alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 64.640 Compensation for IP Relay. ( a ) For the period from July 1, 2022, through June 30, 2026, TRS Fund compensation for the provision of IP Relay shall be as described in this section.
( b ) For Fund Year 2022-23, comprising the period from July 1, 2022, through June 30, 2023, the Compensation Level for IP Relay shall be $1.9576 per minute.
( c ) For each succeeding Fund Year through June 30, 2026, the per-minute Compensation Level (LFY) shall be determined in accordance with the following equation: LFY = LFY-1 * (1+IFFY) where IFFY is the Inflation Adjustment Factor for that Fund Year, determined in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.
( d ) The inflation adjustment factor for a Fund Year (IFFY), to be determined annually on or before June 30, is equal to the difference between the Initial value and the Final value, as defined herein, divided by the Initial value. The Initial value and Final value, respectively, are the values of the Employment Cost Index compiled by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, for total compensation for private industry workers in professional, scientific, and technical services, for the following periods: ( 1 ) *Final value.* The fourth quarter of the Calendar Year ending 6 months before the beginning of the Fund Year; and
( 2 ) *Initial value.* The fourth quarter of the preceding Calendar Year.
( e ) In addition to LFY, an IP Relay provider shall be paid a per-minute exogenous cost adjustment if claims for exogenous cost recovery are submitted by the provider and approved by the Commission on or before June 30. Such exogenous cost adjustment shall equal the amount of such approved claims divided by the provider's projected minutes for the Fund Year. Exogenous cost adjustments, if any, are not included in the previous Fund Year's per-minute Compensation Level (LFY-1) for purposes of paragraph (c) of this section.
( f ) An exogenous cost adjustment shall be paid if an IP Relay provider incurs well-documented costs that: ( 1 ) Belong to a category of costs that the Commission has deemed allowable;
( 2 ) Result from new TRS requirements or other causes beyond the provider's control;
( 3 ) Are new costs that were not factored into the applicable compensation formula; and
( 4 ) If unrecovered, would cause a provider's current allowable-expenses-plus-operating margin to exceed its revenues.
[87 FR 42660, July 18, 2022, as amended at 89 FR 20133, Mar. 21, 2024]
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Civic Education - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"UyHkW1HP7a\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/information-for\/civic-education\/\">Civic Education<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/information-for\/civic-education\/embed\/#?secret=UyHkW1HP7a\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Civic Education” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"UyHkW1HP7a\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Welcome Resources for Teachers Resources for Students Court History Welcome Welcome to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s page on civic education.\u00a0 These resources are to help familiarize you with the federal judiciary, our government, and the unique aspects of the Federal Circuit.\u00a0 The Federal Circuit has nationwide jurisdiction in a variety […]","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/CivicEducationBanner.png"}
149P16

#### State v. Ronald Audra Ingram

Def’s *Pro Se*PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-794)

Dismissed
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Community Bank Corporation of America (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Kenneth P. Cherven, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |                                                          
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 9, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Kenneth P. Cherven                                   
|                     |  |     |  | Kenneth P. Cherven, President and Chief Executive Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Updated Argument and Electronic Filing Resources - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"3rMC1eicqv\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/updated-argument-and-electronic-filing-resources\/\">Updated Argument and Electronic Filing Resources<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/updated-argument-and-electronic-filing-resources\/embed\/#?secret=3rMC1eicqv\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Updated Argument and Electronic Filing Resources” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"3rMC1eicqv\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"The Clerk\u2019s Office has released updated electronic filing procedures (version 2.2) to coincide with changes to the argument notification process.\u00a0 Additionally, a new Argument Resources page and the Guide to Oral Argument (pdf) are also now available.\u00a0 For additional information, refer to the October 4, 2018 notice on the court\u2019s website (pdf).\u00a0"}
§ 64.6403 Establishment of mechanisms for submission of line separation requests. ( a ) A covered provider shall offer a survivor the ability to submit a line separation request through secure remote means that are easily navigable, provided that remote options are commercially available and technically feasible. A covered provider shall offer more than one remote means of submitting a line separation request and shall offer alternative means to accommodate individuals with different disabilities. A covered provider may offer means of submitting a line separation request that are not remote if the provider does not require a survivor to use such non-remote means or make it more difficult for survivors to access remote means than to access non-remote means. For purposes of this subpart, remote means are those that do not require a survivor to interact in person with an employee of the covered provider at a physical location.
( b ) The means a covered provider offers pursuant to this section must allow survivors to submit any information and documentation required by 47 U.S.C. 345 and this subpart. A covered provider may offer means that allow or require survivors to initiate a request using one method and submit documentation using another method. A covered provider shall permit a survivor to submit any documentation required by 47 U.S.C. 345 and this subpart in any common format.
( c ) Any means that a covered provider offers pursuant to this section shall: ( 1 ) Use wording that is simple, clear, and concise;
( 2 ) Present the information requests in a format that is easy to comprehend and use;
( 3 ) Generally use the same wording and format on all platforms available for submitting a request;
( 4 ) Clearly identify the information and documentation that a survivor must include with a line separation request and allow survivors to provide that information and documentation easily;
( 5 ) Be available in all the languages in which the covered provider advertises its services; and
( 6 ) Be accessible by individuals with disabilities, including being available in all formats (*e.g.,* large print, braille) in which the covered provider makes its service information available to individuals with disabilities.
No. 11-9909.

#### Carpenter *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT EB ER ISAAC PORR

AS, Pe titione r, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 12-71379 Age n c y No. A070-967-311 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d

Nove m b e r 19, 2013 ** B e fore : C ANB Y, TR OTT, a nd THOM AS, C irc uit Judge s. Ebe r Isa a c Porra s, a

nat i ve and c itiz e n of Gua te m a la , pe titions for re vie w of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ orde r dism issing his a ppe a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s (“ IJ” ) de c ision de ny ing his motion to re o pe n de porta t ion proc e e dings. Our jurisdict ion is governe d by 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie wfor



# FIL ED DEC 6 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).a

buse o f disc re tion the a ge nc y ’ s de nia l of a m otion to re o pe n. N

ajmabadi v . Holde r , 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th C ir. 2010). W e de ny in pa rt a nd dismiss in pa

rt the pe tition for re vie w. The a ge n c y

did not a b u se its disc re tion in deny ing Porra s’ s m otion to re ope n a s untim e ly

whe re the m otion wa s file d thirte e n y e a rs a fte r IJ’ s fina l orde r of de porta tion, se e 8 C .F.R . § 1003.23(b)(1), a nd Porra s fa i le d to e sta

blish prima

fa c ie e ligibility for a sy lum , withholding of re m ova l, or re lie f unde r the C onve ntion Aga inst Torture , se e N

ajmabadi , 597 F.3d a

t 986 (a ge nc y

m ay de ny a m o tion to re ope n ba se d on fa ilure to e sta

blish a prim a fa c ie c a se for the re lie f sought); Me n de z-Gutie rre

z v . Gonzale

s , 444 F.3d 1168, 1172 (9th C ir. 2006) (“ va gue and c onc lusory

a lle gations” insuffic ie nt to e sta blish prim a

fa c ie e ligibility

). B e c a use Porra s’ s m otion did not a lle ge fa c ts tha

t would e s ta

blish e ligibility

for re lie f, he wa s not e ntitle d to a

n e vide ntia

ry he aring. Se e 8 U.S.C . § 1229a (c )(7)(B ). Fina lly , we la c k

jurisdic tion to re vie w the a ge nc y ’ s de c ision not to exe rc ise its sua sponte a

uthority to re ope n de porta

tion proc e e dings. S

e e Me jia-He rnande

z v . Holde r , 633 F.3d 818, 823-24 (9th C ir. 2011). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D in par t; DISM ISSE D in par t.

2
No. 11-5217.

#### Gilliland *v.*Turner, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 24, 2022

No. 04

- 21

- 00579

- CR

EX PARTE ERIC URIEL SIFUENTES , et al,

From the 63rd Judicial District Court

, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 5135

Roland Andrade , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Lori I. Val enzuela, Justice

On December 22, 2021, appellants filed a notice of appeal of the denial of their pretrial

habeas applications and an opposed emergency motion for immediate release under Texas Code

of Criminal Procedure article 17.151.

On January 2 4 , 2022

, we issued our opinion in this case which, essentially, granted the

relief requested in the emergency motion. We therefore deny the emergency motion as moot.

It is so ORDERED Janu ary 24 , 202 2

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

__________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, CLERK OF COURT
No. 11-5126.

#### Tyler *v.*District of Columbia.

Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.
From: Fisher, Brian

To: "aaron_L_szabo@omb.eop.gov"

Cc: Risley, David; Mark, Jeremy

Subject: Part of E.O. 12866 Review: Interagency Discussion about TSDs for the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule for the 2008

 Ozone NAAQS [2060-AS05]

Date: Monday, October 26, 2015 6:25:00 PM

Attachments: EO12866_2008 O3 NAAQS CSAPR Update 2060 AS05 NPRM FRN_20150928 Non-EGU TSD.pdf

EO12866_2008 O3 NAAQS CSAPR Update 2060 AS05 NPRM FRN_20150928

 FinalRTIreportNOxControlMeasure.pdf

EO12866_2008 O3 NAAQS CSAPR Update 2060 AS05 NPRM FRN_20150928 FinalSRACoSTReduction.pdf

EO12866_2008 O3 NAAQS CSAPR Update 2060 AS05 NPRM FRN_20150928 FinalSRANOxStateRACT.pdf

EO12866_2008 O3 NAAQS CSAPR Update 2060 AS05 NPRM FRN_20150928 FinalSRACoSTReview25-100ton.xlsx

EO12866_2008 O3 NAAQS CSAPR Update 2060 AS05 NPRM FRN_20150928

 FinalSRACoSTReviewOver100tons.xlsx

EO12866_2008 O3 NAAQS CSAPR Update 2060 AS05 NPRM FRN_20150928 FinalSRAengines.xlsx

EO12866_2008 O3 NAAQS CSAPR Update 2060 AS05 NPRM FRN_20150928 FinalSRAStateNOxRACTLimits.xlsx

Aaron,

Please find attached the non-EGU Technical Support Document for the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule

for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS proposal (EO12866_2008 O3 NAAQS CSAPR Update 2060 AS05 NPRM

FRN_20150928.  Included are:

-The TSD document

-Appendix A contractor report

-Appendix B contractor reports

-Excel spreadsheets to accompany appendices (4 files total)

Let me know if you need anything else.  The first document with “non-EGU TSD” in the file name

constitutes the main body of the TSD.

Brian Fisher

Policy Analyst

Clean Air Markets Division

(202) 343-9633
PSB Exhibit 10.3  (00129428.DOC;1)


Exhibit 10.3







Peoples State Bank 

Senior Management Incentive Compensation Plan







The Senior Management Incentive Compensation Plan provides an annual cash incentive opportunity for executive officers of PSB Holdings, Inc. in their capacities as Bank officers.  Incentive compensation is determined under a formula that derives 70% of the incentive compensation amount from the achievement of the Bank’s net income target and 30% from the achievement of the officer’s department goals.  The following table illustrates the potential incentive compensation at various levels of net income and selected levels of achievement of department goals.  Incentive compensation is paid in cash following the determination of results under the plan for the preceding fiscal year.  




								
	% of Targeted Net Income 

	% of Department Goals Achieved


	Before Bank Wide Year-end Incentive Expense

	25%

	 	50%

	 	75%

	 	100%


	 	Incentive Compensation as a Percentage of Base Salary


	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	less than 95%

	    .8%

	 	  1.5%

	 	  2.3%

	 	  3.0%


	  95%

	  2.2%

	 	  2.9%

	 	  3.7%

	 	  4.4%


	  97%

	  3.6%

	 	  4.3%

	 	  5.1%

	 	  5.8%


	  98%

	  5.0%

	 	  5.7%

	 	  6.5%

	 	  7.2%


	  99%

	  6.4%

	 	  7.1%

	 	  7.9%

	 	  8.6%


	100%

	  7.8%

	 	  8.5%

	 	  9.3%

	 	10.0%


	102%

	  9.7%

	 	10.6%

	 	11.6%

	 	12.5%


	105%

	12.4%

	 	13.6%

	 	14.8%

	 	16.0%


	107%

	15.5%

	 	17.0%

	 	18.5%

	 	20.0%


	109%

	19.4%

	 	21.3%

	 	23.1%

	 	25.0%


	111%

	23.3%

	 	25.5%

	 	27.7%

	 	30.0%
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                  |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Bu Shengfu                                                   |   |   |   |
| Bu                Shengfu                                             |   |   |        |
| President (Principal                Executive                Officer) |   |   |   |
| February 4, 2008                                                      |   |   |   |
|                                                                  |   |   |   |
| /s/ Liang Zhu                                                         |   |   |   |
| Liang                Zhu                                              |   |   |   |
| Chief Financial                Officer                                |   |   |   |
| February 4, 2008                                                      |   |   |   |
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 99.2

MIV Therapeutics Inc. Retains Strategic Growth as Investor Relations Advisor

June 10, 2004 MIV Therapeutics Inc. (MIVT:OTCBB) a company developing the next
generation of coatings for drug delivery on stents and medical devices is
pleased to announce it has retained the services of Strategic Growth
International Inc. (SGI), to provide global exposure to the investment
community.

"In an effort to gain recognition among institutional investors and retail
buyers, we are pleased to enlist the services of SGI to facilitate an ambitious
market awareness program for MIVT," said Chairman, President and CEO Alan
Lindsay. "We look forward to working with SGI to implement investor relations
initiatives as our company reaches significant development milestones ahead.
With our current progress and achievements we believe the timing is appropriate
to garner the support of the institutional investment community".

Founded in 1989, SGI is headed by Richard Cooper and Stanley Altschuler, two
long-time and highly respected Wall Street veterans, who have assembled an
experienced team of investment/financial professionals. Since its inception in
1989, Strategic Growth has achieved an unparalleled level of excellence and
success, particularly in the biotechnology and health services sectors.

Leading this account for SGI is, Richard E. Cooper, Chairman and co-founder of
Strategic Growth International, Inc. Prior to his co-founding SGI, Mr. Cooper
was a Managing Director at Salomon Brothers for five of his 14 years at the
firm.

About MIV Therapeutics

MIV Therapeutics is developing a "next generation" line of advanced
biocompatible hydroxyapatite coatings for passive and drug-eluting application
on cardiovascular stents and other implantable medical devices. MIV's ultra-thin
coating has been designed to inhibit inflammatory response and restenosis.

The drug-eluting HAp technology is being developed in collaboration with UBC
under a Collaborative Research Agreement and is funded in part by a
Collaborative Research and Development Grant awarded by the Natural Sciences and
Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC).

MIVT's manufacturing facility meets the guidelines applicable to CE Mark, FDA
and GMP requirements. Please visit www.mivtherapeutics.com for more information.

Forward-Looking Statements: The discussion above contains forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995. These statements by their nature involve substantial risks and
uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially depending on a variety of
factors.
#### § 101.1513 License term.

The license term is ten years, beginning on the date of the initial authorization (nationwide license) grant. Registering links will not change the overall renewal period of the license.

[70 FR 29998, May 25, 2005]