alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"2021-1777: Boston Scientific v. Nevro Corp. - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Ar9RnnhdbH\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/03-08-2022-2021-1777-boston-scientific-v-nevro-corp-audio-uploaded\/\">2021-1777: Boston Scientific v. Nevro Corp.<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/03-08-2022-2021-1777-boston-scientific-v-nevro-corp-audio-uploaded\/embed\/#?secret=Ar9RnnhdbH\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“2021-1777: Boston Scientific v. Nevro Corp.” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"Ar9RnnhdbH\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Oral argument audio posted: Boston Scientific v. Nevro Corp. (mp3) Appeal Number: 2021-1777 To listen to more oral argument recordings, follow this link: Listen To Oral Arguments."}
No. 11-8872.

#### Jones *v.*Bowersox, Superintendent, South Central Correctional Facility.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Civ. No. 2134.

Second Appellate District.

February 2, 1918.]

#### MAX LOUIS WINKLER et al., Respondents, v. SIERRA PARK COMPANY (a Corporation), et al., Appellants.

Appeal—Failure to File Brief or Appear at Oral Argument— Affirmance of Judgment and Order.—The judgment and order denying a new trial are affirmed on this appeal, no brief having been filed on behalf of appellants and no appearance made by them at the time set for oral argument.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. Curtis D. Wilbur, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

John W. Luter, and Randall & Bartlett, for Appellants.

Porter & Sutton, for Respondents.

THE COURT.

The appeal in this case purports to have been taken from the judgment entered in favor of the plaintiffs and from an order denying the motion of defendants for a new trial. The transcript of the record was filed in this court on July 3, 1916. Thereafter the appeal, on motion duly made, was dismissed as to the Janss Company. No brief has been filed on behalf of appellants and no appearance was made by the appealing parties at the time set for *120' oral argument. We are of the opinion that the appeal taken herein is frivolous and without merit.

The judgment- and order are affirmed. In addition to the costs incurred by them, the respondents shall have and recover from appellants the sum of $75 as damages.
### 10 Record of Discussion

Docket No. FAA-2013-0546 D irectorate Identifier: - AD

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder,

manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, R AA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)?

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED



### The Boeing

Company Randy Elliot 01/28/2013 Other. List below.

Other/Additional Information: 

### Discussion on the number of Grp I, II, III and IV airplanes which

are still active.
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4571

AN ACT

To designate the United States Post Office building located

at 103–104 Estate Richmond in Saint Croix, Virgin Islands, as the ‘‘Wilbert Armstrong Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4571 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The United States Post Office building located at

3 103–104 Estate Richmond in Saint Croix, Virgin Islands,

4 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Wilbert Armstrong

5 Post Office’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the building

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the Wilbert Armstrong Post Office.

Passed the House of Representatives September 19,

1994.

Attest:

Clerk.

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4571

AN ACT

To designate the United States Post Office building

Post Office’’.Croix, Virgin Islands, as the ‘‘Wilbert Armstronglocated at 103–104 Estate Richmond in Saint
374P13-5

#### State v. Marvin Wade Millsaps

1. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion for Rule 15 Discretionary Review

1. Dismissed

2. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion for Exculpatory Evidence Information Record

2. Dismissed

Ervin, J.,

recused
I. Applicant Information

First Name Middle Name 

Last Name Suffix

Organization Job Title 

II. Supervisor Information

Name Organization 

Title Grade/Rank 

Email 

Address 

Telephone/Ext 

III. Eligibility Verification (To be completed by supervisor)

The applicant named above is applying for admission to National Defense University,

College of Information and Cyberspace (CIC). CIC priorities applicants whose work role(s)

are included under the DoD Cyber Workforce Framework, to include personnel who

build, acquire, secure, operate, defend, manage, and protect DoD and U.S. cyberspace

resources; conduct related intelligence activities; enable future operations; and project

power in or through cyberspace.

1. Does the applicant currently complete work role(s) as describe above:

Yes No

Employment Verification/Recommendation Form

College of Information and Cyberspace 

National Defense University

Fort Lesley J. McNair, Washington D.C. 20319-5066
2. Is the applicant pursuing this education for future work roles(s) described above:

Yes No

3. Is the applicant’s current pay grade/rank equivalent to GS/GM-13, E-7, CW3 or O-4 or above:

Yes No

4. If the answer is yes to #3, please select the applicant’s current grade/rank:

GS/GM-13 or above CW3 or above

E-7 or above O-4 or above

5. If your answer is no to #3, please complete the section below to recommend a waiver of the 

grade/rank requirement.

a. Please provide the applicant’s grade/rank:

b. Describe the current level of responsibility (senior level management, surperisory, etc):

c. Provide a brief description of the core responsibilities of the applicant’s position (or 

attach a description):
6. Education: The applicant has earned at least a bachelor’s degree from a regionally accredited 

institution:

No/Uncertain

IV. Recommendation (to be completed by supervisor)

1. How long have you supervised the applicant?

2. Please assess the applicant’s leadership potential.

3. Please assess the applicant’s academic ability including their oral and written communication 

skills and motivation to complete an intensive graduate-level program.

Yes
4. Please provide your impression of the applicant’s commitment to lead and advise

Information Age national security institutions and advance global security within the

cyberspace domain

5. Please assess the overall promise of the applicant (select one).

Below 

Average 

Average Good Superior Exceptional Unknown

V. Certification (to be completed by Supervisor)

Signature Date
§ 32.4341 Net deferred tax liability adjustments. ( a ) This account shall include the portion of deferred income tax charges and credits pertaining to Account 32.4361, Deferred tax regulatory adjustments—net.
( b ) This account shall be used to record adjustments to the accumulated deferred tax liabilities recorded in Accounts 4100 and 4340 for: ( 1 ) Tax effects of temporary differences accounted for under the flow-through method or treated as permanent differences.
( 2 ) Reclassification attributable to changes in tax rates (Federal, state and local). As tax rates increase or decrease, the offsetting debit or credit will be recorded in Account 4361 as required by paragraph (a) of this section.
( 3 ) The tax effects of carryforward net operating losses and carryforward investment tax credits expected to reduce future taxes payable that are reported in published financial statements.
( 4 ) Reversals of the tax effects of carryforward net operating losses and carryforward investment tax credits previously recorded in this account at the time they become recognized as reductions in current taxable income and current taxes payable on tax returns.
( c ) This account shall be exempt from the vintage year detail record requirements of § 32.22(e)(2).
[59 FR 9419, Feb. 28, 1994, as amended at 67 FR 5690, Feb. 6, 2002]
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            College of Information and Cyberspace
                    National Defense University
                CIC
        Search
                    Search CIC:
                        Search
                Search CIC:
                    Search
    Home

    About 
        Mission & Vision

    Faculty & Staff

    Fact Sheet

    Alumni

    Internships

    FAQ

    Admissions 
        Eligibility Requirements

    Admissions Calendar

    Application Instructions

    Apply Online

    International Students

    Academics 
        Graduate Catalog

    M.S. in Strategic Information and Cyberspace Studies
        
        JPME Master's Degree

    Cyber Workforce Master's Degree (Part Time)

    Leadership Development Programs

    Graduate Certificates

    Academic Partners

    Current Students 
        JPME II  Incoming Students

    LDP Incoming Students

    Student Registration

    Bring Your Own Device

    IA Compliance

    Completion Procedures / Order Transcripts

    Student Services and Resources

    Events
    
        Cyber Beacon

    Cyber PME Colloquium

    Hopper Award

    Lecture Series

    CYBERCOM Symposium

    NEWS

    UC2
    
        About

    Events

    Work With Us

    Center for Cybersecurity
    
        About

    Cybersecurity Center POC

    Cybersecurity Supporting Faculty

    CAE-CDE CISO Certificate Program

    Cybersecurity Trending News

    Cyber Labs
        
        Ethical Hacking

    Critical Infrastructure - SCADA

    Cyber Exercises
        
        Tabletop Exercise

    Cyber Competitions

    Cyber Resources and Awareness

    Stakeholder / Industry Advisory Council

    Contact 
        Contact Us

    Directions

    Access to Ft. McNair

    Map of Ft. McNair  Home
  NEWS
  News & Announcements
 News & Announcements Download
 Details
 Share
 News
 Cyber Beacon 2020
 Cyber Beacon 2020 was a huge success, featuring speakers from across the broader cyber community including "The Dark Tangent" Jeff Moss. See the event page here: https://cic.ndu.edu/cyberbeacon/
 SHARE
 PRINT
 National Defense University


College of Information and Cyberspace

300 Fifth Ave., Bldg. 62
Fort Lesley J. McNair
Washington, DC 20319-5066

202-685-6300
                    Stay Connected
                
                
                DOD Privacy & Security
 DOD Links Disclaimer
 DOD Social Media Policy
 DOD Web Policy
 FOIA
 NDU System of Records Notice
 NDU Privacy & Security Notice
 No FEAR Act
 Open GOV
 Plain Writing Act
 Section 508
 Small Business Act
 USA.gov
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
exv10w48



 






Exhibit 10.48




SUMMARY OF INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

As of March 2007




     The intent of the incentive compensation plan is to align management and shareholder interests
and to provide incentives for management to increase shareholder value, make sound judgments on
allocation of capital and carry out accretive transactions.



     The amount of the cash bonuses payable under the incentive compensation plan, if any, will be
based solely upon the return on shareholders’ equity (“ROE”), defined as (i) the sum of (A) the
Company’s GAAP net income per share (1), and (B) transaction accretion/dilution per
share, divided by (ii) per share book value at the beginning of the year (2). ROE will
be expressed as a percentage.



     Under the incentive compensation plan, no payout will occur unless a minimum ROE of 5% has
been met, in which case executive officers would receive a bonus equal to 25% of salary. The amount
of cash bonuses to be paid will be based on a sliding scale and will increase as the Company’s ROE
increases beyond the minimum threshold. If the modified ROE is 15%, executive officers will earn a
cash bonus equal to 100% of salary. Bonuses for executive officers will increase in increments of
20% of salary for each additional 1% increase in ROE above 15%. For all other employees, the cash
bonuses are subject to a maximum bonus.



     Cash bonuses earned under the incentive compensation plan will be paid early in the year
following performance after financial results for the year have been determined.





 




			
	(1)	 	The Compensation Committee may adjust GAAP net income per share
to exclude extraordinary items and changes in accounting treatment as it deems
appropriate.
	 
	(2)	 	Excludes the deferred tax asset.
#### ROBERT E. KING and wife, JO ANN O’NEAL v. MICHAEL S. BRYANT, M.D., and VILLAGE SURGICAL ASSOCIATES, P.A.

From Cumberland County

No. 294PA14

ORDER

On 21 August 2015, this Court certified this case to the trial court for additional findings of fact as to “[w]hether a physician-patient relationship existed at the time Mr. King signed the arbitration agreement.” On 6 November 2015, the trial court entered additional findings of fact.

On 22 February 2016, this Court ordered the parties to submit supplemental briefs addressing the effect, if any, of the trial court’s additional findings of fact on the proceedings in this case. Appellants and Appellees submitted supplemental briefs on 21 March 2016 and 18 April 2016, respectively.

The Court, on its own motion, now orders that this case be set for oral argument.

By order of the Court in Conference, this 9th day of June, 2016.

s/Ervin. J.

For the Court

WITNESS my hand and the seal of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, this the 10th day of June, 2016.

J. BRYAN BOYD Clerk, Supreme Court of North Carolina

s/M.C. Hacknev Assistant Clerk, Supreme Court of North Carolina
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report MIV Therapeutics, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended November 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Alan P. Lindsay, as President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.



/s/ Alan P. Lindsay
--------------------------
Alan P. Lindsay
President and CEO
January 14, 2006
May 23, 2012

No. 10-1545.

#### Demiraj et al. *v.*Holder, Attorney General.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 46.1.
No. 10-10849.

#### Gold *v.*Schuette.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Mendocino County Resource Advisory Committee will meet August 18, 2006 (RAC) in Willits, California. Agenda items to be covered include: (1) Approval of minutes, (2) Handout Discussion,  (3) Public Comment, (4) Financial Report,  (5) Sub-committees, (6) Matters before the group, (7) Discussion—approval of projects, (8) Next agenda and meeting date. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on August 18, 2006, from 9 a.m. until 12 noon.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Mendocino County Museum, located at 400 E. Commercial St., Willits, California.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Roberta Hurt, Committee Coordinator, USDA, Mendocino National Forest, Covelo Ranger District, 78150 Covelo Road, Covelo, CA 95428. (707) 983-8503; E-mail                         *rhurt@fs.fed.us.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public. Persons who wish to bring matters to the attention of the Committee may file written statements with the Committee staff by August 12, 2006. Public comment will have the opportunity to address the committee at the meeting.

Dated: August 6, 2006.

Blaine Baker,

Designated Federal Official.

[FR Doc. 06-6892 Filed 8-11-06; 8:45am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
791 A.2d 218

#### CHARLES SURBER, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF BLANCHE LANG, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TED LANG AND DORIS LANG, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

January 17, 2002.

This matter having come before the Court on an appeal as of right pursuant to *Rule*2:2-1(a)(1), and the Court having determined that the matter does not present a substantial constitutional question within the meaning of the *Rule*or applicable caselaw;

It is ORDERED that the within appeal is dismissed.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Unrepresented Parties - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"lEX7b8TsUF\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/information-for\/unrepresented-parties\/\">Unrepresented Parties<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/information-for\/unrepresented-parties\/embed\/#?secret=lEX7b8TsUF\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Unrepresented Parties” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"lEX7b8TsUF\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Individuals are not required to have legal representation and may choose to represent themselves in the Federal Circuit.\u00a0 The Clerk’s Office has prepared a\u00a0Guide for Unrepresented Parties\u00a0to explain the various processes and resources available to unrepresented parties. Register for Electronic Filing and Service Unrepresented parties can\u00a0register for electronic filing\u00a0to file and receive documents.\u00a0 Parties not […]"}
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7482

GARY E. WHETZEL, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GEORGE TRENT, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-49-2) Submitted: January 12, 1999 Decided: February 17, 1999 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gary E. Whetzel, Appellant Pro Se. Dawn Ellen Warfield, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Gary E. Whetzel appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Whetzel v. Trent , No. CA-97-49-2(N.D.W. Va. Sept. 17, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED