alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            College of Information and Cyberspace
                    National Defense University
                CIC
        Search
                    Search CIC:
                        Search
                Search CIC:
                    Search
    Home

    About 
        Mission & Vision

    Faculty & Staff

    Fact Sheet

    Alumni

    Internships

    FAQ

    Admissions 
        Eligibility Requirements

    Admissions Calendar

    Application Instructions

    Apply Online

    International Students

    Academics 
        Graduate Catalog

    M.S. in Strategic Information and Cyberspace Studies
        
        JPME Master's Degree

    Cyber Workforce Master's Degree (Part Time)

    Leadership Development Programs

    Graduate Certificates

    Academic Partners

    Current Students 
        JPME II  Incoming Students

    LDP Incoming Students

    Student Registration

    Bring Your Own Device

    IA Compliance

    Completion Procedures / Order Transcripts

    Student Services and Resources

    Events
    
        Cyber Beacon

    Cyber PME Colloquium

    Hopper Award

    Lecture Series

    CYBERCOM Symposium

    NEWS

    UC2
    
        About

    Events

    Work With Us

    Center for Cybersecurity
    
        About

    Cybersecurity Center POC

    Cybersecurity Supporting Faculty

    CAE-CDE CISO Certificate Program

    Cybersecurity Trending News

    Cyber Labs
        
        Ethical Hacking

    Critical Infrastructure - SCADA

    Cyber Exercises
        
        Tabletop Exercise

    Cyber Competitions

    Cyber Resources and Awareness

    Stakeholder / Industry Advisory Council

    Contact 
        Contact Us

    Directions

    Access to Ft. McNair

    Map of Ft. McNair  Home
  NEWS
  News & Announcements
 News & Announcements News
 The Chancellor's Speaker Series By Jonathan Rauch
                Chancellor Speaker Series
 
 SHARE
 PRINT
 National Defense University


College of Information and Cyberspace

300 Fifth Ave., Bldg. 62
Fort Lesley J. McNair
Washington, DC 20319-5066

202-685-6300
                    Stay Connected
                
                
                DOD Privacy & Security
 DOD Links Disclaimer
 DOD Social Media Policy
 DOD Web Policy
 FOIA
 NDU System of Records Notice
 NDU Privacy & Security Notice
 No FEAR Act
 Open GOV
 Plain Writing Act
 Section 508
 Small Business Act
 USA.gov
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR VANADIUM INTERNATIONAL, INC. A DEVELOPMENT
STAGE COMPANY, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,081
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,081
<PP&E>                                         101,175
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 102,256
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,076
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,610
<OTHER-SE>                                     125,890
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   102,256
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,672
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,672)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,672)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,672)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)


</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"19-1852: WHITEWATER WEST INDUSTRIES v. ALLESHOUSE [ERRATA], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Pkb4JGpANu\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/11-20-2020-19-1852-whitewater-west-industries-v-alleshouse-errata-19-1852-errata-11-20-2020_1689000\/\">19-1852: WHITEWATER WEST INDUSTRIES v. ALLESHOUSE [ERRATA], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/11-20-2020-19-1852-whitewater-west-industries-v-alleshouse-errata-19-1852-errata-11-20-2020_1689000\/embed\/#?secret=Pkb4JGpANu\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“19-1852: WHITEWATER WEST INDUSTRIES v. ALLESHOUSE [ERRATA], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"Pkb4JGpANu\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Opinions\/Orders posted: WHITEWATER WEST INDUSTRIES v. ALLESHOUSE [ERRATA](pdf) Appeal Number: 19-1852 Origin: DCT Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4625

To make technical corrections to the Egg Products Inspection Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 22, 1994

Mr. BISHOP (for himself, Ms. LONG, Mr. HILLIARD, and Mr. KINGSTON)

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on

Agriculture

A BILL

To make technical corrections to the Egg Products

Inspection Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be referred to as ‘‘The Egg Products

5 Inspection Act Technical Amendments of 1994’’.

6 SEC. 101. INSPECTION.

7 (a) GENERAL AUTHORITY.—Section 5(e)(1) of the

8 Egg Products Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 1034(e)(1)) is

9 amended to read as follows:
2

HR 4625 IH

1 ‘‘(1) Subject to paragraphs (2), (3), and (4),

2 the Secretary shall make such inspections as the

3 Secretary considers appropriate of a facility or an

4 egg handler to determine if shell eggs packed into

5 containers destined for the ultimate consumer—

6 ‘‘(A) are being stored under refrigeration

7 at an average ambient temperature no greater

8 than 45 degrees Fahrenheit;

9 ‘‘(B) are being loaded or held in transport

10 vehicles equipped with refrigeration units deliv11 ering air at a temperature no greater than 45

12 degrees Fahrenheit and capable of cooling such

13 vehicles to a temperature less than or equal to

14 45 degrees Fahrenheit; and

15 ‘‘(C) contain labeling that indicates that

16 refrigeration is required.’’.

