alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
      32.2














**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Palomar Enterprises Inc., a Nevada
      corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006,
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), I, Brent Fouch, Treasurer, Principal Accounting Officer and Director
      of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The Report fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and result of operations of the Company.











Dated:
      August 11,
      2006 /s/     
      Brent Fouch


By: Brent
      Fouch,
      Treasurer, Principal Accounting Officer
      and Director
No. 11-9907.

#### Davies *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
01/03 8-1 Regulation I Puget Sound

Clean Air Agency

pscleanai r .or g

PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR AGENCY

1904 3rd Avenue, Suite 105

Seattle, Washington 98101-3317

(206) 343-8800

REGULATION I

ARTICLE 8: OUTDOOR BURNING

SECTION 8.06 OUTDOOR BURNING OZONE CONTINGENCY MEASURE

Adopted 12/19/02 (976)

(a) Applicability. This section shall apply to open burning within King, Kitsap, 

Pierce, and Snohomish Counties if, in consultation with the Washington State 

Department of Ecology and the Agency, the U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency makes a written finding that:

(1) A quality-assured violation of the national ambient air quality standard for 

ozone has occurred, and

(2) Prevention of future violations can be reasonably addressed through the 

implementation of this section.

The Agency shall provide public notice of this written finding no later than 

November 1. This section shall take effect on July 1 following the public notice of 

such a written finding.

(b) It shall be unlawful for any person to cause or allow outdoor burning within King, 

Kitsap, Pierce, or Snohomish Counties during the months of July through August.
01/03 8-2 Regulation I Puget Sound

Clean Air Agency

pscleanai r .or g

PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR AGENCY

1904 3rd Avenue, Suite 105

Seattle, Washington 98101-3317

(206) 343-8800

REGULATION II

ARTICLE 2: GASOLINE MARKETING EMISSION

STANDARDS

SECTION 2.10 GASOLINE STATION OZONE CONTINGENCY MEASURE 

Adopted 12/19/02 (976)

(a) Applicability. This section shall apply to gasoline stations that use coaxial Stage 

1 vapor recovery systems and dispense 600,000 gallons or more of gasoline per 

year if, in consultation with the Washington State Department of Ecology and the 

Agency, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency makes a written finding that:

(1) A quality-assured violation of the national ambient air quality standard for 

ozone has occurred, and

(2) Prevention of future violations can be reasonably addressed through the 

implementation of this section.

The Agency shall provide public notice of this written finding no later than 

November 1. This section shall take effect on May 1 following the public notice 

of such a written finding.

(b) It shall be unlawful for any person to cause or allow the transfer of gasoline from 

a transport tank into a stationary storage tank unless a California Air Resources 

Board (CARB) Stage I system, approved after July 1, 2002, is installed and 

operated in accordance with CARB system certification requirements.

(c) The systems required in Section 2.10(b) of this regulation shall be installed within 

1 year of the May 1 effective date listed in Section 2.10(a) of this regulation.
No. 11-788.

#### Hijazi *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Byron D. Hewett, Chief Executive Officer of Immunicon Corporation (the Company), hereby certify that:

(1) The Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|                                       
|/s/ Byron D. Hewett                    
|Byron D. Hewett Chief Executive
Officer

May 10, 2007
United States Securities & Exchange Commission EDGAR Filing


Exhibit (10)(Z)(1)

List of Executive Officers who are parties to

Change in Control Agreements with Harleysville Group Inc.

in the form filed as Exhibit (10)(Z) with the Annual Report on Form 10-K

for the year ended December 31, 2006




Michael L. Browne, President and Chief Executive Officer (1)

Mark R. Cummins, Executive Vice President, Chief Investment Officer and Treasurer

Allan R. Becker, Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary

Arthur E. Chandler, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Thomas E. Clark, Senior Vice President, Field Operations 

Donna M. Dever, Senior Vice President, Performance Excellence (2)

Robert A. Kauffman, Senior Vice President, Secretary, General Counsel and Chief Governance Officer

Theodore A. Majewski, Senior Vice President, Personal Lines (3)

Kevin M. Toth, Senior Vice President, Claims

Akhil Tripathi, Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer

Robert G. Whitlock Jr., Senior Vice President & Chief Underwriting Officer




_________________

(1)

Mr. Browne’s agreement is substantially similar to the agreement with other executives except for the following:  (a) the factor in Section 4(c)(ii)(b) is 2.999 instead of 2.000; (b) the period in (i) the last proviso to Section 1, (ii) the lead-in paragraph to Section 3, (iii) the lead-in paragraph to Section 3(c), and (iv) Section 4(c)(vii) is thirty-six (36) months instead of twenty-four months; (c) the Initial Expiration Date is December 31, 2009, instead of December 31, 2007; and (d) in Section 1, the date January 1, 2008 is January 1, 2010.




(2)

The Company entered into this agreement in February 2007.




(3)

Mr. Majewski’s agreement has the following differences:  (a) the factor in Section 4(c)(ii)(b) is 1.000 instead of 2.000; and (b) the period in (i) the last proviso to Section 1, (ii) the lead-in paragraph to Section 3, (iii) the lead-in paragraph to Section 3(c), and (iv) Section 4(c)(vii) is twelve (12) months instead of twenty-four months.  The agreement also provided for a continuation in salary and benefits for twelve months following any termination of his employment by the Company, other than for cause, occurring prior to December 31, 2006, unless a change in control had previously occurred.
No. 11-5639.

#### Edgar *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certio-rari denied.
No. 10-10757.

#### Hefley *v.*Delaware.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 99.2

   TechLabs Announces Letter of Intent to Acquire Anti-Aging Center in Florida

KNOXVILLE, Tenn., Aug. 6 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- TechLabs, Inc. (OTC Bulletin
Board: TELA) announced today that as part of its newly adopted business plan, it
has signed a letter of intent to purchase the outstanding stock of Florida
Fountain of Youth, Inc. and Florida Fountain of Youth Spas, Inc. The privately
owned companies are headquartered in Stuart, Florida. Terms of the transaction
were not disclosed; however the company anticipates that the transaction will be
consummated at the end of August. The transaction is subject to the completion
of satisfactory due diligence on the part of TechLabs with respect to both
companies.

The Florida Fountain of Youth, Inc. and Florida Fountain of Youth Spas, Inc. are
part of a 3,100 s.f. Anti-Aging Spa waterfront facility located on the Treasure
Coast of Florida. The facility specializes in hormone replacement therapies,
electro-magnetic therapy, and sexual enhancement therapies under medical
supervision. Additionally, the center's facility has a complete cosmetic and
therapeutic health spa.

Previously, TechLabs announced that as part of the adoption of a new business
plan and growth strategy, its Board of Directors approved changing the corporate
name to Siren International Corp. The company will provide supplemental
information regarding the name change closer to the effective date of the name
change, including the new ticker symbol and CUSIP number. Until the name change
is effective, TechLabs' common stock will continue to trade under the current
symbol.

About TechLabs

TechLabs is a developer of emerging businesses. While the Company may continue
to operate certain of its current business units, its primary focus will be
centered on exploring opportunities in the leisure, health and nutritional spa
business and micro-resort segment of the hospitality industry.

This press release contains forward-looking statements, some of which may relate
to TechLabs, Inc. and which involve numerous risks and uncertainties. Actual
results, performance or achievements could differ materially from those
anticipated in such forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors,
including those set forth in TechLabs, Inc.'s filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
exv10w47



 





Exhibit 10.47




AMENDMENT NUMBER 1

TO THE

PURCHASE AGREEMENT’

BETWEEN

TRITON PCS EQUIPMENT COMPANY, LLC

AND

NORTEL NETWORKS INC.



Made as of the 16th day of May, 2005 (“Amendment 1 Effective Date”) by and between
SunCom Wireless Operating Company, LLC (“SunCom”) with offices located at 1100 Cassatt Road,
Berwyn, PA 19312, and Nortel Networks Inc. (“Nortel”), with offices located at 2221 Lakeside
Boulevard, Richardson, Texas 75082.



WHEREAS,
Triton PCS Equipment Company LLC (“Triton PCS”) and Nortel entered into a purchase
agreement dated May 16, 2002 for the purchase and license of Products and Services (“Purchase and
License Agreement”), including a Services Supplement and a GSM/GPRS Product Supplement dated May
16, 2002 (each a “Supplement”) (collectively, the “Agreement”); and



WHEREAS,
Triton PCS, with the agreement and approval of Nortel, has assigned all rights, title and
interest in the Agreement to its affiliate, SunCom; and



WHEREAS, the Agreement expired effective May 16, 2005; and



WHEREAS, SunCom and Nortel now wish to reinstate the Agreement and extend the term of the
Agreement, inclusive of the Supplements.



NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants and agreements herein set
forth, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree to
amend the Agreement as follows:





	 	1.	 	Unless otherwise defined, capitalized terms herein shall have the same meaning as in
the Agreement.
	 
	 	2.	 	The Purchase and License Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the last sentence of
the first paragraph in its entirety and replacing it with the following:






	 	 	 	“Unless otherwise terminated in accordance with the terms hereof, this
Agreement will commence on the last date signed and terminate five (5)
years therefrom.”




 









 












	 	3.	 	The GSM/GPRS Product Supplement is hereby amended by deleting Section 1 (TERM) in its
entirety and replacing it with the following:






	 	 	 	“Unless otherwise terminated in accordance with the terms hereof, this
Supplement will commence on 05/16/2002 and terminate five (5) years
therefrom.” (“Term”).”






	 	4.	 	The Agreement, as emended by this Amendment No. 1, shall constitute the entire
agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter of the Agreement, and
shall not be modified or amended except in writing and signed by authorized representatives
of both parties. Except as otherwise expressly amended hereby, the Agreement continues in
full force and effect and is hereby reaffirmed by the parties.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. 1 to be executed by their
duly authorized representatives.




	 	 	 
	NORTEL NETWORKS INC.	 	
SUNCOM WIRELESS OPERATING

COMPANY, LLC by SUNCOM WIRELESS

MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC., its manager
	By:     /s/ R.K. Dodd
 
	 	
By:     /s/ David D. Clark
 

	Name:     Randy K. Dodd
 
	 	
Name:     David D. Clark
 

	Title:     President NA Carrier Sales
 
	 	
Title:     EVP and CFO
 

	Date:     June 21, 2005
 
	 	
Date:     June 10, 2005
Robert A. Wirick

Managing Director Regulatory an d International Affairs

4333 Amon Carter Blvd. MD 5635 Ft. Worth, TX 76155

817

- 96 3

- 0394 Office

817

- 967

- 3179 Fax robert.wirick@aa.com A ugust 13 , 2014

Kevin D. Schlemmer Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis Division U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Docket DOT

- OST

- 1996

- 1167, EAS at Ft. Leonard Wood, MO

Dear M r . DeVany

,

American Airlines , Inc. (“American Airlines”) enthusiastically supports the proposal of Hyannis Air Service, Inc. dba Cape Air to continue providing Essential
Air Service for Ft. Leonard Wood, Missouri with the American Airlines codeshare, providing to the Ft. Leonard Wood community seamless booking and travel on

American Airlines’ worldwide network.

American Airlines Group (NASDAQ: AAL) is the holding company for American Airlines and US Airways , Inc. Together with wholly owned and third

party regional carriers operating as American Eagle and US Airways Express, the airlines operate an average of nearly 6,700 flights per day to 339 destinations in 54 countries from its hubs in Charlotte, Chicago, Dallas/Fort Worth, Los Angeles, Miami, New York, Philadelphia, Phoenix and W ashington, D.C. The American Airlines AAdvantage and US Airways Dividend Miles programs allow members to earn miles for travel, vacation packages, car rentals, hotel stays and everyday purchases. American is a founding member of the one world alliance, whos e
members and members

- elect serve nearly 1,000 destinations with 14,250 daily flights to 150 countries.

Thank you for your kind consideration.

Sincerely,
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4524 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4524

 To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the Old Spanish 
 Trail and the Northern Branch of the Old Spanish Trail for potential 
   inclusion into the National Trails System, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 26, 1994

 Mr. McInnis introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the Old Spanish 
 Trail and the Northern Branch of the Old Spanish Trail for potential 
   inclusion into the National Trails System, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 1244(c)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(36) Old Spanish Trail, beginning in Santa Fe, New Mexico, 
proceeding through Colorado and ending in Los Angeles, California; and 
the Northern Branch of the Old Spanish Trail, beginning near Espanola, 
New Mexico, proceeding through Colorado, and ending near Crescent 
Junction, Utah.''.

                                 <all>
```
No. 11-9507.

#### In re Sekendur.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
No. 11-5658.

#### Creech *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Exhibit 99.2




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Scientific Energy, Inc on Form 10-QSB
for the period  ending  September  30, 2002,  as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jana Meyers, Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

                    (1) the  Report  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
               Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934;
               and

                    (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
               in all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
               operations of the Company.



/s/ Jana Meyer
Jana Meyer
Secretary/Treasurer and Director
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
November 13, 2002
**         Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF **

**THE      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

**(SUBSECTIONS      (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, **
**CHAPTER      63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)**

|                                 |                                                                                                                                                                                       |                                           |
|--------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
|                                 | **China              Mobility Solutions, Inc.**                                                                                                                                            |
|                            |                                                                                                                                                                                  |                                      |
| Date: May              22, 2007 | By:                                                                                                                                                                              | /s/ Xiao-qing              Du   |
|                                 | Xiao-qing                Du                                                                                                                                                                |
|                                 | Title President,              Chairman of the Board, and  Chief              Executive Officer (Principal Executive              Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)  |
No. 11-5464.

#### Combs *v.*Swarthout, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.1302 Cross-reference; Regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality.

A further explanation regarding implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act is provided by the regulations issued by the Council on Environmental Quality, 40 CFR 1500-1508.28.
Argued and submitted July 7,

reversed and remanded with instructions August 10, 1994

#### DEPARTMENT OF LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT, *Respondent, v.*CITY OF DONALD and Fargo Interchange Service District, *Petitioners, and*MARION COUNTY, *Intervenor below.*

(LUBA 93-227; CA A84280)

879 P2d 229

Thomas J. Rastetter argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner City of Donald.

Edward J. Sullivan and Jane Ellen Stonecipher argued the cause for petitioner Fargo Interchange Service District. With them on the brief was Timothy J. Sercombe.

*469John T. Bagg, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Haselton, Judges.

DEITS, P. J.

*470DEITS, P. J.

In *Dept. of Land Conservation v. Fargo Interchange,*129 Or App 447, 879 P2d 224 (1994), we reversed LUBA’s remands of the service district’s decision proposing a sewer system for its area, and Marion County’s decision that the ¿strict’s proposal complied with the county’s acknowledged comprehensive plan and land use regulations. LUBA reasoned that a provision in the county’s plan was intended to implement Goals 11 and 14. Therefore, according to LUBA, the county’s interpretation that the proposal complied with the provision was subject to review for consistency with the goals under ORS 197.829(4). LUBA then concluded that the use of the City of Donald’s treatment facility as part of the proposed system would violate Goals 11 and 14, and the county’s interpretation of the plan provision was, therefore, contrary to those goals and reversible under ORS 197.829(4). We assumed *arguendo*that LUBA was correct that Goals 11 and 14 apply to the decisions in the way LUBA applied them, but disagreed with LUBA’s ultimate conclusion that the proposed sewer system and the county’s interpretation of its plan provision were contrary to those goals.

In the present case, the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) appealed to LUBA from the city’s decision to enter into an agreement with the district to provide the treatment service. LUBA followed the same reasoning it had applied in *Dept. of Land Conservation v. Fargo Interchange, supra,*again reached the question of whether the decision complied with Goals 11 and 14, and again concluded that the goals were violated. Consequently, it remanded the city’s decision. For the reasons stated in *Dept. of Land Conservation v. Fargo Interchange, supra,*we conclude that no goal violation will result from the use allowed by the city’s decision, and we again reverse.1

Reversed and remanded with instructions to affirm city’s decision.

1

 We again assume for discussion only the correctness of LUBA’s reaching the goal compliance question and the reasoning by which it arrived at that question.