alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 211.4 Policy. During the continuance of a war in which the United States is engaged and when the provisions of this part are invoked, all communications common carriers shall comply with the following principles insofar as possible: ( a ) Whenever necessary to maintain or restore a service having a designated priority, services having lower priority, lower subpriority, or no priority, will be interrupted in the reverse order of priority starting with nonpriority services.
( b ) When services are interrupted to restore priority services, carriers will endeavor if feasible to notify users of the reason for the preemption.
( c ) When public correspondence circuits are needed to satisfy requirements for priority services, idle circuits will be selected first. A minimum number of public correspondence circuits shall at all times be kept available so as to provide for the transmission of precedence-type messages and calls.
( d ) Communications common carriers will not interrupt conversations having priority classification except insofar as necessary to restore services of higher priority.
( e ) It is recognized that as a practical matter in providing for the maintenance or restoration of a priority service or services operating within a multiple circuit-type facility (such as a carrier band, cable, or multiplex system), lower priority, lower subpriority, or nonpriority services on paralleled channels within a band or system may be restored concurrently with higher priority services. Such reactivation shall not, however, interfere with the expedited restoration of other priority services.
( f ) The Executive Agent is authorized to instruct the carriers on the percentage of government-switched network intermachine trunks to be restored to provide capacity for priority access line traffic.
( g ) The carriers are authorized to honor NCS-certified priorities from other authorized carriers for leased facilities.
( h ) The carriers are authorized to honor restoration priorities certified by the Executive Agent.
( i ) To ensure the effectiveness of the system of restoration priorities established by this part it is essential that rigorous standards be applied. Users are requested and directed to examine their private line service requirements in light of the criteria specified in this part and with regard to the availability of alternate communications facilities such as public correspondence message services, and Government-owned emergency communications systems.
EXHIBIT 32.2

# Certification of Chief
Financial Officer Pursuant to
Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Amendment No.
1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2006 (this
report), of SPAR Group, Inc. (the registrant), the undersigned
hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

1.       
          The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2.       
          The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.

| | /s/ Charles Cimitile
Charles Cimitile
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and
Secretary
April 17, 2007
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SPAR Group, Inc. and will be
retained by SPAR Group, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 21, 2009 

s1214 

Order 

 

December 21, 2009 

139490 

DIANE RIEMERSMA-STOREY, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139490 

 COA: 291490 

Kent CC: 83-048746-DM 

RODGER WAYNE RIEMERSMA, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 21, 2009 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
NDU Electives Fair - Wed, Feb 4th (1145-1300) - OPEN ONLY TO NDU STUDENTS
 By Patricia Coopersmith
  **** **Open to current NDU students ONLY**-   NDU Electives Fair scheduled for this Wednesday, February 4, 2015 from 1145-1300 in the Marshall Hall atrium.  iCollege Offerings for Winter/Spring electives include... Date/time                   Course number and Title                                                        Professor(s) **Monday/Thursday**
            **0830-1100**
            **6017.1-Cyber Security in the 21st Century (CSL)**
            ****
            **Duke/Drumheller****6018-Protecting Critical Infrastructures (CSL)**
            ****
            **Saunders/Hurley****6029-Strategies for Securing The Cyber Supply Chain (CSL/EIT)**
            ****
            **Mattern****Monday/Thursday**
            **1300-1530**
            **6025-Infrastructures and Information Operations (CSL)****
            ****
            **Churbuck****Tuesday/Friday**
            **0830-1100**
            ****
            **6024.1-Cyber Security Awareness (CSL) (Beginner)**
            **Chen/Saunders****6031-Web Technologies in Government (EIT)**
            **Wendt****6019-Continuity of Operations Planning (CSL)**
            ****
            **Kasprzak****6017.2-Cyber Security in the 21st Century (CSL)**
            ****
            **Duke/Drumheller****6016-Strategic Challenges in Cyberspace (CSL)**
            **Hurley****Tuesday/Friday**
            **1300-1530**
            **6024.2-Cyber Security Awareness (CSL) (Advanced)**
            ****
            **Chen/Saunders****6030-Future Emerging Information Technologies (EIT)**
            ****
            **Wendt**
# Ms. Nakia Logan

### Director of Office of Student Services

### 

### 

Bio coming soon.
No. 11-5331.

#### Brown *v.*Cleveland Municipal School District, aka Cleveland Metropolitan School District, et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# Amtsblatt C 182A/2013

| | ISSN 1977-088X
  doi:10.3000/1977088X.CA2013.182.ger |
| --- | --- |
| Amtsblatt
  der Europäischen Union | C 182A |
| | |
| Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache | Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen | 56. Jahrgang27. Juni 2013 |

ISSN 1977-088X

doi:10.3000/1977088X.CA2013.182.ger

Amtsblatt

der Europäischen Union

C 182A

Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache

Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen

56. Jahrgang27. Juni 2013

---

| Informationsnummer | Inhalt | Seite |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Bekanntmachungen |
| | VERWALTUNGSVERFAHREN |
| | Europäisches Amt für Personalauswahl (EPSO) |
| 2013/C 182A/01 | Reserveliste — Allgemeines Auswahlverfahren — EPSO/AD/235/12 — Rechts- und Sprachsachverständige (AD 7) kroatischer Sprache (HR) | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Inhalt

Seite

V   Bekanntmachungen

VERWALTUNGSVERFAHREN

Europäisches Amt für Personalauswahl (EPSO)

2013/C 182A/01

Reserveliste — Allgemeines Auswahlverfahren — EPSO/AD/235/12 — Rechts- und Sprachsachverständige (AD 7) kroatischer Sprache (HR)

1

ÜBERSICHT DER IM C A-AMTSBLATT VERÖFFENTLICHTEN AUSWAHLVERFAHREN

Anbei finden Sie eine Liste der C A-Amtsblätter, die im Jahr 2013 bisher veröffentlicht wurden.

Die Amtsblätter sind — wenn nicht anders angegeben — in allen Sprachfassungen erschienen.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 27 | (RO) |
| 29 | |
| 33 | |
| 34 | |
| 36 | (DA) |
| 41 | (BG) |
| 43 | (EN) |
| 49 | (ET) |
| 50 | (HU) |
| 51 | (SL) |
| 54 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 58 | (EN/GA) |
| 75 | |
| 81 | |
| 82 | |
| 88 | (BG) |
| 89 | (CS) |
| 94 | |
| 104 | |
| 109 | |
| 111 | |
| 112 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 117 | (ET) |
| 118 | |
| 120 | |
| 131 | |
| 143 | |
| 160 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 162 | |
| 166 | |
| 167 | |
| 168 | |
| 172 | |
| 173 | |
| 174 | |
| 176 | (BG/DE/EN/ET/FI/IT/LT/LV/MT/NL/PL/PT/SK/SL/SV) |
| 180 | (MT) |
| 182 | (DE/EN/FR) |

5

27

(RO)

29

33

34

36

(DA)

41

(BG)

43

(EN)

49

(ET)

50

(HU)

51

(SL)

54

(DE/EN/FR)

58

(EN/GA)

75

81

82

88

(BG)

89

(CS)

94

104

109

111

112

(DE/EN/FR)

117

(ET)

118

120

131

143

160

(DE/EN/FR)

162

166

167

168

172

173

174

176

(BG/DE/EN/ET/FI/IT/LT/LV/MT/NL/PL/PT/SK/SL/SV)

180

(MT)

182

(DE/EN/FR)

| DE | |
| --- | --- |

DE

---

V Bekanntmachungen

VERWALTUNGSVERFAHREN

Europäisches Amt für Personalauswahl (EPSO)

| 27.6.2013 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | CA 182/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2013

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

CA 182/1

---

RESERVELISTE (1)

ALLGEMEINES AUSWAHLVERFAHREN

EPSO/AD/235/12

RECHTS- UND SPRACHSACHVERSTÄNDIGE (AD 7) KROATISCHER SPRACHE (HR)

(2013/C 182 A/01)

Zweig „Gerichtshof“

| BIŽAJIĆ | Robert |
| --- | --- |
| BOŽAC | Ivana |
| IVANČEVIĆ | Ivana |
| KUKEC | Lana |
| ROMIĆ | Mirna |
| STANKOVIĆ | Danijel |
| ZELJKO | Maja |

BIŽAJIĆ

Robert

BOŽAC

Ivana

IVANČEVIĆ

Ivana

KUKEC

Lana

ROMIĆ

Mirna

STANKOVIĆ

Danijel

ZELJKO

Maja

Die Reserveliste gilt bis zum 23. April 2016.

---

(1)  Auf ausdrücklichen Wunsch einer erfolgreichen Prüfungsteilnehmerin oder eines erfolgreichen Prüfungsteilnehmers wird ihr bzw. sein Name nicht veröffentlicht.

---
No. 11-5540.

#### Jones *v.*Unger, Superintendent, Wyoming Correctional Facility.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"18-1486: SUCIC v. WILKIE [OPINION], Precedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"xH9sOtKZEz\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/4-23-2019-18-1486-sucic-v-wilkie-opinion-precedential-18-1486-opinion-4-23-2019\/\">18-1486: SUCIC v. WILKIE [OPINION], Precedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/4-23-2019-18-1486-sucic-v-wilkie-opinion-precedential-18-1486-opinion-4-23-2019\/embed\/#?secret=xH9sOtKZEz\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“18-1486: SUCIC v. WILKIE [OPINION], Precedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"xH9sOtKZEz\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Opinions\/Orders posted: SUCIC v. WILKIE [OPINION](pdf) Appeal Number: 18-1486 Origin: CAVC Precedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
No. 11-581.

#### Commissioner of Internal Revenue *v.*DSDBL, Ltd., et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Rockingham

No. 79-358

#### Paul P. Riccardi v. Paul Garabedian

June 12, 1980

*John E. Skorko,*of Derry, by brief and orally, for the plaintiff.

*Frederick W. Murdock, Jr.,*of Massachusetts, by brief and orally, for the defendant.

Memorandum Opinion

This is an appeal from the Trial Court’s *(Goode,*J.) denial of the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, which was filed after we *417remanded the case to the trial court. *Riccardi v. Garabedian,*118 N.H. 191, 384 A.2d 788 (1978).

In that case, the trial court denied plaintiffs motion for a continuance and required him to proceed with a trial without the benefit of counsel. When the question arose whether that denial was an abuse of discretion, we indicated that the plaintiff appeared to make out a reasonable case for a continuance. At that time, however, we declined to order a new trial because we were unaware of what facts were submitted to the trial court on that issue. *Id.*We now have the benefit of the entire record, which discloses the facts that were submitted to the trial court in support of the motion for continuance and the subsequent motion for new trial. Having reviewed that record we conclude that the plaintiff has established the facts set forth in his affidavit, which we previously indicated made out a reasonable case for a continuance and a new trial. *Id.*

We are of the opinion that the trial court’s denial of the plaintiff’s motion, viewed in the light of our discussion in *Riccardi v. Garabedian supra,*requires that an order granting the plaintiff a new trial be entered.

*So ordered.*
No. 11-9287.

#### Karagianes *v.*Thomas, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# Court of Appeals

**First District of Texas**

BILL OF COSTS

No. 01

- 14

- 00281

- CV

Forrest Lake Townhouse Association, Inc.

v

.

Billy B. Martin

NO. 2012

- 72008 IN THE 157TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS C OUNTY

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATUS PAID BY

EXHIBIT FEE
MT FEE
MT FEE
MT FEE
MT FEE
CLK RECORD
FILING
STATEWIDE EFILING $25.00 $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 $126.00 $175.00 $20.00 11/04/2014
09/15/2014
06/14/2014
06/09/2014
05/13/2014
04/14/2014
04/04/2014
04/04/2014 E

- PAID
E

- PAID
E

- P AID
E

- PAID
E

- PAID

PAID
E

- PAID
E

- PAID APE
APE
APE
APE
ANT
ANT
ANT
ANT



### The costs incurred on appeal to the First Court of Appeals Houston, Texas are $38 6 .00.

Court costs in this case have been taxed in this Court’s judgment

I, Christopher A. Pri ne , Clerk o f the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, do hereby certify that this is a true statement of the costs of appeal in this case.IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the seal of the Court of Appeals for the First District of Te xas, this April 10 , 2015

.
No. 11-141.

