alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4660 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4660

     To authorize issuance of a certificate of documentation with 
 appropriate endorsement for the vessel SMALLEY 6808 Amphibious Dredge.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 27, 1994

 Mr. Goss of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred 
           to the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To authorize issuance of a certificate of documentation with 
 appropriate endorsement for the vessel SMALLEY 6808 Amphibious Dredge.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
    Section 1. Notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 
1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the Act of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 
289), and sections 12106, 12107, and 12108 of title 46, United States 
Code, as applicable on the date of this Act, the Secretary of 
Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation with 
appropriate endorsement for the vessel SMALLEY 6808 Amphibious Dredge, 
Florida, FL1855FF.
                                 <all>
```
# DoD UC2 Workshop

/ Published April 28, 2022
April 28th, 2022, 
On April 28, 2022, the DoD University Consortium for Cybersecurity Coordination Center (UC4) at the National Defense University College of Information and Cyberspace (NDU CIC) hosted the first UC2 Workshop. The physical location of the event was the Lincoln Hall Auditorium (Room #1230) on the first floor of Lincoln Hall at Fort McNair. Attendees included high-level Department of Defense officials and staff members, the NDU CIC Chancellor, the NDU CIC UC4 team, and presenters from seven universities with a National Security Agency (NSA) Center of Academic Excellence (CAE) designation.
#### ALEXANDER et al. v. FROST LUMBER INDUSTRIES, Inc., et al.

No. 13341.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 13, 1951.

J. Edwin Smith, Houston, Tex., Wellborn Jack, Shreveport, La., for appellants.

Percy N. Browne, Shreveport, La., for appellees.

Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and McCORD and BORAH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The suit was for damages received in an automobile collision with a truck driven by one Vannie Gilbert. On defendants’ motion for summary judgment, the district judge, holding that, on the undisputed facts, Gilbert was not an employee of either of the defendants but of one Herman H. Jones, who was not an employee of defendants but an independent contractor engaged as such in logging operations under a contract with one of them, gave judgment for defendants, dismissing the complaint.

Plaintiffs, appealing from that judgment, are here presenting one question for our decision, whether or not Herman Jones was an independent contractor in his dealings with defendant Frost Lumber Industries,. Inc., of Missouri, or whether or not he war an employee of such defendant.

The district judge, in a carefully worded and thoughtful opinion,1 in which he set out the undisputed facts and analyzed the Louisiana cases, gave full consideration to the contentions on both sides and reached a conclusion as to the state of the law in Louisiana, with which we agree.

We are of the opinion that we can add nothing useful to the discussion by writing further on the point the opinion dealt with. It will be sufficient to say that we agree with, and make this opinion our own, and that the judgment must, therefore, be affirmed.

Affirmed.

1

. Alexander v. Frost Lumber Industries, Inc., D.C., 88 F.Supp. 516.
#### § 17.57 Report of radio transmitting antenna construction, alteration, and/or removal.

The owner of an antenna structure for which an Antenna Structure Registration Number has been obtained must notify the Commission within 5 days of completion of construction by filing FCC Form 854-R and/or dismantlement by filing FCC Form 854. The owner must also notify the Commission within 5 days of any change in structure height or change in ownership information by filing FCC Form 854. FCC Forms 854 and 854-R, and all related amendments, modifications, and attachments, shall be filed electronically.

[85 FR 85532, Dec. 29, 2020]
No. 11-9718.

#### Ballew *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.1



Cardinal Health
Deferred Compensation Plan
Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2016


First Amendment


Background Information


		
	A.
	Cardinal Health, Inc. (“Cardinal Health”) established and maintains the Cardinal Health Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) for the benefit of participants and their beneficiaries.




		
	B.
	The Benefits Policy Committee of Cardinal Health (the “Committee”) has been delegated authority to amend the Plan.




		
	C.
	The Committee desires to amend the Plan in order to clarify that a participant’s deemed investment in common shares of Cardinal Health does not create with respect to the participant any ownership or voting rights in such shares.




		
	D.
	The Committee further desires to amend the Plan to make certain clarifications to reflect the Plan’s operation.




		
	E.
	Section 7.1 of the Plan permits the amendment of the Plan at any time.




Amendment of the Plan


The Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective immediately:


		
	1.
	Section 2.2 of the Plan, “Specific Conditions for Active Participation” is hereby amended to replace the term “Social Security Matching Credit” with the phrase “Social Security Supplement Credit (as defined in Section 3.3 herein)” the first time it is used therein, and to replace the term “Social Security Matching Credit” with the term “Social Security Supplement Credit” each other time it is used therein.




		
	2.
	The first paragraph of Section 3.5 of the Plan, “Special Rules Applicable to Investments in Shares” is hereby amended to add the following sentence to the end thereof:




“For the avoidance of doubt, a Participant’s election to have any portion of his Account deemed invested in Shares shall not create with respect to such Participant any ownership or voting rights in such Shares.”


		
	3.
	Section 5.2 of the Plan, “Distribution upon Retirement or Other Separation from Service; Form of Payment” is hereby amended to delete the second to last sentence therein.




		
	4.
	Section 5.8 of the Plan, “Acceleration of Payment” is hereby amended to add a new subsection (f) to the end thereof to read as follows:




“(f)    Other Accelerations.  The Company may in its discretion accelerate any payment due under the Plan to the extent permitted by Code Section 409A and the regulations thereunder.”











		
	5.
	All other terms and provisions of the Plan shall remain unchanged.




	
			
	 
	CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.

	 
	By:
	/s/ Kendell F. Sherrer

	 
	Its:
	VP, Benefits

	 
	Date:
	12-19-16
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 155 (Friday, August 11, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 46189]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6891]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Sunshine Act Notice

Date and Time: Friday, August 18, 2006, 9:30 a.m., Commission Meeting.

Place: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 624 Ninth Street, NW., Rm. 540, 
Washington, DC 20425.

Status: 

Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda
II. Approval of Minutes of July 28, Meeting
III. Announcements
IV. Staff Director's Report
V. Program Planning
    <bullet> Record Items for the Briefing on Benefits of Diversity in 
Elementary and Secondary Education.
    <bullet> Outline and Discovery Plan for FY 2007 Statutory 
Enforcement Report on Elementary and Secondary School Desegregation.
    <bullet> Anti-Semitism Brochure.
VI. Management and Operations
    <bullet> Strategic Plan Performance Measures.
    <bullet> Memorandum of Understanding With Thurgood Marshall 
Library.
VII. State Advisory Committee Issues
    <bullet> Acting Chair for Maine State Advisory Committee.
    <bullet> Re-Charter Package for California State Advisory 
Committee.
    <bullet> Re-Charter Package for Georgia State Advisory Committee.
VIII. Closed Meeting To Discuss Personnel Matters
IX. Future Agenda Items
X. Adjourn

CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Audrey Wright, Office of the 
Staff Director, (202) 376-7700.

David P. Blackwood,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 06-6891 Filed 8-9-06; 11:36 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-M
46665.

#### TURNER v. THE STATE.

(379 SE2d 518)

Weltner, Justice.

Douglas Turner shot and killed his father with a handgun. He was found guilty of felony murder and was sentenced to life imprisonment.1

1. The sole issue in this appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence. The evidence shows that Turner shot his father following an angry confrontation. Turner testified that he killed the victim in self-defense. The victim had no weapon in his hand before the shooting. Turner left the scene of the homicide before police arrived and fled to the State of New York. Later, he surrendered to law enforcement officers and returned voluntarily to Georgia.

*256Decided May 25, 1989.

*R. Allen Hunt,*for appellant.

*Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Nancy A. Grace, Assistant District Attorney, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, Mary Beth Westmoreland, Assistant Attorney General,*for appellee.

2. Based on the evidence, a rational trier of fact could have found Turner guilty of murder beyond a reasonable doubt. *Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

1

 The homicide took place on February 4, 1987. Turner was indicted on February 13, 1987. He was tried and convicted and sentenced on July 8, 1987. Pursuant to an order dated August 25, 1987, Turner’s motion for new trial previously filed was considered timely filed. On December 9, 1988, the motion for new trial was denied. Turner’s notice of appeal was filed on December 6, 1988. The case was docketed in this court on February 8, 1989, and was submitted without oral argument on March 24, 1989.
#### Annie Gabrielle *vs.*Arthur M. Cottrell, Jr. *et al.*

NOVEMBER 26, 1948.

Present: Flynn, C. J., Capotosto, Baker, Condon and O’Connell, JJ.

*457Per Curiam.

The above-entitled case is before us on a citation to the respondents to show cause why the writ of certiorari should not be issued as prayed for in the petition. In the judgment of the court the respondents’ motion to dismiss the petition, regardless of its caption, clearly appears in the existing circumstances to have been addressed to the petition and to the issue whether, as of the date when such petition was filed, the court should exercise its discretion in issuing the writ pursuant thereto.

When the petition was presented for filing and the above-mentioned citation was issued, counsel did not call to the court’s attention the provisions of general laws 1938, chapter 163, §10, and chap. 164, §9, as recently amended by public laws 1948, chap. 2124, approved April 30, 1948. Under such statute as last amended the petitioner at the time of the filing of the petition for certiorari had the right and ample time to claim an appeal from the decision of the respondents to the liquor control administrator, and there to have a hearing *de novo,*if she desired. If that fact had been called to our attention, the court would not have ordered the issuance of a citation to the respondents to show cause because there then was available to the petitioner an otherwise express and adequate remedy to have the liquor control administrator review the respondents’ decision suspending her license.

