alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 63.63 Emergency discontinuance, reduction, or impairment of service. ( a ) Application for authority for emergency discontinuance, reduction, or impairment of service shall be made by electronically filing an informal request through the “Submit a Non-Docketed Filing” module of the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System. Such requests shall be made as soon as practicable but not later than 15 days in the case of public coast stations, or 65 days in all other cases, after the occurrence of the conditions which have occasioned the discontinuance, reduction, or impairment. The request shall make reference to this section and show the following: ( 1 ) The effective date of such discontinuance, reduction, or impairment, and the identification of the service area affected;
( 2 ) The nature and estimated duration of the conditions causing the discontinuance, reduction, or impairment;
( 3 ) The facts showing that such conditions could not reasonably have been foreseen by the carrier in sufficient time to prevent such discontinuance, reduction, or impairment;
( 4 ) A description of the service involved;
( 5 ) The nature of service which will be available or substituted;
( 6 ) The effect upon rates to any person in the community;
( 7 ) The efforts made and to be made by applicant to restore the original service or establish comparable service as expeditiously as possible.
( b ) Authority for the emergency discontinuance, reduction, or impairment of service for a period of 60 days shall be deemed to have been granted by the Commission effective as of the date of the filing of the request unless, on or before the 15th day after the date of filing, the Commission shall notify the carrier to the contrary. Renewal of such authority may be requested by letter or telegram, filed with the Commission not later than 10 days prior to the expiration of such 60-day period, making reference to this section and showing that such conditions may reasonably be expected to continue for a further period and what efforts the applicant has made to restore the original or establish comparable service. If the same or comparable service is reestablished before the termination of the emergency authorization, the carrier shall notify the Commission promptly. However, the Commission may, upon specific request of the carrier and upon a proper showing, contained in such informal request, authorize such discontinuance, reduction, or impairment of service for an indefinite period or permanently.
[28 FR 13229, Dec. 5, 1963, as amended at 45 FR 6585, Jan. 29, 1980; 80 FR 1588, Jan. 13, 2015]
#### § 43.72 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to 10 U.S.C.  Section  1350 as adopted  pursuant to Section 1350 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  in  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of
Electronic  Game Card,  Inc. on Form  10-QSB/A  for the period  ending March 31,
2005, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report") for Electronic Game Card, Inc., (the "Company"),  the undersigned
hereby certifies that:

(1)      to the  best of my  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with  the
         requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

(2)      to the best of my knowledge,  the  information  contained in the Report
         fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and
         result of operations of the Company.

May 5, 2006


/S/ LINDEN J. BOYNE
--------------------------------------------
    LINDEN J. BOYNE  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
<PAGE> 1


                                  EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Greater Atlantic Financial Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David E. Ritter Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

A.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

B.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     as of and for the period covered by the Report.




                                                 By: /s/ David E. Ritter
                                                 -----------------------
                                                 David E. Ritter
                                                 Senior Vice President and
                                                 Chief Financial Officer


                                                 Date:  May 27, 2004
EXHIBIT 99.1





CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





This
Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person for any other purpose.





The undersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officers, respectively, of SciQuest,
Inc. (the Company), hereby each certify as follows:





The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company
(the Report), which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/    STEPHEN J. WIEHEStephen J. Wiehe, Chief Executive Officer





/s/    JAMES J. SCHEUERJames J. Scheuer, Chief Financial Officer





Dated this 4th day of November, 2002.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4726

To amend the Appalachian Regional Development Act of 1965 to include

additional counties in the State of Mississippi as part of the Appalachian

region.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 12, 1994

Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Public Works and Transportation

A BILL

To amend the Appalachian Regional Development Act of

1965 to include additional counties in the State of Mississippi as part of the Appalachian region.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INCLUSION OF ADDITIONAL COUNTIES IN

4 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI AS PART OF APPA5 LACHIAN REGION.

6 The 5th undesignated paragraph of section 403 of

7 the Appalachian Regional Development Act of 1965 (40

8 U.S.C. App. 403) is amended—

9 (1) by inserting ‘‘Carroll’’ after ‘‘Calhoun’’;
2

HR 4726 IH

1 (2) by inserting ‘‘Grenada’’ after ‘‘Clay’’; and

2 (3) by inserting ‘‘Montgomery’’ after ‘‘Monroe’’.

Æ
No. 11-9997.

#### Mosley v. United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 99.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Jayme Dorrough, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Techlabs, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended
March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Techlabs, Inc.

May 14, 2003

                                        By: /s/ Jayme Dorrough
                                        Name: Jayme Dorrough
                                        Title: President, Principal Executive
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Team Health Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q (Form 10-Q) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, David P. Jones,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/S/    DAVID P.
JONESDavid P. Jones Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Date: May 3, 2011
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Yves Renaud, Director and Chief Financial Officer of BIMS Renewable Energy, Inc. (the Registrant) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Date:  August 19, 2003



/s/    Yves Renaud

Yves Renaud - Director and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4513 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4513

 To provide eligibility for space-available transportation on military 
  aircraft for former prisoners of war who are totally disabled as a 
               result of a service-connected disability.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 26, 1994

   Mr. Gilman (by request) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide eligibility for space-available transportation on military 
  aircraft for former prisoners of war who are totally disabled as a 
               result of a service-connected disability.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY FOR SPACE-AVAILABLE AIR TRANSPORTATION ON 
              MILITARY AIRCRAFT FOR DISABLED FORMER PRISONERS OF WAR.

    The Secretary of Defense shall provide that former prisoners of war 
(as defined in section 101 of title 38, United States Code) shall be 
eligible for space-available transportation on military aircraft to the 
same extent as retired members of the Armed Forces.

                                 <all>
```
#### § 301-52.21 Is there a minimum amount the late payment fee must exceed before my agency will pay it to me?

Yes, a late payment fee will only be paid when the computed late payment fee is $1.00 or greater.

[FTR Amdt. 90, 65 FR 3056, Jan. 19, 2000]
#### § 73.1692 [Reserved]
exv10w3wdwiv



 





Exhibit 10.3.d.iv




AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




     This Amendment to Employment Agreement is hereby entered into as of December 29, 2006 by and
among Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Corporation”), Cedar Shopping
Centers Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Partnership”) and Thomas B. Richey
(the “Executive”).



W I T N E S S E T H:




     WHEREAS, the Corporation, the Partnership and the Executive entered into that certain
Employment Agreement dated as of November 1, 2003, as presently in effect (the “Employment
Agreement”); and



     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Corporation (on the Corporation’s own behalf, and as
the sole general partner of the Partnership) approved the modification to certain provisions of the
Employment Agreement;



     NOW THEREFORE, intending to be legally bound the parties hereto agree as follows:



     1. Section 2.1 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as
follows:




“2.1 The term of employment shall end October 31, 2009, unless sooner terminated as
provided in this Agreement.”



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment to Employment Agreement as of the
date first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	CEDAR SHOPPING CENTERS, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ LEO S. ULLMAN
 	 
	 	 	Leo S. Ullman, President 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	CEDAR SHOPPING CENTERS PARTNERSHIP, L.P.

By: Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ LEO S. ULLMAN
 	 
	 	 	Leo S. Ullman, President 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	/s/ THOMAS B. RICHEY
 	 
	 	Thomas B. Richey
§ 5.402 Eligibility and usage. ( a ) Eligibility for medical testing licenses is limited to health care facilities as defined in § 95.1103(b) of this chapter.
( b ) Medical testing experimental radio licenses are for testing in clinical trials medical devices that use RF wireless technology for diagnosis, treatment, or patient monitoring for the purposes of, but not limited to, assessing patient compatibility and usage issues, as well as operational, interference, and RF immunity issues. Medical testing is limited to testing equipment designed to comply with the rules in part 15, Radio Frequency Devices; part 18, Industrial, Scientific, and Medical Equipment; part 95, Personal Radio Services subpart H—Wireless Medical Telemetry Service; or part 95, subpart I—Medical Device Radiocommunication Service.
( c ) Marketing of devices (as defined in § 2.803(a) of this chapter) is permitted under this license as provided in § 5.602.
[78 FR 25162, Apr. 29, 2013, as amended at 80 FR 52415, Aug. 31, 2015]
§ 5.203 Experimental authorizations for licensed broadcast stations. ( a ) Licensees of broadcast stations (including TV Translator, LPTV, and TV Booster stations) may obtain experimental authorizations to conduct technical experimentation directed toward improvement of the technical phases of operation and service, and for such purposes may use a signal other than the normal broadcast program signal.
( b ) Experimental authorizations for licensed broadcast stations may be requested by filing an informal application with the FCC in Washington, DC, describing the nature and purpose of the experimentation to be conducted, the nature of the experimental signal to be transmitted, and the proposed schedule of hours and duration of the experimentation.
( c ) Experimental operations for licensed broadcast stations are subject to the following conditions: ( 1 ) The authorized power of the station may not be exceeded more than 5 percent above the maximum power specified, except as specifically authorized for the experimental operations.
( 2 ) Emissions outside the authorized bandwidth must be attenuated to the degree required for the particular type of station.
( 3 ) The experimental operations may be conducted at any time the licensed station is authorized to operate, but the minimum required schedule of programming for the class and type of station must be met. AM stations also may conduct experimental operations during the experimental period (12 midnight local time to local sunrise) and at additional hours if permitted by the experimental authorization provided no interference is caused to other stations maintaining a regular operating schedule within such period(s).
( 4 ) If a licensed station's experimental authorization permits the use of additional facilities or hours of operation for experimental purposes, no sponsored programs or commercial announcements may be transmitted during such experimentation.
( 5 ) The licensee may transmit regularly scheduled programming concurrently with the experimental transmission if there is no significant impairment of service.
( 6 ) No charges may be made, either directly or indirectly, for the experimentation; however, normal charges may be made for regularly scheduled programming transmitted concurrently with the experimental transmissions.
( d ) The FCC may request a report of the research, experimentation and results at the conclusion of the experimental operation.
[78 FR 25162, Apr. 29, 2013, as amended at 84 FR 2758, Feb. 8, 2019]
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"2018-1434: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp v. West-Ward Pharmaceuticals - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"7Qe5cDGrr9\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/12-03-2018-2018-1434-novartis-pharmaceuticals-corp-v-west-ward-pharmaceuticals-audio-uploaded\/\">2018-1434: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp v. West-Ward Pharmaceuticals<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/12-03-2018-2018-1434-novartis-pharmaceuticals-corp-v-west-ward-pharmaceuticals-audio-uploaded\/embed\/#?secret=7Qe5cDGrr9\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“2018-1434: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp v. West-Ward Pharmaceuticals” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"7Qe5cDGrr9\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Oral argument audio posted: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp v. West-Ward Pharmaceuticals (mp3) Appeal Number: 2018-1434 To listen to more oral argument recordings, follow this link: Listen To Oral Arguments."}
69–008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 106–92

WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H. CON. RES. 68, THE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION ON THE

BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEARS 2000–2009

APRIL 14 (legislative day APRIL 13), 1999.—Referred to the House Calendar and

ordered to be printed

Mr. LINDER, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 137]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 137, by a non-record vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION

The resolution waives all points of order against the conference

report on H. Con. Res. 68, the concurrent resolution on the budget

for fiscal years 2000 through 2009, and against its consideration.

The rule provides that the conference report be considered as read.

The rule further provides one hour of debate on the conference report, divided equally between the chairman and ranking minority

member of the Committee on the Budget.

The blanket waiver includes a waiver of clause 4(a) of Rule XIII

(requiring a three-day layover of the committee report). The conference report will be filed on Tuesday, April 13, and is scheduled

for consideration on the floor as early as Wednesday, April 14.

Æ
#### § 73.132 Territorial exclusivity.

No licensee of an AM broadcast station shall have any arrangement with a network organization which prevents or hinders another station serving substantially the same area from broadcasting the network's programs not taken by the former station, or which prevents or hinders another station serving a substantially different area from broadcasting any program of the network organization: *Provided, however,* That this section does not prohibit arrangements under which the station is granted first call within its primary service area upon the network's programs. The term “network organization” means any organization originating program material, with or without commercial messages, and furnishing the same to stations interconnected so as to permit simultaneous broadcast by all or some of them. However, arrangements involving only stations under common ownership, or only the rebroadcast by one station or programming from another with no compensation other than a lump-sum payment by the station rebroadcasting, are not considered arrangements with a network organization. The term “arrangement” means any contract, arrangement or understanding, expressed or implied.

[42 FR 16422, Mar. 28, 1977]