alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Updated Federal Circuit Rules of Practice and Fee Schedule - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"2xsJ6gzNUT\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/updated-federal-circuit-rules-of-practice-and-fee-schedule\/\">Updated Federal Circuit Rules of Practice and Fee Schedule<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/updated-federal-circuit-rules-of-practice-and-fee-schedule\/embed\/#?secret=2xsJ6gzNUT\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Updated Federal Circuit Rules of Practice and Fee Schedule” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"2xsJ6gzNUT\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"An updated version of the Federal Circuit Rules of Practice is now available on the court\u2019s\u00a0website (pdf).\u00a0 The update incorporates the December 1, 2020 amendments to Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 35 and 40, which do not impact the Federal Circuit\u2019s local rules or procedures. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 1913, the Judicial Conference of […]"}
Hoodia

© Steven Foster

This fact sheet provides basic information about hoodia—common 

names, what the science says, potential side effects and cautions, and 

resources for more information.

Common Names—hoodia, Kalahari cactus, Xhoba

Latin Name—Hoodia gordonii

Hoodia is a flowering, cactus-like plant native to the Kalahari Desert 

in southern Africa. Its harvest is protected by conservation laws.

Historically, Kalahari Bushmen ate hoodia stems to reduce their 

hunger and thirst during long hunts. Today, the main folk use of 

hoodia is as an appetite suppressant for weight loss.

Dried extracts of hoodia stems and roots are used to make capsules, 

powders, and chewable tablets. Hoodia can also be used to make liquid 

extracts and teas. Hoodia products often contain other herbs or 

minerals, such as green tea or chromium picolinate.

What the Science Says 

There is no reliable scientific evidence to support hoodia’s use. No 

studies of the herb in people have been published.

Side Effects and Cautions 

• Hoodia’s safety is unknown. Its potential risks, side effects, and 

interactions with medicines and other supplements have not 

been studied.

• The quality of hoodia products varies widely. News reports suggest 

that some products sold as hoodia do not contain any hoodia.

• Tell all your health care providers about any complementary health 

practices you use. Give them a full picture of what you do to 

manage your health. This will help ensure coordinated and safe 

care. For tips about talking with your health care providers about 

complementary and alternative medicine, see NCCAM’s Time to 

Talk campaign at nccam.nih.gov/timetotalk/. 
Sources

Hoodia. Natural Medicines Comprehensive Database Web site. Accessed at www.naturaldatabase.com on July 15, 2009.

Hoodia (Hoodia gordonii). Natural Standard Database Web site. Accessed at www.naturalstandard.com on July 15, 2009.

For More Information

Visit the NCCAM Web site at nccam.nih.gov and view Using Dietary Supplements Wisely

(nccam.nih.gov/health/supplements/wiseuse.htm).

NCCAM Clearinghouse

Toll-free in the U.S.: 1-888-644-6226

TTY (for deaf and hard-of-hearing callers): 1-866-464-3615

E-mail: info@nccam.nih.gov

PubMed® 

Web site: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez

NIH Office of Dietary Supplements

Web site: www.ods.od.nih.gov

This publication is not copyrighted and is in the public domain. Duplication is encouraged.

NCCAM has provided this material for your information. It is not intended to substitute for the 

medical expertise and advice of your primary health care provider. We encourage you to 

discuss any decisions about treatment or care with your health care provider. The mention of 

any product, service, or therapy is not an endorsement by NCCAM.

National Institutes of Health

♦♦♦

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

D387

Created August 2007

Updated April 2012
No. 11-7159.

#### Graves *v.*Industrial Power Generating Corp., dba Ingenco.

C. A. 4th Cir. Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma •pau-peris*[565 U. S. 1109] denied.
No. 11-9789.

#### Blake *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER DENYING PANEL REHEARING 

AND EN BANC RECONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: In the Interest of K.P.M, a child; In the Interest of M.K.F. and S.M.F.,

children; In the Interest of S.L.F., A.D.T. and A.A.T., children;

Appellate case numbers: 01-17-00327-CV; 01-17-00328-CV; 01-17-00329-CV

Trial court case numbers: 2016-16344; 2010-26768; 2015-43569

Trial court: 310th District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: November 27, 2017

Party filing motion: Appellant

It is ordered that the motion for panel rehearing is DENIED GRANTED.

It is ordered that the motion for en banc reconsideration is DENIED GRANTED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Justices Keyes, Brown, and Lloyd

En banc Court consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings, Keyes, Higley,

 Bland, Massengale, Brown, Lloyd, and Caughey

Date: January 9, 2018
#### § 50-201.104 Protection against unintentional employment of underage minors.

An employer shall not be deemed to have knowingly employed an underage minor in the performance of contracts subject to the Act if, during the period of the employment of such minor, the employer has on file an unexpired certificate of age issued and held pursuant to regulations issued by the Secretary of Labor under section 3(1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 CFR 570.121), showing that such minor is at least 16 years of age.

[52 FR 6147, Mar. 2, 1987. Redesignated at 61 FR 40716, Aug. 5, 1996]
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 157 (Tuesday, August 15, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46912-46913]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6917]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Interest Rate on Overdue Debts

    Section 30.13 of the Department of Health and Human Services' 
claims

[[Page 46913]]

collection regulations (45 CFR Part 30) provides that the Secretary 
shall charge an annual rate of interest as fixed by the Secretary of 
the Treasury after taking into consideration private consumer rates of 
interest prevailing on the date that HHS becomes entitled to recovery. 
The rate generally cannot be lower than the Department of the 
Treasury's current value of funds rate or the applicable rate 
determined from the ``Schedule of Certified Interest Rates with Range 
of Maturities.'' This rate may be revised quarterly by the Secretary of 
the Treasury and shall be published quarterly by the Department of 
Health and Human Services in the Federal Register.
    The Secretary of the Treasury has certified a rate of 12\5/8\% for 
the quarter ended June 30, 2006. This interest rate will remain in 
effect until such time as the Secretary of the Treasury notifies HHS of 
any change.

    Dated: August 9, 2006.
Jean Augustine,
Director, Office of Financial Policy and Reporting.
[FR Doc. 06-6917 Filed 8-14-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-04-M
§ 51-9.405 Request of review of refusal to amend a record. ( a ) An individual who disagrees with the refusal to amend may appeal that refusal with the Committee. An individual should address a request for review of a refusal to amend any record, exclusive of a personnel record of a current Committee employee to the Chairperson, Committee for Purchase from People who are Blind or Severely Disabled, Jefferson Plaza 2, Suite 10800, 1421 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, Virginia 22202-3259.
( b ) A request to review must be in writing and should include a copy of the initial request and refusal to amend. The request to review should bear the legend “Privacy Act—Request for Review of Refusal to Amend” on both the face of the letter and the envelope. The Chairperson shall complete the review and make a determination no later than 30 working days after receipt of the request for review, unless a determination is made to extend the 30 day period. If a determination is made to extend the 30 day period, the Chairperson shall notify the requester in writing of the reasons for the delay and the date when the review will be completed.
( c ) Upon receipt of a request to review a refusal to amend, the Chairperson shall undertake an independent review of the request and initial determination. If, after conducting the review, the Chairperson agrees to amend, he shall notify the requester promptly in writing of the determination, amend the record, and notify previous recipients in accordance with § 51-9.403.
( d ) If, after conducting the review, the Chairperson agrees with the refusal to amend the record, he shall notify the requester promptly in writing of the determination. The notification shall include the reasons for the refusal, and shall advise the individual of his right to file a statement of disagreement, and the procedures for doing so. The Chairperson also shall advise the individual that such statement of disagreement will be made available in any subsequent disclosures of the record together with a concise statement summarizing reasons for refusal where the responsible official deems it appropriate. The Chairperson also will advise the individual of his right to bring civil action against the agency in a district court of the United States.
(5 U.S.C. 552a)
[40 FR 51168, Nov. 3, 1975, Redesignated at 56 FR 48983, Sept. 26, 1991, and amended at 59 FR 16777, Apr. 8, 1994; 59 FR 59345, Nov. 16, 1994; 63 FR 16440, Apr. 3, 1998; 65 FR 35287, June 2, 2000]
No. 11-8556.

