alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Mr. Stuart K. Archer 

### Dean of Administration

### 

### 

Mr. Stuart K. Archer is Dean of Administration at the National Defense University College of Information and Cyberspace. Mr. Archer is an Air Force Veteran, retired Colonel, Command Pilot, and a former Senior Defense Consultant with a firm supporting international defense transformation.  He previously served as a senior civilian official at the Director level on the Headquarters Department of the Army Staff responsible for U.S. Army Executive Travel Program which included aviation operations, travel policy, and management of the Department of Defense Passport and Visa program.

As an Air Force officer, he served in a diverse variety of roles over the course of a 28-year career. As an aviator he accumulated over 4,000 flight hours including 400 combat hours in the B-52 and KC-10 aircraft. He further served as a Support Squadron Commander, Air Expeditionary Squadron Commander, and Mobility Wing Vice Commander during the height of U.S. operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. As a staff officer, he served on the Joint Operations Staff of U.S. Central Command, on the personal staff of two Secretaries of Defense, as a senior military advisor at the Department of State, and finally on the immediate staff of the Chief of Staff of the Air Force.

He is currently the President of the Royal Air Force Museum American Foundation and has served on volunteer boards of AFCEA, as a member of the Atlantic Council, and with other aerospace and defense advocacy groups. He was selected a Fellow of the Royal Aeronautical Society in 2021.

Mr. Archer holds a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration from the Citadel, an MBA from Louisiana Technical University, a Master of Military Arts and Science from the Army Command and General Staff College, and a Master of Strategic Studies degree from the Air War College. He has also participated in the Senior Executive Fellows Program and the National and International Defense Fellows Program both at the Harvard Kennedy School.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 16 (Tuesday, January 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 3980]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1669]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[00-007]


Notice of agency report forms under OMB review

AGENCY:  National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
SUMMARY:  The National Aeronautics and Space Administration, as part of 
its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, 
invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this 
opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information 
collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. 
L. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). Information collection is required 
to ensure proper use of and disposition of rights to inventions made in 
the course of, and data developed under NASA contracts.

DATES:  All comments should be submitted on or before March 27, 2000.

ADDRESSES:  All comments should be addressed to Mr. Phillip Smith Code 
BFZ, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 
20546-0001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Ms. Carmela Simonson, NASA Reports 
Officer, (202) 358-1223.
    Title: NASA Contractor Financial Management Reports
    OMB Number: 2700-0003
    Type of review: Extension
    Need and Uses: The NASA Contractor Financial Management Reporting 
System is the basic financial medium for contractor reporting of 
estimated and incurred costs, providing essential data for projecting 
costs and hours to ensure that contractor performance is realistically 
planned and supported by dollar and labor resources. The data provided 
by these reports is an integral part of the Agency's accrual accounting 
and cost-based budgeting systems required under 31 U.S.C. 3512.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit, not-for-profit 
institutions.
    Number of Respondents: 850.
    Responses Per Respondent: 12.
    Annual Responses: 10,200.
    Hours Per Request: 9 hrs.
    Annual Burden Hours: 91,500.
    Frequency of Report: quarterly/monthly.

David B. Nelson,
Deputy Chief Information Officer, Office of the Administrator.
[FR Doc. 00-1669 Filed 1-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-U
No. 11-9116.

#### Vines *v.*Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16D0438. SHARON BUSH ELLISON v. ALAN DUNBAR A/K/A ALAN

JACKSON.

Sharon Bush Ellison sought to file a complaint in forma pauperis. The trial

court denied her request, and Ellison filed this application for discretionary appeal.

Ellison, however, is entitled to appeal the ruling directly. 

Under OCGA § 9-15-2 (d), when a party presents a civil action for filing in

forma pauperis, the trial court is required to review the pleading. If the “pleading

shows on its face such a complete absence of any justiciable issue of law or fact that

it cannot be reasonably believed that the court could grant any relief against any party

named in the pleading, then the judge shall enter an order denying filing of the

pleading.” OCGA § 9-15-2 (d). An order denying a pleading under this statute may

be appealed directly. See id.

We will grant an otherwise timely application for discretionary appeal if the

lower court’s order is subject to direct appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). Accordingly,

this application is hereby GRANTED, and Ellison shall have ten days from the date

of this order to file a notice of appeal with the trial court. If she has already filed a

notice of appeal in the trial court, she need not file a second notice. The clerk of the

trial court is DIRECTED to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to

the Court of Appeals

July 13, 2016
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

07/13/2016
#### Kerwin S. HARMON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant—Appellee, v. Internal Revenue Service, Third Party Defendant—Appellee.

No. 04-1107.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 11, 2004.

Decided March 18, 2004.

*29Kerwin S. Harmon, Appellant pro se. Gerard J. Stief, Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, Washington, D.C.; Paula Keyser Speck, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Kerwin S. Harmon appeals the district court’s order dismissing his suit against his employer, the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, for recovery of wages withheld in accordance with a tax lien. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Harmon v. WMATA,*No. CA-03-28-DKC (D. Md. filed Nov. 26, 2003 & entered Dec. 1, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
Grafton

No. 81-474

#### Orford Teachers Association *& a.*v. Hugh Watson, Superintendent of Schools *& a.*

September 8, 1982

*Anne S. Richmond,*of Concord, by brief and orally, for the plaintiffs.

*Nighswander, Martin, Lord, KillKelley & Kidder P.A.,*of Laconia *(Bradley F. Kidder*on the brief and orally), for the defendants.

Memorandum Opinion

The only question before us is whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying the plaintiffs’ motion for attorney’s fees under RSA 91-A:8 (Supp. 1981).

Subsequent to our decision in *Orford Teachers*Assoc. *v. Watson, 121*N.H. 118, 427 A.2d 21 (1981), the plaintiff teachers association filed in superior court a “Motion to Grant Access to Minutes and Award Attorney’s Fees.” The trial court, on May 1, 1981, entered the following order: “Atty. Kidder having no objection, request to allow inspection of executive session minutes ... is granted.”

A hearing on that part of the motion regarding the award of attorney’s fees was held on November 19, 1981. The Superior Court *{Johnson,*J.) recognized that this aspect of the case was governed by RSA 91-A:8 (Supp. 1981) which provides that one refusing access to public records may be liable for reasonable attorney’s fees and costs *“at the discretion of the court.”*(Emphasis added.) The court found that “given all the facts and circumstances of this case, that the award of attorney’s fees is not justified and hence, the plaintiff’s petition is denied. Exceptions noted.”

*804 On this appeal, the parties have failed to provide us with a transcript of the motion hearing and our review is therefore limited to determining whether there are errors of law apparent on the face of the record. *Baker v. Dennis Brown Realty,*121 N.H. 640, 644, 433 A.2d 1271, 1273 (1981). Because no abuse of discretion on the part of the court appears on the record before us, our order is

*Appeal dismissed; affirmed.*

Douglas, J., dissented.

Douglas, J.,

dissenting: I don’t believe that a trial judge should conclude that the plaintiffs’ pursuit of a litigated case from the trial court to this court to effectuate the laudable purpose of access to public documents is worth *no*legal fees at all. I don’t need a record of a motion hearing to find a clear error when no fees at all are awarded to a successful plaintiff. Such a result speaks for itself. I would require a clear and explicit statement of why fees are not being awarded in an RSA ch. 91-A case. *See Moskowitz v. Moskowitz,*118 N.H. 199, 385 A.2d 120 (1978). To do otherwise turns the right-to-know law and N.H. Constitution part I, article 8 into dead letters.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4313 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4313

To prohibit the admission to the United States as refugees individuals 
    who served in the armed forces of Iraq during the Persian Gulf 
conflict, and to deport any such individuals who have been so admitted.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 1994

Mr. Kanjorski introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the admission to the United States as refugees individuals 
    who served in the armed forces of Iraq during the Persian Gulf 
conflict, and to deport any such individuals who have been so admitted.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF IRAQI SOLDIERS AS REFUGEES.

    (a) Prohibition on Admission.--Notwithstanding any other provision 
of law, an individual who served in the armed forces of Iraq during the 
Persian Gulf conflict may not be admitted to the United States as a 
refugee under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
    (b) Effective Date and Application.--
            (1) Subsection (a) shall be deemed to have taken effect on 
        August 2, 1990.
            (2) An individual who has been admitted to the United 
        States as a refugee, but would be ineligible for admission 
        under subsection (a), shall have such refugee status revoked 
        and shall be deported.
    (c) Persian Gulf Conflict Defined.--For purposes of this section, 
the term ``Persian Gulf conflict'' means the period beginning on August 
2, 1990 and ending on February 27, 1991.

                                 <all>
```
§ 22.227 Petitions to deny and limitations on settlements. ( a ) Procedures regarding petitions to deny long-form applications in the paging service will be governed by § 1.939 of this chapter.
( b ) The consideration that an individual or an entity will be permitted to receive for agreeing to withdraw an application or petition to deny will be limited by the provisions set forth in § 1.935 of this chapter.
[67 FR 45367, July 9, 2002]
EXHIBIT 12.2



Valuation and Qualifying Accounts



|Valuation and Qualifying Accounts |  | OpeningBalance |  | Charged toExpense |  | ChargedagainstIncome |  | ClosingBalance
|--------------------------------- |  | -------------- |  | ----------------- |  | -------------------- |  | --------------
|Deferred tax valuation allowance  |  |                |  |                   |  |                      |  |               
|December 31, 2002                 |  | 43,070         |  | 12,258            |  | 30,290               |  | 25,038        
|December 31, 2001                 |  | 54,468         |  |                  |  | 11,398               |  | 43,070        
|December 31, 2000                 |  | 93,134         |  |                  |  | 38,666               |  | 54,468
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR VANADIUM INTERNATIONAL INC. A DEVELOPMENT
STAGE COMPANY, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             328
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   328
<PP&E>                                         104,775
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 105,103
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           62,593
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,610
<OTHER-SE>                                     125,890
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   105,103
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,670
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,670)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,670)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,670)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>



                                                                      EXHIBIT 24

                                 AAF-McQuay Inc.
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that each of the undersigned Directors of 
AAF-McQuay Inc. hereby constitutes and appoints Joseph B. Hunter and Michael 
J. Christopher and either of them, the true and lawful agents and 
attorneys-in-fact of the undersigned with full power and authority in any of 
said agents and attorneys-in-fact, to sign for the undersigned in their 
respective names as Directors of AAF-McQuay Inc., the Annual Report on Form 
10-K, and any and all further amendments to said Report, hereby ratifying and 
confirming all acts taken by any such agent and attorney-in-fact, as herein 
authorized.

Dated:
<TABLE>
<S>                                         <C>
/s/ Joseph B. Hunter              .         /s/ Gerald L. Boehrs           .
-----------------------------------         --------------------------------
Joseph B. Hunter                            Gerald L. Boehrs



/s/ Michael J. Christopher     .            /s/ Liu Wan Min                .
--------------------------------            --------------------------------
Michael J. Christopher                      Liu Wan Min



/s/ Quek Leng Chan              .           /s/ Ho Nyuk Choy              .
---------------------------------           -------------------------------
Quek Leng Chan                              Ho Nyuk Choy



/s/ Roger Tan Kim Hock      .
-----------------------------
Roger Tan Kim Hock

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7281

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ROBERT W. LEGARE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CR-93-212-A, CA-97-567-AM)

Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 31, 1997

Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Fred Warren Bennett, CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL, Washington,

D.C., for Appellant. Leslie Bonner McClendon, OFFICE OF THE UNITED

STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. United States v. Legare, Nos. CR-93-212-A;

CA-97-567-AM (E.D. Va. June 4 & 16, 1997). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL



## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D2023-0784 Lower Tribunal No. 17-CF-000233-XX

_____________________________

M ARQUAN L AWSON , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________ Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County.

Sharon M. Franklin, Judge.

July 16, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

STARGEL, WOZNIAK and SMITH, JJ., concur.

Marquan Lawson, Crestview, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cerese Crawford Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          44,128
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,982
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                63,494
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  63,494
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          968,245
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,453,798
<OTHER-SE>                                     480,460
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    63,494
<SALES>                                      4,063,468
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                        2,612,216
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,225,370
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              82,845
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (775,118)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,490
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (759,049)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4563

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade for the vessel ORCA.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 9, 1994

Mrs. VUCANOVICH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

ORCA.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

4 Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the Act of June 19, 1886

5 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106 of title 46,

6 United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may

7 issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate en-
2

•HR 4563 IH

1 dorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the

2 vessel ORCA (United States official number 504279).

Æ
§ 64.636 Prohibition of default provider freezes. ( a ) A default provider freeze prevents a change in an iTRS user's default provider selection unless the iTRS user gives the provider from whom the freeze was requested his or her express consent.
( b ) Default provider freezes shall be prohibited.
[78 FR 40609, July 5, 2013]