alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**






CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Palomar Enterprises Inc., a Nevada
      corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30,
      2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the "Report"), I, Brent Fouch, Treasurer, Principal Accounting Officer and
      Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






Dated:  
      August 11,
      2007 /s/
      Brent Fouch


By: Brent Fouch, Treasurer, Principal Accounting Officer and Director
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. John David MOONEY, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 03-4433.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 22, 2003.

Decided March 22, 2004.

*60W. Michael Frazier, Frazier & Oxley, L.C., Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellant. Kasey Warner, United States Attorney, Miller A. Bushong III, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

John David Mooney pled guilty to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g), 924(a)(2) (2000). On appeal, he alleges that the district court erred by denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. We do not find that the district court abused its discretion in denying Mooney’s motion to withdraw. *United States v. Ubakanma,*215 F.3d 421, 424 (4th Cir.2000). Thus, we affirm. We also deny Mooney’s motion to stay case. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
###### Editorial Note on Part 36

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 74 FR 23956, May 22, 2009, 77 FR 30411, May 23, 2012, 82 FR 25538, June 2, 2017, and corrected at 83 FR 4153, Jan. 30, 2018. Nomenclature changes to part 36 also appear at 83 FR 63587, Dec. 11, 2018, and 84 FR 4360, Feb. 15, 2019.

#### § 36.171 Property held for future telecommunications use—Account 2002; Telecommunications plant under construction—Account 2003; and Telecommunications plant adjustment—Account 2005.

The amounts carried in Accounts 2002, 2003, and 2005 are apportioned among the operations on the basis of the apportionment of Account 2001, Telecommunications Plant in Service.

[60 FR 12138, Mar. 6, 1995]
EXHIBIT 31.2

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joey Schwartz, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Environmental
Solutions Worldwide, Inc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other Certifying Officer's and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing of this quarterly
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) Presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other Certifying Officer's and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other Certifying Officer's and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

                                                DATE: NOVEMBER 9, 2007


                                                /S/ JOEY SCHWARTZ
                                                --------------------
                                                JOEY SCHWARTZ
                                                CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of LipidViro Tech, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report), we, Thomas J. Howells, President and Chief Executive Officer and Shelley Goff, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


|      |                  |  |     |                                                         
|----- | ---------------- |  | --- | --------------------------------------------------------
|Date: | October 28, 2010 |  | By: | /s/Thomas J. Howells                                    
|      |                  |  |     | Thomas J. Howells, President and Chief Executive Officer




|      |                  |  |     |                        
|----- | ---------------- |  | --- | -----------------------
|Date: | October 28, 2010 |  | By: | /s/Shelley Goff        
|      |                  |  |     | Shelley Goff, Treasurer
792 A.2d 1207

#### IN THE MATTER OF KIMBERLY A. HINTZE, A/K/A KIMBERLY HINTZE-WILCE, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

April 3, 2001.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision IN DRB 00-328 and 00-329, concluding that KIMBERLY A. HINTZE, a/k/a KIMBERLY HINTZE-WILCE, of JERSEY CITY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1991, and who thereafter was temporarily suspended from practice by Order of this Court filed January 17, 2001, and who remains suspended at this time, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for violating *RPC*1.1(a) (gross neglect), *RPC*1.1(b) (pattern of neglect), *RPC*1.3 (lack of diligence), *RPC*1.4(a) (failure to communicate) and *RPC*1.15(a) (failure to safekeep property of client), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that KIMBERLY A. HINTZE, a/k/a KIMBERLY HINTZE-WILCE, is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months and until the further Order of the Court, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that on reinstatement respondent shall practice under the supervision of a practicing attorney approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics for a period of two years, and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent continue to be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of suspension and that respondent comply with *Rule*1:20-20; and it is further

*85ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6153

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RICHIE HANSFORD CONNER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson, 

District Judge. (5:07-cr-00045-sgw-mfu-1; 5:10-cv-80217-sgwmfu)

Submitted: August 18, 2011 Decided: August 23, 2011

Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richie Hansford Conner, Appellant Pro Se. Sharon Burnham, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia; Jeb Thomas 

Terrien, Assistant United States Attorney, Harrisonburg, 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Richie Hansford Conner seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 

(West Supp. 2011) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Conner has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.1101 Authority.

Authority to impose and collect these charges is contained in section 8 of the Communications Act, as amended by sections 102 and 103 of title I of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2018 (Pub. L. 115-141, 132 Stat. 1084), 47 U.S.C. 158, which directs the Commission to assess and collect application fees to recover the costs of the Commission to process applications.

[86 FR 15061, Mar. 19, 2021]
171P15-2

#### Arthur Donald Darby, Jr. v. Jamie Christina Campbell, Jason Murphy, Attorney, Matthew Rothbeind, Attorney, and Fairmont Police Department, Hamlet Police Department, Robeson County Court, “John Doe”

1. Pit’s *Pro Se*Motion for *Error Coram Vobis*

1. Dismissed

*2.*Pit’s *Pro Se*Motion for *Error Coram Nobis*

2. Dismissed
190P13-2

#### State v. Michael Ray King

1. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion for PDR (COAP15-570)

1. Dismissed

2. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion in the Alternative for *Coram Noblis/ Certiorari*Petition

2. Dismissed

3. DefsPro *Se*Motion to Proceed/» *Forma Pauperis*

3. Allowed

4. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion to Appoint Counsel

4. Dismissed as moot

Ervin, J.,

recused
#### § 30.401 Permissible service.

Stations authorized under this subpart may deploy stations used solely as fixed point-to-point stations, fixed point-to-multipoint hub stations, or fixed point-to-multipoint user stations, as defined in § 30.2, subject to the technical and operational requirements specified in this subpart.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.108 Reconsideration on Commission's own motion.

The Commission may, on its own motion, reconsider any action made or taken by it within 30 days from the date of public notice of such action, as that date is defined in § 1.4(b). When acting on its own motion under this section, the Commission may take any action it could take in acting on a petition for reconsideration, as set forth in § 1.106(k).

[76 FR 24392, May 2, 2011]
EXHIBIT 32.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 10 U. S. C. SECTION 1350
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB of Environmental
Solutions Worldwide, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period September 30,
2007 (the "Report"), David J. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer, and President of
the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                    DATE: NOVEMBER 9, 2007


                                    /S/ DAVID J. JOHNSON
                                    --------------------
                                    DAVID J. JOHNSON
                                    CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRESIDENT


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Environmental Solutions Worldwide,
Inc. and will be retained by Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4672 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4672

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
    coastwise trade and on the Great Lakes and their tributary and 
      connecting waters in trade with Canada for each of 3 barges.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 28, 1994

Mr. Carr of Michigan introduced the following bill; which was referred 
           to the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
    coastwise trade and on the Great Lakes and their tributary and 
      connecting waters in trade with Canada for each of 3 barges.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the 
Act of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and sections 12106 and 12107 
of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may 
issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for 
employment in the coastwise trade and on the Great Lakes and their 
tributary and connecting waters in trade with Canada for each of the 
following 3 vessels:
            (1) SPUD BARGE 102 (United States official number 
        D1021958).
            (2) SPUD BARGE 968 (United States official number 
        D1021959).
            (3) SPUD BARGE 103 (United States official number 
        D1021960).

                                 <all>
```
#### § 51-10.102 Application.

This part applies to all programs or activities conducted by the agency.
EXHIBIT 99.1

         Techlabs to Change Corporate Name to Siren International Corp.
            Board Approves New Name to Be Presented to Shareholders

KNOXVILLE, Tenn., July 28 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- TechLabs, Inc. (OTC Bulletin
Board: TELA) announced today that as part of the adoption of a new business plan
and growth strategy, its Board of Directors has approved changing the corporate
name to Siren International Corp. The company will provide supplemental
information regarding the name change closer to the effective date of the name
change, including the new ticker symbol and CUSIP number. Until the name change
is effective, TechLabs' common stock will continue to trade under the current
symbol.

The Board of Directors noted that the new business plan it has adopted is
focused on seeking opportunities in the burgeoning spa industry, particularly in
both the day spa and destination spa market segments. The company will also be
exploring opportunities in the micro-resort segment of the hospitality industry,
most notably in South America, the Caribbean and Florida. The Board also
believes that in certain instances there may be opportunities to link the spa
and micro-resort businesses, providing travelers with professionally
administered spa services, plus fitness, wellness and nutritional components in
an all-inclusive vacation setting, replete with deluxe private accommodations.

About TechLabs

TechLabs is a developer of emerging businesses. While the Company may continue
to operate certain of its current business units, its primary focus will be
centered on exploring opportunities in the leisure, health and nutritional spa
business and the micro-resort segment of the hospitality industry.

This press release contains forward-looking statements, some of which may relate
to TechLabs, Inc., and which involve numerous risks and uncertainties. Actual
results, performance or achievements could differ materially from those
anticipated in such forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors,
including those set forth in TechLabs, Inc.'s filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

# AGENCY:

Department of Offices, Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the date and time for the next meeting and the provisional agenda for consideration by the Committee.

# DATES:

The next meeting of the Treasury Advisory Committee on Commercial Operations of the U.S. Customs Service will be held on Friday, July 21, 2000 at 9 a.m. at 740 15th Street, NW., Suite 700, Washington, DC. The duration of the meeting will be approximately three hours.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

John P. Simpson, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of Regulatory, Tariff and Trade, Office of the Under Secretary (Enforcement), Room 4308, Department of the Treasury, 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20220 (ATTN: COAC)—Tel.: (202) 622-0230. Final meeting details, including the meeting time, location, and agency, can be confirmed by contacting the above number one week prior to the meeting date.

# AGENDA:

At the July 21, 2000 session, a special meeting of the Advisory Committee, the Committee is expected to pursue the following agenda. The agenda may be modified prior to the meeting.

1. Report on Customs Budget for Fiscal Years 2001 and 2002

2. Report from Subcommittee on Merchandise Processing Fee

3. Discussion of the Full Implementation of Mod Act of 1993

4. Brief Update from the Office of Regulations & Rulings Subcommittee

5. Interface Discussion

6. Discussion of the 24/7 U.S. Customs Service at Land Borders

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public; however, participation in the Committee's deliberations is limited to Committee members and Customs and Treasury Department staff. A person other than an Advisory Committee member who wishes to attend the meeting should give advance notice by contacting Theresa Manning at (202) 622-0220 or Helen Belt at (202) 622-0230, no later than July 13, 2000.

Dated: June 28, 2000.

John P. Simpson,

Deputy Assistant Secretary (Regulatory, Tariff and Trade Enforcement).

[FR Doc. 00-16968  Filed 7-5-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-25-M
###### Editorial Note on Part 36

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 74 FR 23956, May 22, 2009, 77 FR 30411, May 23, 2012, 82 FR 25538, June 2, 2017, and corrected at 83 FR 4153, Jan. 30, 2018. Nomenclature changes to part 36 also appear at 83 FR 63587, Dec. 11, 2018, and 84 FR 4360, Feb. 15, 2019.

#### § 36.201 Section arrangement.

This subpart is arranged in sections as follows:

| General | 36.202 |
| --- | --- |
| Operating Revenues | 36.211 |
| Basic local services revenue—Account 5000 | 36.212 |
| Network Access Revenues—Accounts 5081 thru 5083 | 36.213 |
| Long Distance Message Revenue—Account 5100 | 36.214 |
| Miscellaneous Revenue—Account 5200 | 36.215 |
| Uncollectible Revenue—Account 5300 | 36.216 |
| Certain Income Accounts: | |
| Other Operating Income and Expenses—Account 7100 | 36.221 |
| Nonoperating Income and Expenses—Account 7300 | 36.222 |
| Interest and Related Items—Account 7500 | 36.223 |
| Extraordinary Items—Account 7600 | 36.224 |
| Income Effect of Jurisdictional Ratemaking Differences—Account 7910 | 36.225 |

[69 FR 12550, Mar. 17, 2004, as amended at 83 FR 63585, Dec. 11, 2018]