alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 5.5 Definition of terms.

For the purposes of this part, the following definitions shall be applicable. For other definitions, refer to part 2 of this chapter (Frequency Allocations and Radio Treaty Matters; General Rules and Regulations).

*Authorized frequency.* The frequency assigned to a station by the Commission and specified in the instrument of authorization.

*Authorized power.* The power assigned to a radio station by the Commission and specified in the instrument of authorization.

*Emergency notification providers.* All participants in the Emergency Alert System, as identified in section 11.1 of this chapter.

*Experimental radio service.* A service in which radio waves are employed for purposes of experimentation in the radio art or for purposes of providing essential communications for research projects that could not be conducted without the benefit of such communications.

*Experimental station.* A station utilizing radio waves in experiments with a view to the development of science or technique.

*Harmful interference.* Any radiation or induction that endangers the functioning of a radionavigation or safety service, or obstructs or repeatedly interrupts a radio service operating in accordance with the Table of Frequency Allocations and other provisions of part 2 of this chapter.

*Landing area.* As defined by 49 U.S.C. 40102(a)(28), any locality, either of land or water, including airdromes and intermediate landing fields, that is used, or intended to be used, for the landing and take-off of aircraft, whether or not facilities are provided for the shelter, servicing, or repair of aircraft, or for receiving or discharging passengers or cargo.

*Market trial.* A program designed to evaluate product performance and customer acceptability prior to the production stage, and typically requires testing a specific product under expected use conditions to evaluate actual performance and effectiveness.

*Open Area Test Site.* A site for electromagnetic measurements that has a reflective ground plane, and is characterized by open, flat terrain at a distance far enough away from buildings, electric lines, fences, trees, underground cables, pipelines, and other potential reflective objects, so that the effects due to such objects are negligible.

*Person.* An individual, partnership, association, joint stock company, trust, corporation, or state or local government.

*Product development trial.* An experimental program designed to evaluate product performance (including medical devices in clinical trials) in the conceptual, developmental, and design stages, and typically requiring testing under expected use conditions.

[78 FR 25162, Apr. 29, 2013, as amended at 80 FR 52414, Aug. 31, 2015]
§ 5.1 Basis and purpose. ( a ) *Basis.* The rules following in this part are promulgated pursuant to the provisions of Title III of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, which vests authority in the Federal Communications Commission to regulate radio transmissions and to issue licenses for radio stations.
( b ) *Purpose.* The rules in this part provide the conditions by which portions of the radio frequency spectrum may be used for the purposes of experimentation, product development, and market trials.
**EXHIBIT
31.2**
 **CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER**
 Section
302 Certification
 
 I, Douglas
H. Caszatt , certify
that:
  1.  I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of VendingData
Corporation;
  2.  Based on
my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3.  Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
  4.  The small
business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:
  a)  Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
  b)  Evaluated
the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and
  c)  Disclosed
in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s fourth
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial
reporting; and
  5.  The small
business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business
issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
  a)  All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial
data information; and
  b)  Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting.
  Date: April 29, 2005
    By:
    /s/
      Douglas H. CaszattDouglas H. Caszatt,Acting Chief Financial Officer and
      Controller
§ 32.4330 Unamortized nonoperating investment tax credits—net. ( a ) This account shall be credited and Account 7400, Nonoperating Taxes, shall be debited with investment tax credits generated from qualified expenditures related to other operations which the company has elected to defer rather than recognize currently in income.
( b ) This account shall be debited and Account 7400 credited with a proportionate amount determined in relation to the useful book life of the property to which the tax credit relates.
[67 FR 5690, Feb. 6, 2002]
```

[House Report 106-101]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

106th Congress                                                   Report
 1st Session            HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES                 106-101

=======================================================================

 
   PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 1184, EARTHQUAKE HAZARDS 
                  REDUCTION AUTHORIZATION ACT OF 1999

                                _______
                                

   April 20, 1999.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

    Mr. Dreier, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 142]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 142, by a record vote of 10 to 0, report the 
same to the House with the recommendation that the resolution 
be adopted.

               BRIEF SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION

    The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 1184, 
the ``Earthquake Hazards Reduction Authorization Act of 1999,'' 
under an open rule. The rule provides one hour of general 
debate divided equally between the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Science.
    The rule waives clause 4(a) of rule XIII (requiring a three 
day layover of the committee report) against consideration of 
the bill. This waiver is necessary because the committee report 
was not filed until Monday, April 19, and the bill is scheduled 
to be considered on the floor on Wednesday, April 21. The rule 
provides that the amendment in the nature of a substitute 
recommended by the Committee on Science now printed in the bill 
be considered as an original bill for the purpose of amendment. 
The rule provides that each section of the committee amendment 
in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read.
    The rule authorizes the Chair to accord priority in 
recognition to Members who have preprinted their amendments in 
the Congressional Record. The rule allows the Chairman of the 
Committee of the Whole to postpone votes during consideration 
of the bill, and to reduce voting time to five minutes on a 
postponed question if the vote follows a fifteen minute vote. 
Finally, the rule provides one motion to recommit with or 
without instructions.

                            committee votes

    Pursuant to clause 3(b) of House Rule XIII the results of 
each record vote on an amendment or motion to report, together 
with the names of those voting for and against, are printed 
below:

Rules Committee record vote No. 15

    Date: April 20, 1999.
    Measure: H.R. 1184, Earthquake Hazards Reduction 
Authorization Act of 1999.
    Motion by: Mr. Goss.
    Summary of motion: To report the rule.
    Results: Adopted 10 to 0.
    Vote by Members: Goss--Yea; Linder--Yea; Pryce--Yea; 
Hastings--Yea; Myrick--Yea; Sessions--Yea; Moakley--Yea; Hall--
Yea; Slaughter--Yea; Dreier--Yea.

                                

```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 27
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001082673
<NAME>                        ZEBALLOS MINING COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1
<CURRENCY>                                  US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-MOS          9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999    DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-01-2000    JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-2000    SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1              1
<CASH>                                  498              0
<SECURITIES>                              0              0
<RECEIVABLES>                             0              0
<ALLOWANCES>                              0              0
<INVENTORY>                               0              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        498              0
<PP&E>                                    0              0
<DEPRECIATION>                            0              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          498              0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                14,868              0
<BONDS>                                   0              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0              0
<PREFERRED>                               0              0
<COMMON>                             11,075              0
<OTHER-SE>                          (25,445)             0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            498              0
<SALES>                                   0              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          0              0
<CGS>                                     0              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           0              0
<INCOME-TAX>                              0              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       0              0
<DISCONTINUED>                            0              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0              0
<CHANGES>                                 0              0
<NET-INCOME>                         (4,624)         (9,291)
<EPS-BASIC>                               0              0
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0              0


</TABLE>
§ 301.120 Reports on agency Transition Plans. ( a ) *Deadline for initial report.* Not later than thirty (30) days after the receipt of a Federal Entity's Transition Plan submitted in accordance with applicable procedures set forth in Annex O of the NTIA Manual, the Technical Panel shall submit to NTIA and to such Federal Entity the Technical Panel's report on the sufficiency of the Transition Plan.
( b ) *Scope and content of initial report.* The Technical Panel's report shall include: ( 1 ) A finding as to whether the Federal Entity's Transition Plan includes the information required by the applicable provisions set forth in Annex O of the NTIA Manual;
( 2 ) An assessment of the reasonableness of the proposed timelines contained in the Federal Entity's Transition Plan;
( 3 ) An assessment of the reasonableness of the estimated relocation or sharing costs itemized in the Federal Entity's Transition Plan, including the costs identified by such plan for any proposed expansion of the capabilities of the Federal Entity's system; and
( 4 ) A conclusion, based on the finding and assessments pursuant to paragraphs (b)(1) through (3) of this section, as to the sufficiency of the Transition Plan.
( c ) *Insufficient Transition Plan.* In the event the Technical Panel's initial report concludes that the Federal Entity's Transition Plan is insufficient pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section, the report shall also include a description of the specific information or modifications that are necessary for the Federal entity to include in a revised Transition Plan.
( d ) *Revised plan.* If the Technical Panel finds the plan insufficient, the applying Federal Entity has up to 90 days to submit to NTIA and the Technical Panel a revised plan.
( e ) *Report on revised agency Transition Plans.* ( 1 ) Deadline for Supplemental Report. Not later than thirty (30) days after the receipt of a Federal Entity's revised Transition Plan submitted after an initial or revised plan was found by the Technical Panel to be insufficient pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section, the Technical Panel shall submit to NTIA and to such Federal Entity the Technical Panel's supplemental report on the sufficiency of the revised Transition Plan.
( 2 ) Scope and content of supplemental report. The Technical Panel's supplemental report on the revised Transition Plan shall include: ( i ) A finding as to whether the Federal Entity's revised Transition Plan includes the necessary information or modifications identified in the Technical Panel's initial report pursuant to paragraph (b)(1) of this section;
( ii ) A reassessment, if required, of the reasonableness of the proposed timelines contained in the Federal Entity's revised Transition Plan;
( iii ) A reassessment, if required, of the reasonableness of the estimated relocation or sharing costs itemized in the Federal Entity's revised Transition Plan; and
( iv ) A conclusion, based on the finding and reassessments pursuant to paragraphs (e)(2)(i) through (iii) of this section, as to the sufficiency of the revised Transition Plan.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
  THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 UNAUDITED BALANCE SHEET, INCOME STATEMENT
AND CASH FLOW STATEMENT, AND NOTES THERETO, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                   11,181,492
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                  1,013,222
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                       1,488,178
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       784,937
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 999,358
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,467,187
<COMMON>                                     2,161,181
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                          1,057,541
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               3,218,722
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         6,622,295<F1>
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             214,664
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   75,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               5,336,506
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               15,467,187
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    3,213,011
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            50,532
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   2,671,201
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   2,721,733
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        491,278
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             226,382
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 717,660
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       467,520
<NET-INCOME>                                   250,140
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  250,140
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       269,784
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0<F2>
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         152,320
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .33
<FN>
<F1>See Note F to financial statements; includes long term note payable.
<F2>Not reported on an interim basis.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# Prof Mark Duke Speaks About Cyber to FSI Audience

