alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT      32**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| Dated:                August 9,                2006 | By:    | /s/                Jeffrey P. Baker    |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                                                |   | Jeffrey                P. Baker        |
|                                                |   | Chief                Executive Officer |
|                                                |   |                                   |
| Dated:                August 9,                2006 | By:    | /s/                David J. Steichen   |
|                                                |   | David                J. Steichen       |
|                                                |   | Chief                Financial Officer |
Hi David,

The range of sulfur content in the coke utilized to make anodes 

used in the reduction cells over the last year of operation at 

Alcoa Rockdale was 1.8 to 2.0 percent sulfur by weight.

The highest sulfur content in the coke utilized to make anodes 

used in the reduction cells at any time during the last 10 years 

at Alcoa Rockdale was 2.0 percent sulfur by weight.

The question concerning the lowest sulfur content anode coke 

that you believe you could consistently obtain in sufficient 

quantities to operate your facility at capacity, long term (e.g. 

over the next 10

years) will be addressed by our corporate staff. I do not have 

a way of providing such a projection from the site level.

Thanks,

Terry L. Blodgett

David Putney, Environmental Engineer

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Sector Policies and 

Programs Division

109 T.W. Alexander Drive, RTP, NC 27711

Mail Drop D243-02

Ph: (919) 541-2016 Fax: (919) 541-3207

Email: putney.david@epa.gov
IIA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4581

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 15 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition,

and Forestry

JUNE 28 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Committee discharged

AN ACT

To provide for the imposition of temporary fees in connection

with the handling of complaints of violations of the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 1930.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FILING AND HANDLING FEES FOR COMPLAINTS

4 OF VIOLATIONS OF PERISHABLE AGRICUL5 TURAL COMMODITIES ACT, 1930.

6 (a) TEMPORARY FILING FEE REQUIRED.—During

7 fiscal years 1995 and 1996, the Secretary of Agriculture

8 shall require persons who submit petitions to the Secretary
2

HR 4581 CDS

1 under section 6(a) of the Perishable Agricultural Com2 modities Act, 1930 (7 U.S.C. 499f(a)), alleging a violation

3 of section 2 of such Act (7 U.S.C. 499b), to include a

4 filing fee of $60 per petition.

5 (b) TEMPORARY HANDLING FEE REQUIRED.—Dur6 ing fiscal years 1995 and 1996, if the Secretary deter7 mines under section 6(a) of the Perishable Agricultural

8 Commodities Act, 1930 (7 U.S.C. 499f(a)), that the facts

9 contained in a petition described in such section warrant

10 further action, the person or persons submitting the peti11 tion shall submit to the Secretary a handling fee of $300.

12 The Secretary may not forward a copy of the complaint

13 to the commission merchant, dealer, or broker involved

14 until after the Secretary receives the required handling

15 fee. In determining the amount of damages incurred by

16 an injured person or persons preparatory to issuing a rep17 aration order under section 7 of such Act (7 U.S.C. 499g),

18 the Secretary shall include the amount of any handling

19 fee paid by the injured person or persons under this sub20 section.

21 (c) DEPOSIT OF FEES.—The Secretary shall deposit

22 fees submitted under this section into the Perishable Agri23 cultural Commodities Act Fund.

Passed the House of Representatives June 16, 1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4635 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4635

            To extend the Export Administration Act of 1979.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 23, 1994

 Mr. Hamilton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To extend the Export Administration Act of 1979.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 20 of the 
Export Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 2419) is amended by 
striking ``June 30, 1994'' and inserting ``August 20, 1994''.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           BD

<S>                                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                    Jan-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                                       Feb-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                         Oct-31-1999
<CASH>                                                                17,585,967
<RECEIVABLES>                                                            485,931
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                                            0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                                          0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                                                      776,943
<PP&E>                                                                   239,294
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                        19,305,014
<SHORT-TERM>                                                                   0
<PAYABLES>                                                               175,190
<REPOS-SOLD>                                                                   0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                                            0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                                       322,913
<LONG-TERM>                                                              400,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                                 114,763
<OTHER-SE>                                                            16,971,741
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                          19,305,014
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                                        869,727
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                                                     336,890
<COMMISSIONS>                                                          6,050,161
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                                                  0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                        19,605
<COMPENSATION>                                                         3,683,646
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                        1,479,364
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                                             1,479,364
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                                             922,977
<EPS-BASIC>                                                               0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                               0.09



</TABLE>
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2


                        CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report MIV Therapeutics, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended February 28, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Patrick
McGowan, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.

/S/ PATRICK MCGOWAN
-------------------
Patrick McGowan
CFO
April 14, 2005
No. 11-8718.

