alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 27.64 Protection from interference. Wireless Communications Service (WCS) stations operating in full accordance with applicable FCC rules and the terms and conditions of their authorizations are normally considered to be non-interfering. If the FCC determines, however, that interference which significantly interrupts or degrades a radio service is being caused, it may, after notice and an opportunity for a hearing, require modifications to any WCS station as necessary to eliminate such interference. ( a ) *Failure to operate as authorized.* Any licensee causing interference to the service of other stations by failing to operate its station in full accordance with its authorization and applicable FCC rules shall discontinue all transmissions, except those necessary for the immediate safety of life or property, until it can bring its station into full compliance with the authorization and rules.
( b ) *Intermodulation interference.* Licensees should attempt to resolve such interference by technical means.
( c ) *Situations in which no protection is afforded.* Except as provided elsewhere in this part, no protection from interference is afforded in the following situations: ( 1 ) *Interference to base receivers from base or fixed transmitters.* Licensees should attempt to resolve such interference by technical means or operating arrangements.
( 2 ) *Interference to mobile receivers from mobile transmitters.* No protection is provided against mobile-to-mobile interference.
( 3 ) *Interference to base receivers from mobile transmitters.* No protection is provided against mobile-to-base interference.
( 4 ) *Interference to fixed stations.* Licensees should attempt to resolve such interference by technical means or operating arrangements.
( 5 ) *Anomalous or infrequent propagation modes.* No protection is provided against interference caused by tropospheric and ionospheric propagation of signals.
( d ) *Harmful interference to SDARS operations requiring resolution.* The following conditions will be presumed to constitute harmful interference to SDARS operations from WCS operations in the 2305-2320 MHz and 2345-2360 MHz bands and require WCS operators to work cooperatively with SDARS operators to address areas where such power levels are exceeded and harmful interference occurs: ( 1 ) A WCS ground signal level greater than −44 dBm in the upper or lower A or B block, or −55 dBm in the C or D block, present at a location on a roadway, where a test demonstrates that SDARS service would be muted over a road distance of greater than 50 meters; or
( 2 ) A WCS ground signal level exceeding −44 dBm in the upper or lower A or B block, or −55 dBm in the C or D block on a test drive route, which is mutually agreed upon by the WCS licensee and the SDARS licensee, for more than 1 percent of the cumulative surface road distance on that drive route, where a test demonstrates that SDARS service would be muted over a cumulative road distance of greater than 0.5 percent (incremental to any muting present prior to use of WCS frequencies in the area of that drive test).
[62 FR 9658, Mar. 3, 1997, as amended at 78 FR 9621, Feb. 11, 2013]
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 226 (Friday, November 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 70161]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-28474]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRN-9754-2]

Meeting of the National Environmental Education Advisory Council

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Environmental Education Advisory Council will 
meet on December 13-14th, 2012 in Washington, DC. The focus of the 
meeting will be to convene the new members of the Council, form work 
groups and develop plans for the report to congress.
    This is an open meeting and all interested persons are invited to 
attend. The Council will hear comments from the public between 4:30 
p.m. and 5:00 p.m. on Thursday December 13th, 2012. Each individual or 
organization wishing to address the NEEAC meeting will be allowed a 
maximum of five minutes to present their point of view. Also, written 
comments should be submitted electronically to araujo.javier@epa.gov. 
Please contact the Designated Federal Officer (DFO) at the number 
listed below to schedule agenda time. Time will be allotted on a first 
come first serve basis, and the total period for comments may be 
extended if the number of requests for appearances requires it.

ADDRESSES: The NEEAC meeting will be held at Ariel Rios North, Room 
3530 located at 1201 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20004.
    The Council's meeting minutes and summary notes will be available 
online after the meeting, at http://www.epa.gov/enviroed/neeac.html or 
can be obtained by written request to the DFO.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Javier Araujo, DFO for the National 
Environmental Education Advisory Council (NEEAC) at (202) 564-2642 or 
email at araujo.javier@epa.gov.
    Information on Services for Those with Disabilities: To request 
accommodation of a disability, please request it 10 days prior to the 
meeting, to give EPA as much time as possible to process your request.
    Please contact Javier Araujo at (202) 564-2642 or email at: 
araujo.javier@epa.gov.

Javier Araujo,
Designated Federal Officer, National Environmental Education Advisory 
Council.
[FR Doc. 2012-28474 Filed 11-21-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
134557 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 134557 COA: 278015 Kent CC: 06-012263-FH MICHAEL KENNETH FRY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the June 15, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t1022 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 29, 2007

Clerk
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Effective August 10, 2006  


 
 

Polypore Administrative Policy—Severance    
    


Purpose  


In
the event of the termination of employment of a Polypore salaried employee for reason other than Cause, the employee may be eligible for severance payment. 



Eligibility  


Salaried
exempt employees with more than one year of service, who are terminated for reason other than Cause. Examples include job elimination, workforce reduction, or inability to satisfactorily
perform the duties assigned. Eligibility will be determined by the Senior Vice President of Human Resources in consultation with the Senior Leadership Team member responsible for the employee. 


The
following guidelines will be used to determine the number of weeks of severance provided to the terminated employee. 



	

	 
	 	AGE PLUS SERVICE

	 
	 	< 30
	 	30-39
	 	40-49
	 	50+

	

	Professional Level	 	4 wks	 	6 wks	 	8 wks	 	12 wks
	Managerial Level	 	8	 	10	 	12	 	16
	Director Level	 	12	 	14	 	16	 	20
	VP Level	 	14	 	18	 	22	 	26
	SLT Level	 	26	 	39	 	52	 	52
	






The
severance payment will be equal to the employee's annual base pay divided by 52 times the number of weeks indicated on the above matrix. The Company reserves the right to determine if the payments
will be made in a lump sum or salary continuation. 


In
addition to the severance payment, the employee will be eligible to continue in the Polypore Medical Plan under COBRA at their current employee contribution rate for the same number of weeks. After
the expiration of the number of weeks of severance, the terminated employee may continue medical coverage at the normal COBRA rates. 



Non-exempt
employees may be eligible for 4 weeks of severance under this policy. 











QuickLinks


Polypore Administrative Policy—Severance
#### § 69.158 Universal service end user charges.

To the extent the company makes contributions to the Universal Service Support Mechanisms pursuant to §§ 54.706 and 54.709 of this chapter and the local exchange carrier seeks to recover some or all of the amount of such contribution, the local exchange carrier shall recover those contributions through a charge to end users other than Lifeline users. These contributions are not a part of any price cap baskets, and the charge to recover these contributions is not part of any other element established pursuant to part 69. Such a charge may be assessed on a per-line basis or as a percentage of interstate retail revenues, and at the option of the local exchange carrier it may be combined for billing purposes with other end user retail rate elements. A local exchange carrier opting to assess the Universal Service end-user rate element on a per-line basis may apply that charge using the “equivalency” relationships established for the multi-line business PICC for Primary Rate ISDN service, as per § 69.153(d), and for Centrex lines, as per § 69.153(e).

[65 FR 38704, June 21, 2000; 65 FR 57744, Sept. 26, 2000]
§ 101.1411 Regulatory status and eligibility. ( a ) MVDDS licensees are permitted to provide one-way video programming and data services on a non-common carrier and/or on a common carrier basis. MVDDS is not required to be treated as a common carrier service unless it is providing non-Internet voice and data services through the public switched network.
( b ) MVDDS licensees in the 12.2-12.7 GHz band are subject to the requirements set forth in § 101.7.
( c ) Any entity, other than one precluded by §§ 101.7 and 101.1412, is eligible for authorization to provide MVDDS under this part. Authorization will be granted upon proper application filing in accordance with the Commission's rules.
#### § 32.1500 Other jurisdictional assets—net.

This account shall include the cumulative impact on assets of jurisdictional ratemaking practices which vary from those of this Commission. All entries recorded in this account shall be recorded net of any applicable income tax effects and shall be supported by subsidiary records where necessary as provided for in § 32.13(e) of subpart B.
### WAlN r "Telfc& RECBVED JUL 0 2 2015 •*be! Acosta. Clerk "' FILED IN •E^AvirV, • CnyftoP, COURTOF CRIMINALAPPEALS 

## ^ ^ tf' /O ** JUL 02 22,5 Ahfil Acosta. CierK

^u-J \. 

### V \ T

X, 

### NVug, on£5&r\cg <^eoL£^\VvNe £or V\V\Oa a. pev^Vicm £©Y_ X\yo«>^\eLAiP Pror.e^nVfc U3Y\creTyl ^TV\e Cc^r^_o^_JCri.t»:vna^_^^^co\s_

JL 

### J&L9C>AtoorNe^__£eqvJ£S^ u?.»Vl be Jft\lyed-JJ'TSA3r__ji36r^^-Jp^ Vo^ dflV^r> ^^VWn UorwVeA onoucme^Ar on6 

### v. fr\e Pfl?\ ''Wa Se".
Motion Denied; Order filed January 13 , 2015.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00455

- CR

____________ GREGORIO MORENO, Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 185th District Court

Harris Count y, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1406639



### ORDER

Appellant is represented by appointed counsel, Vivian R. King . Appellant ’ s brief was originally due August 20, 2014

. We granted a total of more than 90 days extension of time to file appellant ’ s brief until December 5, 2014. When we granted the last extension, we noted that no further extensions would be granted absent exceptional circumstances. No brief was filed. On December 18, 2014
, counsel filed a further request for extension of time to file appellant ’ s brief statingthat a brief would be filed December 31, 2014

