alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-5045-N-32]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

 Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

August 11, 2006.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Room 7252, 451 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-7588.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                     v.                     *Veterans Administration*, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal building and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.                

Dated: August 3, 2006.

Mark R. Johnston,

Acting Deputy Assistant, Secretary for Special Needs.

[FR Doc. 06-6770  Filed 8-10-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-67-M
Skip to main content (Press Enter).

College of Information and Cyberspace National Defense University

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission & Vision             
  -  Faculty & Staff             
  -  Fact Sheet             
  -  Alumni             
  -  Internships             
  -  FAQ 
-  Admissions    -  Eligibility Requirements             
  -  Admissions Calendar             
  -  Application Instructions             
  -  Apply Online             
  -  International Students 
-  Academics    -  Graduate Catalog             
  -  M.S. in Strategic Information and Cyberspace Studies      -  JPME Master's Degree             
    -  Cyber Workforce Master's Degree (Part Time) 
  -  Leadership Development Programs             
  -  Graduate Certificates             
  -  Academic Partners 
-  Current Students    -  JPME II  Incoming Students             
  -  LDP Incoming Students             
  -  Student Registration             
  -  Bring Your Own Device             
  -  IA Compliance             
  -  Completion Procedures / Order Transcripts             
  -  Student Services and Resources 
-  Events    -  Cyber Beacon             
  -  Cyber PME Colloquium             
  -  Hopper Award             
  -  Lecture Series             
  -  CYBERCOM Symposium 
-  NEWS		 
-  UC2    -  About             
  -  Events             
  -  Work With Us 
-  Center for Cybersecurity    -  About             
  -  Cybersecurity Center POC             
  -  Cybersecurity Supporting Faculty             
  -  CAE-CDE CISO Certificate Program             
  -  Cybersecurity Trending News             
  -  Cyber Labs      -  Ethical Hacking             
    -  Critical Infrastructure - SCADA 
  -  Cyber Exercises      -  Tabletop Exercise             
    -  Cyber Competitions 
  -  Cyber Resources and Awareness             
  -  Stakeholder / Industry Advisory Council 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Directions             
  -  Access to Ft. McNair             
  -  Map of Ft. McNair 

HomeNEWSNews & Announcements

## News & Announcements

# iCollege Publishes Chapter in Book "Charting a Course: Strategic Choices for a New Administration" 

In the recently published book “Charting a Course: Strategic Choices for a New Administration” the iCollege’s faculty collaborated to publish Chapter 8 titled Cyber Policy. The aim of the chapter is to give guidance to the new administration in cyberspace arguing the next U.S. President must have a clear understanding of the relationship of technology, law, and policy in formulating options.
READ CHAPTER 8 HERE

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
# NEW CIC PUBLICATION: "ENABLING SUCCESSFUL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IMPLEMENTATION IN THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE"

/ Published Oct. 11, 2018

Check out CIC faculty member Dr. John Hurley's latest article covering the diverse challenges that come with the application of AI HERE.

#### Abstract:

The Pentagon sees Artificial Intelligence (AI) as a key enabler of future military operations. However, to secure the potential promise of AI, the Department of Defense (DoD) must address a number of challenges including technological diversity, cultural silos, and insufficient skillsets. The onset of what is perceived to be the next global ‘arms’ race will position ’the winner’ as the top superpower that could define and dictate future directions and priorities across the globe. One of the key areas of concern is in the area of cyber—the next major cyberattack is predicted to involve AI systems. There is growing concern that cyberattacks that utilise AI will be more efficient, more powerful, and more damaging in their impact. As a result, there is a great deal of concern among senior leaders on how to best position the DoD for the inevitable threats and expected attacks. This paper focuses on ways in which the DoD can use AI to better position itself for cyber events and challenges in the future.
Below please find the current online submittal form for the EROD –. This will be changed when 

we update the form to reflect recent organizational changes.

Current online submittal form: http://www.ed.gov/erod
No. 11-1147.

