alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Cyber Leadership 

Graduate Certificate

The National Defense University (NDU) College of Information and Cyberspace (CIC) offers an 

accredited graduate certificate program in Cyber Leadership (Cyber-L), which focuses on developing the 

skills and desired leadership attributes necessary to be an effective strategic leader in the cyberspace 

domain. The program achieves this through a rigorous curriculum that enhances the understanding of all 

aspects of cyberspace and how to best integrate cyberspace with the other elements of national power to 

achieve the nation’s strategic objectives.

Important Facts:

• Tuition-Free for DoD Personnel 

(Military and Civilian)

• Fully Remote and Part-Time

• Self-Nominated

Minimum Admissions Eligibility Criteria:

• Bachelor’s Degree (3.0 GPA minimum)

• Federal civil service pay grade GS-13 or equivalent 

or above

• Military

• Enlisted: E7 and above

• Chief Warrant Officer: CW3 and above

• Officer: O4 and above

Courses Required (3 credit hours each)

CIC6219Cyber Essentials for 

Senior Leaders

CIC6221Cyberspace Activities and Authorities

CIC6443 Emerging and Disruptive Technologies

CIC6220 Emerging Partners and Adversaries through 

Diplomacy

CIC6330 National Security and Cyber Strategy

For more information refer to: 

Website: cic.ndu.edu

Phone number: 202-685-6300

Email: cicoss@ndu.edu

Attend our Monthly Virtual Open House for prospective students on the 4th Thursday of every month @ 1pm – 2pm EST 

https://us.bbcollab.com/guest/886062331bd3403f8bd9a2ac591ddc3a or +1-571-392-7650 PIN: 125 656 9347

Successful Cyber-L 

graduates will be able to: • Apply principles of strategic leadership, 

including innovative and criticalthinking, 

decision-making, and ethical conduct to 

achieve results-oriented organizational 

goals.

• Develop strategies to improve resilient, 

adaptable, agile, and productive 

government organizations focused on 

national security in the information age.

• Analyze the critical aspects of the humanmade terrain that underpins information 

and cyberspace operations to include the 

technology, law, and policy that supports 

that terrain.

• Evaluate collaboration strategies across 

organizational and cyberspace boundaries 

to leverage talent, resources, information 

technology, and opportunities to achieve 

mission success.

• Produce strategic-level oral, written, and 

visual communication.
# Portland State University

/ Published Nov. 27, 2023

Paper Info.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6383

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

PHILLIP AUBREY IRVING,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District

Judge. (7:04-cr-00078-jct)

Submitted: September 29, 2006 Decided: December 20, 2006

Before MICHAEL and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Phillip Aubrey Irving, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Albert Lustig,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Phillip Aubrey Irving seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying his motion for specific performance in his

criminal case. In criminal cases, the defendant must file the

notice of appeal within ten days after the entry of the order being

appealed. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A)(i). With or without a

motion, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause, the

district court may grant an extension of up to thirty days to file

a notice of appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v.

Reyes, 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985).

The district court entered its order on December 16,

2005. The notice of appeal was filed on February 9, 2006. Because

Irving failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an

extension of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We deny as

moot Irving’s motion to expedite this appeal. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 41467]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16833]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than July 28, 2000.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (W. Arthur Tribble, Vice 
President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. First-West Texas Bancshares, Inc., Midland, Texas; to acquire 
100 percent of the voting shares of First Pecos Bancshares, Inc., 
Midland, Texas, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of First 
National Bank, Pecos, Texas, First National Bank, Alpine, Texas, and 
First National Bank, Fort Stockton, Texas.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 28, 2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-16833 Filed 7-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### § 25.252 [Reserved]
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4637 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4637

  To assure compliance with the guarantees of the 5th, 14th, and 15th 
amendments to the Constitution by prohibiting the intentional creation 
     of legislative districts which favor or discriminate against 
 individuals based on the race, color, national origin, or language of 
                     voters within such districts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 23, 1994

 Mr. Bonilla introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To assure compliance with the guarantees of the 5th, 14th, and 15th 
amendments to the Constitution by prohibiting the intentional creation 
     of legislative districts which favor or discriminate against 
 individuals based on the race, color, national origin, or language of 
                     voters within such districts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION.

