CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

-- Page 1

(Electronic Format)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: Placer County Air Pollution Control District

Rule No(s): 2 34 Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: October 14, 2010

Rule Title(s): A utomotive Refinishing Operations

Date Submitted to ARB: N o vember 8, 2010

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): April 9, 1998

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No ( If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Bruce Springsteen Phone Number: (530) 745

- 2337 E

- mail Address: bsprings@placer.ca.gov

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule

Revision based on California Air Resources Board Suggested Control Measure (Octobe r 2005)

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2

(CO) PM TAC (name):

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, will result in quantif iable changes in emissions. Attach reference(s) for emission

factor(s) and other information. Attach calculation sheet showing how the emission information provided below was determined

.

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A

Em ission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Source Category: 0.0 45 tons /day of ROG in 2018 committed in

Sacramento Regional 8

- hr Ozone Attainment Plan (SIP)

Inventory Year Used to C alculate Changes in Emissions: 2018 Area Affected: Placer County

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible) :

0.8CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

-- Page 2

(Electronic Format)

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control Measure: 2018

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the Control Measure: 0.0 45 tons /day of ROG committed in 2018

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any): 2008

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed): 0.04 tons/day of ROG based on 2008 emission inventory

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluation Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emission forecasting and

planning.

III. SOURCES/ATT AINMENT STATUS

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Sources Affected by this Amendment: 35 permitted, many others

Percen t in Nonattainment Area: 95 %

Number of Large ( > 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: 0 Percent in Nonattainment Area: NA %

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large ( > 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as

necessary) : NA

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? Yes No

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) 301, 305 of the Rule.

Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emission Reductions are: VOC limits for coatings, application methods, work

practices

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): 301, 305 Work Practice Standards in Section(s): 303, 305

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): 5 01, 502, 503, 504, 506 Reporting Requirements in Section(s): 501, 502,

503, 504, 506CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

-- Page 3

(Electronic Format)

5/1/2002 3

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainme nt

Discussion: VOC reductions help reduce ozone, and will help to achieve attainment with ozone standards in the

Sacramento Valley and Mountain Counties