alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 51.611 Interim wholesale rates. ( a ) If a state commission cannot, based on the information available to it, establish a wholesale rate using the methodology prescribed in § 51.609, then the state commission may elect to establish an interim wholesale rate as described in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) The state commission may establish interim wholesale rates that are at least 17 percent, and no more than 25 percent, below the incumbent LEC's existing retail rates, and shall articulate the basis for selecting a particular discount rate. The same discount percentage rate shall be used to establish interim wholesale rates for each telecommunications service.
( c ) A state commission that establishes interim wholesale rates shall, within a reasonable period of time thereafter, establish wholesale rates on the basis of an avoided retail cost study that complies with § 51.609.
17 March 2016

038P16

#### Dr. Catherine B. Newkirk v. CVS-Caremark Corp., et al.

Petitioner’s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Order of COA (COAP15-857)

Denied
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)  OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Carl A. Pelzel, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report of Depomed, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



March 16,
2011

By:

/s/ CARL A. PELZEL Carl A. Pelzel Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

# Date and Time:

Friday, August 18, 2006, 9:30 a.m., Commission Meeting.

# Place:

U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 624 Ninth Street, NW., Rm. 540, Washington, DC 20425.

# Status:

 

## Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda

II. Approval of Minutes of July 28, Meeting

III. Announcements

IV. Staff Director's Report

V. Program Planning
    - Record Items for the Briefing on Benefits of Diversity in Elementary and Secondary Education.
    - Outline and Discovery Plan for FY 2007 Statutory Enforcement Report on Elementary and Secondary School Desegregation.
    - Anti-Semitism Brochure.

VI. Management and Operations
    - Strategic Plan Performance Measures.
    - Memorandum of Understanding With Thurgood Marshall Library.

VII. State Advisory Committee Issues
    - Acting Chair for Maine State Advisory Committee.
    - Re-Charter Package for California State Advisory Committee.
    - Re-Charter Package for Georgia State Advisory Committee.

VIII. Closed Meeting To Discuss Personnel Matters

IX. Future Agenda Items

X. Adjourn

# CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:

Audrey Wright, Office of the Staff Director, (202) 376-7700.

David P. Blackwood,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 06-6891  Filed 8-9-06; 11:36 am]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-M
No. 10-11298.

#### Rosenfeld *v.*Hackett et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99.4

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Shane Smith, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly  report on Form 10-Q of Ecuity,  Inc., for the
quarter ended December 31, 2004;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
and  procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the  filing  date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c)  presented  in this  quarterly  report  our  conclusions  about  the
effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

         a) all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b) any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
other  employees  who  have a  significant  role  in the  registrant's  internal
controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and I have  indicated  in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  February 19, 2005

/s/ Shane Smith
------------------------
Shane Smith
Chief Executive Officer
Order entered October 21, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01067-CR

BRANDON DEMON JORDAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F17-75751-I

ORDER

The State’s second motion for an extension of time to file its brief is GRANTED and the 

Clerk of the Court is hereby ordered to file the State’s brief tendered to the Court.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> US DOLLAR

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         907,981
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               972,670
<PP&E>                                         140,688
<DEPRECIATION>                                (82,150)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,394,298
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          236,127
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,128
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,153,043
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,394,298
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  539,862
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (8,124)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (531,738)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (531,738)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (531,738)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11


</TABLE>
§ 22.509 Procedures for mutually exclusive applications in the Paging and Radiotelephone Service. Mutually exclusive applications in the Paging and Radiotelephone Service, including those that are mutually exclusive with applications in the Rural Radiotelephone Service, are processed in accordance with § 22.131 and with this section. ( a ) Applications in the Paging and Radiotelephone Service may be mutually exclusive with applications in the Rural Radiotelephone Service if they seek authorization to operate facilities on the same channel in the same area, or the technical proposals are otherwise in conflict. See § 22.567.
( b ) A modification application in either service filed on the earliest filing date may cause all later-filed mutually exclusive applications of any type in either service to be “cut off” (excluded from a same-day filing group) and dismissed, pursuant to § 22.131(c)(3)(ii) and § 22.131(c)(4).
[59 FR 59956, Nov. 21, 1994, as amended at 61 FR 54099, Oct. 17, 1996; 64 FR 33784, June 24, 1999]
[Crim. No. 422.

Third Appellate District.

April 9, 1918.]

#### THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. ADOLPH LYONS, Appellant.

Criminal Law—Appeal—Failure to Appear or File Briefs—Submission of Cause on Record.—Where on an appeal from a judgment in a criminal action no briefs are filed or appearance made on behalf of appellant, the attorney-general may move to submit the case for decision on the record.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. Malcolm C. Glenn, Judge.

*745The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Martin I. Welsh, and Ralph H. Lewis, for Appellant.

U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, and J. Charles Jones, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.

THE COURT.

Defendant appealed to this court from the judgment of the superior court of the county of Sacramento, under which he was sentenced to serve a term in state’s prison, having previously been convicted by a jury of the crime of grand larceny.

The clerk’s transcript and the reporter’s transcript were filed in this court on the thirteenth day of November, 1917. No briefs have been filed and the time for the filing thereof has not been extended. The case was placed upon the April calendar of this court, at which time there was no appearance on behalf of appellant, and the attorney-general moved that it be submitted on the record. On the authority of *People*v. *Wagner, ante,*p, 41, [171 Pac. 699], and the cases therein cited, the judgment is affirmed.
yearID sourceTypeID sourceTypePopulation

2009 11 4610

2009 21 61284

2009 31 44428

2009 32 14843

2009 41 67

2009 42 38

2009 43 457

2009 51 43

2009 52 2786

2009 53 346

2009 54 641

2009 61 603

2009 62 705
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

Certifications 

 

I, Curtis J. Parker, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Cotelligent, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of Cotelligent, Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures presented in the annual report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting. 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether of not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

Date: April 29, 2004
Flight Operations Safety Checklist 

SAFETY OFFICER CHECKLIST

 SAFETY CLOTHING (VEST) AND HARD HAT

 CORDEN OFF AREA WITH SIGNAGE 

 SET UP SIGNS AND DISPLAY TRIPODS

 CHECK FOR PERSONNEL AND OBSTRUCTIONS IN AREA

 ALERT PERSONNEL THEY MUST LEAVE THE AREA

 LOCATE AND FLAG OBSTRUCTIONS

 CHECK FIRE EXTINGUISHER AND MEDICAL KIT

 SET UP WORKING TABLE AND LANDING PAD

 CHECK COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS

 SET UP BATTERY CHARGERS

 COPTER BATTERY CHARGER 

 VIDEO RECIEVER BATTERY CHARGER

 RC TRANSMITTER BATTERY CHARGER

 CAMERA BATTERY CHARGER

 WALKIE-TALKIE BATTERY CHARGER

 CHECK BATTERIES FOR FULL CHARGE 

 START-UP AND LIFT OFF CHECKLIST 

 CHECK INSPECTION AREA FOR PERSONNEL OR WILDLIFE 

 SAFETY OFFICER/VLOS SPOTTER READY CALL CONFIRMATION 
PILOT/OPERATOR SAFETY CHECKLIST

 SAFETY CLOTHING (VEST) AND HARD HAT 

 COPTER CHECKLIST 

 CHECK FOR ANY DAMAGE OR LOOSE WIRES

 CHECK PROPS FOR DAMAGE AND REPAIR/REPLACE AS NEEDED 

 RAISE ALL ATTENNAS 

 CHECK CAMERA GIMBAL MOVEMENT 

 POWER UP CAMERA & CHECK SETTINGS 

 ATTACH LIPO BATTERY 

 CHECK BALANCE WITH BATTERY ATTACHED 

 ATTACH COPTER BATTERY LEADS 

 RADIO AND VIDEO CHECKLIST 

 POWER UP GROUND CONTROL STATION 

 POWER UP RADIO AND FVP MONITOR 

 CHECK VISUAL ON BOTH CAMERAS 

 CHECK PROGRAMMING SCREEN DETAILS 

 START-UP AND LIFT OFF CHECKLIST 

 CHECK INSPECTION AREA FOR PERSONNEL OR WILDLIFE 

 SAFETY OFFICER/SPOTTER READY CALL 

 START-UP PROPS LIFT-OFF AND HOVER 

 CHECK CONTROLS 

 GPS MODE CHECK 

 ALTITUDE UP/DOWN CHECK

 TURN RIGHT/LEFT CHECK

 SLIDE LEFT/RIGHT CHECK 

 FORWARD/REVERSE CHECK 

 CAMERA OPERATION CHECK 

 LIGHTS ON/OFF CHECK 

 BEGIN INSPECTION/MAPPING/MONITORING
5 November 2015

187P15

#### State v. Aleksandr Sergeyevich Kiselev

1. State’s Motion for Temporary Stay

1. Allowed 06/08/2015

Dissolved 11/05/2015

2. State’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

2. Denied

3. State’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA14-1020)

3. Denied
§ 54.11 Requirement to remove and replace. ( a ) Each Eligible Telecommunications Carrier receiving Universal Service Fund support must certify prior to receiving a funding commitment or support that it does not use covered communications equipment or services.
( b ) For the purposes of this section, covered communications equipment or services means any communications equipment or service that is on the Covered List maintained pursuant to § 1.50002 of this chapter, and: ( 1 ) As defined in the Report and Order of the Commission in the matter of Protecting Against National Security Threats to the Communications Supply Chain Through FCC Programs (FCC 19-121; WC Docket No. 18-89; adopted November 22, 2019 (in this section referred to as the 'Report and Order'); or
( 2 ) as determined to be covered by both the process of the Report and Order and the Designation Orders of the Commission on June 30, 2020 (DA 20-690; PS Docket No. 19-351; adopted June 30, 2020) (DA 20-691; PS Docket No. 19-352; adopted June 30, 2020) (in this section collectively referred to as the 'Designation Orders').
( c ) The certification referenced in paragraph (a) of this section is required starting one year after the date the Commission releases a Public Notice announcing that applications are accepted for filing in the corresponding filing window of the Reimbursement Program per § 1.50004(b) for the removal, replacement, and disposal of associated covered communications equipment and services.
( d ) Reimbursement Program recipients, as defined in § 1.50001(h) of this chapter, are not subject to paragraph (a) of this section until after the expiration of their corresponding removal, replacement, and disposal term per § 1.50004(h) of this chapter for associated covered communications equipment and services.
[86 FR 2946, Jan. 13, 2021, as amended at 86 FR 47022, Aug. 23, 2021]
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.321 Use of depositions in hearing proceedings. ( a ) No inference concerning the admissibility of a deposition in evidence shall be drawn because of favorable action on the notice to take depositions.
( b ) Except as provided in this paragraph and in § 1.319, objection may be made to receiving in evidence any deposition or part thereof for any reason which would require the exclusion of the evidence if the witness were then present and testifying. ( 1 ) Objections to the competency of a witness, or the competency, relevancy or materiality of testimony are waived by failure to make them before or during the taking of depositions if (and only if) the ground of the objection is one which might have been obviated or removed if presented at that time.
( 2 ) Objection on the ground of privilege is waived by failure to make it before or during the taking of depositions.
( c ) A party shall not be deemed to make a person his own witness for any purpose by taking his deposition. The introduction in evidence of the deposition or any part thereof for any purpose other than that of contradicting or impeaching the deponent makes the deponent the witness of the party introducing the deposition, but this shall not apply to the use by an adverse party of a deposition as described in paragraph (d)(2) of this section. At the hearing any party may rebut any relevant evidence contained in a deposition whether introduced by him or by any other party.
( d ) At the hearing (or in a pleading), any part or all of a deposition, so far as admissible, may be used against any party who was present or represented at the taking of the deposition or who had due notice thereof, in accordance with any one of the following provisions: ( 1 ) Any deposition may be used by any party for the purpose of contradicting or impeaching the testimony of deponent as a witness.
( 2 ) The deposition of a party or of any one who at the time of taking the deposition was an officer, director, or managing agent of a public or private corporation, partnership or association which is a party may be used by an adverse party for any purpose.
( 3 ) The deposition of any witness, whether or not a party, may be used by any party for any lawful purpose.
( 4 ) If only part of a deposition is offered in evidence by a party, an adverse party may require him to introduce all of it which is relevant to the part introduced, and any party may introduce any other parts.
( 5 ) Substitution of parties does not affect the right to use depositions previously taken; and, when an action in any hearing has been dismissed and another action involving the same subject matter is afterward brought between the same parties or their representatives or successors in interest, all depositions lawfully taken and duly filed in the former action may be used in the latter as if originally taken therefor.
[33 FR 463, Jan. 12, 1968, as amended at 41 FR 14874, Apr. 8, 1976; 85 FR 63181, Oct. 6, 2020]