17 (b) EXEMPTION.—Section 5(e)(4) of the Egg Prod18 ucts Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 1034(e)(4)) is amended

19 to read as follows:

20 ‘‘(4) The following shall be exempt from inspection

21 under paragraph (1):

22 ‘‘(A) All egg producers with poultry flocks of

23 not more than 3,000 layers.

24 ‘‘(B) All transport vehicles of one ton or less in

25 size.’’.
3

HR 4625 IH

1 SEC. 102. PROHIBITED ACTS.

2 Section 8(c) of the Egg Products Inspection Act (21

3 U.S.C. 1037(c)) is amended—

4 (1) by striking ‘‘stored and transported’’ and

5 inserting ‘‘(1) stored’’;

6 (2) by striking ‘‘ambient’’ and inserting ‘‘aver7 age ambient’’; and

8 (3) by striking ‘‘as prescribed by rules and reg9 ulations promulgated by the Secretary’’ and insert10 ing ‘‘(2) transported in accordance with section

11 5(e)(1)(B), and (3) labeled to indicate that refrig12 eration is required.’’.

13 SEC. 103. IMPORTS.

14 Section 17(a)(3) of the Egg Products Inspection Act

15 (21 U.S.C. 1046(a)(3)) is amended by striking ‘‘under re16 frigeration at an ambient temperature of not greater than

17 45 degrees Fahrenheit, as required by’’ and inserting ‘‘in

18 accordance with the requirements of’’.

Æ
46070.

#### EASLEY v. CLEMENT.

(376 SE2d 860)

Clarke, Presiding Justice.

In 1985, Bruce Clement sued Charles Easley for breach of warranties relating to the sale of an airplane. Judgment was entered in favor of Easley in June 1986, before the effective date of OCGA § 9-15-14 and five days after the decision *Yost v. Torok,*256 Ga. 92 (344 SE2d 414) (1986). Then in October 1987, Easley filed suit against Clement alleging malicious use of process, violations of OCGA §§ 9-15-14; 13-6-11. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Clement.

In *Easley v. Clement,*187 Ga. App. 799 (371 SE2d 416) (1988), the Court of Appeals held that Easley was not required to have asserted his claim for malicious use of process as a compulsory counterclaim in the initial suit because OCGA § 9-15-14 was not effective at the time of that action and because Easley could not realistically have asserted a *Yost*claim since *Yost*was announced only 5 days before judgment was entered. We affirm this portion of the Court of Appeals’ opinion. We also affirm the portions of the Court of Appeals’ opinion that hold that summary judgment should not have been granted as to Easley’s claim for special damages and that hold that Easley may not recover under OCGA § 9-15-14. However, for the reasons stated in *Vogtle v. Coleman,*259 Ga. 115 (_ SE2d _) (1989), we reverse the portion of the Court of Appeals’ opinion that disallowed attorney fees and expenses of litigation under OCGA § 13-6-11 for prosecuting his *Yost*claim.

One other issue raised by Clement merits comment. Clement argues in this appeal that Easley’s claim for attorney fees under OCGA § 13-6-11 is barred by *res judicata*because that claim was raised and denied in the initial action and no appeal was sought. Certainly, *res judicata*would bar Easley’s claim for attorney fees incurred in defending against the initial action. Moreover, attorney fees for defending against an action are not available under OCGA § 13-6-11 in any event. The only attorney fees and expenses that can be recovered by *108Easley are those incurred in prosecuting the second action. See *Vogtle,*supra. The issue of the recoverability of those fees could not have been raised or reached in the first action.

Decided March 2, 1989

Reconsideration denied March 29, 1989.

*James W. McKenzie, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Donald R. Andersen,*for appellee.

*Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part.*

*All the Justices concur.*
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"Patrick Chesnut","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/chesnutp\/","title":"Notice of Adopted Amendments to the Federal Circuit Rules of Practice - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"004CzyHjhj\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/notice-of-adopted-amendments-to-the-federal-circuit-rules-of-practice-3\/\">Notice of Adopted Amendments to the Federal Circuit Rules of Practice<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/notice-of-adopted-amendments-to-the-federal-circuit-rules-of-practice-3\/embed\/#?secret=004CzyHjhj\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Notice of Adopted Amendments to the Federal Circuit Rules of Practice” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"004CzyHjhj\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 2071(b) and Federal Circuit Rule 47(a), the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has adopted amendments to Federal Circuit Rules of Practice 25, 26, 27, 28, 28.1, 30, 31, 32, 33, 33.1, 34, 35, 39, 40, 41, 47.4, 47.5, and 47.6. The court received and reviewed public […]"}
# 20 Years of Academic Partnerships

/ Published May 18, 2015
iCollege reps Brenda Roth & Patty Coopersmith (center) with Academic Partner Capitol College leadersSince 1995, the NDU iCollege has been working with academic partner universities across the United States to accept 9, 12, or 15 graduate semester credits from the college's certificate programs.  iCollege grads who successfully complete one of our certificate programs have the option of over 30 current academic partners to consider for completion a Master's Degree, MBA, Doctoral program, or PhD in many different areas.  Most of our partner schools now offer online and part time options.  Some offer military or other discounts. Our very first academic partners - Syracuse University and the University of Maryland University College (UMUC) are still very strong partners today and have accepted hundreds of iCollege grads into their programs.  Since those early days, we have maintained the number of partner universities between 30-40 schools across the nation, including in the southern and western U.S. DoD military and civilians attend the iCollege at no tuition, and Federal Agency students attend at a very low tuition rate.  Once their iCollege education is nearing completion, students can apply to a partner school, and if accepted, transfer the number of credits spelled out in our signed Memoranda of Understanding (MOU). This is not an automatic acceptance of the student, so he/she must still apply to the partner school, be accepted, and follow our partner's admission rules and other requirements.  Students in the DOD Information Assurance Scholarship Program (IASP) have their tuition pre-paid at the university partner.  Most students (or their organizations), however, are responsible to cover tuition and fees at the partner school.
Remember, this is a great way to use your iCollege credits to get you up to 1⁄2 of the way to a Master’s Degree.  The iCollege does offer one Master’s Degree of its own (Master of Science in Government Information Leadership), but this is a highly competitive program and focused on government.  If you are looking for a wider range of degrees, please consider attending one of our partner schools.  

A full listing of partner schools and the POC at each school can be found on our website, partner page at:  http://icollege.ndu.edu/Academics/AcademicPartners.aspx .  Questions about the partner program should be directed to coopersmithp@ndu.edu.
?

150

150

150

150

150

150

150

150

150

150

150

150

150

150 150

150

150

150

§ ̈¦8

§ ̈¦ § ̈¦8

8 § ̈¦8

¬«98 E V A N H E W E S H W Y

CALIFORNIA

CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

ESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

ESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS

IMPERIAL CO

East

Mesa

Power

Drop

NumberThree

Experimental

Farm Number One

Experimental

Farm NumberTwo

Midway

Well

Power

Drop NumberTwo

Midway

Well NW

Grays

Well

Glamis

SW

Glamis

SE Cactus

Midway

Well

36

14

13

36

36

17

36

36

15

16

36

19

3621

20

36

36

18

24

36

3622

3623

36

36

36

36

36

N

36

16

36

36

18

12

15

25000m

14

17

13

36

3619

20

3621

36

36

24

25

3612 N

36

000m

22

3623

678 679 680 681 682 683 684 85 6 687 6 000m 86

677 6 6 80 6

E

676 78 79 6 81 682 683 684 685 000m

1

6

850

000

E

1810

87

FEET

40'

000

FEET

42'30"

40'

115°07'

115° 30" 2'

30" 2'30"

42'

5'

30"

07' 5' 30"

32°

32°

37'30" 30"

45' 45'

32° 37'

115°

00'

32°

115°

00'

940

000 FEET

6 000 FEET

6 910

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

CALIFORNIA

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

MIDWAY WELL, CA-BCN

2012

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

WX Interstate Route /. US Route H State Route

MIDWAY WELL QUADRANGLE

CALIFORNIA-BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

This map was produced to conform with the

National Geospatial Program US Topo Product Standard, 2011.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.6.1

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0

MILES

1

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

Imagery......................................................NAIP, May 2010

Roads................................................©2006-2011 TomTom

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2011

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2010

Contours.............................National Elevation Dataset, 2009

Boundaries..............Census, IBWC, IBC, USGS, 1972 - 2010

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 11S

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: California Coordinate System of 1983

(zone 6)

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

PS

11S

×

Ù

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2012 MAGNETIC NORTH

DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

1° 3 ́

19 MILS

11° 35 ́

206 MILS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

# AGENCY:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) gives notice as required by 42 CFR 83.12(e) of a decision to evaluate a petition to designate a class of employees at Blockson Chemical Company (also known as Olin Mathieson), Jolit, Illinois, to be included in the Special Exposure Cohort under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000.  The initial proposed definition for the class being evaluated, subject to a revision as warranted by the evaluation, is as follows:

*Facility:*                         Blockson Chemical Company (also known as Olin Mathieson).                     

*Location:*                         Joliet, Illinois.                    

*Job Titles and/or Job Duties:*                         All workers who worked in Building 55 at the Blockson Chemical Company.                     

*Period of Employment:*                         January 1, 1951 to December 31, 1962.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Larry Elliott, Director, Office of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, OH 45226, Telephone 513-533-6800 (this is not a toll-free number).  Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to                         *OCAS@CDC.GOV.*

Dated: August 11, 2006.

John Howard, 

Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 06-6985  Filed 8-16-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-19-M