alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.14


Schedule of Executive Officer and Director
Compensation for 2007 


Set
forth below is a description of the compensation that MathStar, Inc.
determined to pay its executive officers (defined in Item 402(a)(3) of
Regulation S-K) in their current positions for the year ending
December 31, 2007.


	
  Name

  	
   

  	
  2007 Base Salary

  	
   

  	
  Potential Bonus 

  2007 Stock Option 

  Awards (1)(2)

  	
   

  
	
  Douglas M. Pihl, 

  President and Chief Executive Officer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  220,000

  	
   

  	
  110,000

  	
   

  
	
  Ronald K. Bell, 

  Chief Technology Officer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  240,000

  	
   

  	
  —

  	
   

  
	
  Daniel J. Sweeney, 

  Chief Operating Officer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  180,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  90,000

  	
   

  
	
  Glen Wiley, 

  Vice President, Sales

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  150,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  130,000

  	
   

  
	
  James W. Cruckshank, 

  Chief Financial Officer and

  Vice President, Administration

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  175,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  87,500

  	
   

  
	
  Sean P. Riley,

  Vice President, Marketing

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  170,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  65,000

  	
   

  
	
  Timothy A. Teckman, 

  Vice President, Engineering

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  150,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  60,000

  	
   

  



 






	
  (1)

  	
   

  	
  Reflects the maximum potential bonus the named
  officer could earn under this bonus plan adopted by the Compensation
  Committee.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  (2)

  	
   

  	
  For 2007, Mr. Wiley’s bonus is based on the
  achievement of certain design wins and revenue goals.

  



 


Schedule of Director Compensation for 2007 


Set
forth below is a description of the compensation that MathStar, Inc.
determined to pay to its directors for the year ending December 31, 2007.


Cash Compensation


	
  Retainer:

  	
   

  	
  $1,500 per quarter

  
	
  Board Meeting
  Fee

  	
   

  	
  $750 per meeting

  
	
  Audit Committee:

  	
   

  	
  $1,000 per meeting for chairman, $750 meeting for other
  members

  
	
  Other
  Committees:

  	
   

  	
  $750 per meeting for chairman, $500 per meeting for
  other members

  



 













Equity
Compensation to Non-Employee Directors


	
  Initial Option Grant:

  	
   

  	
  To new non-employee directors, ten-year option to
  purchase 25,000 shares, vesting over three years on the first, second and
  third anniversary dates of the date of grant if the director is then a
  director of MathStar, at an exercise price equal to the exercise price of the
  common stock on the date of grant.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Annual Grant:

  	
   

  	
  Upon the re-election of each non-employee director
  to the board, ten-year option to purchase 5,000 shares, vesting one year
  after grant if the director is then a director of MathStar, at an exercise
  price equal to the exercise price of the common stock on the date of grant.
#### George Nails, *Plaintiff in Error,*vs. The State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

143 So. 759.

Division A.

Decision filed October 3, 1932.

*Jolm L. Neeley,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Cary D. Landis,*Attorney General, and *Boy Camipbell,*Assistant for the State.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J. and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.
No. 11-5530.

#### Evans *v.*New York.

Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.
#### E. T. Seales, *Plaintiff in Error*vs. Dorsey-Knight Motors, Inc., a Florida corporation, *Defendant in Error.*

142 So. 656.

Divisioin B.

Decision filed June 27, 1932.

*64*J. F. Albert Eche*and *Shipp, Evans & Kline,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Miller, McKay, Dixon & DeJm'nette,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This case having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to' be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no errob in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P.J. and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.
<PAGE>


Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report MIV Therapeutics, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended February 28, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Alan P.
Lindsay, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Alan Lindsay
--------------------
Alan P. Lindsay
Chairman and CEO
April 23, 2007
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Angel
Acquisition Corp., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brent Fouch, Treasurer,
Principal Accounting Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.
    ANGEL ACQUISITION CORP.
 Dated:
November 4,
2008                                  /s/  Brent
Fouch
 By: Brent Fouch,
Treasurer, Principal Accounting Officer and
Director
No. 10-10796.

#### Williams *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2


                        CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report MIV Therapeutics, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended November 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Patrick McGowan, as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of his knowledge, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.



/s/ Patrick McGowan
---------------------------
Patrick McGowan
CFO
January 14, 2006
No. 11-5363.

#### Wines *v.*Michigan.

Ct. App. Mich. Certio-rari denied.
§ 65.830 Deducted items. ( a ) The following items shall be deducted from the interstate rate base. ( 1 ) The interstate portion of deferred taxes (Accounts 4100 and 4340).
( 2 ) The interstate portion of customer deposits (Account 4040).
( 3 ) The interstate portion of other long-term liabilities in (Account 4300 Other long-term liabilities and deferred credits) that were derived from the expenses specified in Sec. 65.450(a).
( 4 ) The interstate portion of other deferred credits in (Account 4300 Other long-term liabilities and deferred credits) to the extent they arise from the provision of regulated telecommunications services. This shall include deferred gains related to sale-leaseback arrangements.
( b ) The interstate portion of deferred taxes, customer deposits and other deferred credits shall be determined as prescribed by 47 CFR part 36.
( c ) The interstate portion of other long-term liabilities included in (Account 4300 Other long-term liabilities and deferred credits) shall bear the same proportionate relationships as the interstate/intrastate expenses which gave rise to the liability.
[54 FR 9049, Mar. 3, 1989, as amended at 62 FR 15118, Mar. 31, 1997; 67 FR 5703, Feb. 6, 2002]
No. D-2632.

#### In re Disbarment of Poole.

[For earlier order herein, see *ante,*p. 918.]

Disbarment entered.
### MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE 38TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF UV ALDE COUNTY, GREETIN GS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on October 8, 2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or rev erse your judgment between

Interest of BLJP, Appellant

V.

No. 04

- 14

- 00015

- CV and Tr. Ct. No. 12

- 05

- 28687

- CV

was determined, and therein our said Court of Appeals made its order in these words:



## In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgm ent is AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that appellee, Bryan P., recover his costs of this appeal from appellant, Veronica G.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order o f our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS the Hon. Catherine Stone, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas, with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on January 14, 2015

.
KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLE RK

____________________________ Cynthia A. Mart inez Deputy Clerk, Ext. 3853BILL OF COSTS


### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH DISTRICT, AT SAN ANTONIO

No. 04

- 14

- 00015

- CV

Interest of BLJP

v.

(NO. 12

- 05

- 28687

- CV IN 38TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF UV ALDE COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY MOTION FEE MOT ION FEE REPORTER'S RECORD INDIGENT STATEWIDE EFILING FE E FILING SUPREME COURT CHAPTE R 51 FEE $15.00 $10.00 $936.00

$25.00 $20.00 $100.00

$50.00 E

- PAID E

- PAID PAID E

- PAID E

- PAID E

- PAID

E

- PAID ROGELIO MUNOZ SARA SPECTOR ROGELIO M. MUNOZ ROGELIO MUNOZ ROGELIO MUNOZ ROGELIO MUNOZ

ROGELIO MUNOZ

Balance of costs owing to the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio, Texas: 0.00

**Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.**

I, KEITH E. HOTTLE , CLERK OF THE FOURTH COURT OF APP EALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as th e same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for the Fourth District of Texas, this January 14, 2015

.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

____________________________ Cynthia A. Martinez Deputy Clerk, Ext. 3853
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 4- 12 75

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el le e

v. Bjorn C hr is ti an Lus te r
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll an t

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e North ern Dis tri ctof I owa , W at erl oo

