alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 302.10 Closeout. ( a ) *Expiration of the right to incur costs.* The right to incur programmatic costs under this part will expire at the end of the period of performance. The right to incur closeout costs under this part will expire at the end of the 120-day closeout period, unless this period is extended in writing by the Grants Officer.
( b ) *Final submissions.* Within 120 calendar days after the completion of projects and activities funded under this part, but in no event later than the closeout period expiration date identified in paragraph (a) of this section, each grant recipient must submit— ( 1 ) A final financial report to NTIA/NIST, following the procedures of 2 CFR 200.344(a); and
( 2 ) A final performance report to NTIA/NIST, following the procedures of 2 CFR 200.344(a).
( c ) *Disposition of unexpended balances.* Any funds that remain unexpended after closeout shall cease to be available to the recipient and shall be returned to the Federal Government.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Tammy L. Cameron, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report of Depomed, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



March 6,
2009

By:

/s/ TAMMY L. CAMERON Tammy L. Cameron Vice President, Finance and
Interim Principal Accounting Officer


---
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136866 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136866 

 COA: 285359 

Muskegon CC: 01-046247-FC

THEODORE ANTHONY LEE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 18, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion 

for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G). 

s1117 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 25, 2008 

 Clerk
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with this Quarterly Report of HIV-VAC Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the year period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin Murray, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the
         period ending June 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material
         respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HIV-VAC
         Inc.

Date: September 30, 2011

/s/ Kevin Murray
Kevin Murray
Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CHIREX INC.
DECEMBER 31, 1997 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED ON FORM 10-K AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           5,347
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,811
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     23,225
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,774
<PP&E>                                         137,894
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,139
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 203,067
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,009
<BONDS>                                         69,675
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           118  
<OTHER-SE>                                      92,977
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   203,067
<SALES>                                         93,362
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                94,100
<CGS>                                           71,440
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   92,869
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,164
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,052
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (985)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (335)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (650)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (650)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)
        

</TABLE>
§ 22.359 Emission limitations. The rules in this section govern the spectral characteristics of emissions in the Public Mobile Services, except for the Air-Ground Radiotelephone Service (see § 22.861, instead) and the Cellular Radiotelephone Service (see § 22.917, instead). ( a ) *Out of band emissions.* The power of any emission outside of the authorized operating frequency ranges must be attenuated below the transmitting power (P) by a factor of at least 43 + 10 log (P) dB.
( b ) *Measurement procedure.* Compliance with these rules is based on the use of measurement instrumentation employing a resolution bandwidth of 30 kHz or more. In the 60 kHz bands immediately outside and adjacent to the authorized frequency range or channel, a resolution bandwidth of at least one percent of the emission bandwidth of the fundamental emission of the transmitter may be employed. A narrower resolution bandwidth is permitted in all cases to improve measurement accuracy provided the measured power is integrated over the full required measurement bandwidth (i.e., 30 kHz or 1 percent of emission bandwidth, as specified). The emission bandwidth is defined as the width of the signal between two points, one below the carrier center frequency and one above the carrier center frequency, outside of which all emissions are attenuated at least 26 dB below the transmitter power.
( c ) *Alternative out of band emission limit.* Licensees in the Public Mobile Services may establish an alternative out of band emission limit to be used at specified frequencies (band edges) in specified geographical areas, in lieu of that set forth in this section, pursuant to a private contractual arrangement of all affected licensees and applicants. In this event, each party to such contract shall maintain a copy of the contract in their station files and disclose it to prospective assignees or transferees and, upon request, to the FCC.
( d ) *Interference caused by out of band emissions.* If any emission from a transmitter operating in any of the Public Mobile Services results in interference to users of another radio service, the FCC may require a greater attenuation of that emission than specified in this section.
[70 FR 19308, Apr. 13, 2005]
nvls_Ex_10-20


		
			Exhibit 10.20
		

		
			AMENDMENT to the
		

		
			EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
		

		
			between
		

		
			Nivalis Therapeutics, Inc. 
		

		
			and
		

		
			David M. Rodman, M.D. (“Employee”)
		

		
			 
		

		
			WHEREAS, Nivalis Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) and the Employee entered into an employment agreement (the “Agreement”) effective as of April 18, 2016;
		

		
			 
		

		
			WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee desire to amend the Agreement to change the provision relating to accelerated vesting of stock options in connection with Termination/Severance;
		

		
			 
		

		
			NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual covenants contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows:
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

			
	
			
				 1.
			

			
	
			
			Section 5(e)(iii) is amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 




		
			 
		

		
			(iii)  the Company shall cause any issued but unvested options to vest in full and to cause any issued but unvested restricted stock units scheduled to vest in the twelve (12) months following Employee’s Termination Date to immediately vest; provided, however, that this sentence shall not diminish the 100% vesting contemplated by 5(g) below in connection with a Change of Control.
		

		
			 
		

			
	
			
				 2.
			

			
	
			
			Except as amended herein, the provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 




		
			 
		

		
			IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed and Employee has hereunto set his hand as of January 12, 2017.
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

			
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						NIVALIS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						By:

					
					
						/s/ R. Michael Carruthers

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						Name:

					
					
						R. Michael Carruthers

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						Title:

					
					
						Chief Financial Officer

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						Date:

					
					
						1/12/17

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						EMPLOYEE

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						By:

					
					
						/s/ David M. Rodman, M.D.

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						David M. Rodman, M.D.
§ 51.515 Application of access charges. ( a ) - ( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) Notwithstanding §§ 51.505, 51.511, and 51.513(d)(2) and paragraph (a) of this section, an incumbent LEC may assess upon telecommunications carriers that purchase unbundled local switching elements, as described in § 51.319(c)(1), for intrastate toll minutes of use traversing such unbundled local switching elements, intrastate access charges comparable to those listed in paragraph (b) and any explicit intrastate universal service mechanism based on access charges, only until the earliest of the following, and not thereafter: ( 1 ) June 30, 1997;
( 2 ) The effective date of a state commission decision that an incumbent LEC may not assess such charges; or
( 3 ) With respect to a Bell operating company only, the date on which that company is authorized to offer in-region interLATA service in the state pursuant to section 271 of the Act. The end date for Bell operating companies that are authorized to offer interLATA service shall apply only to the recovery of access charges in those states in which the Bell operating company is authorized to offer such service.
( d ) Interstate access charges described in part 69 shall not be assessed by incumbent LECs on each element purchased by requesting carriers providing both telephone exchange and exchange access services to such requesting carriers' end users.
[61 FR 45619, Aug. 29, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 45587, Aug. 28, 1997; 71 FR 65750, Nov. 9, 2006]
Argued and submitted December 22,1993;

resubmitted In Banc May 11,

affirmed by an equally divided court October 26, 1994

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Appellant, v.*RICKY DONNELL SHARP, *Respondent.*

(92CR2602FE; CA A78271)

883 P2d 916

In Banc

Jonathan H. Fussner, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Andrew D. Johnson argued the cause for respondent. On the brief was Darryl E. Johnson, P.C.

Affirmed by an equally divided court.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report of Palomar Enterprises, Inc., a
Nevada  corporation  (the  "Company"),  on  Form  10-QSB  for  the  period ended
September  30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Brent  Fouch, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 15, 2004.

                                    By /s/Brent Fouch
                                       --------------------------
                                       Brent Fouch,
                                       Chief Financial Officer of
                                       Palomar Enterprises, Inc.


<PAGE>
§ 27.57 International coordination. ( a ) WCS operations in the border areas shall be subject to coordination with those countries and provide protection to non-U.S. operations in the 2305-2320 and 2345-2360 MHz bands as appropriate. In addition, satellite DARS operations in WCS spectrum shall be subject to international satellite coordination procedures.
( b ) Wireless operations in the 512-608 MHz, 614-763 MHz, 775-793 MHz, and 805-806 MHz bands are subject to current and future international agreements between the United States and Canada and the United States and Mexico. Unless otherwise modified by international treaty, licenses must not cause interference to, and must accept harmful interference from, television broadcast operations in Mexico and Canada, where these services are co-primary in the band.
( c ) Operation in the 1695-1710 MHz, 1710-1755 MHz, 1755-1780 MHz, 1915-1920 MHz, 1995-2000 MHz, 2000-2020 MHz, 2110-2155 MHz, 2155-2180 MHz, 2180-2200 MHz, 3450-3550 MHz, and 3700-3980 MHz bands is subject to international agreements with Mexico and Canada.
[62 FR 9658, Mar. 3, 1997, as amended at 67 FR 5511, Feb. 6, 2002; 69 FR 5715, Feb. 6, 2004; 72 FR 48852, Aug. 24, 2007; 79 FR 599, Jan. 6, 2014; 79 FR 32413, June 4, 2014; 79 FR 48539, Aug. 15, 2014; 86 FR 17954, Apr. 7, 2021]
§ 25.171 Space station point of contact reporting requirements. ( a ) *Annual report.* On June 30 of each year, a space station licensee or market access recipient must provide a current listing of the names, titles, addresses, email addresses, and telephone numbers of the points of contact for resolution of interference problems and for emergency response. Contact personnel should include those responsible for resolution of short-term, immediate interference problems at the system control center, and those responsible for long-term engineering and technical design issues.
( b ) *Updated information.* If a space station licensee or market access recipient point of contact information changes, the space station licensee or market access recipient must file the updated information within 10 days of the change.
( c ) *Electronic filing.* Filings under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section must be made electronically in the Commission's International Communications Filing System (ICFS) in the “Other Filings” tab of the station's current authorization file.
[86 FR 11888, Mar. 1, 2021, as amended at 88 FR 21441, Apr. 10, 2023]
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 16 (Wednesday, January 25, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 4041-4042]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-682]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[TD 9232]
RIN 1545-BD33


Guidance on Passive Foreign Investment Company (PFIC) Purging 
Elections; Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Correcting amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects temporary regulations (TD 9232) that 
were published in the Federal Register on Thursday, December 8, 2005 
(70 FR 72908) that provide certain elections for taxpayers that 
continue to be subject to the PFIC excess distribution regime of

[[Page 4042]]

section 1291 even though the foreign corporation in which they own 
stock is no longer treated as a PFIC under section 1297(a) or (e).

DATES: This correction is effective December 8, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ethan Atticks, (202) 622-3840 (not a 
toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The temporary regulations are under sections 1291(d)(2), 1297(e) 
and 1298(b)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Need for Correction

    As published, the temporary regulations (TD 9232) contain errors 
that may prove to be misleading and are in need of clarification.

List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1

    Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Correction of Publication

0
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is corrected by making the following 
correcting amendment:

PART 1--INCOME TAXES

0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read in 
part as follows:

    Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *.


Sec.  1.1297-3T  [Corrected]

0
1. Section 1.1297-3T(e)(1)(i), the language ``December 31, 2005'' is 
removed and the language ``June 30, 2006'' is added in its place.

0
2. Section 1.1298-3T(e)(1)(i), the language ``December 31, 2005'' is 
removed and the language ``June 30, 2006'' is added in its place.

Cynthia E. Grigsby,
Acting Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing 
Division, Associate Chief Counsel, (Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. 06-682 Filed 1-24-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-40636

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ANDRES CAMPOS-SALAZAR,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:17-CR-298-1

Before REAVLEY, CLEMENT, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Andres CamposSalazar has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Campos-Salazar has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 20, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-40636 Document: 00514354667 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/20/2018
No. 17-40636

2

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 17-40636 Document: 00514354667 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/20/2018
Exhibit 31.1
                            SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

     I, Randall Peterson, Chief Executive Officer certify that:

     1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Softwall
Equipment Corporation.;

     2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report.

     3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

     4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:

     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
     information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
     subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
     particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
     prepared.

     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
     annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
     evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

     5.  I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
     registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     controls; and

     6.  I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: November 14, 2003                 /S/ Randall Peterson
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Randall Peterson
                                        Chief Executive Officer and President