alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      Richard Hersh, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
      of
      Power2Ship, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in such Quarterly Report on
      Form
      10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
      results of operations of Power2Ship, Inc.





**POWER2SHIP,
      INC.**








/s/
      Richard Hersh


Richard
      Hersh


Chief
      Executive Officer and


Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer





February
      21, 2006
1225 19th Street NW Suite 450, Washington DC 20036 (202) 869-5210 www.NCLAlegal.org

August 14, 2023

The Honorable the Members of the Special Committee of the 

Judicial Council for the Federal Circuit

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

717 Madison Place, N.W.

Washington, DC 20439

VIA EMAIL

Re: In re Complaint No. 23-90015 (Complaint Against Circuit Judge Pauline Newman)

Your Honors:

We are in receipt of the Special Committee’s Report and Recommendation which was filed on 

July 31, 2023. The report relies heavily on the data provided by the Office of the Clerk of the Court 

and also rejects and/or discounts statistical analysis conducted by Dr. Ron Katnznelson. See Report 

at 58, n. 20. 

In preparing Judge Newman’s response to the Special Committee’s Report and 

Recommendation, which is currently due on August 31, 2023, we need to conduct our own analysis 

of the data relied on by the Special Committee, as well as analyze whether such reliance is appropriate 

in the first place. To that end, we respectfully request that the Committee release to us, under seal, 

the data not only from 2020 on, but from 2018 to 2020. Specifically, we request data for the 

aforementioned time period regarding per curiam authorships, opinion reassignments, delays, and all 

similar types of data which was provided to the Committee by the Office of the Clerk of the Court 

for the 2020-present time period. See Report at 50-59. 

Furthermore, we request access to the data which has not been publicly released for our 

consulting expert which in turn would permit us to conduct a proper analysis. Of course, it goes 

without saying that our expert would be bound by the same requirements of confidentiality as are the 

attorneys, paralegals, and other staff at the New Civil Liberties Alliance.
2 | N C L A

In light of the fast-approaching deadline to file a response to the Special Committee’s Report 

and Recommendation, we respectfully request an expedited decision on this matter.1 

 

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Gregory Dolin,M.D.

Senior Litigation Counsel

NEW CIVIL LIBERTIES ALLIANCE

1 Pursuant Rule 23(b)(7), Judge Newman consents (subject to necessary redactions) to the public 

release of the present letter and any Order or other communication issued in response thereto.
# Euroopan unionin C 176A/2013

| | ISSN 1977-1053
  doi:10.3000/19771053.CA2013.176.fin |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopan unionin
  virallinen lehti | C 176A |
| | |
| Suomenkielinen laitos | Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia | 56. vuosikerta21. kesäkuu 2013 |

ISSN 1977-1053

doi:10.3000/19771053.CA2013.176.fin

Euroopan unionin

virallinen lehti

C 176A

Suomenkielinen laitos

Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia

56. vuosikerta21. kesäkuu 2013

---

| Ilmoitusnumero | Sisältö | Sivu |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Oikaisuja |
| 2013/C 176A/01 | Oikaisu ilmoitukseen avoimesta kilpailusta EPSO/AD/249/13 (EUVL C 75 A, 14.3.2013) | 1 |

Ilmoitusnumero

Sisältö

Sivu

Oikaisuja

2013/C 176A/01

Oikaisu ilmoitukseen avoimesta kilpailusta EPSO/AD/249/13 (EUVL C 75 A, 14.3.2013)

(EUVL C 75 A, 14.3.2013)

1

Luettelo EUVL:n C A -sarjassa julkaistuista kilpailuista

Jäljempänä luettelo kuluvana vuonna julkaistuista C A -lehdistä.

Mikäli toisin ei mainita, EUVL on julkaistu kaikkina kieliversioina.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 27 | (RO) |
| 29 | |
| 33 | |
| 34 | |
| 36 | (DA) |
| 41 | (BG) |
| 43 | (EN) |
| 49 | (ET) |
| 50 | (HU) |
| 51 | (SL) |
| 54 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 58 | (EN/GA) |
| 75 | |
| 81 | |
| 82 | |
| 88 | (BG) |
| 89 | (CS) |
| 94 | |
| 104 | |
| 109 | |
| 111 | |
| 112 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 117 | (ET) |
| 118 | |
| 120 | |
| 131 | |
| 143 | |
| 160 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 162 | |
| 166 | |
| 167 | |
| 168 | |
| 172 | |
| 173 | |
| 174 | |
| 176 | (BG/DE/EN/ET/FI/IT/LT/LV/MT/NL/PL/PT/SK/SL/SV) |

