alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Housing Finance Board

# Time and Date:

The open meeting of the Board of Directors is scheduled to begin at 10 a.m. on Wednesday, August 9, 2006. The closed portion of the meeting will follow immediately the open portion of the meeting. 

# Place:

Board Room, First Floor, Federal Housing Finance Board, 1625 Eye Street,  NW., Washington, DC 20006. 

# Status:

The first portion of the meeting will be open to the public. The final portion of the meeting will be closed to the public. 

# Matters to be Considered at the Open Portion:

*Data Reporting Requirements: Affordable Housing Program.*

*Proposed Bank Examination Rating System.*

# Matter to be Considered at the Closed Portion:

*Periodic Update of Examination Program Development and Supervisory Findings.*

# Contact Person for More Information: 

                        Shelia Willis, Paralegal Specialist, Office of General Counsel, at 202-408-2876 or                         *williss@fhfb.gov.*

Dated: August 2, 2006.

By the Federal Housing Finance Board. 

John P. Kennedy, 

General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 06-6748 Filed 8-3-06; 9:33 am] 

BILLING CODE 6725-01-P
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 1624** 

LAUNEIL SANDERS , Plaintiff

- Appell ant ,
v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Administrator Lisa Jackson; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & ENVIRON MENTAL CONTROL; ABITIBI BOWATER CORPORATION; INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Spartanburg
. R. Bryan Harwell , District Judge. ( 7:10

- cv - 00968

- RB H )

Submitted : September 28, 2010 Decided: September 30, 2010

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Launeil Sanders, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent i n this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Launeil Sanders appeals the district court ’ s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complain without prejudice . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. Sanders v. United States , No. 7:10

- cv - 00968

- RBH (D.S.C. June 1, 2010) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
791 A.2d 217

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM F. SEVERINO, DEFENDANT-MOVANT.

January 10, 2002.

ORDER

Leave to appeal is granted;

ORDERED that the matter is summarily remanded to the Superior Court, Law Division, which shall reconsider movant’s application in respect of Summons SPV 152443 as a motion to vacate any fines and/or charges resulting from defendant’s failure to appear in Elizabeth Municipal Court.
§ 54.1812 Validity of electronic signatures. ( a ) For the purposes of this subpart, an electronic signature, defined by the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act, as an electronic sound, symbol, or process, attached to or logically associated with a contract or other record and executed or adopted by a person with the intent to sign the record, has the same legal effect as a written signature.
( b ) For the purposes of this subpart, an electronic record, defined by the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act as a contract or other record created, generated, sent, communicated, received, or stored by electronic means, constitutes a record.
No. 11-7928.

#### Bridges *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 155 (Friday, August 11, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 46239]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6770]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5045-N-32]


Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless.

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 11, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, Room 7252, 451 Seventh Street SW., Washington, 
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and 
speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-
free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-
7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus 
Federal building and real property that HUD has reviewed for 
suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the 
purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been 
determined suitable or unsuitable this week.

    Dated: August 3, 2006.
Mark R. Johnston,
Acting Deputy Assistant, Secretary for Special Needs.
[FR Doc. 06-6770 Filed 8-10-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-M
§ 54.628 Duplicate support. ( a ) Eligible health care providers that seek support under the Healthcare Connect Fund Program for telecommunications services may not also request support from the Telecommunications Program for the same services.
( b ) Eligible health care providers that seek support under the Telecommunications Program or the Healthcare Connect Fund Program may not also request support from any other universal service program for the same expenses.
No. 11-5546.

#### Greenwood *v.*Massachusetts.

App. Ct. Mass. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-5476.

#### Johnson *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# Welcome to Senior Service College and CIO LDP Students

/ Published Aug. 10, 2016

The iCollege is pleased to welcome the 2016-17 academic year Senior Service College (JPME II) students and the CIO Leadership Development cohort.  

