alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Lt Col Perry Alexander

### Deputy Department Chair and Instructor

### 

### 

**Areas of Interest:**

Engineering and project management

Lieutenant Colonel Alexander received his commission through the Air Force Officer Training School at Maxwell AFB, Alabama.  He is a career acquisition officer who served as a Systems Engineer and Program Manager in various positions at the squadron and wing levels. He is a fully Joint Qualified Officer (JQO) whose experience includes MILSATCOM, document/media exploitation, operational intelligence, and missile defense at the National Agency and Major Command levels. Lieutenant Colonel Alexander also served as Commander, Defense Logistics Agency Support Team in support of Operation ENDURING FREEDOM at Bagram Airfield, Afghanistan.

 

Lieutenant Colonel Alexander graduated from Tuskegee University with a Bachelor of Science degree in Electrical Engineering and has a Master of Business Administration degree from Wright State University. He also has Level III certification in Engineering and Level II certification in Program Management with the Acquisition Professional Development Program (APDP), part of the Defense Acquisition Workforce Improvement Act (DAWIA).  His major awards and decorations include the Defense Meritorious Service Medal, Air Force Commendation Medal, Joint Service Achievement Medal, and Global War of Terror Service Medal.
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Derek Nguyen, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Datalogic
International Inc;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuers's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

                                 /s/ Derek Nguyen
Date: May 6, 2004                __________________________________________
                                 Chief Executive Officer
#### State of Florida ex rel. R. W. Farnell, *Petitioner,*vs. Guy-Gillen, County Judge, et al., as and constituting the Columbia County Canvassing Board; Mrs. J. C. Joyner, et al., *Respondents.*

143 So. 659.

Division A.

Opinion filed September 27, 1932.

*A. K. Blaoh,*for Petitioner;

*J. E. Gillen*and *J. B. Ho'dges,*for Respondents.

Per Curiam.

Alternative writ of mandamus was issued herein on the 12th day of August, 1932. One of the Respondents, Guy Gillen, has filed plea in abatement with motion to dismiss this cause for the reason that a like cause was at the time of the institution of this suit pending in .the Circuit Court of the Third Judicial Circuit of Florida. He attaches to his plea and motion a certified copy of the transcript of record of that other cause in *779■which is shown by the certificate of a Judge of the Third Judicial Circuit of Florida and by the certificate of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the Third Judicial Circuit of Florida in and for Columbia County that such other suit was pending when petition was1 filed in this court and was pending on the 18th day of August, 1932. Motion to strike plea in abatement.

The record shows, therefore, that the Circuit Court of the Third Judicial Circuit of Florida in and for Columbia County had acquired jurisdiction of the subject-matter and of the parties prior to the institution of the proceedings in this Court and that it retained jurisdiction thereof at the time proceedings were instituted in this Court.

It is, therefore, ordered that the plea in abatement be sustained and that the cause be hence dismissed. It is so ordered.

Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.

Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
###### Editorial Note on Part 36

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 74 FR 23956, May 22, 2009, 77 FR 30411, May 23, 2012, 82 FR 25538, June 2, 2017, and corrected at 83 FR 4153, Jan. 30, 2018. Nomenclature changes to part 36 also appear at 83 FR 63587, Dec. 11, 2018, and 84 FR 4360, Feb. 15, 2019.

#### § 36.507 Other jurisdictional liabilities and deferred credits—Net—Account 4370.

(a) Amounts in this account are separated based upon an analysis of the specific items involved.
4/12/2016 

U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Docket Operations 

West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC 20590 

Submitted Electronically via the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

Courtright Aerial Services, LLC, (hereinafter referred to as "CAS") has prepared the following addendum 

to Exemption # 15135 under Docket FAA-2015-6312 

This addendum adds any aircraft identified on the List of Approved Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) 

under Section 333 at regulatory docket FAA-2007-3330 at www.regulations.gov, (which is updated 

regularly) when weighing less than 55 pounds including payload. 

Allowing the use of any aircraft on the List of Approved Unmanned Systems (UAS) has been used 

recently in exemptions: 

• Exemption No. 15821 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-6626 

The exemption listed above is similar in nature to CAS's exemption and therefore no new precedent 

would be set by extending the same List to CAS. 

This addendum makes no other changes to the currently approved exemption 15135, reasons for 

exemption request, and/or operating parameters. 

Sincerely, ! 

N JtrcA .\) 

Nick Courtright 

Courtright Aerial Services, LLC 

5809 Kean Rd. 

Westerville, Ohio 43082 

Phone: 614-467-0558 

Email: N.Courtright@gmail.com
No. 11-5180.

#### McHugh *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with this Quarterly Report of HIV-VAC Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the year period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin Murray,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the
         period ending December 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material
         respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HIV-VAC
         Inc.

Dated: September 30, 2011

/s/ Kevin Murray
Kevin Murray
Chief Financial Officer
No. 11-9987.

#### Ndubuisi *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-1205.

#### Bush et ux. *v.*Slagh et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
February 23, 2015

Mr. Robert Stenevik

Vice President of Safety, Maintenance and Operations

109 San Medina Lane

Joshua, TX 76058

Dear Mr. Stenevik:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request on behalf of the 

Commemorative Air Force for an exemption from §§ 91.9(a), 91.315, 91.319(a), 119.5(g) and 

119.21(a), of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not

process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your exemption request into the public docket on January 20, 2015 (No. FAA2015-0115), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent 

does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). 

For us to consider the request any further, you must send us the following information 

indicated below:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

 If applicable, the specific reasons why you need to exercise the privileges of your 

exemption outside the United States. 
2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days of the date of this letter. We will consider the docket on your 

request open during this period. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition 

for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

You may submit the additional information to the FAA through the Internet at 

http://www.regulations.gov, the Federal Docket Management System Web site using the 

public docket number assigned to your petition. Paper submission should be sent to this 

address: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, West Building Ground Floor, 

Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. Also, for additional 

instructions, you may visit http://www.faa.gov/regulations

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within the 30 day period, we will close the docket without 

notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may e-mail 

the analyst working your petition, Mr. Alphonso Pendergrass @

alphonso.pendergrass@faa.gov, or call (202) 267-4713. 

Sincerely,

/s/

James M. Crotty

Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division

Enclosure

§ 11.81
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 160 (Friday, August 18, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 47780]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7045]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, September 8, 2006.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Eileen A. Donovan,
Acting Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 06-7045 Filed 8-16-06; 11:50 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
MATERIALS NOT INCLUDED IN

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (AD) DOCKET

FAA-2013-0737

Docket Number

2012-SW-111-AD

Directorate Identifier

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

Eurocopter Emergency Alert Service Bulletin Nos. 67.00.45 or 67.19, both 

Revision 1, and both dated December 5, 2012.

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel,

Southwest Region

Rules Docket

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663

Fort Worth, Texas 76137

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays.
Form of Term Sheet for 2007 Incentive Compensation Plan - Corporate Executive



 Exhibit 10.2 
 MANTECH INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION 
 Executive Term Sheet 
 For 2007 Incentive Compensation Plan 
 [Date] 
 [Name]: 
 The
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”) has determined that you are eligible to participate in the Company’s 2007 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”). Your participation shall be
subject to the terms and conditions of this Term Sheet and the Plan. A copy of the Plan is attached to this Term Sheet. All capitalized terms in this Term Sheet have the meanings ascribed to them in the Plan. 
 Target Award. The Committee has established a Target Award for you of [xx]% of your base salary. The Target Award is the amount of
incentive compensation that you will earn if 100% of your Participant Goals are achieved. 
 Calculation of Incentive Compensation. A
calculation worksheet is attached to this Term Sheet as Exhibit A. Also included on the calculation worksheet are your Participant Goals and weighting factors, as approved by the Committee. The amount of incentive compensation you earn, if
any, will be determined by converting the Company Performance Score to an Award Percentage using the conversion table included on Exhibit A. The Award Percentage will then be multiplied by your base salary to yield the incentive compensation
payment earned hereunder. 
  

	 	•	 	 If the Company Performance Score does not meet or exceed 90%, then no incentive compensation will be paid hereunder. 


  

	 	•	 	 The maximum total incentive compensation that you can earn hereunder is an amount equal to [xx]% of your Target Award. 


  

	 	•	 	 Any incentive compensation payments earned will be paid in accordance with the provisions of the Plan and the Company’s practices, in a lump sum cash payment
after the financial results for 2007 have been finally determined. 


 Unless the Committee, in its discretion, determines
otherwise, your rights to receive the incentive compensation earned hereunder will be forfeited if you are not still an employee of the Company on December 31, 2007. Consistent with the terms of the Plan, the Committee may adjust the incentive
compensation earned hereunder in its discretion if it deems an extraordinary reason exists (in its sole discretion). Notwithstanding anything else herein, no incentive compensation earned hereunder shall be paid until formally approved by the
Committee. The Company will withhold an appropriate amount from such incentive compensation for the payment of all applicable withholding taxes. 
  

					
	ManTech International Corporation	 	
			
	By:	 	  
	 	
	Title:	 	  
	 	


 Term Sheet for Corporate Executive
No. 11-1196.

#### Hershey *v.*New York.

App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 4th Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.
# Ricardo Aguilera of iCollege's CFO Academy to be Nominated by President Obama

/ Published Sept. 23, 2015

Professor Ricardo Aguilera

The National Defense University wishes to extend a warm congratulations to NDU Information Resources Management College (iCollege) Professor Ricardo Aguilera, who will soon be nominated by President Obama for the post of Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Financial Management, Department of Defense.  Ricardo is a Professor of Practice within the iCollege's Chief Financial Officer (CFO) Academy, a position he has held since 2010.  Mr. Aguilera previously served in the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) as Special Assistant to the Deputy Comptroller for Program and Budget from 2008 to 2010, and as Associate Director of Contingencies and International Affairs from 2006 to 2008.  From 1998 to 2006, Mr. Aguilera served as Deputy Branch Chief at the Office of Management and Budget, and from 1991 to 1998, he served as a Senior Evaluator at the Government Accountability Office.  Mr. Aguilera received a B.A. from New York University and an M.A. from George Washington University.  Ricardo's iCollege colleagues are very proud of his accomplishments, and everyone at NDU looks forward to following his continued successful government career.  Read the White House press release here: https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/09/18/president-obama-announces-more-key-administration-posts
Ricardo's iCollege bio can be found at: http://icollege.ndu.edu/About/FacultyStaff/ArticleView/tabid/8876/Article/571318/ricardo-aguilera.aspx
§ 304-6.3 What happens if an employee accepts payment from a non-Federal source that is in violation of this part? If an employee accepts payment from a non-Federal source in violation of this part— ( a ) You may require the employee, in addition to any penalty provided by law and applicable regulations, to pay the general fund of the Treasury, an amount equal to the payment so accepted; and
( b ) The employee shall not be entitled to any reimbursement from the Government for such expenses.
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350 ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period June 30, 2012 (the "Report"), Mark Yung, Executive Chairman of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  DATE: AUGUST 28th, 2012 BY: /S/ MARK YUNGMARK YUNGEXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc. and will be retained by Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
SCWC

- 1 7

- 0000 695

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I

EDELMIRA SALAYES ARAIZA , Petitioner/P etitioner

- Appellant,

vs.

STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I , Respondent/ Respondent

- Appellee

.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP

- 1 7

- 0000 695 ; C R

. NO. 1 4

- 1

- 0162; S.P.P. NO. 15

- 1

- 0007 )

ORDER ACCEPT ING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, J J. , and Circuit J udge Browning , in place of Pollack, J., recused )

Petitioner/P etitioner

- Appellant ’ s Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on June 2 4 , 2020, is hereby accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument. The parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling

. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ʻ i, July 29, 2020

. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ R

. Mark Browning Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-17-0000695 29-JUL-2020 02:50 PM
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.30001 Definitions. For purposes of this subpart: ( a ) *Wavelength at the AM frequency.* In this subpart, critical distances from an AM station are described in terms of the AM wavelength. The AM wavelength, expressed in meters, is computed as follows: (300 meters)/(AM frequency in megahertz) = AM wavelength in meters. For example, at the AM frequency of 1000 kHz, or 1 MHz, the wavelength is (300/1 MHz) = 300 meters.
( b ) *Electrical degrees at the AM frequency.* This term describes the height of a proposed tower as a function of the frequency of a nearby AM station. To compute tower height in electrical degrees, first determine the AM wavelength in meters as described in paragraph (a) of this section. Tower height in electrical degrees is computed as follows: (Tower height in meters)/(AM wavelength in meters) × 360 degrees = Tower height in electrical degrees. For example, if the AM frequency is 1000 kHz, then the wavelength is 300 meters, per paragraph (a) of this section. A nearby tower 75 meters tall is therefore [75/300] × 360 = 90 electrical degrees tall at the AM frequency.
( c ) *Proponent.* The term proponent refers in this section to the party proposing tower construction or significant modification of an existing tower or proposing installation of an antenna on an AM tower.
( d ) *Distance from the AM station.* The distance shall be calculated from the tower coordinates in the case of a nondirectional AM station, or from the array center coordinates given in CDBS or any successor database for a directional AM station.
§ 302.5 Approval and award. ( a ) NTIA will review each application for compliance with the requirements of this part.
( b ) NTIA may request additional information from the applicant, with respect to any of the application submission requirements of § 302.4, prior to making a recommendation for an award. Failure to submit such additional information may preclude the applicant from further consideration for award.
( c ) When making grant awards, NTIA will coordinate with other Federal agencies, including the Commission, the National Science Foundation, and the Department of Education, to ensure the efficient expenditure of Federal funds, including by preventing multiple expenditures of Federal funds for the same purpose.
( d ) The Assistant Secretary will recommend to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Grants Management Division, approval of grant awards to qualifying applicants. NIST, serving as the Grants Office for the CMC grant program, will then issue grant awards in writing to the successful applicants.