6644

Y 5067 317 2533 4 !vr. - QuarterlY aoolication 1.267 10133

Z 2378 149 1189 15 Ivr. - Quarterlv aonlication 2.229 17833

AA 444 28 222 12 !vr. - Monthlv aoolication 333 2667

CC 1467 92 733 4 !vr. - Monthlv annlication 367 2933

DO 1 111 69 556 4 !yr. -Quarterly ..nnlication 278 2???

EE 1333 83 667 12 Ivr. - 24 day aoolication 1000 8000

GG 1131 71 565 12 !yr. - 24 day aoolication B4a 6783

HH 168 11 84 4 !vr. - 24 dav Roolication 42 337

JJ 1000 63 500 151vr. - 24 dav annlication 938 7500

(

( (

(

(

Total galJapplication = 3,196 25,567

APPENDIX C, Page C-18

29,143 233,147

WheelinrrPitlsburgh Steel Corporation C:1c348IreptY2klmjdust0001.wb2, page 1 of I, 24-Fe/}{)O
( TABLE C-9

FOLLOW-UP APPLICATIONS OF CHEMICAL DUST SUPPRESSANT AT

THE WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL CORPORATION STEUBENVILLE

FACILITY BASED ON A 52 WEEK/YEAR SEASON

Mixture = 1 part Chemical

7 part Water

Application Intensity = 0.5 gafJyd.·'2

Road Area Chemical Mixture Application Yearlv Totals (oaf.)

Section Ilsa.vds.) I laal.laool.l 'loal.laool.l Freauencv Chemical Mixture

D 1408 88 704 4 /vr. - Quarterlv aoolication 352 2816

E 512 32 256 17 tvr. - Tri-weeklv aoolication 544 4352

F 3344 209 1672 12 tvr. - Monthlv aoolication 2508 20064

G 3.325 208 1,663 12 /vr. - Monthlv aoolication 2494 19,950

H2 16,758 1047 8379 12 tvr. - Monthlv aoolication 12569 100548

J 3520 220 1760 12 tvr. - Monthlv aoolication 2640 21 120

(

(

Total gal.lapplication 1,804 14,434 Total gal.tyr. = 21,106 168,850

APPENDIX C, Page C-19

Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corporation, Mingo Junction C:\c348IreptY2klstdust.wb2, page 1 of 1,24-Feb-OO
TABLE C-10

FOLLOW-UP APPLICATIONS OF CHEMICAL DUST SUPPRESSANT AT

THE WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL CORPORATION FOLLANSBEE