#### Book *v.*Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis [ante,*p. 917] denied.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4389

To require the Secretary of the Interior to consider, in issuing national

park concessions contracts, the extent to which those contracts involve

Indians and Indian-owned businesses, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 11, 1994

Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota introduced the following bill; which was

referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

A BILL

To require the Secretary of the Interior to consider, in issuing national park concessions contracts, the extent to

which those contracts involve Indians and Indian-owned

businesses, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONSIDERATION OF INDIANS IN PARK CONCES4 SIONS CONTRACTS.

5 The Secretary of the Interior, in developing regula6 tions regarding national park concessions contracts, shall

7 consider, as a factor in the selection of a best offer, the

8 extent to which plans for employment of Indians and in-
2

•HR 4389 IH

1 volvement of businesses owned by Indians or Indian tribes

2 in the operation of concession contracts.

Æ
#### De Maio Will.

*560Argued November 21, 1949.

Before Maxey, C. J., Drew, Linn, Stern, Patterson, Stearns and Jones, JJ.

*564
      *John W. Bohlen,*with him *Philip S. Polis*and *Mc*Bride, *Lipschitz, Woolston, Berger é*Bohlen, for appellants.

*Howard E. Stern,*with him *Milton 0. Sharp*and *Taylor & Stern,*for appellees.

January 5, 1950:

Opinion

per Curiam,

The decree is affirmed on the able opinion of Judge Klein for the learned court below. Costs to be paid by appellant.
No. 11-9325.

#### Chaffo *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### MARCIA B. O'REILLY, Respondent, *v.*THE WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY, NORVIN GREEN and GEORGE L. DOUGLAS, Appellants.

*Code,*§ *390*— examination *of adverse party.*

Where it appears that the plaintiff has a probable cause of action, and that the examination of the adverse party is necessary to enable him to obtain the information requisite to frame his complaint, he is entitled, under section 390 of the Code, to an order requiring the defendant to appear and submit to an examination as a witness.

*Glenny*v. *8tedwe.il*(64 N. Y., 120) followed.

*125Appeal from an order requiring the defendant Norvin Green to appear and submit to an examination as a witness on behalf, and at the instance of the plaintiff.

*George W. Boren,*for the appellants.

*A dolphus D. Pape,*for the respondent.

The affidavit is sufficient. *(Glenny*v. *Steckoell,*64 N. Y., 120 ; S. O., 1 Abb. N. C., 327, with note and case there *cited; Bhepmoes*v. Bousson, 52 IIow., 40] ; *Bailey*v. *Dean,*5 Barb., 297; *McIntyre*v. *Mcmcius,*16 Johns., 592 ; *Me Viekar*v. *Ketchum,*1 Abb. [N. S.], 452.) The facts sought to be discovered are necessary to aid plaintiff in the prosecution of the case and to frame her complaint, and, even if not absolutely necessary, the examination could be maintained. *{Ma/rsh*v. *Davison,*9 Paige, 580; *Vance*v. *Andrews,*2 Barb. Oh., 370; *Bhepmoes*v. *Bousson,*52 How., 405 ; *Mo Vicker*v. *Ketchum,*1 Abb. [N. S.], 452.) It is an absolute right, and either party is entitled, under the Code, to examine his adversary. *(Cook*v. *Bidwell,*29 How., 483; *Green*v. *Wood,*6 Abb. Pr., 277.) And the rule has been so clearly defined that, where a party calls his adversary as a witness and examines him before trial, he is precluded from cross-examining him any further on the trial, unless some reason or excuse is shown. ( *Wilmont*v. *Meserole,*40 N. Y. Superior Ct. [8 J. & S.], 321.)

Daniels, J.:

The order in the case was made under section 390 of the Code of Procedure. The affidavit upon which it was made showed that the plaintiff had a probable cause of action in the case, and that the examination of the appellant was necessary to enable her to obtain the requisite information to frame her complaint; and this, although not within the terms of Rule 21 of this court, was sufficient to entitle her to the order, as the section under which it was made has been finally construed. *(Glenney*v. *Stedwell,*64 N. Y., 120.) This authority is controlling upon the appeal taken and the order should therefore be affirmed with ten dollars costs and the disbursements.

Davis, P. J., concurred.

Present — Davis, P. J., Brady and Daniels, JJ.

