alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Bernard J. Morello and White Lion Holdings, L.L.C. v. Seaway Crude Pipeline Company, LLC

Appellate case number: 01

- 16

- 00765

- CV

Trial court case number: 13

- CCV

- 050 231

Trial court: County Court at Law No

. 3 of Fort Bend County

Appellants Bernard J. Morello and While Lion Holdings, L.L.C. filed a motion seeking an order that either compels the trial court clerk to transmit to this Court, in camera, the
documents tha t were submitted in camera to the trial court or permits Appellants to submit authenticated copies of the documents directly to this Court in camera

. This Court has responsibilities to the public as an appellate court to resolve disputes through public op inions that explain our decisions based on the record. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.3 (“All opinions of the courts of appeals are open to the public and must be made available . . . . ”);

s ee also R.V.K. v. L.L.K ., 103 S.W.3d 612, 614

– 15 (Tex. App.

– San Antonio 2 003, no pet.) (attempting to “strike a fair balance” between parties ’ interest in keeping sealed portion of record
confidential and court ’ s and public ’ s interest in court fulfilling its responsibilities); Mi Gwang Contact Lens Co., Ltd. v. Chapa , No. 13

– 13

– 00306

– CV, 2015 WL 3637846, at *6

– 7 (Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi June 11, 2015, no pet.) (mem. op.) (same). Appellants’ motion is DENIED

. Within 1 5 days, Appellants shall either request that the clerk include the documents in the appellate record without limi tation or, to the extent they seek to maintain any confidentiality to the documents, file with the trial court a Rule 76a motion to seal court records. Appellants shall notify this Court whether it is pursuing a Rule 76a motion by December 8 , 2016

. If Appe llants pursue a Rule 76a motion and the trial court grants their motion, the trial court clerk shall submit to this Court those documents that are part of the summary

- judgment record below that are sealed separate from those documents that are part of the summary

judgment record below that are not sealed, clearly designating each group.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: Harvey Brown

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: November 23 , 2016
No. 11-5535.

#### Erby *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certio-rari denied.
§ 32.2341 Large private branch exchanges. ( a ) This account shall include the original cost, including the cost of installation, of multiple manual private branch exchanges and of dial system private branch exchanges of types designed to accommodate 100 or more lines or which can normally be expanded to 100 or more lines, installed for customers' use. This account shall also include the original cost of other large installations of station equipment: ( 1 ) Which do not constitute stations,
( 2 ) which require special or individualized treatment because of their complexity, special design, or other distinctive characteristics, and
( 3 ) for which individual or other specialized cost records are appropriate. (Note also Account 2311, Station Apparatus.)
( b ) The cost of intrabuilding network cables including their associated cross-connection boxes, terminals, distributing frames, etc., is chargeable to Account 2426, Intrabuilding Network Cable.
( c ) The cost of outside plant, whether or not on private property, used with intrabuilding, network cable shall be charged to the appropriate outside plant accounts.
( d ) - ( e ) [Reserved]
( f ) Private branch exchanges for company official use shall be included in Account 2123, Office Equipment.
( g ) Embedded CPE is that equipment or inventory which is tariffed or otherwise subject to the jurisdictional separations process as of January 1, 1983. Inventories of large private branch exchanges equipment are included in Account 1220, Inventories.
[51 FR 43499, Dec. 2, 1986, as amended at 52 FR 6562, Mar. 4, 1987; 52 FR 39535, Oct. 22, 1987; 59 FR 46930, Sept. 13, 1994]
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

IVINS ROSIER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-1935

[April 18, 2024]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Daliah H. Weiss,

Judge; L.T. Case No. 502012CF012864A.

Ivins Rosier, Bonifay, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., MAY and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Christopher L. HAMILTON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 03-3804.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

March 17, 2004.

Christopher L. Hamilton, Lompoc, CA, pro se.

Colin S. Bruce, Office of the United States Attorney, Urbana, IL, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before BAUER, EASTERBROOK, and KANNE, Circuit Judges.

The court, on its own motion, VACATES the order of March 15, 2004.
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 23


                          SCB COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY, INC.

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No.333-1590) pertaining to the SCB Computer Technology, Inc. 1995 Stock
Incentive Plan, and in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No.333-36971 and
Form S-8 No.333-68343) pertaining to the SCB Computer Technology, Inc. 1997
Stock Incentive Plan, of our report dated June 30, 2000, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of SCB Computer Technology, Inc. included in
the Annual Report (Form 10-K/A No. 2) for the year ended April 30, 1999.


                                            /s/  Ernst & Young LLP

Memphis, Tennessee
July 18, 2000
Exhibit 32.2





Section 1350


CERTIFICATION








The undersigned officer hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of COMFORCE Corporation for the quarter ended March 28, 2010 as to which this Certification is an exhibit fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and (2) the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of COMFORCE Corporation.








Signed May 6, 2010.








/s/ Harry V. MaccarroneHarry V. MaccarroneExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
098P16

#### Robert Fuhs, Sr. v. Summer Fuhs, Constance C. Moore, and Legal Aid of North Carolina, Inc.

Plt’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-945)

Denied
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4633 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4633

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
    coastwise trade and on the Great Lakes and their tributary and 
      connecting waters in trade with Canada for each of 2 barges.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 22, 1994

   Mr. Roth introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
    coastwise trade and on the Great Lakes and their tributary and 
      connecting waters in trade with Canada for each of 2 barges.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the 
Act of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106 and 12107 
of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may 
issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for 
employment in the coastwise trade and on the Great Lakes and their 
tributary and connecting waters in trade with Canada, for each of 2 
barges owned by Roen Salvage (a company incorporated under the laws of 
the State of Wisconsin and having its principal place of business in 
Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin) and numbered 103 and 203 by Roen Salvage.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Community Bank Corporation of America (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Cheryl R. Bryan, Principal Financial and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the
period covered by the report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                   |  |  |  |     |  |                                     
|----- |  | ----------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: |  | November 15, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Cheryl R. Bryan                 
|      |  |                   |  |  |  |     |  | Cheryl R. Bryan, Principal Financial
|      |  |                   |  |  |  |     |  | and Principal Accounting Officer
§ 54.1612 Validity of electronic signatures. ( a ) For the purposes of this subpart, an electronic signature, defined by the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act, as an electronic sound, symbol, or process, attached to or logically associated with a contract or other record and executed or adopted by a person with the intent to sign the record, has the same legal effect as a written signature.
( b ) For the purposes of this subpart, an electronic record, defined by the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act as a contract or other record created, generated, sent, communicated, received, or stored by electronic means, constitutes a record.
#### § 101.601 Eligibility.

Any person, or any governmental entity or agency, eligible for licensing in a radio service or pool under part 80, 87, or 90 of this chapter or any person proposing to provide communications service to such persons, governmental entities or agencies is eligible to hold a license under this subpart. This subpart shall not apply to stations offering MVDDS in the 12.2-12.7 GHz band.

[62 FR 18936, Apr. 17, 1997, as amended at 67 FR 43040, June 26, 2002]
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 2.1057 Frequency spectrum to be investigated. ( a ) In all of the measurements set forth in §§ 2.1051 and 2.1053, the spectrum shall be investigated from the lowest radio frequency signal generated in the equipment, without going below 9 kHz, up to at least the frequency shown below: ( 1 ) If the equipment operates below 10 GHz: to the tenth harmonic of the highest fundamental frequency or to 40 GHz, whichever is lower.
( 2 ) If the equipment operates at or above 10 GHz and below 30 GHz: to the fifth harmonic of the highest fundamental frequency or to 100 GHz, whichever is lower.
( 3 ) If the equipment operates at or above 30 GHz: to the fifth harmonic of the highest fundamental frequency or to 200 GHz, whichever is lower.
( b ) Particular attention should be paid to harmonics and subharmonics of the carrier frequency as well as to those frequencies removed from the carrier by multiples of the oscillator frequency. Radiation at the frequencies of multiplier stages should also be checked.
( c ) The amplitude of spurious emissions which are attenuated more than 20 dB below the permissible value need not be reported.
( d ) Unless otherwise specified, measurements above 40 GHz shall be performed using a minimum resolution bandwidth of 1 MHz.
[61 FR 14502, Apr. 2, 1996. Redesignated and amended at 63 FR 36599, July 7, 1998]
794 A.2d 178

#### TIBOR L. DEDOBEAU, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

March 20, 2002.

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court on plaintiffs appeal as of right, and the Court having determined that the matter does not raise a substantial constitutional question under *Rule*2:2 — 1(a)(1) and the applicable case law, nor an issue warranting certification under *Rule*2:12-4, it is ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.
No. 11-5524.

#### Williams *v.*Louisiana et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
OMB Control No. 2060 - 0347 

### Attachment to Partnership Letter Organization Information Chief Executive Energy Manager Name & Title: _______________________ Name & Title: _______________________ Mailing Address: _______________________ Mailing Address: _______________________

_______________________ _______________________

_______________________ _______________________ E -mail Address: _______________________ E -mail Address: _______________________ Phone Number: _______________________ Phone Numb er: _______________________ Facsimile: _______________________ Facsimile: _______________________ 

### Communications Contac t Name & Title: _______________________ Mailing Address: _______________________

_______________________

_____________

__________ E -mail Address: _______________________ Phone Number: _______________________ Facsimile: _______________________ Organization’s Prim ary Business or Function (check one) : □ Commercial Real Estate □ Corporate Real Estate □ Multifamily Housing, include :

_____ Number of units ow ned/managed □ K- 12 Education □ Higher Education □ State Government □ Local Government □ Federal Government □ Healthcare & Senior Care Fac ilities □ Hospitality & Entertainment □ Manufacturing/Industrial, include :

_____ NAICS code _____ Number of Manufacturing Plants Operated in the United States _____ Number of Employees in the United States □ Religious (Congregations) □ Retail □ Drinking Water Treatment and Distribution, include :

_____ Total Capacity (mgd) □ Wastewater Treatment, include :

_____ Total Capacity (mgd) □ Other. Describe: _____________________________________ Organization’s t otal building/facility squar e footage (required): Owns _____________________________________ Leases _____________________________________ Manages _____________________________________ How did you learn about E NERGY S TAR ?

_________________________________________________ ____________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________ The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 30 minutes per response. Send comments on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizin g respondent burden, including through the use of automated collection techniques to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (282 2T), 1200 Pennsy lvania Ave., NW , W ashington, D.C. 20460. Include the OMB control nu mber in any correspondence. Do not send the completed form to this address. EPA Form 5900 - 19
§ 25.116 Amendments to applications. ( a ) Unless otherwise specified, any pending application may be amended until designated for hearing, a public notice is issued stating that a substantive disposition of the application is to be considered at a forthcoming Commission meeting, or a final order disposing of the matter is adopted by the Commission.
( b ) Major amendments submitted pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section are subject to the public notice requirements of § 25.151. An amendment will be deemed to be a major amendment under the following circumstances: ( 1 ) If the amendment increases the potential for interference, or changes the proposed frequencies or orbital locations to be used.
( 2 ) If the amendment would convert the proposal into an action that may have a significant environmental effect under § 1.1307 of this chapter.
( 3 ) [Reserved]
( 4 ) If the amendment, or the cumulative effect of the amendment, is determined by the Commission otherwise to be substantial pursuant to section 309 of the Communications Act.
( 5 ) Amendments to “defective” space station applications, within the meaning of § 25.112 will not be considered.
( c ) Any application for an NGSO-like satellite license within the meaning of § 25.157 will be considered to be a newly filed application if it is amended by a major amendment (as defined by paragraph (b) of this section) after a “cut-off” date applicable to the application, except under the following circumstances: ( 1 ) The amendment resolves frequency conflicts with authorized stations or other pending applications but does not create new or increased frequency conflicts;
( 2 ) The amendment reflects only a change in ownership or control found by the Commission to be in the public interest and, for which a requested exemption from a “cut-off” date is granted;
( 3 ) The amendment corrects typographical, transcription, or similar clerical errors which are clearly demonstrated to be mistakes by reference to other parts of the application, and whose discovery does not create new or increased frequency conflicts; or
( 4 ) The amendment does not create new or increased frequency conflicts, and is demonstrably necessitated by events which the applicant could not have reasonably foreseen at the time of filing.
( d ) Any application for a GSO-like satellite license within the meaning of § 25.158 will be considered to be a newly filed application if it is amended by a major amendment (as defined by paragraph (b) of this section), and will cause the application to lose its status relative to later-filed applications in the “queue” as described in § 25.158.
( e ) Any amendment to an application shall be filed electronically through the International Communications Filing System (ICFS) in accordance with the applicable provisions of part 1, subpart Y of this chapter. Amendments to space station applications must be filed on Form 312 and Schedule S. Amendments to earth station applications must be filed on Form 312 and Schedule B.
[56 FR 24016, May 28, 1991, as amended at 68 FR 51503, Aug. 27, 2003; 69 FR 47794, Aug. 6, 2004; 78 FR 8421, Feb. 6, 2013; 88 FR 21440, Apr. 10, 2023]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DIGITAL TRANSMISSION FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED JUNE
30, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                              91
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,016
<ALLOWANCES>                                       733
<INVENTORY>                                      2,469
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,948
<PP&E>                                           3,632
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,746
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,208
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,776
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            42
<OTHER-SE>                                      (3,610)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,208
<SALES>                                         15,579
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,579
<CGS>                                           13,721
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,721
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,385
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   733
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 576
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (8,095)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       285
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (8,380)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (8,380)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (2.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (2.01)
        

</TABLE>
§ 51.803 Procedures for Commission notification of a state commission's failure to act. ( a ) Any party seeking preemption of a state commission's jurisdiction, based on the state commission's failure to act, shall notify the Commission in accordance with following procedures: ( 1 ) Such party shall file with the Secretary of the Commission a petition, supported by an affidavit, that states with specificity the basis for the petition and any information that supports the claim that the state has failed to act, including, but not limited to, the applicable provisions of the Act and the factual circumstances supporting a finding that the state commission has failed to act;
( 2 ) Such party shall ensure that the state commission and the other parties to the proceeding or matter for which preemption is sought are served with the petition required in paragraph (a)(1) of this section on the same date that the petitioning party serves the petition on the Commission; and
( 3 ) Within fifteen days from the date of service of the petition required in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the applicable state commission and parties to the proceeding may file with the Commission a response to the petition.
( b ) The party seeking preemption must prove that the state has failed to act to carry out its responsibilities under section 252 of the Act.
( c ) The Commission, pursuant to section 252(e)(5) of the Act, may take notice upon its own motion that a state commission has failed to act. In such a case, the Commission shall issue a public notice that the Commission has taken notice of a state commission's failure to act. The applicable state commission and the parties to a proceeding or matter in which the Commission has taken notice of the state commission's failure to act may file, within fifteen days of the issuance of the public notice, comments on whether the Commission is required to assume the responsibility of the state commission under section 252 of the Act with respect to the proceeding or matter.
( d ) The Commission shall issue an order determining whether it is required to preempt the state commission's jurisdiction of a proceeding or matter within 90 days after being notified under paragraph (a) of this section or taking notice under paragraph (c) of this section of a state commission's failure to carry out its responsibilities under section 252 of the Act.