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Sep te m

be r 12 , 20 14 Fi le d: Sep te m

be r 17 , 20 14 [Unpubl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re WOL LMAN, BYE, andSMITH, Ci rcu it Ju dg es
.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.
Bjorn Lus te r di rect ly ap pe al s th e wit hi n- Gui de li ne s- ran ge se nt en ce th e di st ric t
c ou rt im po se d aft er he pl ed gu il ty t o po ss es si ng a de st ru ct iv e de vi ce. His c o u n s e l 1

The Hon or ab le Lin da R. Rea de , Ch ie f Ju dg e, Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Co ur t fo r 1 th e Nor th ern Dis tri ctof I owa
.ha s m ov ed to w i t h d r a w , a nd ha s fil ed a br ie f un de r And ers v. Cal ifo rn ia , 38 6 U.S.

73 8 (1 96 7) , arg ui ng th atth e di st ric t cou rt pro cedur al ly erre d by ba si ng it s sel ect io n of Lus te r’s se nt en ce on an un pr ov en fact , an d th at th e co ur t im po se d a su bs ta nt iv el y
un reas on ab le se nt en ce. Upo n care fu l rev ie w, we co nc lu de th at th e di st ric t co ur t di d

no t pr oc edur al ly err or im po se a su bs ta nt iv el y un r e a s o n a b l e se nt en ce. See Uni te d St at es v. Feem st er, 57 2 F.3 d 45 5, 46 0- 61 (8 th Ci r. 20 09 ) (en ba nc ) (s et ti ng fo rth st an da rd s fo r rev ie win g se nt en ci ng de ci si on s; whe re se nt en ce fal ls wit hi n Gui de li ne s
ran ge , ap pe al s co ur t m ay , bu t is no t req ui red to , ap pl y p r e su m pt io n of

reas o n a b l e n e s s ) ; se e al so Uni te d St at es v. Bo la no s, 40 9 F.3 d 10 45 , 10 48 (8 th Ci r. 2 0 0 5 ) ( whe re th ere are two pe rm is si bl e vi ews of ev id en ce, fact fin de r’s ch oi ce be twee n t he m

can no t b e cl earl y

erro ne ou s)

.
Hav in g in de pe nd en tl y rev ie wed th e reco rd in acco rd an ce wit h Pen so n v. Ohi o, 48 8 U.S. 75 (1 98 8) , we fin d no no nf riv ol ou s is su es
. Acco rd in gl y , co un se l’s m ot io n to wit hd raw i s g ran te d, an d t he jud gm en t i s af fir m ed

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
#### § 27.804 Field strength limits at WMTS facility.

For any operation in the 1392-1395 MHz band, the predicted or measured field strength—into the WMTS band at 1395-1400 MHz—shall not exceed 150 uV/m at the location of any registered WMTS healthcare facility. When performing measurements to determine compliance with this provision, measurement instrumentation employing an average detector and a resolution bandwidth of 1 MHz may be used, provided it accurately represents the true interference potential of the equipment.
#### § 302-5.10 How soon may I and/or my spouse begin a househunting trip?

You may begin your househunting trip as soon as your agency has notified you of your transfer and issued a travel authorization for a househunting trip. To take maximum advantage of your trip, however, it is very important that you become familiar as quickly as you can with your new official station area (e.g., housing market conditions, school locations, etc.). If you are selling your residence at your old official station, you should not begin your househunting trip until you have a current appraisal of the value of the residence so that you can more accurately determine the appropriate price range of residences to consider during your househunting trip.
No. 11-9967.

