alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
702 P.2d 1356

#### Elizabeth SCHIESS, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Peter BATES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 15239.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

July, 23 1985.

ORDER

Prior report: 107 Idaho 794, 693 P.2d 440.

The Court having entered an Order on June 18, 1985, 108 Idaho 715, 701 P.2d 663, recalling the REMITTITUR previously issued by this Court on January 2, 1985, and granting Appellants’ PETITION FOR REHEARING and counsel for the parties having filed a STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL on July 1, 1985; and the Court being fully advised; therefore, good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that counsel’s STIPULATION for dismissal of PETITION FOR REHEARING be, and hereby is, APPROVED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellants’ PETITION FOR REHEARING filed June 18, 1985, be, and hereby is, WITHDRAWN and the REMITTITUR shall reissue as of the date of this Order.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Ecuity,  Inc., a Nevada  corporation
(the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2004 as filed
with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I, King Cole,
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to MY knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ KING COLE
    -----------------
    King Cole
    President
    November 12, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 16 (Tuesday, January 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 3975]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1674]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[MT-070-00-1020-PA]


Montana; Scratchgravel Hills Area Recreation Management 
Restrictions

AGENCY:  Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION:  Updating Scratchgravel Hills Area Recreation Management 
Restrictions.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  Under authority of 43 CFR 8364.1 and as a result of the 
approval of the Scratchgravel Hills Cooperative Agreement on July 11, 
1985, the following restrictions for the use of the Scratchgravel 
Hills, adjacent to Helena, Montana, became effective August 15, 1985:
    1. The use, possession afield, or discharge of all firearms is 
prohibited year-round in the Scratchgravel Hills, except during such 
big game seasons as may be established by the Montana Department of 
Fish, Wildlife, and Parks.
    2. The possession and use of fireworks is prohibited year-round.
    To comply with requests from the Helena Interagency Fire Dispatch 
Center, Lewis and Clark County Sheriff Department, local fire districts 
and Scratchgravel Hills residents, this notice adds the following 
restriction:
    3. The building, maintaining, attending or using a campfire, 
charcoal fire, cooking fire or warming fire is prohibited year-round.

Principal Meridian, Montana

    These regulations apply to public lands in:
T. 11 N., R. 4 W.,
Secs. 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 33, 34, 35, and 36.
T. 10 N., R. 4 W.,
Secs. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.

    The purpose of these restrictions is to minimize hazards to 
visitors and surrounding residences, and to minimize the possibility of 
wildfire. The public lands within the designated area will remain open 
to other resource and recreation uses unless otherwise restricted.
    Penalties: As prescribed under the Federal Land Policy and 
Management, 43 USC Section 1733 (a). Violation is punishable by fines 
and/or imprisonment under 43 CFR 8360.0-7.

EFFECTIVE DATE:  These management restrictions will go into effect upon 
publication in the Federal Register and will remain in effect until 
rescinded or modified by the authorized officer.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Steve Hartmann, Acting Field Manager, 
P.O. Box 3388, Butte, Montana 59702, 406-494-5059.

    Dated: January 12, 2000.
Steve Hartmann.
Acting Field Manager.
[FR Doc. 00-1674 Filed 1-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DN-P
69–008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 106–102

WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE

REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 800, THE EDUCATION

FLEXIBILITY PARTNERSHIP ACT OF 1999

APRIL 20, 1999.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Ms. PRYCE of Ohio, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 143]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 143, by a record vote of 11 to 0, report the same to the

House with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of the Conference

Report to Accompany H.R. 800, the Education Flexibility Partnership Act of 1999. The rule waives points of order against the conference report and against its consideration. The rule further provides that the conference report shall be considered as read.

