alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-215

_____________________________

GRIFFIN BILLINGSLEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Angela C. Dempsey, Judge.

April 6, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, ROBERTS, and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Joseph C. Bodiford and Gannon M. Coens of Bodiford Law, P.A., 

Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Steven E. Woods, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
#### § 25.206 Station identification.

The requirement to transmit station identification is waived for all radio stations licensed under this part with the exception of earth stations subject to the requirements of § 25.281.

[79 FR 8322, Feb. 12, 2014]
Editorial Note on Part 36
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 74 FR 23956, May 22, 2009, 77 FR 30411, May 23, 2012, 82 FR 25538, June 2, 2017, and corrected at 83 FR 4153, Jan. 30, 2018. Nomenclature changes to part 36 also appear at 83 FR 63587, Dec. 11, 2018, and 84 FR 4360, Feb. 15, 2019.

§ 36.222 Nonoperating income and expenses—Account 7300. ( a ) Only allowance for funds used during construction, and charitable, social and community welfare contributions are considered in this account for separations purposes.
( b ) Subsidiary record categories should be maintained for this account that include identification of amounts made to the account for ( 1 ) credits representing allowance for funds used during construction and
( 2 ) contributions for charitable, social or community welfare purposes, employee activities, membership dues and fees in service clubs, community welfare association and similar organizations.
( c ) The portion reflecting allowance for funds used during construction is apportioned on the basis of the cost of Telecommunications Plant Under Construction—Account 2003. The portion reflecting costs for social and community welfare contributions and fees is apportioned on the basis of the apportionment of corporate operations expenses.
[52 FR 17229, May 6, 1987, as amended at 60 FR 12138, Mar. 6, 1995]
§ 51.223 Application of additional requirements. ( a ) A state may not impose the obligations set forth in section 251(c) of the Act on a LEC that is not classified as an incumbent LEC as defined in section 251(h)(1) of the Act, unless the Commission issues an order declaring that such LECs or classes or categories of LECs should be treated as incumbent LECs.
( b ) A state commission, or any other interested party, may request that the Commission issue an order declaring that a particular LEC be treated as an incumbent LEC, or that a class or category of LECs be treated as incumbent LECs, pursuant to section 251(h)(2) of the Act.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 1:22-cv-24066-KMM

GRACE, INC., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CITY OF MIAMI,

Defendant.

/

PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE REGARDING TIME FOR ARGUMENT

AT PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HEARING

Pursuant to the Court’s Order Setting Hearing (ECF 38), Plaintiffs give notice that they 

anticipate they will need a total of two hours and thirty minutes for argument time to present 

their case at the hearing on March 29, 2023.

As stated in the Request for Hearing in their Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ECF 26 at 

37) and pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(b)(2), Plaintiffs did not request to and will not call witnesses,

and will rely on the papers attached to their Motion to support their case.

Although the City likewise did not request an evidentiary hearing in their Response to the 

Motion pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(b)(2), should the City call witnesses, Plaintiffs respectfully 

request that any time spent cross-examining them not count against their argument time.

Respectfully submitted this 22nd day of March, 2023,

/s/ Nicholas L.V. Warren

Nicholas L.V. Warren (FBN 1019018)

ACLU Foundation of Florida, Inc.

336 East College Avenue, Suite 203

Tallahassee, FL 32301

(786) 363-1769

nwarren@aclufl.org

Neil A. Steiner*

Dechert LLP

aree Bryant Park

1095 Avenue of the Americas

New York, NY 10036

(212) 698-3822

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 41 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/22/2023 Page 1 of 2
Daniel B. Tilley (FBN 102882)

Caroline A. McNamara (FBN 1038312)

ACLU Foundation of Florida, Inc.

4343 West Flagler Street, Suite 400

Miami, FL 33134

(786) 363-2714

dtilley@aclufl.org

cmcnamara@aclufl.org

neil.steiner@dechert.com

Christopher J. Merken*

Jocelyn Kirsch*

Dechert LLP

Cira Centre

2929 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19104

(215) 994-2380

christopher.merken@dechert.com

jocelyn.kirsch@dechert.com

* Admitted pro hac vice

Counsel for Plaintiffs

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 41 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/22/2023 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 11

   STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE - (UNAUDITED)

                                               For the Three Months Ended
                                                      December 31,
                                             -------------------------------
(dollars in thousands except per
      share amounts)                              2003             2002
----------------------------------------     -------------    --------------
Net earnings (loss)                               $ (292)           $ 560

Effect of conversion of preferred                    101              100
securities

Diluted earnings (loss)                             (191)             660

Weighted average common shares
outstanding                                    3,012,434        3,012,434
Effect of conversion of preferred
securities (1)                                 1,371,429        1,371,429
Common stock equivalents due to
dilutive effect of stock options (1)              39,601           24,254

Total weighted average common
shares and common share
equivalents outstanding (1)                    4,423,464        4,408,117
Basic earnings (loss) per common
share                                             $(0.10)           $0.19
Diluted earnings (loss) per common
share                                             $(0.10)           $0.15
(1) Effect of conversion of preferred securities and dilutive effect of stock
options are not considered in the calculation of earnings per share for the
three months ended December 31, 2003 because the impact is antidilutive.
V

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4583

To clear certain impediments to the licensing of a vessel for employment

in coastwise trade and fisheries of the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 15, 1994

Mr. GILCHREST introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To clear certain impediments to the licensing of a vessel

for employment in coastwise trade and fisheries of the

United States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, notwithstanding sections 12105, 12106, 12107, and

4 12108 of title 46, United States Code, and section 27 of

5 the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 833),

6 as applicable on the date of this Act, the secretary of the

7 department in which the Coast Guard is operating may

8 issue a certificate of documentation for the following ves9 sel: PANDION (Maryland certification number 6589D).

