U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                  FORM 10-KSB
                [X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                    FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2003
                                       or
                [ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                          Concierge Technologies, Inc.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


  California                       333-38838                       95-4442384
  (state of                  (Commission File Number)             (IRS Employer
incorporation)                                                     I.D. Number)

                          22048 Sherman Way, Suite 301
                              Canoga Park, CA 91303
                                 (818) 610-0310
            -------------------------------------------------------
            (Address and telephone number of registrant's principal
               executive offices and principal place of business)


              -----------------------------------------------------
             (Former name or address, if changed since last report)

         Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

                           Title of each class: None.

                Name of each exchange on which registered: None.

         Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

                         Common Stock, $0.001 par value
                         ------------------------------
                                (Title of class)

     Check  whether  the  issuer  (1)  filed all reports required to be filed by
Section  13  or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such
shorter  period  that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has  been subject to  such filing  requirements for  the past 90 days.   Yes [ ]
No  [ ]


<PAGE>

     Check  if  there  is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item
405  of  Regulation S-B is not contained in this form, and no disclosure will be
contained,  to  the  best  of  registrant's  knowledge,  in  definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB
or   any   amendment  to   this  Form   10-KSB.

State  issuer's  revenues  for  its  most  recent  fiscal  year:  None.

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held
by  non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity
was  sold,  or  the  average  bid and asked price of such common equity, as of a
specified  date  within the past 60 days:  $756,850 computed by reference to the
$0.014  average  of  the  bid  and  asked price of the Company's Common Stock on
September  16,  2003.

     State  the  number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of
common  equity,  as of the latest practicable date: 126,292,749 shares of Common
Stock,  $0.001  par  value,  on  September  16,  2003.

DOCUMENTS  INCORPORATED  BY  REFERENCE

     If  the following documents are incorporated by reference, briefly describe
them and identify the part of the Form 10-KSB (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) into
which  the  document is incorporated: (1) any annual report to security holders;
(3) any proxy or information statement; and (3) any prospectus filed pursuant to
Rule  424(b)  or (c) of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act").  The list
documents  should be clearly described for identification purposes (e.g., annual
report  to  security  holders  for  fiscal  year  ended  December  24,  1990).

    Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one): Yes [ ] No [X]
















                                        2
<PAGE>



                                TABLE OF CONTENTS
                                                                            Page
                                                                            ----

Item  1.     Description  of  Business                                        1
             Business  Development                                            1
             Business  of  Concierge Technologies                             2

Item  2.     Description  of  Property                                        3
             Facilities                                                       3

Item  3.     Legal  Proceedings                                               4

Item  4.     Submission  of  Matters  to  a  Vote  of  Security
               Holders                                                        4

Item  5.     Market  for  Common  Equity  and  Related  Stockholder
               Matters                                                        4
             Holders                                                          5
             Dividends                                                        5
             Penny  Stock  Regulations                                        5

Item  6.     Plan  of  Operations                                             8

Item  7.     Financial  Statements                                           10

Item  8.     Changes  in  and  Disagreements  With  Accountants  On
               Accounting  and  Financial  Disclosure                        27

Item  9.     Directors,  Executive  Officers,  Promoters  and
               Control  Persons;  Compliance  with
               Section  16(a)  of  the  Exchange  Act                        27
               Section  16(a)  Beneficial  Ownership
                 Reporting  Compliance                                       28

Item 10.     Executive  Compensation                                         28
             Long-Term  Compensation                                         29

Item 11.     Security  Ownership  of  Certain  Beneficial  Owners
               and  Management                                               29

Item 12.     Certain Relationships and Related Transactions                  30

Item 13.     Exhibits  and  Reports  on  Form 8-K                            31
             (a)     Exhibits                                                31
             (b)     Reports  on  Form  8-K                                  32

Item 14.     Controls  and  Procedures                                       32

Signatures                                                                   33







                                        i

<PAGE>
ITEM  1.     DESCRIPTION  OF  BUSINESS

Business  Development

     Concierge  Technologies,  Inc. was incorporated in California on August 18,
1993  as  "Fanfest,  Inc."  On August 29, 1995 its name was changed to Starfest,
Inc.,  and  on  March  20, 2002 its name was changed to "Concierge Technologies,
Inc."

     Pursuant  to  a  Stock  Purchase Agreement (the "Purchase Agreement") dated
March 6, 2000 between MAS Capital, Inc., an Indiana corporation, the controlling
shareholder  of MAS Acquisition XX Corp. ("MAS XX"), an Indiana corporation, and
Starfest,  approximately  96.83  percent  (8,250,000  shares) of the outstanding
shares  of  common stock of MAS Acquisition XX Corp. were exchanged for $100,000
and  150,000  shares  of  common  stock  of  Starfest  in a transaction in which
Starfest  became  the  parent  corporation  of  MAS  XX.

     At  the  time  of  this  transaction, the market price of Starfest's common
stock  was  $1.50  bid  at  closing  on March 7, 2000 on the OTC Bulletin Board.
Accordingly,  the consideration Starfest paid for the 96.83 percent interest was
valued  at  $325,000.  Concierge loaned to Starfest the $100,000 cash portion of
the consideration evidenced by a no-interest, demand note.  Michael Huemmer, the
president  of Starfest, loaned to Starfest the 150,000 shares of common stock of
Starfest  that  was  the  stock  portion  of  the  consideration.

     Upon  execution  of  the  Purchase Agreement and the subsequent delivery of
$100,000  cash  and 150,000 shares of common stock of Starfest on March 7, 2000,
to  MAS  Capital  Inc.,  pursuant  to  Rule  12g-3(a)  of  the General Rules and
Regulations  of  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission, Starfest became the
successor  issuer  to  MAS Acquisition XX Corp. for reporting purposes under the
Securities  and  Exchange  Act  of  1934  and  elected  to  report under the Act
effective  March  7,  2000.

     MAS  XX  had  no business, no assets, and no liabilities at the time of the
transaction.  Starfest  entered  into  the transaction solely for the purpose of
becoming the successor issuer to MAS Acquisition XX Corp. for reporting purposes
under  the 1934 Exchange Act.  Prior to this transaction, Starfest was preparing
to  register  its  common  stock  with  the  Commission  in order to avoid being
delisted  by   the  OTC  Bulletin  Board.  By  engaging  in  the  Rule  12g-3(a)
transaction,  Starfest  avoided  the  possibility  that its planned registration
statement  with  the  Commission would not be fully reviewed by the Commission's
staff  before  an  April  2000 deadline, which would result in Starfest's common
stock  being  delisted  on  the  OTC  Bulletin  Board.

     An  agreement  of  merger  was entered into between Starfest and Concierge,
Inc.,  a  Nevada  corporation,  on  January  26,  2000.  The proposed merger was
submitted  to  the  shareholders of each of Starfest and Concierge pursuant to a
Form  S-4  Prospectus-Proxy  Statement  filed  with  the  Commission.

     As  described  in  Starfest's  Form  8-K  filed  on  April 2, 2002 with the
Commission  (Commission  File  No.  000-29913), the shareholders of Starfest and
Concierge  did  approve the merger, and the merger was legally effected on March
20,  2002.

                                        1
<PAGE>

          Pursuant  to  the  agreement of merger between Starfest and Concierge,

     -    Starfest  was  the  surviving  corporation,

     -    The  shareholders  of  Concierge received pro rata for their shares of
          common  stock  of  Concierge,  99,957,713  shares  of  common stock of
          Starfest  in  the merger, and all shares of capital stock of Concierge
          were  cancelled,

     -    The  fiscal  year-end  of  the  corporation  was  changed to June 30,

     -    The  officers  and  directors  of  Concierge  became  the officers and
          directors  of  Starfest,  and

     -    The  name  of  Starfest was  changed to "Concierge Technologies, Inc."

Business  of  Concierge  Technologies

     The  business  of  Concierge  Technologies  is  to  conceptualize,  design,
develop,  distribute  and  market  software,  hardware  and  services within the
personal  communications  industry.  As  of June 30, 2003, we offer one product,
which is known by the name "Personal Communications Attendant" or the "PCA". The
PCA  is in the form of a CD containing a proprietary program application coupled
with  licensed voice recognition and text-to-speech software than enables a user
to  retrieve  email  messages from any remote telephone and have the text of the
email  message  "read" in a computer generated voice. This product was developed
and  manufactured  in  limited  quantities prior to the completion of the merger
with  Starfest. Although the product was available for distribution, the Company
was  without  sufficient funds to properly market the product in timely fashion.
As  a  result  of the passing time, later introduction of new operating systems,
changes  in  email client code, changes in consumer buying habits, the expanding
presence  of  wireless  Internet  and email appliances, and the declining use of
dial-up voice modems have all contributed to the need to upgrade the PCA product
prior  to  re-engaging  an  aggressive  marketing  effort.

     With the PCA in its current form, we do not expect any significant revenues
to be generated from retail sales. Until such time as the PCA can be upgraded to
a later format, we will only offer the product for sale via its promotion on our
website,  www.conciergetech.com. The retail price of the PCA is $39.95. In order
to  expand  our channels to market in an economical fashion we intend to promote
the  product  via  cross-channel  marketing  on partner websites and to list the
product  for  sale  on  the commercial websites who charge a commission for each
sale  rather  than  a  payment  in  advance  for such promotion. We have not yet
initiated  such  listings  as  of  September  16,  2003.

     In  addition  to our efforts to liquidate our inventory of the PCA product,
of  which  we  have  approximately  14, 700 pieces, the company is also pursuing
acquisition  of synergistic products and companies that would enhance and update
our  presence  in  the  personal  communications  business. To date we have been

                                        2
<PAGE>

unsuccessful  in  completing such acquisitions, and there are no assurances that
we  will  be  successful in the future, however the strategy remains an integral
part  of  our  long  term  operating  plan.

     Governmental  Approval  of Principal Products.  No governmental approval is
required  in  the  U.S.  for  Concierge's  products.

     Government  Regulations.  There are no governmental regulations in the U.S.
that  apply  to  Concierge's  products.

