alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 54.513 Resale and transfer of services. ( a ) *Prohibition on resale.* Eligible supported services provided at a discount under this subpart shall not be sold, resold, or transferred in consideration of money or any other thing of value, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) *Disposal of obsolete equipment components of eligible services.* Eligible equipment components of eligible services purchased at a discount under this subpart shall be considered obsolete if the equipment components have been installed for at least five years, except that Wi-Fi hotspots for off-premises use shall be considered obsolete after three years. Obsolete equipment components of eligible services may be resold or transferred in consideration of money or any other thing of value, disposed of, donated, or traded.
( c ) *Permissible fees.* This prohibition on resale shall not bar schools, school districts, libraries, and library consortia from charging either computer lab fees or fees for classes in how to navigate over the Internet. There is no prohibition on the resale of services that are not purchased pursuant to the discounts provided in this subpart.
( d ) Eligible services and equipment components of eligible services purchased at a discount under this subpart shall not be transferred, with or without consideration of money or any other thing of value, for a period of three years after purchase, except that eligible services and equipment components of eligible services may be transferred to another eligible school or library in the event that the particular location where the service originally was received is permanently or temporarily closed, or is part of the same eligible school district or library system as the location receiving the eligible services or equipment components of eligible services. If an eligible service or equipment component of a service is transferred pursuant to this paragraph, both the transferor and recipient must maintain detailed records documenting the transfer and the reason for the transfer for a period of five years.
[62 FR 32948, June 17, 1997, as amended at 69 FR 6191, Feb. 10, 2004; 75 FR 75415, Dec. 3, 2010; 84 FR 70037, Dec. 20, 2019; 89 FR 67325, Aug. 20, 2024]
S89A0410.

#### BOYCE v. BOYCE.

(388 SE2d 524)

Decided February 22, 1990.

*Day, Royal & Drahos, Keith A. Royal,*for appellant.

*Davis, Matthews & Quigley, Richard W. Schiffman, Jr.,*for appellee.

Per curiam.

We granted an application to appeal to consider whether the trial court erred in dismissing this case under OCGA § 9-10-91 (5). Because the nonresident ex-husband has lived out of state since 1982 and has been in full and complete compliance with the Georgia divorce decree, we hold that the trial court properly dismissed the ex-wife’s action for modification of child support. *Medeiros v. Tarpley,*258 Ga. 372 (369 SE2d 482) (1988).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Hunt, J., who concurs in the judgment only.*
EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Greater Atlantic Financial Corp.
(the "company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David E. Ritter Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

A.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

B.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company
     as of and for the period covered by the Report.





                                           By: /s/ David E. Ritter
                                               -------------------
                                               David E. Ritter
                                               Senior Vice President and
                                               Chief Financial Officer


                                               Date: February 13, 2007
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"Patrick Chesnut","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/chesnutp\/","title":"Release of Materials in Judicial Investigation - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"RbdiNcDDD3\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/release-of-materials-in-judicial-investigation\/\">Release of Materials in Judicial Investigation<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/release-of-materials-in-judicial-investigation\/embed\/#?secret=RbdiNcDDD3\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Release of Materials in Judicial Investigation” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"RbdiNcDDD3\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Pursuant to Judge Newman\u2019s request under Rule 23(b)(7) and pursuant to Rule 23(b)(8), the materials below are being released.  Prior documents in this matter can be found on the court\u2019s website. Neither the Judicial Council, Special Committee, nor the court are providing any additional statements at this time."}
#### Hicks v. The Commonwealth.

June Term, 1850.

Criminal Law—Concealed Weapons—Evidence.—A jury may well find a habitual or general wearing of concealed weapons, from evidence that the defendant was seen once wearing concealed weapons under circumstances which satisfies them it was his general practice. _

At the October term 1847, of the Circuit court of Albemarle county, William R. Hicks, a constable of the county, was indicted for habitually and generally carrying about his person concealed weapons.

On the trial the Commonwealth introduced two witnesses, one of whom proved that on meeting Hicks *in the public road, in order to induce the witness, who was a youth, to surrender to him the horse of his father, which he was riding, and on which Hicks wished to levy an execution, he drew out a pistol and dirk, which had been before concealed about his person. The other witness, though he did not see the defendant have weapons about his person, stated facts from which it might be supposed that the defendant did have weapons concealed about his person at the time of which he spoke.

