alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
..A_rJ 

:~ ~( 

~ 

Regulator-y Evaluation 

Docket No. FAA-l 0/5-/q <67 bfcf--AI.M-£ t(tJ..-4.D 

Directorate Identifier: -AD 

/(mumake dwnges lo the l'a/ues in the lohlc hdmr. you must en.wre the fowls update ocwrdi11gh-. If 

rlier do 11of. dick (or Tah) imo wulthe11 our u/fhe c/l(rngl.'d cl.'/1. 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g .. aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) 

Do (include cost (labor+ u.s. for U.S. Fleet nor include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

SB 670BA-32-040 

Part A: 24.0 hr 

Part B: 24.0 hr y.6 ' - l .ll q 

$31,000 ·i 269 ,,, I 

Part C: 20.0 hr tie1-0 Part D: 20.0 hr 

SB 670BA-32-042 1.5 269 1.5 hr 

SB 670BA-32-043 14.0 269 14.0 hr f t; 

ModSum 

IS670528200033 4 ' 269 

4 hr 

' 

' ' .. I 

I 

'I ,,I 

' I ' ' 

I ' ,, 

'' ,, ,I I ' !• 

I ('1 ,, 

.l 

1•(1 " f f ~{ ' I 

' ' 

d· I 

The known number of products in compliance: 0 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet : SI0.796.988 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) s 

On-Condition Costs: 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g .. Inspection. (include access. (@$85/hour) 

replacement) testing. and closeup) 
Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this .field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might 110t be obvious. Thisjield can also be used to explain warranty costs): Not All the SB 

are required to complied with. Depending on the option operator elect to use SB or combination or 

SB and ModSum is applicable. see MCAI for the configration detail. 

Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a ''significant regulatory action '?~ 

YES* D NO IZ1 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? ~ 

YES* D NOIZ] 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Y cs or No answer. 'ilt· 

YES D NO IZ1 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? @ 

YES· D NO [.81 

*Explanation:
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19

- 1513 V

UNPUBLISHED

BARRY TAYLOR

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: February 14, 2022

Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;

Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Guillain

- Barre Syndrome (GBS)

John Robert Howie, Howie Law, PC, Dallas, TX , for Petitioner.

Camille Michelle Collett , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On September 30, 2019

, Barry Ta ylor filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq. 2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered Guillain

- Barr é syndrome ( “ GBS ” ) as a
result of an influenza ( “ flu ” ) vaccine that was adm inister ed to him on September 27, 201 6

. Petition at 1

. T he case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of
Special Masters.

On February 10, 2022

, R espondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that P etitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at

1. Specifically, R espondent agrees that Petitioner has sat isfied the criteria set forth in the
Vaccine Injury Table and the Qualifi cations and Aids to I nterpretation

. Id. at 6

.

1 Because this unpublished R uling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required
to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

- Government Act

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government
Services). This means the R uling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,
the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that

the identified material fits within this definition, I wil l redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for ease

of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012 ).2

Respondent further agrees that “ this case was timely filed, that the vaccine was received

in the United States, and that petitioner satisfies the statutory severity requirement b y suffering the resi dual effects or complicati ons of his injury for more than six months after

vaccine administration

. ” Id. at 7.

In view of R espondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that

P etitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Availability of Live Audio Access to April 2020 Court Session - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"fcH08Xpd07\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/availability-of-live-audio-access-to-april-2020-court-session\/\">Availability of Live Audio Access to April 2020 Court Session<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/availability-of-live-audio-access-to-april-2020-court-session\/embed\/#?secret=fcH08Xpd07\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Availability of Live Audio Access to April 2020 Court Session” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"fcH08Xpd07\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Due to the declaration of public health emergencies in the National Capital Region, the court will be providing media and public access to the live audio of each panel scheduled for argument during the April 2020 session.\u00a0 Access information for each panel will be posted on the court’s website by 9:00 a.m. (Eastern) each day […]"}
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4595

To designate the building located at 4021 Laclede in St. Louis, Missouri,

for the period of time during which it houses operations of the United

States Postal Service, as the ‘‘Marian Oldham Post Office’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 17, 1994

Mr. CLAY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Post Office and Civil Service

A BILL

To designate the building located at 4021 Laclede in St.

Louis, Missouri, for the period of time during which

it houses operations of the United States Postal Service,

as the ‘‘Marian Oldham Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The building located at 4021 Laclede in St. Louis,

5 Missouri, shall, for the period of time during which it

6 houses operations of the United States Postal Service, be

7 known and designated as the ‘‘Marian Oldham Post Of8 fice’’.
2

•HR 4595 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the building

4 referred to in section 1 shall, with respect to the period

5 referred to in section 1, be deemed to be a reference to

6 the Marian Oldham Post Office.

Æ
162

163

164

165

166

167

168

169

170

171

172

173

174

175

176

177

178

179

180

181

182

183

184

185

186

187

188

189

190

191

192

193

194

195

196

197

198

199

200

201

202

203

204

205

206

207

208

209

210

211

212

213

214

215

216

217

218

219

220

221

222

223

224

225

226

227

228

229

230

231

232

233

234

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2010-12-23T16:21:57-0500
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
#### § 25.284 [Reserved]
<PAGE> 1


                                   EXHIBIT 11

   STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE - (UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                For the Three Months Ended          For the Six Months Ended
                                                         March 31,                          March 31,
                                             -------------------------------   -------------------------------
(dollars in thousands except per
            share amounts)                         2004            2003              2004              2003
----------------------------------------     --------------   --------------   --------------    -------------
<S>                                            <C>               <C>              <C>               <C>
Net earnings (loss)                             $ (1,269)             $  4         $ (1,561)           $  564
Effect of conversion of preferred                    101               100              203               200
securities
Diluted earnings (loss)                           (1,168)              104           (1,358)              764
Weighted average common shares
outstanding                                    3,012,434         3,012,434        3,012,434         3,012,434
Effect of conversion of preferred
securities (1)                                 1,371,429         1,371,429        1,371,429         1,371,429
Common stock equivalents due to
dilutive effect of stock options (1)              38,469            31,958           39,062            28,257

Total weighted average common shares
and common share equivalents
outstanding (1)                                4,422,332         4,415,821        4,422,925         4,412,120
Basic earnings (loss) per common share            $(0.42)            $0.00           $(0.52)            $0.19
Diluted earnings (loss) per common
share                                             $(0.42)            $0.00           $(0.52)            $0.17
(1) Effect of conversion of preferred securities and dilutive effect of stock options are not considered in the
calculation of earnings per share for the three and six months ended March 31, 2004 because the impact is
antidilutive.
</TABLE>
NDU iCollege Recertified By NIETP
 By Patricia Coopersmith
  On March 25, 2013, the iCollege received word from the National IA Education
and Training Program (NIETP) that elements of the college's Cyber Security
curriculum comprising the NSTISSI 4011, 4015 and CNSSI 4012, 4016A series of
national standards has passed recertification and approval.  The
recertification is for five years.  This is a critical step in maintaining the
academic standing of the iCollege with key stakeholders, including DOD, NSA,
DHS, federal agencies, and our academic partners.  The certification validates
that the college's curriculum still meets these national standards and will
remain valid until they expire or the standards are updated, replaced, or
canceled.  The iCollege leadership team and Cyber Department Chairperson would
like to thank all iCollege faculty & staff for collaborating on the many
facets of student learning, academic support, course development, and teaching
that made this achievement possible.
§ 25.160 Administrative sanctions. ( a ) A forfeiture may be imposed for failure to operate in conformance with the Communications Act, license specifications, any conditions imposed on an authorization, or any of the Commission's rules and regulations; or for failure to comply with Commission requests for information needed to complete international coordination or for failure to cooperate in Commission investigations with respect to international coordination.
( b ) A forfeiture will be imposed and the station license may be terminated for the malicious transmissions of any signal that causes harmful interference with any other radio communications or signals.
( c ) A station license may be revoked for any repeated and willful violation of the kind set forth in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.
( d ) The sanctions specified in paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of this section will be imposed only after the licensee has been provided an opportunity to be heard pursuant to titles III and V of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.
( e ) For purposes of this section, the term “repeated” and “willful” are defined as set out in section 312(f) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 312(f).
No. 11-9268.

#### Griffin *v.*Ramsey et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report of Palomar Enterprises, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, as  filed  with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steve Bonenberger, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:



(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of  1934;  and



(2)     The  information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Dated:  November 21, 2005.



/s/  Steve Bonenberger

Steve Bonenberger, President, Chief Executive

Officer and Director
12/13/2011 15:58 FAX 2024935142 FA A ^ OHS 001/00 2 

DgM •j^RARTMFNT OF 

'"iAliSPORTATlON 

.(^OKbT OPERATIONS 

IN THE MATTER OF: 

D & M CUSTOM INJECTION MOLDING CORPORATION / • - - '-I r 

- 20'.-

TAADocket No. CPliai-OOOO 

Judge Richard C Goodwin (p}bil~ OLV^ 

\r\r~ • .. 

RESPONSE TO COMPLAlNANT^S MONTION TO DEEM ALLEGATION ADMITTED 

AND FOR JUDGEMEKT ON THE PLEADINGS OR FOR HEARING ON SANCTION ONLY 

HEREWITH, the respondent respectfully, 

(a) takes no objection lo granting the Complainant's motion deeming admission of the 

truth of the complainant's allegations; 

(b) requests a hearing on this matter limited to the issue of sanction only. 

Respectfijlly submitted. 

Michael Teofilovich, President 

D & M Custom Injection Molding Corporation 

dba D & M Plastics Corporation 

150 French Road 

Burlington, IL 60109 
12/13/2011 15:58 FAX 2024935142 ^f^ ^ 

. BU S (2002/002 

D^M 

D&MPrASriCSCX>RP . 

lyOVOOl & ISO {3485Cerririi-(| 

Decembers, 2011 

Federal Aviation Administration '" ' • " " - i-^, 

800 Independence Avenue, SW • '-—^ -.„^' 

Washington, DC 20591 

AtteniioniHearing Docket Clerk r;__ C : 20't1 

Wilbur Wnght Building- Suite 2W1000 

Kate Barber 

Attorney, Office of the regional Counsel A / •i /^ 

Great Lakes Region, AGL-7B ^6(1 " 0^1 / 

Federal Aviation Administration / 

2300 Eat Devon Avenue 

DesPlaines,IL 60018 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judges 

Office of Hearing, M-20 

US- Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washingtoa DC 20590 

15(1 Fr(?ncli Ro.id/ ^0 . Go^ l.'?^ ' BiirlJiiLiloii H|rnoJ5 6"M.i9-Oj.SK ' f^.p-, (SSi-Zd^-t / f.-ix ('K-l7MiH;f-27'
§ 61.19 Detariffing of international and interstate, domestic interexchange services. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in paragraphs (b) through (e) of this section, or by Commission order, carriers that are nondominant in the provision of international and interstate, domestic interexchange services shall not file tariffs for such services.
( b ) Carriers that are nondominant in the provision of international and domestic, interstate, interexchange services are permitted to file tariffs for dial-around 1 + services. For the purposes of this paragraph, dial-around 1 + calls are those calls made by accessing the interexchange carrier through the use of that carrier's carrier access code.
( c ) Carriers that are nondominant in the provision of international and domestic, interstate, interexchange services are permitted to file a tariff for such services applicable to those customers who contact the local exchange carrier to designate an interexchange carrier or to initiate a change with respect to their primary interexchange carrier. Such tariff will enable the interexchange carrier to provide service to the customer until the interexchange carrier and the customer consummate a written agreement, but in no event shall the interexchange carrier provide service to its customer pursuant to such tariff for more than 45 days.
( d ) Carriers that are nondominant in the provision of international inbound collect calls to the United States are permitted to file a tariff for such services.
( e ) Carriers that are nondominant in the provision of “on-demand” Mobile Satellite Services are permitted to file a tariff for such services applicable to those customers that have not entered into pre-existing service contracts designating a specific provider for such services.
[66 FR 16881, Mar. 28, 2001]
§ 17.49 Recording of antenna structure light inspections in the owner record. The owner of each antenna structure which is registered with the Commission and has been assigned lighting specifications referenced in this part must maintain a record of any observed or otherwise known extinguishment or improper functioning of a structure light. This record shall be retained for a period of two years and provided to the FCC or its agents upon request. The record shall include the following information for each such event: ( a ) The nature of such extinguishment or improper functioning.
( b ) The date and time the extinguishment or improper operation was observed or otherwise noted.
( c ) Date and time of FAA notification, if applicable.
( d ) The date, time and nature of adjustments, repairs, or replacements made.
[48 FR 38477, Aug. 24, 1983, as amended at 61 FR 4364, Feb. 6, 1996; 79 FR 56987, Sept. 24, 2014]
###### Editorial Note on Part 36

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 74 FR 23956, May 22, 2009, 77 FR 30411, May 23, 2012, 82 FR 25538, June 2, 2017, and corrected at 83 FR 4153, Jan. 30, 2018. Nomenclature changes to part 36 also appear at 83 FR 63587, Dec. 11, 2018, and 84 FR 4360, Feb. 15, 2019.

#### § 36.321 Central office expenses—Accounts 6210, 6220, and 6230.

(a) The expenses related to central office equipment are summarized in the following accounts:

| Central Office Switching Expense | Account 6210. |
| --- | --- |
| Operator Systems Expense | Account 6220. |
| Central Office Transmission Expense | Account 6230. |

Table 1 to Paragraph (a)

(b) The expenses in these accounts are apportioned among the operations on the basis of the separation of the investments in central office equipment—Accounts 2210, 2220 and 2230, combined.

[52 FR 17229, May 6, 1987, as amended at 69 FR 12552, Mar. 17, 2004; 83 FR 63586, Dec. 11, 2018]
No. 11-1282.

#### Williams v. Virginia.

Sup. Ct. Va. Certio-rari denied.
No. 11-8863.

#### Graham *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*[565 U. S. 1258] denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4576 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4576

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 28 (legislative day, June 7), 1994

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the Federal building located at the northeast corner of 
the intersection of 14th Street and Independence Avenue, Southwest, in 
  Washington, District of Columbia, as the ``Jamie L. Whitten Federal 
                              Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at the northeast corner of the 
intersection of 14th Street and Independence Avenue, Southwest, in 
Washington, District of Columbia, shall be known and designated as the 
``Jamie L. Whitten Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Jamie L. Whitten 
Federal Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 27, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### § 3.70 Investigations.

The Commission may investigate any complaints made against accounting authorities to ensure compliance with the Commission's rules and with applicable ITU Regulations and other international maritime accounting procedures.