alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 36
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 74 FR 23956, May 22, 2009, 77 FR 30411, May 23, 2012, 82 FR 25538, June 2, 2017, and corrected at 83 FR 4153, Jan. 30, 2018. Nomenclature changes to part 36 also appear at 83 FR 63587, Dec. 11, 2018, and 84 FR 4360, Feb. 15, 2019.

§ 36.213 Network access services revenues. ( a ) End User Revenue—Account 5081. Revenues in this account are directly assigned on the basis of analysis and studies.
( b ) Switched Access Revenue—Account 5082. Revenues in this account are directly assigned on the basis of analysis and studies.
( c ) Special Access Revenue—Account 5083. Revenues in this account are directly assigned on the basis of analysis and studies.
[52 FR 17299, May 6, 1987, as amended at 69 FR 12550, Mar. 17, 2004]
###### Editorial Note on Part 36

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 74 FR 23956, May 22, 2009, 77 FR 30411, May 23, 2012, 82 FR 25538, June 2, 2017, and corrected at 83 FR 4153, Jan. 30, 2018. Nomenclature changes to part 36 also appear at 83 FR 63587, Dec. 11, 2018, and 84 FR 4360, Feb. 15, 2019.

#### § 36.501 General.

For separations purposes, reserves and deferrals include the following accounts:

| Other Jurisdictional Assets—Net | Account 1500. |
| --- | --- |
| Accumulated Depreciation | Account 3100. |
| Accumulated Depreciation—Property Held for Future Telecommunications Use | Account 3200. |
| Accumulated Amortization—Capital Leases | Account 3400. |
| Net Current Deferred Operating Income Taxes | Account 4100. |
| Net Noncurrent Deferred Operating Income Taxes | Account 4340. |
| Other Jurisdictional Liabilities and Deferred Credits—Net | Account 4370. |

[69 FR 12553, Mar. 17, 2004, as amended at 83 FR 63587, Dec. 11, 2018]
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Carl A. Pelzel, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report of Depomed, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



March 6,
2009

By:

/s/ CARL A. PELZEL Carl A. Pelzel Chief Executive Officer


---
Case 65. — ACTION BETWEEN J. M. WJLEY AND LANGHORN, & JOHNSON CO., DETERMINED ON MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

May 18.

#### Langhorn, Johnson & Co. v. Wiley.

Appeal from Johnson Cirenit Court.

Motion to dismiss appeal.

Sustained.

Appeals — Failure to File Transcript — Dismissal—Under sec. 738 of the Civil Code, providing that “the appellant shall file the transcript in the office of-the clerk of the Court of Appeals at least twenty days before the first day of the second term of said court next after the granting of the appeal,” where an appeal was granted on November 22, 1904, and the appeal 'bond was given on December 12, and the supersedeas was issued on December 13, the appellee, by filing a copy of the judgment and 'bond in this court on May 16 following, was entitled on his motion to have the appeal dismissed.

WALTER S. HARKIN, D. J. WHEELER and C. M. COOPER for appellant.

C. B. WHEELER for appellee.

Opinion by

Chief Justice Hobson

Dismissing appeal.

The judgment appealed from was rendered and the appeal was granted on November 22, 1904. The appeal bond was given on December 12th; the supersedeas issued on December 13th. On May 16th appellee filed a copy of the judgment and bond, and entered a motion to dismiss the appeal, the record not having been filed in this court by the appellant. In response to the motion appellant shows that time was given to file a bill of exceptions; that after the hill of exceptions was filed the clerk did not complete the t’ mscript, and for this reason, it was not filed for the *512April term, although appellant used every effort to get it made out.

Section 738 of the Civil Code of Practice is as follows: “The appellant shall file the transcript in the office of the clerk of the Court of Appeals at least twenty days before the first day of the second term of said court next after the granting of the appeal, unless the court extend the time; as, for cause shown, the court may do.”

Section 740 is as follows: “No appeal shall be docketed by the clerk until the appellant complies with the provisions of sec. seven hundred and thirty-nine (739), and if he fail to file the transcript within the time allowed by sec. seven hundred and thirty-eight (738), or by the court pur-' suant thereto, his appeal shall be dismissed.” The facts stated in the response would* be sufficient to justify the court in extending the time for filing the transcript as provided in sec. 738, if a motion to this effect had been made in this court by appellant before the time expired. But after the time has expired the court is without power in the premises, and under the mandate of the statute the appeal must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.
§ 51.905 Implementation. ( a ) The rates set forth in this section are default rates. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Commission's rules, telecommunications carriers may agree to rates different from the default rates.
( b ) LECs who are otherwise required to file tariffs are required to tariff rates no higher than the default transitional rates specified by this subpart. ( 1 ) With respect to interstate switched access services governed by this subpart, LECs shall tariff rates for those services in their federal tariffs. Except as expressly superseded below, LECs shall follow the procedures specified in part 61 of this chapter when filing such tariffs.
( 2 ) With respect to Transitional Intrastate Access Services, originating access charges for Toll Free Calls, and Toll Free Database Query Charges governed by this subpart, LECs shall follow the procedures specified by relevant state law when filing intrastate tariffs, price lists or other instruments (referred to collectively as “tariffs”).
( c ) Nothing in this section shall be construed to require a carrier to file or maintain a tariff or to amend an existing tariff if it is not otherwise required to do so under applicable law.
( d ) Beginning July 1, 2021, and notwithstanding any other provision of the Commission's rules in this chapter, only the originating carrier in the path of the Toll Free Call may assess a Toll Free Database Query Charge for a Toll Free Call. When the originating carrier is unable to transmit the results of the Toll Free Database Query to the next carrier or provider in the call path, that next carrier or provider may instead assess a Toll Free Database Query Charge.
[76 FR 73856, Nov. 29, 2011, as amended at 85 FR 75916, Nov. 27, 2020]
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
I, Carl E. Vogel, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CC VHoldings, LLC and CC V Holdings Finance, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrants as of, and for,the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants’ other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrants and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrants,including their consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) [Reserved];  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrants’ disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrants’ internal control over financialreporting that occurred during theregistrants’ most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrants’ fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrants’ internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants’ other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrants’auditors and the audit committee of the registrants’ board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrants’ ability to record,process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrants’internal control over financial reporting.
Date: August 13, 2004 /s/ Carl E. VogelCarl E. VogelChief Executive Officer
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 8- 28 05

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el le e

v.

Jo se Co rio -Raym

un do , als o k no wn as Jo se Raym un do -Co rio

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll an t

__

__ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Nor th ern Dis tri ct of I owa - Ced ar Ra pi ds

__

__ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: Apri l 1 7, 2 01 9 Fil ed : Ap ril 22 , 20 19 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re LOKEN, GRUEND ER, an d S HEPHERD, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Fo ll owi ng a jury tr ia l, Jo se Co ri o
- R a y m un do was fo un d gu il ty o f kn owi ng ly

us in g a fo rg ed id en ti fic at io n do cu m en t as ev id en ce of au th or iz ed em pl oym en t, in vi ol at io n of 18 U.S.C. § 15 46 (a), an d of m is us in g fo r ta x pu rp os es a so ci al se cu rit y

n u mb e r no t as si gn ed to hi m , in vi ol at io n of 42 U.S.C. § 40 8( a)(7 )(B)

. The di s t r i c tco ur t se nt en ced Co rio -Raym un do to si x m on th s in pr i s on an d th ree y ears of 1

su pe rv is ed rel eas e, an d he ap pe al s, ch al le ng in g th e su ffi ci e n cy of th e ev id en ce
su pp or ti ng th e jury verd ic t an d t he reas on ab le ne ss of t he sen te nc e.

The ev id en ce at tri al es ta bl is he d, in pa rt, th at Co rio -Raym un do ack no wled ge d hi s wor k in el ig ib il i t y du rin g an en co un te r wit h an Im m ig rat io n an d Cu st om s En f o r cem en t em

pl oyee earl ie r in th e y ear be fo re he pr ov id ed an em pl oyer wi t h a Fo rm I-9 an d a Fo rm W -4 be ari ng hi s na m e an d a s oc ia l se cu rit y acco un t nu m be r
as si gn ed to an ot he r pe rs on , a s well as a fr a u d u l e nt ve rs io n of a so ci al se cu rit y card wit h Co rio -Raym

un do ’s na m e an d th at sa m e so ci al se cu rit y acco un t nu m be r. Viewe d in a li gh t m os t fav or ab le to th e v e r d i c t , th is ev id en ce was su ffi ci en t to pr ov e th e el em en ts of th e of

fen se s be y on d a reas on ab le do ub t. See Uni te d St at es v. Ma ch or ro -Xo ch ic al e, 84 0 F.3 d 54 5, 54 8 (8 th Ci r. 20 16 ) (s et ti ng fo rth st an da rd of

rev ie w an d el em en ts of of fen se s) , cert

. de ni ed , 13 7 S. Ct

. 12 14 (2 01 7)

. W e al so reject Co rio -Raym

un do ’s ch al le ng e to th e reas on ab le ne ss of hi s si x- m on th pr is on se nt en ce be cau se we co nc lu de th at th e di st ric t co ur t, aft er co ns id eri ng th e 18 U.S.C. § 35 53 (a)

se nt en ci ng fact or s, di d no t ab us e it ’s di sc ret io n. See Uni te d St at es v. Cal la way , 76 2 F.3 d 75 4, 76 0- 61 (8 th Ci r. 20 1 4) (p res um in g reas on ab le ne ss of wit hi n- Gui de li ne s
se nt en ce).

The jud gm en t i s af

fir m ed

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

The Hon or ab le Lin da R. Rea de , Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e Nor th ern 1 Dis tri ct of I owa

. -2

-
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"20-1566: In Re PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES LLC [OPINION], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"pPUMqoEuOM\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/8-12-2021-20-1566-in-re-personalweb-technologies-llc-opinion-20-1566-opinion-8-12-2021_1818056\/\">20-1566: In Re PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES LLC [OPINION], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/8-12-2021-20-1566-in-re-personalweb-technologies-llc-opinion-20-1566-opinion-8-12-2021_1818056\/embed\/#?secret=pPUMqoEuOM\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“20-1566: In Re PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES LLC [OPINION], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"pPUMqoEuOM\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Opinions\/Orders posted: In Re PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES LLC [OPINION](pdf) Appeal Number: 20-1566 Origin: DCT Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
Editorial Note on Part 36
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 74 FR 23956, May 22, 2009, 77 FR 30411, May 23, 2012, 82 FR 25538, June 2, 2017, and corrected at 83 FR 4153, Jan. 30, 2018. Nomenclature changes to part 36 also appear at 83 FR 63587, Dec. 11, 2018, and 84 FR 4360, Feb. 15, 2019.

§ 36.142 Categories and apportionment procedures. ( a ) *Other Information Origination/Termination Equipment—Category 1.* This category includes the cost of other information origination/termination equipment not assigned to Category 2. The costs of other information origination/termination equipment are allocated pursuant to the factor that is used to allocate subcategory 1.3 Exchange Line C&WF.
( b ) *Customer Premises Equipment—Category 2.* This category includes the cost of Customer Premises Equipment that was detariffed pursuant to the Second Computer Inquiry decision. It shall be assigned to the state operations.
( c ) Effective July 1, 2001, through December 31, 2024, all study areas shall apportion costs in the categories, as specified in § 36.141(b), among the jurisdictions using the relative use measurements or factors, as specified in paragraph (a) of this section, for the twelve-month period ending December 31, 2000. Direct assignment of any category of Information Origination/Termination Equipment to the jurisdictions shall be updated annually.
[52 FR 17229, May 6, 1987, as amended at 66 FR 33206, June 21, 2001; 71 FR 65746, Nov. 9, 2006; 75 FR 30301, June 1, 2010; 76 FR 30841, May 27, 2011; 79 FR 36237, June 26, 2014]
No. 11-136.

#### Bagley et al. *v.*Blagojevich et al.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Bank of Florida Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Michael L. McMullan, President, Chief Executive
Officer and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                             |  |                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 2, 2009 |  |  |  | By:                         |  | /s/ Michael L. McMullan
|                       |  |  |  | Michael L. McMullan,       
|                       |  |  |  | Principal Executive Officer
§ 32.13 Accounts—general. ( a ) As a general rule, all accounts kept by reporting companies shall conform in numbers and titles to those prescribed herein. However, reporting companies may use different numbers for internal purposes when separate accounts (or subaccounts) maintained are consistent with the title and content of accounts and subaccounts prescribed in this system. ( 1 ) A company may subdivide any of the accounts prescribed. The titles of all such subaccounts shall refer by number or title to the controlling account.
( 2 ) A company may establish temporary or experimental accounts without prior notice to the Commission.
( b ) Exercise of the preceding options shall be allowed only if the integrity of the prescribed accounts is not impaired.
( c ) As of the date a company becomes subject to the system of accounts, the company is authorized to make any such subdivisions, reclassifications or consolidations of existing balances as are necessary to meet the requirements of this system of accounts.
( d ) Nothing contained in this part shall prohibit or excuse any company, receiver, or operating trustee of any carrier from subdividing the accounts hereby prescribed for the purpose of: ( 1 ) Complying with the requirements of the state commission(s) having jurisdiction; or
( 2 ) Securing the information required in the prescribed reports to such commission(s).
( e ) Where the use of subsidiary records is considered necessary in order to secure the information required in reports to any state commission, the company shall incorporate the following controls into their accounting system with respect to such subsidiary records: ( 1 ) Subsidiary records shall be reconciled to the company's general ledger or books of original entry, as appropriate.
( 2 ) The company shall adequately document the accounting procedures related to subsidiary records.
( 3 ) The subsidiary records shall be maintained at an adequate level of detail to satisfy state regulators.
[51 FR 43499, Dec. 2, 1986, as amended at 65 FR 16334, Mar. 28, 2000; 67 FR 5679, Feb. 6, 2002]
Exhibit 32.1



Section 1350

CERTIFICATION



The undersigned officer hereby certifies that,
to his knowledge, (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of COMFORCE Corporation for the quarter ended March 28, 2004 as to which this Certification is an exhibit fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and (2) the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of COMFORCE Corporation.



Signed May 11, 2004.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ John C. Fanning                 
|John C. Fanning,                    
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
H. R. 4647

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four

An Act

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey to the City of Imperial Beach,

California, approximately 1 acre of land in the Tijuana Slough National Wildlife

Refuge.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF LAND IN TIJUANA SLOUGH NATIONAL

WILDLIFE REFUGE.

(a) REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary of the Interior shall expeditiously convey to the City of Imperial Beach, California, without

compensation, all right, title, and interest of the United States

in and to approximately 1 acre of land in the Tijuana Slough

National Wildlife Refuge, as depicted on a United States Fish

and Wildlife Service map entitled ‘‘T-ball Field, Tijuana Slough

National Wildlife Refuge’’, dated June 1994, for use as a public

recreational area.

(b) REVERSIONARY INTEREST IN THE UNITED STATES.—Upon

any date on which any of the land in which right, title, and interest

is conveyed under subsection (a) ceases to be used by the City

of Imperial Beach, California, for public recreational purposes—

(1) all such right, title, and interest shall revert to the

Government of the United States; and

(2) such land shall be reincorporated into the Tijuana

Slough National Wildlife Refuge.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.