alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| 1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report. |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  March 11, 2011 |      /s/ David M. Bradley                        |
|---------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                            |      David M. Bradley                            |
|                            |      President and Chief Executive Officer  |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4596 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4596

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 28 (legislative day, June 7), 1994

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To designate the building located at 2200 North Highway 67 in 
  Florissant, Missouri, for the period of time during which it houses 
   operations of the United States Postal Service, as the ``John L. 
                       Lawler, Jr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The building located at 2200 North Highway 67 in Florissant, 
Missouri, shall, for the period of time during which it houses 
operations of the United States Postal Service, be known and designated 
as the ``John L. Lawler, Jr. Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall, with respect to the period referred to in section 1, be deemed 
to be a reference to the John L. Lawler, Jr. Post Office.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 27, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

PAUL EUGENE WHITEMAN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 163 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 24th day of July, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"2018-1813: Bd. of Trustees of Univ. IL v. Micron Technology, Inc. - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"2Z4CPsyUM9\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/12-03-2018-2018-1813-bd-of-trustees-of-univ-il-v-micron-technology-inc-audio-uploaded\/\">2018-1813: Bd. of Trustees of Univ. IL v. Micron Technology, Inc.<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/12-03-2018-2018-1813-bd-of-trustees-of-univ-il-v-micron-technology-inc-audio-uploaded\/embed\/#?secret=2Z4CPsyUM9\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“2018-1813: Bd. of Trustees of Univ. IL v. Micron Technology, Inc.” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"2Z4CPsyUM9\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Oral argument audio posted: Bd. of Trustees of Univ. IL v. Micron Technology, Inc. (mp3) Appeal Number: 2018-1813 To listen to more oral argument recordings, follow this link: Listen To Oral Arguments."}
§ 51.329 Notice of network changes: Methods for providing notice. ( a ) In providing the required notice to the public of network changes, an incumbent LEC may use one of the following methods: ( 1 ) Filing a public notice with the Commission; or
( 2 ) Providing public notice through industry fora, industry publications, or the carrier's publicly accessible Internet site. If an incumbent LEC uses any of the methods specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, it also must file a certification with the Commission that includes: ( i ) A statement that identifies the proposed changes;
( ii ) A statement that public notice has been given in compliance with §§ 51.325 through 51.335; and
( iii ) A statement identifying the location of the change information and describing how this information can be obtained.
( b ) Until the planned change is implemented, an incumbent LEC must keep the notice available for public inspection, and amend the notice to keep the information complete, accurate and up-to-date.
( c ) *Specific filing requirements.* Commission filings under this section must be made as follows: ( 1 ) The public notice or certification must be labeled with one of the following titles, as appropriate: “Public Notice of Network Change Under Rule 51.329(a),” “Certification of Public Notice of Network Change Under Rule 51.329(a),” “Short Term Public Notice Under Rule 51.333(a),” “Certification of Short Term Public Notice Under Rule 51.333(a),” “Public Notice of Copper Retirement Under Rule 51.333,” or “Certification of Public Notice of Copper Retirement Under Rule 51.333.”
( 2 ) The incumbent LEC's public notice and any associated certifications shall be filed through the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), using the “Submit a Non-Docketed Filing” module. All subsequent filings responsive to a notice may be filed using the Commission's ECFS under the docket number set forth in the Commission's public notice for the proceeding. If necessary, subsequent filings responsive to a notice also may be filed by sending one paper copy of the filing to “Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554” and one paper copy of the filing to “Federal Communications Commission, Wireline Competition Bureau, Competition Policy Division, Washington, DC 20554.” For notices filed using the Commission's ECFS, the date on which the filing is received by that system will be considered the official filing date. For notices filed via paper copy, the date on which the filing is received by the Secretary or the FCC Mailroom is considered the official filing date. All subsequent filings responsive to a notice shall refer to the ECFS docket number assigned to the notice.
[61 FR 47351, Sept. 6, 1996, as amended at 67 FR 13225, Mar. 21, 2002; 71 FR 65750, Nov. 9, 2006; 80 FR 1588, Jan. 13, 2015; 81 FR 62655, Sept. 12, 2016; 82 FR 61477, Dec. 28, 2017; 83 FR 2557, Jan. 18, 2018]
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
             (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
                          TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of MIV Therapeutics, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the
Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Form 10-Q") that, to the best of their
knowledge:

