alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 27.10 Regulatory status. The following rules apply concerning the regulatory status in the frequency bands specified in § 27.5. ( a ) *Single authorization.* Authorization will be granted to provide any or a combination of the following services in a single license: common carrier, non-common carrier, private internal communications, and broadcast services. A licensee may render any kind of communications service consistent with the regulatory status in its license and with the Commission's rules applicable to that service. An applicant or licensee may submit a petition at any time requesting clarification of the regulatory status for which authorization is required to provide a specific communications service.
( b ) *Designation of regulatory status in initial application.* An applicant shall specify in its initial application if it is requesting authorization to provide common carrier, non-common carrier, private internal communications, or broadcast services, or a combination thereof.
( c ) *Amendment of pending applications.* The following rules apply to amendments of a pending application. ( 1 ) Any pending application may be amended to: ( i ) Change the carrier regulatory status requested, or
( ii ) Add to the pending request in order to obtain common carrier, non-common carrier, private internal communications, or broadcast services status, or a combination thereof, in a single license.
( 2 ) Amendments to change, or add to, the carrier regulatory status in a pending application are minor amendments filed under § 1.927 of this chapter.
( d ) *Modification of license.* The following rules apply to amendments of a license. ( 1 ) A licensee may modify a license to: ( i ) Change the regulatory status authorized, or
( ii ) Add to the status authorized in order to obtain a combination of services of different regulatory status in a single license.
( 2 ) Applications to change, or add to, the carrier status in a license are modifications not requiring prior Commission authorization. The licensee must notify the Commission within 30 days of the change. If the change results in the discontinuance, reduction, or impairment of an existing service, the licensee is subject to the provisions of § 27.66.
[65 FR 3146, Jan. 20, 2000, as amended at 65 FR 17602, Apr. 4, 2000; 67 FR 5510, Feb. 6, 2002; 67 FR 41854, June 20, 2002; 68 FR 66286, Nov. 25, 2003; 72 FR 27709, May 16, 2007]
§ 22.880 Information exchange. ( a ) *Prior notification.* Public safety/CII licensees may notify a commercial aviation air-ground system licensee that they wish to receive prior notification of the activation or modification of a commercial aviation air-ground system ground station site in their area. Thereafter, the commercial aviation air-ground system licensee must provide the following information to the public safety/CII licensee at least 10 business days before a new ground station is activated or an existing ground station is modified: ( 1 ) Location;
( 2 ) Effective radiated power;
( 3 ) Antenna manufacturer, model number, height above ground level and up tilt angle, as installed;
( 4 ) Channels available for use.
( b ) *Purpose of prior notification.* The prior notification of ground station activation or modification is for informational purposes only: public safety/CII licensees are not afforded the right to accept or reject the activation of a proposed ground station or to unilaterally require changes in its operating parameters. The principal purposes of prior notification are to: ( 1 ) Allow a public safety licensee to advise the commercial aviation air-ground system licensee whether it believes a proposed ground station will generate unacceptable interference;
( 2 ) Permit commercial aviation air-ground system licensee(s) to make voluntary changes in ground station parameters when a public safety licensee alerts them to possible interference; and
( 3 ) Rapidly identify the source if interference is encountered when the ground station is activated.
[70 FR 19312, Apr. 13, 2005]
§ 54.1523 Spending plans for recipients of legacy frozen phase-down support. ( a ) *Spending plan submissions for phase-down support recipients.* By July 1, 2023, recipients of support under § 54.1504(b) shall submit a spending plan for its use of that support for redundancy, resiliency, and maintenance measures to the Bureau for approval. Phase-down support shall be suspended if a recipient fails to submit a spending plan by the requisite deadline or fails to receive approval from the Bureau. Recipients of support must submit an updated spending plan if the details in their spending plan change.
( b ) *Annual reporting requirements for phase-down support recipients.* By January 31, 2024, 2025, and 2026, recipients of support under § 54.1504(b) shall file with the Commission a report of how they spent phase-down support on resiliency and redundancy measures consistent with the approved spending plan approved under paragraph (a).
( c ) Recipients of support under § 54.1504(b) that fail to use all such support consistent with the approved spending plan approved under paragraph (a) by December 31, 2026 shall return an amount equal to the unused amount of support to the Administrator within 30 days of December 31, 2026.
( d ) By January 31, 2027 recipients of support under § 54.1504(b) shall file with the Commission a final report of how they spent phase-down support on resiliency and redundancy measures consistent with the approved spending plan approved under paragraph (a).
[88 FR 29000, May 5, 2023]
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 154 (Thursday, August 10, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 45842]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6833]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel NIH Pathway to Independence Award.
    Date: August 24-25, 2006.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Meredith D. Temple-O'Connor, PhD, Office of 
Scientific Review, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, 
National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Drive, Room 3AN12C, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-2772, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5b2f3e362b373e3438361b363a323775353233753c342d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a0d4c5cdd0ccc5cfc3cde0cdc1c9cc8ecec9c88ec7cfd6">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental 
Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, 
Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: July 31, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-6833 Filed 8-9-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 10.6

