47246 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 158 / Wednesday, August 16, 2006 / Notices 

Commission has issued a limited 

exclusion order in the above-captioned 

investigation directed against products 

of respondent System General 

Corporation (‘‘SG’’) of Taipei, Taiwan. 

The investigation is terminated. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michelle Walters, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–5468. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// 

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 

13, 2005, the Commission instituted this 

investigation, based on a complaint filed 

by Power Integrations, Inc. (‘‘PI’’) of San 

Jose, California. 70 FR 34149 (June 13, 

2005). The complaint, as amended and 

supplemented, alleged violations of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 

U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

and the sale within the United States 

after importation of certain power 

supply controllers and products 

containing the same. The Commission 

determined that SG violated section 337 

by reason of infringement of claims 1, 3, 

5, and 6 of United States Patent No. 

6,351,398 (‘‘the ’398 patent’’) and claims 

26 and 27 of United States Patent No. 

6,538,908 (‘‘the ’908 patent’’). The 

Commission requested written 

submissions from the parties relating to 

the appropriate remedy, whether the 

statutory public interest factors preclude 

issuance of that remedy, and the amount 

of bond to be imposed during the 

Presidential review period. All parties 

filed written submissions. 

Having reviewed the record in this 

investigation, including the written 

submissions of the parties, the 

Commission has made its determination 

on the issues of remedy, the public 

interest, and bonding. The Commission 

has determined that the appropriate 

form of relief is a limited exclusion 

order prohibiting the unlicensed entry 

of power supply controllers that infringe 

one or more of claims 1, 3, 5, and 6 of 

the ’398 patent or claims 26 and 27 of 

the ’908 patent and that are 

manufactured by or on behalf of SG, its 

affiliated companies, parents, 

subsidiaries, licensees, contractors, or 

other related business entities, or 

successors or assigns. The Commission 

has also determined to prohibit the 

unlicensed entry of LCD computer 

monitors, AC printer adapters, and 

sample/demonstration boards 

containing such infringing power 

supply controllers. 

The Commission further determined 

that the public interest factors 

enumerated in section 337(d)(1) (19 

U.S.C. 1337(d)(1)) do not preclude 

issuance of the limited exclusion order. 

Finally, the Commission determined 

that the amount of bond to permit 

temporary importation during the 

Presidential review period (19 U.S.C. 

1337(j)) shall be in the amount of thirtyeight (38) cents per power supply 

controller circuit or LCD computer 

monitor, AC printer adapter, or sample/ 

demonstration board containing the 

same that are subject to the order. The 

Commission’s order was delivered to 

the President and the United States 

Trade Representative on the day of its 

issuance. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in 

section 210.50 of the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.50). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: August 11, 2006. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E6–13512 Filed 8–15–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Public Meeting by 

Teleconference Concerning Heavy 

Duty Diesel Engine Consent Decrees 

The Department of Justice and the 

Environmental Protection Agency will 

hold a public meeting on September 13, 

2006 at 10 a.m. by teleconference. The 

subject of the meeting will be 

implementation of the provisions of the 

seven consent decrees signed by the 

United States and diesel engine 

manufacturers and entered by the 

United States District Court for the 

District of Columbia on July 1, 1999 

(United States v. Caterpillar, Case No. 

1:98CV02544; United States v. Navistar 

International Transportation 

Corporation, Case No. 1:98CV02545; 

United States v. Cummins Engine 

Company, Case No. 1:98CV02546; 

United States v. Detroit Diesel 

Corporation, Case No. 1:98CV02548; 

United States v. Volvo Truck 

Corporation, Case No. 1:98CV02547; 

United States v. Mack Trucks, Inc., Case 

No. 1:98CV01495; and United States v. 

Renault Vehicles Industries, S.A., Case 

No. 1:98CV02543). In supporting entry 

by the court of the decrees, the United 

States committed to meet periodically 

with states, industry groups, 

environmental groups, and concerned 

citizens to discuss consent decree 

implementation issues. Future meetings 

will be announced here and on EPA’s 

Diesel Engine Settlement Web site at: 

http://www.epa.gov/compliance/ 

resources/cases/civil/caa/diesel/ 

index.html. 

Interested parties should contact the 

Environmental Protection Agency at the 

address listed below prior to the 

meeting to reserve a telephone line and 

receive instructions for the call. 

Agenda 

1. Panel Remarks—10 a.m. 

Remarks by DOJ and EPA regarding 

implementation of the provisions of the 

diesel engine consent decrees. 

2. Public comments and questions. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Anne Wick, EPA Diesel Engine Consent 

Decree Coordinator, U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency (Mail Code 2242A), 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20460; e-mail: 

wick.anne@epa.gov. 

Karen S. Dworkin, 

Assistant Chief, Environment & Natural 

Resources Division, Environmental 

Enforcement Section. 

[FR Doc. 06–6943 Filed 8–15–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–M 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Second 

Amendment to Consent Decree 

Involving Point Ruston, LLC and 

Asarco LLC Under the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response 

Compensation, and Liability Act 

Notice is hereby given that on July 27, 

2006, a proposed amendment to the 

existing consent decree (the ‘‘Second 

Amendment’’) in United States v. 

Asarco Inc., Civil Action No. C91–

5528B was lodged with the United 

States District Court for the Western 

District of Washington. 

This Second Amendment involves the 

potential sales of property owned by 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES