alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 45842)    
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting  will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections  552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential  trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals  associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of  personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel Augmenting Language Therapy for Aphasia Recovery: a Multi-Site Clinical Trial.                    

*Date:*                         August 21, 2006.                    

*Time:*                         10 a.m. to 12 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Room 5B01, Rockville, MD 20852.(Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Anne Krey, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health, and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-6908.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS.)

Dated: July 27, 2006.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 06-6831  Filed 8-9-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
No. 11-5515.

#### Palmer *v.*Buge et al.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Petition for Exemption 14 CFR 11.81

Craig Beebe: 2627 N. Ridgewood Dr. Wichita, KS 67220 (316) 265-1105

 I am a wedding cinematographer. Using an aerial shot of the church or venue adds 

a high-end production quality to my work. I would never fly during a ceremony or around large groups

of people. My goal is to capture an establishing shot from above

so the viewer can see where the wedding will take place. The flight can be done early

in the morning before any guests arrive. I will never need to fly above 200’ and would never need to fly

over any buildings or structures. I plan to fly in an empty parking lot close to the church or venue.

Also, many of our weddings are located in rural areas such as farms and private building structures

with several acres of surrounding land.

 Using a few aerial shots in our work helps to tell the story of the bride and grooms day. Our

customers appreciate the big budget look of aerial videography. I believe I will not affect the safety of

the community. The drone will be used responsibly and for very short periods of time. I can usually get

the shot I need and be back on the ground within 4-5 minutes. The best aerial shots of a church/

venue are usually captured at low altitudes. Somewhere between 75’ and 150’. I would never have a

reason to go above these altitudes. 

 In summary, I hope to fly my Phantom Vision Plus 2 for commercial use for wedding

cinematography. My registration number is: FA3PYAYEX7. I will maintain safe practices and follow all

rules and regulations of the FAA. In my opinion hobbyist are much more of a threat. Working

professionals have much more to lose. Flying irresponsibly could jeopardize my business which I have

devoted my life to building.

Thank you for your consideration.

Craig Beebe
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Cedar Lakes to Espiritu SantoBay, Texas [electronic resource]**
 
SuDoc Number:C 55.418/7:11319/

Item Number:0191-B-13 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000881235
 
1974-1975 | 1976-1977 | 1978-1979 | 1981-1982
 
May 4, 2020
#### § 54.1712 Duplicate support.

Entities participating in the Emergency Connectivity Fund may not seek Emergency Connectivity Fund support or reimbursement for eligible equipment or services that have been purchased with or reimbursed in full from other Federal pandemic-relief funding, targeted state funding, other external sources of targeted funding or targeted gifts, or eligible for discounts from the schools and libraries universal service support mechanism or other universal service support mechanisms.
No. 11-5603.

#### Neal *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certio-rari denied.
No. 11-657.

#### Commissioner of Internal Revenue *v.*Equipment Holding Co., LLC, et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲

▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

07/18

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jul 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★ ■

■

■

■

●

★

●

●

●

★

●

●

●

●
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.9040 Contractual requirements applicable to spectrum leasing arrangements. ( a ) Agreements between licensees and spectrum lessees concerning spectrum leasing arrangements entered into pursuant to the rules of this subpart must contain the following provisions: ( 1 ) The spectrum lessee must comply at all times with applicable rules set forth in this chapter and other applicable law, and the spectrum leasing arrangement may be revoked, cancelled, or terminated by the licensee or Commission if the spectrum lessee fails to comply with the applicable requirements;
( 2 ) If the license is revoked, cancelled, terminated, or otherwise ceases to be in effect, the spectrum lessee has no continuing authority or right to use the leased spectrum unless otherwise authorized by the Commission;
( 3 ) The spectrum leasing arrangement is not an assignment, sale, or transfer of the license itself;
( 4 ) The spectrum leasing arrangement shall not be assigned to any entity that is ineligible or unqualified to enter into a spectrum leasing arrangement under the applicable rules as set forth in this subpart;
( 5 ) The licensee shall not consent to an assignment of a spectrum leasing arrangement unless such assignment complies with applicable Commission rules and regulations.
( b ) Agreements between licensees that hold licenses subject to the Commission's installment payment program (*see* § 1.2110 of subpart Q of this part and related service-specific rules) and spectrum lesseeys must contain the following additional provisions: ( 1 ) The express acknowledgement that the license remains subject to the Commission's priority lien and security interest in the license and related proceeds, consistent with the provisions set forth in § 1.9045; and
( 2 ) The agreement that the spectrum lessee shall not hold itself out to the public as the holder of the license and shall not hold itself out as a licensee by virtue of its having entered into a spectrum leasing arrangement.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4577

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located

at 242 East Main Street in Bowling Green, Kentucky, as the ‘‘William

H. Natcher Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 14, 1994

Mr. TRAFICANT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Public Works and Transportation

A BILL

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 242 East Main Street in Bowling Green,

Kentucky, as the ‘‘William H. Natcher Federal Building

and United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Federal building and United States courthouse

5 located at 242 East Main Street in Bowling Green, Ken6 tucky, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘William H.

7 Natcher Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.
2

•HR 4577 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

4 building and United States courthouse referred to in sec5 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘William

6 H. Natcher Federal Building and United States Court7 house’’.

Æ
§ 15.111 Antenna power conduction limits for receivers. ( a ) In addition to the radiated emission limits, receivers that operate (tune) in the frequency range 30 to 960 MHz and CB receivers that provide terminals for the connection of an external receiving antenna may be tested to demonstrate compliance with the provisions of § 15.109 with the antenna terminals shielded and terminated with a resistive termination equal to the impedance specified for the antenna, provided these receivers also comply with the following: With the receiver antenna terminal connected to a resistive termination equal to the impedance specified or employed for the antenna, the power at the antenna terminal at any frequency within the range of measurements specified in § 15.33 shall not exceed 2.0 nanowatts.
( b ) CB receivers and receivers that operate (tune) in the frequency range 30 to 960 MHz that are provided only with a permanently attached antenna shall comply with the radiated emission limitations in this part, as measured with the antenna attached.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Justin HARRIS, Appellant.

No. 03-3473.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted March 4, 2004.

Decided March 25, 2004.

Matthew J. Cole, Cedar Rapids, IA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Justin Harris, Oklahoma City, OK, pro se.

Timothy McCarthy, II, McEnroe & McCarthy, West Des Moines, IA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before MELLOY, HANSEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

COLLOTON, Circuit Judge.

Justin Harris pleaded guilty to possession of a firearm as an unlawful user of controlled substances, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(3) and 924(a)(2), and the district court1 sentenced him to 14 months imprisonment and 2 years supervised release. On appeal, counsel has moved to withdraw under *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and has filed a brief in which he raises the validity of Harris’s guilty plea and the length of Harris’s sentence.

We find no merit in the issues raised in counsel’s brief. Based on our review of the record, we conclude that the district court complied with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 in taking Harris’s guilty plea, and that the sentence imposed is not subject to review, because it is within a properly determined sentencing guideline range. *See*18 U.S.C. § 3742; *United States v. Smotherman,*326 F.3d 988, 989 (8th Cir.) (per curiam), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 293, 157 L.Ed.2d 203 (2003).

Following our independent review, *see Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfriv-olous issues. Accordingly, we affirm and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

1

. The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.
#### § 400.11 Waiver authority.

It is the general intent of the ICO not to waive any of the provisions set forth in this part. However, under extraordinary circumstances and when it is in the best interest of the federal government, the ICO, upon its own initiative or when requested, may waive the provisions in this part. Waivers may only be granted for requirements that are discretionary and not mandated by statute or other applicable law. Any request for a waiver must set forth the extraordinary circumstances for the request.

[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER03AU18.003/ER03AU18.003_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER03AU18.003/ER03AU18.003_original_size.png)
[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER03AU18.004/ER03AU18.004_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER03AU18.004/ER03AU18.004_original_size.png)
[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER03AU18.005/ER03AU18.005_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER03AU18.005/ER03AU18.005_original_size.png)
[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER03AU18.006/ER03AU18.006_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER03AU18.006/ER03AU18.006_original_size.png)
[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER03AU18.007/ER03AU18.007_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER03AU18.007/ER03AU18.007_original_size.png)
[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER03AU18.008/ER03AU18.008_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER03AU18.008/ER03AU18.008_original_size.png)
547 S.E.2d 558

#### Kevin Michael POTTS, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia, Appellee.

Record No. 2854-99-1.

Court of Appeals of Virginia.

June 26, 2001.

Before FITZPATRICK, C.J., and BENTON, WILLIS, ELDER, BRAY, ANNUNZIATA, BUMGARDNER, FRANK, CLEMENTS and AGEE, JJ.

UPON A PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

On June 5, 2001 came Kevin Michael Potts, the appellant, by court-appointed counsel, and filed a petition praying that the Court set aside the judgment rendered herein on May 22, 2001, and grant a rehearing *en banc*thereof.

On consideration whereof, the petition for rehearing *en banc*is granted, the mandate entered herein on May 22, 2001 is stayed pending the decision of the Court *en banc,*and the appeal is reinstated on the docket of this Court.

The parties shall file briefs in compliance with Rule 5A:35. The appellant shall attach as an addendum to the opening brief upon rehearing *en banc*a copy of the opinion previously rendered by the Court in this matter. It is further ordered that the appellant shall file with the clerk of this Court twelve additional copies of the appendix previously filed in this case.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

AZIZ M. MAALI, a.k.a. Ozzi, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-50319 

D.C. No. 2:15-cr-00561-SJO 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

S. James Otero, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 15, 2018**

Before: SILVERMAN, BEA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Aziz M. Maali appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his 

guilty-plea conviction and 12-month-and-one-day sentence for structuring 

transactions to evade reporting requirements, in violation of 31 U.S.C. 

§ 5324(a)(3), (d)(2). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAY 18 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-50319 

Maali’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along 

with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Maali the 

opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or

answering brief has been filed. 

Maali waived his right to appeal his conviction, with the exception of an 

appeal based on a claim that his plea was involuntary. Our independent review of 

the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no 

arguable grounds for relief as to the voluntariness of Maali’s plea. We therefore 

affirm as to that issue and dismiss the remainder of the appeal of his conviction.