The waiver of all points of order includes a waiver of clause 8 of

rule XXII (requiring a three-day layover of a conference report) because the conference report was not filed until Tuesday, April 20,

but will be considered on the floor on Wednesday, April 21. Also,

the waiver of all points of order includes a waiver of clause 9 of

rule XXII (prohibiting matters not specifically committed to the

conference from being included in the conference report). The conference committee adopted an amendment by Senator Jeffords to

exempt rural school districts from the Department of Education’s

consortia program. This amendment was not within the scope of

the conference, but it was adopted by the conference by voice vote.

COMMITTEE VOTES

Pursuant to clause 3(b) of House Rule XIII the results of each

record vote on an amendment or motion to report, together with

the names of those voting for and against, are printed below:
2

Rules Committee record vote No. 16

Date: April 20, 1999.

Measure: Conference Report to Accompany H.R. 800, the Education Flexibility Partnership Act of 1999.

Motion by: Mr. Goss.

Summary of motion: To report the rule.

Results: Adopted 11 to 0.

Vote by Members: Goss—Yea; Linder—Yea; Pryce—Yea; DiazBalart—Yea; Hastings—Yea; Myrick—Yea; Sessions—Yea; Reynolds—Yea; Hall—Yea; Slaughter—Yea; Dreier—Yea.

Æ
No. 11-8725.

#### Bell *v.*Arkansas.

Sup. Ct. Ark. Certiorari denied.
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2014-0145

 Directorate Identifier: 2013NM183AD

7X-182, R3 --- 2/26/13

7X-182, R2 --- 6/1/12

7X-182, R1 --- 12/7/11

7X-182 --- 12/17/10

SAFRAN 870-32-021, R1 --- 12/21/12

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02

- 19

- 00281

- CR

___________________________

On Appeal from the 297th District Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1446248W

Before Sudderth, C.J.; Gabriel and Kerr, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### C ORAN 

### C ORDAY 

### M ELTON



### , Appellant

V



### .

T HE 

### S TATE OF 

### T EXAS2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

Appellant has moved to dismiss his appeal. Because we have not yet decided

this case, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a),

43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Do Not Publish

Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered: October 3, 2019
§ 101.509 Interference protection criteria. ( a ) As a condition for use of frequencies in this service each licensee is required to: ( 1 ) Engineer the system to be reasonably compatible with adjacent and co-channel operations in the same or adjacent areas on all frequencies; and
( 2 ) Cooperate fully and in good faith to resolve whatever potential interference and transmission security problems may be present in adjacent and co-channel operations.
( b ) All harmful interference to other users of co-channel and adjacent channel use in the same or adjacent geographical area are prohibited. In areas where Economic Areas are in close proximity, careful consideration should be given to minimum power requirements and to the location, height, and radiation pattern of the transmitting and receiving antennas. Licensees are expected to cooperate fully in attempting to resolve problems of potential interference before bringing the matter to the attention of the Commission.
( c ) Licensee shall coordinate their facilities whenever the facilities have optical line-of-sight into other licensees' areas or are within the same geographic area. Licensees are encouraged to develop operational agreements with relevant licensees in the same or adjacent areas. Incumbent SMSA licensee(s) shall retain exclusive rights to its channel(s) within its SMSA and must be protected.
( d ) Licensees shall comply with the appropriate coordination agreements between the United States and Canada and the United States and Mexico concerning cross-border sharing and use of the 24 GHz bands which may require using channels pairs in accordance with the table in § 101.147(r)(9).
( e ) The Commission recommends that coordination is not necessary if the power flux density (pfd) at the boundary of the relevant adjacent area is lower than −114 dBW/m2 in any 1 MHz. This value can be changed and agreed upon by both coordinating parties. Licensees should be able to deploy with a pfd up to −94 dBW/m2 in any 1 MHz at the boundary of the relevant adjacent area without negatively affecting the successful operations of the adjacent area licensee.
[65 FR 59360, Oct. 5, 2000]
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Frank P. Reilly, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Fittipaldi Logistics, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of Fittipaldi Logistics, Inc.

                                     FITTIPALDI LOGISTICS, INC.