     Dependence on Major Customers and Suppliers.  Concierge does not anticipate
that  it  will  be  dependent  on  any  major  customers  or  suppliers.

     Seasonality.  There  should  be  no seasonal aspect to Concierge's business
other  than  possible increased sales anticipated in the fourth calendar quarter
associated  with  the  year-end  holidays.

     Research  and  Development.  Concierge  expended  no  funds on research and
development  in  2003.

     Environmental  Controls.  Concierge is subject to no environmental controls
or  restrictions that require the outlay of capital or the obtaining of a permit
in  order  to  engage  in  business.

     Patents,  Trademarks,  Copyrights and Intellectual Property.  Concierge has
trademarked  its  Personal  Communications  Attendant.  It has no patents on the
product.

     Number  of  Employees

     On  June  30,  2003,  we  employed no persons full time and no persons part
time.

ITEM  2.     DESCRIPTION  OF  PROPERTY

     We  own  no  plants,  real  property  or  personal  property.

Facilities

     Our  office facilities are co-located with those of our president and chief
operations officer, David Neibert, at 22048 Sherman Way, Suite 301, Canoga Park,
CA 91303.  We have no lease and currently pay no rent.  In the event we are able
to secure the additional funds required to further our business plan, the shared
office  space  consisting  of approximately 880 square feet, including furniture
and  fixtures,  can  be  leased  by  us  for the amount of $1,235 per month on a
one-year  lease.  Should additional space be needed, there is ample office space
available  in  the  vicinity  at  competitive  prices.


                                        3
<PAGE>

ITEM  3.     LEGAL  PROCEEDINGS

     On May 6, 2002, a default judgment was awarded to Brookside Investments Ltd
against,  jointly  and  severally, our company, Allen E. Kahn, and The Whitehall
Companies in the amount of $135,000 plus interest and legal fees.  Concierge did
not  defend against the complaint by Brookside, which alleged that Brookside was
entitled  to  a  refund of their investment as a result of a breach of contract.
Brookside  had  entered  into a subscription agreement with Concierge, Inc. that
called  for,  among  other  things,  the  pending  merger  between  Starfest and
Concierge  to be completed within 180 days of the investment. The merger was not
completed  within  180  days  and Brookside sought a refund of their investment,
which  Concierge  was  unable  to  provide.

     As  of  September  16,  2003,  Brookside  has  not attempted to enforce its
judgment.  We  are in discussions with representatives from Brookside concerning
a  resolution  of the matter. As of September 16, 2003, we are unable to pay the
amount of the judgment and have no assets available to Brookside for liquidation
in  settlement  of  the  judgment.

     Neither  Concierge  Technologies  nor any of its property is the subject of
any  other  pending  legal  proceedings  or  any  proceeding that a governmental
authority  is  contemplating.

ITEM  4.     SUBMISSION  OF  MATTERS  TO  A  VOTE  OF  SECURITY  HOLDERS

     None

ITEM  5.     MARKET  FOR  COMMON  EQUITY  AND  RELATED  STOCKHOLDER  MATTERS

          Our Common Stock presently trades on the OTC Bulletin Board.  The high
and  low  bid  and  asked  prices, as reported by the OTC Bulletin Board, are as
follows  for  fiscal years ended June 30, 2002 and 2003.  The quotations reflect
inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not
represent  actual  transactions.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               Average Daily
                                  High           Low           Shares Traded
                                  ----          ---            -------------
          Calendar  2001:
<S>                               <C>            <C>             <C>
               3rd  Qtr.          0.215          0.035           110,617
               4th  Qtr.          0.26           0.05             98,005

          Calendar  2002:
               1st  Qtr.          0.14           0.049            41,877
               2nd  Qtr.          0.15           0.035           104,629
               3rd  Qtr.          0.055          0.012            92,100
               4th  Qtr.          0.026          0.003            94,449


                                        4
<PAGE>
          Calendar  2003:
               1st  Qtr.          0.02           0.01             65,828
               2nd  Qtr.          0.02           0.008            34,069
</TABLE>

Holders

     On  June  30,  2003  there  were approximately 299 holders of record of our
common  stock.  Approximately 66,210,659 shares are held for approximately 4,400
owners  of  our  common  stock  in the name of "Cede & Co.," which is the record
holder  for  shares  in  numerous  brokerage  accounts.

     Dividends.  We  have  had no earnings and have declared no dividends on our
capital stock.  Under California law, a company - such as our  company - can pay
dividends  only

     -     from  retained  earnings,  or

     -     if  after  the  dividend  is  made,

     -     its  tangible assets would equal at least 11/4 times its liabilities,
           and

          -     its current assets would at least equal its current liabilities,
                or

          -     if  the  average  of its earnings before income taxes and before
                interest  expenses  for the  last  two  years  was less than the
                average  of  its interest expenses for  the last two years, then
                its current assets must be equal to  at  least  11/4  times  its
                current  liabilities.

     The  directors'  strategy on dividends is to declare and pay dividends only
from  retained  earnings  and when the directors deem it prudent and in the best
interests  of  the  company  to  declare  and  pay  dividends.

Penny  Stock  Regulations

     Our common stock trades on the OTC Bulletin Board at a price less than $5 a
share  and  is  subject  to  the  rules  governing  "penny  stocks."

     A  "penny  stock"  is  any  stock  that:

     -     sells  for  less  than  $5  a  share.

     -     is  not  listed  on  an  exchange  or authorized for quotation on The
           Nasdaq  Stock  Market,  and

     -     is  not  a  stock  of  a  "substantial  issuer."  We  are  not  now a
           "substantial issuer" and cannot become one until we have net tangible
           assets of at  least  $2  million.


                                        5
<PAGE>

     There  are  statutes  and  regulations  of  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  (the  "Commission")  that  impose  a  strict regimen on brokers that
recommend  penny  stocks.

     The  Penny  Stock  Suitability  Rule
     ------------------------------------

     Before  a  broker-dealer  can  recommend  and  sell  a penny stock to a new
customer who is not an institutional accredited investor, the broker-dealer must
obtain  from  the  customer  information  concerning  the  person's  financial
situation,  investment  experience  and  investment  objectives.  Then,  the
broker-dealer  must "reasonably determine" (1) that transactions in penny stocks
are  suitable for the person and (2) that the person, or his advisor, is capable
of  evaluating  the  risks  in  penny  stocks.

     After  making  this  determination,  the  broker-dealer  must  furnish  the
customer  with  a written statement setting forth the basis for this suitability
determination.  The  customer must sign and date a copy of the written statement
and  return  it  to  the  broker-dealer.

     Finally  the  broker-dealer  must  also  obtain from the customer a written
agreement  to  purchase the penny stock, identifying the stock and the number of
shares  to  be  purchased.

     The  above  exercise  delays  a  proposed  transaction.  It  causes  many
broker-dealer  firms  to adopt a policy of not allowing their representatives to
recommend  penny  stocks  to  their  customers.

     The  Penny  Stock  Suitability  Rule,  described above, and the Penny Stock
Disclosure  Rule,  described  below,  do  not  apply  to  the  following:

     -    transactions  not  recommended  by  the  broker-dealer,

     -    sales  to  institutional  accredited  investors,

     -    transactions  in  which  the  customer is a director, officer, general
          partner, or direct or indirect beneficial owner of more than 5 percent
          of  any class of equity security of the issuer of the penny stock that
          is  the  subject  of  the  transaction,  and

     -    transactions  in   penny  stocks  by  broker-dealers whose income from
          penny  stock  activities  does  not exceed five percent of their total
          income  during  certain  defined  periods.

     The  Penny  Stock  Disclosure  Rule
     -----------------------------------

     Another  Commission  rule  -  the  Penny stock Disclosure Rule - requires a
broker-dealer,  who  recommends  the  sale  of  a penny stock to a customer in a
transaction not exempt from the suitability rule described above, to furnish the
customer  with  a  "risk  disclosure document."  This document is set forth in a
federal  regulation  and  contains  the  following  information:

     -    A statement  that penny stocks can be very risky, that investors often
          cannot sell a penny stock back to the dealer that sold them the stock,


                                        6
<PAGE>

     -    A  warning  that  salespersons  of  penny  stocks  are  not  impartial
          advisers  but  are  paid  to  sell  the  stock,

     -    The  statement  that  federal law requires the salesperson to tell the
          potential  investor  in  a  penny  stock  -

          -     the  "offer"  and  the  "bid"  on  the  stock,  and

          -     the  compensation  the salesperson and his firm will receive for
                the  trade,

     -    An  explanation  that   the  offer  price  and  the  bid price are the
          wholesale  prices  at  which  dealers  are willing to sell and buy the
          stock  from  other  dealers, and that in its trade with a customer the
          dealer  may  add  a  retail  charge  to  these  wholesale  prices,

     -    A warning  that a large spread between the bid and the offer price can
          make  the  resale  of  the  stock  very  costly,

     -    Telephone  numbers   a  person  can  call  if he or she is a victim of
          fraud,

     -    Admonitions  -

          -     to  use  caution  when  investing  in  penny  stocks,

          -     to  understand  the  risky  nature  of  penny  stocks,

          -     to  know the brokerage firm and the salespeople with whom one is
                dealing,  and

          -     to  be  cautious  if  ones  salesperson  leaves  the  firm.

Finally,  the  customer  must  be  furnished  with a monthly statement including
prescribed  information  relating to market and price information concerning the
penny  stocks  held  in  the  customer's  account.

     Effects  of  the  Rule
     ----------------------

     The  above  penny stock regulatory scheme is a response by the Congress and
the  Commission to known abuses in the telemarketing of low-priced securities by
"boiler  shop" operators.  The scheme imposes market impediments on the sale and
trading of penny stocks.  It has a limiting effect on a stockholder's ability to
resell  a  penny  stock.

     Our shares likely will trade below $5 a share on the OTC Bulletin Board and
be,  for  some  time  at least, shares of a "penny stock" subject to the trading
market  impediments  described  above.


