alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 08437

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name Description

x 08437\08437_Checklist.xlsx EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

08437\08437_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 08437\08437_Email Follow Up questions.docx Draft Questions for Follow Up

08437\08437_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 08437\08437_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08437\08437_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08437\08437_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08437\08437_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08437\08437_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08437\08437_PartF.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08437\08437_PartG.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08437\08437_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08437\Supplemental Documents\08437_7790 1-1 pond drawing.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

08437\Supplemental Documents\08437_7790 1-1 SFC 1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

08437\Supplemental Documents\08437_7790 1-1 SFC 2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08437\Supplemental Documents\08437_Deseret Power 7790 1-1 WaterBalance.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

08437\Supplemental Documents\Certification Statement Plant ID 08437.pdf Plant certification statement

x 08437\Supplemental Documents\Dewatering Bin cost breakout\08437_PartC 3.3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08437\Supplemental Documents\Dewatering Bin cost breakout\08437_PartC 3.4.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

08437\Supplemental Documents\Follow up documentation\08437_20090623-3B BONANZA PLANT SITE.jpg Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08437\Supplemental Documents\Follow up documentation\08437_Email Follow Up questions.docx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08437\Supplemental Documents\Follow up documentation\08437_Part D Copy 2 7790.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08437\Supplemental Documents\Follow up documentation\08437_Part F Copy 2 7790.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

N o. 04

- 13

- 00351

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF L.L.M. and E.M.

, Children

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011

- PA

- 01921

Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order is AFFIRMED.

SIGNED November 6 , 2013.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez , Justice
223PA15

#### State v. Robert Bishop

1. Motion to Admit Eugene Volokh *Pro Hoc Vice*

1. Allowed

2. Electronic Frontier Foundation’s Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief

2. Allowed
#### § 54.1522 Security reporting.

By August 31, 2023, support recipients under § 54.1516 shall file their first network security report that identifies and explains the network security controls implemented, their effectiveness in fending off cybersecurity attacks, and how those controls are commensurate with established network security best practices and standards or an established risk management framework. By March 31, 2025, support recipients under § 54.1516 shall file their second network security report, covering the time period between August 31, 2023, and March 1, 2025, that identifies and explains the network security controls implemented, their effectiveness in fending off cybersecurity attacks and how those controls are commensurate with established network security best practices and standards or an established risk management framework.

[88 FR 29000, May 5, 2023]
---

EXHIBIT 31(b)

|CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
      PURSUANT                    
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|TO RULE 13a-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
      ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AS
|ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    

I, Susan Liu, chief financial officer of Hendrx
  Corp. (Registrant) certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form
  10-QSB (Report) of Registrant;

2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not
  contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
  fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
  which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
  by this Report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,
  and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all
  material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
  of the Registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this Report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining
  disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
  and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
  or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision,
  to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its
  consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
  particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's
  disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions
  about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
  end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the
  Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
  the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal
  quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
  reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control
  over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation,
  to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of
  directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
  in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which
  are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record,
  process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
  management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's
  internal controls over financial reporting.

|Date: August 13, 2007   | 
|----------------------- | 
|                        | 
|                        | 
|s/s
      Susan Liu     | 
|Susan Liu               | 
|Chief Financial Officer | 

---
#### A. D. Amerise, *Appellant,*vs. J. H. Therrell, as Liquidator of the Bank of Bay Biscayne, *Appellee.*

143 So. 759.

Division B.

Decision filed August 31, 1932.

*Howard W. McCa/y,*for Appellant;

W. *Robert Snwth*and *John J. Lindsey,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript o'f the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court fthat there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell anl Davis, J.J., concur.
376A15

#### Paramount Rx, Inc. v. Robert E. Duggan and Agelity, Inc.

1. Pit’s Joint Motion to Lift Stay

1. Allowed 04/01/2016

2. Pit’s Joint Motion to Dismiss Appeal

2. Allowed 04/01/2016
Intellectual Property Security Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.20 
 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT 
 THIS INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT is entered into as of June 21, 2005 by and between UNITED COMMERCIAL BANK
(“Bank”) and INFINERA CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (“Grantor”). 
 RECITALS 
 Grantor and Bank are parties to that certain Loan and Security Agreement of
even date (as amended from time to time, the “Loan Agreement”). Capitalized terms used herein have the meaning assigned in the Loan Agreement. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, Grantor agrees as follows: 
 AGREEMENT 
 To secure performance of Grantor’s obligations under the Loan Agreement, Grantor grants to
Bank a security interest in all of Grantor’s right, title and interest in Grantor’s intellectual property (including without limitation those Copyrights, Patents and Trademarks listed on Schedules A, B and C hereto), including without
limitation all proceeds thereof (such as, by way of example but not by way of limitation, license royalties and proceeds of infringement suits). This security interest is granted in conjunction with the security interest granted to Bank in the Loan
Agreement. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this
Intellectual Property Security Agreement to be duly executed as of the first date written above. 
  

					
	Address of Borrower:	 	INFINERA CORPORATION
			
	1322 Bordeaux Drive	 	By:	 	 /s/ W. R. Zerella

	Sunnyvale, CA 94089	 		 	
		 	Title:	 	 CFO

	Attn: Bill Zerella, Chief Financial Officer	 		 	
		
	Address of Bank:	 	UNITED COMMERCIAL BANK
			
	5201 Great American Parkway, Suite 300	 	By:	 	 [illegible]

	Santa Clara, CA 95054	 		 	
	Attn: Johnny Lee	 	Title:	 	 VP
126 STAT. 1424 PUBLIC LAW 112–184—OCT. 5, 2012 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3556: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 112–456 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 158 (2012): 

July 23, considered and passed House. 

Sept. 21, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 112–184 

112th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the new United States courthouse in Buffalo, New York, as the 

‘‘Robert H. Jackson United States Courthouse’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

The United States courthouse at 2 Niagara Square, Buffalo, 

New York shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Robert H. Jackson 

United States Courthouse’’. 

SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, 

or other record of the United States to the United States courthouse 

referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the 

‘‘Robert H. Jackson United States Courthouse’’. 

Approved October 5, 2012. 

Oct. 5, 2012 

[H.R. 3556] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
[Civ. No. 2513.

Second Appellate District.

March 22, 1918.].

#### SARAH A. BRANDES, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY, Respondent.

Contempt—Service op Order Essential.—An order adjudging a party in contempt for failure t'o comply with the terms of an interlocutory decree of divorce is erroneous where a copy of the decree was not served upon such party.

APPLICATION for a Writ of Review originally made to the District Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District to annul an order of contempt.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

B. F. Thomas, for Petitioner.

Thompson & Robertson, and Robert M. Clarke, for Respondent.

WORKS, J., *pro*tem.

The petitioner was granted a divorce from her husband, H. L. Brandes. The interlocutory decree was, in part, to the effect that Brandes should make certain conveyances of real and personal property to petitioner, and that, “at the time of the execution and delivery” of such conveyances, the petitioner should deliver to a certain bank a certain sheriff’s certificate of sale held by her. Upon the allegation that he had himself complied with the decree, Brandes initiated a proceeding for contempt of court against petitioner on the ground that she had not delivered up the certificate of sale. In the affidavit which instituted the proceeding, Brandes averred that a copy of the decree had been served on petitioner and that demand had been made upon her to comply with its terms. In an answering affidavit, petitioner alleged that the decree was never served upon her and that no demand had ever been made that she deliver up the certificate of sale. Upon the issues thus framed the trial court found with the petitioner, but, nevertheless, it made its order adjudging her guilty of contempt. It is this order which is sought to be annulled in the present proceeding.

*568The action of the trial court was erroneous. “Before a party can be brought into contempt for not complying with an order of court, such order must be served upon him.” *(Hennessy*v. *Nicol,*105 Cal. 138, 142, [38 Pac. 649, 650].) The order is annulled.

Conrey, P. J., and James, J., concurred.
# Dr. Cathy Downes Recognized as Educational Innovator

/ Published July 19, 2013

The NDU iCollege is pleased to announce that Professor Cathy Downes has        just been chosen as one of the selected "50 Educational Innovators" to        be featured in the 2013  Center for Digital Education Yearbook.   Each        year the Center for Digital Education produces this book to feature top        educational technology and spending trends and highlights 50 selected      innovators in education.

 Cathy's work and e-learning innovations will be documented in the        yearbook, and this will also be great outreach for the NDU iCollege.        When the yearbook is released, we will be sure to let everyone know.  It        is expected later this year.Please join us in congratulating Cathy on this wonderful recognition!
No. 11-9255.

#### Armstead *v.*Neven, Warden, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
V

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 447

For the relief of Ayo Martins.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. WASHINGTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Ayo Martins.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE STATUS FOR AYO

4 MARTINS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subsection (b), for pur6 poses of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Ayo Mar7 tins shall be considered to have been lawfully admitted to

8 the United States for permanent residence as of the date

9 of the enactment of this Act, upon payment of the required

10 visa fees.

11 (b) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION.—Subsection (a)

12 shall apply only if Ayo Martins applies to the Attorney
2

•HR 447 IH

1 General for permanent residence status pursuant to such

2 subsection within 2 years after the date of the enactment

3 of this Act.

Æ
EXHIBIT 31.1

         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT


<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.1

         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT

I, Angela Du, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of CHINA MOBILITY
SOLUTIONS, INC.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of June 30, 2004; and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

<PAGE>

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  August 20, 2004

/s/ Angela Du
-----------------------
Angela Du, President, CEO
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4452 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4452

To designate the Post Office building at 115 West Chester in Ruleville, 
  Mississippi, as the ``Fannie Lou Hamer United States Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 18, 1994

 Mr. Thompson of Mississippi introduced the following bill; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Post Office building at 115 West Chester in Ruleville, 
  Mississippi, as the ``Fannie Lou Hamer United States Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Post Office building located at 115 West Chester Street in 
Ruleville, Mississippi, shall be known and designated as the ``Fannie 
Lou Hamer United States Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Fannie Lou Hamer United 
States Post Office''.

                                 <all>
```
## NUMBER 13

- 23

- 00 579

- C V

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

THOMAS RHEMAN

, Appellant,

v.

DEBORAH RHEMAN

N/K/A DEBORAH SIBLEY

, Appellee.

ON APPEAL FROM THE 1 03RD DISTRICT COURT

OF CAMERON COUNTY, TEXAS



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Pe ñ a

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Contreras

This cause is before the Court on its own motion. On December 14

, 202 3 , a ppellant

filed a notice of appeal. The clerk’s record was due on January 2 6 , 2024

. On January 25,

2024, this Court notified appellant that unless he made arran ge ments to pay for the clerk’s

record and proof of payment was provided to the Court within ten days, the appeal was2 subject to dismissal for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(b). On January 2 6

,

2024, the district clerk notified the Clerk of the Court that appellant had failed to make

arrangements for payment of the clerk ’ s record

. On February 15 , 2024, the district clerk

again notified the Clerk of the Court that appellant had failed to make arrangements for

payment of the clerk’s record

.

N o clerk’s record has been filed due to appellant’s failure to pay or make payment

arrangements , and a ppellant has failed to comply with a notice from the C lerk of the Court

requiring a response or other action within the time specified; accordingly, the appeal is

dismissed for want of prosecution

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(b)

, 42.3(b), (c).

DORI CONTRERAS

Chief Justice

D elivered and filed on the

2nd day of May, 202 4

.
§ 60-741.66 Sanctions and penalties. ( a ) *Withholding progress payments.* With the prior approval of the Director, so much of the accrued payment due on the contract or any other contract between the Government contractor and the Federal Government may be withheld as necessary to correct any violations of the provisions of the act or this part.
( b ) *Termination.* A contract may be canceled or terminated, in whole or in part, for failure to comply with the provisions of the act or this part.
( c ) *Debarment.* A contractor may be debarred from receiving future contracts for failure to comply with the provisions of the act or this part subject to reinstatement pursuant to § 60-741.68. Debarment may be imposed for an indefinite period, or may be imposed for a fixed period of not less than six months, but no more than three years.
( d ) *Hearing opportunity.* An opportunity for a formal hearing shall be afforded to a contractor before the imposition of any sanction or penalty.