#### Snelling *v.*Evans et al.

C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   I, Jeffrey Flammang, Chief Executive Officer of eNotes Systems, Inc. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  1.  This Quarterly Report on 10QSB/A of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date:  September 14, 2006  /s/ Jeffrey Flammang _______________________  Jeffrey Flammang Chief Executive Officer
NAAQS and Other CAAImplementation UpdatesAnna Marie WoodDirector, Air Quality Policy DivisionFall 2014Office of Air Quality Planning and StandardsExceptionalEvents2ExceptionalEventsNextStepsRevisionstothe2007ExceptionalEventsRule(EER)◦WeanticipateproposingtheEERrevisionsinmid‐2015andpromulgatingEERrevisionsinmid‐2016◦ScheduleprovidesEERchangesinadvanceofimplementationactivitiesforanypotentialneworrevisedozoneNAAQSGuidancetoSupportDataExclusionRequestsforWildfire‐RelatedEventsthatMayAffectOzoneConcentrations◦ScheduleanticipatedtoparallelEERrevisioneffort◦FocusondemonstrationcomponentsandthetechnicaltoolsavailabletosupportEERcriteria3ExceptionalEventsRuleRevisionsPossibleAreasofFocusforRuleRevisions◦Clarifycertainruleelements:•Highwinddustevents•Historicalfluctuations•“Notreasonablycontrollableorpreventable”criterion•“Butfor”◦Clarifyfire‐relatedtermsandconceptsEPArecognizesthattherearefewreadily‐available,cost‐effectivetoolsthatairagenciescanusetosupportozone‐relatedexceptionaleventdemonstrationsundertheexistingEER.◦Weintendtoaddressthisgap4ExceptionalEventsinDesignationsEffortsExampleDatesforaPotential2015OzoneNAAQS(undera2‐yeardesignationsschedule)◦ByDecember1,2014 – EPAproposes2015OzoneNAAQS◦Mid‐2015‐EPAproposesExceptionalEventRulerevisions/guidance◦ByOctober1,2015 – EPApromulgates2015OzoneNAAQS◦Mid‐2016‐EPApromulgatesExceptionalEventRulerevisions/guidance◦October2016‐States/tribessubmitareaandboundaryrecommendationsbasedon2013‐2015data◦June2017‐EPAnotifiesstates/tribesre:anyintendedmodificationstotheirrecommendations(120‐dayletters)basedon2014‐2016data◦October2017‐EPApromulgatesfinalozoneareadesignations◦Potentialexceptionaleventschedule5AirQualityDataCollectedforCalendarYearEventFlagging&InitialDescriptionDeadlineDetailedDocumentationSubmissionDeadline2013and2014 July 2016 October20162015 July2016 October20162016 May 2017 May2017ExceptionalEvents(cont.)StatescontinuetoexpressconcernsaboutEEdemonstrationsOngoingdiscussionwithEPARegionsandstatestodeterminebestpracticesandlessonslearnedthusfar– whatworkedwellandwhatcouldworkbettertoaddressconcernsforEEdemonstrations◦Arethereopportunitiestofurtherstandardizeor“thindown”certainaspectsofEEdemonstrations?◦Howcanearlyandfrequentcoordinationandcommunication,betterclarityaboutregulatorysignificant,andtemplatesbeusedtoimproveprocessefficiency?◦ArethereotherprocessimprovementsortoolsEPAandstatesshouldconsider?ToolsandapproachesbasedonbestpracticesandlessonslearnedwillbeusedtocomplementtheEERulerevisions6QUESTIONSORCOMMENTS7
No. 11-5279.

#### Watley *v.*Mee, Administrator, East Jersey State Prison, et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
224P15

#### In the Matter of Foreclosure of the Deeds of Trust Executed by Grover C. Brown and Wife, Margaret C. Brown Dated April 1, 1980, Recorded in Book 949, Page 109, and Book 949, Page 111 of the Buncombe County Registry