#### Oakley *v.*Shearin, Warden, et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________
No. 24

- 12342
Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________ JOHN THOMAS SCHOOLCRAFT,
Petitioner

- Appellant,

versus WARDEN, G.S.P.,

Respondent

- Appellee.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 2:19

- cv

- 00087

- LGW

- BWC

____________________ USCA11 Case: 24-12342 Document: 9-1 Date Filed: 09/06/2024 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 24

- 12342

Before L AGOA , B RASHER , and A BUDU , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM : This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte , for lack of jurisdiction because John Schoolcraft’s notice of appeal is untimely to challenge the district court’s June 3, 2024 order denying his motion for relief from the final judgment

. See Green v. Drug Enf’t Admin. , 606 F.3d 1296, 1300 (11th Cir. 2010). Even if Schoolcraft ’s notice of appeal is deemed filed on July 12, 2024 under the prison mailbox rule
, the notice is untimely because the deadline to appeal the district court’s June 3, 2024 order was July 3, 2024

. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A); 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a) ; Jeffries v. United States , 748 F.3d 1310, 1314 (11th Cir. 2014) (noting that a pro se prisoner’s notice of appeal is deemed filed on the date he delivers it to prison authorities for mailing, butif that date is unknown and there is not contrary evidence, the notice is deemed filed on the date he signed it)

. Furthermore, there is no basis in the record for relief under Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5) or 4(a)(6)

. S ee 28 U.S.C. § 2107(c) ; Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)( 5 ) , (6). All pending motions are DENIED as moot. No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40

- 3 and all other applicable rules. USCA11 Case: 24-12342 Document: 9-1 Date Filed: 09/06/2024 Page: 2 of 2
No. 11-9382.

#### Muchnick *v.*Pennsylvania.

Super. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.
# Dr. Brian A. Shott

### Visiting Professor and State Department Chair

### 

### 

A career member of the Senior Foreign Service, Brian joined the faculty of the College of Information and Cyberspace in August 2022.  Prior to joining the college, he was posted to the U.S. Mission to Saudi Arabia from 2017-2022, where he served as Counselor for Political Affairs, Acting Deputy Chief of Mission, and Public Affairs Counselor.  Previous to his tour at the Embassy in Riyadh, he served as Press Attaché in Cairo, as Cultural Affairs Attaché in Baghdad, and as Public Affairs Officer in Skopje, where his team supported post-communist transitions in the Balkan nation.  In Morocco, he was Deputy Political Counselor and Political-Military Affairs Officer, supporting one of the largest bilateral military engagement programs in Africa.  As Deputy Director for the OSCE in the Bureau of European Affairs, Brian managed the human dimension portfolio, promoting human rights and freedoms through the multilateral forum. 

Prior to joining the Foreign Service, Brian served as Assistant Professor and Assistant Dean in the College of Arts and Sciences at the University of Virginia.  He holds a Ph.D. in Anthropology from the University, as well as a Master of Science in National Security Resource Strategy from the Eisenhower School at NDU.  Brian speaks Albanian, Arabic, Macedonian, and Serbian.  His wife, Dinka Masic, is also a Foreign Service Officer.
NIOSH ALERT

Many workers have
died from falls
through skylights
or roof openings.

Be aware of all skylights and roof openings in your work area.
Do not sit or step on skylights—they may not support your weight.
Read any safety decals affixed to skylights.

Use fall protection for any work that might result in falls.

1.
2.
3.
4.
a

Make sure that all skylights and roof openings are appropriately
guarded before work begins.

6. Use nets, catch platforms, or fixed covers if guardrails, screens,
protective grillwork, and safety belts are not practical.

or additional information, refer to the NIOSH Alert °
an Skylights (DHHS NIOSH 90-100), or call — w 4
1-800-35-NIOSH.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Public Health Service

Centers for Disease Control

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

This document is in the public domain and may be freely copied or reprinted. NIGSH
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Greater Atlantic Financial Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Carroll E. Amos, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

A.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

B.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     as of and for the period covered by the Report.



                                      By: /s/ Carroll E. Amos
                                          -------------------
                                          Carroll E. Amos
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer


                                          Date: May 13, 2005
#### § 30.406 Directional antennas.

(a) Unless otherwise authorized upon specific request by the applicant, each station authorized under the rules of this subpart must employ a directional antenna adjusted with the center of the major lobe of radiation in the horizontal plane directed toward the receiving station with which it communicates: *provided, however,* where a station communicates with more than one point, a multi- or omni-directional antenna may be authorized if necessary.

(b) Fixed stations (other than temporary fixed stations) must employ transmitting and receiving antennas (excluding second receiving antennas for operations such as space diversity) meeting the appropriate performance Standard A indicated in the table to this section, except that in areas not subject to frequency congestion, antennas meeting performance Standard B may be used. For frequencies with a Standard B1 and a Standard B2, in order to comply with Standard B an antenna must fully meet either Standard B1 or Standard B2. Licensees shall comply with the antenna standards table shown in this paragraph in the following manner:

(1) With either the maximum beamwidth to 3 dB points requirement or with the minimum antenna gain requirement; and

(2) With the minimum radiation suppression to angle requirement.

| Frequency (MHz) | Category | Maximum beamwidth to 3 dB points1 (included angle in degrees) | Minimum antenna gain (dbi) | Minimum radiation suppression to angle in degrees from centerline of main beam in decibels | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 5° to 10° | 10° to 15° | 15° to 20° | 20° to 30° | 30° to 100° | 100° to 140° | 140° to 180° |
| 38,600 to 40,0002 | A | n/a | 38 | 25 | 29 | 33 | 36 | 42 | 55 | 55 |
| | B | n/a | 38 | 20 | 24 | 28 | 32 | 35 | 36 | 36 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 If a licensee chooses to show compliance using maximum beamwidth to 3 dB points, the beamwidth limit shall apply in both the azimuth and the elevation planes. | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2 Stations authorized to operate in the 38,600-40,000 MHz band may use antennas other than those meeting the Category A standard. However, the Commission may require the use of higher performance antennas where interference problems can be resolved by the use of such antennas. | | | | | | | | | | |
792 A.2d 1242

#### IN THE MATTER OF RICHARD P. MULÉ, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

April 2, 2002.

ORDER

RICHARD P. MULÉ, of TRENTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1982, and who thereafter was temporarily suspended from the practice of law by Order of this Court filed February 26, 2002, and who remains suspended at this time, having tendered his consent to disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that RICHARD P. MULÉ, is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys.

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
§ 54.719 Parties permitted to seek review of Administrator decision. ( a ) Any party aggrieved by an action taken by the Administrator, as defined in § 54.701, § 54.703, or § 54.705, must first seek review from the Administrator.
( b ) Any party aggrieved by an action taken by the Administrator, after seeking review from the Administrator, may then seek review from the Federal Communications Commission, as set forth in § 54.722.
( c ) Parties seeking waivers of the Commission's rules shall seek relief directly from the Commission.
[79 FR 49204, Aug. 19, 2014]
§ 0.420 Other Commission publications. The following additional Commission publications may be purchased from the Superintendent of Documents: ( a ) Statistics of Communications Common Carriers.
( b ) Figure M-3, Estimated AM Ground Conductivity of the United States (set of two maps).
( c ) Television Network Program Procurement Report, 2d Interim Report, Part 2, by the Office of Network Study.
[32 FR 10571, July 19, 1967, as amended at 44 FR 39180, July 5, 1979]
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

 

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

 

In connection with this annual report of ML Trend-Following Futures Fund L.P. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Barbra E. Kocsis, Chief Financial Officer of Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC, the general partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1. This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: March 15, 2011

 
| By                              | /s/   BARBRA E. KOCSIS |   |
|---------------------------------|------------------------|--------|
| Barbra   E. Kocsis              |                   |
| Chief   Financial Officer       |                   |
| (Principal   Financial Officer) |                   |

 

----
#### § 60-300.41 Availability of affirmative action program.

The full affirmative action program, absent the data metrics required by § 60-300.44(k), shall be made available to any employee or applicant for employment for inspection upon request. The location and hours during which the program may be obtained shall be posted at each establishment.
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**

Bank of Florida—Southwest Florida, Naples, Collier County, Florida. 

Organized under the laws of the State of Florida. 

Bank of Florida TrustCompany f/k/a Citizens Capital Management, Inc., Naples, Collier County, Florida. 

Organized under the laws of the State of Florida. 

Bank of Florida—Southeast, Broward County, Florida. 

Organized underthe laws of the State of Florida. 

Bank of Florida—Tampa Bay, Hillsborough County, Florida. 

Organized under the laws of the State of Florida
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                    21,186
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   160,752
<INVENTORY>                                     18,427
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,784
<PP&E>                                         221,519
<DEPRECIATION>                                  69,559
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,966
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          623,790
<BONDS>                                         72,157
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          108,180
<PREFERRED>                                        198
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   287,136
<SALES>                                        623,790        
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               509,064
<CGS>                                          380,217
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  380,217
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,279
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,199
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,345
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,014
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,331
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,331
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .58
        

</TABLE>
No. 11-8834.

#### Hubbard *v.*Illinois.

App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

STEPHEN MARKS,

Appellant,

v.

VITAS HEALTHCARE CORP. of FLORIDA, INC.,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-1014

[April 13, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Carol-Lisa Phillips, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE-20-

014254.

Stephen Marks, Tamarac, pro se.

Debra Potter Klauber, Misti Z. Barnett, and Kenneth J. Miller of 

Haliczer, Pettis & Schwamm, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, CIKLIN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.