26438 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 87 / Friday, May 4, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 

copying at the Docket Management 

Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of 

Transportation, West Building Ground 

Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, 

between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, except Federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this rule, call or 

email the Bridge Administrator, Coast 

Guard Thirteenth District; telephone 

206–220–7282 email 

randall.d.overton@uscg.mil. If you have 

questions on viewing the docket, call 

Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, 

Docket Operations, telephone 202–366– 

9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Multnomah County has requested that 

the Hawthorne lift bridge remain closed 

to vessel traffic to facilitate safe, 

uninterrupted roadway passage of 

participants of the Rock-n-Roll Half 

Marathon event. The Hawthorne Bridge 

crosses the Willamette River at mile 

13.1 and provides 49 feet of vertical 

clearance above Columbia River Datum 

0.0 while in the closed position. Vessels 

which do not require a bridge opening 

may continue to transit beneath the 

bridge during this closure period. Under 

normal conditions this bridge operates 

in accordance with 33 CFR § 117.897 

which allows for the bridge to remain 

closed between 7 a.m. and 9 a.m. and 

4 p.m. and 6 p.m. Monday through 

Friday. This deviation period is from 

4 a.m. on May 20, 2012 through 10 a.m. 

May 20, 2012. The deviation allows the 

Hawthorne Bridge across the Willamette 

River, mile 13.1, to remain in the closed 

position and need not open for maritime 

traffic from 4 a.m. through 10 a.m. on 

May 20, 2012. The bridge shall operate 

in accordance to 33 CFR 117.897 at all 

other times. Waterway usage on this 

stretch of the Willamette River includes 

vessels ranging from commercial tug 

and barge to small pleasure craft. 

Mariners will be notified and kept 

informed of the bridge’s operational 

status via the Coast Guard Notice to 

Mariners publication and Broadcast 

Notice to Mariners as appropriate. The 

draw span will be required to open, if 

needed, for vessels engaged in 

emergency response operations during 

this closure period. 

In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), 

the drawbridge must return to its regular 

operating schedule immediately at the 

end of the designated time period. This 

deviation from the operating regulations 

is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35. 

Dated: April 24, 2012. 

Randall D. Overton, 

Bridge Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 2012–10750 Filed 5–3–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R03–OAR–2011–0889; FRL–9666–3] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; 

Maryland; Approval of 2011 Consent 

Decree To Control Emissions From the 

GenOn Chalk Point Generating Station; 

Removal of 1978 and 1979 Consent 

Orders 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final 

action to approve State Implementation 

Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the 

Maryland Department of the 

Environment (MDE) pertaining to the 

GenOn Chalk Point Generating Station 

(Chalk Point). These revisions approve 

specific provisions of a 2011 Consent 

Decree between MDE and GenOn to 

reduce particulate matter (PM), sulfur 

oxides (SOX), and nitrogen oxides (NOX) 

from Chalk Point. These revisions also 

remove the 1978 and 1979 Consent 

Orders for the Chalk Point generating 

station from the Maryland SIP as those 

Consent Orders have been superseded 

by the 2011 Consent Decree. EPA is 

approving these SIP revisions because 

the reductions of PM, SOX, and NOX are 

beneficial for reducing ambient levels of 

the PM, sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen 

dioxide (NO2) and ozone. They also 

reduce visible emissions from Chalk 

Point. This action is being taken under 

the Clean Air Act (CAA). 

DATES: This rule is effective on July 3, 

2012 without further notice, unless EPA 

receives adverse written comment by 

June 4, 2012. If EPA receives such 

comments, it will publish a timely 

withdrawal of the direct final rule in the 

Federal Register and inform the public 

that the rule will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID Number EPA– 

R03–OAR–2011–0889 by one of the 

following methods: 

A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

B. Email: spink.marcia@epa.gov 

C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2011–0889, 

Marcia L. Spink, Associate Director for 

Policy and Science, Air Protection 

Division, Mailcode 3AP00, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region III, 1650 Arch Street, 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. 

D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such 

deliveries are only accepted during the 

Docket’s normal hours of operation, and 

special arrangements should be made 

for deliveries of boxed information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2011– 

0889. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change, and may be 

made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through www.regulations.gov 

or email. The www.regulations.gov Web 

site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, 

which means EPA will not know your 

identity or contact information unless 

you provide it in the body of your 

comment. If you send an email 

comment directly to EPA without going 

through www.regulations.gov, your 

email address will be automatically 

captured and included as part of the 

comment that is placed in the public 

docket and made available on the 

Internet. If you submit an electronic 

comment, EPA recommends that you 

include your name and other contact 

information in the body of your 

comment and with any disk or CD–ROM 

you submit. If EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

EPA may not be able to consider your 

comment. Electronic files should avoid 

the use of special characters, any form 

of encryption, and be free of any defects 

or viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the 

electronic docket are listed in the 

www.regulations.gov index. Although 

listed in the index, some information is 

not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

is not placed on the Internet and will be 

publicly available only in hard copy 

form. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically in www.regulations.gov or 

in hard copy during normal business 

hours at the Air Protection Division, 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region III, 1650 Arch Street, 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. 


erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 87 / Friday, May 4, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 26439 

Copies of the State submittal are 

available at the Maryland Department of 

the Environment, 1800 Washington 

Boulevard, Suite 705, Baltimore, 

Maryland 21230. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Marcia L. Spink, Associate Director for 

Policy and Science, Air Protection 

Division, Project officer, (215) 814–2104 

or by email at spink.marcia@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

October 12, 2011, MDE submitted 

revisions to its SIP for the GenOn Chalk 

Point generating station located at 25100 

Chalk Point Road in Aquasco, 

Maryland. These revisions approve a 

2011 Consent Decree between MDE and 

GenOn to control PM, SOX and NOX

from Chalk Point. These revisions also 

remove the 1978 and 1979 Consent 

Orders for Chalk Point from the 

Maryland SIP as those Consent Orders 

have been superseded by the 2011 

Consent Decree. The purpose of the 

2011 Consent Decree is to address stack 

test violations at Chalk Point Unit #4. 

As part of the settlement with MDE, 

GenOn has agreed to combust natural 

gas in Units #3 and #4 for no less than 

75% of the annual heat input of the 

units, and for at least 95% of the ozone 

season (May 1st—September 30th) heat 

input instead of #6 fuel oil. Burning 

natural gas instead of #6 fuel oil results 

in a significant decrease in emissions of 

PM, SOX and NOX. These SIP revisions 

to reduce PM, SOX, and NOX emissions 

are beneficial for reducing ambient 

levels of the criteria pollutants PM, SO2, 

and NO2. As NOX is a precursor 

pollutant of ground level ozone, these 

reductions are also beneficial for 

reducing ambient levels of the criteria 

pollutant ozone. In addition, these 

revisions reduce visible emissions from 

Chalk Point. 

I. Background 

The Chalk Point generating station 

consists of four steam electric generating 

units located in Aquasco, Maryland 

which is part of Prince George County. 

Units #1 and #2 are coal fired baseload 

units each rated at 355 megawatts. Units 

#3 and #4 are cycling units permitted to 

burn natural gas and oil, each rated at 

640 megawatts. Consent Orders signed 

in 1978 and 1979 with the Potomac 

Electric Power Company (Pepco, the 

former owner) allowed Chalk Point 

Units #1–#3 to combust higher sulfur 

fuels than Maryland regulations allow 

and Unit #3 was also allowed to emit 

higher PM and visible emissions than 

Maryland regulations allow. In 2006, 

MDE and Pepco signed a Consent 

Decree to address opacity (visible 

emissions) violations from Chalk Point 

Units #3 and #4. That 2006 Consent 

Decree required Units #3 and #4 to burn 

natural gas during the ozone season for 

95% of the heat input. The 2006 

Consent Decree for Chalk Point also 

terminated the 1978 and 1979 Consent 

Orders with Pepco, effective May 1, 

2007. However, the Maryland SIP was 

not revised at that time to remove the 

1978 and 1979 Consent Orders and 

replace them with the 2006 Consent 

Decree. 

II. Summary of the SIP Revision 

In 2011, MDE and GenOn (new owner 

of Chalk Point) signed a Consent Decree, 

effective on March 10, 2011, for Chalk 

Point which amends, restates, and 

replaces the 2006 Consent Decree. On 

October 11, 2012, MDE submitted 

specific provisions of the 2011 Consent 

Decree to EPA for approval as a SIP 

revision. A copy of the provisions of the 

2011 Consent Decree for Chalk Point for 

which MDE is requesting approval as 

SIP revisions is included in the docket 

for this rulemaking. Hereafter in 

describing the SIP revision, EPA is 

referring to the provisions of the 2011 

Consent Decree that are being made part 

of the SIP. The October 11, 2012 SIP 

revision submittal from MDE also 

includes a request to remove the 1978 

and 1979 Consent Orders for Chalk 

Point from the Maryland SIP. 