5

27

(RO)

29

33

34

36

(DA)

41

(BG)

43

(EN)

49

(ET)

50

(HU)

51

(SL)

54

(DE/EN/FR)

58

(EN/GA)

75

81

82

88

(BG)

89

(CS)

94

104

109

111

112

(DE/EN/FR)

117

(ET)

118

120

131

143

160

(DE/EN/FR)

162

166

167

168

172

173

174

176

(BG/DE/EN/ET/FI/IT/LT/LV/MT/NL/PL/PT/SK/SL/SV)

| FI | |
| --- | --- |

FI

---

Oikaisuja

| 21.6.2013 | FI | Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti | CA 176/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2013

FI

Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti

CA 176/1

---

Oikaisu ilmoitukseen avoimesta kilpailusta EPSO/AD/249/13

(
  Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti C 75 A, 14. maaliskuuta 2013
  )

(2013/C 176 A/01)

Sivulla 6, VI osan 2 kohdan d alakohdassa:

on:

| ”d) | strukturoitu haastattelu, jossa käsitellään hakijan kompetensseja valitulla alalla niiden vastausten pohjalta, jotka hakija on antanut hakemuksen osiossa ”kykyjen kartoitus” (talent screener)” |
| --- | --- |

”d)

strukturoitu haastattelu, jossa käsitellään hakijan kompetensseja valitulla alalla niiden vastausten pohjalta, jotka hakija on antanut hakemuksen osiossa ”kykyjen kartoitus” (talent screener)”

pitää olla:

| ”d) | strukturoitu haastattelu, jossa käsitellään hakijan kompetensseja valitulla alalla ja niiden vastausten pohjalta, jotka hakija on antanut hakemuksen osiossa ”kykyjen kartoitus” (talent screener)” |
| --- | --- |

”d)

strukturoitu haastattelu, jossa käsitellään hakijan kompetensseja valitulla alalla ja niiden vastausten pohjalta, jotka hakija on antanut hakemuksen osiossa ”kykyjen kartoitus” (talent screener)”

---
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority (the Authority), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, on the date hereof:

(a) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Authority for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006 filed on the date hereof with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Authority.



/s/    MITCHELL GROSSINGER
ETESSMitchell Grossinger Etess Chief Executive Officer, Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority December 21,
2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to the Authority and will be retained by the Authority and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT K. HUDNALL.

(Supreme Court Disciplinary Nos. 586, 595, 596, 597, 600, 601, 611, 612, 613, 614)

(379 SE2d 517)

Decided May 25, 1989.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, Paul B. Cohen, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

Per curiam.

Respondent Robert K. Hudnall has petitioned for voluntary surrender of his license to practice law in the State of Georgia. Respondent Hudnall has admitted violations of multiple standards described in State Bar Rule 4-102. In view of the Review Panel’s recommendation that the surrender of his license be accepted, it is directed that he be allowed to surrender it. Voluntary surrender of a license is tantamount to disbarment. Consequently, respondent must comply with reinstatement procedures of the State Bar of Georgia in effect at the time of any reinstatement petition before reinstatement will be considered.

Application for voluntary surrender of license is granted.

*All the Justices concur.*
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2011-0028

Directorate Identifier: 2009NM228AD

737-28A1212 IN 01 --- 10/7/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
[Crim. No. 1699.

Third Appellate District.

November 17, 1939.]

#### THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. A. J. TINDALL, Appellant.

A. J. Tindall, *in pro. per.,*and Horace F. Frye for Appellant.

Earl Warren, Attorney-General, and J. Q. Brown, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.

TUTTLE, J. —

Appellant pleaded guilty to the crime of burglary, which the court found to be of the second degree. He also pleaded guilty to three other felonies, and on January 26, 1939, was sentenced under the Habitual Criminal Law. (Pen. Code, sec. 644.) On July 14, 1939, he moved the court to modify the judgment of conviction to the extent of striking out that portion thereof which adjudges him to be an habitual criminal. The motion was denied, and the appeal is taken from the order of denial. The attorney-general now moves to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

The contention made by appellant is that the information charges him with the commission of two prior crimes which are denominated as “larceny”, and there is nothing to show whether the crime is a felony or a misdemeanor. It appears, however, that he was charged with the *508“crime of larceny, a felony”, and it is further alleged in the information that he served a term therefor in the state prison in each instance. It would seem that this charges a felony, as “a felony is a crime which is punishable with death or by imprisonment in a State Prison”. (See. 17, Pen. Code.)

