alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE OF ALASKA 

### ) ) ss. ) FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

AFFIDAVIT OF CANCELLATION OF ORAL HEARING I, Rebecca Tyson Smith, Environmental Program Specialist of the Department of Environmental Conservations, being sworn, state the following: The Department of Environmental Conservation tentatively scheduled an oral hearing, available upon request as stated in the notice of proposed regulations, for April 18, 2014, at 1200 - 1330, in Conference Room A, Department of Environmental Conservation Building, 619 E. Ship Creek, Ste. 249, Anchorage, AK 99501. No member of the public requested an oral hearing, and the public hearing was cancelled and noticed as stated in the notice of proposed regulations. DATE: 5May'14 Junea, Alsk

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this 5thdayof M,2014.

My commission expires: w i t h o f f i c e .
No. 11-5089.

#### Bey, aka Lewis *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-9478.

#### Salerno *v.*Michigan.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Clerk's Office - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"aBCSVOY4u7\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/the-court\/clerks-office\/\">Clerk’s Office<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/the-court\/clerks-office\/embed\/#?secret=aBCSVOY4u7\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Clerk’s Office” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"aBCSVOY4u7\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"About the Clerk’s Office The Clerk’s Office manages the court’s case docket and calendar; maintains and preserves the court’s records; provides courtroom support during court hearings; issues notices, orders, and opinions; administers attorney admissions; collects fees; and serves as the conduit for information between the court, the litigants, and the public. Clerk of Court Jarrett […]"}
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering Special Emphasis Panel; ZEB1 OSR-A (O2) S—Conference Grants.                    

*Date:*                         August 18, 2006.                    

*Time:*                         12 p.m. to 2 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health/NIBIB, Democracy II, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Contact Person:*                         David George, PhD, Director, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 920, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-8633,                         *georged1@mail.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

Dated: August 1, 2006.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 06-6824 Filed 8-9-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
No. 11-5386.

#### Jost *v.*United States Postal Service et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 160 (Friday, August 18, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 47823]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6934]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5045-N-33]


Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless.

EFFECTIVE DATES: August 18, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, 
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and 
speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-
free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-
7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus 
Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for 
suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the 
purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been 
determined suitable or unsuitable this week.

    Dated: August 10, 2006.
Mark R. Johnston,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.
[FR Doc. 06-6934 Filed 8-17-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-M
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Community Bank
Corporation of America (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Stan B. McClelland, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the
period covered by the report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |     |  |                                            
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------
|Date: November 13, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/ Stan B. McClelland                     
|                        |  |     |  | Stan B. McClelland, Chief Financial Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Confidential Documents - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"anwHsdjeXq\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/case-information\/case-filings\/confidential-documents\/\">Confidential Documents<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/case-information\/case-filings\/confidential-documents\/embed\/#?secret=anwHsdjeXq\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Confidential Documents” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"anwHsdjeXq\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"At the Federal Circuit, confidential or sealed documents are governed by Federal Circuit Rule 25.1.\u00a0 Filers should review Federal Circuit Rule 25.1 and relevant portions of the Electronic Filing Procedures before filing a confidential or sealed document. At the Federal Circuit, documents filed a “confidential” are treated the same as documents filed “under seal.” For […]"}
§ 51.301 Duty to negotiate. ( a ) An incumbent LEC shall negotiate in good faith the terms and conditions of agreements to fulfill the duties established by sections 251 (b) and (c) of the Act.
( b ) A requesting telecommunications carrier shall negotiate in good faith the terms and conditions of agreements described in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) If proven to the Commission, an appropriate state commission, or a court of competent jurisdiction, the following actions or practices, among others, violate the duty to negotiate in good faith: ( 1 ) Demanding that another party sign a nondisclosure agreement that precludes such party from providing information requested by the Commission, or a state commission, or in support of a request for arbitration under section 252(b)(2)(B) of the Act;
( 2 ) Demanding that a requesting telecommunications carrier attest that an agreement complies with all provisions of the Act, federal regulations, or state law;
( 3 ) Refusing to include in an arbitrated or negotiated agreement a provision that permits the agreement to be amended in the future to take into account changes in Commission or state rules;
( 4 ) Conditioning negotiation on a requesting telecommunications carrier first obtaining state certifications;
( 5 ) Intentionally misleading or coercing another party into reaching an agreement that it would not otherwise have made;
( 6 ) Intentionally obstructing or delaying negotiations or resolutions of disputes;
( 7 ) Refusing throughout the negotiation process to designate a representative with authority to make binding representations, if such refusal significantly delays resolution of issues; and
( 8 ) Refusing to provide information necessary to reach agreement. Such refusal includes, but is not limited to: ( i ) Refusal by an incumbent LEC to furnish information about its network that a requesting telecommunications carrier reasonably requires to identify the network elements that it needs in order to serve a particular customer; and
( ii ) Refusal by an incumbent LEC to furnish cost data that would be relevant to setting rates if the parties were in arbitration.
[61 FR 45619, Aug. 29, 1996, as amended at 68 FR 52294, Sept. 2, 2003]
§ 302-11.6 For which expenses will I be reimbursed if I qualify for a residence transaction expense allowance? If you qualify for a residence transaction expense allowance, you may be reimbursed for the: ( a ) Expenses of selling your old residence and purchasing a new residence in the United States; or
( b ) Settlement of an unexpired lease at your old official station in the United States from which transferred to another official station in the United States or when assigned to a foreign post of duty; and
( c ) Expenses of purchasing a new residence in the United States upon return to the United States upon completion of the foreign tour of duty and the return is to a different official station, and is 50 miles distance from the official station which you transferred from.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"23-110: In Re KERR [ORDER], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Q9TrJOGjos\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/03-01-2023-23-110-in-re-kerr-order-23-110-order-3-1-2023_2088074\/\">23-110: In Re KERR [ORDER], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/03-01-2023-23-110-in-re-kerr-order-23-110-order-3-1-2023_2088074\/embed\/#?secret=Q9TrJOGjos\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“23-110: In Re KERR [ORDER], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"Q9TrJOGjos\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"ORDER Posted: In Re KERR [ORDER](pdf) Appeal Number: 23-110 Origin: RIT Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7482