On Monday, August 8, the 10-month SSC/JPME program began semester classes with a diverse group of military and civilian students. The NDU iCollege provides a Joint Professional Military Education (JPME) Phase II curriculum that produces national security leaders and advisors who develop the strategies and the  necessary doctrine to successfully leverage information and cyberspace operations within the broader national security framework. The college's JPME curriculum focuses on the information/cyberspace instrument of national security. It provides graduate-level education to senior military and civilian leaders with an emphasis on the military, government, and private sector dimensions of information/cyberspace as a critical component of national security strategy. The iCollege program concentrates on developing the habits of mind, conceptual foundations, and cognitive faculties graduates will need at their highest level of strategic responsibility. Students will graduate with a Master's Degree in June 2017. More information can be found at: http://icollege.ndu.edu/Academics/Graduate-Programs/JPME-Pilot/ . 

On Wednesday, August 10, the Chief Information Officer Leadership Development Program (CIO LDP), formerly the Advanced Management Program (AMP) began, welcoming a group of DoD and other Federal Government employees, and five international officers from Romania, Czech Republic, Bulgaria, Oman, and Ukraine. The CIO LDP is a multi-week, resident program where students discuss CIO competencies, teambuilding skills, leadership roles, and lessons from domestic field studies, while completing the Chief Information Officer Certificate Program. The CIO LDP is the iCollege’s flagship resident program for rising senior-level managers and leaders responsible for promoting and attaining national and international security goals through the strategic use of information and information technology. More information can be found on the Academics page of the college's website at: http://icollege.ndu.edu/Academics/Graduate-Programs/CIO-Leadership-Development-Program/. 

For more information or answers to questions, please contact the iCollege Office of Student Services at iCollegeOSS@ndu.edu or 202-685-6300.
186P10-3

#### State v. David Felton

1. Defs *Pro Se*Motion for Notice of Appeal

1. Dismissed *ex mero motu*

2. Defs-Pro *Se*Motion to Proceed *In Forma Pauperis*

2. Allowed

3. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion to Appoint Counsel

3. Dismissed as moot
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"23-1281: ALCON INC. v. AMO DEVELOPMENT, LLC [ORDER], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"GGLZjllmop\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/03-27-2023-23-1281-alcon-inc-v-amo-development-llc-order-23-1281-order-3-27-2023_2100467\/\">23-1281: ALCON INC. v. AMO DEVELOPMENT, LLC [ORDER], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/03-27-2023-23-1281-alcon-inc-v-amo-development-llc-order-23-1281-order-3-27-2023_2100467\/embed\/#?secret=GGLZjllmop\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“23-1281: ALCON INC. v. AMO DEVELOPMENT, LLC [ORDER], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"GGLZjllmop\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"ORDER Posted: ALCON INC. v. AMO DEVELOPMENT, LLC [ORDER](pdf) Appeal Number: 23-1281 Origin: PTO Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
#### Ruben PEREZ, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, Respondent.

No. 04-3065.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 8, 2004.

ON MOTION

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of Ruben Perez’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss his petition for review,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

> (1) The motion is granted.

> (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Curtis J. Parker, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge, Cotelligent, Inc.s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cotelligent, Inc.



|                     |  |     |  |                                                     
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 29, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ Curtis J. Parker                                
|                     |  |     |  | Curtis J. Parker                                    
|                     |  |     |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
NOTE

|U.S. $50,000,000 |  | Dublin
November 1, 2001
|---------------- |  | -----------------------



FOR VALUE RECEIVED, E-LOAN, INC., a corporation organized and
existing under the laws of Delaware (the "Borrower"), hereby promises to pay to
the order of GMAC BANK, a federal savings bank (the "Lender"), in lawful money
of the United States of America in immediately available funds on the Expiry
Date (as defined in the Warehouse Credit Agreement) the principal sum of FIFTY
MILLION United States Dollars ($50,000,000), or, if less, the aggregate unpaid
principal amount of all Advances (as defined in the Warehouse Credit Agreement)
made by the Lender to the Borrower pursuant to the Warehouse Credit
Agreement.

The Borrower promises also to pay interest on the unpaid
principal amount of each Advance from the date such Advance is made until paid
in full, at the interest rates, and at the times, as specified in the Warehouse
Credit Agreement.

This Note is the Note referred to in the Warehouse Credit
Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2001, as may be amended from time to time
(the "Warehouse Credit Agreement"), between the Borrower and the Lender. This
Note is secured by the Warehouse Security Agreement.

This Note is subject to mandatory prepayment as provided in
Section 4.02 of the Warehouse Credit Agreement and, in case an Event of Default
(as defined in the Warehouse Credit Agreement) shall occur and be continuing,
the principal of and accrued interest on this Note may be declared to be due and
payable in the manner and with the effect provided in the Warehouse Credit
Agreement.

The Borrower hereby waives diligence, presentment, protest,
demand or notice of every kind in connection with this Note.

THIS NOTE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE LAW OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, WITHOUT REGARD TO PRINCIPLES OF CONFLICTS
OF LAWS.

E-LOAN, INC.



By:_______________________________

Name:_____________________________

Title:____________________________

---
#### § 32.1 Background.

The revised Uniform System of Accounts (USOA) is a historical financial accounting system which reports the results of operational and financial events in a manner which enables both management and regulators to assess these results within a specified accounting period. The USOA also provides the financial community and others with financial performance results. In order for an accounting system to fulfill these purposes, it must exhibit consistency and stability in financial reporting (including the results published for regulatory purposes). Accordingly, the USOA has been designed to reflect stable, recurring financial data based to the extent regulatory considerations permit upon the consistency of the well-established body of accounting theories and principles commonly referred to as generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The rules of this part, and any other rules or orders that are derivative of or dependent on the rules in this part, do not apply to price cap companies, and rate-of-return telephone companies offering business data services pursuant to § 61.50 of this chapter, that have opted-out of USOA requirements pursuant to the conditions specified by the Commission in § 32.11(g).

[83 FR 67121, Dec. 28, 2018]
No. 11-5044.

#### Phelps *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
§ 27.1416 Reimbursable costs. ( a ) *Determining reimbursable costs.* The Relocation Payment Clearinghouse shall review reimbursement requests to determine whether they are reasonable and to ensure they comply with the requirements adopted in this sub-part. The Relocation Payment Clearinghouse shall give parties the opportunity to supplement any reimbursement claims that the Relocation Payment Clearinghouse deems deficient. Reimbursement submissions that fall within the estimated range of costs in the cost category schedule issued by the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau shall be presumed reasonable. If the Relocation Payment Clearinghouse determines that the amount sought for reimbursement is unreasonable, it shall notify the party of the amount it deems eligible for reimbursement. The Wireless Telecommunications Bureau shall make further determinations related to reimbursable costs, as necessary, throughout the transition process.
( b ) *Payment procedures.* Following a determination of the reimbursable amount, the Relocation Payment Clearinghouse shall incorporate approved claims into invoices, which it shall issue to each licensee indicating the amount to be paid. The Relocation Payment Clearinghouse shall pay approved claims within 30 days of invoice submission. The Relocation Payment Clearinghouse shall also include its own reasonable costs in the invoices.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

717 MADISON PLACE, N.W.

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20439

PETER R. MARKSTEINER

CLERK OF COURT

CLERK’S OFFICE

202-275-8000

February 25, 2021

Expanded Availability of Oral Argument Live Audio Streaming

As part of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s ongoing 

response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the court will begin offering a new live audio 

streaming program for select oral argument panels starting with the March 2021 

court session. Beginning in the March 2021 court session, one scheduled argument 

panel will have daily live streaming audio on the Federal Circuit’s new YouTube 

channel. Beginning in the April 2021 court session, the court anticipates that all 

oral arguments will be live audio streamed online while the courthouse remains 

closed to the public.

For the March 2021 session, Panels B, E, H, K, and N will only be available through 

the online audio stream. Live audio access for all other scheduled argument panels 

will continue through the existing telephonic conference process that has been in 

effect since April 2020.

Connection information for all panels is posted on the court’s website by 9:00 a.m. 

(Eastern) on the first day of the month’s session at:

http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/public-access-arguments. Recordings of all arguments 

continue to be available on the court's website after the conclusion of arguments 

each day.

