alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"2020-1540: Baggage Airline Guest Services v. Roadie, Inc. - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"b3rSvPjPWq\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/11-02-2020-2020-1540-baggage-airline-guest-services-v-roadie-inc-audio-uploaded\/\">2020-1540: Baggage Airline Guest Services v. Roadie, Inc.<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/11-02-2020-2020-1540-baggage-airline-guest-services-v-roadie-inc-audio-uploaded\/embed\/#?secret=b3rSvPjPWq\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“2020-1540: Baggage Airline Guest Services v. Roadie, Inc.” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"b3rSvPjPWq\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Oral argument audio posted: Baggage Airline Guest Services v. Roadie, Inc. (mp3) Appeal Number: 2020-1540 To listen to more oral argument recordings, follow this link: Listen To Oral Arguments."}
**Exhibit 32(b)**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

OF ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB 

OF PINNACLE DATA SYSTEMS, INC. 

FOR THE YEARENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003 

 

The undersigned is the Chief Financial Officer ofPinnacle Data Systems, Inc. (the “Issuer”). This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Issuer for the annual period endedDecember 31, 2003. 

 

I, Michael R. Sayre, certify that the Annual Report on Form10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer. 

 

This certification is executed as of March 24, 2004.
§ 25.283 End-of-life disposal. ( a ) *Geostationary orbit space stations.* Unless otherwise explicitly specified in an authorization, a space station authorized to operate in the geostationary satellite orbit under this part shall be relocated, at the end of its useful life, barring catastrophic failure of satellite components, to an orbit with a perigee with an altitude of no less than: 36,021 km + (1000·CR·A/m) where CR is the solar radiation pressure coefficient of the spacecraft, and A/m is the Area to mass ratio, in square meters per kilogram, of the spacecraft.
( b ) *Geostationary orbit space station end of life operations.* A space station authorized to operate in the geostationary satellite orbit under this part may operate using its authorized tracking, telemetry and control frequencies, and outside of its assigned orbital location, for the purpose of removing the satellite from the geostationary satellite orbit at the end of its useful life, provided that the conditions of paragraph (a) of this section are met, and on the condition that the space station's tracking, telemetry and control transmissions are planned so as to avoid electrical interference to other space stations, and coordinated with any potentially affected satellite networks.
( c ) *All space stations.* Upon completion of any relocation authorized by paragraph (b) of this section, or any relocation at end-of-life specified in an authorization, or upon a spacecraft otherwise completing its authorized mission, a space station licensee shall ensure, unless prevented by technical failures beyond its control, that stored energy sources on board the satellite are discharged, by venting excess propellant, discharging batteries, relieving pressure vessels, or other appropriate measures.
( d ) *Applicability of minimum perigee for geostationary orbit space stations.* The minimum perigee requirement of paragraph (a) of this section shall not apply to space stations launched prior to March 18, 2002.
( e ) *Low-Earth orbit space stations.* For space stations ending their mission in or passing through the low-Earth orbit region below 2000 km altitude and planning disposal through uncontrolled atmospheric re-entry, disposal must be completed as soon as practicable following end of mission, and no later than five years after the end of the mission. For purposes of this paragraph (e), *end of mission* is defined as the time at which the individual spacecraft is no longer capable of conducting collision avoidance maneuvers. For spacecraft without collision avoidance capabilities, *end of mission* is defined as the point in which the individual spacecraft has completed its primary mission.
[69 FR 54588, Sept. 9, 2004, as amended at 78 FR 8431, Feb. 6, 2013; 81 FR 55349, Aug. 18, 2016; 89 FR 65223, Aug. 9, 2024]
No. 10-11111.

#### Herrera *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# Vacant 

### Associate Dean of Joint Warfighting

### 

###
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA

- 23

- 0012

ALMA EDWARDS

,

Plaintiff /Appellant

,

- vs

TURLEY DENTAL CARE, PC

,

Defendant /Appellee

. GRANT OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLEE ’S ANSWER BRIEF

Appellee has filed an Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time up to and

including May 8, 2023 , within which to file Appellee ’ s Answer Brief. Appellee ’ s

counsel has represented to the Court that Appellant’ s counsel has been contacted and

does not object to this Motion.

The motion for extension of time through and including May 8, 2023 , within

which to file the Appellee ’ s Answer Brief, is hereby GRANTED.

DATED this

____ day of March , 202 3

.

_____________________________

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court March 21 2023

03/21/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0012
#### § 301.130 Technical assistance to Dispute Resolution Boards.