GARY E. WHETZEL,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GEORGE TRENT,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior

District Judge. (CA-97-49-2)

Submitted: January 12, 1999 Decided: February 17, 1999

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gary E. Whetzel, Appellant Pro Se. Dawn Ellen Warfield, OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Gary E. Whetzel appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See Whetzel v. Trent, No. CA-97-49-2

(N.D.W. Va. Sept. 17, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
1 

### Brown, Kelly

From: Sasser, Erika Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 4:42 PM To: Brown, Kelly Subject: FW: Overview of Proposed Changes in O3 NAAQS Packag e Attachments: Proposed changes to O3 NAAQS_102714.pdf

Please post email and attachment(s) to Ozone NAAQS Rulemaking docket. Thanks

From: Sasser, Erika Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 5:02 PM To: 'Frey, Nathan J.' Cc: Wesson, Karen; Kimber Scavo; Keating, Martha Subject: Overview of Proposed Changes in O3 NAAQS Package

Nathan—

In response to your request for a roadmap to help o rient interagency reviewers to the sections of the draft O3 NPRM that they may wish to concentrate on during the rev iew process, we have prepared the attached 2 pager. This simply highlights the proposed changes in each section, an d may be useful to reviewers trying to identify whi ch section(s) they want to focus on. Please send to the interagency g roup.
Thanks, Erika
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Angel Acquisition Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven Bonenberger, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of the Company. 
| By: /s/ Steven Bonenberger

Steven Bonenberger

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting, Executive and Financial Officer)

May 23, 2011 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
§ 32.26 Materiality. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, companies may abide by the materiality standards of GAAP when implementing this system of accounts.
( b ) For companies that receive High-Cost Loop Support, or Connect America Fund Broadband Loop Support, materiality shall be determined consistent with the general materiality guidelines promulgated by the Auditing Standards Board.
[82 FR 20840, May 4, 2017]
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

IBKUL UBHOT LTD.,

Appellant

v.

ALFWEAR, INC.,

Appellee

______________________ 

2020-2120

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in No. 

91233985.

______________________ 

Decided: October 13, 2021 

______________________ 

DARREN J. QUINN, Law Offices of Darren J. Quinn, Del 

Mar, CA, argued for appellant.

 S. BRANDON OWEN, Ray Quinney & Nebeker P.C., Salt 

Lake City, UT, argued for appellee. Also represented by 

ADAM RICHARDS; TRENT BAKER, Baker IP PLLC, Salt Lake 

City, UT. 

 ______________________ 

Case: 20-2120 Document: 51 Page: 1 Filed: 10/13/2021
2 IBKUL UBHOT LTD. v. ALFWEAR, INC. 

Before MOORE, Chief Judge, PROST and TARANTO, Circuit 

Judges.

PER CURIAM. 

IBKUL UBHOT LTD. appeals a Trademark Trial and 

Appeal Board decision sustaining Alfwear, Inc.’s opposition 

to registration of a mark, “IBKÜL.” Alfwear, Inc. v. IBKUL 

UBHOT LTD., Opposition No. 91233985, 2020 WL 

3429163, at *1 (T.T.A.B. June 2, 2020). Although Alfwear 

alleged consumers would likely confuse IBKÜL with four 

of Alfwear’s registered marks, the Board considered confusion with respect to only one of those marks, “KÜHL.” Id.

at *8. After the Board’s decision and while this appeal was 

pending, the KÜHL mark was cancelled because Alfwear 

failed to file a declaration of use under 15 U.S.C. § 1058. 

The parties agree that cancellation necessarily impacts the 

Board’s findings. Accordingly, we vacate and remand for 

the Board to reconsider its findings in light of the cancellation. 

VACATED AND REMANDED

COSTS

No costs.

Case: 20-2120 Document: 51 Page: 2 Filed: 10/13/2021
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.411 Commencement of rulemaking proceedings.

Rulemaking proceedings are commenced by the Commission, either on it own motion or on the basis of a petition for rulemaking. See §§ 1.401-1.407.