alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 32.18 Waivers.

A waiver from any provision of this system of accounts shall be made by the Federal Communications Commission upon its own initiative or upon the submission of written request therefor from any telecommunications company, or group of telecommunications companies, provided that such a waiver is in the public interest and each request for waiver expressly demonstrates that: existing peculiarities or unusual circumstances warrant a departure from a prescribed procedure or technique; a specifically defined alternative procedure or technique will result in a substantially equivalent or more accurate portrayal of operating results or financial condition, consistent with the principles embodied in the provisions of this system of accounts; and the application of such alternative procedure will maintain or improve uniformity in substantive results as among telecommunications companies.
#### § 27.1602 Incumbent Federal operations.

Regarding incumbent Federal operations in the 3450-3550 MHz band, 3.45 GHz Service licensees must comply with footnote US431B of the Table of Frequency Allocations in 47 CFR 2.106.
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 2.1071 Cross reference.

The general provisions of this subpart shall apply to equipment subject to Supplier's Declaration of Conformity.

[82 FR 50829, Nov. 2, 2017]
No. 11-5569.

#### Jones *v.*Cain, Warden.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
§ 5.504 Responsible party. Compliance testing licensees must identify a single point of contact responsible for all experiments conducted under the license, including ensuring compliance with all applicable FCC rules: ( a ) The responsible individual will serve as the initial point of contact for all matters involving interference resolution and must have the authority to discontinue any and all experiments being conducted under the license, if necessary.
( b ) The name of the responsible individual, along with contact information, such as a phone number and email address at which he or she can be reached at any time of the day, must be identified on the license application, and this information will be listed on the license. Licensees are required to keep this information current.
[78 FR 25162, Apr. 29, 2013]
#### AARON BYRD and ERIC COOMBS, Petitioners v. FRANKLIN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, Respondent

No. 462A14

Filed 6 November 2015

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, _ N.C. App. _, 765 S.E.2d 805 (2014), affirming in part and reversing in part an order entered on 24 September 2013 by Judge Robert H. Hobgood in Superior Court, Franklin County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 5 October 2015.

*George B. Currin for petitioner-appellants.*

*Davis, Sturges & Tomlinson, by Aubrey S. Tomlinson, Jr., for respondent-appellee.*

*Williams Mullen, by Camden R. Webb, for Second Amendment Foundation, Inc., amicus curiae.*

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed.

REVERSED.
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.719 Informal complaints filed pursuant to section 258. ( a ) Notwithstanding the requirements of §§ 1.716 through 1.718, the following procedures shall apply to complaints alleging that a carrier has violated section 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, by making an unauthorized change of a subscriber's preferred carrier, as defined by § 64.1100(e) of this chapter.
( b ) *Form.* The complaint shall be in writing, and should contain: The complainant's name, address, telephone number and e-mail address (if the complainant has one); the name of both the allegedly unauthorized carrier, as defined by § 64.1100(d) of this chapter, and authorized carrier, as defined by § 64.1100(c) of this chapter; a complete statement of the facts (including any documentation) tending to show that such carrier engaged in an unauthorized change of the subscriber's preferred carrier; a statement of whether the complainant has paid any disputed charges to the allegedly unauthorized carrier; and the specific relief sought.
( c ) *Procedure.* The Commission will resolve slamming complaints under the definitions and procedures established in §§ 64.1100 through 64.1190 of this chapter. The Commission will issue a written (or electronic) order informing the complainant, the unauthorized carrier, and the authorized carrier of its finding, and ordering the appropriate remedy, if any, as defined by §§ 64.1160 through 64.1170 of this chapter.
( d ) Unsatisfied Informal Complaints Involving Unauthorized Changes of a Subscriber's Preferred Carrier; Formal Complaints Relating Back to the Filing Dates of Informal Complaints. If the complainant is unsatisfied with the resolution of a complaint under this section, the complainant may file a formal complaint with the Commission in the form specified in § 1.721. Such filing will be deemed to relate back to the filing date of the informal complaint filed under this section, so long as the informal complaint complied with the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section and provided that: The formal complaint is filed within 45 days from the date an order resolving the informal complaint filed under this section is mailed or delivered electronically to the complainant; makes reference to both the informal complaint number assigned to and the initial date of filing the informal complaint filed under this section; and is based on the same cause of action as the informal complaint filed under this section. If no formal complaint is filed within the 45-day period, the complainant will be deemed to have abandoned its right to bring a formal complaint regarding the cause of action at issue.
[65 FR 47690, Aug. 3, 2000]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Office of the Secretary