         (1) the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
         or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


                                                   /s/ Alan Lindsay
                                                   ----------------------
Dated: October 12, 2007                            Alan Lindsay
                                                   Chief Executive Officer


Dated: October 12, 2007                            /s/ Patrick McGowan
                                                   ----------------------
                                                   Patrick McGowan
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 337

_____________________________ O MAR M ERCER , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Gadsden County

. Barbara K. Hobbs , Judge

. December 19, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
R OWE , B ILBREY , and W INSOR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Omar Mercer, pro se
, Appellant.2 Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Barbara Debelius
, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
No. 11-6527.

#### Clayton *v.*Pennsylvania.

Sup: Ct. Pa. Cer-tiorari denied.
LIFE CYCLE COST OF PACKAGED SYSTEM CENTRAL A/C - SAMPLE CALCULATION (AVG VALUES), January 2000Dollar Values in 1998 $Elec Price(cent/kWh)Annual Cash Flow Cumulative Cash Flow Discounted Cash Flow Disc.LIST INPUTSAge Year Average MarginalBase Standard Diff. Base Standard Diff. Base Standard Diff.FactorELECTRICITY PRICE(cent/kWh)AverageMarginal1998 7.62 6.73ENERGY PRICE PROJECTION START YEAR Year of Purchase20067.08 6.26$2,607 $3,032$425$2,607 $3,032$425$2,607 $3,032$425Year Equip. Retires 2023 6.89 6.091 2006 7.08 6.26 $127 $117 -$11 $2,734 $3,148 $414 $2,729 $3,144 $414 0.962 2007 7.08 6.26 $127 $117 -$11 $2,862 $3,265 $403 $2,847 $3,251 $405 0.92BASE CASE DESIGN PRICE OPTION3 2008 7.06 6.24 $127 $116 -$11 $2,989 $3,381 $393 $2,959 $3,354 $395 0.88SEER 10CHANGESEER 134 2009 6.98 6.17 $126 $116 -$10 $3,115 $3,497 $382 $3,066 $3,453 $386 0.855 2010 7.00 6.19 $127 $116 -$10 $3,242 $3,613 $372 $3,170 $3,547 $378 0.82STANDARD CASE DESIGN Total Installed Price $2,607 $42516%$3,0326 2011 6.94 6.13 $126 $116 -$10 $3,368 $3,729 $362 $3,268 $3,638 $370 0.78Annual Repair & Maint. $70 $11%$717 2012 6.91 6.11 $126 $115 -$10 $3,493 $3,845 $351 $3,363 $3,725 $362 0.75Compressor Repl. Cost $278 $8229%$3608 2013 6.90 6.10 $126 $115 -$10 $3,619 $3,960 $341 $3,454 $3,808 $355 0.729 2014 6.93 6.13 $126 $116 -$10 $3,745 $4,076 $330 $3,541 $3,888 $347 0.69Annual kWh Use 806 -186-23%620 Payback10 2015 6.95 6.14 $126 $116 -$10 $3,871 $4,191 $320 $3,625 $3,965 $340 0.67LIFETIME (years) 18.4% SHIPMENTAnnual Operating Cost (years)11 2016 6.93 6.12 $126 $116 -$10 $3,997 $4,307 $310 $3,705 $4,039 $334 0.64DISCOUNT RATE 4.2% Comm.10%2006$127 -$11-8%$117 40.012 2017 6.93 6.12 $126 $116 -$10 $4,123 $4,423 $299 $3,782 $4,110 $327 0.61Resd.90%13 2018 6.93 6.13 $126 $116 -$10 $4,249 $4,538 $289 $3,857 $4,178 $321 0.59HOUSEHOLD ELEC PRICE IN 1998 Cumulative Cash Flow $5,207 $3156%$5,52214 2019 6.91 6.10 $404 $475 $71 $4,653 $5,013 $360 $4,085 $4,446 $362 0.57(cent/kWh)Average 7.62 Life-Cycle Cost ($) $4,365 $3398%$4,70415 2020 6.89 6.09 $126 $115 -$10 $4,779 $5,129 $350 $4,153 $4,509 $356 0.54Marginal 6.7316 2021 6.89 6.09 $126 $115 -$10 $4,905 $5,244 $340 $4,218 $4,569 $351 0.5217 2022 6.89 6.09 $126 $115 -$10 $5,030 $5,360 $329 $4,281 $4,627 $346 0.50HOUSEHOLD UEC(kWh)96518 2023 6.89 6.09 $126 $115 -$10 $5,156 $5,475 $319 $4,342 $4,682 $341 0.48HOUSEHOLD SEER 8.419 2024 6.89 6.09 $126 $115 -$10 $5,282 $5,590 $309 $4,399 $4,735 $336 0.4620 2025 6.89 6.09 $126 $115 -$10 $5,407 $5,706 $298 $4,455 $4,786 $331 0.4421 2026 6.89 6.09 $126 $115 -$10 $5,533 $5,821 $288 $4,508 $4,835 $327 0.4222 2027 6.89 6.09 $126 $115 -$10 $5,659 $5,936 $278 $4,560 $4,882 $323 0.4123 2028 6.89 6.09 $126 $115 -$10 $5,784 $6,052 $267 $4,609 $4,928 $319 0.3924 2029 6.89 6.09 $126 $115 -$10 $5,910 $6,167 $257 $4,656 $4,971 $315 0.3825 2030 6.89 6.09 $126 $115 -$10 $6,036 $6,283 $247 $4,701 $5,013 $311 0.36AEO 2000 - Reference Case2006Baseline (SEER=10)20% Impr. (SEER=12)Fuel PriceComparionShow PlotShow InputsUpdatePriceMultiplierMark Up'sSplit SystemRev Engr
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4490

To extend the Administrative Conference of the United States, and for other

purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 25, 1994

Mr. BRYANT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To extend the Administrative Conference of the United

States, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION.

4 The first sentence of section 596 of title 5, United

5 States Code, is amended to read as follows: ‘‘There are

6 authorized to be appropriated to carry out the purposes

7 of this subchapter not more than $2,600,000 for fiscal

8 year 1995, $2,700,000 for fiscal year 1996, $2,800,000

9 for fiscal year 1997, and $2,900,000 for fiscal year

10 1998.’’.
2

•HR 4490 IH

1 SEC. 2. CHAIRMAN’S COMPENSATION.

2 (a) EXECUTIVE SCHEDULE RATE.—Section

3 593(b)(1) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by

4 striking the period and ‘‘The Chairman is entitled to pay

5 at the highest rate established by statute for the chairman

6 of an independent regulatory board or commission, and’’

7 and inserting a comma and ‘‘who shall be paid at the rate

8 specified for level III of the Executive Schedule and who’’.

9 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 5314 of

10 title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding at the

11 end the following:

12 ‘‘Chairman, Administrative Conference of the

13 United States.’’.

14 SEC. 3. MEMBERS’ CAPACITY.

15 Section 593 of title 5, United States Code, is amend16 ed—

17 (1) in subsection (b)(6), by striking out the last

18 two sentences, and

19 (2) by redesignating subsection (c) as sub20 section (d) and by adding after subsection (b) the

21 following:

22 ‘‘(c)(1) The Chairman shall select the members of the

23 Conference authorized by subsection (b)(6) in a manner

24 which will provide broad representation of the views of pri25 vate citizens and utilize diverse experience. Such members

26 shall be members of the practicing bar, scholars in the
3

•HR 4490 IH

1 field of administrative law or government, or others spe2 cially informed by knowledge and experience with respect

3 to Federal administrative procedure.

4 ‘‘(2) The members of the Conference authorized by

5 subsection (b)(6) shall participate in the activities of the

6 Conference solely as private individuals without official re7 sponsibility on behalf of the Government of the United

8 States and, therefore, shall not be considered to hold an

9 office of profit or trust for purposes of eighth clause of

10 Section 9 of Article I of the Constitution.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Y3K Secure  Enterprises  Software,
Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"),on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending
December 31, 2003 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  (the
"Report"),  I, Leon  Caldwell,  Treasurer,  certify,  pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

/s/ Leon Caldwell
----------------------
Leon Caldwell
Treasurer
May 7, 2004
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4468

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to reduce certain restrictions

on the participation of proprietary institutions of higher education in

programs of student financial aid.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 20, 1994

Mrs. MINK (for herself, Mrs. UNSOELD, Mr. ROMERO-BARCELO ́, Mr. WILLIAMS, Mr. KLINK, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. PASTOR, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. PICKETT, Mr. MOLLOHAN, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. SKEEN, Mr. MARTINEZ, Mr.

KILDEE, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, and Mr.

HILLIARD) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

A BILL

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to reduce

certain restrictions on the participation of proprietary

institutions of higher education in programs of student

financial aid.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF LOAN FUNDS IN CALCULATION

4 OF 85/15 LIMITATION.

5 Section 481(b) of the Higher Education Act of 1965

6 (20 U.S.C. 1088(b)) is amended by adding at the end the
2

•HR 4468 IH

1 following new sentence: ‘‘For the purposes of clause (6)

2 of this subsection, funds received by an institution from

3 the proceeds of loans made to students or parents under

4 this title shall be considered to be funds of such students

5 or parents, and not to be funds derived from funds pro6 vided under this title.’’.

Æ
November 

### 29, 1974 The Honorable Joe Resweber County Attorney Harris County Courthouse Houston, Texas 77002
Dear Mr. Resweber: Opinion No. H- 463 Re: Construction ofArti,cle 42. 13. Tex. Code Grim. Proc., regarding fur- nishing offingerprints as a term ofprobation You have requested our opinion concerning the construction of section 5(b)(lO) ofthe Misdemeanor Probation Law, Tex. Code Crim. Proc., Article 42.13, which provides:

(b)
. . . The terms [of probation] must include, but are not limited to, the requirement that a probationer: (10) submit a copy ofhis fingerprints to the sheriff ’s office ofthe county in which he was tried. The clerk shall send such fingerprints to the Texas Department of Public Safety [for certifi,cation as to criminal record] s . . You ask whether the sheriff ’s office is responsible for taking the fingerprints and, if not, whether the probationer must procure the services of an expert to do so. Statutes are to be construed with reference to their general purposes and ends. Magnolia Petroleum Co
. y. Walker, 83S.W. 2d 929 (Tex. 1935); State V. ‘Habe* 146S.W. 2d 731(Tex. 1941);City ofMason V. West Texas Utilities Co., 237S.W. 2d 273 (Tex, 1951). The purpose of section 5(b)(lO) is to facilitate atrue exami,nation. ofthe probationer’s criminal record if any exists. A pre-requisite to the fulfillment ofthis purpose is atrue and adequate copy ofthe fi.ngerprinto. Not only must the fingerprints be

p. 2121The Honorable Joe Resweber, page 2 (H-463)

those ofthe probationer, but they also must be ofaquality adequate to allow an accurate comparison with those prints in the records of the Department ofPublic Safety. This degree of reliability may be most easily attained through the submission of a copy of fingerprints which have been taken by a law enforcement agency. It is therefore our opinion that the probationer may satisfy section 5(b)(lO) by either submitting a sufficiently authecticated and clear copy ofhis fingerprints or by making himself available for fingerprinting by the sheriff ’s office. SUMMARY A probationer may satisfy Article 42.‘13. section 5(b)(lO). Tex. Code Criminal Procedure, by either submitting a sufficiently authenticated and clear copy ofhis fingerprints or making himself available to the sheriff ’s office for fingerprinting. With respect to the latter, the sheriff ’s office has the duty to take the fingerprints. Very truly yours,

JOHN L. HILL Attorney General of Texas APPROVED:

LARRY F. Y RK, First Assista,nt 

## GM DAVID M. KENDALL, Chairman Opinion Committee

p. 2122
IIA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4571

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 20 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Received; read twice and referred to the committee on Governmental Affairs

AN ACT

To designate the United States Post Office building located

at 103–104 Estate Richmond in Saint Croix, Virgin Islands, as the ‘‘Wilbert Armstrong Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4571 RFS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The United States Post Office building located at

3 103–104 Estate Richmond in Saint Croix, Virgin Islands,

4 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Wilbert Armstrong

5 Post Office’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the building

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the Wilbert Armstrong Post Office.

Passed the House of Representatives September 19,

1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.