alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001             MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          20,475                  22,593
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,928                   6,510
<ALLOWANCES>                                       317                     239
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,077                  31,464
<PP&E>                                           7,442                   5,790
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,932                   5,540
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  38,477                  36,564
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,262                   5,540
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            17                      16
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,714                  30,431
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    38,477                  36,564
<SALES>                                         12,065                  10,418
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,551                  16,890
<CGS>                                              346                     346
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,816                   4,761
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,820                  13,350
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   125                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (997)                   (595)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (213)                   (626)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (79)                   (225)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (134)                   (401)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (134)                   (401)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)                  (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)                  (0.03)


</TABLE>
#### § 25.301 Satellite Emergency Notification Devices (SENDs).

No device described by the marketer or seller using the terms “SEND” or “Satellite Emergency Notification Device” may be marketed or sold in the United States unless it complies with the requirements of RTCM 12800.0 (incorporated by reference, see § 25.108).

[88 FR 21442, Apr. 10, 2023]
#### §§ 25.405-25.406 [Reserved]
BRIAN QUINN

Chief Justice

JAMES T. CAMPBELL

Justice

PATRICK A. PIRTLE

Justice

JUDY C. PARKER

Justice

Court of Appeals

Seventh District of Texas

Potter County Courts Building

501 S. Fillmore, Suite 2-A

Amarillo, Texas 79101-2449

www.txcourts.gov/7thcoa.aspx

VIVIAN LONG

Clerk

MAILING ADDRESS:

P. O. Box 9540

79105-9540

(806) 342-2650

June 6, 2018

Darrell R. Carey

LAW OFFICES OF

DARRELL R. CAREY

300 15th Street

Canyon, TX 79015

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

James A. Farren

Criminal District Attorney

2309 Russell Long Boulevard, Suite 120

Canyon, TX 79015

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case Number: 07-17-00448-CR, 07-17-00449-CR, 07-17-00450-CR

Trial Court Case Number: 26976-C

Style: Jimmy Edward Henderson v. The State of Texas

Dear Counsel:

The following was filed Tuesday, June 05, 2018, in the captioned appeal:

Reporter’s Record (10 volumes)

Very truly yours,

Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

xc: Honorable Ana Estevez (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Barbara Younger (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

FILE COPY
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 4.1

                            SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE

     Reference is made to that certain Indenture, dated as of February 1, 1999,
by and among Oglebay Norton Company (formerly known as Oglebay Norton Holding
Company), a Delaware corporation ("Oglebay"), the guarantors party thereto and
NORWEST BANK MINNESOTA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee (the "Indenture").
Capitalized terms used without definition herein have the meanings given to them
in the Indenture.

          RECITALS:

     A.  Section 4.13 of the Indenture provides, inter alia., that "[i]f (a) the
Company or any Restricted Subsidiary shall organize, acquire or otherwise invest
in another Person that becomes a Restricted Subsidiary, or (b) any Restricted
Subsidiary that is not already a Guarantor shall become an obligor under the
Senior Credit Facility, then the Company shall cause such Restricted Subsidiary
to (i) execute and deliver to the Trustee a supplemental Indenture pursuant to
which such Restricted Subsidiary shall become a Guarantor..."

     B.  Oglebay Norton Management Company, an Ohio corporation, has become an
obligor under the Senior Credit Facility and a Restricted Subsidiary has
organized Global Stone PenRoc, LP, a Pennsylvania limited partnership, and
Oglebay Norton Management Company and Global Stone PenRoc, LP are Restricted
Subsidiaries and are therefore required to become Guarantors under the Indenture
unless they are designated as Unrestricted Subsidiaries;

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above premises, Oglebay Norton
Management Company and Global Stone PenRoc, LP agree, for the benefit of the
Holders, as follows:

     Effective with the date hereof, Oglebay Norton Management Company and
Global Stone PenRoc, LP each hereby expressly and fully and unconditionally
agrees to become a Guarantor under the Financing Documents.

     The laws of the State of New York shall govern this Supplemental Indenture
without giving effect to any conflicts of law principles thereof.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Supplemental Indenture
to be duly executed, as of April 3, 2000.

     OGLEBAY NORTON MANAGEMENT                   NORWEST BANK MINNESOTA,
          COMPANY                                NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

     By: /s/ Michael F. Biehl                   By:
        ---------------------                       --------------------
          Michael F. Biehl                      Title:
          Treasurer                                   ------------------

     GLOBAL STONE PENROC, LP
     By: GS PC, Inc., its general partner

     By: /s/ Michael F. Biehl
         --------------------
          Michael F. Biehl
          Treasurer
###### Editorial Note on Part 36

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 74 FR 23956, May 22, 2009, 77 FR 30411, May 23, 2012, 82 FR 25538, June 2, 2017, and corrected at 83 FR 4153, Jan. 30, 2018. Nomenclature changes to part 36 also appear at 83 FR 63587, Dec. 11, 2018, and 84 FR 4360, Feb. 15, 2019.

#### § 36.301 Section arrangement.

This subpart is arranged in sections as follows:

| General | 36.301 and36.302. |
| --- | --- |
| Plant Specific Operations Expenses: | |
| General | 36.310. |
| Network Support/General Support Expenses—Accounts 6110 and 6120 | 36.311. |
| Central Office Expenses—Accounts 6210, 6220, 6230 | 36.321. |
| Information Origination/Termination Expenses—Account 6310 | 36.331. |
| Cable and Wire Facilities Expenses—Account 6410 | 36.341. |
| Plant Nonspecific Operations Expenses: | |
| General | 36.351. |
| Other Property Plant and Equipment Expenses—Account 6510 | 36.352. |
| Network Operations Expenses—Account 6530 | 36.353. |
| Access Expenses—Account 6540 | 36.354. |
| Depreciation and Amortization Expenses—Account 6560 | 36.361. |
| Customer Operations Expenses: | |
| General | 36.371. |
| Marketing—Account 6610 | 36.372. |
| Services—Account 6620 | 36.373. |
| Telephone Operator Services | 36.374. |
| Published Directory Listing | 36.375. |
| All Other | 36.376. |
| Category 1—Local Bus. Office Expense | 36.377. |
| Category 2—Customer Services (Revenue Accounting) | 36.378. |
| Message Processing Expense | 36.379. |
| Other Billing and Collecting Expense | 36.380. |
| Carrier Access Charge Billing and Collecting Expense | 36.381. |
| Category 3—All other Customer Service Expense | 36.382. |
| Corporate Operations Expenses: | |
| General | 36.391. |
| General and Administrative Expenses—Account 6720 | 36.392. |
| Operating Taxes—Account 7200 | 36.411 and 36.412. |
| Equal Access Expenses | 36.421. |

[69 FR 12551, Mar. 17, 2004, as amended at 83 FR 63585, Dec. 11, 2018]
|        | **Exhibit  23**      |
|--------|----------------------|
|   | 400 Capitol Mall     |
|   | Sacramento, CA 95814 |
|        |                      |  |

** **

** **

** **

** **

**IndependentAuditors’ Consent**

 

 

 

 

The Board of DirectorsCapital Corp of the West:

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registrationstatement (No. 333-41440) on Form S-8 of Capital Corp of the West ofour report dated January 25, 2002, relating to the consolidated balance sheetsof Capital Corp of the West and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000,and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, shareholders’equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period endedDecember 31, 2001, which report appears in the December 31, 2001, annual reporton Form 10-K of Capital Corp of the West.

 

 
|                      |  |   |
|---------------------------|--|--------|
| San Francisco, California |
| March 25, 2002            |

 

 

 

 

 

 

KPMG, LLP. KPMG LLP, a limited liabilitypartnership, is

a member of KPMG International, a Swissassociation.

 

 

1

----
Exhibit 10.16(d)


 


THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE


MINERALS TECHNOLOGIES INC. SUPPLEMENTAL SAVINGS PLAN


(AS AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 31, 2008)







WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 15 of the Minerals Technologies Inc. Supplemental Savings Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective December 31, 2008) (the “Plan”), Minerals Technologies Inc. (the “Company”) reserves the right to amend the Plan by action of its Board of Directors or its delegate and now wishes to do so by the following amendment.







NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows, effective as of January 1, 2017:







1.             Section 5 shall be amended to read as follows:







“SECTION 5. ADDITIONAL DEFERRALS







In addition to the deferrals provided for in Section 4, a Participant may elect to defer from 1% to 50% of his or her Bonus Compensation for a Plan Year by filing an election with the Administrator pursuant to Section 6.  No matching contributions shall be credited with respect to deferrals under this Section 5.”







2.             The second paragraph of Section 6 shall be amended to read as follows:







“Elections under the preceding paragraph shall be binding and irrevocable after December 31 of the Plan Year in which they must be filed. However, any election so made shall not apply to any subsequent Plan Year, and thus a new election must be filed for any subsequent Plan Year on or before November 30 (or such other date not later than December 31 that the Administrator may specify) of the immediately preceding Plan Year. Notwithstanding the foregoing, subject to the provisions of Section 409A of the Code, a Participant who first becomes eligible to participate in the Plan after the beginning of a Plan Year by reason of being hired by the Employer on or after January 1 of a Plan Year shall be entitled to make a deferral election under Section 4 with respect to Base Salary Compensation to be earned after the date of the election within thirty days of becoming eligible.”







[Signature Page to Follow]


 











IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company, by its duly authorized officers, has caused this Third Amendment to be executed, on this 16th day of December, 2016.







	 	
MINERALS TECHNOLOGIES INC.

	 
	 	 	 
	 	
BY: /s/ Thomas J. Meek

	 
	 	
Thomas J. Meek

	 
	 	
Vice President and General Counsel
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of MDI Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company")on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 12, 2004 (the "Periodic
report"), I, Thomas K. Andrew, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d);
        and

    2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.


/S/ Thomas K. Andrew

Thomas K. Andrew
Chief Financial Officer
November 12, 2004



                                       20
#### § 3.62 Request for confidentiality.

Applicants should comply with § 0.459 of this chapter when requesting confidentiality and cannot assume that it will be offered automatically.
No. 11-5496.

#### Shealey *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 27.601 Authority and coordination requirements. ( a ) Subject to the provisions of § 27.2(b), a Guard Band licensee may allow a spectrum lessee, pursuant to a spectrum lease arrangement under part 1, subpart X of this chapter, to construct and operate stations at any available site within the licensed area and on any channel for which the Guard Band licensee is licensed, provided such stations comply with Commission Rules and coordination requirements.
( b ) Subject to the provisions of § 27.2(b), a Guard Band licensee may allow a spectrum lessee, pursuant to a spectrum lease arrangement under part 1, subpart X of this chapter, to delete, move or change the operating parameters of any of the user's stations that are covered under the Guard Band licensee's authorization without prior Commission approval, provided such stations comply with Commission Rules and coordination requirements.
( c ) *Frequency coordination.* ( 1 ) A Guard Band licensee, or a spectrum lessee operating at 775-776 MHz and 805-806 MHz pursuant to a spectrum lease arrangement under §§ 1.9030 and 1.9035 of this chapter, must notify Commission-recognized public safety frequency coordinators for the 700 MHz Public Safety band and adjacent-area Guard Band licensees within one business day after the licensee or the spectrum lessee has: ( i ) Coordinated a new station or modification of an existing station; or
( ii ) Filed an application for an individual station license with the Commission.
( 2 ) The notification required in paragraph (c)(1) of this section must include, at a minimum— ( i ) The frequency or frequencies coordinated;
( ii ) Antenna location and height;
( iii ) Type of emission;
( iv ) Effective radiated power;
( v ) A description of the service area, date of coordination, and user name or, in the alternative, a description of the type of operation.
( 3 ) In the event a licensee partitions its service area or disaggregates its spectrum, it is required to submit the notification required in paragraph (c)(1) of this section to other Guard Band licensees in the same geographic area.
( 4 ) Entities coordinated by a Guard Band licensee, or a spectrum lessee operating pursuant to a spectrum lease arrangement under §§ 1.9030 and 1.9035 of this chapter, must wait at least 10 business days after the notification required in paragraph (c)(1) of this section before operating under the license.
( d ) Where a deletion, move or change authorized under paragraph (b) of this section constitutes a discontinuance, reduction, or impairment of service under § 27.66 or where discontinuance, reduction or impairment of service results from an involuntary act subject to § 27.66(a), the licensee must comply with the notification and authorization requirements set forth in that section.
[72 FR 27712, May 16, 2007, as amended at 72 FR 48853, Aug. 24, 2007]
```

[112th Congress Public Law 184]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 126 STAT. 1424]]

Public Law 112-184
112th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To designate the new United States courthouse in Buffalo, New York, as 
  the ``Robert H. Jackson United States Courthouse''. <<NOTE: Oct. 5, 
                         2012 -  [H.R. 3556]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse at 2 Niagara Square, Buffalo, New York 
shall be known and designated as the ``Robert H. Jackson United States 
Courthouse''.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert H. 
Jackson United States Courthouse''.

    Approved October 5, 2012.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3556:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 112-456 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 158 (2012):
            July 23, considered and passed House.
            Sept. 21, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
No. 11-116.

#### Aera Energy LLC et al. *v.*Salazar, Secretary of the Interior, et al.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 15.35 Measurement detector functions and bandwidths. The conducted and radiated emission limits shown in this part are based on the following, unless otherwise specified in this part: ( a ) On any frequency or frequencies below or equal to 1000 MHz, the limits shown are based on measuring equipment employing a CISPR quasi-peak detector function and related measurement bandwidths, unless otherwise specified. The specifications for the measuring instrumentation using the CISPR quasi-peak detector can be found in ANSI C63.4-2014, clause 4 (incorporated by reference, see § 15.38). As an alternative to CISPR quasi-peak measurements, the responsible party, at its option, may demonstrate compliance with the emission limits using measuring equipment employing a peak detector function as long at the same bandwidth as indicated for CISPR quasi-peak measurements are employed.
( b ) Unless otherwise specified, on any frequency or frequencies above 1000 MHz, the radiated emission limits are based on the use of measurement instrumentation employing an average detector function. Unless otherwise specified, measurements above 1000 MHz shall be performed using a minimum resolution bandwidth of 1 MHz. When average radiated emission measurements are specified in this part, including average emission measurements below 1000 MHz, there also is a limit on the peak level of the radio frequency emissions. Unless otherwise specified, *e.g.,* see §§ 15.250, 15.252, 15.253(d), 15.255, 15.256, and 15.509 through 15.519, the limit on peak radio frequency emissions is 20 dB above the maximum permitted average emission limit applicable to the equipment under test. This peak limit applies to the total peak emission level radiated by the device, *e.g.,* the total peak power level. Note that the use of a pulse desensitization correction factor may be needed to determine the total peak emission level. The instruction manual or application note for the measurement instrument should be consulted for determining pulse desensitization factors, as necessary.
( c ) Unless otherwise specified, *e.g.,* §§ 15.255 and 15.256(l)(5), when the radiated emission limits are expressed in terms of the average value of the emission, and pulsed operation is employed, the measurement field strength shall be determined by averaging over one complete pulse train, including blanking intervals, as long as the pulse train does not exceed 0.1 seconds. As an alternative (provided the transmitter operates for longer than 0.1 seconds) or in cases where the pulse train exceeds 0.1 seconds, the measured field strength shall be determined from the average absolute voltage during a 0.1 second interval during which the field strength is at its maximum value. The exact method of calculating the average field strength shall be submitted with any application for certification or shall be retained in the measurement data file for equipment subject to Supplier's Declaration of Conformity.
[82 FR 50832, Nov. 2, 2017, as amended at 88 FR 47394, July 24, 2023]
#### Florence E. Martin *vs.*Antonio Martin.

JULY 17, 1946.

Present: Flynn, C. J., Moss, Capotosto, Baker and Condon, JJ.

Moss, J.

This is a divorce proceeding in which the wife prayed for an absolute divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty, for the custody of an only child of the parties and for other incidental relief.

Following the entry of an interlocutory consent decree as to allowances, the case was heard, on its merits, on January 29, 1945, by a justice of the superior court; and on February 1, 1945, a decision was.rendered in favor of the petitioner for a divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty; and it was ordered that the custody of the child be awarded to her, subject to the right of the father to take such child with him on each Saturday from 1 p. m. to 8 p. m. It was further ordered that the respondent pay to the petitioner, until further order of the court,' $15 per week from February 1, 1945, for the support of the child.

By that decision the petitioner, in lieu of alimony, which was permanently waived, was awarded the sum of $1000, which was “to be placed in escrow” in the name of her counsel, to be paid to her upon the entry of the final decree. She was also awarded certain personal property in the home of the parties.

On July 12, 1945, the petitioner filed in the case a motion that the above-stated decision be modified and amended by awarding to her alimony, the use of the household furniture *81and effects formerly used by the parties, and the use of the home formerly occupied by them.

*Kirshenbaum & Kirshenbaum,*for petitioner.

*George Triedman, John M. Booth,*for respondent.

On November 8 and 9, 1945, the case was heard by a justice of the superior court on this motion to modify the decision; and evidence was submitted in behalf of the parties respectively. At the end of this hearing he denied the motion; and on November 20, 1945, a decree was entered denying this same motion. On the same day the petitioner filed a claim of appeal from that decree, on numerous grounds, which appeal is the only matter now before us in this case.

After a careful examination of the record, we are unable to say that the trial justice was clearly wrong in his ruling. In the argument before us in behalf of the petitioner, apprehension was expressed that the decree based on the decision of February 1, 1945, affects her property rights in certain real estate which belonged to her and her husband as joint tenants. We have examined that decision and the decree based thereon and find nothing in either of them which in any way affects such rights. Since they were not involved in that decree, she is not precluded thereby from protecting such rights in any manner permitted by law.

The petitioner’s appeal from the decree of November 20, 1945, is denied and dismissed, and the case is remitted to the superior court for further proceedings.