#### Cervantes-Aguilar, aka Aguilar Cervantes, aka Cervantes Aguilar *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION IX 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 

February 26, 2009 

Andrew Goodrich, EM 

Director, Air Quality Management Division 

Washoe County District Health Department 

P.O. Box 11130 

Reno, Nevada 89520-0027 

Dear Mr. Goodrich: 

In response to your request, dated January 15,2009, the U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region IX, (EPA) hereby grants to the Washoe County District 

Health Department, Air Quality Management Division (Washoe County) formal 

delegation of the following Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 63 (40 CFR Part 

63) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP): 

Subpart VVV - Publicly Owned Treatment Works 

Subpart EEEE - Organic Liquids Distribution (Non-Gasoline) 

Subpart WWWW - Reinforced Plastic Composites Production 

Subpart ZZZZ - Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines 

Subpart WWWWW - Hospital Ethylene Oxide Sterilizers 

Subpart BBBBBB - Gasoline Distribution Bulk Terminals, Bulk Plants 

and Pipeline Facilities 

Subpart CCCCCC - Gasoline Dispensing Facilities 

Subpart HHHHIIH - Paint Stripping and Miscellaneous Surface Coating 

Operations at Area Sources 

Subpart 000000 - Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication Operations 

Area Sources 

Subpart WWWWWW - Area Source Standards for Plating and Polishing 

Operations 

Subpart XXXXXX - Area Source Standards for Nine Metal Fabrication 

and Finishing Source Categories 

Regarding any other 40 CFR Part 63 standard previously delegated to Washoe 

County, this letter is also delegating any amendments made to those standards as of 

August 28, 2008. In this letter, we are responding only to your request for delegation of 

40 CFR Part 63 NESHAP. You will receive a separate letter addressing delegation of 40 

CFR Part 60 Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources. 

Pnnted on Recyrled Paper 

p- "-- <--. - -- - - - -- 
These delegations are being granted in accordance with the Memorandum of 

Agreement (MOA) dated June 24, 1997, with an amendment dated December 16, 1998, 

between Washoe County and EPA regarding the delegation of NESHAP. As set forth in 

the MOA, these delegations are effective upon the date of this letter and EPA will publish 

a future Federal Register notice to codify these delegations into the Code of Federal 

Regulations. 

We appreciate Washoe County's efforts to implement the federal air toxics 

program and hope to continue working with you to reduce emissions of air toxics in your 

area. If you have any questions about this delegation, please call me at (41 5) 947-871 5 or 

have your staff contact Mae Wang at (41 5) 947-4124. 

Sincerely, 

Director, Air Division 

cc: Charlene Albee, Washoe County
#### § 51.203 Number portability.

The rules governing number portability are set forth in part 52, subpart C of this chapter.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-20166

Summary Calendar

JAMES-ZACHARY CLIFTON JORDAN,

Plaintiff−Appellant,

versus

NOAH ZAVOLAS,

Defendant−Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

No. 4:18-CV-4

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

In this diversity case stemming from an auto accident, the plaintiff 

appeals a take-nothing judgment based on the jury’s answer of “no” to the 

question, “Did the negligence, if any, of Noah Zavolas proximately cause the 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 10, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-20166 Document: 00515267063 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/10/2020
No. 19-20166

2

occurrence in question?” The magistrate judge, who tried the case by consent, 

denied plaintiff’s motion for new trial, succinctly explaining that “under Texas 

law, being the ‘cause’ of an accident does not equate with being negligent.” 

Thus, despite that the defendant admitted to being the cause for having 

crossed the center line on a curve on a slippery road, there was sufficient evidence for the jury to find no negligence.

The judgment is AFFIRMED, essentially for the reasons given by the 

magistrate judge.

 Case: 19-20166 Document: 00515267063 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/10/2020
CERTIFICATIONS
 
 I, Timothy F. Lockinger, certify that;
 
 (1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of American Wagering, Inc.;
 
 (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
 the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
 by this report;
 
 (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
 financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 (4) The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
 (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
 
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
 supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
 to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
 about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
 evaluation; and
 
 c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
 business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
 affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 (5) The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over
 financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors (or persons
 performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
 reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business
 issuers internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date: April 29, 2004
 
 
 /s/ Timothy F. Lockinger
 By: Timothy F. Lockinger
 Title: Principal Financial Officer
   1