U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                  FORM 10-KSB
                [X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                    FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2002
                                       or
                [ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                          Concierge Technologies, Inc.
                          ----------------------------
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
        (Previous name of Starfest, Inc. was changed on March 20, 2002)


  California                        333-38838                       95-4442384
  ----------                        ---------                       ----------
  (state of                  (Commission File Number)             (IRS Employer
incorporation)                                                     I.D. Number)

                          22048 Sherman Way, Suite 303
                              Canoga Park, CA 91303
                                 (818) 610-0310
            -------------------------------------------------------
            (Address and telephone number of registrant's principal
               executive offices and principal place of business)


                              531 Main Street, #963
                              El Segundo, CA 90245
                                 (310) 645-1582
             ------------------------------------------------------
             (Former name or address, if changed since last report)

         Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

                           Title of each class: None.

                Name of each exchange on which registered: None.

         Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

                         Common Stock, $0.001 par value
                         ------------------------------
                                (Title of class)


<PAGE>

     Check  whether  the  issuer  (1)  filed all reports required to be filed by
Section  13  or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such
shorter  period  that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes [X] No [
]

     Check  if  there  is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item
405  of  Regulation S-B is not contained in this form, and no disclosure will be
contained,  to  the  best  of  registrant's  knowledge,  in  definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB
or  any  amendment  to  this  Form  10-KSB.  [X]

State  issuer's  revenues  for  its  most  recent  fiscal  year:  None.

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held
by  non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity
was  sold,  or  the  average  bid and asked price of such common equity, as of a
specified date within the past 60 days:  $1,112,461 computed by reference to the
$0.017  average  of  the  bid  and  asked price of the Company's Common Stock on
October  3,  2002.

     State  the  number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of
common  equity,  as of the latest practicable date: 126,292,749 shares of Common
Stock,  $0.001  par  value,  on  April  8,  2002.

DOCUMENTS  INCORPORATED  BY  REFERENCE

     If  the following documents are incorporated by reference, briefly describe
them and identify the part of the Form 10-KSB (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) into
which  the  document is incorporated: (1) any annual report to security holders;
(3) any proxy or information statement; and (3) any prospectus filed pursuant to
Rule  424(b)  or (c) of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act").  The list
documents  should be clearly described for identification purposes (e.g., annual
report  to  security  holders  for fiscal year ended December 24, 1990).   None.

     Transitional  Small  Business Disclosure Format (check one): Yes [ ] No [X]

























                                       ii
<PAGE>
                                TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                                            Page
                                                                            ----
Item  1.   Description  of  Business                                          1
           Business  Development                                              1
           Business  of  Concierge  Technologies                              2
                Government  Approval  of  Principal  Products                 2
                Government  Regulations                                       3
                Dependence  on  Major  Customers                              3
                Seasonality                                                   3
                Research  and  Development                                    3
                Environmental  Controls                                       3
                Patents,  Trademarks,  Copyrights  and
                  Intellectual  Property                                      3
                Number  of  Employees                                         3

Item  2.   Description  of  Property                                          3
           Facilities                                                         3

Item  3.   Legal  Proceedings                                                 3

Item  4.   Submission  of  Matters  to  a  Vote  of  Security
                Holders                                                       4

Item  5.   Market  for  Common  Equity  and  Related  Stockholder
                Matters                                                       4
           Holders                                                            5
           Rule  144  and  Rule  145  Restrictions  on Trading                5
           Dividends                                                          6
           Penny  Stock  Regulations                                          7
                The  Penny  Stock  Suitability  Rule                          7
                The  Penny  Stock  Disclosure  Rule                           8
                Effects  of  the  Rule                                        9
           Recent  Sales  of  Unregistered  Securities                        9

Item  6.   Plan  of  Operations                                              10
           Liquidity                                                         11

Item  7.   Financial  Statements                                             12

Item  8.   Changes  in  and  Disagreements  With  Accountants  On
                Accounting  and  Financial  Disclosure                       27

Item  9.    Directors,  Executive  Officers,  Promoters  and
                 Control  Persons;  Compliance  with
                 Section  16(a)  of  the  Exchange  Act                      27
                 Section  16(a)  Beneficial  Ownership
                      Reporting  Compliance                                  28

Item  10.   Executive  Compensation                                          28
            Long-Term  Compensation                                          29

Item  11.   Security  Ownership  of  Certain  Beneficial  Owners
                 and  Management                                             29

Item  12.   Certain Relationships and Related Transactions                   30

                                      iii
<PAGE>

Item  13.   Exhibits  and  Reports  on  Form 8-K                             31
            (a)     Exhibits                                                 31
            (b)     Reports  on  Form  8-K                                   31

Signatures                                                                   32



































                                       iv
<PAGE>
ITEM  1.     DESCRIPTION  OF  BUSINESS

Business  Development

     Concierge  Technologies,  Inc. was incorporated in California on August 18,
1993  as  "Fanfest,  Inc."  On August 29, 1995 its name was changed to Starfest,
Inc.,  and  on  March  20, 2002 its name was changed to "Concierge Technologies,
Inc."

     Pursuant  to  a  Stock  Purchase Agreement (the "Purchase Agreement") dated
March 6, 2000 between MAS Capital, Inc., an Indiana corporation, the controlling
shareholder  of MAS Acquisition XX Corp. ("MAS XX"), an Indiana corporation, and
Starfest,  approximately  96.83  percent  (8,250,000  shares) of the outstanding
shares  of  common stock of MAS Acquisition XX Corp. were exchanged for $100,000
and  150,000  shares  of  common  stock  of  Starfest  in a transaction in which
Starfest  became  the  parent  corporation  of  MAS  XX.

     At  the  time  of  this  transaction, the market price of Starfest's common
stock  was  $1.50  bid  at  closing  on March 7, 2000 on the OTC Bulletin Board.
Accordingly,  the consideration Starfest paid for the 96.83 percent interest was
valued  at  $325,000.  Concierge loaned to Starfest the $100,000 cash portion of
the consideration evidenced by a no-interest, demand note.  Michael Huemmer, the
president  of Starfest, loaned to Starfest the 150,000 shares of common stock of
Starfest  that  was  the  stock  portion  of  the  consideration.

     Upon  execution  of  the  Purchase Agreement and the subsequent delivery of
$100,000  cash  and 150,000 shares of common stock of Starfest on March 7, 2000,
to  MAS  Capital  Inc.,  pursuant  to  Rule  12g-3(a)  of  the General Rules and
Regulations  of  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission, Starfest became the
successor  issuer  to  MAS Acquisition XX Corp. for reporting purposes under the
Securities  and  Exchange  Act  of  1934  and  elected  to  report under the Act
effective  March  7,  2000.

     MAS  XX  had  no business, no assets, and no liabilities at the time of the
transaction.  Starfest  entered  into  the transaction solely for the purpose of
becoming the successor issuer to MAS Acquisition XX Corp. for reporting purposes
under  the 1934 Exchange Act.  Prior to this transaction, Starfest was preparing
to  register  its  common  stock  with  the  Commission  in order to avoid being
delisted  by  the  OTC  Bulletin  Board.   By  engaging  in  the  Rule  12g-3(a)
transaction,  Starfest  avoided  the  possibility  that its planned registration
statement  with  the  Commission would not be fully reviewed by the Commission's
staff  before  an  April  2000 deadline, which would result in Starfest's common
stock  being  delisted  on  the  OTC  Bulletin  Board.

     An  agreement  of  merger  was entered into between Starfest and Concierge,
Inc.,  a  Nevada  corporation,  on  January  26,  2000.  The proposed merger was
submitted  to  the  shareholders of each of Starfest and Concierge pursuant to a
Form  S-4  Prospectus-Proxy  Statement  filed  with  the  Commission.


                                        1
<PAGE>
     As  described  in  Starfest's  Form  8-K  filed  on  April 2, 2002 with the
Commission  (Commission  File  No.  000-29913), the shareholders of Starfest and
Concierge  did  approve the merger, and the merger was legally effected on March
20,  2002.

        Pursuant  to  the  agreement of  merger between  Starfest and Concierge,

     -  Starfest  was  the  surviving  corporation,

     -  The  shareholders  of  Concierge  received  pro rata for their shares of
        common stock of Concierge, 99,957,713 shares of common stock of Starfest
        in the merger,  and all  shares  of  capital  stock  of  Concierge  were
        cancelled,

     -  The  fiscal  year-end  of  the  corporation  was  changed  to  June  30,

     -  The  officers  and  directors  of  Concierge  became  the  officers  and
        directors  of  Starfest,  and

     -  The  name  of  Starfest  was  changed  to "Concierge Technologies, Inc."

Business  of  Concierge  Technologies

     The  business  of  Concierge  Technologies  is  to  conceptualize,  design,
develop,  distribute  and  market  software,  hardware  and  services within the
personal  communications  industry.  As  of June 30, 2002, we offer one product,
which is known by the name "Personal Communications Attendant" or the "PCA". The
PCA  is in the form of a CD containing a proprietary program application coupled
with  licensed voice recognition and text-to-speech software than enables a user
to  retrieve  email  messages from any remote telephone and have the text of the
email  message  "read" in a computer generated voice. This product was developed
and  manufactured  in  limited  quantities prior to the completion of the merger
with  Starfest. Although the product was available for distribution, the Company
was  without  sufficient funds to properly market the product in timely fashion.
As  a  result  of the passing time, later introduction of new operating systems,
changes  in  email client code, changes in consumer buying habits, the expanding
presence  of  wireless  Internet  and email appliances, and the declining use of
dial-up voice modems have all contributed to the need to upgrade the PCA product
prior  to  re-engaging  an  aggressive  marketing  effort.

     With the PCA in its current form, we do not expect any significant revenues
to be generated from retail sales. Until such time as the PCA can be upgraded to
a later format, we will only offer the product for sale via its promotion on our
website,  www.pcahome.com  or www.conciergetech.com. The retail price of the PCA
is  $39.95.

     Governmental  Approval  of Principal Products.  No governmental approval is
required  in  the  U.S.  for  Concierge's  products.

                                        2
<PAGE>

     Government  Regulations.  There are no governmental regulations in the U.S.
that  apply  to  Concierge's  products.

