alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.14

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Xin Net Corp. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB  for the year  ending  March 31,  2003 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").  I, Ernest Cheung,  Chief
Financial Officer of the company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sction 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                                /s/ Ernest Cheung
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Ernest Cheung, CFO

Dated:  5/20/03
FCR- RVO deleted the Specification 01580 10/13/99 10/14/99 Approved None Required

MNSL- requirement that x Project Signage 021 project

identification

signs be popteýd

at each site

underthe

Miscellaneous

i Northern

Southern Tier

Soils and Lake

Sediments

Remediation

Projects

FCR- Subcontractor E1409-205-Cl 15 10120/99 10127/99 Approved EPA

MNSL- shall leave in SSA-2b Stormwater TCHD

022 place, 700 ft

(approx) of Control Plan CDPHE

stormwater

control berm to

the north of Lake

Ladcra access

road. The

subcontractor

shall refurbish the

berm where

necessary

Legend Notes

TCHD = Tri-County Health Department (1) FCR-XXX-YYY-01 Where XXX is Projectl3esignation and YYY is Tusk or Subcontract Designation

CDPHF = Colimado Department of Health mid Environment (2) Insert FCR Form item I

EPA = Environmental Protection Agency (3) Insert charg c category in FCR Form item 3 6574-1/1-A

LSR = Lake Sediments Remediation (4) Insert latest date in FCR Form item 4ý

STS = Southern Tier Soils Remerhation (5) Insert Disposition checked in FCR Form item 5 or "Pendungý'

NTS = Northern Tier Soils Remediation (6) FCR Forra item 6. Insert date of RVO Engineer Signature in FCR Form item 5

MNSL = Miscellaneous 14ortherrdSouthem/Lake Sediments Remediation (7) Inse rt "TCHD", "CDPI-IE" or'TPA!'as those regulatory agoncics'representatives sign in 00020362

1 1 1 ýý 117 11 1 1 , I I 0ý
§ 54.1008 Mobility Fund Phase I disbursements. ( a ) A winning bidder for Mobility Fund Phase I support will be advised by public notice whether it has been authorized to receive support. The public notice will detail how disbursement will be made available.
( b ) Mobility Fund Phase I support will be available for disbursement to authorized winning bidders in three stages. ( 1 ) One-third of the total possible support, if coverage were to be extended to 100 percent of the units deemed unserved in the geographic area, when the winning bidder is authorized to receive support.
( 2 ) One-third of the total possible support with respect to a specific geographic area when the recipient demonstrates coverage of 50 percent of the coverage requirements of § 54.1006(a) or (b), as applicable.
( 3 ) The remainder of the total support, based on the final total units covered, when the recipient demonstrates coverage meeting the requirements of § 54.1006(a) or (b), as applicable.
( c ) A recipient accepting a final disbursement for a specific geographic area based on coverage of less than 100 percent of the units in the area previously deemed unserved waives any claim for the remainder of potential Mobility Fund Phase I support with respect to that area.
( d ) Prior to each disbursement request, a winning bidder for support in a Tribal land will be required to certify that it has substantively engaged appropriate Tribal officials regarding the issues specified in § 54.1004(d)(1), at a minimum, as well as any other issues specified by the Commission and to provide a summary of the results of such engagement.
( e ) Prior to each disbursement request, a winning bidder will be required to certify that it is in compliance with all requirements for receipt of Mobility Fund Phase I support at the time that it requests the disbursement.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

I, Bruce Coleman, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Openwave Systems Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) forthe registrant and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared; 

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles; 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: July 7, 2008
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ No. 1D 18

- 2141

_____________________________ M ARCUS G OGGINS , Petitioner ,

v.
S TATE O F F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assis tance of Appellate Counsel

— Original Jurisdiction

.

September 26, 2018

P ER C URIAM

. The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.
M AKAR , O STERHAUS , and J AY , JJ., concur
.

_____________________________ Not fin al until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Marcus Goggins, pro se , Petitioner

. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent

.
#### § 42.01 Applicability.

This part prescribes the regulations governing the preservation of records of communication common carriers that are fully subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission.
§ 24.247 Triggering a reimbursement obligation. ( a ) *Licensed PCS.* The clearinghouse will apply the following test to determine if a PCS entity preparing to initiate operations must pay a PCS relocator or a voluntarily relocating microwave incumbent in accordance with the formula detailed in § 24.243: ( 1 ) All or part of the relocated microwave link was initially co-channel with the licensed PCS band(s) of the subsequent PCS entity;
( 2 ) A PCS relocator has paid the relocation costs of the microwave incumbent; and
( 3 ) The subsequent PCS entity is preparing to turn on a fixed base station at commercial power and the fixed base station is located within a rectangle (Proximity Threshold) described as follows: ( i ) The length of the rectangle shall be x where x is a line extending through both nodes of the microwave link to a distance of 48 kilometers (30 miles) beyond each node. The width of the rectangle shall be y where y is a line perpendicular to x and extending for a distance of 24 kilometers (15 miles) on both sides of x. Thus, the rectangle is represented as follows:
( ii ) If the application of the Proximity Threshold test indicates that a reimbursement obligation exists, the clearinghouse will calculate the reimbursement amount in accordance with the cost-sharing formula and notify the subsequent PCS entity of the total amount of its reimbursement obligation.
( b ) *Unlicensed PCS.* UTAM's reimbursement obligation is triggered either: ( 1 ) When a county is cleared of microwave links in the unlicensed allocation, and UTAM invokes a Zone 1 power cap as a result of third party relocation activities; or
( 2 ) A county is cleared of microwave links in the unlicensed allocation and UTAM reclassifies a Zone 2 county to Zone 1 status.
( c ) Any new entrants granted licenses for the 1910-1915 MHz band must reimburse UTAM a pro rata share of its total expenses incurred by UTAM as of the date that the new entrants gain access to the band. The percent required by new entrants to pay shall be calculated based upon the amount of spectrum granted to the new entrant as compared to the total amount of spectrum UTAM is responsible for clearing of incumbents (20 megahertz), and must be paid before a new entrant begins operations in the band. For example, if a new entrant obtains a license for 5 megahertz of spectrum in this band, it is required to reimburse UTAM one-quarter of UTAM's total costs to date on a pro rata shared basis. New entrants will be responsible for the actual costs associated with future relocation activities in their licensed spectrum, but will be entitled to seek reimbursement from UTAM for the proportion of those band clearing costs that benefit users of the 1915-1930 MHz band.
[61 FR 29692, June 12, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 12757, Mar. 18, 1997; 69 FR 67836, Nov. 22, 2004]
#### Andrew P. Leach et al. v. Benjamin Renwald.

Filed May 22, 1895.

No. 6021.

Necessity of Ruling on Motion for New Trials Review. No reversal of a judgment can be had where the errors assigned are solely such as are claimed to have occurred during the trial and in the rendition of the judgment against plaintiff in error, if in the district court a ruling upon a motion for a new trial is not shown to have been made.

Error from the district court of Hitchcock county. Tried below before Welty, J.

*Woolman & Strout,*for plaintiffs in error.

*George E. Banks, contra.*

Ryan, C.

This case was tried without the intervention of a jury and judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff by the district court of Hitchcock county for the sum of $21.65 and costs. The defendant now seeks a reversal of this judgment against him, and in his petition in error assigns errors occurring at the trial and in rendering judgment for plaintiff in view of the law and evidence. There was filed a motion for a new trial in the district court, upon which the record discloses no ruling. In *Jones v. Hayes,*36 Neb., *208526, this court held that a review in error of the proceedings of the district court could not be had unless therein had been presented and passed upon a motion for a new trial. This rule has in its support the following cases: *Cropsey v. Wiggenhorn,*3 Neb., 108; *Gibson v. Arnold,*5 Neb., 186; *Lichty v. Clark,*10 Neb., 472; *Smith v. Spaulding,*34 Neb., 128; *Shrimpton v. King,*39 Neb., 779; *Brown v. Ritner,*41 Neb., 52; *Gordon v. Little,*41 Neb., 250. The judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.
[Civ. No. 2101.

Second Appellate District.

March 2, 1918.]

#### A. D. ANDERSON, Appellant, v. H. W. WILCOX et al., Respondents.

Appeal—Judgment—Record—Printing in Bribes.—Where on an appeal from a judgment the only record consists of a typewritten transcript, and no part of the record is printed in the briefs, except the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the brief of respondents, and the facts found are sufficient t'o support the judgment, the judgment must be affirmed, since it will be presumed that counsel have presented in their briefs, all portions of the record which they desired to call to t'he attention of the appellate court.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. T. L. Lewis, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

H. W. Scheld, and W. J. Carr, for Appellant.

Shreve & Shreve, for Respondents.

CONREY, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals from the judgment. In the briefs the action is described by counsel for appellant as one in replevin to recover the possession of certain personal property, and by counsel for the respondents as an action to recover damages for alleged wrongful conversion of personal property. No part of the record has been printed in the briefs, except that the findings of fact and conclusions of law are printed in the brief of respondents.

The facts found are sufficient to sustain the judgment. Counsel for appellant say that the findings of fact are contrary to the evidence, but do not point out any particulars in which the evidence is not sufficient to support those findings. They further say in their brief that “the evidence in this case shows” certain facts stated by them, without setting forth any part of the record of such evidence. The only record on appeal consists of a typewritten transcript. It is presumed that by their briefs counsel have presented to us all portions of the record to which they desire to call our attention. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 953c.) Many decisions concerning such defective presentations of the record are col*431lected in *Barker Brothers*v. *Joos, ante,*p. 311, [171 Pac. 1085].

The judgment is affirmed.

James, J., and Works, J., *pro tern,.,*concurred.
# Kelly Fletcher at Cyber Beacon 2021

/ Published Feb. 4, 2022

Dr. Kelly Fletcher, who is performing the duties of the DoD CIO, sits down with CIC faculty member and lead for the CIO LDP, Harry Wingo, at Cyber Beacon 2021.

CHECK OUT THE VIDEO HERE
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 130 (Thursday, July 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 41638]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-17111]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[I.D. 062900C]


North Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The North Pacific Fishery Management Council's (NPFMC) 
Observer Committee will meet in Seattle, WA.

DATES: The meeting will be held on July 24-25, 2000.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Alaska Fisheries Science 
Center, 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Bldg. 4, Room 1055, Seattle, WA.
    Council address: North Pacific Fishery Management Council, 605 W. 
4th Ave., Suite 306, Anchorage, AK 99501-2252.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chris Oliver, NPFMC, 907-271-2809.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. on 
Monday, July 24, and continue until business for the day is completed. 
The meeting will reconvene on Tuesday, July 25, at 9:00 a.m.
    The committee's agenda includes the following issues:
    1. Review and discuss information on:
    A. General observer needs by week;
    B. Foreign observer program model; and
    C. Updated estimates of observer costs, exvessel value, and 
potential fee percentage.
    2. Review and discuss findings of an independent review of the 
North Pacific groundfish observer program prepared by MRAG Americas.
    3. Discuss baseline program goals and objectives.
    4. Discuss and identify major program alternatives
    5. Discuss and resolve appropriate wording for Magnuson-Stevens Act 
reauthorization.
    6. Identify additional information needs.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in this agenda may come 
before this committee for discussion, those issues may not be the 
subject of formal action during this meeting. Action will be restricted 
to those issues specifically listed in this notice and any issues 
arising after publication of this notice that require emergency action 
under section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and 
Management Act, provided the public has been notified of the Council's 
intent to take final action to address the emergency.

Special Accommodations

    These meetings are physically accessible to people with 
disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other 
auxiliary aids should be directed to Helen Allen, 907-271-2809, at 
least 5 working days prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: June 29, 2000.
Richard W. Surdi,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 00-17111 Filed 7-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
VACANCY ANNOUNCEMENT: ASSISTANT /ASSOCIATE /PROFESSOR/PROFESSOR OF PRACTICE
 
  APPLY HERE  Duties
 Summary
    The College of Information and Cyberspace is one of five colleges at NDU. Its mission is to prepare graduates to lead national security institutions and advance global security in the information environment. The diverse curriculum (delivered in face-to-face, online and hybrid formats) focuses on all aspects of national security and cyber power, information technology, strategic leadership and financial management. The aim is to produce graduates who can enhance an organization's capabilities by innovatively leveraging resources, information, analytics, and technologies to provide solutions and policy that are effective, agile, secure and resilient.
    NDU develops joint warfighters and other national security leaders through rigorous academics, research and engagement to serve the common defense.**This is a Title 10 Excepted Service Appointment. Appointment is not to exceed 3 years with the possibility for extension.**
    Learn more about this agency
    Responsibilities
    The primary duty of College of Information and Cyberspace faculty is teaching core and elective graduate-level courses for senior leaders from a diverse curriculum that focuses on the information environment and DoD's extensive cyberspace presence from a national security perspective. Other duties include: maintaining academic currency through rigorous scholarship; participating in the development and implementation of the academic program; mentoring students and assessing their academic performance; serving on committees and performing other College leadership duties as assigned; contributing to the professional development of faculty colleagues; and developing and maintaining professional relationships with key stakeholders and decision-makers in Washington, DC and around the world.
    Travel Required
    Occasional travel - 15% of the time
    Supervisory status
    No
    Promotion Potential
    4
§ 51.100 General duty. ( a ) Each telecommunications carrier has the duty: ( 1 ) To interconnect directly or indirectly with the facilities and equipment of other telecommunications carriers; and
( 2 ) To not install network features, functions, or capabilities that do not comply with the guidelines and standards as provided in the Commission's rules or section 255 or 256 of the Act.
( b ) A telecommunication carrier that has interconnected or gained access under sections 251(a)(1), 251(c)(2), or 251(c)(3) of the Act, may offer information services through the same arrangement, so long as it is offering telecommunications services through the same arrangement as well.
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly report of Palomar  Enterprises,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  September  30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
we, Steve  Bonenberger,  acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive  Officer,
and Brent Fouch, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify to the best of
our  knowledge,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Steve Bonenberger
----------------------------
Steve Bonenberger
Chief Executive Officer
November 10, 2003


/s/ Brent Fouch
----------------------------
Brent Fouch
Chief Financial Officer
November 10, 2003