alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Visium Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2019 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Mark B. Lucky, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.
The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.



May
15, 2019



|By: | /s/
    Mark B. Lucky                | 
|--- | ------------------------------------ | 
|    | Mark
    B. Lucky                    | 
|    | CEO,
    principal executive officer | 



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            College of Information and Cyberspace
                    National Defense University
                CIC
        Search
                    Search CIC:
                        Search
                Search CIC:
                    Search
    Home

    About 
        Mission & Vision

    Faculty & Staff

    Fact Sheet

    Alumni

    Internships

    FAQ

    Admissions 
        Eligibility Requirements

    Admissions Calendar

    Application Instructions

    Apply Online

    International Students

    Academics 
        Graduate Catalog

    M.S. in Strategic Information and Cyberspace Studies
        
        JPME Master's Degree

    Cyber Workforce Master's Degree (Part Time)

    Leadership Development Programs

    Graduate Certificates

    Academic Partners

    Current Students 
        JPME II  Incoming Students

    LDP Incoming Students

    Student Registration

    Bring Your Own Device

    IA Compliance

    Completion Procedures / Order Transcripts

    Student Services and Resources

    Events
    
        Cyber Beacon

    Cyber PME Colloquium

    Hopper Award

    Lecture Series

    CYBERCOM Symposium

    NEWS

    UC2
    
        About

    Events

    Work With Us

    Center for Cybersecurity
    
        About

    Cybersecurity Center POC

    Cybersecurity Supporting Faculty

    CAE-CDE CISO Certificate Program

    Cybersecurity Trending News

    Cyber Labs
        
        Ethical Hacking

    Critical Infrastructure - SCADA

    Cyber Exercises
        
        Tabletop Exercise

    Cyber Competitions

    Cyber Resources and Awareness

    Stakeholder / Industry Advisory Council

    Contact 
        Contact Us

    Directions

    Access to Ft. McNair

    Map of Ft. McNair  Home
  NEWS
  News & Announcements
 News & Announcements Download
 Details
 Share
 News
 The Chancellor's Speaker Series 2021 By Jonathan Rauch
                Chancellor Speaker Series
 
 SHARE
 PRINT
 National Defense University


College of Information and Cyberspace

300 Fifth Ave., Bldg. 62
Fort Lesley J. McNair
Washington, DC 20319-5066

202-685-6300
                    Stay Connected
                
                
                DOD Privacy & Security
 DOD Links Disclaimer
 DOD Social Media Policy
 DOD Web Policy
 FOIA
 NDU System of Records Notice
 NDU Privacy & Security Notice
 No FEAR Act
 Open GOV
 Plain Writing Act
 Section 508
 Small Business Act
 USA.gov
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority (the Authority), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge,
on the date hereof:



|(a) | this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Authority for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Authority.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/    LEO M.
CHUPASKALeo M. ChupaskaChief Financial Officer, Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityDecember 28, 2009


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Authority and will be retained by the Authority and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 21 - 0332
IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF JENNIFER S. CONROY, Petitioner a n d Appellant , v. MICHAEL SCOTT CONROY, Respondent And Appellee . . **ORDER**
Upon unopposed motion of Appellant, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT DeAnn Cooney is appointed as m ediator in this case pursuant to M.R.App.P. 7(5).

DATED this

____ day of Septe mber , 20 21

By

______________________________ S UPREME C OURT J USTICE
Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 3 2021

09/03/2021 Case Number: DA 21-0332
No. 11-9690.

#### Smartt *v.*Department of Education, Default Resolution Group.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT
32.2



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Visium Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2019 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Mark Lucky, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.
The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.



May
15, 2019



|By: | /s/
    Mark Lucky                                                                          | 
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|    | Mark
    Lucky                                                                              | 
|    | Chief
        Financial Officer, principal financial and
        accounting
        officer | 



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 11-5520.

#### Ramirez *v.*United States et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### §§ 27.310-27.320 [Reserved]
#### § 27.1205 EBS renewal standard.

In applying the renewal standard contained in § 1.949 of this chapter to EBS, for licenses initially issued after October 25, 2019, the applicable safe harbors are the buildout standards contained in § 27.14(u). For licenses initially issued before October 25, 2019, the applicable safe harbors are the buildout standards contained in § 27.14(o); provided, however, that the educational use safe harbor contained in § 27.14(o)(2) may only be used by a licensee that meets the eligibility requirements to hold an EBS license pursuant to the provisions of § 27.1201(a) contained in the edition of 47 CFR parts 20 through 39, revised as of October 1, 2017.

[84 FR 57365, Oct. 25, 2019]
#### § 30.207 Radio frequency (RF) safety.

Licensees and manufacturers are subject to the radio frequency radiation exposure requirements specified in §§ 1.1307(b), 1.1310, 2.1091, and 2.1093 of this chapter, as appropriate. Applications for equipment authorization of mobile or portable devices operating under this section must contain a statement confirming compliance with these requirements. Technical information showing the basis for this statement must be submitted to the Commission upon request.
#### STATE *v.*EMERSON AUSTIN.