                                        7
<PAGE>
Recent  Sales  of  Unregistered  Securities;  Outstanding  Stock  Options

     Our  company  sold the following shares of its common stock during the last
three  years  without  registering  the  shares:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                 Value of
      Date            No. of Shares  Name of Purchaser  Type of Consideration  Consideration
      ----            -------------  -----------------  ---------------------  -------------
<S>                    <C>           <C>                <C>                      <C>
August  12,  2002        500,000     Samuel  Wu         Cash                      $30,000
June  20,  2002        2,532,581     John  Everding     Services                 $119,031
August  12,  2002      2,870,259     Ken  Lamkin        Services                 $134,873
August  12,  2002        405,213     Trudy  Self        Services                  $19,041
</TABLE>

     All  of  the  above  sales   were  made  pursuant  to  the  exemption  from
registration  provided  by  the   Commission's  Regulation  D,  Rule  506.   All
purchasers  were either accredited investors or, if not, were provided copies of
the  company's recent filings with the Commission including financial statements
meeting  the  requirements  of the Commission's Item 310 of Regulation S-B.  All
purchasers  were  provided  the  opportunity  to  ask  questions  of Concierge's
management.

     No  equity  of  Starfest  is  subject to outstanding options or warrants to
purchase,  or  securities  convertible  into,  equity  of  the  company.

ITEM  6.     PLAN  OF  OPERATIONS

     Our  plan of operation for the next twelve months is to source and secure a
development  partner to upgrade the PCA to a viable commercial product.  We have
initiated  discussions with several companies that have the expertise to further
the  development  of  the PCA to modern operating systems, and to also provide a
multi-user  version  as  well as other feature set upgrades. The final nature of
the  proposed  relationship  between us and any development partner is yet to be
determined.  Once  the  multi-user, upgraded version of the PCA is completed, we
intend  to  continue our marketing efforts via direct mail, bundled OEM software
with  new PCs, web-based advertising and a physical presence at retail points of
purchase.  In  order  to  complete  the  development  and initiate the marketing
efforts,  we  project  that  $500,000  of  expenses  will  be  incurred prior to
achieving  a break-even cash flow position. There is currently no assurance that
we  will  be  able  to  source the needed funds, or that if we are successful in
sourcing  funds through either debt or equity financing, that such funds will be
sufficient  to  achieve  profitability.

     In  addition  to  pursuing  an  upgrade to our current product offering, we
intend  to aggressively pursue other opportunities in the field of communication
services  by  partnering  with  start-up  and  development stage companies whose
products  are  in  the  introductory  stages.  Through  a combination of product
offerings   including  wireless  airtime,  wireless  Internet  access,  software
offerings,  and  subscription services, we hope to build a vertically integrated
company  able   to  respond  in  timely  fashion  to  the  consumer  demand  for
communications   services.  Our  management  believes  that  such  a  vertically
integrated company will be worth, as a whole, more than the sum of the otherwise
separate  entities. As such, management expects the consolidated company to be a
more  attractive  investment opportunity for the financial community in general.


                                        8
<PAGE>

     Leveraging the expertise of its management and directors, who are currently
providing  their  time  without charge, we have established contact with several
likely  strategic  partners.  Should  we  be  successful  in  our  negotiations,
management  hopes  to  be  able  to acquire control of certain of these targeted
companies  through  an  equity exchange and cash compensation. Management is not
seeking  a  transaction that would result in a change of control; however, it is
likely  that,  if  the  transactions  being contemplated by management are to be
carried  through  to  conclusion,  our  current  shareholders  would suffer some
dilution. Further dilution to current shareholders is also possible, and likely,
to  occur  simultaneous  with  a  successful  financing  effort.

     On  June  17,  2002,  David  W.  Neibert  became  our  president  and chief
operations  officer.  Upon  assuming  that role, he moved the general accounting
and  administrative  offices  of  the  company to co-location with his firm, The
Wallen  Group. We do not currently pay rent and have no lease for the facilities
being  provided  by  Mr.  Neibert.  He  has agreed to provide his services at no
charge to the company until such time as we are in a financial position to pay a
reasonable  salary  commensurate  with  compensation  packages  paid  to  other
executives  of publicly traded companies in similar stages of development within
the  personal  communications  industry.

     As  of  September  16, 2003, we had no employees other than unpaid officers
and  no  fixed  overhead  other than the variable cost of web hosting, legal and
professional  fees, fees charged by our transfer agent and minimum tax payments.
We  own  no  office  fixtures,  furniture  or  appliances.

Liquidity
---------

     Our  only  source  of  operating  capital  has been funding sourced through
insiders  or  shareholders  under  the  terms of unsecured promissory notes. The
amount  of  borrowed  funds  have  been  sufficient to pay the cost of legal and
accounting  fees  as  necessary  to maintain a current reporting status with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission.   However,  sufficient  funds  have  been
unavailable  to  pay  down commercial and vendor accounts payable.  We have also
been  unable  to  pay  salaries  to  our  officers  and  several  of our outside
consultants  who  had  performed  services  earlier  in  the  fiscal  year.

     Although our management will continue to provide service to the Company for
the  near term without pay, we will still require additional funding to maintain
the corporation and further the development of the PCA product. Management hopes
to source the needed funds through a debt financing of the acquisitions targeted
for the next several months. If the financing is not available, the acquisitions
themselves  will also not be completed. In the event either the financing or the
proposed  acquisitions  are  not  completed,  our  funds  will  be exhausted and
continuing  operations  may  be  impossible.













                                        9
<PAGE>

ITEM  7.     FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  INDEX

     The  financial  statements  of  the  company  appear  as  follows:

     Independent  Auditors'  Report                                          12
     Balance  Sheet,  June  30,  2003                                        13
     Statements  of  Operations,  Twelve  Months  Ended  June  30,
          2003  and  June  30,  2002  and  the  Period  from
          September 20, 1996 (Inception) to June 30, 2003                    14
     Statements  of  Changes  in  Stockholders'  Equity  (Deficit),
          Advance  Subscriptions  and  Common  Stock
          Subject  to  Contingency  for  the  Period  September  30,
          1996  (Inception)  to  June  30, 2003                              15
     Statements  of  Cash  Flows,  Years  Ended  June  30,  2003
          and  June  30,  2002  and  the  Period  from
          September 20, 1996 (Inception) to June 30, 2003                    17
     Notes  to  Financial  Statements                                        18





















                                       10

<PAGE>



                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT


To  the  Stockholders  and  Board  of  Directors
Concierge  Technologies,  Inc.

We  have  audited the accompanying balance sheet of Concierge Technologies, Inc.
(a  development stage company) as of June 30, 2003 and the related statements of
operations,  stockholders'  equity  and cash flows for the period then ended and
for  the  period  from  September  20, 1996 (inception), to June 30, 2003. These
financial  statements  are  the  responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility  is  to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our  audit.

We  conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in  the  United  States  of  America.  Those  standards require that we plan and
perform  the  audit  to  obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a
test  basis,  evidence  supporting  the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant  estimates  made  by  management,  as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provide a reasonable
basis  for  our  opinion.

In  our  opinion,  the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Concierge Technologies, Inc. as
of  June  30,  2003 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the
period  then ended and from September 20, 1996 (inception), to June 30, 2003, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.

The  Company's  financial  statements  are prepared using the generally accepted
accounting  principles  applicable  to  a  going concern, which contemplates the
realization  of  assets  and  liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of
business.  The  Company's has not earned any revenue since its inception and has
incurred  a  net  loss  of  $2,805,837  through  June 30, 2003. These factors as
discussed  in Note 3 to the financial statements, raises substantial doubt about
the  Company's  ability  to  continue  as a going concern. Management's plans in
regard  to  these matters are also described in Note 3. The financial statements
do  not  include  any  adjustments  that  might  result from the outcome of this
uncertainty.


/s/  Kabani  &  Company,  Inc.

KABANI  &  COMPANY,  INC.
CERTIFIED  PUBLIC  ACCOUNTANTS

Fountain  Valley,  California
September  29,  2003


<PAGE>

                          CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                          (A development stage company)
                                  BALANCE SHEET
                                  JUNE 30, 2003


                                     ASSETS
                                     ------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CURRENT  ASSETS:
<S>                                                                 <C>
     Cash & cash equivalents                                        $     1,437

PREPAID EXPENSES                                                        245,800
                                                                    -----------

                                                                    $   247,237
                                                                    ===========

                      LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

CURRENT  LIABILITIES:
     Accrued expenses                                               $   363,447
     Loans payable-shareholders                                         290,208
                                                                    -----------
          Total current liabilities                                     653,655

Note payable, related party - long term                                  36,500

SUBSCRIPTIONS  RECEIVED  FOR  COMMON  STOCK
  SUBJECT TO CONTINGENCY                                              1,663,290

COMMON STOCK ISSUED SUBJECT TO CONTINGENCY                              266,610

STOCKHOLDERS'  DEFICIT:
     Preferred stock, par value $.001 per share; 10,000,000
     shares authorized; none issued                                           -
     Common stock, par value $.001 per share; 190,000,000
     shares authorized; issued and outstanding 126,292,749              126,365
     Additional paid in capital                                         306,654
     Deficit accumulated during the development stage                (2,805,837)
                                                                    -----------
          Total stockholders' deficit                                (2,372,818)
                                                                    -----------

                                                                    $   247,237
                                                                    ===========
</TABLE>


   The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

                                       13
<PAGE>

                          CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                          (A development stage company)
                            STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
             YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2003 AND 2002 AND THE PERIOD FROM
                SEPTEMBER 20, 1996 (INCEPTION) TO JUNE 30, 2003

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  SEPTEMBER 20,
                                    JUNE 30,          JUNE 30,  1996 (INCEPTION)
                                     2003              2002     TO JUNE 30, 2003
                               --------------   --------------  ----------------
<S>                            <C>              <C>              <C>
REVENUE                        $            -   $            -   $            -

COSTS  AND  EXPENSES
  Product launch expenses                   -                -        1,077,785
  General & Administrative
    expenses                           46,472          395,029        1,361,525
                               --------------   --------------   --------------
  TOTAL COSTS AND EXPENSES             46,472          395,029        2,439,310

OTHER  INCOME/(EXPENSES)
  Settlement  income,  net                  -           52,600           52,600
  Litigation  settlement                    -         (135,000)        (135,000)
                               --------------   --------------   --------------
    TOTAL OTHER
      INCOME/(EXPENSES)                     -          (82,400)         (82,400)

NET LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES          (46,472)        (477,429)      (2,521,710)

  Provision of income taxes               800              800            5,600
                               --------------   --------------   --------------

NET LOSS                       $      (47,272)  $     (478,229)  $   (2,527,310)
                               ==============   ==============   ==============

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES
  OF  COMMON  STOCK
  OUTSTANDING, BASIC AND
  DILUTED                         125,866,713      120,134,037
                               ==============   ==============

BASIC AND DILUTED NET
  LOSS PER SHARE               $       (0.000)  $       (0.004)
                               ==============   ==============
</TABLE>




















   The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

                                       14
<PAGE>

                          CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                          (A development stage company)
             STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
         FOR THE PERIOD SEPTEMBER 20, 1996 (INCEPTION) TO JUNE 30, 2003

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               Common Stock
                                      ---------------------------------
                                       Number of     Par        Additional       Shares       Accumulated    Stockholders'
                                        shares      value    Paid In Capital  to be issued      Deficit      Equity (deficit)
                                     -----------  ---------  ---------------  ------------   -------------   ----------------
<S>                                 <C>           <C>           <C>            <C>            <C>              <C>
Common  Stock  issued  for  cash
  through June 30, 1997                 176,306   $   1,763     $ 106,162              -      $          -     $    107,925

Common stock issued for services
  through June 30, 1997                 621,545       6,215             -              -                 -            6,215

Net loss through June 30, 1997                -           -             -              -           (96,933)         (96,933)
                                    -----------   ---------    ----------        -------      ------------     ------------
Balance at June 30, 1997                797,851       7,978       106,162              -           (96,933)          17,207

Common Stock issued for cash
  in the year ended June 30, 1998       137,475       1,375       194,650              -                 -          196,025

Common stock issued for services
  in the year ended June 30, 1998        22,550         226             -              -                 -              226

Net loss for the year ended
  June 30, 1998                               -           -             -              -          (283,891)        (283,891)
                                    -----------   ---------    ----------        -------      ------------     ------------

Balance at June 30, 1998                957,876       9,579       300,812              -          (380,824)         (70,433)

Common Stock issued for cash
  in the year ended June 30, 1999       208,000           -             -              -                 -                -

Common stock issued for services
  in the year ended June 30, 1999           450           -             -              -                 -                -

Net loss for the year ended
  June 30, 1999                               -           -             -              -           (89,919)         (89,919)
                                    -----------   ---------    ----------        -------      ------------     ------------

Balance at June 30, 1999              1,166,326       9,579       300,812              -          (470,743)        (160,352)

Acquisition  and  retirement
  of  Common  shares                   (262,000)     (2,620)            -              -                 -           (2,620)

Common Stock issued for cash
  in the year ended June 30, 2000       117,184           -             -              -                 -                -

Common stock issued for services
  in the year ended June 30, 2000       354,870           -             -              -                 -                -

Post acquisition stock
  subscription  funds
  received net of costs
  & expenses of $79,710                       -           -             -              -                 -                -

Net loss for the year ended
  June 30, 2000                               -           -             -              -          (986,986)        (986,986)
                                    -----------   ---------    ----------        -------      ------------     ------------
Balance at June 30, 2000              1,376,380       6,959       300,812              -        (1,457,729)      (1,149,958)

Post acquisition stock
  subscription  funds
  received                                    -           -             -              -                 -                -

Net loss for the year
  ended June 30, 2001                         -           -             -              -          (544,080)        (544,080)
                                    -----------   ---------    ----------        -------      ------------     ------------

Balance at June 30, 2001              1,376,380       6,959       300,812              -        (2,001,809)      (1,694,038)

Recalitalization upon merger        118,681,333     113,099      (300,812)             -          (278,527)        (466,240)

Stock subscription funds received             -           -             -         29,983                 -           29,983

Stock  issued  for  services          2,532,581     119,031             -              -                 -          119,031

Stock to be issued for
  services-3,275,472 shares                   -           -             -        153,947                 -          153,947

Adjustment to paid in
  capital on merger                           -    (116,499)      116,499              -                 -                -

Net loss for the year
  ended June 30, 2002                         -           -             -              -          (478,229)        (478,229)
                                    -----------   ---------    ----------        -------      ------------     ------------

Balance at June 30, 2002            122,590,294     122,590       116,499        183,930        (2,758,565)      (2,335,546)


   The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

                                       15

<PAGE>

Stock issued for subscription
  received in the prior year            500,000         500        29,483        (29,983)                -                -

Stock issued for services
  included in the prior period        3,275,472       3,275       150,672       (153,947)                -                -

Forfeiture of stock subscription              -           -        10,000              -                 -           10,000

Cancellation of over issued
  shares on recapitaliztion             (73,017)          -             -              -                 -                -

Net loss for the year ended
  June 30, 2003                               -           -             -             -            (47,272)         (47,272)
                                    -----------   ---------    ----------        -------      ------------     ------------

Balance at June 30, 2003            126,292,749   $ 126,365   $   306,654        $     -    $    (2,805,837)    $ (2,372,818)
                                    ===========   =========   ===========        =======    ===============     ============
</TABLE>






































   The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

                                       16
<PAGE>

                          CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                          (A development stage company)
                            STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
             YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2003 AND 2002 AND THE PERIOD FROM
                SEPTEMBER 20, 1996 (INCEPTION) TO JUNE 30, 2003

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                             SEPTEMBER 20,
                                              JUNE 30,          JUNE 30,  1996 (INCEPTION)
                                               2003              2002     TO JUNE 30, 2003
                                         --------------   --------------  ----------------
<S>                                      <C>              <C>              <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
     Net loss                            $     (47,272)   $    (478,229)   $  (2,527,310)
     Adjustments to reconcile  net
       loss to net cash  used  in
       operating  activities:
          Depreciation and amortization            903            1,207           12,910
          Stock issued for services                  -          119,031          126,405
          Stock to be issued for
            services                                 -          153,947          153,947
          Increase in current assets:
               Prepaid  expenses                     -                -         (245,800)
          Increase  in  current
            liabilities:
               Accrued expenses                 14,651          173,521          278,915
                                         -------------    -------------     ------------
          Net cash used in
            operating activities               (31,718)         (30,523)      (2,200,933)
                                         -------------    -------------     ------------

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
          Note  receivable -
            related party                            -                -         (100,000)
          Acquisition  of  property &
            equipment                                -                -          (12,910)
                                         -------------    -------------     ------------
          Net cash used in investing
            activities                               -                -         (112,910)
                                         -------------    -------------     ------------

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
          Proceeds  from  Issuance
            of  Shares                               -                -          567,007
          Proceed  from  stock
            subscription  forfeited             10,000                -           10,000
          Proceeds  from  advance
            subscriptions                            -           29,983        1,772,983
          Costs  and  expenses  of
            advance  subscriptions                   -                -          (79,710)
          Proceeds  from  related
            party  loans                        22,500              500           45,000
                                         -------------    -------------     ------------
          Net cash provided by
            financing activities                32,500           30,483        2,315,280
                                         -------------    -------------     ------------

NET INCREASE/(DECREASE) IN CASH &
  CASH EQUIVALENTS                                 782              (40)           1,437

CASH  &  CASH  EQUIVALENTS,
  BEGINNING  BALANCE                               655              695                -
                                         -------------    -------------     ------------

CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS,
  ENDING BALANCE                         $       1,437    $         655     $      1,437
                                         =============    =============     ============
</TABLE>





   The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

                                       17
<PAGE>

                          CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                          (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


1.     DESCRIPTION  OF  BUSINESS  AND  BASIS  OF  PRESENTATION

Concierge  Technologies,  Inc.,  (formerly,  Starfest,  Inc.)  (the  Company), a
California corporation, was incorporated on August 18, 1993 as Fanfest, Inc.  In
August,  1995  the  Company changed its name to Starfest, Inc.  During 1998, the
Company  was inactive, just having minimal administrative expenses.  During 1999
the  Company  attempted  to  pursue operations in the online adult entertainment
field.  There  were  no  revenues  from  this  endeavor.  On March 20, 2002, the
Company  changed  its  name  to  Concierge  Technologies,  Inc.

In  March  2000,  the  Company  acquired  approximately 96.83 percent (8,250,000
shares)  of  the common stock of MAS Acquisition XX Corp. (MAS XX) for $314,688.
This amount was expensed in March 2000 as at the time of the acquisition, MAS XX
had  no  assets  or liabilities and was inactive. On March 21, 2002, the Company
consummated  a  merger  with  Concierge,  Inc.  (Note  12).

Concierge,  Inc.  ("CI"), was a development stage enterprise incorporated in the
state  of  Nevada  on September 20, 1996.  The CI had undertaken the development
and  marketing  of  a  new technology, a unified messaging product "The Personal
Communications  Attendant"  ("PCA  ").  "PCA " will provide a means by which the
user  of  Internet  e-mail  can  have e-mail messages spoken to him/her over any
touch-tone  telephone  or  wireless  phone  any  where  in  the  world.

The accounting policies of the Company are in accordance with generally accepted
accounting  principles  and  conform  to the standards applicable to development
stage  companies.

2.     SUMMARY  OF  SIGNIFICANT  ACCOUNTING  POLICIES

Cash  and  cash  equivalents

The  Company considers all liquid investments with a maturity of three months or
less from the date of purchase that are readily convertible into cash to be cash
equivalents.

Use  of  estimates

The  preparation  of  financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect  the  reported  amounts  of  assets  and  liabilities  and  disclosure of
contingent  assets  and  liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the  reported  amounts  of  revenues  and  expenses during the reporting period.
Actual  results  could  differ  from  those  estimates.

Equipment

Equipment  is  carried  at cost. Depreciation of equipment is provided using the
straight-line  method  over  the  estimated  useful  lives  of  the  assets. The
equipment is fully depreciated as of June 30, 2003. Expenditures for maintenance
and  repairs  are  charged  to  expense  as  incurred.

Income  taxes

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed annually for differences
between  the  financial  statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities that
will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based on enacted laws

                                       18
<PAGE>
                          CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                          (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


and  rates  applicable  to  the periods in which the differences are expected to
affect  taxable income (loss). Valuation allowance is established when necessary
to  reduce  deferred  tax  assets  to  the  amount  expected  to  be  realized.

Basic  and  diluted  net  loss  per  share

Net  loss  per share is calculated in accordance with the Statement of financial
accounting  standards No. 128 (SFAS No. 128), "Earnings per share". SFAS No. 128
superseded  Accounting  Principles  Board  Opinion  No.15 (APB 15). Net loss per
share  for  all  periods  presented has been restated to reflect the adoption of
SFAS No. 128. Basic net loss per share is based upon the weighted average number
of  common  shares  outstanding.  Diluted  net  loss  per  share is based on the
assumption that all dilutive convertible shares and stock options were converted
or  exercised. Dilution is computed by applying the treasury stock method. Under
this  method,  options and warrants are assumed to be exercised at the beginning
of  the  period (or at the time of issuance, if later), and as if funds obtained
thereby  were  used  to purchase common stock at the average market price during
the  period.

Stock-based  compensation

In  October  1995,  the  FASB  issued  SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation".  SFAS  No.  123 prescribes accounting and reporting standards for
all stock-based compensation plans, including employee stock options, restricted
stock, employee stock purchase plans and stock appreciation rights. SFAS No. 123
requires compensation expense to be recorded (i) using the new fair value method
or  (ii) using the existing accounting rules prescribed by Accounting Principles
Board  Opinion  No.  25, "Accounting for stock issued to employees" (APB 25) and
related  interpretations  with  pro  forma  disclosure  of  what  net income and
earnings  per  share  would have been had the Company adopted the new fair value
method.  The company uses the intrinsic value method prescribed by APB25 and has
opted  for  the disclosure provisions of SFAS No.123. The implementation of this
standard did not have any material impact on the Company's financial statements.

Issuance  of  shares  for  service

Valuation  of shares for services is based on the estimated fair market value of
the  services  performed.

Fair  value  of  financial  instruments

Statement of financial accounting standard No. 107, Disclosures about fair value
of  financial  instruments,  requires  that  the Company disclose estimated fair
values of financial instruments. The carrying amounts reported in the statements
of  financial  position for current assets and current liabilities qualifying as
financial  instruments  are  a  reasonable  estimate  of  fair  value.

Accounting for the costs of computer software developed or obtained for internal
use

In  March  1998,  the  Accounting  Standards Executive Committee of the American
Institute  of  Certified  Public Accountants (ASEC of AICPA) issued Statement of
position  (SOP)  No.  98-1,  "Accounting  for  the  costs  of  computer software
developed  or  obtained  for internal use", effective for fiscal years beginning
after  December  15,  1998. SOP N0. 98-1 requires that certain costs of computer
software  developed  or  obtained  for internal use be capitalized and amortized
over  the useful life of the related software. The Company adopted this standard
in  fiscal  year  1999  and  the  implementation of this standard did not have a
material  impact  on  its  financial  statements.


                                       19
<PAGE>
                          CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                          (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


Web  site  development  costs

In  March  2000,  the  Emergency  Issues  Task  Force  (EITF) of FASB issued its
consensus  under  EITF-00-02.  Per  the consensus, certain costs incurred in the
development  of  a  Web site should be capitalized. According to the EITF, those
costs  incurred  in  developing  a  software  program  should  be capitalized in
accordance  with  Statement of Position (SOP) 98-1, "Accounting for the costs of
Computer  Software  Developed  or  obtained for internal use". Capitalization of
software  development  costs  begins  upon  the  establishment  of technological
feasibility.  The  establishment  of  technological  feasibility and the ongoing
assessment  of  recoverability of capitalized software development costs require
considerable  judgment  by  management with respect to certain external factors,
including,  but  not limited to, anticipated future revenues, estimated economic
life,  and  changes  in software and hardware technologies. The Company expenses
web  site  development  costs,  which  are  allocated  for  preliminary  project
development,  web  site  general  and  maintenance.

Costs  of  start-up  activities

In April 1998, the ASEC of AICPA issued SOP No. 98-5, "Reporting on the costs of
start-up  activities",  effective  for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
1998.  SOP 98-5 requires the costs of start-up activities and organization costs
to  be  expensed  as  incurred. The Company adopted this standard in fiscal year
1999  and  the implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on
its  financial  statements.

Research  and  Development

Expenditures  for  software  development  costs  and  research  are  expensed as
incurred.  Such  costs  are  required  to  be  expensed  until  the  point  that
technological  feasibility  is  established.  The  period  between  achieving
technological feasibility and the general availability of such software has been
short.  Consequently,  costs  otherwise  capitalizable  after  technological
feasibility  is  achieved are generally expensed because they are insignificant.

Revenue  Recognition

Revenue  Recognition  Revenue  is  recognized when earned. The Company's revenue
recognition  policies  are  in  compliance  with  all  applicable  accounting
regulations,  including  American  Institute  of  Certified  Public  Accountants
(AICPA)  Statement of Position (SOP) 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, and SOP
98-9,  Modification  of  SOP 97-2, With Respect to Certain Transactions. Revenue
from  license  programs is recorded when the software has been delivered and the
customer  is  invoiced.  Revenue  from  packaged  product  sales  to and through
distributors  and  resellers  is recorded when related products are shipped. The
Company  does  not  charge  monthly  service  fee, instead charges only one-time
purchase  price  and  the option of buying upgrades at a fixed fee based on fair
value  of  the  upgrade.  When  the  revenue  recognition  criteria required for
distributor  and  reseller  arrangements  are  not met, revenue is recognized as
payments are received. Costs related to insignificant obligations, which include
telephone support for certain products, are accrued. Provisions are recorded for
returns,  concessions  and  bad  debts. Cost of revenue includes direct costs to
produce  and  distribute  product  and  direct costs to provide online services,
consulting,  product  support,  and  training  and  certification  of  system
integrators.  Research  and  development  costs  are  expensed  as incurred. The
company  did  not  earn  any  revenue in the years ended June 30, 2003 and 2002.


                                       20
<PAGE>
                          CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                          (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


Allowance  for  doubtful  accounts

In determining the allowance to be maintained, management evaluates many factors
including  industry  and historical loss experience.  The allowance for doubtful
accounts is maintained at an amount management deems adequate to cover estimated
losses.  The  company did not have accounts receivable or allowance for doubtful
accounts  as  of  June  30,  2003  and  2002.

Advertising

The  Company  expenses  advertising  costs  as  incurred.

Reclassifications

Certain  prior  period  amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current
period  presentation.

2.     RECENT  PRONOUNCEMENTS

In  December  2002,  the  FASB  issued  SFAS No. 148 "Accounting for Stock Based
Compensation-Transition  and  Disclosure".  SFAS  No.  148  amends SFAS No. 123,
"Accounting  for  Stock  Based  Compensation", to provide alternative methods of
transition  for  a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting
for  stock-based  employee compensation.  In addition, this Statement amends the
disclosure  requirements  of  Statement  123 to require prominent disclosures in
both  annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for
stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used, on reported
results.  The Statement is effective for the Companies' interim reporting period
ending  January  31,  2003.  The  adoption  of SFAS 148 does not have a material
effect  on  the  earnings  or  financial  position  of  the  Company.

On  April  30 2003, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 149 (SFAS 149), Amendment
of  Statement  133  on  Derivative  Instruments and Hedging Activities. SFAS 149
amends  and  clarifies  the  accounting  guidance  on (1) derivative instruments
(including  certain  derivative instruments embedded in other contracts) and (2)
hedging  activities  that  fall within the scope of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS
133),  Accounting  for  Derivative  Instruments and Hedging Activities. SFAS 149
also  amends  certain  other  existing pronouncements, which will result in more
consistent reporting of contracts that are derivatives in their entirety or that
contain  embedded  derivatives  that  warrant  separate  accounting. SFAS 149 is
effective  (1)  for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003, with
certain  exceptions, and (2) for hedging relationships designated after June 30,
2003. The guidance is to be applied prospectively. The adoption of SFAS 149 does
not have a material effect on the earnings or financial position of the Company.

On  May  15,  2003,  the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB
Statement  No. 150 (SFAS 150), Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with
Characteristics  of both Liabilities and Equity. SFAS 150 changes the accounting
for  certain  financial  instruments  that,  under  previous  guidance, could be
classified  as  equity or "mezzanine" equity, by now requiring those instruments
to  be  classified  as  liabilities  (or  assets  in  some circumstances) in the
statement of financial position. Further, SFAS 150 requires disclosure regarding
the  terms of those instruments and settlement alternatives. SFAS 150 affects an
entity's  classification  of  the  following  freestanding  instruments:  a)
Mandatorily  redeemable  instruments  b)  Financial instruments to repurchase an
entity's  own  equity instruments c) Financial instruments embodying obligations

                                       21
<PAGE>
                          CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                          (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


that  the  issuer must or could choose to settle by issuing a variable number of
its  shares  or  other  equity  instruments based solely on (i) a fixed monetary
amount known at inception or (ii) something other than changes in its own equity
instruments  d)  SFAS  150  does  not  apply to features embedded in a financial
instrument that is not a derivative in its entirety. The guidance in SFAS 150 is
generally effective for all financial instruments entered into or modified after
May  31,  2003, and is otherwise effective at the beginning of the first interim
period  beginning  after  June  15,  2003.  For  private  companies, mandatorily
redeemable  financial  instruments are subject to the provisions of SFAS 150 for
the  fiscal  period  beginning after December 15, 2003. The adoption of SFAS 150
does  not  have  a  material effect on the earnings or financial position of the
Company.

3.     GOING  CONCERN

The  accompanying  financial  statements  have  been prepared in conformity with
generally  accepted  accounting principles which contemplate continuation of the
Company  as  a  going  concern.  However, the Company's did not earn any revenue
during the year ended June 30, 2003 and the Company has incurred net losses from
inception  to June 30, 2003 of $2,805,837 including a net loss of $47,272 during
the  year ended June 30, 2003. The continuing losses have adversely affected the
liquidity  of  the  Company.  Losses  are expected to continue for the immediate
future.  The  Company faces continuing significant business risks, including but
not  limited  to,  its  ability to maintain vendor and supplier relationships by
making  timely  payments  when  due.

In view of the matters described in the preceding paragraph, recoverability of a
major  portion  of  the recorded asset amounts shown in the accompanying balance
sheet  is  dependent  upon continued operations of the Company, which in turn is
dependent  upon  the  Company's  ability  to  raise  additional  capital, obtain
financing  and to succeed in its future operations.  The financial statements do
not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of
recorded  asset  amounts or amounts and classification of liabilities that might
be  necessary  should  the  Company  be  unable  to continue as a going concern.

Management  has  taken the following steps to revise its operating and financial
requirements,  which  it believes are sufficient to provide the Company with the
ability  to continue as a going concern.  Management devoted considerable effort
from  inception  through  the  year  ended  June 30, 2003, towards (i) obtaining
additional equity (ii) management of accrued expenses and accounts payable (iii)
Development  of  the software "PCA " and (vi) evaluation of its distribution and
marketing  methods.

Management  believes  that  the above actions will allow the Company to continue
operations  through  the  next  fiscal  year.

4.     EQUIPMENT
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           June  30, 2003        June 30, 2002
                                           --------------        -------------
<S>                                          <C>                   <C>
         Equipment                           $   12,910            $   12,910
         Less:  Accumulated depreciation         12,910                12,007
                                             ----------            ----------
                                             $        -            $      903
                                             ==========            ==========
</TABLE>

5.     PREPAID  EXPENSES

The  Company  entered  into  software  license  agreements  with  two  Delaware
Corporations.  One  Corporation granted permission to the Company to utilize its
software  for  the  "PCA  "  development.  The  corporation was paid $202,500 as
initial  non-refundable license fee and was considered to be pre-paid royalties.
The  agreement calls for Concierge, Inc. to pay a royalty of $1.00 for the first
million  units  sold  and  $.75  for  units  greater  than  1,000,000.


                                       22
<PAGE>
                          CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                          (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


The  second  software  license  agreement  granted  the  Company  the  rights to
incorporate  its  software  in  the  Company's  personal communication attendant
e-mail  device.  The  corporation  was  paid  $42,500  by  Concierge,  Inc. as a
non-refundable,  advance royalty payment. The agreement calls for the Company to
pay  a  royalty  of $1.10 for the first 100,000 units, thereafter $.85 per unit.

The  Company  amortizes the prepaid royalties by the amount which is the greater
of  the  amount computed using (a) the ratio that current gross revenues bear to
the  total  of  current  and  anticipated  future  gross  revenues  or  (b)  the
straight-line  method  over  the  remaining  estimated  economic  life.  Per the
guideline  under  SFAS  86  "Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to Be
Sold,  Leased, or Otherwise Marketed", amortization shall start when the product
is  available  for  general  release  to  customers.

The  term of licenses is five years from the date the Company begins shipping of
its  product.  The  prepaid  royalties  will be amortized based on straight-line
method  over  five-year  period  from  the  date  shipping  begins.

6.     NOTES  PAYABLE  -  RELATED  PARTIES

Current:

The  Company  has  notes payable amounting $290,208 payable to shareholders. The
notes  are  non-interest  bearing,  unsecured  and  due  on  demand.

Long  term  -  Payable  in  the  fiscal  year  ended  June  30,  2005:

The  Company has a loan payable to shareholder amounting $5,000 which was due on
September  30,  2002.  The  due date for this loan was extended to July 31, 2004
with same interest rate of 10% per annum. The Company also has a loan payable to
shareholder  amounting  $8,000  which was due on February 15, 2003 with interest
rate  of  10%  per annum.  The due date for this loan was extended to October 1,
2004,  with  same  interest rate. Also, there are two loans payable to a related
party, related by common shareholder, $10,000 which was due on February 15, 2003
and  another  $10,000 which was due on April 15, 2003, with interest rate of 10%
per annum on both loans. These loans were extended to October 1, 2004, with same
interest  rate.  In  addition,  the  Company  has  a loan payable to shareholder
amounting  $3,500  due  on September 1, 2004 with interest rate of 8% per annum.

7.     INCOME  TAXES

No  provision  was made for Federal income tax since the Company has significant
net  operating  loss carryforwards.  Through June 30, 2003, the Company incurred
net  operating losses for tax purposes of approximately $2,527,000.  Differences
between  financial  statement  and  tax losses consist primarily of amortization
allowance, was immaterial at June 30, 2003. The net operating loss carryforwards
may  be used to reduce taxable income through the year 2023.  Net operating loss
for  carryforwards  for the State of California is generally available to reduce
taxable  income  through  the  year  2008. The availability of the Company's net
operating loss carryforwards are subject to limitation if there is a 50% or more
positive  change  in  the  ownership  of  the Company's stock. The provision for
income  taxes  consists  of  the  state  minimum  tax  imposed  on corporations.

The  net deferred tax asset balance, due to net operating loss carryforwards, as
of  June  30,  2003  and  2002  were  approximately  $1,011,000  and  $992,000,
respectively.  A  100%  valuation  allowance  has  been  established against the
deferred  tax  assets,  as  the  utilization  of  the loss carrytforwards cannot
reasonably  be  assured.

                                       23
<PAGE>
                          CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                          (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


8.     SHARES  OF  CONCIERGE,  INC.  ISSUED  SUBJECT  TO  CONTINGENCY

Concierge,  Inc.  (CI)  issued  117,184  shares  for  cash totaling $202,061 and
354,870 shares for services of $3,549 during the year ended June 30, 2000. Since
December  1998, CI sold securities to persons in six states in the U. S.  CI did
not  file  Form D or other filings in any of the states or with the SEC for such
shares and did not properly follow the requirements for complying with available
exemptions  in  each  state.  Accordingly,  all  such  shares are subject to the
contingency  or  rescission  that  they  may  have  been  issued  without  the
availability  of an exemption from registration under the Securities Act of 1933
and  under  the  securities  laws  of each of the six states.  Therefore, CI has
treated  all  such  shares  issued  since  December 1998, as Common stock issued
subject  to  contingency/rescission.  Total shares issued subject to contingency
through  June  30,  2003, were 680,504 for cash and services amounting $266,610.

9.     SUBSCRIPTIONS  RECEIVED  FOR  COMMON  STOCK  SUBJECT  TO  CONTINGENCY

Concierge, Inc. (CI) entered into subscription agreements to issue "post merger"
shares  in exchange for cash. Through December 31, 2000, CI had received advance
subscriptions for a gross amount of $1,255,500 before deducting associated costs
of $79,710, for 5,928,750 post merger shares. In the event the merger between CI
and  the  Company is not completed prior to November 31, 2000, the obligation of
the  Company  under this agreement may be satisfied by the issuance of shares in
the  Company  equivalent  on  a  pro-rata basis to the number of shares in "post
merger"  Corporation  that  are  subject  to  this  agreement.

As  mentioned  in  Note  11,  CI  merged with the Company on March 20, 2002. The
Company  filed  a  registration  statement  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  ("the  Commission")  on June 8, 2000 related to the proposed merger,
naming  CI  as  the  entity proposed to be merged into the Company. From July 1,
2000  through  September  15, 2000, CI received additionally $487,500 as advance
subscription  for  2,127,500  post  merger  shares in an offering intended to be
exempt  from  registration  pursuant  to  the  provisions of Section 4(2) of the
Securities  Act  of  1933 and of Regulation D, Rule 506 of the Commission. It is
possible,  but not certain, that the filing of the registration statement by the
Company  and  the  manner  in  which CI conducted the sale of the 2,127,500 post
merger  shares  of  common  stock  constituted  "general  advertising or general
solicitation" by CI. General advertising and general solicitation are activities
that are prohibited when conducted in connection with an offering intended to be
exempt from registration pursuant to the provisions of Regulation D, Rule 506 of
the  Commission.  CI  does  not  concede  that   there  was  no  exemption  from
registration   available   for   this   offering.    Nevertheless,  should   the
aforementioned  circumstances  have  constituted  general advertising or general
solicitation,  CI  would be denied the availability of Regulation D, Rule 506 as
an  exemption  from  the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933
when  it  sold  the  2,127,500  post merger shares of common stock after June 8,
2000.  Should no exemption from registration have been available with respect to
the  sale  of these shares, the persons who bought them would be entitled, under
the  Securities  Act  of  1933,  to  the return of their subscription amounts if
actions  to  recover such monies should be filed within one year after the sales
in  question.  Accordingly,  the  amounts  received by CI from the sale of these
shares  are  set  apart  from Stockholders' Equity as "Subscription received for
common  stock  subject  to  contingency" to indicate this contingency. The total
contingent liabilities related to such shares amounted to $1,929,900 ($2,009,610
less  cost  and  expenses  of  $79,710)  as  of  June  30,  2003.

10.     COMMON  STOCK

During the year ended June 30, 2003, the Company issued 500,000 shares of common
stock  for  $29,983  cash  received  in  the prior year and 3,275,472 shares for
services  valued  at  $153,947 received in the prior year. During the year ended
June  30,  2003,  73,017  shares,  which  were  issued in error, were cancelled.


                                       24
<PAGE>
                          CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                          (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


11.    FORFEITURE  OF  STOCK  SUBSCRIPTION

During the year ended June 30, 2003, the Company forfeited stock subscription of
$10,000  towards  an agreement entered into with an investor whereby the Company
would  issue  shares  upon receiving a full payment of $35,000.  The outstanding
balance  of  the  subscription  due  amounting  $25,000  was not received by the
Company,  therefore,  as  non-fulfillment  of investor's obligation, the Company
forfeited  amount  subscribed to date. The forfeited amount has been recorded as
an  addition  to  paid  in  capital  in  the  financial  statements.

12.    MERGER  AGREEMENT

On  January  26,  2000  the  Company  entered  into  an agreement of merger with
Concierge,  Inc.  (CI),  a  California  Corporation.  Under  the  agreement, the
outstanding  1,376,380  share  of  common  stock  of  the CI were converted into
96,957,713  common  stock  of  the  Company on the basis of 70.444 shares of the
Company  for each share outstanding of the CI. The 96,957,713 post merger shares
were  distributed  to the shareholders of CI on a pro-rata basis. For accounting
purposes,  the  transaction was treated as a recapitalization of the CI, with CI
as  the  accounting  acquirer  (reverse acquisition), and was accounted for in a
manner  similar  to  a  pooling of interests. The operations of the Company have
been  included  with those of the CI from the acquisition date.  The Company had
minimal  assets  before the merger and did not have significant operations prior
to  the  merger.  The  merger  was  subject  to approval by shareholders of both
companies  and Securities and Exchange Commission. The merger was consummated on
March  20,  2002.

13.    SUPPLEMENTAL  DISCLOSURE  OF  CASH  FLOWS

The  Company  prepares its statements of cash flows using the indirect method as
defined  under  the  Financial  Accounting  Standard  No.  95.

The  Company paid $0 and $800 for income tax in the year ended June 30, 2003 and
2002.  Total  amount  paid  for income taxes from September 20, 1996 (inception)
through  March  31,  2002  amounted  to $4,800. The Company paid $0 for interest
during  the periods ended June 30, 2003 and $158 for 2002. Total amount paid for
interest  from September 20, 1996 (inception) through June 30, 2003, amounted to
$4,385.

The  Cash  flow  statements  do  not  include  effect  of  merger  with  CI.

14.    COMMITMENT

The Company sub-leases office space in Los Angeles, California from Ardent, Ltd.
The  term  of  the lease is 26 months with monthly payments of $1,542. The lease
expired  on August 31, 2002. Rent was $3,084 and $18,504 for the year ended June
30,  2003  and  2002, respectively. The Company is currently co-located with the
president  of  the  Company  and  pays  no  rent.

15.    LITIGATIONS

Concierge,  Inc.  filed  a complaint against Emerald-Delaware, Inc. (ED), in the
superior  court  for  the  County of Contra Costa on March 9, 2001 for breach of
contract,  negligence, fraud etc in relation to development of its products PCA.
ED  filed  a cross complaint in the same court. The parties reached a settlement

                                       25
<PAGE>
                          CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                          (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


on  October  9,  2001,  whereby  ED  agreed  to  compensate  CI  by $50,000. The
settlement  amount was received during the year ended June 30, 2002 and has been
reflected  as  settlement  income  in  the statements of operations for the year
ended  June  30,  2002.

On  May  6,  2002,  a  default judgment was awarded to Brookside Investments Ltd
against, jointly and severally, Concierge, Inc, Allen E. Kahn, and The Whitehall
Companies  in the amount of $135,000 plus legal fees. The Company did not defend
against the complaint by Brookside, which alleged that Brookside was entitled to
a  refund of their investment as a result of a breach of contract. Brookside had
entered  into  a  subscription agreement with Concierge, Inc., which called for,
among  other  things,  the  pending  merger between Starfest and Concierge to be
completed within 180 days of the investment. The merger was not completed within
180  days and Brookside sought a refund of their investment, which Concierge was
unable  to  provide.  The Company has accrued the judgment amount of $135,000 as
litigation  settlement  in  the  accompanying  financial  statements.





























                                       26
<PAGE>

ITEM  8.     CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS  WITH  ACCOUNTANTS  ON  ACCOUNTING AND
             FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

     Not  applicable.

ITEM  9.     DIRECTORS,  EXECUTIVE  OFFICERS,  PROMOTERS  AND  CONTROL  PERSONS;
             COMPLIANCE  WITH  SECTION  16(a)  OF  THE  EXCHANGE  ACT

     Set  forth  below  are  the  names,  and  terms  of  office  of each of the
directors,  executive  officers  and  significant  employees  of  Concierge
Technologies  at  June  30, 2003 and a description of the business experience of
each.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        Office Held  Term of
       Person                        Offices               Since     Office
       ------                        -------            -----------  -------
<S>                         <C>                              <C>      <C>
David  W.  Neibert          President  and  Director         2002     2004
James  E.  Kirk             Secretary  and  Director         1996     2004
Samuel  Wu                  Director                         2002     2004
Allen  E.  Kahn             Chairman,  CEO,  Director        1996     2004
Patrick  Flaherty           Director                         2002     2004
</TABLE>

Allen  E.  Kahn:  Mr.  Kahn  entered the computer industry as a Systems Engineer
with  IBM  and  subsequently  held  a  series of technical, sales, marketing and
management  positions   with  other  multi-billion  dollar  corporations  before
becoming  President  and  CEO  of  two  companies  marketing data communications
hardware  and software. He has extensive experience in voice technology, optical
character  recognition,  data communications and other technical elements of the
PCA,  which  he  conceived.  Mr. Kahn is an honors graduate of the University of
Texas  at El Paso and pursued postgraduate studies in Business Administration at
UTEP  and  California  State  University,  Long  Beach.

David  W. Neibert:  Mr. Neibert has been the President of Concierge Technologies
since June 17, 2002. Prior to assuming the duties of President, Mr. Neibert was,
and  remains,  a  director  of Concierge Technologies since 1999. Mr. Neibert is
also  the  president  of  The  Wallen  Group,  a  general  partnership providing
consulting  services  to   wireless  communications  companies  and  other  high
technology  firms in development stages. Prior to founding The Wallen Group, Mr.
Neibert served as the president of Roamer One and Midland USA, and as a director
and  executive  vice  president of business development of their publicly traded
parent  company Intek Global Corporation. Intek Global Corporation manufactured,
sold  and  distributed  radio  products globally to the consumer, government and
commercial  markets  and  operated a nationwide land mobile radio network in the
U.S.  Intek  Global  Corporation  was  subsequently  acquired  by their majority
shareholder,  Securicor  plc  of Sutton Surrey, England. Mr. Neibert reported to
offices  located  in Los Angeles, Ca., Kansas City, Mo. New York City, N.Y., and
Sutton Surrey, England during his tenure with Intek Global Corporation from 1992
until  1997.

Patrick  Flaherty:  Mr. Flaherty has been in the technology related business for
over  30  years.  During the last five years, he has been president of Manhattan
Resources,  a  consulting  company  specializing  in  Network Communications and

                                       27
<PAGE>

Storage  Management.  In late 1999 he became Senior Vice President of Concierge,
Inc,  and served in this position until March of 2002.  Since April 2002, he has
resumed  his  consulting  business  and  was  elected  to the board of Concierge
Technologies,  Inc  in  September  of  2002.

James E. Kirk, Esq.: Mr. Kirk is Corporate Secretary and General Counsel and has
served  as  a  Director  of Concierge, Inc. since inception. He is a graduate of
Wichita  State  University  and  holds LLB and JD degrees from the law school of
Washburn University. Mr. Kirk is an attorney in private practice in Albuquerque,
New  Mexico.

Samuel  C.H. Wu:  With nearly 20 years of experience in engineering, banking and
finance;  Mr.  Wu  has played a pivotal role in developing and managing national
and  international  business  activity  relationships  for  organizations in the
public  and  private  sectors. He was a senior marketing/credit officer with the
Bank  of  America  -World Banking Division in Tokyo, London and Hong Kong before
founding  Woodsford  Shipping  &  Trading  Co.,  Ltd.  Under  Mr. Wu's guidance,
Woodsford has become a preeminent firm in the area's import/export and financial
markets.  He  has  been  actively involved in the affairs of Concierge since its
inception.  Mr.  Wu  is  fluent  in  English,  Japanese  and a number of Chinese
dialects.  He  is a graduate of the University of California, Berkeley, where he
received  his  BSEE  in  electronics  and computer sciences and MBA. He has also
taken  advanced  studies  in  manufacturing,  quality  assurance  and  community
medicine.

     There  are  no  family  relationships  between  the directors and officers.
There  are  no  significant  employees of Concierge who are not described above.

     Section  16(a)  Beneficial  Ownership  Reporting  Compliance
     ------------------------------------------------------------

     Based  solely  upon  a  review  of  Forms  3  and  4 and amendments thereto
furnished  to  the registrant during its most recent fiscal year and Forms 5 and
amendments  thereto  furnished to the registrant with respect to its most recent
fiscal  year,  and  a  review  of  any  written  representations received by the
registrant from the following person who were at any time a director, officer or
beneficial  owner  of more than ten percent of any class of equity securities of
the  registrant  registered pursuant to Section 12, one director, Allen E. Kahn,
failed  to  file  on a timely basis, as disclosed below, the reports required by
Section  16(a)  of  the Exchange Act during the most recent fiscal year or prior
fiscal  years.

     The  following  sets  forth, with regard to our fiscal year that ended June
30,  2003,  the  numbers  and  types  of  failures  of  Mr.  Kahn

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
    Person     No. of late reports  No. of Transactions not  No. of known failures to file a
                                       reported timely          required Form 4 or Form 5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                     <C>                    <C>                          <C>
Allen E. Kahn           2                      4                            0
</TABLE>


ITEM 10.     EXECUTIVE  COMPENSATION

     The  following information concerns the compensation of our chief executive

                                       28
<PAGE>

officer  for the last three completed fiscal years.  No other executive officers
or  individuals  received  total  annual salary and bonus that exceeded $100,000
during  the  last  three  completed  fiscal  years.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         Shares of
Name of Chief Executive Officer  Year  Cash Salary  Common Stock Awarded
<S>                              <C>       <C>               <C>
David Neibert                    2003      0                 0
Allen Kahn                       2003      0                 0
Michael Huemmer                  2003      0                 0
David Neibert                    2002      0                 0
Allen Kahn                       2002      0                 0
Michael Huemmer                  2002      0                 0
Michael Huemmer                  2001      0                 0
</TABLE>

     Other  than  as  stated  above,  no  cash  or  stock compensation, deferred
compensation  or  long-term  incentive plan awards were issued or granted to our
management  during or with respect to the period ended June 30, 2003.   Further,
no  member  of  management  has  been  granted  any option or stock appreciation
rights;  accordingly, no tables relating to such items have been included within
this  Item.

     There  are no employment contracts, compensatory plans or arrangements with
respect  to  any  director or executive officer which would in any way result in
payments  to  any  such  person because of his or her resignation, retirement or
other  termination  of  employment,  any  change  in control, or a change in the
person's  responsibilities  following  a  change  in  control.

Long-Term  Compensation

     We  have  no long-term compensation plans or employment agreements with any
of  our  officers  or  directors.

ITEM 11.     SECURITY  OWNERSHIP  OF  CERTAIN  BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

     The  table below sets forth the ownership, as of September 16, 2003 of each
individual  known  to  management  to  be the beneficial owner of more than five
percent  of  the  company's  common stock, by all directors, and named executive
officers,  individually  and  as  a  group.



                                       29
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
   Name  and  Address  of                              Amount      Percent of
      Beneficial  Owner                                Owned         Class
   ----------------------                              ------      ----------
<S>                                                  <C>              <C>
Allen  E.  Kahn                                      24,349,135       19.3%
7547 W. Manchester Ave., No. 325
Los  Angeles,  CA  90045

Samuel  C.H.  Wu                                     20,855,437       16.5%
1202  Tower  1,  Admiralty  Centre
18  Harcourt  Road
Hong  Kong,  China

Polly  Force  Co.,  Ltd.                             10,805,680 (1)    8.6%
1202  Tower  1,  Admiralty  Centre
18  Harcourt  Road
Hong  Kong,  China

East  Asia  Strategic  Holdings,  Ltd.                7,395,137        5.9%
1202  Tower  1,  Admiralty  Centre
18  Harcourt  Road
Hong  Kong,  China

F.  Patrick  Flaherty                                 4,727,485        3.7%
637  29th  Street
Manhattan  Beach,  CA  90266

James  E.  Kirk                                       3,883,291        3.1%
1401  Kirby,  N.E.
Albuquerque,  NM  87112

David  W.  Neibert                                      715,876         (2)
24028  Clarington  Drive
West  Hills,  CA  91304

Officers  and  Directors                             54,531,224       43.18%
  as  a  Group  (5  persons)
</TABLE>

(1)  Mr.  Samuel  C.  H.  Wu  is  the  beneficial  owner  of  these  shares  and
     1,620,852  shares  held  by  Link  Sense  through  his  presence  on  their
     respective Boards  of  Directors.
(2)  Less  than  one  percent.

     There are no agreements between or among any of the shareholders that would
restrict  the  issuance  of  shares  in  a manner that would cause any change in
control  of  the  company.  There  are no voting trusts, pooling arrangements or
similar agreements in the place between or among any of the shareholders, nor do
the  shareholders anticipate the implementation of such an agreement in the near
future.

ITEM 12.     CERTAIN  RELATIONSHIPS  AND  RELATED  TRANSACTIONS

     There  were  no  transactions  during  the  past  two  years,  or  proposed
transactions,  to which Concierge Technologies was or is to be a party, in which


                                       30
<PAGE>

any  director,  executive  officer,  nominee  for  election  as  a director, any
security holder named in Item 10 above and any immediate family member of any of
the  foregoing persons had or is to have a direct or indirect material interest.

ITEM  13.     EXHIBITS  AND  REPORTS  ON  FORM  8-K

(a)     Exhibits

     The  following  exhibits  are  filed  as  part  of  this  Form  10-KSB:

Exhibit                              Item
-------                              ----

      2         -     Stock  Purchase  Agreement  of   March  6,  2000   between
                      Starfest,  Inc.  and  MAS  Capital,  Inc.*

      3.1       -     Certificate of Amendment of  Articles of Incorporation  of
                      Starfest, Inc. and its earlier articles of incorporation.*

      3.2       -     Bylaws  of  Concierge, Inc.,  which  became  the Bylaws of
                      Concierge Technologies upon its merger with Starfest, Inc.
                      on March 20, 2002.*

      3.5       -     Articles  of  Merger of Starfest, Inc. and Concierge, Inc.
                      filed with the Secretary of State of Nevada  on  March  1,
                      2002.**

      3.6       -     Agreement   of   Merger   between   Starfest,  Inc.    and
                      Concierge,  Inc.  filed  with  the  Secretary  of State of
                      California on March 20, 2002.**

     10.1       -     Agreement   of   Merger   between   Starfest,  Inc.    and
                      Concierge,  Inc.*

     31         -     Certification  of  Chief Executive Officer  pursuant to 18
                      U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 302
                      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act  of  2002.

     31.1       -     Certification  of  Chief Financial Officer  pursuant to 18
                      U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 302
                      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act  of  2002.

     32         -     Certification  of  Chief Executive Officer  pursuant to 18
                      U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906
                      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act  of  2002.

     32.1       -     Certification  of  Chief Financial Officer pursuant  to 18
                      U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906
                      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act  of  2002.



                                       31
<PAGE>

     *Previously  filed with Form 8-K12G3 on March 10, 2000; Commission File No.
     000-29913,  incorporated  herein.

     **Previously  filed  with  Form  8-K  on April 2, 2002; Commission File No.
     000-29913,  incorporated herein.

(b)     Reports  on  Form  8-K

     None

Item 14.     Controls  and  Procedures

     Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.  We maintain controls and
procedures  designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in this
report  is  recorded, processed, accumulated and communicated to our management,
including  our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, to allow
timely decisions regarding the required disclosure.  Within the 90 days prior to
the  filing  date  of this report, our management, with the participation of our
chief  executive  officer and chief financial officer, carried out an evaluation
of  the  effectiveness  of the design and operation of these disclosure controls
and  procedures.  Our  chief  executive  officer  and  chief  financial  officer
concluded,  as  of  fifteen  days  prior to the filing date of this report, that
these  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  are  effective.

     Changes  in  internal  controls.  Subsequent  to  the  date  of  the  above
evaluation,  we made no significant changes in our internal controls or in other
factors  that  could  significantly  affect  these controls, nor did we take any
corrective  action,  as  the  evaluation revealed no significant deficiencies or
material  weaknesses.
















                                       32

<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

     In  accordance  with  Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto  duly  authorized.

                                   CONCIERGE  TECHNOLOGIES,  INC.


                                   By/s/  David  W.  Neibert
Date:  October  __,  2003          ---------------------------------------------
                                   David  W.  Neibert,  President

     In  accordance  with  the  Exchange Act, this report has been signed by the
following  persons  on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates  indicated.



                                   /s/David  W.  Neibert
Date:  October  __,  2003          ---------------------------------------------
                                   David  W.  Neibert,  President  and  Director


                                   /s/Allen  E.  Kahn
Date:  October  __,  2003          ---------------------------------------------
                                   Allen E. Kahn,  Chief Financial  Officer  and
                                     Director


                                   /s/F.P.  Flaherty
Date:  October  __,  2003          ---------------------------------------------
                                   F.  Patrick  Flaherty,  Director


                                   /s/James E. Kirk
Date:  October  __,  2003          ---------------------------------------------
                                   James  E.  Kirk,  Secretary  and  Director


                                   /s/Samuel  C.H.  Wu
Date:  October  __,  2003          ---------------------------------------------
                                   Samuel  C.H.  Wu,  Director








                                       33

<PAGE>

                          CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                          Commission File No. 000-29913


                    Index to Exhibits to Form 10-KSB 06-30-03

The following exhibits are filed, by incorporation by reference, as part of this
Form  10-KSB:

Exhibit                              Item
-------                              ----

      2         -     Stock  Purchase  Agreement  of   March  6,  2000   between
                      Starfest,  Inc.  and  MAS  Capital,  Inc.*

      3.1       -     Certificate of Amendment of  Articles of Incorporation  of
                      Starfest, Inc. and its earlier articles of incorporation.*

      3.2       -     Bylaws  of  Concierge, Inc.,  which  became  the Bylaws of
                      Concierge Technologies upon its merger with Starfest, Inc.
                      on March 20, 2002.*

      3.5       -     Articles  of  Merger of Starfest, Inc. and Concierge, Inc.
                      filed with the Secretary of State of Nevada  on  March  1,
                      2002.**

      3.6       -     Agreement   of   Merger   between   Starfest,  Inc.    and
                      Concierge,  Inc.  filed  with  the  Secretary  of State of
                      California on March 20, 2002.**

     10.1       -     Agreement   of   Merger   between   Starfest,  Inc.    and
                      Concierge,  Inc.*

     31         -     Certification  of  Chief Executive Officer  pursuant to 18
                      U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 302
                      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act  of  2002.

     31.1       -     Certification  of  Chief Financial Officer  pursuant to 18
                      U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 302
                      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act  of  2002.

     32         -     Certification  of  Chief Executive Officer  pursuant to 18
                      U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906
                      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act  of  2002.


                                        1
<PAGE>

     32.1       -     Certification  of  Chief Financial Officer pursuant  to 18
                      U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906
                      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act  of  2002.

     *Previously  filed with Form 8-K12G3 on March 10, 2000; Commission File No.
     000-29913,  incorporated  herein.

     **Previously  filed  with  Form  8-K  on April 2, 2002; Commission File No.
     000-29913,  incorporated herein.





































                                        2