                    Section 30.13 of the Department of Health and Human Services' claims                           ( print page 46913)                        collection regulations (45 CFR Part 30) provides that the Secretary shall charge an annual rate of interest as fixed by the Secretary of the Treasury after taking into consideration private consumer rates of interest prevailing on the date that HHS becomes entitled to recovery. The rate generally cannot be lower than the Department of the Treasury's current value of funds rate or the applicable rate determined from the “Schedule of Certified Interest Rates with Range of Maturities.” This rate may be revised quarterly by the Secretary of the Treasury and shall be published quarterly by the Department of Health and Human Services in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

                    The Secretary of the Treasury has certified a rate of 12                    5/8                    % for the quarter ended June 30, 2006. This interest rate will remain in effect until such time as the Secretary of the Treasury notifies HHS of any change.                

Dated: August 9, 2006.

Jean Augustine,

Director, Office of Financial Policy and Reporting.

[FR Doc. 06-6917 Filed 8-14-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-04-M
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of SATELINX INTERNATIONAL INC.(the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jean-Francois Amyot, President and acting CFO, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: November 17, 2004

By:/s/ Jean-Francois Amyot

Name: Jean-Francois Amyot

Title:    President and Acting CFO
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 2, 2013 

# Order

Clerk December 2, 2013

146157 ( 50 )

RICHARD L. WURTZ,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 146157

v COA: 301752

Genesee CC: 10

- 092901

- CL

BEECHER METROPOLITAN DISTRICT,

LEO MCCLAIN, JACQUELIN CORLEW,

a nd SHEILA THORN,

Defendants

- Appellants

.

______________________________ /

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Michigan Association for Justice

for leave to file an amicus curiae brief is GRANTED. The amicus brief submitted on

November 26, 2013, is accepted for filing.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN RE: ESTATE OF VICTOR 

SANGIULIANO

PETITION OF: DEBRA A. SLACK

:

:

:

:

:

No. 681 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of March, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.1503 Proceedings covered. ( a ) The EAJA applies to adversary adjudications conducted by the Commission. These are adjudications under 5 U.S.C. 554 in which the position of the Commission or any other agency of the United States, or any component of an agency, is presented by an attorney or other representative who enters an appearance and participates in the proceeding. Any proceeding in which this Agency may fix a lawful present or future rate is not covered by the EAJA. Proceedings to grant or renew licenses are also excluded, but proceedings to modify, suspend, or revoke licenses are covered if they are otherwise “adversary adjudications”.
( b ) The Commission may designate a proceeding as an adversary adjudication for purposes of the EAJA by so stating in an order initiating the proceeding or designating the matter for hearing. The Commission's failure to designate a proceeding as an adversary adjudication shall not preclude the filing of an application by a party who believes the proceeding is covered by the EAJA; whether the proceeding is covered will then be an issue for resolution in proceedings on the application.
( c ) If a proceeding includes both matters covered by the EAJA and matters specifically excluded from coverage, any awards made will include only fees and expenses related to covered issues.
[47 FR 3786, Jan. 27, 1982, as amended at 52 FR 11653, Apr. 10, 1987]
No. 11-5709.

#### Miller *v.*Fayram, Warden.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-1189.

#### Roberts *v.*Albertson’s LLC et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# University of Texas at San Antonio - Cybersecurity Manufacturing Innovation Institute

/ Published Nov. 27, 2023

Paper info.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

___________________________

No. 97-10313

Summary Calendar

___________________________

PERTECH COMPANY, JERRY L. PERRY, PERITECH, INC., DEBRON INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

VERSUS

VIDEOJET SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

___________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Texas

(4:96-CV-538-Y)

___________________________________________________ December 11, 1997

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Appellants raise three issues in this appeal. Appellants

first contend that despite the fact that they had two and one-half

years during which to conduct discovery, the district court abused

its discretion in declining to reopen discovery. The district

court had the discretion to decide that the Appellants had ample

opportunity to make discovery, and it did not abuse its discretion

in declining to extend discovery under the circumstances presented

in this case.2

The Appellants next contend that the district court abused its

disc retion in excluding a number of their witnesses. The

Appellants submitted the names of 19 additional witnesses only six

weeks before trial. The Appellants had previously failed to

include the names of these witnesses in response to the Appellee's

earlier interrogatories, and no valid reason was offered for this

failure. The district court did not abuse its discretion in

excluding these witnesses.

Finally, three of the Appellants argue that the district court

abused its discretion in declining to enter a default judgment

against Videojet. The Appellants’ counterclaim was ambiguous with

respect to whether it was brought by one or by all four of the

Appellants. As a result of that ambiguity, Videojet answered the

counterclaim only with respect to one of the Appellants. The

district court considered the Appellee's failure to answer the

countercl aim as to three of the Appellants as justified, and

declined to enter a default judgment in favor of those three

Appellants. This is not an abuse of the district court’s

considerable discretion.

There is no merit to any of the Appellants’ arguments, and

therefore we affirm the judgment of the district court.

AFFIRMED.
§ 101.55 Considerations involving transfer or assignment applications. ( a ) Except as provided for in paragraph (d) of this section, licenses not authorized pursuant to competitive bidding procedures may not be assigned or transferred prior to the completion of construction of the facility.
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) At its discretion, the Commission may require the submission of an affirmative, factual showing (supported by affidavits of a person or persons with personal knowledge thereof) to demonstrate that the proposed assignor or transferor has not acquired an authorization or operated a station for the principal purpose of profitable sale rather than public service. This showing may include, for example, a demonstration that the proposed assignment or transfer is due to changed circumstances (described in detail) affecting the licensee subsequent to the acquisition of the license, or that the proposed transfer of radio facilities is incidental to a sale of other facilities or merger of interests.
( d ) If a proposed transfer of radio facilities is incidental to a sale or other facilities or merger of interests, the showing specified under paragraph (c) of this section shall be submitted and include an additional exhibit that: ( 1 ) Discloses complete details as to the sale of facilities or merger of interests;
( 2 ) Segregates clearly by an itemized accounting, the amount of consideration involved in the sale of facilities or merger of interests; and
( 3 ) Demonstrates that the amount of consideration assignable to the facilities or business interests involved represents their fair market value at the time of the transaction.
[61 FR 26677, May 28, 1996, as amended at 63 FR 6104, Feb. 6, 1998; 63 FR 68982, Dec. 14, 1998; 65 FR 38327, June 20, 2000; 68 FR 4955, Jan. 31, 2003]
Exhibit 4.3

FIRST AMENDMENT  TO  CONVERTIBLE SUBORDINATED PROMISSORY NOTE

This First Amendment to Convertible Subordinated Promissory Note (this "Amendment") is intended to be
permanently affixed to that certain Convertible Subordinated Promissory Note, dated as of February 28, 2001, issued by U.S. SEARCH.COM INC. a Delaware corporation
("Borrower"), in favor of PEQUOT PRIVATE EQUITY FUND II, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership ("Holder")
in the outstanding principal amount of five million dollars $5,000,000.00 (the "Note"). When so affixed this Amendment shall constitute part of the
Note.

