alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"22-1841: GOODNOW v. US [OPINION], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"qQGdXqvA32\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/11-15-2022-22-1841-goodnow-v-us-opinion-22-1841-opinion-11-15-2022_2033467\/\">22-1841: GOODNOW v. US [OPINION], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/11-15-2022-22-1841-goodnow-v-us-opinion-22-1841-opinion-11-15-2022_2033467\/embed\/#?secret=qQGdXqvA32\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“22-1841: GOODNOW v. US [OPINION], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"qQGdXqvA32\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"OPINION Posted: GOODNOW v. US [OPINION](pdf) Appeal Number: 22-1841 Origin: CFC Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
<PAGE>






Exhibit 99.1


                        CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of MIV Therapeutics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months ending August 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Alan P. Lindsay, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.



/S/ Alan P. Lindsay
-------------------
Alan P. Lindsay
President and CEO
October 8, 2003
No. 10-11266.

#### Howard *v.*Michigan.

Sup. Ct. Mich. Certio-rari denied.
#### Armour Fertilizer Works, a corporation, *Appellant,*vs. Manda Burney, Wm. Burney and Jake Burney, *Appellees.*

143 So. 250.

Division B.

Decision filed July 26, 1932.

Petition for rehearing denied August 31, 1932.

*295*Cassells*c& *Tynlde,*for Appellant;

*Zewadshi <& Pierce,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore -been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Davis, J. J., concur.

On Rehearing.

Per Curiam.

In affirming the decree without opinion, the holding was that the injunction granted was properly made perpetual and the sheriff’s deed dated November 10, 1927, was properly vacated, set aside and declared null and void, because the deed in issue was so indefinite as to be void, two defendants being named in the execution whereas the deed only purported to convey the interest of the “defendant” without specification as to the exact interest levied on or intended to be conveyed. This finding was sufficient to require affirmance of the decree, which is conclusive of no other question than the invalidity of the deed attacked and set aside.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J. J., concur.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Stamps.com Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ken McBride, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.





Date:
      August 5, 2010
              /s/ KEN MCBRIDEKen
      McBride
                Chief
      Executive Officer
                (Principal
      Executive Officer)




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

###### Minerals Management Service 

          - 43 CFR Parts 3200 and 3280 
          - [WO-310-06-1310-GEOT] 
          - RIN 1004-AD86 
          - 30 CFR Parts 202, 206, 210, 217,  and 218 
          - [WO-310-06-1310-GEOT] 
          - RIN 1010-AD32 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management and Minerals Management Service, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

A public meeting is being held by the Bureau of Land Management and the Minerals Management Service to receive comments from the public and industry related to the two sets of draft rules that were written in response to the Energy Policy Act of 2005, which mandated comprehensive changes to leasing and royalty policies to encourage geothermal energy use without imposing additional administrative burdens on industry or governmental agencies. 

# DATES:

The meeting date is scheduled as follows: August 31, 2006; 1-4 p.m., Reno, Nevada. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the following location: Reno Hilton Hotel, 2500 East 2nd Street, Reno, Nevada 89595. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kermit Witherbee, National Geothermal Program Lead for the BLM at (202) 452-0385 or Herb Black, Geologist, Solid Minerals and Geothermal Compliance and Asset Management, for MMS at (303) 231-3769. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting will begin with an overview of the revisions proposed by BLM (71 FR 41542, July 21, 2006) and MMS (71 FR 41516, July 21, 2006) to their respective geothermal rules as mandated by the Energy Policy Act. Participants who request to speak will be given a set amount of time to address the proposed rules. 

Philip Allard,

Acting Assistant Director, Minerals, Realty and Resource Protection. 

Lonnie Kimball,

Acting Associate Director for Mineral Revenue, Minerals Management Service. 

[FR Doc. 06-6888 Filed 8-14-06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-84-P
No. 11-5470.

#### Aboutaleb *v.*Elgammal.

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 31.2


                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                         302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT

I, Ernest Cheung, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Xin Net Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  August 19, 2003


/s/ Ernest Cheung
-----------------------
Ernest Cheung, CFO
# National Cyber Director at Cyber Beacon 2021

/ Published Nov. 18, 2021

Chris Inglis, the first National Cyber Director, is a keynote speaker for the 8th annual Cyber Beacon Conference, hosted by the National Defense University's College of Information and Cyberspace on 9 December 2021. Find the full agenda here: https://cic.ndu.edu/cyberbeacon/
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001082816
<NAME> OGLEBAY NORTON COMPANY

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               45,924,857
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,210,000
<INVENTORY>                                 28,941,041
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            87,126,172
<PP&E>                                     542,754,579
<DEPRECIATION>                             211,572,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             537,578,705
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       43,298,918
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,253,332
<OTHER-SE>                                 129,670,571
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               537,578,705
<SALES>                                    153,425,706
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           217,121,834
<CGS>                                      101,686,864
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              144,235,551
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               790,298
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          23,125,306
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             12,996,178
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,704,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          9,292,178
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 9,292,178
<EPS-BASIC>                                      $1.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $1.92


</TABLE>
No. 11-8821.

#### Gass *v.*Tennessee.

Ct. Crim. App. Tenn. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-9412.

#### Johnson *v.*Rock, Superintendent, Upstate Correctional Facility.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-5405.

#### Lane *v.*Doe et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 101.1523 Sharing and coordination among non-government licensees and between non-government and government services. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 33262 , Apr. 29, 2024.
( a ) Registration of each link in the 71-76 GHz, 81-86 GHz, and 92-95 GHz bands will be in the Universal Licensing System until the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau announces by public notice the implementation of a third-party database.
( b ) The licensee or applicant shall: ( 1 ) Complete coordination with Federal Government links according to the coordination standards and procedures adopted in Report and Order, FCC 03-248, and as further detailed in subsequent implementation public notices issued consistent with that order;
( 2 ) Provide an electronic copy of an interference analysis to the third-party database manager which demonstrates that the potential for harmful interference to or from all previously registered non-government links has been analyzed according to the standards of section 101.105 and generally accepted good engineering practice, and that the proposed non-government link will neither cause harmful interference to, nor receive harmful interference from, any previously registered non-government link; and
( 3 ) Provide upon request any information related to the interference analysis and the corresponding link. The third-party database managers shall receive and retain the interference analyses electronically and make them available to the public. Protection of individual links against harmful interference from other links shall be granted to first-in-time registered links. Successful completion of coordination via the NTIA automated mechanism shall constitute successful non-Federal Government to Federal Government coordination for that individual link.
( c ) In addition, the following types of non-Federal Government links require the filing with the Commission an FCC Form 601 for each link for the purpose of coordination and registration, in addition to registering each link in the third-party database: ( 1 ) Facilities requiring the submission of an Environmental Assessment,
( 2 ) Facilities requiring international coordination, and
( 3 ) Operation in quiet zones.
( d ) The Commission believes the licensee is in the best position to determine the nature of its operations and whether those operations impact these settings, and is required to submit to a database manager, as part of the registration package, documentation that an FCC Form 601 has been filed.
[69 FR 3267, Jan. 23, 2004, as amended at 70 FR 29998, May 25, 2005]
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4543 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4543

                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
 the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  four


                                 An Act

  
 
  To designate the United States courthouse to be constructed at 907 
Richland Street in Columbia, South Carolina, as the ``Matthew J. Perry, 
Jr. United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse to be constructed at 907 Richland 
Street in Columbia, South Carolina, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Matthew J. Perry, Jr. United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Matthew J. 
Perry, Jr. United States Courthouse''.







                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.







                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.`
No. 11-890.

#### Bright *v.*Holder, Attorney General.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
SUPREME COURT.

#### The Erie Railway Company and James Fisk, Jr., agt. Marshall B. Champlain and others.

Where a person whose *affidavit*or *deposition*is required to be used on a motion *(Code,*§ 401, *sub.*7) appears before the referee appointed for the purpose of taking such deposition, and is partially examined without objection, it is then too late for him to move to vacate the order appointing the referee, on the ground that he had not refused to make his deposition.

*Otsego Special Term, April,*1868.

Motion by James H. Coleman to set aside an order made at a special term of this court, on the first day of April, 1868, appointing Amasa A. Redfield, Esq., referee to take his deposition, to be used upon a motion in this action to ' suspend Frank Work from his office as director of the Erie *75Railway Company. The order was procured by the plaintiffs, under subdivision 7 of section 401 of the Code. Coleman appeared and was sworn before the i;eferee, in pursuance of the order, and answered some questions that were put to him by the plaintiffs’ counsel. His examination was then stopped by an order staying proceedings, under the order appointing the referee, until he could make this motion to set aside the last mentioned order, on the ground that he never refused to make an affidavit for the plaintiff.

Lewis Seymour, *for plaintiffs.*

Samuel Edick, *for Coleman.*

Balcom, J.

It is unnecessary to decide the question whether the conduct of Coleman was such as to entitle the plaintiffs to an order appointing a referee to take his deposition, pursuant to sectioti 401, subdivision 7, of the Code, if the facts had been fully and particularly presented to the court when the order was granted. He appeared, was sworn and partially examined before the referee, without objection. After doing that, it was too late for Mm to raise the objection that the order was irregularly granted, or to move to have it set aside, on the ground that Ms conduct had not been tantamount to a refusal to make an affidavit for the plaintiffs, to be used upon a motion in the action to suspend Work from Ms office of director of the Erie Railway Company. The question is not presented whether any of the interrogatories put to Coleman were impertinent, and I shall not express an opinion respecting the same.

The motion is denied, with $10 costs to be paid by Coleman to the plaintiffs, on the sole ground that it is made too late.
No. 11-5522.

#### Stokes *v.*Florida.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.
#### § 3.24 Evidence of financial responsibility.

All applicants must provide evidence of sound financial status. To the extent that the applicant is a business, formal financial statements will be required. Other applicants may submit documentation proving all assets, liabilities, income and expenses which supports their ability to meet their personal obligations. Applicants must provide any additional information deemed necessary by the Commission.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA PR 21 - 0001

_________________ JOHN C. OPITZ ,

Petitioner, vs. SHERRIE R. REED ,

Respondent. O R D E R

_________________ John C. Opitz has filed an affidavit in support of his request to disqualify the Honorable Michael F. McMahon from presiding in Cause No. BDR-2010 -248 in the First Judicial District Court, Lewis and Clark County, pursuant to § 3 - 1 - 805, MCA . The bas i s for the affidavit appears to be Opitz’s disagreement with the District Court’s rulings in this matter . However, § 3 - 1 - 805(1)(b), MCA, provides that an affidavit cannot be based solely on rulings in the case which can be addressed on appeal. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to disqualify Judge McMahon is VOID and thereby DENIED. The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to the Clerk of the District Court of Lewis and Clark County for notification to all parties in Cause No. BDR- 2010 -248 , and to the Honorable Michael F. McMahon .

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 30 2021

08/30/2021
Case Number: PR 21-0001
#### § 65.500 Net income.

The net income methodology specified in § 65.450 shall be utilized by all interexchange carriers that are so designated by Commission order.

[60 FR 28546, June 1, 1995]