    It shall be unlawful for any State or political subdivision, in the 
establishment of districts for the election of members to any Federal, 
State, or local multi-member body with legislative functions, to create 
any such district with the intent to prevent or assure that a majority 
in that district are people of a particular race, color, or national 
origin, or who speak a particular language.

SEC. 2. CIVIL ACTION.

    Any person who is aggrieved by a violation of section 1 may, in a 
civil action, obtain appropriate relief.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Stamps.com Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kyle Huebner, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.




Date:
      May 10, 2010
            /s/
      KYLE HUEBNERKyle Huebner
              Chief
      Financial Officer
              (Principal Financial Officer)




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            College of Information and Cyberspace
                    National Defense University
                CIC
        Search
                    Search CIC:
                        Search
                Search CIC:
                    Search
    Home

    About 
        Mission & Vision

    Faculty & Staff

    Fact Sheet

    Alumni

    Internships

    FAQ

    Admissions 
        Eligibility Requirements

    Admissions Calendar

    Application Instructions

    Apply Online

    International Students

    Academics 
        Graduate Catalog

    M.S. in Strategic Information and Cyberspace Studies
        
        JPME Master's Degree

    Cyber Workforce Master's Degree (Part Time)

    Leadership Development Programs

    Graduate Certificates

    Academic Partners

    Current Students 
        JPME II  Incoming Students

    LDP Incoming Students

    Student Registration

    Bring Your Own Device

    IA Compliance

    Completion Procedures / Order Transcripts

    Student Services and Resources

    Events
    
        Cyber Beacon

    Cyber PME Colloquium

    Hopper Award

    Lecture Series

    CYBERCOM Symposium

    NEWS

    UC2
    
        About

    Events

    Work With Us

    Center for Cybersecurity
    
        About

    Cybersecurity Center POC

    Cybersecurity Supporting Faculty

    CAE-CDE CISO Certificate Program

    Cybersecurity Trending News

    Cyber Labs
        
        Ethical Hacking

    Critical Infrastructure - SCADA

    Cyber Exercises
        
        Tabletop Exercise

    Cyber Competitions

    Cyber Resources and Awareness

    Stakeholder / Industry Advisory Council

    Contact 
        Contact Us

    Directions

    Access to Ft. McNair

    Map of Ft. McNair  News
 UC2 Kickoff Event UC2
 The UC4 team at the NDU CIC hosted the inaugural UC2 Kickoff Event. The physical location of the event was the Hill Conference Room (Room #303) on the third floor of Roosevelt Hall at Fort McNair in Washington, D.C. 
 
Attendees included members of the Joint Staff J6, the NSA, USCYBERCOM, high-level DoD officials and staff members, a Congressional staff member, the NDU CIC Chancellor, the UC4 Director, and the Director of the UC2 Support Center. The keynote address was given by the Honorable Heidi Shyu, Under Secretary of Defense, Research and Engineering (OUSD(R&E)).
 SHARE
 PRINT
 Previous Story
 Next Story
 National Defense University


College of Information and Cyberspace

300 Fifth Ave., Bldg. 62
Fort Lesley J. McNair
Washington, DC 20319-5066

202-685-6300
                    Stay Connected
                DOD Privacy & Security
 DOD Links Disclaimer
 DOD Social Media Policy
 DOD Web Policy
 FOIA
 NDU System of Records Notice
 NDU Privacy & Security Notice
 No FEAR Act
 Open GOV
 Plain Writing Act
 Section 508
 Small Business Act
 USA.gov
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
392PA13-3

#### State v. Robert Timothy Walston, Sr.

1. State’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA12-1377-3)

1. Allowed 12/18/2015

2. State’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

2. Allowed

3. State’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

3. Allowed
§ 54.306 Alaska Plan for Rate-of-Return Carriers Serving Alaska. ( a ) *Election of support.* For purposes of subparts A, B, C, D, H, I, J, K and M of this part, rate-of-return carriers (as that term is defined in § 54.5) serving Alaska have a one-time option to elect to participate in the Alaska Plan on a state-wide basis. Carriers exercising this option shall receive the lesser of; ( 1 ) Support as described in paragraph (c) of this section or
( 2 ) $3,000 annually for each line for which the carrier is receiving support as of the effective date of this rule.
( b ) *Performance plans.* In order to receive support pursuant to this section, a rate-of-return carrier must be subject to a performance plan approved by the Wireline Competition Bureau. The performance plan must indicate specific deployment obligations and performance requirements sufficient to demonstrate that support is being used in the public interest and in accordance with the requirements adopted by the Commission for the Alaska Plan. Performance plans must commit to offer specified minimum speeds to a set number of locations by the end of the fifth year of support and by the end of the tenth year of support, or in the alternative commit to maintaining voice and Internet service at a specified minimum speeds for the 10-year term. The Bureau may reassess performance plans at the end of the fifth year of support. If the specific deployment obligations and performance requirements in the approved performance plan are not achieved, the carrier shall be subject to § 54.320(c) and (d).
( c ) *Support amounts and support term.* For a period of 10 years beginning on or after January 1, 2017, at a date set by the Wireline Competition Bureau, each Alaska Plan participant shall receive monthly Alaska Plan support in an amount equal to: ( 1 ) One-twelfth (1/12) of the amount of Interstate Common Line Support disbursed to that carrier for 2011, less any reduction made to that carrier's support in 2012 pursuant to the corporate operations expense limit in effect in 2012, and without regard to prior period adjustments related to years other than 2011 and as determined by USAC on January 31, 2012; plus
( 2 ) One-twelfth (1/12) of the total expense adjustment (high cost loop support) disbursed to that carrier for 2011, without regard to prior period adjustments related to years other than 2011 and as determined by USAC on January 31, 2012.
( d ) *Transfers.* Notwithstanding any provisions of § 54.305 or other sections in this part, to the extent an Alaska Plan participant (as defined in § 54.306 or § 54.317) transfers some or all of its customers in Alaska to another eligible telecommunications carrier, it may also transfer a proportionate amount of its Alaska Plan support and any associated performance obligations as determined by the Wireline Competition Bureau or Wireless Telecommunications Bureau if the acquiring eligible telecommunications carrier certifies it will meet the associated obligations agreed to in the approved performance plan.
[81 FR 69712, Oct. 7, 2016]
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  amended Quarterly Report of Palomar Enterprises,
Inc.,  a  Nevada  corporation  (the  "Company"), on Form 10-QSB/A for the period
ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date  hereof  (the  "Report"), I, Steven Bonenberger, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  March 9, 2005.

                                   By  /s/ Steven Bonenberger
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Steven Bonenberger,
                                     Chief Executive Officer of
                                     Palomar Enterprises, Inc.


<PAGE>
410P15

#### Joleando Lyndell Jones v. Harnett County District Court Jacqualyn L. Lee

Pit’s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Mandamus*

Denied
No. 11-5282.

#### Woods et ux. *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-2213

DAVID P. FARLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CHARLES F. MCDARRIS, Attorney for C.A.S.A., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-01-580-5-BO) Submitted: February 14, 2002 Decided: February 21, 2002 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David P. Farley, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: David P. Farley, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2000) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Farley v. McDarris , No. CA-01-580-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 20 & Sept. 25, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Revised Scheduling Conflicts Procedure - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"fAUaBc0tou\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/revised-scheduling-conflicts-procedure\/\">Revised Scheduling Conflicts Procedure<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/revised-scheduling-conflicts-procedure\/embed\/#?secret=fAUaBc0tou\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Revised Scheduling Conflicts Procedure” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"fAUaBc0tou\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Beginning January 2, 2019, the court will be changing its argument scheduling practices in an effort to reduce further the time between when a case is calendar-ready and is scheduled for oral argument.\u00a0 Full details of this change can be found here (pdf)."}