Taking up the motion to dismiss the appeal, the case of *People*v. *Carkeek,*decided this day by this court *(ante,*p. 499 [96 Pac. (2d) 132]), fully disposes of all the contentions made here, and upon authority of that ease it is ordered that the appeal be dismissed.

Thompson, J., and Pullen, P. J., concurred.
Form 22 

Rev. 03/16

FORM 22. Transcript Purchase Order

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 

) Appeal from U.S. District Court for 

Court of International Trade

Court of Federal Claims -VERSUS- 

) Trial Court No. 

) Circuit Court No. 

TRANSCRIPT PURCHASE ORDER 

(See Rules 10(b) and 11(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure) 

PART I - TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPELLANT WITHIN 14 DAYS OF FILING OF NOTICE OF APPEAL. 

 When filing this form, distribute copies as follows: 3 copies to the court reporter; 1 copy to 

 the trial court; 1 copy to the appellee; 1 copy retained by appellant. 

 

 A. Complete one of the following: 

A transcript is not needed for the appeal

A transcript is already on file

Request is hereby made to the reporter for a transcript of the following proceedings (give particulars):

Note: voir dire and closing arguments are not prepared unless specifically requested. 

Note: Unless the entire transcript is ordered, appellant must attach a statement of the issues to Copies 4 and 5.

B. I certify that financial arrangements have been made with the reporter. Payment is by: 

Private Funds

Government expense (civil case). A motion for transcript has been submitted to the trial judge.

SIGNED DATE COUNSEL FOR

ADDRESS

TELEPHONE

PART II - TO BE COMPLETED BY THE COURT REPORTER 

 2 copies retained by the reporter; 1 copy to be transmitted to the Court of Appeals on same date transcript order is 

 received.

 Date Purchase Order received: 

 Estimated completion date: 

 Estimated number of pages: 

I certify that satisfactory financial arrangements have/have not (strike one) been completed with appellant for payment of 

the cost of the transcript.

Signature and Date

PART III - NOTIFICATION THAT TRANSCRIPT HAS BEEN FILED IN THE TRIAL COURT. 

 ( To be completed by court reporter on date of filing transcript in Trial Court and this notification must be forwarded 

 to the Court of Appeals on the same date.)

This is to certify that the transcript has been completed. volumes of transcript have been filed with Trial 

Court today.

Signature and Date

Telephone
69–008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 106–6

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 350, MANDATES

INFORMATION ACT OF 1999

FEBRUARY 3, 1999.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. LINDER, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 36]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 36, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 350, the Mandates Information Act of 1999, under an open rule providing one

hour of general debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Rules. The

rule waives points of order against consideration of the bill for failure to comply with clause 4(a) of rule XIII (requiring a three day

layover of the committee report) and section 306 of the Congressional Budget Act (prohibiting consideration of legislation within

the Budget Committee’s jurisdiction, unless reported by the Budget

Committee).

The rule considers the amendment in the nature of a substitute

recommended by the Committee on Rules, now printed in the bill,

as an original bill for the purpose of amendment which is considered as read. The rule also waives points of order against the

amendment in the nature of a substitute for failure to comply with

section 306 of the Congressional Budget Act.

The rule further allows the chairman of the Committee of the

Whole to accord priority in recognition to those members who have

preprinted their amendments in the Congressional Record prior to

their consideration. The rule also allows the chairman of the Committee of the Whole to postpone recorded votes and to reduce to

five minutes the voting time on any postponed question, provided

voting time on the first in any series of questions is not less than
2

fifteen minutes. Finally, the rule provides one motion to recommit,

with or without instructions.

The waiver of clause 4(a) of rule XIII is necessary because the

report was filed Tuesday, February 2, and the bill is expected to

be considered on the House floor on Thursday, February 4. Consequently, the report will only be available for 1 day. The waiver

of section 306 of the Congressional Budget Act is necessary because

the bill and the amendment in the nature of a substitute both include amendments to the Budget Act which is a shared jurisdiction

between the Rules Committee and the Budget Committee. However, the bill was actually only referred to the Rules Committee.

Æ
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. David Fitzgerald LIGHTNER, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 03-7609.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 12, 2004.

Decided Feb. 20, 2004.

*679David Fitzgerald Lightner, Appellant pro se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

David Fitzgerald Lightner appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See United States v. Lightner,*No. CR-93-133 (W.D.N.C. July 10, 2003). We deny Light-ner’s motion to remand his case and grant his motion for judicial notice. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   I, Rowland Mosser, Chief Executive Officer of Veridigm, Inc.(the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  1.  This Quarterly Report on 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date:  August 20, 2007  By:/s/ Rowland Mosser ------------------------------- Rowland Mosser President, Chief Executive Officer, and acting Chief Financial Officer
Natoma

Manors

Bay

Heights

Golden Pines

North

Grove

Shorecrest

Bay Point

Miami International Airport

Morningside

Grapeland Heights

Little Havana Dodge Island

Shenandoah

Virginia Key

Auburndale

Liberty City

Silver Bluff

Wynwood

Little River

Downtown

The Roads

Allapattah

Little Haiti

Overtown

Flagami

Brickell

Omni

C

O

C

O

N

U

T

G

R

O

V

E

pU

ep Er sa St edi

r et a wegdE

D

3

Alt. M

a

p

v.2

Districts

12345

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 173-20 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024 Page 1 of 1
%KK*K%$"/K$K%($K-*K;K;K&&;K;K32;1


# United States Court of Appeals

%(K*K,$*K(+* %<K""$%)K60604

+#**K	+"/K20<K2018 G

K	+"/K30<K2018K



### %(

 

K ;   < 


K  K ;   < 


K  K ;  

;   < 


%;K17H2567K

 K  KK   <K 

<KK K 

;K

 
K  <K 

;K &&"K (%#K *K $*K
**)K )*(*K %+(*K %(K *K %(*($K )*(*K %K ""$%)<K
)*($K,)%$;K

%;K16KK2H1K (")K;K
%("<K 

;K




%$"K%-$K&"K+"*/K*%K*($)&%(*$K"K&%($%(&/<K 18K;;;K F2252>?>1?<K$K-)K)$*$K*%K15K/()CK#&()%$#$*;KK "$*K%K*K)$*$K &$)K%$K$K$$#$*K+$(K18K;;;KF2252>?>1?<K-K &&")K*%K$/K&()%$K -%K)KK%$,*%$KD+$(K*K"-)K%K$/K**K("*$K*%K (,*K).+"K+)<K ).+"K+)<K%(K+),K).+"K%$+*K$,%",$KK#$%(K%(K- (<K%(K*K&(%+*%$<KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK

G K*(K.#$$K *K()K$K *K(%(<K-K,K%$"+K * *K%("K (+#$*K)K+$$))(/;K K;K;K&&;K;K34>?>2?>?;K%;K17H2567K K2K

&%))))%$<K(&*<K#"$<K)"<K)*(+*%$<K)&#$*<K%(K *($)&%(**%$K%K"K&%(H $%(&/<K%(K).K*(!$K%K"($E;K+)*%$K>?>1?K&( %,)K%(KK#$#+#K *(#K%K15K/()K$KK#.#+#K%K40=K-*%+*K*K$$#$*K* K)**+*%(/K($K%(K%-$K-%+"K,K$K5K*%K20K/();KK*(#K%K15K/()K)K-* $K%*K($)<K+*K/K $$K*K$$#$*K&&""K*K)*(*K%+(*K$K *)K)(*%$;K>K +K K$%*K)/K+$'+,%""/K**KK-%+"K,K#&%)KK15H/(K )$*$K-*%+*K("/H $K%$K*K$$#$*K+$(K)+)*%$K>?>1?;?K

K)*(*K%+(*K%+$K**K$K1982K%-$KK$K%$,*K %K,%"*$K38K"";K ,;K**;KF11H5>?>3?K>1981?<K-K&(%*)K"-K*%+$K% KK";K-K*%+$K *-$K#$%()K)K$%*K$%+K*%K""K%(K$K$$#$*K+$(K) +)*%$K>?>1?=K*K ).+"K%$+*K#+)*KKD+),EK>%(K"K-*K"K&%($%(& /K%(K).K*(!$K%K "($?;KK)*(*K +K%$"+K**K*K$$#$*K$% $*"))K&&")<KH
+)K*K%$+*K**K"K*%K*K1982K%$,*%$K-) 
 K+),;K$K($K*)K %$"+)%$K*K +K("K%$K&%"K(%()K(*(K*$K*K) **K)**+*<K*K($K &&()<K%(K*K*(#)K%K*K)**K%+(*C)K +#$*;K$K("/$K %$K(()*K(%()K*K +K *%%!K%+$*K%K%+#$*)K**K*K+&(#K%+(*K"K)%+"K$% *KK%$)(;K 	 <K544K;;K13<K21I23K>2005?;K%(%,(<K*K%+(*K'+*KD"-E %$+*K-*KD+),EK%$+*K)&*KK)%$K%K*)K%+(* K( *$K**K'+*%$K %(KK#*(""/K$*"K)**+*K$K$$;KK  <K551K;3K718K >7*K(;K2009?;K

$%(*+$*"/<K$%K%$K""K  K*%K*K)*(*K +C)K**$*%$<K$K*K +K ")%KK$%*K#&"#$*K*K()*(*%$K#&%)K/K  ;K$K*)K%+(*<K%-,(<K*K&(%)+*%(K)K%$))K((%(;K+)K*K)**K%$,*%$K% +"K()*K%$K$%$H+),K %$+*<K$K("K"-K#!)K*K&(%&(*/K%K(,)*K$ $#$*)K&$K%$K*K (#K%K%$,*%$K(*(K*$K-*K*K$$*K*+""/K <K)K 	
 <K136K;K*;K2243K>2016?<K-K&*K*K%$))%$K$K(#$K %(K()$*$$;K

"*%+K*K%+(*K#+)*K$%*K$$K*K)$*$K+$(K)+)* %$K>?>1?<K*K(H#$)K(K*%K%$)(K%-$C)K*+"K%$+*K-$K.()$K *)K)(*%$K*%K(*KK )$*$<K-*$K*K($K%K5K*%K20K/()<K%(K*K%$+*K% K-K%-$K)*$)K%$H ,*;KK +K)K&(#**J$K('+(J*%K%$)(K*KD )*%(/K$K(*(H )*)EK%K*K$$*;K18K;;;KF3553>?>1?;KK 
 <K576K;3K400<K 403K:K$;2K>7*K(;K2009?;KD
%K"#**%$K)""KK&"K%$K* K$%(#*%$K%$($$K *K!(%+$<K(*(<K$K%$+*K%KK&()%$K%$,*K% K$K%$)K-KK %+(*K%K*K$*K**)K#/K(,K$K%$)(K%(K*K&+( &%)K%K#&%)$K$K&H &(%&(*K)$*$;EK18K;;;KF3661;K%;K17H2567K K3K

K*(+)*K**K-$K$*($KK$-K)$*$K*K)*(*K%+(*K- ""K%((*K*K +H#$*K*%K("*K**K%-$K)K$K%$,*K%K,%"*$K18K ;;;KF2252>?>1?K$K $%*<K)K*K +#$*K$%-K()<K18K;;;KF2252>1?>1?K@)AK$ K>?>1?;K

 K
K
United Airlines – Flight Operations – WHQFO - 233 S. Wacker Drive, Floor 23 - Chicago, IL 60606 April 15, 2013

U.S Department of Transportation Docket Operations, M-30 West Building ground floor,

Room W12-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

Subject: Exemption 6612G from 14 CFR (F AR Section) – 121.135(a)(3) Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2000-8525 - Request for extension

Dear Sir or Madam:

In accordance with the provisio ns of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 11, Section 11.25, United Airlines, Inc. (United) petitions for renewal of Exemption No. 6612G as amended, from April 30, 2013, to April 30, 2015.

Exemption 6612G, as amended, exempts Unit ed from the provis ions of 14 CFR § 121.135(a)(3), which requires all certificate hol ders to “have the date of last revision on each page” of each manual required by § 121.133. Section 121.133 requires “a manual for the use and guidance of... groun d operations and management personnel in conducting its operations.”

United petitions the Administrator for an extension of the termination date of Exemption 6612G, as amended, which permits United to use electronic digital technology to satisfy the r equirements of 14 CFR § 121.135( a)(3) instead of printing

the date of the last revision on each page.

All the reasons and substantia tion contained in the origin al petition dated April 4, 1996, remain the same. Additionally, there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safe ty that were the basis for granting the original petition.

Thank you for your consideration of this petition. Please advise if any further information is required for your review.

Sincerely,

Armando Cardenas Flight Operations FA A Certification Manager
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00275-CV

In the Interest of K.R. and A.R.,

children §

§

§

§ From 233rd District Court

of Tarrant County (233-423731-07)

April 7, 2016

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the tria l court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Terrie Livingston

Chief Justice Terrie Livingston