alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4647 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4647

                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
 the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  four


                                 An Act

  
 
  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey to the City of 
Imperial Beach, California, approximately 1 acre of land in the Tijuana 
Slough National Wildlife Refuge.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF LAND IN TIJUANA SLOUGH NATIONAL WILDLIFE 
REFUGE.
    (a) Requirement.--The Secretary of the Interior shall expeditiously 
convey to the City of Imperial Beach, California, without compensation, 
all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to 
approximately 1 acre of land in the Tijuana Slough National Wildlife 
Refuge, as depicted on a United States Fish and Wildlife Service map 
entitled ``T-ball Field, Tijuana Slough National Wildlife Refuge'', 
dated June 1994, for use as a public recreational area.
    (b) Reversionary Interest in the United States.--Upon any date on 
which any of the land in which right, title, and interest is conveyed 
under subsection (a) ceases to be used by the City of Imperial Beach, 
California, for public recreational purposes--
        (1) all such right, title, and interest shall revert to the 
    Government of the United States; and
        (2) such land shall be reincorporated into the Tijuana Slough 
    National Wildlife Refuge.







                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.







                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.`
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4635 Received in Senate (RDS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4635

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 28 (legislative day, June 7), 1994

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
            To extend the Export Administration Act of 1979.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 20 of the 
Export Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 2419) is amended by 
striking ``June 30, 1994'' and inserting ``August 20, 1994''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 27, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Michael CURTIS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-6111.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 11, 2004.

Decided March 19, 2004.

Michael Curtis, Appellant pro se. Michael Lee Keller, Office of the United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Michael Curtis appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge’s report denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2000) motion. In his motion, Curtis asserted he was entitled to modification of his sentence pursuant to Amendment 591 of the *U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual*(2003). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See United States v. Curtis,*Nos. CR-89-54; CA-03-2107-3 (S.D.W.Va. Dec. 4, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 16 (Wednesday, January 25, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 4042-4043]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-681]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Parts 31 and 32

[TD 9233]
RIN 1545-BC89


Sickness or Accident Disability Payments; Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Correction to final regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects final regulations (TD 9233) that were 
published in the Federal Register on December 15, 2005 (70 FR 74198). 
The final regulations provide guidance regarding the treatment of 
payments made on account of sickness or accident disability under a 
workers' compensation law for purposes of the Federal Insurance 
Contributions Act (FICA).

DATES: This correction is effective December 15, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Ford (202) 622-6040 (not a toll-
free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The final regulations (TD 9233) that are the subject of this 
correction are under section 3121 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Need for Correction

    As published, the final regulation (TD 9233) contain errors that 
may prove to be misleading and are in need of clarification.

Correction of the Publication

    Accordingly, the publication of the final regulations (TD 9233), 
which were the subject of FR Doc. 05-23945, is corrected as follows:
    1. On page 74198, column 2, in the preamble under the paragraph 
heading ``Background'', lines 5 and 6, the language ``for Federal 
Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) purposes payments made on `` is 
corrected to read ``for FICA purposes payment made on''.
    2. On page 74199, column 1, in the preamble under the paragraph 
heading ``Explanation of Provisions'', first paragraph of the column, 
line 3, the language ``extent necessary. The Service

[[Page 4043]]

has'' is corrected to read ``extent necessary. The IRS has''.

Cynthia E. Grigsby,
Acting Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing 
Division, Associate Chief Counsel, (Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. 06-681 Filed 1-24-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### § 54.1010 Record retention for Mobility Fund Phase I.

A winning bidder authorized to receive Mobility Fund Phase I support and its agents are required to retain any documentation prepared for, or in connection with, the award of Mobility Fund Phase I support for a period of not less than ten (10) years after the date on which the winning bidder receives its final disbursement of Mobility Fund Phase I support.
#### § 3.40 Operational requirements.

All accounting authorities must conduct their operations in conformance with the provisions contained in this section and with relevant rules and guidance issued from time to time by the Commission.
#### Carlin *v.*Pennsylvania Power and Light Company, Appellant, et al.

Argued November 21, 1949.

Before Maxey, C. J., Drew, Linn, Stern, Patterson, Stearne and Jones, JJ.

*546
      *Ralph M. Barley,*with him *Paul A. Mueller,*for appellant.

*F. Lyman Windolph,*with him *Windolph & John-stone,*for appellee.

January 3, 1950:

Opinion

pee Cueiam,

The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the learned court below.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4629 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4629

   To amend the Truth in Lending Act to impose a civil penalty on a 
   creditor under an open end consumer credit plan that engages in a 
       pattern of unlawfully billing any obligor under the plan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 22, 1994

  Mr. Kildee introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
            Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Truth in Lending Act to impose a civil penalty on a 
   creditor under an open end consumer credit plan that engages in a 
       pattern of unlawfully billing any obligor under the plan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CIVIL PENALTY FOR PATTERN OF UNLAWFUL BILLING UNDER OPEN END 
              CONSUMER CREDIT PLAN.

    Section 163 of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1666b) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) A creditor under an open end consumer credit plan that 
engages in a pattern of unlawfully billing any obligor under the plan 
shall be subject to a civil penalty of not more than $100,000, which 
may be assessed by the Board.''.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



In connection with Bancshares of Florida, Inc.s (Company)
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 (Report), I certify that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for the period ended,
June 30, 2003.
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:  August 13, 2003



|/S/    THOMAS M. WHELAN                 
|----------------------------------------
|Thomas M. Whelan Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report of Palomar Enterprises, Inc., a
Nevada  corporation  (the  "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March
31,  2005,  as  filed  with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof  (the "Report"), I, Steve Bonenberger, President, Chief Executive Officer
and  Director  of  the  Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  June  23,  2005.

                                   /s/ Steve Bonenberger
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Steve Bonenberger, President, Chief Executive
                                   Officer and Director


<PAGE>
#### § 25.255 Procedures for resolving harmful interference related to operation of ancillary terrestrial components operating in the 1.5/1.6 GHz and 1.6/2.4 GHz bands.

If harmful interference is caused to other services by ancillary MSS ATC operations, either from ATC base stations or mobile terminals, the MSS ATC operator must resolve any such interference. If the MSS ATC operator claims to have resolved the interference and other operators claim that interference has not been resolved, then the parties to the dispute may petition the Commission for a resolution of their claims.

[68 FR 33653, June 5, 2003, as amended at 78 FR 8267, Feb. 5, 2013]
```

[House Report 106-54]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

106th Congress                                                   Report
  1st Session           HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES                 106-54

=======================================================================

 
     PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 820, THE COAST GUARD 
                       AUTHORIZATION ACT OF 1999

                                _______
                                

   March 16, 1999.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______

     Mr. Goss, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 113]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 113, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

               BRIEF SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION

    The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 820, 
the ``Coast Guard Authorization Act of 1999,'' under an open 
rule. The rule provides one hour of general debate divided 
equally between the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. The rule makes 
in order the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
amendment in the nature of a substitute as an original bill for 
the purpose of amendment, which shall be open for amendment at 
any point.
    Members who have preprinted their amendments in the 
Congressional Record prior to their consideration will be given 
priority in recognition to offer their amendments if otherwise 
consistent with House rules. The rule allows for the Chairman 
of the Committee of the Whole to postpone votes during 
consideration of the bill, and to reduce voting time to five 
minutes on a postponed question if the vote follows a fifteen 
minute vote. Finally, the rule provides for one motion to 
recommit, with or without instructions.

                                

```
No. 11-5536.

#### Cardenas-Porras *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 32.4340 Net noncurrent deferred operating income taxes. ( a ) This account shall include the balance of income tax expense related to noncurrent items from regulated operations which have been deferred to later periods as a result of comprehensive interperiod tax allocation related to temporary differences that arise from regulated operations.
( b ) This account shall be credited or debited, as appropriate, and Account 7250, Provision for Deferred Operating Income Taxes—Net, shall reflect the offset for the tax effect of revenues and expenses from regulated operations which have been included in the determination of taxable income, but which will not be included in the determination of book income or for the tax effect of revenues and expenses from regulated operations which have been included in the determination of book income prior to the inclusion in the determination of taxable income.
( c ) As regulated assets or liabilities which generated the prepaid income tax or deferred income tax are reclassified from long-term or noncurrent status to current status, the appropriate deferred income tax shall be reclassified from this account to Account 4100, Net Current Deferred Operating Income Taxes.
( d ) The classification of deferred income taxes as current or noncurrent shall follow the classification of the asset or liability that gave rise to the deferred income tax. If there is no related asset or liability, classification shall be based on the expected turnaround of the temporary difference.
( e ) Subsidiary record categories shall be maintained in order that the company may separately report the amounts contained herein that are property related and those that are nonproperty related. Such subsidiary record categories shall be reported as required by part 43 of this Commission's Rules and Regulations.
[51 FR 43499, Dec. 2, 1986, as amended at 59 FR 9419, Feb. 28, 1994]
Order filed March 12, 2015

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00192-CV

____________

In the Interest of E.L., a Child

On Appeal from the 315th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-05682J

ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment in a suit in which the 

termination of the parent-child relationship is at issue.

The notice of appeal was filed February 22, 2015. Appellant has established 

indigence or is presumed to be indigent. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(a). The 

reporter’s record was due within 10 days after the notice of appeal was filed. See 

Tex. R. App. P. 35.1(b); 28.4(a)(1). The record has not been filed.

Appeals in parental termination cases and child protection cases are to be 

brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is 
filed. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a). The trial and appellate courts are jointly 

responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 35.3(c). The trial court must direct the court reporter to immediately commence 

the preparation of the reporter’s record and must arrange for a substitute reporter, 

if necessary. See Tex. R. App. P. 28.4(b)(1). 

Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely in this accelerated 

appeal, we issue the following order:

We order Cara Skinner, the official court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal on or before March 23, 2015. If Cara Skinner does not timely file the 

record as ordered, the court will issue an order requiring her to appear at a hearing 

to show cause why the record has not been timely filed and why she should not be 

held in contempt of court for failing to file the record as ordered. Contempt of 

court is punishable by a fine and/or confinement in jail.

PER CURIAM
#### § 400.3 Who may apply.

In order to apply for a grant under this part, an applicant must be a State or Tribal Organization as defined in § 400.2.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         754,110
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       4,251,813
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               100,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       2,502,326
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         2,493,515
<LOANS>                                     45,304,212
<ALLOWANCE>                                    225,352
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              68,621,565
<DEPOSITS>                                  42,409,568
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,420,725
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    17,420,468
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,370,804
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              68,621,565
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              3,635,301
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              908,369
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               326,037
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             4,869,707
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,162,223
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,208,854
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,660,853
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   24,528
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,549,739
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,166,884
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,166,884
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   757,519
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.60
<LOANS-NON>                                     32,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               207,472
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    6,648
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              225,352
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           225,352
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4266

To expand the boundaries of the Stones River National Battlefield in

Tennessee, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 20, 1994

Mr. GORDON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Natural Resources

A BILL

To expand the boundaries of the Stones River National

Battlefield in Tennessee, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF BATTLEFIELD

4 The Act entitled ‘‘An Act to amend the boundaries

5 of Stones River National Battlefield, Tennessee, and for

6 other purposes’’, approved December 23, 1987 (101 Stat.

7 1433; 16 U.S.C. 426n) is amended by striking in the first

8 sentence of section 1(a) ‘‘numbered 327/80,004B, and

9 dated November 1991’’ and inserting ‘‘numbered

10 ———— and dated ——————— 1994’’.
2

•HR 4266 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

2 There is hereby authorized to be appropriated such

3 sums as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of

4 this Act.

Æ
#### § 22.701 Scope.

The rules in this subpart govern the licensing and operation of stations and systems in the Rural Radiotelephone Service. The licensing and operation of these stations and systems is also subject to rules elsewhere in this part that apply generally to the Public Mobile Services. In case of conflict, however, the rules in this subpart govern.
Revised Summary of Compensation Arrangement - Named Executive Officers



 Exhibit 10.35 
 REVISED SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENT 
 APPLICABLE TO THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS 
 As of March 12, 2007, the following represents the compensation of the executive officers of NMT Medical, Inc. (the
“Company”): 
  

										
	 	  	2007 Compensation
	 Executive Officer
	  	Annual
Salary	  	 Bonus for Work
 Performed in 2006
	 	 	 Shares Underlying
 Stock Options
 Granted in
2006

	 John E. Ahern
President and Chief Executive Officer
	  	$	400,000	  	$	0	 	 	50,000
	 Richard E. Davis
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	  	$	300,000	  	$	135,000	(1)	 	0



	(1)	Mr. Davis’ bonus was paid in accordance with the terms of that certain Amended and Restated Employment Agreement that he entered into with the Company on May 20,
2004, which is filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as filed with the SEC on August 10, 2004.