Upon request of a Dispute Resolution Board convened pursuant to subpart C of this part, the Technical Panel shall provide the board with such technical assistance as requested.
§ 27.1607 Information sharing for time division duplex synchronization. ( a ) 3.45 GHz Service licensees must provide information to requesting Citizens Broadband Radio Service (part 96 of this chapter) operators to enable time division duplex (TDD) synchronization. Negotiations over the information must be conducted in good faith, with the goal of enabling synchronization between the relevant systems. ( 1 ) A Citizens Broadband Radio Service operator, whether a Priority Access Licensee or a General Authorized Access user (§ 96.1(b) of this chapter), may request information from a 3.45 GHz Service licensee to enable cross-service TDD synchronization if it provides service, or intends to provide service, in the same or adjacent geographic area as a 3.45 GHz Service licensee.
( 2 ) Upon request by an eligible Citizens Broadband Radio Service operator, the 3.45 GHz Service licensee must provide sufficient technical information to allow the Citizens Broadband Radio Service operator to synchronize its system with the 3.45 GHz band system. The 3.45 GHz Service licensee must keep this information current if its network operations change.
( b ) 3.45 GHz Service licensees are under no obligation to make any changes to their operations or proposed operations to enable TDD synchronization.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 5, 2021

No. 04-21-00173-CR

Uzziel N. Munoz CRUZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 5, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 549370

Honorable John Longoria, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was originally due September 22, 2021; however, the court granted an 

extension of time until October 22, 2021. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time has 

not been filed. 

We therefore order appointed appellate counsel, Staci Krause, to file the appellant’s brief 

by November 15, 2021.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of November, 2021.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
#### § 17.51 [Reserved]
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            College of Information and Cyberspace
                    National Defense University
                CIC
        Search
                    Search CIC:
                        Search
                Search CIC:
                    Search
    Home

    About 
        Mission & Vision

    Faculty & Staff

    Fact Sheet

    Alumni

    Internships

    FAQ

    Admissions 
        Eligibility Requirements

    Admissions Calendar

    Application Instructions

    Apply Online

    International Students

    Academics 
        Graduate Catalog

    M.S. in Strategic Information and Cyberspace Studies
        
        JPME Master's Degree

    Cyber Workforce Master's Degree (Part Time)

    Leadership Development Programs

    Graduate Certificates

    Academic Partners

    Current Students 
        JPME II  Incoming Students

    LDP Incoming Students

    Student Registration

    Bring Your Own Device

    IA Compliance

    Completion Procedures / Order Transcripts

    Student Services and Resources

    Events
    
        Cyber Beacon

    Cyber PME Colloquium

    Hopper Award

    Lecture Series

    CYBERCOM Symposium

    NEWS

    UC2
    
        About

    Events

    Work With Us

    Center for Cybersecurity
    
        About

    Cybersecurity Center POC

    Cybersecurity Supporting Faculty

    CAE-CDE CISO Certificate Program

    Cybersecurity Trending News

    Cyber Labs
        
        Ethical Hacking

    Critical Infrastructure - SCADA

    Cyber Exercises
        
        Tabletop Exercise

    Cyber Competitions

    Cyber Resources and Awareness

    Stakeholder / Industry Advisory Council

    Contact 
        Contact Us

    Directions

    Access to Ft. McNair

    Map of Ft. McNair  Home
  NEWS
  News & Announcements
 News & Announcements Download
 Details
 Share
 News
 Colonel Eberhardt Retirement Ceremony
 Congratulation to Colonel Eberhardt on his retirement from the Air Force! The CIC family thanks you for your service to the College and wishes you the best of luck on your next adventures!
 SHARE
 PRINT
 National Defense University


College of Information and Cyberspace

300 Fifth Ave., Bldg. 62
Fort Lesley J. McNair
Washington, DC 20319-5066

202-685-6300
                    Stay Connected
                
                
                DOD Privacy & Security
 DOD Links Disclaimer
 DOD Social Media Policy
 DOD Web Policy
 FOIA
 NDU System of Records Notice
 NDU Privacy & Security Notice
 No FEAR Act
 Open GOV
 Plain Writing Act
 Section 508
 Small Business Act
 USA.gov
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
# Faculty Spotlight! Mr. Harry Wingo, J.D 

/ Published April 21, 2022
25 April, 2022, 
Professor Wingo leads the Chief Information Officer (CIO) Leadership Development Program (LDP) at the National Defense University (NDU) College of Information and Cyberspace (CIC). He has over 25 years of government and corporate leadership experience, including 15 years focused on information and communications technology law and policy. Read more about his military and leadership experience click here!
412P15

#### Gregory Allen Taylor v. Harnett County District Court Jacqualyn L. Lee

Def’s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Mandamus*

Denied
§ 25.172 Requirements for reporting space station control arrangements. ( a ) The operator of any space station licensed by the Commission or granted U.S. market access must file the following information with the Commission prior to commencing operation with the space station, or, in the case of a non-U.S.-licensed space station, prior to commencing operation with U.S. earth stations. ( 1 ) The information required by § 25.171(a).
( 2 ) The call signs of any telemetry, tracking, and command earth station(s) communicating with the space station from any site in the United States.
( 3 ) The location, by city and country, of any telemetry, tracking, and command earth station that communicates with the space station from any point outside the United States.
( 4 ) Alternatively, instead of listing the call signs and/or locations of earth stations currently used for telemetry, tracking, and command, the space station operator may provide 24/7 contact information for a satellite control center and a list of the call signs of any U.S. earth stations, and the locations of any non-U.S. earth stations, that are used or may be used for telemetry, tracking, and command communication with the space station(s) in question.
( b ) The information required by paragraph (a) of this section must be filed electronically in the Commission's International Communications Filing System (ICFS), in the “Other Filings” tab of the space station's current authorization file. If call sign or location information provided pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section becomes invalid due to a change of circumstances, the space station operator must file updated information in the same manner within 30 days, except with respect to changes less than 30 days in duration, for which no update is necessary.
[79 FR 8321, Feb. 12, 2014, as amended at 86 FR 11888, Mar. 1, 2021; 88 FR 21441, Apr. 10, 2023]
H. R. 4551

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four

An Act

To designate the United States Post Office building located at 301 West Lexington

Street in Independence, Missouri, as the ‘‘William J. Randall Post Office’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The United States Post Office building located at 301 West

Lexington Street in Independence, Missouri, shall be known and

designated as the ‘‘William J. Randall Post Office’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the building referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the William

J. Randall Post Office.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
§ 4.18 Mandatory Disaster Information Reporting System (DIRS) reporting for Cable Communications, Wireless, Wireline, and VoIP providers. ( a ) Cable Communications, Wireline, Wireless, and Interconnected VoIP providers shall be required to report their infrastructure status information each day in the Disaster Information Reporting System (DIRS) when the Commission activates DIRS in geographic areas in which they provide service, even when their reportable infrastructure has not changed compared to the prior day. Cable Communications, Wireless, Wireline and Interconnected VoIP providers are subject to mandated reporting in DIRS and shall: ( 1 ) Provide daily reports on their infrastructure status from the start of DIRS activation until DIRS has been deactivated.
( 2 ) Provide a single, final report to the Commission within 24 hours of the Commission's deactivation of DIRS and the termination of required daily reporting, detailing the state of their infrastructure at the time of DIRS deactivation and an estimated date of resolution of any remaining outages.
( b ) Cable Communications, Wireline, Wireless, and Interconnected VoIP providers who provide a DIRS report pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section are not required to make submissions in the Network Outage Reporting System (NORS) under this chapter pertaining to any incidents arising during the DIRS activation and that are timely reported in DIRS. Subject providers shall be notified that DIRS is activated and deactivated pursuant to Public Notice from the Commission and/or the Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau.
( c ) This section may contain information collection and/or recordkeeping requirements. Compliance with this section will not be required until this paragraph (c) is removed or contains compliance dates.
[89 FR 25542, Apr. 11, 2024]
Submitted on briefs Jan. 13,

decided Feb. 8, 1910.

#### ROCKWOOD *v.*GROUT.

[106 Pac. 789.]

Appeal and Error—Appealable Orders.

Under Section 547, B. & C. Comp., authorizing an appeal from a final order affecting a substantial right and in effect determining the action, so as to prevent a judgment therein, an order sustaining a demurrer to an amended complaint was not appealable, since it did not settle the controversy, as, under Section 101, the court could have permitted a further amendment, or allowed plaintiff to file a new primary pleading.

From Coos: James W. Hamilton, Judge.

This is an action by E. M. Rockwood against J. W. Grout and others. From an order sustaining a demurrer to an amended complaint, plaintiff appeals.

Dismissed.

For appellant there was a brief with oral arguments by *Messrs. Guerry & Hollister.*

For respondent there was a brief with oral arguments by *Mr. C. E. Maybee*and *Mr. N. C. McLeod.*

*390This is an attempted appeal from an order of the circuit court for Coos County, sustaining a demurrer to an amended complaint. An appeal may be taken from a final order affecting a substantial right and which in effect determines .the action or suit, so as to prevent a judgment or decree therein. Section 547, B. & C. Comp. The order herein is not final, since it does not settle the legal controversy. The trial court, after sustaining the demurrer, retained jurisdiction of the suit, and at its discretion could have permitted the amended complaint further to be amended, or it could have allowed the plaintiff to file a new primary pleading. Section 101, B. & C. Comp.

No decree had been rendered dismissing the suit, and until that was done the trial court retained power further to hear and determine the cause. *Giant Powder Co.*v. *Oregon Western Ry. Co.,*54 Or. 325. (101 Pac. 209).

It follows that the appeal must be dismissed, and it is so ordered. Dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-356-000]

Take notice that on June 26, 2000, El Paso Natural Gas Company (El Paso) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1-A, the following tariff sheets:

### Effective March 26, 2000

Third Revised Sheet No. 289

Second Revised Sheet No. 336

Fifth Revised Sheet No. 338

1st Revised Third Revised Sheet No. 339

First Revised Sheet No. 342

Second Revised Sheet No. 346

Fifth Revised Sheet No. 350

Third Revised Sheet No. 350A

### Effective June 1, 2000

Second Revised Sheet No. 308

El Paso states that the tariff sheets are being submitted, pursuant to Order No. 637, to (i) remove the rate ceiling for capacity releases of less than one year, (ii) modify El Paso's right-of-first-refusal provisions applicable to long term firm contracts at the maximum rate, and (iii) revise the electronic bulletin board description to refer to El Paso's Internet Web site.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-17004  Filed 7-5-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M