Under the 2011 Consent Decree, 

Chalk Point Units #3 and #4 must burn 

natural gas for no less than 75% of the 

annual heat input of the units. In 

addition, the 2011 Consent Decree 

reiterates the 2006 Consent Decree’s 

requirement that Chalk Point Units #3 

and #4 use natural gas for at least 95% 

of the ozone season heat input. The 

2011 Consent Decree also requires Chalk 

Point to perform a stack test for PM 

while burning residual fuel oil in 2011, 

and to perform stack testing for PM from 

Units #3 and #4 any calendar year that 

either unit exceeds 570,000 MBTU from 

the burning of residual fuel oil. The 

2011 Consent Decree submitted for 

approval as a revision to the Maryland 

SIP also includes provisions for 

determining compliance, operating 

control equipment, determining the 

sulfur content of fuel, as well as 

recordkeeping and reporting 

requirements consistent with Federal 

regulations and the CAA. 

GenOn’s compliance with the 2006 

Consent Decree, the requirements of 

which are reiterated in the 2011 Consent 

Decree, have resulted in significant 

annual emission reduction benefits 

because of the shift to natural gas during 

the ozone season. In 2005, Chalk Point 

Units #3 and #4 emitted 3, 978 tons per 

year (TPY) of NOX, 744 TPY of PM, and 

12,379 TPY of sulfur oxides (SOX). In 

2008, as a result of compliance with the 

2006 Consent Decree, the requirements 

of which are reiterated in the 2011 

Consent Decree, Chalk Point Units #3 

and #4 emitted 446 TPY of NOX, 49 TPY 

of PM, and 244 TPY of sulfur oxides 

(SOX), thereby reducing annual 

emissions by 3,532 TPY, 695 TPY, and 

12,135 TPY, respectively. The 

additional provision of the 2011 

Consent Decree that requires Chalk 

Point Units #3 and #4 to maximize the 

use of natural gas during the non-ozone 

season will result in even further 

reductions of NOX, PM, and SOX and 

further reductions in visible emissions. 

III. Final Action 

EPA’s review of the SIP revisions 

submitted by MDE on October 12, 2011 

indicates that they strengthen the SIP 

requirements applicable to Chalk Point; 

result in significant emission reductions 

of NOX, PM, SOX and visible emissions; 

and meet all applicable Federal 

regulations and the CAA. The SIP 

revisions to remove the 1978 and 1979 

Consent Orders for Chalk Point are 

approvable as they have been 

superseded by the more stringent 2011 

Consent Decree. Therefore, EPA is 

approving the SIP revisions submitted 

by MDE on October 12, 2011. EPA is 

publishing this rule without prior 

proposal because the Agency views this 

as a noncontroversial amendment and 

anticipates no adverse comment. 

However, in the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’ 

section of today’s Federal Register, EPA 

is publishing a separate document that 

will serve as the proposal to approve the 

SIP revision if adverse comments are 

filed. This rule will be effective on July 

3, 2012 without further notice unless 

EPA receives adverse comment by June 

4, 2012. If EPA receives adverse 

comment, EPA will publish a timely 

withdrawal in the Federal Register 

informing the public that the rule will 

not take effect. EPA will address all 

public comments in a subsequent final 

rule based on the proposed rule. EPA 

will not institute a second comment 

period on this action. Any parties 

interested in commenting must do so at 

this time. 


erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
26440 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 87 / Friday, May 4, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

A. General Requirements 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act 

(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the state, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

B. Submission to Congress and the 

Comptroller General 

The Congressional Review Act, 

5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. Section 804, 

however, exempts from section 801 the 

following types of rules: rules of 

particular applicability; rules relating to 

agency management or personnel; and 

rules of agency organization, procedure, 

or practice that do not substantially 

affect the rights or obligations of nonagency parties. 5 U.S.C. 804(3). Because 

this is a rule of particular applicability, 

EPA is not required to submit a rule 

report regarding this action under 

section 801. 

C. Petitions for Judicial Review 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by July 3, 2012. Filing a petition 

for reconsideration by the Administrator 

of this final rule does not affect the 

finality of this action for the purposes of 

judicial review nor does it extend the 

time within which a petition for judicial 

review may be filed, and shall not 

postpone the effectiveness of such rule 

or action. Parties with objections to this 

direct final rule are encouraged to file a 

comment in response to the parallel 

notice of proposed rulemaking for this 

action published in the proposed rules 

section of today’s Federal Register, 

rather than file an immediate petition 

for judicial review of this direct final 

rule, so that EPA can withdraw this 

direct final rule and address the 

comment in the proposed rulemaking. 

This action to approve a 2011 Consent 

Decree between MDE and the GenOn to 

reduce particulate matter (PM), sulfur 

oxides (SOX), and nitrogen oxides (NOX) 

from Chalk Point may not be challenged 

later in proceedings to enforce its 

requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, 

Particulate matter, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur 

oxides. 

Dated: April 16, 2012. 

W.C. Early, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region III. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart V—Maryland 

■ 2. In § 52.1070, the table in paragraph 

(d) is amended by: 

■ a. Removing the entries for Potomac 

Electric Company (PEPCO)—Chalk 

Point Units #1 and #2 and Potomac 

Electric Company (PEPCO)—Chalk 

Point. 

■ b. Adding an entry for the GenOn 

Chalk Point Generating Station as the 

last entry in the table. 

The amendments read as follows: 

§ 52.1070 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(d) EPA approved state sourcespecific requirements. 


erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 87 / Friday, May 4, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 26441 

Name of source Permit No./type State effective 

date EPA approval date Additional explanation 

*******

GenOn Chalk Point Generating Station.The 2011 Consent Decree for Chalk Point.3/10/11 5/4/12 [Insert page 

number where the 

document begins].

Docket No. 52.1070(d). The SIP approval includes specific provisions of the 2011 Consent Decree for which the State of Maryland 

requested approval on October 12, 2011. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2012–10470 Filed 5–3–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R04–OAR–2012–0355(b); FRL–9666– 

7] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; North Carolina; 

Charlotte; Ozone 2002 Base Year 

Emissions Inventory 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final 

action to approve the ozone 2002 base 

year emissions inventory portion of the 

state implementation plan (SIP) revision 

submitted by the State of North Carolina 

November 12, 2009. The emissions 

inventory is part of the CharlotteGastonia-Rock Hill, North Carolina 

ozone attainment demonstration that 

was submitted for the 1997 8-hour 

ozone national ambient air quality 

standards (NAAQS). The CharlotteGastonia-Rock Hill, North CarolinaSouth Carolina 1997 8-hour ozone 

nonattainment area (hereafter referred to 

as the ‘‘bi-state Charlotte Area’’) is 

comprised of Cabarrus, Gaston, Lincoln, 

Mecklenburg, Rowan, Union and a 

portion of Iredell (Davidson and Coddle 

Creek Townships) Counties in North 

Carolina; and a portion of York County 

in South Carolina. This action is being 

taken pursuant to section 110 of the 

Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). EPA will 

take action on the South Carolina 

submission for the ozone 2002 base year 

emissions inventory for its portion of 

the bi-state Charlotte Area in a separate 

action. 

DATES: This direct final rule is effective 

July 3, 2012 without further notice, 

unless EPA receives adverse comment 

by June 4, 2012. If EPA receives such 

comments, it will publish a timely 

withdrawal of the direct final rule in the 

Federal Register and inform the public 

that the rule will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04– 

OAR–2012–0355(b), by one of the 

following methods: 

1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. Email: R4-RDS@epa.gov. 

3. Fax: (404) 562–9019. 

4. Mail: ‘‘EPA–R04–OAR–2012– 

0355(b),’’ Regulatory Development 

Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, 

Pesticides and Toxics Management 

Division, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street 

SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. 

5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Lynorae 

Benjamin, Regulatory Development 

Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, 

Pesticides and Toxics Management 

Division, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street 

SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Such 

deliveries are only accepted during the 

Regional Office’s normal hours of 

operation. The Regional Office’s official 

hours of business are Monday through 

Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding federal 

holidays. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R04–OAR–2012– 

0355(b). EPA’s policy is that all 

comments received will be included in 

the public docket without change and 

may be made available online at www.

regulations.gov, including any personal 

information provided, unless the 

comment includes information claimed 

to be Confidential Business Information 

(CBI) or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. Do 

not submit through www.regulations.gov 

or email, information that you consider 

to be CBI or otherwise protected. The 

www.regulations.gov Web site is an 

‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an email comment directly 

to EPA without going through www.

regulations.gov, your email address will 

be automatically captured and included 

as part of the comment that is placed in 

the public docket and made available on 

the Internet. If you submit an electronic 

comment, EPA recommends that you 

include your name and other contact 

information in the body of your 

comment and with any disk or CD–ROM 

you submit. If EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

EPA may not be able to consider your 

comment. Electronic files should avoid 

the use of special characters, any form 

of encryption, and be free of any defects 

or viruses. For additional information 

about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA 

Docket Center homepage at http://www.

epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm. 

Docket: All documents in the 

electronic docket are listed in the www.

regulations.gov index. Although listed 

in the index, some information is not 

publicly available, i.e., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

is not placed on the Internet and will be 

publicly available only in hard copy 

form. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically in www.regulations.gov or 

in hard copy at the Regulatory 

Development Section, Air Planning 

Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics 

Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA 

requests that if at all possible, you 

contact the person listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

schedule your inspection. The Regional 

Office’s official hours of business are 

Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, 

excluding federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sara 

Waterson, Regulatory Development 

Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, 

Pesticides and Toxics Management 

Division, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street 

SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. The 

telephone number is (404) 562–9061. 

Ms. Waterson can be reached via 

electronic mail at waterson.sara@epa.

gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

II. Analysis of State’s Submittal 

III. Final Action 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 


erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES