alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 101.79 Sunset provisions for licensees in the 1850-1990 MHz, 2110-2150 MHz, and 2160-2200 MHz bands. ( a ) FMS licensees will maintain primary status in the 1850-1990 MHz, 2110-2150 MHz, and 2160-2200 MHz bands unless and until an ET licensee requires use of the spectrum. ET licensees are not required to pay relocation costs after the relocation rules sunset. Once the relocation rules sunset, an ET licensee may require the incumbent to cease operations, provided that the ET licensee intends to turn on a system within interference range of the incumbent, as determined by TIA TSB 10-F (for terrestrial-to-terrestrial situations) or TIA TSB 86 (for MSS satellite-to-terrestrial situations) or any standard successor. ET licensee notification to the affected FMS licensee must be in writing and must provide the incumbent with no less than six months to vacate the spectrum. After the six-month notice period has expired, the FMS licensee must turn its license back into the Commission, unless the parties have entered into an agreement which allows the FMS licensee to continue to operate on a mutually agreed upon basis. The date that the relocation rules sunset is determined as follows: ( 1 ) For the 2110-2150 MHz and 2160-2175 MHz and 2175-2180 MHz bands, ten years after the first ET license is issued in the respective band; and
( 2 ) For the 2180-2200 MHz band, for MSS/ATC December 8, 2013 (*i.e.,* ten years after the mandatory negotiation period begins for MSS/ATC operators in the service), and for ET licensees authorized under part 27 ten years after the first part 27 license is issued in the band. To the extent that an MSS operator is also an ET licensee authorized under part 27, the part 27 sunset applies to its relocation and cost sharing obligations should the two sets of obligations conflict.
( b ) If the parties cannot agree on a schedule or an alternative arrangement, requests for extension will be accepted and reviewed on a case-by-case basis. The Commission will grant such extensions only if the incumbent can demonstrate that: ( 1 ) It cannot relocate within the six-month period (e.g., because no alternative spectrum or other reasonable option is available), and;
( 2 ) The public interest would be harmed if the incumbent is forced to terminate operations (e.g., if public safety communications services would be disrupted).
[61 FR 29695, June 12, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 12758, Mar. 18, 1997; 68 FR 68254, Dec. 8, 2003; 71 FR 29842, May 24, 2006; 78 FR 8272, Feb. 5, 2013]
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4596 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 629
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4596

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 28 (legislative day, June 7), 1994

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

           September 26 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

                Reported by Mr. Glenn, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To designate the building located at 2200 North Highway 67 in 
  Florissant, Missouri, for the period of time during which it houses 
   operations of the United States Postal Service, as the ``John L. 
                       Lawler, Jr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The building located at 2200 North Highway 67 in Florissant, 
Missouri, shall, for the period of time during which it houses 
operations of the United States Postal Service, be known and designated 
as the ``John L. Lawler, Jr. Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall, with respect to the period referred to in section 1, be deemed 
to be a reference to the John L. Lawler, Jr. Post Office.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 27, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 629

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4596

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

     To designate the building located at 2200 North Highway 67 in 
  Florissant, Missouri, for the period of time during which it houses 
   operations of the United States Postal Service, as the ``John L. 
                       Lawler, Jr. Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

           September 26 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

                       Reported without amendment
```
544 S.E.2d 375

#### Francis E. SHOUP, Appellant, v. Heidi S. SHOUP, Appellee.

No. 0098-00-4.

Court of Appeals of Virginia.

April 3, 2001.

Before FITZPATRICK, C.J., and BENTON, WILLIS, ELDER, BRAY, ANNUNZIATA, BUMGARDNER, FRANK, HUMPHREYS, CLEMENTS and AGEE, JJ.

UPON A PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

On March 13, 2001 came the appellant and filed a petition praying that the Court set aside the judgment rendered *240herein on February 27, 2001, and grant a rehearing *en banc*thereof.

On consideration whereof, the petition for rehearing *en bane*is granted, the mandate entered herein on February 27, 2001 is stayed pending the decision of the Court *en banc,*and the appeal is reinstated on the docket of this Court.

The parties shall file briefs in compliance with Rule 5A:35. The appellant shall attach as an addendum to the. opening brief upon rehearing *en banc*a copy of the opinion previously rendered by the Court in this matter. It is further ordered that the appellant shall file with the clerk of this Court twelve additional copies of the appendix previously filed in this case.
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Memorandum regarding communication with Under Secretary Polly 

Trottenberg and Denise Richardson and Chris Boylan of the Associated General Contractors 

of New York and representatives from two major construction firms relating to USDOT?s 

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) on ?Disadvantaged Business Enterprise: Program 

Implementation Modifications.?
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,133,758
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,095,656
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    355,193
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      45,846,050
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              48,430,657
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  32,902,552
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                48,430,657
<SALES>                                        245,626
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,046,666
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,510,626
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               609,680
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,366,851
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             932,762
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,536,040
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,536,040
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,536,040
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.96


</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-06-00247-CR

Antoinne Banks, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 331ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 3041190, HONORABLE BOB PERKINS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Antoinne Banks seeks to appeal from a judgment of conviction for delivering a

controlled substance in a drug-free zone. The notice of appeal was not timely filed. See Slaton v.

State, 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App.1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522-23 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1996). The trial court has certified that Banks waived his right of appeal. See Tex. R. App.

P. 25.2(d). The appeal is dismissed.

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices B. A. Smith, Puryear and Waldrop

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: May 11, 2006

Do Not Publish
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4581 Committee Discharged Senate (CDS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4581

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 15 (legislative day, June 7), 1994

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, 
                        Nutrition, and Forestry

                June 28 (legislative day, June 7), 1994

                          Committee discharged

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To provide for the imposition of temporary fees in connection with the 
  handling of complaints of violations of the Perishable Agricultural 
                         Commodities Act, 1930.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FILING AND HANDLING FEES FOR COMPLAINTS OF VIOLATIONS OF 
              PERISHABLE AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES ACT, 1930.

    (a) Temporary Filing Fee Required.--During fiscal years 1995 and 
1996, the Secretary of Agriculture shall require persons who submit 
petitions to the Secretary 
under section 6(a) of the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 1930 
(7 U.S.C. 499f(a)), alleging a violation of section 2 of such Act (7 
U.S.C. 499b), to include a filing fee of $60 per petition.
    (b) Temporary Handling Fee Required.--During fiscal years 1995 and 
1996, if the Secretary determines under section 6(a) of the Perishable 
Agricultural Commodities Act, 1930 (7 U.S.C. 499f(a)), that the facts 
contained in a petition described in such section warrant further 
action, the person or persons submitting the petition shall submit to 
the Secretary a handling fee of $300. The Secretary may not forward a 
copy of the complaint to the commission merchant, dealer, or broker 
involved until after the Secretary receives the required handling fee. 
In determining the amount of damages incurred by an injured person or 
persons preparatory to issuing a reparation order under section 7 of 
such Act (7 U.S.C. 499g), the Secretary shall include the amount of any 
handling fee paid by the injured person or persons under this 
subsection.
    (c) Deposit of Fees.--The Secretary shall deposit fees submitted 
under this section into the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act 
Fund.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 16, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 25.275 Particulars of operation. ( a ) Radio station authorizations issued under this part will normally specify only the frequency bands authorized for transmission and/or reception of the station.
( b ) When authorized frequency bands are specified in the station authorization, the licensee is authorized to transmit any number of r.f. carriers on any discrete frequencies within an authorized frequency band in accordance with the other terms and conditions of the authorization and the requirements of this part. Specific r.f. carrier frequencies within the authorized frequency band shall be selected by the licensee to avoid unacceptable levels of interference being caused to other earth, space or terrestrial stations. Any coordination agreements, both domestic and international, concerning specific frequency usage constraints, including non-use of any particular frequencies within the frequency bands listed in the station authorization, are considered to be conditions of the station authorization.
( c ) A license for a transmitting earth station will normally specify only the r.f. carriers having the highest e.i.r.p. density, the narrowest bandwidth, and the largest bandwidth authorized for transmission from that station. Unless otherwise specified in the station authorization, the licensee is authorized to transmit any other type of carrier not specifically listed which does not exceed the highest e.i.r.p., e.i.r.p. density and bandwidth prescribed for any listed emission.
( d ) Only the most sensitive emission(s) for which protection is being afforded from interference in the authorized receive frequency band(s) will be specified in the station authorization.
( e ) Transmission from an earth station of an unmodulated carrier at a power level sufficient to saturate a satellite transponder is prohibited, except as consented to by the space station licensee to determine transponder performance characteristics.
[58 FR 13421, Mar. 11, 1993, as amended at 81 FR 55349, Aug. 18, 2016]
#### § 5.84 Non-interference criterion.

Operation of an experimental radio station is permitted only on the condition that harmful interference is not caused to any station operating in accordance with the Table of Frequency Allocation of part 2 of this chapter. If harmful interference to an established radio service occurs, upon becoming aware of such harmful interference the Experimental Radio Service licensee shall immediately cease transmissions. Furthermore, the licensee shall not resume transmissions until the licensee establishes to the satisfaction of the Commission that further harmful interference will not be caused to any established radio service.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report of Palomar Enterprises, Inc., a
Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30,
2004,  as  filed  with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Brent Fouch, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  August 19, 2004.

                                   By /s/ Brent Fouch
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Brent Fouch,
                                     Chief Financial Officer of
                                     Palomar Enterprises, Inc.


<PAGE>
#### § 15.21 Information to user.

The users manual or instruction manual for an intentional or unintentional radiator shall caution the user that changes or modifications not expressly approved by the party responsible for compliance could void the user's authority to operate the equipment. In cases where the manual is provided only in a form other than paper, such as on a computer disk or over the Internet, the information required by this section may be included in the manual in that alternative form, provided the user can reasonably be expected to have the capability to access information in that form.

[54 FR 17714, Apr. 25, 1989, as amended at 68 FR 68545, Dec. 9, 2003]
Editorial Note on Part 36
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 74 FR 23956, May 22, 2009, 77 FR 30411, May 23, 2012, 82 FR 25538, June 2, 2017, and corrected at 83 FR 4153, Jan. 30, 2018. Nomenclature changes to part 36 also appear at 83 FR 63587, Dec. 11, 2018, and 84 FR 4360, Feb. 15, 2019.

§ 36.191 Equal access equipment. ( a ) Equal access investment includes only initial incremental expenditures for hardware and other equipment related directly to the provision of equal access which would not be required to upgrade the capabilities of the office involved absent the provision of equal access. Equal access investment is limited to such expenditures for converting central offices which serve competitive interexchange carriers or where there has been a bona fide request for conversion to equal access.
( b ) Equal access investment is first segregated from all other amounts in the primary accounts.
( c ) The equal access investment determined in this manner is allocated between the jurisdictions on the basis of relative state and interstate equal access traffic including interstate interLATA equal access traffic, intrastate interLATA equal access traffic, and BOC interstate corridor toll traffic as well as AT&T and OCC intraLATA equal access usage. Local exchange traffic and BOC intraLATA toll traffic is excluded. In the case of independent telephone companies, intrastate toll service provided by the independent local exchange company is excluded in determining intrastate usage, but intrastate toll service provided by long distance carriers affiliated with the local exchange company is included.
( d ) Effective July 1, 2001, through December 31, 2024, all study areas shall apportion Equal Access Equipment, as specified in paragraph (a) of this section, among the jurisdictions using the relative state and interstate equal access traffic, as specified in paragraph (c) of this section, for the twelve-month period ending December 31, 2000.
[52 FR 17229, May 6, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 33012, Aug. 29, 1988; 66 FR 33206, June 21, 2001; 75 FR 30301, June 1, 2010; 76 FR 30841, May 27, 2011; 79 FR 36237, June 26, 2014]
§ 52.37 Number Portability Requirements for Wireless Providers. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 88 FR 85814 , Dec. 8, 2023.
( a ) *Applicability.* This section applies to all providers of commercial mobile radio service (CMRS), as defined in 47 CFR 20.3, including resellers of wireless service.
( b ) *Authentication of port-out requests.* A CMRS provider shall use secure methods to authenticate a customer that are reasonably designed to confirm the customer's identity before effectuating a port-out request, except to the extent otherwise required by 47 U.S.C. 345 (Safe Connections Act of 2022) or Part 64 Subpart II of this chapter. A CMRS provider shall regularly, but not less than annually, review and, as necessary, update its customer authentication methods to ensure that its authentication methods continue to be secure.
( c ) - ( e ) [Reserved]
( f ) *Employee Training.* A CMRS provider shall develop and implement training for employees to specifically address fraudulent port-out attempts, complaints, and remediation. Training shall include, at a minimum, how to identify fraudulent requests, how to recognize when a customer may be the victim of fraud, and how to direct potential victims and individuals making potentially fraudulent requests to employees specifically trained to handle such incidents.
( g ) [Reserved]
( h ) This section contains information-collection and/or recordkeeping requirements. Compliance with this section will not be required until this paragraph is removed or contains a compliance date.
[88 FR 85813, Dec. 8, 2023]
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.1313 Objections. ( a ) In the case of an application to which section 309(b) of the Communications Act applies, objections based on environmental considerations shall be filed electronically as petitions to deny. If the interested person is unable to file electronically or if filing electronically would be unreasonably burdensome, such person may submit the petition by mail, with a request for waiver under § 1.1304(b).
( b ) Informal objections which are based on environmental considerations must be filed electronically prior to grant of the construction permit, or prior to authorization for facilities that do not require construction permits, or pursuant to the applicable rules governing services subject to lotteries. If the interested person is unable to file electronically or if filing electronically would be unreasonably burdensome, such person may submit the objection by mail, with a request for waiver under § 1.1304(b).
[85 FR 85531, Dec. 29, 2020]
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.802 Reports relating to continuing authority to supplement facilities or to provide temporary or emergency service.

Carriers receiving authority under part 63 of this chapter shall file quarterly or semiannual reports as required therein.
```

[112th Congress Public Law 161]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 126 STAT. 1272]]

Public Law 112-161
112th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   125 Kerr Avenue in Rome City, Indiana, as the ``SPC Nicholas Scott 
      Hartge Post Office''. <<NOTE: Aug. 10, 2012 -  [H.R. 3501]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SPC NICHOLAS SCOTT HARTGE POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 125 Kerr Avenue in Rome City, Indiana, shall be known and 
designated as the ``SPC Nicholas Scott Hartge Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``SPC 
Nicholas Scott Hartge Post Office''.

    Approved August 10, 2012.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3501:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 158 (2012):
            June 26, 28, considered and passed House.
            Aug. 1, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```