alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
794 A.2d 176

#### IN THE MATTER OF HAMDI M. RIFAI, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

April *15, 2002.*

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court pursuant to *R.*1:20—10(b), following a motion for discipline by consent of HAMDI M. RIFAI of NEWARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1994;

And the District VA Ethics Committee and respondent having signed a stipulation of discipline by consent in which it was agreed that respondent violated *RPC*1.1(a) (neglect), *RPC*1.3 (lack of diligence), *RPC*1.4(a) (failure to communicate), *RPC*1.15(b) (failure to turn over client file on termination of representation)and *RPC*1.16(d) (failure to protect client interest on termination of representation);

And the parties having agreed that respondent’s conduct violated *RPC*1.1(a) (neglect), *RPC*1.3 (lack of diligence), *RPC*1.4(a) (failure to communicate), *RPC*1.15(b) (failure to turn over client file on termination of representation) and *RPC*1.16(d) (failure to protect client interest on termination of representation) and that said conduct warrants a reprimand;

*436And the Disciplinary Review Board having determined that a reprimand is the appropriate discipline for respondent’s ethics violations and having granted the motion for discipline by consent;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having submitted the record of the proceedings to the Clerk of the Supreme Court for the entry of an order of discipline in accordance with *R.*1:20—16(e);

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that HAMDI M. RIFAI of NEWARK is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to 10 U.S.C.  Section  1350 as adopted  pursuant to Section 1350 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  in  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of
Electronic Game Card, Inc. on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending  September 30,
2005, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report") for Electronic Game Card, Inc., (the "Company"),  the undersigned
hereby certifies that:

(1)      to the  best of my  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with  the
         requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

(2)      to the best of my knowledge,  the  information  contained in the Report
         fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and
         result of operations of the Company.

May 5, 2006


/S/ LINDEN J. BOYNE
---------------------------
    LINDEN J. BOYNE
    CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
No. 11-5453.

#### Collins *v.*Connecticut.

Sup. Ct. Conn. Cer-tiorari denied.
§ 32.2121 Buildings. ( a ) This account shall include the original cost of buildings, and the cost of all permanent fixtures, machinery, appurtenances and appliances installed as a part thereof. It shall include costs incident to the construction or purchase of a building and to securing possession and title.
( b ) When land, together with the buildings thereon, is acquired, the original cost shall be fairly apportioned between the land and buildings, and the amount applicable to the buildings shall be included in this account. The amount applicable to the land shall be included in Account 2111, Land.
( c ) This account shall not include the cost of any telephone equipment or wiring apparatus for generating or controlling electricity for operating the telephone system.
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS

 

I, Serge Doyon , certify that:

1. I have reviewed the quarterly report of Vectoria Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. As the Registrant's sole certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant I have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which the quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any changes in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors:

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: September 24, 2003				By:	/s/ Serge Doyon				*Name:	Richard St-Julien on behalf of Serge Doyon

	Title:	President and acting CFO

		*
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4421 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4421

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that tax-exempt 
 interest shall not be taken into account in determining the amount of 
           social security benefits included in gross income.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 1994

 Mr. Solomon (for himself, Mr. Stump, Mr. Bunning, Mr. Levy, Mr. Kyl, 
   and Mr. Sensenbrenner), introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that tax-exempt 
 interest shall not be taken into account in determining the amount of 
           social security benefits included in gross income.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TAX-EXEMPT INTEREST NOT TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN DETERMINING 
              TAXATION OF SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 86(b) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to social security and tier 1 railroad 
retirement benefits) is amended by striking ``gross income--'' and all 
that follows and inserting ``gross income determined without regard to 
this section and sections 135, 911, 931, and 933.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.1      Consent of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP




To the Board of Directors
North Central Bancshares, Inc.
Fort Dodge, Iowa



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the North Central Bancshares,
Inc. Registration Statement on Form S- 8 of North Central Bancshares, Inc.,
pertaining to the North Central Bancshares, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan, of our
report dated February 7, 2002, which appears in the annual report on Form 10-K
of North Central Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December
31, 2002.





                                                  /s/  McGladrey & Pullen, LLP
                                                  ----------------------------
                                                  McGladrey & Pullen, LLP





Des Moines, Iowa
February 7, 2002
§ 59.2 Terms and conditions of infrastructure sharing. ( a ) An incumbent local exchange carrier subject to the requirements of section 59.1 shall not be required to take any action that is economically unreasonable or that is contrary to the public interest.
( b ) An incumbent local exchange carrier subject to the requirements of section 59.1 may, but shall not be required to, enter into joint ownership or operation of public switched network infrastructure, technology, information and telecommunications facilities and functions and services with a qualifying carrier as a method of fulfilling its obligations under section 59.1.
( c ) An incumbent local exchange carrier subject to the requirements of section 59.1 shall not be treated by the Commission or any State as a common carrier for hire or as offering common carrier services with respect to any public switched network infrastructure, technology, information, or telecommunications facilities, or functions made available to a qualifying carrier in accordance with regulations issued pursuant to this section.
( d ) An incumbent local exchange carrier subject to the requirements of section 59.1 shall make such public switched network infrastructure, technology, information, and telecommunications facilities, or functions available to a qualifying carrier on just and reasonable terms and pursuant to conditions that permit such qualifying carrier to fully benefit from the economies of scale and scope of such local exchange carrier. An incumbent local exchange carrier that has entered into an infrastructure sharing agreement pursuant to section 59.1 must give notice to the qualifying carrier at least sixty days before terminating such infrastructure sharing agreement.
( e ) An incumbent local exchange carrier subject to the requirements of section 59.1 shall not be required to engage in any infrastructure sharing agreement for any services or access which are to be provided or offered to consumers by the qualifying carrier in such local exchange carrier's telephone exchange area.
( f ) An incumbent local exchange carrier subject to the requirements of section 59.1 shall file with the State, or, if the State has made no provision to accept such filings, with the Commission, for public inspection, any tariffs, contracts, or other arrangements showing the rates, terms, and conditions under which such carrier is making available public switched network infrastructure, technology, information and telecommunications facilities and functions pursuant to this part.
No. 11-9597.