For that reason it is the opinion of the court that the respondents’ motion to dismiss the petition for a writ of certiorari should be granted. Since this determination is controlling in the proceedings before us, it becomes unnecessary to pass specifically upon the petitioner’s purported demurrer to respondents’ motion to dismiss, or upon her motions to quash the return and to suppress the counter affidavits of the respondents.

*458
      *Frank S. Cappuccio, Louis B. Cappuccio,*for petitioner.

*John M. Dunn, Town Solicitor,*for respondents.

The respondents’ motion to dismiss the petition is granted and the petition is denied and dismissed.
#### § 51.219 Access to rights of way.

The rules governing access to rights of way are set forth in part 1, subpart J of this chapter.
To:

  

 ALFACOURSE INC.
 INVESTMENT CONFIRMATION
 

 The undersigned, intending to be legally bound, hereby irrevocably subscribes for and agrees to purchase __5,000,000__ shares of the common stock of Alfacourse Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), for a purchase price of $5,000.00, or $0.001 per share. Simultaneous with the execution and delivery of this confirmation to the Company, the undersigned is either delivering a check made payable to “Alfacourse Inc.” or sending a wire transfer payment to the Company’s account at:
 

 Bank Name: 
 Bank of America
 Phone:
 716-881-2915
 Bank Address:    495 Elmwood Ave., Buffalo, NY 14222
 SWIFT 
 BOFAUS3N
 Routing Number:  026009593
 Account Number: 483059013885
 Beneficiary Name: Alfacourse Inc.
 Beneficiary Address: 5660 Strand Court Unit #A3 Naples, FL 34110
  
 The undersigned further acknowledges that although the shares of common stock being purchased from the Company are registered securities under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, there may be restrictions on the resale of the shares imposed by the particular state law where the undersigned resides or in a jurisdiction outside of the United States. Accordingly, the undersigned will not offer to sell or sell the Shares in any jurisdiction unless the undersigned obtains all required consents, if any.
 

 The undersigned understands that an investment in the shares is a speculative investment which involves a high degree of risk and the potential loss of his entire investment. The undersigned is further aware that no federal or state agency has (i) made any finding or determination as to the fairness of this investment, (ii) made any recommendation or endorsement of the shares or the Company, or (iii) guaranteed or insured any investment in the Shares or any investment made by the Company. The undersigned understands that the price of the stock purchased hereby bears no relation to the assets, book value or net worth of the Company and was determined arbitrarily by the Company.
 

  December 8, 2016

 

 Date: 
 

 Amount of Investment:  $5,000,000.00
 Number of Shares:  5,000,000  
 

 	 	 	
	 1.
	 Print Full Name of Investor:


 OLEG JITOV

 	 


	 

	 

	 


	 

	 

	 First, Middle, Last

	 

	 

	 


	 

	 



 22 Cruagh Wood

 	 


	 2.
	 Permanent Address of Investor:
	 


	 

	 



 Stepaside, Dublin 18

 	 

 

 


	 

	 

	 

  Ireland

 


	 

	 

	 


	 

	 

	 


	 

	 

	 


	 3
	 Signature of Investor:
	 √    Oleg Jitov


 

 

 

 If Investor is an entity, provide copy of Articles of Incorporation, Certificate of Formation or other evidence of existence, as well as a copy of board resolution or other evidence of authorization to purchase the shares of the Company.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
                                                                      ----------


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
---------------------------------------------------


We have issued our report dated June 30, 1999, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of National Auto
Credit, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 1999.
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the
Registration Statements of National Auto Credit, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No.
2-93984, effective October 1, 1987, File No. 33-51727, effective December 28,
1993, and File No. 33-58579, effective May 31, 1995).


/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
July 27, 1999
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 446 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 446

  To grant a right of use and occupancy of a certain tract of land in 
Yosemite National Park to George R. Lange and Lucille F. Lange, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

  Mr. Lehman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To grant a right of use and occupancy of a certain tract of land in 
Yosemite National Park to George R. Lange and Lucille F. Lange, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GRANT OF RIGHT OF USE AND OCCUPANCY IN YOSEMITE NATIONAL 
              PARK.

    (a) In General.--Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary of the 
Interior shall grant George R. Lange and Lucille F. Lange a right of 
use and occupancy of the tract numbered 16-118 in Foresta, Yosemite 
National Park, California, for a term ending at the death of George R. 
Lange or the death of Lucille F. Lange, whichever is later.
    (b) Terms and Conditions.--The right granted pursuant to subsection 
(a)--
            (1) shall be for such use and occupancy of the property as 
        the Secretary of the Interior determines is reasonable;
            (2) shall be subject to such terms and conditions as the 
        Secretary of the Interior determines are necessary to ensure 
        that the right does not unreasonably diminish the scenic, 
        natural, historic, and other values for which Yosemite National 
        Park was established; and
            (3) shall be conditioned on the payment by the grantees of 
        an annual fee that the Secretary of the Interior determines is 
        reasonable.

                                 <all>
```
#### § 60-741.47 Sheltered workshops.

Contracts with sheltered workshops do not constitute affirmative action in lieu of employment and advancement of qualified individuals with disabilities in the contractor's own work force. Contracts with sheltered workshops may be included within an affirmative action program if the sheltered workshop trains employees for the contractor and the contractor is obligated to hire trainees at full compensation when such trainees become “qualified individuals with disabilities.”
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4450

To amend title 18, United States Code, to federalize the crime of child

molestation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 18, 1994

Mr. REYNOLDS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to federalize the

crime of child molestation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lock Out Child Crime

5 Act of 1994’’.

6 SEC. 2. CHILD MOLESTATION.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 110 of title 18, United

8 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow9 ing:
2

•HR 4450 IH

1 ‘‘§ 2259. Child molestation

2 ‘‘(a) Whoever knowingly engages in child molestation

3 where the child molested is 5 years or more younger than

4 the person so engaging, shall be fined under this title and

5 imprisoned not less than 10 years and may be imprisoned

6 for any greater term of years or for life.

7 ‘‘(b) As used in this section, the term ‘child molesta8 tion’ means a sexual act or sexual contact, as those terms

9 are defined for the purposes of chapter 109A of this title,

10 with an individual who has not attained the age of 18

11 years.’’.

12 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

13 at the beginning of chapter 110 of title 18, United States

14 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new

15 item:

‘‘2259. Child molestation.’’.

Æ
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report MIV Therapeutics, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended November 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Alan P.
Lindsay, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.

/S/ ALAN P. LINDSAY
-------------------
Alan P. Lindsay
President and CEO
May 20, 2005
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION Ill 1650 Ar ch St reet Phil a d elp hi a, P ennsylva n ia 19103-2029

Honorable Ben Grumbles, Secretary Maryland D epartment of the E nvironment 1800 Washington Boulevard Baltimore , Maryland 21230 Dear Secretary Grumb les: 

## MAR 0 3 2016

On J anuary 5, 20 1 6, the U.S. Environmen tal Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the Maryland State Impl e mentati o n Plan (S IP) from the Maryland D e partment of the E n v ironm e nt pertaining to F iberglass Boat Manufacturing CTG ru le [SIP R ev i s io n # 15-07]. E P A has determined that the s ubm i ttal is administra ti ve l y and technica ll y complete, and i s r ev iewing it to prepare a Noti ce of Proposed Ru le making (NPR) act ion
. If members of your staff have any questions , they may direct them to Christopher Cripps, Office of Air Prog ram Planning, at (2 1 5) 814-2179 , o r at c ripps.chri stop her@epa .go v. H e i s the prin cipal contac t for this rulemaking
.

E nclosure S inc e r e ly ,**~**

# JUVr<cP-~ Nikos Singelis, Acting Director Air Protection Divi s io n

cc : Brian 

### H. Hu g, Actin g Program Manager, Air Quality Plannin g

n tJ Printed o n I 00 % recycled/ recyclab l e pap e r with I 00 % post-consumer fiber andprocess chlorine f ree. Cus tome r Se r vi ce H o tline: 1-800- 438-2474
No. 11-9531.

#### Perez *v.*Stainer, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.