Order affirmed, with ten. dollars costs and disbursements.
No. 11-5133.

#### Santivanez *v.*Drew, Warden.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                BD

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               Jan-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    Jul-31-1999
<CASH>                                           16,411,743
<RECEIVABLES>                                       345,935
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                       0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                     0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                               1,504,684
<PP&E>                                              200,966
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   18,581,713
<SHORT-TERM>                                        125,000
<PAYABLES>                                          220,799
<REPOS-SOLD>                                              0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                       0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                  295,500
<LONG-TERM>                                         400,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                            114,763
<OTHER-SE>                                       16,484,481
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     18,581,713
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                   533,644
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                                243,890
<COMMISSIONS>                                     4,179,494
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                             0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   14,249
<COMPENSATION>                                    2,438,863
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1,014,528
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        1,014,528
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                        625,584
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0.068
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.068





</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4641

To restore the previous tariff treatment accorded to hand-cast string-drawn

fishing nets.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 23, 1994

Mr. SUNDQUIST introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To restore the previous tariff treatment accorded to handcast string-drawn fishing nets.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. HAND-CAST STRING-DRAWN FISHING NETS.

4 Chapter 56 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the

5 United States is amended—

6 (1) by striking the subheading 5608.11.10; and

7 (2) by inserting in numerical sequence the fol8 lowing new subheading, with the article description

9 having the same indentation as the article descrip10 tion in subheading 5608.11.00:
2

•HR 4641 IH

1

‘‘ 5608.12.00 Made up hand-cast string-drawn

fishing nets ...................................... 5% 1.7% (IL),

6.8% (CA),

14.1% (MX)

82%

’’.

2 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by section

4 1 applies with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from

5 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after

6 the date of the enactment of this Act.

7 (b) RETROACTIVE PROVISION.—Notwithstanding sec8 tion 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision

9 of law to the contrary, upon a request filed with the appro10 priate customs officer before the 60th day after the date

11 of the enactment of this Act, any entry or withdrawal from

12 warehouse for consumption of goods to which the amend13 ment made by section 1 applies and that was made—

14 (1) after December 31, 1988, and

15 (2) before the 15th day after the date of the

16 enactment of this Act;

17 and with respect to which there would have been a lower

18 duty if the amendment made by section 1 had applied to

19 such entry or withdrawal, shall be liquidated or

20 reliquidated as though such entry or withdrawal had oc21 curred on such 15th day.

Æ
# Dr. Marwan Jamal 

### Interim Department Chair, Professor

### Simulation and Modeling, Artificial Intelligence, Data Analytics

### 

### Areas of Interest:

Wireless and mobile computing, simulation and modeling, artificial Intelligence, data analytics

### Academic Credentials: 

B.S., The George Washington University M.S., The George Washington UniversityPh.D., The George Washington University

### Relevant Professional Experience: 

Dr. Jamal joined the CIC faculty in 2000.  Prior to that, he was a faculty member at George Washington University.  Dr Jamal, fluent in both Arabic and French, has participated widely in international business development for over 25 years.  He is also responsible for the private sector partnership program at CIC.

 

### Scholarship:

Dr. Jamal’s current scholarly interests include telecommunications, wireless and mobile computing, frequency spectrum management, simulation and modeling, virtual reality, and intelligent agents.  He has presented at several leading conferences on telecommunications and wireless technologies.

 

**Courses:**
        - Critical Information Systems Technologies (CST)Global Enterprise Networking and Telecommunications (GEN)
        - Data Management Strategies and Technology (DMS)
        - Emerging Information Systems (EIT)
        - Enterprise Architecture for Leaders (ARC)
        - Data Analytics for Leaders (DAL)
        - Strategic Leadership Theory and Practice (SLP)
        - Data Analytics for Decision Makers (DAV)
        - Modeling for Enterprise Architecture (MEA)
        - Defense Enterprise Architecture (DAC)
        - Capstone Course (CAP)
§ 64.4000 Basis and purpose. ( a ) *Basis.* The rules in this subpart are issued pursuant to the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.
( b ) *Purpose.* The purpose of these rules is to facilitate the timely and accurate establishment, termination, and billing of customer telephone service accounts.