#### Mohsen *v.*Morgan Stanley Dean Witter et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 64.6120 Waiver process. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 77366 , Sept. 20, 2024.
( a ) A Provider may seek a waiver of the interim rate caps established in § 64.6030 and the Ancillary Service Charge fee caps on a Correctional Facility or contract basis if the interstate or international rate caps or Ancillary Service Charge fee caps prevent the Provider from recovering the costs of providing interstate or international Inmate Calling Services at a Correctional Facility or at the Correctional Facilities covered by a contract.
( b ) At a minimum, a Provider seeking such a waiver is required to submit: ( 1 ) The Provider's total company costs, including the nonrecurring costs of the assets it uses to provide Inmate Calling Services, and its recurring operating expenses for these services at the Correctional Facility or under the contract;
( 2 ) The methods the provider used to identify its direct costs of providing interstate and international Inmate Calling Services, to allocate its indirect costs between its Inmate Calling Services and other operations, and to assign its direct costs to and allocate its indirect costs among its Inmate Calling Services contracts and Correctional Facilities;
( 3 ) The Provider's demand for interstate and international Inmate Calling Services at the Correctional Facility or at each Correctional Facility covered by the contract;
( 4 ) The revenue or other compensation the Provider receives from the provision interstate and international Inmate Calling Services, including the allowable portion of any permissible Ancillary Service Charges attributable to interstate or international inmate calling services, at the Correctional Facility or at each Correctional Facility covered by the contract;
( 5 ) A complete and unredacted copy of the contract for the Correctional Facility or Correctional Facilities, and any amendments to such contract;
( 6 ) Copies of the initial request for proposals and any amendments thereto, the Provider's bid in response to that request, and responses to any amendments (or a statement that the Provider no longer has access to those documents because they were executed prior to the date this section is codified.
( 7 ) A written explanation of how and why the circumstances associated with that Correctional Facility or contract differ from the circumstances at similar Correctional Facilities the Provider serves, and from other Correctional Facilities covered by the same contract, if applicable; and
( 8 ) An attestation from a company officer with knowledge of the underlying information that all of the information the provider submits in support of its waiver request is complete and correct.
( c ) A Provider seeking a waiver pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section must provide any additional information requested by the Commission during the course of its review.
[87 FR 40732, July 28, 2021, as amended at 87 FR 7956, Feb. 11, 2022]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Byron D. Hewett, Chief Executive Officer of Immunicon Corporation (the Company), hereby certify that:

(1) The Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Byron D. Hewett    
|Byron D. Hewett        
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|May 12, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4647 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 602
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4647

                          [Report No. 103-360]

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 14 (legislative day, July 11), 1994

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

              August 24 (legislative day, August 18), 1994

               Reported by Mr. Baucus, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey to the City of 
Imperial Beach, California, approximately 1 acre of land in the Tijuana 
                    Slough National Wildlife Refuge.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF LAND IN TIJUANA SLOUGH NATIONAL WILDLIFE 
              REFUGE.

    (a) Requirement.--The Secretary of the Interior shall expeditiously 
convey to the City of Imperial Beach, California, without compensation, 
all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to 
approximately 1 acre of land in the Tijuana Slough National Wildlife 
Refuge, as depicted on a United States Fish and Wildlife Service map 
entitled ``T-ball Field, Tijuana Slough National Wildlife Refuge'', 
dated June 1994, for use as a public recreational area.
    (b) Reversionary Interest in the United States.--Upon any date on 
which any of the land in which right, title, and interest is conveyed 
under subsection (a) ceases to be used by the City of Imperial Beach, 
California, for public recreational purposes--
            (1) all such right, title, and interest shall revert to the 
        Government of the United States; and
            (2) such land shall be reincorporated into the Tijuana 
        Slough National Wildlife Refuge.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 12, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 602

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4647

                          [Report No. 103-360]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey to the City of 
Imperial Beach, California, approximately 1 acre of land in the Tijuana 
                    Slough National Wildlife Refuge.

_______________________________________________________________________

              August 24 (legislative day, August 18), 1994

                       Reported without amendment
```
No. 11-9437.

#### Thompson v. Premo, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE 

EPA - HQ - OW -2014-0598 DCN: SGE00 768 .A0 9     THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECA USE IT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION (CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 7119

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. LESLIE DOMINIC MUSGROVE , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Elkins

. John Preston Bailey , District Judge. ( 2:11

- cr - 00016

- JPB

- RWT

- 11; 2:15

- cv - 00036

- JPB

- RWT )

Submitted : January 30, 2018 Decided: February 1, 2018

Before MOTZ and KEENAN , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Leslie Dominic Musgrove, Appellant Pro Se. Shawn Michael Adkins, Paul Thomas Camilletti, Erin K. Reisenweber, Assistant United St ates Attorneys, Martinsburg, West Virginia , Stephen Donald Warner, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Elkins, West Virginia ; Shawn Angus Morgan, STEPTOE & JOHNSON PLLC, Bridgeport, West Virginia , for Appellee.
Unpubli shed opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Leslie Dominic Musgrove seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The or der is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S .C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322,
336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and t hat the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at
484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Musgrove has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of a ppealability , deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional pro cess.

DISMISSED