FACILITY BASED ON A 52 WEEK/YEAR SEASON

(

(

(

Mixture = 1 part Chemical

7 part Water

Application Intensity = .Q,Q gaJ.lyd"*2

Road Area Chemical Mixture Application Initial ApPlication (g~

Section .(sa.yds.) .(QaIJappl.) (QaIJappl.) Freauency Chemical Mixture

D 2912 182 1456 26 Ivr. - 2 week application 4732 37853

E 2603 163 1302 26 IYr. - 2 week application 4,230 33841

F 2254 141 1127 26 Ivr. - 2 week application 3663 29304

I 352 22 176 26 Iyr. - 2 week application 572 4579

J 1,221 76 611 26 Ivr. - 2 week aoolication 1,984 15874

K 1409 88 704 26 IYr. - 2 week aoolication 2,289·. 18314

L 1,785 112 892 26 Ivr. - 2 week application 2900 23,201

M 704 44 352 26 Ivr. - 2 week application 1,145 9,158

N 880 55 440 4 Iyr. - Quarterly application 220 1760

0 423 26 211 26 Iyr. - 2 week application 687 5,495

Q 1085 68 543 26 Ivr. - 2 week aoolication 1,763 14,107

R 1,409 88 704 26 Ivr. - 2 week application 2290 18316

T 3698 231 1849 26 Ivr. - 2 week application 6010 48,080

V 3077 192 1,538 26 Ivr. - 2 week application 5,000 39,997

X 1,691 106 845 26 Ivr. - 2 week application 2,747 21,979

Y 1 186 74 593 26 Iyr. - 2 week application 1,928 15,421

Z 1409 88 704 26 IYr. - 2 week application 2289 18314

AA&AB 1,338 84 669 26 Iyr..- 2 week application 2175 17400

AC 1268 79 634 26 IYr. - 2 week aoolication 2,061 16484

P-2 4717 295 2359 4 Ivr. - Quarterly aoolication 1179 9434

P-3 797 50 398 4 IYr. - Quarterly aDolication 199 1 593

P-4 560 35 280 15 Ivr. '- 24 day aoolication 525 4198

1 147 9 73 4 IYr. - Quarterly aoolication 37 293

2 205 13 103 4 Iyr. - Quarterly aoolication 51 411

3 141 9 70 4 Iyr. - Quarterly application 35 282

4 135 8 67 4 Iyr. - Quarterly application 34 270

5 '264 17 132 4 Ivr. - Quarterly application 66 528

(

(

(

(

eeling,PiltsbUfah Steel Corporation

2,172 17,379

APPENDIX C, Page C-20

50,811 368,635

C:\c348lreptY2klfbdust99.wb2, page 1 of 1, 15-Feb-OC

(
r"..

TABLE C-ll

SUMMARY LISTING FROM MECH@X@Y FOR UNPAVED ROADS FOR

MINGO JUNCTION, STEUBENVILLE AND FOLLANSBEE

Length Speed -~---Unpaved-Contro1 using Chemical Suppressants~---- -~-----~--~Unpaved-------~--- Weight Silt Road Segment ID Daily VP (mile) (mph) Wheels ---- Emission Rate (g/s) --- Weeks/ Efficiency ---- Emission Rate (g/s) ---- (ton) (%) Worst Case Annual Applic. (percent) Worst Case Annual --------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------------- -------------- ----------- ----------- -------------- -------------- Mingo Jct B

D

22

9

.1856

.3125 5

5 8

9

25 6 1.355426E-02 7.660892E-03 .13 43 2.367243E-02 .0133797

E 56 .1117 5 4

32 6 1. 177039E-02 6.652647E-03 13 43 2.055692E-02 1. 161881E-02

H 251 .0609 5

2 6 2.505904E-03 1.416341E"'03 13 43 4.376546E-03 2.473631E-03

J 93 ; 1 5

5 8 6 1.636991E-02 9.252301E-03 13 48 3.155573E-02 1.783535E-02

t-t1 K 144 .0151 5

4 92 6 1. 294312E-02 7.315471E-03 3.5 86 9.490819E-02 5.364227E-02

t-t1 M 13 .0261 15

11 38 6 2 .772441E~03 1.566988E"'03 3.5 86 1.981634E-02 1.120023E-02 4 92 6 1.490127E-03 8.422227E-04 3.5 86 3.462618E-03 1. 957078E-03 . l:':l 0 80 .1108 5 4 92 6 1. 297622E-02 7. 334179E~03 3.5 86 9.045872E-02 5.112743E-02 Z

Q 114 .0331 5 5 5 6 3.039376E~03 1.717861E-03 13 46 5.605781E-03 3.168397£-03 t:l

:><:

H

S

R

578

99

.0303

.0322 5 5 6 6 2.917222E-03 1.648819E-03 13 46 5.380482E-03 3.041058E-03

T 93 .0378

15 7 20 6 3.323809E-02 1. 878623E-02 3.5 86 .2437255 .1377541

0 W 2 .5114

15 10 37 6 1.229869E-02 6.951244E-03 3.5 86 9.018283E-02 5.097149E-02 15 4 2 6 3.64525E-04 2.060302E-04 4.3 83 2.14 6853E-03 1. 2134 05E-03 ... X 15 .0492 5 5 6 6 7.132133E-04 4.031094E-04 13 43 1.245623E-03 7.040281E~04 t-t1 y 23 .0719 5 5 7 6 1.780256E-03 1.006204E-03 13 43 3.109207E~03 1. 757329E-03 OJ Z 9 .2027 15 4 2 6 5.222073E-04 ~.951525E-04 3.5 86 3.829197E-03 2.164269E-03 lQ

CD

AA 18 .0379 15 4 2 6 2.431355E-04 1.374206E-04 4.3 83 1.431935E-03 8.09332E~04 CC 5 .0455 5 4 2 6 9. 113907E:-05 5.151196E-05 13 43 1. 591738E-04 8.996532E-05

0 DD 20 .0378 5 4 2 6 2.875463E-04 1.625217E-04 13 46 5.303462E-04 2.997526E-04

I GG·

EE 30 .0568 5 4 2 6 2.092822E-04 1.182866E-04 4.3 82 1.192229E-03 6.738501E-04 18 .035 5 4 2 6 7. 990707E-05 4.516362E-05 4.3 82 4.40789E-04 2.491347E-04 N

f-1 HH 27 .0521 15 4 2 6 1. 53172 6E-03 8.65734E~04 13 48 2.952657E-03 1. 668847E-03 JJ 73 .0588 5 5 4 6 7.631416E-04 4.31329E-04 3.5 86 5.454644E-03 3.082974E:-03 -----.------- ------------ ------------ ------------ .13246182934 .07486765928 .656194741 .37088243082

Steubenville D 35 .3 5 4 2 6 4.206419E-03 2.377475E-03 13 43 7.346484E-03 4.152246E~03 E 59 .0545 15 6 9 6 2.647528E-03 1. 496388E-03 3 89 2.368942E-02 .0133893 F 100 .0407 5 4 2 6 4.596901E~04 2.5·98177E-04 4 ·84 2.847637E-03 1. 60949E-03 G 120 .0597 5 4 2 6 8.09145E-04 4.573301E-04 4 84 5.012401E-03 2.833018E-03 H2 7 .95 15 6 11 6 9.101504E-03 5.144185E-03 4 84 5.638098E-02 3.186663E-02 J 7 .2 15 6 11 6 1. 916106E-03 1. 082986E-03 4 84 1.186968E-02 6.708764E-03 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ .0191403921 .0108181818 .107146602 .060559448
TABLE C-ll (Continued)

93

93

93

93

93

93

93

93

43

93

93

93

93

93

93

93

93

93

93

50

50

88

85

85

85

85

85

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

13

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

13

13

3

4

4

4

4

4

4.301327E-03

8.210017E-04

2.656776E-03

5.129399E-03

1. 790862E-03

3.315937E-03

8.883405E-03

1.215184E-03

4.922863E-03

1.791125E-04

5.988598E-03

5.689724E-03

4.8:20316E-02

1.995206E-03

7.526549E-03

1.344969E-02

4.404319E-03

1.726655E~03

5.037965E-04

5.239738E-04

5.931779E-05

3.822749E~05

1.654525E-05

1.225574E-05

2.083476E-05

2. 941378E-05

9.37564E-05

7.610251E-03

1.45258:2E-03

4.700581E-03

9.075341E-03

3.168535E-03

5.86682E-03

1.57;L723E-02

.00215

8.709922E-03

3.169001E-04

1.059551E-02

1.006671E-02

8.528487E-02

3.530078E-03

1.331657E-02

2.379627E-02

7.792472E"'03

3.054935E-03

8.91357E-04

9.270564E-04

1. 0494 98E-04

6.763513E-05

2.927317E-05

2.168383E-05

3.686252E-05

5.20412E-05

1. 658813E-04

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

-----Unpaved-Control using Chemical Suppressants----- ---~-------Unpaved--~---~---- Silt --~- Emission Rate (g/s) -~- Weeks/ Efficiency ----Emission Rate (g/s) _

(%) Worst Case Annual Applic. (percent) Worst Case Annual

13

14

16

26

9

11

25

7

16

13

18

30

24

22

15

30

17

8

14

2'

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

4

4

6

7

4

4

7

4

5

4

6

8

7

6

4

8

6

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

Weight

Wheels '(ton)

8.3

5.1

5.4

7.2

5.7

7.4

10.3

8.9

8.4

5.5

9.8

16

11.4

5.9

9.9

7

8.8

8.4

5.1

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

.31

.44

.32

.0499

.13

.2

.19

.1

.06

.06

.15

.15

.45

.44

.24

.17

.2

.19

.18

.0499

.05

.0499

.03

. 04

.02

.03

.045

-77

16

50

306

144

116

100

97

45

25

122

43

213

20

132

205

78

70

24

53

6

16

9

5

17

16

34

--------------- _w______ ---------------- - w -------- w_ww --------______ w_ww_______ -- w__ _ _ FollaMbee 0

E

F

I

J

K

L

M

N

o

Q

R

T

V

X

Y

Z

AA&AB

AC

P-2

P-3

P-4

1

2

3

4

5

Length Speed

Road Segment 10 Daily VP (mile) (mph)

;t:l

ttJ

ttJ

Z

tJ

H

:><:

\)

ttJ

PJ

to

(I)

\)

I

N

N

.21850231745 .12349788971

~,

.~ ~'.

,~ ""' r-- r> ,- l~ ,-\, ."", '" -""
(

(

TABLE C-12

CONTROL EFFICIENCIES FOR ON-GOING CONTROL PROGRAMS

Control Efficiencies for Monthly Applications

Ground Inventory 1- Month Average Running Average

Averaging Application (gallyd 2 chemical Control Efficiency Control Efficiency

Period Concentration at start of period from EPA-450/3-88-008 (%)

Figure 3-4 l%l

Jan 1 - Feb 1 1.00 gaVyd of 1: 6 solution 0.143 78 78

Feb 1 - Mar 1 0.50 gaVyd of 1: 12 solution 0.181 84 81

Mar 1 -Apr 1 0.50 gallyd of 1: 12 solution 0.220 89 84

Apr1-May1 0.50 gallyd of 1: 12 solution 0.258 90 85

May 1 -Jun 1 0.50 gaVyd of 1: 12 solution 0.297 90 86

Jun 1 - Jul1 0.50 gaVyd of 1: 12 solution 0.335 90 87

Jul1 -Aug 1 0.50 gaVyd of 1: 12 solution 0.374 90 87

Aug 1 - Sep 1 0.50 gaVyd of 1: 12 solution 0.412 90 88

Sep1-0ct1 0.50 gaVyd of 1: 12 solution 0.451 90 88

Oct 1 -Nov 1 0.50 gaVyd of 1: 12 solution 0.489 90 88

Nov 1 - bec 1 0.50 gaVyd .of 1: 12 solution 0.527 90 88

Dec 1-Jan 1 0.50 aaVvd of 1: 12 solution 0.566 90 89

Control Efficiencies for Bimonthly Applications

Ground Inventory 2- Month Average Running Average

Averaging Application (gal/yd 2 chemical Control Efficiency Control Efficiency

Period Concentration at start of period from EPA-45013-88-00B (%)

& MECH@X@Y (%)

Jan 1 - Mar 1 1.00 gaVyd of 1: 6 solution 0.143 58 58

Mar 1·-May 1 0.50 gallyd of 1: 12 solution 0.181 62 60

May 1 - Jul1 0.50 gaVyd of 1: 12 solution 0.220 67 \

, 62

Jul1-Sep 1 0.50 gaVyd of 1: 12 solution 0.258 67 64

Sep1-Nov1 0.50 gaVyd of 1: 12 solution 0.297 67 64

Nov 1 -Jan 1 0.50 oavVd of 1: 12 solution 0.335 67 65

APPENDIX C, Page C-23
t"iJ

t"iJ

t:r:I

Z

tJ

H

:x:

o

t"iJ

III

I.Q

CD

o

I

N

TABLE C-13

CHEMICAL APPLICATIONS FOR ON-GOING PROGRAMS BASED ON "CONTROL OF OPEN FUGITIVE DUST SOURCES"

• WorstCase Control Controlled PM10 Road DescrlpUoll Dally Vehicle Pa8Ses 1 Length VMT speed Avg. No. Avg.Welght AppllcaUon Uncontrolled Efficiency (g/s)

A B C D E Total Imll /dav ImDhl Wheels ltonsl Frsouencv PM10/n/sl 10/01 WorstCe88 Annual Mlnno Junction Facllltv

B Ser·n Handllno Road Benns 7 3 12 22 0.19 4.08 5 8 25 Bimonthlv 0.0247 65 0.0087 0.0049

0 80" Hot Strln Mill Road Wide Benns 2 7 9 0.31 2.81 5 9 32 Blmonthlv 0.0188 65 0.0066 0.0038

E BF - Labor Office Road Banns 56 56 0.11 6.26 5 4 2 Blmonthlv 0.0139 65 0.0049 0.0028

H Main Parklnn Lot 213 38 251 0.06 15.29 5 5 8 Blmonthlv 0.0584 65 0.0206 0.0116

J Strlo Mill Road 93 93 0.10 c9.04 5 4 92 Monthlv 0.0929 89 0.0107 0.0060

K Caster Access Road 14 127 3 144 0.02 2.17 5 11 38 Monthlv 0.0156 89 0.0018 0.0010

M Strlo Mill Area • 13 13 0.03 0.34 15 4 92 Monthlv 0.0105 89 0.0012 0.0007

a Slab L,vdown • 80 80 0.11 6.86 5 4 92 MOnthlv 0.0911 89 0.D105 0.0059

Q Lab Parkino • 65 29 114 0.03 3.78 5 5 5 Bimonthi~ 0.0124 65 0.0044 0.0025

R BOF 4 Parklnn • 66 33 99 0.03 3.19 5 5 6 Blmonthlv 0.0112 65 0.0040 0.0022

S IMSComer 273 51 254 578 0.03 17.52 15 7 20 Monthlv 0.2924 89 0.0336 0.0190

T UmeArea 7 86 93 0.04 3.52 15 10 37 Monthlv 0.0756 89 0.0087 0.0049

W River Road 2 2 0.51 1.02 15 4 2 Blmonthlv 0.0068 65 0.0024 0.0014

X Used Machine Parts Storaoe Yard , 10 5 c

15 0.05 0.74 5 5 6 Blmonthlv 0.0026 65 0.0009 0.0005

Y Coolin" Tower Area , 15 8 23 0.07 1.66 5 5 7 Monthlv 0.0059 89 0.0007 0.0004

Z 44" Bloomln':' Mill Road 9 9 0.20 1.82 15 4 2 Monthlv 0.0122 89 0.0014 0.0008

AA Old Heat Treat Road 18 18 0.04 0.68 15 4 2 Blmonthlv 0.0045 65 0.0016c 0.0009

CC Coli Storaoe Yard , 5 5 0.05 0.23 5 4 2 Blmonthlv 0.0005 65 0.0002 0.0001

DO State Street Parkin" Lot 1 • 20 20 0.04 0.76 5 4 2 Monthlv . 0.0017 89 0.0002 0.0001

EE State Slreet Parklno Lot 2 • 30 30 0.06 1.70 5 4 2 Monthlv 0.0038 89 0.0004 0.0002

GG 44" Bloomlnn Mill Storaoe Vard , 18 18 0.04 0.63 5 4 2 Blmonthlv 0.0014 65 0.0005 0.0003

HH Fork Truck Road Unnaved Section 27 27 0.05 1.41 15 4 2 Monthlv 0.0094 89 0.0011 0.0006

JJ Visitors' Parklon Area • 60 13 73 0.06 4.15 5 5 4 Monthlv 0.0125 89 0.0014 0.0008

0.7788 0.1264 0.0714

SteUbenville Facllltv

0 Plant Center Road Wide Benns 35 35 0.30 10.50 5 4 2 Blmonthlv 0.0233 65 0.0082 0.0046

E Small Unoaved Roads from Center Road 27 32 59 0.05 3.22 15 6 9 Monthlv 0.0392 89 0.0045 0.0025

F West Parkin" Lot 100 100 0.04 4.07 5 4 2 Monthlv . 0.0090 89 0.0010 0.0006

G East Parkinn Lot 120 120 0.06 7.16 5 4 2 Monlhlv 0.0159 89 0.0018 0.0010

H2 Onen Hearth-Hot Strln Mill Road 2 5 7 0.95 6.67 15 6 11 Monthlv 0.0888 89 0.0102 0.0058

J Slrln Mill Road - Two 15' Lanes 2 5 7 0.20 1.40 15 6 11 Monthlv 0.Q186 89 0.0021 0.0012

0.1949 0.0279 0.0158

1. Vehicle types and specifications are as follows:

Type Weight Wheels 148 Mean Annual Days With Rain

(tons) 347 Working Days per Year

A 2 4 Bimonthly means ~ery two months.

B 15 7 6 % Typical Slit content

C 40 11 0.2 % Surface matenal moisture content

o 55 empty 4

130 full

E 146 empty 4

200 full

rParklng lot traffic Is based on Dally Vehicle Passes of nearest road.

c 'rype 0 vehicles (slab handlers) travel these areas only.

Capacity eslimaied by size.

r Enetm' &' Enwronmsfl'-"'\fansaBmenf. Inc. o (\ .'- r . ,"-""

~.

C.1c34B1r8PjX?,k'lJelrlnOOO2.wb2. _. 1 of 1. ~.IHJO. r-,
TABLEC-13 (Continued)

---.

:J::l

''Ll

'Ll

t:'1

Z

o

H

:><

()

'Ll

l1J

to

CD

()

I

N

(Jl

: 5 WorstC8se Control Controlled PM10

Road Description Dally VehIcle Passes 1 Length VMT Speed Avg.No. Avg.Welght ApplicatIon Uncontrolled Efficiency (g/s)

A B C DTotill 1mII Idav (mphl Wheels (tonsl Freauencv PM101a/s\ 1%\ Worst Case Annual

FoIlansbee Facility

D In Front of Coke Ovens - North 10 67 n 0.31 23.67 8.3 4 13 Monthlv 0.1870 89 0.0215 0.0121

E Behind Coke Ovens 1 15 16 0.44 7.09 5.1 4 14 Monthlv 0.0349 89 0.0040 0.0023

F From North End of Plant to Koppers 23 5 22 50 0.32 16.00 5.4 6 16 Monthlv 0.0877 89 0.0101 0.0057

I South Entrance 43 11 252 306 0.05 15.30 7.2 7 26 Monthlv 0.1356 95 0.0068 0.0038

J aciilerhouse Road 70 74 144 0.13 18.72 5.7 4 9 Monthlv 0.0857 89 0.0098 0.0056

K In Front of Coke Ovens - South· 34 82 116 0.20 23.20 7.4 4 11 Monthlv 0.1513 89 0.0.174 0.0098

L Plant Center Road Behind Battery 8 5 21 74 100 0.19 19.00 10.3 7 25 Monthlv 0.2410 89 0.0277 0.0156

M Maintenance Bulldlno Road 63 34 97 0.10 9.70 8.9 4 7 Monthlv 0.0620 89 0.0071 0.0040

N To Gate Storaoe Lot - Met Station 16 13 16 45 0.06 2.70 8.4 5 16 Blmonthlv 0.0230 65 0.0081 0.0046

0 At South End of Coal Storaae 4 21 25 0.06 1.50 5.5 4 13 Monthlv 0.0078 89 0.0009 0.0005

Q South Entrance 38 28 56 122 0.15 18.79 9.8 6 18 Monthlv 0.1959 69 0.0225 0.0127

R To Sinter Plant Across Ore Yard 43 43 0.15 6.45 16.0 8 30 Monthlv 0.1355 89 0.0156 0.0088

T av RR Parallel to IMS Road 32 30 151 213 0.45 95.85 11.4 7 24 Monthlv 1.3009 89 0.1494 0.0844

V Between Koooers and Coal Stora!:le 3 5 12 20 0.44 8.73 5.9 6 22 Monthlv 0.0598 89 0.0069 0.0039

X South Entrance 12 120 132 0.24 31.68 9.9 4 15 Monthlv 0.3123 89 0.0359 0.0203

Y South Entrance 205 205 0.17 34.52 7.0 8 30 Monthlv 0.3172 89 0.0364 0.0206

Z South Entrance 26 20 32 78 0.20 15.60 8.8 6 17 Monthlv 0.1433 89 0.0165 0.0093

AA&AB Over Old Batteries 38 32 70 0.19 13.30 8.4 4 8 Monthlv 0.0862 89 0.0099 0.0056

AC Bvoroducts Plant 2 22 24 0.18 4.32 5.1 4 14 Monthlv 0.0212 89 0.0024 0.0014

P-2 Parkino Area Across Rte 7 53 53 0.05 2.65 5.0 4 2 Blmonthlv 0.0059 65 0.0021 0.0012

P-3 Entrance Road Parkino 6 6 0.05 0.30 5.0 4 2 Monthlv 0.0007 89 0.0001 0.0000

P-4 SinterIConvenlence Bulldino Parklno 16 16 0.05 0.85 5.0 4 2 Monthlv 0.0019 89 0.0002 0.0001

1 Parkina Section 1 9 9 0.03 0.23 5.0 4 2 Monthlv 0.0005 89 0.0001 0.0000

2 Park/no Section 2 5 5 0.04 0.18 5.0 4 2 Monthlv 0.0004 89 0.0000 0.0000

3 Parkino Section 3 17 17 0.02 0.41 5.0 4 2 Monthlv 0.0009 89 0.0001 0.0001

4 Parkino Section 4 16 16 0.03 0.53 5.0 4 2 Monthlv 0.0012 89 0.0001 0.0001

5 Parklno Section 5 34 34 0.05 1.53 5.0 4 2 Monthlv 0.0034 89 0.0004 0.0002

3.6032 0.4119 0.2328

1. Vehicle types and speclficatlons are as follows:

Type Weight Wheels

(tons)

A 2 4 Autos

B 154 2 axle Trucks & Plant Equipment

C 30 8 3-5 axle Trucks

D 40 4 Euclid

2. Parking lot traffic Is based on Daily Vehicle Passes of nearest road.

3. Type Dvehicles (Eucllds) travel these areas only.

4 Capacity estimated by size.

5. Bimonthly is every twa months.