alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 19, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00844

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF N.R.V., A.M.A.F. AND I.I.F., CHILDREN,

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Real County, Texas

Trial Court N o. 2013

- 3094

- DC

The Honorable Cathy O. Morris, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Robin Brame's notification of late reporter's record is hereby GRANTED. Time is

extended to December 22, 2014.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WH EREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 1 9th day of December, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RADAMES SANABRIA,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 162 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of November, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

and the Motion Requesting Application for Post Submission Communication are DENIED.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"Patrick Chesnut","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/chesnutp\/","title":"Service Availability for December 14, 2022 - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"H4K4QJYmP0\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/service-availability-for-december-14-2022\/\">Service Availability for December 14, 2022<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/service-availability-for-december-14-2022\/embed\/#?secret=H4K4QJYmP0\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Service Availability for December 14, 2022” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"H4K4QJYmP0\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"On December 14, 2022, the Clerk’s Office and Circuit Library will be temporarily unavailable for public services and support from 1:00 p.m. \u2013 2:30 p.m. (Eastern)."}
§ 304-5.7 How do we review offers of payments in kind from the non-Federal sponsor or organizer of a meeting or similar function for items such as meals, transportation, and lodging when they are included in a waived or discounted registration fee? ( a ) If the non-Federal sponsor or organizer of a meeting or similar function offers to waive or discount the registration fee of an employee who is only attending the event, you are not required to separately authorize acceptance of any items included in the registration fee. If applicable, acceptance of the registration fee must be reported to U.S. Office of Government Ethics (OGE) in accordance with part 304-6 of this chapter.
( b ) When a waived or discounted registration fee is not a payment in kind pursuant to § 304-3.10 of this chapter, the employee may only accept items that you authorize separately. If applicable, the value of any payments in kind so accepted should be reported to OGE in accordance with part 304-6 of this chapter. In particular, if a registration fee is waived or discounted on the day(s) an employee is participating as a speaker, panelist, or presenter, and the registration fee includes meal(s), the employee may accept meal(s) as a payment in kind only if you review the offer and authorize acceptance. Review the reporting guidelines at § 304-6.4 of this chapter to see if the aggregated meal amounts (if more than one meal, or meals of both an employee and spouse) will need to be reported to OGE.
[84 FR 55248, Oct. 16, 2019]
No. 11-5461.

#### Surles *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
# Hall of Fame recipient honored and CIO LDP Students Graduate

/ Published April 15, 2016
On Friday, April 15, 2016, the National Defense University’s Information Resources Management College (NDU iCollege) held a combined Hall of Fame Ceremony and CIO Leadership Development Program (CIO LDP) Graduation at Fort Lesley J. McNair. 
Chancellor Jan Hamby, RADM (Ret.), USN, welcomed the Hall of Fame inductee, CIO LDP graduates, faculty/staff members, and guests.  The chancellor then introduced Ms. Melissa Hathaway, CEO of Hathaway Global Strategies LLC, who was the Distinguished Lecturer and the Hall of Fame recipient.     

The NDU iCollege Hall of Fame, established in 2012, was designed to honor Alumni and Advocates of the college. This year, the college is proud to honor Distinguished Advocate, Ms. Melissa Hathaway. Because of her significant and enduring recognition as one of the U.S. leading cyber security experts and her direct involvement in making the iCollege grow to the leading school in DoD for cyber security education, Melissa was recognized as the 2016 iCollege Hall of Fame recipient.  

After the Hall of Fame ceremony concluded, the 13 graduates from the CIO Leadership Development Program received their diplomas. Students came from DoD, the State Department, and international partner countries (Morocco, Algeria, Burundi, and South Korea). The CIO LDP is administered in a multi-week intensive, and highly interactive, student-centered educational experience emphasizing leadership skills and abilities. CIO LDP students form a learning community that fosters multiple perspectives on a wide range of issues. The curriculum provides participants with the Chief Information Officer certificate as well as course work toward the Master of Science in Government Information Leadership (CIO Concentration).  This multi-week program runs twice per year, January-April and August-November.  Questions about this event can be directed to coopersmithp@ndu.edu.
§ 128-1.5005-1 Primary delegations. The following authorities are redelegated to the heads of bureaus for use within their respective jurisdictions and shall be exercised in accordance with the policies and procedures established by the Assistant Attorney General for Administration. ( a ) Designating the PMO, for the bureau, within the following limitations: ( 1 ) Only one PMO is to be designated for the bureau, at the bureau level. Neither the title designation nor the responsibilities of the PMO are to be delegated below that level.
( 2 ) One or more PC's also may be designated for the bureau, depending upon the size and complexity of the organizational structure. Each PC is responsible solely for that property within his respective jurisdiction. The number and distribution of PC's designated is entirely at the option of the head of the bureau.
( 3 ) There is no restriction on designating a single individual as PMO and PC providing that the functions and responsibilities are compatible and are within the capabilities of a single person.
( b ) Authorizing exceptions to the FPMR use and replacement standards for office machines, furniture, furnishings and typewriters specified in §§ 101-25.3 and 101-25.4.
( c ) Authorizing exceptions to FPMR replacement standards for materials handling equipment specified in § 101-25.304.
( d ) Authorizing the procurement of passenger motor vehicles with additional systems or equipment or the procurement of additional systems or equipment for passenger motor vehicles already owned or operated by the Government, in conformance with Federal Standards No. 122 and § 101-25.304.
( e ) Authorizing the retention for official use by the bureau of abandoned or other unclaimed personal property and of personal property which is voluntarily abandoned or forfeited other than by court decree.
( f ) Determining when personal property becomes excess and reporting the excess property to the General Services Administration (GSA).
( g ) Assigning or transferring excess personal property within the bureau to other bureaus of the Department, other Federal agencies, the Legislative Branch to the Judicial Branch, to wholly-owned or mixed-ownership Government corporations, to cost-reimbursable type contractors, or to authorized grantees.
( h ) Transferring property forfeited to the Government to other authorized recipients or requesting judicial transfer of such property from others to the bureau.
( i ) Determining fair market value of abandoned and other unclaimed property retained for official use by the bureau, for deposit to a special fund for reimbursement of owners.
( j ) Approving claims and reimbursing, less direct costs, former owners of abandoned or other unclaimed personal property which has been sold or retained for official use.
( k ) Recommending non-Federal grantee excess property screeners to GSA as required in FPMR 101-43.320(h).
( l ) When authorized by statutory authority, vesting title to Government-furnished personal property in contractors or grantees.
( m ) Acquiring excess personal property from other bureaus and from other Federal agencies.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4571 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4571

 To designate the United States post office located at 103-104 Estate 
  Richmond in Saint Croix, Virgin Islands, as the ``Wilbert Armstrong 
                      United States Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 13, 1994

 Mr. de Lugo introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the United States post office located at 103-104 Estate 
  Richmond in Saint Croix, Virgin Islands, as the ``Wilbert Armstrong 
                      United States Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States post office located at 103-104 Estate Richmond in 
Saint Croix, Virgin Islands, shall be known and designated as the 
``Wilbert Armstrong United States Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States post office referred 
to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Wilbert 
Armstrong United States Post Office''.

                                 <all>
```
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

MAR 2 5 2016 

Mr. Brian Richardet 

Textron Aviation, Inc. 

One Cessna Boulevard 

Wichita, Kansas 67215 

Dear Mr. Richardet: 

Transport Airplane Directorate 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, Washington 98057-3356 

We have received your petition letter dated March 7, 2016, requesting partial relief from 

§ 25.809(a) ofTitle 14, Code ofFederal Regulations. This exemption, if granted, would 

provide relief from the requirement for a means to permit viewing ofthe likely areas of 

evacuee ground contact prior to opening the type III overwing exit on Cessna Model 700 

airplanes. 

This request was posted to the Department of Transportation's Federal Docket Management 

System (at Regulations.gov) on March 11,2016, and has been assigned Docket No. FAA20 16-4919. We are in the process of reviewing your request. We will contact you if we 

need additional information. 

If you have any questions or concerns regarding your petition or the petition process, please 

contact Mr. Alan Sinclair at (425) 227-2195, or by e-mail at Alan.Sinclair@faa.gov. 

Deana M. Stedman 

Transport Airplane Directorate 

Aircraft Certification Service
No. 11-5491.

#### Manzo-Aparicio *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1


<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 31.1

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                          302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT

I, Angela Du, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Xin Net Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  May 24, 2004

/s/ Angela Du
-----------------------
Angela Du, President, CEO
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

In the Matter of Diamond Air Charter, Inc. 

FAA Docket No. CP10EA0004 

DMS No. F AA-2010-0620 

Judge Sullivan 

AGENCY'S WITHDRAWAL OF COMPLAINT 

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), by counsel, and, pursuant to 14 CFR 

13.215, hereby withdraws its Complaint in this matter. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Alfred R. Joly;tson, Jr. 

Regional Counsel 

By: ~ A ~~\,__ Zacharikaan 

Attorney 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

. 718 553-3258 

718 995-5699 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that the foregoing Agency's Withdrawal of Complaint has been sent 

via first class mail and e-mail to the following: 

Gregory S. Winton 

Aviation Law Experts , LLC 

One Research Court, Suite 450 

Rockville, MD 20850 

Email: Greg@AviationLawExperts.Com 

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

Email: Diane.Mays@DOT.GOV 

I hereby certify that the foregoing Agency's Withdrawal of Complaint has been sent 

via first class mail to the following: 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building, Suite 2W1000 

Federal Aviation Administration J 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Room924A 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Date: JUL 2 5 2012 V~ks~t~ Paralegal Specialist 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of Regional Counsel 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

2
No. 11-9546.

#### Arnold *v.*Virginia.

Sup. Ct. Va. Certiorari denied.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Appointment of New Advisory Council Members - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"cIx2B42rlC\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/appointment-of-new-advisory-council-members\/\">Appointment of New Advisory Council Members<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/appointment-of-new-advisory-council-members\/embed\/#?secret=cIx2B42rlC\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Appointment of New Advisory Council Members” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"cIx2B42rlC\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Chief Judge Kimberly A. Moore has appointed the following new members to the Advisory Council for the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit: Deanne Maynard (Chair), Claudia Burke, Alexander Canizares, Adam Keser, Monica Lateef, Melissa Patterson, and Katherine Smith.\u00a0 These appointments are for terms of three years and are effective May 22, […]"}
[Civ. No. 15314.

Second Dist., Div. One.

Dec. 5, 1946.]

#### ROYAL E. BURTON, Appellant, v. DOROTHY C. BURTON, Respondent.

George Stahlman for Appellant.

Rupert B. Turnbull for Respondent.

DORAN, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment for defendant in an action seeking to vacate an interlocutory judgment for divorce.

The action herein was filed March 22,1945; the interlocutory decree was entered March 27, 1944. It is alleged that the parties lived together as man and wife during the pendency *170of the divorce action and at the time the interlocutory decree was entered; that plaintiff herein was deceived and misled.

It is contended on appeal that plaintiff’s conduct in the divorce action constituted extrinsic fraud; that “there was a valid reconciliation which vitiated the proceedings for divorce”; and, “that there has been more than a slight showing of facts,” by plaintiff and appellant herein, “justifying the setting aside of the default divorce.”

In the trial of the within action the court found against plaintiff, the appellant herein. Although the evidence is conflicting, it is sufficient to sustain the findings. Such conclusion disposes of appellant’s other contentions above mentioned.

The judgment is affirmed.

York, P. J., and White, J., concurred.
#### § 22.591 Channels for point-to-point operation.

The following channels are allocated for assignment to fixed transmitters that support other transmitters that provide public mobile service. Unless otherwise indicated, all channels have a bandwidth of 20 kHz and are designated by their center frequencies in MegaHertz.

| VHF Channels |
| --- |
| 72.02 | 72.36 | 72.80 | 75.66 |
| 72.04 | 72.38 | 72.82 | 75.68 |
| 72.06 | 72.40 | 72.84 | 75.70 |
| 72.08 | 72.42 | 72.86 | 75.72 |
| 72.10 | 72.46 | 72.88 | 75.74 |
| 72.12 | 72.50 | 72.90 | 75.76 |
| 72.14 | 72.54 | 72.92 | 75.78 |
| 72.16 | 72.58 | 72.94 | 75.80 |
| 72.18 | 72.62 | 72.96 | 75.82 |
| 72.20 | 72.64 | 72.98 | 75.84 |
| 72.22 | 72.66 | 75.42 | 75.86 |
| 72.24 | 72.68 | 75.46 | 75.88 |
| 72.26 | 72.70 | 75.50 | 75.90 |
| 72.28 | 72.72 | 75.54 | 75.92 |
| 72.30 | 72.74 | 75.58 | 75.94 |
| 72.32 | 72.76 | 75.62 | 75.96 |
| 72.34 | 72.78 | 75.64 | 75.98 |
| 72.10 | 72.46 | 72.88 | 75.74 |
| 72.12 | 72.50 | 72.90 | 75.76 |
| 72.14 | 72.54 | 72.92 | 75.78 |
| 72.16 | 72.58 | 72.94 | 75.80 |
| 72.18 | 72.62 | 72.96 | 75.82 |
| 72.20 | 72.64 | 72.98 | 75.84 |
| 72.22 | 72.66 | 75.42 | 75.86 |
| 72.24 | 72.68 | 75.46 | 75.88 |
| 72.26 | 72.70 | 75.50 | 75.90 |
| 72.28 | 72.72 | 75.54 | 75.92 |
| 72.30 | 72.74 | 75.58 | 75.94 |
| 72.32 | 72.76 | 75.62 | 75.96 |
| 72.34 | 72.78 | 75.64 | 75.98 |
| UHF Channels—State of Hawaii |

| 488.250 | 491.250 | 489.750 | 492.750 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 488.750 | 491.750 | 490.250 | 493.250 |
| 489.250 | 492.250 | 490.750 | 493.750 |

(a) The 72-76 MHz channels may be used in point-to-multipoint configurations. The 72-76 MHz channels are also allocated for assignment in the Private Radio Services (see part 90 of this chapter).

(b) [Reserved]

(c) Channels in the frequency ranges 488.250-490.750 and 491.250-493.750 MHz may be assigned only to inter-island fixed stations located in the State of Hawaii.

[59 FR 59507, Nov. 17, 1994; 60 FR 9889, Feb. 22, 1995, as amended at 70 FR 19309, Apr. 13, 2005; 78 FR 25174, Apr. 29, 2013]