               AMENDMENT TO AUTO LOAN PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT ("Amendment") to the AUTO LOAN PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT
("Agreement") dated and effective May 4, 2000 by and between E-LOAN, Inc.
("E-LOAN") and TranSouth Financial Corporation ("TranSouth") is entered into and
effective this 10th day of January, 2001:

FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION the receipt and sufficiency of which is
expressly acknowledged by the parties hereto, E-LOAN and TranSouth agree to the
Amendment to Exhibit B and Exhibit D as follows:

EXHIBIT B:  PURCHASE CRITERIA

[*]



<PAGE>



               AMENDMENT TO AUTO LOAN PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT

EXHIBIT D:  LOAN DOCUMENTS

o        Note and Security Agreement
o        Copy of front and back of Documentary Draft to fund
         immediately and Original Copy in timely fashion.
o        Drivers License(s)
o        Proof of Insurance
o        Title Application
o        Sale Contract (New Vehicle)
o        Bill of Sale or Buyers Order (Used Vehicle)
o        Odometer Statement (Used Vehicle)
o        Warranty Certificate (if applicable)
o        Proof of Income, if requested by TranSouth on Tiers 1 & 2.
         Required for Tiers 3 & 4
o        Proof of Residency for Tiers 3 & 4
o        No References for Tiers 1 and 2, Four Completed References
        (name, address, phone number) for Tiers 3  and 4.

The Agreement is hereby modified and amended to incorporate the terms and
conditions set forth herein, which shall supersede and prevail over any
conflicting terms of the Agreement. Except for this change to Exhibit B and
Exhibit D, all of the terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force
and effect.

TRANSOUTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION                     E-LOAN, INC.

By:   /S/ ILLEGIBLE                                 By:   /S/ STEPHEN M. HERZ
      ------------------------------                      -------------------
      Authorized Signature                                Authorized Signature

Name:  CHRIS GOODMAN                                Name:  STEPHEN M. HERZ
       -----------------------------                       ---------------


Title:  OPERATIONS VP                               Title:  SVP CONSUMER LOANS
        ----------------------------                        ------------------


                                                    By:   /S/ MATT ROBERTS

                                                          Authorized Signature

                                                    Name:  MATT ROBERTS

                                                    Title  CFO
                                                           ---

                                      -2-
§ 301-76.100 Are there any due process requirements with which we must comply before collecting undisputed delinquent amounts on behalf of the charge card contractor? Yes, you must: ( a ) Provide the employee with written notice of the type and amount of the claim, the intention to collect the claim by deduction from the employee's disposable pay, and an explanation of the employee's rights as a debtor;
( b ) Give the employee the opportunity to inspect and copy your records related to the claim;
( c ) Allow an opportunity for a review within the agency of your decision to collect the amount; and
( d ) Provide the employee an opportunity to make a written agreement with the contractor to repay the delinquent amount.
[FTR Amdt. 90, 65 FR 3058, Jan. 19, 2000, as amended by FTR Case 2022-05, 89 FR 12253, Feb. 16, 2024]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTSPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,Oliver R. Grace, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of Moscow CableCom Corp. (the "Company"),in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, to the best of myknowledge, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedMay 31, 2004 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission:
    - Fully complies with the     requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of     1934; and  
    - The information     contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the     financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/           Oliver R. Grace,Jr.Name:     Oliver R. Grace, Jr.Title:        Chairman of the Board, President andChief Executive Officer               (Principal Executive Officer)Date:       July 20, 2004
#### CHARLES H. DUDLEY *v.*JOHN McKENZIE.

*Impounding Beast. Penalty for not Giving Notice.*•

1. The statute allows fifty cents for every twenty-four hours’ neglect to give notice of • the impounding of heasts. The defendant impounded eighty sheep belonging to the plaintiff for three days, without giving him notice. *Held,*that the plaintiff could recover only fifty cents for each day, and not fifty cents for each one of the eighty sheep each day.

2. R. L. s. 3980, — impounding heasts, giving notice, &e., construed.

Heard at the May Term, 1881, on the report of a referee, Taft, J., presiding. Action, debt to recover the penalty allowed for neglecting to give notice of impounding beasts.

- The court rendered judgment for the plaintiff to recover $1.50, and his costs ; appealed by the plaintiff. The defendant impounded eighty of the plaintiff’s sheep, and-neglected for three days to give notice in accordance with the statute. The only question before the court was, whether the plaintiff could recover fifty cents for every twenty-four hours, or, fifty cents for each one of the eighty-sheep for every twenty-four hours.

*Gilbert A.*Davis, for the plaintiff,

cited 37 Yt. 56 ; 30 Yt. 746 ; Sedgw. Stat. Law, p. 326, 231; 17 Yt. 479.

*William E. Johnson,*for the defendant,

cited 7 Yt. 363 ; 16 Yt. 68.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Yeazey, J.

Section 3980, of the Revised Laws, reads as follows:

“ If a person so impounding a beast does not give such notice he shall forfeit to such owner or keeper fifty cents for every twenty-four hours’ neglect to do so, and shall pay the damage which,” *&c.*

Under this provision the forfeiture would be no more in the case of several beasts found in one’s enclosure and impounded at *395the same time, than in the case of one beast. It is a penalty for the neglect in each instance of impounding, not for each beast impounded at one time. In this case the forfeiture is fifty cents for every twenty-four hours’ neglect to give the notice of the impounding of the eighty sheep, not fifty cents for each one of the eighty.

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 3

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                     OF THE
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                             ANAREN MICROWAVE, INC.

        Pursuant to Section 805 of the New York Business Corporation Law

      Lawrence A. Sala and David M.  Ferrara,  the  undersigned,  President  and
Secretary of Anaren Microwave, Inc. (the "Corporation"), hereby certify:

            1. The name of the  Corporation  is Anaren  Microwave,  Inc.  It was
formed under the name Micronetics, Inc.

            2. The  Corporation's  Certificate of Incorporation was filed by the
New York Department of State on August 11, 1967.

            3. Paragraph FIRST,  setting forth the name of the  Corporation,  is
hereby amended to read as follows:

            FIRST, The name of the Corporation is Anaren, Inc.

            4. This  amendment to the  Certificate  of  Incorporation  of Anaren
Microwave,  Inc.  was  authorized,  pursuant to section  803(a) of the  Business
Corporation Law, by vote of the Board of Directors,  followed by the vote of the
holders of over a majority of all outstanding shares entitled to vote thereon at
a meeting  of the  shareholders  of the  Corporation,  duly  called  and held in
accordance with the New York Business Corporation Law.

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  we have signed this Certificate of Amendment on
December  20,  2002 and we affirm that the  statements  in this  Certificate  of
Amendment are true under the penalties of perjury.

                                             /s/ Lawrence A. Sala
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Lawrence A. Sala
                                             President

                                             /s/ David M. Ferrara
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             David M. Ferrara
                                             Secretary
#### § 22.377 Certification of transmitters.

Transmitters used in the Public Mobile Services, including those used with signal boosters, in-building radiation systems and cellular repeaters, must be certificated for use in the radio services regulated under this part. Transmitters must be certificated when the station is ready for service, not necessarily at the time of filing an application. The FCC may list as certificated only transmitters that are capable of meeting all technical requirements of the rules governing the service in which they will operate. The procedure for obtaining certification is set forth in part 2 of this chapter.

[78 FR 25174, Apr. 29, 2013]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2573
DOYLE JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ENTERPRISE LEASING COMPANY, d/b/a Enterprise Rent-A-Car; AMY SNYDER, Defendants - Appellees, and ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR, Defendant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-98-367-A) Submitted: June 22, 1999 Decided: July 13, 1999 Before ERVIN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 David A. Branch, LAW OFFICES OF DAVID A. BRANCH, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Eugene Scalia, GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(C).

PER CURIAM: Doyle Johnson appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment for the Appellees in this Title VII action, 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e - 2000e-17 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. We note that Johnson’s claims of negligent supervision and negligent retention are not cognizable under Virginia law. See Chesapeake & Potomac Tel. Co. v. Dowdy , 365 S.E.2d 751, 754 (Va. 1988). Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See Johnson v. Enterprise Leasing , No. CA-98- 367-A (E.D. Va. Sept. 24, 1998). We grant the Appellees’ motion to dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4623 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4623

 Entitled the ``Anti-Hypocrisy Deficit Reduction Act'', to provide for 
          anti-hypocritical adjustments for fiscal year 1994.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 22, 1994

  Mr. Obey (for himself, Mr. Sarpalius, Ms. Shepherd, Mr. Bonior, Mr. 
    Wise, and Mr. Derrick) introduced the following bill; which was 
    referred jointly to the Committees on Government Operations and 
                             Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 Entitled the ``Anti-Hypocrisy Deficit Reduction Act'', to provide for 
          anti-hypocritical adjustments for fiscal year 1994.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

                 TITLE I--DISCRETIONARY CAP ADJUSTMENTS

SECTION 101. DOWNWARD ADJUSTMENT OF DISCRETIONARY SPENDING LIMITS.

    The discretionary spending limits (new budget authority and 
outlays) for fiscal year 1994 set forth in section 601(a)(2) of the 
Congressional Budget Act of 1974, as adjusted in strict conformance 
with section 251 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control 
Act of 1985, shall be reduced, as calculated by the Director of the 
Office of Management and Budget, in amounts equal to the aggregate 
amounts of rescissions under title II for that fiscal year.

SEC. 102. SPENDING LIMITS FOR FISCAL YEARS 1995-1998.

    (a) Reduction in Spending Limits.--The discretionary spending 
limits (new budget authority and outlays) for each of fiscal years 
1995, 1996, 1997, and 1998 set forth in section 601(a)(2) of the 
Congressional Budget Act of 1974, as adjusted in strict conformance 
with section 251 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control 
Act of 1985, shall be reduced, as calculated by the Director of the 
Office of Management and Budget, by the aggregate amounts of 
rescissions under title II for fiscal year 1994, plus any additional 
savings for that fiscal year as a result of the enactment of title III.
    (b) Definition.--For purposes of subsection (a), the term 
``additional savings for that fiscal year as a result of the enactment 
of title III'' means the net aggregate amount (if any) by which fiscal 
year 1994 appropriations (before any rescissions made under title II) 
for all programs, projects, and activities for which new authorization 
levels are established by title III exceeds those new authorization 
levels for fiscal year 1995, 1996, 1997, or 1998, as the case may be.

                    TITLE II--REDUCTIONS IN SPENDING

SEC. 201. RESCISSIONS.

    TITLE III--CHANGES IN AUTHORIZATION STATUTES TO EFFECT SPENDING 
                               REDUCTIONS

                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32(a) 

In connection with the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-QSB/A of Hendrx Corp. (“Registrant”) for the quarterly periodended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (“Report”), I, Hendrik Tjandra, chief executive officer, hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

(1)              This Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in this          Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and          results of operationof the Registrant.

         

/s/ Hendrik TjandraHendrikTjandraChief Executive OfficerSeptember 8, 2005 

This certification accompanies thisReport pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except tothe extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant forthe purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Thiscertification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the SecuritiesAct of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether madebefore or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporationlanguage contained in such filing. 

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by §906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retainedby the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request. 

----