alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FONECASH, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         121,020
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     68,524
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               214,544
<PP&E>                                          81,889
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 314,243
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           82,651
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           530
<OTHER-SE>                                     231,062
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   384,350
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  785,982
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (785,366)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (785,366)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (785,366)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.20)


</TABLE>
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

APRIL 24, 2009

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 08-11353

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 07-00059-CR-3-MCR

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ERIC DALE ROBINSON,

a.k.a. ERIC JR,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

_________________________

(April 24, 2009)

Before CARNES, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Eric Dale Robinson in this appeal, has
moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a

brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d

493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s

assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent

examination of the record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to

withdraw is GRANTED, and Robinson’s conviction and sentence are

AFFIRMED.

2
EXHIBIT 31.1

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Richard Hersh, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Power2Ship, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) for the issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectives of the issuer's disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the Quarterly
Report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the issuer's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the issuer's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal control over
financial reporting.



                                     /s/ Richard  Hersh
                                    -------------------------
                                    President,  Chief
Executive Officer


October 15, 2003
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ralph Rubio, Chief Executive Officer of Rubio's Restaurants, Inc. (the
"Company"), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

         (a) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
ended March 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: May 13, 2003

/s/  Ralph Rubio
-----------------------------
Ralph Rubio
Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Rubio's Restaurants, Inc. and will be retained by Rubio's
Restaurants, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
###### Editorial Note on Subpart A of Part 60-1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subpart A appear at 85 FR 71570, Nov. 10, 2020.

#### § 60-1.1 Purpose and application.

The purpose of the regulations in this part is to achieve the aims of parts II, III, and IV of Executive Order 11246 for the promotion and insuring of equal opportunity for all persons, without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin, employed or seeking employment with Government contractors or with contractors performing under federally assisted construction contracts. The regulations in this part apply to all contracting agencies of the Government and to contractors and subcontractors who perform under Government contracts, to the extent set forth in this part. The regulations in this part also apply to all agencies of the Government administering programs involving Federal financial assistance which may include a construction contract, and to all contractors and subcontractors performing under construction contracts which are related to any such programs. The procedures set forth in the regulations in this part govern all disputes relative to a contractor's compliance with his obligations under the equal opportunity clause regardless of whether or not his contract contains a “Disputes” clause. Failure of a contractor or applicant to comply with any provision of the regulations in this part shall be grounds for the imposition of any or all of the sanctions authorized by the order. The regulations in this part do not apply to any action taken to effect compliance with respect to employment practices subject to title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The rights and remedies of the Government hereunder are not exclusive and do not affect rights and remedies provided elsewhere by law, regulation, or contract; neither do the regulations limit the exercise by the Secretary or Government agencies of powers not herein specifically set forth, but granted to them by the order.

[79 FR 72993, Dec. 9, 2014]
P.1 

OAR Box 1875 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

17) ll-E-35 

Docket Number: 

A-90-19 

Printed 12/1/200811:12:44 AM Sheet 17 of 86 
P.2 

A-90-19 

•;^|J/U V !' ';• ""E"

35 

JAC A Corp. , DEC l 8 1992 

550 Pinetown Rd. 

\ ';_,......-- -~:'7\. Ft. Washington, PA 19034 

Project Name: HON 

Person Contacted/Title 

Phone Number: 

Company 

Representing: 

JACA Representative: 

Discussion: I 

The 

{ t < '••'• -' " - -TL. 

Telephone 

1-201-575-7475 

Penta Manufacturing Cn. 

Christopher Holmes 

called Penta to obtain price 

following prices were given: 

MINIMUM PURCHASE 

1 lb. 

5 lbs. 

10 lbs. 

25 lbs. 

44 lbs. 

(Log 

Date: 

Time: 

Project No.: 

Fax: 1-201-

quotes for di 

PRICE 

$21.50/1b. 

17.50/1b. 

14.50/1b. 

9.50/ lb. 

7.55/1b. 

Jtg-jtg u i OA . cN/gng"tf/ 4 

February 26, 1992 

014308 

575-8907 

phenyl methane.
May 28, 2015 

Mr. Maxwell Lewin 

Vertical Three LLC 

102 Oconee Pass 

Woodstock, GA 30188 

Dear Mr. Lewin: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your April 23, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket 

(No. FAA-2015-1180), but we are unable to process your request any further. The 

information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For 

us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
**Exhibit 32.01**

**SECTION1350 CERTIFICATION**

In connection with thisannual report of ML JWH Strategic Allocation Fund  L.P. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for thefiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Benjamin C. Weston, ChiefExecutive Officer and President of Merrill Lynch AlternativeInvestments LLC, the general partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant  to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

1. This Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The informationcontained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date:                                 | March 29, 2007         |   |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|--------|
|                                  |
| By                                    | /s/ BENJAMIN C. WESTON |   |
| Benjamin C. Weston                    |
| Chief Executive Officer and President |
|                                       |                        |        |  |  |

 

----
June 7, 2013

Mr. Thomas H. Miller

Gama Charters, Inc.

700 Great Meadow Road

Sikorsky Memorial Airport

Stratford, CT 06497

Dear Mr. Miller :

This is in response to your March 11 , 2013 letter (public docket No. FAA

- 20 11

- 0 330 )

petitioning the Federal Aviation Admi nistration on behalf of Gama Charters, Inc. (Gama

Charters) for an exemption from § 1 35 .225 ( f ) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations

(CFR) . That exemption, if granted, would allow Gama Charters to make instrument flight

rules (IFR) takeoffs from foreig n and military airports when the visibility is less than 1 statute

mile or make an instrument approach when the visibility is less than 1⁄2 mile

.

On January 11, 2012, the FAA amended 14 CFR § 135.225(f) relating to takeoff, approach

, and landing minimums (7 7 FR 1629). A copy of this rule change is enclosed for your

information.

Because the relief you seek is now covered under the current rule, we will take no further

action on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/

Ida M. Klepper

Manager, Airmen and

Airspace Ru les Division

Enclosure
From: <michael.schon@bakerbotts.com>

To: Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 11/08/2010 04:22 PM Subject: Petition for Reconsideration and Stay of the Portland Cement NESHAP and NSPS Rules

Dear Mr. Barnett,
Attached please find one copy of the Petition for Reconsideration and Stay of the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry and Standards of Performance for Portland Cement Plants, 75 Fed. Reg. 54,970 (Sept. 9, 2010) that were su bmitted to Administrator Jackson on behalf of Eagle Materials Inc. A paper copy is being sent to you via Fed Ex as well.

thanks,

Michael Schon BAKER BOTTS L.L.P. The Warner 1299 Pennsy lvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20004 Direct: 202.639.770 7 Mobile: 202.436.4811 Fax: 202.585.4066 michael.schon@bakerbotts.com <<Petition for Recon and Stay (2).pdf>>
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

HENRY LAMAR DAVIS, JR.,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D15-4138

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed June 3, 2016

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Putnam County,

Patti A. Christensen, Judge.

Henry Lamar Davis, Jr., Daytona 

Beach, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Marjorie VincentTripp, Assistant Attorney General, 

Daytona Beach, for Appellant. 

PER CURIAM.

Henry Lamar Davis, Jr., appeals the summary denial of his Rule 3.850 motion for 

postconviction relief. Davis filed an initial Rule 3.850 motion in June of 2014. That motion

was denied on November 18, 2014, and Davis did not appeal the denial. Six months later, 

Davis filed another Rule 3.850 motion, which was also denied.

1

 1 Davis’s initial brief is really no more than yet another Rule 3.850 motion alleging 

the same forty-one grounds for relief. Twenty-four of these claims untimely challenged 

the trial court's 2009 and 2011 judgments. 
2

The trial court denied the motion in part as impermissibly successive, correctly 

noting that Davis neither labeled the motion as successive nor justified the failure to raise 

the asserted grounds in his prior motion. The trial court failed, however, to attach a copy 

of the prior motions and orders in support of its ruling as required by Florida Rule of 

Criminal Procedure 3.850(h)(2). The State concedes this was error. We reverse and 

remand for attachment of the prior Rule 3.850 motion and the resulting order as it relates 

to Davis’s allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel in his violation-of-probation 

cases. We affirm as to the claims related to the original proceedings and alleging trial 

court error. 

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED.

SAWAYA, COHEN and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
#### § 60-50.5 Nondiscrimination.

The provisions of this part are not intended and shall not be used to discriminate against any qualified employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or national origin.

[79 FR 72995, Dec. 9, 2014]
EX-10.1






March 12, 2007



Mr. Michael Towe


Chief Financial Officer


101 World Drive


Peachtree City, Georgia 30269



Re: Increased Relocation Allowance



Dear Mike:



In light of the unanticipated financial burden your former residence, 6732 The Masters Avenue,
Bradenton, FL 34202 (“the Premises”) has caused you and your family, I am pleased to inform you
that the company hereby agrees to enhance our original commitment to reimburse you for your
reasonable relocation expenses, as provided in your offer letter dated April 5, 2006, as follows:




for the movement of household goods and other related costs incurred in your move from
Florida to the Peachtree City, Georgia area; for temporary living expenses related to your
move to Georgia; for brokerage fees and miscellaneous closing costs incurred upon the sale
of the Premises; for carrying costs incurred on the Premises following your move to Georgia
(to include, by way of example, insurance, taxes, utilities, costs for general maintenance
services such as lawn and pool); and for any loss you incur on the sale of the Premises
(i.e., any difference between your selling price and your purchase price of the Premises).



This total obligation, as stated above, is limited to a maximum relocation allowance of $200,000 of
which the company has already reimbursed you $22,303, leaving a balance of $177,697 in remaining
allowable relocation expenses.



Yours sincerely,



/s/ Randy J. Martinez


Chief Executive Officer
§ 61.20 Method of filing publications. ( a ) All issuing carriers that file tariffs shall file all tariff publications and associated documents, such as transmittal letters, requests for special permission, and supporting information, electronically in accordance with the requirements set forth in §§ 61.13 through 61.17.
( b ) In addition, all tariff publications requiring fees as set forth in part 1, subpart G of this chapter, shall be submitted electronically if practicable in accordance with § 1.1105 of this chapter along with the electronic submission of the payment online form. Petitions which must be filed in hard copy format should be submitted according to the procedures set forth on the web page of the FCC's Office of the Secretary, *https://www.fcc.gov/secretary .*
[76 FR 43211, July 20, 2011, as amended at 83 FR 2557, Jan, 18. 2018]
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Community Bank Corporation of America (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Stan B. McClelland, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |     |  |                                            
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------
|Date: November 13, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Stan B. McClelland                     
|                        |  |     |  | Stan B. McClelland, Chief Financial Officer
No. 11-5637.

#### Dockery *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Electronic Game Card, Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John Bentley,
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                               /s/ John R Bentley
                               -------------------------------------
                                   John R Bentley
                                   President and Chief Executive Officer
                                   (Principal Executive Officer)


September 15, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.