/ Published June 24, 2016

Professor Mark Duke 

On Wednesday, June 22, Professor Mark Duke of the NDU iCollege spoke to a large audience at the State Department's Foreign Service Institute (FSI) on the topic of Cyber Security in the Federal Sector. 

The School of Applied Information Technology (SAIT), Research, Learning & Development (RLD) Division in concert with the IRM Tradecraft Program invited Professor Duke to address the IRM Tradecraft – Class#45.  The presentation encompassed the subject of “Cyber Security in the Federal Sector" and was open to all FSI personnel.  

Mr. Duke’s areas of expertise include Information Assurance & Information Security, Network Engineering & Network Security, Certification & Accreditation (C&A), Emerging Technologies, and Fiber Optics & Wireless Systems and Telecommunications. Prior to joining the Information Resources Management College faculty, Mr. Duke served over 25 years in the U.S. Army, within U.S. Signal Corps Communication and Electronics. Mr. Duke was also a Joint Duty Officer with the National Security Agency as an Information Systems Security Engineer (ISSE) while supporting the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA), Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), DoD Joint Staff, the many organizations within the Intelligence Community (IC), and numerous Non-DoD agencies.

Courses include: Information Assurance and Critical Infrastructure Protection (AII), Approval to Operate: Information System Certification & Accreditation (ATO), and Global Enterprise Networking and Telecommunications (GEN), and Global Information Grid (GIG).  Duke has a B.A. from Sam Houston State University, an M.A. from Webster University, and an M.S. from George Mason University.  He is currently pursuing his Ph.D. in Engineering Management and Systems Engineering with George Washington University. He speaks to numerous audiences across the country about Cyber Security.  

Media Inquiries:  coopersmithp@ndu.edu .
No. 11M106.

#### AvidAir Helicopter Supply, Inc. *v.*Rolls-Royce Corp.

Motion for leave to file petition for writ of certio-rari with the supplemental appendix under seal granted.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT 

OF .- ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 

11 10 West Washington Street Phoenix, Arizona 85007 

Janice K. Brewer 

Governor 

Benjamin H. Crumbles 

Director 

APR 1 2 2OR 

Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX 

Mail Code ORA-1 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94 105 

RE: Submittal of Maricopa County Rules 3 10 and 3 10.01 revising the Maricopa County portion 

-. of the Arizona State Implementation Plan 

Dear Mr. Blumenfeld: 

Consistent with the provisions of Arizona Revised Statutes sections 49-104,49-404, and 49-406 

(Enclosure I), and the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, $9 5 1.102 through 5 1.104 and 

Appendix V to Part 51, the Arizona .Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) hereby 

adopts and submits to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Maricopa County Rules 

310 and 310.01, as revisions to the Maricopa County portion of the Arizona State 

Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions strengthen the existing rules and supersede the 

versions submitted on July 10, 2008, as elements of the Maricopa Association of Governments' 

Five Percent Plan for PMlo. 

Rule 310 regulates particulate matter emissions fiom any property, operations, or activity that 

may serve as a fugitive dust source. The revisions to Rule 310 clarify applicability, definitions, 

testing methods, and requirements for control measures. 

Rule 310.01 regulates particulate matter emissions for non-traditional sources that are not 

regulated by Rule 3 10, including sources that are not required to have a dust-control permit or 

plan; revisions to Rule 3 10.0 1 clarify applicability, exemptions, and requirements for control 

measures. 

Northern Regional Office Southern Regional Office 

1801 W. Route 66 Suite 1 17 Flagstaff, AZ 86001 400 West Congress Street Suite 433 Tucson, AZ 85701 

(928) 779-03 1 3 (520) 628-6733 

Printed on recycled paper 
Mr. Blumenfeld 

Page 2 of 2 

Enclosure 2 is the SIP Completeness Checklist; Enclosure 3 contains two hard copies and one 

electronic copy of Rule 3 10 and 3 10.01 and related documents for your review and action. 

If you have any questions, please contact Ira Domsky, Acting Director, Air Quality Division, at 

(602) 771-2308. 

Benjamin H. Grumbles 

Director 

Enclosures (3) 

Cc: Colleen McKaughan, EPA, w/o enclosures 

Jo Crumbaker, Maricopa County Air Quality Control District, w/o enclosures 

Ira Domsky, ADEQ, w/o enclosures