1. Petitioners’ (Grover & Margaret Brown) PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA14-937)

1. Allowed

2. First Choice Title, LLC’s Conditional Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief

2. Allowed

3. Petitioners’ (Grover & Margaret Brown) Motion to Amend PDR

3. Allowed

4. Petitioners’ (Grover & Margaret Brown) Second Motion to Amend PDR

4. Allowed
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.245 Disqualification of presiding officer. ( a ) In the event that a presiding officer (other than the Commission) deems himself or herself disqualified and desires to withdraw from the case, the presiding officer shall immediately so notify the Commission.
( b ) Any party may request the presiding officer to withdraw on the grounds of personal bias or other disqualification. ( 1 ) The person seeking disqualification shall file with the presiding officer an affidavit setting forth in detail the facts alleged to constitute grounds for disqualification.
( 2 ) The presiding officer may file a response to the affidavit; and if the presiding officer believes he or she is not disqualified, he or she shall so rule and continue with the hearing proceeding.
( 3 ) The person seeking disqualification may appeal a ruling denying the request for withdrawal of the presiding officer, and, in that event, shall do so within five days of release of the presiding officer's ruling. Unless an appeal of the ruling is filed at this time, the right to request withdrawal of the presiding officer shall be deemed waived.
( 4 ) If an appeal of the ruling is filed, the presiding officer shall certify the question, together with the affidavit and any response filed in connection therewith, to the Commission. The hearing shall be suspended pending a ruling on the question by the Commission.
( 5 ) The Commission may rule on the question without hearing, or it may require testimony or argument on the issues raised.
( 6 ) The affidavit, response, testimony or argument thereon, and the Commission's decision shall be part of the record in the case.
(5 U.S.C. 556; 47 U.S.C. 154, 159, 208, 209, 214, 309, 312, 316, and 409)
[28 FR 12425, Nov. 22, 1963, as amended at 55 FR 36641, Sept. 6, 1990; 62 FR 4171, Jan. 29, 1997; 85 FR 63176, Oct. 6, 2020]
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            College of Information and Cyberspace
                    National Defense University
                CIC
        Search
                    Search CIC:
                        Search
                Search CIC:
                    Search
    Home

    About 
        Mission & Vision

    Faculty & Staff

    Fact Sheet

    Alumni

    Internships

    FAQ

    Admissions 
        Eligibility Requirements

    Admissions Calendar

    Application Instructions

    Apply Online

    International Students

    Academics 
        Graduate Catalog

    M.S. in Strategic Information and Cyberspace Studies
        
        JPME Master's Degree

    Cyber Workforce Master's Degree (Part Time)

    Leadership Development Programs

    Graduate Certificates

    Academic Partners

    Current Students 
        JPME II  Incoming Students

    LDP Incoming Students

    Student Registration

    Bring Your Own Device

    IA Compliance

    Completion Procedures / Order Transcripts

    Student Services and Resources

    Events
    
        Cyber Beacon

    Cyber PME Colloquium

    Hopper Award

    Lecture Series

    CYBERCOM Symposium

    NEWS

    UC2
    
        About

    Events

    Work With Us

    Center for Cybersecurity
    
        About

    Cybersecurity Center POC

    Cybersecurity Supporting Faculty

    CAE-CDE CISO Certificate Program

    Cybersecurity Trending News

    Cyber Labs
        
        Ethical Hacking

    Critical Infrastructure - SCADA

    Cyber Exercises
        
        Tabletop Exercise

    Cyber Competitions

    Cyber Resources and Awareness

    Stakeholder / Industry Advisory Council

    Contact 
        Contact Us

    Directions

    Access to Ft. McNair

    Map of Ft. McNair  Home
  NEWS
  News & Announcements
 News & Announcements News
 NDU iCollege Hosts Japanese Delegation By Patricia Coopersmith
 
 SHARE
 PRINT
 National Defense University


College of Information and Cyberspace

300 Fifth Ave., Bldg. 62
Fort Lesley J. McNair
Washington, DC 20319-5066

202-685-6300
                    Stay Connected
                
                
                DOD Privacy & Security
 DOD Links Disclaimer
 DOD Social Media Policy
 DOD Web Policy
 FOIA
 NDU System of Records Notice
 NDU Privacy & Security Notice
 No FEAR Act
 Open GOV
 Plain Writing Act
 Section 508
 Small Business Act
 USA.gov
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### § 5.125 Authorized points of communication.

Generally, stations in the Experimental Radio Service may communicate only with other stations licensed in the Experimental Radio Service. Nevertheless, upon a satisfactory showing that the proposed communications are essential to the conduct of the research project, authority may be granted to communicate with stations in other services and U.S. Government stations.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 99-4161 GABRIEL AGUILERA-GUTIERREZ, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-98-256) Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 8, 1999 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________ Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL Thomas N. Cochran, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Walter C. Holton, Jr., United States Attorney, Arnold L. Husser, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION PER CURIAM: Gabriel Aguilera-Gutierrez pled guilty to illegal re-entry by a deported alien, see 8 U.S.C.A. § 1326(a), (b)(2) (West 1999), and possession of a firearm by an illegal alien, see 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 922(g)(5), 924(a)(2) (West Supp. 1999). We affirm the conviction and sentence. Aguilera-Gutierrez's attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), raising as a potentially meritorious issue the district court's failure to depart below the guideline range pursuant to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2L1.2, comment. (n.5) (1998). Application Note 5 suggests that a downwarddeparture may be warranted when the defendant received an enhancement for having a prior conviction for an aggravated offense, but hasonly one such conviction, the prior offense was neither a crime of violence nor a firearms offense, and the prior sentence did not exceed one year. However, the district court's decision not to depart is not reviewable on appeal. See United States v. Bayerle , 898 F.2d 28, 31 (4th Cir. 1990). Pursuant to Anders , this court has reviewed the record for reversible error and found none. We therefore affirm the conviction and sentence. We deny counsel's motion to withdraw. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, then counsel may again move this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel's motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispensewith oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
|                                                |                    | State of           |   | Percent by |
|-----------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------------|--------|-----------------|
| Corporate Name                                 |                    | Organization            |   | iDNA, Inc. |
|                                                |                    |                    |   |            |
| ARAC,                Inc. (1)                       |                    | Delaware                |   | 100%            |
| Audience                Response Systems, Inc.      | New                York |                    | 100%   |
| Campus                Group Companies, Inc.         |                    | New                York |   | 100%            |
| iDNA                Cinemas Holdings, Inc.          |                    | Delaware                |   | 100%            |
| iDNA                Healthcare Communications, Inc. | Delaware                |                    | 100%   |
| Illumine                Entertainment, Inc.         |                    | Delaware                |   | 100%            |
| NAC,                Inc. (2)                        |                    | Delaware                |   | 100%            |
| National                Cinemas, Inc.               |                    | Delaware                |   | 100%            |
| OMI                Business Communications, Inc.    | Delaware                |                    | 100%   |
| Option                Technologies Interactive, LLC | Florida                 |                    | 100%   |
| ZoomLot                Corporation                  |                    | Delaware                |   | 100%            |

|   | (1) | Formerly                operated under the name of Agency Rent-A-Car and its divisions, Altra                Auto                Rental, Automate Auto Rental and National                Motors. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | NAC,                Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ARAC,                Inc. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
§ 32.2111 Land. ( a ) This account shall include the original cost of all land held in fee and of easements, and similar rights in land having a term of more than one year used for purposes other than the location of outside plant (see Accounts 2411 through 2441) or externally mounted central office equipment (see Accounts 2211 and 2212). It shall also include special assessments upon land for the construction of public improvements.
( b ) When land, together with buildings thereon, is acquired, the original cost shall be fairly apportioned between the land and the buildings and accounted for accordingly. If the plan of acquisition contemplates the removal of buildings, the total cost of the land and buildings shall be accounted for as the cost of the land, and the salvage value of the buildings when disposed of shall be deducted from the cost of the land so determined.
( c ) Annual or more frequent payments for use of land shall be recorded in the rent subsidiary record category for Account 6121, Land and Building Expense.
( d ) When land is acquired for which there is not a definite plan for its use in telecommunications service, its costs shall be included in Account 2006, Nonoperating Plant.
( e ) When land is acquired in excess of that required for telecommunications purposes, the cost of such excess land shall be included in Account 2006.
( f ) Installments of assessments for public improvement, including interest, if any, which are deferred without option to the company shall be included in this account only as they become due and payable. Interest on assessments which are not paid when due shall be included in Account 7500, Interest and related items.
( g ) When land is purchased for immediate use in a construction project, its cost shall be included in Account 2003, Telecommunications plant under construction, until such time as the project involved is completed and ready for service.
( h ) The original cost of leaseholds, easements, rights of way, and similar rights in land having a term of more than one year and not includable in Account 2111 shall be included in the accounts for outside plant or externally mounted central office equipment in connection with which the rights were acquired.
[51 FR 43499, Dec. 2, 1986, as amended at 67 FR 5686, Feb. 6, 2002]
#### § 215.2 Assignment of responsibilities.

The Executive Agent, NCS, shall be the focal point within the Federal Government for all EMP technical data and studies concerning telecommunications. It shall provide such data and the results of such studies to all appropriate agencies requesting them. It shall coordinate and approve EMP telecommunications tests and studies, and shall keep the National Security Advisor informed regarding such tests and studies being conducted and planned.