alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   Exhibit 10.20


                               DEED OF ASSIGNMENT


THIS DEED made this 4th day of August, 1999



BETWEEN  TELXON CORPORATION a Corporation of the State of Ohio of 3330 West
         Market Street, Akron, Ohio 44334-0582, United States of America (the
         Assignor)


AND      AIRONET WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. a Corporation of the State of
         Ohio, of 3875 Embassy Parkway, Akron, Ohio 44334-0292, United States of
         America (the Assignee)

RECITALS:


A.       The Assignor is the applicant for Australian Letters Patent under
         patent application No. 34854-97 (the application) in respect of an
         invention entitled CELLULAR SYSTEM HAND-OFF PROTOCOL (the Invention).

B.       The Assignor has agreed to assign to the Assignee and the Assignee
         desires to take assignment of all rights, title and interest of the
         Assignor in and to the Invention, the application and any patent
         granted pursuant thereto.



PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING and in consideration of the sum of ten dollars
($10.00) and for other valuable consideration paid to the Assignor by or on
behalf of the Assignee the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the Assignor assigns to the Assignee the whole right, title and
interest in and to the Invention, the application and any patent granted
pursuant thereto.

<PAGE>   2


EXECUTED as a Deed.

Signed on behalf of
TELXON CORPORATION


By: /s/ Glenn S. Hansen                       /s/ Suzanne M. Testerman
    -------------------------------           ---------------------------------
                                              Witness

Name:    Glenn S. Hansen

Title:   Vice President, Legal Administration



Signed on behalf of
AIRONET WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.



By: /s/ Roger J. Murphy                       /s/ Candy L. Mackey
    -------------------------------           ----------------------------------
                                              Witness:

Name:    Roger J. Murphy

Title:   President and CEO
No. 11-9284.

#### Harris *v.*PBC NBADL, LLC.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1384 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number, 

# ($3*6) ll-E-20

9 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/20088:42:12 AM

Sheet 249of 264P. 2 

# A-^51 . Mr . Jame s Ston e Pag e 1 CONTAC T REPOR T Perso n Calling :

Perso n Called :

Dat e o f Contact : Keith Barnet t

U.S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y OAQPS/ESD/OC G 919-541-560 5 Mr . Jame s Ston e Dur r Environmental , Inc . 321 3 Charlemagn e St . Charle s J X 630-587-996 0 Jun e 26 , 200 0 

## JAN I 9200 / EP A AI Rnnr^c r Contac t Summary : Ji mstate dtha t

th e regenerativ e thermal oxidizer s (RTO ) emi t 30-5 0 pp mo f

carbo n monoxid e at 150 0 °F . Thermal NO x emission s ar e 1 0 pp mo r less . Th e temperatur e a t Ake r Plastic s i s 1575°F . Concentrato r

system s hav e a

n overal l efficiency o f

9 6 t o 9 8 percent . Th e tur n dow n ratio s for air flow ar e 1/1 0 t o 1/15 . Th e RT O itsel f ha s a9 9 percen t

destructio n efficiency a

t 150 0 t o 157 5 ° F . Ther e ar e approximatel y 40 0 concentrato r system s installe di n th e U . S . Ther e ar e acoupl e o f fixedbe dzeolit e systems . Ther e i s anothe r Dur r rotar y concentrato r

syste mstartin g u p a t

Lon g Beach , but

it i s probabl y o n th e pain t

lint only . Mos t o f th e existin g system s ar e surfac e finishing operations . Th e VO C level s in th e exhaus t ar e 20 0 pp mi f

aspray booth , bu t

ar e usuall y muc h lower . The y hav e installe dsystem s a t pp mlevel s a s hig h a s 80 0 ppm . On e hundre dpp mlevel s ar e real common . Automate dspray booth s ten dt o hav e highe r

pp mlevel s in th e exhaust . Cor e material s only control s th e agin g roo mwit h thei r add-o n control . A lo t o f surfac e coatin g facilitie s hav e permanen t tota l enclosures .
No. 11-5403.

#### Myles *v.*Maryland.

Ct. Sp.'App. Md. Certio-rari denied.
792 A.2d 408

#### IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL J. WEINTRAUB, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 271251971).

March 20, 2002.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 01-040, concluding that MICHAEL J. WEIN-TRAUB, formerly of FLEMINGTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1971, and who has been ineligible to practice law since September 21, 1998, for failure to pay the annual assessment to the New Jersey Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection as required by *Rule*1:28-2, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months for violating *RPC*1.5(b)(failure to communicate in writing the basis of a fee), *RPC*1.15(b)(failure to safekeep client’s property), *RPC*1.8(a)(conflict of interest, prohibited transaction) and *RPC*8.4(c)(conduet involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MICHAEL J. WEINTRAUB is suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months and until the further Order of the Court, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of suspension and that respondent comply with *Rule*1:20-20; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of E-LOAN, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Christian
A. Larsen, as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company,
and Matthew Roberts, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Matthew Roberts Matthew Roberts
Chief Financial Officer

August 13, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to E-LOAN, Inc. and will be retained by E-LOAN, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
#### IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN G. COX.

(Supreme Court Disciplinary Nos. 448, 460, 754)

(385 SE2d 413)

Decided September 28, 1989.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, Paul B. Cohen, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

*Neely & Player, Charles S. Johnson III,*for Cox.

Per curiam.

Martin G. Cox petitioned the State Disciplinary Board for voluntary suspension of his license to practice law for a period of two years and, following the suspension, that a third party be appointed to handle all trust funds related to his law practice. The State Disciplinary Board voted to accept the voluntary two-year suspension for violations of Standard 65 of Rule 4-102 and to require petitioner to take the Multi-State Professional Responsibility Examination portion of the Georgia State Bar Examination and to pass the exam.

The violations of Standard 65 resulted from transactions involving the escrow account of Cox & Richard, P.C. The withdrawals caused the account balance to fall below the amount owed to the firm’s clients. The clients have been repaid in full.

Upon review, it is ordered that Cox is suspended from the practice of law for two years, to be readmitted upon his taking and passing the Multi-State Professional Responsibility Examination portion of the Georgia State Bar Examination.

*All the Justices concur.*
#### § 24.3 Permissible communications.

PCS licensees may provide any mobile communications service on their assigned spectrum. Fixed services may be provided on a co-primary basis with mobile operations. Broadcasting as defined in the Communications Act is prohibited.

[61 FR 45356, Aug. 29, 1996]
No. 11-9692.

No. 11-9833.

#### Rana *v.*Department of the Army. Thomas *v.*Ritz Condominium Assn., Inc.

C. A. Fed. Cir.; and

Super. Ct. N. J., App. Div. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*denied. Petitioners are allowed until June 19, 2012, within which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Annual Report of Concierge Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Allen E. Kahn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  October 8, 2010

/s/ Allen E. KahnAllen E. KahnChief Financial Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Concierge Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Concierge Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

DoD, Per Diem, Travel and Transportation Allowance Committee.

# ACTION:

Notice of Revised Non-Foreign Overseas Per Diem Rates.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Per Diem, Travel and Transportation Allowance Committee is publishing Civilian Personnel Per Diem Bulletin Number 248. This bulletin lists revisions in the per diem rates prescribed for U.S. Government employees for official travel in Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands and Possessions of the United States. AEA changes announced in Bulletin Number 194 remain in effect. Bulletin Number 248 is being published in the                         **Federal Register**                         to assure that travelers are paid per diem at the most current rates.                    

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         August 1, 2006.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    This document gives notice of revisions in per diem rates prescribed by the Per Diem Travel and Transportation Allowance Committee for non-foreign areas outside the continental United States. It supersedes Civilian Personnel Per Diem Bulletin Number 247. Distribution of Civilian Personnel Per Diem Bulletins by mail was discontinued. Per Diem Bulletins published periodically in the                     **Federal Register**                     now constitute the only notification of revisions in per diem rates to agencies and establishments outside the Department of Defense. For more information or questions about per diem rates, please contact your local travel office. The text of the Bulletin follows:                

Dated: August 2, 2006.

C.R. Choate,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 45532)          ( print page 45533)          ( print page 45534)          ( print page 45535)          ( print page 45536)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[FR Doc. 06-6796 Filed 8-8-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of AUG CORP. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2001, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Laurence S. Isaacson, principal executive officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


By: /s/Laurence S. Isaacson
    -----------------------
    Laurence S. Isaacson

December 5, 2002
Course 

Number Course Title Credits

Year 1

6168 Senior Leader Foundation 3

6167 Foundations of the Information Environment 3

6159 National Security Strategy 3

Year 2

6171 Governance of the Global Information 

Environment and Cyber Domain 3

6151 Information Warfare Strategy 3

6443 Emerging and Disruptive Technologies 3

Year 3

6154 International Challenges in Cyberspace 3

6166 Strategic Competition in the Information 

Environment 

3

6164 Strategic Thinking and Communication 3

Electives (3 courses)

XXXX Elective 3

XXXX Elective 3

XXXX Elective 3

Note: Strategic Thinking and Communication must be the last class 

Note: Electives can be taken at any point within the programs.

Strategic Information and Cyberspace Studies 

College of Information and Cyberspace 

National Defense University

Fort McNair, Washington D.C. 20319-5066
Academic Year 2024-2025
No. 11-9485.

#### Flowers *v.*Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
8/13/12 ArcGIS Online

www.arcgis.com/home/index.html 1/1

Esri.com | Terms of Use | Privacy | Contact Us | Report Abuse

Featured Maps

Make a Map »

Create a map that can be viewed in a browser, desktop or mobile

device. Share it on a blog, via email, or embed it in a website.

World Topographic Map Updates

August 13, 2012

The update includes content from the user community in the

US and Canada.

Get a free ArcGIS Online account and start

making web maps today.

SSiiggnn--uupp nnooww Featured Videos »

Watch these short videos to quickly get

started making maps and apps.

ArcGIS Online for Developers »

Build custom web and mobile applications that

incorporate your maps and data.

Create and Collaborate

on Maps and Apps

ArcGIS Online is a cloud-based,

collaborative content management system

for maps, apps, data, and other

geographic information.

Learn More »

Resource Center Show: Web Content Only Help Sign In

Find maps, applications and more...

Mapping the 2012

Medals

Oce an Basemap National Ge ographic Map Light Gray Canvas
#### § 3.1 Scope, basis, purpose.

By these rules the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is delineating its responsibilities in certifying and monitoring accounting authorities in the maritime mobile and maritime mobile-satellite radio services. These entities settle accounts for public correspondence due to foreign administrations for messages transmitted at sea by or between maritime mobile stations located on board ships subject to U.S. registry and utilizing foreign coast and coast earth station facilities. These rules are intended to ensure that settlements of accounts for U.S. licensed ship radio stations are conducted in accordance with the International Telecommunication Regulations (ITR), taking into account the applicable ITU-T Recommendations.
No. 11-5586.

#### Champion *v.*United States.

Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 27, 1999 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 27, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-29-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1999
<CASH>                                          20,178
<SECURITIES>                                     1,355
<RECEIVABLES>                                      130
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        479
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,840
<PP&E>                                          28,310
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,310)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,892
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,273
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,658
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,892
<SALES>                                         16,322
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,322
<CGS>                                            4,716
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,719
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (48)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    657
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (263)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                657
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       394
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05


</TABLE>
#### Bruce C. NOBLE, Appellant, v. IOWA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Sued as: The State Iowa Department of Corrections, Appellee.

No. 03-2281.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 6, 2004.

Decided March 16, 2004.

Bruce C. Noble, Mount Pleasant, I A, pro se.

H. Loraine Wallace, Attorney General’s Office, Des Moines, IA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before BYE, MCMILLIAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

*186PER CURIAM.

Bruce C. Noble appeals the district court’s1 judgment entered upon an adverse jury verdict in his employment-discrimination action. Noble has not provided a complete trial transcript, but he raises issues concerning his religious reservations about taking an oath before testifying, his belief that he did not have an opportunity to present rebuttal testimony because the trial was “rushed,” and his view that a defense witness lied at trial.

We have carefully reviewed the record before us, as well as the parties’ submissions on appeal, and we conclude that Noble’s contentions do not provide a basis for reversal. *See TRI, Inc. v. Boise Cascade Office Products, Inc.,*315 F.3d 915, 920 (8th Cir.) (party must bring issue to district court’s attention to preserve issue for appeal), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 2655, 156 L.Ed.2d 659 (2003); *Briley v. Carlin,*172 F.3d 567, 571 (8th Cir.1999) (declining to address arguments raised for first time on appeal); *Kramer v. Logan County School District No. R-1,*157 F.3d 620, 624-25 (8th Cir.1998) (appeals court does not lightly overturn jury verdict, and leaves credibility determinations to jury).

Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R, 47B.

1

. The Honorable Robert W. Pratt, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa.
# Recent Research Activity 

/ Published Dec. 5, 2017

On 2 August, Dr. Cathryn Downes, CIC Professor, presented her paper entitled “Needs for Cyber Education and Education in a Cyber Age” at the National Training and Simulation Association/DoD Advanced Distributed Learning Initiative iFest Conference.

On 18 August, Dr. Downes gave a lecture entitled “Building and Sustaining Ministry Strategic Management Capacity” to the Defense Security and Cooperation Agency’s Global and Afghanistan Ministry of Defense Advisers Course 24 in Washington, D.C.
No. 11-5100.

#### West *v.*United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certio-rari denied.
#### J. S. Edwards, *Plaintiff in Error,*vs. C. Carroll *Defendant in Error.*

143 So. 300.

Division A.

Decision filed August 2, 1932.

*Wm. Beardall*and *Maguire <& Toorhis,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*312*Dielcinsdn & DieJcinson,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.