alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w28



 





EXHIBIT 10.28




Signature Page to the Stock Option Agreement Terms and Conditions (rev. 2006)

(executive officers)




Complete Production Services, Inc.

Amended and Restated 2001 Stock Incentive Plan




	 	 	 
	[Executive Name]

	 	[Street Address]
	Optionee’s Tax ID #: [SSN]

	 	[City, State, Zip, Country]





Complete Production Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), pursuant to its Amended
and Restated 2001 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), hereby grants to you (“Executive”), an option
to purchase the shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01, as set forth below
(“Option”) and subject to the terms and conditions contained in the Stock Option Agreement Terms
and Conditions (Rev. 2006) and the Plan.




	 	 	 	 	 
	Option Grant Date:
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 

	 	 
	 
	Total Shares Subject to the Option:

	 	shares	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 
	Exercise Price per Share:

	 	$	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 
	Total Exercise Price:

	 	$	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 
	Expiration Date**:
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 
	Type of Option:
	 	 	 	 





o Incentive Stock Option, up to the maximum number permitted by the Code and non-qualified
options as to all other shares



o Non-Qualified Stock Option as to all shares




Vesting
Schedule**:

This Option will vest and become exercisable in increments on the following dates, provided you are

still an employee on that date:




	 	 	 
	Shares	 	Vest Date
	 

	 	___/___/___
	 

	 	___/___/___
	 

	 	___/___/___
	 

	 	 





 




**This Option will not vest and the option exercise period will expire sooner than shown under
certain circumstances, including your Termination of Employment. See the Stock Option Agreement
Terms and Conditions (Rev. 2006). Notwithstanding the terms set forth
in the Stock Option Agreement Terms and Conditions (Rev. 2006), in the event of your Termination of Employment due to
retirement (as determined by the Administrator), you shall have one year following such retirement
to exercise your vested Options.




You and the Company agree that this Option is granted under and governed by the terms and
conditions of the Stock Option Agreement Terms and Conditions (Rev. 2006), the Plan and this
Signature Page, which together are a binding agreement. You acknowledge that you have read,
understand and agree to be bound by the Stock Option Agreement Terms and Conditions(Rev. 2006),
this Signature Page and the Plan, including the provisions governing the resolution of all disputes
between you and the Company through arbitration, the vesting and termination of your Options, the
exercise procedures, and the other restrictions contained therein.




	 	 	 	 	 
	COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.

	 	EXECUTIVE	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

Name:

	 	 

[Executive Name]
	 	 
	Title:
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

LOUIS JACK STALEY

, Appellant,

v.

BONNIE STALEY

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 3211

[ April 1, 2021 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Dale C. Cohen , Judge; L.T. Case No. FMCE160005272

(37) (98)

.

Angelena M. Conant of Angelena M. Root, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for

appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

L EVINE

, C.J., M AY and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 10-11118.

#### Hageon *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration 

# AGENCY:

International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. 

# ACTION:

Notice of an open conference call meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The U.S. Travel and Tourism Advisory Board (Board) will hold an open conference call meeting to discuss topics related to the travel and tourism industry. The Board was established on October 1, 2003, and reconstituted October 1, 2005, to advise the Secretary of Commerce on matters relating to the travel and tourism industry. 

# DATES:

August 23, 2006. 

*Time:*                         TBD.                     

*For the Conference Call-In Number and Further Information Contact:*                         The U.S. Travel and Tourism Advisory Board Executive Secretariat, Room 4043, Washington, DC, 20230, telephone: 202-482-4501, e-mail:                         *Marc.Chittum@mail.doc.gov.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        J. Marc Chittum, U.S. Travel and Tourism Advisory Board, Room 4043, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, 20230, telephone: 202-482-4501, e-mail:                         *Marc.Chittum@mail.doc.gov.*

Dated: August 4, 2006. 

J. Marc Chittum, 

Executive Secretary, U.S. Travel and Tourism Advisory Board. 

[FR Doc. 06-6842 Filed 8-7-06; 3:34 pm] 

BILLING CODE 3510-DR-P
No. 11-5626.

#### Brown *v.*Pierce, Warden.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

        We consent to the use of our report dated January 13, 1997 in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Connective Therapeutics, Inc. (also known as
Connetics Corporation) for the year ended December 31, 1996.

        We also consent to the incorporation by reference to the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-04985) pertaining to the 1995 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, 1994 Stock Plan and 1995 Director Stock Option Plan of
Connective Therapeutics, Inc. (also known as Connetics Corporation), of our
report dated January 13, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Connective Therapeutics, Inc. (also known as Connectics
Corporation) included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1996.

