alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 11-7610.

No. 11-7648.

No. 11-8207.

No. 11-8323.

No. 11-8492.

No. 11-8599.

No. 11-8603.

No. 11-8611.

#### Brown *v.*Collins et al., Stevenson *v.*New York Department of Correctional Services, Walton *v.*Alston et al., Conley *v.*Keys et al., Benson *v.*Tibbals, Warden, Weston *v.*Illinois, D’Antuono *v.*Bradt, Superintendent, Attica Correctional Facility, Shabazz *v.*United States, *1032Tiburcio *v.*Obama, President of the United States, Vasquez *v.*United States,

*1031565 U. S. 1206;

565 U. S. 1168;

565 U. S. 1265;

565 U. S. 1267;

*ante,*p. 911;

*ante,*p. 925;

*ante,*p. 925;

*ante,*p. 925;

*1032No. 11-8897.

No. 11-9099.

*ante,*p. 947; and

*ante,*p. 929. Petitions for rehearing denied.
**CERTIFICATE      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));                and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of the dates and for the periods covered by the                Report. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| March                28, 2008 | /s/                Kyle C. Cook                      |
|-------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                          | Kyle                C. Cook                          |
|                          | Chief                Financial Officer and Treasurer |

----
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except under the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 50278 C onfer enc e Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee v. J U A N A N T O N IO M A R T IN E Z -R O D R IG U E Z , D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e W est ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 1: 09- C R
- 2- 1 B ef ore K IN G , JO L L Y , an d S O U T H W IC K , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * Th e at t or ney appoi nt ed t o r epr es ent Juan A nt oni o M a rti n ez - R odr i guez has m o ve d f o r l e av e t o w i t hdr aw a nd has f i l e d a b r i e f

i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A nder s v. C a lif o rn ia , 386 U . S . 738 ( 196 7) . M art i n ez- R odri gu ez ha s not f i l ed a respon se. O uri nde pe nde ntr e vi e w o f t he r e c o r d a nd c o uns e l ’ s b r i e f di s c l ose s no n on frivo l ou s i s s u e f or a p p ea l . A ccord i n gly, cou n sel’ s m oti on f or leav e to w i t hdr aw i s G RA N TE D , c o uns e li s e xc us e d f r o m f ur t he rre s po ns ibi l i t i e s he r e i n, a n d th e A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D . S ee5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December

15, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
200P15-2

#### State v. Kevin Mitchell

Defs *Pro Se*Motion to Dismiss

Dismissed
792 A.2d 1239

#### IN THE MATTER OF ELISSA L. INSLER, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

March 7, 2002.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court in DRB 01-079, recommending that by way of reciprocal discipline, ELISSA L. INSLER, formerly of JERSEY CITY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1987, be disbarred, respondent having been disbarred in the State of New York for the knowing misappropriation of client trust funds;

*139And ELISSA L. INSLER having failed to appear on the return date of the Order to Show Cause issued in this matter;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ELISSA L. INSLER be disbarred, effective immediately, and that her name be stricken from the roll of attorneys;

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by ELISSA L. INSLER pursuant to *Rule*1:21-6 shall be restrained from disbursement except on application to this Court for good cause shown and shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court, who is directed to deposit the funds in the Superior Court Trust Fund pending further Order of this Court;

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that ELISSA L. INSLER be and hereby is permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
§ 54.1302 Calculation of incumbent local exchange carrier portion of nationwide loop cost expense adjustment for rate-of-return carriers. ( a ) Beginning January 1, 2013, and each calendar year thereafter, the total annual amount of the incumbent local exchange carrier portion of the nationwide loop cost expense adjustment shall not exceed the amount for the immediately preceding calendar year, multiplied times one plus the Rural Growth Factor calculated pursuant to § 54.1303. Beginning January 1, 2021, and each calendar year thereafter, the base amount of the nationwide loop cost expense adjustment shall be the annualized amount of the final six months of the preceding calendar year. The total amount of the incumbent local exchange carrier portion of the nationwide loop cost expense adjustment for the first six months of the calendar year shall be the base amount divided by two and for the second six months of the calendar year shall be the base amount divided by two, multiplied times one plus the Rural Growth Factor calculated pursuant to § 54.1303.
( b ) The annual rural incumbent local exchange carrier portion of the nationwide loop cost expense adjustment shall be reduced to reflect the transfer of rural incumbent local exchange carrier access lines that are eligible for expense adjustments pursuant to § 54.1310. The reduction shall equal the amount of the § 54.1310 expense adjustment available to the transferred access lines at the time of the transfer and shall be effective in the next calendar quarter after the access lines are transferred.
( c ) Safety net additive support calculated pursuant to § 54.1304, and transferred high-cost support and safety valve support calculated pursuant to § 54.305 of this part shall not be included in the rural incumbent local exchange carrier portion of the annual nationwide loop cost expense adjustment.
[79 FR 39190, July 9, 2014, as amended at 89 FR 25163, Apr. 10, 2024]
No. 11-5431.

#### Green *v.*Rhee et al.

Ct. App. D. C. Certio-rari denied.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 By The Chief Financial Officer,

As Adopted
Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002.

I, F. Clay Creasey, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of Toys R Us, Inc. (the
Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended February 2, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ F. Clay Creasey, Jr.                                               
|F. Clay Creasey, Jr. Executive Vice President -
Chief Financial Officer
|(Principal Financial Officer)                                          
|May 2, 2008
§ 54.630 Election to offset support against annual universal service fund contribution. ( a ) A service provider that contributes to the universal service support mechanisms under this subpart and subpart H of this part to eligible health care providers may, at the election of the contributor: ( 1 ) Treat the amount eligible for support under this subpart as an offset against the contributor's universal service support obligation for the year in which the costs for providing eligible services were incurred; or
( 2 ) Receive direct reimbursement from the Administrator for that amount.
( b ) Service providers that are contributors shall elect in January of each year the method by which they will be reimbursed and shall remain subject to that method for the duration of the calendar year. Any support amount that is owed a service provider that fails to remit its monthly universal service contribution obligation shall first be applied as an offset to that contributor's contribution obligation. Such a service provider shall remain subject to the offsetting method for the remainder of the calendar year in which it failed to remit its monthly universal service obligation. A service provider that continues to be in arrears on its universal service contribution obligations at the end of a calendar year shall remain subject to the offsetting method for the next calendar year.
( c ) If a service provider providing services eligible for support under this subpart elects to treat that support amount as an offset against its universal service contribution obligation and the total amount of support owed exceeds its universal service obligation, calculated on an annual basis, the service provider shall receive a direct reimbursement in the amount of the difference. Any such reimbursement due a service provider shall be provided by the Administrator no later than the end of the first quarter of the calendar year following the year in which the costs were incurred and the offset against the contributor's universal service obligation was applied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                           6,663
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,889
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,931
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,204
<PP&E>                                             843
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  86,341
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          257,886
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,170
<OTHER-SE>                                   (188,715)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    86,341
<SALES>                                         60,531
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                60,531
<CGS>                                           67,636
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  200,698
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (139,069)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (139,869)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (139,869)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
No. 92-1364.

#### Cassidy et al. *v.*Western Systems, Inc., et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>          5
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               61,972,210
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,381,000
<INVENTORY>                                 37,063,615
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           115,755,520
<PP&E>                                     687,751,931
<DEPRECIATION>                             247,563,173
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             676,979,586
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       54,035,325
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,253,332
<OTHER-SE>                                 136,267,499
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               676,979,586
<SALES>                                    115,273,434
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           146,832,582
<CGS>                                       73,077,132
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              126,230,668
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               498,321
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          15,130,897
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,415,581
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,734,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,681,581
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,681,581
<EPS-BASIC>                                      $0.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.74

</TABLE>
TO: 

FROM: 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, DC 20460 

RECEIPT OF DELIVERY 

DATE: 01120/2016 

The Honorable Paul Ryan 

Speaker of the House of Representatives 

The Capitol, H-209 

Washington, D.C. 20515 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW 1803A 

Washington, DC 20460 

Dear Mr. Speaker, 

TITLE(S) OF DOCUMENTS: 

I. Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Colorado; Revisions to Common 

Provisions and Regulation Number 3; Correction [FRL # 9941-46-Region 8, Region 8] Final Rule 

2. Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plan Revisions; Rules, Public Notice and 

Comment Process, and Renumbering; Utah [FRL # 9932-59-Region 8, Region 8] Direct Final Rule 

3. Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, monoester with 2,2,4-trimethyl-1 ,3-pentanediol; Exemption from the 

Requirement of a Tolerance [FRL # 9941-17-0CSPP, OCSPP] Final Rule 

) 

.......... ' / 

RECEIVED BY: ___,_<:_.. l _ l..::.... ·_·' ~~L=- =---------

i 
TO: 

FROM: 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, DC 20460 

RECEIPT OF DELIVERY 

The Honorable Joseph Biden, Jr. 

President of the Senate 

The Capitol, S-212 

Washington, D.C. 20510 

DATE: 01/20/2016 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW 1803A 

Washington, DC 20460 

Dear Mr. Vice President, 

TITLE(S) OF DOCUMENTS: 

I. Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Colorado; Revisions to Common 

Provisions and Regulation Number 3; Correction [FRL # 9941-46-Region 8, Region 8] Final Rule 

2. Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plan Revisions; Rules, Public Notice and 

Comment Process, and Renumbering; Utah [FRL # 9932-59-Region 8, Region 8] Direct Final Rule 

3. Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, monoester with 2,2,4-trimethyl-1 ,3-pentanediol; Exemption from the 

Requirement of a Tolerance [FRL # 9941-17-0CSPP, OCSPP] Final Rule 

RECEIVEDBYk ~ Date: )/zo//v 
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, DC 20460 

RECEIPT OF DELIVERY 

DATE: 01/20/2016 

Receipt of Delivery 

TO: 

FROM: 

General Cow1sel 

Govemment Accountability Office 

Room 7175 

441 G Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20548 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW 1803A 

Washington, DC 20460 

TITLE(S) OF DOCUMENTS: 

I. Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans: Colorado: Revisions to Common 

Provisions and Regulation Number 3: Correction [FRL # 994 1-46-Region 8. Region 8) Final Rule 

2. Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plan Revisions; Rules. Public Notice and 

Comment Process, and Renumbering; Utah (FRL # 9932-59-Region 8. Region 8] Direct Final Rule 

3. Propanoic acid. 2-methyl-. monoester with 2,2,4-trimethyl-1 ,3-pentancdiol: Exemption from the 

Requirement of a Tolerance (FRL # 994 1-1 7-0CSPP, OCSPP] Final Rule 

RECEIVED BY: '\k?/ {_~ Date: 20-20 /}:;
No. 11-5634.

#### Wood *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certio-rari denied.
----- Forwarded by Jaime Pagan/RTP/USEPA/US on 07/14/2008 10:30 AM -----

"Farr, Clint J

(DEC)"

<clint.farr@alas To

ka.gov> Jaime Pagan/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA,

Michael Horowitz/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

07/10/2008 08:03 cc

PM "Farr, Clint J (DEC)"

<clint.farr@alaska.gov>, "Mello,

Christopher P (AIDEA)"

<cmello@aidea.org>, "Edwards,

Alice L S (DEC)"

<alice.edwards@alaska.gov>

Subject

Request deadline extension for

developing an alternative plan

for rural Alaska public electric

utilities to transition to ultra

low sulfur diesel

Dear Mr. Pagan,

On January 11, 2008, ADEC sent EPA a letter asking for more time to recommend

a final plan to address Alaska's concerns with the New Source Performance

Standards for stationary compression ignition, internal combustion engines.

Two dates were outlined in the letter:

- an April 11, 2008 deadline to provide an alternative plan for rural Alaska

public-sector electric utilities to comply with the fuel transition provisions

of the NSPS rule;

- a July 11, 2008 deadline for ADEC to provide an alternative plan for rural

Alaska public-sector electric utilities to comply with the emission standards

of the NSPS rule.

On April 10, 2008, ADEC sent an email to EPA requesting an extension to July

11, 2008 for providing alternative plans for compliance with the fuel

transition provisions. The Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation now

wishes to extend the deadline again for providing a final recommendation to

transition rural Alaska to ultra low sulfur diesel. After your trip to Alaska

and the final release of the cost assessment, we need more time for input from

impacted parties. We wish to extend the deadline for a transition plan to

October 31st 2008. Chris Mello of the Alaska Energy Authority and I intend to

come to Washington D.C. and North Carolina in September with a recommendation

for discussion. An October 31 deadline will give us some time after this trip

to address EPA's final thoughts and concerns.

Do not hesitate to call me with your thoughts and concerns.

Take care,

Clint Farr

Division of Air Quality, Area Source Section Manager Alaska Department of

Environmental Conservation 410 Willoughby Avenue, Suite 303 Juneau, AK 99801-

1795 Phone - 907-465-5127 Fax - 907-465-5129 clint.farr@alaska.gov
#### § 5.502 Eligibility.

Compliance testing experimental radio licenses may be granted to those testing laboratories recognized by the FCC as being competent to perform measurements of equipment for equipment authorization.
#### Edward Thomas SEYMOUR, III, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Deputy BASHAM; Deputy Botteler; John A. Bartlett, Jr., Calvert County Sheriff; R.A. Figueris, Deputy, Badge # 1215; A.C. Moschetto, Deputy, Badge #4341; Calvert County Sheriffs Office; Deputys Name in Statement; Deputys Depicted But Unknown, Defendants— Appellees, and Lisa Ridge, Assistant States Attorney; Sheila Sullivan, Assistant Public Defender; Unknown Participating Officers in A & B Arrest, Defendants.

No. 04-6140.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 11, 2004.

Decided March 19, 2004.

Edward Thomas Seymour, III, Appellant pro se. John Francis Breads, Jr., Local Government Insurance Trust, Columbia, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

*51Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Edward Thomas Seymour, III appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Seymour v. Basham,*Nos. CA-03-1009-1-MJG; CA-03-1138-1-MJG (D.Md. filed Dec. 23, 2003 *&*entered Dec. 24, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
Skip Navigation

USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Woods Hole Science Center

##### GIS of Selected Geophysical and Core Data in the Northern Gulf of    Mexico  Continental Slope Collected by the U.S. Geological Survey

----

Skip Navigation
AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |		U.S. Geological Survey		URL: woodshole.er.usgs.gov/pubs/of2005-1071/htmldocs/figure4.htm		Page Contact Information: WHSC Webmaster		This page last modified on Tuesday, 25-Aug-2009 14:54:09 EDT
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of E-LOAN, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Mark E. Lefanowicz,
as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,
hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Mark E. LefanowiczMark E. Lefanowicz
Chief Executive Officer and President

March 25, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to E-LOAN, Inc. and will be retained by E-LOAN, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---