alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Base Salaries for Named Executive Officers of C&F Financial Corporation



 EXHIBIT 10.15 
 BASE SALARIES FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS 
 OF 
 C&F FINANCIAL CORPORATION 
 The
following are the base salaries (on an annual basis) in effect as of January 1, 2007 of the named executive officers of C&F Financial Corporation: 
  

					
	Larry G. Dillon	  	$238,000	  	
	 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
	  		  	
			
	Thomas F. Cherry	  	$175,000	  	
	 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	  		  	
			
	Robert L. Bryant	  	$175,000	  	
	 Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
	  		  	
			
	Bryan E. McKernon	  	$195,000	  	
	 President and Chief Executive Officer of C&F Mortgage Corporation
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 09161**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket** **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 09161\09161_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09161\09161_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 09161\09161_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 09161\09161_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09161\09161_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09161\09161_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09161\09161_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09161\09161_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09161\AEP AM 09161 Cont. Tables A-4 & A-5.xls Plant submitted survey file

09161\Certification Statement Plant ID 09161.pdf Plant certification statement 09161\Supplemental Documents\09161_A5-2 Aerial MAP-2 (Quarrier).pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x x 09161\Supplemental Documents\09161_A5-2 MAP-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x x 09161\Supplemental Documents\09161_A5-2 MAP-4.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x x 09161\Supplemental Documents\09161_A5-2 MAP-5.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09161\Supplemental Documents\09161_A5-3 Quarrier Flow Diagram, WB-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09161\Supplemental Documents\09161_A5-3 Water Balance, Diagram WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x x 09161\Supplemental Documents\09161_D2-3 EPRI Rprt 1008820 CBI.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x x 09161\Supplemental Documents\09161_D2-3 EPRI Rprt 1013035 CBI.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x x 09161\Supplemental Documents\09161_D2-3 EPRI Rprt 1020365 CBI.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09161\Supplemental Documents\09161_D2-3 FGD WW Study Excerpt CBI.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09161\Supplemental Documents\09161_D2-3 FGD WW Study Sec 5 CBI.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09161\Supplemental Documents\09161_D2-3 FGD WW Study Tier 2 CBI.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09161\Supplemental Documents\09161_D3-1 Diagram D-1, POND-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09161\Supplemental Documents\09161_D3-1 Diagram WWT-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09161\Supplemental Documents\09161_D5-10 Bid Proposal Exhibit B Attachment_CBI.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09161\Supplemental Documents\09161_ELGs ICR submittal letter 10-13-10.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 09161\Supplemental Documents\AEP AM 09161 A5-2 MAP-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in theSteam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 7, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-41386

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

OHARA LINEAR LAWS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. G-02-CR-8-ALL

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, BENAVIDES and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The appointed appellate attorney for defendant-appellant Ohara

Linear Laws has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief

in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Laws

has filed response briefs to counsel’s motion.

An independent review of the record reflects that there are no

nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Laws’s claim that his former trial

counsel rendered ineffective assistance of counsel with regard to
No. 03-41386

-2-

his guilty plea and waiver of his right to appeal is adequately

developed, but not supported by the record.

Accordingly, Laws’s motion for access to sealed documents in

the record and his motion to proceed pro se on appeal are DENIED.

See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).

Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED and counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein; and this appeal is

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
§ 64.1903 Obligations of all incumbent independent local exchange carriers. ( a ) An incumbent independent LEC providing in-region, interstate, interexchange services or in-region international interexchange services shall provide such services through an affiliate that satisfies the following requirements: ( 1 ) The affiliate shall maintain separate books of account from its affiliated exchange companies. Nothing in this section requires the affiliate to maintain separate books of account that comply with part 32 of this title;
( 2 ) The affiliate shall not jointly own transmission or switching facilities with its affiliated exchange companies. Nothing in this section prohibits an affiliate from sharing personnel or other resources or assets with an affiliated exchange company; and
( 3 ) The affiliate shall acquire any services from its affiliated exchange companies for which the affiliated exchange companies are required to file a tariff at tariffed rates, terms, and conditions. Nothing in this section shall prohibit the affiliate from acquiring any unbundled network elements or exchange services for the provision of a telecommunications service from its affiliated exchange companies, subject to the same terms and conditions as provided in an agreement approved under section 252 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.
( b ) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the affiliate required in paragraph (a) of this section shall be a separate legal entity from its affiliated exchange companies. The affiliate may be staffed by personnel of its affiliated exchange companies, housed in existing offices of its affiliated exchange companies, and use its affiliated exchange companies' marketing and other services, subject to paragraph (a)(3) of this section. ( 1 ) For an incumbent independent LEC that provides in-region, interstate domestic interexchange services or in-region international interexchange services using no interexchange switching or transmission facilities or capability of the LEC's own (i.e., “independent LEC reseller,”) the affiliate required in paragraph (a) of this section may be a separate corporate division of such incumbent independent LEC. All other provisions of this Subpart applicable to an independent LEC affiliate shall continue to apply, as applicable, to such separate corporate division.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
[64 FR 44425, Aug. 16, 1999, as amended at 71 FR 65751, Nov. 9, 2006]
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**








CERTIFICATION
      OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I,
        Angela
        Du, Chief Executive Officer of China Mobility Solutions, Inc., certify
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as enacted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
        the
        Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March
        31,
        2006 (the "Periodic Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies
        with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of China Mobility
        Solutions, Inc.













Dated: July
              24,
              2006
            /s/
              Xiao-qing DuXiao-qing
                Du,
              Chief
                Executive Officer













A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to China Mobility Solutions, Inc. and will
      be
      retained by China Mobility Solutions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit








Exhibit 4.1.1
OFFICERS’ CERTIFICATE
 OF
 TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC.
     The undersigned, James Perry, does hereby certify that he is the Vice President and Treasurer of Trinity Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “ Company ”), and the undersigned, Chas Michel, does hereby certify that he is the Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, and pursuant to Section 12.2 of the Indenture (the “ Indenture ,” with capitalized terms used in the Officers’ Certificate, as defined in the Indenture), between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (the “ Trustee ”), dated as of June 7, 2006, relating to the Company’s 3 7/8% Convertible Subordinated Notes Due 2036 (the “ Notes ”), do hereby certify that:
     1. On May 15, 2006 the Company declared a 3-for-2 stock split in the form of a stock dividend (the “Stock Dividend ”) to holders of record of the Company’s common stock (the “ Common Stock ”) as of May 26, 2006. As a result of the Stock Dividend, each holder of two shares of the Common Stock received one additional share of Common Stock as of the distribution date on June 9, 2006. The ex-dividend date for the Stock Dividend was June 12, 2006.
     2. The initial Conversion Rate was 12.7648 and the initial Conversion Price under the Indenture was $78.34. Immediately after 9:00 a.m., New York City time, on June 13, 2006 (subject to further adjustment as provided in the Indenture), the Conversion Rate is 19.1472 and the Conversion Price is $52.23, calculated in accordance with Section 12.2(a) of the Indenture (collectively, the “ Conversion Rate Adjustment ”).
     3. Such officers have read the provisions of the Indenture applicable to the Conversion Rate Adjustment, including, without limitation, Section 12.2 thereof.
     4. The statements or opinions contained in this certificate are based on the undersigned’s review of the Indenture and certain other corporate documents and records.
     5. We are of the opinion that we have made such examination or investigation as is necessary to enable us to express an informed opinion that the Conversion Rate Adjustment is permitted by the Indenture and whether or not the conditions precedent to Conversion Rate Adjustment have been complied with.
     6. We are of the opinion that Conversion Rate Adjustment is permitted under the Indenture and that upon mailing a notice thereof to the holders of the Notes in accordance with the Indenture, all conditions precedent provided for in the Indenture relating to the Conversion Rate Adjustment have been complied with.
*******
 










 
  











   IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Officers’ Certificate as of this ___ day of June, 2006.
	
					
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	/s/ James E. Perry
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	Name: James Perry
	 
	 

	 
	 
	Title: Vice President and Treasurer
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	/s/ Chas Michel
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	Name: Chas Michel
	 
	 

	 
	 
	Title: Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
EPA Carbon Pollution Hearing Thursday, May 241h 2012 Testimony- Bob Bingaman, Sierra Club Good afternoon. Myname is Bob Bingaman and I am the National Organizing Director for the Sierra Club.
I wanted to speak today on why the Sierra Club supports the Environmental Protection Agency's tirst-evcr carbon pollution standards for new powerplants and how this will benefit the American people.
The science and data beforeus in conclusive: Scientists tell us that climate change is real, it is happening, and it presents some very real threats to ourhealth and societal wellbeing. Fueled by carbon pollution, doctors and nurses tell us that as the temperature rises, so will the instances ofsmog-induced asthma and respiratory illness.
As part ofmyjobwith SierraClub, Itravel regularly, meeting with environmental organizers all across the country. I see tirst-hand the detrimental health effects that carbon pollution and otherdangerous pollutants from coal-tired powerplants pose to communities. Tens ofthousands ofpeople from Virginia to Nevada, to right here in Illinois, suffer from the real, and sometimes fatal, consequences ofpower plants not bearingresponsibility for the pollutionthey spew out. This not only devastates families, but it also increases the burden on our already strapped health serviceprograms. Additionally, a warmer world will mean more extreme weather, causing damage via wildtires to ourhomes and national lands, reduced crop yields and water shortages, an increase in insect pests and prevalence ofinsect spread diseases, and intensified precipitation events such as hurricanes, storm surges and flooding. This will cost us lives and livelihoods, and also hurt our economic recoveryby costing billions ofdollars in damages. Thankfully, the EPA is moving forward and taking steps to hold polluters accountable for the industrial carbon pollution they spew into our air. Beforethese standards, there were no national limits on the amount ofcarbon pollution a plant could emit. These standards notonlyrepresent the end ofan era in whichbig polluters are given a free pass to poison our communities, they also represent a new beginning for American innovation and energyproduction. Bytaking steps to modernize ourenergy fleet, the Obama Administration is continuingthe momentum toward a clean energy future.
In closing, I want to thank EPA for their efforts to protect public health, protect our planet, and spur 21st-century innovation and modernization ofour energyfleet. Iurge EPA to move forward quickly with this critically important standard. Thank you.
253P15

#### State v. Artie Stevenson Smith, Jr.

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA14-1314)

Denied
Department of Employment Security

No. 82-086

#### Appeal of Bryon Miller (New Hampshire Department of Employment Security)

December 8, 1982

*Brown & Nixon P.A.,*of Manchester *(Michael P. Hall*and *Leslie C. Nixon*on the brief, and *Ms. Nixon*orally), for Bryon Miller.

*Gregory H. Smith,*attorney general *(Daniel J. Mullen,*attorney, on the brief and orally), for the State.

*994Memorandum Opinion

Bryon Miller seeks reversal of a denial of unemployment compensation benefits by the department of employment security’s appellate division because of work-connected misconduct within the meaning of RSA 282-A:32, 1(b) (Supp. 1981) (formerly RSA 282:4 A(2)). Miller began working for Prevue Products in 1979 and on at least three occasions received reprimands and suspensions for various reasons relating to safety-procedure infractions. The fourth incident leading to his discharge occurred when he allegedly jumped off a loading dock despite orders not to do so.

 An unemployment compensation system is predicated upon benefits being paid to those who become unemployed through no fault of their own. No compensation is to be paid to one who is terminated because of “misconduct connected with his work.” RSA 282-A:32, 1(b) (Supp. 1981). Isolated or inadvertent instances of unsatisfactory conduct are not sufficient for a finding of “misconduct,” but recurring careless or negligent acts are enough to constitute “misconduct.” *See Boynton Cab Co. v. Neubeck,*237 Wis. 249, 259-60, 296 N.W. 636, 640 (1941). Safety in the workplace is not only a legal requirement but a sound social policy for employer and employee alike. *See Cloutier v. A. & P. Tea Co., Inc.,*121 N.H. 915, 923, 436 A.2d 1140, 1144-45 (1981).

Review of the evidence does not reveal that the appellate division’s conclusion was “clearly erroneous,” and therefore we uphold its decision. RSA 282-A:67, IV(d) (Supp. 1981). *But see Smith v. Adams,*118 N.H. 48, 51, 382 A.2d 362, 365 (1978).

*Affirmed.*

King, C.J., did not sit.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of ArthroCare Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

1. The accompanying annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |     |  |                                                              
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 18, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/    Todd Newton                                           
|                        |  |     |  | Todd Newton Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before of
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
B R A D C L A W S O N

4 0 5 4 W A q u a r i u s C i r

K e a r n s

, U T 8 4 1 1 8

P u r s u a n t t o S e c t i o n 3 3 3 o f t h e F A A M o d e r n i z a t i o n a n d R e f

o r m A c t ( " F M R A " ) a n d 1 4 C

. F

. R

. p a r t

1 1

, N o s w a l c S t u d i o s h e r e b y p e t i t i o n s t h e F e d e r a l A v i a t i o n A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ( " F A A " ) f o r e x e m p t i o n

f r o m 1 4 C

. F

. R

. § § 6 1

. 2 3 ( a ) a n d ( c )

, 6 1

. 1 0 1 ( e ) ( 4 ) a n d ( 5 )

, 6 1

. 1 1 3 ( a )

, 6 1

. 3 1 5 ( a )

, 9 1

. 7 ( a )

, 9 1

. 1 1 9 ( c )

, 9 1

. 1 2 1

, 9 1

. 1 5 l ( a ) ( l )

, 9 1

. 4 0 5 ( a )

, 9 1

. 4 0 7 ( a ) ( l )

, 9 1

. 4 0 9 ( a ) ( l ) a n d ( 2 )

, a n d 9 1

. 4 1 7 ( a ) a n d

( b )

, a n d a n y o t h e r r u l e s t h e F A A d e e m s n e c e s s a r y

, t o e n a b l e N o s w a l c S t u d i o s t o o p e r a t e

u n m a n n e d a i r c r a f

t s y s t e m s ( " U A S " ) f

o r a e r i a l p h o t o g r a p h y & v i d e o g r a p h y

. S p e c i f i c a l l y

, N o s w a l c

S t u d i o s s e e k s t o o p e r a t e U A S f o r a e r i a l p h o t o g r a p h y & v i d e o g r a p h y w h i c h i n c l u d e s r e a l e s t a t e

,

l a n d s u r v e y i n g

, a n d r e c r e a t i o n a l e v e n t s u s i n g t h e B l a d e 3 5 0 Q X 3 a n d B J C 4

. B e c a u s e t h i s

p e t i t i o n i s s i m i l a r i n a l l m a t e r i a l r e s p e c t s t o p r e v i o u s l y

­ g r a n t e d S e c t i o n 3 3 3 p e t i t i o n s

, N o s w a l c

S t u d i o s r e q u e s t s e x p e d i t e d a p p r o v a l p u r s u a n t t o t h e F A A ' s s u m m a r y g r a n t p r o c e s s

.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"Patrick Chesnut","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/chesnutp\/","title":"Notice of Court Closure on November 25, 2022 - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"FXWrY12dzI\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/notice-of-court-closure-on-november-25-2022\/\">Notice of Court Closure on November 25, 2022<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/notice-of-court-closure-on-november-25-2022\/embed\/#?secret=FXWrY12dzI\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Notice of Court Closure on November 25, 2022” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"FXWrY12dzI\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit will be closed on Friday, November 25, 2022, in addition to the federal holiday of Thursday, November 24, 2022. For purposes of computation of time and motions to enlarge time under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure and Federal Circuit Rule 26, November 25, 2022, will […]"}
No. 11-5201.

#### Pitts *v.*Davis, Warden.

C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### § 5.503 Scope of testing activities.

The authority of a compliance testing experimental license is limited to only those testing activities necessary for device certification (including antenna calibration, test site validation, proficiency testing, and testing in an Open Area Test Site); *i.e.,* compliance testing experimental licensees are not authorized to conduct immunity testing.