                                        ERNST & YOUNG, LLP

Palo Alto, California
March 14, 1997
EXHIBIT 32.1




Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (this “report”), of SPAR Group, Inc. (the “registrant”), the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:




1.           The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and




2.           The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.




/s/ Gary S. RaymondGary S. RaymondChief Executive OfficerNovember 19, 2010









A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SPAR Group, Inc. and will be retained by SPAR Group, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Naval Postgraduate School

/ Published Nov. 27, 2023

Paper info.
No. 11-5503.

#### Shivers *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Filed 6/28/22 G.T. v. Madera County Dept. of Social Services etc. CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or or dered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

G.T.,
Petitioner and Appellant,

v.

MADERA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES/CHILD WELFARE SERVICES et al.,

Respondents. F082701
(Super. Ct. No. MJP01 8664 )



### OPINION

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Madera County. Thomas L. Bender, Judge. Munger Tolles & Olson, Jordan D. Segall and Lloyd S. Marshall; University of

California at Irvine School of Law, Susan E. Seager and Jack Lerner for Petitioner and Appellant. Regina A. Garza, County Counsel, and Christopher B. Dorian, for Respondent Madera County Department of Social Services/Child Welfare Services. Beth A. Sears, under appoin tment of the Court of Appeal, for Respondent D .S.

- ooOoo

-2

.

In this proceeding, G.T. appeals from the juvenile court’s order denying his petition to obtain the juvenile case file of D.S., a deceased child, under Welfare and Institutions Code section 827, sub division (a)(2). G.T. argues the juvenile court erred in denying his petition because it: (1) failed to hold a hearing; (2) considered impermissible factors when deciding whether to release D.S.’s records; (3) found D.S. had no juvenile

case file because a dependency petition had not been filed on her behalf; and (4) failed to make factual findings to support its denial of his request. G.T asks us to reverse the juvenile court’s order and either order release of the D.S. case file or remand the matter to the juvenile court for it to review his petition under the proper standards. After G.T. filed this appeal, he filed a petition for writ of mandate or prohibition, in which he made the same arguments as in this appeal and sought to compel the juvenile

cour t to vacate its order denying his petition and either enter an order granting the petition or remand for a hearing under the proper standards. We recently issued an opinion in the writ proceeding, in which we granted the writ petition and ordered

issuance of a peremptory writ of mandate directing the juvenile court to vacate its order denying the petition and hold a hearing on G.T.’s request for the disclosure of D.S.’s juvenile case file. ( Therolf v. Superior Court (June 28 , 2022, F082993) [nonpub. opn.].) Since we have granted the relief G.T. seeks in this appeal, there is no further relief we may grant. Therefore, we dismiss this appeal as moot.3

. DISPOSITION The appeal is dismissed as moot. 1

MEEHAN , J.

WE CONCUR:

LEVY , Acting P. J.

POOCHIGIAN , J.

1 Appellant’s request for judicial notice, filed on July 12, 2021, is denied as moot. Respondent D.S.’s request for judicial notice, filed August 25, 2021, is denied as moot.
69–008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 106–55

PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 975, REDUCING THE VOLUME OF STEEL IMPORTS AND ESTABLISHING A STEEL IMPORT NOTIFICATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM

MARCH 16, 1999.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. DREIER, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 114]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 114, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 975, ‘‘Reducing the Volume of Steel Imports and Establishing a Steel Import

Notification and Monitoring Program,’’ under a closed rule. The

rule waives all points of order against consideration of the bill.

The rule further provides ninety minutes of debate in the House

divided equally between the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means. Finally, the rule provides for one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

The waiver of all points of order includes the following points of

order which would lie against consideration of the bill. First, the

bill violates Section 311(a) of the Congressional Budget Act (prohibiting consideration of legislation or an amendment that would

cause the total level of new budget authority or outlays in the most

recent budget resolution to be exceeded or would cause revenues to

be less). According to the Congressional Budget Office cost estimate, if enacted, H.R. 975 would cause revenues to be reduced by

$500,000 in fiscal year 1999, and by $43 million over the 1999

through 2004 period. Consequently, revenue levels would be below

those assumed in the budget process for FY 1999. Secondly, the bill

violates clause 4(a) of Rule XIII (requiring a three-day layover of
2

the committee report). The report was filed on Monday, March 15,

and the bill may be considered as early as Wednesday, March 17.

Æ
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 241 (Monday, December 16, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76140-76141]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-29789]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Extension of Public Comment Period for the Champlain Hudson Power 
Express Transmission Line Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Extension of the public comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is extending the public 
comment period for the Champlain Hudson Power Express Transmission Line 
Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0447). The Draft 
EIS evaluates the environmental impacts of DOE's proposed Federal 
action of issuing a Presidential permit to the Applicant, Champlain 
Hudson Power Express, Inc. (CHPEI), to construct, operate, maintain, 
and connect a new electric transmission line across the U.S./Canada 
border in northeastern New York State.