     Dependence on Major Customers and Suppliers.  Concierge does not anticipate
that  it  will  be  dependent  on  any  major  customers  or  suppliers.

     Seasonality.  There  should  be  no seasonal aspect to Concierge's business
other  than  possible increased sales anticipated in the fourth calendar quarter
associated  with  the  year-end  holidays.

     Research  and  Development.  Concierge  expended  no  funds on research and
development  in  2001.

     Environmental  Controls.  Concierge is subject to no environmental controls
or  restrictions that require the outlay of capital or the obtaining of a permit
in  order  to  engage  in  business.

     Patents,  Trademarks,  Copyrights and Intellectual Property.  Concierge has
trademarked  its  Personal  Communications  Attendant.  It has no patents on the
product.

     Number  of  Employees.  On  September 30, 2002, we employed no persons full
time  and  no  persons  part  time.

ITEM  2.     DESCRIPTION  OF  PROPERTY

     We  own  no  plants,  real  property  or  personal  property.

Facilities

     Our  office  facilities  are  co-located  with  those  of our President and
C.O.O.,  David  Neibert, at 22048 Sherman Way, Suite 303, Canoga Park, CA 91303.
We  have no lease and currently pay no rent.  In the event we are able to secure
the  additional  funds  required to further our business plan, the shared office
space  consisting  of  approximately  880  square  feet, including furniture and
fixtures,  can  be leased by us for the amount of $1,235 per month on a one-year
lease.  Should additional space be needed, there is ample office space available
in  the  vicinity  at  competitive  prices.

ITEM  3.     LEGAL  PROCEEDINGS

     On May 6, 2002, a default judgment was awarded to Brookside Investments Ltd
against,  jointly  and  severally, our company, Allen E. Kahn, and The Whitehall
Companies in the amount of $135,000 plus interest and legal fees.  Concierge did
not  defend against the complaint by Brookside, which alleged that Brookside was
entitled  to  a  refund of their investment as a result of a breach of contract.

                                        3
<PAGE>

Brookside  had  entered into a subscription agreement with Concierge, Inc. which
called  for,  among  other  things,  the  pending  merger  between  Starfest and
Concierge  to be completed within 180 days of the investment. The merger was not
completed  within  180  days  and Brookside sought a refund of their investment,
which  Concierge  was  unable  to  provide.

     As of October 3, 2002, Brookside has not attempted to enforce its judgment.
We  are  in   discussions  with  representatives  from  Brookside  concerning  a
resolution of the matter. As of October 3, 2002, we are unable to pay the amount
of  the  judgment  and  have no assets available to Brookside for liquidation in
settlement  of  the  judgment.

     Neither  Concierge  Technologies  nor any of its property is the subject of
any  other  pending  legal  proceedings  or  any proceeding which a governmental
authority  is  contemplating.

ITEM  4.     SUBMISSION  OF  MATTERS  TO  A  VOTE  OF  SECURITY  HOLDERS

     On  January  25,  2002  the  shareholders  of Starfest voted to approve the
merger  with  Concierge  Technologies,  Inc.

ITEM  5.     MARKET  FOR  COMMON  EQUITY  AND  RELATED  STOCKHOLDER  MATTERS

          Our Common Stock presently trades on the OTC Bulletin Board.  The high
and  low  bid  and  asked  prices, as reported by the OTC Bulletin Board, are as
follows  for  fiscal  years  ended June 30, 2000, 2001 and 2002.  The quotations
reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and
may  not  represent  actual  transactions.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                Average  Daily
                                     High          Low          Shares  Traded
                                     ----          ---          --------------
          Calendar  1999:
<S>                                 <C>          <C>               <C>
               3rd  Qtr.            0.2000       0.0600            105,733
               4th  Qtr.            0.1050       0.0450             95,998

          Calendar  2000:
               1st  Qtr.            2.3125       0.075             852,552
               2nd  Qtr.            2.9688       0.3700            215,654
               3rd  Qtr.            0.7813       0.35              108,162
               4th  Qtr.            0.41         0.09375           186,584

          Calendar  2001:
               1st  Qtr.            0.18         0.081              79,969
               2nd  Qtr.            0.25         0.08              146,105
               3rd  Qtr.            0.215        0.035             110,617
               4th  Qtr.            0.26         0.05               98,005
</TABLE>

<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

          Calendar  2002:
<S>                                 <C>          <C>               <C>
               1st  Qtr.            0.14         0.049              41,877
               2nd  Qtr.            0.15         0.035             104,629
</TABLE>

Holders

     On September 30, 2002 there were approximately 285 holders of record of our
common  stock.  Approximately 63,608,655 shares are held for approximately 4,200
owners  of  our  common  stock  in the name of "Cede & Co.," which is the record
holder  for  shares  in  numerous  brokerage  accounts.

Rule  144  and  Rule  145  Restrictions  on  Trading

     All  shares of common stock of the post-merger company issued in the merger
to the stockholders of Concierge, Inc. were issued pursuant to registration with
the  Commission.  Nevertheless,  there  are certain restrictions on the transfer
for  value  of the shares received in the merger by the affiliates of Concierge,
Inc.  who  may  be  deemed  to  be  underwriters.

     Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  rules  define  as  "affiliates"  a
corporation's  executive  officers,  directors  and  other  persons  who, by any
manner,  exercise  control  over  the corporation's direction and policies.  The
affiliates  of Concierge, Inc. at the time of the merger, in order to sell their
shares  received  in  the merger, must either register them for resale or comply
with  the  resale provisions set forth in paragraph (d) of the Commission's Rule
145,  unless some other exemption-from-registration provision is available.  The
resale  provisions  of  paragraph (d) of Rule 145 refer to certain provisions of
the  Commission's  Rule  144  and  require,  for  sales  of  the  shares by such
affiliates,  that:

          -    the company must  have been subject to the reporting requirements
               of Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act for
               at  least  90  days  (which  is  the  case,  here),

          -    the company must  have  filed  all  reports  with  the Commission
               required  by  such  rule  during the twelve months preceding such
               sale  (or  such  shorter  period that the company was required to
               file  such  reports)  (which  is  the  case,  here),

          -    transfers for value  by such affiliates can occur only either (1)
               through  broker  transactions  not  involving the solicitation of
               buyers  or  (2)  directly  to  market-makers,  and

          -    each such affiliate  can  transfer  for  value,  during  a 90-day
               period,  no  more  shares  than the greater of one percent of all
               issued  and  outstanding  shares  of  common stock of the company
               (119,957,713  shares immediately after the merger) or the average
               weekly  volume  of  trading in such common stock reported through
               the  automated  quotation  system of Nasdaq or the Bulletin Board
               during  the  four  calendar weeks prior to placing the sell order
               with  a  broker-dealer.

                                        5
<PAGE>

     The  above resale provisions of Rule 145 shall continue for such affiliates
for  one year after the merger - until March 20, 2003.  Then, only the company's
reporting  requirement shall continue.  When any such affiliate has ceased to be
an  affiliate of the post-merger company for at least three months, and provided
at  least  two  years  have  elapsed since the date of the merger, then even the
requirement  that the company file reports with the Commission will no longer be
required  for  such a former affiliate to sell any of the shares acquired in the
merger.

     The  following  table  allocates  the  post-merger  company's  common stock
between restricted and non-restricted stock for Concierge, Inc.'s and Starfest's
affiliates  at  the  time  of  the  merger:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           Percent of   No. of Shares Restricted
   Post-Merger Company     No. of Shares  Total Issued    by Rules 144 and 145
   -------------------     -------------  ------------  ------------------------
<S>                         <C>               <C>                 <C>
Authorized  shares          190,000,000           -                        -

Issued and outstanding
  shares                    126,292,749       100.0               66,661,909
                            -----------       -----               ----------

Issued and outstanding
  shares to be controlled
  by Concierge, Inc.'s                                            Rule 145:
  affiliates                 59,993,856        47.5               59,993,856

Issued and outstanding
  shares to be controlled                                         Rule 144:
  by Starfest's affiliates      860,000         0.7                  860,000

Shares  issued  for
  services or cash in
  the post-merger period                                          Rule 144:
  to non-affiliates           5,808,053         4.6                5,808,053

Shares in the "public
  float," subject to no
  restrictions on trading    59,630,840        47.2                        -
                            -----------       -----                ---------

                            126,292,749       100.0               66,661,909
</TABLE>

     The  860,000 shares controlled by Starfest's affiliates were issued in 2000
and  will  continue  to be "restricted" shares until they have been held for two
years.  The  same  is  true  of the 1,402,001 other shares of Starfest issued in
2000.  After  such shares have been held for one year, they may be sold pursuant
to  the  provisions of Rule 144, the principal ones of which are set forth above
on  pages  5  and  6 as "bullet points" in the second paragraph of this heading.

     No  equity  of  Starfest  is  subject to outstanding options or warrants to
purchase,  or  securities  convertible  into,  equity  of  the  company.

Dividends

     We  have  had  no  earnings  and  have declared no dividends on our capital
stock.  Under  California  law,  a  company  -  such  as  our  company - can pay
dividends  only

                                        6
<PAGE>
          -    from  retained  earnings,  or

          -    if  after  the  dividend  is  made,

          -    its  tangible  assets  would   equal  at  least  11/4  times  its
               liabilities, and

               -     its  current  assets  would  at  least  equal  its  current
                     liabilities,  or

               -     if  the average  of its  earnings before  income taxes  and
                     before interest expenses for the last  two  years  was less
                     than the average of  its interest expenses for the last two
                     years, then its current assets  must  be  equal to at least
                     11/4 times its current  liabilities.

     The  directors'  strategy on dividends is to declare and pay dividends only
from  retained  earnings  and when the directors deem it prudent and in the best
interests  of  the  company  to  declare  and  pay  dividends.

Penny  Stock  Regulations

     Our common stock trades on the OTC Bulletin Board at a price less than $5 a
share  and  is  subject  to  the  rules  governing  "penny  stocks."

     A  "penny  stock"  is  any  stock  that:

     -     sells  for  less  than  $5  a  share.

     -     is  not  listed  on  an  exchange  or authorized for quotation on The
           Nasdaq  Stock  Market,  and

     -     is  not  a  stock  of  a  "substantial  issuer."  We  are  not  now a
          "substantial  issuer" and cannot become one until we have net tangible
          assets  of  at  least  $2  million.

     There  are  statutes  and  regulations  of  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  (the  "Commission")  that  impose  a  strict regimen on brokers that
recommend  penny  stocks.

     The  Penny  Stock  Suitability  Rule
     ------------------------------------

     Before  a  broker-dealer  can  recommend  and  sell  a penny stock to a new
customer who is not an institutional accredited investor, the broker-dealer must
obtain  from  the  customer  information  concerning  the  person's  financial
situation,  investment  experience  and  investment  objectives.  Then,  the
broker-dealer  must "reasonably determine" (1) that transactions in penny stocks
are  suitable for the person and (2) that the person, or his advisor, is capable
of  evaluating  the  risks  in  penny  stocks.

                                        7
<PAGE>

     After  making  this  determination,  the  broker-dealer  must  furnish  the
customer  with  a written statement setting forth the basis for this suitability
determination.  The  customer must sign and date a copy of the written statement
and  return  it  to  the  broker-dealer.

     Finally  the  broker-dealer  must  also  obtain from the customer a written
agreement  to  purchase the penny stock, identifying the stock and the number of
shares  to  be  purchased.

     The  above  exercise  delays  a  proposed  transaction.  It  causes  many
broker-dealer  firms  to adopt a policy of not allowing their representatives to
recommend  penny  stocks  to  their  customers.

     The  Penny  Stock  Suitability  Rule,  described above, and the Penny Stock
Disclosure  Rule,  described  below,  do  not  apply  to  the  following:

     -     transactions  not  recommended  by  the  broker-dealer,

     -     sales  to  institutional  accredited  investors,

     -     transactions  in  which  the customer is a director, officer, general
           partner, or  direct  or  indirect  beneficial  owner  of  more than 5
           percent of  any  class  of equity security of the issuer of the penny
           stock  that  is  the  subject  of  the  transaction,  and

     -     transactions  in  penny  stocks  by  broker-dealers whose income from
           penny stock  activities  does  not exceed five percent of their total
           income  during certain  defined  periods.

     The  Penny  Stock  Disclosure  Rule
     -----------------------------------

     Another  Commission  rule  -  the  Penny stock Disclosure Rule - requires a
broker-dealer,  who  recommends  the  sale  of  a penny stock to a customer in a
transaction not exempt from the suitability rule described above, to furnish the
customer  with  a  "risk  disclosure document."  This document is set forth in a
federal  regulation  and  contains  the  following  information:

     -    A statement that  penny stocks can be very risky, that investors often
          cannot sell a penny stock back to the dealer that sold them the stock,

     -    A  warning  that  salespersons  of   penny  stocks  are  not impartial
          advisers  but  are  paid  to  sell  the  stock,

     -    The  statement  that federal  law requires the salesperson to tell the
          potential  investor  in  a  penny  stock  -

          -     the  "offer"  and  the  "bid"  on  the  stock,  and

                                        8
<PAGE>

          -     the  compensation  the salesperson and his firm will receive for
                the  trade,

     -    An  explanation  that  the  offer  price  and  the  bid  price are the
          wholesale  prices  at  which  dealers  are willing to sell and buy the
          stock  from  other  dealers, and that in its trade with a customer the
          dealer  may  add  a  retail charge  to  these  wholesale  prices,

     -    A warning that  a large spread between the bid and the offer price can
          make  the  resale  of  the  stock  very  costly,

     -    Telephone  numbers  a  person  can  call  if he or  she is a victim of
          fraud,

     -    Admonitions  -

          -     to  use  caution  when  investing  in  penny  stocks,

          -     to  understand  the  risky  nature  of  penny  stocks,

          -     to  know the brokerage firm and the salespeople with whom one is
                dealing,  and

          -     to  be  cautious  if  ones  salesperson  leaves  the  firm.

Finally,  the  customer  must  be  furnished  with a monthly statement including
prescribed  information  relating to market and price information concerning the
penny  stocks  held  in  the  customer's  account.

     Effects  of  the  Rule
     ----------------------.

     The  above  penny stock regulatory scheme is a response by the Congress and
the  Commission to known abuses in the telemarketing of low-priced securities by
"boiler  shop" operators.  The scheme imposes market impediments on the sale and
trading of penny stocks.  It has a limiting effect on a stockholder's ability to
resell  a  penny  stock.

     Our shares likely will trade below $5 a share on the OTC Bulletin Board and
be,  for  some  time  at least, shares of a "penny stock" subject to the trading
market  impediments  described  above.

Recent  Sales  of  Unregistered  Securities

     Our  company  sold the following shares of its common stock during the last
three  years  without  registering  the  shares:

                                        9
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                No. of                                               Value of
       Date     Shares   Name of Purchaser  Type of Consideration  Consideration
<S>             <C>         <C>                    <C>              <C>
     08-12-02     500,000   Samuel Wu              Cash             $  30,000
     06-20-02   2,532,581   John Everding          Services         $ 119,031
     08-12-02   2,870,259   Ken Lamkin             Services         $ 134,873
     08-12-02     405,213   Trudy Self             Services         $  19,041
</TABLE>

     All  of  the  above  sales  were  made  pursuant  to   the  exemption  from
registration  provided   by  the  Commission's  Regulation  D,  Rule  506.   All
purchasers  were either accredited investors or, if not, were provided copies of
the  company's recent filings with the Commission including financial statements
meeting  the  requirements  of the Commission's Item 310 of Regulation S-B.  All
purchasers  were  provided  the  opportunity  to  ask  questions  of Concierge's
management.

ITEM  6.     PLAN  OF  OPERATIONS

     Our  plan of operation for the next twelve months is to source and secure a
development  partner to upgrade the PCA to a viable commercial product.  We have
initiated  discussions  with several companies who have the expertise to further
the  development  of  the PCA to modern operating systems, and to also provide a
multi-user  version  as  well as other feature set upgrades. The final nature of
the  proposed  relationship  between us and any development partner is yet to be
determined.  Once  the  multi-user, upgraded version of the PCA is completed, we
intend  to  continue our marketing efforts via direct mail, bundled OEM software
with  new PCs, web based advertising and a physical presence at retail points of
purchase.  In  order  to  complete  the  development  and initiate the marketing
efforts,  we  project  that  $500,000  of  expenses  will  be  incurred prior to
achieving  a break-even cash flow position. There is currently no assurance that
we  will  be  able  to  source the needed funds, or that if we are successful in
sourcing  funds through either debt or equity financing, that such funds will be
sufficient  to  achieve  profitability.

     In  addition  to  pursuing  an  upgrade to its current product offering, we
intend  to aggressively pursue other opportunities in the field of communication
services  by  partnering  with  start-up  and  development stage companies whose
products  are  in  the  introductory  stages.  Through  a combination of product
offerings  including  wireless  airtime,  wireless   Internet  access,  software
offerings,  and  subscription services, we hope to build a vertically integrated
company  able  to  respond  in  timely  fashion  to   the  consumer  demand  for
communications  services.  Our  management  believes  that  such   a  vertically
integrated company will be worth, as a whole, more than the sum of the otherwise
separate  entities. As such, management expects the consolidated company to be a
more  attractive  investment opportunity for the financial community in general.

     Leveraging the expertise of its management and directors, who are currently
providing  their  time  without charge, we have established contact with several
likely  strategic  partners.  Should  we  be  successful  in  our  negotiations,
management  hopes  to  be  able  to acquire control of certain of these targeted
companies  through  an  equity exchange and cash compensation. Management is not
seeking  a  transaction that would result in a change of control; however, it is

                                       10
<PAGE>
likely  that,  if  the  transactions  being contemplated by management are to be
carried  through  to  conclusion,  our  current  shareholders  would suffer some
dilution. Further dilution to current shareholders is also possible, and likely,
to  occur  simultaneous  with  a  successful  financing  effort.

     On  June  17,  2002,  David  W.  Neibert  became  our  President  and Chief
Operations  Officer.  Upon  assuming  that role, he moved the general accounting
and  administrative  offices  of  the  company to co-location with his firm, The
Wallen Group.  We do not currently pay rent and have no lease for the facilities
being  provided  by  Mr.  Neibert.  He  has agreed to provide his services at no
charge to the company until such time as we are in a financial position to pay a
reasonable  salary   commensurate  with  compensation  packages  paid  to  other
executives  of publicly traded companies in similar stages of development within
the  personal  communications  industry.

     As  of  September  30, 2002, we had no employees other than unpaid officers
and  no  fixed  overhead  other than the variable cost of web hosting, legal and
professional  fees, fees charged by our transfer agent and minimum tax payments.
We  own  no  office  fixtures,  furniture  or  appliances.

Liquidity

     Our  only  source  of  operating  capital  has been funding sourced through
insiders  or  shareholders  under  the  terms of unsecured promissory notes. The
amount  of  borrowed  funds  have  been  sufficient to pay the cost of legal and
accounting  fees  as  necessary  to maintain a current reporting status with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission.   However,  sufficient  funds  have  been
unavailable  to  pay  down commercial and vendor accounts payable.  We have also
been  unable  to  pay  salaries  to  our  officers  and  several  of our outside
consultants  who  had  performed  services  earlier  in  the  fiscal  year.

     Although our management will continue to provide service to the Company for
the  near term without pay, we will still require additional funding to maintain
the corporation and further the development of the PCA product. Management hopes
to source the needed funds through a debt financing of the acquisitions targeted
for the next several months. If the financing is not available, the acquisitions
themselves  will also not be completed. In the event either the financing or the
proposed  acquisitions  are  not  completed,  our  funds  will  be exhausted and
continuing  operations  may  be  impossible.

















                                       11
<PAGE>



ITEM  7.     FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  INDEX

     The  financial  statements  of  the  company  appear  as  follows:

     Independent  Auditors'  Report                                          13
     Balance  Sheet,  June  30,  2002                                        14
     Statements  of  Operations,  Twelve  Months  Ended  June  30,
          2002  and  June  30,  2001  and  the  Period  from
          September 20, 1996 (Inception) to June 30, 2002                    15
     Statements  of  Changes  in  Stockholders'  Equity  (Deficit),
          Advance  Subscriptions  and  Common  Stock
          Subject  to  Contingency  for  the  Period  September  30,
          1996  (Inception)  to  June  30, 2002                              16
     Statements  of  Cash  Flows,  Years  Ended  June  30,  2002
          and  June  30,  2001  and  the  Period  from
          September 20, 1996 (Inception) to June 30, 2002                    17
     Notes  to  Financial  Statements                                        18
























                                       12
<PAGE>

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT


To  the  Stockholders  and  Board  of  Directors
Concierge  Technologies,  Inc.

We  have  audited the accompanying balance sheet of Concierge Technologies, Inc.
(a  development stage company) as of June 30, 2002 and the related statements of
operations,  stockholders'  equity  and cash flows for the period then ended and
for  the  period  from  September  20, 1996 (inception), to June 30, 2002. These
financial  statements  are  the  responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility  is  to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our  audit.

We  conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in  the  United  States  of  America.  Those  standards require that we plan and
perform  the  audit  to  obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a
test  basis,  evidence  supporting  the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant  estimates  made  by  management,  as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provide a reasonable
basis  for  our  opinion.

In  our  opinion,  the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position Concierge Technologies, Inc. as of
June  30,  2002  and  the  results  of its operations and its cash flows for the
period  then ended and from September 20, 1996 (inception), to June 30, 2002, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.

The  Company's  financial  statements  are prepared using the generally accepted
accounting  principles  applicable  to  a  going concern, which contemplates the
realization  of  assets  and  liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of
business.  The  Company's has not earned any revenue since its inception and has
accumulated  deficit  of  $2,758,565  at  June 30, 2002, including a net loss of
$478,229 during the year ended June 30, 2002. These factors as discussed in Note
3  to  the  financial  statements,  raises substantial doubt about the Company's
ability  to  continue  as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these
matters  are  also  described in Note 3. The financial statements do not include
any  adjustments  that  might  result  from  the  outcome  of  this uncertainty.


/s/  Kabani  &  Company,  Inc.

KABANI  &  COMPANY,  INC.
CERTIFIED  PUBLIC  ACCOUNTANTS

Fountain  Valley,  California
September  26,  2002




                                       13
<PAGE>







                          CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                          (A development stage company)
                                  BALANCE SHEET
                                  JUNE 30, 2002

                                     ASSETS
                                     ------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CURRENT  ASSETS:
<S>                                                                <C>
     Cash & cash equivalents                                       $       655
     Prepaid Expenses                                                  245,800
                                                                     ---------
         Total current assets                                          246,455

     EQUIPMENT, net                                                        903
                                                                     ---------

                                                                   $   247,358
                                                                   ===========

                      LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
                     --------------------------------------

CURRENT  LIABILITIES:
     Accrued expenses                                              $   348,796
     Loans Payable-Shareholders                                        304,208
                                                                   -----------
          Total current liabilities                                    653,004

SUBSCRIPTIONS  RECEIVED  FOR  COMMON  STOCK
  SUBJECT TO CONTINGENCY                                             1,663,290

COMMON STOCK ISSUED SUBJECT TO CONTINGENCY                             266,610

STOCKHOLDERS'  DEFICIT:
     Preferred stock, par value $.001 per share; 10,000,000
       shares  authorized;  none  issued

     Common  stock,  no  par  value;  190,000,000  shares
       authorized; issued and outstanding 122,590,294                  239,089
     Shares to be issued                                               183,930
     Deficit accumulated during the development stage               (2,758,565)
                                                                   -----------
          Total stockholders' deficit                               (2,335,546)
                                                                   -----------

                                                                   $   247,358
                                                                   ===========
</TABLE>

   The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

                                       14

<PAGE>
                          CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                          (A development stage company)
                            STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
             YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002 AND 2001 AND THE PERIOD FROM
                SEPTEMBER 20, 1996 (INCEPTION) TO JUNE 30, 2002

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 SEPTEMBER 20,
                                      JUNE 30,     JUNE 30,     1996 (INCEPTION)
                                        2002         2001       TO JUNE 30, 2002
                                     -----------  ------------  ----------------
<S>                                  <C>          <C>           <C>
REVENUE                              $         -  $          -   $         -

COSTS  AND  EXPENSES
  Product  launch  Expenses                    -       230,241     1,077,785
  General & Administrative Expenses      395,029       313,039     1,315,053
                                     -----------  ------------   -----------
    TOTAL COSTS AND EXPENSES             395,029       543,280     2,392,838

OTHER  INCOME/(EXPENSES)
  Settlement  income,  net                52,600             -        52,600
  Litigation  settlement                (135,000)            -      (135,000)
                                     -----------  ------------   -----------
    TOTAL  OTHER  INCOME/(EXPENSES)      (82,400)            -       (82,400)
                                     -----------  ------------   -----------

NET LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES            (477,429)     (543,280)   (2,475,238)

  Provision  of  Income  Taxes               800           800         4,800
                                     -----------  ------------   -----------

NET LOSS                             $  (478,229)  $  (544,080)  $(2,480,038)
                                     ===========   ===========   ===========

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OF
  COMMON  STOCK  OUTSTANDING,
  BASIC AND DILUTED                  120,134,037   120,057,713
                                     ===========   ===========

BASIC AND DILUTED NET LOSS
  PER SHARE                          $    (0.004)  $    (0.005)
                                     ===========   ===========
</TABLE>


   The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

                                       15
<PAGE>
                          CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                          (A development stage company)
        STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT), ADVANCE
                                  SUBSCRIPTIONS
                    AND COMMON STOCK SUBJECT TO CONTINGENCY
         FOR THE PERIOD SEPTEMBER 20, 1996 (INCEPTION) TO JUNE 30, 2002

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                  Common Stock                                                                        Common Stock
                         Number of   Par     Additional      Shares      Accumulated   Stockholders'      Advance      subject to
                          shares    value  Paid In Capital to be issued    Deficit    Equity (deficit)  Subscriptions  contingency
                         ---------  -----  --------------- ------------  -----------  ----------------  ------------- -------------
Common Stock issued
  for cash though
<S>                    <C>         <C>        <C>            <C>         <C>            <C>              <C>            <C>
  June 30, 1997            176,306 $  1,763   $ 106,162             -    $         -    $    107,925     $         -    $       -

Common stock issued
  for services through
  June 30, 1997            621,545    6,215           -             -              -           6,215               -            -

Net loss through
  June  30, 1997                 -        -           -             -        (96,933)        (96,933)              -            -
                       ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Balance at
  June 30, 1997            797,851    7,978     106,162             -        (96,933)         17,207               -            -

Common Stock issued
  for cash in the year
  ended June 30, 1998      137,475    1,375     194,650             -              -         196,025               -            -

Common stock issued
  for services in
  the year ended
  June 30, 1998             22,550      226           -             -              -             226               -            -

Net loss for the year
  ended June 30, 1998            -        -           -             -       (283,891)       (283,891)              -            -
                       ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Balance at June 30,
  1998                     957,876    9,579     300,812             -       (380,824)        (70,433)              -            -

Common Stock issued
  for cash in the year
  ended June 30, 1999      208,000        -           -             -              -               -               -       60,996

Common stock issued
  for  services in
  the year ended
  June 30, 1999                450        -           -             -              -               -               -            4

Net loss for the year
  ended June 30, 1999            -        -           -             -        (89,919)        (89,919)              -            -
                       ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Balance at
  June 30, 1999          1,166,326    9,579     300,812             -       (470,743)       (160,352)              -       61,000

Acquisition and
  retirement  of
  Common  shares          (262,000)  (2,620)          -             -              -          (2,620)              -            -

Common Stock issued
  for cash in the year
  ended June 30, 2000      117,184        -           -             -              -               -               -      202,061

Common stock issued
  for services in
  the year ended
  June 30, 2000            354,870        -           -             -              -               -               -        3,549

Post acquisition stock
  subscription  funds
  received net of costs
  & expenses of $79,710          -        -           -             -              -               -       1,175,790            -

Net loss for the year
  ended June 30, 2000            -        -           -             -        (986,986)       (986,986)             -            -
                       ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Balance at
  June 30, 2000          1,376,380    6,959     300,812             -      (1,457,729)     (1,149,958)     1,175,790      266,610

Post acquisition
  stock subscription
  funds received                 -        -           -             -               -               -        487,500            -

Net loss for the year
  ended June 30, 2001            -        -           -             -        (544,080)       (544,080)             -            -
                       ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Balance at
  June 30, 2001          1,376,380    6,959     300,812             -      (2,001,809)     (1,694,038)     1,663,290      266,610

Recapitalization
  upon merger          118,681,333  113,099    (300,812)            -        (278,527)       (466,240)             -            -

Stock subscription
  received for
  500,000 shares                 -        -           -        29,983              -           29,983              -            -

Stock issued for
  services               2,532,581  119,031           -             -              -          119,031              -            -

Stock to be issued
  for services -
  3,275,472 shares               -        -           -       153,947              -          153,947              -            -

Net loss for the year
  ended June 30, 2002            -        -           -             -       (478,229)        (478,229)             -            -
                       ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at
  June 30, 2002        122,590,294 $239,089   $       -      $ 183,930   $(2,758,565)   $  (2,335,546)   $ 1,663,290    $ 266,610
                       ==========================================================================================================
</TABLE>


   The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

                                       16
<PAGE>

                          CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                          (A development stage company)
                            STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
             YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002 AND 2001 AND THE PERIOD FROM
                 SEPTEMBER 20, 1996 (INCEPTION) TO JUNE 30, 2002

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 SEPTEMBER 20,
                                      JUNE 30,     JUNE 30,     1996 (INCEPTION)
                                        2002         2001       TO JUNE 30, 2002
                                     -----------  ------------  ----------------
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING
  ACTIVITIES:
<S>                                  <C>          <C>             <C>
  Net loss                           $ (478,229)  $  (544,080)    $(2,480,038)
  Adjustments to reconcile net
    loss to net cash used in
    operating  activities:
      Depreciation and amortization       1,207         2,582          12,007
      Stock issued for services         119,031             -         126,405
      Stock to be issued for services   153,947                       153,947
      Increase  in  current  assets:
        Prepaid  Expenses                     -             -        (245,800)
      Increase/(decrease) in
      current  liabilities:
        Accrued  expenses               173,521       (48,012)        264,264
      Payroll tax payable                     -        (4,400)              -
                                     ----------   -----------     -----------
      Net cash used in
        operating activities            (30,523)     (593,910)     (2,169,215)
                                     ----------   -----------     -----------

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING
  ACTIVITIES:
      Note  receivable  -
        related party                         -            -         (100,000)
      Acquisition of property
        &  equipment                          -            -          (12,910)
                                     ----------   -----------     -----------
      Net cash used in investing
        activities                            -            -         (112,910)
                                     ----------   -----------     -----------

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING
  ACTIVITIES:
  Proceeds from Issuance of Shares            -            -          567,007
  Proceeds from advance
    subscriptions                        29,983      487,500        1,772,983
  Costs and expenses of advance
    subscriptions                             -            -          (79,710)
  Proceeds from (repayments of)
    related  party  loans                   500       22,000           22,500
                                     ----------   -----------     -----------
  Net cash provided by financing
    activities                           30,483      509,500        2,282,780
                                     ----------   -----------     -----------

NET INCREASE/(DECREASE) IN CASH &
 CASH EQUIVALENTS                           (40)     (84,410)             655

CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS,
  BEGINNING  BALANCE                        695       85,105                -
                                     ----------   -----------     -----------

CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS,
  ENDING BALANCE                     $      655   $      695      $       655
                                     ==========   ==========      ===========
</TABLE>

   The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

                                       17
<PAGE>

                          CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                          (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


1.     DESCRIPTION  OF  BUSINESS  AND  BASIS  OF  PRESENTATION


Starfest,  Inc.  (the  Company),  a  California corporation, was incorporated on
August  18,  1993 as Fanfest, Inc.  In August, 1995 the Company changed its name
to  Starfest,  Inc.  During  1998, the Company was inactive, just having minimal
administrative expenses.  During 1999 the Company attempted to pursue operations
in  the  online  adult  entertainment  field.  There  were no revenues from this
endeavor.  On  March  20,  2002,  the  Company  changed  its  name  to Concierge
Technologies,  Inc.

In  March  2000,  the  Company  acquired  approximately 96.83 percent (8,250,000
shares)  of  the common stock of MAS Acquisition XX Corp. (MAS XX) for $314,688.
This amount was expensed in March 2000 as at the time of the acquisition, MAS XX
had  no  assets  or liabilities and was inactive. On March 21, 2002, the Company
consummated  a  merger  with  Concierge,  Inc. (see note 11). The Company is the
surviving  entity  as  a  result  of  the  merger.

Concierge,  Inc.  ("CI"), was a development stage enterprise incorporated in the
state  of  Nevada  on September 20, 1996.  The CI had undertaken the development
and  marketing  of  a  new technology, a unified messaging product "The Personal
Communications  Attendant"  ("PCA  ").  "PCA " will provide a means by which the
user  of  Internet  e-mail  can  have e-mail messages spoken to him/her over any
touch-tone  telephone  or  wireless  phone  in  the  world.

Principles  of  Recapitalization

The  accompanying  financial  statements  for the period ended June 30, 2002 and
2001  include the accounts of the CI for the twelve-month periods ended June 30,
2002 and 2001. The operations of the Company have been included with those of CI
since  the  date  of  consummation  of  the merger. For accounting purposes, the
transaction between the Company and CI has been treated as a recapitalization of
the  Company,  with CI as the accounting acquirer (reverse acquisition), and has
been  accounted  for  in  a  manner  similar to a pooling of interests. Proforma
financial  statements  are  not  presented as the net assets of the Company were
insignificant  prior  to  merger.

2.     SUMMARY  OF  SIGNIFICANT  ACCOUNTING  POLICIES

Cash  and  cash  equivalents

The  Company considers all liquid investments with a maturity of three months or
less from the date of purchase that are readily convertible into cash to be cash
equivalents.

Use  of  estimates

The  preparation  of  financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect  the  reported  amounts  of  assets  and  liabilities  and  disclosure of
contingent  assets  and  liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the  reported  amounts  of  revenues  and  expenses during the reporting period.
Actual  results  could  differ  from  those  estimates.

Equipment

Equipment  is  carried  at cost. Depreciation of equipment is provided using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Expenditures
for  maintenance  and  repairs  are  charged  to  expense  as  incurred.


                                       18
<PAGE>
                          CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                          (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Income  taxes

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed annually for differences
between  the  financial  statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities that
will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based on enacted laws
and  rates  applicable  to  the periods in which the differences are expected to
affect  taxable income (loss). Valuation allowance is established when necessary
to  reduce  deferred  tax  assets  to  the  amount  expected  to  be  realized.

Basic  and  diluted  net  loss  per  share

Net  loss  per share is calculated in accordance with the Statement of financial
accounting  standards No. 128 (SFAS No. 128), "Earnings per share". SFAS No. 128
superseded  Accounting  Principles  Board  Opinion  No.15 (APB 15). Net loss per
share  for  all  periods  presented has been restated to reflect the adoption of
SFAS No. 128. Basic net loss per share is based upon the weighted average number
of  common  shares  outstanding.  Diluted  net  loss  per  share is based on the
assumption that all dilutive convertible shares and stock options were converted
or  exercised. Dilution is computed by applying the treasury stock method. Under
this  method,  options and warrants are assumed to be exercised at the beginning
of  the  period (or at the time of issuance, if later), and as if funds obtained
thereby  were  used  to purchase common stock at the average market price during
the  period.

Stock-based  compensation

In  October  1995,  the  FASB  issued  SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation".  SFAS  No.  123 prescribes accounting and reporting standards for
all stock-based compensation plans, including employee stock options, restricted
stock, employee stock purchase plans and stock appreciation rights. SFAS No. 123
requires compensation expense to be recorded (i) using the new fair value method
or  (ii) using the existing accounting rules prescribed by Accounting Principles
Board  Opinion  No.  25, "Accounting for stock issued to employees" (APB 25) and
related  interpretations  with  pro  forma  disclosure  of  what  net income and
earnings  per  share  would have been had the Company adopted the new fair value
method.  The company uses the intrinsic value method prescribed by APB25 and has
opted  for  the disclosure provisions of SFAS No.123. The implementation of this
standard did not have any material impact on the Company's financial statements.

Issuance  of  shares  for  service

Valuation  of shares for services is based on the estimated fair market value of
the  services  performed.

Fair  value  of  financial  instruments

Statement of financial accounting standard No. 107, Disclosures about fair value
of  financial  instruments,  requires  that  the Company disclose estimated fair
values of financial instruments. The carrying amounts reported in the statements
of  financial  position for current assets and current liabilities qualifying as
financial  instruments  are  a  reasonable  estimate  of  fair  value.

Accounting for the costs of computer software developed or obtained for internal
use

In  March  1998,  the  Accounting  Standards Executive Committee of the American
Institute  of  Certified  Public Accountants (ASEC of AICPA) issued Statement of
position  (SOP)  No.  98-1,  "Accounting  for  the  costs  of  computer software
developed  or  obtained  for internal use", effective for fiscal years beginning

                                       19
<PAGE>
                          CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                          (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


after  December  15,  1998. SOP N0. 98-1 requires that certain costs of computer
software  developed  or  obtained  for internal use be capitalized and amortized
over  the useful life of the related software. The Company adopted this standard
in  fiscal  year  1999  and  the  implementation of this standard did not have a
material  impact  on  its  financial  statements.

Web  site  development  costs

In  March  2000,  the  Emergency  Issues  Task  Force  (EITF) of FASB issued its
consensus  under  EITF-00-02.  Per  the consensus, certain costs incurred in the
development  of  a  Web site should be capitalized. According to the EITF, those
costs  incurred  in  developing  a  software  program  should  be capitalized in
accordance  with  Statement of Position (SOP) 98-1, "Accounting for the costs of
Computer  Software  Developed  or  obtained for internal use". Capitalization of
software  development  costs  begins  upon  the  establishment  of technological
feasibility.  The  establishment  of  technological  feasibility and the ongoing
assessment  of  recoverability of capitalized software development costs require
considerable  judgment  by  management with respect to certain external factors,
including,  but  not limited to, anticipated future revenues, estimated economic
life,  and  changes  in software and hardware technologies. The Company expenses
web  site  development  costs,  which  are  allocated  for  preliminary  project
development,  web  site  general  and  maintenance.

Costs  of  start-up  activities

In April 1998, the ASEC of AICPA issued SOP No. 98-5, "Reporting on the costs of
start-up  activities",  effective  for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
1998.  SOP 98-5 requires the costs of start-up activities and organization costs
to  be  expensed  as  incurred. The Company adopted this standard in fiscal year
1999  and  the implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on
its  financial  statements.

Research  and  Development

Expenditures  for  software  development  costs  and  research  are  expensed as
incurred.  Such  costs  are  required  to  be  expensed  until  the  point  that
technological   feasibility  is  established.    The  period  between  achieving
technological feasibility and the general availability of such software has been
short.   Consequently,   costs  otherwise   capitalizable  after   technological
feasibility  is  achieved are generally expensed because they are insignificant.

Revenue  Recognition

Revenue  Recognition  Revenue  is  recognized when earned. The Company's revenue
recognition  policies   are  in  compliance  with   all  applicable   accounting
regulations,  including  American  Institute  of  Certified  Public  Accountants
(AICPA)  Statement of Position (SOP) 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, and SOP
98-9,  Modification  of  SOP 97-2, With Respect to Certain Transactions. Revenue
from  license  programs is recorded when the software has been delivered and the
customer  is  invoiced.  Revenue  from  packaged  product  sales  to and through
distributors  and  resellers  is recorded when related products are shipped. The
Company  does  not  charge  monthly  service  fee, instead charges only one-time
purchase  price  and  the option of buying upgrades at a fixed fee based on fair
value  of  the  upgrade.  When  the  revenue  recognition  criteria required for
distributor  and  reseller  arrangements  are  not met, revenue is recognized as
payments are received. Costs related to insignificant obligations, which include
telephone support for certain products, are accrued. Provisions are recorded for

                                       20
<PAGE>
                          CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                          (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


returns,  concessions  and  bad  debts. Cost of revenue includes direct costs to
produce  and  distribute  product  and  direct costs to provide online services,
consulting,  product   support,  and  training   and  certification   of  system
integrators.  Research  and  development  costs  are  expensed  as incurred. The
company  did  not  earn  any  revenue in the years ended June 30, 2002 and 2001.

Allowance  for  doubtful  accounts

In determining the allowance to be maintained, management evaluates many factors
including  industry  and historical loss experience.  The allowance for doubtful
accounts is maintained at an amount management deems adequate to cover estimated
losses.  The  company did not have accounts receivable or allowance for doubtful
accounts  as  of  June  30,  2002  and  2001.

Advertising

The  Company  expenses  advertising  costs  as  incurred.

Reclassifications

Certain  prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current
period  presentation.

2.     RECENT  PRONOUNCEMENTS

SFAS  No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,"
was  issued in August 2001. SFAS No. 144 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after  December  15,  2001, and addresses financial accounting and reporting for
the  impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. This statement supersedes SFAS
No.  121  "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived
Assets  to  Be  Disposed Of," and the accounting and reporting provisions of APB
Opinion  No. 30, "Reporting the Results of Operations - Reporting the Effects of
Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently
Occurring Events and Transactions," for the disposal of a segment of a business.
Adoption  of  SFAS  No.  144  does  not  have a material impact on the Company's
financial  statements.

In May 2002, the Board issued SFAS No. 145, Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4,
44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections ("SFAS
145").  SFAS  145  rescinds  the  automatic  treatment  of  gains or losses from
extinguishments  of  debt  as  extraordinary  unless  they meet the criteria for
extraordinary  items as outlined in APB Opinion No. 30, Reporting the Results of
Operations,  Reporting  the  Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and
Extraordinary,  Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions. SFAS
145 also requires sale-leaseback accounting for certain lease modifications that
have  economic effects that are similar to sale-leaseback transactions and makes
various technical corrections to existing pronouncements. The provisions of SFAS
145 related to the rescission of FASB Statement 4 are effective for fiscal years
beginning  after  May  15,  2002,  with  early  adoption  encouraged.  All other
provisions  of  SFAS  145 are effective for transactions occurring after May 15,
2002,  with  early  adoption  encouraged.  The  Company does not anticipate that
adoption  of  SFAS  145 will have a material effect on its earnings or financial
position.

In  June  2002,  the  FASB issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated
with   Exit  or  Disposal   Activities."   This  statement  addresses  financial
accounting  and  reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities
and  nullifies  Emerging  Issues  Task Force ("EITF") Issue No. 94-3, "Liability
Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an
Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)."  This statement
requires  that  a  liability  for  a  cost  associated  with an exit or disposal

                                       21
<PAGE>
                          CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                          (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


activity be recognized when the liability is incurred.  Under EITF Issue 94-3, a
liability  for  an  exit  cost,  as  defined,  was  recognized at the date of an
entity's  commitment  to  an  exit  plan.  The  provisions of this statement are
effective  for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31,
2002  with earlier application encouraged.  The Company does not expect adoption
of  SFAS No. 146 to have a material impact, if any, on its financial position or
results  of  operations.

3.     GOING  CONCERN

The  accompanying  financial  statements  have  been prepared in conformity with
generally  accepted  accounting principles which contemplate continuation of the
Company  as  a  going  concern.  However, the Company's did not earn any revenue
during  the  year ended June 30, 2002 and the Company has accumulated deficit of
$2,758,565  at  June  30, 2002, including a net loss of $478,229 during the year
ended June 30, 2002. The continuing losses have adversely affected the liquidity
of  the  Company.  Losses are expected to continue for the immediate future. The
Company  faces  continuing significant business risks, including but not limited
to,  its  ability to maintain vendor and supplier relationships by making timely
payments  when  due.

In view of the matters described in the preceding paragraph, recoverability of a
major  portion  of  the recorded asset amounts shown in the accompanying balance
sheet  is  dependent  upon continued operations of the Company, which in turn is
dependent  upon  the  Company's  ability  to  raise  additional  capital, obtain
financing  and to succeed in its future operations.  The financial statements do
not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of
recorded  asset  amounts or amounts and classification of liabilities that might
be  necessary  should  the  Company  be  unable  to continue as a going concern.

Management  has  taken the following steps to revise its operating and financial
requirements,  which  it believes are sufficient to provide the Company with the
ability  to continue as a going concern.  Management devoted considerable effort
from  inception  through  the  year  ended  June 30, 2002, towards (i) obtaining
additional equity (ii) management of accrued expenses and accounts payable (iii)
evaluation  of  its  distribution  and  marketing  methods.

Management  believes  that  the above actions will allow the Company to continue
operations  through  the  next  fiscal  year.

4.     EQUIPMENT
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        June  30,  2002
                                                        ---------------
<S>                                                        <C>
                 Equipment                                 $  12,910
                 Less:  Accumulated  depreciation             12,007
                                                           ---------
                                                           $     903
                                                           =========
</TABLE>

5.     PREPAID  EXPENSES

The  Company  entered   into  software  license  agreements  with  two  Delaware
Corporations.  One  Corporation granted permission to the Company to utilize its
software  for  the  "PCA  "  development.  The  corporation was paid $202,500 as
initial  non-refundable license fee and was considered to be pre-paid royalties.
The  agreement calls for Concierge, Inc. to pay a royalty of $1.00 for the first
million  units  sold  and  $.75  for  units  greater  than  1,000,000.

The  second  software  license  agreement  granted  the  Company  the  rights to
incorporate  its  software  in  the  Company's  personal communication attendant
e-mail  device.  The  corporation  was  paid  $42,500  by  Concierge,  Inc. as a
non-refundable,  advance royalty payment. The agreement calls for the Company to
pay  a  royalty  of $1.10 for the first 100,000 units, thereafter $.85 per unit.

                                       22
<PAGE>
                          CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                          (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


The  Company  amortizes the prepaid royalties by the amount which is the greater
of  the  amount computed using (a) the ratio that current gross revenues bear to
the  total  of  current  and  anticipated  future  gross  revenues  or  (b)  the
straight-line  method  over  the  remaining  estimated  economic  life.  Per the
guideline  under  SFAS  86  "Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to Be
Sold,  Leased, or Otherwise Marketed", amortization shall start when the product
is  available  for  general  release  to  customers.

The  term of licenses is five years from the date the Company begins shipping of
its  product.  The  prepaid  royalties  will be amortized based on straight-line
method  over  five-year  period  from  the  date  shipping  begins.

6.     NOTES  PAYABLE  -  RELATED  PARTIES

The  Company  has  notes payable to shareholders amount $5,000 due September 30,
2002  and  $8,000  due  February 15, 2003 with interest rate of 10% per annum on
both.  The  remaining notes payable to shareholders of $291,208 are non-interest
bearing,  unsecured  and  due  on  demand.

7.     INCOME  TAXES

No  provision  was made for Federal income tax since the Company has significant
net  operating  loss carryforwards.  Through June 30, 2002, the Company incurred
net  operating losses for tax purposes of approximately $2,480,000.  Differences
between  financial  statement  and  tax losses consist primarily of amortization
allowance, was immaterial at June 30, 2002. The net operating loss carryforwards
may  be used to reduce taxable income through the year 2017.  Net operating loss
for  carryforwards for the State of California are generally available to reduce
taxable  income  through  the  year  2007. The availability of the Company's net
operating loss carryforwards are subject to limitation if there is a 50% or more
positive  change  in  the  ownership  of  the Company's stock. The provision for
income  taxes  consists  of  the  state  minimum  tax  imposed  on corporations.

The  net deferred tax asset balance, due to net operating loss carryforwards, as
of June 30, 2002 was approximately $992,000. A 100% valuation allowance has been
established  against  the  deferred  tax  assets, as the utilization of the loss
carrytforwards  cannot  reasonably  be  assured.

8.     SHARES  OF  CONCIERGE,  INC.  ISSUED  SUBJECT  TO  CONTINGENCY

Concierge,  Inc.  (CI)  issued  117,184  shares  for  cash totaling $202,061 and
354,870 shares for services of $3,549 during the year ended June 30, 2000. Since
December 1998, CI sold securities to persons in six states in the U. S.  For the
reasons  stated  in  Note  9 below with regard to sales of securities during the
period  from  July  1 through September 15, 2000, which securities may have been
sold  without  the  benefit  of  an  exemption  from  registration, all sales of
securities  by  CI  from and after December 1998 until the merger with Concierge
Technologies,  Inc.  could  be  integrated  with  these  sales in 2000 and could
therefore be deemed to have also been issued without the benefit of an exemption
from  federal or state registration. Accordingly, all such shares are subject to
the  contingency  that  they may have been issued without the availability of an
exemption  from  registration  under  the  Securities  Act of 1933 and under the
securities  laws  of each of the six states.  Therefore, CI has treated all such
shares  issued   since  December  1998,  as   Common  stock  issued  subject  to
contingency.  Total  shares issued subject to contingency through June 30, 2002,
were  680,504  for  cash  and  services  amounting  $266,610.

                                       23
<PAGE>
                          CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                          (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


9.     SUBSCRIPTIONS  RECEIVED  FOR  COMMON  STOCK  SUBJECT  TO  CONTINGENCY

Concierge, Inc. (CI) entered into subscription agreements to issue "post merger"
shares  in exchange for cash. Through December 31, 2000, CI had received advance
subscriptions for a gross amount of $1,255,500 before deducting associated costs
of $79,710, for 5,928,750 post merger shares. Per the subscription agreement, in
the  event  the  merger  between  CI  and  the Company is not completed prior to
November  31,  2000,  the  obligation of the Company under this agreement may be
satisfied  by  the  issuance  of  shares in the Company equivalent on a pro-rata
basis  to  the number of shares in "post merger" Corporation that are subject to
this  agreement.

As  mentioned  in  Note  11,  CI  merged with the Company on March 20, 2002. The
Company  filed  a  registration  statement  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  ("the  Commission")  on June 8, 2000 related to the proposed merger,
naming  CI  as  the  entity proposed to be merged into the Company. From July 1,
2000  through  September  15, 2000, CI received additionally $487,500 as advance
subscription  for  2,127,500  post  merger  shares in an offering intended to be
exempt  from  registration  pursuant  to  the  provisions of Section 4(2) of the
Securities  Act  of  1933 and of Regulation D, Rule 506 of the Commission. It is
possible,  but not certain, that the filing of the registration statement by the
Company  and  the  manner  in  which CI conducted the sale of the 2,127,500 post
merger  shares  of  common  stock  constituted  "general  advertising or general
solicitation" by CI. General advertising and general solicitation are activities
that are prohibited when conducted in connection with an offering intended to be
exempt from registration pursuant to the provisions of Regulation D, Rule 506 of
the  Commission.  CI  does  not  concede  that  there  was   no  exemption  from
registration   available   for   this   offering.     Nevertheless,  should  the
aforementioned  circumstances  have  constituted  general advertising or general
solicitation,  CI  would be denied the availability of Regulation D, Rule 506 as
an  exemption  from  the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933
when  it  sold  the  2,127,500  post merger shares of common stock after June 8,
2000.  Should no exemption from registration have been available with respect to
the  sale  of these shares, the persons who bought them would be entitled, under
the  Securities  Act  of  1933,  to  the return of their subscription amounts if
actions  to  recover such monies should be filed within one year after the sales
in  question.  Accordingly,  the  amounts  received by CI from the sale of these
shares  are  set  apart  from Stockholders' Equity as "Subscription received for
common  stock  subject  to  contingency" to indicate this contingency. The total
contingent liabilities related to such shares amounted to $1,929,900 ($2,009,610
less  cost  and  expenses  of  $79,710)  as  of  June  30,  2002.

10.    SHARES  ISSUED  AND  TO  BE  ISSUED

During  the  year  ended  June 30, 2002, the Company issued 2,532,581 shares for
consulting  services  of  $$119,031. The Company did not issue any shares in the
year  ended  December  31,  2001.

During  the  year  ended  June  30,  2002,  the Company received a net amount of
$29,983 for 500,000 shares of common stock at $.06 per share, to be issued under
a  private placement. As of June 30, 2002, the Company has not issued any shares
for  the subscription received. During the year ended June 30, 2002, the Company
incurred  consulting  expenses  of $153,947 for which 3,275,472 shares of common
stock  will  be  issued.  All  of  these  shares  were  issued  in  August 2002.

11.    MERGER  AGREEMENT

On  January  26,  2000  the  Company  entered  into  an agreement of merger with
Concierge,  Inc.  (CI),  a  California  Corporation.  Under  the  agreement, the
outstanding  1,376,380  share  of  common  stock  of  the CI were converted into
96,957,713  common  stock  of  the  Company on the basis of 70.444 shares of the

                                       24
<PAGE>
                          CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                          (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


Company  for each share outstanding of the CI. The 96,957,713 post merger shares
were  distributed  to the shareholders of CI on a pro-rata basis. For accounting
purposes,  the  transaction was treated as a recapitalization of the CI, with CI
as  the  accounting  acquirer  (reverse acquisition), and was accounted for in a
manner  similar  to  a  pooling of interests. The operations of the Company have
been  included  with those of the CI from the acquisition date.  The Company had
minimal  assets  before the merger and did not have significant operations prior
to  the  merger.  The  merger  was  subject  to approval by shareholders of both
companies  and Securities and Exchange Commission. The merger was consummated on
March  20,  2002.

12.    SUPPLEMENTAL  DISCLOSURE  OF  CASH  FLOWS

The  Company  prepares its statements of cash flows using the indirect method as
defined  under  the  Financial  Accounting  Standard  No.  95.

The  Company paid $800 for income tax in the years ended June 30, 2002 and 2001.
Total  amount  paid for income taxes from September 20, 1996 (inception) through
March 31, 2002 amounted to $4,800. The Company paid $158 for interest during the
periods  ended  June  30, 2002 and $-0- for 2001. Total amount paid for interest
from  September  20, 1996 (inception) through June 30, 2002, amounted to $4,385.

The  Company  issued  2,532,581  shares  of  common  stock  for  consulting fees
amounting  $119,031  during  the  fiscal  year ended June 30, 2002. Valuation of
shares  is  based  on the estimated fair market value of the services performed.

The  Cash  flow  statements  do  not  include  effect  of  merger  with  CI.

13.    COMMITMENT

The Company sub-leases office space in Los Angeles, California from Ardent, Ltd.
The  term  of  the lease is 26 months with monthly payments of $1,542. The lease
expires on August 31, 2002. Rent was $18,504 and $18,501 for the year ended June
30,  2002  and  2001,  respectively.

Future  minimum  lease  payments  associated  with  the  lease  are  as  follow:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
           Twelve  months  ended  June  30              Amount
           -------------------------------              ------
<S>                                                      <C>
                        2003                             3,084
</TABLE>

14.    LITIGATION

Concierge,  Inc.  filed  a complaint against Emerald-Delaware, Inc. (ED), in the
superior  court  for  the  County of Contra Costa on March 9, 2001 for breach of
contract,  negligence, fraud etc in relation to development of its products PCA.
ED  filed  a cross complaint in the same court. The parties reached a settlement
on  October  9,  2001,  whereby  ED  agreed  to  compensate  CI  by $50,000. The
settlement  amount was received during the year ended June 30, 2002 and has been
reflected  as  settlement  income  in  the  financial  statements.

On  May  6,  2002,  a  default judgment was awarded to Brookside Investments Ltd
against, jointly and severally, Concierge, Inc, Allen E. Kahn, and The Whitehall
Companies  in the amount of $135,000 plus legal fees. The Company did not defend
against the complaint by Brookside, which alleged that Brookside was entitled to
a  refund of their investment as a result of a breach of contract. Brookside had

                                       25
<PAGE>

                          CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                          (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


entered  into  a  subscription  agreement with Concierge, Inc. which called for,
among  other  things,  the  pending  merger between Starfest and Concierge to be
completed within 180 days of the investment. The merger was not completed within
180  days and Brookside sought a refund of their investment, which Concierge was
unable  to  provide.  The Company has accrued the judgment amount of $135,000 as
litigation  settlement  in  the  financial  statements.































                                       26
<PAGE>
ITEM  8.     CHANGES  IN  AND  DISAGREEMENTS  WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
             FINANCIAL  DISCLOSURE

     Not  applicable.

ITEM  9.     DIRECTORS,  EXECUTIVE  OFFICERS,  PROMOTERS  AND  CONTROL  PERSONS;
             COMPLIANCE  WITH  SECTION  16(a)  OF  THE  EXCHANGE  ACT

     Set  forth  below  are  the  names,  and  terms  of  office  of each of the
directors,   executive  officers   and  significant   employees   of   Concierge
Technologies  at September 30, 2002 and a description of the business experience
of  each.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    Office Held       Term of
          Person                   Offices              Since          Office
<S>                       <C>                          <C>              <C>
     David  W.  Neibert   President  and  Director     06-2002          2003
     James  E.  Kirk      Secretary  and  Director     09-1996          2003
     Samuel  Wu           Director                     03-2002          2003
     Allen  E.  Kahn      Chairman, CEO, CFO and
                            Director                   09-1996          2003
     Patrick  Flaherty    Director                     08-2002          2003
</TABLE>

     David  W.  Neibert.  Mr.  Neibert  has  been  the  President  of  Concierge
Technologies  since  June  17, 2002.  Prior to assuming the duties of President,
Mr.  Neibert  was, and remains, a director of Concierge Technologies since 1999.
Mr.  Neibert  is  also  the president of The Wallen Group, a general partnership
providing  consulting  services  to  wireless communications companies and other
high  technology  firms  in  development  stages.  Prior  to founding The Wallen
Group, Mr. Neibert served as the president of Roamer One and Midland USA, and as
a  director  and  executive  vice  president  of  business  development of their
publicly  traded  parent  company   Intek  Global  Corporation.    Intek  Global
Corporation  manufactured,  sold  and distributed radio products globally to the
consumer,  government  and  commercial  markets  and  operated a nationwide land
mobile  radio  network  in  the  U.S.  Intek Global Corporation was subsequently
acquired by their majority shareholder, Securicor plc of Sutton Surrey, England.
Mr. Neibert reported to offices located in Los Angeles, California, Kansas City,
Missouri New York, New York, and Midsomer Norton, England during his tenure with
Intek  Global  Corporation  from  1992  until  1997.

     James  E.  Kirk,  Esq.  Mr. Kirk is Corporate Secretary and General Counsel
and  has  served  as  a  Director  of  Concierge, Inc. since inception.  He is a
graduate  of  Wichita State University and holds LLB and JD degrees from the law
school  of  Washburn University.  Mr. Kirk is an attorney in private practice in
Albuquerque,  New  Mexico.

     Samuel C.H. Wu.  With nearly 20 years of experience in engineering, banking
and  finance,  Mr.  Wu  has  played  a  pivotal  role in developing and managing

                                       27
<PAGE>
national  and international business activity relationships for organizations in
the  public  and private sectors.  He was a senior marketing/credit officer with
the  Bank  of  America  -World  Banking  Division in Tokyo, London and Hong Kong
before founding Woodsford Shipping & Trading Co., Ltd.  Under Mr. Wu's guidance,
Woodsford has become a preeminent firm in the area's import/export and financial
markets.  He  has  been  actively involved in the affairs of Concierge since its
inception.  Mr.  Wu  is  fluent  in  English,  Japanese  and a number of Chinese
dialects.  He  is a graduate of the University of California, Berkeley, where he
received  his  BSEE  in  electronics and computer sciences and MBA.  He has also
taken  advanced  studies  in  manufacturing,  quality  assurance  and  community
medicine.

     Allen  E.  Kahn.  Mr.  Kahn  entered  the  computer  industry  as a Systems
Engineer  with IBM and subsequently held a series of technical, sales, marketing
and  management  positions  with  other multi-billion dollar corporations before
becoming  President  and  CEO  of  two  companies  marketing data communications
hardware and software.  He has extensive experience in voice technology, optical
character  recognition,  data communications and other technical elements of the
PCA,  which  he  conceived.  Mr. Kahn is an honors graduate of the University of
Texas  at El Paso and pursued postgraduate studies in Business Administration at
UTEP  and  California  State  University,  Long  Beach.

     Patrick Flaherty.  Mr. Flaherty has been in the technology related business
for  over  30  years.  During  the  last  five  years,  he has been president of
Manhattan Resources, a consulting company specializing in Network Communications
and  Storage  Management.  In  late  1999  he  became  Senior  Vice President of
Concierge,  Inc., and served in that position until March of 2002.   Since April
2002,  he  has  resumed  his consulting business and was elected to the board of
Concierge  Technologies,  Inc.  in  August  of  2002.

     There  are  no  family  relationships  between  the directors and officers.
There  are  no  significant  employees of Concierge who are not described above.

     Section  16(a)  Beneficial  Ownership  Reporting  Compliance
     ------------------------------------------------------------

     Based  solely  upon  a  review  of  Forms  3  and  4 and amendments thereto
furnished  to  the registrant during its most recent fiscal year and Forms 5 and
amendments  thereto  furnished to the registrant with respect to its most recent
fiscal  year,  and  a  review  of  any  written  representations received by the
registrant  from  the  following  persons,  no  person,  who  was  at any time a
director,  officer  or beneficial owner of more than ten percent of any class of
equity securities of the registrant registered pursuant to Section 12, failed to
file on a timely basis, as disclosed in the above Forms, the reports required by
Section  16(a)  of  the Exchange Act during the most recent fiscal year or prior
fiscal  years.

ITEM  10.     EXECUTIVE  COMPENSATION

     The  following information concerns the compensation of our chief executive
officer  for the last three completed fiscal years.  No other executive officers

                                       28
<PAGE>

or  individuals  received  total  annual salary and bonus that exceeded $100,000
during  the  last  three  completed  fiscal  years.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 Shares of
     Name of Chief Executive Officer   Year    Cash Salary  Common Stock Awarded
<S>                                    <C>           <C>          <C>
     Allen Kahn                        2002          0                  0
     Michael Huemmer                   2002          0                  0
     Michael Huemmer                   2001          0                  0
     Michael Huemmer                   2000          0            302,001(1)
     Thomas J. Kenan                   2000          0                  0
     Herb Gronauer                     2000          0                  0
-------------------------
</TABLE>


(1)  The  value  of  the  302,001  shares  of  stock  awarded to Mr. Huemmer was
     $15,100  when  the  award  was made, based upon the $0.045 bid price of the
     stock  on  the  OTC  Bulletin  Board  the  day  the  shares  were  awarded.

     Other  than  as  stated  above,  no  cash  or  stock compensation, deferred
compensation  or  long-term  incentive plan awards were issued or granted to our
management  during or with respect to the period ended June 30, 2002.   Further,
no  member  of  management  has  been  granted  any option or stock appreciation
rights;  accordingly, no tables relating to such items have been included within
this  Item.

     There  are no employment contracts, compensatory plans or arrangements with
respect  to  any  director or executive officer which would in any way result in
payments  to  any  such  person because of his or her resignation, retirement or
other  termination  of  employment,  any  change  in control, or a change in the
person's  responsibilities  following  a  change  in  control.

 Long-Term  Compensation

     We  have  no long-term compensation plans or employment agreements with any
of  our  officers  or  directors.

ITEM  11.     SECURITY  OWNERSHIP  OF  CERTAIN  BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

     The  table below sets forth the ownership, as of September 30, 2002 of each
individual  known  to  management  to  be the beneficial owner of more than five
percent  of  the  company's  common stock, by all directors, and named executive
officers,  individually  and  as  a  group.

                                       29
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 Name  and  Address  of                      Amount          Percent  of
    Beneficial  Owner                        Owned              Class
 ----------------------                      ------          -----------
<S>                                         <C>                   <C>
Allen  E.  Kahn
7547  W.  Manchester  Ave.,  No.  325
Los  Angeles,  CA  90045                    24,988,135            19.8%

Samuel  C.H.  Wu
1202  Tower  1,  Admiralty  Centre
18  Harcourt  Road
Hong  Kong,  China                          20,355,437            16.1%

Polly  Force  Co.,  Ltd.
1202  Tower  1,  Admiralty  Centre
18  Harcourt  Road
Hong  Kong,  China                          10,805,680(1)          8.6%

East  Asia  Strategic  Holdings,  Ltd.
1202  Tower  1,  Admiralty  Centre
18  Harcourt  Road
Hong  Kong,  China                           7,395,137             5.8%

F.  Patrick  Flaherty
637  29th  Street
Manhattan  Beach,  CA  90266                 4,727,485             3.7%

James  E.  Kirk
1401  Kirby,  N.E.
Albuquerque,  NM  87112                      3,883,291             3.1%

David  W.  Neibert
24028  Clarington  Drive
West  Hills,  CA  91304                        715,876              (2)

Officers  and  Directors
  as  a  Group  (5  persons)                54,670,224           43.29%
</TABLE>

(1)  Mr.  Samuel  C.  H.  Wu  is  the  beneficial  owner  of  these  shares  and
     1,620,852  shares  held  by  Link  Sense  through  his  presence  on  their
     respective  Boards  of  Directors.

(2)  Less  than  one  percent.

     There are no agreements between or among any of the shareholders that would
restrict  the  issuance  of  shares  in  a manner that would cause any change in
control  of  the  company.  There  are no voting trusts, pooling arrangements or
similar agreements in the place between or among any of the shareholders, nor do
the  shareholders anticipate the implementation of such an agreement in the near
future.

ITEM  12.     CERTAIN  RELATIONSHIPS  AND  RELATED  TRANSACTIONS

     There  were  no  transactions  during  the  past  two  years,  or  proposed

                                       30
<PAGE>

transactions,  to which Concierge Technologies was or is to be a party, in which
any  director,  executive  officer,  nominee  for  election  as  a director, any
security holder named in Item 10 above and any immediate family member of any of
the  foregoing persons had or is to have a direct or indirect material interest.

ITEM  13.     EXHIBITS  AND  REPORTS  ON  FORM  8-K

(a)  Exhibits

     The  following  exhibits  are  filed  as  part  of  this  Form  10-KSB:

     Exhibit  No.                    Description
     ------------                    -----------

      2          -     Stock  Purchase  Agreement  of  March  6,  2000  between
                       Starfest,  Inc.  and  MAS  Capital,  Inc.*

      3.1        -     Certificate  of  Amendment of  Articles of Incorporation
                       of   Starfest,  Inc.    and   its  earlier  articles  of
                       incorporation.*

      3.2        -     Bylaws  of  Concierge, Inc.,  which became the Bylaws of
                       Concierge Technologies  upon  its  merger with Starfest,
                       Inc. on March 20, 2002.*

      3.5        -     Articles  of  Merger  of  Starfest, Inc.  and Concierge,
                       Inc.  filed  with  the  Secretary  of  State  of  Nevada
                       on  March  1, 2002.**

      3.6        -     Agreement   of   Merger  between   Starfest,  Inc.   and
                       Concierge,  Inc.  filed  with  the Secretary of State of
                       California on March 20, 2002.**

     10.1        -     Agreement  of  Merger   between   Starfest,  Inc.    and
                       Concierge,  Inc.*


     *Previously  filed with Form 8-K12G3 on March 10, 2000; Commission File No.
      000-29913,  incorporated  herein.

    **Previously  filed  with  Form  8-K  on  April 2, 2002; Commission File No.
      000-29913,  incorporated  herein.

(b)  Reports  on  Form  8-K

     Form  8-K  -     Item  2  -  Acquisition or Disposition of Assets; Item 7 -
Articles  of  Merger  of  Starfest,  Inc.  and  Concierge,  Inc.  filed with the
Secretary  of  State  of Nevada on March 1, 2002 and Agreement of Merger between

                                       31
<PAGE>

Starfest,  Inc.  and  Concierge,  Inc.  filed  with  the  Secretary  of State of
California  on  March  20,  2002;  and  Item 8 - Change in Fiscal Year (SEC File
#000-29913)  filed  April  2,  2002.

                                   SIGNATURES

     In  accordance  with  Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto  duly  authorized.

                                   CONCIERGE  TECHNOLOGIES,  INC.


                                   By:/s/  David  W.  Neibert
Date:  October  14,  2002             ------------------------------------------
                                      David  W.  Neibert,  President

     In  accordance  with  the  Exchange Act, this report has been signed by the
following  persons  on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates  indicated.



                                   /s/  David  W.  Neibert
Date:  October  14,  2002          ---------------------------------------------
                                   David  W.  Neibert,  President  and  Director


                                   /s/  Allen  E.  Kahn
Date:  October  14,  2002          ---------------------------------------------
                                   Allen E. Kahn, Chief Executive Officer, Chief
                                     Financial  Officer  and  Director


                                   /s/  F. Patrick  Flaherty
Date:  October  13,  2002          ---------------------------------------------
                                   F.  Patrick  Flaherty,  Director


                                   /s/  James  E.  Kirk
Date:  October  15,  2002          ---------------------------------------------
                                   James  E.  Kirk,  Secretary  and  Director


                                   /s/  Samuel  C.H.  Wu
Date:  October  13,  2002          ---------------------------------------------
                                   Samuel  C.H.  Wu,  Director


                                       32

<PAGE>
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In  connection  with  the  accompanying  Annual  Report  of  Concierge
Technologies,  Inc.  (the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30,
2002  (the  "Report"), I, Allen E. Kahn, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby  certify  that  to  my  knowledge:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m or  78o(d)); and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


                                       /s/  Allen  E.  Kahn
Dated:  October  14,  2002
                                       Allen  E.  Kahn
                                       Chairman  and  Chief  Executive  Officer


     The  above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350) and is not being filed as part of
the  Form  10-K  or  as  a  separate  disclosure  document.
















<PAGE>
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In  connection  with  the  accompanying  Annual  Report  of  Concierge
Technologies,  Inc.  (the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30,
2002  (the  "Report"), I, Allen E. Kahn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby  certify  that  to  my  knowledge:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m or  78o(d)); and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


                                           /s/  Allen  E.  Kahn
Dated:  October  14,  2002
                                           Allen  E.  Kahn
                                           Chief  Financial  Officer


     The  above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350) and is not being filed as part of
the  Form  10-K  or  as  a  SEPARATE  DISCLOSURE  DOCUMENT.