*To “ become*” *intoxicated not a crime under R. L. s.*3812.

The complaint alleged that the respondent “became and was intoxicated by the use of intoxicating liquor.” *Held,*on demurrer, that no crime was charged; that B. L. s. 3812 made it an offence to *be found,,*but not to *be*intoxicated.

This was the complaint of a town grand *juror,*which came by appeal into the County Court, and was there heard on demurrer at the April Term, 1889, Powers, J., presiding. The demurrer was overruled and the respondent excepted. The point raised and decided appears in the opinion.

*Bullard db*Parker, for the respondent.

The word “'found” in the statute is material and constitutes the gist of the offense, which is something more than merely being intoxicated. Acts 1888, No. 36, s. 1; *State*v. *Deavitt,*47 Yt. 228 ; Bennett’s Yt. Justice, 535 ; *State■*v. Bromley, 25 Conn. 6; Bish. Stat. Or. s. 980.

The complaint should charge the very language of the statute. *State*v. *Janes,*33 Yt. 443,- *State*v. *Cook,*38 Yt. *437; State*v. *Dailey,*41 Yt. 564 ; *State*v. *Deavitt,*47 Yt. 289 ; 2 Hawk. P. C. c. 25, s. 110 and note 2, and s. Ill and note 3.

*D. J. Foster,*State’s Attorney, for the State.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Tart, J.

The complaint against the respondent is that he “ became and was intoxicated by the use of intoxicating liquor,” etc. The point made under a demurrer to the complaint is that he is not charged with having been “found ” intoxicated. Was the latter allegation necessary ? The first act of our modern legislation on the subject of intoxication was s. 2, act No. 2, Session Laws of • 1855, which imposed a penalty upon one, in the words of the statute, who “ becomes ” intoxicated. In the Gen*292eral Statutes which took effect August, 1868, the wording of the act was changed, imposing a penalty, upon one who is “found” intoxicated. G. S. c. 91, s. 10. This wording has remained in the statute until the present time. JEt. L. s. 3812. What was the object of changing the phraseology of the statute unless it was to change the nature of the offense ? Making that intoxication only a crime, which is seen or witnessed by another. In Bennett’s Vt. Justice, 535, it is stated that it is a crime *to be found*intoxicated,italicising the words “ to be found,” thus indicating the views of that eminent jurist, the compiler of the General Statutes. The construction contended for by the respondent has been given a similar statute in Connecticut, *State*v. Bromley, 25 Conn. 6. To become intoxicated is not a crime, *to be found*so, is one.

*Judgment reversed, demurrer sustained, complaint adjudged insufficient and quashed, respondent discharged.*

At the same term, *State v.*Hawley, involving the same question, was heard and like disposition made of it.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Notice of Emergency Amendment to Federal Circuit Rule 15(F) - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"WFDxXraESl\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/notice-of-emergency-amendment-to-federal-circuit-rule-15f\/\">Notice of Emergency Amendment to Federal Circuit Rule 15(F)<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/notice-of-emergency-amendment-to-federal-circuit-rule-15f\/embed\/#?secret=WFDxXraESl\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Notice of Emergency Amendment to Federal Circuit Rule 15(F)” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"WFDxXraESl\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 2071(e) and Federal Circuit Rule 47(b), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has issued an emergency amendment to Federal Circuit Rule 15(f). The amended rule goes into effect immediately on an interim basis and will become final on January 31, 2021, absent additional action by the court.\u00a0 […]"}
Order entered February 8, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 11
- 00820
- CR No. 05
- 11
- 00821
- CR
SAMUEL MONCADA , Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1 Dallas County , Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F09
- 72070
- H & F09
- 72067
- H 

### O RDER
The Court REINSTATES these appeal s . These appeals were submitted to the Court for consideration on December 11, 2012, and we determined the issues raised by Samuel Moncada were inadequately b riefed. Accordingly,

o n December 11, 2012, we ordered the trial court to conduct a hear ing and determine whether Moncada was indigent. If the trial court determined Moncada was indigent, we ordered the trial court to take such measures as necessary to as sure effective representation , which could include appointment of new counsel . If the trial court determined Moncada was not indigent, we ordered the trial court to determine whether Moncada wished to proceed with his current counsel or retain new counsel to represent him in these appeal s . We ADOPT the trial court’s findings thatMoncada is not indigent , desires to prosecute these appeals, and wishes to proceed with his current appellate counsel, Rosalind Kelly.

We STRIKE the appellant brief filed by Monc ada on May 31, 2012. We ORDER Moncada to file a new brief within THIRTY (30) DAYS of the date of this order. Any brief filed by the State must be filed within THIRTY (30) DAYS of the date on which Moncada’s brief is filed. No extensions will be granted to either party.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the Honorable Robert Burns, Presiding Judge, Criminal District Court No. 1; Rosalind Kelly, counsel for Moncada; and the Dallas County District Attorney’s Off ice.

/s/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE PRESIDING JUSTICE
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Guide to federal benefits forindividuals receiving compensation from the Office of Workers� CompensationPrograms [electronic resource].**
 
SuDoc Number:PM 1.8/13:

Item Number:0296-C (online) | 0296-C-03(online)
CGP systemNumber:000778142
 
2009
2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015
 
April 29, 2020
#### Armour Fertilizer Works, *Appellant,*vs. J. H. Gregory and M. M. Gregory, his wife, *Appellees.*

142 So. 824.

Division B.

Decision filed July 6, 1932.

*Maguire <t& VoorMs,*for Appellant;

*Massey, Warloiv, Carpenter <& Fislvbaclc*and *F. W. <& B. C. Davis,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to' be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Circuit Mediation Office Statistics 

2022 Calendar Year

(January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022)

Appeals settled: 4

• Patent: 4

• Non-patent: 0

Appeals not settled; mediation terminated: 1

• Patent: 1

• Non-patent: 0

Success rate - overall (of appeals selected for mediation): 80%

• Patent: 80%

• Non-patent: N/A%
§ 64.2201 Ringing indication requirements. ( a ) A long-distance voice service provider shall not convey a ringing indication to the calling party until the terminating provider has signaled that the called party is being alerted to an incoming call, such as by ringing. ( 1 ) If the terminating provider signals that the called party is being alerted and provides an audio tone or announcement, originating providers must cease any locally generated audible tone or announcement and convey the terminating provider's tone or announcement to the calling party.
( 2 ) The requirements in this paragraph apply to all voice call signaling and transmission technologies and to all long-distance voice service providers, including local exchange carriers as defined in § 64.4001(e), interexchange carriers as defined in § 64.4001(d), providers of commercial mobile radio service as defined in § 20.3 of this chapter, providers of interconnected voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) service as defined in 47 U.S.C. 153(25), and providers of non-interconnected VoIP service as defined in 47 U.S.C. 153(36) to the extent such providers offer the capability to place calls to or receive calls from the public switched telephone network.
( b ) Intermediate providers must return unaltered to providers in the call path any signaling information that indicates that the terminating provider is alerting the called party, such as by ringing. ( 1 ) An intermediate provider may not generate signaling information that indicates the terminating provider is alerting the called party. An intermediate provider must pass the signaling information indicating that the called party is being alerted unaltered to subsequent providers in the call path.
( 2 ) Intermediate providers must also return unaltered any audio tone or announcement provided by the terminating provider.
( 3 ) In this section, the term “intermediate provider” has the same meaning as in § 64.1600(f).
( 4 ) The requirements in this section apply to all voice call signaling and transmission technologies.
( c ) The requirements in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section apply to both interstate and intrastate calls, as well as to both originating and terminating international calls while they are within the United States.
No. 11-5465.

#### Diaz *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certio-rari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 159 (Thursday, August 17, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 47503]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6966]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Notice of Establishment

    Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 
U.S.C. Appendix 2), the Director, National Institutes of Health (NIH), 
announces the establishment of the NIH Office of Portfolio Analysis and 
Strategic Initiatives (OPASI) Council of Councils (Council).
    The Council will consult with, and provide advice and 
recommendations to the Director NIH, the Director, OPASI, and the 
individual Institute and Center (IC) Directors on potential trans-NIH 
initiatives at the conceptual stage. The Council's advice and 
recommendations will assist the IC Directors in identifying trans-NIH 
initiatives to be pursued for further development.
    Duration of this committee is two years from the date the Charter 
is filed.

    Dated: August 8, 2006.
Elias Zerhouni,
Director, National Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. 06-6966 Filed 8-16-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### § 63.66 Closure of or reduction of hours of service at telephone exchanges at military establishments.

Where a carrier desires to close or reduce hours of service at a telephone exchange located at a military establishment because of the deactivation of such establishment, it may, in lieu of filing formal application, file in quintuplicate an informal request. Such request shall make reference to this section and shall set forth the class of office, address, date of proposed closure or reduction, description of service to remain or be substituted, statement as to any difference in charges to the public, and the reasons for the proposed closure or reduction. Authority for such closure or reduction shall be deemed to have been granted by the Commission, effective as of the 15th day following the date of filing of such request, unless, on or before the 15th day, the Commission shall notify the carrier to the contrary.

[45 FR 6585, Jan. 29, 1980]
No. 11-9867.

#### Contreras *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0466

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

RYAN HUNTER ZITNIK,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including October 28, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 20 2022

09/20/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0466
No. 10-10872.

#### Murphy *v.*Maine (two judgments).

Sup. Jud. Ct. Me. Certiorari denied.