alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          11,388
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,975
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 626,491
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           92,550
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,140
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   626,491
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (189,697)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
167P16

#### State v. William Edward Godwin, III

1. State’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA15-766)

1. Allowed 05/09/2016

2. State’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

*2.*

3. State’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

3.
# DoD CIO’s 14th International Cyber Defense Workshop (ICDW), 10 - 14 June 2013

/ Published June 15, 2013

On June 10 &  11, 2013, Gil Duvall, (Engr., CISSP-ISSEP, CISM) Chair of the Cyber  Information & Integrated Operations Department, National Defense  University iCollege presented a webinar entitled, “The ART of Cyber  Security - Educating Cyber Warriors in a Strategy for Cyber Conflict  & Asymmetric Warfare” to the DoD CIO’s 14th International Cyber  Defense Workshop (ICDW).  Over 250 individuals from 20 countries  registered for the workshop.

The ‘ART of  Cybersecurity Strategy’ examines the role Attribution,  Rules-of-Engagement, and Trust Relationships play in the critical  thought process for military commanders and senior government officials  to establish cyberspace dominance as ‘strategic art’ for the 21st  Century. This concept works on the synergistic capacities of information  and knowledge principles; technology use and innovation; command &  control decision making; and transnational policies to define, use, and  defend the cyberspace domain. More than just technology, it defines the  essential role of leadership in a cyberspace strategy.  The workshop  examined how national priorities and functions of government influence  conventional military strategy and how conventional military strategy  must adapt for operations in cyberspace.  A case study of strategy  planning in USCYBERCOM was presented as well as the role modeling &  simulation plays in cyber strategy development.

The ICDW helps  facilitate international cyber security partnering between the U.S., its  allies, and coalition partners.  Held twice annually by the DoD CIO, it  is an education and awareness activity for military cyber security  practitioners to build technical skills and provides an opportunity for  registrants to collaborate with global partners with the common mission  to advance the cyber workforce and mitigate cyber threats.  Cyber  security professionals from academia, industry, and government act as  virtual instructors in global locations to deliver unclassified cyber  scenarios and scored attack & defend exercises in the areas of  computer network defense, incident response, digital forensics, and  cyber strategy formulation & development.
Exhibit 10.43

October 25, 2002

Via facsimile transmission to (925) 241-2403
               And by Federal Express to:

E-LOAN, Inc.
   5875 Arnold Road
   Dublin, CA 94568
   Attn: Steve Herz

Dear Mr. Herz:

Please consider this letter a Notice of Termination of the
Auto Loan Purchase and Sale Agreement (the "Agreement") dated June 5, 2000
between E-LOAN, Inc. (E-LOAN) and AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.
("AmeriCredit").  This termination is effective 30 days from the date of this
letter.



As you know, §6.21(i) of the Agreement provides in pertinent
part:



6.2    Termination.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement may be
terminated as follows:

(i) without cause by either party after expiration of the
Initial Term, upon not less than thirty (30) days prior written  notice to the other party;

Please be advised that the Confidentiality Provisions of the
Agreement survive termination of the Agreement.  I reiterate to you that
AmeriCredit considers any information related to its' (1) underwriting
guidelines, (2) program parameters, or (3) operations to be Confidential
Information that must not be shared with any current or future business
partner or E-LOAN.

Although the decision to terminate the agreement was based on
strategic and competitive reasons, AmeriCredit has enjoyed its partnership with
E-LOAN and wishes you and your employees continued success in your future
endeavors.

Sincerely,

AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

Georgine Muntz
                   Senior Vice President - E-Services

c:	Edward Giedgowd
     E-LOAN, Inc.
     5875 Arnold Road
     Dublin, CA 94568

---
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4589

To amend the Clean Air Act to provide for an optional provision for the

reduction of work-related vehicle trips and miles travelled in ozone nonattainment areas designated as severe, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 16, 1994

Mr. MANZULLO (for himself, Mr. HASTERT, Mr. CRANE, Mr. FAWELL, Mr.

HYDE, Mr. SANGMEISTER, Mr. EWING, Mr. FIELDS of Texas, Mr. ARCHER, Mr. WALKER, Mr. GREENWOOD, Mr. SANTORUM, Mr. DORNAN,

Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. HUGHES, Mr.

BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mr. DELAY, Mr. SAXTON, and

Mr. GALLO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Clean Air Act to provide for an optional

provision for the reduction of work-related vehicle trips

and miles travelled in ozone nonattainment areas designated as severe, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. OPTIONAL EMPLOYER MANDATED TRIP RE4 DUCTION.

5 Section 182(d)(1)(b) of the Clean Air Act is amended

6 by to read as follows:
2

•HR 4589 IH

1 ‘‘(B) The State may also, in its discretion, sub2 mit a revision at any time requiring employers in

3 such area to implement programs to reduce work-re4 lated vehicle trips and miles traveled by employees.

5 Such revision shall be developed in accordance with

6 guidance issued by the Administrator pursuant to

7 section 108(f) and may require that employers in

8 such area increase average passenger occupancy per

9 vehicle in commuting trips between home and the

10 workplace during peak travel periods. The guidance

11 of the Administrator may specify average vehicle oc12 cupancy rates which vary for locations within a non13 attainment area (suburban, center city, business dis14 trict) or among nonattainment areas reflecting exist15 ing occupancy rates and the availability of high oc16 cupancy modes. The revision may require employers

17 subject to a vehicle occupancy requirement to submit

18 a compliance plan to demonstrate compliance with

19 the requirements of this paragraph.’’.

Æ
#### § 32.6123 Office equipment expense.

This account shall be charged only with costs incurred in connection with the office equipment itself. The costs of operators of this equipment shall be charged to accounts appropriate for the activities performed.
Specimen common stock certificate of the Registrant



 Exhibit 4.1 
 

 
 Exhibit 4.1 
 NUMBER 
 BBND- 0001 
 INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 THIS CERTIFIES THAT 
 PROOF 
 is the record holder of 
 FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, $0.001 PAR VALUE PER SHARE, OF 
 BIGBAND NETWORKS, INC.

 transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this Certificate
properly endorsed. This certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar. 
 WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. 
 DATED: 
 XXXXXXX 
 SECRETARY 
 BIGBAND 
 networks 
 BIGBAND NETWORKS, INC. 
 BIGBAND NETWORKS INC. 
 INCORPORATED 
 SEAL 
 DECEMBER 3,1998 
 DELAWARE 
 SHARES 
 CUSIP 089750 50 9 
 SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS 
 XXXXXX 
 VICE PRESIDENT 
 COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: 
 MELLON INVESTOR SERVICES LLC 
 TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR 
 BY: 
 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE 







 

 
 BIGBAND NETWORKS, INC. 
 The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written
out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: 
 TEN COM – as tenants in common 
 TEN ENT – as tenants by the entireties 
 JT TEN – as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common 
 UNIF GIFT MIN ACT– 
 Custodian 
 (Cust) 
 (Minor) 
 under Uniform Gifts to Minors 
 Act 
 (State)

 UNIF TRF MIN ACT– 
 Custodian (until age) 
 (Cust) 
 under Uniform Transfers 
 (Minor) 
 to Minors Act 
 (State) 
 Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above
list. 
 For Value received, hereby sell, assign and transfer unto 
 PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER 
 IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE 
 (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS,
INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE) 
 Shares of the Common Stock represented by the within Certificate, and do(es) hereby
irrevocably constitute and appoint 
 Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with
full power of substitution in the premises. 
 Dated 
 XX 
 NOTICE :
THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME(S) AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. 
 SIGNATURE(S) GUARANTEED: 
 By 
 THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS,
SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
#### § 24.239 Cost-sharing requirements for broadband PCS.

Frequencies in the 1850-1990 MHz band listed in § 101.147(c) of this chapter have been allocated for use by PCS. In accordance with procedures specified in §§ 101.69 through 101.81 of this chapter, PCS entities (both licensed and unlicensed) are required to relocate the existing Fixed Microwave Services (FMS) licensees in these bands if interference to the existing FMS operations would occur. All PCS entities who benefit from spectrum clearance by other PCS entities or a voluntarily relocating microwave incumbent, must contribute to such relocation costs. PCS entities may satisfy this requirement by entering into private cost-sharing agreements or agreeing to terms other than those specified in § 24.243. However, PCS entities are required to reimburse other PCS entities or voluntarily relocating microwave incumbents that incur relocation costs and are not parties to the alternative agreement. In addition, parties to a private cost-sharing agreement may seek reimbursement through the clearinghouse (as discussed in § 24.241) from PCS entities that are not parties to the agreement. The cost-sharing plan is in effect during all phases of microwave relocation specified in § 101.69 of this chapter. If a licensee in the Broadband PCS Service enters into a spectrum leasing arrangement (as set forth in part 1, subpart X of this chapter) and the spectrum lessee triggers a cost-sharing obligation, the licensee is the PCS entity responsible for satisfying the cost-sharing obligations under §§ 24.239 through 24.253.

[62 FR 12757, Mar. 18, 1997, as amended at 69 FR 77559, Dec. 27, 2004]
**Exhibit 3.4**

**AMENDMENT TO BYLAWS**

On October 19, 2007, Bank of Florida – Corporation’s Board of Directors amendedthe Bylaws, so that Article VI, Section 1 now reads as follows: 

**ARTICLE VI**

**STOCK CERTIFICATES**

**Section 1 –*****GENERAL****.*The shares of the corporation shall be represented by certificates unless the board of directors shall by resolution provide that some or all of any class or series of stock shall be uncertificated shares. Any suchresolution shall not apply to shares represented by a certificate until the certificate is surrendered to the corporation. Notwithstanding the adoption of any resolution providing for uncertificated shares, every holder of stock represented bycertificates and upon request every holder of uncertificated shares shall be entitled to have a certificate signed by, or in the name of the corporation by, the chairman or vice chairman of the board of directors, or the president or vice president,and by the treasurer or an assistant treasurer, or the secretary or an assistant secretary, representing the number of shares registered in certificate form.
EXHIBIT  99.1
                                  HIV-VAC, INC.
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of HIV-VAC, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB/A for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Kevin  Murray,  the
Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,  hereby certify,  pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





                                                     /s/ Kevin Murray
                                                     ----------------
                                                     President and CEO
October 22, 2002





                                       21
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Defense General Services Administration National Aeronautics and Space Administration 48 CFR Chapter 1
[Docket FAR—2006-0023]
 AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration (GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
 ACTION: Small Entity Compliance Guide.
 SUMMARY: This document is issued under the joint authority of the Secretary of Defense, the Administrator of General Services and the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.  This 
                            *Small Entity Compliance Guide*
                             has been prepared in accordance with Section 212 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996.  It consists of a summary of rule appearing in Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC) 2005-12 which amends the FAR. An asterisk (*) next to a rule indicates that a regulatory flexibility analysis has been prepared.  Interested parties may obtain further information regarding this rule by referring to FAC 2005-12 which precedes this document.  These documents are also available via the Internet at 
                            *http://acquisition.gov/​far*.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laurieann Duarte, FAR Secretariat, (202) 501-4225.  For clarification of content, contact the analyst whose name appears in the table below. Item
Subject
FAR case
AnalystI
Local Community Recovery Act of 2006 (Interim)
2006-014
Cundiff.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Item I—Local Community Recovery Act of 2006 (Interim) (FAR Case 2006-014) This interim rule adds a local area set-aside to the FAR for debris clearance, distribution of supplies, reconstruction, and other major disaster or emergency assistance activities.  The contracting officer defines the set-aside area.  The rule implements the Local Community Recovery Act of 2006, which strengthens the government's ability to promote local economic recovery.  The local area set-aside does not replace small business set-asides.  Both can be used at the same time.  The rule imposes subcontracting restrictions when a local area set-aside is used.  No competition justification is required for the local area set-aside. Dated:  July 28, 2006. Ralph De Stefano, Director, Contract Policy Division.


[FR Doc. 06-6673 Filed 8-3-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6820-EP-S
§ 54.723 Standard of review. ( a ) The Wireline Competition Bureau shall conduct *de novo* review of request for review of decisions issue by the Administrator.
( b ) The Federal Communications Commission shall conduct *de novo* review of requests for review of decisions by the Administrator that involve novel questions of fact, law, or policy; provided, however, that the Commission shall not conduct *de novo* review of decisions issued by the Wireline Competition Bureau under delegated authority.
[67 FR 13228, Mar. 21, 2002]
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Community Bank Corporation of America (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the Report), I, Kenneth P. Cherven, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the Report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |     |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 13, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ Kenneth P. Cherven               
|                      |  |     |  | Kenneth P. Cherven,                  
|                      |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>



                                                  Exhibit  23.1
                                                  -------------

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We  consent  to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
American  Wagering, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-89494) and Form S-8 (File No.
333-27395) of our reports dated April 8, 2003, on our audits of the consolidated
financial  statements of American Wagering, Inc. and Subsidiaries as January 31,
2003  and  2002,  and for the years then ended, which report is included in this
Annual  Report  on  Form  10-KSB.

PIERCY,  BOWLER,  TAYLOR  &  KERN
Certified  Public  Accountants  and  Business  Advisors,
A  Professional  Corporation


/s/ PIERCY,  BOWLER,  TAYLOR  &  KERN

Las  Vegas,  Nevada
April  21,  2003
Exhibit








CURTISS-WRIGHT CORPORATION
SAVINGS AND INVESTMENT PLAN
As Amended and Restated effective January 1, 2015
THIRD INSTRUMENT OF AMENDMENT
Recitals:
		
	1.
	Curtiss-Wright Corporation (the “Company”) has heretofore adopted the Curtiss‐Wright Corporation Savings and Investment Plan (the “Plan”) and has caused the Plan to be amended and restated in its entirety effective as of January 1, 2015.


		
	2.
	Subsequent to the most recent amendment and restatement of the Plan, the Company has decided to amend the Plan to provide for rollovers of distributions from the Curtiss-Wright Corporation Retirement Plan by terminated employees, effective October 1, 2016.


		
	3.
	Section 12.01(a) of the Plan permits the Company to amend the Plan at any time and from time to time.


		
	4.
	Section 12.01(b) authorizes the Administrative Committee to adopt Plan amendments on behalf of the Company under certain circumstances.


		
	5.
	Certain of the Plan amendments described herein shall be subject to approval by the Board of Directors.


Amendments to the Plan:
		
	1.
	The first sentence of Section 3.08 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:


Without regard to any limitations on contributions set forth in this Article 3, the Plan may accept from or on behalf of a Member who is then an Employee or, to the extent provided in this Section 3.08, a former Employee a Rollover Contribution in cash, consisting of any amount, excluding after-tax amounts and amounts received as a spousal beneficiary, previously received (or deemed to be received) by him from an “eligible retirement plan.”
		
	2.
	Section 3.08 is further amended by adding a new paragraph at the end thereof, to read as follows:


Effective October 1, 2016, the Plan will also accept a Rollover Contribution from or on behalf of a Member who is a former Employee of a distribution from the Curtiss-Wright Corporation Retirement Plan, provided such Rollover Contribution satisfies the requirements of this Section 3.08.


Except to the extent amended by this Instrument of Amendment, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.











IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment has been executed on this ____ day of __________________, 2016.




	
				
	 
	 
	Curtiss-Wright Corporation
	 

	 
	 
	Administrative Committee
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	By:
	 
	/s/ Paul J. Ferdenzi