Maali also waived the right to appeal most aspects of his sentence. We 

dismiss Maali’s sentencing appeal as to those aspects of his sentence that are 

covered by the waiver and affirm as to all other issues except as to the three 

supervised release conditions, standard conditions five, six, and fourteen, which 

are unconstitutionally vague. See United States v. Evans, 883 F.3d 1154, 1162-64 

(9th Cir. 2018); see also United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974 (9th Cir. 2009) (an 

appeal waiver does not bar a constitutional challenge to a supervised release 

condition). We remand for the district court to modify these conditions consistent 

with our opinion in Evans.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part; REMANDED with 

instructions.
###### Editorial Note on [Subpart H of Part 51](/current/title-47/part-51/subpart-H?toc=1)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subpart H of part 51 appear at [66 FR 26806](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/66-FR-26806), May 15, 2001.

#### § 51.700 Purpose of this subpart.

The purpose of this subpart, as revised in 2011 by FCC 11-161 is to establish rules governing the transition of intercarrier compensation from a calling-party's-network pays system to a default bill-and-keep methodology. Following the transition, the exchange of telecommunications traffic between and among service providers will, by default, be governed by bill-and-keep arrangements.

Note to [§ 51.700](/on/2024-09-20/title-47/section-51.700):

See FCC 11-161, figure 9 (chart identifying steps in the transition).

[[76 FR 73854](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/76-FR-73854), Nov. 29, 2011]
par- OS-r-Z003-'li-T-B3

CLINTON COUNTY LEGISLATURE

Clinton County Government Center

137 Margaret Street, Suite 208

Plattsburgh, NY 12901

James R. Langley, Jr.

Chairperson

February 4, 2010

U.S. Department ofTransportation

ATTN: Mr. Dennis J. DeVany, Chief

Essential Air Service Division

Office ofAviation Analysis

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington DC 20590

Re: Recommendation regarding Essential Air Service at Plattsburgh, New York

Dear Mr. DeVany:

Clinton County has thoroughly reviewed the three proposals received in response to Order 2009-12-24,

requesting proposals under the Essenthll Air Service (EAS) Program at Plattsburgh, New York. In

addition, the matter has generated significant community interest, and Clinton County Legislators have

received substantial input from local residents and businesses.

After considering several factors for evaluating the airlines submitting a proposal (including service

reliability, fares, size of aircraft, frequency ofservice, connectivity at Logan International Airport, airline

alliances, and others) the Clinton County Legislature is formally endorsing Colgan Air, Inc. for service at

Plattsburgh under the Essential Air Service Program. We believe Colgan Air, Inc. best matches the

needs ofour community for commuter flights from Plattsburgh International Airport at this time.

In selecting Colgan Air, Inc., the Clinton County Legislature also respectfully states that it is not willing

to waive the minimum fifteen seat requirement for EAS to Plattsburgh for the new term, as service

offering larger aircraft are a better fit for our current needs.

Weare grateful for the excellent service provided by Cape Air over the past two years, and are looking

forward to the new opportunities presented by Colgan Air, Inc. at Plattsburgh.

Telephone (518) 565-4600 Fax (518) 565-4616
DeVany Letter

February 4, 2010

Page 2

Thank you for consideration of our request. Please contact me or our County Administrator Michael

Zurlo ifyou have any questions regarding our request or any other elements ofthis letter.

Sincerely,

James R. Langley, Jr., Chairperson

Clinton County Legislature

cc: Michael Zurlo, County Administrator

Tom Long, PBG Airport Manager

Telephone (518) 565-4600 Fax (518) 565-4616
Exhibit








FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
KNOWLES CORPORATION
SENIOR EXECUTIVE CHANGE-IN-CONTROL SEVERANCE PLAN


WHEREAS, Knowles Corporation (the “Company”) maintains the Knowles Corporation Senior Executive Change-in-Control Severance Plan (the “Plan”); and
WHEREAS, the Company wishes to amend the Plan’s eligibility provisions so that those executives who report directly to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer are eligible to participate in the Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, by virtue and in exercise of the amending authority reserved to the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company under Article 11 of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of May 5, 2015, as follows:
		
	1.
	Article 1.a. of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:


		
	a.
	Eligible Executives.  Those executives who are eligible to participate in the Plan and to receive Severance Payments thereunder are (i) the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Knowles, Business Unit Presidents, those executives who report directly to the Chief Executive Officer of Knowles, and those Vice Presidents of Knowles who are designated as eligible by the Chief Executive Officer of Knowles from time to time; provided, however, that such executives (A) are employed in the United States or are a U.S.-based employee temporarily assigned to the non-U.S. payroll of a Subsidiary on an expatriate assignment, and (B) remain in such a position on the date of a “Change of Control” (as defined in Article 14) (such executives who meet the above eligibility requirements, the “Eligible Executives”).
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CHINA MOBILITY SOLUTIONS, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"). I, Angela
Du, President and CEO of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge and belief.

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
            or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                         /s/ Angela Du
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Angela Du, President/CEO
Dated:  08/20/04