alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vectoria Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Serge Doyon, President and acting CFO, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

	(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

	(2)	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: September 24, 2003	By:/s/ Serge Doyon
Name:	Richard St-Julien on behalf of Serge Doyon

	Title:	President and acting CFO
#### § 101.309 Requirement that licensees respond to official communications.

All licensees in these services are required to respond to official communications from the Commission with reasonable dispatch and according to the tenor of such communications. Failure to do so will be given appropriate consideration in connection with any subsequent applications which the offending party may file and may result in the designation of such applications for hearing, or in appropriate cases, the institution of proceedings looking to the modification or revocation of the pertinent authorizations.
§ 54.712 Contributor recovery of universal service costs from end users. ( a ) Federal universal service contribution costs may be recovered through interstate telecommunications-related charges to end users. If a contributor chooses to recover its federal universal service contribution costs through a line item on a customer's bill the amount of the federal universal service line-item charge may not exceed the interstate telecommunications portion of that customer's bill times the relevant contribution factor.
( b ) [Reserved]
[67 FR 79533, Dec. 30, 2002, as amended at 68 FR 15672, Apr. 1, 2003; 71 FR 38797, July 10, 2006]
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF
GERHARD E. KURZ, PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULE 15d-14(b)

The undersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer Seabulk Transport,
Inc., general partner of Seabulk Tankers, Ltd., general partner of Seabulk
Transmarine Partnership, Ltd. (the Partnership), does hereby certify that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the
Form 10-Q) of the Partnership fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

| |  |                                                                   | 
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| |  | /s/ Gerhard E. Kurz
Name: Gerhard E. Kurz
Date: December 22, 2003
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Notice of Modified Procedures for Non-Electronic Filing and Submissions - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"SGIvRVY9La\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/notice-of-modified-procedures-for-non-electronic-filing-and-submissions\/\">Notice of Modified Procedures for Non-Electronic Filing and Submissions<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/notice-of-modified-procedures-for-non-electronic-filing-and-submissions\/embed\/#?secret=SGIvRVY9La\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Notice of Modified Procedures for Non-Electronic Filing and Submissions” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"SGIvRVY9La\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Due to conditions in the vicinity of the National Courts Building in Washington, D.C. that are impacting pedestrian and vehicular access for in-person, courier, or third-party commercial carriers, the Clerk’s Office will be inaccessible for purposes of receiving paper filings, mail and courier deliveries, and night box submissions from 12:01 p.m. (Eastern) on Wednesday, January […]"}
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 2.1047 Measurements required: Modulation characteristics. ( a ) *Voice modulated communication equipment.* A curve or equivalent data showing the frequency response of the audio modulating circuit over a range of 100 to 5000 Hz shall be submitted. For equipment required to have an audio low-pass filter, a curve showing the frequency response of the filter, or of all circuitry installed between the modulation limiter and the modulated stage shall be submitted.
( b ) *Equipment which employs modulation limiting.* A curve or family of curves showing the percentage of modulation versus the modulation input voltage shall be supplied. The information submitted shall be sufficient to show modulation limiting capability throughout the range of modulating frequencies and input modulating signal levels employed.
( c ) *Single sideband and independent sideband radiotelephone transmitters which employ a device or circuit to limit peak envelope power.* A curve showing the peak envelope power output versus the modulation input voltage shall be supplied. The modulating signals shall be the same in frequency as specified in paragraph (c) of § 2.1049 for the occupied bandwidth tests.
( d ) *Other types of equipment.* A curve or equivalent data which shows that the equipment will meet the modulation requirements of the rules under which the equipment is to be licensed.
[39 FR 5919, Feb. 15, 1974. Redesignated and amended at 63 FR 36599, July 7, 1998]
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 2.915 Grant of application. ( a ) A Commission recognized TCB will grant an application for certification if it finds from an examination of the application and supporting data, or other matter which it may officially notice, that: ( 1 ) The equipment is capable of complying with pertinent technical standards of the rule part(s) under which it is to be operated as well as other applicable requirements; and
( 2 ) A grant of the application would serve the public interest, convenience and necessity.
( b ) Grants will be made in writing showing the effective date of the grant and any special condition(s) attaching to the grant.
( c ) Certification shall not attach to any equipment, nor shall any equipment authorization be deemed effective, until the application has been granted.
( d ) Grants will be from the date of publication on the Commission Web site and shall show any special condition(s) attaching to the grant. The official copy of the grant shall be maintained on the Commission Web site.
( e ) The grant shall identify the approving TCB and the Commission as the issuing authority.
( f ) In cases of a dispute the Commission will be the final arbiter.
[39 FR 5919, Feb. 15, 1974, as amended at 48 FR 3621, Jan. 26, 1983; 62 FR 10470, Mar. 7, 1997; 63 FR 36598, July 7, 1998; 80 FR 33440, June 12, 2015; 88 FR 7624, Feb. 6, 2023]
EXHIBIT 31.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Shane Smith, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly  report on Form 10-Q of Ecuity,  Inc., for the
quarter ended March 31, 2005;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The small business  issuer's other  certifying  officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining  disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the small business issuer and have:

         a) designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure  that  material  information  relating  to  the  small  business  issuer,
including its  consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared;