. No brief was filed. On January 6,

2015, appellant filed a further request for extension of time to file appellant’s brief stating the brief would be filed by January 12, 2015. Counsel did not al lege any exceptional circumstances in the request.
We deny the request for extension and issue the following order.
Accordingly, we order Vivian R. King to file a brief with the clerk of this
Court on or before February 5, 2015 . If counsel does not timely file appellant’s brief as ordered, the Court will issue an order abating the appeal and directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the reason for the failure to file the brief and the consideration of sanctions, appointment of new counsel , or other appropriate relief.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Donovan, and Wise

.
§ 22.737 Temporary fixed stations. The FCC may, upon proper application therefor, authorize the construction and operation of temporary fixed stations. Temporary fixed stations are to be used as rural subscriber, interoffice, or central office stations when those stations are unavailable or when service from those stations is disrupted by storms or emergencies. ( a ) *Six month limitation.* If it is necessary for a temporary fixed station to remain at the same location for more than six months, the licensee of that station must apply for authorization to operate the station at the specific location at least 30 days before the end of the six month period.
( b ) *International communications.* Communications between the United States and Canada or Mexico must not be carried using a temporary fixed station without prior authorization from the FCC. Licensees desiring to carry such communications should apply sufficiently in advance to allow for the time necessary to coordinate with Canada or Mexico.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4594 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4594

 To amend the Japan-United States Friendship Act to broaden investment 
authority and to strengthen criteria for membership on the Japan-United 
                     States Friendship Commission.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 16, 1994

  Mr. Wise (for himself and Mr. Petri) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Japan-United States Friendship Act to broaden investment 
authority and to strengthen criteria for membership on the Japan-United 
                     States Friendship Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. UNITED STATES PANEL OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE ON UNITED STATES-
              JAPAN CULTURAL AND EDUCATIONAL COOPERATION.

    Section 4 of the Japan-United States Friendship Act (22 U.S.C. 
2903) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(d) The membership of the United States Panel of the Joint 
Committee on United States-Japan Cultural and Educational Cooperation 
shall be drawn from among individuals who are deeply familiar with 
Japan and United States-Japan relations, as demonstrated in their 
professional careers, and who have performed distinguished service in--
            ``(1) law, business, or finances;
            ``(2) education, training, or research at postsecondary 
        levels;
            ``(3) the media or publishing;
            ``(4) foundation or philanthropic activity;
            ``(5) the American arts, culture, or the humanities; or
            ``(6) other aspects of American public life.''.

SEC. 2. BROADENING INVESTMENT AUTHORITY.

    Section 7 of the Japan-United States Friendship Act (22 U.S.C. 
2906) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) in the first sentence, by inserting ``, at the 
                direction of the Chairman of the Commission,'' after 
                ```Secretary')''; and
                    (B) in the second sentence, by striking ``in 
                interest bearing obligations of the United States or in 
                obligations guaranteed as to both principal and 
                interest by the United States'' and inserting ``in 
                instruments of public debt with maturities suitable to 
                the needs of the Fund''; and
            (2) in subsection (c), by inserting ``, at the direction of 
        the Chairman of the Commission,'' after ``sold''.

                                 <all>
```
§ 22.973 Information exchange. ( a ) *Prior notification.* Public safety/CII licensees may notify a part 90 ESMR or cellular radiotelephone licensee that they wish to receive prior notification of the activation or modification of part 90 ESMR or cellular radiotelephone cell sites in their area. Thereafter, the part 90 ESMR or cellular radiotelephone licensee must provide the following information to the public safety/CII licensee at least 10 business days before a new cell site is activated or an existing cell site is modified: ( 1 ) Location;
( 2 ) Effective radiated power;
( 3 ) Antenna height;
( 4 ) Channels available for use.
( b ) *Purpose of prior notification.* The prior coordination of cell sites is for informational purposes only. Public safety/CII licensees are not afforded the right to accept or reject the activation of a proposed cell or to unilaterally require changes in its operating parameters. The principal purposes of notification are to: ( 1 ) Allow a public safety licensee to advise the part 90 of this chapter ESMR or Cellular Radiotelephone licensee whether it believes a proposed cell will generate unacceptable interference;
( 2 ) Permit Cellular Radiotelephone or part 90 of this chapter ESMR licensees to make voluntary changes in cell parameters when a public safety licensee alerts them to possible interference; and
( 3 ) Rapidly identify the source if interference is encountered when the cell is activated.
[69 FR 67834, Nov. 22, 2004]
§ 32.5001 Basic area revenue. ( a ) This account shall include revenue derived from the provision of the following: ( 1 ) Basic area message services such as flat rate services and measured services. Included is revenue derived from non-optional extended area services. Also included is revenue derived from the billed or guaranteed portion of semi-public services.
( 2 ) Optional extended area service.
( 3 ) Cellular mobile telecommunications systems connected to the public switched network placed between mobile units and other stations within the mobile service area.
( 4 ) General radio telecommunications systems connected to the public switched network placed between mobile units and other stations within the mobile service area, as well as revenue from mobile radio paging, mobile dispatching, and signaling services.
( b ) Revenue derived from charges for nonpublished number or additional and boldfaced listings in the alphabetical section of the company's telephone directories shall be included in account 5230, Directory revenue.
( c ) Revenue from private mobile telephone services which do not have access to the public switched network shall be included in Account 5200, Miscellaneous revenue.
[67 FR 5691, Feb. 6, 2002, as amended at 69 FR 53650, Sept. 2, 2004]
## NUMBER 13 - 20 - 00 562 - C V 

## COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

IN RE PORT ISABEL LOGISTICAL OFFSHORE TERMINAL, INC.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

.


## ORDER
Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Hinojosa and Tijerina Order Per Curiam By this original proceeding, relator Port Isabel Logistical Offshore Terminal, In c. argues that the trial court abused its discretion by entering an order on December 8, 2020 which is “inconsistent with a previously

- affirmed judgment and not related to the singular issue for which the case [was] remanded.” Relator has filed an Emergency Motion for Stay of the December 8, 2020 order, arguing that: (1) the December 8, 2020 order permits real party in interest Subsea 7 Port Isabel LL C to remove improvements from the subject
proper t y which allegedly belong to relator; (2) trial court issued its own stay of the2 December 8, 2020 order but that stay expires on Ja nuary 22, 2021; and ( 3 ) relator will suffer irreparable harm if this Court does not stay the order

. Having reviewed the motion and the record documents provided by relator, this Court finds that the Motion for Emergency Stay is meritorious and should be gr anted. According ly, we GRANT the motion and the trial court’s December 8, 2020 order in this cause is hereby STAYED until the petition for writ of mandamus may be disposed of on its merits or until further order of this Court. PER CURIAM
D elivered and filed on the 20 th day of January , 202 1

.
STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY 

SOURCE TEST CALIBRATION METHOD IV 

BARTON ANALYZER CALIBRATION 

I. Principle 

The Barton Titrater is calibrated by means of standard atmospheres of H2S 

supplied by gravimetrically calibrated permeation tubes over a range of zero to 60 

ppm. 

II. Equipment 

(1) Barton Titrater, with cellls and chart recorder. 

(2) H2S permeation tubes, gravimetrically calibrated for emission rates at 

25 degrees C. 

(3) Calibrated flowmeters, calibrated wet test meter, Teflon tubing, Teflon 

and glass control valves, glass manifold with gas mixing tubes, constant 

temperature bath pump. 

III. Procedure

Set up and adjust the Barton with the necessary connections for sampling from the 

permeation tubes immersed in the constant temperature bath. Install calibrated 

flowmeters and pump to supply the required air flow to the Barton via the 

manifold. Allow adequate time for equilibration of the permeation tubes at the set 

temperature. Sample four (4) upscale concentrations of gas starting with a blank 

determination on zero air, and including a zero blank between each concentration. 

Repeat any unstable traces and allow at least 15 minutes of recording at each 

concentration point. The necessary recorded values should be at 20%, 40%, 60% 

and 80% of full scale. 

IV. Calculations

Calculate the four standard atmospheres as concentrations of H2S in ppm, 

according to the following formula: . 

H2S (ppm plus or minus 5%) equals .719 x P x L

Flow 

P is Permeation rate in ng/min./cm tube length. 

L is the length of permeation tubes used for concentration point. 

Flow is the total sample flow over the tubes into the manifold. 

Plot both calculated and recorded concentration points vs. 0 –100 chart div. as a 

calibration curve. 
STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY 

BARTON TITRATER CALIBRATION 

Date _________________________ 

Permeation Tubes Used: Permeation Rate @ 25 degrees C 

________________________ ______________________ ng/min 

________________________ ______________________ 

________________________ ______________________ 

________________________ ______________________ 

Calculated H2S Concentration (ppm) Barton Recorder Reading

1. ______________________ ______________________ 

2. ______________________ ______________________ 

3. ______________________ ______________________ 

4. ______________________ ______________________ 

Plot both calculated values and Barton recorder values vs. 0 – 100 chart division. The 

plot should be linear, an respective point values should agree within plus or minus 5%.
409P15

#### Gregory P. Nies and Diane S. Nies v. Town of Emerald Isle, a North Carolina Municipality

1. Pits’ Notice of Appeal Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA15-169)

1.-

2. Pits’ PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

2. Allowed

3. Pits’ Motion to Admit J. David Breemer *Pro Hac Vice*

3. Allowed

4. Def’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal

4. Allowed
#### § 27.1201 [Reserved]