Æ
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Sitemap - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"qoqCMa3sYk\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/sitemap\/\">Sitemap<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/sitemap\/embed\/#?secret=qoqCMa3sYk\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Sitemap” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"qoqCMa3sYk\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"21-2311: SOCLEAN, INC. v. SUNSET HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, INC. [OPINION], Precedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"I7UVXup2XT\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/11-09-2022-21-2311-soclean-inc-v-sunset-healthcare-solutions-inc-opinion-21-2311-opinion-11-9-2022_2031039\/\">21-2311: SOCLEAN, INC. v. SUNSET HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, INC. [OPINION], Precedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/11-09-2022-21-2311-soclean-inc-v-sunset-healthcare-solutions-inc-opinion-21-2311-opinion-11-9-2022_2031039\/embed\/#?secret=I7UVXup2XT\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“21-2311: SOCLEAN, INC. v. SUNSET HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, INC. [OPINION], Precedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"I7UVXup2XT\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"OPINION Posted: SOCLEAN, INC. v. SUNSET HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, INC. [OPINION](pdf) Appeal Number: 21-2311 Origin: DCT Precedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with this Quarterly Report of HIV-VAC Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the year period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin Murray, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the
         period ending December 31, 2003, fairly presents, in all material
         respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HIV-VAC
         Inc.

Dated: August 31, 2010

/s/ Kevin Murray
Kevin Murray
Chief Financial Officer
§ 25.280 Inclined orbit operations. ( a ) Satellite operators may commence operation in inclined orbit mode without obtaining prior Commission authorization provided that the Commission is notified by letter within 30 days after the last north-south station keeping maneuver. The notification shall include: ( 1 ) The operator's name;
( 2 ) The date of commencement of inclined orbit operation;
( 3 ) The initial inclination;
( 4 ) The rate of change in inclination per year; and
( 5 ) The expected end-of-life of the satellite accounting for inclined orbit operation, and the maneuvers specified under § 25.283 of the Commission's rules.
( b ) Licensees operating in inclined-orbit are required to: ( 1 ) Periodically correct the satellite attitude to achieve a stationary spacecraft antenna pattern on the surface of the Earth and centered on the satellite's designated service area;
( 2 ) Control all electrical interference to adjacent satellites, as a result of operating in an inclined orbit, to levels not to exceed that which would be caused by the satellite operating without an inclined orbit;
( 3 ) Not claim protection in excess of the protection that would be received by the satellite network operating without an inclined orbit; and
( 4 ) Continue to maintain the space station at the authorized longitude orbital location in the geostationary satellite arc with the appropriate east-west station-keeping tolerance.
[69 FR 54587, Sept. 9, 2004]
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 11-801 

________________________________________________________________________ 

ENERGY 

Uranium for Nuclear Reactor 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and OTHER GOVERNMENTS 

Signed at Vienna July 13, 29, and 

August 1, 2011 

with 

Annexes 
 

NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 

 MULTILATERAL 

 Energy: Uranium for Nuclear Reactor 

 Agreement signed at Vienna July 13, 29, and 

 August 1, 2011; 

 Entered into force August 1, 2011. 

 With annexes.
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4581 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

<DOC>

        H.R.4581

                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
 the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  four


                                 An Act


 
 To provide for the imposition of temporary fees in connection with the 
  handling of complaints of violations of the Perishable Agricultural 
                         Commodities Act, 1930.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. FILING AND HANDLING FEES FOR COMPLAINTS OF VIOLATIONS OF 
PERISHABLE AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES ACT, 1930.
    (a) Temporary Filing Fee Required.--During fiscal years 1995 and 
1996, the Secretary of Agriculture shall require persons who submit 
petitions to the Secretary under section 6(a) of the Perishable 
Agricultural Commodities Act, 1930 (7 U.S.C. 499f(a)), alleging a 
violation of section 2 of such Act (7 U.S.C. 499b), to include a filing 
fee of $60 per petition.
    (b) Temporary Handling Fee Required.--During fiscal years 1995 and 
1996, if the Secretary determines under section 6(a) of the Perishable 
Agricultural Commodities Act, 1930 (7 U.S.C. 499f(a)), that the facts 
contained in a petition described in such section warrant further 
action, the person or persons submitting the petition shall submit to 
the Secretary a handling fee of $300. The Secretary may not forward a 
copy of the complaint to the commission merchant, dealer, or broker 
involved until after the Secretary receives the required handling fee. 
In determining the amount of damages incurred by an injured person or 
persons preparatory to issuing a reparation order under section 7 of 
such Act (7 U.S.C. 499g), the Secretary shall include the amount of any 
handling fee paid by the injured person or persons under this 
subsection.
    (c) Deposit of Fees.--The Secretary shall deposit fees submitted 
under this section into the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act 
Fund.







                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.







                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.`
#### § 27.701 698-746 MHz bands subject to competitive bidding.

Mutually exclusive initial applications for licenses in the 698-746 MHz band are subject to competitive bidding. The general competitive bidding procedures set forth in part 1, subpart Q of this chapter will apply unless otherwise provided in this subpart.

[67 FR 45374, July 9, 2002]
No. 11-9669.

#### Perkins *v.*Cooper, Attorney General of Tennessee.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on July 6, 2006, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Digital Spirit, Berlin, Germany; Horizon Wimba, New York, NY; Respondus, Redmon, WA; and Sun Microsystems, inc., Mountain View, CA have been added as parties to this venture. Also, Brownstone Research Group, Rome, GA has withdrawn as a party to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On April 7, 2000, IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on September 13, 2000 (65 FR 55283).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 10, 2006. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on May 10, 2006 (71 FR 27279).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 06-6780 Filed 8-8-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M