DATES: The ongoing public comment period which opened on November 1, 
2013, will remain open until January 15, 2014, an extension of 30 days.

[[Page 76141]]

ADDRESSES: Written comments on the Draft EIS may be provided on the 
CHPE EIS Web site at http://www.chpexpresseis.org (preferred) or 
addressed to Mr. Brian Mills, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy 
Reliability (OE-20), U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence 
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585; by electronic mail to 
Brian.Mills@hq.doe.gov; or by facsimile to 202-318-7761.
    Availability of the Draft EIS: Copies of the Draft EIS have been 
distributed to appropriate members of Congress, state and local 
government officials, American Indian tribal governments, and other 
Federal agencies, groups, and interested parties. Printed copies of the 
document may be obtained by contacting Mr. Mills at the above address. 
Copies of the Draft EIS and supporting documents are also available for 
inspection at the following locations:

 Queens Library--Steinway, 21-45 31 Street (Ditmars Boulevard), 
Long Island City, NY 11102
 Yonkers Public Library--Riverfront Library, 1 Larkin Center, 
Yonkers, New York 10701
 Rose Memorial Library, 79 East Main Street, Stony Point, NY 
10980
 Kingston Public Library, 55 Franklin Street, Kingston, NY 
12401
 Schenectady County Public Library, 99 Clinton Street, 
Schenectady, NY 12305
 Crandall Public Library, 251 Glen Street, Glens Falls, NY 
12801
 Plattsburgh Public Library, 19 Oak Street, Plattsburgh, NY 
12901

    The Draft EIS is also available on the EIS Web site at http://chpexpresseis.org and on the DOE NEPA Web site at http://nepa.energy.gov/.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 11, 2013.
Brian Mills,
NEPA Compliance Officer, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy 
Reliability.
[FR Doc. 2013-29789 Filed 12-13-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly report of Lipidviro Tech, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report), I, Kenneth Hamik, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  Date:May 15, 2008By:/s/Kenneth HamikKenneth Hamik, Presiden and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 153 (Wednesday, August 9, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45579-45580]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6775]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Institute of Electrical and Electronics 
Engineers

    Notice is hereby given that, on July 6, 2006, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Institute of Electrical

[[Page 45580]]

and Electronics Engineers (``IEEE'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing additions or changes to its standards development 
activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, two new 
standards have been initiated and two existing standards are being 
revised. More detail regarding these changes can be found at http://standards.ieee.org/standardswire/sba/05-25-06.html.
    On September 17, 2004, IEEE filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on November 3, 2004 (69 FR 64105).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 24, 
2006. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 69b) of the Act on May 22, 2006 (71 FR 29354).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 06-6775 Filed 8-8-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
§ 32.6421 Aerial cable expense. ( a ) This account shall include expenses associated with aerial cable.
( b ) Subsidiary record categories shall be maintained as provided in § 32.2421(a) of subpart C.
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. MICHAEL SCOTT HAMILTON

No. 124PA15

Filed 18 December 2015

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous, unpublished decision of the Court of Appeals,_N.C. App._, 772 S.E.2d 13 (2015), finding no error in part, but vacating defendant’s convictions after appeal from judgments entered on 27 March 2014 by Judge W. Russell Duke, Jr. in Superior Court, Halifax County, remanding for resentencing in part, and ordering that defendant receive a new trial in part. Heard in the Supreme Court on 7 December 2015.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellant.

Staples S. Hughes, Appellate Defender,1 by Benjamin Dowling-Sendor, Assistant Appellate Defender, for defendant-appellee.

1

. Defendant’s new brief was filed on 29 October 2015. Effective 1 November 2015, Glenn Gerding succeeded Staples S. Hughes as Appellate Defender.

PER CURIAM.

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 462 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 462

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a permanent 
            extension of the mortgage revenue bond program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 1993

 Mrs. Kennelly (for herself, Mr. Shays, and Mr. Gejdenson) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 
                                 Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a permanent 
            extension of the mortgage revenue bond program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF MORTGAGE REVENUE BOND PROGRAM.

    (a) General Rule.--Paragraph (1) of section 143(a) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (defining qualified mortgage bond) is amended to 
read as follows:
            ``(1) Qualified mortgage bond defined.--For purposes of 
        this title, the term `qualified mortgage bond' means a bond 
        which is issued as part of a qualified mortgage issue.''
    (b) Mortgage Credit Certificates.--Section 25 of such Code is 
amended by striking subsection (h) and redesignating subsection (i) as 
subsection (h).
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on July 1, 1992.

                                 <all>
```