The
Note is hereby amended, effective as of March 30, 2001, by:





1

---



and
(d) replacing Section 2.3 in its entirety with the following:

The
Note is hereby further amended by deleting in its entirety Section 3.3 thereof.

Except
as amended hereby the provisions of the Note shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. This Amendment shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the
laws of the State of New York.

[Signatures Page follows]

2

---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Borrower and Holder have caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of the 30th day of March, 2001.

|                                                                   |                  | US SEARCH.COM INC.,
  a Delaware corporation
|------------------------------------------------------------------ | ---------------- | --------------------------------------------
|                                                                   |                  | By:                                         
|                                                                   |                  | Brent N. Cohen
   Chief Executive Officer   
|Acknowledged as of the
30th day of March, 2001:                    |                  |                                             
|PEQUOT PRIVATE EQUITY FUND II, L.P.,a Delaware limited partnership |                  |                                             
|By: Pequot Capital Management, Inc.,                               |                  |                                             
|                                                                   |                  | its Investment Manager                      
|                                                                   | By:              |                                             
|                                                                   |                  |                                             
|                                                                   | Kevin E. O'Brien |                                             
|                                                                   | General Counsel  |                                             

3

---

QuickLinks
No. 11-5247.

#### Hooper *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 3.2





Mohegan Tribe of Indians of Connecticut


Ballot for Amendment to Article V of the Mohegan Constitution





Instructions:


| |  | Use a blue or black ink pen or a #2 pencil
|- |  | ------------------------------------------

| |  | Completely fill in the bubble below the selection you wish to vote for
|- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | Completely erase mistakes
|- |  | -------------------------

| |  | You must select one of the choices or ballot will be voided
|- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------

| |  | For further assistance contact a member of the Election Committee
|- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------




Do not fold this ballot form!!!





---




Current Wording of Article V. Section 1





ARTICLE VMEMBERSHIP





Section 1.    The membership of the Mohegan Tribe/Mohegan Nation
shall consist of the following persons:





(a) All living persons whose name or ancestors name appears on the
tribal roll, as of federal recognition by the United States of America on May 15, 1994.





(b) All persons who
become enrolled with The Tribe, pursuant to compliance with The Tribal Membership/Enrollment Ordinance, by June 30, 1996.





(c) All descendants of persons who are currently enrolled with The Tribe, and all descendants of persons who become enrolled with The Tribe pursuant to Article V, Section 1(b).





Proposed Wording of Article V, Section 1





ARTICLE
VMEMBERSHIP





Section 1. The membership of the Mohegan Tribe/Mohegan Nation shall consist of the
following persons:





(a) All persons enrolled with the Mohegan Tribe as of May 11, 2002, as listed on the May 11,
2002 Mohegan Tribal Roll, as certified by the Council of Elders.





(b) All persons born on or after May 11, 2001,
who are lineal descendants of those persons listed on the May 11, 2002 Mohegan Tribal Roll.





Do you agree to amend Article V, Section
1 of the Mohegan Constitution as stated above?





YES

NO ̈

 ̈
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Employee Forms & Resources - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"fPIXCcj44C\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/the-court\/human-resources\/employee-forms-resources\/\">Employee Forms & Resources<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/the-court\/human-resources\/employee-forms-resources\/embed\/#?secret=fPIXCcj44C\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Employee Forms & Resources” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"fPIXCcj44C\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Resources for All Employees Resources for Court Staff Only Resources for Law Clerks Only Resources for Interns Resources for All Employees Employment Forms Federal Judicial Branch Application for Employment (pdf) I-9 Employment Eligibility Form (pdf) Direct Deposit Form (pdf) Federal Tax Withholding (pdf) DC Tax Withholding* (pdf) Maryland Tax Withholding* (pdf) Virginia Tax Withholding* (pdf) […]"}