                                     /s/ Frank P. Reilly
                                     -------------------
                                     Frank P. Reilly
                                     Chief Executive Officer and
                                     Principal Financial and Accounting Officer

November 14, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
791 A.2d 213

#### IN THE MATTER OF JAY G. HELT AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

March 5, 2002.

ORDER

JAY G. HELT of HOLMDEL and MONMOUTH BEACH, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1983, having tendered his consent to disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JAY G. HELT is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by JAY G. HELT pursuant to *Rule*1:21-6 shall be restrained from disbursement except on application to this Court for good cause shown and shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court, who is directed to deposit the funds in the Superior Court Trust Fund pending further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys; and it is further

*30ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
#### § 303-70.302 When an immediate family member, residing with the employee, dies while the employee is stationed OCONUS, may we pay interment expenses?

No. You may not pay interment expenses when an immediate family member, residing with the employee, dies while the employee is stationed OCONUS.
383P15

#### State v. Lesiba Simon Matsoake

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-304)

Denied
H H

î

î"

"

H

î"

H

H

H

H

H H

H

H

H

H

H î î

î

î

î

î î

î

î î

î "

" "

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

?

?

1⁄2

1⁄4

1⁄2

1⁄4

?

"F

2800

3600

3200

3200

2800

3200

3200

2800

2800

3000

2800 3200

3600

3200

3200

3000

3600

3600

2400

2400

3200

3200

3600

3600

2600

2600

2600

2600

2600

2600

3400

3400

3400

3400

3000

3000

3000

3000

3000

2800

2800

2800

2800

2800

¬«94

S H O C K E Y T R U C K T R L

C U S T E R R D

M O O R E R D

S H A N N O N R D

S H E R ID A N R D

F O R E S T G AT E R D

D O D D L N

T IE R R A D E L S O L R D

F A R

V A L L E Y

R D

CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

ESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS

SAN DIEGO CO

SAN DIEGO CO

Campo Cr

Campo

Cr

Campo

Lake

Hacienda del

Florasol

Campo

Rancho Del Campo

Campo

Valley

Castle Rock Ranch

Curro Ranch

Potrero

Morena

Reservoir

Cameron

Corners

Live Oak

Springs

Campo Tierra

del Sol

3597

35

99

03

08

3602

00

36

36

06

05

35

07

36

36

36

01

98

36

36

36

04

35

3609000mN

00

98

99

36

3601

35

36

02

36

07

3606

36

04

36

03

36

3605

N

36

08

09

000m 97

5

35

48 550 552 553 554 555 556 557 000mE

5

58

48

5

549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557

1770000

32'30" 32'30"

35'

FEET

25'

25'

27'30"

35'

NS

32°

116°

30" 32°

22'

NR

116°

NS

22'

116°

116°

37'

NR

37'

30'

30'

30"

30"

30"

32°

32°30' 30'

000m

000 FEET

000 FEET

1 000

520

6

FEET

27'

547 E

800

490

6

30"

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

CALIFORNIA

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

CAMPO, CA-BCN

2012

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

WX Interstate Route /. US Route H State Route

CAMPO QUADRANGLE

CALIFORNIA-BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

This map was produced to conform with the

National Geospatial Program US Topo Product Standard, 2011.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.6.1

CONTOUR INTERVAL 40 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0

MILES

1

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

Imagery......................................................NAIP, May 2010

Roads................................................©2006-2011 TomTom

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2011

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2010

Contours.............................National Elevation Dataset, 2006

Boundaries..............Census, IBWC, IBC, USGS, 1972 - 2010

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 11S

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: California Coordinate System of 1983

(zone 6)

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

NS

NR

36 00

11S

×

Ù

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2012 MAGNETIC NORTH

DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 18 ́

5 MILS

11° 52 ́

211 MILS
131P01-12

#### State v. Anthony Dove

1. Defs Pro *Se*Petition for *Writ of Mandamus*

1. Dismissed

2. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion to Expedite Petition for *Writ of Mandamus*

2. Dismissed as moot

Ervin, J.,

recused
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Visiting the Court - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"1Ja9db3Lsf\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/information-for\/visiting-the-court\/\">Visiting the Court<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/information-for\/visiting-the-court\/embed\/#?secret=1Ja9db3Lsf\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Visiting the Court” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"1Ja9db3Lsf\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"The National Courts Building is located on Madison Place between Pennsylvania Avenue and H Street, N.W., on the east side of Lafayette Square (the President’s Park), across from the White House, in downtown Washington, D.C. The Treasury Department, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and St. John’s Church and Parish House are nearby.\u00a0 The Dolley Madison […]"}
No. 11-9600.

#### Landry *v.*Cain, Warden, et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 3.45 Amount of charges.

Accounting Authorities may charge any reasonable fee for their settlement services. Settlements themselves, however, must adhere to the standards set forth in these rules and must be in accordance with the International Telecommunication Regulations (ITR) taking into account the applicable ITU-T Recommendations and other guidance issued by the Commission.
#### § 302.12 Program termination.

Except with respect to the report required under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, Division N, Title IX, section 902(c)(7), and the authority of the Secretary of Commerce and the Inspector General of the Department of Commerce described in section 902(c)(8), the CMC Pilot Program, including all reporting requirements under section 902, shall terminate on the date on which the amounts made available to carry out the CMC Pilot Program are fully expended.
§ 5.69 License grants that differ from applications. If the Commission grants a license or special temporary authority with parameters that differ from those set forth in the application, an applicant may reject the grant by filing, within 30 days from the effective date of the grant, a written description of its objections. Upon receipt of such objection, the Commission will coordinate with the applicant in an attempt to resolve issues arising from the grant. ( a ) Applicants may continue operating under the parameters of a granted special temporary authority (STA) during the time any problems are being resolved when: ( 1 ) An application for a conventional license has been timely filed in accordance with § 5.61; and
( 2 ) The application for conventional license is for the same facilities and technical limitations as the existing STA.
( b ) The applicant, at its option, may accept a grant-in-part of their license while working to resolve any issues.
§ 30.6 Permissible communications. ( a ) A licensee in the frequency bands specified in § 30.4 may provide any services for which its frequency bands are allocated, as set forth in the non-Federal Government column of the Table of Frequency Allocations in § 2.106 of this chapter (column 5).
( b ) Fixed-Satellite Service shall be provided in a manner consistent with part 25 of this chapter. The technical and operating rules in this part shall not apply to Fixed-Satellite Service operation.
[81 FR 79937, Nov. 14, 2016, as amended at 83 FR 65, Jan. 2, 2018]
#### §§ 17.14-17.17 [Reserved]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 128 (Monday, July 3, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 41012]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16776]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA-1413, MM Docket No. 99-252; RM-9648]


Digital Television Broadcast Service; Las Vegas, NV

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of Journal Broadcast 
Corporation, licensee of Station KTNV, Las Vegas, Nevada, substitutes 
DTV Channel 12 for DTV Channel 17 at Las Vegas, Nevada. See 64 FR 
38621, July 19, 1999. DTV Channel 12 can be allotted to Las Vegas at 
coordinates (35-56-43 N. and 115-02-32 W) with a power of 26.4, HAAT of 
610 meters and with a DTV service population of 738 thousand.
    With this action, this proceeding is terminated.

DATES: Effective August 14, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-1600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 99-252, adopted June 26, 2000, and 
released June 29, 2000. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC. The 
complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Services, 
Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Television, Digital television broadcasting.

    Part 73 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334. 336.


Sec. 73.622  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.622(b), the Table of Digital Television Allotments 
under Nevada, is amended by removing DTV Channel 17 and adding DTV 
Channel 12 at Las Vegas.

Federal Communications Commission.
Barbara A. Kreisman,
Chief, Video Services Division, Mass Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 00-16776 Filed 6-30-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P