alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"22-1326: USADATA INCORPORATED v. DATAWIDGET LLC [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"sZgv2fV2JY\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/12-13-2022-22-1326-usadata-incorporated-v-datawidget-llc-rule-36-judgment-22-1326-rule_36_judgment-12-13-2022_2047096\/\">22-1326: USADATA INCORPORATED v. DATAWIDGET LLC [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/12-13-2022-22-1326-usadata-incorporated-v-datawidget-llc-rule-36-judgment-22-1326-rule_36_judgment-12-13-2022_2047096\/embed\/#?secret=sZgv2fV2JY\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“22-1326: USADATA INCORPORATED v. DATAWIDGET LLC [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"sZgv2fV2JY\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"RULE 36 JUDGMENT Posted: USADATA INCORPORATED v. DATAWIDGET LLC [RULE 36 JUDGMENT](pdf) Appeal Number: 22-1326 Origin: DCT Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER  SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I,
Robert Kocienski, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of American Wagering, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and the internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date: May 17, 2011

/s/ ROBERT KOCIENSKI Principal Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)


---



QuickLinks
Grafton

No. 81-450

#### Joseph S. Haas, Jr. v. Town of Ashland

October 12, 1982

*Joseph S. Haas, Jr.,*of Ashland, pro se.

*Snierson, Chandler & McKean,*of Laconia *(Edgar D. McKean, III,*on the brief and orally), for the defendant.

Memorandum Opinion

This case involves the plaintiffs assertion that the Cathedral of the Beechwoods should have received a local property tax exemption as a church. The plaintiff received a mail order certificate granting him the title of Bishop from the Universal Life Church of Modesto, California, in return for paying ten dollars. After having been denied his local tax exemption, the plaintiff sought relief before the superior court. The Superior Court *(Johnson,*J.) denied his appeal, stating that the Cathedral of the Beechwoods was not a building “used principally for religious training or for other religious purposes.” RSA 72:23 III.

One of the plaintiffs principal arguments is that because he had registered with the Secretary of State of New Hampshire as a religious organization he should be exempt from local taxation. The stated purpose of the plaintiff’s corporation is “to search for the holy grail and other treasures.” This case is quite similar to the fact pattern recently before us in *New Canaan Academy, Inc. v. Town of Canaan,*122 N.H. 134, 441 A.2d 1174 (1982), under an analogous tax exemption provision, RSA 72:23 IV. The claim therein that a federal tax exemption under I.R.C. § 501(c)(3) was binding on State courts was rejected, as is the plaintiff’s appeal herein. Alternatively, the plaintiff asserts that his property was improperly assessed as a commercial building and apartments; however, the superior court *866found to the contrary. Reviewing the record, we find no reversible error.

*Affirmed.*
#### § 5.401 Applicable rules.

In addition to the rules in this subpart, medical testing experimental applicants and licensees must follow the rules in subparts B and C of this part. In case of any conflict between the rules set forth in this subpart and the rules set forth in subparts B and C of this part, the rules in this subpart shall govern.
EX-420



		

			 

		




		
			EXHIBIT 4.20
		

		
			February 3, 2017
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Perceptron, Inc.
		

		
			47827 Halyard Dr.
		

		
			Plymouth, Michigan 48170
		

		
			Re:Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of November 16, 2010, by and between Perceptron, Inc. (“Company”) and Comerica Bank (as amended, “Credit Agreement”)
		

		
			Gentlemen:
		

		
			Company has advised the Bank that it has violated the provisions of Section 7.11 of the Credit Agreement for the period ended December 31, 2016 (the “Covenant Violation”). Company has requested that the Bank waive any Event of Default under the Credit Agreement resulting from the Covenant Violation. The Bank hereby waives the Covenant Violation (“Waiver”).
		

		
			This Waiver shall not be deemed to amend or alter in any respect the terms and conditions of the Credit Agreement, or to constitute a waiver or release by the Bank of any right, remedy Default or Event of Default under the Credit Agreement, except to the extent expressly set forth above. Furthermore, this Waiver shall not affect in any manner whatsoever any rights or remedies of the Bank with respect to any other non-compliance by the Company with the Credit Agreement or the Loan Documents whether in the nature of an Event of Default or otherwise, and whether now in existence or subsequently arising.
		

		
			Except as specifically defined to the contrary herein, capitalized terms used in this Waiver shall have the meanings given them in the Credit Agreement.
		

		
			Very truly yours,
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			COMERICA BANK
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			By: /s/ Lydia R. Mansoor
		

		
			
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Its: Officer
		

		
			﻿
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"17-1594: YEDA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT v. MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. [OPINION], Precedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"QJQMAkdHqz\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/10-12-2018-17-1594-yeda-research-and-development-v-mylan-pharmaceuticals-inc-opinion-17-1594-opinion-10-12-2018\/\">17-1594: YEDA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT v. MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. [OPINION], Precedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/10-12-2018-17-1594-yeda-research-and-development-v-mylan-pharmaceuticals-inc-opinion-17-1594-opinion-10-12-2018\/embed\/#?secret=QJQMAkdHqz\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“17-1594: YEDA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT v. MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. [OPINION], Precedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"QJQMAkdHqz\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Opinions\/Orders posted: YEDA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT v. MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. [OPINION](pdf) Appeal Number: 17-1594 Origin: PTO Precedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
9 June 2016

087A16

#### In the Matter of Mary Lucille Hughes, by and through Virginia Hughes Ingram, Administratrix of the Estate of Mary Lucille Hughes, Claim for Compensation Under the North Carolina Eugenics Asexualization and Sterilization Compensation Program

1. Claimant’s Notice .of Appeal Based Upon a Dissent (COA15-699)

L-

2. Claimant’s PDR as to Additional Issues

2. Denied

3. Claimant’s Motion to Consolidate Appeals

3. Allowed

4. State’s Notice of Appeal Based Upon a Dissent

4.-

5. State’s PDR as to Additional Issues *

5. Allowed

6. State’s Motion to Consolidate Appeals

6. Allowed
§ 64.6303 Caller ID authentication in non-IP networks. ( a ) Except as provided in §§ 64.6304 and 64.6306, not later than June 30, 2021, a voice service provider shall either: ( 1 ) Upgrade its entire network to allow for the initiation, maintenance, and termination of SIP calls and fully implement the STIR/SHAKEN framework as required in § 64.6301 throughout its network; or
( 2 ) Maintain and be ready to provide the Commission on request with documented proof that it is participating, either on its own or through a representative, including third party representatives, as a member of a working group, industry standards group, or consortium that is working to develop a non-internet Protocol caller identification authentication solution, or actively testing such a solution.
( b ) Except as provided in § 64.6304, not later than June 30, 2023, a gateway provider shall either: ( 1 ) Upgrade its entire network to allow for the processing and carrying of SIP calls and fully implement the STIR/SHAKEN framework as required in § 64.6302(c) throughout its network; or
( 2 ) Maintain and be ready to provide the Commission on request with documented proof that it is participating, either on its own or through a representative, including third party representatives, as a member of a working group, industry standards group, or consortium that is working to develop a non-internet Protocol caller identification authentication solution, or actively testing such a solution.
( c ) Except as provided in § 64.6304, not later than December 31, 2023, a non-gateway intermediate provider receiving a call directly from an originating provider shall either: ( 1 ) Upgrade its entire network to allow for the processing and carrying of SIP calls and fully implement the STIR/SHAKEN framework as required in § 64.6302(d) throughout its network; or
( 2 ) Maintain and be ready to provide the Commission on request with documented proof that it is participating, either on its own or through a representative, including third party representatives, as a member of a working group, industry standards group, or consortium that is working to develop a non-internet Protocol caller identification authentication solution, or actively testing such a solution.
[87 FR 42946, July 18, 2022, as amended at 87 FR 75944, Dec. 12, 2022; 88 FR 40118, June 21, 2023]
Partner AFCEA To Host Wounded Warrior Event Feb 7th
 By Patricia Coopersmith
    
 Honor  |  Valor |  Sacrifice   Our Nation's Warriors defend our freedoms at home and abroad. Many of our young men and women have suffered deep physical wounds; wounds they will carry for the rest of their lives. Please join us on 7 February 2015 for an evening of elegance to honor our Wounded Warriors. Our Guests of Honor will be service members currently undergoing treatment at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Bethesda, attending with their loved ones. Join us in recognizing their sacrifices with a joyful event guaranteed to raise their spirits. For over 30 years, the Black Tie Tribute event has brought together nearly 700 industry, military, and Federal Government telecommunications and IT professionals and their spouses to honor our veterans. In addition, the event is an opportunity for Industry partners to reinforce their commitment to the community. This year, as in the past, any surplus funds from the Black Tie Tribute event go towards educational scholarships through the AFCEA NOVA Scholarship Fund. Scholarships are available to students studying the hard sciences including mathematics, information technology, computer science, and others. Phone:
 Google Maps
  https://www.afceanova.org/tribute2015
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Attending Oral Arguments - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"fUTZ4qWgjh\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/oral-argument\/attending-oral-arguments\/\">Attending Oral Arguments<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/oral-argument\/attending-oral-arguments\/embed\/#?secret=fUTZ4qWgjh\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Attending Oral Arguments” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"fUTZ4qWgjh\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"COVID-19 Protocol Notice:\u00a0The court has issued new\u00a0Revised Protocols for In-Person Arguments for arguing counsel. Court sessions are open to the public with multiple panels of the court typically sitting each day during the first full week of each month. Before attending an argument at the Federal Circuit, please take a moment to review the following […]"}
EXHIBIT
10.71


NOTE


	
  

  	
  December 15, 2006

  
	
  $26,000,000.00

  	
  Chicago, Illinois

  



 


The undersigned, for value received, promises to pay
to the order of LaSalle Bank National Association (the “Lender”) at the
principal office of LaSalle Bank National Association (the “Administrative
Agent”) in Chicago, Illinois the aggregate unpaid amount of all Loans made
to the undersigned by the Lender pursuant to the Credit Agreement referred to
below (as shown on the schedule attached hereto (and any continuation thereof)
or in the records of the Lender), such principal amount to be payable on the
dates set forth in the Credit Agreement.


The undersigned further promises to pay interest on
the unpaid principal amount of each Loan from the date of such Loan until such
Loan is paid in full, payable at the rate(s) and at the time(s) set forth in
the Credit Agreement.  Payments of both
principal and interest are to be made in lawful money of the United States of
America.


This Note evidences indebtedness incurred under, and
is subject to the terms and provisions of, the Second Amended and Restated
Credit Agreement, dated as of December 15, 2006 (as amended, restated,
supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Credit Agreement”;
terms not otherwise defined herein are used herein as defined in the Credit
Agreement), among the undersigned, certain financial institutions (including
the Lender) and the Administrative Agent, to which Credit Agreement reference
is hereby made for a statement of the terms and provisions under which this
Note may or must be paid prior to its due date or its due date accelerated.


[Signature page to Note]











This Note is made under and governed by the laws of
the State of Illinois applicable to contracts made and to be performed entirely
within such State.


	
   

  	
  LECG, LLC

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By: 

  	
  /s/ JOHN C. BURKE

  
	
   

  	
  Title: 

  	
  Chief Financial Officer

  



 


[Signature page to Note]
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4857

To make small business concerns eligible to participate in the health benefits

program under chapter 89 of title 5, United States Code.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 29, 1994

Mr. ISTOOK (for himself, Mr. HORN, Mr. CANADY, Mr. ZIMMER, Mr. LEVY,

Mr. UPTON, and Mr. MCHALE) introduced the following bill; which was

referred jointly to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, Post Office

and Civil Service, and Education and Labor

A BILL

To make small business concerns eligible to participate in

the health benefits program under chapter 89 of title

5, United States Code.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS.

4 For the purpose of this Act—

5 (1) the term ‘‘FEHBP’’ means the health bene6 fits program under chapter 89 of title 5, United

7 States Code;
2

•HR 4857 IH

1 (2) the term ‘‘small business concern’’ means

2 an employer with 100 or fewer employees, as further

3 defined under regulations of the Director; and

4 (3) the term ‘‘Director’’ means the Director of

5 the Office of Personnel Management.

6 SEC. 2. PROVISIONS RELATING TO SMALL BUSINESS CON7 CERNS.

8 (a) ELIGIBILITY.—Eligibility to participate in

9 FEHBP shall be afforded to employees of small business

10 concerns in accordance with the plan prescribed under

11 subsection (b).

12 (b) PLAN.—

13 (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 6 months

14 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Di15 rector shall, after consultation with appropriate ex16 perts, representatives, and officials, transmit to the

17 Congress—

18 (A) a comprehensive plan providing for the

19 orderly transition of FEHBP in order to carry

20 out the purpose of this section, including a

21 timetable under which such transition shall be

22 completed not later than 2 years after the date

23 of the enactment of this Act; and

24 (B) recommendations for any legislation

25 which the Director considers necessary in order
3

•HR 4857 IH

1 to carry out the plan described in subparagraph

2 (A), including recommendations for the repeal

3 or modification of appropriate provisions of law.

4 (2) INTERMEDIARY GROUPS; ADMINISTRATIVE

5 COSTS.—The plan shall include provisions under

6 which—

7 (A) small business concerns with 50 or

8 fewer employees shall be required to form

9 groups of at least 50 employees as a condition

10 for eligibility; and

11 (B) any additional administrative expenses

12 resulting from the implementation of the plan

13 shall be borne by small business concerns and

14 their employees.

Æ