alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 22.1025 Permissible communications.

Offshore central stations must communicate only with subscriber stations (fixed, temporary-fixed, mobile and airborne). Offshore subscriber stations must normally communicate only with and through offshore central stations. Stations in the Offshore Radiotelephone Service may communicate through relay stations authorized in this service.
46828.

#### DAY v. THE STATE.

(385 SE2d 412)

Per curiam.

After plenary consideration of this matter, it is found not to satisfy the criteria for the grant of certiorari and the writ is therefore vacated.

*All the Justices concur, except Smith, Gregory and Hunt, JJ., who dissent.*

*455Decided September 11, 1989

Reconsideration denied October 4, 1989.

*William H. Mills,*for appellant.

*Charles M. Ferguson, District Attorney, David H. Moseley,*Assistant *District Attorney,*for appellee.
```

[112th Congress Public Law 189]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 126 STAT. 1435]]

Public Law 112-189
112th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To eliminate unnecessary reporting requirements for unfunded programs 
  under the Office of Justice Programs. <<NOTE: Oct. 5, 2012 -  [H.R. 
                                6189]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Reporting 
Efficiency Improvement Act. 42 USC 3711 note.>> 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reporting Efficiency Improvement 
Act''.
SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF REPORTS FOR UNFUNDED PROGRAMS UNDER THE 
                    OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS.

    (a) DNA Identification Grants.--Section 2406 of title I of the 
Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796kk-5) 
is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(a) Reports to Attorney General.--''; and
            (2) by striking subsection (b).

    (b) Police Corps Program.--
            (1) Repeal of report requirement.--Section 200113 of the 
        Police Corps Act (42 U.S.C. 14102) is repealed.
            (2) Conforming amendment.--The Violent Crime Control and Law 
        Enforcement Act of 1994 is amended by striking the item relating 
        to section 200113 in the table of contents contained in section 
        2 of such Act.

    Approved October 5, 2012.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 6189:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 112-648 (Comm. on the Judiciary).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 158 (2012):
            Sept. 11, considered and passed House.
            Sept. 21, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
No. 11-5308.

#### Knights *v.*Stihl Inc. et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 5.403 Frequencies. ( a ) Licensees may operate in any frequency band, including those above 38.6 GHz, except for frequency bands exclusively allocated to the passive services (including the radio astronomy service). In addition, licensees may not use any frequency or frequency band below 38.6 GHz that is listed in § 15.205(a) of this chapter.
( b ) Exception: Licensees may use frequencies listed in § 15.205(a) of this chapter if the device under test is designed to comply with all applicable service rules in part 18, Industrial, Scientific, and Medical Equipment; part 95, Personal Radio Services subpart H—Wireless Medical Telemetry Service; or part 95, subpart I—Medical Device Radiocommunication Service.
#### § 302-2.24 What requirements must I meet to receive a travel advance?

Your relocation travel authorization must authorize you to receive a travel advance.

[FTR Amdt. 98, 66 FR 58196, Nov. 20, 2001. Redesignated by FTR Amdt. 2011-01, 76 FR 18336, Apr. 1, 2011, and further redesignated by FTR Amdt. 2014-01, 79 FR 49644, Aug. 21, 2014]
No. 11-5355.

#### Richardson *v.*South Carolina.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Below please find the current online submittal form for the EROD
– . This will be changed when

we update the form to reflect recent organizational changes. Current online submittal form: http://w ww.ed.gov/erod
#### § 5.308 Stop buzzer.

A “Stop Buzzer” point of contact must be identified and available at all times during operation of each experiment conducted under a program license. A “stop buzzer” point of contact is a person who can address interference concerns and cease all transmissions immediately if interference occurs.

[78 FR 25162, Apr. 29, 2013]
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 151 (Monday, August 7, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44609-44610]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6706]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Extension of Comment Period on the Proposed Land Management Plans 
for the Bitterroot, Flathead and Lolo National Forest

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

SUMMARY: The Forest Service published a notice in the Federal Register 
on May 8, 2006 initiating a 90-day comment period on the Proposed Land 
Management Plans for the Bitterroot, Flathead and Lolo National 
Forests. The closing date for submitting comments has been extended to 
September 7, 2006.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent to: Proposed Land Management Plan, 
Bitterroot National Forest, 1801 North 1st St., Hamilton, MT 59840. 
Comments by e-mail should be sent to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#27504a575d67415409414243095254"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a6d1cbd6dce6c0d588c0c3c288d3d5">[email protected]</span></a>.

DATES: The comment period closing date has been extended, from August 
7, 2006 to September 7, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Claudia Narcisco, 406-329-3802.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of May 8, 2006, (FR 
Vol. 71, Num. 88, page 26734) the Forest Service initiated a 90-day 
comment period on the Proposed Land Management Plans for the 
Bitterroot, Flathead and Lolo National Forests. The closing date for 
submitting comments has been extended from August 7, 2006 to September 
7, 2006.
    Pursuant to 36 CFR 219.9(b)(2), the Bitterroot, Flathead and Lolo 
National Forests are asking for comments on their Proposed Forest Land 
Management Plans. The Plans are available for viewing and downloading 
at the Web

[[Page 44610]]

site: www.fs.fed.us/r1/wmpz. CD (Compact Disk) copies of the Plans have 
been mailed to persons on our current mailing list and are available to 
others on request. Plans are also available for viewing at Supervisors 
Offices and Ranger Stations on the Bitterroot, Flathead and Lolo 
National Forests.
    Please note that all comments, names, and addresses become part of 
the public record and are subject to the Freedom of Information Act, 
except for proprietary documents and information.

    Dated: July 31, 2006.
Deborah L.R. Austin,
Forest Supervisor, Lolo National Forest.
[FR Doc. 06-6706 Filed 8-4-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Antonio MEDLEY, Petitioner—Appellant, v. James PEGUESE, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 03-7689.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 27, 2004.

Decided March 19, 2004.

Antonio Medley, Appellant pro se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Antonio Medley, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find both that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cock-rell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Medley has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
§ 22.873 Construction requirements for commercial aviation air-ground systems. Licensees authorized to use more than one megahertz (1 MHz) of the 800 MHz commercial aviation air-ground spectrum allocation (see § 22.857) must make a showing of “substantial service” as set forth in this section. Failure by any such licensee to meet this requirement will result in forfeiture of the license and the licensee will be ineligible to regain it. Licensees authorized to use one megahertz or less of the 800 MHz commercial aviation air-ground spectrum allocation are not subject to the requirements in this section. ( a ) “Substantial service” is defined as service that is sound, favorable, and substantially above a level of mediocre service that just might minimally warrant renewal.
( b ) Each commercial aviation air-ground system subject to the requirements of this section must demonstrate substantial service within 5 years after grant of the authorization. Substantial service may be demonstrated by, but is not limited to, either of the following “safe harbor” provisions: ( 1 ) Construction and operation of 20 ground stations, with at least one ground station located in each of the 10 Federal Aviation Administration regions; or,
( 2 ) Provision of service to the airspace of 25 of the 50 busiest airports (as measured by annual passenger boardings).
[70 FR 19310, Apr. 13, 2005]
§ 51-9.303-2 Special requirements for medical/psychological records. ( a ) The Executive Director may require an individual who requests access to his medical or psychological record to designate a physician of his choice to whom he may disclose the individual's record if in the opinion of the Executive Director, disclosure directly to the individual might be harmful.
( b ) The Executive Director shall mark records which should not be disclosed directly to the subject individual and shall inform an individual requesting such records of the requirement to designate a physician to whom the records can be disclosed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0466

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

vs. 

CHRISTOPHER HORN,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including December 16, 2024, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 5 2024

10/07/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0466
#### § 22.527 Signal boosters.

Licensees may install and operate signal boosters on channels listed in § 22.531 only in accordance with the provisions of § 22.165 governing additional transmitters for existing systems. Licensees must not allow any signal booster that they operate to cause interference to the service or operation of any other authorized stations or systems.

[61 FR 31051, June 19, 1996]
No. 11-5556.

#### Stafford *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 5.121 Station record requirements. ( a ) ( 1 ) For conventional, program, medical testing, compliance testing experimental radio stations, the current original authorization or a clearly legible photocopy for each station shall be retained as a permanent part of the station records but need not be posted. Station records are required to be kept for a period of at least one year after license expiration.
( 2 ) For Spectrum Horizons experimental radio stations, the licensee is solely responsible for retaining the current authorization as a permanent part of the station records but need not be posted. Station records are required to be kept for a period of at least one year after license expiration.
( b ) For Broadcast experimental radio stations, the license must be available at the transmitter site. The licensee of each experimental broadcast station must maintain and retain for a period of two years, adequate records of the operation, including: ( 1 ) Information concerning the nature of the experimental operation and the periods in which it is being conducted; and
( 2 ) Information concerning any specific data requested by the FCC.
[78 FR 25162, Apr. 29, 2013, as amended at 84 FR 25690, June 4, 2019]
Argued January 7,

decided February 2, 1909.

#### MORGAN *v.*STATE.

[99 Pac. 422.]

From Linn: William Galloway, Judge..

Writ of review by Lee Morgan against the State to review a judgment convicting plaintiff of violating the local option law. Proceedings dismissed, and petitioner appeals.

Affirmed.

For appellant there was a brief and an oral argument by *Mr. John J. Whitney.*

For the State there was a brief over the names of *Mr. John H. McNary,*District Attorney, and *Mr. Gail S. Hill,*Deputy District Attorney, with an oral argument by *Mr. Hill.*

*161Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Moore.

This is a special proceeding by Lee Morgan against the State of Oregon to review a judgment of a justice’s court of Linn County sentencing him to pay a fine and costs for violating the provisions of the local option liquor law. The return to the writ of review, which was issued, sets out the facts in respect to the procedure adopted in the justice’s court, except that the motion to set aside the plea of guilty was not made until after sentence had been pronounced, and the transcript on appeal also shows that the judgment rendered by the circuit court of that county was almost identical to that described in the case of *Curran*v. *State,*53 Or. 154 (99 Pac. 420).

As the determination of that case is conclusive herein, the judgment dismissing the proceedings is affirmed.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 16 (Wednesday, January 25, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 4042]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-683]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[TD 9232]
RIN 1545-BD33


Guidance on Passive Foreign Investment Company (PFIC) Purging 
Elections; Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Correction to temporary regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to temporary regulations 
that were published in the Federal Register on Thursday, December 8, 
2005 (70 FR 72908) that provide certain elections for taxpayers that 
continue to be subject to the PFIC excess distribution regime of 
section 1291 even though the foreign corporation in which they own 
stock is no longer treated as a PFIC under section 1297(a) or (e).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ethan Atticks, (202) 622-3840 (not a 
toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The temporary regulation that is the subject of this correction is 
under sections 1291(d)(2), 1297(e) and 1298(b)(1) of the Internal 
Revenue Code.

Need for Correction

    As published, the temporary regulation (TD 9232) contain an error 
that may prove to be misleading and is in need of clarification.

Correction of Publication

0
Accordingly, the publication of the temporary regulation (TD 9232), 
which were the subject of FR Doc. 05-23630, is corrected as follows:
0
On page 72909, column 1, in the preamble under the caption heading 
DATES, lines 4 and 5, the language ``applicability, see Sec. Sec.  
1.1297-3T(f),1.1298-3T(f) is corrected to read ``applicability, see 
Sec. Sec.  1.1291-9T(K), 1.1297-3T(f), and 1.1298-3T(f).''.

Cynthia E. Grigsby,
Acting Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing 
Division, Associate Chief Counsel, (Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. 06-683 Filed 1-24-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 6- 24 97

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Ch arl es A. LaLibe rte ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v. Ch arl es E. Sam

ue ls , Jr., Dir ect orof B ur eauof P ris on s; Ch ris to ph er Ni ckren z ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an ts - App el le es

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Weste rnDis tri ctof M is so ur i - Kan sa s C it y

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Nov em

be r 29 , 20 16 Fi le d: Decem

be r 2, 2 01 6 [Unpubl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re SHEPHERD, ARNOLD, andKELLY , Cir cu itJu dg es .

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM. Ch arl es LaLib ert e ap pe al s aft er th e di s t r i c t co ur t di sm is se d hi s pr o se 1 co m pl ai nt
. Upo n care fu l rev ie w, we fin d no rea so n to rev ers e th e di sm is sa l or de r
The Hon or ab le St ep h e n R

. Bo ug h, Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e 1 W es te rnDis tri ctof M is so ur i.be cau se , am on g ot he r reas on s, we ag ree wit h th e di st ric t co urt th at it ha d no pe rs on al

juri sd ic ti on ov er de fen da nt s. See W or ld -Wide Vol ks wag en Co rp . v. W oo ds on , 44 4 U.S. 28 6, 29 1- 92 (1 98 0) (n on res id en t defe nd an t m us t hav e m in im

um co nt act s s uc h th at su it “ do es n o t o f

f en d tra di ti on al no ti on s of fai r pl ay an d subs ta nt ia l jus ti ce”) ; Mi ll er v. Nip po n C arb on Co ., 52 8 F.3 d 10 87 , 10 90 -9 1 (8 th Ci r. 20 08 ) (d e no vo rev ie w). Acco rd in gl y , th e jud gm en t of th e di st ric t co ur t is affi rm ed

. See 8t h Ci r. R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
                          REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) or
                    RULE 15d-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
          (AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

              I, Richard W. Lucas, as Chief Financial Officer of KSW, Inc., (the
"Company"),  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

         (1) the  accompanying  Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2006 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  March 14, 2007


                                                        /s/ Richard W. Lucas
                                                        -----------------------
                                                        Richard W. Lucas
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
No. 10-11277.

#### Holston *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 3d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4595

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 29 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

OCTOBER 8 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Committee discharged

AN ACT

To designate the building located at 4021 Laclede in St.

Louis, Missouri, for the period of time during which

it houses operations of the United States Postal Service,

as the ‘‘Marian Oldham Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The building located at 4021 Laclede in St. Louis,

5 Missouri, shall, for the period of time during which it

6 houses operations of the United States Postal Service, be

7 known and designated as the ‘‘Marian Oldham Post Of8 fice’’.
2

HR 4595 CDS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the building

4 referred to in section 1 shall, with respect to the period

5 referred to in section 1, be deemed to be a reference to

6 the Marian Oldham Post Office.

Passed the House of Representatives June 27, 1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
#### § 3.54 Notification of change in address.

The Commission must be notified in writing within 15 days of any change in address of an accounting authority. Such written notification should be sent to the address shown in § 3.61.
#### § 5.701 Applicable rules in this part.

In addition to the rules in this subpart, Spectrum Horizons experimental radio station applicants and licensees shall follow the rules in subparts B and C of this part. In case of any conflict between the rules set forth in this subpart and the rules set forth in subparts B and C of this part, the rules in this subpart shall govern.
§ 102-117.180 What transportation documents must I use to ship freight? To ship freight: ( a ) By land (domestic shipments), use a bill of lading;
( b ) By land (international shipments), you may, but are not required to, use the optional GBL;
( c ) By ocean, use an ocean bill of lading, when suitable, along with the GBL. You only need an ocean bill of lading for door-to-door movements; and
( d ) By air, use a bill of lading.
[65 FR 60061, Oct. 6, 2000, as amended at 75 FR 51394, Aug. 20, 2010]