This being all the evidence, the defendant moved the Court to instruct the jury, that the evidence was insufficient to warrant a verdict of conviction under the law prohibiting the carrying of concealed weapons, passed the 2d day of February 1838. But the Court refused to give the instruction; and told the jury that the law had not prescribed any particular number of times or occasions on which a party must be seen wearing concealed weapons, to constitute the offence of habitually or generally keeping or carrying about his person concealed weapons, and to make a party guilty of a violation of the law; but it was for them to consider whether the evidence was sufficient to constitute a case for conviction. And that under certain circumstances, a jury might well find a habitual or general wearing of concealed weapons, from evidence that he was seen even once wearing of concealed weapons, and much more so, if the evidence in this case should satisfy them of his having been seen wearing them on two different occasions, under circumstances which satisfied them it was his general practice. To the opinion of the Court refusing the instruction asked, and to the instruction given, the defendant excepted.

The jury found the defendant guilty, and assessed his fine at fifty dollars; and the Court rendered a judgment upon the verdict ; whereupon the defendant applied *to this Court for a writ of error, which was allowed.

By the Court.

The judgment is affirmed.

Smith and Lomax, J’s, dissented.
§ 5.79 Transfer and assignment of station authorization for conventional, program, medical testing, Spectrum Horizons, and compliance testing experimental radio licenses. ( a ) A station authorization for a conventional experimental radio license or Spectrum Horizons experimental radio license, the frequencies authorized to be used by the grantee of such authorization, and the rights therein granted by such authorization shall not be transferred, assigned, or in any manner either voluntarily or involuntarily disposed of, unless the Commission decides that such a transfer is in the public interest and gives its consent in writing.
( b ) A station authorization for a program, medical testing, or compliance testing experimental radio license, the frequencies authorized to be used by the grantees of such authorizations, and the rights therein granted by such authorizations shall not be transferred, assigned, or in any manner either voluntarily or involuntarily disposed of.
[78 FR 36679, June 19, 2013, as amended at 84 FR 25690, June 4, 2019]
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2011 - 1093 Directorate Identifier: 2010NM149AD

CMM 27 - 41 - 10, R3 --- 10/2/07

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
Exhibit 32.1



Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350)



The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of the
Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority (the Authority), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, on the date hereof:



| | (a) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Authority for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Authority.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    WILLIAM J.
VELARDOWilliam J. VelardoChief Executive Officer,Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityDecember 21, 2004




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Authority and will be retained by the Authority and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 11-5375.

#### Newsome *v.*Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-1301

JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR., 

 Plaintiff – Appellant, 

 v. 

MARGARET ANN NOLAN, 

 Defendant – Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District 

Judge. (1:08-cv-02969-WDQ) 

Submitted: April 20, 2009 Decided: May 8, 2009 

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Jerome Julius Brown, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Jerome Julius Brown, Sr., seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing his civil action. We dismiss the 

appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was 

not timely filed. 

Parties in a civil case are required to file the 

notice of appeal within thirty days after the judgment or order 

appealed from is entered, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the 

district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 

4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 

4(a)(6). This appeal period is mandatory and jurisdictional. 

Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205 (2007). 

The district court’s order was entered on November 10, 

2008. The notice of appeal was filed on February 18, 2009. See

Fed. R. App. P. 4(d). Because Brown failed to file a timely 

notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the 

appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
# Comments on: 20-1424: COREPHOTONICS, LTD. v. APPLE INC. [OPINION], Nonprecedential
No. 11-1168.

#### Russell Country Sportsmen et al. *v.*United States Forest Service et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**






CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Palomar Enterprises Inc., a Nevada
      corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September
      30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof (the "Report"), I, Brent Fouch, Treasurer, Principal Accounting Officer
      and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






Dated: November
      10, 2006




/s/
      Brent Fouch


By:
      Brent
      Fouch, Treasurer, Principal Accounting Officer and Director
§ 13.1 Basis and purpose. ( a ) *Basis.* The basis for the rules contained in this part is the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and applicable treaties and agreements to which the United States is a party.
( b ) *Purpose.* The purpose of the rules in this part is to prescribe the manner and conditions under which commercial radio operators are licensed by the Commission.
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            College of Information and Cyberspace
                    National Defense University
                CIC
        Search
                    Search CIC:
                        Search
                Search CIC:
                    Search
    Home

    About 
        Mission & Vision

    Faculty & Staff

    Fact Sheet

    Alumni

    Internships

    FAQ

    Admissions 
        Eligibility Requirements

    Admissions Calendar

    Application Instructions

    Apply Online

    International Students

    Academics 
        Graduate Catalog

    M.S. in Strategic Information and Cyberspace Studies
        
        JPME Master's Degree

    Cyber Workforce Master's Degree (Part Time)

    Leadership Development Programs

    Graduate Certificates

    Academic Partners

    Current Students 
        JPME II  Incoming Students

    LDP Incoming Students

    Student Registration

    Bring Your Own Device

    IA Compliance

    Completion Procedures / Order Transcripts

    Student Services and Resources

    Events
    
        Cyber Beacon

    Cyber PME Colloquium

    Hopper Award

    Lecture Series

    CYBERCOM Symposium

    NEWS

    UC2
    
        About

    Events

    Work With Us

    Center for Cybersecurity
    
        About

    Cybersecurity Center POC

    Cybersecurity Supporting Faculty

    CAE-CDE CISO Certificate Program

    Cybersecurity Trending News

    Cyber Labs
        
        Ethical Hacking

    Critical Infrastructure - SCADA

    Cyber Exercises
        
        Tabletop Exercise

    Cyber Competitions

    Cyber Resources and Awareness

    Stakeholder / Industry Advisory Council

    Contact 
        Contact Us

    Directions

    Access to Ft. McNair

    Map of Ft. McNair  Download
 Mr. Noah Stevens Business Support Specialist
 
 
 SHARE
 PRINT
 National Defense University


College of Information and Cyberspace

300 Fifth Ave., Bldg. 62
Fort Lesley J. McNair
Washington, DC 20319-5066

202-685-6300
                    Stay Connected
                About DoD
    News
    Photos & Videos
    Military/DoD WebsitesDoD Inspector General
    Link Disclaimer
    Recovery Act
    FOIA
    USA.gov
    No FEAR ActJoin the Military
    DoD Careers
    Privacy & Security
    Web Policy
    Site Map
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 152 (Tuesday, August 8, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45107-45108]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6745]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request


July 31, 2006.

    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
11000, 1750 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before September 7, 
2006 to be assured of consideration.

Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB)

    OMB Number: 1513-0100.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Applications, Notices, and Relative to Importation and 
Exportation of Distilled Spirits, Wine and Beer, Including Puerto Rico 
and Virgin Islands.
    Description: Beverage alcohol, industrial alcohol, beer and wine 
are taxed when imported. The taxes on these commodities coming from the 
Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico are largely returned to these insular 
possessions. Exports are mainly tax-free. These documents ensure that 
proper taxes are collected and returned according to law.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 180 hours.

    OMB Number: 1513-0097.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Notices Relating to Payment of Firearms and Ammunition 
Excise Tax.
    Description: Excise taxes are collected on the sale or use of 
firearms and ammunition by firearms or ammunition manufacturers, 
importers or producers. Taxpayers who elect to pay excise taxes by 
electronic fund transfer must furnish a written notice upon election 
and discontinuance. Tax revenue will be protected.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 1 hour.
    Clearance Officer: Frank Foote, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade 
Bureau, Room 200 East, 1310 G. Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005. (202) 
927-9347.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt, Office of Management and Budget, 
Room 10235, New Executive Office

[[Page 45108]]

Building, Washington, DC 20503, (202) 395-7316.

Robert Dahl,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 06-6745 Filed 8-7-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P
§ 5.205 Licensing requirements, necessary showing. ( a ) An applicant for a new experimental broadcast station, change in facilities of any existing station, or modification of license is required to make a satisfactory showing of compliance with the general requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, as well as the following: ( 1 ) That the applicant has a definite program of research and experimentation in the technical phases of broadcasting which indicates reasonable promise of substantial contribution to the developments of the broadcasting art.
( 2 ) That upon the authorization of the proposed station the applicant can and will proceed immediately with its program of research and experimentation.
( 3 ) That the transmission of signals by radio is essential to the proposed program of research and experimentation.
( 4 ) That the program of research and experimentation will be conducted by qualified personnel.
( b ) A license for an experimental broadcast station will be issued only on the condition that no objectionable interference to the regular program transmissions of broadcast stations will result from the transmissions of the experimental stations.
( c ) *Special provision for broadcast experimental radio station applications.* For purposes of the definition of “experimental authorization” in Section II.A.6 of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement Regarding the Section 106 National Historic Preservation Act Review Process set forth in Appendix C to Part 1 of this chapter, an Broadcast Experimental Radio Station authorized under this Subpart shall be considered an “Experimental Broadcast Station authorized under part 74 of the Commission's Rules.”
[78 FR 25162, Apr. 29, 2013]