         (b)  Evaluated  the   effectiveness  of  the  small  business  issuer's
disclosure  controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business  issuer's
internal  control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially  affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and


5. The small business  issuer's other  certifying  officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the small business issuer's auditors and
the audit  committee of registrant's  board of directors (or persons  performing
the equivalent functions):

         a) all significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal  control over financial  reporting which are reasonably
likely to  adversely  affect  the small  business  issuer's  ability  to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

         b) any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
other  employees  who  have a  significant  role  in the  registrant's  internal
controls.

Date:  May 18, 2005

/s/ Shane Smith
------------------------
Shane Smith
Chief Executive Officer


                                       30
§ 3.21 Order of consideration. ( a ) Accounting Authority applications will be processed on a first-come, first-served basis. When applications are received on the same day, the application with the earliest mailing date, as evidenced by the postmark, will be processed first. Interim accounting authorities seeking permanent certifications through the “grandfathering” process will not compete with other applicants during the first 60 days following the effective date of these rules which is allowed for submission of their applications. After the “grandfathering” process is completed, all other applicants will be processed as in paragraph (a) of this section.
( b ) At any given time, there will be no more than 25 certified accounting authorities with a minimum of 15 “US” AAICs reserved for use by accounting authorities conducting settlement operations within the United States. The Commission will retain all valid applications received after the maximum number of accounting authorities have been approved and will inform such applicants that should an AAIC become available for reassignment in the future, the Commission will conditionally certify as an accounting authority the oldest of the qualified pending applicants, as determined by the order of receipt. Final certification would be conditional upon filing of an amended application (if necessary). The Commission will inform the applicant of his/her conditional selection in writing to confirm the applicant's continued interest in becoming an accounting authority.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-15-000377-CV

The City of Leander; Kent Cagle, Individually and in his Official Capacity as

City Manager of the City of Leander; and Thomas Yantis, Individually and in his 

Official Capacity as Assistant City Manager and Planning Director for the City of Leander,

Appellants

v.

Premas Global Leander I, LLC, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 277TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 15-0088-C277, HONORABLE STACEY MATHEWS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The appellee has filed an agreed motion to dismiss this appeal. We grant the motion

and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).

__________________________________________

Scott K. Field, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Field

Dismissed on Agreed Motion

Filed: September 18, 2015
#### § 27.1111 Relocation of fixed microwave service licensees in the 2110-2150 and 2160-2200 MHz bands.

Part 22, subpart E and part 101, subpart B of this chapter contain provisions governing the relocation of incumbent fixed microwave service licensees in the 2110-2150 MHz and 2160-2200 MHz bands.

[79 FR 32414, June 4, 2014]
§ 32.2231 Radio systems. ( a ) This account shall include the original cost of ownership of radio transmitters and receivers. This account shall include the original cost of ownership interest in satellites (including land-side spares), other spare parts, material and supplies. It shall include launch insurance and other satellite launch costs. This account shall also include the original cost of earth stations and spare parts, material or supplies therefor.
( b ) This account shall also include the original cost of radio equipment used to provide radio communication channels. Radio equipment is that equipment which is used for the generation, amplification, propagation, reception, modulation, and demodulation of radio waves in free space over which communication channels can be provided. This account shall also include the associated carrier and auxiliary equipment and patch bay equipment which is an integral part of the radio equipment. Such equipment may be located in central office building, terminal room, or repeater stations or may be mounted on towers, masts, or other supports.
[67 FR 5686, Feb. 6, 2002]
#### § 302-5.100 How should we administer the househunting trip expenses allowance?

You should administer the househunting trip expenses allowance to minimize or avoid its use when other satisfactory and more economical arrangement are available.
§ 24.431 Mutually exclusive applications. ( a ) The Commission will consider applications to be mutually exclusive if their conflicts are such that the grant of one application would effectively preclude by reason of harmful electrical interference, or other practical reason, the grant of one or more of the other applications. The Commission will presume “harmful electrical interference” to mean interference which would result in a material impairment to service rendered to the public despite full cooperation in good faith by all applicants or parties to achieve reasonable technical adjustments which would avoid electrical conflict.
( b ) Mutually exclusive applications filed on Form 175 for the initial provision of narrowband PCS service are subject to competitive bidding in accordance with the procedures in subpart F of this part and in 47 CFR part 1, subpart Q.
( c ) An application will be entitled to comparative consideration with one or more conflicting applications only if the Commission determines that such comparative consideration will serve the public interest.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- )

)

At Ease Sustainment LLC ) ASBCA No. 63083

)

Under Contract No. SPE1C1

- 21

- D

- 1421 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT : Randy E. Kleinman, Esq.

Gerstman Schwartz, LLP

Garden City, NY

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Daniel K. Poling, Esq.

DLA Chief Trial Attorney

Lindsay A. Salamon, Esq.

Kelly L. Diaz

- Albertini, Esq.

Robert L. Kieffer, Esq.

Trial Attorneys

DLA Troop Support

Philadelphia, PA

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

By email dated November 3, 2021, appellant filed a notice of appeal with the

Board, which was docketed on November 8, 2021. Between August 23, 2022, and

November 21, 2022, appellant failed to respond to several Board Orders directing

appellant to submit i ts election of procedure. The Board sent each O rder to the email

address utilized by appellant to file its notice of appeal. Additionally, the Board

attempted to contact appellant’s counsel via phone and left a message on December 19,

2022. To date, no response has been received.

By Order dated December 22, 2022, a ppellant was directed , within 21 days, to

either file its election of procedure or show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed

for failure to prosecute. T he Show Cause Order was distributed to the parties on

December 23, 2022, but appellant has not responded. Accordingly, the above appeal is

dismissed w ith prejudice under Board Rule 1 7

.

Dated: Januar y 2 4 , 2023

(Signatures continued) JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals2 I concur

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD

Administrative Judge

Vice Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals I concur

OWEN C. WILSON

Administrative Judge

Vice Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63083

, Appeal of At Ease

Sustainment LLC , rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: January 24, 2023

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
Exhibit 31.1

I, Christian A. Larsen, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of E-LOAN, Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

May 7, 2004

/s/ Christian A. Larsen 		   Christian A. Larsen
   Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman

---
11/09/201 1 13:4 9 FAX 202493514 2 FA A ^ QM S @|00l/00 2

" A.-'K f T OPERATlO^i-

- UNITE D STATE S O F AMERIC A / ^ r-/ > • —• » • " U . S . DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPQRTATIOff^ f * j ,f " ll/ C ^ n\ \IQ V - ^ P 1 ^FEDERA t AVIATIONADJVUNFSTRAT/O N ^^^ 1 W C ^ WASHINGTON , D.C . >JO V - 8 201 1 

# HEAR/A/ G DOCKE T I n th e matter

o f ) FA A Docke t No . Unassigne d ) CaseNo.2009SO95049 0 LIBERT Y FLYIN G SERVICES . INC . ) La w Judg e Unas<;igne

d 

## ^0//

- //'/ ^ COMPLAINANT^ S MOTIO N T O WTTIIDRAW COMPLAIN T Pursuan t to 14C.F.R. § 13.21 5 o f

th e Rule s o f

Practic e i n Federal Aviatio n Administratio n Civi l Penalt y Action s th e Complainaji t th e Federal Aviatio n Administration , hereb y files this motio n t o withdraw th e complain t i n ihi s matter

becaus e asetileracat

wa ^ reache db

y ih c FA A an dLibert y Flyin g Ser\'ices , Inc . o

n Novembe r

2 , 2011 . vVHKREFORE , Complainan t respectfully request s tha

t th e complain t

b e withdraw n an

dtha t thi. i matter

be terminated .

Respectfully submitted , 

# MLS . Nichola s R . Milliard Attorney Enforcement

Division , AGC-30 0 Offic e o f th e Chie f Counse l Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D.C . 2059 1 Telephone : (202 ) 267-345 2 Facsimile : (202 ) 267-510 6 Date : November

8 . 201 1 coie.mr/Jrani@faa.go v11/09/^01 1 13:4 8 FAX 202493514 2 FA A - DM S [2]002/00 2

CKRTIFICAT E O F SERVIC E I hereb y certif

y tha t o n thi s diit e I sen t b y U.S . Certifie dMai

U return receip t requested , auopy of

th e Complainant' s Motio n t o Withdraw Complaint

i n th e cas e o f

A ? ih e Matte r

o f Lihen y Flyin g Services . Jnc , Cas e No . 2009SO950490 , addresse dto : Mr . Ray Jones , Esq . 4 3 foili e Lan e Pikevillc , K

Y 4150 1 I n addition . I hereb y certif

y tha t o n thi s date I personall y delivere dth e original an done copy o f

th e foregoin g documen t

to : Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 60 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Wilbur WHgh t Buildin g - Suit

e 2W100 0 Washington , DC . 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docket Clerk . AGC-43 0

Name : Rrlji^ . &/nrQr .