#### Peanut Farmers *v.*Murphy, Administrator, Risk Management Agency.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
SUPREME COURT — APPELLATE DIVISION — SECOND DEPARTMENT.

December I9, I9I9.

#### THE PEOPLE v. ALBERTA MAURILLA.

(189 App. Div. 809.)

Trial—Prosecution por murder—Improper summing up by district ATTORNEY.

It is improper for a district attorney in summing up in a prosecution for murder to speak of the scorn and criticism to which the jury will expose themselves if they fail to convict the defendant and to refer to the failure of other juries to do what the district attorney considered to be their duty. Facts examined, and *held,*that such conduct on the part of the prosecuting officer may be considered but does not call fbr reversal of the judgment when the proof of defendant’s guilt was convincing.

Appeal by the defendant, Alberta Maurilla, from a judg7 ment of the County Court of Rockland county, rendered against him on-the 9th day of March, 1918, convicting him of the crime of murder in the second degree, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 31st day of December, 1918, *163denying defendant’s motion for a new trial upon the ground of newly-discovered evidence.

*Frank Comesky,*for the appellant.

*Morton Lexow, District Attorney,*for the respondent.

Per Curiam :

The learned district attorney was over-zealous in summing up this case, where he spoke of the scorn and criticism to which the jury would expose themselves if they failed to convict the defendant, and in his reference to the alleged failure on the part of other juries to do what the district attorney considered Was their duty. The learned county judge should have heeded the protest of defendant’s counsel and should have cautioned and restrained the prosecuting officer. If the proof of defendant’s guilt was not so convincing, the action of the prosecuting officer might he considered on the question of reversal of the judgment of conviction.

The judgment, as well as the order denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial upon the ground of newly-discovered evidence, must be affirmed.

Jenk, P. J., Putnam, Blackmar, Kelly and Jaycox, JJ., concurred.

Judgment of conviction of the County Court of Rockland county, and order, affirmed.
§ 400.9 Financial and administrative requirements. ( a ) *General.* The requirements of 2 CFR part 200, the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, including applicable cost principles referenced at subpart E, govern the implementation and management of grants awarded under this part.
( b ) *Reporting requirements* — ( 1 ) *Performance reports.* Each grant recipient shall submit an annual performance report to NHTSA, following the procedures of 2 CFR 200.328, within 90 days after each fiscal year that grant funds are available, except when a final report is required under § 400.10(b)(2).
( 2 ) *Financial reports.* Each recipient shall submit quarterly financial reports to NHTSA, following the procedures of 2 CFR 200.327, within 30 days after each fiscal quarter that grant funds are available, except when a final voucher is required under § 400.10(b)(1).
1

Good Neighbor Environmental Board Meeting

Sul Ross University

Alpine, Texas

October 24-26, 2006

AGENDA

Meeting Theme: Big Bend / El Gran Recodo

October 24, 2006

8:00 a.m. Registration

8:30 a.m. Welcome Remarks

Rafael DeLeon, Director, EPA Office of Cooperative Environmental Management

Paul Ganster, Chair, Good Neighbor Environmental Board

Opening Remarks

Vic Morgan, President, Sul Ross University

Mickey Clouse, Mayor of Alpine

Judge Val Clark Beard, Brewster County 

Self Introductions

9:15 a.m. Speaker Presentations Begin

9:15 a.m. – Keynote: Dr. Ernesto Enkerlin, President, National Commission on 

Protected Areas, Mexico

10:00 a.m. – Keynote: Russ Whitlock , Texas National Parks State Coordinator, National 

Park Service

10:45 a.m. Break

11:00: a.m. – Paul Silber, private landowner - Wild & Scenic Rivers program

11:45 a.m. - Tom Beard, Far West Texas Water Planning Region – Regional Water 

Planning and Water Availability 

12:30 p.m. Lunch

2:00 p.m. Public Comment Session, including Tenth Report Input

2:45 p.m. Speaker Presentations Continue
2

2:45 p.m. – David Schanbacher, TCEQ Chief Engineer - Regional Haze in Texas

3:30 p.m. Break

3:45 p.m. – Jack Schmidt, Professor, Utah State University - The Changing Physical 

Template of our Shared Rivers

4:30 p.m. – Mark Briggs, World Wildlife Fund – Controlling Invasive Plants Along the 

Rio Grande

5:15 p.m. – Additional Business

5:30 p.m. – Day One of Meeting Ends
3

Good Neighbor Environmental Board Meeting

Sul Ross University

Alpine, Texas

October 24-26, 2006

(October 25, 2006 - Board Field Trip to Big Bend National Park; will include briefings from 

National Park Service officials and a presentation from Billy Pat Mckinney on the CEMEX El

Carmen Conservation Project, located on adjoining land in Mexico)

October 26, 2006

BUSINESS MEETING 

7:30 a.m. Registration

8:00 a.m. Welcome

8:05 a.m. Discussion/Approval of Minutes from Last Meeting

8:15 a.m. Invitation for Public Input on Tenth Report Draft Recommendations

8:30 a.m. Selection of Meeting Locations, Dates for 2007

9:30 a.m. Break

10:00 a.m. Board Member Report-outs

10:45 a.m. Selection of Theme for Eleventh Report

11:30 a.m. Standard Operating Procedures for Board and Council on Environmental 

Quality

12:00 Noon Meeting Ends

10/13/06
Skip to main content (Press Enter).

College of Information and Cyberspace National Defense University

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission & Vision             
  -  Faculty & Staff             
  -  Fact Sheet             
  -  Alumni             
  -  Internships             
  -  FAQ 
-  Admissions    -  Eligibility Requirements             
  -  Admissions Calendar             
  -  Application Instructions             
  -  Apply Online             
  -  International Students 
-  Academics    -  Graduate Catalog             
  -  M.S. in Strategic Information and Cyberspace Studies      -  JPME Master's Degree             
    -  Cyber Workforce Master's Degree (Part Time) 
  -  Leadership Development Programs             
  -  Graduate Certificates             
  -  Academic Partners 
-  Current Students    -  JPME II  Incoming Students             
  -  LDP Incoming Students             
  -  Student Registration             
  -  Bring Your Own Device             
  -  IA Compliance             
  -  Completion Procedures / Order Transcripts             
  -  Student Services and Resources 
-  Events    -  Cyber Beacon             
  -  Cyber PME Colloquium             
  -  Hopper Award             
  -  Lecture Series             
  -  CYBERCOM Symposium 
-  NEWS		 
-  UC2    -  About             
  -  Events             
  -  Work With Us 
-  Center for Cybersecurity    -  About             
  -  Cybersecurity Center POC             
  -  Cybersecurity Supporting Faculty             
  -  CAE-CDE CISO Certificate Program             
  -  Cybersecurity Trending News             
  -  Cyber Labs      -  Ethical Hacking             
    -  Critical Infrastructure - SCADA 
  -  Cyber Exercises      -  Tabletop Exercise             
    -  Cyber Competitions 
  -  Cyber Resources and Awareness             
  -  Stakeholder / Industry Advisory Council 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Directions             
  -  Access to Ft. McNair             
  -  Map of Ft. McNair 

## Text/HTML

BlackboardCollaborateInstructions.pdf

## College of Information and Cyberspace

300 Fifth Ave., Bldg. 62Fort Lesley J. McNairWashington, DC 20319-5066

202-685-6300

 

### Stay Connected

                            - About DoD
                            - News 
                            - Photos & Videos 
                            - Military/DoD Websites 
                            - DoD Inspector General 
                            - Link Disclaimer 
                            - Recovery Act 
                            - FOIA 
                            - USA.gov 
                            - No FEAR Act 
                            - Join the Military 
                            - DoD Careers 
                            - Privacy & Security 
                            - Web Policy 
                            - Site Map 

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil