alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# iCollege Faculty Lead Cyber Seminars for Government Officials from Latin America

/ Published Sept. 19, 2014

Two of the iCollege's esteemed Cyber faculty provided a two-part cyber lecture

series for 40 students from Latin America at the William J. Perry Center for 

Hemispheric Defense Studies (CHDS) at the National Defense University as part 

of the "Perspectives of Homeland Security and Defense" course (PHSD) on 

September 16 & 17, 2014. The PHSD is a four-week course for senior executives 

from institutions in Latin America that deal with homeland security and 

defense.

Professor Gil Duvall, Engr., gave a presentation on "Cybersecurity and 

Cyberterrorism" which analyzed the difficult challenges of technical and 

policy considerations on a set of issues in detecting and deterring existing 

threats in the cyberspace and implementing effective safeguard measures.  This 

was followed on the second day by Professor John Saunders, Ph.D., with a 

presentation on "Industrial Control System and SCADA Vulnerabilities," which 

examined international communications and technology (ICT) issues essential to 

preserving a nation's critical infrastructures and key resources.

The PHSD course begins with a two-week distance learning phase followed by a 

two-week resident phase conducted at the William J. Perry Center in Washington 

DC. and in USNORTHCOM Headquarters in Colorado Springs, Colorado. The course 

permits participants to analyze and compare the nature and the scope of 

transnational perspectives on homeland security and defense; including 

considerations for border security, preservation of critical infrastructure, 

response to terrorism, interagency coordination, maritime and port security, 

nuclear plant safety, cyber crime, and continuity of government.                   Gil Duvall speaking at CHDS Questions about the college's Cyber Security program should be directed to the college's cyber chairperson, Dr. Jim Churbuck, at churbuckj@ndu.edu.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Advisory Council - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Fmx9pL88Rj\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/the-court\/advisory-council\/\">Advisory Council<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/the-court\/advisory-council\/embed\/#?secret=Fmx9pL88Rj\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Advisory Council” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"Fmx9pL88Rj\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"The Advisory Council for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit was established pursuant to 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 2077(b) to review, study, and make recommendations regarding the\u202fFederal Circuit Rules of Practice\u202fand\u202fInternal Operating Procedures\u202fof the court.\u00a0\u00a0Administrative Order 2021-11 (pdf) establishes the procedures and membership for the Advisory Council. The Advisory Council also serves as […]"}
No. 10-11021.

#### Murillo-Betancourt *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

                  Chase Credit Card Master Trust (the "Trust")

I, Patricia M. Garvey, a vice president of Chase Bank USA, National Association,
certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form
      8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
      periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of the Trust;

2.    Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
      does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
      a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
      circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of
      the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required
      to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and
      servicing agreement, or similar agreement, for inclusion in these reports
      is included in these reports;

4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer
      under the pooling and servicing agreement and based upon my knowledge and
      the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as
      disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under
      that agreement; and

5.    These reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
      servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the
      report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a
      review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for
      Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and
      servicing agreement that is included in these reports.


Date:    March 30, 2005

         /s/ Patricia M. Garvey
         -----------------------------
Name:    Patricia M. Garvey
Title:   Vice President
Company: Chase Bank USA, National Association
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.1932 Refunds. ( a ) Refunds shall promptly be made when— ( 1 ) A debt is waived or otherwise found not owing to the United States (unless expressly prohibited by statute or regulation); or
( 2 ) The employee's paying agency is directed by an administrative or judicial order to refund amounts deducted from his or her current pay.
( b ) Refunds do not bear interest unless required or permitted by law or contract.
VERMILION CLIFFS NATIONAL MONUMENT ROUTE DESIGNATIONS

LOCATION #: B2

“Wj007H"

Legend

Route Designation

Open to All Users (mitigating measures may apply)
Open to All Users for ATV Use Only
Open to All Users with Seasonal Restrictions

Open to All Users for Non-Motorized Use;
Mechanized Use Limits May Vary

Administrative Use Only (open to administrative
motorized uses and non-motorized public uses;
public mechanized use limits may vary)

Closed to All Motorized Use and Mechanized Use
(permanent closure as a route)

Undesignated Routes (outside jurisdiction i.e. private
land, other Federal land, State land, or routes to be
designated in future planning)

0 1 2
SET kilometers

is)

1

Land Status

Bureau of Land Management
| Native American Reservation
|) National Park Service

Private
a State or Arizona
HQ Monument Boundary
TTT Wilderness Boundary
mmr State Boundary

Note: Decisions in this document only apply to Bureau
of Land Management (BLM) lands in the Planning Area.

Bureau of Land Management
Arizona Strip District Office

Not all routes are labeled. Many smaller routes were not labeled due to overlap
problems. If you have questions on specific routes that you cannot answer by
viewing these maps, you can either contact the BLM or review the GIS data.

This product may not meet BLM standards for accuracy and content. Different
data sources and input scales may cause some misalignment of data layers,

V1024D_

LOCATION MAP

|_| Vermition ciifs

National Monument

Universal Transverse Mercator
North American 1983

1:24,000

Arizona Strip GIS Team

Jan 28, 2008
No. 11-9493.

#### Lomax *v.*City of Miami Police Department et al .

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 54.1524 Disaster preparation and response measures; Disaster Information Reporting System. ( a ) Each recipient of support under § 54.1504(b) or § 54.1516 shall maintain a Disaster Preparation and Response Plan document approved by the Bureau for Stage 2 of the Uniendo a Puerto Rico Fund or Connect USVI Fund, as applicable, that describes and commits to the methods and procedures that it will use, during the period in which it receives support under § 54.1516 or § 54.1504(b), to prepare for and respond to disasters in the Territories, including detailed descriptions of methods and processes to strengthen infrastructure; to ensure network diversity; to ensure backup power; to monitor its network; and to prepare for emergencies. If an eligible recipient has not previously submitted a Disaster Preparation and Response Plan that was approved by the Bureau prior to the authorization to receive fixed or mobile support, as applicable, the eligible recipient must submit a Disaster Preparation and Response Plan for Bureau approval by July 1, 2023. Phase-down support shall be suspended if a recipient fails to submit a Disaster Preparation and Response Plan by the requisite deadline or fails to receive approval from the Bureau.
( b ) Each recipient of support under § 54.1504(b) or § 54.1516 shall maintain the Disaster Preparation and Response Plan approved by the Bureau for Stage 2 of each funding mechanism that completely and thoroughly address the criteria enumerated in paragraph (a) of this section. Recipients shall materially comply with the representations in the document and shall amend their Disaster Preparation and Response Plan following any material change(s) to internal processes and responsibilities and provide the updated Disaster Preparation and Response Plan to the Bureau within 10 business days following the material change(s).
( c ) Each recipient of support under § 54.1504(b) or § 54.1516 shall perform mandatory Disaster Information Reporting System reporting.
( d ) A recipient's failure to comply with the requirements of this section may result in the withholding of transitional or phase-down support until the support recipient has cured deficiencies identified by the Bureau.
[88 FR 29000, May 5, 2023]
#### § 10.340 Digital television transmission towers retransmission capability.

Licensees and permittees of noncommercial educational broadcast television stations (NCE) or public broadcast television stations (to the extent such stations fall within the scope of those terms as defined in section 397(6) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 397(6))) are required to install on, or as part of, any broadcast television digital signal transmitter, equipment to enable the distribution of geographically targeted alerts by commercial mobile service providers that have elected to transmit WEA alerts. Such equipment and technologies must have the capability of allowing licensees and permittees of NCE and public broadcast television stations to receive WEA alerts from the Alert Gateway over an alternate, secure interface and then to transmit such WEA alerts to CMS Provider Gateways of participating CMS providers. This equipment must be installed no later than eighteen months from the date of receipt of funding permitted under section 606(b) of the WARN Act or 18 months from the effective date of these rules, whichever is later.

[78 FR 16808, Mar. 19, 2013]
#### § 22.946 Construction period for Unserved Area authorizations.

The construction period applicable to new or modified Cellular facilities for which an authorization is granted pursuant to the Unserved Area process is one year, beginning on the date the authorization is granted. To satisfy this requirement, a Cellular system must be providing service to mobile stations operated by subscribers and roamers. The licensee must notify the FCC (FCC Form 601) after the requirements of this section are met. *See* § 1.946 of this chapter. *See also* § 22.949.

[79 FR 72151, Dec. 5, 2014]
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 151 (Monday, August 7, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44618-44621]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6724]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 60-50)


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notificaiton. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/ADM, (703) 604-
6575.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 60-50 with attached transmittal, policy 
justificaiton, and Sensitivity of Technology.

    Dated: August 1, 2006.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 44619]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07AU06.001


[[Page 44620]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07AU06.002


[[Page 44621]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07AU06.003

[FR Doc. 06-6724 Filed 8-4-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
058P16

#### In the Matter of Q.C.R. and L.Q.W.

Respondent-Mother’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-504)

Denied
§ 5.107 Transmitter control requirements. Each licensee shall be responsible for maintaining control of the transmitter authorized under its station authorization, including the ability to terminate transmissions should interference occur. ( a ) *Conventional experimental radio stations.* The licensee shall ensure that transmissions are in conformance with the operating characteristics prescribed in the station authorization and that the station is operated only by persons duly authorized by the licensee.
( b ) *Program experimental radio stations.* The licensee shall ensure that transmissions are in conformance with the requirements in subpart E of this part and that the station is operated only by persons duly authorized by the licensee.
( c ) *Medical testing experimental radio stations.* The licensee shall ensure that transmissions are in conformance with the requirements in subpart F of this part and that the station is operated only by persons duly authorized by the licensee.
( d ) *Compliance testing experimental radio stations.* The licensee shall ensure that transmissions are in conformance with the requirements in subpart G of this part and that the station is operated only by persons duly authorized by the licensee.
( e ) *Broadcast experimental stations.* Except where unattended operation is specifically permitted, the licensee of each station authorized under the provisions of this part shall designate a person or persons to activate and control its transmitter. At the discretion of the station licensee, persons so designated may be employed for other duties and for operation of other transmitting stations if such other duties will not interfere with the proper operation of the station transmission systems.
( f ) *Spectrum Horizons experimental radio licenses.* The licensee shall ensure that transmissions are in conformance with the requirements in subpart I of this part and that the station is operated only by persons duly authorized by the licensee.
[78 FR 25162, Apr. 29, 2013, as amended at 84 FR 25690, June 4, 2019]
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"22-1987: ANALOG DEVICES, INC. v. XILINX, INC. [ORDER], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"7sgGiCQuUn\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/12-13-2022-22-1987-analog-devices-inc-v-xilinx-inc-order-22-1987-order-12-13-2022_2047076\/\">22-1987: ANALOG DEVICES, INC. v. XILINX, INC. [ORDER], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/12-13-2022-22-1987-analog-devices-inc-v-xilinx-inc-order-22-1987-order-12-13-2022_2047076\/embed\/#?secret=7sgGiCQuUn\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“22-1987: ANALOG DEVICES, INC. v. XILINX, INC. [ORDER], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"7sgGiCQuUn\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"ORDER Posted: ANALOG DEVICES, INC. v. XILINX, INC. [ORDER](pdf) Appeal Number: 22-1987 Origin: PTO Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
No. D-2653.

#### In re Disbarment of Uhl.

[For earlier order herein, see *ante,*p. 934.]

Disbarment entered.
19 

20 

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2010-12-23T16:22:03-0500
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
EXHIBIT  99.1
                                  HIV-VAC, INC.
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of HIV-VAC, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB/A for the period ending June 30, 2001, as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Kevin  Murray,  the
Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,  hereby certify,  pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



                                                     /s/ Kevin Murray
                                                     ----------------
                                                     President and CEO
October 22, 2002






                                       19
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Circuit Mediation Office Statistics

2015 Calendar Year

(January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015)

Appeals settled: 9

• Patent: 8

• Non-patent: 1

Appeals not settled; mediation terminated: 15

• Patent: 14

• Non-patent: 1

Success rate - overall (of appeals selected for mediation): 38%

• Patent: 36%

• Non-patent: 50%
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 2.402 Control of distress traffic.

The control of distress traffic is the responsibility of the mobile station in distress or of the mobile station which, by the application of the provisions of § 2.403, has sent the distress call. These stations may, however, delegate the control of the distress traffic to another station.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial 
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for Willowbridge Strategic Trust
                    and is qualified in its entirety by reference
                    to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>          

<CIK>               0001005006
<NAME>              Willowbridge Strategic Trust

<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1996

<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-1-1996

<PERIOD-END>                    Dec-31-1996

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-Mos

<CASH>                          27,465,535

<SECURITIES>                    354,215

<RECEIVABLES>                   4,224

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                27,823,974

<PP&E>                          0

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  27,823,974

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           843,806

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      26,980,168

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    27,823,974

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                4,148,504

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                1,858,320

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    2,290,184

<EPS-PRIMARY>                   103.47

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0


</TABLE>