Because of limited on-site staff availability, the Clerk’s Office will neither be able to 

provide technical assistance to anyone trying to access either live audio feed nor be 

able to provide access information either ahead of time or beyond what is posted on 

the court’s website.

Please direct all media and press inquiries to the Clerk’s Office at 

chiefdeputyclerk@cafc.uscourts.gov.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Jeffery Eng, President and Chief Executive Officer of TotalMed, Inc. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.  This Quarterly Report on 10QSB of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  May 22, 2006



/s/ Jeffery Eng

_______________________



Jeffery Eng

President and Chief Executive Officer
CHICAQO OFFIC E 

ZO KORTH WACKCR DRIVE 

CHiCAao. iLLiNoia aoao * 

Oia ) ssca^o s 

^Ax (3iz > 33a-eaa 7 

NEW JERSEY OFFIC E 

I lO SUMMIT AVENUE 

HONTVALE. NEW JERSEY OTa^ a 

(lOI) «7«'a4O 0 

TAX (eo n BT3-as7 H 

RICHARD A". AUERBAC H 

UEONARD D. KIRSCH 

ROBERT S. MDRAN. JR. 

NORMAN N. 8LUTH 

MAROARET SIUQLIANO 

KENNETH A. RCYNOLDS 

RESIDENT PARTNERS IN NEW YORK 

MCBREE N & KoPKo 

ATTORNEY S AT LAW 

B O O NORT H BROADWAY, SUIT E 18 9 

JERICHO , NEW YORK II7S 3 

(SIS ) 3«<i.l09 B 

FAX (SIS ) ae^-oei a 

ganaralOmklawnyc.com 

October 30,2010 

NEW YORK CITY OFFIC E 

4 « « BEVENTH AVENUE 

17T H FLOO R 

N EW YORK. HEW YORK lOOIS 

<ai>) saa-aaao 

CALIFORNIA OFFICE 

aaO l IRVIHE CENTER DRIVE 

SUITE lo o 

IRVINE. CALIFORNIA aCai S 

IS4» ) «B3-a»O 0 

FAX (•.4a> Hsa-saa a 

PHILADELPHIA OFFIC E 

lao o MARKET STREET 

SUITE laOB 

PHILADELPHIA. PENNSYLVANIA I • I 0 3 

<zis ) aa«-aao o 

FAX (eiB i sa<»-zei o 

/(c-ZD-dS^ 

Office of Chief Counsel 

Attention: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket, AGC-610 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue SW 

Washington D.C. 20591 

Attention: Beth Newman 

Re^Part 16 Mercuxy Air Center-Corpus Christi, inc., d^/a Atlantic Aviation v/ City of Corpus 

Gentlemen: 

Enclosed is the Certification of Service in the above referenced matter. 

Very truly yours, 

Leonard Kirsch 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

In re the Complaint of 

MERCURY AIR CENTER-CORPUS CHRISTI, INC., 

d^/a ATLANTIC AVIATION 

355 Pinson Drive, Corpus Christi, TX 78406 

COMPLAINANT, 

-againstCITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI 

RESPONDENT. 

Pijrsuant to Part 16 of the Federal 

Aviation Regulations 

I hereby certify that on October 15,2010,1 served the foregoing Part 16 Complaint on the 

following person at the following addresses by bringing the Complaint to Federal Express, 

overnight service. 

Elizabeth Hundley, Esq. 

City of Corpus Christi 

1201 Leopard St. 

Corpus Christi, TX 78401, 

Corpus Christi International Airport 

1000 International Drive 

Corpus Christi, TX 78406. 

Dated: Jericho, New York 

October 15,2010 "X^^ ^ 0^ ic^>. ^ 

Leonard D. Kirsch, Esq. 

McBreen & Kopko 

Attorneys for COMPLAINANT 

Mercury Air Center-Corpus Christi, Inc., 

D/B/A Atlantic Aviation 

500 North Broadway 

Jericho, New York 11753 

(516)364-1095 

(516) 364-0612